122-01 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No.......122-01 Passed
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
FOR 30.5 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HYLAND-
~ CROY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET SOUTH OF BRAND
ROAD, FROM: U-1, RURAL DISTRICT (JEROME TOWNSHIP
ZONING DISTRICT), TO: PLR, PLANNED LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (BISHOP'S RUN - VALENTIN
PARCEL /CASE NO.O1-096Z).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, ~ of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit
"A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PLR, Planned Low
Density Residential District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures
contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of
Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
, Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the
earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this,~?~ day of ~~~~vYt,C.s 200
ayo - residing Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
I hereby certify that copies of this
Ordinance/Resolution were posted in the
City of Dublin in accordance with Section
731.25 of the Ohio Revised Code.
~J
~,ppt; , Jerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
wut,.dp~
o
r
0
s '
~o
` `
a~
• ~
Y
~Qy
''C~po, ENSwA ~ ~-N~,1
~"+M77jj~ tAOP W,^" _
GlBiiEf
SITE ~ $
9'
. ~(Y,.<
N~
CT
• ~ ~~p`p
~ ~ £
l ~~cT
" w°m'r` ~ C
wk~,, ca $
I w~ ~ ~vA
. ~ w~
~ x~
wrAt ~4'`' a
~ P21 .
~
w
a
~c or
~~e ~ e
~ ~
R-1
R-1
`rr~ o '~^1
PLR
R1
AY n
r A
~Tp'~-o
ewm~ cAS e
g R-1
G~ o
SITE 3W y o
W~
e
~ ~ -
R-1
PLR FP
w~TO ~ s
w~~~ s
cR`
w,~,, pa
w~ }
cT
~i
R-1
ROYAL PL
R-1
~ R-1
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway -Dublin, Ohio 43017-1006
Phone: 614-410-4400 -Fax: 614-410-4490 M e m o
,CITY OF DUQLIN .
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Marsha Grigsby, Interim City Manager ~r~_
Date: May 16, 2002
Re:~~,,B~~'?hop Run O 1-0962, Ord # 122-01
Initiated by~'Barbara M. Clarke, Director of Planning - c~
J
Bishop's Run is 30.5 acres located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road approximately 800 feet
south of Mitchell-Dewitt Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval
of the rezoning for Bishop's Run on March 7, 2002. The approved plan includes 56 lots and
7.64 acres of parkland.
As a part of the approved plan there was a "Road to Wow!" treatment included along Hyland-
Croy Road which ties density increases with frontage enhancements. Density increases are
calculated according to the value of features being provided. The approved frontage treatment
here includes woodland plantings, wildflower meadows, a bikepath, an ornamental bosque, a
split rail fence, and 0.85 acres of additional parkland.
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved Bishop's Run with 7 conditions, on March 7,
2002. The text has since been revised to include all the changes required by Condition 1.
Conditions 2 and portions of 5 and 6 have been addressed and are reflected in the drawings. The
' remaining conditions will be implemented at the time of the preliminary plat.
~S SUBMIT'TES~ TO COUNCIL
~ Z fog MEETtf~G acv Ze ~ Z
~ ~ ~
t
d...... ia. ~e,~Py~~~I 1~.~~.' uh,.~..1 f ._nA 9t~~ % ~ V'dG a
Ei~.. ~
n
D~~~.in.Ohio43Q16 ~ , Y'~c~,.ii~~t ~Q
mrrr F i~onc-l7DD: 61~,-i~,1 6: c0
~9°.. f~ kart ~ 1~. }
i tC)f:0i P'.'i.~UJEOiV.L`' -~~...p,~.,.,-,®._.....,..,
f] ~ ,r . F -~c ~ ^ E ; ~ll~_ _iticn ~Jo: PGZ Gate(s): P&Z Acficn:
. w...._.w. ,.,.b..._,,r..~..~_...,w -
~ f~.!~~: ~ iti~,o No: ~ Cate R-~ceivcd: P ~~i~ _;i 8;~:
a
- -1-----
T, ~ ~y
to ~ . t , 9i
PL- \~c Su'~,`;~i~ ~..,d'dU (3! ORlGl~~!?,L SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APP!_ICATIONS - r'i.L.A~I; I'I:1~;~-
~~,i~~i0 Ti11r;Tcc?~1 (T 3; CONIES OF THc ORiG1NAL APPLICATION and
C.i.C;< Tii"= 1'(i'':. u~ ~,"L;CATION
F,'.~ii:..,..aty =)....;ie, t~;...^t Plan (Code S~_rtion to 0~_)
-t
~.u~_ r ,
_
_ _
~ ~ 147-00-00-005-000 I F ~ ii
~ t 30.5 acres ~
j -
Hyland- Croy Road ,
y
~ i'!. ~ . i L, ~;.~.~rr ~
Approximately 800 feet SW of Hyland-Croy, Mitchell Dewitt intersection
Hyland-Croy Road &Mitchell--Dewitt Road
_ p - - r -~I
~ ~ ~ I )f~"17 ~~~~'.IF ~ I~ 'i rli .i.r~, 000 feet ~ .t I
i
t,
Agricultural i ~i
~ ~ . . ~ ; ~ ~ ~ FOR MEETtNO +OF! A- 7"I! . f ~ 7 (?1
Single-family subdivision d~ _~'(gZ ~
l
3
EXHIBIT "B"
Current or Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: No. of Acres to be Rezoned:
U-1 (Jerome Township PLR 30.5 acres
recently annexed)
STATEMENT:
State briefly haw the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity.
The proposed rezoning mirrors the rezoning approved within the Westbury and Park Place
Subdivisions and furthers the guidelines established in the Community Plan. The site
plan shows street connections to the south and Past as well as maintaining the setback
created on the Park Place site. The PLR district is appropriate for the area, as
single-family housing shown on the site meshes well with the metro park system and
existing subdivisions.
ww~r
STATEMENT:
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan.
The proposed rezoning to the PLR district will follow the future land use plan adopted
in the Community Plan. The plan shows that the proposed subdivision is planned for
medium density of approximately 2 units to the acre. ThP street system will connect
with the Bishop's Crossing Subdivison and Hyland-Croy Road. The proposed rezoning
is certainly within the parameters of the guidelines presQnted in the the Community Pl
PREVIOUS APPLICATION?
Has an application for rezoning the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES ? NO ~
IF YES, WHEN?
State the basis of reconsideration:
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COMPOSITE OR PRELIMINARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES C~ NO ?
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES C~ NO ?
II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
® 13 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ ~ p, ,
L~ K],al deacripticn of th~~ property to be rezoned consists of _ 3 page(s).
PLAN REQUIREMENTS:
? 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24" X 36') SNOWING: -
a, The silo and all land S00 feet beyond tho boundaries
h North ,crow and har scaly
Lw;;tiny conditions (R~>ad::, huildinga, vwh~tilicn.lupi~~lr.il~hy, jurir:dicl4~nal boun~laii~~s, utililirs, ~dc-) ~
.1 Prup~ s~Ki Uses (Rrqumal tr~nsport,~tirn .y:a~m, d~~n:ali~~s, :a of dw~~lhnys, hwldin~y~unit typos, squan3 footay~s, par~I,~r,~~Uo~~y~ y~,y:y~, ~~lc.)
Exi,tin~l ,+nd proposed zoning distri<.t tqundari:,s ~ ~ (j~(~
R~~n:nunfApl~In:aiion PLA-108 Da(o0~+r~8i99
I'.r~~~. ~,i~
f. Size of the site in acres/square f=ei; and ~ i
j g. All property lines, street rights-of-wad Fa,~ome~its, ~,nd ch,er ini.,rmat~on related to the Iecatien of the prc~osed bcurJ,:r ~s.
i4 SETS OF REUUC~D DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAfd 11" X 17')
C
I
gJ i~ l4 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP w1/>P: (i`JGT LcSS TH~,N 8';~" 11" A~JD NOT MORE TH~,PJ 16" X 2G")
Ii Shoeving contiguous property owners within 500 faet from the porirneter cf the area to he rezened.
L _ - -
i`f. COITIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS _ _ _ _
List all n ghboring property owners within 3C0 f f m the perimeter of thr area to be rezened. Such list to b in a cordance 4~i h the County Auditor
carrr.nt tax !st. (Use additional sheets a, neccs_ ary.) La6~l.> `~nrattod fcr Avery 5160 may he submitted as I~b .l or on a ccrrput .r d~sf..
P~+Oi'tRTY OWNER
(no' P1 ~rtgage Company or Tax Service) P,1 ~ ~itir At~r~ S CITY/~TATE/'IP CO''~
wrr ~ - , _ _ - - -
li _ . - _ _ _ _ - - -
I
j
i ~ I
i
see ttached list i
,I
i.
it
~I
ii
-
i--~-J~-.- - ~I
;I
w,a. I I
- - - ,i
i
- - - -
IL____ _
~ -----'i
i
'I ~ ' "1.001
,L------ -----1
ai ai
t~" , r°~ b ~
~ ivy i~
~j
I
- i
t
rrw/. F^OPERTY OWNER INPORi~1ATION
_ _ _ _
Narm ri Current Pro rt Owner s ~
` P' Y Richard & Elaine Valentin I
i
~ rla ingAc4jn 5.
t, Jt c,ir,~ ; ,<~te. zip cc~fe~ 6707 Paul Road, Westerville, OH 43082
11-
~ :.'C,,,aT~rl.-phnr"" (614) 882-2842 ~``x ~
I
-_~__.-M...-.....__.___-_.__~._-._.____.~-.-._..-~
Ben W. Hale Jr.
i~asi:e o. Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect etc): ~ i
re ccmele±s the Ageni Authorization, Section `JII, h~lo~.v, e~o Smlth & Hale
j
i~; r cit; ~t-~, z~NC:~;~~~ 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215
(614) 221-4255 (614) 221-4409
- - - - '`I
'JI ~f the i vt, i_; tr primsnJ ccnl i t I .:r-~cn?
Ben W. Hale, Jr. j
V. P,UT~tiCr,17_.d'i:OiJ TC VISIT THE PROPERTY
~r,l_, to ~ ~~r;,:,~rty araa or.~~;~ry Cih,, ~,r i, r c~~!-~r to proms. t ; ~ ~ir.'i.:n_ Thy C~•,~.~r~~pf%hcant r..-.L;; r;rizr.._ Ci~~,
i ~ ' :'rr:~~5 ~o':i:~i[, t r ~;ts~raph and Must a nr~~ ii; I ~I;~ rt, ~+:,~r,r~!. ~ ~ , i ~ ~c.lia.n.
`i'. UT!! i':Y C(SCL!`il^rtER
i r_~ ` D~..flir :~.ili rr . ewer ~~`ori tc i;r~.~~lr: • ni'a! . . ~ s < r~ c~;.i r-, i. ~,cr. t' '~:1 Irc,.,, cf tr~r~ Ci`, ci C Ir cr r,~.:r~st
~ .h i ' is ~<tr F.;1 t. C.!/'.~ i ,~~acity t.> ...i,{ t' , r i t' ~ !irr~t : t~, ~h f~' Cite, ;t v~~L:i~? r- ~ t: ~.r tl~l-~ i r „ I . -art ~:~~~i
I , . ~ a ~ . fo tha f!;c an, ..ntil ~cm~~ luiur. r1_.._ TI ~ ht~r,i , ' il~:,~„ ~a.l~r.;~.{i . ,u;_.,, <<.r r ru ~ ~ .,L
+w..~
i' ~r-:,~^ .~n,l _:ri~~ music n nrni.'cr Dublin rit, ..:.~u- l.: r ~ ccr.~lni.. ~ , i- iir~, ~ Cif ,i r !tilr a a
. I 1 ,IZAl~C~ l_~R ,_PR_~i~JTAT JE~._~C,-=~rG(.?1F~td~-! _--__11~4,&?l~ ~4sxitQn~!!']- -
~I
I 'f~a_ •:r~rr.:ml:~L~hli~-art _,,I,..~,,, i~
-
- -
- 'I
~ t a my ~ lara .nr i _ tn.{ a~ nt in ill muu:r I rt , tl~~ ~ ran ~ ::;ir I it . ~i ct i;~..~[ I I c, it,cn h ~,i'~,r.•; 1 ~ ; .,.n~J I,r~ ' ' ~ ~ ~1
t.> h l .urni L,~ ?'I r.~I.r.. ~~nr3ti, n.. and .,gn~ern~a r ad~_ l,a i~p~ aL~-rl.i, rt j
_ _ _ I
~;n.a~a.r~ of current Property O:vrcr: 0..t.. _ ;t,} ;I
i•
w
'I I~
~ .`;inn:+tur~~ of Cun~ci;t Property Owner. Date:
i
_
VI:I. ?li';'IJC,iNT~S r1Ff-10~1VIT i.
ti)
~i-o9~~
1 a ~ n r~ ~ t,.,r. ~
r ~ ~ rr~rr
~,el
' STATE OP Ohio - - - _ -----~--'I!
COUNTY OF Franklin
I. Ben W. Hale . 1T. ,the applicant or the applicant representative; have read
and understand the contents cf this application. The information contained in this applicaticn, attached exhbits and eft~er infermaticn submitts~l is ccmplete
and in all respects true' and correct, to the best of my kncwledye and belief.
Signature of Applicant or ~ Date:
Authorized Representative:
f _
subscribed and sworn to before me this ~ y cf
~tiw
~ammr'irnr
',,tA~ n., Nc,ary Public -
o`Op+~'' ` '~'F~,'o
~ ~14TALIE C. PATRICK
* ROTARY PUBLIC, STATE Of OHIO
s ~`o,,,= MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 5, 2005
wrr.
E ~4Py
F~
s ~ao~
oc- o~~ ~
. . i f, ~ i ,i i~l ,
APPLICANT ATTORNEY
M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. Ben W. Hale, Jr. City of Dublin
3 Easton Oval c/o Smith & Hale 5800 Shier-Rings Road
.Columbus, OH 43219 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725 Dublin, OH 43016
. Columbus, OH 43215
PROPERTY OWNER
Richard & Elaine Valentin
6707 Paul Road
Westerville, OH 43082
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Board of Park Commissioners of Suzanne Feasel Jon Reigle, Trustee
Columbus 8100 Hyland-Croy Road 7597 Tenbury Drive
7197 Mitchell-Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 Dublin, OH 43017
Plain City, OH 43064
"'"Told & Catherine McCarthty HC Associates _
~5 Hyland-Croy Road 5774 Finnegan Court
.in City, OH 43064 Dublin, OH 43017
~ ropy
~ ~r~,,
'.J ` _
DI -b j le ~
To Whom It May Concern:
' I, /C
C c.~
~
R,~
, , t~~4 lV i' //.1 , as the authorized representative for the
owner(s) of the property included in the rezoning area, hereby grant to Ben W. Hale, Jr. of the
law firm of Smith & Hale, or his designee, the authority to submit and pursue the rezoning to
PLR for the 30.St acres on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road, and any other appropriate
applications necessary to allow the proposed development of the 30.Sf tract. The above-named
attorney representative has the authority to represent the owners' interests in the subject property
at all applicable hearings to insure the rezoning process and any other administrative reviews that
are submitted and completed to allow the development of the property as asingle-family housing
subdivision.
~ Dat Signature
AS SUBMfTTEtJ TO COUtVCtl.
7 FOR MEETING ON 9 / ~/O /
. -;r~'a-,~?
'~~h~CK~°1~K`~°~'' ~"a~4';~~'e."' + SO~.u"~'~e"'"iS~w~7ci`~.~'~e"+. 12"?-'
41/A _ 'NTY D EEC ~ r >,.„~n.) ~,•~r,
, f,. J,i:
. ~~[cit Richard H..Greiner, Jaclc R, Crowe, and Darrell ,A. Iiutchinson
of the 'Township of -'Jerome ,County oT Union
~"r andSttiteof"Ohio Grantors ,in consideration oftlaesum of
One dollar and other good and valuable consideration
to them J~acd6y Richard S. Valentin and Elaine E. Valentin ..•i
His Wife _
_ ofz`he. Citq of Westerville ,Countj~.of Franklin
zznrz'~State of Ohio . - _ G7.2ntees the receipt whereof cs•>zereby
.
ac7rnowledgeddo 7rereby ~IF1Tff,~ct~1~,l:tiTi,SP1j ~I1tD runbP~ tot'hesaid
- ,
Gr2ntee-s • • -Richard S, Valentin and Elaine E. Valentina' his, wife
their heirs and;assigns ~orei~e~; the ~ •
_QQ ~~CC , _
fdllowinylA~P~ 1 l'LSftttP situated in the County of Union ' •
.
in the <S'tate of Ohio,' , ~,andin the Township of
«:,ura
Jerome ~ ~ ~ aria'aouizded ~zd described as col"l. o7rs
Situated in ,the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of
Jerome, in Virginia Military Survey No 3452,; and being a portion
of a: 59.73 acre tract.'of ,rand conveyed .to 'Richard H...Greiner, ~ • '
- Jack R. Crowe and Darrell.',A.. Hu_tchinsan by deed. of record.~.in Deed
Book' 255, Page: 251,. Recorder's. Office,: Union County, bhio, ,and ,is ~ ~
bounded and described asfollows: fi~r,,; , 7~
' ; _ ,..1 G,;»1 r ~ 7~!'g . - • ` ~..1•i:;. 7 rr ~.`si er ,.3T Ct{S i/,•,,
' 'Beginning at a, ..railroad spike set in the ccenterline of .Hyland t ~
• & Croy•Road = County~Road~No. 2=C (60 feet .wide), in the west line
of said Virginia. Military. Survey No. 3452, at~the northwest corner'
of said 59.73 acre' tract Wand at, the southwest corner of an or~igiil;al
F N 53.5 acre tract of land conveyed. to Leland. and peane $ishop`by deed
• a1 ~ of record. in Deed Book 207, Page 45a Recorders Office,.Unidn :County,
s ~ Ohio, said•railroad spike being S 9 00' 00" E a distance of 789.65
~(n-= feet from.a railroad spike found at the intersection of the centerline
~ of Hyland & Croy. Road. zaith -the centerline of Mitchell & DeWitt,iRoad -
G County Road No. 9; ~ _~_t:
~ ~ ~ thence N 80° 07' 30" E along a north line of said 59 73 'acre!
u ~`g tract and along a south line of said original 53.5 acre tract a
~ U ~ distance, of 966.09 ,feet to a 3/4-inch. I.D,..iron pipe found. at a
s cD o corner of said 59.73 acre tract and_ at a_. corner of .said original'' 53.5
J ~V acre tract (passing a 3/4-inch I. D, iron pipe set in the east right-
~ of-way line of Hyland & Croy at 30.00 feet);
, , '
AS Sl1Bi1/i1TTEDTOC~UN thence S 9° 00' 00". E parallel with the centerline of. Hyland &
O Croy Road; parallel with the west line of said Virginia Military
. ! FGR t',t`1EETiNG CSN ~
a.
rte. N( t M,.rL
. - r~.rt-c' ~ k~L'~+''~?ia'xx ?)~~.4"' *YC,.:.'SOg T'',__£'-x~iQ`-~,~x n~~`''f;~-x~"~r~ ~,+-~?S~ "T~.''trkag ~"ri`~,.-e,saS^i §'Tr. ~:.5 ('?-.+i:' r~;l. ,
rs - _
Survey No. 3452 and parallel with'the west line o~ paid 59.73 acre
tract a distance of 1,386.92 feet to a 3/4-inch I, D, iron pipe set
• in the south line of said 59.73 acre tract and in the"north line of
a"51,63 acre tract of land conveyed to Leland and Deane Bishop .by
deed of record,in...Deed Book 229, Page 49, Recorder's .Office, Union
County, Ohio; '
- ~ thence.S 81°..29' 25" W along a portion of the south line of
said 59.73 acre tract and along.a portion of the north line of said
51:63 acre':tract a~ distance 'of 966.01 feet to a •railroad spike set
in the centerline of Hyland & Croy Road, 'in the west line of said
Virginia Pilitary Survey No, 3452, at the southwest corner of said.
f;.~ 59.73 acre tract and at the northwest corner of said 51.63 acre'tract
A (passing.a 3/4-inch I, D, iron pipe found in the. east right-of-way
line of.Hylarid & Croy Road at 936.01 feet);....
I~' thence•-i4 ~~9°. (JO' O,Q"~ W. along 1<he centerline. of Hyland & Croy'.Road, .
~r'~ along the west line of said Virigina Military Survey No. 3452 and
- - along the,~west~line of said 59.73 acre tract a distance of 1,363.90
.feet to the .place, of beginning,
' containing, 30.501 ai:res of land, more .or'.less, and being subject
to all legal highways,` easements and restrictions of record.
~ The above description was prepare.d;by,,Ted L..,R9binson,_Ohio
Surveyor., No",~ 5361, ,,af C,.F: )iird" R.J., : Bu11, ;Ltd. , Consulting
i`. ~ "Engineers: & Surveyor,.Worthington;~ Qhio, from .an actual boundary
' survey performed in the field in March,'.1983:~~,1,
I ~L,AS1' 1'RANSFER• Deed 7iecnrd Volume, 255 _ , Pnge 251
' ~I~ ~~tbP ~xI~~U ~I(J~~saidpremiser,withalltheprivileyes andappurlena~eees
lliereunfo aelorayiny, fo fhe said Grarcfees Richard ; S . Valertin and Elaine
L. Valentin, .
- their ~ heirs and assigns forever.
~Inri'tice said Grantors Richard H. Greiner, Jack R. Crowe, and Darrell
• A Hutch•Lnson _
w~ ~ ~ for themselves andthe~r ,hNirs,
~do• ' tcereby covenantrviYh lhesai2'Granfees Richard S: Valentin
r... I _ Elaine E, Valentin
~ ~ their heirs anrl~rssi~ns, t1zaP they are lan-filly ser.~ed of the premises
a~oresac'rz;•z'lzafthesaidprerrrfres rare .J~CPPc3tI~J ~1fF1TfrA11t Flll~nt11111~J1TiI(CPS]Uhe'It5Uf1tt1
'
-~D•~'D/ ~ u.RETRACI ~PProved By LUC
~ ~PROYED R 7~1KSFER / / Regional Planning Commission
' 1. DOfUI? 4U1RT
_ :`y"„ UNION fAUI~fIY ENGINEER 1~: ~:;:cd C il:
26/~
_ Ah Conveyonce hoc boon asomined and the '
onror ~3 ro^yliod vrlth Section :)14.2Q2 ,
Ise ae.,l_.:., ~'RA~~EERRED ;
iEE f.13'..cl..~ '
' ~~(~r----:_.. _~~1PR 251988
DETTY J. POLI\G
5l.OISE DO'NEI,L, Court4y Auditei~ pj RECDRDEn. L~\ID.! Ct".. C~;i;:'
Oise Dowell, Audi '
~~r ~ ~J ~ IS88 A°R 25 P}' 12~ 44
_
r' ~ja'r( t,(~ c .j'„,'~t~ ~1~ +.ia It ~ x°+ ~ ~ ~ c ~ 1 '~Y ~ O
~ ,'~~1 V ~ ~ y x 4.1 r ,J:~ ~ mom::. ~ 1 ~ l~~r ~-1 ~r '
~I~ nom. 5~11~_..:'"~'~4tF 7 : 5 ~:..a,.
( C S. Y I
+ r Jet;: A, Y p..•. 2,
rve11 forever RIl'r'IC YTS ~I It 1~~9 P~PIt l~ the sa ne ~ rYh. Y>r.~
ani/. that they
.x.i
ate/run`enances, unto the sru'd Grzrntees Richard S. Valentin and
• Elaine E. Valentin L'heir heirs and ussi~ns
• A~!Zinst ttce Zawful cl;r1~!zs. bf'all pe7sons wlrorrlsnever.~
~1TI ~I~IZP~~~IPr1C'II~lhesaidGrurztvrs Richard H. Greiner and
Barbara H. Greiner, his wife; Jack R. Crowe and Kay I. Crowe, his
wife and Darrell A. Hutchinson and F. Francis Hutchinson, his wife
?vho hereby release' their rigJits of domerin thelrremises,hrxve ~ •
hereunto set their hands this 15 a'2y of April -
in the year nf'ourLord one thousanrL ninehrcndred and eighty three (1983 J
~i neD Rna ~rkiinzvleilge,~ in.~resenre Df ~ ~ t•
s b 3 7 3)
s' -fo X . .
:~~G ~,r ~
tis -lv
3,
Sr G .
UlTP~~~fP li Ohio
Franklin C~ITlillt~l ~ , , ~ ~ ~5~ , ~ , '
>,x
~P if ~RPm.Pm11PrP1~~.7hat,orc thcs '.~r., °'~15 ; day' }
_ . . ,.~..:n . , ~ ~r
- of April A.11. 19 83 'Ge1ore me, the snGscrrLer, '
a. :Notary Public : i~r an2'tarsaid courzty, personally came tfie '
above numed~Richard ..H., and Barbara H..Greiner, his wife, Jack R. • and ,
Kay I. Crowe, his wife and Darrell A.~and F. Frances Hutchinson,
• ~ his wife ~ , ~i.r~t
, . i . .
. theG>,anfors
-
in the foreyrrinyl)red, arrd aclrrearvledyed the s•rynfny r~lflze snare fr~ae
voluntary. act anti deetG,>arfhe uses andpurposts flrercin rrrcntirrrrert.
_•,{~D'"~~~i~r;'~<.. _4~IT L1':*t~1~I1?1T~~tt ~`'•1tPT`P1J~liravFlirrerrirtn
,
i ~ i, :~y sccbscrfGed my name, and r~rF~:zed trey officirtf seal nit
_ :t" ,
~ ~ ~ - fTce day and verzr last afores e'd.
tr ~ :A-:r
~x oaoet~ a n r
Tlais instrument was prepared 6~ Darrell A Hutchinson Attorney at Law
255 Partridge Bend, Powe17,_ Otcio___430b5_
~ . - z~ ,t.~ •
t-.... yly.a vd8r ~.~{~.akj i f YF } w of Zo4i14'Y r -i S;~4U'~S.a. rc-:>~-r{- i ,i'u ,..'r'.
~ .e;M~'7+1k~~-~1"~w~` -.R~y'l K'~,. :
r N~ y , i. Sr`i' _'7yScCit "~'~`.F,S!c~:~ -~'F; '''f2=ltr ~ +w'-. _ _ ~ ~ . ,
e.2. SP~xE Iv2' 5~. ~ ~.C. D. B. "LC"1, ? 'r35"_i
r V N G AT,
~ ~r-c-eL~ 1 I o ~ C J' ~ _
_ t Deµl'r ZD. O.`~~_ N P'l~c C~' 3 ~ C
~ ~
• ~ ~ _
1 ~ rJ
J • V' , ~ _ -
~ s _ ~ r 1
• N~ d cv
c~
_r N
!S: ~ ;
ID U. I . _ ice. V Q Q
1 I _ _ i - ~
J ~ i ~ ~ -
• AsSUrnt:D r~ ~ n
~ _ ~ .
y 3O 00, 93c~. C ~ 1
5 9J° Lam' 25'-N 9CC°.C~1' ~ --.--.r--------
~I _ I
Su~~,%FY' O~ =~:C;.JC1 IrJ '`1.:x:5. :~~5 L, Ji.P_i::;•?11=
Ti~`aP. UrJ~o~~.) CGt1r'..`(, ~?-1i0, ~C~~ F: ~,c=_~ S. Vn~_~~~•. .
1 ` - H
i. i~ L' ~ ' ~ - .I I X13-=
J - _
` r ` ,
L,ws
- 1
r
H , r ~K..a ~
iy
i
- •y ~ ¢.-en.~w~i,` _ y:~~ , .s~R.i FY ~w'~~'~?r X ~.i,
P v,!t 3 .`rK,x ,,~'h$. ...o. f
~~n~rt •Cb-:<:~.'..w. - i..~..,, ,i..
F,~. cn ~
~
7
~ ~
` ~ ~
\ ~ ~ ~ Dublin Board
`sO' 9 of Education
ATCH LINE-__--~ ~%f
Dublin Board
of Education
~ I \ M~ j~yE
~ ~ << &
~£w JI
~ ~ ~ R~qO
o
Jon Reigle TR ~ ~ \
Feasel 1017 ~ ~ ~ ,
L~/gsN -~-w
P
° ~ 3
p ~
I i4~-ol-04-00.000 0 ~ 7.oozA~
8C Associates ~ ~
C
~ ~ 3.001
0.50 ~ ~ ¢.(,0$Ac
M~car~hy ~
z 0
Metro Parks
Val in ~
I 3
'~.s~4Z A~
~ 6`~
p~1.1t1 GotLP ~nJ1~fN• 'CWP• vMS 5
2 vMS 3~~ 9
' Z2¢
Metro Parks I
~ M/I Schottenstein Homes 6
~ Bishop's Crossing 51 .6 3 A C
O _ 3.°°'
s
o. o7d1
G~ y O
~ cJ~
11 ' - I 6 0~ ~W s
J~~oME Tip • ~ ~
. I 7
-
32.33Ac
8
16Ac
I t; tzo Tow sH ~
N• T ~ ~ ~ Cow P.
w~ wP
oZ- O0(.oo0
~¢1 _as-
z
0
D
Z a
O
r
C7
O
O
D
° v 6L~~ Cow
l~>~?~ UI~SGI
p MEE>tiNG ~ 9
~
16
I 15.04
. RECEIVED
M!I SCHOTTENSTEIN HOMES SUBDIVISION MAY - 8 2002
PLANNED LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT CITY O F D U B L I N
VALENTIN TRACT
HYLAND-CROY ROAD
5/8/02
The following information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section
1181.02(b)(2) of the Dublin City Code and include a total of 30.5+/- acres which includes
7.65+/- acres of open space/park land within the site.
A. The proposed location and size of areas of residential use, indicating dwelling unit
densities, dwelling unit types, the total number of dwelling units for each density area and
the total number of dwelling units proposed in the development plan:
Gross acreage: 30.5E acres
Total units: 56 single family lots/houses
Gross density: 1.84 du/acre with park areas
Lot size: minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet
Setback from dedicated road right-of--way: staggered 25', 30', and 35'
Lot side yards: total lot 14' or more with a minimum of 6' on each side air
conditioners and eaves may encroach).
Lot rear yards: 25'
Maximum height: 35'
No-build zone: No-build zones shall remain free of any structures including, but
not limited to, drives and walks, buildings and outbuildings, sheds, fences,
(except adjacent to park ground) swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play
structures, satellite dish antennae, etc. Nothing herein shall prohibit
overlot grading and drainage facilities and utility lines and utility
structures within said no-build zones. The rear 20 feet of all lots within
the subdivision shall be covered by a no-build zone to keep those areas
free of obstructions
No disturb zone: An area designated on a subdivision plat which shall remain ree
of any structures including, but not limited to, drives, walks, buildings and
outbuildings, sheds, fences, swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play
structures, satellite dish antennae, basketball courts, etc. The existing
natural features shall not be disturbed, removed, or physically altered
unless written permission is granted by the Planning Director or designee.
Grading activities and placement or utilities within said zones are not
permitted unless written permission is granted by both the Planning
Director and the City Engineer or designees. Utilities may cross at right
angles to the said zones or run outside and parallel it.
1
5.16 -02 ~-~o -oz,
r
B. The proposed size, location and use of nonresidential portions of the tract, including
usable open azeas, parks, playgrounds, school sites and other areas and spaces with the
suggested ownership of such azeas and spaces:
Park open space provided: 7.651 acres (located within the subdivision)
Park open space required: 3.971 acres
Location: See attached preliminary site plan. The open space locations shown on the
preliminary site plan aze schematic and may be adjusted to accommodate final
development.
Buffering and landscaping and a tree preservation plan shall be submitted as part of the
preliminary plat process.
A 200 foot scenic setback will be provided along Hyland-Croy Road in which street trees,
landscaping and an entry feature will be located.
A tree survey, tree replacement plan, and a tree preservation plan shall be submitted at the
time of preliminary plat as a basis for the utility/grading plans, indicating trees to be
removed, utility placement, grading and tree protection methods, etc., subject to staff
approval.
Street trees shall be chosen from the City of Dublin approved street tree list and will
include the but not limited following two species and shall be placed 50 feet off center:
Green Ash, and Red Oak and these trees shall be planted so that only one variety is used
per street.
All open space and landscaped azeas not dedicated to the City shall be maintained by the
homeowners association (the association will require all homeowners' participation and
full funding). All utility boxes shall have landscape treatment to be determined at
preliminary plat.
A 3-rail wooden fence (styled after that utilized in the Indian Run subdivision) sha e
erected along the western leg of the property.
C. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage facilities, including
engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness:
Sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to the site from the current termini adjacent to
the proposed development area. Surface drainage shall be handled in conjunction with a
lake/retention basins within which will be constructed by the applicant with approval
from the City of Dublin. The stormwater drainage shall comply with all applicable
requirements in the Dublin Code, and a stormwater drainage plan will be submitted for
2
i
review prior to the preliminary plat. A commitment for the design and operation of the
shared retention ponds shall be determined at the preliminary plat stage.
D. The proposed traffic circulation patterns, including public and private streets, parking
areas, walks and other access ways, indicating their relationship to topography, existing
streets or showing other evidence of reasonableness:
See the attached preliminary site plan which shows the developer's attempt to tie this
proposal into the development to the south to connect the Westbury Subdivision to
Hyland-Croy Road. The internal street system collector will have aright-of--way of 60'
and pavement width(s) of 14' for each lane except for those road right-of--ways identified
on the site plan with 70' widths. The developer shall dedicate an additional 10-foot wide
strip along the Hyland-Croy Road to meet the requirements of the Dublin Thoroughfare
Plan. 40 feet of right-of--way shall be dedicated consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan.
Any intersection improvements for Hyland-Croy Road will be coordinated with the City
of Dublin Engineering staff. The developer shall install a left turn lane from Hyland-Croy
Road into the site and shall install street lighting at the entryway intersection.
Additionally, the developer shall install street lighting along the Hyland-Croy Road
frontage.
Four foot wide sidewalks will be installed on both sides of the streets within the
subdivision to provide for pedestrian traffic except where there will be bike/pedestrian
paths. An eight (8) foot wide asphalt bike/pedestrian path shall be installed along the east
side of Hyland-Croy Road according to the Area Plan. An asphalt bike/pedestrian path
shall be provided at final plat by easement or land connecting to a bike path from
Bishop's Crossing, to allow for an internal circulation system between subdivisions. Said
path shall be subject to staff s approval.
E. The proposed schedule of site development; construction of structures and associated
facilities, including sketches and other materials indicating design principles and concepts
to be followed in site development, construction, landscaping and other features. The
agricultural character landscape treatments shall be completely detailed at the final plat
stage in conformance with the drafted guidelines. Such schedule shall include the
proposed use or reuse of existing features such as topography, structures and streets.
Upon completion of the zoning and obtaining of all plat approvals, utilities will be
extended to the site. The applicant shall prohibit the use of chain link, metal or plastic
fencing on any of the lots within this area through this zoning restriction and recorded
deed restrictions. Any fencing installed upon any lot shall be a three (3) rail split rail
fence with a maximum height of 3.5 feet above finished grade with posts at
approximately 8 feet on center. The fence may be backed with black welded wire mesh
of 12.5 or 14 gauge wire. The specific details of the fence are shown on recorded plat of
Wyndham Village Section 1 on Plat 79, pages 101 and 102, Recorder's Office, Franklin
3
County, Ohio. No fencing shall be installed forward of the building line of any lot. The
developer shall provide either the above described fencing or suitable landscaping
between the lots and park/open space areas. Such fencing or landscaping shall be installed
on the lot.
Throughout the development (1) the same model with the same front elevation shall not
appear within two separate houses on the same side of the street; and (2) the same model
with the same front elevation shall not appear directly across the street or side by side to
the house directly across the street. Streets shall not count as a lot when applying the
above formula. When the lot in question is a corner lot no lot at the same comer shall
have the same model with the same front elevation. An architectural matrix
demonstrating diversity in housing shall be submitted at preliminary plat. Setbacks are to
be varied and will be determined at preliminary plat.
Homes with increased site exposure from Hyland-Croy Road and Tullymore Drive will
have increased architectural detailing on the exposed elevations. Examples of additional
detailing include window surround trim, bay windows, shutters, extra windows,
appropriate window placement, stone or brick facades, and stone or brick plinths and
watercourses. To meet this requirement a house may require several of the listed features.
Examples of modified elevations to meet this will be submitted at the preliminary plat for
review. Those houses proposed to be built along Hyland-Croy Road ant Tullymore Drive
shall have additional exhibits, submitted for review and approval by staff, to meet this
requirement.
The exterior of all homes shall be constructed of all natural materials, brick, stone, wood,
stucco, and/or hardy plank. All homes shall have dimensional asphalt shingles. All
chimneys within the subdivision (either side or rear of the house) shall be constructed of
brick or masonry, and there shall be a plan to add to each elevation some architectural
features to those windows which also face the open space.
Ground signage will be located along Tullymore Drive and will be incorporated into a
landscaped entry feature at that location. The signage will be incorporated in the overall
landscape plan developed for those frontages. The signage, entry features, and entry
lighting shall meet the Dublin Zoning Code and lighting guidelines.
F. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the
surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public
improvements.
The proposed site is located adjacent to the existing Metro Park on the east and bounded
to the west are Hyland-Croy Road and existing homes and farms located in Jerome
Township, on the north by the Smith property and on the south by the preliminary platted
Bishop's Crossing property which contains large-lot home sites.
4
G. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the land to effectuate the proposed
development plan. Evidence of control includes property rights and the engineering
feasibility data which may be necessary.
The applicant has the property under contract to purchase and has retained the
engineering firm of R.D. Zande & Associates to review the site.
mivalentin.txt
5/8/02 (pvp)
5
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
March 7, 2002
_crr~ ul~ ut lll.l~
Oivisan of Planning
5800 Shier-Rings Road
lin, Ohio 43016-1236
Phone/1D0:614-410-4600
Fax:b14-161-6566
Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
1. Rezoning 01-0962 -Bishop's Run
Location: 30.501 acres located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road, approximately
800 feet south of Mitchell-Dewitt Road.
Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification).
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential
District under the provisions of Section 153.051.
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development of 56 lots and 7.64 acres of
park.
Applicant: Richard and Elaine Valentin, 6707 Paul Road, Westerville, Ohio 43082;
represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725,
Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Warren Campbell, Planner.
MOTION: To approve this application because its density conforms to the Community Plan and
~w is lower than the "Road to Wow!" incentive program; it preserves the rural character along
Hyland-Croy Road and continues a 200-foot setback along Hyland-Croy Road, and provides
connections with surrounding subdivisions, the Metro Park, and future development. with seven
conditions:
1) That the text be revised to prohibit fireplaces and bay windows from encroaching
into side yards, require architectural detailing of elevations which can be seen
from exterior roads, not consider streets as lots in counting for architectural
diversity, incorporate a third front setback, have a rear yard of 25 feet, and be
limited to 561ots and a density of 1.84 du/ac, subject to staff approval;
2) That the proposed 25-foot front setbacks on the six lots located on the west side of
the major northJsouth drive be adjusted to vary by a minimum of five feet, as
required in the subdivision diversity ordinance, at the time of the preliminary plat,
and that this be reflected on the drawings submitted for rezoning, subject to staff
approval;
3) That the Bishop's Crossing bikepath along Tullymore Drive be shifted north and
be depicted on the final plats for Bishop's Crossing, subject to~ Suappr~aDl;~
Page 1 of 2 dL fOR ~ ~ a _
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
March 7, 2002
1. Rezoning 01-0962 -Bishop's Run (Continued)
4) That all comments contained within the tree preservation and landscaping section
of this staff report be incorporated into the preliminary plat;
5) That the portion of the lot located in the 100-year flood plain in the northeast
corner of the site be deeded to the Metro Parks, and that and a fence be placed at
the rear of the lot on the deeded portion;
6) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with
current stormwater regulations, and that two raised crosswalks be utilized on the
primary north/south street for traffic calming at the preliminary plat; and
7) That revised plans incorporating these conditions be submitted within two weeks
and prior to scheduling for City Council review.
* Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 7-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with
a positive recommendation.
STAFF CERT FIC TION
Gary . Gunderman
Assistant Planning Director
Page 2 of 2
STAFF REPORT
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MARCH 7, 2002
+_r € €t; iii itE.~t
wr~r
{Yr.r
1. Rezoning 01-0962 -Bishop's Run
Location: 30.501 acres located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road, approximately
800 feet south of Mitchell-Dewitt Road.
Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification).
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential
District under the provisions of Section 153.051.
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development of 56 lots and 7.64 acres of
park.
Applicant: Richard and Elaine Valentin, 6707 Paul Road, Westerville, Ohio 43082;
represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725,
Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Warren Campbell, Planner.
UPDATE:
On February 7, 2002, Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this case in an effort to address
several issues. The main issues to address were a reduction in density, access to the adjacent
Metro Park, asplit-rail fence along Metro Parks, traffic calming, and 100-foot lot widths along
the shared property line with the Metro Parks. The current proposal has been modified to
address these issues. The staff report has been modified slightly to include the changes made to
the current proposal.
BACKGROUND:
This site is located in Union County and was annexed to the City in June of 2001. It continues to
carry U-l, Rural District, a Jerome Township classification. The requested PLR, Plamied Low
Density Residential District generally establishes the permissible density, development
standards, size of park area(s), and a preliminary layout.
The PLR provisions in Section 153.051(B)(3) establish criteria for approval of a development
plan (rezoning):
• The development is consistent in all respects with the purpose, intent, and applicable
standards of pernissible land uses;
• .The density is in conformance with appropriate comprehensive plans such as the Dublin
Future Land Use Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan;
• The site layout maintains the image of Dublin as a planned conullunity;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -March 7, 2002
Page 2
The orientation of open space and linkages, buffer areas, entry ways, etc. contribute to the
overall acceptability of the development plan, and the orderly development of land within the
City;
• The development provides and maintains a safe, convenient, and non-conflicting circulation
system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; and
• The development standards, which may vary from the requirements in the Dublin Code when
warranted, are found to be desirable.
The Commission is to make a recommendation on this rezoning request. The application will
then return to City Council for a public hearing and final vote. Atwo-thirds vote of City Council
is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. The rezoning will
become effective 30 days following Council approval. The proposal will also be subject to
preliminary and final plat review processes at a future date.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Site Characteristics and Zoning:
• The site is a flat, rectangular property of 30.501 acres. It has approximately 1,350 feet of
frontage on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road and about 925 feet of depth. The site is
generally an open farm field with tree rows outlining the perimeter and one running east/west
in the northern two-third of the site.
• The site is bordered on the east by an unincorporated parcel owned by the Metro Park Board.
To the south is the approved Bishop's Crossing subdivision zoned PLR, Planned Low Density
Residential District. To the west of Hyland-Croy Road and the north are parcels located in
unincorporated Jerome Township and zoned U-1, Rural District.
• A tributary to the North Fork of the Indian Run lies to the northeast in the Metro Park parcel,
and this site drains in that direction.
Community Plan Issues:
• Hyland-Croy Road is the western limit of Dublin's exclusive annexation area. Dublin cannot,
without agreement of the City of Columbus, under its current utility contracts, provide services
beyond that point. Recently the southwest corner of the intersection of Hyland-Croy Road and
Mitchell-Dewitt was approved for annexation into the City.
• The proposed Metro Park was introduced in the Community Plan. It will provide "an edge" to
the developed landmass around this side of town. Due to the multi jurisdictional agreement
signed at the inception of the park, the Metro Park land cannot be annexed to any municipality.
The Community Plan Future Land Use map shows this parcel as "public park". In 1997 it was
believed this site would become a part of the proposed Metro Park. As the Metro Park Board
began to acquire property, the purchase decisions changed somewhat from the Community
Plan. Only one parcel on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road and south of Mitchell-Dewitt
Road was bought. The Community Plan indicates the preferred use in this general area as
residential with a density at one to two units per acre. The proposed density for this
development is 1.84 units per acre.
• The proposed "Road to Wow!" program designates this section of Hyland-Croy Road as a
scenic road with "agricultural character". The preliminary site plan shows a 200-foot setback
as measured from the proposed Hyland-Croy right-of--way to the right-of--way of the frontage
road.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -March 7, 2002
Page 3
• Under the proposed "Road to Wow!" guidelines, as agreed upon by the Commission (See
minutes January 8, 2000), any site is considered with a "starting" or base density at the
midpoint recommended in the Community Plan. Density above that point is based on
enhancements generally along the scenic road. Please note: these guidelines do not have the
status of an adopted or codified program. This site would have an assumed base density of
1.5 units per acre. Increases in density would be based on the incorporation of Wow!
elements. Several frontage enhancements conform to the proposed Wow! Element Design
` Guidelines, including a linear roadside meadow (one acre), an ornamental bosque (half an
acre), a roadway woodlands plant (one acre), and asplit-rail fence with battered stone end
posts (1100 feet). This proposal also includes 0.85-acre of additional park land. These
elements were reviewed and under the incentive program, and the potential density increased
to 1_9 units per acre, the maximum as envisioned under the program. It should be noted that
the proposed elements exceed the necessary requirements to achieve a density of 1.9 units per
acre.
• For the use of comparison as requested by the Commission the approved densities of several
other projects in the area include Park Place, .2.08 units per acre, Bishop's Crossing, 2.18 units
per acre, and Westbury 2.03, units per acre.
• The Community Plan references the importance of streams in providing wildlife habitat water
quality, and stormwater functions. A tributary to the North Fork of the Indian Run is located
to the northeast of this site. The plan shows the 100-year floodplain located on one of the
proposed lots in the northeast corner of this site. All flood hazard areas should be located
outside of the proposed lots. The only affected area is at the extreme northwest corner of the
site.
Site Layout and Access:
• Access to the site will be from Tullymore Drive. No access of any type is provided directly
from Hyland-Croy Road. A roadway stub is proposed to the north property line to provide for
potential future development. The stub has shifted to the west since the previous plan.
The Code requires a dedication of 3.69 acres of park based on 30.501 acres with 56 units. A
total of 7.64 acres is shown on the proposed plan, and 6.2 acres of it is located along Hyland-
Croy Road. The remainder is located on the southern property line adjacent to the Bishop's
Crossing park along Tullymore Drive.
Development Standards/Signage:
• This application is one of the first to incorporate the standards in the new subdivision diversity
ordinance. It requires variation in lot width and setback and establishes a minimum buildable
depth of 65 feet. The proposal has met the requirement for varying lot widths with 11 lots (20
percent) at 80 feet, 22 lots (39 percent) at 90 feet, and 23 lots (41 percent) at 100 feet. The
front setbacks will vary between 25, 30, and 35 feet. Only one-third of the lots can utilize the
minimum setback, 201ots in this case. Adjacent lots should have at least five feet difference in
setback. The proposal meets the intent of varying the setbacks except for the six lots located
on the west side of the major north/south street which have a 25-foot setbacks on adjacent lots.
• All lots will have a minimum area of 10,400 square feet. Side yards will be a total of 14 feet
with aone-side minimum of 6 feet. The text states that fireplaces and bay windows are
permitted to encroach into a side yard. This is inconsistent with the Code and should be
removed from the text. The text states that rear yards will be generally 25 percent of the lot
r
t
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -March 7, 2002
Page 4
depth, ranging from 25 to 50 feet. The site plan proposal states that rear yards will be 25 feet.
These need to be consistent.
• This proposal includes four-foot concrete sidewalks on both sides of all interior streets and a
bikepath along Hyland-Croy Road. A bikepath was approved with the Bishop's Crossing
preliminary plat along Tullymore Drive which is adjacent to this site on the south. A condition
required that the bikepath should shift north closer to the shared property line in order to pull it
further away from the road if Bishop's Run (Valentin parcel) were to be platted. The drawings
for Bishop's Crossing should reflect this shift. This proposal shows the bikepath pulled away
from Tullymore Drive.
• Entry signage is to be incorporated into a battered stone pillar. The sign and lighting will meet
Code, the lighting guidelines, and sight triangle requirements.
Tree Preservation and Landscaping:
• Several trees remain on the site and are subject to Dublin Code for preservation, protection,
and replacement if removed. Tree preservation, protection, and replacement plans need to be
submitted at the preliminary plat stage.
• The northern property line contains a few trees larger than six inches. The east/west tree row
is located approximately 400 feet south of the northern property line and also contains a few
trees larger than six inches. A larger area of trees is located at the northeast corner of the site
with a majority being located on the adjacent Metro Park parcel. No-disturb zones of the
appropriate size should be placed on the rear of lots adjacent to tree rows. Trees in the
individual lots should be preserved when possible and replaced per Code if removed. No-
build zones of 20 feet will be utilized on all other lots.
• Street trees will be placed along both sides of all internal streets. Multiple species of trees will
be selected for the front setback and strip along Tullymore Drive. All proposed species should
be submitted at the preliminary plat stage.
• This proposal includes a schematic plan for landscaping along Hyland-Croy Road. A detailed
landscaping plan should be provided at the time of the preliminary plat.
• There is no natural demarcation of the eastern property line abutting the Metro Parks parcel.
An on-site meeting was held to explore this. It was agreed that groupings of native trees,
varying in size and species, should be placed on the Metro Parks parcel along the 1,000-foot
distance. A detailed plan of this should be submitted with the preliminary plat. At the
February 7, 2002 meeting, the Commission requested that asplit-rail fence to be added as a
part of that buffer. This proposal shows a fence along the shared property line with several
openings. The proposed fence will be located on the Metro Parks parcel. A representative of
the Metro Parks has stated that this proposal is acceptable. The Commission also requested
that two access points be provided to allow residents more direct access to the adjacent Metro
Park. This proposal shows two, five-foot concrete sidewalks across from the internal streets.
Homes located on lots adjacent to the proposed access sidewalks should be set back as great a
distance from the paths as permitted in the text.
• A 50-foot mounding and landscape buffer is shown on the southern end of the site. It falls
between the rear of the proposed lots and the future extension of Tullymore Drive. It also
abuts a 25-foot strip of open space along this edge of Bishop's Crossing. A common
maintenance program of this combined 75-foot strip of open space needs to be established.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -March 7, 2002
Page 5
Utilities and Storm Water:
• The proposal includes the extension of all necessary utilities at the expense of the developer.
Facilities in the area are adequate to service this proposal. Water will be provided by a 16-inch
water main located along the east side of Hyland-Croy Road. It is expected to be put in place
by Bishop's Crossing. Sanitary sewer could be extended from Bishop's Crossing or from the
future extension for the Dublin-Jerome High School on Mitchell-Dewitt Road. This will be
determined at the preliminary plat.
The Thoroughfare Plan calls for 80 feet ofright-of--way along Hyland-Croy Road, and the plan
• designates 40 feet from the centerline to meet this requirement.
~ At this stage there has been no detail provided regarding stormwater function on the site.
• Details should be provided at the preliminary plat. Stormwater management is indicated by a
basin located on the Metro Parks site. An easement must be provided to the City to assure
maintenance of the stormwater function.
• The agricultural nature of this site makes it ideal for the placement of utilities in the rear of
lots. As stated in the text, plans for the screening plan for rear located utility boxes should be
submitted at the preliminary plat stage.
Architecture/Architectural Diversity:
• The architectural standards are similar to Bishop's Crossing and Park Place. Natural
materials including brick, stone, wood, stucco, and/or fiber cement siding (Hardi-plank) are
mandatory. Roofing will be dimensional asphalt shingles. Chimneys will be clad with
masonry or stucco stone. Consistent with the Commission's recent policy, the text should
prohibit direct vent stoves.
• A front house elevation cannot be repeated within two lots on the same side of the street, or
three lots across from it. Corner lots must also have different models and elevations. This is
adequate as a "general" standard, but a diversity matrix must be provided at preliminary plat.
It may involve more or less lots to meet the diversity intent. Also, the text should remove the
counting of streets as a lot.
The Commission has expressed concern about the house elevations that are visible from
exterior roads. Each elevation that faces open space must conform to an architectural
detailing plan. This should be added to the text.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In response to the comments given by Commission at the February 7, 2002 meeting this proposal
incorporates multiple "Wow!" enhancements which exceed the requested density of 1.84 units
per acre. The proposal also includes two access points to the adjacent Metro Parks, asplit-rail
fence along the Metro Parks, several raised crosswalks, and 100-foot lots along the Metro Parks
shared property line. The applicant has worked with staff to address and incorporate all the
comments of the previous meeting. Staff recommends approval with seven conditions:
Conditions:
1) That the text be revised to prohibit fireplaces and bay windows from encroaching into
side yards, include a section addressing architectural detailing of elevations which can
be seen from exterior roads, removal of streets counting as lots for architectural
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -March 7, 2002
Page 6
diversity, incorporate a third front setback, and have a rear yard of 25 feet, subject to
staff approval;
2) That the proposed 25-foot front setbacks on the six lots located on the west side of the
major north south drive be adjusted to vary by a minimum of five feet as required in
the subdivision diversity ordinance at the time of the preliminary plat and that this be
reflected on the drawings submitted for rezoning, subject to staff approval;
3) That the Bishop's Crossing bikepath along Tullymore Drive be shifted north and be
depicted on the final plats for Bishop's Crossing, subject to staff approval;
4) That all comments contained within the tree preservation and landscaping section of
this staff report be incorporated into the preliminary plat;
5) That the floodway, floodway-plus-20, and 100-year floodplain for the tributary to the
Indian Run be illustrated on all future plans and that no portion of those areas fall
within any proposed lots;
6) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with
current stormwater regulations, at the preliminary plat; and
7) That revised plans incorporating these conditions be submitted within two weeks and
prior to scheduling for City Council review.
Bases:
1) The density of the project, utilizing the "Road to Wow!" program, falls within the
recommended range under the Community Plan and Commission's guidelines.
2) The amenities provided in the "Road to Wow!" frontage exceeds those necessary to
achieve the proposed density.
3) The plan, as revised above, preserves the rural character along Hyland-Croy Road as
recommended in the "Road to Wow!" draft guidelines.
4) The plan continues a 200-foot setback along Hyland-Croy Road for new
development.
5) The plan provides connections with surrounding subdivisions, the Metro Park, and
future development.
~ Id%<~
i
n~-
Z
~ ~A~.~
a
c~ -
I
z I ~
z G
~ I ~ p`~ ~ ~
7
~1 - 1 ~ ~ ~ `S'AY R
z -{ter ~ ~~Ct1 , Arcv+`, ,
Q ARO WAY
o ~ Z
a W~, ~ ,tB~
,
y'T`y'~,~r, ~ cASr~ o' 1r~' ~ ~ 1-t
I ' ~
~ _ -
i J ~ RltlGSEIJD CT
o ~ ~ I a ,~l ~ ~ E?N<E C7 i
I ~ ~ ~ ci .AST
~ . ~ -
~ _
r J ~ ~ A
y
3 ~7or
~ ,a ~R;-- r n ~
~E o -
W .k±~m.SURI i ~ • ~
~HARSlCk1 u+ _ , W wAt~ as ` ,
~ ~ ~ ~ W f-. \ i' J ~ I WAY - v'~~
O li t i C'f~ , rf.4~ J', -
y,,
~ ~ - ~ _ - - 'f ~ ~ "ate
~ r~ , - ~
~ ~ ~ VME OR o / ' W y
YAl-P(. A _ ~ C1A
~ ,
~ \ ' 11 l
-
~ \ ~ J 1~~\ j, p~10ENIX'.,PARK ~ ' G~ i ~i 1
-~J 1 ~ \
7 i
I _ 1 ~ die i "cE -',,,4r„~ d ~ ~ F
j iz
' - / ~ I~~Ei,,, Bishop's Run
_ _ _ ` ~a
~ i~`°"" Hyland-Croy Road
SCALES-,INCH E AL _ -
~ l a
~ N
t
1
=1 `
' P
\ '
s
R-1
_ ,
,
l~~'
U-1
' PLR
PUD "Y PU
-
~TCNF«-pEw' ~ CASiLE R I p
~Ro
U-1 _ _ ~
a
a.
' u- SITE y
v
1
- ~ ,
1
U i
J
= k
i
PLR '
r
~r '~n. Ex
S
___r~ - I(
_ _ - 1 1
~ ~ ~ .O
_ ~
+ ~
t
_ 1
\
01-09GZ
Bishop's Run
~TTa Hyland-Croy Road
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
~ ,
~ ~
1~ ~1 ~
I I ~
II
i ~
.
~ `C ~
1~ -
>
i ~Mi = / i i - ~ ~ \ ~
~
f ~
~q~- '
I
I I i i e i i , ~~o I
~ ~ I I
i i i ~ I~
~
II _ ~~5 ~~~y
I' ~ i i ~ ~
,t ~ '
I ~ -
cam"'-~ ~ \
- - - - - - ~ I T
Jc.. ~ ~
I jcwx;~~.~ I I i ! ~~6 ~ ~ /
I I I I I I n~ ~ / ~ i
I c I ~ - ~i ~K~~ o~
I~ ~
~ ~ ro~~
I I - ~ r01~tdv ~'1
~ ~
III
! I I ZONING. PLR _
SETBACffi~ -
S7E A.RFA +/JOS01 ACRD FRO\T: 5`/.GGf~RP1J 2:. J(! A 35
TDTAL LOTS: 56 SIDE 1<' ~A~-(6' ACN. P&'~ SD~~
® 1QIIv-RdL7Q I.OT $nF. 10,<CC SF. RSAA 25'
ASLV-LUUM LC77 FRO!.TAC~~ 6C C¢ 8,~1
GROS. DT'S!7]':+/- its. D'J/AC O?'T SPACE R.QI`LR;~ ~3DBG;.
l.di 7'SPCS: A55 a F: Dl; = 335 AC
1IXT R'ID7]1-25 (NJ<%j TJ7A:1~.`G 39: AC
9(T CID7}i . 2G (35.: K) OPT <_PACE PRO\'G>F~.
BC VCID7}! - 1 ] (19.]Xj +/.]b1 AG
PR ELIN.INARY DF_V ELOPM ENT FLA N FOR 7_ON IN G
sib ~ ~ BISHOP'S SUN ~ ~
g`~ ~~~~~b~~, ~ Valentin Tract a~ ~
~%F~~
q~ ~ PRE 1, I M I N A R Y D E V P, L O P M N T P T, A N FOR 7, O N I N G ~p
1'
iK
~P'~
t
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -March 7, 2002
Page 3
1. Rezoning 01-0962 -Bishop's Run
Warren Campbell presented this rezoning application. The Commission tabled it on February 7,
2002, to address reducing density, Metro Park access, a split rail fence along the Metro Park,
traffic calming, and the 100-foot lot widths bordering the Metro Park. He said all of those issues
had been addressed with tonight's proposed plans. He showed several slides.
This 30.5-acre parcel is located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road. There are two marginal ~
tree rows, but every effort will be made to save as many trees as possible. He said the street stub
to the north had been shifted, as requested.
Mr. Campbell said Condition 6 in the staff report needs to be revised, as staff now believes that
crosswalks might not be the best solution. Staff is requesting the applicant to work with staff on
relocating the entrance and a few other road changes at the preliminary plat stage, rather than
using speed bumps. Mr. Hammersmith said the City Engineer has reviewed this and preferred to
re-examine the layout. He considers raised crosswalks are really a reactive measure, and that
conforms to Dublin's traffic calming policy.
Mr. Messineo asked about street layout revisions. Mr. Hammersmith said entry point might be
relocated to the center, to break up the long run of street. He said possibly, internal to the site, a
connector street could be provided. This would have the greatest effect on the lot layout.
Staff recommends approval of this application with seven conditions:
1) That the text be revised to prohibit fireplaces and bay windows from encroaching into side
yards, include a section addressing architectural detailing of elevations which can be seen
from exterior roads, removal of streets counting as lots for architectural diversity, incorporate
a third front setback, and have a rear yard of 25 feet, subject to staff approval;
2) That the proposed 25-foot front setbacks on the six lots located on the west side of the major
north/south drive be adjusted to vary by a minimum of five feet as required in the subdivision
diversity ordinance at the time of the preliminary plat and that this be reflected on the
drawings submitted for rezoning, subject to staff approval;
3) That the Bishop's Crossing bikepath along Tullymore Drive be shifted north and be depicted
on the final plats for Bishop's Crossing, subject to staff approval;
4) That all comments contained within the tree preservation and landscaping section of this staff
report be incorporated into the preliminary plat;
5) That the floodway, floodway-plus-20, and 100-year floodplain for the tributary to the Indian
Run be illustrated on all future plans and that no portion of those areas fall within any
proposed lots;
6) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with current
stormwater regulations, and work with staff to find the most suitable layout to address traffic
calming within the site, at the preliminary plat; and
7) That revised plans incorporating these conditions be submitted within two weeks and prior to
scheduling for City Council review.
Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, compared the original plan with the revised plan.
Now there are 11 lots at 80 feet wide (20 percent); 22 at 90 feet wide (39 percent); and 23 lots
(41 percent) are 100 feet wide. Most lots can have side-loaded garages. He said the landscaping
between this development and the Metro Parks had been significantly enhanced. Mr. Hale said it
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -March 7, 2002
Page 4
does not make sense to relocate the street and to internally redesign the subdivision. They are,
however, willing to do. the crosswalks, or to provide a bond for several years after the
subdivision is finished, if necessary. He wants to settle what the subdivision will look like now.
Mr. Hale said he agreed to all of the original staff report conditions.
Mr. Eastep said traffic calming would get residents safely from the subdivision to the Metro
Park, and this was previously discussed at great length. He wanted to act proactively and do it
the way it is designed per tonight's application. Ms. Boring agreed, and she wanted traffic
calming now, rather that after people build houses.
Mr. Gerber also said too many neighborhoods seem to need traffic calming later. He wanted to
take care of it now at the developer's expense.
Mr. Sprague said a smaller perceived route with larger trees would slow down traffic
physchologically. He doubted the proposed 2'/z-inch trees would have the desired effect. Mr.
Hale suggested increasing street trees on the main street to three inches in diameter.
Mr. Sprague asked if stop signs had been contemplated for traffic calming. Mr. Hale said they
would be happy to install them, but the City had to do a warrant study.
Mr. Sprague asked about extended speed bumps or stripes for traffic calming. Mr. Hale said it
should be a condition of the preliminary plat as to what traffic calming devices should be done.
He said serrated concrete could be used or crosswalks with warning signs.
Ms. Boring said there should be raised crosswalks to define the safe route for pedestrians.
Mr. Hale said there are two park access points and there should be raised crosswalks at each.
Ralph Feasel,a Hyland-Croy Road resident abutting the site to the north, said they are very
pleased with this layout. His only concern is the sanitary sewer line. If it comes from the north,
it would go through his property. Mr. Eastep said he would be asked for an easement, if
necessary, to cross his lot.
Paul Hammersmith said the 18-inch sewer for the high school would come from Shannon Glen.
This site would be served through Bishop's Crossing or Westbury, but it is not finalized.
Mr. Eastep said typically, a raised crosswalk has a tabletop profile, flat on the top, not a hump.
Mr. Hammersmith said they are typically only three or four inches high.
Mr. Fishman said stubbed streets become the place where people dump their grass clippings. He
suggested easements instead of a stub that could be abandoned if not needed.
Mr. Hale said putting them in, like bikepaths, at the beginning is more expensive, but it has
better results. Residents are always upset later if it was not obvious the street would be there,
both with the City and with the developer.
Mr. Fishman agreed that stubbing the street would be okay. He noticed there was no tot lot and
.suggested adding one along the Wow frontage. Mr. Hale said there will be one in Bishop's
Crossing. Mr. Eastep did not think a tot lot should be in the 200-foot setback.
i
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -March 7, 2002
Page 5
Mr. Eastep said Condition 1 needs to cover the revised density of 1.84 du/ac and the lot total of
56, in the text revisions.
Mr. Hale said ownership of the 200-foot setback would be transferred to the City, but a forced
and funded homeowners' association (made up of Bishop's Crossing and Bishop's Run) would
maintain it.
Mr. Gerber agreed with Mr. Fishman's and Mr. Hale's concerns about the stub. He suggested
installing a shorter stub which would also communicate the future street extension.
Mr. Hale said they could install a return of the curb so that it looks like a street, if Engineering
agrees. He said if the two lots want to do side load garages, they will want them off that street.
Mr. Hale agreed that the garages will be side loaded on all 100-foot lots.
Mr. Zimmerman asked if the large lot on the northwest corner that fell into the floodplain would
be eliminated. Mr. Hale said no. This is not a regulated stream, and legally it is not in the 100-
year floodplain. The actual topographical study was done by the developer to see if there was a
100-year flood, where it would fall. Mr. Hale agreed that the back part of that lot could be
deeded to Metro Parks or the City to eliminate the concern. Ms. Boring agreed to the suggestion.
Mr. Hale also agreed to extend the fence, subject to staff approval.
Ms. Boring requested that Condition 6 be modified to include implementing two raised
crosswalks on the preliminary development plan for zoning with the last revision date February
15, 2002. Mr. Hammersmith asked that there be no more than four crosswalks, two being raised.
Mr. Zimmerman made the motion to approve this application because its density conforms to the
Community Plan and is lower than the "Road to Wow!" incentive program; it preserves the rural
character along Hyland-Croy Road and continues a 200-foot setback along Hyland-Croy Road,
and provides connections with surrounding subdivisions, the Metro Park, and future
development. with seven conditions:
1) That the text be revised to prohibit fireplaces and bay windows from encroaching into side
yards, require architectural detailing of elevations which can be seen from exterior roads, not
consider streets as lots in counting for architectural diversity, incorporate a third front
setback, have a rear yard of 25 feet, and be limited to 56 lots and a density of 1.84 du/ac,
subject to staff approval;
2) That the proposed 25-foot front setbacks on the six lots located on the west side of the major
north/south drive be adjusted to vary by a minimum of five feet, as required in the
subdivision diversity ordinance, at the time of the preliminary plat, and that this be reflected
on the drawings submitted for rezoning, subject to staff approval;
3) That the Bishop's Crossing bikepath along Tullymore Drive be shifted north and be depicted
on the final plats for Bishop's Crossing, subject to staff approval;
4) That all comments contained within the tree preservation and landscaping section of this staff
report be incorporated into the preliminary plat;
5) That the portion of the lot located in the 100-year flood plain in the northeast corner of the
site be deeded to the Metro Parks, and that and a fence be placed at the rear of the lot on the
deeded portion;
I!~
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -March 7, 2002
Page 6
6) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with current
stormwater regulations, and that two raised crosswalks be utilized on the primary north/south
street for traffic calming at the preliminary plat; and
7) That revised plans incorporating these conditions be submitted within two weeks and prior to
scheduling for City Council review.
Mr. Hale agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Eastep seconded the motion,. and the vote was as
follows: Mr. Gerber, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Messineo, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Fishman,
yes; Mr. Eastep, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman. (Approved 7-0.)
Mr. Sprague thanked the applicants for their cooperation.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Page 9 Meeting
I
Held September 17, 2001
(YURI I
Ordinance 119- - An Ordinance Providi for a Change in Zoni for 44.208
Acres Located on is West Sidc of Sawmill R d, from: PUD, Plann Unit _
Development Distn , to: PUD, Planned Unit velopment District. ( rthcast
Quad PUD, Subareas A and SB -Giant Eagle ter - 7605 Sawmill R d/Case
No. 00-0422)
rs. Boring introduced th rdinance and moved to ref it to Planning and Zoni
C mission.
Ms. hinnici-Zuercher second the motion.
Vote the motion: Mr. Peterso yes; Mc Adamek, yes; Mr. einer, yes; Mayor
ICranstu r, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zue her, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; rs. Boring, yes.
Ordinance 0-Oi - An Ordinance viding for a Change in Zo ing for 1.069 Acres
Located on th Nortlr Side of ~4'est Bri ae Street, Approximately 0 Feet West of
High Street, fro R-2, Limited Suburb n Residential District, to: ,Suburban
OCtice and Instit 'onal District. (Dublin hoots - 62 R'. Bridge Stre Case No. O1- I
1022)
Mrs. Boring introduc the Ordinance and move to refer it to Planning and Z ing
Commission.
r. Adamek seconded the otion.
V eon the motion: Ms. Ch nici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. terson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; rs.
Bo g, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; ayor ICranstuber, yes; .Adamek, yes.
i
~~rdina ce 121-01 - An Ordinan Providing for a Chanb in Zoning for 17.4 Acres i
ocated the Southwest Corner o Avery-Muirfield Road d Post Road, from:
PCD, Plan d Commerce District, t PCD, Planned Comm ce District. (Riverside
Hospital PC -Text Revision/Case N O1-lO1Z)
Mr. Adamek in oduced the Ordinance an owed to refer it to Plann g and Zoning ~
Commission.
Mr. Peterson secon ed the motion.
Vote on the motion: r. McCash, yes; Mr. Rein yes; Mc Peterson, yes; Ors. Boring,
yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; ayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. hinnici-Zuercher, yes.
Ordinance 122-01 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 30.5 Acres
Located on the East Side of I{yland-Croy Road, Approximately 800 Feet South oC
Brand Road, from: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township Zoning District), to:
PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. (Bishop's Run -Valentin
ParceUCase No. 01-0962) j
Mrs. Boring introduced the Ordinance and moved to refer it to Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms.
Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor ICranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
I
t~/Ordinan 123-01 -An O finance Providin r a Change in Zon g for 92.25 Acres
'ocated a he Northeast C er of Hyland-Cr ~ Road and Mitche Dewitt Road,
from: U-1, iral District (Je me Township Zo g District), to: P ,Planned
i
Unit Devclopn nt District. (Du in High School I[ 8300 Mitchell-De ~itt
oad/Case No. -0952)
Adamek introd ed the Ordinanc
Mr . oring inquired. Council is doing its without a recom endation reflecting
Coun ~ 's previous disc sions about the s back requirements.
Mrs. Bo ~ng moved to ref the ordinance to arming and Zonin ommission with th
request th the Planning Co mission is mind that the 200-foots back is only a
recommend 'on, not a require ent of law.
Ms. Chinnici- etcher seconde fie motion_
Mr. McCash inq 'red if there is a t eframc Council ould like to reques or this
legislation.
Mr. Ciarochi stated t t the timeframe e schools are wo ~ng with is tt-- '
O 1-0962
Bishop's Run
Hyland-Croy Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -February 7, 2002
Page 2
1. Rezoning 01-0962 -Bishop's Run
Warren Campbell said this 30.5-acre site is located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road. It is
currently zoned U-1, and this request is to rezone it to PLR, Planned .Low Density Residential
District. A 61-lot single-family residential development with 7.6 acres of parkland is proposed.
He showed several slides.
The site shares a tree row with Bishop's Crossing, and to the east is a Metro Parks parcel. A
~ portion of the 100-year flood plain encroaches on two of the proposed lots. Mr. Campbell said
staff is requesting all lots at the time of the preliminary plat exclude any flood plain area.
r..
Mr. Campbell said there would be access from Tullymore Drive extension through Bishop's
Crossing. A left turn lane will be constructed as part of Bishop's Crossing. A 200-foot setback
is proposed with "Wow" elements along the frontage. He said the elements shown tonight would
only warrant a density of 1.59 du/ac. A buffer will be provided on the south property line to
create a combined 75-foot buffer. The bikepath planned on the north of Tullymore Drive will be
moved farther away from the road.
The Metro Park is proposed to be an open area with only a grass play area. Staff is proposing
that groupings of trees be placed to demarcate visually the lots from the Metro Park
Mr. Campbell said staff is recommending approval of this application with ten conditions:
1) That the density be reduced or that additional "Wow" features be added to the Hyland-Croy
frontage to warrant the requested density;
2) That the plan be revised to incorporate a true 200-foot setback along Hyland-Croy Road, as
measured between right-of--ways;
3) That all aspects of the architectural diversity ordinance which have not been met as
mentioned with the staff report, be incorporated;
4) That the text be revised to prohibit fireplaces and bay windows from encroaching into
side yards, address architectural detailing of house elevations which can be seen from
exterior roads, exclude streets when removal of streets counting as lots for architectural
diversity, and incorporate a third front setback, subject to staff approval;
5) That the Bishop's Crossing bikepath along Tullymore Drive be shifted to the north
and be depicted on the final plats, subject to staff approval;
6) That all comments contained within the tree preservation and landscaping section of
this staff report be incorporated into the preliminary plat;
7) That the floodway, floodway-plus-20 feet, and 100-year floodplain for the tributary to
the Indian Run be illustrated on all future plans and that no portion of those areas fall
within any proposed lots;
8) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with
current stormwater regulations, at the preliminary plat;
9) That the stub to the north be shifted to the west, to the satisfaction of staff; and
10) That revised plans incorporating these conditions be submitted within two weeks and prior
to scheduling of the City Council review.
Nicholas Cavalaris, Smith and Hale, said he would be taking the place of Ben Hale representing
the applicants. He said the applicants agreed to the conditions as listed above. He said the 7.5
acre openspace provided is double the requirements.
Stephen Caplinger, M/I Homes, said they appreciated the Wow program, even though it has not
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -February 7, 2002
Page 3
been adopted by ordinance. He said all the homes would face Hyland-Croy Road. The path will
serve the neighborhood and make a major connection with the Indian Run. This site will have
parkways, park, and leisure trails on all sides. The lots are 80 to 100 feet wide. Mr. Caplinger
said they agreed to realign the street stub to the north farther away from the park.
Ms. Boring asked about traffic calming on the straight road which stubs to the north which may
connect someday to Brand Road. Mr. Campbell said it was discussed, but odds are that the cost
of bridging the stream will be prohibitive to the number of lots possible. He said staff s goal was
for it not to be expanded onto Brand Road.
Ms. Boring asked if the Commission would have any jurisdiction regarding density in this
planned district during the preliminary plat stage.
Mr. Campbell said additional Wow elements could include fencing, wildflower meadows,
woodland plantings, grasslands, barns, etc. He said elements proposed would be run through the
"Wowcalculator" which is the tool for calculating density.
Mr. Campbell said 43 percent of the lots would contain 10,400 square feet. The largest lot is
13,000 square feet in area.
Ms. Clarke said the concern of the speed of traffic on the north south road is a legitimate issue.
Ms. Boring said it should be a condition that traffic calming solutions be added to the main
north/south street.
Ms. Boring asked who would service the Metro Parks area in case of an emergency since it was
not in the City of Dublin. [No conclusion was reached.]
Ms. Boring expects the lot owners abutting the Metro Parks to request fencing to identify their
private property. Mr. Campbell said Metro Parks, M/I, and staff do not desire a fence.
Mr. Eastep said in the past, Dublin has acted proactively to mark park edges with fencing. This
helps to prevent play structures and dumping grass clippings, etc. in the park. The split rail fence
proposed by the developer should also be placed in the back of the lots. He said split rail fence
along the frontage detracted from appearance. Ms. Boring agreed.
Ms. Boring thought there was a fence at Bishop's Crossing along Hyland-Croy Road.
Mr. Eastep did not think this fence should count towards Wow in the front or the back. The
density should be reduced, or some Wow elements should be added in the front. Mr. Eastep did
not think this developer should get Wowcalculator points to increase density because the site
backs up to the Metro Parks.
Ms. Clarke said there were two rezoning applications along Hyland-Croy Road that had a direct
Metro Parks donation. This parcel stands on its own.
Mr. Eastep asked if the pond was part of the stormwater engineering for this subdivision or was
it a Metro Parks pond. Mr. Campbell said it handles this subdivision's stormwater but it will be
entirely on Metro Parks' property.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -February 7, 2002
Page 4
Mr. Eastep said he was concerned about the straight north/south road. It lacked imagination for
lots backing onto the park. He said he would like to see the stub moved.
Mr. Eastep said the development standards do not show the staff requested 200-foot setback.
Mr. Caplinger said it would be 200 feet from the right-of--way to right-of--way line.
Mr. Zimmerman said any split rail fence across the back of the lots should have a gate.
Mr. Eastep said a split rail gate has a serious maintenance issue. He suggested eliminating a lot
and creating an easement with a path to the pond area. Mr. Sprague agreed. Mr. Eastep
suggested one or two accesses between properties. The easements should be shown on the plats.
Mr. Sprague asked about the approved densities of Park Place, Westbury, and Bishop's Crossing.
Mr. Campbell said they were all two du/ac. Mr. Caplinger said Bishop's Crossing had a density
of 2.18 du/ac. He said it had 15.5 percent openspace, and this development has 25 percent.
Mr. Campbell said the frontage would have heavy woodlands plantings, recreating a forest and
the same fence.
Ms. Boring said in order to make the projects match, the continuation of the fence in the front
would be necessary. Mr. Campbell agreed. Ms. Boring said fencing should be at the rear of the
lots facing Metro Park also. She wanted everything the same.
Mr. Caplinger said it made sense to have the same fence for Bishop's Crossing and Bishop's
Run. He said Metro Parks wants the park to be accessible and open and told him they did not
want a fence at the rear of these lots. Instead, trees and markers were suggested to define the
boundary. Mr. Eastep preferred a fence.
Mr. Hahn said there have been park problems in the past, especially in more naturalized
boundaries. He said if Metro Parks is planning a mowed lawn through this area, he expected an
occasional playground set to pop up in the park. He said with lawn grass near the property line,
a fence would not work, especially if the City had to maintain it. Ms. Boring felt a fence was
necessary because the area is naturalized.
Mr. Caplinger said there needed to be some type of access to the park in the rear fence.
Mr. Eastep asked if four lots could be eliminated along the Metro Park making them all 100 feet
wide, providing two easements. Mr. Caplinger agreed to provide access points, but not to
eliminate four lots.
Ms. Boring said when this application returned, the Commission wanted a lower density, some
demarcation such as a fence added in the rear with access points to the park, and traffic calming
solutions on the major north/south road, such as a raised sidewalk.
Mr. Eastep agreed and said he would like to see more evergreen plantings in the Wow 200-foot
setback. Mr. Caplinger agreed to work with staff on plant selection.
Mr. Eastep said with nice Wow features, perhaps a density of 1.4-1.9 du/ac would work. Ms.
Boring suggested a density of 1.6 du/ac. Mr. Caplinger did not think this was. an overly dense
project, but he agreed to work with staff.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -February 7, 2002
Page 5
Mr. Eastep made the motion to table this application as previously agreed to by the applicant.
Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Messino, yes; Ms.
Boring, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Eastep, yes. (Tabled 5-0.) Mr.
Sprague thanked Mr. Caplinger for his patience.
rwi
r~%
~a~ JNINOZ ?I03 i~IFT'Id .LN~Y~IdO'I~A~Q' A~IdAIIL~II'I~ZId---. ~
o
~ - I~Ir12I S~dOHSIg N ~
~ .
. _ ,
' ~
~~~g
~ ''~i
L-- i ~ oil :
_
w ,a ~ . , ~ Q
-~~w ~
a a ~ ~ ~ I r~ ~
w, p ~ ~ qg~
_ _ _
h< w. - : ~ . --f-- - - ~
od.ww i ~ e. I ~ g ~ ~S
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ o
/ ~ , g I I I y g
- dd v
1/ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I_r ~ ~ Lam. r-'il / I ~~Sr¢!i ~~'w
~ % -a-- -~-1-_
: , i
I ~Rm ege .9eaq ~ x
, ,
a~e ~~o~~o~~~~o~ry~
pp44 ~ / 4 ~ ~
•
w ~ ~ k vk !A k
< .
a ~ wl w~ k' z=~~ Q ~
- --h~A.-- ~ C a
< y
s~ ~ ~
i
~
. .
q x ~ WW
/ t I .I~~~
4 1 k k ! k k"
o q
~ ~ .R o x x g q ~ 6 ~ a
a
~ ~w eh
\ / ~ \ o fC R~ ul ~
\ / ~
V O
i i e~ tip. rn
\ ~ ~
R ~S \ I Nwa ~
~Ir. ti ~O° o H
'for ~ A ~~c ~
N ~g~~ a
~
d z f
ww'rro wscso zuvuo'ww'aw.auasrsxs+a~wwaw.wws:a
_,..u..~ 1w... ,..,,~ui1 r...