The URL can be used to link to this page

018-93 Ordinance AMENDED ____u. __~~ r RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co, Form No, 30043 I ! Ordinance No. ~1cll-~'L- ~1\IIENDED Passed nn ~..m mmmm m~n nn19~ n . I r \ lii, '-' AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING OF 9.99 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS OF MUIRFIELD DRIVE AND DUBLINSHIRE DRIVE TO BE REZONED FROM: R-l, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO: PLR, PLANNED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINEQ by the Council of the City of Dublin, state of Ohio, tIl of the elected members . concurring: I I section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the city of II Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, and shall be subject to I regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin zoning Code and amendments thereto. section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list r- of contiguous and affected property owners, and the , recommendations of the Planning and zoning Commission, Exhibit ~ "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. II section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. II II Passed this ,;( / 5--t day of r- ' 1993. II~pre~~ I Attest: I I ~ C!..- ~ Ii Clerk of Council II Sponsor: Planning Division II .~ Ii , , II t II I hereby certify that copies of this Ordinance!R&-.OhJtiDn were posted in the ........ I! City of Dublin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the OtIio Revised Code. I ~~~ Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio I I I I ~.., !l.''".~.'...,_r:l!ifl1!_'I1>''''''l'1'"'''''''"'''''''~_~'''''''''_''''~~'_-' _1 14A'1lJ .~ , 1-,-- i~ .... Q)'" ~... cs~ ~lt: ~(:) ~\o lj ~~t~ ~U' ",. ~ 10.; .. ... " ' ,'- l! 11 ~ 1" . I" .... \l,J9' J' ~ ~ Sc ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ .. ~~ ~ ~ :. " <l .. .. l:! .. <:i ;..- - ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ .. ~ r ~- ~ ~~ ~ >< ." ~" - l:, .. '/ '" W. ~ ../// i~~ ~ ~ ~// ~"18- 2~~ ~iJP/ .. __ ~ ~_~._/'- i" -- ---- -- ----.~ ~ _---- l''' 0' k . . -'- DOl ,,0 ,-,\ , 0" ... ~ " c ~\t . \ 1 ~ ll'~ Q" \0 11 '\) ~'<J '(\0 o~ .... \ ~ ~ ~Ol ~~ ....~ \\j ~~ Q:(:) ~ ~ ~ I"" @ ....---- - I ~~/ ....... ' C v . _ . 'l..\dl"':) .... SJ Okl.~. . Sl<-"r- @ . s",rt [J)v\'\ \(\ : ~ l8 ~~~ . ~Q: 0 ,~~~ . Z {3 W N -J ~ ~ > ~ en - ..-- ::> W ~ 0 () C\2 U. '-' 0 ww>- a:C1!::: o . ,__~..,".,,_.~,..,_.,.'~. ""'."'o"'_~'_.'_"''''''''""'_--=-_.~_ --~- . llYeilD.' "$" , ! .~' w Z ",""" ~ >- ~I~ ::ll~ ~~ a...J _CD Z::l ::lO o~ :::0 'lj;a:: Loco. tion Mo.R. Not to Scale ~. . "Si4e, l~~ """ -~- , Ohla Holding Corparatlan / . , e ~ 1 29 ~ ~ , DUbllnN I I 135,00 I \ ..I .. 30 t-' ot' ...- t-' 1 g " / g I .. f .. '35.00 21 ~ I 135'~ .. 1 P ~ 6 1 g 1 ..I e 137.44 ... '35,00 \ !A\ 31 8 .. I '" g , I ." 1.. '" I g .. I "'I 9 .. ~ IP 135.00 I a "! I 20 I'" 8, ~ 5 0 '--'Z~ ~ ~ I 18 \ 135.00 10 I '35,00 <:II 32 14..58 .. I \ ..\ '" 8\ " I \ ,< .. '.l: I.. \ HUS PO 0 !" 1 10 Ig b ~ 0 I~ -4 I ... - I 19 8, ; 1.0 .; I 0 1 "'~ 1 '35,00 135.00 33 " 1<5,53 1 0 I '" {~ n I.. ..\ 't~ 1 Cj ;:1 " .. \ 11 \ \ "'I 3 1 8 ~l !" 1 18 I'" 81 ; 0 1 "'I 8 I 10 135,00 135,00 '49.32 .. i .. I 1 ~ \ ~ I .. I 12 ~ 1 17 I ~ ~ I .. ., N 3-4 '3~.92 0 35 ~ " 135,00 I o I 35 0 :::/ 0 139.29 " I ~I ... '8 135,00 55 50 1! I 0 gl I'" 37 8 ; 135.00 .;1 " ~I ~ '35,08 ~ 54 135,00 .. Cj I .; 8' 51 .. 38 8 g I .. .;1 " 1 .. ~I ... -Z~ 131,91 .. 53 135,00 {L-l 52 39 N .. ,"",,~ Dubllnshlre Sec. -4 ----- ------ - ~~'\ll~--- - - too 'lR Flaod LImits I I Pt"Cf~~~ I - I Dubllnshlre Sec. 5 PUb ~ 1'-1 ~fL~ ".... .- r ~.- .('ll. , ..._._"-~.~-............_~ .. r===; r=O c.D CfJ ~ ~ PROPERTY OWNERSHIP 0 Dunmere Associates - 9.89 Acres · r--4 Presently Zoned PUD · r===i 4-J Holding Corporation of Ohio - 10.00 Acres ' r 1 v Total - 19,89 Acres ,.Q <D CJ) DEVELOPMENT DATA Lot Usage = Single Family Residential ~ ~, Minimum Lot Size = 9300 sf Minimum Lot Width = 70' at Bldg Line Q Total Site' Acreage = 19.8954 Total # of Lots = 56 Lots/ Acre = 2.81 REQUIRED PARK SP ACE CALCULATION Total Area = 19.89 Acres Less Previous Zoned = 9.89 Acres 10.00 x 0.02 = 0.20 Acres Total # of Lots = 56 Scale: 1" = 100' Less Previous Zoned = 29 27 x 0.055 = 1.48 Acres Date: 12-29-92 Required Space = 1.68 Acres Revisions: Provided = 1.13 Acres ~ <'i.~ Excess Section 5 = 0.68 Acres Excess Earlington Village = 1.60 Acres ~ Net = 3.41 Acres - Required Park Space = 1.68 Acres Excess Park Space = 1.73 Acres CEA PP228S61 1] OF 4J RECEIVED JAN 0 4 1993 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF DUBUN PLAN S;4e/tkrL ~ - ~'."""-"'-'-~'-'-'~~~~ i2-~2-1992 14:11 1 614 487 096 P.05/07 , .. at t;:. ~t'" & fT ^ -~ c.. 'o-E- ~ .- B ~, CIVIL ENGINEERING I 1400 We.t fifth Avenue Columbua. Ohio 43212 ASSOCIATESI Tel 614.487.1888 IJ __ fax 614.487.0964 ZONING DESCRIPTION ~ o. 't ~ ~ a.e ,~ ~~. ./ ".84 .'-" Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Surve~ 3010 and being 20.978 acres of land out of the following traCts of land: 0.666 acres of land as conveyed to Dunmcre Associates A Limited Partnership of record in ORV2037102. 9.231 acres out of an original 17.1S2 acre traCt as conveyed to Dunmere Associates A Limited Pannership and 11.081 acres out of an original 54.083 acre tract as conveyed to Holding Corporation of Ohio of record in ORVI4447G19 (all deed references refer to the records of the recorders office Franklin County, Ohio) said 20.978 acres described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly comer of Tumbury Section I of record Plat Book 68. page 23, and the southwesterly comer of Dublinshirc Drive as the same is shown of record in Plat Book 67, Page 85; Thence South 03024'50" West a distance of 734.13 feet to a point at the southeasterly comer of said 54.083 acre tract; Thence South 74044'39" West with the southerly line of said 54.083 acre tract a distance of 637.23 feet to a point on a curve in the easterly right-of-way line of Muirfield Drive; Thence with said easterly right-of-way line the following three courses: .-.. f 1) With a curve to the left having a central angle of 14006'48" a radius of 1610.00 '-" feet of which whose chord bears North 03047'29" West a chord distance of 395.58 feet to a point of tangency; 2) North 10050'53" West a distance of 253.43 feet to a point of curvature; 3) With a curve to the right having a central angle of 22037' 14" a radius of 1800.00 feet of which whose chord bears North 00027'44" East a chord distance of706.04 feet to a point in the northerly line of said 17.152 acre tract; Thence North 72015'40" East with said northerly line a distance of 585.35 feet to the northeasterly comer of said. 17.152 acre tract; Thence South 17044'21" East with the easterly line of said 17.152 acre traCt a distance of 60.00 feet to a comer of said 0.666 acre traCt; Thence with the easterly line of said 0.666 acre traCt the following three courses: 1) South 23001 '50" a distance of 150.74 feet to a point; r 2) South 00006'40" East a distance of 267.50 feet to a point; \...- 3) South 29047'45" East a distance of 127.71 feet to a point on a curve in the nonherly right-of-way line of Dublinshire Drive as shown in Plat Book 76, Page 64; Thence with said nonherly right-of-way line with a curve to the left having a central angle of 10030.05" a radius of 710.00 feet to which whose chord bears South 53032'20" West a chord distance of 129.95 feet to a point at the northwesterly comer of said existing Dublinshire Drive; Page 1 of 3 , . '12-22-1992 14: 12 1 614 487 096 _.. P. 06/07 t. "-tft Q rr .t~ , P ~ " of .3 rJ r i' CIVIL ENGINEERING I ~:~~ f'lfth Avenue I Columbu.. Ohio 43212 I I ~ r ASS 0 C I ATE S I Tel &14.487.1888 ..::....J ,-' _I f'ox 614.487.0964 Thence North 73017'36" East with the westerly line of said Dublinshire Drive a distance of. r- 138.57 feet to a point; ~ Thence South 03024'5011 West continuing with the westerly line of said existing Dublinshire " Drive a distance of 16.30 feet to the point of beginning and containing 20.918 acres of land more J,->-- ~ or less. _Exce~ting there from:= an 1.~~~~ said 1.082 acreLl'aCt being the proposed Dublinshire Drive extcnS10n ana aescribCCl as follows: Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey 3010 and being 1.082 acres out of an original 54.083 acre traCt as conveyed to Holding Corporation of Ohio of record in ORVI4447GI9 (all deed reference refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio) and described as follows: Beginning at the northwesterly comer of Turnbury Section I of record in Plat Book 68, Page 23, and at the southwesterly comer of Dublinshirc Drive as the same is shown of record in Plat Book 67, Page 85; Thence aclOSS said 54.083 acre tract the following four courses: 1) With a curve to the left having a central angle of 17056'33" a radius of 650.00 feet of which whose chord bears South 49025' 19" West a chord distance of 202,72 feet to a point of reverse curvature; ''''~>, I 2) With a curve to the right having a central angle of 38042'05" a radius of 830.00 '''-'" feet of which whose chord bears South 59048'05" West a chord distance of 550.04 feet to a point of tangency; 3) South 79009'0711 West a distance of 36.90 feet to a point of curvature; 4) With a curve to the left having a central angle of 90000'00" a radius 'of 35.00 feet of which whose chord bears South 34009'07" West a chord distance of 49.50 feet to a point in the easterly right-of-way line of Muirfield Drive; Thence Nonh 1005O'S311 West with said easterly right-of-way line a distance of 130.00 feet to a point; Thence &ClOSS said 54.093 acre tract the following four courses: 1) With a curve to the left having a central angle of 90000'00" a radius of 35.00 feet of which whose chord bears south 55050'53" East a chord distance of 49.50 feet to a point of tangency; 2) Nonh 79009'07" East a distance of 36.90 feet to a point of curvature; ,-.. 3) With a curve to the left having a central angle of 38042'05" a radius of 770.00 '-' feet of which whose chord bears Nonh 59048'05" East a chord distance of 510.28 feet to a point reverse of curvature; 4) With a curve to the right having a central angle of 07050'15" a radius of 710.00 feet of which whose chord bears North 44022'10" East, a chord distance of 97,05 feet to the northwesterly comer of the right-of-way of said existing Dublinshire Drive as shown in Plat Book 76, Page 64; Page 2 of 3 ~ . 12-;;2-1992 14: 13 1 614 487 096 ilC. H' 8'f "A II P.07/07 . p~ 3 oi ..J . B ~ " CIVIL ENGINEERING I 1400 We.t FIfth Avenue Columbu.. Ohio 43212 ASSOCIATESI Tel 614.487.1888 ,J_I F"ax 614.487.0964 Thence Nonh 73017'36" East with the westerly line of said Dublinshirc Drive a distance of r- 138.57 feet to a point; '-- Thence South 03024 'SO" West with the westerly line of said existing Dublinshire Drive a distance of 16.30 feet to the point of beginning and containing 1.082 acres of land more or less. This description was prepared by Ovil Engineering Associates, Inc., Columbus, Ohio from existing records. For zoninl purposes only. Prepared: December 21, 1992 \ D\Ji~tlle(t f1 ~s c) C" Ct t-e s Acrea5e_ , Cf, SCl ---; ct c _ - of Ohlu 11 c (f c. cJ e q. l~ q C Ae+ Ho1dl0c) (urplfiJ,O>J Gte ~ of b0bllfls,h,[c Or. e x It (1 <, (I.; 11 f?O, Lc!, ') r I ;" '- r-- '- Page 3 of 3 ~_.,.__,_,.~_,.._.__.._.v_'~,_.....>..v , "\ CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING'AND ZONING COMMISSION -, .rvc. AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only OF TilE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No: DISTRICT MAP ZM ?- '13 - ex> Z-- (Reclassification of Land) Date Filed: 12./30 I q z- Fee Receipt No. I .'~ L v/~/L _,~..,./: ..' i ;: i:_:~'~' Received by: ~ -"I '!..~" _ ;/"";;.,,,' .. /' / . ",' ,.,,( Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant Dunmere Associates, A Limited Partnership Rnd Holdine r.orpor~rion of Ohio (Have property in contract) being the owner(s),/lessee(s) of property located within the area proposed for Reclassification of land * , requests that th~ followi described land to be placed in the Planned Low Density ResidentiRl DiRrrirr . A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED 1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following): .. a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) , .,.. '" , i a recorded plat, with an area of . ~ b. Beginning at a point along (street or other) and being feet in a N S E direction from the (specify) of (Street or other), and thence having a dimens of from the (specify) of (street or other), and having an area of . ) c. The tract of land containing Acres and bounded by: -., . i (specify) on the N SEW (Circle) :. (specify) on the N SEW (Circle) \ ... it . ..). i (specify) on the N SEW (Circle) 1 ~ ,."......... (specify) on the N SEW (Circle) , \, ~ d. Attached ,,_al descrtrtion: YES X. NO * Please note that the proposed use for the property owned by Dunmere Associates conforms t~ the existing zoning under the Earlington Preliminary Developm~nt plan and therefore this application could be considered a request for final development ~v;r~o[)al of the Dunmere Associates parcel. ~ Page 1 of 3 CITYoJALlN , ' ._-, ~-- "~.~"~-#~-~ ... . . Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of 1'1,' not less than 8% x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map sha 11 be identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map sha 11 include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500) feet beyond the limits of the proposed change. To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be fully dimensioned. ~ The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District boundaries. List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across' the street from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be tQose appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list. NAME ADDRESS - (See attached Exhibit "B") r I '--' B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: Single Family Residential PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2) copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved. For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful to the review of this application. ,., Plans and Exhibits submitted Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan ; Sketch j" ----- ----- ----- ----- Photographs _____; Other (specify) 2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existinf and probably future land use character of the vicinity. ,...... Proposed use is consistent with surrounding resid~~tial land uses and I.. \..... conforms to Dublin's Community Plan Land Use Element Page 2 of 3 pages .._~_._~. . . . ~,_.- - .,."...-_.~~_.,-,._-- -- --, 4 ". . 3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES NO X If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration ~" C. AFFIDAVIT Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property: APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, I (wa) Timothy M. Kelley Arrornpy for rnp being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/~~ the^owner(s)/~~ of being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/~~x~~~ the^tt%~~~~)J~~~ of land included in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached, and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/~ability present ,t"""" the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and.that the statements and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the "-' best of my/sax knowledge and belief. Holding Corporation of Ohio and Dunmere Associates, A Limited Partnership By: ~~ rLIU1L-/ I Attorney (signature) 0 c/o Timothy M. Kelley 250 East Broad Street Columbus. Ohio 4321~ (Mailing address) (614)228-5775 (Phone) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1992. 28th December , 1:~ /;0 //a~' _ i ~ (notary Publi JOAN T. COOPE Person to be contacted for details, fl. Notar~ Public-State of Ohio ,.... i other than above signatorMj ommlsslon Expires .- 7-13-94 \..., \, (Name (Address) (Telephone) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not wrIte below thIs-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - D. RECORD OF ACTION 1. Withdrawn Held to (Date) (Date) 2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modified 3. City Council: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modified "___ ~ _e ~ n~_~~ ".--- ~_. .~'__..."~,~.~_.""'-"-" '~-"" .. EXHIBIT liB" Owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street from area proposed to be rezoned. Dunmere Associates, A Limited Partnership c/o Donald W. Kelley 250 East Broad street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 ,~. Ohio Holding Co. c/o Robert Albright 600 s. High street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 ~ Brand Road Investment Co., Ltd. c/o Donald W. Kelley 250 East Broad street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 City of Dublin 6665 Coffman Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Jeffrey R. Yocca Builders, Inc. 959 Schrock Road, Columbus, Ohio 43229 Turnbury Owners Association 5890 Sawmill Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Newtowne Homes, Inc. 5890 Sawmill Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Holding Corporation of Ohio c/o Robert Albright 600 s. High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 Karen L. Matusoff r 5608 Caplestone Lane, Dublin, Ohio 43017 I Robert J. & Maxine Silverman '-" 5604 Caplestone Lane, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Stanley o. Nollenberger 5600 Caplestone Lane, DUblin, Ohio 43017 Shawnee Hills Land Company 5131 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 James P. & Debra C. L. Ankrom 8087 Simfield Road, DUblin, Ohio 43017 The Borror Corporation 5501 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Ashlee Homes, Inc. 6631 Commerce Parkway, Suite P, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Rockford Homes 131 Dillmont Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43235 Luciani Builders, Inc. 336 Avon Court, Dublin, Ohio 43017 JI""""o Jodi L. Mague .. '--' 5545 Caplestone Lane, Dublin, Ohio 43017 May 14, 1993 Ms. Roberta Clarke City of Dublin 5131 Post Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Re: Dublinshire Section 6 1 4 0 0 Preliminary Plat West Fifth Avenue Dear Bobbie: Columbus, Ohio 43212 Enclosed for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission are 15 copies of the preliminary plat for Section 6 of Dublinshire. Tel 614,487.1888 This plan has been revised since the May 6, 1993 Planning and Zoning meeting Fax 614.487.0964 to reflect concerns raised. Some of the significant changes: 1) Lots 550, 554, 557 & 558 are 70' at building line, all others 80'. 2) Lot lines of Lots 560 & 563 have been adjusted to follow the tree line north of Dublinshire Drive, This will maximize the ability to preselVe trees. 3) Notes have been added to the plan relating to tree preselVation and landscaping. 4) On-site detention has been added. j'''''''~ 5) A typical section for the Dublinshire Drive bikeway has been , , added. Please call if you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. aL . . Gabriel, P President Enclosures xc: Tim Kelley CIVIL ENGINEERING I ASSOCIATESI -; ~ ............- ~ RECORD OF ACTION DUBLIN PLANNING AND WNING COMMISSION MAY 6, 1993 CITY OF DtBLl\ The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action in the application below at its regular meeting: A\ 1. Rezoning Application Z93-o02 - Dublinshire Section 6 Location: 9.99 acres located on the northeast and southeast comers of Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire .J Drive. Existin~ Zonine: R-l, Restricted Suburban Residential District. Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Proposed Use: 26 single-family lots. Applicant: Holding Corporation of Ohio and Dunrnere Associates, c/o Timothy M. Kelley, 250 East Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with the following twelve conditions: Conditions: 1) That the developer design and construct a bikepath along the north side of Dublinshire Drive and provide any necessary easement for same; 2) That a landscape plan for Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive be provided consistent with the area; 3) That the developer select a name to be used throughout the development process for all plats, plans, etc. related to this site prior to City Council; 4) That Dublinshire Drive not provide vehicular access to the abutting lots; 5) That the layout be designed to meet the City Engineer's requirements as to spacing between intersections, angles of intersection, cul-de-sac design, easements, etc.; 6) That the approval of the layout of the preliminary plat will be dependent upon meeting the design criteria of the City Engineer and demonstrating developability of all Jots; 7) That stormwater detention and velocity control calculations be provided to meet the Dublin guidelines and meet the approval of the City Engineer; ....., 8) That the 24-inch sanitary sewer alignment and extension be satisfactory to the City Engineer; 'I 9) That the developer provide right~f-way along Dublinsbire Drive, if necessary, to provide for ., the addition of left turn lane(s) at Muirfield Drive, as determined by the City Engineer; 10) That concerns such as traffic circulation, access, and safety be addressed by the developer for the future extension of Richens Drive to the north; 11) That a tree preservation plan be implemented to protect the trees in the fence row during construction; and 12) That the density of the development be no greater than 2.5 units per acre, with not more than five lots being less than 80 feet in width. * The applicant agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-1 RESULT: This rezoning application was approved with conditions. STAFF CERTIFICATION: ~,-~-,,,,-;m , ~~ ar ara M. Clarke Planning Director' AlII' . ..,~~"'--<......~.--_.~~ <._,-_...... Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 2 1. Rezoning Application Z93-002 - Dublinshire Section 6 Chairman Manus stated that no new submittals had been received to address the Commission's concerns from the last meeting regarding detention, density, developability of certain lots, and parkland; this case should be deferred until new submittals are made. The applicant, Mr. Tim Kelley, said a number of concerns had been addressed in writing to Terry Foegler and Barbara Clarke. He planned to present a plan which he stated would .'~, incorporate such comments. Anything not addressed will be a part of the preliminary plat application. He said they were prepared to address the issues now. Mr. Manus asked if he wanted an informal discussion. Mr. Kelley said he was asking for a formal approval/disapproval of this rezoning application by the Commission. Mr. Kelley understood that the decision would be made on the plan submitted and on the commitments made here. The plan will not change in substance, He will address those items raised as concerns which caused the tabling last month. Ms. Clarke said that Mr. Kelley did submit a letter to Mr. Foegler, April 27th or 29th, which was discussed with the Engineering Staff. The Staff lacked necessary information regarding traffic studies, left turn lanes, etc. Discussions between the staff and developer were still taking place, with no resolutions made. The developer had not responded in writing, and there was no new plan. Mr. Manus said based on this, he did not know how the Commission could proceed without the information needed to make a sound judgement. Mr. Kelley said the Commission should remove the application from the table to hear the responses to the concerns which caused the tabling. The plan has not changed except with respect to items that will be specifically committed to at this meeting and which will be shown on the preliminary plat, as is required by Code. He again asked for a formal recommendation. Mr. Banchefsky said new submission or modifications should be presented to staff. Ms. Stillwell asked if density, parkland dedication, lot size, footprints, etc. which were requested in the minutes would be discussed at this meeting. Mr. Kelly said yes. Mr. Banchefsky said the Commission was anticipating a new submission which Staff had not had a chance to review. He suggested that the Commission go forward and make a determination if the new information is adequate. It can be Tabled again if it does not answer those issues from last meeting. Mr. Geese moved that this case be removed from the table with a twenty minute time limit. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 7-0.) I"""'" ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 3 Mr. Kelley said the lot width at the Woods of Dublinshire is a minimum 75 feet, but they will commit to 80-foot lots abutting it (along the east side of Jontimm Drive). Most of the approximately 10 acres is located on existing Dublinshire Drive on the east side of Muirfield Boulevard/Muirfield Drive. A small portion of property is located on the north side of Dublinshire Drive. They have applied for PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Many of the details discussed at the last hearing are really preliminary plat issues. The 23 lots on the south side of Dublinshire Drive have been reduced to 22 lots, resulting in an 80- foot minimum lot length on the east and south sides of Jontimm Drive. They need some 75- foot lots on the west side of Jontimm Drive to deal with a difficult alignment of Dublinshire -, Drive. They will have 25-foot no-build zones along the rear of these lots, including no , fencing or buildings of any kind. .....' Detention could be over-detained on a neighboring site along the south side of Bear Run to accommodate the detention required for these lots south of Dublinshire Drive. The resulting overall rate of runoff after development would be the same with respect to downstream property. They have decided that this might be difficult to visualize, and so they will provide detention on the north side of Bear Run instead. The specific location will be shown on the preliminary plat. He showed a drawing with the general location of the basin. He stated there was a possibility of still over-detaining in Dublinshire, Section 5, if the City was interested. He would be interested in parkland trade-offs or something similar. The lot lines along the tree row have been realigned to preserve two-thirds of it. He said two or three good sized trees will be preserved on the eastern and western third sides. Stafr s recommendation for turn lanes on Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive will be accommodated by giving additional right-of-way as part of the preliminary plat. The parkland is located along Bear Run as planned. Landscaping and mounding will be consistent with the treatment along Muirfield Drive. Mr. Kelley said there was a carry-over park credit from other developments being applied in this development. ,-, I There was some discussion about the width of the parkland strips. Some areas are as narrow I .....1 as 15 feet, some 80 feet, some wider. Mr. Kelley said the scenic character of the boulevard would be maintained by extensive mounding and landscaping, consistent with prior zonings. Mr. Manus asked how many 75-foot wide lots were left. Mr. Kelley said no more than three or four lots. All of the lots on the east and south sides of Jontimm are 80 feet wide. Mr. Kelley said north, there were four lots on a cul-de-sac which had not been measured, but they would be a minimum of 75 feet wide. Of the 25 lots, 20 would be 80 feet wide, and the balance would be no less than 75 feet wide. A~ _'~.o..~~.'~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission , Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 4 Ms. Stillwell asked if the stormwater detention was changed because of the Engineering Staff s advice. Mr. Kelley said he revised it to advance this application. He said it did have merit to reduce the overall number of detention basins generally. They are still open to discussion of over- sizing to the south, if there can be some trade-offs. .- Mr. Foegler said that Staff believed that either option works, and would recommend that the issue be finalized as a preliminary plat concern. Mr. Foegler said the Staff recommendation was for approval for this rezoning subject to a series of conditions. He received a '"',' memorandum on April 29 from Mr. Kelley addressing the primary conditions and concerns of the Commission. One was detention, which Staff thinks is solvable in a number of ways. The other was lot density. In terms of a traffic study, Staff does not feel that a study is necessary for this project, however; the right-of-way should be preserved for a potential left turn lane on Dublinshire Drive, and will be discussed with the preliminary plat. The issue about a sanitary sewer routing and location will also be addressed when the preliminary plat is filed. The other Commission concerns, to the degree that Mr. Kelley's presentation addresses those concerns, need the Commission's decision. Ms. Clarke said that the Staff was recommending approval of this rezoning application, and a revised Staff Report was distributed this evening to the Commission. The ten conditions recommended by Staff address the items thought to be appropriate. The conditions do not address other issues raised by the Commission, such as density, parkland configuration, or the redesigning the lots to preserve the tree row. Staff recommends approval with the following ten conditions: 1) That the developer design and construct a bikepath along the north side of Dublinshire Drive, and provide any necessary easement for same; 2) That the landscape plan for Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive be provided and "l'I~ be consistent with the area; 3) That the developer select a name to be used throughout the development process for all plats, plans, etc. related to this site prior to submission to City Council; 4) That Dublinshire Drive not provide vehicular access for the abutting lots; 5) That the layout be designed to meet the City Engineer's requirements as to spacing between intersections, angles of intersections, cul-de-sac designs, easements, etc.; 6) That the approval of the layout of the preliminary plat will be dependent upon meeting the design criteria of the City Engineer and demonstrating developability of all lots; 7) That stormwater detention be provided to meet Dublin's guidelines and meet the approval of the City Engineer; 8) That the 24-inch sanitary sewer alignment and extension be satisfactory to the City Engineer; ~ ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 5 9) That the developer provide right-of-way along Dublinshire Drive, if necessary, to provide for the addition of left turn lane(s) at Muirfield Drive, as determined by the City Engineer; and 10) That the concerns such as traffic circulation, access, and safety be addressed by the developer for the future extension of Richens Drive to the north. Ms. Clarke said that Mr. Kelley agrees to address the City's concerns regarding the area to the north within his final development plan for the Property immediately north of Dublinshire Drive, which is part of the Earlington panhandle. The City wants to ensure that the ..., intersection designed will be adequate for all development to the north. I Mr. Rauh asked that "stormwater detention and velocity control calculations be provided" be .-' added to Condition #7. Mr. Fishman was concerned about the density being too high. He would rather see the developments limited to 2.3 or 2.4 units per acre with usable parkland. Mr. Peplow said Lots #446, #447, #448 were previously identified as difficult to develop, and asked if those lots were now 80-feet wide. Mr. Kelley said yes. Mr. Geese said that no one, including Staff, had received the plan being presented. He said the Commission did not get a footprint or word description of the proposal. He asked if streetlights were planned of the intersections. Mr. Kelley said that the streetlights are not currently required by the City. He said the plan submitted previously was more detailed than required for a rezoning request. There have been no changes to street alignments. They have addressed lot width issues and detention. Mr. Geese said the Commission had asked for the location of the detention in Section 5. He was in support of having one detention basin for both of the sections. ~ I Mr. Geese said the fence row to the north was protected now. Mr. Geese asked if the ten I conditions were acceptable. Mr. Kelley said yes. -, Mr. Kelley summarized the density proposed by saying that the density of the ten acres, excluding Dublinshire Drive, (25 lots) is 2.5 units per acre. Typically the Dublinshire Drive right-of-way is included in the gross density calculation. Mr. Geese asked Mr. Kelley if he would pay a park fee since the park was unusable. Mr. Kelley said no, because the park was agreed to in prior hearings. They over-dedicated parkland for the prior developments to be used as a credit. In some developments, it is difficult to give good pods of parkland. ..... '"~'_",.,-,-~-~" .'.~.'...."_._--~'." Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission . Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 6 Ms. Clarke said 1.68 acres of parkland is required for this proposal. The park shown is 1.13 acres. She said the developer does have a parkland "credit" accumulated of 2.28 acres for areas where more land than necessary was set aside for park. Mr. Geese said the parkland is useless to the City. He said he was supportive of it if they would have 80-foot wide lots, pay the park fee, and have one detention basin. Mr. Geese said that 1.68 acres should be paid as a park fee, considering the credit. Mr. Kelley said there was a credit carried forward from prior development. They dedicated more parkland than was required, and the City agreed to view the excess as a credit. Ms. Stillwell stated that there was not really a question on the amount, but the type of land dedicated for the parkland. Mr. Geese asked if the detention basin was included as parkland. Mr. Kelley said no, the City's policy was not to count the detention. Mr. Fishman stated that what the City was given was worthless for parkland. Mr. Kelley said the City needed the parkland where the bikepath connects. There will not be enough right-of-way to get up and over to accommodate the easement or necessary connection underneath. It is an important part of the bikepath system. The other parts of the parkland will allow more screening of Muirfield Drive and will be consistent with existing Muirfield Drive. The triangular piece to the south is mostly for detention and opens up to the large amount of parkland along Bear Run. Mr. Kelley said the mounds would meet the standard Muirfield Drive treatment as required by the City. Mrs. Stillwell asked if they were willing to do a more extensive tree preservation plan. Mr. Kelley said they would do what it took to preserve trees along lot lines. Mr. Sutphen asked Staff about the Landmark Tree Program, and if the caliper, etc. need to be noted. Ms. Newcomb said the Landmark Tree Program deals with trees of 24 inches and above, usually a tree survey identifies all trees over six inches. Mr. Sutphen asked if, by law, developers are required to note trees on the plan. Ms. Clarke responded that tree masses are to be noted on the preliminary plat.Mr. Sutphen said he would like to see the large trees designated on the next plan, and Mr. Kelley agreed. - IlliIIIIIIilo Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 6, 1993 Page 7 Mrs. Stillwell moved that this rezoning application be approved with the following twelve conditions: 1) That the developer design and construct a bikepath along the north side of Dublinshire Drive and provide any necessary easement for same; 2) That a landscape plan for Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive be provided consistent with the area; 3) That the developer select a name to be used throughout the development process for all plats, plans, etc. related to this site prior to City Council; ..., 4) That Dublinshire Drive ,not provide vehicular access to the abutting lots; I ,~ , 5) That the layout be designed to meet the City Engineer's requirements as to spacing ....J between intersections, angles of intersection, cul-de-sac design, easements, etc.; 6) That the approval of the layout of the preliminary plat will be dependent upon meeting the design criteria of the City Engineer and demonstrating developability of all lots; 7) That stormwater detention be provided to meet the Dublin guidelines and meet the approval of the City Engineer; 8) That the 24-inch sanitary sewer alignment and extension be satisfactory to the City Engineer; 9) That the developer provide right-of-way along Dublinshire Drive, if necessary, to provide for the addition of left turn lane(s) at Muirfield Drive, as determined by the City Engineer; 10) That concerns such as traffic circulation, access, and safety be addressed by the developer for the future extension of Richens Drive to the north. 11) That a tree preservation plan be implemented to protect the trees in the fence row during construction; and 12) That the density of the development be no greater than 2.5 units per acre, with not more than five lots being less than 80 feet in width. Mr. Geese seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Geese, ,AI\ I yes; Mr. Manus, no; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; and I Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 6-1). .....J 2. Concept Plan - Maxster North Glen Dugger, Attorney, 37 W. Broad Street, requested that this application be tabled. Mr. Rauh moved that the case remain tabled until the next meeting. Mr. Fishman seconded. Ms. Catherin Headlee, 7340 Brand Road, pointed out that this case had been tabled twice. She felt that the postponement of the case was a wasting people's time. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, abstain; Mr. Geese~ yes; Mr. Manus, no; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; and Mr. Rauh, yes. Mr. Sutphen was absent for vote. (Tabled 4-1-1.) ...... .,- ..._._.-----~""""=. ~.,,~-'~",,"-.- STAFF REPORT DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF DrBL!:\" MAY 6, 1993 CASE 1: Rezoning Application - Z93-002 - Dublinshire Section 6 APPLICANT: Holding Corporation of Ohio, c/o Timothy M. Kelley, 250 East Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215 REQUEST: To rezone 9.99 acres located on the northeast and southeast corners of Dublinshire Drive and Muirfield Drive from R-l, Restricted Suburban Development District to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. BACKGROUND: The site was considered some years ago in an overall Concept Plan for the project called Dunmere. It is still zoned R-l. This request to rezone property from the R-l zone to the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. The plan sets forth the general layout, lot size, access, park area, utility service, and development standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make its recommendation on the rezoning requested and then return the application to City Council. A public hearing will be conducted there. Following that, City Council will vote on the ordinance. A two-thirds vote of Council is required in order to override the recommendation of the Commission. If approved, the proposal will be reviewed under the preliminary and final platting procedures as well. This rezoning application was considered on April 8, 1993, and it was tabled after a lengthy discussion by the Planning and Zoning Commission. During the discussion, additional information was requested regarding detention requirements, lot layout, density, the need for left turn lanes, preservation of trees, and parkland configuration. The applicant has revised his rezoning petition since it was originally ftled--but not since last month's hearing. The acreage was reduced, and the application no longer includes any part of the Earlington Village (panhandle) PUD. A revised ordinance will need to be forwarded to City Council at a later date. CONSIDERATIONS: 0 The site is located just to the north of the Bear Run and on the east side of Muirfield Drive. To the north is the Earlington Village panhandle and additional undeveloped R-l property. To the east are the Dublinshire 3 subdivision located on the north side of Dublinshire Drive, and the Woods of Dublinshire subdivision to the south of the road (both portions of the Earlington Village PUD). 0 Utilities are available and adequate to service the proposed development. - ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - May 6, 1993 Page 2 0 The site will be served by the extension of the 24-inch sanitary sewer which currently terminates at the northeast corner of the site along Dublinshire Drive. The sewer is to be extended, and the alignment is being changed from what was originally intended. The developer and the City Engineer need to reach agreement on how and where the line will be placed. 0 The proposal is to subdivide the property into 26 single-family lots. The proposed density is to be 2.6 dwelling units per acre, as calculated on a gross land basis. Other densities in the area include Earlington Village at 3.28 dwelling units per acre, ...., Dublinshire at 2.56 units per acre, Dublinshire 4 at 2.59 per acre and Dublinshire 5 at 2.4 per acre. , 0 The parkland proposed here is a border along the boulevard. The Commission ~I members may recall that in several rezoning actions in the area by the same developer, excess parkland was identified and dedicated by the developer at that time. This plan includes the reference to those previous "parkland credits" of 2.28 acres and includes a new dedication of 1.13 acres to meet the 1.68 acre park requirement for the R-l parcel. The PUD portion of the site has already met its park obligations under the Earlington Village Plan. 0 Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive are already completed through this area. The balance of the streets are standard residential construction. There will be no curb cuts onto Muirfield Drive, and the City Engineer recommends that no driveway access be permitted on Dublinshire Drive. 0 Since the layout is generally approved as part of the PLR rezoning, it should be noted that acute angle intersections should not be less than 80 degrees. The intersections of Johntimm and Richens Drives with Dublinshire Drive will require further review. 0 The applicant's submission does not contain development standards for the subdivision, and those will need to be clearly indicated prior to submission to City Council. 0 The City Engineer has expressed a number of specific concerns about the street layout which are premature for consideration as part of the rezoning application. These will be furnished to the applicant to assist with the design as he progresses through the ...., platting process. I 0 Stormwater detention for the area south of Dublinshire Drive will be provided by -,# oversizing detention in Dublinshire Section 5, Phase 4. Detention for the area north of Dublinshire Drive will be provided by oversizing detention in the Ohio Holding Corporation parcel to the north. Calculations need to be submitted to the City Engineer. 0 A landscape plan which is consistent with the balance of Muirfield Drive should be included. Dublinshire should have a consistent treatment as well. 0 The bikepath tunnel is located on the north side of Dublinshire Drive, to connect the two existing paths to the east and west of the site and a bikepath should be constructed across the site on the north side of Dublinshire Drive. 0 The name of this subdivision is listed as "Dublinshire Section 6." The developer is requested to select at this time the name by which this land will be known throu~hout the development process. Changes from "Earlington" to "Dublinshire" to "Dunmere" will not be permitted for any city or recording purposes. ...... ~-. ~ _._---"~, --~~._~-~-~-"~-<.-~.~".,-",,"--._-,_.-,"- - .Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - May 6, 1993 . Page 3 0 Several lots appear to be difficult to develop. Developability will need to be demonstrated in conjunction with the preliminary plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends approval of this rezoning application with the following ten conditions: I"""" Conditions: \ l 1) That the developer design and construct a bikepath along the north side of ~ Dublinshire Drive and provide any necessary easement for same; 2) That a landscape plan for Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive be provided consistent with the area; 3) That the developer select a name to be used throughout the development process for all plats, plans, etc. related to this site prior to City Council; 4) That Dublinshire Drive not provide vehicular access to the abutting lots; 5) That the layout be designed to meet the City Engineer's requirements as to spacing between intersections, angles of intersection, cul-de-sac design, easements, etc.; 6) That the approval of the layout of the preliminary plat will be dependent upon meeting the design criteria of the City Engineer and demonstrating developability of all lots; 7) That stormwater detention be provided to meet the Dublin guidelines and meet the approval of the City Engineer; 8) That the 24-inch sanitary sewer alignment and extension be satisfactory to the City Engineer; 9) That the developer provide right-of-way along Dublinshire Drive, if necessary, to provide for the addition of left turn lane(s) at Muirfield Drive, as determined by the City Engineer; and 10) That concerns such as traffic circulation, access, and safety be addressed by the developer for the future extension of Richens Drive to the north. Bases: 1) The proposal demonstrates a single-family land use and density consistent with the Community Plan. 2) The proposal expands upon the parkland along the boulevard program being established. 3) The development proposal is consistent with the character already established on adjacent sites. ,,-. .......... ". --;. .",' -- -.. --'-"--' ._-. .-." BR4ND RD ! ! . -, ::;Cfj)' -~~: P9 .:. ~:: ._0.. ...,.. 0 '~;:~;m~, ; i .0 .:..:....~ . . . ! ! ....--..--. ----~~ counaros ~ RJ) , " -" " 33 161 ",,' i ~l~ _.,__. Z93-002 ~} Rezoning Application " ~ Dub IIns h.fCEL V I ." . ..-...--....-. .., .. ..... OF z HIO .000 - PLR .-- -.""'~-- .. - z 0 - Z R R peD Z~3-002 Rezoning Application . Dublfnshlre VI , - - Dublin Planing and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 8, 1993 Page 2 1. Rezoning Application - Z93-002 - Dublinshire Section 6 Ms. Clarke presented slides of the site and the staff report. The request is to rezone 10 acres from R-l, Restricted Suburban Residential, to the PLR, Planned Low Density District. The density, layout, parkland etc. become set upon rezoning. During the platting process, the specific easements, lot lines, and alignments will be determined. The proposal is for 27 [later ~ corrected to 26] single-family lots with a gross density of 2.7 [later corrected to 2.6] dwelling , units per acre. The densities in the general area range from 2.5 to 3.3 dwellings per acre. The ~, developer has a parkland "credit" of2.2 acres, due to dedicating more than the required acreage in Earlington Village, along the Bear Run, and in other adjacent neighborhoods. Park of 1.13 acres along the north side of the Bear Run and along Muirfield Drive is being provided here; 1.68 acres is the dedication requirement. The balance will come from the accumulated parkland "credit. " Ms. Clarke stated there are no curb cuts onto Muirfield Drive, and the City Engineer recommends no driveways onto Dublinshire Drive. A bikepath along the north side of Dublinshire Drive will connect with the bikepath tunnel under Muirfield Drive. The application was ftled as Dublinshire Section 6, and the City will require that the project maintain only one name, to be used during the entire zoning and platting processes. There have been some administrative difficulties when projects change names in the middle of the process. Several of the lots appear to be difficult to develop without the granting of variances, and all lots should be verified as being "developable" at the time of the preliminary plat. Staff is recommending approval with the seven conditions as written in the Staff Report as well as an eighth condition. 1) That the developer design and construct a bike path along the north side of Dublinshire ...., Drive and provide any necessary easement for same; I 2) That a landscape plan for Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive be provided consistent ....1lI" with the area; 3) That the developer select a name to be used throughout the development process for all plats, plans, etc. related to this site prior to City Council; 4) That Dublinshire Drive not provide vehicular access to the abutting lots; 5) That the layout be designed to meet the City Engineer's requirements as to spacing between intersections, angles of intersection, cul-de-sac design, easements, etc.; 6) That the approval of the layout of the preliminary plat will be dependent upon meeting the design criteria of the City Engineer and demonstrating developability of all lots; 7) That stormwater detention be provided to meet the Dublin guidelInes and meet the approval of the City; and 8) That the 24-inch sanitary sewer alignment and extension be satisfactory to the City Engineer. Randy Bowman added a ninth condition: Dublinshire 6 - Z93-002 P&Z Minutes . 1/5 April 1993 ....~ Planning and Zoning Commission . Meeting Minutes - April 8, 1993 Page 3 9) That the developer address the need for left turn lanes at the corner of Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive. Mr. Manus asked if the city's master sanitary sewer plan would need to be amended regarding the 24-inch sewer line. Ms. Clarke responded that the developer and the City Engineer should agree in writing on the appropriate alignment and sewer extension. Ms. Stillwell clarified that the project included 26, not 27, lots. Ms. Clarke confirmed the total number of lots as 26 and the gross density of 2.6 units per acre. Tim Kelley, representing the applicant, introduced himself and made several clarifications regarding the conditions listed. He would like better defmition of the assessment needed regarding left turn lanes. He said a plan was fIled last year to rezone this site in conjunction with the Dunmere Associates property. These will now be processed separately. Dunmere Associates property will be fIled as a fmal development plan, but it is shown on the plans to give the Commission the whole picture of what is planned. He has already made most of the changes regarding the angles of intersection, but will satisfy the City Engineer (condition 5). This will be more detailed on the preliminary plat. The detention requirements will be met by over detaining off-site, and this will be subject to review by the City Engineer (condition 7). Randy Bowman restated that the applicant should address the need for turn lanes on Muirfield Drive and Dublinshire Drive at their intersection. This would be a traffic study performed by the applicant's engineer. Mr. Kelley said his development was a very minor part of the traffic. Muirfield Drive was designed and constructed by Dublin according to its standards; Dublinshire Drive was also constructed to city standards. Mr. Kelley offered to demonstrate the impact of his development's traffic. Mr. Kindra stated that the streets needed to be studied regarding the new turns in addition to the existing traffic movements. The developer is typically asked to address the need for traffic improvements. The city is not saying that all improvements are the responsibility of the developer. Mr. Kelley will meet with the city staff to resolve this. ,~"",,,,,,,,,,, Mr. David Ulstad stated that the density here is higher that in the rest of the area. Also, he felt that the detention planned was inappropriate, and he wants all flows into the Bear Run to be _. controlled. Mr. Neal Hahn, 5701 Brand Road, stated that storm water is a problem in the area and wants detention for development on-site. Mr. Randy Bank is buying a home along the east property line of the site and is concerned about the storm water and density. He wants a no-build zone of greater than 20 feet along the abutting property and to assure that the trees along the north side of the creek will be preserved. Mr. Dan Sutphen asked for the defmition of "flood limits" as used on the plans. He also wants the floodway line shown. Randy Bowman and Jim Gabriel, the applicant's engineer, confirmed that the flood limit shown was the l00-year floodplain. Mr. Sutphen felt the density was too high and was disappointed with the park land set aside. He wants the plans to reflect the bikepath along Muirfield Drive. He is uncomfortable with any acreage that flows directly into Dublinshire 6 - Z93-002 P&Z Minutes April 1993 a/5 ."",", ~ Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 8, 1993 Page 4 the creek without detention. Mr. Kelley said that the detention basin to the south will be over- sized, and the overall rate of run-off of the combined sites will be the same as it would be if there were two smaller basins. Mr. Sutphen feels the velocity of the water should be slowed, and there are existing serious storm problems along the Bear Run. Mr. Gabriel stated that detention is not being avoided, but for this site the water would run directly into the stream. In Dublinshire 5 (25 lots), the detention area is extra large, and the overall result is equivalent detention. ~ Mr. Sutphen expressed that the park space would only benefit the adjacent property owners. I ...-/ People cannot access the park areas easily without trespassing, especially around Lot 450. Mr. Gabriel responded that these areas are added to the Bear Run park in an adjacent phase. They include a buffer strip along Muirfield Drive and space for the bikeway tunnel. Mr. Kelley prefers not having bikepaths between lots, but he will insta11 whatever bikepaths are required. Janet Jordan stated that often easements for bike paths are identified during the plat phase, but she stressed that safe crossing points need to be identified. Judi Stillwell said she felt the density was appropriate for the area. She asked for a description of the buffer strip. Mr. Kelley said it would be landscaped consistent other phases along Muirfield Drive, and this will be identified at the preliminary plat. A standard has been worked out for Dublinshire Section 4 and 5. Ms. Stillwell felt the detention basin issue needed to be addressed. Mr. Kelley asked if this was more of a preliminary plat issue than a zoning issue. Ms. Clarke agreed. Ron Geese stated it would be appropriate to table the application. He asked if sidewalks were included. Based on Dublin code, all the lots will need to have sidewalks insta11ed when the houses are built. He is not satisfied with the parkland and asked who will own Bear Run when the development is done. Janet Jordan said the City would own it. Mr. Kelley said the parkland (..., is north of Bear Run to be dedicated part of the approval of Dublinshire, Section 5. Mr. Geese felt the park was only creek bed, floodplain and very little useable property in Dublinshire 5. II He voted against it because he thought it was too dense. Mr. Geese noted that Lot #445 had .... a stand of trees on it. He asked if the Woods of Dublin bikeway that goes back parallel to Bear Run is intended to go further west. Ms. Jordan said there will be a bridge across the Bear Run, and then it goes into the woods that is an extension of Scottish Corners. Mr. Geese also does not approve of detention basins using up the park space. Mr. Kelley said even though it is in the park, they did not get credit for it. Mr. Geese felt that it was better to have one detention basin instead of two, but he felt another lot needed to be given in Section 5. He said the density in Dublin Woods was 2.1, and that 2.7 units per acre was too high. He did not understand why the City was taking four lots on the north side of Dublinshire tonight, and 22 on the south side. Mr. Kelley said he had tried to pursue a joint application, and it was important to keep the zoning process moving. Mr. Geese also wants the fence row maintained as a natural barrier. He asked that street lighting be provided at Dublinshire and Muirfield Drives as other applicants have agreed to do at major intersections. Mr. Kelley stated this is an issue that the City should Dublinshire 6 - Z93-002 P&Z Minutes April '1993 3/S .....~ - Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 8, 1993 Page 5 debate and include in its subdivision code if necessary. Mr. Geese said lighting should be required at least at each side of the intersection, regardless of the density. It was agreed that the bikepath will be built in the north side of Dublinshire Drive. Mr. Geese requested that Lots 451, 448, 447, 445, 442, 458, 459, and 440 be redrawn to show the buildable areas. Mr. Kelley said the lots are consistent other lots developed in this area. Dublinshire Drive right- of-way which is over an acre has not included to calculate the gross density. Dublinshire Drive has already been built and deeded to the City, and it is excluded from density calculations. Because of the City's and applicant's desire to develop parkland and other developments in excess of the requirements, this development is taking a credit for parkland already committed. If that parkland were included as part of this development, the gross density would be lower. Mr. Geese said that the lots named were not consistent with the Woods of Dublinshire. There is a fence row between Woods of Dublinshire and Dublinshire Section 6. Mr. Kelley said the lot sizes are close but not as deep. Mr. Fishman agreed with the previous comments. He was concerned about the lots under 80 feet in width. He felt the plan was poor because it destroyed trees. He would not approve any such development because trees are the only character of the area. He mentioned that the floodplain should be studied. Mr. Fishman asked about the depth of the Muirfield Drive setback. Ms. Clarke said this will be mostly a landscape buffer and then typically it is 50 feet along Muirfield Drive. Mr. Fishman said he would like to see the density a little lower. Mr. Peplow stated that he agreed that lot size and density were concerns. He asked how a larger detention pond in Section 5 helps with the run-off created by this development into Bear Run. He asked if all the run-off will go into Bear Run with no off-site detention. Mr. Kelley said that it would. Mr. Peplow said that on-site detention would solve problems, and the density ~___T~ should be reduced. \----,- Mr. Manus stated that he had a big problem with the detention plan. The Commission has visited the Bear Run during winter and storm periods, and it is a problem that must be handled. The problem cannot be allowed to worsen with additional development. The density is higher than the properties to the east. Mr. Kelley said that they will abide by the City Engineer's requests at the Preliminary Plat stage, and that he does not feel that is a matter of the zoning issue. They have already agreed that the detention needs to meet with the approval of the City Engineer. With respect to density, these lots are consistent with the lots in the surrounding area. If an 80- foot standard is used, it should be started at Brand Road. The lots in the surrounding area are comparable to these lots. Dunmere's property could probably have a density of 3.5 units per acre, that is how it was zoned many years ago as part of Earlington Village. To isolate this Dublinshire 6 - Z93-002 P&Z Minutes 4/5 . April 1993 -~ Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - April 8, 1993 Page 6 pocket and ignore the surroundings in terms of density, and to require an 80-foot standard does not seem fair. An 80-foot standard further north is probably appropriate. Mr. Manus said Dunmere Associates is 2.5 units per acre. Mr. Kelley said Dunmere Property is zoned at a density that would allow single-family development at five units per acre. It is part of a PUD cluster site. When the area developed, the density was actually lower than permitted. This developer is trying to show you an overall plan for single-family development that is consistent with the area. AI" i Mr. Kelley said the tree row is not a major tree stand. It actually goes between lots in two ../ places and probably can be saved. The configuration of Dublinshire Drive is really what did violence to the land planning with respect to the tree row. They will save the trees between the lots where they can. All of the other trees in the area are being protected by virtue of the parkland dedication. The only way to save the trees would be to redesign the cui de sac coming down from Dunmere and to face some lots onto Dublinshire Drive, backing them up to the tree row. This does not meet the greater goal of restricting curb cuts on Dublinshire Drive. The trees could be saved by putting three lots along Dublinshire Drive. Mr. Geese moved to table this application until next meeting to permit further study on the detention location in Dublinshire 5, review of the parkland dedication, traffic study of the left turn signal be made, and Lots #446, 447, and 448 have a footprint of the plan presented. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. (Tabled 5-1.) The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, no; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. ""'..\ _tIJI Dub I ins h ire 6---:' Z 9 3 - 0 0 2 P&Z Minutes S/S . April 1993 ..., Ji>.J. ~.''''Ii 'L Jill fl1 .Ai " iT '...,.; ----- \ \ " \1 -- ----t ' \ j '.' ,....---- 1 : \ lr - - . ~ PO \, . ~ 1: -- - .~ ----~~~ - ~ '\ ... ~ ~V" - \ =__.. L ~ ......---- \' ~ -s:::o< . ....r ~~ ....... ~\~,. \' ~~! - . \-'_ J, ~ PUD .... '~h..~2 ~~. '. ~~ ~ " -. .' . "v l' . .> ,..- - PUD. -.r ~ .; . ~ ~ " . D ~_ E \. '2\~ ~ c :..~ ________ ~ ~\ - - ~ ~ -t'~R :/ --\\ \\ ~ ) l" "I "- -. : (~\ . ~ ~~ \\ .- -j \.----! . J.. ~ -=2 ~~ii4r ,-~ ~,.. . _'"\~ ~UD ~ ~ ~ . \~ \\--f 1\ --...... . ~ ,..4 ~ ~~ }j ./'~ .- ..' ~ \ .~?""". ~ \L \ r/,,-' ~ ~ , "', ( \ , ..-., \-~~~ '\\. ~ ~ R-I \"' ~v V1~D \\~ M;' \ \l~' . _ ~ ~~ ". " . I ~'<.: If ~ J~\\ .. . i V .A I ,- ,,~ -ANft ':7'~ :~-R-~ ~~-1 ..2 \ \\ \ ~~ ". _ - PLR \___<~"i" PUD' '.~ /....-...... S4bjed- S'k.~~. ...~ '. ~. ~ .~ R-1 \ Ii ~ I \ ~ .~ (UD ... \\--\ \ \ L"'-- -1 ~ R-2 "'Ill! ~. \M \. """" . ~'\ \~"'l , - - \ - "I~ '. .' '\ . - ---":-'.' R-( ~: '" '~.' '~ \~~ :.-:"'~~ . --.. I r. .. p.U;'> "~~""'f/ -~l... 1" '. ...:.,c." ~"'t1~ '- ~ ~ : ~ '.: -,,- ~--....;. '/> ,R-. '.: "pc., ~ ,,, L-- .ft. n '7 PU ----. . ,.-.., \\/ Z . -- _r-IaD-- I .' - I . ,;;;[' V ~.... ,\t' A\!'Jl,~,< '.- o. PL.;,1::. ~'~r' '~JD '. ~ ~';~l~...~.~...,....~~). ~ . . ---"'.....Rl 2~ r I.. .-........ Z ......-1. I ~ I r - 1\__ ' ~ ;~~;.. - ::J \ ~..~~. 'PUD I · ~~L~..---: ~~~I'" \~ \~ ~\ \}9 ../ U~_4 pJ :0' R \ . ~~ _~_ \~ . ~Q . R-2 /~ , '~I'':' ~~~ \~ c':.. 0.:. ~ ~ . __ ~ .~. \ ~ - ~ .-!i. ...... -PUll . ~ .\\ PUD ,,!f " II _ >-~ ., I .. r- ~ . 1 R' 4!]SI~~"'~ .~ . ~ .1 -- ..-' T -~~"'~ -"~ ~ -, \ ":r~' ~~\ \:j ~-;_I T -=;~-.J"-l'JI \ PUD :J-~- ~V , ~.~ 't\-~....\,., _ ' R\-,)fIo~~r-~ ~ ~ 2Q3..o02.. 'I ",.. \G"""' -- ~~ ~.... ~- 2. 1'-\ - - p.-'J,r-<~ '=' ,^. .. A. L -.-..~- l )U ~ c .. · PCP . ., _ R \ peo ~. P~D l\ \ ..~. ~~~ P~b ~}:>>~~, ~ .....'""--',~ - - '- ._~,,-"--~ ,,-.- '" ""_L'''''~~_,,_"'''"'..~_ ,"_, TIMOTHY M. KELLEY ATTOR.'l'EY AT LAW 2ao EAST BROAD STREET COLUMBUS. OHIO 4321a - . (614) 226-a77a FAX (614) 226-1098 December 29, 1992 ,.... U.5 fYI It! l.- VIA F~X ~-alm EEI.J.. vJ:.~ Bobbie Clarke Director of Planning Ci ty of Dublin 5131 Post Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dear Bobbie: Enclosed is a rezoning application for the property located east of Muirfield Drive on both sides of the new Dublinshire Drive extension owned by Holding Corporation of Ohio and Dunmere Associates. Jim Gabriel of civil Engineering Associates is sending copies of the development plan under separate cover. As you know, the property owned by Dunmere Associates is currently zoned PUD. If you prefer, the enclosed application should be considered as an application for final development plan approval. That way, the parkland dedication already made in connection with ~he original Earlington r~zoning would stay intact. The items could proceed together at the planning commissions so that the commission can see how the proposed development works together. If you believe that it is more advantageous for the property owner to pursue an actual rezoning of the property owned by Dunmere Associates, please advise. If you' are available, I would like to schedule a meeting to show you our proposed layout for this area so that we can respond to your comments and concerns. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you, Bobbie, and best wishes for a happy new year. Yours truly, RECE\VED .---;--- b--- DEe 2 9 1992 Timothy M. Kelley CiTY OF.DUBU~ (wi encl. ) cc: J~m Gabr~el lIe r "'~M____'''~,"~ ____~,____._,._~......-"""" ~ ~-",..~-- ...-.."". . rnm WI ~ ~: ~ [r TIMOTHY M. KELLEY CITY OF DUBlJ:i__; ATTORNEY AT LAW 250 East Broad street, suite 1100 Columbus, Ohio 43215-3721 Telephone (614) 228-5775 Fax (614) 228-1098 FAX TRANSMISSION MEMO ,- ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS INFORMATION WILL BE SENT BY MAIL. --X- ____ ) I YES NO DATE: 3/11/93 TIME: J; 30 PAGE 1 OF:S TO: Bobbie Clarke FROM: Tim Kelley RE: Dublinshire section 6 - Case Z93-002 I have attached a set of Development Standards which supplement the standards set forth on the plat. If you feel that additional development standards should be provided, please advise. Also attached is the signed "utility disclaimer". Thank you, Bobbie. cc: Jim Gabriel ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this telecopy is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual named above. If you receive this communication in error, please immediately telephone us collect, and return this message to us at the above address via the u.S. Postal Service. ------------------------------------------------------------------- ,'~ .....-~,~ ---. <- -..""'""~- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Planned Low Densitv Residential District (Z93-002) (References to "Plat" are to the Preliminary Plat for Dublinshire section 6 Dated 12-29-92) -, Number of Lots: See Plat Minimum Lot Area: See Plat Minimum Lot width: See Plat Minimum Setbacks: Front: 25' Side (Total): 14' Rear: 25' Maximum Height: 35' ,~ " ~ ~ ~--~--^"---_. - , DeveloDment Plan Text. A. The proposed location and size of areas of residential use, indicating dwelling unit densities, dwelling unit types, the total number of dwelling units for each density area and the total number of dwelling units proposed in the development plan. - See Preliminary Plat for Dublinshire section 6 dated 12-29-92 (the "Plat"). B. The proposed size, location and use of nonresidential portions of the tract, including usable open areas, parks, playgrounds, school sites and other areas and spaces with the suggested ownership of such areas and spaces. See Plat C. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage facilities, including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. See Plat. D. The proposed traffic circulation patterns, including public and private streets, parking areas, walks and other accessways, indicating their relationship to topography, existing streets or showing other evidence of reasonableness. See Plat E. The proposed schedule of site development, construction of structures and associated facilities, including sketches and other materials indicating design principles and concepts to be followed in site development, construction, landscaping and other features. Such schedule shall include the proposed use or reuse of existing features such as topography, structures, streets and easements. The site development will likely occur in one phase. Street trees will be planted as required by code and mounding and landscaping appropriate to the parkway character of Muirfield Drive will be provided. F. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other pUblic improvements. The single family use, lot size characteristics and density are consistent with surrounding land uses and the Community Plan. ",- --_..,---<----,,--"-~~_......-~.~--- ,-~- ~ - -- -~.-,_.,~-"---~.,,~,-~.--_.-~,,-'-.~""""~ . G. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the land to effectuate the proposed development plan. Evidence of control includes property rights and the engineering feasibility data which may be necessary. The Applicant owns the subject tract. The Plat demonstrates the engineering feasibility. .,....~ ".- .. ..-.-..,,---.-- MRR-11-1993 13:57 FROM CITY OF DUBLIN DEU. DEPT. TO 92281098 P.02 '.. r c. , . The appliea. t/ owner', h~r~bY ~,eknowl.d8.S, thai: .pprovd " ol(hi.) '(her) e request for--11R /6'1;./ /)ev't/ojl'1(!flr- 1/4" ,by 'the Dublin ~ianning and '. I . ' . Zoning Commission and/or, Dublin,City Coun~il do~s not constitute a guarantee 'or binding commitment, that, the City ,of Dublin will be ahle.to provide essential ",..... services s~ch as water and sewer facilities when needed by said, applicant. The City of Dub],in will"mDke every effort to have these'services available \ as ne'eded. However, the rapid grovth of the City of Dublin and Northwest Franklin Co\i'n'ty, has' stretched the, City's capacity t;o provide' these ser'vi'ces to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part . of said, facilities available to the applicant unt~l some future date. Th~ undersigned hereby, :acknowledges and understands the foregoing. - 1... If ,-1 J .. ~,I~r-:I~ r'~ Date Signature ,of Applicant or authorized representative thereof. On behalf of. ~ . : <Db JfDldlil~ t.Q~ff)rJ1Vh vf- P;' It) 41'14 f)vII /""lYe IT .s.s~e./4Ju ! Applicant . -',: A"it~