The URL can be used to link to this page

67-91 Ordinance - - -..-------- RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043 I I Ordinance NO'H _6].-9J.__u_ Passed.. __..._mm" OOO.UU__"_ 000000.19 I -+--~ I I ,-. \.-. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING OF AN 85.236 ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BRAND ROAD AND THE EAST SIDE OF ASHBAUGH ROAD. TO BE REZONED FROM: R-1, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO: PLR, PLANNED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ~DAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached legal description marked Exhibit" A"), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances), ..,...... the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. \ f Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of "- contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Attest: r ~-- ~ ~ s'e~ \t\ \\\e , L Clerk of Council ~e~e ~\) . -\ to~9. , . "'~\l s~. ,. "",.."..,,~ t\.'. ~ ., '0' ,. ,:<l Sponsor: Planning Division .~~~,(\.' ",\\)\\:.:." \ l\)' . ',\. 'J'V\. ~~ \\)u . r" 'i'l.." ~'1 tl\~ \ tQ{i\\i~.J \ "'~, X \\ ,\\ nt: \ 'i)\)\) , I tWI a {l-. 0\\\0 .~ \)u\)\\\\' ~ toU\\t\ , I tW\O I - ~._.~_._.._~.~-~" __"_""}\;l'.J :.-.Itf:TiJ,' ."1 - .. .Ie "t. \---~'--y ~ plm ' ' r ~ ",' \ 'L:. _ '\ ' ' ,- I 1- \ --- ~~ ~~ ~ ~\?I \l\ - -< \ \ ...t' ........-:::: \ . /"'\..,' \ ~ ""5 ~3f ~ - ' \ ' ~ ~ \~- I' . ~. \ .~ ::2 '" 7( ~ PUD ~~[~ \ ,-.~,V ~- 2 · " PUD ~ "..., ~ _.. "- D A I ' ~ , /_ ~ ,\~ ..' ~ ~ E.' ' (\ C 0 L ~ -, ~ PI..I1..r.~ --- '=/" " ' <; I ~~ "." , "PUD '" RI' ""~ l' ~~,\ \~,' ,~ \,~\ \ .' ~. \ \-' - . R'~ x=v ,( ~~ - ~~~,~ .~ PUD ' ' I. '..! " ' ',,,,, ~, ~ \ \ ~. / . . --:'" - ..~ ',' .0:'\m,,~~-~'1:~ .... ~,.' ~ :I illI'\ \ "::: \)3 ~' ,.'" ~ '\S:~~ \ '\ R:}/~ :~,' ,~' ~ \;1 " Iff -'---- ,S,\e. '\" ~~ PUD ~ \, 1\1 ( ~u,A' ~ \ ' I " UD " . '" 'W IT)" ~ I\\: \ --':.':,' .-"V;!2~';;'" f'W';-- -,\\- _.~~ V' ~ . \~ \,...' ---1 PUD :;-- V ~ ~ 1 ~-L, ' '~ ~ , I \ ", ,-( - 1 R.J \'\ I '~ /" '-"-' I ' --\\ -., ~ ~ R 1 ' ~, ' i R.1 ' U" " - ~' '. ~::: '---l I., r= > c: ,-' '11~!1 '- .. I ~~JD . -'~~' ~" ~- ~ ' , ~ _,;- ~ t , r R.2 '" ' ,', 11 L R \' - .::::. PU 0 : .. "" " · 1L ~' f~V II ~ '=rl\ ,--1 pUD J ~\lQ : .?J f.. ~ ~. ~ \~ > \ N \. PUD~r \q /= ~\ \~I 1 . ,1/ PUD ~.J _~ _I PUD ~ 0 ,_ \~,' ~.!':' ' 1 '-' R-I~ ...... '- - I R-'V~ !C ~. _-jlL>K . R pCD "~~" peD \ \ ~ ~ " -~ '8 " \ 'll 1:. 0.. \ - 005 ~ _ _ - ( J') ~cc lP -m~ "'~,_.."-~"-------.,,.. ----'..,',..,,~..~- -' I I I February 7, ! 1992 i DESCRIPTION OF 86.775 ACRES I NORTH OF BRAND ROAD, EAST OF ASHBAUGH ROAD I CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO I situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of DUblin, being a part of Virginia Military Survey No. 2544, being all of that land as described in a deed to Elizabeth Ellen Cook, of record in Official Records Volume 6717, Page A17, all references being to the records in the Recorder's Office, I Franklin County, Ohio, and being more particularly described as , follows: .",....,.. I Beginning at a railroad spike found at the centerline intersection of Brand Road, 60.00 feet in width, and Ashbaugh '",,,.,,, I Road, 60.00 feet in width, said spike also being the southeasterly corner of that 6.313 acre tract of land as Idescribed in a deed to Richard A. Coulter, of record in Deed Book 2365, Page 694; Thence North 10 43' 11" West, along the centerline of Ashbaugh Road, passing a railroad spike at the northeasterly I corner of said 6.313 acre tract at 527.48 feet, a total distance of 1642.31 feet to a railroad spike found at the southwesterly II corner of that 59.864 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Muirfield Village Golf Club, of record in Official Records t I Volume 10776, Page H16; Thence North 880 33' 10" East, along the southerly line of said 59.864 acre tract, a distance of 1994.84 feet to an iron pin found at the southeasterly corner of same and in the westerly line of Lot 33 of River Forest, a subdivision of record in Plat Book 28, Page 46; Thence South 170 31' 52" East, along said westerly line, a distance of 206.79 feet to an iron pin found at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 33; ....... II Thence South 170 53' 01" East, along the westerly lines of ,. I Lots 34 and 35, along the westerly line of The Woods of DUblin, I section 3, a subdivision of record in Plat Book 66, Page 80 and - along the westerly line of Treetops at Brandon Condominium, of record in Condominium Plat Book 43, Page 26, a distance of 1722.58 feet to an iron pin set at the northeasterly corner of Brandon section 2, Phase 1, a subdivision of record in Plat Book 66, Page 33; ! Thence North 820 38' 22" West, along the northerly line of I said Brandon section 2, Phase 1 and along the northerly line of I Brandon section 2, Phase 2, a distance of 1873.83 feet to an iron pin found in the northerly line of that 3.392 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Ronald L. Geese, of record in Official Records Volume 2012, Page B03; Thence South 730 45' 23" West, along said northerly line, a, distance of 548.74 feet to a railroad spike found at the most I westerly corner of said 3.392 acre tract and in the centerline of I Brand Road; ---- I Thence North 680 58' 25" West, along said centerline, a I distance of 161.73 feet to the place of beginning and containing 86.775 acres of land. I ~.:!...i'\c,. i Bearings herein are based on the referenced plats of Brandon IF . Subdivision. II< ,,'~. Iron pin set consists of a 1" iron pipe, (O.D.) 30" long with a plastic cap inscribed "M-E ENG". I This description was prepared by M-E Engineering, Inc., civil Division, based on information obtained from an actual field survey of the premises in December, 1991. ill ~ @ DIn @ FEB 7 1992 ~ CITY OF 1!J)OO~PN/9 :l306986.775/7i Ii "'~."~~ N . . Subject property in the names of Elizabeth E. and Donald S. Cook Tax Map 0-107-B, Tax Parcel No. 273-583, 85.236 acres Adjacent Landowners: 1. Richard L. Coulter, 12/7/61, 6.313 acres, 273-423 6100 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 2. Ronald L. Geese and Anne Farmer Geese, 7/31/89, 3.392 acres, 273-581 5964 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 3. Planned Communities Development Co. acquired 11/20-85, 19.3623 acres 273-581 150 Vest Yilson Bridge Road Yorthington, Ohio 43085 4. Lee A. and Karla Vermeer, 9/7/88 273-371 6001 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 5. Village of Dublin, Ohio, 10/27/87, 26.789 acres 273-4183 6665 Coffman Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 6. Jack and Ruth E. Strader, 4/28/89, 1 acre 273-1440 2550 Brixton Road . Columbus, Ohio 43221 7. Muirfield Village Golf Club, 11/16/87, 38.007 acres, 273-593 P. O. Box 565 Dublin, Ohio 43017 MAP N88CC 8. Patrick A. & Kay E. McNally, 4/2/91, Lot 126 273-3773 7741 Crawley Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 9. Yilliam E. and Darlene R. Leshnock, 7/8/88, Lot 127 273-3774 7750 Crawley Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 RIVER FOREST SUBDIVISION, MAP N88 10. Gregory A. and B. Roberts, 11/9/83, Lot 31 273-481 5557 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 11. Mark G. and C. H. Tuttle, 5/2/84, Lot 32 273-482 5549 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 12. George J. Gianakopoulos, 5/2/90, Lot 33 273-483 5541 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 13. Yilliam M. and Sarah C. Knauf, 8/28/87, Lot 34 273-484 5533 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 14. Edward J. and S. J. Russell, 7/24/90, Lot 35 273-485 5525 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 1 of 8 ,. , 'iO. r 1 'I ~ L-'lilllll. '" , ^.~",_-,-"~_.'~-'_.~',"--'-- ~"-,--...-- .. . 15. Michael D. and Donna D. Killian, 8/4/83, Lot 36 273-486 5517 Ashford Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 THE WOODS OF DUBLIN SECTION 3, MAP N88CCC 16. Joe Y. and Sue Harden, 3/7/90, Lot 56 273-3980 5799 Rushwood Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 17. Jodell M. Everhart, 3/2/89, Lot 57 273-3981 5806 Rushwood Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 BRANDON SECTION 2, PHASE 1, MAP N88GGGG 18. James D. and Erin K. Bishop, 10/20/89, Lot 131 273-3778 5458 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 19. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 132 273-3779 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 20. James E. and Barbara S. Jones, 12/31/90, Lot 133 273-3780 5442 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 21- Charles D. and P. A. Dudgeon, 3/29/88, Lot 134 273-3781 5434 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 22. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. ,~' acquired 6/27/88, Lot 135 273-3782 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 23. Steven L. and Susan M. White, 8/16/89, Lot 136 273-3783 5418 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 . 24. Philip R. and Susan J. Zuroweste, 5/17/88, Lot 137 273-3784 5410 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 25. John S. and Cheryl S. Banner, 3/23/90, Lot 138 273-3785 5402 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 26. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 139 273-3786 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 27. M/I Schottenstein HOmes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 140 273-3787 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 4t~ 28. Morris R. and Barbara Hyde Berrong, 3/12/90, Lot 141 273-3788 5378 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 29. John R. and Annette N. Poeppelman, 4/3/90, Lot 142 273-3789 5370 Brandonway Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 2 of 8 ""..--,,~~' --~ --~~";~ . ~' HI ~! -~ . MAP N88HH 30. Muirfield Greene Co., 17.603 acres, 273-3211 c/o Bob Webb Builders 7662 North Central Drive Westerville, Ohio 43081 TREETOPS AT BRANDON CONDOMINIUMS, MAP T-56 . 31- Ronald G. and Mary L. Ferrell Unit 1 273-4245 7779 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 32. Elvood A. and Edith S. Chinsley Unit 2 273-4246 7771 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 33. Ned B. and Geraldine A. Wheeler and Mildred R. Paloncy 7763 Bartles Avenue Unit 3 273-4247 Dublin, Ohio 43017 34. Dale Campion Unit 4 273-4248 7755 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 35. John G. and Marilyn L. Allen Unit 5 273-4249 7787 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 36. William A. and Jean McCabe Loughman Unit 6 273-4250 7795 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 37. John E. Geuss Unit 7 273-4251 7803 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 38. Gloria C. Tuttle Unit 8 273-4252 7811 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 39. George R. and Barbara J. Mallory Unit 9 273-4253 7819 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 40. Donald C. and Yoetle M. Hopkin Uni t 10 273-4254 7827 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 41- Hugh T. and JoAnn Miller Unit 11 273-4255 7835 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 42. Paul H. and M. A. Hellinger Unit 12 . 273-4256 7851 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 43. William F., Jr. and Patricia S. Ashburn Unit 13 273-4257 7955 Levis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 44. Richard M. and Bernadette A. Cusak Unit 14 273-4258 \if"",,'''''' 7963 Levis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 45. James A. and Christina K. Rieser Unit 15 273-4259 7971 Levis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 3 of 8 . .~>._~-.....~.., .'.' -~.p. ,~- . . 46. Marcia B. Daneman Unit 16 273-4260 7979 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 47. Leslie R. and Marge A. Hinzmann Unit 17 273-4261 7987 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 48. John S. and Mary D. Vyatt Uni t 18 273-4262 7995 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 49. Peggy A. Miller Unit 19 273-4263 7998 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 50. Robert J. and K. L. Pudelski Unit 20 273-4264 7990 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 51. Margaret J. Vallace Unit 21 .. 273-4265 7982 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 52. Catherine Berry Unit 22 273-4266 7974 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 53. Barbara J. Agne Unit 23 273-4267 7966 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 54. George H. and Janet M. Fullerton Unit 24 273-4268 7958 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 55. Toni L. Cialella Unit 61 273-4269 7784 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 56. Joseph, Jr. and Anthony J., Sr. Aulino Unit 62 273-4270 7776 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 57. Borror Corporation Unit 63 273-4271 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 58. Kenneth R. and Kathryn V. Good Unit 64 273-4272 7760 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 59. Kathleen Gilliland Unit 65 273-4273 7816 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 60. Blase P. and Maureen Deleo Unit 66 273-4274 7808 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 ,.~'~ 61. LeeAnn V. Harding Unit 67 273-4275 7800 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 62. Michael E. and Ellen E. Douglass Unit 68 273-4276 7792 Bartles Avenue . Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 4 of 8 '_'__"_=_~O__~_ . . -=.00 ~..- . ~,~,""" ;;-,'t.l..A:--n''"j' :l:r ' ':"' r . . 63. Thomas P. Brundige Unit 69 273-4277 7848 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 64. John A. and Sally J. Ubbing Unit 70 273-4278 7840 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 (is. Eric L. and Margaret E. Lyon Unit 71 273-4279 7832 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 66. Anthony A. Fata Uni t 72 273-4280 7824 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 67. Ned B. and Geraldine A. Wheeler Unit 73 273-4281 7880 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 68. Patricia A. Wiese Unit 74 273-4282 7872 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 69. James T. and Martha R. Holden Unit 75 273-4283 7864 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 70. Borror Corporation Unit 76 273-4284 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 71- Nancy S. Diesem Unit 45 . 273-5338 7870 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 72. Harold L. Smith Unit 46 273-5339 7862 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 73. Robert C. and Mary B. Byers Unit 47 273-5340 7854 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 73. Kazuo and Yuko Hisaki Unit 48 273-5341 7846 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 74. Coleman J. and Marjorie S. Major, Trustees Unit 49 273-5342 7838 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 75. Henry A. and Mary D. Baker Unit 50 273-5343 7830 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 76. M. Vivian McKenzie Unit 51 273-5344 7822 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 77. Donald A. Novak Unit 52 273-5345 7814 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 78. Mark A. and V. Faye Gibson Unit 77 273-5346 7841 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 5 of 8 . ~;-,~~ iii! I . . . . 79. James P. and Mary J. Stevens Unit 78 273-5347 7849 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 80. Patrick M. Milligan Unit 79 273-5348 7857 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 81- Mary L. Saliaris Unit 80 273-5349 7865 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 82. Carolyn F. Danter Unit 81 273-5350 7809 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 83. David L. Peterson Unit 82 273-5351 7817 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 84. L. E. and Janet V. Swerlein Unit 83 273-5352 7825 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 85. Borror Corporation Unit 84 273-5353 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 86. David V., Sr. and Rita J. Sincebaugh Unit 85 273-5354 7777 Jaymes Street Columbus, Ohio 43017 87. Villiam E. and Dolores K. Leffel Unit 86 273-5355 7785 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 88. Richard S. Galac Unit 87 273-5356 7793 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 89. Dorothy A. Laufersweiler Unit 88 273-5357 7801 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 90. Leonard J. and Anita M. Porter Unit 25 , 273-5005 8000 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 91- Knox and Joan H. Hazelton Unit 26 273-5006 7992 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 92. Bruce T. Eckerle Unit 27 273-5007 7984 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 93. Chrisanne Gordon Unit 28 273-5008 7976 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 94. Aristide M. and Lorraine M. Lavalle Unit 29 273-5009 7968 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 95. Daovd J. Bronowski Unit 30 273-5010 7960 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 6 of 8 ~~,,---~~~~=...... "" "~,..'~<..',~"~<",,.......'- l'I'" . ~ . 96. Elaine S. Ginter Unit 31 273-5011 7952 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 97. Vincent J. Gatto Unit 32 273-5012 7944 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 98. Constance A. Burns Unit 33 273-5013 7936 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 . 99. Judith P. Kirby Unit 34 273-5014 7928 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 100. Nancy A. VanGundy Unit 35 273-5015 7920 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 101. Paul D. and Jennifer J. Jenemann Unit 36 273-5016 7912 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 102. Harry A. and Lois J. Gentry Unit 37 273-5017 7923 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 103. Luis G. G. and Ana L. V. DeGonzales Unit 38 273-5018 7937 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 104. Paul C. Kruse Unit 39 273-5019 7961 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 105. Blaine T. and Yvonne S. Sickles Unit 40 273-5020 7997 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 106. Harold C. and Shirley M. Roulette, Trustees Unit 41 273-5021 7930 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 107. Judith A. Mastrine Unit 42 273-5022 7920 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 108. Carol A. Huddleston Unit 43 273-5023 7910 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 109. Charles R. and Nancy S. Wagner Unit 44 273-5024 7900 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 . 110. Borror Corporation Unit 53 273-5570 5501 Frantz Road ,tfl'#t'.., Dublin, Ohio 43017 111. Timothy C. Bibler Unit 54 273-5571 7798 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 112. Borror Corporation Unit 55 273-5572 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 7 of 8 ""~ -----~,,.. " ~ . 113. Betty C. Fell Unit 56 273-5573 7782 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 114. Borror Corporation Unit 57 273-5574 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 115. Martha H. Fivecoat Unit 58 273-5575 7766 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 116. Borror Corporation Unit 59 273-5576 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 117. Michael M. McRae Unit 60 273-5577 7750 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 , , '*;.,~> page 8 of 8 ~' ,~ . , , CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No: DISTRICT MAP 11-: 1-'~/-~ (Reclassification of Land) Date Filed: ~-11 Fee Receipt No C;O Received by: b. M ~'t'~ Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary TO TilE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant Edwards Land Company (Have property in contract) purchaser being the ~x~~~~~~~* of property located within the area proposed for development of a single family subdivision , requests that the following described land to be placed in the Planned Low Density Residential District, Dublin Code 1181.02 . A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED 1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following): a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of , a recorded plat, with an area of . b. Beginning at a point along (street or other) and being feet in a N SEW direction from the (specify) of (Street or other), and thence having a dimension of from the (spec ify) of (street or other), and having an area of . Known as the Cook property. c. The tract of land containing 85 Acres and bounded by: Brand Road & Brnadon (specify) on the N S K ~ (Circle) Ashbaugh Road (specify) on the N~ K W (Circle) Treetops, Woods of Dublin and River For~st (specify) on the l'l ![ E 1il (Circle) Muirfield Tournament Parking (specify) on the N ~E 1il (Circle) * d. Attached legal description: YES X NO ,,, new 1 egal description to be prepared froo a::i:ual survey ,.; AUG - 5 1991 Page 1 of 3 - ~' , , Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of not less than 8~ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500) feet beyond the limits of the proposed change. To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be fully dimensioned. The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District boundaries. List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list. NAME ADDRESS - See attached list " B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: Single Familyfubdivision . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2) copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved. For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful to the review of this application. Plans and Exhibits submitted Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan Text ; Sketch ; - - - Photographs ; Other Site Plan (specify) - 2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing -~ and probably future land use character of the vicinity. See attached text ~.. Page 2 of 3 pages " ~_"" ~"~___'_'__~~__~~~"~-.~_~~~.'''''''___~.~~_'-" ""_'-""',' f'" Ii" .._',":iJiiti:f' tifllt ~:: ,I . 3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES NO x If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration C. AFFIDAVIT Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property: APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, 1 (we) Christopher T. Cline, attorney for Edwards Land Company being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached, and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and that the statements and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Q~tu~ Christopher T. Cline Attorney at Law 37 West Bridge street Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Mailing address) 614-766-0425 (Phone) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th day of August , x~~.l g91 . ./? j . ./ (./ -' ," . / 0 if , ,/ .~ THOMAS G. CLINE / /.~. '. /",' NOTARY PUBlIC. STATE OF OHIO ~J>-7 ~,/ , ?t ~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 30, 1992 V (notary Public) A._ Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory: ,~~ (Name (Address) (Telephone) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not wrIte below thIs-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - D. RECORD OF ACTION 1. Withdrawn Held to (Date) (Date) 2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modified 3. City Council: Date of Hearing Aooroved Disapproved Modified _,.-'"',.-"----'.;"""'"'~"_~_-~_~~~"'.:.,~'"~,~, "'".'_ .",'"".,x~,."''"~~_,b,,'__-:,,''''~__,--'''_'"''"'''''_#:,..':',' "''ii--- "iUl"fi'~" 'Y~fi~l':r'_'~'Ul*,-Oiil!'-liIii.ijm:"I,',,_~;~"'i"'<'_' .- .--",:",'.__,..."_"" (,~'",";".",~:d,';;j~~".~ Date: &-/ f/--1/ The undersigned are the owners of the 85.236 acre tract of land located in the City of Dublin and lying north and east of the intersection of Brand and Ashbaugh Roads. Consent is given to the submission of a rezoning application for the Planned Low Density Residential zoning category (Dublin Code section 1181.02) by the Edwards Land Compa.'1Y, which is in contract to purchase the land. ~ ~/>- ;'c _ ./ _~' C/?' /.,::" . ~/~~~~ook / ::J~~-- The Estate of Donald S. Cook by /; # ,au; , 6 /99/ ._~~"""""~~'''.,''m c,,^",.,~ ~ J , ~--Iii )!"~ 11 , The applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (itS) Planned Lo D 't R od t' 1 request for w enSl y eSl en bY. the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ~nd/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or hi mling commi tment thnt the C,i ty of Duhlin \-Ii 1.1 he nhle to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities wIlen needed hy said applicant. The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available as needed. However, the rapid growth of the Ci ty of DubJ in nnd NorLln.;est Franklin County has stretched the City's cnpncily La provide t.hese servi.ces to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to tIle applicant until some future date. The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing. 8/5/91 .. .. Date Sigr c -ure of Applicant or authorized representative thereof. On behalf of: Edwards Land Company Applicant ,_,"./f,.~ -"-~-,~~,~ Bristol Commons Development Plan Text Edwards Land Company 85 Acres N. of Brand and E. of Ashbaugh PLDR Dublin Code 1181.02 August 5, 1991 A. Proposed location and size of residential units Attached to this text is a site layout which constitutes the graphic portion of the development plan. The site layout shows the location of roads, parks and the configuration, to scale, of the actual residential lots. Each lot is to be used for one single family home and there are 208 lots in total. The smallest lots contain 80 foot fronts and about 10,000 square feet of area. The site constitutes only one residential area. The PLDR density calculation is 3.5 and the more familiar gross site density is 2.4 units per acre. Homes in the development will be of a variety of types and will be constructed by applicant's company as well as other builders acceptable to applicant. Size and price range will be dictated by the market, adjoining development and buyer's preferences. B. Proposed size, location and use of non residential portions of the site The only non residential portion of the site is the park area designated at the Brand Road entrance to the development. This area will be dedicated to the City of Dublin in fulfillment of the open space requirements of the code. The park area will expand on existing scenic open space that has been preserved along Brand Road and the north fork of Indian Run Creek. This will continue the effort to retain the bucolic and rural views historically presented along Brand Road. As shown on the attached site plan, applicant proposes to dedicate a total of 9.5 acres of park. This is less than the 13.1 acres required by Dublin Code open space requirements. It is applicant's desire to contribute the balance of the required dedication in the form of cash to develop the park area. Applicant proposes to provide a park that will be unique in the City of Dublin, providing a horticultural focal point on the scenic Brand Road corridor, An English formal garden is envisioned featuring carefully planned flower beds integrated with hedges and flowering trees. The entire garden will be watered by a sprinkler system fed by a well. Seventy-five percent of the maintenance will be furnished by an endowment fund provided by applicant and yearly assessments on homeowners in the subdivision. The City has expressed a desire to use the barn presently on the section planned for the park as a parks maintenance and storage structure. Applicant is agreeable to this use of the barn providing the City either provides funds for the structure's refurbishment or allows applicant to apply funds destined to the City park department from other projects to be used for the task. Integral with the development of the park area will be the provision of a pond area on the north side of Indian Run. In addition to presenting a pleasing view the pond will provide storm water retention for the development. ~m '" ~ -~",..'-~~ .~."",;... Ii C. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage. Sanitary sewer is accessible at three locations. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives--streets that presently stub into the sire. A 15 inch line is available in a section of Brandon presently being developed at the southwest portion of the site. Water lines are accessible at three locations also. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives and a 16 inch line runs along the south side of Brand Road Engineering considerations will determine which of the sewer and water access points are used and which areas of the site will be selViced by each. Surface drainage will conform to code requirements and will utilize a wet pond in the park area. Surface runoff during construction will be managed to prevent or minimize to the degree possible silt and debris entering the creek. D. Proposed traffic circulation patterns The main entrance to the development will be directly off Brand Road. It is anticipated that the bulk of automobile traffic generated by the development will utilize this access to the city's thoroughfare system. From Brand Road. traffic can conveniently utilize either Dublin Bellepoint Road, Coffman Road or Memorial Drive to reach shopping, business destinations or major artery and freeway access. Additionally, connections to existing roads in adjoining Brandon (to the south) and to The Woods of Dublin(on the east) will be provided. These connections provide secondary access and also facilitate access for fire and emergency selVices. Interior roads are designed to meet code requirements for developments of this nature. Any sidewalk requirements of the code will be applicable. The provision of bikeways is an open item. Applicant is working with the parks department to determine if there is a need in this area for bikeway facilities. E. Proposed schedule of site development The development of the site will be phased and will begin at the entrance area at the southwest corner. Each phase will be planned and developed as dictated by market and demand conditions. The park area will be developed and dedicated as part of the first phase. Initiation of development is planned for the spring of 1992, with models in place by the fall of 1992. Thereafter, construction of homes will occur as scheduled by individual builders. There are no common architectural themes or materials. It is anticipated that materials and quality will be equal or superior to development in the adjoining Brandon subdivision. The primary existing topographical feature of the site is the creek area in the southwest corner. As stated, this will be preselVed and enhanced as part of the park development The balance of the site is unremarkable in terms of topographical features, containing only a mild slope. Treelines along the exterior of the site will be preselVed. It also applicant's intention to preselVe, if possible, the interior treeline running north to south at the western portion of the site. The only structure constructed as part of the site development will be the bridge at the entrance point. This will meet all applicable engineering and other government requirements. Model homes will be constructed and used as sales locations, but these will be typical of residential architecture planned for the area and will ultimately be sold as residences. ~"-_.'--- ~...","",,' --"- _.._"_....._,_,-'~_'AM, ~..<<~_._'" "~_,.c-'-'"..',"..,~,~'..__~"~_'~,,.-=;_,,;_...."" Landscaping in the park area will be the subject of a separate plan developed by applicant with the approval of the parks department. Landscaping of individual homes is regulated by code provisions. F. Relationship of site to existing and planned land use The site area is bounded to the north by parking lots used for an annual golf tournament. To the west, development is underway for a patio homes development. To the south, Brandon constitutes a large single family subdivision. Treetops condominiums border the site to the east as do two single family subdivisions, the Woods of Dublin and River Forest. Generally, this development represents a continuation of the single family development that dominates the area. The site is convenient to thoroughfare access as covered above. Schools (including the high school) are nearby. The municipal swimming pool is within walking distance south of Brand Road and a number of parks are located nearby. A fire station is located on the south side of Brand Road immediately to the west. Shopping is available on Route 161 and will soon be available in the Perimeter Mall on Muirfield Drive. G. Control of site Applicant is in contract to purchase the entire site and as such is fully able to implement the the proposed development. H. Additional points not addressed in text above, and listed as factors under Dublin Code 1181.02 (b)(3) e through r. Building height shall be the same as R -1 of Dublin Code. Side yards shall be a minimum of 15 feet total, with a one side minimum of 7 feet. Front yard setback shall be 25 feet and rear yard setback 25 feet. Interior road right of ways to be 50 feet with twenty six foot pavement, curbed and guttered. Driveway curb cut width maximum to be 30 feet. Off street parking and loading to be to Dublin Code. All homes will have garages. ~~1f~neCL Attorney for Applicant 37 West Bridge Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 614-766-0425 ,"'" "'""'''' Il.....--. " f. ; " . ' 'i t". o' '", " , . .. ~. . " . . . , , . , '0 - .J, ,.._ . -.. ~ .--- ." ..-.. '.'., ......... . '.. . .' ' .- ....01 . ...... ..,. . , "- ~ol37J3 i'f,~E880 ~ROBA TE COURT OF FRANKLIN C:OUNTY,OIiIO '.. ,; ESTATE OF CAROLENE D. TOLLER '. , OECEAseD . Case No. 319954 nocket Page TRANSFERRED ,0 -lb1-B CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER JUN 201979 "I. , ALL of . lJI\s l-(., ROGER W. TRACY, JR. NO. 1 .. ~ Ou'3u,,) AUDITOR Co rtr . FRANKUN COUNTY. OHIO ( The real estate, the transfer of which Is memorialized by thl. certificate, Is described 88 follows [describe . below, using extra .heets If necessary.) The decedents Interest In the entire Interest Is an' undivided Olle--fuilf int~r~8t:, ." ' BEING AN UNDIVIDED ONE-HALF INTEREST ONLY to' the fOlloWing described real' estate, known as the f,am and residence located at 6000. Brand Road, Dublui,'Oh1o: Situated in the County of Franklin, in.the State of Ohio and in the Township of Washington and bounded and described as followS: Being a tract of tanel containing one hundred forty-five and ten' one-hundredths ..- . (145-10/100) acres in Survey Number 2544, and being a'part of262~ acres conveyed by George Dun and wife to Asher Brand and JolmI)uri by deed datedSepd!lllber. 1, 1870. ", - '. ,.:.' :'(:"_ . .' '_:,:': _:'., ;>;.'l',,~, (, ,:': ';' - . Beginning at a stone in the center of the Ashb.1igh Roadi" thtmce N~,:,70 41'E. 95-52/100 poles to a stone; thence S. l9030'E. 22o-40/100poles.to'a st:one;,thenc:eN.' 80030'W. 113-16/100 poles; thence S. 70030'W. 33-40/100 poles to a stone 11itheTurnp1ke; then~e with the center of the Turnpike N.7l~.9-S8/100 poles toa stone at the intersection of the Ashbaugh Road with the Free Turnpike; thence with the Ashbaugh o ", Road N. 4 W. 175 poles to the beginning.' . Containing 145-10/100 acres, more or less. . . ,. . EXCEPTING THE FOLLOWING: Real Estate situated in the CoUnty of Frattklin in the State of Ohio, and in the Township of Washington and bounded and:describedas follows: " ':. ,:' '. .~ I... ' Beginning at a spike in the center line of Ashbaugh ROad attg8 nOrthWesterly corner of said Leonard F. Tuller 145-10/100 acre tract; thence N. 84 51ii5"E. with the . northerly line of said Leonard F. Tuller's 145.10 acre tract a diStance, of is75.61 ' feet to the northeasterly corner of said 145.10 acre tract, one corner also being the 'northwesterly corner of River Forest Addition; thence S. 6045'45"E. with the easterly line of said Leonard F. Tuller's 145.10 acre, tract and the westerly line of said River Forest Addition a distance of l716.4Sf~et;to an'iron"p:lri:. thence N. 80042'15''W. crossing said Leonard F. Tuller's 145.10 ,acre tract; a distance of 1995.20 feet to a spike in the center line ofAShbaugh Road; thence N. S059'45" E. i . . { with the center line of said Ashbaugh Road a distance of 1259.10.feet to the place of beginning and containing 59.864 acres of land, more or less. r' / Containing in all, after, said exception, 85.236. acres, more or.less. , ,-, ......,""."~. -'...~,.._. -'...'=',"-"..,~~__""_'~_>.-~~."~"',~.-;"~'_,,~,,,"''-'-'.'A_..'..,,-~_~,< ,j<< f' Bristol Commons Development Plan Text Edwards Land Company 85 Acres N. of Brand and E. of Ashbaugh ... PLDR Dublin Code 1181.02 August 5, 1991 A. Proposed location and size of residential units A nached to this text is a site layout which constitutes the graphic ponion of the development plan. The site layout shows the location of roads, parks and the configuration. to scale, of the actual residential lots.. Each lot is to be used for one single family home and there are 208 lots in total. The smallest lots contain 80 foot fronts and about 10,000 square feet of area. The site constitutes only one residential area The PLDR density calculation is 3.5 and the more familiar gross site density is 2.4 units per acre. Homes in the development will be of a variety of types and will be constructed by applicant's company as well as other builders acceptable to applicant. Size and price range will be dictated by the market, adjoining development and buyer's preferences. B. Proposed size, location and use of non residential portions of the site The only non residential ponion of the site is the park area designated at the Brand Road enrrance to the development This area will be dedicated to the City of Dublin in fulfillment of the open space requirements of the code. The park area will expand on existing scenic open space that has been preserved along Brand Road and the nonh fork of Indian Run Creek. This will continue the effon to retain the bucolic and rural views historically presented along Brand Road. .'""," As shown on the attached site plan, applicant proposes to dedicate a total of 9.5 acres of park. This is less than the 13.1 acres required by Du blin Code open space requirements. It is applicant's desire to connibute the balance of the required dedication in the fonn of cash to develop the park area Applicant proposes to provide a park that will be unique in the City of Dublin, providing a horticultural focal point on the scenic Brand Road corridor. An English fonnal garden is envisioned featuring carefully planned flower beds integrated with hedges and flowering rrees. The entire garden will be watered by a sprinkler system fed by a well. Seventy-five percent of the maintenance will be furnished by an endowment fund provided by applicant and yearly assessments on homeowners in the subdivision. The City has expressed a desire to use the barn presently on the section planned for the park as a parks maintenance and storage structure. Applicant is agreeable to this use of the barn providing the City either provides funds for the structure's refurbishment or allows applicant to apply funds destined to the City park depanment from other projects to be used for the task. Integral with the development of the park area will be the provision of a pond area on the nonh side of Indian Run. In addition to presenting a pleasing view the pond will provide stonnwater retention for the development n. '.~ ~_~c=-----'-~~_"" =-~"'--""""'-----''-----'"'' ./ ~ C. The proposed prol'ision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage. Sanitary sewer is accessible at three locations. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives--streets that presently stub into the site. A 15 inch line is available in a section of Brandon presently being developed at the southwest ponion of the site. Water lines are accessible at three locations also. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives and a 16 inch line runs along the south side of Brand Road Engineering considerations will determine which of the sewer and water access points are used and which areas of the site will be serviced by each. Surface drainage will confonn to code requirements and will utilize a wet pond in the park area. Surface runoff during construction will be managed to prevent or minimize to the degree possible silt and debris entering the creek. D. Proposed traffic circulation patterns The main entrance to the development will be directly off Brand Road. It is anticipated that the bulk of automobile traffic generated by the development will utilize this access to the city's thoroughfare system. From Brand Road, traffic can conveniently utilize either Dublin Bellepoint Road, Coffman Road or Memorial Drive to reach shopping, business destinations or major artery and freeway access. Additionally, connections to existing roads in adjoining Brandon (to the south) and to The \Voods of Dublin(on the east) will be provided. These connections provide secondary access and also facilitate access for fire and emergency services. Interior roads are designed to meet code requirements for developments of this nature. Any sidewalk requirements of the code will be applicable. The provision of bikeways is an open item. Applicant is working with the parks deparunent to detennine if there is a need in this area for bikeway facilities. E. Proposed schedule of site development The development of the site will be phased and will begin at the entrance area at the southwest corner. Each phase will be planned and developed as dictated by market and demand conditions. The park area will be developed and dedicated as pan of the first phase. Initiation of development is planned for the spring of 1992, with models in place by the fall of 1992. Thereafter, construction of homes will occur as scheduled by individual builders. There are no common architectural themes or materials. It is anticipated that materials and quality will be equal or superior to development in the adjoining Brandon subdivision. The primary existing topographical feature of the site is the creek area in the southwest corner. A'!. stated, this will be preserved and enhanced as pan of the park development The balance of the site is unremarkable in tenns of topographical features, containing only a mild slope. Treelines along the exterior of the site will be preserved.. It also applicant's intention to preserve, if possible, the interior treeline runninsz nOM to south at the western pornon of the site. - The only structure constructed as pan of the site development will be the bridge at the entrance point. This will meet all applicable engineering and other government requirements. Model homes will be constructed and used as sales locations, but these will be typical of residential architecture planned for the area and will ultimately be sold as residences. ~ ~.~ .r trr "'t!t '-',(flil lfijru- tJ ~ l> ... ~ Landscaping in the park area will be the subject of a separate plan developed by applicant with the approval of the parks depanment. Landscaping of individual homes is regulated by code provisions. F. Relationship of site to existing and planned land use The site area is bounded to the north by parking lotS used for an annual golf tournament. To the west, development is underway for a patio homes development. To the south, Brandon constitutes a large single family subdivision. Treetops condominiums border the site to the east as do two single family subdivisions, the Woods ,,", of Dublin and River Forest. Generally, this development represents a continuation of the single family development that dominates the area The site is convenient to thoroul!hfare access as covered above. Schools (inc1udinl! the high school) are nearby. The municipal swimming pool is within walking distance ~ south of Brand Road and a number of parks are located nearby. A fire station is located on the south side of Brand Road immediately to the west. Shopping is available on Route 161 and will soon be available in the Perimeter Mall on Muirfield Drive. G. Control of site Applicant is in contract to purchase the entire site and as such is fully able to implement the the proposed development. H. Additional points not addressed in text abol'e, and listed as factors under Dublin Code 1181.02 (b)(3) e through r. Buildin!! heil!ht shall be the same as R-1 of Dublin Code. Side yards shall be a minimum of 15 feet total, with a one side minimum of 7 feet. Front yard setback shall be 25 feet and rear yard setback 25 feet. Interior road right of ways to be 50 feet with twenty six foot pavement, cmbed and gunered. Driveway curb cut width maximum 10 be 30 feet. Off street parking and loading to be to Dublin Code. All homes will have garages. ~~1f~neCL Anorney for Applicant 37 West Bridge Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 614-766-0425 ~ -~--.'---~"-~'-~ -'ftj I . ; CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF TilE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING DISTRICT MAP (Reclassification of Land) Received by: Please type or print information - Use ndditionnl sheets as necessary TO TilE 1I0NORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant Edwards Land Company (Have property in contract) purchaser being the ~X~~~~~~~* of property located within the area proposed for development of a single family subdivision , requests that the following described land to be placed in the Planned Low Density Residential District, Dublin Code 1181.02 . A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED 1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following): a. Lot(s)!Reserve(s) of , a recorded plat, with an area of . b. Beginning at a point along (street or other) and being feet in a N SEW direction from the (specify) of (Street or other), and thence having a dimension of from the (specify) of (street or .other), and having an area of . Known as the Cook property. c. The tract of land containing 85 Acres and bounded by: / Brand Road & Brnadon (specify) on the N S K ~ (Circ~) Ashbaugh Road (specify) on the N~ K W (Circle) Treeto~s, Woods of Dublin and River or~st (specify) on the N ~ E ~ (Circle) - Muirfield Tournament Parking (specify) on the N ~K ~ (Circle) * ~~ d. Attached legal description: YES X NO ; ,'r new legal description to be prepared :Iron a::tual survey r ~..~n,:'.~....""""'.o, ".. r~''''1~~ ~ r."'4 '"r! (~l rl1 r1 f".,'"1 . . I' I" I, t. n I .', ',iJ :': :: ~ f: ~ 1 II ;}; ...h ~ ~ ' ~ ~, ~,(.~ ,'~ ~ ~ W' AUG - 5 /991 l i Page 1 of 3 ! " L. .. f Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of not less than 8~ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500) feet beyond the limits of the proposed change. To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-or-way, easements and ~ other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be ~ fully dimensioned. The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District boundaries. List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those ---- appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list. /" NAME ADDRESS - See attached list " ,~ B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND ""-'" 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: Single Family~bdivision . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2) copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved. For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful to the review of this application. Plans and Exhibits submitted Plot Plan ; Building Plan _____; Development PlanText ; Sketch ; ----- Photographs _____ ; Other Site Plan (specify) ; 2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and probably future land use character of the vicinity. ~ See attached text "'-'" Page 2 of 3 pages ,.'~--= . t 3. lias an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES NO x If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration ,---- ..........' C. AFFIDAVIT Bcfore completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property: APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OUIO COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, " I ( we) Christopher T. Cline, attorney for Edwards Land Company bcing duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached, ,,- and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and that the statements and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Qk4r6tuCA Christopher T. Cline Attorney at Law 37 West Bridge street Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Mailing address) 614-766-0425 (Phone) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5th August , x~~1 g91. THOMAS G. CLINE NOTARY PUBUC, STATE OF OHIO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 30. 1992 ."," Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory: ~t,<# (Name (Address) (Telephone) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not ;rIte be To; thIs-IIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - D. RECORD OF ACTION 1. Withdrawn Held to (Date) (Date) 2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modified 3. City Council: Date of lIearing Approved Disapproved Modified I II f ! February 7, 1992 I DESCRIPTION OF 86.775 ACRES NORTH OF BRAND ROAD, EAST OF ASHBAUGH ROAD CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO I situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of DUblin, being a part of Virginia Military Survey No. 2544, being all of that land as described in a deed to Elizabeth Ellen Cook, of record in Official Records Volume 6717, Page A17, all references being to the records in the Recorder's Office, I Franklin County, Ohio, and being more particularly described as 1 follows: I Beginning at a railroad spike found at the centerline > intersection of Brand Road, 60.00 feet in width, and Ashbaugh ~ Road, 60.00 feet in width, said spike also being the southeasterly corner of that 6.313 acre tract of land as Idescribed in a deed to Richard A. Coulter, of record in Deed Book 2365, Page 694; Thence North 10 43' 11" West, along the centerline of Ashbaugh Road, passing a railroad spike at the northeasterly ,~ I corner of said 6.313 acre tract at 527.48 feet, a total distance I of 1642.31 feet to a railroad spike found at the southwesterly / I corner of that 59.864 acre tract of land as described in a deed I to Muirfield Village Golf Club, of record in Official Records I Volume 10776, Page H16; Thence North 880 33' 10" East, along the southerly line of said 59.864 acre tract, a distance of 1994.84 feet to an iron pin found at the southeasterly corner of same and in the westerly line of Lot 33 of River Forest, a subdivision of record in Plat Book 28, Page 46; I Thence South 170 31' 52" East, along said westerly line, a distance of 206.79 feet to an iron pin found at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 33; ~ ,I Thence South 170 53' 01" East, along the westerly lines of I Lots 34 and 35, along the westerly line of The Woods of Dublin, _ I Section 3, a sUbdivision of record in Plat Book 66, Page 80 and along the westerly line of Treetops at Brandon Condominium, of record in Condominium Plat Book 43, Page 26, a distance of 1722.58 feet to an iron pin set at the northeasterly corner of Brandon Section 2, Phase 1, a subdivision of record in Plat Book 66, Page 33; ,! Thence North 820 38' 22" West, along the northerly line of ,I said Brandon Section 2, Phase 1 and along the northerly line of "Brandon Section 2, Phase 2, a distance of 1873.83 feet to an iron pin found in the northerly line of that 3.392 acre tract of land las described in a deed to Ronald L. Geese, of record in Official Records Volume 2012, Page B03; I Thence South 730 45' 23" West, along said northerly line, a distance of 548.74 feet to a railroad spike found at the most I westerly corner of said 3.392 acre tract and in the centerline of I Brand Road; Thence North 680 58' 25" West, along said centerline, a I distance of 161.73 feet to the place of beginning and containing 86.775 acres of land. ~. , - I Bearings herein are based on the referenced plats of Brandon . SUbdivision. _ Iron pin set consists of a 1" (O.D.) iron pipe, 3011 long with a plastic cap inscribed "M-E ENGII. I This description was prepared by M-E Engineering, Inc., Civil Division, based on information obtained from an actual field survey of the premises in December, 1991. \\\\..'....'~'F"""J" ill /~t ~ ... '\ ........ 0 '" o ~ @'DWlmm_.--- ".~.....il.(jLl~H/...t-< '~ A.. ~ . CJ : FEB - 7 /992 U~ ~JVim } '< ~ ;. '. ('U' 72 <v<;;.: := l r ~ 0' ". C' I or ~ ~ .." "<: ; CITY Or!!}HD"hM/9~)306986. 775/7i "'" u'f,';""~""""(J ~.,: 'eJD c:nJf "" I V E '( ", I I, _.' 'I, \\' , 'IJ... . ...., 'l"l1 ~ , -,~. ~"""'~'-"= . ~ ~ ~ m~~,,,~,,.-,~ Date: &-/7- '1/ The undersigned are the owners of the 85.236 acre tract of land located in the City of Dublin and lying north and east of the intersection of Brand and Ashbaugh Roads. Consent is given to the submission of a rezoning application for the Planned Low Density Residential zoning category (Dublin Code section 1181.02) by the Edwards Land Company, which is i!1 r:omr::lct !O p!.!rch~se the bnd. '- . " . -// (/1.' <? ...... - .' (.L. ~,.... "-LA.... L- ~" . o-n--'/' -,.. Elii beth T. Cook X-:::',) The Estate of Donald S. Cook by/' t . !, 'J ;! ;. fi \ : . '1' . AUG , 6 /99/ >" ,. .~, ! ,"_C.'",-".-,',"".-N ,"---~---.., " - J TIle applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its) reqllest for Planned Low D 't R 'd t" 1 ensl. y esl. en :t,y. the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission fund/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment thnt the City of Dllbli.n Hill he Ahle to provide essential services such 8S water nnd sewer facilities when needed hy said applicant. The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available as needed. However, the rapid grolvth of the Ci ty of DubJ in nne! Northwest Franklin County has stretched the City's cn(lncjLy Lo provide these servi.ces to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date. 1~e undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing. 8/5/91 -. -. Date Sigl1c lire of Applicant or authorized representative thereof. On behalf of: Edwards Land Company Applicant ~ . \ --~,,_."'" ".. c_,,__...~_"',____.._._,_w_+-~_.",__.__.._.__ ~Xh'lb;+ 6 Subject property in the names of Elizabeth E. and Donald S. Cook Tax Map 0-107-B, Tax Parcel No. 273-583, 85.236 acres Adjacent Landowners: 1. Richard L. Coulter, 12/7/61, 6.313 acres, 273-423 6100 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 2. Ronald L. Geese and Anne Farmer Geese, 7/31/89, 3.392 acres, 273-581 5964 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 -'\ 3. Planned Communities Development Co. acquired 11/20-85, 19.3623 acres 273-581 150 Vest Yilson Bridge Road ..." Yorthington, Ohio 43085 4. Lee A. and Karla Vermeer, 9/7/88 273-371 6001 Brand Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 5. Village of Dublin, Ohio, 10/27/87, 26.789 acres 273-4183 6665 Coffman Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 6. Jack and Ruth E. Strader, 4/28/89, 1 acre 273-1440 2550 Brixton Road . Columbus, Ohio 43221 7. Muirfield Village Golf Club, 11/16/87, 38.007 acres, 273-593 P. O. Box 565 Dublin, Ohio 43017 MAP N88CC 8. Patrick A. & Kay E. McNally, 4/2/91, Lot 126 273-3773 7741 Crawley Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 9. Yilliam E. and Darlene R. Leshnock, 7/8/88, Lot 127 273-3774 7750 Crawley Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 tIf/I/fIIi RIVER FOREST SUBDIVISION, MAP N88 10. Gregory A. and B. Roberts, 11/9/83, Lot 31 2'73-481 ~ 5557 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 11. Mark G. and C. H. Tuttle, 5/2/84, Lot 32 273-482 5549 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 12. George J. Gianakopoulos, 5/2/90, Lot 33 273-483 5541 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 13. Yilliam M. and Sarah C. Knauf, 8/28/87, Lot 34 273-484 5533 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 14. Edward J. and S. J. Russell, 7/i~/90, Lot 35 273-485 5525 Ashford Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 \ page 1 of 8 ~' "-' -' ~~--"---~,~--~.~,~"",~~<"",""",,-,,~-~'-=~" ..,."< 1 . 15. Michael D. and Donna D. Killian, 8/4/83, Lot 36 273-486 5517 Ashford Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 THE YOODS OF DUBLIN SECTION 3, MAP N88CCC 16. Joe Y. and Sue Harden, 3/7/90, Lot 56 273-3980 5799 Rushwood Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 17. Jodell M. Everhart, 3/2/89, Lot 57 273-3981 5806 Rushwood Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 BRANDON SECTION 2, PHASE 1, MAP N88GGGG 18. James D. and Erin K. Bishop, 10/20/89, Lot 131 273-3778 5458 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 19. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 132 273-3779 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 20. James E. and Barbara S. Jones, 12/31/90, Lot 133 273-3780 5442 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 21. Charles D. and P. A. Dudgeon, 3/29/88, Lot 134 273-3781 5434 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 22. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 135 273-3782 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 23. Steven L. and Susan M. Yhite, 8/16/89, Lot 136 273-3783 5418 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 . 24. Philip R. and Susan J. Zuroweste, 5/17/88, Lot 137 273-3784 5410 Haverhill Drive A~,. Dublin, Ohio 43017 25. John S. and Cheryl S. Banner, 3/23/90, Lot 138 273-3785 5402 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 26. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 139 273-3786 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 27. M/I Schottenstein HOmes, Inc. acquired 6/27/88, Lot 140 273-3787 P. O. Box 29188 Columbus, Ohio 43229-0000 28. Morris R. and Barbara Hyde Berrong, 3/12/90, Lot 141 273-3788 5378 Haverhill Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 29. t - John R. and Annette N. Poeppelman, 4/3/90, Lot 142 273-3789 5370 Brandonway Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 2 of 8 ",-,....^...~-"""'" MAP N88HH 30. Muirfield Greene Co., 17.603 acres, 273-3211 c/o Bob Vebb Builders 7662 North Central Drive Vesterville, Ohio 43081 TREETOPS AT BRANDON CONDOMINIUMS, MAP T-56 . 3l. Ronald G. and Mary L. Ferrell Unit 1 273-4245 7779 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 32. Elwood A. and Edith S. Chinsley Uni t 2 273-4246 ~ 7771 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 33. Ned B. and Geraldine A. Vheeler and Mildred R. Paloncy ...."", 7763 Bartles Avenue Unit 3 273-4247 Dublin, Ohio 43017 34. Dale Campion Unit 4 273-4248 7755 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 35. John G. and Marilyn L. Allen Unit 5 273-4249 7787 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 36. Villiam A. and Jean McCabe Loughman Unit 6 273-4250 7795 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 37. John E. Geuss Unit 7 273-4251 7803 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 38. Gloria C. Tuttle Unit 8 273-4252 7811 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 39. George R. and Barbara J. Mallory Unit 9 273-4253 7819 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 IIfI'i> 40. Donald C. and Yoetle M. Hopkin Uni t 10 273-4254 7827 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 ~''''''i, 4l. Hugh T. and JoAnn Miller Unit 11 273-4255 7835 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 42. Paul H. and M. A. Hellinger Uni t 12 273-4256 7851 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 43. Villiam F., Jr. and Patricia S. Ashburn Unit 13 273-4257 7955 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 44. Richard M. and Bernadette A. Cusak Unit 14 273-4258 7963 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 ~ . 45. James A. and Christina K. Rieser Unit 15 273-4259 7971 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 3 of 8 ... . . , 46. Marcia B. Daneman Unit 16 273-4260 7979 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 47. Leslie R. and Marge A. Hinzmann Unit 17 273-4261 7987 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 48. John S. and Mary D. Vyatt Unit 18 273-4262 7995 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 49. Peggy A. Miller Unit 19 273-4263 7998 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 50. Robert J. and K. L. Pudelski Unit 20 273-4264 7990 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 5l. Margaret J. Vallace Unit 21 273-4265 7982 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 52. Catherine Berry Unit 22 273-4266 7974 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 53. Barbara J. Agne Unit 23 273-4267 7966 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 54. George H. and Janet M. Fullerton Unit 24 273-4268 7958 Lewis Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 55. Toni L. Cialella Unit 61 273-4269 7784 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 56. Joseph, Jr. and Anthony J., Sr. Aulino Unit 62 273-4270 7776 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 57. Borror Corporation Unit 63 273-4271 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 58. Kenneth R. and Kathryn V. Good Unit 64 273-4272 7760 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 59. Kathleen Gilliland Unit 65 273-4273 7816 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 60. Blase P. and Maureen Deleo Unit 66 273-4274 7808 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 6l. LeeAnn V. Harding Unit 67 273-4275 7800 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 62. Michael E. and Ellen E. DOuglass\ Unit'68 273-4276 7792 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 \ page 4 of 8 --~'- 63. Thomas P. Brundige Unit 69 273-4277 7848 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 64. John A. and Sally J. Ubbing Unit 70 273-4278 7840 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 65. Eric L. and Margaret E. Lyon Unit 71 273-4279 7832 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 66. Anthony A. Fata Unit 72 273-4280 7824 Bartles Avenue ~ Dublin, Ohio 43017 67. Ned B. and Geraldine A. Yheeler Unit 73 273-4281 ...", 7880 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 68. Patricia A. Yiese Unit 74 273-4282 7872 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 69. James T. and Martha R. Holden Unit 75 273-4283 7864 Bartles Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 70. Borror Corporation Unit 76 273-4284 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 7l. Nancy S. Diesem Unit 45 . 273-5338 7870 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 72. Harold L. Smith Unit 46 273-5339 7862 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 73. Robert C. and Mary B. Byers Unit 47 273-5340 7854 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 73. Kazuo and Yuko Hisaki Unit 48 273-5341 ,iIfIiIi!ti 7846 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 74. Coleman J. and Marjorie S. Major, Trustees '~' Unit 49 273-5342 7838 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 75. Henry A. and Mary D. Baker Unit 50 273-5343 7830 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 76. M. Vivian McKenzie Unit 51 273-5344 7822 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 77. Donald A. Novak Unit 52 273-5345 7814 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 ~ 78. Mark A. and V. Faye Gibson Uni t 77 273-5346 7841 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 5 of 8 ~ ',",'. ..,,",_...,- , 79. James P. and Mary J. Stevens Unit 78 273-5347 7849 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 80. Patrick M. Milligan Unit 79 273-5348 7857 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 81. Mary L. Saliaris Unit 80 273-5349 7865 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 82. Carolyn F. Danter Unit 81 273-5350 7809 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 83. David L. Peterson Unit 82 273-5351 7817 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 84. L. E. and Janet V. Swerlein Unit 83 273-5352 7825 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 85. Borror Corporation Unit 84 273-5353 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 86. David V., Sr. and Rita J. Sincebaugh Unit 85 273-5354 7777 Jaymes Street Columbus, Ohio 43017' 87. Villiam E. and Dolores K. Leffel Unit 86 273-5355 7785 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 88. Richard S. Galac Unit 87 273-5356 7793 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 89. Dorothy A. Laufersweiler Unit 88 273-5357 7801 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 90. Leonard J. and Anita M. Porter Unit 25 . 273-5005 8000 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 91. Knox and Joan H. Hazelton Unit 26 273-5006 7992 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 92. Bruce T. Eckerle Unit 27 273-5007 7984 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 93. Chrisanne Gordon Unit 28 273-5008 7976 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 94. Aristide M. and Lorraine M. Lavalle Unit 29 273-5009 7968 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 95. Daovd J. Bronowski ubi t 30- 273-5010 7960 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 6 of 8 -~--,~"-,"---_....~--~"--,._---,~,~--,"","- , 96. Elaine S. Ginter Unit 31 273-5011 7952 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 97. Vincent J. Gatto Unit 32 273-5012 7944 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 98. Constance A. Burns Unit 33 273-5013 7936 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 , 99. Judith P. Kirby Unit 34 273-5014 7928 Jaymes Street ~ Dublin, Ohio 43017 100. Nancy A. VanGundy Unit 35 273-5015 jj 7920 Jaymes Street ....I Dublin, Ohio 43017 10l. Paul D. and Jennifer J. Jenemann Unit 36 273-5016 7912 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 102. Harry A. and Lois J. Gentry Unit 37 273-5017 7923 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 103. Luis G. G. and Ana L. V. DeGonzales Unit 38 273-5018 7937 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 104. Paul C. Kruse Unit 39 273-5019 7961 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 105. Blaine T. and Yvonne S. Sickles Unit 40 273-5020 7997 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 106. Harold C. and Shirley M. Roulette, Trustees Unit 41 273-5021 7930 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 - 107. Judith A. Mastrine Unit 42 273-5022 7920 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 _i! 108. Carol A. Huddleston Unit 43 273-5023 7910 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 109. Charles R. and Nancy S. Vagner Unit 44 273-5024 7900 Clark Avenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 110. Borror Corporation Unit 53 273-5570 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 11l. Timothy C. Bibler Uni t 54 273-5571 7798 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 ~ , 112. Borror Corporation Uni t 55 273-5572 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 page 7 of 8 """ .'-~--~<"~~ I ~ 113. Betty C. Fell Unit 56 273-5573 7782 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 114. Borror Corporation Unit 57 273-5574 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 115. Martha H. Fivecoat Unit 58 273-5575 7766 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 116. Borror Corporation Unit 59 273-5576 5501 Frantz Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 117. Michael M. McRae Unit 60 273-5577 7750 Jaymes Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 ,. ~ . ,. page 8 of 8 oom mDw~-F ~ : !: . ; f' '( r') , I U i ' JAN 1 :- i.:'::~c ; U -,.._-~ CITY O( uUBLlN Bristol Commons Development Plan Text ~ Edwards Land Company I 85 Acres N. of Brand and E. of Ashbaugh ..., PLDR Dublin Code 1181.02 August 5, 1991 revised October 28, 1991 revised December 10, 1991 A. Proposed location and size of residential units Attached to this text is a site layout which constitutes the graphic portion of the development plan. The site layout shows the location of roads, parks and the configuration, to scale, of the actual residential lots. Each lot is to be used for one single family home and there are 180 lots in total. The smallest lots contain 80 foot fronts and about 10,000 square feet of area. Only a minority of the lots fall in this category. Most of the lots fall in the 90 and 100 front foot category (at the building line). All of the lots that border both the River Forest and the Woods of Dublin subdivisions have 100 foot frontage and additionally meet R-2 standards. The site constitutes only one residential area. The PLDR density calculation is 2.64 and the more familiar gross site density is 2.1 units per acre. Homes in the development will be of a variety of types and will be constructed by applicant's company as well as other builders acceptable to applicant. Size and price range ~,~ will be dictated by the market, adjoining development and buyer's preferences. Deed restrictions incorporating architectural review requirements have been prepared and have been provided along with this application. Applicant will file these as part of the '''Witf- development process. B. Proposed size, location and use of non residential portions of the site The only non residential portion of the site is the park area designated at the Brand Road entrance to the development. This area will be dedicated to the City .of Dublin in fulfillment of the open space requirements of the code. The park area will expand on existing scenic open space that has been preseIVed along Brand Road and the north fork of Indian Run. This will continue the effort to retain the bucolic and rural views historically presented along Brand Road. The City has expressed a desire to use the barn presently on the section planned for the park as a parks maintenance and storage~.structure. Applicant is agreeable to this use of the barn providing the City provides funds for the structure's refurbishment and mainten- ance. A plan to develop the park, in exchange for the city accepting a slightly smaller parkland dedication, was discussed in the first version of this text. That approach is no Bristol Commons Development Plan Page I printed 1/16/92; version of December 10, 1992 as passed by P&Z January 9.1992 - . _._'.....__~_.~h~~'. ---~ 1 ---.-.- longer being pursued. Instead, applicant wili dedicate the entire parkland amount as required by Dublin code. This change does not amount to a renunciation of applicant's intention to develop the park area; it still intends to do so. However, the applicant is no longer requesting concessions from the city with regard to parkland amount and as a result will be able to simply work directly with the city outside of the zoning process on a mutual agreement basis. There are several reasons for this change. As the number of lots requested by applicant was reduced through the negotiating process, the financial resources ultimately available to applicant were diminished. Also, staff was increasingly concerned, from a design standpoint, with the scope of development in the park. Finally, staff entered very strong objections to alteration of the floodplain in the park area. Thus, several factors seem to constrain execution of the original concept of the park. However, it is applicant's belief that as more detailed floodplain data becomes available and as engineering work on the subdivision becomes complete that the appropriate direction for development of the park area will become more clear. Applicant expects to incorporate this hard data with design concepts and produce a development plan for the park that will reconcile the competing criteria. It is the present expectation that this development will convey a bucolic setting preseIVing the existing natural theme with enhancement by appropriate flowers and other plantings. Since the flood way study as well as detailed engineering on the bridge will not be complete for some time, it is actually beneficial to decouple the park development details from the zoning process with its short term time requirements. Applicant will commit to the incorporation of at least $150,000 of improvements to the park area, exclusive of the expenditure for the roadway and the bridge. Further, applicant will commit to maintenance of the park area for a period of five years from the date on site development of the subdivision actually begins. C. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage. Sanitary sewer is accessible at three locations. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives--streets that presently stub into the site. A 15 inch line is available in a section of Brandon presently being developed at the southwest portion of the site. Water lines are accessible at three locations also. 8 inch lines are present at Crawley and Rushwood Drives and a 16 inch line runs along the south side of Brand Road Engineering considerations will detennine which of the sewer and water access points are used and which areas of the site will be seIViced by each. SUlface drainage will conform to code requirements and will utilize wet or dry ponds in the park area. The pond areas will be subject to the approval of the park director. Surface runoff during construction will be managed to prevent, or minimize to the degree possible, silt and debris entering the creek. There will be no surface drainage onto any of the adjoining lots in the River Forest subdivision. , There presently exists a flooding problem along the North Fork of Indian Run, which passes through the southwest portion of the site. Although this problem predates this development, the applicant has agreed to participate in a FEMA/floodway study of the area along Brand Road, including land to both the east and west of applicant's site. The bridge applicant will need to construct will ~lso be, designed to comply with this study. . ' D. Proposed traffic circulation patterns The main entrance to the development will be directly off Brand Road. It is anticipated that the bulk of automobile traffic generated by the development will utilize this Bristol Commons Development Plan Page 2 printed 1/16192: version of December 10. 1992 as passed by P&Z January 9.1992 access to the city's thoroughfare system. From Brand Road, traffic can conveniently utilize either Dublin Bellepoint Road, Coffman Road or Muirfield Drive to reach shopping, business destinations or major artery and freeway access. Additionally, connections to existing roads in adjoining Brandon (to the south) and to The Woods of Dublin(on the east) will be provided. These connections provide secondary access and also facilitate access for fIre and emergency services, both to this development and to those adjoining subdivisions. Interior roads are designed to meet code requirements for developments of this nature. Rights of way will be dedicated as 50 feet in width with 26 foot pavement, curbed and guttered, except for the entry road which will be 60 foot width right of way, 32 foot ~ pavement, up to the point of the last intersection before the present terminus of Crawley Drive. This is shown on the attached site plan. .....",. Any sidewalk requirements of the code will be applicable. The provision of bikeways is an open item. Applicant is working with the parks department to detennine if there is a need in this area for bikeway facilities. Applicant will cooperate with the city as to the future of Ashbaugh Road, whether it remains a public right of way or as a private easement for golf tournament traffIc. E. Proposed schedule of site development The development of the site will be phased and will begin at the entrance area at the southwest comer. Each phase will be planned and developed as dictated by ,market and demand conditions. The park area will be dedicated as part of the first phase. Initiation of development is planned for the spring of 1992, with models in place by the fall of 1992. Thereafter, construction of homes will occur as scheduled by individual builders. There are no common architectural themes or materials. It is anticipated that materials and quality will be equal or superior to development in the adjoining Brandon subdivision. The primary existing topographical feature of the site is the creek area in the southwest comer. This will be preserved as part of the park. The balance of the site is unremarkable in terms of topographical features, containing only a mild slope. Treelines along the exterior of the site will be preserved. It also applicant's intention to preserve, if possible, the interior treeline running north to south at the western ",.. portion of the site. The only structure constructed as part of the site development will be the bridge at the entrance point. This will meet all applicable engineering and other government ~;, requirements. Model homes will be constructed and used as sales locations, but these will be typical of residential architecture planned for the area and will ultimately be sold as residences. Landscaping by applicant in the park area will be the subject of a separate plan developed by applicant with the approval of the parks department Landscaping of individual homes is regulated by code provisions. As part of an agreement with adjoining residents, applicant has agreed to plant evergreen trees along the northeast boundary with the three lots in the River Forest subdivision. F. Relationship of site to existing and planned land use \ - "', The site area is bounded to the north by parking lots used for an annual golf tournament. To the west, development is underway for a patio homes development. To the south, Brandon constitutes a large single family subdivision. Treetops condominiums border the site to the east as do two single family subdivisions, the Woods of Dublin and River Forest. Generally, this development represents a continuation of the Bristol Commons Development Plan Page 3 printed 1/16192: version of December 10. 1992 as passed by P&Z January 9.1992 .4/&" '"~~M_~"~ single family development that dominates the area The site is convenient to thoroughfare access as covered above. Schools (including the high school) are nearby. The municipal swimming pool is within walking distance south of Brand Road and a number of parks are located nearby. A fire station is located on the south side of Brand Road immediately to the west. Shopping is available on Route 161 and will soon be available in the Perimeter Mall on Muirfield Drive. G. Control of site Applicant is in contract to purchase the entire site and as such is fully able to . - implement the the proposed development H. Additional points not addressed in text above, and listed as factors under Dublin Code 1181.02 (b)(3) e through r. Building height shall be a maximum of 35 feet, measured per Dublin cod,e. Side yards shall be a minimum of 15 feet total, with a one side ' minimum of 7 feet. Front yard setback shall be 25 feet. Rear yard setback 25 feet, except for lots adjoining River Forest and the Woods of Dublin subdivisions where the rear yard setback will be 50 feet. Interior road right of ways to be 50 feet with twenty six foot pavement, curbed and guttered, except entry roadway as shown on site plan, which is 60 feet with 32 foot pavement. Off street parking and loading to be to Dublin Code. All homes will have garages. Applicant will provide signage at the entrance to the Woods of Dublin at the point where Rushwood drive enters the site. This signage will indicate the transition from Bristol Commons to the Woods of Dublin. There is a substantial grade change which takes place on the western edge of the Woods of Dublin. Applicant will be sympathetic to this factor in its engineering, and will preserve IC:~~~~~ Attorney for Applicant 37 West Bridge Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 614-766-0425 \ Bristol Commons Development Plan Page 4 printed 1/16192; version of December 10. 1992 as passed by P&Z January 9,1992 "';l:ii~ CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE ATTORNEY AT LAW 37 WEST BRIDGE STREET DUBLIN, OHIO 4301 7 January 8. 1992 614/766-0425 fIrst revision FAX 614/766,5797 Mr. Vince Lodico. President The Woods of Dublin Resident's Association ....... 5696 Wind wood Drive Dublin. Ohio 43017 - re: Bristol Commons Dear Vince: This letter is to confIrm our agreement resolving the opposition of The Woods of Dublin to the Bristol Commons rezoning project. Under this agreement. the developer will do the following: 1) Provide land for entry features/landscaping at the present west terminus of Rushwood Drive. An engineers drawing showing the exact courses and distances is attached to indicate the land that is involved. We will either deed this land to your association or provide a permanent easement for your association. or deed it to the two west end property owners (provided they agree to give your association a permanent easement). at your association's option. The land shall be used only for landscaping and entry features. 2) Plant pine trees or other suitable evergreens in the fence row gaps along the western edge of lots 56 and 57 of the Woods of Dublin. This planting may be in the landscape area discussed in number 1. above. 3) Share equally with your association the cost of an entry feature monument at the A present west terminus of Rushwood Drive. provided that the monument says "Bristol Commons" when viewed from the eastern side and "The Woods of Dublin" when viewed from the westward side. -- If it should happen that Rushwood Drive is vacated at its western end by City Council. we will still plant the pine trees referenced in number 2. but. item 3 would be voided. We would still cause the transfer of the entry feature land set out in number 1. but the rear yard setback (50 feet per text) would be measured from the present, eastern boundary line and not the boundary of the entry feature land. , As we discussed. these commitments are contingent on an end to the opposition by your association. and residents of the Woods of Dublin. to our latest plan for 180 lots. which includes of course. the commitments already contained in the development plan and deed restrictions. ~ . C truly yours, ,"< :JfPher T. Cline ere: pq Encl-! """'" ,..---, . C I T Y 0 F D U B L I N Department of Planning & Development STAFF REPORT DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZOl\'ING COMMISSION JANUARY 9, 1992 CASE 1: Revised Plan - Rezoning Application Z91-009 - Bristol Commons APPLICANT: Edwards Land Company, c/o Christopher T. Cline, Attorney, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017 for property owners Elizabeth T. Cook and the Estate of Donald S. Cook. REQUEST: To rezone an 85.2 acre parcel (the Cook property) located on the north side of Brand Road and the east side of Ashbaugh Road from the R-l, Restricted Suburban Residential District to the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. BACKGROUND: Plans for this site were reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 5, October 10, and November 7, 1991. In the final hearing, a motion for approval was defeated by a vote of 2 yes, 3 no, and 1 abstention. The current recommendation is therefore disapproval. A two-thirds vote of Council will be necessary to override the Planning and Zoning Commission's, recommendation and to approve that plan. The applicant has revised the plan and has requested another hearing. He now proposes a subdivision with 180 lots and a dedicated park of 12.4 acres. The gross density will be 2.11 per acre, and the park requirement will be exceeded by 0.8 acre. The site has been zoned R-l since its annexation in 1973. The surrounding densities generally range from 0.5 to 2.12 dwelling units per acre on the north side of Brand Road. To the south is Earlington Village with a density of 3.28. Under the Planned Low Density Residential District regulations, the density, minimum lot size, development standards, park, and basic street pattern are committed and become part of the rezoning ordinance. Following a recommendation here, a public\hearing, will be held at City ~ouncil on the rezoning ordinance. At a later meeting, Council will vote. A two-thirds vote will be needed to overturn the commission recommendation. The roads will be platted separately at a later \ date. 5131 Post Rd. Suite #102 Dublin, Ohio 43017 614.761,6553 FAX 761.6566 .- - -.------- - Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - January 9, 1992 Page 2 CONSIDERATIONS: 0 The plan reduces the number of units from 190, as considered in November, to 180 lots. The park is 12.4 acres which more than meets the park dedication requirements. The lots are wider and fewer in number, but the major aspects AI!!t of the previous layout have been retained. 0 The adjacent property is developed. To the south along Brand Road are several single-family residences on R-llots. Also to the south of the site are ~ single-family lots in Brandon (PUD). To the west across existing Ashbaugh Road is the Muirfield Greene project which has been under construction for two years, and tournament parking lot is to the north (both PUD). The Riverforest subdivision (R-l), Woods of Dublin (R-2), and the Treetops at Brandon condominiums are to the east. 0 Two streets from adjacent development are stubbed into the subject property, both of which were planned to provide additional access. These are Rushwood Drive in the Woods of Dublin subdivision and Crawley Drive in Brandon; both are minor residential streets. A traffic assessment was performed for the City, and the findings are contained in the letter from Gary J. Palatas, P.E., in this report. 0 There is no access into the Riverforest subdivision or out onto Muirfield Drive from this property. 0 The site has very limited frontage on Brand Road, less than 200 feet. Ashbaugh Road is still a dedicated road, but the load level of its old bridge has been downgraded and will need improvement if it is not abandoned. The city expects Ashbaugh Road to become a private road, serving only the annual tournament traffic and the property owner to the west (Coulter). ~ 0 A new access road is proposed from Brand Road. Because Ashbaugh Road will only be in use one week of the year, this proposed access location is .... acceptable, and the sight distance is adequate along Brand Road. 0 The proposed street system is circuitous to avoid cut-through traffic. The streets are shown with a 50-foot right-of-way, except for a section of the internal collector has been upgraded to 60 feet as requested. 0 A consultant is developing the FEMAlfloodway study. This is joint developer/City project so that the study area extends beyond the site. 0 The park development plan and new entry will be developed to comply with the FEMA results. This will involve less filling of the floodplain than was previously conceived for the entry. 0 The entire floodway is contaiped within the park, and no lots are affected by it. Only five lots contain some mirior floodway fringe area. \ AI - ._,_.,,~--- ~~--"--~ L1 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commi"sion Staff Report - January 9, 1992 Page 3 , 0 Utilities are available and adequate for the proposal, and a schematic utility plan shows extensions. The sanitary sewer is being routed through the southern portion of the site, paralleling the Indian Run. An easement will be provided for this. 0 The Community Plan calls for a residential density of 1.0 to 2.5 dwelling units per acre. Surrounding densities are indicated on Community Plan Figure 3.2. It should be noted that since adoption of the plan, Brandon's density was reduced to 2.12 units per acre by a plan revision. This density is comparable to Brandon's gross density, and it is lower than Brandon's if the elementary school site is excluded. 0 The proposal includes lots from 80 to 100 feet wide. Most of the lots are 100 feet wide; only a few at the southern boundary are actually 80 feet wide. 0 The subject property was farmed for many years, and most of the site is a cleared field. A tree line surrounds the site, and there are groupings of trees along the Indian Run and its tributary. 0 The required amount of park area for this proposal is 11.6 acres. The developer proposes to dedicate 12.4 acres along the Indian Run. He will also contribute $150,000 toward park development and maintain the developed park for a period of five years. 0 Storm water detention will be on the north side of the stream. The size and location of a storm water basin are shown schematically within the park. It has been delineated fairly well outside of the 1oo-year flood plain. 0 A barn remains on the site with access from Ashbaugh Road. The Parks Division is interested in maintaining it for storage. The developer agrees so long as the City upgrades its appearance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that lowering the density substantially improves this proposal. The density was a major issue of contention in the consideration of this plan. Staff believes that the 28 lot reduction, since the first plan, has provided a more spacious layout, better lots for development, and a very good neighbor for the existing development in the area. Sing1e- family residential use is appropriate, as is the proposed park acreage along the North Fork of the Indian Run. The access proposed is fully acceptable. The developer's offer to provide park improvements and to maintain them is an additional benefit of the plan. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: \ ---- Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - January 9, 1992 Page 4 Conditions: 1) That the developer dedicate 40 feet from centerline of Brand Road and cooperate in the disposition of Ashbaugh Road; 2) That flood plain development (park and bridge) be designed to conform with .~ results of pending FEMA study and that the flood hazard areas be accurately shown on all plat, planning, building permit, and engineering documents; j 3) That drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and be approved by ~' the City Engineer, and that design of all detention facilities within the park be approved by the Parks Director as well; 4) That a left turn stacking lane on Brand Road be considered as indicated in study by Gary E. Palatas, P .E., to be addressed by the developer at the time the [mal plat for the fIrst phase of subdivision; 5) That the minor areas of wetlands be indicated on the f1le set of plans; 6) That a park development and maintenance plan and bikeway extension into the subdivision be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee; 7) That roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the City Engineer; 8) That all utilities and the new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer; 9) That the sanitary sewer easement be provided; and 10) That this subdivision be subject to the standard residential height of 35 feet. Bases: 1) The plan as revised conforms with the surrounding residential development. JIIIPti>' 2) The proposed plan will meet FEMA flood hazard standards, MORPC drainage design, applicable wetlands restrictions. 3) The proposed development will comply will roadway and utility plans for the ~ area. 4) The plan exceeds the parkland requirements in both spirit and letter. 5) The plan is consistent with the goals of the Community Plan. ADDITIONAL lNFORMATION: The applicant should be advised that the City has programmed the elimination of the Ashbaugh Lift Station in its 1991 Capital Improvement Program budget. The facility has experienced problems during peak flow conditions (heavy rain), and it was always intended to be temporary. The forcemain was to be replaced by a gravity line to be paid for in part by the development of the site in question. \The developer should be aware that at least a portion of this sewer cost will be included as a special tap fee or assessment for this project. ~ - N / C 0 . ~~ - \5u.~~ I R-\ , .( S,k ,~~-""- . pCD \ . 1:.C\\-OO5 . - Bf'\os\-c\ CD~MC>Y\':> - - - lP -m , 1--- ~ cc ~ -- C 0 .",.,.~ .- - - , - .. ;\$J.~~ I R-l I ,: S\~ ~ ". .....- --.. .. R peO . ~,~-~ GARY J. PALATAS. P.E. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRAFFIC STUDIES - SIGNAL DESIGN - PAVEMENT MARKINGS , SIGNING - PARKING LAYOUT 3034 Woodloop Lane Columbu8, Ohio 43204 814-278-8945 October 27, 1991 Mr. Pat Bowman Planning Director 5131 Post Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dear Pat: I have reviewed the proposed residential development, Bristol Commons, as you requested. The proposed development would generate about 2000 total trips per day. If there was one point of access this would result in 1000 vehicles exiting the site and 1000 vehicles entering the site. For the evening peak hour the total two way traffic would be 200 vehicles pe~ hour. Since the retail developments, schools and freeway system are located south of the site the major traffic flow will be to the south. The southbound traffic should be distributed between Coffman Road and Muirfield Drive depending on the nature of the trip. If the main entrance to Bristol Commons is 36 feet wide' it should be more then adequate to handle the traffic generated by the proposed development. Consideration should be given to constructing a left turn lane on Brand Rqad for traffic entering the site. The need for this should be based on current traffic on Brand Road and future traffic generated by the development. With a development the size of Bristol Commons there should be a minimum of two points of access if possible. This would allow for emergencies and the possibility of construction in the future involving one ac~ess point. In the case of Bristol Commons the concern for emergency access is critical since the major access point requires a structure over Indian Run which could be closed as a result of flooding or structural problems sometime in the future. ~ . , t#r.>1b~ ~M0'6 \ t.err~ ft2Dt--t €J.P~, f5. (d' ~J~ "f'll4ffic.- II~ , I feel the concern with through-traffic using the development if connected to Rushwood Drive is illogical. As previously stated the major traffic flow should be to the south. Traffic on Dublin Road or from Donegal Cliffs would continue south on Dublin Road or use Brand Road to Coffman Road to go south. The distance from Donegal Cliffs to Muirfield Drive is nearly a mile to the west. For southbound traffic from Donegal Cliffs to use Muirfield Drive would result in a substantial increase in travel time for a destination to the south. Secondly ~ the circuitous layout of the proposed development does not in any way encourage cut through traffic. .~' Residences located on Rushwood Drive are located much closer to Muirfield Drive and would probably use the proposed development for access to Brand Road. Similarly, there will be traffic from Bristol Commons wanting to go north that will use Rushwood Drive. I would estimate that if a traffic count was taken on Rush~ood Drive at Windwood Drive before and after the development of Bristol Commons there would be no change or a decrease in traffic from the residences on Rushwood Drive using Bristol Commons. Through-traffic uses local streets when it decreases the travel distance and travel time. In the situation of Rushwood Drive, neither travel distance nor travel time would be reduced by use of this roadway. As a result, I feel it would be totally unnecessary for the city to become involved in purchasing right-of-way for an access from Bristol Commons to Muirfield Drive to resolve a problem I think will never exist. Therefore I would recommend that Bristol Commons shouJ~ be connected to Rushwood Drive as shown in the prelimi~ary plat submitted by M-E Engineering. A:e:7;2~ A ...... t . ~~~ Cl>MMOri~ \ LtJJ~ ffl.bH €:? f klM" ~ $ 0 z(1. j ,,' ., - - - f,r - -:... --''"- -. . -_ :,X .. -. ; '",- ~ ." '.; }'. - " -=- ." 1 , I . "--./~\ - :. \' .. - ,~ " 1 ( ',:' ~'- . -.' ,"" ',r . -. ...;- - .. ;- .-... -..:.:...,-r- ,,. , ~)\~ I i "- I !t., e::::. I ..;. '-..J . '.. ; : . - "-- - .. .tJ1f/"'to. 1:-' - -.. "-' " . " '-. , .' - ? - . - 7 ~ :: -., - -? .. \ ~ - ~ ....., ~~ ' .. f .--.;. \ . . - ... ...-:- ;r,=: . '" - '. - ,::. - '.. ,"'" \\ '\ \, '. \ '\ \ 1=0 ~E::,-r """" : I , , . I I ........ I I I ; ~ ' ' 2 ~ ~~ ,oi, (V\O...\e ' ' , '5 ~+e. 'nou,,'l'\.~ ~\es ~, \ II = ,+00' fE"fl'\A FLDC\)uJA'{ '(\\A~ - - .. '*' ~ "l'1llr'~'- "c".- ~frTe r-~,~H fLool) I NSUR.j\N~ n\~ ! \... ~f \,.\ ~ "~ \ \. ~ \. ~ ~. -' ~\ ~ \ \/6 ~ c:.1' ~! "'Jj~, \ f o (\ESl , I , \ I"'~"" I , : / : I I ; \ I . \ I \ \ I ';>, \ \l::. ~! 4-0D E\ ';>. '\~ c: p~ ,,"' i \ I \ I - . I ' . I , . \ , i i \ . \ N \ \ \ A ~ ~r-c'i<, \\'\.o..-\e I i \ : s\ \€- 'o~\'\~r\es - . ; , - . ' . . . \ ~ FE If\ A f \ R.M. \ ~\\\SlOL tDfr\h\Dt'J~ l ~ f7 ~ L-- ....,..w., ,.~ WH~$~ .: I ALD'UDCE PLACE . --..1' I "o.;A' /' ."", C I T Y 0 F D U B L I N Department of Planning & Development ~ MINUTES OF MEETING DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ,..." JANUARY 9, 1992 Chairman Geese called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Commission members present were Joel Campbell, Warren Fishman, Chairman Ron Geese, Chuck Kranstuber, Peter Leffler, Jim Manus and Judi Stillwell. Staff members present were Pat Bowman, Bobbie Clarke, Paul Willis, Steve Mack, Janet Jordan, Terry Foegler, Mitch Banchefsky, Bill Covey, Mark Jones and Emily Renkert. Mr. Kranstuber made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 7, 1991 meeting. Mr. Leffler seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Manus, abstain; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. (Approved 6-0-1.) Mrs. Stillwell asked if the last two paragraphs of page eight for the ~ December 5, 1991 meeting minutes were out of order. Mr. Bowman said he thought not, as there had been discussion after the vote. "-" Mr. Leffler made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 5, 1991 meeting. Mr. Manus seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr~ Geese, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. (Approved 7-0.) 1. Revised Plan - Rezoning Application Z91-009 - Bristol Commons Mr. Kranstuber made a motion to reconsider the Commission's action on December 5, 1991 of the Bristol Commons rezoning application Z91-009. Mr. Leffler seconded the motion. The vot~ was. as follows: Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Manus, abstain; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; and Mr. Leffler, yes. (Approved for reconsid,eration 6-0-1.) 4- 5131 Post Rd. Suite #102 Dublin, Ohio 43017 614.761.6553 FAX 761.6566 Iff, -- '"~.-._,--,.".- ~",--..'.._'-,"--_._" "j1ijjij Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1992 Page 2 Ms. Clarke presented the staff report and showed slides of the site. The site is 85.2 acres and is a rectangle with limited frontage on Brand Road. There will be no access onto Ashbaugh Road, into Muirfield, or into River Forest. The proposed dedication of 12.4 acres of parkland meets the open space requirements. The ',~ developer will develop this open space by using a minimum of $150,000 of his money for development. He will maintain it for a five-year period. It is now a subdivision of 180 single-family homes. The gross density will be 2.11 units per '~ acre. The retention pond will be a wet pond and a site amenity and has been relocated outside the 100-year floodplain. Staff recommends approval of this rezoning which is from the R-1 district to the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential district, with the following conditions: 1 ) That the developer dedicate 40 feet from centerline of Brand Road and cooperate in the disposition of Ashbaugh Road; 2) That flood plain development (park and bridge) be designed to conform with results of pending FEMA study and that the flood hazard areas be accurately shown on all plat, planning, building permit, and engineering documents; 3) That drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and be approved by the City Engineer, and that design of all detention facilities within the park be approved by the Parks Director as well; 4) That a left turn stacking lane on Brand Road be considered as indicated in study by Gary E. Palatas, P.E., to be addressed by the developer at the time the final plat for the first phase of subdivision; 5) That the minor areas of wetlands be indicated on the file set of plans; 6) That a park development and maintenance plan and bikeway extension into the subdivision be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee; 7) That roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the City Engineer; 8) That all utilities and the new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer; 9) That the sanitary sewer easement be provided; and 10) That this subdivision be subject to the standard residential height of 35 feet. Mr. Campbell wants the additional clause in condition 4 regarding the developer paying for the stacking lane: "and the developer will pay this cost of the left-turn stacking lane". He said it was included in his motion a couple of months ago. Also, he asked why the donation of thr addi_tional $150,000 for the open space development and five-year maintenance was in the "Consideration" section of the staff report and it was not a condition. Ms. Clarke said this has been included within the developer's zoning text and is part of his proposal. ,,~ ~---,_.,,- Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1992 Page 3 Mr. Banchefsky said since there will be no access through Muirfield, Mr. Fishman need not abstain on this application. Mr. Geese asked Mr. Cline if he is in agreement with the 10 conditions. Mr. Cline said yes. ~ Mr. Chris Cline said he had some interest in the present status of the park. He passed around a new plan indicating the expectations for the park. The park area is important to this area because the public will see it, and not the subdivision, ,..." from Brand Road. There was some discussion of the problems with the changes in the floodplain and the amount of development in the park. He said the new plan has a minimum amount of infrastructure in the floodway with minimum filling. The only major infrastructure-type improvements are the well and the sprinkler system. There is a wet pond for the retention. The areas to the north of Indian Run will be seeded and graded. $150,000 will be given for improvements and it will be maintained for five years. The plan has .8 acres more than the required amount of dedicated parkland. Mr. Fishman asked if the floodplain is in the park. Mr. Cline said yes. There are minor fringe areas at the rear of a couple of the lots. Ms. Clarke said this land is in the City's plan for a park acquisition. Mr. Fishman asked about maintenance after the five-year period runs out. Ms. Clarke said the applicant's design consultant has worked with the Parks Director to determine what types of vegetation and improvement will be made. The level of maintenance needed will be reasonable. Mr. Cline said the concept for the park is to convey the British, country-flowered image. !f8I;. Mr. Fishman asked if the City will be responsible for renovating the barn. Ms. Clarke said no final determination has been made. The Park Department still wants -, to use it for limited storage, but City Council may make this decision. Mr. Cline said if the City wants to keep the barn, the City will have to fix it up to match the quality of this development. Mr. Fishman asked if the sprinkler system will be extensive. Mr. Cline said the sprinkler system will be the area along the road. Mr. Russell, 5525 Ashford Road, said a drainage canal runs through his property and then into the proposed development. He wants the developer to acknowledge it and maintain it. Mr. Steve Mack sai~ the _developer has the obligation to accept and transport off-site drainage that enters the'property. - . - ,. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1992 Page 4 Kris Hess, 5802 Rushwood Drive, said the Woods of Dublin neighbors had formally petitioned City Council last Monday evening to request the closing of Rushwood Drive. She said the basic street pattern is part of the rezoning ordinance according to the Planned low Density Residential district regulations. She referred to the staff report consideration that "The proposed street system is circuitous to avoid cut-through traffic. II The consultant agrees that there should be no cut-through traffic. The fire chief said he wants access to Rushwood Drive and the Woods of Dublin. She disagrees with the staff report which states that this plan is consistent with the goals of the Community Plan. She quoted an excerpt from the Community Plan, "it is vital to maintain the community's well being and positive image. Their protection will receive continuing consideration". Principle #4 states "provide a sound framework for neighborhoods by preventing them from being bisected by major trafficways or isolated from necessary community services". Item #9 states, "assure traffic safety through design of street systems which discourage through-traffic in residential neighborhoods and by severely limiting uses which generate non-residential traffic". She then referred to Page 18 of the Community Plan, Trafficways, Section B, #2: "Provide residential neighborhoods from through-traffic or non-residential volumes." She said the Rushwood route is 1 1/2 miles to Brand Road with no stop sign for almost a mile. Route 745, which the City's traffic consultant says is the way people will go, is 2 1/2 miles. She asked that the position on the street system be reconsidered and that the Rushwood Drive access be closed off. She asked that only emergency access be provided. Ms. Peggy Miller, of Treetops Condominiums, asked if there is a plan for mounding the area abutting the condominiums. She feels this would add privacy to both developments. Mr. Cline said there is a very good fence line along this area, but Treetops is built only 20 feet from the property line. Mr. Jim Everhart, 5806 Rushwood Drive, referred to the letter from Chris Cline to Vince lodico, President of the Woods of Dublin Resident's Association, dated January 8, 1992, confirming the developer's agreement. Mr. Cline said there has been a last minute change to this agreement which states, "even if the road is vacated, the developer will donate the two pieces of land for the buffer. However, the 50-foot rear yard R-1 setback will run from the property line and not from the edge of those parcels." Mr. Leffler asked if the Association is in agreement with this? Mr. Everhart said yes. Mr. Cline said the triangles will be maintained and controlled by the Woods of Dublin. \ \ - Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1992 Page 5 Mrs. Stillwell commended Mr. Cline and the developer for the parkland dedication and the extra $150,000. She asked how, according to the PUD provisions, the proposed development advances the general welfare of the municipality and the immediate vicinity? Also, she asked how the benefits, improved arrangement and design of the proposed development justify deviation from standard residential development requirements. Mr. Cline said it improves the community by being ..... very appropriate for the site. He said the lots are comparable to Muirfield and the quality is high. He said PLDR zoning is being used because the zoning code is not economical. R-3 is a developable zoning category. R-2, with 100-foot front and ..... 20,000 square feet is not economically feasible. Mr. Leffler commended Mr. Cline for. his hard work and said this development is an nice amenity to Dublin. Mr. Manus said the density problem has been solved. He appreciates the park and the five-year maintenance plan. After reading the traffic consultant's report, he is in support of this plan. Mr. Campbell asked if there will be stop signs at the T-intersections? Mr. Mack said yes. Mr. Kranstuber asked what is meant by statement #2 in the agreement "Plant pine trees or other suitable evergreens in the fence row gaps along the western edge of lots 56 and 57 of the Woods of Dublin?" Mr. Cline said there are gaps in the fence line and pine trees will be used to fill them. Mr. Kranstuber asked that these be of high quality and fairly large pine trees. He also asked about the Rushwood Drive drop-off. Mr. Cline said the actual grade change takes place on the Harden's ,. and the Everhart's lot which were filled substantially. There is nothing to be done to meet the grade because the fence row would be destroyed. Mr. Kranstuber - asked about construction traffic. Mr. Cline said Rushwood Drive will not connect until the final phase. The Woods of Dublin residents asked if there could be a guarantee that the construction traffic would not use this road. Mr. Kranstuber said he appreciates the hard work of Mr. Cline and the developer and said it answers the concerns of all of the residents. Mr. Fishman said he is appreciative that the density issue has been resolved. ~ . \ '" Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1992 Page 6 Mr. Campbell made a motion to approve the application subject to the following conditions: 1 ) That the developer dedicate 40 feet from centerline of Brand Road and cooperate in the disposition of Ashbaugh Road; - 2) That flood plain development (park and bridge) be designed to conform with results of pending FEMA study and that the flood hazard areas be accurately ,- shown on all plat, planning, building permit, and engineering documents; 3) That drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and be approved by the City Engineer, and that design of all detention facilities within the park be approved by the Parks Director as well; 4) That a left turn stacking lane on Brand Road be addressed as indicated in study by Gary E. Palatas, P.E., by the developer at the time the final plat for the first phase of the subdivision, be assessed as satisfactory by the engineering staff, and be installed entirely at the developer's expense if determined to be necessary; 5) That the minor areas of wetlands be indicated on the file set of plans; 6) That a park development and maintenance plan and bikeway extension into the subdivision be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee; 7) That roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the City Engineer; 8) That all utilities and the new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer; 9) That the sanitary sewer easement be provided; """" 1 0) That this subdivision be subject to the standard residential height of 35 feet; and 11 ) That the provisions of the letter dated January 8, 1992, from Chris Cline to Mr. Vince Lodico of the Woods of Dublin Resident's Association be ;JIIiII" incorporated as commitments by the developer in the rezoning ordinance. Mr. Manus seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Geese, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; and Mr. Campbell, yes. (Approved 7-0.) \ \ C'-"'~"'" C I T y 0 F D U B L I N Dep&flment of PIEnning & Development I!f/I/IIIf -" DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 7, 1991 Commission members present were Joel Campbell, Warren Fishman, Ron Geese, Chuck Kranstuber, Peter Leffler, and Judi Stillwell. Jim Manus was absent. Staff members present were: Terry Foegler, Pat Bowman, Paul Willis, Peter Lenz, Steve Mack, Lisa Fierce, Bill Covey, and Mitch Banchefsky. Mr. Campbell made a motion to approve the October 10, 1991 meeting minutes. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Fishman, abstain; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. (Motion was passed 5-0-1.) 1. Rezoning Application Z91-009 - Bristol Commons Mrs. Stillwell made a motion to take Bristol Commons off the table. Mr. .. Kranstuber seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Fishman, abstain; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. (Motion was passed 5-0-1). .... Mr. Bowman presented the staff report and slides of the site. He said the number of lots was reduced from 208 to 190. The parkland along Indian Run has been enlarged to meet the park dedication requirement. Two minor residential streets (Rushwood Drive and Crawley Drive) from the adjacent developments will provide additional access to the site. Gary Palatas, P.E., submitted a letter that the proposed street system is adequate. There is no proposed access to the River Forest subdivision or out onto Muirfield Drive. Staff and the traffic consultant recommend no tie-in to Muirfield Drive, based on the number of units and the ability of Brand Road to handle the dislributi_on of traffic. The City supports the eventual abandonment of Ashbaugh Road. In- discussions with the golf club and the adjoining property owners, Ashbaugh Road will exist as a private road for use by the tournament and Mr. Coulter (adjoining property owner only. The e~tire f _~I H ;.:5+::'r Bl" tv 0 v. r 1- ,." ; ", v..-k-s itS 5731 Post Rd. Suite 4/702 Dublin, Ohio -'3077 614.761.6553 '. FAX 767.6566 All Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 Page 2 floodway of Indian Run is contained within the 12.5 acres of park. The applicant has agreed to contribute up to $ 150,000 toward park development and to maintain it for several years. The lots range from 80 ft. to 100 ft. in width. The mix of lots sizes is in line with surrounding developments in both neighborhoods. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with the following conditions: ~ 1 ) That the developer dedicate 40 feet from centerline of Brand Road and cooperate in the disposition of Ashbaugh Road; 2) That development (park and bridge) be designed to conform with results of pending FEMA study and that the flood hazard areas be accurately shown on all plat, planning, building permit, and engineering documents; 3) That drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and be approved by the City Engineer, and that design of all detention facilities within the park be approved by the Parks Director as well; 4) That a left turn stacking lane on Brand Road be considered as indicated in study by Gary E. Palatas, P.E., to be addressed by the developer at the time the final plat for the first phase of subdivision; 5) That the minor areas of wetlands reported be shown on the plans; 6) That a park development and maintenance plan and bikeway extension into the subdivision be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee; 7) That roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the City Engineer; 8) That all utilities and the new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer; ,- 9) That the sanitary sewer easement be provided; and 10) That this subdivision be subject to the standard residential height of 35 feet. Mr. Geese asked what is the justification for permitting any filling within the flood plain? Mr. Bowman said there was concern that the original park plans might require considerable filling and that the proposed retention basin within the floodplain would require filling. The retention is now outside the 1 DO-year floodplain. Based upon the continuing floodway studies, improvements for the park which do not interfere with the floodplain can be pinpointed. Chris Cline, attorney, said they are waiting on the FEMA study to determine the floodplain. The developer will maintain the park for the first five years. Pine trees will be planted along the rear of the River Forest lots. The Woods of Dublin residents have requested that the pinet trees_ be planted in the gaps in the tree line. The deed restrictions of Coventry Woods will be used for Bristol Commons. He said the easement west of the tree line for the existing road will be dedicated, but there will not be a contribution made towa~d maintenance. He said the wetlands ""~ i'M ~ .....\~ lV C 1/ ~ I r 1- :. i'll', V\ v,~:- zit) . -, Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 Page 3 Mr. Geese asked for clarification of a quorum. Mr. Banchefsky said this rezoning application will require a majority of the entire commission (four members) to take any action. An abstention will count as a "no" vote. Sue Hardin of Rushwood Drive read a letter from Joe Hardin, who feels the density issue is not being addressed. He would like to see the architectural continuity for ~ this subdivision. She said when she moved to Rushwood Drive, she was told by the City that this property would not be developed with more homes than what ......, was currently planned. Craig Otter of Rushwood Drive said there are two adjacent streets which are stubbed into this property, both of which were planned to provide additional access to this property. He said there is nothing in the 1988 Community Plan which states that Rushwood Drive is to connect to anything. Because there is a stub, does not mean it should connect to something. He asked for traffic studies on the connectors. He said the density is higher than any other area north of Brand Road. The additional traffic poses a hazard to the children playing in the area. He would like to see the zoning remain R-1. Rand Thomas asked for current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and forecasting counts of the impact of this development. How will the additional ADT be distributed? He is also concerned about additional ADT distributed onto Brand Road during peak hours. He expressed concern about the impact on the infrastructure and schools. He asked about the signage requirements, materials, the landscape plan, and home values. Kris Hess of Rushwood Drive said the residents are concerned about the safety of ......, the neighborhoods, cut-through traffic, and neighborhood identity. The issue is density. She conducted a survey and asked the following five questions: - 1. What route do you travel to work? 2. Do you go through Brandon to get to Brand Road? 3. If yes, why? 4. How would you get to the Perimeter Mall area? 5. Given the three ways to an intersection of Brand Road and Muirfield Drive, which would you choose? More than half would use 1-270 to travel to work. 64% would reach the Perimeter Mall area by way of Brand Road and Muirfield Road, indicating that there is preference to go west then south. 62 ~ of ~hose surveyed indicated that they do cut through Brandon. The primary reason for -the cut-through is because it is quicker and/or shorter. Of the three choices given: Brand Road, Brandon or / Rushwood Drive, 49% chose Rushwood DrJve. ~-s{c("~ fristo{ ~O\l. 41 P,,"Z m:1't4ks 8(6 ,. . ~'~ " "'-"~.4._ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 Page 4 Ms. Hess said she looked at the impact of the traffic through Bristol Commons utilized from the Brand Road entrance. The single access volume would be 2,000, however, the volume increases by more than 300 trips with a Rushwood Drive access. If the Woods of Dublin and Donegal Cliff numbers were increased by only 1/2 trip each, the percentage rise in volume would be 22 %. The Rushwood Drive ,;~ access compounds the traffic volume at the Bristol Commons entrance. She said J the residents are especially concerned with traffic along Brand Road, particularly between Muirfield Drive and Bristol Commons. She was concerned only with the '.- peak evening rush hour and used only the traffic from Brandon, Bristol Commons, as well as the Woods of Dublin and Donegal Cliffs cut-throughs. This area could easily become congested because of the street connections and the density. The scenic collector is not being preserved. She suggested an emergency only access path or strip. Mr. Geese asked Ms. Hess what traffic map she showed the Donegal Cliff residents. Ms. Hess used the map included in the packet. He asked her if when she bought her house, if she felt that Rushwood Drive would always be a dead- end. She said she assumed it would tie into Brandon or Muirfield, never to Brand Road. She said the residents do not want Rushwood Drive to tie into Muirfield Drive. Mr. Geese said that only leaves Brandon which is not practical. She said Brandon allows access to the school and swimming pool. He asked her if she has read the Chief Bostic's comments. She said yes. She said Indian Hill Road in River Forest has always been stubbed and does not go into Muirfield. Greg Whitmer of the Woods of Dublin said this proposed development impacts negatively impacts many different neighborhoods. It increases population to already overcrowded schools and the infrastructure. It may affect their property values and children's safety. If the developer can connect with existing services, he will reduce his costs of development. As a result, he only supports the development of 85 homes. He asked that this Commission consider the concerns of the residents of Rushwood Drive over the profitable endeavors of the developer. ; Jody Everhart of Rushwood Drive said she also called the City and was told that it was zoned for one acre lots and would go down to 1/2 acre lots. She said she also didn't expect a connection to Brand Road. Regarding the emergency access, there will be two ways to get into the Woods of Dublin, Route 745 and through Brandon. Bill Root, resident of Muirfiel.d and ~eprtese~~ative of the Muirfield Association, supports staff recommendation as It pertains to the non-access onto Muirfield Drive. He said the bikepaths in Muirfield are supported and financed by the residents in Muirfield. \ t+i~i-erj }6('::A-c I Nt",. P+2 (}th~~ 41~ - Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 . Page 5 Larry Holbrook, Manager of The Muirfield Association, said the Association agrees with staff's recommendation for this project. He presented a 766 signature petition opposing the Muirfield Drive connector. Mr. Kranstuber said he feels staff should have made the decision about the road network from the outset. The flood problems extend beyond this plot of land. The ... park proposal is good. He doesn't support the extension from Bristol Commons into Muirfield Drive. He fears that this land will be sold by this developer and unsatisfactorily developed. -- Mr. Campbell said if this application is approved, some people will distrust the decision even though the Commission feels it is the right thing for the City. Also, there are some people who feel that the Commission does not know what it is doing. He pointed out that this is the first meeting for some of the residents. He said that change is a fact of life in Dublin. Sometimes staff hires consultants and they are objective. Mr. Campbell asked if this Planned Low Density rezoning is approved, will there be an opportunity for further discussion? Mr. Banchefsky said this application will go to City Council and the plan will constitute the rezoning. Mr. Campbell asked about the deed restrictions. Mr. Cline said the deed restrictions do not control the quality of the development but are for the protection of the property owners. The Woods of Dublin deed restrictions require a single story house to be 1,800 square feet and a multiple story house to be 2,000 square feet. He said there will be an architectural review process that the developer imposes that will provide protection. Mr. Campbell asked if something could be ,. built into the architectural review process which would assure who will be handling it and for what length of time? -- Mr. Campbell asked if this application is approved in its current stage, will the final plat deal with the final determination of the stormwater control issues? Mr. Mack said yes and that with the FEMA study underway, the only aspect which is covered by this is the access bridge. The rest of the FEMA study will deal with Indian Run which is outside the scope of this project. The detention basins have been moved out of the 1 OO-year flood area and minimal grade changes have been made inside this 'area. The only elevation changes will be for the entrance road. The other concerns will be dealt with in the final plat. Mr. Campbell asked who will pay for the left turn stacking lane? Mr. Cline said the developer will pay for it. The necessity of this lane will be determined by the City Engineer. \ l.Ji::;40('j I 56 ~-\-o I Nell. p ~ z.. (Y\; 1\ v..-\-<es 51e 61 '~-~'-~'~-""-'-"- - -'."'~"'~'=->" _._---,,---- ~"'" . Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, , 991 . Page 6 Ms. Stillwell said the Commission balances the concerns of the residents with those of the developer in terms of the long term vision for the City. She is concerned about the architectural design review and density. She said four bases for approval for the zoning were presented in the staff report, but she is not certain that they have been met. ,-, Mr. Leffler said the retention in the parkland is a way for the developer to obtain retention and still satisfy his parkland requirement. He asked about what the "~ concept is regarding bikeways. Mr. Cline said he has received no plan from the Parks and Recreation department. Mr. Leffler referred to the text, condition H. He asked if condition H has been checked against the zoning requirements in terms of the front yard and rear yard setbacks and sideyard requirements. Are they consistent with the Dublin Code? Mr. Cline said it is a planned district and the developer is permitted to set the requirements, but these are very typical. Mr. Leffler said more entries are preferable. Mr. Geese asked why the PUD zoning is not being used. Mr. Cline said this is to be a non-mixed use development (no office or commercial, etc.). He said there is nothing more required of an applicant with the PUD than the PLR except an additional approval procedure by P&Z. Mr. Geese asked, if this issue passes, what happens? Mr. Banchefsky said it goes to City Council, and if City Council approves it, that constitutes the rezoning. Mr. Bowman said a public hearing before City Council will be scheduled with notices sent to the residents. A third reading will be held later and Council will vote. Mr. Banchefsky said if this application fails this evening, it still goes to Council with this Commission's recommendation. For Council to take action contrary to the recommendation of the Planning Commission, it would require a 2/3 override vote of Council. Mr. Kranstuber asked if a PLR can be used with development text attached? Mr. Bowman said that is being done. Mr. Kranstuber said he is not as concerned with the lot size as to whom the developer is selling. He said when density is higher than 3/4 of the developments around it, and there is nothing in the text to guarantee quality, there could be a problem. Mr. Cline explained the bordering developments. This development's density is 2.23. The single-family section of Brandon, per the Brandon PUD, is 2.4. As was indicated, the entire northeast section has been changed to R-2 lots to interface with River Forest. The Woods of Dublin will have less traffic after this project is built because the people in the Woods of Dublin will be cutting through Bristol Commons. The proposed cost of homes is $180,000 to $300,000 +. trchit.ectural review standards are being requested although they have never been required of any other developer in Dublin. He emphasized that the developer, Pete Edwards, has a very good reputation for quality developments. 1f(5-tor516r~5i-e I Ne\J. q) P+Z- m; "'v..~es ~ 1'0 ,~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 Page 7 Mr. Campbell commended the developer on the traffic presentation. The density is a concern of his but not enough of a concern to vote no. He said he is aware of architectural review committees in other developments. He would like to see a requirement built into the text of an architectural review, with an architect who would be retained to look at each design. Mr. Cline said the deed restrictions for Coventry Woods provide for architectural review and those same deed restrictions ..... will be used for this development. He said deed restrictions are not required by Code, but he said he wouldn't have a problem using the Woods of Dublin restrictions as a condition of approval. - Mr. Campbell made a motion to approve the application subject to the following conditions: 1 ) That the developer dedicate 40 feet from centerline of Brand Road and cooperate in the disposition of Ashbaugh Road; 2) That development (park and bridge) be designed to conform with results of pending FEMA study and that the flood hazard areas be accurately shown on all plat, planning, building permit, and engineering documents; 3) That drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and be approved by the City Engineer, and that design of all detention facilities within the park be approved by the Parks Director as well; 4) That a left turn stacking lane on Brand Road be considered as indicated in study by Gary E. Palatas, P.E., to be addressed by the developer at the time the final plat for the first phase of subdivision, will be satisfactory to the engineering staff and the developer will pay this cost of the left-turn stacking lane; JIll 5) That a park development and maintenance plan and bikeway extension into the subdivision be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee; 6) That roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the '- City Engineer; 7) That all utilities and the new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer; 8) That the sanitary sewer easement be provided; 9) That this subdivision be subject to the standard residential height of 35 feet; and 10) That there is an architectural review committee provided for in the text requiring an architect to be involved in the review process, the text language is to be satisfactory to staff and subject to the Commission's review at the final plat, and deed restrictions ~ot less than those for the Woods of Dublin are to be prepared and submitted at final plat. l+i:51-orj 1 ~f'\~{C I \ Nef.9l p,.z.n\:I'\\'\'\-€s II~ - .' '~'" '~ T . " -"-~'..'~-"-""- .._,-, '" Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - November 7, 1991 Page 8 Mr. Leffler seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, abstain; Mr. Geese, no; Mr. Kranstuber, no; Ms. Stillwell, no; Mr. Campbell, yes; and Mr. Leffler, yes. (Application was not approved: 2-yes; 3-no; 1-abstain. As outlined by the Assistant Law Director, the recommendation to be forwarded to City Council will be disapproval.) 'P~ Mr. Banchefsky said that for City Council to override the negative recommendation will require the 2/3 majority. Mr. Campbell said four affirmative votes were not received from this Commission so this is a rejection. The applicant can pursue this application before City Council, and it will require five affirmative votes to reverse this recommendation. 2. Rezoning Application Z91-010 - Shepherd Property on Cosgray Road Mr. Bowman said the modifications have been made and- a positive recommendation can now be made with the conditions listed below: , ) The permitted use section of the text shall be amended to clarity the "light" manufacturing nature of uses and temporary uses (topsoil and athletic fields); 2) The southbound left turn lane into the north access road should be built initially to facilitate construction; 3) The applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along Cosgray Road (40' from centerline) consistent with the expected update of the Circulation Element of ""'" the Community Plan; 4) The final alignment of the street extension to the east or south shall be determined by the City Engineer; 5) Where the text does not address specific alternate standards, the standards in the Code shall apply; 6) Figure 4, Landscape Plan, shall be corrected to indicate Street Tree Program and Perimeter Buffer graphics properly; and 7) The pedestrian pathway system shall be subject to the specific approval of City Council., Referring to condition #3 above, Mr. Bowman said staff will sponsor an update of the Thoroughfare Plan within the next six months pertaining to this area and several other areas. A right-of-way of 80' will be recommended for Cosgray Road. Once this is done, Mr. Shepherd has apreed_ to dedicate the additional 40'. \ . -, \ ,*,~~r~ } Brl~cl NolI.q\ r-tzM:\.\\i"k:s <ale "'" -..--.----" Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, 1991 . Page 2 . 1. REZONING APPLICATION Z91-009 - BRISTOL COMMONS Ms. Clarke showed slides of the site and presented the staff report. The site has a tree row around the edge and tree lined swales, but it is mostly a flat, open field. There have been several revisions to the plan since last month. This is a rezoning application requesting PLR for 201 lots. The acreage of the park has been ,-. expanded and the number of lots has been dropped. Just recently the City became aware of the tournament's dependence upon Ashbaugh Road. It is feared that if Ashbaugh Road were closed, there would be inadequate access for parking and "" egress from the tournament. This problem has not yet been resolved. Staff recommends that this case be tabled until the issues raised in the staff report are resolved. 1 ) Because of the number of units involved, direct access to the arterial, Muirfield Drive, should be investigated. If access can be taken from Muirfield Drive, a traffic engineer could examine the proposal and perhaps discontinue the planned connections with the two subdivisions. There is a good deal of opposition to those street connections. Staff feels as long as Brand Road is the major access for this, that those have to be maintained. If better access to the site is found, this can be re-examined. 2) The resolution of the tournament access with regard to Ashbaugh Road. Ashbaugh Road has an aging bridge structure which the City would like to take out of service. 3) A FEMA floodway study is underway on the proposed bridge into the subdivision. The flood hazard areas need to be accurately shown on all plats, building permit and engineering documents. JI///fIJ';t 4) The fill activity within the flood hazard area be kept to a minimum, and this may require some alteration in the proposed park design. Any proposal for development should keep the fill activity at minimum. ~, 5) The street connections should be maintained unless a better traffic plan is devised. 6) The right-of-way consistent with the Community Plan be dedicated. 7) The drainage detention comply with MORPC guidelines and any detention facility within the park be approved by the Parks Director. The size of their stormwater detention ponds is unknown but they will be located on the north side of the stream which appears to be park area. 8) A wetlands evaluation will be performed. 9) That the park development/acre3ge/maintenance plan be approved by the Parks Director and the Parks an Recreation Committee. The Parks and Recreation Committee did review the concept and approved it in principle but said they wanted to make sure tJ;1ese other details are worked out. ~~~ \ I3r\";)~o 1 ad-. C\ \ P +"Z.. J'V\', ",v...~S dlo j/IJ . - ~ .'''''--''.'--'-'''~-''-'._'-~''---~--'~"~'='~''''''''.~~''''.''''.'' Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, 1991 Page 3 10) The roadway drainage along Brand Road be maintained as approved by the, City Engineer. 11 ) All utilities and new street intersection be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer. 12) That the street right-of~way for the internal collector be upgraded to 60 feet. - 13) The necessary easement for the sanitary sewer, which is being constructed ) this year by the City of Dublin along the south edge of the property, be provided. c..<~ 14) Design justification for the wider driveways be submitted for consideration. Ms. Clarke said there is a new plan which has 7 fewer units. The houses have been pushed back farther from the floodway. There is no lot which contains floodway (the channel which carries the rushing water during a flood). There are 10 lots which have some minor portion of floodway fringe (the land which gets wet but is not carrying the rushing water). The City is building a sanitary sewer which will service this site and will be looking at some way for this developer to pay his fair share of this sewer extension. Ms. Clarke referred to the letter from Mr. Tuttle, of River Forest, who is in support of this and a second property owner, who requested R-1 standards and a vegetation screen to the rear of their lots. The developer has cooperated with the River Forest owners, and their issues have been addressed by this plan. Chris Hess, of Woods of Dublin, submitted an extensive report which was distributed this evening. Mr. Bowman said that even though staff is recommending this application be tabled, they don't want it to languish. The land use is single-family. The cut to Muirfield Drive is not necessarily under the control of the developer. Staff will have to ascertain the desirability on the part of the municipality. If there is not access to an arterial, the local streets will have to be connected. This should disperse the traffic on a local street system. The residents want a detailed report (traffic engineering principles) which includes traffic forecasts for these local streets. Additionally, they want to know that the streets are within safety requirements and meet the definition of local streets by the accepted standards. Mr. Mack said the Engineering Division has agreed with the developer on a consultant (EMH&T). The consultant has started the preliminary work on the FEMA study. Depending on the progress of the design of the bridge, the next 30 days should yield a FEMA study. ~ . Mr. Willis said he attended a mini-seminar a few days ago on some new provisions of the Federal Stormwater Pollutant Discharge Act as it relates to construction , ~b-\-o~~ 1l3f'\~ -to I k ~-\-. q\ \?<t- -z.. m: ~ v.. S 2/10 .... -' -"'_.'----_._---'---,~~~~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, 1991 Page 4 projects. It will be effective November 18th of this year. It will be administered through the Ohio EPA. It requires that the developer of projects disturbing five acres or more of land to obtain a permit from the Ohio EPA. The permit will require erosion control on the project. There are a number of ways which erosion can be controlled: groundcover, silt fences, settling basins and straw bales. Ground covers are considered to be the most effective and straw bales the least ~ effective. New projects requiring the permit must be submitted 90 days before the start of construction. Existing projects that will still be active on November 18th of this year need to be filed by November 18th. The Ohio EPA expects to issue ~ those permits within a SO-day period but they have not worked out the details. He distributed handouts to the applicants at the meeting. Mr. Chris Cline, attorney, said he would like to move forward with the hearing instead of tabling this application. He said the major concern is working with the residents to increase their degree of comfort. In the 1,300 ft. stretch on the northeastern portion of the site, there are two subdivisions, River Forest (R-1) and The Woods of Dublin (R-2 with 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lots). The Woods of Dublin residents were very concerned with the access as well as the lot sizes. The proposed lots in the northeast corner are R-2, 20,000 sq. ft. lots with an excess of 100 ft. in frontage. An agreement with River Forest has been made to have R-1 rear yard setbacks (50 feet from the rear yard line.) The residents have asked for pine trees and that there be no drainage onto their land from the site as the grading takes place. Lots have been eliminated due to the large volume of water running through them. The park plan has been changed slightly. With these changes, seven lots have been eliminated and there are now 201 lots. The planning on traffic access has been done by the City. It was the City's ... decision to take Ashbaugh Road out of service and to tie this into Muirfield Drive. He said they were deprived of the 1,600 feet of frontage along Ashbaugh Road for --- access which leaves them Brand Road plus the two stubs the City is requiring into the Woods of Dublin and Brandon. They are concerned with how they are going to have access to the site from those three points. The intersection with Brand Road is indicated as adequate in the staff report. He said the sight distances are adequate to serve the development. The intersection of two 60-foot right-of-ways are an adequate amount of access in that direction. 2,000 movements per day from this site are anticipated. A Muirfield Drive access is not necessary. In terms of peak a.m. traffic, he feels it wouldn't make sense to have access to Muirfield Drive because most of the traffic will probably be heading south. They would have to go north, make a U-turn and come ~ack. There might be some benefit with peak p.m. traffic. He said the applica t is not anxious to see a cut-through to Muirfield with this plan because this would mal<e a cut-through from Muirfield Drive through the Woods of Dublin, raising\problems for them. ~;:>-kC'~ ( t)r~"j\-o \ Oct. '\ , P... Z m: W\.~~~ . 3/ JO "" ~.~- ~ -w~ ~- -.,......- ~- "> , Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1991 Page 5 Mr. Cline continued. In regard to Ashbaugh Road, to the north of the site, there are 40 acres of parking, 4,000 cars, during the tournament. A meeting was held to discuss the traffic access issues (Chief Bostic, Dublin engineers, police who regulate traffic, Muirfield Tournament people, the applicant) and talked about the traffic. Using Ashbaugh Road as a driveway to the parking lots was something ,'" which everyone agreed to. Muirfield Drive, during the peak times, cannot handle the extra 4,000 cars. Cars coming from the east on Brand Road go in the parking lots. When the tournament lets out, the traffic is routed east onto Brand Road '"-' again. The tournament traffic coordinator thinks they need Ashbaugh Road or some other access to Brand Road in order to regulate their traffic. The applicant offered to let the traffic travel through the subdivision. The tournament didn't think that was a good idea. Ashbaugh Road has not been maintained and has been virtually abandoned. The tournament has maintained it for the past few years. The bridge is old and was constructed with used materials. The Dublin engineering department expects its capacity to be further downgraded. The City won't accept continuing responsibility for Ashbaugh Road. The standards which the City has to meet are significantly higher than a private person would have to meet. It is possible that the four land owners who are involved can work an agreement where Muirfield will be given an access easement for the use of Ashbaugh Road and would be responsible for the maintenance of the road and the bridge. Mr. Coulter, property owner on the west side of Ashbaugh Road, would have to get the access which he is entitled to gain access to the north side of his property. If Ashbaugh is left in place, it would only be used for the tournament when there are two policemen to control the traffic. Mr. Cline continued. The sizes of the single-family lots are comparable to Brandon. The buildable front footage was categorized and a buildable category was assigned to each one. Density is not a factor as much as the lot sizes and front footages. Mr. Cline passed around the newest version of the park plan. The configuration of the park will depend on the FEMA study and the degree to which the applicant can solve some of the high water problems. A bridge can be built across the lower area. The applicant can dedicate the full amount of the park and develop the site. Some improvements may be made downstream which will help to alleviate some of the flooding problems. This application shouldn't be held up for the FEMA study. Engineering by the applicant can't be started until the zoning is approved. The park plan is subject to the approval of the Parks and Recreation Committee and City staff. The floodway study will encompass the area from Muirfield Drive to the point where the north fork of Indian Run passes underneath Brand Road. The request for the internal collector was to make it 60 feet. All of the places draining into the collector would be actessing the 60-foot collector. He said the applicant does not want to pursue the driveway issue of 30 ft. vs. 20 ft. lt~-\ot\) {&-~5rc \ Oc--.\ . q I f + 7- /Y\ ~ n \.\,~".:> . 41/0 ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1991 Page 6 Mr. Hugh Miller, 7835 Bartles Avenue (Treetops Condominium), said he would like protection for the area west of the property line so that no construction would damage the trees which are on the east property line. There is an easement of 10 feet to the east of the property line which is protected by deed restrictions. Mr. Cline said the text addresses this and the treeline on the edge of the woods would be preserved. ,-., Ms. Chris Hess, 5802 Rushwood Drive, presented to the Commission a petition from the Woods of Dublin stating three items: '>iiiiliI'" 1. That they don't support a density exceeding 1.8; 2. That any reduction in the City standard for the greens pace requirement should not be acceptable; and 3. The City's plan for creating through-traffic on Rushwood Drive, placing the Woods of Dublin between Donegal Cliffs with 256 homes and the Bristol Commons proposed at 201 should not be approved. There are 65 occupied dwellings in the Woods of Dublin and 48 households signed this petition. Of the 37 occupied dwellings on Rushwood Drive, 32 households are represented on the petition and five were unavailable. She referred to her written report detailing her concerns with the new development and the connection with Rushwood. She asked that the Commission study it. She said she was unaware that the park acreage changed slightly and said her calculations might be off. She suggested that Donegal Cliffs' traffic will cut across Route 745 and come through Rushwood Drive and Bristol Commons. She asked for someone to name a comparable street to Rushwood Drive which is also sandwiched in between two large developments and only being a 25-foot wide street. She said it is not .... necessary to go to the maximum limit on every land development because the schools are overcrowded. -- Jim Everhart, 5806 Rushwood Drive, is concerned with the high concentration of the housing in this development. He said many of the lots are undersized and irregular (triangular lots). Traffic would increase with this high density housing and the highly traveled roads become even more unsafe. School overcrowding, along with the increase in water/sewer demand are also concerns. He requested a green space of 25 feet between the development and the adjoining properties. There is a significant difference in elevation of land from his property to the farmland. In order to preserve the treeline, this 25 feet is necessary for a transition. He wants this development to have the same deed restrictions as the Woods of Dublin and no construction traffic into the Woods~of Dublin during development. ,*,i5\o~ 16:~~~ \ \ Da..-\ . '\. \ (' * 2- t'\'\. V\. ~-\.es -5-f,6---'-- . ~,",.-"_.".,,",,, ,-,'~..- ~.,", Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, , 991 Page 7 Joe Hardin, 5799 Rushwood Drive, asked the Commission to look at the map Ms. Hess prepared which shows the direct route Rushwood Drive is between Route 745 on the upper end and Brand Road. It is a 25-foot street and when two people park their cars in the street now, it is difficult to drive through with a regular automobile. He said if the density of housing increasingly becomes greater, traffic ~, gridlock will occur as in other areas of the City. He suggested lowering the density with each new development because of the schools and general traffic flow. He said the residents are not concerned about the acreage of the park. The issue is >~~ the 30-50 lots difference between his development and what should be developed. Sewage/water, traffic and overcrowding of schools have not been addressed. Lee Vermeer, 6001 Brand Road, suggested all the concerns regarding flooding should be addressed and that the number of streets in and out of the development should be reduced. An entrance from Muirfield Drive should be explored. One additional street into this development would enhance other traffic flow from the others. Terry Mance, 7723 Crawley Road, said he is concerned with the traffic pattern and the cars cutting through Brandon to Route 745, and he is concerned with the childrens'safety. The number of bikepaths through Brandon have been stopped and he wants to see these continued in the adjoining development. He is also concerned about the density issues regarding the schools and the sewer. Pete Edwards, developer, said if the park in front is not developed; the density drops. If the park is not wanted, it will not be done. He thinks the park will keep the neighborhood to a very high standard and 10 lots doesn't make a difference either way. He said he understands the residents' request of having Rushwood Drive as a cul-de-sac, but the City says it cannot approve it. Mr. Geese asked where recently has there been a development plan other that a PUD. Ms. Clarke said Coventry Woods, PLR; Heather Glen, PLR; Lowell Trace. The next step in the PLR is the platting of the road. She said a PLR zoning is not the same exhaustive system a's in the PUD. Mr. Fishman said the problem is density. When it is said that Bob Webb's development has 50-foot lots, those are zero lot line cluster houses. That is a special design within the development. The whole area affects this development site. Mr. Cline said Muirfield and Brandon impact the developability of this site. The only part of Muirfield which touches this site and affects its developability is the vacant parking lot (40 acres to the/north)., .. J I 1+15{o~ Br~:5fo \ Cc~. ad fT Z 11-'\; I\"~ ~J,o ,'..... Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1991 . Page 8 Mr. Kranstuber asked Mr. Cline if he is requesting a vote this evening. Mr. Cline said he is leaving it up to the Commission. Mr. Kranstuber asked if there are any areas of the application which could be eliminated, i.e. the Muirfield connection. Ms. Clarke said there is heavy opposition to the connections of the road into other subdivisions, and the residents have been told that if better access to the site is found, the roads may not be connected. The only way to gain better access to the .- site, is if it can feed directly out onto an arterial. Muirfield Drive is the only arterial possibility. Mr. Kranstuber suggested that if the Muirfield connection is wanted, we should come up with a plan and tell the developer to make it consistent with - that. He said he would like to see a proposed road network from staff and then have the developer respond to it. Mr. Bowman said the proposed application is within acceptable safety limits of local street systems as well as the one access to the arterial and staff recommends approval. He said the City cannot support the Rushwood Drive cul-de-sac. If the property had direct access to an arterial, this could be reconsidered. He feels the width of Rushwood Drive is not a problem to be a part of the local street network. Mr. Kranstuber asked Mr. Cline about the land elevation and the drop-off of 4-6 feet at the end of Rushwood Drive. Mr. Cline said it is a topographical feature. He said those lots are 170-180 feet deep enough to regrade. Mr. Kranstuber asked if the City supports the reduced park acreage for the tradeoff. Ms. Jordan said the Parks and Recreation Committee approved in concept in September. There were concerns about the entry road bisecting the park. We will need to work with the developer on the design. This will be a different application of the' greenspace ordinance which is allowable under the Code. Mr. Kranstuber asked about the deeds and if the residents of the Woods of Dublin could be given some solace on this matter. Mr. Cline said the residents of the Woods of Dublin asked him if he ;t!IM would be willing to put the same deed restrictions on this site as is on the Woods of Dublin land. He said the Woods of Dublin restrictions are minimal and offer no protection to them (1,800 sq. ft. for a ranch and 2,000 sq. ft. for a multi-story). - Their protection comes from the fact that they had a quality developer who exercised architectural control and builder selection during the building process. Mr. Kranstuber asked if there is anything in the deed concerning structures on the property or fences. Mr. Cline said the standard will be included, i.e. no livestock raised on premises, no dumping, satellite dishes, clotheslines. Mr. Edwards said as the density is cut, the park ground will be given but not as proposed here. There will be no privately funded and developed flower garden. Mr. Campbell said the focus should be on what is best for Dublin. Every neighborhood should interrelate with o~her parts of the City. He said one of the main reasons there are congested areas is because there are no other ways for the traffic to fan out through the City. This de~elopment should have more than one . H i ~-tor-~ I B""I ~ 1-0 t Ck... t . C\' P -+ 't. ~1 ~ ~ ~\c..5 11/0 ... , ~"';'-'~" Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, 1991 Page 9 way in and out. He suggested that Rushwood Drive be connected or else have another way i.e., the Muirfield route. Regarding the school overcrowding, he asked that the residents vote for the bond/operating levies because the School Board builds schools. Taking away a few lots or adding/subtracting a few acres from the parkland and taking away the contribution for development of the parkland might not help. He would like to see the developer make an effort to not have the City burdened with the financial obligation of having to develop the park once the land was put there and then to maintain it. The proposal from the developer was that he would build it, provide the initial funding for maintenance and have the development maintain it. There is already a Capital Improvements crunch because of the $16 million sanitary sewer trunk. The park can be built only when the money is available. Does the City want the developed and maintained park or the basic, entry feature park? He emphasized that Rushwood Drive was not destined to dead end into a field forever and it was not guaranteed to be R-' zoning. Alternatives to the traffic issue must be explored by staff. If no alternative is found; Rushwood Drive will be opened. Until the flood way study is complete, it is not known what will happen with the bridge. Also, it should be decided if the lots will be shrunk and if the park will be eliminated. He said because these three issues are undecided, he doesn't feel comfortable voting on this. Mr. Manus said he is concerned with the road issue, and unless an alternative can be found, it should be left as is. He asked what the ratio of density will be without the undeveloped park. Mr. Cline said if the developed park is taken out there will be two acres which can be used. Once density declines, not as much parkland is needed. With less lots, there will be less park which will not be developed. Mr. Manus asked about the FEMA regulations and how they will be impacted by the entryway. Mr. Leffler asked if Brand Road is dedicated to stay the way it is in the Community Plan? Ms. Clarke said Brand Road is a scenic collector, and will stay mostly as it is. The only expected improvements would be to add left turn lanes into subdivisions, to straighten curVes or, to improve the ditch section. It has very steep ditches on either side. Mr. Leffler said less density would be good, provided it's marketable. He asked how much of the parkland's wetlands is developable. Mr. Cline said a wetlands study was conducted on this parkland and wetlands is not an impact on the development. Mr. Geese said part of it is floodplain, not wetlands. Mr. Leffler said he is in favor of tabling this application. Mrs. Stillwell supports tabling this appAcation" also. She said the next 30 days should be used to get answers to these remaining questions. She is also concerned with the density but is not comfortable with the park tradeoff. She \ ~\:5io'j li)r~'S+c \ Cb\- .~ \ ~... 7- ~,~ ""Uo\eS 8110 ,*" Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 10, 1991 Pa ge 10 wants the information on another connector. One access point onto Brand Road is not sufficient. Safety equipment and vehicles must be able to maneuver through the area. She applauded the residents for their hard work in getting information to the Commission. She also thanked the developer for working well with everyone. Mr. Geese is concerned with the possibility of doing Muirfield Drive. Mr. Cline said ~ Ashbaugh Road connects with Muirfield Drive. If the City wants to connect it, they can do a curb cut. Mr. Edwards said he was told he had to connect with Rushwood Drive. Mr. Geese said he doesn't want to see another 30 days to go by ........ with no one taking responsibility for this. Mr. Bowman said he will take the responsibility. Mr. Geese said he is also concerned with the extensive amount of flooding in fringe areas and possible floodways because the FEMA studies are not current. He asked that the City Engineer's office quickly follow-through with the FEMA study. The proposed entranceway on Brand Road will have extensive filling unless it's on pillars. The City should not permit extensive fill, and he asked that the City take responsibility for problems in the flood area. Mr. Mack said the City will do the FEMA study and will make sure the bridge is built according to FEMA and without adverse affect to the drainage. The City will pay the extra money to conduct the study and investigate straightening the stream. The only obstruction to the stream is a downed tree which has been removed. There is no debris or sandbars. Mr. Geese said he doesn't feel a maintenance barn is attractive at the entranceway. Ms. Clarke said specific input is needed regarding the reduction of density. There has been a reduction in density from 208 to 201 units. Mr. Geese asked if Ms. Hess' proposal of 1.8 units is reasonable. Ms. Clarke said the current density is Ifl/!fffl 2.36. Mr. Cline said the numbers will be looked at. With this density they can afford to put another $150,000-$200,000 into the park over what is normally ........ required to do with a dedication. Mr. Edwards said the FEMA studies will not be done in 30 days. He said the contract for the floodwater study was only awarded a week ago. Mr. Mack said the report is due within 60 days. He said the bridge study will be done within 30 days, but a bridge design is needed to do a bridge study. Mr. Mack said he has yet to see a bridge design from Mr. Edwards' consultant. Mr. Edwards said he doesn't think it's feasible to do the engineering for land he is unsure about developing. Mr. Geese asked if the Commission has to take action 90 days from the time of an informal hearing. Mr. Banchefsky said he was unsure but would look into it and send him a letter. tt\~~~ 18r~~:)\c{ Q\. . q \ P"'t""'L n't \'\. v.,~5 4llo IiA ,~ r- l'la'n ~~'~..... ;", ..,.,._~~.",~..,~-'-_.~.-""- Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - October 1 0, 1991 Pa ge 11 Ms. Stillwell made a motion to table this application and Mr. Leffler seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; and Mr. Leffler, yes. (Tabled 7-0.) ,,"" 2. Rezoning Application Z91-007 - Wedgewood South i_ Mr. David Dye, attorney, said he is amenable to tabling until Decemberr long it takes to work out the engineering issues. Mr. Kranstuber asked that feedback be given to the developer from e residents. Mr. Geese said many items have not been taken care of and more 'nformation is needed. Mr. Bowman said he has been talking to the applicant r some time about the property and suggested an informal discussion. T . is an area of Dublin which needs discussion. He said this application is similar Bristol Commons because of the storm runoff. The O'Shaughnessy Hills bdivision has been platted but not developed. The public streets have n er been built. This rezoning will bring all of those problems to the surface. The rocess has been started, and those residents are planning their subdivision's f reo Mr. Manus made a motion to table this appl' ation due to lack of information. Mrs. Stillwell seconded this motion and the vo was as follows: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr effler, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. (Tabled wit fiiscussion 7-0.) The Commission proceeded with the case as an informal item. Ms. Clarke presented slides 0 he site and the staff report. She said the site is wooded, rolling and beautif . There are ravines and dry stream beds running through the site. She sa . most of the dozen houses in O'Shaughnessy Hills subdivision have been uHt by the combination of several lots. Most of the lots are platted 50-60 feet 'fie. There are no sanitary sewers. The proposal is to rezone the site from R-1 the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. O'Shaughnessy Hills was platte during the 1920's. Block #4 is controlled by this developer. It was assume hat there was going to be a sanitary sewer serviced to the site through De ware County. Discussions were underway with the City of Columbus and Dela are County for an amendment to Dublin's sewer contract to permit this. It now ppears that Delaware County is not able to guarantee permanent sanitary sewe service to this site. This site's sanitary service by force main has to be co uted in terms of the northeast qJad sewer for the Homewood and S ottenstein development. The area to the north of Summitview has been . omputed as having a maximum density of six people per acre which translates \ l-ti ~\erj I (),~~s\-o f Dc.-\-. C\ \ P ~ 1- f,\ ~ "\U.~s 101,0 "00- -~,-----,--"'-,----'--- DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 8 3) That the water line be looped in conjunction with t road extension; 4) That all utilities be designed and installed as aQ oved by the City Engineer; 5) That drainage detention for the site me ORPC guidelines and be approved by the City Engineer, incl Ing the pipe enclosure for the ditch section; and ~ 6) That driveway and approac eometrics be approved by the City Engineer, i uding sight distances, and that the site be - limited t two cuts of 30 feet in width at the right-of- way. Mr. Hunter said there w e no problems except for clarification on the last item, which would be the estion of two versus three curb cuts, they are open to going to two curb cuts, ere is a preference to three, and would like to review the plan to see which is etter. Mrs. Still I inquired as to why 349 parking spaces were planned, and B. Clarke indicate that it was slightly over code. d gave unanimous general support to Duke's plan. - 6. Informal - Rezoning Application - Z91-009 - Bristol Commons Ms. Clarke said Bristol Commons has typically been referred to as the "Cook property". She presented slides of the surrounding area. Rushwood Drive and Crawley Drive are to be extended into the site. Ashbaugh Road is a road which .. the City has planned to have vacated for some period of time. Much of this road was vacated when Muirfield was developed but a small portion of this road still exists. This site has very little frontage on Brand Road (less than 200 feet). -- Additional access has always been planned here from the Woods of Dublin and from the Brandon subdivision. The site is not contiguous to Muirfield Drive, and the bridge at Ashbaugh is substandard. The applicant is proposing a subdivision of 208 single-family houses and is requesting to rezone the property from R-1 (single- family acre lot classification) to PLR, Planned Low-Density Residential District. The gross density of the site is 2.37 units per acre. The formal application has been filed to rezone the property. The first reading will be at Council on September 9, 1991. This is an infill project and has neighbors on all sides. The developer is looking for several things: The approval of approximately 200 lots which are j:80 feet in width and an alternate to the us:ual Code stipulated park dedication. The park dedication, given the acreage and the number of units, by Code, is 13.14 acres. The developer proposes to dedicate some 9.5 acres and to make up the \ fh~~/8r~~-k1 ~e~.c\ \ P.... z..m'\Y..~., if, .'- pf '-...'""'"""~~"'-'"-~~~"-'~:...-~--.", , DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 9 shortfall by park development. A schematic plan has been submitted. The stormwater detention will be on the north side of the stream within the "park" area. The entire floodway is contained within the park and will not touch any of the lots. There are seven lots on that subdivision which show some floodplain. It is possible to fill those lots above the flood hazard level and to develop them. One request, which is peculiar, is to permit a 30-foot driveway. Staff requests to see some design justification for this. Additionally, Staff requests: 1 ) There is a concern about the internal collector system and staff would like to see the main road upgraded to a 60-foot right-of-way. 2) There is a sanitary sewer, soon to be under construction, to replace the Ashbaugh lift station which services property in lower Muirfield. An easement is needed on the lift station. 3) The developer will dedicate right-of-way consistent with the Community Plan and assist with the City's plan to vacate Ashbaugh Road and remove the bridge. 4) Staff recommends that a FEMA floodway study be performed on the proposed bridge structure for the new entrance into the subdivision and the flood areas be accurately shown on all documents. 5) A wetlands evaluation should be performed on the site. 6) Drainage detention should comply with. MORPC guidelines and any detention facility to be located in the park should be approved by the Parks Director. 7) The park acreage issue should be resolved with the approval of both the Parks Director and the Parks and Recreation Committee. 8) The roadway drainage along Brand Road should be maintained and if improved, as approved by the City Engineer. 9) All utilities and new streets in this section be designed and installed as approved by the City Engineer. 10) It is anticipated that the d~veloperof this site will share in the cost of the sewer line. There may be a special assessment or some other measure such as special tap fee. From staff's perspective, a single- \ ft;sbr-j I f;ri~-tc ( S"'f' q \ P-t L M ~ \'\v..-4s 0" 211 - I DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 10 family use is the only use permissible on this site. It is surrounded on all sides by already developed property. Staff desires to see streets extended into this site from the Woods of Dublin and Brandon for the enhancement of access. Staff expects there to be neighborhood opposition on this issue. -- Mr. Mack referred to Item #4 of the staff report regarding the FEMA study and said this is a source of concern. Staff recommends that the FEMA study be completed - by the developer. The scope of the study should include areas both upstream and downstream on Indian Run to see what can be done to mitigate the stormwater condition at that site. The additional work will be done at the City's expense. Chris Cline, attorney, said single-family is the only land use which was considered. Brandon is the most dominant land use influence on their development with the access to the south. The smallest lots have 80-foot front footage. They could be platted as an R-3 subdivision. The homes will range in price from $180,000 - $300,000. He said the proposed developed park is 9.5 acres, not 13.5 acres as stated by the staff. A FEMA study will be conducted soon. He said the retention pond across Brand road which is a contributing factor to the high water situation and has been a problem, is not on their site and is not their responsibility. He said he is agreeable to having Rushwood Drive closed off or to extend it through their development... either way is fine with them. He referred to the nine staff conditions and said they have no major problems with any of them'. He said there is no problem with the easement for the sanitary sewer. He asked what to what documents Condition #4 is referring. He suggested changing the word "documents" to "engineering documents". If/I Mr. Pete Edwards, Edwards Land Company, said he would like to cooperate with the neighbors to try to solve the flooding problems. He said is able to give the ..... 13.5-acre park if it is needed. He would prefer to take the 9.5 acres in the front to build a flower garden and use the civic association dues to maintain it. This proposed flower garden will make the quality of life nicer, help the lots sell faster, as well as beautify the area. Many plants and flower bulbs will be used, there will be stone accents and also a lake. Wells would be drilled and a sprinkling system would be installed. The barn on the site would be refurbished and donated to the City. He said an effort was made to make road a less desirable road to travel by not making it straight or wider. Keith Myers, landscape architect, said \he 4..acre entry is bordered by Indian Run on the north and a stand of existing mature trees. The proposed concept is to bring the entrance road through the four acres and create a small entry pond. This \ ~ s\ct'~ /6r ~+o ( . ~ ~ I P+ z. W\.~~-ks ep... :31, .... - , DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 11 pond is strictly an aesthetic issue and is not needed for stormwater. Daylilies, grasses, and various forms of aquatic material will be used around the pond. Entering the entrance way, there would be a more formal garden. Around the outside of the property there would be a small gravel road for parking. In the areas cn'1~, bordering the edges of the wooded lot, there will be a large variety of flowering bulbs. An evergreen tree screen will be used along the southern property line. Development costs for these parks average $25,000 - $30,000 an acre. ,,- Richard Coulter, resident of 6100 Brand Road (west side of Ashbaugh Road) said he is opposed to the removal of Ashbaugh Road because it is his access to the northern part of his property. Personally he believes the entrance as planned will make it dangerous. Joe Hardin, resident of 5799 Rushwood Drive, abutting the site, was surprised that a subdivision of this character was being proposed. The average lot size is 0.71 acres in Woods of Dublin. River Forest is even less dense. This project is 2.44 homes per acre. He would like to see the same density as the existing development in the neighborhood, if impossible make Rushwood a cui de sac. Bill Knauf, resident of 5533 Ashford Road, River Forest, agreed with Mr. Hardin's statement regarding density. He requested that the unique characteristics of River Forest be protected. George Gianakopoulos, resident of River Forest, wishes to maintain the quality of the lots by perhaps providing mounds to divide the old neighborhood from the development and the associated landscaping be the 'responsibility of the developer. Chris Hess, resident of 5802 Rushwood Drive, agreed with Mr. Hardin about the density. A neighborhood meeting was held in her home to help inform the residents. She has measured area cui de sacs that are just as long as hers. Rushwood Drive measures 25 feet wide. She suggested that a traffic flow study be done prior to development. She is not against the development itself. Mrs. Hess said the school population increase with 208 new homes, by 100 elementary students, 35 in middle school, and 35 in the high school. She urged the Commission to ease into the growth so we can ease into the schools so that services can be maintained. She inquired of Mr. Edwards how he can insure that the cost of the homes will be from $180,000 to $ 280,000 price range. Jim Everhart, resident of 5806 Rushw~od Drive, and his house borders the proposed development. He supports everything brought up by the other residents. Mr. Everhart raised issues about the density of the neighborhood and the water \ ~ ~-\or~ (f)ri~+Cl , Sep. ~ \ P"tL m:~~~ 4-\7 ,.- -----~~~~*--~--~-"----~ , DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 12 and sewer services. Mark Tuttle, resident of 5549 Ashford, agreed with his fellow neighbors regarding density and additional traffic. He feels the road should not be widened. Whatever happens to this development will set a precendent for the rest of the S.R.745 area. ~ Vince Lodico, President of Woods of Dublin Homeowners Association, had a meeting. There was a general feeling of concern about density and traffic. He ~)- requested that a traffic study of the area north be made. Bill Antonelli, resident of 7876 Devonwood, Woods of Dublin, addressed the density issue as a "lose-lose" situation for the City of Dublin by cutting both the lot size and park space down. He feels all parks are crowded. When he bought his property, one acre lots were proposed for the area. Lee Vermer, resident of 6001 Brand Road, proposed that no roadways to the property be closed. Suggested that at least three accesses be made into the development. Joel Campbell was in favor less parkland with maintenance fund, as opposed to holding the developer responsible for the greens pace only. City maintenance and development costs should be considered when accepting parkland. He stated that he is concerned to some extent in terms of the numbers involved in this development. He feels the density should be reduced in some way. As for as the road situation, he doesn't want a big thoroughfare to cut through to S.R. 745. IlIA Mr. Kranstuber agreed with Mr. Campbell. He also was concerned about the density. ...... Mr. Pete Edwards, said Bob Webb questioned what taking a street through the Webb Development meant. The flood plain, density and parks will be indicated on the plat Mr. Fishman was in favor of getting as much land as possible, but he is willing to take 9 acres of finished park. Mr. Kranstuber agreed with Mr. Campbell also regarding the parks. Janet Jordan said this concept will be r.eviewed at the next Parks and Recreation Meeting. i{.\.j{orJ 18d5-to ( 'Set'. 9 l PT Z t'V1: l'I. u..-ks '51-, ,t!I , .."~'"_'",,c,.--,,~~,,'u,.~~~,~""-'p.~~_=,, ._,- ~ ",-- f .. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 13 Mr. Kranstuber agreed with the park concept, and stated that he had major problems with the density issue. He questioned the usage of the flood plain in the park. ,~ Mr. Geese supported contacting Mr. Bob Webb and the Muirfield Tournament Coordinators regarding parking lots. Lots #2,15,26,27,18, 34 and 203 are not -' buildable because of the stream. He does not agree to keeping the barn for a maintenance garage but does support it if used as a character definition for the development. In regards to parkland, the Woods of Dublin has a very neat piece of property which is 14 acres which needs to be maintained. He suggested that the curb be softened for safety reasons. He challenged the engineering staff to solve the flooding problem. On February 11, 1991, and June 14, 1989 Brand Road was closed because the stream flooded over Brand Road. We have an obligation of health and safety to all citizens here. Mr. Manus was pleased to see Mr. Edwards at the meeting and felt it indicated his commitment to putting in a quality development. Mr. Manus also was concerned with the density and with the traffic. He felt smaller park should come to the City fully developed and usable. The barn should not be as a working maintenance facility. Mrs. Stillwell specifically said that she is concerned with the density. She inquired if there were wetlands on site. She was told no. Rushwood Street should not be closed off to allow access for safety. Mrs. Stillwell stated that she would accept a 9 acre fully developed park with the bonds for maintenance improvement. Mr. Kranstuber said that the engineers had some challenges as far as roadways, flood plain areas, etc. He asked if Parks really needed the barn. Janet Jordan stated that the barn was needed and that it would be made to look better. Mr. Edwards proposed that the barn be redone by stripping and staining, adding barn windows and a new roof. He is willing to work with the Parks Department. He said the density can be reduced if necessary after reviewing the surrounding area. Traffic flow was discussed in detail by Mr. Edwards projecting up to twenty years in the future. \ - Mr. Kranstuber appreciated all of Mr. Edwards comments, but still felt density was a major problem. A-\skrJ I 5r"+o ( \ S€.t' . '\ I Pi- Z \Y\:~~~ ,- b1l - .. " DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 5, 1991 PAGE 14 Mr. Geese inquired if residents at the meeting would get notice of future actions on this development. Bobbie Clarke stated that all residents will get one at the next scheduled Planning and Zoning Meeting, October 10, 1991. She requested addresses of any residents who do not receive the last notice so that they could be added to the list. ......... Mr. Geese stated that the Board's obligation was to act in 90 days. ~ The Board recessed. 7. Informal - Revision of Preliminary Plan - Starkey - Coffman Ms. Clarke said the tracts were rezoned in 1990 to the PUD, Pia ed Unit Development District for a combination of multi-family (112 u . s) and single-family (42 lots) housing. The multi-family developer is no longer i erested. Scioto Valley Land Company is interested in the land for single- mily purposes only. When the ground was zoned it was two parcels (over o acres owned by the Starkeys and 1.7 acres on Coffman Road owned b he Sunderlands). Currently, their company has a contract on the Starkey Ian , and there is no disposition for the 1.7 acres. If the old plan is altered, the z Ing will have to revert to its previous classification. Mr. Mack asked that item #2 of the fol wing staff recommendations be removed: He said there is no viable way for thO to happen. 1 ) That drainage dete Ion for the site meet MORPC guidelines and be JfIII!!io' approved by the Ity Engineer; that the Parks Director approve any stormwater fac' Ity to be located in the park, and that the unusual drainage con tions be fully considered in the design; ~, 2) That the e rance for this development should line up with the existing i ersection on Coffman Road, if possible; 3) That a ropriate mechanism for maintaining roadway drainage along Coff an Road shall be designed and constructed as approved by the Cit Engineer; 4) 1: at flood hazard areas be accurately shown on all appropriate C1rawings and documents; That street intersection, approach geometrics, and sight distances be designed and constructed as approved by the City Engineer; That the access to the pa(,k be approved by the Parks Director; That Washington Township Fire Department approve the site layout; lts-k'j {Brl,sk ( ~,p. q l P* 7- fY\: VI.~\e.s 1\1 - - . -- - - - t - "'," - - I I Z Z _ ;: '"'" OlO;? - ~17l L 'P~"7) > > CJ L 0"' t. 4: 4: a r- -.s .. II II 'V &lDl Old} M~it ~b-ll-H G~ l,({;v OIHU '- r;,ngWfl/OJ ~ Q! ~ eJ 0 ~ ~ u ~ aN-'Ql}f~\fd 'J'tj :{:17"ZJ ~ ~lD 1 O~ I M011 ~b-l1l-01 .l~1~ ~r\lv:d:1 Hl{)O'J OO~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ,,~ ~ is 0 ... . aN~l~'z!tfd 'Jtf17t7'OJ -SlOl Sb~ M9~ Us-'?I-m 6S8p-69t (tl9) :XVJ ^NV~WOJ GN\il'Jn":{\iJV\O-3 N .0- :3 ~ C5 ~ ~ W , 1" ~(t3QN::J.LX-3 ~\~a OOOMH~n~ .... S107 ~OD Mq,~ J~.b ~06p-69t (t 19) :3NOHd ~ ~ o::::r CJ <( Q: en m ~ . QNV;Jllt\1d '")V fJf:j'0I ro/ SlOl lOb M.0~ HrH-b _ . - I... ' a.. a.. 0 UJ Z W ~ ~ ~ ;;: -", an.-ntVVd 'JtI Zg'Z} rv ca10llOZ ""'~ ~~-JZ-g ~lZ~t OIHO Sn8!'tn10~ OlfiO Nll1jnO ^' S:3ZfJ'1 uyf:t.Z ldlrl ~ Al'tl.JdOZld '>100) :r > ~ ~ ci 0:: ~~ Z _ u:nl.1s l.NOHJ .0S OO~' ., ~ Z a.. e5 8 ffi - .. . ~ .., NOI.LdIHJSaG A8 31'10 NOISIAIO 11AIJ . S NUl !'WO J l J c, I Lfn ~ ~ ~ UJ!:j W u.. a: : :~, SNOiSIA8H .::>NI DNIH:i:iNIDN:i :i-},( V'I V - u u Y1 C C j ~ '< '=;! ~ a.. ;.11.. ,.llf: V1 ....., 0 V1 , . ..... , 'i <' . . ~ l=:-') :2 1 , :::J ~ :::i I '. - N " . ::2 ~ ffi a:::l i I - - :::::) ~ ~~ =t.OO~ __ C' ~ - u... Q : _ "-A.D:z 0 . I '2 @ <2: ~_,,,, I II r0 .n C, ~ -, ~ ~. . >' I ~ ~ ~-' C3 :'~ , -9 - 7 g; : ~ ~ fL,JL ~ . ('0 I ...;..0 \ "\ ,I 0 l'\1 j:..L :2 /"V .-.--J -3 ~ I --:- -d- I-- -::r:: ~ \ \ .-:--- (_ ~ Lf'l t:C r-'1-- - . 1 r ..- , ~ I L '- --' ~ <'v \ --.., , .- /' ~ . " \- ,5 I :.+ '" \ .--~ . -,,' '- ~ <;;j- , ... - '""'-- . '. \.S1 ~ I L~ / .) /V / L -=- L--I '( ,. l.lJ U' I .::;, , . /" < __ ~ ,..--_ , , I" ...... ~ '-- I ,-' - . C ~ C. LD, ............/ v (, / I \ ---1 ........ ,- Lf'> "/ "- ~ 1.5 ,-, 1- ,'7: f lJ r- ~ Lf'1 UI ,,- IS' ~ cO ~ - - " ~r:f. r0 ~ ~ ll.J ~ > ~ - I _ L0 ' t:i I < N - ~ _ _~ ~ r(" c::> - 'I' ~ .J l. .J ,- -- ~ ~ 1 ___ ~ I .. " . t.!' ~ .. f- . .... ___ I ; - ~ "-- --' .......... ~ J) _ ~ ~ 0 I' . __ __ , ~ - - v . . I. 0 _ 1'(""1 UI ~_' - -..- [:(w - a ~ - ~ 05 r-C'" L1J t!: I:S:::J c:( D.. l'('l - U" c:--J - -d- ~ IlJ ~ c:::;t e:( t:C ~ - ~ O:J r- <I ~ ~ If'l ~ ~I LS'l 8 Lt'I ~ ~ d:) s: t.L 2 ~o-~ ~ - ~ < .' ~I .n ~ - _-c -r;---= ,- ~. v -J - ,-. - cS:l r--I " ~ ,.,.. , f'('l --- ~ q '-J - _J ., c(J ~ __ r:C ~l (j1 (5"' _ ~ t---- c.... j ..L I r('l _ r::;;-..J ~ '-J.-.JI t.l " c;- l::::t! L..lJ <r: '-J ;, ) cd- - -J ~ (.'-'1 c:(~_ ~ 0' 4J - ,-Sc IS' c::-J lOr<" -J . () :: c() I ~ 2: ~ 0 \ \ N ~ - 0 <(I d) c() is \ ~ ~ <t ~ --.J -- . .... CJ n - I lLJ N-.... '-/ )(,1. __ ~ \ :::t "- -'- &.rl ...... I d:) ~ ~ t!.. t-J Lf'I \0." a iSl l1r- ~l CJ 0 . t() r -- I ~ ~ -D... 00 0- r-- CJ"" 0 a 9 ~ ~! J ~ ...s f - o ~ ~ ~ 2 6) c:Cl :: - ~ ~ ~ v ..s ~ ~ LS1 r-:: .q. - ~ ~ - ~ ~ D... a --- -- ,- - ( o I ~ tG t5"" I cO r"" (() ~ ItS'::: ~ ~ . ~ ~ - I cd- N -/ - ~ ! ~ ~ -: "- . (5'" , -- I r--- r- I 0 0 ;;;/ (!'" -~ \\ / I 0 c:-.J - ..s _ 5" -- - I - . __ .roo. ' ".~ ~'! ~ .. \ ~ - I {;::;~ _ c:() . - ' I . r- __ ~ ~\<r- ~ - . "'-~ ~ ~-"'~'--' t.""" ,- I J ,~. \ o . C \ . . -, ,'" \ -Sl ' - . _..- - c:d 4 I \ ~ (1 ,~\ ~ - ~~ r- \ c-J ' -- ~ rr ~ r- ~ r- \ \ ' ._ -- ,.t ..l't- , ~ c:!- r- \ \ - ~ r- \ \ ~ I .. r- I ~ l1' ~...S) I "" I . i I U"l - ~ 'If'' ~ r-- ...1. I - ~ , ~ ~ I : - w I ~ ~ ~ I <t: l I I I..Sl . ::2. I I ,dJ '- t::C '. 'LD ~ ~ ~ I a \ rC'1 ...s t- r<:"l l-\'...9 c: I d- . . , --t <d r-: -.s J . ~ r- (I ) N ~' , ~ \ / ~ ~ r- - - - r- " , <, - ~ ) - ~ I - "" I l!"' - \ ' , I cO "- ~: o::::t _ c{) C -- -- - - I !::::' r - - I ./ I ...,S,) I ~ ~- 4 ) ~ ' I I.C'1 t ~ ~ ~ . ~ l C5"' 1 <:::j- I - ! r"" '. c:::t ~ ,~~ '.... -.:- /) i t , . , I . 'i, cr-- I I " ~ . Nfl ~ . , ) c:..J r('l L0 \ - o ........ a - ~ ...\ \ ..- I q .q. J I t..0 lS"' I.S'" 1- ~~ \'V t- ~-- .....-.....- """ol9': . I l . .---.l- ~,...-/ O I ~ _.-/ \ " c(] (.... , \ C -.J N I .-' ~."".." ~. L\J I- -,. - - . -- --. ,-- - -, - -~ -, · ( ~ '-'- ~) ,~ ~ ,\\ ~~ ' ~<. ~ I \ - -~ / \\ - - '~ :::J ~ - I I ~/'" ,--'" . .~., ". _/ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ .'. ~ 1;;::J ~ \ 'v'(' / . " / t\~, , "'. "_ 'l' ",.,.,.. , ,~<.~,,~ I .(. < / / ~ -- - - - - - - - -. - - - .... / I --., r' )' /' /.' .' ,_ _ ...... .--,..._ . "\., / / r.- /', / ,~ /" ~' / ~., ( <'^' ~. ~- ? ..."':-;' " \ / :i'" ~ /' " , . '- ,..... .~_A....... . - '- ,...r- \! ' r ..-> , ~ _ ;: :J . I! . f\' '\ . \ ' . \'-/ ) L(1 I I I .... ~ l ~ )\~ , ~ J ~ I r- c:Cl 0- ~ \. / \C>V /" , (-^ ". .' \ , ~ ~ I ~ - , .' ' '\, , "v '~/ v: " ..' . , I r \ :t:~' " I/"' ' . . '. ~ ... '- ............ -_ I ---" _...-/ /" ~ . \-~ -- ./ \ / \,\ ~"".~.... - _____ - ---::./ \~' _, ' ~ I ~.,. . "- I / ...,.' ~ I I I - / . ,), LC'l I ... / )t..; $) 6' a::J r- .s \ , I -lr: ' I "~ .. I \ \ 1 " ! \ l ll.. _,' ,~ t / \.... . '6:." t \ I I r ... ~. "" ~ J,., '~~.-' ~-: :'... ~ I V , I ',,- 'f ~~ · '.' I :b~ --' ......., ' ...l ' .:~ ,...'" I ...... --r . ' ..... .,1, ..' ~.. _ . ~ _ _ _" _ _ -~-r. ."" .-"'-_ --;:--. - -;.~ _ '".~. -::._ ; _-:;- .~ " __________, _\ -1...... ~ (- 1-- -- / I \ ~ ... -II ~ .... ........--..........-v- _."". - ....'.,., . - · ,,~..... I . .. ^---" I \ ~ ir. '11'- t~ ~ _ .. .... _ ~ ._......... -,-.-. . -"--- ' - -"". ~---....-~ -- - .-r~~"X ...' I ...)l... , I I () - \ ILJ 1'/':;;: \ I- \ LL~I / /' / " :t " ~ ~~J----\------------- ::IN -=1219, /C!l-:Jlj~lnV- ,~ Lu - . ______- '\ ,------- ~OdD~d f..--- -~;--;: " . . .~ ) I "" (~ . \ ()J ~', ~", . \ \ r \ - I . ~ I I I . I I . . I . I . - ="""= ~ - . - '=' -...-".,' t -- _ __ __ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii.liiiiiiiiiiiii ..iiiiiiiiiiiio ~