Loading...
37-08 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES Davton I_c~nl Blank, Inc. Form No. ?01143 37-08 Passed . ?0 Ordi~~arzce No. AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 16.17 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EMERALD PARKWAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF INNOVATION DRIVE, FROM PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT, TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (TUTTLE NORTH - IGS -CASE NO. 08-020Z). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, ~ of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this ~~ day of , 2008. Mayor -Presiding Officer Attest: Clerk of Council CITY OF DUBLIN.. Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 Phone: 61.4-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 TO: Members oP City Council FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager.~k~~ ~cr' JS DATR: June 12, 2008 INITIATED I3Y: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning RI;: Ord. 37-08 -Tuttle North Extension -IGS Rezoning (Case No. 08-020 Request This is a request for the approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan co modify an existing planned district and development text fora 16-acre parcel, zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, in the Tattle North Extension PCD, on the east site of Emerald Parkway at the intersection with hmovation Drive. The preliminary development plan will allow the construction of two corporate office buildings for the IGS company. First Reading City Council Comments This ordinance was introduced at the June 2, 2008 meeting. During discussion, Council sought clarification in three areas. First, Council requested additional information regarding the land/easement dedication and the improvements (i.e., bike path) within Reserve A, the open space within the northern third of the property. Attached is a memo from economic development staff with this detail. Second, discussion occurred about setback requirements along I-270. Staff has added information to the development text to address this consistent with the original Planning Report. Finally, Council inquired about the applicant's desire to construct a LEED certified project. Staff's follow up work on this has resulted in a minor text change to remove the screening requirement for alternative energy saving rooftop mechanicals. This item will be looked at closely by Planning in the final development plan. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission On May 15, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the rezoning/preliminary development plan application. The Commission had no concerns regarding the proposal and recommended approval of the rezoning/development plan with four conditions: ]) The applicant provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's stormwater management plan requirements and flood control Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) All compensating storage improvements must be made to Reserve A prior its dedication, should it be deeded to City; 3) The Cext be revised to incorporate comments identified within this report prior to scheduling for City Council; and 4) That the development text be revised to include language within the LEED Certification portion that would allow the use of additional alternative energy saving Memo to Council re Ordinance 37-08 Rezoning -Tuttle North Extension June 12, 2008 Page 2 of 2 and creating devices, the details of which will be reviewed for approved at the final development plan stage. History The original rezoning/preliminary development plan for the Tuttle North Extension Planned Commerce District was approved by City Council on February 17, 1998. The approval included a condition that required a 193-foot building setback along I-270. The applicant has revised the YexC to allow a 1.00-foot building setback to conceal the parking areas along the I-270 frontage. The purpose of the rezoning is to approve this modification. Description The proposed rezoning would include two high quality, signature office buildings, with a total of 176,400 square feet That will incorporate complementary architectural design through the use of stone, brick and glass. The applicant is pursuing LEER certification, and the development text allows for the use of solar panels and other alternative energy sources. If approved, the rezoning would permit the construction of two corporate office buildings: a 100,800 square-foot, four-story building located in the southeastern portion of the site parallel to I- 270; and a 75,600 square-foot, three-story building located north of Che larger building, oriented east and west. The proposed development, at a density of ] 7.,025 square feet per acre, is within the permitted density of 17,500 square feet of building area per acre. The text would permit Council to approve a greater density if a parking structure is utilized. Access to the site is through a primary, 'full-service drive on Emerald Parkway at the intersection with Innovation Drive. The main drive from this access leads to a traffic circle located between the two buildings. A secondary right-in, right-out access drive iu the southwest corner is shared with the property to the south and is intended for service and deliveries. Sw'face parking areas are located north and west of the two buildings and an underground parking area is located below the larger building. The preliminary plan shows a plaza located north of the larger building, with tiered landscape areas and a retention pond located between the building and I-270. A large reserve area (Reserve A) occupies Che northern third of the site and contains a portion of Cosgray Creek. The plans also indicate the preservation of a large existing tree row that runs along the creek. The development text states that this area will remain a natural reserve bat may include bikepaths, pedestrian access or other park elements, or may be dedicated to the City of Dublin as park space. Improvements to Reserve A will be completed with Phase One of the proposed development. Recommendation Planning recommends Council approval of Ordinance 37-08 aC the second reading/public hearing on June 16, 2008. Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo crrr ot~ nt!et.tn TO: Members of the Dublin City Council FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager';.; ~y .i'` - j DATE: June 6, 2008 INITIATED BY: Dana L. McDaniel, Deputy City Manager/Director of Economic Development RE: IGS Energy, hzc. Follow-up Summary At its last meeting of Juue 2, 2008, City Council requested clarification regarding the land/easement dedication and the improvements (i.e., bike path) within Reserve "A" of IGS Energy's site. Council may recall that the Economic Development Agreement (EDA) authorized by Ordinance 18-08 and approved on April 21, 2008 addressed this issue. At the time Council approved the ordinance, staff and the company were to finalize the language regarding the dedication of the necessary easement within Reserve "A" to allow for a bike path and park-like amenities. The final language of the EDA, Section 2 (g)(ii), reads: "City further desires that Company grant an easement to City in order that existing portions of bike paths serving the City tnay be joined, and that there may be public use of the bike path within that portion of the easement area. City agrees to provide funding to pay for the construction and maintenance of a footbridge, bike path and other park- like amenities similar to a park within the area of the easement. The City will make its best efforts to fund these improvements as part of its Capital Improvements Program. A site plan of the proposed easement area, including a concept of the bike path and park- like amenities to be placed in the easement, are attached hereto as Exhibit `C'." Attachment 1 is Exhibit "C" to the Economic Development Agreement. Exhibit "C" was included in the staff report to Council regarding Ordinance 18-08, dated April 2, 2008. No changes have been made to Exhibit "C" since this report was presented to Council. Easements described in the EDA language, above, are intended to accommodate the footbridge, bike path and park-like amenities within Reserve "A". It is the intent of both the City and IGS Energy to keep all areas outside of the easement and improvement within Reserve "A" as natural and as maintenance free as possible. Recommendation For information only. Exhibit "C" Attachment 1 -r -_ I -270 - - - - - _ ___ ,\ ~-~ PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting PLANNED CONIl~'IERCE DISTRICT 12/19/97 Revised 6/12/48 TUTTLE NORTH EXTENSION VEST OF I-270 AND EAST OF EMERALD PARK~~'AY PURPOSE: The site is approximately 16.170 acres. It is located along Emerald Parkway north of the existing Qwest building. The parcel is intended for development as office and office related uses because of its proximity to the freeway, Britton Parkway and the office uses at Tuttle Crossing and Tuttle Crossing North. The following material is provided in response to the Composite Plan contents of the PUD in the City of Dublin Zoning Code: A. Indicating by schematic plan the general development character of the tract, locations, types oftenants, probable lot size and other development features, including the perimeter landscaping, open space buffers or "no-build" zones and major pedestrian and bicycle routes. See attached exhibits. B. The proposed provisions ofwater, sanitary sewer, industrial waste disposal and surface drainage facilities, including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. The proposed development will have water sen1ice made available by way of an existing 16" waterline along the west side of Emerald Parkway. Sanitary sewer service is available through an existing 21" sanitary trunk sewer that crosses the site on the north side of Cosgray Ditch and an existing 12" sanitary sewer along the east side of Emerald Parkway. Storm drainage will outlet at the Cosgray ditch. Storm water detention will be pmt~~ided on site as necessary to comply with Oluo EPA and City of Dublin requirements including post-construction water quality. The storm water requirements for both phases will be met with the installation of the pond along I-270. It is the intent of the applicant to install the pond in its entirety during the phase I construction. C. The proposed traffic circulation pattern showing public and private streets and other transportations facilities, including their relationship to topography and existing transportation facilities with evidence that the proposed development shall not adversely impact existing facilities. The proposed development will gain access from Emerald Parkway via a full service and right-in/right-out curb cut. {See exhibit B) The right-in/right-out curb cut will be coordinated with the adjacent land owner to provide access to both parcels. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 City Council meeting D. The proposed schedule afsite development and associated facilities, including streets, other transportation facilities, utilities, services and other facilities. Site development will commence after approval of zoning and final development plan and obtaining a building permit. E. The relationship ofthe proposed development to existing and future land use in the surrounding area, the st-•eet system, community facilities, services and other public improvements. The proposed site will complement existing freeway oriented corporate users presently witlun the City of Dublin and Tuttle Crossing North. Surrounding uses include existing offices to the south and east, existing and proposed industrial warehouses to the north, and proposed commercial uses to the west. F. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the land to prepare required land improvements, including street, water, sanita-•y sewers, waste disposal, surface drainage and other facilities for subdivision development required by the Subdivisions Regulations. The applicant is in contract with the owner and can provide documentation if necessary to show sufficient control over the property. G. Any deed restrictions to be made applicable to the property the subject of the application. N/A per new PUD code requirements. General De`~elopment Standards 1. General Intent a It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office and commercial development consistent With Tuttle Grassing, Tuttle Crossing North and Emerald Parkway. b l~tid-rise, signature office buildings will be promoted along freeway fi-ontage. c If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin codifies Ordinances, then the Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commercial District. d Based on the proposed curb cuts shown on Exhibit B the developer shall provide far a crass access easement when appropriate between the proposed PUD area and adjoining office parcels to the south. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting 2. Signage and Graplucs Except as otherwise herein stated: a All signage and graphics shall conform to the Dublin Sign Code Section 153, including but not limited to set back and placement, maximum size, height, color copy restrictions, lighting, landscaping, etc except as noted herein. b In the event of a lot split each building shall be permitted building mounted corporate office signs along the I-270 frontage. c Ground signs shall not exceed a height of eight feet or a maximum of 50 square feet per sign face. All ground mounted signs shall be of a "monument" design, placed on a masonry base and integrated into a landscape feature. d One monument sign will be permitted at the main entry an Erneralcl Parkway. In the event of a future lot split the applicant may add an additional sign panel onto the monument sign so long as the two sign panels do not exceed the maximum square footage as defined above. e One joint delivery identification sign will be placed at the joint right-in / right-out curb cut on Emerald Parktivay. The delivery identification sign may contain generic information, including building addresses, and directional arrows, in no case shall this sign identify incliviclual tenants, exceed a height of tlu~ee feet or a maximum of four square feet per sign face. f The joint delivery identification sign will be located 8 feet back from the Right of Way as required. However, the sign may be placed adjacent to the pmperty line between the parcels in an effort to properly service both parcels. 3. Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated (all lighting shall meet Dublin exterior lighting requirements): a External lighting within all subareas shall be cut off type fixtures. b All types of parking, pedestrian and other lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. c All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of black or dark bronze metal. d Landscape and building up lighting from a concealed source shall be permitted. e All fixtures shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting f All building illumination shall be from concealed sources. g No colored lights shall Ue used to light the exterior of buildings. 4. Landscaping: a As many existing trees as possible within the boundary of the site will be preserved (See Tree Protection Plan, Exhbit E}. b Any portion of a developed lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be landscaped with lawn as a minimum. c All areas shall be landscaped in accarclance with the Dublin Landscape Code and all areas will remain in agriculture or be seeded prior to development. d The landscape treatment for Emerald Parkway shall be as shown on Exhibit H. The palette shall include the species shown an Exhibit H. 5. Fencesi~~'alls: a No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. b Wood fencing which is used for screening purposes shall be pei-rnitted if fully buffered by landscaping. 6. Utilities: a All utility lines including water supply, sanitary water service, electricity, telephone and gas, and their connections ar feeder lines shall be placed underground. Ivleters, transformers, etc. may be placed above ground, but shall be screened from view. To the extent possible utility line placement will be sensitive to existing vegetation. b All utilit~~ connections shall be out of view or screened other than those used for emergency sen~ice. c All mechanical equipment and related structures shall be effectively screened from grade level view by a fence, vegetation, or wall of harmonious architectural material and character. d Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings, shall be screened to meet Code with material harmonious with the buildings. Tlis requirement shall not apply to the alternative ener~~~ som-ce equit~ment described in A1.11.3. IGS Parcel Development Standards A1.01 Description and Acreage: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting 1. IGS parcel is approximately ~ 16.170 acres. The parcel may contain office uses similar to those uses in Tuttle Grassing. These uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office of major institutional uses. Mid-rise signature office buildings with ar without parking structures will be promoted within the site. 2. It is the intent of the applicant to provide a phased development that will accommodate the growth of the corporation over time. Following the rezoning the applicant intends to file an application far Final Development Plan approval for the phase 1 portion of the development. The building lat~out and placement is designed to alla~v the corporate user to connect the phase 1 building to the future phase by the use of an atrium or breezeway. The phase 1 and phase 2 properties are designed to be split in the event that future conditions warrant such actions. Cross access easements would be provided at the time of a property split. 3. Conditional uses as listed in the SO District may be permitted within the site, subject to the canclitional use procedure and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 4. Above ground ar detached parking garages shall be considered a conditional use and shall be subject to conditional use procedure and Dublin City Council approval. Parking that is beneath the building, underground, and fully enclosed shall be a permitted use. A1.03 Permitted Density 1. The permitted density in this subarea shall not exceed 17, 500 gross square feet of building area. per net acre of site with surface parking. The density may be increased with parking structures but shall be subject to conditional use and Dublin City Council approval. A1.0~4 Traffic and Circulation: 1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Emerald Parkway. Z. Curb cuts on Emerald Parkway shall be as shaFVn on Exhibit B. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the Dublin City Engineer. 3. A full service curb cut shall be provided at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. ~. Aright-in/right-out curb cut shall be provided on the northern portion of the Qwest property and shall be connected to this development to allow efficient delivery movement and combined access to the existing Qwest parcel to the south. A crass access easement will be provided at time of final development plan. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting 5. An updated traffic study will be provided to the City prior to the Final Development Plan submittal and all required improvements will be agreed upon with the Cit4~ of Dublin Engineering Department prior to Final Development Plan approval. A1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Parking for all office uses shall be provided at a minimum of one space per 25Q square feet of gross floor area. 2. In the interest of environmental sensitivity it is the intent of the applicant to reduce the paved areas by providing smaller parking spaces to accommodate compact cars. Compact car spaces shall be clearly signed and shall be a. minimum of 8'x16' in dimension. Compact car spaces shall not exceed 20% of the total spaces provided. 3. Loading dock doors will be recessed into the architecture of the building to minimize their appearance. To allow efficient truck access the required screening of the loading areas will be achieved through a series of landscaped islands and street treatment along Emerald Parkway as shown on the landscape plans. A1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks off I-27Q shall be 1QQ' for buildings and parking; far Emerald Parkway the distance shall be 3Q' for all pavement areas, 50' for buildings (See Exhibit B). 2. The setback along the northern property line shall be 15' for pavement and 4Q' for buildings; for the southern property line the distance shall be 25' far pavement and 35' for buildings 3. In the event of a property split beriveen the two phases the setbacks along the new property line shall be Q' for shared access, and Q' for pavement. =1. Buildings shall have a minimum of 50' of seuaration unless connected with a building enclosure. 5. *Per City of Dublin Cocte maximum lot coverage shall be 70%. For buildings of 6 stories lot coverage may exceed 7Q% with conditional use approval for the City of Dublin. A1.07 Height Requirements: The height of either building shall be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet including parapet. A1.08 Waste and Refuse: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence (if fully screened by landscaping), ar materials consistent with the building materials, or depressing the grade. A1.09 Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or pennittecl to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened to meet Code with materials ha1•xnanious with the building. This requirement shall not apply to the alternative energy source equipment described in A1.11.3. A1.10 Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall be according to or meet the intent of the City of Dublin Zoning Code. 2. The applicant plans to utilize the existing tree row and landscape material to meet the intent of the vehicular use screening requirements along the southern property line. The applicant will work with staff at final development plan to supplement the existing tree row with new plant materials as required to meet the intent of the code for required screening. 3. It is the intent of the applicant to utilize the existing plant material and tree line along the Cosgray ditch to satisfy the perimeter screening requirements between the applicants parcel and the industrial building to the north. The area labeled on plan as Reserve `A' shall not require screening from the industrial property to the north. 4. In the event of a lot split between the two phases there will be no screening requirements between the two office parcels in an attempt to create a cohesive looking development. 5. Landscaping along Emerald Parkway shall conform to Emerald Parkway landscape plan. 6. Additional landscaping shall be provided at all full service curb cuts from Emerald Parkway. 7. Any portion of a lot upon wlich a building or parking area is not constructed shall be graded and seeded, at a minimum. 8. All healthy trees located within the building and pavement setbacks will be preserved if possible. 9. The area to the north of Cosgray Ditch, labeled on the plans as "Reserve A", ~vi11 remain a natural reserve area. With the completion of Phase I improvements the applicant will clean, seed and maintain tlis area as a natural meadow. The City of Dublin, at its option, may install bike, pedestrian access ar other park elements PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Revised since June 2, 2008 Cite Council meeting with an easement to be granted by the applicant. The Applicant may also, at the City's option, dedicate the area labeled as "Resen%e A" to the City of Dublin as park space. 10. It is the intent of the Developer to provide an aesthetic landscape treatment along the I-270 frontage. The landscape treatment shall incorporate a combination of plant material, walls, ponds and fountains. The design intent of the landscape treatment shall he to soften the proposed buildings, provide a high quality visual experience from I-270 and the proposed buildings, and create a corporate identity for the proposed user. To maintain consistency along I-270 the landscape treatment will incorporate the same or similar plant materials, if available, as the Qwest 270 treatment to the south. While materials will remain the same the arrangement and placement may vary with the addition of the ponds and will complement the building and overall landscape. 11. It is the intent of the applicant to install all of the proposed pond, I-2701andscape treatments and the Emerald Parkway landscape treatments with the Phase I portion of the development. A1.11 Architecture 1. It is the intent of the applicant to provide lugh quality architecture and design far the proposed office buildings. The buildings will incorporate 4 sided architectural design with natural materials such as brick, stone, and limestone as the primary materials. EIFS may be used as an accent material. Glass color and reflectiveness will be determined based on energy efficiency, to assist in LEED certification. 2. In the event of a future property split between the phase I and phase II development the architecture of the second building shall be complimentary to the phase I building and utilize similar materials. 3. It is the intent of the applicant to pursue a LEEDS designation for the building which may include the use of solar panels, wind turbines, andior similar energy devises to reduce the dependency on electricity. If included, equipment will be located on the roof of the building and may extend above the parapet. Alternative energy sources will be further defined and additional information provided, at final development stage. 4. The two buildings as shown in the attached exhibits may be connected in the future through a common atrium or breezeway. Such connection will be designed to be complimentary to the architecture of the building. In the event of a future lot split the buildings may still be connected as described above. CITY OF DUBLIN_ Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo TO: Members of City Cauncil FRONT: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager DATE: May 29, 200& INITIATED BY: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning RE: Ordinance 37-08, Tuttle North Extension PCD -IGS Rezoning (Case No. 08-0202) Request This is a request for the approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan to modify an existing planned district and development text fora 16-acre parcel, zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, in the Tuttle North Extension PCD, on the east side of Emerald Parkway at the intersection of Innovation Drive. The preliminary development plan will allow the construction of two corporate office buildings for the IGS company. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission On May 15, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the rezoning/preliminary development plan application. The Commission had no concerns regarding the proposal and recommended approval of the rezoning,/development plan with four conditions: 1) The applicant provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's stormwater management plan requirements and flood control Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) All compensating storage improvements must be made to Reserve A prior its dedication, should it be deeded to the City; 3) The text be revised to incorporate comments identified within this report prior to scheduling for City Council; and 4) That the development text be revised to include language within the LEED Certification portion that would allow the use of additional alternative energy saving and creating de~7ices, the details of which will be reviewed for approval at the final development plan stage. History The original rezoning/preliminary development plan for the Tuttle North Extension Planned Commerce District was approved by City Council on February 17, 1998. The approval included a condition that required a 193-foot building setback along I-270. The applicant has revised the text to allo«-~ a 100-foot building setback to conceal the parking areas along the I-270 frontage. The purpose of the rezoning is to approve this modification. Description The proposed rezoning would include two high quality, signature office buildings, with a total of 176,400 square feet that will incorporate complementary architectural design through the use of Memo re. Ordinance 37-48 - IGS Rezoning May 29, 2048 Page Two stone, brick and glass. The applicant is pursuing LEED certification and the development test. allows for the use of solar panels and other alternative energy sources. If approved, the rezoning would permit the construction of two corporate office buildings: a 144,844 square-foot, four-story building located in the southeastern portion of the site parallel to I- 274; and a 75,644 square-foot, three-story building located north of the larger building, oriented east and west. The proposed development, at a density of 11,425 square feet per acre, is within the permitted density of 17,544 square feet of building area per acre. The text would permit Council to approve a greater density if a parking structure is utilized. Access to the site is through a primary, full-service drive on Emerald Parkway at the intersection with Innovation Drive. The main drive from this access leads to a traffic circle located between the two buildings. A secondary right-in, right-out access drive in the southwest corner is shared with the property to the south and is intended for service and deliveries. Surface parking areas are located north and w°est of the two buildings and an underground parking area is located below the larger building. The preliminary plan shows a plaza located north of the larger building, with tiered landscape areas and a retention pond located between the building and I-274. A large reserve area (Reserve A) occupies the northern third of the site and contains a portion of Cosgray Creek. The plans also indicate the preser•~Tation of a large existing tree rot~~~ that runs along the creek. The development text states that this area will remain a natural reserve but may include bikepaths, pedestrian access or other park elements, or may be dedicated to the City of Dublin as park space. Improvements to Reserve A will be completed with Phase One of the proposed development. Recommendation Planning recommends Council approval of Ordinance 37-48 at the second reading/public hearing on June 16, 2048. 37-08 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIA-ZATELV 16.17 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EMERALD PARKV4~A~' AT THE INTERSECTION OF INNOVATION DRIVE, FROM PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT, TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (TUTTLE NORTH - IGS -CASE NO. 08-020Z). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate {see attached map marked Exhibit. "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of , 2008. Mayor -Presiding Officer ~4ttest: Clerk of Council Shier R_~ LI '~ / 11 11 ~ LI RI ~ _ ~t __ ~--` OLR RI / PCD ~ PCD N RI ~ ------ --- -------_-~, RI j / - OLR RI 11 - - ,\~~.~, ~ RI ~~o / ~~b ~~~l~ ~ -- OLR ~}`~ ~ RI RI \ ~__ ~- ~~'~~ I _ r--- , `-4o PCD ~a_~~~ PLR PCD ~ ~ ~\' Lc ~ : OLR __ W d ~ PCD ~ PCD ~_ ~ PCD --- .~ ,PLR PCD OLR ~---~.._~ --, ~ I _ N City of Dublin 08-0202 /~ Land Use and Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan /~ ~ Long Range Planning Tuttle North PCD - IGS Feet Emerald Parkway 0 250 500 Proposed Site Plan A 08-0202 IZezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle Norih PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway i::['71~ C)l~ I)l~t3L1~ land Usa and Lonp Ranpe Plonnlnp 5800 Sher-Rings Road Dublin. Ohio 43016.7236 Phone/ IDD: 61 4-4 1 0 4 600 Fax: 514-410-4747 Web Sita: www.dublin.oh.u5 January 2007 EXHIBIT "B" REZONING APPLICATION (Code Section 153.234) TO EXPIRE ORDINANCE NUMBER CITY COUNCIL (FIRST READING) CITY COUNCIL (PUBLIC HEARING) CITY COUNCIL ACTION NOTE: All applications are reviewed by Land Use and Long Range Planning for completeness prior to being processed. Applications that are incomplete will not be accepted. Applicants are encouraged to contact Land Use and Long Range Planning for assistance and to discuss the rezoning process, and if needed, to make an appointment for apre-submittal review prior to submitting a formal application. I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: Preliminary Development Plan (Section 153.053) Other (Please Describe) II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address: Tax ID/Parcel Number(s): 2 0 0 3 0 2 2 6 0 0 5 6 9 2 3 Parcel Size (Acres): 1 (. 17 0 Existing Land USelDevelopment: Open Land Proposed Land Use/Development: COZ'pOI'dte Office Existing Zoning District: PCD Requested Zoning District: PCD Total Acres to be Rezoned: 1 6.17 0 III. REZONING STATEMENT: Please attach separate sheets (8.5 X 11) to the back of this application with your responses to the following sections. A. Please briefly explain the proposed rezoning and development: A SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL 5. f~OR MEETINGrOt~ /O(~ r ~ '~ ~, ' B. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the existing and potential future lart~i rise character of the vicinity: ~, C. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan and, ~fi~~~~ 1~sed rezoning meets the criteria for Planned Districts [Section 153.052(6)]: M~~, 1 8 20i!: 111' .,r 2.~~•~ . . D. Briefly address how the proposed rezoning and development meet the review criteria for Preliminary~0a rJ~j~N~~n`~pi~rgval by the Planning and Zoning Commission as stated in [Section t53.055(A)] (SEE ATTACHMENT A): LUNGG ' ~~' 0 an ~ Page 1 of 5 Has a previous application to rezone the property been denied by City Council within the last twelve months? ~ Yes ~ No if yes, list when and state the basis for reconsideration as noted by Section 153.234(A)(3): IV. PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR INITIAL STAFF REVIEW: Please submit -arge (24x36) and small (11X17) sets of plans. Please make sure all plans are stapled and collated. Large plans should also be folded. Staff may later request plans that incorporate review comments. Fourteen (14) additional copies of revised submittals are reouired for the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS AND THIRTEEN (13) COPIES Please notarize agent authorization, if necessary. FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY FOURTEEN (14} COPIES OF A TAX PARCEL ID MAP indicating property owners and parcel numbers for all parcels within 500 FEET of the site (Maximum Size 11X17). Please contact Land Use and Long Range Planning if you need assistance. FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LIST OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET of the perimeter of the property based on the County Auditor's current tax list, including parcel number, owner name (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service), and address (Maximum Size 11X17) It is the policy of the City of Dublin to notify surrounding property owners of pending applications under public review. Please contact Land Use and Long Range Planning if you need assistance. FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF THE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF SCALED StTEISTAKING PLANS SHOWING: a. North arrow and bar scale b. Location, size and dimensions of all existing and proposed conditions and structures (significant natural features, landscaping, structures, additions, decks, access ways, parking). c. Proposed Uses (Regional transportation system, densities, number of dwellings, building/unit types, square footages, parking, open space, etc.). d. Size of the site In acres/square feet. e. All property lines, setbacks, street centerlines, rights-of-way, easements, and other inrormalion related to the site. f. Existing and proposed zoning district boundaries. g. Use of land and location of structures on adjacent properties. IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING SCALED PLANS: a. Grading Plan. b. Landscaping Plan. c. Lighting Plan d. Utility and/or Stonnwater Plan. e. Tree Survey, Tree Preservation and Tree Replacement Plans IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) SCALED, ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS with proposed colors and materials noted. IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14} LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF SCALED DRAWINGS SHOWING: a. location of signs and sign type (wall, ground, projecting, or window). b. Sign dimensions, including letter sizes and proposed distance from sign to grade. c. Copy layout and lettering styles (fonts) of signage. d. Materials and manufacturer to be used in fabrication. e- Total area of sign face (including frame) f. Type of illumination [~ MATERIAUCOLOR SAMPLES (swatches, photos, plans, or product specifications). Include manufacturer name and product number, Page 2 of 5 V. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): This section must be completed. Please attach additional sheets if needed. Name (Individual or Organization): Duke Realty COrporatlOn Mailing Address: 5600 Blazer Parkway, Suite 100 Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614-932-6000 l=ax: 614-932-6290 Email or Alternate Contact Information: C~O Jim Clarke VI. APPLICANT: Please complete if applicable. This is the person(s) who is requesting the zone change if different than the property owner(s). Name: D3Vld C. Warner Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): IGS Energy Mailing Address: SO2O BraClentOn AVenue Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614-764-5581 Fax: 614-923-0470 Email or Alternate Contact Information: VII. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF OWNER/APPLICANT: Please complete if applicable. Tliis is the primary contact person who will receive correspondence regarding this application. If needed, attach additional sheets for multiple representatives. Name: Jlm HOUk organization: Bird Houk Collaborative Mailing Address: (Street, city, State, zip Code) 600 Creekside Plaza Gahazlna, Ohio 43230 Daytime Telephone: 614-418-0600 Fax: 614-418-0614 Email or Alternate Contact Information: Gary Smith: gsmith@bird-hook. com Page 3 of 5 VIII. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANTIREPRESENTATIVE(S}: If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. 1 Jim Clarke/Drake Realty Corporation ,the owner, hereby authorize David C. Warner/IGS Energy to act as my applicant/representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. l agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Date: ~. ~y, O g' Subscribed and sworn to before i e this ~ ~ day of / ~ ' 1/~, 20 ~~_ _ State of ~ `, ~ ~Q~~ttAL A' ~~~ ~ ~~,~ ~ ~ ,~,( ~~ ~ ~/~ (I~ ~? . Natl>ry Public, Shlte d Ohb County of ' ~~~j'(!~,~L~ Notary Public _ `~..~~ ~ ~~[_ +. - jy{ CommissionExpl~09-27'2 o !- ~~~ ~~,,. -%R ~ o . fX. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by City representatives are essential to process this application. The Owner/Applicant, as notarized below, hereby authorizes Clty representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. X. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The City of The Owner/Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner/Applicant. XI. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and I D3V1C~ C~ Warner/IGS Energy ,the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. ie information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects lr e a id cor~cty(to~tlie,~est of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: / ~ /~~ LyV ~_ .,:~(PR~ACL•~;;'. r7/~~/~ ji Subscribed and sworn to before me this j ~ da of 1 ~r~ , 20 : VINCENT A. PARISI .. 11 ~. y ~ ~ -f-- Attorney at Law State of ~ C1~~ ~ t : ~,, Notary Public, State of Ohto _ /r n : sT ~ ,~~ o ,~ My GQRltriis~n Has No F~iratlon Q ( / ~ ~ ~j t ~ 0~~,~' Section 147.03 R.C. County of F~an~.~l~ Notary Public I/ z~NL __ ~.hf OF NOTE: THE OWNER, OR NOTED REPRESENTATIVE IF APPLICABLE, WILL RECEIVE A FACSIMILE CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF THIS APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: Application No: P&Z Date{s): P8Z Action: Receipt No: ~~ gMtS-Ewe-l~o: ' '~' ~. Date Received: +~ ~q. Received By: ~7nn f~ Type ofRequest: ~;/ ' ~ N, S/ EJ W (Circle) Side of: ~ ~~~ ~GL ~ n~/1 ~/ G~~~~ . Nearest Intersection: 1 In!/t ~~ \n ~~/ ~ Y I Distance from Nearest Intersection: Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT A: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA § 153.055 PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA. (A) Preliminary development plan. In the review of proposed planned developments, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall determine whether or not the preliminary development plan compiles with the fo-lowing criteria. In the event the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the proposed preliminary development plan does not comply with a preponderance of these criteria, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall disapprove the application: (1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Zoning Code; (2) The proposed development is in conformity with Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan, and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; (3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the city and Immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; {4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the city so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; {5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; (6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; (7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; {8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the sur- rounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non-conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedes- trians; (9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; (10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall accept- ability of the development plans contribute to the orderly development of land within the city; (11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; {12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard devel- opment regulations included in the Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; (13) the proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs In the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the city; (14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; (15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; (16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. Page 5 of 5 ~' -~ B I R D H O U K 600 creekside plaza _~~' l gahanna, ohio 43230 COLLABORATIVE P: 614.418.0600 F: 614.418.0614 www.bird-houk.com March 18, 2008 Re.: Application for Rezoning, parcel # 200302260056923, 16.170 acres. III. REZONING STATEMENT A. Please briefly explain the proposed rezoning and the development: The purpose of the rezoning is to modify a PCD zoning application done on the property and approved by council February 17, 1998. This proposed rezoning is consistent with the intent of the original zoning in that the site will be developed as a high quality, freeway oriented, corporate office facility. This zoning will deviate from the original zoning to allow the reduction of the building setback along I-270 from 193' to 100'. This zoning will also increase the parking setback along I-270 from 50' to 100'. This will allow the I-270 frontage to be defined by high quality architecture and landscaping rather than parking and buffering. This will also allow the existing Cosgray ditch, and its associated tree line, to remain intact instead of being relocated as called for in the existing zoning. The remaining land to the north of Cosgray ditch will be left as a natural area or will be donated to the City of Dublin as park space. B. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity: The proposed development will be a high quality, freeway oriented, corporate office facility consistent with the Tuttle north and Tuttle crossing development to the south and consistent with the original zoning for the site. Architecture will be complimentary to the existing development incorporating a high level of architectural design and detailing as well as high quality natural materials such as brick and limestone. Landscaping will be consistent with the I-270 landscape treatment to the south of the property incorporating similar materials and design and adding ponds, fountains, retaining walls and terraced landscaping. C. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan and, if applicable, how the proposed rezoning meets the criteria for Planned Districts [section 153.052(6)] The proposed rezoning and development reflects the desire of the Dublin Community Plan to provide "premium office" for this site. Premium office, in the Dublin Community Plan, is defined as office that requires high visibility, has a greater number of employees, and needs access to arterials and proximity to interchanges. The proposed corporate office use meets these criteria and will provide a high quality office development that compliments the office uses in the area. The proposed rezoning and development meets the intent of the Genera! Deve{opment Criteria set forth in section 153.052(6) of the City of Dublin Zoning Code, The plan design, permitted uses, arrangement of uses, landscaping, screening, and buffering, tree preservation, circulation, parking, signs and utilities are all designed in accordance with the General Development Criteria and will provide a high quality office development consistent with the surrounding properties. ~~; ~',U~3MITTED TO COUNCIL C~1„ ~ ~~~~~~~ _• ~ ~ \ ~~~ -~~~ ~~~ fOR MEETING Ot~l~~ ~'~CiR ~ ~; z~r~~ GI I Y OF UUdLIN LAND USE & THE PLACE MAKERS. , ch+tecture tannin ~ urban desk n ~ LONG RANGE PLANNING ~ p g ~ ~ ~:~,~,,~~~~~~. ~ v~-~ao~ D. Briefly address how the proposed rezoning and development meet the review criteria for Preliminary Development Plan approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission as stated in [Section 153.055(A)) (See attachment A). The proposed development meets the criteria of 153.055(A) as stated as per the following: 1. The proposed development as designed is consistent with the purpose, intent and standards of the zoning code. 2. The Community Plan calls for the development of a Premium Office site for this parcel and the proposed development is reflective of that goal. The site is intended to be a high quality corporate office facility and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network beyond what has previously been zoned on the site. 3. The proposed development complements the character of the area, provides high quality development standards, and provides a corporate office environment that generates employment for the city and advances the general welfare of the City of Dublin. 4. The Proposed uses are located in accordance with the Dublin Community Pian and are appropriately located and designed to protect the value of the surrounding area. 5. The proposed development will have an area dedicated as a reserve or deeded to the City of Dublin as park /open space to meet the open space objectives of the Community Plan. 6. The proposed development will protect the existing Cosgray ditch instead of re-locating the ditch as previously approved and will protect, to the extent possible the valuable tree rows currently established. 7. Adequate utilities, stormwater controls and access are provided with the development as required by the City of Dublin. 8. A traffic study is being completed to determine the necessary steps required to minimize traffic impacts and provide ingress and egress to the site to allow for a safe and convenient circulation system for the site and surrounding development. 9. The relationship of building and structures to each other and neighboring property are designed to promote orderly development, minimize potential impacts, integrate the site into the larger community and maintain the image of Dublin as a quality community. 10. This development is designed to provide a high quality office image along interstate 270 and will be developed such as to contribute to the orderly development of land within the city. 11. Storm drainage for this development has been designed to minimize the impacts to grading, maintain the existing Cosgray ditch, and will meet the requirements of the City of Dublin and State of Ohio pre and post development stormwater quality regulations. 12. The high quality design of this site and benefits of a high profile employer to the City of Dublin justify the deviations from the previous zoning and any deviations from the existing zoning code or subdivision regulations. These deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned District regulations in that they allow the flexibility to create a high quality Premium Office development that matches the intent of the surrounding area. 13. The proposed building provides high quality architecture and design and incorporates materials similar to the surrounding development and complimentary to the City of Dublin's requirements for architectural quality. 14. The proposed phasing of the development is appropriate for the development of a corporate office facility intended for a growing corporation. The infrastructure currently exists to support the phased development and the development phasing is designed to ultimately provide for the overall intent of the development. 15. The proposed development will be adequately serviced by the existing infrastructure and will not place an undue burden on the public service systems for the area. 16. A traffic study is currently being conducted to determine the necessary improvements to service the new development. The traffic study will be completed prior to the submittal of the Final Development Plans and the necessary improvements will be agreed upon with the City of Dublin Engineering Dept. prior to Final Development Plan Approval. architects The place makers. land planners landscape architects Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & 7illon, Inc. Engineers, Surveyors, Plonners, Scientists Proposed IGS Building List of Contiguous Property Owners Within 300 Ft. 3-17-08 273-008177-00 273-001594-80 6136 WILCOX RD 61 bl SHAMROCK CT APPLIED INNOVATION INC DUKE REALTY CORPORATION 5800 INNOVATION DR SUITE 100 DUBLIN OH 43016 5600 BLAZER PKWY DUBLIN OH 43017-7525 273-002454-00 BLAZER PW 273-001594-90 ASHLAND INC 61 bl SHAMROCK CT TAX COMPLIANCE DEPT DUKE REALTY CORPORATION PO BOX 14000 SUITE 100 LEXINGTON KY 40512-4000 5600 BLAZER PKWY DUBLIN OH 43017-7525 273-012215-00 EMERALD PW 273-004557-00 BOOS-DUBLIN LLC 6136 WILCOX RD 2961 MCCORMICK DR DUKE REALTY CORPORATION CLEARWATER FL 33759 SUITE 100 5600 BLAZER PKWY 273-001532-00 DUBLIN OH 43017-7525 5721 SHIER RINGS RD COLUMBUS 8~ SOUTHERN 273-004544-00 OHIO ELECTRIC CO 6161 SHAMROCK CT AEP R 8~ A PROPERTIES TOM JOHNSON/TAX INFO COOR 61 bl SHAMROCK CT 1 RIVERSIDE PLAZA DUBLIN OH 43017 COLUMBUS OHIO 43215-2373 SAFETY SOLUTIONS INC ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 273-010594-80 PO BOX 8100 ~ `~ ;Ii < ~ 6000 PARKWOOD PL DUKE REALTY CORPORATION : . :ii l S! i [-:i i .~ C,~)t.1PdCIL DUBLIN OH 43016 ;,~/~ -~~~.i-OR ti1ECTINC ~~I~~ SUITE 100 273-007012-00 5600 BLAZER PKWY 6136 WILCOX RD DUBLIN OH 43017-7525 STATE STREET REALTY CO ~~l~,' '~ 7 SCHOEDINGER FUNERAL `", !~ ~ ~ 273-010594-90 229 E STATE ST 6000 PARKWOOD PL COLUMBUS OH 43215-4381 DUKE REALTY CORPORATION SUITE 100 273-007488-00 5600 BLAZER PKWY 6136 WILCOX RD a ~ ~~~ ~ DUBLIN OH 43017-7525 APPLIED INNOVATION INC ~4~~~ 5800 INNOVATION DR MAR ~ 8 2008 DUBLIN OH 43016 `~ S ~I E 3 LAND l1 ~..,_~~,,,, e~P~~~en~~ „ %, ~,,~~,>:~~,,,~x~ene~~e a OWG RAN~fF ~t.~rnitdtit~.C. . 5500 New Albany Rood, Columbus. OH 43054 • Phone 614.775.4500 • Fax 614.775.4800 j ~ ~ - v ~(~ °I~~~'.'.0~7i March 13, 2008 Scott White President Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. 5020 Bardenton Ave. Dublin OH 43017 Re: IGS access via Quest parking and signage land transfer Dear Scott, This letter is to confirm that, pursuant to discussions with Onno Steger your real estate agent, Duke is amenable to working with IGS to create a new access point that would serve both the proposed IGS site as well as continue access to the Quest site, consistent with the attached Entrance Exhibit 1 drawing. It is our understanding that the costs associated with moving the existing ingress and egress point will not be born by Duke, which includes both the new curb cuts and related movement of parking as well as rehabilitation of the current access point. In addition, given what we anticipate will be a need far dual signage, Duke is also amenable, in conjunction with the land purchase agreement, to deeding a small piece of land to IGS, at no cost, for such purposes (see attached Entrance Exhibit 1). If you have any questions, please feel &ee to contact me Very truly yours, Ja s T. Clark uke Realty Corporation Senior Vice President n~ c~~! ~ ~~ 1 ~. RECFIIIEI~ ,~~ c~, i~: i f i 2008 ~:il Y Ui• sJlilii.i~Y _Ak~ JS~ ',i.•~!?~i(,~/:K 'i .'ill.; ~~- Sao ~ r c =~ 1. -. / LL_~ J_-~ I, I i~ ;i ~I ' ( II I I ~ 11 I I I I ~ ~ ~, I I I II I I 9 I I I I I ~. , I I _ O ..... ~ r, ~ -- t I ~_ U ~ ~ ~ i I 1= I. I O II II ~ ~ ~ I - ~ 1 I ~ f d - O ~7 ~_'- I - U - I I r 0~, I ~ --- r I~ I - 1 I _ i 1 ,-, ! i I I ,r ~ . O I I ~!' ~ I I I r~ :..::~, .:~ I ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ 0 ~ I I %~ /, ,, d ~ /~ d ., I r ! ~ // ~! Y~_ .... _ I I ~' '~ I .~- -1--, ~ ~ , _ ---- -----U----v ___-V--- __~-- ,-- ~~y i ~ ~ // /~ % / /~ i y ~ ~ i` ~ / I } ~ / I ~ / / / ~ ~~ ~ / / ii ; r -, ;~~~ i _ n sip - --~ - t ~ -t-% i . ~-r ~- r I .. _- ®® ETC C1~vEtOr11El1T rll~V rr~. • t ar,.>n rrn * ase GS Corporate Heacqu~•tc~rs -- - rr.ECUwcgv sr[i.wnui _, ~ , I, _ - J ~~ ~r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 1 I~~ ~ I ail ~ u I i ~ I i i II I I I ~ ~ I I I I ~ I;; I I - 0 ~ ~ O ~_-- Ir I ,_ o: ,. ~_ ~ I o _ ~ ,, ~ i I _ I ~ I ~ ! _ - - l rI ~,~ ~ I' '' ' ~ I __ !~ ~' .I. I _ I i i __ i - -~ I ~ I I ~ I i J ~ ~ I ~ 'r ~ . ~~r I ~ ~~ ~, ,~ 0 Q p ~:~=.. ~~ ~ ~ I ,, ~ I ~ ~' I - ----__-U------U- ~ - ~ o ,~ ~%-, W ~ ~~ -- _._ ~ ~ ,._ i i~ i ~ ~~ ~ ii ~ ~` I r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ ,~ ~ -_-: n ~ ~_ _~ N i ~ _,N i i '; .., _ ~, ~__,_ ~ r -- 'GS Corporate I leadc~a'ters ""' }D~""' --- _ - ~~ 1~11ELN~MMY:iIC UY0VI - .-...... .. .. .... ... Wp f,2 CN_.ar.:e Ixi~M ~~~~ Boundary Description for 16.140 Acres North of Parkwood Place East Side of Emerald Parkway Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Survey No. 3011 of the Virginia Military District, and being ail of that 0.930 acre tract and all of that 15.213 acre tract conveyed to Duke Realty Ohio of record in tnstrument Number 200302260056923, said 15.213 acre tract being part of Reserve "A" of "Shamrock II" as recorded in Plat Book 57, Page 7, and described as follows: Beginning, for reference, at a pk nail found marking the centerline intersection of Parkwood Place with Emerald Parkway as shown in the deed to City of Dublin of record in Official Record 31969C08; Thence N 23° 44' 19" E, with the centerline of said Emerald Parkway, 356.82 feet to the north terminus of said centerline as recorded in Official Record 31969604, the same being the south terminus of the centerline of said Emerald Parkway as recorded Plat Book 86, Page 24; Thence S 81° 55' S1" E, with the north terminus thereof, the same being the south terminus thereof, 53.80 feet to a 3/," iron rod found marking the southwest comer of said 0.930 acre tract, the same being the northwest corner of that 11.178 acre tract conveyed to Duke Realty Ohio of record in Instrument Number 200301030002980, in the east right-of-way line for said Emerald Parkway, the True Point of Beginning; Thence with the west perimeter of said 0.930 acre traci, the same being said east right- of-way line as shown on said Plat Book 86, Page 24, the following courses; N 23° 44' 19" E, 187.25 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature; with a curve to the left, having a central angle of 08° 08' 49", a radius of 1482.00 feet, and an arc length of 210.73 feet, a chord bearing and chord distance of N 19° 39' 54" E, 210.55 feet to an iron pin set; N 58° 51' 06" E, 57.52 feet to an iron pin set; S 77° 06' S5" E, 8.17 feet to an iron pin set marking the northeast comer of said 0.930 acre tract, in the west line of said 15.213 acre tract; Thence N 05° 12' 34" E, with the west line of said 15.213 acre tract, the same being the west line of said "Shamrock II" and said east right-of-way line as shown on said Plat Book 86, Page 24 and Instrument Number 199910140259083, 518.51 feet to an iron pin set marking the northwest comer of said 15.213 acre tract, the same being the southwest corner of that 6.658 acre tract conveyed to R & A Properties of record in Instrument Number 200110150237695; Thence S 84° 47' 06" E, wifh the north line of said 15.213 acre tract, the same being the south line of said 6.658 acre tract and the south terminus for Shamrock Court as recorded in Plat Book 81, Page 14 and Official Record 26238108, 761.83 feet to the northeast corner of said 15.213 acre tract, the same being the south terminus of the east right-of-way line for said Shamrock Court, in the west limited access right-of-way line for I-270 as shown on plan FRA-270-7.47N, on file with the Ohio Department of Transportation, and recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 31, witness a'/e" Iron pipe found East at 0.94 feet; Thence with the east line of said 15.213 acre tract and the east line of said "Shamrock II", the same being said west limited access right-of--way line, being a curve to the left, having a central angle of 06° 39' 20", a radius of 7623.36 feet, and an arc length of 885.55 feet, a chord gearing and chord distance of S 07° 48' 29" W, 885.05 feet to :. ``iv ~~ '~ " `''`~-~ 3/" iron rod found marking the southeast comer of said 15.213 acre tract, the same ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ being the northeast comer of said 11.178 acre tract; ~ ~~~ Boundary Description for 16.140 Acres North of Parkwood Place East Side of Emerald Parkway -2- Thence N 87° 55' 51" W, with the south line of said 15.213 acre and 0.930 acre tracts, the same being the north line ofi said 11.178 acre tract, (passing a'/" iron rod found 0.67' North at 722.79 feet) 889.52 feet to the True Point of Beginning, and containing 16.140 acres of land, more or less, as calculated by the above courses. Subject, however, to all legal highways, easements, and restrictions. The above description was prepared by John C. Dodgion, P.S. 8069 on March 11, 2008 and is based on existing records and an actual field survey. A drawing of the above description has been prepared and is made a part hereof. Iron pins set are 3/4' diameter iron pipe, 30" long with plastic cap inscribed "Advanced 7661 ". All references used in this description can be found at the Recorder's Offrce, Franklin County, Ohio, unless noted otherwise. Bearings herein are based on the same as shown on the plat "Emerald Parkway, Parkwood Place, Woemer Temple Road, Rings Road Right-of-Way and Permanent Easements Dedication PIaY' recorded in Plat Book 87, Page 5, in which a portion of the centerline of Parkwood Place bears N 01 ° 51' 26" W. ~l~ ~o-~ ~5R ~ ~- n-lll -A- ~55" 7 2:107-0044-084survey51G.140 desc.doc i3k:SCitiP'1'IUhI YERIFIF:D Dh~N C. R~rict.e. a.~J'.s. p,, n: 3-[~-cB ADVANCED CIVIL DESIGN, INC. ,,.~P.~E of oy•. ~ / oe low = .o': e0G9 0 •'o John C. Dodgion, P.S. 8069 ti ~• ~FSS~ONALS~e,: • O 3~! c~/vo 0.031 ACRE SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, CfI1' OP DUBLIN, LYING IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY N0.3011, BEING PART OF THE 11.178 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DUKE REALTY OHIO BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 200301030002980, (ALL REFERENCES ARE TO 'iTIE RECORDS OF THE RECORDER'S OFFICE, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING, FOR REFERENCE, IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 11.178 ACRE TRACT, AT THE COMMON CORNER OF THE 15.213 AND 0.430 ACRE TRACTS CONVEYED TO DUKF, REALTY OHIO BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 200302260056923, BEING THE SOUTIIWESTERLY CURNER OF RESERVE "A" OF "SIAMROCK II", A SUBDNISION OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 7, AND BEING WTINESSED BY A 1"SOLID IRON PIN FOUND 0.83 FEET iv'ORTH; TIiENCE NORTH 87° 58' 37" WEST, A DISTAI~TCE OF 114.87 FEET, WITH THE LINE COMMON TO SAID 11.178 AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, TO AN IRON PIN SET AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ACROSS SAID I i .l 78 ACRE TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 26° 12' S2" WEST, A DISTAIv'CE OF 10,24 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET; WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A C1~'vTRAL ANGLE OF 87° 28' 41 ", A RADIUS OF 34.50 FEET, AN AKC LENGTH OF 52.67 FEET, AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 69° 5T 12" WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 47.70 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET; NORTH 66° 18' 27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.82 FEET, TO AN IRON PTN SET; WITH ACURVE TO'I'I-IE RIGHT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22° 45' 47", A RADNS OF 24.50 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 9.73 FEET, AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 54° 55' 34" WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 9.67 FEET, TO AN IIZON PIN SET IN THE EASTERLY RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF EMERALD PARKWAY, BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE 0.370 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED'I'O CITY OF DUBLIN IN OFFICIAL RECORD 31969B04; THENCE NORTH 23° 43' 43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.15 FEET, WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE, TO A 3/4 INCH IRON PIPE FOUlr~ AT 'i'His COMMON CURNER OF SAID 11.178, 0.370, AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, BEING A SOUTHEASI~RLY CORNER OF EMERALD PARKWAY AS DEDICATED L1' PLAT BOOK 86, PAGE 24; THENCE SOUTH 87° 58' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 51.87 FEET, WITH THE LINE COMMON TO SAID 11.178 AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, TO THE TRUE POINT' OF BEGINNING, CO'_~I'1'AL\'ING 0.031 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALI, LEGAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF PREVIOL;S RECORD. IRON PINS SET, WHERE INDICATED, ARE IRON PIPES, THIRTEEN SIXTEENTHS {13/16)1NCH INSIDE DIAMETER, THIRTY (30) INCHES LONG WITH A PLASTIC PLUG PLACED IN TIIE TOP BEARING THE INTI'IALS EMHT INC. THE BEARINGS HEREIN ARE BASED ON SOUTH 87° 54' 40" WEST FOR THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RF,SERVE "A" OF "SHAMROCK II", A SUBDNISION OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 7, RECORDF,IL'S~OFd'd~E, FRANKLIN COL'NT'Y, OHIO. TILTON, INC/. ~`~~ DATE HLK:mw23Ap~06 0 031 ac 72390.doc SURVEY OF ACREAGE PARCEL VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY No. 3011 CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ~P L ~~ ~ QP ti / Q Q ~~Q~~~, ~ / f-,~ `~ Q ~ W ~ O.G ~~~ ~ J0 V OOb 0 Q ~Oi C2 Q~~~ ~,~o~ \~ 0'~. /~ 0 i / ~ / i r ' SHAMROCK ll RESERVE 'i4 " DUKE REALTY OH/D P. B. 57, P. 7 0.930 AC. 1. N. 200302260056923 15.213 Ac. " IRON P/PE TPOB RPOB N8758:37"W 174.87' - - ~- - - - f" SOL/0 IRON P/N IN CONCRETE (0.83' N) DUKE REAL TY OH/O 11.178 AC. /. N. 200301030002980 CURIE TABLE CURIE DEL TA RADIUS ARC CH BRG CH Cf 8778'41 " 34.50' S2 ti7' Sti9 57'72 "W 47.70' C? 22 45 47" 24.50' 9.73' N54 55:34 "W 9.67' UNE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE Lf 52672 52"W 10.24' L2 N6ti 78 27"W 3.82' L3 N23 43 43 £ 2215' L 4 58758 37 £ 51.87' • = t. P. FND. / o = t. P. SET I.P. Set are 13/16" 1.0. iron ' pipes with cap inscribed EMHT tNC BASIS OF BEAR/NCS• The Bearings shown hereon ore based on the Ohio State P/one Coordinate Syslem-South Zone os per NA083 (1986 Adiustmen[). Said bearings originated from o lie/d froverse which was referenced to said coordinate system by GPS observations and establish a bearing of Norlh 23' 43' 43" Eost for a portion of the easterly right'of--way line of Emero/d Porkwoy. 60' 0 60' 120' GRAPH/C SCALE (lN FEET) OCCUPA I)ON NOTE.- Occupotion, in genera/, is os shown hereon. SURVEY NO1F• This survey was prepared using documents of record, prior p/ats of survey, and observed evidence /ocoted by an actual re/d survey. ,`,,~~nrtnu„r,r~ .`,gyp. O _ I ~f u ~'I ~ o 0 0 N O ~ O M L M N U II nO r N m ~ O O ^~ 4f C 2 4 ~ GRAPHIC SCALE rn o ,~ ~ as d r ~a (IN FEET) ~ •~ Q , ~ 1 inch =900 R. Q ~ o = m c ~ o = w ? d ~ U ~ m W ~ o ~ Y a L1 a `' °_ U ~ d w PizzuG Lond Co LLC _-_ ~ 273-Otp449 I I i J r f I SITE ' nppcea E a InnovoGon Inc Ap tiad I p 273-007e$8 ,' nnovoGOn Duke Reotty- Ohio i' Inc 273-001594 I /~htond C'a Inc 273- 27}_002454 C0817 I I Ouke Reolly Ohio I I 273-004557 I I Portners .' Boos-Dublin LLC ' I -912214, 273-012215 i I Duke Reotty Ohio i~ I 273-010594 , I I ~ BMt feduol ~ Credit Urnon 273-012125 ~~ -~ - _ -- - ' ' /ashlond Oil Inc -- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ 500 _Doundory _ - - -. - _ I i 27_-002455 uke Reotty Ohio _ - - - ~ - - -+ 273-010645 I 'I I I t ( ~~ ( ~ ~_ I „ ^r ~.~ _ ~ ~ ~ - r I C _.... .. U ~ ~~~ °c~ R~(:~errFr~ - v ~ Q ~ ~ n = 1 S; CIIUC oa >a p > c'.~ c~Qti f uu i ~r uL~~,n :ONG RANGEPLANNING u <n - ~ 3 ` ~ v>.~ u pp OD - QC~O ~ ; o `c? `. "~ f PROPOSED TEXT PLANNED COMMF.RCY~; DISTRICT 12/I 9/.97 Revised 3/18/08 TUTTLF. NORTH E:XTENSION WI±wST OE T-270 AND EAST' OF EMERALD PARKWAY PuRPOSH. The site is approximately l C>.170 acres. (t is located along Emerald Parkway north of the existing Qwest building. The parcel is intended for development as office and office related uses because of its proximity to the freeway, Britton Parkway and the office uses at Tuttle Crossing and Tuttle Crossing North. The following material is provided in response to the Composite Plan contents of the I'CU in the City of Dublin Zoning Code: A. Indicating by schematic plan the general development character of the tract, locations, types of tenants, probable lot size and other development features, including the perimeter landscaping, open space buffers or "no-build" zones and major pedestrian and bicycle routes. Sec attached exhibits. B. The proposed provisions of water, sanitary sewer, industrial waste disposal and surface drainage facilities, including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. The proposed development wilt have water service made available by way of an existing 16" waterline along the west side of Emerald Parkway. Sanitary sewer service is available through an existing 21" sanitary trunk sewer that crosses the site on the north side of Cosgray Ditch and an existing t2" sanitary sewer along the east side of Emerald Parkway. Storm drainage will outlet at the Cosgray ditch. Storm water detention will be provided on site as necessary to comply with Ohio EPA and City of Dublin requirements including post- construction water quality. The storm water requirements for both phases will be met with the installation of the pond along I- 270. It is the intent of the applicant to install the pond in its entirety during the phase I construction. C. The proposed traffic circulation pattern showing public and private streets and other transportations facilities, including their relationship to topography and existing transportation facilities with evidence that the proposed development shall not adversely impact existing facilities. The proposed development will gain access from Emerald Parkway via a full service and right- in/right-out curb cut. (See exhibit B) T1~e right-in/right-out curb cut will be coordinated with the adjacent land owner to provide access to both parcels. D. The proposed schedule of site development and associated facilities, including streets, other transportation facilities, utilities, services and other facilities. Site development will commence after approval of zoning and final development p obtaining a building permit. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~!E3MI~~IED TO COUNCIL f>AAl' ' 3 ~ U~ ~~_~. `~~7~ . _ f-oR MEETING ON ~" - Cl~l r u~• v,.~,"",,u ~~ %~~ LAND USE & LONG RANr,>• ^r auy1NG PROPOSED TEXT E. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public improvements. The proposed site will complement existing freeway oriented corporate users presently within the City of Dublin and Tuttle Crossing North. Surrounding uses include existing oi3ices to the south and cast; existing and proposed industrial warehouses to the north, and proposed commercial uses to the west. F. Evidence drat the applicant bas sufficient control over the land to prepare required land improverents, including street, water, sanitary sewers, waste disposal, surface drainage and other facilities for subdivision development required by the Subdivisions Regulations. The applicant is in contract with the owner and can provide documentation if necessary to show sufficient control over the property. G. Any deed restrictions to be made applicable to the property the subject of the application. N/A per new PCll code requirements. General Development Standards General Intent a It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office and commercial development consistent with Tuttle Crossing, Tuttle Crossing North and Emerald E'arkway. b Mid-rise, signatru'e office buildings will be promoted along freeway frontage. c If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin codifies Ordinances, then the Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Toning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commercial District. d Based on the proposed curb cuts shown on Exhibit B the developer shall provide for a cross access easement when appropriate between the proposed P-C-D area and adjoining office parcels to the south. Signage and Graphics Except as otherwise herein stated: a All signage and graphics shall confornr to the Dublin Sign Code Seciion I53, including but not limited to set back and placement, maximum size, height, color copy restrictions, lighting, landscaping, etc except as noted herein. b In the event of a lot split each building shall be permitted building mounted corporate oi~ice signs along the I-270 frontage. c Ground signs shall not exceed a height of eight feet or a maximum of 50 square feet per sign face. All ground mounted signs shall be of a "monument" design, placed on a masonry base and integrated into a landscape feature. PR~P~SED TEXT d One monument sign will be permitted at the main entry on Emerald Parkway. In the event of a future lot split the applicant may add an additional sign panel onto the monument sign so long as the two sign panels do not exceed the maximum square footage as defined above. e One_jou~t delivery identification sign will be placed at the joint right-in /right-out curb cut on Esmcrald Parkway. The delivery identification sign may contain generic information, including building addresses, and directional arrows, in no case shall this sign identify individual tenants, exceed a height of three feet or a maximum of four square feet per sign face. i' The joint delivery identification sign will be located 8 feet back from the Right of Way as required. however, the sign may be placed adjacent to the properly line between the parcels in an effort to properly service both parcels. 3. Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated (all lighting shall meet Dublin exterior lighting requirements): a External lighting within all subareas shall be cut off type fixtures. b All types of parking, pedestrian and other lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. c All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of black or dark bronze metal. d Landscape and building up lighting from a concealed source shall be permitted. e All fixtures shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. f Alt building illumination shall be from concealed sources. g No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 4. Landscaping: a As many existing trees as possible within the boundary of the site will be preserved (See Tree Protection Plan, Exhibit E). b Any portion of a developed lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be landscaped with lawn as a minimum. c All areas shall be landscaped in accordance with the Dublin Landscape Code and all areas will remain in agriculture or be seeded prior to development. d The landscape treatment for Emerald Parkway shall incorporate standards as shown on Exhibit N. The palette shall include the species shown on Exhibit H. Fences/ Walls: a No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. PR~P~SED TEXT b Wood fencing which is used for screening purposes shall be permitted if fully buffered by landscaping. Utilities: a All utility lines including water supply, sanitary water service, electricity, telephone and gas, and their connections or feeder lines shall be placed underground. Meters, transformers, etc. may be placed above ground, but shall be screened from view. To the extent possible utility line placement will be sensitive to existing vegetation. b All utility connections shall be out of view or screened other than those used for emergency service. c All mechanical equipment and related structures shall be effectively screened from grade level view by a fence, vegetation, or wall of harmonious architectural material and character. d Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof; ground, or buildings, shall be screened to meet Code with material harmonious with the buildings. IGS Parcel Development Standards A1.01 Description and Acreage: 1. 1GS parcel is approximately ~ 16.174 acres. The parcel may contain office uses similar to those uses in Tuttle Crossing. These uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office of major institutional uses. Mid-rise signature office buildings with or without parking structures will be promoted within the site. 2. It is the intent of the applicant to provide a phased development that will accommodate the growth of the corporation over time. Following the rezoning the applicant intends to file an application for final Development Pfan approval for the phase 1 portion of the development. The building layout and placement is designed to allow the corporate user to connect the phase 1 building to the future phase by the use of an atrium or breezeway. The phase l and phase 2 properties are designed to be split in the event that future conditions warrant such actions. Cross access casements would be provided at the time of a property split. 3. Conditional uses as listed in the SO District may be permitted within the site, subject to the conditional use procedure and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 4. Above ground or detached parking garages shall be considered a conditional use and shall be subject to conditional use procedure and Dublin City Council approval. Parking that is beneath the building, underground, and fully enclosed shall be a permitted use. AlA3 Permitted Density 1. The permitted density in this subarea shall not exceed 17,500 gross square feet of building area per net acre of site with surface parking. The density may be increased with parking structures but shall be subject to conditional use and Dublin City Council approvaL* PROPOSED TEXT A1.04 TrafFc and Circulation: 1. ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Emerald Parkway. 2. Curb cuts on Emerald Parkway shall be as shown on Exhibit B. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the Dublin City Engineer. 3. A full service curb cut shall be provided at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. 4. Aright-in/right-out curb cut shall be provided on the northern portion of the Qwest property and shall be connected to this development to allow efficient delivery movement and combined access to the existing Qwest pazcel to the south. A cross access easement will be provided at time of final development plan. 5. An updated traffic study will be provided to the City prior to the Final Development Pian submittal and all required improvements will be agreed upon with the City of Dublin Engineering Department prior to Final Development Pian approval. A1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Parking for all office uses shall be provided at a minimum of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area. 2. In the interest of environmental sensitivity it is the intent of the applicant to reduce the paved azeas by providing smaller parking spaces to accommodate compact cars. Compact car spaces shalt be clearly signed and shall be a minimum of 8'x 16' in dimension. Compact car spaces shall not exceed 20% of the total spaces provided. 3. Loading dock doors wilt be recessed into the architecture of the building to minimize their appearance. To allow efficient thick access the required screening of the loading areas will be achieved through a series of landscaped islands and street treatment along Emerald Parkway as shown on the landscape plans. A1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks off I-270 shall be 100' for buildings and parking; for Emerald Parkway the distance shall be 30' for all pavement areas, 50' for buildings (See Exhibit E 2.0). 2. The setback along the northern property line shall be I S' for pavement and 40' for buildings; for the southern property line the distance shall be 25' for pavement and 35' for buildings 3. In the event of a property split between the two phases the setbacks along the new property line shall be 0' for shared access, and 0' for parking. 4. Buildings along a shared property line shall have a minimum of 50' of separation unless connected with a building enclosure. 5. #Per City of Dublin Code maximum lot coverage shall be 70%. For buildings of 6 stories lot coverage may exceed 70% with conditional use approval for the City of Dublin. PROPOSED TEXT A1.07 Height Requirements: The height of either building shall be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet including parapet. A1.08 Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence (if fully screened by landscaping), or materials consistent with the building materials, or depressing the grade. A1.09 Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened to meet Code with materials harmonious with the building. A1.lU Landscaping: l . All landscaping shall be according to or meet the intent of the City of Dublin toning Code. 2. The applicant plans to utilize the existing tree row and landscape material to meet the intent of the vehicular use screening requirements along the southern property line. The applicant will work with staff at final development plan to supplement the existing tree row with new plant materials as required to meet the intent of the code for required screening. 3. It is the intent of the applicant to utilize: the existing plant material and tree line along the Cosgray ditch to satisfy the perimeter screening requirements between the applicants parcel and the industrial building to the north. The area labeled nn plan as Reserve `A' shall not require screening from the industrial property to the north. 4. In the event of a lot split between the two phases there will be no screening requirements between the two office parcels in an attempt to create a cohesive looking development. 5. Landscaping along Emerald Parkway shall be as shown on Exhibit I that conforms to Emerald Parkway landscape plan. 6. Additional landscaping shall be provided at all full service curb cuts from Emerald Parkway (See Exhibit I). 7. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be graded and seeded, at a minimum. 8. All healthy trees located within the building and pavement setbacks will be preserved if possible. 9. The area to the north of Cosgray Ditch, labeled on the plans as "Reserve A", will remain a natural reserve area. With the completion of Phase I improvements the applicant will clean, seed and maintain this area as a natural meadow. The City of Dublin, at its option, may install bike, pedestrian access or other park elements with an easement to be granted by the applicant. The Applicant may also, at the City's option, dedicate the area labeled as "Reserve A" to the City of Dublin as park space. PROPOSED TEXT 10. l is the intent of the Developer to provide an aesthetic landscape treatment along the 1- 270 frontage. The landscape treatment shall incorporate a combination of plant material, walls, ponds and fountains. The design intent of the landscape treatment shall be to soften the proposed buildings, provide a high quality visual experience from 1-270 and the proposed buildings, and create a corporate identity for the proposed user. '1'0 maintain consistency along I-27U the landscape treatment will incorporate the same or similar plant materials, if available, as the Qwest 27U treatment to the south. While materials will remain the same the arrangement and placement may vary with the addition of the ponds and will complement the building and overall landscape. 11. It is the intent of the applicant to install al] of the proposed pond, I-27U landscape treatments and the Emerald Parkway landscape treatments with the Phase I portion of the development. A1.11 Architecture 1. It is the intent of the applicant to provide high quality architecture and design for the proposed offrce buildings. The buildings will incorporate 4 sided architectural design with natural materials such as brick, stone, and limestone as the primary materials. SIPS may be used as an accent material. Glass color and reflectiveness will be determined based on energy efficiency, to assist in LEED certification. 2. In the event of a future property split between the phase I and phase l l development the architecture of the second building shall be complimentary to the phase 1 building and utilize similar materials. 3. It is the intent of the applicant to pursue a LEEDs designation for the building which may include the use of solar panels, wind turbines, and/or similar energy devises to reduce the dependency on electricity. If included, equipment will be located on the roof of the building and may extend above the parapet. Alternative enerlry sources will be further defined and additional inforn~ation provided, at final development stage. 4. The two buildings as shown in the attached exhibits may be connected in the future through a common atrium or breezeway. Such connection will be designed to be complimentary to the architecture of the building. In the event of a future lot split the buildings may still be connected as described above. ~~ \ \ t ~' i ; I 1 I I I GR4PHiC SCALE I InrP~ ~ II , ~I J I Schoed:nge & Co. ) 273-007012 ) (Vecact Commerdel Lond) I `` Appned Innovation Irc. 273-008177 (Grain /General farm) GAW ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N rri~h, 1~% /~ / /7 1 1 ) ~II 1I I I 1\ ~~~ ~. ' I R k A Properties LN. 200110150237695 6.658 M. ( ~ Source B.M. VBRESET `, ~ Bmsa ppFF•q In Ue oouiheml neodrtll pl wdcol Rood CWval .m [. Bpddmq ~ ) p 1 W-2 S6 ov¢r CoWroY dll<h. just saoU oI bhe 9+bn«Bcn of ~`~ b Sh~xr-Rirs Anal, 19.5 !oet aaat cl tM mnlar5nn, 9 feel emt of ~ ) ~ IM edge o! pawnwel, +.5 1xt «r, or m! loco or Uo quoNrll. \`~_ - .... .. ~ ~ ~ ~ J r I Clev. 910.418 `~ Q I R.M.} 1 - ~ Ax4 or Curs (Iypl `fe . Y ) I NaUOOet comer d IIgM pob hox on Ue ems Wde of Fmerob " ?^ ~ _ / 1 r ~ 1 ! Podrn¢y, eewM 6qM pde Hash d Ue Nlera9an or .mavld Paa.¢y cM Innawllon Oriw. ~'~~ _ '~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 g 1 ~ I Oev. 898.795 E¢s.,nnnl to Cn'urhMa b - ~ . ~ ~• .. _- _~~ Qe IMm Ordo fktlyd' Campoq ¢I 761 _ ro b DA ,~1Q1,'Pp. 848 ~ ~ ~~ - .. /lS r (0 0 ~ ~ B.IA.p 2 ....897•"~`~ 25' Eolem«a d mcaa wdlA V I ~M P.B. sr, Pq. 7 , Ouke Redly Ohlo LN. 200302160056923 15.213 Ac. A.P.N. 213-09159a Slle 703058.90 S.f. 16.tC AC ~- - ~( I i~~2s' Eowmmle a recoro \ ~ I I{'.~/ . In P.B. 57, Pq,) ~~ .~` \ ~~ nopdaey 1 i ` A._ I ~~~ ` far tf+ ~i~~~ n 1~L~~~7%~~ "t)K( 1 1 F •---sue ~ _1 ~ i ,t1 a ~`d~-'il » ?r„ J ~~.... ~ pq z con<~•uN,.6Br,1e~`/ l I. I \~ '''• I~ ;~ ~:f ~' I ~~ ~ ~ ,~ ... ~/ ~ "1 rl, ~`~ ~I ~`. v I I rll1f ;~• ~,1A ............. V :~', I I I~ I~ '; I I I pb ~'~ Ir, kA v I ~ li I (l~ ......., , '',IW y w ~'i...1. !'I~~ ........., I •If ..*- ~~ II A ~~`',, l II,~ i1 { { ~~ ~~'~~ I~li~ . ~ i~ r~ a (; NorUewt comer or :qM Dde hove on me emt Hided [madd I PaMwq, Art Ilgrtl polo aoul'n of eu interaction d Ernavld 1 ~ ~ I Pcnway and unovolnn Drw. tlov, 971.09 i~~'~. ~ R.M. 3 ~~ I 1 5cllroad sy8.e !et In tM noM ede of o W Intl: ooN pae an IM _ t.~i~ ( I I auuln property Yme, 700 feet reel d Ue IPUUeor, propeny // toms J Elav. 996 706 7, 7 ~ I Nde: r 1 1 j By gryn'c pbtlN9 aNy Wo propey .e Ipco;ed m Tae % (Neon 1 ~~ I11 dlbrmin¢c to 5o aulaide 5C0 /«r Boodpla:n), Zon! '%" (Nem of / I 507-year fbbd rlln overage deplhn of leas then 7 fox Pf alth .''J '• ( 1 drdna9e aece :ea lhon 7 aGeera mlq and cram pranded by p ,; lew« from 700-yocr tbod), Ears AE (Box flax e:oralivm - ` _ dntnmdnnd), and Plcodnny orane in Zone AE per iE114 P:uod I'. rcn Rcln Nap Ivr trvr l~.n Corny Ohw c d 1 t rnrted I N N;p Numbe• 340h9CA13AN "i009 hnllm ~ y A r~tbn: Np I I 1' ~ swro}dnq rpe pedolmed to daamme Ire .~ ~ I, ~ I a. r SunYy Neil, I Sle design - D d p be md:ry 'Tanmw6on prepered DY ,1 50' Ec:emerte to Adw ^ed Cn 0 !y /ACSN wn; fish S~rvry reward I ~~ A SWY d ONo of 2/2N/10(A EYHki d ref cerVy to Ihu aon;¢laoeea a I t raad U DB. 2852, ac e / of Uo hau dory pntl eosin art Odomallo. roan an tM 11'~ I Pq. I84 pI r d'ng nm po.erlal d'nr•npar.na Deuce the boarday ~ ey d the furvq oI rotad Amy 6faepox I IM eaidlrvq ~).~4 ~ - I fo. I"tn ehcwn should Dv Moyhl Ic M¢ a.tml on o. Ue n( q I o.oa ao Uvl trry rn be roao;wd ~~I,~~ ~4 ~ I I, ~ 1)A 1 I II / ~ $ ByltnmwrN S `xiatin9 Slam NonMb i ~ I I 98 ~ _sbth9 Storm 5lnxlure fold IJ E+benq Sanltcry S:ru:vre ALL. 1 I "`' Edeunq fire Fydronl ~,~ . Enini r VEC E,d3+ u 6b: 1 P I c [aiat: l l e ///~~~ ( a Evld'•nq Gauro PWhml~ ~/ I /~7~ -~r >w E+hlinq Ebc pd E7U~7~7yUlC{)7'' ~ I Z I I 7 S Wx93q L1«8 'u~rq 1- C I ~ 8 Er41Ng,elep~"I~ OF DUBLIN + ~ LAND USE & ~ ( aQ 8 I " LONG RANGE PLANNING h I I N4 I [ J m d I I 0 o I O I I I \~ I 1 - ... w. rµ v.. I 3920' • 78,23.76' 44 .2T 88;5.55' I I I I ~\II yy//'i'~ :;i!~,rti41~°TED TO CO ]-10' EcaemM7/~~ ('~-, PA~E'-^ non ~~/ffflll C¢bmeia GGGGGG444666111111111111 of ~I `1~l ~l.. C. ICU ~I Dhl0. Ina p «or I M O.N. J1115D12 I I I I I I I I I II STORY 6EA'E R SAL'CNRFS SNU<tun Top d Ceahnp irlerocticae I e9e,B1 rN) I; to d wrier (sy i5' rah ¢I wnl,r• 2 e9r7e (h; 75' raB tr water 1. 12' Full of WaIM 3 898.11 (W) 12' lull al Wckr ff Fdl of water 4 89tl.12 "W Fu.l d Wrier 5 699AI (N I!i Puy of water 6 fl99.28 5) A" FWI a Wobr 7 900.AE (N) 38'cW" euU of WotM (S) 39480' FW d WdM 8 90L42 (tq Ja'=so• ems or waM w) IY Fuu d. wmar i) 31 x53 Foll nl wdM 999.79 (N) t2' Covc. Irv. 99193 S) 12' Cono. Iw. 99n.99 B9B~B9 N' 11' Coat Irv__Avc 10 99374 (N) 31}197" full a Wn!!r (9) 15' Full o' Wc1ar 697.17 (N) +5' Co+c. Irv, 99x.76 990.71 (9) U' Cana Inv. 89.1.98 ' (w~ 15 Coc<. mv. 6'71.66 99991 (n) 15' Coda Inv. 99n 95 _ _ (F7 12' Cox. Inv. 899.11 9o0AB (5) 12' Cert. Mv. 89511 W 12• Conc. Inv. 895.15 899.5) (N) 12' Cana Im. 995.74 n e b. ebtenN in field 1 SANBAR! SMF.R 61RlICTtlP.E9 $WCNIe Too d CaaD mbnegbns 9S9.Jk (N) 8' w,oak Inv. 689.12 (W) 8" Pea>9c Inv. 8319.59 996,97 (N) H' P'ovt:c '.nv. 669.86 S) B' Ptmtk Inv. 888,78 .J 9AD22 (5) 8' Plue6c Inv. Btl7.3C ') 27' PIOe11c :nv. 897,2) 1 A96,30 ([' 71' Cnrc. Irv. M95AA Wj 21' Canc. lnv. 865,9) ~5 995.48 (E) 27' Caa. Irv. 891.79 (W) 21' Con. Inv. 89+!A 6 89457 ,N) .5' Pload¢ nv. BD179 ,F) 2Y cant. mw. em.lD (w) a•.' wmrt Irv. ee1.13 7 99519 (N) 15' PImUt m. 8'L1.d6 {5) 15' Plmup Inv. 99711 r S W 5 o v3 L C ~ Z W 5vo~ x03 z- °6-m as ~~m>~ i D.w 4 O o ~ ~ 3 O F ?°~.<~ ~ s.. d Z FOoN NU ~~ ~~ V W Q F I W od~g - ~b_ ~';- a +~h ,V , w ~5; i >< ,I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N I ~ ~ ~~ _ c '~~~ ~~~~~ r~~~ ~ ~ l I I ~anx (~ ~ L . o ~ Ie ~ - ~ w ~: - ~ ~ I II I I I ~ . _ ._. __ __ 15' Paeyna t a«[~~.Ge;E ~ _ _ 1 _ /~ 1 ¢ ~ ~ ~ I a4 ~ I II _ ~I 4 .. -_ / 9 -T- : ~~ ~ ~' 10' tos ml to OPwmem n ^ S'I ~ _ - ~~~~ 1. ~ IC ~ ~ _ l I ~ - Lyame Omo Fkd6c Canpany m _ ~ ~ ~ Y ' I _~ \ / I I I ' r^., OVr3tM, P¢.8tb ~ _ e0 1 _ ~- --~ ~ _ _ _. -- - _ ._ " " - ~ ~ J `wC ~ U ~ It ~ ~ j ~ I . ~ ~ ~ Ee,~e~ d r~~d ~~ - _~ ~ _ _ -, , ~p i , 1 ~ ~ ~ . ' I tl 11 PA 57. Pq. 7 NMm var;a Eneaent le ine f+Ir --M' [ar ~ r ~ I _ hI I ~I II I I ~~ II I ~. d1L4rn.0 d «d inr~~'7~~~' ~~ {gd~~ I ~\ I ~ lR .I II ~I it ~.~ ~ ~ IN 17980 11179~''I~ i ' ~~p, ~ r Np ~ / 8 I E 50• B o. N I I _ _. ~ _ n 80' [atemant ~ A. D•Iveway \ ~(-1 ~~ _ -~ - ~R8S2~V@ „~ u, v~aq. al weM, ana a ~~~~~ ~ Da a aamaved) ~ I I ~ ~~ J v`~~.~? ~ ~, 'I I:~ },~~~,{h~ ~ +j~ b' i }^~~~ r ~~ I ~I X_ ~ - ~- r ~ --~`(' y' I GRAPHIC 9CAL~~ I ^i ~ j ~ y a Pro ed .~'-: ~ ~ t J l ~(' ~•~ l .'.5,~ 7 y '~} j ._. ti°°d"% ~ I I ~ __-~-_'~ I I g'O O Z ~~ ~' I I~I ( I; ~~}`~.r. ~( `I rle7 I':`e°'tyr 0la ', ~~i / \ yu ~! j_1 '1-f` i t.-ene o~En inesc oa~za Z ~ I ~. ~I Em, 'l ~.+i n~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ y~.6 II_ ~ urrsetsy ~.wam ncolP,~anco-,,arn.~n,l i ~Z ~ C7 I~ I ~ ~~ui ~°" nMO ~rlP y"• y, r v~. ~' ! {.~. ~` ~ 1,~ r ~ l/...~ I• r '~~.. ~ ~ I e t l lo-~:nr np ~ l..owvmn.e„n.tia usmuumualsv q W Z C ~ ~' ~ ~ ..nnu of r aeroa a,° O~R l\rt I fl ~~ ~.-f~ ~y.~ ' ~ ~~~ ~ i I 7 ~. >t ~ rexer cann,MVIM »aocaclx ~ p'v > Q ~~ i Ina L[~~ _ ,/,l I ~ I Or 118e7. Y Q Nln ~ 'S'_I _ 167.D I -n ~. ,1\ /~V J ~' / I~~ ~ ~ ~y. IH Ebaea Om f011PMmrMP:uon j0 (Q F SDhoedirgor & Co ~~ ~ n ~ u9 ~. d sya p Y ~~ s T`1 ~" I n ~ ~ ~ 27J-rA7D1? ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~~ ~' ~« ~ ~ t a,~I ~~~ ~f~ y~!_.n t ~~11~ ~ U ,,,~:~~~ ~ H~~ ~ ~ nwaEan n.r<M,:e~eE W p Year; Commercial _ond ~I 5~~q ~n~ ! ~~- r! sk.d1 - , ~,,,~ ~j ~. ,,..~"_'.) ~~ I .nl,oee u.uoee ~ fl- Q h ( ) ta~.rr. I lia 1 `,EIY ~ - ~ ael -~ a y _ ~_; us n' Gs ~a/ /-`~ - __ _ '' '~N~' .I '~_ J z ra er o ~ a oau~. onP al ,d ~ 1 8. ° 9 F0) N_. ~.: 1" ~ v ~ ~t ~ li 7~ Q1o-.x)71 a- ~ ~ _ j 1-~ (IZ ~ _ 7800 (~j ~ - ~ ~. ~ ~~.-~'~. ' r` Gm,OWOU an InMSI N 1I ~_ ~1 9, :~:. r9 ~ ar x '. sr+a o p' [c) ._ 5~ 1 d hmM lfaasr rrAC fn W I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 7.0 I :~- _ ~t _ __ 1 ~ I ~~e ~ i ~ W A( I IR I~ I ~I I ,/ ` ~°~ ~'-~s 3.0~(Ij'Sp O D Fo) ~ l~rx~ r._~ (~~ 0 8' ) _` A _ _ I' I ~~ euaormYdnrea IaAC ntnarl _ __ ''~~ ' ~I i Nly Pwmn Me ONAC QMOMtfI j~J ~ _ -_.I. ~ ` _ ~a ~` .~.~) ~ ~ ~•~ - 16$ f \ l ~ ._\ I I" ' C taulNW,b~Ara ee}.1E I15,ANDi) ~ ,f 740' I~ I - II `~ ~ ~_" ^~~'~3po / a'o ~ \ I j ) ~ ~ y p'~D b"r~ {- `\ i,.~3p ~ `17.0'(~Jt~Ca ,` _ / ,~.h §w I I ~ I F einuGneEMrAyrRMM. Mll11\ o~or caorl 3 Sp --=DO o p. YYDep (It o ~ ~ ` ~ 0 u.~,a.,owueelrm~wn I ow m. I I ~'~_i67:0' (18 ~ _ Eo~ -~- $c~o~p~•~ H0 I c ~ q (P E5'R _ I,y~."~S-o 09`~ ; ~ 2a.0,.. _r I. Ip~'D•(7~ ~~ .e•" J ~ ~.. ~ ~ 0 v..nmur.atrweomw n7xl ,uuc0unra;rt I ~~ ~ ~~._ha SOe 0 F = ~_Nsa e ~ --~~p~e~ _! ~ I I 1 (+ j~ mceamvArem:N~a,+u earuosl•w::, ~ I - l ( ~ "~~. w -Proposed ~ I W+wta^uWUP,u, niP4'N ~NNO I I I ~.`". O ~ i • a,D•a b S:dewolA 1 I. ulrEnmlmso«.rm.hxl vH VA7j0NDRIV `~ I o Js'R } '~ of ~ r.+rere.,EP•.rls,w<r eo m f (g0.) ~ g ~~ Is3o' (IS w . ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ I ~ rmwmwrEPer.+r r«n le F ~ ~ O '^ -`SPa 0 p~~, ' d 14 EW„IOl6rorl (CUpll a m ~``~ I r~ NJ, 3A r'-II70'(r1$ y,a c Y ~ I, 4~.v.~ ~ rlDmrM kw,~roll y W ~" ~_ '- ~1 r ' -)- Pro ro BWkI ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 11 I. ~ xrin+w coer.,vrwaa nl ,.. S7TOB'S5'~ ~'N7 ..,I ~ p ~ Is.D' rs~ttp°SE.~ I ~ I 1' ~ II .I I E,.nuryaPn_ r. 8.1T ,J I?rP. ~~"x~~~~'')) aum,r.~crraep,c., w4uepLr~trryaga~a0ru5p. 1 ~ ' ~• ~ -~ 1 10'~ ~ f ~ O o, (f,dy SPdnAlpp) i (+) ~ ~ ~ ~~ O V 1 ~ ~0 a, rJ Is.o' (z sw _.' rlvaarasp,r, n 7" Fo 4 I nweinrtataalule y = \ s :P f II } PNIAIOa 12R.C SD' [are m.r al j to'a \ ,0 9 ay 7s.a' !' Applied InnovOfion Inc. ~ as n8 ~, ~I ~ ~ (g ~Eo~FUO - 'Jeq'~ ~ ~ '' ~ ~ cAr,ewgrnr laa«Dr 273-008117 pal ~ raP &-r \ ~ ~ flaa N sra 'Y i -~ II AmEr r.Ac ~. 30'R o a,. ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' DarM (Groin / Ganer0l Farm) ~ ~ % ~.~ ;9,E~"oo 0 9' EeZ - ~ ~+' 1 CAW ~ / Q / ud' ~ ` ~ °, -770 ~B Spo ,g Placard/ I }I 1 ~ ~IO ~ al,rm rapae.we: ooeACwDl7en ~- II I / !! -0'' Oo• ~0 r~ ..09'Ea) n ! Pbra- .; ) 1 ~ ~(~ J Prmn.uu alaxclllr,lelDrl J ,~I I ,f '.. B•/) r JryrO ~ 'y l____-"~ 1 I` I TaYMIMN/MMr aIIAC WNIOEV) Q ( p0~ ~j%`0 ~ ~ _ ~ !eC ~C -_31L! '.,I IIk @ Q / I I~.p~ p•~ m rf . ~ ~~ .,, ~ I _ I I ~ I ~ swnruraewl.+.mw+e'.arl o:mMmvoorl I s0 / I/I/ ye ~ /ydS' ~ Y Jna~gS~AOr, wI 5U o9 0l 44-- ~ - 19 7 iWlarGrlEPKr MIMeWM'N1FI aJU I.CIII tCe r. r1 > S I ~a~ ~ SI6FI~0.+ ~.~ * f°J ~ l l 7D%I ,OQ- ni ° Q, ~ ~ ~'^)I ,I * ~ of l ). P, IJ105 PP,n50~A.' IFICe+n'errMNa-HevY1 1/EAC r7Ele/er, © . a7 I ttr~I ~~1~ ~ ~~p~F ~8 I h ('7R t )If ~o ,7 ~ ~ ~ ~~ I" ~ r rbc...~ewnrmvela a+o.,wa.E ~P.rar1 ~• ~ 7a 4xI _ ,~ I 09'a Stv n I b I o '~ ~~/ /~•r 1 rN Caaaea5 ,EP1,ml nr H/ n ~ tl ~ ~I~) 1 80.Oi(IO SPa 0 9 Ea) 3'R \~F\ i ^1 I I -. ~d ~ ~ pp I i ~ 1 • ) - `~ 900' (10 spP o 8 Ea) n a "~" ~ J II 5. 39 20' Dotr: rrn.aMapEplrallraleen / g ~y ~~. 1a80_(t4 5pp 0 9 Ea) 117.0' (U SPA 0 8' Ea) r- --- o' ' ', ; arw ewerTw,AO el Yse 8'08'49' J ' I - --~--+ `"-----_~_ lu.D' (se syo 0 9 Eo1~ ~ Tro '~. I~I {{-~ I:JR - 7Bfr3.JB' Aa Pwkt~9 aP«r a I9 ro-9 unkrr ou,enae ~aww,~rolo,rs R~ 1482.OD' ~ ~ I ~~ I I ~ I~ I I I III I r ~ I I, T 445.2T . 4 led. ~r fvwcrurpalnel x T r 105.54' II ~ I ~' ~ ~ I i (- -I ~_ I I I I I £~ I I I ~ 1 ~ ~ ra_ ~ ~ ~ I~ L 88$.55' rannetywwlrrooer bo L r 210.73% ~ ~ I 11 I I _ AI mmenriana prvel ae la lace or <ure. ~ ~ 1 . 1 108ip (12 Spo OD' Eo I I I Prm:e I I I II~ 1+ } I I NI propred eden W are 5 elde unpe otnaroira >:'°"'yaowy¢peeel)~ryprPap+anoer,aroer eleuu,m IW Fawn m to Co'weR. /\ ~-. ) 108,0' 19 _ Pmad, ol.duaSe+oingar 00 ~' I I - ~ __ ( Spo 0 9 Eo) ~ I P'WVOedI Rufa, I e sau~., on. F,INOa 1900' ha spa a e. Eo -"-~ --- /5q 14e0' (fE sPa o 9' E,)-_ l " ~0 I I O uI emrPPaa adre~ae to ~ m px c~Fy or Duran "~""°~t e eamnarry or ears nn ~lll` ~p '~^ L-- ) hs4o' (14 Spo 0 9' Eo) & oRwa sr, SIDD, Pq Tta I ~; '/7.(a ~ I ~ -------.._ _ 1JSp (f5 Spe 0 9' fa r~ I Std. On W]1- and ropun Im «fian, // ' / ! ' i /pa ' I I , I I I - ?T.D' ~ - -~. - ~o - (rah' EDrhula) _ , , 9~ ~ ~ P PwAtF,LRa,.TIJU - a I_ rr_a I I I r.w,N. - swAc I r / J ,~~ ` ~sD I ,. ~. ~ ~ i I ~ i ~0 1, I sasEYEr Ss'.[eeemem Ip tn. r ( t o.0' (u spa a 9' Ee ~ ' ~ ' I ~ II ~ I I Cllr of (lub'b, Wm e~ ~ ~~ 0 9' Fo) ~«~ ) _ t28,0_(f1 ~ I I ~ ~ I I ' spa 0 9' Ea) ~ usnawoA,r. n«ecr o a w y ~ --- - _-~ _ s15,,0 1! ,) ~~ + + I I hrnr a»ser rru - 7(xrw70500.8751 7 I ~ y '8 ~ 90D' (t0 Spo 0 9_Ea) 1 _ 115.0' (IS 5Pa 0 9' Co) ~ ( Spp 0 8 F • (.~ I 1 ~~ I ~ / / {. - ~ ~- .-~ ~ ~ I i I I _ tJ5.0' (15 s9a 0 9' [a) ~ 6 tD' tawa.r+ to Cawarno II • rr h ~l' I I ICas of Ohio, '+,r'. a rttoN I 0am+afaWArce DNAL WAatr7 Dukc RODI Ohio I ~~~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I~ I I' ~ ;' 9 ~ •~ I~ ~ .~ m o.a. sen5012 s I V 200302260056923 ~ ~ (~ sca 1.; , '~ ~- ~ ~ I _;_ ~_ 1 ~ I ! i ~ -~ ~ i I ~ 3 I ~ .I i ~ ~ Na rrswn»Awsr YprNM~. lrr Aa llll lpr6 fl N 0.930 Ae. ~ --- _ ~ I J ~ I I I ~ - I ~ Dba ~ ~ -, ~' ~ ~~ ~ lxm0recpu.Nelawu~a.ryvl o.wAC aeweri m 9 Ca ~ 90,0' (10 Spo 0 9 Eo) I iJ5.0' (t8 ~ ~ ' ~ I•~' .~ ~y. AP.N. 273-004557 ~ - ~ ---~ -. _ Spe 0 B' Eo) i17.0' t3 N // I 7 / // -`•-1510 (t•`>ka 09 Eo) "-.. -_- _ ( 5w 09 Ee1_ _ 'D• ._. III I I ~. lnmanmavla A,ePpar:nyal aleacn«naN I A -'- _ _ J87.0' (,BSpa 0 P' Eo) tI7,0' .R I ) 7 /" I O - l,mA al Prapord Ae,6n1-q G I / bar - -'-_i- _ __. ___- `(~J SDD O- Ea `.~I ~ II I I - T ) _ pR ~ .~~ i . l'eNd al PMr 2 m.cmapeAnra:pary E»AE neeonsrl i~ I / I - - -.- I ~r ..- - :_ - -_ RI I - - _ ~_pwhWp SeIE«r __ _. . _ -~~~ :I~ I I ~~ I , 3e^~NE?^_wF~,!~n9 / (. ~ ~ .9 -' _ I 75 Pa enl S ,Dock I n,esum.ncrml5uwl m I, I _ ~ 58T55'S1 E xe-1 a.y~ rt ~;':I~ 1r ~' 7y 'r i .. ~~ (~ GRAPHIC SCALE rno-wmc.rN~ts~ws n $` ~ I II: ~l 166.74 --t;' ~ ~~x..:'1~,,,.~e~l -~r?..•. 7 NBT55511Y f • ~ r ~ ':, I ~ ,. I .,m.eEpw,wrrs D ~o a Er J~ - _ « _ _ Er~,l a Pmca to aamatn ~r722.79 ti."~~'~"5~.~,-• .,/',J 1 I 1 A i a. `.-.~ I ~ I 7~ e~pw~, r.we nl 8 - - - F n,.C,'9":, _`C kk~~ .~ I I~ rr i (. ._ - - - .° __ _ ~ `' [ -- i --1 nnermnew7erlu,Ma~eaNp9Ma.tr~.ON`.?rJ~NINt a I~ n P~ _/ lr,iDnnOn RcOninnDillooa~ ~ ~~ ~ •~ ~ ~~ t_.7 ~ ~.r I f _ - -_ - _'t v I I ~-.vr I ~rarDwmndpun tr ., / / ~ /~ L _ I I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ Exialvq Oul&q ~ ) I 0 ( / / / / _ ~ I ~ ' N LI I I __~~ ~~~~ _ ~ C~ ~_--~ ~ ~ ; ~ /Q ~ ~ 1 - v ~ w -, w. I- I I ~ '- -' -- _ _ mrnt AtbacF ~'~ ~ 7p~ f/~ yQ \ a.i 'I I I ~ I~ y 10 Ccu ,I f4 Cm:nrDDe k D - .~. _ , ~i~_ - ~ ' 1 _Q `F / / -} _ __ ~ I ~ 1 I I ~ --. .:wihf Dnu Ebtln: Ea^purr !` __ ___ _ _ - '- !! _ ~ / I I 1 !0' BmIdri _ / ~ it I ~ I I, I~ I ra ~n 09"3p0S-Pq_fe/4m_a l _ ~ ~ y~~ ~~ ~0dr~0~ira~~~4 ~.! ~~._- ~ ~i ( ~I j ~ I ~ ~ 75' Fawmmm of mcnrd ~ ~ ~1Dat~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ x n " '1 ~~ in P,B 57. P . 7 ~ _ ei °f J11 3 W Ib VnM EDwmenl ID IM Cly I; q DI UuNln. of r.caa m )~5'~~C~nso ~~~ Tr _ `' /~~~ $I I I ~ I / .I. I Q ( I 1 II I ~,.. I.W110g50 III78J "V.9 \ "~ I ~p 1 e ! ) / / 1 9 I _ ~ ~ ~3 trim: ^q Oweot -~ - - 0 1 d m r~cam Ur ve.ay f / ~ ~1-} -~ ` k ,__ Se pe ~~I (io Ba Ramoved) ~. y ~ ~~ ~ -. ~ ~~ ~ ~.~„ _ ~ e rve q rn. ,~~,. DI ovDhn. ~ DI ~, ~ ~•~ ~ I ,wad .n O.A. 250YA101 r __ I L ' ~~ '~ ~ X '~ _ ~!~ I ~ I `~i4'~,rl 1 ~~ `1~--7~ .,j~'~ ~ 1 .~ - - - ~~ >. `- --~ _ ~` ~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ p (gyp o __ _ _ ' 19~ t,ti~t' I~ I r -~ i ~ ~'~. r!. , . y, ~ ' ,~. ' 1 ~i' I , . ikolu,y l~-~ ', 1 tl ~ ~ I @I ~' 1 ~ i : ~7 J ti~~ 7co,q ~+cn ~F'h.,f ^ 1 . ~ F~ ' -'` { i~ I ~ a c ~ Z a _ I I r , ) ~ o / ~ 1.1 / ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~yo '~~~, 1 ~1- I I ' ,, l ~ ,. ~ 111 I ~I I ~ ~~ ~I ~, I ~ ~ ~ ~~C„~ ~ nl l InD p ~ .~ ;`~ f ~,~i~ i^" a ~ ~ ~ ) ~>Z , ~i t - l~ k.llo r-~D - ~ w Z ¢ ? t0 0l ae t~„ I /~=-~ A r~l` ~ -. -~k~~ it 1' / ~ I " I ~^ ~ ~ <rD~°q_n+aoad~„rnRO. ~a~~ ~ /1 i'/ ~ :1 ~'-~._._ ~~ \ \~s Id I DB(~ZaS). z D ~ < < I IE ~rh~~, r~»~. ~~ I ~ ; G ~ ~ o r~ ~_hnr ,~ ,, v i1 ~ .~~ ~ ~ o ~ w n C.Imrneracl Lard ~ ~ ~ t U Emrmtll 1 ihn IIDIY DI - ~ '~`~ o.D,~. nh I dD a ~~n I ~~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ ~' -__`- ._ Lr,,~ .a / 2 w O O I'. 2J0+0!~o!a0a81J1 ~ a m j I ~ i ` _ ,~ 7 /~_, / I ^ N U q ~~ ~ I f~ " If ~ ~ o " c7 ~, (-y- ~. 1 DID 'E D '/ ~ I ~ , Q ,/ ~ ~ ~' -, i i I ~ Y- _ _ _ I ~ I "', 1 I~ ~NNOy ~~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I" Sunnv Neta: ~ m =uwo an~Dn la mna _ _ f - ATIONpRIVFtRO,)' -- i ~ ~ ~ I F I I rt< eemr,, 1 m, d v'vr.'xD j ~ c F .y ~ - - suslaDV ~ ~ Aaa: d Civq 0»gn Ain/A su d r ~..d ' ~-~ Woo r ~ a: I`. ~ 2(18/P005. EW &1 do nol c roly to Ih comW 1 D B~on~gAna la,lw D; m ~ I ( i ~ ~ I ~ r ~ I a:crccy n! ,F by nd y and « e e t I to tl ro IM ~ n.avsr p~AV I .~ I $ I' I - I i pane, nNUrt 9 ry yryt id Doe epa ewm Dnl « k Dw do7 W D aumy aril v.e avnay u. t wrd Ay Ower~ncrom Li O,e enWp a 1 + t~.'D,mctlD' ah,.n ahn~d DO brDUgM ID V`D DIIon110n D/ I1n Wa~11D fDaW'n Ana. Dfi6nOQM1,6118 F1 S7T06'S5 ~ ~" :~ ~!-_. ~ ~ i ~ I )I + ~ ewnnr me ~,nDl o~.ey <D~ r. e,ol~me. Pawm.mARr. mtangr+e.au:rl 8.1T ~ I ~ I tmuew•vaaaea r:mc tzoc ams.! 1 \ I )_ I I / Oba4, I ~ ` I II OI ~( I rmnx r.~awsoamniwval~oa 0+x1 owau RACe=r~ I. ~ ~VJ Nola: ~ I na ~~ h "+r. ~ ~ \ `` ~ IJ ~ I By e'arlc pletunq o y uee Dnoetr n ~oaDmD o- Zone a Ikem lauwcuav~wan tnatxt r.necnc,.re~.-.-1 11 I dotornlneC o be b t.dv 500 y I adpl 1) lane '%' (dear N A EI''dhvo--t rr Inc ~-~<.J ~: ::8•eWb, 'h/. 5~'0: - __J I ,D'N ` I /1 I 541,_y<vr eow t. m ~Plh Ila IhD, l~neor r~ a~nwrmeworweeaPmidD ,a !, l:' dM nD.e ttevm m N 1 o ~ b D~d vroD. t tied IqA 3arJ+u 9+ny&A+ool z / kaeee Irani q yet IIxE) Z o rE (~ p IIDOC eovD•.vne .lu 000'!~i '- ~ Ww A~ YJ'N \ ` ' ~ re e~ IF,1 \ .1 II determL d) ' Elo A y • o I l u Ar. per F!W hood Inrecnpmo ansl°wunl (G[O n ~ CAwral farm) Q / ~ ~ ~ J ~` W, _ ) ~. ` r r .~ y 1 n.e_ranu N to W D . f o~Klt L .ly Onlo aM Inccryo'oted nip ha KCap p•aalawhw7 e Y ~ / ~~ N t~ ~ F dyeDad /~ ~ ~ I ~,~I ~ Nea:. 4uP N Ae• 38019001JIN 1067 Pra`ankmry ReJrt on'. Nn Dmnw Wweamiu3apel a 1 ( ! pl Op. Aj C F,.r -.' `~.~! I(~ I lak e..nroyl~^; 4De peAmmed to EotDmwne Uew :one. wy'.F SO+orsiw+wl Y ./ .. 1~ oAJ _ ye. ~ ~ I \ emarv.,,.S~naw v Q~ f I ~ ~ ~ -00- fq°o o ~ ~ )ar urc :ar ~ ~ I" I tGDn«upsf . vroaaa MD ~ / QQ I ~ I I ,120, O,AB f\ /~ .......e. ~, r. ~ - - --' -- ~ I i w.wo.nasaea ~ I ~lI p° 81 ~/, V ~ mow, ~ F0l°oV S "~ b r I I 10' k 5' Fuwmenl to ComnO~n a~tltlAt6]emmlmD~E_RrN_ti!M~ p ) Rg/ o cY rfi [~'a ~ \ °Poo~ ^I ? i`Vj ~ i ~ a sm,ln.m orgD ENclnc Conporq awaucDmrwsorm W 1 ~II ~I ~ ~I~ h0 _ ~~ / \ y q `0a h ^ ~ - - + I DI rwad v~ D.B. ]105. h0 6d8 WnM+cbAecn aaD - - ~:/ ,q 03 ly,~8~ I I `/~ ~Ir ~ I ~ I~/ I ~~ 9/r o~ ~I,l ~AOD tlD so, a a' Eo) ~ '~ - ~% r l ~ v r a5a (:) soa o q' rDl uzD' (I] soo o a' EO) "' ° ' D ul~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~" e - ~ ~~; I ~ ~ ~ i s. 39'20' '. Nohe: .. ~s. B'08'49'~(~ / -- -' h - i1.o + I I _ N,. "~R = 76 3.78' R > 1482.00' 77 'J ~ I I ~ c Se 0 9' Eo)-_ 1>_0 °~ T 44~.2T J i I I r I ~ I~~ I 1 Iwlb ~Oq epacw qro IB long uOWaw DlMrnlva 4 T = 105.54' ~ ~ f ~ - - 1 - ~ ~~- ~ '• _ _I {°, ~i ~ I I ~ ~aa., ~ I I L 885.55' I L 210 73% / ~ /rp a. ^ I ~ __- ! l ~ _ 1 ~ _ _ ~ ~F All Amanebnr giveI(~ m to (ooe of curb. 00 l..~ 1 ff( _ //~` 4 105.0 '(IQ SPO09'Fa) 100.0`(11 SAO~09 ED i I l ~ I nr ~Ahcml I I II }T I All propDeed eiao.plke an S',dde unlW dhen a< -.~ I ) i i DDOfod BD bn + no1M. l 0nio k 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'i90.0' (10 - -' 1' AI _ 11{.0' 18 ~ { p [, r I e.r•d L.: 7 I _ SPO 0 9' Eo) 110.0' It I- ~ SpD 0 9' Ea) 1 Sony i OB, Pq 7'A kD ~ I ---__ IJDD ID All enUDnro DriDl am to hn nn ,e C I f.iM'r I ~/ % ~ I I I I I ~ _ 1 sy, a p• EDl _ w~ ~ ~ sld. D«q. wa 1-~5 Dad •ac,D npa- an. 1~/ ~/ ~~ r ~ ~ g~~ i I ~ L~ ~ I~ I ~I~ I I ~ iyp ~ ~ I I I ~ l ~ ou~ (F"N SPInLed) ~' 1: ~ I~ y ~ _ / / ~_ I I laD - ~ ~ ; ~ ~ I ~ c ~ IM r 7~` Cno , ~ ~~~~ u vsEo) ~_ 1150 x(11 svD~o o~ ED) ~_ Iuo (1{ slpalol4'EO) ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ II + I i tN- / 900' (ID Spa o 9_Eo) i35.C ~ "-- ~ SAD 0 9' EDJ - * I ~ y _ -- -~ -_~ IJS,O' (15 Spo 0 9' Cp - ~ -to' Eowmml to Celwndo ~~~ ~ -~~~~,.. ~ ; I ~ l ~ ~ I l ~ I - _~_ ~ ~ CDa DI Otrq, 5x- M ucad ~ ..ukO Rcalty Ohio ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I I a JA 3 tl ~ In OA 3,115817 I, I! 100302260056923- _~ 170 ~,~, -• i 'I ~~ i ~~ I T I~ I i, I i ~ ~ + ,~ H 0.930 Aa ~, j3 -~ - ~~ ~ ~ I I I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I ~ ;. ~~ I~B ~ ~ ~I ` ~: ~..' D ED : _'b~ hD s~D a o' Eo) ISSO' is ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ A.P.N. 27J-004557 / -- . • _ _ ( SAO 0 8 Eo) ` 117.0 (h] SpD 0 0 ED) qya ~d I~ / / / _'_'153D 17 ) '- I '. ! ~ ~ ^I', O ~ _. _- Ilmitm DI PropoxD 4ezCirq Y // ~ .a ( SpD 0 )~ Eo _ - _ ,761_D' (18 SAO 0 9' ED) _ __ X117 D' 1J ~A .. I I ~ / / / / C_ ` '' '-_-. ~ ~ - _ SDe 09 _ __I 10A 'pr eee. llmlb of Plww 2 ( ED) 1r / ~ _ _ S8T_SS)51 E ~ k1~.1 : r ; S `t - - - - 1~ P2emint_Sab <- - - - -I ~ I 1' ~ f ., ~ ~~, ~ ~ In GRAPNICSCALE I D ~r ~, ~~~o _ 186.74'. --~"''r~~"- ~r-~::,' ...~I,/4'o.l,t,l~~:ri-./~1.`, ki /`~' ~~H8T55'5114~ I {~~.h ~,~ I I I I Ar~il,~OnnadCrow ~ ~// _- _ ~ ~-Civ6'uCq"r'aecero~~aon,LT~'?-- - 722,79% ~ h 4,I ~ ~ I '~. ADD1fe DINItoy' !~\ ,. ~ __ _ _ ~ - - 1, '<., ~ m I ~ ' o +w "~.~~~`~. h ~~ ~._ _ - - - -: I r Duke Really Ohro ~ ~ - - - ~._ i lu,reer 1 ~ /I _- - LN. 200J010J0002980 ._ l ~ ~.GNtI - _ t ,u.y,a I a ~.~.~;~ , , J _ . ,,.179 ~. ~ ~ P~ U- - ; _~ - _l ~ I ~ I I .f~l ~~.~ ~~ I ~ ~~~ L_ I I ~ I ~ O I `'' ` • "g o~ ' i ~~ I - - a ,n I.I ~ 1 I ~ )) '--, '~ Y ' f ~' 11 ~,~ ~, `{ ` --, -- ~ ~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ III '~ .I~,--~,: '<i e --- -~ _ 261.83 -- --- --I '- ~~ ~, ~ I, .I ~~~ ~ ~~~d~ ~ _ ' - --~ ~ Q ~, III ;.- ,, ~ ~~ ~:~--_ , ~_ __ , - --~_ __ _ __ ~i~ ~~ del l , ... ~_ ~... -- I ~ ~ ~ - don , nce ~ Lr~ f I ~ z-6~ tree Prone _. ~ ~ I 1 ,p I _ .I. i` .~ r~ ••• ~• ~~ ~ ~ - V\II ~ ,III h • 1'~ ~ -,/ ~~. ~ ~ • ~,,,,, y stay-~' ,.~ . 'r ~ ~ ~ 1 a I~ 1 ~: I, ~ i ~' `J , I ~ ,, , - ~~` / '~ ~ ~,ann~~ ~ ~~i~' ~.j l ~ GRAPHIC SCALE I I~I~I d ~ i' ~r '` f- r ~ it ~ - ~ '~6wv~l~ ~'°~-.~' _ - _..~ 'fl ! t:l: ~ +~ ~ N w ~. ~ I !.' ~ ~ ~~~71 _,'~~~ I ~ Y~ r "'.•"`y( ~?! ^~ ` I, Mln~~ - _ t.. ~_,~, '~•7" ~--I~ ,- I~1 I. I I•v ru:,i :, ~ Q \ l J i"M'-••.~, ~. ''~..: ~ 't00,Ytp noadplaN ( ~ 1 I z ~ >~ 1 ( d ~ I.. h~ ~~\..~ rro ~~:'~1~1 ~' `r / 1 .. 1~+~,~."~., --~.. ~ ~ ~, ~' + ~ , ~ ~ 1~ I ~ d ~ z I •: III ~ ~ 11 ~ I~ ~ ;~ ~'. ~~ ~olra-an E, ~i ~~ ~. I i) ~~I ~ -~'_ ! ~ } T ,°i ~ ' ~ ~ . ~'I~ I I 4 2 ~ ?~ ~ •~ 1 I I:~:'I( C~ ~~~ fin, c~ i~«.... 1` r` ~--~ ~...e, ,~.i y j'~ ~'~ ~ ~,I I owl Q~ Salwedingpr & Co. t :' ~ L~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~% r 10n~._-,.~, ~12 .. I - - \R stredm 6aun t~~,~ -4`_ ~ /~I / 1~~ 1 `"-"-~~`` _.l i r ~ ~ I ~-,~ ~ - p ~ ~Z 273-007012 •. I I i v i. t ~ ~ cX n» ~'~`, ~ ` ~ 251'" o.a:y~ ~``--~ . ' ':~C-~...1, - ` I t "yi "~T,ylt~` ,Q~'~ I I ~ ~ fp i r zi ~a I y ~~~~ "`~_' ~ ~~ ~ >` CI (Vacant Cpmmeruol land) •• III t ~ ~ I, ~ •, ; „` _~~` ._ °, + - ~ w ~Z ~/~ ' d ~ ((III ~! \ '<< , "~ ~ > o I '. ~ I ~ ~•: 1~ ~ I ~ I 'I = ~ ~ 0 1 i~ls~sYd~.o ostz ~~ \~.. ~r~ ~,~~ ~c ~ ,.~ I rann O ~ o.a „~~ d ~ I • ~ ~ j • ~ I ~ 1 i 41 M1~ ~q~ ~ I ~ ~- ~~la IS Srm o ay~x :~ ~ rly_ ~,_~ ~ ~ I ~ Bnrrceman e- U Q~ I H ; -9 I I I. ~ .I I ate. _ _ e F Hf'~ F ~ 1 ~S ErifCnp 51orm V.nh~. (n W I°,I I ~tt~.. t,~ it ' d f r~ - --~-, `C ~ x .u ~-~ ~ ~~<" ~_~ r 5: I f~ ~ t .I' ~ Rio Emrgseorx I I .. f i ~~~I I ~ I• I ~ ~ ~ r~ a .,1 la ~ ~.. ~~- ~---,eM .. ~~ ;~ E ~ - ' ~~~ I (/ _ ~ I ~ d m~ [Icwp soul - .,r. ~ w I$: j L ~ ~;' E ~ ---.; .p `t f± ~ I ~ ~ l I ro r lnpwolrri, ` ~ ~> .wed -~=-~.:_ ~ - ~, F ~_~- I ~ ~ I F~ueLL9 Sb, I ~ _~, ~ i I Ij a ~.,,L~ I,el ~ ~-,, `. ~ ~ - - . J Y -. - _ ~~~. .I r' I .. EzislP,p light p ~. x 1 ~ ! ,~ I f t \ R g aJ' ~ '> ~--1_ ' i 1 ~ I n Etleh~q ElecU tL.h , ~ ~-~ 1- ~1 ~~ d I F 0 ~ ~ v<r.F ^~ 1N J.•~._ ~ _ ~ I• \\F _ ~~ _ I ~ Eehlirtg nlalNC Vm•.c N V N o I ~: I \~. - 0 ATIO a 1; ," •~• I ~ ~ - `p ~ PaoIAI ~ '/ / I B FxfelMg tekpnan• ucm~i. RIyFl60) , ~~ I ~ ~ I 1 II~ ~ " ~ ~ I ~ I' ~ I ~ r 1I ll~ j ~ Itiv I ~. iI i~ k ~ 8~11`l ~ r I f ~ t;mnf of vmm s U ~ - 11 I gpl - I I~' \ y FIOOE NeaNr~ F 1 ]'N1-rmr ?..e Faod E ~o~. an 1 11 ~ K~ ~ ~~ ~ roll ' I I 2 ~" r 1 I•~ 11 ~fy~ ~J\9 'fir ~ pA~S,bq Sl~ ~ •~I I `+/ I I ~ X I r- ` W ~•f.' !•~ S7T0~' "~•,~ ~.. ~ I ` 3 rr.sa2ao I ~ 1 ~~! ~ l+~ J \ l l .~, ~~~ ~ 11 . °6 ~ 4•, ~ ffuNY S+A"Nea) d 1„,y~~~~ r 1 d n ~ ~ ~ k ~ `066 :~. a,d ;I. ~ ,.1 t +'r~n~ ~I r.i~)t+ I I -^~a 1 r~{ .; Bu 2r 0 / _ ~' ai '~r 2~~+ ~~ ~ ti9~ 15 I)~ t1 It ~` ,\~~ 1 , ua. j ~ ~ ~~f~I ~~ ~ I d d nppoed mnowNon Inc. I ~ ~ Y ~I ~ u~ ~ ~ ~. ~ A'v=~,- =;,,221,_ ~ I ~-~ "'`1 I r F~ ;_ 273-008177 ~.,~~m ~ ~ et~ wcl ~ ^ '~. F ~ ~. ~. '. '~ m» .... ... _.~_ y I -~ ~ 4 (Groin / Control Farml I •`I ~; /j/~ ~I /I ~~L~ ~ ~ _w ~~ '~ ~ ~ ',~\ r' I I 0 CAW +,T/ ~ ~,~~ ~1 I l ~'~~ ~~~ ~ ~v' °o ~ e " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i ~ ~ 41 ~ ~ do-, r \ _ ~ ~ .r ~`~~ I a~~11 4 ~~~ I•~ 1)//y~;~,~~~~ `'f ~! ~~~ r ~ ~_ FaF ~~~ f~ „lam I ~I~ /. I C I ., ~ I ~' ~ W ~ r~ ~ I ~ .~/ Y; rem ~ • ~ I i+?» 39;20' / m _ / 1 r i t '.~ 'aFde rmf~ -1 B .., ~ R =~762J.36 ~ r /~%1q~1 //p C0F" ~. ~~~~ 1 i ~ ~ I T ~ 44 .2T /1 111• a ~'ola etmly to , I 1 ~6 I' ~ ~ , 17 ,~~=~ aoe'49 / l r~ Au /, I I I e zo~3o2z6oos~9 , e ~ e '``- .~ ~ ~ 5 ~ - f n~~, II i ~ ,+; ~ .. / R • 1482.00 ~~~ ~ ~; ~ `bu t I~~ I~ I I ~ i ;,~ 1 213iAp. ~. ~ ~II I 7 •` i V !r P ri 223-W1691 i 'l T. 105.54 J. ~ I :~. Ir F' I ~ - 11" k ^~ +~ .'r~ / ~~. ~~.. , ~ I ~' ~•;~~' - I ~ I-~ g _ I I I I ~ Eoc ~~ ~ .I~ ~ ~ I ' 1 L 210.73 / I'~ ~~ I I c E y i _ I I I~ YM.,.~ ly,y.. ,,+} l lll~~~ ,. i i I ,, ~. ~ ~r.. l: ~' 1 ~ ~ l~ ~ ~~ i j. ~ ,« _ I I I _ IWeogay~r'0 I ~' ~ I~It+ • 1 ~ ~I ' '~ ~ ~ Q° ~ rx.pu2.oo -(~~ I I ~ ~ ~~ ,•~~ (I .~q ': I I r4 ~j'• r+u ~ Ganye 1Y~8915p ~ 1~I`11 ~ LY {~ I I fR I 1 d ~, 7 9p •• ~~ ~~ ~ bE Y ~." q > 1 I .~ I i ~' ~ i ~ 8 ~ I I ~ i I ~ 9 _ IEulr-sarnk~ea7 1~~; .r1 ~ p 1 ~~ma l 6, I I i -~ ~,• x E ~ ,• E -- I , 7 ~4ifl.~ ~~ i,~a~ °x III ~• II:I~ ~ ! E _~~I ~~ ~I f •'~~ .~ I i u~~ i+ I) I t o r _. I r - ,. - I 'i ': ~~ 7 ~y 6 s > L `" ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ L)-f. L..J I ( i ; - e I L~,.('~~ ~ ~ 1 0 r s £~ qe' ~ . ~ ~11 ~ I . ~, i ~ ~'Wa. Of / / 12 )~• d ~ / I I r ~ I I I i .} ~ ~ 1 F ns I •1.._ I. _I _. _ 1. I ~,I I ~~ }~ BY S'nDnk plots 9 M I P Pcrly a Ia.IRa M 20 a X (kam 1 ~ .~~~ ~ ~ ~~! ~ ~ ~ ~ I .. wa ~ ~ I ~ ~~ I ~ I { (,t~• ~ dd.mined :n h. o .f ;. x» ye r pi ~ 7onf'x' great or I iW- •u 1~~ wllc I 'ml n dih ~ 1 ~I erRn~ero'eoB laee canal eepc^.r~ II orxlh ev proteelN by I 1 ~ ~ ~ _ I~ I ~ sae rrom 'oo-g.or •.ooa) zone ~ (eof rood en+auanf ~^ ~~ >/ c ~ ~ ~~ ~ - - ~"1~/ _' ~ I ~ ~~ f ~o. .»ro ,.NI~~~ .~j ~+~ d eelarmmea) o^a Enne.aY nrene ~ a AE p , ~w+ Broa ~ ~~ ry / • ~ ! N --' 0 / ~ ~ \\ ~ `! I Irt~erPUe Hale d.p lot ira "f r Canty ~hlo 9^~ Ineaparalo0 C Neat, Ilup Nvnher .',9c+9~C13<N 'ga0~ Pre Mn"dry Frrmiri / / _ - S-Strn-t1 J ~ __ 2 _ _ _ 1 fiey n Y 5 D amx to actennl. a theft rann. No ~•, ~ Y~~ o _ y _-_-f ~l ~ ,~~.;../ [o~Pro.aaen hoer-~ d rvc 'n "ae e~ / ~ ~ 58T 551E i _. '- - _ - f 1~ I ~ I ~ 4 I 1 6.7~ I ~~~ •~l 1 f I •~ ,- , ~1 "i( 1' `~I r • _ -~ I_ I I a~ NBT535114 1 ~ I ark I.•~BM ~3 ~ °_l, / .. ti , ^' 122 79 .~ III [~ ~ .. ~,I I~ I I ~ ~~ ~ tF I I -- ~ J '1~ ~ ~ - -_ -~ ~ _ __ ,~ YI ~ ~i - I D k Rmhr Unu ~ f `_. - -- -- - - ~ y t -- - ~ 1~ _ ~ -. I - - LN 00 C" fiUl 5 0 . ~ . 2 S 72 7.6.23 ,J ~ ~ ~ I -. - __ ., i i 'on'al~, ~) n ,i JO.r..c I A F ~ ' 7., M1"57 . / ~ 7. - -, ~ \~~ ~~ ~~ -, _ INNpV AT IpN pR, -,, ~a. ~ ~ al _ L~,wy --~ ~ ~--J ,~ "~....~.. I 1 Q ;~ -~_..~.. 1- _ _f l___ } / -_ Y I ~ O ~~-..-..1._..-..~I a h ~- Q 'I 4 e~` RESERVE 'A' i UJ I y ~'~ i )5- ~,~, I .~ ~ o >a,p ~ w~ ><z +~ :,lo ~ og 0 ,~ ~ } ~ . 1 yt ~~ 0 rno ,,, '~~ 0 0 u u .« =u+ ; ~~~~~,,~,~ .y ~ rc n 1N ~' + 1 u~> n, t~ Q m 0°'~ lu ~ :w ~-~. oF"'~ rev. ~ O - =a 0 ~~ i (~ r~ n N CL Q ~- w ti z E' (ISTING TREE Li: ~T ~w '°""' 1 kvyM 1 •wa„ ~~ r ,,.:w nW..ti .u«~~ e .a >n a~..,e„ ,, w ~ ?>t W~V .: am:wrea :~ ti O ~ '--_ I` N 0 a ~- .~ t -' /~ ~ I I ~ 41 O ~ _ i~~ ~: _ ~ ~ ~ "M ~ W em :m ur y w,.,.. in e e ' ~ . w. ~ Q ~ is w i1a en.u .e. ~ u ro ~~ ~' ~i . ~,.,. w ~..,';n, ~ ~ ,., ,~, ~~ `: m ~„ 'vW U ~ Z ~ ,m Tolel Carlper InJces = 9,320 Q. ~ W ~, ' ~ W ~«. (A ~- C ,~ ~; ~ ~ ~ Q a° ~ p ,, ~a ~ ~ H`y o ~ ~ 0 0 n W H.u.-r ~ w~ c o ,~ ~ I,~ .~...~ ,.y m ,~ LEGEND ~~ ~r>> ~, ~f - GENERAL NOTES ~f,?1T[A;F(Yn luvr l°,!df PACA IMSCF3]CI)HYNJINIAf,O;A~V 1~9Y.fA-eY GRC:NV72`. VlUlii f. GH no: Orv(_T iRCI: ~tAVWU IrS CUTI'i_'r,FOtK nt;IIf CENfL2CX TIIf 1SLCN ^vF T11E 1Rff VHrVIN6A kaL4 ,::~=_._ -',tale: d-2d-009 TD G~ 1(qt POR E>'f~a INCn 0! Otn A iRfE'Afht(7'1P1('El;:A'T IAL5162 fYJfAINf0 fR10R iU II'~C i:ElAOYN PE hNI'~RffS ' ' Sh1CBl:CVHIDff L~/~rl LL77II II i P,UMING S,.AII &. ITCCUKACO IN ACG7RDANCC WIIN 11V. INtLRNATH)NAI. SiX;IEtt fN aBOR iCl 1 iFE IAIJ~,FI ~. r rr,-o ,.le'ral~m^e'ravlo~aa,.,,~ r,?I,a*rr-.ruf,~~slr.~,t,r,,,~nrr ,~Ila n` LEGEND C :J ~ Y ~ ~~= ~•- ,€t 0" ~g~,, ~e, T ` ~ c i Q Y `~ ~ _ 01 i~ ` tC i -_ n M-0 ~ ' W U ,u 1~ ~ f!-. ;_n+ Jx UI' plJ W n' L,:S, I,.. rMMu ~tq'AI,Y. v •CJJR 10AHr TREE PROTECTION FENCE ~I~~ - See Trcc Protcctwn Fong detail the ~nrcE, TREE PROTECTION W ~ ' GENERAL NOTES ~ c; I. GS y hC^ .dl~Ji~'f"09z^^' ~" G4;~P~nX(`ti rr`L :uN:iL'D Ac ~TFf+F .n;~ i ..: rT+. N L L~ "FI I ~. irW All 1111LL?CC Y([h 1 A 1 f PS YIV D i t rlkL.ll,. ~ ~ n~ fy i I ~: +qAl Cg1AV A A Mlh MIIM If INSfA„CP. Or Dl C JI1CN. $Md C I:, ~; I I I l l I I ~ ~ A (AV r(`{; SULn RO I ' ~: R Yil[RC 1 5'ICCbA'S1FVH?9 WNU7 Af ~-' l .II v I I., . + t. I1S [ ; l 01 M . l : INS A[~IINl Ie~ PRUIL(+,{,Y Iq A;;lAYS AND rR?fIDOB B:WLB[D."IIRMiNfD Oh'91f[. INRI1Rf fi:'.:.III „ ,.,A V [ 7 O~ , aaNOraNnTYrxw~~cuauh~s:nrufraRCrDO V,u4la+cooroRT~rcr[nrlnr.u~rnw,+ V Z Q ;,,,k ~ ltE Elrrlti C04~ °_~~-? ~,~ I 7.. PCNI:INC,:nW I NSMAIY iN rIAL[ hV0 L[ SfCUCfD IN AN L'I'¢:C:n: rl:5l::'pa WRING ~ r ~ FERt0010 PP,CVCNI?IIC IMANG[M=NI 01'CpBfRUG'iION VG-~N:! ~.~!AfcYUS. OPpS,rUIU LCAUfNEDI"I`. i'=~ ~ ~' OR UPON inf. ~?Cf PRfStRVAHUN 0.RCA. _1 W T Q. N E 3. ?RL[ PR[;fRVAfIUN :u6N5. AVAIIAUI[ rRUM ltf DIVISION OF IFND USE PNO LONG RANGE PIAMNNG-".- ~• a ~ BL IOCA?CO Al6wG inC rENGING, ANY LIWrW+t IN THE PRAIECi lvE FENCMG MUST BF hFFROVED BYTNE f r~ _ ~ - OF AND U3[ AND LONG RA ` Gt I A NNMG ~ `~ ~ . ) . . I i f. ~ n.a ~ m[ nrrRrnm 1uFF IxEf~RVUION ruN SAAU. eF AvwuSLf oN mE auILaNG ;nf BernRtlmRn cc~~ r ~ 7 M[NLC ur,, A ALI. nr~` uN m; cuwrR.+rloa of lnt FRAiec. mE ChV!+[R yuu- of RLSPptJr I I Q Q C NOIO~,1hG All .fAtI:.K.OnS AMJ ufeflE.4. tr, l7 ~4a S. U'UR1 L PHP.°,u' p' C~\5 RUCTION A15TE°S TO Fft[V[i11 Tll[ IX3TkUC7l0!1 p2 OAMAGC T0!' :II :- O O ] iFt[55N LB[7Ah£N NUGC'NS*RIICIDNACiIVItt,iI~WEM[hI AYDJfNi FlARMfNi Or C[A1VMfN NII Ir. ~. MAif 'At Oh..`.'(L.IJ 5-CRAC,f SHALL Bf F[RMITTEA tNmlk IHF TR[C FPPSPRVA'lION A TA. aRT L%LC I W n ~ lJ. 3 C ADL'1f10NAL rlu, u0ulU5, vR CC6~5TRUC11vN 0f8R'S SHAL 9E FU{'LU W11nIN Hlf LRI IILN RAO? ION + ' O t+ C iRtE f; of 19 ro DE PRf 3_cVED. ~ ,_ [r~VV 1:+ 5-NOAffACnMENrS. WCLLRMNG 8111 NOT lIhRfCD 10 RC~r[S, NALS, ADVC.¢iKMG P(YifR5,51GN5 rfaCl'~. .. Omf t TN iMOSE USED r0? TG GUY O WN YPING 4'hU Br AiTAC11rD TQ ANYTV~S ±iC BRA (n O ~ U LL n` VA l AN . CA , Mf• ft A ,I f r~ ~ 7. NO gA5t,0UE UONOS OR SrRID5:~5fANU.S RMILN ARC HARMIUL IO IRI'It::"nil !;: L~'.VI'9-NrnIJ I-t W ~ ~ ~pp TREE PRCSERVAtION ARCH 3 ~ L f B. NO FIRLU.Rn;A15HAtLBL P[9,MIf?CD NNinlN inf iRft PR[91`RYA1tOrt pxc;. ? ~ All UTANIe. MLLIID!NG $[RVIC! LIN[5, 9rIALL CF INUTALLFO IN ALGGY'DANI.'C WI' ^ 'n. f~c +r:'I.lu'+, ~ FRC5[RVAPON PIAN. IO ALLCZE+i51o A'TAQa'EY RICCWIRACiUR ih M•_R1G?nL rAfA ANCW^,11LtM4,fR[E:i.::~lu."~~~,~ii ~,i~.~l.r, LpA'ACIAMe N;0 A'tt7D G-M-G:'O fGRt5l lpJlr~1(KY -- MAINTENANCE PLAN -- PRUNE Au iR3[510 5r P:2'SCRbTD cX RrfCfAltD PR'.[M 10.^.OUrA[NC[MENT OF L'ONSIR1M:lI(M. +t~ ~:°e- -~ DUD, OfifA5f0. AND DMMGED UMBS~ AP!'tY DEEP RI><OT FF.RTIUTAi!ON 10 aLL iRPE5705E PRC5ERV[U OR RYLOCATW PRIOR iO COMMLNCL^!IDI: of _ CONSIRUClIfiN. PRCStRVfD OR!tf10CATfD TREES RAL>AU1NG ARE 10 BE FfR11U2C0 MO PRIIMD IIF RCCDCDI TWO Y[Ak5 n; I+=. ~~ ~; 0704 9 I LOh51RUCNON. .......,,.~,,........,...,,.,_ ..................................tea,.„+,. ,..., ,.,a:.,~~._.,.,.. ~~ ~.:. ,,.- date: i-2A-2 008 r - -- *REL PROTf~xxa rzNCIN6 ~~ iRCC5t0 BE RPMOV[D I + r l TRfE5101:EMAIN All fxls'vr.: r Es ~oTCD ti5 =nr+, ru ru:l=. ~rtro m -y,AI I !~: r[ehuu;l vARlr IN Int ~rRINe u~NS A nptr- ILUI l+R?L AP'Rf-tvPO 'x'_11=JD %OR A FFF1ilN C" 9 Y!,~-`+. At'iR 5 "tAC i ;HP IICMtH SIY,XiLD BF CVAUTAI'f0 D'/ A C Pf,?I=1EG -F76+:1i(ANG COIN!^,U'IJG MA; Ni'Wr~h.t R[COI.In,c±Wprt:lOf!=. 5~!AI I OY MAPi[. -~,~ ~ O k <i o _ _ yt 1°n _ ~ ~ ~ a n 4~ eg '' ~" i 5 ~ T '~'~ s~ 1 D P '2 - S ~ !; 'J' ~~ i r q .. 1. ~ - a ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ,2 ~ ~ ~ rn Y - ~ O O ~I O O :~ - ~ `~ - P a =& ~^ i L• ~ `' ern ~n ~~~ t Nx: _ f Y = ~ ; ~ h 9 ~ t ' 3 ~ ~ ~ ` +y ~ a a ' i E ~ I~ _ E?~ 7 5} ~ [ ~ 5 - _ iJ - '1 i ] i , ~T C~ -o :TD Y c11= ~l rn O rn INTERSTATE GAS SUPPLY, INC. ~~ BIRD H O U K ;`. IGS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS c o l l a b o r a t i v e ~ _ ~ i ~ Dublin, Ohio _ ~ =' ~ Tne pia, e maK,,.._ ~. , _,.,.._ -~ ~ Landscape Code Requirement Plan _ _ Cewk E:rv p~[~J IuM 6nl~b rc.,,. 4`Rah'. fennal. •,. .. T~~,.: urn 1,. ,~.~:-,~_„d-.. _, I. ~~~,-.,~: .., ~. ,o ~.. ,. ,~ , R-~~. _ . ~~. .~~: r f l ----~~ .' f ~ ~ Y~ ~~ ,. ~, ~~- o~=k L IO x ~~ ~ ~ M r, W U ~ ~ ~~ f~-~ L~Gi ND 'TTF. HIBIT H FOR PLANT PALETTE W f"' Q .~ ~a Zo ~W a= a ~W ~ t- Q ~ ~0 wW Q ~ ~O NU w~ z C~ ,. reolsW~: by. juh rir,. 07089 d,,ce: .~. 2~. ?078 ^=~' EXHIBIT G a ~~: a C` }` y ` ~ Jlw ~N~ T A E - 270 1~-11l-H-.11-II __~____.____. _________ ,~~ r,, /I- II-I- / - . ..~ . __ ~ .._ _ , ~ __ - , , __ __. _ . _ ~1 y vn 890.0 0 t GENERAL NOTES I, A' flAHIS SItAII MFEi Ok F.%CEcD SIANDA 155;r IN ihE US.a, SIANUARO FUK NUYSPKY SIOCK z ALI =v,NrING cYE:ennoNS tvlAU ADnE~E 10 AMFPoCAN ASOCWf10N OF NURSFkYMAA SYANUARDi 3. cl I I1F..P_I iG 9~ A N:WIMUTA OF 3'-0' ~F: I 1 '; 'V `5°i SFFCIFir~LY I~,l%1 - I ~ ~ '-' i 'r.:. HEUS SnALI. NAVE A MINIMUM '., : - ~ RpCEiiCU IIAPDWI)f)LY EAVK Ir ,i F I B I i ^1~ ' APE IN5'AUAl10N .v l it I I,'a Iul7F.AGYA7UND y. 1"DV7 Jrl WR 10 VEkiF` v: r'I JI NF.N AND unulreonthn~`, reLOeapon5 r~nl: unun , rKUk. ro.,cl >ikun'r~ a,x) ro PET FNINF 1Y TI f fl lD Nf N(,7llAl. LUU C 15 01° n.L VI. yr uTIU11E5 wnr r ~ :,navN orv irf TuN ~e Nol cA(L Qu Y ~ A PNNIAtv1J: OF 72 tlOURp 6fPORE BrG NN I Ilti°,~ a, (,mrYAaue R r,N,.~~: FoK me cosrcrrEYnl~:=,ru-xh Ic:,~re CCNCrri(M5 WrFh JANWC,CD D'. Caut n_rDR f1. LYA,J Nt-71N15NFD 4Uf8ACE, Gr,AV:S, TCraL ounun' AlD LYVI,i Do Not SIA, w(>~xuNi¢_unr,IVAtIUkv CO f 1110NS 11AV1' EEEN COkP,ECTFU- VERi r LIMrfS OF VIOKK ifCl'CME &ThRTIIrG 9. CONTKnC70R 5"ALt MAINTAIN YR`~ITNE DRpINAOI' IN IAIVII AREAS. I D. Fme cYADe Lnunr aReas ro rsoalDe 0. SMfwNI AND C0h i INJAL CftnDt CRfE OF IF'J:EGUTAYJNCS 9R Drr'Kia510N3, I~. uNTwclcksna<L:>EeD AU aquas DI51 I~{U WRINI; fnr CUN5iR11CTI(iN FKQ(t la.lnr I'°~r rl) AefT.rroar( P~IhI .r rn~-n I~u KO)E4Tr ,; ,Y~~ CNTRYI MASTER PALEiT~= V V \M)~ti , , III ~~11 ~11~ rr v , _ _0 , 1.~ J (~ r ~ t 1~\ rorln-- N( WALL ~ VJrD'x,;1FE SLOPE ~~I~ -..~.-.. V~ I' ur;. o ~ `~ ~ ~ ~~ I I Il, Nit ~I , r 1i I ~ I ~ ,..I ~ ~ I I ,, ~r ~ ,, ~~, I I ~ Ii -., ., ~,~ ~ ~~ _.I I I ..U-! ~I III ~~_ I D ~: ~~~ I I 1 1 I'r ~~ _ II II N ~~ i i ~I I I Fi ~ . ~ ~~~~:Ir r ~i f~;:r~. fi'I.~"I_.I~'f. . 'f.I.Y:ri~ f 0. tr t.l. hl~ ~ " r ,k ~ l rbnn.~ _ r t cnl ,a._~, ron ___ ~', _ i, i n ar r y. ',PI ^+, ~ywC h) 1•fWelao ,.'I, I < ;.zr• 1:'i I . . .: f :~.rn Irre-- r I'e: mG ..n 6:'d t:, r Le pf,~m~ .:a n,. I^:,~ le ~.~ -.~ ,.r- ~~ ~.. ,' ~ , r ' r I I ~ ... -.- i ~ r c 2.:.. r` t rl r - _ 1A~ K C r•C<'.Y•JaOU J - L,~Yleri f -,c ct _ .- ,. r m. _ I A..~„ .f, e r o. a< r _ _ nr....:.~ee I. r'i I , r r, ~ I. tl rr. ~ r t I- ~ I ~ ...~ r' ~ .>IY, - _ I rlma- n- - a.ut c•ar u, ,m uc .w:.n t. ......~ .. r> u~. .eor w e^~tnru ,.v rra~OarW NY r10W: ~ IContrumr ~ rasponslble for mstal6tfq III plant gwnnbe5 shorn m codr:d rotc on all n I'i V ':Y'.:'rt'6ant/r.- .c,.r ` I!xn (f > 'Urt ", 5/W,A IsnJ _~.Llaa'x~ xe.r•r ex n V _ r .rvn . t ,n ,,, .. r,v.•.c n.:.,rmmmmvs..+~r ar+~. uonn.mnrusaa U nintr~:n N,ly,~rN(,t t aC,JOt~Ti:R(rra M1~') w:. ~~~ r ~, ~- - ~. .~ ,, ,.r n: DECIDUOUS TREE rrY. .h - iYt X ~~ V VJ ~ ; ~ i Q .~ i Z ~ ^~, 'I~I W! J W ~; a = m. a ~? W ~, ~; Q ~ W:. C'r ~ Q N; ~ ~- o a Q~r 03 F-~p ~^. ~ U c C~ W (n .n ~; zC7'°- - - ~ 2 r_I r~ r,, hy, I Joa f¢ 07089 ~ ,1. Vin. 2008 X EVERGREEN TREE I FI J(HIBIT ~0.Y~ Nti H ~t. r ~ I I''/ r')%~ ,may / , / i _ •/ ~`~ ~ ~ ,~ _ 'A' Entrance Monument Icentif cation Sign rter:u n e~~luxnuM or r' ear, or tunlr.oPavAY NOlei Incse drxuxi ~=arc ^unceplwl w m!vrc and Is'n!r~Ned to rvprexnt Ice dcmyl :oocgt of the gro-xM',!gn, v.d boorq wall 5wn on 4270. Pnai io, n and de5~n of „M 9 x may ehx ~ at f nal drvr'oplnrnC 21x~ n bng r thr. cone<p[ rnvw; IMacE, _ ~„ i,,~ I ~' ~ ~~ ~~~,'r~n I_rca:~u71~ P,~n :z ~~x ~ ~J ~I I I I I I I ! I I I I I+ I ..L ~~ ~` ~ro ~"~- =o ~ ' ~~ O ~ $ U , ~~ k W ~ Q B ~ f Zo ~Q ~ W g n4. = y ~ W ~ ~ c ~~ ~n-o Q ~L ~: N ~ 0 cLUc~ w~~. z (~ ~ ~n= - o ._~, I, ~klllnr~ o,~'~,~ aat°: zq. pr:',.e _h°~ FXHI8IT !,I 'B' I-270 Building Wall Sign 'A' Entrance Monument Identification Sign Plan rtgGfrJ r, MINIbN1El G'ti' DAt:r Or RIGN1.Cr-N'AY 'A' Entrance Monument Ident~ficat~on Sign Elevation P;?Ct0 A Mlkl!,IIA,I 0'. M1' QAC!', Gr kV~'1r.GP.VIA'r 'A' Entrance Monument Identification Sign Night Elevation PULED n uNIWUM M 8' ryAfn GF P.!CjIT{)EA/AY ~.- ~ 4 ~ ~ -. ° (~ O L q q kAP ~ t I I"I T i~ ~ ~-. ~ ~ f f a c~ W U < _ ~~ y nt el t~tI S1 II ~ yy 6'- ' ~~~YYWI CLCVHIIVIY #'~. SOLE, ~i~6'^ I'-0 II 1r- _ ~~ I ~ S, ~i A ~ ~ ~'`) to e e ~ c /SrO JPP 90~P /S'.P M P 30 P ' • ~ 3D•0 30•P ~,ur~aer _ ~ ~ +:a eveyru :nnrt~ _- _ fiia --- --- -- .Rt:lYC1TEQ I - ca"v"r__J_ ---- ~~115'iU -_-L ---~ - ~ - - - - ~1L~tty ': f 'f ' ALIN'tknd G' I,G r, ~ t LAiIINf +CVNC LC •.I~;:_ -- - - _ ~CCYIUCC ' ( ^4Y ti'If~G 1 f q -. - - _ _ _ f>>':( 1~1['jIONf G ~~PI"i.F IO r( GL :4CC C491 JY(SiCIiC fARIIiCL ~- 7 Z('^ M -•_ - - T _ - ~ •.i_ ~ r NGOW - OPA'MI•~;~C`W hINNy/'}u I. YY - of Wf lN[ Tp!A ~ i ' \ rtST lp! ~T0.1V:1Ai~u CV IbJ I rt. 1FA ~ ~11 a ~ -_- - _._ __-.__ _ kIGC VCV[EP - J eFA.1, V,1 ffI'-~ fly ~IVA7 f - CASE l 1C) C C!~M.~1~ T-u li•~ ItODN C~ I .MIC a q I It~i.t?- ~ ~~ ~ a _- --..... ___ - __ nw uv rldc tmu na~.u,n -7 !ovnt Ili A' /..uV+uN I. r•ov ~` - yt re L = I ~ `5'Ut 5131CG ~ v i t d t s lu [ i a, - niG- ~ X91 r i i i n P.i' ue(j 016 CY1N- \ }, 3f r e - _- - - .,..- G ~ t", C.tSl tulS7GhY ruin 7 ~ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ -_ _ - I~,S+IMf~i(7NC +iHA .~7pA P~IOLx T ~3P~B G;i C57/Y : R ~ _ _ -_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ - r I i n ~ t111 I!.t A r - - . . I !/AM+ ' . ~ rt - `'rrvc5+oxr u l a a e ' y ~ _ (:. ~ _ - - _r - - ~_~ , - ~- v. i a = - - - ---- - - - - - --- -1 'f'til Pau -_ _ _. , .: . -_ f -_- 1 .U1..4VE .\ _ _ ~ 1~I F~(X7K -....-.,. ~ .. . _ - - - - i y t ~ F yl ar.o ~'7et~`I } "S I v F~ -r a ' ~.c~yi !I [r~ 677•_ '- 1~I1 - .I :. SOUTH ELEVATION "' =_- _ _ sent! In;„-rr, , _ _ _ _ - ~ EAST ELEVATION ` 4 - SCnLE: Vib.~r o- e (n LL g ~ p W _ ~~ Q t PARTIAL FLAN • DOCK AREA ~ S(~Atf-' .~I.. u ~ 9 g~ I 8 30•P wP ~ W k - - --~- ' - - 1-~--- - - - - Z ~ $', -~,5rw.~r~,t~~,na - W ~ -ek'U VtlrCR i } LL~~ ~ ~. -U5r In.•t_sl ruua USr UuC91PVC J ~ c C(>t"bC _ d ~ YI:tUCt YN~CUY ~.~rt U)l351P4 (n ~tq'n I ~ ~ V/° 'rr e7aiPR l+ fi _ //1n~ U - lUV ~V A IK/Jnt V Z ~ ~F nrcu ir.~ W LL O~ Cka L\[ ~ O O ~ ul~ '~.~I i rn.l Q L f- $` ~L1 ~ c ~~' _ - - ~ ~,I L,,, ? ~ p W a ~. ~' _ -r_ ~:• / I.I r '- t no~revisrore: by_ ~ - i fob no: 07087,01 rlnto: 4flalOB :b~oe IXHIBIT J ~ el: ,~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE. lip. r~V <[ r m ~ ~ ~ v m ~ ? rn o ~ '+ ~,e, r+~ ~ O D ~ N fD O ~ ~ ~ D o o ' ' ~ o 0 ~ 0 - .~ m ~ N W ~ ~ ~ m a a ~ ~ 3 -*, -*, 3 ~ 3 3 o co a a ~ ~ cD v c~ w o fD . + N N re• .D O O o D f1 y ~ S N ~ D 7 :+ N ~ Of OD W N O O ~1 _ N W ~ . JW UI U7 W cp n 0 ~ ~ W NW ~ (n ~ ~ to N ~ : r ~ r i- 'T7 h N O V I T /v D _ • ~ Z = 3 T n m o ~ o ~ v ~ C7 'c 0 m • ~ •'. .<• e ee • eee •<e•• <e ••ee • e eeeeeeee eee e e e• o e• ~ •c ee <~ <~• ee ~' ~ e •e~e~e• •,• •e eeeeses• ,~<~,• ee i ~ r` e e e e~~ e e• e e e • e 1~ e f t, T~ s ee ~ e e • < • ~ ~ , ~ < , • see Ne' ~~ ••• .e.~ e •. e~:e. < ee ., ee ee~< rye . e • . ~.. .~. ~. eee ~ e•ee e e < < • • e '• a •e s • e •<• e~ • s a ~~eeee v w i,+ ~ ar~v ay O .~. ,', . . .•. e• . ; ~ ` . ~,e • e . e V ' . f < ~ • ~ i • e •• • e t e rJ~'{ • ee~e e of e • ~ efe ~'h a of e e • • .•. •.eee • • • • • O • f Z ?•v~m rn Lh ~ " ~~0. n Z ~; ;, n ~ ~ ro < v D ~ ~? V Cn ~. V. 3 A Q Cn g~ 2 -~ A~ ~' goy x Q: - n ~~ ~Q~ 3 O x ~' Q CJ .7 % C• N ~ ~ ~ N P^ .~ 1~ V ~ < v2 n. ~. ~a a w - n ~~ ~ cn -~ b ~v~ V 1 2 D ~ m D n C7 m D C!1 C7 ~ (n m ~ O p D ~ ~ D -+ o D ~ '6 O D 2 ~. ~ Q C W z 0 ~ O D (n ~ < ~ ~ C rn N D :i7 A v O °• ~ rn Z •• o D N •o '? II O N 0 V N W w o o Evans, N,echwart, Hambleton 8 Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, Oli 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax:614.775.4800 SURVEY OF ACREAGE PARCEL VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY No. 3011 CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH10 na c nn x x v i Date: Apd/24, 2008 ~ Job No. 2007-2390 ~ Sca/e: >" = 60' Q M - - h o ~\~ m ~ ~0~ -~ ~~ "~~ V ~~ ~ 0' / ~i ~Q ~~ D~ QQ, cy Q Q ~Q~~~~ ~~ ~' Q• /~ SHAMROCK ll RESER !/E 'A " P.B. 57, P. 7 DUKE REALTY OH/O 930 A C. 1. N. 2003D2260056923 15.213 A C. 3/4 " IRON PIPE TPOB RPOB v N87'S8'37"'W 114.87' - - - - -- 1 " SOLID IRON P/N /N CONCRETE (0.83' N) DUKE REAL TY OH/O 11.178 AC. /. N. 200301030002980 CUR t/E TABLE CUR t/E DEL TA RAD/US ARC CH BRG CH Ct 8728'41" 34.50' 52.67' S69'S7'12"W 47.70' C2 22 45'47" 24.50' 9.73' N54'S5'34 "W 9.67' LINE TABLE LINE BEARING D/STANCE L 1 S26 12'52"W 10.24' L2 N66'18'27"W 3.82' L3 N23 43'43'E 22.15' L4 58758'37"E 51.87' • = 1. P. FND. o = 1. P. SET I.P. Set are 13/16" (. D. iron pipes with cop inscribed EMHT INC BASIS OF BEARINGS.• The Beorings shown hereon ore hosed on the Ohio State P/one Coordinate Sysfem-South Zone os per NA083 (1986 Adjustment). Soid bearings originoted from afie/d froverse which was referenced to said coordinote system by GPS observations, and establish a bearing of North 23' 43' 43" East for o portion of the eoster/y right-of-woy line of Emerold Parkway. 60' 0 60' 120' GRAPH/C SCALE (/N FEET) OCCUPA T/ON NO TE.• Occupofion, in genera/, is as shown hereon. SURI/EY NOTE.• This survey wos prepored using documents of record, prior pats of survey, and observed evidence located by an actual fie/d survey. ``,t`~~~~tt~~ra~~~~~`~ ~ ~ • •• ~~ i ~~ ~ :• HEATRER•• ~~ • _ ~"... ~ - By 0.031 ACRE SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, CITY OF DUBLIN, LYING IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NO.3011, BEING PART OF THE 11.178 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO DUKE REALTY OHIO BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 200301030002980, (ALL REFERENCES ARE TO THE RECORDS OF THE RECORDER' S OFFICE, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO) AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGII~'NING, FOR REFERENCE,I~i T THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 11.178 ACRE TRACT, AT THE COMMON CORNER OF THE 15.213 AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS CONVEYED TO DUKE REALTY OHIO BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 200302260056923, BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF RESERVE "A" OF "SHAMROCK II", A SUBDIVISION OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 7, AND BEING WITNESSED BY A 1" SOLID IRON PIN FOUND 0.83 FEET NORTH; THENCE NORTH 87° 58' 37" WEST, A DISTAIv'CE OF 114.87 FEET, WITH THE LINE COMMON TO SAID 11.178 AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, TO AN IRON PIN SET AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ACROSS SAID 11.178 ACRE TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTH 26° 12' S2" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 10.24 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET; WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 87° 28' 41 ", A RADIUS OF 34.50 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 52.67 FEET, AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 69° 57' 12" WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 47.70 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET; NORTH 66° 18' 27" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3.82 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET; WITH A CURVE TO THE RIGH'T', HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22° 45' 47", A RADIUS OF 24.50 FEET, AN ARC LENGTH OF 9.73 FEET, AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 54° 55' 34" WEST, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 9.67 FEET, TO AN IRON PIN SET IN THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF EMERALD PARKWAY, BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE 0.370 ACRE TRACT CUNVEYF,D TO CITY OF DUBLIN II~~ OFFICIAL RECORD 3I969B04; THENCE NORTH 23° 43' 43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 22.15 FEET, WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-UF-WAY LINE, TO A 3/4 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND AT THE COMMON CORiVER OF SAID 11.178, 0.370, AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, BEING A SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF EMERALD PARKWAY AS DEDICATED IN PLAT BOOK 86, PAGE 24; THENCE SOUTH 87° S8' 37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 51.87 FEET, WITH THE LINE COMMON TO SAID 11.178 AND 0.930 ACRE TRACTS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIrJNTNG, CONTAINING 0.031 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALL LEGAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF PREVIOUS RECORD. IRON PINS SET, WHERE INDICATED, ARE IRON PIPES, THIRTEEN SIXTEENTHS (13/16) INCH INSIDE DIAMETER, THIRTY {30) INCHES LONG WITH A PLASTIC PLUG PLACED IN THE TOP BEARING THE INITIALS EMHT INC. THE BEARINGS HEREIN ARE BASED ON SOUTH 87° 54' 40" WEST FOR THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF RESERVE "A" OF "SHAMROCK II", A SUBDIVISION U:F RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 7, RECORDF~'S~O~l"flid,~E, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO. EVANS, ME~~P~;~tc°P,•f~~A2"1~QN, & TILTON, INC. ,• ~;~ O ~, HEATHER~,.tG ~_~~®~ DATE PROFESSIC7I?1 ~o'~EY~.~~ 8307 .. .. ~ HLK:tnw/23Apc08 JI~~,~°~~~cc~e~~s'~~~~`` o_o3i ao ~z3~o.ao~ cvans, Mechwart, Hamoleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers. Surveyors, Planners, 5cien'ists Computed by Checked by az ~~ t . , , .t~ . , 1 ,t. , 1. . . ..r._..___.___..__,__..._..._~....... _ ___ .. • .. , , ~ ; ~ , ~ , , .. .~ ...a .. .... ~......t._. .. .~ ... .. ~ ~ '~~ t t , ~ , t I ~ ; ~ t I .{. f .+.....1.... .' n t ~ I ~ • ~ i ---- ---- --• ---~---~ -~--.._.~.__. 1_.. .. .._ _ , ; i • I i ' f ~ i } 1 _ 1 • . }. ~. . 1 :...:_.._ _ _:~ , .._._ :. _... 1 __ .__ _ .. . ._ j.... _. ... .._ .. .,~. , _~.._....~..____z___ _.. .. ;... .. L. ..t .. . F ~ t _. .% ~ __._~.... ~.., ..{...... .1_ .. ... ti_.._ 1_.. __, .... ~_4_, ~ I ~ ~ ~ t 1 , ~ `FV_j •.._ _.~. ..ice.... ~.. t ' ~ I .. ... .._ 1 • ~ ~ ~ 4 , 1 , ~ _ _ ,Y~_ -~-- -L- --#- ' i t + t ~/ ~ fy . .. .. ._ .. •..... _.... ~.. ... y. .. ...1...~. .L.. t f ~ 1 t .... ... .. ... .. .. ~ } i ~ ; 1 i • ~ ' ~ ~ , r ... ~r_...v.. ... __..~,... .. ... .__~... . .~.. ...L ... .. _.. ._L ....« ~... .. ~ 1 1 ' t 1 t ( i 1 I 1 ; ~ i ~ i i . 1 i 1 i t t , , I 1 1 ;. 1 ; : 1 r ~~ _.s__.. _~.._. __• .., ~I ~ i~ Illp~l I ~ 1! 11 I !f I j 1 ~ ,' l,' I 1~ I J ' ~. (~ f ~ _~ / ~n'~~~atlon Or~v ~ 1 ~- , _`fso~) I 1 ~._ ~ ~ I ~ ~ .~\ ~ ~jl ,ll - r~ ~ ~ %/ ;w/ i ~i //~: i i~ ~~ ~/ i ,, . ~ I, ~I;I~~ ~ ~ ~, ~~~ ~ i l~ l ~ i I ~ LI ~~~ ~~~ I i I I ~ I I~ I ' i I ~ -- ~ ----r---- -I- --- 6 - - - - - - - - PJC~.. V; Pe =encc r j ! ; ! `,j I __ -~ ~ ` ~' ,J ~ ~ ~,1 /// / //~ / //% / //~ / / // / / /// / ~~ ~ ~/ / ~~x~~- g` ~'~e .,o~'p 3g3tl~y x ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~, r Sg~m '.V DO ~~e$ c T ~ _ 5 y oo a~ y r m + , -_., _ I I - -' r I -.. 1 - !. ___ II I rat ~. ,rli J ~ ~ ~~ 1 '~ i -~ _` I i' ~ ~ /j ~ l i>r I /I ~l I ~~ /~ .~ (~~ /~~ %~ // ! /A //r / ~/ :-~ ~~ `~-- ~ I ~i ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ r~~~ //, ~ I ~~~ ~ REVISIONS ~JUBIIN. OHcO Ode :oe nn "'"" "'R °~"'""" ©~ SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ~.4rch J. zxa zpp--~~ - IGS Corporate Headquarters ' PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT aA ~~~ ~' _ ~~~ 1 . w¢~s2 r~:c~ Exn~rn s Ill i ~ ~ f~ ~J! I ~ ! I i( ~ + I i( ~ ; ~ IIl t4 1 1 ~ t I1 Ilrl~ { .I (i ;, (( ~I `f (f f (ll 1 J ! 1 (f ' ~ jf! ~. ~- ° (8p) ( r 1 ~- l , ~- ~~\ (~ ~ ~\ ; . I ----~ i ... _~ ( - -f f ! _ _. _I I _---~ i ----1 I - ._I I ----I I ---~ -- I II~ I ~. \..`~ ~~-' ! ! •f• ~' - -?-~ i . • 1 (~ ~• ,.. Ql 1 1 '-• r,;' a~1j' j j ~ r ~~.:.; ' ~, U U ~i ~~ l // / - ._ -1 11 I L I ~_ _ _ ~ I I I ~ I 11 I ~ I I I I 1 ~ i ~ , / /~ ~ // / / t / /' / 11 l~~ // ~ / i -- I~~,~~ // ~ ~ _ ~ i __ ~ / / i _ ,, • / ~ r ------- ;- ._ _ I ~ ~ / // ~ ~ A'i . Gence ~. (~ ~ ~i ---- - - -~ - ------ v I ,,~ V `~ l~ / ~~~~ ~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i /-' % / ~ /%'!/ / //i / ~ /// / //~ / //i / / //~ / /, /~ / ~/ / / / / ~ !/ / / / ~m ~~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ A ` } ' n _ ~ z _ = ~ 4 °' n D u r- m Y REV ISIIXJS ©® Dl1BLIN. OR:O Dr. a n> """K o"tc xc+vorou SITE DEVEIOPMENTPLANFOR >AarchJ2908 ~ea)s39o „ „ IGS Corporate Headquarters • PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT ^~ ~ Flre Truck Exhibit 4 ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ I I f '. 1 ' j ~~ f ij ~i ~ I ~I It~~ i~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ;. ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,. ,. ~l i- ~ ;~ , ,., iii ~ 1,~ _~` _ ~~ - I ~r~ __ ~nnovatiOn p~ 1~ 1 i~ ~ i /; " ! ~ ~/ •~1 I/~; ~~ .J li ~ ;y / / ' ~ ~ /~ /% , / ` ~ ;~ ~ ~ `-~ - ///~ ~ /// ~ /// ~ ~ /// ~ / // ~ / //~ ~ / i~ / // ~ ~~ / i ~~ / pa`kwoo ~ ~ ~, f ~ ~ ~_ ~__ I ._.1 ~ __--1 ~ . -_.. _i --~_. I - __J~ _ _ ~'. _ 1 ~' i ~- ;, _ ~-- ~ L_ ,_ ~~~ ~' '` ~ ~~ i~~ s ~/ Ills ~ii~l~-~~~ :i ~~ ~ ,. ri ~ ~ ~7Tr>~ I 0 ail. I,il,!I I t I -_ --- ^~ ---- ~ I -----_-® Wcx.n-Wtt renCC °5Aa ~a5 ~ ~~ s., O ~- o ~3~ '~°i am' _ ~,_ s ~ D ~ z R ° ~~ - - m ~ `7 Cn > I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN POR ~tarcn 3.200.9 2oo~~s~o IGS Corporate Headquarters ~~ ~,n., PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT Rre Truck Exhibit 5 ~ ~ ~ ____ _ :__ ,~~ - - _- t_ _ _~ - _} ._ i ~; , i I -' .. ..~ i ,1 +' I r ~~ - , -~ ~~ ~~~: ~ry -- ,a ~. ' ~ ~~ ~: ~ .- ~l .. ~~`,J ~ +. o _ ~c. V~ n, _ Site Data: . i:.-, r~4 -,~ u. '; -~ +~ Total Site: 16.170 Ac, U ~ 1' ~ ?,~,.~ i e r~ ~rf „;; : r ~~ Park + 3.25 Ac, Building Phase 1 + 100,800 SF ~ Parking __ i . -- 4.. . Surface 394 Spaces ~ ~, Structure 66 Spaces '~, Total 460 Spaces Parking Raiio 4.56 Spac:es11,000 SF ~ .~ !1 i ,J ' t~ / ~. r f l i ~ i /~ ,}- _~~ c h r'~ l+.~~`~~`' ' ~'? . ~~ _ ~~k ~~~~, l ., . t ; ;f ~. ^` ~~ ./~~ ,L~ _ ..-- _ ~. ~:. ,. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MAY 15, 2008 CITY OF DUBLIN.. -~~~ ~ ~• ~~ 5800 Shier-Rings Road Oubfirt. Ohio 43016-1236 Phone/ iOD: 614.4T0-4600 fax: 6 t 4.410-1747 Web Site: www.dubfin.oh.tn Creating a Legacy DRAFT The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Tuttle North - IGS Emerald Parkway 08-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Proposal: Two corporate office buildings totaling 176,400 square feet with associated site improvements within the Tuttle North PCU, Planned Commerce Development District. The site is located on the east side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan application to rezone the property from PCD to PUD, Planned Unit Development district under the provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: David C. Warner, IGS; represented by Gary Smith, Bird Houk Collaborative. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planner tI. Contact Information: (614) 410-4690, jrauch@dublin.oh.us MOTION: To approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it is compatible with the development pattern in this area and meets the criteria set forth in Code Section 153.050 and the ten band Ilse Principles, with four conditions: 1) The applicant provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's stocmwater management plan requirements and flood control Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) All compensating storage improvements must be made to Reserve A prior its dedication, should it be deeded to City; 3) The text be revised to incorporate comments identified within this report prior to scheduling for City Council; and ;,S SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL ~~ Page 1 of 2 ~~--FOR MEETING ON~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MAY 15, 2008 3. Tuttle North - IGS Emerald Parkway 08-020L Rezoning/PreGminary Development Plan 4) That the development text be revised to include language within the LEED Certification portion that would allow the use of additional alternative energy saving and creating devices, the details of which will be reviewed for approved at the final development plan stage. 3irn Houk, Bird Houk Collaborative agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 7 - 0. RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CF,RTIFICATION /~~ J nifcr M. Bauch, AICP anner II Page 2 of 2 Dnblin Planning and 'Coning Conunission May 15, 2008 -Meeting Minutes (~~~ Page 7 of 10 3. Tuttle North -IGS )~;merald Parkway 08-02QZ Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Mr. 'Zimmerman polled the Commissioners who agreed that no presentation was needed for this consent case. Jim Houk, Bird Houk Collaborative, representing IGS, stated that the applicant agreed to the three conditions but requested an additional modification to the proposed development text regarding the use of additional ctiergy sources. He said the applicant is studying other possible alternative energy sources and they would like to include this as an option within the development text. Mr. Houk explained that this was very important to their client. Mr. Saneholtz said as technology evolves, the City should consider the use of wield turbines and other alten~ative energy sources. Mr. Freimarui said the architectural rendering providing a view of the building from I-270 was fantastic. He asked if the applicant was comfortable with the number of parking spaces needed for the construction of the Phase I development. Mr. Houk said they were comfortable with the proposed number of spaces. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if a condition was needed in case there was a change of use to eliminate some of the excess parking. Mr. Langworihy stated a development could always be over Code, but parking must meet the minimum requirement. Ms. 1Zauch suggested the addition of Condition 4: That the development text be revised to include language that would allow the use of additional alternative energy saving devices, the details of which will be reviewed for approval at the final development plan stage. Mr. Saneholtz asked that Condition 4 be modified to add energy creating devices. Mr. Taylor suggested that the proposed language be added within the LEER Certification portion of the text. Mr. Houk agreed to the four conditions listed below. MOTION AND VO`L'E Mr. Zimmerman made a motion to approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it is compatible with the development pattern in this area and meets the criteria set forth in Code Section 153.050 and the ten Land Use Principles, with four conditions: 1) The applicant provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's storn~water management plan requirements and flood control Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) All compensating storage improvements trust be made to Reserve A prior its dedication, should it he deeded to City; 3) The text be revised to incorporate cotrunents identified within this report prior to scheduling for City Council; and 4) 'That the development text be revised to include language within the LEER Certification portion that would allow the use of additional alternative energy saving and creating devices, the details of which will be reviewed for approval at the final development plan stage. ~~ :>UtiP;111 III, ,~, c;c)Ur~iC:IL ~- _i-OR MEETING ON ~~~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Comnussion DRAFT ~ May 15, 2008 -Meeting Minutes Page8of10 Mr. Taylor seconded the motion. Th.e vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Ms. Amoroso Groomes, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Mr. Freimann, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Approved 7 - 0.) PLANNING REPORT CI'! z OF Dl'BL;'C. ~ ~~ ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~~ Reipe rF..r~ seoo 5~~ hood oabie, Ohio 43016.1236 MAY 15, 2008 ihau: 61 N10a600 Fax: 614-I1MN7 Web Site: v~r.dub0nob.us SECTION I -CASE INFORMATION: 3. Tuttle North -IGS Emerald Parkway 08-0242 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Proposal: Two corporate office buildings totaling 176,400 squaze feet with associated site improvements within the Tuttle North PCD, Planned Commerce Development District. The site is located on the east side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan application to rezone the property from PCD to POD, Planned Unit Development District under the provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: David C. Warner, IGS; represented by Gary Smith, Bird Houk Collaborative. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Plannex II. Contact Information: (614) 410.4690, jrauch@dublin.oh.us Case Summary This is a request for review and approval of a rezoning (preliminary development plan) application to modify an existing planned district and development text for a parcel located on the east side of Emerald Parkway as part of the Tuttle North Extension Planned Commerce District. It is Planning's opinion that the proposed use is compatible with the character of the area and approval of this request is recommended. Work Session Update The Planning and Zoning Commission informally reviewed this proposal at the April 10, 2008 work session and provided feedback regarding the proposed site layout, landscape and architectural details for the proposal, and plans for the reserve area. The Commission posed questions about the setback of the proposed building along the Interstate 270 (I-270) frontage and requested additional perspective drawings of the site layout compared to adjacent buildings, which have been provided. The Commission also requested increased architectural detail and landscaping along the I-270 frontage and the applicant has addressed these concerns. The text has been modified to clarify the improvements that will take place in Phase One of the site development, and what open space or park amenities are provided by the City within Reserve A. Case Background The original rezoning/preliminazy development plan for the Tuttle North Extension Planned Commerce District was approved by City Council on February 17, 1998. At the time of City Council approval, a condition was added to the development text to require a 193-foot building 1~~~,':~ `,~!~~~11~i1 ED TO COUNCIL ~~y ~ or. M~:;rI~vG oN~~ Planning and Zoning Commission May 15, 2008 -- Planning Report Case No. 08-0202 -Page 2 of 8 setback along I-270. The applicant is proposing to revise the text to allow a 100-foot building setback to conceal the parking areas along the I-270 frontage. In addition, the text required cross access with the parcel to the south through a central drive aisle. The applicant is proposing to provide this access in conjunction with a shared drive located in the southwestern corner of the site. Site Description Project Site The 16-acre site is located between I-270 and Emerald Parkway, at the intersection with Innovation Drive. The undeveloped site contains substantial tree rows along the southern and western property lines, and along Cosgray Creek on the north edge of the site. The northern third of the site is within the FEMA designated floodpiain for Cosgray Creek. Surrounding Sites The site is currently zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, as part of the Tuttle North Extension plan. To the south is the Qwest office building, zoned PCD, as part of the 'T`homas Kohler plan. Adjacent properties to the west are zoned RI, Restricted Industrial District and property to the north is zoned, LI, Limited Industrial District. Interstate 270 is to the east. Plan Description Overview The proposed rezoning would permit the construction of two corporate office buildings on the eastern portion of the site. Surface and underground parking azeas are provided. Outdoor terraces, a retention pond, and landscaped areas are provided along I-270. Access to the site is at the intersection with Innovation Drive. A shared secondary access with the property to the south is provided in the southwest corner for service and deliveries. Site Layout The proposed site plan indicates a 100,800-square-foot, four-story building located in the southeastern portion of the site, parallel to I-270. A second 75,600-square-foot, three-story building is located north of the larger building, oriented east and west. A proposed traffic circle is located between the two buildings and provides access to the main drive aisle that connects with Emerald Parkway. Surface parking areas are located north and west of the two buildings and an underground parking area is located below the larger building. The preliminary plan shows a plaza area located north of the larger building, as well as a series of tiered landscape areas and a retention pond located between the building and I-270. A lazge reserve area (Reserve A) is located in the northern third of the site and contains a portion of Cosgray Creek. Density The proposed development text permits a density of 17,500 square feet of building area per acre with surface parking, and allows for City Council approval of increased density if a parking structure is utilized. The proposed square footage of the two buildings totals 176,400 square feet for the 16 acre site, which equals 11,025 square feet per acre. Proposed Uses The approved development text specifies office and office related uses, which this proposal meets. The applicant is not proposing any modifications to the overall permitted uses. The underground Planning and Zoning Commission May 15, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0202 -Page 3 of 8 parking is considered a permitted use. Only an above ground or detached garage would require a conditional use approval. Project Phasing The proposed development has been divided into two phases desigmed for development by one or multiple owners. Phase One includes the 100,800-square-foot building with an underground parking garage, surface parking area, landscaping along I-270 and the improvements to Reserve A. Phase Two includes the 75,600-square-foot building and the remaining surface parking area. The Phase T'wo Land will be graded and seeded with the construction of Phase One until final development plan approval Phase Two. .Setbacks The proposed plans and revised development text indicate a 100-foot building and parking setback along 1-270. A 25-foot pavement and 35-foot building setback is shown along the southern property line, adjacent to the existing Qwest building. A 30-foot setback for pavement and a 50- foot setback for buildings are required along the Emerald Parkway. The northern property line setbacks indicate 15 feet for pavement and 40 feet for buildings, which must be specified within the development text. The development text states that if the property is divided no setback for shared access and ten feet for parking will be required. Planning recommends that the text be revised to eliminate the parking setback to ensure proper cross access. In addition, the proposed text states that a minimum sepazation between the two buildings will be 50 feet in the event of a property split. Planning recommends a 50-foot separation between buildings be maintained under any circumstance. The proposed development text also allows for the provision of a physical connection between the two buildings. The proposed text will need to be revised to reflect these changes and remove the side and rear yard requirements that would conflict with these modifications. Access and Traffic The proposed plan shows two access points for the site from Emerald Parkway: afull-service, primary access drive at Innovation Drive and a secondary shared right-in, right-out access drive with the property to the south. 71us connection is necessary to fulfill the requirement of the previously approved PUD. The main drive aisle from Innovation Drive terminates into a traffic circle located between the entrances to the two proposed buildings. The secondary access drive will be used for this site and the site to the south to accommodate service vehicles and truck deliveries. The applicant has submitted a preliminary traffic study for review, and Engineering will continue to work with the applicant to finalize this study. Pedestrian Connections The plans indicate the addition of two new internal sidewalks leading from the proposed buildings to the existing eight-foot asphalt bikepath that runs north and south on the east side of Emerald Parkway. Utilities/Stormwater Management Service is provided by a 16-inch water main located on the western side of Emerald Parkway and an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line on the east side of Emerald Parkway. No opening cutting of the Planning and Zoning Commission May 15, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0207._. -Page 4 of 8 existing pavement will be permitted to access the existing waterline. The final details regarding these connections will be provided with the final development plan. The plans indicate a large retention basin on the eastern edge of the site along I-270 to accommodate stormwater for the site. The final development plan will need to include a stormwater management report that complies with the City's stormwater code and flood control code. Floodplain The proposed plans indicate that a portion of the Phase Two parking area is located within a FEMA designated flood zone. Development is permitted within this azea but the additional fill required for proper grading and drainage of the parking area will be compensated within Reserve A along the northeastern side of the creek. Parking Code requires different parking standazds for medical office and administrative office at 1 space per 200 and 1 space per 250, respectively. To provide a uniform calculation and reduce the need for additional impervious surface, the proposed development text uses a uniform parking provision for all office uses at one space per 250 square feet. At the work session, the Commission inquired about the use of deferred parking to decrease the amount of impervious material on the site. The applicant has determined the proposed amount of parking is necessary to accommodate the proposed use. Plans have been revised to provide compact car spaces for up to 20 percent of the parking, decreasing the amount of impervious surface. ADA accessible spaces aze proposed adjacent to the building entrance, and sidewalks connect all parking areas to the building. Service and delivery areas for the Phase One building are planned in the southwest corner of the building. Reserve A The proposed plans indicate a 3.25-acre reserve area in the northern third of the site, which includes a portion of the Cosgray Creek. The plans also indicate the preservation of a large existing tree row that runs along the creek. 1'he development text states that this area will remain a natural reserve but may include bikepaths, pedestrian access or other park elements, or may be dedicated to the City of Dublin as pazk space. Improvements to Reserve A will be completed with Phase One of the proposed development. The applicant is also compensating flood area for fill placed within the floodplain on the south side of the creek to accommodate the Phase Two parking lot with storage on the northeastern area of the creek. To meet FEMA requirements, all compensating storage improvements must be made within the boundaries of the site, and should Reserve A be deeded to City, all compensating storage improvements must occur prior to the dedication. Architecture and Materials The preliminary development plan includes proposed architectural elevations for the Phase One office building. T'he development text states that the buildings are limited to six stories and a maximum of 90 feet in height and shall incorporate complementary architectural design. The Planning and 7.oning Commission May 15, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0202 -Page 5 of 8 preliminary development plans indicate a four story building for Phase One and a three story building for Phase Two. At the work session, the Commission requested increased architectural detail along the I-270 frontage, which the applicant has provided through additional building relief, and the increased use of brick. The proposed development text outlines the use of natural materials including brick and stone. The preliminary elevations also indicate the use of a large amount of glass and the text should be revised to include the use of this material, as well as any additional building materials. The Commissioners also discussed the type of window glass on the building. The applicant has not identified a final material for the window glass, as it must meet the LEED certification requirements. This detail will be reviewed by Planning and the Commission at the final development plan stage. Landscaping The proposed plans and development text indicate a lazge landscape treatment along I-270 along with walls, ponds and fountains, which will occur during Phase One. The text states that the existing tree row along the southern property line and along Cosgray Creek will be used to fulfill the property perimeter screening requirements. Additional plant material will be added as necessary to ensure the required opacity. Signs The proposed development text states that corporate office signs are permitted on the I-270 building frontage, which is consistent with Code. The text also states that one ground sign is permitted at the main entrance on Emerald Parkway with the option of an additional tenant panel, should a future lot split occur. One joint identification sign will also be permitted at the shared access entrance with the southern property to provide directional assistance for service deliveries. LEED Certification The applicant is pursuing LEED certification for the site and the development text specifies the use of solar panels on the roof to reduce the dependency on electricity for the buildings. SECTION II -REVIEW STANDARDS: Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves/denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves/denies}. The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be returned to City Council for a public hearing and Planning and 7_oning Commission May 15, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0207 -Page 6 of 8 final vote. Atwo-thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. Evaluation and Recommendation based on Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan. These criteria are summarized in the following categories and may be in a different order than listed in the Code: Adopted Policies and Plans (Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4): The proposed development is consistent with the Dublin Zoning Code; is in conformity with the Community Plan; advances the general welfare of the Ciry; and the proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded. Criteria are met: The Future Land Use Plan of the Community Plan identifies the land use for this site as "Premium Off ce," which promotes high visibility office, increased access onto major arterials, and is intended to serve as major employers. It is Planning's opinion that the proposed use meets the "Premium Office" designation of the Community Plan. Parks and Open Space (Criteria S and 6): The proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives af~ the Cvmmuniry Plan; and the proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site. Criteria are met: The use of the open space area north of Cosgray Creek for parkland or nature preserve will benefit the occupants of the proposed and surrounding buildings. The preliminary development plan takes the existing natural features into account and preserves the existing tree rows in the northern and western portions of the site. Traffic, Utilities and Stormwater Management (Criteria ~, 8, and 11): Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention andlor necessary facilities have been or are being provided; and adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding puhlic streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non- conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; and adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as,far as practicahle, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas. Criteria may be met with condition: This proposal provides adequate utilities, and vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Public safety will be maintained through the provision of adequate fue apparatus access roads adjacent to the building. The applicant will need to provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's Stormwater code and flood control code (Condition 1). All compensating storage improvements must be made within the boundaries of the site, and should Reserve A be deeded to City, all compensating storage improvements must occur prior to the dedication (Condition 2). Planning and Zoning Commission May 15, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0202 -Page 7 of 8 Development Standards (Criteria 9, and 10): The relationship of buildings and structures provides for the coordinution and integration of this development to the community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; and the development standards, and the design and layout of the open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements contribute to the orderly development of land within the City. Criteria are met: The proposed layout of both phases, including building and parking locations and landscaping features provides a coordinated development. The proposed development text provides standards that will contribute to the orderly development of this site for the proposed use, setbacks, and density. The development text should be revised to incorporate the modifications outlined in this report regarding the setback requirements (Condition 3). Parking for this use is adequate and is easily accessible and connected by sidewalks to the buildings. Design Standards (12, and 13): The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Code or the Subdivision Regulations; are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; and the proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City. Criteria are met: This proposal is consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District. The proposed building desibm consists of high-quality materials and implements four-sided architecture, which complements adjacent corporate office buildings. The development text should be revised to identify all proposed building materials (Condition 3). Infrastructure (Criteria 14, 1 S and 16): The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; the proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements; and the applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sujfcient to service the new development. Criteria are met: The proposal provides appropriate infrastructure and the two phases of development are sufficiently coordinated. Required public improvements will be determined at the final development plan stage. Land Use Principles: On August 21, 2006 City Council established ten Land Use Principles to be utilized as development guidelines in conjunction with the existing Community Plan in the evaluation of pending development applications. The ten Land Use Principles are to be consulted in order to adequately address policies and decision-making processes that may arise during the Community Plan update process and are categorized and summarized as follows: Quality and Character (Principles 1, 6, 7, and 9): High quality design for all uses, recognising density has important economic implications, but is essentially an outcome not a determinant of creating a quality place; preserving the rural character of certain areas of the community, Planning and 'Coning Commission May l 5, 2008 -Planning Report Case No. 08-0202 -Page 8 of 8 including the appearance of roads, as well as the landscape; developing streets that create an attractive public realm and make exceptional places for people; and creating streets that contribute to the character of the community and move a more reasonable level of traffic. Land Use Principles met: In Planning's opinion, this proposal maintains the quality and chazacter envisioned for this area. Connectivity (Principles 2, 8 and 10): Creating places to live that have a stronger pedestrian environment, connections to convenient services, and are conducive to multi-generational living and social interaction; creating better connected places, in part, to improve the function of the street network and also to better serve neighborhoods; and providing opportunities to walk and bike throughout the community. Land Use Princip les met: This proposal includes appropriate parking locations and internal pedestrian circulation which will contribute to efficient traffic and pedestrian movement. Integration (Principles 3, 4, and 5): Creating places with integrated uses that are distinctive, sustainable and contribute to increasing the City's overall vitality; providing some retail services in closer proximity to residential areas as an important amenity to residents; and creating a wider range of housing choice in the community, as well as in new neighborhoods. Land Use Principles met: The proposed building incorporates the use of sustainable development practices, including the preservation of open space, the provision of less impervious surface through compact car spaces, underground parking area, and the use of alternative energy sources such as solar panels. SECTION III -PLANNING OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION: Approval It is Planning's opinion that this proposal is compatible with the development pattern in this azea. Based on the evaluation of this proposal according to the criteria set forth in Code Section 153.050 and the ten Land Use Principles, approval of this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan with three conditions is recommended: Conditions: 1) The applicant provide a stormwater management report that complies with the City's stormwater management plan requirements and flood control Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) All compensating storage improvements must be made to Reserve A prior its dedication, should it be deeded to City; and 3) The text be revised to incorporate comments identified within this report prior to scheduling for City Council. City of Dublin DEVELOPMENT A Land Use and / Long Range Planning CONTEXT ;'~,`-~~i;n i i rr_i~ , „, cnFeet Proposed Landscape Plan Proposed Building 2 (Phase 2) A ~~i, ~UQM1T7tD ~f(~ Lc~l)Nc;IL .~e,~C _~' `l FOR / MEE PING UN ///11//~ x~~ 08-0202 ltezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Proposed Elevations os-o2oz Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan '1 uttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Front (West) Elevation -Facing Emerald Parkway Rear (East) Elevation -Facing I-270 Proposed Signs os-o2oz Rezoning/Preliminary Development Pian "Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Proposed Wall Sign -Facing I-270 Proposed Monument Sign -Emerald Parkway Entry Feature APPROVED TEXT PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT 1.2119/97 TUTTLE NORTH EXTENSION WF,ST OF I-270 AND EAST OF EMERALD PARKWAY The site is approximately 16.143 acres. It is located along Emerald Parkway north of the existing LCI building (One Packwood Place). The parcel is intended for development as office and office related uses because of its proximity to the freeway, Britton Parkway and the office uses at'futtle Crossing and Tuttle Crossing North. The following material is provided in response to the Composite Plan contents of the PCD in the City of Dublin Zoning Code: A. Indicating by schematic plan the general development character of the tract, locations, types of tenants, probable lot size and other development features, including the perimeter landscaping, open space buffers or "no-build" zones and major pedestrian and bicycle routes. (See Composite Plan-Exhibit H) B. The proposed provisions of water, sanitary sewer, industrial waste disposal and surface drainage facilities, including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. The proposed development will have water service made available by way of a new 16" waterline under construction in conjunction with Emerald Parkway improvements. Sanitary sewer service is available through an existing 21" sanitary trunk sewer crossing the site. Storm drainage designs will outlet at the Cosgray ditch. Feasibility studies for detailed storm drainage are currently in process. C. The proposed traffic circulation pattern showing public and private streets and other transportation facilities, including their relationship to topography and existing transportation facilities with evidence that the proposed development shall not adversely impact existing facilities. The proposed development will gain access from proposed Emerald Parkway via a full service and fight-in/right-out curb cut. The site will also incorporate internal vehicular access from the existing LCI building (One Packwood Place). D. The proposed schedule of site development and associated facilities, including streets, other Transportation facilities, utilities, services and other facilities. Site development will commence when lease agreements are formally signed. There are ongoing discussions with a current corporate tenant user for this site. 08-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle Norih PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPROVED TEXT PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT 12/19/97 TU'TTLE NORTH k:XTENSION WEST OF I-270 AND EAST OF EMERALD PARKWAY PURI'()SL: The site is approximately 16.143 acres. It is located along Lmerald Parkway north of the existing LCI building (One Parkwood Place). 'The parcel is intended for development as office and office related uses because of its proximity to the freeway, Britton Parkway and the office uses at Tuttle Crossing and Tuttle Crossing North. The following rrratcrial is provided in response to the Composite Plan contents of the PCD in the City of Dublin Zoning Code: A. Indicating by schematic plan the general development character of the tract, locations, types of tenants, probable lot size and other development features, including the perimeter landscaping, open space buffers or "no-build" zones and major pedestrian and bicycle routes. (See Composite Pian-Exhibit H} B. 1'he proposed provisions of water, sanitary sewer, industrial waste disposal and surface drainage facilities, including engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness. The proposed development will have water service made available by way of a new 16" waterline under construction in conjunction with Emerald Parkway improvements. Sanitary sewer service is available through an existing 21" sanitary trunk sewer crossing the site. Storm drainage designs will outlet at the Cosgray ditch. Feasibility studies for detailed storm drainage are currently in process. C. The proposed traffic circulation pattern showing public and private streets and other transportation facilities, including their relationship to topography and existing transportation facilities with evidence that the proposed development shall not adversely impact existing facilities. The proposed development will gain access from proposed H:merald Parkway via a full service and fight-in/right-out curb cut. The site will also incorporate internal vehicular access from the existing LCI building (One Parkwood Place). D. The proposed schedule of site development and associated facilities, including streets, other Transportation facilities, utilities, services and other facilities. Site development will commence when lease agreements are formally signed. There are ongoing discussions with a current corporate tenant user for this site. i':1PASSU'LAMINUNIUl1V(1.3791PLANVEU COMMERCE DIS1RICf TEXI'.d~c 1 p 08-O20Z Rezoning/PreliminaryDevetopment Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPROVED TEXT The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public improvements. The proposed site will complement existing freeway oriented corporate users presently within the City of Dublin and Tuttle Crossing North. Surrounding uses include existing office to the south and east, existing and proposed industrial warehouse to the north and west, and proposed commercial uses to the west. F. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the land to prepare required land improvements, including street, water, sanitary sewers, waste disposal, surface drainage and other facilities for subdivision development required by the Subdivision Regulations. 7'he applicant is in contract with the owner and can provide documentation if necessary to show sufficient control over the property. G. Any deed restrictions to be made applicable to the property the subject of the application. Decd restrictions shall be provided at the time of sale of the property. lleed restrictions will be consistent to those of •l'uule Crossing and Tuttle Crossing North. Subarea Development Standards Text General Development Standards for all Subareas General Intent It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office and commercial development consistent with Tuttle Crossing, Tuttle Crossing North and Emerald Parkway. Mid-rise, signature office buildings will be promoted along freeway frontage. If these standards contliet in any way with the City of Dublin Codiftes Ordinances, then the Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Codc applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commercial District. Street plan alignments shown on the plan give a general indication of how they will be platted and constructed. They are not, however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be produced, its precise locations may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. Based on the proposed curb cuts shown on Exhibit F the developer shall provide for cross access easement when appropriate between the proposed P-C-D area and adjoining office parcels to the south. Signage and Graphics Except as otherwise herein stated: All signage and graphics shall conform to the Dublin Sign Code Section 153, Including but not limited to set back and placement, maximum size, height, color and copy restrictions, lighting, landscaping, etc. uisrki~rrEx'r.~~ 2 ~B~~ZO7i Rezoning/Preliminary llevelopment Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPROVED TEXT b. With the exception of multi-story office along I-270 that will be controlled by Section 153 of the Dublin Sign code, in no case shall a ground sign exceed a height of six feet or a maximum of 50 square feet per sign face. All ground mounted signs shall be of a "monument" design, placed on a masonry base and integrated into a landscape feature. c. For a site with at least !00 feet of frontage on each of two public streets, two signs will be permitted subject to the limitations of this text and those contained in Section 153. 3. Lighting: Except as otherwise herein state (all lighting shall meet Dublin Lighting Guidelines): a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut off type fixtures b. All types of parking, pedestrian and other lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. c. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of black or dark bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be high pressure sodium. Building and landscaping lighting may be incandescent or metal halide, e. Landscape and building uplighting from a concealed source shall be permitted. f. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. g. Al! building illumination shall be from concealed sources. h. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 4. Landscaping a. As many existing trees as possible within the boundary of the site will be preserved (See Tree Protection Plan, Exhibit E). b. Any portion of a developed lot upon which a building or parking area is not consUucted shall be landscaped with lawn as a minimum. c. All areas shall be landscaped in accordance wil.h the llublin Landscape Code and all areas will remain in agriculture or be seeded prior to development. d. The landscape treatment for Emerald Parkway shall incorporate standards as shown on F,xhibit J & K. The plan palette shall include the species shown on Exhibit ! & K. 5. Fences/Walls: a. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. b. Wood fencing which is used for screening purposes shall be permitted if fully buffered by landscaping. P:1PA.SSV't.ANVNDIVIDW(1.379V'I.ANNE~COMMERC6 DISTRICT T6XT.Jus 3 p 0$-0202 Rezoning/Prelitrtinary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPRQVED TEXT Utilities a. Al- utility lines including water supply, sanitary water service, electricity, telephone and gas, and their connections or feeder lines should be placed underground. Meters, Transformers, etc. may be placed above ground, but should be screened. from view. To the extent possible utility line piacemeat will be sensitive to existing vegetation. b. Al! utility connections should be out of view or screened. a. All mechanical equipment and related structures should be effectively screened from grade level view by a fence, vegetation, or wall of harmonious architectural material and character. d. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the buildings. Cosl,~ray Ditch Relocation Standards (Sec Exhibit I) When relocated, the following standards shall apply: The entire segment of existing Cosgray ditch within the proposed office development will be relocated to the northern portion of the sift. Engineering feasibility studies are currently underway to determine the necessary size, shape and location of the relocated ditch. It is the intent of the developer to incorporate appropriate design guidelines. Outlining the appearance of the relocated ditch. Such guidelines may include, but are not limited to the following: I. A gently meandering route for the relocate4d ditch may be incorporated of diminish the regimented, artificial appearance of arrow-sh~aighi drainage courses. 2. Varying slopes of the ditch banks may be used to soften the harshness of a continuous, uniform side slope. 3. A native vegetation palette will be used to promote or recreate the visual experience that currently exists. 4. A random planting pattern for the proposed trees, shrubs, etc. will be incorporated as a means of creating a naturalistic, "developed-over time" character. 5. Where practical, the developer will preserve signit"icant trees along the ditch row. Final determination of trees to be preserved will occur during final development plan process. F:U'ASSWLr1NVNDIVIUUlKLi79~P7.~NNE:DCOMMERCEOISTRICI"rRXT.Joc 4 OS-0202 Rezoning/Prelinninary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPROVED TEXT Subarea A Office A1.OI Description and Acreage: i. Subarea A is approximately f 16.143 acres. 5ubarca A may contain office uses similar to those uses in Tuttle Crossing. These uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office of major institutional uses. Mid-rise signature office buildings with or without parking structures wilt be promoted within Subarea A. 2. *Drive through facilities shat( be a conditional use. 3. Conditional uses as listed in the SO District may be permitted within Subarea A, subject to the conditional use procedure and approval by the Planning and %oning Commission. 4. Structured parking or parking garages shall be considered a conditional use and shall be subject to conditional use procedure and Dublin City Council approval. A1.03 Permitted Density: 1. The permitted density in this subarea shall not exceed 17.500 gross squaze feet of building area per net acre of Site with surface parking. The density may be increased with parking structures but shall be subject to conditional use and Dublin City Council approval. A1.04 Traffic and Circulation: t . Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Emerald Parkway. 2. Curb cuts on Ernerald Parkway shall be as shown on Exhibit F. The curb cut locations maybe modified with the approval of the Dublin City Engineer. 3. A full service curb cut shalt be provided at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. 4. Aright-ir>/right-out curb cut shall be provided on the northern portion of the proposed office development if City Engineers determines it is necessary. The proposed relocation of Cosgray Ditch shall occur in conjunction with the Emerald Parkway improvements. It is the intent of the developer to locate the right-in/right-out south of the relocated Cosbnay Ditch (See Exhibit F). A1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and Loading facilities shall be regulated by City of Dublin 1.,oning Code. 2. All loading docks shall be screened according to City of Dublin Zoning Code. A1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks off I-270 shall be 50' for all pavements areas and 193' for buildings, on Emerald Parkway Extended, shall be 30' for all pavement areas, 50' for buildings. (See Exhibit G) '~ 12/17/98 Dublin City Council Revision (KL) P:\PASS\PLANUNDIVIDU\KL3)9\PLA`NF:D COMMGRCE DISTRICT TEXT ~h,c S p r~ 08-0202 Rczoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS F,merald Parkway APPROVED TEXT 2. Side yards shalt be IS' for pavement and 30' for buildings 3. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. (See Exhibit G) 4. All other publicly dedicated local streets shad have a 2S' pavement setback and SO' building setback. 5. *Per City of Dublin Code maximum lot coverage shall be 70%. For building 6 stories and over lot coverage may exceed 709b with conditional use approval from the City of Dublin. AI.07 Height Requirements: That the text be amended to limit the height of the building, from I-270 to 600 feet west, to a maximum of sevens stories and 96~ feet, including parapet, and the remaining area on the site be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet including parapet. A1.08 Waste and Refuse: Alt waste and refuse shalt be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence (if fully screened by landscaping), or materials consistent with the building materials, or depressing the grade. A1.09 Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall he screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. AI.IO Landscaping 1. All landscaping shall be according to the City of Dublin Zaning Code. 2. Landscaping along Emetald Parkway shall be as shown on Exhibit J, K, L that conforms to Emerald Parkway landscape plan. 3. Additional landscaping shall be provided ac all foil service curb cuts from Emerald Parkway. (See exhibit J,K,L) 4. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be landscaped with lawn at a minimum. 5. All healthy trees located within the building and pavement setbacks will be preserved if possible. 6. It is the intent of the Developer to provide a unified landscape treatment along Subarea A's I-270 frontage. The landscape treatment shall incorporate a combination of plant material and earth mounding. 'The design intent of the landscape treatment shall be to provide a visual buf'fcr (minimum 6' height adjacent to vehicular use areas. Areas within the I-270 frontage where office buildings are located shall be augmented with plant material or lawn panels in lieu of the required 6' mound. (See Exhibits J,K,L) 12/17/98 Dublin City Council Revision (KL) OS-0207 Rezoning/Preliminary Develaptnent Plan 'Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway APPROVED TEXT Al.ll Architecture: A. General Architecture. Buildings should be designed to be seen from three hundred sixty degrees (360) degrees, and in this respect there must be not a higher quality of design on the front of the Building than the back or sides of the Building. There must be a consistency of quality around the entire perimeter. Building additions, whether attached or detached, shall be of similar or compatible design and materials. B, ite and Detailed Desisn. The site shall be designed to create a distinctive Class A office campus environment. Buildings shall be articulated and scaled to create a cohesive office campus. Particular attention shall be given to the portion of the buildings fronting I-270 and Emerald Parkway. Where appropriate, the palette of materials and colors shall complement the adjacent Parkwood One Building. Creative solutions to site parking lots shall be encouraged. If Pianning and Zoning approves a parking structure as conditional use, the architectural design and materials shall complement and be integrated with the office structures. 'to the extent that the market allows, mixed uses such as restaurants or delis shall be incorporated into the design. C. Mechanical Enuipment Any external mechanical equipment should be totally screened from view with materials that are similar to or the same as used on the majority of the Building or if screened by Landscaping the same shall provide on hundred percent (100%) opxcit.y. This would include any satellite dishes, as well as ground mounted mechanical equipment. The screening of the mechanical equipment must be coordinated with the rest of the architecture so as to avoid being seen as an "add-on". ll. Exterior I3uildins Materials. Precast concrete must have warm coloration. It is acceptable to accomplish this through the use of color and mixtures or inclusion of stone chips. Relief such as reveals and minor color changes are encouraged to add detail and warmth to the precast concrete. Masonry used as wither the entire enclosure or partial enclosure of the Buildings within any particular color range must be relatively uniform. In this respect, the intent. is to exclude the use of brick that would present a spotty looking facade (i.e. Colonial brick). However, this is not intended to exclude the potential for using different colors of brick to create architectural accents. Untreated masonry block or prefabricated metal buildings are prohibited. Stone such as limestone, granite and some varieties of marbles are encouraged to either be used as the dominant Building material or as accents to ocher Building materials. A1.12 ~rnding of infrastructure: The developer shall enter into a tax incremental finance agreement with the City to fund Woerner-Temple Road construction improvements. This agreement shall be produced and signed by January 31, 1998. P:IPKSSIPLAMINDIVIDUUCLJ'/9Wk.ANNEDCOMb{fiRC$DISTRIC?'CP.XT.Joe as-o2oz Rczoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway CITY OF DUBLIN_ ~a ~.. as a~w aw. n~..rn9 5800 Shier~ings Road DubBn, Ohio 130 1 6-1 236 Phcxie! TAD: b I NIOJ600 Fax 614414{747 Web Sile: www.ckibin.ah.ui PLANNllYG AND ZONING COMMISSION WORKSESSION RECORD OF DISCUSSION APRIL 10, 2008 3. Tuttle North PCD -IGS Emerald Parkway 08-0202 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Proposal: Two corporate office buildings totaling 176,400 square feet with associated site improvements within the Tuttle North PCD, Planned Commerce Development District. The site is located on the east side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Request: Review and feedback of a rezonint,/preliminary development plan application to rezone the property from PCD, Planned Commerce District to PUU, Planned Unit Development District under the provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: David C_ Warner, IGS; represented by Gary Smith, Bird Houk Collaborative. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planner [I. Contact Information: (614) 410-4690, jrauch@dublin.oh.us RESULT: The Planning and `Coning Commission informally reviewed this rezoning application and were supportive of the construction of two corporate office buildings. The Commissioners requested that the applicant provide additional perspective drawings showing how the proposed building will be sited given the reduced building setback from Interstate 270. The proposed architecture was generally well received, but the Commissioners requested additional architectural articulation along the building elevation that faces [-270, as well as additional landscaping within the I-270 buffer_ The Commission discussed the improvements associated with Reserve A and encouraged its use as a park or open space area. STAFF CERTIFICATION i"t/tann P~ a cJ ~GG S '~ Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II 08-020L Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD -IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission April 10, 2008 -Minutes Page 4 of 10 3. Tuttle North PCD -CGS Emerald Parkway 08-0202 Rezoning/C'reliminary Development Plan WORK SESSION Mr. Walter stated that his firm works for the applicant, but currently is not engaged in any work. fie said that should that happen at some point, he would need to recuse himself from anything further with this case. Claudia Husak presented this request for informal review and feedback of a proposed preliminary development plan to rezone this site to a PUD, Planned Unit Development District. She explained that this application focuses on modifying certain requirements within the existing development text to allow the construction of two corporate office buildings for IGS. She reported that an Economic Development Agreement was approved by City Council on April 7`~. She said during that review, site plans and elevations were presented and generally, City Council favorably received them. She said after a recommendation of the formal application by the Commission, it will be forwarded to City Council for a final vote. Ms. Husak said the 16-acre site is located between I-270 on the east, and Emerald Parkway on the west at the intersection with Innovation Drive. She said adjacent developments to the south include corporate office buildings, the Qwest Building to the south, and to the southwest, the recently approved Gardner School and BMI which are under construction. Ms. Husak said the proposed site plan shows the two corporate buildings in the eastern portion of the site. She said the larger, approximately 100,000-square-foot building located along I-270, can accommodate underground parking and is four stories high. Ms. Husak said in the second phase a 75,000-square-foot, three-story building is proposed with parking located in the center of the site. She said Reserve A, to the north of the site, includes the Cosgray Ditch floodplain. Ms. Husak said the main entrance is at the Innovation Drive intersection and includes a main drive out to the front of the buildings with a traffic circle. She said a secondary access point is proposed that will be shared with the Qwest site to the south and it is intended for delivery and service uses for both sites. She said a retention pond, extensive landscaping, and terraced areas are proposed along the I-270 frontage. Ms_ Husak said the main reason for the proposed rezoning is a condition that was added by City Council at the Tuttle North PCD rezoning which required that the building setback be 193 feet away from I-270. She said the applicant is proposing to place the buildings closer to I-270 to allow for the parking away from the highway frontage and have more of a landscaped, softer feel there. She said the proposed setback is 100 feet. Ms. Husak explained that the rezoning is necessary because the required setback is contained in the development text. Ms. i-Iusak said the applicant has submitted architectural elevations and the proposed materials include brick, stone, and expanses of glass. She said the proposed underground parking will be along the lower portions of the building which will also blend with the overall architecture. Ms. Husak requested the Commission provide informal feedback for the applicant and Planning on the three discussion points outlined in the memorandum provided in the packets: i . The development pattern along Interstate 270 is emphasized by larger scale multi-story corporate office buildings and parking is predominantly located fTOm view; does the OS-0202 Rczoning~Preliminary Development Plan 'Tuttle North PCD -IGS Emerald Parkway t?ubtin Planning and Zoning Commission April 10, 2008 -Minutes Page 5 of 10 Planning and Zoning Commission support the decreased setback to conceal the parking and allow a landscape buffer along I-270? 2. The text promotes mid-rise, signature office buildings along the interstate; does the proposed architecture meet this intent and provide the high-quality design for corporate office? 3. The northern portion of the site has limited development potential due to its location in the floodplain; would the Commission support an open space or park use within this area of the site? The applicant, David Warner, CFO, Interstate Gas Supply (IGS), provided a brief background of the company. He said currently they have 1 SO employees and SO contract employees in thrcye non-contiguous office spaces on Bradenton Avenue. He said they are looking to create a corporate campus type of environment, using other projects such as Ashland and Cardinal for design guidance. Jim Houk, Bird Houk Collaborative, representing the applicant, said this site was originally planned and designed for a sister building to the existing Quest building with parking continued across the frontage. He said that previously the zaning proposal included the relocation of Cosgray Ditch to expand the developable area of the site. Mr. Houk said this first building will be constructed as a LEED certified building. Ile said they did not want to relocate the ditch and remove the existing tree row and IGS did not want the image of their corporate headquarters from I-270 to be a pazking lot with a building behind it. lie said they worked closely with the City to relocate the existing right-in/right-out design to function into a joint one between both properties. He said that would allow them to bring service trucks to the service areas for IGS and Qwest instead of the front entry of the building. Mr. 1louk said they are proposing a series of walls stepping down to a landscaped terrace with a pond and patio. He said the density will not be increased. He said if the City does not accept all the park land, they would like to add public bike paths connections with easements. Gary Sebach, Bird Houk Collaborative, briefly described the traditional-style architecture. He said to make it feel more corporate, they propose to use brick and cast stone to look like limestone. Flite Freimann asked how the fountain, terrace, and patio features would look from I-270. Mr. Sebach said as graded today, the finished floor is about at freeway level, so the grading goes down to the pond, it comes back up with landscape buffering and part of the exposed Dublin stone foundation will be seen behind the landscape buffering, and then transition to the building itself. He said driving by, it would be at eye level, similar to the Nationwide building. He said the plaza level was the same as the finished floor. He said the water elevation is ten feet below the plaza area. Chris Amoroso Groomes asked what the floodplain elevation immediately to the north was. Todd Cunningham, EMH&T said the fload elevation is at 894 at I-270, and 897 along Emerald Parkway. IIc said the finished floor of the building is at 902, about eight feet above the flood elevation clang 1-270. He said the high elevation of the pond is 891 and the lowest tier of the terrace is 895. 08-0207. Rczoninh;Prelinunary Development Pian Tuttle North PCD - 1GS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission April to, 2008 -Minutes Page 6 of t0 Mr. Walter noted that the building will stick out from Safety Solutions and Qwest. He asked if the building sign locations have been contemplated. Mr. Houk demonstrated the sign location they were considering. Mr. Walter said the location of the building sign was important because of the site's constraints. EIe said he thought the contemplated location was good. He said he thought this building coordinates well with the Cardinal project and looked similar in nature. Mr. Walter suggested deferred parking should be considered on this lot, instead of the proposed parking. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked how many employees could be housed in the Phase I building. Mr. Warner said the Phase I building would house up to 450 employees, and up to 750 employees could be housed in the two buildings proposed. Mr. Houk said a total of 728 parking spaces were proposed on surface and 66 spaces in the garage. He said they proposed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 feet, which exceeds Code. Ted Saneholtz asked if there was any impediment to moving both buildings back toward the west, away from I-270. Mr. Houk said the only reason they were requesting this change to the zoning was to move the building 85 feet to allow for adequate parking to support the use of the building. Mr. Waiter said his only concern was that from I-270, the wall structure and landscaping will not be seen. Mr. Houk said the building plaza level will be at about grade with I-270. He assures that the water would be seen. He said what was driving the water level was that there are some Landmazk trees, and in order to preserve them, there cannot be a lot of grading. Ms. Husak suggested that a view shed or perspective drawing be provided when this proposal comes back before the Commission. Mr. Saneholtz asked if the light colored areas on the building were EIFS. Mr. Sebach said they were considering a thin limestone veneer 18 by 18 panel that can be rotated to provide scale and texture. Mr. Langworthy said he had discussed the proposed pazkland dedication with Fred Icahn who suggested that informal open space should be provided for corporate residents where employees could enjoy it. Ms. Amorose Groomes suggested something helpful with connectivity would be a staged exercise area that would benefit other corporate residents at lunchtime. Mr. Zimmerman suggested something like the five-acre park behind Washington Township Administration building would be nice. He said it was manicured on the outer fringes only. Mr. Freimann noted that at night from I-270 the inside of offices on the upper floors of the former BMW Financial Services building could he seen. He said if he saw from I-270 a beautiful building and vista, then he could definitely support this rezoning. He said when this comes back for final approval, he would like to see the proposed building and features as would be seen from I-27U. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if the glass was reflective. Mr. Sebach said a warm bronze glass was being proposed. He said since the building is to be LEED certified, a high performance glass needs to be used, which requires a reflective glass. a8-o2oz RezoningJl'retirrunary Development Ptan `Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission April 10, 2008 -Minutes Page7of10 Mr. Walter said this building feels very close, but the site might require that. He pointed out that when the proposal comes back for zoning approval, good renderings will help the discussion of that point. He said any enhancement to the front side so that there is more gareen space and trees along the expanse of the building would be good. He said the only concern the Commissioners had was that it was such a big building close to I-270 that it needed to be buffered. Mr. Saneholtz noted that the west side of this building was much more attractive to him than what the rendering showed the east side would be. He said it looked very straight and there was not a lot of interest in the architecture on the east side of the building, however he liked the flared roofline. Mr. Saneholtz said this is a very attractive building, but he encouraged more interest be added than the straight long side up to the road. He echoed Mr. Freimann's comment about seeing inside offices from I-270. He said overall, this is a very interesting project that has a lot of positive merit to it. Mr. Walter echoed Mr. Saneholtz's comments about making the east side elevation more interesting. Mr. Fishman said when the first building is constructed; he would like to see something done with the Reserve and also the Phase II site should be landscaped similar to what Cardinal had done so that it has a finished look even before the building is constructed. He wanted it all to be coordinated at once. Mr. Houk said they will put in a finished lawn on the future site, and i f the City does not want the park land, they will maintain it naturally. Mr. Zimmerman said he liked the water feature in the front because driving along the highway you will look into it and at the landscaping. He suggested that the back elevation be enhanced. He echoed the comment regarding Reserve A and said his thoughts were similar to Mr. Hahn's. Mr. I,angworthy clarified that developing Mr. Hahn's suggestion would depend on the City's budget. Mr. Zimmerman said he was fine with the decreased setbacks. He said he appreciated that 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet were being proposed because of the need instead of just meeting Code. He confirmed there were no other Commission questions and that PIanning and the applicant had received the needed answers. 4. Tanning Presentatio My Neighbo ood Project T 's presentation was post ned prior to the meetin .There was no discussio . Administrativ usiness Mr.Limm ~ an commented that t Commission had bee eviewing every applic• vn at a Work ssion and he questions why. Steve I.angwort said Planning origina planned to bri all applications to th ~ otnmission Work Se ' ins until it was deters ed which ones eedcd to go through th ~ ew process. 0()-0201. Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - [GS Emerald Parkway ,.~ --- KECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ?Minutes o; _ - iVleeting Mayor ' ansntber called the meeting to rder Mr einer led the Pledge of Allegi c. I II Council members press vets Mayor Kranstt `icCash, dir. Peters , his. Hide Pittaluga, an: Staff members p ent were: \•f r. Hansley, dir. ;McDaniel, , .Harding, ~Ir. Ivndra, Chief " \fr. Le , ~ fr. Husenitza, ~1s. Clarke, \ir ar at 7:00 p.rti. ~yor Boring, Mr. Adamek, net. ;\ls. Grigsby, \ir. Smith, A,~ ~iayror Kranstuber moved ap val of the rrinutcs of the Febn 2 meeting. \Ir. ~icCash seconded th lotion, \~e~n the motipy - c Reiner, yes; i\Ir. AicCash, yc , . It. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adams -, yes; ~4rs. Boring, s; ~•fayor Kranstuber, yes; his. tde Pittalu~.l, yes rr 1 The C -reported that two notices ~~~ sent to Council requesting ap val of liquor p it transfers: Crescendo Pastari n Riverside Drive transferred m Abbey's Country estauran[; B~\'3's a: P:rimeter ent Littl~joh~ & Co., Inc. on T er Road. There vas no objection f:~ ouncil to the transfer of these rmits. 1Vallace ~4au~r 'l,~51 Dublin Road addressed C .Weil reg:,rdins severs! matters: 1) He wed when Councrl will vote on ... Sycamore Ridge 2 cor:cept pl as its did t believe there vas amale nppo ni:y for public input. i`•fa ~ ~ Kranstuber c~plained that tl+e after had been tabled ~rtviousl y Council until nigh!, and the applicant is requ Ing that this item be left on the 1e until March 3. 2) He indicated that he ~ - s surprised by the recent voter rding the soccer stadium. He added that he tpathized with the property ow rs who would have been affected by t tadiunt project. 1\Ihilc many fa ies felt that the stadium ~voul have prov~ ed Wrote opportunities for child to play and practice soccer, t realit 'as that the stadium would hav cn•ed only the professional soc r team. 3) stied what the City will now d vith the property purchased for a stadium. is suggestion is that it be use or soccer practice fields for chi en, 4 Council should poll Dublin 'tuns regarding tl:cir desires fo a use of this property. i'1 lesson lest d from all oFthis is it is difiicul o assess the opinion of the citizenry. Cou ~ should now carry forth this ci '_en effort to determine what to do with the aen~•. .1 Aiayor I:r tuber presented representative the Dublin Scioto High Scho 4arching !~ Band ~ • t a proclamation in recognilio their achievements at the slat nd regional ;i ba competitions. I-Ie thanked the cntbers Cor their participation a for their ': omributions to enhance the qu. ~ v of life fer Dublin citizens. • - Staff Conupcnts ~ Thcrc were no com: ms from staff h It I 5ccond Rcadin<~ .~ Ihlblir Ilc:n•inr - Ordin:+nccs ~ ) Ordiu:u+ce No. 13G-97 - :fin Ordinance i'rm'itfing for a CI::+nge in ""/.oning for 16_td3 ~ ~ :~r.res L.UC:t1cd ltCt\1CCtl ~l'f0I)OSCd) }.IIICr:lld I':11'I:N':1\' :+nd 1-270 South of Shamrock Court,:lpprozimatcly l,_00 Fcct South oCShicr-12ings Road, from: L1, Limited ~; lndustriat UisU'icl and ill, licstricted Industrial DislriU, tu: 1'CD, I'lanncd it Commerce District (:1t Emerald P:u•kway, !'base J) (Applicant: Duke Realty Limited r Partnership, Mark l f Gialluca, -1700 Lakchurst Court, Suite 1~0, Dublin, OH •t3017) 'i Mfr \1cCash stated that he sill abstzin from this matter and Icft Council Champ^~~ 08-0202 Rezotung/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dlinutes of _ _ . , _ Meeting _ Dubl:a City Council \4eetins Pace 2 ;\Is. Clarke stated this application is for a rezoning of 1G acres located between I-270 and Emerald Park+vay, nonh of Rings Road, and south of Shier Rings Road. It is currently zoned Limited Industrial and is :orally unde+•eloped. There is a small stream running through the properly. It +vas always been expected this site would be used for an industrial site, so siaff is +•ery pleased with this application .which ++•ill permit an office campus to be developed. She presented slides of the site and surrounding area. This application was rerie++•ed by Planning Commission in January and they recommended approval +vith l3 conditions: 1. That the development text b~ revised to assure that imaginative building and site design be used to create a distincti+•e ot3ice environment per the City Council's direction; 2. That the building and parl-irg setbacks. be +•aried along I-270 ++•ith a minimum setback of ~0 feet; 3. That the existing tree ro+vs are presen•ed and integrated (including the Cosgray Ditch as far as practicable) +vitlt the o.•~rall building, parking and landscape design including a minimum of grading and the : elocation of utilities, if necessary; 4. That fencing be placed mound all trees designated for preservation and during all phases of construction; 5. That the landscaping along En;::rald Para+•ay be consistent +vith the City's Emerald Park+eay Landscape Plan; 6. Tltat the landscape treatment along I-270 be consistent with the 1-270 landscape plan submitted +vith Tuttle Crossing ~onh Section 3, Subarea A; 7. Tirat adequate right-of ++~ay be dedicated fo.f the ttrminus of Shamrock Court and be desicned to ntinimunt turn-around specifications by the applicant prior to building conswcti.+n; S. That the future devetopnrent plan allo++•s for a pedestrian link to service a transit stop; 9. That a drainage ;!tidy be completed addressing the relocation of Cosgray Ditch an3 meeting the City's storm water guidelines and manaeement plan; 10. That the text be amended to treat structured parking or a parking garage as a conditional use; 1 l . That the text be amended to limit the height of the building, +vithin 600 feet of I-370, to a maximum of eight stories and 110 feet including parapet, and the remaining area on the site be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet, including parapet; 12. That the applicant and staff meet with the fire and safety officials to determine if there is a need for emergency access to Shamrock Court; and 13. That the text be amended to include all of the commitments made by the applicant at the January S, 199S Planning Commission meeting. 1~he vote ++•as 6-0 by the Planning Commission, and staff is recontntendins approval of this application to City Council. i`4r. Reiner indicated his concern ,rith the small setback from 370. \1s. Clarke responded that 50 fret is the minimum setback and that is for parking. \tr. Hale has agreed to stagger the 5uildings A1r. f~damck noted that his und~rstandir:g ++•as that Council's direction to P&7. was to have greater setbacks along tl:e f ee++~ay, and this proposal includes minimum setbacts ++ith ~ building closer to the frce:vzy than the current LCI building. Mfr Rcincr asked about tba he:<: ;t of the proposed parkins garage. \fs. Clarke responded that s:; Ica:red parking is a conditional use in this application 2nd would be disuctionar~~ \fr Reiner indicated that tl:c .~~ includes a mesa of pessibiiitics, but no commitment ~; about what will be built on 11.C ~~te !' ~4s Clarke responded that +ri.e'~ a user is identified, the plan +vill be brought to PR:Z. dlr. Reiner asked if the olio ~: h~; ;user for this site. ~. \is. Garkc responded that the a »licant arould have to respond to this. ~ ' \ir. liei:+is stated that the applicant testified at the Planning and %oning Corr 08.0202 Rezoning/Prelitninary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEI=DINGS DIinutes of _-_ - •_AIe_ting - ' Dublin City Council Meeting I aee ~ ,q~ meeting that their goal is to c~zend the LCI campus northward. StafFis not ~ recommending structured pzrkin~ in this corridor as it has not been justified. The density is consistent with the Communit}' Plan ap ' >> or less. ~..nen~.. 14r. Feterson stated that the size of the buildings seem larger than others in the area. The parking as shown may be too dose to the neighborhood. He asked if it4s. Clarke was comfortable with :he amount ~f input and discretion the Cit}• would have as this project goes ;orvard. \is. Clarke stated that staff has experienced little difficulty with the aesthetics in ofitce use construction. Industrial uses or :grail uses have generated more difTiculty in this area Stat3-believes that the market renditions provide protection to the City re3arding the aesthetics of this project. She added that the current LCI building could have been a ntaxintunt of 110 feet tall, but the~• chose rot to do that. Staff's expectation is that these buildir,cs w•iil not be 110 Ccet tali, but nn one can provide that guarantee. Mrs. Boring and ;\fr. Reiner expressed concern as well about the height of the buildings and of the parking stntcture. A4r. ~damek stated that Dublin currently has no above ground parking facilities. He believes this plan is too vague. He flax assembled five pages of concerns about the text. This a piece of prime real estate along the I-270 corridor, and he would like to see a signature. building on it. He would like the parking garage totally eliminated. his. Clz:ke responded that star: has gained confidence w•i;h this developer in view of Tuttle Crossing. The major criticism she has heard is that the architecture should be more excitint • Ben Hale 37 \1'. }3roatl j•Irea_ Cc+lumbus Ohio representing the applicant stated tha[ he previously worked on the Thomas Kohler site ~+•ith Duke, and the standards That are bei:,g set for this site arc in excess of those Cor Thomas Kohler. He clarified that the parking garage is proposed as a conditional use. He noted that if LCI is going to stay in their present location, tttcy need to expand to the north. Duke has a record of commitmen[ to quality standards, and this wih be a Class rl off ce building in a campus environment. b1r. Hunter is committed to meeting Dublin's standards with this development as he has done with other developments in Dublin. min Hunter Duke Beal}; stated that they would Gke to create an even higher quality of architectural design for this office park. The Thuntas Kohler iuopeny was zoned to PCD, and the application was worked on by several community groups. At this time, he does not hati•e specifics for development of this site and he is asking for flexibility nn the City's part. He has committed to "distincti~.•e" architecu,re and to the palette of materials with staff Duke believes in partnership and has ahvays participated is the dialogue among f&7, the community and Council \9r. H21e added that Duke is ol2nning to invest S3 million m Dublin with this f:roject. \Ss Hide Pitutluga asked t'tc applicant Io comment on the setback from the freeway \lr l iantcr responded tha; this was discussed at Icngtl: at the Planning Commission in term; of tltc relationship bct•.~cen the setbacks from t-tc neighborhood and from the Gec•.v::~• 'lltcy have co;r.r::i;tcd ;o ntaunding and landscaping; along I-270 to mitigate the pati;tng loi vice: Garr 27ti GIs. !ltdl: PllliflULa COUr:1:Cais:Q Ural( the vic•~~ from l-^ ;t) is more of a concern to her as she bdicves ;hat ot;icc budc!inL; max good ncighb;xs for residcnti2l arras S1;c stand that sine Duke has a i;ood his;on n itlt Dublin, sl:c is co.nfonable with their commitments ~; ~1r, lZeiner a~,ain indicated l:is ronccrn with the va!;ue~css of tills plan as shown in the draa.istg submitted Ile ,s rorccrncd with the ~ icw front lar,rald Parkway as well as from f-270 :\ potential user e~~:d pressure tL-e dc~cloprt [n make citanees in such a va_~uc os-ozoz Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~Iittutes of fleeting , plan \4r. Hale indicated they arc willing to ~ri;hdraw the exhibit submitted with the application due to the concerns expressed by Council. • i\Ir. Hunter added that it is difficult to be specific before they have teen engaced by a client. In tact, this test is more restrictive than any PCD this City has ever considered. He believes Duke is a good partner for the City and asks City Council to allow them the flexibility to perform. Mr. Reiner stated that he is not concerned +vith the land use, but wit;t the site plan and the diagram presented. He Etas a responsibility to the citizenry' he serves. \4r. Hunter stated that they gill abide by the density set in the recently adopted Conmtunity Plan. i\4r. AdamektAmmented :hat the residents in this community are supportive of office development, but he shares dir. Reincr's concerns with the quality of the development. He emphasized his concern ~+-ith tt~e proposed parking garages on the site. \1r. Hale suggested that Council add a condition that the parking garage be brought back for Council review. ~4r. rldamek commented that he would like further information about .vhy the applicant dots not want to extend Shamrock Drive to this property. A4r. Hunter responded that the Wage consultant did not recommend it. The Police and Fire departments have indicated that access is not a problem as presently co~gured. ;\fr. Peterson asked for affirmation that if the applicant comes bzck and wants approval of a parkirg garage, and City Council does not approve the garage, the office building will not be built. \~1r. Hunter responded that they +vill build the office building even without ttte parking garage. The cars will go on a surface lot. Vice Mayor Boring im~ited those in the audience to come forward and testify on this matter. ~d 7_imm~rman. 5(z$2 Kentfie-d Drive. Brighton Park stated that the neighbors' main concern is ~vitlr the structured parking. This has nol been done previously in Dublin. He moved to the suburbs to avoid this t} pe of development which has been done in Columbus. Mr. ~damek asked \7•r. Hunter if he woutd commit to move the building back front the highway to be more in line with the current LCI building. VTr. Hunter stated that they can adjust the setback to 150 feet. A4ayor Kranstuber stated that he is oat concerned about the setback from the freeway bu: rather with the aesthetics of Fnurald Parkway. \Ir. Reiner stated that he does not want the applicant to waste his tintc on parking garage pilau H.: doesn't warm to set another precedent !'or oQicc parks by allowing parkirg ~zragcs \Irs. Boring asked if there is any ccm:niu+.utt to lower the height in keeping with the "I homas Kohler devcloprncnt ~1r Hunicr responded that the hcigh; at S stories is to++cr than that of "fhomas Kohler which is 10 stories \1rs [3orin~ stated that Counrl s attempting to set the standards up (root opt this apphcatior Uther concerns sftc has are ~eitir the Cramer ditch relocation. \ir. Ftalc responded that they ++•ill cse appropriate materials so that the result is a creek ~8-IJZ~Z Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway RECrJRD OF PROCEEDINGS \kinutcs of __ . . •-~ 71..t.?:.- f:~.~~r~nunril \fnptiro which meander. This is included in :he text. ~drs. Boring asked for conrirmation that this would be subject to approval by the City's storm w2ter consultants. Mr. Hale responded agirnati.~ely. !tor. Smith summarized the proposed amendments to the rezonatg: the applicant would present any stnctured parking p12n for the site to City Council for their approvai; the applicant has agreed to move the building back to match the sight line with the current LCI. Mr. Hale stated that they also agree to restrict the height to 7 stories. Mayor Kranstuber suggested that Council delay any amendment on the setback until a determination is made of hot+' many and what size buildings will be on the site. Mayor Kranstuber moved to amend the conditions to providC that any structured parking requests come back to Council for approval. Ms. Hide Pittaluga seconded the rtotien. y9te on the motior. - A1r. Reiner, no, ~Zr. Peterson, yes; `ir. Adamek, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Jis. Kde Pittaluga, yes. Tor. Smit~t noted that l•fr. 'ckale has agreed that the building will be seven stories in knight, riot eight srorics~s presently rzt:arded in the text. \4ts. Boring moved that the height :equirentent be a maximutn of seven stories. Ms. Clarke clarified that would bring dott'n the height from 1 t0 to 96 feet. nor. Adamek seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, no; ;\tr. Peterson, yes; ~4rs. Bring, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, }•es; i•4r. Adamek, yes. Mayor Kranstuber asked about the rtmaining issue of setback. Mr. Adamek moved that the minimum setback from the free+vay be that of the LCI building. (Mr. Hale tvilk provide this figure to staff for insertion into the text.) Ms. Hide Pittaluga seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, }•cs; Ms. Bide Pittaluga, yes; i\frs. Boring, yes; )lfapor Kranstuber, yes; A1r. Peterson, no, ~Ir. Reiner, no. Mrs. Boring commented that the amendments are good, but she is still concerned with the vagueness of the text. Ms. Hide Pittaluga noted that she has no further comments. Mr. Peterson slated that he undcrst2nds the need for this kind of development to maintain the tax base, but there seem to be r.?any unanswered questions. FIc asked Ivtr, Smith if there arc an legal impediments to Council disapproving a request for approval of a parking stnrcturc any,+~hcrc on the site. ~Qr. Smith responded that Council could amend [he text to state that there shall be no parking garages on this site Mayor Kranstuber darificd that the question is whether Council has total discretion over whether or not a parking str•;tire «ould Iatcr be appro+•ed. ~4r. Smith responded that a p::rkin; an?cure is a conditional use, and there is no Iegal rcquirc:ncnt that it be giecn any run idcration. `4r, Adamek stated that he is pleased that Dukc is intcresteti in dct•cloping this property, and his intention is to have an acs:hc;ically pleasing development. His reason for voting against the amendment on tha parin~~ stnrcturc is that he does not want to have garages on commercial oevcloprnem sites 08-0202 Rezoning/Prelitninary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCcED(NGS Minutes of _... .,..r.r:.: r:,:, r,,;,.;,.:t a~r,:.rt~„- - .. Pao ~-- i ~~te on the ojdin•+n ~ - \1r. Peterson, yes; ivSs. Hide P:ttaluga, yes; Mrs. Boling, no; Mr. Adamek, yes; A4ayor Kra~stuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, no. • prdina a No. 06-95 - An Ordinance rovidittg for a Change in Zo ng for 197 'F 1~cr of Land Located on the So .east Corner of Post Road/S 61 and Houchard ad, front R-SR, Suburban sidential District and LI, Li cd Industrial District _ (\Vashington Tv~~nship Z ng Districts) to: PCD, Plan Commerce District. (Soccer Stadium-76S« st Road) (Applicant: Ttmeth ~. Hensley, laity ofa.rubiin, S2 Emerald Parltivay, D in, OH 43017) '` ~4r. Helwig state .a! based upon the rcferendu •ote last week, it is staffs i recommenda~' n to deny this rezoning Chang n the ~xeeks ahead, staff wil ok at 1 alter~ativ cenarios and possibilities fort t land. There is a general con sus rot to rush t ouglt that process, but ra}her every deliberate and though in looking at al natives that would best serve a community. - ir. Smith corontented that th rge tract of land purchased fo a stadium has now been ,t annexed to the City along th a portion of Casgray park, sling !72.S0 +!- acres. The annexation was effect. • on February 4, 149S. Diayor Kranstu r invited those present to co onvard and testify on this ma r. ~ ~• \ro one ca onvard. \irs oring asked a•hy a determine ' n about this land would be of •gh priority to the ~ y in view of the-~•orkload at s time. ~ '~ \fr. Hensley resFo:tded that a City has funds tied up in tl~e and, and since some of it will likely be sold, it would •e sense to make that deterati ion sooner than later. (~ M:. Smith added the a City holds an option on th _ acres to the south and staff is ~ to give Councils a scenarios on the traffic im t of various types of develop t. i A~fayor K tstuber stated that he would, rcciate staff providing a range options vertu limited recommendation. 1 A .Smith noted that he will me Council on the legal ways of d' osing of property. ! Ms. Hide Pittaluga requc d that staff' provide an accoun ' g of all of the expenses ~I incurred to date rega ng the stadium project - miscel eous fees, consultants' time, it , staff time if it tan a quantified s•r that Caurcil kn •s what investment has already en made in the la prior to any decision being m e. Mr. H slcy commented that the land increased value now as it is a erred to the City an as access to ~vxter and sewer. I t Ms. Hide Pittaluga moved [ staffprovide Council ~.ith a accounting ofal! expenditures involved ~ ' the stadium, including, but n invited to consultants, legal fees, travel expense ,staff rime, land purchase, end er related items. i\4r. McCash se ndcd the motion. V h i - ~1r. Reiner, yes; Mr. ash, }•zs; Mr. Peterson, yes; . r.~la:..zk, ~I yes; Mr oring, yes; ~4ayor Kranstube es; ivfs. Hide Pittaluga, yes. , ~` i j I ayor Kranstuber eomatcnted t members of the F..a.C.T. gro who opposed the :~ stadium are present tonight. a noted ,ltat the campaign incl ed lots of citizen y mvolvcment, and was a ~ , ~+cil rc:t and clean effort. H uggestcd that at some time in ~~ ~' the next few months a(1'give consideration to upc:a ~ g the community surveys done ~' i. is back in 1946. C ncil can discuss this further at al seeing. \~ote on r inzn-~ • ,~Ir. ~fcCash, no ~,r. Reiner, no; Mr. Peterson, n , t r. Adamek, !~ no; «` .Boring, no, ~•fa}•or Kranstub~ , no; its. Hide Pittaluga, no. ., ~: • • rUiu:utcc \o. 07-93 - :\n O inancc ,lntcnding the tuner' tal Table of Organization for the Cit of llublin. • OS-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COZVtMISSION RECORD OF ACTION January 8, 1998 ~ 111 ~~~~ 1~1 ici i~ t.t rl~.d. saias sly-w~ R~ t>vii~q Ohio~301i-1436 t'6oe~/iDa i1~1i1~550 Fm~: i14-Ti1~566 IM~6 Sim vrr.du6in.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning Application 97-1322 -Composite Plan - At Emerald Parkway, Phase 4 Location: 16.143 acres located between proposed Emerald Parkway and I-270, to the south of Shamrock Court. Fadsting Zoning: LI, Limited Industrial District and RI, Restricted Industrial District. Request: Rezoning to the PC-fl, Planned-Commerce District. Tfiis includes review and approval of the composite plan and de~relopmel:t tsxt under the provisions of Section 153.058 for office development. Proposed Use: Continuation of the developing office .:ampus. Applicant: Shamrock II, c/o Victor D. Irelan, PO Box 370, Dublin, Ohio 4301?; and Dube Realty Limited Partnership, c% Mark Gialucca, 4700 Lakehurst Court, Suite 150, Dublin, Jhio 43016. MOTION: To approve this application with 13 conditions: 1) That the development text be revised W assure that imaginative building and site design be used to create a distinctive office environment per the City Council's direction; 2) That the building and parking setbacks 5e varied along I-270 with a minimum setback of SU feet; 3) That the existing tree rows are ptr-served and integrated (including the Cosgray Ditch as far as practicable) with the overall building, parking and landscape design including a minimum of grading and the relocation of utilities, if necessary; 4) That fencing be placed around all trees designated for preservation and during all phases of construction; 5) That the landscaping alonb Emerald Parkway'oe consistent with the City's Emerald Parkway Landscape Plan; 6) That the landscape treatment along I-270 be consistent with the I-2701andscape plan submitted with Tuttle Crossing North Section 2, Subarea A; Page 1 of 2 os-o20z Rezoning/Prcliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COM.'VIISSION RECORD Ok~' ACTION January S, 1998 1. Rezoning Application 97-1322 -Composite Pian - At Ewerakd Parkway, Phase 4 (Continued) 7) That adequate right-of--way be dedicated for the terminus of Shamrock Court and be designed to minimum turn-around specifications by the applicant prior to building construction; 8) That the future development plan allow for a pedestrian link to service a transit stop; 9) That a drainage study be completed addressing the relocation of Cosgray Ditch and meeting the City's stormwater guidelines and management plan; 10) That the text be amended to treat structures parking or a parking garage as a conditional use; 11) That the text be amended to limit the height of the building, within 600 feet of I- 270, to a maximum of eight stories and 110 feet including parapet, and the remaining area on t;~e site be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet, including p~Pe1; 12~ That the applicant and staff meet with the fire and safety officials to determine if there is a need. for emergency access to Shamrock Court; and _ 13) That the text be amended to include all of the commitments made by the applicant at the January 8, 1998 meeting. VOTE: 6-0 RESULT: This rezoning application will be forwarded to Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION .~ ~~ IGm C. Littleton Planner OS-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zonir "ommission Minutes -January 8, 1998 Page 2 Mr. I.ecklider mad motion to accept the docu nts into the record, and M ring seconded. The vote was as llows: Mr. Lecklider, yes• ir. Peplow, yes; Ms. 130 ' g, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; and Mr. Sprague, yes. ( proved 5-0.) ~ 1. Rezoning Application 97-1322 -Composite Plan - At Emerald Parkway, Phase Q Kim Littleton said this is a rezoning from Lt, Limited and RI, Restricted Industrial Districts to the PCD, Planned Commerce District fer an office development. The site is 16.1 aces between I-270 and a future extension of Emerald Parkway. He said the applicant and staff have worked hard to resolve issues in the last month. Mr. Littleton said the PCD requires most of the plan deasions to be made at the rezoning, not at a fu.,~re stage of review. The development standards, density, infra.~trvcture contributions, etc. an; noted in a development tent and composite plan. The Commission will have limitea discretion at the development plan stage. Mr. IiWeton showed slides of the arra and t~f a schematic site plan or capacity study for the site. The Cosgray Ditch is tree-lined and runs through the site, and the applicant proposes to relocate the stream to the north edge of the site. The staff requests preservation of the existing trees as well as anatural-looking, planted relocated stream bed. The tree rows on the north and south property lines are to be preserved. The site is north of the LCI building within the Thomas/Kahler site. Shamrock Court currently scabs as an unfinished street into the site's northeast corner. Dublin's proposed roadway plan has been re-examined for this development. Shamrock Court was to be extended southward and westward, terminating at the intersection of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway. A through street has been determinai not io be needed. Mr. Littleton said the former text requested up to 25,000 square feet of office building development per oc:e. This has been amended to 17,500 square feet per acre to match the Community Plan. A 130-fc+ot building height is requested across the ent;re site. Thomas/Kohler permits this within t50G feet of I-270 ard then steps down to 80 feet. The proposed I-270 setback is 75 feet for building and 50 fezt for parking. Staff, in line with guidance from City Council, supports a broader setback along I-270. This would enhance the freeway view. Mr. Littleton said a continuation of the Thomas/Kohler architecture a~td style is proposed. City Council expressed a concern at the first reading of this rewning about quality azchitecture and the desire for a more innovative design. He said a traffic study was prepared. ~1Vcerner••Temple :toad will be extended within the next yeaz. Originally, it was to be trigger~l by a stcond large building on fire Thomas/Kohler site. The study recommends a signal at Rings Road and Emerald Parltway. 'That intersection is expected to be temporary and was not intende~' to be signalized. As this ama develops, transit will play a lazger role. These high density offices need sidewalks and a transit stop. He said the staff recommends approval with 10 conditions: 1) That the development tent be revised to assure ~itat imaginative building and site design to used to create a distinctive office em~ironment per the City Council's direction; 2) That the building and parkin, setbacks be increased to at bast 75 feet along I-270; 08-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning andLoni• ':ommission Minutes -January 8, 1998 Page 3 3} That the existing tree rows are prey; -ved and integrated with the overall building, pazking and landscape design including a minimum of grading and the relocation of utilities, if necessary; 4) That fencing be placed around all trees designated for preservation and during all phases of construction; 5) That the landscaping along Emerald Parkway be consistent with the Emerald Parkway I.an~+scapr Plan; 6} That the landscape treatment along i-270 be consistent with the I-270 landscape p12n submitted with Tuttle Crossing North Section 2, Subarea A; 'n 'That adequate right-of--way be dedicated and that the te,~ninus of Shamrock Court be designed and installed to minimum turn-around specifications prior to building eonstru~tion; 8) That the future development plan include full access to Shamrock Court; 9) That the future development plan allow for a transit stop at this location; and 10) That a dra;;~age study be completed address~ind the relocation of Cosgray Ditch and meeting the City's stormwater guidelines and management plan. Mr. Littleton said there has been hard work, but several conditions aze still unresolved with the applicant. He said the I-270 setback increase is consistent with design guidance from Council, but the applicant feels it Hill limit flexibility. The completion of the end of Shamrock ~~urt and access to it is also not aooeptable to the ap~.:::...nnt. The applicant agrees or:Iy to dedicate the right- of--way for the turnaround. Completion of the stnxi and asxess are not aectpta~~le to the :yplicant. Staff believes tra.Ffic distribution is required by such a large project. Bosh :~ublin azld the applicant should work on hroactening local transit options: 1-:e said .transit s:ol, should be identified within the right-of-way, and the sir• layout should accommodate it, have sidewalks, etc. Mr. Littleton: said structured parking is a possih=iity for this site. Mr. Lecklider asked if stuctured perking is inclsded in the 1.7, ~JO density calculation. Mr. Littleton said no. An eight or nine story office with smulti-story parkin g g2rage is possible on this site, for exarr~ple, based on the LCI footprint. The total site can hold 2?~,~J00 squaze feet of office under tl;e terms of the develo*~ment text. The LCi b~~ilding is five stories and about 65 feet tall, set back 190 feet from Emerald Parkway. The Meim V building is nine stories and sightly over 100 feP.t tall. Mr. Littleton said buildings closer to .Emerald Pazk xay should not exceed 80 feet. Mr. Lecklider said thP appearance along Emerald Parkway is of equal impor•.ance to 'hat along I-270. Emerald Parkway is not separated from the site by a Nide freeway right-of--way, and tl'ie traffic will be moving stower. Mr. Littleton said the Wcerner-Temple completion to Avery Road will permit Rings Rord to be de-emphasized. It should also help move some trips off of Wilcox Road to Avery Road. 1•~.. Leckider wants t0 know if 'Koerner-Temple :v11 be signalized at Wilcox and Avery Roads. Mr. Little±on said the existing LCI building has apre--cast concrete facade. He said no on-site water feature is planned. Stcrm water detention has not yet been designed. 08-0207, Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Du~li~ Planning and Zonin~ '~mmission Minutes -January 8, 1995 Page 4 Mr. Lecklider asked if any of the ancillary uses, such as a daycare or resraurant, would be permitted outside of an office structure. Mr. Littleton said no. The text said the 70 percent lot coverage may be exceeded for a tall building subject ~o conditional use approval by the Commission. Ms. Boring believes thee„ is agreement that this site should be office. However, she wants clarify on the limitations of this PCD rezoning. Some issues will be discretionary and others will riot, and the developer is being vague beraus.- no user has been identified yet. Mr. Littleton said the text should spell out the rules fo* future development review. ?ds. Clarke cad the text sets the parameters for the development clan consideration. At the future development plan stage, the Commission's only job is to determine if a projec. meets the teat. The Commission does not have discretian~ry power at the development plan stair-. unless the development text wntains language granting that authority to the Commission. She said if the developer and the Commission agree to defer certain issues un`''. the development plan, they neeo to be ^,ited in the text. If architecture is not mentioned in the text, the developer has complete discretion. lvfr. Littleton said the taxt permits buildings 130 feet in height anywhere on the site. Ms.~Boring thought burial of utilities should be addresse.~i in the text. Mr. Littleton Said the Tires coming out of the electrical substation may be difficult to bury and would be very costly. Mr. Littleton said Shamrock. Court has a temporary turnazound that actually uses a reinforced driveway on private property (Safety Solutions) for vehicul:s maneuvering. The street should have a completely finishc_J public turnaround, sins: it is not being extender; through the site as originally planned. 'The applicant does not want this site used for cut-through traffic He feels this can be candled by making through traKc inconvenient in the designing the oftce site plan. He said this is a large developm~xrt under consideradcxt; and the staff believes that the trips should be distributed. This is :: City policy for both commercial and residential development. Staff supports connecting the p*+oposed parking lot(s) to Shamrock Court and maximizing access points. Ms. Clarlae said 4'te original plans for the Imo-shaped extension ut Shamrock Court cut up this 3it~;. That was always recognized by LubL n and the property owner (who is not the appliean:). Everyone recognized that it would be a difficult and costly roadway link to build. This developer 'hcrught is was an unnecessary connection, and Dublin had a traffic study done to determine if the road extension is needed. The study concludes that a public road link is unnecessary. Mr. Littleton said the signs wiL' be the same as the Thornas/Kohler text. Ground signs will be monument type cn masonry base having a maximum height of six fxt. Ms. Clarke said this text is more r:strictive than the general Sign Cody. 2ris. Chinnici-ZaserLher astral ~` L:~erald Parkway has a particular landscape plan. Ms. Clarke :csponded that only ;'le sec• ~ ~~~ ~rween Coffman and Lublin Roads is designed and *eady for 08-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin P}arming and Z~nir ':ommission Minutes - 3anaary 8, 1998 Page 5 installa~on. There is an overall unifying design for Emerald Parkway, and tt•-e City is now having the other sections designed to conform with the overall concept. Mr. Ferr~.ra emphasized that this 'andscape design is important and should be executed egt!ally from one end to the other. Mr. Ferrara thought the tumarottnd needs to be designed to accommodate trucks and buses. M*. Littleton said the turnaround has not yet bxn designed. Ms. Clazke said typically it is a developer's responsibility to build the road in front of his site, including the street turnaround. In this case, there is expected to be a TIF involved, which is not as yet drafted. The staff believes that the read improvement should be installed with the site development, regardless of who pays for it. Staff s cc~tteem is not the funding, but the completion of the area infrastructure. Mr. Littleton said a pazking garage will need to meet the building setback, as opposed to the pazki,~g setback. A paz;cing structure would be used to compute lot coverage. Nir. Sprague asked if the density is subject to any discretion later in the process. Ms. Clazke said st:.ff recommends using specific density figures in the text. Ms. Chinnici-?uercher thought there should be a correlation between this text and that for Thomas/I:ohler. Mr. Littleton said there is an Tttempt io increas: the standards in response to statements made by City Council. Ms. Clarke said there is an attempt here to improve upon the Thomas/Koh~er text to create a greener appearance and io encourage imaginative architech~;e. Mr. Littleton said the text has been amended to discuss relationships between buildings and the freeway, but architecture has not bcen directly addressed. It is difficult to descrihe design by using a text alone without any graphics. The scale and aesthetic:s of a parking garage are quite different from an office structure. A 3arage is lower, broader and cpen. The materials and treatment may be an issue when pmsented for approval: It wo~:ld need to be thought through prior to site development, including connections and relationship to the office stn~cture. Ms. Clazkz said the text st:oti~ld incIade descriptors such as Class A o,,~`rces, signature bui~ings, and imaginative anchilecture. The text says the buildings ;~vill have the same degree of finish on all sides. She said the text is clear about the density, but it does not indicate that any creativity is needed in designing a building for this site. The Co;nmissior_ will have no discretion. l.ss. Chinnici-Zuerchcr wanted clear language in the text for architecture. The terms merrttioned are not defined and would be subject to interpretation. Mr. Littleton said the plan submitted is not really a site pla.,. It is a capacity study ar a depiction of rough are ~ for development without any dimensions. Mr. Lecklider was concerned about the possiule appearance of parking structures. The text references the limited use vi "nigh chrome" colors for accents. Mr. Littleton said thi: might be a band or accent stripe. Ms. Clarke said that is a typographical error. It should state "high chrome," meaning br^ht colors. An example is the teal stripe on the IDI building. 08-02QZ Rezonu-g/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning '~mmission Minutes -January 8, 1998 Page 6 Ric:: Helwig statcd there have been many meetings with the developer. This will be the trigger site for the Wcerner-Temple extension through a 7'IF a year sooner than thought possible. This corridor provides abundant resources to D~~blin. The hope is to provide a favorable situation fir expansion of an LCJ campus. It is a very exciting opportunity. The staff vision is for less than ten stories. This is seen us a 16-acre extension of Thomas/Kohler. The i7,S00 square foot density is a cornerstone. Parking garages will be decided later. The mazketplace is competitive for this aeveloper. He said the setback nearer to the neighborhood is the more important edge. The developer wit provide the right-of--way for Shamrock Court, ;nd he expects the City to build the hunaround. One-way egress is the essential movement. He was unaware of the reference to the transit stop. Mr. Helwig believes transit is a municipal responsibility. Ben Hale, attorney for the applicant, said Duke devet~pod the LCI building and owns other office property in the area Expansion to the south was considered, but an expansion to the north provides interesting options. The present industrial zoning does not provide for any Commission review whatsoever. Duke will do a quality development here. Mr. Hale said the Planned Commerce District was adopted fairly recently. It was to be used for sites that had not yet beer- designed. Not all the questions can be answered up front. He prefers to submit definitive plans, but cone are available yet. At the development pl::n stage, b~. said the Ccm,-nission will have some discmetion urdcr the text on architecture. [See text, page 9.] It will be swell-designed, coordinated office campus. M.r. Hale said the text langu:~ge *epe:+ts the Thomas/Kohler standards regarding the ditch regrading, reforestation, appearance, etc. Some of the trees will be removed from the existing stream., but they will make the effort tc przserve trees. He agrees to Co~ditior~s 3, 4, S, b and 10. They agree to dedicate the r c wed right-of--way at Shamrock Court. They do not want trucks using their parking lots for a:czss, but they will have an exit. He bzlieves he has already complied with Condition 1, regarding architectural design. He believes that a SO-foot setback along I-270 is appropriate. ?f a transit stop is developed in the right-of--way, they will provide a sidewa;k if requested. Mr. Ferrara asked if there will be a wet pond. Mr. Hale said he did not stow, but it should be attracti•~eiy treated. Mr. Ferrara said it Tooke tou small to be an attractive pond. Mr. Ferrara said two right angles are shown in the relocated ditch. These do not work well. Mr. Hale said right angles will not be used, and it will look like a meandering stream upon completion. Don Taunter said Duke will abide by the text which requires a meandering appearance, and there will not be ar.y right angles. Because of the ODOT culvert, right angles would be impossible. Mr. Ferrara said stone features were introduced to the south along I-270: These are not large enough to make a good impression and he suggested more emphasis en scone work. 08-0202 Rezoning/Prelirrunary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoni ~ ommission Minutes - Januar)~ ~, 1998 Page 7 Mr. Hunter said adding a pond at the Rings Road building wilt cost over $250,000, including the stone and landscaping. Given the speed of the traffic on the freeway, la:.~!scaping the I-270 buildings would cost over $1M. He is proud of the Duke buildings along I-270. He prefers to spend his landscaping budget where it .vill make the greatest impact. His company is local. He said Duke has always honored every commitment made, and will continue to do so. He wants to provide the maximum benefit, but he will not be 2~ble to phase everyone on every issue. Mr. Hunter said there should be trust that Duke will provide the visual amenities at the development clan stage. Mr. Ferrara said the property to the south has a stone treatment, and it should be conti~~ued on this sits. Mr. Ranter made the commitment to add stone to the I-270 landscape treatment on this site, and that this development will look like Thomas/Kohler. Mr. Ferrara thanked him. Mr. Peplow asked if there were examples of other pazking garages for comparison purposes. Mr. Hale said the expected tenant has very unusual parking needs, and that will influence the construction of a parking garage. He said Duke will agree to use the same building materials on the garage structure as the office building. This could be madam part of any conditional use. The garage, if any, will be designers with the building. Mr. Peplow noted that on'}' the density will be a conditional use under the proposed text, not the garage itself. Mr. Hale said they will go together. Mr. Sprague apprtxiated the text revision to lower the density in l?:,e with the Community Plan, but he was concernai about traffic and the impact on local residents. Doyle Clear, Barton Aschman Associates, said this area was aralyzed in the Community Plan as office use at 17,500 squaze feet per acre. There aze more ~:~iployees per thousand square ftr:.t, but the vehicle trip rate is not affected. 1'he roadw~ry system is being designed to handle this. He said there will be some intermittent problems until the network is completed. The Woerner- Temple Extension will help to protect Rings Road. Mr. Sprague was concerned about the aesthetics of the relocated Cosgray Ditch. Mr. Hale said to the extent that the trees can be saved, they will be. They cannot be replaced with liko-sized trees. Mr. Hale said zeplacing the tree row provides a pleasing backdrop W the proposed offices. The industrial development to the north is not of the same visual quality, and a buffer is needed. Ms. Boring was concerned about Condition 9 regarding a transit stop. The Community Plan stresses the need to use other types of transit, not relying solely on cars and parking lots. She said this is Dublin's first opportunity since its adoption to properly integrate `ransit. rdr. Hate said they will build walkways or links, but bus traffic needs specially reinforced concrete pavement within the public street. Bases arse very hazd on Forking surfacrs. Ms. Boring wanted any transit opportunities to be encouraged, and was surprised by Mr. Hale's hesitation. Developer cooperation will be needed to make transit work, and transit should nct be thwarted. U8-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zor Commission Minutes -January R, 199Zs Page b Dos. Clarke said staff would suppor~ amending Condition 9 in line with Mr. Hale's ;,uggestions. She said transit should be considered in the site design, but staff did not think an on-site transit stop was likely to ~~ppert. A fl~tur~e bus route using Emerald Parkway is more likely, and placing the building closer W the street, for example, with connecting sidewalks would make the site more friendly to pote~~tiai bus riders. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said many workers in large buildings must park quite tar from the building. The amount of walking is increasing for all. She asked staff to reword Condition 9. Ms. Boring said we should all be working toward making mass transit attractive io people. It should be encouraged, and we should try io make it easier for people to use t.'~e bus than to drive. As a community we have done nothing to make it attractive; it reeds more than lip service. She wanted this to be as open as possible to accommodate future transit opportunities. Mr. Hale said their site plan will be designed to service a transit stop in the nght-of--way. Mr. Ferrara wanted assurance of cooperation with future transit. Mr. Ha:;; agreed. Ms. Boring was interested in Condition 7 regarding Shamrock Court. The roadway plan is being changed W eliminate a portion of Shamrock Court, but the developer should do more than dedicate the right-of-way. Mr. Littleton said the design of the turnaround and how this parking lot connects to it are important as well. Ms. Clarke said the staff concern is that the infrastructure on the site be complete at the outset of construction. The road construction may be funded by the TIF, but the 'ITF has not yet beer. drafted. If not TIF-funded, the developer should complete it. Doyle Clear stated that, based on traffic volumes, this parking Iot does not need to tie into Shamrock Court. A connection will neosssiate construction of a culvert over the ditch. He thinks it will be used mainly by Columbus State students cutting through the site. Ms. Boring was concerned about the safety of Shamrock Court as a very long cal de sac. Mr. Clear responded that fire e.nergency access, whiclt is different from standard access, can be provided there. Mr. Lecklider said he did not want the cal de sac to cause sharp angles ire the "meandering" steam. Mark Giatucca, representing Duke, responded that the cal de sac will not cause this. However, he said the worst option from an aesthetic standpoint would be a driveway connection. Concerning page 9 of the text, Mr. Lecklider wanted an understanding of the Commission's discretion on the issue of architecture at the next stage. Mr. Hale said the Commission has historically exercised wide discretion. Tt;ere is a commitment to a quality and coordinated eatripus. If the City wants to dictate materials, it should grant a tax abatement. 08-0202 Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zone ~ommi~sion Minutes -January S, 1998 Page 9 Mr. Hunter said he thought there was an agraor.'ient with the staff on the language in the text. He was surp. used that there is still a problem. Architecture is subjective, and he does not know how to word the text to address the issue. He has agreed to all staff's requests. Mr. Lecklider said his concerns were based upon ehe text itself, not the staff report Mr. Hunter said he believes the City and his company will continue to work as a team, and there needs to be trust on both sides. Dublin is his customer, and Duke takes pride in its buildings. Mr. Hale said at the development plan stave, there will be a building design and a client to use the building. Tf the Commission disapproves the building, the client can appeal *.o Council or thc court. He believes the text gives the Commission the :fight to negotiate on the is.~ ~e because he has no azchitec;tural design to present at this stage. Mitch Banchefsky asked if the applicant is willing to submit to the "reasonable discretion" of the Commission at the time of the development plan. Mr. Hale and Mr. Hunter said yes. There was discussion about a parking barage and added density being txeated as conditional uses. Several Commissioners wanted clear language in the text. Mr. Hale agreed that any pazking garage would be a conditional use, and that the same materials will be used for them as for the office buildings. Amy Salay, representing the Heather Glen Civic Association, said the residents appreciate the work of the Commission and staff. From the neighborhood, the five-story LCI building is very dominant. The residents oppose the 130-foot height being requested. Mr. Hunter said "structured" pazking is underneath the building. He thinks a freestanding parking garage is more likely, but he wants the flexibility to build either. Ms. Boring said City Council was somewhat dissatisfied with the setbacks along I-270, and a greenbelt is eery important. She asked for an increase in the setback above 50 feet. Mr. Hale said parking usually wraps azound the building. Mr. Hunter said there is a need to balance the walldng distances. There was discussion but no agreement on increasing the setback. Mr. Lecklider did not want any use of high chroma colors, even as accents. He was also concerned about the proposed building height. This site is not the same as Thomas/Kohler. It is too close to a neighborhood for eight or. nine story buildings. LCI is about 65 feet tall. He could support a compromise height of 80 feet. Ms. Boring agreed. Ms. Boring said economic development is important, but it needs to be balanced with needs of the neighbe~nood. To the west of I-270, the neighborhoods are closer and height is problematic. She wants a text reference added regarding fire access. She wanted a green belt along I-270. 08-0202 Rezoning/preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Ptanr,:ng and Zoi Commission Minutes -January 8, 1998 Page 10 Mr. Sprague said everyone involved has improved this proposal over the original submission and many of his concerns have been addressed. He remains uncomfortable with the proposed height. Mr. Peplow is also concerned about the height. He also wants fire and emergency access, but that requires the construction of a culvert, etc. He thought perhaps it should be a full access. A high volume of cut-through traffic would suggest that better through access is needed. Ms. Boring thought it should be left to the discretion of the Fire Department. Mr. Peplow prefers the appearance of buildings that are set back from I-270. An innovative technique might oe able to create the same appearance. He supports a 75-foot setback. Mr. Ferrara believes that Shamrock Court should be closed, but it should be reviewed by safety departments. The proposed height of 130 feet concerns him greatly, but he understands the economic impact to the community at large. He notod that most of the remaining undeveloped freeway frontage is to the east of the river. He is concerned a'~out establishing a precedent, but each site needs to be judged individually. Ms. Chinnici-Zuencher said the most attractive buildings along the freeway have Qeeper setbacks. It seems that the height was previously agreed to by the staff. Height was not addressed as a condition in the staff report. Mr. Hale said the ccferrrta to high chrome colors on page 9 of the text will be deleted. He said the minimum setback along the freeway should be 50 feet, but he agreed that it would be varied in some places. Mr. Hale said they agree to limit buildings to a maximum of eight stories within 600 feat of the freeway, or 110 feet in height including the parapet. Between that point and Emerald Parkway, buildings will ntt exoced six stories, ur S~0 feet in height including the parapet. [Tlte development text will be amended to include these amendments.) Mr. Hunter said his company held an open house for the community to comment, and no one attended from the neighborhoods. There was discussion on the wording for several conditions. Mr. Ferrara made a motion to approve this r,~zoning application with the fallowing 13 conditions: . 1) That the development text be revised to assure that imaginative building and site design be used to orate a distinctive office environment per the City Council's direction; 2) That the building and parking setbacks be varied along I-270 with a minimum setback of 50 feet; 3) That the existing tree rows are preserved and integrated (including the Gosgray Ditch as far as practicable) with the overall building, parking and landscape design including a minimum of grading and the relocation of utilities, if necessary; U8-0207, Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zon Commission Minutes -January 8, 1998 Page 11 4) That fencing be placed around all trees designated for preservation and during all phases of construction; 5) That the landscaping along Emerald Parkway be consistent with the City's Emerald Parkway Landscape Plan; 6) That the landscape treatment along I-270 be consistent wiih the I-270 landscape plan submitted with Tuttle Crossing North Section 2, Subarea A; 7) That adequate right-of-way be dedicsited for the terminus of Shamrock Court and be designed to minimum turnamund specifications by the applicant prior to building construction; 8) That the future development plan allow for a pedestrian link to service a transit stop; 9) 'That a drainage study be completed addressing the relocation of Cosgray Ditch and melting the City's stormwater guidelines and management plan; 10) That the text be amended w treai structured parking or a parking garage as a conditional use; 11) That the text be amended to limit the height the building, within 6C0 felt of I-270, to a maximum of eight stories and 110 feet including parapet, and the remaining area on the site be limited to a maximum of six stories and 90 feet including parapet; 12) That the applicant and staff mcet with the fire and safety officials to determine if there is a need for emergency access to Shamrock Court; and 13) That the text be amended to include all of the commitments made by the applicant at the January 8, 1998 meeting. Mr. Sprague seconded the motion. Mr. Hale accepted the conditions. The vote was as folloK•s: Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. 1.ecl:lider, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Approved tr0.) 2. acres to an unust T ' request is for lic~nt has been it entry lute. A redu Village deed yes c~ for 1'h the %nt~P'[an 97-151RFDP ~~sed final develop n~ y~ifield Drive. 'site v zero lot line ncept..C a more tional single star s for t~projec Village Phase J~Y- Kentigern plar~v thic~involy 3single-family lots to 1 A square fcet story mes, and 1,000 y e text requires a ::ii ' :um living azea that have been reco guyed and conform staff feels this is appropriate. They nginally pla in 1988 for 44 clus four hou ere built. The pl was lily d tgn. t had a develop t text d ittlet n said 13 hem have been rovid more w le stand~ards~ The :urb cut is g requested for ~he ho comparable to the u' teld or o -sto .domes, 1,200 a feet split els need 1,8 care feet. 2 square feet. n the size of ith-The overalls ds of Muirfield pis should be s plainly in the text. OH-0202 Rezoning/1'reliminary Development Plan Tuttle North PCD - IGS 1;rnerald Parkway