71-96 Ordinance
RECORD OF' ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No. m_nm__m_mm P assedm____m_ ____n_n _____nmnnm_m__m19 -- ____n
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR
~ 6.196 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN
TERMINUS OF NORN STREET, APPROXIMATEL Y 375 FEET
WEST OF WILCOX ROAD, FROM: R-1B, LIMITED SUBURBAN
__ RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP ZONING
DISTRICT) TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT (WILCOX ESTATES)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of
Dublin, state of Ohio, S of the elected members
concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see
attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of
Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District and shall be subject to regulations and
procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of
the Codified Ordinances) the city of Dublin zoning Code and
amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list
of contiguous and affected property owners, and the
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning commission, Exhibit
__ "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of
, this Ordinance and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance
therewith.
...........
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in
force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
this J (,-fh day of ~ ' 199~.
~
Presiding Officer
Attest:
~O~
Clerk of council
Sponsor: Planning Division
-
\ ~)l (tftt1y that copies of this Ordlnance/Rt:)61t1tielt'~~re po.sted in the
....... _ ~ ~tin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the 0'110 ReVised Code.
~CL.~
Cle.rk of Council. Dublin, Ohio
-t'-",''",', f tl,__'~ ".._'IlJl[_,_~~~_~~'''''~'-'''~'''''''''-O' - ,,-..,'~,'~,-,','"-,"_... ....,"~~_ j, ."l ,..1
1
e
.@}~
COLUlLBUS w.RYSVIILE RD
SHIER RINGS RD
I
.>-. ,
; I
D -SHERRl ~ /
AVE : /
I
()
-
),{pLE RD
...... ,<<OERNER k _ _ _ ......
............
~
OJ ~
.--
CORPO~ CE~R
UDR
- I
~
GHT LN N
,.... ~ fH ,..,
, ,
~ \ \ ~,,_; 1/ PUD FI \\1 I /(~ ""'.it >-
_H, "'0 \ - ~ ~-:-r ___..I -:h ~'_______ ~\ ? ~~ /R (\~ =-- --.~.. ~I
U I "'" r - .'~ ,~ ..- ~ ~,
PUO ,~ '7't -=1
_, '- _ ul--.l':" I , R-'JP"';;;: l-- ' . " ' R
J\ I ~.. R-~ !O' ~ ~ ~ '
._--....~. ,.. p~ \ ~r\ PIlP ~ -,
) pCD ' pcD'\ ~ PC D ~ \:. ;U~ -1l-' l T
... .. ,..., 7' Ll ~ \.L 1 1"
L1 ~~ IC>~R_2S
~,' . ~ ! \." cy'-}l~~~.."" lB
;- ,- ~I _ ).,;.:.......... J- . ,~ ex) ~ = ~c ,.w -j~ ~ ,~,
... LI ~ l--' RI ,,,\ / ' · ""l- F ~ 0
___)[ Ilpit. \:::= _ ~. ~l / /IP U 0 ':.::: ~~ r-... --..\~1I
^ nc _ -::L I ~L I (( n 12 '"
c.- , \lc..t lee, Rl.-1 p .', I R I ; P.I ~ ~ '"so /I
LI L..>,,~ ~ SO id Rl; , ,~' r~~ .....;..., PU 0, '"'I r:::I
R 1 R I '" ~ , I' --tpijo ..-l
~~ ; ~~
R ' ~ I
TIll It'- . ' ~ )/1 i=
f R =
I P L R ~~\.,.'t: ~ l-J (/, . - =
_ t:)y.a-J;. ~ R ,... R-1A =
-:~ ...0 \ I .". ~
... _ -'1 _ _ \1 {l R - 1/ . '7 · ~
l' \J ~ . \ ~ I \ :J. U
\ \=Rt Rib I, Co - \ ,
t" _ . _ ., , ~./'-\\ \ : I"".'..\' cS \ f\ ee \50 ~ --' -
~ ftlll) .. ~1 v~", pea\ ~~\.. _\/ I
__ Pip....... p~~ \"" ~ I ~. \ 1\
," ,_ _ ""7 .so,' \' puo r
\ '----- '\ ~ A ~ ':'1 ~ PLR \ -.. \ \ pCD \ ,d '\ - I-,\- ~
.,ri 18 .., - \ \11 k'- ~ " , \ "\ \ --- .. \ 0 \ --
_ 00 I LIJ _ R...1 600 , \ \', \
~ fiG.. - R,1 Z "" _~\\ '.\ J \ R-'
, . ~ ~. r---~ ~ r ~,o l. ,,,,,Cl "t"\--\.. \ '
...... ~ R-16 ~ -f'1 \' \ '
.----_ 111 \ \
./ :puo?:' \' \ i \\
, -'f \ \ \
., 'lOoG ~ -, '.' '~, --------------, QR..~-
\ ~ ___-J- -., ~, ~ )
o ,\ ' ,.....)
I ,..-- ~ ~ - ""-./---- \
- \ J~ ------- " - ~
- -t-/
~_ "'- __- - -- - ---- ~- "Il ---
. <- """,'-------
Ro<>1 a . :J \ r- ~-\ _r-<' ~, '
I-[~ \___/~. )Q== -
~ ,I =
~ \' =
/1. _/ -/\ .~ ~ "';;J
--' ___ \ \ _ r ~..
_ ~ \___--- C , ' I =
- - \ ~, =~
~ ----I ,,~o~d" ~
I -- \\ '
" - ---r- --- A' .z; ~
\, ~ \ \ 1 ~~4 Z96-006
_ \\ " "'. f(\ Ja?>",>9 Wilcox Estates
-....:.'~ ..' ~/ ~~
--...c. I _~ ""'"
,.... -:::::.::.~r ...-
~~,L , \ ~......=-1
~"
....<'--'-
" , '\
. . I 01 'I
It:,
"':~'".
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF TilE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No:
DISTRICT HAP ZM , 'Zq~ -()()(p
(Reclassification of Land) Date File :
".... AJVlENDED APPLICATION previously filed Fee Receipt No.
under PLR 2-94-018, amended to PUD Received by:
..... application April 5, 1996.
Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO TilE 1I0NORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Applicant Rockford Homes
party in contract to purchase
being the property located within the area proposed for
rezoning , requests that the following
described land to be placed in the PUD zoning district
.
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of
.....
,
a recorded plat, with an area of .
.......
b. neginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimension
of from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
.
c. The tract of land containing 6.196 Acres and bounded by:
Heather Glen See III (specify) on the d)S E W (Circle)
Balgriffin (specify) on the N ~E W (Circle)
Joseph Bee (specify) on the N S E ~Circle)
,.....
Woodin Family Trust (specify) on the N sfi'w (Circle)
l
I
..... d" Attached legal description: YES x
NO
-'-""
Li
Page I of 4 2 7
~_.-
.' , .
, . ' ,
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8% x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
,...... To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
t other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
...... fully dimensioned.
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
-
Revised list previously furnished
April 22, 1996, copy attached.
"....
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND
......
1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: 16 lot single family
residential development
.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and EX:;bits submitted
Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan wf . Sketch .
- - -'---,---'
Photographs - ; Other (specify)
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
..... and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
c see attached text for combined concept and preliminary development
\
\....
J plan,lrevision version of 4/12/96
Page 2 of 4
. . -;' .
3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
YES
NO x
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
-
....
C. AFFIDAVIT
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
I ( we) the attome for Rockford Homes
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included
in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
- and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments. in behalf of the application herewith submitted and.that the statements
and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
- best of my/our knowledge and belief.
37 W. Bridge street, Dublin OH 43017
(Mailing address)
614-766-0425
(Phone)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27 day of June , 19; 96.
,~~ ~~~~
(v ruCHARD L WAU\ER, AilDmey AIUlw . (no<ary ubi ~cr '1
.... .* .:- - > .. *j NOTARYPUBUC,STATEOFOHIO
Perso~ ~"" ~tacte~FEfflMe~I~' if other than above signatory:
....1 f ../
....1' IS: 01'" ....
....... ......................
(Name (Address) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not wrIte below thIs-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn Held to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
3. City Council: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
; . .
.
.
,
The applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and
Zoning Commission nnd/or Dublin City Coullcil does not constitute a guarantee
or binding commitment that the City of Dublin \-lill be able to provide essential
r-
services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said applicant.
.....
1be City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest
Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services
to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part
of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing,
" c~~ at
Date Signature of Applicant or authorized
representative thereof.
On behalf of:
.......
Rockford Homes
....... Applicant
r-
,
~
-
Page 4 of 4
---_._-----_._-~------'---"--'--'--
CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE
ATTORNEY AT LAW
37 WEST BRIDGE STREET
DUBLIN, OHIO 43017
614/766-0425
FAX 6141766.5797
- April 5, 1996
t Tom Rubey
''-- Planning Department
City of Dublin
5800 Shier Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
re: Z94-018; Rockford Homes/Wilcox Estates
Dear Tom:
As we discussed, please consider this letter and the accompanying documents as an
amendment of Z94-018 to become an application under the PUD regulations, Dublin Code
1181.07. This submission combines the Preliminary Development and Concept Plan steps
of the PUD, as pennitted in those regulations.
The amendment also alters the premises concerned to include the park area as an integral
part of the rezoning application. As requested by you, a new legal description has been
prepared which encompasses 6.196 acres. This legal description is attached and replaces
the previous one filed in this case.
Also included are a zoning exhibit graphically portraying the legal description and a site
plan labeled Preliminary Development and Concept Plan.
- The new text is also included. Since the requirements of the preliminary development plan
in the PUD and the development plan in the PLDR are virtually identical, the format is very
similar to the previous text. Some new information has been incorporated however, such
- as the revised total area and the resulting effect on density calculations.
I would also anticipate a revision to the historical notes document I previously prepared
which will incorporate new information. Since that document is informational rather than a
part of the application itself I will prepare it later, but in time for distribution for the May
meeting.
At this point I have not heard back from you as to the amount of the fee for amending this
application from PLDR to PUD. Please let me know so that I can get a check over to you.
~lY yours,
. sto~her T. Cline
crC:pq
Encl-15 ea of 4
..
- '96-06-21 09:19 CHRIS CLINE ATTY P.2
. . ,
r-::'-=---'~~'-'po~~~"':"'>~"'-~-~"
)I"F'~ 1:' fig ~ n \,7 r~
t~' I l~ ....:;'J !:'l. J,._ ~t_! l.:J" D-
,I n 'r~ . ...." ,
n 0~~ :, ~
ZONING DESCRIPTION , JJi'l 2 I 1996
6.196 ACRES
HEATHER GLEN
Situat~ in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being in Virginia Military
Survey Number 3004 and being a part of the 17.468 acre tract conveyed to Wilcox Road Associates
..... by deed of record in O.R. 11502003, records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and
being more particularly described as follows:
....
Beginning for reference at a point in the westerly right.of-way line of WIlcox Road at the
southeasterly comer of Lot Number 194 of "HEATIIER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASE 1," of record
in Plat Book 81, page 17 and being in the northerly line of the 1.428 acre tract conveyed to Ray
Edward and Leah Mae Higgins by deed of record in Deed Book 1985, page 498~
Thence S 840 05' 18" W, a distance of 357.20 feet, along the common line to said
"HEATHER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASE 1" and the 1.428 acre tract to a point at a common comer
to the said 1.428 and 17.468 acre tracts and being the point oftIUe beginning for the herein described
tract of land;
Thence S 03047' 22" E, a distance of 496.62 feet, along a common line to the said 1.428 and
17.468 acre tracts and the common line to the said 17.468 acre tract and the 3.354 acre tract
conveyed to The Woodin Family Trust by deed of record in OR 18969 A12, to a point at a common
comer to said 3.354 and 17.468 acre tracts;
Thence the following three (3) courses and distances across the said 17.468 acre tract~
1. Thence N 890 52' 48" W, a distance of 134.69 feet, to a point;
'---
2. Thence S 070 02' 05" W, a distance of215.00 feet, to a point;
..
3. Thence N 570 31' 20" W, a distance of383.35 feet, to a point in a common line to the
said 17.468 acre tract and the 5.278 acre tract conveyed to Avery Road Ltd. by deed
of record in O.R 265ISH19;
Thence N 05036' 42" W, a distance of 453.60 feet, along the conunon line to said 17.468 and
5.278 acre tracts and the common line to the said 17.468 acre tract and the 9.828 acre tract conveyed
to Joseph A. and Venus M. Bee by deed of record in Deed Book 3183, page 279 to a point at a
common comer to said 17.468 and 9.828 acre tractslsaid point also being in the southerly line of
"HEATHER GLENN, SECTION 3, PHASE 2" of record in Plat Book 81, page 19;
Thence N 840 05' 18" E, a distance of498.60 feet, along the common line to said 17.468 acre
tract and said "HEATHER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASES 2 AND 1" to the point of true beginning
containing 6.196 acr~, more or less.
R. D. ZANDE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LWPItsI2 \ 32W.O.OO 1
April 4. 1996
IJIIII"'II
~
.
Christopher T. Cline
J1Lttorney at .Law
37 West Bridge Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
614-766-0425
fax 614-766-5797
April 22, 1996
To: Libby Farley
City of Dublin Planning Dept
Libby,
As you requested follows the list of property owners that adjoin the 6+ acres of
land that Rockford Homes is attempting to rezone.
~
Property Owners adjacent to Rockford Homes rezoning tract
Brokers Investment Co. c/o Shamrock Inv. Co
65 E. Wilson Bridge Blvd. #200
C-I\'l'>" Worthington, Ohio 43085
David and Aimee Ulstad 6081 Pirthshire
Dublin, Ohio 43016
Peter Hadsall and Dorothy 5876 Nom Street
Finnnegan Dublin, Ohio 43016
William and Teresa Charlton 700 Hartford Street
Worthington, Ohio 43085
Borror Corporation 5501 Frantz Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Rockford Homes (applicant) 131 Dillmont 2 7
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Woodin Family Trust 5781 Wilcox Rd
Dublin, Ohio 43016
.-..""""..d","";,,,;_""_ ~". '.. '-"~",,"" ll''T ~'C':""~_""~"""""""'~~'""""~._N ,~-'.~~-""""",,,.-~~,-~"~ '~"""""-''''~~~;'''M~_~_~''~''''._''_
"
Roy and Leah Higgins 5867 Wilcox Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
Joseph and Venus Bee 5867 Avery Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
A very Road Ltd. c/o Mid States Development Co
5720 A very Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
-
Wilcox Road Associates c/o Borror Corporation
5501 Frantz Road
..... Dublin, Ohio 43017
~
","",,"':>iI
_ .__.._____'__'_'c~'~_____~~__
MEMORANDUM
...."".
TO: Dublin City Council
~'....:<iil
FROM: Lisa L. Fierce, Senior Planner
DATE: August 29, 1996
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 71-96 Wilcox Estates
The following conditions were previously imposed by the Planning Commission:
1) That the minimum lot frontage be widened to 63 feet; Completed
2) That the IS-foot no-build be expanded to the rear of Lots 1-6, 11-12, a no-build zone be
established on the north side of Lots 1 and 16 (side yard), and a IS-foot no-build zone be
established to the rear of Lots 9 and 10, to protect the existing trees, to the satisfaction of
staff, and that lot lines be redrawn if necessary; Completed
3) That the no-build zone be more fully defined to prohibit all structures, decks, fences,
satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing sets; Completed
4) That a plan be submitted to the satisfaction of staff to provide separation between public
property (park) and private property (single-family lots); To be completed with final
.... development plan
5) That the southern property line of Lot 6 be realigned to provide a minimum of 105 feet
- (for green space) measured from Woerner-Temple Extended; Completed
6) That a tree preservation plan be submitted outlining the limits of tree protection by snow
fencing; Completed
7) That fencing restrictions be provided within the text and a commitment be made to install
street trees and sidewalks (along all new interior streets) Completed; and
8) That all conditions be met, and a revised text and plan be submitted subject to staff
approval, prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing by City Council.
Completed
..
'-]' ,""'-~ .'~' ""---~-----
k
" RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legll Blink Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No..w....=.......... . Passed..w.,...,....w.......w.',.....,'"..........l9....,...
\
\ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR
6.196 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN
TERMINUS OF NORN STREET, APPROXIMATELY 375 FEET
.- WEST OF WILCOX ROAD, FROM: R-1B, LIMITED SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP ZONING
DISTRICT) TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT (WILCOX ESTATES)
-
I
\ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the council of the City of
, Dublin, state of Ohio, of the elected members
concurring:
section 1. That the following described real estate (see
attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the city of
Dublin, state of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District and shall be subject to regulations and
procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of
\1 the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin zoning Code and
I amendments thereto.
i'
(I section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list
:i of contiguous and affected property owners, and the
i! recommendations of the Planning and zoning commission, Exhibit
it "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of
\: this Ordinance and made an official part of this Ordinance and
ii said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance
II therewi th.
II section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in
i force from and after the earliest period allowed by law.
,I
II
II passed this day of , 199_.
~ Ii
II
jI
II
__ II Mayor - Presiding Officer
II
Ii Attest:
II
11
ii .
Ii Clerk of Councl.l
i[
i Sponsor: Planning Division
I
I
I
M SU8MmID'IOCOUNCIL
~FORMEE1INGClN ~/:J/q~
-
.
,
s
.@~
COLUYBUS w.RYSVIILE RD
SIllER RINGS RD
I
I I
. :... ,
; I
D -sHERR! ~ /
~ :/
I
Q
\!PLE RD
---........
......"
g
OJ' C) $
IE
CI)
. - - <=
Q:'
o
CORPORA: CE'(l'fER ' <=
UDR
,..-
Z96-006
\J)Cl Wilcox Estates
~WN ~
n
"~~
\ \ \. r II PUD t ...
'C:'t v Fl \\1 I
_ I D \., ~~- ~ J Ii :T I(~ . ,,-
I...-il, r:;=' -.J. L__ -' Po-I/' 7r== R ~ ---' ~
_. \"'_1 iX\.,-~' ~ R-1111.......~ PUD 11 - / ;:;>r.---:;::.~ ~
rL._~J.! .(~ "0 f::t'l--' i>-. 11''/ ~ R =
, ,-<'_ -rc.a. . ~. .- L
, peO . PCD \._~ PCD ~~~.o , ~ ':;' I
" ~ 1>"" 6~ \ T ,
L _ ""'"" - ~ 'L . LI \'l' 'li n
_- f0.! LI ~{~ l~~
_. ;'-..,-. .1 11r ~ R-2
LI'- '-.::;. 'Lu_........ " (' ,'~ ,.5C 8 ~ "1 B
~ Y ..1/' . r-..... -(I) /'--'- ..
___ '~'[ _.p t::: \ RI I .... .:"',f:,.. / ~ CC' CJ 1 1
r: \",'1 ~ · 1\ I..-r-, · ' '..... ~
" _ ...__ ,'I ILL PUD ";!~~
~.. . 'bL~ - '- '.
~..L..!..Jcc. Roo"'" .-. "~I RJ r 'Ii tr - - T I~ ~~
L I 1: .... I '-' DT" I P.I " ~ -
. ~". SO sd .'" . -" r-- ' ~ 80 , =""
, R 1'"'" ~ ". n'O""!. tl . n . file L 11 jL.......... I, P ~ D..., #.:;g;l '=\'i
~ R I ~....~ I V ,_..., .oc.--.... ~ j IT "=
R ....., . 60 II .'
. _ i ~~:-t:
I I \ f .
I P L R ~ ~~'':: --. L-J )1 --
_ . \ ..., Lo - ~ . =
- ~ _.. . - @I
0'-- _L · R ~
..: ~~_ ~ R-11' ~ R-1A
-rn R 1b h. \ \ ;J. ~
I - . . Do II
..- _' \ \ " ' li \
, PIP P\I 0 p'. 0 '".,<.'" ~ \1 \' o)d;n~~ o.~~ cc \SO~~ --'
~ '\.J\- ~ \ \ ... \ \ ,,\~r..lu-..;: , ·
'---- \ EU.""" 7 'SO \11\ ,.: r ~
.....::\i '8 '______,' /:.' ti~ p.-11:i pLR \ \ . \ \ \ ?CD ,\ I \ PUJ'r
, II \ ,,~. I' \~ '" \-- 11
M "l\ \ I \ ~ r'- \
U _II I R~1 Z ....-' V\ \h ',\ ~
.... - ... ' :..
_ .' ._'~ ,,_,z _J \\\\ \ . \ \'
> _____ _ 1'- \If--...... .... ~,I) ,."" I '. \ ~h \ R' I
. ;.uo ~ ~./-, 1 \ \ . \ ,'"n -,
\ ... oC.' ...-if"" ..-l \ \1"'"
\ __~_,L " \.' \ ...------- "R'.---------
\ ,. \ C "
.-I ~ \ ~ l,) l'
. -u '\ · ,_/~ ' ,~
~, 1------ I "- ~ - -' - -,-- -\. --'-' - -,---.
"' ~ \ -?- . - /
_~' RoP'\6 _ ~ \ ~ -~\ tR~"Ir-'------
.. l C--- \___-.... C", ,....-I
, ~ ~-
_1 - - - --- ,----\ \ ~~==
//- \ ~/~
, .~
. ' ,,' ~- ",
I " -,/'" C , ' \'~'
, =
, \-- = =
, ' /, ..... ~~ =
~~ r.
\___-'\ ~ '~\--- \ ~y - II Z96-006
_ \ \ i);, (" \ Wilcox Estates
..... ~ _ ~v / \;- V~=
_ r. -
. \ K- _Cd'~
_.'n___.".
. '1
.~~
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF TIlE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No:
DISTRICT MAP ZHZq~ -()()(p
(Reclassification of Land) Date File :
AMENDED APPLICATION previously filed Fee Receipt No.
under Pill Z-94-018, arrended to PUD Received by:
application April 5, 1996. ,..
Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ....
The Applicant Rockford Hares
~purchase
being the property located within the area proposed for
rezoning , requests that the following
described land to be placed in the PUD zoning district
.
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of
,
a recorded plat, with an area of .
b. neginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimension IIIIilI
of from the (specify) of
lIIIIII
(street or other), and having an area of
.
c. The tract of land containing 6.196 Acres and bounded by:
Heather Glen See III (specify) on the eS E W (Circle)
Balgriffin (specify) on the Nc.!)E W (Circle)
Joseph Bee (specify) on the N S E ~Circle)
\AkxJdin Family Trust (specify) on the N S~ (Circle)
d. Attached legal description: YES X NO
,-, <
Page 1 of 4 ~-:' 7
....
,
.
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8\ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
fully dimensioned.
r.,"'"
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
Revised list previously furnished
April 22, 1996, copy attached.
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF TIlE DESCRIBED LAND
1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: 16 lot single family
residential develqxrent
.
_>0l!t, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
"",,,
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and EX:;bits submitted
Plot Plan _____; Building Plan _____; Development Plan ~; Sketch _____;
Photographs ----- ; Other (specify)
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
see attached text for carbined concept and preliminary develqxrent '
plan,- revision version of 4/12/96
Page 2 of 4
....
.
3. lias an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
YES
NO x
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
....
C. AFFIDAVIT
-
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF 01110
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
I (we) the attorne for Rockford Hanes
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of being
duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we are the owner(s)/lessee(s) of land included
in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments, in behalf of the application herewith submitted and.that the statements
and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief.
....
37 W. Bridge Street, Dublin OH 43017
(Mailing address) ....
614-766-0425
(Phone)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27 day of June , 19; 96.
/Oi.p:~A-C~~\ -/iiZf/ ..c:~/i,)
i;B-\ AiCHAIIJ L WAU<ER.....,""" (no'.ry nblic)-
* ',' ~ , .' NOTARYPUBUC,STATEOFOHIO
Perst.~ ,,;,,, -'~tacte~FElimeC0~'illSM~Il' if other than above signatory:
',.., , '/
.....~!!;:.9.f...../
(Name (Address) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <Do not wrIte below thIs-lIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn lIeld to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
3. City Counc 11: Date of lIearing .....
Approved Oisaporovf>rl Mnrli fin...-.
.
TIle applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and
Zoning Commission !lnd/or Duhlin City Counc:il does not constitute a guarantee
or hinding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential
servtces such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said applicant.
"..... 'n,e City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest
~
Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these service!'!
to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part
of said faciliti.es available to the applicant until some future date.
TIle undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
c.~~ ~ (}j",ip,. (]J...
Date Signature of Applicant or authorized
representative thereof.
On behalf of:
Rockford Hares
Applicant
""'""'''1
~
Page 4 of 4
......
Christopher T. Cline
~ttomey at Law
37 West Bridge Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
614-766-0425
fax 614-766-5797 ....
--"
April 22, 1996
To: Libby Farley
City of Dublin Planning Dept
Libby,
As you requested follows the list of property owners that adjoin the 6+ acres of
land that Rockford Homes is attempting to rezone.
~
Property Owners adjacent to Rockford Homes rezoning tract
Brokers Investment Co. c/o Shamrock Inv. Co
65 E. Wilson Bridge Blvd. #200 .,
Worthington, Ohio 43085
Ji
David and Aimee Ulstad 6081 Pirthshire ...J
Dublin, Ohio 43016
Peter Hadsall and Dorothy 5876 Nom Street
Finnnegan Dublin, Ohio 43016
William and Teresa Charlton 700 Hartford Street
Worthington, Ohio 43085
Borror Corporation 5501 Frantz Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Rockford Homes (applicant) 131 Dillmont ' 7
Columbus, Ohio 43235
Woodin Family Trust 5781 Wilcox Rd
Dublin, Ohio 43016
-
-------,-',...-
Roy and Leah Higgins 5867 Wilcox Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
Joseph and Venus Bee 5867 Avery Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
A very Road Ltd. c/o Mid States Development Co
5720 A very Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016
"..~" Wilcox Road Associates c/o Borror Corporation
5501 Frantz Road
." Dublin, Ohio 43017
f!itlI'!'H~
....'e';'..
.....
.'-,..._~..-'
',j~...~_ n
ZONING DESCRIPTION t,lli....- - h
6.196 ACRES :._:\ l-l)U -
HEATHER GLEN 'Of -~-;; r~;'~-:;~';'-~-" "-~:-.~ ".:'
o- J ! ~,. i"; "
; : ,~ ~ __ i '
Situate in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being in Virginia Military
Suzvey Number 3004 and being a part of the 17.468 acre tract conveyed to Wilcox Road Associates
by deed of record in O.R. 11502D03, records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and ...
being more particularly described as follows:
1IIIIIIf'
Beginning for reference at a point in the westerly right-of-way line of Wilcox Road at the
southeasterly corner of Lot Number 194 of "HEATHER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASE 1," of record
in Plat Book 81, page 17 and being in the northerly line of the 1.428 acre tract conveyed to Ray
Edward and Leah Mae Higgins by deed of record in Deed Book 1985, page 498~
Thence S 840 05' 18" W, a distance of 357.20 feet, along the common line to said
"HEATHER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASE I" and the 1.428 acre tract to a point at a common corner
to the said 1.428 and 17.468 acre tracts and being the point of true beginning for the herein described
tract of land;
Thence S 03047' 22" E, a distance of 496.62 feet, along a common line to the said 1.428 and
17.468 acre tracts and the common line to the said 17.468 acre tract and the 3.3 54 acre tract
conveyed to The Woodin Family Trust by deed of record in O.R. 18969 A12, to a point at a common
corner to said 3.354 and 17.468 acre tracts~
Thence the following three (3) courses and distances across the said 17.468 acre tract;
1. Thence N 890 52' 48" W, a distance of 134.69 feet, to a point~ ..
2_ Thence S 070 02' 05" W, a distance of215.00 feet, to a point;
....
3. Thence N 570 31' 20" W, a distance of383.35 feet, to a point in a common line to the
said 17.468 acre tract and the 5.278 acre tract conveyed to Avery Road Ltd. by deed
of record in O.R. 26515 H 19;
Thence N 05036' 42" W, a distance of 453.60 feet, along the common line to said 17.468 and
5.278 acre tracts and the common line to the said 17.468 acre tract and the 9.828 acre tract conveyed
to Joseph A and Venus M. Bee by deed of record in Deed Book 3183, page 279 to a point at a
common comer'to said 17.468 and 9.828 acre tracts~ said point also being in the southerly line of
"HEATHER GLENN, SECTION 3, PHASE 2" of record in Plat Book 81, page 19;
Thence N 840 05' 18" E, a distance of 498.60 feet, along the common line to said 17.468 acre
tract and said "HEATHER GLEN SECTION 3, PHASES 2 AND I" to the point of true beginning
containing 6.196 acres, more or less.
R. D. ZANDE & ASSOCIATES, INC. "1l\1vt6
LWP/ts/2132W-D.OOl
April 4, 1996 IV"
....
.",--,'"_....~._~ ...'..'.. '-. -'-.'
Rockford Homes
Northern approx 6.196 acres of Woodin Tract
Preliminary Development Plan Text w/concept plan included
Category: 1181.07 (PUD)
Rezoning Case # Z94 018, Z96-006
November 29, 1994
revised March 27, 1996
revised and amended to PUD 4/5/96
revised 4/12/96
.'. revised 8/8/96
A. North Point and Scale
The north point and scale are shown on the attached site plan, dated August 7, 1997 ,
and made a part of this Preliminary Development Plan. Also attached is a location map that
shows the site in relation to immediately surrounding development. A third map shows the "
exact legal description of the site proposed for rezoning.
'.
B. Proposed location and size of residential units
The subject property will contain only single family lots as the category of use.
There will be 16 lots, with a minimum frontage of 63'. Lot depth will be approximately
120 feet for the lots on the west side of Nom Street The lots on the east side of Nom
Street will have larger depths that vary, as shown on the site plan. The lot frontage is
similar to the Heather Glen Section ill subdivision to the north. The arrangement of the
lots is shown on the attached site plan, which is part of this Preliminary Development Plan.
The gross density is about 2.58 units per acre, significantly less than the adjoining Heather
Glen neighborhood.
Residential units will have development standards and deed restrictions similar to
the Heather Glen neighborhood.
C. Proposed size, location and use of non residential portions of the site.
.,..'"
(1). Parkland considerations. The non residential portions of the site are park areas
(1.01 acres) on the south side of the site. Two factors greatly influence the selection and
~",i location of the park area. The first factor is the location of a historical site, possibly
containing a grave, as shown on the attached site plan. The second factor is the possibility
that the balance of the Wilcox Associates lands (about 12 acres) on either side of the new
Woerner Temple extension, and to the south of the premises covered by this application,
may be acquired by the City. The acquisition of this land is likely since the location of the
new Woerner Temple ROW, when combined with the limited access the City desires for
the roadway, has probably made it impossible to develop the land. Negotiations for
acquisition of this parkland are underway with the owner of the land. If in fact the City
acquires this land, its use as additional parkland could be possible, as development options
are limited.
Additionally, the City will be receiving parkland from the Balgriffm rezoning, just
to the west of Lot # 6. It is appropriate to connect this parkland with the parkland being
dedicated on the east side of Nom Street, where the historical site is. This allows a 60'
deep green belt along the north side of the new Woerner Temple extension.
-,.....,..,,~_...........-' '-'
.. [~ @ ~ II I"~; -~
, ; n \ ,=--' )_..__.,__.;....._.....L,~.~_..r_.
Rockford Homes/W oodin Tract
:694 918, Z96-006 ,i-', _ (
i.\I !i'~ '
Page 1
818196 3:01 PM ,.._.._.. _.~r.....'-"....,...,.. ~",',,,'"
, . ".... ,-....
!iII'III
This applicant has the ability to acquire from Wilcox Road Associates land to be
used to satisfy its parkland requirement within the area north of the planned Woerner
Temple Road and east of Nom Street and this land is now included in this application. This
will reduce the amount of land the City acquires directly from Wilcox Road Associates as
part of the Woerner Temple Road acquisition (more fully discussed in ensuing sections of
this plan). This proposed parkland area, which includes a possible grave and historical
site, is included on the site plan. It is anticipated this parkland will be titled to the City of
Dublin.
(2) The Grave/historical site. On the site is a gravestone for a young woman who ...
died in 1870. The research regarding this gravestone has been extensively researched, see
the attached Historical Notes Regarding Gravestone On Old Wilcox Farm Site, revised
version of April 12,1996. In the final analysis, there is no firm reason to believe that ...
there are graves at this particular site. It has been detennined that the gravestone has been
moved and its mounting base has not been found. If the grave was someplace on the
original farm. that area would include land all the way to A very Road and for a distance to
the west, to the point where Woerner Temple Road takes its first jog to the north.
It has been detennined through personal interviews and examination of aerial
photos from 1936 and 1958 that this specific area was the site of a large barn and barnyard.
The barn appears to have been built around the turn of the century. As such, the historical
significance of the site is probably not great The habitation area was farther to the east; the
old log cabin is still largely in existence on an adjoining parcel of land. The site could have
been a gravesite only if the family of the deceased built a barn over the deceased' grave less
than 30 years after her death. The land stayed in the same family until 1957. Although
anything is possible, applicant has concluded that scenario is unlikely.
However, applicant commits to examination of the site by persons with
archeological expertise acceptable to the city staff. If it is detennined that graves are
actually in the designated area (shown on the site plan) applicant will subtract the area of the
graves from the land to be dedicated as the park requirement. Should graves be present, or
should the City desire that the gravestone be remounted as a symbolic gesture, applicant
will delineate the appropriate area with a fence, or, in a another manner acceptable to staff.
D. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage
, Sanitary sewer and water lines are both accessible from the Heather Glen Section .....
ITI subdivision to the north. The lines are presently planned and approved and will be
stubbed in to this site. Details are on the attached site plan, dated August 7, 1996. .....
A 60" storm sewer pipe runs along the northern boundary of the site, and drains
into the Heather Glen retention area Applicant intends to utilize this pipe and the Heather
Glen facility to handle retention as it appears that capacity exists there. It had been
previously planned that retention would be handled in the rear of the two deep lots (11 and
12) located in the northeast comer of the site and this most recent site plan, dated August 7,
1996, deletes that retention basin and instead shows a direct connection to the 60" pipe.
As required by Dublin Code, all utility services will be underground.
E. Proposed traffic circulation patterns
The previously planned Nom Street will traverse the site from North to the South
and is shown on the site plan. Both the north and south connection points were previously
detennined by zoning actions on adjoining parcels. This street will connect to Lothian
Street in the subdivision to the north and will also connect to the planned Rings
Rockford Homes/Woodin Tract
291 018, Z96-006
Page 2
818/96 3:01 PM
..
- ,-~-"~.._----
RoadIWoerner Temple extension to the south. Once made, this connection will provide
access to neighboring residential areas.
The short street stubbed off of Lothian Street as shown in the site plan provides
future access to a five acre parcel to the east. This stub will allow development of either a
cul-de-sac or a direct connection to Wilcox Road, should this parcel be redeveloped. It is
presently developed with a single home.
F. Proposed schedule of site development
p"-'", Due to the small size of this subdivision, it will be developed in a single phase.
Construction will begin as soon as zoning and platting have been concluded.
G. Relationship of the site to existing and planned land use
The largest factor affecting development of this site is the planned extension of
Woerner Temple Road. This new roadway has a 100' ROWand will have limited curb
cuts as its function is to serve as an minor arterial. The alignment of this new roadway,
selected by the City, effectively isolates the land covered by this application from the
balance of the parent tract owned by Wilcox Road Associates. In fact, the balance of the
tract is rendered undevelopable, both due to the path of the roadway and the access and
setback requirements to be applied to the new road. Applicant has been advised that the
City is exploring the possibility of acquiring not only the ROW but also the balance of the
lands owned by Wilcox Road Associates. There further exists the possibility that this land
will be held as parkland due to the limited development potential of the land.
There also exists the possibility that further adjoining lands will be acquired by the
City as the ROW for the new Woerner Temple Road is pursued.
The subject site will be positively affected by the park land acquisitions as it will be
bordered on both the south and west sides by parkland.
The site is located in Subarea 6 of the Dublin Southwest Area Plan. This subarea
contemplates single family land uses similar to the Heather Glen neighborhood. This
proposal is in fact very similar to the lot size and layout of the Heather Glen neighborhood,
though the density is slightly lower. The density is significantly lower than that allowed by
the southwest area plan, which allows a maximum overall density of 4.3 units per acre.
~!""~ The applicant has constructed a large number of homes in the Heather Glen
subdivision and its homes in this proposal will in fact be from its same product line.
Overall, this proposal will serve as an extension of the Heather Glen neighborhood,
~i"i,j and will appear, from the street, to be integral to that subdivision.
In terms of relation to community facilities, services and public improvements, this
site is an integral part of the City of Dublin and is well served by all City services. Fire
protection is provided by the Washington Township Fire Department with Station 91 only a
short distance to the north on Shier Rings Road.
H. Control of site
Applicant is in contract to purchase the lands set out in this application and has the
appropriate control over ultimate zoning and development.
/. Additional points not addressed in text above and listed as factors under
Dublin Code 1181.07 (h)(1) through (17)
a. Height Building height to be same as R-1 of Dublin Code.
Rockford Homes/W oodin Tract
Z94 918, Z96-006
Page 3
818196 3:01 PM
...
b. Sidewalks Sidewalks to be installed on both sides of the new streets per Dublin
Code. This does not include the new Woerner Temple extension.'
c. Side yards Side yards shall be 12' with a minimum of 6' per side.
d. Setbacks Front setback from ROW shall be 25'. Rear yard setback shall be
20% of the lot depth with a 50' maximum.
e. Off street parking Off street parking and loading to be Dublin Code.
f NBZs along parkland All lots which adjoin municipal parkland at the rear will
have a 15' no build zone (NBZ) from the rear lot line. These NBZs are along the west and
south boundary lines of the site. Within this NBZ only landscaping may be installed, and ...
all structures are prohibited, to include decks, fences, satellite dish antennae, swimming
pools and swing sets. Applicant will install a defining physical delineation, such as a
landacape planting, between the park area and the lots within this NBZ as agreed to with -..."
,the Dubliil'Parks Director. The terms of this agreement must be determined by time of the
fmal development plan and included on the final development plan.
g. Street trees Street trees will be installed by the developer in accord with the
requirements of Dublin Code along all new streets. This does not include the new Woerner
' Temple extension. The species will be the same as Heather Glen Section III to the north.
h. Tree preservation plan The site plan attached hereto shows the results of a tree
sUlVey done by the applicant In order to protect the trees along the boundary lines NBZs
are indicated along the north and east boundary lines of the site. These NBZ's will be
marked off by snow fencing or other suitable fencing during construction. During the
development of the site, and during construction of the homes, no excavation within these
NBZ's may be done below the surface. Mter construction no excavation or other
subsurface work may be done within the NBZ unless specifically permitted by City
officials, if such officials determine in their discretion that no hann to the protected trees is
likely.
i. Fencing No fencing except split rail fences are pennitted. Such fences may not
exceed four feet in height nor be placed any closer to the front lot line than the front of the
house. Woven wire mesh of a subdued color may line such fences.
j. NBZs on final development plan/plat. The activities prohibited in the NBZs shall
be clearly described on the face of the final development planJplat.
J. Additional Items From Concept Plan Section 1181.07 (g)
~
The above preliminary development plan text provides significantly more detail than
the concept plan requirements. The following specific items are addressed: ...
A. Topography is shown on the attached site plan. The site is basically flat with
only slight relief.
B. There are no existing roads, buildings or permanent facilities on the site,
though, as noted above, the street system on adjoining parcels has been previously planned
in detail. The streets on this site will integrate with this existing plan.
C. All of the land in the application is in the City of Dublin so there are no
jurisdictional boundaries to be discussed.
D. There are presently no easements or rights of way on the premises. The
abutting property boundaries are shown on the site plan.
E. There are no physical features or natural conditions, other than trees along the
boundary lines as shown on the site plan. The only other element of interest is the possible
grave and adjoining foundation area from old buildings.
F. Surface drainage is generally to the east There are no channels or ditches on
the land, though ditches on the north, east and west are along property boundaries.
Rockford Homes/W <>Odin Tract
Z9~ 018, Z96-006
Page 4
8/8/96 3:01 PM
-
, _^_"""_~_-"""""""''''''_M~.._..,___""._~' .
G. There are no existing utility systems on the site. New utility selVices for water
and sanitary sewer will be located in the ROW, as shown on the site plan.
H. The site has the same access to regional transportation facilities as the rest of the
City of Dublin. ~g~,
.."",." Attorney for Applicant
Rockford Homes
37 W. Bridge Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
614-766-0425
-
-
Rockford Homes/W oodin Tract
Z94 918, Z96-006
Page 5
8/8/96 3:01 PM
....
~~,~---,---.-,-
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
ern OJ- ut Bu\ July 11, 1996
5800 Shier Rings Rood ...
Dublin, OH 43016-7295
Phone/rDD: 614/161-6550 J
Fox: 614/161.6506 -
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
7. Rezoning Application Z96-006 - Preliminary Development Plan - Wilcox Estates
Location: 6.196 acres located at the southern terminus ~f Nom Street, approximately 375
feet west of Wilcox Road.
Existing Zoning: R-1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township
Zoning District).
Request: PUD, Planned Unit Development District.
Proposed Use: A new neighborhood of 16 single-family lots and 1.0 acre of parkland.
Applicant: Donald Wick, Rockford Homes, c/o Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street,
Dublin, Ohio 43017.
MOTION:
To approve this application because the use and density are consistent with existing development
patterns; it conforms to the requirements of the PUD District, enlarges an existing park, and
complies with the Southwest Area Plan, with eight conditions:
....
1) That the minimum lot frontage be widened to 63 feet;
2) That the 15-foot no-build be expanded to the rear of Lots 1-6, 11-12, a no-build .....
zone be established on the north side of Lots 1 and 16 (side yard), and a 15-foot
no-build zone be established to the rear of Lots 9 and 10, to protect the existing
trees, to the satisfaction of staff, and that lot lines be redrawn if necessary;
3) That the no-build zone be more fully defined to prohibit all structures, decks,
fences, satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing sets;
4) That a plan be submitted to the satisfaction of staff to provide separation between
public property (park) and private property (single-family lots);
5) That the southern property line of Lot 6 be realigned to provide a mini~um of 105
feet (for green space) measured from Woerner-Temple Extended;
6) That a tree preservation plan be submitted outlining the limits of tree protection by
snow fencing;
7) That fencing restrictions be provided within the text and a commitment be made
to install street trees and sidewalks (along all new interior streets); and
Page 1 of 2
..
_' ~"_H'"_""_J,~~""'_""~ 1'-IY
-,~~-
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
July 11, 1996
..~<~
7. Rezoning Application Z96-006 - Preliminary Development Plan - Wilcox Fstates
(Continued)
8) That all conditions be met, and a revised text and plan be submitted subject to staff
approval, prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing by City Council.
* Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 7-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with
a positive recommendation.
NOTE TO THE APPLICANT:
Issues for inclusion at final development plan -
. The development standards should be listed on the final development plan and final plat.
. The fence detail should be shown on the final development plan and final plat.
. Entry features, lighting, and street tree plan should be submitted with the final
development plan.
~.,~
f
l
~'-"""
CfJ
Page 2 of 2
*.';.,..,
.'--~..."..
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - July 11, 1996
Page 30
CASE 7: Rezoning Application Z96-006 - Preliminary Development Plan - Wilcox Estates
APPLICANT: Wilcox Road Associates and Donald Wick, Rockford Homes Inc., c/o
Christopher T. Cline, Attorney, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017.
REQUEST: To rezone a 6.1-acre site located at the southern terminus of Nom Street,
approximately 375 feet west of Wilcox Road, from R-IB, Limited Suburban
Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District under the ..
provisions of Section 153.056. The plan includes a subdivision of 16 single-
family lots with one acre of parkland. -
STAFF CONTACT: Lisa L. Fierce, Planner.
BACKGROUND:
This property is zoned R-IB, a Washington Township classification, which has been the zoning
in place prior to this property's annexation to the Dublin in 1987. The Dublin Code continues
the township zoning until the property is rezoned to a Dublin classification. The 6. I-acre site is
part of a larger 15-acre parcel currently owned by Wilcox Road Associates. The R-IB zoning
district permits single-family houses on lots of at least 30,000 square feet, schools, parks and
places of worship. The Southwest Area Plan designates this site as appropriate for residential
development at a maximum overall density of 4.3 dwelling units per acre.
A concept plan for this site was approved by the Planning Commission on May 16, 1996 and by
City Council on June 17, 1996. The concept plan is non-binding, but it is intended to provide
feedback and guidance to the applicant on the general land use and density of the proposal.
Further, it authorizes the applicant to proceed with fIling the preliminary development plan. The
Commission expressed concerns about lot size and shape during the concept plan stage.
The preliminary development plan (rezoning) is the second stage of the three-tier PUD approval .,
process. The preliminary development plan establishes the permitted uses, development
standards, density, general layout, park areas and acreages, plus utilities, and serves as the
preliminary plat. It is binding on both the applicant and municipality. The Commission has not -
less than 30 days within which to make its recommendation. Following a recommendation by
the Commission, the plan is forwarded to City Council for final determination. A final
development plan will be fIled within 240 days following adoption of the PUD rezoning. No
construction is permitted until the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved the final
development plan.
CONSIDERATIONS:
. The site is directly south of Heather Glen Section 3 (zoned PLR District), apprqximately
375 feet west of Wilcox Road. This proposal includes a southern extension of Nom Street
to the (future) Woerner-Temple Road. Directly east of the site are two large, rural-type
residential lots with older single-family homes fronting on Wilcox Road (Woodin and
Higgins) . South of the site is undeveloped farm land, also owned by Wilcox Road
Associates, which includes the balance of the 15-acre parcel. These properties to the east
and south are zoned R-IB. Abutting the site on the southwest is the Balgriffin POD. This
l1li\
.,.' '. '.____'"'"'~~",c,'~_"_~.,~,~,~,,'~.....
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - July 11, 1996
Page 31
PUD, located at the northeast comer of Rings Road and A very Road, is a mixture of
single-family, multi-family, park, and limited commercial uses. A residential tract with
two dwelling units is also located west of the site (10-acre Bee property fronting on Avery
Road), also zoned R-IB District.
. The plan identifies an existing tree row and fence line along the north and west property
lines. A tree survey is needed to identify the trees for preservation. The results of the
. "n"lil survey may significantly impact the layout of the plan. Along the south border of the site
is 0.15 acres of untilled farmland that contains the foundation of a farmhouse, a
gravestone, and the remnants of a well.
...."'''!Ill . The Woerner-Temple extension (loo-feet of right-of-way) abuts the southern edge of the
site. Nom Street will be the north/south collector street extending from Balgriffm,
through this site, to Heather Glen. A new east/west street is proposed through this site
from Nom Street to the Woodin tract (located east of the site). The exact location of any
grave site on the site is critical to determining the proper alignment of Nom Street and its
intersection with the proposed Woerner-Temple extension.
. This proposal includes 16 single-family lots with an average lot frontage of 72 feet. The
minimum lot frontage is 61 feet, and minimum lot depth of 123 feet. Two lots (# 11 and
12) are 274 feet deep and include a proposed detention area within the rear yard. The
development standards proposed include a six-foot minimum and 12-foot combined side
yard, 25-foot front setback, and rear yard of 20 percent of the lot depth. These standards
are consistent with the Heather Glen subdivision. The lot frontage, however, should be
at a minimum 63 feet in width to be consistent with other subdivisions.
. The overall density of the proposal is 2.6 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with
surrounding densities and existing development patterns (e.g. Heather Glen - 3.1 dulac,
Trinity Park - 2.57 dulac, and Brighton Park - 3.04 dulac).
. The City is negotiating to purchase the residual nine acres of the 15-acre tract for park
purposes. The acreage would be added to a linear greenbelt that is being established along
",",""';>li the proposed Woerner-Temple extension alignment.
. The park dedication requirement for the proposal is 1.0 acre. The proposal includes the
dedication of two separate areas: a 0.88-acre parcel at the northeast comer of future
.,..41 Woerner-Temple extension and Nom Street, and 0.12-acre site on the northwest comer
of the same streets. That portion abuts future park land to be dedicated as part of the
Balgriffm subdivision. Lot # 6 abuts the O.12-acre park area on its south property line.
To provide additional access and visibility to the small park entrance, the southern
property line of Lot # 6 should be realigned with the southern property line of Lot #7 (east
side of Nom Street extended), at a minimum of 110 feet from Woerner-Temple Road
right-of-way.
. The 1.0 acre dedication includes the grave site. The application states that the grave site
area will be subtracted from the requirement, unless it is determined that no grave exists.
The applicant has stated that the location of the grave site will be determined at the ftnal
development plan stage. Staff believes the location of the historic grave within a public
park is appropriate, and no alteration will be necessary. Old grave sites are generally
maintained by the Township prior to annexation, by the property owner, or some
-
" -_.. -~--~'---"--"'''~''
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - July 11, 1996
Page 32
surviving family member. The City is not required to maintain them, however, Dublin's
policy is to maintain such sites when the responsible parties fail to do so.
. N om Street will be extended 450 feet southward from its current terminus in Heather
Glen. A local residential street will extend to the east property line. The streets have a
6O-foot right-of-way on the plan.
. A bike path on the south side of future Woerner-Temple extension is proposed within the
Southwest Area Plan. An eight-foot path should be installed by the developer within the ..,
proposed park frontage of this site. The bike path should be installed with the construction ~
*
of the streets. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the two public streets. ';tl\
. The plan shows a 15-foot no-build zone along the rear of Lot # 6 and part of Lot # 5, on ...
the west side of Nom Street extension. The no-build zone needs to be expanded to
preserve the tree line/fence row and continue across the rear of Lots # 1-5 (on the west
side of Nom Street extension). The plan shows a 15-foot no-build zone along the rear of
Lots # 7 and 8 (south side of the future east/west stub street), which may need to be
expanded. The no-build zone should continue across the rear of Lots # 9 and 10 for
consistency. A no-build zone should be established along the north side of Lots # 1, 11,
12, and 16 to preserve the tree row in that location.
. Overall, the definition of a no-build zone needs to be clarified within the text to preclude
the use of all structures, decks, fences, satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing
sets. Most importantly, however, a tree survey identifying caliper, species, and condition
of existing trees should be provided to determine appropriate no-build zone dimensions.
This will have direct impact on the fmal design of the subdivision and the dimensions of
the lots. A plan outlining limits of tree preservation through snow fencing should also be
provided. Some provision should be made to provide separation between the public space
(park) and private property (single-family lots).
. No provisions for fencing or street trees have been submitted. These are required and
should be included in the zoning text and the final development plan. ..
. Sanitary Sewer service to this development will come from the north through Heather Glen
Section 3. The Woerner-Temple extension will serve as the boundary between the sanitary
sewer tributaries. The water supply for this site will also be extended from Heather Glen ....
Section 3. However, provisions must be made for future extensions of water to the
adjacent undeveloped parcels, as approved by the City Engineer.
. The developer has expressed a desire to utilize the Heather Glen detention basin for storm
water management for this development. Engineering analysis has not been submitted at
this time. Combining storm water management with Heather Glen may be acceptable, but
should the developer not be able to demonstrate the capacity to do so, on-site storm water
management will be required. The plan shows a potential basin on the north side of Lots
# 11 and 12. Staff is concerned about how grading of the basin will affect the .tree line.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In general, the proposal is consistent with other surrounding subdivisions in terms of density,
development standards, and layout. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary development
plan subject to the following conditions:
IIIIIllI
.. '.",,-,~'-,^,,- r-W'lt' ", '~' 1 ...----~-~'~--.....-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report - July 11, 1996
Page 33
Conditions:
1) That the minimum lot frontage be widened to 63 feet;
2) That the 15-foot no-build zone be expanded to the rear of Lots # 1-6, 11-12, a no-
build zone be established on the north side of Lots # 1 and 16 (side yard), and a
15-foot no-build zone be established to the rear of Lots # 9 and 10, to protect the
existing trees, to the satisfaction of staff and that lot lines be redrawn if necessary;
w,.", 3) That the no-build zone be more fully defIned to prohibit all structures, decks,
fences, satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing sets;
4) That a plan be submitted to the satisfaction of staff to provide separation between
- public property (park) and private property (single-family lots);
5) That the southern property line of Lot # 6 be realigned perpendicular to the Nom
Street extension;
6) That a 20-foot access easement be provided to the storm water detention basin
between Lots # 11 and 12 or # 12 and 13, and that grading be done for the same;
7) That the storm water detention pond be maintained by the home owners'
association;
8) That a tree preservation plan be submitted outlining the limits of tree protection
by snow fencing;
9) That fencing restrictions be provided within the text and a commitment be made
to install street trees, sidewalks, and bike paths (between Lots # 3 and 4 and along
Woerner-Temple extended); and
10) That all conditions be met, and a revised text and plan be submitted subject to
staff approval, prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing by City
Council.
Bases:
- 1) The residential use and density proposed are consistent with existing development
patterns .
2) The proposal conforms to the requirements of the PUD District.
- 3) The plan enlarges the future Balgriffm park on the north side of Woerner ITem pie
Road.
4) The plan complies with the Southwest Area Plan.
Issues for consideration at Final Development Plan:
. The development standards should be listed on the fInal development plan and fInal plat.
. The fence detail should be shown on the fInal development plan and fInal plat.
. Entry features, lighting, and street tree plan should be submitted with the fInal
development plan.
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
.. Minutes - February 9, 1995
Page 19
Mr. Ferrara made the motion to table this rezoning application and Mr. Fishman seconded the
motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher,
yes; Mr. Zawaly, no; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Appro"/ed 4-1.)
S. Preliminary Plat - Cam~ Lakes (formerly known as Summitcrest Lakes)
-
Bobbie Clarke presented this reliminary plat for 66 single-family lots with .24 acres of public
park, and 12.99 acres of rivate ope~lspace. The site is 63 acres loea on the north side of
Summitview Road. P of the project is in Liberty Township in D ware County, but it will ...
be developed in au' ed manner. The site contaills a borrow pi. It will be regraded around
the edges, deepen in the center and flooded to become a 1 around which the houses will
be situated aro , a it. This site is adjacent to the Wedgew Hills subdivision. In 1993, the
rezoning pI owed one 26-acre lake that crossed into aware County. The plan has been
revised an now has one lake in each jurisdiction, co ected by an underground pipe. Ms.
Clarke . (1' the site was very barren and has not re getated since being stripped. However,
there , several heavy tree areas and two mvin
.
,
,
~
M . Clarke said the road system is still the 'e. It features a bikepath on the east side of e
p street shown as Campden Lakes Driv East and West. The public park dedication' ten
acres which is about double the C<>9 requirement. Public areas are located utting
Wedgewood Hills and along Summitvi.~ Road. The developer has agreed to improv e 8-acre
park on Summitview Road as a non-' rts park, including hikepath and landscapi ,subject to
the Parks Director's approval., 1)1/ lake and other reserves will be private ope ace of about
13 acres. There is a stub stree~ the east into the Conine property. f'
~
'/
~
The density is just about, " e lot per acre, the lots are generally ove 100 feet wide. The
rezoning plan contained, lots, and two of them were eliminated. ....
A traffic study was bmitted with the Wedgewood Hills rezoni application, and it indicated
that a signal was urrently warranted at the intersection of ~ mitview Road and Riverside ...-I
Drive. The de elopers of Wedgewood and this site will d 'gn the intersection widening and
signalization lans. This was determined to be their ~ propriate share for off-site traffic
improvem ts. A left-turn stacking lane and street l~ ting will be installed on Summitview
Road at e entry.
This site will not be serviced by the Dublin/Co mbus sanitary sewer system. There is a
contract between the City of Dublin and Dela are County, covering Wedgewood Hills,
and the Conine property, to provide sanit. sewer service.
The county line runs east/we, .... through the development, ' and ther
jurisdktionalJemergency confusion'/- Staff recommends that the county line be pos , preferably
with the Dublin wood-routed /. ration limit signs. The lake is not intend for swimming
and boating, but the fire de ment has requested clear, unobs~cted a ss for emergency
purposes including an ar o launch a rescue boat. The developer will the scuth end of
the lake clear. Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
...
"'-1
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 11, 1996
Page 13
Mr. Sullivan agreed that s ctures mounted above grade with po es should have masonry.
accessibility and fair h ing require that they be at grade. ase could be entertained, b s
personal feeling was egative. Mr. Ferrara did not say the ntire building perimeter sho d be
brick course, but tha e beauty was in the details. Mr. Su van said he did not want to it on
a limited amount 0 facade. This is four-sided architect e and consistency is impo
~"",""" Mr. Rauh mad the motion to table this application s requested for design and
issues, and M . Boring seconded. The vote was as fI ows: Mr. Harlan, yes; Mr. errara, yes;
Mr. Pep10 yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Chinn' -Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, es; and Mr.
"" Rauh, ye (Tabled 7-0.)
6. zoning Application Z96-005 - Galli
J Reynolds, attorney, requested tablin . He wanted to meet with staf to review issues in the
staff report. Mr. Ferrara made the m . on to table this case and Mr utphen seconded. The
vote was as follows: Mr. Harlan, yes; . Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, y ; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher,
yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; and Mr. Su en, yes. (Tabled 6-0.)
,~ 7. Rezoning Application Z96-006 - Preliminary Development Plan - Wilcox Estates
Lisa Fierce presented this case and distributed a memo dated July 11, 1996 to the Commission.
The concept plan was approved by the Commission in May and by Council in June. The Heather
Glen subdivision and Balgriffin abut the site. The site is flat with trees along its west and north
sides. The remnants remain of a house foundation, a grave, stone marker, and a well. Wilcox
Road Associates owns the entire 15 acres, and Dublin is contracting to buy the residual nine acres
....,,.. for a linear park and the Woerner-Temple extension. Nom Street will be extended through the
site to connect with Heather Glen, Section 3.
ftoiic'w."~ Ms. Fierce said Dublin will construct the Woerner-Temple extension as part of the Thomas-
Kohler rezoning commitments. The plan has 16 single-family lots and the density is 2.6 du/ac.
The average lot frontage is 72 feet with a minimum of 61 feet. Staff is requesting that a minimum
of 63 feet be provided which is consistent with other subdivisions. The minimum lot depth is 123
feet. Lots 11 and 12 are much deeper and average 274 feet deep, due to a detention pond on the
rear of them. However, detention for this site may actually be located within the Heather Glen,
Section 1 phase. All development standards are consistent with surrounding subdivisions, and
they include a six-foot minimum side yard with a 12-foot combined side yard, a 25-foot setback,
and a rear yard of 20 percent of the lot depth.
Two parcels are proposed for par~ dedication, totaling one acre and meeting Code. Ms. Fierce
said Nom Street had been realigned to be consistent with Balgriffin. Lot 6 will be slightly
changed, but it will not affect the lot depth or frontage. Staff requests that additional parkland
IIII!IF''1''Il
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 11, 1996
Page 14
be dedicated, or that the southern property line of Lot 6 be adjusted to be more perpendicular to
Nom Street. The minimum park depth should be 105 feet from Woerner-Temple Road.
Ms. Fierce said when this proposal was previously reviewed by the Commission, the applicant
committed that the grave site and remnant of the property existing on the site be backed out of the
parkland dedication requirement. Staff believes that the grave site is an appropriate park of the
parkland for historical purposes and does not believe it should be backed out. ~
A IS-foot no-build zone is proposed along the rear of Lot 6 and part of Lot 5. Staff requests that
it be extended along Lots 1-5. A tree survey is still outstanding. The IS-foot no-build zone ...
proposed may need to be augmented to provide adequate tree preservation. A 15-foot no-build
zone is shown on the rear of Lots 7 and 8 along the park. It should be continued along the
remaining lots abutting future parkland and along the north lots for preservation of the treerow.
The final design of the lots may be impacted by the results of the tree survey.
Staff recommends that the applicant provide some type of physical separation, either fencing or
landscaping, between the lots and the park. Staff is requesting a note on fence restrictions and a
text commitment to install street trees. She said staff recommends approval with eight conditions:
1) That the minimum lot frontage be widened to 63 feet;
2) That the 15-foot no-build zone be expanded to the rear of Lots 1-6, 11-12, a no-build
zone be established on the north side of Lots 1 and 16 (side yard), and a 15-foot no-build
zone be established to the rear of Lots 9 and 10, to protect the existing trees, to the
satisfaction of staff and that lot lines be redrawn if necessary;
3) That the no-build zone be more fully defined to prohibit all structures, decks, fences,
satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing sets;
4) That a plan be submitted to the satisfaction of staff to provide separation between public
property (park) and private property (single-family lots);
5) That the southern property line of Lot 6 be realigned to provide a minimum of 105 feet .....
as measured from Woerner-Temple Road to Lot 6;
6) That a tree preservation plan be submitted outlining the limits of tree protection by snow -
fencing;
7) That fencing restrictions be provided within the text and a commitment be made to install
street trees and sidewalks (along all new streets built by the developer); and
8) That all conditions be met, and a revised text and plan be submitted subject to staff
approval, prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing by City Council.
Mr. Sutphen asked about bikepaths along Woerner-Temple Road. Ms. Fierce said it should be
installed as part of the road construction. The Southwest Area plan includes a bikepath ~ong the
north side of Woerner-Temple Road.
Chris Cline, attorney for Rockford Homes, accepted the conditions above. He asked that staff
work with them on the north side of the 15-foot no-build zone on the side yards of Lots 1 and 16,
which could pose a footprint problem with the 63-foot lot width. He said the tree survey would
determine the location. Ms. Fierce agreed.
III
i
. . '~'"" --~~~='","
__.,,_'w n~_.~'_'_,._'__
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 11, 1996
Page 15
Mr. Cline said regarding storm water detention, he expected that to tie into the 60-inch stormwater
line along the north side of the property, with retention in Heather Glen, Section 1. The pond
will then be removed from this site
Mr. Peplow made the motion to approve this application because the use and density are consistent
with existing development patterns; it conforms to the requirements of the PUD District, enlarges
_"""'!II an existing park, and complies with the Southwest Area Plan, with eight conditions:
1) That the minimum lot frontage be widened to 63 feet;
2) That the 15-foot no-build be expanded to the rear of Lots 1-6, 11-12, a no-build zone be
.',..,-", established on the north side of Lots 1 and 16 (side yard), and a 15-foot no-build zone be
established to the rear of Lots 9 and 10, to protect the existing trees, to the satisfaction of
staff, and that lot lines be redrawn if necessary;
3) That the no-build zone be more fully defmed to prohibit all structures, decks, fences,
satellite dish antennae, swimming pools, and swing sets;
4) That a plan be submitted to the satisfaction of staff to provide separation between public
property (park) and private property (single-family lots);
5) That the southern property line of Lot 6 be realigned to provide a minimum of 105 feet
(for green space) measured from Woerner-Temple Extended;
6) That a tree preservation plan be submitted outlining the limits of tree protection by snow
fencing;
7) That fencing restrictions be provided within the text and a commitment be made to install
street trees and sidewalks (along all new interior streets); and
8) That all conditions be met, and a revised text and plan be submitted subject to staff
approval, prior to this case being scheduled for public hearing by City Council.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Sutphen. The applicant agreed with the modified conditions.
Rft~ The vote was as follows: Mr. Harlan, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici-
Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 7-0.)
.;..--' The meeting adjourned at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
:~l~~
Planning Division Secretary
-
_ _r_""_"~__~_~~
RECORD OF PROCEEUtNGti
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14 Meeting
----...- _....~... -. .---
-....-. "a;.VriiN ~E.CaAL eL.AfOtK ~ ~Y"l"I N\J, 1"'''. -,..- ,-- -.. .. -.'..-----
! n
:I
June 17, 1996 I;
HeM 19_
_.:;.~"!=-:~.::..:..-~ . .hU_ -.-. ,_. .. ,_. n __ _.. ---.., '........ II ._...~ .
II
time of final plat how cut-throu2h c will be discouragoo in the fu ii
i IJ
" Mr. Hale sta that this was agreeable.
I!
" Mr.Cam I suggested replacing condition #1 Ii
I'
" indicated his agreement.
1
" 'I
! II
. Zawaly moved to approve the prer II
I, with all of the conditiona as pres H
ii
'I ..
L II
:!
" 11
H II ......
,; I,
"
.. ii
i 2 (Applicant: II
" MIl Scho tein Homes, Inc., 41 S. High Str Suite 2410, Columbus, OR 4 15) 'I
., Ms.C ke stated that Sheffield Place is a a ivision located on the north aide Brand Road, to
~ ! "
ij the t of Coventry Woods Drive. She eJ.d Place connects Coventry W with the Brandon il
" division. This is the tinal plat for n 2 whid1 includes 30 single., . y homes. The site II
"
!:
" is zoned PLR. The Planning Co . sion recommended approval in A it by a vote of 4-1. There Ii
I'
" were four conditions of approv . ii
i
i! 1. That a street tree pI e submitted to the satisfaction of ; Ii
2. That notes regard' development standards, fencing, parking zones, and no-build zo h
be includoo on final plat; i'
,[
3. That vehicul access be prohibited on Brand R il
i\ 4. That a flv oot sidewalk be installed along
I; 0'
il
i
j:
:j i
,
Ii II
r il
,; !I
.,. Conceot Plan - Wilcox Estates (Applicant: Rockford Homes, Ii
,I
Bridge Street, Dublin, OH 43017) !I
Ms. Clarke stated that this development proposal is for a piece of land located between Balgrlffln II
and Heather Glen Section 3. The current zoning is R-1B, a Washington township zoning I,
classification. The proposal is for new single-family homes on 16 lots. She emphasized that the p IIl!IlIIII
concept plan approval is a non-binding vote by Planning Commission and Council. il
!i
" She noted that there was a rezoning proposal to PLR about a year ago for this land. Staff Ii
0,
j! recommended disapproval and it was tabled at Planning Commission. Staff worked with an outside 'I ...
consultant to identify better layouts than what was proposed by the developer. However, due to the II
;' alignment of the W oemer- Temple connector just to the south of the site, it was difficult to come up Ii
.. with a better alignment that was financially feasible in the marketplace. i'
.' ,I
II
i: "
;1 "
Ii Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of this proposal as consistent with the 'I
Southwest Area Plan and PUD district. It also provides the opportunity to expand the parkland I.
il
Ii along the Woerner-Temple extension. Planning Commission recommended approval on May 16, II
:; 1996 with 3 conditions: Ii
; ~ 1. That the grave site area be subtracted from the park land requirement, unless it is Ii
i' determined that there is DO grave at this site; 11
2. That final disposition of the Wilcox Road Associates residual parcel (north and south sid~ d
of Woerner-Temple extension) be determined at the time of preliminary development plan Ii
review; and j:
3. That the applicant formally withdraw the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, II
rezoning application by letter to staff. i!
;i Chris Cline 37 W Brid2e Street. representing the applicant noted that Donald Wick of Rockford ~ I
,I
.'
Homes is also present. "
"
" He stated that this L-shaped piece is known as the Woodin tract and consists of 17 acres. There are :1
'I
16 lots of similar size to those in Heather Glen and other neighboring subdivisions. WilcolC Road I,
" Associates sold this piece to Rockford Homes. The only unusual feature Is the gravestone, and it
.. i'
;= is uncertain at this time if anyone is buried on this site. If 50, the person will be moved. The desire ,I
':
, "
296-006 .....
Wilcox Est;:ltp.<;:
------...--.,...,,-......, """"-~- H'_~'_~-"-O" 'N.."""_'.~".,'.. .'.'.'_.,..,__._.,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Pago 15 Meeting
~"'-".._. --, ~-----
-JlI.\1:P" LUML ......NI\ '-Vo. ,.u~ I'fQ, t1:A"Z...... . --- "'---. -
::
:, Helrl June 17, 1996 19_ !L
_.-...'.,*~.:-:.;. .. - - ---~. . -,-
!1
of tho City is that they remount the tombstone appropriately. ji
i II
ii
Mr. Zawaly moved to approve tho Concept Plan for Wilcox Estates subject to the conditions of ii
" Planning & Zoning Commission. II
Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. 'I
! I; Vote on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga. yes; Mrs. Boring. yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Campbell, Ii
:: yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. I,
~ , !I
;1 "
:1 i!
,j il
:1 "
!; ii
~ ~ ! !I
1; II
; ~ tt stated that the next m is scheduled for July 18, 1 6 at 7 Ii
,i s will be the second part of e MSI cost study analysis lew and Ii
"
,I to Council members.
tho Columbus Feis have "
:. !!
"
;, i
ii I
:!
:'
~ i I
,i 11
II
H il
"
:I I'
.1 !i
" ii
I; !:
, ji
:; es; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. ,\
i h, yes. l;
r .,
!i
!j will meet on June 26 at 5 p.m.. ii
\: discussion of the interView pro 'i
1: II
'i L
"
:i ,
stated that they will meet on Fri ;\
'I Ii
is currently reviewing the fence '\
- ~ i \\
ii Ii
I Ii
:i
Ii
,; i:
"
- Mr. McCas then moved that a task for be established comprised of repr entatives of Planning "
:i II
" and , residents. developers. b ness owners and the Community evelopment CommIttee
n to und e a rewrite of the City's I dscape and street tree codes in or to clarify, clean up and ii
i refine eir provisions in 1I2ht of neil's stated goals and desires of e community to protect and ii
11 enh e the visual qualities of th city. 'I
:! Mr Campbell seconded the mo n. I:
!I v. n - Mu. S' well, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; . Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; !I
Ii
:1 ayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms ide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. McC yes. 'I
II
!I Mr. McCash commented at another item on previous Co as It
j; has been working wi adjacent townships on land use green space and other issues of utual I
II
I' interest. He propos that the Community Deve10pm t Committee initiate discussions 'th the / I:
~ ! adjacent township eas on working together for the' provement of the overall area. 1\
" I,
:I I
slon, Mr. McCash moved that e Community Development Co II
!: work with the townships regar . g zoning, land use, and green sp !!
!' !j
that are ou e Dublin's corporate borders. i ~
;i Mrs. Still ell seconded the motion. II
;; n - Mr. Campbell, yes; . McCash, yes; Mr. Zaw:
;i e Pittaluga, yes; Mrs, Stillwell, es; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
ii or Kranstuber, mm on mmitt'. Z96-006
"
ii pbell met with representatives om the Public Information and ~ Wilcox Estates
"
I,
I'
'.
;1
"
-
-
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CO:MMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
May 16, 1996
<:lTY OF (){BU!\
....
5800 Shier Rings Road
DublIn, 0" 43016-1236
Phone/IDD: 614/161-6550
Fax: 614/161-6506 ...
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
4. Concept Plan - Wilcox Estates
Location: 6.1 acres located at the southern terminus. of Nom Street, approximately 375
feet west of Wilcox Road.
Existing Zoning: R-1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township
classification) .
Request: Review of a concept plan under the provisions of Section 153.056.
Proposed Use: A single-family neighborhood of 16 lots and 1.0 acre of parkland.
Applicant: Rockford Homes, clo Chris Cline, Attorney, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin,
Ohio 43017.
MOTION: To approve this concept plan because the use and density proposed are consistent
with existing development patterns and the Southwest Area Plan, it conforms to the
requirements of the pun District, and enlarges the abutting park, with the
following three conditions:
IIIIIIlI
I) That the grave site area be subtracted from the park land requirement, unless it is
determined that there is no grave at this site;
2) That final disposition of the Wilcox Road Assoicates residual parcel (north and south .....
sides of Woerner-Temple extension) be determined at the time of preliminary
development plan review; and
3) That the applicant formally withdraw the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential
District, rezoning application by letter to staff.
* Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 5-0.
RESULT: This concept plan was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council for
consideration with a positive recommendatio: \: c~+~~~
AS sUSr"lTTED TO COU"CIL Jf/ll - ( Z96-006
to/L3/rL FOR r,,[Emir; o"le!l1!f?- ' Wilcox Estates
...
. '__~_'~~"'_""~_"_""'''''~'"~,;~_~><<~~."". ".,__._."~< 11 :-. 1J1I1i11lJ:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
._._.._~~~~ of ~blin City Council Meeting .__ Page 14 Meeting
_., .. .. !' ....0;.-..0. ..-.. ...... """ ",.. ..... ,~.. .-. .d -..... ......~-
I'
HeM June 17, 1996 19_ .
_.=.~...~ .. ..... ..... ._ ..." .-. ..... . .... --..... . ,. ... II .. ..
II
i.
. time of final plat how cut-throu2h II
: Mr. Bale sta that this was agreeable. ii
ji Mr. Cam I suggested replacing condition #1 II
;' indicated his agreement. jl
...'. :i II
, . Zawely moved to approve the pre!' II
" with all of the conditions as pres ii
_'" lj 1'1
:; I
:: 'I
\i II
.i j.
.,
" h
SchottenStein Homes, c/o Bit estbrook. II
;i MIl Scho in Homes, Inc., 41 S. High Str Suite 2410, Columbus, OH 4 15) 'I
!: Ms. C ke stated that Sheffield Place is a s aivision located on the north sido Brand Road, to I.
Ii the t of Coventry Woods Drive. She eld Place connects Coventry W s with the Brandon iI
,: division. This is the final plat for on 2 which includes 30 single., . y homes. The site II
Ii is zoned PLR.. The Planning Co . sion recommended approval in by a vote of 4-1. There Ii
'I were four conditions of approv . ji
i! 1. That a street tree pI e submitted to the satisfaction of ; Ii
.' 2. That notes reglll'd' development st311dards, fencing, par1dng zones, and no-build zo Ii
.. be included on final plat; H
. 3. That vehicul access be prohibited on Brand R il
i: 4. That a flv oat sidewalk be installed along ii
;. moved to approve the finel pIa ubject to the conditions of P i
i
. . '
:; ~
L il
, II
i Conceot Plan - Wilcox Estates (Applicant: Rockford Homes, !\
_". T Bridge Street, Dublin, OH 43017) 11
Ms. Clarke stated that this development proposal is for a piece of land located betWeen Balgrlffin il'
and Heather Glen Section 3. The current zoning is R-IB. a Washington township zoning t
classification. The proposal is for new single-family homes on 16 lots. She emphasized that the iil
...~, concept plan approval is a non-binding vote by Planning Commission and Council. !i
;; She noted that there was a rezoning proposal to PLR about a year ago for this bnd. Staff Ii
, recommended disapproval and it was tabled at Planning Commission. Staff worked with an outside II
'i consultant to identify better layouts than what was proposed by the developer. However, due to the 1,1
;, alignment of the Woerner-Temple connector just to the south of the site, it was difficult to come up ,j
:i with a better alignment that was finanCially feasible in the marketplace. Ii
" e
;: Staff and Planning Commission recommend. approval of this proposal as consistent with the :\
:' Southwest Area Plan and pun district. It also provides the opportunity to expand the parlcland !'
ii along ~e Woern~:Temple extension. Planning Commission recommended approval on May 16, \1
,: 1996 With 3 conditions: Ii
! 1. That the grave site area be subtracted from the park land requirement, unless it is 'Ii
:' determined that there is no grave at this site; II
2. That fmal disposition of the Wilcox Road Associates residual parcel (north and south sides 1'\
of Woerner-Temple extension) be determined at the time ~of preliminary development plan "
review; and r
3. That the applicant formally withdraw the PLR, Planned Low Density :Residential District, i
rezoning application by letter to staff. Ii
i Chris Cline. 37 W Brid2e Street. representing the applicant noted that Donald Wick of Rockford
Homes is also present. Z96-006
. He stated that this L-shaped piece is known as the Woodin tract and consists of 17 acres. There are W'l X Estates
16 lots of similar size to those In Heather Glen and other neighboring subdivisions. Wilcox Road 1 CO
Associates sold this piece to Rockford Homes. The only unusual feature is the gravestone, and it
.""'" is uncertain at this time if anyone is buried on this site. If so, the person will be moved. The desire
\1
_.- .~~
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 15 Meeting
....,.-.... --~--
.._. . ~~ .......N'" co.. fOHflll NQ, llAu...... .. -... . . ----. -
::
Heln lune 17, 1996 jj
., 19 :'==-=
--~""'..''l,:t'::::.;._~. -_..~. . -j
!!
of the City is that they remount the tombstone appropriately. ji
II
Mr. ~wa1y mo;red to app.ro~e the Concept Plan for Wilcox Estates subject to the conditions of Ii
;i PlannlIli &: Zonang Comnusslon. II
" Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. 'I ....
;, Vote on tho motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga. yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stlllwell, yes; Mr. Campbell, I'
, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mayor Kramtuber, yes. ,i
II
~ : "
i! ...
.j j'
:! .1
"
~ ~ ii
!I
L~ II
;; Mr Zawaly, is scheduled for July 18, 1 6 at 7 !:
.j 1'. . at the 5800 Building. e MSI cost study analysis lew and Ii
..
j e agenda has been forw
.j
(: Mr. Zawaly also reported at the Columbus Feis have "
Ii
~ ! grant of $5,000. The gr t was made under the ass on that the City would own o dance floor !
H and store it for the Fei. However, City ownership ould require that the danc oor be built to I
.! City standards. Mor Vet, the City does not have torage facilities adequate fo the floor. Based
~ ;
, upon those facts, th recommendation is that $7,S be granted to the Colum
'I Peis instead of the I
grant of $5,000 p iously approved by Counc' . 11
" II
j
:i il
"
,I I'
,I !I
" ii
I! ,:
I ii
,. ,I
I Ii
: ;i
! ~ ..
Ii
'I
" II
., I
'I !:
'1 " ..
stated that they will meet on Fri ii
'I is currently reviewing the fence il
~ ; proposed by the C mmittee and staff is wor' on a proposal for replacement the sandwich I!
i'
I board signs at 1 . Other items referred to e committee at goal setting incl e discussion of i ....
! greenspace pro sions for commercial zoni s. and the landscape/street tree e enhancements. Ii
d
,.
, j ~
h
Mr. McCas then moved that a task for be established comprised of repr entatives of Planning "
,j I'
q and Zo . , residents, developers, b esa owners and the Community evelopment Committee II
n to und e a rewrite of the City.s I dscape and street tree codes in or to clarify, clean up and ji
i refine eir provisions in li2ht of ncil's stated goals and desires of e community to protect and .,
iI
it enh e the visual qualities of th city. 'I
" Mr Campbell seconded the mo n. I:
!i v. o n - Mrs. S' well, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; . Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; ,I
H
'I ayor Kranstubet, yes; Ms ide Pittaiuga, yes; Mr. Mc yes. :1
II
il Mr. McCash commented 1 another item on previous 'ty Development Committee a I~
"
i' has been working wi adjacent townships on land use green space and other issues of utua!
d II
I' interest. He propos that the Community Developm t Committee initiate discussions .th the !:
I! adjacent township eas on working together for the' provement 'Of the overall area. 'I
I,
i
II
!!
!I
ji Z96-006
!j Wilcox Estates
I,
II
II ~
I,
"",~--",,",,""- 0__
~~~--~-"~-~~--
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - May 16, 1996
Page 10
Ms. Boring said she depended upon the en . ring comments on drainage. She was concerned
about monitoring. She was excited th e business was expanding in Du in. Mr. Ferrara
agreed with her comments. Ms. Chi ci-Zuercher suggested that a formal tter to Council or
the City Manager about the City. tion issue rather than condition a ed to this case.
f this plan because it conforms to the B . meter Center text and
- other Dublin development dards, respects the relationship to a r . ential area, and meets the
City's long term econo c development goals, with the follo . six conditions:
1) That signifi design upgrades, such as accent ban . g, additional windows, andlor
IiiIllM-Ml landscap . used on the north elevation, subject staff approval;
2) That north elevation be clad in brick either en the future (phase 3) expansion
cons cted or by May 31,2001, whichever rs first;
3) landscaping comply with Code;
4) at any dead, dying, or missing lan pe material identified during a lan pe
inspection to be conducted prior to iss ce of occupancy, be replaced prior to . suance
of final occupancy;
5) That a plant relocation plan be su . tted which outlines how and when the
material will be moved, subj to approval by staff; and
6) That exterior lighting con m to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines.
Ms. Boring seconded the m n and the vote was as follows: Mr. Harl es; Mr. Peplow, yes;
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher es; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes (Approved 5.,.0.)
Mr. Ferrara ma a motion that the Commission send a lett of encouragement to the City
Engineer with py to City Council that follow-up test case e done on the performance of the .
MORPC . e standards because of this testimony. M. Banchefsky suggested directing the
- letter to the City Manager. Mr. Ferrara asked that the etatec case particularly be investigated.
Mr. Peplow seconded the motion, and the vote w s follows: Mr. Harlan, yes; Mr. Ferrara,
yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; and Ms. Boring, .yes. (Approved 5-0.)
-
~ 4. Concept Plan - Wilcox Fmates
Lisa Fierce presented this PUD concept plan. A PLR rezoning was filed in 1995 and tabled by
the Commission, and this is a revised plan. The site abuts both Heather Glen and the future
Balgriffin development. She said one of the area's major roadway improvements is the Woerner-
Temple extension. It is to be a four-lane road, with a landscaped median, and' have a right-of-
way of 100 feet. Nom Street will be extended north-south through the site.
The foundation of a old farmhouse, the remnants of a well, and grave stone are located on the site.
The applicant will examine the site with an archaeological expert to determine if there is a grave.
Ms. Fierce said the site was 6.1 acres which included a proposal for 16 single-family lots of
varying size. The overall density is 2.6 dulac, which is consistent with developments such as
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
-
~ --,.~--"-_.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - May 16, 1996
Page 11
Heather Glen, Trinity Park, Brighton Park. The proposal includes a one-acre park, meeting the
Code requirement. The park is located on the northeast and northwest corners of Woerner-Temple
and Nom Street. The smaller piece will connect to the Balgriffin park. Ms. Fierce said the
applicant has agreed to subtract any grave area from the park acreage used to meet the code
requirement.
Ms. Fierce said the 6.1 acre parcel is owned by Wilcox Road Associates and is part of a IS-acre IIIIIIII
parcel abutting the south side. Staff retained the services of a land planning consultant for
alternatives layouts of the whole IS acres, none of which seemed viable. The City may consider ...
acquisition of the residual parcels for park purposes. The City administration expects to discuss
acquisition issues with Council within the next few weeks. This issue should be settled prior to
consideration of the preliminary development plan for Wilcox Estates.
Staff is recommending approval of this concept plan with the following three conditions which
have been amended since the staff report was issued:
1) That the grave site area be subtracted from the park land requirement, unless no grave is
determined to be there;
2) That final disposition of the Wilcox Road Associates residual parcel (north and south sides
of Woemer- Temple extension) be determined at the time of preliminary development plan
review; and
3) That the applicant formally withdraw the PLR rezoning application by letter to Staff.
Mr. Foegler said the Thomas-Kohler rezoning obligated construction of Woerner-Temple within
a time frame. The right-of-way needs to be purchased, and perhaps the residuals. He said there
was difficulty in laying out the residuals, and staff will probably recommend that Council proceed
with negotiations for acquisition of the entire residual.
-
Mr. Ferrara asked if the northernmost parcel owned by Wilcox Road Associates was included in
this application. Ms. Fierce said no. Mr. Ferrara did not like the small parcel not being included.
-
Mr. Foegler said the Woerner-Temple right-of-way was needed through that location. He said
the applicant and Dublin investigated layouts for logical single-family development based upon
the parcel configurations and the known street extensions. He said it could become a gateway.
Ms. Boring asked why the grave site would be subtracted from the parkland dedication
requirement. Ms. Fierce said the applicant committed to it.
Ms. Boring asked if there were any use for the residual areas. Ms. Fierce said only residential
use was considered. Ms. Boring asked about an ice cream store to provide local services. Mr.
Foegler said a major neighborhood center is zoned at the comer of Tuttle Crossing and Wilcox
Road. Ms. Fierce said a small commercial site is at Avery Road and Woerner-Temple Road.
Chris Cline, attorney for Rockford Homes, distributed the original plan for the Woodin tract
prepared in 1980. It showed 42 lots that are larger than those in Heather Glen. Since then,
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
IIIIlI
!. ~ ,'''';'''If
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - May 16, 1996
Page 12
Dublin decided upon the Woerner-Temple extension, and its alignment goes across the parcel and
causes a problem. He said Wllcox Road Associates offered to sell Dublin their parcel six months
ago. He said the Bee property would also be cut by the proposed road. He supported Dublin's
acquisition of that parcel as a window into the Heather Glen Park.
""'''l! Mr. Cline thought the body in the grave site had been removed and buried elsewhere without
moving the tombstone. He said even if no one is buried there, they will remount the tombstone
and place a fence around it.
Ms. Boring said City Council had not been approached about acquiring the parcel. Mr. Cline said
the City would either buy it voluntarily or take it to install the road, but it is Council's decision.
Mr. Ferrara found the ten-page historical report interesting. He asked if a concept plan could be
changed. Mr. Cline said the application was filed as a combined' preliminary development
planlconcept plan, but staff only wanted to present the concept plan. If the Commission wanted
to direct them a different way with the layout, they would do that. Mr. Ferrara said the last time
this was reviewed, it was a PLR and tabled. The layout is the same and it is now a PUD. Mr.
Cline still preferred using the PLR even though the site is less than fifteen acres.
Mr. Ferrara asked if there were existing easements to pipe stormwater to Heather Glen. Randy
Bowman said routing the stormwater up through Heather Glen, Section 3 or a pipe along Wilcox
Road could work. No detailed engineering has been reviewed with this concept plan.
Ms. Boring said this appeared to be piecemeal by virtue because of what was left over.
Mr. Peplow asked about Mr. Curry's access and would Nom Street extend south through the
- development. Ms. Fierce said yes. Ms. Fierce said when Woerner-Temple Road is extended,
between Wilcox Road and Avery Road, the "T" intersection proposed at Nom and Rings Roads
will be made. That will hopefully alleviate some of the through traffic Mr. Curry is experiencing.
- The through movement will then be north to Woerner-Temple Road.
Mr. Curry said he was concerned with the construction traffic on Rings Road trying to get into
the project. He would like the construction traffic to stay off the school bus route.
Mr. Peplow said this was a large puzzle of development that was beginning to be brought
together. He said this development fits well with the surrounding development.
Ms. Boring said it appeared to be an awkward layout. Ms. Fierce said there may/ be other
alternatives, and mainly the residual was examined. Viable alternatives were not found. Ms.
Boring said the road connection was necessary.
Mr. Ferrara agreed it was awkward. He trusted in the planning vision for roadways and parks,
but there were no guarantees. He would be uncomfortable voting for approval at this time.
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
-
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - May 16, 1996
Page 13
Mr. Peplow moved for approval of this concept plan because the use and density proposed are
consistent with existing development patterns and the Southwest Area Plan, it conforms to the
PUD requirements, and enlarges the abutting park, with the following three conditions:
1) That the grave site area be subtracted from the park land requirement, unless it is
determined that there is no grave at this site;
2) That final disposition of the Wilcox Road Associates residual parcel (north and south sides
of Woerner-Temple extension) be determined at the time of preliminary development plan ....
review; and
3) That the applicant formally withdraw the PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District,
rezoning application by letter to staff. -
Mr. Harlan seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Ms. Boring, yes;
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Harlan, yes; and Mr. Peplow, yes. (Approved 5-0.)
5. Revised Final Development Plan - Coffman Park - Carport Conversion - 6665 Coffman
Road
Bobbie Clarke presented this re . ed [mal development plan for co rsion of Dublin's 2,000
square foot carport. The Ci as a short term need for office ce, and the proposal is to
convert the carport to finish office space, with water and sewer eat and air conditioning, and
to add a four-bay parki garage on the west side of the build. g.
Ms. Boring said s was advised that because City Counci presenting this application, she has
a conflict of in est. She recused herself and left the m.
Ms. Clar said the dumpster near the existing will be screened in connection with c ent .....
.on. The Coffman Road side of the rt will be enclosed and have window doors
more finished appearance. It will be co ected to the main building by an une osed roof
cture. Asphalt parking will be elimina underneath it, creating two separat arking lots. -
Staff believes it should have a sign indi .ng it is "staff' or "personnel and pu asing" parking
lot plus a turnaround of some type at end. The existing building material e cedar and stone
and will be continued.
Ms. Clarke said historically, ffman Park has been used for a v . ty of uses. It was the first
major land acquisition u rtaken by the Village of Dublin. e maintenance, police and
development services hay ince been relocated. The access p or the recreation center requires
razing the remaining . ntenance buildings beyond the p ng lot.
After Coffman ad is widened and Emerald Parkw is completed, the carport will be very
visible. City Hall will be on the comer of two, e-Iane roads. Staff believes this carport
conversion solves a short-term municipal spa roblem. Because the Community Plan is
underway, including a community facilities dy, this would be the wrong time to undertake
a major expansion to City Hall.
Z96-OO6
Wilcox Estates
....
i
LI1'" '~r ~.
UUBLIN PLANING AND ZONING COM:MlSSION
RECORD OF ACTION
FEBRUARY 9, 1995
(ITY OF Ul"BLl\
.....~
I
I
-
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regularly scheduled
meeting:
4. Rezoning Application Z94-018 - Wilcox &tates
Location: 5.308 acres located at the southern terminus of Nom Street, approximately
375 feet west of Wilcox Road, behind two single-family residences.
Existing Zoning: R-1B, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Twp.)
Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: A single-family neighborhood of 16 lots (no additional parkland).
Applicant: Donald Wick, Rockford Homes Inc., c/o Christopher T. Cline, 37 West
Bridge Street, Dublin, OH 43017.
MOTION #1: To disapprove this rezoning application because the plan does not advance or
conform to the thoroughfare pl:ms for the area; the park as set aside does not
advance the City's open space goals; the use of planned districts is encouraged
to foster imaginative design and sensitivity to the environment, but neither goal
is achieved in this case; and the layout may detract fmm development potential
of surrounding sites.
Ji.ilI>,..--"-'
VOTE: 1-4.
RESULT: The motion failed.
MOTION #2: To t4ble this rezoning application as requested by the applicant.
VOTE: 4-1.
RESULT~ This rewning application was tabled.
ST AFF CERTIFICATION
~~ ~T~
mas J. u .....L - - --
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
.,,,-41
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
- Minutes - February 9, 1995
. Page 15
5) Properl Identify all building matP,rials;
6) Land ping treatment along the north operty line;
7) Ar Itectural palette be earthtone co rs; and
8) vised site plan having the mand ory 50-foot setback along the west pr perty line.
Mr. Zawaly made the motion', ~table this application and Mr. F._ seconded the motion. ...
;
Ms. Clarke said the lands pe buffer requirement behind th mgl~-family houses had not been
enforced. This is a Ci . esponsibility. The alignment of ilcox Road clearly was, in rezoning ....
text, different from way it was built. She believed aul Willis was the City Engineer at the
time and he appr ed the realignment. She had explanation. Ms. Clarke said the Staff
endorsed the It posed product, architecture, an aensity. The rooflines were broken up, all
elevations ar ighly detailed, and this is an ou ding product. I\. should not be lost ove~~e
building the siding color.
innici-Zuercher said the appli t indicated he would comply with the I
ut. Mr. Dioun agreed and rifled that he purchased the land from
pany. He felt both comp . es shared the landscaping responsibility. e solicited Staffs
support in his going back to wards Land Company for enforcement. r. Dioun said he will
take final responsibility.
Mr. Zawaly comm ded Mr. Dioun for the response made at lS meeting and his willingness
to work with S f.
, ,
Ms. Chi. ci-Zuercher said the City Engineer shoul~ ~solve the cur~cut issue with develo r
and ne . borhood input.
/.
~ ...
vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman,.....yj ; Mr. Peplow, yes; 11s. Chinni'ci-Zu
r. Zawaly, yes; and Mr. Ferrara;::.es. abled 5-0.) .'. .....
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher thankeJ neighbors for :Jeir input.
* 4. Rezoning Application Z94-018 - Wilcox Estates
Tom Rubey presented this rezoning application for 5.3 acres located directly south of the
Heather Glen subdivision. The change proposed is from R-IB, Restricted Suburban Residential
District, to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District to permit 16 single-family lots with
0.1 acres of parkland. Tnis property is part of a larger parcel of approximately 15 acres.
Access will be provided from the existing Heather Glen, Section 3 through Nom Street and a
second street. Along the south boundary is a foundation of the old Wilcox farmhouse and a
gravestone. The applicant is proposing to dedicate 0.1 acres of parkland to preserve that portion
of the old Wilcox homestead. There are two older single-family homes located on the property
with frontage on Wilcox Road. All of the proposed lots will have approximately 63 feet of
frontage, consistent with Heather Glen. Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
..
_"'M __,_._,~,.,"'."""""",,-,,',~""'~r",,.._~,.,, ,"-".,' .
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
. Minutes - February 9, 1995
Page 16
The lots have varying depths, from 100 feet to 274 feet. Staff feels the PLR zoning category
was adopted to encourage imaginative site layouts and does not feel this proposal responds to
that. By code, a rezoning request for the PLR zoning district requires a minimum of IS acres.
The applicant requests a variance from that Code requirement. Staff supports the use of single-
family homes, but not the use of the PLR district. Of particular concern are how and where the
stub road would extend. The applicant has additionally been asked for plans of how the
.... remaining property to the east, south, and wrst would dev~lop with this proposal. The plans
were included in the Commission packets. Staff was not satisfied with the results of those
studies. The Woerner-Temple exten~ion extends from the west to the east, south of this
- property . It bisects the Bee property, to the west, and the subject site. Staff feels that a
comprehensive plan for the entire arra is necessary to give a positive endorsement. Staff feels
in light of the Balgriffin development to the south, as well as the Woerner-Temple extension
through this site, that ther: are stiUlarge and significant issues that need to be addressed.
With respect to the gravesite, Staff is i:1 the process of securing a study of this site to fmd out
if, and where graves may be located. With this information, Staff will be better able to
determine where the Woerner-Temple ~xtension ann the Nom Street extension should be located.
Staff is recommending disapproval of this rezoning application as submitted.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher reminded the audience that no new case would be taken up after 11 p. m.
Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, represented the applicant, Rockford Homes. Mr. Cline said
they first met with Staff in November regarding this rezoning. In JaI~uary, Staff brought tile 15-
acre provision in the Code to his attention. Three zoning options then were examined, a PLR,
Planned Low Density Residential District with a variance; a PHR, Planned High Density
Residential District~ and PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Mr. Cline said the variance
~?i-"-l~ provision in any of the planned districts requires a written statement, and ~hat Council made the
final decision. Basically, it is a bunt-in variance provision. He asked for guidance on t)1e
zoning distri<. t.
Mr. Cline ~aid Rockford Homes had buiit half the homes in Heather Gle.". He said the
Southwest Area Plan indicated single-family, like Heather Glen, with a maximum of 4.13 dulac.
He said the roadway decisions had already been made. Nom Street connected at the top and at
the bottom. He said land uc;e, density, and roadways were already laid out for them.
Mr. Cline said the original plan filed had a cul-de-sac and one less lot, but Staff had asked them
to remove the cul-de-sac, stubbing the road into the property. He said this was not their initial
idea, and now Staff does not support the layout. They had no connection with Frank Woodin;
but in the future, the land may be developed as 8 or 9 units, with houses backing up t6 Wilcox
Road.
Retention was originally planned in the northeast corner of the property: the low point. There
is a 16-inch storm sewer that is also the natural drainage channel. Mr. Cline said the City
Engineer had expressed the des~re to have retention in the Heather Glen storm basin. Their
engineers indicated that it could possibly be done that way. Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
~,"'~
-,.'~'"' .
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
. Minutes - February 9, 1995
Page 17
Mr. Cline said no parkland would be planned on the site because there was already a lot of
parkland in the area and money in lieu of parkland was preferred. He said they were still
willing to do so. Then the historical issue arose. He said the historic marKer could either be
included as parkland or it would be tacked onto the adjacent property. It was up to the City.
Mr. Cline said the property owner did not own any dead bodies. They are in the public domain,
although the statutes require certain sensitivity to the rights of the next of kin. The Code places
a governmental responsibility on townships. He said they did ~ot warlt to be insensitive, but ....
they were willing to relocate the gravesite or put up a wrou~~t iron fence with a brass plaque.
Direction from the City is needed. They have never indicated this area as a parkland dedication. ......
Mr. Cline did not feel it was their job to plan others' land. The sketches are not intended to be
development plans. Nothing can be done with the Bee property because of the proposed road.
The most likely land use for that property would be multi-family. He said he had no authority
to speak for the Bees or Wilcox Road Associates. Single-family is unlikely. If developed at the
same time as the Woodin piece, with the same ownership, perhaps multi-family would be
appropriate.
Mr. Cline said the reason for the deep lots was for the detention area.
Mr. Ferrara said the basic issue was the PLR itself, and the fact that a IS-acre minimum is
required for rezoning. The parcel on its own does not work.
Mr. Cline said he had no control over it, and the ability to vary is built into the Code.
Mr. Ferrara said the lots were long and skinny. He preferred the cui de sac plan. Mr. Zawaly
and Mr. Peplow agreed.
Mr. Rubey said Mr. Cline's frrst design included the cul-de-sac design. At that tim~, Staff ....
wanted to assess the effect on surrounding properties. Staff asked the applicant for stub streets
for connections and caso to look at what alternatives were available for adjacent parcels. From -
Stafrs perspective, neither this site plan nor the cuI de sac plan provide a larger comprehensive
scheme for development with the future Woerner-Temnle extenslon. TIus site is part of a larger
15-acre piece of property being split. Staff needs to know that this will not render those
surrounding pieces of property unusable.
Mr. Ferrara said he was concerned that future homeowners will be surprised when multi-family
is built around it. He was uncomfortable with the idea.
,
Mr. Zawaly said if 5-acre subdivisions were developed throughout the City, it would be a mess.
Mr. Cline said the situation was caused when the City decided to put the roadway through the
property . Mr. Zawaly said when it is put together with other parcels, it makes sense. Mr.
Zawaly did not like the original cul-de-sac version although he felt it wa~ prefef"dble.
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
...
- .- -..-- - ----.------_._---_._~
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
. Minutes - February 9, 1995
Page 18
Mr. Cline requested that this application be tabled with direction given from the Commission.
Mr. Fishman said Mr. Zawaly and Mr. Ferrara had given direction. Neither :Mr. Zawaly nor
Mr. Fishman knew how tabling the case would help. Mr. Rubey said other zoning district
options are available.
Mr. Fishman said they did have the right to develop the land and larger lots would solve several
r"~ problems. Mr. Cline said he would work with Staff.
Ms. Clarke said the purpose statement 6n a PUD was counter to what this plan showed. A PUD
- is to "provide a permissive, voluntary, alternate zoning in subdivision planning procedure in
order to encourage imaginative architectural design, flexibility in building styles and types,
proper relationships between buildings and land, to permit the development of land in an
orderly, coordinated and comprehensive manner by preserving the natural quality and beauty of
the land and so to provide supporting community facilities in a development in diverse, sound
Urb3.1i environments consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture practices, and
engineering principles under the conditions of appro'led site and development plan." She said
given that statement, Staff could not endorse it.
Mr. Fishman suggested a lower density. He said that Heather Glen did not need to be replicated
in density.
Mr. Cline said his plan would be criticized if the lots were too big.
Mr. Fishman made a motion to disapprove this rezoni:1g application because the plan <!oes not
advance or conform to the city's thoroughfare plan for the area, the park as set aside does not
advance the City's open space goals, the use of planned districts is encouraged to foster
imaginative design and sensitivity to the ~nvironment, but neither goal is achieved, and
-- the layout may detract from development potential of surrounding sites.
Mr. Banchefsky ~':lid it had always been the Commission's policy to grant an applicant a tabling
1!ilk';..." when requested.
Mr. Zawaly said the point was well take.n and he seconded the motion. Passage of the motion
Vlould ~y the Commission did not want to see a similar plan.
Mr. Cline asked for tabling and said he did not know the real issues.
Mr. Fishman said they were not close to the 15 acres required, and they did not have Staffs
recommendation. He was willing to withdraw the motion if so advised.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said since Staff recommended disapproval, she assumed that Staff did
not want it to come back unless it was substantially different. Mr. Banchefsky said there was
nothing inappropriate with voting this application down.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, no; Mr. Peplow, no; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, no; Mr.
Fishman, no; and Mr. Zawaly, yes. (Motion to disapprove failed 1-4.)
Z96-006
Wilcox Estates
-
.
I ... "",'
it
~
o
"
g _._ l(
- I' ' ~ ~
,r ~ ~ .... on ::
... r", f/) <> g: ui~ :It
~ ~ r !! ~ r'-' ~ ~ -:~: a
_ u. ( ~.: ""'~"'_." ... ~~ ~ ~ I ~~
'---J-ll z " ~ o~~ u 0
- - ; 11..nfl.: ~::t: r;:". ;a 9 ~
, L..__.. '" t..J . ... u. 2
~ PI I ('.) ~.. _ ~ '0' ~ " ~-~
,- j~,_. ... ...... ~ r:
o ~ .'..' "'.'.';::'-11 U) ",. "0 '" S. ...8
In :, ,--- en ~ __ r.. ~ r UJ ~
,I "-<- ~ "'" :.:: ~. l:I:. all,.,
t- C'':::J ;.y..... ~ 0') tJ U 5l z c~
" '^-' - C) c! .. -,
. 0:: .... N';;i
~ I ~I I CO:;j . .d,
1 cS- 0-
I rd.C"l1 CE ....;; a: 3;
, . l-=:::.:; - . 0 1l ~
I i' ' <i .; fIl
,..,..,1 _,' '--> ~
"
.! ~:
( ~--"'q _ ~.., ........... ~ 1.
\
,
~
~
, i~
, ~~
~
- - - -
<<YON Xo::nlJl.
~
! ! ~
'. Gol
~
II:
~
! ~ I ! ~
~ 0 ~
~ N ~
~ ~
~ ~
= S ! ~ ~ l;
~ a ~
~ '" ~ '
. ~ ~
II) ~ ' to. ..
en..... ~ ~
I 1 ~ is Eat
", .. Ii!.t ~~I
i~~ ~~~
~~=
!
".",
. ., ~
. . ,l9'96t J .ll,lM:O S ~
, . ~
! '" 99' :1! ~ ..
00 .,. ~.Il
-;.; '" :::? i!ii
OJ ,.... ~=::
~ i;~:
99'
~,., ~u ~
to , :;J ~
~ ~g
:z:
ii [9 [9 192 99'
J~J
,.,
00
b ,.,
00 00
<Xi
~ ~ ~l
~ ~ ~ ~[J
w <>
. <> '"
. II) ....
. ~ r "" . ~l
i! .,. CJ 3~~\l'J
II) ~
z tJ.o ....
~ I E9 E9 % ~
on
.LV7N. [$: _ o~ ~
NlION ffi
~ [9 [9 [9 [9 ~2 6[
z-
~
...z
~o
2 UJ tD ,.., ..... 10 M ~~
N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~I
~
o!;j ! [9 [9 [9 [9 [9
. ,09T<;t M .It,9f.<;O N
ii!
:a
~ ~
Ii:
ii:
"/.1 .., 'nl' 'HI 4", .:1!.,"',J;
'~r 1/7.11' I pn .tI,ott AII.IA'
.. .UII If $tW~A IN. r Hd.UCtt
_ 2
I
I
"
~ . fII'wC ". ...... _"'. ..'.._ -
__'4..'''''''''' .......,.." ..' .... *"
1'i"~"',''''''''''';;<;~:''"!>.,.q:n ._11~'..~J!l~.:.::__'-'_'il!.'_.~-" "'-"'..,....'.~.~ -!'I,--.--,.,~--,,,,,.,._,,,,,~~~~~_~~#'""+ii'~""'""''';~~~~~~~~'''''''''''''''~.._~,;;",.~..._~.,,-.,-,- ,,,-.,,,,,,, <",",--;;,.,,,.,,,,...-~-,.".,...,.,,_., ",-'''':;.''''''.;--'', -"'""'--'--~ --,..,.:.,-~""",,",,,,,,.,,--,,~..,...,..*,,,....,__ .__.r _
~- -
- --- -
- -
- ...
- -- ~
-
- - - -~
- -
-- ---.-- -~'-
--......- -.p.-,. -
...
'T.
~c:
0---: --
.....c
o~
ztr.
~:>;::
~~ >
t-l~ <
rn I
>-< ~ I
'0
rn
~ III
'tl
~ :I:
;.-
~
t"'" <
0-1 III
t;j Z
C
rn
lC
III
III
r
I
I
I ~
~ f-' ....... ~
>-< Z
~ mtTJ
rn~
lTl Tl~@
z
~ o~
....... Zf2
r-<
n I w~
0
X
~
, I
-- ~
~ ill --
0
I '> n pc
I n ~ ..; !II
:I:
tT1 III
t--- Z tT1 El It> J
iTnT-- ill ;d8 r I
I Co I !II
-l , rn~ I
..;Z ~
~
n I E; z
I 11_ I rn
J'LJ I
I
-
-
----4 _
- WILCOX ROAD
-
-+
"I (
~
I
Fl (;
c
~
!!'
~
. c
~
(;
0
'"
0
(J 0
zO
~Z
~(J :5
~m
~ ~ ~ n
~Q8 Io---j
QZ ..
0
.,
8_ ~
FS~~ ~ Cllo---j 0
c Et:l", g~
m ~3:o.Jo "tl ~"'~ ~
n ..,'c~ of
~ -c::c::
'" ~~~c i og:-o ~ ~.
m 1 :J:Z~ .,f1 c:tDO
'" , 0
j i~~~ .. Z r-' ........
~""'?;:l
_ z.......
0 ~s
::r:
r"-'~'-< ~~~~~~~~:
:~J. ; ~o
~ ::::f
" ~. J:> ~c:
f'~,i C
101 G)
~~I ~ ~
I~I <D
=;5 l c.()
!v>. 0)
~ ~:~-,~~ ~
;- <: '-:.::;"~ Ii
[:<"'::',-;..&0.,
1,
!.~..._..,
F~~""" .....
...
~ ~"'y;J tW,_~w!t.mlfll. __, ... 11*
-.'.'..,..... ~..,,---:-,...:,.-'.-~:,'" ". ,,,".,., ""'*"'--';"'~.H>~
....- ,..".~
"-
-
;J~IU. .~!I!liIi~J':l!~~~'~~~"""'"-
;1
,.,_ _~ f/f""'- '. -,
Ii... - ... ..
iii
w~
~5~ ~
~ ~ ~~! j r~A ~ ~ ~
~ If -I~~ ;- ,1!\ ;. ---- ~ a..a ~:: ci
Z ..J. I'll ~;..._-- ..... ... .... .."
~ ~ ::~!~ ,- . : ~:; :t: 0 !f~. ''':'It
o \oJ -U UN . I"r." a ... tl '" ..~
~ t' ex ex lDZIIl 2' " :_~.. , ~ >-..- .- ~ ~ ...
!;! .. -w..J wo n, '" ... IIo:l "J ., ~ ~ ! ~
a ':+- 0 :c ~...~ ~= 'J t::-Cli ), IN" l>o: r... ~ g l::
II! t! ~ "-11... ~~ ~.c;.C-"_J.t (',; 1...1\ < ~ e; ~ 5.. ~ ~ .1 ~
.... ..Juz 1Il~ ! ; ..' .... 0 .... ~ Ill.. t ":C
i '2 ~ gl!lj :i.. ir.::.-=:l U:J \ ";;:)\' < l!l ~ fI) ~ 0: Q t- a e M1i ;;
~ <> ~ ._ 00 . '. ,. ... ~ f IlC Ii: 0: "lk
III ~ ~ ~~:. ~~ \""" I iI,!." 1 ~" , " .. co · ~ S'J ~
~ ~ '" N:>. ~_ ,""" ' ~ 0 .. >-.. II: C) IOl u 0: I!:l ..
o _ 0 D....~ ....~ - C':" t \;,...)\ ..J W a: ~ ~ . 0 ... .,,~ :
en 0 ~ =~I ~-J @::~' q, ! '" -; ~ ~ ~ ~ Il: ~ to II;;
Z W 0 ii!....w ow ,- P"J' ~",--"", rr 3; ~ ~." III" ...:l!:'" ~
~ > G.. j"'.... u.... ',-'" w ~ r"'I""" tl -
! _ l!;, 0 ~ ;:. j ".r...j , I~'""~ !i ~ ~ .... .. .... ~~'
E 0 0 K' i ~ !i Z i. "'I' : , .,..,. 1 i "- ..... lit .... ~ - ~ ~,
~ . ~ j j ~~~ ~~ '. _ _ ~'"'" ~ l.: ' ~ 0 ~ C) ~ ~ ~
~ .. .. .. ~"'o 00 ,"'---'V- 1 r. ~ ~ <.i ~
~I @;~~~~:;:"~:::~~&'..~,.~~_.,. ! ~ u ., ~
u.. ~ J
~
'^ U'I VI In U'I
WW W ww
Q: Q: Q: D:: 0::
~ ~ ~ u; ~':f l':f
.. "'F "';'" 1r "'.0 o.
z ~ _ _ . w - ~ 0
o _. . 2- .
SeD ~ -
..J
:>
U
..J
'"
U
w.. Vi
U.. ~
, .. \oJ 0
"- It: ...
~ Ill'" ..
____ z w ~ i
w...... ~
o --- l16 ~ U; ~ e
- ==:j _ / _".... o~ _ ~--- _ ~ 01.
( ~ --r'\.-f~~=5J/ '-:l aYtRI Xo:T1lM A I ~-
-1' 1>1-'-1 \ ~P( 00 YJ I ...
1)1 · lU(
I t ~ I .. .
~ ~': I ' IL1l
"ti1;j L--1 g
11~ 10 r! \ -
~ (~ I 11! 1~ ~: ~ B
I \ q I / ~ ~ ..-------.... ~ ~ - ----.J-ll- ~
~ ~ S <;: ~ ~
. r--lL II 1.\ ~.I:' .. ~J Ul
~ ! [- \ ~~! ~~ I !~~[ D
_ -.I ~ I[] --------- ,,~~"-! 1 / ~ \~ ~
. / ! ........... ~ hi'! III .
.T ~ &;, !j1;" .,'~)~ \ ~ .0 0
. "'"i~~a.-J . ~. r
......... If. .-,t. - -~_ .... -v
-<.. I ~ Id~-{ \~.) - ~~-~ ...J
~ ~. ,\ \ - ~ ~ j <') i ]NOl."....... ..I~.. if I Ie; /I GSI '\ J
" tl--'" "",,\\ 0 .:::" ~ .; _ ~ ~/ ?'~ v'!, 1-.
~~ '\ \ '\ ,\ \! ~~ >a S If I ~ ~ I ~
G \ \\ \ \\~ ~ ~ ~ II' I GGl ~T ~
15 !\,~ ~ U:;: , ;, ~
j!:" .J" -....
i . \1 ~ i ~ ~ l't ~ I 69 [9 '0' : L ~.~ !!~
-- l 1 l ) \0 ~. ~k'! /~/' .'" I' i -.: .'''7j A-. '" 11: r
\. I Y II?' ""--- J s j
\ I / ~. fi\ ... Bi!l II' ~ Gi!l
CD - Ie) ....
ir' ,- -< It IIllj
; I l n / :~~ ~ :~ ~ I ~ f~ I ~ ~~ V
I I I} LX ~ ' ~ ~l ~ 1J.. ~,~ at
/; 1 :'_ <~NV~O" l~ ~o [9 -~I....\ I~ L ~JL--____.J! (r 1 ~"
V "...0--.... \ \ ~o r) ~
.oau.~ I ~ ~ '
_ ~\. --- 'I " MlON ! - \- \ - ~ i. ~g /'
.. ~ I. ~~ r . <<-
;; ! /0 _' ---- ,IV i 69 [9 _~ [9 ~l~ 'II . -.... 6"';' if"'<<-$"
T- I (p '-". ," -"'r--.::- i ~ (" / ~-
r---.. . v" . . i' u.z
r------..... 1'-' ID ID ... ... ; l' il8
rf., '. f\ ~\ 3 . i ~,! MM ;lJPi :~ ....
1\ ~ I 0 .. rt ~ \ ~ ~ J ~ ~;it M ..
, ! I 1\ ti '(; 69 [9 -, E9 E9 . i'J, / F"lil...]:/ . ---...
1, ~.~~ ~ D il~~ / ~.\~ ' ~~~ ~
~., \ __________ "oS' ,
--~ ~ : ~
.. ~.. a! ~
;:l~", ~ II; , , ~ I)...
5 .. ~ oa .... ..". "" % 0111 rI.... Y'O ~
; III I ~ c -
_ ._ I --... III
.. -... 0 I 5
" qv ; ~ ~
" " I -f! ~ V ". ~
~ I ~ i i II "" ~ .-
'" :- - '1 :, il i 1.\1 -"'-- ~ --
I ) I J --Ii-=-;- I f7
....._____ \" ~\ I .
,
,'......
.
",.., "'^.... ,........-""""" -.
~ -- """,,-,,--- ...
,...~~~,4"'<''''', .l!'! ~ ~.F .. .. .~.,...~,.,....,';r'....'-,."_'''' " F'.', ~'. .-,'.. .-'-"".""'.'C'j<-.,'._"",,,-' ,..c"",-."'",,,");\.~~_,)l~j _.) L ',' ~l ". ~~~~.,..""~'"" .-- ..,-.."""_..",,,;,..._,,~~'i!'i'~-+~, ,", .. .... 'f...~" T. "".'1"~~"""'''w." " ,,. ....-...,. ,,- _.,'_..>".";'"......-~..",,:"',"'"_""'.:i""'._"'""~,,.,.,,",......!"........'.'I"f_.1l