038-90 Ordinance
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Day10n Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No. nmJ~__~(L... Passed nm.. Un' . nnmnnm.nnmn19n
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT THE
LOWEST/BEST BID FOR THE
FRANTZ ROAD/DUBLIN ROAD
GATEWAY PROJECT, AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT FOR SAID PROJECT
WHEREAS, after advertising, receiving bids and opening said bids on
Tuesday, April 10, 1990 for the Frantz Road/Dublin Road Gateway Project;
and
WHEREAS, Council has determined that the lowest and best bid for said
project is from Riepenhoff Landscape Inc. in the amount of $23,626.00;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
State of Ohio, 7 of the elected members concurring:
-
Section 1. That the bid from Riepenhoff Landscape, Inc. in the amount
of $23,626.00 be, and hereby is, accepted.
Section 2. That the City Manager be, and hereby is, authorized and
directed to execute a contract with Riepenhoff landscape, Inc. for
above mentioned project.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from
the earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this 7th day of May , 1990.
-
~e,1J;d
Attest:
'~x?~~
Clerk of oun il
I hereby certify that cop1es of th:s Od'nonce/lb~!rrrPlI1 were posteo; th'
City of Dublin in occordO:1ce w;th Secfon 731 25 of tIle f\l,jo R . d' c"d e
, . . .1,.. eVlse 0 e.
/l
-/~ ~. ?(~
Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
..... ..
~
. .
MEMORANDUM
To: Members of Council
From: patrik Bowman, Planning Director
Subject: Frantz Rd./Dublin Rd. Gateway Project
Date: April 12, 1990
On April 10, 1990, bids were opened for the Frantz Rd./Dublin Rd. Gateway
Landscaping Project. The low bid was $23,626.00 from Riepenhoff Landscape,
Inc. This bid is approximately $3,000 less than the landscape planner's
estimate.
Riepenhoff Landscape, Inc. has extensive experience in both residential and
commercial developments. The subcontractor, Lintner and Luft stone masons,
also have extensive experience. Examples of their work include the stone
walls at Llewellyn Farms Park and Chamber's Gateway.
There were two issues regarding the low bid and they have been resolved.
Specifically, the bid forms were submitted loose leaf and not in the book
form. All the required forms were submitted and legal counsel does not feel
this is a substantive error. Secondly, there were two different bid amounts.
One amount was listed on the bid schedule and another amount was listed on the
proposal form. The reason for the discrepancy is that the person preparing
the bid included the cost of obtaining the bond on the proposal form and he
did not include it on the bid schedule.
Legal counsel feels that these two issues are not substantive and that the bid
can be awarded to the lowest and best bidder, Riepenhoff Landscape for
$23,626.00. Because the bid is valid for 60 days, I am respectfully
requesting that Council, at minimum, adopt emergency legislation at anyone of
the three reading dates.
PB:jk
1 I I I
I I I I I II
. I I I I
I
- I I
I I I _\
;1 9 aI ~~I \ I
',~ Zw
-~ ~~ :;;0: I
- _r\ t- u.. I
~ \"~ ~ .J -
eD~Q < I I I I
..J'~ I I
~~(\j.C _
en ~\* ~t -:t, ,~
N ~ l i
W~ I- I "4. ~ 0
a: ~ < w el()~O~ ~
,,~ :;; I- ... . (Il. . ,
G........ - <( :::"...:'", I
- I- C <,J 0 M I I
Z~ III ..3 t/',nJ I
- :;; ~ Cl _ '.. "
Z <( z ~ 'J' lr"l Q I I I .;...
Z III - 'u . N'f IV) I
LLJ ~ ~ I
C. I- a: W t_
O ILl Q. I ~~ ~
I ~ ~ 0 ~ 2 .~ -0' Ii ~~
....J 0 <(!:! ;; ti}.r ~\; ~ I
- a: ..J III ;;; < -: -: ~?~.Il!
m c. c. " _ ~... :>"'), .. 'I'
:E t-- a.: '"'IS ~ Is\\: g g.
~ 0: ~ <( ~o ~ _
< ~ I' ~, Ivt ~ ~ ~
U :: \\i(,; l3 9~ 0
en < y. 'lSl).. ~~
C
Z "'"
~ :;;..) I
00 2
It- e _
CD u.. \U
~ t- t[~ A.. b--r
~ ~ ~5 Q[~ e~ I I I -J
o :I: !'" \IJ)g ~'" I I
.... i Ill.~ ~~ ~~ I I I I I
I ~S IN.JJ\I 21
--
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Patrik G. Bowman, Planning Director
Subject: Frantz Rd./Dublin Road Gateway
Ordinance No. 38-90
Date: May 2, 1990
Staff is requesting that this ordinance be passed as emergency legislation at
the second reading scheduled for May 7, 1990. At this time of the year, it is
getting more difficult to obtain plant material. Passing the ordinance as an
emergency will help to keep the number of plant material substitutions to a
minimum.
Staff has investigated different methods for lighting the Dublin Road and Old
Dublin Road intersection and is recommending that two street lights be
installed. One is to be located directly at the intersection and the other is
to be located approximately 120 feet southwest of the intersection along
Dublin Road. This second fixture will help to accentuate the curve of the
road and enable motorists better clear sight distance. Utilizing the KIM
light fixture, the intersection will be lit while controlling off-site glare
at the same time. The preliminary estimate for this lighting project is
approximately $9,000.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of Dublin City Council
FROM: Timothy C. Hansley, City Manager
SUBJECT: Attached Ordinance No. 37-90
DATE: April 11, 1990
BY: David L. Harding, Director of Personnel & Purchasing
Attached for your consideration please find Ordinance No. 37-90
amending Sections 7 and 15 of Ordinance No. 17-90 ("Compensation
Plan"). Staff believes that these amendments are necessary to clarify
a previous amendment to Section 7 of said Ordinance regarding vacation
accrual and usage for new employees of the City and to also clean-up
some other language within Section 7 impacted by said amendment which
could be interpreted as contradictory or inconsistent with the intent
of said amendment. (To assist in following the aforementioned amend-
ments, I have enclosed the applicable pages of Ordinance No. 17-90 and
have highlighted the effected areas in both Ordinance No. 17-90 and
Ordinance No. 37-90.)
The concern of Staff is specific to Sections 7A. (2nd paragraph), 7B,
7C, and 15, of Ordinance No. 17-90. Section 7A. (2nd paragraph) of
Ordinance No. 17-90 has been re-drafted to clarify its intent and has
been re-assigned to Sections 7C. and 7D. under the amendment to
Section 7 contained in Ordinance 37-90. Section 7B. of Ordinance
17-90 has been re-drafted to eliminate any possible contraction or
inconsistency in interpretation relative to the intent of new sections
7C. and 7D. under Ordinance No. 37-90 and remains as Section 7B. under
the amendment to Section 7 contained in Ordinance No. 37-90. Section
7C. of Ordinance No. 17-90 has been re-drafted and now appears as
Section 7E. under the amendment to Section 7 contained in Ordinance
No. 37-90. (In addition, please note that sections 7D. through 7I. of
Ordinance No. 17-90 now appear as Sections 7F. through 7K. under the
amendment to Section 7 contained in Ordinance No. 37-90, however, they
contain the same verbiage as that contained in Ordinance 17-90.)
Section 15 of Ordinance No. 17-90 has been re-drafted to add Sections
7C, and 7D, in order to be consistent with the language in both of
those Sections exempting them from retroactivity to January 1, 1990.
Section 15 of Ordinance No. 17-90 remains Section 15 under the amend-
ment to Section 15 contained in Ordinance No. 37-90.
DLH/mc