033-90 Ordinance
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No, 30043
Ordinance No .__:33-:-:<)()__m Passed.__. un_ n____.. ___._19.. __
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A
CHANGE OF ZONING ON A 38.368
ACRE TRACT LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF WILCOX ROAD APPROXI-
MATELY 900 FEET NORTH OF
TUTTLE ROAD. TO BE REZONED
FROM: R-1A, RESTRICTED SUB-
URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(current Washington Town-
ship zoning) TO: R-12,
URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
State of Ohio, 6 of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached
legal description marked Exhibit "A"), situated in the City of Dublin,
State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to R-12, URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,
and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in
Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances),
the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of
contiguous property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning
and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated in to and
made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be
developed and used in accordance therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from
and after the earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this 6th day of August , 1990.
Officer
/, Frances M. Urban .
. . Clerk of (ound. hereby certii'i that the
I Attest: foregomg ,s a true copy of Ord;noi1ce/~~ No. 33-90
duly adop.ted by the Cound of fhe Ci~ of Dub!:n, Ohio on the 6th
day of August 19 0 '
, .
~>>;.t{~ f;vCh-ao ~. W~
lerk of Council Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
I hereby certify that copies of this Ord;nance/Rmllftleft were posted i the
Sponsor: Planning Department City of Dublin in accordance with Sedion 731.25 of the Ohio Revised C de~,
-
J~~.~
, Clerk of Ceundl, Dublin, Ohio, . . . .. ..'~." ,..J.,.
. ~
CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No:
DISTRICT MAP ZM :Z90-co3
(Reclassification of Land) Date Filed: ~/d. ~/qO
Fee Receipt No: I
Received by: Itl Ii(; t-4/
Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary
TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Applicant F.A. Kohler Co.
(' (~ave property in contract)
In contract
being the owner(s)~/lessee(s) of property located within the area proposed for
future development in the UR category , requests that the following
described land to be placed in the Urban Residential District (Chapter 1157)
.
A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following):
a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of
,
a recorded plat, with an area of .
b. Beginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW
direction from the (specify) of
(Street or other), and thence having a dimension
of from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
.
c. The tract of land containing 38.368 Acres and bounded by:
Wilcox Road (specify) on the ~ W (Circle)
Duke 70 Ltd tract (specify) on the ~ EXWX(Circle)
Barney tract (specify) on the N sxgxw (Circle)
mise Tuttle Road lots (specify) on the R S RxK (Circle)
d. Attached legal description: YES x NO
Page 1 of 3
FEB r,
, " ,
,
Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of
not less than 8~ x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be
identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map
shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500)
feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and
other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be
fully dimensioned.
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
boundaries.
List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
-
see attached list of property owners
B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND
1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: multifamily development project
at a density of 12 units per acre in UR category. .
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of
three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2)
copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful
to the review of this application.
Plans and Exhibits submitted
Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan ; Sketch ;
- - - -
Photographs -- ; Other (specify)
2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing
and probably future land use character of the vicinity.
This tract is identified as R-12 on the preliminary plan for the area pre-
.I-JdI eLl l>y Lhe ci Ly . TIle uffice Llevelu.I-JllleIlL of Lhe TulLle Crossings InterchangE
has created a present need for quality multifamily in the area. Further,
Lhi::; cdLeyuI y will .I-JI uviJe d LI'dlJ.::;i Lion Lu slIlyle fdHtily dredS deslgndted
for development to the northwest. The land use is sensible and developable
dL Lbe .I-JI e::;eIlL Lillle. A.I-J.I-JlicdllL will .I-JI'uviJe uLili Lie::; Lo Lhe ::;1 Le.
Page 2 of 3 pages
-
3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City
Council within the last two (2) years?
YES
NO x
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration
C. AFFIDAVIT
Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is
recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to
insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property:
Myron Porter, Rita Porter, Ursula Maddox
APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
I hocl Christopher T. Cline the attomey for the applicant
being duly sworn, depose and sa* .']tt.at loh~ o.
duly sworn, depose and say that
in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached,
and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/our ability present
the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and.that the statements
and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the
best of my/our knowledge and belief.
~~~
( ig atj.e)
Christopher T. Cline
Attomey for F .A. Kohler Co., applicant
37 West Bridge Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
(Mailing address)
614-766-0425
(Phone)
,~ ~'?.- ~
Subscribed and sworn to before me this:1{p ~ day of b~ , 19)Jo~
v ~ ~ '
/:; " ,'" (
THOMAS G. CLINE ( ,/ ,,' ,'~ / ,~~-<-
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF OHIO \.,/ , ( , b l. )
MY COIIIIISSlOII EXI'IRfS AUGUST 30.1992 notary Pu l.C
Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory:
Christopher T. Cline
(Name (Address) (Telephone)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not write below this-line)- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn Held to
(Date) (Date)
2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
3. City Council: Date of Hearing
Approved Disapproved Modified
- - --
, '1'
, ,,'., ,...--""'__.,;....u~., h .'- .~.-... , ."'~ ....,-
d'(
J :
.
dwards Companies
11 CHATIlAM LANE ;
JLUMBUS. OHIO 43221
14/459-1604
;
January 25, 1990
Mr. Christopher T. Cline
Attorney-at-Law
37 Bridge street
Dublin, OH 43017
-
Dear Chris:
RE: REVIEW OF MASTER ~ MEETING. JiONDAY. JAN. 2.h 1990
Although we discussed many topics during this meeting, I
thought the three most important items should be summarized
as follows:
A. PORTER AND HADDOX PROPERTIES TOTALING APPROX. 36 ACRES
1. I agree to accept an R-12 zoning on this property.
2. I will be willing to contribute $100,000 towards
land cost to buy additional acreage next to a
proposed park in Washington Township.
3. I will donate to Dublin a 30 foot right-of-way down
most of the north property line for a rerouting of
the future wilcox Road. The remaining acreage will
then have a density credit for this right-of-way.
4. The road will be approximately as shown on Jim
Houk's preliminary drawings. This road will be
further defined on the rough master plan Jim
Houk is to have ready for you tomorrow.
5. Neither I nor the people to whom I sell the ground
to build the apartments will be required to pay for
the engineering or construction costs of this road.
-continued-
Acme Sliding Door. Inc. . Cardinal Steel Erectors. Inc. . Distinctive Properties. Inc. · Edwards Insulation Company · The J.T. Edwards
Company . The Edwards Land Company . The Edwards Realty Company · Dave Edwards Steel Company · Golden Bear Erectors ·
lcelandia. Inc. . F.A. Kohler. Multicon Communities. Inc. (Duffy Homes) · Multicon Development Co. · Pennsylvania &: West Virginia
~l1nnlv r:nrnQre.tion . The Ross-Willoughby Company
..
.
~ Christop.:er Cline
Hr.
Page 2 I
.
,
.
B. WINDMILLER TRACT
1- I believe I can get Allen Shepherd to accept the
following zoning: '
- 20 acres of "Planned Town Center"
- 22 acres of R-12
- 8 acres of R-3 (sir.gle family).
2. H~ will be willing to contribute Sl50,000 towards
land cost to buy additional acreaae ney.~ to a
proposec park in Washington Township.
3 . He will donate to Dublin a 60 foot right-of-way for
the straighter.ing out of Wilcox Road, as shown on
Jim Houk's rough sketch.
~ . The engineering and construction costs of wilcox
Road will be the responsibility of either the
county or Dublin.
5. He will donate to Dublin an 80 foot right-of-way
for the extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard.
6. The engineering and construction costs of the
extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard will be
the responsibility of the developer.
Please call me, if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Peter H. Edwards
PHE:rae
cc: Mr. Tim Hansley - City of Dublin
Mr. Pat Bowman - city of Dublin
Mr. steve Smith - Dublin City Attorney
Mr. Allen Shepherd - Shepherd Excavating
Mr. Jim Houk - Bohm NBBJ
Mr. Harrison Smith - Smith & Hale
" ~ ~', .' ,"
-3-
is assured of a density credit based on 12 units per acre for the
land dedicated. It was understood that neither he nor his
successors would be responsible for the construction cost of the
new road.
Windmiller Property "e"
1) Special Commercial, R-12 and R-3. "Special Commercial" is not an
existing district, and this was meant to delineate a neighborhood
center with specially coordinated characteristics; R-12 was
expected to carry a similar "quality development" commitment.
Since the Proposed Southwest Area Plan was circulated, the
multi-family piece between old Wilcox and new Wilcox Roads has been
reclassified in house as an office site after meeting with the
neighboring property owners.
2) The applicant was willing to contribute $150,000 in lieu of the
standard park dedication for the R-12 portion of the site.
3) The applicant would provide the necessary right-of-way (60') for
the realignment of Wilcox Road. This project was supposed to have
been done last year (by the County) but the alignment was changed.
Staff contact with the Franklin County Engineer's office indicated
their intention to "work with Dublin" and fund the project in the
same amount. Both sides agreed the new alignment might cost
slightly more, and Dublin Staff expected the City to cover this
shortfall. It was not expected that the developer would be
responsible for this improvement.
4) The applicant would provide the right-of-way and construct the
extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard through his site. The plan
shows the Tuttle Crossing Boulevard right-of-way as 80-100 feet.
Because the traffic circulation system proposed was not critically
reviewed by a professional traffic engineer, there was no further
discussion on exact width of right-of-way or pavement width.
Staff believes that the information contained in the letter dated
January 25, 1990 from Peter Edwards to Chris Cline substantially
reflects most of the understanding. As the road alignments proposed
have neither been subjected to full traffic and safety analysis nor
public hearing, they must continue to be considered as conceptual. In
terms of timing and construction, only the Wilcox Road straightening
project was expected to happen in the upcoming year, and there were no
other explicit discussions.
It should also be remembered that the road network was designed to serve
the uses proposed. The Wilcox-Rings Connector, for example, was
intended to provide incentive for residential growth by providing
separation between the single-family residential land and more intense
uses. If, as it now appears possible, the single-family use can be
achieved without it, this revision should be considered.
I, ," 1f .i'lt"',',MlIIo.',~. I', ~-.. ..' .,,' , .~ ,., '" f, .' .~ ',-',. . ''- ~
.'- .~
-
J ~~, 1ljJv r:?--
6lNSLE
ftt4q
P-A~ 'B(
. _ J;;;
. .. --
.
'.
MHJa:iJ. . . ~
-- .-. ~~
- - .;
~I ....
NUCJ1 \':"-~~ ..-
I(...~c;, ..
, ...
~ . ~tL1 \aTr5
.
- , , .
. '. \-:
_. .
,_.
.. .. .. [
. .
. . .. 0
.
. .
~
-
,"
!;~~.~ .l""::-,~ .~. _'.:.:~,: ~,:,..~:...-:
,-y:.~
r~N -
.~ '
.:~.:~ . . , ..;.
!'to ~~i:t~ .~"". ... . ,~.~ .. ..-. ~.: .-.......- ..
"
~ ,~~~. .. . . ' - '.~'.. ,"::.: ... ,.' ..-:.:-:
'" --.
~
f1"""'~""".. .
.-..- .. - .... -.. . .. -" ...--' ---- .-_..'" .
h, ..._ ._.......
.
.
". .--- ~ -- _.....:.- -..---.'--~ -- - ..._._---~- -;..--.
...-' . .... . . .-
--.." .. ~
---... -
J -
~l~ ~\~'i
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin qity Council Meeting Meeting
_~.==:. '---liA,mlllJ91f."r;l.B~J~~lmJr-----:--- ---.-----.----
HeIr! February 5, 1990
19
..- --_.....--- _n -- . -------- .- -" -..---
,n _________. ------.-._-- -'- --
Page Eight
It was also noted that each pole has a backup battery system for activa-
tion of the sirens should no electricity be available. "
,
There will be a second reading of the Ordinance on March 12, 1990.
Ordinance No. 14-90 _ Ordinance Authorizing Certain Items of Compensation
Relative to Appointment of Director of Development. First Reading.
Mr. Strip introduced the Ordinance.
Mr. "arding noted that the Ordinance seeks authorization for three items
of compensation relative to. the appointment of a new Director of
Development - a temporary housing allowance in the amount of $500/month
for a duration of three months which may be extended subject to the
approval of Council; a moving allowance equal to one month's salary; and
a vehicle Ullowance of $300/month.
Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an
emergency.
Mr. Campbell seconded the motion.
Vote - Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer,
yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen,
yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose,
yes.
Mr. "arding formally announced the appointment of Mr. Terry Foegler as
the new Director of Development and said that Mr. Foegler will begin !.
work with the City of Dublin on February 20, 1990. i
. '
,
Resolution No. 09-90 _ Resolution Adopting a Land Use Plan for an Area
in the Vicinity of the Tuttle Road Crossing Interchange.
Mr. Smith suggested, rather than a Resolution, that Council pass a
motion to give the intended land use to the property so that the applicant
can go ~head and start their zoning changes.
Mr. Amorose moved as follows:
"I hereby move the approval of the adoption of the land use
plan for an area in the vicinity of the Tuttle Crossing inter-
change with the following specific sections:
1- That the land use map entitled "City of Dublin, Southwest
Area Plan", dated January 29, 1990 is hereby adopted as the
land use and roadway plan for an area now within the City
and in unincorporated areas expected to be annexed to the
City.
2. That it is the intention of this Council to encourage rezonings
in accord with the adopted plan.
3. That all rezoning applications for property associated with
the development of Tuttle Crossing interchange and Development
Plan be hereby accepted for processing upon the approval
of the annexation request by the Franklin County Commissionersi
4. That it is the intention of this Council to adjust the open
I space dedication for all residential developments associated
<..- . with the development of the Tuttle Crossing interchange in
favor of an open space fee to be established at the time of
the rezoning.
5. That this motion be effective forthwith as it is necessary for
the orderly growth of the municipality and promoting the
general health, safety and welfare of its residents.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
'; " 't_., .,...' ~"'i'~' .,~'''''';-j!'~' "
,'0. ..., ~ ..,.......~..... .... ,.' '" .....~ .., ."... .... .'" '.. ... .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin C~ty Council Meeting Meeting
.~,,-_~~-:,,=-:-,-=i~iJmItG!il;~~32.. 'OHM NO. Il5T1n --'- -_.--- --.----.-
.----.-..-.-----
Held Februarv 5, 1990 19
. -.- -- -...-.-.' . -..-.---------- ----------.-.-----.-- ... -' ---. --" . _~_._... __.... _ __..un ~ -
-. -..---.--.---.--.--.------.---..-.- ..--..- ----- .. ___. _u _____.._. ...-
Page Nine
I
, ' ," '~
Mr. Bowman reported that there are specific designations which he would I
like Council to consider, and that there are general designations
,
where staff did not work closely with the property owners, but that t'
staff has subsequently been in contact with some of them and there are
concerns. In going over the plan briefly, Mr. Bowman noted that the plan
is a refinement of other plans that have been seen for the area; that this
is a refinement of the one that was passed and which was published as
part of the merger document.
He noted that the plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan in
that there is a transitional. belt around the outerbelt, around 270, with
the heavier uses and then moving out to more residential uses.
'Mr. Bowman said that the key aspect to the plan is a roadway network
which separates the different land uses in the plan. The most fragile
land use in,l the quadrant is the single family residential which is
currently under construction.
The roadway system, in order to keep the single family insulated, would
cut off Wilcox Road and make it a single family collector street and I
I also will try to discourage through traffic on Rings Road. i
He said that he had met with those persons involved with specific pieces
for which there will be specific zoning requests, namely the multi-family
zoning just north of Tuttle Road extended and east of Wilcox, etc.
" Bowman reported that the roadway network will also, in a sense,
I Mr.
relocate Wilcox Road to preserve the single family to the north, thus
separating it from the multi-family and office uses to the south.
Mr. Bowman referred to a designation called special commercial, noting
that staff will be making a study to come up with some kind of standard
for the special commercial - it being more of a town center, a smaller,
neighborhood-type commercial district.
Mr. Bowman said that he felt that the key to the map at present for the
purpose of the annexation was the properties that have specific zoning
districts attached to them _ three R-12 parcels and one SO parcel.
He said that he would like some indication from Council that that is
the direction in which Council wants to move on those properties,
direction on adjustment of the open space requirement. He noted also
that those are the properties that were also suggested could apply for .
zoning immediately following the approval of the annexation by the
Franklin County Commissioners.
Mr. Campbell requested that the specific parcels be identifed for the
~ "1 record.
Mrs. King said that this is a comprehensive issue that deserves
thorough discussion.
At the suggestion of Mr. Smith who noted that there has been considerable
threatened litigation, Mr. Sutphen moved to adjourn to executive session.
Mrs. King seconded the motion.
Mr. Sutphen withdrew his motion to adjourn to executive session until
the remainder of the business of Council had been completed.
Request for Ded Tax Funds - Dublin Historical Society.
.
Mr. David Hartman, former president of the Dublin Historical society,
and Mr. Jack Walters, architect, were present to answer questions, etc.
Mr. Strip reported that Mr. Hartman had met with the Finance Committee
(Ms. Maurer and Mr. Strip) and had given them a tour of the Coffman
Homestead.
He noted that he had reservations about allocating $80,000 of bed tax
funds for the various projects as requested, but said that he would
support the installation of heating and air conditioning at an approxi-
mate cost of $17,000.00, as well as an additional $2500 to begin :
purchasing an available period stove.
i
., "'f"; ',',;
JUL-31-90 rUE 16:52 C In OF DUBLI N FAX HO. 614889014U P.Ol
: ,
.,";:,1 '.,'
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~ ','
l' '
I,
Mlnulcs of Dublin Ciry Council Meeting ,Mel!,~I.ng " j
" .,. ! '
~ ',"
:::::=-----'...-f;:;r.i!"!'1rG\.:i~~2...I"lfI.r'~Q,::'lr1O"- -, -- ,,'._, ---- ..~~ .,.'.'
-.....-..--- -.-
j Held FebruHY 5, 1990 ! 19_
............... ..._~ --.--'-
~ .,,-:":-=.._..__.....::-l~-=- ~.~-_. .-',- ==~ - ~.-===,,--,.- -""~~ - --- ..-= -- ,,-~.,. .
Page twelve
, The illcon~istency nnd difference of the driveway approaches on tho
I ~tr~et was also nuted, nnd it wa~ also mentioned that some of the driv~- "
! WAY approaches hnd sidewalks ndd~d to them, some do not.
Mr. Sutphen commented that he thought sidewalks should have bHn ,
required and thut he felt that the City should pay for them. ~
It was noted that had sidewalks been bullt at the time of construction of
the homes that the cost of that construction would have boen added in
some manner to the purchase price of the home.
Mr. Hnn91~y mentioned thut enother process hBd been suSgested - the City
doing the engineering, providing ~pecifications, and giving everyone
o cCl'tain period of time in which to have their sidewalk built. H at
the end of thllt tim.a a homeowner had not had the sidewalk built, thlln
the City could h>lve thnt !lecti.on put ill, the cost being assessed b~ck
to the property cwner.
It was determined that at un ~pproximat' cost of $4/1ine31 foot that
the hCll1leowner would be assessed opproximately $30/ye3r.
Hr. ^morose sold that he did not feel that the City could start a policy
of providing sidewalks.
Hr. Hansley soid thot Rraff would prepore some rough engineering, and
get some quotas from a couple of contractorS, and meet with th~
l'esidents to gi\'en thorn the in(ormlltion And determille an equitable
solution .15 l'cgl1l'ds thl! sidewtllks in this area.
i
Mr. Campbell moved to allow 15 minutes on the Council agenda, after
corresp':mdece, before the commencement of the regular agl.!nda for comments
from citi~ens, the time to be divided 81nOug thos" signing up to speak,
the ti10EI allotted being 1S mInutes. This procedure will be tried [or
tloree months, after wh teh t im~ Council will rev iew the procedure to
determine if it should be continued.
Hr. Sutphon seconded the motion.
\ Vote Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; HI'S. King, yesl (but I'd l'other
it b~ holt an hour); Ms. Maurer, ye!; (hale hour)l Mayor Rozanski, yes;
Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen. yes.
, Vut~ on Mt. Sutphen's motion to adjourn te executive session, followed
; by Mrs. KJ.ng's seconu "as os followsl
Mayor Rozanski, yesj Hrs. Kil1g, >'esl Mr. ^moroSQ, yesl ~lr. Sutphen, yesj
Mr. Strip, YQSI Ms. M~urer, yes; Mr. Cnmpbell, yes.
Polloving Council's return to tloe regular meoting Mr. Amorosa withdrew
his Inot i.on regarding the land u~e plan for the lIrell in the vicinity
of the Tuttle Road Crossing Interchange - (Pa~o 8 of these minutes.)
Mr. Cnmphell oloved that 8 Statement of Intention of the Dublin City
Council is as tollowSI
1 . That the Lnnd Use Hap entitled "City of Dublin, Southwest Arell Plan"
dot~d January 29, 1990 is hereby adopted as the lond use and road-
way plAn for all area nuw within the City and in l,"in,~orporatl!d
areas expecteu to be annexed to the city. It i~ the expectation
of Council that staff \~111 meet with developers to reUne the plan.
2. Thl'lt it l.s the intention of this Council to ell<~OUrD~C rezonings
in accord with the adopted plan for ~pecific propertl~s.
3. That all rezoning applications for property associated with the
development of Tuttle Crossing Interchange and Development Plan
are hereby oec,~pted fer processing upon the IlPproval of the allllel<ll-
tion requ"st by the Prlinklin County Commissioners.
4. ThDt it is the inLel1tioro oE this Council to adjust thl'! open space
dedlcutlon for resldantial developments dcsignl.ltad in Exhibit A
D~sociated wlth the development of the Tuttle Crossing Interchange il
fovor of an open space fee to be established at the tim~ of rezoning
.\. JUL-31-90 rUE 16:53 CITY or DUBLIN F AX NO. 6148890740 P. U2
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.i\linutes or Dublin City Council Meeting MCCltlng
:=::::::--=~=::-=J~/.t ~i..' !L!~n::.:.r.r;~~:a1-' :..::..::=:==:=....-::.:::.-..::-__.______M -,.....~-
I ~~......- .-
j Heh:L_"r.:,~:..':.A~~~~.~:_O__ - "
...._.._,__,______19___.,
"l.....-".-:-~===:!.~~.~ '.'--- ....~. -~~~ - --- ::-:-=--.. '..-.- ...--.- ..._~==--_. -..........,. -~
,.; .
P..g~ 'rhitl'lt!n
Hr. Sutphen seconded the moticn.
Vote _ Mr. Campbell, yes; Mt'. Sutphen, ye~; Its. M(lur~r, YOGI Ml', ....rnorose,
I yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Roznnski, yesl Mr. Strip, ye5,
Commcnte f~om Staff
Mr. Ha~dlng thnnked the following persQn~ who 5erved on the Police
Ellnminlng B08l'd, Interv iew i ng 46 cllnd idates withi n thue days.
Ill'. Willard Chamber~, Pa~tot' Tert'Y Hofecker, Nun Metz, Sgt.
Bob Roederer, Officer HAndy Wilson ~nd Officer John Kreuz.
Mr. Willis
1. Reported thtit stafr ha$ been given the location of some of the Inflo
and ttHlt staff is in the process of verifying that information and
Ilorlfylng those homC!owllers affected, of the appropriate action that
needs to b~ tal:en.
Staff ha~ also identified and are verifying 10c~tionS of defective
manholes.
Several Council lIIelllber~ .Iore concerned that nlore substantial
amounts of inflow of storm wuter into the ~allitary sewer system
h~ve not been found, cubstantial enough amount5 to cause the
tYFe~ of spills that have occurred Bt the Itft station.
M:JY()l' ~ozan~ki said that he could not imagine 8 few dowllspouts or ;
perimeter drallls on houseg solving the Clty'6 inflow proLlems.
Mr. Willis s:Jid that no big nource has been found.
Nr, Call1pb~ll and Mr. Sutphen $1J88~sLed that shopping center parkillg
lot~ and cen,pany parking tots be checked; that there must be
something being overlooked.
2. Rcportad that the County has verbally agrced to authorize Dublin to I
use $215,000 of county license plate money for use on tho Muirfield
Drlvl! conllection, the sOGtlon running from Brand Road south to
Sells Middle School area.
Mr. McDaniel
I. The request for proposals regarding public relations' assistance
for the bond issues were mailed out approximately two weeks ago
to 15 Centrnl Ohio firms.
The proposnls returned will be ~valunted nnd ~ report mnde to
Council i" th~ near future.
Ms. Jordon
1- ^sk~d members of Coune! 1 to look (,ver t.he packet of material 011
the propo$~d regional lee rink and said that she would be
available to answer questions.
COIJIlc1 l Roundtable DiscussIon
"
Hr. Sutphan :'
1- Reported thnt many orca businesses, o(flc~s hllve T1\)t complied with
tha Ordinance which requires them to have upright. standing
handicDl'ped pnrking sIgns liS ".ell liS being required to have the
EMle sign painted on the parking $paces,
It was agreed that the Ordinance needs to be enforced.
"
"
MEMORANDUM
To: Council
From: Tim Hansley
Subject: Commitments in SW Dublin
Date: August 2, 1990
Initiated by: Bobbie Clarke, Patrik Bowman, Steve Smith, Mitch
Banchefsky, Terry Foegler, Janet Jordan
This is intended as a synopsis of the background and agreements, as
recalled and/or recorded by the various City staff members, surrounding
the 500-acre annexation from Washington Township to the southwest
quadrant of Dublin. Most of the pertinent discussions regarding City
II commitments II took place in open Council meetings or executive sessions,
with follow-up meetings with the City Manager, Law Director, or various
members of the Staff and with countless phone calls among the annexation
agent and petitioners, other land owners, Mr. Edwards and his partners,
several interested lawyers, potential developers, Council and Staff.
While they were tumultuous days between the November election and the
February Franklin County Commissioner's meeting, Staff believes the
following represents the major part of the agreement made.
Mr. Edwards had control of several parcels in the southwest area, one of
which had enormous revenue-producing potential along 1-270 (the Smith
property-"A"). He was interested in developing high-rise offices on it
and obtaining zoning (for later sale to other developers) on two other
sites (Porter/Maddox-"B" and Windmiller-"C"). Mr. Edwards was
interested in annexation to Dublin if, and only if, he was reasonably
assured that he would be able to develop the properties in the manner he
desired. Dublin was at the time interested in securing the annexation
of the Smith property and in providing Mr. Edwards with a sufficient
"level of comfort" so that he would not oppose the annexation at the
Franklin County hearing. Mr. Edwards made several specific requests,
and in consideration of the strategic benefit which the Tuttle Crossing
interchange had brought Dublin, City Council accommodated. Council went
further to state that any relaxation of standards would apply only to
this developer or his parcels in the southwest area and only to
developers in other areas who privately fund freeway interchanges or
equivalent public improvements.
In order to provide that level of comfort to Mr. Edwards, the City was
in part to adopt a land use plan for the 500-acre annexation area as an
indication of its intentions as to later zoning. This was accomplished
just prior to the County Commissioners' meeting. The Planning Division,
in conjunction with its consultant Bohm-NBBJ, prepared the "Proposed
Southwest Area Plan" during the month of January. The conceptual plan
was distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Council for
-2-
review and comment, and both groups, informally at least, approved it in
concept. Specific zoning classifications were indicated on Areas "A",
"B", and "c" in order to formally specify the City's land use
commitments to Mr. Edwards; general land uses were indicated on the
balance of the land to show how the overall development of the area
could logically proceed; and proposed rights-of-way widths for a
conceptual arterial street system based on those land uses were shown.
The City was also asked by Mr. Edwards to expedite the rezoning process,
relieve this developer of some new roadway construction and
responsibilities, reduce the usual park dedication requirement for the
multi-family parcels, insure 12 units per acre density, provide for
zoning classifications which limit repeat appearances before the
Planning and Zoning Commission ("straight zoning," not PUD), and change
a few specific development standards. The Council responded by agreeing
to accept rezoning applications immediately following the February
Commissioners' vote on the annexation, instead of deferring them until
July. The Staff responded by meeting with Mr. Edwards and his attorney
and agreeing upon the mechanisms which would be used to achieve these
ends. These were generally agreed to by the Staff and the developer's
representatives, and with regard to the specific parcels, this is the
understanding:
Smith Property "A"
1) SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District.
2) The applicant requested a height variance to permit multi-story
offices along I-270--none is needed.
3) The applicant wanted a 25-foot setback along 1-270 instead of 50
feet. The City Staff and Council in executive session agreed to
accept this change by the applicant's plat when Coffman Extension
(aka Britton Parkway) is platted.
4) Coffman Extension will be dedicated and constructed by Mr. Edwards
or his successor but not immediately--to be triggered by
substantial development of the site or when road connects to the
north.
Porter/Maddox Property "B"
1) R-12, Urban Residential District--with evidence of commitment to
"quality development" to be demonstrated by applicant. This is
being addressed by voluntary site plan review at Planning
Commission and submission of development text.
2) The applicant requested relief on park dedication requirement and
is contributing $100,000 to City and providing recreational
amenities within the apartment projects(s) and this was agreed to
by Council in executive sessions.
3) The applicant requested relief from construction of Wilcox-Rings
Connector shown on proposed Southwest Area Plan because he did not
need this road. He offered to provide half of the necessary
right-of-way (30 feet) along his north property line, provided he
I
I ..
I . . - f?J01r
-
....
-
\
\\
" I
.g " II
(5 .g
(5 'I
- \1
.)\
~- I
,
~ t ~
5 \------- .
---
"
~"' .g I
5 I
t I .~
\ 'S!;
.!::J il~
~ p~
-r
0 . N
Z .
I ~ i
~\ + ...... ~i
0
x'
~\1E >-
>- 0:5
j E ~\i!! 01-1
~ ~~i 0
Qj' i\5 ~-
~'
(ij ~ ;:; \
r-~J ..:
. . : I I ~ % ;
I : '" : I_
I ! ~
." I ,
Lg '--
~ <ii ::1
,;1' ',J
" P ;
j: i, ; il . i ~
,c-
o ~~ : 1 . ~.
i "j"l Co. ':
:=-______---=--J
I .." - -
.
I - ,
.. -L~-____~~---s---------- _.
! ._ ,~i-. -: ,...~
,,"- ' .
-,.' ", ." ._~..-
" .....
, ,..-..
- [
:: I.' ~ .
i
" '/
,.-."
J
!:
:z
~
X
;'
[' :: : :\ //
./
;:?/ ,j>
;/
;? ;
.'/
,,;//;?/ : ~
,;?y/
./ ..
,/
. ./
,;/
.:,//
./
// . ;~,.'.:-
;/:
/'
.
The applicant/owner bereby acknowledges that approval of (his) (her) (its)
request for rezoning to DR category by the Dublin Planning and
Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee
or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential
services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said applicant.
The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available
as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest
Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services
to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part
of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing.
2/26/90
Date Signature of A plicant or authorized
representative thereof.
On behalf of:
F.A. Kohler Co.
Applicant
February 26, 1990
We have reviewed the foregoing land use application and agree to its
being submitted and processed for approval by the City of Dublin. We are
the owners of the land in question, but are in contract to sell to the F. A.
Kohler Co.
~~~~~
~/~-uC?~
Rita Porter
7fJ h~ ..{:'or(..)o.,..cJeJ. a4- (~r d...k.
Ursula Maddox
Legal Description Porter tr acts
Applicant: F.A. Kohler Co.
Situated in the County of Fr anklin and in the State of Ohio and in the
Tow nship of Washington, and being p art of Virginia Military Survey No.
3011, and bounded and described as follows:
From an iron pin marking the intersection of the centerlines of Wilcox
Road (60' ) and Tuttle Road (50' ) , proceed N. 60 30' W. along the
center line of said Wilcox Road 891.00 feet to an iron pin, the point of
be ginning; thence continue N. 60 30' W. along the centerline of said
Wilcox Road 730.35 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 830 37' 30" E . 1 , 547 . 36
feet to a 9" wood post, passing an iron pin at 30.00 feet; thence S. 60
30' 30" E 1,112.50 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 830 29' W. 950.60 feet to
an iron pin; thence S. 60 31' E. 205.00 feet to an iron pin; S. 830 29'
W. 299.91 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 60 30' W. 591.00 feet to a 6"
wood post; thence S. 830 29' W. 297.00 feet to an iron pin, the point of
beginning, passing an iron pin at 267.00 feet, and containing 38.368
acres.
,
Tuttle Crossings
Porter and Maddox tr acts ; 38.368 acres E of Wilcox Road, W of Brittnn
Pkwy.
Property Owners list
Robert L. Barney Harry G. Kaszewicz
7192 Dublin Road Mary M. Kaszewicz
Dublin, Ohio 43017 5570 Tuttle Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Thomas E. Watkins , Sr.
Susan A. Watkins Darrel G. Mahanna
5488 WDcox Road Stella W. M ahanna
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 5550 Tuttle Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Katherine A. Tatt:erson
5472 Wilcox Road Edison C. Nelson
Dublin, Ohio 43017 Susie K. Nelson
5530 Tuttle Road
Kim J. Davies Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
5472 Wilcox Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017 John P. Stewart
Sherrie L. Stewart
Charles o. Holliday 5510 Tuttle Road
Mary M. Holliday Dublin, Ohio 43017
5450 Wilcox Road
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 Alvin R. Whitehead
Janet C. Whitehead
Edward W. Williams 5490 Tuttle Road
Virginia Katherine Williams Du blin, Ohio 4301 7
5424 Wilcox Road
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 Harold E. DeRhodes
Helen J. De Rho des
David H. Ge ase 5565 Wilcox Road
Delores Ge ase Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
5713 Cosgray Road
Amlin, Ohio 43002 Wilbert Martin Bell
Christine S. Bell
James M. Johnson 5585 WDcox Road
Judy A. Johnson Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
5654 Tuttle Road
Du blin, Ohio 4301 7 Donald J. Muir
Margaret A. Schubbe
Leah Margaret Norris 5611 WDcox Road
5610 Tuttle road Dublin, Ohio 43017
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
Wilcox-Tuttle Limited
Samuel L. Stille c/o Multicon Bldrs.
Susan C. Stille 941 Chatham Lane
5590 Tuttle Road Colum bus , Ohio 43221
Dublin, Ohio 43017
-- ~'V-
-.
-
- o OAD ' N oa"!t/orJ" W --..
101.00'
11= 11= I!! iji!~ ij il
....
a ~ a I al: ali a ~...
I' ;-
-< -
. ..,. \
DAW) H."
I ..- \
I.... AaD
WHII._ i ! I z I
,.... ACllO
1JI~ ~ I~ I
-<-I i I I
..........L. oX! ;lklSl !~
2 IlJSAII C. I1lU f11r ;
~ '.731 ..",." (101AL) f11J:l a ~ls:"::I B I
CD N I I
c;I;II r~~ a
ill rn '! ~ i!i~ ! I
II ):I
~ ..... IIIl1..W. 01"11 !\l I
KAI2EWCZ
co "m ...... (101AL) Ole> ~ II I I
0 ~;II I
.. ~" I ~
i JM
0NtN1. .. .. .... ell", -<! \ \
IIAHANHA r-'
,.n. N:JiIDJ (101AL) .. )>0 a
. f" Z
:;o- j \ \
I11Z
IllIllllN C. . IUIAII IC. lJ'li'
IELOOH - \
1.13' N:JiIDJ (101AL)
~\\\.
..... Po .. ItEJIfY L ~ "'~
S1iWAAT ~
'.731 AaD (101AL) ""- "-
"'"
,
A.1t. ....0.
vmH<AD
1.321 AaD
~~i ~
-- ~
"Em .. I ih5...
alY Of COUJllllUS CORPORA nON UNE ~ I I
QRD, NO, 1882-87. O,R, V, 10872 E18
~i~
~ 10-00' ~~I
~ !
-----
,...;- __ PROPO!oE:D 8RlTON PARKWAY i~ lJ
E XTENS ION
/"'------ ~AJ
~!fO
~llJ
g~ ~fTl
I~~I r~
zn
~eii el~, .-<
0- I~II
U> ~~E:;Z ~ ~ " ~
..... ~~o ~ ;0 ,~~I
0_ :II ~tljll~m l:J )>
r ' a !
0 .... i~~~IIl~~ III
~O-<?Z ~ I lJ
N , >o~ ~
g- N "'t:~
~ ~ ~E dl
~~ia
'P I 15.
--l III
'" . ~
"
)l .. S1
o-
r 0
0
--
I
.... .
~
3/28/90
3/30/90
5/9/90(1)
5/9/90(2) ~ ~ .
6/7/90 , ,
7/9/90
7/11/90
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Rezoning Application 90-003
38.368 acres E. of Wilcox Ro ad, N. of Tuttle Road
1. Perm itte d Uses: The uses that are permitted are those s pecifie d in the
Urban Res ide ntia 1 Zo n in g Dis tric t ( C hap te r 1157) of the City of Du blin,
Ohio.
2. Development Standards: De ve 10 pme nt of the site shall be gover ne d by
the de velopme nt standards set out in the Urban Residential zoning
ordinance and such further re q u~.r.e me nts as are spec Uie d in this text.
This text is vo lu nteere d by the a p p lic ant for rezoning, and the
re prese ntatio n is im p licit that these additional re prese ntations are made
with the agreement of the a p p 1 ic ant.
3. Yard and Setback Re q uireme nts: The minimum setback for all buildings
and parking shall be go ve r ne d by Dublin Code. Howe ver, for the are a of
W ilc 0 x Road north of the existing homes, the building setback shall be 50
feet from the edge of the new rig ht of way.
4. Traffic and Circulation:
a. . Curbcuts. Curbcuts on ~Jilcox Road and on the re lac ate d
Wilcox/Rings Road a 10 n g the no r t h side of the site shall have a minimum
200 foot spacing from other curbcuts (except sin g Ie family driveways) and
pub lic streets. The proposed curbcuts shall either a lig n with cuts on the
other side of the respective street or shall be offset from the other side of
the respective street cuts by at le ast 100 feet (measured from the
ce nterline of each curbcut).
b. De dic atio n of Right of Way: A p P lic ant s hall de die ate 30' of right
of way a 10 n g the north and west property lines in loc a tio ns necessary to
provide right of way for the re loc atio n of Rings/Wilcox Road to conform
with the p la ns submitted herewith. A p P lic ant shall de dic ate prese ntly
held highway easements in fee, providing the 1a n d continues to be used
for highway purposes.
c. Co ns tr uc tio n of Ro a d way: Construction of the re loc atio n of
Rings/Wilcox Road is the res pons ibility of governmental authorities and not
the a p p lic ant.
d. Applicant will obtain approval from fire authorities that
appropriate access for emergency s e r v ic e s is provide d to the site.
e. Prim ary access to the site shall be from Britto n Parkway, with
secondary access to be from W ilco x Road. If the re loc ation of
Wilcox/ Rings Roads occurs, A p P lic ant I s site pla n shall a d dress access and
c ire ulatio n with re gar d to the new roadway s y s te m .
~EVELOPMENT STANDARDS I
- Rezo.ning Ap p lie ation 90-003
38.368 acres E. of Wilcox Ro ad, N. of Tuttle Road
.. Page 2; version of 7/11/90
5. Landscaping: ~.:.-
a. Du blin Code Chapter .p87 will go ve r n landscaping re q uireme nts.
b. There are prese ntly four sin g le fam ily homes a 10 n g the east side
of W ilea x Road that access W ilco x Road, the Johnson, Holliday,
T atterso n/ Da vies and Watkins residences. A 10 n g the rear (e ast) of these
homes there is a 100 foot area e x te n din g east from the lot lines that is
tre ate d as fo 110 w s :
1st 25 feet from lot line: All vegetation and trees to be fe nce d and
preserved. Existing gaps in tree line for two norther n houses to be
fille d with appropriate plantings. For two southern houses, if any
co ns tr uc tio n of buildings or parking lots ta kes place south of the
ditc h then a p p lie ant will insta 11 a 3 to 4 foot earthern mound with
plantings providing a minim urn 757. s urn mer opacity at 6 feet a bo ve
gr a de.
2nd 25 feet from lot line: .~o build zone e xce pt for utilities, bike
..~...
paths and landscaping. A 50 foot no build zone with sim ilar
restrictions e x is ts a 10 n g the north line of the norther nmost
house(Watkins).
50 to 100 feet from lot lines: special tre atme nt area disc usse d in
part 10, architecture, be 10 w .
All limitations in the entire 100 feet from the rear of the a bo ve
four houses will ce ase at any time that all four homes are converted to
nonresidential use.
c. Alo n g the ditc h at the southern boundary of the site, e xce pt for
that portion of the site that e xte nds south of the d itc h, "the notch", a 25
foot zone' 'is provide d in which all existing trees will be preserve d, un le s s
removal is required by pub lie authorities.
d. A landscape plan for the area to the north and west of the
existing single fam ily lots has been prepared, and is incorporated herein.
Applicant shall make the im proveme nts in d ic ate d on the landscaping plan
at the time of completion of any development a djace nt to W ilco x Road.
6. Height District: Maximum height for all buildings shall be 35' as
measured per Du blin Zoning Co de .
7. Parklandl Recreational F acUities:
a. In s atisfactio n of parkland de die atio n r:~.q uireme nts (Du blin Code
Sections 1109.02 and 1109.021) a p p lie ant shall pay to the City of Du blin
the sum of $100,000.00 for acquisition of off site parkland.
b. Bikeways. A p P lic ant shall provide bikeways to connect to Du blin
bikeway systems to the north and so uth of the site and to connect this
bikeway to the we s te r n edge of the site. These bikeways shall be 8' in
width. Location of the bikeways shall be determ ine d by a p p lie ant with
the approval of the Direc tor of the Dublin Par ks and Recreation
De p artme nt.
c. Recreational fae ilities shall be loc ate d either in the interior of
the & ite or in an area not a d j ace n t to the existing and de ve 10 pe d R-l lots
-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS \
aezoning Ap p lic atio n 90-003
. J8.368 acres E. of Wilcox lfc)ad, N. of Tuttle Road
.. Page ~. version of 7/11/90
,
fronting on W ilco x Ro ad, u n le s s ow ners of all four lots agree in writing to
. .
the contrary.
.
8. Outside Lighting: Exterior lighting, other than typical residential
illum in atio n of porc hes and patios, shall be sub jec t to the follow ing
standards:
a. all poles shall be of a d ark fi n is h .
b. all lighting fixtures shall be of the c u to ff type.
c. all poles shall n61 e xcee d 28' in height.
d. acce nt lighting of buildings or landscaping shall be perm itte d if
of c utoH variety from co nce ale d sources.
e. direct or indirect glare into the eyes of motorists or pedestrians
shall be avoided.
Threre will be no "wall pac k" or floo d lights facing the rear of the
e x is ti n g sin g le family homes on W ilco x Road. Any porc h li g h ts will be
lim tie d in wattage to 100 watts in this area. Any parking lot lighting in
this area will have glare shields."installed on the residential side. These
lim ita tio ns will ex p ire at the time all four homes are no 10 n ge r used for
reside ntial purposes.
9. Parking and Loading: Re g ulate d by Du blin Code C hap te r 1193.
10. Are hiteeture: The site plan shall in d ic a te building elevations,
materials and co lors. All roofs shall be of at le as t 5/12 p itc h. Colors
shall be earth tone only. In the area to the east of the four existing
sin g le fam ily homes on W ilco x Road, in add itio n to the 50 foot no build
zone starting at the pro perty line of those homes, there will be an
additional zone betwee n 50 and 100 feet from the east property lines of
those homes. In this zone, special em ph a s is on arc hitecture will be used
to ens ure the privacy of the W ilco x Road res ide nts. This may entail
orie ntin g buildings so that no ope ning:;; face the homes, or not having
seco n d s to r y openings f aci n g the homes. The a p p lic ant may build sin g le
s to r y structures (without these lim it a tio ns) or provide parkin g in this
area. Buildings to be constructed a djace nt to the four R-l homes on
W ilco x Road shall be architecturally detaile d and finis he d to provide
a ttr ac ti ve elevations facing the R-l neigh bors. This may include a higher
quality of fi n is h 0 n the side facing the homes than on comparable sides of
other structures in the de ve lopme nt.
11. Site Ph n: P r io r to development, a p p lic ant "s hall prepare and forward
to the Du blin Planning Department for re vie w a site plan for any portion
of the site to be de ve 10 pe d . Follow in g co ns u ita tio ns with s ta ff, the site
plan shall be scheduled for re view, in accor d with these standards, before
the Du blin Planning and Zo n i n g Co m m is s io n in pub lie he aring. Notice
shall be give n, by re gular mail, to all . property ow ners a d jo in i n g
un de velo pe d portions of the tr act.
. .
C I T y 0 F D U B L I N
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, July 16, 1990
7:30 P.M.
There will be a Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 33-90 at the Dublin City
Council Meeting on Monday, July 16, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers at 6665 Coffman Road. The title of said Ordinance is:
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF
ZONING ON A 38.368 ACRE TRACT LOCATED
ON THE EAST SIDE OF WILCOX ROAD APPROXI-
MATELY 900 FEET NORTH OF TUTTLE ROAD.
TO BE REZONED FROM: R-1A , RESTRICTED
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (current
Washington Township zoning) TO: R-12,
URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Rezoning Application - Z90-003
Location: 38.368 acres located on the east side of Wilcox Road, approxi-
mately 900 feet north of Tuttle Road
Existing Zoning: R~lA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (current
Washington Township zoning)
Request: R-12, Urban Residential District
Proposed Use: Multi~family residential development
Applicant: F. A. Kohler Company, c/o Christopher Cline
6665 Coffman Road · Dublin, Ohio 43017 · (614) 761-6500
Dublin . . , where yesterday meets tomorrow
7665797 P.02
..
14:27 FROM BOHM-NBBJ
JLL-11-1990
i .
.'
0 -
r .
, . ~O
- . (' I ,.
I! ....-
..-.
. . .
,
..
.. ~N
~ J.?~ i/N~7 .I'1f1Jft -
),...1. # · -9:41) g ~S""~ -
- /~.1./dn _
tlJIJ')fI" _ _
/-U.--J _
~ .,,,-
-
-
-- - -
~~'--~o..,:Tt.
:A.',; - ~': ,:..':1('_
~-
- r!= ~
or
'"
,
C I T y 0 F 0 U B L I N
Department of Planning & Development
MINUTES OF MEETING
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JUNE 7, 1990
7:30 P.M.
1. Rezoning Application - Z90-003
2. Concept Plan - Proposed Phase 44 of Muirfield Village
Scheduled but not discussed.
3. Concept Plan - Proposed Phase 45 of Muirfield Village
Scheduled but not discussed.
4. Corridor Development District - CDD90-007 - David Hobbs BMW (Dublin
Village Center) - 3890 Tuller Road
5. Corridor Development District - CDD90-006 - Rax Restaurant
6. Rezoning Application - Z90-001 - Starkey/Coffman
7. Final Development Plan - Brandon Section 5, Par I
8. Conditional Use - CU90-90-005 - Auto repair
The meeting of the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order
at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Geese. Other Commission members in attendance were
Mr. Amorose, Mr. Berlin, Mr. Kranstuber, Mr. Leffler, Mr. Manus and Mrs.
Melvin. Staff members in attendance were Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Willis,
Mr. Mack, Mr. Covey, Mr. Jones, Ms. Jordan and Mr. Banchefsky.
- 1. Rezoning Application - Z90-003
All were familiar with this area so Mr. Geese felt the slides were
unnecessary. After several meetings with attorneys for the applicant, area
residents, and Chris Cline, these parties were still some distance apart on
setback, no build zone and materials to be used for the apartments. Residents
are requesting similar standards which are used in other locations such as
Perimeter Lakes. This application was tabled last month to give the
Commission a chance to further review this the standards.
Mr. Cline mentioned that there is a request for a 100-foot setback along
Wilcox Rd. to the north of the four single-family homes. Also a request for a
50-foot no-build zone to the east of those homes while preserving all of the
existing trees and obtaining the set back, also a 30 foot no-build zone to the
north of the last single-family home. Mr. Cline has met with the Franklin
County Engineer's office twice this past week. The County is working on the
straightening of Wilcox Rd. even though as of July 3rd, it will be in the City
of Dublin. A possible solution to traffic might be extending Tuttle Road on
through to Avery Road. More meetings are scheduled in the next few weeks for
Dublin and the County determining to what extent the County is willing to
underwrite improvements. Mr. Cline mentioned the need to build utilities,
bike path and landscaping in that area. Two acres to the south of the tree
5131 Post Rd, Suite #105 Dublin, Ohio 43017 614,761.6553 FAX 614.7616566
line (residents refer to it as "the notch") which the residents have requested
to have undeveloped. Mr. Cline stated that is not something they can do. He
said the notich will more than likely be used as a density credit, to sit
there undeveloped, or it may be added to one of the lots on Tuttle or Wilcox
Roads if someone wanted to expand those sites. They can commit to the request
of earthtone colors for the entire site but can not commit to natural
materials. Man-made materials used in multi-family sites resemble, wear
better and are more easily maintained in the long run, than
natural materials.
Columbus and Dublin have come to an agreement as to the alignment of Tuttle
Rd.
Mr. Geese inquired if the property is in Dublin. Mr. Cline responded that
barring the filing by July 3rd of a referendum by the citizens of Dublin, it's
in Dublin and there is no court mechanism that can stop it otherwise.
Mr. Cline mentioned he will not ask Council to have a public hearing on the
rezoning and to pass it until after July 3rd. Regarding the parcel to the
west, (Windmiller property) the rezoning has been filed. They filed a
proposed preliminary plat in which they propose to dedicate the entire 80-foot
right-of-way of Tuttle Rd. plus this realignment of Wilcox Rd. One thing to
be changed on the standards regarding the park contribution, there was to be a
cash contribution for this parcel and the multi-family parcel to the west
rather than an actual contribution of land. We have reached agreement with
the Parks Department and Planning and Zoning that the entire piece is
designated as single family in the Windmiller rezoning, consisting of a little
bit over 7 1/2 acres, would be contributed as park for both of these two two
sites.
Kathy Tatterson, a Wilcox Rd. resident, referred to the meeting on May 30 with
Mr. Bowman and Ms. Clarke and the area neighbors to discuss curb cuts being at
least 200 feet away from the existing driveways, that all exterior lighting be
- cut-off lighting with house side shields, that all structures be finished with
the same materials on all four sides and that natural materials be used, that
the existing tree line be maintained on all sides where it borders the
existing R-l properties, and where the tree line is broken on the west side of
the property, that screening be installed to a height of 6 feet because there
are several breaks in the tree line. She asked that the portion of the
property that borders the Watkins' property, which is the farthest north
house, be completely mounded and screened with plantings which are opaque to a
height of 6 feet with evergreens or a fence be constructed. In addition, they
had several major concerns regarding drainage and the protection of the
existing trees. The area is low-lying and it slopes to the south and west.
They request that the site plan review include a storm water review. Ms.
Tatterson mentioned the tree line is 30-35 feet wide in some areas and they
would like to see that remain. Because their area is a very low density, that
there be a lOa-foot no-build zone. In other words, 100 feet to the first
dwelling structure, 50-feet to any garage or parking structure and that that
garage or parking structure be screened to code to create a zone of transition
from the existing ranch homes, then a step up to the garages and then a step
up to the 35-foot height limitations for the R-12 property. From the City of
Dublin, she is requesting that a cul-de-sac be put in place that is
simultaneous with the development of this property (Wilcox Rd.). Ms.
Tatterson mentioned that the traffic is rapidly increasing.
Ms. Clarke and Mr. Cline displayed diagrams of the development. Commission
members and residents gathered to look over diagrams.
Mr. Geese asked for Mrs. Tatterson's summary. She stated, the residents feel
that when the rezoning is approved that their homes will no longer have any
value on the open market as homes, nor will they have any value as commercial
development. Because of the agreement that was made by City Council to go
ahead with this, they feel their hands are tied as far as any creative
solutions that could have been brought to bear on this area and they feel that
no amount of buffering or landscaping will ever make up for that. They feel
they have been damaged and are looking for the Commission's help to help them
minimize their losses and to try to get this back on the right track.
Mr. Geese asked for additional comments from the audience. Another resident
commented he was concerned about the location of the cul-de-sac on Wilcox Road
coming south on Wilcox Road. He mentioned it doesn't even touch his property.
He said it would take away his right-of-way and cause him to lose additional
right-of-way beyond the cul-de-sac.
Mr. Cline addressed the residents. He mentioned the development standards
answer several of the residents' questions. Regarding the 200 foot curb cut
from a private driveway, he doesn't think will be a problem, but until he has
the site plan alignment, he can't commit to that. Cutoff lighting is in the
standards. Bronze fixtures and poles of a certain height (28 feet?).
Regarding same materials on four sides, he cannot commit to that. He is
anticipating that it will be a high-quality project, but a multi-family
product is not one that necessarily has exactly the kind of materials on each
side on these larger structures. Regarding trees, he committed in the
standards that they will preserve all trees within 10 feet of the property
line. Screening opaque to 6 feet. The standards that they provided last time
provided for a 4 foot mound with the minimum opacity to 6 feet high. Since he
- made that commitment, the request for the no-build zone has been relayed to
hm. He has not met with the residents directly because after the last
meeting, he met with staff and they decided they would meet with the
residents. Mr. Geese asked why the 6 foot screening can't be met on the west.
Mr. Cline said that is not a problem. Mr. Cline said he will pull it out of
the standards where it relates to the homes along Tuttle Rd. Mr. Geese asked
about maintaining the tree line within 30 feet. Mr. Cline feels that all the
trees along the stream bed are within 10 feet.
Mr. Geese asked the Staff when the road is going to be built, does Franklin
County Commissioners and Engineers have a commitment in writing that they are
going to do it in 1991 or 1992. When will it happen, will the developers, in
the event that they won't do it in 1991, will the developer do it? Pat Bowman
said when the plan was done, it was presented to City Council, and we felt
that the road had worked with the best interest of the area. Also, we are
going get the land donated. We met with Franklin County Engineer's Office,
who said they would be willing to work with us on it. They had purchased the
right-of-way. We feel this thing has come together the best that it can. We
don't know how we will make the bend on the north (from existing Wilcox Road
eastward toward Rings Road). Mr. Geese asked why the developer is not paying
for the construction of a portion of it like they have done on Avery Road or
Muirfield Drive. Mr. Bowman said staff is committed to work with the
developer because of the major impact that Tuttle Road interchange had on many
improvements in that area. We feel that with the right-of-way dedications and
the other improvements that will be made eventually, that they are
satisfactory and we feel good about the direction we are going.
Mr. Amorose asked about the extension of Wilcox Road and how wide is the road
going to be? Mr. Bowman said Wilcox Road and surrounding section will be a
collector street within a 60 foot right-of-way with 30-36 feet of pavement.
Mr. Amorose asked if he felt that was adequate. Mr. Bowman replied yes. Mr.
Amorose asked about Tuttle Road. Mr. Bowman replied Tuttle Road will be a
minimum of 5 lanes, 60 feet of pavement.
Mr. Kranstuber asked why would Dublin and the County have any interest in
widening? Mr. Bowman said it will need to be done anyway. There is still a
jog in Wilcox Road. Wilcox will have to have some ability to be a collector
type street. Mr. Cline said the Edwards Company paid about 28 million dollars
for the interchange and that was a subject th~t Council felt was fairly
significant in terms of addressing this before because of the contribution
that has previously been made to the community. Mr. Bowman suggested that at
the second review process, at that point, we will either have a commitment to
approve that road or we will know where the responsibility lies.
Mr. Kranstuber asked if the City feels comfortable with the land use? Mr.
Bowman said yes, they feel comfortable with the land use. Mr. Cline added
that Wilcox Road is not the front door to this project, that it is only a
small, auxiliary access. This project will access Britton Parkway. That is
where he anticipates the main traffic will go and that's where the traffic
signals are going to be to get out onto Tuttle Road. There is nothing but
farmland out to the west.
Mrs. Melvin asked if they were to approve the zoning, including the second
- review process, that there would not be any housing in the ground until the
road issue would be resolved. She wished to assure that there will not be any
multi-family housing or a lot of traffic that is going to be causing a lot of
inconvenience to the residents who are already there. Mr. Bowman said they
suggested a cul-de-sac to the south, as well, and that would be part and
parcel of the road improvement. Mr. Bowman also mentioned that they want to
get back to Council and close that funding decision. Mrs. Melvin requested
that safe lighting for parking lots be used, while not causing an annoyance to
residents who are already there. Mr. Cline assured her that there are only 4
homes within a 30 acre site. The degree to which this site impacts is only
going to be a very small part of the site that is next to them.
Mr. Cline expressed a problem with the setback along Wilcox Road. He said it
would soon bend around to the northeast so that will be out of sight. The
letter he wrote to Mrs. Clarke said that they would set the first structure
north of the no-build zone (50 feet). Then we would be code setback from
there on through, which would be. 30 feet. He feels this is the only
significant difference with the residents.
Mr. Leffler said he is not opposed to the R-12 zoning request but is opposed
to the methodology used to come forward with this. One of the staff
recommendations is that we make adherence to the development standards as a
condition of zoning. Now it is apparent that not everyone in zoning agrees
with everything that has been said. He feels a direct meeting with the
residents is needed to resolve some of the details. He questioned if the
rezoning of Wilcox Road can be made contingent on that realignment or
construction of the road regardless of who is going to pay for it. If if is
not appropriate to make it contingent, would the applicant be willing to
accept no entry onto Wilcox Road since all traffic will be going east. Mr.
Cline said he would not restrict entry onto Wilcox Road. Mr. Leffler said
there is not enough information in the development standards to tie it to an
approval at this time.
Mr. Berlin said a commitment from the County Engineer for the realignment of
Wilcox Road is needed.
Mr. Geese expressed surprise at the fact that the main entrance will be off
Britton Parkway at the east end of the property. He feels he cannot vote on
this tonight because he can't agree with the land use. Unless there is a
commitment with the road, he doesn't feel it will work. Mr. Geese mentioned
to Mrs. Tatterson that if she comes into a meeting again with a list of items
she has not given to commission members, that it will not do her any good. He
needs copies of these in the future.
Ms. Clarke said if the commission wants to table the application again, input
is needed from them as to what the appropriate requests are. She mentioned
that the Commissioners have a copy of Mr. Cline's letter which mentions what
he can and cannot do. Mr. Geese asked if the neighbors have seen Mr. Cline's
letter or the development standards. Mrs. Tatterson had not seen the letter
but did receive a copy of the development standards from Ms. Clarke today.
Mr. Cline reiterated that he distributed the development standards previous to
the last meeting and they have not been revised.
- Mr. Geese asked for a motion to table this issue until they can resolve the
discrepancies between the developer and residents. Mr. Kranstuber said he was
not as concerned with the development standards as he is with the roadways.
Ms. Clarke said the roadway commitment cannot be made by the developer. The
relocation of Wilcox Road is outside of his control. It's something which
will require governmental action in order to be accomplished.
Mr. Cline mentioned that his application is a straight zoning with a
commitment to come back with a site plan. Mr. Geese asked Mr. Cline for more
definitive information as to what he wants to do with this. Mr. Berlin
rescinded his motion. Mr. Berlin then made a motion to approve the rezoning
on the basis that the developer, residents and staff can work out the
discrepancies in the development standards and that the developer can provide
at least some commitment from the County Engineer that the realignment of
Wilcox Road will be done.
Mrs. Melvin seconded the motion. Mr. Geese said he is voting no against the
usage.
Mr. Banchefsky mentioned that this is a straight zoning request. He mentioned
the Commission is used to having planned developments where they get to see
things 3 or 4 times. He said straight zoning requests are absolutely
appropriate and in this case, the developer has agreed to do more by agreeing
.
to back the site plan for review and approval of the Planning and Zoning
Commission at a later date.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, abstain; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr.
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Leffler, no; Mr. Geese, no; Mrs. Melvin, yes; Mr. Berlin,
yes. (Approved 4-2-1)
Mr. Geese asked Ms. Clarke what procedure was needed to deal with the
compromise between the developer and the residents for the motion. Ms. Clarke
said there are two positions, one 50 feet and the other 100feet. She feels a
middle ground can be found on this and other issues.
Mr. Geese added that the procedure for the passage of a Zoning petition is
that i will be read 3 times by Council. The first reading has been heard in
Council so the next procedure will be a public hearing in Council. Ms. Clarke
said the formal document will be submitted to Council and will be scheduled
for the public hearing. Following that hearing at City Council, there is the
third reading when they will actually vote on it. The zoning will be in
effect 30 days after that third reading. At earliest, it will be in effect in
August.
-
.. -.. r \\ ~ h II
- ,-l )..:... "r\:l _ I
' , \ /R-2~ tj-' " . I
fi:i- I I rr: . ~
' I _. ,
.---; PU D -, --.., \~ 1r, /
c.-i - l -,"j /1..4 ~~ \ - "~. 'l: ,A ,
f\l~ 'R.2 ~ ~ I i PU 0 _ :-l-f:~~
D r \lull ~.,;o-' \, \\ r ~ _:0---- ~\
t' PUD - "'--', R d I
"\ r _ _ _ -.- I
\ '2' --- _ X1k,.. I \ IPUD ~_ I,
,""'-- . U-' "~ _ r I
~. ~':jf r i~ ~ ,~~. /" 'iP \ ,... ..l
R" . lli 1 SO !'\i 4"" ~ '" " '/IJ'
'1:0-1 l~R~ ~ I o~ u ~ .. CB ~
PCD -~~---', pet 1" u' ~r ~8~i~2, I' '
' 1= I~ \ J cc ~ ~ -, t
~ ~ \ \ ~- -a -'!!, I
~ ,. I ( /.. -) r'CC , J Ccc _ r- ~~ I, :
=-.:=:- \ ". ~ \ \ 1'} Z/ ~uo "- ~_ -z ~,
- ~. j-1"-n.J RI \ ,'Pi '/1 " ."1, ~ I II l0-
G! ~ s::, --1_-, /-- T L;: r;' ({' ~so ~~ f-=r /I ,'(\1'1' I k
......~"t. 'f ~ I ~ ~ P U OW" ~ 1 '-
o ~ ..Ll ~~ ~'n I~R ~ ~ ~ ....iVn- T 1/ 1'1!'), \, ::::
=- ~\ 'L;:J RJ; .. , j LI 7, ~~,~ '-~pu~:!o A ,,' rli I--
LI \.---- -, T - ~~ ""'i;;;;'J /
--->-I _ ,- ~ I -'/ _(.-
- \nmE R:I, i i ~ _" .-
l R - l...---1 -- "F\\-R - . * l,.---. ~ OLR '1\ 'I.s~ /=.", L;" r-
I \\... _ \ I " ~ ~ \ II ~ \ \ ~
' --. ----- J I~J ,
-:- . - II R \ "_. cc 0 -"=- , '--
~\ ~I ~ _L -1 ..~ '\ \ \:, i " ' \I\\r. . -' PUD ,_' ~ \ .' ~
1\\\ - " /'.--- '/ ,'8..''' L
\. ? \ '\ \ peD \J \ :::~r ~ I\=:
\ ~ '....------- ~ \ ~
\ . '\ - -
=-: "" -'- ',. , \ R-I J lit
_,I ,A "t-\ -, :'i\ \ ----= 'PVOI i ~ \
--L /' I _ \ \\ ~ ,
\If \ ! ~ h - "',<.... c/~:::::--( \ ~1
H ,~, '~, ~ ~.
~-hv- / ~N,,~ff __ \, _ \
~ \ =- ~ ~~, ----------0,._ \ ~WS
' 'J(..X
! " ,II
~ \ "..
'-', ~'"
R15' ",- '---,(""""'" ,,.-I
, ~~ '\, ---
~'='I\ i \ " -.e:&-
,." ,
'.... , , , ~. ~
~ ~ ---- ,',"
. . " ~
' -~~
IL \--- ,;._= / -c.qO-OO3
~ \ c = "-1:2-
~\ " '------- \---; '~""\i /" / 'R _1/\ ~ "
--, ,
',:;?
\\~ @
\ ~
, "" '~6-:\~ '
" \ I . ~
, "', ,~
'"
--".~
,.~
..~ ~ ~
~ Q ~
~ o.
~ . , ~ ~
.~ '. ~ : !:? ~
-zs , I ()
Q 1- ! t- CS""
~ Q n I
:J 1t ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
.0 :> 7." "'" Ii ::J
J: ~ :) '@..lO
' ~ \)j I IIIJ~
1P I 3 It t\ D> ' '~ C3
~ 11 i ij \>> ~ ~ I __.
zd\
- 3 ~~
cO '" D..!
,
~ ' -
~
. . -
, I - -, . , '. f L_ '''~r~b1lf''''r 1~1~
t - - ...., --. '-.:L .......
-- ',...,. . ,- "",. "l<._"" ~ . ,.', .......... . ...~., "..
I .; u ......_. ....C<~.~__.. .
,..':''t.. ,. -l-~,
. . - -r'.' .. _
--- . ..... '-. '
-
-. ...:;", c_ - .~....>""'.... ~-.....ll IT If_
'UU". _ J _ ',' I
I
---..
" I
.~~~:. _l~; ,. ~
...41 'C'... -.
~ v.-r:.......
;~. ~:. 'S ~
. . ,ch..
.... ....!,
, ..... :;.. "
:.~ ',;
.., ~..~~~~,. .
. ~...
'. ;. A..
"'11"
. ~
~i:.. ,t..,' ~
:~ J,.... "2 ~
~ ,,'-p ..
~ '~, . -
:..,' ~~ .f i :J
"J'I' . -4
"'-: "", ',~ Z
,."'\_ it,.
',. ,') ~ '.
(.; ,.
: ~. ;.:.~,,: ! ~
l('.r~,. ~','
.1'--: . I
.i:~~I., '::~ I ':
u'" .( ~
. - .,...... .
".~"'.'..'.'3 ~
. ~ I
:. ' I .
. ,. , .
;>> ; .
-; I ~ .' :..
\) I \l eo ,
. .
t."
. .
. '. , .
, .
. .
. - - -- - - - ,-
,
. -- -- .. .
-- -- . -
--' -_.- ~
' T
"
...
..
..-..
.
.. ~
2 r
L
<t t\
Z
J
~
)
~ ~ ~
~ ~ -~ ._~---,
. l .I:l'.--'"
-- -l""'..I~_,oIt'" -"'... .~... . _. ,r:;.
I ".. .,.___.
-- I
~ ~-~ I ~
I.. ~ . _....,_... +=-
.. --, .... '.' '
.. .~.
~
" .
.,... .. . - - -
I . "---'" _ _ _ ,"'
' . ...
f"ooo.. _
~- II.. . ....
, .' ... "
I
t
~ 1
~ -
i - _
Q ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~
, . --
~ ~ ~
- --
G
~ ~ -
~ < 6 g
~ ~ ~
~ !
~ ,
1
I
. Ii
/....
0 !If
-0
III rJ :r I
~ . . .
l/)
I~I ~ ~ Wen
(:)
Ii ~Q::>N a ~
,.l:l : ~~"! N -~
fl~ .. N ~
m ~ ~ ;og -
(L I ! el~l/)~~~~ 5
<C uJ 0 m
~ ~ m ~ ur~ ~ ....J -~
I~;' c: C>
z<:>_ u %
2 Q: l.50m"'~ Vl ~
~i;l a. i5' ::t .-
~ Z3et... -0 5
>-g; ~ ~ ill
1=1; 5 ~
~I l)~
d~ ~
(}::: ~ 2 ~8
W zi5
(L ig
o~g ~
(}::: ~ i ----- \
(Li NOISN3.lX3 ~ \ \
).VMXl:!"d N01I\H~ a~SOdOl:ld ___,
--
! 1 I ~
! .00'011 I
II I I~~
ii~
I I ~ 8~3 tL90~ '^11"O 'L8-l:11IH 'ON 'OHa
3Nn NOLL Y~dijOO snsnmoo .:10 )J.I:)
witB~ S JO E
~ i~~
C!lIOY m'll
0YlIB1J}ft
'0'1' If 1I'V
....
"'"
~ ~ t1V.LOlJ DIOV Cl,'l
" " .1WAWS
. ' JJIlOHI If '.. NHOI'
'\\\~
\ ~ t1V.LOlJ DIOV SiCL
NllS13N
~J'J 'll IMI,. If '0 NOSm
\
\ , ZW
_0:::
1 f z'-' ,
I 04: " t1V.LOlJ DIOV SiL'~
LI ,.... I YNNVIlYft
WIO .... If .. "DlAIVO
I I I .... 0::,,9
~+ ' .
..
li~ p::~
I <lcQ t1V.LOlJ DIOV etJ.' L
I ~ >-c>~l!Ji la-J'f) , ~
.,..,. If ""If
I I : =z 5B i d: ..
I ~~ < I uJ
0::0 ~
I Ii INlX)~ a:w t1V.lOl.) DIOV Cl,'L
~N~
I I ~ J..- ~i ..JuJ nlU.S '0 HYSnS ~
:>100 If , 1J/IIMl
:::EQ:I')_ ceO
I
~ 1-)- S lIn,'OII" E 205.00'
I wi ~ ~dl 51
dd !
S3H0Y mn
SIAIOII 'II HYJ1
f
\ DIOV mn I
3SY:Hl '0
If "If <I1/IYO
\ .00' LIll . N
S
\ ~ I 4 ~
I~I :~8 :.!
\ '" 4' I I i ~IB
W..c!
",'" "- Ii q lL-Iq r~ :I~ 4 ~
~~- t ~ -
~"- - W _
,
I . .oo'L811
-
l/oII1Ott
. I ' .
>
.. .~
li