113-93 Ordinance AMENDED
- _.,--~-,,-_.,._-
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co, Form No, 30043
Ordinance No._ ___11-3~.9_3__.(Amended) Passed - m19 m_u
r--
r- AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING OF
4.04 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
"
~ POST ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF AVERY
ROAD FROM: R-l, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT TO: R-2, LIMITED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of
Dublin, ,state of Ohio, 7 of the elected members
concurrlng:
~ section 1. That the following described real estate (see
attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of
Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to R-2, Limited
Suburban Residential District and shall be subject to
regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70
(Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin
Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list
of contiguous and affected property owners, and the
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit
"C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of
this Ordinance and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance
r therewith.
"'~ Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this ~ I J-f day of d~ , 1991Jf
~~{
Mayo i - Pres'iding Off icer
Attest:
~ C!.- C!Lu~
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
! hereby certify that copies of this Ordinance/Resollll;ulI \Yt!re posted in the
City of Dublin in accordance w:th Sect'on 731,25 of the ()+!io R9vised Code.
~<2-~
r- Ch.1e of (!,)llf161. O"bl:n. Oh:o
L
.<.........,.,....."""""'~.....,_r"....'~,"'"~~,.,.,".<...."'~,'_~.."..~,,_,_._~,_....._,__.. ,.... __._.. .-.....~._
<c. . ,~, - n . <::fT
. ~~~
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF TilE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No: ~
DISTRICT MAP ZH ztt.s - O:;!......>
(Reclassification of Land) Date Filed:
Fee Receipt . 6
Received by:
Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO TilE 1I0NORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
~ &-!I P~~lr....C' clo
, The Applicant Thomas M. Bell
l (lIave property in contract)
being the ovner(s),/lessee(s) of propc:"ty located within the area proposed for
Residential Development - ..subd~i.!liCl. P1et , requests that the following
described land to be placed in the Limited Suburban Residential District
. ~ cJ-- f IS'5;1'l-
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED tl hl q+ ~ (L -2-
.'f...
1. Ceneral Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
(Per Lisa Fierce since description is too lengthy~attachedilegaldescription)
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) l of
'~
,
a recorded plat, with an area of .
b. Beginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimension
of from the (specify) of
'.
(street or other), and having an area of
.
(TWo Parcells 2.034 Acres & 2.006 Acres:
c. The tract of land contn~'ing 4.04 Acres and bouhded by:
PC/McKitrick Limited Partnership (specify) on the N@E W (Circle)
Charles R. Snyder (specify) on the N S E DCircle)
Albert L. & Florence Schobv (specify) on the N sC!)w (Circle)
Post Rd. (specify) on the~ E W' (Circle)
d" Attached legal description: YES X NO
\ Su. G',cL\~ \"~, '" A- It 'Z~
:<,,~.~-@t~"'-fi-- \,i(' ::: ,i "
r :Lil~---'-'-' U !'j
Poge 1 of J ':,; \ NOV I 9 IU.i3
""_.,~~.
Hap of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8~ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, casements and
other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
fully dimensioned.
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
,...,..". boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned.' The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
See Exhibit .., " f> "
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF TilE DESCRIBED LAND
1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: Ten (10) Single Family Lots
.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
- copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and Exhibits submitted
Plot Plan _____; Building Plan _____; Development Plan ~; Sketch _____;
Photographs _____; Other Preliminary Site Plan (specify)
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
Properties borders apartments to the south. commerical zoning to the
west and single family to the east and north.
Page 2 of 3 pages
,fI'-
;;:,;, , IJI]- IlIlIliiiIilf ~.
"
3. nas an appHcation for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
. YES
,
NO X'
If Yes, state the basis of rcconsideration
C. AFFIDAVIT
Bcfore completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF 01110
., COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
: I (we) Thomas M. Bell
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included,
in the applic4tion and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and,that the statements
and attachcd exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief.
8388 Arbory Hill Ct.
Dublin. OH 43017
(Mailing address)
Office: 888-4855 Fax: 888-4852
(Phone) .'
Subscribed and sworn to November , 1993.
Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory:
No one other than Mr. Bell
(Name (Address ) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - rOo not wrIte beiow thI.-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn lIeld to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of lIearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
3. City Council: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
."~~",,,,,,'~"'~-~'~~~'~~-~'''~~'-'........'.
, , , , ? ... J." I ,. _.. _
. . . 1_ ~ :.. : . ~ .:.. = L' 11
. . , EXHrBIT I 6/ 2-
.. ~~ P)
. .
."
t... " . , .
.
_. .4 .._.. ..
2.034 ACRE PARCEL
SitUOled in the State of Ohio. County of Franklin. Ory of Dublln.' lOCllIea ln
Virginia Military Survey No. 2999 and being a pan of those traelS as conveyed to POMcKitricJc
Limited Partnership by deed of record in Official Record 11422F04. all references being to those
of record in the Recorder's Office. Franklin CoWuy. Ohio. being more panicularly bounded and
!"... described as follows:
'. Beginning for reference aJ a pow in the centerline of Post Road marking the
nonhwesterly comer of thaI 1. ()(XJacre parcel as conveyed to Albert L and Florence M. Schoby
by deed of record in Deed Book 3305. Page 691. and also marking a nonheasredy corner oj said
PCIMcKitricJc limited Pannership traas;
.
thence leaving said cenrerline. Sowh 1-11'47- East. along the westerly line of said
1.CXXJ acre tract. a distance of 30.00 feet to an iron pin and being the true place of beginning
for the following described tract of land;
.
thence Sowh 1-11'47- East. continuing alOng tk westerly line of sai~ Schoby
tract. a distance of 170.36 feet to an iron pin;
'.
thence leaving said westerly line: Sowh 88'56'03. West. across said POMcKitrick
Limited Partnership traas. a distance of 477,.00 feet to an iron pin:
thence Nonh 28'3F18- West. a distance of 191.58feez to an iron pin in the
sowherly rigJu-of-way line of Post Road;
.
thence North 88'56'03- East, along the southerly line of Post ROOd. a distance of
408.19 feet to an iron pin marlcing an angle point in said right-of-way line;
thence Nonh 88'48'13- East. conrinuing along tksourherly rigJu-of-way line of
Post Road. a distance of 156.75 feet to the true place of beginning and containing 2.034 acres.
more or less. I>
Subject. however. to all legal riglus-of-way and lor easemenrs. if any. of previous
record.
The bearings in the above description are based upon the westerly line of the
Albert L and Florence M. Schoby J. fXXJ acre tract as being South )-11 '47- East.
As of January 19. 1990, rhe iron pins have not been set.
0-\08-A
A'-'- oc
'L J":!:, - 5 q t\- -z. Me Kirrick. 016
8/" I~ ~ ..1c.
~
... . '. - r 2 ~' ~~ :', ~ :- I q
- - - "- - \",
,-. .. '"'",
, .. ;1~
' '\ . -" - 2 .1' z..
. . -
. CXNJU' r:;
2.006 A.CRE PARCEL
Situared in the Stale of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, !awed in Virginia
Military Survey No. 2999 and being a part oftMse tracts as conveyed to PC/McKitrick Limited
Pannership l7y deed of record in Official Record 11422F04, all referenas being to those of
record in the Recorder's Office, Franklin Cowuy, Ohio, being more particularly bounded and
'!"" described as follows:
Beginningfor reference aJ a poiru in the centerline of Post Road marking the northeasterly
comer of that 3 acre tract as convqed to Ozarles R. Snyder. Inc. by deed of record in Deed
Book 2797, Page 228, said point also being a northwesterly comer of said Pc/McKitrick. limited
Parmership traas,'
.
thence leaving said centerline, Scwh "37'38- East. along the easterly line of said 3 acre
rraa, a distance of 30.06 feet ro an iron pin set in rhe sowherfy righr-of-way line of Post Road
and being rhe true place of beginning for rhe following described tract of land,.
rhence leaving said easterly line, Nonh 88'56'03- East, alOng the sowherly righl-ofway
of Post Road, a distance of 605.00 fee/ro an iron pin;
.
thence leaving said sowherly righl-of-way line, Scwh 44-10'19- West, a distance of
241.42feet ro an iron pin,.
rhence Sowh 88'56'03- West. a distance of423.00fte/to an iron pin in rhe easterly line
of the aforemeruioned Ozarles R. Srryder, Inc.. acre tract;
rhence North 4'37'38- Wesr, along rhe easterly line of said tract. a distance of 170.33
piil)(r,' , feet io lhe lrue place of beginning and coruaining 2.lX>6 acres, more or less.
'\
Subject, however, 10 all legal rigJus-oj-way and/or easementS. if any, of previous record.
The bearings in the above description are based upon the easrerly line of the ~ Charles R.
Snyder, Inc. 3 acre rract as being Scwh 4'37'38- &sr.
As of January 19, 1990, the iron pins have nor been sere
o - ~o8-A
ALL O~
'L 13 - Sc::)4\
+8{" !q?> jc...
.
McKitrick. 022
I""""'"
It 'N it U"-
. ,
" .
..' ,"
:
.' .
:
..
.. ' ,
." . '..
..
'.
"
,.."
Exhibit ~ '" f> "
Property Owners and Addresses
Contigous to Proposed Development
1. Ruth E. Mast 6759 Avery Rd.
Dublin, OK 43002
2. Ci ty of Dublin 6665 Coffman Rd.
Dublin, OR 43017
3. Linda K. Pomante 6800 Avery Rd.
Dublin, OK 43017
4. D.M. & J. Baker 4099 Louqhmor Dr.
Dublin, OR 43017
5. B. & D. & Sandra Keiderlinc Mark J. Bater
239 Clover Court
Dublin, OR 43017
".. 6. Gerald E. & B.A. Foqle 6336 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
7. Doris Dinkinson 6316 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
8. D.H. Bromwich 6300 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
9. Dr. D. & B.L. Vraneken 6296 Post Road
Dublin, OK 43017
10. Stephan S. Ropp 6290 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
11. Fidelity Calvin Corp. 3356 Thompson Circle Ct.
Dublin, OR 43017
12. W. F. Driscoll 6230 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
13. Olde Poste Properties 2041 Arlinqate Lane
Columbus, OR 43228
14. Jeffery M. Wilkens 6700 Wilcox Rd.
2481 Stone Haven Place
COlumbus, OK 43210
/.<!~<W11t,..
""~.~~~..~-,~",-,-~.~,,,-.._- ill
. , ' .. ' '
, ."'
..
,
.. ,- '
.," I
"
.. '
, ' ,
..
, '
.. . '
"
.".. ...
.... " ,...
"
, "
--
15. Perimeter Lakes 1105 Schrock Road
/' Limited Partnership Columbus, OH 43229
.. 16. Perimeter Lakes 1105 Schrock Road
Limited Partnership Columbus, OH 43229
17. Al & F.M. Schoby 6233 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
18. Snyder Development Co. 1652 W. 5th Ave.
Columbus, OH 43212
19. Residential Services, Inc. State Savings Co.
Properties & Subsidiaries
3800 W. Dublin-Granville Rd.
Dublin, OH 43017
20. Hospital Properties, Inc. Frank'!'. Panvorm II
3535 Olentanqy River Rd.
Columbus, OH 43214-0000
,-"
"~--"~=~'~'~~~. .
f2--2- ~Q ,1 b 'q4- 'aJ- t~~
, ~!n-.
The applicant/ow r hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
requcst for RXZOning by the Dublin Planning and
"
Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee
or binding commitment that the City of Dublin wi.ll be oble to provide essential
services such as water and sewer facilJUes when needed by said applicant.
'nle City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth or the City or Duhlin and Northwest
Franklin County has stretclled the City's capacity to provide Ulcse services
to the llmit. As such, the City oC Duhlin may be unable to make all or part
of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
l 11/10/93 ..
Date authorized
-
: Applicant
~
"
,
,
1;\1 ~
~
n .
~
~:::i ' i
':.: ~
\.1'
Iii ..v .".~?'I.i.J hfJ.'I' .. ........
:.:"1 -~~ n. I >?
U
Ii "- l
:, '
lie /N'.r
,
i,
~ ~ l, ,
~r I\l ,
!J " ~I
r nJr :..
: ~
~
r l ' 1 ,
'A o. III . ~ i
;j: ~ I !
:L. . "
r; /7#I'~ ~
~ If
r ~
'" } , ~
. . ~ ~ ~ '
\ ' ~', 'tl
:OJ''''I . \
f: . m'~ I <:)
.
, " (J)
~' ~
:1 , 'I
..~
I> ~
I:: ;
":l" ..
] "
;: !
V
'\!'. .
~i ~> ....
v ~;:~ .
:f'
fl' ~
'/ ' r-
0,/ ~ ,.
ill,
II;," ~p~\) ~ .
~
....,. ~,~~li ,
l"
'~I ~~~~~
~ ... :\!\ ~
If" "~~
. " ~ ~
t.'"
iii 1 "
.
~
; i ~}~
~ ~ ~ ~
r l~~ i ~ ~ ~
,..' ~ t Q ~ 1b
:, 'I ~' II ~. "
' '~t " ~
:' '. .\ ~
;: ;~i : ~~ lil
r ,k ~~ t t ' r It>
UI, ~l m t\ )'!
L/ !~ o C") , : 'l
." - IAAJ ~ . t . !ow
. . ,
;:", .. 00= (' . ,
;' '~ c: - ,?'.! ~
;:: \ ~ m ~ ~ ~. .
t] :z: G;:2J ' ..
~ "'} Q, ,
;. , , t.,
~. f ~ ~
,. ~
f ~;~ ~,.'..t
n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f
!li~ ~ ~Q& ... \ "
"!" t ~ II ~ ~
\~I~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~,
!:'~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ,
~ /....'1' , ~~
:.~'~~t" ~ ~u ~ ,~ I
,,:;: ~~,~\;I~ ~ ~t ,
r ~ t~ d ' ~. ~ .. ~' !
: r l.
:~~ ~ ~, r.. , ,
Li>. ~~~'!~~? o :0 . ..
;0:
;.~ "&!:l ~ ~ ~ m)};~ ! ..-
".. ht~~~~'1
~:~,,~ , 0 Q ~ '4 R o 0 () .,-... .",'"1' ""..~
?fl? H $ ~ '( " .... m~ ~
y' ~H lIJ ~ 0""'-
,.,L, b S C us <'\
'It ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ ~ m ()..
:; ~~' ~t ~ O\'-l ~
R3 f'k
, ~kewi ~
lb 'ot-s '
,
~'
1 --
--n..... I III ~ I I
- '---,..... "- I (11111
- ~I\ 'I' I
I , I
' I-Lr~lll,_",,"
,,. ,,1, ,~____
",I \,\( IJ 1/-/
~I ,,, I ;1,111 i I~I ,
'I- '. 'F.II'I "I
~ , ,,.' '.. e ("I' .' .
~ ~ "'. I, ....
,I ~ / · I. r II,!,,/
~I ~ ~ 1 \ Ii, (/.jtll/I
~ ~ ii i J\ ~ I ~lll~,
. 1\' i,. \r i .'[llj! I.t
.' I \ ;--!-iTt1J~! n'(
,Iit,,"'~' r- . ", ../ '" I i, /1[,'/111
',.. -'"
'I .....'1,;, I ~,' ~~ ~,l,':' ij i I' Ii'
.;: .f~~~:.,,, t ~i~i I~i
/: '~f ~~ : .\11 iHeo'
I \ i' " "I. II ~,'I ~;;....."
I 'i I,! I, _,.."
;;d~ II 1[, j I i I
~ E ~~ ! ii' I }J I : "
\ ~ ~~~ / !l '" I "
,1 at::: 1 ,: '),:~
\" ':..' :\\ :'1 . ~': '" " \
\ '\ \ ': I ' " 'I" . "
\, ): I :1'1.1111, ~ .
\ \ / ,.. ;! "I'III"j '/ '- ~"",.'" '...
' "~ I ~ \', ~
~,,. tot , ,
\ \'" // ,~' ~fjlll i / \ ..., -, "0
\\~ --::/'.. f' "
\ r ' - -,..' ,r- I ' (,I, II " \
' "..- I \ , . ... \ \
,/ / \ ~ l~f I L .'<>......
I t I i ttJ~in ... tJ
\ r1 I.. It-':/~ 1/ I ti3
\ I ~ ~ I /! ", I/d,l'_/;;;-;. g t:
' i ~ : ~ '.r! r--~ ~ < >u
iL,-" i lLJr)iil,/ ~~ G ~
II \ J ,,.' /' ( ~~. 'l' / ~ M ~ '-l
i \ / :. ',/.1 "':M:1:rJ ~
'L" j " ~ 'r!!~I'I_____I'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ '-oJ ~ ~I" "''''_:11.....,.
· :" f' '<:8
.:")" ", · · 0 M C/J ::u
" ' i.. . ri ",Iii II 8 i ~ ~ ti3 ~ ~ _ Z ~ k...
/ '-. , " ),' I ~ ~ tJ t-' 5L.o<-c.l'~
f- \\ /~ I nUl ~ ~ ~ '0 It.+s
-,' -,j, '":'"' ;;;;;-t.! ~ Cij
I I " .,. . , :n L m :;! '"
", - ~", C 2
I · I, I 2 . ~ 'n _ ~
'. :z 1;:.. 0 __ ~
I '--i ;; -~ :ii .-; :"
. 0 m .. . ",_,,,',~
. '... 0 1i~ -::F'..."
I
- -~~~- ,
RECORD OF ACTION
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JAl\TUARY 6, 1994
CITY OF DCRU\
(
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action in the application below at its
regular meeting:
4. Rezoning Application Z93-025 - Bell Property
Location: 4.04 acres within two parcels (2.034 acres and 2.006 acres) located on the south side
of Post Road, approximately 400 feet east of Avery Road.
Existing Zoning: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District (was included as a buffering
requirement along Post Road by Perimeter Center plan).
Request: R-3, Limited Suburban Residential District (amended to R-2 at the meeting.)
Proposed Use: Development of ten single-family lots (amended to eight at the meeting.)
Applicant: Bell Properties, Inc., c/o Thomas M. Bell, 5900 Roche Drive, Columbus, OH
43229.
l\fOTION #1: To amend this rezoning application from R-3, Suburban Residential District, to
R-2, Limited Suburban Residential, as requested by the applicant.
VOTE: 5-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was amended to change the request to R-2, Limited
Suburban Residential District.
:MOTION #2: To approve this rezoning application as amended with the following ten
conditions:
1) That the appropriate park fee be paid to the City in the amount of $16,145 (for 8 lots);
2) That deed restrictions be submitted for review prior to construction or filing the Final Plat,
whichever comes first;
3) That the applicant dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way from centerline along Post Road in
conformance with the Community Plan;
4) That the applicant install an eight-foot bikepath along the south side of Post Road;
5) That Autumn Applause Ash trees be installed within a minimum seven-foot tree lawn;
6) That the number of lots be reduced to a maximum of eight;
7) That the setback along Post Road be increased to fit in appropriately with existing
development, to be determined at Preliminary Plat;
8) That curb cuts be consolidated and limited to a maximum of four driveways;
L. 'T(,: (. ~ .
.~ i,,'CCTjiJ.( .;j.l.l ~~
Page 1 of 2
~..,",
_.~~ - ~--~.....~,~,'~>~."..~ '-"'--~" ~~_~"'~'.~~'o./.;"-~
.'
RECORD OF ACTION
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMl\fiSSION
JAl\TUARY 6, 1994
.~
4. Rezoning Application Z93-025 - Bell Property (Cont.)
9) That the end lots be widened and a buffer consisting of substantial mounding and planting
be installed adjacent to Limited Industrial property (east and west property lines), including
filling in the open areas adjacent to the Schoby property; and
10) That all natural materials be used on the fronts of the houses.
*The applicant agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 5-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved with conditions.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
() --
Page 2 of 2
~
,
,'-'-~--,~-,"",'~'._._...---.,.-
~
...
\,
~
\
~
~
_~ A/"~':;'~O';"'I/""'" ,...' ' ,.,..
I~ '" ,'~
I,
,-?/J'.f
I
i
'" ~ ,
; . I\) * ~
~ I'
~! ~:..
.
l ~ ~ ~
~ ~ \ ~
\ UG, Ul '. .
1'\ _ ~ "..
? 'I (\ '~
. ,
. /7"'~ '\'
~ , I
I I. ~
" ~..
~ g {.. ~ ~ '
~ ... ~ o. 'tJ
I ~ ~ '
~ m'.r , <J
~ ~ (^
I ~ VI
i ~ ~
1'1
I r
"
~
'"
i
I
i
.
i
I ~ r-
'I ~ =>>.
, >t _
. ~t~~~ ~ ~
.1 ~ ~ ~ f ~
~ ~ '" h / .
I ~~~~~ I
I ~~~ ., \/ J
I ... '" I
I ~ ~
I ; ~ ~~ ,I.
I ~ ~ " (
I ~ \ U" ~ I'! I (
, .~)\ ,"11 t .. I
' ~ ~ ~ .,.
I,'C'~, ~~~1.1. I~ ~
~~~ ~ ~'" l ~!I.
I ~~, <> ~ ( {.
~l ~ ~ ~ . '~ ~
t ), ~ ~ 1 ~, G\ , C'\
,I ~! ,. ~
i H~ e~ I~ /"~,,.~, ~
, ~ C"") "-
I "f =<! t::J 1M] t I~ IV
I III m ~ ,
e~ 0 C? ~ 2 'I (). \~
I ~.lI ..,., - 1M] \ . { :,t
~" 0 0 = \ ~ I ....
~ c:: SR -=' ~ /?,-, ,
~ O:J ~ -=0 .
\ r- ~~ n
1M] , '
:2 " ^-
~ It.~' "" \
. t., :
~ m'L ~ ~
" .. "~ '
~ ~ ./~ ~" ~
~ ~ ~Il... '\C \, ~
" , ~ b ~ .. '.
' . ();:' '\ '. \
~ t) ~"~ ~ "'...
~ · " 1>1:0.. ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ or- /-"'~ ,~~
.. ~ r-. ~ ~ kI ~ ~ - I ~~
... iii ~ ~ ~" r... I
1? ' ()~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ I t
". ~ '\ ~ t\ ... 1) (): ~...
" ~~, t\h ' . r ~
i>- ?~~'6~~~ Q :o~"~ ' 1>,'
~ ,,~~ ~ ~\ '\ ~ c m ~\ "
~ ~ ~ f f ~ 0 ~ (") ~ .,'/, .,~"& /700,& ~;-
~ ~ ~ 'I "<; "..... m\J:l '.
~Ih l<~~ Oc:.ll_ ~
::~~ ~~ li C <:0 <,\ ""
,,~~ \-I"~ mlDmC>- ~
~~ Ii"!:> r- IN _
Illl;) , ~ '.11 '" ri<!
W . .. Sr\~~
~ .
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No:. c-
DISTRICT HAP ZM Zq.s - O~->
(Reclassification of Land) Date Filed:
Fee Receipt . 0
"... Received by:
......... Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO THE IIONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
~l f~~1 IV\.c-, clo
The Applicant Thomas M. Bell
(Have property in contract)
being the owner(s),/lessee(s) of propc:-ty located within the area proposed for
Residential Development - Aueai,ri8ien Plat , requests that the following
described land to be placed in the Limited Suburban Residential District R-3.
.
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1- General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
(Per Lisa Fierce since description is too lengthy~attachedilegal description)
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of
, ,
a recorded plat, with an area of .
b. Beginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimensiol
of from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
.
(Two Parcells 2.034 Acres & 2.006 Acres
c. The tract of land conta,'. ,1ng 4.04 Acres and bouhded by:
PC/McKitrick Limited Partnership (specify) on the N@E W (Circle)
Charles R. Snyder (specify) on the N S E DCircle)
Albert L. & Florence Schobv (specify) on the N sC!)w (Circle)
Post Rd. (specify) on the~ E W' (Circle)
.",,-. d.. Attached legal description: YES X NO
\ ~ ~h;bi+ " f+ '. ( "2. r~)
Page 1 of 3 NOV I ('
--~,"' 1lIIiJ T I r
r . .
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8\ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
,.... fully dimensioned.
"""", The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
-
See Exhibit ':sI! " 6 'I (z ~1f<')
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF TilE DESCRIBED LAND
1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: Ten (10) Single Family Lots
.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and Exhibits submitted
Plot Plan _____; Building Plan _____; Development Plan ~; Sketch _____;
Photographs _____; Other Preliminary Site Plan (specify)
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
"#'~,
Properties borders apartments to the south. commerical zoning to the
- west and single family to the east and north.
Page 2 of 3 pages
. .~. 'j-:l'fY'~rw 1
.
J. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
YES
NO X'
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
."""'"
- C. AFFIDAVIT
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
: I (we) Thomas M. Bell
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included,
in the applic4tion and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and,that the statements
",-.. and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief.
S M.(~'iIfa~~\ Pro~~~ ;t~,
8388 Arbory Hill Ct.
Dublin, OH 43017
(Mailing address)
Office: 888-4855 Fax: 888-4852
(Phone) .
Subscribed and sworn to beof..~~~~... me this 11 th day of November ; 19 93.
't...~,,/I.':\'.....
. !~':r_i:- \:' 'M'RIE GREGG
'- .' w~ iI., mTr OF OHIO
Mv COW,i/S:;JON EXPIRES APRIL 2, 1996
,,- Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory:
No one other than Mr. Bell
'~ (Name
(Address) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - foo not wrIte below thls-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn Held to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
J. City Council: Date of nearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
--_.,,-,~.............~~-~._,~-~~ ,~ ='-'~ -- ~~- .~-~.~ "
. .
I
The applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
rcqucst for R-3 Zoning by the Dublin Planning and
Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee
or binding commitment that the City of Dublin "till be able to provide essential
-, services such as water and sewer faciH ties whcn needed hy said applicant.
The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest
Franklin County has stretched thc City's capacity to provldc thcse services
to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part
of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
: 11/10/93
..
Date authorized
-
....ifll"'"
Applicant
.
.;
; '~I
''ry~
~
^.,~'.'.c . ~~ ',. ,;,,' un' "1 ("flt" ,
? .' r-'" t _ __ _ __ 11
,. . , 1_ " ',';'" _.:. U
. " , , EXHrBXt I tlf 2-
.. r:;~ PJ
.' .
t... , .
.
,
-. - .--.,.
2.034 A.CRE PA.RCEL
Situated in the State of Ohio, Ccunry of Franklin, Dry of Dublin, locarea in
Virginia Military Survey No. 2999 and being a pan of those traClS as conveyed to POMcKitrick
limited Pannership by deed of record in Official Record 11422F04, all references being to those
of record in the Recorder's Office, Franklin CcWuy, Ohio, being more panicularly bounded and
described as follows:
" Beginning for reference (JJ a pow in the centerline of Post Road marking the
nonhwesrerly comer of that I. ()(X) acre parcel as conveyed to A.lben L and Florence M. Scholly
by deed of record in Deed Book 3305, Page 691, and also marking a nonheastedy corner of said
PCIMcKitrick limited Pannership tracts;
,
thence leaving said cen/erline, South 1.1/'47- East, along the westerly line of said
1.000 acre tract, a distance of 30.00 fut to an iron pin and being the true place of beginning
for the following described tract of land;
thence South 1.11'47- East, continuing alOng the westerly line of said Scholly
tract, a distance of 170.36feet to an iron pin;
thence leaving said westerly line,' South 88'56'03- West, across said POMcKitrick
limited Pannership tracts, a distance of 4PJJOfeet to an iron pin;
thence Nonh 2331'18- West, a distance of 191. 58 feel 10 an iron pin in the
southerly right-of-way line of Post Road;
thence Nonh 88'56'03- East, along the southerly line of Post RoOd, a distance of
408.19 feet to an iron pin marldng an angle point in said right-of-way line;
thence Nonh 88-48'13- East, continuing along the southerly rigJu-of-way line of
Post Road, a distance of 156.75 Jeer to rhe rrue place of beginning and containing 2.034 acres,
more or less. #
Subject, however, to all legal riglus-of-way andlor easemen/s, if any, of previous
record..
The bearings in rhe above description are based upon the westerly line of the
Alben L and Florence M. Schoby 1. CXXJ acre tract as being South I. 11 '47- East.
As of January 19, 1990, the iron pins lU1ve not been set.
0- \08 -.,6.
Po'-'- O~
IJ../~ - 5'3~-z. McKirric.k.O/6
Sf" 1t!:J-:I::, ...\c. %
,,~
" . v ;> " l~ I, : T I q . ,
... . - .... '- ': "- ~ ~
.... . .....\. -
, .. ExNJUr /I.
' l .., , ' - 2.{'z
. /!}
2.006 ACRE PARCEL
SituaIed in the StaJe of Ohio, County of Franklin, Oty of Dublin, located in Virginia
Military Survey No. 2999 and being a pan of those tracts as conveyed to PC/McKitrick limired
Pannership by deed of record in Official Record 11422F04, all references being to those of
record in the Recorder's Office, Franklin Cowuy, Ohio, being more paniadarly bounded and
described as follows: ~
Beginningfor reference at a poiru in the centerline of Post Road marking the nonheasrerly J
comer of thar 3 acre tract as conveyed to Ozarles R. Srryder, Inc. by deed of record in Deed .........,
Book 2797, Page 228, said point also being a nonhwesterly comer of said Pc/McKitrick limited
Partnership tracts,.
,
thence leaving said ceruerline, South 4"37'38- East, along the easterly line of said 3 acre
tract, a distance of 30. 06 feet to an iron pin set in the southerly rlghJ-of-way line of Post Road
and being the true place of beginning for the following described tract of land,.
thence leaving said easterly line, Nonh 88'56'03- East, alOng the southerly rlghJ-of-way
of Post Road, a distance of 605.00 feer to an iron pin,.
.
thence leaving said southerly rlgJu-of-way line, SoUlh 44"10'19- West, a distance of
241. 42 feet to an iron pin,.
thence South 88'56'03- West, a distance of 423.00feer to an iron pin in the easterly line
of the aforemeruioned CJzarles R. Srryder, Inc" acre tract;
thence Nonh 4'37'38- West, aumg the easterly line of said tract, a distance of 170.33
feet io the true place of beginning and coruaining 2.006 acres, more or less. .......
'\ '}
Subject, however, to all legal rigJus-of-way and/or easementS, if any, of previous record. ---*'
The bearings in the above description are based upon the easterly line of the 'Charles R.
Srryder, Inc. 3 acre tract as being South 4'37'38- East.
As of January 19, 1990, the iron pins have not been set.
a - ~c8-A
ALL O~
'L 13 - 5~4\
"8/" I Cl"?:> .\C-
McKilrick.022
--
."'~~".'"""-~-"*"'"''"''""''''"<--=~--'-';""",,.- ~. -'".,. ~ ~"~Ii:..."'1'" '::''t',;; j1"f-Yir1J'''1 "
- .
Exhibit '. II 6 ' ,
Property Owners and Addresses
Contigous to Proposed Development
-
I. Ruth E. Mast 6759 Avery Rd.
Dublin, OH 43002
2. Ci ty of Dublin 6665 Coffman Rd.
Dublin, OH 43017
3. Linda K. Pomante 6800 Avery Rd.
Dublin, OH 43017
4. D.M. & J. Baker 4099 Loughmor Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
5. B. & D~ & Sandra Keiderlinc Mark J. Bater
239 Clover Court
Dublin, OH 43017
6. Gerald E. & B.A. Fogle 6336 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
7. Doris Dinkinson 6316 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
8. D.H. Bromwich 6300 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
9. Dr. D. & B.L. Vraneken 6296 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
10. Stephan S. Hopp 6290 Post Road
Dublin, OH 43017
II. Fidelity Calvin Corp. 3356 Thompson Circle Ct.
Dublin, OH 43017
12. W.F. Driscoll 6230 Post Road
Dublin, OR 43017
13. Olde Poste Properties 2041 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228
14. Jeffery M. Wilkens 6700 Wilcox Rd.
2481 Stone Haven Place
Columbus, OH 43210
, I z..,
. _.------~_.""',~"~.~"~_.~""'....,,,~-~~~-~----,.~ ~"".,~'" "'" ," ,~ =~_c
.. .
. ,.
15. Perimeter Lakes 1105 Schrock Road
Limited Partnership Columbus, OH 43229
16. Perimeter Lakes 1105 Schrock Road
Limited Partnership Columbus, OR 43229
17. Al & F.M. Schoby 6233 Post Road
.- Dublin, OR 43017
18. Snyder Development Co. 1652 w. 5th Ave.
Columbus, OK 43212
19. Residential Services, Inc. State Savings Co.
Properties & Subsidiaries
3800 W. Dublin-Granville Rd.
Dublin, OH 43017
20. Hospital Properties, Inc. Frank T. Panvorm II
3535 Olentanqy River Rd.
Columbus, OH 43214-0000
~i~
-Z I-z-
.
J~,
~_~ '~'_M_
" . ". ~ -- -...
.;~_l r/J' I
'. "'"~""I"''*'''~.''~'' ..'
,11Mi I
~ I
- --...,........"" IE"~-'" . .'
,1~ft~~~.~~~~~ ' . 1
;"",..:..~.p~f."'''~1 !
. _..(_--,.=;.._!!'......, " "'-- 5it.:-":-';"~: rrJ
'.:>i..-~;;r:>'''~-~'
~~",~ --.
~
'--1
l' ::J
':> ::. . ' Z
' ,
-. .'
.
~
EAST ELEVATION . <
SCALE: 118"=1'.-0"
" ~
.-..:...-:.' ". - .
-;......... ,- - ~.-
/1~~i..;... Z
. .. - ."
". ~~t:2~. -
. . . "i.' ~
-~.....-
"~ .;~.~~'t=-!:'" ';.
.' .. -...-.
. -~ ;"-' ":.
.
,-.
~.~-
l U)U)
.
~-;.. ~Z
... ~9
.-.. P-cE-!
.~~
. - . 8~
.. .. -.... -.._-
.- - --
-- - - . - -- -- ... ~ .' - . -_. ~~
.- .. ". ..--- ~
~-
..
., _. -- --.
) . .
) --
,
;~/t~i1~~~If1~1~~';~',' :':0 ~ SOUTH. ELEVATION
.-
. ,
~-:;'i~~~"~~~'~'~" ,.', " SCALE:"li8~=1' :-:-0":, .'
~-"'.i.:-,"",~~!.'<... _ 'f""4:' . ,.,. :'-J:.,>:Y'1"''''('''~':"'::--:'':''.:''!''- ~. .' ."'-.' .. '"
. , ,
,.".
,"~--,,~"<---~--,~-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - January 6, 1994
Page 13
CASE 4: Rezoning Application Z93-025 - Post Road Single-Family - Bell Property
APPLICANT: Bell Properties, Inc., c/o Thomas M. Bell, 5900 Roche Drive, Columbus, Ohio
43229.
REQUEST: To rezone 4.04 acres within two parcels located on the south side of Post Road,
approximately 400 feet east of Avery Road, from R-l, Restricted Suburban
r Residential District, to R-3, Suburban Residential District for the development of
10 single-family lots.
BACKGROUND:
The property was rezoned from LI, Limited Industrial District to R-1 in 1988 in association with
the Perimeter Center development plan. The R-1 designation was intended to provide transition
from the vast proposed retail space on the south, to the apartment use and the existing low
density residential north of Post Road. While the land is not zoned in one of the standard
planned districts, the proposed site development is subject to the review and approval of the
Planning and Zoning Commission. The site includes two parcels, separated by the retention
basin within the Perimeter Lakes apartment complex to the south.
This rezoning request for R-3, Suburban Residential District requires the submission of a
preliminary and final plat at a later date which shows exactly how the property is to be
developed. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make its recommendation on this
application and return it to City Council. The rezoning ordinance will be scheduled for a public
hearing and later for the City Council vote. A two-thirds vote will be needed to override the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. If approved, the proposal will again be reviewed
by the Planning Commission and Council under the preliminary and final platting procedures of
the subdivision regulations.
CONSIDERA TIONS:
0 The property immediately to the south includes the Perimeter Lakes apartment complex
which is zoned R-12, Urban Residential District. To the north, across Post Road, there
are existing single-family homes on large, estate lots zoned R-1, Restricted Suburban
Residential District. There are three vacant estate lots across from the eastern portion
of the subject site, which are zoned PUD as part of the Indian Run Meadow subdivision.
East of the site is a single-family residence (Schoby) zoned LI, Limited Industrial
District. To the west of the site, along the southeast comer of Post and A very Roads is
a vacant 2.6-acre parcel zoned LI.
0 The site is flat with little vegetation. It includes two separate parcels, each about two
acres. There is a drainage ditch along Post Road.
0 The proposal is for the development of 10 new single-family lots. Many of the neighbors
in the area support the proposal. The lots shown have a minimum width of 100 feet at
Post Road (R-3 requires only 80 feet), and lot depth of 170 feet. Lots #5 and #6 are pie-
shaped with narrower width along the rear. These lots should be reconfigured for an
overall total of eight lots. Additional lot widths is needed at east and west ends of the
development to provide sufficient area for a buffer.
.-~~",- -. ---~~~- ~._~<-- - '---'=~--""'-'-"-'='--""."~----"-"'''~-'
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - January 6, 1994
Page 14
0 The development standards for the R-3 district include restrictions on the lot area and
coverage (10,000 square feet per dwelling unit and only one principal structure per lot);
80-foot lot width at the building line; eight foot minimum sideyard and 18 feet combined
sideyards; and rear yard of 25 percent of the lot depth, up to 50 feet. This property
could be subdivided into 17.6 lots based on 10,000 square feet per lot or 12 lots based
on 80-foot minimum lot width. The development of 80-foot lots is not appropriate here
given the existing large, estate lots to the north and the collector function of Post Road.
/"'"" The actual layout will be determined at Preliminary Plat stage.
0 The closing of Post Road at the intersection of A very Road was discussed with the plans
for Perimeter Center. The plan adopted for that project provides for the reconstruction
of Post Road as a cul-de-sac, just east of A very Road. The Thoroughfare Element of the
Community Plan, however, includes Post Road as a thru-street with a collector
classification. The ultimate configuration of Post Road has not yet been determined.
0 Sufficient right-of-way needs to be dedicated to accommodate a potential future left turn
lane design at Avery Road, and 30 feet from centerline across the frontage of the site to
comply with the Thoroughfare Plan.
0 Driveway access to Post Road should be combined where possible to provide safe
vehicular movement for whatever time period that Post Road serves as a collector.
Ideally, access would be limited to two new driveways, one to the east of the pond and
one to the west. However, four curb cuts will be the maximum permitted for all
proposed lots. Driveway design should provide for safe turnaround movement so that
vehicles do not routinely back out onto Post Road.
0 The lots to the north of the site are setback 130 feet from the centerline of Post Road.
The house to the east (Schoby) is setback 130 feet from centerline of the road. The
proposal for the new lots includes a 40-foot building setback (70 feet from centerline).
This needs to be increased at least to 50 feet (80 feet at centerline) to be more in keeping
with the character of the area.
0 There is a ditch on the south side of Post Road. Regrading or enclosing the ditch needs
to be evaluated during the preliminary plat stage of this development.
0 The apartment buildings to the south are located 60 feet to the south of the southern
property line of this site. A landscape buffer was installed on the Perimeter Lakes
property a few years ago to provide screening for the future lots on the subject property
the existing lots on the north side of Post Road. The buffer includes mounding and a
combination of evergreen, ornamental, and shade trees. It is maintained by the Perimeter
Lakes owner. Additional screening is necessary along the west side of Lots #1 and #6,
and along the east side Lots #10 and #5.
0 The required park dedication as part of the platting procedure for this project is 1.358
acres. No parkland is proposed, and a fee in lieu of land is approximately $42,100,
based on the current $31,000 per acre cost contained in the Code.
0 Sidewalks are required by Code for all new development. However, in this case a
bikepath is preferred. A bikepath is included along this section of Post Road within the
Community Plan. The installation of an eight-foot bikepath along the frontage of this
property is needed. Additionally, a connection is needed between the two sections (on
the Perimeter Lakes property). There is an existing bikepath around the retention pond.
0 On-site detention is required for this site.
- ~'->~~-~.~- "
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - January 6, 1994
Page 15
0 This lot has access to the water and sewer systems which are currently in place in the
area, and sized adequately to handle this development proposal.
0 The developer has been working with the Post Road Residents Association on this
development and the association is generally in favor of the proposal.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions:
r Conditions:
1) That the appropriate park fee be paid to the City in the amount of $42,098;
2) That deed restrictions be submitted for review prior to construction or filing the
Final Plat, whichever comes first;
3) That the applicant dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way from centerline along Post
Road in conformance with the Community Plan;
4) That the applicant install an eight-foot bikepath along the south side of Post Road;
5) That Autumn Applause ashes be installed within a minimum seven-foot tree lawn;
6) That the number of lots be reduced to a maximum of eight;
7) That the setback along Post Road be increased to fit in appropriately with existing
development, to be determined at Preliminary Plat;
8) That curb cuts be consolidated and limited to a maximum of four driveways;
9) That the end lots be widened and a buffer consisting of substantial mounding and
plating be installed adjacent to Limited Industrial property (east and west lines).
Bases:
1) The rezoning application, as amended above, will provide for a continuation of
a similar residential pattern which exists to the north and meets the intent of the
Perimeter Center Plan.
2) The development is consistent with the Community Plan.
3) The plan as amended will provide for safe, non-vehicular traffic movement.
Considerations for Preliminary Plat Submittal:
1) The number of lots needs to be restricted to not more than eight lots and with
appropriate configuration given adjacent uses and zoning;
2) The number of curb cuts needs to be restricted to no more than four, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer;
3) A landscape buffer needs to be designed for the perimeter of all exterior lots to
the satisfaction of Staff;
4) An eight-foot bikepath should be installed along the south side of Post Road
including a connection through the Perimeter Lakes development project.
5) Existing topography, existing and utilities, and all rights-of-way and easements
need to be included on the preliminary plat.
6) A note needs to be added to the final plat before it is recorded stating that the
Dublin Thoroughfare Plan includes Post Road as a collector street to remain open.
Closing of that street will require a public hearing by City Council and their
affirmative vote. The issue will be reconsidered during the update of the
Community Plan.
",.--".~
\=- R~.V r -c~
PLR \,
g:;
" ."..
/'-" (
R-1
t -
~. pun
. PLI
' \
, \
\ PU
\
i -' --
\
Z _'
:\ I
I
PUD
::J\
I
""-
Ll
\\ PC,O -
d"';'-"'" -
~ cc
~-
------
..---
-1 ~
" --- -,'" #;
-,_.._-~~~~
./ - ....~..-'.-PUD
-- ,.. ~__L
\ i I
\ \ I
\ \ \ R J
/ \ OLR
r '\.
.. ,
\ , Rezoning Application N
~ Z93-025
, Bell Property
v. . I t3 4 'l':>..
n\'~/,"~
,
.__.-.~,.,..""o,,,_-"-,,~, " '"-,..~-,,- ~~-"--,,-~-~...
-"""'_''-'_,,____"''_0_ C. ---. .~- --
_.._.~"'~~..<L.>~..~~_;........-..__~"_,._-""""'-"'~~_~_",.,,.........,"""'"..,,_~."~~'-'~~-"-_,~_."_~-,C.;_..- '''''""--'''.-'''~''''''~,,",,,-~.''"'
... ,,"" ..-~'" COWWBUS lWMlVIILI: RD
'-
1\ ,-. . ~ 33 161
i
~
SHIER RINGS RD
, ...
PL
~" I
iiilJ.N ,
.._~,- ,,-.....- . -_...-,-:----...._,- ..
~i ~ .
~ DAN-SHERRl
~, J.VI
~~j :
.
~.
~) ~..
~~.~..
'-'- '-'- ~
~ ~
i
~ 1
I
/ roRPO.... ""'" I -
1 .,
~ Rezoning Application N
..~ ,-~~-~-t/ 5::~~~~~ Z93-025
Bell Property
"
'....t..
...~--. ~~j n nt " iF..-"
Gene Bostic, Fire Chief Emergency
766-2507 911
J. Robert Ross Business
Assistant Fire Chief 889-2347
764-1269 WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
John S. Sedlock, Captain FAX
Fire Prevention Bureau 614-766-2507
766-0857 Call Prior To Transmission
,.....
'~ 20 December 1993
Bobbie Clarke, Planning Director
City of Dublin
Department of Development
5131 Post Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Re: 6 January 1994
Planning Commission Meeting
Project: Bell Property
Rezoning Application Z93-025
Dear Bobbie,
I have reviewed the proposed plan for the Bell property and would
like to provide the following comment:
Whereas the decision of a Post Road cul-de-sac has not been made,
and the fire department is not in favor of such;
"'" I. The fire department has no objection to this project provided
Post Road remains open, however, I would respectfully request the
opportunity to participate at the public hearing for this project
and address our concerns in regard to providing fire and
emergency medical service to residents that may elect to build
there.
Specifically I would like to address the fire departments ability
to access these properties and the possibility of increased
response times.
SincerelY,1 . j '00 lli @ (0 'Iff .~ r"i:
~ll ' JeJkh
D -',Uil
CaPtain~n S. Sedlock, CFI II p Ii
:DEC 2 11993 lLJI
Fire Prevention Bureau
CITY OF DUBLIN
Rezoning Application
Fire Station No. 91 - 6255 Shier Rings Road, Dublin, ( Z93-025
Fire Station No. 93 - 5825 Brand Road, Dublin, Ohj Bell Property
..- ~=- --"," .
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - January 6, 1994
Page 11
7) That the storm water detention pond be designed to c eate a landscaped park-like setting at
the development's e anceway;
8) That a bikepath, b t to City standards, be ins ed along the south side of ost Road;
9) That 30 feet of . t-of-way be dedicated from enterline along Post Road
centerline alo Wilcox Road;
10) That existin plant material on the site w . h is to be relocated be p, tected immediately
with tern rary snow fencing to be plac at least 10 feet away fro the trunks;
,r 11) That t mechanicals be fully screen , and
12) Tha xterior fire protection features e reviewed and approved b the Washington Township
i F e Department.
...........
Mr. Geese seconded the motio The vote was as follows: r. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peplow,
yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; and Mr. Fishman, es. (Approved 5-0.)
4. Rezoning Application Z93-025 - Bell Property
Lisa Fierce presented this case and slides of the site. The subject site contains two parcels of
approximately two acres apiece. To the east and west are parcels zoned LI, Limited Industrial
District. The lots on the north side of Post Road are large estate lots zoned R -1, Restricted
Suburban Residential District. There is a buffer between this property and the Perimeter Lakes
Apartments. There are existing tree lines on both the east and west boundaries.
The request is for 10 new single-family lots within the R-3, Suburban Residential District. The
lots are shown with 100 feet of frontage (80 feet required) and approximately 170 feet of depth.
Staff believes that additional lot width is needed as a buffer at the east and west ends of the
development; the Code requires a minimum of 15 feet between residential and industrial areas.
Given the large estate lots across Post Road and the collector function of Post Road, the lots
should be limited to no more than 8 total lots for the entire development. The Community Plan
indicates Post Road as a through collector street. Staff believes driveways along the road should
be minimized and combined where possible. Staff supports a total of four curb cuts. The
existing homes in the area are set back at least 130 feet from the centerline. This proposal
shows a 40-foot setback (70 feet from centerline). An increased setback would be more in
character. Required park dedication is 0.52 acres for eight lots, not 1.358 as listed in the Staff
Report. For ten lots, 0.6 acres would be required. A fee in lieu of dedicated land is proposed,
being $16,145.00, based on eight lots.
Ms. Fierce said sidewalks are required by Code to be built by the developer. In this instance,
Staff recommends an eight-foot bikepath, instead of the sidewalk, to be installed to connect with
the Perimeter Lakes Apartment complex. Staff notes that a connection will be needed across
the Perimeter Lakes frontage between the subject tracts.
Ms. Fierce said the applicant met with Staff today. Staff can only support eight lots under an
amended application. Staff recommends that this request be amended to a R-2, Limited
Suburban Residential District, or a planned district with a maximum of eight lots. If so
amended, Staff recommends approval with the following nine conditions:
_..............---~-~--~,~-,~ ,"_gr_~' . ~---' " ~-...~~_. ~~__,"'J'~,"-=
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - January 6, 1994
Page 12
1) That the appropriate park fee be paid to the City, estimated as $16,145;
2) That deed restrictions be submitted for review prior to construction or filing the Final Plat,
whichever comes first;
3) That the applicant dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way from centerline along Post Road in
conformance with the Community Plan;
4) That the applicant install an eight-foot bikepath along the south side of Post Road;
5) That Autumn Applause ash trees be installed within a minimum seven-foot tree lawn;
I'" 6) That the number of lots be reduced to a maximum of eight;
7) That the setback along Post Road be increased to fit in appropriately with existing
........ development, to be determined at Preliminary Plat;
8) That curb cuts be consolidated and limited to a maximum of four driveways; and
9) That the end lots be widened and a buffer consisting of substantial mounding and planting
be installed adjacent to Limited Industrial property (east and west lines).
Thomas Bell, the applicant, said he agreed with the conditions in the Staff Report. He did not
like the number of curb cuts, but would do it if it were a safety issue. He would work with the
landscape people in regards to the planting plans and the bikepath. Mr. Bell said in order to
make the project feasible he needed ten lots. A reduction to eight lots made the project
unfeasible. He felt the lot size was very generous.
David Bromwich, owner of property across from the development, represented the Post Road
Residents Association. He said the property owners west of Wilcox Road all agreed with the
Staff recommendation of limiting the project to eight lots. The residents are mixed on a ten-lot
proposal. They want natural materials used on the front of the houses such as brick and stone.
The association agreed with the provisions of the warranty deed restrictions. They would like
concrete driveways. The residents question the effectiveness of the retention basin for storm
water run-off. It overflowed in the past and may be too small.
Chris Cline of 6060 Post Road said he worked on the rezoning negotiations that provided the
R-l lots. He felt the zoning change was appropriate in this case. During the rezoning
hearings, they expected that Post Road would be closed at A very Road, and houses were
expected in the $250,000 range. Single-family development is badly needed in the Post Road
area, and he is pleased with the proposal.
Mr. Schoby, a Post Road owner, said the treeline between his property and this one had
openings. He would like to have additional screening in those openings. Ms. Fierce said the
Code required a buffer between the two types of zoning needed to be 15 feet wide, have one
tree per 40 feet, and a six-foot high continuous screen of hedge, fence, wall, or mound.
Doris Dickinson of 6316 Post Road agreed with Staff's recommendations and preferred R-2
zoning because the density would be more in keeping with the neighborhood.
Ms. Clarke said historically many properties in Dublin have had legal descriptions that extend
to the centerline of the road. New lots being established are calculated exclusive of right-of-
way.
~ -~ ""'""""""
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - January 6, 1994
Page 13
Ms. Clarke said the current zoning (R-1) permits four units. Staff is willing to support a 100
percent density increase to eight units, but will not support a 150 percent increase to ten units.
Mr. Geese agreed with Staff on the R-2 issue and asked Mr. Bell to consider the reduction to
eight lots.
Mr. Kranstuber asked if the materials on the front of the building could be natural (brick and
.,.... stone). Mr. Bell said that would not be a problem to place 100 percent natural materials on the
front elevations.
-"""""
Mr. Geese asked Mr. Bell if concrete driveways would be a problem. Mr. Bell said it would
depend upon the setbacks.
Mr. Geese asked if Mr. Bell would agree to screen the Schoby property. Mr. Bell agreed.
Mr. Bell said he was open to discussion on the issue of concrete driveways. If R-2 was decided
upon, he would like to request tabling of his application to allow him to further discuss it with
Staff and the surrounding homeowners. Ms. Fierce stated that by Code a hard surface of asphalt
or concrete was required. Mr. Bell asked if nine lots would be allowed.
Mr. Peplow agreed that eight lots were desirable.
Mr. Fishman asked if Mr. Bell would agree to either eight lots or request a tabling. Mr. Bell
agreed to eight lots.
Mr. Banchefsky said the existing application requests R-3, and there was no provision for
limiting it to eight lots. He suggested that would be necessary to amend the rezoning request
to R-2 or PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District to reduce the density.
Mr. Geese moved that the rezoning application request be amended from R-3 to R-2.
Mr. Bell accepted the amendment even though he was not familiar with R-2 zoning. He asked
for an explanation of R-2. Ms. Clarke said an R-2 lot was a minimum of 100 feet wide and
20,000 square feet in area. Given the site's 170 feet of depth, the lots would have to be 117 feet
wide to meet the area requirement. Mr. Bell asked if it calculated out exactly as eight lots. Ms.
Fierce said it was slightly higher than eight lots, but because the site is two parcels, each would
yield four lots. Ms. Clarke asked for two motions, one to amend the application and a separate
motion to address the conditions of approval.
Mr. Fishman seconded Mr. Geese's motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Kranstuber, yes;
Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Application
amended to R-2; Approved 5-0.)
Mr. Geese then moved to approve this rezoning application with R-2 zoning with the ten
conditions as follows:
<2_'"""''''"'"-<1......... ~ "-~~~_~"""'.. -"
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - January 6, 1994
Page 14
1) That the appropriate park fee be paid to the City in the amount of $16,145;
2) That deed restrictions be submitted for review prior to construction or filing the Final Plat,
whichever comes first;
3) That the applicant dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way from centerline along Post Road in
conformance with the Community Plan;
4) That the applicant install an eight-foot bikepath along the south side of Post Road;
5) That Autumn Applause ash trees be installed within a minimum seven-foot tree lawn;
6) That the number of lots be reduced to a maximum of eight;
- 7) That the setback along Post Road be increased to fit in appropriately with existing
development, to be determined at Preliminary Plat;
8) That curb cuts be consolidated and limited to a maximum of four driveways;
9) That the end lots be widened and a buffer consisting of substantial mounding and planting
be installed adjacent to Limited Industrial property (east and west lines) including open areas
adjacent to Schoby property; and
10) That all natural materials be used on the fronts of all the houses.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Fishman. The vote was as follows: Mr. Kranstuber, yes;
Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Approved 5-0.)
Mr. Bell said if he couldn't make it work, he would withdraw his application prior to the
Council hearing.
5. Rezoning Application Z93-0 - Amended Preliminary Development Plan - JALL
Investments - McSwain C pets
Tom Rubey presented t . s case and slides of the ea. This is a revised A4'eliminary
Development Plan un the PUD, Planned Unit velopment regulations for""6,000 square
foot carpet store an a 19,250 square foot com cial building. The site is ,l-lacres located on
the south side 0 //
SR 161 west f Dublin Center Drive. e site is currently zone<VPUD, with a different
approved P. eliminary Development PI . The City is currently meparing plans for widening
SR 161. he proposed right-of-way' the Community Plan iy.{2 f~t, requiring a dedication/"
here 0 6 feet from the centerli . /,/ ///
The Designer Shoe Wareho c e is just to the east, and 0acres of the site is vacant, zoqed/PUD
for office, retail, or res rant uses. Three schem ~it~ 'p1ans are currently approyed'for these
uses. A new develoQ ent text has been submi which details the proposal. ,'The twelve acre
site is divided int ree separate phases. ase I is the existing Designer/Shoe Warehouse.
Phase II is the edical Foundation pre tly under construction on 3.~/a~res and Phase III is
the undevelop 5.1 acre site. The . oposal is for construction of t\V'0 retail buildings on the
/ /
vacant site. West of the Designe hoe Warehouse is the propo~6,000 square foot McSwain
carpet store and further west i e 19,250 square foot buildin oesignated for commercial uses.
The setback for the propo buildings will between 1 and 150 feet consistent with the
structures to the east and est. All buildings will sh the existing right-in/right-out curb cut
at the center of the site. No additional curb cuts are proposed. Parking for the entire 12-acre
'_~"""~,~.--'.-..-.. --'"-'
~~nutes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 6
Mr. Amorose moved for approval of this rezoning application with the following
condi tions:
l. Screening mechanism to ed prior to going
2. Refinement of the tree vation plan at time of Final lopment Plan;
3. Entry feature design street tree spacing and species o be coordinated
with Landscape Plan at Final Development Plan.
~... 4. Street tree pIa ing to be done according to the L as
ude nursery grown trees.
"I~ Mr. Reiner s onded the motion and the vote was a follows: . Mr. Berlin, yes;
Ms. Rausch yes, but noted that she is unhappy out condition #4; Mr. Jezerinac,
yes, als noted that he is not in agreement w. h condition #4; Mr. Amorose, yes;
Mr. Geese', yes; Mr'- Reiner, yes; Mr. Grace,
3. Rezoning Application 287-010 - Perimeter Mall
Ms. Clarke showed the Commission slides of the subject area. In doing so she pointed
out areas that were proposed for various land uses; R-I residential and offices uses
along Post Road; office, laboratory and research uses in the eastern interior portion;
and commercial, multi-family and institutional uses on the western half.
She told Commission both interior roadways over to Wilcox Road would be completed as
part of the first phase of development. Staff has been working with two traffic
engineers on the traffic concerns of this application.
Land Use - Freeway Frontage - uses to be suburban office and office, laboratory and
research limited to buildings of two stories in height or more.
The main commercial area will be on 35 acres within the proposed roads. Sub Area E
along Avery Road contains most of the commercial outlots. Most of the zoning text
is devoted to wording that is to standardize architecture on the lots to accomplish
a consistent residential look; to soften the entry along Avery Road. The eastern
Post Road frontage will have SO and OLR uses only. The western portion will have
~~. single family. Area C has the most variety of designated uses including SO, OLR
and some Industrial use.
Ms. Clarke then highlighted some recent text changes. Changes were made to increase
a bike path commitment and also to make the text consistent with the submitted plans.
Ms. Clarke also pointed out that the plan also addresses pedestrian circulation by
including sidewalks.
Overall the zoning accomplishes many goals:
l. It proposes compatible land uses; gets rid of industrial uses.
2. It greatly reduces traffic on Post Road.
3. The plan provides a consistent landscape buffer along Post Road to be installed
with the development.
4. It fulfills the thoroughfare plan by building two-thirds of the proposed east/
west road between Avery and Coffman.
5. Applicant has agreed to work with Dublin in accomplishing needed capital improve-
ments on Avery Road. Staff recommends that Dublin and the developer agree on a
plan that builds the road in a final form.
Rezoning Application
Z93-025
Bell Property
, -"-,.~-,,~--,,--,,----,-,....-"~--
r'-~J
Minutes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 7
Ms. Clarke advised the Commission that the new PCD zoning district was unlike the
PUD in that it does not afford the same latitude in reviewing final development
plans. If there are to be provisions that are appropriate they, should be included
as part of the rezoning.
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
l. That the developers resolve transportation issues prior to zoning, including
,-,. agreement to dedicate right~of-way, timing of roads, cooperation with bikeway
extension over U.S. 33, funding of an agreement upon improvements.
~.. 2. That architecture of retail component will be unified and coordinated with the
out parcels.
3. That all necessary corrections be made to text and plans prior to Council,
including additional information on multi-family area.
4. That'timing is determined for landscaped buffers, and landscape materials are
coordinated between projects and with Dublin's Landscape Planner at Final
Development Plan.
Mr. Bowman then addressed the Commission.
Staff has been working closely with two traffic engineers over the last month, and
have considered several alternatives to the street system in making the project work.
The major assumptions/constraints are:
l. The uses proposed are much safer than the Limited Industrial uses that are now
permitted on the site.
2. The area is already developing and in need of a completed roadway system.
3. All plans were to de-emphasize Post Road.
After having gotten into the studies, staff found that:
l. Given the high peak volumes - primarily due to the proposed office traffic -
there has to be two access points onto Avery Road (Post has already been
1"""" eliminated).
2. Modifications will have to be made to the existing Avery Road interchange.
3. The I-270/U.S. 33 ramp is approaching capacity.
Alternatives suggested:
l. Bending Avery Road into the site, hooking on Muirfield Drive.
2. Traffic circles.
3. Service roads.
4. A second interchange on Perimeter Drive.
At an earlier meeting with the P & Z subcommittee, Staff was asked to explore this
interchange alternative. On the face, the proposal looks inviting; however, Staff
does not rerommend this alternative because of the following reasons:
l. Its cost far outweighs its benefits.
2. It requires the Av..ery. ~Qad Interchange to be completed at more expense.
3. It is simply too close to the Avery Interchange to eliminate weaving problems
and other traffic conflicts.
4. The interchange transfers the potential problem to Perimeter Drive which in
the long run may have a greater traffic volume than Avery Road.
5. It represents an additional pedestrian and visual barrier.
Rezoning Application
Z93-025
Bell Property
,~ .' I
Mi~utes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 8
If Dublin is to be extravagantwithi~ roadway dollars at all, staff would strongly
recommend that the City work toward providing new outlets over the limited access
barriers.
The study done by Wilbur Smith and Associates indicates that an extension of Coffman
Road over U.S. 33 down to the proposed interchange of Tuttle would draw as much
as 35 percent of traffic from 1-270. This proposal achieves two things: 1) it
draws traffic from Avery Road; and 2) it helps relieve congestion at Frantz Road
and the 1-270 interchange. Staff strongly recommends that this overpass be con-
structed and will strongly pursue this recommendation with Council.
"'0'4.",,,," As to the growth of Dublin beyond the present corporate limits in the north, Staff
believes that:
l. The O'Shaughnessy Bridge becomes more important.
2. A roadway system as an alternative to Muirfield Drive must be planned and
implemented to direct traffic away from our existing access points and to
new access routes or underutilized access areas:
-Hyland Croy and the Post interchange for example.
-New interchange on U.S. 33 west and north of Dublin.
-More bridges over the Scioto north of Glick Road.
To summarize, Staff believes that:
l. The roadway system in this application has been vastly improved since the
Commission last saw it.
2. The new traffic improvements that we will deal with as part of the Riverside
Hospital application improve the traffic flow of this application.
3. This solution is adequate and practical in the sense that effective, long-term
improvements to the Avery interchange to U.S. 33 can be implemented when needed
or budgeted.
4. Dublin must pursue the Coffman extension.
5. Developer commitments to improve Avery Road should be sufficient for a number
of years enabling Dublin to prepare the long-term improvements.
~"fj'''''
Mr. Grace then asked Mr. BOw~an to summarize the various traffic alternatives that
were studied. Mr. Bowman explained the alternatives as follows:
1. A new concept of rerouting Avery Road so that it intersects with Perimeter
Drive. This greatly helps the large afternoon peak traffic volume. This
alternative was found to be overly committal if the assumptions are wrong.
Staff decided to keep to the existing roadway.
2. A three-tiered loop for the afternoon peak.
3. A series of traffic circles around Avery Road.
4. A service road concept.
5. A full-blown replica of the Avery Road/U.S. 33 interchange. This
alternative would require 28 acres with improvement costs above five (5)
million dollars plus land costs. There still would be signals on Perimeter
Drive. Mr. Bowman said that he did not know how effective the solution would
be; however, the interchange would be of poor visual quality as an entrance
into this area of Dublin.
Rezoning Application
Z93-025
Bell Property
- ~,,,_.",.,,,"-,<,,,><. .
Minutes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 9
Mr. Grace asked Mr. Bowman to compare the Staff recommended plan with the inter-
change alternative. Mr. Bowman said that the recommended plan has an access to
the Riverside Hospital site directly across the northern Avery interchange ramp.
This will eliminate left turns into Riverside Hospital at the first northbound
signal from the interchange.
By an area analysis of traffic, Coffman Road extension over U.S. 33 eliminates
f""" the need for so many lanes on AV~JY Road. If Avery Road were constructed with
the additional lanes under the assumption that the Coffman Road extension would
not be built, and then the ext~~sion were later made; the additional lanes
on Avery Road would yield a higher service level.
The commitments within the limited access must be made as part of the Riverside
Hospital application, not the Perimeter rezoning. This does not preclude longer
term improvements to the Avery interchange.
Mr. Jezerinac asked Mr. BOwman if he knew what the service level of the inter-
change proposal was. Mr. Bowman did not know.
Mr. Jezerinac asked Mr. Bowman to describe level of service E. Mr. Bowman said
that the road would be at full capacity.
In a discussion of accepted design levels, Mr. Jezerinac mentioned a conversation
he had with an engineer from Barton Ashman, wherein he was told that Barton Ashman
designs to service level C without being conservative or overly expensive. Mr.
Jezerinac said that service level E was failure, the lowest possible service level,
and asked if this is what we want for our community? Mr. Bowman explained that the
situation was a function of land use, not traffic design. These proposed uses
generate a lot of traffic; we cannot make the streets overly large or cumbersome to
handle peak times.
Mr. Grace asked wha t 'Would bring the streets to level of service C. Mr.
Bowman said that there was no practical traffic solution to bring it to level C.
Only a change in land use would reduce traffic congestion.
Mr. Reiner asked if staff had asked the traffic engineer to design to a higher
service level. Mr. Bowman said that no other concepts seemed practical. The
high afternoon peak did not justify any additions for the 23 hours that the road
will work at service level E or better.
Mr. Reiner expressed concern that the Coffman extension may someday be congested
and of little use in moving traffic from Avery Road. Mr. Bowman said that he was
hopeful that the merger with Washington Township would give Dublin the ability to
plan and control land uses.
Ms. Rausch said that she was still concerned about growth in Union County and to
the north, causing added congestion.
Mr. Harrison Smith spoke on behalf of the applicants, saying that the facts of the
zoning are as follows:
i 1. The property is zoned. This application represents an upzoning, moving from the
\ bottom up. (reference to pyramid zoning concept)
2. The commercial zoning request reduces the peak traffic jmn~ct. Retail does not
affect the traffic movements in the morning. Rezoning Application
Z93-025
Bell Property
,-,-~,-~".~-~=,-=-=~;-"~,---,- ~~,-...., ~ tLjj' 'ilTI" ~
Mir.utes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 10
Mr. Smith compared the subject site to the Sawmill Road area. The intense
traffic area on Sawmill is five times the size of the subject site and 16 times
the size of the commercial area alone. He then made a comparison with the Lane
Avenue Shopping Center. Lane Avenue, like Perimeter, is similar in that it is
the disposable income in the area that makes it attractive, not so much the number
of people. Mr. Smith described what he believed to be the traffic situation at
Lane Avenue versus the Perimeter proposal. He said that Perimeter is not a
catastrophe, but an opportunity waiting to happen.
- -
With reference to architecture, Mr. Smith said that since the applicants could
not articulate the proposed architecture in a text, they then agreed to give the
Commission full review power.
Mr. Smith detailed recent changes to the text as follows:
l. Page 3, paragraph 3 - loop roads constructed as part of initial phase.
Changes were made to create more storage and to permit more traffic to get
in.
2. Commitment to construct bike path when required.
3. Landscape buffer to be developed.
4. Change property owners name in the text to be the same as on the maps.
5. Clarification on exact function and placement of signage for out parcels.
Mr. Smith then read the revised portion of the text dealing with architectural
review. He added that the applicant proposes that the Planning Commission be
granted the right to determine what the non-commercial appearance in certain areas
will eventually be.
Mr. Smith then returned to the traffic discussion by referring specifically to
the Perimeter interchange alternative. He said that it would require a seven-
lane bridge over Avery Road and eight lanes on Avery Road. The cost would be
five to six million dollars, not including land costs. The major disadvantage
of the interchange is that all the traffic must use,the ramp. In the A.M., all
? 400 acres including the hospital site must use the same ramp; an accident would
cause a complete breakdown because there is no other way in.. ' In the P.M. , the
problem would be even worse; all traffic must use the same ramp out. Mr. Smith
then showed renderings of what the interchange proposal would look like versus
the non-interchange alternative. There was a lengthy discussion of traffic over
the same issues and points made previously.
Mr. Mark Magalotti of Wilbur Smith and Associates then introduced himself and
explained that he had been hired by Riverside Hospital to prepare a traffic report.
Mr. Magalotti discussed traffic service levels. He told the Commission that the
definition of level of service has changed over the last couple of years. Refer-
ring to the Appendix of a report completed for the hospital, he said that the
level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay.
Level of service A - describes operations with very low delay, less than 5 seconds
per vehicle.
Level of service B - 5 to 15 seconds per vehicle.
Level of service C - 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle.
Level of service D - 25 to 40 seconds per vehicle.
Level of service E - 40 to 60 seconds delay per vehicle.
Level of service F - over 60 seconds delay per vehicle.
Mr. Magalotti described level of service E at 40 to 60 secon~c rlo1~1T ~Q ho;no l~QQ
than one cycle length of a traffic signal. He said this was
state departments of transportation, major cities and local Rezoning Application
Z93-025
Bell Property
"'"''''_''"_~'_'''~;_'C~_-_~_ -
. '
Minutes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 11
Mr. Magalotti explained that the old version of the highway manual calculated level
of service on a volume to capacity relationship. Level of service C in the old
report is comparable to level of service E in the new manual. His report recommends
a design that achieves level of service E at the signalized intersections. I twill
produce average delays of one cycle length of the signal which is considered to be
acceptable.
Mr. Magalotti then explained how the Coffman Road extension could provide an
,..... additional level of service on Avery Road. In response to a question by Mr. Grace,
he explained the improvements to Avery Road that were recommended in his report.
'-"
Mr. Jezerinac questioned the validity of the traffic projections made in the Wilbur
Smith report.
Mr. Reiner asked if cars would back up all the way down the Avery Road ramp onto
U.S. 33/S.R. 161. Mr. Magalotti replied that the ramp would have new lanes to
help queuing. Also a free-flow, right-turn lane would reduce stacking.
Ms. Rausch asked about Dublin's abIlity to implement alternatives if the worst-
case situation arose. Mr. Magalotti said that an at-grade traffic solution has
an advantage over a grade-separated proposal in that the Edwards rezoning at Tuttle
Road already committed the first section of the Coffman Road extension. The
traffic capacity from the west to Tuttle Road is great.
Mr. Smith then told the Commission that he estimates the cost of needed initial
improvements to Avery Road at nearly one million dollars. Although he could not
commit to a dollar figure now, he said that if the City were able to supply
materials that the developers would do as much as they can. A private improvement
contract would make the money go much farther and would get results more quickly.
Mr. Smith agreed that he would not complete the zoning until they have actually
entered into an agreement with the City on the cost of the improvements.
,,,.. Jim Stoycheff, a Dublin resident, questioned the applicant's willingness to pay
the cost of improvements to the roadway system. He also cited an impact fee study
done by the law firm of Siemen, Tarson and Purdy, that would require a 1,000 room
hotel to pay $914,000 in traffic impact fees. He said more must be done for Dublin.
Mr. Smith reaffirmed his commitment to enter into an agreement with Dublin covering
the cost of Avery Road improvements. Dublin may say they are not going to contri-
bute, so our decision will be payor go away. Mr. Smith also pledged his help and
the help of his clients in approaching the State of Ohio to work toward solving
the problem.
Mr. Chris Cline of the Post Road Residents' Association; Ms. Kathy Erickson of the
Hemingway Residents' Association; Ms. Karen Zent, trustee of the Indian Run Meadow
Residents' Association; all spoke favorably of the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Bob Foley of White Consolidated Industries urged approval so the roads could
be completed.
Mr. Bill Riat, on behalf of Newtowne and Sullivan, Gray, Riat Architects, told the
j Commission that they are committed to do a good job on the multi-family portion of
the site.
Jeff Wilkens of Discovery Systems spoke in favor of the rez, Rezoning Application
Z93-025
AfII'I'Io, Bell Property
~ "- - ,"--"
11 ,.... '~'~"ii'li- '''t' --iii'
Minutes of Meeting, June 9, 1988
Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 12
Mr. Steve Rick, director of Construction and Real Estate of Big Bear Stores, said
his firm is a potential tenant in Perimeter Mall.
Vince Rakestraw, a Dublin resident, asked the Commission to approve the rezoning
while the economy is still good.
Mr. Robert Albright, attorney representing Charles Snyder, an adjoining property
r owner, spoke in favor and infor~~d the Commission that Mr. Snyder will develop
an L.I. use on his land.
......... Ms. Barbara Maurer, City Council member and Chairman of the Land Use Committee,
informed the Commission that the Coffman extension is on the approved Capital
Improvements Program. She also cited a list of Limited Industrial uses that
are now permitted on the site.
Mr. Berlin moved to approve the application with the following conditions:
l. That the developers resolve transportation issues prior to zoning, including
agreement to dedicate right-of-way, timing of roads, cooperation with bikeway
extension over U.S. 33, funding of an agreement upon improvements.
2. That architecture of retail component will be unified and coordinated with the
out parcels.
3. That all necessary corrections be made to text and plans prior to Council,
including additional information on multi-family area.
4. That timing is determined for landscaped buffers, and landscape materials are
coordinated between projects and with Dublin's Landscape Planner at Final
Development Plan.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Grace, yes;
Mr. Reiner, no; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr. Jezerinac, no, and noted 1)he is not convinced
that E is the appropriate service level--it should be C, 2) he is not convinced the
reports are accurate, and 3) the Coffman Road extension is needed although it is
not part of this proposal; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Geese, abstain
due to conflict.
Mr. Jezerinac stated that Commission has a rule about not starting another case
after 11:00 p.m. and made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Ms. Rausch seconded
the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, no; Mr. Jezerinac, yes;
Mr. Berlin, no; Ms. rausch, yes; Mr. Geese, no; Mr. Reiner, no; Mr. Grace, no.
The motion being denied, the chairman called for a five minute recess.
4. Corridor Development District C88-OO8 - Dublin Village Center (Entrance
Identification/Signs)
Ms. Clarke presented slides and the lowing information:
-Two entry identification point discussed. Location "A" wi sign
which bears the copy "Dubl' illage Center" to be located off the Bank
One site. Location IIBII II be the creation of a median Federated Boulevard
and Sawmill Road and/ onstruction of a clock tower. . Clarke showed the
Commission signs ~hat have been approved for AMC ater and another Dublin
Village Center sign located in front of the Hun ngton Bank site.
\
Rezoning Application
Z93-025
.- Bell Property