Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 13-12
RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank. Inc. Ordinance No. 13 -12 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 24.33 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PERIMETER LOOP DRIVE, NORTH OF US 33 /SR 161, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE AND SOUTHWEST OF VENTURE DRIVE FROM PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (EXISTING MAG PLAN AND PERIMETER CENTER, SUBAREA 3 -1) AND PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT (PERIMETER CENTER, SUBAREA D) TO PUD (MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP PUD) TO INCORPORATE 8.73 ACRES INTO THE MAG PUD TO EXPAND THE AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP CAMPUS WITH A 45,000- SQUARE -FOOT BUILDING ADDITION FOR THE BMW AND MINI FRANCHISES. (CASE 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP) Passed 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, 6_ of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2 . The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance there within. Section 3 . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this RZ l day of m2ft . 1 2012. Mayor - P71s lg Officer ATTEST: I Q9 A Ilerk o ouncil II Office of the City Manager 5200 Prkway* City of Dublin Phone: 614 - 1 410.4400 • Fax: --4 4490 1090 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager �— Date: March 8, 2012 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 13 -12 — Rezoning Approximately 24.33 Acres, Located on the East Side of Perimeter Loop Drive, North of US 33 /SR 161, South of Perimeter Drive and Southwest of Venture Drive from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (existing MAG Plan and Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) and PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group PUD) to Incorporate 8.73 Acres into the MAG PUD to Expand the Automobile Dealership Campus with a 45,000- Square -Foot Building Addition for the BMW and Mini Franchises. (Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP) Update Ordinance 13 -12, a request for review and approval of a rezoning with preliminary development plan for 24.33 acres to incorporate 8.73 acres into the MAG PUD to expand the automobile dealership campus was introduced at the February 27, 2012 Council meeting. Council Members agreed that the perimeter buffer screening proposed by the applicant and recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission meets the intent of the Zoning Code requirement and satisfies previous concerns about the visibility along US 33 /SR 161 of vehicles for sale. Council also supported the additional curb cut along Venture Drive as included in the approved Traffic Impact Study and necessitated by the delivery truck route on site. The preliminary development plan has been revised to show the additional Venture Drive curb cut. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application at the January 12, 2012 meeting and recommended approval of the rezoning and preliminary development plan to City Council with the conditions listed below. All conditions, as approved by the Commission, related to the preliminary development plan have been incorporated in this submission. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Conditions 1) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; 2) That the text be revised to permit only one dealership identification sign to serve the entire site; and 3) That the text be revised to require interior signs to be located a minimum of three feet away from any windows or exterior walls. Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan MAG PUD March 8, 2012 Page 2 of 2 Recommendation Based on Council's discussion at the February 27 meeting, Planning recommends approval of Ordinance 13 -12 with the three conditions recommended by Planning & Zoning Commission on January 12, 2012. Office of the City Manager City of Dublin Pho 614 -410.4 0 Fax: - 4490 43017 - 1090 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager`��_ Date: February 23, 2012 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 13 -12 — Rezoning Approximately 24.33 Acres, Located on the East Side of Perimeter Loop Drive, North of US 33 /SR 161, South of Perimeter Drive and Southwest of Venture Drive from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Existing MAG Plan and Perimeter Center, Subarea 3-1) and PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group PUD) to Incorporate 8.73 Acres into the MAG PUD to Expand the Automobile Dealership Campus with a 45,000- Square -Foot Building Addition for the BMW and Mini Franchises. (Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP) Summary Ordinance 13 -12 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning with preliminary development plan for 24.33 acres from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (existing MAG plan and Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) and PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group PUD) to incorporate 8.73 acres into the MAG PUD to expand the automobile dealership campus with a 45,000- square -foot building addition and associated display and parking areas for the BMW and Mini franchises. Background The Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District was originally approved in 1988, encompassing land between Avery- Muirfield Drive and Emerald Parkway, divided into subareas A through M. Permitted uses included commercial, industrial, residential, and office. A 15 -acre Subarea J of the Perimeter Center plan was created in 1998 specifically for automobile dealerships and other uses, with several automotive franchises as a part of the Midwest Auto Group (MAG) campus. Subarea J- 1 of Perimeter Center was established in 2008 to accommodate the temporary relocation of parking for the construction of a building expansion for the MAG campus. In 2010, City Council approved a rezoning with preliminary development plan that removed Subarea J and portions of Subareas D and J -1 from the Perimeter Center PCD and established a new 15.6 -acre MAG PUD for the recently constructed 46,000- square -foot Volvo addition. At the time of the Volvo application, the applicant introduced the concept of a relocated BMW and Mini facility from Post Road to the parcel east of the existing MAG campus. The Planning and Zoning Commission informally reviewed this proposal and agreed the proposed expansion of the MAG campus for BMW and Mini was appropriate, but any remaining land along US 33/ SR 161 to the east should not be considered for automobile dealerships. The Commission complimented the applicant on the proposed architecture and supported the proposed site design. Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan MAG PUD February 23, 2012 Page 2 of 6 Description The site consists of two vacant parcels and one developed parcel (the existing MAG campus). The site has 1,400 feet of frontage along US33 /SR 161; 1,550 feet along Venture Drive and 700 feet along Perimeter Drive. The developed parcel includes two buildings. An approximately 115,500 - square -foot dealership building with several automotive franchises, including the recently added Volvo, is in the southwestern portion of the site. This building also includes the MAG offices, the automobile service area and an executive suite. The second building houses the Land Rover franchise in a 7,335- square -foot building located north toward Perimeter Drive. Customer and employee parking for 404 vehicles and 59,590 square feet of vehicle display area are provided along all sides of the buildings. Vehicle display areas are designed in a unique finger - like arrangement along the western and southern portions of the site. A retention pond is on the north side of the main building at the Perimeter Loop Road entrance. Mature landscaping and significant mounding are along the site perimeter and provide screening for the loading and vehicular use areas. The vacant parcels have no significant topography. Trees along the US33 /SR 161 frontage were removed earlier this year and are being replaced and enhanced with this application. A portion of the vacant site is being used temporarily for stormwater management from the Volvo expansion. Development Text Proposed Development Text Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation for the development requirements noted; the Zoning Code covers all other requirements. The development text typically addresses permitted and conditional uses, setbacks, parking, landscaping, signs and architecture, among other subjects. For administrative purposes, Planning has requested the applicant combine the BMW and Mini site with the existing MAG campus to create a single MAG Planned Unit Development District, thereby removing a portion of Subarea D and all of Subarea J -1 from Perimeter Center. The proposal will create two subareas (A and B), one for the existing MAG campus and one for the new BMW and Mini site. Subarea A is the existing campus and no changes are proposed to that portion of the development text or the site. Use The list of uses is identical for both Subareas and permits the sales and services of new and used automobiles. The applicant is also proposing to permit office and research uses, similar to what is currently permitted in Subarea D of Perimeter Center. The proposed text continues to permit a number of ancillary uses within the primary structure, which includes automobile service, sales of automobile parts and accessories, non - retail coffee shop, and automobile rental services. The proposed rezoning will permit a non - retail car wash, which will be approved with the final development plan application. Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 MAG PUD February 23, 2012 Page 3 of 6 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Density /Lot Coverage /Setbacks The proposed development text does not specify density, so the maximum building site will be determined by parking, setbacks and lot coverage. Code permits up to 70% lot coverage. The pavement and building setbacks text for Subarea B are consistent with the requirements for Subarea A and are as shown in the table. Road /Boundary Setbacks (ft.) Pavement Buildin Venture Drive 25 75 SR161 /US33 60 60 Eastern Boundary 25 25 Parking The text requires parking at one space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, three spaces for each service bay, which is consistent with the requirement for Subarea A. The Code requires one space for every 100 square feet or three spaces per service bay whichever is greater, which results in a far greater number of required spaces. The text permits the lesser of the two requirements, which is consistent with recent approvals for automobile dealerships. Architecture The proposed development text requires "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture." The proposed building addition is intended to create a visual focal point and complement the existing building massing and high - quality architectural design. Permitted building materials include glass, metal, stucco EIFS, stone /stone veneer and concrete masonry units. Tree Preservation Last year, the applicant removed trees along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage that resulted in the need to replace 331 caliper inches. The consolidated stormwater pond will require the removal of additional trees. The applicant is proposing in the text to allow a portion of the replacement trees (limited to 33 %) to be evergreen and ornamental species to increase tree species diversity on the site. Planning supports this proposal, considering the amount of tree replacement inches required. The plans also show off -site replacement on the adjacent vacant parcel to the east, which must be specifically permitted in the development text as Code requires tree replacement to take place on- site. Landscaoing Site landscaping is required to meet Code, except as noted. Code requires a six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161. During the original zoning for the existing MAG campus, the applicant was granted relief from this requirement. Planning has advised the applicant that with this rezoning the property perimeter screening requirement must be met with the development of BMW and Mini site. The proposed text for Subarea B requires a three -foot mound and one tree per 30 lineal feet of frontage along US 33 /SR 161, which is half the height of what Code requires. Along the eastern boundary of the site, the Code - required six -foot mound and one tree per 30 feet is proposed within the development text. Planning cannot support this proposal for screening at only a three- Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan MAG PUD February 23, 2012 Page 4 of 6 foot height, considering previous concerns regarding screening of automobile uses along the highway. Signs The development text for Subarea A has unique sign requirements that identify special sign needs for this campus with the multiple vehicle franchises. The proposed development text follows similar sign requirements for Subarea B, but also exempts logos from any color limitations on all types of signs. The proposed text permits five different types of signs for the MAG campus: campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs. Specific requirements for each sign type are included in the proposed text and are in line with the existing sign requirements. The development text was revised to only allow one sign to identify the dealership as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Stormwater Management The proposal includes a "regional" retention basin that would serve several parcels on the south side of Venture Drive. Traffic Studv The City has approved the Traffic Analysis Study. Preliminary Development Plan Overview A 45,000- square -foot building is proposed in the central portion of the vacant site and is designed to orient both showrooms toward US 33 /SR 161. In front of each showroom is a plaza area for vehicle display. The service function is located toward the rear of the building toward the Venture Drive frontage with an attached carwash, which is not intended for public use. Required setbacks, building height and parking are consistent with the requirements within the proposed development text and the development within Subarea A. Access /Parking The applicant is proposing access off Venture Drive, and the plans show a continuation of the "finger" display design from Subarea A. Parking for customers and employees is concentrated in the eastern portion of the site. Architecture The proposed building elevations continue a modern design as established in Subarea A. The materials are consistent with those used in Subarea A and meet the requirements specified in the proposed development text. Both buildings include showrooms with large portions of glass and will be 26 feet high. Each showroom indicates vehicle display on the second story. The building elevations were revised to eliminate the metal accent bands with bright colors of green, red, and yellow in limited areas, based on concerns raised by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Landscaping The plans indicate extensive landscaping and screening along the customer and employee parking areas and the service areas of the site. The development text requires compliance with the Code's Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan MAG PUD February 23, 2012 Page 5 of 6 landscaping requirements, which are met, with the exception of vehicular use area screening along Venture Drive and property perimeter buffering requirements. Tree Replacement The applicant removed 331 inches of trees along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage and 30 additional inches will be removed for the construction of the consolidated stormwater pond. The plans indicate the replacement of all removed inches throughout the site and along the stormwater pond located on the parcel to the east. Vehicular Use Area Screening As proposed in the text and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the plans show a three -foot mound and one tree per 30 lineal feet of frontage along US 33 /SR 161, which is half the height of what Code requires. Along the eastern boundary of the site, the Code - required six -foot mound and one tree per 30 feet is shown. The applicant has indicated the intent is for these vehicular areas not be visible from any part of the site. Section drawings have been included with this submittal to indicate the height of screening along the vehicular use areas from the freeway. While the sections indicate limited visibility of the vehicular areas, Planning cannot support this proposal for screening at only a three -foot height. Perimeter Buffering Code requires a six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161, which has been incorporated into the landscape plan. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application at the January 12, 2012 meeting and recommended approval of the rezoning and preliminary development plan to City Council with the conditions listed below. The Commission did not agree with Planning staff to require a six -foot mound along Subarea B frontage on US33 /SR 161 and the conditions proposed by Planning regarding this mounding were eliminated from the proposal. All conditions, as approved by the Commission, related to the preliminary development plan have been incorporated in this submission. The applicant has also addressed Conditions 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the final development plan as part of this submission. All other conditions will be required to be met at the building permit stage. Rezonino /Preliminary Development Plan Conditions 1) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; 2) That the text be revised to permit only one dealership identification sign to serve the entire site; and 3) That the text be revised to require interior signs to be located a minimum of three feet away from any windows or exterior walls. Memo re. Ordinance 13 -12 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan MAG PUD February 23, 2012 Page 6 of 6 Final Development Plan Conditions 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; 5) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; 7) That the exterior building finish materials be revised to match what is used in Subarea A; 8) That a fountain and aerator be incorporated into the eastern portion of the decorative pond and an aerator be incorporated into the east stormwater management pond to provide sufficient aeration; and 9) That the applicant work with Planning to field- verify the installation of the proposed junipers along the north side of the decorative pond Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 13 -12 at the second reading /public hearing on March 12, 2012 with the following condition: 1) That the text and plans be revised to require /indicate a six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161. 11- 049Z /P DP /F DP N ' City of Dublin Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan n Land Use and Perimeter Center, Subareas D and J -1, N Long Range Planning Midwestern Auto Group PUD EEEEEEE==== Feet MAG BMW & Mini -Venture Drive 0 200 400 February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153 232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shiet-Ri igs Rived DLbiin. Onio 4331 6 -1 236 Phonc / "DD 614 410.4600 Fox. 614.410.4747 Web S:'e w dubhn oh ,is ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) ® Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) © Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) ❑ Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.115) ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment ❑ Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 6335 Pe rimetr Loop Dri Venture Drive Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): 273-011297/011297/008212 Parcel Size(s) (Acres): 14.78± acres 5.001± acres 5.009± acres Existing Land Use/Development: Existing automobile dealerships and vacant land IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use /Development: Add two (2) new automobile dealerships to the site to compliment the existing dealerships. Total acres affected by application: 24.79± acres III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER Name (individual or Organization) Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) I: Please attach additional sheets if needed. CAR MAG Park LLC and BrenttAnger Real Estate Co. LLC 8270 Greensboro Dr. 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Suite 950 McLean, VA 22102 Daytime Telephone: 889 -2571 Email or Alternate Contact Information Tim Galli— MAG Fax: 793 -7963 SEP 2 9 2011 - Ff3p / CITY OF DUBLIN Page t ofF I COPY LAND USE LONG RANGE PLANNING r1 IV. APPLICANT(S) This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Midwestern Auto Group Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Applicant is also property owner: yes ® no[] Mailing Address: 6335 Perimeter Loop Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 889 - 2571 Email or Alternate Contact Information Tim Galli Fax: 793 -7963 V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: This is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Ben W. Hale, Jr. & Jackson B. Reynolds, III Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Smith & Hale LLC Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 Daytime Telephone: 221 -4255 Fax: 221 -4409 Email or Alternate Contact Information: jreynolds@smithandhale.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. I Tim Galli, Executive Vice President , the owner, hereby authorize Ben W. Hale, Jr. and Jackson B. Reynolds, III to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: ' Date: ❑ Check this box if the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representative(s) is attached as a separate document Subscribed nd swprn before me this _ day of 20 1 K.;p Pp�IAL SF State of _ 1! l l _ _ p fl County of I Notary Public teofOh10 • o M C( Ex 12/20/2014 VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site by�i representat are essential to process this application. The Owner /Applicant, as noted below, hereby author! yep entatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. c= •1 g I Jackson B Reynolds, III the ow rid-repr "Ota' ve au City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described �Ap t�o)r Signature of applicant or authorized representativ . 1�� e f CI I y T FIL LONG Rl�tis:�' — r I 0 � W l Ell VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and /or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said OwnerlApplicant. Jackson B. Reynolds, III the owner or authorized representative . acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: / / � . r1 /, / I Date: _1 // I IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized. I Jackson B. Reynolds, III , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects truUnd correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. I Signature of applicant or authorized representative: ( i / 47Date: 7123111 I Subscribed and sworn to before me this State of DaZ , County of V 1.11 l t Notary Public Nate C. MINI" Notary Pubk S7it8 of Ohio Commission B#= 0 *2015 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received Y Application No: _ P Date(s): (� t 2 P&Z Action: A r,awk& 1 Receipt No: 2 7/f q, Map Zone: 7 Date Received: _ I , 6 Received By: t� City Council (First Reading): 2 . 2 - 12. City Council (Second Reading): 1 2- - 1 2 City Council Action: Ordinance Number: Type of Request: fZCZOin�in W K,�iY�n�rGt -c �JVP.�c7- E, W (Circle) Side of N,�S1E, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: llll P W1 i r was Alk Distance from Nearest Intersection: -7 t PIU UUPY Existing Zoning District: D e �G Requested Zoning District: �� a Pou Page 3of3 CII Y 0, i USL LONG RANGE P /l -0gMMP day of,, j - f 20 M1 i MAG Rezoning Statement (A) The proposed automobile dealerships will abut existing dealerships owned by the applicant/owner, so the use is in keeping with an established development pattern along SR 161 /US 33 and Venture Road. The area is zoned general commercial and the future land use plan designates the site as general commercial so the automobile dealerships are an appropriate use as the existing dealerships have been through the rezoning process and approved by the appropriate bodies. The street system has been designated for commercial use and a traffic study has been performed for the proposed dealerships and all existing traffic circulation criteria has been met and no addition improvements are needed at this time. The community facilities, open space systems and other public improvement have already been programmed and are in place at this time. (B) The proposed auto dealership complements existing dealerships abutting the site that are owned by the owner /applicant. The development pattern has been established by previously approved rezoning to the west of the site. The frontage along SR 161/33 is very advantageous to automobile dealerships and the owner /applicant is taking this opportunity to expand its operations on the proposed site and continue to bring upscale products to the City of Dublin. (C) The Dublin Community Plan shows the subject site as a general office area. The proposed automobile dealership is a change from the Community Plan but the use has been established by previous actions of both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The introduction of the two (2) new dealerships is consistent with the existing dealerships established to the west of the subject site. Although the site is not being developed with general office uses the proposed automobile dealership has been established along the SRI 61/33 right of way and the use has benefited the community by bringing in commercial traffic gild tax dollars in the City. (D) See attached list (E) There has been no rezoning application submitted for these properties within the last 12 months. mag- rezoning.ste (not) (2) 9/26/11 F:Docs Preliminary Development Plan Approval Criteria BMW & Mini Site Venture Drive 1. The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Zoning Code. The proposed development plan is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code as there are a munber of car dealerships to the west of the site that have been approved by the Planning Commission. The proposed development plan is consistent with the standards approved for the existing dealerships therefore this proposal is simply an extension of those that operate today in the City of Dublin. 2. The proposed development is in conformity with Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan, and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network. Yes, the proposed development conforms with the Thoroughfare, Bikeway and other adopted plans and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network. However, the Community Plan calls for general office in the subject area but the proposed expansion of the existing automobile dealership is in keeping with what has been approved by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council so the alteration to the Community Plan has previously been approved. The submitted traffic study showed that the proposed automobile dealerships would decrease the amount of traffic than originally programmed for the adjacent city street system when the area was programmed for general commercial activities so the submitted development will be in conformance with all applicable plans. 3. The proposed development advances the general welfare of the city and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas. Yes, the proposed development will advance the general welfare of the community and will not impede the normal and orderly development in the area. The proposed development will bring jobs to the community as well as lines of automobiles that will be available to the members of the community. The existing dealerships to the west have shown that the inclusion of these types of commercial activities fit well with the community and provide amenities that one in Dublin would normally have to seek outside the area to purchase or take advantage of the automotive related services. 4. The proposed uses are appropriately located in the city so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded. Yes, the automobile dealerships are appropriately located as they will abut a number of existing dealerships. The high caliper nature of the proposed dealership will help safeguard the value of the surrounding properties as the existing dealerships have worked to create the high character within the area as evidenced by the continued high quality of nearby developments including the Children's Hospital location. 5. Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan. Not Applicable 6. The proposed development respects the unique characteristics of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site. The site is flat, undeveloped faun land that has no unique natural features nor natural resources. However the development of the site will bring some topography, landscaping and water to the site will help to enhance the look of the existing site. 7, Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided. Yes, adequate utilities, roads, drainage and all other facilities will be provided with the development of this property. 8. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non- conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Yes, adequate measures have been taken to minimize traffic congestion on surrounding streets as the traffic study prepared for the site indicates that the am /pm peak are less than what was originally programmed under the Community Plan (General Commercial), The development of the site will accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic and attempt to minimize any potential conflicts. 9. The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community. Yes, the buildings are being constructed to maintain the proper coordination and integration as the owner /applicant owns the property to the west and the structure proposed within this development plan is being designed to complement those existing buildings which abut the subject site. The proposed buildings will maintain the high integrity found in Dublin and will complement the brand of vehicles that will be sold on site as well as those being sold under the umbrella of the abutting dealerships. Only the highest quality of materials will go into the construction of the building and in the installation of the landscaping that will buffer the site, 10. The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yardspoce, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of'the development plan contribute to the orderly development of land within the city. Yes, the building and parking layout have been planned to coordinate with the existing dealerships to the west to create a design that is orderly and contributes to a pleasing aesthetic layout towards both SR 161 [US 33 and Venture Drive. 11. Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas. Yes, the design of the site provides for two retention ponds that will serve both the subject property and the vacant property to the east. The owner /applicant owns the parcel to the east and in anticipation of future development of that site is engineering the size of the easternmost pond to handle the stormwater drainage off that site when built in the future. The site will use pervious parking surfaces and other on site detention methods to mitigate the amount off site run off as possible. 12. The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations. Yes, the development standards requested in this application mimic that which was requested in previous submittals. The only deviation is the request for a Brand Identification Sign along SR161 /US 33 to identify the two (2) new dealerships located on the subject property. The owner /applicant feels that the signage is necessary to identify the site and that the dealerships are stand alone entities above and beyond those dealerships existing to the west. 13. The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the city. Yes, the architecture of the building will complement the existing architecture found to the west as the desire is to be different from that existing architecture but maintain the feel and quality that has been established by the existing developments. The design of the building and the landscaping will maintain or exceed the community standards set for the City of Dublin. 14. The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development. The proposed new dealerships will fit into the existing infrastructure established on the area as the road, water and sewer systems are already in place. The stormwater retention component will be developed in conjunction with the building construction so the site will ultimately fit seamlessly with the surrounding developments. 15. The proposed development can be adequately services by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area. Yes, the proposed development can be served with the existing public service systems as they have to be sized and constructed with general commercial types of uses in mind when the area was initially developed. 16. The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent ,pith the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. Yes, the existing road system was planned and constructed with similar developments in mind so there are no issues with the use of thoroughfares as a traffic study has been submitted with this Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan application and tentative approval has been rendered on behalf of the City Engineering Department, mag.ste (net) (1) 9/26/11 F:Docs DESCRIPTION OF AN 8.733 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING ALONG VENTURE DRIVE, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey 2999 and being 8.733 acres, comprised of a portion of a 5.099 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200906170087819, the remaining 0.0401 acres of an original 5.500 tract conveyed to Brentlinger Real Estate, LLC by Instrument Number 20403150056068 and part of a 4.600 acre tract conveyed to Brentlinger Real Estate Company LLC by Instrument Number 200411020252709 (all deed and plat references being to the Franklin County Recorder's Office) and bounded and described as follows: Beginning for reference on the south right -of -way line of Venture Drive at the northernmost corner of said 5.099 acre tract; Thence along the southwest right -of -way line of Venture Drive with a curve to the left with a radius of 330.00 feet, delta of 08 °24'51 ", arc length of 48.46 feet, a chord distance of 48.42 feet and a bearing of South 54 0 31'42" East to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along the south right -of -way line of Venture Drive also being the north line of said 5.099 acre tract with a curve to the left with a radius of 330.00 feet, delta of 30 °32'16 ", arc length of 175.89 feet, a chord distance of 173.81 feet and a chord bearing of South 74 °00'25" East to a point of tangent; Thence continuing along the south right -of -way line of Venture Drive also being the north line of said 5.099 acre tract and continuing along the north line of said 0.401 acre tract at 196.85 feet and continuing along the north line of said 4.600 acre tract at 234.44 feet South 89 °16'34" East for a total distance of 641.11 feet to a point; Thence leaving the south right -of -way line of Venture Drive South 05 °19'22" West for a distance of 469.28 feet a point on the north Limited Access right -of -way line of U.S. 33 and State Route 161 also being the south line of said 4.600 acre tract; Thence along the north Limited Access right -of -way line of U.S. 33 and State Route 161 also being the south line of said 4.600 acre tract North 88 °10'50" West for a distance of 144.25 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the north Limited Access right -of -way line of U.S. 33 and State Route 161 also being the south line of said 4.600 acre tract and continuing along the south line of said 0.401 acre tract at 224.82 feet and continuing along the south line of said 5.099 acre tract at 262.41 feet North 89 °16'23" West for a total distance of 667.56 feet to a point; Thence North 05 °16'15" East for a distance of 512.36 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Comprised of 4.186 acres of the 5.099 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200906170087819, PID 273 - 012294 -80; the remaining 0.401 acres of an original 5.500 tract conveyed to Brentlinger Real Estate, LLC by Instrument Number 20403150056068 and 4.146 acres of the 4.600 acre tract conveyed to Brentlinger Real Estate Company, LLC by Instrument Number 200411020252709, PID 273 - 011297 -00. Containing 8.733 acres total, more or less. This description is based on records on file at the Franklin County Recorder's Office and information provided by Architectural Alliance and NOT based on a boundary survey. Basis of Bearings is from the west line of the 5.099 acre tract as described in Instrument Number 200906170087819. 4M /I �Ofis ®� 0 e ! 0 F MARK �• o E. * CAMERON o .•p 7395 0� o� •�OisTE�F,• ���oo July 29, 2011 Mark E. Cameron P.S. 7395 Date N89 0 16'23 " W 137 .5 9' 224.82' N88 0'50"W 667.56 144.25' US 33 & STATE ROUTE 33 LIMITED ACCESS R/W VARIES EXHIBIT OF A 8.733 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey 2999 Based on records on file at the Franklin County Recorder's Office and information provided by Architectural Alliance and NOT based on a boundary survey. Basis of Bearings is from the west line of the 5.099 acre tract as described in Instrument Number 200906170087819. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 100 50 0 100 1" =100' Nt S SANDS POINT OF REFERENCE halho - - — — - - to N D NORTH CORNER OF DECKER ` � -- -- -- -- -- 5.099 ACRE TRACT - -- ��i E PID 273 - 012294 -80 JA .. _ Venture Drive (60' R/W) N89 °1 6'34 "W Radius: 330.00' 196.85' 37.59' 641.11' Delta: 0874'51" Arc Length: 48.46' POINT OF Radius: 330.00' Chord length 48.42' BEGINNING Delta: 30 °32'16" Chord Bearing: S54'31'42 "E Arc Length: 175.89' Chord length: 173.81' Chord bearing: S74 0 00 1 25 "E CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. C" Instr. 200906170087819 o N 5.099 Acres Brentlinger Real Estate Company, LLC a N ;° N PID 273 - 012294 -80 Instr. 200411020252709 3 C14 � M c 4.600 Acres N co 04 N Z PID 273 - 011297 -00 r ,C-4, Z_ U c d o g L V y Brentlinger Real Estate Company, LLC Instr. 200403150056068 0.401 Acres (Remaining) PID 273 - 011297 -00 , N89 0 16'23 " W 137 .5 9' 224.82' N88 0'50"W 667.56 144.25' US 33 & STATE ROUTE 33 LIMITED ACCESS R/W VARIES EXHIBIT OF A 8.733 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey 2999 Based on records on file at the Franklin County Recorder's Office and information provided by Architectural Alliance and NOT based on a boundary survey. Basis of Bearings is from the west line of the 5.099 acre tract as described in Instrument Number 200906170087819. NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 100 50 0 100 1" =100' Nt S SANDS halho to N D DECKER CPS J ��i E JA .. ENGINEERS■SURVE OF �I 0// C MARK o ' * E. CAMERON •& 7395 or 0 '�c�STff- moo, S • ii 111' July 29, 2011 MARK E. CAMERON PS 7395 DATE 397 WEST FRONT ST LOGAN, Ox 43138 740 - 385 -2140 FAX: 740-385-0491 1495 OLD HENDERSON RU COLUMBUS, Ox 43220 614 - 459 -6992 FAX: 614-459-6987 TOLL FREE: 866 - 277 -0600 507 MAIN STREET, SurrE 203 ZANEsvrLLE, Ox 43701 740 - 450 -1640 FAX: 740-450-1641 SHEET 1 of 1 DESCRIPTION OF A 15.550 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING WEST OF VENTURE DRIVE, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey 2999 and being 15.550 acres, comprised of the 14.638 acre remaining portion of a 14.780 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200205010109358 and a 0.912 acre part of a 5.099 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200906170087819 (all deed and plat references being to the Franklin County Recorder's Office) and bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a'' /<" I.D. iron pipe found at the south end of a curve connecting the east right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop (60 feet in width) and the south right -of -way line of Perimeter Drive (80' R /W) as shown in the Dedication of Venture Drive in Plat Book 89, Page 43 also being a corner of the south line of a 0.142 acre Right -of -Way Take in Instrument 201007010082837; Thence along the south line of said Right -of -Way Take North 40 °45'30" East for a distance of 28.28 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the south line of said Right -of -Way Take North 85 °45'30" East for a distance of 603.51 feet to a point on a right -of -way line connecting the south right - of -way line of Perimeter Drive with the west right -of -way line of Venture Drive; Thence continuing along the south line of said right -of -way line South 47 °12'24" East for a distance of 30.24 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the west right -of -way line of Venture Drive a curve to the right having a radius of 220.00 feet, a delta angle of 21 °24'42 ", a chord bearing of South 10 0 32'03" West, a chord of 81.74 feet and an arc length of 82.21 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the west right -of -way of Venture Drive South 21 °14'24" West for a distance of 156.04 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the west right -of -way of Venture Drive with a curve to the left with a radius of 330.00 feet, a delta angle of 79 °58'39 ", a chord bearing of South 18 0 44'56" East, a chord of 424.14 feet and an arc length of 460.64 feet to a point; Thence leaving the south right -of -way line of Venture Drive on a new line across a 5.099 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. in Instrument Number 200906170087819 South 05 °16'15" West for a distance of 512.36 feet to a point on the south line of said CAR MAG PARK 5.099 acre tract also being the north right -of -way line of US Route 33 and SR 161; Thence along the north right -of -way line of US Route 33 and SR 161 North 89 °16'34" West for a distance of 560.00 feet to a point being a southwest corner of said 14.638 acre tract; Thence continuing along the north right -of -way of US 33 and SR 161 North 57 °33'10" West for a distance of 24.72 feet to a point; Thence continuing along the north right -of -way line of US 33 and SR 161 North 89 °16'34" West for a distance of 30.11 feet to a point; Thence along the centerline of Wilcox Road /Perimeter Loop Road North 04'16'30 West for a distance of 122.47 feet to a point; Thence leaving the centerline of Wilcox Road /Perimeter Road on the south line of Wilcox Road as dedicated in Plat Book 85, Page 51 South 89 °16'34" East for a distance of 30.11 feet to a point; Thence along the east right -of -way line of Wilcox Road as dedicated in Plat Book 85, Page 51 North 04 °14'14" West for a distance of 952.29 feet to TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Comprised of the remaining 14.638 acre remaining portion of a 14.780 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200205010109358 PID 273 - 008212 and a 0.912 acre part of a 5.099 acre tract conveyed to CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. by Instrument Number 200906170087819, PID 273 - 012294. Containing 15.550 acres total, more or less. This description is based on records on file at the Franklin County Recorder's Office and information provided by Architectural Alliance and NOT based on a boundary survey. Basis of Bearings is from the west line of the 5.099 acre tract as described in Instrument Number 200906170087819. �Xelz �e o F 0 ti �0 .• MARK o * E. o CAMERON • p 7395 0 O. IT F � s � e October 3, 2011 Mark E. Cameron P.S. 7395 Date VARIES) — L --- Perime Drive ( R/W� - - — I „ L2 L1 I F s p I I A I 1 P A I S I I 1 I 1 3 I I � o IO 1 I a31 I tt r N o 'I� 0 On I �zl I � 1 a I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 N85 °45 30 � C1 DINT OF BEGINNING. OUTH END OF CURVE T INTERSECTION OF� ERIMETER LOOP ROAD ND PERIMETER DRIVE. y H / EE PB 89, PG 43 1 1 � I I`° I �c \ C2 T_ CAR MAG LLC. Instr. 200205010109358 14.648 Acres by Auditor o PIN 273 - 008212 N CS U3 14.638 acres ccI N89 0 16'34 "W CAR MAG PARK LLC. Instr. 200906170087819 5.099 Acres PID 273 - 012294 US 33 & STATE ROUTE 161 LIMITED ACCESS R1W VARIES EXHIBIT OF A 15.550 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey 2999 Based on records on file at the Franklin County Recorder's Office and information provided by Architectural Alliance and NOT based on a boundary survey. Basis of Bearings is from the west line of the 5.099 acre tract as described in Instrument Number 200906170087819. CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS A ANGLE CH BRG CH L LENGTH C1 220' 21'24'42" S10'32'03 "W 81.74' 82.21' C2 330' 79'58'39" S18'44'56 "E 424.14' 460.64' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L1 N40'45'30 "E 28.28' L2 S47'1 2'24 "E 30.24' L3 N57'33'1 0 "W 24.72' L4 N89'16'34 "W 30.11' L5 S89'16'34 "E 30.11' NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 200 100 0 200 1" =200' 0' 0 F �� �� ..., Oy - ,44 c MARK ••�0 * E. .*. CAMERON •� 7395 0, •F- /STE�F.. moo, IL • • ! S ff:�_4 October 3, 2011 MARK E. CAMERON PS 7395 DATE SANDS DECKER CPS / 397 WEST FRONT ST LOGAN, Ox 43138 740 - 385 -2140 FAx:740- 385 -0491 1495 OLD HENDERsoN RU COLUMBUS, Ox 43220 614 - 459 -6992 FAx:614- 459 -6987 TOLL FREE: 866 - 277 -0600 507 MAIN STREET, SurrE 203 ZANEsvrLLE, Ox 43701 740 - 450 -1640 FAX: 740-450-1641 SHEET 1 of 1 BOR Associates LLC 5860 Venture Drive LLC 5870 Venture Drive LLC 5850 Venture Dr. Ste A 6042 Quin Abbey Ct. E c/o ECS Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 5870 Venture Dr. Ste C DBD 6000 Venture LLC AHF Management Corp Dublin, OH 43017 5880 Venture Properties RJCM Biondi LLC Nationwide Childrens Hospital 5880 Venture Dr. Ste D 8400 Industrial PKWY PO Box 7200 Dublin, OH 43017 Plain City, OH 43064 Columbus, OH 43205 -2664 Realty Income Properties Venture Drive Partners 6329 Perimeter Loop LLC 8LLC 5920 Venture Dr. Ste 200 155 Green Meadows Dr. S 600 La Terraza Blvd. Dublin, OH 43017 Lewis Center, OH 43035 Escondido, CA 92025 Columbus, OH 43201 Hawkins Family Partnership Sherrie G. Rindenour Tom Whiteside Auto Sales c/o Dwayne Hawkins 6051 Perimeter Dr. PO Box 253 600134 th St. N Dublin, OH 43017 Mt. Sterling, OH 43143 St. Petersburg, FL 33714 Mount Carmel Health System Ohio Central Credit Union Brad Parish 6150 E Broad St. 6033 Perimeter Dr. Architectural Alliance 3 rd Floor Dublin, OH 43017 165 North 5 Avenue Columbus, OH 43213 -1574 Columbus, OH 43123 Double Tee Realty Inc Tri Ventures LLC Waldron Investments LLC 5900 Venture Dr. Ste D 1430 Collins Rd. NW 6042 Quin Abbey Ct. E Dublin, OH 43017 Lancaster, OH 43130 Dublin, OH 43017 DBD 6000 Venture LLC AHF Management Corp Guy Investment Co. LTD 6000 Venture Dr. 5920 Venture Dr. 5810 Shier Rings Rd. Ste A Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 True To Form Consolidated Biomedical Lab. Inc Collision Repair PO Box 2230 The Ohio State University 5853 Galaxy Pkwy. Ste E Burlington, NC 27216 Real Estate Property Management Cleveland, OH 44128 53 W. 11 Avenue Columbus, OH 43201 Discovery MC Investments Roche Biomedical Labs. Inc. 7007 Discovery Blvd. PO Box 2230 MSKB LLC Dublin, OH 43017 Burlington, NC 27216 5970 Venture Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 Suzette Nemeth Anne C. Clark Carl W and Kay L Karrer 6690 Heatherstone Loop 6706 Heatherstone Loop 6746 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 CAR MAG LLC John S. Sanders Ben W. Hale, Jr. 1420 Spring Hill Road #525 5820 Shier Rings Road Smith & Hale LLC McLean, VA 22102 Dublin, OH 43017 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725 Columbus, OH 43215 Brentlinger Real Estate Co LLC Linda J. Snow Joanne M Fogelsong 6335 Perimeter Loop Road 6603 Heatherstone Circle 6609 Heatherstone Circle Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Gerald P. Ferguson Anmarie Watson David D Simkins TR and 6601 Heatherstone Circle 6602 Heatherstone Loop Patricia C Simkins TR Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 6610 Heatherstone LP Dublin, OH 43017 Joshua L. Morrow John Fitzgerald Diane Bleimes 6611 Heatherstone Circle 6617 Heatherstone Circle 6625 Heatherstone Circle Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 John D. Kelly Jr. Kellie J. Jaramillo Ruth M. Martin 6633 Heatherstone Circle 6641 Heatherstone Circle 6618 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Brian T. Ewing Rismo Gualtieri Mary M. Decker 6626 Heatherstone Loop 6634 Heatherstone Loop 6642 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Ronald L. McLanahan Sandra K. Deaner Leah Rocci 6650 Heatherstone Loop 6658 Heatherstone Loop 6666 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Katherine S. Jones 6674 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Shirley and Robert Roy 6682 Heatherstone Loop Dublin, OH 43017 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Mag mag- dublin.lbl(clh) 9 /21 /11F:docs /s &hlabels /2011 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP (MAG) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) CAMPUS SUMMARY This application contains Subareas A & B which reflects the existing and proposed MAG sales campus. Subarea A contains approximately 15.69± acres of the developed automobile sales campus including the latest addition, originally approved in . Subarea B adds 8.73± acres, currently located in Subareas J -1 and D of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District to the MAG dealership campus for a total of 24.42 ± acres upon final build out (MAG Planned Unit Development District). Subarea B will contain a new automobile sales building, repairs facility, ancillary parking and other amenities for additional dealership franchises. The addition of new dealerships will complement the high quality dealerships abutting the subject site to the west. The goal is to provide a unified campus thru the use of similar architecture, signage and landscaping that will provide a unique sales facility in central Ohio. The addition of the dealership will increase the tax base for the City as well as provide additional skilled jobs that helps to support the community. The completed automobile sales campus located along the SR 33/161 right -of -way will provide an attractive entrance way into the City of Dublin and provide a draw of customers to the community shopping for high end cars. SUBAREA A L Summary The subject site consists of 15.69± acres of real property bounded by Perimeter Drive to the north, U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161 to the south, Perimeter Loop Road to the west, and Venture Drive to the northeast. It currently contains an existing automobile dealership on 14.78± acres as well as a portion (0.91± acres) of an undeveloped parcel just to the east. The applicant is seeking to add additional square footage to the east end of its existing facility in order to accommodate its Volvo automobile franchise that will be relocated from another municipality. This expansion also will create new office space for the operations of the entire dealership. This PUD will permit the same uses and same development standards as are currently applicable to the property while making accommodations for the expansion of the dealership. IL Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT III. Permitted Uses (A) The following uses shall be permitted in the PUD: (1) New and used automobile sales and service (2) General, administrative, and business office (3) Medical and dental office (4) Research, synthesis, analysis, development, and testing laboratories (5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or service uses including, without limitation: (i) Automobile service (but not including auto body work) (ii) Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories (iii) Non - retail, coffee shops selling beverages and snack food items for on- premises consumption (iv) Automobile rental services (6) One executive suite providing a single residential suite and related office space for the automobile dealership. (7) Detached non - retail car wash operated in association with automobile sales and /or service facilities, provided that it shall be used only by employees of the dealership in conjunction with sales and /or services to customers. This car wash also shall be permitted to serve an automobile dealership located on the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD should such development occur. IV. Setback and Yard Requirements (A) Venture Drive: The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) Perimeter Drive: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 65 feet for buildings. (C) State Route 161/U.S. Route 33: The minimum setback from the State Route 161/U. S. Route 33 right -of -way shall be 60 feet for pavement and buildings. (D) Perimeter Loop Road: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (D) Eastern Boundary: For all portions of the eastern boundary line of this PUD that are not adjacent to Venture Drive, there shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of 25 feet as measured from the eastern boundary line. In the event that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD is rezoned to allow an automobile dealership use, then there shall be a zero setback requirement for both buildings and pavement from the eastern boundary line of this PUD. (E) Interior Property Lines: There shall be no minimum setback requirements from interior property lines within this PUD. V. Parking, Loading, and Stacking Requirements (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this site shall be calculated as follows: (1) Parking for automobile dealership uses shall provide parking at the rate of 1 space per 300 square feet of building floor area for sales and related office uses, per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. A single parking space shall be required to serve the executive suite. (2) Parking for uses other than what is accounted for in Section V(A)(1) of this text shall be provided in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. (B) Employee Parking: Parking for employees of any permitted user shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 16 VU.S. Route 33. (C) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 16 VU.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights -of -way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. (D) Loading Docks: Loading docks shall be fully screened from the view of adjacent rights -of -way and properties and shall be integrated into the architecture of the buildings. (E) Car Wash Stacking: There shall be no minimum automobile stacking requirement for the non - retail car wash. VL Architecture (A) Building Height: The maximum height for the car wash shall be 25 feet and for all PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT other structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. (B) Design Intent: Existing architecture in this subarea is modern and innovative and features the extensive use of glass and metal to promote transparency and a sleek, signature look across the front of the buildings while emphasizing sharp edges and angles. The buildings are positioned to run parallel to and follow a crescent - shaped access drive that outlines the campus. The expansion of the larger building is to occur on its east side and is intended to create a visual focal point by enhancing the massing of the structure when compared to what currently exists on the property. The expansion of the building will implement a high quality of finish consistent with the architectural style and materials that are found throughout the property. (C) Plans: Architecture shall reflect the general design and character of the architectural drawings that accompany the preliminary development plan application. (D) Permitted Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, EIFS, stone /stone veneer and concrete masonry units (CMU). (E) Roofs: Flat roofs shall be permitted in this PUD. Metal roofs may be found on visible low -slope conditions and membrane roofing on flat roofs that are not visible to the public. VII. Landscaping and Screening (A) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscape Code unless otherwise specified herein. (B) Property Perimeter Screening: Along U. S. Route 33 /State Route 161, the site shall be required to provide an average of one tree per 40 feet of lineal frontage to meet the intent of the arterial screening requirement and shall be exempt from the 6 -foot tall continuous screening requirement, as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. (C) Display Space: An automobile dealership shall be permitted to display automobiles along a maximum of 40% of its property's lineal street frontage. (D) Eastern Perimeter Buffer: It is anticipated that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD will develop relatively shortly after this application is approved. Therefore, the property perimeter buffering requirements of the Dublin Zoning Code shall be waived along the eastern boundary of this PUD. In the event that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD has not developed with a use that is compatible with an automobile dealership on or before the first anniversary of the effective date of the approval of the preliminary development plan for this PUD, then a plan showing the 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT details of the proposed buffering to be installed along the eastern boundary line of this PUD and adherence to the perimeter buffering requirements of the Dublin Zoning Code shall be submitted and installed by the applicant, subject to approval by Planning. (E) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. (F) Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. (G) Mechanicals: All roof - mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights -of -way adjacent to the site. VIII. Signs (A) Design Intent: This site is unique in that it has frontage on four separate public roads and utilizes three widely dispersed vehicular access points, creating a need for a comprehensive sign plan. The current approved sign package for this site recognizes the development of the property with a campus -like feel and accomplishes the goals of providing identification of the various automobile manufacturers offering vehicles for sale on the site, identifying the dealership itself, and providing ample directional signage to allow customers and visitors to identify sales and service areas for different product types. The intent behind the sign standards in this text is to continue to utilize this same package while maintaining some limited flexibility to accommodate future changes to manufacturer types. (B) Alteration of Signs: Sign panels on the campus identification, directional and brand signs that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be changed without further review by the Planning and Zoning Commission provided that verification of the new panel's conformance with this text is made through the sign permitting process, or as otherwise specified herein. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For purposes of this text, signs shall be placed into one of five categories, for which separate standards are set forth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (2) Dealership identification signs (3) Directional signs (4) Brand signs (5) Wall signs PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (D) Standards Applicable to All Sign Types: The following standards shall apply to all signs in the PUD, regardless of how they are categorized: (1) Materials: All signs shall consist of materials that are complimentary to and of a similar quality as the buildings found in this PUD. (2) Interior Signs: Signs located on the interior of buildings shall be permitted provided that they are not more than 3 feet in height and are not readily visible from rights -of -way that are adjacent to the site. (3) Illumination: All signs found on the outside of buildings shall be externally illuminated, except for campus identification signs, which may be internally illuminated. (4) Prohibited signs and displays: The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings: (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions (b) Painting or other types of surface graphics displaying prices, slogans, or other advertising, except (i) as included on informational stickers provided by the manufacturer and (ii) a two -digit graphic shall be permitted on the windshield of used cars to indicate the year the car was made, provided that such graphic does not exceed 5 inches by 6 inches in size. (c) Logos and/or signs located on the interior of a building that is easily readable from an adjacent public right -of -way shall not be permitted without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission (E) Campus Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. (2) Number: A maximum of two campus identification signs shall be permitted. 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the site entrances into the PUD from Perimeter Loop Road and another shall be permitted to the southeast of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Venture Drive. (4) Overall Size: Each campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on -site. (6) Sign Area: Sign panels identifying automobile manufacturers shall be no greater than 1.5 square feet in area The portion of the sign identifying the name of the automobile dealership shall not exceed 5.5 square feet in area (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (8) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to utilize three colors. (F) Dealership Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: 1. Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "dealership identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 161/U. S Route 33 and /or a wall sign located at the building's main office entrance that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealership that is operating within the PUD. 2. Number: A maximum of one dealership identification sign shall be permitted for both Subarea A and B it shall be located on Subarea B. If either dealership in Subarea A and B is sold to a separate auto dealership then the new owner has the right to request a new monument dealership sign to identify two new dealerships through an amended final development plan process. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 16VUS Route 33 frontage and one wall shall be permitted at the entrance to building's main office. (4) Overall Height: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 46 inches in height and a maximum of 32 inches in width. The wall sign shall be a maximum of 7 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 15 feet in height, as measured from grade. (5) Content: The dealership identification sign shall identify the name of the automobile dealership. No logos or identification of an automobile manufacturer shall be permitted. (6) Sign Area: The maximum area of the sign face for the ground sign shall be 17 square feet. The maximum area of the wall sign shall be 21 square feet. (7) Any modifications to the location of the dealership identification ground sign greater than 10 feet from the existing location or the movement of the wall sign to a location visible from an adjacent right -of -way shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (G) Directional Signs: The following standards shall apply to directional signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign used for the purpose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right -of -way. (3) Size: Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inches in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square feet (H) Brand Signs: The following standards shall apply to branding signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fagade of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the building. (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (3) Size: Brand signs shall be permitted with the following size limitations: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (a) Sign Type A (such as signs labeled K, L, N and O): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. (b) Sign Type B (such as sign labeled M): If multiple brands are identified at the same entrance, the overall sign may exceed 20 square feet in area, but each individual brand sign shall be limited to 6 square feet in area. The overall height shall not exceed 40 inches. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and /or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the sign face. (5) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. (1) Wall Signs: The following standards shall apply to wall signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "wall sign" shall be defined to have the same meaning as provided in the Dublin Zoning Code. (2) Number & Location: One wall sign shall be permitted in this PUD, located on the north fagade of the northernmost building in this PUD. This sign shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. (3) Height: Wall signs shall not exceed 25 feet in height. (4) Sign Area: Each wall sign shall not exceed a maximum area of 35 square feet. (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitted on the wall sign. IX. Lighting (A) Lighting for this campus shall be consistent in look and feel throughout the PUD. (B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development plan, lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin City Code. (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 400 watt lamps. 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (D) Lighting poles and fixtures shall be consistent in color and appearance throughout the site and shall be dark in color and constructed of dark brown, black, or bronze metal. (E) External lighting shall utilize cut-off type fixtures. (F) Cut - off type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. No color lights shall be permitted to illuminate the exterior of a building. (G) All lights shall be arranged to minimize light trespass onto adjacent properties. (H) Lighting of the dealership after business hours shall be of a low intensity. Interior lighting in showrooms during these hours shall be subdued so that the full interior is not illuminated. Highlighting of specific cars during these hours shall be permitted. SUBAREA B L Summary The subject site consists of 8.73± acres of real property bounded by the existing MAG dealership to the west, U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161 to the south, and Venture Drive to the north and vacant property to the east. The property is current undeveloped and the applicant/owner is seeking to add additional dealership space to the existing array currently operating to the west of Subarea A. The site will be developed with a new vehicle sales and service building and the necessary ancillary parking and landscaping. The request is expanding a permitted use found in the adopted area plan and the submittal will complete the automobile sales campus as envisioned by the applicant /owner. The adjacent property to the east owned by the applicant/owner remains zoned for office use under the existing PUD. The proposal will be to extend the landscaping elements east on the subject site to create a unified theme for the larger development. This PUD will permit the same uses and same development standards as are currently applicable to the property to the east while making accommodations for the expansion of the dealership. The rezoning of this site will take the ground out of the Perimeter Center Planned District Subareas D and J -1. IL Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. III. Permitted Uses 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (A) The following uses shall be permitted in the PUD: (1) New and used automobile sales and service (2) General, administrative, and business office (3) Medical and dental office (4) Research, synthesis, analysis, development, and testing laboratories (5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or service uses including, without limitation: (v) Automobile service (but not including auto body work) (vi) Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories (vii) Non - retail, coffee shops selling beverages and snack food items for on- premises consumption (viii) Automobile rental services (6) Non - retail car wash for the sole purpose of serving the users and/ or customers of a permitted automobile service facility located in this subarea or Subarea A (or the users and/or customers of an automobile dealership associated with such a facility) IV. Setback and Yard Requirements (A) Venture Drive: 'The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) State Route 161/U.S. Route 33: The minimum setback from the State Route 161/U. S. Route 33 right -of -way shall be 60 feet for pavement and buildings. (C) Eastern Boundary: There shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of 25 feet as measured from the eastern boundary line. (D) Interior Property Lines: There shall be no minimum setback requirements from interior property lines within this PUD. V. Parking, Loading, and Stacking Requirements (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this site shall be calculated as follows: (1) Parking for automobile dealership uses shall provide parking at the rate of 1 11 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT space per 300 square feet of building floor area for sales and related office uses, 1 per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. (2) Parking for uses other than what is accounted for in Section V(A)(1) of this text shall be provided in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. (B) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 16VU.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights -of -way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. (C) Loading Docks: Loading docks shall be fully screened from the view of adjacent rights -of -way and properties and shall be integrated into the architecture of the buildings. (D) Car Wash Stacking: There shall be no minimum automobile stacking requirement for the non - retail car wash. VI. Architecture (A) Building Height: The maximum height for all structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. (B) Design Intent: Existing architecture in Subarea A is contemporary and innovative and features the extensive use of glass and metal to promote transparency and a sleek, signature look across the front of the buildings while emphasizing sharp edges and angles. The new facility will continue the contemporary style and employ the use of glass and black/white metal to highlight each brand. The new building will be positioned parallel to State Route 16 VU. S. Route 33 and Venture Drive and provide a visual presence along both roads. Automobiles may be placed in various window areas to provide additional venues to display products that are sold on the premises. The new facility will implement a high quality of finish consistent with the architectural style and materials that are found throughout this area (C) Plans: Architecture shall reflect the general design and character of the architectural drawings that accompany the preliminary development plan application. (D) Permitted Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, cast in place concrete, EIFS /stucco, stone /stone veneer and concrete masonry units (CMU). (E) Roofs: Flat roofs shall be permitted in this PUD. 12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (F) Colors: Limited areas of bold colors shall be permitted on the buildings to provide architectural highlights. VII. Landscaping and Screening (A) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscape Code unless otherwise specified herein. (B) Property Perimeter Screening: Along U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161, the site shall be required to meet the Zoning Code by providing a minimum 10 -foot wide, 3 -foot tall mound from the pond in an easterly direction to the easterly property line and one tree per 30 feet of lineal frontage to meet the freeway /arterial screening requirement as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. In addition, the property perimeter will continue the formal grove design approved and installed along Subarea A. (C) Tree Replacement and Diversity Allowances: Tree replacement for both Subareas A & B may be varied to increase the diversity of tree species on the total campus area by allowing up to 33% of the replacement trees to be evergreen or ornamental trees (no pines). A 7' or 8' high evergreen tree will count similar to a 2.5" caliper deciduous tree. An 8' to 10' high evergreen is equal to a 3" deciduous tree. The final landscaping design will include evergreen trees of varying heights from 6' to 10'. Evergreen trees that are used to satisfy the tree replacement requirement may be used to supplement the buffering of service areas, loading sites and service structures. Replacement trees may not be used in place of other trees providing specific landscaping requirement. Replacement trees for Subareas A and B may be planted on the adjacent property to the east as it is owned by the same developer /owner of the automobile sale facility. (D) Eastern Perimeter Buffer: The 6 -foot tall mound with trees every 30 feet will be extended easterly on the adjacent property and then continued down to the Children's Hospital property line. (E) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. (F) Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. (G) Mechanicals: All roof - mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights -of -way adjacent to the site. 13 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT VIII. Signs (A) Design Intent: This site is unique in that it has frontage on two separate public roads and utilizes two widely dispersed vehicular access points, creating a need for a comprehensive sign plan. The current approved sign package for Subarea A recognizes the development of the property with a campus -like feel and accomplishes the goals of providing identification of the various automobile manufacturers offering vehicles for sale on the site, identifying the dealership itself, and providing directional signage to allow customers and visitors to identify sales and service areas for different product types. The intent behind the sign standards in this text is to continue to utilize this same package while maintaining some limited flexibility to accommodate future changes to manufacturer types. (B) Alteration of Signs: Sign panel modifications that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be reviewed and approved administratively provided that the new panels conform to this text. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For purposes of this text, signs shall be placed into one of four categories, for which separate standards are set forth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (2) Dealer identification sign (3) Directional signs (4) Wall signs (5) Brand signs (D) Standards Applicable to All Sign Types: The following standards shall apply to all signs in the PUD, regardless of how they are categorized: (1) Materials: All signs shall consist of materials that are complimentary to and of a similar quality as the buildings found in this PUD. (2) Interior: Logos and /or signs located on the interior of a building shall be permitted without requiring approval if the signage is not internally illuminated and shall be located a minimum of three (3) feet away from any window or exterior walls. (3) Illumination: Signs may be externally or internally illuminated (4) Prohibited signs and displays: The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings: 14 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions (b) Painting or other types of surface graphics displaying prices, slogans, or other advertising, except (i) as included on informational stickers provided by the manufacturer and (ii) a two -digit graphic shall be permitted on the windshield of used cars to indicate the year the car was made, provided that such graphic does not exceed 5 inches by 6 inches in size. (E) Campus Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. (2) Number: A maximum of one campus identification signs shall be permitted. (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the Venture Drive right of way. (4) Overall Size: The campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels on each side for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on -site. (6) Sign Area: Sign panels identifying automobile manufacturers shall be no greater than 1.5 square feet in area The portion of the sign identifying the name of the automobile dealership shall not exceed 5.5 square feet in area (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (8) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to utilize three colors. If vehicle or brand logos are incorporated into the sign panel, they shall be exempted from color limitations. 15 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (F) Dealer Identification Sian: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "Dealer identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 161/U. S Route 33 that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealerships that operates within the PUD. (2) Number: One dealership identification sign shall be permitted for Subarea A and Subarea B and it shall be located on Subarea B. If either dealership in Subarea A and B is sold to a separate auto dealership then the new owner has the right to request a new monument dealership sign to identify two new dealerships through an amended final development plan process. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 161 /US Route 33 frontage in Subarea B. (4) Overall Size: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 10 feet in height and a maximum of 50 square feet in size. (5) Landscaping: If the ground sign is incorporated within the pond along US 33 /SR 161, no landscaping shall be required around the base of the sign. (G) Directional Signs: The following standards shall apply to directional signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign used for the purpose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right -of -way. (3) Size: Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inches in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square feet (H) Wall Signs: The following standards shall apply to wall signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "wall sign" shall be defined to have the same meaning as provided in the Dublin Zoning Code. (2) Number: Location: Two wall signs shall be permitted in this PUD. These 16 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT signs shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. (3) Height: Wall signs shall not exceed 15 feet in height. (4) Sign Area: Each wall sign shall not exceed a maximum area of 50 square feet. (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitted on the wall sign. Logos shall be excepted from color restrictions. (1) Brand Signs: The following standards shall apply to branding signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fagade of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the building. (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (3) Size: Brand signs shall be permitted with the following size limitations: (a) Sign Type A (such as signs labeled K, L, N and O): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and /or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the sign face. (5) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. IX. Lighting (A) Lighting for this campus shall be consistent in look and feel throughout the PUD. (B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development plan, lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin City Code. 17 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 400 watt lamps. (D) Lighting poles and fixtures shall be consistent in color and appearance throughout the site and shall be dark in color and constructed of dark brown, black, or bronze metal. (E) External lighting shall utilize cut-off type fixtures. (F) Cut -off type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. No color lights shall be permitted to illuminate the exterior of a building. (G) All lights shall be arranged to minimize light trespass onto adjacent properties. (H) Lighting of the dealership after business hours shall be of a low intensity. Interior lighting in showrooms during these hours shall be subdued so that the full interior is not illuminated. Highlighting of specific cars during these hours shall be permitted. MAG- 201 1.txt (net) (1) 2/9/12 F:Does /s &htexts/2011 18 SHEET INDEX NO. I SHEET TITLE ' i l l ' i l l 1H 1 0.00 COVER SHEET .01 OVERALL SITE PLAN E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 .02 ISITE PLAN 0 0 13 .03 REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP 3.01 FIR5T FLOOR PLAN 3.02 ISCCOND FLOOR PLAN 4.01 IBUILDINO ELEVATIONS COLOR ELEVATIONS LP -0 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 LP -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 0 13 LP -2 LANDSCAPE PLAN LP -3 SITE SECTION L0-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS TP —I TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN Midwestern Auto Group Dublin, Ohio BMW 9 MINI SHOWROOM Combined Pre iminary Development Plan / Rezoning 9 Finna SL -1.01 SITE LIGHTING PLAN E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 SL —I.O2 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS 0 0 13 SL -1.03 SITE LIGHTING PLAN — PHOTOMETRICS SL -1.04 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS CI COVER SHEET E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 C2.1 GENERAL NOTES 0 0 13 C2.2 SITE DETAILS C3 SITE DEMOLITION & VEHICLE ACCESS PLAN C4.1 SITE STAKING PLAN C4.2 SITE STAKING PLAN C5.1 SITE UTILITY PLAN C5.2 SITE UTILITY PLAN C6.1 151TE GRADING PLAN C6.2 517E GRADING PLAN C7.1 STORM PROFILES C8.1 51TE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C8.2 SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS C9 TRIBUTARY AREA MAP SUI.I EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 51J1.2 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY Development Plan 7 1 Nn TH FIFTH STMEET COOLII�./1511S OHIO ??1: ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE CIVIL ENGINEER SAND DECKER CPS ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 1495 Old Henderson Rd. Columbus, Ohio 43220 t + 614 459 6992 f + 614 459 6987 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN -IT STUDIOS, MECHANICAL ENGINEER MCMULLEN LLC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 1589 Newcomer Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 t + 614 505 1270 f + 614 340 4624 100 South State Street Westerville, Ohio 43081 t + 614 895 9408 f + 614 895 9450 Project Number Drawing Set COMBINED PDP / REZONING & FDP Drawing 17 Rezonino/PDP t7 Informal P&Z MAC DEALER IDENTIFICATION E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 0 BRAND SIGNS 0 0 13 DIRECTIONAL SERVICE SIGNS CAMPUS IDENTIFICATION BMW WALL SIGN MINI WALL SIGN Development Plan 7 1 Nn TH FIFTH STMEET COOLII�./1511S OHIO ??1: ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE CIVIL ENGINEER SAND DECKER CPS ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 1495 Old Henderson Rd. Columbus, Ohio 43220 t + 614 459 6992 f + 614 459 6987 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN -IT STUDIOS, MECHANICAL ENGINEER MCMULLEN LLC ENGINEERING CO., INC. 1589 Newcomer Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 t + 614 505 1270 f + 614 340 4624 100 South State Street Westerville, Ohio 43081 t + 614 895 9408 f + 614 895 9450 Project Number Drawing Set COMBINED PDP / REZONING & FDP Drawing 17 Rezonino/PDP t7 Informal P&Z 08/01117 09/19111 E3 PDP/Rezonino & FDP 0929111 i] r Pa ori.� 12/22/11 U 0lYWUN0L81WM& 2/3/12 0 0 0 13 m <y b� I ' - — �PER(Af�DR DRIYD� � I r / �_ w / -. -- I QI � 0 YW - P .a I A m�% m b .Jr �f V 4y a , rN a • .0 I Y I 1 � a \ v 1 o kq � 4915 DBUY l`07 � paG1AY �� — I -- MTK MrG M" IXWAIM 9009 10 • WiM Qaq � m IN I \\ I BUILDING AREAS: LANDROVER BLDG: 1,335 S.F_ MAIN MAG BLDG: 68,585 SP_ VOLVO ADDITION: 46.834 Sr-. Tota 1: 122,154 S.F. REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS: LANDROVER BLDG BUSINESS 3315/300 =1125 = 12 SERVICE BAYS 1 +3 =21 DISPLAY AREA 41.351/1000 = 41.16 42 TOTAL: 15 SPACES MAIN MAG BLDG BUSINESS 50,112 /300 =110 SERVICE BAYS 49.3 =141 DISPLAY AREA 55,455/1000 = 56 RESIDENTIAL 10310 = 2 per dwell unit TOTAL: 315 SPACES TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 450 PAR<ING SPACES PROVIDED: 404 SPACES NUMBER OF SERVICE BAYS: 56 STALLS TOTAL PAR<ING PROVIDED: 460 9 HANDICAPPED SPACES ON SITE LOT COVERAGE: TOTAL SITE = 619,818 SF_ (15.6 ACRES) REQUIRED GREEN SPACE (MIN_ 30% OF SITE) a 203094 SF_ ACTUAL GREEN SPACE = 248,110 SF. (36.6% OF TOTAL SITE) TOTAL OUTDOOR DISPLAY SPACE AREA: 96,806 SF AM ♦— ♦ Q BUILDING AREAS- BMW/MINI BUILDING: 40,900 SF FUTURE SERVICE ADDITION: 3,830 SF (8 SERVICE BAYS) REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS: BMW # MINI BUILDING BUSINESS: 18 ,312/300 = 62 SERVICE: 21 + (8 FUTURE) = 29 • 3 =81 DISPLAY AREA: 58,984/1000 = 59 TOTAL REQUIRED PAR<ING: 208 PARING SPACES PROVIDED: 196 SPACES NUMBER OF SERVICE BAYS: 29 STALLS TOTAL PARING PROVIDED: 225 5 HANDICAPPED SPACES ON SITE LOT COVERAGE: TOTAL SITE = 380,448 SF. (8.13 ACRES) REQUIRED GREEN SPACE (MIN. 309- OF SITE) = 114,134 SF. ACTUAL GREEN SPACE = 151,365 SF. (39.1% OF TOTAL SITE) FUTURE 8 SERVICE EXPANSION WILL REMOVE 2,415 SF OF GREENSPACE. 148,890 SF (39.1% OF TOTAL SITE) TOTAL OUTDOOR DISPLAY SPACE AREA: 58,984 SF s Site Plan SCALE I" = 80' -0" NOTE: ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN INCLUDED FOR GENERAL REFERENCE ONLY - REFER TO CIVIL DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL SITE LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL PLANTING LOCATIONS AND SPECIES W J Is C 6 � z o A I \ _ _ CIApn _ _ __ __ _ _ oavlAr Pan 77 • I • �� • Vx - �_, - -_ _. - �., '...� x '�_ H • lc`. is - ._ {'.. ,— •— ,_,— •— ,_•— ,— ,_.— ._. —. —. - C I _ � I �� T I• " I� r� J y . �wr ✓ t • ti��� � �Y� �•� y W , w ell a a _.. �► i I �. ti � �• a iAE WI IA y / • - W � y � i � z� i I \ ✓ i '� � I .. w - •u4 a� - I l e �. C . —`�( oar �•v ,,,J' ✓ � sum 1 �✓ _ _ • �= , � , .... �S � ` � �� �d�� .5ae� � �'\ �Y / � .`^ , \� w - MMR ----�� /� ... - „�. h.. "^�. ^ r.--. / � • -r '� ..e_ ,l r -- L y , •� r I c r J _ C _ l F — __ - - — ... w w 1 • 9 C ° ° • I • ..`I ( ��� I /' �l I •r"C s"� ^ e"" { :r•c �l/ �� ` — I c , UNWA110N Ta! 4 CaY.RnE WALL ��"` 'v,,,,✓ -_ —� __ - ,i(_ S w, ,/ - - J \ J I F • J l • 1 [ 1 • I i . z i r '� , I I COLUMBUS - MARYSVILLE RD I COLUMBUS - MARYSVILLE RD I COLUMBUS - MARYSVILLE RD I COLUMBUS - MARYSVILLE RD CL D Z F- LU V) W ZW 7 0 • L L 7 C Ln N 00 Ln Draw ngs 0 RezonlnplPDP 08/01111 0 Informal P&Z 09/19111 D m n oP,.m 09/29111 0 Pros W=M 12/22111 ■ awr msimew 2(3/12 UR u I( Project Number A09_009 a d Sheet Thle OVERALL SITE MA ELK PLAN Sheet Number io 1.0 COLUMBUS- M4RYSVILL� RD a a la i I i i CL Z) O _� Z D � Q LU W m w M� 0 �L 0 L 7 C u1 N W Xn Site Plan _° SCALE I" = 40' -0" C0LUM5US- M,4RYSVILLE RD NOTE- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN INCLUDED FOR GENERAL SITE LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS_ REFER TO LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL PLANTING LOCATIONS AND SPECIES Drawings - -- 0 RamninNPDP 08101/11 0 Informal P&Z 09119/11 0 Pm rn ,.N 09129/11 0 Pros oP �m 12/2011 ■ rmr msim�w 2M12 �nE€ e Project Number A09_009 Sheet Thle SITE PLAN � m Sheet Number 1.02 PROPERTY INFORMATION Parcel No. 273 - 0011297 BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE CO LLC 6335 PERIMETER LOOP RD DUBLIN OH 43017 8.73 Acres r � g NEEMENE z m Drawings Z) O (7 O Q Z LU LU O C 0 �L 7 C Ln N 00 Ln 0 RamninNPDP 08/01111 0 Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 09/29111 0 a"o o.,a®n,. 12122111 ■ cm. a„w aemru 2IN12 C z W� Fg p q g 8 Project Number A09_009 a d Sheet Thle _g 3 REGIONAL � E8 CONTEXT MAP �r� Sheet Number 1.03 I I SLOPE DN 0 DETA AREA 18J BMW (w BML \ TOOL STORAI i' AIR /OIL r PARTS / MGR I I I DOCK RECEIVING rL WAIL FlARRI� IBMW ( ` a �� { n 1 J I DIM431O u CAPE/BOUTIQUE � r BMW PARTS COUNTER L MINI PARTS COUNTER L 1 IST FLOOR AREA L J BMW L w N r Es TOTAL FLOOR BUILDING AREA: L -1 LL I j I ENTRANCE IZ z SERVICE f �Q f NL wen J tl e L I' BREAKROOM � w �Q �Q W J I L � I I I MECHANICAL _Z 3 a m MGR \ \ STORAGE o S ala I N ® I � LU I IU Q I � I I I i o[,01 I Q Q CARWA6H EQUIPMENT ROOM z t .. FUTURE 6 BAY EXPANS L -L- � L 7- � L 7- � L L --L L L —L L LL —L L MINI PARTS COUNTER L 1 IST FLOOR AREA L J BMW L w N r Es TOTAL FLOOR BUILDING AREA: L -1 LL I j I ENTRANCE {� �7 Ail O L SERVICE f �Q f NL wen � tl e L I' BREAKROOM � w �Q �Q W (U BMW (13) BMW (2) BMW (14) BMW (3) BMW (4) BMW (IS) BMW h (16) BMW h � I • C6) BMW (T) BMW I (20) SERVICE BAYS PLUG (1) ALIGNMENT RACK I (1101- (P) BMW GLASS WALL L-T-- I 09/19111 IST FLOOR AREA 32,269 sf BMW 8,631 sf TOTAL FLOOR BUILDING AREA: BMW \j FUTURE SERVICE ADDITION: j I ENTRANCE WORKROOM I SERVICE �Q I Q,m W J I L � I I I MECHANICAL _Z ROOM MGR \ \ STORAGE S I I � I IU Q I � I I I I BMW ENTRANCE LL (8) BMW (9) BMW (1) MINI (10) BMW (3) MINI h � MINI ENTRANCE (4) MINI h � (2) MINI (s) MINI h � (6) MINI h c ¢ I c- ^.a r 1 / I� gal �� � �I eta M �Ma L-T L� ILI FUTURE 8 BAY EXPANSION MI I ! WOI i i O O MINI - ✓ �. SERVICE MGR � -- - --- -- ____ NNW CAR I O DELIvERY uu O E: I C O O O 0 OYlNIOM! UP MINI �♦ SERVICE 77< WRITE -UP C) 1 J L I I7/ �euara�e c� D DI L Y 1 4I� G - LOUI,IIG� 11 LIB MII�11 Bour 3 n � 3 Mirvi rv[xi C )C )I FINE HlSigiT FINE SOSEIY MINI 1 SHOWR + + + + + + J --F -1 L� �-1 E O � �I � IS* 0 d ) - BMW SERVICE WRITE -UP 966 S* F IRS I T B FLOOR PLAN A Z� O D Lij W m w r � L 7 0 �L ' s ` C Ln N 00 Ln Draw ngs 0 Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 0 Informal PBZ 09/19111 IST FLOOR AREA 32,269 sf 2ND FLOOR AREA 8,631 sf TOTAL FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 40,900 sf FUTURE SERVICE ADDITION: 3,830 sf (8 SERVILE BAYS) --F -1 L� �-1 E O � �I � IS* 0 d ) - BMW SERVICE WRITE -UP 966 S* F IRS I T B FLOOR PLAN A Z� O D Lij W m w r � L 7 0 �L ' s ` C Ln N 00 Ln Draw ngs 0 Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 0 Informal PBZ 09/19111 0 M M ,.N 09/29111 0 P oP, 12/22111 ❑ rmr ms,m.w 2012 �n E 7{ Project Number A09_009 a # Sheet Thle FIRST FLOOR PLAN Sheet Number 3.01 � 5 FUTURE T BAY EXPANSION i i g a g Ifl I � FUTURE T BAY EXPANSION J MEMEMEM Z K m Drawings CL Z) ( O V O Q Z LU LU O 7 0 a� �L 7 C Ln N 00 u1 0 RamninNPDP 08101/11 0 Informal P&Z 09119/11 0 MM ,.N 09129/11 0 aP= W=b 12 22/11 ❑ 2/3/12 N e 0 r — i n om] LL E EL �d Project Number A09_009 Sheet Thle SECOND FLOOR PLAN Sheet Number 3.02 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL - PARAMT COLOR: WHITE PARAMT PAR� PAR� BI _n2) BMW BRAND 510TAne CURTAINWAI-1- SYSTEM BY KAWNEER OR EQUAL - CLEAR ANODIZED W/ CLEAR GLASS ILDING ELEVATION IL DING 1 1- fl e IT' STUCCO ALUMINUM COMP05ITC METAL iTj NQ TCXTUPC WHITE STUCCO COLOR-- BLACK GREY STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING COLOR: BLACK CLEAR ANODIZED W/ CLEAR CLASS PARAPET - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - IEEE... - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ewe, Iwlomnn� IMIME m iii ® ®� =min --- ------- mill ME ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL EXPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE CMU SMOOTH FACE STOREFRONT SYSTEM BY KAWNEEP OR EQUAL - COLOR: WHITE CONCRETE- COLOR: DARK COLOR CLEAR ANODIZED W/ CLEAR GLASS INTEGRAL COLOR V = V-01. ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL COLOR: WHITE n WHITE STUCCO N CURTAINWALL SYSTEM BY KAWNEEP OR EQUAL - MATCH EXISTING TEXTURE WHITE STUCCO ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL STOREFRONT SYSTEM BY KAWNEEP OR EQUAL MATCH EXISTING TIXTUPE COLOR: BLACK CLEAR ANODIZED W/ CLEAR CLASS PARAPET - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - mill ME ---------------- ------ --------------- - - --------------- -------------------------------- ---------------- ------------------ -------- V = V-01. ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL COLOR: WHITE n WHITE STUCCO N CURTAINWALL SYSTEM BY KAWNEEP OR EQUAL - MATCH EXISTING TEXTURE GREY STUCCO TO ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL COLOR: WHITE L ---------------- 4 I KEYPLAN W Ac NTS E CL D 0 IMMOM Z 0 z LU LU ME V, Ln C14 00 Ln Drawings 0 Rennina/PDP 08101/11 E3 Informal P&Z 09119/11 13 Wa%,� 09129/11 E3 WWMP�1= 12/22/11 ❑ ma,.,a e,m 2/3/12 W q ; 1 Project N.1ba, A09 Sheet Title E- 3 BUILDING Ef ELEVATIONS IL Sheet Number 4001 SITE EVATION k��j SCALE 1'-0" _ -0 WHITE STUCCO ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL STOREFRONT SYSTEM BY KAWNEEP OR EQUAL MATCH EXISTING TIXTUPE COLOR: BLACK CLEAR ANODIZED W/ CLEAR CLASS PARAPET - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - ..... �� 1 9 ��i ! 1 1 - -- ------ -- -- -- M, M, --------------------------------------------- -- -- -- --------- - ------------------------------------------------------------- --- -------------------------------------------------- - ---------------------------------------------- - -- -- ---------------------------------- oil A - OWNS hh main ® ®� = 1 i =�1= ====== = = = = == == = = =. ---------------- III. . UN I • O GREY STUCCO TO ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL COLOR: WHITE L ---------------- 4 I KEYPLAN W Ac NTS E CL D 0 IMMOM Z 0 z LU LU ME V, Ln C14 00 Ln Drawings 0 Rennina/PDP 08101/11 E3 Informal P&Z 09119/11 13 Wa%,� 09129/11 E3 WWMP�1= 12/22/11 ❑ ma,.,a e,m 2/3/12 W q ; 1 Project N.1ba, A09 Sheet Title E- 3 BUILDING Ef ELEVATIONS IL Sheet Number 4001 SITE EVATION k��j SCALE 1'-0" _ -0 .. .1t J6� Q UVILV IIVV CLCY P111VIV \ \�� SCALE 1/16" = 1'4" Z L m CL D 0 _ V O O� D Q � W Lu > W all BUILDI,NG ELEVATION Aw Drewin9s ❑ RezoninylPDP 08101111 O Informal PBZ 09119111 E3 o ° w ° : iA.,..,. 09129111 ■ 0 1922111 O 1 Projeul Number i " Sheet Me P I! BUILDING ELEVATIONS Sheet Number s : 4.01 SITE_ELEVATION BUILDING ELEVATION I 2 w � w L L U) 07 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 D 0 . 0 L Ln cV 00 Ln U J W � O N 0 V N N E 0 0 a fA � bl N Z a v Z�Emm gg o d � U 3 y N 9 Drawings 0 Rezoning /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 0 PQ onina 09/29/11 0 R DPa°oPia a tno e tlma 12/22/11 0 City Council 02/03/12 Project Number 011 -018 _ Sheet Title OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet Number #C LP -0 CL Z) O Z �Q oc � w mw 0 3F Seal D 0 . 0 L Ln cV 00 Ln U J W � O N 0 V N N E 0 0 a fA � bl N Z a v Z�Emm gg o d � U 3 y N 9 Drawings 0 Rezoning /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 0 PQ onina 09/29/11 0 R DPa°oPia a tno e tlma 12/22/11 0 City Council 02/03/12 Project Number 011 -018 _ Sheet Title OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN Sheet Number #C LP -0 V \ 1 -UF VUA -175sf + \ \\ I k k VUA -330sf x + 2 -UF I II II � Transplanted Tree Number 51 Transplanted Tree Numb 7 Transplanted Trees Numbers 15 -22 Transplanted Tree Number 9 Transplanted Tree Number 8 _Transplanted Trees Numbers 23 -28 � (V J U) CL 0 Z LJJ m LU 0 37 ■ 7 Q N . L 7 1-) C N Ln cV W Ln Seal ,r U J W � O N 0 V N N E x a F Uo fA � bl N Z E Z��mm gg o d � U 3 y N 9 il ` I/ Shrubs counts (8) are included on Sheet LP -2 Drawings 0 Rezoninq /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 0 P 171'11fl onin, 09/29/11 0 R DP ID a �o e tln, 12/22/11 ■ City Council 02/03/12 Project Number a 11 011 -018 instal roposed Pond. Locations to be &4ermnedwt final engineering drawings drawings for details. i (V C L J - - - - - - - - — - - — - — - - - - - - - - - - — - — _ _ _ _ _. 1 6 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 Sheet Title ` LANDSCAPE 9 PLAN Sheet Number #C LP -1 J N N L U) Z E m Seal CL Z) O� ( LL V O Q Z W LU 0 3F U J W � O N 0 V N N E 0 0 a F Ooh fA � bl N Z E Z��mm gg o d � U 3 y N 9 Drawings O C 7 Q (3) . L (3) Ln cV 00 Ln 0 Rezoning /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 0 p 171'11f, —nina 09/29/11 0 R DPa°oPia a tno e tlma 12/22/11 0 City Council 02/03/12 Project Number 4 1 31 011 -018 Sheet Title i r I� NORTH U) SCALE IN FEET U) 1 0 30 60 LANDSCAPE I PLAN al l Sheet Number � LP -2 3.5' High Vegetative 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 911 910 909 908 907 906 905 904 903 902 901 900 899 898 897 896 895 894 893 892 891 890 889 888 887 886 885 884 883 882 882 SECTION 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 12 24 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 911 910 909 908 907 906 905 904 903 902 901 900 899 898 897 896 895 894 893 892 891 890 889 888 887 886 885 884 883 882 Z E E m 1L Z) O � ) V O Z W LU V 0 Seal 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 911 910 909 908 Route 33 923 922 921 Water Feature - Water Elevation 914.0 Cast -in Place Wall - See ( ' Architectural drawings for details. J >, F — Campus Identification 0 Sign o= I Perimeter Screening Roadway 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 911 SECTION 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 Sidewalk Parking Entry Plaza New Building 923 922 921 920 919 918 917 916 915 914 913 912 = 911 910 909 908 907 SECTION 3 SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 J W � O N 0 V N N �Ex a Ooh fA � bl N Z a � v Z�Emm gg o d � U 3 N Drawings 2 O D Q . L D \ (3) Ln r4 00 Ln 0 Rezoninq /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 0 PoPa —nma 09/29/11 0 R a°oPia 12/22/11 0 City Council 02/03/12 rn I I: —L nl —..-. ...:aL T___ n__..— I__ __ Project Number 011 -018 _ Sheet Title Ic SITE SECTIONS y� Sheet Number � LP -3 rn I I: —L nl —..-. ...:aL T___ n__..— I__ __ NEVER CUT LEADER. THIN UP TO 1/3 OF BRANCHES RETAINING NATURAL SH/ OF TREE. DO NOT LEAVE STUBS SET TOP OF ROOT FLARE 4" ABOVE FINI: CUT ALL BINDING AND REMOVE WRAPPII TOP OF BALL 2" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED 4" DIA. X 4" SAUCER AROUND PLANTING I BED PREPARATION 3/4 PARTS TOPSOIL EXISTING 1/4 PARTS ORGANIC MATERIAL LOOSEN SUBGRADE AROUND CENTER N AND INSTALL SAND AS NEEDED TO PROM ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND AERATION UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE BASE DETAIL GENERAL TREE PLANTING STAKING SEE PLANT LIST FOR SPACING B" FROM EDGE OF PLANTING BED .�J DEEP - SHREDDED H HARDWOOD BARK k� L MULCH -III; 2" DEEP -PEAT MOSS INCORPORATED INTO 6" OF TOPSOIL 12" DEPTH PREPARED BED WITH TOPSOIL FERTILIZE PER NOTES DETAIL GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL NOTES 1. CONSULT PLANT SCHEDULE FOR PLANT SIZES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT ADJUSTMENT OF PLANT LOCATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANTS DRAWN ON PLANS. PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. 4. ALL SHRUB AND GROUND COVER BEDS (EXISTING AND NEW) TO BE MULCHED WITH A MINIMUM OF 3 INCHES OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A FULL 1 YEAR GUARANTEE ON ALL PLANTS INSTALLED AND PROVIDE COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON ALL WORK DONE BEGINNING ON THE DAY OF APPROVAL FROM OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND CONTINUING FOR A THREE MONTH DURATION AT WHICH TIME OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL DECLARE JOB ACCEPTANCE. 6. EACH PLANTING TO BE FREE FROM DISEASE, INSECT INFESTATION AND MECHANICAL INJURIES AND, IN ALL RESPECTS, BE READY FOR FIELD PLANTING. 7. ALL PLANTS TO CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERYMEN STOCK (ANSI -Z60.1 -2004) IN REGARDS TO SIZING, GROWING AND B &B SPECIFICATIONS. 8A. PLANTING HOLES TO BE DUG A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE WIDTH AND 6 -8 INCHES DEEPER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL OF BOTH SHRUB AND TREE AND TO BE AMENDED WITH ORGANIC SOIL CONDITIONER. (I.E. NATURES HELPER OR PRO MIX). 8B. IN AREAS WHERE BEDROCK OR HEAVILY COMPACTED ROCK FILL IS ENCOUNTERED, THE PLANTING HOLES ARE TO BE DUG TO A MINIMUM OF THREE TIMES THE WIDTH AND ONE FOOT DEEPER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT ADJUSTMENT OF PLANT LOCATIONS. 9. EXISTING GRASS TO BE REMOVED, IF PRESENT, AND TOPSOIL TO BE SPREAD SMOOTH AND HAND -RAKED TO REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAT 1 INCH IN DIAMETER PRIOR TO LAYING SOD OR SEEDING. 10. ALL CHANGES TO DESIGN OR PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TO BE AUTHORIZED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 11. TOPSOIL MIX TO BE 3 PARTS SCREENED TOPSOIL AND 1 PART ORGANIC MATERIAL. (I.E. NATURE'S HELPER OR PRO MIX). AVATE HOLE 12" LARGER N ROOT BALL RIFY SIDES OF HOLE SH GRADE SET TOP OF RC MASS1"ABOVE FINISH GRADE SPADE EDGE REMOVE CONTAINER OR TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP & CUT WIRE BASKETS BED PREPARATION 3/4 PARTS TOPSOIL 1/4 PARTS ORGANIC ....r.� 2" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED FINISH GRADE )F PRUNING TO REMOVE D LIMBS. RETAIN THE IvA I UKAL bMAHtz OF SHRUB. DO NOT CUT THE MAIN LEADER. DETAIL PLANTING FOR EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ZONING USE REPLACEMENT COND AR 21 ACER fremanii 'Jeffersred' Autumn Blaze Maple 2.5" CAI. 18 used for Tree Planting Requirement 18 for replacement @ .5 = 9" total 3 for replacement @ 2.5" = 8" total B & B CB 29 CARPINUS betula 'Frans Fontaine' Frans Fontaine Hornbeam 2.5" Cal. 29 used for Tree Planting Requirement 29 for replacement @ .5 = 15" total CID g CRATAEGUS viridis 'Winter King' Winter King Hawthorn 2.5" cal. 9 for replacement @2.5 " =23 "total B & B GD 3 Gymnocladus dioicus Kentucky Coffee Tree 2.0" cal. B & B GT 50 GLEDITSIA triacanthos Skyline' Skyline Honey Locust 3.0" cal. 26 for Perimeter Trees (3" along 161) 24 for replacement @3 " =72 "total B & B LP 18 PLATANUS x a. 'Liberty' Liberty London Plane Tree 3.0" cal. 6 for Parking Island Requirement 6 for replacement @ .5" = 3" total 12 for replacement @ 3" = 36" total B & B MA 10 MALUS 'Snowdrift' Snowdrift Crabapple 2.5" Cal. B & B MP 10 MALUS Prariefire' Prariefire Crabapple 2,5" cal. B & B QC 3 QUERCUS rubro Red Oak 3.0" cal. 3 for replacement @ 3" = 9" total B & B SB 2 SALIX babylonica Weeping Willow 3.0" cal. 2 for replacement @ 3" = 6" total B & B TS 5 TAXODIUM dlstichUm Common Bald Cypress 2.5" cal. 5 for replacement @ 2.5" = 13" total B & B OF 31 ULMUS x Urban Elm' Urban Elm Z. Cal Parking Island Requirement -19 total 19 for replacement @ .5" = 10" total 12 for replacement @2.5 " =30 "total B & B ZS 31 ZELKOVA serrta Village Green' Village Green Japones Zelkova 2.5" Cal 31 for Perimeter Trees 31 for replacement @ .5" = 16" total B & B PA 31 PICEA abies Norway Spruce 7 -8'& 8 -10'H 1 33% of Quaint. to be 8 -10' HT (10 total) 10 for replacement @3.0 " =30 "total B &B PP 45 PICEA pungens Colorado Blue Spruce 7 -8' & 8 -1 O'H 33% of Quant. to be 8 -10' HT (16 total) 16 for replacement @3.0 " =48 "total B & B PS ¢7 PICEA omorika Serbian Spruce 7 -8' & 8 -10'H 33% of Quant. to be 8 -10' HT (16 total) 16 for replacement @ 3.0" = 48" total B & B TO 169 THUJA occidentalis 'Techny' Mission Arborvitae 6' HT. Evergreen Tree B &B TG 107 THUJA occidentalis Nigro' Dark Green Arborvitae 5 -6' HT. Evergreen Tree B &B EA 222 EUONYMUS alata 'Compacta' Dwarf Burningbush 24" HT Deciduous Shrub CONT, JB 25 JUNIPERUS s. Broadmoor' Broadmoor Juniper No.3 Evergreen Shrub Display Area Screen Cont. JS 102 JUNIPERUS c, 'Sea Green' Sea Green Juniper 24" HT Evergreen Shrub VLIA Screen Cont. TD 104 TAXUS x media 'Densiformis' Dense Yew 24" Ht. MIN Evergreen Shrub B & B KF g CALAMAGROSTIS x a. Karl Foerster' Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass 2 Gal Ornamental Grass CONT. PH 66 PENNISETUM a. 'Hamlen' Dwarf Fountain Grass 1 Gal Ornamental Grass CONT. SD1 50 STELLA D'Oro Purple Purple Daylilly 1 CAL Perennial CONT. SD 35 STELLA D'Oro Stella D'Oro Daylilly 1 GAL. Perennial 24" O.C. CONT. + + d + + + IB 1165 IMPERATA 'Blood Grass' Japanese Blood Grass Plugs Perennial 24" O.C. CONT. SET TOP OF ROOT MASS V ABOVE FINISH GRADE SPADE EDGE BED PREPARATION 3/4 PARTS TOPSOIL 1/4 PARTS ORGANIC MATERIAL DETAIL PLANTING FOR SHRUBS Site Data 2" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED FINISH GRADE Tree Replacement - 361 caliper inches to be replaced - See Sheet TP -1 for trees to be removed - 376 Calipers Provided Evergreens make up 126" of total replacement of 33% of total. Property Perimeter Requirement (See Plant Schedule for plants used to meet requirement) Required: 1 tree140 ft. of boundary of vehicular area OFT,4 from Group A, B, or C, plus a 3.5 ft. average height continuous planting, hedge, fence, wall or earth mound. Trees along 161 to be 3" Caliper all others are 1.75 "caliper. Provided: 3' High Mound and or Evergreen Shrub provided along US 33 for BMW Campus and 6' High Mound for residual property. Evergreen Trees and Transplanted Deciduous Trees provided along Venture Drive. Vehicular Use Area Requirement (See Plant Schedule for plants used to meet requirement) Required: 1 tree140 ft. of boundary of vehicular area OFT,4 from Group A, B, or C, plus a 3.5 ft. average height continuous planting, hedge, fence, wall or earth mound. Trees to be 2.0" caliper in size. Provided: See Plan Interior Landscaping for Vehicular Use Areas: (See Plant Schedule for plants used to meet requirement) Landscape Area: Required: 5 sf of landscape area per 100 sf of vehicular use area Proposed 194,754 sf of vehicular use area / 100 sf * 5 sf = 9,738 sf Provided: 10,495 sf of interior landscaping with one tree per island Tree Planting: Required: 1 Tree per 5,000 sf of ground coverage. Trees to be 2.0" caliper in size. Proposed 234,642 sf of Building Coverage and VUA / 5000 at = 47 Trees Provided: 47- 2.5" Caliper Trees within proposed parking islands A minimum of 1 Tree @ 2.0" caliper min has been added to each Parking Island Additional Site Landscaping Requirement Required: Business Community Use: Landscape areas equal to 2% of the building ground coverage area. Building sf = 40,900 sf * 2% = 818 sf of landscape areas Provided: A minimum of 818 sf of Landscape Area has been implemented on the plan. Street Tree and Public Tree Requirement - Not Applicable Note: To increase diversity of tree species on the property, up to 33% of the replacements made on site can be evergreen or ornamental trees (no pines). A 7 -8' high evergreen tree will count similar to a 2.5" caliper deciduous tree. An 8 -10' high evergreen is equal to 3 ". A landscape design with evergreen trees of varying sizes, from 6 -feet to 10 -feet, is preferred. Evergreen trees used to satisfy the tree replacement requirement may be used to supplement buffering of service areas, loading areas and service structures. Replacement trees can not be used in place of other trees providing specific landscape requirements. The Applicant is proposing to use the caliper inches for Perimeter and Interior Tree planting requirement in excess of minimum tree planting requirement to satidfy the Tree Replacement Requirements The number associated with Deciduous and Evergreen Trees noted on sheets LP -1 and LP -2 as transplanted tree relate to the same number that is noted on Sheet TP -1. O Z U r - 0 Q cC w mw 0 Seal C 7 > L. 0 L 42 C Ln cV 00 Ln J O N 0 V N N EX � a 0o A b N Z a � v Z.Emm gg o 3 b � Drawings 0 Rezoning /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P&Z 09/19/11 13 PDP a R nn, 09/29/11 0 PDPa°bPia 12/27111 0 City Council 02/03/12 Project Number 011 -018 Sheet Title ro LANDSCAPE PLAN y� Sheet Number � LD -1 Notes The owner shall be responsible for the construction, erection, and maintenance of temporary fencing around tree preservation areas so that all protected trees shall be preserved. The fencing shall be located a distance from the trunk that equals, at a minimum, the distance of the critical root zone or 15 feet whichever is greater. Call the City of Dublin Landscape Inspector at 410 -4600 for tree fencing inspection. Fencing shall remain in place and be secured in an upright position during the entireconstruction period to prevent the impingement of construction vehicles, materials, spoils, and equipment into or upon the tree preservation area. Tree preservation signs must be located along the fencing, Any change in the protective fencing must be approved by the Planning Director. 1 \ The approved tree preservation plan shall be available on the building site before work commences and at all times during construction of the project. The owner shall be responsible or notifying all contractors and utilities. •1 '� ., •13 /n/ 9 � 41 7 58 42 3 - - - - -- 4 44 12 46 47 48 49 5051 52 53 54 ,u .1 � I I ► 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 33 ----- - - -- 4 0 - -- 27 - -- J 6 25 During all phases of of construction, all steps to prevent the destruction or damage toprotected trees shall be taken. No construction activity, movement and /or placement ofequipment, vehicles, materials, or spoils storage shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. No excess soil, additional fill, liquids, of construction debris shall be placed within the critical roots zone of any tree that is to be preserved. No attachments, including but not limited to ropes, nails, advertising posters, signs, fencesor wires (other than those used for bracing, guying or wrapping) shall be attached to any trees. No gaseous liquids or solids substances which are harmful to trees shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. No fire or heat shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. All utilities, including service lines, shall be installed in accordance with the tree preservation plan. bu 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 R7 RR no --- - - - - -- - �w Legend X Existing Tree for Removal or Transplanting • Existing Tree to Remain Tree Protection Fencing _- & 21 6 17 15 o �I- ' N - - - ------------ - M -J Tree # DBH (Inches) Type Condition Remarks 52 1 2 Coffee Tree Good To Remain 3.5 2 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 3 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 4 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 5 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 6 2 Elm Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 7 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 8 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 9 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 10 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 11 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 12 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 13 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 14 2 Coffee Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 15 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 16 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 17 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 18 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 19 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 20 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 21 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 22 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 23 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 24 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 25 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 26 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 27 2.5 Spruce Goad To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 28 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 29 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 30 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 31 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 32 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 33 2.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 34 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 35 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 36 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 37 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 38 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 39 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 40 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 41 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 42 3.5 Pine Goad To Remain 43 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 44 3.5 Pine Good To Remain 45 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 46 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 47 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 48 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 49 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 50 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 0 D I 84 I I I I I I 85 51 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 52 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 53 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 54 3.5 Spruce Good To Remain 55 10.5(2) Street Tree Good To Remain 56 8 (2) Street Tree Good To Remain 57 7 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 58 6.5 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 59 6.5(2) Street Tree Good To Remain 60 4.5(l) Street Tree Good To Remain 61 7 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 62 6 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 63 7.5 (2) Street Tree Good To Remain 64 6.5 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 65 5 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 66 12 (4) Street Tree Good To Remain 67 10.5(3) Street Tree Good To Remain 68 6 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 69 7 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 70 8 (1) Street Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 71 13,5(3) Street Tree Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 72 6 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 73 8 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 74 1.5 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 75 6.5 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 76 11.5(2) Street Tree Good To Remain 77 5,5(1) Street Tree Good To Remain 78 9 (2) Street Tree Good To Remain 79 8 (1) Street Tree Good To Remain 80 5 Elm Fair To Remain 81 5.5 Elm Fair To Remain 82 18 Crabapple Poor Tree to be Removed - No Replacement Value 83 8.5 Crabapple Poor Tree to be Removed - No Replacement Value 84 7.5(3) Hawthorn Poor Tree to be Removed - No Replacement Value 85 6.5 Pear Poor Tree to be Removed - No Replacement Value 86 30 Hackberry Good Tree to be Rennoved - To be Replaced 87 28 Ash Fair Tree to Remain 88 6.5 box elder Fair Tree to Remain 89 6 Pear Fair Tree to Remain 90 15 street tree Fair Tree to Remain Total Calipers Removed: 30 Incises W Z J o- 0 OUTLINE OF TREE CROWN (EDGE OF DRIPLINE) CORRESPONDS WITH ROOT SPREAD PROTECTION FENCING SURROUNDING CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OR 15' WHICHEVER IS GREATER W Z 0_ I o POST SPACING 0 6' O.C. WITH 4 TIES PER POST. HEAVY DUTY, HIGH VISIBILITY CONSTRUCTION FENCING IS TO BE USED. - -- --------- - - - - -- Cp\111CAL PvOOT ZONF 1.0' RADIUS FROM TRUNK FOR EVERY 1" CALIPER OF TREE SIZE (OR 15') I WHICHEVER IS GREATER DETAIL Q EXISTING TREE PROTECTION .. I COLUMBUS- MARYSVILLE RD Tree Inventory List Midwestern Auto Group - BMW / Mini Expansion - 12109/11 CL O oc z 0 �Q � w H m N > w D E Seal O Q N Q N L N Ln 00 Ln U J N M O - v -, N N_ Co B O'oo �3vi' H a� 3 Z� E�co a�U n� b Drawings 0 Rezoninq /PDP 08/01/11 0 Informal P &Z 09/19/11 O PDP & /Rezoning 09/29/11 0 PDP &FDP /Rezoning 12/22/11 ■ City Council 02/03/12 Project Number 011 -018 Sheet Title = TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Bi g Sheet Number ga / TP -1 EQUIP. GND. CONDUCTOR TO LUMINAIRE. FUSED IN —UNE CONNECTOR KR WITH WATERPROOF BOOTS & BREAKAWAY RECEPTACLE INSTALLED ON PHASE WIRES. FUSE AT 15OX FLA. ( BUSSMAN 'HEB' SERIES FUSEHOLDER WITH KTK —R FUSES, OR APPROVED EQUAL.) POLE GROUND LUG. UNINSULATED COPPER COMPRESSION TERMINAL UL LISTED FOR 600 VOLT. DRILL TAP, & BOLT TO POLE. (BRUNDY YA'SERIES. OR APPROVED EQUAL.) #6 BAIZE COPPER GROUND JUMPER. SPARE CONDUIT ORIENTATION SCORE m iV dl • •. : •. 0 10 8 BARE COPPER GRD. PVC CONDUIT CADWELD TO GROUND RODS 5 /8 -0' COPPERWELD GROUND ROD DRIVEN IN BOTTOM OF CONDUIT TREN I #10 THHN UP TO LUMINAIRE GASKETED HANDHOLE. PROVIDE SLACK IN WIRING TO BRING CONNECTORS & FUSE HOLDERS OUT THRU HANDHOLE. 500 VOLT HIGH COPPER ALLOY SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR. (BURNDY *KS" SERIES OR APPROVED EQUAL) INSULATE WITH HEAT SHRINK CABLE TAP SPLICES. (RAYCHEM CTE SERIES.) (TYPICAL OF THREE.) REAM & BRUSH ALL CONDUIT ENDS GROUT —SLOPE TOP 1 /e TO DRAIN. FILL VOID BETWEEN BASE SOLID AFTER PLUMBING POLE. GROUT SHALL BE 10,000 PSI, HIGH STRENGTH, NON— LIETAUC. COMPLY WITH CRD —C -621. .I I.: CHAMFERED EDGES. ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED BY POLE MANUFACTURER. °I --- --- --- -- r 2' -0` DIA. fYi3d�l:h�111N� TYPE III, 4000 PSI CONCRETE, 5 -7X AIR ENTRAINED, REMOVE ALL EXPOSED FORM MARKS & FILL ALL SURFACE VOIDS. HAND RUB EXPOSED TOP & SIDES WITH SANDCOAT. APPLY TWO COATS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING TO 12' BELOW GRADE. 3 HORIZONTAL A VERTICAL / REINFORCING RODS. ASTM A -615 GRADE 60 TYPE 'S' DEFORMED BILLET, 6—J6 VERTICALS, EQUALLY SPACED, 04 HORIZONTALS, CIRCULAR FORMED, INSTALLED 12' ON CENTER, MAINTAIN MINIMUM 2' CONCRETE COVER. FIXTURES ALL 'PL's' 3 POLE BASE DETAIL L1.0 NTS FUSED IN -UNE CONNECTOR KIT WITH WATERPROOF BDOTS AND BREAKAWAY RECEPTACLE INSTALLED ON PHASE WIRES. FUSE AT 15OX FLA. (BUSSMAN 'HEB' SERIES FUSEHOLDER WITH KTK —R FUSES, OR APPROVED EQUAL) 60OVOLT HIGH COPPER ALLOY SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR. (BURNDY 'KS' SERIES OR APPROVED EQUAL) INSULATE WITH HEAT SHRINK CABLE. TAP SPLICES. (RAYCHEM 'CTE' SERIES.) (TYPICAL OF THREE.) — POLE GROUND LUG. UNINSULATED COPPER COMPRESSION TERMINAL UL LISTED FOR 600 VOLT. DRILL, TAP, & BOLT TO POLE. BURNDY YA' SERIES, OR APPROVED UAL.) #6 BARE COPPER GND. JUMPER. SPARE CONDUIT ORIENTATION SCORE #6 BARE COPPER GROUND IN PVC CONDUIT. CADWELD TO GROUND ROD. UNDISTURBED EARTH. 5/8'X10' -0' COPPERWELD GROUND ROD DRIVEN IN BOTTOM OF CONDUIT TRENCH. 1' -6' DIA. FIXTURE SATs TYPE III, 4000 PSI CONCRETE, 5 -7X AIR ENTRAINED, REMOVE ALL EXPOSED FORM MARKS & FILL ALL SURFACE VOIDS. HAND RUB EXPOSED TOP & SIDES WITH SANDCOAT. APPLY 2 COATS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING TO 12' BELOW GRADE. HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL REINFORCING RODS. ASTM A -615 GRADE 60 TYPE 'S' DEFORMED BILLET, 6 6 VERTICALS, EQUALLY SPACED, 4 HORIZONTALS, CIRCULAR FORMED, 12' ON CENTER, MAINTAIN MINIMUM 2' CONCRETE COVER. 4 POLE BASE DETAIL L1.0 NTS EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR UP TO LUMINAIRE. #10 THHN UP TO LUMINAIRE. GASKETED HANDHOLE. PROVIDE SLACK IN WIRING TO BRING CONNECTORS & FUSE HOLDERS OUT THRU HANDHOLE. GROUT —SLOPE TOP 1/4' TO DRAIN. FILL VOID BETWEEN BASE SOLID AFTER PLUMBING POLE. GROUT SHALL BE 10,000 PSI, HIGH STRENGTH, NON — METAUC. COMPLY WITH CRD —C -621. I 1 `1 FINISHED GRADE • •• d I ••• •� GRAVEL ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED BY fa. POLE MANUFACTURER. o i PVC CONDUITS p \ I . i .• .' • •� �... ..•... TYPE 'FL1' FIXTURE. 70 WATT METAL HALIDE FLOOD LIGHT, STANCHION MOUNTED. EQUIPPED WITH FIXED GLARE HOOD. AIM LIGHT FIXTURE TO ILLUMINATE CARS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. FINISHED GRADE 1 11 11 11`1111 °N. ' 3' CONCRETE ON ALL SIDES BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. II.. f ° I CONDUIT / I ° . { I M R N STANCHION MOUNT BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. GROUND MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT 'FL1' DETAIL NO SCALE 400 WATT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HALIDE POLE LIGHT FIXTURE. FLAT LENS. it a u c tE STRAIGHT POLE RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLEA', 'PL5' & 'PL5A' NOTE: 'PL3A' = TYPE 3 UGHT DISTRIBUTION 'PL5', 'PL5A' = TYPE 5 UGHT DISTRIBUTION SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE L °I Jf DESCRIPTION ' I, DESCRIPTION PI-3A -- CS a e WALL MOUNTED CUT —OFF WALLPACK LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A 70 w WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE FORWARD THROW LIGHT 2' -0` DIA. fYi3d�l:h�111N� TYPE III, 4000 PSI CONCRETE, 5 -7X AIR ENTRAINED, REMOVE ALL EXPOSED FORM MARKS & FILL ALL SURFACE VOIDS. HAND RUB EXPOSED TOP & SIDES WITH SANDCOAT. APPLY TWO COATS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING TO 12' BELOW GRADE. 3 HORIZONTAL A VERTICAL / REINFORCING RODS. ASTM A -615 GRADE 60 TYPE 'S' DEFORMED BILLET, 6—J6 VERTICALS, EQUALLY SPACED, 04 HORIZONTALS, CIRCULAR FORMED, INSTALLED 12' ON CENTER, MAINTAIN MINIMUM 2' CONCRETE COVER. FIXTURES ALL 'PL's' 3 POLE BASE DETAIL L1.0 NTS FUSED IN -UNE CONNECTOR KIT WITH WATERPROOF BDOTS AND BREAKAWAY RECEPTACLE INSTALLED ON PHASE WIRES. FUSE AT 15OX FLA. (BUSSMAN 'HEB' SERIES FUSEHOLDER WITH KTK —R FUSES, OR APPROVED EQUAL) 60OVOLT HIGH COPPER ALLOY SPLIT BOLT CONNECTOR. (BURNDY 'KS' SERIES OR APPROVED EQUAL) INSULATE WITH HEAT SHRINK CABLE. TAP SPLICES. (RAYCHEM 'CTE' SERIES.) (TYPICAL OF THREE.) — POLE GROUND LUG. UNINSULATED COPPER COMPRESSION TERMINAL UL LISTED FOR 600 VOLT. DRILL, TAP, & BOLT TO POLE. BURNDY YA' SERIES, OR APPROVED UAL.) #6 BARE COPPER GND. JUMPER. SPARE CONDUIT ORIENTATION SCORE #6 BARE COPPER GROUND IN PVC CONDUIT. CADWELD TO GROUND ROD. UNDISTURBED EARTH. 5/8'X10' -0' COPPERWELD GROUND ROD DRIVEN IN BOTTOM OF CONDUIT TRENCH. 1' -6' DIA. FIXTURE SATs TYPE III, 4000 PSI CONCRETE, 5 -7X AIR ENTRAINED, REMOVE ALL EXPOSED FORM MARKS & FILL ALL SURFACE VOIDS. HAND RUB EXPOSED TOP & SIDES WITH SANDCOAT. APPLY 2 COATS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING TO 12' BELOW GRADE. HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL REINFORCING RODS. ASTM A -615 GRADE 60 TYPE 'S' DEFORMED BILLET, 6 6 VERTICALS, EQUALLY SPACED, 4 HORIZONTALS, CIRCULAR FORMED, 12' ON CENTER, MAINTAIN MINIMUM 2' CONCRETE COVER. 4 POLE BASE DETAIL L1.0 NTS EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR UP TO LUMINAIRE. #10 THHN UP TO LUMINAIRE. GASKETED HANDHOLE. PROVIDE SLACK IN WIRING TO BRING CONNECTORS & FUSE HOLDERS OUT THRU HANDHOLE. GROUT —SLOPE TOP 1/4' TO DRAIN. FILL VOID BETWEEN BASE SOLID AFTER PLUMBING POLE. GROUT SHALL BE 10,000 PSI, HIGH STRENGTH, NON — METAUC. COMPLY WITH CRD —C -621. I 1 `1 FINISHED GRADE • •• d I ••• •� GRAVEL ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED BY fa. POLE MANUFACTURER. o i PVC CONDUITS p \ I . i .• .' • •� �... ..•... TYPE 'FL1' FIXTURE. 70 WATT METAL HALIDE FLOOD LIGHT, STANCHION MOUNTED. EQUIPPED WITH FIXED GLARE HOOD. AIM LIGHT FIXTURE TO ILLUMINATE CARS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. FINISHED GRADE 1 11 11 11`1111 °N. ' 3' CONCRETE ON ALL SIDES BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. II.. f ° I CONDUIT / I ° . { I M R N STANCHION MOUNT BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. GROUND MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT 'FL1' DETAIL NO SCALE 400 WATT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HALIDE POLE LIGHT FIXTURE. FLAT LENS. it a u c tE STRAIGHT POLE RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLEA', 'PL5' & 'PL5A' NOTE: 'PL3A' = TYPE 3 UGHT DISTRIBUTION 'PL5', 'PL5A' = TYPE 5 UGHT DISTRIBUTION u a u c tE STRAIGHT POLE RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLED' & 'PL5DA' NOTE: 'PL5D', 'PL5DA' = TYPE 5 UGHT DISTRIBUTION r a u c HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HALIDE WALL FIXTURE, FLAT LENS. =Ol a. W1 — 70 WATT W2 — 150 WATT tE STRAIGHT POLE 00 I I .n o �N 33 w x RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLEH' & 'PLSHA' NOTE: 'PL3HA', 'PL3HA' = TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITH NEW HOUSE SIDE SHIELD LIGHT FIXTURE DETAILS L1.0 NTS • "° "'°'NTAL LAMP E LIGHT .NS. 400 WATT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HAUDE POLE LIGHT FIXTURE. FLAT LENS. NOTE: SEE SHEET SL1.04 FOR APPEARANCE OF TYPE 'SAT1' LIGHT FIXTURES. FIXTURE TYPE 'W1'. 'W2' NOTE: TYPE FORWARD THROW UGHT DISTRIBUTION 8� fL D ice Z , W a O O S C Q N PA1J�atN�r' AN-009 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS stNtNU��► SL 1 .02 J: \2011 \1105 —K Mac, BMW Sl.e Ligh.irg \SL1.02.dw5, 12/21/2011 9:17:32 AM, duareb SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE DESCRIPTION TYPE DESCRIPTION PI-3A SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 W7 WALL MOUNTED CUT —OFF WALLPACK LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A 70 w WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE FORWARD THROW LIGHT 25' SQUARE STAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS. DISTRIBUTION. MOUNT HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLAN. WHITE FINISH. FLAT LENS. PL3H SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 W2 WALL MOUNTED CUT —OFF WALLPACK LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A 150 WATT �.' WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE FORWARD THROW LIGHT DISTRIBUTION. A 20' (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN) SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL MOUNTING HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLAN. WHITE FINISH. FLAT LENS. POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS, w/ HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. SAT1 POST TOP MOUNTED DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN LIGHT TO MATCH EXISTING. PL3HA SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 150 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 5 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION, WHITE FINISH, �.� WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON ON A 14' ROUND STRAIGHT POLE. A 25' (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN) SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS, w/ HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. FL1 GROUND MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT WITH DIE —CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, (1) 70 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP, WIDE FLOOD OPTICS, FIAT GLASS LENS, PL5 ADJUSTABLE SWIVEL MOUNT, FIXED GLARE SHIELD, DARK BRONZE FINISH. SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 �. WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 5 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A 20' SQUARE STAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS. PL5A SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 �. WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 5 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A 25' SQUARE STAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS. PL51) DOUBLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 WATT PULSE START METAL H/WDE LAMPS, TYPE 5 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A 20' SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS. PL5DA DOUBLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH HORIZONTAL 400 WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMPS, TYPE 5 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A 25' SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE, BRONZE FINISH, FLAT LENS. u a u c tE STRAIGHT POLE RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLED' & 'PL5DA' NOTE: 'PL5D', 'PL5DA' = TYPE 5 UGHT DISTRIBUTION r a u c HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HALIDE WALL FIXTURE, FLAT LENS. =Ol a. W1 — 70 WATT W2 — 150 WATT tE STRAIGHT POLE 00 I I .n o �N 33 w x RETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PLEH' & 'PLSHA' NOTE: 'PL3HA', 'PL3HA' = TYPE 3 LIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITH NEW HOUSE SIDE SHIELD LIGHT FIXTURE DETAILS L1.0 NTS • "° "'°'NTAL LAMP E LIGHT .NS. 400 WATT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL HAUDE POLE LIGHT FIXTURE. FLAT LENS. NOTE: SEE SHEET SL1.04 FOR APPEARANCE OF TYPE 'SAT1' LIGHT FIXTURES. FIXTURE TYPE 'W1'. 'W2' NOTE: TYPE FORWARD THROW UGHT DISTRIBUTION 8� fL D ice Z , W a O O S C Q N PA1J�atN�r' AN-009 SITE LIGHTING DETAILS stNtNU��► SL 1 .02 J: \2011 \1105 —K Mac, BMW Sl.e Ligh.irg \SL1.02.dw5, 12/21/2011 9:17:32 AM, duareb 'n D.0 D.0 .1 D.1 D.s D.s D .3 D. ba . D. D.7 D.7 D.f .b.3 D.a D.4 D.4 �D.4 D.1 D.1 D�D.a D.0 D.0 D. .1 s .3 D.4 D.4 . D.f D.• 1. .0 a 1.1 1.0 D� b.7 D.7 D f D.a D.1 D.1 D.1 1: \ D.a D.a D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D. D.1 .s D. a D.a D.f D .s 1.4 .4 1. 4 s 1.1 1. D.9 D.9 D.7 .3 D.s D. \ D.1 D.1 D.1 Dle D.a D.a .a D.a D.a D.a D. BALES LOT NW DRIVEWAY NORTH D.0 D.1 D.1 .• D.9 1. .f 1.• 1 99 1.e�1.4 1. 1.1 1.a D.9 D.9 D.4 D.s D a D.1 D. D.a D.a a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.0 D.1 D.1 D.s .3 .f .9 1.1 1.3 1.4 . !.1 .4 .s !.s !.4 !.7 !.4 !:5 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 i.a i.s D D.s 1 D.1 D.1 D.a D.a D. D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.0 D.0 D.1 D.s D.3 D.a D.9 1.3 1.0 11.4 11.9 11.9 11.0 11.4 11.7 !.s !.s %.0 !.7 !.f \ 11.0 1.4 1.0 11.7 !.a 11.7 11.0 .f D.4 D.3 D. a D.� D.1 D.0 a D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.s D.3 D.f D.9 1.4 !.s 11.0 D.1 D.5 D.7 h.1 ha h.s h.1 h.s 1A.5 11.3 11.1 1.7 11.0 11.9 D.s h.9 h.• D.1 1.2 D.4 D a D. D.1 D.1 bit, D.1 D.1 1 D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.a D.o D.a D.a D.a D.o D.a D.a D.a D.o D.a \ PL3H � D.0 D.1 D.1 D.3 D.a D.• 1.0 1.4 !.s 11.4 D.7 h.7 i.0 i.0 h.9 i.s 1.0 1.0 i.4 !.t !.a 1.1 l.o !.1 !.s !.s h.s D.• 2.9 1. .3 D. s .s a D.1 D. D.1 D.1 D.1 D.a D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 La D.0 D.0 D.0 La D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 La D.0 D.0 PL5DA(E) D.a D \ \ a Ds D.4 Da is i.a L4 !a !.• is !a l.a !.e i.a !.e 1�# a- L4 !.• la 1.� \s la i.a !a V. ! s D.a�D. s Ds D.1 ba a D.1 D.0 D.0 .0 D.0 D.0 D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D. o D.o La D.o D.o 1, a s a .5 la L4 is !.a !. i.i is i.i ha i 1.5 1.5 11.0 4 !.1 1.5 la i.a Da is i.f a .7 a Ds D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D. D.a a D.o .o . " ha h:1 D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o D.o ( \ �, D Da Ds 1.1 1 .a .s .4 l.i iAi 6.4 !a 1.4 i.9 %.7 !a !a 1.4 1.0 1.1.1.0 !a 4.5 i. D. D.7 • D. D D.1 D.1 D.1 b. D D a D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.a D.a D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D. D.1 D.1 1.0 .f !. .9 . i.s h.4 D.7 D f h.o h.o D.f 1.'s !.9 !0 Da D M .9 .• D.4 ha i.f a .• 1 D. s Ds 1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D. Da 4 .7 a !.a s .7 D.5 D.s D.i !.� }a l.f !.o L 1 Da f • .5 le !.o D.e !.t !.f 11.5 1.4 ha D.3 D. 9.2 9.1 .s D D 1 D.s s D. 1.2 1.7 !.a !, a 11.4 11.4 !a 11.0 11.4 11.0 1.7 1.4 la 7 • 1.1 ba 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 2.1 7 h h ! / / ��.4 % a D.3 9.4 9.3 _ D 1 D.s D. D.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.0 o .a ! !.a !.s !.s 11.0 1.0 1.5 is a D. e D D f D. D.• 1.0 1.1-1.1 1.2 1.7 1.7 11.1I ! s s .7 .4 .f .4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 ba ba � L3 D.5 .5 1, 1.5 1.• !.o .• .7 1.7 i.f 1. 1. 1. D.7 D. a D.5 i.a 1.1 1 i.f i.f 1. !.4 %.0 D.• #6 h. h . h. i. 11 .4 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.0 D.9 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.2 <1� •a a D. 2 1.9 1. 1. 1.4 la la is i.a ba ' 0 a 1.1 la 1.5 1. 1,7 1.f !.a !.s 11.4 !.a 11.1!.4 .4 1.• 1. !.7 1 .9 1.4 1.0 ! !.s ! , la !.o i.f 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.4 h.a i.: i. !.7 D. 1. i. h • D f .a .e .7 D.f 1.• i. i. D a h 7 3.1 �'. .9 1.7 1.5 1. 1. 1. 1 4 1 1 1 1.4 !.3 ! 4 11. ! 1.4 1.2 Da D.1 !.5 !.� 1.• !.1 !.s !.9 .s .4 .4 .4 .7 .i T.Y - L .o .: _ _ i.a h.• h.s D.7 D.4 . . . !.s 1.7 1.4 0 i.f !.s h f !.7 !.7 1.9 1 1.1 h.LD.7 .0 1.• !.s !.3 1.5 7 i.4 1.t 1.e 1.• 1.t 1.5 1.a i.a h.7 h.4 D.9 h .e !.9 !.o .5 1.7 !.s 9 4 !.s 1.7 1 1.1 5 D.7 I rs i .i i.a 1_a !.o !.s !.a !.o !.1 !.4 !.0 1.9 !.1 !.a 1.• W2(E) 4 h.4 i.s 1 o 1.5 1.f i.s .0 • !.7 .1 !.0 1.7 1.5 1.9 ! PLSDA .4 D.f .e !.s 1.• 1 .3 D.5 D.• D.• D. Uf 1.3 1. - Y.7 .4 .7 Ls .1 3 3 � 4 3 P A W2(E) W2(E) j !.9 !. !. W2(E) .f a 1.7 1.9 h.o 1. .7 !a 1.7 1 D.9 D.9 D. .9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 a i W2(E) W2(E) W2(E) ,s 1.9 !.• !.9 h. .a .4 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 .0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5 .1 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.2 • i .a D.f Da is 1.0 !. !.a 31.7 !a !a .o !a is is is is L4 1.4 .5 .4 1.4 1.4 1.4 is !a s !a 1.9 !.o l.a s i.a i 1.1 L4 1.0 !a It .4 !s !.4 !.0 1.5 la 1.1 . 1.0 !a !.o !a !a !a !.0 1.9 1.0 1. 1.7 Lf 1.7 !a !s !a Lf is Da 1.0 1.2 1.4 7 1. 1.0 1.7 11.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 .5 11.4 !.a 31.4 11.0 11.3 !.a 31.0 31.5 11.0 1. 1. 1.2 1.1 1.5 11.0 !. .4 . . .r j d.• 6.9 1. 1.1 1.1 L f 1. 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1. 1.4 1.4 11.4 11.4 317 !.4 !.a 11.1 31.4 Da D.4 11.9 1. 1.0 �Aa 6.9 1.2 1.9 31.4 a . 1.4 1.1 1. .f 1.4 1.4 la la 1. 1.4 1.0 11 f�.7 %.0 !a !a !.• D.• 4.1%4 1�4 ,y W2 EXISTING 1 1.0 1.2 5 1 7 .7 1.5 la 1. 3 .4 0 1.9 %.0 D.1 !. W2 1 BULDNG W2(E) .4 31.4 31.1 1.9 1.4 1.3 7 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.111.7 11.0 11.4 !. 11.7 !. 11.9 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.0 11.1 }.1 1.9 11.0 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.0 1.7 1.9 11.4 !. !a It + .; a .3 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.0 �.1 11.9 11.9 11.7 !a 1.7 1 IL _ .s 1. .1 1.7 1.5 11.1 1.9 1.9 .3 D.s D.1 1.2 !.s 1.7 11 1.3 1.5 7 It e W1(E) •s 1.0 !.4 1.• 1.5 1.9 1.2 h.s i.9 h.1 h.4 1.4 !.3 1.7 1 1.3 1.5 !.s D.e 7 2W PL5DA NEW BUILDNG !.• !.1 1. .7 i.f i.f .1 4.4 W2(E) 4.311 .9 1.4 1.9 1.4 1. 1.0 !.s 1.1 1.e h.4 !.s !.s 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 .a x .4 4.4 x .• 0.4 .• 4.01 I,.• D.• 1.0 1.1 1 !a ! 5 .} 1.1 i.• ha !.a 11.3 !.a 11.3 1.0 1.4 1.0 f 4.3 4.7 1. xx 11.4 !.s D.e .9K 1. W2(E) W1 (E) J D.• D.• 1.0 1 1 D.1 a D o !. !.9 !.5 a 4.4 .a x T1 1. !.s ! ;. 1 \Da 1.s !. ! e !.• .o o !. D.7 i.o s ! 1 !.• 1.9 .1 !.• !.7 \).i .o a f 1.9 • .4 s i I W 1. 4 1.0 11.3 11. i 9 f 1. 1 f 1. !.4 !.7 .1 1.7 .s 11.4 1.4 D.7 V.04.7 Da 1.4 It D. 7 a } .• 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.4 4.9 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.7 1.1 11 1 D D s .s f 1 .s 11.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.1 D.• 4.7 4.4 D.• ! • D. a s D 4 4 .4 4 .4 i.s 11.4 11.4 11.3 11.4 !.s 1.4 i.s 1. 1 1 s 3 .s 1.1 D.4 .s 1 .9 D.5 4.7 1. h.9 D.9 ha i.• i.7 i.1 !.• !.s 1.• .3 f .0 0 7 1.a • .f .f .1 1.9 !.3 ! !. !. !. !. !. ! !. ! 0 1 s .f .4 p(E ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! >'. D.f o 1.4 l.s i.7 D.4 .s .s .s .s .9 .4 .3 !.s 1.7 � .o D • to 0 .s .7 .�' !.s .9 . 1 s D.4 h.9 %A h.o 1.3 h.4 h.1 11.0 11.3 11.3 3.1 1.9 3.4 2.7 3.9 h.s 1 la A. !.s !. !.s !.4 !.7 D.e !.9 !.4 !.1 !.4 11 PL3 E) 1.7 !. A.9 %.a !.1 1.3 1.7 1.9 D.s i.1 ?J.2 h.1 1.5 1.e %.I h.1 1J.2 !.7 !.4 !.s !.s !.7 !.4 D. !.o !.7 !.1 D.e 11.5 D.s !.5 !.7 h.• 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.5 Da .1 Da 1.0 1.s 11.3 M h.0 DJ !.1 !.7 1 %.9 %A !a !a i.7 !.a De -tL."m O �� p Es.�a PL3r H spa 4.s 4 D.a 11.3 . i a 4.4 11.4 11.4 D 7 4.7 a is is !a !.o .9 ><)ri.• 1.1 1.5 1 1 0 • 1.0 11.0 1.4 1(E PL3HA D.f .a 43 D. D. 11.1 D.s D.s D.s D.s D.s D.s D.s 4.3 11.4 11.4 11.7 D.• D.• 11.9 1.0 D.f D.s D.s D ( " FL1(E • A D. A. 11.1 11a ba .s 4.s 4.s 4.1 4.1 11.1 4.s D. .s 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 .s s .s - T(E LT(Er 4.0 ba 11.1 11.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.1 a .1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 1 4.1 D. 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 D. .2 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.11 a 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Da 4.1 4.1 Da Da Da 4.1 Da Da Da a Da Ds Da Da Da D. D 1 Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da D.o D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 a Da Da 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.1 421 4.1 D. 4.1 4.1 11.1 4.1 4. 1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04. 04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.04.0 D. baD ba11.1 4.0 D. . o 4.0 4.0 4. o � 4.0 4.0 4.0 o 4.0 4.0 b".4 4.0 4. o 4.0 1 11. 11. 1.0 4.0 4.0 D. o 4.0 1 .0 9 4.o D. D. 4.0 D.o Ona_ a 4. D.o D.o (.o 4. D.o o> o 4.0 D.o 4.o e 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .o .o .o .o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o SERVICE /DOCK DRIVE COLUMBUS- MARYSVILLE RD II CARWASH DRIVE II II SALES LOT NE II D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 ba ba D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1a SALES LOT CENTRAL D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 �1 11.1 CA" D.0 1.11..1 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 I.1 -I 10 9 ►l - =k r ,7 .VA 7, 15 W I D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 1.1 ba ba-trD:s ba 1.1 -ba -L% -b 1 b . D a a h.0_D.s t.a 1.2 La '&a D.a t.2 ba 6.1 D.s D.s D.s D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.s D.s D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.1 D.0 D.0 D.0 D.0 �4 4 D.3 D.s s D.s D.s D s Ds D.s D.s D.3 D.s D.s D.1 s D.1 D.1 .0 a .o D.4 D.3 D.3 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.4 D.3 D.3 D.a D.4 D 4 ba ba D.s D.s D.4 .4 .a D.i was D. 3.T D:r � . D.• D.f D.7 1.2 1.1 1.0 D.• D.7 D.a D.a D.f D 7 D.• D.9 1.0 1.0 D.7 D.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.2 D.9 D.7 D.7 D.7 D.f D.f D.4 D.4 D.4 D44 D.4 D.f D D.7 D.f D.� 1.2 D.• 0.9 0.2 0.2 O.s D.1 PL3H { 3 4 ! 5 !.5 !.a !.a !.7 !.• !.a !.9 p as !.4 !.9 1.1 !.9 !.7 11.0 W 1.9 1.9 1.4 1.2 D.• D.o D.o D.o D.• D 9 1.0 D.9 D.9 1.3 D.• D.s D.4 D.4 D.a D.s P H P H - a .a !.f i.a h. !. D 4 h 1 .o .4 J.7 f D.s !. D. h t D a .• .9 .• h.s !. h. h. s i : .s .a .1 D.1 D. h. 1. h 1 h a .1 .4 .7 i.f i.a .5 1.4 !.i s 1.• 1, l.a D.a i.s .i D.s D.i b.4 D.s 1 L a .• .4 D �, 1 9 a 7 s ,4 .1 i. 1. 7 1 4 h Al 1. h s D • s .a !a !a 1.4 .4 L4 1.4 a !.7 !. !.o !.o is .4 Ds D. D.4 Ds 1.9 !.4 !.s !.7 D.4 h.a D.9 1.5 !.s !.4 11.3 5 h.s h.• h.a %.0 1.4 D.s 1.• h.o i.4 1.4 !.e h.s 1.9 Da Da h.a i.7 1.5 i.9 h.4 D.1 1.• !.9 1.s %.0 1.4 !.4 1.• 1.4 1.7 1.9 CD.L h D.4 1.9 !.7 1 1.1 D. D.4 D.a 1.4 11.1 !.1 !.3 !.• !.4 !.0 !.3 1.0 11.0 1.7 1 9 !.7 !.4 !.a !.1 !.7 D.4 D.• D.• h.4 i.7 h.a D.4 !.7 Da D.f D.• h.• i.4 h.• D.9 D.1 !.7 !.4 !.1 !.s 11.5 !.s 1.7 1.7 1.9 !. !.5 D.9 p � h.7 !.7 1.2 D. D.a D.4 P sino 1.5 1 , 1 9 f IA Ts1. .1 !.9 5.1 .i .7 Ls Ls 9.5 D 5 !a L5 h.4 h.7 1 1 L4 L5 ha .• .9 .7 .1 .5 .5 rw . iZ !3 !7 DZ hY p- - - - - - - - - - - - . 1.4 1.9 !. !.. !. D e i .5 .0 .0 1.7 l 0 !.1 !.4 7 !.0 !.9 1J.1 l 1.1 1. l.s 1.4 h.D 1.4 !.• D.s h.D .i .t 4 .1 .t .9 .7 !.0 !.1 !.1 !.3 9 !.4 31.6 i !.9 .• 1.3 1.0 !.3 !.• !.9 !.• !.7 !.4 !.0 1.0 1.• !. 11.3 !.5 .0 !.a D.1 h.s 1 4 1 4 1 0 1 • .t .7 .9 D.3 7711 1. 4 a .7 a .9 31.1 11.7 1.5 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.5 11.4 X1.0 31.5 ! 31.4 31.5 !.+ 1.2 1.7 11.1 11.9 31.0 !.s 11.9 11.4 11.1 1.9 1.9 .9 1.4 Da h.a� i.¢ i.p %�3 %�$ J.7 �.• p.o1%.4I4.41 i h.l1.�e 1 1 1 e �s ai ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! .1 a.a p.s .4 .4 .1 .• .• .• .• � l.3 D.s /%.4 3 !.714 1.1 1.4 1.4 a Lt !.o !.o !.4 .4 !.• D.5 D.5 D.4 4.1 D.4 h.o 1.1 D.f !.9 Da 4.1 h.i h.3 h.a 4 D.7 D.s %.0 %.0 .e !.4 !a !a !.0 '1 %.0 h.a h D. D.4 D a. 1P1.7 !a !a 1.0 1.9 1.7 1.7 !a !�r 31.7 Lt h.1 D.5 !a 31.5 31.5 !a L4 11.3 !a Ds ha h.7 D.4 ha 11.9 11.9 L4 11.0 L3 D.9 .1 L• D.9, -17 .5 Lt h, 1 !.1 !.4 !.a !a 1.9 Da h.7 i. D.4 !.7 !a !a 1.a 1.4 1 1..4 1. L4 D.s 11 .o a .4 .o .a L1 Li D.f 9 .a i.��a is D Da h.a 7�. �t 1.7 i.l DA W2 !.4 D.5 l.a a !a !.o !a Ii D.f 1.s 1. D.f !.o !.o o 1.r 1.o D.f h.a L is t i. 1. .7 Da o 4.2 1.a SP h.o D.s a D.s h. i.a 1.6 V`w .9 h.7 3 1.9 1.9 1.9 !.3 1 D.9 D. • L7 L4 D. D a L4 L• ha a D D.7 i.4 h.a h.o 7 D. f a D h.i D !a L1 .4 D. s ha ha s DA � !.0 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.7 !.s .a h.4 1. 1 .• .a D.s D.s D.t D.o h.s %J i. l.s l.t .7 h.9 h.a h � 31.4 ! ! . .7 D.o 1.7 i.s.7 .9 .i . .9 .9 D. D.s D.s 1.0 1.• 1.5 1.4 1.• !.s .5 D.7 h. 4 i.1 .1 %. !. D.s h.o h.4 s 1 D.7 a Ds h.• D.9 D % h h.7 %.1 i.4 h.7 L1 1.8 .9 Da Da D.e 1.3 !.4 4 1.5 !.a !.s !.1 !.0 !.s .a Da h 4 %.5 %.9 D.5 D.1 D.4 h.o i. i. i.4 1 1. - h.• h.4 h.o s a D.J,�2 h.s '. 1.9 1.4 1. D.5 h.a D.9 !. !.a D. D.1 .a a .• 1.5 1.9 ys %.51.8 D.9 ha ha 1.1 f o h. i.1 .4 h.7 h.a h h. h.a .f 11.9 .9 D.e D.1 .9 1.4 1.4 .7 D.4 W2 of D. D.1 1.4 !.s 1.1 !a .7 1.1 1.5 1.7 v D.5 ha .9 .3 s h.• h.a h.4 h.a .3 .4 ha Dal 1.4 1.4 a 1.a 1.a 5 D.1 o iA 1.7 1.• 4 !.a !.4 .9 1.5 1.7 !.9 I11 D.5 h.a t � 1 7 a s D. 1. is h.7 h.a h. i. 1.1 .4 i.7 i.1 D.• .• 1 1a 1a 1. Da h.e V`l s0. 1 a .7 i.0 La P DA .0 1.4 !.3 ! .4 !.4 !.3 .4 D.4 D .• D.9 h.4 1. 1. l.a 9.e i.0 h.4 h.4 .7 9 1 • l.a 1.9 h.• h.o D. !.4 !.4 !.5 .s D.o D. D.4 h.7 i�D.9 1.1 h.s D.1 a 1.s !a !.a !.4 !.f !. #.1 ha .o h.9 h.o 1.1 h.o %.a i.4 i.s b4 D.9 D. 1. h. i. .a l.9'K Ls h.4 .e !.4 !.4 .9 Da a D.e !.4 .1 h.4 ii.4 7 La Ll .• 11 D.7 1.3 l.a i.• h.s D.5 h.4 h.4 h.4 h.s .9 .4 7 i. 1.4 1 /a i.7 1.1 D. !.4 !.4 !.5 D. .9 Ls !.4 !.5 D.f D.5 5%11.4 D.1 ! .• 9.1 1.3 i.4 D.9 D.4 D.5 h.a h.i h. h. h. h. 4 D.4 1.1 h.9 #.• 1.1 ! 11.5 !.a 11.4 11.9 D. 1 .4 9 D.• D. !.5 !.a ! !.o 4.7 4.4 W2 !.s !.s .9 1. 1. o .1 11.0 11.0 h.s .o .• 1.s .s 1.1 Da D.e Da D.• 7 !.4 !.s !.5 .7 D.s D h.4 1.0 .1 D.9 1. 11.4 11.7 11.5 11.1 1 • i.o .s ! 0 1. i.o D.7 .0 1 • !.s .s i.s i.s .5 !.s 11.7 11.9 11.4 1 !. !.1 1.7 .9 ! 9 !. 1.• 1.3 a .4 !.i !a !.4 !.i .s 1.9 1.5 1.5 1.4 T !. 11.1 11.4 a a 11.4 11.0 !a 11.9 !.• !a 1.1 Da 1.0 AT1 • SA 0 1 0 !a 1.• !a !. 3.i !.3 1.0 Da G !.a %.7 i. 1 1.9 1.4 i, i.0 h .s !.7 1 D.o�: !.• !.4 1 .9 L4 s i.1 Ap p • ppAp 11.1 %.2 D. D.9 h.4 s 1 h.4 s 1.5 .0 1.7 i.4 .a Da !.4 11 .4 !.7 !.7 !. • D. ka D.4 D.9 i.7 l i i. D.• ! • !. la }.• !.a ! 3.7 D.4 D.• .7 D.9 h.• 1.s 11.0 1.• 1.4 i. D.• D.o .s !.1 !.4 !.i 9 D.4 !.• D. h.s 1.1 s 1.s 1J.1 D. a -- FL1 .11.4 .4 It 11.1 11.1 D.e D.s D.4 K i.1 i.f i. 1.1 D.7 11.4 !.s !.s 11.5 .9 1 D.s .1 o D.4 • D.o D. h.4 11.9 Ir y D.• D.1 11.5 !. 1 1 !.4 .s • !.0 !.4 !.7 !.9 D. D.9 h.a ha D. !.9 !.4 !.4 !.a !. D.s i.1�h.s i. Ls .0 Ls .9 !.9 D. D.9 ... D.s !.9 !a ! 3 S 2.4 11.4 UP, !a !.a !.5 !.7 !. %.a .7 D.1 !.• !.7 !.a ! 7 • 4.s s ha #01 1.44 %. 1 .9 L4 a D.4 D.9 D.kb.1 ha !.o 11.4 1.• !. !. !. 1 9 1 3 s .7 !. 9 !a !. !.9 1.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1. f 1 s 1 s a s .7 !.7 !.4' 9 !.7 1 11.0 /!ca`I�,1.a 'rtDa D.o h.1 D.t D.e !.o a a s Da Da Da h.o i.f + b.2 b i.e D.9 L D.t D.t 7 h h h.a La ! 11.0 !.9 1.6 1. 1 9 s .5 a !�• 1. l.s 1.7 1.3 1.4 !.0 11.6 !.0 !.4 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.9 !.9111.4 !.a !.a !.s 1.a9.i 1.5 1.8 D.s D.9 h.4 h.• h.a D. o .s i.1 �h h. h. D.t ! 11.5 D. h.a 1 `1.7 l.o h. h. 1.0 1. 1.0 1.3 .9 h.o h. D.7 11 .s h.o h.o D.e !.4 !.7 1.4 !.• !.• 11.1 !.5 !.4 !.4 !.9 .0 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.3 !.4 11.1 D.s 11.1 11.6 !.s 1.9 !.1 !.4 !.4 11.0143 11.4 ?11.5 11.1 I# D.o !.4 !.• D.s h.i 4 i.i D. D.o D h.• • 4 1 1.9 3 9 D.e .s !.4 .4 5.9 143 5.3 1.9 D. 11.7 D. D.s !.• .3 11.9 1.• 1 !.7 11.4 h.• !.4 !.4 i.4 !.5 !.1 !.4 !.4 !.7 D.e 11.9 11.6 11.6 D.e D.• 11.5 !.7 !.4 11.4 I D.f i.1 !.s !.4 %A D.e 11.7 4 !.e a-1 1 ! 1 !s1 !a �` "T .r .f .a .o . Li !1! D .l L?.Z 1 11.6 a 111 l. or a ! ! !11 a .e a ! f %L �-�r !i ! i .9 .3 p o D.o D.o D.o D.o 4.o 11.1 PL3HA 11.111 4.1 4.7 D.• 4.9 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.9 1.1 11.9 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.3 1 1.3 PL3FIl� 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.f !.o l.s l.s 1. Ds D.a D.a D 4.3 Ds Ds 4.3 11.4 Ds D.o Da D. Sales Lot Central Da Dababa11.1bababa11.14.14.14.1 CalcTwe Units Avg Naz Min A /Nin Maz/Ni .1 .1 ba 4.0 4.0 o D.o D.o D.o D.o 4.o 11.1 1 11.111 4.1 a 4.1 ba 4.1 ba ba11.14.14.2 4.1 D 4.1 .s aD.2 4.1 D. 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.44.54.6 4.34.44.44.5 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.7 4.3 s 1 1 3.56 4. 4. 4. 1 .0 D.o o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 11.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 11.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 o 1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 11.111.1 o 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 o 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o DRIVEWAY SOUTH NORTH SITE LIGHTING PLAN - PHOTOMETRI WJ SCALE: 1 " = 40' -0" .a !.7 11.7 1.1 1.3 s is D a`t D 1 h.a D. la 1. i.7 D.• 11 !a !. Da D. D.s 11.7 11.7 f b ha D. !.7 !.7 !.a !a 9 1. a P DA PSA D�3 L• Da !a !a a i. 11.7 !.4 !.5 i.o 1111.2 f h D.o !.1 !a a-„)i .7 !.5 Da ha a L0 Da !.a !.0 1. o 11.4 .a D.f .4 !.s h.i 1.• 1.3 .4 h. D.e !.7 .7 h. 1.9 l.o .• !.• !.1 1.• !.9 .a !.4 !.9 h.4 h.a 4.0 • 11.6 !.s !.s {F D 9 11.1 .7 !. !.• 11.5 p.a h.7 h.4 1 0 !. !.a o a.4 h Ds i. !. 1.• !.s .s !, IJ !.7 !.1 D.e 11.4 !.4 .9 2.0 la 1.3 FL1 FL; F L 1 FL �L1� FL1 FL1 _ • !.• .3 D. s 11. D. _ 7 !.• D D.o 1 !.• !.4 !.1 It 1.9 1.9 2.3 !.• !.• 2.3 1, f l.s i.s 1 D D s FI Fit - a 1a 1.7 !.o !.' !.7 !.f !.o l.s �4 !.a !.1 0 !.f !.7 !.1 i.o 1.7 7 1.7 1.o 1.s 1.s 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.9 i.o 1.i 1.1ftif4 - 4# . DT Y 4.9 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.1 D. 4.7 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 i.s 1.2 1.1 1.0 4.9 4.9 D.• D.• 4.7 4.7 D.• D.• 4.7 4.6 4.6 D.• D.• 11.5 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.5 4.9 4.9 D.• D.• D.• D.• 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 4.9 D.• D.• D.• 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.1 9. 4 s DrDyDiDi11. 711. aDoDsDs15 ee56 45 4 . 44. 34. 34. 34. 34. 34. 44.5 4.5 4.34.2 4.2 4.2 4.14.14.14.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 4.0 4.0 D.0 4.0 11. 111. 111. 111.111.111.111.111.111.111.111.111.111.1 4.0 D.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.0 DRIVEWAY CENTRAL COLUMBUS- MARYSVILLE RD D.7 5 D.i D.9 D.f a D.• Da 13 D.9 D.f 13 1.0 D.i a 1.0 D.7 s D.9 D.7 o D.• D.f 1 Da D.i 1.2 D.9 D.f 1.1 Da ba 1.0 D.7 D.a D.9 D.f D.4 I D.• ba D.3 pa D.a Da ))) D.7 D.a D.3 D.7 D.4 D.s D.a D.3 D.s D.4 D.s D.s D.3 D.s D.1 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.1 D.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 s 4.4 4.3 4.2 D 4.4 4.3 4.2 D 4 a 4.2 4.1 4 4.s 4.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.s 4.2 4.2 Da 11.1 11.1 A .o 11:5 11 5 D D o D e D.o fie o 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 11.1 11.1 11.1 11.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 4.0 4.0 D.o 4.0 II SALES LOT EAST II CL O ice 5� z O � Q Lu W Lu a O O co Rood mmbw - A08 00® Calculation S umimmy Label CalcTwe Units Avg Naz Min A /Nin Maz/Ni calcPts Illuminance a c 2.12 17.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. Driveway NE illuminance 8c 2.15 5.2 0.6 3.56 8.67 Sales Lot East Illuminance !b 4.30 8.1 1.2 3.56 6.75 Sales Lot Central Illuminance Fc 5.74 9.9 3.2 1.79 3.09 Driveway Central Illuminance re 3.65 7.9 2.0 1.83 3.95 Sales Lot NE Illuminance Fc 5.16 10.2 1.7 3.04 6.00 Driveway North Illuminance Fc 3.49 1 8.8 10.9 3.86 9.78 Carwash Drive Illuminance Fc 2.15 14.6 10.7 3.07 6.57 Service /Dock Drive Illuminance Fc 2.93 1 N 1.3 2.25 3.62 Drivewa South Illuminance Fc 2.76 6.7 0.8 3.45 8.38 Sales Lot NN Illuminance Fc 2.44 1 8.8 1 0.8 3.05 11.00 SITE LIGHTING PLAN PHOTOMETRICS •SrtNnew SL 1.03 J: \2011 \1105 -K Mac, BMW S1.5 Ligh.irg \SL1.03.dwg. 12/21/2011 9:18:23 AM. duarob " (SAT1 LIGHT) 0les rvne: diamond: Catalog Number: got A JN P. 8" RC -Ocri AT go. DOLT ',]PQf Louis Lnu�POU Full ",an !SAO C 'IT.1. xr ,:D' L Paul B Fit 33al tilupir re(154) 34YS25'SRGH149 -11 p ot en eel www.louispocisen.mm RSA ales post tops /poles &cable hung EPA QUICK REFERENCE CHART R o u n d au I COL'S - PFOJSFTID APIA Elps HE SF 'Ali CI e_OCPO R S A } - GRAPH TDRA 5'3' 1 /250VUMH /ED28mogul Is p �,ann- rC rOL IS SAX PC SIR C, .WI 1 00 NPH IJn 85+4,- 10 J All A, Pon 14000 nen, Tho ,poo Don E, I exonslAAd � _ - ` 92 J i P E 4; ",orA No 11 Los 1 7 Ng 3 111111 S0 : I an 8 hour ®de 9 PLC 43 - - -. 12 0 312" S l Is 48 1.1 53 - -- 1 2 it - -- 5 4 ' - - - -. - - -'. 1"4., 14 S3 -i5 2A r9 :iIAt III Al PDT ITP Puts ANY WTIN IIA,MUS LU Fl AUHLL r IPL GIVLT FUH WIND C'LLAITY RACE R o u n d S t In ra I Cg III t A ' 'Ali { R S A } - GRAPH TDRA 5'3' 1 /250VUMH /ED28mogul Is p �,ann- i riabt nmcb WHI RSA 4S' to' ITS All A, Pon 14000 nen, Tho ,poo Don E, I exonslAAd � _ It ALI, 1) s", Itoh RSA 4S V 81% 1Y it ALO 14' G4APHIR G Y NAT. PAINT Atli WHT lotee boa 1-1—, L3 i9. Ia.3 V e dot o,reu I,, tL mardeie, FL Al ll- incht( 1) 11 Y5 Fa.e 8 94, 9350 lonfo www.louispoulsen.com IF 0 1 F E 5 Max Desl9n e... - -,. Type_ Proient, Catalog Number_ VOTES 1. FINISH. AS NOTED 2. VOLTAGE. 120P27W o. HID VERSION PROVIDED STANDARD WITH ONE 111 1 -CAN STYLE BALLAST FCR INSTALLATION IN POLES WITH INSIDE DIAMETER OF V4 "ORLARGER 4. MAXIMUM BALLAST TO LAMP DISTANCE FOR 150WMPS 5FT FOR 150W1MH 50FT AND FOR p5LMtlMH 11FT WIIVDLOADIIVG'. EP/b L8 S(. Ft. DIA (SAT1 LIGHT) metal halide HIGH PRESSURE MOLDED FIBER GLASS TOP SHADE WITH WHITE, GREY OR GRAPHITE GREY WET PA I NTFD FIN19H A I WITH HIGH REFLECTANCE WHITE: PAINTED UNDERSIDE UPPER REFLECTOR CONE WITH WHITE PAINTED FINISH (3) STAINLESS STEEL HEX CAP NUTS (a) Dar DIA. STAINLESS STEEL CONNECTING STRUTS WITH LOCKABLE TELESCOPING MECHANISM FOR RELAMPING WITH WHITE, GREY OR GRAPHITE GREY POWDER COATED FINISH INJECTION MOLDED CLEAR U V. STASH HI POI YCARHONATF ENCLOSURE INTECTION MOLDED POLYCARBONATE ANTIGLARE RING WITH GREY OR GRAPHITE GREY WET PAINTED FINISH FOR GREY VERFI ONF OR WHITE OPAL TRANSLUCENT FOR WHITE VERSION ONLY MAXIMUM LAMP. 1 /150W /MmED 28/M -102MN 42) lSOnW/M PAPn W(yl 9AAM 99) (BLOTTERS) — MOGUL BASE PULSE RATED SOCKET LOWER REFLECTOR CONE WITH WHITE PAINTED FINISH DIE CASTALUMINUM TENON SUPPORT AND LUMINIARE BASE FOR SLIP FIT OVER A 3" O o. X 3 3/4 LONG TENON WITH W IT HE OFF OR GRAPHITE GREY POWDER COATED FINISH AND SECURED WITH TWO 1/4 -20 SETSCREWS Bja{ t o , 100101 L g3250Be Lr a1P kP GRDr�udend Ic FL�.1 reeplone(954) S49 KJm5 Fax (951)349 - 2550 Per en mvw.louispoulsen.com Sate lfint Max post tops /poles & cable hung IAXVI Jars Moller Jensen ( a Dt SaxI11[ Mae provides glare free and symmehlal Illuminahon. The design of the top shade ensures he majority o f he light Is directed downward. The an d -glare ring shields the lamp from direct vim Flash WM[p grey or graph, m grog powder motod. ktadetlai Top shade Ole Rupert fiberglass Enclosure Injection molded clear pelyarbonare An n glare ring. Injection molded pair carbonate Base hie cast aluminum. army Stainless steel. Mounting post top. Moun led on dual round aluminum (Chad or round slalgh Ialuminum (RSA) pole. le "i VAR 32Ibs Hand cUl,We leatlon. IBEW metal halide -. 1n1 Pmlo(i mn^ A ' 'Ali ❑s 1, ❑mono"IS Dole 5Rr MAX T /150W/MH /ED 28 mogul - GRAPH TDRA 5'3' 1 /250VUMH /ED28mogul Is tr ,A,H WHI 14 2 -. - - - -. mow, All A, Pon 14000 nen, Tho ,poo Don E, I exonslAAd � _ one 120 /nrvIcanny,eb Nast to be mounted n RSA 4s' or Pak S' eAa enoata.mn ",orA No 11 Los 1 7 Ng 3 111111 S0 : I an 8 hour ®de 9 VI yl y V uu I r IAXVI Jars Moller Jensen ( a Dt SaxI11[ Mae provides glare free and symmehlal Illuminahon. The design of the top shade ensures he majority o f he light Is directed downward. The an d -glare ring shields the lamp from direct vim Flash WM[p grey or graph, m grog powder motod. ktadetlai Top shade Ole Rupert fiberglass Enclosure Injection molded clear pelyarbonare An n glare ring. Injection molded pair carbonate Base hie cast aluminum. army Stainless steel. Mounting post top. Moun led on dual round aluminum (Chad or round slalgh Ialuminum (RSA) pole. le "i VAR 32Ibs Hand cUl,We leatlon. IBEW metal halide Pmlo(i mn^ ng0leoorce 'Ali ❑s 1, ❑mono"IS Dole 5Rr MAX T /150W/MH /ED 28 mogul 120/ ➢]V GRAPH TDRA 5'3' 1 /250VUMH /ED28mogul GREY TPEA 45' WHI 14 2 -. - - - -. - - - -. IM notes - - -. - - -. - - -. zlnx variant Amato with one 120 /nrvIcanny,eb Nast to be mounted n RSA 4s' or Pak S' mle EEI U Sauteed pry Cal ",orA No 11 Los 1 7 Ng 3 111111 S0 : I an 8 hour uSoq ntgl rings gry m pntdt match vt h. VI yl y V uu I r IV For pl IO lan, reterto Pl page IAXVI Jars Moller Jensen ( a Dt SaxI11[ Mae provides glare free and symmehlal Illuminahon. The design of the top shade ensures he majority o f he light Is directed downward. The an d -glare ring shields the lamp from direct vim Flash WM[p grey or graph, m grog powder motod. ktadetlai Top shade Ole Rupert fiberglass Enclosure Injection molded clear pelyarbonare An n glare ring. Injection molded pair carbonate Base hie cast aluminum. army Stainless steel. Mounting post top. Moun led on dual round aluminum (Chad or round slalgh Ialuminum (RSA) pole. le "i VAR 32Ibs Hand cUl,We leatlon. IBEW metal halide 101r I I ll jh:ing I PC, 3260 4 aarP _ n FL k For: Leuesae„ a To ACT c (9.4) 549 E,I Fax (954) 349 - 2550 pawn w %louispoulsen.com L m ■ CL V O Z W l�J C e an an Ad•�KUr � — AN ON _ �•kllr ' •/� UM • •IRi DETAILS gi awaffA r A 1 e04 J: \2011 \1105 —K Mug BMW Sl.e 1-1ghdrg \S1-1.0 12/21/2011 9:20:15 AM, duareb Pmlo(i mn^ ng0leoorce 'Ali ❑s 1, ❑mono"IS Dole 5Rr MAX T /150W/MH /ED 28 mogul 120/ ➢]V GRAPH TDRA 5'3' 1 /250VUMH /ED28mogul GREY TPEA 45' WHI SperH x of -. - - - -. - - - -. IM notes - - -. - - -. - - -. zlnx variant Amato with one 120 /nrvIcanny,eb Nast to be mounted n RSA 4s' or Pak S' mle EEI U Sauteed pry Cal ",orA uSoq ntgl rings gry m pntdt match vt h. VI yl y V uu I r IV For pl IO lan, reterto Pl page V.Th e c�mparable EO version ha, thefolown, classification Ingress P t U nCodeIP66 101r I I ll jh:ing I PC, 3260 4 aarP _ n FL k For: Leuesae„ a To ACT c (9.4) 549 E,I Fax (954) 349 - 2550 pawn w %louispoulsen.com L m ■ CL V O Z W l�J C e an an Ad•�KUr � — AN ON _ �•kllr ' •/� UM • •IRi DETAILS gi awaffA r A 1 e04 J: \2011 \1105 —K Mug BMW Sl.e 1-1ghdrg \S1-1.0 12/21/2011 9:20:15 AM, duareb 0 w w w 3 rc a 0 U z 2 s Nw W zu a� w 2J � w id r BMWIMINI MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 5825 Venture Drive, Dublin, Ohio DUBLIN, OHIO BENCHMARKS SOURCE BM: ALUMINUM DISK SET IN TOP OF PARAPET WALL OF AVERY ROAD BRIDGE NORTHWEST ABUTMENT OVER U.S.R. 33, 2.5' ABOVE ROAD. NAVD 88 EL.= 948.583' BM #1: CHISELED "X" ON THE NORTH BOLT OF A FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF VENTURE DRIVE AND EAST OF THE BUSINESS PARK ENTRANCE. NAVD 88 EL.= 913.80 BM #2: CHISELED "X" ON THE NORTH BOLT OF A FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF VENTURE DRIVE AND EAST OF TELEPHONE AND GAS MARKERS. NAVD 88 EL.= 910.98 BM #3: CHISELED "X" ON THE NORTH BOLT OF A FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF VENTURE DRIVE AND EAST OF THE CHILDREN'S CLOSE TO HOME ENTRANCE. NAVD 88 EL:= 908.78 BM #4: CHISELED SQUARE ON WEST SIDE OF CONCRETE BASE FOR LIGHT POLE LOCATED SOUTH OF VENTURE DRIVE AND WEST OF THE CHILDREN'S CLOSE TO HOME ENTRANCE. NAVD 88 EL.= 908.78 STANDARD DRAWINGS CITY OF COLUMBUS SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE TRANSPORTATION AA -S100 AA -S141 AA -S149 2179 2222 AA -S133 AA -S145 2220 2300 CITY OF DUBLIN ST01 . �O 1 CH - 20 0 /w - wi o O DIST 69 °47'56" E (A WI w em - -- VENTURE DRIVE c� r DC as C3 i W < n N < n U� 0",a d 1 N 89 °16'34" W 725.00' U.S ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 8°10'5 261.70' 367.99' S 06 °11'35" E 24.59' I BRENTLINGER REAL U I ESTATE COMPANY ° PID: 273- 009976 ZONING: PCD I I BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY PID: 273 - 010156 ZONING: PCD cnLn NN D cn �o 4- m N 8916'34" W ' N 89 ° 14'48" W 85.79' 339 3.23' H -3.23' SST = ' 24 "E� �R= 111.50' A =80 °07'50" L 155.94' Ch= 143.54' DIST - S46'1 5'30 "E r cQ _� U � 0 w� �o o"' ° �zo p w O U o N � P Elf FI i o o r__ z J c� z W Cn =o° 4- �� cD `w w � U =o 5 INDEX MAP 1" =100' GENERAL NOTES 1. CITY OF COLUMBUS AND OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, CURRENT EDITIONS, AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS THERETO (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS), SHALL GOVERN ALL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IF A CONFLICT BETWEEN SPECIFICATIONS IS FOUND, THE MORE STRICT SPECIFICATION WILL APPLY AS DECIDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ITEM NUMBERS LISTED REFER TO CITY OF COLUMBUS ITEM NUMBERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. THE CITY ENGINEER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS, METHODS, PROCEDURES, TECHNIQUES, OR SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION THAT ARE NOT SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE CITY ENGINEER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY ON THE WORK SITE, OR FOR FAILURE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM WORK ACCORDING TO CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 3. THE DEVELOPER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OHIO EPA PERMITS TO INSTALL (PTI) AND NOTICES OF INTENT (NOI), BUILDING PERMITS, ETC. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF DUBLIN DIVISION OF ENGINEERING IN WRITING AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE PRECAUTION ALWAYS FOR THE PROTECTION OF PERSONS (INCLUDING EMPLOYEES) AND PROPERTY, IT SHALL ALSO BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INITIATE, MAINTAIN AND SUPERVISE ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK, INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFINED SPACES PER 29 CFR 1910.146. 6. FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND BEFORE REQUESTING OCCUPANCY, A PROOF SURVEY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING THAT DOCUMENTS "AS- BUILT" ELEVATIONS, DIMENSIONS, SLOPES AND ALIGNMENTS OF ALL ELEMENTS OF THIS PROJECT. THE PROOF SURVEY SHALL BE PREPARED, SIGNED AND SUBMITTED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WHO SEALED THE CONSTRUCTIONS DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY AND AREAS DEFINED AS PERMANENT AND /OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY PRESERVE BENCHMARKS, PROPERTY CORNERS, REFERENCE POINTS, STAKES AND OTHER SURVEY REFERENCE MONUMENTS OR MARKERS. IN CASES OF WILLFUL OR CARELESS DESTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATIONS. RESETTING OF MARKERS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN OHIO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 9. NON- RUBBER TIRED VEHICLES SHALL NOT BE MOVED ON OR ACROSS PUBLIC STREETS OR HIGHWAYS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TOEQUAL OR BETTER CONDITION THAN EXISTED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERCOURSES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE GRADES AND CROSS- SECTIONS THAT EXISTED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. 11. TRACKING OR SPILLING MUD, DIRT OR DEBRIS UPON STREETS, RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL DRIVES, SIDEWALKS OR BIKE PATHS IS PROHIBITED ACCORDING TO SECTION 97.38 OF THE DUBLIN CODE OF ORDINANCES. ANY SUCH OCCURRENCE SHALL BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE CITY. IF THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO REMOVE SAID MUD, DIRT, DEBRIS, OR SPILLAGE, THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REMOVE THESE MATERIALS AND CLEAN AFFECTED AREAS, THE COST OF WHICH SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 12. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS EXCAVATION WITHIN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN) IS NOT PERMITTED. 13. ALL SIGNS, LANDSCAPING, STRUCTURES OR OTHER APPURTENANCES WITHIN RIGHT -OF -WAY DISTURBED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. THE COST OF THIS WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 14. ALL FIELD TILE BROKEN OR ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED AND CONNECTED TO THE PUBLIC STORM SEWER SYSTEM AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THE COST OF THIS WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 15. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS SHALL BE INSPECTED AT THE LOCATION OF MANUFACTURE. APPROVED PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS WILL BE STAMPED OR HAVE SUCH IDENTIFICATION NOTING THAT INSPECTION HAS BEEN CONDUCTED BY THE CITY OF COLUMBUS. PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PROOF OF INSPECTION SHALL NOT BE APPROVED FOR INSTALLATION. 16. BACKFILL WITHIN A 1:1 INFLUENCE LINE OF EXISTING STRUCTURES (HOUSES, GARAGES, ETC.) OR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE (PAVEMENT, CURBS, SIDEWALKS, BIKE PATHS, ETC.) SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL ACCORDING TO ITEM 912 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR FLOWABLE CDF, TYPE III ACCORDING TO ITEM 636. ITEM 911 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE USED ELSEWHERE. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND A LIST OF PROPOSED PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS TO THE CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION DIVISION BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. SEND THE INFORMATION TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION DIVISION CITY OF COLUMBUS 1800 EAST 17TH AVENUE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43219 SEND A COPY OF THE TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: DIVISION OF ENGINEERING CITY OF DUBLIN 5800 SHIER RINGS ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO 43016 18. ALL TRENCHES WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OR SECURELY PLATED DURING NONWORKING HOURS. TRENCHES OUTSIDE THESE AREAS SHALL BE BACKFILLED OR SHALL BE PROTECTED BY APPROVED TEMPORARY FENCING OR BARRICADES DURING NONWORKING HOURS. CLEAN UP SHALL FOLLOW CLOSELY BEHIND THE TRENCHING OPERATION. 19. ALL TREES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PRESERVED, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH HIGH VISIBILITY FENCING PLACED A MINIMUM 15 FEET FROM THE TREE TRUNK. TREES 6 - INCHES OR GREATER AT DBH (DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT) MUST BE PROTECTED WITH FENCING PLACED AT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OR 15 FEET, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. TREES NOT INDICATED ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR REMOVAL MAY NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING. rV O . � U o_la 196.85 PCD CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. PID: 273-01229+ ZONING: PUD & PCD 467.62' I I I� BRENTLINGER REAL I ESTATE COMPANY PID: 273 - 011297 w ZONING: PCD I ! N 15.334 CD ACRES I' cn I� I PROPOSED ZONING LINE 20. CONDUIT MUST BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED ACROSS STREETS INSTEAD OF OPEN CUT, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. USE OF PNEUMATIC AIR RAM DEVICES IS NOT PERMITTED. PERMITS TO CONSTRUCT IN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF EXISTING STREETS MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF DUBLIN DIVISION OF ENGINEERING BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION, SHOULD OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT BE PERMITTED, CONTROLLED DENSITY BACKFILL (TYPE III) SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL, ACCORDING TO ITEM 636 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITION OF TRENCHES WITHIN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK, AND SHALL MAKE ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 22. PAVEMENTS SHALL BE CUT IN NEAT, STRAIGHT LINES THE FULL DEPTH OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL BE CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF COLUMBUS STANDARD DRAWING 1441 DR. A AND APPLICABLE CITY OF DUBLIN STANDARD DRAWINGS. THE REPLACEMENT OF DRIVEWAYS, HANDICAPPED RAMPS, SIDEWALKS, BIKE PATHS, PARKING LOT PAVEMENT, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND CITY OF DUBLIN STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 23. TREE TRIMMING WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE IS TO BE COMPLETED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE ARBORIST IS TO RETURN AND TRIM ANY BROKEN BRANCHES AS NEEDED. 24. ANY MODIFICATION TO THE WORK SHOWN ON DRAWINGS MUST HAVE PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF DUBLIN. 25. ALL INLETS SHALL BE CHANNELIZED, 26. PARK AREAS SHALL BE FINE - GRADED AND SEEDED WITH THE FOLLOWING MIXTURE: IMPROVED KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS: 40% OF WEIGHT (2 VARIETIES IN EQUAL PARTS) IMPROVED PERENNIAL RYE: 60% OF WEIGHT (2 VARIETIES IN EQUAL PARTS) GERMINATION RATE: 85% APPLICATION RATE: 7 LBS PER 1000 SQ FT OR AS DIRECTED BY THE DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION, CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO. 27. TRAFFIC CONTROL AND OTHER REGULATORY SIGNS SHALL BE TYPE S WITH A SQUARE POST ANCHOR BASE INSTALLATION AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF COOT TC -41.20 AND APPLICABLE CITY OF DUBLIN SPECIFICATIONS. 28. STREET SIGNS SHALL MEET ALL CITY OF DUBLIN SPECIFICATIONS WITH LETTERING COLORED IN WHITE DISPLAYED OVER A BROWN BACKGROUND. SIGN TUBING SHALL BE BROWN IN COLOR AND CONFORM WITH THE TYPE S, SQUARE POST ANCHOR BASE INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS OF ODOT TC- 41.20. } ._ A 6� a „m vflORTH S I T E sr�:,a�cs ws GlenvHaSe �" � _,14 ; ' 3 d LOCATION MAP 1"=1000' SHEETINDEX COVER SHEET C1 GENERAL NOTES C2.1 SITE DETAILS C2.2 SITE DEMOLITION & VEHICLE ACCESS PLAN C3 SITE STAKING PLAN C4.1/4.2 SITE UTILITY PLAN C5.1/5.2 SITE GRADING PLAN C6.1/6.2 STORM SEWER PROFILE C7.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS C8.1/8.2 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY SU1.1/1.2 OWNER / DEVELOPER /APPLICANT MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 6335 PERIMETER LOOP DRIVE DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 PHONE: 614.889.2571 CONTACT: TBD ENGINEER SANDS DECKER CPS, LLC. 1495 OLD HENDERSON ROAD COLUMBUS, OHIO 43220 PHONE: 614.889.2571 CONTACT: SCOTT SANDS ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE 165 NORTH FIFTH STREET COLUMBUS, OHIO 43215 PHONE: 614.469.7500 CONTACT: BRAD PARISH APPROVALS SIGNATURES BELOW SIGNIFY ONLY CONCURRENCE WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSES AND GENERAL LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ASSURANCE TO OPERATE AS INTENDED. ALL TECHNICAL DETAILS REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ENGINEER PREPARING THE PLANS. CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO DATE DIR. OF LAND USE & LONG RANGE PLANNING, CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO DATE APPROVAL (CITY OF COLUMBUS) APPROVAL ON THE PART OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS IS GIVEN PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE SEWER (AND /OR WATER) SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO DATED APRIL 13, 1993. DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF PUBIC UTILITIES, DATE CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO ADMINISTRATOR, DIVISION OF SEWERS AND DRAINS (AND/OR WATER), DATE CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO REGISTERED ENGINEER DATE OHIO Utilities Protection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) 1495 OLD HENDERSON RD COLUMBUS, OH 43220 614 - 459 -6992 FAX: 614-459-6987 TOLL FREE: 866-277-0600 507 MAIN STREET, SUITE 203 ZANESVILLE, OH 43701 740 - 450 -1640 FAX: 740-450-1641 SANDS DECKER CPS / O Z O a W U) m Z W 0 s O 7 �L 0 L C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings 0 Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 IN Informal P8Z 09/19111 0 0 0 g Project Number � 4g s A09_009 9 d _ Sheet Title COVER SHEET Sheet Number �d C i 3 0 w w 3 9 w 0 U z S N� w� z G� 2J � w id r UTILITIES 1. THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES ARE KNOWN TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS PROJECT: COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO 800 - 344 -4077 AEP /COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER 800 - 277 -2177 DUBLINK DEVELOPMENT /FISHEL (IAN SMITH) 614 - 921 -8602 OR 614- 778 -3820 DUBLIN DIVISION OF ENGINEERING 614- 410 -4600 FIBERTECH NETWORKS 866 - 697 -5100 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS 720 -888 -1000 TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS 800 - 617 -4311 XO COMMUNICATIONS 614 -629 -3200 AT &T 800 - 248 -3632 ODOT DISTRICT 6 740- 833 -8000 COLUMBUS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 614 - 645 -8270 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSTRUCT TO OHIO UTILITIES PROTECTION SERVICE (TELEPHONE NUMBER 800- 362 - 2764), PRODUCER'S UNDERGROUND PROTECTION SERVICE (TELEPHONE NUMBER 614 - 587 - 0486), AND TO OWNERS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT ARE NOT MEMBERS OF A REGISTERED UNDERGROUND PROTECTION SERVICE. NOTICE SHALL BE GIVEN AT LEAST 2 WORKING DAYS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE IDENTITY AND LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AS ACCURATELY AS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY. THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE CITY ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR DEPTHS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. IF DAMAGE IS CAUSED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR OF THE SAME AND FOR ANY RESULTING CONTINGENT DAMAGE. 4. LOCATION, SUPPORT, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5. WHEN UNKNOWN OR INCORRECTLY LOCATED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER AND THE CITY ENGINEER. 6. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING MAY BE IN THE VICINITY OF THIS PROJECT. CONTACT THE CITY OF DUBLIN, DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AT 410 -4637, TWO DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. TRAFFIC CONTROL 1. TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE FURNISHED, ERECTED, MAINTAINED, AND REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDING TO OHIO MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (OMUTCD), CURRENT EDITION. 2. ALL TRAFFIC LANES OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS SHALL BE FULLY OPEN TO TRAFFIC FROM 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM AND FROM 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM UNLESS AUTHORIZED DIFFERENTLY BY THE CITY ENGINEER. AT ALL OTHER HOURS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN MINIMUM ONE -LANE TWO -WAY TRAFFIC. UNIFORMED, OFF -DUTY POLICE OFFICERS SHALL REPLACE FLAGMEN DESIGNATED BY THE OMUTCD, AND SHALL BE PRESENT WHENEVER ONE -LANE, TWO -WAY TRAFFIC CONTROL IS IN EFFECT. POLICE CRUISERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 3. IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES THAT THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT PROVIDING PROPER PROVISIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL, THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL ASSIGN UNIFORMED, OFF -DUTY POLICE OFFICERS TO THE PROJECT AT NO COST TO THE CITY. 4. STEADY - BURNING, TYPE "C" LIGHTS SHALL BE REQUIRED ON ALL BARRICADES, DRUMS, AND SIMILAR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN USE AT NIGHT. 5. ACCESS FROM PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES FOR EXISTING RESIDENTS OR BUSINESSES SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT FOR MAIL, PUBLIC WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, AND EMERGENCY VEHICLES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DETAILING THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC PROCEDURES. THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN MUST INCORPORATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL DETAILS CONTAINED HEREIN. THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. THE CONTRACTOR OR DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE OHIO EPA. THE NOI MUST BE SUBMITTED TO OEPA 45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAY ENTITLE COVERAGE UNDER THE OHIO EPA GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. A PROJECT LOCATION MAP MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE NOI. A SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL IF A SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN INCLUDED WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. THIS PLAN MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. THE DESIGN OF EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS SHALL FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF OHIO EPA, ITEM 207 OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE CITY ENGINEER. AN INDIVIDUAL NPDES STORMWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE PERMITTEE. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROL AT ALL POINTS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF LEAVES THE PROJECT, INCLUDING WATERWAYS, OVERLAND SHEET FLOW, AND STORM SEWERS. 3. ACCEPTED METHODS OF PROVIDING EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SEDIMENT BASINS, SILT FILTER FENCE, AGGREGATE CHECK DAMS, AND TEMPORARY GROUND COVER. HAY OR STRAW BALES ARE NOT PERMITTED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OF THE WORK AREA AT ALL TIMES CONSISTENT WITH EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 5. DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR 30 DAYS OR MORE SHALL BE SEEDED OR PROTECTED WITHIN SEVEN CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DISTURBANCE. OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROLS THAT ARE INSTALLED SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VEGETATIVE GROWTH HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT DEVICES AT THE CONCLUSION OF CONSTRUCTION BUT NOT BEFORE GROWTH OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER. BLASTING (IF PERMITTEDa 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN A BLASTING PERMIT FROM WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BLASTING FOR ROCK EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT BLASTING REPORTS UPON COMPLETION OF BLASTING TO THE CITY ENGINEER, THE OWNER, AND THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. TOP OF ROCK ELEVATIONS SHALL BE SHOWN ON "AS-BUILT" CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. SANITARY SEWERS 1. CONNECTIONS TO THE SANITARY SEWER WILL BE PERMITTED UPON RECEIVING AN OEPA PERMIT TO INSTALL (PTI), AND UPON RECEIVING A SATISFACTORY LETTER FROM THE DESIGN ENGINEER STATING THAT THE PROJECT HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AS PER THE PLANS, AND ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE PTI HAVE BEEN MET. THE DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED OHIO EPA APPROVALS AND PAYING REVIEW FEES. 2. SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES, REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO EPA, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE GREAT LAKES -UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BOARD (TEN STATES) - RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR WASTEWATER FACILITIES. GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS SHEET 3. THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITH DIAMETERS 15 INCHES AND SMALLER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ASTM C76 CLASS 3, OR PVC SEWER PIPE ASTM D3034, SDR 35. PIPE FOR 6 -INCH DIAMETER HOUSE SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PVC PIPE ASTM D3034, SDR 35. PVC PIPE SHALL NOT BE USED AT DEPTHS GREATER THAN 28 FEET. PIPE MATERIALS AND RELATED STRUCTURES SHALL BE SHOP TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION DIVISION QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4. THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH DIAMETERS GREATER THAN 15 INCHES SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE ASTM C76 WITH CLASS DESIGNATION SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 5. ALL IN LINE WYE AND TEE CONNECTIONS IN CONCRETE SEWERS, 18 -INCH DIAMETER AND LARGER, SHALL BE EITHER KOR N TEE OR KOR N SEAL CONNECTIONS CONFORMING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. GRANULAR BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL ACCORDING TO ITEM 912 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR CONTROLLED DENSITY BACKFILL ACCORDING TO ITEM 636, TYPE III OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 7. ALL MANHOLE LIDS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONTINUOUS SELF SEALING GASKETS. THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW WHERE BOLT DOWN LIDS ARE REQUIRED. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND CONFORM TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN SANITARY MANHOLE STANDARD DRAWING. MANHOLE LIDS SHALL INCLUDE CITY OF DUBLIN LOGO. 8. ALL PVC SEWER PIPES SHALL BE DEFLECTION TESTED NO LESS THAN 60 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF BACKFILLING OPERATIONS. ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO ITEM 901.21 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 9. TEMPORARY BULKHEADS SHALL BE PLACED IN PIPES AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE PERMIT TO INSTALL (PTI) HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE OEPA AND THE SEWERS HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR USE BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THE COST FOR FURNISHING INSTALLING MAINTAINING, AND REMOVING BULKHEADS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT UNIT BID PRICE FOR THE VARIOUS SANITARY SEWER ITEMS. 10. ALL SANITARY SEWERS INCLUDING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO AND PASS INFILTRATION OR EXFILTRATION TESTS ACCORDING TO ITEM 901 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND MUST BE APPROVED FOR USE BY THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE ANY SERVICE CONNECTIONS ARE TAPPED INTO SEWERS. 11. FOR SANITARY SEWER INFILTRATION, LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 GALLONS PER INCH OF TRIBUTARY SEWER DIAMETER PER 24 HOURS PER MILE OF LENGTH OR THE COMPUTED EQUIVALENT. ALL SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE TESTED. 12. AT THE DETERMINATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM A TV INSPECTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. THIS WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. 13. VISIBLE LEAKS OR OTHER DEFECTS OBSERVED OR DISCOVERED DURING TV INSPECTION SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. 14. ROOF DRAINS, FOUNDATION DRAINS, FIELD TILE OR OTHER CLEAN WATER CONNECTIONS TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ARE STRICTLY PROHIBITED ACCORDING TO SECTION 51.23 OF THE DUBLIN CODE OF ORDINANCES. 15. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND 18 INCHES VERTICALLY, FROM SANITARY SEWERS AND STORM SEWERS, TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICABLE. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS CROSS WATER MAINS OR OTHER SEWERS OR OTHER UTILITIES, TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE PIPES CROSSING AND SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL ACCORDING TO ITEM 912 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT A WATER LINE MUST CROSS WITHIN 18 INCHES OF A SANITARY SEWER, THE SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONCRETE ENCASED OR CONSIST OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE MATERIAL. 16. SERVICE RISERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE THE DEPTH FROM WYES TO PROPOSED GROUND ELEVATION EXCEEDS 10 FEET. TOPS OF RISERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 9 FEET BELOW PROPOSED GROUND ELEVATION IF BASEMENT SERVICE IS INTENDED. 17. WHERE SERVICE RISERS ARE NOT INSTALLED, A MINIMUM 5 FOOT LENGTH OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE OF THE SAME SIZE AS THE WYE OPENING SHALL BE INSTALLED. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND PLACE, AS DIRECTED, APPROVED WYE POLES MADE OF 2 INCHES X 2 INCHES LUMBER AT ALL WYE LOCATIONS, ENDS OF EXTENDED SERVICES, OR AT THE END OF EACH RISER WHERE RISERS ARE REQUIRED. WYE POLES SHALL BE VISIBLE BEFORE ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. THE COST OF THESE POLES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE FOR THE VARIOUS SEWER ITEMS. 19. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER FLOWS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. COSTS FOR PUMPING AND BYPASSING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE RELATED ITEMS. 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND LABOR TO MAKE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES. THE SEWER PIPE TO MANHOLE CONNECTIONS FOR ALL SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE FLEXIBLE AND WATERTIGHT. ALL HOLES SHALL BE NEATLY CORED. THE SEWER PIPE BARREL AT THE SPRINGLINE SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 1 INCH BEYOND THE INSIDE FACE OF THE MANHOLE. TO MAINTAIN FLEXIBILITY IN THE CONNECTION, A 1 INCH SPACE SHALL BE LEFT BETWEEN THE END OF THE PIPE INSIDE THE MANHOLE AND THE CONCRETE CHANNEL; THIS SPACE SHALL BE FILLED WITH A WATERPROOF FLEXIBLE JOINT FILLER. ANY METAL THAT IS USED SHALL BE TYPE 300 SERIES STAINLESS STEEL. THE CONNECTION MAY BE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING TYPES: A. RUBBER SLEEVE WITH STAINLESS STEEL BANDING. 1. KOR N SEAL AS MANUFACTURED BY NATIONAL POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. 2. LOCK JOINT FLEXIBLE MANHOLE SLEEVE AS MANUFACTURED BY INTERPACE CORPORATION. 3. OR EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. B. RUBBER GASKET COMPRESSION. 1. PRESS WEDGE II AS MANUFACTURED BY PRESS SEAL GASKET CORPORATION. 2. DURA SEAL III AS MANUFACTURED BY DURA TECH, INC. 3. LINK SEAL AS MANUFACTURED BY THUNDERLINE CORPORATION. 4. OR EQUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THE COST FOR THIS WORK ALONG WITH A NEW CHANNELIZED BASE FOR THE MANHOLE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT BID PRICE FOR THE RELATED ITEMS OF WORK. WATER LINE 1. ALL WATER LINE MATERIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER. 2. ALL PUBLIC WATER PIPE WITH A DIAMETER 3 INCHES TO 8 INCHES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 53. PUBLIC WATER PIPE 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER OR LARGER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 54. PUBLIC WATER PIPE 20 INCHES IN DIAMETER OR LARGER MAY BE PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PIPE. PRIVATE WATER PIPE SHALL MEET THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 3. ONLY FIRE HYDRANTS CONFORMING TO CITY OF COLUMBUS STANDARDS WILL BE APPROVED FOR USE. 4. PUBLIC WATER LINES SHALL BE DISINFECTED BY THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER. REQUESTS FOR WATER LINE CHLORINATION SHALL BE MADE THROUGH THE CITY OF DUBLIN DIVISION OF ENGINEERING. THE COST FOR CHLORINATION SHALL BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DISINFECTED ACCORDING TO ITEM 801.13 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. SPECIAL ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATION C_651, PARTICULARLY FOR FLUSHING (SECTION 5) AND FOR CHLORINATING VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANTS (SECTION 7). PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 801.12 OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, WHEN WATER LINES ARE READY FOR DISINFECTION, THE CITY OF DUBLIN SHALL SUBMIT TWO (2) SETS OF "AS- BUILT" PLANS, AND A LETTER STATING THAT THE WATER LINES HAVE BEEN PRESSURE TESTED AND NEED TO BE DISINFECTED, TO THE CITY OF COLUMBUS, DIVISION OF WATER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DISINFECTION OF ALL WATER LINES CONSTRUCTION PER THIS PLAN. PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 801.12 OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL FIRE HYDRANTS ACCORDING TO CITY OF DUBLIN STANDARDS. THE COST OF PAINTING FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE FOR FIRE HYDRANTS. 7. NO WATER TAPS OR SERVICE CONNECTIONS (E.G., TO CURB STOPS OR METER PITS) MAY BE ISSUED UNTIL ADJACENT PUBLIC WATER LINES SERVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAVE BEEN DISINFECTED BY THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER AND HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. A TAP PERMIT FOR EACH WATER SERVICE MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER BEFORE MAKING ANY TAPS INTO PUBLIC WATER LINES. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER AT 645_7788 AND THE CITY OF DUBLIN DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AT LEAST 24 HOURS BEFORE TAPPING INTO EXISTING WATER LINES. 9. ALL WATER MAIN STATIONING SHALL BE BASED ON STREET CENTERLINE STATIONING. 10. ALL BENDS, JOINT DEFLECTIONS AND FITTINGS SHALL BE BACKED WITH CONCRETE PER CITY OF COLUMBUS STANDARDS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 1 WORKING DAY BUT NOT MORE THAN 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO ANY TEMPORARY INTERRUPTION OF WATER SERVICE. INTERRUPTION OF WATER SERVICE SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 12. WATER METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE PROPOSED STRUCTURES UNLESS A METER PIT INSTALLATION IS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER. METER PITS MUST CONFORM TO STANDARD DRAWINGS L -7103, A &B FOR 5/8" THROUGH 1" METERS OR L- 6317, A, B, C &D FOR 1 -1/2" OR LARGER METERS. 13. WATER LINES TO BE INSTALLED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS SHALL BE PLACED AFTER THE EMBANKMENT HAS BEEN PLACED AND COMPACTED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 14. CURB STOP BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED AT LEAST 1 FOOT INSIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SET AT FINISHED GRADE. 15. IF THE TOP OF THE OPERATING NUT OF ANY VALVE IS GREATER THAN 36 INCHES BELOW FINISHED GRADE, AN EXTENSION STEM SHALL BE FURNISHED TO BRING THE TOP OF THE OPERATING NUT TO WITHIN 24 INCHES OF FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION. 16. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4 FEET MEASURED FROM TOP OF FINISHED GRADE TO TOP OF WATER LINE, WATER LINES SHALL BE SET DEEPER AT ALL POINTS WHERE NECESSARY TO CLEAR EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY LINES OR OTHER UNDERGROUND RESTRICTIONS BY A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES. 17. TWO %4 INCH TAPS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE END OF THE LINE ON ALL DEAD -END WATER LINES. STORM SEWER 1. ALL STORM WATER DETENTION AND RETENTION AREAS AND MAJOR FLOOD ROUTING SWALES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO FINISH GRADE AND HYDRO-SEEDED AND HYDRO-MULCHED ACCORDING TO ITEMS 203 AND 659 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. WHERE PRIVATE STORM SEWERS CONNECT TO PUBLIC STORM SEWERS, THE LAST RUN OF PRIVATE STORM SEWER CONNECTING TO THE PUBLIC STORM SEWER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM DESIGNATION C76, WALL B, CLASS IV FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 12 INCHES TO 15 INCHES, CLASS III FOR 18 INCHES TO 24 INCH PIPES, AND 27 INCHES AND LARGER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS II, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN'S DIVISION OF ENGINEERING. 3. GRANULAR BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL ACCORDING TO ITEM 912 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OR CONTROLLED DENSITY BACKFILL ACCORDING TO ITEM 636, TYPE III OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 4. ALL STORM SEWERS SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM DESIGNATION C76, WALL B, CLASS IV FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 12 INCHES TO 15 INCHES, CLASS III FOR 18 INCHES TO 24 INCH PIPES, AND 27 INCHES AND LARGER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS II, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 5. HEADWALLS AND ENDWALLS SHALL BE REQUIRED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLETS OR OUTLETS TO AND FROM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. NATURAL STONE AND /OR BRICK APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL VISIBLE HEADWALLS AND /OR ENDWALLS SURFACES. 6. STORM INLETS OR CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CHANNELIZED AND HAVE BICYCLE SAFE GRATES. MANHOLE LIDS SHALL INCLUDE CITY OF DUBLIN LOGO AND ALL CURB INLET AND CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL INCLUDE ENGRAVED LETTERING: 'DUMP NO WASTE; DRAINS TO RIVER." 7. STORM SEWER OUTLETS GREATER THAN 18 INCHES IN DIAMETER ACCESSIBLE FROM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES OR WATERCOURSES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SAFETY GRATES, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. MAIL DELIVERY 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT US MAIL DELIVERY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS IS NOT DISRUPTED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS LIMITED TO RELOCATION OF MAILBOXES TO A TEMPORARY LOCATION THAT WILL ALLOW THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND SHALL ALSO INCLUDE THE RESTORATION OF MAILBOXES TO THEIR ORIGINAL LOCATION OR APPROVED NEW LOCATION. ANY RELOCATION OF MAILBOX SERVICES MUST BE FIRST COORDINATED WITH THE US POSTAL SERVICE AND THE HOMEOWNER. 2. BEFORE RELOCATING ANY MAILBOXES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE U.S, POSTAL SERVICE AND RELOCATE MAILBOXES ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE POSTAL SERVICE. USE OF FIRE HYDRANTS 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE PROPER ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE DUBLIN SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND THE COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER FOR THE USE OF FIRE HYDRANTS WHEN USED FOR WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT AND PROVIDE THE CITY OF DUBLIN A COPY OF THE HYDRANT USAGE PERMIT OBTAINED FROM THE CITY OF COLUMBUS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO SEND A COPIES OF PERMITS OBTAINED FROM DUBLIN AND COLUMBUS TO THE WASHINGTON AND /OR PERRY TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPARTMENT. PERMITS SHALL BE KEPT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. BEFORE THE FINAL ESTIMATE IS PAID, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER FROM THE CITY OF COLUMBUS DIVISION OF WATER TO THE CITY ENGINEER STATING THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAS RETURNED THE SIAMESE VALVE TO THE CITY OF COLUMBUS AND HAS PAID ALL COSTS ARISING FROM THE USE OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS. BORROW MATERIAL & SURPLUS EXCAVATION NOTE THE SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE FINAL GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS. WHERE NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SUITABLE BORROW MATERIAL ON -SITE OR OFF -SITE AS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE SITE CONSTRUCTION AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL SURPLUS EXCAVATION ON SITE AND, IF NECESSARY, SHALL HAUL SURPLUS EXCAVATED MATERIAL AWAY FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY. SANDS DECKER CPS / � 4g s OAR � F � W 1 CL Z� r� O a Z W m W 0 5 s C 7 �L L C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings a Pe oning/PDP 08/01111 IN Informal PU 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number Sheet Title GENERALNOTES Sheet Number C2.1 4" — ITEM 608, CLASS "C" CONCRETE WALK 1.56% )/2" CRO SLOP )/2" 000000000000000000000 00000000000000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FF ITEM 204, SUBGRADE 4" ITEM 304, COMPACTION AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE SAWCUT AT 15' MAX ITEM 452, 6" SPACING TO Y4 DEPTH ` NON- REINFORCED AB OF SL THICKNESS 1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 - 0 0 0 ° o ° O ° o o o o 0 0 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 c c o 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ITEM 204, SUBGRADE J 4 — ITEM 304, COMPACTION AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE ITEM 451, 8" CONCRETE SAWCUT AT 15' MAX SLAB WITH 6X6, SPACING TO Y DEPTH W2.9 X W2.9 W.W.F. OF SLAB THICKNESS 48' 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0 o _0_0 °0 °o`ro °000 °o °o °000°0< 8" - ITEM 304, L ITEM 204, SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTION THICKENED SLAB TO BE PROVIDED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER LOADING DOCK APPROACH & PAD NOT TO SCALE 1. 1Y" - ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, SURFACE COURSE TYPE 1, PG -64 -22 2. 1Y" — ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, INTERMEDIATE COURSE TYPE 2, PG -64 -22 3. ITEM 408, PRIME COAT (0.35 GAL /SY) 4. 8" — ITEM 304, AGGREGATE BASE 5. ITEM 204, SUBGRADE COMPACTION STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 1. 1Y" - ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, SURFACE COURSE TYPE 1, PG -64 -22 2. 2Yz" — ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, INTERMEDIATE COURSE TYPE 2, PG -54 -22 3. ITEM 408, PRIME COAT (0.35 GAL /SY) 4. 10" — ITEM 304, AGGREGATE BASE 5. ITEM 204, SUBGRADE COMPACTION HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 4" — ITEM 608, CLASS 3 "C" CONCRETE WALK NOTE WITH REINFORCEMENT ITEM 451, 8" �6 TOOLED 1.56% 1/2 "R z SIDEWALK ° JOINT CROSS SLOE �a m 48" co PAVEMENT ° _s.. ".. o 0 ° 0 ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 - .000000 21" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 GRATE �0 0' 0 \ o \ Z" z ITEM 204, 4" ITEM 304, ° - U ° U 0 0 0 0 00 0O 0O 0G 0 6" SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE 10 m COMPACTION INTEGRAL CURB & SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE SAWCUT AT 15' MAX ITEM 452, 6" SPACING TO Y4 DEPTH ` NON- REINFORCED AB OF SL THICKNESS 1 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 - 0 0 0 ° o ° O ° o o o o 0 0 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 c c o 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ITEM 204, SUBGRADE J 4 — ITEM 304, COMPACTION AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE ITEM 451, 8" CONCRETE SAWCUT AT 15' MAX SLAB WITH 6X6, SPACING TO Y DEPTH W2.9 X W2.9 W.W.F. OF SLAB THICKNESS 48' 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 0 o _0_0 °0 °o`ro °000 °o °o °000°0< 8" - ITEM 304, L ITEM 204, SUBGRADE AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTION THICKENED SLAB TO BE PROVIDED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER LOADING DOCK APPROACH & PAD NOT TO SCALE 1. 1Y" - ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, SURFACE COURSE TYPE 1, PG -64 -22 2. 1Y" — ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, INTERMEDIATE COURSE TYPE 2, PG -64 -22 3. ITEM 408, PRIME COAT (0.35 GAL /SY) 4. 8" — ITEM 304, AGGREGATE BASE 5. ITEM 204, SUBGRADE COMPACTION STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 1. 1Y" - ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, SURFACE COURSE TYPE 1, PG -64 -22 2. 2Yz" — ITEM 448, ASPHALT CONCRETE, INTERMEDIATE COURSE TYPE 2, PG -54 -22 3. ITEM 408, PRIME COAT (0.35 GAL /SY) 4. 10" — ITEM 304, AGGREGATE BASE 5. ITEM 204, SUBGRADE COMPACTION HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 6" 5" * 1" JOINT Y4 SEALANT a .O * PREFORMED JOINT MATERIAL ITEM 705.03 CONCRETE CURB TYPE 6, ITEM 609 * ONLY WHERE CONCRETE CURB MEETS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE CURB NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 3 N NOTE 0000 ITEM 451, 8" CONCRETE TRENCH z SIDEWALK ° 36" �a m 48" DRAIN WITH 4" OUTLET, CONTRACTOR AT ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN 21" CONCRETE To ORIENT AXIS To FOLLOW PAVEMENT AS SHOWN GRATE �0 0' 0 PAVEMENT o P 0 Z" z STRUCTURE AND SHALL ° - U ° U 0 0 0 0 00 0O 0O 0G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o o %O %O% % ° oo 6 10 m 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 o DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP CENTER IN TRENCH WITH SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM *FLARE WIDTH 1OX CURB HEIGHT 0% \ GEOTEXTLE CLASS B FILTER i'A RAMP MUST COMPLY WITH ADAAG JO /// 0000 Oa WHEEL CHAIR RAMP 00 0V ITEM 204, 4 IT 304, �, AGGREGATE BASE O� NOT To SCALE -J -, -:° "- 2J /O SUBGRADE /� q v3 gw o ` 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 °° 0 ° 0 ° 0 mr O� 6" 5" * 1" JOINT Y4 SEALANT a .O * PREFORMED JOINT MATERIAL ITEM 705.03 CONCRETE CURB TYPE 6, ITEM 609 * ONLY WHERE CONCRETE CURB MEETS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE CURB NOT TO SCALE NOES: • A MINIMUM CONCRETE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IS RECOMMENDED. THE CONCRETE SHOULD BE VIBRATED TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS. • THE FINISHED LEVEL OF THE CONCRETE SURROUND MUST BE APPROX. Y8' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL EDGE. • REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S LATEST INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. • TRENCH DRAIN & GRATE TO BE HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATED. TRENCH DRAIN / NOT TO SCALE 1' A 4.5 BASE N NOTE 0000 ITEM 451, 8" <D TRENCH 30" 36" REINFORCED 48" DRAIN WITH 4" OUTLET, CONTRACTOR AT ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN 21" CONCRETE To ORIENT AXIS To FOLLOW PAVEMENT AS SHOWN GRATE �0 0' 5i MAJOR DRAINAGE SWALE ABOVE. UNDERDRAINS SHALL PAVEMENT Z P 78" 83" UO�a 0000U 0 ° STRUCTURE AND SHALL ° - U ° U 0 0 0 0 00 0O 0O 0G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o o %O %O% % ° oo 6 10 6' - 6 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 o CENTER IN TRENCH WITH SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM / 0% \ GEOTEXTLE CLASS B FILTER C0OO 0000 00 /// 0000 Oa 0 o 00 0V ITEM 204, 4 IT 304, �, AGGREGATE BASE O� 00 00 °• T' - -, -:° "- 0 0 ° o /O SUBGRADE /� TYV VA o ` 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 ° 0 °° 0 ° 0 ° 0 jA COMPACTION A VM O� oC 0 0 0 0 0 O %� NOES: • A MINIMUM CONCRETE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI IS RECOMMENDED. THE CONCRETE SHOULD BE VIBRATED TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS. • THE FINISHED LEVEL OF THE CONCRETE SURROUND MUST BE APPROX. Y8' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL EDGE. • REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S LATEST INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. • TRENCH DRAIN & GRATE TO BE HEAVY DUTY TRAFFIC RATED. TRENCH DRAIN / NOT TO SCALE 4 i< 1 -- ::�� s 2 CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.) 8" THICK CONCRETE 2' COLLAR 1" CHAMFER 00000000 ° 00000000 6" MIN. ITEM 304 ° COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (SEE NOTES) NOTES: 1. HOT APPLIED JOINT SEALER ITEM 705.04 & EXPANSION JOINT 2. HOT APPLIED JOINT SEALER ITEM 705.04, PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT IF SURROUNDING PAVEMENT IS CONCRETE 3. COLLAR TO BE USED ON ALL CATCH BASINS & MANHOLES IN PAVEMENT AREAS. 4. CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM 4000 PSI, AIR - ENTRAINED & INCLUDE SILICA FUME MEETING ITEM 701.10. 5, AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS NEEDED TO EXTEND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASE FOR THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURE COLLAR /, NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1. ITEM NUMBERS REFER TO STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AGGREGATE FOR BEDDING IS WASHED SANDY GRAVEL #68, #7 OR #8, ITEM 701 3. TYPE A BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 304, GRADE A. TYPE A BACKFILL SHALL BE USED WHEN THE TRENCH IS 5' OR LESS FROM ANY PAVED OR GRAVEL SURFACE, OR BENEATH THE PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL.. COMPACTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 201 4. TYPE B BACKFILL SHALL BE NATURAL SOIL FREE FROM STONES LARGER THAN 2" ACROSS THEIR GREATEST DIMENSION, TOPSOIL, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, OR FROZEN MATERIAL, COMPACTED TO 95% OF ITS MAXIMUM LABORATORY DRY WEIGHT. 5. TYPE C BACKFILL SHALL BE NATURAL SOIL FREE FROM STONES LARGER THAN 6" ACROSS THEIR GREATEST DIMENSION, TOPSOIL, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, OR FROZEN MATERIAL, COMPACTED TO 90% OF ITS MAXIMUM LABORATORY DRY WEIGHT. WHEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, STONES NO LARGER THAN ONE CUBIC FOOT MAY BE DEPOSITED AT LEAST 3' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE, 6. THE EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH 12" ABOVE THE CONDUIT MAY BE INCREASED WITHOUT EXTRA COMPENSATION. 7. COVER OVER PIPE SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ROOF DRAINS SHALL HAVE 30" MIN. COVER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL HAVE 48" MIN. COVER. * LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT APPLY ONLY WHEN CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR UNIT PRICE PAYMENT OF PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND SEEDING & MULCHING. TYPICAL TRENCH FOR PVC STORM & SANITARY PIPE NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE SEE NOTE N TYPE "B" BACKFILL NOTE: FOR TRENCH AND BEDDING DETAIL SEE DWG. Sa.S. -1. NEENAH R -1977 OR EQUIVALENT WATERTIGHT 1 „ STOPPER ' CLASS "C„ I I CONCRETE MN N 6 PROVIDE ONE LAYER OF 10„ VISQUENE (OR EQUIVALENT) 16 AROUND RISER PIPE TO 6" — 45 BEND PREVENT BONDING OF SECTION (OR TWO 22Yz) RISER PIPE TO CONCRETE CASING. (APPROX. WT. PLUG 5" WYE BRANCH 110 LBS) o � HARDWOOD BLOCKING ISOMETRIC END ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION CLEANOUT FRAME & LID NOTE: CLEANOUT TOP OF CASTING SHALL BE SET FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND 2" MIN. TO 4" MAX.. ABOVE FINISHED GRADE IN NON —PAVED AREAS. SANITARY CLEANOUT r NOT TO SCALE STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR _ CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED CRZ = CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 1 -FOOT FOR EVERY INCH OF DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT OVER 6 -INCH CALIPER TREE. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL TREE FENCING INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. TREE PROTECTION FENCING IBILITY BARRIER OR LACING QED) NCE T 5' OC. NOT TO SCALE I ��IV�r II�Iv MIN. TRENCH WIDTH * LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT APPLY ONLY WHEN CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR UNIT PRICE PAYMENT OF PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND SEEDING & MULCHING. • 1�^ FOUNDATION: WHERE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER & REPLACE WITH A FOUNDATION OF CLASS I OR II MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWER & OTHER GRAVITY -FLOW APPLICATIONS', LATEST EDITION. AS AN ALTERNATIVE & AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER, TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BE STABILIZED USING WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III, & INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER, MIN. BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" FOR 4' -24" & 42" -48" PIPE & 6" FOR 30 " -36" PIPE. HAUNCHING & INITIAL BACKFILL SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III, & INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION, TRENCH WIDTHS: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER MIN, RECOMMENDED TRENCH WIDTHS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: DIAMETER AGGREGATE BASE N NOTE 0000 15" <D INSTALL 10' LENGTHS OF 12" CATC 30" 36" 12" PANEL -TYPE UNDERDRAIN BASIN PANEL -TYPE UNDERDRAIN 48" 0 000 WITH 4" OUTLET, CONTRACTOR AT ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN 21" o To ORIENT AXIS To FOLLOW PAVEMENT AS SHOWN 28" �0 0' 5i MAJOR DRAINAGE SWALE ABOVE. UNDERDRAINS SHALL 3" TYP Z AT 1.0% TOWARD THE 78" 83" 0 STRUCTURE AND SHALL (3) HOLES @ 4.1" 0 0 10' HAVE THE UPSTREAM END 00 0 12" PANEL —TYPE UNDERDRAIN; TYP. PLUGGED. UNDERDRAIN CENTER IN TRENCH WITH SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM / 2 COLUMNS GEOTEXTLE CLASS B FILTER C0OO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC 0000 No. 8 AGGREGATE AFTER INSTALLATION. 0 o 6 " WOO ATTACH TO HEADWALL FINGER DRAIN WITH Y88 "z 2" S,S, BOLTS V NOT TO SCALE 4 i< 1 -- ::�� s 2 CONTRACTION JOINT (TYP.) 8" THICK CONCRETE 2' COLLAR 1" CHAMFER 00000000 ° 00000000 6" MIN. ITEM 304 ° COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (SEE NOTES) NOTES: 1. HOT APPLIED JOINT SEALER ITEM 705.04 & EXPANSION JOINT 2. HOT APPLIED JOINT SEALER ITEM 705.04, PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINT IF SURROUNDING PAVEMENT IS CONCRETE 3. COLLAR TO BE USED ON ALL CATCH BASINS & MANHOLES IN PAVEMENT AREAS. 4. CONCRETE SHALL BE MINIMUM 4000 PSI, AIR - ENTRAINED & INCLUDE SILICA FUME MEETING ITEM 701.10. 5, AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS NEEDED TO EXTEND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BASE FOR THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURE COLLAR /, NOT TO SCALE NOTES 1. ITEM NUMBERS REFER TO STATE OF OHIO, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AGGREGATE FOR BEDDING IS WASHED SANDY GRAVEL #68, #7 OR #8, ITEM 701 3. TYPE A BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 304, GRADE A. TYPE A BACKFILL SHALL BE USED WHEN THE TRENCH IS 5' OR LESS FROM ANY PAVED OR GRAVEL SURFACE, OR BENEATH THE PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL.. COMPACTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 201 4. TYPE B BACKFILL SHALL BE NATURAL SOIL FREE FROM STONES LARGER THAN 2" ACROSS THEIR GREATEST DIMENSION, TOPSOIL, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, OR FROZEN MATERIAL, COMPACTED TO 95% OF ITS MAXIMUM LABORATORY DRY WEIGHT. 5. TYPE C BACKFILL SHALL BE NATURAL SOIL FREE FROM STONES LARGER THAN 6" ACROSS THEIR GREATEST DIMENSION, TOPSOIL, VEGETATION, DEBRIS, RUBBISH, OR FROZEN MATERIAL, COMPACTED TO 90% OF ITS MAXIMUM LABORATORY DRY WEIGHT. WHEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, STONES NO LARGER THAN ONE CUBIC FOOT MAY BE DEPOSITED AT LEAST 3' ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE, 6. THE EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH 12" ABOVE THE CONDUIT MAY BE INCREASED WITHOUT EXTRA COMPENSATION. 7. COVER OVER PIPE SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ROOF DRAINS SHALL HAVE 30" MIN. COVER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL HAVE 48" MIN. COVER. * LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT APPLY ONLY WHEN CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR UNIT PRICE PAYMENT OF PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND SEEDING & MULCHING. TYPICAL TRENCH FOR PVC STORM & SANITARY PIPE NOT TO SCALE FINISHED GRADE SEE NOTE N TYPE "B" BACKFILL NOTE: FOR TRENCH AND BEDDING DETAIL SEE DWG. Sa.S. -1. NEENAH R -1977 OR EQUIVALENT WATERTIGHT 1 „ STOPPER ' CLASS "C„ I I CONCRETE MN N 6 PROVIDE ONE LAYER OF 10„ VISQUENE (OR EQUIVALENT) 16 AROUND RISER PIPE TO 6" — 45 BEND PREVENT BONDING OF SECTION (OR TWO 22Yz) RISER PIPE TO CONCRETE CASING. (APPROX. WT. PLUG 5" WYE BRANCH 110 LBS) o � HARDWOOD BLOCKING ISOMETRIC END ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION CLEANOUT FRAME & LID NOTE: CLEANOUT TOP OF CASTING SHALL BE SET FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND 2" MIN. TO 4" MAX.. ABOVE FINISHED GRADE IN NON —PAVED AREAS. SANITARY CLEANOUT r NOT TO SCALE STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR _ CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED CRZ = CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 1 -FOOT FOR EVERY INCH OF DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT OVER 6 -INCH CALIPER TREE. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL TREE FENCING INSTALLATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. TREE PROTECTION FENCING IBILITY BARRIER OR LACING QED) NCE T 5' OC. NOT TO SCALE I ��IV�r II�Iv MIN. TRENCH WIDTH * LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT APPLY ONLY WHEN CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR UNIT PRICE PAYMENT OF PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT AND SEEDING & MULCHING. • 1�^ FOUNDATION: WHERE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER & REPLACE WITH A FOUNDATION OF CLASS I OR II MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWER & OTHER GRAVITY -FLOW APPLICATIONS', LATEST EDITION. AS AN ALTERNATIVE & AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER, TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BE STABILIZED USING WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III, & INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER, MIN. BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" FOR 4' -24" & 42" -48" PIPE & 6" FOR 30 " -36" PIPE. HAUNCHING & INITIAL BACKFILL SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III, & INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION, TRENCH WIDTHS: UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER MIN, RECOMMENDED TRENCH WIDTHS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: DIAMETER 4" 6" 8" 10" 12' 15" 18" 24" 30" 36" 42" 48" 60" MIN. WIDTH 21" 23" 25" 28" 31" 34" 39" 48" 65" 78" 83" 89" 102" THE EXCAVATED TRENCH WIDTH TWELVE INCHES (12 ") ABOVE THE CONDUIT MAY BE INCREASED WITHOUT EXTRA COMPENSATION, MINIMUM COVER: MIN. RECOMMENDED DEPTHS OF COVER FOR VARIOUS LIVE LOADING CONDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM TOP OF PIPE TO GROUND SURFACE. SURFACE LIVE LOADING CONDITION H25 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) H25 RIGID PAVEMENT) E80 RAILWAY HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MIN. COVER 12" ** 12" 24" 48" ** TOP OF PIPE TO BOTTOM OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION TYPICAL TRENCH CORRUGATED PE PIPE NOT TO SCALE 18" OUTLET PIPE • i ' _ �o • 21" SQ. X R "T s A09_009 ALUMINUM PLATE o/ Sheet Title — �o SITE DETAILS LL 3" ORIFICE DECKER 904.30 �d CPS 904.18 00- / (3) HOLES @ 4.1" 903.84 00 / O.C. SPACING / 2 COLUMNS 903.50 � Q Q� � 0 1'72 WOO ATTACH TO HEADWALL ORIFICE WITH Y88 "z 2" S,S, BOLTS AND ANCHORS WITH S.S. NUTS & WASHERS OF AMNAII THE OUTLET CONTROL DEVICE WILL BE INSTALLED AT STORM STRUCTURE 3 AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE LIFE OF THE STORM SYSTEM. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE DETENTION BASIN BE PUMPED OR DRAINED INTO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE WAY OR EXISTING STORM SYSTEM WITHOUT PROPER FILTERING TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM POLLUTING EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. OUTLET CONTROL DEVICE NOT TO SCALE CL _ LL Z� r_ O a LU w LU 5 s 7 "L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings E3 12ezoning/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 * 20' LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT OF SEEDING & MULCHING * I INUTINIP I INICC rno * 20' LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT OF SEEDING & MULCHING * I IKAITINII I u.ITe rno g Project Number s A09_009 Sheet Title — SANDS SITE DETAILS LL DECKER Sheet Number �d CPS NGINEERS iii SURVEYORS * 20' LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT OF SEEDING & MULCHING * I INUTINIP I INICC rno * 20' LIMITING LINES FOR PAYMENT OF SEEDING & MULCHING * I IKAITINII I u.ITe rno I Of Of w 3 a 0 U z Ws W Zcm no ow � w id r 13 E ED. ED. ST /%� OTELE 15 PEA. 14 1�. E 12 j + i �SA- ♦ 3 ��• )J I 12 ♦ �� /� 1 � 1 + e� 10 )� Ar it ,# I 1 ► ( t(, "y + 2 # # I 1 12 ` # 1 it IE + E {,(tr' I I 1 �n /J I I a + " I ft 1 # Y c, nyi`(t`� + "y IF I \# I lit 7 12 t 1 ^ # h(j+ "4 I ` Ar + L 12 8 1 + 7 \ I 1� I 12 E _- ❑ ,� � 131 3 ' i �` J I alp —�— v,C J I ( + I 12 1 1 ) 1 VOLVO PARKING SCALE: 1" = 30' ST ST C) ST ST ST 2. , ,w 3. W W��„_ W W w OF. VENTURE DRIVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. 2 1 10 12 2 CONCRETE WALK TO BE REMOVED & DISPOSED OF, SAWCUT AT NEAREST JOINT. Y EXISTING CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN SA SA SA SA SA EAST DRIVE SCALE: 1" = 30' KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED & DISPOSED OF. 2. EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN. 3. EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED & DISPOSED OF. 4. EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. 5. EXISTING CONCRETE WALK TO BE REMOVED & DISPOSED OF, SAWCUT AT NEAREST JOINT. 6. EXISTING CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN 7. EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN. 8. EXISTING STEPS TO REMAIN. 9. EXISTING LIGHT TO REMAIN. 10. EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED /RELOCATED. 11. EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN. 12. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE REMOVED, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS. 13. EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE SAWCUT. 14. EXISTING WATER METER PIT TO RELOCATED. 15. EXISTING ELECTRIC STRUCTURE & SERVICE TO BE RELOCATED. 30 15 0 30 NORTH I U. S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 v 1 UKt UK/ Vt KEYNOTES 1. FIRE TRUCK ACCESSING THE BUILDING /SITE. 2. PASSENGER CAR ACCESSING THE CAR WASH. 3. VEHICLE CARRIER ACCESSING THE SERVICE AREA. VEHICLE TRAVEL PATH SCALE: 1" = 60' 30 15 0 30 %J NORTH OHIO Utilities rrotection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) SANDS DECKER CPS iVi"TNRRR C • CT TRIM' CL r— Z� O a LU W m W 0 5 s 0 C 0 • L L C lu'f cV 00 In Drawings a Rezoning/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 g Project Number s A09_009 3 _ Sheet Title DEMOLITION & SITE VEHICLE ACCESS PLAN Y1 0 Sheet Number ❑ a31 C3 \ \ 8 Q� / � N: 765855.4118 / E 1786697.1091 35'R \ 5� / L 22430 CH 220.07' � /W /W /W R/w BM DIST =69 °47 56 E VENTURE DRIVE- - - - �� sg o o , s, p \ -- -- -- -- $ S89 °16'34 "E 1049.81' Off 96.85' - - \ �R� 0 . �, ??SP 19 IFS, 467.62' 34 R 4 3, 5 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x \ e x 53 SPACES " " h � 10'R R- li q 8 , \ 6 o. x x x x x x 477' x x \ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x s _ 6 s a 5 - I� x R_ ,fi � 7 x 3 1 8 - 6 - i .0 .xxzx "xxxzzxxzxxzxx "xzxx zxx 1 7 � o x A. � : 5x _ 5 x 6 z S89 °16'34 "E `Sa9 °16'34 "Ex 10'R 84 � A 26' -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x :x :x :x� `10 R I _ � 589'1634 "E 6 252.45' P5 "' x x 25470' x 2 19T 10R '....... . ,� 25'R 15R ........ .xx.x x......, xx...o x x z�zx: x z <21 SPACES" cn ;v `nx 30" I :::::: ::= %%e%%e �A 8 �� `19SPACESS g .x, �aox x w" :�:': -:-,� :v xxxx x :wi.x z" xx � $ x�x x Q � x :,�_• xx.xx.�R, x x xxx xx .x xx N N ;: s8o zxx :.`" D 5-` I. v -R- 20.00"„ x , \- o „��x, 30 ,max; x .1 x. x xx x.. x 0 6 . x , ' 589 °1 % xx 589 °1x6'34xEX I .M .�. ^x. zx ., x.i. x. -y x x x x.xx..xz v. R�.x ,; L 8019 x x. x , , x,x: .S ° 07'21 "E` °� =x= x. x -•xxx '15'R x x _ ;�X�. J oD I x rn , xxx .. " x x x x "" _ - x z x x x x„ - I�" T 85.49 •- xxx x6991':; � o � x - _N xl xxxxx xxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxz xx I " "" x x , "117.57'• >.x \. z xx x xx � xx L: - xsa �� x�z -x .x so' x x o I "` xR xx xxx 721 "E;, x x x �x.. x xN85 °07'21 " .xx. x. xxx x.. •x. x. x "x 0 x 5 "4681 Qr7 � x xxx xx xx.xxxx xxxxx: ,x xx 19.81' w z I� � O x x x � x r w_ x - xxxx xxzxxzx xxxx x "R 50.00. x x N EL Q o N airo I I „`� x x . -co ." � I x xxx . of x x x --_� , • z : _ - «� x x . , x .. ire ` 15 "w . x x x x x �, ,/„ "U x x. " .. x x S CAR WASH �- -- _ -, R- 33Xso' � -Q :- x w� � i x xa w. `Q x xx xx ' � - 0 N85 °07'21' W L- 45.06' x n ' "k�'S x , N: 765632644.4 I °rn NI�x x . , .I... E 1786841.9520 _ 20.00' SERVICE - - - - -- s _ sas z1 " E- 4 0 66 - DEPT.I sa5 °0 DETAILING -- II z x 11x 5 x . i' IIH y'll - - _ N: 765613.2306 " x x x x . x �\ 45.19' 1787069.4585 E i : ` _ I FUTURE LL ,j EXPANSION LL �o - Y 9 I z. x xr.xx x xx " :QP xx __: N 4 - 5 •s V x � .x15'R � xx xxxx ,3 BMW /MINI I SRx xx - - _ 85 °D�'0 "E m SERVICE 7 ' R x x . x x :x ti x�x x . x x z : x wi E 15 MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP : z : x` ° LL x = ��" -O 72.00' - $ _ x LL - - -- .� sa85oo2 - � r �v. DEPT. - - -- _ i.x 2,E x „ "�,`�� xxx , z - ..x..z 50 _ x S8_5 °07'21_ °E - -iin 50 p� , 35.16' I® ., xx$ - 3 00 xxx x h d 18� 5R ��x P c - �14 mow' % I sR� �'R -° E 5e,� LL 6.79' 8 85 °0721 "ExN = °""'" _ -- " x x , r xx _ .. .. 0 O x x xx x x xx x z x x z, x x x x x ry x z. N x co '- -i_ o �" x x 17 � , � • � � � = - - - -- � SERVICE x ...xx 5 I i t DEPT. �R N I I N 8.00' I II, �' I MINI � �� 5 n R BMW �I 52.67" !SHOW ROOM wI z x x.x - - SHOW ROOM T -- "��� - -- x - I - -- 7.96 ro o Q of 316 . Ln 8 0' c°�, L. -J' 5.00 = x . '�` 58.33' 0 z� 3 / q e 14 x xs2.ss 16 BRENTLINGER REAL - ESTATE COMPANY / ,1$ 3.00 x w 19 7 19 K PID: 273- 011297 - 2 fi - s- 1 xxx `: ��� -- _ ZONING: PICK 18 2 SPA. 2 SPACES " -_ - x x " X x 18' SPACES ° x x 4 SPACES 234'1 I x - -- . ; " • . ` n x . x . _ - 36' 20'R HANDICAPx 1 ® xxx x ,jJ - $ I 6 will ' 3621' $ i - •-�- - � I I 4�` SPACES x g x �" i t' - ` "IOM O 17 J.1 x 28.34 : ** x �x x "E 16 R 6 5 _- a oo' 1 R -503. °2 4 , 8 t _ N - - co - 6 L= 15281 -- - _� _ - -�� �� 27.34: ** �. 401111111111111 -7o R�B7.00' _�' - - -- _ R_= 1037.00' _ I p,-1_937 .00 - - - o , all L= .96' : L= 154.15: - - - -- - 1- - - -- E= 130.2 8 $ 16 '8 16 - - - - - 1 - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60' BUILDING do PARKING T - - - - - - - POND w WE= 914.00 0 1 / U \ J CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. 21 PID; 273- 012294 ZONING: SUN & PICK z� � - -- - � x.59 262.41' -� /w -- R/w - -� /w - -�/ -- w - -� /w -- /W - -� /W �/w -- a° N 89 °16'34 W 7200' U. S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 G� 2J � w id r KEYNOTES 1. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 2. INTEGRAL CURB & SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 3. CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAI,L SHEET C3. 4. LOADING DOCK APPROACH & PAD, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 5. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 6. HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 7. WHEEL CHAIR RAMP, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 8. STANDARD CURB, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 9. TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 10. DRIVEWAY APPROACH, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2220. 11. CURB RAMP WITH DETECTABLE WARNING, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2319. 12. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2300. 13. TRASH COMPACTOR, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 14. RETAINING WALL, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 15. LOADING DOCK, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 16. VEHICLE DISPLAY /SALES AREA. 17. EMPLOYEE /CUSTOMER PARKING AREA. 18. LOADING SPACE 12'X50'. 19. ADA PARKING SIGN. 20. ADA PARKING SIGN & VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN. 21. DEALERSHIP SIGN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. NOTES • ALL ITEM NUMBERS REFER TO THE CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • TYPICAL PARKING SPACES TO BE 9' X 19' • ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, WHERE APPLICABLE, • FOR VEHICLE DISPLAY AREA SCORING PATTERN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. • SEE ARCHITECTURAL &LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. • PAVEMENT MARKINGS INCLUDING PARKING SPACES, TRANSVERSE LINES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS & ADA SYMBOLS TO BE PLACED AS SHOWN PER ITEMS 641 & 642. SITE DATA VEHICLE 1 35 32,370 PARCEL ID SALES ACREAGE PARKING REQUIRED AREA SF SPACES BUILDING (SF) Y3oo 32,370 108 OUTDOOR (SF) Y000 67,200 67 TOTAL - 175 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED STANDARD 175 284 HANDICAP 4 5 TOTAL 179 243 LOADING 3 3 VEHICLE 1 35 32,370 PARCEL ID AREA SF ACREAGE ZONING 273 - 012294 239,580 5.500 PUD /PCD 273 - 012297 200,376 4.600 PCD 273 - 010156 17,076 0.392 PCD 273 - 009976 210,918 4.842 PCD TOTAL 667,949 15.334 - BUILDING I TYPE USEI HEIGHT I AREA SF EXISTING 649,320 14.906 97.2 PROPOSED 407,716 9.360 61.0 PAVEMENT LEGEND CONCRETE (SPECKLED PATTERN) CONCRETE (SPECKLED PATTERN) 0 STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 30 15 0 30 NORTH OHIO Utiliti Pr t ti n CL Z O L a Z W m W 5 s O �L 41 C Ln c%4 00 LO Drawings a RezonlnI 08/01111 IN Informal PI 09/19111 0 0 0 es o ec o SERVICE E $ P ojed Number Crr[1 Before You Dig Q 1- 800 - 362 -2764 E A09_009 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG ° s (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) I _ d Sheet Title SITE STAKING PLAN SANDS - DECKER Sheet Number �d CPS � C4.1 ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PAVEMENT LEGEND CONCRETE (SPECKLED PATTERN) CONCRETE (SPECKLED PATTERN) STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT - - � /W /W /W - - R/W - - R /W /W /W BM �... 00i'2 I BASIN BM WE =903.5 # O #3 I $ ^ I C 5 VENTURE DRIVE o� > R N 2E 53 SPACES x 4¢7' :: c fn ezxezx zx a.......... x ezxez II I kx ...- %....,x -ma . ........ <xx < <xx <x < <x. <r. <x. <x.< 7,9' ' / �5. / . 16 / .. 367,99' R- 330.00' A =00 °33'39" L CH-3.23' ST - S89 °33'24 "E S 06 °11'35" E 24.59' KEYNOTES 1. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 2. INTEGRAL CURB & SIDEWALK, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 3. CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAI,L SHEET C3. 4. LOADING DOCK APPROACH & PAD, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 5. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 6. HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 7. WHEEL CHAIR RAMP, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 8. STANDARD CURB, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 9. TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C3. 10. DRIVEWAY APPROACH, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2220. 11. CURB RAMP WITH DETECTABLE WARNING, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2319. 12. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, PER STANDARD DRAWING 2300. 13. TRASH COMPACTOR, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 14. RETAINING WALL, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 15. LOADING DOCK, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS. 16. VEHICLE DISPLAY /SALES AREA. 17. EMPLOYEE /CUSTOMER PARKING AREA. 18. LOADING SPACE 12'X50'. 19. ADA PARKING SIGN. 20. ADA PARKING SIGN & VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN. n►inTr7c • ALL ITEM NUMBERS REFER TO THE CITY OF COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • TYPICAL PARKING SPACES TO BE 9' X 19' - •- •- •- •- •- • 25'PARKING • SETBACK •- •- •- •- •- •-- - - - - -� \ ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, WHERE APPLICABLE, • FOR VEHICLE DISPLAY AREA SCORING PATTERN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL BM PLANS. #4 SEE ARCHITECTURAL & LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. • PAVEMENT MARKINGS INCLUDING PARKING SPACES, TRANSVERSE LINES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS & ADA SYMBOLS TO BE PLACED AS SHOWN PER \ ITEMS 641 & 642. 75' BUILDING SETBACK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� - R= 111.50' \ L 155.94' L= 155.94' Ch= 143.54' \ i DIS =S46` °15'30 "E I 3 J I 3 0 w r�7 9 w 0 U Z S N� wm z' a.. G� 2J � w id r ' F Dc 0 +* I I +0 ' 16 I �\ cn * * + + * * + + + + + + ++ 5 +' o + + + +t / + + I ° + ++ 16 + * * ** ++ + ++ I 4' T + + + * + + ++ + I +�� ++ µ�i J* I + ,+ + I + + + + I + + + AA � 4 + + +\ + + ++ ' ++ I *~ \+ ++++ * * * + + * * + * ++ I \ + + + ++ 8 5 *~ 5 ++ I *++ 16 + ++ I I � PROPOSED ZONING LINE I � I R/W I S 8810 E 261.70' U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 1� 3RENTLINGER REAL STATE COMPANY D: 273 - 010156 ?ONING: PCD FUTURE DEVELOPMENT i I I I I� I Z I� I9i I I I I I - - 60' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -R/W N 89°16'34" /W 85.79' BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY PID: 273 - 009976 ZONING: PCD N °14'4 � 5 89 ' 40 N W P (9 \D Q� o� oz w� �o wo� RU 0Zrr]z o � N o E m� w 1, � U J � = o U 30 15 0 30 %J NORTH CL O Z� L a LU W m W 5 s O C 7 'L C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings a Rezoning/PDP 08/01111 O HIO Utilities Protection „ $ SERVICE Q Call Before You Dig s 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) ° s -i ° yyFrrr � W u SANDS ll DECKER Q - -- CPS ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number Sheet Title SITE STAKING PLAN Sheet Number I� { . ° ** .* x . ° ** .* 3 ....* 3 .{ * . I WET 6 DETENTION �... 00i'2 I BASIN WE =903.5 O I ^ I C 5 V Li V z 6 l; ' F Dc 0 +* I I +0 ' 16 I �\ cn * * + + * * + + + + + + ++ 5 +' o + + + +t / + + I ° + ++ 16 + * * ** ++ + ++ I 4' T + + + * + + ++ + I +�� ++ µ�i J* I + ,+ + I + + + + I + + + AA � 4 + + +\ + + ++ ' ++ I *~ \+ ++++ * * * + + * * + * ++ I \ + + + ++ 8 5 *~ 5 ++ I *++ 16 + ++ I I � PROPOSED ZONING LINE I � I R/W I S 8810 E 261.70' U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 1� 3RENTLINGER REAL STATE COMPANY D: 273 - 010156 ?ONING: PCD FUTURE DEVELOPMENT i I I I I� I Z I� I9i I I I I I - - 60' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -R/W N 89°16'34" /W 85.79' BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY PID: 273 - 009976 ZONING: PCD N °14'4 � 5 89 ' 40 N W P (9 \D Q� o� oz w� �o wo� RU 0Zrr]z o � N o E m� w 1, � U J � = o U 30 15 0 30 %J NORTH CL O Z� L a LU W m W 5 s O C 7 'L C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings a Rezoning/PDP 08/01111 O HIO Utilities Protection „ $ SERVICE Q Call Before You Dig s 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) ° s -i ° yyFrrr � W u SANDS ll DECKER Q - -- CPS ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number Sheet Title SITE STAKING PLAN Sheet Number I� 3 w " 9 w 0 U z S W2 W zcm 2J � w id r KEYNOTES 1. 6" SANITARY SERVICE, SLOPE 2% MIN. 2. OIL SEPARATOR, SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR DETAILS. 3. 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE, CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER SERVICE. 4. WATER METER PIT, PER STANDARD DRAWING L- 6317A. 5. 3" VALVE AND HEAVY DUTY VALVE BOX. 6. 8" VALVE AND HEAVY DUTY VALVE BOX. 7. 3" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE, DOMESTIC. 8. 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE, FIRE PROTECTION. 9. PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANT AND WATCH VALVE. 10. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. SEE BUILDING PLUMBING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. 11. 6" 0900 WATER LINE TO PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANT AND WATCH VALVE. 12. 6" C900 WATER LINE TO FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. 13. RELOCATED WATER METER PIT, PER STANDARD DRAWING L- 6317A. 14. STORM SEWER, SEE GRADING PLAN DETAILS, SEE SHEET X FOR PROFILES. 15. METER PIT DRAIN LINE, CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAIN LINE. Z L m 30 15 0 30 REA NORTH OHIO Utilities Protection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) SANDS DECKER C P S iNU"TNRRR C • CT TRIM' Drawings CL O a Z LU LU 0 5 s ai �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO a Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 s � — i o � a " Ell 1 Project Number Sheet Title SITE UTILITY PLAN Sheet Number C5.1 EX 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. KEYNOTES 6" SANITARY SERVICE, SLOPE 2% MIN. OIL SEPARATOR, SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR DETAILS. 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE, CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" WATER SERVICE. WATER METER PIT, PER STANDARD DRAWING L- 6317A. 3" VALVE AND HEAVY DUTY VALVE BOX. 8" VALVE AND HEAVY DUTY VALVE BOX. 3" DUCTILE IRON WATER LINE, DOMESTIC. FIRE PROTECTION. VATCH VALVE. J. SEE BUILDING PLUMBING PLANS FOR ATE FIRE HYDRANT AND WATCH VALVE. DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. PER STANDARD DRAWING L- 6317A. 'LAN DETAILS, SEE SHEET X FOR PROFILES. CT TO EXISTING DRAIN LINE. 3 w " 9 w 0 U z S N� "n Z M 2J � w id r Z L m 30 15 0 30 REA NORTH OHIO Utilities Protection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) SANDS DECKER C P S iNU"TNRRR C • CT TRIM' Drawings CL O a Z w LU 0 5 s ai �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO a Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 s � — i o � a " Ell 1 Project Number Sheet Title SITE UTILITY PLAN Sheet Number C5.2 3 w " 9 w 0 U Z S Wa W Z w - 2J � w id r ' ------------------ - - U.S. - - - -- - - - - -- UTE 33 & S. R. 161 - - -- ---------------- KEYNOTES 1. TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C4 2. FINGER DRAIN, TO BE INSTALLED WITH ALL CATCH BASINS IN PAVED AREAS, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C4. 3. CONCRETE STRUCTURE COLLAR, TO BE INSTALLED WITH ALL STRUCTURES IN PAVED AREAS, SEE DETAIL SHEET C4. 4. OUTLET CONTROL DEVICE, SEE DETAIL SHEET C4. 5. EMERGENCY SPILLWAY, MAJOR FLOOD ROUTE. 6. ROCK CHANNEL PROTECTION, 1.5'X5'X10'. 7. EXISTING CATCH BASIN BURIED, REMOVE DEBRIS, CLEAN IF NECESSARY. 8. HEADWALL /ENDWALL, PER DUBLIN STANDARD DRAWINGS ST01. Z L m PONDING DATA CONTROL STRUCTURE 25 YEAR 100 YEAR PONDING ELEVATION STORAGE PROVIDED (CF) PONDING ELEVATION STORAGE PROVIDED (CF) 3 906.96 1 104,461 907.32 118,235 PONDING DATA CALCULATED WITH HYDROCAD 30 15 0 30 %J NORTH OHIO Utilities Protection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) SANDS DECKER C P S iNU"TNRRR C • CT TRIM' Drawings CL 0 a Z LU LU 0 5 s ai �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO a Rezoninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 s � — i o � m zr� — LL Ell 1 Project Number Sheet Title SITE GRADING PLAN Sheet Number C6.1 I of of w 3 rc a O U z S w Wr. Z' <.. G� ow � w iri r ST EX.27 "STM ST ST S 2 14 911.25 Tc 2 r� 111 �oO- r LJ Ll /x 0 / Ll C " i � 9 9L2 / I I rn I I / / r� / c) �� EX.27 °STM. sT sT sT sT ST — ST ST ST ST PER PLANS) W W EX,12 "I (PER PLAN)w W W W WW 1� VENTURE DRIVE — — �OI q vv - - ' X EX.30 "STM. ST ST ST ST sT sT ST ST sT c cc c_ c Ri c BM W W W #'3 I W W W W W W W KEYNOTES 1. TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C4 2. FINGER DRAIN, TO BE INSTALLED WITH ALL CATCH BASINS IN PAVED AREAS, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C4. 3. CONCRETE STRUCTURE COLLAR, TO BE INSTALLED WITH ALL STRUCTURES IN PAVED AREAS, SEE DETAIL SHEET C4. 4. OUTLET CONTROL DEVICE, SEE DETAIL SHEET C4. / EX3 5. EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION 908.00, MAJOR FLOOD ROUTE. 6. ROCK CHANNEL PROTECTION, 1.5'X5'X10'. s1 7. EXISTING CATCH BASIN BURIED, REMOVE DEBRIS, CLEAN IF NECESSARY. st� 8. HEADWALL /ENDWALL, PER DUBLIN STANDARD DRAWINGS ST01. 9. EMERGENCY SPILLWAY, ELEVATION = 908.00. i POND OUTLET NOTE POND EMERGENCY SPILLWAY MUST NOT EXCEED ELEVATION 908.00 AT ANY POINT DURING nFW - - — w - - w E CONSTRUCTION OR FUTURE POND IMPROVEMENTS - '906 I TC- 906.88' -907 -- Elec. Ped. " �E ', 18 "STM �BURIEO� - -- - - - -- - - - - -- SA SA SA `Si - `- - - - - SA SA.. SA SA SA 8 "� =95 38' SA 'E SAAN. _ ---SA SA - -e -- TC =008.99' "SAN. S SA S —� ,i 4'PROX.LOCA TION� 8 W- 893.16 893.06 _ 10 " -8 .19' - 10"W= 891.84 ' 8 " EJ' --908 -908 - - 8 "E= 890.94 # M 4� 5 _ r 910 \ 4 9 ",909 - - - - - - 2 - -- r o 968_ _ - - - - - - -- - - 909_ t i f � / - 1 m o r V I I I I I I N 91 0 i . SrM / r r i N o�m T m rn rn rn I N I 1 I I Illllllllll W DETENTION BASIN WE =903.5 A _5 -906 \_.. -905 - -904 i N o° � 6 a'> _ _0___ -907- 966- ____ -__ _ _ mo° I 0000 9 0 rn� I � \ 00 00 TC 906.24' \ / 8 "W= 899.79 \\ �/ '12"E 1 I BOT= 899.59' .59' , ST M. 3 pPPR OX- i i I II I I ti0CP FUTURE I ' 'Illy I I 'I DEVELOPMENT I I i I I I I I I / I I l l I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I o I I I --- IJ I I 1 .1 III I i i9 i O I I I I I I I 1 I � -tj 1 i l l l i 08- I 1 i I i 1 I � I � i 1 II \ II 1 1 l 1 I I II I I II I II , I � I I I, 1 — 915 9 ;t � g1�� 91 912 �. 913 X 91 970 909 ` 916 913 914 915 914 913 913 �9 2 917 914 c' 915 916 915 914 973 1 1 915 916 917 91 4 917 916 917 915 918 916 ' 916 ,/ 917 917D ��9��18 - 916 / 916 1T - 915 - - 917 915 916 STS - _ 914 915 9'16 — - _ 915 - _ _ 914 �— 9'I 4 9 4 913 �- 913� � 4 - 915 - _ 914 2 9913 913 913 912 3 911 13 _ / _ _ �/w - - �/w - - /w— _a,n w 91 2 �� w -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- - -U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 ----------------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- I I I I 1 1 I I , I � I I I I I I I I 9 -� /w -- 30 15 0 30 %J NORTH CL O Z O a LU w m LU 5 s O 7 �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings a Rezonina/PDP 08/01111 IN Informal P&Z 09/19111 o o O HIO Utilities Protection LUR n s Project Number SERVICE � Q CR11 Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 E A09_009 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) ° s d Sheet Title 1 SITE GRADING PLAN SANDS - DECKER Shoot Number � m 1 CPS / C6.2 ENGINEERS iii SURVEYORS 92 91 91 90 90 89 W n 92 91 91 90 90 89 'D+UU 4 +UU PROFILE:3 RUN: 27 -05 PROFILE:2 RUN: 12-04 M n S +UU L +UU nnn nn 1 LV z7L 15 91 10 91 05 90 00 90 95 89 4 20 91 3 2 15 91 10 90 05 90 00 89 95 89 PROFILE:1 RUN: 3-X n O L0 r O O ci Lfl -- ci r CD O Ln 00 Ln Lq O O O N O O m (n 00 m Ln m r �j O ) O U 00 U O) O H m O Cn H 00 O I- (0 O) m 15.00'-18" (n CT) II ®2.87% CT) O m II O m 78.54'-18"@0.5 % II II r7 F- r7 II H U II F- F N II U H N II U H F- I- - / (0 O O (n Q M Z 1 O O o N Q r - - - - - - r- Q - - - -- Q p Z p Z r r CO 00 00 Lo N O Nj N n r ®0.65% W J r7 Q r7 0 Q O nj U N N J m - _ > o M Cn rn rn II rn Q 0) rn o IIU --- _ r z LLJ- U - n z U W Z oO U Do o0 W U 00 00 W W 00 00 151.9 S Q -- 93.63" , N N > � O 00 00 Lq O N r7 O ®1, 00 00 - D7 + + ®0.50% + W Ln ----- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - W 142.0 .68% 34.00' -18" 139 .13' -24" ®0.61% W W - m 11 ®0.26% � U 167.51'24" ®0.26% I- W O N O Ld Lo N I W Z r7 I J 1 r7 rn = 0 Q N 210.68' -24" ®0.18% N 82.81'24" ®0.24% 116.58'30 "@0.64% ~O ~ ° O o 150.00' -30 "00.44% I W M z7 Ln Z O O n O O r7 (n L(j I W Z N J N I M O 0 N 1 Q O 4 O p 00 O m 11 v) I = Q v) 1 Q m S ~ U = 3 z U U II m 3: II 3 Lil Q � Q O I LLJ Q Z W O Z _ _ Z L17 Q Z 00 00 U N N I Q Q L0 Lc) N 00 Z r, 10 (0 C) O O� N in N r o Z J N N. N O Z N N M <6 N- 0 0 N Z r r r N Q M m O r N Q m W 0) 0 0 Z Cn Cn O J U CO L6 6 O O O H O 0) Ln��m rn H O rn m H O 7 H O rn rn m II rn rn rn m h 00 On = D O = II II z w nn + i O S z II II II U) = n w n II II II z w D m 0 0 D Cr) Cn V) Q O O Cn U N U O 0) 0) O O 00 N N U N N O 1 Z r) r7 N 11 II = Z Ln n Ln T) N N Z Ln p Ln Ln Z O O r) p r) N Q Q Ln Q M n O O N w N N Q N N N C 6 N C) DJ of N N Q Ln Ln U J O U Q n Lr) r U- CD Q Ln LC) O O :2 Q Ln O p U N T Q O 4 O p M DO Cr) r7 O M O O P cD N m O p 0) 0) m O M Cn m p m 0i � Q m + °�rnm r O mrn II II 00 °� II II W W N = II 0) II II :5.: 11 i�: W N 3: O O N 3wz � 3 W V) O �Ln Z z W V) a 3 Q - N � Q�� N N Q'4 O N Q O O N W O U N N U CN N U N r7 U ro r) N S r7 00 O 00 O O Z) ) O O O Cn (O O O + + + + + 92 91 91 90 90 89 'D+UU 4 +UU PROFILE:3 RUN: 27 -05 PROFILE:2 RUN: 12-04 M n S +UU L +UU nnn nn 1 LV z7L 15 91 10 91 05 90 00 90 95 89 4 20 91 3 2 15 91 10 90 05 90 00 89 95 89 PROFILE:1 RUN: 3-X n I +UU U +UU I +UU PROFILE: 2.1 RUN: 12-04 n n n U +UU 15 10 05 00 95 90 N L0 r O r 5 Lfl 00 r CD O 00 CID Lq O O N O m (n m Ln m �j O ) U 00 U O) H m H Cn H O I- m 15.00'-18" (n II ®2.87% II II 60.28'18 "00.50% 78.54'-18"@0.5 % II r7 F- r7 U F N N F- I- - / (0 O O (n Q M Z 1 O O o N Q r - - - - - - r- Q - - - -- Q p Z p Z r r CO 00 00 Lo N O Nj N n r ®0.65% W J r7 Q r7 0 Q O nj U N N J m - _ > o M Cn rn rn II rn Q 0) rn o IIU --- _ r z LLJ- U - n z U W Z oO U Do o0 W U 00 00 W W 00 00 151.9 S Q -- 93.63" , N N > � O 00 00 Lq O N r7 O ®1, 00 00 D7 + + ®0.50% + W Ln Q I +UU U +UU I +UU PROFILE: 2.1 RUN: 12-04 n n n U +UU 15 10 05 00 95 90 C+ 00 U +UU 9 +uu 8+ 00 / +Uu PROFILE: 3.1 RUN: 27 -05 92 6 4 91 91 90 90 89 20 15 10 05 00 95 CL O _ cC Z� - O a oC W M V W W 0 s O C 7 �L L ` C Ln cV 00 LO L0 5 r N r Lq o N N 00 Ln O Ln m 00 O) m Cn O I- m (n II II II II II F- U F F- / o ®0.50% - - - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- LLJ 130 :17'12" ®0.65% W -- - _ > o m - W W 151.9 '-18"@0.44% Q -- 93.63" , 18"@0.44% > N O ®1, D7 94.33' 12" ®0.50% W Ln Q 142.0 .68% 34.00' -18" 139 .13' -24" ®0.61% W W 11 ®0.26% Q U 167.51'24" ®0.26% I- O N O N I W Z r7 J 1 r7 rn = Q N N Q H ~O ~ ° O o I W M z7 Ln Z O O n O O r7 (n L(j I W Z N J N I M O 0 N 1 Q O 4 O p 00 O m 11 v) I = Q v) 1 Q m S ~ U = 3 z U U II m 3: II 3 Lil Q � Q O Q Z W O Z _ _ Z L17 Q Z 00 00 U N N I Q Q L0 Lc) N 00 Z r, 10 (0 C) O O� N in N r o N N N. Z O Z N N M <6 N- 0 0 Z r r r Q M m O r Q Q m W 0) 0 0 Z Cn Cn O J (0 CO 00 O Q O O O M m CO L6 6 O O O V) 0) Ln��m rn rn m 7 O rn rn m II rn rn rn m h On = II V) O = II II z w nn + i S z II II II U) = n w n II II II z w m 0 0 Cr) Cn O Cn U N U N N. 0) 0) O 00 N N U N N 11 II = II II Ln N �w� Q M O) Q w N N Q M (0 z� Q DJ of N Q Ln Ln U U U- CD :2 r U N T DO Cr) O cD N + + � + + r O 00 N C+ 00 U +UU 9 +uu 8+ 00 / +Uu PROFILE: 3.1 RUN: 27 -05 92 6 4 91 91 90 90 89 20 15 10 05 00 95 CL O _ cC Z� - O a oC W M V W W 0 s O C 7 �L L ` C Ln cV 00 LO L0 5 CD Ln O o o 00 Ln O Ln 00 Ln O O m (n II II II II II F- U F F- o ®0.50% - - - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- LLJ 130 :17'12" ®0.65% W > o m W 151.9 '-18"@0.44% Q -- 93.63" , 18"@0.44% W N 20 7.96' , 24" ®1, W Ln W 139 .13' -24" ®0.61% Q I- I Ln N N I W Z r7 J 1 r7 rn = N N Q H ~O ~ ° O o O M z7 Ln Z O O n O O (n L(j I W Z M O 0 Q O 4 O p J m 11 v) I v) 1 m ~ U = 3 z Q U II m 3: II 3 Lil Q Q O D Z W O Z _ _ U < Q ¢ U N N ¢ C) O O� N in o Q Z O Z N N U r7 r) N Z r r r r Q O p 0 Z Cn Cn O �^ V) 0) Ln��m O 7 �r700 m h On O z I nn nn + i C+ 00 U +UU 9 +uu 8+ 00 / +Uu PROFILE: 3.1 RUN: 27 -05 92 6 4 91 91 90 90 89 20 15 10 05 00 95 CL O _ cC Z� - O a oC W M V W W 0 s O C 7 �L L ` C Ln cV 00 LO b +UU / +UU b +UU S +UU 4 +UU 20 30 15 0 30 15 Drawings 1 0 a Rezonina/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 o o O HIO 05 Utilities rotection E Project Number SERVICE Q Gr[1 Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 E x09_009 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 0 0 (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) P ° s d Sheet Title STORM PROFILES i m S 100 95 LL, KER Sheet Number PRO ENGINEERS iii SURVEYORS C7.1 L0 CD o o Ln Ln Ln m II II II II II F- F F- 76.11'12" ®0.50% LLJ 130 :17'12" ®0.65% > o 151.9 '-18"@0.44% Q -- 93.63" , 18"@0.44% W W I Ln N rn H M M M I W Z N J n v) I v) 1 ~ U = Q Q Q O D U < Q ¢ ¢ in o Q Z O Z N N Z r r r Q O p 0 Z Cn Cn g �^ V) Ln��m 7 �r700 m On m m m 0 0 W 0) C Q O O m 0 0 Cr) Cn O Cn J U Cn C11 Cn 0) 0) �w 11 II = II II �w� Q N Q w N N Q 1,J Y) N Do N z� Q DJ of N Q - 00 U U U- :2 - - U N T DO � r O 00 N N O O N O � b +UU / +UU b +UU S +UU 4 +UU 20 30 15 0 30 15 Drawings 1 0 a Rezonina/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 o o O HIO 05 Utilities rotection E Project Number SERVICE Q Gr[1 Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 E x09_009 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 0 0 (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) P ° s d Sheet Title STORM PROFILES i m S 100 95 LL, KER Sheet Number PRO ENGINEERS iii SURVEYORS C7.1 3 w w w 9 w 0 U z S wg w zoo 2J � w id r STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWP3) THE SWP3 PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT IS COMPOSED OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT, INCLUDING ALL REQUIREMENTS THEREIN, THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, AND ALL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION INCLUDED /ADDED BY THE CONTRACTOR(S). THIS PLAN SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ALL INCLUSIVE AS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SOIL SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES NOT ALREADY SPECIFIED ON THESE PLAN MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO UNFORESEEN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND /OR CHANGES IN DRAINAGE PATTERNS CAUSED BY EARTH - DISTURBING ACTIVITY. SITE DESCRIPTION A. DRIVE & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING SCHOOLS B. TOTAL AREA OF SITE - XXX ACRES TOTAL AREA DISTURBED - XXX ACRES C. PRE - CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - XXXX D. POST- CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF COEFFICIENT - XXXX E. IMPERVIOUS AREA CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - XXXX AC. PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUSNESS - XXX% F. EmC2- ELDEAN SILT LOAM, SgB- SHINROCK SILT, MhC2- MIAMIAN SILT G. PRE - DEVELOPED FARM FIELD. H. UTILITY AND GRADING ACTIVITY TO COMMENCE JUNE 2011 WITH TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION METHODS. I. RECEIVING STREAM - XXXX CONTRACTOR /CONSTRUCTION MANAGER RESPONSIBILITY A. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL ORDINANCES THAT APPLY. B. THE SWP3 PLAN, INCLUDING COPIES OF THE NOI, THE LETTER GRANTING PERMIT COVERAGE AND THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. THE SWP3 MUST BE SIGNED BY THE PERMITTEE OR A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, AS DEFINED IN THE GENERAL PERMIT (PART V.G). CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHERED AND EVALUATED THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETELI AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING TO REVIEW THE PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING BEFORE EARTHWORK IS PERMITTED. 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) FOR CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. IF THE MAJORITY OF MUD OR DIRT IS NOT REMOVED FROM EXITING TRAFFIC, TEMPORARY WATER STORAGE TANKS WITH HOSES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC EXIT POINTS AND VEHICLE TIRES SHALL BE WASHED BEFORE EXITING ON PUBLIC ROADS. SILT FROM THIS WASHING OPERATION SHALL BE INTERCEPTED AND TRAPPED BEFORE WASHWATER IS ALLOWED TO BE DISCHARGED OFFSITE. 3. DUST ON SITE SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY SPRAYING WATER ON DRY AREAS OF THE SITE. THE USE OF OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION IS PROHIBITED. 4. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. INITIAL CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO GAIN ACCESS, AND INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE, AS SHOWN ON PLANS, WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF CLEARING AND GRUBBING. INSTALL PERIMETER FILTER FABRIC FENCE AND BEGIN CLEARING & GRUBBING. EXERCISE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE VALUABLE TREES OR DISTURB DESIGNATED BUFFER ZONES. 5. PERFORM CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND TOPSOIL STOCKPILING AS REQUIRED. CONSTRUCT ALL SEDIMENT BASINS, TRAPS, AND DIVERSIONS WITHIN 7 DAYS OF FIRST GRUBBING. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER TREE CLEARING IS COMPLETE. CONTINUE LAND CLEARING AND GRADING WITH KEY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE IN PLACE. ONCE A SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT AREA IS CLEARED, GRADING SHOULD FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY SO THAT PROTECTIVE GROUND COVER CAN BE REESTABLISHED QUICKLY. DO NOT LEAVE ANY AREA BARE AND EXPOSED FOR EXTENDED PERIODS. LEAVE ADJOINING AREAS PLANNED FOR DEVELOPMENT, OR TO BE USED FOR BORROW OR DISPOSAL, UNDISTURBED FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE TO SERVE AS NATURAL BUFFER ZONES. 6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER LAND CLEARING, APPLY SURFACE STABILIZATION ON GRADED AND OTHER DISTURBED AREAS. STABILIZE ANY DISTURBED AREA WHERE ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT TAKE PLACE FOR 30 WORKING DAYS BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND /OR MULCHING OR BY OTHER SUITABLE MEANS. INSTALL PERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINAL GRADING. TEMPORARY SEEDING AND /OR MULCHING MAY BE NECESSARY IF WEATHER CONDITIONS DETERIORATE, WITH PERMANENT MEASURES DELAYED TEMPORARILY. T DURING EMBANKMENT OPERATIONS, TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES /BERMS AND TEMPORARY SLOPE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE TO MINIMIZE EROSION OF THE FILL FACE. S. BEGIN SITE GRADING OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION FOR STORM DRAINS AS SOON AS THE DRAIN IS FUNCTIONAL TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE IN SHALLOW POOLS AND TO ALLOW FLOOD FLOWS TO SAFELY ENTER THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 9. INSTALL ALL STORM SEWER PIPES AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WITH APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO ELIMINATE SILTATION FROM ENTERING PIPE SYSTEMS. 10. WHEN APPLICABLE, INSTALL BASE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED FOR PAVEMENT. 11. REMOVE INLET PROTECTION AROUND INLETS AND MANHOLES NO MORE THAN 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING STABILIZED BASE COURSE. IF APPLICABLE, NOTE THAT EROSION CONTROL AROUND INLETS CANNOT BE REMOVED UNTIL PAVING OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETE. 12. INSTALL FINAL PAVEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 11 CARRY OUT FINAL GRADING, SEEDING, AND PLANTING AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. LANDSCAPING AND FINAL STABILIZATION IS THE LAST MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD HAVE PERMANENT MEASURES APPLIED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF FINISHING FINAL GRADE. ALL TEMPORARY STRUCTURES SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER PERMANENT STRUCTURES ARE IN PLACE AND STABILIZED. BORROW /DISPOSAL AREAS SHOULD BE PERMANENTLY VEGETATED OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY PRACTICES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION. 14. INSPECT STORM SEWERS PRIOR TO TURNOVER. REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY. 15. REGULAR MAINTENANCE INSPECTION AND REPAIR OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. MAINTENANCE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL FEATURES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS IN A. PARTICULAR AREA. IT MAY BECOME NECESSARY TO REMOVE PORTIONS OF A BARRIER DURING CONSTRUCTION TO FACILITATE GRADING OPERATIONS IN CERTAIN AREAS. HOWEVER, THE BARRIER SHALL BE IN PLACE IN THE EVENING OR DURING ANY INCLEMENT WEATHER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES USED ON THIS PROJECT. THE SITE SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL. RECORDS OF THESE INSPECTIONS SHALL BE KEPT AND MADE AVAILABLE TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES, IF REQUESTED. ANY SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS WHICH HAS REDUCED THE EFFICIENCY OF A STRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SHOULD A STRUCTURE OR FEATURE BECOME DAMAGED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE STRUCTURE OR FEATURE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 15. PRE - WINTER STABILIZATION MEETING IF PROJECT IS TO BE THROUGH THE WINTER. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. ALL PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE AREAS OF SOIL- DISTURBING ACTIVITY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL WATERWAYS, WETLANDS, STORM SEWERS AND PUBLIC LANDS, SHALL BE PROTECTED, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, FROM SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE. 2. CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES USED TO SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL CONFORM, AS A MINIMUM, TO STATE OF OHIO STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE RAINWATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL, DEFINED BY THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE MOST CURRENT OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OHIO REVISED CODE CHAPTER 6111 REQUIREMENTS. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN .APPROVALS ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE RULES DO NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR OBTAINING ALL OTHER NECESSARY PERMITS AND /OR APPROVALS FROM FEDERAL STATE, AND /OR COUNTY AGENCIES. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED BY STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS. IF REQUIREMENTS VARY, THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED. 4. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AT THE SITE AND AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLAN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: A. RESERVED B. LIMITS TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED ON SITE WITH SIGNAGE, FLAGGING, FENCING ETC. C. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT PERIMETER CONTROLS AS A FIRST ACTION OF CONSTRUCTION AS SPECIFIED BY CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE, THIS SHALL INCLUDE AND IS NOT LIMITED TO PROTECTIVE BMP'S FOR STREAM CORRIDORS AND CROSSINGS, WETLANDS, SITE ENTRANCE, SEDIMENT TRAPS AND BASINS, BARRIERS, AND DIVERSION DIKES. D. CONCENTRATED STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE BEFORE EXITING THE SITE BOUNDARIES. CONCENTRATED RUNOFF FROM BARE SOIL AREAS SHALL BE DIVERTED INTO A SETTLING POND OR SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURE, OR OTHER APPROVED SEDIMENT BARRIER BEFORE LEAVING THE SITE. E. EARTHEN STRUCTURES SUCH AS DAMS, BASINS, STREAM MODIFICATIONS AND WATER DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF THE COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION. DAMS SHALL CONFORM TO THE OHIO DAM LAWS (ORC 1521.06). F' CRITICAL AREAS WITHIN 50 FEET OF ANY STREAM OR WETLAND SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STABILIZED WITHIN TWO (2) DAYS OF DISTURBANCE IF AREA WILL REMAIN INACTIVE FOR SEVEN (7) DAYS OR LONGER. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL AVOID STREAMS AND THE 50 FOOT BUFFER AREAS. IF AN ACTIVE DRAINAGE WAY MUST BE CROSSED BY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES REPEATEDLY DURING CONSTRUCTION, A TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE .SPECIFICATIONS IN THE RAINWATER & LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL. CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, CULVERTS OR SEDIMENT CONTROL STRUCTURES SHALL NOT PLACE SOIL, DEBRIS AND OTHER FINE PARTICULATE MATERIAL INTO OR CLOSE TO THE WATER RESOURCE IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT MAY SLOUGH, SLIP OR ERODE. G. STORM SEWER INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF WILL NOT ENTER THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED AND /OR TREATED. H. TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER ROUGH GRADING IF THE AREA WILL REMAIN IDLE LONGER THAN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS. PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADE IS REACHED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE. PERMANENT VEGETATION IS A GROUND COVER DENSE ENOUGH TO COVER 807 OF THE SOIL SURFACE AND MATURE ENOUGH TO SURVIVE WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS. I. SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED OR PROTECTED TO PREVENT SOIL LOSS. STABILIZATION SHALL BE REQUIRED IF STOCKPILES ARE LOCATED WITHIN CRITICAL AREAS NEAR STREAMS OR WETLANDS, OR IF SEDIMENT FROM STOCKPILES WILL OTHERWISE LEAVE THE SITE. J. UNSTABLE SOILS PRONE TO SLIPPING OR SLOUGHING SHALL NOT BE CLEARED, GRADED, EXCAVATED, FILLED OR HAVE LOADS IMPOSED UPON THEM UNLESS THE WORK IS PLANNED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PLAN. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE EROSION PROBLEMS. ADEQUATE SLOPE DESIGN INCLUDES USE OF ROUGH SOIL SURFACE ALONG THE FACE OF THE SLOPE, WATER DIVERSION ALONG THE TOP OF THE SLOPE AWAY FROM THE FACE, TERRACES TO REDUCE SLOPE LENGTH, DELIVERY OF CONCENTRATED STORM WATER FLOWS TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE VIA ADEQUATE CHANNEL OR PIPE, AND DRAINAGE FOR WATER SEEPS IN THE SLOPE THAT ENDANGER SLOPE STABILITY. K. SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PAVED SURFACES AND /OR PUBLIC ROADS AT THE END OF EACH DAY IN SUCH A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CREATE OFF -SITE SEDIMENTATION, IN ORDER TO ENSURE SAFETY AND ABATE OFF -SITE SOIL LOSS. COLLECTED SEDIMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN A STABLE LOCATION ON SITE OR TAKEN OFF -SITE TO A STABLE LOCATION. L. DISTURBED OR MODIFIED DRAINAGE WAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED. EROSION EFFECTS OF STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL BE REDUCED BY USING AND /OR MAINTAINING GRASSED SWALES, INFILTRATION STRUCTURES OR WATER DIVERSIONS. M. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE INSPECTED ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A 0.5" OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT. A WRITTEN LOG OF THESE INSPECTIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO CONTROLS SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE, THE INSPECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE THE DATE OF INSPECTION, NAME OF INSPECTOR, WEATHER CONDITIONS, ACTIONS TAKEN TO CORRECT ANY PROBLEMS AND THE DATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE TAKEN. N. TRENCHES FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES AND PIPES SHALL BE TEMPORALLY STABILIZED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS IF THEY ARE TO REMAIN INACTIVE FOR THIRTY (30) DAYS. TRENCH DEWATERING DEVICES SHALL DISCHARGE IN A MANNER THAT FILTERS SOIL -LADEN WATER BEFORE DISCHARGING IT TO A RECEIVING DRAINAGE DITCH OR POND. IF SEEDING, MULCHING OR OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WERE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED, THESE PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE REINSTALLED. 0. DISTURBED AREAS WHICH WILL REMAIN UNWORRIED FOR A PERIOD OF TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS OR MORE SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEEDING AND MULCHING OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEANS WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS. P. EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WITH MATTING WILL BE USED ON DITCHES GREATER THAN 1.5% AND ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN 5% GRADE. Q. NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE SHALL BE DISCHARGED INTO STORM WATER RUNOFF. R. OFF -SITE VEHICLE TRACKING SEDIMENT SHALL BE MINIMIZED. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES ARE LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD(S) NOTED ON THE PLAN. S. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MEET THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE OHIO RAINWATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL (CURRENT EDITION).. T. OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ITEMS MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. U. WINTERIZATION - ANY DISTURBED AREA THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE WORKED FOR TWENTY -ONE (21). DAYS OR MORE MUST BE SEEDED AND MULCHED BY NOVEMBER 1 OR MUST HAVE A DORMANT SEEDING OR MULCH COVER APPLIED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1 AND MARCH 1. V. CONCRETE CEMENT IS TO BE TAKEN BACK TO PLANT FOR WASHOUT AND RECYCLING. 2 "X2" STAKE, J (SH 42" LONG J � ARPENED) r i SEDIMENT FENCE NOT TO SCALE WHERE PODDING AVAILABILITY & DITCH HEIGHT IS LIMITED, A NOTCH OVER FLOW LINE MAY BE CUT INTO FABRIC BETWEEN 2 CLOSELY SPACED STAKES TO PREVENT END AROUND SCOURING SILT FENCE THIS SEDIMENT BARRIER UTILIZES STANDARD STRENGTH OR EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC. IT IS DESIGNED FOR SITUATIONS IN WHICH ONLY SHEET OR OVERLAND FLOWS ARE EXPECTED. THE HEIGHT OF A SILT FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. HIGHER FENCES MAY IMPOUND VOLUMES OF WATER SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE OF THE STRUCTURE. THE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCHASED IN A CONTINUOUS ROLL CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID THE USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST WITH A MINIMUM 6 NCH OVERLAP, AND SECURELY SEALED. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 10 FEET APART AT THE BARRIER LOCATION AND DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FABRIC IS USED WITHOUT THE WIRE SUPPORT FENCE, POST SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 FEET. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 4INCHES DEEP ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS AND UP SLOPE FROM THE BARRIER. WHEN STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC IS USED, A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE POSTS USING HEAVY DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST 1 NCH LONG, TIE WIRES OR HOG RINGS. THE WIRE SHALL EXTEND NTO THE TRENCH A MINIMUM OF 2INCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE STAPLED OR WIRED TO THE FENCE, AND 8 INCHES OF THE FABRIC SHALL BE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABRIC SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO EXISTING TREES. WHEN EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ARE USED, THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE ELIMINATED. IN SUCH A CASE, THE FILTER FABRIC IS STAPLED OR WIRED DIRECTLY TO THE POSTS WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF ITEM NO. 6 APPLYING. THE TRENCH SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND SOIL COMPACTED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPSLOPE AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, MAINTENANCE SILT FENCES AND FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED MMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL, ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE MMEDIATELY. SHOULD THE FABRIC ON A SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER IS STILL NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. WOVEN MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTI LE 2 "X2" PINE STAKE, PLACE AT LEFT & RIGHT EDGES OF FLOW LINE 1 _ 0 0 LINE DOWNSTREAM EDGE OF DITCH CHECK WITH 18" WIDE STRAW /COCONUT BLANKET, PLACE BLANKET ALONG ENTIRE WIDTH OF DITCH & EXTEND 2' (MIN.) UP THE BANK ON EACH SIDE TO LIMIT DOWNSTREAM SCOUR. WOVEN MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE TOP OF FABRIC TO BE PLACED AT 1.25 -1.5t TIMES NORMAL FLOW DEPTH (MAX. HEIGHT 30 ") 2 "X2" PINE STAKE, SECURELY DRIVEN INTO GROUND, 18" MIN, IF POSSIBLE %s WIRE STAPLES HIGH SPUN TYPAR (IF DESIRED) 1Yz OF SHOVELED FINE DIRT OR GRAVEL ( #57 STONE PREFERRED) FLOW_ STRAW /COCONUT FIBER BLANKET TO PREVENT DOWNSTREAM SCOURING II L I L 6" SOD STAPLES, 1' -2' APART `J ACROSS DITCH WIDTH LEADING EDGE MUST LAY FLAT ON THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH & ALONG BANK SIDES, REMOVE ALL VISIBLE ROCK UNDER THE LEADING EDGE FILTER FABRIC DITCH CHECK Q Q SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE -HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. MATERIALS GUIDE • 2 "X2" PINE STAKES, SHARPENED • WOVEN MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (100 -250 GPM /SQ. FT. FLOW RATE) OR HIGH FLOW FABRIC (HIGH SPUN TYPAR FOR ADDITIONAL PODDING) • %s WIRE STAPLES AND 6" SOD STAPLES • STRAW /COCONUT FIBER BLANKET • ODOT #57 STONE INSTALLATION GUIDE 1. DETERMINE REQUIRED HEIGHT OF FABRIC - IN GENERAL, REQUIRED HEIGHT EQUALS 1.25 TO 1.5 TIMES NORMAL FLOW DEPTH OF DITCH. 2. NSTALL STAKES PER DIAGRAMS. 1 USE 4' CARPENTER'S LEVEL TO MARK STAKES AT TOP OF FABRIC LOCATION. TOP OF FABRIC TO BE LEVEL ALONG THE WIDTH OF DITCH. 4. STAPLE TOP EDGE OF FABRIC TO STAKES AT LEVEL MARKS. 5. TRIM EXCESS FABRIC TO PROVIDE A LEADING EDGE THAT LIES FLAT AND FLUSH WITH DITCH BOTTOM. 6. HIGH SPUN TYPAR FABRIC MAY BE ADDED AT UPSTREAM END IF ADDITIONAL PODDING IS DESIRED OR IF SUPERFINES ARE OF CONCERN. 7. STAPLE BOTTOM OF FABRIC AT DITCH BOTTOM; CHECK TO ENSURE A TIGHT FIT. 8. SHOVEL DIRT OR GRAVEL TO COMPLETELY COVER LEADING EDGE 9. PLACE STRAW /COCONUT FIBER AT DOWNSTREAM END; SECURE WITH SOD STAPLES; TRIM EXCESS MATERIAL SO THAT IT LIES FLAT AND FLUSH WITH DITCH BOTTOM. 10. FABRIC ROLL DIMENSIONS TO BE BASED ON INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ALL EXCESS TO BE TRIMMED WITH SHARP UTILITY KNIFE OR SCISSORS.. 11. ANY INSTALLATION FOLDS MUST BE CAREFULLY TRIMMED AND OVERLAPPED TO AVOID WRINKLES OR UNDESIRABLE IRREGULARITIES. MAINTENANCE GUIDE 1. AFTER FIRST RAIN, REPLACE ANY MISSING ROCK AND DIRT AT LEADING EDGE. 2 INSPECT FABRIC DITCH CHECK AFTER HEAVY RAINS. G. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS FROM FABRIC DITCH CHECK WHEN THE TOP OF SEDIMENT REACHES 75% OF FABRIC HEIGHT. FABRIC ROLL WIDTH EQUALS DESIRED HEIGHT OF FABRIC TO BE INSTALLED IN DITCH PLUS LENGTH OF LEADING EDGE NOTE: WHERE DESIRED HEIGHT EXCEEDS FABRIC ROLL WIDTH, FABRIC TO BE OVERLAPPED BY A MINIMUM OF 12 ". PLACE 2 "X6" OR 4 "X4" BOARD BEHIND OVERLAP. IRATE OPUP" PAVED AREA LAWN AREA PROTECTION PROTECTION BAG /POPUP TO BE PRE - MANUFACTURED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. BAG /POPUP MUST BE MANUFACTURED OF A WOVEN MONOFILAMENT FABRIC (30 SIEVE SIZE MEETING FEDERAL GUIDELINES) AND INCLUDE HEAVY DUTY LIFTING STRAPS. INSTALLATION: OPEN BAG /POPUP NEAR THE INLET. IF USING OPTIONAL OIL ABSORBENTS, PLACE ABSORBENT PILLOW ON BOTTOM (BELOW -GRADE SIDE) OF BAG /POPUP. REMOVE GRATE FROM FRAME & PLACE INTO BAG /POPUP.. HOLDING LIFTING STRAPS, INSERT GRATE INTO INLET MAKING SURE THAT GRATE SEATS COMPLETELY IN FRAME. MAINTENANCE: REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT & DEBRIS FROM BAG /POPUP, SURFACE & VICINITY OF BAG /POPUP AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. REMOVE SEDIMENT THAT HAS ACCUMULATED WITHIN CONTAINMENT AREA OF UNIT AS NEEDED. IF USING OPTIONAL OIL ABSORBENTS, REMOVE & REPLACE ABSORBENT PILLOW WHEN NEAR SATURATION. INLET PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE EX. GROUND WASH RACK (OPTIONAL) z ° * MUST EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS /EGRESS OPERATION. EX. GROUND FILTER FABRIC. ° PLAN SECTION SEX. PAVEMENT MOUNTABLE BERM (OPTIONAL) CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1, STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLE CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. 2 LENGTH - AS REQUIRED. 3. THICKNESS. - NOT LESS THAN 6 ". 4. WIDTH - 10' MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE, 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL, A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. T MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND /OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. & WASHING - WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAYS. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH STONE, 9. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRY NOT TO SCALE COARSE AGGREGATE ° 10' MIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE 3' � 5: 1 SLOPE �n n 8 � 4g - i o 1 o 1 O r- Z� O a LL w M � W U 5 s O C 7 �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings 0 R¢oninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number `1 11 Sheet Title SITE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Sheet Number C8.1 PAVEMENT CONCRETE WASHOUT SOIL SEDIMENT AREA BERM FENCE 8' TREATED - HOLLOW OUT AREA -� 4 "x4" POST - (6" MIN.) FILL 4 " -6 ". WITH AGGREGATE '. ( #57 #4 OR #2) SIGN _ SIGN: 24 "x36 "x3 PLYWOOD - - - PAINTED WHITE WITH PAINTED 8' MIN. - M 4" MIN. BLACK STENCILED LETTERING. CONCRETE WASH -OUT AREA J NOT TO SCALE COARSE AGGREGATE ° 10' MIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE 3' � 5: 1 SLOPE �n n 8 � 4g - i o 1 o 1 O r- Z� O a LL w M � W U 5 s O C 7 �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings 0 R¢oninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number `1 11 Sheet Title SITE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Sheet Number C8.1 3' � 5: 1 SLOPE �n n 8 � 4g - i o 1 o 1 O r- Z� O a LL w M � W U 5 s O C 7 �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO Drawings 0 R¢oninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number `1 11 Sheet Title SITE EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Sheet Number C8.1 - 1 ST ST ST /w - - \\ - -912 -- 1 - -- 913 2 12 2 �i 913 913913 i 19 E i i�973 \ I g \ " 11 2 2 i 2 - 912- Sj ST - Sr Sr Sr ST GSr Sr Sr Sr Sr Sr � _ Sr Sr Sr Sr� /W �/w - �/w /w /w - �/w VENTURE DRIVE f 07 _ _ 3. 913 ��2. 3 7 - - -- 1 - -- -- — 97.3 913 " 4. 5 -soa- - - ens. -.. 2 17 14 - 2 2 yu y0 s 7< , , o m 13 y J 3 912 m 2 ` 91 j m ,ya '----- ses - -- 2 909 9 O © SERVICE 2 DETAILING DEPT FUTURE FUTURE ��� WET =, DEVELOPMENT 9,� _ � DETENTION Q LOADING , BMW / MINI RVICE 21 20 o � � _ BASIN Doac MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 5 WE =903.5 ` - - - -- C 916 913 973 �...`1" � I I I I I 916 ....1.'.'....... / o ---- - - - - -� SERVICE 97 4 S ^ 4 �^ DEPT. MINI s, g g1 1 'sJZ. 8 o 916 e BMW SHOW ROOM SHOW ROOM 97a 4 �z3 g� N _ c2 �ornn o i 916 �j i h l i is" 97 917 i 2 8 - -- - - - -- 24 E. . I 2 9 @ 5 7 s3:' 9. 2 � 3 ..o._c.. o +, e' 'I 916 s • • gT� ' 915 -- --- __ � �� _ _ ___ o 9io— 1 913 974 -- � 914 ' --- � - - - - - - - - eery' '( 1 POND 2 29 912 a 914 914 15 '� 9 9� 3 � g�9 6, o ate s t s ot� 9 t 9 -909" n �: 915 g15 915 ��� oto g�j4 914 913 !12 .09 ` 91 . E =9400 / A g( g gig7_g7 9 ) 6 6' atz 914 973 917 914 975 — �—�aic 915 914 —� at3 i� \ yio , ca 917 tF � 918 x9 - - - -- 916 t 7 ( K`. g18 °16� 9 "17 977 917 s a i 916 yieI 917 91 _ 916 _ _ 915 917 _ 915 —��yiu all 9t 914 914, - 915 1491 916 - s 1 ny� -_ -- -- - _ 5 ,,- '�z. 4 - 914 914 913 9 3 ,L /yy _ - 915 914 9 91 ` 912 y„ -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- , 3 0 w C9 9 w 0 U N W Zm a� G� 2J � w id r 10'± DROP -IN GRATE 18" MIN PERFORATE PIPE HEADWALL #57 N WRAP PIPE IN FILTER STONE FABRIC (ITEM 712.09, TYPE C) o- o o o _ - • o o ADS N -12 90' BEND ° .oC?oC? o OR APPROVED EQUAL 0 0 °�- - - BOTTOM OF BASIN o 36 "X36 "X6" CONCRETE PAD STRAP & BOLT PIPE TO CONCRETE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE HEADWALL (SEE PLAN VIEW). CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE AND MAINTAIN THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN WITH A MINIMUM SETTLING CAPACITY OF 67 CY /ACRE OF DISTURBED AREA. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM TEMPORARY BASIN BEFORE 40% CAPACITY IS REACHED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL TEMPORARY BASIN BE PUMPED OR DRAINED INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE WAYS OR EXISTING STORM SYSTEM WITHOUT PROPER FILTERING TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM POLLUTING EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. ONCE THE SITE IS 80% PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AND ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE NOT TO SCALE JUTTE MATTING OR >� :SIMILAR CEO-TEXTILE HEADWALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE F --- TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN NOT TO SCALE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. CONSTRUCT PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURES 1 -3. 2. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN, INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. 3. INSTALL TEMPORARY STUB FROM STRUCTURE 3 TO SEDIMENT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN 4. ROUGH GRADE PARKING, BUILDING PAD AND SITE.. 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY DITCHES TO ROUTE SEDIMENT LADEN STORM RUNOFF TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN. 6. CONSTRUCT PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURES 4 -28 AND RELATED STORM AND ROOF DRAIN PIPING. 7. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING, BUILDING PAD, SITE AND UTILITIES 8. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY DITCHES, BACKFILL DITCHES. 9. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN, 10. DEGRADE DETENTION BASIN TO FINISHED GRADE. 11. REMOVE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. KEYNOTES 1. SEDIMENT FENCE, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C8.1. 2. INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C8.1. 3. CONSTRUCTION ENTRY, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C8.1. 4, CONCRETE WASHOUT, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C8.1. 5. FILTER FABRIC DITCH CHECK, SEE DETAIL, SHEET C8.1. 5. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET. 7. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE, SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET. 8. JUTTE MATTING OR SIMILAR GEO- TEXTILE, PLACE AT UPPER BANK ABOVE OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL BASIN AND OVERFLOW SHOULD BE STABILIZED QUICKLY WITH STRAW BLANKET. 9. HEADWALL, CONNECT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE. CL Z� r- O a cC w M � W w r 0 5 s 0 ° L 0 Ln cV 00 Ln 50 25 0 50 r=7 REA Drawings NORTH p Rezonina/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 o o O HIO Utilities Protection LUR n $ p ojed Number SERVICE &D Q Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 E A09_009 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) ° s a _ d Sheet Title SITE EROSION SANDS - CONTROL PLAN & DETAILS LL n DECKER Sheet Number � m 1 CPS / C8 ENGINEERS iii SURVEYORS 3 0 w 9 w 0 U z S N� W Zem am 2J � w id r L� i a , C ,i i „ „ „ „ „ „ ------------------------------------------------------- ----- - - - - -- ------------------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- -- --- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - --- - --------------------------------- - - - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- - - - - -- - / - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -- -- ------- -------- - - - - -- _- - - - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- -------------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- -- ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -- - - - -- -- - - - - - - -, -------- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - --------------------- - - - - -- ----- -_ - - -- U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 -------------------- - - -- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY TABLE CONTOUR ELEVATION 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 50 YEAR 100 YEAR PREDEVELOPED Q 5.56 10.07 16.42 21.90 30.74 38.82 47.82 POST DEVELOPED Q 25.81 33.96 43.93 43.93 51.71 63.53 84.87 ALLOWABLE RELEASE (SFIR) 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 6.27 9.14 ACTUAL RELEASE 0.58 0.71 0.83 0.92 1.03 3.31 7.46 POND DEPTH /ELEVATION 905.06 905.59 906.22 906.72 907.45 907.64 907.84 DETENTION BASIN AREA CONTOUR ELEVATION CONTOUR AREA (SF) 910.0 55,336 909.0 51,590 908.0 47,928 907.0 44,299 906.0 40,762 905.0 37,393 904.0 34,126 903.5 32,531 S.F.I.R. DRAINAGE AREA RELEASE RATE AREA (AC) 1295 4.61 1300 9.33 1320 0.25 TOTAL 14.19 SITE DATA IMPERVIOUS TRIBUTARY SITE AREA (AC) AREA (AC) BMW / MINI 6.33 10.61 * FUTURE 2,14 3.58 DEVELOPEMENT TOTAL 8.47 14.19 * ASSUMES IMPERVIOUS SITE AREA WILL BE 60% WATER QUALITY (2.2 Vb) REQUIRED PROVIDED (CF) (CF) 25,916 27,049 60 30 0 60 %J NORTH OHIO Protection SERVICE Call Before You Dig 1- 800 - 362 -2764 CALL TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG (NON MEMBERS MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY) SANDS DECKER C P S iNU"TNRRR C • CT TRIM' Ex j °s % / s n E s - i o � a 1 Z L m Drawings CL O a Z w LU 0 5w s ai �L L 7 C Ln cV 00 LO a Re oninp/PDP 08/01111 ■ Informal P&Z 09/19111 0 0 0 Project Number Sheet Title TRIBUTARY AREA MAP Sheet Number Cam] r - � L N tZ 6.� mo 1 \ \ Ex. Stm. CB TC 911.03' 4' PVC E 908.86' \ 72" CPP 9 \ m i Ex Stm. CB q N. 12" CPP NW S 90838' W°�. °+•� 7C 9122r '�. 4' CPP N N W ( E not 8' P found) Q YY' W (was not found) Zi e� Bottom E7. - 909.9r Ex Stm. Lg Wes. �• O � `� �'� mo w� .q 15 C R o � �a \� s \ 4 \ \ \ r dB q 0 \ n \\ ? `+� Ex. 8' Wooer Line 00 d'l r' (Approx. Location Per Plans) e n `r'P \ o SCALE. 1" = 40' 0 40 80 \t mss. ` ` �� \ � x�`�\ •Y v fr V. ol \ \ �� GRAPH/C SCALE .r \ \ \ dry. 914.78 = _ 2) Ex. Water Pit M. _ - -- W x E7J<�9 9D (S�uth \� ����� x x -x- 9'S75 Lid E7. = . 91255 X912.35 911. o - . Bottom or PH 90 .3B' °°nom �san� _e "SCIR. - - - -- son I'm J14" 1D. kon x 914: x 91520 x 91450 x 67 x91331 Ppe w /V6p -Fad Ex Sat. MH T" 7C 91505' 8' PVC E 899.94' x 91490 x 91509 x 91433 �Ex Stm. CB 7C 91234' 8" PVC S 908.89' 8' PYC SW 909.06' x x 12' fPP N 90888' 91520 91492 91401 x 91504 x 91454 X Stm. CB w TC 91248' ; 8' PVC N 9119.06' x 91459 x 91391 a 2 % Ex Trench Drain �e t Top of grate O. 9733/'j III \ � / e v 8 112' PVC S 911.26' x9/4857 x ' x I II x x x 91 B4 91354 91364 914.05 91342 ten \ o Fv .' /l Asphalt II la Commercial \Sign { 1 P.B. g \\ x II 916. s \ \9\ 91453 x j 91508 x 91450 x 914.04 Q •a Concre e � E (r YPrco/ A IA i x917.46 Q 917.60 6 917.24 x 916.741 x 91491 x 91432 Ex Stm. CB (Roumd) EA 7C 916.63' {y -"� 12' PVC N 910.63' /' ° 8" PYC N 91073' ,y 15' Pis W 9100.3' ask Line Botto D.. = 909. 917.B1 x 91869 x 91591 x 91494 x 91478 7C 911.47' W� I 8" PVC SW 909.02' $ 911.51 rF 12' CPP N 90852' x 12' CPP S 90&50' A % m t stm E _ _ _ g � ®� x72895 91325 f t » 912.01 2" Om _ _ __ 9°' @ __18 o 12.64 97 .1 x 911.60 4`- Fuueell Pump end Credit Card Key Pod 7 °V0 • y t ,y 'Cm Pz ph °t r O,o T L x , X �z x 1 Fuel Cops 91220 5.�� 9 .19 912. T r ® 911.5 913.28 1x 911 • - � x 912.28 rgn � / Concrete `�{ljetro. sYD oUse 7x e �• I F�% R.D. /Y� Controf M 041 ; 8 p \ A e - 4 cret or 0 0 o rive ?, R oa n 0 D k o; x or .gym T 5. Trash Compactor W1 Romp Trash Compactor Controls Ex Trench Drain \�� oo� t( onc. Bose Seated Shut "N o J 91145 GO 81.x14 912.6 - 0 0 0 Ex. Underground Electric Line ° J R. . 8'� a,l (Located Per Point M arkings R,D �rox, Loa Ex Son. 09 Trop L.L.C. CAR MAC Lid EL = 91128' - - -- . 14780 AG Top of Wbter 906.78' (�.r1,.y� iNS7R. 200205010109350 \�J x x P.N. 273 - 008212 Exiting Two Story Brick, ' Stucco & Glass Building �n 0 H.N. 6335 • I r1 R a W C C, 16 F/oo Fin /sh Floor (3' Door u (0oor Elev. = 97350' ) f/e sry F/ x °or Fin/sh Floor (12" Door) xa„ 9/ 93'000 Elev ❑Acc t Pad 913 50' II z 1 ) Asphalt 0 1 - a° °o a ^� ^ O ry O o _ r F °j \ °oi o'T _ x Asphalt x c li r / p \ °of 81422��y N a7' 58' 11" W 465.00' 915 X 91514 Cap Fnd 91.x0 R = 330.00" /= 38'57'77" L = 224.36" Ch = 220.07" S 69'47 56 " E Corn Field x 91363 x 91327 x 91323 x 91.134 x 91294 x 91271 LEGEND a Sign ® Cable Television Drop ;sign Street Sign 0 Cable Television Pedestal q Area Light •G.v. Gas Valve 4 Yard Light aG Gas Service ob Light Pole ® Gas Meter Light Pole w /Sqr. Base P Gas Flag Q Light Pole w/Rnd. Base p Gas Marker 1 + Electric Guy oa.o. Clean Out Z I F Electric Marker ❑SIM CB TC 708.43 Catch Basin w/Top of Casting Elev. &Elea Trans.Electric Transformer J OS7M MH TC 708.43 Manhole w/Top of Casting Elev. B Electric Meter 2 cstm inlet 1c 707.28 Curb Inlet w/Top of Coating Elev. U s Electric Drop oos Down Spout � ® Electric Pull Box Q I IN Electric Pedestal oRD Roof Drain 1 ® Electric Outlet x�o8.53 Existing Elev. O Gutter OM.H. Electric Manhole x707.87 Existing Grade Elev. Ex. a Telephone Closure x 707.a Spot Elev. rZ GLN 0 Telephone Drop x 07.8 Proposed Elev. 120 18' IN Telephone Pull Box s Bollard r 18' B Telephone Pedastal • Wood Post BENCH MARK y7 ip x. Std Telephone Pole o Metal Post m Ex. Underground 7Hne M'aner Coble op 0 8 Utility Pole - Existing Gas Line (Approx. Lorntbn Per Phrna) bttaaPB Pull Box -w Existing Water Line s RC HT.P.B. Traffic Pull Box - uge Existing Underground Electric Line i le, eta Apr _ FH_ w w w aT.ae. Traffic Control Box -ohs Existing Overhead Electric Line p -- --- = - - -_- == °� = =---- - - -= - - -- - __ _ - o Traffic Signal x eusmess Park x - - x - -- - - �° E = 9 - ugt Existing Underground Telephone Line Aspha /t 9/1.BOEntrence 91.26 91090 91051 x 910 r5 90988 AT. yDy d Traffic Pale - oht Existing Overhead Telephone Line - T- - - - -� - - - _ _ d Traffic Pole w/ Walk - o hcat y Existing Overhead Cable Television Line m �camm trnarian orb &curter (Typical) I W 1 1 ®w.v Water Valve � cat y Existing Underground Cable Television Line - fi ° ° °_ - - -ARK Fire Hydrant -71 Existing Index Contour - - -- _ - _-- --- - __ _ -__ �___ ____ _ - - g Water Meter -709 Existing Intermediate Contour __ ____ _ -- _ _ _ --FF__ eW.s. Water Service x 12 x 91278 x 91152 Ex $ " so r �►• l - - x 9 1154 x81113 1058 O wen Monitoring Well max- Existing Fence Line - Antenna o Mail Box Flagpole Ex Stm. ce (W/emdow) Sprinkler 7C 911.60 I TREE LEGEND 18' RCP N 90538' 1 Tree Symbols do not represent trunk size or drip lines. x 912.99 x 913 12 91233 x 911.71 x 917.60 x 91.3) 911.26 Ex San. MH AL = Alder = Locust 7C 912 AP = A =Maple a' PVC w 895x3' 1 = Deciduous Tree Ash =Ash sh M M MG = Magnolia 8" PVC E 89539 BE BE = Boxelder Mu = Mulberry 8' PVC N 90.x92' (Inside &W) Bf = Balsam Fir NM = Norway Maple Batton E7. - 89559' BH = Beech Oak = Oak - Evergreen Tree BI = Birch 00 = Osage Orange ' x x BL = Black Locust O = Ornamental 91286 91.x05 912.24 911.53 x 911.14 x m 911.08 1,11 BIO = Black Oak PE = Peach I BM = Black Maple PL = Plum 1 BO = Bur Oak Pn = Pine - Dead Tree BT = Buckhorn PO = Pin Oak BIN = Basswood Pp Poplar BY = Buckeye PR = Pear Ca = Crabapple PtO = Post Oak �^ }�( = Shrub Cd = Cedar PW = Pussy Willow 4.> Y CE = Chinese Elm QA = Quaking Aspen x 91225 x 91210 x 911.67 x 91.19 x 911.09 x 911.11 x 811.07 CH = Chestnut Rdb = Redbud Cho = Chestnut Oak RM = Red Maple = Hedge Chy = Cherry RO = Red Oak CS = Chinese Sumae SG = Sweetgum CT = Catalpa SH = Shagbark Hickory 1 = Stump CW = Cottonwood SIM = Silver Maple DW = Dogwood SM = Sugar Maple Corn Field I TwT Twin Trunk Elm = Elm SO = Scarlet Oak x x = Fir = Fir S = Spruce 911.92 911.92 x 911.78 x x 911.59 911.51 911.34 6 11.05 x x TrT Tri n p n Trunk Gink = Ginko SS = Sassafras MuT = Multi Trunk Haw = Hawthorn SU = Sumac HB = Hackberry Sr = Sycamore 1 Hem = Hemlock TA = Thornapple BR& HL = Honey Locust Tu = Tulip Tree I H = Hickory T = Tree HY = Holl WAL = Walnut H CH = H WL = Willow = x 912.01 x 912.48 x 912.48 x 912.48 x 912.55 x 912.23 x 111.J2 J = Juniper WC Wild Cherry I 1 REFERENCE BENCH MARK Designation: N 33 RESET Aluminum disk set in top of parapet wall over NW abutment of Avery Road Bridge over U.S. 33, 2.5 ft. x 91279 x 91328 x 91348 x 91326 x 91315 x 91266 x911.82 above road. Elev. 948.583' (NAVD 88 Reference Datum) 1 BENCH MARK #1 1 x x x "X" of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the 91310 91367 91359 x 91320 x 91287 x 91223 x1171 north side of Venture Drive and east of business park entrance. 1 Elev. 913.80' I BENCH MARK #2 x91395 x 914 14 x 91402 x 91.154 x 91299 x 91249 x1218 "X" of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the 1 north side of Venture Drive and east of telephone and 1 gas markers. Elev. 910.98' BENCH MARK #3 x 91366 x 912.98 x 912.53 x 912.23 x 91317 x 912.77 x 91240 x 91204 BRENMINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC Main Entrance 5500 AG Corridor INST. 200403150056066 P.N. 273 - 011297 x 91304 x 912.71 x 91240 x 912.09 x 91.154 x 9130.3 x 91266 x 912.54 x 81384 x 91334 x 91303 x 91303 Corn Fietd x 91442 x 97,196 x 91377 x 91379 HOUSE NO. 6335 Finish Floor Elev. Floor Level Finish Floor Elev. First Floor Second Floor Main Entrance Corridor X 0452 x 81483 x 9fA x 91460 x 97404 x 91411 91348 1 "X" of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the x- >F north side of Venture Drive and east of Children's Close 4" Woven Wire Fence N 89 °16'34 " W 72500' to Home entrance. I i BENCH MARK #4 Elev. 908.78' 1 Chiseled square on west side of concrete base for light pole located south of Venture Drive and west of entrance to Children's Close to Home. Elev. 908.78' NOTE: The property contains a sprinkler /irrigation system. The exact routing for the water line for this system is unknown. id1011A Electric pedestals electric transformers and telephone closures may have been found during the field investigation. No field markings or utility drawings were provided to the surveyor depicting underground or overhead facilities that may connect to these services boxes. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES / \\ Two Working Days BEFORE YOU DIG C.F. BIRD & R.J. BULL, INC. Call 800 - 362 -2764 (Toll free) Engineers and Surveyors OHIO UTILITIES PROTECTION SERVICE 2875 W.Dubbn- GrmviueRoad Columbus, Ohio 43235 NON- MEMBERS Ph: (614) 761 -1661 MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY Fax: (614) 761 -1328 BIRDBULL@BDIDBULL.COM MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP SOUTH OF VENTURE DRIVE AND EAST OF 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY --------------------- j r - � L -. N ,r n O I W I Z I J 2 U ~ I I �-EX. Stm. hdet Ex. Stm. Inlet Tap Curb EL - 91223' 1 llrttr El. - 909.72' Tap Curb £L = 90737' 1 I 18" RCP S 904.73' 3. Gutter £l. - 906.81' ,yp 18" RCP NE 90463' N 18" RCP S 901.88' • v Ex. Stm. Inlet ; 18" RCP NE 901.84' Top Cab EL. - 9fa34 v Top Mkt 1 Gutter El. - 909.79' 60s, Ex. 2" PMMP Gas Line G Tap Curb EL. � 907.33' .� Lftr !7 908.80' 18' RCP N 805.07' BENCH MARK y2 / Mk (Approx. Location Per Plans) 18' RCP S 90213' 18" RCP N 902 BENCH MARK 3 w W err w Ex. 12" Water Line V. __F. (Approx. Location Per PlanswJ w W. w w err -- - -- - ___ - -_ -__ _ _ __ - IN v 909.7/ x 908.44 x 90909 Is x 8Qa82�a x 90&56 __ -_ x 909.32 x 907.94 - -- x 907.64 x907.39 7�x •�_ == x 90 - - x 908.43 Asphalt x = =x = =- x 5E - -� g VENTURE DR. 6 5 Asphalt - - - - - - -- Pie w /Cup Fn - - -- _�____--------- - - - - -- __ Approx. Loeatlon) _ d - -- � - -3 - - - -- - -- -- _ "_ -- 1258 T ( _- - - 1 -Combination Cu -6 & G -tter ( - -- - -- -- - - - -- - --- ; -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - -- ``cam -- - - - -- -- - -___ - x 9f244 x 91a26 x - - 8/02 - xgp97� x x 90857 R�r x x _ - - -- -- - - -- E /ec Ped. son -w0.- - - - n n- - - - a 9�Q x 6 - - 908 ,- - 90 £x. 8 Son x 90733 Ex. lo Sm e90 7.3 4_ _ Ex. underground Telephone Line - ��•�n - LOZZ7sm (A Laeo 80720 (Located Per Madrra) Ex. Sal. MH Ex Sbn. CS (W/Nindow) TC 9/0.84 £x San. 7C 906.88' (Buried below surface)Ex Swl. MH f8' RCP N 1 8' PIA: W 894.28' TC 90899' I 8" PLC £88423' 8" PLC W 89376' Bohan !7 902 TC 907.19' 38' 10" PLC" W 891.84' x x x x 8" PVC E 89306' 8' PLC" E 890.94' 911.26 911.00 911.18 911.01 97232 x 909.69 x 908.12 x 909.61 x 90B87 x 90897 x 909.03 x 908.99 x 90879 x 9OBJ2 x 90776 Corn Field Corn Field I Brush Lune 911.71 x 911.26 x 911.50 x 911.14 x 91232 x 9maJ x 909.69 .84 x 90990 x 908.78 x 90968 x 90961 x 909.37 x 90872 x 907.83 I I Floor Level LEGEND 6 11.07 x 91L 16 x 911.20 I I 1 11.05 x 9fa97 x 911.02 I BRENRJNGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC 1 4600 AC I 0 INST. 200411020252709 91.1 P.N. 273- 011297 xi 11.32 I I x 91a91 x 911.38 I x 911.82 x 911.45 x 911.71 I Corn Field I xl IL71 I x 9IL47 x 917.83 I x 1218 1 x 91227 x 912.28 x 9fa93 x 911.08 x x 911.25 911.58 x 911.77 x 91236 x 912.55 x 912.79 x 912.10 x 91249 x 91274 x 91 -109 x BIG& x 911.25 x 911.65 x 91211 x 91243 x 91307 x 0.• xbr' x x 91335 x 91-164 x- x- x- -x- 12 88 x-x-x- N 88 °10'53" W 261, 1 U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 (VARIABLE WIDTH) 1 FRA. 33-0.34 x 910.42 } x 911.08 x 911.65 x x 911.92 N �M - x 91210 x 91302 � 91203 h Line x 911.00 x 910.45 x Corn Fd1d 911.64 91254 x 911.14 x 911.00 x 911.38 x 909.90 x 909.74 x 909.12 x 909.63 x 909J6 x 90&62 x x 90026 907.47 x x 907.86 907.16 x 9fa3/ x 909.75 x 909.09 x 90845 x 907.90 BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC 4.842 AC MST. 200605010081503 P.N. 273 - 009976 x ara25 x 909.74 x 909.35 x 90893 x 908.39 x 9 /068 x 907.41 x 80778 Floor Level LEGEND x u a x 812.70 'O ro x 912.04 x 911.37 Brush Line Street Sign ® Cable Television Pedestal I 0 X 912.71 x 91237 91.1 Gas Valve 3/4" 1.0. ken ^ ' Pipe Fnd. N 8996'34" W 8579' x 907.41 x 80778 � 3/4" I.D. iron pipe w/ cap set unless otherwise noted. HOUSE NO. 6335 Finish Floor Elev. Floor Level LEGEND a Sign ® Cable Television Drop vSign Street Sign ® Cable Television Pedestal I 0 40 80 120 Area Light eay. Gas Valve x 909.49 x 909.22 4 Yard Light eG.s. Gas Service ob Light Pole g Gas Meter 1 9 Light Pole w /Sqr. Base P Gas Flag Q Light Pole w/Rnd. Base D Gas Marker d Electric Guy OC.o. Clean Out x 910.60 9 Electric Marker 0STM CB TC 705.43 Catch Basin w/Top of Casting Elev. x 90a56 AElec. Trane.Electric Transformer OSTM MH TC 708.43 Manhole w/Top of Casting Elev. B Electric Meter eStm inlet TC 707.28 Curb Inlet w/Top of Casting Elev. C Electric Drop oDS Down Spout e Electric Pull Box Electric Pedestal oRD Roof Drain x911.22 ® Electric Outlet x�G853 Existing Elev. O Gutter OM.H. Electric Manhole x707.87 Existing Grade Elev. Commercial .`;r n ® Telephone Closure x 707.8 Spot Elev. ® Telephone Drop x 07.8 Proposed Elev. Ex 4' Woven Wire Fence p Telephone Pull Box ■ Bollard / D Telephone Pedastal a Wood Post R = 330.00' /- 03339 d Telephone Pole ■ Metal Post L = 323' / 8 Utility Pole - Existing Gas Line Ch = 3.23' oP.B. Pull Box -w Existing Water Line S 89 °33'24" E / ■T.P.B. Traffic Pull Box - uge Existing Underground Electric Line ©T.G.B. Traffic Control Box - ohs Existing Overhead Electric Line o Traffic Signal - ugt Existing Underground Telephone Line _ - -- 8 Traffic Pole -oht Existing Overhead Telephone Line x' , b Traffic Pole w/ Walk - ohcat Existing Overhead Cable Television Line - - - ew.v Water Valve -ucat Existing Underground Cable Television Line Children'E pos 0 - S 06'11'35" E ' RF•H. IB Fire Hydrant Water Meter - 7t G Existing Index Contour $ ®concrete Apron 2415 e W.S. Water Service -709 Existing Intermediate Contour O Well Monitoring Well - x-x- Existing Fence Line 096 Ex. Underground Electric Line n0. Antenna em (Approx. Location Per Plans) ■ Mail Box 90 Flagpole TREE LEGEND � eENCV MARK f/4 Sp rinkler Tree Symbols do not represent trunk size or drip lines. M� L DING NOAT H M EST MEDICAL OFFICE BU6O/NG = Deci duous Tree AL = Alder Lo = Locust A = Apple M =Maple t90Z 13 R = 111.50' CgVOQN/N /UM 4067 AC A =Ash MG = Ma 110!10 9 Vrn+ec Si /= 80 07'50" CONDO pa 1`07, Pa 37 L 155.94' BE = B alsam NM er = No Bf = Balsam Fir = Norway Maple = INST. 200270290274285 a Ch = 143.54' P.N. 273 -0f7W3 Oa B =Beech Oak =Oak S 46 °15'30" E = Evergreen Tree BI = Birch 00 = Osage Orange BL =Black Locust Om = Ornamental e °® BID = Black Oak PE = Peach _ - - - -e Asphalt BM = Black Maple PL = Plum BO = Bur Oak Pn = Pine x 90711 907 x90699 = Dead Tree BT = Buckhom PO = Pin Oak BIN = Basswood P = Poplar BY = Buckeye PR = Pear _ Ca = Crabapple PtO = Post Oak '� ® Stm ® O 72' =Shrub Cd = Cedar PW = Pussy Willow CE = Chinese Elm QA = Quaking Aspen ��prau I CH = Chestnut Rdb = Redbud x, 8' st YAppro I r ^^^'�� Hedge Cho = Chestnut Oak RM = Red Maple Chy = Cherry RO = Red Oak = CS = Chinese Sumae SG = Sweetgum x x * Ex Sim. MH 906'67 906.56 19OZ14 7C 906.24' = Stump CT = Catalpa SH CW = Cottonwood SIM = Shagbark = Silver Maple Hickory N 8' PLC" W 899.79' DIN = Dogwood SM = Sugar Maple p Asphalt 12 OPP E 899 74 TwT = Twin Trunk Elm = Elm SO = Scarlet Oak i Bottom El. = 899.59' TrT = Triple Trunk Fir = Fir Sp = Spruce Gink = Ginko SS = Sassafras A MuT = Multi Trunk Haw = Hawthorn SU = Sumac HB = Hockberry Syc = Sycamore Hem = Hemlock TA = Thoma ple x x X 1 90&90 90144 1 Boa 54 HL = Honey Locust Tu = Tulip Tree H - Hickory T = Tree X�Concrete Curb (Typical) HY =Hollyy WAL = Walnut u H CH - Horsechestnut WL = Willow p ry 0 J = Juniper WC = Wild Cherry n 90Z37 x 906'95 x p 909.84 REFERENCE BENCH MARK a Designation: N 33 RESET N X Aluminum disk set in top of parapet wall over NW tl abutment of Avery Road Bridge over U.S. 33, 2.5 ft. above road. m x x w x 9o75a 90764 0�7 Elev. 948.583' (NAVD 88 Reference Datum) m p h BENCH MARK #1 � 3/4" I.D. iron pipe w/ cap set unless otherwise noted. HOUSE NO. 6335 Finish Floor Elev. Floor Level Finish Floor Elev. N ALE, I' _ 40' Second Floor Main Entrance Corridor I 0 40 80 120 x 91017 x 909.85 x 909.49 x 909.22 x 90856 x 90&18 x 90812 91222 N 4 GRAPHIC SCALE Corn Field I N Asphalt a k e x 91a9/ x 910.60 x 910.39 x 9fa22 x 90955 x 90905 x 90a56 a x912 ® ®_ ( x 911.49 x911.22 LA R/W 811.18 x9 133 x910.24 x x 909, i8 _ Commercial .`;r n .27 N 89'14'48" W 384.15 Ex 4' Woven Wire Fence � 3/4" I.D. iron pipe w/ cap set unless otherwise noted. HOUSE NO. 6335 Finish Floor Elev. Floor Level Finish Floor Elev. First Floor Second Floor Main Entrance Corridor NOTE: The property contains a sprinkler /irrigation system. The exact routing for the water line for this system is unknown. 1 d1011A Electric pedestals electric transformers and telephone closures may have been found during the field investigation. No field markings or utility drawings were provided to the surveyor depicting underground or overhead facilities that may connect to these services boxes. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES / \\ Two Working Days BEFORE YOU DIG C.F. BIRD & R.J. BULL, INC. Call 800 - 362 -2764 (Toll free) Engineers and Surveyors OHIO UTILITIES PROTECTION SERVICE 2875 W.Dubsn- GrmviueRoad Columbus, Ohio 43235 NON- MEMBERS Ph: (614) 761 -1661 MUST BE CALLED DIRECTLY Fax: (614) 761 -1328 BIRDBULL@BIRDBULL.COM I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J �i:i1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I � L-------- - - - - -� XV C CC; � NJ NOF6fPE 819A8B.]b00 I F. 819.9M.OFYO I w�.WWl.mn ' 6 11 , ' 1' -6" 6 LED ILLUMINATED LETTERS NOTE: DOTS ARE NON ILLUMINATED, SURFACE MOUNTED, 2' THICK ALUMINUM SQUARES CAST CONCRETE BY PROVIDED BY OWNER ) "MAG" GREEN \TCH ::ESS PORT ONINBOARD 3N DEALER IDENTIFICATION SIGN a a a IP > ° 2 LU W N N U LU W °. W °U °. W It .�0 Illuminated Channel Letters On Concrete Wall Scale: 3/8" = I LETTERS= .062 ALUMINUM LETTER BODIES W/ 6" DEEP RETURNS, FACES TO BE. 125" TRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC W/ I" TRIMCAP EDGE RETAINERS ILLUMINATION= WHITE, INTERNAL, HIGH OUTPUT, LOW VOLTAGE LED ARRAYS, W/ STEP DOWN TRANSFORMERS HOUSED WITHIN LETTERS INSTALLATION= LETTERS SHIM MOUNTED TO CONCRETE WALL w/ 318 "x1.5 "L LAG & SHIELD ANCHORS (3) PER LETTER MINIMUM CONCRETE WALL- CONSTRUCTED BY G.C. ALLOWING FOR APPROPRIATE SIZED FOOTER & ACCESS CAVITY TO BE CAST INTO BACK. MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 5825 Venture Drive Dublin, OH L - - - - -� © COPYRIGHT 2DD7 EXISTING 16" THICK ALUMINUM LETTERS REPAINTED TO MATCH BMW SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE g WALL 9 SERVICE =:E8.50" SS' -0" AREA sicincom ❑ Design •Fabrication •Erection •Secace PROJECT NAME MAG REVISION SALES BMS DATE 6 -14 -2011 LOCATION ACCESSORYSIGNS DESIGN LEE SCALE 114 "- 12" CITY DUBLIN STATE OHIO ( #4) 11 -4 -2011 SIZE 14 PROJECT# 11-329 Ali i cm 6' -0'' Scale: 1/2" =I 1 11 6' -0'' DOUBLE FACED SIGN m Scale: 1/2" =I MCHffE&TURX ALUANCE 1e6 NOi1i11 FlFi1i SiAffT I OOLAJMU60F10 48216 P 01 4AS9.7e00 I F 01 4ASS.0eoo I wwAr*hW1.00m BRAND IDENTIFICATION SIGN VERTICAL SIGN SHELL = I" ALUMINUM BENT AND SECURED TO SLOPING RETAINING WALL BMW AND MINI LOGO SURFACED MOUNTED TO ALUMINUM MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 5825 Venture Drive Dublin, OH BMW BRAND SIGN EXAMPLE OF EXISTING CONDITION @ VOLKSWAGEN SERVICE DRIVE MINI BRAND SIGN D Q m N n 45, M co co � F 9" 11' 131W W W U) IL a N J � m ROUTED ® 7 BRUSHED O ALUMINUM Z { W w /ACRYLIC BREAK IN 'PUSHTHRU U) ILLUMINATED STRIPS J N LETTERS DUE TO CABINET U) p U) CONSTRUCTION (FROM & BACK) BMW N PUSH -THRU ACRYLIC _ O N ATED O BTRIPS SMPS 0 Z O a 00 5 W 4 11 ILLUMINATED N O LOGOS Q O o = O � - w I L • M LWMINATED "PUSH -THRU' LIGHTLY FROSTED ACRYLIC STRIP W/ TRANS. WHITE VINYL (0 W QW ON FACE - 1'WIDE. 20 BACK & FRONT OF PYLON LU _ Z U: J • W d1 b L i i i i i LUG .HIDE �,�..�� z U0 rL o ILLUMINATED LOGO TOWER SIGN 0 SCALE 3/8" =1' . .125" BRUSHED ALUMINUM CABINET w/ VERTICAL GRAIN ASSEMBLEDOVER WELDED STEEL FRAMEWORK. CLEAR - COATED • CABINET FRAMEWORK SECURED TO STEEL SUPPORT PIPE (3.500 O.D.) SLEEVED INTO FOUNDATION PIPE . 4.25" O.D. FOUNDATION PIPE IS SET IN 38" DIAMETER x 5 FT. DEEP CONCRETE FOUNDATION & EXTENDS ABOVE GRADE 54" • CONCRETE FOUNDATION & CONCRETE BASE CONNECTED WITH REBAR AS REQUIRED • FOUNDATION, FOUNDATION PIPE, &ABOVE GRADE BASE INSTALLED BY G.C. . BOTTOM OF PYLON CABINET TO MOUNT TO TOP OF CONCRETE BASE . MAG LOGO Q TOP IS ROUTED INTO BRUSHED ALUMINUM FACE w / ACRYUC PUSHED -THRU & FLUORESCENT ILLUMINATION • SIDES OF ACRYLIC ARE LIGHTLY FROSTED w/ TRANSLUCENT GREEN VINYL APPLIED TO FIRST SURFACE • 12 DIFFERENTAUTO LOGOS w/ BASIC OUTLINE SHAPES ROUTED INTO ALUMINUM CABINET. BACKED UP W/ TRANSLUCENT "BLACK AT DAY- WHITE AT NIGHT' ACRYLIC i w/ GRAPHICS PORTRAYED IN MATCHING BRUSHED ALUMINUM PAINT or VINYL (Use Customer Supplied Art) U • BACK OF PYLON CABINET TO PROVIDE ACCESS THRU DECORATIVE FLANGE MOUNTED'PERFORATED" w` PANELS w/ WITH FLAT ALUMINUM PANELS BEHIND. BOTH PAINTED FLAT BLACK 0 C . 800/MA FLUORESCENT INTERIOR ILLUMINATION BEHIND ALL LOGOS & BEHIND COPY AT TOP FOR MAIN LOGO. U o ALSO 1" WIDE MIDDLE ACRYLIC STRIP IS ILLUMINATED THRU LIGHTLY FROSTED SIDES � i WITH TRANSLUCENT WHITE VINYL APPLIED TO FACE SURFACE. Y,o • 277 POWER TO SIGN BY G.C. a ° • SEE DRWG # 98593 -A3 FOR PLACEMENT & DETAILS OF LOGOS 20' -6" (241") Disconnect 40" Switch LM2 -B 11" 1 261/4" Small Cantilevers (30 ") LM2 and CNM2 Elevation Scale 3/8" = 1' -0" @ 11 x 17 15' -10" (190 ") a IMMM 19.5" lettering I CNM2 I ® � ■I� End view at Wall Bracket (every T -0" typ.) Wall Bracket: Scale 1" =1'0° Plan View Scale 3/8" = 1' -0" @ 11 x 17 26 1/4" Specifications Sign modules are fabricated from .090 aluminum faces painted G2. Internally illuminated routed faces. Lettering is clear acrylic push- through with 20 gauge Polished Stainless Steel on First Surface Logo modules are identical to pylon modules, mounted with stainless steel hardware. Material Descriotion M1 200mm pole - bearing structure. Length as required (2" past outside cantilevers, typ.) M2 Cantilever supports at each end of facade module (30" ±) w/ %" S.S. mounting hardware M3 LED insert strip on front of bearing structure (typ) M4 Blank insert strip on building side of bearing structure (typ) M5 End Cap (typ) M6 Wall Brackets: Spaced no further than T -0" as required for overall length. Minimum three required per bearing structure. M7 Middle Support Brackets: on modules longer than 10 feet. Brackets add stability to sign structure. Spaced 6' -0" on center (CNM1 -3) and 3-0" on center for a CN M4 Graphic Colors G1 BMW F1 Charcoal G2 BMW White G3 Clear Anodized Aluminum Electrical Requirements 120 volt circuit required dedicated to sign only. Power to sign to be installed and supplied by others. 0QI Description 3: ESB432 -14 @ 2.34 amps 1: LED Transformer @ 0.5 amps = 7.52 Total amps LAMPS: 3: HO 36 FL Lamps 6: HO 72 FL Lamps 7 3/4" 0 V A 6 Face view of wall bracket MAG BMW THIS DESIGN IS SUBMITTED c THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE CUSTOMER APPROVAL: IMPORTANT: 206 rower Drive WI . (' � INSTALLEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH United Florida 34677 • • Columbus, OH AS PART OF OUR PROPOSAL SP THE RECUIREMENTS OFARTICLE PERMANENTACCESSTO THE BACK SIDE OF United unitedsigns Btems.com August 01, 2011 AND IS TO REMAIN OUR us wo OF THE NATIONALELECTRICAL SIGNATURE THEWALLIS REQUIRED FORINSTALUTION 8 &88- 704 -1516 r W X s BE AND I OR OTHER DATe _ `S� PROPERTY EXCLUSIVELY AND OFTHE SIGN THIS r" BMW- MAG -CNM2 UNTIL ACCEPTED AND INC L GROUNDING DING APPROVAL RECEIVED BY UNITED IF IT IS NOTAVAIIABLE R MUST BE PRWmEO S trs A Division oNni[ed Adva C �� BS NDING BY THE CUSTOMER BEFORE INSTALLATION. IN Sign Companies, Int. 'e r" JJM 1a1tx17 APPROVEDBYPURCHASE. ANDBONDINGOF REV DESCRIPTION DATE BV THES SIG DATE'_ Elevation Scale 3/8" = 1'0" @ 11 x 17 7 3l4" 0 V � W A 6" Face view of wall bracket e ■I End view at Wall Bracket (every 8' -0" minimum) Wall Bracket: Scale 1 " =1'0" Plan Vi�vv Scale 3/8" = 1'0" @ 11 x 17 Showing Bracket Locations Specifications Sign modules are fabricated from .090 aluminum faces painted G2. Internally illuminated routed faces. Lettering is acrylic push- through 7328 white. Logo modules are identical to pylon modules, mounted with stainless steel hardware. Material Description M1 200mm pole - bearing structure. Length as required (2" past outside cantilevers, typ.) M2 Cantilever supports at each end of facade module (30" ±) w/ %d' S.S. mounting hardware M3 LED insert strip on front of bearing structure (typ) M4 Blank insert strip on building side of bearing structure (typ) M5 End Cap (typ) M6 Wall Brackets: Spaced no further than T -0" as required for overall length. Minimum three required per bearing structure. M7 Middle Support Brackets: on modules longer than 10 feet. Brackets add stability to sign structure. Spaced 6' -0" on center (CNM1 -3) and 3' -0" on center fora CNM4 Graphic Colors G1 BMW F1 Charcoal G2 MINI 929 Black G3 Clear Anodized Aluminum Electrical Requirements 120 volt circuit required dedicated to sign only. Power to sign to be installed and supplied by others. Cwt : Description 1: ESB432 -14 @ 2.34 amps 1: ESB1040 -14 @ 3.41 amps 1: LED Transformer @ .5 amps = 6.25 Total amps LAMPS: 3: HO 36 FL Lamps 3: HO 108 FL Lamps 2" TVD Offset hinge as required I all CNMS and LMS mall 37 3/8" Mid Supports eq'd Every 6'0" OC. 120 V Electric Feed by Others 3ealtite Connection Required: MAG BMW THIS DESIGN IS SUBMITTED THIS SIGN IS INTENDED To BE CUSTOMER APPROVAL: IMPORTANT: 206 Tower Drive C3 1 INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH Oldsmar, Florida 34677 • Columbus, OH AS PART OF OUR PROPOSAL PROPERTY EXCLUSIVELY g SA° THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE PERMANENT ACCESS TO THE BACK SIDE OF United uni[edsignsyste 3467 AND IS TO REMAIN OUR e Us Soo OF THE NATIONAL ELECTR CAL SIGNATURE THE WALL IS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION August 01, 2011 ST ORE CODE AND I OR OTHER DATE AND WIRING OF THE SIGN. J S' 888 - 704 -1516 MINI - MAG -CNM2 APPLICABLE LOCAL woes. THIS UNTIL ACCEPTED AND 11� 5 INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING APPROVAL RECEIVED BY UNITED IF CUSTO INST PROVIDED Systems AOivi of pa Advantage �•. Jim e. APPROVED BYPURCHASE. AND BONDING OFTHESIGN. DATE BYTHE CUSTOMER INSTALLATION Sign Companies, Inc. ne Sze 11 x 17 REV# DESCRIPTION DATE BY 1 T -3 7/8" Disconnect Switch t City Of Dublin DRAFT Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 RECORD OF ACTION www.d ublinohiousa.gov JANUARY 12, 2012 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. MAG Planned District 6335 Perimeter Loop Roac Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3 -1 5825 Venture Drive Midwestern Auto Group PUD — BMW & Mini Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Final Development Plan Proposal: Incorporating approximately 8.73 acres to the Midwestern Auto Group Planned Unit Development District to expand the automobile dealership campus with a 45,000- square -foot building addition for the BMW and Mini franchises. The site is located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with Perimeter Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with a preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Tim Galli, Car MAG Park LLC and Brentlinger Real Estate Co. LLC; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II. Contact Information: (614)410- 4675,chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend approval to City Council of this rezoning with preliminary development plan because this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria, provides the opportunity for the retention of a successful business within the city, and includes a cohesive campus development, with three conditions: 1) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; 2) That the text be revised to permit only one dealership identification sign 14 to serve the entire site; and 3) That the text be revised to require interior signs to be located a minimum of three feet away from any windows or exterior walls. Brad Parish, Architectural Alliance, on behalf of the applicant, agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: Approval of this rezoning with preliminary development plan was recommended to City Council. RECORDED VOTES: Chris Amorose Groomes Yes Richard Taylor Yes Todd Zimmerman Yes Warren Fishman Yes Amy Kramb Yes John Hardt Yes Joseph Budde Yes Page 1 of 2 iJ [73 21 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 12, 2012 2. MAG Planned District 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 5825 Venture Drive Midwestern Auto Group PUD — BMW & Mini Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Final Development Plan MOTION #2: To approve this final development plan because this proposal complies with the proposed development text and preliminary development plan, the final development plan criteria and existing development in the area with nine conditions: 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; S) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; 7) That the exterior building finish materials be revised to match what is used in Subarea A; 8) That a fountain and aerator be incorporated into the eastern portion of the decorative pond and an aerator be incorporated into the east stormwater management pond to provide sufficient aeration; and 9) That the applicant work with Planning to field - verify the installation of the proposed junipers along the north side of the decorative pond Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale LLC agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This final development plan was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Chris Amorose Groomes Yes Richard Taylor Yes Todd Zimmerman Yes Warren Fishman Yes Amy Kramb Yes John Hardt Yes Joseph Budde Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 1 of 8 DRAFT 1. MAG Planned District 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3 -1 5825 Venture Drive Midwestern Auto Group PUD — BMW & Mini Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 11- O49Z /PDP /FDP Final Development Plan Chris Amorose Grooms said the following application involves incorporating approximately 8.73 acres to the Midwestern Auto Group Planned Unit Development District to expand the automobile dealership campus with a 45,000- square -foot building addition for the BMW and Mini franchises. She said the site is located on the south side of Venture Drive approximately 750 feet south of the intersection of Perimeter Drive. She said the application also includes a Final Development Plan for all site improvement details. She said the application consists of two components; the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan and a Final Development Plan. She said there will be two motions; the Rezoning Preliminary will go to Council for final decision. She said the Commission has the final authority on the Final Development Plan application. Claudia Husak said this is a combined application for a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan and a Final Development Plan for the MAG Planned Unit Development (PUD). She said the applicant did provide an informal introduction of this case in October 2011. Ms. Husak said approximately 24 acres will become the MAG PUD District, we are incorporating the existing MAG campus which is about 15 acres and currently vacant land into a unified planned district for MAG. She said the applicant is removing portions of Subarea D, from Perimeter Center, which is primary an office center, and Subarea J -1, which was created for MAG in 2008 for vehicle storage while constructing the Volvo addition. Ms. Husak said there will be two subareas; Subarea A remains unchanged, the development text for the subarea is the same one this Board approved in 2009. She said Subarea B, the new area, is the eight acres being removed from Perimeter Center. She said the development text for Subarea B is modeled along the lines of Subarea A. She said a lot of the language, development standards, and regulations are repeated. She said there is an access point on Venture Drive which is being incorporated with this rezoning; the intention is for customers to use the loop road around the site with primary access from Perimeter Loop Road and Venture Drive. She said there are two additional display fingers along the west side of the site to continue the design from the original campus. Ms. Husak said the retention pond on the east side is included in this proposal; it is designed to manage stormwater for the site to be developed and the land to the east. She said the decorative pond along US 33 is also in this proposal. She said for the existing subarea the applicant did not have to provide screening along US 33 as required in the Zoning Code. Ms. Husak said staff has advised the applicant to place screening in this area for the new development site. She said in October the Commission was supportive of continuing what exists today and to provide a unified landscape area along the highway. She said the applicant is proposing three foot tall screening where the Code would require a six foot tall screen. She said there is a mound and landscape trees. Ms. Husak said staff recommends the applicant continue with the screening as required in the Code due to the concerns of City Council. She said the applicant has provided a section drawing to give a preview of the site, the first section looks across the decorative pond toward the BMW portion of the building. She said there are a landscape screen and a drive aisle. She said the second section looks toward the first car display finger and the three -foot mound is included with the orchard like tree arrangement. She said there is a shrub hedge where the display area would start. She said the last section looks across the stormwater management pond toward the northern area. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 2 of 8 DRAFT Ms. Husak said the applicant is proposing a total of 44,000 square feet of building, they are proposing to construct 40,000 square feet and have included a 4,000- square -foot area which would be in the vehicle service area. She said the applicant has revised the floor plan of the building moving both show rooms closer to the highway. She said BMW is in the western portion of the building and the Mini showroom is in the eastern portion. She said all of the service function is towards the rear of the building; there is a non - retail car wash for customers only, and a truck route which would have vehicle delivery off Venture Drive. Ms. Husak said the proposal meets the Code in terms of parking setbacks and lot coverage. She said they are including the lower level service drive currently on the premises. She said the modern look is continued with the same material as is on the existing building. She said the applicant includes the brightly colored accents in the Mini showroom which the Commission requested be removed. She said there is a condition to remove the brightly colored accents. Ms. Husak said the applicant is continuing with the sign details which are in the existing development. She said the applicant is proposing a ten -foot dealership identification sign, which will be incorporated within the pond. She said the applicant currently has a dealership identification sign on their current campus, staff is requesting the text be revised to only allow one of the signs and for the Final Development Plan to be revised to show only one sign. Ms. Husak said a campus identification sign is also being proposed, those signs do exist on the other entrances to the site and is an appropriate sign to have. She said there is a detail that shows the sign as 15 feet, 4 inches, it is in the Development Text to be 15 feet. She said we are requiring that is revised. She said the applicant is proposing a MAG Mini wall sign on the eastern elevation. She said there will be a BMW sign on the southern elevation. She said both signs have been revised to meet the 15 -foot height limitation which is in the Zoning Code. Ms. Husak said the applicant shows signs on the two ramps into the service area and those signs include the names of the franchises, staff requests those are removed because they are not permitted. Richard Taylor asked if the signs are going into the service area. Ms. Husak said a service sign would be permitted; it is the BMW and Mini signs that are not permitted. Chris Amorose Grooms said she believes the signs already exist; and asked are those not approved signs. Ms. Husak said they have free standing identification signs near the ramps. Ms. Husak said Planning is recommending approval of the rezoning with the Preliminary Development Plan with three conditions: 1) That the development text be revised to require property perimeter screening from US 33/ SR 161 as required by the Zoning Code; 2) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; and, 3) That only one dealership identification sign be permitted to serve the entire site. Ms. Husak said for the Final Development Plan, Planning is recommending approval with seven conditions: 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 3 of 8 DRAFT 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; 5) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; and 7) That the plans be revised to show adherence to the Code - required property perimeter screening along US 33 /SR 161six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet. Ben Hale Jr., 37 West Broad Street, Columbus Ohio, said the applicant has tried to incorporate the comments from the last meeting. He said in earlier drawings there were cars that faced US 33, where the pond is located; those have been removed so there is not a display in the area of the pond. He said the pond is atheistic; parking faces the building for customers. Brad Parrish, Architecture Alliance, 165 North 5"' Street, Columbus Ohio, said with the completion of the Volvo and Porsche expansion last year, it is the desire of MAG to relocate the BMW and Mini facility currently on Post Road to this site. He said the wall signs have been lowered to 15 feet, and removed the vehicle display pad. He said the design has been revised to include the overall footprint of the building by combining some of the programs within the building, which is why the Mini showroom is now located on the front of the building along SR 161. Mr. Parrish said we did not see a need to have an additional curb cut along Venture Drive, the elimination allowed customers to be controlled around the loop on -site and create all service traffic on one curb cut along Venture Drive. He said the mounding was reduced on the SR 161 frontage from six feet to three feet. He said the previous recommendation was to continue with what is currently there, which was zero mounding. He said a good compromise would be to propose a three -foot mound along SR 161 and continue the landscape orchard. Mr. Parrish said we agreed to have a six -foot mound on the adjacent property. He said the east side of the pond would start a three -foot mound which would gradually go to six feet at the east property line to Children's Hospital. Mr. Parish said for the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan we would like to keep the three -foot mound as proposed, the development text will be revised to allow the tree replacement on the adjacent parcel to the east. He said the reason we have two subareas for this PUD is there are two different investor groups that invest in both subareas. He said from a tax and vesting standpoint it is best to keep them as separate as possible. He said there is a potential that BMW could be sold to another dealer. He said they would like to keep both signs so MAG has an identity and the adjacent property, if sold, could have its own identity. Mr. Parrish said we agree with all of the conditions for the Final Development Plan except for the one concerning the mound, we would like to keep the mound. Ms. Amorose Grooms asked if the signs are on the service bays in the other building. Mr. Parrish said they are, the word Service is at the top of the concrete wall, at the top of the ramp there are brand identification signs. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 4 of 8 DRAFT Richard Taylor asked if not having the signs will cause problems. Mr. Parrish said no, they were wanted on the wall to direct the customers. Ms. Husak said staff is suggesting the signs can be used that are on the exisitng site. She said they are identified in the development text as Brand Identification Signs. Mr. Parrish said that type of sign it is a better solution for us. John Hardt asked if the BMW being proposed is text or a logo. Mr. Parrish said text. He said it is his understanding the word service and the arrow would remain but the BMW would be removed. Mr. Hardt asked why not have BMW Service in one line of text. Mr. Parrish said they are not objecting to removing the word BMW. Amy Kramb said she is in agreement with the mound going from three feet to six feet. She said she agrees with two dealership signs; specify that only one sign can be placed in the pond. Ms. Kramb asked if wall signs can have logos. Ms. Husak said yes. Ms. Kramb said in the development text it states the logos may exceed size limits imposed by the City of Dublin. Ms. Husak said that does not apply to the wall signs. Ms. Kramb said we already allow them to exceed the logo limit in Subarea A. Ms. Husak said some of the signs have just the logo. She said the wall logos cannot exceed 20 percent. Ms. Kramb asked if the logos can have as many colors as necessary. Ms. Husak said yes. Ms. Kramb asked if the directional signs have logos. Ms. Husak said no. Ms. Kramb said in the proposed development text, page 14, D2, Standard Signs, Interior Signs; should we specify that means not attached to windows. She said this would mean they could attach something to the inside of the window and it can be as large as they want, they can do what they want to the interior of the building. Ms. Husak said it will be specified it is a certain distance from the window. Ms. Kramb said anything can be placed on the interior of the window as long as it is a specific distance away from the window. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 5 of 8 DRAFT John Hardt said he is in agreement with the objective of City Council to have screens along SR 161. He said since half the campus has been developed with one type of treatment it does not make sense to change it in the middle of the campus. He said he would like the east and west to have the same treatment. Mr. Hardt said he does not have a problem with two dealer identification signs, the design should match. Ms. Husak said the Subarea A text limits the height of the sign to what is existing, we would have to revise the text to allow the signs to match. Mr. Hardt said it looks like there are a few catch basins dumping into the pond, he was worried the water may stagnate. He asked what the intent was behind the materials not being the same. Mr. Parrish said the intent with the new code of 2009, and making a continuous insulation on the exterior of the building was that EFIS would allow us to do that as opposed to stucco. Mr. Hardt said Mr. Parrish is talking about the Energy Code, in order to meet it one has to put the insulation on the outward side. He said he is not in favor of changing the materials on the outside of the building. Joe Budde said he agrees that the transition of the mounding from three feet to six feet makes sense. He said the two MAG signs should be of similar material and change the smaller one to one of the brands. He said he likes the Mini colors on the front of the building. Warren Fishman said he is not in favor of the two signs. He said if the ownership does change the applicant should come back to the Commission and apply for two signs. He said if the pond was made larger and made into a retention pond it would solve the flow problem, you said you were going to put a three foot mound behind the pond, it will make for a real dramatic look from the road. He said he would rather stick to the Code and make the mound six feet. Todd Zimmerman said there has to be something that can be done for the stucco problem. He said he agrees with the conditions staff has. He said the mounding is half of what Code requires. He said if we stay with the conditions we can stay with the Code and we can allow Council to remove conditions. Richard Taylor said he would prefer to see a single sign along SR 161 because it is a very distinctive building. He said the original intent of the screening in the Code was along the SR 161 along the lines of car dealerships that had large areas of cars sitting closer to the street; it was intended to avoid the parking lot appearance. He said in this case, there is a lot more architectural and decorative design and a lot of landscaping. He said he is inclined to not want to see the mound increase. Mr. Taylor said by not having the mound it allows the new building to be the signage and stand out. He said he liked the transition to where there is no mound to where the mound begins with a pond and gradually transition up from the three feet to the six feet. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she agrees with the step increase of the mounding, there are no indications in the drawing of any fixtures in the pond. She said it is going to need to have some water moving. She asked if there was a makeup well to assure the elevation of the pond. Mr. Parrish said yes, there is a well to supply this front pond. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would like to see a bubbler on the west side of the pond; on the east end there should be a fountain. She said there needs to be something to help aerate the water to keep it a Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 6 of 8 DRAFT living system. She said the makeup well is not going to service the pond to the east, there will need to be some sort of aeration in that pond or it will cover with algae. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the pond is a great amenity along there and for that she is willing to sacrifice some of the mound. She said the intention of the mounds was to hide parking lots and there are not any parking lots here, the cars are tucked behind the building. She said she would like the mound on the blank parcel to be constructed at the time this building is constructed. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the Staff Report mentions a relocation of trees to the parcel to the east; why relocate the trees to the east, it is only going to cause a problem when the owners of the parcel build. Ms. Husak said the intent is to provide additional screening to the vehicular use area and accommodate tree replacement. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there are no other trees being relocated. She said it appears the trees are Seagreen Juniper that will be eight feet off the back of the curb, she said that is a great screening hedge. She said it needs to be held far enough off the curb that it can mature without growing over the curb lines. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she is not in favor of a second sign on the property, if it were to sell; the new owner will need to come back with a sign package. She said she would like to see the buildings look as harmonious as possible and would like to see the stucco continue. Ms. Amorose Groomes said in terms of the delivery truck turn around, she does not agree with how the truck drivers are expected to turn around in a parking lot full of new cars. She said in the long term the delivery issue needs to be solved. Ms. Kramb said she does not understand why the drive aisle that runs parallel to Venture Drive was not extended so they can pull in and straight out. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if the car wash will serve the entire property. Ms. Husak said there is an interior car wash in the existing building. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the stucco issue is outstanding and there is disparity about the mounding. Ms. Kramb asked if there was a way to connect the drive, but put up a gate that can be opened when the delivery truck arrives. Mr. Parrish said the applicant is in support for adding a no loading sign on Venture Drive. Mr. Fishman said he would rather see pond rather than mound. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the Commission would like staff to work with the applicant to pursue a resolution to use stucco. Ms. Husak said it sounds like we can move forward with the Rezoning, the material they are proposing is a Final Development Plan detail. She said the applicant is on a tight timeframe and needs to be reviewed by Council. Mr. Hardt said the resolution of the stucco issue is a technical issue about how the wall is constructed. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 7 of 8 DRAFT Mr. Parrish said the applicant is okay with using stucco Mr. Hale said we would like to keep the sign in the pond and would like it to be fifteen feet. He said we would like to come back as an Amended Final Development Plan to add another sign. Mr. Parrish said we would like to increase the sign to fifteen feet. Mr. Zimmerman said fifteen feet of sign is way too much in a pond. Mr. Parrish said along SR 161 for the duration of the pond there is a three -foot safety barrier will be installed which covers part of the sign. Ms. Amorose Groomes said there is support for a ten -foot sign. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that the first motion is with respect to the Rezoning with the Preliminary Development Plan and there are three revised conditions. Motion and Vote — Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Mr. Taylor made a motion to recommend approval to City Council of this rezoning with preliminary development plan because this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria, provides the opportunity for the retention of a successful business within the city, and includes a cohesive campus development, with three conditions: 1) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; 2) That the text be revised to permit only one dealership identification sign to serve the entire site; and 3) That the text be revised to require interior signs to be located a minimum of three feet away from any windows or exterior walls. Mr. Parrish agreed to the conditions. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Budde, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) Ms. Amorose Groomes said that the second motion is with respect to the Final Development Plan and there are nine revised conditions there were seven in the Planning Report and they have been amended. Mr. Parrish agreed to the conditions. Motion and Vote — Final Development Plan Mr. Taylor made a motion, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, to approve the Final Development Plan because this proposal complies with the proposed development text and criteria and existing development in the area with nine conditions: 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 12, 2012 — Minutes Page 8 of 8 DRAFT 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; 5) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; 7) That the exterior building finish materials be revised to match what is used in Subarea A; 8) That a fountain and aerator be incorporated into the eastern portion of the decorative pond and an aerator be incorporated into the east stormwater management pond to provide sufficient aeration; and 9) That the applicant work with Planning to field- verify the installation of the proposed junipers along the north side of the decorative pond The vote was as follows: Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Budde, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) City of Dublin City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Land Use and pi a n n i n g Report Long Range Pt .,ing C.0 S� 5Flie�-Ri'isc @uui "`n c '"'` 3016 -1236 Thursday, January 12, 2012 Phnom Inn: M4- 410AWI Fox: 6 "10.4747 Web 6iW:w .WUFldl.V& MAG Planned District Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3 -1 Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Case Summary Agenda Item 1 Case Number 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Site Location Venture Drive On the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with Perimeter Drive Proposal Incorporating approximately 8.73 acres to the Midwestern Auto Group Planned Unit Development District to expand the automobile dealership campus with a 45,000 - square -foot building addition for the BMW and Mini franchises. The site is located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 750 feet south of the intersection with Perimeter Drive. Requests 1) Review and recommendation to City Council under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 for a rezoning with preliminary development Wan 2) Review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Owner /Applicant Tim Galli, Car MAG Park LLC and Brentlinger Real Estate Co. LLC. Representative Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale LLC. Case Manager Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II (614) 410 -4675 1 chusak @dublin.oh.us Planning Recommendation It is Planning's analysis the proposal complies with all applicable review criteria and the existing and anticipated development standards. Planning recommends: 1) Approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan with 3 conditions. 2) Approval of the final development plan with 7 conditions. Conditions Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 1) That the development text be revised to require property perimeter screening from US 33/ SR 161 as required by the Zoning Code; 2) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; and, 3) That only one dealership identification sign be permitted to serve the entire site. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 2 of 18 Conditions Final Development Plan 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; 5) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; and 7) That the plans be revised to show adherence to the Code - required property perimeter screening along US 33 /SR 161six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet. cN of Dublin l Planning and Zoning Ommlzzlon Wad If r9ZIMPIMPI Midwestern Bubo Group BMW &Mini Palm Ha G,nber Planned Di l¢, subarea D and sf MoPa amedDlml¢ Thursday,]anuary 12 2012 1 Page of 18 City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 4 of 18 F ac t s Site Area 1 24.33 acres Zoning i PUD, Planned Unit Development District (existing MAG plan and Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) Surrounding Zoning North: PCD, office condominiums in Subarea D of Perimeter Center East: PCD, vacant land in Subarea D of Perimeter Center South: US 33 /SR 161 West: PCD, the Crown auto campus in Subarea I of Perimeter Center Site Features • 2 vacant parcels and 1 developed parcel (existing MAG campus) • Frontage: 1,400 feet along US33 /SR 161 1,550 feet along Venture Drive 700 feet along Perimeter Drive • The developed parcel includes two buildings. An approximately 115,500 - square -foot dealership building with several automotive franchises including, such brands as Saab, Aston Martin, Bentley, Audi, Porsche, and Volkswagen and the recently added Volvo is in the southwestern portion of the site. This building also includes the MAG offices, the automobile service area and an executive suite. The second building houses the Land Rover franchise in a 7,335- square -foot building to the north, facing Perimeter Drive. • Customer and employee parking for 404 vehicles and 59,590 square feet of vehicle display area are provided along all sides of the buildings. Vehicle display areas are designed in a unique finger -like arrangement along the western and southern portions of the site. • A retention pond is on the north side of the main building at the Perimeter Loop Road entrance. Mature landscaping and significant mounding are along the site perimeter and provide screening for the loading and vehicular use areas. • The vacant parcels have no significant topography. Trees along the US33 /SR 161 frontage were removed earlier this year. A portion of the vacant site is temporarily being used for stormwater management from the Volvo expansion. Case Background The Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District was originally approved in 1988, encompassing land between Avery- Muirfield Drive and Emerald Parkway, divided into subareas A through M. Permitted uses included commercial, industrial, residential, and office. Subarea J -1 of Perimeter Center was established in 2008 to accommodate the temporary relocation of parking for the construction of a building expansion for the MAG campus. In 2010, City Council approved a rezoning with preliminary development plan that removed Subarea J and portions of Subareas D and J -1 from the Perimeter Center PCD and established a new 15.6 -acre MAG PUD. The Planning and Zoning Commission simultaneously approved a final development plan with the recently City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 5 of 18 Community Plan At the time of the Volvo application, the applicant also introduced the concept of a relocated BMW and Mini facility from Post Road to the parcel located to the east of the existing MAG campus. constructed 46,000- square -foot Volvo addition. 11 Futu r e Land Use The developed portion of the site is designated as General Commercial on the Future Land Use Map, while the vacant portion is designated as Standard Office, which includes sites with frontage along major collectors. While the proposal does not strictly adhere to Future Land Use designation, the proposal is an expansion of the existing MAG campus, which includes the dealership headquarters, automotive sales and service uses. Additionally, the permitted uses within the proposed development text include office and retail uses, which would provide the opportunity for future redevelopment that more closely meets the Future Land Use. Update October 6, 2011 PZC Meeting Plan Modifications The Commission informally reviewed this proposal and agreed the proposed expansion of the MAG campus for BMW and Mini was appropriate, but any remaining land along US 33/ SR 161 to the east should not be considered for car dealerships. While the Commission complimented the applicant on the proposed architecture, they also suggested eliminating the bright colored accents from the elevations. The Commission supported the proposed site design and requested that wall signs adhere to the 15 -foot height limit and that loading areas be J high. Some Commission members wanted to see a continuation the d ecreased screening from the highway as is in place for the existing dealership. The applicant has made revisions to the proposal that include: • A slight decrease in the size of the building • Orienting both showrooms are oriented toward the US33 /SR161 frontage • Indicating approximately 4,000 square feet of service area to be added in the future • Eliminated one Venture Drive curb cut • Revised the height of wall signs to a 15 -foot maximum • Added a concrete wall along southern boundary of the pond • Removed car display along the pond • Shows AutoTURN truck delivery route • Provided a three -foot mound along the US33 1SR161 frontage for the dealership • Provided a six -foot mound along the US33 /SR161 frontage for the vacant parcel to the east City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 6 of 18 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Plan Overview Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation for the development requirements noted; the Zoning Code covers all other requirements. The development text typically addresses permitted and conditional uses, setbacks, parking, landscaping, signs and architecture, among other subjects. For administrative purposes, Planning has requested the applicant combine the BMW and Mini site with the existing MAG campus to create a single MAG Planned Unit Development District, thereby removing a portion of Subarea D and all of Subarea J -1 from Perimeter Center. The proposal will create two subareas (A & B), one for the existing MAG campus and one for the new BMW and Mini site. Subarea A is the existing campus and no changes are proposed to that portion of the development text or the site. Development Text This development text establishes a new Planned Unit Development District with development regulations that are applicable only to these 24.4 acres. It also removes approximately 8.7 acres from the Perimeter Center Districts eliminating Subarea J -1 in its entirety and removing 2.88 -acres from Subarea D. Use The list of uses is identical for both Subareas and permits the sales and services of new and used automobiles. The applicant is also proposing to permit office and research uses, similar to what is currently permitted in Subarea D of Perimeter Center. The proposed text continues to permit a number of ancillary uses within the primary structure, which includes automobile service, sales of automobile parts and accessories, non - retail coffee shop, and automobile rental services. The proposed rezoning will permit a non - retail car wash, which will be approved with the final development plan application. Density /Lot Coverage The proposed development text does not specify density so the maximum building site will be determined by parking, setbacks and lot coverage. Code permits up to 70% lot coverage. Setbacks The pavement and building setbacks text for Subarea B are consistent with the requirements for Subarea A and are as follows: Road /Boundary Setbacks (ft.) Pavement Buildin Venture Drive 25 75 SR161 /US33 60 60 Eastern Boundary 25 25 Architecture The proposed development text requires "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture." The proposed building addition is intended to create a visual focal point and complement the existing building massing and high - quality architectural design. Permitted building materials include glass, metal, EIFS, stone /stone veneer and concrete masonry units. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 7 of 18 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Parking The text requires parking at one space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, 3 spaces for each service bay, which is consistent with the requirement within Subarea A. The Code requires one space for every 100 square feet or 3 spaces per service bay whichever is greater, which results in a far greater number of required spaces. The text permits the lesser of the two requirements, which is consistent with recent approvals for car dealerships. Landscaping Site landscaping is required to meet Code, except as noted. Code requires a six - foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161. During the original zoning for the existing MAG campus, the applicant was granted relief from this requirement. Planning has advised the applicant that with this rezoning the property perimeter screening requirement must be met with the development of BMW and Mini site. At the October 6, 2011 informal review of this proposal, Commissioners suggested the applicant continue the same treatment (no screening) along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage for this portion of the site to provide continuity. The proposed text for Subarea B requires a three -foot mound and one tree per 30 lineal feet of frontage along US 33 /SR 161, which is half the height of what Code requires. Along the eastern boundary of the site, the Code required six -foot mound and one tree per 30 feet is proposed within the development text. Planning cannot support this proposal for screening at only a three -foot height considering previous concerns expressed by members of City Council regarding screening of automobile uses along the highway. The Zoning Code requires one deciduous tree per 40 feet along a vehicular use area with a 3 1 /2 -foot wall, hedge or mound to screen vehicular use areas. The proposed development text requires one deciduous tree per 80 feet of frontage with large evergreen trees in between along the Venture Drive frontage, consistent with treatment existing in Subarea A. Tree Preservation Last year, the applicant removed trees along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage that resulted in the need to replace 331 caliper inches. The consolidated stormwater pond will require the removal of additional trees. The applicant is proposing in the text to allow a portion of the replacement trees (limited to 33 %) to be evergreen and ornamental species to increase tree species diversity on the site. Planning supports this proposal considering the amount of tree replacement inches JI required. The plans also show off -site replacement on the adjacent vacant parcel to the east, which must be specifically permitted in the development text as Code require tree replacement to take pla on -site. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 8 of 18 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Signs The development text for Subarea A has unique sign requirements that identify special sign needs for this campus with the multiple vehicle franchises. The proposed development text follows similar sign requirements for Subarea B, but also exempts logos from any color limitations on all types of signs. The proposed text permits five different types of signs for the MAG campus: campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs. Specific requirements for each sign type are as follows: • Campus Identification: One ground campus identification sign is permitted in the development text at the Venture Drive curb cut. This sign may be up to 15 feet high and 30 inches wide with up to 6 sign panels for vehicle brands. Logos are permitted to be displayed and may exceed Code required size limitations. • Dealership Identification: One ground dealership identification sign facing US 33/ SR 161 is permitted, in addition to the existing signs located farther west along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage. Planning recommends only one ground sign be permitted along US 33 /SR 161 to identify the entire MAG campus. The dealership identification sign may be up to 10 feet tall and 50 square feet. • Directional: These signs are permitted throughout the site and provide wayfinding to the various sales and services areas internal to the site. The text permits directional ground signs at a maximum height of 55 inches and a maximum width of 42 inches. • Wall: Two wall signs are permitted along the building fagade, one each for BMW and Mini. Individual brand wall signs not limited in Subarea A to the Land Rover building. Wall signs cannot exceed 15 feet in height and 50 square feet. • Brand: These signs are permitted between the front fagade of the building and the parking lot to identify a single brand. Maximum height is 40 inches and maximum area is 5 square feet. Lighting The proposed text requires that all lighting across the site is the same and limits the height of poles to 28 feet and requires similar types of fixtures throughout the site. The poles are taller than Code permits to match the existing poles. Lighting levels are lower than what Code allows. Stormwater The proposal includes a "regional" retention basin that would serve several parcels Management on the south side of Venture Drive. Traffic Study The City has approved a traffic analysis s tudy. Analysis Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Process Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning /preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. _JI City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 9 of 18 Analysis 1) Consistency with Dublin Zoning Code Condition 1 2) Conformance with adopted Plans 3) Advancement of general. welfare & orderly development 4) Effects on adjacent uses S) Adequacy of open space for residential. 6) Protection of natural features and resources Condition 2 7) Adequate infrastructure 8) Traffic and pedestrian safety 9) Coordination & integration of building & site relationships Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Criterion met with Condition: The proposed development text modifications address the unique needs of the site, continued from the previously approved text. Planning strongly recommends that Subarea B maintain the Code required screening along US 33 /SR 161. Given the site's history, concerns raised by members of City Council and the length of the frontage along the freeway, the six - foot hig mound sho uld be required. Criterion met: The Future Land Use Plan of the 2007 Community Plan identifies the land use for this site as General Commercial.. This proposal only expands upon uses already permitted for this site. Additionally, the permitted uses within the proposed development text include office and retail uses, which would provide the opportunity for future redevelopment that more closely meets the Future Land Use. Criterion met: The preliminary development plan encourages development as a cohesive, high - quality automobile sales campus. Criterion met: The proposed development fits well within the existing development pattern of this area. Planning has advised the applicant that any further pursuit of development for automobile dealerships along US33 /SR161 could not be supported to transition this use with surrounding office uses. Not applicable. Criterion met with condition: The proposal includes the replacement of previously removed trees. The text should address the replacement of trees off - site. Criterion met: All required public infrastructure is in place. Criterion met: The applicant provided traffic analysis, which accounts for the square footage of the proposed building at build -out. Criterion met: The proposal provides for a coordinated and integrated automobile dealership campus with consistent architectural and landscaping details. 10) Development Criterion met with condition: The proposed use meets lot coverage layout and requirements, has adequate parking and circulation. The layout is cohesive in intensity relation to the existing dealership. The text should be revised to only permit one dealership identification sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage. Condition 3 City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 10 of 18 Analysis 11) Stormwater management 12) Community benefit Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Criterion met: A regional retention approach meets the Code requirements. Criterion met: The consolidated campus proposal facilitates the retention of a successful business and its workforce within the city. The proposal provides for a modern and striking automobile dealership campus. 13) Design and Criterion met: The proposed appearance quality materials consistent wid other developments in the area. development. 14) Development phasing ZS) Adequacy of public services development plan encourages the use of high the previously approved development text and The proposed site design encourages a cohesive Criterion met: The development is proposed to be constructed in a single phase. Criterion met: There are adequate services for the proposed uses. 16) Infrastructure Criterion met: No public infrastructure contributions are required contributions I Recommendation Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Approval Based on Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria, provides the opportunity for the retention of a successful business within the city and includes a cohesive campus development. Approval is recommended with three conditions. Conditions 1) That the development text be revised to require property perimeter screening from US 33/ SR 161 as required by the Zoning Code; 2) That the development text be revised to permit tree replacement off -site on the adjacent parcel to the east; and, 3) That only one dealership identification sign be permitted to serve the entire site. Details Final Development Plan Proposal The proposed improvements include: • 40,900- square -foot building, with 3,830- square -foot service addition • Service function with an attached carwash located to rear • Parking concentrated in eastern portion of the site • Decorative pond along US 33 /SR 161 • Mounding and landscaping along US 33 /SR 161 frontage • Stormwater pond located along eastern property line, mainly offske • Campus sign package City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 11 of 18 FDeta i Is Development Details Access and Circulation Parking Final Development Plan A 40,900- square -foot building, with a future 3,830- square -foot service addition is proposed in the central portion of the vacant site and was redesigned to orient both showrooms toward US 33 /SR 161. In front of each showroom is a plaza area for car display. The service function is located toward the rear of the building toward the Venture Drive frontage with an attached carwash, which is not intended for public use. Required setbacks, building height and parking are consistent with the requirements within the proposed development text and the development within Subarea A. The applicant is proposing one driveway off Venture Drive at the west end of the site, which aligns with an existing drive across the street. The plans show a continuation of the "finger" display design from Subarea A. An interior circulation drive provides access from the main entry off Perimeter Drive in front of the dealership buildings east to the new intersection of Venture Drive. As in Subarea A, the drive separates the customer and employee parking from the vehicle display areas. Parking for customers and employees is concentrated in the eastern portion of the site. The proposed final development plan meets the development text requirements for parking at one space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and 3 spaces for each service bay. J The proposed building elevations continue a modern design as established in Subarea A. The materials are consistent with those used in Subarea A and meet the requirements specified in the proposed development text. Both buildings include showrooms with large portions of glass and will be 26 feet high. Each showroom indicates vehicle display on the second story. The building elevations include metal accent bands with bright colors of green, red, and yellow in limited areas. Based on concerns raised by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the October 6, 2011 meeting stating the proposed color accents are out of character for the campus, Planning recommends these accents i colors be eliminated. The applicant removed 331 inches of trees along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage and 30 additional inches for the construction of the consolidated stormwater pond. The plans indicate the replacement of all removed inches throughout the site and along the stormwater pond located on the parcel to the east. The plans show that trees recently planted along the eastern boundary of Subarea A for screening purposes will be relocated along Venture Drive. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 12 of 18 FDetails Additional Landscape Requirements Signs Final Development Plan The text requires compliance with the Code's landscaping requirements which are met, with the exception of vehicular use area screening along Venture Drive and property perimeter buffering requirements. The plans indicate extensive landscaping and screening along the customer and employee parking areas and the service areas of the site. The applicant has indicated that the intent is for this parking area to not be visible from any part of the site. Section drawings have been included with this submittal to indicate the height of screening along the vehicular use areas from the freeway. As proposed in the text, the plans show a 3foot mound and one tree per 30 lineal feet of frontage along US 33 /SR 161, which is half the height of what Code requires. Along the eastern boundary of the site, the Code required 6 -foot mound and one tree per 30 feet is shown. As stated previously, Planning cannot support this proposal for screening at only a 3 -foot height considering previous concerns expressed by members of City Council. Code requires a 6 -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161, which should be incorporated into the landscape plan. Code allows 25% of a site's street frontage used for car display to be screened with only a one -foot hedge. The applicant is proposing this reduced screening at the eastern Venture Drive access point. The text permits deciduous trees for vehicular use area screening at one tree per every 80 feet along Venture Drive. Approximately 300 feet of Venture Drive has been previously planted with evergreen trees. This area is now proposed as vehicular use area and the required deciduous trees should be incorporated. Code requires additional landscape areas equal to 2% of the building ground coverage. The applicant is providing the required 818 square feet of landscape area with foundation plantings along the rear of the building and pods of landscaping along the front and west elevation. The five types of signs for the MAG campus (campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs) are permitted within the development text and are consistent with the requirements within Subarea A. Three sign types are proposed for Subarea B as follows: o Campus IdentIfIcation Sign. One campus identification sign is proposed at the Venture Drive entrance and includes individual brand identification, which matches the two existing signs located at the site entrances for Subarea A. The proposed text permits a maximum sign height of 15 feet. The proposed sign is indicated at 15 feet 4 inches, which will need to be revised to meet the development text. o Dealership Identification Siqns. The proposed development text permits a ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage to identify the MAG dealership for Subarea B, which would be in addition to the ground sign permitted in Subarea A. The proposed plans indicate the 50- square -foot dealership sign within the dec pond along the highway frontage. P lannin City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 13 of 18 Details Final Development Plan recommends the applicant be permitted one ground sign for both Subareas A and B along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage. Wall Signs. The text accounts for two wall signs; one for BMW and one for Mini. The proposed BMW sign is located along the south elevation and the proposed Mini wall sign is located on the east elevation. Both signs meet the requirements within the proposed development text for size, colors, height and area. The applicant is also proposing to include incidental directional signs along the entrance walls to the service areas for BMW and Mini. The copy identifying the service component and the arrow would be permitted; however, the BMW and Mini copy is not permitted and must be eliminated. Lighting ][ heproposed plans meet the lighting requirements and proposed fixtures are onsistent with the approved light fixtures for Subarea A. Pedestrian Access — The applicant is showing the removal of the current accessible path to Venture Drive within Subarea A with the improvement for Subarea B. The pedestrian access to the public way does not need to be replaced as the existing building has a path to Perimeter Loop Road. However, the Mini /BMW building is required to have an accessible path from the accessible entrance to the public right -of- L way and will need to provide this path as part of the building permit application. stormwater regional stormwater pond is located along eastern property line, mainly offsite, Management which is intended to manage stormwater for the proposed improvements and the remaining vacant site to the east. The applicant has submitted preliminary stormwater management calculations for the proposal. Utilities Existing water and sanitary sewer services are used for the construction of the proposed building. _Analysis Process Final Development Plan Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a final development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1) Consistency with the Criterion met with condition: This proposal is consistent with the preliminary requirements of the proposed development text and preliminary development developmentp /an, plan. Planning recommends the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors located on the building elevations. Condition 1 City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 14 of 18 Analysis Final Development Plan 2) Tiaffcand Criterion met with condition: The applicant will pedestiiansafety accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the building permitting. Condition 2 be required to provide an public way at the time of 3) Adequate public? Criterion met: The site has adequate public services. No open space dedication services and open is required. _ space 4) Protection of natural features and resources Criterion met: The i the development text. tree replacement in 5)Adequacyof Criterion met: The proposed lighting plan meets the requirements and the lighting I proposed fixtures are of a consistent design with Subarea A. 6) Signs consistent Criterion met with conditions: The proposed campus identification sign has with preliminary to be revised to meet the 15 -foot height limit as specified within the development developmentplan text. Planning also recommends the applicant be permitted only one ground sign for both Subareas A and B along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage. The use of the Conditions 3 -5 BMW and Mini names on the entrance walls leading to the service areas for BMW and Mini should be elimina 7) Appropriate landscaping to enhance, buffer, & soften the building and site. Conditions 6 -7 8) Compliant 9) stormwater management Criterion met with conditions: Deciduous trees should be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive currently planted with only evergreens. Planning cannot support the plans to screen at only a three -foot height considering previous concerns expressed by members of City Council and the requirements of the Zoning Code. The Code requires a six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirement along US 33 /SR 161, which should be incorporated into the landscape plan. Criterion met: Stormwater management for the site is accommodated in the stormwater management plan and will be finalized at the building permit stage. All phases comply Not applicable. with the previous criteria. 10) Recommendation Compliance with Criterion met: The proposal complies with all other known applicable local, other laws & state, and federal laws and regulations. regulations. Final Development Plan Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the proposed development text and preliminary development plan, the final development plan criteria and existing development in the area. Planning recommends approval of this request with seven conditions. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 15 of 18 [Recommendation Conditions Final Development Plan 1) That the plans be revised to eliminate the accent colors proposed on the building elevations; 2) That the applicant provide an accessible path from the BMW /Mini building to the public way and the plans be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That the proposed campus identification sign be revised to meet the 15 -foot height requirement specified within the development text; 4) That the applicant eliminate either the existing or the proposed dealership identification ground sign along the US 33 /SR 161 frontage; 5) That the brand names (BMW and Mini) proposed on the entrance walls leading to the service areas should be eliminated from the proposal; 6) That deciduous trees be incorporated every 80 feet into the 300 -foot stretch of proposed vehicular use area along Venture Drive; and 7) That the plans be revised to show adherence to the Code - required property perimeter screening along US 33 /SR 161six -foot wall, planting, mound, hedge or combination thereof plus one tree for every 30 feet. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 16 of 18 REZONING/ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two - thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. In the case of a combined rezoning /preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning /preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 17 of 18 accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the Planned Unit Development process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process consists of up to three stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The intent of the final development plan is to show conformance with and provide a detailed refinement of the total aspects of the approved preliminary development plan (rezoning). The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The Commission may approve as submitted, approve with modifications agreed to by the applicant, or disapprove and terminate the process. If the application is disapproved, the applicant may respond to Planning and Zoning Commission's concerns and resubmit the plan. This action will be considered a new application for review in all respects, including payment of the application fee. Appeal of any action taken by the Commission shall be to the Court of Common Pleas in the appropriate jurisdiction. Following approval by the Commission, the applicant may proceed with the building permit process. In the event that updated citywide standards are applicable, all subsequently approved final development plans shall comply with the updated standards if the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the updated standards would not cause undue hardship. Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(8) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in §153.053(E)(4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 049Z /PDP /FDPI Midwestern Auto Group - BMW & Mini Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3-1 MAG Planned District Thursday, January 12, 2012 1 Page 18 of 18 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10) The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Existing Conditions E I NA � 6 PERI 9F TFR OR Ilk It 1 a F J ! )FRO Proposed Subarea Map IN -.. A LIk'' ', ' ,1 .�e,.,vt. 1 I • 1 I A N Ll: l a _ {L - Proposed Rendered Elevations 2. West Elevation 3. North Elevation (Venture Drive) 4. East Elevation 3 2 4 1 �KEYP._L4N W 1. South Elevation (U.S. 33) Finished MAG Site Elevation (South View from U.S. 33) Proposed Landscape Plai I N . . . . . ..... . ....... . ...... . ........ ....... V Proposed Site Plan Venture Drive a s3� • 1 4 r •.. �, -- 1— _ire— — �, �. _ __ _ _ U.S. Highway 33 _ i I S{� 1 y \ 1 5 Proposed Sign Plan LO 2 !- 6 A �X I ■ 17 4" 2. MAG Mini Wall Sign 1'- 5'' C MINI 7- !,,, rica • I J 3. Mini Service Wall Sign ! SIDE 1. Campus Identification Sign 5. Dealer Identification Sign 2i -9» Roam - 1'- 5" C BMW <-SE RVICE 4. BMW Service Wall Sign 2y- 6 Oil hOAU nD Aw 20 1 - 6 31 5. MAG BMW Wall Sign - ti 1. Summary FID EYACIORI Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. i I I I I 11� Eflwmmm��[[M= i i I , � IT- �� (5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or service'uses including, without limitation: 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Developrnent Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Ceoter PUD, Su barea s 0 and Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini vawmtar i #-,nn Drt P, CZP')tz Vanh irp rwiva a remises consumption (1v) Automobile rental serviow (6) One executive suite providing a single residential. suite and related offi space for the automobile dealership. I (7) Detached non-retail car wash operated in association with automobile sales and/or service facilities, provided that it shall be used only by employees of the dealership in conjunction with sales and/or services to customers. This car wash also shall be permitted to serve an automobile dealership located on the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD should such development occur. (A) Venture Drive: The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right-of-way shall be f_'5 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) Perimeter Drive: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right-of-way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 65 feet for buildings. IrOMI'MM (D) Perimeter Loop Road: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right-of-way shal I be 25 fed for pavement and 75 fed for buildings. (E) Interior Property Lines: There shall be no minimum setback requirements from interior property lines within this PUD. (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this site shall be calculated as Mows: 1 3 M CU , =' Mmjanzw space per I 1 11 1 ng noot - 77A ror saie Uses, per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. A single parking space shall be required to serve the executive suite. (2) Parking for uses other than what is accounted for in Section V(A)(1) of this text shall be provided in accordance with the City • Dublin Code, - I , W #1 1 of olfijn -MoN M I Eyl FI 111 RM • (C) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 161 /U.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights-of-way. For purposes • this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. (E) Car Wash Star-king: There shall be no minimum automobile star-king requirern for V1. Architecture ROM NT�- IA " Landscaping: All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscal Code unless otherwiseMecified herein. "B) Property Perimeter Screening: Along U.S. Route 33/State Route 16 1, the site shall be required to provide an average of one tree per 40 feet of lineal frontage to meet the intent of the arterial screening requirement and shall be exempt from the 6-foot tall continuous screening requirement, as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. KPIGIsks'Jus amplolvau (E) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. (G) Mechanicals: All roof-mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights-of-way adjacent to the site. 11-049Z/PDPIFDP 4 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Pe6meter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3-1 MidweStern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini r'nc t — FA I a- QWJ=11 (B) Alteration of Signs: Sign panels on the campus identification, directional and bran signs that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be changed without further review by the Planning and Zoning Commission provided that verification of th new ionel's confon with this text is made thmueh the sign, rmo c=e s s , Ir otherwise specified herein. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all kher permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For , urv,osesof this text si shall be , ,olaced into one of five cate for which seyara 9tandards are set forth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (2) Dealership identification signs (3) Directional signs (4) Brand signs (5) Wall signs (2) Interior Signs: Signs located on the interior of buildings shall be permitted provided that they are not more than 3 feet in height and are not readily visible from rights-of-way that are adjacent to the site. 5 11-049Z/PDPIFDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Finat Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3-1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini ATIq PAhrmotpr 1 nnn Rd A 1 ;8) 1 S Venture Drive FEU 9 if 01, 0103 111 111 1111 1 ��;11 EMIIII , A) Prohibited sips and displays: The following types of signs and displays shall k be prohibited outside of buildings: (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions # # (E) Campus Identification Signs: The fbllowing standards shall apply to campuas identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identes the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. I � I �� I I I I I 1 11 11 IIIaII (3) Location One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the site entrances into the PUD from Perimeter Loop Road and another shall be permitted to the southeast of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Ven Drive. I (4) Overall Size: Each campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sip shalt be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on-site. 6 11-0497-IPDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and )-I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAC 8MW & MIN r1le. Pprimptpr Loon R& & 5825 Venture Dave tal 0 � N MU IM (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. 173 (F) Dealership Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "dealership identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 161/U.S Route 33 and/or a wall sign located at the building's main office entrance that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealership that is operating within the PUD. (2) Number: A maximum of two dealership identification sign shall • permitted. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 16 1 /TJS Route 33 frontage and one wall shall be permitted at the entrance to building's main office. (4) Overall Height. The ground sign shall be a maximum of 46 inches in height and a maximum of 32 inches in width. The wall sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height, as measured from grade. (5) Content. The dealership identification sign shall identify the name of the automobile dealership. No logos or identification of an automobile manufacturer shall be permitted. (6) Sign Area; The maximum area of the sign face for the ground sign shall be 17 square feet. The maximum area ♦ the wall sign shall be 21 square feet. Any modifications to the location of the dealership identification ground sign greater than 10 feet from the existing location or the movement of the wall sign to a location visible from an adjacent right-of-way shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final a Q, ta mea MEMMOM= � (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign used for the purpose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site, Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right-of-way. 8 �411= (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sie' shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fac-ade of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the building. ,'2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planin g and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (a) Sign Type A (such as signs labeled K, L, N and 0) Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. (b) Sign Type B (such as sign labeled M): If multiple brands are identified at the same entrance, the overall sign may exceed 20 square feet in area, but each individual brand sign shall be limited to 6 square feet in area. The overall height shall not exceed 40 inches. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and/or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted arm of the sign face. Un 5 i awmj (5) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be pen to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. 111111�111111111 IM1111 0 6 11 •: i 1 1TM • (2) Number & Location: One wall sign shall be permitted in this PUD, located on the north fagade of the northernmost building in this PUD. Tbis sign shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. lip! (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permittei on the wall sign. i KM 9 In ,1 B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development Ill, r0an, lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin City Code. (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 404 watt lamps. (F) Cut-off type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. No color light.- zhall be permitted to illuminate the exterior of a building. TWO "Elow-Mar-MM-11 IMMOM Approved Development Text Perimeter Center 1. If these standards conflict in any way with the City ♦ Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Commerce District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code apph cable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commerce District. F- The standards included herein shall not require modification of any structures, landscaping, or other improvements actually in place as a result of development occuning prior to this rezoning. Such structures, landscaping and improvements shall be considered permitted and legal and conforming uses at the location and to the size and degree they exist at the time of said rezoning. The landscape buffer along the south side of Post Road shall be installed in its entirety from Avery Road to Wilcox Road with the beginning of construction on Subarea G, H, F or the construction of Perimeter Drive from Avery to Wilcox. With regard to the mound and landscaping required ♦ the property along Post Road and owned • applicant Olde Poste Properties, the following schedule should apply- # and the proposed loop street nor construction on the 15-acre parcel owned by White Consolidated Industries shal I be included within the said 100,000 square feet. 0 91 =7 : € t = � �� a. All signs with a base shall have the base constructed of the predominant material of the user building. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/PfefiminM Development Plan/Final r kevelopment, Plan �Terimeter Center PUD, Subareas 1) and Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini AXIr Ppriawler Lmn Rd. & 5825 Ventu(e Drive flommm lm��� � of . # «r # U a- Maximum area of sign face: 50 square feet per face, with a limit of no more than two faces per sign. b. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. c. Maximum overall height: 8"1 above top of adjacent street curb. Signs located on earthen mounds shall maintain conformance to 8'-0" maximum height above top of adjacent curb. d. It is intended that the signs shall be generally rectangular in design with an approximately Tto 5"height to length ratio. Specific designs for each usermay be considered on their own merit as long as they fbllow these general guidelines. (See Exhibit A through E attached). 2119TFWIJ�z lk = IIIIIIIiii I Rill I IN lI III I I :11 c. Street numbers shall be located in the lower comer of the sign face or base nearest the right-of-wIy. IIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIII 11 Jill ilill 11111111111111111111 1111111��� e. Quantity: No more than one ground sign shall be permitted on any one lot or multiple lots if devoted to one specific use or user, except tha� for buildings or uses having frontage on each of two public rights-of-way, two ground signs are permitted. Neither ground sign shall, by itself, exceed the maximum allowable area of 50 square feet for each face. 0 31= 1) 10'-0" along Avery Road 2) 0" along the south side of Perimeter Drive 3) 8�4' in all other areas. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP kezoniling/PrefirnirliM Development Plan/Final Development Plan Peril Center PUD, Subareas D and )-I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mint Approved Development Text Perimeter Center i. Within Subarea B, all signage shall be limited to the south side of all structures alonito Post Road. j. No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall Or fence. No wall murals shall be allowed. k. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. J 119 Wfft=�M n. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site or "for sald' or "for lease" signs in accordance with Dub] in Code 1189.03 (g). 071=1 41 ff V 7; Z I t. All types of parldng, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or waR- mounted cutoff fixture and shall be from the same type and style. 3. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood, dark brown, black or bronze metal. 1 * U 11 �TTIII MINE 1. j — g along PV Dal) I e Rmilui II1111 evel OT illumination. 11-049Z/PIDP/FDP Rezonlog/Prellminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3- 1 Midwestern Auto Group Poo MAG BMW & Mini M TIM TIMartle b In - rM I a im Permitted Uses: 11111mv,1111011111in III I - ie, 9 ijli�I�Jl M W. "I-IN, ms- I EMGVTW�# --�- KIMM"WO FRXIM".."BOTORIMUM ONMRAM-T. IT-31EM" 5. All other publicly dedicated local streets sha-11 have a 25' pavement setback and 5 0 building setback. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area, However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3 -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG 8MW & Mini alIC 4 n 0,1 9, WK VAnhirA r)nvp Appr 0 V =FAFTR 0 p M enrym Perimeter Center 0= �=I 1. Sizes, ratio, and type of par and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. w = = r: M � Anor-rT I IN �11111;I to Z ill 1111111 1 10 1 4 i 1 1 11 1 1 1 FairliII 1, All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened ftom view by a solid wall or fence. 1. • materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment Or Other utility hardware on roof, ground, • buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. F'. In addition and within the required building setback, a 3'- 4' earthen landscaped mound shall be provided along Perimeter Drive with street trees planted 50' on center and located +Pfrom R.O.W. line with R.O.W. 3. Along S.R. 16 1, a 6'landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted a minimum of I tree per 30'0.F.T.O. (trees may • grouped). li-4. 49Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/1'snat Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J- I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini NOR I B31 0 = - �MM W IMMT��� , MI MI. [no i i A I i ii� IM 11111 11!,11 WMIN g MC T OTWUL IWIIL:J' lhi prL)j!*SW4I III 31TI -- r - MeG unai ue+rIWrnenT piullutia is on file with the city. The intent is to integrate the parking tot into the redesigned site so as to provide a seamless transition across the properties. I ip�111 We al, W. 10 F4 r I MI. I Iwo W W I SPIN "111 11. MI =4 100- "IFIVy MO M-M-117; MTI F,]Ijr , MIFFIR Tlgiiiii�ippyiuiil 6. A stand-alone parking lot for employee parking and/or vehicle storage serving an automobile dealership located in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD or a successor zoning district that is applicable to the same property ("Stand Alone Parking Lot") shall be allowed as a conditional use, provided that it is approved in accordance with Section 153,23•. ## 1. Stand Alone Parking Lot Development Standards. A Stand Alone Parking Lot (as defined above) shall be limited to a maximum of 191 spaces. The Stand Alone Parking Lot shall be used for the purposes of employee parking and/or vehicle storage and shall not be used for the sale of automobiles. a. The minimum setback along Venture Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement and buildings. b. The minimum setback from the southern boundary of this PUD shall be 30 feet for all pavement areas and buildings. c. Side yards along the western boundary of this subarea shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings. If this subarea is used solely as a parking lot to serve the automobile dealership fbund in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD then there shall be no minimum setback for pavement between that subarea and this Subarea J-1. d. There shall be a minimum side yard of 10 feet along the eastern boundary of this subarea. e. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% • total lot area. Ifthm subarea is used solely as a parking lot, then theTe shall be a maximum lot coverag requirement of 6S%. I 4. Waste and Refuse. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and Hly screened from view by a solid wall or fence. 6 # ; - I of - 1 4 1 1 44 4 of t- I I Lwj 0161 tsw�l a Irks MI 4 w 0) $11 il iiiiiiiii d rgot 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Pezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plao Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and I- I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BM & Mini A11c; OariMatar I ^^rN Ott P, C;AIC Varit)ra rIn— A - A.pproved Development Tex) Perimeter Center For uses other than automobile dealerships the development standards shall be those contained in Subarea D ♦ the Perimeter Center PUD as they exist ♦ the date this rezoning is approved. I� . D �► I S a« � MMM 1, 1• � rr r �r Unless otherwise set forth in the su bmitte d drawings o r development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this .. I11-:10110M WIXIMU-03 ,1 5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or *lervice uses including, without limitation: (i) Automobile service (but not including auto body work) (ii) Retail Wes of automobile parts and accessories (iii) Non-rl coffee shops selling beverages and snack food items for on-premises consumption (iv) Automobile rental services (6) One executive suite providing a single residential suite and related office epace for the automobile dealership. (7) Detached non-retail car wash operated in association with automobile jsale and/or service facilities, provided that it shall be used only by employees of th dealership in conjunction with sales and/or services to customers. This car w (A) Venture Drivei The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right-of-way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) Perimeter Drive: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive night-of-way shall be 25 feet fbr pavement and 65 feet fbr buildings. # (D) Perimeter Loop Road: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive riglit-of-way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP 2 Rezoning /Preliminary Developirnent Plan/Final Development Plan Pen alieter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3.1 Midwestl Auto Group PUD MAG 8MW & Mini it Porill 1 nnn 0,4 % wir (E) Interior Property Lines: There shall be no minimum setback requirements fiom interior property lines within this PUD, (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this sil" shall be calculated as follows: I (1) Parking for automobile dealership uses shall provide parking at the rate of I space per 300 square feet of building floor area for sales and related office uses, per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display am, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. A single parking space shall be required to serve the executive suite. BEDE= MI 11 Asim (4 gis r , 1 4 #,T 11 MOMM. H M6 "04 r*1 MOO (C) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 161/U.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights-of-way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. MM (E) Car Wash Stacking: There shall be no minimum automobile stacking requirement for the non-retail car wash. V1. Architecture 11-049Z/PDP/FDP 3 Rezovingl/Reliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and I I Midwestern Auto Group KJO MAG BMW & Mini A"11r, 0—i—ZtO, I �� 0A 0. COIC A i 1: IN IN 11 (D) Permitted Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, EIFS, stone/stone veneer and concrete masonry units (CMU). ';1310lu jUV;-S1Up,-;; winbill MCI I110MOT DIIII Uri 11M roois ME ar, no 71516YE to Lne public. (A) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscal Code unless otherwise specified herein. I (B) Property Perimeter Screening: Along U.S. Route 33/State Route 161, the site shall be required to provide an average of one tree per 40 feet of lineal frontage to meet the intent of the arterial screening requirement and shall be exempt from the 6-foot tall continuous screening requirement; as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. 11-049Z/PDP1FDP 4 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter center PUD, Subareas D and 3 MidweStem Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini CTIC O&I-imprpr I Wn R& & 5825 Venture Drive I al 1111 W1113 ffiffign�� liII I Ostia tv-sat #4 - 1 6 il (G) Mechanicals: Alt roof-mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights-of-way adjacent to the site. MU= (13) Alteration ♦ Signs: Sign panels ♦ the campus identification, directional and brand signs that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be changed without further review by the Planning and Zoning Commission provided that verification of the new panel's conformance with this text is made through the sign permitting process, or as otherwise specified herein. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code, For ex� standards are set fbrth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (3) Directional signs (4) Brand signs (5) Wall signs 11-0492/PDPIFDP Rezoning/Preliminary DevelOPMent Pla(i/Flrlal oevelopment, Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 1) and I I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MACS BMW & Mini ATIr. Darimptpr I rionn PH A ;R7q Venture Orive (D) Standards Applicable to All Sign Types: The following standards shall apply to all -qigns in the PUD regardless of how they are categorized: s 5 (1) Materials: All sips shall consist of materials that are complimentary to and of a similar quality as the buildings found in this PUD. (2) Interior Signs: Signs located on the interior of buildings shallbe permitted provided that they are not more than 3 feet in height and are not readily visible from rights-of-way that are adjacent to the site. (3) Illumination: All signs fbund on the outside of bungs shall be externally illuminated, except for campus identcation signs, which may be internally illuminated. (4) Prohibited signs and displays: The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings (a) l3alloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions (C) Logos and/or signs located on the interior of a building that is easily readable from an adjacent public right-of-way shall not be permitted without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission (E) Campus Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zo-ning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. I �� 11�11 giipii� g 6 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas Dand ) Midwestern Auto Group PUO MAG BMW & Mint (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the site entrances into the PUD from Perimeter Loop Road and another shall be permitted to the southeast of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Venture Drive. (4) Overall Size: Each campus identification sigri shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on-site. (6) Sign Area: Sign panels identifying automobile manufacturers shalt be no greater than 1.5 square feet in area. The portion of the sign identifying the name of the automobile dealership shall not exceed 5.5 square feet in area- (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (F) Dealership Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "dealership identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 16 YU. S. Route 3 3 and/or a wall sign located at the building's main office entrance that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealership that is operating within the PUD. iffliffill I I I � 1 (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 16 I/US Route 33 frontage and one wall shall be permitted at the entrance to building's main office. (4) Overall Height: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 46 inches in heia and a maximum of 32 inches in width, The wall sign shall be a maximuni 15 feet in height, as measured from grade. (5) Content: The dealership identification sign shall identify the name of the automobile dealership. No logos or identification of an automobile 11-0492/PDP/FDP 7 Rezoning/Prehail Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 1-1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini ill oarlom- ® I — D'i A COIL 0 14M M (6) Sign Area: The maximum area of the sign face for the ground sign shall be 17 square feet. The maximwn area of the wall sign shall be 21 square feet. (7) Any modifications to the location of the dealership identification ground sign greater than 10 feet from the existing location or the movement of the wall sign to a location visible from an adjacent right-of-way shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign - used for the purpose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs, (2) Ucation: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right-of-way. (3) Size: Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inchav in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square fee S lei I lllfft M-4 InTimi MINI (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign�' shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fa�ade of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufactur whose products are being sold in the building. I (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. 1 ggrtmmi - (a) Sign Type A (such as sips labeled K, L, N and 0): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. 11-0492 /PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary DeveloiNnent Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and a -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini (; Oprimat— 1 — (b) Sign Type B (such as sign labeled M): If multiple brands are identified at the same entrance, the overall sign may exceed 20 square feet in area, but each individual brand sign shall be limited to 6 square feet in area. The overall height shall not exceed 40 inches. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and/or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the sign fare. (5) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to contain three colors, not inctuding black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. RMEW"VIUMMAIMMEMR& 1 30MCB= 0 , 4 0 (2) Number & Location: One wall sign shalt be permitted in this PUD, located on the north facade of the northernmost building in this PUD. This sign shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitt on the wall sign. i LX. Lighiting IgtigMIJ-44111101 I -'W' I V I I K 4 V10j I I to.) M et if ma. it ", R Lf N 1 0 MO a 4 it (C) Ligbt fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 400 watt lamps. 9 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary DevelOPment Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and ) Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini ,villZ trarematar I nnn Pri 9 qR2s Venture Onve -6111.1 I'm IliMIN'tatell I I III I Ail 11T. I OR 111;11 1.13111liliflult; I, I A 111MITIO MTNTIOT. I. Summary = Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, thi:; development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. VIVITIMMIT-MMI I U WO all of 13 13 OLIVA a MITIMIMI rr 1. '1: ## # (5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sates or service uses includin& without limitation: s (v) Automobile service (but not including auto body work) (vi) Retail gales of automobile parts and accessories (vIi) Non-retail, coffee shops gelling beverages and snack food items for on-premises; consumption (viii) Automobile rental services with such a facility) � !9I (A) Venture Drive: The minimum setback ftom the Venture Drive right-of-way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings- (C) Eastern Boundgy: There shall be a minimum. building and pavement setback of 2S feet as measured from the eastern boundary line. (D) Interior PrDperty Lines: There shall be no minimum setback requirements from interior property lines within this PIJD. (A) Number of Parking S on this site . -paces; The number of required parking spaces shall be calculated as follows: (B) Autorngbile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 16 IIU.S. Route 33 and shall be screened fi-om the view of other, public rights-of-way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for Wes display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. lffudgz (A) Building Hgj� The maximum height for all structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. 2 (D) Permitted M t rials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, Lp cast in place concrete, EIFS/stucco, stone/stone veneer and concrete masonry units MIHIMIMMMMEM#�- �MMGEHMMO-= (A) Landscal2in - All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscatf! Code unless otherwise specified herein. I (D) Eastern Perimeter Buffer: The 6-foot tall mound with trees every 30 feet will be extended easterly on the adjacent property and then continued down to the Children's Hospital property line. (E) Venture Drive Vehicular Use Area Screenin : One deciduous tree shall be required every 80 feet with large evergreen trees planted in between along the Venture Drive frontage to meet vehicular use area screening requirements. (F) Waste and Refase: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. a =--- 11 1 a - 1 11 1 111. - - • �,Ogdvtlw I I (gagresud I W. I I# a � -1 low! #Fjolsjym FARM, to "H) Mechanicals: All roof-mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened frorri the view of all rights-of-way adjacent to the site. QU= (B) Alteration of Sims: Sign panel modifications that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be reviewed and approved administratively provided that the new panels conform to this text. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For purposes of this text, signs shall be placed into one of five categories, for which separate standards are set forth below. 'These categories are. (2) Dealer identification sign (3) Directional siSins (4) Wall signs (5) Brand signs (2) jat�or Logos and/or signs located on the interior of a building shall be permitted without requiring approval if the signage is not internally illuminated. ralfflr�t ,,4) Prohibited signs and diQlas: The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings: (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual wtractiois (E) Campus Identification Siggs- The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold ftorn that dealership. (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the Venture Drive right of way. (4) Overall Size: The campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in heipht and a maximum of 30 inches in width. - '5) Pands: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels on each side for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on-site. �t I � I# 9URS1 Usluvirits I UPI, I I RIP - 4 (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (8) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to utilize three colors. If vehicle or brand logos are incorporated into the sign panel, they shall be exempted from color limitations. (F) Dealer Identification SiM. The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (3) Dgfiiiii ion. For purposes of this zoning text, aDealer identification sign" Lt shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 16 IIU.S Route 3 3 that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealerships that operates within the PUD. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 1611US Route 33 frontage in Subarea B. (4) Overall Size: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 10 feet in height and a maximum of 50 square feet in size. a 11 N 6.0 Is 111 P!I 11 1 (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign used for the purpose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right-of-way. , "3) aja� Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inches in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square feet (1) DQfigition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "wall sign" shall be defined to have the same meaning as provided in the Dublin Zoning Code. (2) Number Locatim; Two wall signs shall be permitted in this PUD. These signs shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. 11 /PDP/FDP 16 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Mri/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, SLdmreas D and J -1 Midwestern AuO Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini AVA Oarem4t& I - (5) Logos; The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitted on the wall sign. Logos shall be excepted from color restrictions. ' 011F. ��* Oil! 1 11 1! (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fa*e of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the buildin& (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand Wes entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (a) Sign Type A (such as signs labeled K, L, N and 0): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand, (4) Content Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and/or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the sign face. (5) Colors: Bach individual sign panel shall be permitted to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. IBM= (B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development plan, lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin City Code. (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 4 watt lamps. I (D) Lighting poles and fixtures shall be consistent in color and appearance througho the site. I - 0 INJIblismils • . I I ., I 1 7 CITY OF DUBLIN- eaia ur WW tmw Rona. n-Ma 5800 Sh1er4MM Rood Dub6N Ohio 43DI64 M6 Phone/ MD: 614- 410-4WD Fox 61441¢4747 web $do; www.dulaffmoii,vi PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF DISCUSSION OCTOBER 6, 2011 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Perimeter Center Planned District, Subareas D and 3 -1 MAG BMW & Mini Venture Drive 11 -049Z /PDP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: To Incorporate an additional 8.7 acres Into the Mldwestern Auto Group dealership campus to be developed with an approximately 46,310 - square -foot automobile dealership for BMW and Mini as part of an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group campus. The site Is located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 750 feet south of the Intersection with Perimeter Drive, Request: Informal review and feedback of a future rezoning with preliminary development plan and final development plan application. Applicant: MAG, Tim Gall]; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner R. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak@dublin.oh.us RESULT: The Commisslon informally reviewed a proposal to Incorporate an additional 8.7 acres Into the Midwestern Auto Group dealership campus to be developed with an approximately 46,000 - square -foot automobile dealership for BMW and Mini as part of an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group campus. The site Is located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 750 feet south of the Intersection with Perimeter Drive, The Commissioners agreed that the proposed expansion of the MAG campus was appropriate, but that any remaining land along US 33 should not be consider for car dealerships. While the Commission complemented the applicant on the proposed architecture, they also suggested eliminating the bright colored accents from the elevations. The Commission was supportive of the proposed site design, requested that wall signs adhere to the 15 -foot height limit and suggested that loading areas be highlighted when the case comes back. A majority of the Commission wanted to see a continuation of the decreased screening from the highway as Is In place for the existing dealership. STAFF CERTIFICATION Gaudla D. Husak, AICP Planner II 11 -0492 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mint 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive NI October 6, 2011 — Mimftl Page 2 • I 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Prelirni nary Development Plan/Final levetopment Plan X - efimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and J -I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini ,Q35 Perimeter L,•- OCtotW 6, 2011 — Moubes Page 3 of 6 l ► � M III � � � li i im OdDber :, 2011 � �IIII ft utes g 1.. i asked i was w t i 4p'. i ^ i as r i ' ,As. Husak ♦ in 998 t hey origin " f ,..., .. board with t he M AG deve 11 ili; lip I ��Iiilrs;ljj I i! M i 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 ■ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of _Dubftt? CStyCdwdl—1 _ Meeting - _- 6AVtON IC�I�IwN__�M�_R71M N0_IOCY__ Held 5 des! or this project, which is re ursed for those costs, as February 22, 2010 Page 10 20 more than 95 percent 09KWete, Dublin will be red in the agreement )31aff recommends appre Ice Mayor Salay asked y the City of Cokumbus requested this chang a. Mr. Hammersmith res dad that he believes on their meeting, the mtws Legal staff now has more adty to take on this , reviously, they did not a that capacity. Mrs. Baring d about the maximum L The memo ind7tfor 650,000, but the redlined rmn��hyrespondecl dir�tes $350,000. Mr, Ha that ,000 was the original a e design an a share the acqulsttlon casts. number has not Chang owexpecfa now the actual cost Wl exceed $350,000. Boring inquired H It wou a possible to ensure tine a acquisi with e van month tirrreframe I ted. Mr. Hammersrntth res ad that the driving force ' be the Ohio P Commission Grant, the fact that the grant res that construcrated In March 2011. The CJty of mbus has made a co ent to comple te thon within seven months; afore, a Urneframe of the end of the year" has bated for completion of uisition. Mr. Ke referred to paragraph of page one of staffs m , which indicates: 'As a result is change in direction a Clty of Columbus, se l sections of the Ag req ' d modftieaUon to remo ny and alt references to fin feadfng all property uisition for this project` ublin led the property tuition in the original co d and en went to court in an ent domain action, wou is be Dublin's case to le7 Ms. Readier respo at Dublin was going to and would therefore ha een reimbursed. Mr. Keenan inqu whether, in this case, respedNe party would sponsibie for eminent domai coons rgsuiting from takes within its own j 'diction Ms. Readier nftrmed that is Correct. Mr. Keen sked if each party wou ave the night to initiate a " Ick take' and proceed with the oject. / Ms. dier responded af[Irma y. f �9, Chinrdcl- Zuercher statVlhat the dates are conical. he Ohio Public Works mission grant may help ensure roject stays on schadul he assumes that Dublin Columbus will have ar mee 1MIl a the status of land acqu ors in their respective jucisdict' . Mr. Hammersmf ponded th lar meetings, which be an incerrttve to stay'on task." on olu 1 Amenes; Mr. K yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms id- Zuercher, yes; Vice Mr. Ge yes; Mayor Lecklider, SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 07 -10 Rezoning Approximately 15M Acres Located on the Southeast Comer of the Intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road within Perimeter Center from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Subarea J -1) to PUB, Planned Unit Development District (MAG, Midwestern Auto Group, Volvo Expansion - Case 09- 108ZiPDP) Ms. Husak reviewed the major points of the application, which will provide Improvements to the site for a substantial building addition to MAG ( Midwestem Auto Group) to accommodate the Volvo expansion. The building expansion wdl be 46,000 square feet To the north of the building expansion will be a carwash exterior to the site. With this expansion, an "end piece" will be added to the campus, firtishing off the building with the same archlFectural materials and elements as that of the existng building. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on January 21, 2010 with eight conditions. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J -t Midwestern Auto Group PUD KAG BMW & Knl 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 582S Venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS inukgs_of- _- - Dublin- City_Coundi. Meeting February 22, 2010 Page 11 Held - -- — —20 At the first reading, Council raised questions about the landscaping. MAG is well -known for Its vehicle displays arranged within finger -like pavement areas, As the memo indicates, the City's landscape Inspector completed an inspection when this application was fled In November 2009. The development as it exists meets the originally approved plan from the late 1990s with the display areas being landscaped up to one foot, as permitted by Code. The only exception that was made as per the approved development plan Is the extent or length of the display area, which is 40 percent of the site. Dublin's Code permits 25 percent display on a site. This 40 percent was included in the original development plan approved in the late 1990s. ll Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 07 -10 at this tine. The applicant Is present to respond to questions. Mayor LedcBder stated that the updated staff report includes an additional condttlan recommended, based upon Council's comments at the Last meeting. The additional condition mentioned is that the applicant restripe the display areas in accordance with the approved site plan and display vehicles only in designated spaces_ Ms. Husak responded that staff believed thls was an issue when they made a site visit, but the condition should not have been Included. The Issue resulted from the snow cover of the lot on the dale of the site visit. Further investigation has confirmed that vehicles are parked and displayed appropriately, Air. Gerber clarified for the record that this additional condition was not in response to any comments of Council. Council discussed landscaping Issues, not parking issues, at the last meeting. Ms. Chinnici- Zuer(;her stated that there was extensive discussion about whether the City's expectations for the original landscaping of the display areas had been met At the last meeting, there was disagreement between staff and Council about that issue. Staff indicates that the applicant had met the minimum requirement, but Counclrs issue is that was not the Intent with the original approval. Mrs. Boring argues that the text demonstrates that there was an expectation that was different than the landscaping that has been provided. Mrs. Boring noted that Is reflected on page 7 of the April 10, 1997 minutes, in the architeil's comments. "The parking lot at its lowest point is at a 911400t elevation. The fingers have landscaping to break up large masses of parking, and they are elevated toward the highest points at the tips., three foot landscaping will screen most of the cars.' The intent was clearly reflected in the minutes. Ms. Husak responded that what the landscape plan depicted Is also shown on the current plan. Staff asked the applicant to twice a thorough inventory of the landscaping that exists on the site and reflect that on this site plan, It Is depicted on "Overall Landscape Plan - sheet. OP -1." Mrs. Boring stated that this page reflects the aa landscape as it exists. Ms. Fhmk responded that is, however, exactly as it was In the 1997 landscape plan. At the very Up of it Is the car display landscaping, which is allowed to be one -foot in heighL When that curves around, It meets with shrubbery of 3-1/2 feet In height that would be required for the vehicular use area saeening. It is only the tip of each of the rounded `finger" display areas that has the relief of one -foot In height plant material. Mrs. Boring inquired if twee -foot plant material currently exists on the sides; it has not previously. Ms. Husak confirmed that It currently exists on the site. Mr. Reiner stated that at the last meeting, staff Indicated that the applicant had met the landscape specifications. Ms, Husak responded that they have done so, and that is reflected In their development text, as wail. Mr. Reiner responded that it is then a moot issue. Ms. Husak responded that staffs assumption is that what was discussed in the meeting in 1997 reflected the speaker's assumption. The speaker's assumption was different than what was In their plan, which was approved at that time. What exists on the site today does meet their plan requirements. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Pian Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and )- t Midwestern Auto Group PUO MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter L000 Rd & 5825 Venture Orive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minsrses9f_ Dubhn.City --Co.undl Meeting February 22, 2010 Page 12 Held Mrs. Boring referred to page a of the 1997 minutes, In the discussion about 25 percent road frontage, which the City requires for all car dealers. She cannot find that portion of the text in the Perimeter Center development text that Is crossed out- Ms. Husak responded that is the issue with the way the text was written and the reason staff asked the applicant not to continue with that text. The text was written to state, "landscaping to Code, unless otherwise approved by the Final Development Plan." This landscaping and the relief on the landscaping, 40 percent of their frontage, is something that was in their Plan. but not tteelr text Mrs. Boring stated that she has been told many times previously that the text overrides the Plan. Ms. Husak stated that the 1997 approved text states 'unless approved on the Plan,' so the text provides for that_ Mrs. Boring Inquired the location of the language concerning the relief In the display areas. Her concern is that other car dealers will now ask for 40 percent, for Instance, along Sawmill Road. How will that appear compared to the Code requirement for 25 percent? Ms. Husak responded that the method for the car dealerships on Sawmill Road to obtain permission to do so Is by securing a variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals, since they are all In a standard zoning district. In part two of the packet, which begins with the Perimeter Center development text, page 64 Is to be deleted from the existing MAG text The top of that page reads, "AII landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code unless a deviation is specifically approved as part of the Final Development Plan.' Mrs. Boring asked if staff is indicating that when road frontage Is used for vehicle display, it Is the same as landscaping plans? Ms. Husak responded affirmatively. Mrs. Boring stated that the text does not mention landscaping. It indicates that 25 percent frontage of the road will be used for automobile display. She does not accept that as a Landscaping plan. Ms. Husak responded that the relief In the Zoning Code for the 25 percent Is In the Landscape Code, and the relief is landscaping. Mrs. Boring stated that she cannot equate this to landscaping. Aaron Vn-de - iA Stxtith & Hall, 37 W. Broad Street representing the applicant, stated that architects John Oney and Brad Perish, and Tim Gatli, MAG, are present to respond to q uestions. Mrs. Boring stated that she would like to clarify her concerns. The development plan is great In terms of the building expansion and add -on. However, the City has had Issues with vehicle dlspiays over many years- Staff Indicates any variance from the Code must be approved by BZA, and that is the concern. When the City grants one car dealership relief, it Is very difficult not to grant anothef car dealership the same opportunity to display his merchandise. It Is a sense of fairness, and if she were serving on BZA, she would be compefled to grant a variance on that basis. Therefore, unless the percentage is revised to 25 percent - the intent of the original plan - she will not be able to support this rezoning. Approving this would have a future negative Impact on the SR 161 /Sawrroll Road corridor. Mayor Leddkier Indicated that Council is prepared to vote at this time, Mr. Gerber raised a pant of order. Is it staff's recommendation to add a ninth condition as outlined In the staff report? Ms. Husak responded that is an error; that language should not have been included in the memo. There are only eight condltions - those appended by the Planning & Zoning Commission, which are recommended to Council for this rezoning. Vote on the Ordinance Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; W. Reiner, yes, Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Chinr1ci-Zuercher, yes; Mrs - Boring, no; Mr. Gerber, yes. / Rning ce 08-10 Approximatety 0, eras Located on the N east Comer of the tion of North Hlg eat and North Street In Historic Dublin fro B, Business Dlstrl to HB, Historic Busin Istria. (Oscar's - Cas -1092) Mayor Leddkier eta t staffs memo indices request to postpone Ms. Re ter stated t Legal staff Is working o issue of valet parkin at the first: read l . Th ey are conti nuing to vXR on a solution with th e ap by Counts' 11- 049X /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and J -1 Midwestern Auto Group Pt1D MAG BMW & Mini ATI5 Pprimptpr I non Pd A SR)S Vpnhirp r)rivp RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin- City_Couricill Meeting 11 - February 8, 2010 - — Page 7 Held 20 so legal costs associated obtaining easement tons_ Are these legal sts part of the City s regu services within the legal ct, or are they in add o that? Ms. Grigsby respon at those costs are a regular services, but have been charged to the i2nrW T1F district that was bushed for the improve ts. The costs were appro atety $9,000. Mayor L er inquired If letters were t to the property owners ehalf of Couacil thanking em for their contributions. Ms. sly responded that letters ere sent to the Property ers. or Lecklider invited ;bl moray, r. Maurer referred to s memo, page two, parag three, fines Ei�to five, ich state "provide funding ority for costs assoctat th the Dubin R r sewer / proifrom ct from orth of Historic Dublin to lairs Avenue." Is xtsting ewer II rning between those two Ints, and could he or a e living along ay to nto the sewer line? by ponded that there is, but s an Interceptor, which rich 14* that the other main sanitary lines. r mense the public hearing. r mot e or csdider, yes; Mrs. Boring, s; Vice Mayor Salay, yes Reiner, yes ; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Innict- Zuercher, yes. V e Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Icl- Zuercher, yes; Mr. G r, yes; Mr. Reiner, eckllder, yes-, Mrs. yes; Vice Mayor Salay, Ordinance 07 -10 Rezoning Approximately 15.69 Acres Located on the Southeast Corner of the Intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road wtthln Perimeter Center from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Subarea J-1) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (MAG, Midwestern Auto Group, Volvo Expansion - Case 09- 1087JPDP). Vice Mayor Salay Introduced the ordinance. Ms. Husak stated that this ordinance is a request for review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan for 15.89 awes from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Untt Development District (Perimeter Center, Subarea J-1) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group Campus) for the purpose of expanding the site to accommodate a building addition and associated site improvements. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request and also a final development plan at the January 21, 2010 meeting. The Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District was originally approved in 1888, encompassing land between Avery- Muirfteld Drive and Emerald Parkway, d[vided into subareas A through M. Permitted uses include commercial, Industrial, residential, and office. A 14-acre Subarea J of the Perimeter Center plan was created In 1998 to allow MAG to develop. This rezoning proposes to include some land on the east side of Perimeter C with Subarea J and create a new PUD for MAG. That PUD would no longer be in the Perimeter Center PUD, but would be Its own free - standing PUD. The area for redevelopment is in the southeast comer of the site. There is a 60,000 plus square foot budding located on the site, which houses many different car franchises and the administrative offices. There is a smaller building to the north, which houses the Land Rover franchise. The display area, customer parking and a retention pond are also on the site. The site Is fully developed with mature landscaping and screening for the loading and vehicular areas. The rezoning proposes to add a building of 48,000 square feet It will Include a four -story expansion, which will continue the design that dlstingubshes the MAG campus - the pods that protrude from the front of the budding. The expansion of MAG's campus Is necessary die to its recent acquisition of the Lirtworth Volvo dealership. The rectangular parcel Includes two buildings with several automotive franchise showrooms, sales offices, service bays, and all the MAG administrative office functions_ It will also include a suite for the MAG owner. The expansion will also include a 2,000 square feet, free- standing carwash just north of the building, adjacent to Venture Drive. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested that the text clarify that the carwash is not intended for public use, and the applicant has 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Pre4iminary Development Plan /Final Deveiopment Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and ) -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini Allq Dorimola. i ^ Or o. comic RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of D u]?[h nal Meeting February 8, 2010 Page 8 Held_- - -- - - 20 — - made that daritication. The development tead and a development plan already exist. Many of the deviations from Code were not included in the development head but were approved as part of the development plan. In working with the applicant throughout this process, staff has requested that they make their development text more consistent with the current practice of listing all site details listed and described within the tend, even though the detals are listed on the final development plan. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning and preliminary plan with the eight conditions as noted on the January 21, 2010 Record of Actions. Conditions #!3 through #8 have already been met by the developer. Ben Hale, Jr,. Smfth & Hale. 37 W, B_rQad $tmet representative for the applicant, Brentlinger Real Estate, noted that the proposed building is very striking, and the architect, John Oney, is present to comment on the ar&ftecture. The original rezoning had a height limit, and this building does not exceed that limit. The development text contains a lengthy description of the signage. It actuaify describes the existing signage package for MAG, wtilch is very tasteful; the new signage will be consistent with the existing. ,�oji ev. ArChtt@¢u _*I Alliance stated that in 1998, Mark Brentlinger took a 'leap of faith' and created the Innovative, award - winning MAG campus. Now, in diffcWt economic times, he is again investing In the continued growth and success of MAG, creating new jobs and Income for the City. This e)gwsion will result In 18 high quality, luxury automotive brands that wfll accommodate a large number of Dublin residents. Ardiitectival Aifance was not the original architect of the MAG campus, who created a design that has stood the test of time. Mr. Brendinger was involved significantly in that design as he has been with the design of this expansion. He required that this design remain loyal to the architecture of the existing building and campus and continue its spirit. This design meets that criteria and provides a new center, a focal point, for the MAG campus as can be seen from the 3D PowerPoint presentation [presentation shown]. Mr. Keenan requested clarification regarding the fourth story of the building. Mr. Hale responded that the fourth story Will actually be one unit -- the owner's suite. Mr_ Keenan inquired Vthat unit is also within the height limitations. Mr, oney responded affrmatively. The height limits are 65 feet. This addition is 47 feet, 10 inches at its highest point_ Ms_ Husak noted that the service area Is actually below grade.' Ms. Chinnid- Zuercher Inqulred if the road is to be moved to the east. W. Hale responded that it would be moved slightly to the east to accommodate the dealership. It will also replace the view of a blank wall with a more Interesting view. Mrs. Boring stated that there has been past controversy regarding the landscaping of the individual "fingers." How will time concerns be addressed with the new plan? lbs. Husak responded that she believes the controversy was whether the landscaping around the 'fingers' was installed and maintained at the height shown on the development plan. Staff inspections confirmed that it was. There will be no changes; the "pods" will be maintained as they are with the existing landscaping. Mrs. Boring responded that she believes the height of the landscaping Is too low. Ms. Husak responded that it may be too low based on the Code requirements, but it meets the approved development plans. Mrs. Chinnici- Zuercher stated that several of the Current Council members were on the Planning & Zoning Commission at the time ft development plan was approved, and what exists on the site now does not appear the way it was described to the Commission. There was an expectation ttrdt It would be further south, closer to SR 33, and elevated more_ The description that the attorney provided Council on the case at that time created an expectation of something very interesting. The landscaping in place may meet the text, but it does not meet the spirit of the what was presented to Council_ Ms. Husak responded that she has heard that comment from others – that it was intended to slope downward much more that it actually does. 11-049Z/ PDP/ FDP Rezoning/Prebrninary Development Plan /Finai Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J- t Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Rini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 582S Venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes 9f Dubll -M- C4lifidl February 8, 2010 Meting Page 9 20 Mrs. Boring stated that the plan proposes an increase of a few trees. A car dealership may be permitted to have a site that is 40 percent non - landscaped, but she would like to see the new landscaping be more compliant with Code. Vice Mayor Salay pointed out that this is a planned district Ms. Huskk responded that it IS_ Nothing has been proposed to change the landscaping for the "fingers.' Mr_ Reiner stated that he met with the architects on this case, and he would tike to compliment them on the integration of the old and the new architecture and the use of high quality materials. He Is certain there are many other communities who would be glad to have a Volvo dealership In the current economic climate. He appreciates Mr. BrentlNer's loyalty to Dublin and his dedslon to move forward at this time with this aggressive program. Mayor Lecklider stated that the 65 -foot height Ilmltation was In the original text Although he doesn't see any height designations in these plans, the statement was made that there is no building over 47 feet, correct? Mr. Hale responded that the highest point Is 47 feet 10 Inches. Mayor Leddidef inquired the height of the existing buildings. Mr. Hale responded tut they are 30 feet In height. Mayor Lecklider stated that the text Indicates that the alteration of sign panels would not require review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Has that become the custom, or is it unique to this particular project? Ms_ Huskk responded that it is not unique. The Code permits administrative approval of sign face changes in a planned unit development district. The design of the sign is not being changed; only the wording or logo on the face of the sign would be changed. Mrs. Boring requested clarification. Is the proposal to take the entire MAG development out of the PUD within which its currently located? Ms. Husk conformed that is the proposal. Mrs. Boring Inquired 4 the entire area will be rezoned. Nis. Huskk responded affirmatively. Mrs. Boring stated that if it is a request for rezoning, It is possible to request different landscaping_ tuts. Huskk confmned that is correct. Mrs_ Boring stated that she litres the building, but believes the landscaping should be enhanced to meet the spirit of what was presented to the City previously. Mayor Lecklfder requested Mr. Hale's response. Mr. Hale responded that they would be glad to discuss this with staff, but he does not believe the area is under - landscaped. In reviewing the entire package, including the signage, NIAG has less signage than a business usually Is permitted to have under the City's Code_ The complete package Is exceptionally tasteful. However, he would be happy to meet with the City's landscaping staff to determine whether additional Landscaping Is needed to improve the site. Mayor Lecklider asked if the proposed text actually memorializes what Is already existing. Mr_ Hale responded that the entire she actually did not need to be rezoned, but only the east side. However, staff preferred to rezone the entire site to bring the text up to date, because the text does not contain all the standards that were approved in the original development plan. All the 'exceptions" that had been notations on the plan are now included in the text For future review purposes, the updated text will clarify the rights and duties. Ms. Chinnicl- Zuercher asked if the other MAG businesses on Post Road would be moved to this area. W. Hale responded that the owner of that business is interested in doing so, as the site In that location limits their service. He believes their lease expires in 2012 This rezoning request will be followed by an additional rezoning request to permit BMW to move to this area. However, at this time, there is no commitment to do so. The desire is to complete the loop in this area to add BMW and the Mini Cooper. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and )- I Midwestem Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Permeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive Minutes_of i aiciu RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City_Councit yle eting - — February 8, 2010 Page 10 -- _ 20 i I Mr. Reiner asked how much additional land the owner has in this area. Mr. Hale responded that he owns an additional 15 acres. However, only seven to eight awes would be needed for the additional rezoning, Some land would remaln to the east, adjacent to the Children's Hospital facility, that would not be included. There will be a second reading /public hearing at the February 22nd Council meeting Ordlin 08.10 R ng ApproArnately 0.6zeetand es Located on the No east Corner of the I rsectlon of North Hlgh North Street w n Historic Dublin from antra{ Business Dlstrt o HB, Historic Buslne istdcL (Oscar's - Case Mr. Gerber introduced ordinance. .- 109Z) Ms Rauch stated th is rezoning is for Oscar' estaurant and parcels at and 84 I North High Street d 20 North Street The arty consists of .67 a nd is currently zoned CB. The posal Is to rezone to H it is located within His c Dublin. She noted the fol cng: The shpftnsists of three separa axed -use buildings with Bred parking lot to the rear the building and patio a deck area located be 2 and 84 N. High ets. 174 in the past year, the a Icant submitted an apps on for site and archi tflcations, and a I was given In November 09 by the Architectural ew rd. . The approved site n, as tnciuded in the pa outlines an approxima 1,000 square foot bul g addition located 2 and 84 N. High Sree well as modifications the site, Including patio i ications for 84 and for . High Street along the Igh frontage. • The AR so approved archite etalls for this, which In s two-story gabled elem on the front and rear a tions. roposed mod'rfications al required muttipie varia which the Board of I� ing Appeals granted in D mber 2009. The Plann' & Zoning Commission evtewed and reoonvne approval to City Council the rezoning application A second agenda item Ight relates to the patio's tlon within the right -of y, requesting approval an encroachment. • Based on Planni analysis, the proposed oryng complies with the Plan and the Community an's future land use des Lion. It meets the Cry's g-term goal of ensuring properties within the H c District are kxuted zoning classlflcat s that are consistent with a development patterns ch as those existing In the D0fricL Plannin m g ff and the Planning & ng Commission reco approval of the razor request. Z or oted that the applicant is t tonight as wets. Lecklider invited Mr ggspuehler, applicant to men{ J uehler. 705 ffman Rowt applicant eyed to respond to any scions. Ms. Chinnici- or asked for clarification a exact location of (he ition. Ms. Rauch not at the addition will be i etween the 72 and 84 N, gh buildings. Currently, a and patio exist in this a. Ms. Chinn' - Zuerrher rated that the tory provided indicates in 1987, when the pr as originally zoned, as a significant variance hied from parking requ ents. Currently, there significant Issues raised business owners in Hist D n about the lack of for their austorners/dien Wiry then was a waiver rking requirements app d by the City in Decem of 2009, considering that e parking Issue is a major biem for business own , including the owners of r's? W. Rauch responded at the BZA granted the ance based on the fad there is a shared parking ag ant for spaces at nea Edge to be used 5 p.m. by customers of rs. Planning's recom ed and the Board agreed t the mix of uses could the parking needs for site. Ms. Chinn ' uercher stated that Cou has heard that both e yees of Oscar's and custom are not Interested In wal the distance from these mote parking spots. 11- 0492 /PDP /FDP Cu there is no valet parki or this restaurant that transport cars to the / Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J- t Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 582S Venture Drive CITY OF DUBLUL Law M ad �-Q OEM" ft";i MW Rood OubRn OW 430161296 Phone/ IM. 6144"I> 0 roc 61 "101747 Web SW vrwWAA&VOKM Crvatfng a Legacy PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 21, 2010 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Perimeter Center PCD, Subareas D, J and J -1— MAG Volvo Expansion W108Z/PDP/FDP 6325 Perimeter Loop Rezoning/PreUmbu ry Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group dealership campus for a building addition and associated site improvements. This site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with a preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner 11. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak@dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend City Council approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued high - quality design of an existing business, and meets the development pattem within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; Page 1 oft 11- 049Z /PDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and ) -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 21,2010 6. Perimeter Center PCD, Subareas D, J and J-1 — MAG Volvo Expansion 09-10SZtPDP/FDP 6325 Perimeter Loop Rezoning(Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminary Development plan was recommcm 'I for approval. M 1 MOTION #2: To approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, preliminary development plan, the applicable review criteria and existing development standards within the area with six conditions: I 0. 1 0 , '� a - , , 4 ■ r+ L d ��#j F, KTOIJ 0 0 F1 In-7 � -8. TLAM M C 7..= Claudia D. Husa1L AIC 11-G49Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and )-I Midwestern Auto Group PUD KAG BMW & Mini A11r, PpAmf., I nrw, O R tZWK IM16MUOTITMO M-51jr—Arl- =11; la=vy 21,2010 - Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 22 It . IV ea. Mr. Zimme n seconded the L"In. The vote was M , Arnorose Groomes l Ms. Kramb, yes; I yes yes, and Mr. Ta yes. (Approved 71 =1 -C January 21, 2010 — M,;�tAng Nfinutes Page 10 of 22 Ms. Husak said the 1998 development text referred a lot of the development details and deviations from Code to the development plan. She said Planning asked the applicant to rewrite the development text to reflect the current standards and Wit,uirements. She said Planning has worked diligently with the applicant to accomplish the task. Ms. Husak said lighting will be the same as it is on the site today with matching fixtures, pole heights and lamps. She said there are some deficiencies in the landscape plan as it was submitted for interior landscaping and additional trees. She said there is an intention of the BMW and Mini fealership, currently located on Post Road, to this area. Ms. Husak explained that two motions will be required for this application, one for the rezoning with the preliminary development plan and one for the final development plan. She said that 19anning has evaluated both proposals using the review criteria and is recommending that the Commission recommend approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan with the following four conditions: MUT17% YANMRT Developroent Plan Perimeter Center PUD , Subareas Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW Mini January 21, 2010 -Mee" Mind Pag I I Of Ms. Husak said that Planning has determined that the proposal meets the Final Development Plan review criteria and recommends approval of that part of the application with the following five conditions: Mr, Oney showed a video animation of the proposed addition and how it relates to the existing building and the overall MAG. campus. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP RezorringlPreliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Pedmeter Center PUD, Sulbareas Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini Jarutary 21, 20 10 — Meeting hefinul Page 12 1 w Amorose Groomes asked if there were any comments from the public concerning this application. There were none, Ms. Kramb said she does not have a problem with the architecture but does have concerns about the development text. She asked if it was mentioned that the references needed to be removed from the Perimeter Center text. Ms. Husak said it is Condition 4 for the preliminary development plan. Ms. Kramb said the Perimeter Center Development has a lot more text about lighting for MAG than the proposed text, She said another concern is the residential area above the business. Ms. Husak said that Planning has received many inquiries from owners wanting suites within their business so they have a place to stay while in Ohio, She said the Code does not address this issue. Ms. Kramb said this is not a little apartment, it is large residential area. Mr. Walter said he is concerned the architecture of the carwash is uninspired and very close to the road. He said there are mixed window treatments which are interesting, but the materials of metal are not repeated. Mr. Oney said it is EEFS and the scoring of the material is on the back of the building, He said they tried to blend it in and add a strong landscaping screen to the street side, as well as add more glass. Mr. Walter asked if there is anything within the text which would preclude changing the material s the existing sign on the expressway side of the building. He said the stone is out ofplace with the rest of the building. Ms. Husak said they could change the material, the text requires it to be a ground sign. Aaron Underhill, Smith and Hale, said the intent is the make sure that if the brands change the panels can be updated to reflect the change without having to come back to the Commission- He said if the language needs to be changed, it will be changed. Ms. Kramb said to change the language needs to reflect brand signs specifically. Ms. Husak said it says sign panels that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs. Ms. Kramb said that the categories of signs should be listed. • • Jwumy 2_, 1: Minutes Page 13 of 22 -AAr. Walter said he is not in support to adding the trees because they might impede the view, the intent is to mirror the rest of the building, but it might end up being the center of the building. He said he would rather not have those trees there. V- MI, He said the height will be 47 feet 10 inches, the allowable in the text is 65 feet. He said they tried to compress everything as much as they could. Mr. Zimmerman said if someone is building a business and wants to reside there they should have the ability to do so. He said the carwash blends with the building and the landscaping is going to cover it up. Mr. Fishman asked if the text states that an apartment will be allowed at this location. W Husak said yes. Mr, Taylor asked what 'happens to the balance of J-1 and D when it is absorbed into the new subarea. Ms. Husak said both stay wn the Perimeter Center. Mr. Taylor asked if J-1 is smaller. Ms. Husak confirmed. January 21, 20 10 - Meeting Minut Page 14 of i W. Hale said BMW needs to be under construction within a year. He said if permission is obtained to move to the Volvo location the landscaping would have to ► removed. He said if BMW has not been started within a year the applicant will put in the landscaping. He said if it must put it In now they w but would like a year. i i i 1 11' 1 ' ## - 6 fell I said the lighting will be in compliance. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked where the loading and unloading would occur. She said the current carwash location is where semis unload cars. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP 'kezoning/Preliminary Oevelopment Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUO, Subareas D and 3- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 411c� 0-6mw�, I r,^n Vanhir.� nrtvg • stays, if the brand does go away the building would be alter� to become more compliant with what is there. Mr. Walter said that would give time to alter the parking, if Land Rover left. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there were any comments, Motion #1 and Vote Mr. T&_�jlor made a motion to recommend aroo.'roval to CiM Council of this Rezonin reliminarVA: Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high-quality design of an existing business, meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: Mr. Walter seconded the vote. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes, NIT. Hardt, yes; rvfs, A-morose Groomes, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes, and Mr, Walter; yes, Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0) Motion #2 and Vote Mr. Taylor made a motion to approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, preliminary development plan, the applicable review criteria and existing development standards within the area with six conditions: Jan=y 21, 20 10 — Meeting, Nfinut pav i 5) That the plan be modified to require that the landscape screening along the eastel property line be installed with the building construction; and 6) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. Mr. Walter seconded the vote. The vote was as follows. Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes, and Mr. Walter; yes; Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 - 0) :A IQ MW Zoning Plan OJI11N.A I. ro WK `a proposed forth, to exclude the tJr-�- 01 ation from ea proposed *&r FIQ off with wood RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS September P, 2008 Page 4 Held 20 O nance 46-08 opting the 2009 -2013 F Year Capital impro P7wofkshops . Ms. Brautfgam stated th documents have bee zed, n the p sessions. The staff rt details the items d during th re were no changes direct y Council during the s. Vote on Mr. Reiner, yes; Keenan, yes; Vice May Boring, yes; Mayor Chtnnl&- , yes; Mr. Gerber, r. Leckllder, yes. Ordin 58438 Rez ng Approximately 0.3 re Located on the S Side of Bridge Street, t outheast Cotner of th r>tafsectlon with Frank] Street from: PUD, ed nit Development Distrl own Center,n to P ,Planned Unit Deveb nt District- (fown Center vised - Case No. Z/FDP) Ms. Brautigam stated Mr. Langworthy can d to any questions on is matter, Mayor Chlnnia- r noted that a staff p tation took piece at the meeting, and Information was ad from the Plannln ff. There were r questions. V rrce: Mr. Lecklkier, s; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. ran, yes; Mayor Chinni rche , yes; Mr, Gerber, s; Vice Mayor Boring, Ordinance 57-08 Rezoning Approximately 2.1 Acres Located on ft South Side of Venture Dr ve, Approxlrnat ely 800 Feet Southwest of the Intersection with Padrneter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Park* ter Center, Subarea J -1 - Case No. 03 -1122) Ms. Braubgam stated that Ms. Husak is present to respond to any further questions from Council regarding this matter. There were no further questions. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mayor CNnNci-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Leddider, yes; Vice Mayor Boring, yes. O 60-08 nding Chapter 132 of a Codlfted Ordinances the -City of Dublin by 1,19 New Section, Making Exception Allowing f e Firing of Blank nftian when Conducted In Junction with a Fune atriotic Event, or Suc Activity as Speclf] y Authorized by the Cl Manager or the t,lty M agar's Designee. tuts. Srautigam that ttds Cale erne nt Is brought to Coup follow-up to a group who a 21 -gun salute art of a patriotic eveW a kxal hotel, Staff felt it was app prtate to place this in the Code and have the CI make the excep on a case- by-case bas an - PAa Innici- Zuerrher, yes; Gerber, yes; Mr. Lerk1 ,yes; Mayor Boring, yes; Mr elner, yes; Mr. Keenan, NTRO ON/FIR R — ORDIN Ordinance 69.08 Amending Se n 10 (Personal Leave), n 11 (Sick Leave), on 12 (Vacation Le e), Section 13 (Paid TI Off for Employees In -Time Permanent Positions) nd Section 15 (lnsu Benefits) of Ordinance o. 73-08 ( -Co ation Plan ") for Non-U on Employees), Mr. 1- ider Introduced the ordin M . Braudgam stated that cll held an Administrat' ommittee of the Whole eating or to the Council meet] of August 18. Proposed angel to the City's leave rogram were discussed In dep r. Harding is present to cuss the ordinance In aced tonight, which would into effect the changes cussed at the Co 9• Mr. Harding sta that as directed by Cou , staff prepared tegisiati fmpiement the changes pro at the Committee of hole meeting on Aug 18. The padW 11 -049Z/ PDP /FDP Inckrdes a p of the areas pro or changes. Some que s arose In regard b Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3 -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 633S Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Ventwe Drive 0 7 CITY OF DUBLIN_ Lana On a d L -a ao-"Wepe�v S M 9404kV Rood Dubin din 4MI6.1236 Phoro/ TOO: 61 44:046M Fme 61" WAY Web She: vr.n+A t*L0hA4 CreehIng a Legacy • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION AUGUST 21, 2008 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J -- MAG — Porsche 6325 Perimeter Coop 08-073AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Proposal: External building modifications and a wall sign for a portion of an existing automobile sales and service establishment located within Subarea J of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District, located on the east side of Perimeter Loop Road, at the intersection with Mercedes Drive Request: Review and approval of amended final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Tim Galli; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale. Planning Contact: Jonathan Papp, Planner. Contact Information (614) 410 -4683, ipapp @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To disapprove this Amended Final Development Plan because this proposal does not comply with the amended final development plan criteria or the existing development standards within the area VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan was disapproved. STAFF CERTIFICATION nathan Papp Planner • 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Re2oning/Prelnrnnary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3.1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter loop Rd. & 5825 venture Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 21, 2008 — Minutes Page 5of19 Motion d Vote Todd tmmerman made the otion to approve thi ended Final Deve me, Plan because th proposal is cons' ent with the s rds and condition approved with oning/preliminary elopment plan and w' the amended final elopment plan criteri et forth in Section l5 50 of the Dublin Zo ' g Code with the folio nQ two conditions: 1) at the trash recept es be moved appro matel y ten feet aw from the benches around the ketball court; and That the plant erial, particularly th ellow Birch, be ree uated for better site conditio y staff. ZrHahnagreed to two conditions as li above. Richard for seconded the mo ' n. The vote was as fo ws: Mr. Freiman, ; Mr. Saneholtz, yes r. Walter, yes; Mr. F' an, yes; Mr. Taylor es; Ms. Amorose G es, yes; and Mr. Zi erman, yes. (Approv 7-0.) 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J — MAG — Porsche 6325 Perimeter Loop 08- 073AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Todd Zimmerman swore in the applicant's representative, Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, City representatives, and all others who wished to speak in regard to this case. Jonathan Papp presented this request for review and approval of an amended final development plan to permit exterior modifications and a wall sign on a portion of the MAG (Midwestern Auto Group) dealership building. He said that the 14 -acre site within Subarea J was created in 1998, • especially for auto dealerships. He said the 7,335- square -foot Land Rover building to the north faces Perimeter Drive and a second, 57,355- square -foot building to the south is oriented toward Perimeter Loop Road and SR 161 /US 33. Mr. Papp said parking is located on all sides of the building. Mr. Papp said the existing main building includes three angled showrooms for the primary vehicle brands sold at MAG. He said each of the dealership pods is designed to match and provide continuity and cohesiveness to this irnnovatively designed building. Mr. Papp said the development text considers "box- like" buildings to be undesirable within the subarea. He said this same plan was informally reviewed by the Commission in July, with the Commission offering feedback about the fagade changes and the additional wall sign. Mr. Papp said the applicant has chosen to proceed with the application with no changes to the proposal. Mr. Papp said the Porsche dealership occupies the northern portion of the main building which has showrooms and sales areas slightly elevated above grade and service level areas that are partially below grade. He said the existing design of the building is unique with the three main showrooms mirroring the layout of the vehicle display pods by extending from the main building facade at angles. He said to accommodate the modifications for Porsche, the northern angled showroom portion would be replaced with a curved wall slightly taller than the remaining walls. Mr. Papp said the Perimeter Center Planned Commercial District development text requires striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture and states that box -like buildings will not be considered as a use of right. He said the MAG building was designed with a cohesive theme of prominent angled showrooms constructed of glass. He said while this proposal includes a slight curve in the proposed design, the Porsche building tends to resemble a box -like structure. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mlnl r71C Donr tzr 1 nnn Pei R CA')S VAnhiro nrIVP Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 21, 2008 — Minutes Page 6 of 19 Mr. Papp said the text permits the four existing signs, one at each of the three entrances to the i site, and one facing US 33. Internally oriented directional signs are also permitted for the site as are vehicle brand identification signs interior to the site. He said the plan proposes a 33- square- foot Porsche red wall sign with the Porsche brand on the building as shown on the illustration. He said no other vehicle brands were approved for wall signs along the main building fagade. Mr. Papp said this proposed amended final development plan does not meet the applicable review criteria. He said this proposal does not conform to the preliminary development plan or development text for the area in regards to offering "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture" or that "a dealership with box -like buildings will not be considered a use of right." This modification interrupts the cohesive architectural style that has been created on the site by significantly altering the very form that makes the design innovative, and "non -box" like. He added that a wall sign in this portion of the site would not be in character with the rest of the building. Mr. Papp said therefore, Planning recommends disapproval of this proposed amended final development text as submitted. Mr. Hale said the Commission's input from the last meeting was communicated to the Porsche dealers, but they asked him to file this application because they wanted a vote taken. Mr. Freimann said he had missed the Work Session and he asked why they went with the box. Mr. Hale said that was what Porsche wanted to do. Mr. Saneholtz confirmed that the manufacturer was prompting this structure. He explained that the same thing had been experience with a Hummer dealership, as well as conversations with BMW over brand image, intemational proclamations of manufacturers from overseas, basically trying to impose their corporate will upon our community. He said in the past, the Commission stood fast that this community was unique in itself, and the fact that we can still govern ourselves locally is treasured. He said this particular application simply does not meet the intent of the local authorities as far as what they envision for this property and he hoped that Porsche would respect that. Mr. Zimmerman and Ms. Amorose Groomes agreed that this proposal had been discussed at the Work Session and nothing had changed. Motion and Vote Mr. Zimmerman made a motion to disapprove this Amended Final Development Plan because it does not meet the Adopted Policies and Plans and the Development Details review criteria and is not consistent with development standards in the area Ms. Amorose Groomes seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Taylor, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Walter, yes, Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Freimann, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Disapproved 7 — 0.) WOR SESSION Mr, immerman explai the Work Sess dures. He adv n purpose and pr ce' ed that all • ments made by t Commission are formal and non- ding, and are in nded only to rovide general gui ce to the applic regarding the appl' ation. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezon ng /Prellminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and ] -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & MIN 6335 Perimeter L000 Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of _ _Dublin City Council _ Mcgting August 18, 2008 Held ere will be a second /ng/publ i c hearing at the ptember 2 Council Page 11 20 /ng. Ordinance 57 -08 Rezoning Approximately 2-1 Acres Located on the South Side of Venture Drive, Approximately 800 Feet Southwest of the Intersection with Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to: PUD, Planned Unit Development Distrtet. (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1 — Case No. 03 -1122) Ms. Salay Introduced the ordinance. W. Husak stated that this proposal is for a free - standing parking lot to serve the exsting Midwestem Auto Group car dealership within Subarea D of the Perimeter Center PCD. PZC reviewed this proposal Informally on June 19 and recommended approval of the proposal at the July 17 meeting. She noted the following: 1. The MAG dealership exists to the west of this site. It Is located in Subarea J of the PCD. The land to the east and south is undeveloped. To the north is the Perimeter Center office district. 2. The applicant is proposing to amend the development text for a portion of Subarea D to create a new subarea to be called Subarea J -1, This subarea would continue to allow the uses approved for Subarea D — Suburban Office and inslitubonal district and Office, Laboratory and Research district — as well as a free- standing parking lot for 191 spaces for parking for employees and vehicle storage for the car deaWship in Subarea J. 3. The applicant Is currently exploring a building expansion for the MAG dealershlp'in Subarea J, and this prompts the need for an additional parking lot 4. The PZC discussion centered around whether or not it was appropriate to require a conditional use to allow for further review of this proposal. The development text I� as proposed does reflect that a conditional use would be required to allow this lot to exist 5. The proposal is for a new subarea within Perimeter Center PCD for 2.21 acres with frontage along Venture Drive. There are two access points which are internal to the existing MAG dealership. There are no access points off of the pubic road. 6. The text as well as the preliminary development plan indicates 191 parking spaces. The text limits this to employee parking and vehicle storage. There is no display or sales of vehicles permitted. Planning's review Indicates that all criteria are met and that the traffic Issues and stormwater management criteria may be met with the condition approved by the PZC. Staff is recommending approval at the second reading/pub4c hearing on September 2, with the one condition as noted in the staff report. Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher asked If MAG owns all of the area in Subarea D. Secondly, regarding the landscaping, It appears from the renderings that the landscaping would meet only the minimum Code requirements. Ms. Husak responded that the preliminary development plan indicates where the pavement will be located; the landscaping will be required to meet Cade and will be reviewed by the Commission at the firms development plan stage. The screening and buffering required would have to be Identified in that plan. Mayor Chinnid- Zuercher stated that this Issue has been a recurring one with all auto dealerships In Dublin, and none have been held accountable to meeting the landscaping code requirements. The dealership along Sawmil is not meeting the Code for Landscaping. Ms. Husak responded that there are some exception for car dealerships when they are selling cars that allows a reduction In these Items. Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher noted that the Cadillac dealership on Sawmill was required as part of an expansion several years ago to build mounds and do landscaping as outlined In the text This has not been dome and they are not being held accountable. The City needs to be oonslstent In holding card dealerships accountable in view of the amount of asphalt on their sites. Ms. Husak responded that staff will pay parlicuiar attention to that 11-049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Pian /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas O and 1- i Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 911 PprirnPYPr I rmin Pri P. SR)S VpnhirP r)nvp RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I i_putes of _ .__ _ D ublin City Council �Vf tiag August 18, 2008 Page 12 Held 20 Vice Mayor Boring noted that the Sawmill Road auto dealership never let the landscaping grove to the height that was committed to. This plan before Council tonight has deficient landscaping at the outset, as shown on the plans. oen Hale, Jr., 37 W. Broad Street stated that the real estate of Subarea J, the location of the existing dealership, Is actually owned by a REIT out of Atlanta. MAG owns the business and leases the buildings from the REff_ Subarea D is owned by a corporation that is a subsidiary of the MAG dealership. Therefore, the MAG dealership or an associated corn any actually owns all of Subarea b, which consists of 15 acres. Vice Mayor Boring noted that an applicant who wants to censhW;t a building has to meet parking requirements_ If the parting requirements do not meet what is required by the building, typically, the applicant is instructed to make the bulkling smaller. If MAG expands their building, this rests in a need for parking In another location? She Is confused with the process. Ms. Husak responded that during the construction of an anticipated expansion, which has not been approved by P8Z, there wflI be a need for vehicle storage for employees. The site does meet Code in tames of parking and wUl continue to do so If the expansion is approved and built Planning understands this as more related to the needs during construction and a potential requfrernent of the franchlsee to have a certain level of Inventory. Mr. Hale clarified that MAG recently purchased the Volvo dealership, currently located In Lhworth_ They want to bring It to this location. A revised final development plan would allow Volvo to corn to this location. Because of the construction that will occur, the site will be disrupted. The owner made it clear to the Planning Commission that if they saw fit, he would be willing to have this be a temporary lot. it was the applicant's attorneys' position that under the current zoning of the property, the applicant could build this lot with a conditional use. There is Language that allows a non - attached, free standing lot in association with a permitted use. Staff did not agree with this position and so the applicant flied a rezoning. The owner has also indicated that if rlecessary, he would make this site work without these additional parking spaces. However, it would require mixing employee parking with guest parking and car display areas. Operationally, this is not desirable. The applicant made it clear to the Commission that they would do this as a temporary lot, but the Commission focused more on having a first -class lot with landscaping, etc, In case It becomes a permanent lot. His associate, Mr. Underhill rewrote the first draft of this ordinance allowing a car dealership on J -1. He had this portfon removed to avoid any misunderstanding. If there is to be any additional car dealership on this part of Subarea D, the applicant must dome back to rezone It What the applicant is asking tonight is to allow this lot to be used for employee parking and some storage of overflow cars. They are pursuing a minimal change to the zoning to allow them to ask the Commission for a conditional use. They will meet all of the landscaping requirements in the Code. There will be a second reading/public hearing on September 2. Oe 58-08 ng the City Manager Enter into an Agreeme Purchase a .033 Acres, I ess, Fee Simple l rest, and a .061 Acres, a or Less, Temporary �l Robert O. and Jane ekhoft, Said Acreage L il outfit of the Intersection Sawmill and Hard Road nd Declaring an cy. Mr. Ledk lider in cad the ordinance, Mr. Smith hat this was drafted as a olution for the last meed nd because it Involved la urchase, It haB been rev' to an ordinance. The pu ase price is the apprais rice, and staff is request mergency action in order proceed with dosing. Mr. enan asked if the City the value of the Improv nts being Installed /ing Lion. s. Grigsby responded will have the total of the project available, right -of -way acquisition d construction costs. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Centel PUD, Subareas D and J• t Midwestern Auto Group PUO MAG BMW & Mini 417 1 non 0A 9, Gp %1—h— r"'M It ii?, 111mill 711 1 7 7 =Few 11 1! 1 111 1 11 F., Perimeter Center, Subarea D — MAG Parking Lot Venture Drive 03-112Z RezoningtPreliminary Development Plan MOTION: To recommend to City Council approval of this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because the proposal is compatible with the development pattern in this area and complies with the preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standardswidiin the area vAth one conditions: I That the applicant provide a stormwater management report for the site that complies with the City's stormwater management and stream protection Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer. ,11 ill 9 � 111 1 1 1 1 1 9 11i'llial 1 1 i Tqlllqgv� 111111111 � � -d RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminmy Development Plan was approved. It will be forwarded to C ity Counci I with a recommendation of approval. # 1 6A oriented along Venture Drive. Mr. Hale also explained that access was internal and that there would be no curb cuts onto Venture Drive. mr. Frei expressed confusion regarding the tenTorary nature of the parking lot. He discussed MAG's intentions to expand northward, and questioned whether or not the dealership would be in need of parking spaces after this construction. 54M 3 LMA R r n F: M* MOW tI4 well F.WWWA611 IN a 062 (Li W I I YA I — M 5 . 3 L 162411 At 11- ff its t U 1 0 6 6'. I k fit 01 t4*1 W I **�; 10 a a 1 4 1 6 1 t a, • W: Mr. Jobn Oney, Amhhectural. Altiance, confirmed that in the end MAG would lose parking sp•cm He said that with the proposed fiAun MAG construction and the temporary lo he site would have 698 spaces, Mr. Oney predicted that this parking not may be sufficient during the business' busiest times. He said that in the long-range sense the applicant would like this lot to be pernumnt Mr. Sancholtz confirmed that this pre Urainary plan did not give the applicant permission construct the lot. Ms. Husak agreed and said that the applicant would need to receive conditional use and final development plan approval from the Commission before the lot could 1ri constructed. �Tf ". 7 - jTM M 11 1 , - . - a 7 1 1 77 7 711 1 1 that the temporary or permanent nature of the lot was not as important at this juncture. W Freimann, said be saw a need for additional parking as opposed to a desire for it, and that the lot should possibly be permanent. Ms, Arnorose Groot ws felt that ft was not environmentally or civically responsible to pave this area and then demolish it in t—W.-fLA-ru. M Wal ter .: f how ' # # t he const wou l as t. Mr. 1 ' rep th at t he cons truction would be a maximum of 18 months. Mr. Hale Jr. ex plain ed # : t he lot was be iiU - #!. firs because wou need i be the before construction on the dealership began. A # #.i • t t IM , i 771 ' # i:# #t ^ ` 1' # #'. �# • #' i 1: i�' ! t# : { ^ i # ; M #',: b i 1 t ha t : {.° r dec needed t o be we aga t he good i i i # communi S he expressed # # : # • .r like t o see the par # * : # const i n 9 permianent fashion ># tha it was bu 1: ' # tl" f irst ##' :. Mr. Walter h... d that the l eading edge o t bus par lot and agreed wit Amorose Groomes said the l ot shou be permanent and eonstruc with architectural integrity and well integrated into the rest ofthe site. It T. #. • :. # # #:: # ' I *-i ;.' il,.:r # 1 I::M t his s ite t p * of • ,'.i #'. u sed . H e sa if th we t case # # #:; be des '.#i e.: c orrect ly now. T a yl or t the current proposa •Y a lik i t cou be nothing ##is # : ;1n: temporary because the remaining frontage in fiont of US 33 would not be large enough for a bu Mr. Halee Jr. said they were attempting to respond to the Commission's concern that the lot was # #, c to US 33. Mr. Taylor said that if BMW/Mini were to move to this site mid the applicant were to request demolition of the parking lot, he would rather this proposal be implemented as opposed to the previous Wa that { i i.; i M' deta would be presented at t fi na l # :i # 1# " is p # M was co rrect. #" ,• !,.^ # I •:: # :^: :' i # #.# i M ': i t '; ' # # `�1 ii # :.. ' # # III ^ ^. # :.... + # ♦. r 1 • :Yii is A. #i - 1t July 17, 2 009 : Mee t i ng M iritles Pa A o :.t. Walter asked how much of # - parki r.+ r # ♦ n to be removed for fistu de ve lop ment. h -..., sa percent would .•'..: ,r.a to be remo Zi mmer m an , ask y this was My percent of the proposed IOL Mr. Oney described parts of the lot which would need to be removed and said it in the best scenario they would keep it all. W. Zi mmerman # that if t lot was go #:. be Y♦ #1 it shou be d one 1.:` yr" in a perma fishion. He asked which layout scenano was better for development. Mr. Oney said that the current plan which oriented the lot east to west along Venture was the best option for fin= building placement. 1 ♦11: # # expressed concern that there were comp interests and as aga the !.. Tayl was intended to be permanent or temporary. He said that if there was potential for this to be a permanent lot� he would like to see the lot done correctly. W. . t he wou lik to r`r.. an attract l ot w trees and screening i n caw noth is bu i n the f uture . assumed t new i ! v!' t # to t ake p a the is would be altered regardless. OEM Mr. Walter said he was not inclined to support a conditional use and be would prefer the text be changed to allow for a permanent parking lot. Ni Langwoi explained that the applicant would need to come back later with p1ans for the lot, and that they were approving the use and not the lot itself @V01 0110 1 1 ;':k #' # !r. ': #.� # .A. # # #. :y 1 -:, # : /p:1 y.::w M +:. MrI i r/. •:'. ::'I + i'x:.:x ; i:tx F3 - - i :1:.: 11 i ';. necessar have i tie #:. use o:i t l ot to a t li m i t and that M `: use cou s b IF! .:: # I :` # 1; . ► ! # :. :..4 x # ?. i ++ a. I t 1 # Be 4 11 pTUTTWUM VII7 74ply Yur 4 4 1 E. i t: 1 if # #41 !y : I 41 r #." : i of 1 :i , i# + 4 Rv # ► :.. # . , ! i #1 -,'; : `: .I :i #:" # I `:: i ! it .'f #'.'# [.i i "; ► I.i [. i I•: i,:': i !4 I4 '� I � ► i ', # ir` : k° t ► #' i :ri f# = 1." 4', 1 # : " # : II. # +4" # i i::: # ": 4 :' #4 - ;.. Fi ::: it 4.; 1•,. ►.` 1 •. #..a i'., y' #:... Wr. Walter quest whether i i ssue s in a r ezoning and # 'y • •. •F iri {:.. s be i n final deve plan. M r. Langworth con that th i ssue cou be :11 .,. "'ti ii #1 e the conditional use or the final development plam M otion and Vot Mr. Zimmerman made the motion to recommend to City Council approval of this I :+!' # # # ' ;'P# " 11: i VIF ' # > i#-' 4. .. # : i because I # i1r! 4',' # Sil i1 : 1 # :# .► i Ii IxE :_ : i #S I.' f: • i'. - # # 11 ' # 1 # 'a I! : # 4 i G": ► 1 i I. ! T hat t app prov i 1 #: mans H." # .:. report fi the that :1 ill# wit the t stormwater management and strem protection C ode , y to appro by the City Engineer. Mr W a l ter seconded the motion and t vote f o llows: Amorose G roomes , ::a; Tayl i y,' #, ♦ and M Zi mmerm an, nl III 11-049Z/PDPIFDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Develop Perimeter Center PUO, Subareas D and J- I Midwestern I�i� � i yy I N 1 Perimeter L Rd : S825 Venture Drive Perkneter Center, Subarea D — MAG Parking Lot Ventare Drive 03-112Z RezoningifPrefiminaq Development Plan I F � M Reqwt: Applicant: Planning Contact: Contact Information: ma'a &OWNI 15 (MINI (Owl Is! M— MW 1 � 4 [A 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Ran/Final Development Plan Overimeter Cente( PUD, Subareas D and 3 — dwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini J=c 19. 2009 — II Page 4 of 3 U U-01 i LO Rm an # r# #f = Mnldl= .)'. - Lo1 1 construction and later on b ecause they intend to add another building which would take out some parking spaces and requffe additional space fbrinventory storage M Igralm-nm ` # # ' #1 - , �al g reserving this lot for inventory and employee parking only. Ms. Husak said Planning has provided two points for discussion. LEach point is italicized below and Cammissioncomments Mow.] CXAWOT�;�I r=*TZ' MIZZ1.0 VIWA 61 111 1411RU"4001 Bel: � 9 , *111 * 40 , 91 t; # ' A .1 Ij Mr. Zimmerman invited those present who wished to discuss this case tD come forward. [No one caA forward.] Ms. Amorose Cm)omes asked how many '# spaces were presently on the MAG site how many spaces will be removed when the prposed construction is complete, John On Architectur Alliance, said there are now 650 parking spaces, and after the construction, will be 200 less. He said they needed alternative parking in place prior to reznoving the exi n spaces. He explained that they will end up with 512 parking spit on the MAG site whel i 'tt Xl1 ( ::��l.r ; s{ IX` l�fXl;XX i•i'.. JA !' W 4 , ; i tXll i i #e 3 Y Y U w . Y... 1' s # } I: } t':. s Y •; i `w.: t' ` # " i / ': Y 1 i Y.I: it I lY t R } }. ;} :.# # : Y A w'Y # } } } } • } r 1 i 1.:w' Y : }.: # M '. t adjacart to said #. tl ' current B dea } ; # } I on Post Road is ina dequate accord to B starklar& and need } move, H e sa that I " # ffik"i, } }}. } // # ::.: : i # M # :1 Y t } },: no t #::' # `. a .'.l r, R tl }# !M i I aske there 4 R 1 th parce has not been # 11 ► :.i w ith the existmg dealership parcel to the wesL Mr. Hale answered that the two parcels had differeat iwne so t can not be ► #t •Ei at th t P ' , ♦ ! ' r ': r • :r I I t o l l # r ":r a FAIMPpIr :,. # • r Ms. Husak p o i nted i t hat #t :t'_ would be ab to combine ;:: conditiona use ;p °..s.ct i Y'. with t he final development t 4 application due t o t he +'t R tim o t he R Y revision is being proposed. She said that the Zoning Code states that all auto-oriented uses� ;:# i :::iii i:: # � #:M # i' i'; ` •;# i • t: ': :ti: i :.:: # :: :. # t:: w; t I,,.., :.::.: be in association with a permitted use, and on this site, there would not be a permitted use. Ms. Husak said that dealerships are not one of the permitted uses in the current zoning for Subarea D in which the parking lot is currently proposed. Mr. Langworthy said that Mr. Saneholtz had identified the rrIevent point — the fiict that this is a WW"" 4 � —ALOR V�r- La O.Ab 41;oyVA -0- 310M. WOR- 41012: fit) kl�l 0: Wfl 4 1 It' I tsic 4 1 j what she saw on the plan ects what his bee; demanded of development along the U.S. 33 Corridor for every other tenant regArding seI screening, and parking behind the building. She said that she felt a stand-along parking lot is not visually acceptable. III MMUM. 17,11 10TWX[M. M M-MIFIM-Wrik"110-1- M-7 lint Mi lr#711 "o-r- MAJ4 i it I sit 0. 1 W-, MM said the parking lot will eventually no longer be needed and the land will be integrated into the overall plan. LN R�A*" WA -:NL r WM needed. W Hale reiterated that BMW's lease wqxires in 201 Mr- Sanehottz confirmed that a duve-ycar limitation on the conditional use may fulfill the business needs. Nd " TW W A M office building were built at that point Ms. Amorose Grootnes pointed out that the temporary paridng lot would not meet the grem principles they say the City is tying to promote, MOO a 4 1 4 11111 , - III Il:Il IIIIIIIIIIr III "T, I'll! I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiii A A 01 mm 11-049ZIPDP/FDP RezoniVPrefirninary Development Pian/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3-1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter L■oo Rd. & %R)r� viantisrp (w- jlllll� Jill i MOTION: To approve this AmeDded Final Development Plan because the proposed addition generally meets the text and PUD requirements, the applicant has worked with staff to address issues related to A and, the proposal will allow for the expansion of a s=esshl business with the addition of high quality architecture and site design, with eight conditions: 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and J -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD Pr I of 2 MAG 8MW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive REC OF AMON JUNE 16,20 6. Amended Final Development Plan Nerimeter-CenterW- )�— Subares D – Millwestern Auto Group (N(AG) – 6355 Perimeter Loop.Road (C ont i nued) C hristopher ii : = i i He r bert , and M Inc. g..i to the i i c ondit i on s. V OTE: # T his m nde d Fi Develo Plan app was a pprov ed. t f r,� -! �• 1.1- 049z1PDP /FDP Rezoning/Prellminary Development Plan /Final Dev elopment Plan Pag 2 of 2 Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3 -i Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Pere ter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive , I lIII 6. Amended r W Development Plan — 04-145MP — Perimeter Center PCD, Subarea D — Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) — 6355,Perimeter Loop Road Mr. Gerber swore in all those who intended to speA on this case. Ms. Adkins presented the case. The site is located north of 33/161 and east of Avery/Muirfield. The site is south of Perimeter Drive, consisting of 14 ==, zoned PCD, as rmrt of the Perimeter Center plan, Subaru J, zoned for an auto dealership. SurroundI zonings are PCD, RI and PLIL 11-049Z/PDP/FDP RezoAing/PrelimirIary Development PlanlFinal Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Suba(eas D and ]-I Midwestm Auto Group PUD mAG BMW & Mini lals.�ker ### '# ! #' r sir# }; :'►# + #; r• #il #r it Minutes 1 }' 16, 2005 Page 11 U976 U97 6 A 43M r..::° :.r f' :iri =tt i # r# # 97 ! r 3V 41. T, +i t# : M r-9 77 acres would not be auto F = .iI t, as a deed restriction. She stated that Council wanted :# ensure that ! # f. 1 #r I *: aaeage : ' ir. all auto dealersihips. She did not have a copy of the deed restrictions. Boring #. EU , wrl Ms. Adkins, and wanted t UTITY for the record, wbat : ► #. the requirernent spoke #: Christopher ChI . Attorney, that this :# ## +I# in the original t.:i # # i is # .:. To his knowledge that # 1:.. # ► " never rl. r :rt. additional deed restrictions on the :.'r MAG does own an additional 10 aaes along State Route 161/U.S. 33. Boring * stated she ". i # know ' I`. = was # # r :r r le conc= about Route : appearing like an. ! ! 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Development Perimeter Center # Subareas D and Midwestern # Group PUD & V�T Tkk 111 M ; LIIIP MIMI M., U .7 5 7, _r r r f I M-11 �r 61-44 �.IMV- :11 III 1111111y1i g ill I III � � I a , 1 *6 1 1 11 75! 11 1 1 1 1 REM 11 = ITS M=-- - - =2 5 - I Mr. Smith stated that the landscape plan was submifted to Council as part: of the text and bu the plants labeled. Nis. Boring replied that it says we would not see all the cars on those fingers, that we would only see the cars at the top of the fingers. Mr. Smith said when you listen to the minutes, I don't know that it's that clear. The p4 maWial war, specifically nATne► and written in and that is the plant material that they hal out there. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and I- t Midwestern Auto Group •UD MAG BMW & Mini 633S —Perimeter Low Rd. & e #'I a Plio A It ................ S 4 a • !45 4 1 -im lull (4, Mr. Smith said the Code does provide requirements if the expansion is more thart 25%, however, the site adheres to the text of the Planned District. Mowed, and we wanted to bring them back into compliance with that plan, and dud has become a Code Enforcment issue, with what was planted. She said it was a problem if it did not meet Co& � :1111 R 111111 �� A=:Iii'�Iii: yirv" TV;'!' I I a at it 4 a least 411 814 -X;a,41�1 K-9111!"01" i Wkwi I 11 I KqUjB1 AlWiVRIAI' I as Ms. Boring asked for clarification about the difference between the Landscaping section of the report and this condition. She wanted to ensure that the requirements of the Code were being met. I WR T-TT IVA* 474 1 =*1 T"M MIMI I F On 1 Fri 51 Ms. Boring asked if that included the upligbfing to comply with the intent of Code and to improve the appearance. 21-049Z/PDPIFDP Rezoniraq/PrelimirI Development Plan/Final � Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and )- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & MiN 116 Ms. Adkins responded yes. With the display lighting, the issue is that it is still visible. That would be pmt of ft Code compliance staff would remedy at a later date, to make =e that tI' lighting is screenecL i Mr. Smith stated that the odating landscape, at the direction of daf� be brought inti compliance with the miginal text ff"M-W- W. Smith stated that the plants ft Council directed them to plant are never going to grow to the desired height. Mr. Smith noted that that is a Code Enforcement matter. It's only in certain area that they are not tall enougL It does match what was directed as part of their text. Ms. Boring asked W Smith what was the problem with leaving the condition in for plant height. re. I-TRTITRI Ms. Jones noted that the report talks about replacing missing trees. She wanted to know where those trees we going to be replaced on the site. 23w #. .. # : ". i t : . 1 # - - # , a , I - - - - I I W. Gerber suggested the lanuguage 'The existing landsMe, at stafrs direction, be bmught info compliance with the original text." We'll just make that Condition 6, IITAOM�! — , 9cir-lIr a "A—, 1 11 presented, and what we thought we were getting. 11-049ZIPDPIFDP , Nezoning/Prelliminary Development Plan/Final levelopment, Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3-1 Aldwestern Auto Group PUD 1 4AG BMW & Mint Mr. Bird restated, "That the existing landscaping be brought into compliance with thi; plam" = I II= Mr. Christopher Cline asked if the Commission would like a complete presentation, P questions only, I r4"'N IRM ra Q SIVIli k 0,1 off' toPit-1#1 0- 2!jt*1V Mr. Cline represented the applicant, with Dick Pryor and Tim Galley, ftom MAG; also, 101 &X and Ed Parish from Architectin Alliance. 150=1=706' - $of 05) The booklets and a powerpoint presentation encompass some specific deta along with overviews of the model., and renderings. 1 1 13 �11 M7 �tl �_rd UT- =777—OrMwit I IT111 I I I I iza 97. W I I I 1 1 IN YAIOO(; (""Illflsk W. Oney responded that the main building second floor elevation is at 12 f6e� end showroom pods that are existing are at 12 felet, which is the main corridor level. When we to the Land Rover building, that showroom elevation is at grs& The only way to this from the main showroom level on the concourse, is at the 12-foot level. It is the ri eight as the existing showrooms. 049Z/PDP/FDP RezoniN/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and ]-I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mirfl i irp Ddw- Ms. Reiss: confirmed that because the showrooms in the existing facility are On the second floor, elevation # f the bridge changes. :4. 93r !:w Ms. Reiss uplied that was fire, and it explained why there's an elevation change, and what - needed ' # t: know. She had one other a ' , i f M for ►: i The .. Report states that 1 applicant is going to sufficiently screen the overhead service doors. However, staff would Aso like to see partially opaque, or dark tinted glaw She believed this should be Ms. Reiss said she felt it should be a condition. The overheaid. doors in the service area either use partially opaque or dark tinted glass to finther screw the interior awfaice uses. Mr. Cline said that when the Land Rover building was done it was the second part of project and the design was largely dictated by Land Rover, ::# i Rover has e:.# acquWfired } Ford Motor Company, which also owns Astin-Martin and Jaguar, and they are in that building into the overall took of the complex. rvIr. Zi mmerm i m s aid he r lik t p l an . It' u nique in the "`_ # - . ":. ► ! of lot 6T tifferwtbrands. It's a beautiful layout, and they've done a really nice job. 11 .. i # Development Developawt Plan Perimeter . ! Subareas D and Midwestern i Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter L 000 "# r Minutes II — June 16, 2005 ftge 17 llmrT 'A ljij kit of 111FI it JI Oki jn m WA 1,1 Mr, Zimmaman stated that each brand would have a space. He stated the internal/elamne setup is nice. I IM l�ll,�illllllllllll :f #r.'... i II "Min 1 1 11111111111 1 11 � 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 11 'Vonin -7,f I - , #'..: #1 aw 6"M -9 , IZ; )AVVJ-,R-AT1T1I MT7. -, 71,10 # 774 = 7 part you do see an awful lot right now. That's in some rtspectg unfigtunate, but over time that"s going to cm itself with these trees w they grow. I would image ffiats the whole intent of the landscaping pukage that's before us. ii or 1 4 to it I V Ms. Boring asked about the replacernent of 23 inches of trees on the site. These trees screen IVIII 2c��! 1z WtL-2. requirement. This may ► a problem ♦ replacing treen with shrubs, Ms. AkUms responded that the Code requires 3-1/3 feet in height of screening. The ori , 21 D o evelpm ent Pla n includ e d the larger tr ees. When t he y are rem o ved, t o comply w ith C they added shrubs. I Mr, Oney added that the replacement trees are located in the interior and are designated on the plan. Ms. Boring noted that the plan is removing parldng places. She thought there are a lot of filled parking places. I assume the applicants and staff are comfortable with the removing of those parking plazes. W. Oney stated that approximately 98 parking; spazes would be removed, but that parldrFg N would not be a problem. E 3M loss 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezonirig/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development PlI Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J- I Midwestem Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 4 "16 141 'TiTs Bor as a bout t he loca o the ev ergreen d rubs # a! a:. i # ' 4 ; - sknge # :4 1 '3 :/ (...'.: t�,fl # t#. t i #: #1 :A # # i 1 # : •/ ' i i a sou'Dir. ;4 t. - k4ii :.: Mr. Oney indicated that the pond will.bUy intact, but that some of the caissons will extend into the pond requiring minor pond adjustments, Ms. Boring said the landscaping on site looks gorgeous and has matred well in the short time has been Wl:# G erber ef: a : #,: t h at # appl # had agreed # removin the proposed J a g uar N:. t " and MAG wall sign. He asked if there we= other signage questions. Mr. Cline replied that this sign would undergo a reficing but that the color, size and height would remain the same. He stated that if Land Rover was no longer the tenant of tbat structux that green color would be removed from the sign. W711-1 17 W. Ger as k e d t app agrees # the cond i nc l uding ## !1 is # # o # Ja guar Mr. Oney agreed, saying that they will rmove the MAO sign, and the "Leaper," the chrome Orn Ms. Iona commented that the sky walk really unifies the canipus, and it seems to be consistent with the looL She had no further questions. Ge rber dete there * em no other que from #' #i:i M# .. •: ?rA S. He e4. that the text required this development to be "something noteworthy, striking and ## fi and t he proposal meets t .# #ter .1. i � .:.lit t #:: fl "# -:! #i # i -. 4 ## Wit: !# #:.; 1# ♦' :/ •/4 i t: R I #: M Development Plan P er i me t er PUD S i Grou Midwestern Auto ` M MAG BMW & Mint 11 IF III 111111111111�illillill -TL M N M. G '..: # m - L �- �-- j a i # ## t* Its - .A. � III a I OW01M a a 1 3 11 !C- 'A4* I'Iib 7rs NMI ITZM1 - - � o ff a Its 4*1 'A WIN )( P 0 4 ON 111111 16141O)OW , 16#11(tw-16goglif --k --Saf - 1 — . Ms. Reiss stated Condition 8 should read "Service doors need to be partially opaque or dark inted glass to further screen interior service uses." 1111111111 -- III �111 111111111 371==1 Mr, Gerber made a motion To uppi ve this Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed addibon generally meets the text and r requirements, the applicant has worked with staff to address issues related to the addition and, the proposal will allow fbr the expansion of a successful business with the addition of high quality architecture and site design, with eight conditions: 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Re2oning/Preliminary Development. Plan/final Development Plan III Perimeter Center PUD, Sutiareas D and J- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 20 8) That overhead doors utilize either partially opaque or dark tinted glass to further screen the interior service uses. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 5 -0.) Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lois Willard Clerical Specialist U Land Use and Long Range Planning 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Pretirninary Develo"ent Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 7-1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & MIN 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 venture Drive 1. MOTION: To approve this revised development plan because it confbrms, to the existing Subarea. J text and compbes with the PCD proviaions of Section 153.058, providing for the expansion and update of a successful Dublin business with seven conditions: 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Page I of 2 Rezoni*Prelirninary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3 .1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & MIN 6335 Perimeter L000 Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 4, 2004 3, Revised Development Plan 04- 029RDP — MAG Rolls Royce Auto Dealership — 6335 Perimeter Loop Road (Continued) 7) That the applicant utilize a rock that is more aesthetically suitable, subject to staff approval. « John Oney agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION - ►—��- C'.- Frank A. Ciarochi Acting Planning Director Page 2 of 2 11- 049Z /PDP /FOP Rezoniog/Pretiminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center POD, Subareas D and J- i Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Penmeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive 771 Minutes — Maiih 4,2004 Page 21 MOO 57T.WWWRL 0' i1p. q4ve to reach the leyd of a mosamc, whiefi is something that st Jamie Adkin s s aid this site is located in west-cenlml Dubli n , just north o f SR 161 and eag *rt Avery-Muirfield Drive. She showed slides of the site. The site has frontage on four pub rights-of-way: Perimeter Loop, Venture Drive, Perimeter Drive, and SR 1 16 1. Perimeter of is located to the west The site is zoned PCD, Planned Commeme District in Subarea J Perimeter Center plarL All adjamt properties are zoned PCD. 7be area to be modified is at the main entrimce of the site on Perimeter Izop Road. Proposed '* M-f-'a on the north elevation. A small retaining wall will also be added to the existing pond, and a couple of trees will be relocated because of the patway. The replacement door will be cloud except when vehicles are driven inside the building. the same type of door if maneuvering problems arise. The north side of the building will be modified. 049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Prelimioary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perirnetef Center PUO, Subareas D and ]- i Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW � � , II Mini • ly--Idk"e cl"Q is being revised to address exterior architectural and site modifications to an e3dsdng car dealership sales area- The Commission is to base approval on conformity to the approved compos plan Mr. Cline said this would be the only Rolls Royce dealership in Ohio. It is now owned by BMW, and the Phantom model retails for approximately $325,000. The clientele is very exclusive a nd expec t o h ave a h qua env ' E III purchasing : #. T he showr must be exclusive for Rolls Royce. He said there will be only one or two vehicles on site at any time. O ne will be in the showroom and the other in the &hop area for test drives. Interior alterations will be made to make an s howro om . Mr. Oney showed drawiM of the proposed modificatim, He said a pedestrian walkway in front would follow the natural slope of the pond. The grade obange is approximately 30 ftwltes. They will use stamped concrete in a scalloped fashion as was used at the BMW showroomL Them are three ballasten to provide an accent feature, A conforming directional sign will �dentify the Rolls Royce showroom entrance. id is 11 I-A-0 011 9777 7 5 Ms. Boring said a Code revision was necessary to avoid having to go through this proms for W Gerber asked why the Commission had to hear this application instead of it being handled I M m. ' f f # i # '_ 1 # •J! # # • # #. ## #': # Mir ' Map and i s a #:. R D Develo Perimeter Center * ■ Midwestern Aut Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter 1 ## R Y MmOff .M -J�M Z�W 4 BEE , ,I 1 A s ask �fl liot"I 141brt I it: 1 4 II MI aPpfication to rer- but wantW' 11-049Z/PDP/Ft)P 1 ! TV OF DU RUN { . + 3 ' ..I.:.:i�t RECO yj 7 r.. . ,.. Ja 1 I."' # ► _ ►.F s.# a'` + u rr ' .y r la a I a r # ra f r it ►! :v }Y :.:. r : f r. # I I'..; # Mr .:^ ! ! ! , �:Y # . t f. r - �+: #! E # t ► r f Y ! ## .} i ► #. f •: :.: i ! ► ::+ aFt `: 1s: :. i a a ii.:. � '+ I: } : Ir} }A ►t�# # :. T hat t bu f! = tl A or M bu i n tam o co and # I : ':1 s+■ T hat L an d R over i s no l onger the tenant M the bu 1A:'i the ' arc ele ment on the front # f F and the wa be ".IF ! `e and 3) TIw t 4: 7! aft :.mI° ,ff. yr p f ..:1', to show caused b the &-velopment of LAnd Rover. i Pi 40r 1 # W' :��: i Il:7.' ` - 4 re "" K � ' • tt, y. P.5 i +� w�t;i : :,1 � ' 4 >� "� �' vr4il lT 4't ,•.4 # t ���' t F � �+ uu 4 «'t :i *t " i a 1 w � :r e , #:t 4 ! .: #; i i I ir' � 1 f i ' � � � - # #� r + i I t ❑ r 4 w t M.. `. #�' .';) i t " e (- M Mi dwestern Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and I -I ► Grou PUD MAG BMW & Mini It Mr. Sprague asked about the vehicle demonsfttion back. Ms. Mrmgaffirld said it was fof test y o J " , mc , :: # # # # 3 #01 fj C r 11 - Z 1 ♦: ;# ' CAR J W—n XM�7- In R7� � a is MIMEt M waij, #4 t r #1.:4 M.t # 4 i# # it :# ; # • k, ##+.E. : a : :4 ! -. 1 # # # : r+: ::: i 1 # ##::. . 1'. 1i #~a S: # ► ## / #:+. L # ,{: [ # 1 '#1 - t: # ': ili : # :: i i' 1 #, c s /. f ' # #:•` i i1' f. Mr. Fenara asked why the sip am was inmused nine square feet. Mr. Brentlinger said it iii :: ' : whm "D was added. t M said } t# ". tex c leady stated that the :# 1 shall -not exceed 32 square fixi, not incIiiding "Dubfln Mr. Ferrara said there was no documenta6on on the height of the pylon. Mr. Cline Laid these were contained in the January 9 text additions. inain building. He would like to see the rock display rrmoved. R D Devel Perimeter Center r Subareas r and Midwestern i Gr oup PUD MAG BMW & Mini k RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of nuhfin_ fly SasariLMroadcg Rem in sm.3 a June 9, 1997 a ( high quality am grown in the Mr. that Counca kua approved AM unable W fill AMAMl positions The crew n now about 60 pnwnt of It tfut Consensus of to elladaate the Mme 3� the Iabca oon�>mos. �. systrn and to 1� lewd . Hstwie mind ow"ier adit on both sides the bridge at a 517,500 as amtUned ' the mama. It was the of Coonnl to pot tan the north side ust 7 to 8 foot in tbt tams , m suggested by Mr. i Mr, l3elwig tad that the total costa of h mt nkcW douse{!, fitdw ia= 0,500 for the the nmlh We of the - is sS99.752 budget was as ML suggested &at tgaay be used dha walls to Protect from to skl� suaesaed that tht: specify the total can not 5600,000. amt then fallow the on given by Wawa in the alb�ama. Vote en &e -din— - . McCash, yes; . Heiner, yes; Ma. per, Mayo 4mammbnr, yeg Mr. yew ML Pith, Yea. l 82-97- Oadhmam to Catkin Pistsds Bald Prop" to be a Puupose, the Public xtut to be made to mesa , Begskfng the Thereof to Se"ke Pay>omb in e[ Tmoes, a Qty with Ruselli[ on Co., Inc. Sharing Pisa d 11at Eokike PrVerdes, Rogalug, C and ECIM H:espod to Tbosa Mt a mielpal k hnprrhMMMMA Fqu Flood for the Deposit btisth Service a Related of an With the City school , and Dedarhg £iaer;ency. Mr. tmoeod shun is the tax ' for the A kWo tam" std Flamb Kraauuber to ttroat th'6 as cy kealatipn. C-VbeU the motion. Ms. Origsby that use need for may is to compi the theme the I to be made to odge &me is Mr. Mct ' ; Mr. Reiner, :Mrs. Hosing, MAYor Kreamber, ; Mr. tom. ; Ms. $ids yes. Mf R, M mayO , Yes; )4L 1, yes; Mrs. , Yep Mr. stain. Tkbled 0rdjn%nrec.Rr4iadtjM for Arflan Ordlnaace 41 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Mange in Zoning for 14.78 Aerea of Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Lapp Road and Perimeter Drive .from PCD, Punned CoumaaccDWaici to. PCD, Plumed ComnwrteDlstrkL (Mldweslem Auto Group) (AppBmnt: Chris One, 37 W. Bridge Street mpmeatiag i Charhs Aeh, Midwestern Auto Group, 5016 Post Road. Dublin, OH 43017) Ms. Clarke noted that a two-pap addendum to the text was distributed this Wig. She noted that the text was smeaded based on the discossinn at the public heating regardiog signage. She believes that the text reprc=tt the direction given by Council, and ssaff mtcomxnauds approval of the or&rtance with the amended tent. 11 -049Z/ PDP/ FDP Rezoning/Neliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3 - l Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter loop Rd. & 5825 Veatxire Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS �. N. ra .1 .in.• xrot t lucre 9, 1997 t g Mr. Rohn admd about the daages an the display 'Soggy'. I&. Clint stated that the *W1 f W is Vffb&Uy all display area. 1& 17arfm rioted dual in regard to the laodsraping plan, she CLMM Fe ify staffs Chae hated that Ma. Norvmteb had vaided tha the hadsmin chwize were •; aooepmbk. Mayor XMutuba tnodrod approval of the ordimna with the dspndiwits of Plamiag and 7aofng, the uxt snd the addend— sabmflted io CamtcU wit#ght `Mr. Mc(haah a000aded the motim .i Vene dm fhe metier - Mr. Bdoa, yea; Mayor Xmndvber, yes, Mr. C— pbell, yea; Ms. jSde Pittidna. yeti Mr. MoCash, yea. 6197 - Ordinance Yredding Change 1102 TaD1sg far Acr" I gaoled et th O! David Bead. 720 I+�eet of SR 161 Bps ReddenLkl to Pty, Pbunaed � gad aged Davtd Road (A.pplteaW Rt en: Coif, OH t aatted that and slag ate aovv with the tlmf fa ' d 55ouacal PlsotadAg bd3eves that at point is the futur datmdtatiam tower oo ibis y be diealrabk, The 6 to sting +wets an csicting 1 zhucktm pomble, so this use was added ntxl. it also ittdndea tint a tourez would be dbJect aplaova) of the of 7adng Appeals o� to authority at the d / Ma. ffide Pittalttga ' 06 that she is k"Wing a a •camm wludn the eutsre s iw= City ban not ben sesolvad. is prerccattm. responded test change moldy this as a pelffil ve use, and a se mi logical to ' at this time - staid that he specifically asimd anwhqxrwh g if would there tower thud and somwne there w i ld not Clarice oorftsmed stxpoose to this question did not come City staff, :Mr, that he dog not recall arty dfsctrsaioe ndy about a tower at this <laettidae. McCaatt proposed that it would male sense to allow om commuWMda" at this iocoon toatha than have as 1 subsmillm ben and a --nu 8f tower Road which was one the under oomsidaation. He would Cbetage dee ,language to'e diuUr m 'cowrie and stipulate that it would to be attad9ted to the e7( 2ft the a[te. Ms. Hide uga stated that she would have have the input of the SeMm nrl this rnatkr. She bd9ievcs it v • m add licit provision; silo would sri that portion dote as a niag mow. Ms. Hide Pim"ga moved to d fan Ma that refers specifically tD the The motion died for lark of . Ms, Hide: Pivalugx t Mr. 1 eDmliel fdtlow up with a repodt g how this ordinance walla the pending tderaramuNdndoas ordtnan�e. Pal discussion, Mr. Campbd:0 moved to add a 6, 'farther, a oomrtunicatians which equals or cxedYda 36 fcvl m us rdaled farMbm wAl be permitted to be 1 mounted on the existing electdcal sa sattdurea if approved...— 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Prellmnary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 1 -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS minutes of Sp%W Mettirdt of Duhfin C1iv Coitttal Paso 2 mfg Held Tu 2, 1997 i - Mr. Rai W. el Mr- Ig yes / 3dlh cell. yep ft yths: m4f" Krnzb b . Ms. Hide ttalttgs, yes; Mr. Carr I, ym o lens Ha 4I -97 - An Ordinance Praviding fat a Change to Znoil for 14.7A Acres f Umd Located at the Southeaat Camer of Perm l hop Rosd and Pt rhoetar Drlre fratn: PCD, Flimnad Caolmerce Drani lid to; PCD, Phoned Cosmerce Dht rkL oWwwrina Auto Group) (Apprmat: (]irk dint, 37 W. MrMr Saeet repressdea ChArlm Ash. l+ WWertesn Auto Grwp, 5016 Past Road, Dublin. Ohb 4U17) ftedlasmd ea a yropt nMU of the retonke was Chis CUM 71 Wla were tso re&UMd oppooreats to the rauating. Ms. Clarke stated that Midwestern Auto GrouP ra iooidug to trigte the stun of thosr eidatieg &dHties on Post Road and relocate to the Pairnetzr arm between Perfecter Drive sad Peruttotst Loop. The site consists of nearly 15 arses and the bud ft proposed is very >m mW and naored to this tow. The sate as prasadly stoned tinder the Perimeter Cate plan pa adts eonstrut3ion of offize amd MA tests, hotels and rtmlti4tory btaldmgs. The ptarposod plan ahtatn a new s Awsa within the Perimeter Center tea plat - && win 1. no proposed htaer is an ae" dealer and the haAft on is mcotte. with a a szed l ie plea, end uniam ah sigttage. The hnt kkM features three glass shuwroomt that lboa the mudhwest of the site. The patelaw has been divldsd into several areas The reza=g was approved by PlanwS Canmdssdon on Apnl 10, 1997 with 6 cooditioul 1) That the tern be revised to provide clarification m to V=W rile jmvnielor, bndwj*& gghtin& am disPky. pidu gt and bu61&s mshitthchus: 2) Thai acctts to Perimeter Wye be prohiibited 3) That a more acceptable sigh package be subrnitted as part of this rezonaM and inoo porated in the text; 4) That design for all norm water tmeuge oartt, alts uteih' des and usrp mvmnents including grading meet the approval of the City Engir>ear; 5) That construction be linked to approval of the prdirnmary pint for "Wall" Street and 6) That an appropriate subarta plan be submitted. Ms. Clarke eonantnted that the grading, lighting and ar lAtec un for this plea ern vary Unusual sad it does trot cordarm to Coda in a variety of ways. However, staff ad Pbwdug Coaarniatiem have supported the application because of the creative approach to this she wh" VAR house an auto dealer. In toms of the signaM Ms. Clarke eaptasrred that because the rtes less &outage on into streets - US 33, Perime a Loop, Perimma Drive ad Vestture Drive, they are permitted to have four seine What has boon proposed nee two signs 19 feet to height and 50 square fat early a not yet ldmtifxd wall si8n, and an 4eat5cetion saga ad the eatraaoe an Vonwre Drive. Duhiut's Code doss not permit signage over 15 feet and does not pe rink a combination of wall pins and ground sag". In response to Mr. Reiner, Ms. Clarke stated that there are other areas where this appiiaton does not resent .Dublin's Code: a 6-foot higb screen is requited along the perrmder of property along freeway ftomage and limited accesi fiveways. This site does not have 6-foot high scrarnirtp. She noted, however, that the Code spe dfically permas an auto dealenbip to have a rxrtaia percentage of the frontage to be used as a display area, and this site does not =teed that percentage. They have chosen to do the display in an atypical flultion. The lighting on the site is trot addressed by the Dublin lighting guidelines which call lion coasistw»q across the entire site. The application as proposded is for accent lighting on display Cara and up-lightirtg on features of display cars, Ms. Hide Pittahrgs noted that the pine is yr ry ta9d 4 but wondered about the effete the variances allowed in terms of signage, grading and 5ghrirhg would have on flatus rezoning requests. Ms. Ckarke noted that a variance from the 6 That screening regoiretnent in from of buildings aloag 33 and I -270 has been granted to several applicants previously, fnduding AlrI'oueh, the 7lhomaa Kohler rezoning, Cardinal Health and the Tuttle I I building The type of lighting 11- 0492 /PDP /FD1P Rezoning/Preliminaty Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and I -1 Midwestem Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd- & 582S Venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Nbutes of Specw Spec' Meetinit of bult;m City Caunol Puej Meeting Jun 2, 1997 gatd — - — S 8, �j squealed in this case is very unusual and uaiqua rmd not thinly to be requesW by another r user. The planning C:oatmiision looked favors* on this application due to the comprehensive design wbich incorporated these individual elemen s Mr. Campbell pokrtO out a Planted Camroare District has its own inning, Oneflort, tedtnieany, these would not be caled ` variancaa'. Ms. Clausal agreed that these elerneats are at variant to rho prewo Code, not variances in dtmrsadvim There u no hardship situation lavolved. bdr. CampWl also noted that there had been a twmmitmerre that this vrould be tba last rat dealership on the she, and asked if the krm ner bas agreed to deed restrict the rest of the l propchty. Ms. Clarke salted that the Land owner has agreed to this detd reruic ion, adding that be ales controls 77 assn. I� Ma Hide Pitteduga pointed out that the Mania t rezoning had sorae similar anaxnstarxes to this rezoning in that they are both PCD's and hays di ainguEahfag chamacristkx wbich)atify unique treatment. l Mayor Kaamtubm asked for further ch rificadon on the size of the eigna. How do the Dnbrm standards compam to those Ln Pervrrm1 r't Ms. Chwke stated that neither the Dublin Coda nor the Perimeter tart addresses a she whh a tiw f}omagts such as tbh one. The Perimeter Mal] Arid the of gwtels have bm tightly controlled in toms of ugeege. There art no restnc im on colon Mryar Yjunstubetr asked about thejustific bon for diiminatatg *a momding. I Ms. Claim coalned that under the Dublin Code, auto dealers are perutitted 25 pea t of their froritage to be used as d€splsy, They could choose to do ro mounding along US 33 and it would still erect Coda This is tht only auto dealer of the three on the site which will have hantsge gong US 73. Mr. McCash asked what the intended ancillary commerclal uses would be as refkrred to in the next dated May 16, 1997. Ma Clarke responded that these could be a mwatmd, a sandwich shop, etc whirls could be anci lafy uses within a strum" primarily devoted to office use. Mr. McCash c gxvssrd some conmm about a reference to spacial cultural averts to take place on the site with oo mention of obcahrheg permits for such ev eats i Mr. McCesh also noted concern about the outside speakers and music systern and the powbt7ity of sound emitting onto the atfjsoam properties. The sound systtot could be used to ` ottrsa aratomers much the same as signsge would do. f f Mr, McCs sh asked if the sign on the Land Rover buildrsrg will be Wffwh 1 to the 15 fbot. height provW.. Fie could envision it 65 foot tall portion of the Land Rove building with a sign on it AN" the tent Language. Ma. Clarke responded that has not been specified. The Plarming Cormdslon indicated they would review this as a design dement when the buMing plant are submit tad. i Mr. hdcCash also noted that the signage as proposed would exceed the thrto cnbr Code restriction. Mayor Krardwber commented that he believes they sbouid be restritxcd to a drreo color , trta) mares on the signage per Dubli n code Mr, Reiner asked If willow roes are still banned as soceptable trees due to the drainage problems with the spades, i Ms_ Chu responded that they arc not on the approved tree fist I F I, Chris Cr'me 37 W B662e Street stated that he represents the appliaent He dispkayrd a model h of the site and proposed devctopment. He stated that the she has 2,600 feet of fforimp on h fear public roads which constitutes it unique situation for sigane. He expkemed that the hdght of the signage was the major concern at Planning Commission. The signs as proposed m of I' 11- 0492 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J-1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drove Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hel June 2, t 997 t 9 t II btusbed aturdnum or stainless steel, mid the logos will be cut out and back 9f. He added that a logo is needed fix each of the 12 dealers on tte sign ttnd for this renu the eppfcara could not corgmmm on the 1 S fart reqjeded He noted that the major area where St sign e s propmai diffrs born Code is the logo wordng on the sign The sign with the logos, however, !J is artistic and ecithetieally pleasing. The Land Raver sign an tkat building is nasM and n not I an tma where they want to negotiate. They will still have to have the approval of Pla nnirg Ceaatmission fbr that, end he tittered Comicil that the sign will be comparable with the sine of The building. The other silo at the service eotraoce is a directional sign and will contsat no ,i lcgt>z Mr. NdcCub noted than the tent indicates that the MpliwR plans to mme the proseetBMW pylon sign which is an internally Murntnemd sign K. Cline responded that it will be used as an internal sign and not viaaale from the street_ ! M[_ Cline commended that the concept for the grading plan involves an innovative and ` k aesthetic approach to cownfi tg a car dealership. The proposed design sloping wild cooeoei the stock of nn which are downhill from the tips of the "9nge s" used *sr afiapiay Cara The eompr6maive plan thr the site integrates grading, architecture, quality design and sets a precedent The Planned Dinrict use encourages unagbta m design and the oration of unique development standards. They believe they have done so with this appiia¢ ion. In torn of special events, the anticipation would be for a special eveat ouch n a aymphory concert for the ocmannnstty where the cars would be removed from the showroom for the overt. Than will be ' gdery space in the dealership where in ahiibirs could be displayed. Tba stuck will be a low level dardeah type. The low level ground lighting and tht music will be subject to staff review. I& Reiner pointed out that ifthe intent cftbe Wulteaping is for mmening purposes, the proposed plan cells for only one third u many spruce area as are needed to Accomplish the t objective. Mr. Cline responded that they are committed to screening and will work with statffto take this :! Mr. Reiner suggested that the wiliow trees be removed since they will & the pond I& Cate responded that the applicant understands the drawbacks of the willow trees but plans to include thm He will work with the City's lendstype archkw on this issue. Discussion mrainued about they mounding and screating of the finger ar ise. Mr. McCash noted that he has conceaas abtwr the lighting left on in tho sbowrooma Ax'W hours. Charles Aeh Mdwemn Arno t =4 stated that they anticipate leaving some lights on in the evenings as is currently done, but they will be at a much louver level. It will be tasteful, subtle and elegant Mayor Kranstuber suggested that the applicant put into writing that the sifter houra fighting will be subtle and of accent type onhy. II Mrs. Boring commented that under the Revised Charter, Council his the option of suspending fl the vote after a public hearing until the next Council meetittg. In view ofthe many imm being raised, this may be appropriate, G Discussion continued about the signage for the Land Rover building. [ Mr. McCash indicated that he would like to add lutgaege to the text outing that no wail signs + l would be permitted along US 33, IF Mr. Cline responded that this would not be a problem - Mrs. Stillwell coramcrned that this is an important piece of land In teams of its location at a gateway area. The discussion egmdercd by a creative and innovative application has been good. She does not believe the issues raised tonight art insurmourdable. She woald like to ! 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /final Development Dian Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and ) -t Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 venture Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of StseaPl Moetinaof Aublin City Ctmr W PAWS Meeting M4A June 2, 1997 t A� idesdsfy the mnaining isnsos and move forward. Mrs Baring stated that this application Is utdque in its design and deals with display in a dif b ent macmer than other car deakrstups. It dots not act a yreaedem to allow car dealerships to puir tors on top of mounds for display. It is instead a eociVrehemive de s bwov>rive and creative. Mayor Kranstuber iturnmarized that the issues ldendfled tonight are: the somber of sptuae trees needed to sacs the text language regarding sign eokM intsrtsal Uiaiin6on in tba aho� and noise level of music on the sits. �I Mr. Campbell suggested that the vote be postponed untg the ten meeting to allow 5x' redndting of the tart to address concerns idenfted WhgbL He movtd to suspend the public hearing and to bave the ordinance voted on at the June 9 Council meeliag. Mrs Boring seconded the [notion. Mr. [aim asked for clarification an the interior trees since the present proposal meets coda Mr. Pd= stated that if the invent is to screen the inventory, they [tend to add one thud mama trees. There are also errors in the specifiatioru for the uxua sheiks. Voce: an the modon - W. McCasb, yes; Mr. Reimer. Yee, Mtn. Basing. yam: Mayas. M Mr. CatnpbdL yes: Mrs. Stillwell, yes, ML Hide Pitulugs, yes. The ordinance will be voted on at the June 9 C una7 meeting Ordtn*nce Yd. 63-97 - An Oroanct Providing fora age im Zsrsirt� for Aaw Located the Terminus of vtd Read, 7201 firth 161, Proea Suburban devdal District to. nod Comet Tics (ASP - P sod David Road ubstntion) (AppilenaL Straw7v, A aactrk Power, V '�7 St er, Columbus O)bia 43 ) rums of the rezoning : Edward Mates, 349 ea Ptace, Grov e . S17 Nonhfild l4 OA; ry, 5672 , ohn E. Brady, 41 S, Strad Roger V 6668 David Road, relta, 6656 David Dubiitti. OR, oneots of the wars Ethel 6629 David Road, V41 le Clarice stated this is rezoning fin eight ] the David Rood also - the bade eight lots, four of ere on the cast side the road and four on eat The a& k ou plea the right of for David Road 4 -25 acres The site h y r R-4 tend is developed single fam+3y homes appraxittotdy IOU. The proposal r a Planned Dist+iu for cal substation and be sa .She noted t the teat in negotiation belyfin staff and AEP, and that Courrci� their vote u Jura 9. This aypl on was reviewed by Catrtmisrion on 1, 1997, . and t�ecartutseaded a 1 by a vote of S four coodhitms 1 11+at an a development tut be tted which audines 1 rn fin= development meters and specific a7sof the buffering; e 2) That the ed David Road right way be vacated by City h 3) That be provided to the enclusivefy, and 4) a height of the faciliti a kept to the absolute m. Ms. CI showed slides of the to Council. Staff has ad with the appkwd to d p 1 ai little disrupt ion As ale for the remair+ing orhood David Road was t as rivate weft, and it is ear how much heavy rttIIioo teak it can handla section that will be strutted will be the north d of the site. Two added hen bean set aside for the ' y to purchase fhr an on of Village Park%vay. The ' wfll be surrounded try a S- i ,hound and by . Village Parkway can entkd to the west through nonMm two lots to up with it proposed road 11- 0492 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Pian /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3 - Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & S82S Venture Drive RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 CITY OF DIIIIUN - sw SmIll IlAk ON = AWMADIk 614MUSSO Fix 61417614M -6,6 trMill - F, J -, Mw ail gmnffwwm,��, Tj,:jFA-' I wk•'iol rv;f Page I of 2 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and 3- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Petimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive RECORD OF AMON May 1, 1997 i - 7. :ii # i TM T ha t figh be s*ec iii ftw rev and staff i ## # v i : #w. .# 2+ t.:.: # # wh i6:_ ►mi a#:: 3:.r! o # #. c ondition s b # t#i t # :# !. # #:.. if Weeks • NL 7 a 6 M ffil a[�, 1 0 =7 r, *74 0 O 0 I= "IdL all 5. Development Plan 97-034DP - Perimeter Center Subarea I - Midwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drtve Bobbie Clarlm said the Commission made a positive recommendation on the Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) rezoning April 10. Action on the development plan was tabled. The development plan will be subject to any conditions City Council adds. Most of the current issues deal with landscaping, lighting, grading, and signage. 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Oevelopment Plan/Filial Development Plan Pefirneter Center PUD, Subareas D and )-I Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini Li-,anaWr Loog Rd. & 5825 Venture D"ve Du P lanning ♦:: Zon # Minutes - May 1, 1 9 97 Page 24 Mr. Loecklider asked about the lighting of the display fingers. Ms. Clarke said less fight than permitted was being proposed on the site. She said them may bejustificafion to work with the applicant for something that was far more subdued, but perhaps more dramatic, than what is normally associated with a car dealership. .•.R i S,. ' `i ., —i'71. a I: : A! #i t �I i # :. # ' t # ;:. R :R t ',: # R t # ' :• i # # I t: w: r i #'.. r 1 • # i '..::':: rrr 1 # -' ►# #i ! # , :1 ( i / 11 #� / 1A i ! #L 'I 1 19F 1 f M L sR iQ-1 '/ r'#L#:.;: ill y J' R M r r U) ,. ::I f .# #: : M Ii 0 ;# # : f r r ` •:.:� RR +.�r'w. i # L 1:. ! A::%t wi :) ♦ :# * s YI r.:. i : ,i'... �� i# .. (. „# i .wit r . # i.': Ms. Clar La m any # :. a # {: # ► : 1 pr i or to the la ax E t .r ay a- ;r t he grade : # # 4 between the sM : and # #' sometimes di t .: rr a ny r tea# # ' R r r # f alth ough t mound is in p lace. Chris Cl ine , att sa the gaso will be on # ::' the can ♦: 1 and 1 will not # 1 He said the tank will hold 6,000 gallons of gas. • ;o r'.. ° t;r • # # ' # +. r R ° # # # • .1 R : V, # # ': # ' # # ' ;R He understood that the City Engineer wanted 250 fed between offiet, driveways, but it was not a policy or code, He saicl the Perimeter Center text only a requires 100 foot offset. Mr. Me said they would work with staff to meet the street tree requirellnent. He sad they had cali street # for f eet of frontage not on center have been a rranged t o c omp l ement s ite . He . • t wou mee t C ode . ,:. Mr. Me W their sign proposal basically complied with the Sip Code, He mid the wall i SIP was arftc. The wall sip is a sipafttre to the building itselL There are two ground pylon signs of stainWa steel material. A translucent plastic material will be used that the light will softly shine thro ugh. 11- 040Z / PDP / FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development P;an/Fjrjaj De velo p ment Pe • # Subareas M and Mi Aut Gr ""335 Perimeter L000 '�I u,i ����� �h � ,I IIII Du Planning and Zoning C( iissio h6nutes - May 1, 1997 F -age 27 either. He said if Range Rom insisted on a wall sign that was otherMse compatible with Du C ode , 1 ' . }: there cou be 1 : i nto S ubare a A §rZr,7U7"4IInT"" �{' # .M .ie MI � ,# :4:: i # A k{ '. 1 i'a Y:1 1 r }f : •.i i i # # 1 3 4 'A :# '. oil. IE ` 3 U # I ' # r, :# #:' I dt . :•k * 41 44alfto-k #: IMYii 4Y[ A k 4 6 io : - -:i f # 4 14! 41 We M1: 'k I, K +."/.6i :- V # +:. i':.: ► / .r: r r *# # #..,; : 4NY %r # "r. 1 t' # ril al t: } :r #':. .; •i+i �:. '. #; it,' '1 �I� ' i .1 7 #1 # # # 't 7# ; `II. U # ! 1 # r :# 1#: # "" #�G1:• M ## +:r# w 3:.. M rF # i ./ `+ ' # °s' r 1 # :rr# 3 'i ;" 14: - �# # : ;i Y #;. .d # ' was #,#` ♦a1 : #; A # {-' #:. he M r. R ar i an, P eplow and # 111 tk.... ta ll- Zbewbff said 15-foot sign were acceptable, W. Sprague liked the mp, but said 15 feet is too iM - su a h o 13 f eet w t i ' 11- Rezonirt Develop D eve l o p ment Mi dwestern Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and G roup PUO MAG BMW & Mini 6AUM .. ## Dublin Planky1,1 ng and Zoning Cc 2±«¥» Nfinutes - 997 Page 28 8) IIW sidewalks be constructed atong the east and we-at frontages; and 9 17hat a ©« sift plan which incorporates all of the conditions be submitted widk two wee h. Mr. Cline agreed to dke above condhions. Ere said the sidewalk on Venture Drive was part of the Mr. Bowman agreed. ne vote was as follows: Ms. Chinnid-Zuercher, yes; Mr. LecJffider, no, Mr. Sprag<,«+ :£° Peplow, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Approved 4-1.) I Vj;F-1744 , ± 11 * # 4 <w «< « I 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3.1 Midwestern Auto »., tom MAG BMW & Mini DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CORD MSION RECORD OF ACTION April 10, 1997 stloo 1Ltr b^ 011 ISOt •1236 614n614M 7be Planning and Zoning Commission took the following scam at this meeting: 3. Rezoning AppUcadon 97-034Z - Revised, Composite PlzwVevel mieat Pam - Midwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drfve Location: 14.78 at to looted at the southeast corner of Penmeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive- Eridin PCD, Planned Commerce District (Penmaw Cater plan). Requests PCD, Planned Commerce Distda Amts to the existing Perimeter Center composite plan and davlopment text, under Section 153.058, are proposed to crate a new Subarea 1. Pr%xmd Use: Proposed auto dealership. Applicant: Cbarl Aeh, do Chdstopbea Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Iylublin, Ohio 43017. M071ON #1: To approve the revised composite plan pion of this rlezonfog application, becam it is a compatible use, presents the desired character along US 33 /SR 161, conforms to the PCD regulations and the Community Plan, with six conditions: 1) That the tact be revised to provide clarification as to visual sale gimmicks, landscaping, lighting, auto display, grading, and building andsitecture; 2) That access to Pcdmeter Drive be prohibited; 3) 'That a more acceptable sign package be submitted as part of this remoning and incorporated in die text; 4) - That design for all storm water management, site utilities and improvements fixluding grading meet the approval of the City Engineer; 5) That oeeMetion be linked to approval of the preliminary plat for 'Wall" Street; and 6) 1'tcat an appropriate subarea plan be submitted. « Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. Page 1 of 2 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and J -1 Midwestern Auto Group PUO MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive • r 4_ � r Y TF , I SIR I i, I { # 'i �EII{ .t #' 1'r tEt tii. - { #I N' :ti { «x +;l t 11 i :i "1: i tr i,t rt •* tr, «i 1 Y a.; # # w'.i9 1111111' w I Wts i:,I +i 1 j I r t:; t i t1 R t { a i. ♦ ►t4 � i { . t °' ,!'# ti �'I r ` / � ^ t', I .E .i �; +{: i;. 1 t I it ' i t r .1 }! i 1 i ';'.. i JrSt �:' '.ti ': { t }M: ai / R.: ♦ t v:: li :y {+*F. : t. i 3►R "t: 1 1 7.t II i t: � -. t' I Lw... t :. f° i 11- 0492 / PDP / FD P Rez oning/Preliminary t Oevel opment P lan Mid A Group P.. MAG B MW & Mini Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutos - Aril 10, 1997 Page 9 Mr. LwkUer liked how the finger design breaks up the mass of asphalt. Mr. Kuspan said each finger was raised at the same slope per each side of the site. They chose a four -foot ekmuion change being Penmetler Drive, and a six feet along US 33. They are sloped to provide drama by ascending upwards, and they also block the view of the rest of the cars, Mr. Kuspan said the highest mound was about six few higher than US 33 and about 120 feet away. W. Lecklider asked about the ederior sound system. Mr. Cline said it would play a low -key ambiance -type music. The music will be totally inaudible at the neater of any adjoining road. The exteriar sound system is subject to staff approval. Loud intercom speakers would not be permitted. Ms. Clarke said the tent cites that the sound cannot be heard offsite. Mr. I acldider asked about the coffee shop. Mr. Cline said the coffee shop will . attract the public as well as customers. The goal is to provide a gathering place. Mr. Ferrara asked if the flagpoles are signage. Mr. Cline said corporate flags were regulated as ' signs, and any national flags were permitted. W. Banchefsky said there was no limitation on the number of flags represaatmg any polttical entity. Mr. Ferrara asked if the per of the water feature would be glassed. Mr. Kuspan said typical rip-rap will not be used. They want to find a grass that will work with the retention. Mr.. Cline said they would like to duplicate the pond in front of the Borror Corporation. Mr. Kuspan said there is a WAG* sign at the end of the wall. He said the stainless , steel, backlit channel letters are proposed, six to eight feet tall. Ms. Clarke said the sign shown by Code, was a roof sign, and not permitted unless written into the development text. She said the revised signage package had not been discussed. Mr. Cline said them were 54 customer parking spaces. Mr. Fermata said if this was to be a gathering place with a coffee shop he was concerned about adequate parking. Mr. Peplow asked if the landscaping on the model provided was indicative of the quantity of material to be used. Mr. Kuspan said yes. Mr. Peplow asked about the 25 permmi of road frontage being used for auto display. Ms. ClaYlve said it is permitted at dealers citywide and includes US 33. Mr. Cline said the pod displays equal 25 percent of the frontage, and the lot coverage is 60 percent. Ms. Clerlm said the display pod calculations have not been verified, and Perimeter Center permits up to 75 percent lot coverage. Mr. Sprague was impressed by the plan. Mr. Cline said the parking lot will not be seen, and the cars for sale will be artistically arranged. It will be the best looking dealership Dublin has ever had. Ms. Chinnid- Zuerd= asked if 750 can was the optimum number or would they have less in the beginning. Mr. Cline said 400 cars were for sale presently. 11- 049Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas D and l- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini 6335 Perimeter L000 Rd. & 5825 Venture Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Nfinutes - April 10, 1997 Page I I in E Mir MAS n-iT 1 4 Y MMAW. row" # ' 1 * ^ w '. lira ii • :# #.# 191 M �- i UTWI Mills * '41;� I) * * MAIM7.7-TE'77M f;'7;7-#1P7-w#77 Mr' $pnWz said issm stM needed to be revievmd. Ttis may set a premdent, in the futum, wO &e j ustificatim should be solid. Mr. Peplow agreed. FT75 jvilAi ! a iTT 1717 Y. - �01 * F � MMAPITIX-rmr prewnt& the &&e chusda alm US 331SR 161, and conforms to the PM regulations aM the Community Plan, with six conditions: 11-049Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development ftn/Final Development Plan Perimeter Center PUD, Subareas 0 and 3- 1 Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mint RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of T1iNin r itV c4umeil Medina p Meetin Hel March 17, 1 99 7 9 O nance No. 40-97 - A /ordinwan�cemoved ce Providing fora ante In Zoning for 1 9 res of Land Located o hwest Corner cgs Road and Paul r Memorial Parkway f Strictei Sa an Residential D o: PCD, Planned Commerce ra and H bright Properties) ( cant: Duke Realty do Je$Br Sm 37 W. ad Street, Suits 725, bus, OH 43215) Mrs. Boring ' oduced th moved referral to the PI and Zoning Commissi Mr. C bel l seconded th - Mrs. es; Mayor Kranstu es; Mr. Reiner, yes; g yes; Mr. McCaA mpbell, yes; Ms. a Pittaluga, yes. / Ordinance No. 41 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.78 Acres of Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Midwestern Auto Group) (Applicant: Midwestern Auto Group, Charles Ach, 5016 Post Road., Dublin, OH 43017) Mr. McCash introduced the ordinance and moved referral to the Planning and Zoning Commission Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Mote on the motion - Ms. Fbde Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yea. Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Kransiuber, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Or knee No. d2-97 -Ace mince to Update the al T�aflit Plan for the of Dublin to Tmprov Circulation to the North d West of SavZ11/161 Intersection. Mr. Campbell introd the ordinance. Ms. Clarke noted this item is scheduled a Punning Commission ends next week, f0 erral from Council_ Mrs. Still ggested this would be a opportunity for the T rtation Task Force to 'de input as well as the g Commission. It is understanding they are concurrently next Th ay. Mr. pbell moved to refer ' to the Planning and Commission and to the T portation Task Force eir review. . Stillwell seconded otiom Mr. Campbell amend s motion to include that Transportation Task F and the Planning Commissi eport back to Council ' r to the time of second g on April 14, 1997. Mrs. Stillwell nded the amended mo ' - Mrs. Boning. y . Campbell. yes; Ma. Pittaluga, yes; W. Ruiner, ; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Ma Kranstuber, yes; Mr. M b, yes. ance No. 43~97 - An inance Amending C Sections of Ordinance (`Compensation Plan d Authorizing Certa' age Adjustments for rtsia Job Clasaitkadona actively. Mrs. Stillwell inured the ordinance Mr. Hensley exp that when the union v was proposed, the ce crew leader and auto echanic positions were ved from the proposed P study. Now that those ons have been removed om eonsideration in the g unit, staff is recomm ng that Council make ad' eats to the salary a in the classification plan to ow these to be consid as mid - managers and o ' e the bargaining unrt. asking that this be held er for a second reading public beating at the r>e ncil meeting. r There will be a secondXadiag at the April 14 CoVed Ong, 11- 0492 /PDP /FDP Rezonin9/Preliminafy Development Wan /Final Development Plan Perimeter Center Pt1D, Subareas D and l -t Midwestern Auto Group PUD MAG BMW & Mini rl Oorimator I nnn qrt R SR *) Vantiire f)rivP