065-87 Ordinance Amended
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. ~ Form No. 2806-A
Ordinance No. _________(t5-_87 (Amended) Passed_ --- ------------- ___19
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER TO
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH
WANDEL & SCHNELL, ARCHITECTS
TO PREPARE DESIGN SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR A COMMUNITY SWIM-
MING POOL
WHEREAS, the Village of Dublin has previously entered into an agreement
with Wandel and Schnell for a swimming pool study;
WHEREAS, the final report for this study has been received by the Village;
and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Village of Dublin to have a pool constructEd
by the summer of 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Village of Dublin,
State of Ohio, 6 of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the Acting Village Manager and Finance Director be, and
hereby is, authorized to enter into a contraCT With Wandel and Schnell,
Architects to prepare design specifications and engineering for a
community swimming pool at the Earlington Park site; and
Section 2. That the quotation from Wandel and Schnell in an amount not
to exceed $86,300.00 be, and hereby is, accepted.
Section 3. That said design specifications should be completed to allow
for sufficient time to receive bids and complete construction by the
summer of 1988.
Section 4. That this Ordinance be, and the same hereby is, declared to
be an emergency measure necessary for the public health, safety and
welfare, and therefore, shall take effect and be in force immediately
upon its passage.
Passed this 6th day of July , 1987.
~
Mayor - Presiding Officer
Attest:
--1 Y!t ~
~,
Clerk of Co ncil
Sponsor: Mr. Joseph Jankowski, Jr. , Council Member
. . of tttis Ordinance/Resohrttnn
, hereby ce~lfy htha~"~::SOf Dublin in aCCOfGJ"CC ..ith
were posted IA tel .
Section 131.~ of lhe Obio R"'sed;~
J~YJ;'
Cttr\ of Coline"
.
to 0 P 0
"<:>000 0
0() '" C) c 0
\ -........... -
<:Ie Y)~""" ~" - I
~~ g.~ ~ I
1
0-1 ~: 0 0 0
~<'b 0.0 0
c:t \, - ':> <:) ...,
)- ~ ~ ~- -j; ~ ; \~
00 00 00 0 0
l:)Q 0 E:) 0
, -...~ "" () ""'I I j
~ \~ \.-1.... -.... _' L
>- ~~ 0 ~ -.9 '
t.:) rI\ ~
- "-
o
~
roo 0 0 0 1
00 t:) 0 0
~ . <:) ~ ~_ C) "":7_ '
~ .01 '-.......0 ~ ",- ~ I
,.... '" "'-.. I.b (tl cs c") 1:-
{ ~ ~~ -
~ .~
- "-
oJ
(~ -~ oJ) 0., 0 0 D
~\ 0 .0 0 C - 0
~ . 0_ "l. ''''') Q...... 'V) I 1
~ ~ \.? V) 0- 0 i:J - ,
:::2. ':): dO ~ ::::: (") "'0
~~
~'u <:) 0 0
"2 ~ g<g 0 ~ CJ I
. ~ Q ..sl ~ -..D_
~ E ~ y,.....sl. v) 00 k- I
\ . "0 (,'\ _ n c:>o
o ""- -.
~
"'2
:i I O.c 0 0 ~
~ ~ 00 (;) 0
<t:.. Q J::- J:- _ <:I k'- _ i
-4J ...; y,- ~- 0 -D ';z- ,
":' &lO rf\ n a) 0- )
)..... -
o
0'0 0 0 cb
"^ 0<:1 0 0
../ .0 '"0 ClO 0 _- QO
(. ",,'" - , - - 0 . J
..,,~,::o "" ~ -.......
&: oo~ ? r'll -
~ --
log
r/J D8 g ~ 0 0- t"'\
-- 0 -)
cr- u- "-
, _...... _ - ,.. c;lo <:"l>
. v.J """ 0 ~ · .0
;;.. J\?:r- ~ 0 --- ~ J
\,J) ~
.
"
~t
-:-) ~ 0 0 0 .g ,.!. ~ ~
a 0.... ~ : 0 ~ t:"': ~ ~ ~
r '" ~ - -.. - C'lS "'- Q
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,
~ ~i""
"-
.' - . JO" 0
~.. . . :s. '9..J '::I a . n ~
_ -J ~"% ....)- a
~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ l' \~ ~- g
Q.. - \- .;.& q;' '" ~ Ii '; ~ ?::- -:. ......:! ~ oo.::r
u 0 ~ -') ~~ ~
~~ v .,
* *=' *' '*
"-~ .v_ '--
~ i:
. . F I HAL REPORT
j SWIMMING POOL FACILITY
i Dublin, Ohio
May 13, 1987
r
; To: Dublin Recreation and Parks Committee
i Willia. Andrews, Chairman
( From: Wandel & Schnell, Architects, inc.
(
i 43 West Long Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
I This report will be divided into three parts. The purpose
I
I
of this report is to give the Recreation and Parks Committee
! a tool to use in determining the ~pe, size and location of
swimming pool to be owned and ope'ated by the municipality.
This report is a summary of work done over the last six
months with the Committee and the Architect.
The Architect has presented several site plans to the
committee that were useful in understanding the scope of the
, project. These plans were not to be conclusive. They.were
to be used as tools to assist the decision process. . .
PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS
Community Size
r Three sizes of communities were considered. The
municipal boundaries, the school district and the
geographic limitations. As this will be a municipal
i pool the boundaries of Dublin were considered as the
population that this pool would serve. The present
population of Dublin is 8000. The future or projected
population is 20000. The population of Dublin was a1so-
considered without the 2700 residents of Muirfield
Village as they have there own pool and may be less.-
likely to use the municipal pool.
i Possibly a more realistic boundary would coincide with
the that of the School Board. These boundaries extend
I into the city of Columbus east of the Scioto River~ ,-
; Using the school bou~daries a population of 35000 is -
i
I
realistic. Of further support to using this population.
is that the City of Columbus has not provided recreation
facilities for swimming in the northwest quadrant of the
coun ty. A negative for using this population is that
the facility will be used by non tax payers. It may be
realistic to assume that Columbus may someday build a
swimming pool in this area.
A third way to gauge the quantity of people who will use
the pool is to evaluate the geography. This method would
take into consideration the difficulty of getting from
Sawmill Road to Coffman Park for example. As the site
is not finalized this method of determining pool usage
was not considered.
FINAL REPORT
May 13, 1987
Page 2
l
To size the swimming pool a population of 12000 was con-
r s1dered. This will allow some growth in the community.
I It also suggests tha t the popul a t1 on served 1 s wi thi n the,.
\ city boundaries. However while the city and school
district grow the pool will be of adequate size to handle
i the present population and some growth.
I
( Type of Swimming Pool
j
The pool can either be designed for competition or rec-
reational swimming. A competitive pool has specially
designed gutters to prevent wave action and most import-
. . . antly has specific minimum depths. The recreational pool. .
considers different capabilities, ages and activities.
Competitive Pool
The summer swimming season is generally swum in metric
! lengths. Therefore the design of the pool needs to be in
i lengths of either 50 or 25 meters. If seri ous competi t- . .
I ion is desired only a 50 meter pool should be considered.
I However a 25 meter pool could also be considered for
i younger ages and as a warm up pool. The 50 and the 25
I meter pools should have eight lanes for racing. The min-
imum depth of a racing course is 42 inches. This allows
enough water for turns.
Recreational Pool
These pools are designed without competition .in mind~
these pools are designed for the water experience. Of
major consideration in a recreational pool is water.
depth and access to the pool. Very shallow water
(12 inches) can be enjoyable to young mothers and there
young children. As the average height of an adult is
fi ve feet ten inches to design a pool with only 60 inch
deep water would mean most of the people would not be
able to, touch bottom without bobbing. As many children
unti 1 they become teenagers do not reach 5 feet the depth
of water needs to considered for there enjoyment. The
pool needs to be designed to various depths so people do
not have to swim or tread water to enjoy the pool.
Diving Pool
In either a recreational or competitive pool diving may
be considered. For municipal pools in this area that are
not committed to competition platform diving should not
be considered. The two most popular diving heights are
one and three meters. These heights allow for some
competition, but are mostly recreational. For reasons of
safety diving boards require a lot of room and therefore
are not as efficient in swimmers per square foot as other -
areas of the pool. However diving bays are usually
considered as an attraction. This is the most costly part
l of a swimming pool because of its depth.
I
( FINAL REPORT
I May 13. 1987
Page 3
f
I
Wading Pool
f This is a pool usually separate from the others for the
use of very young children. The depth will vary from
o inches to 12 inches. Parents also use this pool as
f they supervise there children.
Spray Pool
I These pools are used purely for recreation and provide-
different water experience. The can be used by young
and old. They can designed to simulate standing under a-
! waterfall or walking in a heavy mist. They can be used
as a visual and functional attraction.
Support Facilities
Parking
Parking should be designed for at least 10 percent of
I amount of people during peak attendance. Peak attendance
is a aboQ~ 3Q percent of the potential users or members.
[ This means at some times the lot will be fu 11 . It is
best to try to share a parking facility with another user
such as a school.
l Concessions
This facility provides a designed service for the swim-
mer but it also provides a maintenance issue for the
pool. The location. rules and types of food can min-
imize the trash. The types of food should be considered
as easy to prepare. store and save. Usually a vendor is
consulted for the best items to include on the menu.
Active and Passive Areas
Active games such as basketball and volleyball can be
considered and seem to be natural extensions of swimming
as recreational act i vi ty . Passive areas for sun bathing
and chairs for lounging should be considered. The lawn
areas should be kept away from the water for maintenance
reasons. Different lawn areas should be considered for
different age groups and interests.
I
1 .
r
l FINAL REPORT
May 13, 1987
[ Page 4 4..":
r Bathhouse
Historically bathhouses are places to change clothes.
I Today bathhouses are usually not designed to have attend-
andts who check in and out your street clothes. There
I are several reasons for this, one is economic in the
sense of staff, space and liability and the other is
i social. As a culture it is much more acceptable for us
to drive from home to the pool in our bathing suit.
Without changing facilities the bathhouse becomes the -
entry control poi nt, the place for a first aid area,
the pool office, a place for life guards to relax, pool
storage and toilets for the bathers and staff.
i PROGRAM
I
I The program decided upon by the Committee is to provide
a recreational pool that could be used for some compet- .
itive events. The emphasis would be on recreational with
I consideration of those interested in lap swimming.
The population to be served by this pool would be between.-
8000 and 11000.
i
SWIMMING POOL
i Wading 1200 - 1600 Square Feet
Swimming 6500 - 7500 Square Feet
Diving 1200 - 1600 Square Feet
I' DECK AREA 10000 - 15000 Square Feet
I SUNNING AREA 50000+ Square Feet
I
BATHHOUSE
l Entry (control) 535 Net Square Feet
Office/Records 150
I Guard Room 270
i First Aid 150
I
Pool Storage 300
Toilets 420
Pump Room 450
Concession 600
Total Net Area 2875
Total Gross Area 3740
: PARKING 100 - 150 Cars
,
FINAL REPORT
Hay 13, 1987
! Page 5
i
r COST ESTIMATE
I Swimming Pool $284,800. - $342,400.
.. Deck Area $ 75,000. - $112,500.
,
,
Bathhouse $224,400. - $243,100.
i
i Parking $ 50,000. - $ 75,000.
Landscape $ 50,000. - $ 75,000.
Utili ti es $ 15,000. - $ 15,000.
Contingency @ 5% $ 34,960. - $ 43,150.
Owners Costs @ 10% $ 69,920. $ 86,300.
-
I
I TOTAL $804,080. - $992.450.
,
I
I
I
r
i
i
i
I
. FINAL REPORT
May 13, 1987
I Page 6
I SITE SELECTION
I In considering the location of a municipal pool there were
two major issues. One was that the land be presently owned
I by the City and the other that the site be as central to the
selected population as possible. Added to these two main
I issues was the availability of utilities, topography, access
\ and existing natural features. With the Committee's help
I
the site selection was narrowed to two, Coffman Park and
I Earlington.
I Coffman Park
This is and has been the major developed municipal space in
the city. It has the City Hall, Maintenance Dept., Salt
Shed, Police Station, Historic structures, tennis courts,
picnic grounds, shelter houses and other park amenities.
The land is el shaped with the knuckle congested with the
maintenance facilities. Also in this area is a severe
change in contours and a stream. To develope a pool at
i Coffman Park would require a master plan for the park
I developement and probably some long term commitments to how
, services are to be provided. The construction cost of the
facility may be slightly higher should the master plan
I dictate than the pool be built in an area of topographic
j change.
I Earlington
This is a piece of land bounded on the south by a new
\
street, Earlington and on the north by Brand Road. It is
west of Coffman. The land is flat without distinguishing
characteristics. On this site an elementary school will be
built and parking can be shared. This site is easily
developed for a pool and a master plan has been designed by
Smith Associates.
t..
HEMORANDUM
TO: Dublin Village Council Members
FROM: Jame, F. Olau'en~
DATE: May 12, 1987
Franklin County is proposing to reconstruct the bridge on Dublin Road, just
north of Marion Street. We would like to initiate a cooperative effort with
the County for the replacement of this structure.
Dublin's share of the design costs (roadway and right-of-way only) amount to
$12,648.00 of a total consultant contract amount of approximately $30,000.00.
Construction is tentatively scheduled for spring-summer, 1988. Construction
and right-of-way costs would be appropriated at a later date. There are no
good construction cost estimates currently ava ilab Ie.
Franklin County is requesting this appropriation be passed as an emergency so
that design may begin as soon as possible. Copies of our correspondence with
the County are attached for your information.
JFO: fmu