Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 45-11
RECORD OF ORDINANCES I Ordinance No. 45 -11 Passed 1 20— AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 20.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RINGS ROAD AT THE INTERSECTION WITH ATRIUM PARKWAY FROM PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT (CHAKERES WHEATLEY PUCKETT) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (ATRIUM II PUD) (CASE 11- 034Z /PDP/FDP) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, r of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, Parcel No. 273 - 008241 (see attached map marked "Exhibit A "), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2 . Application, Exhibit `B ", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C," are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of /.cam ( 2011. Mayor - P & ding Officer ATTEST: C" Clerk of Council CITY OF DUBLIN_ Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 Phone: 614-410-4400 •Fax: 614 -410 -4490 To: Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager Date: July 28, 2011 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 45 -11 — Rezoning approximately 20.1 acres located on the south side of Rings Road at the intersection with Atrium Parkway from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres Wheatley Puckett), to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Atrium II PUD) (Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP) Summary Ordinance 45 -11 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan for 20.1 acres to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to modify the development text regarding sign requirements for the Atrium II office complex. Background City Council approved Ordinance 40 -97 on June 2, 1997, rezoning 29.35 acres for the Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PCD to permit 310,000 square feet of office use. The rezoning was to incorporate additional acreage within a PCD rezoning ordinance (Ordinance 33 -97) of 17.23 acres for office use, approved April 14, 1997. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a development plan and a revised development plan for the construction of the Atrium II office complex on January 2, 1997 and May 1, 1997. A ground sign was approved in the center island of the northern entrance drive from Atrium Parkway, but not constructed. There are no signs on the site. Description The site has two, five -story buildings totaling 310,000 square feet connected by a glass atrium, which are addressed separately and operate independently. Parking areas are located at the front and rear of the building. Access is from Rings Road and two driveways on Atrium Parkway. Development Text Existing Sign Provisions The Atrium II approved development text identified the unique sign needs for the site, given the building entrance and vantage points from public streets, and permitted the following signs: Memo re. Ordinance 45 -11 Rezoning — Atrium II PUD July 28, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Approved Sign Provisions per Development Test Rings Atrium Entrance Drive I -270 Frontage Address North South Type I -270 Frontage Ground North South Wall Road Parkway 1 Numbers Type Ground 2 Ground Area (sq. ft.) Ground/Wall 80 Number 1 2 2 Area (sq. ft.) 50 50 each 300 each (Per Code) 6 Per Code None Location None Intersection with Ring Rd. Per Code Height (ft) 6 6 Per Code Either side of Location Entrance entrance Along I -270 frontage Drive drive Proposed Sign Provisions The proposed development teat modifies the sign provisions for Atrium II to allow a reconfiguration of the previously approved ground signs, provide two wall signs along the I -270 frontage, and increase the letter height for building address numbers. The proposed signs are summarized in the following table. Proposed Sign Provisions per Revised Development Text Rings Road Atrium Parkway Entrance Drive I -270 Frontage Address Numbers North South Type Ground Ground Ground Ground Wall Wall Number 1 1 1 1 2 4 Area (sq. ft.) 50 80 50 80 300 each (Per Code ) 30 -inch Letters Height (ft) 6 6 6 6 Per Code 30 Location Entrance Drive Intersection with Ring Rd. Interior island Entrance Drive West Elevation East and West Elevations Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the rezoning with preliminary development plan at the June 23, 2011 meeting and recommended approval to City Council. Conditions of approval made by the Commission have been incorporated into the development text and the proposed plans. The Commission simultaneously approved a final development plan, which will not be in effect until the rezoning Ordinance is passed. Recommendation Staff recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 45 -11 at the second reading/public hearing on August 22, 2011. M' co Health 01C IGS OLR 9 shl� q o„ Nationwide Insurance PCD sO Qwest Communications Fire Dept. PCD 11 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP N City of Dublin Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan q Land Use and /Final Development Plan N Long Range Planning Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan Feet 5455 & 5475 Rings Road 0 200 400 CITY OF DUBLIN., Land era and Lap Rang* Planning 5870 Slrieratiggs Rood Dublin. Oiio 43716 -1236 Phonc /TDD :614 - 410- &607 Fox. 614 -A10 -4747 Weh Si'c: w .tkrbV.r)h 1is February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) Final Development Plan ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.053(E)) (Section 153.115) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan ❑ Minor Subdivision (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment (Section 153.018) ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Other (Please Specify):_ (Section 152.015) Please utilize the applicable Sopplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): Parcel Size(s) (Acres): 273 - 008241 1 20.162 acres Existing Land Use /Development: PCD — Office Buildings IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use /Development: PCD - Office Buildings Total acres affected by application: 20 acres III. CURRENT PROPERTY Name (Individual or Organization): Duke Realty OHIO 5600 Blazer Parkway, Suite 100 (S tree t, Address: City, State, Zip Code) Dublin, Ohio 43017 (stre Daytime Telephone: 614- 932 -6108 Fax: Email or Alternate Contact Information: Jennifer C. Baiamonte Page 1 of 3 MAY 2 4 2011 R LE C CI TY DUB E��I13 USE O; .NG RANGE PLinNNING : Please attach additio sheets if needed. PIF�J � IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Applicant is also property owner: yes ❑ no E] Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: Fax: Email or Alternate Contact Information: V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: This is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in part 111. Please complete if applicable. Name: Ben W. Hale Jr. Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.) Smith & Hale LLC Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) 37 W . BRoad St. , Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215 Daytime Telephone: 221 -4255 Fax: 221 -4409 Email or Alternate Contact Information: Jack Reynolds VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. 1 ^ James Clark, S eni or V ice Pr esiden t , Colu O pe r ations the owner, hereby authorize Ben W. Hale Jr. / Jack Reynolds to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner� I Date: ❑ Check this box if the Authoriza6 for Ow ner's Applicant or Renresentativelsl is attaehpd as a senarafa rim —mont Subscribed and sworn before me this day of �1'�- li l 20 State of County of _ t -, Notary PuhYiE tL•<- � VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by City repre n application. The Owner /Applicant, as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, property described in this application._ Lauren H. la" laltmall)Aswolft mrofflft l ti n 10-IM14 I James Clark Senior Vice Preside Co lumbus Operat4 e caner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and ost a notice on the property described in this application. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: irJa " 1 Page 2 of 3 MAY 2 4 2011 ILE C 6.r: "e I✓S- DUBLIN F OPY LAND USE LO RANGE PLANNING VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The owner/Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and /or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said OwnerlApplicant. I James C lar k , Se ni o r _Vic P resid e nt, Columbus Operationge owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will he able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner/Applicant. �:- 7 Signature of applicant or authorized representative: Date /23L � IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This s4etiorr must be cttmigatthd and notarized. I _ _ Ben W. Hale Jr. read and understand the contents Af t is application- The information submitted is complete and in all respects true anp Signature of applicant or authorized representative: Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of State of �{ y County of � Notary Public 'Jafe:i4 I� l If" C. TOT" " {fft sw of ow "2D% FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 114 Am t a d: �- 00 .� A tic on `�. r (�P �� P&Z D Date(s) P &Z Action: 7c_- -awtm Rec t.Alo Map Zona: Date Received: C f' ( Received 13y: {� � City Council (First Reading): pt I I 1 City Council (Second Reading): Qc City Council Action: ordinance Number: q v — I I Type of Request: lM i N, (S�— W (Circle) Side of: N. Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: k� t' -`'v� I ` � V Distance from Nearest Intersection: Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: ? 1 1 Page 3of3 i1�V3L4 FYI+ — MAY 242011 F ILE COP c;I LAN USE&N WNG RANGE PLANNING ' the owner or authorized representative, have mation contained in this application, attached exhibits and other pct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. (AAvt f SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Carey BP Dublin LLC 394 E. Town Street Columbus, OH 43215 273 - 007673 duke- dublin. annex.lbl(ssg) 5/23/11 Ashland Inc. P.Q. Box 14000 Lexington, KY 40512 273- 010945 DP Parkcenter Circle LLC 600 E. 69 Street, Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46240 273 - 005398 ECEfVED � 011 PAP I FeJP MAY 2 4 FIL CITY OF DUCLIN E C 1AN0 USE & �r NC FtANG1 =1 Jkr1NING DESCRIPTION OF A 26,612 ACRE TRACT LOCATED WEST OF PAUL BLAZER PARKWAY AND SOUTH OF RINGS ROAD CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN STATE OF OHIO S ituated in the S Late of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, and being in Virginia Military Survey Number 4852, and being all of a 18 A29 acre trail of land and all of a 6.633 acre tract of land as conveyed to Duke Realty Baited Partnership by dad in Instrument Number 199807240185421 and also being all of it 1330 acre tract of land a conveyed to Dube Realty Limited Partnership by deed in Instrument Number 199709190097280, all moords can be found in the Res m&rs Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and being a 26.612 acne tract of land more particularly bounded and described as follows; Beginning at an iron pin get at Lie southeast comer of the said 1.350 acre tract and in the westerly right -0f - -way line of Paul Blazer Parkway, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract of land; Thence along the south line of said 1.350 acre tract, passing an iron pipe found at the northnat corner of Reserve "A" of subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 71 Pages 100, 101, and 102 and also being the northeast comer of it 4.089 aao tract of land as conveyed to Franklin Psoperds Banding Corporation by deed in Official Record 31651 PO4 at a distance of 1.33 feet, South 92• 21' 54" West, a total distance of 380.93 feet to an iron pin sat at the southwest comer of the said 6.833 acre tract and is the north line of a 18.150 acre tract of had as conveyed to Duke Realty Limited Partnership by deed in Instrument Number 199807240195421; Thence with the westerly line of the said 6.933 sae tract and the northerly line of the said 18.150 acre tract, North 07 °49'39" West, a distance of 23.99 feet to a pk nail found at the southeast corner of the said 18.429 acre tract; Thence with the southerly line of the said 19.429 ace tract and the northerly line of the said 18.150 acre tract along the following five (5) ooursea: 1) South 82 °21'54" West, a distance of 130.79 fat to an, iron pin farad; 2) North 52 °38'06" Wcst, a distance of 26.67 feel to an iron pin found; 3) South 82 °2 ['54" West, a distance of 119.65 feet to an iron pin found; 4) South 37 1 21'54^ West, a distance of 8.7.8 feet to an lean pm found; 5) South 07 East, a distance of 37.03 feet to an iron pin found in the north line of said Reserve "A "; Tbeaee along the southerly line of the said 18.429 acre tract, the uortwy line of the said 18.150 acre tract Laid the north lino of said Reserve "A ", South 92 '21'54" West, a distance of 65.91 feet to a atone found; Thence continuing with the previously described parval litre=, passing iron pins found at 29.73 -- feet, 179.60 feet, and 191.33 feet, South 82 West, a distance of 99SAI feet to an iron pipe fmad at the southwest comer of the said 18.429 ant: tract, the northwest comer of the said Atrtsm D' Phase 1 18.150 ace tract and in the easterly limited access right -cf agay line of Interstate 270; 545. Rings Road, Dublin, (H 43017 Pared No. 273-009759 -80; 273-009759 -90 Thence along the westerly line of tie said 18.429 acre Leta tad the along the easterly limited access right -0f - -way line of Interstate 270, North 12.46'38" Wry a dkmoe of 576.43 feet to an ism pipe found at the northwest gorner of the said 18.429 acre tract and in the soutbedy tight -f• Q way line of Rings Road as esablisW by the My of Dublin in Official Record 34807 H14 & I 5475 R i II,Prase 5475 ngs Road, Dublin, OH 43017 HIS; Para:l No. 273-009759.80; 27340759-90 Thence along the aid southerly right -d-way lino of Rings Rw d tmd tot+ aortherly line of the said Prig- Iartntment Reference: 18.429 acre Ina, North 75 Bast, a distance of 747.77 feet to as Iron pia ant; I u myt No. 20ofoatW73116 R EC 11 034 ? -/ b P / FOP MAY 242011 F @9 ILE GI's Y C)r t7�!Buhl COPY L "'IND Usj-- C. LONG RANGE PLANNING Thence continuing along the previously described parcel lines, Notch 79 °52'00" Fast, a distance of 210.05 feet to an iron pin found, Thence continuing with the said southerly right of way line and the northerly line of the said 18.429 acre tract, North 67° 16' 36" East, a distance of 92.82 feet to an iron pin found; Thence continuing along the previously described parcel lines. North 79 48' 18" East, a total distance of 556.75 feet to an iron pin set, Thence along the southerly right -of -way lice of Rings Road and the northerly line of the said 6.833 acre tract, North 83° 41' 01" East, a distance of 186.10 feet to an iron pin set at the northeast corner of the said 6.933 acre tract and at the northwest cantor of it 6.00 acre tract of land as conveyed to the City of Dublin, by deed in Official Record 18639 H07 'thence along the eastcriy lust of the said 6,833 sere tract and along the westerly line of rho said 6.00 acre tract, South 06' 23' 30" East, a distance of 512.66 feet to an iron pipe found ra ale sauthcast comer of the said 6.833 acre trAeg. ac [hr northeast coma of the said 1.350 acre tract and in the west right -of -way line of pawl 131astr p&&way; Ttoeutc along the said westerly right -of -way line and the easterly line of rho said 1.350 acre tract, South 06 ° 23'30" Fast, a dsstwicc of 204,95 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 26.612 acres of ]and. more or less. Subject to all easements and rights -0R -ways of record Bearings herein are based on a bearing of South 82 21' 54" West for the northerly litre of Reserve "A" contiguous with the described parcel as shown upon the referenced plat of Tuttle Crossing. Iron pins sot are 30" long and 518" (OD) and bear a plastic cap stamped'UB ". This description was prepared by I1B, INC. based on information obtained from an actual field survey of the premises. A drawing of this description is attached hereto and made part thereof. AMtun 11 Phases I aria Ii (Palle 2) RECE-A"I"y FI COPY MAY 2 4 2011 C ,El" i p UAPIZ s,s LONG RANGE f'Li;'INfrlIPJG VipA rk t Vincent P. Hugttcs HS�r1°c6 Professional Sarvoyor No. 76M March 22. 2001 NAL AMtun 11 Phases I aria Ii (Palle 2) RECE-A"I"y FI COPY MAY 2 4 2011 C ,El" i p UAPIZ s,s LONG RANGE f'Li;'INfrlIPJG i � 1 w �a ��wOA1D YIiRIM w rMfHl Ce i WAOd L a o i nod IKMN= • we runaa E� 9 (D wrERSTATE 270 26.512 ACRE TRACT SOUTH OF RINGS ROAD EAST OF INTERSTATE ROUTE 270 WEST OF PAUL BLAZER PARKWAY CITY OF DUBLIN COUNTY OF FRANKLIN w oa�uio � ra Atrium II ftam I Rod 11 (Pap 3) 1i-06q � >bP 1FbP MAY 9.42011 FILE Copy CV FY Y OF DUE I ! LJJi4 tJS LONG f�ANGL PLANNING GRAPHC 5" 0 50 1w EXCEPTING THEREFROM: DESCRIPTION OF A 6A60 ACRE TRACT LOCATED SOUTH OF RINGS ROAD AND WEST OF PAUL BLAZER PARKWAY IN THE CRY OF DUBLIN, OHIO SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, AND IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, BEING IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NO 4852, SAID 6.450 ACRES BEING A PART OF 26.612 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO DUKE -WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NO. 2001041 100751 1 1, RECORDER'S OFFICE, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO, SAID 6.450 ACRES BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING FOR REFERENCE AT AN IRON PIN SET AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF A 4.089 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRANKLIN PROPERTIES FUNDING CORPOR4TION BY DEED OF RECORD IN OFFICIAL RECORD 31851 F04, SAID CORNER MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AESERVE A' OFTUTTLECROSSING, A SUBDIVISION OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 71, PAGES 100, 101, 102; THENCE WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RESERVE 'A7, NORTH 82.21'54' EAST A DISTANCE OF 1.33 FEET TO A IRON PIN FOUND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF PAUL BLAZER PARKWAY, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, PASSING, AT A DISTANCE OF 1.33 FEET, THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNERS OF SAID RESERVE 'A' AND SAID 4.089 ACRE TRACT, SOUTH 82 °21'54' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 380.93 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A 18.150 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY DEED OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NO. 199807240185421, SAID IRON PIN LIES SOUTH 82°21'54' WEST FROM AFOREMENTION 18.150 ACRE NORTHEAST CORNER, A DISTANCE OF 68.21 FEET; THENCE CROSSING THE SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT WITH TRACT WITH THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COURSES; 1. NORTH 07 °46'39' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 24.61 FEET TO A PK NAIL FOUND AT A POINT OF CURVATURE; 2. THENCE WITH AN ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 235.50 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 29 °11'05', WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 20 9 44'59' WEST WITH A CHORD DISTANCE OF 118.66 FEET TO A PK NAIL FOUND; S. THENCE NORTH 35'2071' WEST A DISTANCE OF 168.82 FEET TO A PK NAIL FOUND; 4. THENCE WITH AN ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 575.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 08°01'42', WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 31 °19'40' WEST WITH A CHORD DISTANCE OF 80.50 FEET TO A PK , NAIL SET; ' 5. THENCE NORTH 62 °41'11' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 64.75 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; 6. THENCE NORTH 69 1 13'51' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 9623 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; 7. THENCE NORTH 11 °44'05' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 210.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET; Atrium a P6saa I and II (Pate 4) E: ar: rip MAY 2 4 2D11 FIL C: -'- y OF DUBLIN E COPY LONG (tANCE PLANNING S. THENCE NORTH 06°23'32" WET, A DISTANCE OF 111.82 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET IN THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RINGS ROAD CONVEYED TO THE CITYOF DUBLIN BY INSTRUMENT N0.199709080088&%; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, AND ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RINGS ROAD, NORTH 79 °46'18" EAST A DISTANCE OF 118.48 FEET TO AN IRON PIN SET MARKING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RINGS ROAD CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN BY DEED IN INSTRUMENT NO. 199712300178671; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, AND THE SOLrrHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RINGS ROAD, NORTH 83 °41'01' EAST A DISTANCE OF 186.10 FEET TO A IRON PIN SET AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, AND IN A 6.00 ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CI7Y OF DUBLIN, BY DEED IN OFFICIAL RECORD 18639 H07; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID 26.612 ACRE TRACT, AND ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID 6.00 ACRE TRACT, SOUTH D6 °23'30' EAST A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 717.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 6.450 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT -OF -WAYS OF RECORD BEARINGS HEREIN ARE BASED ON A BEARING OF SOUTH 82'21'54' WEST FOR THE NORTHERLY LINE OF RESERVE A CONTIGUOUS WITH THE DESCRIBED PARCEL, AS SHOWN ON THE SAID PLAT OF TU7TLE CROSSING AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 71, PAGES 100,101 AND 102. IRON PINS SET IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE 518' - (O.D.) 30" LONG WITH A PLASTIC CAP STAMPED'LJB'. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY LJB, INC, BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY OF THE PREMISES. A DRAWING OF THIS DESCRIPTION IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE PART THEREOF. O F 0 VINCENT P, HUGH * P AUL kuGHES PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR NO. 7608 g 7 Q g�01ST� APRIL 17, 2001 , !ONA4 @•7 ` Atrium tl Pb�1 and Il (pap S) j gaScnPGo n Verb a pe RE.,pS. F�gnk4[n Cosinty r- F�.' - I�, j I mo. �1 -03y �-- / ?bP P MAY 242011 FILE COP Y y�' Y Of ' r-UFj c -r ,% Lx:�dL� US;: LONG RANGE 1- UNNING LOCKWOM. ,IONL A DEALS roc. � tea[VaeT +mLaMl ROM I NMArM 0 FAX UvY AM 6.450 ACRE TRACT OUT OF A 26.612 ACRE T RAC, AND BEING PART OF VIRGINIA MILITARY NO. 4852 CITY OF DUSUN COUNTY OF FRANKLIN INTERgATE 270 °R/Y ` k N 4 k 'DETAIL I . J P, F. -11 f R!W — 111 , PAUL ` R ] } NOT 0 5 ALE i MW2 ACRE5 V PARCEL N0. rst'w$9 t4� PAR-& AQ- 2734M60 PAACEL #a aJ -009NI �7 l r5f E . RA0. • Px& 50' DE LTA • 2711' 03' 6 q CHA • Al 274W -sew r.W L,/ cma 1x57'. • 119.66' +� RAA • 575L00' EE • 09'01 h x CHa 1 • xrS+Crw AV49•N8'Et cHa US7 - 8.7.50 r r D� DUKE -WEEKS REALTY MTV PARTNERSHIP �'J LA'5TR. AVID411OW5111 2&6)2 ACRES '• C1TY 17 Lk1 r�� G V ACRES O.R. IM39 hVr n FRANKLIN Pi7[A°ERTrfS fUULYh'G L1ARFg41�•kv O.R. 31651 For 4,W9 ACRES PART OF RESERVE 'A' 0 L? DUKE REALTY LaED PAR-Ji►fRSHIP WST2 IPA@07240185121 V ZRACr Of 18.150 ACRE5 I`l PARE OF RESERVE 'A' 8A.515 OF &EASVW SOUTH B@• I- KWEST. THE WXN VN'E OF ` RESERVE 'A• As SHLWN M"0 L�UWEA� ED LN TH£ 1 FWttrEYrCw SZia,"S�V AY.A* eNrrTLEG TUTTLE CRI7 VAc*OF AFew m PLAY BRxK Fl. PACES 10LL 101 AND 102 A5 SHOWN NI FRANKLIN! musTY RECTA XR'S OFFA:E. HFRF F T REPRESEA?S THE RESULTS OF AN ACTUAL Ft&D SURVEY OF THE PREIISES PERFoRmen UNWR Ar RESPONS76LE SUFERV15AW AND THAT THE SAID ORAiV1AC 1 IS CYA'rRECr TO THE BEST Of Yr KNCIATEDGE i ANO a'UEF. THE PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO ALL EA;E'UEXT& AV EEMENTS AK& RG" T 4F- WA"S OF REtDRA THEP.E WAS Aa T1TLE L 9UlLLcR PAONptO FpR THIS p4A1F7NO, THUS IT UAY NOT SMW 1,U EASEUENTS OF RECORa LEGEND E ON. !OT FRO O AIL FNO 0 LP. FND ' RR SET 0 LA SIT [ sravc FAD SEE W&W I nroao I b n ALB vTH MI9 4 L e1 GRMHr; SC14_E 0 -0100 Xv +cam SCALE. 7'•h7i 1' FILE COPY Actium 11 Phan 1 and D (Page 0 ECERFEM) MAY 14 2011 GIiY OF DUBL LONG RANGE PLANNING 64.15' 1 A+or f&.VW AW4r1 r f 2`,.61 l r5f E ! x zrt CLW ff � r.W L,/ 6-450 AMS TRAC h AV49•N8'Et q r r 1•s 'r F e YR. ll�. J5179r y . r _ . 4 caaara -..� D� DUKE -WEEKS REALTY MTV PARTNERSHIP �'J LA'5TR. AVID411OW5111 2&6)2 ACRES '• C1TY 17 Lk1 r�� G V ACRES O.R. IM39 hVr n FRANKLIN Pi7[A°ERTrfS fUULYh'G L1ARFg41�•kv O.R. 31651 For 4,W9 ACRES PART OF RESERVE 'A' 0 L? DUKE REALTY LaED PAR-Ji►fRSHIP WST2 IPA@07240185121 V ZRACr Of 18.150 ACRE5 I`l PARE OF RESERVE 'A' 8A.515 OF &EASVW SOUTH B@• I- KWEST. THE WXN VN'E OF ` RESERVE 'A• As SHLWN M"0 L�UWEA� ED LN TH£ 1 FWttrEYrCw SZia,"S�V AY.A* eNrrTLEG TUTTLE CRI7 VAc*OF AFew m PLAY BRxK Fl. PACES 10LL 101 AND 102 A5 SHOWN NI FRANKLIN! musTY RECTA XR'S OFFA:E. HFRF F T REPRESEA?S THE RESULTS OF AN ACTUAL Ft&D SURVEY OF THE PREIISES PERFoRmen UNWR Ar RESPONS76LE SUFERV15AW AND THAT THE SAID ORAiV1AC 1 IS CYA'rRECr TO THE BEST Of Yr KNCIATEDGE i ANO a'UEF. THE PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO ALL EA;E'UEXT& AV EEMENTS AK& RG" T 4F- WA"S OF REtDRA THEP.E WAS Aa T1TLE L 9UlLLcR PAONptO FpR THIS p4A1F7NO, THUS IT UAY NOT SMW 1,U EASEUENTS OF RECORa LEGEND E ON. !OT FRO O AIL FNO 0 LP. FND ' RR SET 0 LA SIT [ sravc FAD SEE W&W I nroao I b n ALB vTH MI9 4 L e1 GRMHr; SC14_E 0 -0100 Xv +cam SCALE. 7'•h7i 1' FILE COPY Actium 11 Phan 1 and D (Page 0 ECERFEM) MAY 14 2011 GIiY OF DUBL LONG RANGE PLANNING PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated ATRIUM II Preliminary and Final Plan Development Text 20.162 Acre Tract on the South Side of Rings Road Between I -270 and Paul Blazer Parkway A) SCHEMATIC PLAN, ETC. The site is an irregular rectangle totaling 29.355 acres. The I -270 frontage is about 600 feet; Paul Blazer Parkway frontage is about 700 feet and the depth along Rings Road is about 1500 feet. The site is essentially flat with a gentle slope to the east with an existing landscape business and single family house on the eastern portion of the site. The site is of a shape that will permit efficient development with an infinite number of variations. With the exception of the portion located within the elevated roadway for the Rings Road right -of -way there are no known physical factors that interfere with full use of the site. The primary attributes of the site are its I -270 freeway frontage and a location near to the Tuttle Crossing interchange. It can be anticipated that the ultimate user of this site will seek to exploit this exposure, probably with freeway - oriented office or corporate office uses such as are located to the north, south, and to the west, across I -270. Theses uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office, hotels /motels and major institutional uses. The site has significant frontage on Paul Blazer Parkway which would permit non - freeway oriented buildings. B) PROVISION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER, ETC. 1. Water service will be accessed from the 20 inch water line that is located in the Rings Road right -of -way, on the south side of the street. 2. Sanitary sewer service will be accessed from the 21 inch trunk line located along north side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. 3. Surface drainage is to be determined. The Cramer Ditch, a major drainage outlet, is located along the north side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. C) TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, ETC. The site has frontage on, and access to, Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway. Due to the elevation of the Rings Road bridge over I -270, cuts will be restricted on the western portion of the site. The "ramp" for the Rings Road /I -270 bridge is long and has excellent visibility. D) PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF SITE DEVELOPMENT, ETC. The first phase of construction of a 310,000 square foot office building is expected to begin in the spring of 1997. It is anticipated that is the freeway oriented portion of the site develops with a single user there will be a single phase of construction. If more than one user is involved it is anticipated that a single phase for each user will occur. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated E) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN SURROUNDING AREA, ETC. To the greatest degree possible, this teat seeks to make this site subject to the same goals, restrictions, and quality assurances as the Tuttle Crossing development to the south and across I- 270 to the west. The development standards of Tuttle Crossing Subarea A area largely carried over into this text. The goal is to encourage development of this site as a visually integral part of the Tuttle Crossing development and be complementary to the Ashland corporate park to the north. F) EVIDENCE OF CONTROL, ETC. All affected properties are now in the control of one developer. G) DEED RESTRICTIONS Deed restrictions, if any, will be filed at the time of conveyance of the property to end user(s). H) DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDSTEXT If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances then the Planned District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned District. The proposed development will complement the adjacent uses within the Tuttle Crossing Development. The Subarea Development Standards are as follows: Subareas The development plan for the subject property creates two subareas. Subarea A consists of 29.027 acres which contains the proposed 310,000 square foot office building along with ground for future development. Subarea B consists of .328 acres located on the southern portion of the site and will be used for landscaping and parking for the Atrium building as part of the revision to the driveway layout between the Atrium and BMW buildings. General 1. It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office park development. 2. Mid -rise, signature type offices with parking structures will be promoted along freeway frontage. 3. Building elevations, plans and materials will be submitted for approval as part of the Development Plan in order to ensure that the quality standards required by this text have been met. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated 4. The same palette of landscaping materials will be utilized in a similar design manner as in the Tuttle Crossing development to ensure a coordinated landscaping treatment. Proposed developments will be focused around major water features. Wells will be used in some cases to control levels. 5. All site planning will be done in a manner consistent with prudent planning principles and practices. Permitted Uses The following uses are permitted in Subarea A: 1. Those uses listed in Dublin Code 153.026 (SO, Suburban Office and Institutional) and 153.034 (OLR, Office, Laboratory and Research) 2. Corporate offices 3. Hotel and motel 4. Institutional uses 5. Ancillary commercial or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or hotel uses The following uses are permitted in Subarea B: 1. Parking 2. Landscaping Permitted Densitv The overall site will be developed with a maximum building area computed on the basis of acreage, exclusive of right -of -way with a maximum overall density of 17,000 square feet per acre. Yard and Setback Requirements 1. Setback along I -270 shall be 50 feet for all parking areas and 75 feet for buildings. 2. Side yards shall be 25 feet from pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for pavement. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated 3. Rear yards shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for pavement. 4. All other publicly dedicated streets shall have a 25 foot pavement setback and a 50 foot building setback. 5. Setback along Paul Blazer Parkway shall be 25 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25 percent of the total area Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 70 percent of the total lot area. Setback from the proposed north/south driveway shall be 15 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. HeiWht Requirements The maximum height for structure shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 100 feet. The maximum height may be extended if the structure is set back from both I -270 and Rings Road rights -of -way and an additional two feet beyond the required setback for every one foot of height above the 100 foot maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures. Parking and Loading 1. Sizes, ratio, and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code, Chapter 153. 2. Bank drive -thru uses subject to conditional use provisions of Dublin Code 153.026. 3. All loading docks shall be screened according to Dublin Code, Chapter 153. Circulation 1. All accesses shall be as approved by the City Engineer. At least one full service cut shall be permitted on both Paul Blazer Parkway and Rings Road, in an appropriate location. 2. Final location and design of all accesses to be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 3. A turn lane will be provided on Rings Road if it is needed, as determined by the City Engineer. 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated Waste and Refuse All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment 1. No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping 1. All landscaping shall be according to Dublin Landscape Code. 2. A continuous landscape treatment shall be provided along the I -270 frontage containing a six foot mound or evergreen hedge /planting. Trees shall be placed in a manner that provides a 50 percent visual opacity throughout the year. This shall be achieved by providing a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees. The deciduous trees shall be planted a minimum of 30 feet on center with a minimum installation size of 2.5 inches caliper measured at a height of 12 inches above ground level. Evergreen trees shall be installed a maximum of 15 feet on center with a minimum height of six to eight feet. Landscape material shall be located to provide maximum buffering to vehicular areas while allowing visual access to building facades. 3. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected during construction with snow fencing placed at the drip line and maintained during construction. 4. Within the 25 foot setback along Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway athree foot average height continuous earth mound shall be installed and planted with one tree per 40 feet of frontage or fraction thereof. Provided however that this requirement will be abated due to the rise in Rings Road as it crosses I -270. The degree and point of abatement will be subject to resolution by the applicant and the Staff. 5. If a parking lot abuts a dedicated road or the north/south driveway then the one tree per 40 feet of frontage shall meet the vehicular use area perimeter requirement as well as street requirement as well as the street tree requirement. 6. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed, or any portion retained to be developed in a future phase, shall be landscaped with a lawn at a minimum. A minimum greenbelt of 25 feet shall be maintained between adjoining property line and any parking area or structure except for the additional parking spaces in Subarea B and PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated along the east and west sides of the proposed north/south driveway where the minimum green belt shall be 10 feet. Required mounding can be placed in this area 8. Site unity will be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade, evergreen, and ornamental trees) as in the adjoining Tuttle Crossing development. New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. 9. Each ground sign (4 total) will be landscaped according to the submitted plans (see attached plan 1 thru 4) for the type of planting and its location around each individual sign. Sienaee and Graphics 1. All signage and graphics shall conform to the Sign Code unless modified by this text. 2. All signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks of the Code . 3. No sign shall be painted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence. No wall murals shall be allowed. 4. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 5. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 6. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 7. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. 8. The size of the site, the freeway frontage, the obscuration of view from southbound I -270 and the fact that neither wall or ground signage on the freeway side of the site will be visible at the access point on Rings Road create special signage needs for the site. The following sign provisions shall be permitted for the site: a. Two (2) wall signs, each totaling 300 sq. ft. shall be permitted facing I -270 (one on the 5455 building and one on the 5475 building -see number 9 and 10 on the site plan). i. The I -270 wall signs shall be limited to either black or blue for the text. ii. Any logo be the same color as the text. iii. The logo may also use white as an additional color. b. One 6 -foot high ground sign with a maximum of 80 sq. ft. will be allowed at the intersection of Rings Road and Atrium Parkway. Tenant panels shall be limited to tenant names only. Logos are not permitted on individual tenant panels. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6/23/11 PZC Conditions Incorporated c. One 6 -foot high ground sign with a maximum of 50 sq. ft. will be allowed at the right in/ right out access point off Rings Road (see number 4 on the site plan) and shall be restricted to address only. d. One 6 -foot high ground sign with a maximum size of 80 sq. ft. will be allowed at intersection of Atrium Parkway and the southern access drive (see number 2 on the site plan).Tenant panels shall be limited to tenant names only. Logos are not permitted on individual tenant panels. e. One 6 -foot high ground sign with a maximum size of 50 sq. ft. shall be allowed at the main entry into the site (see number 3 on site plan). Tenant panels shall be limited to tenant names only. Logos are not permitted on individual tenant panels. f One set of address labels shall be permitted per building (both 5455 and 5475), with 30 -inch tall numbers located a maximum of 30 feet high on the east fagade of the buildings (see number 5 and 6 on the site plan) and one set of address numerals shall be permitted per building (both 5455 and 5475) with 30 -inch tall numbers located a maximum of 30 feet high on the west side fagade of the building (see numbers 7 and 8 on the site plan). Li tin Except as otherwise state herein: 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff fixtures. 2. All types of parking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. 3. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood or dark brown, black, or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. 5. Cutoff type landscape and building up lighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. All building illuminations shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 9. Landscape lighting along Rings Road or Paul Blazer Parkway shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. Fence /Walls No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted, except in areas where such are required by ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) or federal regulations. :i Cno G.7 t== . 1 a r" C s� 475 Svolh T" Nufth To a d � 1 E 1. 2 3 4 5 6. 7. 8. 9 10 L ' h Monument Sign Monument Sign Monument Sign Monument Sign 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals Wall Mntd Tenant Name Wall Mntd Tenant Name d I l � R CN PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATIONS SIGNAGE 7 CONSULTANTS'' 870E FIFTH A H I COLUMBUS, 011I 0 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= Cno G.7 t== . 1 a r" C s� 475 Svolh T" Nufth To a d � 1 E 1. 2 3 4 5 6. 7. 8. 9 10 L ' h Monument Sign Monument Sign Monument Sign Monument Sign 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals 24" Address Numerals Wall Mntd Tenant Name Wall Mntd Tenant Name d I l � R CN PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATIONS SIGNAGE 7 CONSULTANTS'' 870E FIFTH A H I COLUMBUS, 011I 0 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= h' • �i• � 1 J j Sign 1 MAIN MONUMENT ENTRY SIGN 80 s/f 6'x 13' overall ' T 54 5475 2 CC © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= 7 A 870 E. FIFTH AVE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAN (614)297 -1007 APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC ANY DISCLOSURE OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, 0 " 01 -04 -11 "Ev'510`5 04 -28 -2011 NUMBER CUSTOMER DUKE ATRIUM II DUBLIN OHIO 5C ALE NONE —Amm 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD L, SHEET OF SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" ENTRY DRIVE TENANT MONUMENT SIGN 80 s/f 6'X 13' overall Sign 1 ip 0 ' © 51GNAGE CONSULTANTS= SIGNAGE 7 CONSULTANTS= 1 870 E FIFTH AVE / COLUMB05, OHIO 45201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED MA`N1NGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. ANY 06CYMIF OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSLLTANTS INC IS STRICTLY FIX)II-MIED. DATE 01 -04 -11 REVI5IOH5 04 -28 -2011 NUMBER cuss f DUKE ATRIUM If DUBLIN OHIO xALE NONE 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD BY L SHEET OF - SCALE: 114 " =1' -0" Biel 3 ENTRY DRIVE MONUMENT SIGN 50 s/f 6'X 8.25' overall 8' -4" 5455 0%7` TENANT NAME =02 © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= 5IGHAGE 7w / ' CONSULTANTS= CO E. FIFTH COLU / I MBUS, 011h10 10 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. ANY DISCLOSURE OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATI 01 -04 -11 m 04 -28 -2011 nunaef; cusTonen DUKE ATRIUM II DUBLIN OHIO xALe NONE Locnnon 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD By L. sHeeT of SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" U-1011 3455 RINGS ROAD 5475 6' -0" SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= 7A 1 SIGNAGE CONSULTANT5� 870 E. FIFTH AVE. COLUMBUS, OHIO 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. ANY DISCLOSURE OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WM40U`T THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. °^T" 01 -04 -11 `5`5 04 -28 -2011 - HUMBER CUSTOMER DUKE ATRIUM II DUBLIN OHIO scmz NONE L«Anom 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD ICY L. SHEET of imI) 57AAdr SECONDARY MONUMENT ENTRY SIGN Sign 4 50 s/f 6'X 8.25' overall 4" .I ti ADDRESS NUMERALS EAST 30" height over all SIGMAGE E COMSULTAMT5 870 FIFTH AVE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43201 (614)297 -7446 FM (614)297 -1007 I I I hL L 1 i 5475 -.. 11, Signs 5, 6 T -0 1/2" INDIVIDUALLY 2' -6 " FABRICATED ALUMINUM NUMERALS FINISH COATED SATIN BLACK. 2" DEEP RETURNS. 30" OVERALL HEIGHT. STUD MOUNT TO EXTERIOR FACIA. 5475 SCALE: 1/4"=l'- © 51GHAGE COMSULTAMTS= APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. ANY DISCLOSURE OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATE 01 -04 -11 REVISIONS O4 -28 -2011 NUMBER CUSTOMER DUKE ATRIUM II DUBLIN OHIO scA,LE NONE LOCATION 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD BY L. SHEET OF r � ;„ r ;) 5' 7,4F l�- Visibility of address signage from Atrium Parkway m am Im" i475 ADDRESS NUMERALS WEST Signs 7, 8 30" height over all T-0 1/2" -.., ! m INDIVIDUALLY 21-611 FABRICATED ALUMINUM NUMERALS FINISH COATED 15455 SATIN BLACK. 2" DEEP RETURNS 5475 30" OVERALL HEIGHT. STUD MOUNT TO EXTERIOR FACIA. SCALE: 114 " =1' -0" © SIGMAGE COMSULTAMT5= 7 A 9115MA15E C0M5ULTAMT5= E. FIFTH AVE COL COLUMBUS, ON F110 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 ipie }57f Pd, F I 7' Aarnncpt Signs 9 APPROVED: S I G M AG E F M UBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CCk sF7DEiv1TAL MfD P IZON QTY 7 CONSULTANT OF THEM WITHOUT THE WR ITEM CONSENT OF STC-,TAGE 1 FIFTH AVE. 04 -28 -2011 11 8701 I COWMSUS, OHIO 43201 KE ATRIUM II Dl (614)2 4)297 -6 LOCATION 5455 -5475 RINI FAX (614)297 -1007 © SIGMAGE CONSULTANTS= DATE: CONSNTANTS.INC. AN1 WaOSURF BBC. TS STRICTLY P MUMBW IN OHIO - ROAD BY L. 5HEET OF 1';)4.9 - ,?3 ad F WALL MOUNTED TENANT NAME WEST 300 s/f Day -Night Style Channel Letter Signage Al[atel•Luc(e FI t WALL MOUNTED TENANT NAME WEST 300 s/f Day -Night Channel Letter Signage Color to be as follows: Day: Black Night: White - 28' -11" 6' -0" =� U is Lucen r I ca e N © 51GHAGE CONSULTAHT5= SIGNAGE COMSULTAMTS= 7 A 870 E. FIFTh AVE 1 COLUMBUS, OHIO 43201 (614)297 -7446 FAX (614)297 -1007 APPROVED: DATE: THE CONTENTS OF SUBMITTED DRAWINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPERTY OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC ANY DISCLOSURE OR REPRODUCTION OF THEM WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED DATE 01 -04 -11 REVISIO 04 -28 -2011 NUMBER CUSTOMER DUKE ATRIUM II DUBLIN OHIO scAu NONE L 5455 -5475 RINGS ROAD B L SKEET OF Pond V�AVIIIV !y f s ya Y� - _r_: JUNIPERUS S. 'BUFFALO' 'GREEN MOUNTAIN' BOXWOOD 2430x l x K� J+� rEN1 0 BRICKAIAN £riluurcn,y the Amrr— Gerulu.gra ,Sir ca 79;9 [Nx x.rper xE f.a .b UIbVkUi Id tl11 i1ov00 vr..vherkr.me,gm,pwm raa. -27— This drawing and any and all Ideas and designs contained herein are the sole property of Brickman and are not to be used without written permisslon. Atrium II 5455 -5475 Rings Road Dublin, Ohio DATE May 23, 2011 REVISIONS July 12, 2011 1 bah — 10 fwR W Sign 1 Landscape Plan DESIGN Ron Dickerson ACCOUNT MANAGER Todd Higdon SHEET wunaER ROSE'SUNNY KNOCKOUT' a lx- -- i r \IVVVr \VV i tfJ JUNIPERUS S. 'BUFFALO' 1 'GREEN MOUNTAIN' BOXWOOD 24-30" 'GREEN MOUNTAIN' BOXWOOD,.., 5 ROSE 'SUNNY KNOCKOUT' #3 18 JUNIPERUS S 'BUFFALO' #3 4 HYDRANGEA P. 'QUICK FIRE' #5 1 'GREEN MOUNTAIN' BOXWOOD 24 -30" O BRICKMAN £rJ,ur, c'r {y 1', Am irurr .Sm- 7939 llel Harper HE ua umpu¢ wlol4Uf Tel ela.IN— This drawing and any and all Ideas and designs contained herein are the sole property of Brlckman and are not to be used an written permission. Atrium II 5455 -5475 Rings Road Dublin, Ohio DATE May 23, 2011 REVISIONS July 12, 2011 ib1ch -10 fog o - to Sign 2 Landscape Plan DESIGN Ron Dickerson ACCOUNT MANAGER Todd Higdon 7 SHEET MU ER ROSE'SUNNY KNOCKOUT' HYDRANGEA P. 'QUICK FIRE' PAINTED ACCENT 3 5455 J TENANT NAME I� 6-2 " 13 - f 5475 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF ALL GROUND SIGNS SIGN CABINETS TO BE ALL ALUMINUM FABRICATION WITH REMOVABLE TENANT PANELS. ALL COMPONENTS TO BE FINISH COATED EXTERIOR POLYURETHANE SATIN FINISHES. COLORS TO BE BLACK AND SANDSTONE. ADDRESS NUMERALS TO BE DIMENSIONAL' /2 "THICK PVC PAINTED BLACK SIGNAGE 7 CONSULTANTS= A 870 E FIFTH AVE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43201 (614)297 -7446 FA?, (614)297 -1007 © SIGNAGE CONSULTANTS= CITY OF DUBLIN_ LOW Un 4 d Len l.w. 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016.1236 Phone/ TOD: 614-411}1600 Fax: 614 -410 -4747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us Creating a Legacy PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JUNE 23, 2011 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PUD, Atrium II 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP 5475 and 5455 Rings Road Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Proposal: Modifications to the development text regarding the sign requirements for the Atrium II office complex located within the Chakeres Wheatley Puckett Planned Unit Development. The site is located on south side of Rings Road at the intersection of Atrium Parkway. Request: Review and recommendation to City Council of a rezoning /preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Duke Realty; represented by Ben W. Hale Jr., Smith & Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planner II. Planning Information: (614) 410 -4690, jrauch @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend approval to City Council for this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan because it complies with all applicable review criteria and provides a comprehensive building tenant identification for the office complex, with six conditions: 1) The development text be changed to limit the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road (Sign 4) entrance to address only. 2) The development text be changed to decrease the permitted size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) from 104 to 80 square feet and reduce the height to 6 feet. 3) The development text be changed to state the maximum height of the address numbers (Signs 5 -8) at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage. 4) The development text be changed to limit the 1 -270 wall signs (Signs 9 & 10) to either black or blue, and allow white as an additional color for the logo. 5) The development text continue prohibiting painted on wall signs. 6) The development text be changed to limit tenant panels to copy only. *Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 6- 1. RESULT: Approval of this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan is recommended to City Council. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JUNE 23, 2011 4. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PUD, Atrium 11 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP 5475 and 5455 Rings Road Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan MOTION #2: To approve this Final Development Plan because it complies with all applicable review criteria and the development standards, with nine conditions: 1) The design of the ground sign at Rings Road (Sign 4) be address only. 2) The ground sign at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) be reduced to 80 square feet, six feet in height. 3) All ground signs (Sign 1 & 4) must be located 8 feet from the ROW. 4) The 1 -270 wall signs (Signs 9 & 10) be limited to either black or blue, and allow white as an additional color for the logo. 5) Final design of 1 -270 wall sign for the south tower (Sign 10) be approved by Planning. 6) The ground signs be framed with evergreens on both ends, subject to approval by Planning. 7) The tenant panel frames be the same color as the sign panels. 8) The applicant work with Planning to ensure that all sign cabinets are constructed of high quality. 9) Sign 3 be relocated to the landscape island closest to the building entrance. *Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 6-1. RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION 4 J rifer . Rauch, AICP Planner II Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 19 4. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PUD, Atrium II 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP 5475 and 5455 Rings Road Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chair Amorose Groomes introduced this application for a site located on the south side of Rings Road at the intersection of Atrium Parkway. She said the application consisted of a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan and a Final Development Plan and two motions would be required. She explained the rezoning would go to City Council for the final decision and the Commission was the final authority on the final development plan application. Ms. Amorose Groomes swore in those who wished to address the Commission on this case including Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith & Hale, LLC, representing the applicant, Amy D'Amore, Duke Realty, and City representatives. Jennifer Rauch presented the case. She explained the preliminary development plan finalizes the development text and the final development plan includes the final design details for the proposed signs. She presented the overall site plan for the Atrium II office complex. She said the approved development text permits one ground sign at Rings Road and two flanking the Atrium Parkway entrance drive, and a ground sign and a wall sign facing 1 -270. She said the applicant is proposing to change the text to permit a total of four ground signs, the existing sign at the Rings Road intersection, a ground sign at the Rings Road and Atrium Parkway intersection, the addition of a new ground sign at the southernmost entrance drive and one for the northern entrance drive off Atrium Parkway. She said additional text changes include two wall signs in lieu of the previously approved ground sign and an increased number height for four address number signs located on either side of the building to identify which building users would enter. Ms. Rauch for Sign 1 was relocated from the southern side of the entrance drive up to the Rings Road and Atrium Parkway intersection, the applicant's proposal was for an 80- square -foot multi - tenant sign, six feet in height. She said originally, the text was for a 50 square feet sign, six feet in height. She said Planning recommends the applicant's proposal as this location is one of the main identification signs for this access point. She said the design of Signs 1, 2, and 3, all have a cream - colored cabinet with individual tenant panels and the address located on the top, mounted on a black base. Ms. Rauch described Sign 2, as an additional multi- tenant sign to be located at the southern entrance drive, which the applicant proposes at 104 square feet, eight feet in height. She said Planning recommends the sign be decreased to 50 square feet, six feet in height, to be consistent with the other signs proposed for the interior of the site. Ms. Rauch said Sign 3, on the north side of the entrance drive on Atrium Parkway, was proposed by the applicant to be 50 square feet, six feet in height, which was consistent with the original development text, and Planning recommends it remain the same. Ms. Rauch said Sign 4 retains the same location at the Rings Road, right -in /right -out entrance, also at 50 square feet and six feet in height. She said Planning recommends this sign be limited to an 'address -only' sign and the proposed development text be modified to stipulate this. Ms. Rauch said wall Signs 9 and 10 are proposed to be on the north tower for Alcatel Lucent and the southern tower for a future unknown tenant. Ms. Rauch said similar to that, Planning is recommending as part of this proposal, that it be limited to one color for both signs and that the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 19 final design of this sign be subject to approval by Planning, based on the final text approved by the Commission and City Council. Ms. Rauch said the applicant is requesting an additional six -inch height to the address numbers which per Code would be based on the setback of the building which limits them to 24 inches in height. She said the text, as proposed included a square footage and to make it clearer, Planning recommends the letter height be called out for those numbers at 30 inches in height. She said the address numbers are shown on of the two buildings on east and west elevations, indicating which building a user would enter as the buildings function separately. Ms. Rauch said that Planning recommends approval as the criteria either met, or met with conditions for the rezoning with preliminary development plan with three conditions: I . The development text be changed to limit the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road (Sign 4) entrance to address only. 2. The development text be changed to decrease the permitted size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) to 50 square feet square feet and 6 feet in height. 3. The development text be changed to state the maximum height of the address numbers (Signs 5 -8) at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage. Ms. Rauch said the final development plan meets the criteria with five conditions and Planning recommends approval: 1. The development text be changed to limit the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road (Sign 4) entrance to address only. 2. The development text be changed to decrease the permitted size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) to 50 square feet square feet and 6 feet in height. 3. The development text be changed to state the maximum height of the address numbers (Signs 5 -8) at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage. 4. That all ground signs located in a public road must be located eight feet from a public right of way consistent with code. 5. One color is chosen for the logo and copy of the two wall signs along interstate 270 and the final design of the wall sign for the southern tower be approved by planning. Ben W. Hale, Jr. said it was difficult to find this building. He said Nationwide was only occupied by its employees, but now this building was becoming a multi- tenant building. He said Duke strongly feels it is necessary to identify the tenants occupying the building. He said they agree with all Planning's recommendations, except the one about the southern sign off Atrium Parkway. Mr. Hale said the applicant thinks a majority of people coming to this building will not be able to locate it. He said staff suggested reducing Sign 2 from 104 to 50 square feet and the applicant would love to keep the bigger size. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if anyone would like to speak in respect to the application. [There were no comments.] Mr. Budde asked if there will only ever be two wall mounted signs Ms. Rauch said yes, per the proposed text. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 19 Mr. Budde said he would agree with Mr. Hale regarding the bigger sign on the south entrance Mr. Zimmerman said when he is looking for a building he is looking for a number rather than the tenant. He said once they have reached the property drivers tend to try to orient themselves to the tenants. Mr. Fishman said he would like to see the signs framed with landscaping, and he was concerned the signs do not follow the architecture of the building. He said the landscaping should not block the sign, but should make them look less obtrusive. Mr. Hale said tenants want their name visible on the building. Mr. Fishman said he has no problem putting the name on the sign, but he agrees with staff on the size of the sign. Aimee D'Amore, Duke Realty Corporation, 5600 Blazer Parkway, stated they have every intention of landscaping all of the exterior signage. She said they are trying to assist those who currently work in the building and the new tenants. She said it is critical to offer branding on the outside of the facility to help fill the tenant space. Mr. Zimmerman said he would like to see the landscaping blend with the sign. Ms. D'Amore said they are concerned with reducing the sign size on the south side. She said if they reduce the size of the sign, they would not be able to list the tenants. Ms. D'Amore said they feel the 80 square feet is necessary at the minimum due to the size of the building and the potential number of tenants the building could hold. She said instead of asking for reduction from 104 to 50 square feet that they could ask for reduction from 104 to 80 square feet, which would match the sign on the north side of Atrium Parkway. Ms. D'Amore said Signs 1 and 2 are actually on Atrium Parkway and the third one is the same sign, but it is at the drive entrance. Ms. Kramb asked if that sign is not the same size as the others and which tenants will be listed. Ms. D'Amore said the sign will be seen driving up to the building and will have all the names on it. Ms. Kramb stated that they can still get all the names on Sign 3. Ms. Dunmore said they will be much smaller because the sign will be right by your car. Ms. Kramb said she is okay with making Signs 1 and 2 both 80 square feet. She said going from the existing to the new proposed text she noticed language deleted that prohibited any signs located on the surface of the building. She said she would like to keep that language. Ms. Kramb asked if we are making sure there are not any logos on the multi- tenant sign just names. She asked if that needs to be put into the proposed text. Ms. Amorose Groomes requested a condition that says text is limited to one color. Mr. Fishman said he would go with the 80 square feet to be consistent, but he would like to have landscaping higher than the signs. He said to have tall trees that do not block the lettering, but frame the sign. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 -Meeting Minutes Page 14 of 19 Ms. Amorose Groomes said we can ask for a backdrop of landscaping Ms. Rauch suggested a condition that requires the ground signs be framed with evergreens or other landscaping on both sides subject to approval by Planning. Mr. Zimmerman said he will agree on Sign 2 being 80 square feet. Mr. Hardt said he is fine with the highway signs and addresses on the building. He said he agrees that 80 square feet is appropriate for Sign 2. He said he would like to ask the aluminum frame that separates the panels from the sign be the same color as the background on the multi - tenant sign. He said he is concerned about the quantity of the ground signs. He said Signs 1 and 2 will collect traffic coming from the north or the south. He said he is not sure what Signs 3 and 4's purpose is. Mr. Zimmerman said the way the road drops the sign is needed. Mr. Hardt said there is a full service curb cut at Sign 1. Mr. Zimmerman said Sign 4 will have just addresses and not tenant panels. Mr. Hardt said there is no other building where we have allowed a sign at every curb cut Dana McDaniel said a unique example would be Dublin Methodist Hospital. He said there is one tenant with a lot of directional signage. He said there are other places in Dublin which have guiding signs on their site. He said the nature of this building is changing and becoming a multi - tenant building which needs to be reviewed differently. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked Mr. Hardt if he would feel more comfortable if Sign 3 were internal. Mr. Hardt said Sign 3 is the least functional of the group; the driver is already on the site once they get to that sign. He said he understands the changing nature of the building and the necessary marketing forces. Ms. D'Amore said she understands it is a larger number of signs than what is typical but with the change of the buildings' occupancy, it is a 300,000- square -foot, multi- tenant building. She said this may be the largest multi- tenant building in Dublin. She said she would ask that be considered as part of the decision process. Mr. Taylor said he agrees with the Sign 2 at 80 square feet, Sign 3 bothers him because it is in such close proximity to Sign 1. He said maybe the sign could be more internal to the site to help guide visitors. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if the sign could be located within the island. Ms. D' Amore said she thinks it could and it will still serve the purpose. Ms. Amorose Groomes said moving the sign would make it more internal. Mr. Taylor said he is used to seeing more detail in signs about what the base is made of. Ms. D'Amore said the intent of the sign is to match the architecture of the building; this building has a reddish color precast which is hard to match. She said she wanted to go with black as a Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 15 of 19 way to avoid having two colors of precast. She said the circular feature is something that is utilized on both entrances of the atrium. Mr. Taylor asked the material of the base. Ms. D'Amore said it is black precast. Mr. Taylor said he does not need to see it again in terms of detail but he does want staff to review the materials, in particular the structure of the cabinets. He said he wants to ensure this is high quality cabinet. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would like to see Sign 3 relocated and it would serve its purpose better if it were closer to the building to provide a point of clarity. She said it will take the sign off the street. Mr. Fishman said the framing needs to be an evergreen. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked Mr. Hale if he agreed to the six conditions for the Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan. Mr. Hale agreed to the conditions. Motion #1 and Vote - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Mr. Taylor made the motion to recommend approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan because it complies with the applicable criteria and the existing development standards with six conditions: 1. The development text be changed to limit the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road (Sign 4) entrance to address only. 2. The development text be changed to decrease the permitted size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) from 104 to 80 square feet and reduce the height to 6 feet. 3. The development text be changed to state the maximum height of the address numbers (Signs 5 -8) at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage. 4. The development text be changed to limit the 1 -270 wall signs (Signs 9 & 10) to either black or blue, and white is an additional color allowed for the logo. 5. The development text continue prohibiting painted on wall signs. 6. The text be changed to limit tenant panels to copy only. Mr. Zimmerman seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes, Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, no; Mr. Taylor, yes and Mr. Budde, yes. (Approved 6 - 1.) Ms. Amorose Groomes asked Mr. Hale if he agreed to the nine conditions for the Final Development Plan. Mr. Hale agreed to the conditions. Motion #2 and Vote - Final Development Plan Mr. Taylor made the motion to approve this Final Development Plan because it meets the applicable review criteria, will meet the preliminary development plan and the development standards in the area with 9 conditions: 1. The design of the ground sign at Rings Road (Sign 4) be address only. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 -Meeting Minutes Page 16 of 19 2. The ground sign at the southern entrance drive (Sign 2) be reduced to 80 square feet, six feet in height. 3. All ground signs (Sign 1 & 4) must be located 8 feet from the ROW. 4. The 1 -270 wall signs (Signs 9 & 10) be limited to either black or blue and allow white as an additional color allowed for the logo. 5. Final design of 1 -270 wall sign for the south tower (Sign 10) be approved by Planning. 6. The ground signs be framed with evergreens on both ends, subject to approval by Planning. 7. That the tenant panel frames be the same color as the sign panels. 8. The applicant work with Planning to ensure that all sign cabinets be constructed of high quality. 9. Sign 3 be relocated to the landscape island closest to the building entrance. Mr. Zimmerman seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes, Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, no; Mr. Taylor, yes and Mr. Budde, yes. (Approved 6 - 1.) CITY OF DUBLIN- Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 4301 &1236 Phone /TDD: 614410 -4600 Fax: 614 -410 -4747 Web Site:w .dublin.oh.us City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Report Thursday, June 23, 2011 Chakeres Wheatley Puckett, Atrium II Case Summary Agenda Item 4 Case Number 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Site Location 5475 and 5455 Rings Road Proposal Modifications to the development text regarding the sign requirements for the Atrium II office complex located within the Chakeres Wheatley Puckett Planned Commerce District. The proposal has no site modifications. Requests Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan & Final Development Plan Review and recommendation to City Council under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 for the rezoning with preliminary development plan Review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Site Location 5475 Rings Road South side of Rings Road, at the intersection of Atrium Parkway. Owner /Applicant Duke Realty. Representative Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith & Hale LLC. Case Manager Jennifer Rauch, AICP, Planner II (614) 410 -4690 1 jrauch@dublin.oh.us Planning Recommendation Recommendation of approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan with three conditions; Approval of a final development plan with five conditions. In Planning's opinion, this proposal complies with all applicable review criteria and the existing development standards and approval with conditions is recommended. Conditions - Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 1) The fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road entrance be limited to address only. 2) The size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive be decreased from 104 to 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet in height. 3) The development text be modified to state the maximum height of the address numbers at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage calculation. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 1 1 034Z/PDP/FDP I Atrium Thursday, June 23, 2011 I Page 2of12 ContlPoOr% —Float Develop men Plan 1) The ground sign at the Rings Road entrance as an address only sign. 2) The ground sign at the southern entrance drive be reduced In area from 10410 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet In height. 3) All ground signs must be located 8 feet from the right of way, consistent with Code. 4) One color for the copy and the logo be selected for both 4270 wall signs. 51 Final design of the 4270 wall sign for south tower be approved by Planning. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 3 of 12 Facts Site Area 20 acres Zoning PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres Wheatley Puckett) r rounding Zoning North: OLR, Office, Laboratory and Research District East and South: PCD, Planned Commerce District West: Interstate-270 Site Features • Two, five story buildings totaling 310,000 square feet connected by a glass atrium. The two buildings operate independently from each other and are addressed separately. • Two large parking areas located at front and rear of the building. • Access from Rings Road and two driveways on Atrium Parkway. Case Background 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission approved a parking lot expansion on August 20, 1998. 1997 City Council approved Ordinance 40 -97 on June 2, 1997, rezoning 29.35 acres for the Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PCD to permit 310,000 square feet of office use. The rezoning was to incorporate additional acreage within a PCD rezoning ordinance (Ordinance 33 -97) approved April 14, 1997 that approved 17.23 acres for office use. I I The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a development plan and a revised development plan for the construction of the Atrium II office complex on January 2, 1997 and May 1, 1997. 1 1 1995 City Council on August 7, 1995 approved a rezoning (Ordinance 23 -95) of 14.114 acres for office and hotel uses. Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Proposal The proposed development text modifies the sign provisions for Atrium 11 to allow for a reconfiguration of the previously approved ground signs, provide two wall signs along the 1 -270 frontage, and increase the letter height for the building address numbers. Existing Sign The approved development text identified the unique sign needs for the site Provisions given the building entrance and vantage points from the public roadway system, and permitted the following signs for the Atrium 11 site: • 3 ground signs along Rings Road and Atrium Parkway, • 1 wall along the 1 -270 frontage • 1 ground si gn along the -270 frontage. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 4 of 12 Details Existing Sign Table Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan The number, size and location are noted below. J Proposed Sign The proposed development text modifications continue to identify the Provisions unique sign needs for the site, and propose the signs shown in the following table for Atrium II. Overall Provisions North South Rings Atrium Building Building 1 -270 Address Road Parkway Entrance Entrance Frontage Numbers Road Parkway Drive Drive Frontage Numbers Type Ground - Ground - Ground /Wall - Number 1 - 2 - 2 - Area 1 1 1 1 300 each - (sq. ft.) 50 - 50 each - (Per Code) Height 6 - 6 - Per Code 18 each (ft) 6 6 Either 8 Per Code 30 ( ft ) side of Location Entrance - northern - Along I -270 _ Drive frontage entrance drive J Proposed Sign The proposed development text modifications continue to identify the Provisions unique sign needs for the site, and propose the signs shown in the following table for Atrium II. Overall Provisions The applicant's sign proposal seeks to address the need for building and individual tenant identification for the two buildings. The goal of the applicant is appropriate given that by definition there are two separate buildings, which would permit different sign provisions if it was developed as two properties without the connecting atrium. Ground Signs The applicant has proposed four ground signs, two of which are 80 and 104 square feet, exceeding the text permitted area of 50 square feet. The number and size of the proposed ground signs exceeds what would typically be permitted for a single office complex. However, this situation is unique with two large multi- tenant buildings on a single site. Planning recommends permitting the three multi- tenant ground signs along Atrium Parkway, but that the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road entrance be limited to address numbers only. Planning also recommends Northern Southern Rings Atrium I -270 Address Entrance Entrance Road Parkway Frontage Numbers Drive Drive Type Ground Ground Ground Ground Wall Wall Number 1 1 1 1 2 4 Area 300 each (sq. ff.) 50 80 50 104 (Per Code) 18 each Height 6 6 6 8 Per Code 30 ( ft ) The applicant's sign proposal seeks to address the need for building and individual tenant identification for the two buildings. The goal of the applicant is appropriate given that by definition there are two separate buildings, which would permit different sign provisions if it was developed as two properties without the connecting atrium. Ground Signs The applicant has proposed four ground signs, two of which are 80 and 104 square feet, exceeding the text permitted area of 50 square feet. The number and size of the proposed ground signs exceeds what would typically be permitted for a single office complex. However, this situation is unique with two large multi- tenant buildings on a single site. Planning recommends permitting the three multi- tenant ground signs along Atrium Parkway, but that the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road entrance be limited to address numbers only. Planning also recommends City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 5 of 12 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan allowing the proposed 80 square foot ground sign located at the intersection of Rings Road and Atrium Parkway, as it is the main office complex entrance. However, the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive should be decreased from 104 to 50 square feet and 6 feet in height. Wall Signs The applicant proposes to modify the development text to permit two wall signs, in lieu of the wall and ground sign combination previously permitted along the 1 -270 frontage. A 300 square feet wall sign would be located on each of the two buildings fronting 1 -270, which meets Code. Address Numbers Analysis Process 1) Consistency with Dublin Zoning Code Conditions 1 - 3 The proposal also includes address number signs exceeding the Code requirement of a 24 -inch height. The applicant proposes 30 -inch address numbers on the front and rear of each building, to provide wayfinding for users and visitors to the building. The proposed development text provides four, 18- square -foot address signs. To make the height provision more clear, Planning recommends the text be modified to permit the number height at 30 i nches, in lieu of the square foo tage calcul ation. Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning /preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. Criterion met with conditions: The proposed development text modifications address the unique needs of the site, as carried forward from the previously approved text. The characteristics of this site are unique and it is recommended that the proposed text be modified as follows to retain the intent of the previous development text: ,2J Conformance with adopted Plans 3) Advancement of general welfare & orderly development 4) Effects on adjacent uses 1) The fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road entrance be limited to address only. 2) The size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive be decreased from 104 to 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet in height. 3) The height of the number be permitted at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage calculation. Criterion met: The Community Plan identifies the land use for these sites as Premium Office. No modifications are proposed. Criterion met: The proposed sign plan would provide increased wayfinding for users and visitors of the site. Criterion met: The proposed signs do not affect the adjacent uses. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 6 of 12 5J Adequacy open spac residential 6) Protection natural fea and resoun 7) Adequate infrastructu 8) Traffic and pedestrian safety 9) Coordinate integration building & relationshi 10) Developm layout and intensity 11) Stormwate managem 12) Communit benefit 13) Design an appearan( 14) Developm( phasing 15) Adequacy public sere 16) Infrastructu contributio of N Not applicable. for of C Criterion met: No modifications are proposed. Lures ,es J N Not applicable. Criterion met: None of the proposed signs interfere with pedestrian or vehicular safety. on & I I Criterion met: The proposal provides for an integrated design scheme that of r recognizes the unique relationship of the wayfinding needs to the layout of Recommendation Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria and provides comprehensive building and tenant identification for the overall office complex. Approval is recommended with conditions. Conditions 1) The development text be modified to limit the fourth ground sign proposed at the Rings Road entrance as an address only sign. 2) The development text be modified to decrease the permitted size of the ground sign proposed at the southern entrance drive from 104 to 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet in height. 3) The development text be modified to state the maximum height of the address numbers at 30 inches, in lieu of the square footage City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 7 of 12 Details Pr� F — G round Signs Final Development Plan The applicant is proposing four ground signs along Rings Road and Atrium Parkway, two wall signs along the 1 -270 frontage, and four address signs for the Atrium II office complex. The proposed ground signs include three multi- tenant signs and one address sign. The three proposed multi- tenant signs are of similar design with a rectangular cream cabinet mounted on a black base. The sign cabinet contains individual tenant panels on each half of the cabinet, which is separated by a black band. The black address numbers are proposed on the top of each cabinet and landscaping is provided around the base. The details of the multi- tenant signs are as follows: Atrium Parkway and Rings Road Intersection (Sign 1) I An 80 square foot sign, 6 feet tall located on the southwest corner of the intersection; meets the development text as proposed. Southern entrance drive (Sign 2) A 104 square foot sign, 8 feet tall located on the northwest corner of the entrance drive. Planning recommended the development text be modified to reduce the area and height to 50 square feet and 6 feet in height. The proposed sign should be modified to meet this recommendation. Northern entrance drive (Sign 3) A 50 square foot sign, 6 feet tall located on the northwest corner of the entrance drive; meets the development text as proposed. Rings Road address sign (Sign 4) The proposed address ground sign is of a similar design to the multi- tenant ground signs with a cream cabinet and black address numbers and copy. The sign is proposed on western side of the right -in, right -out entrance from Rings Road, and is 50 square feet and 6 feet tall. Planning recommended the development text be modified to limit the to an address only sign. Wall Signs The applicant is proposing two 300 square foot wall signs - one wall sign for each of the two buildings fronting 1 -270, which meets Code. The proposed signs have individual channel letters and are limited to one color, per Code. Wall Signs (Signs 9 and 10) The wall sign for the north tower has individual day -night channel letters for the copy and the logo, located on the top of the building's 1 -270 elevation. The proposed sign area is 155 square feet for the copy and the logo. The logo meets secondary image requirements of 20 percent of the total permitted sign area. The copy is black and the logo is dark blue circle with a white emblem. Code limits 1 -270 wall signs to one color. The applicant should select one color for the copy and the logo to meet Code, as part of the previous application review City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 8 of 12 Details Address Signs Analysis Process Final Development Plan II The south tower is unoccupied, but the wall sign would be limited to individual channel letters of a single color for the copy and any logo, with to a maximum of 300 square feet. Planning recommends the channel letter colors match the color chosen for the north tower. The applicant proposes the use of 30 -inch address numbers to delineate the two buildings on the front and rear of building, to provide wayfinding for users and visitors to the building. Address Signs (Signs 5 -8) The proposed address numbers are individual aluminum numerals with a satin black finish, which will be mounted 30 feet high on the front and rear ele vations of the building. I Final Development Plan Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a final development plan (full text of criteria attached). Follo is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. _ _ I Consistency Criterion met with conditions: This proposal is consistent with the with the requirements of the approved preliminary development plan through the approved approval of the development text modifications and with the following preliminary recommendations: development plan. 1) The design of the ground sign at the Rings Road entrance should be an address only sign. 2) The ground sign at the southern entrance drive should be reduced in area from 104 to 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet in height. 3) All ground signs must be located 8 feet from the right -of -way, to meet Code. Conditions 1 -5 4) One color for the copy and the logo must be selected for both 1 -270 wall signs. 5) Final design of the 1 -270 wall sign for south tower should be approved by Planning. 2) Traffic and Criterion met: No modifications are proposed to vehicular or pedestrian pedestrian circulation. safety I 3) Adequate public services and open space 4) Protection of natural features and resources 3) Adequacy of Criterion met: No modifications are proposed to the existing lighting. ligh tin g City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 9 of 12 Analysis 6) Signs Criterion met with conditions: This proposal is consistent with the consistent with requirements of the approved preliminary development plan through the preliminary approval of the development text modifications and with the previously development identified conditions. plan 1 -5 7) Appropriate landscaping to enhance, buffer, & soften the building and site 8) Compliant Criterion met: No modifications are proposed to stormwater management. stormwater management 9) All phases Not applicable to this application. comply with the previous criteria. C 10) Compliance Criterion met: The proposal complies with all other known applicable local, with other laws state; and federal laws and regulations. & regulations. Recommendation Approval In Planning's analysis, development text, the development in the area with conditions. Criterion met: A landscape plan was provided for each ground sign, which meets the text. Final Development Plan Final Development Plan this proposal complies with the proposed final development plan criteria and existing Planning recommends approval of this request 1) The design of the ground sign at the Rings Road entrance should be an address only sign. 2) The ground sign at the southern entrance drive should be reduced in area from 104 to 50 square feet and reduced to 6 feet in height. 3) All ground signs must be located 8 feet from the right -of -way, consistent with Code. 4) One color for the copy and the logo must be selected for both 1 -270 wall signs. 5) Final design of the 1 -270 wall sign for south tower should be approved by Planning. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 10 of 12 REZONING /PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. In the case of a combined rezoning /preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning /preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 11 of 12 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the Planned Unit Development process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process consists of up to three stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The intent of the final development plan is to show conformance with and provide a detailed refinement of the total aspects of the approved preliminary development plan (rezoning). The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The Commission may approve as submitted, approve with modifications agreed to by the applicant, or disapprove and terminate the process. If the application is disapproved, the applicant may respond to Planning and Zoning Commission's concerns and resubmit the plan. This action will be considered a new application for review in all respects, including payment of the application fee. Appeal of any action taken by the Commission shall be to the Court of Common Pleas in the appropriate jurisdiction. Following approval by the Commission, the applicant may proceed with the building permit process. In the event that updated citywide standards are applicable, all subsequently approved final development plans shall comply with the updated standards if the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the updated standards would not cause undue hardship. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP I Atrium II Thursday, June 23, 2011 1 Page 12 of 12 Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(B) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in § 153.053(E) (4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10) The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Medco Health, b � �l0 OLR . OX s�hlan SIB- ex -Te�� Q — _ 1 • e '1 �i PC D c' d PC D CL 0 *Jill wll V II 1 SO U3 [r' - N D - • :10197 PCD 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP N City of Dublin Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Land Use and /Final Development Plan Long Range Planning Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan xmwmm=== Feet 5455 & 5475 Rings Road 0 200 400 Existing Site Plan F-,d Ib" !M "g tl � � r�ii1P`r li•HII" 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Proposed Tenant Ground Sign Design (1,2,3) Proposed Sign Locations A , V 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Proposed Ground Sign (4) Proposed Address Wall Sign (5,6,7,8) pl 9. F A Proposed Tenant Wall Sign (9,10) 1 -270 (West) Elevation N Atrium Parking (East) Elevation 1 -270 (West) Elevation � a M I.M X73 ,M, r. t F 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT The applicant wants to place all five properties under the same zoning case. This text supersedes the City initiated development text revision regarding density for the Wheatley Puckett and Chakeres Land Company Text dated February , 1997 COMPOSITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT TEXT 29.355 ACRE TRACT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RINGS ROAD BETWEEN I -270 AND PAUL BLAZER PARKWAY A) SCHEMATIC PLAN, ETC. The site is an irregular rectangle totaling 29.355 acres. The I -270 frontage is about 600 feet; Paul Blazer Parkway frontage is about 700 feet and the depth along Rings Road is about 1500 feet. The site is essentially flat with a gentle slope to the east with an existing landscape business and single family house on the eastern portion of the site. The site is of a shape that will permit efficient development with an infinite number of variations. With the exception of the portion located within the elevated roadway for the Rings Road right -of -way there are no known physical factors that interfere with full use of the site. The primary attributes of the site are its I -270 freeway frontage and a location near to the Tuttle Crossing interchange. It can be anticipated that the ultimate user of this site will seek to exploit this exposure, probably with freeway - oriented office or corporate office uses such as are located to the north, the south, and to the west, across I -270. These uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office, hotels /motels and major institutional uses. The site also has significant frontage on Paul Blazer Parkway which would permit non - freeway orientated buildings. B) PROVISION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER, ETC. 1. Water service will be accessed from the 20 inch water line that is located in the. Rings Road right -of -way, on the south side of the street. 2. Sanitary sewer service will be accessed from the 21 inch trunk line located along the north side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. 3. Surface drainage is to be determined. The Cramer Ditch, a major drainage outlet, is located along the north side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. C) TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, ETC. The site has frontage on, and access to, Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway. Due to the elevation of the Rings Road bridge over I -270, cuts will be restricted on the western portion of the site. The "ramp" for the Rings Road/I -270 bridge is long and has excellent visibility. AS SUBMITTEq TO COUNCIL `5J151 '? 7 FOR MEETING ON ,S 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT D) PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF SITE DEVELOPMENT, ETC The first phase of construction of a 310,000 square foot office building is expected to begin in the Spring of 1947. It is anticipated that if the freeway orientated portion of the site develops with a single user there will be a single phase of construction. If more than one user is involved it is anticipated that a single phase for each user will occur. E) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN SURROUNDING AREA, ETC. To the greatest degree possible, this text seeks to make this site subject to the same goals, restrictions, and quality assurances as the Tuttle Crossing development to the south and across I- 270 to the west. The development standards of Tuttle Crossing Subarea A area largely carried over into this text. The goal is to encourage development of this site as a visually integral part of the Tuttle Crossing development and be complimentary to the Ashland corporate park to the north. F) EVIDENCE OF CONTROL, ETC. All affected properties are now in the control of one developer. G) DEED RESTRICTIONS Deed restrictions, if any, will be filed at the time of conveyance of the property to end user(s). In DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEXT If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances then the Planried Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commercial District. The proposed development will compliment the adjacent uses within the Tuttle Crossing Development. The Subarea Development Standards are as follows: Subareas Tlie development plali for the subject property creates two subareas. Subarea A consists of 29.027 acres which contains the proposed 310,000 square foot office building along with ground for future development. Subarea 13 consists of .328 acres located on the southern portion of the site and will be used for landscaping and parking for the Atrium building as part of the revision to the driveway layout between the Atrium and BMW buildings. Ccneral 2 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT 1. It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office park development. 2. Mid -rise, signature type offices with parking structures will be promoted along freeway frontage. 3. Building elevations, plans and materials will be submitted for approval as part bf the Development Plan in order to ensure that the quality standards required by this text have been met. 4. The same palette of landscaping materials will be utilized in a similar design manner as in the Tuttle Crossing development to ensure a coordinated landscaping treatment. Proposed developments will be focused around major water features. Wells will be used in some cases to control levels. 5. All site planning will be done in a manner consistent with prudent planning principles and practices. The following uses are permitted in Subarea A: 1. Those uses listed in Dublin Code 153.026(SO, Suburban Office and Institutional) and 153.034 (OLR, Office, Laboratory and Research) 2. Corporate offices 3. Hotel and motel 4. Institutional uses 5. Ancillary commercial or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or hotel uses. The following uses are permitted in Subarea B: Parking 2. Landscaping 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT The overall site will be developed with a maximum building area computed on the basis of acreage, exclusive of right -of -way with a maximum overall density of 17,000 square feet per acre. V1.017trUIRM-771 -!LM I T 1. Setback along I -270 shall be 50 feet for all parking areas and 75 feet for buildings. 2. - Side yards shall be 25 feet from pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for pavement. 3. Rear yards shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for-pavement. 4. All other publicly dedicated streets shall have a 25 foot pavement setback and a 50 foot building setback. 5. Setback along Paul Blazer Parkway shall be 25 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25 percent of the total area. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 70 percent of the total lot area. 7. Setback from the proposed north/south driveway shall be 15 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. The maximum height for structure shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 100 feet. The maximum height maybe extended if the structure is set back from both 1 -270 and Rings Road rights- of-way and an additional two feet beyond the required setback for every One foot oflidight above the 100 foot maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures. Parking M d_Loadine 1. Sizes, ratio, and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code, Chapter 153, 2. Bank drive -thru uses subject to conditional use provisions of Dublin Code 153.026. 4 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT 2. Bank drive -thru uses subject to conditional use provisions of Dublin Code 153.026. 3. All loading docks shall be screened according to Dublin Code, Chapter 153. 'r ul ti n 1. All accesses shall be as approved by the City Engineer. At least one full service cut shall be permitted on both Paul Blazer Parkway and Rings Road, in an appropriate location. 2. Final location and design of all accesses to be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 3. A turn lane will be provided on Rings Road if it is needed, as determined by the City Engineer. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. II •0 1. No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping 1. All landscaping shall be according to Dublin Landscape Code. 2. A continuous landscape treatment shall be provided along the I -270 frontage containing a six foot earth mound or evergreen hedge/planting. Trees shall be placed in a manner that provides a 50 percent visual opacity throughout the year. This shall be achieved by providing a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees. The deciduous trees shall be planted a minimum of 30 feet on center with a minimum installation size of 2.5 inches caliper measured at a height of 12 inches above ground level. Evergreen trees shall be installed a maximum of 15 feet on center with a minimum height of six to eight feet. Landscape material shall be located to provide maximum buffering to vehicular areas while allowing visual access to buildings facades. 3. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected during construction with snow fencing placed at the drip line and maintained during construction. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4. Within the 25 foot setback along Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway a three foot average height continuous earth mound shall be installed and planted with one tree per 40 feet of frontage or fraction thereof. Provided however that this requirement will be abated due to the rise in Rings Road as it crosses I -270. The degree and point of abatement will be subject to resolution by the applicant and the Staff. 5. If a parking lot abuts a dedicated road or the north /south driveway then the one tree per 40 feet of frontage shall meet both the vehicular use area perimeter requirement as well as the street tree requirement. b. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed, or any portion retained to be developed in a future phase, shall be landscaped with a lawn at a minimum. 7. A minimum greenbelt of 25 feet shall be maintained between adjoining property line and any Parking area or structure except for the additional parking spaces in Subarea B and along the east and west sides of the proposed north/south driveway where the minimum green belt shall 10 feet. Required mounding can be placed in this area. 8. Site unity will be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade, evergreen, and ornamental trees) as in the adjoining Tuttle Crossing development. New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. _t. t All signage and graphics shall confrom to the Sign Code. 2. All signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks of the Code. 3. No sigh shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence. 4. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 5. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 6. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 7. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. 8. The size of the site, the freeway frontage, the obscuration of view from southbound I -270 and the fact that neither wall no ground signage on the freeway side of the site will be G 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TEXT one ground sign, each per the Sign Code, will be permitted facing I -270. Additionally, at the Rings Road access point one ground sign, six feet in height and with a maximum size of 50 square feet will be permitted and at the intersection of the building driveways with the proposed north/south driveway one ground sign, six feet in height and with a maximum size of 50 square feet will be permitted for each side of north/south driveway. The building sites east of the proposed north/south driveway will have signage along Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway as permitted by the Dublin Sign Code. Lighting Except as otherwise stated herein: 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff fixtures. 2. All types of parking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. 3. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood or dark brown, black, or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. 5. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. 7. All building illuminations shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 9. Landscape lighting along Rings Road or Paul Blazer Parkway shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted, except in areas where such are require by ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) or federal regulations. 5/9/97 7 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road ll � 11 t 1{ 4 e +s A�,Mt.+ 9°w°``a+��xr°ia rrna pao•rr• .�-� C a aorua+a"ln�� .s _ ]IT'aL�1M1[Y�aK7[t T111t4' - (Q - LV i DUKE REALTY INVESTMENTS fiINCS ROAD OFFICC BUILDING �y p M=Ma. Moae more /90 ■OMIMn (MIM05 MOaC rMUrRMM 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Preliminary and Final Plan Development Text 20.162 Acre Tract on the South Side of Rings Road Between I -270 and Paul Blazer Parkway A) SCHEMATIC PLAN, ETC. The site is an irregular rectangle totaling 29.355 acres. The I -270 frontage is about 600 feet; Paul Blazer Parkway frontage is about 700 feet and the depth along Rings Road is about 1500 feet. The site is essentially flat with a gentle slope to the east with an existing landscape business and single family house on the eastern portion of the site. The site is of a shape that will permit efficient development with an infinite number of variations. With the exception of the portion located within the elevated roadway for the Rings Road right -of -way there are no known physical factors that interfere with full use of the site. The primary attributes of the site are its I -270 freeway frontage and a location near to the Tuttle Crossing interchange. It can be anticipated that the ultimate user of this site will seek to exploit this exposure, probably with freeway- oriented office or corporate office uses such as are located to the north, south, and to the west, across I -270. Theses uses may include, but are not limited to, general office uses, corporate headquarters office, hotels /motels and major institutional uses. The site has significant frontage on Paul Blazer Parkway which would permit non - freeway oriented buildings. B) PROVISION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER, ETC. Water service will be accessed from the 20 inch water line that is located in the Rings Road right -of -way, on the south side of the street. 2. Sanitary sewer service will be accessed from the 21 inch trunk line located along nortl. side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. 3. Surface drainage is to be determined. The Cramer Ditch, a major drainage outlet, is located along the north side of Rings Road, to the north of the site. C) TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, ETC. The site has frontage on, and access to, Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway. Due to the elevation of the Rings Road bridge over I -270, cuts will be restricted on the western portion of the site. The "ramp" for the Rings Road /I -270 bridge is long and has excellent visibility. D) PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF SITE DEVELOPMENT, ETC. The first phase of construction of a 310,000 square foot office building is expected to begin in the spring of 1997. It is anticipated that is the freeway oriented portion of the site develops with a single user there will be a single phase of construction. If more than one user is involved it is anticipated that a single phase for each user will occur. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT E) RELATIONSHIP TO EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN SURROUNDING AREA, ETC. To the greatest degree possible, this text seeks to make this site subject to the same goals, restrictions, and quality assurances as the Tuttle Crossing development to the south and across I- 270 to the west. The development standards of Tuttle Crossing Subarea A area largely carried over into this text. The goal is to encourage development of this site as a visually integral part of the Tuttle Crossing development and be complimentary to the Ashland corporate park to the north. F) EVIDENCE OF CONTROL, ETC. All affected properties are now in the control of one developer. G) DEED RESTRICTIONS user(s). Deed restrictions, if any, will be filed at the time of conveyance of the property to end H) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEXT If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances then the Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commercial District. The proposed development will compliment the adjacent uses within the Tuttle Crossing Development. The Subarea Development Standards are as follows: Subareas The development plan for the subject property creates two subareas. Subarea A consists of 29.027 acres which contains the proposed 310,000 square foot office building along with ground for future development. Subarea B consists of .328 acres located on the southern portion of the site and will be used for landscaping and parking for the Atrium building as part of the revision to the driveway layout between the Atrium and BMW buildings. General It is the intent of the developer to create a unified, high quality office park development. 2. Mid -rise, signature type offices with parking structures will be promoted along freeway frontage. 3. Building elevations, plans and materials will be submitted for approval as part of the Development Plan in order to ensure that the quality standards required by this text have been met. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4. The same palette of landscaping materials will be utilized in a similar design manner as in the Tuttle Crossing development to ensure a coordinated landscaping treatment. Proposed developments will be focused around major water features. Wells will be used in some cases to control levels. All site planning will be done in a manner consistent with prudent planning principles and practices. Permitted Uses The following uses are permitted in Subarea A: Those uses listed in Dublin Code 153.026 (SO, Suburban Office and Institutional) and 153.034 (OLR, Office, Laboratory and Research) 2. Corporate offices 3. Hotel and motel 4. Institutional uses 5. Ancillary commercial or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or hotel uses The following uses are permitted in Subarea B: Parking 2. Landscaping Permitted Density The overall site will be developed with a maximum building area computed on the basis of acreage, exclusive of right -of -way with a maximum overall density of 17,000 square feet per acre. Yard and Setback Requirements Setback along I -270 shall be 50 feet for all parking areas and 75 feet for buildings. 2. Side yards shall be 25 feet from pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for pavement. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Rear yards shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings except for the proposed north/south driveway which shall have a 15 foot setback for pavement and for the parking areas in Subarea B which shall have a 10 foot setback for pavement. 4. All other publicly dedicated streets shall have a 25 foot pavement setback and a 50 foot building setback. Setback along Paul Blazer Parkway shall be 25 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25 percent of the total area. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 70 percent of the total lot area. 7. Setback from the proposed north/south driveway shall be 15 feet for all parking areas and 50 feet for buildings. Height Requirements The maximum height for structure shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 100 feet. The maximum height may be extended if the structure is set back from both I -270 and Rings Road rights -of -way and an additional two feet beyond the required setback for every one foot of height above the 100 foot maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures. Parking and Loading 1. Sizes, ratio, and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code, Chapter 153. 2. Bank drive -thru uses subject to conditional use provisions of Dublin Code 153.026. 3. All loading docks shall be screened according to Dublin Code, Chapter 153. Circulation All accesses shall be as approved by the City Engineer. At least one full service cut shall be permitted on both Paul Blazer Parkway and Rings Road, in an appropriate location. 2. Final location and design of all accesses to be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 3. A turn lane will be provided on Rings Road if it is needed, as determined by the City Engineer. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Waste and Refuse All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping All landscaping shall be according to Dublin Landscape Code. 2. A continuous landscape treatment shall be provided along the I -270 frontage containing a six foot mound or evergreen hedge /planting. Trees shall be placed in a manner that provides a 50 percent visual opacity throughout the year. This shall be achieved by providing a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees. The deciduous trees shall be planted a minimum of 30 feet on center with a minimum installation size of 2.5 inches caliper measured at a height of 12 inches above ground level. Evergreen trees shall be installed a maximum of 15 feet on center with a minimum height of six to eight feet. Landscape material shall be located to provide maximum buffering to vehicular areas while allowing visual access to building facades. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected during construction with snow fencing placed at the drip line and maintained during construction. 4. Within the 25 foot setback along Rings Road and Paul Blazer Parkway a three foot average height continuous earth mound shall be installed and planted with one tree per 40 feet of frontage or fraction thereof. Provided however that this requirement will be abated due to the rise in Rings Road as it crosses I -270. The degree and point of abatement will be subject to resolution by the applicant and the Staff. If a parking lot abuts a dedicated road or the north/south driveway then the one tree per 40 feet of frontage shall meet the vehicular use area perimeter requirement as well as street requirement as well as the street tree requirement. 6. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed, or any portion retained to be developed in a future phase, shall be landscaped with a lawn at a minimum. 7. A minimum greenbelt of 25 feet shall be maintained between adjoining property line and any parking area or structure except for the additional parking spaces in Subarea B and 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT along the east and west sides of the proposed north/south driveway where the minimum green belt shall be 10 feet. Required mounding can be placed in this area. 8. Site unity will be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade, evergreen, and ornamental trees) as in the adjoining Tuttle Crossing development. New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. 9. Each ground sigg (4 total) will be landscaped according to the submitted plans (see attached plan 1 thru 4) for the type of planting and its location around each individual sign. Signage and Graphics 1. All signage and graphics shall conform to the Sign Code unless modified by this text. 2. All signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks of the Code. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 4. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 5. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 6. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. 7. The size of the site, the freeway frontage, the obscuration of view from southbound I -270 and the fact that neither wall or ground signage on the freeway side of the site will be visible at the access point on Rings Road create special signage needs for the site. One (2 wall and one ground signsi s, each p°Lfhe Si gn Code, wWIg!aling 300 sq ft. shall be permitted facing I -270: (one on the 5455 Geder building and one on the 5475_ building-see number 9 and 10 on the site plan). Additionally one 6 foot high ground si with a maximum of 80 N. ft. will be allowed at the intersection of Rings Road and Atrium parkway, one 6 foot high-ground sign with a maximum of 50 sq. ft. will be allowed at the right in/ right out access point off Rings Road (see number 4 on the site lap ), one 8' foot high gound sign with a maximum size of 104 s . ft. will be allowed at intersection of Atrium Parkway and the southern access drive see number 2 on the site plan), one 6 foot high ground sign with a maximum size of 50 sg. ft. shall be allowed at the main en into the site see number 3 on site lap one set of address labels Re r building (both 5455 and 5475), each being 18 sq. ft. in size and located a maximum of 30' high on the east facade of the buildings (see number 5 and 6 on the site plan) and finall one set of address numerals per building both 5455 and 5475 18 sq. f1. in s ize and located a maximum of 30' hiWi on the west side fa ade of the building see numbers 7 and 8 on the site plan). AdditioneAly, at4he Rings d aecess t.v' .. one gFound aib. +, ai* ivwa in height cuza vr - rih 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT WON I r • r . r r Lightin Except as otherwise state herein: 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff fixtures. 2. All types of parking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be from the same type and style. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood or dark brown, black, or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. 5. Cutoff type landscape and building up lighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. 7. All building illuminations shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 9. Landscape lighting along Rings Road or Paul Blazer Parkway shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. Fence /Walls No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted, except in areas where such are required by ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) or federal regulations. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT duke - if" 5/24/11 F:Docs /s &htexts /2011 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road CITY OF DUBLIN N*w of Plate 5800 Shie -Rigs Road Dubin, Ohio 43016 -1236 M w"D: 614 - 761 -6550 Fax: 614-761-6566 Web Site: www.duMnAus DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION August 20, 1998 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Revised Development Plan 98- 072RDP - Chakeres, et al. Plan - Atrium II Parking Expansion - 5455 and 5475 Rings Road Location: 20.403 acres located on the south east corner of Rings Road and I -270. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres, et al. Plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development plan under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: An expansion to the parking lot of 102 spaces for an office development of 300,000 plus square feet. Applicant: Mark Gialluca, Duke Realty Limited Partnership, 4700 Lakehurst Court, Suite 150, Dublin, Ohio 43016. MOTION: To approve this revised development plan with the following 28 conditions: 1) That existing trees native to the site and removed as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be replaced with trees of similar caliper; 2) That existing trees relocated as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be carefully handled and stored or replaced by new nursery stock; 3) That any outstanding landscape issues from the first phase of the Atrium II project be resolved by October 15, 1998 or prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the second phase, whichever comes first; 4) That an 18 -inch high dry laid stone wall, similar to the one along the eastern side of the pond, be constructed between the realigned drive and the edge of the pond, subject to staff approval; 5) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks; 6) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director;* Page 1 of 3 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Page 2 of 3 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION August 20, 1998 1. Revised Development Plan 98 -072RDP - Chakeres, et al. Plan - Atrium II Parking Expansion - 5455 and 5475 Rings Road (Continued) 7) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 8) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 9) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 10) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, with phase one of the office development, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 11) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 12) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 13) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 14) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval; 15) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 16) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 17) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 18) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 19) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 20) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 21) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 22) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 23) That revised landscape, site dimension, and grading plans, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit; 24) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton- Aschman traffic study dated April 16, 1997; 25) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; Page 2 of 3 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION August 20, 1998 1. Revised Development Plan 98 -072RDP - Chakeres, et al. Plan - Atrium II Parking Expansion - 5455 and 5475 Rings Road (Continued) 26) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved; 27) That additional deciduous trees and landscaping be planted in the greenspace (triangular - shaped) landscaped area, subject to staff approval; and 28) That applicant provide a new legal description within two weeks. * Mark Gialluca agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This revised development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION r Kim C. Littleton Planner Page 3 of 3 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 2 1. Revised Development Plan 98 -072RDP - Chakeres, et al. Plan - Atrium II Parking Expansion - 5455 and 5475 Rings Road Kim Littleton presented this revised development plan for a parking lot expansion, relocation of landscaping and the north/south roadway. This will create 120 parking new spaces. The site will be expanded to meet the lot coverage standards. Mr. Littleton showed slides. The 20 -acre site is on the south side of Rings Road. Rings Road will be widened to four lanes with a median. The eastern side of the site contains a wet pond, while the parking lot is on the west side. Mr. Littleton said this site was expanded to include a portion of the retention area and the relocation of the north /south road. The dry basin will be decreased in size. Trees on the alignment of the north /south roadway will need to be carefully relocated or replaced. The primary concern of staff is the loss of greenspace. Additional landscaping should be planted and a barrier edge provided, perhaps using a concrete or stone wall. Mr. Littleton said staff recommends approval with 26 conditions, many being carried forward: 1) That existing trees native to the site and removed as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be replaced with trees of similar caliper; 2) That existing trees relocated as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be carefully handled and stored or replaced by new nursery stock; 3) That any outstanding landscape issues from the first phase of the Atrium II project be resolved by October 15, 1998 or prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the second phase, whichever comes first, 4) That a stone wall, similar to the one along the eastern side of the pond, be constructed between the realigned drive and the edge of the pond; 5) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks; 6) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 2) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 8) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 9) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit, 10) That temporary left tum stacking on Rings Road be provided, with phase one of the office development, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 11) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer, 12) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 13) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code, 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 3 14) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval, } 15) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 16) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines, 17) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer, 18) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff ` approval; 19) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 20) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 21) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 22) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 23) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit, 24) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton Aschman traffic study dated April 16, 1997; 25) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant, and 26) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved. * Italicized conditions adopted by the Commission on October 16, 1997 meeting for the Balgriffin final development plan. Mr Littleton said the applicant is providing either screening or landscape edging along the roadway. He said the applicant will present renderings of it. Mr. Eastep asked if stormwater retention will be adequate after reducing the pond size. Mr. Littleton said the dry detention pond was being reduced, but it was intended that it would be part of the system with the parking lot and the wet pond which remains. Mr. McCash asked if any conditions from previous approvals are still unresolved. Mr. Littleton said the only unresolved issues are those relating to the existing landscape plan and the type of plantings around the existing pond of the Atrium I project. The applicant is aware of the improvements needed. Mr. Fishman was very concerned about the elimination of greenspace. Mr. Littleton said the parking adjacent to the north/south road previously had a deeper setback. Staff feels it is important to enhance the landscaping since some of the green area had been reduced. The pond also needs a wall to provide a discreet edge. Mr. Fishman asked the poned could be wet. Mr. Littleton said it was designed as a dry pond connected to the wet pond because the area has vegetation which would be destroyed by a wet pond. Mr. Littleton said some trees will be lost. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 4 Mr. Lecklider asked if the landscaping which was out of Code compliance has been pointed out to the applicant. Mr. Littleton said they were notified. He said the roadway is not designed for through traffic, and the turning radius is satisfactory. Mark Gialluca, Duke Realty, said Nationwide Insurance (the major tenant) has asked for more parking. There is enough parking for the tenants now, but future expansion by the tenant will require more parking. Duke wants the opportunity to expand parking if the need arises. He said the driveway reviewed by the Engineering Department is designed to current subdivision standards. Mr. Gialluca said Duke agreed with the conditions, with the exception of the stone wall in Condition 4. They prefer using landscaping, or softer materials that will not block the view of the pond. There will still be approximately 60 feet of green space. They considered making this a wet basin, but ongoing maintenance was a concern. Their engineer felt it was impossible to make it wet full time. Tom McCash had a concern on the setback between the realigned road and the new parking. Mr. Gialluca said that the only way to increase this is to bend the road further to the east, increasing the curve. It became too cumbersome. Mr. McCash suggested that if it where more of an internal circulation road, that portion of the parking could have a pod configuration. It would internalize the loop. Mr. Gialluca said their proposal is the most efficient way to meet the tenant's parking request. Mr. McCash asked if the stone wall will protect against vehicles going into the pond. Mr. Littleton said the stone wall is more of a visual deterrent than a real one, but it could be a reinforced wall if desired. Mr. McCash said because of the curve, a stone wall or guard rail should be installed for protection. Mr. Littleton said the guardrail appearance would not fit with the area. Mr. Gialucca said the speed limit there was 15 mph. Mr. Fishman said that it would be unlikely for a driver to lose control of a vehicle traveling at 15 mph and therefore, he could not support the use of a protective guardrail. Mr. Fishman asked how much landscaping is needed to offset the loss of greenspace. Mr. Littleton said the existing landscape plan shows landscaping in that area, and the plan presented tonight would provide additional landscaping, including replacement trees. However, it does not show the additional stone wall. Additional landscaping would screen the parking lots and would help compensate for the reduced open space. The rezoning plan for this site does not require the open space along the edge of the internal roadway. The plan exceeds the minimum landscaping requirements. Mr. Fishman asked if a reinforced wall looked the same as one without reinforcement. Mr. Littleton said they are different in size. Mr. Gialluca said one possibility would be to use dry laid stone columns with two -foot shrubs planted between them. Evergreen junipers are quick - growing plants. Mr. Fishman wanted to replace the green space and hide the parking. Mr. Sprague said stone walls are "hallmark" features of Dublin. He does not believe a wall would be a safety hazard. Mr. Gialluca said that the road will not be closer to the pond after this expansion. Mr. Gialluca said there are three to four -foot walls on the east or back side of the pond. Ms. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 5 Newcomb verified that the wall on the east is 42 inches high and the one on the south is 30 inches high. Mr. Gialluca said Nationwide Insurance has occupied both phases of Atrium I. They may be increasing staff size and want more parking. Mr. Peplow asked if they were currently experiencing problems in the other building. Mr. Gialluca said at times, there is a perception that there is a problem with parking. A tenant may perceive a greater need for parking than what is real. Roger Eastep said 120 parking spaces are being added, but only one catch basin. He suggested regrading the site, building a tiered landscape area, and adding a catch basin in the parking lot. He suggested using a positive elevation of four feet, instead of a negative one. This could provide the same amount of detention before the water moves to the wet basin. Mr. Gialluca said the parking lot cannot be used to replace the dry basin. The depth of stormwater in the parking lot should be limited to six inches. Mr. Eastep said it may cost a bit more, but could be done. He wanted the greenspace maximized. Mr. Eastep said that the stone wall is for aesthetic reasons, and he would accept an 18 -inch stone wall that matches the existing walls. Mr. Littleton said the wall would give a visual edge to the 60 -foot long pond. He thought pillars with hedges would create a weaker edge than a wall and would not continue the design theme of the site. Mr. Littleton did not think a wall several feet high would distract from the water feature. Mr. Lecklider asked if Mr. Eastep's suggested stormwater plan would create more greenspace. Mr. Eastep said a dry pond is a flat surface, while the cross section of a mound provides planting areas and visual interest. Only plants that can tolerate wet roots can be used around a pond. Mr. McCash said this suggestion would require substantial regrading of the parking areas to get the detention to work. Mr. Eastep asked if the entire freeboard area would be utilized. There is an outlet in the northeast corner. Mr. Gialluca said their engineers have studied this in detail. The dry basin also acts as a filter for the stormwater. Ms. Fierce noted the property line is being moved slightly to the east. A new legal description is being requested to satisfy the needs of the TIF (Tax Increment Finance district). Mr. Eastep favored a low stone wall, perhaps 18 inches high, designed to match the other walls. The water feature will be visible over the wall. He said it is not a guardrail. Shrubs would ultimately obstruct the visibility. Mr. Peplow and Mr. Sprague agreed. Mr. McCash thought that a combination of hedges and piers would introduce an inconsistent element. He also supported the stone wall. Ms. Newcomb said the plan exceeds the Code, but a few trees could be added in the triangular area. Mr. Lecklider also supported installation of a low stone wall. He wanted assurance that landscaping will also be included, especially since some greenspace is being lost. Mr. Fishman made a motion for development plan approval with 28 conditions: 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 6 1) That existing trees native to the site and removed as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be replaced with trees of similar caliper; 2) That existing trees relocated as part of the parking lot expansion and driveway realignment be carefully handled and stored or replaced by new nursery stock; 3) That any outstanding landscape issues from the first phase of the Atrium II project be resolved by October 15, 1998 or prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the second phase, whichever comes first; 4) That an 18 -inch high dry laid stone wall, similar to the one along the,eastern side of the pond, be constructed between the realigned drive and the edge of the pond, subject to staff approval; 5) That revised landscape, site dimension, and grading plans reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks; 6) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 7) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 8) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 9) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 10) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, with phase one of the office development, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 11) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 12) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 13) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 14) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval; 15) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 16) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 17) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 18) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 19) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 20) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 21) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 22) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 23) That revised landscape, site dimension, and grading plans, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit; 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 7 24) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study dated April 16, 1997; 25) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 26) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved; 27) That additional deciduous trees and landscaping be planted in the greenspace (triangular - shaped) landscaped area, subject to staff approval; and 28) That applicant provide a new legal description within two weeks. Mr. Gialluca accepted the conditions and said the stone wall details can be worked out with staff. Mr. Sprague seconded, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) 2. Revilsed r Development Plan -079RFDP - Balgri PUD - The Cros5ixWs at Avery Road John T entino presented this vised final developm t plan for a portion the multi - family are . He said 162 ap is were approved o 5 acres, and five o e buildings contain wnhouses. The dev oper experienced soi problems in constru g the first townho e building. He said th UD text requires bas ents for the townho nits, and requests a iver of this require t for the four rema' g townhouse buildin . He said no other c ges are proposed an e proceeded to show venal slides of the ar Mr T entino stated the C ission has discreti to override the PI text if the final de apment plan is refle ve of the original zo ' g plan. Staff recd nds approval with 1 onditions, some of w 'ch are carried forwar om previous approv s: 1) That the trey nt along the edge of pond be designed a satisfaction of staf , 2) That a pi hich incorporates all the changes requir a submitted within o weeks; 3) That pr ective fencing be insta at least 15 feet from a trunks of all trees t e preserved pri to and during all ph s of construction wit eld verification by st ; 4) at handicap accessib parking spaces be ignated on the plan nd meet applicable design and location quirements, subject t tafj" approval; X5 That all signage net Code, be architectu ly integrated with th roject, and be accep le to staff, 6) That the r uired landscape btc}j` be shown on the site lan, and that the la cape plan meet C e and be acceptable staff; 7) Th a site lighting plan sting the text and D n Lighting Guideline a submitted and e acceptable to staff,• / That any proposal r a basketball court t e located within the blic park meet all C' y specifications at Code requirements, be subject to, f urthe eview by staff; 9) That all sta requirements be met n design of public ro s, private drives, p is and j private � roes, and storm water nagement; and 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 1 Meeting Held June 2, 1997 _ 19— Mayor Kra uber called the meeting to or at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Can )ell led the Pledge of Alle ' nee. 2 all ouncil members present � e. Mayor Kranstuber, Mrs. illwell, Mr, Campbell, Mr ci Ms. Hide Pittaluga and r. Reiner. Mrs. Boring arri d at 7:10 p.m. Staff members prese included: Mr. Hansley, Mr. elwig, Mr. Smith, Ms. Gri y, Mr. Harding, Ms. Cla e, Mr. Kindra, Mr. McDani , Chief Geis, Mr. Lenz, Ms Barden, Ms. C r andall, and r. Hahn. h, Mayor anstuber noted that this Sp al Meeting is being held to ansider legislation sche ed for hearing at the May Council meeting where th was a problem with agenda p ica tion. . There were no common rom visitors. LEGISLATION Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinances Ordinance No. 40- 97(Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 29.35 Acres of Land Located on the Southwest Corner of Rings Road and Paul Blazer Memorial Parkway from: R -1A, Restricted Suburban Residential District and PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Pagura and Helmbright Properties) (Applicant: Jeff Brown, Smith & Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215) There were no registered proponents or opponents to this rezoning. Ms. Clarke stated that the title of the ordinance has been amended as a portion of the land is already zoned Planned Commerce District. This ordinance expands the amount of property covered under the same text. The property includes 29 acres located on the south side of Rings Road between Blazer Parkway and I -270. The standards which were applied for the Tuttle Crossing text will now be applied to this larger piece of property. Two office buildings connected by an atrium are proposed for construction on this site. This represents an opportunity to have more consistent standards across the 140 acre site. The Planning Commission recommended approval on April 10, 1997 with a vote of 7 -0. The four conditions appended are: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the City; 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations; and 4) That entryway street lighting be consistent with City policy. Staff is recommending approval with the four conditions. Mrs. Stillwell noted that an amendment is needed to the title to correct it from "northwest corner of Rings" to "southwest ". Ben Hale, Smith & Hale. 37 W Broad St , representing the applicant stated that this action will subject all of the property to one zoning classification and one set of standards. It will therefore be much easier to administer. The applicant is requesting approval at this time. Mrs. Stillwell moved to amend the title to "southwest" corner and to amend the zoning category from R -lA and PCD to PCD. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. NlcCash, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Mrs. Stillwell moved approval of the ordinance with the conditions of Planning & Zoning Comtission. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin Citv Council Pag 2 Meeting June 2, 1997 19 Vote on the motion - Mr Reiner, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. Ordinance P6. 41 -97 - An Ordin�ttte roviding for a Chang n Zoning for 14.78 Act- of Land Cated at the Southeast arner of Perimeter Loo Road and Perimeter i) rve fro m: , Planned Commerc istrict to: PCD, Plarmliod Commerce District. / 'rle, esterrt Auto Group) ( plicant: Chris Cline, 3 Bridge Street repre rating Aeh, Midwestern uto Group, 5016 Post ad, Dublin, Ohio 4301 red as a proponen f the rezoning was Chri • line. There were no re i tered opponents to the rezon' g. Ms. Clarke stated th Midwestern Auto Grou s looking to triple the si of their existing facilities on Post ad and relocate to the P meter area between Per' eler Drive and Perimeter Loo The site consists of near 15 acres and the buildi proposed is very unusual and tailored this user. The site as pr eatly zoned under the P meter Center plan permi constructs of office and OLR uses iotels and multi -story b ings. The proposed pla creates new subarea within the P rimeter Center text plan ubarea "T'. The propo user is an to dealer and the buildi . plan is exotic, with a sp talized landscape plan, a unusual si age. The building featur three glass showrooms at face the southwest of e site. The arking has been divided i o several areas. The rezoning was appr ed by Planning Commis • in on April 10, 1997 wit conditions' 1) That the text e revised to provide clar' cation as to visual sale gi i cks, landscaping, lighting, auto lisp , grading, and building chitecture; 2) That ac ss to Perimeter Drive be rohibited; 3) That ore acceptable sign pa age be submitted as part this rezoning and incorparat in the text, 4) at design for all storm ter management, site util' es and improvements in ding gradi meet the approval of t City Engineer; 5) That construction be nked to approval of the liminary plat for "Wall" freer, and That an appropria subarea plan be submitte .. Ms Clarke conunen d that the grading, lightin and architecture for this an are very unusual and it does not co orm to Code in a variety ways. However, staff d Planning Commission h supported the applicatio because of the creative proach to this site whit will house a uto dealer. In terms the signage, Ms. Clarke plained that because the ' e has frontage on four Bets - US 3 erimeter Loop, Perimet Drive and Venture Driv , they are permitted to h e four sign What has been proposed re two signs 18 feet in h ' ht and 50 square feet h, a not ye dentified wall sign, and identification sign at the nuance on Venture Driv , Dublin's ode does not permit sig ge over 15 feet and does of permit a combination wall signs and ground signs. In response to Mr, ein/nto Clarke stated tat there are other areas here this application does not meet 17 lira's 6 -foot hi screen is required along a perimeter of property along freewa rontage ited acc freeways. This site do not have 6 -foot high screening e noted, h, that e Code specifically pe s an auto dealership to 1, .c a certain p rcentage of thge be used as a display are , and this site does not ex °ed that p tentage. They h n to do the display in an ypical fashion. Th ighting on the site ddressed by the Dublin li ting guidelines which ca for 96nsistency across the ee The application as roposed is for accent ligh " ig on display cars and up- lighting on of display cars. Ms. Hide Pittaluga oted that the plan is very steful, but wondered abo the effect the variances all in terms of signage, gra ' g and lighting would hav n future rezoning requests. Ms. Clarke hat a variance froc e 6 foot screening requir ent in front of buildin along 33 nd I -270 has been grant to several applicants prey` usly, including AirTvue , th 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Thot Kohler rezoning, Cardii Health and the Tuttle 11 ilding. The type of lig ng Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road 1:1'1'1 111' 111 lil'iN 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, OH 43011.1236 Phone/TDO: 614/161.6550 Fax: 614/761 -6506 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COM USSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 5. Revised Development Plan 97 -039DP - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road, The Atrium at Tuttle Crossing (Nationwide Insurance) - 5525 Parkcenter Circle, and Pagura Property - 5255 Rings Road Location: 41.54 acres located on the south side of Rings Road to the east of I -270, and extending south to Parkcenter Circle. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres /Wheatley /Puckett Plan), PCD, Planned Commerce District (Tuttle Crossing Plan), and R -lA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (PCD application pending, 97 -038Z Pagura Plan). Request: Review and approval of several revised development plans, under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: Proposed office development, including a 309,350 square foot, five -story office building, a new north /south access road and circulation and parking modifications to existing office sites. Applicants: Jeff Brown, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; Mark Gialluca, Duke Construction, 4700 Lakehurst Court, Suite 150, Dublin, Ohio 43016; Stephen and Denise Pagura, 5261 Rings Road, Dublin, Ohio 43016; Tuttle Road Limited Partnership, c/o Multi -Con Builders, 500 South Front Street, Suite 770, Columbus, Ohio 43215; and Huntington Trust Company and Bank One Trust Company, Co- Trustees, Real Estate Division, 235 West Schrock Road, Westerville, Ohio 43081. MOTION: To approve the Rings Road Office Building revised development plan because it will improve traffic management, further the economic development goals of the Mount Auburn Study, add to Tuttle Crossing office park, and provide coordination among parcels, with 21 conditions: 1) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 2) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 3) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; Page 1 of 4 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 5. Revised Development Plan 97 -039DP - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road, The Atrium at Tuttle Crossing (Nationwide Insurance) - 5525 Parkcenter Circle, and Pagura Property - 5255 Rings Road (Continued) 4) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, with phase one of the office development, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 6) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 8) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 9) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 12) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit; 19) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton- Aschman traffic study dated April 16, 1997; 20) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; and 21) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved. Page 2 of 4 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CONMUSSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 5. Revised Development Plan 97 -039DP - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road, The Atrium at Tuttle Crossing (Nationwide Insurance) - 5525 Parkcenter Circle, and Pagura Property - 5255 Rings Road (Continued) The motion included approval of The Atrium At Tuttle Crossing revised development plan because it will improve traffic circulation, further the economic development goals of the Mount Auburn Study, and is consistent with the Community Plan, with 12 conditions: 1) That the site be landscaped to preserve openspace and break up parking areas, in accordance with the Development Text and Code; 2) That the landscape plan comply with Code, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That all mechanical units including rooftop units, cooling tower(s), transformers, dumpsters, and utility meters be screened to Code; 4) That the east edge of the parking lot be screened per Code within 36 months of occupancy unless the adjacent site is developed; 5) That stormwater meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 6) That lighting conform to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 7) That a tree preservation plan providing for protection of the northern treeline be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, subject to staff approval; 8) That a right -of -way permit be obtained from the Division of Engineering to abandon existing storm sewer lines and that the abandoned pipes be grouted; 9) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study, dated April 16, 1997; 10) That the treeline be maintained as required by City Council in connection with the utility waiver; 11) That the width of the driveway islands and the caliper of the trees (3.5 inches) meet the requirements of Subarea A2 of the Tuttle Crossing text, or that text modifications be approved by City Council; and 12) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. The motion also includes approval of the Pagura Site revised development plan because it will provide improved traffic circulation and an attractive water feature, with three conditions:. 1) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton- Aschman traffic study, dated April 16, 1997; 2) That the pond is designed to maximize its aesthetic characteristics, as approved by staff and installed with Phase 1 of the Rings Road Office Building; and Page 3 of 4 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMIVIISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 5. Revised Development Plan 97 -039DP - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road, The Atrium at Tuttle Crossing (Nationwide Insurance) - 5525 Parkcenter Circle, and Pagura Property - 5255 Rings Road (Continued) 3) That the east -west link is completed prior to occupancy of Phase 2, or the widening of Rings Road, whichever occurs first. * Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5 -0. RESULT: This revised development plan for the above sites was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Mary A. Newcomb Landscape Planner Page 4 of 4 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 199 Page 17 f 46 7) That sidewalk be cons;2�servation along the frontage the new road; 8) t the fencing for tree along the st property line be ti verified by the staff and be install along the drip line o e trees prior to and uring all phases of construction; That the finis floor elevation and-' e grading be coordi ed with the Justice C ter site; and 10) That all anges required above,bre"incorporated into a sed plan that is sub ' ed within two eeks. ,f Mr. P low seconded the mo ' n, and Mr. Apel agr to the amended con ' ions. The vote was as llows: Mr. Peplow, s; Ms. Chinnici -Zuer er, yes; Mr. Lecklider es; Mr. Sprague, ye , nd Mr. Harian, yes. ,[Approved 5 -0 with D elopment Text remo ) 5. Revised Development Plan - 97 -039DP - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road; Atrium at Tuttle Crossing (Nationwide Insurance) - 5525 Parkcenter Circle; and Pagura Property - 5255 Rings Road Mary Newcomb presented this revised development plan. The Rings Road Office Building development plan was approved by the Commission in January 1997. There have been several recent rezoning actions involving the Chakeres/Wheatley /Puckett site and the Chakeres, Wheatley, Puckett, Pagura, and Helmbright sites along the south side of Rings Road between I -270 and Blazer Parkway. This revised development plan for the Rings Road Office Building adds 14,500 square feet to the building. A traffic study was done for the area by Barton Aschman Associates in December 1996 as part of the original development plan. With the revised development plan that study was updated, as four items were identified as essential elements of the system: 1) One full access drive for the properties off Rings Road, at least 600 feet west of Blazer Parkway; 2) Reconfiguration of the curb cut and median break on Blazer Parkway to directly serve the northern parcels; 3) Construction of a continuous east/west drive from the new Blazer Parkway median break to the western parkway lots of development; and 4) Connection of the north /south drive to service the BMW parking lot with the new east/west drive (to replace the lost direct access point along Blazer Parkway). There is not a revision of the BMW site plan at this time. An existing fencerow separates the Atrium site and the Rings Road Office Building. An exception to the burial of a utility line was approved in 1990 with conditions that the existing fencerow be maintained to hide it. Ms. Newcomb said some of the trees are being removed as part of this proposal. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 18 Ms. Newcomb said a zero setback was created between the Atrium and BMW parking lots, and as a result, there are 18 -foot wide landscaping islands flanking the drive with 3.5 -inch caliper trees. The applicant is proposing five -foot and ten -foot wide islands in this area to recreate it, They are proposing three -inch caliper trees, but staff believes 3.5 inch caliper trees should be required. Parking is being added to offset the parking being lost. There is a 20- space, compact parking area being created with 56 additional parking spaces, creating a jog in the property line. Staff believes that the proposed changes to the development plans will result in a better transportation system for the large office complex under development. Staff recommends approval with several conditions. In order to maintain accurate records, the original conditions for each development plan have been repeated here. New conditions are in italics. Rings Road Office Building Revised Development Plan Conditions: 1) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 2) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 3) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 4) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building P g� g p g permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, as required by the City Engineer; 6) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 8) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 9) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 12) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 19 Aft 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit; 19) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study; 20) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; and 21) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved. The Atrium At Tuttle Crossing Revised Development Plan Conditions: 1) That the site be landscaped to preserve openspace and break up parking areas, in accordance with the Development Text and Code; 2) That the landscape plan comply with Code, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That all mechanical units including rooftop units, cooling tower(s), transformers, dumpsters, and utility meters be screened to Code; 4) That the east edge of the parking lot be screened per Code within 36 months of occupancy unless the adjacent site is developed; 5) That stormwater meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 6) That lighting conform to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 7) That a tree preservation plan providing for protection of the northern treeline be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, subject to staff approval; 8) That a right -of -way permit be obtained from the Division of Engineering to abandon existing storm sewer lines and that the abandoned pipes be grouted; 9) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study; 10) That the treeline be maintained as required by City Council in connection with the utility waiver; 11) That the width of the driveway islands and the caliper of the trees meet the requirements of Subarea A2 of the Tuttle Crossing text, or that text modifications be approved by City Council; and 12) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. PPagura Site Conditions: Conditions: 1) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study; 2) That the pond is designed to maximize its aesthetic characteristics, as approved by staff and installed with Phase 1 of the Rings Road Office Building; and 3) That the east -west link is completed prior to occupancy of Phase 2. L J 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 20 Randy Bowman suggested that the date of the Barton - Aschman study be added to the conditions. He suggested that for Condition 3 of the Pagura site, the following be added: "...or the widening of Rings Road, whichever occurs first ". Mr. Lecklider asked what existing water feature would be similar in size. Randy Bowman said the Borror Corporation pond was approximately one acre in size. Mr. Lecklider asked if the five -foot islands are wide enough. Ms. Newcomb said a seven -foot island is recommended. She said the red oaks may need to be substituted with medium -sized trees. Mr. Peplow asked if with the additional square footage would the density still comply with the text. Ms. Newcomb said yes. The permitted density is now 16,900 square feet per acre. Mr. Sprague asked if 3.5 -inch caliper trees were difficult to transplant. Ms. Newcomb said because of the zero setback, an immediate screening impact with larger trees was wanted. Ben W. Hale, the applicant, agreed with the above conditions for all three sites. He said if the TIF was approved and the road was constructed, the left turn lane required in Condition 5 for the Rings Road Office Building would be very short-term. He would like the condition amended. Randy Bowman suggested the following addition to the condition: "That temporary left turn Ask stacking on Rings Road be provided, with Phase 1 of the office development, unless otherwise IN addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant. (TIF agreement) ". Mr. Hale did not believe Condition 3 of the Pagura site was needed. Randy Bowman said it related to the actual construction of the Rings Road widening. When the City undertakes the construction of that widening all traffic will be shut down to Rings Road. Mr. Hale said the 1,300 parking spaces do not include the BMW site. Because of the north -south driveway, parking spaces will be lost and currently they have a shared parking agreement with Nationwide. Mr. Harian said this was a large building with many parking spaces. He suggested for future reference, he would like more green area or ponding in the project. Mr. Lecklider agreed. Mr. Harian made a motion for approval of the Rings Road Office Building revised development plan because it will improve traffic management, further the economic development goals of the Mount Auburn Study, add to Tuttle Crossing office park, and provide coordination among parcels, with 21 conditions: 1) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; dh 2) That the four lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; IV 3) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 21 4) That easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, with phase one of the office development, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; 6) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 8) That all signage for this site (including the development sign at the pond) comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 9) That landscaping comply with Code, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 12) That storm water management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit; 19) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study dated April 16, 1997; 20) That modifications to Blazer Parkway be provided by the applicant, unless otherwise addressed by executed agreement between the City and the applicant; and 21) That the expanded building be completely consistent with the materials, colors, architecture and detailing as originally approved. Mr. Harian's motion also included approval of The Atrium At Tuttle Crossing revised development plan because it will improve traffic circulation, further the economic development goals of the Mount Auburn Study, and is consistent with the Community Plan with 12 conditions: 1) That the site be landscaped to preserve openspace and break up parking areas, in accordance with the Development Text and Code; 2) That the landscape plan comply with Code, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That all mechanical units including rooftop units, cooling tower(s), transformers, dumpsters, and utility meters be screened to Code; 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 22 r - I • 4) That the east edge of the parking lot be screened per Code within 36 months of occupancy unless the adjacent site is developed; 5) That stormwater meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 6) That lighting conform to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 7) That a tree preservation plan providing for protection of the northern treeline be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit, subject to staff approval; 8) That a right -of -way permit be obtained from the Division of Engineering to abandon existing storm sewer lines and that the abandoned pipes be grouted; 9) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study, dated April 16, 1997; 10) That the treeline be maintained as required by City Council in connection with the utility waiver; 11) That the width of the driveway islands and the caliper of the trees (3.5 inches) meet the requirements of Subarea A2 of the Tuttle Crossing text, or that text modifications be approved by City Council; and 12) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. Mr. Harian's motion was also for approval of the Pagura Site revised development plan because it will provide improved traffic circulation and an attractive water feature, with three conditions:. 1) That the site comply with the recommendations of the Barton - Aschman traffic study, dated April 16, 1997; 2) That the pond is designed to maximize its aesthetic characteristics, as approved by staff and installed with Phase 1 of the Rings Road Office Building; and 3) That the east -west link is completed prior to occupancy of Phase 2, or the widening of Rings Road, whichever occurs first. Mr. Hale agreed to the above amended conditions. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Combined Vote: Approved 5 -0.) 5. evelopment Plan Ze 4DP - Perimeter nter Subarea J - M' extern Auto Grou 6425 Perimeter D Bo bbie Clarke s d the Commission rodde a positive Group (MAG ezoning April 10. Aefion on the develc plan will subject to any ;oni ons City Council E landsc ng, lighting, gradi, and signage. f on the Midwestern Auto (plan was tabled. TOe' development Most of the current issues deal with 11 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetin i Held April 14, 1997 Pape 10 lg f Ordinance No. 33 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 17.237 J Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Corner of Rings Road and I -270, from: PCD, Planned Commerce District, to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Chakeres/Wheatley/Puckett text revision) (Applicant: City of Dublin, Go Timothy Hansley, City Manager, 6665 Coffinan Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017) Ms. Clarke stated this was an application taken at the direction of the City Manager. A major building had already been approved under the development plan provisions of the " Planned Commerce District, and there were some questions as to whether the second phase could be approved without a rezoning. The Law Director determined that the zoning should be undertaken. There are no additional rights given or taken away with this action; the intent is to standardize two texts that exist and to provide a blended density across the property. As originally zoned, 14 acres along the freeway had an 18,000 square feet per acre maximum and 2 smaller properties totaling 5 acres were zoned for 14,000 square feet per acre. She then showed slides to Council of the site. In the near future, Council will review another rezoning application which takes this text and expands the area to cover everything from I -270 over to Blazer Parkway. This rezoning basically takes two separate rezonings - the Chakeres property and the Wheatley /Puckett property and provides a blended text for the two, It was initiated by the City Manager and there is nothing controversial associated with this proposal. Ben Hale repr'gsentiitg Dukc �y r±�vesements stated that they agree to the conditions recommended by Planning Commission. He requested that Council pass this by emergency if possible in order to move forward with the project. Council chose not to take emergency action on this rezoning matter since it is Council's policy not to waive the right of referendum for rezoning cases. Mrs. Stillwell called the question with the understanding that it includes the three conditions from Planning Commission Record of Action of March 20, 1997: 1 j That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the city; and 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations. Vote on the ordinance - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Ordinanc o. 42 -97 - An Ordinance pdate the Arterial '1'raf[i t;tn for the City o ublin to Improve Circula i n to the North and West o ie Sawmill/161 Int action. X S. Clarke stated that this is oroughfare amendment initi ed by staff. It was referred to the Planning Commissio and also to the Transportati ask Force with the stipuiat that the public hearing uld be held tonight. The Tr sportation Task Force did recommend approv ith one abstention. The Pl 'ng Commission reviewed t ' on Thursday, April and noted that they have n eceived a full traffic study o s; that the specific • nmcnt was very important i e decision and no alignmen tudy has been undertak and that the Commission h previously indicated that the ould like an overa Ian for the David Road are rior to taking this action. C sequently, the C mission chose not to make ecommendation at this time. toff has endorsed the mmendment as has the Trans nation Task Force, Mayor Kranstuber co ented that the minutes fro a Transportation Task Forc not detailed enau to help understand their tho t process in this recommen ion. Ms- Clark toted that in the normal cour an updated thoroughfare pl would be propos with the Community Plan update. But because there is a r onmg application acti in this area and in order to erve the option for a road ection, staff is commending this amendmen rior to the full adoption of t Community Plan, 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road CITY OF 1)[131.1\ 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, OH 43017.1236 Phone/TDD: 614/761 -6550 Fax: 614/761 -6506 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CONDMSION RECORD OF ACTION April 10, 1997 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 5. Rezoning Application 97 -038Z - Composite Plan - Helmbright and Pagura to Chakeres Properties Location: 29.35 acres located on the southeast comer of Rings Road and I -270. Existing Zoning: R -lA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (eastern 10 acres, Washington Township Zoning District) and PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres/ Wheatley /Puckett Plan). Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Proposed Use: Proposed office development. Applicant: Jeff Brown, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; and Mark Gialluca, 4700 Lakehurst Court, Suite 150, Dublin, Ohio 43016. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with the following conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the city; 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations; and 4) That entryway streetlighting be consistent with City policy. * Jeff Brown agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clark Planning Director 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 17 5. Rezoning Application 97 -038Z - Composite Plan - Hehnbright and Pagura to Chakeres Properties Bobbie Clarke said a City - sponsored rezoning (Wheatley /Puckett / Chakeres properties) was approved at the last meeting. This rezoning application is being filed by the developer to include all their properties (29 acres) from I -270 eastward to Blazer Parkway. She said staff is recommending approval of this rezoning application with three conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the city; and 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations. Ben W. Hale, Jr., attorney, agreed to the above conditions. However, he asked that the text on the bottom of page three regarding Subarea B be changed omitting "...for the adjacent Atrium Building" and replacing it with "...parking and landscaping ". Ms. Clarke had no objection. Ms. Boring asked if the developer is to build a left -turn lane. Ms. Clarke said the left turn lane will be financed by the TIF. Ms. Boring asked about the street lighting at the entry. Randy Bowman said lighting at the entry may be included in the TIF. The City would not construct the street lighting. Randy Bowman said a Condition 4 could be added saying "That street lighting at the entry, consistent with City policy, be installed by the developer along Rings Road ". Ms. Boring made the motion that this composite plan be approved with four conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the city; 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations; and 4) That entryway street lighting be consistent with City policy. Mr. Harian seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; and Ms. Boring, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) 6. Re?_V1 ' ed Development P n 97 -XRinad; s Road Office B ding - 5 The Atrium at a Crossing surance) - 25 Parkcenter Ci e; and Pagura Prope - 5255 Rings This applicatio was postponed witho ot intil the Ma 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION March 20, 1997 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, OH 43017.1236 Phone/TDD:614/761.6550 Fax: 614/761 -6506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Rezoning Application 97 -03OZ - Development Text Revision - Chakeres /Wheatley/ Puckett Plan Location: 17.237 acres located on the southeast corner of Rings Road and I -270. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres and Wheatley /Puckett Plans). Request: Review and approval of a revised development text revision under the provisions of Section 153.058, to combine the parcels for density calculation purposes. Proposed Use: A two - phase, 295,000 square foot, five -story office building. Applicant: City of Dublin, c/o Timothy Hansley, City Manager, 6665 Coffman Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this rezoning because it facilitates an approved development plan, facilitates proper zoning administration, and is consistent with the goals of the Mount Auburn study, with three conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the city; and 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the developer of the properties, stated he had no objection to this rezoning. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. The City Council hearing is being scheduled for April 14, 1997. STAFF CERTIFICATION �. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Barbara M. Clarke Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Planning Director Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 20, 1997 Page 9 Ms. Fierce said th ublin Exterior L hting Guidelines ed to be codified. The intention is to establish a m mum criteria for 1' sting beyond the b rc Code standards They establish lig uniformity, ight limits, light pass and glare trol criteria. Staf elieves that they ve been appl' consistently on mmercial and resi ntial sites in Dub ' In the immedi area are Hid , Dublin Comm e Park, and Cars which all confor to the Lighting G delines. � Peplow said the G delines were very g�implicated, and he ould not commen n this issue. Mr. Ferrara was di rbed to hear that l ere are numerous n- conforming sit Mr. Lecklider ed about th/noound left -turn lane n Wilcox Road to ie Shier -Rings Ro intersection ing a conditione said it wa of necessary to m it a condition be sc there was verbal commitin developer o do so. Mr. klider asked whawould be develop on Lots 1 and 10. r. Weil said it w uncertain at zis time, but the dire is for more of e same offices as pitted. Mr. Ferrara mad a motion to approv this rezoning becau it provi/anap iate transitional land use and i consiste nt with th outhwest Area Pl and area conditions: 1) That all ite plans confor o Code with respe to landscapige, signag nd parki , and meet the D in Lighting Guide 'nes; 2) Th lots are combined s necessary, so buil ngs and parking d h legs roperty yn�, reet trees b nstalled on both sid of Terry Lee Coin and on the south Shier -Rings d west de of Wilcox Roa , four- t sidewalk be ins d along both side f Terry Lee CQUr , and an eight -foot th installed south of ier -Rings Road a west to Wilcox R , d; * i the development o is #1, 2, 8, 9, 10, storm water etained on parkin ots a filtered before en ring Cosgray Ditc ,tar as approved b th e City Engineer and* ounding and a itional landscapin e planted along cox Road, acros rom the g residences st of'Wiicox Roa ,subject to Staff a raval. carri over from final p i Mr. Peplow s onded the motion d the vote was: r. Harian, yes; M . Lecklider, yes; Sprague, ye Ms. Chinnici -Zuer er, yes; Ms. Bori , yes; Mr. Peplo , yes; and Mr. Fe ara, yes. (Ap oved 7 -0.) 3. Rezoning Application 97 -03OZ - Development Text Revision - Chakeres /Wheatley/ Puckett PCD Plans Bobbie Clarke said two PCD rezonings were approved several years ago for a 14 -acre site located along I -270 and Rings Road (Chakeres) and two single - family lots, 2.5 acres each (Wheatley and Puckett). Both development texts are nearly identical to the Tuttle Crossing text. A development 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 20, 1997 Page 10 plan was approved for the Rings Road Office Building recently which spreads across the Chakeres, Wheatley, and Puckett property lines. The building itself is entirely on the Chakeres property. She said this is a City- sponsored rezoning, that attempts to "blend" the density permitted in the two zoning texts. A condition of development plan approval required a text amendment if the law director found it necessary. This is the amendment proposed. She said the blended density will be 17,000 square feet of building /acre. The current 14 -acre Chakeres PCD permits 18,000 square feet of building /acre. The Wheatley /Puckett five acres permit 14,000 square feet of building /acre. This yields a blended density of 17,000 square feet. Ms. Clarke said all the other requirements were standardized. The intent of this rezoning is to leave the property with the same rights and responsibilities. Ms. Clarke said in April a new rezoning application submitted by Duke will be heard that includes all of this property, plus the Helmbright and Pagura Landscape Company sites. She said staff is recommending approval of this rezoning with three Conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the City; and 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked why the City initiated this rezoning. Ms. Clarke said it was a matter of timing to deal with the immediate problem. Mr. Ferrara asked if any of the parcels were part of the tax abatement. Ms. Clarke said a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) area was approved for improvements to Rings Road. She said there was a community reinvestment area (tax abatement district) for the Tuttle Crossing land, but not this site. Tim Hansley said Council had discussed a non - school TIF to develop Rings Road. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing Duke, the future owner, consented to the rezoning. Mr. Ferrara made a motion for approval because it facilitates an approved development plan and zoning administration, and is consistent with the Mount Auburn goals, with three conditions: 1) That all previous agreements, commitments, and conditions applicable to the development of this property continue to apply; 2) That the right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (minimum 40 feet from centerline along Rings Road) be dedicated to the City; and 3) That a revised development plan be approved for any affected plan due to changes in traffic circulation, layout, or other considerations. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 20, 1997 Page 11 Ms. Boring seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) 4. Final De/elopment Plan 97 9FDP - Village ajAalgriffm Condogdniurns John T ntino presented thi mal development p for 56 townhouse ondominiums on 8 acres of 4 -acre Balgriffin A 65 -foot righ -way from center ' eon Avery Road, ikepath al �g Nom Street and e north side of Rin oad, a_ single acc s drive as recom ded by the ity Engineer, and estrian connecti to the apartments re being reviewed The exteriors are stucco ston and stucco. The /general architectur design is based n the Balgriffin apartments. T text requires same rash quality on all uilding sides, and ff requests revise elevations t effect this, especial on the rear elevati ns facing the street The landscaping p n needs ch ges to meet screen g and regarding th/species of shade tr sin the parking a s. T hi roposal has been ordinated with thg4djacent apartment nd meets the requ' ments of L preliminary deve pment plan. Staff commends approv with nine conditio s: } That rear buil ' g elevations be re sed to reflect the s e level of quality materials and detailing as ont elevations; 2) That rig -of -way for Avery oad which compl' s with the MS Co ultants Avery Ro Align nt Study be deed o the City prior to e issuance of a b 'ding permit; 3) Th right -of -way alon ings Road consis nt with the Thoro fare Plan (30 fe from c terline) be deeded the City prior to e issuance of a bui ing permit; 4) at an 8 -foot bike be provided with' the building setbac area on the north si e of Rings Road (within ement if necessary and on the west si of Nom Street, d a bikepath easement be vided along Nom treet, acceptable to taff; 5) That a five oot -wide pedestri path connect with e path from the B griffin Apartments Phase 2 d be acceptable t staff; 6) That revised landscape an that meets Co and incorporates e changes request tic sub fitted and be accep le to staff; 7) at all lighting me the requirements ( the development an text, and Dubliyf Lighting Guidelines; That all Fnginee 'ng Division requir ents be met on den of public roads,rprivate drives, public and l) r' ate utilities, and s mwater managem t; and 9) That a pla incorporating all o he changes requir above be submits to staff within tw weeks. 7 Mr. F entino said the siXrs on the northea corner of Avery oad and Rings Ro The pert Irian path from th ° apartments splits b weep two building / Ms. Boring said th ngineering Divisio stated firmly last nyAth that Dublin requires two access points >P fo multi - family sites, his proposal only as one, and it is i onsistent with the policy. She snot assess it props until it has a seco emergency access. of even emergen 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Diihlin city Cnrn Meeting P age g Meeting March 17, 1997 Ordinance No. 40 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 10.089 Acres of Land Located on the Southwest Corner of Rings Road and Paul Blazer Memorial Parkway from: R -IA, Restricted Suburban Residential District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Pagura and Belmbright Properties) (Applicant: Duke Realty c/o Jeff Brown, Smith & Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215) Mrs. Boring introduced the ordinance and moved referral to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Campbell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes. Ordinance N 41 -97 - An Ordinance viding for a Change i oning for 14.78 Acres of L d Located at the South st Corner of Perimeter oop Road and Perimet Drive front: 'CD, Pla ed Commerce District t .PCD, Planned Nlldweste Auto Group) (Applica . Midwestern Auto Grou Cam rce District. ( Ch es Aeh, 5016 Post Road ublin, OH 43017) McCash introduced th rdinance and moved ref al to the Planning and Z ng ommission. Mrs. Boring seconded emotion. s. Hide Pittaluga, yes; rs. Boring, yes; Mr. Mc sh, yes; Mr, Reiner, yes; Mr. ampbell, yes; Mayor Kr tuber, yes; Mrs. Stillwell es, Ordinance o. 42 -97 - An Ord' to Update the Arterial raffic Plan for the City of blin to Improve Circu ian to the North and W , At of Sawmill/161 Inter tion. Mr ampbell introduced the dinance. . Clarke noted that this i nt is scheduled on the week, following referral ` om Council. Mrs. Stillwell suggest this would be a nice op c Force to provide i t as well as the Plannin ) om are meeting con rrently next Thursday. Commission for the Transpo tion Task n. It is her unodistanding they Mr. Campbel oved to refer this to the arming and Zoning Co fission and to the Transport ' n Task Force for their r iew. Mrs. Sti ell seconded the motion Mr. ipbell amended his moti to include that the Tr portation Task Force an he PI ing Commission report ck to Council prior to tl time of second reading April 1997. Mrs. Stillwell seconded ( 6 c amended motion. Vote on the mot ion _ 4s. Boring, yes; Mr. Ca pbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pitt ga, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. ydwell, yes; Mayor Kran ber, yes; Mr. McCash, y Ordinance 4: 43 -91- An Ordinance Certain Sect`s of Ordinance 98- 96 ( "Com nsation Plan ") and A (h rizing Certain Wage /classification ents for Certai Job C! ifications Retroactive Mrs, illwell introduced the o dinance. r ansley explained that hen the union vote was pr usedtenance ew ,d,, and auto mechanic.�ositions were removed frgg the prS stu . Now that those positions h been removed from con `aeration in inin unit, staff is recommending that ouncil make adjustments the salary sc classification plan to allow the to be considered as mid- Wagers and outrgaining unit. Staff is askin,t at this beheld over fora coed reading and ring at the next Council me ang. There ill be a second reading at e April 14 Council meeting. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting Ordinauc 23 -97 - An Ordinanc uthorizing the City anager to Enter into Pfi Agree t of Mutual Aid wit he City of Columbus And Amending Orden ce No. 1 67. / Ma r Kranstuber introduc the ordinance. / Grigsby stated that s ff recommends holdinVhis over for a s/a,ked. . n response to Mrs. Bo ng, Chief Geis stated tKat all mutual aid re This ordinance mere updates the existing ordinance; it does not shange the ordinance in n ce since 1967. Mr. McCash rated that he has concert with response proved m non - emergency situations. a is concerned that the /afety of Dublin citizen will be compromised. Chief G6is responded that liabijify exposure . reduced 1th these types of agr ents in pl46e. Dublin also has thobility to say "no" to r ests for aid. In an en rgency situation, the decision to r9ifpond rests with the on- ty supervisor. /an - cinergency situation, the,,decision would rest wit the Chief of Polic assured Mr. McC�sh that Dublin Police w ld never jeopazdize of Dublin residents to commit Sublin's resources to ar/ther community. Mrs. Stillwell ggested a time period Pof specified for a notice intention to withdraw in Section 7/ rhaps 30 or 60 days. Mr. Smith esponded that he will c 'fy this prior to the n t reading. There w' be a second reading a public hearing on the rdinance at the March /Mayo meeting. ce 26/induced ' ance Accepting the west /Best Bid for P ting of ry, Ed Business Cards for a City of Dublin. ranstced the ordinance. ding nce there is a rea able an ticipation that a bid amount may go over $20,0tract is extend for a second or third staff prepared this legislation rises to the t eshold required for bi ing. There will b/a second reading and p lic hearing on the or ance at the March 3 Council mAting. OrdilAce 30 - An Or ee Providing for a C ange in Zoning for 2 .38 Acres of Land Located on a Southwest Corner Shier -Rings Road a d Wilcox ad, from: RI, Restric d Industrial District„ v: SO, Suburban Of a and nstitutional District. ilcox Place) (Applie t: Gordon F. Scherer to Luis G. Weil, Agent, P.O. B 370, Dublin, OH 4 I7) Mrs. Boring introd ed the ordinance and Dyed to refer it to Pl ing Commission. Mayor Kranstub seconded the motion. - Mr. Campbell, s; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, es; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kran tber, yes; Mrs. Stillw , yes; Mr. McCash, stain. Ordina a 31 -97 - An Ordina ce Providing for a Cb ge in Zoning for 11 .47 Acres f Land Located on t East Side of Cosgra oad, Approximatel "dway Bet een Shier -Rings Roa and Post Road, from- IP, Planned Indust I Park D' irict, to: PIP, PIann Industrial Park Dist ct. (Northwest Dub ommercial Park - S risOhio). (Applicant: llen S. Shepherd III, esident, Steele Land Company, 629 Cosgray Road, Dubli OH 43016) Mr. Campbell intr duced the ordinance move to refer it to PI ning Commission. Mrs. Boring s nded the motion. - Mrs. Stillwell, ; Mayor Kranstuber, ; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Hide P' taluga, yes; Mrs. Bori , yes; Mr. Campbell, s. ` 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Ordinance 33 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 17.237 Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Corner of Rings Road and I -270, from: Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of l 19 PCD, Planned Commerce District, to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Chakeres /Wheatley /Puckett text revision) (Applicant: City of Dublin, for the owners, c/o Barbara M. Clarke, 5800 Shier Rings Road, Dublin, OH 43016) Mrs. Stillwell introduced the ordinance and moved to refer it to Planning Commission. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance -5t7 - An Ordinance cthorizing the City M� ager to Enter into i Lease Ag entent with Time Wa er Enterprises Co., for a Communic' otss /ry stuber introduced a ordinance. y stated that Mr cDaniel has forw ard a memo to Council r garding the background t) this matter. e a second ading /public hearing the ordinance on Nia s 3. Ordinance 35 -97 - An Ordinauce Autho zing the City Manag to Enter into a Contract with t . fraternal Order of olice Ohio Lab icil Regarding 11abo , Hour•, Terms lbetween Cond Employment, an eclaring an ency m ell introduce ord' . ' sby stated tha is ng emergency ion tonight. Mr. Har ng has d a memo highl the act provision nd is available for qu bons. mpbell moved tense the public ing and treat this as ergeney ion on the basis the cot needs to a in effect as soon as ssible based labor negotiatio ween ity an he affected personnel. ide Pittaluga c the n. M Kranr, s; Mr. Campbell, yes• rs. Stillwell, yes; ide Pittal a, yes. Bo; Mr. McCash, yes, Vote on the o ' Hide luga, yes; Mrs. Stillw 1, yes; Mr. McCash ring, yes; Campyes; Mayor Kranst er, yes. 7rKin dpra ambell indicat/ he will abstain from is discussion and then ft the room. stated thaurch has requested waiver of the require nt to construct a sidewalk ranklin Street . I as been the policy to r uire a deposit when items such as ikepaths, street trees sidewalks are waived, t this would be at the discretion of uneil. Mrs. Boring p ted out that the prope y owner in this case is church and not a developer. 1 he City decides to ins 11 sidewalks in the futu along Franklin Street, an assessm t can be clone at that e. She cannot support wiring a deposit frog the char with the granting of is waiver. She en moved to V idewalk waiver with no eposit required /SCWCIII church. Stillwell to otion. e Pittaluga, yes; M .Boring, yes; Mrs. yes; Mr. McCash, yes; nstuber, yes. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP mittee Repuels McCash, Cum v s ted that they will meet [s Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road 3mis M114 Mr. Smith rep ted that research T an ordinance w approved by Council 35 years ag .vacating this alley, hation plat was ever filed with the county au _tor. Engineering is no plat, and le slation will be introdu d at the next Council the rpose. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION January 2, 1997 fl OF I11 5800 %W Rings Road Dul k OH 43011.1236 ,o/1DO: 614/161 -6550 FwL 614/161.606 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Development Plan - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road Location: 17.237 acres located on the southeast corner of Rings Road and I -270 Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Chakeres and Wheatley /Puckett Plans). Request: Review and approval of a master plan for a major office building and of a development plan under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: A two-phase, 295,000 square foot, five -story office building. Applicant: Duke Construction, c/o Mark Gialluca, 4700 Lakehurst Court, Suite 150, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this application because it complies with the approved Chakeres and Wheatley/Puckett PCD composite plan and development texts and provides for coordination among those parcels, furthers the economic development goals of the City and the Mount Auburn Study, and adds to the highly successful Tuttle Crossing office park, with 18 conditions: 1) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 2) That the three lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 3) - That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 4) That right -of -way consistent with the Rings Road widening plan and /or casements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, as required by the City Engineer; 6) That the design of the private drives and parldng areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; That all signage for this site comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Page 1 of 2 Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION RECORD OF ACTION January 2, 1997 4. Development Plan - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road (Continued) 9) That landscaping comply with Code and incorporate the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 12) That stormwater management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaldng any site changes; and 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit. * Don Hunter agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION _U "_ - �&A� Mary H. ewcomb Landscape Planner 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Page 2 of 2 Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning scion Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 16 8) That the plicant fund the cons trees ong the Avery Road u n road widening); r .on of an eight -foot b path and installation of^slreet prior to issuance of a building permit (to be installed 9) hat the applicant in5prporate design features established for the Avery Ytoad corridor in ,. connection with aryy`revised development plan; 10) That ground ,rage be limited to six feet in height, and that any sign base match th building- / 11) That tllerstorm water management meet the requirements,of the City Engineer; 12) Th Ohio EPA approval be "received for reuse of the on -site disposal sys m prior to seance of a building periinit; That the design of th f riv e deway and standards for the parking area be roved by the City Engineer; 14) That a revi development text and a site dimension plan wh* incorporates all of t e condir /and an expansion of the tekt, including definition d commitments mad t this me . be s ubmitted within t4'0 weeks; and 15) at the use of property be to a photograph' studio and small office , and that any other uses will require r zoning of the site. �Mr. Harian second " motion. Mr. Low to tXaboveco ns. The vote was fo llo:Einnici-Zuercher ldw, yes; Mr. Lecklider, Mr. Sprague- Zuercher, ye - r. Hari Mr. Ferrara, yes. proved 4 -2.) Ms. thank Mr. Low and welcomed" him to Dublin. 4. Development Plan - Rings Road Office Building - 5455 Rings Road Bobbie Clarke and Mary Newcomb presented this development plan. Ms. Clarke said Duke Corporation plans to develop in the Rings Road, Tuttle Crossing, and Thomas - Kohler areas. Duke is trying to buy all property between I -270 and Blazer Parkway. Three sites are currently zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District: The Chakeres Property abutting I -270, zoned equivalent to the Tuttle Crossing for 18,000 square feet per acre and Wheatley and Puckett sites, five acres combined, zoned for 14,000 square feet per acre. This development plan includes all three sites. Y �w Ms. Clarke said this 19 acres is currently zoned PCD for office and hotel uses. Access from Blazer Parkway will be developed if Duke is successful in buying them. A future Rings Road access is shown in the Master plan on the Pagura property which is still residentially zoned. The south phase of this development will be the first. The 290,000 square foot, five -story office building will be built in two pieces with a connecting atrium. The first building to be built this Ln spring will be approximately 150,000 square feet. Phase 1 meets all the criteria set out in both zonings ( Chakeres and Wheatley /Puckett). Modifications will be necessary to handle the overall Q site. This is part of a master plan for the area and there are some relatively minor text revisions v needed. The applicant is asking for approval of the entire site at this time, pending any text o revisions needed at a later date. a v Mary Newcomb said a 290,000 square foot, five -story office building will be constructed on 19 g a acres. The building is to be located in the middle of the site and will have access in the first phase a o v Ln M= G p W Y Ln rl Cr 0 U Zr Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 17 r-- from Rings Road. Near I -270, there is a very steep embankment along Rings Road which restricts access to the site. The access, approximately 1,000 feet west of Blazer Parkway, will have to meet the approval of the City Engineer. Parking for 1,195 cars exceeds the requirement by 35 cars. The parking is located around the building. An existing fencerow is along the Nationwide site to the south. Two dry basins are shown. Wet basins need to be utilized wherever possible as required by the rezoning. The basins are in the lowest portion of the site and require removing the trees. The Phase 2, Pagura property access, could not happen until that property is rezoned. All loading/ service areas will need to be screened according to Code. The landscaping, mostly meets the Code requirements. A signage package has not been submitted. The Chakeres text permits a ground and a wall sign facing I -270. Any signage proposed for this site will have to comply with the text and Sign Code and be architecturally integrated with the building. Ms. Newcomb said there was currently a study of the Rings Road traffic being undertaken. The I -270 bridge will be widened in the near future. The traffic study indicates that four lanes and a landscape median will be adequate on Rings Road. The applicant is proposing to coordinate the building with adjacent buildings. Ms. Newcomb said colors and materials (dark, aggregate, precast panels) similar to those used on the Tuttle Eleven building are proposed. The lower levels of the building will be a darker aggregate with a medium colored aggregate above them. Silver - colored reflective glass will be used on the upper levels and a bronze - tinted glass will be used on the lower level. C E am N E Q o a v o U� o N � c LL E a � CL v ,n oav�� a�E a• �ozS Cn O p N Y Lf) N J M In rl v N L ZT .ti U Ln Staff recommends approval of this development plan with the following 18 conditions: 1) That text modifications (rezoning) to permit the proposed density of the second phase be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two; 2) That the three lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 3) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 4) That right -of -way consistent with the Rings Road widening plan and /or easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, as required by the City Engineer; 6) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction, including grading, with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 8) That all signage for this site comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 9) That landscaping comply with Code and incorporate the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; ,•• 12) That stormwater management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impact on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; C E am N E Q o a v o U� o N � c LL E a � CL v ,n oav�� a�E a• �ozS Cn O p N Y Lf) N J M In rl v N L ZT .ti U Ln Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 18 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plans (for the BMW and Atrium buildings) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to construction; and 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit. Mr. Peplow asked how the parking lot would be screened since Rings Road had such a high embankment. Ms. Newcomb said it is to be worked out between the applicant and staff. Staff feels that a double staggered row of evergeens would be an acceptable solution. Mr. Harian asked if the Washington Township Fire Department had signed off on the site. Ms. Newcomb said an additional fire hydrant in the rear of the site was requested. Don Hunter, Duke Construction, agreed to all the above conditions. He asked if the following could be added to Condition #1: "...if a rezoning is required in the opinion of the City Attorney; ". He understood that Condition #17 related to the interconnection of the parking lots between the Atrium Building and this Rings Road building. Ms. Newcomb said the site plan had three access points shown to the Nationwide site to the south. If the applicant was proposing to do so, staff requests that the Nationwide site be brought back before the Commission as a revised development plan. Mr. Hunter understood and agreed to the condition. He said none of the proposed development related to the BMW site, and he wanted that reference removed. Mr. Hunter said their intent was to develop the entire area in a cohesive, coordinated manner that gives continuity of development, etc. He has the Pagura property in contract. Ms. Clarke said Condition #17 should not reference the BMW building and she proposed the following language: "That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan for the Atrium Building be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to the undertaking any site changes. " Mr. Hunter agreed to this amended Condition #17 language. Jim Houk, Bird Houk Associates, reviewed the site and landscaping plan. They will dedicate 10 more feet of right -of -way and 30 feet of easement for widening Rings Road. A landscaped boulevard at a main entrance on the Pagura property is proposed. The interior landscaping islands have been doubled to 10 percent and the interior number of trees exceeds Code by 20 percent. A six -foot landscape screen was designed and was part of the Chakeres rezoning. The Chakeres plan for street trees along Rings Road is part of this plan, but they are willing to work with staff ro to change the landscaping to the pine program, as suggested by Mary Newcomb. Mature trees existing near the two residential sites will be preserved where possible. When the Pagura property _C: E is rezoned, they will probably request an expansion to the existing parking lot. He said the wet o a retention basin would be included in the second phase on Rings Road when the Pagura site is 'w.. rezoned. ° f0 � a Mr. Ferrara asked about pedestrian and bicycle access. Mr. Houk said there were no bikepaths. a Ln a v + s The parking aisles were angled to guide pedestrians from the aisles to the greenspace. Mr. ° v E L, Ferrara asked if there would be a bikepath or sidewalk along Rings Road. M o v oo v�L, N > M U) N ° V Ln Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 19 Ms. Newcomb said the Rings Road widening will have a bikepath, but she was not sure on which side. Balbir Kindra said a bridge placement was being coordinated with ODOT and one side of Rings Road will have a bikepath and the other side will be sidewalk. Mr. Ferrara wanted the bikepath because he did not want the interstate to divide Dublin. Employees in Dublin take advantage of the bike /pedestrian system . Mr. Kindra said Council has committed $100,000 per year to fill the bikepath gaps. Mr. Ferrara wanted to make sure that the extra ten feet of right -of -way dedicated would be enough. Mr. Houk said the bikepath would be along the north side. Mr. Ferrara asked if stone or vegetation would be used around the wet detention area. Mr. Houk said specifics of the wet pond would be addressed when the Pagura site is rezoned. He said it was approximately 1 to 1.5 acres. Mr. Hunter said the size could not be committed to at this time. Gerry Bird, Bird Houk Associates, said they tried to design the building to fit into the neighborhood which includes the Nationwide and John Alden buildings to create an angled relationship to the interstate. There is a small facade on the Rings Road side of the building. He showed material samples to the Commission of the glass and precast aggregate to be used. He said a synthetic plaster of the same color and detail as the precast material would be used on the penthouse. The service entrance faces Rings Road which would have a precast wall. Mr. Peplow said the tree line located near the power line seemed to divide the two sites. He asked if there were plans to relocate the power line and to make them seem more combined. Mr. Houk said it was important to preserve the trees along that line. Mr. Houk said there were no plans to bury the power line. Ms. Clarke said the overhead power line was new and was approved by Council several years ago in conjunction with Tuttle Crossing. Because it was within an existing tree row, it was considered hidden enough. Mr. Peplow said it was very visible in the winter. Mr. Sprague asked if there would be any roof top screening for mechanicals or satellite dishes. Mr. Bird said there is a 24 to 30 inch parapet wall. The penthouses are open for mechanicals. Mr. Lecklider asked about exterior building illumination. Mr. Bird said uplighting close to the building was proposed. Mr. Bird said the angle and the trajectory of the light could be controlled. Most of the Duke buildings had soft exterior uplighting. Mr. Houk said it would conform to the Chakeres and Wheatley /Puckett text and have 28 -foot high cutoff fixtures. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked when the sign package would be submitted. Mr. Hunter said it would be tied to the building lease. Mr. Houk said it was 50 feet from I -270 to the parking lot. He said the Chakeres zoning text called for a six foot high mound along it with a mixture of evergreen, ornamental, and deciduous plantings. Mr. Hunter said the parking lot should be screened from the interstate, and it should be similar to that of the Nationwide building. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett- Atrium ii Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 20 Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said a water feature was desired somewhere on this property. Mr. Hunter said they would commit to the water feature in the general location shown with a future rezoning that allowed 14,000 square feet of density per acre. The size of the water feature will depend upon engineering, but it will be approximately one acre. Mr. Ferrara said stone should be incorporated around the pond. Mr. Hunter committed to the wet pond. Ms. Clarke said any water feature would be an improvement over the non - conforming Pagura landscape site. She commended Duke. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher reiterated the need for a pond. Mr. Ferrara was concerned there are no sidewalks or bikepaths. Ms. Clarke said there will be one on Rings Road, a City project. Mr. Ferrara said building occupants will want to use a network of connected bikepaths and sidewalks. Mr. Hunter said a bikepath going east/west is planned on the north side of Rings Road with the road widening. He said they were looking at options to connect the pedestrian system together. People will not walk a mile to a restaurant. Mr. Harian said the water feature was important. He agreed pedestrian paths are needed in this development. It is a nice addition to Dublin. Messrs. Ferrara, Peplow and Lecklider agreed. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said that the water feature was not part of this application. Mr. Ferrara made a motion to approve this application because it complies with the approved Chakeres and Wheatley /Puckett PCD composite plan and development texts and provides for _coordination among those parcels, furthers the economic development goals of the City and the Mount Auburn Study, and adds to the highly successful Tuttle Crossing office park, with 18 conditions: 1) That development text modifications, to permit the density associated with the second phase, be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase Two, if such rezoning action is required in the opinion of the Law Director; 2) That the three lots, or portions thereof, being utilized be legally combined; 3) That access to the site meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 4) That right -of -way consistent with the Rings Road widening plan and /or easements for Rings Road be deeded to the City by general warranty deed and provided to the Division of Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit; 5) That temporary left turn stacking on Rings Road be provided, as required by the City Engineer; 6) That the design of the private drives and parking areas be approved by the City Engineer; 7) That existing trees be protected prior to and during all phases of construction (including grading) with temporary snow fencing to be located at least 15 feet from the dripline, and that fencing be shown on all site, grading, construction and landscape plans, subject to staff approval; 8) That all signage for this site comply with the development text and the Dublin Sign Code; 9) That landscaping comply with Code and incorporate the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; 10) That all mechanical units and loading areas be fully screened per Code; 11) That site lighting conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 12) That stormwater management meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 13) That water meter pits be located outside of the right -of -way and public easements and be located below grade or be fully screened, subject to staff approval; a a _ E v 0 0 a 0 > Y Ol U 6 U 0 =o a a U-1 LL E a a ° 1.QJ E� a o v .6 G p N Y Ln N > m Ln cI K N u V rl � U lIl Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 2, 1997 Page 21 14) That the grading plan be revised to reduce the impatct on existing trees; 15) That an additional fire hydrant be added, subject to approval by Washington Township Fire Department; 16) That the Pagura property be properly rezoned prior to any development on that site, including access provisions; 17) That the affected Tuttle Crossing development plan (for the Atrium building) be formally reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to undertaking any site changes; and 18) That a revised landscape plan, site dimension plan, and grading plan, reflecting all conditions of approval be submitted within two weeks, and that they be approved prior to issuance of any building permit. Don Hunter agreed to the conditions as amended above. Mr. Harian seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Approved 6-0.) 5. Rezoning lication Z96 -013 - ,veterinary Hospital 3$59 West Dubfln ranville Road The appl' ant withdrew this � prior last week. as not discussed, d no vote was is P - K Dublin Road G g Plan - McKit UD illilea This case was np called before 11:( p.m. It was resch discussed for hearing on J nary 16. The meetjxlg was adjourned atX.00 p.m. by Chair )darilee Chinnici-Zu"er. submitted, jpa�'A Libby Fdrley I Planning Com lion Secretary 11- 0342 /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting 7, 1995 19 Mr. >Foegi stated that when Council a pts the 1996 operating bud t including the 1996 capital compon t, a more detailed review be undertaken of the 1996 apital items. Staff will incl /Pa 'ttthe a in the ordinance adoptin a 1996 budget which will end the five -year CIP to a it ble with the 1996 budg oeuments. Staff will be r mmending adoption of the a -year August 21 Count" acting, recognizing that C ncil reserves the right to de a and re- define some portions duri the 1996 operating budget el&rations in the fall. The ve -year CEP does not appropriate ey and does not restrict C cil legally in any manner. Mrs. King Indic her support of adopting a five -year CIP to provide framework to meet Council's /Discuon oal . She also emphasized the ' pottance of traffic to eats for the OCLC area uled to begin in 1996. is should be maintained as riority. wed on the status o€ a proposed paveme nt mane meat system which was bu eted the contingency taunt. that he cann support a $100,000 syste bich has not been demons ted to be effective for a City of Du n's size. Mayor Campbell brott the discussion to closure, ng if there were four me ers of Co uncil who would authorize a staff to take RFP's for pavement management s m. There was not su ort from four members of until. Mr. Foegler no that staff will put that m er on hold at this time. Mr. Strip co ented that he would like ore information on the subi t. Mr. F gler continued his presents ' n: 3. Staff has prepared a list all possible sites to be co idered for acquisition, bas upon previous discussion w` Council. These will have be prioritized for the sho erm, and he understands tha a Administrative Committ will establish a time on Co tit's agenda for an executive ession to discuss these [Hatt s, i 4. He emphasiz that many of the budget amounts for major proje are based upon estimates ich are prepared prior to • design work for a prolec . Staff would like to develo system within the capital dget to indicate that num s are "pre - conceptual" vers 'preliminary estimates" b on partial design. Mayor ampbell noted that if Cou members have questions out specific items, they s ld fo d those questions to him so at they can be addressed b taff prior to the next readi e when �l ncil has been asked to tak ction on the ordinance. �I ere will be a third readin of the ordinance at the Au t 21 Council meeting. r Mr. Hanley reported at staff is recommending O ��aa rdinance No. 17 -94 re tabled. Ordinance No. 21- has been previously tabled Council until October 2,,1995. Ordinance N . 55 -95 (Amended) ; An Or nance Authorizing the Expcution and Delivery of an Amendme to the Real Estate Pur a Agreement Dated 1 eb�dary 2/cka mend Relatin o the Purchase by the C' of All or a Portion of I1WMcKitr yes; Mrs. Stillwell, Mrs. King, yes; yes; Mr. ark, d Decl ng an Emergency. (TabI Ordinance) awaly moved to take this om the table. Strip seconded the moti V n - Mr ; Kranstuber, yes; Maya amp6e11, yes; Mr. Strip, Mr. Hanley stated t staff is recommending th ouncit defeat this ordinaas set up as a contingency ° the event that the real ez closings with Cardinal He• ke place. Those closing ave now taken place. W Vote gn thq rd'napcg - Mr. Zawaly, no- rs. Stillwell, no; Mrs. Ki , no; Mayor Campbell, no; Mr. Stri no; Mr. Kranstuber, no; . Boring, no. Ordinance No. 23 -95 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.114 Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Corner of I -270 and Rings Road From: R -1A, Restricted Suburban Residential District, To: PCD, Planned Commerce District. ( Chakeres Land Co.) (Third Reading) (Applicant: Chakeres Land Co., c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017) I Mr. Hanley stated that staff is recommending adoption. Dote on the Ordinance with the recommendations of Planl,{t�& Zoning Commission Mrs. Stillwell, i; yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. �i 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Min utes o Meeting July X1995 9 bri s Cl tnp&M Post Roal noted that the appficant and the residents approa is application with differs perspectives. The applicant the proposal in the contex f the major road and intgsiiction location. The residents it in the context of a detail land use plan which was ted through three planneEnings. ` is - Perimeter Center, Lowell T ce,and the Riverside property He then described in detail lan in which he was the ne Bator for the Post Road Resid Association on each of the He summarized that a residents do not believe that etail use of this intensity is can be a transitional use, N ount of landscaping can ov me the incompatible aspee of this retail use. Two of the L ge districts in the immediate ,Riverside and Lowell as have office uses on the corn of Post and Avery. They be " e that this site should be in a similar manner - as a pl ed office use. This will be a cessful transitional zoning gory; is compatible with reside al use; will bring significant fi cial premium over the press LI zoning; will bring net gain fr m income tax; will lessen the fie impact on Avery from ing movements; will promote flier than barm the gateway co ept for this area; and will not de- stabilize the current officy oning for the two quadran at are already in place at intersection, Lowell M Road stated that his hom 1 01fs on the 2.5 acres on the norpAest corner recently rezoned z office, including a church chool. He is not opposed to A and within the community elieves that there is avadabISJ&d located nearby which is alr y zoned retail and would be rfecdy suited for this use. H oted that a community orient roeess began in 1987 with c!1's approval of the Lowell ace PUD, including the zoning 14+ acres for office and ins ' tional use at the northwest co r of Post and Avery Road. So after, the Riverside tract was 4tpprovvd for office developmen t the southwest corner. Early 21 year, a multi - stage low imps plan was approved for a ch and school campus along w an office building on the no est comer of Post and Ave In discussions with potential ce users for his site, he found at they will not consider an scale office structure locatio across from a SuperAmerica ility. He believes office de opment is the proper use for site in order to protect zonings ready in place for the north t corner. He asked that until continue to support vision that their predecess and the Post and Avery coma nity have shared and planned since 1987. Koaff Easl9p 03%) qw I fiv stated that he is Presrde ff the Lowell Trace Civic Asociation. They strongly opp the proposal based on land use n previous zonings, on the bas! of the 1988 Community Pi and the existing Post Road ties. The impact on the adj nt corners and the surround" neighborhoods would be very gative. A gas station is already ed for the Perimeter Ce r. There are other locations ilable and more suited to a Su rAmerica Station, Approvi this rezoning proposal could b e a ripple effect upon the existi office -zoned lots and make ern less attractive for office us s. He urges Council to defeat s proposal. . FF -0 representing the applicant ' ant ted out that it is important to c ider the existing zoning on s property and the uses permi under that zoning. The curre zoning is not a transitional e for this corner and is notjKropriate. If this had been ins ed in Perimeter, the adjacent Perimeter subarea would in allow a service station use. a other factor is that there are o other sites in Perimeter 3Kilable - they are all deed restric . There will be a "'06 reading of the ordinance at tli�r ugust 7 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 23 -95 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.114 Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Corner of I -270 and Rings Road From: R -1A, Restricted Suburban Residential District, To: PCD, Planned Commerce District. ( Chakeres Land Co.) (Public Hearing) (Applicant: Chakeres Land Co., c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017) Registered as a proponent of the rezoning was Chris Cline, 37 W. Bridge Street. There were no registered opponents of the rezoning. Ms. Clarke showed slides of the subject site and described the surrounding area. The rezoning application would rezone this property from R -lA, a single family classification left over from a Washington township annexation to PCD, Planned Commerce District for an office park with basically the same standards of Perimeter Center. She noted that access is the one problem with the overall site. Staff is hoping that an access point wilt be combined with the Wheatley and Puckett properties. This is a 14 -acre application located Dn the south side of Rings Road with immediate visibility and frontage along I -270. Staff and Planning Commission are recommending approval of 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP this application. It was approved by P & Z in May with 6 conditions: Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final 1. That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70 Development Plan percent of lot area); Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting — Page 7 19 Held July 17, 1995 2. That right -of -way along Icings Road consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3. That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if possible; 4, That al l private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 5. That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the stormwater management facilities; and 6. That a left -turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. Ms. Clarke noted that the applicant agreed to these conditions. Chris Cline attorney for the applicant stated that land planner Jim Houk is with him this evening to respond to questions. He clarified that the standards being met are those of Tuttle Crossing, not Perimeter. He then offered to respond to questions. There were no questions. There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the August 7 Council meeting. Mr. Hansley noted that staff is recommending that Ordinance No. 17 -94 remain tabled at this time. Ordinance No. - 95 (Amended) - An Ord' ce Amending Ordinance o. 62 - 88 (Amended) to Update t Arterial Traffic Plan for City of Dublin. (Tabled rdinance) Mr, l;oeg noted that staff is recomm ing that Ordinance No. 21 the Arterial Traffic Plan, be tabl until October 2, 1995. A sue was raised at the pubii Baring of this ordinance ab gal the er in which the propos ghts -of -way impact the pro at Tuttle and Wilcox, ers o at land have indicated a wi gness to work with staff to olve those issues by lookin some alternate development. Has upon this, staff requests Co cil table the ordinance until tuber 2, 1995. Mr. Zawaly mov at Ordinance No. 21 -95 b • hlcd until October 2, 1995 Mrs. Stillwell s nded the motion. V i - /�y es; Mr. " awaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, y Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. Still !l, yes. ?,Ha nee No. 41 -95 ce to Amend Section 351. (33us Stops /axica Codified Ordie City of Dublin, Ohio. ird Reading) nley noted ths included in the pack esponding to Cou how this proposal woighborhoods. e n the or inn y, yes; Mrs. Hari ,Yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Stillwell cs; Mr. Strip, yes. Ordinance . 55 -95 - An Ordinance Aut rizing the Execution and D very of an Amendment to the Re^tate Purchase Agrcem fed February 2, 1995, Amended, Relating to th Purch by the City of All or a onion of the McKitrick ice Park, and Declaring r ency. (Third Reading) egler noted that this le ' ation was set up as a contin ey in the event that the ac isition dinal of the McKitric property did not take place ince the project has clos escrow, staff requests that Count ble this action until the esc w closing date has passed w eh will have taken place by the A st 7 meeting. At that tim assuming all has gone as ed, staff will request Council taVaction to defeat this ordinarpt. Mrs. Stillwe0noved to table Ordinance N . 55 -95 until August 7, 1995 Mr. Strip onded the motion. Vo te i - Mr. Krantuber es; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zaw , yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; 1 Still ll, yes; Mayor Campbell, l rdinance No. 45 -95 - An dinance Authorizing the Ci anager to Enter into a C greement wit/nd of Columbus for an Inters tion Improvement at l4ra ayden Run R Reading) rs. Stillwell that she convened a ing last week of the affe ed resi ayden Run an corner of Old Du to Road with Mr. Hanley r. Kind 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road CI 'Y () F 0L;;LlN DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MAY 4 1995 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regularly scheduled meeting: 2. Rezoning Application Z95 -006 - Chakeres Property Location: + 14.114 acres located at the southeast comer of I -270 and Rings Road. Existing Zoning: R -lA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Classification). Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Proposed Use: Office park. Applicant: Chakeres Land Co., c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with the following six conditions: 1) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70 ' percent of lot area); 2) That right -of -way along Rings Road consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if possible; 4) That all private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the stormwater management facilities; and 6) That a left -tum lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. * Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This rezoning application will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Planning Director Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 4, 1995 Page 9 1. Fishman said he�would also like to ave the applicant nsider other sites 2. Rezoning Application Z95 -006 - Chakeres Property Bobbie Clarke presented this case and slides. The site is across Rings Road from the Ashland Chemical complex, zoned OLR, Office Laboratory and Research. She said the only obstacle to development of this property is grade along Rings Road for the I -270 overpass. Access to the site is only possible at the easternmost point of the site. Ideally, access would be consolidated for this and the other two surrounding properties (Wheatley and Puckett). At this time, there is no layout for the site itself. It is zoned R -lA, which is a single - family, one -acre lot classification. The request is for PCD, Planned Commerce District, generally for office and hotel uses, including all SO and OLR uses. The development text submitted contains the same density, uses, and similar standards as are currently zoned for property along the freeway as part of the Tuttle Crossing development. This application will require four votes of the Planning Commission to be recommended to City Council. She said the text contains language regarding commercial or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or hotel use, which provides for services such as a news stand or coffee shop on the first floor. The proposed density is 18,000 square feet per acre, which is the highest anywhere in the community, but the same as the I -270 frontage at Tuttle Crossing. ' Ms. Clarke said Staff is recommending approval of this application with the following six conditions because it is an appropriate land use and the PCD is the appropriate district: 1) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70 percent of lot area); 2) That right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if possible; 4) That all private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the stormwater management facilities; and 6) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. Staff believes this application is thoroughly consistent with the long -term expectations for the area, with the economic development policy, and also confirms the Thoroughfare Plan. �ft. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 4, 1995 Page 10 Mr. Ferrara asked if Condition #2 would affect the slope to which Ms. Clarke referred in her presentation. Ms. Clarke said no, the slope should already be included within a slope easement as part of the I -270 construction. Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, agrees with all the conditions recommended by Staff. Jim Houk, Bird and Houk, said he will meet the landscape requirements along I -270 and the setbacks. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher made a motion to approve this rezoning application with the following six conditions: 1) That the Development Text be revised to include the current lot coverage standard (70 percent of lot area); 2) That right -of -way along Rings Road consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all Rings Road access be subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to development with consideration given to visibility, grading, roadway conditions and other driveway placement, and that access be combined with the property to the east if possible; 4) That all private street, easements, utilities and stormwater management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 5) That a stormwater management plan for the entire site be undertaken subject to approval of the City Engineer and that wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the stormwater management facilities; and 6) That a left -tum lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) 3. evised Final Deve pment Plan - Mo an House - 5300 ick Road ry Newcomb prese ed this case and sli s. The applicant ' requesting relief f m two of le conditions attac d to the approval rated in December, 994. Specifically a applicant does not wish to nform with Dublin tghting Guidelines the Landscape Co in the parking /plus pli nt proposes to add • rail to the existing it rail fence for sc ening, which will ee -foot screenin requirement. The 'ght fixtures are no ut -off fix tures, an le plan has bee ubmitted to meet a footcandle req ' ements of the C o the Landscap ode, parking lots a to be screened w' one deciduous tr per a three -foot ight continuous sc en, which can be a anting, hedge, fen , wall, nd. A m' imum of 50 percen inter opacity and 7 percent summer o city must 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 - -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- _ Meeting NO. IO1a9 - - - - - -- -- _ _ Held April 24, 1995 V Mr. We' finger indicated that he ieves that some respons' elity rests with the City r notifying buyer of parkland locations, ct Council has a working lationship with the devel er and must "at out for the interests of ture residents. ayor Campbell suggest that prospective buyers rm with City staff the ' formation provided by developers or build S. City staff a members a familiar with the co fitments made by the developer at the time f the rezoning. Mr. Hahn confi ed that the neighborh park in Wellington Pl has been identified on le proposed capi budget, and monies h e been budgeted for p planning in 1996 an ark development • 1997. The neighborh will have input into the arming process for the rk, but he emphas' ed that the park has alw s been slated to be an a ve, neighborhood park. Mayor ampbell asked that the ks division provide no ' cation to Mr. Weld Inge t the time of the k planning process for is area. He added that a park will not be passi - it will be of a� ighborhood scale and w' be active parkland. Council Roundtable Kin noted that /is now important to thagYall of the citizens and b mess representatives for their efforts in wri ;' g letters to the governye and other state and ral officials regarding impo= unding of the I -270 widening project. d that she would also like to thank the City C. members from cit1 along the north erbelt who assisted with this effort. She added it is important to nitor the progress this project, especially iii. terms of the design phase staying on track. The ign phase is to b mpleted by July of 1998_ f` r Thanked all of the•students from the Americ* government classes at blin Coffman High School for theiPinterest in the goverarn t process as demonstra by their attendance tonight. 2. Suggested that Council consider impleffienting an option on the I]ublin tax forms for tho /oined n efunds to designate a ton to be donated Zvestigate �Qland acquisition fun or and acquisition fund. f discussion, it was the ansensus, of Council that the hene6 lamentation of su h ' and the P c a process. with Mrs. King) requesting a response from staff to the concerns aised in Mr. l Swingle's letter regarding the Coffman ad widening and i mpact y on his property d Road. , �f Discussion followed about the City's policies in gard to notification of r ldents of survey work being undertaken on their property. Mr. Hensley stated that staff is working o policy for notification this time. Mayor Campbell stated that: 1. Mr/Strip had suggested that nancial statements be pro dcd to Council on a qu erly basis rather than monthl., 'rn .,, P . r VVJ • •. v iIVLI iivui u unc members to this c ange. 2. �vlrs. King and Mrs. S dwell are to be con ec for their hard wor on the 1 -270 widening project. Th usinesses in the City az�y//ery appreciative of the' efforts. r' Wslat Ordinance No. 103-94 (Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 5.284 Acres of band, Located on the South Side of Rings Road, Approximately Midway Between Blazer Parkway and 1-270, from: R -1A, , Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington I Township Zoning ClassfFicallon) to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Wheatley and Puckett , properties) (Third Reading) (Applicant: The Edwards Land Company, c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215) Mrs. King moved that the text be amended to delete the word "essentially" from the first condition, Mr. Kranstuber seconded the emotion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Kranstuber, es' Mr. Str 11 034Z /PDP /FDP Y , p, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 a rr rrr.- rccv�:n° c�r�� I Hel April 10 19 _ t❑ Wednesda . 2. MORP ill host an I -270 North terbek Corridor Study /06 house from 4 to 8 p. on sday, April 20 in Worthi gton. 3. Co ratulations are in order f former Mayor Joe Dixo , his family and friends ' Old din who recently won S in prize money on A r' F iest Home, V' 7 r n commented: 1 She has an article of ' crest from regarding profitable am roes for cities. Dublin is on the ' ht track since desirable enities include nature as open space, walkways and N epaths. 2. She wants the ity to be involved to an a ropriate degree in the I -7 4)irnpike discussions. Mr. Hanley res nded that Mr. Kindra is icipating in the meeting At this point, the City i not lobbying f location of the prapos�tirnpike. He suggested t Council provide staff w'fh direction on is issue. // Mrs. Kin suggested that the Coen tiaity Development COmali ee study this issue to d slop a pol icy. // Mr, awaly moved that the Co unity Development Co ttee study the I -73 issu in order to r mmend a policy to Coun ' r. Kranstuber seconded motion. well, yes; Mr. Strip, y • r. Zawaly, yes; l, yes; Mrs. 5 ' Y= on the motion - M r Campbel d Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr I g, yes; Mr. Kranstub , yes. Mr Strip noted the Finance Committee ill meet next w/ce bed tax app/�ta reported that he, Mr. ansley, Chief Fereis went to Virginia f reaccreditation hearings or the Police divisioneived accre another a -year period. He congr ated Chief Derrell and division o the ci ' ens of Dublin for this ac evement. Wslation Ordinance No. 103-94 (Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 5.284 Acres of ]Land, Located on the South Side of Rings Road, Approximately Midway Between Bh=Parkway and 1 -270, from: R -1A, , Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Zoning Classification) to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Wheatley and Puckett properties) (Public Hearing) ( Applicant: The Edwards Land Company, clo Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215) Registered as a proponent was Chris Cline, 37 W. Bridge Street, There were no registered opponents to the rezoning. Ms. Newcomb showed slides of the site, noting that the right -of -way along Rings Road needs to be consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, which is 40 feet from centerline. The utilities are available to this site. Regarding access, staff is recommending that there be one combined access for the initial development. There are some fairly severe grade changes along Rings Road toward I -270, and it will require strong attention to site triangles at the entry points. On March 2, Planning Commission recommended approval of this rezoning application with five conditions: 1) That the development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District; 2) The right -of - -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 4) That wet basin( be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management facilities: and 5) That a left -turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. Mayor Campbell noted that the applicant was not present. Mr. Cline was the only person who �+ signed in as a proponent of the rezoning. Chris 'n , AttomU, 37 West Bridgg,, representing the adjoining landowner to the west, the Pagura Land Company, stated they are in favor of this rezoning. He has filed a rezoning application 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP scheduled for first reading later tonight which extends the quality standards established at Tuttle Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Crossing into new areas. This is the first time that a developer other than the Edwards Company Development Plan is adopting the same standards. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Hel April 10, 1995 19 Mrs. Stillwell asked for clarification of office "related" uses as contained in the text. Ms. Newcomb responded that this would include mid -sized office and small office uses which will be consistent with subarea B. Mrs. Stillwell has concerns with the language "essentially consistent" in condition #1. Ms. Newcomb responded that the text is fairly consistent now, but some things will make it even more consistent with the subarea B within the Tuttle development. Mr. Hanley pointed out that these conditions were recommended by Planning Commission, and therefore staff cannot make changes to them. Mrs. King suggested that staff prepare amendments to clarify this language for Council's consideration at the third reading. There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the April 24 Council meeting. I /Road ublin, ce No. 26-94 (Amended) - An rdinanee Providing Par Cha nge of Zoning of 59 f La , Located on the North est Corner of Post Roa and Avery Road, fro PJD t1 t Development District d R -1, Restricted Res ential District to: i I ' D lanned , oprnent District. (Mas roperty - Northwest Pr yterian Church) (Pub Hearing) t: Ruth E. Mast, 6759 cry Road, Dublin, Ohio 3017, c/o Robert J. Ape , 5640 Frantz ublin, Ohio 43017) d as a proponent of a rezoning was Robert A e1, 5640 Frantz Road, D lin Ohio. There registered opponetils. comb explained this is the Suburb Office and institutional rtion of the Lowell Tr subdivision. Tht expansion is the inclusi of'three R -1 areas to til6 parcel. The request is to review and approve a preliminary level meat plan foi an 84,9 square foot church elementary school building and 27,000 squ feet of office space. Shp'presented slides, noting at the acreage is Iodated on the northwest co er of Post Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive. The are two existing residences at this site. a church is planning to/use one of the resides as a temporary office until the first phase the church is completW There is an existing r ' ence on Avery- Mufield and that residenc will stay until the offices are constructed. The pplicant is /Ping - proposing to construct a ut 30,000 square feet ofsanetuary and four class ms to serve dents. At build -rut, 555 parking spaces will be shared by the church, schoo d office uses. will also be availabl r the public to access the Red Trabue Nature Pres e. Three access re proposed: one? Avery Muirfield and a full service cuts on P Road. There is a d detention basin4o be located within the r�idture preserve. Building ill be constructed of brick, stucco/stone an4cedar trim. She noted that 1?14F ing Commission recommended approval with to nditions: 1) That fl dway, floodway plus 20 feet, and floodplain bound ies be accurately shown n all plat, planning, building permit,, and engineering docume and that all City Cod a met regarding floodways and floodplains; 2) Tliat the tree preservation p)an be revised and that th ce fencing locations be dicated on / U plans, subject to Staff approval, and that the fe ing be installed prior to d during ail i phases of construction;, 3) That five -foot wide sidewalks be installed alo ost Road and Avery -M irfteld Drive, that a bikepath connec ,ion be provided from the ite to the existing Red abue bikepath, and that bicycle parkj�g be provided on site, s feet to Staff approval; 4) That a left turq 'stacking lane, subject to proval by the City Eng" eer, be installed on Post Road when the parking lot is expand beyond Phase I; 5) That right -Af -way be dedicated at corner of Post Road Avery- Muirfield Drive or the pure se of traffic signal ins Lion; 6) That Pa western driveway on st Road be widened to feet; 7) Thathe landscape plan co ly with Code and the evelopment text, subi to Staff VEngineer; at no new parking spa be installed for the to po office; at on - site turning vements for bu s circul ibe subject to appr al by the City and at the text be re sed to state that the exis ° g Post Road residence I aced adjacent to the stern propert ine will be demolished tth 30 days of receiving ceupancy for Phase ] but not later January 1, 1998. / 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Mr. Stri raised Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final p question about the num r of parking spaces and eir allocation to the ch ch Development Plan school and offs uses. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 April 10, 1995 19 Resolution No. 95 - A Resolution Aufho ng the City Manager to Huey aRight -of -Way Easement t Company Which he Columbus Southern wer Compa ill Provide Service to Dublinshi 7 through Reserve H of blinshire 6 Subdivision. nd Reading) Ms. Bo g asked if the utility lines I be underground, and Mr ndra responded that the ill be u ergrourd, re will be a third reading o e resolution at the April Council meeting. Resolution No. 07-95 - esolution Designating A 22 E it 17 through Ap Week in the City of Duhlin, Ohio d Declaring an Emerg (Second Reading) Mr. Hansley Hated at the Chairperson of the S d Waste Advisory Cammi (SWAG) is present this everting to dress Council. He added at Ashland Chemical, W ington Township Fire Department the Dublin City Schools a all working with the Cit of Dublin on EarthWeek activities. / Tim 116shbarger P Acting Chairper n of SWAG stated that April has been designated wor -wide as arth Day, and Dublin is ebrating EarthWeek for second consecutive year remind izens of the importance o aring for our environment Mr. Harshbarger a/Heatn ded copies to Council of , a 1994 update to the Ci Solid Waste Management Plan. ed Council for their on g support and acknowled Dana McDaniel and his staffs supp Committee's activi ' and Dublin's Solid Wast anagement Plan. Mrs. King mo to waive the three -time r ding rule and treat this as ergency legislation. W. Strip s nded the motion. V motion -Mrs. Stillwell, y Mme. Kranstuber, yes; Mr away, yes; Mrs. Boring ; Mr. S rp, yes; Mayor Campbell, ; Mrs. King, yes. n r I i - Mrs, ing, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes' s. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. g, yes; syor Campbell, yes; Mr. S ip, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, y Resolution No. 08 -95 ;A Resolution to Set ForthyStatement of Services to ovided to the Area in a Proposed oration of 21 +/- Acr rom Jerome Township, for, County to the City of Dublin, io as Required by Seri' n 709.031 of the Ohio vised Code. (Second Reading) Mr. Hansle oted that a map and a det ' etl memo from Mr. Foegle as contained in the pack so regardin a proposed annexation's istency with Council's ad ted interim annexation pol' Staff be requesting emergency tiara at the time of third r g to comply with the date the Uni County Commissioners' fng which is May 8, 199 There will be a third readi of the resolution ZeA 24 Council m eeting. Mayor Campbell n briefly explained the fo consent agenda it listed. Mr. Strip adA that under the Charter, r ings of the ordinances orsalutions can be dispensed with b/ao-thirds majority vote of cif. Ma Campbell then summariz at the agenda footnote in future will read that, "U two- ds vote of Council, the it identified as consent it ill be read by number o and the ppropriate action taken to spose of them." He added at any items can be remo from the consent agenda upon the est of any member of C cil. Ordinance No. 22- - An Ordinance Providi for a Change in Zonin or 9.893 Acres of Land Located o e North Side of Martin d, Approximately 150 F West of Krier Drive and Martin d from: PUD, Planned it Development District, PUD, Planned Unit Devettrict. (Martin Comm K)ilding (First Reading) Ordir opm Dis No. 23-95 - An Ordinance for a Change in Zoning for 14.114 Acres of Land Located on the Southeast Corner of I -270 and Rings Road from: R -1A, Restricted Suburban Residential District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. ( Chakeres Land Company) (First Reading) Ordinance No. 29-95 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Regulation of Traffic on Muirrield Drive and Other Roads in Muirrield Village During the Annual Memorial Tournament. (First Reading) Mr. Zawaly moved that Ordinance Nos. 22 -95, 23 -95 and 29 -95 be considered as consent agenda items; that Ordinance Nos. 22 -95, 23 -95 and 29 -95 be introduced; that Ordinance Nos. 22 -95 and 23 -95 be referred to Planning and Zoning Commission; and that Ordinance No. 29 -95 be held over 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Meeting ld April 10, 1 995 9 for a second reading; and that the reading of all three specified ordinances be waived. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes. Ordinance No. 95 - An Ordinance Ame Ong Section 929.06(h) oft Codified Ordinances Establishing a Capacity Charges fort Water System. (First Ke �syg) Mr. Zaw introduced the ordinance. Mr. H ey explained that a memo been provided to Council om Ms. Grigsby explainin e 2?,ari r this legislation which ad a capacity charge for taps ' excess of 6 inches. Th were ny left out of the las ate study. Staff is recomm ding that this ordinance an e next ce which involves r ted sewer capacity charges held over for second read' g. There will be a second r ing at the April 24 Counci Ming, Ordinance No. 25- - An Ordinance Amendi Section 925.03 @) of thedified Ordinances Establishing th apacity Charges for the er System. (First Rexdin Mr. Zawaly i oduced the ordinance. There will e a second read/d i124 Council meeting. f . Ordi rice No. 26-95 - An Authorizing the City/Manager to Sign a Coo floe A eement Between the Cbus and the City Dublin, Ohio for an Int ection iprovement at State Rou wmill Road. Vrst Reading) Mr. Strip introduced the dinanee. Mr. Hanley comment that this ordinance involy / cooperation between the ci ' of Dublin and Columbus on a ro improvement project. is requires Dublin's cons , as some of the improvement teedeif undertaken lies in the Cit .�f Dublin and Dublin will y for a portion of the proposed in ment. Staff is requestin at this be held over for s d reading. Mrs. King affected property ow rs are aware of the project Mr. H ey responded that the proj is in the design phase at thi time, but staff will notify e Sp ay gasoline station about impending project. rdlnance No. 27 -95 - An Q lnance Accepting the Low t and Best Bid for a New 5 d -Mount Seed/Mulch Sprayer and, Authorizing the City Mana7to Execute a Contract verning the Procurement of Said uipment. (First Reading) /equi p ment.S uber in aced the ordinance. y expl ed that Mr. Harding has prAdcd a detailed memo expl ' ing the need for this S will request emergency passage at the next reading d u the seasonal nature of s . e a second reading at the April 24 Council meeting. No. 28 - 95 - An r ce Authorizing the Par a of Outdoor Warning ssem ts Without Fo dvertising and Competifl Bidding Procedures, and acing an Emergency. (First ltea ng) Mrs. King introduced th ''urdinance. Mr. Hansley stated tt Mr. Harding has provid a detailed memo ex ' the need for this equipment and the for emergency action. • e Whalen Corporation is sole provider for the equipment whit must be compatible with current system. This co pany was awarded the contract by D I i and Franklin County a competitive process sev years ago. The purchase involves a ttional sirens and replacem of two that have malfuncti ed. It also provides for bac UP p discussed during the bu et sessions. The onset of a tornado season warrant e. timer ncy action requested this a Wing, &r. Strip asked for clarification about the malfun Mr. Hanley stated that both units were struck by Mrs. Boring sugg that a cap figure of the budgeted ajnpdnt of $70,000. and were covered by be included within the ornance, reaffirming W. suggested that the languag dried under the second "Whorea.s" would then be amend costs of these compone will exceed $10,000 but in no case will exceed the $70 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP moved to ame the ordinance to add langu a that the cost will not exc $70,( Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Mrs. King seconded the otian. Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CONIlIIISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 2, 1995 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regularly scheduled meeting: CASE 4: Rezoning Application Z94 -013 - Wheatley and Puckett Properties Location: 5.284 acres located on the south side of Rings Road approximately midway between Blazer Parkway and I -270. Existing Zoning: R -IA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Zoning). Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Proposed Use: Office uses, office related uses, and limited commercial uses. Applicant: The Edwards Land Company, c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application because the uses would be consistent with the potential development of the area, and the rezoning would expand the area controlled by the Tuttle Crossing to produce a coordinated high quality office site, promote traffic safety and be consistent with the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan with the following five conditions: 1) That the Development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District; 2) That right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 4) That wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management facilities; and 5) That a left -turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. * Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This rezoning application will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director 11- 034Z/PDP /FDP Rezoning /Prefiminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 2, 1995 Page 6 3. nditional Use /Cor 'dor Devel Square - All Ame 'can Brewin is case was poste ed without discus opment placation - CU 94 -0 /CDD94 -014 - Vi11 e g Com y - 6258 Riversi Drive si or vote. 4. Rezoning Application Z94 -013 - Wheatley and Puckett Properties Bobbie Clarke presented this rezoning application for two single - family properties located on the south side of Rings Road. Immediately to the south of this site is the Tuttle Crossing development, and to the north are the AT &T Training Center and Ashland Chemical. This application is to rezone 5.284 acres from R -IA, Restricted Suburban Residential to PCD, Planned Commerce District. The text submitted parallels the development standards within the Tuttle Crossing District at the interchange. The Planned Commerce District was devised specifically for commercially viable property, especially along the freeway. Staff believes that the PCD in this case is the appropriate district and it is one in which the developer makes commitments in the beginning. Staff is recommending approval of this rezoning application with the following five conditions: 1) That the Development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B r standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District; 2) That right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 4) That wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management facilities; and 5) That a left-turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. She said Staff had hoped to zone the whole strip of property at one time, but Staff believes this will set a good standard for the remaining parcels. Mr. Peplow asked if the revised text was consistent with Subarea B. Ms. Clarke said there were no principal issues, but some minor changes are needed. Mr. Sutphen and Mr. Fishman asked if Ashland Oil Company had reviewed the text. Ms. Clarke said no and they had not responded to the meeting notification. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, agreed to work with Staff to clarify the text as requested and agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Hale said the property owners were long time owners of the properties under contract with the Edwards Company. He said the Edwards Company had met with Jack Boston of Ashland Chemical over a year ago to discuss possible uses and was told office use would be preferred. Mr. Hale said he understood some 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - March 2, 1995 Page 7 improvements to the curb cut would be necessary for safety purposes, but he did not want it to be a terrific burden on this small property. Chris Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, representing the owners of the 14 -acre parcel immediately to the west owned by the Pagura Land Company, said they will be filing a rezoning application soon for PCD and anticipated using the Tuttle Crossing standards. He said they were supportive of this application and had the same concern for access. Mr. Sutphen supported the rezoning application because the uses would be consistent with the potential development of the area, expand the area of the Tuttle Crossing District for a coordinated high quality office site, promote traffic safety and the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Sutphen made the motion to approve the rezoning application with the following five conditions: 1) That the Development Text be revised to become essentially consistent with Subarea B standards of the adjacent Tuttle Crossing District; 2) That right -of -way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated by general warranty deed (40 feet from centerline) upon rezoning; 3) That all private streets, easements, utilities and storm water management facilities be designed consistent with the standards of the City of Dublin; 4) That wet basin(s) be utilized wherever possible for the storm water management facilities; and .• 5) That a left -turn lane and street lighting, consistent with City policy at entries, be installed by the developer along Rings Road. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) /Newc Application Z _ -002 - PreWninarry Development Ila - Northwest ian Church presente this rezoning appli io n for 14.59 acres cated on the northw t oad Avery/Muirfield ve. The current zo g is PUD, Planne nit Development Dis ' and R -1, Restricte uburban Residential istrict. The request zoning is PUD, Planne nit Development Di . ct for office and ' tutional uses. This uest is for expansion a odification of th xisting Lowell Tra Preliminary Devel ment Plan to include ,900 square foot urch/elementary scp of building and 27, square feet of offices e Concept Plan f this area was approved by the Commissio on January 5 1995. an y Council ZFeb 27, 1995. To the north s the Red T ue Nature Presery and then the Low - Frace subdivision. T the Conv rium at Indian Run. 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 1 i November 21, 1994 Held- Mr. Zaw responded that his mot€ is merely to refer this i can sen a memo to the Commiss` n regarding these concer shoul deviate from the process either referring or not re ri his otion. Sending a memo ill require consensus, per f the "consensus forums" eduled to begin in the n • futur e . ending a memorandum t Planning & Zoning Cum ession. Meeting 13 o manse. He believes that ouncil He does not believe Council ng them. He is not wi) ' g to amend baps this issue is an propriate one If there is cons us, he advocates I Mrs. Boring noted her interests are simply ' saving time for Plannin ommission as well as Council by Indic g Council's concerns a e outset. She ado Cat referring it to Plannin Commission wi instructions that the spec" is issues should be addr ed. Mr. Zawal esponded that this can be chieved with a memorand , but it would require co ensus on the co ent of the memo. Furthe he serves as Council's re esentative tZthers ission and he ill bring any concerns o 'ouncil members to the mmission. King commented that ouncil has demonstrated commitment ovebringing nsensus on issues in or to provide clear directi to staff. She belietillwell's amendment to the moti to refer would achieve s and provide a recoroncerns about the rezoning. r goal is to speed up the ocess and make it more Mayor Campbe] oted that the minutes o the Council meeting ca a forwarded to Planni Commission. a believes that adding C ncil's concerns as an ad ndum to the motion to r et could later misinterp/addressthe, 'ions imposed by Counc' . He believes that P] Wing C is entitled to sues they view s approp ate, and to then send the oposa back to uncif with tendations. Sending copy of the minutes t Planning scion would effecnicate Council memo concerns. to on the motion - Mr, yes; Mrs. Bori , no; Mayor Campbell, s; Mr. Zawaly, es; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; o. Ordinance No. 103 -94 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 5.284 Acres of Land Located on the South Side of Rings Road, Approximately Midway Between Blazer Parkway and I -270, from: R -IA, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Classification) to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Wheatley and Puckett properties) (Frst Reading) (Applicant: The Edwards Company c/o Ben Hale, Smith & Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215) Mayor Campbell introduced the ordinance and asked staff to provide a brief description of the rezoning. Ms. Clarke stated that maps have been distributed this evening as attachments to the rezonings. She stated that the two property owners on Rings Road are requesting rezoning for primarily office use. Mr. Kranstuber moved that the ordinance be referred to Planning & Zoning Commission. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Ordinance A. 104-94 - An Ordinan Providing for a Chang m Zoning for 54.787 A es of "and "d o ed on the North Side of 'ngs Road, Approximat 1,000 Feet West of I -2 from: 11, Rur Districl to: PCD, Plan Commerce District. ma /Ruscilli parcel) (Fir eading) Appli ant: The Edwards Comp y c/o Ben Hale, Smith ale, 37 W. Broad Str , Suite 725, Cojdmbus, OH 43215) Y's. King introduced the o finance. s. King moved that th ordinance be referred to arming & Zoning Comm sign. Mr. Kranstuber secon the motion. Vote on the motion - rs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. nstuber, yes; Mr. Zawal , yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Campbell, es; Mrs. King, yes. Ordinance N 105 -94 - An Ordinance oviding for a Change Zoning for 149.629 Acr of Land Doss► d on the North Side of -270, from Dublin -Belle int Road (SR 745) on t East to Coff n Road on the West, om: PUD, Planned U ' Development District t : Pi Plann Unit Development Dist el. (Revised McKitrick 270 Preliminary Develo ent PI 11- 034Z /PDP /FDP (Fir' Reading) (Applicant: ' e Edwards Company c/o en Hale, Smith & Hale 7 W. Br Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final S Suite 725, Columbu [7H 43215) D 1 t PI eve opmen an Kranstuber introduc the ordinance. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett - Atrium II Sign Plan 5455 & 5475 Rings Road PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF DISCUSSION CITY OF DUBLIN_ LWWUnWW JUNE 23, 2011 Low now ftnuis. 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin. Ohio 43016.1236 Phone / TDD: 614- 410.4600 Fax: 614- 410.4747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us Creating a Legacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PUD, Atrium II, Alcatel Lucent 5475 Rings Road 11- 033AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Proposal: A wall sign for a tenant located in north building of the Atrium II office complex within Chakeres Wheatley Puckett Planned Unit Development. The site is located on south side of Rings Road at the intersection of Atrium Parkway. Request: Review and approval of an amended final development plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Duke Realty; represented by Ben W. Hale Jr., Smith & Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4690, jrauch @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To approve this Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed sign is consistent with the approved development text and the amended final development plan requirements within the Zoning Code, with two conditions and one minor development text modification: Conditions: 1) The 1 -270 wall sign is limited to either black or blue copy, and white is an additional color allowed for the logo. 2) The channel fixtures of the letters be the same color as the copy. Minor Text Modification: 1) To limit the 1 -270 wall sign to either black or blue with white allowed as an additional color for the logo. *Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan and one text modification were approved. TAFF CERTIFICATION J ifer M. R uch, AICP Planner 11 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 19 3. Chakeres Wheatley Puckett PUD, Atrium II, Alcatel Lucent 5475 Rings Road 11- 033AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Ms. Amorose Groomes introduced the Amended Final Development Plan for a wall sign for a tenant located in north building of the Atrium II office complex within the Chakeres Wheatley Puckett Planned Unit Development. The site is located on south side of Rings Road at the intersection of Atrium Parkway. She said the Commission has final authority on an Amended Final Development Plan application. She swore in those intending to testify in regard to this application. Jennifer Rauch said the application is for the Alcatel Lucent tenant within the Atrium II office complex. She said the site is located on the south side of Rings Road, east of Interstate 270 and surrounded by office uses to the north, south and east. She said the site contains two buildings which are connected by a glass atrium; totaling 300,000 square feet, the buildings operate and are addressed independently. She said there are two large parking areas to the front and rear of the building. She said access to the site is provided off Rings Road with a right in and right out and a northern entrance drive and southern entrance drive off Atrium Parkway. Ms. Rauch said the site is a Planned District and has an approved development text with specific sign provisions, including three ground signs permitted along Rings Road and Atrium Parkway. She said one ground sign and one wall sign are permitted along Interstate 270 frontage. She said the wall sign is the subject of this application. She said on the agenda we are reviewing text changes for the overall sign plan for the office complex. She said this particular tenant will occupy the building before the sign plan and text changes would get through the review process. Ms. Rauch said the wall sign is provided for within the development text, but the specific provisions would default to the Zoning Code which would permit 300 square feet for a wall sign with individual channel letters of one color. She said the applicant is proposing an approximately 150 square foot sign, with three colors for individual channel letters. She said Planning is recommending modifying the design of the sign to be a single color to be consistent with the Code as well as other office signs along Interstate 270. She said the proposal meets conditions as outlined in the Planning Report. Ben Hale, representing Duke and Alcatel Lucent, stated Alcatel Lucent is taking up a considerable portion of the north building. He said the sign on the building is a legal sign, but the issue is the logo color. He said the applicant would like to have a sign of one color and the two -color logo on the building. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if anyone would like to speak in respect to the application. [There were no comments.] Ms. Kramb asked if white is considered the third color. Ms. Rauch confirmed. Ms. Kramb said the logo could blue or black with white and the letters could be the same blue or black. Mr. Zimmerman asked if other companies along Interstate 270 had one color for their logo. Ms. Rauch said IGS and Verizon have two -tone logos and they had to design a single color for their logo and text for the 1 -270 wall signs. She said it is consistent for all wall signs along Interstate 270 to have a single color. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 19 Mr. Hale said if the logo is made black and cut out all that will be seen is the white behind it, and it would blend in with the building. Mr. Budde said he does not have a problem with the white in the logo. Mr. Fishman said the other businesses had to meet Code and this business should not be different. He said he does not want to set a precedent because everyone will want more colors on their 1 -270 signs. Mr. Hardt said from the artistic standpoint he agrees with Ms. Kramb. He said he is concerned if the applicant left the script A open it becomes a place for birds' nests. He said the next case on the agenda is where the zoning text is being modified for this building, which would implement requirements for this site. Mr. Amorose Groomes said it is two separate buildings. Ms. Rauch said if the Commission would decide to permit two colors, a text modification could be made to grant the applicant's request. Jennifer Readier said this is unusual in that this board would be granting a minor modification to the text first. She said if Council did not recognize it in rezoning, then Council could change it and the future tenant would not have the same sign option. Mr. Taylor said corporate identity is important and he cannot come up with a way to have the logo and the circle in the A and not have it two colors. He said as soon as the sun shines on the A the shadows are going to cover it up so it would be ineffective as a logo. He said he thinks the solution is what Ms. Kramb suggested. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that Ms. Kramb's idea is a suitable solution to her too. She said Code modifications were discussed in regards to colors and it is a difficult situation. She said if it were all black or blue the sign would be suitable. Mr. Hardt said the fact that one of the colors is white matters. Mr. Zimmerman said if the corporate citizens along Interstate 270 come back to this Commission for modifications on their signage, would they feel the same way because it is white. He said this Commission has required other buildings to follow the Code, this building should not be an exception. Mr. Taylor said the IGS logo does not change the nature of the logo by making it one color. Mr: Zimmerman said he understands the importance of logo and colors. He said he is looking at this application in terms of consistency for all 1 -270 signs. Mr. Fishman asked if it will be black or blue. Ms. Kramb said either would be fine. Roger Hines, 5084 Turner Close, New Albany 42054, said he would like to follow the recommendation of the Commission. He said he will take back whatever color choices he is given. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 23, 2011 - Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 19 Amy D'Amore, Duke Realty, 5600 Blazer Parkway Suite 100, Dublin, said she wants to be sure the color selected is consistent for all of the signs that would apply to this property. Ms. Kramb said the white would be on the logo and either all black or all blue. Mr. Langworthy said if we want the white be specific to the logo, then for future signs it would only be specific to the logo not part of the lettering. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would like to see all the fixtures associated with the sign to be the same color to avoid accidently introducing a third color. Mr. Fishman asked how this is not going to set a precedent. Ms. Kramb said because the Commission is stating the white is a lack of color and it is impossible for them to use their logo without the white, it is okay to use white only in their logo. Jennifer Readier said the decision will not set a legal precedent, these are Planned Developments dealing with specific situations. She said there can always be a different decision made for a different property. She said there is nothing legally binding you to this decision for future signs. Mr. Fishman said when the next tenant comes in they will not have the same right for their sign and will have to come back to this Commission. Ms. Readier said yes. Ms. Amorose Groomes reiterated the application requires two motions, one for the text medication and one for the amended final development plan. She asked for a motion for the text modification. Motion #1 and Vote - Minor Text Modification Ms. Kramb made the motion to approve the text modification because it meets the applicable criteria with the one condition. 1. To limit the 1 -270 wall sign to either black or blue, with white allowed as an additional color for the logo. Mr. Zimmerman seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes and Mr. Budde, yes. (Approved 7 - 0.) Motion #2 and Vote - Amended Final Development Plan Ms. Kramb made the motion to approve the Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed sign is consistent with the modified development text, and the amended final development plan criteria with the two conditions: 1. The 1 -270 wall sign is limited to either black or blue copy, and white is an additional color allowed for the logo. 2. The channel fixtures of the letter be the same as the color copy. Mr. Hale agreed to the condition. Mr. Zimmerman seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes and Mr. Budde, yes. (Approved 7 - 0.)