22-95 Ordinance
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co, Form No. 30043
Ordinance No. ------.------ -------- Passed____m_____ ____ __________________m_____ _____19________
.1/11"'" AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR
9.893 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HARTIN ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF KRIER
'''';''.-'.,~ DRIVE AND HARTIN ROAD FROM: PUD, PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. (MARTIN COMMONS)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAIN~ by the Council of the City of
Dublin, state of Ohio, of the elected members
concurrl.ng:
section 1. That the following described real estate (see
attached map marked Exhibit "A" ) situated in the City of
Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to Planned unit
Development District and shall be subject to regulations and
procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of
the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and
amendments thereto.
section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list
of contiguous and affected property owners, and the
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning commission, Exhibit
,fPII""""'''l "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of
this Ordinance and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance
therewith.
......,.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this / j-fh day of ~ , 199~.
.
WJf 1,Jj{
Mayor/- resi'ping fficer
Ii
Attest:
~~~
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
,,.......
- . i~ of t";~ Ord:nafK.~{Jvt""".n "11."" pos~ in the
I hereby (ertltv "'nt enl.\ .S .. ....,..(..104,.. 'Wo Revised Cede.
I ., ,,' ",.,
City of 0""1'.. '.. . '.
--....---
"'..,..----'_",-"<,""!"".,.,".,'~..j.___'_,,'_"...~.._..;..;..,......<.. ,-..,.,""-;r-',..,,__.,._....".".__.e;"_",.....:_'..""".......,;,,;~~''''''''<----',,...;o--;"..",.~.''''',',.>_.._,__"._,,~..v''''-..,~''''',.'''''',.,_'''-*'..,..
-= - - i tX:h;b"r~-.
~"7~ ..... ~ ~_ .... IL,..., ~ "-:
~..../... ~ ltAl~\ r- I TULLER RD ~ TULLER RD ,
Z ("l ,. ~
o _
~ 8 ~
, 2 TVlP ~ '7
l ; D '~~
- ""'. '. ; ~'-.-f I - ..r-.~." :
q ~~1tu. - -, ~ r ~ ..' ., ~\l" ~ i
... ~ ..l.....---, ,I ';;..Il ~ .
,./ Ii II DALE DR 1 ~ -, '.:
~ .f: h l\r " Ii! ~
Ir'B LlBRARY~r~~ S:> ~ I
" DO.. ~ C!i ;; I I
. . 16' ):=
O a= I l = n:sr DUBlJH G~ Rn ~ DR !
· · IX'" II BW<EFORD '" '''" . .
,., >oj ~ . <<.j ~ ."
",Q ~ ~ "- lIARTIII JL , .,. I ~. I
~ a r.r, ~ PL STONERIDGE 3 _","
1i!!. - ~- '!1. "s, I , ' -( r-. uu. Y -lIAR CT LN,..
. .,.,.- - I 0 ~ 'ii ,\ · /"" ....'r' ..._. ~. tJ I
f' O/J) I \~ !I ~l ;:> .r z.. ~ \~I,~ ~:
· I tN ~ ,~ -"" \ 07 CT CIi.tRi' MARTIN ROAD ~ I r--=:::::
. I" ~ 1\ 1~1=----___________.____.
I WA -... ~~ "" I~ ~! ~):jA..lf ' ~ ~,'
~ \~I ~ 1 '\. l' ~. Ci ~
AlARlON':: ST I ~ j # r r \""'-1 ~ . \. - D I ~ ..
' 'J! j . ~ ^ ~ 'z-
'" l~.. ~ . .,;g
:> I;()"G~ DR Z' ~I J I @J 6: L- ~ _ - .~,
...o;RANDvD;., DR , \T
- f<;
--- j ~ D, ,
r- '" \ '1 I I ~ _ .
Iii,. I 'lf1> . .
T\v'P t: /- ~ f - -'~ ~ j , . I .. .
'" / 1- . '_
I \.k' _.
~ I . - ' / -~ c '\ .. .'.
" , . p- ~
- - -~ , , \ r ~ ~ I c'f
",;(A211 "Ita >-3' \ \ ' \. "'-".,." _ H . .' .
"!I! 3~!3 If'.. I ~ . . , ~ 1.1,' #">iO , .... _ 0=;' ','
- :;):;). JI .-:.' , .~. ,# ... - . V-l
!;i ,. 00 . . ..... .' . . I,
~l --9~~:ziJ .. '-Ill.. -.( ..~J' -.~r...;..-~ tJ . _.. . . _.. ....,~." "'. __: I.:_~:_'; _ ..
~ '. 1 . . . . . ..~~. , . _...
~ f~. ., .',,_
-u.. _ . _ _'. '" ,
- R l ' ,,--.;.,,_ ~ .' '_:". . _ ~ ~,.
./ <,. ., .,-.: -:.., "'. -: . ~.. ---
-Z~ - ~~~' "-," .... .... Ordinance No. 22-95
J'j '~~, r\' .. ,- ,Z95-005 ~
~'B~ 1 E ~ \:\ \ ~Gi _ ; ',..',r d:'- I Martin Commons
fu> ~f~r; ~~~, _
'+jr!,
J ~'
, ? L Fl \-'.. " ' - . -:-. . ~
-,i -1, ~ ). .- PUD_ -l'
~ 4 (~UD I
'R-2~ I
~ _1
_ R-IJ/~~,:i. -- I
'1Jt) '~r1, \ ~ \ \ /' . I
, ; ~ R" R-1 1 I
- I li ? U ~ ~ \, I I .- ' !
, \~ \ --.... i I I It,ll
i \ I '.~ . ~ t.;.
?YO' . ~ '1'- ~\ \ ~. ?LR
\\ I I ~ \.
i ..t
:1 I
\1 ' ~
JO I, I R-I;
PUD
...,
r--
~
, 4
: 1
pcr \ U
-\ 'I
l I
\ \
\ -=~
\ I
I \
, I '
\ RI i \
\ '
;..--, I - - --
, r - -, -.- \
r , · 'S E-
- I RJl - . ^
RI-~" i P'J1 IT p u 0 oIIf
.- ~ l-r-j-
R '
I
~ i
I
-- I
1_._
Ordinance No. 22-95
Z95-005 ~-1\
____. Martin Commons f'J ~
....
!" .'" ~ .7<- h " &/t- .-B
'.
.
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNINC AND ZONING COMMISSION
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF TilE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONlNG Application No:
DISTRICT MAP ZM 711 S- - Db <)
(Reclassification of Land) Date Filed: -S - ~ li' .9 ~ 5""
Fee Receipt No. s8<1 S-
r Received by: E'.. \..GJYYI~
, '
-
Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Applicant T & R Properties
being the owner(s),/lessee(s) of property located within the area proposed for
Martin Commons requests ~hat the following
,
described land to be placed in the PUD
.
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of
,
~
a recorded plat, with an area of .
- b. Beginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimension
of from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
'""
. "\
c. The tract of land containing Acres and bounded by:
(specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
(specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
(specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
..- (specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
G Attached legal description: YES / NO
-
Page 1 of 4
~<>-'---'--_.'-~'"'~,,,, ~
.. .. J.Jf/j
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8~ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
,.... To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
I other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
I fully dimensioned.
--
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
-----
(See Attached Sheet)
.....
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND
- 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: 62 unit residential
development
with multi-family and sinqle family detached housinq. .
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and Exhibits submitted
Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan X ; Sketch ;
- - --
Photographs - ; Other site analysis, site context (spec ify)
aeri a 1 photoqraph, landscape buffer details, perspective sketch~ and
2. preliminary utility plan.
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
JIIl':"I<'SOl and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
(See Development Text)
-
Page 2 of 4
l . '. . .
-
.
3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
YES
NO X
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
".....
I
-.
C. AFFIDAVIT
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
I (we) P,1SOt"ln.ld ScJcn:t1vlO H-es',AevJ ~ ~R. Prop~e..s ~,
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included
in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
lIlF""" --~< the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and-that the statements
and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief.
~ (Y.
T & R Properties
6563 Worthington-Galena Road
Worthington, Ohio 43085
(Mailing address)
(614) 436-0000
(Phone)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~~ day of ~ , 19;'(5":
. IIMIllY 10 McMAHON ~~1?k~~
· ..., PI8JC. JWE OF OHIO
~ M a 'MY COIIIISSION EXPIIES JANUARY 1& 1999 (notar Pu lie)
~ Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory:
~... (Name (Address) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ( - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Do not write below this line) - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn Held to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Mod if ied
3. City Council: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
P:::lf'"P ':; !"If l'I
, . . \ '" ~
. .
The applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
request for PUD by the Dublin Planning and
Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee
or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential
IIIt'"'"
services such as water and sewer facilities when needed hy said applicant.
....... The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest
Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services
to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part
of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
tJvurc.h a~ Iqq~ " (fLJ \~
I
Date Signature of Applicant or authorized
representative thereof.
IJIII!".;.... On 1y~nf: @, ~
Applicnnt ~
--
JII't,.,~:!
........
Page 4 of 4
_^ ..u~
" I, NeR 27 ' 95 13: 43 HOCl<ADEN Al'm A:3S0C P.2/4
..
MARTIN ROAD PROPERTY
ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES
A) PHELE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
4051 WEST DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD
DUBLIN OR 43017
B) DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION
c/O EUGENE MATAN
261 SOUTH FRONT STREET
,... COLUMBUS OR 43215
..... C) GERMAIN PROPERTIES OF COLUMBUS, INC.
5777 SCARBOROUGH BOULEVARD
COLUMBUS OH 43228
D) CHURCH OF CHRIST ON MARTIN ROAD
c/o PLAZA PROPERTIES
P.O. BOX 09601
COLUMBUS OR 43209
E) DANIEL F. & FRANCIS L. HUNTER
2964 MARTIN ROAD
DUBLIN OH 43017
F) OHIO TEACHERS RETIREMENT
c/o STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT
BOARD OF OHrO RETIREMENT DEPARTMENT
275 EAST BROAD STREET
COLUMBUS OB 43215
G) THRIFTY DELTA, INC.
c/o MEIJER REALTY COMPANY
2929 WALKER AVENUE NW
GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504
....
H) ALA & AYSER HAMOUDI
3125 LILLY-MAR COURT
DUBLIN OH 43017
-
I) ANDREAS & DARA SCHUSTER
c/o TRANS AMERICAN REAL ESTATE
P.O. BOX 267108
COLUMBUS OR 43229
J) T " R PROPERTIES
6563 WORTHINGTON GALENA ROAD
WORTHINGTON OH 43085
1<) DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION '....
C/O EUGENE MATAN ll.
261 SOUTH FRONT STREET
COLUMBUS OH 43215
L) BORROR CORPORATION
5501 FRANTZ ROAD
P.O. BOX 7166
DUBLIN OH 43017
.......
-
- -
~~-~ := ~::. ~~- ~ '1'llLLER RD ~ TUU.EIl RD::::;;:" i
. '" ~\ I "i !
o 0
- ~ 8 .~
· ~ TwP i ~
::I: ~
~ ~
~ U, ...r- C!
I ~'- . .# 'If'
""Vv -I-~~r ~ .... T~ ~l' ~~
1./ . 0 ~ \~\~DAIE DR ~ . ~ ~:, ;~
lmRARY ~ .\W, ~ ~ ~I
GH RD ~ ~' cg a
' 161 "':::
. Il. ~ !1sT DUBUN G&!mw; lID ~ DR'=
- r"'" · ~ II ~~RD 'j , i.
=[fa: ,. l\ \: . ff ~
ZR Q ~ ~ ,~
i... ,.l. PL STONERlDGE ,15. ~
- ..... i' '"I /JU.y -1Wl cr III
a .. ~. . r,. "-', , , . >
- C'I' ~1'l0 ~ /"' _ ,_ u
: ou) ft. II ll"::; .r ZA . '"'-- ~ l~I,J;;:_ ~ :
~ ) n -!1\\ cr CIi.tRi' . MARTIN ROAD "..- . 1 ~
' ~ ~. \ .~.;.,-------------- "----.....,. I.. ,
'lr~ \ 1 n ~ zA... . ... c: . 0 .
"",I~un: .:"Y"rr, I.. I JI. 0...---- ~ . R . '. '.. .~.'. ......
~ ~ I . I \. '. E. .
\ ~ (11 i'\ I 1 \. b . U . ,gj !:!{
IiAllION' ST j ~ 'J I , I Ci ~ . ^ ~[) lei .;:-_
: fX). 1ft . ~ ..' Il
:toRcl7ft'ir DR .L ~ ~ , ~ 6:' (f ~ \\ t_~
-=::.. - 331 . ~ \\ _
GIlAHDvJ! W DR J . '--' ""'" ~
- ----'- f a J~) /' ,
'" \"1 ~~.K ~ .
TwP l / ~ (.~ -k=- ~ . I . L. .
/g I -:-. 1 . .... ~. '. ".
- - L- I . 1 ~ (~
~ .,,= r~31 \ \ \ \, "'- u _ .'
~I ;!!m~..' ~.' ~ f...l, A"\; , ..' .
l:: ~~' J' .'. .~..# ~. . U 'l ~. '
{:; '" 00 '. ". '- . _ . :... .
"" Jj :;''''1- .."" /) . J' (J ~...., . ....~A,!: . _': .' :::~"
Yl:QnuJC -- ~ . . c. ' '. '. . . '. .
~R "'.. _.' _ .'
,..~ ~ . ~. ,- "iJ... -' J ~ ncation
~ l.- '. ~. . RezonmgApp
':---..1 .,,..... 5-005 t
'J.. '" - . ... -' - ". . 7J) 'opment
~. !!Il::.. _ . Preliminary ))eye.
' "~~ 1! ~ \ .1(. Martin Commons
Bas, \\" I
I ~~ ~ ~ '.\ ~
LD cr~.,.~_~ ;po~
-- --
u - ~-
I
- '- I,
-~ ---l
~--~-V' PUD _
-- I ':
-- 9
- .
PLR .. -
I
( I,
,,-- I
I , !
f i
--': .,
1
Ll
)
,
\ \
\
.
- -
I ~
I
i -
I
J
----
~
------
'-"'~-----_......". ------. '-- - _..---~-'-_.."._"- ...""'- . '---_..~ -_.--'-'-''''-._--
MARTIN COMl\10NS . .
A PROJECT OF: T & R PROPERTIES
PUD DEVELOPMENT TEXT
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. North Point & Scale: See drawing.
B. The proposed location and size of areas of residential use, indicating dwelling unit
.....
densities, dwelling unit types, the total number of dwelling units for each density
area, and the total number of dwelling units proposed in the development plan.
~-...~
The proposed PUD contains 9.9 acres. The total use of the property will be
residential with a total of 62 units. The proposed residential units will be a mixture
of 28 attached ranch style condominiums (these units are contained in four unit one
story buildings located on the western portion of the property) and single family
detached two story condominiums located on the eastern edge of the property.
There will be 34 of the single family unit type. These units will be designed in the
traditional style and will contain "front doors" looking on public space and two car
attached garages along the back.
The overall acreage contains 9.9 acres with approximately .6 ares to be dedicated
in Martin Road ROW leaving a net of 9.3 acres. Total units will be 62 for a net
density of 6.67 du/ac.
C. The proposed size, location and use of nonresidential portions of the tract, including
usable open areas, parks, playgrounds, school sites and other public areas and open
spaces with the suggested ownership of such areas.
Three areas have been set aside for public open space. The "Commons" containing
.7 acres located on the eastern portion of the site. The single family condominiums
will front on the "Commons". Major existing trees will be preserved within this ...,
common area.
The second open space area will be along Martin Road and our entry road and will ..,....
collectively contain another .47 acres. This open space has been created in an
effort to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible and create open space
along the roads.
The third open space is located along our western border and contains..:t.. 1.0 acres.
This is created by a 70' setback from our western border and will include buffering
between this development and the adjacent single family homes.
We are proposing that all common open space will be owned and controlled by the
Owner's Association. The Applicant is proposing that shortages of the required
open space be made up by "fee in lieu of" payments per Section 1109.02 of the
Dublin Zoning Code.
. ,
, ....
. ,
----~_._-_._- - -,----
. .
'oN ~OA'3^~ns Q)ll3lS~3~ ~
AS "':t IV N
0111))10 NlJ.WO .
__ _ SUYll CI3SVoJIlI OUt - I ~1""""S
Si/]3NON] ONlJ.':ItlSNO:l ' ..' .:l Yo,J
'ONI '531. VIOOSSV ONV N30V>r.>OH ,>>. U . I ,31 YO
....-.....
,... I..a.
1 1. R....,..~~
nY:lIl :lIIIcMlD
-
lN3l'OlIlL3W SlGDY11 OlHO
VJ~V re' N)""""'S3!QV tro'.1
" ..... J.J..IllIttl "n__d~ tIO*>s :iIu
... --
__ ~;a --. --
_ _ 0Y01I - iii .oo.oc;r H -
- '1Y:l!r" _ - ...
OHINHE:,e .:D~
z
i
AN't'cI/'Cl~ S~ri ~~~: HUWV" ..: :1
! .~
B: ~'"
. l<I
=~
ea
I ~.
tO~Oyg ~~~WI-D
(1Y JOll S3lI:W t;a't I "tV
AtN dl'OO ONV'l ""0" N:lQl()
''Y' .. Wllv,..
",.
, - I;~-nif"~~
~l ~
ifl I~~ )HD~~~~J'd~" " J.N3~~~
"! I .10 J.N3IlU:lYcBCl
6 I
1181HX3 ~NINOZ
to'H'O-Z;Z tl9 llOJ 6U:C+ 01HO 'Snsl'fn"lO:) t660-Z.Z tl8 .lIOlIcI
31\N3^V AOVSSV:l 'N t'88
. SH3)NI::>N3 ::>N\L 1nsNQ:)
" '~NI '531 VIOOSSV' ONY N30V>iOOH
,,,.'., ....~ IlII"4 ll"l'ltof~-."'" f'1" :~T ~.. ,"-:: ""',I . .. .
. . - .--- -
. <. . -, .-
.~ '. --,
. ., '.
-"'- -- - ---- --- '. -,.- ---", - ,- .~
-' .. ,--- . --
- - - _L. ----.--,---------------'----- .-
. ,
:
. MAR 27 ' 95 13: 43 HOCKADEN A/'ID ASSOC .. , P.3/4
,
.'
DESCRIPTION OF 9~a93 ACRE TRACT
NORTH OF ~~~TrN ROAD
WEST OF SA~MILL ROAD -
SOUTH OF STONERIOGE L&~E /
Situated in the State of Ohio, Count.y of Franklin, City 0: ....,.-
Dublin, Quarter Township 3, Township 2, Range 19, United States :1
Military Lands, and bei~g a part of a 1~.Sl5 acre tract conveyed to
Martin Road Land Company of record in O.R. 13506 J17 thru O.R.13507 I
}.O6 (all deed references refer to the records in the Recorder's i
Of:i.ce; Franklin, County, Ohio) and described as follows:
.Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said 14.815 acre
tract in the centerl~ne with the ' , line 0: Sunny D-'o:.
eas~er-y c:t__
Estates exter.ded as the same is shown of rec'=lrd in ?lat Sook 24,
Page 110;
Thence North 6025'45" East a distance of 453.66 feet, along
the easterly line of said sunny Dale Estates, to a. point;
Thenc.; South 85036146" East a distance of 858.47 f~.;t to a
point on the easterly line of said 14.815 acre tract a~d westerly
property line of Dan!~l - Jr. and Frances L. Hunte: 1.03 acre
= .
tract;
Thence $'0 u t h 6019'17" West a dis~ance 0-: 510.32 feet, along
th~ weste:ly line of said Hunter, to a ~oint in the cente=li~~ 0:
said Martin Road; -;
i
i
Thence North 8~030'OO" West a distance of 859.00 ~ ' along
...ee!:,
the ~ ,. of said Martin Road, to the r?oir.t 0: Se~inning -'
cen..er.lne
~onta!ning 9.893 acres more or less.
This description was pre~ared by Hockaden and }...s S oc i at es ,
Inc., ColumbUS, Ohio from existing records for zoning purposes only
and not from an actual field survey.
pr el?ar ed : March 24, 1995
40347032495Fl
-
,
: , MAR 27 '95 13: 43 HO:KADEN AND ASSQC P.2/4
HARTIH ROAD PROPERTY
ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES
A) PHELE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
4051 WEST DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD
DUBLIN OH 43017
B) DEPARTMENT OP MEDICINE FOUNDATION
c/Q EUGENE MATAN
261 SOUTH'FRONT STREET
COLUMBUS OB 43215
C) GERMAIN PROPERTIES OF COLUMBUS, INC.
5777 SCARBOROUGH BOULEVARD
,.., COLUMBUS OB 43228
I! D) CHURCH OF CHRIST ON MARTIN ROAD
-- c/Q PLAZA PROPERTIES
P.O. BOX 09601
COLUMBUS OH 43209
E) DANIEL P. & FRANCIS L. HUNTER
2964 HARTIN ROAD
DUBLIN OB 43017
F) OHIO TEACHERS RETIREMENT
C/o STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT
BOARD OF OHIO RETIREMENT DEPARTMENT
275 EAST BROAD STREE'!'
COLUMBUS OB 43215
G) THRIFTY DELTA, INC.
c/o MEIJER REALTY COMPANY
2929 WALKER AVENUE NW
. GRAND RAPIDS MI 49504
H) ALA , AYSER HAMOUDI
3125 LILLY-MAR COURT
DUBLINOH 43017
I) ANDREAS & DARA SCHUSTER
c/O TRANS AMERICAN REAL ESTATE
P.O. BOX 267108
COLUMBUS OH 43229
J) T , R PROPERTIES
... 6563 WORTHINGTON GALENA ROAD
WORTHINGTON OH 43085
- 1<) DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION ..,
0/0 EUGENE HATAN '.
261 SOUTH FRONT STREET
COLUMBUS OH 43215
L) BORROR CORPORATION
5501 FRANTZ ROAD
P.O. BOX 7166
DUBLIN OH 43017
, .
,.(
," ' ..
, ,
...
w ""~~~,,,~,--,-~----,-'-'-'--~-".~-~~""""~'-'."
Minutes of Meeting, January 4, 1990
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 13
Mr. Geese asked about the developer's intention for the vacant homes on this
site along Martin Road. Mr. Jones stated that they could possibly be
condemned. Mr. Deno Curos, the applicant, stated that he has permission to
level the houses upon approval of this project.
Discussion ensued about the construction of Stoneridge Lane, and Mr. Jones
explained that a condition of the Preliminary Plan approval was the completion
of the final section of Stoneridge Lane as part of the first phase, prior to
occupancy of this project. If for any reason the adjacent property owner
(JALL Investment) does not fulfill its commitment to build the road, this -
,
developer will be responsible for constructing it; not the City of Dublin. r
I
Mr. Curos noted that a bond was posted by JALL Investment to build its section -""'"
of Stoneridge Lane. The section to be built as part of the Stoneridge Medical
Center (owned by Mr. Curos) cannot be built until that construction takes
place. Mr. Willis agreed that JALL did post a bond for a section of
Stoneridge Lane with several conditions triggering construction. One of those
triggers was a two-year time period based on the development of the Golden
Bear store, however, that bond has been renewed. Another trigger is the
construction of the shopping center (Dublin Square) on the remaining portion
of the l2-acre JALL site. That Final Development Plan has-been approved, and
Mr. Willis stated that he has notified JALL Investments that the City expects
to have Stoneridge Lane under construction in the spring of 1990. Mr. Curos
explained that at time of zoning for this project, he gave up all rights to
access onto Martin Road and was assured by the City that a bond would be
posted by JALL so that Stoneridge Lane would be built by the time this project
was under construction. Mr. Curos stated that he only expects the City to
enforce that bond. Staff agreed to work on enforcing the bond.
Mr. Mack presented engineering comments as follows:
-Final location of emergency access to Martin Road to be designed subject to
Washington Township Fire Department and Dublin City Engineer specifications
and located to minimize visual compromise of the planned mounding and
vegetation.
-Primary driveway off of Stoneridge Lane to be in compliance with the Dublin
Code and should align with the drive on the north side of Stone ridge Lane. -
-Storm water control design subject to approval by the City Engineering Staff.
-
Mr. Duros presented a site plan and stated that this will be an up-scale
project with rents ranging from $650 to $800 per month.
Mr. Buck Withers of Withers Associates Inc. Architects presented several plan boards:
-Demonstrated overall site plan showing phasing of the project, landscaped
entrance feature, building features including 20 carports, outdoor amenities,
satellite dish location, landscaped buffer zone and powerline easement.
-Color and material palette similar to Stoneridge Medical Center with the
addition of stucco. Main facades to be of stone and cedar.
-Mr. Withers agreed to additional landscape plantings as requested by Staff.
Mr. AmorQse agreed that this proposal is an appropriate use of the site. Mr.
Withers responded to Mr. Amorose that the height of this building is comparable
to the Arbors of Dublin apartment complex in Columbus across Martin Road. Mr.
Amorose also received clarification tha~ Captain John Sedlock of the
Washington Township Fire Department does all plan reviews for the City of
Dublin. Mr. Amorose noted concern about several of the plant materials shown
on the landscape plan. He suggested that Staff advise the developers to use
more hardy plant materials and requested that these materials be changed on
this plan. Rezoning Application. -z,\~
Z9S-005
Preliminarv Develonment Phm -
Minutes of Meeting, January 4, 1990
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 14
Mr. Leffler asked why the assisted-care living units had been eliminated from
the plan. Mr. Duros stated that implementation of the plan has taken
approximately four years, and more recent market studies show that this area
is saturated with assisted-care units, and independent living units designed
especially for the older population are in demand. Mr. Duros stated that the
lease will stipul~te that the primary leaseholder must be at least 55 years of
age.
In response, to a question from Ms. Rausch, Mr. Withers replied that the common
.... dining room has been eliminated from this plan, and the staff has been
significantly reduced.
-
Mr. Berlin moved to approve th~ Final Development Plan with several conditions
as follows:
1) The rive parallel parking spaces along Martin Road to be eliminated;
2) A walkway connection to Martin Road at. the' 'southeast . corner .of the project
to be added;
3) Additional deciduous shade trees to be added along Martin Road and along
the eastern property line, and additional evergreen trees be added to the
western landscape buffer to satisfaction of Staff;
4) Emergency access along Martin Road to be coordinated with Fire Department,
Engineering and Planning Staff for mutual approval and determination of
final location and number of private fire hydrants, to satisfaction of
Fire Department;
5) Curb cut/entrance drive to be resolved to satisfaction of Engineering and
Planning Staff;
6) Primary leaseholder of each living unit to be at least 55 years of age;
and
7) Engineering comments from Staff Report.
The applicant agreed with the conditions. He stated his understanding that
the City will not be responsible for constructing Stoneridge Lane but that it
will attempt to enforce the bond held for construction of that roadway.
.....
Mr. Manus seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Manus, yes;
- Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr.
Campbell, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes. (Approved 7 -0)
6. Co(ie Revisions Pl;tnn;ng and ZOning Code - one
Regu1ations
Ms. Kurtz presented revisions Regulat' ns,
of the Planning and ning Code, as outlined in the Staff Report dated J uary
4, 1990. This area of the Code consists of a defi ition section, requi ements
for preliminary an final platting, and developme t procedures for
subdivisions and lanned districts. Final revis'ons will require app oval by
the Planning an Zoning Commission and by City ounci!.
Mr. Geese exp essed concern about utilizatio dedicated for storm
water retent on purposes. Mr. Berlin was n agreement that t Code
should pro bit storm water retention as of the parkland de cation.
Discussio ensued about the intent of th open space dedication equirement,
and Mr. ampbell suggested that the Sta come up with' RezOning Application
elimin e the open space dedication fr being used for Z9S-00S ~\3
Amoro requested specifications from e Engineering D P Ii' Development
rete ion/detention basins. Ms. Cat erin Headlee noted re ~ll1nary
Martin Commons
- l:r;rlnrv
.
i RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page IS Meeting
-
Heln September 20, 1993 19
-
continue to do so. He requests notification ahead of time so that he can make arrangements to attend
the meeting.
...... Mr. Kranstuber moved to approve the concept plan with the conditions of Planning &. Zoning.
. Mayor Rozanski seconded the motion.
~
'Mrs. King moved to add an additional condition 110, that one story buildings adjoin the w.estem
border.
-
Discussion followed about the message being sent to the developer with a positive vote on the plan,
in consideration of the many issues raised tonight, including the unacceptable density and the traffic
problems.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that if a condition were appended on'the two story buildings, then
. perhaps conditions should be added to address the other issues;raised tonight. All oCthe comments
made tonight are a part of the record and can. be Incorporated Into the plan by' the developer.
. .
More discussion followed. ..
Mr. Foegler commented that since there are many issues to be resolved, the developer may save . .
mor.e money and do a more. cost-effective job of attaining an approval by bringing back another
concept. If he is willing to talce the risk and go to the next step, investing more money into the
preliminary plan, he does so at his own risk. The Council has certainly made their thoughts clear
on the subject.
Mr. Shannon commented that he has no delusions that the developer is remotely close to what
!- Council wants.
i Mrs. King withdrew her motion to amend the conditions.
i
Vote on the motion to approve the concept plan - Mr. Strip, no; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes;
Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes.
...
......
.....
Mr. F~ler commented that ecity has been contacted by Safety Solutions,' Inc. garding
relocation to Dublin. Staff xploring a Tax Increment Financing arrangement in co . nction with
this. The proposed site on Shamrock Court, but part of the problem is that h of it is private
and needs to be made blic. Legislation will likely be brought to Council wi an the next month.
Mr. Foegler also n eel that the city has received an inquiry regarding av. ability of water to a
business on Irela lace, off of Avery Road south of Shier Rings. If Co iI bas no objection, staff
will conduct a rvey of the businesses in the area to see if there is a and a desire to participate
in such a pr ect. Staff will initiate the survey this week. Council 111 receive a report back within
a month.
reported tbat the deadline for submission of tax applications was last Wednesday. ..
~'.
has received five applications and they will be fo arded to the Finance Committee.
e process is now beginning to compile the ope ng budget. Staff hopes to bring a tentative
recommended timeline for adoption of the 1994 get to the next Council meeting.
Mr. Amorose noted that the Dublin Arts Coun . has contacted him to request an extension for their
application -It will be forwarded within the ext 14 days. He has notified Mr. Strip ofthisrequ
Mr. Fnefler also reported that Counc' as been given a copy of the EPA's formal modlfi
and findinp which incorporate th hanges discussed reducing the required rate of inn from 3
to I to 2 to I and also defer th etention basin an additional year. Staff Is hopeful at the West ezomng APPllcau.Or
Branch Interceptor is under tract by that time.
Regarding Danbert Cons ction, discusSed earlier this evening, Mr. Foegler r Z9S-OOS d( ct
was the contractor for one of the phases of the Avery Road project In conj Preliminary Development
Hospital and Perimeter Center. Martin Commons
n:cwf-n..., .--
Minutes of Meeting, January 4, 1990
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 12
5. Final Development Plan - Martin Road Retirement Center - Stoneridge Village
Mr. Jones presented slides of the site and surrounding area along with
information contained in the Staff Report dated January 4, 1990.
-The subject site is 10.09 acres representing Phase I of a 14.82 acre site
zoned PUD, Planned unit Development District, known as Stoneridge Village.
The approved uses are a retirement center and three condominium office
buildings. The site is located to the south of the yet-to-be-completed
Stoneridge Lane and north of Martin Road, approximately 1,100 feet west of
,.. Sawmill Road. An overhead high-voltage electric power line runs north/south
through the western portion of the site.
-The Preliminary Plan for this project was approved January 12, 1989, with
- four conditions. The applicant is now requesting approval of a Final
Development Plan for the retirement center which includes the entrance drive
from Stoneridge Lane and the entire landscaped buffer along the western
portion of the property. This project will offer an active retirement
lifestyle within walking distance to goods and services and will provide
on-site recreational amenities.
-There are several changes proposed since the time of zoning that must be
addressed. The most significant change with this plan is-the change in use
from some assisted care units and living plan that included meals and
extensive services to all independent living units. The applicant is
proposing 165 units, each with a full kitchen, along with several common
amenities. The entire building is now to be three stories high and has
increased to 163,700 square feet (was 135,000 s.f.) ,largely due to the
addition of a complete kitchen in each unit. This change increases the
parking requirement to two spaces per unit; however, Staff is comfortable with
a one and one-half per unit ratio based upon all the units being occupied by
retirement age people. The plan shows 1.37 spaces per unit with additional
areas indicated for parking, if needed, to bring the ratio up to 1.54 spaces
per unit. The overall parking issue can be addressed further when the
condominium offices are submitted for Final Development Plan.
-The open space requirement will be fulfilled with the provision of private
facilities and includes a variety of outdoor activities and fitness options
,..,. concentrated on the western three acres of the site. Although these facilities
will be privately maintained, the applicant intends to allow the local
residents to utilize the outdoor amenities.
- -The majority of the building's roof line will be 34-36 feet high, with the
highest central portion being approximately 41 feet high. The building materials
are stone veneer and cedar clapboard siding with sOme 'smaller section of stucco.
The trim is cedar, and the roofing is asphalt shingle. The colors are warm grays
with a weathered wood-colored shingle and bronze painted aluminum doors and windows.
-Mechanical units will either be wall louvers painted to match the clapboard
siding or located on the recessed flat-roof section and screened by peaked
roofs that serve as parapets.
-The site lighting is all shoe-box type, complete cut-off fixtures, and no
light or glare will trespass beyond the property boundaries.
-Staff is recommending approval of this project with several conditions. Mr.
Jones also noted that the City of Dublin will in no way be responsible for the
construction of Stoneridge lane for access to this site.
Mr. Leffler questioned the timing for completion of Stoneridge Lane. Mr.
Bowman explained that for this project to go forward, Stoneridge Lane must be
built from the western edge of the Stoneridge medical office pUil~a~~~
to the veterinary site. P~~~AppliC: on
Z9~S ,l~
Preliminary Development
Martin Commons
... TT! _.... _ ____
~,~--'"-
:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13 Meeti~g
--- 1!t!nc2ff_.I.~~r~~-~~,_
He]rl September 20, 1993 19
=- - . ..-.,.-...-..- --.-- -,.,_. --- ------ - ~._- -,--- -.--.- -- -- - ..- -- -_... --
100 percent of the requirements for parkland.
Mrs. King asked what contribution this developer will make toward the infrastructure of the city.
Ms. Fierce responded that this has not been addressed at the concept stage, but staff will likely
request sidewalk and bikeway Improvements and possibly a left turn Jane on Martin Road. --
Mrs. King also noted that one factor used in evaluation of the proposal is -the density of the Arbors
of Dublin, but the Arbors is actually located in Columbus. It is not appropriate to consider this as
a factor In deciding density for another municipality. --
Mrs. King does believe that it is appropriate to provide some kind of senior housing, but she is not
comfortable with this level of density.
Mrs. King is appreciative that stormwater issues are addressed with the Plan, although it should not
be Included in parkland calculation. She has concerns that the Lochmuir concept plan did not show ..
any stormwater detention facility which could result in accelerated runoff.
Mr. Strip wonders why senior housing would justify a greater density. Is it because higher density
translates into lower cost of housing? He believes this needs further analysis.
Mr. Foegler responded that it depends on how senior housing is defined, I.e., what age group. .-
Generally, the average age of residents in retirement centers is the late 70's. A high level of care
center Wouid result in less vehicles per unit, less traffic per unit, less children. Thus a case can be
made for less impact on the immediate surrounding areas. The plan being considered tonight cannot
be clearly categorized as a senior category of congregate care or assisted-type living facility to
warrant special considerations.
Mr. Campbell's principal concerns with the plan are the density and the fact that Martin Road has
been a constant source of traffic difficulties, whether real or perceived. The plan must be creative
in design to keep traffic away from Martin Road. An important consideration must be not to place
_. any additional burden on an already overloaded Martin Road. Steps must be taken in the
engineering design to discourage using Martin Road as the access to this project.
;
.
Mike Shannon of Thomnson. Hine and Flory stated that he represents the applicant, T & R
Properties in this rezoning. He apologized to area residents who were informed that the meeting
would begin at 7 p.m. They have worked with area residents and civic groups to try to improve on
the existing PUD. He pointed out that: - -
I. The project has been taken back by a ban:'. The senior housing was not marketable for a , ......'
number-of reasons. The existing PUD approved in 1989 has four acres of commercial and
the remaining 10 acreS for senior housing. Eliminating 4 acres of commercial, particularly
that which abuts the neighboring residences, was a plus. ........
2. The existing PUD called for 165 units on 10 acres and contained a more generous green
space commitment. The selling point of that PUD -was that there was no access on Martin
Road.
3. Current fair housing regulations prohibit limiting rentals to one population group suchas-:
seniors. Lending institutions are not prone to lend money for projects geared for one
segment of the population.
4. There are two elements: multi-family or apartment and condominiums. The 32 condo units
are handicapped-accessible.
5. Recreation amenities provided include horseshoe pits, shuffleboard, bocce.
6. A 100-foot powerline easement and powerline runs right through the site, taking up more
than 1-1/2 acres. Strucnires caMOt be built under those lines. -
7. They will be maleing changes to the park proposal which is currently not acceptable.
,_. 8. The traffic study now completed supports access from Martin Road. The preliminary
I stumbling block to eliminating the Martin Road access Is the fact that Stoneridge Lane Is not
completed. He does not know when, If ever, It will be completed.
9. They are willing to work out pedestrian access and they have been requested to provide a
comprehensive recreational land use plan.
10. The Arbors of Dublin development to the south, though located in Columbus, has a density
of 15 units per acre. This does affect the value and proposed use of the property under
discussion. The developer Is proposing a reduction in density from the 1989 PUD of 16.5
down to 10.8.
11. The develoW Is now aware that there are many Issues to he worlced out, but they are ' -
ezomng AppJ1canon \
making a good faith effort to work with the neighbors In the area. Z95-00S 1 ~
Discussion followed about the density issue. Preliminary Development
- - .' ,... - --- -- ---
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14 Meeting
. ---.
He)tf September 20, 1993 19
is convinced that there are legitimate reasons Dn1 to allow access on Martin Road.
Mr. Shannon agreed to provide their study to staff.
Mr. Foegler commented regarding the Stoneridge Drive completion. As part of the 5-year capital
budget being compiled, staff is considering recommending inclusion of this project to Council
pending a private offer of construction if some right-of-way is secured. This could constitute a more
JIIIII 'appropriate access to the site without using Martin Road.
-- Mr. Amorose asked if the city has any traffic count figures on Martin Road, and how they would
compare with Tara Hill.
Mr. Shannon responded that they do.
Mr. Foegler sunnised that the figures for Martin Road would likely be higher as it plays the role
of a commercial collector and connects two major arterials.
Mr. Amorose commented that he believes this acreage could be developed ata low density, and
Improvements could be made to make Martin Road more similar to Tara Hill. With capital
Improvements on StoneridgeLane, he believes this area would be workable. Adding ,this type of
density on the site would not help the overall area. He added that he Is very opposed to this co~cept
plan with such a high density and little greenspace. "
,,'
Mayor Rozanski asked what is planned for the south side of Martin Road across from this site, just
west of the Arbors of Dublin.
Mr. Shannon stated that Mr. Meyer did a rezoning on that site to single family for the City of
Columbus with LR-2 zoning, 50 and 60 foot lots.
Mrs. King emphasized that she does not believe this applicant will receive approval for this density
at 10.
-
Mayor Rozanski stated that Council tonight is reviewing the concept in terms ,of land use.
Dr. Ala Hamoudi. 3125 Lilly Mar Court, located west of the proposed area, stated that he has two "
concerns: ' 1) the density is concentrated more on the west side of the plan than on the east side; 2)
he is opposed to tw~story buildings since Lilly Mar is completely one-story buildings. He has
traffic counts which he would like to present to the developer, but he is not prepared to make this
presentation tonight. The traffic patterns on Martin Road have greatly changed since the Meijer ..
store opened. He believes the traffic numbers will double on Martin Road.
""..
Joyce Beilharz. 3100 Lilly Mar Court, stated that she is not opposed to development of this property,
but thought must be given to the entire area. She has lived, in this area for 13 years and has seen
- many changes. She believes the denSity is much too high.
Randy Roth. 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive President of the East Duhlin Civic Association, stated that:
1. Area residents are concerned that the development be compatible with theirs'in terms 'of not
having two story buildings.
2. Mr. Campbell, in his commeirts, addressed the concerns of many residents who were at the
meeting earlier in the evening but had to leave.
3. .He noted that accidents have recently Increased at the Intersection of Martin and Crier.
There is a problem in that area where sel'ior citizens have been disturbed by drunks who
have wandered into the area. There should, be a creative way to address traffic without
bringing it onto Martin Road.
~ ' 4. Residents had in 1989 supported a higher density because it was an assisted-care facility and
did not have access on Martin Road.
S. There are concerns with the single-family houses on the end road which are cut off. He
would like to see the developer purchase the properties In conjunction with this plan.
6. They have accepted R-8 in other areas, but prefer to have a mix of apartments with owner-
occupied facilities;
Jay Beilharz. Lilly Mar Court stated that he thought the developer was going to have a different
proposal for tonight's meeting - a proposal without two-story buildings adjacent to his backyard.
Mr. Shannon responded that what is being presented tonight is the same concept plan that was .Kezomng Apphcab.on
reviewed by P&Z. After tonight's meeting, suggestions will be Incorporated Into a preliminary Z9S-OOS el1'
development plan.
Mr. Beilharz stated that be moved to bis residence 13 years ago, and they had anticipated that Preliminary Development
Martin Commons
Council would help them retain the character of their residential area. He is hopeful that they will Historv
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - August 5, 1993
Page 13
Ms. Fierce said the Concept Plan is intended to indicate the proposed landuses, the openspace,
and the roadway systems in a very general format. If approved by the Planning Commission,
it will be forwarded to City Council and then the rezoning application will be filed by the
applicant. More detailed engineer work will then be done. This is a. non-binding review.
Mr. Fishman said the density should be less than 8 per acre. Two or three story buildings do
not attract seniors. He said the renderings looked like standard apartment buildings and do not
look like Dublin. Too much siding was being used, and he preferred more durable materials ......
such as brick or stone. The amount of ()penspace and park area. also concerned him.
-
Mr. Shannon said a traffic study had been done at the request of the City and if there could not
be an access off of Martin Road onto the north, they will try to do it. Forty-eight. of .the
apartments and 32 of the condominiums are going to be handicapped accessible.
Conditions #2-8 were. agreed to by Mr. Shannon for his applicant.
Mr. Sutphen repeated that this road must meet all of Dublin's criteria. He noted there was no
sidewalk or bike path shown. He said he would not vote for this.
Mr. Shannon said the pedestrian access was a good idea and they would work with Staff.
Mr. Manus complemented the developer for notifying the residents and agreeing to meet with
them.
Mr. Fishman moved that this Concept Plan be approved with the following nine conditions:
1) That the density not exceed eight dwelling units per acre;
2) That an adequate text be provided with coordinated architecture and compatible building
materials with the predominant material being brick or stone; -
3) That the lot coverage meet the Code requirement and not exceed 70 percent of the overall
area.; -
4) That vehicular access be studied further;
5) That the Landscaping Code be met with this project plus an appropriate buffer along the
west property line;
6) That the applicant provide an adequate pedestrian system within the development to the
satisfaction of Staff;
7) That an appropriate level of recreational space be provided to the satisfaction of Staff;
8) That the 30 feet from centerline on Martin Road be dedicated; and
9) That the roadway base, curbs, and gutters meet the City engineering standards.
Mr. Shannon understood that this was a non-binding vote.
Mr. Stuphen seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes;
Ms. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 6-0.)
Rezomng Apphcanon ~\c:t,
Z9S-OOS
Preliminary Development
Martin Commons .......
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ..
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12 Meeting
-= _. 1rii(~j!~L~~.
Helti September 20, 1993 19
..,..- ,-.. -- - --- __..,__. 0'0 -- --..
t the Muirfield Association stees reviewed the plans in July.
concerns included th Ikepath system, 9o-foot lots eeluding side-loaded garages, the f1
(J that the open space be co yed to the Association.
,.
"..
.- ~ ConceJ)t Plan - Martin Road PUD
Ms. Fierce showed slides and described the site and surrounding area. The subject site is
approximately 15 acres situated between Manin Road. and Stoneridge Lane 'which is under
construction. She noted the following:
- This site was before Council in 1989 when Council approved a concept plan fora 16S-unit
retirement center with three office condominiums, outdoor fitness areas andarnenities geared ' ..
to seniors. The density of that project was 16.5 units per acre. - "
- This proposal is for 160 multi-family units with an overall density of 10.8 dwelling units per
acre. It is geared toward senior housinr. but not limited to that group. The proposal
includes 128 apanment units as well as 32 (ondominiums. . .
- The previous proposal had access only along Stoneridge Lane. This proposal includes
somewhat of a direct link between Stoneridge Lane at the north through to Manin Road at
the south.
- The parkland for the site is shown as 2.1 acres, and the requirement is 3.7 acres. The
proposal includes a 1.1 acre site within the middle of the condominium development and a
1 acre ponion along the southwest corner of the site, including a retention pond. Staff has
,. serious concerns about the limitation of public park areas east of the Scioto. River and
believes additional amenities and a pedestrian circulation system is needed here.
t - Overall, staff believes multi-family use is appropriate as a transitional land use in the area.
Staff believes this site makes a prime, senior-type location, offering access to facilities used
by seniors.
- Planning.Commission heard this case on August 5, and many Manin Road residents attended
the meeting. They expressed concerns about traffic along Manin Road. The applicant
indicated that a traffic study was being commissioned to address the proposed access along " ...
Martin Road.
... Planning Commission recommended approval of the plan. with 9 conditions:
1. That the density not exceed eight dwelling units per acre;
2. That an adequate text be provided with coordinated architecture and compatible building
'- materials with the predominant material being brick or stone;
3. That the lot coverage meet the Code requirement and not exceed 70 percent of the overall
area;
4. That vehicular access be studied funher;
5. That the landscaping Code be met with this project, including an appropriate buffer along
the west property line;
6. That the applicant provide an adequate pedestrian system within the development to the
satisfaction of staff;
7. That an appropriate level of recreational space be provided to the satisfaction of staff;
8. That 30 feet from centerline on Manin Road be dedicated;
9. That the roadway base, curbs, and gutters meet the City engineering standards.
Ms. Jordan stated that discussions have taken place about the location of the detention basin on this
plan. Staff explained to the applicant that the space of the volumes that would be used for the
stomtwater capacity could not be figured into tbe calculations for the parkland. If it is marketed to
seniors, the site would need to be improved with amenities such as a putting green, etc.
There was also a concern. about the buffer between the residents to the west. Staff looked at the
possibility of bringing the parkland down the west side of the project to incorporate the bikepath.
Mr. Kranstuber asked for staff's recommendation on the density. ezonmg Appncanoil b ( "
Ms. Fierce stated that staff had recommended to P&Z that the density be reduced to the 8 dwelling
units per acre contained In the conditions. Z9S-00S
Mayor Rozanski asked about the requirements for parkland dedication. Preliminary Development
Staff'responded that the requirement would be 3.7 acres for the proposed density of 10.8 dwelling Martin Commons
, units per acre. Ms. Jordan commented that staff'is requesting that the plan be redesigned to meet HistOry
I,
I,
11M
"._,--",-~--,_-.._,,-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - August 5, 1993
Page 11
combination thereof. The roof material will be asphalt fiberglass shingles. The exterior colors
will be primarily earthtones. The proposal for this project includes an access road which
intersects Stoneridge Lane along the north and runs through the development, intersecting Martin
Road on the south. The setbacks will be 25 feet along the north and east property lines, 40 feet
along the west property line, and 30 feet along Martin Road. Staff believes there needs to be
a larger setback along Martin - Road that would be more consistent with the surrounding area.
~
The parkland for this development includes 2.1 acres divided into two separate areas; a 1.1 acre
portion within the middle of the condominium development, and a 1 acre portion along the -
, southwest corner of the site including a retention pond. The park requirement is 3.7 acres, and
Staff is concerned that public recreation areas are very limited on the east side of the river.
Staff believes that the - proposal needs additional amenities and a pedestrian circulation system
for access to Martin Road and the commercial area. .The.multi-family,use is appropriate in this
location. Staff would like to emphasize that this - makes one 'of .-the-:prime senior-type
development sites in Dublin. Staff does support the overall land use_but. cannot support the
density proposed for general housing. Staff could support a higher density, but only for a
seniors only development. Staff supports the plan with eight conditions:
1) That the density not exceed eight dwelling units per acre;
2) That an adequate text be provided with coordinated architecture and compatible building
materials;
3) That the lot coverage meet the Code requirement and not exceed 70 percent of the overall
area;
4) That vehicular access be relocated farther east along Martin Road;
5) Tharthe Landscaping Code be met with this project plus an appropriate buffer along the
west property line;
6) That the applicant provide an adequate pedestrian system within the development to the
satisfaction of Staff; ~\-
7) That an appropriate level of recreational space be provided to the satisfaction - of Staff;
and -
8) That the 30 feet from centerline (error in ,Staff Report - not 60 feet), on Martin Road be
dedicated.
Mrs. Stillwell asked about 0 the overhead power lines within the lOG-foot easement. Ms. Fierce
responded that said the restriction did not apply to parking but did apply to the building.
Mr. Sutphen asked if it was a private road throughout the entire development, and would it be
built to City standards so far as curbs, gutters, sidewalks. Ms. Fierce said it was private but
construction had not been addressed. Mr. Kindra said the details had not yet been received and
as they are submitted, they will be examined.
Mike Shannon, attorney representing the applicant, introduced Bill Drake, the project
coordinator, and Jim Olausen, the project engineer. He pointed out the differences between their
development and the existing PUD. They feel their development has less impact on the
surroundings by eliminating 4 acres of commercial zoning. The density for the existing PUD '
.Kezomng AppJ1catton ~ \ ~
Z9S-OOS
Preliminary Development
U~'rf-tft {'"'t^t't"'l'l'n^ft~
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - August 5, 1993
Page 12
is 16.5 units per acre in an institutional structure in excess of 35 feet high. The property is
currently owned by a bank. The proposed density is 10.8 units per acre. Their intention is to
market this property for seniors, but not exclusively. The amenities, horseshoe pits and
shuffleboard typically would not attract young urban professionals with children. Financially,
they cannot limit it to seniors. The concerns of the neighbors on the western perimeter have
been addressed with a 40-foot parking and building setback that would be maintained as a
greenspace. There is also proposed a privacy fence which is negotiable if more landscaping is
". . preferred. The developer sent notices to all residents inviting them to meet with him. Ten
responses were received to meet the Commission meeting. A larger commitment of parkland
- can be worked on with the Parks Department.
Mr. Drake presented renderings of the condominiums and apartments.
Mr. Shannon said the access has been changed. The current PUD has no curb cut or access off
of Martin Road, but it does it off of StoneridgeLane. 'A traffic.study~has,been commissioned
which will be provided by Gary Wilcox that will recommend accesstoiMartin Road.
Robert W. Ramp, 6401 Braxmar Place, said his main concern is the traffic on Martin Road.
Many cars exceed the speed limit of 25 MPH. A recent count showed 100 cars an hour using
Martin Road. He feels the plan is good but he is concerned about the outlet onto Martin Road.
He suggested that Stoneridge be connected to Marcy Lane to. relieve the Martin Road residents
from so much vehicular Meijer's traffic. He mentioned the pond retention and flooding.
Dan Hunter, a resident of the area, said he also was concerned with the traffic. He has counted
15-20 cars lined up at the stop sign. In the mornings, Krier Road is used to avoid traffic.
Harvey Daughtery, 2956 Martin Road, was interested in the access to the property. He is not
in favor of more traffic onto Martin Road. He would like the 50-foot setback.
~ Randy Roth, 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive, President of the East Dublin Civic Association, said
a creative way to connect Riverside Drive and Sawmill Road at Martin Road had never been
- designed. It is a real serious problem and this would make it much, worse. Residents who have
homes east of the power lines need to be treated fairly.
Chuck Calhoun, 3185 Martin Road, has seen the traffic pattern change in the past thirty-three
years tremendously. In spite of his calls and letters to the police department, they do not think
there is a problem with speed and volume of the traffic. The last traffic survey was run for only
a couple of days which does not pickup the amount of traffic during the weekends. He has
timed 8 to 10 cars per minute travelling Martin Road. He is .concerned about the children's
safety. All the 25 MPH signs have been removed except for one at the top of the road and one
at the bottom. Any access coming onto Martin Road should be seriously considered. The site
detention is a neighborhood concern as the Meijer's development cause serious flooding when
it opened. He feels the pond needs to restrict the flow better and hold it back.
Ms. Clarke said the detention pond was in Dublin and that Staff should inspect it again.
Kezomng Apphcanon 4-\~
Z95-00S
Preliminary Development
Martin Commons
R;dn_,
--~-_..... --~~,~.<.- . ~,.. ",,_'~"_'___~"~_=r"._~.'___.~~__~__
RECORD OF ACTION
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AUGUST S, 1993
"'-'. , ., ...,. - . '\
, '. . The Pianning and Zoning Commission took the following action on the application below at its
regular meeting: -
8. Concept Plan- Martin Road PUD - 2980-3110 Martin Road t".....-,.
Location: 14.815 acres located on the north side of Martin Road, approximately 1,000
feet to the west of Sawmill Road, and having frontage along the south side of (proposed)
Stoneridge Lane.
Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development (Martin Road Retirement Plan).
Request: Review and approval of revised Concept Plan under the PUD provisions of
Section 1181.07.
Proposed Use: 160 multi-family units in 20 buildings with 2.1 acres of open space.
Applicant: T&R Properties, c/o Michael T. Shannon, 10 West Broad Street, Columbus,
OH 43215-3435.
MOnON: To approve this Concept Plan with the following nine conditions:
1) That the density not exceed eight dwelling units per acre;
2) That an adequate text be provided with coordinated architecture and compatible building
materials with the predominant material being brick or stone;
3) That the lot coverage meet the Code requirement and not exceed 70 percent of the overall
area;
4) That vehicular access be studied further; .......
5) That the Landscaping Code be met with this project plus an appropriate buffer along the
west property line;
6) That the applicant provide an adequate pedestrian system within the development to the ~
satisfaction of Staff;
7) That an appropriate level of recreational space be provided to the satisfaction of Staff;
8) That the 30 feet from centerline on Martin Road be dedicated.
9) That the roadway base, curbs, and gutters meet the City engineering standards.
* Michael Shannon agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 6-0.
RESULT: This Concept Plan was approved and will be forwarded to City Council for its
consideration.
S . FF CERTIFICATION: , \~
. ~~p~"
,
, .
Rezoning Application
Z9S-OOS
Preliminary Development Plan
lsa L. Fierce, PlaMartin Commons
Yr!......__.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - August 5, 1993
Page 10
Mr. Levine was asked if he had y problem with addressing e concerns about the pedestrian
movement. Mr. Levine asked at Graeter's not have to b the entire burden of installing the
sidewalk. They will be hag y to participate, however.
Ms. Stillwell be approved with the eight foll ing
conditions:
JIll' 1) oper legal description be
by City ouncil;
2) That e building materials be itecturally compatible with the surr nding buildings
- to north and south;
3) at. signage be in compli with Code consistent with signage sed for the bank and
estaurant;
That the ,applicant sub t a revised text to include:more' info ation on the architectural
details of the buildi and architecturally integrated with, e structure;
That the text be evised to clarify the permitted use and appropriate development
standards, es ally as it relates to the reuse of the . e in the future;
6) That the desi of the parking lot meet the requir ents of the City Engineer in terms
of geome . s and location of accessways and ais s. The interior access should directly
align wi the Max and Erma's site to the no
7) That overall plan showing all of the ou cels along Frantz Road be submitted; and
8) Tha e applicant resolve pedestrian ace s to the site with the Staff.
Mr. Pe ow seconded the motion. The vot was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Manus,
yes; . Rauh, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; . Peplow, yes; and Mrs. Stillwell, yes. . (Approved
6 .
JIIII ~ 8. Concept Plan - Martin Road PUD - 2980~3110 Martin Road
Lisa Fierce presented this case and slides. The subject site is + 15 acres situated between Martin
- Road and future Stoneridge Lane (under construction). There isa.5Q-foot electrical easement
along the west property line. There are a number ofsingle.Jamily,residences adjacent to the site
and an existing church. A medical building is under construction along the north side of
Stoneridge Lane. Evergreen trees are situated along the west portion of the site. Mounding and
landscaping across Martin Road. to the south helps to screen the Arbors of Dublin play/pool area.
In 1989 a PUD plan was approved for a 1 65-unit retirement center and three office condominium
buildings on this site. A density of 165 units 'per acre was approved for the seniors only
development. It also included an amenity and outdoor fitness package designed for seniors.
This proposal is for 160 multi-family units within twenty buildings with an overall density 10.8
dwelling units per acre. It includes 32 condominiums located in the northeast portion of the site,
with a small park area at the center. The average unit is + 1,000 square feet. There are also
128 apartment units (one, two, and three bedrooms) with an average size of 900 square feet.
The buildings will be developed with brick, stone, stucco, and cedar lapped siding or a
.Kezomng AppllcatlOn -z, \ 4'\
Z9S-OOS
Preliminary Development
Martin Commons
--"''''--',---'-~
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 13
Mr. Ferrara said the access would be used for a cut-through. He said the entrance needed to
be located to service future residents. It would be nice if there were no access to Martin Road,
but there will be many cars coming from the complex and they need two accesses.
Mr. Zawaly felt the site should be an extension of the offices in the Stoneridge area and there
should be no access to Martin Road. It should just be an extended office complex. He would,
therefore not vote for it. There is a better land use.
""'""'"
Mr. Rauh said he was also concerned about Martin Road traffic. He did not think it fair to
close it up to the development and force the development out onto Marcy Lane or another road. ...,"''''~
Mr. Sutphen had no problem with the Martin Road access because he felt the road to the north
would relieve it and he did not.think people. would use it for a short-cut. He said this use was
better than the nursing home.
Mr. Peplow said the traffic situation on Martin Road was terrible. He .could not see how this
project would have "minimal" impact on the area. He wanted to see Martin Road used just for
emergency access.
Ms. Fierce said Condition #1, had been met except the grading issue which could be clarified
within the text. The plan should meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines within the text. Staff
would like to see the use of extruded concrete curb up to all of the units and clarification of
landscaping along the reserve area included within the text also.
Mr. Fishman made a motion to disapprove this rezoning application because it is the wrong land
use for the area and there are access issues on Martin Road. He said the developer had been
very cooperative, but it was unfair to the Northwest Civic Association to vote for this rezoning
with access onto Martin Road.
IlP-'
Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, no; Mr. Peplow,
no; Mr. Sutphen, no; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, no; Mr. Zawaly, yes; and Mr. lIrP'_,-
Fishman, yes. (Motion failed 3-4.)
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher made the motion to approve this rezoning application with the following
nine conditions:
1) The text be amended to clarify: percentage of masonry material on all building sides (70
percent brick on each building including garages), color of shutters, grading, lighting,
curbing, and landscaping within the reserve area;
2) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of staff, and utilities may
need to be relocated;
3) That lot coverage not exceed 70 percent of the overall site;
4) That right-of-way for Martin Road, consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, be dedicated
to the City (30 feet from centerline);
5) That vehicular access along Martin Road remain open only until Marcy Lane is
connected with Stoneridge Lane, and be limited to emergency use thereafter;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 14
6) That the applicant remove existing driveways from the park, and improve the grassed
area within the park to an acceptable standard, to the satisfaction of the Parks
Administrator;
7) That deed restrictions and zoning text include provisions that no more than two units be
sold to one property owner, subject to approval of the Law Director;
8) That maintenance standards for detention area be agreed upon with staff and be the
responsibility of the developer or subsequent property owner(s); and
... 9) That every tree removed be replaced with a new 2.5-inch caliper tree, subject to approval
by the Parks Administrator.
- Ron Sabatino agreed to the above conditions.
Mr. Peplow seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Peplow,
yes; Mr. Sutphen~ no; Mr. Raub, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Zawaly, no; and Mr.
Ferrara, yes. (Approved 5-2.) ,
Mr. Rauh called a five-minute recess.
3. Rezoning Application Z95-014 - omaslKohler Property (previously known as
EdwardslI-270 Property)
Bobbie Clarke said the prin staff report for this case lack:! a staff recommendation. Staff
recommends tabling to ve the issues regarding land , especially west of the Coffman
Road extension; lang within the text which will ins a transitional nature; restrictions on
usages that have ex ed hours; plans for tree and na feature preservation and architec
'area to the east, . a very intense . h-rise office development is propo , for
the area to th est, staff has asked that the co mercial area be looked at in terms aneo-
... traditional ign as has been planned in the outhwest Area "lan. Commercial should
serve the Ocal population and be designed . more of a pedestrian-friendly, inte tive manner
than . e standard manner, parking ou ont and the building placed all the ay to the back.
1;
..... Th xt includes nothing in terms of d eloper's contribution to the infrastru re and roadways
. the area. Staff feels that is one' ue that needs a further definition.
The eastern half of the site has n owned by the Thomas family for any years. The western
half was owned by one of Ruscilli interests. Staff and the C mission spent many hours
discussing the Kingswood mmons apartment. Rings Road w' ot be the predominate through
movement. The Woern -TemplelRings Road alignment will xtend through this site. At one
point, it was expected at the Coffman Road extension wo be constructed down the property
line, with both ow ers building half of it. The Co an Road extension is now bowed
westward to m . . the number of acres along 1-27 freeway.
Ms. Clarke d a stream ran north of Rings Road hich was proposed by the developer to be
put in a r ted pipe. There are three north! uth tree rows, another stream corridor, and
other tr on this site. Ms. Clarke said there as a desire to have the developer maintain the
"'_. " ' ~-"~~",'~,~,',,"--"
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 11
Mr. Ferrara asked if the sample of vinyl provide was of the same thickness and texture of that
which was going to be used. Mr. Zawaly said it had a wood grain texture and it was described
as Residential 2, D4, Color: Clay or Journeyman Clay Double 4 Dutch, or equivalent. Mr.
Ferrara asked what the longest expanse of pure vinyl siding. He also asked if the garages were
100 percent vinyl.
Ron Sabatino, the applicant, said he had told staff they were willing to add brick to some of the
garages, those exposed to the traffic, not in the rear, where the trees were. He said other than .......
the aggregate total of all the exterior of the sides would be greater than 50 percent brick.
Warren Fishman was concerned that chimneys being brick without support. He wanted to see ,","';""'"
an 80 percent brick ratio. He wanted larger trees, 3.5 inch caliper. Mr. Fishman proposed a
deed restriction limiting one property owner to no more than two units. He asked if the pond
could be a wet pond. Mr. Houk said there were elevational problems. Mr. fishman wanted it
to be weltmaintained. Mr. Houk said. standards would be made for maintenance.
-
Mr. Zawaly asked if the shingles were to be shadowed. Mr. Cobb said yes, it would be a multi-
dimensional shingle.
George Peplow asked about the setbacks for Building B facing Martin Road. He asked if it were
,flat on the front. Mr. Houle said it jogged in and out about three feet. Ms. Fierce said the
building setback line was 60 feet from centerline.
Cliff Farrow, Zoning Chair for the Northwest Civic Association and a resident of Martin Road,
said they were primarily concerned with access. He said they had several meetings with Mr.
Sabatino. He said there was an extensive discussion about making this a right-inIright-out only.
It would discourage the use of Martin Road as a cut-through road from either Sawmill Road or
the river. The possibility was discussed making it an access for emergency and safety vehicles.
Mr. Farrow said at 72 units, that is 700 cars a day on Martin Road. Where the cul de sac ~"'l
comes into Martin Road traffic is often backed up clear to US 33. On any morning
approximately seven cars are backed up. If Marcy Lane were connected, it would provide the ~i
access from Dublin Center Drive, over to Marcy Lane to Krier Drive because that is where most
people want to go. He said they . supported some. sort of emergency vehicle access was
necessary. He said the association primarily looked at land use.
Janet Jordan clarified that the parks policy has been not to always mow retention/detention ponds
in a neatly manicured way. They have been working with programs from The Ohio State
University in their Olentangy Wetlands project and the plantings there. If they think that can
be an aesthetic. pleasing addition to the area, then it would not be a mowed area, but done in
plants. She wanted the option open.
Mr. Sutphen was worried about mosquitoes. Ms. Jordan said it would be worked out so that
there would not be a mosquito nursery there. Mr. Sutphen said he wanted a pipe channel in it
to solve the problem. Randy Bowman said there were other alternatives that might be better
suited towards detention basins, such as underdrains in the bottoms of detention basins. He said
it was more aesthetically pleasing and easily maintained.
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 12
Bobbie Clarke said the original plan approved for this site was for the retirement center, zoned
with the restriction that it only have access from Stoneridge Lane or Marcy Lane. The
restriction was never supported by staff. Staff said this is housing for a much more mobile
population and the appropriate place for a piece of property with frontage on Martin Road to
gets its access is on Martin Road. It is unfair to compare this proposed development with cut-
through traffic on Martin Road which neither originates nor has a destination there. Martin
Road is more appropriate for at least one of the access points.
",.. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked if the right inlright out access was considered a full access. Ms.
Clarke said full access would be right inlleft in and right inlleft out. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher was
- uncomfortable- with the vinyl issue.
Mr. Peplow was also concerned with the vinyl usage and was not convinced yet about the access
issue. He wanted to see a higher ratio of brick used.
Mr. Zawaly did not like the vinyl proportions nor the road access. He said there was too much
ambiguity for a vote at this time.
Mr. Fishman said the nursing home was approved because it was not going to have many cars.
This rezoning may not be better from the Martin Road residents. He was worried about the lack
of clarity in this application. Mr. Fishman said he could not vote for it, he knew that the
50:50 ratio of vinyl was inappropriate. He said if 80 percent brick was agreed upon it would
be good. The rear of many buildings and entire garages were vinyl. He needed a ratio
commitment before the vote. He said the chimneys on the rendering were brick where they
were stone which meant the builder would have to support all the brick with cement blocks.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said in the similar earlier case, 70 percent brick was accepted. Mr.
Fishman said yes, but it was a different site.
,... Mr. Ferrara said the level of unpreparedness prevented voting on this rezoning. He said there
were at least six issues needing to be addressed. He said the concept was fine. The retention
- pond is not highly visible and so may not get much maintenance. It backs up to the existing
residents.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said if the applicant was able to respond and the staff was able to agree
to the responses, she was willing to vote on this case.
Jim Houk agreed to a ratio of 70 percent brick, taken across the entire building. He also agreed
that no more than two units would be owned by one owner. He agreed to maintenance standards
of the detention area to the satisfaction of staff. Mr. Ferrara asked if the 70 percent coverage
of brick would be residential only and asked about the garages. Mr. Houk said the garages
would be included as well. He agreed to plant a 2.5 inch caliper tree for each tree removed
regardless of size, above the proposal, excluding the buffers. Mr. Fishman suggested that the
replacement trees be planted in the park. Ms. Jordan asked that the applicant work with staff
on the placement of the trees. Mr. Houk agreed.
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 9
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked what formula was used in a multi-family development for figuring
traffic generation. Randy Bowman said typically for multi-family, it was eight trips per day.
He clarified that the engineering staff had looked at the issue and understood the residents'
concerns. He said they had taken a new look at the traffic generation from this development and
had plugged it into the traffic projections for the Martin Road and SR 161 areas. He said there
will be an increase of traffic produced by this development, but it is very small. Randy
Bowman said additional traffic to SR 161 needs to be minimized and because of the minimal
-
impacts the development would have on the adjacent roadways, they feel that there is a need for
an additional access point to Martin Road. In addition, because of the need for emergency
vehicular access, there must be at least two access points in the development. The engineering .....'..-
staff has consistently recommended multiple access points to multi-family developments.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said the Northwest Civic Association's letter clearly stated that their
approval seemed to be conditional on the one entrance/exit. She.thought it was dense enough
to require more than one entry and exit.IDtimately, when the two lanes are connected, traffic
will get off SR 161 and use Martin Road to either go east or west.
Bobbie Clarke said Marcy Lane was originally designed to take some of the eastbound traffic
headed southbound to Sawmill Road to avoid use of the Sawmill RoadlSR 161 intersection.
Lisa Fierce clarified that there were 72 units, not 60 proposed. Staff had met with the neighbors
to discuss issues including access, but had not met with the Northwest Civic Association.
Dan Sutphen said north of 1-270, along the power easement was a proposed bike path through
the Schottenstein property. Ms. Fierce agreed. Mr. Sutphen asked if a bike path could be
constructed to the AMC Theater area. Fred Hahn said it had not been considered, but the bike
paths would still need to be routed through parking lots in the office complex.
Ml
Mr. Sutphen asked about the extension of Stoneridge Lane to Dale Drive. Ms. Clarke said it
was one of the improvements included within the SR 161 widening project. This improvement
is generally programmed for 1998 or 1999. ..-
Peter Zawaly agreed with Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher'scomments about traffic. He asked why all
the stone was going to be. replaced with brick and what the . percentage of masonry to be used
was. He noticed the rear. elevations of some buildings showed vinyl siding only with no
masonry. Ms. Fierce said a large percentage of the rear elevations, especially the townhomes
which fronted on Martin Road included vinyl siding with limited masonry. Mr. Zawaly asked
about the tree preservation plan. Ms. Fierce said information as to the location of significant
trees had been received. The tree preservation plan would show the limitations of cOnstruction,
where snowfencing will be located, and where the utilities will be located. Mr. Zawalyasked
about snowfencing. Ms. Fierce said snowfencing was the actual, physical material used to
install around the trees to define the limits of construction. The tree preservation plan was to
establish those trees that are to be saved. Mr. Zawaly asked if any of the trees would be saved.
Lisa Fierce said yes, there is a large open space area designated on the plan. Staff would like
to see the significant trees preserved in that area based upon the tree survey submitted. Along
Martin Road, there are a couple clusters of treed areas staff would like to see preserved if
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 10
possible. This is why the utilities may need to be relocated if possible. Ms. Fierce said staff
had accessed all the trees on the site.
Mr. Fishman asked how the site was presently zoned. Lisa Fierce said it was PUD, Planned
Unit Development District, for the Martin Road Retirement Center which included 165 units plus
offices.
",. Mr. Fishman said this was one of the prettiest sites in that area. It had many trees on it. This
plan looked like a high density development which eliminated most of the trees. Ms. Fierce said
! the 7.7 dulac was within the range established when the concept plan was approved. She said
..... staff had the same concerns regarding the proportion of vinyl and masonry material used. Ms.
Clarke said it is very difficult to maintain small islands of established trees when the site is
redeveloped because it gets regraded, the drainage must be checked, and parts of the root
systems get severed with the construction of the new foundation. Staff felt it better to find out
which trees were the best, rope them off, and then permit the rest of the site to be developed
in accordance with the developer's wishes.
John Ferrara asked if a condition was needed that all the septic systems had been properly
evacuated. Ms. Clarke said she thought it was done when the buildings were removed. Randy
Bowman said it was the responsibility of the developer.
Jim Houk, Bird Houk and Associates, representing T &R Properties, agreed with the above
conditions. He said however, the developer would like some conditions further defined. He
said the plan had been modified many times to meet stafrs approval and meet the neighbors
concerns. The detention area is located in the northern portion of the site, to be maintained by
the developer or office owner's association.
Mike Cobb, T&R Properties,presented the color and material selections for the project. He
".. showed a photograph of a structure of which they were trying to duplicate for this development.
Mr. Zawaly asked if the photograph would be labeled exhibit A, numbered, and made part of
i
t, the record. Mr. Cobb agreed to do so. He said the brick, Shenandoah, Mary Brothers, had
..... browns and clay colors which would compliment the clay-colored siding. The asphalt shingle,
a weathered wood, best demonstrates the' color brought out in the shingle with a lot of blue and
brown in the wood. The doors will be a soft, grey-blue color, which also compliment the
asphalt shingles. The sofit, facia, gutters, and downspouts will be a pebblestone clay color.
The cedar used for exterior trim will be a brownish color, either Olympic or Glidden Taupe.
He presented a book to the Commission which he said indicated the look they wanted to achieve.
Mr. Ferrara asked what percent of the building would be masonry vs. vinyl. Mr. Houk said the
applicant had indicated to him that it averaged about 50 percent, with some sides without
masonry and some with the majority masonry. He said some of it was indicated on the
elevations submitted. Mr. Ferrara said that was vague.
Mr. Ferrara asked about the septic systems. Mr. Houk said an environmental study had been
done by the applicant which basically cleared all the problems relevant to them.
....
~-~."_.~-,-.",~,~"-.,._~._.~,~,...~.~"_'~._,..~~_.--~.'-~.~_.._-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 7
9) That a double w of evergreen trees be stalled, replacing the pro privacy fence
roperty line, to the satis ction of staff;
10) That all b. ths be constructed at e time of street constructi ; and
11) to be installed within park area be no less than .S inches in cali
the vote was as follows: . Peplow, yes; . Rauh,
. Zawaly, yes; Mr. Fishm tphen, yes. ..~.
(App
2. Rezoning Application Z95-00S - Preliminary Development Plan - Martin Commons
Lisa Fierce presented this previously tabled rezoning application. The applicant has met with
the Martin Road residents and has redesigned the park location, buffering, layout, and access.
The Commission approved several years ago the concept plan which included 165 multi-family
units. Concerns included limiting the density to 8 dulac, providing an appropriate park with an
adequate pedestrian system, buffering along the west property line, limiting structures to one-
story, and assessing vehicular access needs along Martin Road.
The 10-acre site is located on the north side of Martin Road. The northern piece is zoned PUD
for condominium offices. There are a number of trees located throughout and along the western
property line. The site is relatively flat. Trees on the eastern portion are in poor condition and
trees in the western end are in fair to good condition. There is a lOO-foot wide transmission
easement running along the western third of the site, but there are no towers located on the site.
Ms. Fierce said the site plan included three types of residential condominium units. Building
A has ranch-style units with an optional loft. All are two bedrooms with one or two car attached
garages. Building B is located along Martin Road and contains townhouse units having two ~~1
bedrooms and one car attached garages. Building C is located along the eastern portion of the
site and has a more significantly sloping roofs, with two bedrooms and detached garages.
......
The same building materials will be used for all three styles including a warm-colored jumbo
brick. Ms. Fierce pointed out that cultured stone was erroneously shown on the plan will not
be used. Brick will be used in place of stone. A clay-colored vinyl siding will also be used.
The brick/vinyl proportions need to be clarified. A composite asphalt shingle will be used.
Ms. Fierce said this proposal includes an access road, 24 feet in width, for the general direct
route through the site. Some of the smaller driveways are twelve feet in width and the western
most driveway is eighteen feet in width. Along Martin Road it will be used as a full service
entry until March Lane is connected to Stoneridge Lane. The access along Martin road will be
used only for emergency purposes after the connection.
A letter was submitted to the Commissioners from the Northwest Civic Association stating
support of this plan, with only temporary access on Martin Road. It requested that the
connection be made between Marcy Lane and Stoneridge Lane as soon as possible. Ms. Fierce
said the City was in the process of obtaining a survey of that missing link to start the acquisition
t!>"'..
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - September 7, 1995
Page 8
process. Staff believes that access onto Martin Road should remain open for adequate fire and
safety access and better distribution of traffic.
Ms. Fierce said the 2.3 acre parkland had been redesigned to along the western portion of the
site and met code requirements. It included a portion of the lOO-foot transmission easement in
which no structures could be located. Staff believes this is the best location of park because it
provides the best trees and a location where it can be utilized by everyone on Martin Road. A
,. reserve area north of the park is .for detention and will also serve as a buffer between the offices
to the north and the parkland to the south. The text states it will be owned and maintained
forever by the developer or by the established homeowners' association.
--
Buffering on the north property line will consist of a mixture of mounds and shade, ornamental,
and evergreen trees. To meet the six-foot,screening requirement along the east property line,
mound and evergreen trees will be used. The. access road will be installed with the
development, running through the office/condominium development into this site and will include
a bike path along the east or west side. A bike path will also be located_ along the north side of
Martin Road.
Staff is recommending approval of this application with the following five conditions:
1) The text be amended to clarify. percentage of masonry material on all building sides,
color of shutters, grading, lighting, curbing and landscaping within the reserve area;
2) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of Staff, and utilities may
need to be relocated if necessary;
3) That lot coverage should not exceed 70 percent of the overall area;
4) That right-of-way for Martin Road, consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, be dedicated
to the City (30 feet from centerline);
5) That access along Martin Road remain open; and
,.... 6) That the applicant remove the existing driveways from the park area and improve the
grassed area within the park to an acceptable standard, to the satisfaction of the Parks
Administrator.
-
Ms. 'Chinnici-Zuercher asked about staffs ,position on retaining the Martin Road entrance/exit
as opposed to converting it into an emergency access. Ms. . Fierce responded there should be
more than one way into and out of this development. Staff believes in providing alternatives for
circulation needs. The analyses of several traffic consultants indicates the impact will be
negligible with +60 units proposed. She agreed there is a problem on Martin Road now with
traffic speed. Staff believes, therefore, it should remain open. If it were closed, would the only
entrance to this development would be. from Stoneridge Lane. She said Stoneridge Lane could
be accessed from Dublin Center Drive by Designer Shoe Warehouse. When Marcy Lane and
Stoneridge Lane are connected, it will provide access to Martin Road.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked what the time frame was for the connection of the two streets.
Ms. Fierce said the City was in the process of surveying the property for acquisition and then
construction. She estimated it would take twelve months. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked what
the time frame was for this development. Ms. Fierce did not know.
...
~.._..,._-~> ~.,,~...-,
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - September 7, 1995
Page 7
0 The required parking for the project is 180 spaces. Parking provided includes 202 spaces
based on the garages, space behind the attached garages, and additional visitor spaces.
The plan includes seven detached garage buildings, ranging in size from four-bay to six-
bay buildings. Vinyl siding is the predominant building material on the garages, with
brick on the ends only.
0 Circulation for the plan includes a 24-foot (private) access road with a circuitous design. ~
A connection will be made to Stoneridge Lane through the undeveloped office area across
from the Department of Medicine Foundation curb cut. This will be constructed with
the development of the condominiums. Other portions of the circulation system include
18 and 12-foot wide roads. The 24-foot road will be constructed with six-inch concrete
curbs. No commitment has been made regarding the more narrow access roads.
Extruded concrete curbing should extend to the condo units. The depth of pavement and
design must meet the requirements of the City Engineer.
0 The plan includes temporary access along Martin Road. The text and plan state that it
will be used as a full-service entry to the development only until Marcy Lane is
connected to Stoneridge Lane. Thereafter, it will only provide emergency access. Based
on a traffic analysis of the area, staff believes the access along Martin Road should
remain open to provide adequate fire and safety access, and better distribution of traffic.
The entrance along Martin Road should present neither appreciable traffic movement
conflicts nor increase traffic volumes on Martin Road.
0 The proposed building setback is 30 feet along Martin Road (60 feet from centerline).
Pavement setback proposed is 20 feet from proposed right-of-way. The setback for
buildings and pavement along the north and east property lines is 15 feet. The minimum
separation distances between buildings will be ten feet.
0 Grading of the site should be consistent with the existing residential neighbors to the east
andwest. This should be addressed within the text and at the time of final development
plan review . Lighting should meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. ""'~
0 Parkland for the site consists of 2.3 acres which meets Code for public dedication (25
percent of residential area). It is located at the west side of the property, adjacent to the
. existing residential area. The site's best trees are located in this area. A bikepath along -
the entire Martin Road frontage and along the access drive from Stoneridge Lane to the
site. The location provides public access for, and a shared facility between, the existing
neighborhood and the new residents.
0 A 0.67-acre "reserve" is proposed at the northwest corner of the site, just north of the
park. The reserve will be used for detention and serve as a buffer between the park and
the proposed offices. The text states that the detention area will be owned and
maintained in perpetuity by the developer or homeowners' association. Stormwater
management must meet the guidelines of the City Engineer.
0 The buffer along the north side of the condominiums will include a mixture of
ornamental and evergreen, and shade trees. Mounds and hedges will be used as needed
to create an overall six-foot high continuous screen. Clarification is needed regarding
landscaping along the south side of the reserve area. Along the east property line, a
mound and evergreen trees will be used to create a six-foot continuous screen. The text
states that all landscaping will meet Code requirements.
--
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - September 7, 1995
Page 8
0 All private streets and utilities must be maintained by the owner and noted as such on the
final plat. Pavement and street design, including evaluating the need for turn lanes must
meet the requirements of the City Engineer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary development plan subject to the following five
". conditions:
Conditions:
- 1) The text be amended to clarify percentage of masonry material on all building
sides, color of shutters, grading, lighting, curbing and landscaping within the
reserve area;
2) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, to the. satisfaction of Staff, and
utilities may need to be relocated;
3) That lot coverage not exceed 70 percent of the overall ~;
4) That right-of-way for Martin Road, consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, be
dedicated to the City (30 feet from centerline); and
5) That access along Martin Road remain open.
Bases:
I) The preliminary development plan, as amended, is consistent with the approved
concept plan for the site.
2) The plan will provide for needed public parkland east of the river, consistent with
the Community Plan.
3) The plan is compatible with the surrounding area.
4) The development provides a broader range of housing options in the area,
consistent with the Community Plan.
,...
-
....
"~~._-"."~..~-~_.._-----"..-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - September 7, 1995
PageS
CASE 2: Rezoning Application Z9S-OOS - Preliminstry Development Plan - Martin
Commons
APPLICANT: T&R Properties, c/o Ronald Sabatino, President, 6563 Worthington-Galena
Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085.
REQUEST: Review and approval of a rezoning application from PUD, Planned Unit -
Development District to PUD by revision of the preliminary development plan in
accordance with Section 1181.07, for the 9.9-acre site located on the north side ......,.oilIlBi
of Martin Road, approximately 1,000 feet to the west of Sawmill Road. The
proposal includes 72 multi-family units with 2.3 acres of parkland.
STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Fierce, Planner
BACKGROUND:
This case was tabled without discussion at the June 15, 1995 Planning ~d Zoning Commission
meeting. Since that time, Staff has met with the applicant and representatives from the
neighborhood to discuss the development issues. The plan has been redesigned to address the
park land location, buffer, layout, and access issues.
A preliminary development plan was approved for this site in 1989 for a 135,000 square foot,
165-unit retirement center facing Martin Road, and three office buildings facing Stoneridge Lane
totalling just over 40,000 square feet. The overall gross density was 16.5 dwelling units per
acre. The plan also included a variety of outdoor, senior-oriented activity and fitness options
within private open space. The residents on Martin Road were concerned that the development
would increase traffic on their residential street. The applicant at that time reoriented the access
from Martin Road to Stoneridge Lane (only) to the north. The Final Development Plan for this
retirement center was subsequently approved as well. The plan for the retirement center has "",,-t-""
since been abandoned by the original applicant. The office portion of the plan remains
unchanged.
.......
A concept plan was approved by both the Commission and City Council for a f60-unit multi-
family development within 20 buildings with 2.1 acres of open space on August 5, 1993 and
September 20, 1993, respectively. The major concerns at that time were limiting the density
to eight dwelling units per acre, providing an appropriate park with adequate pedestrian
circulation, buffering along the west property line, limiting structures to one-story along the west
property line, and assessing of vehicular access along Martin Road. The concept plan is totally
) non-binding, but designed to give appropriate feedback on a proposed development.
This application is an amended preliminary development plan, which includes the rezoning
~ request, and delineates the land use, development standards, design guidelines, density, park
area, and road configuration, and effectively serves as the preliminary plat. Following a
recommendation from the Commission, a public hearing will be held at City Council and later
a vote will be taken by Council to approve or deny the petition. A two-thirds vote of Council
will be required to overturn the Planning Commission recommendation. Upon approval of the
rezoning, the applicant will need to submit a final development plan for at least 20 percent of
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - September 7, 1995
Page 6
the property within 240 days. Each phase will be subject to Commission approval prior to
construction under the final development plan regulations. The process is governed by Section
1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code.
CONSIDERATIONS:
0 The site is relatively flat with mature trees located throughout. There are mature
",.. evergreen trees along the western end and various deciduous trees in good condition.
Along the eastern portion are several large silver maple trees in poor condition. A 100-
foot wide high voltage powerline.runs north/south through the western third of the site.
-- No transmission towers are located on the site.
0 To the north, across Stoneridge Lane, is the Medicine Foundation office, Designer Shoe
Warehouse, and Stoneridge medical office building all zoned PUD. East of the site is
Martin Road Christian Church and three single-family houses, zoned R-2, Limited
Suburban Residential District, andR-4, Suburban Residential District. To the south,
across Martin Road, is recreational space and parking (in Du1?lin) for the Arbors of
Dublin apartment complex (in Columbus), and three single-family lots. West of the site
are large-lot, single-family homes on Lilly-Mar Court zoned R-2.
0 The layout includes park and detention on the western third of the site. A combination
of condominium building types is located along the eastern two-thirds of the site. The
eastern edge of the site is lined with detached garage. buildings. The main access
proposed is located from Stoneridge Lane on the north. Temporary/emergency access
is proposed along Martin Road.
0 The proposal includes a mixture of three residential condominium units. They include
16 attached ranch-style condominiums (four-unit buildings), located within the center of
the site with attached garages. Along the east end of the site, the plan includes 32
attached, one and one-half story condominiums.(eight-unit buildings) with optional lofts
and detached garages. Along Martin Road, 24 attached, two-story condominiums (eight-
,.. unit buildings) are proposed with attached garages. The text indicates overall net density
of the project will not exceed 8.0 dwelling units per acre. The plans actually shows 7.74
; dwelling units per acre.
l.
...... 0 The ranch-style units (building II A ") will include two bedrooms with an optional loft and
optional screened patios. The units will have a one or two-car garage. These units take
a common form and are similar to the Villages at Tuttle Crossing (Wilcox Road) and
Graystone (Frantz Road in Columbus). The townhouse condominiums (building liB")
will also have two bedrooms, with one-car garages. These units will have optional bay
windows. The attached one-story units (building "C") have a larger roof line than the
rest, with one and two bedrooms. All of these units will have dormer windows. Lofts
are optional., Detached garages will provide 38 parking spaces for these units.
0 The same building materials will be used on all building types. The predominant
material will be a warm-colored (redlbrown), oversized brick. (please note: the plans
incorrectly show stone.) Clay-colored vinyl siding will be used to cover the remaining
exterior. The text does not identify the proposed percentage of masonry material on each
elevation. Wood trim (taupe) and shutters will be used, and the roof will include
weathered wood composite asphalt shingles. No information was provided regarding the
color of proposed shutters. The maximum building height is 35 feet within the text.
...
.......
--
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
SlwTKMBER 7, 1995
CITY OF DUBLIN -
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regular meeting:
~-i',;"'''
2. Rezoning Application Z9S-OOS - Preliminary Development Plan - Martin Commons
Location: 9.893 acres located on the north side of.Martin Road, approximately 1,000
feet west of Sawmill Road.
Emtfng Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District.
Request: PUD, Planned. Unit Development District with amended Preliminary
Development Plan.
Proposed Use: A 72-unit, multi-family residential development with 2.3 acres of
parkland.
Applicant: T & R Properties, c/o Ronald Sabatino, President, 6563 Worthington Galena
Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085.
Staff Contact: Lisa L. Fierce, Planner. -
MOTION #1: To disapprove this rezoning application because it is the wrong land use for the
area and there are access issues on Martin Road.
VOTE: 3-4.
RFSULT: The ~otion failed. "
MOTION #2: To approve this rezoning application with the following nine conditions:
~
1) The text be amended to clarify: percentage of masonry material on all building sides (70
percent brick on each building including garages), color of shutters, grading, lighting,
curbing, and landscaping within the reserve area;
2) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, to the satisfaction of staff, and utilities may
need to be relocated;
3) That lot coverage not exceed 70 percent of the overall site;
4) That right-of-way for Martin Road, consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, be dedicated
to the City (30 feet from centerline);
5) That vehicular access along Martin Road remain open only until Marcy Lane is
connected with Stoneridge Lane, and be limited to emergency use thereafter;
6) That the applicant remove existing driveways from the park, and improve the grassed
area within the park to an acceptable standard, to the satisfaction of the Parks
Administrator;
Page lof2
"'-
.....
DUBLIN PLANNING AND WNlNG COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
SEPrEMBER 7, 1995
2. Rezoning Application Z9S-005 - Preliminary Development Plan - Martin Commons
(Cont.)
.JlIIII
7) That deed restrictions and zoning text include provisions that no more than two units be
- sold to one property owner, subject to approval of the Law Director; .
8) That maintenance standards for detention area be agreed upon with staff and be the
responsibility of the developer or subsequent property owner(s); and
9) That every tree removed be replaced with a new 2.5-inch caliper tree, subject to approval
by the Parks Administrator.
* Ronald Sabatino.agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 5-2.
RESULT: A recommendation of approval will be forwarded to City Council.
.
....
--
Page 2 of 2
...
, -,_.~~--_._------_._-_..-.-----_.-
:
,
Waste and Refuse:
.
1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a
solid wall or fence.
landscaoina:
1. All landscaping shall be according to Dublin landscape Code Chapter 1187.
2. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. See Preliminary
Development Plan for trees to be preserved and removed. All trees to be
~'''''' preserved will be protected by snow fencing placed at the drip line prior to
the start of construction and maintained throughout the construction period.
-.
3. Street trees will be provided in accordance with Dublin Street Tree Program
Standards. Street trees along Martin Road will be placed at 45 ' on center
while street trees along access roads will be placed a maximum of 30' on
center. See Exhibit 4.
4. Along western boundary, all existing trees shall be preserved. Evergreens
will supplement existing tree row as well as a mix of earth mounding,
evergreen trees, shade trees and ornamental trees to screen parking areas.
landscape materials shall be installed to provide a minimum of 50% winter
opacity and 70% summer opacity. Trees shall not interfere with required
detention area as calculated by engineer.
5. North landscape buffer shall include seeded or sodded mound with a mix of
ornamental and evergreen and shade trees. One shade tree shall be planted
for every 40' of lineal boundary and evergree~s will be planted at 10' on
center. In addition, earth mounding and hedges will be utilized as necessary
to create the required 6' high continuous opacity.
I
6. East landscape buffer shall include a continuous seeded or sodded mound .
with a continuous screen of evergreen trees placed at 10 on center. Earth
mound shall be 3' to 5' in height. This treatment will meet a 6' high
continuous opacity.
7. landscaped entry feature shall be provided at the Martin Road entry. . This
entry feature shall contain a small entry sign and ornamental plantings
including flowering shrubs and/or annual and perennial flower beds.
Liahtina:
1. External light fixtures may be pole or wall mounted, dark in color and of
similar type and style.
2. All lighting shall be cut off fixtures.
3. Lighting along parking and roadways shall be limited to a maximum height of
14' .
Fences and Walls:
- 1. Nochain link or wire fencing shall be permitted.
.-
-.---- -.--.--. '.' ....-...-. . .-.
- -- ---- --.-- '~""'--'~ ."'-'!!!'~'~' .~~_.. ~_."" .
- .
-
D. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage facilities,
including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. All
utility services shall be underground.
All utilities are present at site and will meet the standards of the Dublin City
Engineer. See Preliminary Utility Plan.
E. The proposed traffic circulation patterns, including public and private streets and
parking areas, indicating their relationship to topography and existing streets, or
showing other evidence of reasonableness.
..<~ A proposed private street will run NorthlSouth through this development and the
proposed office development to the North. This roadway will act as the main
'-ci>, collector through the project and tie Stoneridge L~ne with Martin Road giving the
proposed residential access to both the North and the South. This NorthlSouth
roadway will be 24'.
A secondary road system will access garage units within both building types.
These access roads will be 24'.
Ranch units will have 1-112 garage spaces per unit and additional off street parking
spaces shall be as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. Single family
detached units will all have two car garages.
F. The proposed schedule of site development, construction of structures and
associated facilities. Such schedule shall include the proposed use of reuse of
existing features such as topography, structures, streets, easements and natural
areas. i
Should this zoning be approved, construction is expected to start by the end of ;
1995 and the project will be developed in one phase. The road connection from
Martin to Stoneridge will be built with Phase 1.
f
G. I
The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the "
,
I.
..-"" surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public [
improvements. l
The site is surrounded by an existing and proposed office to the North, multi-family !
r
residential at 10-12 units per acre to the South across Martin Road, historic larger ,
lot single family to the West and older transitional single family and retail to the h
East.
The proposed residential use of this site for condominium development at 7 units
per acre will act as a good transition from the more intense office, retail and multi-
family uses to the North & East and the historic lower density single family to the
West.
:~
~;t
;! ,
,
tt ;
,
,.
;;
,
- I
,~
-,
- ... -..-. ..' - ~ - " .- -_.- . __ n__.. il~__...:__ ._ .
:
, . .
H. Development Standards: ,
Permitted Uses:
1. The residential PUD will consist of attached and detached residential homes.
Permitted Densitv:
1. The density will not exceed 6.7 du/ac. as specified in the Preliminary
Development Plan. See Exhibit 4.
Yard & Setback Reauirements: liliiii
1. Building setback along Martin Road shall be 30' from proposed ROW or 60' ...,.
from centerline. Pavement setback shall be 20' from proposed ROW.
2. Setback along West boundary shall be 70' for all buildings and pavement.
3. Setbacks along North boundary shall be 1S' for buildings and 10' for
pavement.
4. Setback along East boundary shall be 1 S' for buildings and pavement.
S. Minimum distance between buildings shall be 6' for detached two story
condominiums and 10' for attached four unit ranch condominiums.
Heiaht Reauirements:
1. Maximum height for structures shall be 3S' as measured per the Dublin
Zoning Code.
Parkina and Loadina:
1. Size, ratio and type of parking shall be regulated by Dublin Zoning Code,
Chapter 1193. ,
Circulation:
....
1. R.O.W. will be dedicated along Martin Road equal to 30' from centerline.
2. One full service curb cut access shall be allowed along Martin Road to the
South and one road connection through the proposed office development to
Stoneridge Lane to the North as indicated on the Preliminary Development
Plan. See Exhibit 4.
3. Access roads shall be 24' wide with exception of those that service four
units or less which shall be 1 2' .
4. Final location and design of all access roads to be subject to approval of the
D~blin City Engineer.
\
I
,
\ -
----'"
,_^___"~.__...c~__ ',_~~_'_~_~'.'_.'~____,,~ _."._____ _..__
.,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dublin City Council
FROM: Bobbie Clarke
_':~.'I-~, DATE: November 2, 1995
SUBJECT: Rezoning for Martin Commons, Access onto Martin Road
illlillj";,j.; Ordinance #22-95.
The public hearing for the rezoning of Martin Commons (proposed multi-family development
on Martin Road) to the PUD District is scheduled for November 6, 1995.
Please be advised that the Planning and Zoning Commission appended a condition regarding the
access for the development. Upon completion of the missing link of Stoneridge Lane, the
Martin Road access is to "be limited to emergency use only." Neither the Development
Department staff nor the Washington Township Fire Department can support this condition.
Staff opposition in this matter was expressed at the meeting. There was, however, neighborhood
support for it as well as that of the Northwest Civic Association (generally a Columbus
organization, but its boundaries include Martin Road). The developer is agreeable to either
traffic access configuration.
The written recommendations from both Balbir Kindra and Captain Sedlock are attached. Both
consider this to be a safety issue and recommend that Martin Road be used as one of the
permanent access points for the proposed development. Staff recommends that condition 5 be
~""'''' reworded as it was contained in the original Staff Report on this case:
~".j 5) That access along Martin Road remain open.
Staff is specifically requesting that the Planning Commission's condition regarding access be
overturned by City Council.
"",.".
-,--
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Terry Foegler
Director of Development! Assistant City Manager
FROM: Balbir Kindra ....
City Engineer
....
DATE: October 16, 1995
SUBJECT: Proposed Martin Commons Rezoning
At its second meeting in September, the Planning Commission recommended approval for the
rezoning of a multi-family development called Martin Commons. The proposed development is
to be located on the north side of Martin Road near the intersection of Martin Road and Krier
Drive. Within the staff report, the City Engineer strongly recommended that permanent vehicular
access be provided to both Martin Road and Stoneridge Lane. With a prior rezoning proposal
for this property, and with the current rezoning request, residents along Martin Road have voiced
concerns that any new vehicular connection to Martin Road would have a negative impact to
traffic volumes on Martin Road. With the previous rezoning request (a concept plan) the City
Engineer investigated whether a vehicular connection to Martin Road would warrant the need for
a left turn lane on Martin Road. The developer's traffic engineer studied left turn lane warrants
and it was found that a left turn lane was not needed for the proposed development at that time.
The City Engineer concurred with the findings, and, in addition, determined that the development J
would not have an appreciable increase in traffic on Martin Road.
Although the current development proposal is similar to the previous proposal in terms of density
of dwelling units and office space, the City Engineer has analyzed it for impacts to the existing
adjacent roadways. The City Engineer secured the services of an independent traffic engineer
to review the development proposal and the previous traffic engineering analysis. At this
juncture, the City has better traffic data than what was available with the previous rezoning.
With pending improvements to State Route 161 and Sawmill Road in the area, and with recent
development-related traffic studies north of 1-270, better traffic data was available to use in this
most recent analysis of the traffic impacts of the current proposal. As with the previous proposal,
it was determined that the resultant increase in traffic from the current proposal on Martin Road
has no appreciable affects to the level of service on Martin Road or at the adjacent intersections.
The City Engineer, therefore, has again verified that a vehicular connection to Martin Road will
have no appreciable negative affect to traffic volumes on Martin Road, and is extremely
beneficial to the distribution of the traffic from this development.
~
Randy Bowman, P.E.
City of Dublin
Martin Commons
17 October 1995
Page two
The fire inspection staff does not have the resources or time to
~ insure their continued and complete availability over the course
of the long run.
b"
In addition, changes in the property management staff or property
ownership increases the probability that these type of access
points will not be maintained properly.
Therefore this letter shall serve as the fire departments'
complete agreement with the position of the City Engineer and
wholeheartedly endorse the continued pursuit of at least two
means of vehicular access for this as well as all other
commercial and multi-family projects.
Warmest regards,
J~
Sedlock
ion Bureau Commander
OWNS HIP FIRE DEPARTMENT
~"~
-,;".,;,
--
Gene Bostic, Fire Chief Emer~ency
889-2347 911
,J. Robert Ross Business
Assistant Fire Chief 889-2347
764-1269
Aclrnin. FAX
John S. Sedlock, Captain WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT 614-766-2507
Fire Prevention Bureau RECEIVED Station 91 FAX
766-0857
614-889-0043
Robert P. Gasper, Captain OCT? 0 1995 ..
Trainin~ Officer
798-2204 i
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ....
CITY OF DUBLIN
17 October 1995
Mr. Randy Bowman, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
City of Dublin
5800 Shier-Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
Re: Martin Commons Project
Dear Randy,
I have been given your letter to Chief Bostic concerning access
issues for the proposed Martin Commons mUlti-family project and
have been asked to author a response.
As you are aware, through our staff project review meetings, the
fire department is always desirous of at least two means of
gaining access to a property in the event of an emergency. This
has been and will continue to be a policy we will strive for on .,
each project. I
....
As for the Martin Commons project I believe you may recall I made
issue of only one access point when this plan was first brought
forward. A subsequent plan was introduced that reflected an
additional entry point with a note "To Be Closed Upon
Construction Of Marcy Lane (by others)".
Again I made issue of this note and felt that this access point
should remain permanently open.
As for the fire departments' position on "emergency only" access
points, this option clearly presents a host of problems. Such
problems as maintenance, snow removal, temporary or permanent
obstructions and identification are obvious concerns with no
apparent solution.
Administration Offices - 6375 Shier Ring'S Road, Suite G, Dublin, Ohio 43017
Fire Station No. 91 - 6255 Shier Rings Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017
Fire Station No. 93 - 5825 Brand Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017
,..
~~
.- RECORD OF ORDINANCES
~ LopI B...... Co. F_ N... 10043
Ordinance NO.n__m___mmm__m P assed__mn__ ____ _m__m _______m____m____m ____19 mn___
....' ...~
U ORDI:RAIICB PROVI:DI:IIG I'OR A CDltGB I:II 101tI:IIG I'OR
'.813 ACRBS 01' LUD LOCA'IBD 011 HB 1I0RD SI:DB 01'
..... DRTI:II ROAD, APPROXDlATBLY 150 I'Bft WEST 01' DI:BR
DRI:VB AND DRTI:II ROAD ROlli POD, PLADBD maT
DBVBLOPKBIIT DI:SftI:C'!, TOI POD, PLADBD UltI:T
DBVBLOPHBIl'1' DI:SftI:C'!. (DRTI:II COKKOIIS)
1I0W, '.rJIBRBI'ORB, BB I:T ORDAIItBD by the Council of the city of
Dublin, state of Ohio, of the elected members
concurring: .
section 1. That the following described real estate (see
attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the city of
Dublin, state of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to Planned Unit
Development District and shall be subject to regulations and"
procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of
the Codified Ordinances) the city of Dublin Zoning Code and
amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list
of contiguous and affected property owners, and the
recommendations of the Planning and zoning Commission, Exhibit
"CO, are all incorporated into and made an official part of
this Ordinance and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance
therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
.Passed this day of , 199_.
" ,
".;-
~ Mayor - presiding Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
,-.-
hASlIt.l8Mtnm'lO
-I~ ~/tli. ~
- I --FORMEETrNGON!/ 6,/?5
-
-
<
Multiple means of ingress & egress points to developments such as Martin Commons are
important for two reasons. The first, which is obvious, is the need for access by emergency
vehicles at all times. Although no developer can be expected to account for all possible
emergency situations, it is reasonable to expect a project, such as Martin Commons, to be
provided with more than one access point to public streets wherever possible. Emergency
P' situations such as natural disasters (i.e., tornadoes, high winds) may block an access point to a
public street. Maintenance may be underway within the development and may block access to
emergency vehicles, therefore, a secondary access point must be provided.
*""',-'.'-.;1.
Secondly, traffic generated by development should be distributed from a development, such as
Martin Commons, through more than one access point. In the case of Martin Commons, access
solely to Stoneridge Lane and, ultimately, to the intersection of Dublin Center Drive and 161 will
put a further burden on the signal operations at that intersection. Although a significant level of
service deficiency should not be produced at that intersection, the City Engineer has determined
that the preservation of capacity and signal operation along 161 is of the utmost concern for
roadways in the immediate vicinity. State Route 161 is a principal arterial in the City of Dublin;
whereas, Martin Road is a local collector, although cut-through traffic uses Martin Road because
of deficiencies on 161 and Sawmill Road. Still, Martin Road is a significantly lower
classification street. With proposed improvements to 161, the level of cut-through traffic on
Martin Road should decrease, thereby further minimizing the already low level of impacts to
traffic that this development will have.
In addition, it is the City's plan to connect Marcy Lane to Stoneridge Lane, along with the
planned improvements to S.R. 161. While such a connection will help to better distribute traffic
in the area, particularly from the offices and businesses located along Stoneridge Lane, it may
not have such a positive effect on traffic produced by Martin Commons. A misconception held
by some is that with a Stoneridge to Marcy Lane connection, traffic will take that route rather
- than using Martin Road. Destinations for Martin Commons traffic include Meijer's, Target and
Kohl's. The intersection of Marcy Lane and Martin Road is not signalized and traffic using
- Marcy Lane can experience significant delays during peak hours. The better routes for traffic
leaving Martin Commons include Martin Road to Sawmill Road and S.R. 161 to Sawmill Road.
To illustrate, the City Engineer has consistently recommended multiple access points to
commercial and multi-family developments in the City. The following examples of recent
developments approved by the City are given; The Lakes at Dunmere (which will be developed
at the southeast comer of Brand Road and Muirfield Drive), Sycamore Ridge apartments (which
are located on either side of Tuller Ridge Drive), Brighton Village (a proposed condominium
development on the south side of Rings Road, just east of Brighton Park, which will have access
to Rings Road and the future extension of Wilcox Road to Britton Parkway), Kingswood
Commons (although a withdrawn application, access was maintained to multiple
A:\MARTCOM.MEM
......
,
frontages on public streets), Mil1co Office Development (a proposed office complex at the
northwest comer of Bright Road and Sawmill Road), Schottenstein's rezoning of the Northeast
Quadrant in early 1995 (which included major access issues on the new Hard Road section and
Sawmill Road), and the Dearth property on Wilcox Road, opposite Innovation Drive (a
combination single-family and multi-family development).
The condition of approval recommended by the Planning Commission does not, in the opinion
of the City Engineer, fulfill the need for permanent vehicular access at more than one location .~
wherever possible. Therefore, after careful professional consideration, the City Engineer and the I
Washington Township Fire Department strongly recommend approval of this case with two I
..
permanent access points (one on Martin Road and one on Stoneridge Lane) to maximize traffic
safety and accessibility by emergency vehicles, and minimize liability through good traffic
circulation design.
tJ#y, ~ ~(~~
Balbir S. Kindril, P.E.
City Engineer
,
I ,
.......
A:IMARTCOMMEM
.....
-
"
IIIi
C
c MARTIN
t COMMONS
r...
~ I
....
t Proposed
C
" Kcsidcntinl
II
~ :Development
. "
C
C
..
a.., "7<lIlI
t
r.
II Plalllled Ullit Developlnent Text
C
L
[ A PROJECf OF:
PREPARED BY: T&R Properties, Inc.
e BIRD/HOUK & ASSOCIATES 6563 Worthington-Galena Road
C Worthington, Ohio 43085
Revised: (614) 436-0000
OCTOBER 17, 1995
t Exhibit B
,...
"-..
-
-
III
..
...
.. TABLE OF CONTENTS
.... I. Application
.... II. Legal Description
.....c III. Development Text
......
~ N Development Standards
..... ~ Exhibits
,...
.. 1. Aerial Photograph
2. Site Context
-
.. 3. Site Analysis
4. Preliminary Development Plan
- 5. Landscape Buffer Details
-
I!IIII
..
..
-
I!IIII
..
..
~
.
...
.. Plallned Unit Developlllent Text
..
..
..
..
..
~
lilt
!IIIII
..
,.
,
~ '"
I
..
-
..
..
...
..
..
-
IIfIII!I" ..~
{,S-
......
-
-
..
..
-
..
-
..
..
-
..
..
..
..
lWi
."",
....
.. Plal111ed Ul1it Developl11el1t Text
-
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
-
,.. ApplicatioN
..
r
- "
-
.-
CITY OF OUDLIN PLANNINC AND ZONING COMMISSION
..
- AN APPLICATION FOR AMENnMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
- OF TilE CITY OF DUDLIN ZONING Application No:
DISTRICT MAP ZM
(Reclassification of I.and) Date FUed:
- Fee Receipt No.
- Received by:
':'h'" information - Use additional sheets as necessary
Please type or print
TO TilE 1I0NORADLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
..........
1N!!M The Applicant T & R Properties
-
being the owner(s),/lessee(s) of property located within the area proposed Eor
- Martin Commons
, requests that the following
-
described land to be placed in the PUD
-
~ A. DESCRIPTION OF LANn TO DE RECLASSIFIED
~ 1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
-iiMlIlJ a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) oE
4M ,
- a recorded plat, with an area of .
b. Beginning at a point along
ft8 (street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
.UlSiII
direction from the (specify) of
- (Street or other), and th~nce having a dimension
,
of from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
.- ....
. \
- c. The tract of land containing Acres and bounded by:
- (specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
- (specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
.liU (speciEy) on the N SEW (Circle)
- (specify) on the N SEW (Circle)
- 00 Attached legal description: YES -/ NO
..
-
-
- Page 1 of 4
-
-
~-"c:o!.
-,-
\~
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8\ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
r..
To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
.,.... other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
fully dimensioned.
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
'_1"-'.,..."", List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
iJllliIIii
'i1W NAME ADDRESS
- (See Attached Sheet)
:;----
.......
~
-
-
,4IiiIiII
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF TIlE DESCRIBED LAND
'i'W 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: 62 unit residential development
,.. with multi-family and sinole family detached housino.
.
--
. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
...... For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application. ~
,
..,. Plans and Exhibits submitted
Plot Plan _____; Building Plan _____; Development Plan ~; Sketch _____;
..
Photographs _____; Other site analysis, site context (specify)
"'M aerial photooraph, landscape buffer details, perspective sketch. and
- preliminary utility.plan.
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
-
- (See Development Text)
-
-
-
-
-
Page 2 of 4
.;\IliI
*--'11; "
~-"~",._~.,."-^ -. ~~._~-~,,"^..-- ,.-----""._"'-~,.....,.~~,.~._-_.._-,-_."."_.,....
-
-
..
- 3. lias an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
- YES
- NO X
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
-
-
lII!\'l!'"
C. AFFIDAVIT
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
...-
'** recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
..
- APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
-
STATE OF OHIO
-
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
..
- I (we) p, ~on{Jd .ScJ'nt-lYlO 'Pr-es'IAe.vJ cJ T....R. PropU+-;e.s L~,
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
- duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included
in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
- and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and that the statements
- and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief. @.~~
~
...
~
T & R Properties
6563 Worthington-Galena Road
Worthington, Ohio 43085
(Hailing address)
... ...
(614) 436-0000 '.
- (Phone)
- Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~~ day of tvk..~ , 19;t.).
- ~ *1Jk~~
-
(notar Pu lie)
.. Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory:
-
(Name (Address) (Telephone)
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not wrIte below thls-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
-
1. Withdrawn Held to
- (Date) (Date)
.. 2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
-
.....'~ 1. (;ftv ~nllnril! n~t(\ "r 'I,.."r;nn
,,_. ., 'W~___"~__~~"'='~~'-_'-_""~""~'_"
-
-
..
.. The applicant/owner herehy ackno\~ledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
- request for PUD hy the Dublin Plnnning and
- Zoning Commission fwd/or Dublin Ci.ty Cound 1 does not consti.tute a guarantee
- or hinding commitment that the City of Dublin ~liU be nhle to provide essential
- services such as water and sewer facilities when needed hy said applicant.
~~ The City of Duhlin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. Jlowever, the rapid growth of the Ci ty of Duhl in aOlI Northwest
'..,,-,,,.&1 Franklin County has stretched the City's cnpncity to provide these services
i.~
to the limi t. ^s such, the City of Duhlin mny he unable to make all or part
-
of said facilities availahle to the applicant until some future date.
-
The undersigned herehy acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
-
- f?LJ \~
-
tJ\wrth d..~ Iqq~
I
.. Date Signature of ^pplicant or authorized
- representative thereof.
.. -=:1tl~Of: @, i1:~
- ^pplicant ~
-
-
..
"'-.
....
.
'18
-
-
..
..
..
..
-
-
-
- Page 4 of 4
-
.......
, ~lAR 27 '95 13: 43 HOCf<ADUl riND A~3S0C P.2/4
:<.w
-MIMI
MARTIN ROAD PROPERTY
~ ADJACENT PROPERTY ADDRESSES
O\IIIIJI
~) PHELE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
- 4051 WEST DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD
DUBLIN OH 43017
~
i<\liiiW B) DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION
c/O EUGENE MATAN
,~ 261 SOUTH FRONT STREET
COLUMBUS OH 43215
~..,.;"," C) GERMAIN PROPERTIES OF COLUMBUS, INC.
~-Il 5777 SCARBOROUGH BOULEVARD
... COLUMBUS OB 43228
- D) CHURCH OF CHRIST ON MARTIN ROAD
- c/O PLAZA PROPERTIES
P.O. BOX 09601
. COLUMBUS OE: 43209
- E) DANIEL F. & FRANCIS L. HUNTER
2964 MARTIN ROAD
- DUBLIN OR 43017
..
F) OHIO TEACHERS RETIREMENT
.... c/o STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT
BOARD OF OHIO RETIREMENT DEPARTMENT
- 275 EAST BROAD STREET
,,_ COLUMBUS OH 43215
~ G) THRIFTY DELTA, INC.
c/o MEIJER REALTY COMPANY
.~- 2929 WALKER AVENUE NW
,. GRAND RAPIDS HI 49504
H) ALA & AYSER KAMOUOI
3125 LILLY-MAR COURT
".OW DUBLIN OH 43017
~-~ I) ANDREAS & DARA SCHUSTER
.,.. C/O TRANS AMERICAN REAL ESTATE
P.O. BOX 267108
~ COLUMBUS OH 43229
'~- J) T & R PROPERTIES
!i_ 6563 WORTHINGTON GALENA ROAD
WORTHINGTON OH 43085
-
1<) DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE FOUNDATION
.. c/O EUGENE HATAN
... 261 SOUTH FRONT STREET
COLUMBUS 08 43215
-
L) BORROR CORPORATION
- 5501 FRANTZ ROAD
P.O. BOX 7166
.. DUBLIN OR 43017
-
.....
,---,.
-
...
-
-
..
-
..
-
....'"
~'Y
....
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
...
..
-
-
"
..
- Plal111ed Ul1it Developl11el1t Text
..
-
..
-
..
-
..
-
....
..
.. ~eglll :Description
...
,.....
~..._........~,.,-." - "~. ~-_..-..-"~.,._,- ____.m_..--,......, ,...'-""'-~,~.=."~.~ .'- -,- "._,_.',- ~ ..'--..,-
- - ~1AR 27 '95 13: 43 HOCKADHl Al'lD ASSOC F'.3,/4
-
...
-
'....
-
~
DESCRIPTION OF 9~893 ACRE TRACT
i_ NORTB OF MARTIN ROAD
WEST OF SAWMILL ROAD
SOUTH OF STONERIOGE LANE
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of
~
,.1ti!ilII DUblin, Quarter Township 3, Township 2, Range 19, United States
Military Lands, and being a part of a 1~.815 acre tract conveyed to
,,~ Martin Road Land Company of record in O.R. 13506 J17 thru O.R.13507
10.06 (all deed references refer to the records ln the Recorder's
~ Office; Franklin County, Ohio) and described as follows:
-
Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said 14.815 acre
"'''M! tract in the centerline with the e3sterly line of Sunny Dale
Estates extended as the same lS shown of record in Plat Eook 24,
,~ Page 110;
Thence North 6025'45" East a distance of 493.66 feet, along
~ the easterly line of said Sunny Dale Estates, to a point;
Thence South 8So36'461f East a distance of 858.47 feet to a
"",.. point en the easterly line of said 14.815 acre tract and westerly
property line of Dani~l :. Jr. and Frances L. Hl..1nte!' 1.03 acre
'~'Ii~'lI tract;
,',VtiJ/ Thence South 6019'17" West a distance of 510.32 .e ' along
.L.ee'C,
the westerly line of said Hunter, to a point in the centerline of
'l$!!!!I
said Martin Road;
Thence North 84030'00" West a distance of 859.00 feet, along
,Ii the centerline of said Martin Road, to the Point of Beginning
~M containing 9.893 acres more or less.
- This description was prepared by Hockaden and Associates,
Inc., ColumbUS, Ohio from existing records for zoning purposes only
- and not from an actual field survey.
- prel?ared = March 24, 1995
-
40347032495Fl
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
.
----'--'~.'-~".---~._,---~-~---"~=~-~. ~~"~-----
" HOCKADEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
,'. CONSUL TlNG ENGINEERS
883 N. CASSADY AVENUE
.. Phone 814 252-0993 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43219 Fox 614 252-0444
-
~'"MlI Z ON I N G EXHIBIT
_iiiCir
-~
,~
~ I fill
~,,,", OEP~~~ IIEDfCNE '"
i:'kt ~ IN\t:~TlJtHT "" .ire. A ~ ~Q
ClPER ES
."""" ~ ~l1J
s~ {fa
~
IJARnt'l ROAD LAND COr,Ip
ORIGINAL 14.1131 ACREs (TO~r,
',-* OiAl~~~ MOROf I
IO~
'..-
~::
- lf11l ~
i~ i "AlmN ROAD lAND CWPNjy
<P:~'l! 'oj
cL .., 9.893 AalES
~ ~
a
"liiW "~CF 8~NlNG
- ...JAf!J!H..!!.oAlr
- -H~'OO. - -
~~'- - -
,
lJ.fE B~ CQ'( rnflfFTY DllTA .
1"'32 A~ORAArON .93 ACREs
OHIo liAOiERS REnROIEHT
...#
"{\,"~l
GRAPHiC SCALI
;;tIiWJ
- C-_,
.....-...
-
-
-
... HOCKADEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
r~ f~T~""1 DATE: J.I).v!". CONSUl:;TING ENGINEERS
.... 1lIt\QlO DA TIlS - IIWRIlS
N.b ~.l.. BY
,,,. REG'S~RED SURVEyOR No.
-
...
. ,
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - May 4, 1995
Page 9
Mr. Fis~ said he wo~ also like ~have the applicantpnsider o~r sites.
2. Rezoning Application Z95-006 - Chakeres Property
~'..... Bobbie Clarke presented this case and slides. The site is across Rings Road from the Ashland
Chemical complex, zoned OLR, Office Laboratory and Research. She said the only obstacle
<I~..... to development of this property is grade along Rings Road for the 1-270 overpass. Access to
the site is only possible at the easternmost point of the site. Ideally, access would be
consolidated for this and the other two surrounding properties (Wheatley and Puckett). At this
time, there is no layout for the site itself. It is zoned R-IA, which is a single-family, one-acre
lot classification. The request is for PCD, Planned Commerce District, generally for office and
hotel uses; including all SO and OLR uses. The development text submitted contains the same
density, uses, and similar standards as are currently zoned for property along the freeway as part
of the Tuttle Crossing development. This application will require four votes of the Planning
Commission to be recommended to City Council.
She said the text contains language regarding commercial or restaurant uses within a structure
primarily devoted to office or hotel 'use, which provides for services such as a news stand or
coffee shop on the fIrst floor. The proposed density is 18,000 square feet per acre, which is the
highest anywhere in the community, but the same as the 1-270 frontage at Tuttle Crossing.
Ms. Clarke said Staff is recommending approval of this application with the following six
conditions because it is an appropriate land use and the PCD is the appropriate district:
I) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70
percent of lot area);
~...4; 2) That right-of-way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general
warranty deed ,(40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;
~""-'i~ 3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to
development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other
driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if
possible;
4) That all private street, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be
designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval
of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the
stormwater management facilities; and
6) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed
by the developer along Rings Road.
Staff believes this application is thoroughly consistent with the long-term expectations for the
area, with the economic development policy, and also COnfIrmS the Thoroughfare Plan.
~
, .
Plannine and Zoning Commission
Minutes - May 4, 1995
Page 10
Mr. Ferrara asked if Condition #2 would affect the slope to which Ms. Clarke referred in her
presentation. Ms. Clarke said no, the slope should already be included within a slope easement
as part of the 1-270 construction.
Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, agrees with all the conditions recommended by Staff.
Jim Houk, Bird and Houk, said he will meet the landscape requirements along 1-270 and the -
setbacks.
.......
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher made a motion to approve this rezoning application with the following
six conditions:
I) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70
percent of lot area);
2) That right-of-way along Rings Road consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated
by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;'
3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to
development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other
driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if
possible;
4) That all private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities be
designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval
of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the
stormwater management facilities; and
6) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed
by the developer along Rings Road.
Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Ferrara, .,
yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Raub, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. ....
(Approved 6-0.)
3. Re~ Development Plan -
.'/
/ .des. The applicant is request" g relief from two of
Mary New mb presented this case and
the con . IOns attached to the approv granted in December, 1994. S ifically, the applicant
does wish to conform with Dubr Lighting Guidelines or the pe Code in the parking
lot. e applicant proposes to add rail to the existing split rail fe ce for screening, which will
no meet the three-foot scree . requirement. The light fIx s are not cut-off fIxtures, and
no footcandle plan has been ubmitted to meet the foot lie requirements of the Code.
According to the Landscape ode, parking lots are to be s eened with one deciduous tree per
40 feet plus a three-foot b gilt continuous screen, whic be a planting, hedge, fence, wall,
or earth mound. A . . urn of 50 percent winter op lty and 70 percent summer opacity must
..
^ ,-,-._-',,~,-~,- 1'_
. ,
Dubl in Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - March 2, 1995
Page 6
3. Conditio Use/Corridor Develop nt Application - CU94-013/C
- All American Brewi ompany - 6258 Riverside D . e
".,.~ 4. Rezoning Application Z94-013 - Wheatley and Puckett Properties
Bobbie Clarke presented this rezoning application for two single-family properties located on the
.-. south side of Rings Road. Immediately to the south of this site is the Tuttle Crossing
development, and to the north are the AT&T Training Center ahd Ashland Chemical. This
application is to rezone 5.284 acres from R-IA, Restricted ,Suburban ,Residential. to PCD,
Planned Commerce District.
The text submitted parallels the development standards within the Tuttle Crossing District at the
interchange. The Planned Commerce District was devised specifically for commercially viable
property, especially along the freeway. Staff believes that the PCD in this case is the
appropriate district and it is one in which the developer makes, commitments in the .beginning.
Staff is recommending approval of this rezoning. application with the; following five conditions:
I) That the Development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B
standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District;
2) That right-of-way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general
warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;
3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be
designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
4) That wet basin(s). be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management
~:W"';i'\!!I; facilities; and
5) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed
~ by the developer along Rings Road.
She said Staff had hoped to zone the whole strip of property at one time, but Staff believes this
will set a good standard for the remaining parcels.
Mr. Peplow asked if the revised text was consistent with Subarea B. Ms. Clarke said there were
no principal issues, but some minor changes are needed.
Mr. Sutphen and Mr. Fishman asked if Ashland Oil Company had reviewed the text. Ms.
Clarke said no and they had not responded to the meeting notification.
Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, agreed to work with Staff to clarify the text as
requested and agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Hale said the property owners were long
time owners of the properties under contract with the Edwards Comp~ny. He said the Edwards
Company had met with Jack Boston of Ashland Chemical over a year ago to discuss possible
uses and was told office use would be preferred. Mr. Hale said he understood some
Rezoning Application
Z9S-006
Chakeres Property
.... History
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' .
Minutes - March 2, 1995
Page 7
improvements to the curb cut would be necessary for safety purposes, but he did not want it to
be a terrific burden on this small property.
Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, representing the owners of the 14-acre parcel immediately
to the west owned by the Pagura Land Company, said they will be filing a rezoning application
soon for PCD and anticipated using the Tuttle Crossing standards. .Hesaid,they were supportive
of this application and had the same concern for access.
....
Mr . Sutphen supported . the rezoning application because the.uses:would be consistent,'with the I
potential . development of the. area, expand the area of the . Tuttle Crossing . District for a .......
. . coordinated high quality. office site, promote traffic . safety, and . the , Dublin. Thoroughfare Plan.
Mr. cSutphen made the motion to approve the rezoning application with the following five
conditions:
I) That the Development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B
standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District;
2) That right-of-way consistent with the Thoroughfare. Plan be, dedicated by general
warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;
3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and stortn water management facilities be
designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
4) That wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management
facilities; and
5) That a left-turn lane and.street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed
by the developer along Rings Road.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr.
Peplow, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Raub, yes; and Mr. Fishman,
yes. (Approved 6-0.) J
5. Rezoning Application 95-002 - Preliminary Deve pmentPlan - Northwest
Presbyterian Churc
Mary Newcomb presen this rezoning application for .59 acres located on the northwest
comer of Post Road nd Avery/Muirfield Drive. The urrent zoning is PUD, Planned Un.
Development Distr. .t and R-I, Restricted Suburban sidential District. The requested zo . g
is PUD, Planned nit Development District for offi and institutional uses. This request s for
expansion and odification of the existing Lo ell Trace Preliminary Development Ian to
include an ,900 square foot churchleleme ry school building. and 27,000 sq feet of
offices. e Concept Plan for this area was proved by the Commission on Jan ry 5, 1995,
and by ouncil on February 27, 1995.
the north of the site is the Red rabue Nature Preserve
ivision.. To the west is the Con larium at Indian Run.
Rezoning Application
Z95-006
Chakeres Property .
History
".
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - May 4, 1995
Page 9
planned to provide additional access or circulation for the site. The subject property is
very visible from 1-270.
0 The site is located on the south side of Rings Road. To the west is the freeway, and to
the north across Rings Road is the Ashland Chemical Company which is zoned OLR,
Office, Laboratory and Research District. To the east are two single-family homes on
~"'-".' estate type lots with a combined acreage of 5.3 acres. A rezoning petition for that land
was approved by City Council on Apri124, for the PCD, Planned Commerce District for
office uses, with a text that replicates the Tuttle Crossing development standards
(Wheatly/Puckett rezoning). Next to these homes is an existing non-conforming
landscape business zoned R-IA, Restricted Suburban Residential District. To the south
is the Dublin portion of the Tuttle Crossing office park which is zoned PCD, Planned
Commerce District.
0 The land generally will be able to be developed for office or hotel use, as is the case
with the Tuttle Crossing office park abutting the site. The specific uses requested are
those of the SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District and the OLR, Office,
Laboratory and Research District. Additional uses listed in the text are corporate offices,
hotel/motel, institutional and "commercial or restaurant uses within a structure primarily
devoted to office or hotel uses." These uses are consistent with both Tuttle Crossing and
the recently rezoned Wheatley and Puckett properties.
0 The proposed building density is proposed as 18,000 square feet per acre. Again, this
level of development is consistent with the text for the sections of Tuttle Crossing
adjacent to the freeway. It should be noted also that the Mt. Auburn Economic Strategy
indicate& Dublin has been developing its commercial properties at comparatively low
densities. That study recommends increasing office densities as a means of increasing
the efficiency of revenue-producing parcels.
0 The proposal includes a Development Text that sets out proposed setback standards.
These are 50 feet for parking and 75 feet for building along 1-270, 50 feet for building
....."4 and 25 feet for parking along Rings Road and 25 feet along internal property lines.
Schematic landscaping is shown along the perimeter. It should be noted that the text
~,'" indicates standards which comply with the Landscape Code (6-foot screen with plantings
along 1-270, preservation of treerow, etc.) Relief from screening along Rings Road is
requested due to the embankment; this does seem reasonable, and the text states this
should be resolved between staff and the applicant. Staff would request that the newer
lot coverage guideline be incorporated in the text, limiting hard surfaces to a maximum
of 70 percent lot coverage.
0 The proposed full service.access point from Rings Road is requested to be located 100
feet from the east property line. Access will need to be assessed at the time of
Development Plan review in light of the development proposed and adjacent conditions
as well as other driveway locations. In spite of the site's wide frontage, more than one
curbcut will not be considered due to the grade for the 1-270 overpass. The embankment
will complicate clear visibility triangles at the intersection as well. Staff would support
combined access for this property with the Wheatley/Puckett properties to the east.
0 If a private street is constructed through the site, the City Engineer will require 24 feet
of pavement (back to back of curb), extruded concrete curbs, a non-inverted crown
design and a pavement thickness equivalent to the minimum residential standard.
"'""~"""
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - May 4, 1995
Page 10
0 The City has established a policy of requiring the installation of left turn stacking laBes
at the entrances to new developments from arterial street that are not constructed as yet
to handle these traffic movements. The intention is to permit the free flow of through
traffic in addition to access for new development. Along the same lines, the City has
required the installation of standard street lighting at the entry to promote traffic safety.
Staff supports these improvements in this instance as well.
0 Sanitary sewer service is available to the site from the north. side of Rings Road, from ..
the Cramer sewer. No open street cut will be permitted across Rings Road. Water will ,J
,~
~
be provided from a newly installed 20-inch line along the south side of ~gs Road. .....
Services are adequate to handle the project as proposed.
0 The Thoroughfare Plan indicates the proposed right-of-way for Rings Road as 80 feet.
The applicant's plan does reflect this correctly. Right-of-way to meet the Thoroughfare
Plan should be dedicated (40 feet from centerline) at rezoning.
0 No indication of stormwater storage facilities have been indicated on the rezoning
submission. While MORPC stormwater drainage design allows for the use of parking
lots for detention, the applicant is strongly encouraged to use wet basins to satisfy
detention requirements and to provide enhanced aesthetic treatment, consistent with Tuttle
Crossing and other high quality office parks. Additionally, the development should be .
undertaken with a stormwater management for the entire site as a unit, rather than as
several separate facilities should the property be used for several office buildings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application subject to the following six conditions:
Conditions:
I) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard
(70 percent of lot area);
2) That right-of-way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general J
warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;
3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to
development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions
and other driveway placement, that access be combined with the property to the
east is possible;
4) That all private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities
be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to
approval of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible
for the stormwater management facilities; and
6) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be
installed by the developer along Rings Road.
Bases:
1) The uses would be consistent with the potential development of the area.
2) The rezoning would expand the area controlled by standards very similar to the
Tuttle Crossing District to produce a coordinated high quality office site.
3) The proposal, as modified above, promotes traffic safety and is consistent with
the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan.
..
-~. ~~ ....-."
. ~
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
MAY 4, 1995
CITY OF DCBLI\
"';".,,~
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regularly scheduled
","" meeting:
2. Rezoning Application Z95-Q06 - Chakeres Property
Location: + 14.114 acres located at the southeast comer of 1-270 and Rings Road.
Existing Zoning: R-IA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township
Classification) .
Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District.
Proposed Use: Office park.
Applicant: Chakeres Land Co., c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio
43017.
MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with the following six conditions:
I) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70
percent of lot area);
2) That right-of-way along Rings Road consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by
general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning;
3) That all Rings Road accessbe subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to development
with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other driveway
m"""'~, placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if possible;
4) That all private street, easements; utilities and stormwater management facilities be designed
consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin;
~... 5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval of
the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the stormwater
management facilities; and
6) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed
by the developer along Rings Road.
· Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 6-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application will be forwarded to City Council with a positive
recommendation.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
{). Y
, ~AAI-- ')11 ' ~jl~
Barbara M. Clarke
>Of"...-.-'.. Planning Director
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission .. .
Staff Report - May 4, 1995
Page 8
CASE 2: Rezoning Application Z95-006 - Chakeres Property
APPLICANT: Chakeres Land Company, c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin,
Ohio 43017.
REQUEST: Review and approval of a Composite Plan and Development Text under the PCD,
Planned Commerce District regulations of Section 1181.09 of the Planning and .,
Zoning Code, to permit a change in zoning from R-1A, Restricted Suburban j
Residential District (Washington Township classification still in force following .....-
annexation to Dublin) to PCD, Planned Commerce District. The requested PCD
zoning would permit the development of office and similar uses on the subject site,
which contains 14.114 acres located on the south side of Rings Road immediately
, east of 1-270, in accordance with a set of development standards.
BACKGROUND:
The Planned Commerce District was drafted and adopted as an amendment to the Dublin
Planning and Zoning Code, specifically to permit the vast majority of development decisions to
be made, for properties with strong commercial potential, at the time of zoning. The intention
was to permit a developer to clearly set out the list of permissible uses, standards for
development, infrastructure contributions, and general development expectations within the
zoning document, consisting of the Composite Plan and Development Text.. With approval of
the PCD zoning, the developer would be able to "take the property to the marketplace, It knowing
exactly what would be required by the municipality in the future. The intention was, at least
in part, to set limits in this new district on the Commission's discretionary authority as compared
to other planned districts, especially the PUD.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have a minimum of 30 days to make its
recommendation on the rezoning requested. the application will then be returned, with the .,
recommendation and bases therefore, to City Council for a second reading at which a public
hearing will be conducted. Following that, City Council will vote on the ordinance. A two- ;~
thirds vote of Council is required in order to override the recommendation of the Commission. ......
A rezoning ordinance becomes effective 30 days following passage. If approved, each phase
of development or each proposed building will be submitted for review by the Commission prior
to construction. Under the procedures established for the Development Plan review, when a
plan is disapproved by the Commission, City Council has the power to reconsider the case and
to overturn the decision. Again, if the rezoning application is approved by Council, the site will
also be subject to future review under the preliminary and final platting procedures as applicable.
CONSIDERATIONS:
0 The site contains 14 acres and has been used for agricultural purposes. There are no
structures on the site. The site is generally flat and open, but it is situated lower than
Rings Road due to the embankment that takes Rings Road over 1-270. There is a tree
line along the south property line. Rings Road in front of the site is still a rural two-lane
section with open ditches on both sides to carry surface drainage. No other streets are
-
,,~.
. ,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meeting
~ ~~~ U
Resolution No. 06-95 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Convey a Right-or-Way
Easement to the Columbus Southern Power Company Which Will Provide Service to
Dublinshire 7 through Reserve H or Dublinshire 6 Subdivision. (Second Reading)
Ms. Boring asked if the utility lines will be underground, and Mr. Kindra responded that they will
be underground.
- There will be a third reading of the resolution at the April 24 Council meeting.
Resolution No. 07-95 - A Resolution Designating April 17 through April 22 EarthWeek in the
....... City or Dublin, Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency. (Second Reading)
Mr. Hansley noted that the Chairperson of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SW AC) is present
this evening to address Council. He added that Ashland Chemical, Washington Township Fire
Department and the Dublin City Schools are all working with the City of Dublin on EarthWeek .
activities .
Tim Harshbarger, Acting Chairperson of SW AC stated that April 22 has been designated world-wide
as Earth Day, and Dublin is celebrating Earth W eek: for the second consecutive year to remind
citizens of the importance of caring for our environment.
Mr. Harshbarger also provided copies to Council of the 1994 update to the City's Solid Waste
Management Plan. He thanked Council for their ongoing support and acknowledged Dana McDaniel
and his staff's support of the Committee's activities and Dublin's Solid Waste Management Plan.
Mrs. King moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat this as emergency legislation.
Mr. Strip seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes;
Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Vote on the resolution - Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. King, yes;
Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes.
Resolution No. 08-95 - A Resolution to Set Forth a Statement or Services to be Provided to the
Area in a Proposed Annexation or 21 + 1- Acres rrom Jerome Township, Union County to the
City or Dublin, Ohio as Required by Section 709.031 or the Ohio Revised -Code. (Second
Reading)
Mr. Hansley noted that a map and a detailed memo from Mr. Foegler was contained in the packet
regarding the proposed annexation's consistency with Council's adopted interim annexation policy.
- Staff will be requesting emergency action at the time of third reading to comply with the date of the
Union County Commissioners' hearing which is May 8, 1995.
-~. There will be a third reading of the resolution at the April 24 Council meeting. .
Consent A2enda Items
Mayor Campbell then briefly explained the format for the consent agenda items listed.
Mr. Strip added that under the Charter, readings of the ordinances or resolutions can be dispensed
with by a two-thirds majority vote of Council.
Mayor Campbell then summarized that the agenda footnote in the future will read that, .Upon two-
thirds vote of Council, the items identified as consent items will be read by number only and the
appropriate action taken to dispose of them.. He added that any items can be removed from the
consent agenda upon the request of any member of Council.
Ordinance No. 22-95 - An Ordinance Providing ror a Change in Zoning ror 9.893 Acres or
Land Located on the North Side or Martin Road; Approximately 150 Feet West or Krier Drive
and Martin Road rrom: PUD, Planned Unit Development District, to: PUD, Planned Unit
Development District. (Martin Commons) (First Reading)
1 Ordinance No. 23-95 - An Ordinance Providing ror a Change in Zoning ror 14.114 Acres or
Land Located on the Southeast Comer or 1-270 and Rings Road Crom: R-IA, Restricted
Suburban Residential District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Chakeres Land n..::.. '.
Company) (First Reading) ,_ ACzonmg Application
Ordinance No. 29-95 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Regulation or Traffic on Muirfield Drive Z9S-006
and Other Roads in Muirfield Village During the Annual Memorial Tournament. (First Chake n-
Reading) . X'es c ~Operty
Mr. Zawaly moved that Ordinance Nos. 22-95, 23-95 and 29-95 be Considered as consent agenda History
items; that Ordinance Nos. 22-95,23-95 and 29-95 be introduced; that Ordinance Nos. 22-95 and
-... Ii 23-95 be referred to Plannin~ and Zoninp' rnmmi.dnn. <>nA th~t t"\r~:~"~^_ ..,_ ...n n.. L _ L _., _
- - ~,_..,_.._~ _.._~...~
!!ill
...
""
...
..
..
-
..
f'I""",
..
'.....
-
-
..
.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
...
-
..
-.'
I
,_~I
".
-
.... Plal111ed Ul1it Developl11el1t Text
...
..
.,
..
iIII
..
.
..
.-
III Development rext
..
",....
...
'-'''' MARTIN COMl\10NS
~~'"' A PROJECf OF: T & R PROPERTIES
H'It.
!IN PUD DEVELOPlVIENT TEXT
...- PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
"'0tlIJlI!! REVISED OCTOBER 16,1995
A. North Point & Scale: See drawing.
~ B. The proposed location and size of areas of residential use, indicating dwelling unit
densities, dwelling unit types, the total number of dwelling units for each density
- area, and the total number of dwelling units proposed in the development plan.
-
The proposed PUD contains 9.9 acres. The total use of the property will be
.. residential with a total of 72 units. The proposed residential units will be a mixture
- of three building types. There will be 1 6 units contained in 4 ranch buildings
(Building 'A') on the western portion of the site. Each building contains four units.
- Along Martin Road are 24 Townhouse units contained in three buildings of eight
(Building 'B'). Finally there are 32 units contained in 4 buildings (Building 'C') on
- the eastern portion of the site. Detached garages are provided for Building 'C' unit
,. while the other units have attached garages. All units will be individually owned
with no more than two units being sold to one property owner.
-
- To establish unity between the three different building types the same building
materials will be used in all buildings. The repetition of materials and architectural
- detailing will create character, scale, and interest among all three building types.
The predominant material will be a warm colored brick while a light clay colored
- premium vinyl siding will cover the remaining exterior. The percentage of masonry
material on all building sides shall be equal to 70 percent brick on each building,
including garages. The siding will be accented with wood trims and shutters. The
roof will be weathered wood composite asphalt shingles (See Architectural
'<'iI!Alt Elevations) .
'>ClJ The overall acreage contains 9.9 acres with approximately .6 ares to be dedicated
... in Martin Road ROW to the City of Dublin (30 feet from center line) leaving a net
acreage of 9.3 acres. Total units will be 72 for a net density of 7.74 dulacre and a
.. gross density of 7.50 du/acre.
-
C. The proposed size, location and use of nonresidential portions of the tract, including
- usable open areas, parks, playgrounds, school sites and other public areas and open
.. spaces with the suggested ownership of such areas.
- One contiguous area has been set aside for a public park. This..:t. 2.325 acre park
will be located on the western end of the site and will act as a buffer to residential
.. areas to the west. Existing driveways will be removed from the park and grassed
.. areas improved to an acceptable standard which meets the approval of the Parks
Administrator.
-
-
..
"""""
_~_--..-.=_.c-..-,____~~~
-
...
-
- Reserve A, containing 0.67 acres, will be utilized as a detention area for the site as
,. well as serve as a buffer between the park and the proposed offices to the North.
The detention area will be owned and maintained in perpetuity by the developer or
- an owners' association.
- A 10' bike path easement will be established along the Martin Road R.O.W.. This
- 8' path is to be staked and approved in the field in order to avoid existing trees and
the existing storm water ditch. A second 8' bike path will extend from Stoneridge
- Lane to the entrance of Martin Commons. (See Exhibit 4 for approximate
locations.)
"'" D. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage facilities,
- including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. All
utility services shall be underground.
-
- All utilities are present at site and will meet the standards of the Dublin City
Engineer. See Preliminary Utility Plan.
~
E. The proposed traffic circulation patterns, including public and private streets and
-
parking areas, indicating their relationship to topography and existing streets, or
- showing other evidence of reasonableness.
>MIl The primary access to the site will be from Stoneridge Lane. 24' wide private
,..,. streets will access all of the buildings while 12' wide private streets will access
areas of four units or less. An 18' wide road will be used along the western edge
- of the residential portion at the request of the Fire Department. These 24' wide
- streets will have 6" concrete curbs. A 24' wide emergency access to Martin Road
will be installed at the beginning of Phase I. This vehicular access will remain open
- only until Marcy Lane is connected with Stoneridge Lane (by others), and be limited
- to emergency use there after.
1 1/2 to 2 car attached garages will be provide for Building 'A' units while Building
'B' units will have 1 car garages. Building 'C' units will be furnished with detached
garages. Additional uncovered parking will be as indicated on the site plan.
;"'
-
F. The proposed schedule of site development, construction of structures and
,. associated facilities. Such schedule shall include the proposed use of reuse of
- existing features such as topography, structures, streets, easements and natural
areas.
,.
... Should this zoning be approved, construction is expected to start by the end of
1995 or the Spring of 1996 and the project will be developed in one phase. The
. road connection from Martin to Stoneridge will be built with Phase 1.
-
.
-
-
-
2
-
-
~"...
G. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the
surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public
.e ,~~, improvements.
The site is surrounded by an existing and proposed office to the North, multi-family
~j residential at 10-12 units per acre to the South across Martin Road, historic larger
c_ lot single family to the West and older transitional single family and retail to the
East.
~
The proposed residential use of this site for condominium development will act as a
good transition from the more intense office, retail and multi-family uses to the
, North & East and the historic lower density single family to the West.
....
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
..
-
..
-
- 3
-
..<,~
".~~~-~ -
..
-
-
.-
..
-
..
-
-
""
~-
.........,.,.
-
-
..
..
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
,..
...
.
.-
- Plal111ed Ul1it Developl11el1t Text
I
-
.
..
~
..
..
-
-
-
.. :Development Standards
-
r-
^ ~~---~-~~ ,
'.
Ii"
,~- H. Development Standards:
- Permitted Uses:
-
1. The residential PUD will consist of attached residential homes.
-
- Permitted Densitv:
- 1. The net density will not exceed 8.0 du/ac. as specified in the Preliminary
Development Plan. See Exhibit 4.
Yard & Setback Reauirements:
....
1. Building setback along Martin Road shall be 30' from proposed ROW or 60'
- from centerline. Pavement setback shall be 20' from proposed ROW.
.... 2. A 3' wide pavement setback shall be provided along the eastern boundary of
.- the park.
~ 3. Setbacks along North boundary shall be 1 5' for buildings and pavement.
- This 15' pavement setback is to be used in conjunction with 1 5' pavement
setback for the office development to achieve 30' of separation.
-
4. Setback along East boundary shall be 1 5' for buildings and pavement.
-
- 5. Minimum distance between buildings shall be 10' for attached
condominiums.
..
- Heiaht Reauirements:
.- 1. Maximum height for structures shall be 35' as measured per the Dublin
Zoning Code.
Parkina and Loadina:
.
..
1. Size, ratio and type of parking shall be regulated by Dublin Zoning Code,
- Chapter 1193.
-
Circulation:
-
1. R.O.W. will be dedicated along Martin Road equal to 30' from centerline.
-
- 2. One emergency access curb cut shall be allowed along Martin Road to the
- South and one road connection through the proposed office development to
Stoneridge Lane to the North as indicated on the Preliminary Development
- Plan. See Exhibit 4.
-
-
-
4
-
Mid:
~-~
.'"","
;,j'tf
:""j 3. Access roads shall be 24' wide with exception of those that service four
.... units or less which shall be 12' and the most westerly access drive which
shall be 18'. Extruded concrete curbing will be provided along the entire
~ length of all private drives with the exception of the 12' wide drives
servicing four units or less.
~
"~ 4. Final location and design of all access roads to be subject to approval of the
Dublin City Engineer.
-
Waste and Refuse:
1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a
~ solid wall or fence. See Preliminary Development Plan (Exhibit 4) for
approximate dumpster locations.
...wt
~ Landscaoina:
"~ 1 . All landscaping shall be according to Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187.
- 2. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. See Tree Survey Plan
for trees to be preserved and removed. All trees to be preserved will be
protected by snow fencing placed at the drip line prior to the start of
~. construction and maintained throughout the construction period. (See Detail
- Exhibit 5).
,~ 3. Every tree removed during construction shall be replaced with a minimum
r'W 2.5 inch caliper tree. Any tree planted within the park area shall be subject
to the approval of the Parks Administrator. See Tree Replacement Plan for
- proposed location of trees.
-~ 4. Street trees will be provided along Martin Road in accordance with Dublin
Street Tree Program Standards. Street trees along Martin Road will be
placed at 45 ' on center while street trees along internal access roads will be
placed a maximum of 30' on center where parking permits. See Exhibit 4.
-
5. Along western boundary, all existing trees shall be preserved.
"...
- 6. North landscape buffer shall include seeded or sodded mound with a mix of
ornamental and evergreen and shade trees. One shade tree shall be planted
- for every 40' of lineal boundary and evergreens will be planted at 10' on
- center. In addition, earth mounding and hedges will be utilized as necessary
to create the required 6' high continuous opacity. The 15' setback along the
- northern boundary will be used in conjunction with the setback along the
- southern boundary of the proposed office development to the North to
create one unified landscape buffer.
...
7. East landscape buffer shall include a continuous seeded or sodded mound
- with a continuous screen of evergreen trees placed at 10 on center. Earth
- mound shall be 3' to 5' in height. This treatment will meet a 6' high
-
5
-
..
",*,,''lI
l III ~-"'.--'-_.
continuous opacity.
"' 8. Landscaped entry feature shall be provided at the entrance from Stoneridge
. Lane along the northern boundary of the site. This entry feature shall
contain a small entry sign and ornamental plantings including flowering
'1~ shrubs and/or annual and perennial flower beds.
. iiiiii'
Detention Area Maintenance Standard
'i~'_
1. Grass within detention area will be maintained at a maximum height of 6"
and mowed at regular intervals in conjunction with the maintenance of the
residential development.
-
2. Grading of the detention basin will be determined by the civil engineer based
~ on storm water calculations. The basin will be designed to eliminate
..... standing water when not being utilized for detention.
...... 3. All grass, landscaping and grades will be maintained in perpetuity by the
developer or an owner's association.
'4IJIIii'
!~ Lightina:
':iIiiiIiiI 1. External light fixtures may be pole or wall mounted, dark in color and of
,"1'II!l\t similar type and style.
.~ 2. All lighting shall be cut off fixtures.
- 3. Lighting along parking and roadways shall be limited to a maximum height of
..... 14'.
~ Fences and Walls:
1. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted.
o~~ Architecture:
,~ 1. Materials to be used on all buildings will be limited to the following:
~
VINYL SIDING
-
"'- Journeymen
Double 4 (Dutch)
- Color: "Clay"
-
or
-
-
~
c_
6
-
-
~;.""J!1
'''lit! '__"~'_~_~'_''''_'~__"'_____~~'M"
-
-
-
- VIPCO
Presidential II D4
- Color: "Clay"
-
(or equivalent)
"""
- GARAGE DOOR
."~ Color: "Clay" (Match Vinyl Siding)
BRICK
..
Merry Brothers Brick
- 11-400 Shenandoah
- Size: "Princess"
- (or equivalent)
-~
SHINGLES
-
""""- The Elk Corporation
Raised Profile
iNIIIlliI Color: "Weatheredwood"
......
or
~iiaillI
Celotex
~ Dimensional 1/25 Shake Shingle
- Color: "Weathered Wood"
- (or equivalent)
SOFFIT & FASCIA
,- ALCOA
Color: "Pebblestone Clay"
"folllilll!
- (or equivalent)
- GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS
- ALCOA
.. Color: "Pebblestone Clay"
- (or equivalent)
..
-
-
-
7
-
-,-'-'
~,,,-,,- ,,!~
~'-"''''''--'''''-,"<~-~-'~"'.
>~
-
-
,.
- WINDOWS
4MI Color: "Sandstone"
-
(or equivalent)
-
.- EXTERIOR TRIM
Glidden
Color: "Tomorrow's Taupe"
or
... Olympic
.~- Color: "Olympic Taupe"
J" (or equivalent)
"~
EXTERIOR (Front Door)
~
Glidden
If\III!Ill'lI
Color: "Shady Blue"
,~
(or equivalent)
-
,~ SHUTTERS
0.. Alcoa
~~ Vinyl open louvered
Color: Blue
,.~
(or equivalent)
-
.,-
.-
,....,.
-
...
..
-
-
-
- 8
..
.'4j
....
-
-
-
....
-
....
-
... '~..
..
.f'~
-
....
-
....
-
....
-
-
-
..
-
-
....
..
i
ill
'.
.. Plal111ed Ul1it Developl11el1t Text
....
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
..
- exhibits
Iloo
..
. . ,
, . 'I I'
i ~ .-:.. ~ '*'
....~,'* f., .~ f,
*
~
'"{
.
.
. .
.
..
.
,.'
f.
\
-, "
:;
" , t
f 1
"
~
. ~
,t :
...
\
,.'1"
". ..~ l\~"~
' ~ f
'\. ' ;', '~~
""~ '
. t~ t:;,. ,
~ .
-
.,_.,
..~-~-_._._-----
~~~.~
t1J ~ .; i!
f-< 1-01 jl~i
~ ~ dh
u
t.il g
f-< N
-C'-)
CIlZ .
III 0:5
O~ ::i'
~ ~ ~~
~~ ....)
~~. o~
00..
L u:
z;
OVOll "I~MVS ~ I
SORI'1010:> dO .I.J,I:> ~
-----------------------------,------------ ,------- ~
NnROO dO .I.J.I:> t <C ~
Q ~ ::E
<( :r:
i ~
~ I""\~
- ~-
U ~ U~
U t.il ~ t.il
p::; p::;
1
,
, I ~
" I
" SilI.L1HI..01l.. 1111'lMVS NnRno I 0 ;:
~~ ._____________________A____________ ~ ~ ~
~,I ~ ~t.il
~ '" I ~ ~ p::; It ~
O..J', I ~:i;
tJJ ",' ~ II! I ::l
~~_ r.n ;> ',I -( li acl
~.... tJJ " I Z ,-.. A t.>.,
.... 0 " I "'-
~,.... z '... ~ '-0 :I:u ------------------~ ~ )
~,=> ,,,, - !: ~
......" ::l L.. #OJ U -
..~_ Ix .. '""" . , u
,.., , I~ i: ::> .~o.'.~y.uw'l )
1""\ _ ~~,~./.,'" 1< _ :I: --
~ .... ...""1I Ii: L.. U
~ ~ '...~ 0 I!: ---- .. ",
. ~ .. ..., '" '" CIl - , 'C
'... ~ t.il ~ ~ Z ~ I --
~, ___... P::; I 0 - __~lIi1H!)OVO N · HI OVOll lI3IlI)I
'~~..- ~ '" J
"""""... ..(] - -------.!i!..L~~~J~:Wn10.) "0 ~ I --
~ -- -~V~lIi1!) t
----....:_ - _ ~ .iI.LNOH .I . 0 ~
~- -----------T----~---------------- ~
--_,'" . .' ". ~"'. . ,. I..... ::I:
..... . .... . ., ~. . . aJ ~
Z I,'. , . , ., . ..!!': . , -.
I 41( I.,. . . . " '. . f- ...... .
I I..J I" . , I1J -u
'. . '" '0::' CIS
," . . ~ 1""\ ~""'-
" ," D:: J....4<='
:' .,-... . ~ ::>~"
,.,. 0 .. , U
,... ~ .' < _N
I I : '. .. '. " ~ ~ E-:o ~
~ tJJ. j:l.,.. ..' . 0 ;.JOI
;: t.il 8 I ' ... . ~ '. : ~ ;:J 8-'
E-' U - I t.il ,., , . -(. . . --l ~
.., - llG U ,. . - . I
- ~ tJJ _ .' L.. " '.
#OJ Z 'T I~' , ." . .
'""" OJ ~ 0 - Z '.
I z: ~ . : . .
I U 0 j t; 0 . t.il . ... <
~ 0 l'~. ~ 8 . : @
~ ::1:, ::> 0 r .'. t......CIl ., 0 0 1
o z: ... U 'T' r-' .., . J' I
<( I1J OZ: / _. ~ - . ..... >-
~ - en .', .' 0 t:
o t; !i z: ~ 0 ',' r.n P::; . . llG <<
llG I1J 11J5: ,., 1>-' '"' . :z:
> ~~, >- - IZ: . I-l. . ~
z: ~ < I z: 0 ..,. ---
_ '" 0 < I:: , ..' - .. . .'
-' <!;.L P::; ::1:' CIl. .' II
-' L. ::1:,., 0 ' 0
< I1JO 0 - U . . . . I >:!
- -- --.. -- U 0: j:l., '. : I ;..J
o ,z: . '0 .. -
~ 1< . , . . '0::'
....) I....) .. P::; , .'. ,.t:;
o 0'" j:l., . . c(
1< < . '-'" . . fT.
O 0 . .' -
fT' "'. .
1""\ - '" z:,..' .'. L t.il
~ U ~ Ii: '.. ,. ... .~. '" 1
::> _ ~ I"'".. . 0 _
~ .: <.. .... .... ......... ..:-. u
'T < ::1:' . .' '. . , .. . .' '" 0
~ ::E .... ........... .. .. .. , .... ..... 0
P-i 0 ____________LL.._..__________ ~ ~ ~
:z:
Sill.LlIiI..Oll.. .LNill'l.LSiI^NI illi1H..
---------------------------------------- "~~Hr
tJJ -
..J
= 0 >:!
~ ~ ;..J .iI.L1VMOO 1 . ......
J' _ ..lIVHS .. . r _ .....,
a: -- - - 0 - ::; :::
o ~ oJ':Z '0::'
'Ot.il :-<.. - ,.t:;
~ C'-) > ~ ~ ~ iI:>.JOlIlIV.J 11 c(
~ t.il ~ t.il <( ~
:J n ..lIVHS r ~ ~ ..,
o - -- - 0 -
~ Z _~nOH1V') 0 · .) G
~ ~ Z
~ -
~ ~ t---"" Ul
-- -- -- m.o ".. ~ I ""."".,," ,. ,
z: I
~ , I
- I
...-_... ..'...M,W......... ,.._..
....... _ c:: p1" '" P'''.... ___ __ .. . .. '" Ii'.. ,.......- _ ...... ...... ........ -'
--.. '. .' . ....' ,;",iI ......~ "'...~_,>,,''',.,,'tJ...... ....,.~ __ _ .. '" ~.... ....... ~~........ ...... ..,,,..... ~ .......
'~
- ~.,:!._- ~. _..,.--.~,_..-
_."_,_~C
I
ttl ~~1 i!
l ~Ilt!
~ V'J !
III '),I ~ ~ .~
....:l(/) ,~t; "'Iii
OE-o \ ~iii ......
Z 0 ."'=:4 ~ c ~
en ....:l I ~ c.::
.O~ \ oui
z~ . ~
,'" 1= ~ 1", Z i:
~~e (/) ~ C 0
i\U~ - ~ ~1IJ. t-l,.
'I." v CICI~ ~.
~~r ~ --
~~ ~ ~g. ~
~- ~ ~t' . ~ ~
t , -
i .:1:.
"'... ~
/ ~
~.~ ~
I i:;i '. ..... '\. -. ". ~.t.~...
~~ . ~ .
~~ ,~/ __________ :r '~~~
.'~ ______<~.___ . .., I i:1:1i
, ,
/ f .~.;;
I~eec (
/. /II~ ~~\ 111
'_I~ z
, :3
..'
I:: 1I1~ "
~\ ..:a ~ ~
!f 1IJ 'C ;.J
t~ .. I; S1
, J \~ ~ E ~
,:L' ~tt ~ - ~
III ' ",...,,, " r;
U I ~~ 1IJ ~
_' \ """ ~ ;:J
~ ;~ ~
o '
o
o z
z -
- " I-<
I-< ' ~
~ ' -
- ' ~
~ __ III
\.lJ
I -- \ ----, J
':'" ~~a
ti-z
-z
" \1...' ><<<
." .~ 1IJ ",:l
----
oJ f (
"'<
I ~~
~~ ....:l
~~~ <z
iZ~ ~~g
_w~ ~E-o(/)
~ ti9C1C1 ~z~
;z: :co-;<~ ~Ill>
O Cl. '" 1IJ ex: ~ 0 ~
<1IJ ~~~
i= ~~ Cl. Z..Ji ~ tl)j:Q
~ 211J ~ :s:~~g ~i:i t1Jt1J:J
~ 15:j': 0 2:1~< t=,. "''''
1IJ 0 :s:~ 1IJ . U
6 ~~ :;;! z ~ \'!~~ffi~ ~i~
1IJ ..JZ 0 _ 0 lIJuO~ex: ",00
>< u..- Z E-o {;) Z ~uUo..J <uz
I ,."' ,,~ r:: Z - 1= "iL\,!..>= ..t;< .
!: ~..J ~ UJ > ~ ~u..1IJ1IJ:l 1ii1lJ~0
. '" 0 <( ~ ~ r.' ...... · ·
'" - ex: ..J Z ..... ....
~ 0:. ><u 1IJ1IJ ~ ~ (/)
\lJ +t 1IJ< ~o
.. .
p'- -.... ...."',~ -,
C~ _'" r."... _'.' · -- - .. ~ .... - II> --.. -... ~- ........ - -
- "'-- - - - - ~ - - . . ..., - -,.., -... -.... _....... --
(f}b ",I II
~ z I-
Z:::g <( ~ co I
Og, 0: ~:I: I
'oo:::! (j bZ ~~t ~
~ > .rr."
W W >o~
~ ~ . ~ ~ Cl :::g ~~~
II) II) 0 0... Q '" t:i:
~~ ~ ..> O:;j 3 .aJ~ t'
'" '" 0 <C - W o~ r
o -!.~ _ % 0 U b > I j..,
<( +... + ... Z 3.
. '0 :3 e ~ w w ~o
00<( 0 - ..... ... ... Cl Cl 8. ~"g
~ ~ C'! r! ffi a ~ :;1 ~ Z - A! r.8
. '(I)' U. <0 ~ IX .... .... if) >-- .eel
i i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ f;1 ~ ;: ~ ~ : i : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :r!
-- 0 1-:;) CD 0 ... Z II: ..,t. m J
;!.;!. Z iC 0 0 :;) '" L......... Cl .. ::: 0; ~ -
II) II) 0( III 2:.. >- 0 C> c--'....,. ... ..~- I I
!::!.!::!. Z W '2 II: I- u ei w "'" . I
00 0 (J)UJcn O::::J Cl.w ..... W > (f) - e:
W W ~ !::!::!:: <( III ~ l!I15 ~ 0 ... ~ 0 (j JI.,II ' II ~
Q;Q w zzz 5;~ lIIo. ;;z >- a 0 .-..-r4 0... 0:: · I' ~'--i
. ='> I- ::J::J::J W.. ~o C> ... ... ~ _"~
~ O~ fil~ ~ ~[D9 ~z fila:~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ::s ~ 0... '.--lls
r-, a: 11. a: Cl Cl Cl 11. 0..... Z VI 0 0 0... it .
.." a: III >- ww 0 ~ ZZZ::J W>!!! lII.. .S! >< '" '" UU:
..... . ...... 00 lL ::E 5--..J '-';C!~..- G:.:l ... Q. Q.
e o~ z (ij ~~ Ui CI :!;l;l ~ CI 8~ ...,:, j~
W <(zo ::J ffi lIIlII ~ !i iiliiliil ~ z ~~ ~:!. 0(01 0 ~
.... ..u:::<( ;c! 0 ffi~ lJl 9 it oi.i G:.:l
- b~1ii b Iii 11.11. w:5 ~ l5 ~ (:') C) ~ ------+ \
en ...::tz ... z 00 a: III Go Z --- . I \
I
I
I
I
o __
z --
- is
SJ::!
r"'l ::J '"
'-' a:l z ~
% ZI- ~ ::: ~
~ ..... LL. 0( ..
~ a 0 '-' ~ /'""',
u ...J 0 ~ I "-
. ....J -'~ ~....- -- I '.
~ ..... t "'~ I ~... i - -- ! '-...
! :J z ~ t. I i~ i
ci CQ ::> ~ ~~ i''' ...i
~j I : 00 ~ I ~j ~i ..; : .!
1 0 I ~~ i = 'i g g
I I je i :! %
. - ,. ~ J Q lL ,
--------..,. --' --.L:.:":", '~-..- - ,.cc..-,-.~,-", . - r CI)
. , . ........., .01 ~ ['. _ UJ
-... - ~ Cl:)~
"'___n____ - 0
. O~
. Z:>
I ,I ~ I -:>
I Cl 0
~i:: '. !"c -~.-. ---~~--:: g ~
oS J .... Cl:)'::J
I , ...... J:<,
" 'I.~ l .. - U i
~ J- ~ .. ''l;-- o-Z'1l.
"I' .1 z~,
i:: ,eo, ..... c:C
.s Clb
en x ,~
t I- ..... Zij
, I ~-5'::1~
'0" ,~ Cl:)' ~ J
'"
~ I
~ -
j --- --l
i g ~
~ ~I ~ - ~__~___,~ ~ .
= I ~ . Vt ~ ::;
o I Q.. = ;JJ :.:~
! 9 'le . ~~
;I W ',0 ':-' z J: l
- > \1 ...., _,...
: lAI - ~ - ---- -11 ~ <C :::: l
~ 0 ' U 3' z >- I
II) W U .81::. >- _ ~ I
Co U C W . r-
~I ~~. . E "!_ ~r' ~ ~ ~ I ~
., , : 0 -<t ffl~ --- ~ : < I L. .
'" a. . 0 k .>J _ ..-:,
- ~ -,-" - ~. ~ ,.. I . ~
o w ~~
"%g Q. .z", I ;. " .
o ~e ' ( I
~, ;~
-... I
(. --~-,. >: : I
( ""c. 1
~ .
,,::
Jl it r -~--1 -----
, II t
! 'to
--i""' --~
- - bf- :+:-- -',--,+ ~
1t'69~ ,r- I .~. ~-- ,: ----- -~--
I, " I i
r" '
i _ _..---__
:0&9 ......:!. . .". -
: . . ". ,<,.., ..'
. ""'~~I'.
1 " '...0,';.
I.~ I I ' · "l>
; ", 00" .~' ',~. ,'".; (
. . 1 ," '.,J "'f .
i 1 . ','~: :: >-, - ,~:~::t: ' . <:::::~-@--<3
! " ~ '{!Ji; \\
~ . . ' . !
. . ~
'I .. - '" : 8
I -- ~- ) ~
< UJ I -~_.
;0" ~ ~
UJ ~ :1 I ~ ."
> u ~ /' c;::: 11:-
'" '" 0::: '" 0 0..... ~ ~ "
-..,/. '0
~ UJ ~ ~" ;.iUJ I .)i 0
,^ ' u ~~
.." 0 UJ > I- ~,> I
UJ a:u 7.~~ ~
0::: b~ ~::iri
00.. ~I-f --- ~
Z u o(~::
/' -.0 01 <1-_
..... I- ~c~
"y ~g ~;jl:j
....-- --'"
" cal.l.,~
\ 0"' - "'., '" ", ,co ,.". ",,, .. ,
JII"" ... II..'.....'" ,.. _ ..
~ .. It;'~:: C:~ t:. "" _: :: ,.:= .. C;';J : ~ : : ::: :-.,~ _ ::::'~ : ~ ~~'::
'+"<""~_._ ..LJ 1'",..,,- ".:""-:."",..;.".,."'"""",,,~;-~^,,,-j', ~'--""""""~'-"_'~"-~'1li'W~'~~~,"'~""'."'~-"">-
C/)
.....l ~
Cl u..l<
w
--' o....f-
--' ~ ! ,
~ <u..l ~~ . ~
"'w UO
~w
w'" r.r. C/)~
",f-
OQ ~UJ OuJ
f-~ c:Cl. ZlJ..
Wf- <<
v!!! r.l; <lJ.. C/)
Zx -Vl .....l:J
0 ~~ Zo Zv.
:J ZO ~Z CO u..:
Qw r.n< o~
c.. f-Z t-...J
V-
:>--' ~~
...J "'0.. ...J :J...:Z
wt;~ ~ iJ.,;-
< f-Z ~~ ~~
- 00f- W
ZV-<: 0 ....l::)
f- Z ....l0 O~
Z 0 <I..L.
UJ ~ J:O. U~
0 r.n r-
~(\ > ,_ >- 00
C/) a: z!:::= Z~
w ~~ W w c::: Uo: l<-<--1 f-
III oJ
0:: "'0 W'" <{ >- UJ ~~
tiN a:~
Z UC!)b::
0 Q.O ~~
V WI- eg :I: < V)
: J WI- Z t-:I: <t:'"
a:0 <{o:U t-
... z ...JO . c:c ~
.. I..L. UJ -
M :J...:....l 0 :I:
t- ....l1;:; 0 X
:~J~fl:";~:':~!~':~i~ :J <VlU ;L
z
-,U'-- . ",1.1 ,".
.. .f\:.;~JI~'~ <i;il;;:,"Jr
Ii'
, . "
:>l
U
<
UJ 0 C!) .
uJ z t-
o: 0 uJ ~l
t- V)
;J.l z Z!=' 0
;J.l uJ ::):I: z
::z:: uJ 00 0
t- 0: ~-
uJ ...J
UJ 0 :I::I: ::) I
o 0: E-
-< uJ 0: \r, 00
> <.' \n I
~ uJ uJ:: -
. ' ;'j'
:1
--
r.r. 0
~ Z
u.; 00..: i
c: ,
t- Z>- I I
- z ::)t-
I.J..) OE-
u.; ~:I:
0: :I: 0
o < E- W
0: O:J: I
t.L! <{~
> u.J~
u.;
~" ,.- ~
v
<
c:c
<:GE-
l!.:
Ov:
~O
:>lz
0:-
<0
Cl.:::
\r, ::)
- ~
I .
V'l
..1J
V
<:
:I: ::z::
E- <
lJ~~ V
~ c:
ZOuJ u r- ;L
o:~~ < z v:
<E-::) C!) u..l ~
U<oo E-
V) 0: uJ ~ ::z::
OO...J V'l
Z;J.;~ lJ c..
<E-E- Z 0
...JZz ~ ...J
uJ::J...: c: u..l
~::::e < >
tL,.....'J; c... u..l
i.1..vilJ C
",E-o: - 0
~~
u..l
U
-
[.L "
[.L
0
WJ WJ
~
~ --<
<r:
U~ U~
:I:C/)WJ C/)WJ
~Q~ ~Q~
~Z~ i:? C/)Z~ '7
- <r:<t::J -
O<r::J II II
" WJ~CO "
Z~r=o - -
N
T""
!
II'" "... IIIII!I!"~.' .... ""
c::: E:,::: ~.. .,~ c:: ... '" r::I .. ~ ... .. ... '''ll , ::*.~ :~~~ :-'~ ~ ..~ ::.~ ~i
......... -,.- ... .. .. ... ..... .,",""", .....".. "v....
.............._- ,J-~...._i""',.""''''''"~".'"''''''"'''''';~~._;;,\.'''''-"'''~''''''''.~'.''.i-:', ".'~"'''''''"-'''''''':--'1''-'< ~H"">~M"'!,..""t"'i'.="""""" , .- .."";,,,,,.,,,,,,",,,,..,,~..~.,.".,..,,..,.~-,. ~
I
rn~ ~I 11'1
Z~ ~
:::s ~ - f r
00.. z ~ R r
~:3 <: I~' 1IJ
~ ~ ~ ~~i
~ w i~'
~ 0 >- 3"': I
0:;1 ~ ~ J .. I;I~ i
u 5 bits I
o >- P, I
Z~ g H5
~ ~ :::s IJl t- I
~ 0 ::3 ~i.~ ~p
0:= ~ ~ ~ nlU 'u :
< c.. t 'L, I
~ ~ i Iii} i
~ c.. c rut
I
I
I
1
I
- I
I ~
J" \ I ! !
) , "~; ! ~ ~
----/' 'l-" I I ~
_____ -~ -----~.;;;-,...v-V"V"'-_J tr"D.L It. .LI,&:..r s :
~'1 -- -- -- -- - ....
':iijQ~ _ .....,I'.../-A...JJ-^-^-'.J../~....A.J-'-J....J~ ~ I
~qncr I
~~~~ I
I ~ ~ I ,
:::: I I , I I
III - ~---:----{-- I
~= - I I I
- I i I
I I
Il --r- --r- I I
I I I
1: I I , I
~I --'-- I II I I
.B < I --,-- ,
rn ~ I I I : 1 I I
.. -<. I I I I
o ~ __L_ --'-- I . I
- lID I 1 :
- I I I I I I
- I , I ,: ~5 '
f , t I
- ! --r---,----{-- i \ I I
i I, - I , I : I ~~
I ~l&: f II "I : ill !
w g ~ I : ' I ~ll
; 5,' ~ '! "t' ,: I If
Is '::Z: I c~
~ , I i ""t ~~~ .
!I ,~ ,I I ! I
! ~ ! _ I /: I if ~n
-, II' 0 I i
~I lie. ,
: I I': I : I
'! ~ I t I
. ! ! i :
- : I
II:t II
~ I ,
i I
--- I I
- ,---=- ~- - - -
- - ,- - \ - - --:- - - ,- --:- - 1- - - I
'''"''' \ ~ ~ I ~ . .,.. ~ i: I
- - - - - 4"'1 -+' r;-.. ~":- ~ ~ -. -'I '
~e---- _____~ ~I.:.I ~ ' .,
. I - - - - - ..- 'I I
'I -" ~ ..J
I .(.. I -~----p- 0 .:1 _uu --------- I
! I t<~ '0 r;\ F:\' 'Ii I
I q 'I V -0 ~ ~\:..? 'I i
'I'll -0 '
,: ~P-I: "..' : i I i
!:n I -0 "'0... ' ! I
I I) ! · '~0' '.0 ~0 I d I I
:/ I -'F:\ : I ~ .
i : ~ 1'1
I . \ '.. I I
i "'1 '---- 'I""'lI · ."1 - I \ I 2
i - - -- -- -_ _ -}'
e9-.n ] .~.~Z"D "-~ -- I
: T . ~
I .
I e I,
I 5
i 0 I
I .. I
: i
.. I
II
I M>>OS 31!;JlIH .J I .:JIJ '.::05sY lJo'f JalYlOOH 1;661 11111;1 0( 6", P.. NI1!l1'II\I'~O'\lJrred\:J
,." .....
P""'II! ~ P ..... If' '. r.'."""I ___ rr .. t. "." " ... '11! p "" ...., _. ....",........,...
~~ ...... ~'.M 1Mtit.-, 4iI"", -411 ......d,.~ ___ ...,,. "'" -41 ,_ ".,;Jj ~ .. __. "- .. Ii nil. _~."
""""",;!(Iffl_i.,,~~~..:+"'...... ... ""'~"'~~"''1''''''~.''''':''':->-'''~""i-,:j.;,,"._,,,.,
---_.~--~-------~--
---------~-- ------ - --...-
---
---~---
----~-
I
o ! ~ ~Il!
UJ 0 . ~ !~.,
~ ~ ~ ~~ hi c
UJ 0 ~
(/') ~ ~ 0
UJ UJ u.:l ~
~@ ~~ ~ en
'" :> z.
UJ~ UJo VI o~
"" III """ 0 UJ '" I
. ~<< ......UJ _.
~ . 0'" 0'" ~I- v,"
.... III III 0::... III
Y.l< f-<~ f-<~ w ~
..... VI '" '" ~.
UJ VI ... ... .lo:::::C 0 ~ VJ
0:: UJ UJ l3 UJ l3 ~ 0::
I-U UJ~ u.:l~ o~
u.UJ ~... ~... 0::
o~ f-<~ f-<,=- u~
:I:- .. l-
". '. ~ '" "-.. 00 Z
",.,~::;~:W, . ;"J..... ,~ Ii:
.'0'00 Cl I <S! rT"l. + 0
'd 11.: :1. 3, '0 WI UJ '4.. ~ ~ ~
., '-'Zl ... ...I ~ L... u
. ,,",';" a;" ... ~ r-' Ul
. :=' w C(, >- UJ ~ 0
" ~,..Ji !: 0:: ~ f ~
. It- ; 0:: Cl ..... ~ c ...
---------------.. '~0, J UJ Z I-' ~ ~
-- a..-.., f > < - lo:::::C . z
1/3J.N:i tlll/q: ". .. . _.' . , " " " '0 ".. . CD ~ .
---,:,:,'~ON/7ft'f).' --"".>".-^'^-",. ., """, '"."'.:I:
-----.:..~~ Q'j a,,! -..-, _~>. _41 '. , ..'(- " ><
,... --~ -.,of.... ~ "" '.! uJ
/ '. '. '. ,>, I .I'-r-
i 1 '; it/'~-;'"", ",'H': ..:!:' o. ,....: <:- t:;::~~;: .i~,~.:~r~:}: ;:~;" .iIt- ~;i; - ---.. '.
r . ------ "'l I 0 ~...--'- -, ,', ;,. , I
'-" --- --_'" _--- - ,. ........ ~.,.,"\, ...,./1:,...
l>..s ....j,.'.. ,,'.,_......J-:;,~ ':--"-'___ ~< Q' '; b: -- ,I . '.. . .:.,; ,'" 1 '" I
., ", , \, . i....:.... . .1.J<~'.u -~~,'~;.~:~~~;;D.:~H.,~.;}~; 1;: i
. ".--, '. -.7 '. - ,'. .,-, i f.J c..,,,,
,;''t;~ . : __~-_,/ ,>./-- . I -':""'" ____, ,:' - '.>' '. .:: '~~_~;:~, ,ji"', ._,
, -~ J "" -' '>, - ~ . 1.f 5
\., ,," '. ~~------:c~__-- .,....,..(..~:. .~\, ~'\~J/i;':.;;
, , . ~~ .. - --.....i.'.... ",.. -. -r"" c, ;?J "'-
\. '. . / '."J <.. ...: <'~'):... ,."", ,.:;.? <~ '; /' - t/l'
~ -.__. " ,'...-.1, " :<? ._,' ' -~.":/"'. '1 c' .
< '\,;; . "'1, "_~ ----- '. h__.__ u__~.... ,.~ I
: ,~' :. // '. J: _~,,;: g .'\~, ~:'," '::~,~~(?~~(}:. :':t;>:
". '" .".' 1 ", -(;2,% f.:'r:' ," '-V-" - "
:
',J.. -. . Z" , >t:- -,-- , 0' '0' "." , ~. "\. ,;
" -' "IJ ',,'.' U -- --- - . .0' ." ' - "-c' " '..
'<,....--.>- . >---- "~'. . ---- .,--".' '. . . ~ 0,;.... '>"'.'~~. '< I:'t};,..
. . '. .~e .' (!/JJl) .. 'z ".;.,
". , " /'/'. ''''0' . "," '----'_.,;...: :~~,i/<',:
<.0.,:;, -------..,..0 . .' 0 ~ Q."" ." iir:....,
'.0 ~.~ O' .' 'ct,. ,
""', , '.-- .' 0 ~. . '0' ~ "'~
' '" , '< '" '. .~,. ", '. .... ' :': :'. "0 ~G" :;>~/"""~', ':.;:;'i~:~ i ;
.",--., Uv 'A ,-e ......:-__-- '/..,,' . ~
-- .. ' "'~ ' O:v,."'...-~~.. '>' -'.'-~,.:;.";;,~!~, '~
.--.-.-., 'u__h '. \;;.I r.>\ . ".".
~ ...-~........-\.)~v....-:~.-,.v ,___..' ~ '.. ------ -________ ...-- .. ':!. .. ___I __".....v '_. J,-:,'.':"'I'-'.';_~--;",,;
l . o'.............-,-..-!-l:"_'l..='Fs;Jl .. , , '-.. e -1 ,_, -J"'l\;J,.
o " '~"""""r.-,.,~,-.. " '. :./ 'P~~l( ;(ft~{
03 . . (;) 1l~n"8 'f ;.... : - .-/'/ / ': ~ ...; ,~
:!~ I t.: ; _. ^'lfa~3Hcf 39 OJ. MOlf 33 - , " 'lr, " ,,': .~
- ~"" ",--.j':; r~ lfJ.. , ~.: _;"."~...;~_:-~--
I .. I I I
... I "
--~_.':<":"!_~ u --t.."!. 1. t tft'4
" ~ - " . ~
~~ .:.. " ,0-
r~:"I. t }:1.J...,
o ,'~'
~ ~.~'~
..J
i5
"'w
~w
UJ'"
......
O!l
1--
UJt;
!i-
~~
~~ ...I
t;z -
~::; ~
) ~... ~
UJ!;;ii: UJ
l:::~C Cl
~u'< Z
o
~
>'
~ ~/\ tx:
r.~ - ( ~ w
~~ gUJ ~ ~
t;UJ e:~N ~ ~
~... g w:::
u wI::
J o::!:
I-'z
"". . c"'"' IJIII""~~""'"'''''''''' ...
~...= IC'~ C..: C;.,;: t.-c.".. ~. ; t:.;:: -=- C: : J t .0: t.._ ::: ...~ .. c:I :;, ~ ::.~ =-
4_~""_.~"",,,~
".".-^...,.~,~~;t~"""'_,..~. - ,.....""....~
!- w~ \ ;' \\
i z ~ ~ co 1..
! 00.. ::c ~
\ ~ 0 ~ x ~
:i' III ~ ~ z I '!l. t.Ll
~ = i w'" ~~~
""- - > .... ..~
I- fit W ..l '~1
00 0 0 ~" ""'" <0 ~ I II, '
<l: <l: <l: I- a: III ~ 1-.. \ ~~!. 1
'" '" 0 r- I- 9& ~ Z g ~i '"
.. :;; . !:. il ~ 0 -< ",.a .. \ rv j
. NN 0 ~ is u U ~ ~ t~:'l
y ~ _ _ :I: 8 (/) s ~ Z uJ ~~
:::: +> + 0 > uJiII'" ~ .
, '0 0 " '" ", w U '..' '
U U <l: 0 _ 1/1 'Vl w Wet. C 0 ~ 8. ~Sl \ '
~ ~". ffi ~. ., · · - -' ' _11
. . Ol' lL <D N 0 a. ~ .... I- III III en Q. €...
'2< " " ' .~~ ~ ~. ~". · · · .... H Z ii1 '" ~ n'
""+ + + .... + __ ~ ~~ lD 6 tl z ~ j ~ ct ~ ~~. ~ ' '
u . ~o 0 0 . '".' E--< <0 '" ~ ," · I ' I
~~ Z 13 % a: ~ .... 3 :5 ~... ~ W uJ I ft I
o 0 Q rJ) (/) (/) u::J l1. a:1Il ::: W > uJ .I. 0 ~ Tf) ct . IIA " ~
lUlU .... 1-1-1- <((/) ~ III a: 0 W ~F- \..l-l 0 I "oJ
'0 . ",," ~~.~ .~ . 0 0 ~.. ...,< 0. .... ..115\ ;', '
, 3> > 000. o'~" 8 ~ . · -l ~~ ...... 0 ; "
<l ~ @~ ~ ._e" w~.. '. Cl c ~ ~ ~ H ""'" '" I I h '
I- ~ .' . . 000 ~ ffiw~"~ z ~ . . ~.. '""" 0. 'I I.':
oCt . ~ ~ ~~ If. ~ ~~8'" ~~;t~ ~~ w W a. a.
C .0- z.<< ,. """ , .. o. ,. .' '
ua: z n.n. w ..., --- ~ ..., z<( o~..J)( r....
W <l:zo ~ lU (/)(/):;. ~ ~::l::l 0 ~::l<!l I- +..... \..../ (j ~
;t~<( ;t 0 zz ffi 9 mmm I- ~ - UJ W '
I- '"I;; " w w . 5 ~ ,-' G) () ','~ '. - - . ---j \ '
en g ~ z g ~ ~ ~ ~ III 11. g ~f - \
I
I
1 '
I ·
\
o -- ;
z --
- 5 j
U..J
_ S _ i
r""l.... '1 \ \
v...... z ·
Zf- - ~
1 ......iJ., I- ~
~ Q o:s ~ '>~.... .
V ..J::; ~ /..... .
z .....:l ..l" .,.--",ffi_ __ I ......
~ - t ::.:;: I !:> - -- ........
~ ::> z ~ '::. 1 ~~
\ ;; CO ;:) f \ ~i ~ ~ ~ !'
~ .:L) ~:;:j a ...: :
~ ;:)~::I ~ .. ~ '
I . '"" '
~~ ' .
, '
_________ ' c. .. ' ~ ;
Joo ""'It. .~ ,. I [ - uJ
1 "::J UtI _ CO ~
:::::::.-----:. qno'- \ O@J
I ,'\ ' i:' ~~ j
~r:: , S~
.'l ,:' ..:" CO~
; II \ ,. O~
~ . <.,r Z~'
31\ <0; 0 e
(/) ......l-
, . z
I , \ g: -;:)
\ '" :J.,.
, 'e. ~ CO
:0
\
_ ~d'.
--I .
g ~ '
.; 'Z f=
" " .. ~ "- '
I >. ~o. !
I \ ~;i Ul ~'" :i
-' ,t;; U '" UI '
. ~: u ~< ' .
~ % ." <t. ,0 'I
ow"; ",':5 >- z ~ \ .
~, . g',: U <; .
" . " .' " Z 0 z '\
., I 0 ... ...~ uJ :i1 <(
"'I a., r __' !i % 0 ",'" i
~ iI1j O::::l?" .
o Ow uJ ..J;.) ,
9<;g ... Zw ~ ;.) '" I
o . j!c' I ~ UI <( A
, . ' '" .> ..
f'.' 0' ' 1
._..,.,_."",ce,:. '" l' ~
, . 1
." ,~1
I' :L~ :1.' ;'"_ I '" t - - -- J
\'''''' ,.. '
':i : s' ·
.. ~ I
- - +- - - - jl __ I
_ _ '-,+-, ".c..C -"-rc.....c. ,.;,;. ~ - - I
- II ' g - - .
" ' t -' ._--" ". ._- -- '
I gl II ,\ [ ,
: U - J
I '
I .. --- 1
C~_______J ',.'.J,.../..::..... \1.
' .'~~1'..
I 0 .....:V.'~
.\ \ '~9 ", . . ~ - . {"." .'.':. '. .::
. " t.
'>., O9g. [ ~",' ~~. " : ." ".{
;\ ,\Y r ....' .~{..:A'."
I ..' f,' " $I'
. ' '
:, . "',. ':,...
" . ,I . . . >
, - /'
f -
. i 8
z -
__ __ c:
.
- ~ ~
<C uJ -~-
I. ~
~ ~i 'I I, ~
> u ~ / 0;:: I ~
........~ ~ ~ D /iO~ ~ ~e I
r./l 0 uJ > .o(!- -',> I
~ o::t o.ZUI::j
E- en ~UJ i:D:.Ii
~ ~~g~ ---
00. :b,... .'
Zu=:ti:c
./ -.J:J _iJJ<...._
........y/ C\ ~3 ~~ffi
.....--- --'"
"" co u..f-
Ul -
-):;I~: t,',I) ~~ 5"',,". F)(:~;~,. ..1l:1':'....1:H'.<-<Q\ J .
!
".-,..' '- ".... . ...... "..,."
.. _ _ .... _ 1::::;:. . _ " · · , · " ," .... ~. ,.....- c::::I ," ......... ·
...;;.. _ ___ ' ..._ _~ _ .... ._ _ _ ... _ _ ... _ t:..... ..~ ..-
\~.-
IlIII
I ...
..
17;. IlIIIIi
II
..
~
..
Il /o2/r~ JI/o€> J 9.r- ..
"
..
I
.. ..
..
"
ill
~
~
l1li
III
III
iIiI
III
,.
I -
,
".
-.....- "
II1II
^ 1')
..
"
III
a
a
"
..
"
t
j
" l