The URL can be used to link to this page

Ordinance 36-10RECORD OF ORDINANCES 'ton Legal Blank. Inc. 1'U III 11V. _!104_ 36 -10 Ordinance No. Passed 1 20 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 28.42 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PERIMETER DRIVE, WEST OF AVERY - MUIRFIELD DRIVE AND NORTHWEST OF HOSPITAL DRIVE FROM PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT (RIVERSIDE PLAN, SUBAREAS B AND B1) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (AVERY SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER/KROGER —CASE 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU) NOW, THERERE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of its elected members concurring: Section 1 . That the following described real estate (see attached legal description marked Exhibit "A ") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2 . That application, Exhibit `B ", including the list of contiguous and effected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C ", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this 6-gi day of CJ at"alo e 1/ , 2010. z/ a c5fzalel�L Mayor - P esi ing Officer ATTEST: Clerk of Council Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OI-I 43017 -1090 CITY OF DUBLIN.. Phone: 614 -410 -4400 • Fax: 614 -410 -4490 To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha Grigsby, Interim City Manager Date: October 21, 2010 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use and Long Range Planning Memo Re: Ordinance 36 -10 — Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan — Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B I — Avery Square Shopping Center /Kroger, 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive and 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive (Case No. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU) Summary Ordinance 36 -10 was introduced at the October 11, 2010 City Council meeting. The ordinance is a request for review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan for 28.42 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside PCD, Subareas B and 131) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square PUD). If approved, the rezoning would permit the addition of a fuel station for the Kroger grocery store (as a conditional use), establish an area for a future outparcel, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center, install two center identification signs, and account for future driveway and access improvements. The concerns raised by Council members are addressed as follow: Development 'Text Council members raised concerns about the lack of Council input and review if a potential future outparcel is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a final or amended final development plan/conditional use application as indicated on the preliminary development plan. The applicant has worked with Planning and the Law Director to revise the text to require a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to City Council regarding an application for an outparcel. The proposed language gives City Council the jurisdiction over the final details of an outparcel on the site. The text has also been revised to include language regarding the applicant's commitment to dedicate right -of -way to the City for the planned intersection improvements surrounding the site. (A redline version of the proposed text is included in addition to the clean version.) Fuel Station Architecture The applicant has revised the plans to show rectangular columns for the fuel station canopy. The columns are proposed at 3'6" by 4'6 ", which is wider than the columns at the Shell station on Perimeter Loop Road. Vehicle Stacking at Wencly's %Tim Hortons While the planned improvements to the Hospital Drive entry to the site provide for a much longer approach to the Wendy's /Tim Hortons restaurant than what is currently in place, the applicant has revised the plans to include a dedicated eastbound, right -turn lane for Wendy's /Tim Hortons to separate Metno re. Second Reading of Ordinance 36 -10 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Avery Square Shopping Center /Kroger October 21, 2010 Page 2 of 2 stacked vehicles from vehicles travelling through the site. This will also allow drivers not visiting the restaurant to bypass vehicles waiting for drive -thru service. Pedestrian /Cyclist Connections Council members were concerned with pedestrian and cyclist connections to and interior to the site. The applicant has provided an exhibit (see attached Connectivity Exhibit) that indicates all existing paths connecting the site to the public bikepaths and sidewalks and the locations of proposed crosswalks and proposed bike racks. The applicant is also planning to implement the shanrows (bicycle and arrow pavement markings) suggested by Engineering to provide safe routes for bicyclists traveling through the site and to the bike racks. The intent is for patrons arriving on bikes to easily access the bike racks. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 36 -10 at the second reading/public hearing on October 25, 2010. LOCATION MAP N, 5 I, r PNoP ' DUBLIN DIME, LTD. I ynl� s ";]WO PERIMETER LOOP Q V x 116 Parkin ' tll a VVV ' AVERY ROAD ..a.___ d RETAIL CENTER 4 SECTION t LOT 2 a 2 fl 105 AC 5 FUTURE OUTPARCEL i ZONED PCD - -., 133 ACRES •� ` l - 39J P Spacesln Wesuialf Il J6 Parking Spaces M PNOP. FUEL CENTER 3 / / Sli ffON 1 l y 1EOrJ FNS J 1]i' 6 ZONED ROD ME I, PAINT M ARROW PAINT MARKING — i IF � ,rmr ° s F t KROGER N 81 : BY STORE Re11Q rLO� eo . DR NarN. o .. V -F A Ir . Q �IMMMN AV G 6 � IMP Wei L, 18 VERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER DUBLIN, OHIO Bird +Bull rTH NECTIVITY EXHIBIT SA n. o]ui']s'� L a 1B � II. L lw.gs ]] qq 61TE t 0]•]Y'45 —T _ @� L a ]9.] SBJM'S] "E NHSS'N 8 -- � - FX "` arNU[rtn anrvE IXREIEIIfIgI I \I I RLIPETYL c \ PoaO n,eelss FePmx RUllmr ` , iLvc wux .wrs PAT Na Sw I ` \ \\ LOC A TION saes 1zm lag n' ' �I +erg I lrl�l�l , ng; e I PROP. rWS SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION -- i 1pp OK f I � l i�isi PROP. BIKE I n;i °/i u I ZONING: PROPERTYOWNER: RETAL HOPPFI TG. OLSEN 9 f S ti I I E PROPERTY USE(LOT 2): NGCENIER - -- - - - - 'll out i• �i I A PROPERTY USE (LOT 3): GROCERY STORE ( 1 I 1 1 I I 1 _ 2d s.uJUS SITE ACREAGE (LOT 2): 15.05 AC. 9i r -- r �, f 1 SITE ACREAGE LOT 3: 10.21 AC. J I I i _ _____ __- � I SITE ACREAGE (TOTAL): 25.26 PC. DUBUN OAKS. ETD, �PAT {(}� 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' � 111: I� TP M � T � R � ��J �: •iiii+rl �LLL. WISw .'. •. :,AAA I EXISTI ZONI NG: PUD NG: PUD \ I n 1 \I 1IA deVkin9 $pee✓tR° PROPOSEDZONING i A' I�ag & °rexg seuon ADJACENT ZONING NORTH: PCD W � I«+ ` I � W wwl� NT ZONING SOUTH: PUD IXREWL 9 ly {UI' �. ADJACE 3 1 ADJACENT ZONING EAST: PUD "�`� " "' "" y ADJACENT ZONING WEST: PUD W I a...yy + r I-rrr ' A,,ERYROADRETAILCENTER i $ "" `, \.,• �I K P. CROB SITE LAYOUT DATA. $ �L h Ly1 N1 MINIMUM EXISTING DRIVE �IIP x.h.x.. ti - w _ W AISLEWIDTH: 22' __ - lVJ 1 S,p8 V FUTURE OUTPARCEL ` 1 F �-' STANDARD PARKING STALL: 9.5'a 19.5' it ZONED PCD T 133 ACRES I' _ at u T - v PARKING SETRACK I BUFFER: 26130' I(� .. is `_ 2 o ] Irt s LOT a D I I IW a BUILDING SETBACK: 50' PROP. BUILDINGS. F.: 1201 II 393 /u n9Sge� sin Wert HBB S - I ADDIIIQWLGREBJSPACE .. m iii (FUEL IKPRCA MENTS ONLY] 14,205 S.F. J 1111 VIII _ __ I ADDRIO A ENSPACE UTID r� J o °•• -° �'�' 4„ se } � ) �( GRNE NYRDVEMENTSk 39.087&F. i • °• ~• sGrls'ae"w-••• - P q -059,19 5 IL, '15'00 E n 92' d.• = " ' _ �y.0� ¢ - e- e30'ss - - _ - 021E S N3TY]E 0 30.92' 9 02 W fAe3' B — E%. BIKE .I l i l ii Ili RACK ce„a1 G0 �. ��/ ', '�llt� -- �� ' �� t umumn n - I=2 1 3 P' II x I 919n , P -51 L - 111.,3 1 N S 362 Palling 90acVS 9W a a1L5 2 Y Ln -no,e, e I A t • s snrT3]'w 1 O i Q -L 559'51'2 W 2]3 -0100]2 ed EXISTING KROGER N -819 I U I I I I I \ ) g o WALGREEN CO. jly \�j I GROCERY STORE 11 / / / f \ 8008 HOSPRAL DRNE 1 A,f &LCxe WV40NPV0V60WGI PROP FVEL LFNIER Q / - E:'u ZONED PCD G 11 paBMN.F.. SECTION I A @ 1 ; 1 \ Jfw xosPRPL CPgIFeICLIx 0X10 O O LO b9LOB209 / suc r .m k .. r r / / / _ PARKING TABLE „1 ± ,021 AC. - S 1b .4 Q DESCRal nEWIRED MAILED Al ar. �i 1 R �l Datal 1 sF) 1,135 L2D5 D /111) s.IIFA R 1GDD Sr. 11 20NED PCO p15x IXO CENJaN i - - -_ ( O O ,.; • Q F W A 9$ 1 r e- N'Al'39• ,U RN k pTN.DE 1,136 III (1/23]) 412 PER 1000 s 1. 11 __ __ PROP. �P P. I T ` I�Y1` ' I I '� R - RJ. CHANGES - 9URAlta L _ BIKE RICK 3 L' 20015) 51. 9 tl2J101W CITY M WBILI PAN IHG CWE 1. FUDRD. 151212 - 5.5 PER 1 WO 4F. nv Date : l U�, A l l p, THEAVERY RDAD RETAIL CENTER It lrs ------ - - - - -- - - - -- umlm -' DUBLIN, OHIO AauRmD 1 _ i BirduB .,.c. - eas.ae l Ho PRAL PROPERnes sscnoN Z, _- -i ; cR.BUD. .. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT ----------- nONPLRT'OFPERIMETER II -� IXw11% II II SWAl1C PEI Ill ZmM9 Lwnmlalan 3mimy. UN. Pn�W9°n %m PLAN 1 - L PR ND THE RESUBB� ❑ - -"-- ens w.Pi4D°-0mvOWR°M Lnl`I Tt T PROP S _ .. t_ uewaw,ael°a>u3 I .8.1E,PG. Fu: SCAIE: I " -80' JOB NO. -- -- Imning and Zming CdnmaI All Daft pill DVM:54 ; AA9 OAIE 10 IB 0 0 }000 D1'S v 90 ' Gi CR 20'3W On' .89 1 1 \ PieP I IL - IBBb. I g F%.PRNL I ' I ° �' Pouo� ' ' i �u.9as px�em1 w1w1�11 1\ LOCATION MAP 1. xo m. 1 NO. iaao 1 1. I 'i � I 'i 9 'i (� i � � rr� r �I ,�- ` 917E DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION `i iI rM0 I' . d fI i/ DU s3gO BONE iiis'I 10N I �' R • _ _ PROPERTY OWNER: ELIN OAKS, LTD. ii ---- m9 - - -- - 9 'i 3] zDt -� PROPERTY USE (LOT 2): RETAILSHOPPINGCEtJ1Ef2 G Iwrtor'A• 1 PROPERTY USE LOT 3): GROCERY STORE II - -!- __ _��_____� is A Pa%. OxE 1 161 AGR6B I,! SITE ACREAGE (LOT 2): 15.05 AC. C. , ,� r a� (\ '1 SITE ACREAGE (LOT 3): 10.21 AC. fl 1 II DUBLIN OAKS LTD. tirf9 � \\ �� ' 1 SITE ACREAGE (TOTAL): 25.26 AC. 1 ]oAa PEwMETER LbbF (� (� , , , , . \ EXISTING ZONING: PUD PROPOSED ZONING: PCD U U 4+ x v z �, �) ADJACENT ZONING NORTH: PCD ADJACENT ZONING SOUTH: PUD ex.PSiuL n I I PUD ADJACENT ZO WEST: PUD ADJACENT ZO 277.]5 a NING EAST: 0... -Fhhri r�iii♦iy rfhhl-h +iiii- 1'i-I� w J1 R U ILII :: LLff R xis' Be�.R PaxIw?v'd°�' A NING F AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER 1 E ^' �� ,`° \ \..• fil K a n SECTION 1 F1 //�� n roroggee 2z 1 a ` ` ( ' SITE LAYOUT DATA. ] I L _O II II J L L. i� _ - 5 MINIMUM EXISTING DRIVE U U U U U II B. AISLE WIDTH: 22' - - - - - -- 45 b3 AC STANDARD PARKING STALL: 9.5x19.5' III ZONED POD - -- E PARKING SETBACK I BUFFER: 26' 130' n 07 Illlil: li::li:: e BUI NG SETBACK: 50' IMAGRE I* \ ° PROP. BUILDINGS. F.: 1203 r i AOpD GREEN I n B tH I _ � 11 ��`� ( MPROVENff1JJT30NLVr 14,205 B.F. a"- 'l ,u �� VIII 392 PakJ eePOwsln WMt H91f� 2Bt1 i aeln l eft J -- ewh ee \1 (ALMA DM/EI P MPRWFh£NBj 30758S.F. �i �rrrti O 111111 m. w 1a33 P Eaxmem 7 ° /• Crlw - PB05 P'S'BW — - 8020'35" 6 _ 0.5'00 E e.@' ] __ -- a fA5 �r fl1 q L XY"W _ R . 50.N _ A.05 ... . it IAS.50 1 27.02 fl ��'ar / _� 1 5 BJICA' E orn III 2092 S 02' 5t6' W L MUD' • � _ TU H IA6i' an . 1GO.nr ?" RACK 1 1 � ' PI r+ a IIIV/1I Prcp. l iP, / d� 6`5]'51' A- 15'05'15' I FD 3 y' i Nmumnt P= LIAO' R- '� 1 e - y PeOP. u Sign / L e 51.05' P Lx - 51.02 p 11001 �{ ¢ �t �4 + � R9v nTnY]]•W - EXISTING JJJ G KROGER N -817 I ] ' OxR� ti t b xA °� WI BENOD. 6 r I S GROCERY STORE 1 i � r / 0 ; "W 2T30161J2 HOSPITALDRNE -rg bll -- BRIIXaN0.50NRV 6UILwxO ' 362 Pe1MNR SIDwOns %LOp.NELGENIER r _. -- L.. ZONEDPCD 1 r 7 BB,SMlaP' 9ECTION..1 ry r i - IwXLmliuP%+6 Weux.oNlO �y PARKING TABLE A 27 ON20 0WP09 #L 1021 AC. p Y'A a I /l Ij _ OESCRRiION REWIRED PROV10E➢ RATIO ZONED PCD Bill je ^ ( ll 0 r DL SHOPPING DENIER S.i) I.ISS 1331 (1/10]7 10.2 PER 1LaD sE. TlUlr x' fi 0 $m. B LE DH A - 5 GF Ix6 W/ xEw NEL IDSF F Nf' I 8'1S'}q' NIER EHIRAXLE I 1,1}8 1,015 (1,103) 0.92 PER 1Ma SF. 1 POOP. CART NI eY M}K' I� P - 597.05' CHANCES COCRA_ 9 3BCM1 - 3711,07 CITY Ci DUBpN PARNMO CODE PER $EC1IW 75J.9R - 5.5 PI 1000 SI. b 1 1 1 1 1 'D1 W — ' I r^� -�- - -- E$.y�,e1 , Pnp. P�_e/ e Y THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER (IIII - YY��tltlaa „ " e I9AJ p — um. DUBLIN, OHIO Eae ent , � za' x 90'p _ % a Aqe �� APPlu.ne Om.: ' Ds1 DDBZJ __ _ __ ______ t______ ____ _ __ __P ^_mc "ee__mimeu ________ __ s -- Blyd +BUII PI FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN _____ TgL PROPER TIES SECTION 2, lO ' utnny aae en zR�e- - 11 -' -_T PlalmeamezPem9 FOR cemmww "sxamax Dub: "�e.� PLAFOFPERIMEIER ' o.P. me 6. p. 01 II I "" Jnsw. Dm9e0neNle Rem ^WeWian 1 ..50WOS. 1 9 - - L P P ROP S RESU KROGER N817 FUEL CENTER 52] -- - G 6l➢5 20 t x IDD' P ROP - _ . <ap7m.1661 iEB, PG. RE lE -- - vv:(uapeblID Shcf: t' - 00' MR 060 No. RE - - %.IlnFq me 3onHq wnmlwbn AppravW. Dots ONPrSG LIfO: MG OA 10 B 0 OS 1 C1.6 $HINGLFSN MATCH STOPS 12 O ED, EIFSTOWTCHSTOHE W POOf TOPUNIT OGMM 00 12 00 �16 W ,16 SPICKCOWMNS �.. TG Al4TCH$iGPE BwCI(ro s NVITCH W roxfro MATCHSroPE r SPILLKIi iMSX PECEPTACLE (IYP) ENCLOSUNE Z LEFi( SOUTH )ELEVATION n RIGHT(NORTH)ELEVATION R SHINGLESTOWITLHSTDRE BRILKCOLUNNS EIf5N M4TCM SiOPE iO M4TCHSttIflE sHINGLE6TO AMTC115fOPE EIFSTOWTCH5T01E BRONTOMATCHSTOHE STONE TO M ATCH EE E S EMOTE SLflE ON ENClA51AE n FRONT(EASTIELEVATION z 0 sa•v 2aa > w sHwaEero w<ATGHSmflE ,Ix W e ea W EIFSTO MATCH SttIflE 2 BPICKCOwVNS TOW POOFTOPUNR $ 'JUE,: EERNLEI G ON b w IN STONETOWTCH N r STOPS �.T. tl b. DUE DENNEED FEE nn n NUNENEI W N817 (� REAR (WEST) ELEVATION � , „ NU W RE , T R I .w ,o 4, N TER I IXIFAIOHELEDATION FD DDETROJEUTRADEREIREJENDIDENEDNED—U.—I- RUERNETEUR OF THE - ANOSIGNAGE 817 REO` o 3 +2(RTU) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) Avery Square Approved 1 2010 This following text supersedes the original Riverside Dublin Development Text for former Subareas B and B (Avery Square Shopping Center). The Riverside Dublin Development Text for Subarea B (Walgreen's) shall remain in effect until such time it is amended. Retail Center 2 5. 1 ac. The retail center is located south of Perimeter Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. The Dublin Methodist Hospital property is located to the south and west of the retail center. This area contains a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment typical in size to a small community center. Upon application for a conditional use, a final development plan or an amended final development plan that contemplates the development of the outparcel delineated in the Preliminary Development Plan ( "the Applications) "), the Planning and Zoning Commission shall first provide a recommendation to Citv Council under the criteria for each respective Application set forth in the Dublin Codified Ordinances. City Council shall review the Application(s) on the following terms: A. Following the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the Application(s), Citv Council shall hold apublic hearing, which shall be held no later than the date that is 30 days following the Planning and Zoning Commission's vote on the Application(s), unless an extended time is agreed upon by City Council and the applicant. In the event that Citv Council has no meetings scheduled during this 30-day t� period, then City Council shall hold the public hearing and vote on the Application(s) at the first regularly scheduled Citv Council meeting following the expiration of the 30 -dav period contemplated in the preceding sentence. B. City Council shall vote to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the Application(s). In reviewing the Application(s), Citv Council shall use the review criteria for each respective Application set forth in the Dublin Codified Ordinances, City Council shall act through a majority vote of those City Council members that are present at the meeting in which the Application(s) are presented. Citv Council's PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) vote shall become afinal appealable order and the applicant shall have 30 days from the date of Citv Council's vote to file an administrative appeal pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Chapter 2506. Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels 4 ac. Retail outparcels located along Avery Muirfield Drive, south of Perimeter Drive and north of Hospital Drive. Uses and architecture will be integrated into the retail center. Development Standards for Retail Center and Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels General 1. If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Unit Development District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Unit Development District. The revised access plan shown on the preliminary development plan is the general scheme to be constructed with the planned intersection improvements at Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive and Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive. It is not however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be preserved, its precise location may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. The final access design is dependent on the City of Dublin's Hospital Drive /Avery Muirfield Drive intersection improvements. Provided the final access design is in substantially the same form as that shown on the approved preliminary development plan, the retail center owner will donate all reasonable right- of -wav required for the construction of the intersection improvements at no cost to the Citv of Dublin. 2. Signage and Graphics: a. All signage and graphics shall conform to the Dublin Zoning Code except as provided by this text, and except as provided for in the Signage Criteria and approved as part of the Final Development Plan. 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) b. The Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels ground supported signage shall reflect a uniform shape and shall be set in a frame of dark brown, black or bronze color. The center identification signs shall have the letters attached to an aluminum plaque. C. All uses within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall have signage of uniform size, shape and materials, sign bases shall be made of stone. These signs shall have a maximum height of 6' and contain no more than 50 SF of area per face. Landscaping shall be integrated into signage feature. d. All uses within Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be allowed two ground signs, one sign oriented toward Avery Muirfield Drive and one sign oriented toward either a second public street (provided the site has at least 100 feet of frontage on two public streets) or the internal access road on the west side. e. No building mounted signs will be allowed along Avery Muirfield Drive frontage. The retail center shall be permitted two overall center identification signs, one located along Perimeter Drive and one located along Hospital Drive customer entrance. Sign bases shall reflect similar materials to the building architecture. All building mounted signage should conform to Dublin Signage Code except as provided herein and reflect a common shape, size, material and base color. g. No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence except as provided herein or as permitted as tenant's main identification sign under the " Signage and Graphics" section of the Retail Center herein. No wall murals shall be allowed. h. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. i. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. j. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. k. On site permanent directional sign, e.g. employee and visitor parking, deliveries, etc. will be of a common design, material and size must meet signage standards. Fuel pump identification signs (numbers only) at the fuel station shall be permitted. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) 4. Lighting: a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff type fixtures. b. All parking, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be form the same type and style. C. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall be constructed of dark wood, or dark brown, black or bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28'. e. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. 5. Miscellaneous: a. All bike racks must have two lock -up positions. b. If used, bollards on the site must be painted to match the building colors. Retail Center Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Retail Center: a) Those uses listed in the Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial District of the Zoning Code. C) Outdoor Dining Areas with up to 3,000 total sq. ft. of seating space within the retail center area that can be allotted to the various tenants to be administratively approved 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) by Land Use and Long Range Planning. Those outdoor dining areas shall employ matching amenities (fences, tables, chairs, flower boxes) and must be of a black, wrought -iron design consistent with the patios which have been approved for the center. All patio materials (e.g., tables, chairs, etc.) must be removed from the patio area from November 1 to April 1. Such materials cannot be stored outside at the center. d) Outdoor Display Area for Live Plant Material as regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code. Conditional Uses The following uses shall be allowed within the Planned Development subject to additional review and approval as prescribed by the Dublin Zoning Code: a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Theaters. C) Fuel station which shall be owned by the grocery store at the shopping center and its subsidiaries. d) Outdoor Dining Areas that do not meet the requirements listed above. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Perimeter Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 30', building setbacks 50'. 2. Along the Hospital Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. 3. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. Total building square footage permitted per acre shall not exceed 10,000 square feet. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) Utilities: 1. All utility lines including water supply, sanitary sewer service, electricity, telephone and fuel, and their connections or feeder lines should be placed underground. 2. All utility connections should be kept to the rear or the side of the building, out of view or screened. 3. All mechanical equipment and related structures should be effectively screened from grade level view as well as on site views from within the development. 4. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened form public view with materials harmonious with the building. Circulation: 1. Opposing curb cuts on the Perimeter Drive and the Hospital Drive shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices. Parking: In addition to meeting the current City of Dublin code requirements, the following requirements should be followed in the design of parking facilities. 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code unless otherwise noted herein. 2. Parking shall be provided at 4 spaces per every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the buildings. 3. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate aminimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 4. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Dublin Zoning Code. 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) 5. Fuel station stacking shall accommodate a minimum of three spaces per pump. 6. Parking stalls shall be laid out in the most efficient manner; 90 degree layouts are suggested with 9' x 19' stall and 22' - 24' aisles. No parking shall be permitted on either the Perimeter Drive or Hospital Drive. 8. Curb cuts shall be permitted as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. 9. Where slopes occur that exceed 3:1, the area shall be terraced or treated with erosion control materials, shrubs or ground cover. Materials which will roll, wash or float away are to be avoided on these slopes. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Service: 1. All loading activity shall occur within a building. 2. No noises, smoke, odors, vibrations or other nuisances shall be permitted. 3. No area of the site will be used for outdoor storage. 4. Service courts and loading docks shall be screened from all streets by landscaping, mounding or walls. 5. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure, except as provided for in Section 6 of General Conditions herein, as approved as part of an outdoor live plant display area 7 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) Landscaping: 1. Along Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive, a 3' to 4' high landscape mound shall be provided with street trees planted 50' on center, within the right -of -way and planted 1' from the right -of -way line. 2. The rear of all buildings or structures shall be screened with planting, hedge, fence, wall or earth mound to provide a minimum of 50% winter opacity and 70% summer opacity, between 1' above finish level and 6' in height. 3. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2 1/2" caliper for shade trees, 6' to 8' height for evergreen and 1" to 1 1/2" caliper for ornamentals. General Conditions 1. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be seeded. 2. Street trees on each side of an entry drive shall be set back twenty (20) feet from the curb to accentuate the entry /exit points. 3. A minimum greenbelt of ten (10) feet shall be maintained along each adjoining property line. 4. Shrub plantings are recommended masses or clustered in beds rather than singular shrub plantings. 5. Site unity can be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade trees, evergreen trees and ornamental trees). New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. 6. No outdoor display area around the fuel facility sales kiosk or the fuel pumps shall be permitted. 7. In the event that the fuel station is closed for aperiod of 180 days and such closure is not a result of a force maj cure event or as part of a renovation/redevelopment of the station, the kiosk, canopy, pumps, and underground tanks shall be removed from the PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) site and the pavement and landscaping shall be restored in a manner consistent with the current parking field. Architecture Height: A. No outparcel structure shall be more than 28' in height. For structures with pitched roofs, this height limit will be measured to the roof peak. B. Height limit for the retail center will be 35'. Color Palette: A. Earth tones, muted and natural tones are preferred. Accent colors in brighter hues such as white are permitted for building accent features only. A mixed palette on a single building should be carefully selected so all colors harmonize with each other. Materials: A. Warm -tone brick. B. White brick can be used as accent. C. Slate or synthetic slate roofing material. D. Split -face concrete block or pre -cast concrete used as an accent with dark brick only. E. Stone veneer with limestone trim (limestone rubble in a coarse ashlar pattern). F. Stucco when accented with brick or stone. Roof: A. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are suggested with a slope equal to 8/12. 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) B. Minimum 8" overhangs are suggested. C. Glass roofs are acceptable in portions of a structure. D. Mansard roofs are permitted. E. Flat roofs are permitted if architecturally coordinated and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scale: A. The scale of the structures should be sympathetic to a residential character. B. Structures should be designed to harmonize with the landscape. C. The scale of each building can be aidedthroughthe use of articulated building elements such as porticoes, dormers, recesses and other such elements which help break up the mass and bring it into a more residential character. Wall Articulation/Fenestration: A. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. B. Blank facades on the "rear" of the building will not be permitted, articulating such facades with recesses, fenestration, fences, pilasters, etc. is encouraged. C. The amount of fenestration should be balanced with the amount of solid facade. D. With the exception of enclosed service corridors, the buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. Signage and Graphics 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) All signs shall comply with the sign code unless varied by this text or accompanying drawings. A. Main Identification Signs: 1. A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 8 feet in height on Hospital Drive, 8 feet in height on Perimeter Drive, and 18 feet in width, with a maximum each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 42 square feet per sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail tenant signage materials and colors. 2. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. 3. There will be no project identification sign located adjacent to Avery Muirfield Drive. B. All signs shall meet the following elements: 1. All wall and projecting signage shall meet the City Sign Code relative to permitted sign face area and that wall signs not exceed 15 feet in height, except as noted. a. Wall sign for the major tenant: will be a maximum of 22' 0" above finished walkway. b. The following maximum tenant sign heights are permitted: 7044 -7052 Hospital Drive; 20 feet: 6545 -6459 Perimeter Drive: 20 feet; 6415 -6435 Perimeter Drive: 18 feet. 2. Each tenant store front shall be limited to one wall sign, and one projecting sign. Wall sign faces shall not exceed one square foot in area of each one lineal foot in store frontage not to exceed 80 square feet, except in the case of the major tenant. (See Section 3 below). Projecting sign faces shall not exceed three square feet in area. 3. The major tenant shall be permitted signage of an individual nature within the center with a maximum area of 109 square feet. The letters shall be internally illuminated with "white" plastic faces. An individual tenant may select any one of the sign colors from the approved sign palette for a tenant wall sign. 11 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) 4. Each tenant space may have one (1) projecting sign of uniform size and design, as illustrated by the accompanying drawing. Background color of projecting sign shall match letter color of that particular tenant's wall sign. 5. The signs will be externally illuminated, except for the major tenant, by gooseneck light fixtures. The gooseneck fixtures will be comprised of the same exterior finish and color, subject to staff approval. 6. The color of wall signs and projecting signs shall be selected from following sign palette, or a compatible color approved by LULRP: a) Martin - Senour Market Square Tavern Dark Green W85 -0620. b) Martin - Senour Palace Arms Red W1083. c) Martin - Senour Benjamin Powell House Green W85 -1089. d) Sherwin Williams Palais White SW -2429. e) Sherwin Williams Obsidian (Dark Blue) SW2738. I) Sherwin Williams Amethyst SW2703. g) Sherwin Williams Bonfire SW2321. The fuel station shall be entitled to one monument sign as approved with the Final Development Plan. The monument sign shall not exceed 6 feet in height and 9 feet in width. No signage or TV screens shall be permitted on the building, pumps or canopy, except as required by law. Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels: a) Those uses listed in Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial District of the Zoning Code. Conditional Uses a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Outdoor Dining Areas. 12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) General The orientation and the face of the out parcels will be to the west and at the corners toward the intersecting streets and to what would normally be considered the rear of those parcels, (i.e. the portion abutting Avery Muirfield Drive will be employed as an entrance feature to the residential areas to the north). Buildings will have a common architectural theme with good aesthetic quality, the same or compatible building materials and a common lighting, signage and landscaping ethic. Within this mold the west, and intersecting street faces may identify the separate users and their products with appropriate expressions of individuality. However the east face must appear as a unified, single expression. Structures, be they buildings or walls, roof lines and types, building spacing, signage lighting and landscaping should present an almost non-commercial approach with low level signage employed solely to identify users and structures and landscaping effectively shielding the street from the impact of activity on the site. The following additional standards are deemed appropriate to produce such afunction. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the right to review all applications for their architectural consistency. Additional materials and colors may be approved by Commission if they are consistent with other building materials and add to the overall architectural quality. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. The setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be 45' for pavement and 65' for buildings. 2. Setback from Hospital Drive will be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings 3. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be at least 10 feet. 5. Front yard parking setback from publicly dedicated local access streets shall be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. 13 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) 7. The setback from Perimeter Drive shall be 30' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 8. Building setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be consistent for all building if possible. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for structures within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be 28' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facility shall be regulated by Dublin Zoning Code. 2. The parking space requirement for the southern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive) shall be 62 spaces for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. 3. The parking space requirement for northern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive) shall be 53 for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or 14 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT (Revisions Highlighted) As submitted to City Council (10- 25 -10) other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: 1. In addition, landscaping within Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive shall include a3' to T landscaped mound with street trees planted 50' on center within the right -of -way and planted 1' form the right -of -way line. 2. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2" to 21/2" caliper for shade trees, U to 8' height for evergreens and 1" to 11/2" caliper for ornamentals. Architecture: 1. Architectural standards shall be the same as defined for the retail center. 2. Architectural character shall be sensitive to adjacent development if applicable. 15 CITY OF DUBLIN_ Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 Phone: 614 - 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 - 410 -4490 To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha Grigsby, Interim City Manager," Date: October 7, 2010 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 36 -10 — Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan — Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 — Avery Square Shopping Center /Kroger, 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive and 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive (Case No. 10 -001 Z/PDP/FDP /CU). Summary Ordinance 36 -10 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan for 28.42 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside PCD, Subareas B and 131) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square PUD). If approved, the rezoning would permit the addition of a fuel station for the Kroger grocery store (as a conditional use), establish an area for a future outparcel, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center, install two center identification signs, and account for future driveway and access improvements. History The Riverside Planned Commerce District, originally approved in 1989, encompassed land between Post Road, Avery- Muirfield Drive and US 33, divided into Subareas A through C. Permitted uses include commercial, medical and office. Subareas B and B1 were originally zoned for a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a development plan for a 225,000- square -foot retail center on March 14, 1996. In the late 1990s, both the Commission and Council reviewed and approved rezoning requests that addressed sign standards for the shopping center and parking requirements for the restaurant outparcels. Description The site is located on the south side of Perimeter Drive, the west side of Avery - Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. Main access is from Hospital Drive in the eastern portion of the site; secondary access from Hospital Drive in the far southeast portion of the site; four additional access points along Perimeter Drive to the north (two for service vehicles and two for public access); and shared access with the hospital site along the south property line. The site is developed with the Avery Square shopping center (206,341 square feet) along the north and west boundary, the Kroger grocery store as the main tenant, and two restaurant outparcels located along the east boundary. Parking is provided for 1,205 vehicles. A landscape hedge with intermittent masonry pillars is located along Avery - Muirfield Drive (as required in the development text), landscape beds on either side of the main entrance, and a pond to the west of the main entry drive. Memo re. Ordinance 36 -10 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Avery Square Shopping Center/Kroger October 7, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Process Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development District requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation for the development requirements noted. The Zoning Code covers all other requirements. This development text establishes a new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) with development regulations that apply only to the 24.43 acres. The remainder of the 28.42 acres of the development within the Riverside Planned Commerce District is the Walgreens pharmacy parcel. All other land previously encompassed as part of the Riverside plan has been rezoned to other PUDs. Planning and Zoning Commission Reviews The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the rezoning, final development plan and conditional use requests at three different meetings. The following is a summary of the Commission's reviews of this proposal. July 8, 2010 The Commissioners generally were in favor of the fuel station and outparcel, but expressed concerns about their location and layout. The Commissioners also suggested changes to the interior north -south circulation drives for the shopping center. Planning staff had noted that the relocated main entry drive provided an opportunity for the center to create a dynamic entry. Suggestions from the Commission included a boulevard and the removal of parking spaces for the grocery store to permit additional landscaping, a water feature, and open space. Some Commissioners felt that the shopping center identification signs, currently permitted in the development text, should be prohibited in the development text. The Commissioners also voiced their concerns regarding the combination of the three applications, preferring to act separately on them over time. At the request of the applicant, the Commission tabled all three application components. August 19, 2010 The Commissioners expressed continued concern about the layout of the outparcel and its potential effects on nearby parking. The Commission suggested that the applicant delineate an area for the outparcel and allow details to be reviewed with a final development plan in the future. The Commission acknowledged the revisions to the fuel station location and encouraged the applicant to eliminate a curbcut along the south entry drive to improve circulation. The Commissioners also wanted to ensure that landscape islands were sized appropriately to ensure survivability of plant material. The Commission provided input on the proposed entry feature and suggested that a more dramatic design was needed and that, if done appropriately, the shopping center identification signs, integrated into the entries, may be permitted. Memo re. Ordinance 36 -10 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Avery Square Shopping Center/Kroger October 7, 2010 Page 3 of 5 The Commission tabled all three application components at the request of the applicant. September 16, 2010 The Commission recommended approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan for the new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) with two conditions. They requested that the proposed development text be modified to clarify the fuel station ownership by the grocery store and to correct an existing clerical error regarding articulation for blank facades along the rear. The Commission also approved the final development plan, which included the proposed fuel station for the Kroger grocery store, shopping center access modifications, entry feature and landscaping, and center identification signs. Four conditions were attached to the final development plan addressing sign lighting, landscape material and placement, and sign landscaping for the Perimeter Drive entry. The Commission also approved the conditional use request for a fuel station on this site without conditions. Commissioners complimented the applicant on their efforts to address previous comments and concerns. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Commission recommended approval of the rezoning to City Council at the September 16, 2010 meeting with two conditions. 1) That the development text be modified to clarify the fuel station ownership by the grocery store as discussed by the Commission; and 2) That the development text be modified to encourage articulation along blank facades along the rear. Subsequent to the recommendation for approval of the rezoning to City Council, the applicant has modified the proposed development text to address all recommended conditions. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Details Proposed Development Text The applicant updated the previously approved development text to include the fuel station as a conditional use, reflect current development patterns and requirements, and incorporate previously granted development details. Use The proposed development text refers to the permitted uses in the Zoning Code's Community Commercial and Suburban Office and Institutional Districts. It also permits up to 3,000 square feet of outdoor dining areas across the retail center, to be administratively approved by Planning. The text was revised to require matching patio amenities and off -site storage from November 1 until April 1. Outdoor display areas for live plant material are permitted as regulated by a recent Zoning Code amendment. Memo re. Ordinance 36 -10 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Avery Square Shopping Center/Kroger October 7, 2010 Page 4 of 5 The development text requires conditional use approval for drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use, theaters, fuel stations and any outdoor dining areas that do not meet the Permitted Use requirements. The text has been revised to clearly state that the fuel station shall be owned by the grocery store and /or its subsidiaries. Density /Lot Coverage The existing center contains 206,341 square feet. The proposed development text specifies a maximum building square footage of 10,000 square feet per acre. The retail center site could yield a maximum building area of 250,000 square feet. Parking Code requires 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or 1,135 parking spaces. The proposed text has been revised to require parking at four (4) spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The ratio of four spaces per 1,000 square feet is widely accepted as an adequate requirement for parking for shopping center developments. At 4/1,000 square feet, 826 spaces are required. The preliminary development plan, which includes the fuel station kiosk, indicates 875 spaces. Architecture The proposed development text contains detailed material requirements, including warm -toned brick and stone veneer with limestone trim. The text has been updated to reflect slate or synthetic slate as the roofing material. Harmonized color selection is emphasized as are scale and building mass through articulated fenestration, patterns or structural expressions. The text encourages articulation along blank facades to the rear of buildings. Signs The proposed text has sign requirements for the shopping center, fuel station and outparcels, with a provision for center identification signs. As requested by the Commission, the applicant has deleted language prohibiting electronic advertising and billboards, which would then be covered by the Zoning Code. Center Identification Signs The Zoning Code allows two center identification signs for this site at a maximum height of 15 feet and a maximum size of 66.6 square feet. There was discussion at Commission meetings to prohibit the shopping center from having center identification signs to eliminate visual clutter. The applicant revised the proposed text to restrict their sign height to a maximum of 8 feet and an area of 42 square feet. The Commission approved designs for both signs with the final development plan. Tenant Signs The proposed development text permits two signs per tenant -- a wall sign and a projecting sign. The text includes specific design requirement for these signs, including a specific color palette. hi addition to the sign for the grocery store, four other locations are permitted wall signs at a height Memo re. Ordinance 36 -10 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Avery Square Shopping Center/Kroger October 7, 2010 Page 5 of 5 that exceeds Code. All of these signs exist, and no changes are proposed. The provision for an awning sign has been eliminated. Fuel Station The development text requires a conditional use for a fuel station, and the applicant has included a layout in the preliminary development plan for a fuel station in the southeast portion of the shopping center parking lot. The final development plan approval included the details for the proposed fuel station, including architecture for the fuel canopy and kiosk, a monument sign, and landscaping. Outparcel The preliminary development plan provides for a future outparcel in the southeastern portion of the north parking lot. The Commission supported the location, but not the proposed layout -- primarily because of the elimination of parking spaces across from the Wendy's/Tim Hortons restaurant. At the Commission's suggestion, the applicant eliminated the details for the outparcel. Planning recommended that the applicant show a larger area that would allow an appropriate site design at final development. The density specified in the text of 10,000 square feet per acre is within the permitted building square footage. The outparcel's site design, architecture, signs and landscaping must be approved by the Commission as a final development plan. Traffic Study The additional traffic generated by the proposed fuel center and outparcel can be accommodated on the existing roadway network. The City will be making long -term improvements to the Avery - Muirfield Drive corridor, and will request the donation of the land for the necessary right -of -way. Final Development Plan/Conditional Use The applicant requested simultaneous review by the Commission of a conditional use for the fuel station for the Kroger store and a final development plan for all planned site improvements (with the exception of the outparcel), including the fuel station, access modifications, signs and landscaping. The final development plan and conditional use were approved by the Commission on September 16, 2010. The materials approved by the Commission are included in the packet for your information. However, neither is effective until the rezoning/preliminary development plan is approved and the ordinance effective date is reached. Should Council make significant changes to the development text and/or preliminary development plan, the final development plan would need to be changed to reflect Council's actions (as needed). Recommendation Staff recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 36 -10 at the second reading/public hearing on October 25, 2010. PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD Post -Roa R -1 I R -1 I R-1 I R -1 SITE 104 Pe ril',, ��. or PCD � o PCD PCD PUD Hospital:Drive PUD State Route 33 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU N City of Dublin Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ n Land Use and Final Development Plan /Conditional Use A Long Range Planning Riverside PCD, Subareas B & 131, Avery Square Shopping Center Feet 7100 Hospital Drive 0 250 500 PCD PCD PCD CITY OF DUBLIN- Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/ TDD: 614- 410 -4600 Fax: 614 -410 -4747 Web Site: - .dublin.oh.us February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan [ 'Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) 0 Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) r� E Final Development Plan ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.053(E)) (Section 153.115) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan ❑ Minor Subdivision (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment ❑ Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) ❑ Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 7000 -7100 Hospital Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016 Mailing Address: 191 W. Nationwide Blvd., Suite 200 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Columbus, OH 43215 Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): Parcel Size(s) (Acres): 273 - 008209 10.207 273 - 008208 15.053 273 - 008207 3.166 Existing Land Use /Development: Avery Square Shopping Center IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use /Development: Permit a Kroger fuel facility in a portion of the existing Kroger parking lot. Permit an additional outparcel /retail area in shopping center parking lot. Total acres affected by application: 28.426 acres III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(Sl: Please attach additional sheets if needed. Name (Individual or Organization): Dublin Oaks Limited Mailing Address: 191 W. Nationwide Blvd., Suite 200 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Columbus, OH 43215 Daytime Telephone: (614) 228 -5331 Fax: (614) 469 -8224 Email or Alternate Contact Information: cfraas @castoinfo.com FILE 'COPY 14 r IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Lindsey Taylor Applicant is also property owner: yes ❑ noE1 Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): The Kroger Co. Mailing Address: 4111 Executive Parkway, Westerville, OH 43081 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (614) 898 -3243 Fax: (614) 898 - 3496 Email or Alternate Contact Information: lindsey.taylor @kroger.com V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: This is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Charles Fraas Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Casto Mailing Address: 191 W. Nationwide Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43215 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (614) 227 -3485 Fax: (614) 221 -4454 Email or Alternate Contact Information: cfraas @castoinf0.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. the owner, hereby authorize to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: Q Check this box if the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representative(s) is attached as a separate document Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 20 State of County of Notary Public Stamp or Seal VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by City representatives are essential to process this application. The Owner /Applicant, as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. 1 Charles Fraas , the owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: /� Date: "I� / ur / ''t rt i iV.� rt /I Page 2 of 3 FILE COPY i• Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Application (con't ) Section VI. Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representative(s) I, Paul G. Lukeman Vice President of CRI Holdings, Inc, Managing Member of Dublin Oaks Limited, the owner, hereby authorizes Charles Fraas to act as my applicant or representative in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: Dublin Oaks Limited, an Ohio limited liability company By: CRI Holdings, Inc., an Ohio corporation, Managing Member By: 4� Paul G. Lukeman, Vice President Date: kvl �� , .2 C) I b State of Ohio County of Franklin Subscribed and sworn before me this day of April, 2010. i t -0 Lk, l' 6 6 , 1 G Notary Pub ?� L: MOLL P. B"" _* * Notwy P iogc,8lebdOhb a= My CorrxAww 8*w 12-09-201 11"1 u a`` a FILE COPY VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. 1 Charles Fraas 0 , the owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: e?4 0 �/ /► /� /> I Date: ��, /� �� // (n. �t . /k..t.?-wL 1, C> IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized. 1 Charles Fraas , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: ?:::::, /� Date: k t . ✓lv 14- Subscribed and sworn to before me this �_ day of i 1 20 / State of O � Cqunty of ,n Notary Publi,�, MOLLY P. BENADUM Notary Pd*, Stabd My C M fllWm E)ow 1249-2011 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: 1. o ,' $ Application No: !0 • �/ P &Z Date(s): q. 16. 10 P8Z Action: vod Gb ��i �9 E3 Receipt No Map Zone: / • /� • IO Date Received: l.. •,O Received By: RSe, City Council (First Reading): 10 • /' • '0 I City Council (Second Reading): 10-2—S-10 City Council Action: Ordinance Number: 36 — 10 Type of Request: P.t2on�n ?`t6ry—%. 'n nod. h s+e.. N, S, E(!)(Circle) Side of: 0 1 + -�� five— N,Cg, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: Distance from Nearest Intersection: Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: ?V.b Page 3 of 3 FILE COPY 3.166 ACRES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being located in Virginia Military Survey Number 2999 and being 3.166 acres of that tract of land as conveyed to Hospital Properties, Inc., an Ohio Corporation Not for Profit by deed of record in Official Record 13642G19, all references being to records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning for reference at the centerline of Perimeter Road at the intersection of the westerly property line of that subdivision entitled "Perimeter Center ", as shown of record in Plat Book 72, pages 78 and 48; thence South 4 °37' 38" East, a distance of 115.38 feet to a point; thence South 85 22' 22" West, a distance of 72.61 feet to an iron pin set at the "True Point of Beginning" for the tract herein intended to be described; thence leaving said True Pont of Beginning and being along the proposed westerly right -of -way line of Avery — Muirfield Road, the following courses (3) and distances: South 4 55' 34" East, a distance of 124.90 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 2 34' 53 ", Radius = 5789.58 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 6 13' 00" East, 260.82 feet to an iron pin set at a point of reverse curvature; and, Southwesterly along the arc of said curve to the right (Delta = 92 °52' 49 ", Radius = 50.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 38 55' 58" West, 72.47 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency in the northerly proposed right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road; thence being along the proposed northerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road, the following courses (2) and distances: South 85 22' 22" West, a distance of 137.70 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; and, Southwesterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 15 09' 40 ", Radius = 420.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 77 47' 32" West, 110.81 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 0 ° 32' 39" West, leaving said right -of -way line, a distance of 543.37 feet to an iron pin set in the proposed southerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Drive on the arc of a curve to the left; thence being along the proposed southerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Drive, the following courses (3) and distances: Continued.......... 3.166 ACRES - Page 2 - Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 16 07' 00 ", Radius = 650.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 86 52' 04" East, 182.24 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; North 85 04' 26" East, a distance of 5.00 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the right; and, Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 90 00' 00 ", Radius = 65.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 49 55' 34" East, 91.92 feet to the place of beginning, containing 3.166 acres of land, more or less. Subject, however, to all legal rights -of -way and /or easements, if any, of previous record. The bearings are based on the same meridians as the bearings shown upon the Recorded Plat entitled "Perimeter Center ", in Plat Book 72, Pages 47 and 48, in which the centerline of Perimeter Drive has a bearing of North 85 22' 22" East, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC. James R. Hill Registered Surveyor No. 6919 10.207 ACRES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being located in Virginia Military Survey Numbers 2999 and 3452 and being 10.207 acres of that tract of land as conveyed to Hospital Properties, Inc., an Ohio Corporation Not for Profit by deed of record in Official Record 13642G19, all references being to records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning for reference at the centerline of Perimeter Road at the intersection of the westerly property line of that subdivision entitled "Perimeter Center ", as shown of record in Plat Book 72, Pages 47 and 48; thence South 4 °37' 38" East, a distance of 115.38 feet to a point; thence South 85 22'22" West, a distance of 72.61 feet to an iron pin set; thence being along the proposed westerly right -of -way line of Avery - Muirfield Road, the following courses (3) and distances: South 4 55' 34" East, a distance of 124.90 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 2 34' 53 ", Radius = 5789.58 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 6 13' 00" East, 260.82 feet to an iron pin set at a point of reverse curvature; and, Southwesterly along the arc of said curve to the right (Delta = 92 52' 49 ", Radius = 50.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 38 °55' 58" West, 72.47 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency in the northerly proposed right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road; thence being along the proposed northerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road, the following courses (2) and distances: South 85 22' 22" West, a distance of 137.70 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; Southwesterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 22° 00' 00 ", Radius = 420.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 74 22' 22" West, 160.28 feet to an iron pin set at the "True Point of Beginning" for the tract herein intended to be described; thence leaving said "True Point of Beginning" and continuing along said proposed northerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road, the following courses (3) and distances: Southwesterly continuing along the arc of said curve (Delta = 6° 57' 51 ", Radius = 420.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 59 53' 27" West, 51.02 feet to an iron pin set at a point of compound curvature; Continued.......... 10.207 ACRES - Page 2 - Southwesterly along the arc of said curve to the left (Delta = 56 43' 39 ", Radius = 397.85 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 28 02' 41" West, 378.01 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; and, South 0 19' 08" East, a distance of 49.15 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 87 14' 12" West, leaving said proposed right -of -way line, a distance of 835.68 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 7 27'09" West, a distance of 248.37 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 2 45' 06" East, a distance of 195.50 feet to an iron pin set; thence South 87 ° 14' 54" East, a distance of 352.08 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 2 °45' 06" East, a distance of 23.69 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 19 29' 51 " West, a distance of 35.45 feet to an iron pin set; thence South 87 14' 54" East, a distance of 640.33 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the right; thence Southeasterly along the are of said curve (Delta = 60 ° 37' 16 ", Radius = 100.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 56 °56' 16" East, 100.94 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; thence South 26 37' 38" East, a distance of 31.14 feet to the place of beginning, containing 10.207 acres of land, more or less. Subject, however, to all legal rights -of -way and /or easements, if any, of previous record. The bearings are based on the same meridians as the bearings shown upon the Recorded Plat entitled "Perimeter Center ", in Plat Book 72, Pages 47 and 48, in which the centerline of Perimeter Drive has a bearing of North 85 22' 22" East, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC. James R. Hill Registered Surveyor No. 6919 15.053 ACRES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being located in Virginia Military Survey Numbers 2999 and 3452 and being 15.053 acres of that tract of land as conveyed to Hospital Properties, Inc., an Ohio Corporation Not for Profit by deed of record in Official Record 13642G19, all references being to records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning for reference at the centerline of Perimeter Road at the intersection of the westerly property line of that subdivision entitled "Perimeter Center ", as shown of record in Plat Book 72, Pages 47 and 48; thence South 4 °37' 38" East, a distance of 115.38 feet to a point; thence South 85 °22' 22" West, a distance of 72.61 feet to an iron pin set; thence being along the proposed westerly right -of -way line of Avery - Muirfield Road, the following courses (3) and distances: South 4 55' 34" East, a distance of 124.90 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 2 34' 53 ", Radius = 5789.58 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 6 13' 00" East, 260.82 feet to an iron pin set at a point of reverse curvature; and, Southwesterly along the are of said curve to the right (Delta = 92 52' 49 ", Radius = 50.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 38 °55' 58" West, 72.47 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency in the northerly proposed right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road; thence being along the proposed northerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Loop Road, the following courses (2) and distances: South 85 22' 22" West, a distance of 137.70 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; and Southwesterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 15 09' 40 ", Radius = 420.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 77 47' 32" West, 110.81 feet to an iron pin set at the True Point of Beginning for the tract herein intended to be described; thence southwesterly, leaving said True Point of Beginning and continuing along the arc of said curve and proposed northerly right -of -way line (Delta = 6 50' 20 ", Radius = 420.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 66 47' 32" West, 50.10 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 26 37' 38" West, leaving said proposed right -of -way line, a distance of 31.14 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature to the left; thence northwesterly, along the arc of said curve (Delta = 60 37' 16 ", Radius = 100.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of North 56 0 56' 16" West, 100.94 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; Continued.......... 15.053 ACRES - Page 2 - thence North 87 14' 54" West, a distance of 640.33 feet to an iron pin set; thence South 19 51" East, a distance of 35.45 feet to an iron pin set; thence South 2 0 45' 06" West, a distance of 23.69 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 87 14'54" West, a distance of 352.08 feet to an iron pin set; thence North 2° 45' 06" East, a distance of 583.96 feet to an iron pin set on the arc of a curve to the right in the proposed southerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Drive; thence being along the proposed southerly right -of -way line of Perimeter Drive, the following courses (5) and distances: Northeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 3 30' 45 ", Radius = 1960.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of North 80 ° 05' 56" East, 120.14 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; North 81 51' 19" East, a distance of 333.90 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the right; Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 26 °21' 47 ", Radius = 410.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 84° 57' 48" East, 186.99 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; South 71 ° 46' 55" East, a distance of 399.80 feet to an iron pin set at a point of curvature of a curve to the left; and, Southeasterly along the arc of said curve (Delta = 7 01' 39 ", Radius = 650.00 feet), a chord bearing and distance of South 75° 17' 44" East, 79.67 feet to an iron pin set at a point of tangency; thence South 0 32' 39" East, a distance of 543.37 feet to the place of beginning, containing 15.053 acres of land, more or less. Subject, however, to all legal rights -of -way and /or easements, if any, of previous record. The bearings are based on the same meridians as the bearings shown upon the Recorded Plat entitled "Perimeter Center ", in Plat Book 72, Pages 47 and 48, in which the centerline of Perimeter Drive has a bearing of North 85 22' 22" East, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC. James R. Hill Registered Surveyor No. 6919 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Riverside Charles Fraas Mr_ flan McLoughlin PCD — Subarea B — Kroger Fuel Dublin Oaks Limited The Kroger Company Station 191 West Nationwide Blvd 4111 Executive Paskway 7100 Hospital Drive Suite 200 WcAarwillc, OD 43081 Columbus, 01143215 6600 Perimeter Drive LLC J & A Real Estate Co. LLC Charles Conroy 6600 Perimeter Drive Suite A 6620 Perimeter Drive Suite A 4150 E. Johnston Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Columbus, OH 43230 Champaign Bank Huntington National Bank Manager: McDonalds 6400 Perimeter Drive Bank Property Division 6260 Perimeter Drive Dublin, OH 43016 PO Box 182334 Columbus, OH 43218 Dublin, OH 43017 Fifth Third Bank Manager: Chase Bank Industry Consulting MD 10ATAl CORP FAC 6271 Perimeter Drive JP Morgan Chase Cincinnati, OH 45236 Dublin, OH 43017 PO Box 810490 Dallas, TX 75381 James Holowicki F.W. and Benjamin Englefield Manager: Walgreens 5049 Cemetery Road 447 James Parkway, Suite 1 6805 Hospital Drive Hilliard, OH 43026 heath, OH 43056 Dublin, OH 43017 Debbie Reynard Walgreen Co. Office of General Counsel Ohio Health Corp. 300 Wilmot Road OhioHealth 180 E. Broad Street Riverwoods, IL 60015 180 E. Broad Street, Floor 34 Columbus, OH 43215 Columbus, OH 43215 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) Avery Square Approved 1 2010 This following text supersedes the original Riverside Dublin Development Text for former Subareas B and B (Avery Square Shopping Center). The Riverside Dublin Development Text for Subarea B (Walgreen's) shall remain in effect until such time it is amended. Retail Center 2 5. 1 ac. The retail center is located south of Perimeter Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. The Dublin Methodist Hospital property is located to the south and west of the retail center. This area contains a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment typical in size to a small community center. Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels 4 ac. Retail outparcels located along Avery Muirfield Drive, south of Perimeter Drive and north of Hospital Drive. Uses and architecture will be integrated into the retail center. Development Standards for Retail Center and Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels General 1. If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Unit Development District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Unit Development District. 2. The revised access plan shown on the preliminary development plan is the general scheme to be constructed with the planned intersection improvements at Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive and Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive. It is not however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be preserved, its precise location may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. The final access design is dependent on the City of Dublin's Hospital Drive /Avery Muirfield Drive intersection improvements. 3. Signage and Graphics: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) a. All signage and graphics shall conform to the Dublin Zoning Code except as provided by this text, and except as provided for in the Signage Criteria and approved as part of the Final Development Plan. b. The Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels ground supported signage shall reflect a uniform shape and shall be set in a frame of dark brown, black or bronze color. The center identification signs shall have the letters attached to an aluminum plaque. C. All uses within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall have signage of uniform size, shape and materials, sign bases shall be made of stone. These signs shall have a maximum height of 6' and contain no more than 50 SF of area per face. Landscaping shall be integrated into signage feature. d. All uses within Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be allowed two ground signs, one sign oriented toward Avery Muirfield Drive and one sign oriented toward either a second public street (provided the site has at least 100 feet of frontage on two public streets) or the internal access road on the west side. e. No building mounted signs will be allowed along Avery Muirfield Drive frontage. f The retail center shall be permitted two overall center identification signs, one located along Perimeter Drive and one located along Hospital Drive customer entrance. Sign bases shall reflect similar materials to the building architecture. All building mounted signage should conform to Dublin Signage Code except as provided herein and reflect a common shape, size, material and base color. g. No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence except as provided herein or as permitted as tenant's main identification sign under the " Signage and Graphics" section of the Retail Center herein. No wall murals shall be allowed. h. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. i. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. j. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) k. On site permanent directional sign, e.g. employee and visitor parking, deliveries, etc. will be of a common design, material and size must meet signage standards. 1. Fuel pump identification signs (numbers only) at the fuel station shall be permitted. 4. Lighting: a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff type fixtures. b. All parking, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be form the same type and style. C. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall be constructed of dark wood, or dark brown, black or bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28'. e. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. 5. Miscellaneous: a. All bike racks must have two lock -up positions. b. If used, bollards on the site must be painted to match the building colors. Retail Center Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Retail Center: a) Those uses listed in the Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial Districts of the Zoning Code. 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) C) Outdoor Dining Areas with up to 3,000 total sq. ft. of seating space within the retail center area that can be allotted to the various tenants to be administratively approved by Land Use and Long Range Planning. Those outdoor dining areas shall employ matching amenities (fences, tables, chairs, flower boxes) and must be of a black, wrought -iron design consistent with the patios which have been approved for the center. All patio materials (e.g., tables, chairs, etc.) must be removed from the patio area from November 1 to April 1. Such materials cannot be stored outside at the center. d) Outdoor Display Area for Live Plant Material as regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code. Conditional Uses The following uses shall be allowed within the Planned Development subject to additional review and approval as prescribed by the Dublin Zoning Code: a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Theaters. C) Fuel station which shall be owned by the grocery store at the shopping center and its subsidiaries. d) Outdoor Dining Areas that do not meet the requirements listed above. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Perimeter Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 30', building setbacks 50'. 2. Along the Hospital Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. 3. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. Total building square footage permitted per acre shall not exceed 10,000 square feet. 4 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) Utilities: 1. All utility lines including water supply, sanitary sewer service, electricity, telephone and fuel, and their connections or feeder lines should be placed underground. 2. All utility connections should be kept to the rear or the side of the building, out of view or screened. 3. All mechanical equipment and related structures should be effectively screened from grade level view as well as on site views from within the development. 4. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened form public view with materials harmonious with the building. Circulation: 1. Opposing curb cuts on the Perimeter Drive and the Hospital Drive shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices. Parking: In addition to meeting the current City of Dublin code requirements, the following requirements should be followed in the design of parking facilities. 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code unless otherwise noted herein. 2. Parking shall be provided at 4 spaces per every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the buildings. 3. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate aminimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 4. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Dublin Zoning Code. 5. Fuel station stacking shall accommodate a minimum of three spaces per pump. 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) 6. Parking stalls shall be laid out in the most efficient manner; 90 degree layouts are suggested with 9' x 19' stall and 22' - 24' aisles. No parking shall be permitted on either the Perimeter Drive or Hospital Drive. 8. Curb cuts shall be permitted as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. 9. Where slopes occur that exceed 3:1, the area shall be terraced or treated with erosion control materials, shrubs or ground cover. Materials which will roll, wash or float away are to be avoided on these slopes. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Service: 1. All loading activity shall occur within a building. 2. No noises, smoke, odors, vibrations or other nuisances shall be permitted. 3. No area of the site will be used for outdoor storage. 4. Service courts and loading docks shall be screened from all streets by landscaping, mounding or walls. 5. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure, except as provided for in Section 6 of General Conditions herein, as approved as part of an outdoor live plant display area Landscaping: 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) 1. Along Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive, a 3' to 4' high landscape mound shall be provided with street trees planted 50' on center, within the right -of -way and planted 1' from the right -of -way line. 2. The rear of all buildings or structures shall be screened with planting, hedge, fence, wall or earth mound to provide a minimum of 50% winter opacity and 70% summer opacity, between 1' above finish level and 6' in height. 3. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2 1/2" caliper for shade trees, 6' to 8' height for evergreen and 1" to 1 1/2" caliper for ornamentals. General Conditions 1. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be seeded. 2. Street trees on each side of an entry drive shall be set back twenty (20) feet from the curb to accentuate the entry /exit points. 3. A minimum greenbelt of ten (10) feet shall be maintained along each adjoining property line. 4. Shrub plantings are recommended masses or clustered in beds rather than singular shrub plantings. 5. Site unity can be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade trees, evergreen trees and ornamental trees). New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. 6. No outdoor display area around the fuel facility sales kiosk or the fuel pumps shall be permitted. 7. In the event that the fuel station is closed for aperiod of 180 days and such closure is not a result of a force maj cure event or as part of a renovation/redevelopment of the station, the kiosk, canopy, pumps, and underground tanks shall be removed from the site and the pavement and landscaping shall be restored in a manner consistent with the current parking field. 7 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) Architecture Height: A. No outparcel structure shall be more than 28' in height. For structures with pitched roofs, this height limit will be measured to the roof peak. B. Height limit for the retail center will be 35'. Color Palette: A. Earth tones, muted and natural tones are preferred. Accent colors in brighter hues such as white are permitted for building accent features only. A mixed palette on a single building should be carefully selected so all colors harmonize with each other. Materials: A. Warm -tone brick. B. White brick can be used as accent. C. Slate or synthetic slate roofing material. D. Split -face concrete block or pre -cast concrete used as an accent with dark brick only. E. Stone veneer with limestone trim (limestone rubble in a coarse ashlar pattern). F. Stucco when accented with brick or stone. Roof: A. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are suggested with a slope equal to 8/12. B. Minimum 8" overhangs are suggested. C. Glass roofs are acceptable in portions of a structure. D. Mansard roofs are permitted. 12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) E. Flat roofs are permitted if architecturally coordinated and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scale: A. The scale of the structures should be sympathetic to a residential character. B. Structures should be designed to harmonize with the landscape. C. The scale of each building can be aidedthroughthe use of articulated building elements such as porticoes, dormers, recesses and other such elements which help break up the mass and bring it into a more residential character. Wall Articulation/Fenestration: A. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. B. Blank facades on the "rear" of the building will not be permitted, articulating such facades with recesses, fenestration, fences, pilasters, etc. is encouraged. C. The amount of fenestration should be balanced with the amount of solid facade. D. With the exception of enclosed service corridors, the buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. Signage and Graphics All signs shall comply with the sign code unless varied by this text or accompanying drawings. A. Main Identification Signs: 1. A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 8 feet in height on Hospital Drive, 8 feet in height on Perimeter Drive, and 18 feet in width, with a maximum each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 42 square feet per 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail tenant signage materials and colors. 2. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. 3. There will be no project identification sign located adjacent to Avery Muirfield Drive. B. All signs shall meet the following elements: 1. All wall and projecting signage shall meet the City Sign Code relative to permitted sign face area and that wall signs not exceed 15 feet in height, except as noted. a. Wall sign for the major tenant: will be a maximum of 22' 0" above finished walkway. b. The following maximum tenant sign heights are permitted: 7044 -7052 Hospital Drive; 20 feet: 6545 -6459 Perimeter Drive: 20 feet; 6415 -6435 Perimeter Drive: 18 feet. 2. Each tenant store front shall be limited to one wall sign, and one projecting sign. Wall sign faces shall not exceed one square foot in area of each one lineal foot in store frontage not to exceed 80 square feet, except in the case of the major tenant. (See Section 3 below). Projecting sign faces shall not exceed three square feet in area. 3. The major tenant shall be permitted signage of an individual nature within the center with a maximum area of 109 square feet. The letters shall be internally illuminated with "white" plastic faces. An individual tenant may select any one of the sign colors from the approved sign palette for a tenant wall sign. 4. Each tenant space may have one (1) projecting sign of uniform size and design, as illustrated by the accompanying drawing. Background color of projecting sign shall match letter color of that particular tenant's wall sign. 5. The signs will be externally illuminated, except for the major tenant, by gooseneck light fixtures. The gooseneck fixtures will be comprised of the same exterior finish and color, subject to staff approval. 6. The color of wall signs and projecting signs shall be selected from following sign palette, or a compatible color approved by LULRP: a) Martin - Senour Market Square Tavern Dark Green W85 -0620. 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) b) Martin - Senour Palace Arms Red W1083. c) Martin - Senour Benjamin Powell House Green W85 -1089. d) Sherwin Williams Palais White SW -2429. e) Sherwin Williams Obsidian (Dark Blue) SW2738. I) Sherwin Williams Amethyst SW2703. g) Sherwin Williams Bonfire SW2321. The fuel station shall be entitled to one monument sign as approved with the Final Development Plan. The monument sign shall not exceed 6 feet in height and 9 feet in width. No signage or TV screens shall be permitted on the building, pumps or canopy, except as required by law. Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels: a) Those uses listed in Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial District of the Zoning Code. Conditional Uses a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Outdoor Dining Areas. General The orientation and the face of the out parcels will be to the west and at the corners toward the intersecting streets and to what would normally be considered the rear of those parcels, (i.e. the portion abutting Avery Muirfield Drive will be employed as an entrance feature to the residential areas to the north). Buildings will have a common architectural theme with good aesthetic quality, the same or compatible building materials and a common lighting, signage and landscaping ethic. Within this mold the west, and intersecting street faces may identify the separate users and their 11 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) products with appropriate expressions of individuality. However the east face must appear as a unified, single expression. Structures, be they buildings or walls, roof lines and types, building spacing, signage lighting and landscaping should present an almost non-commercial approach with low level signage employed solely to identify users and structures and landscaping effectively shielding the street from the impact of activity on the site. The following additional standards are deemed appropriate to produce such afunction. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the right to review all applications for their architectural consistency. Additional materials and colors may be approved by Commission if they are consistent with other building materials and add to the overall architectural quality. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. The setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be 45' for pavement and 65' for buildings. 2. Setback from Hospital Drive will be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings 3. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be at least 10 feet. 5. Front yard parking setback from publicly dedicated local access streets shall be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. The setback from Perimeter Drive shall be 30' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 8. Building setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be consistent for all building if possible. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for structures within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be 28' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. 12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facility shall be regulated by Dublin Zoning Code. 2. The parking space requirement for the southern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive) shall be 62 spaces for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. 3. The parking space requirement for northern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive) shall be 53 for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: 1. In addition, landscaping within Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive shall include a3' to T landscaped mound with street trees planted 50' on center within the right -of -way and planted 1' form the right -of -way line. 2. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2" to 21/2" caliper for shade trees, 6' to 8' height for evergreens and 1" to 11/2" caliper for ornamentals. Architecture: 1. Architectural standards shall be the same as defined for the retail center. 2. Architectural character shall be sensitive to adjacent development if applicable. 13 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to City Council (10- 11 -10) 14 CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO ZONING DOCUMENTS FOR THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER K '21'1 • • : ■ • , k Dublin Oaks Limited 191 West Nationwide Blvd., Suite 200 Columbus, Ohio (614) 22B -5331 (Phone) (614) 221 -4454 (Fax) Contact: Charlie Frees DEVELOPER The Kroger Co. 4111 Executive Parkway Westerville, Ohio 43081 Contact: Mr. Alan McLoughlin Phone: 614 - 898 -320D Email: Alon.McLoughlin @Kroger.com ENGINEER C.F. Bird & R.J. Bull, Inc. 2B75 W. Dublin- Granville Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 (614) 761 -1661 (Phone) (614) 761 -1328 (Fax) Contact: Andrew Gardner, P.E. N ARCHITECT SSOE Group 545 Metro Place South, Suite 100 Dublin, Ohio (614) 766 -3675 (Phone) (614) 766 -3605 (Fax) Contact: Scott Hathaway LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Faris Planning & Design, LLC 243 N. 5th Street, Suite 401 Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 487 -1964 (Phone) Contact: Todd Faris wa SON DPC4v I ) i i I ,y I it C �`°`� °� - - �� - - �__�_ _____ _ � � �•` � I � ��_ 13D�3o4 I I I I I 11 I I 1 I HUNDN BANK ,p{TON IIII III I II AVER'KfA (I t li UIFIEL Q III A� - V 1 ' - L - l _ `e ) - - -a � k 'j T_____ + - ' - LIT __� - � / 1- __� L�2 t � i I i i i I1111 I I I III I I r —� - --- - ------ { F__L_L 5 J I I I I I I III "II IiIII r___ - ZLJ -__ Lu) P �- 7FOOBZW[71 II liUilnnimrr 10 I T OUTLOT "A" T i t I I I U Jill _ -- —__ r 1.5 ACRES II II 1 j l 1 1 III I' LT niiiiiiiiii U i'IHi l l U I I I I I I I I I I I I I + I U I l l l l l I U I U LH++, T- T+ I I I I I I I I.�.iI I I U I I I 1+H H+ H }I- - I +HH -FN+ HHiF \ IIII I �I +H }I +H +H FH }µ I i I (]lullululunnn ��`�rvrr.rvrrrrvr I II n ll llllnlnlllllnn VIII ° °iv�e u iwiv � I I � I ____ UIIIIIIIA +� +H +HI " IIIIIIIII IIIIIIrHtw ' I I I U I I I I I IJ I Illlll I {O N � I y, n�l - n� -I n l H l n I l HH +H+ H +H +H }µ{-� I II - ' 1 I SEC�TIpry; w � I¢ � I I I I I I U L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'� I I I I I I I I I I I U II I I n111 Y + +H }HH +Hn + +��4 +LUT +H +HH +HI IfTI+.+H+i- - 14 H+H +ii+i- n�iH +Fll \ \ \° I lilldl hill niiiiiiiiiiiiiiii `I r_____ UIIIIIIIIIIIUII I I III I I 15.05AC. U IIIIIIIIIII a IIIIIII U IIIIIIIIIIII U Illlll U �', ITT W O N II +H }HH {H +Fn H +H }H H+{ +H� r_ ON z IM 11 j1 1 11 1 1 UIIIInInnHlnlnUllnn IIIIIIHIIIIIIJ LIiI IU HL14HL III s, ° IIIIIIIIIII P r \ L 1 ��1�1 ll �11ll1J1Ull1 J I 0 1 _ __ -- iu iu iu wn n l l l l l l l IIIIIIIIIIII f F_) ------- - - - - -- ulLn --- -------- - -s - 1 -I - I - ___-- - -_ -�_ I �ACp -0NE T - - - - - 1 I rnrnrrn n — --------- ' -_ \~ -' r _ „�n.�\ �..�� IIIIIII IIn III77 7 I!77T �� 1 I - ° T tnrnmr7in° i I 1i nulnnMlllll Illuuuuulllll PIIIIII�IIII � � � �'-�_ (D� H +K I ++I+v+H.+H- I++ d I� UIUIIII }r �H +H +H +Ha V�IIIII liuIIIIIIIIIIUIIII I unrinlllllu I __ - - �_ I IIIIIIIIIIUI IIIIIIIIIIIn n IIIIIIII +- I++/+I+ III, u EXISTING KROGER 5 I j I .I. Iry I j I I j IIIIIIIIIII ll I µ // r v �r��r – c u r ' I I I I I I II IIII I 1 N-89 nIIn ❑ x • i '•� r .`\ I + +HT r- t n IIIUIIIUI❑IIII II� 7108 HOSPITAL DRIVE ' U 7BBB208p H-1- i+I++f+ � n ----- ° t � III I �y ib.'hhIAU.I Inllnnlulllll n'll U�� nl uIIII i ul dl IT H P .'• c� ? L IF z7a- B1oa7z n n 1 I oar 1 1 I HI +F{ }�+H I +E ❑ I IIII111I IIII ((�� nx f– ? WALGREEN CO. I I I I i I I iP IO IlullllllnlUlllllullll nIl r _ ��-I -F xii 6B HOSPITAL DRI E uIIII F?� lY ❑ / C� 20NED I v I I I I I1 11 1 H' H 1 ' 1 1 I I I _I I H� UIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII n u IIII II IJr ___J I III I I III I u l i Uiu an l - --------- - 1�1 i .jl I TT`lT!7 Ilwtl#T (Lill ! / HI M T;TfT;�;TrI1s•,I,,,,�„ -k ❑ r rn I\ I - c I TLJ - -- HOSPTAL PR0P % s e — —.... —... —. / _ DI TI P{{{ OFPERIM r - - -__.. a ° jill - _ t ANDT LOT 1 OF HOSP PR L I y II ITAL OP RTI 3ECT1 D�j f101i �. J k_ -_ LI 10 HEAL RVE I \ _� (1 U HOSP DRIVE E �, P18 vt I / ®q ff VE I v� U �E�f VT �� q � ' _ � I / r I �- ZONED UD 1 v LOCATION MAP No Sane SHEETINDEX C1.1 Title Sheet C1.2 Regional Context Map C1.3 Site Vicinity Map C1.4 Existing Conditions Plan C1.5 Preliminary Development Plan C1.6 Final Development. Plan C1.7 Construction Exhibit C1.8 Proposed Fuel Center Detail L -1 Landscaping Plan L -2 Landscaping Plan L -3 Tree Preservation Plan L -4 Tree Replacement Plan L -5 Tree Replacement Plan A -2 Fuel Center Architectural Elevation INDEX MAP Scale: 1" = 100' J ❑ " MIN o o 0 SCALE. ,' =260 0 200 900 600 T GRAPHIC SCALE L �� t — i I I � \ \ \ ii yl i v iii iiii , r�_�_ rRmRmrrn — - T �� t E— 7 ____L J N I i a mmmmm mmimmrli Grip — - -- _ 1 u_ii u u un nuum uuuun a —` � ` 0 0 t 04 -- anm�rrmmr`�rin'n0 mmnvmm II O �y I "'��'imrrirru 1L �— �lihrl Ini 7n ii'i1i° }f♦f�� _nmmmQin� �, I 1 7 FL L Imm rmmm�r1TITTM i�� 1111 1 111 I o I\ 0 0 0 li 4 L �n'muuulirlln,allmimmmmrm "rii IIIII IIIIIIII 1 0 1fL r �I urwwwwuueiuiww lulwwiniwuwiwr� �v�v I I y _ -- \J °° ° ° ° ° ° I \ \ - - 1 0 0� Gmmani�r�rrimm uuw o u kj uni uminii u i'u IX. B ° o � it .. iim � / O , ��1�9 �� ° 1 \, )1 fl � 1 K i ° HIrl' '-1 6 0 it �1 _ \\ H LL 0 (.HOSPITPL cp 0 0 � J - -- PAITC. L NE— — / L � 4 0P COLUMBUS- MPRYSVILLE — �= —_— — -- — — — — — — — COLUMBUS - MSRYBVILLE RO_SR39 _ _ _ _ J . I — �� 4111 �O THE AVERY ROPE RETAIL CENTER i�� ♦ 2000'RADIUS L a� DUBLIN, OHIO ♦ �I � -- I III Bird +Bull. ♦ I 0 0 ,0 00 Bull ,INC. • - 1 1 C E m REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP OM �"I� r � I I I I /l m r ft:(b4)]�61 -161 F=(614) 761 -1329 SCALE: 1" = 200 JOB N0. C� 2 WWW.BIDOBULLC DWN:SG CKD:AAG DATE: 6/26/10 05 -060 _ U -- -� \ �� II U-:1 I I II I 273- 0113368 ( III SCALE I'- 100' 7 H547 AVERY PERIMETER LLC. 8500�R ZONED I �V 1 t 1 L P loo zaC aaa $$$ppp -f� 273-01130 �[�]+' r + LAN GRAPHIC SCALE m \\ 5715'A ONEO PC4J IIIIII 1 I� ZONE CDOR'�c J D J 3- H � I U BA N T N N �6705AVER (FIELD D. 11 Illy 1 U -1 — _ _ — — 1 1 1 II j � I 11 �I L 1_Li r, 1 11 tl 11 ° I I I 2 7 L ------ ��- �J 2 )_ r I�'1 1 li I I � I IK NEC BUSA� ._i � L- LZLS -Z C"- 00828][111 11 II ytf J G' TI 1 1 ERIM RD _- r� OU LOT "A' IO I 1 1 4 �I I� ONE _ T _ il�il �iim nn nnrn7nmrnl f r 1.5 ACRES J- _ I. �I U n n n n U U I��- =_— __�� __� Co { ��O p �_ - -- - - � A TD _ �� I I I I I I I {� 4 Ifj� I n n 1 1 1 1 I l I n 1 I I I l 1 I l 1 l r• III 1 1 � 11 1 1 y + +H4WH +WW �H WV +H4H H +HI IFW +HN- ti +H +HN +Y� +HY ,EC. A. EAEI.. C, UIIIIIIIIIII UIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIII II UIIIIUIIIIIIIIL.8.1111111U ��i UUILUILU � II V' 1I I I 1 m mmmmin , I I I I I I I I I I I I I lihilli +� [H+HH +H +H +C4F1 +IH +H+0 lln n h U IIIIIIIIIII - O . Tmm I 1 III _ HAT` - \ Sv I I v� 11 I 1 1 73-0 589 �� i1 Hl+iili +ii +� + +yam } { I +ii A +H +H 111111 H n 11 1+ +1 111111 n 1111 + -- - - 1 1 1 d 1 II MCD NAL $$ CO P Y103Pf�AL PROPERTIES, INC. _ U U I991 I U U V I I 111 U I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I U C_ 1( { '�j 11 1 1 1 30 P RIM 1ERLOOI 15.05 AC. r_ ��,�,�� 1 1 ORIGINAL '11780 .19 AC. i rnN l n IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII [- • +R`I 3?IM TOJd¢ I IIII Z NE D O G.R.1 2, G.G19 O 1 H i + +H + + +ii �Ti j + +14 +14 + +H +Hl + +I+ +I+ +I +1 + +t n �H+ 14nI4H+ +I+ r= 79 71 . 1 I III gr1I'I 1 I � - I L I IIIIIIIIIIIII V III U IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII U IIIIIIIIIIIIII U I I I I I I I I I I 1 1111 L- I UTL B• I I I ZONEL7 PUU q 1 1 + - 85ACp�S� 1 1111 I�� l i i i l iiui l u i iuiu iiiu� n uiluiu it ) A -- + l'- - - i - - -- - - - -- ,I-- - - - - -1 - - - - - -- IL ) zoNEOrco -_ - - -_ _ —lam 11 ° l ( I '� r ,� „�>;��0m�) _ l” nTnT nnT- rrnTr mri rtn nTn n LL —_�` _ - _ °_ \\ \ El _ U T r�.l l l l l l l l l l l l l F4III II I ( � III II III II II II (III 1 II II II 111 + +H +,+H +H +K +1+1+1+1- rrll+r+ I r H +H +H +H+ IV V AJ--- I (I I ). �� I 1 l' Ir II � Hill �I +H I I 1 rrrr —H +HI II414 1 I +I++H +++ IIIIIIIII H P n H +H +� Q � I 1 did 111111 IIIIIIIIIIIII UIIIIII Ill�i H +/ �i' T�. I p 1�� B.P ION tl I EXISTING W20GER 1 0 1 1 1y o € S 1 IIIIIIIhcmlll IIIllllllllllnllll IIIIII 11 1 \ g L =61 N-817 U + +H-P� B (�pli+l+l+l +++l+i++4+1 -�� - I+tFFI -�.�� i 273-01W72 � �11111� ENGLEFIELDBENJ N O 7100 HOSPITAL DRIVE U Lll IIIIII _ ('�\ I } g �= � p 1 / [ __ WALOREEN CO. I' �I��1 ,c 872 PERM RL —� n I I Trl I�QI IIIIIIIIIII III If / ( , I { 1 1 \Z ED \ PC / / C_ 5HOSP DRI +� / -� RAL �P111 t/ II + FH +H + 1 rl++ti FItFFI� �'1 J iI - I - I U IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII h _ ZONED PCD B I t _ p� I HII I + +H +++ + I H�+ I +1++ IIII iH+1++I++ �; 1 -r Ii H II II II III I \ \ 1 I Q I.II u1u1LY u1 u11.LW1Vy�E�LLw $� III - - - - nrnTn TITITT n �n7t YIN II In (I I1•m � `y �_ - - __ _JU,I U II II IIIVilllllll IIIIII III —T nllry n ITALFIR z. ° VI =_ _ _ CL) ICAT NPLAT OFPERI E IO HEALT CORD LO PRO DA ERESUBDMSIO 6F = �- -� 05HOSPIT DRIVE I \ Ol I ALP ERTIES SECTION AD I N ZONED UD p P.B. PG. 16 `4q �� i �S RES R E.B. IHO�ORIGINAL011PLERTIE& INC. A 1 113592,PG O.R. G �K 1 CC q i 0 g, � / —� SPITAL �� ZG'2T30�U� �� a� 695 ALDRVe PUD �I HD Ex. T — - a a M� y Bird +Bull C.P.B &&.BULL,INC. OX 1 5 wd Ph: (610) ]61 -1661 Rmn ]61-1328 WWWAIRAAIR I_Cl1M THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER DUBLIN, OHIO VICINITY MAP doa nlo. C1.3 OS -060 R / ILA EX RETENTION POND I GHAMPgIGN g` ` R = 6'35P" PgR ER 2 Og �Z - 9J 91 18 G-0 -IRDLIg� w L = 79.73 56704'9 "E h = 79.67 273- 0113 DUNTINGTON RANK ZONE POD R M F \w 31 D = 26'21'47 R= 410.00' L = 188.65' I 1 Ch = 186,99 I 1 5 AG" E 1 IXREfAIL \ 1 I I 1118,&68 F.3 BUILDINGS) I I I r 1820 11 12]0 1220 1853 1 11 q 1 1 1 1Y10 .° 1 1 1 1 f 1 f `I L A �I �I�I lv l I I I I r I 0 90 / f l I q I gg r l 1 l tl I tl �� 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 U 1 16�� 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U 1 1 1 i DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. r 1r1+ + + +t + � I n�106d 0E'WM0TOk M-04An i t lrrlr + + + +t +1i� Ir Ir 1 + + +i �r l r l r l + + + + +i1� U U w= r + + +��titi 1 1 r rr + + + +1 +1 1 1 * + + + +t�y - I r l r l rrrr + + + +1 n rFf - +Fr+ 1111111 1 U 1 i 11111111 U U 1 � 1 � 1 � 1 � U 1 1 1 1 1 AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER SECTIO 1 1 1 G 1 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 +1 + + +t ��1i�irir 1 + 1 + 2�53i0 + 0 ®2 � + i 1 + i 1 � 1�1 1111 1i� �1 + +1 + + +i 1i I ZONEDPCD I rrr + +- 111111111 1 111111111 �Ii I l I l I li 111111111 1in � 111 I l I I I l l l l 393 Parking Spaces In We Half 280 Parking Spaces in East Half I�aalxaaal r 1 1 r� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ix 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� rrrY1 11 li- '45'06 'E 3.69' F1111116 III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1+ i 1 +1 { } +� + +i x + + + ++-I 1 1 -il L44F x1111111x IIIIIIII 11111 II1 Ii ey 11111¢ 1111111111111111111. I I,I 111 EX. BIKE 1 11 RACK 4 AIR 414 4 II P ,1, VIII U 1 1 1 111111FR11 11111 11111 111 11 � IIJI I � } + +I IIIi H + ++ +d+ ++ + + +i M 1 i I 111x11111 I Its 1111111 1111 eD 1111115 1111111111111111111 11 552 Parking Spaces V III F 1111111111111 11111111III II I x IIII111IIIIII IIII IIII � 1 IIII �f IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 I SECTION 1 I DS xo ', P a 8 11 1 3 I I I - 0 Iti -_- - -- N19'29'51 --- - - 1880 II 35.45' 9 1910 'W °s— � X 1 11 Fx.ReruL Te 1 990 Fo q 1 N49 55'3 o41 —r " 5 02'45'06 W I GHAMPgIGN g` ` R = 6'35P" PgR ER 2 Og �Z - 9J 91 18 G-0 -IRDLIg� w L = 79.73 56704'9 "E h = 79.67 273- 0113 DUNTINGTON RANK ZONE POD R M F \w 31 D = 26'21'47 R= 410.00' L = 188.65' I 1 Ch = 186,99 I 1 5 AG" E 1 IXREfAIL \ 1 I I 1118,&68 F.3 BUILDINGS) I I I r 1820 11 12]0 1220 1853 1 11 q 1 1 1 1Y10 .° 1 1 1 1 f 1 f `I L A �I �I�I lv l I I I I r I 0 90 / f l I q I gg r l 1 l tl I tl �� 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 U 1 16�� 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U 1 1 1 i DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. r 1r1+ + + +t + � I n�106d 0E'WM0TOk M-04An i t lrrlr + + + +t +1i� Ir Ir 1 + + +i �r l r l r l + + + + +i1� U U w= r + + +��titi 1 1 r rr + + + +1 +1 1 1 * + + + +t�y - I r l r l rrrr + + + +1 n rFf - +Fr+ 1111111 1 U 1 i 11111111 U U 1 � 1 � 1 � 1 � U 1 1 1 1 1 AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER SECTIO 1 1 1 G 1 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 +1 + + +t ��1i�irir 1 + 1 + 2�53i0 + 0 ®2 � + i 1 + i 1 � 1�1 1111 1i� �1 + +1 + + +i 1i I ZONEDPCD I rrr + +- 111111111 1 111111111 �Ii I l I l I li 111111111 1in � 111 I l I I I l l l l 393 Parking Spaces In We Half 280 Parking Spaces in East Half I�aalxaaal r 1 1 r� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ix 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� rrrY1 11 li- '45'06 'E 3.69' F1111116 III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1+ i 1 +1 { } +� + +i x + + + ++-I 1 1 -il L44F x1111111x IIIIIIII 11111 II1 Ii ey 11111¢ 1111111111111111111. I I,I 111 EX. BIKE 1 11 RACK 4 AIR 414 4 II P ,1, VIII U 1 1 1 111111FR11 11111 11111 111 11 � IIJI I � } + +I IIIi H + ++ +d+ ++ + + +i M 1 i I 111x11111 I Its 1111111 1111 eD 1111115 1111111111111111111 11 552 Parking Spaces V III F 1111111111111 11111111III II I x IIII111IIIIII IIII IIII � 1 IIII �f IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 I SECTION 1 I DS xo ', P a I I I I I 11 1 A I I I - 0 Iti -_- - -- N19'29'51 11a 111111 IIIIIIIII II 35.45' 9 uo N s — �o :— —e °s— � X 1 Ch 9 1 ' °4 "W I 1 990 Fo 10.211ACI 1 L R N49 55'3 o41 —r " 5 02'45'06 W 1 0 °450 5 8J °14'd4�£ 6.92' u X 11 - F'+C'DI °a O R __SL �„�— g 8 o III 1 8. _ 14343.5050' I 1 67 1 1 1111111 1 1111 S 9'14'5 E Oo 11 I I 29.92' ' S 045'06" W x IIIIIIIII II Ix I II 11 — 14.83' I 1 I I I 11..�ws.J1 ll II 11 l iiii '( F77- I I 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 q1 aw nV not. 19 6TO5��dOG8V7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20' Ea s II _ LOCATION MAP EL 1 11 Lan sca9e NO Scale 1 Ej I I Ifll I I II Ins 9J051 'osls O00e2 7 __— ___--- - -- ______— -- P .------ ^ ^•� 835'68' OPERTIES SECTION 2, EXISTING KROGER N -817 I ii - -F - _______ __________ T10N PGtT6FPERIMI Pedestrian Wlkw . Easement 1 Inst. 199705159900827 GROCERY STORE 1 11 20' X 100' '11 I .B. 108, PG. 6 a -- RESERVE'" BRICKa MASONRY BUILDING I n 5913881 S.F_ 1I N N IIII ]180 HOSPITAL DRIVE DUBLIN, OHIO 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 q '1 ? I, 1 1 1 , F I GHAMPgIGN g` ` R = 6'35P" PgR ER 2 Og �Z - 9J 91 18 G-0 -IRDLIg� w L = 79.73 56704'9 "E h = 79.67 273- 0113 DUNTINGTON RANK ZONE POD R M F \w 31 D = 26'21'47 R= 410.00' L = 188.65' I 1 Ch = 186,99 I 1 5 AG" E 1 IXREfAIL \ 1 I I 1118,&68 F.3 BUILDINGS) I I I r 1820 11 12]0 1220 1853 1 11 q 1 1 1 1Y10 .° 1 1 1 1 f 1 f `I L A �I �I�I lv l I I I I r I 0 90 / f l I q I gg r l 1 l tl I tl �� 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 U 1 16�� 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U 1 1 1 i DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. r 1r1+ + + +t + � I n�106d 0E'WM0TOk M-04An i t lrrlr + + + +t +1i� Ir Ir 1 + + +i �r l r l r l + + + + +i1� U U w= r + + +��titi 1 1 r rr + + + +1 +1 1 1 * + + + +t�y - I r l r l rrrr + + + +1 n rFf - +Fr+ 1111111 1 U 1 i 11111111 U U 1 � 1 � 1 � 1 � U 1 1 1 1 1 AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER SECTIO 1 1 1 G 1 1 r 1 r 1 r 1 +1 + + +t ��1i�irir 1 + 1 + 2�53i0 + 0 ®2 � + i 1 + i 1 � 1�1 1111 1i� �1 + +1 + + +i 1i I ZONEDPCD I rrr + +- 111111111 1 111111111 �Ii I l I l I li 111111111 1in � 111 I l I I I l l l l 393 Parking Spaces In We Half 280 Parking Spaces in East Half I�aalxaaal r 1 1 r� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ix 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� rrrY1 11 li- '45'06 'E 3.69' F1111116 III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1+ i 1 +1 { } +� + +i x + + + ++-I 1 1 -il L44F x1111111x IIIIIIII 11111 II1 Ii ey 11111¢ 1111111111111111111. I I,I 111 EX. BIKE 1 11 RACK 4 AIR 414 4 II P ,1, VIII U 1 1 1 111111FR11 11111 11111 111 11 � IIJI I � } + +I IIIi H + ++ +d+ ++ + + +i M 1 i I 111x11111 I Its 1111111 1111 eD 1111115 1111111111111111111 11 552 Parking Spaces V III F 1111111111111 11111111III II I x IIII111IIIIII IIII IIII � 1 IIII �f IIIIIIIIIII 1111111 I SECTION 1 1000 I 1 � 1Ti 1 1 = 1 I I Z OU]LQ] "A" 11 1.51ACRE I zoNED Pc0 25 BId9. W� 1 r E 273- 098 1 D= 60' 716 "n w 0NED Pco R 1 0G' 4A 'EF56L 9B Ex 50' B dl S etb S Sfi' S 6' E I �,� ' mo 1�1 Gull DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. xo ', P a I I I I I I I I ILVIQ 1 1 F] 1 A I I I - 0 Iti -_- - -- 11a 111111 IIIIIIIII II > 0 9 19 r.+ +++ 1 X 1 Ch 9 1 ' °4 "W o Fo 10.211ACI 1 1 1 1 1 1 N49 55'3 o41 1 1 I ZONd 1 IIIIIIIII III POST u X 11 - F'+C'DI °a O R o _ 1 67 1 1 1111111 1 1111 1 1 Oo I I "u� QCSgt- x IIIIIIIII II Ix DO 11 L1 - �+ ll II F77- II 1 1 1 1 q1 aw nV not. 19 6TO5��dOG8V7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20' Ea s m ant _ LOCATION MAP X 90 ' Lan sca9e NO Scale I Ifll I I Ins 9J051 'osls O00e2 7 __— ___--- - -- ______— -- �RT1aiTW .------ ^ ^•� 835'68' OPERTIES SECTION 2, IL4 1 I __- - -F - _______ __________ T10N PGtT6FPERIMI Pedestrian Wlkw . Easement L P ROAD ANIDTIIISION Inst. 199705159900827 101 I I I 20' X 100' T 1 SP PROPERTIES I .B. 108, PG. 6 RESERVE'" 1000 I 1 � 1Ti 1 1 = 1 I I Z OU]LQ] "A" 11 1.51ACRE I zoNED Pc0 25 BId9. W� 1 r E 273- 098 1 D= 60' 716 "n w 0NED Pco R 1 0G' 4A 'EF56L 9B Ex 50' B dl S etb S Sfi' S 6' E I �,� ' mo 1�1 PROPERTY OWNER: D DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. xo ', P a RETAIL SHOPPING 1 R 65.0 R 65.00 0 > 0 9 19 33 SITE X 1 Ch 9 1 ' °4 "W o Fo N49 55'3 POST ROAD °a O R o _ - I — PERIMETER ORmE I I "u� QCSgt- DO d� I I 111115/11 11 III LOCATION MAP NO Scale I Ifll I I co � IL4 1 I aV 1 101 I I I I AD 1 11 1 1 1 n ED q '1 ED IN1 I SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 111 , 1 l�o �A ZONING: 1 ��tiV ' -i ✓ r.a E t4n�= I N 85 °2010 51 0 699 63 2 1 � r r' e= 15'95 L 422.02 iJ f:� / + : i 1 1 1 '' 1 S774J 273-010472 / o WALGREEN CO. i 8805 HOSPITAL DRIVE F / -- _ +— �u ZONED PCD 1 II D= 56'43'39" / I R II / if L= 393.90' �I Cl II iF 5 28'02'42' W I ii iii I N I (_� scnfe r = so' _ -_ as T 0 60 120 IBO P9. 04 II IF - - Y -- __}_— GRAPHIC SCALE S1vLI P PROPERTY OWNER: D DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. xo ', P PROPERTY USE (LOT 2): R RETAIL SHOPPING PARKING TABLE DESCRIPTION IREQUIRED PROVIDED I RATIO EX.. SHOPPING CENTER 1 1,205 (1/171) 5.84 PER 1000S.F. (206,341 S.F) CITY OF DUBLIN PARKING CODE PER SECTION 153.212 = 5.5 PER 1000 S.F. THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER DUBLIN, OHIO Bird +Bull Cx 3. W% 4 mc . EXISTING CONDITIONS >mgi ^�ca mdBmacim Commho Ph: (6114 )761 761 -1661 661 8o JMDB 8L1325 SCALE: 1" = 60' JOB N0. WWW C1. DWN: SG CKD:AAG DATE: 6/2fi/10 OS -060 AM> A= 16'32'02' 1 A= 90'00'08" n�� > o P CH NIOM R = 650,92 11 R - 65.00 a 2 y3_0 _ - - - ERI�E7g$ OR �Ew��y, AO] L ° 18 "� >fb Ch = 91,92 33 0 SITE 03'3Q45" _ - L = 79 ]j0 58] 045] E N49 °55'34' = ' I I 6 POST h 69.63 273- 01GTON _ 20.74' 51'19" E E NUNIINGTON HANK fl� wM' -- -- 1 Bono JJ 80'0556" 3 90° ZONED Poo R M F Il r _ " sir o -- PERIMETER DRIVE Prop. I L = 188.65' _ - _ _ _ _ DO Slgnument I I Ch 18699' - LIT 5 4l E ` w 'a IXIRET�L l IX aeTeNnaN 1 1 1 ', f� 11 LOCATION MAP POND 1115,&68 F.3 BUIlDI11B5) 1 1 I I o�ll III Na sane g 11 1280 j 1270 I I 1 I 1255 8i 1 1 A 1Yl-0 ' F S 111007 l e I I 1 -- - / A 1 1 r/// A/ L I I 11 t l . 050 I I IO I l 1 1 I SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION / 7 1 III I I i I O6B 1 1 1 1 1 xrl lar 1 r i gg gg 1 01 1000 1 / AD n4 as / / ull ZONING: 13M / I ( 8 1 8 1 `eI %i/ /' <A v / / IN Ii � PROPERTY OWNER: DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. 1 -Z Im I PROPERTY USE LOT 2 1510 1 1 I I RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER I -T ( ) I D3 -00 I�1 I - _ II .. 1 PROPERTY USE (LOT 1 I I ( ) GROCERY STORE 1320 OIRLQ7 A 11 I I I1 ' 1.5 ACRES I �. � I SITE ACREAGE (LOT 2). 15.05 AC. 159 L Z PcD t 7 I IIIIIIIIIIIII III 111111111111111 1I z In SITE ACREAGE LOTS: r ( ) 10.21 AC. I I I I I I I I I I I _ D1 I - -- - -- - g I Id �I I I I 1 1 1 1 I/ SITE ACREAGE (TOTAL). 25.26 AC. I1 ' DUBLIN OAKS LTD. � 1/ III III 11 1111 II 11 11 IIIIn= II N I � , 6d0GWM0TOM04A 1 a A - I � / . 1 � EXISTING ZONING: PCD IIIIII 1 rrr + + + + +i ++ + + + ++ ss S) r/�. //r/r/rr // r II 90 1 A VV / / Iv PROPOSED ZONING: PUD 1 Il i I i� 1 i Ii�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I RH�� I i Ii� p ', Eat I ck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIII I I I 1 1�� arlung � E_. zs a1dq. as Parking se+he ADJACENT ZONING NORTH: PCD Ly � / 11111111111 1 '1 9' 3 ADJACENT ZONING SOUTH: PUD FX. RETAIL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w 276.65 RI '� 9 ADJACENT ZONING EAST: w rrrr + + + + + + + + + + + ++ t rrrrr + + ++ 1 V a PUD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 t i r t 1 ) ) 1 t,1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 t: >I Ez.?5' eldg_�?arkin seroaek n ADJACENT ZONING WEST: PUD 11 1 AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER IS ° / r / . ° z II ^d n PEE Qp/� TI I ar 1 ` 1 T r 1 /// e rr X11 t I SITE LAYOUT DATA: QN1111 IIIIIIIIII IilllI I 1 I11111 (.1111 1,1111 y OT 11111 1111111:1111 11.1111 f 1 _ I n I 1 1 1 1 1 1 +1 1 1� lrr 3L++OtI + +i +I� I rrr + + + + +y +� fit �nrr+ + ++ + +i- Iy� + + + + ++ 1: _ 1 I� MINIMUM EXISTING DRIVE 1 fit 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r,1 1 1 1 t i 1 1 1 1. °, ly� � AISLE WIDTH: 22' - 1111111 111115b5AG11i 1111111 11111 1111111 11:1111 _ - L - FUTURE OUTPARCEL : 1 - L T = 1 ^ STANDARD PARKING STALL: 9.5'x 19.5' ZONED PCD i1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1: 1 1 1 3 ACRES 1 1 1 1 1 1 x 1 1 1 1 1. - - w �' I I ° c PARKING SETBACK / BUFFER: 26' / 30' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D.1 1 1 1 1 6.1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 C - e 2]3'008 Il �)I ', ° rrrr+ ++ -t +Hy+ rrr ++ t + -lt + ++ li - Ovn.OT•B• 11 BUILDING SETBACK: 50' t r. i - 1.esncnES 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 II 1 � 1 PROP. BUILDINGS. F.: 1201 I�I 1 1� 11 1 11111:111 I I a -11111 11..11 111 70NEDPCD Or - �� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e - S o 1 I II ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE Spam In West Half PC 993 Parking Pa I I I II i (FUELIMPROVEPoFNTS ONLYk 14,205 S.F. 1 1 1 _ iI11111 .1111 111111 i1 Ii.i 11 - I N19'i9'si' / /. 1 I o ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE -- 35.45' i m s I� f 1 T i (FUEL,Q�/�L, uas- / v� S 86'1434 uos - E / 1 '� DRIVE RuPROVEIVENI 39,087S.F. 11� 11 0� 111 „ 19e7 640.33 'I j 11, T S 02'45'06" W __ -_- / I _ -- 140 fig 11 3 uo N 0'45'06" E � A= 88'20'25' ZONED PCD E 11 5 86'14 v4-£ 6.92' 85'2010 F / - N - _ - R = 50,.49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A= 50'37 / _ L 6].85 S 3 4 E _- y2 - - -- 197 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 R= 100.00 r w+. - Ch - 70.37 1 8. II 143.50 N 2'45'06'E _ 0' FaiWa 1 tC _ - - - _ -' "0111 �_JL 5 86'14'54" E 5 23.69' Ch = 100.94 1 �:� - J6 _ @ } N3J'12'9 'E 20.92' S 02'45'08" W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V (� 1 1 1 1 1 00. �4 ATER - 14.83 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i S 56'Sfi'i 6" E Ey,. 9s) 11 11 1111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IVI + + + ++-I / eE 11 � I 1 I J 1r�aq I Pr 1 0p- I Corf Conrail 1 1 II 1 1 FATP I Conrail / �� u -1 1 11 ii 4 4118 414 4 ��/ f I fti /�� w S d d d d 6 16 1 1 Prop. / A= 6'66 51 B Ei% A- 15'05'15" lur0 I� V Monument b /// - 1 q II 1 / / R = 420.00,' R - 42202 1 II I P Hdn Sign / L = 111.13 La 1 . 382 e g Spaces L = 51.05' 01 %% Ch = 110.81 o0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ch s. 1� � V III V III 111111 1111111 / Z = 5]]'46$3 "W w / / � r /• ` 559'S3'D W 2LGREE CO. 72 EXISTING KROGER N 817 tt 11� 1 - 1 11 +i + ++ + + + ++ +1-+ + 6 1 +++ -1�+ / / h s l •1 11 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e / o 5HOSPI AL GROCERY STORE I 1 1 1 1 1�1 1 1 cart 1 1�1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 9 / E/ / o ^0, I I BRI �% - 8805 HOSPITAL DRIVE u Corral PROP FUEL / 3 / a - CKA MASONRY BUILDING Carro CENTER o a ° � / /� - Eu II 5B,3B513.F.. 1 �GTI II I_ IIIIIIII 111 - 7100HOSPITALDRNEDOBLIN,OH10 I I I I I I I I V I I I gN l i l I I I m/ % � v n `^ Il I °"1z L + ++H + // - - - 1 1 17 1 115:09 15 "' / e i/ = i- PARKING TABLE 111 - A. q / /� ♦ / t - SCALE: Y = 60' 111 - 16.21 dC. 0 1 / a 1 � _ 0 60 120 180 DESCRIPTION REQUIRED PROVIDED RATIO I l l �V 1 ZONED PCD m / a rc 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1 O Ex SHOPPING CENTER 1.135 1,205 (1/171) ' ma l I t GRAPHIC SCALE 205,341 &F) 584 PER 1000 S.F. II 111111 11111 111111 ZOF 1 1 1 + + + + 1 1 1 a 'I - i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 E is ` w s 1 1 e= sfi'a3'39•• SHOPPING w/ NEW FUEL an 11 �. 1 1 Cart J'S, * i L II CENTER &ENTRANCE 11135 861 (1/237) 4.22 PER 1000 S.F. R = 393.85' Cart ! L = 393.90 Corral ' 20,6,CHANGES - OUTF.) 453 S.F. Ch= ' "°' CITY OF DUOLIN PARKING CODE PER SECTION 153.212 = SS PER 1000 SF. 1 1 1 1 1 II g m 14 5 28'02X +2' 47 W Owner: Date: II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 e o0, el 0 1 7 1 1 1 _ THE AVER - - -� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iii 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 Y ROAD RETAIL CENTER 1 1i 1 Prop. DUBLIN, OHIO II -- - Manu e t o ___ W 1----- - -~--- - -f `�° - - - -- - - - - HOSPITAL PROPERTIES SECTION 2, -- - -- -� sq -- -$- Appl and Zoning Commission Secretary: Date: Date: y -- Plan icanY. - - -- - - -___ ___- __6]141 TZV -_ -1- }_ _ _ _ ___ ___ ___ ____ __ p ,�JJ p __ - -_ � � - - - - - -- , ... n.° 83566 B(rU + Gull Tuuu _ ______ _ ___ -1 -11 ON PLAT PERIMETER- 11 cr.7lomaa.aBU7.L,¢vc, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT DEDI - -- L P DTHER EIU ON9 1 I 1 1 - tt 2575w 1iv- mmdlleRa.a PLAN T 1 ASP PROPERTIES pp�7�pp -- - -+ -- kMb a Ol 03 3 ♦ SJ:CT100LlADOl11Q� - - -y- Ph: (610)76 -132 B. 108, PG. 8 \ - - + -- A¢ SCALE: 1" = 60' 006 60 RFFFRVF / - - + -- Planning and Zaning. Commission Approval: Dote: wv7NplRnpm lSYlM 0WN -4O CkO: AAG IRATE R /9fi/10 05 -060 G1.5 _ z _ R i6 b2' I I 1 90'00 ¢ p B ANK �_ R = 8T84 , R 65 00 i 3_G1154 _ — _ _ — — — — _ _ _ Eg � as _ � i cn = 91.9z o SITE E$f� EF aro 8= 07OJ5'0 L = 1 �1 87 L = 102.10 33 00 --155177 //—�p� 03'3Q45" _ — E\�w L = Jg J� 56704'S7'E N49 °55'34 "W = . ` I 6 PosI n 796T 273- 011344 _ 20.,4' 51'19" E E NUNTINGTON D/ ANK fl� w - - _ wM' -- -- / Sono JN 80'0556" 3 90" ZOmzo Poo R M F 11 r _ " sir o 1 1 I — PFRimF LED ok[W R= 410.00' �\ w 'a — �— F Prop. I I L = 188.65' _ _ _ DO Mo I �Ch = 18699' Sig 1 5 E ` 'a IXIRETAIL ry u/ l EX RETENTION 1 1 POND 1 &68 F. �T� BUIIDITJbS) / I IL ) 1 1 1 \ t�I I LOCATION MAP 1115, S 11 j 190 1 8 1 1285 I 1255 B 1]2-0 .° p 1 1 11007 I rl I AI Il gh l ` l• No Scale 1200 1 1 J2 l I 1 — — —— FL.zL� FC E I 1p I I r_ 1 t 10 1 , i l I SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 1 I t f 1 Ifu 1 1 1 1 I 1 i I WD A 11 1 1 x11 gar 1 r i 1 1 01 1000 1i 1 / °A >i7 °' / / ul ` ZONING: 1 � 1 M 1300 .. / I r 8 1 8 1 E.1 ii/ /' <A a / / T a, tN I � BIKE 1 - 1 1 - 11 'KL I I I PROPERTY OWNER: DUBLIN OAKS, LTD. 1310 PROPERTY USE (LOT 2): RE 1 o I m h l I TAIL SHOPPING CENTER -- - „ I D3- ao 820 t I s _ o , PROPERTY USE (LOT 3): GROCERY STORE 1320 L OIRLQ] "A" 1 It 1. PROP. IKE (' I I1 ` m 1.5 1ACRE3 T / I �. � 1 SITE ACREAGE (LOT 2). 15.05 AC. RACK Pco I L SON 1 la 1111111111111 111 111111111111111 11 z m SITE ACREAGE (LOT !- ( ) 10.21 AC. 1��i 1 1 111111111111 _ IxF I - --- - --- - - - g � 1 1d �I 1 1 1 ' ' 1 1 tF SITE ACREAGE (TOTAL). 25.26 AC. 11 DUBLIN PUD OAKS LTD. kv 1 111 111 11 1111 11 1 1111111111 ryc nc 11111 N 1111 �6d0GWM0TE��04A 11111111111 1111111 111111111 I I a A - F F . 1 EXISTING ZONING: PCD l rrr - + + + +t 1 �� rrrrr + + + + + +ti ++ rrrr + + + + + +ti rr + + + ++ I rrr + + + + +i1+ + + + ++ I FF S) 1 11 11111 F V F F F V F F F F F F F F F „ F 1 �nr 1n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1nr 1 1 1 1 A VV 1v 1 1I V 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i V 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i U � 1 i 1 i 1 H U 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E_. zs a1d9. W� Pan<Ing sema PROPOSED ZONING: PUD up '` ADJACENT ZONING NORTH: PCD � 111111111111 1 '1 9' 3 ADJACENT ZONING SOUTH: PUD E%. RETAIL 1111111 (IIIIIIII 111111 IIIIIIIIII VIII III (III IIIIIIIII1111 W 2,, ADJACENT ZONING EAST: + + + + + + + + 1rlrrrrr + + + +1 +1 1 1 r + + + + + + ++ 1 a PUD w > I E.. zs Bidg_ w?orkin seroack n c=i ADJACENT ZONING WEST: # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1I 1 1 1 1 1 I� � I111�I111 1 I1� o 'A ° I I ' N A0 Easement ° AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER FF �F FF FF �F FII 1 1 1 1 1 SEC QM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ins eo2n 8c0364t 1 m f 1 '� tl1 I n tl t SITE LAYOUT DATA: 11 1r 1 + + + +t 1 �� rrrr I I I I I I1 + +++ ++ MINIMUM EXISTING DRIVE 1 2�i310t1A2 1 1 1 1 - 1I 1I�11 11 1I� 1 11 1 I� �11 1 1 11 �11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 r - tLi z AISLE WIDTH: 22' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46 b5 AC1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -- F r _1 T I° STANDARD PARKING STALL: 9.5'x19.5' ZONEDPCD _ tl E i A e` PARKING SETBACK / BUFFER: 26'/ 30' 1111111111111111111 111111111 1111111111 111111 1111111 11111 1111111111 - e� 2�3 -9oe n`,o 3 + + + +�yy + 1 r 1 rr 1 rrt- +. + + ++ r + + + +�yy + + 1 rr 1 r 1 rrr - + + ++ lrlr 1 1 1 Dvn.oTs i d BUILDING SETBACK: 50' ________ 1.55 ,- x nL J(�L - � Fo Pco tt PROP. BUILDINGS. F.: 120± V 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 V 1 1i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i i zOry 1 1 1 1 1 1� �b 1 , t , a 111111 11111111 1 1 1 n ADDITIONAL GREENSPACE: 99 3 Parkin Spam In West Ha f 280 Parkin Spaces in East He6 9 Pa 9 P -. � Ib I - a �1a g1 r m �-'n t n (FUEL IMPROVEMENTS ONLYk 14,205 S.F. 111 _ m N19'zg'st mn k �- /. t 1 I I ADDRONAL GREENSPACE sA' e — °C „ p 35.as' / f� � (FUEL AND DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS): 30,758 S.F. —„DA— / m 1 r 1T 5 ) S 87'14'54" E 1390 540.33 ' Pro 25 Ensemeok 89 i F -- S 02'4506" W - - - -- Drive 1 — B B6 PGS.86— — P 0.fi 3 uo N 0 4506 E 6.92' _ 10 E D= 88'20'25" S 8714'S4£ N 85 °2 _ _ — ________ R — 50. a9 � - -- F � Pro Entr �1 IIIIIIII 1111111111111 p y / — L =77.85 9] 1 IS 1 1 T1 4" E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Drive _ R n- OF - 70.37 N 2as'O6 "E F°°�'° F — —— 1 8. p 143.50' — N3J'12'9 'E 5 23.69 R 100.00 F — � � � _JL s 87 2' E _ % Y — _ L - mss0' F } 2 0. 2' s ozas'o6" w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � a `ea 14.83 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ch 6' 100.94' I Z 1 h 1 1 Y + ++i tit +++ S 56'S61fi E / ll 1 �I1 1 i t I 1 II I I� I r r.. agJl I- EX. BIKE RACK M -� 5'0 5'15 1 P� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /E 4 414 414 4 11 TI G�/ 4FZ, 1 15 / i e= 6'5751" S S6 di G d 6 PraP' 1' t h �piq 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / mr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Monument e /// v i/ F F t R= 420 A= .00' , p 1 1 1 PROP. CART Sign �/ / L = 51.05' R _ 11 _ 60 20 fin 2202 t SCALE. 1 "= 66' CORRAL i Cn = 51.02' CF — '33 "W 0 II° 1 1 1 V I I I 1 1 1 1 A 559'53'27 "W 7] ' / '4733 "W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o F 104 EXISTING KROGER N -817 / / crzAVnrc scacc h � E L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� \ a / o WALGR IPI 1 11 1 1 LJ P w° o ! 1111 111 11 111111 / �, r11 }�, - GROCERY STORE 1I / O i/ _ _ TA DRNE ^a ` -- Y RICKB MASONRYBUINING II 1 382 Parking Nile Spa I E PROP. FUEL CENTER a° % 8805 HOSPI L I a Q' / i / t °� 111 � ae,aeeaF_ 1 � _ ZONED PCD �N6 u1 � ISEC1fION111 1 1 1 A h r h - + -- 1 j1 I mP ]100 HOSPITAL DRIVE DUBLIN °OHIO I I I I I I I //�}y11I L, 1s PARKING TABLE I `I I = wE, 11 0 1 AC. Prop m i i e ° � � � e — � _ DESCRIPTION REQUIRED PROVIDED RATIO ZONED PO➢ storm s (l iI EX. SHOPPING CENTER 1 1,221 (1/167) 5.92 PER 1000 S.F. 11 _ 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a.8rai H� O t i/ Ex 6 son (206,341 S.F) vo 11 111111 11111 111111 1 1 , z 7 -- rr + + + + + + + + + + + ++ PrOP. w °' 1 t SHOPPING w/ NEW FUEL a l - - L 1 1 1 1 1 1 V AR 11 E 15 1205E s I/ A= 58'43'39" CENTER & ENTRANCE 11 111111 IIIII 111111 e 1 V K'oek. 1'd* paWt I1. R = 39785' CHANGES 1,136 1,015 (1/203) 4.92 PER 1000 S.F. PROP. �I CORRAL T !j L = 393.90' (246,457 SF.) m Ch = 378.01' 11 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 CITY OF DUBLIN PARKING CODE PER SECTION 153.212 = S5 PER 1400 S.F. °o II 1 II g m . Fe ;� 1 S28'0242'W 1t 1 I / Y ROAD RETAIL CENTER J owner: Date III : II 1 IIIII ggq'a ¢y1E65Eeht11198 Prop, e1 � THE AVER ED e mant - lost% l s sadpbe�7 y - Slg e t sa�Psery © DUBLIN. OHIO M It Applicant. Dote: os1s ppaez7 zo Landsecpe Eaeement I Q T487141TZV -- -- Ins __ _ 635.66 Ho PITALPROPERTIESSECTION2. Bird ro' DtFt a - _t - _ - +Bull FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN �'IIIIII - ____I ____ - _� _J_ __ _____ T10NPLAT6FPERIMETER -L-S- "a R 5E. Tt cr.s®era.a BUW ¢vc. Pedestrian Wmw . Easement O.R. 31836, Pg. en 0F 11 11 Planning — - -Y -- g and Zoning. Commission Secretary: Date: Inet. 199705150000827 L P D THE RE EL M5W. f vJ � 0 omS R FOR 20' x ,00' r 1 PROPERTIE gy m+ 0235 S�cnoeuADD�K -- 5 KROGER N817 FUEL CENTER ST IW 1 1661 .8. PG. 6 -- —' + —' 800(614) 761 -1329 SCALE: 1" = 60' JOB N0. RESERVE / -- - - + -- Planning and Zoning. Commission Approval: Date: a r. Op6{ AWN: SC cRD AAC DATE. 6/26/10 05 -060 C1.6 45.7J' ❑ - - - - - - -Ex. 24" storm Sewer _ --------- - - - - -- - ----------------- In' V LANDSCAPE AREA kLT \ \ IIINININ r'll 1 Iyl ��T mmmc\mm1 1 rT - 1 IDSCAPE AREA 25 ��Cr =_`� --Lt LiJ-- Lrv�cJ,tLy� 11 J T�II Immmnurldlmmnrinlnl GIIIm - - -— �L e 1 I I �ITI'I'I'I�I 'I'I= 1'I'I�I'.'IIr'Il'I'�"r'II� mmvvmmL� T �� II (�� III II III T1 Hill — �mmmRl __ OII I I L I II UII IfiIIU II ril l i 1 1 Ul I IIITI11 4L o-ll I�Rl l II � W a 11 TRANSFORMER J- 611111 II JU PROP. 12' STORM SEWER ( IIf7dlN �filBfi&IWIDWJ! WllNlllllllllllfllll r �� 1 I ___ I Ii� — III IIII __ Fmm11JT -- o-lTlll T,II L+� IL —�i J 1 ii ii �RHNHH ' G a -�_3 CAR L m -J Il cull�� uum 6 STACKING a KR m I UIIIDI�IIU uuul Pff C N817 LLW I ��I�p I. o- llll }Iijl IIIIIIYU X 1� ou h ruwwuulL �� - - -__ ulmmnmmmmn! � mmmm�rrr SPILL KIT 1 1 1 - II I OO An rY _ __ M- ENCLOSURE ° - _ ��- III - VENT STACKS r_ 11 - --�I a` - -_ —_ - - -- _— OF UNDERGROUND IL —JI I IL —J CANOPY ROOF v �� (� L = CENTER EL TANKS 000 o 0 =.gyp � v ° ry ° fi e° x REFERENCE MAP SCALE T' =zoo' � \_/° ° Ev - ALAI � P ° �I -111 w ° o ° �L -3I p ° , I L wJ� II I o us ° �q El C C w25� ❑p ns' 1 UP Fv P ❑ . �F�� Ti4ASH. RECEPTICLF P❑ r,�— ❑� F � a p 13' -g' BRICK COLUMN ° v ° ❑ ° ° .r wU4(TO. MATCH STORE) ° - BUMP (TYW 1111 o o II1 o IIIt °��i I CANOPY ROOF i t LIMIT OF r -1 r -11 III- -JII CONCRETE APRON IL JII III- -JII A� -- P Ex. Light Pole PROP AIR STATION - III PROP. SANITARY P SERVICE LANDSCAPE - - - -- I. AREA i - -__— ___ - - T - I1 EX. OAm 1 ISLAND, ND, T To \ REMAIN PROP. FUEL SIGN - v Fv Ex. CURB y ill � s - _P 12" STORM I I I II \1 X1 1 I 1 1 Ir j 11 L -� EX. Sto sower _ LEGEND _ • 0 omits of Proposed Concrete LANDSCAPE AREA THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER DUBLIN, OHIO z � Bird +Bull FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/CONDITIONAL USE S CALE, C 10 ° `E ag . °' FUEL CENTER DETAIL AND 0 0 0 m5w. u6 ` O od Com STACKING EXHIBIT mhoq ONo 03235 GRAPHIC SCALE Ad(614)761 -1661 Pnc(614) 761 -1328 " SCALE: 1 = ID' JOB No. C� B WWW.BIItDHULLCOM DWN:SG CKD:AAG DATE: 6/26/10 OS -060 ZONED pNatcm BAN 01A5 _ I I - - - - _ -- 2]3-011304 -- w _ l NUNTINGTON HANK _ �wm zorro pco _ --- s 1 l e p,ma � e I I I 1 EX RETENTION IXIRhTAIL w � 1 POND 118,&68 F.31BOTH BUILfNNBS) / ' ll, ) � ^I $ 1200 190 I 1 1280 1 1265 1 I Igl tao 9 � 1 �11aeB /�°./ / / � �� 11 1 li 9 1 1 1 r li l 1 1 1 / O I L 1 101 I I1 9v /, r� N u 1� 1 FUEL CENTER &CART CORRAL 1000 % / A I I � N I ` _ ` I � � I I F771 KRO IMPROVEMENTS TO BE GI 1810 1 I IVI I V I D3- 00020�Y -T. CONSTRUCTED BY THE NROGER COMP ANY. 11 I i I 1320 1 F 1 OU]LQf "A" II L f I L .51 ACRES ____ ___ _ 1 ....... FUTURE ENTRY DRIVE AND PARKING LO I I T I I L ZONED MODIFICATIONS TO BE DESIGNED AND , 1 ............... 1880 I. .............. a xcl® �i 1 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 li I I% CONSTR HE CITY OF DUBLIN AS II PART OF F THE THE AV ERY- MUIRFIELO ROA - II IMPROVEMENTS. THE OWNER, DUBLIN OAKS IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII I III IIII II I Illlllllllrvcn V III N I LTD.. SHALL BE REP SONSIB C FOR 1111111 1111111111 1 11111111111 1111111 111111111 1111 1 V A LANDSCAPING THE AREA DRIVE Fr +Y + + + + +y+ rY + + + ++ s6B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AA IA \Y CO MPLETE O ION OF THE DRIVE IS 1 1 1 1�1 I I I I 1 1 li 1�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� �1 1�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I H�1 I I I I CO MPLETE D 1 � o' 1 IIIIIII III 11 1111 co I 1 311 m� tI ` PARKING E ISLANDS TO STATIONS AND E%. RETAIL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 19 �� tO T HE KROCER ca AT S E ILAND TIME As CONSTRUCTED + + + + + + + + +- rrrrr + + + ++ LAN r + + + + + + + + +trrrrr + + ++ 1- i- tFr } + }7�11�� I- FFi- � } + + +�1�� I 1 �� n M TH m. CO �I InI� u � z 1 1 1 I � I 1 1 1 l l l V V 1 i l i i i i i i i l i l i� l i l i i i i i i THE NEW ENTRY DRIVE IS COMPLETED. IIII I I I I IIII I III II 111111 IALTIII p��L Tv IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII V III IIIIIIIIII (IIII 1 1 MODIFICATIONS TO THE ACCESS DRIVE I + + + + + + + + +y� rrFrY + + + +l +yyyyl I I l l lr l + + + + +yy Yt + + + ++ rFrY + + ++ +may +l I I I + + + + ++ I -- I I � SHALL BE MADE BY THE OWNER AT SUCH I TIME AS THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE �li 11 Il i IIII I� - 1 111 I'A IIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIII II � IIII II I IIII _ - - - - - -- - - �_J I �'n ENT DRIVE ARE COMPLETED B E 1 1 V T II ENTRY T Y TH I I I - I I clTr OF DUBLIN. all 273 -00820 - r 11111111111111 111111111111 } {z- ro I 'B' + +. + +Fyy1 +1 +1 i i Ir l rrr + + ++ rrrrr ++ + + + +y + +1 1 1 1 rrr+ + + + + +y + + ++ 011NAT , I n d ACRE I t.85 1 A zary ED Pc0 u V 1 I1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I1 V I Ii I I I I I I I C 111111111 1 11111 11111 11111111111 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 _ I i ii ii IIIIIII 11111 - I I a ala si r>aj 1 - p I II I - I _ �zA — ° °v —o°v— FUTURE RNE I G � //� / tC 11 8 11 0: i I vo: D \ 1990 11 III I L R I -. _ _ F — _ II - -- 19]0 - - - -- IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII - I FUTURE. ENTRY ORI e3WIS W.w 1 11 l li ++ + + + + ++ +++ ++ + +++ Ir�w�.J1 1 1 11 1 Ii Ii�1i Ii�1i '° \�� /�/ IX. DRIVE T00E REMOVED I j fl "� "` ` v v� I II CUT 1 Ik° iii a 6l 6 6l a a o �m 1 1 11 II 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 iii \� \ \V \ \V + N I I 111 1 1 1 11111 11111 111111 I II vv o n� �I 1 11 0 1 1 44 GER N -817 Ii '� \ // ✓ / o~ 1 w I I 1 h a l 11 EXISTING IERO m a; - }`;g, II GROCERY STORE ! 1 1,� c S / /'�� a a II l r BRICK& MASONRY BUILDING I 89.301 BOB MN� II I T100 HOSPITALDRIVE DUBLIN, / 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I I a•P n v I \�- + + + + - + + ++ + + + + + III - III -\ IIIIIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /, •/ F �{- -- a I r 11 D uI I 1111 11111 111111 / 1 1 1 1 1 i li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /i s/� / 11111 .111111 1 n I/ II I1 F II II - - -PIT 1 1 1 1 1 T i �I li 1 1 l "'I THE AVERY ROAD RETAIL CENTER DUBLIN, OHIO ____ ___ _________ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ I� SCALE. )" = 60 w L4 - _ Lr v -1 -} 1 0 60 120 WE — = -t Bird +Bull - - -- DF•�•�+• �D• FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ___________________________ __ __ II I __ - -Y -- creavllze scazE lmgwm�md8mavyve - t __ m ew. mm-mmnmm6 CONSTRUCTION EXHIBIT _= t Cmm(40Ma 32A6 - t — Flu (614)761 -1661 F¢ + -' (614) 761 -11328 SCALE: 1" C 60' JOB N / _ - + -- WWW.BOtDHULLCOM DWN: SG ED. ANC DATE: e /zfi /10 Ds -060 60 G7.7 GENERAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS SET IN THE USA STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. 2. ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS SHALL ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. 3. PLANT LOCATIONS AND BEDS SHALL BE LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. MULCH HEDGES IN A CONTINUOUS BED. 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 ". 6. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE FERTILIZED WITH 10 -10 -10 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 7. SODDING BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 8. THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 9. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE RESTORED, FINE GRADED AND SEEDED/ SODDED. 10. ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS TO BE PRESERVED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. INTERIOR LOT COVERAGE COMPARISONS ONLY INCLUDES THE ACREAGE WITHIN THE PARCEL OCCUPIED BY KROGER EXISTING VUA /GREENSPACE - VEHICULAR USE AREA 1 270,643 S.F. - INTERIOR GREENSPACE 1 17,109 S.F. 6.3% TREES PHASE 1 VUA /GREENSPACE - VEHICULAR USE AREA 1 263,288 S.F. - INTERIOR GREENSPACE 1 21,995 S.F. 8.4% PHASE 2 VUA /GREENSPACE - VEHICULAR USE AREA 243,025 S.F. - INTERIOR GREENSPACE 18,729 S.F. 7.7% 2" CAL. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: O LAWN AREA, PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACROSS ALL SURFACES. O LANDSCAPE AREA, PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACROSS ALL SURFACES. O3 MULCH BED AREA. PLANT LIST (CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANTS SHOWN ON PLAN) L ------------- � % LIMITS OF PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE 1 U O S duos JJS ----------- LIMITS OF PHASE 1 LANDSCAPE SEE SHEET -2 FOR ENLARGEMENT I 1 I I l o ■■ � I 1 \ srm jjr � - -- F � b -- - -- -- - - - - -- - - — 4 UM - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - • - - h - n - - - - I F '�� — —� T ■ ��/ — .-- —� ■ + + Ex. Water TT-1 �--------- - - -�e— — I � _ Feature • ■ 1 1 III I � � II h � � '�� ■ 1 I I L— d; 1 2 � III I •�r =� 1� I � I I I� I I I I I � I I I � � ;� / �� — I — ll —� F — �I �— 1 1 III I 11 I I � � ■ ' ; iii; �, %,, ��,, III I � II 1 6 I 1 �� ■ %/ �;�;;:;� , i , w III LIMITS OF PHASE 1 �■ ■ ' S LT LANDSCAPE 1 �,,,,,, . 1 Ear I� Ear I� E� (• 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 ■1 I I; %; ,� �� SEE SHEET L -2 FOR �;'; ■I— —I — %, r TTREE III TYPICAL E;; % % "� • Ea e ra IIr�� .� 1 1 ■I 1 • V III a ENLARGEMENT � 3 U r srm MA E ♦ ■ ' ' 6 RSP III ' L✓ i' < III i � I I I I I ■I II I IZ1 I �• fl 11 I� I I I ,r is r � r i J I I I r— f 3 I I I I I • I —1— !— 1 e I I■ I_ I I I 1 ■ � I_ I I — I _ I_ EXISTING KROGER SUPERMARKET 101 , r O 4v CBF 4WAN ■ ■ ■► UM ♦ �,,,; T P SE 1 ND P _— s I I -- ■ 9 MC - -� D5M -- L 1111111 -`OS �� 6 MA , �; i < ✓i �, 1 1 � __ -- -- 1- - -! ■ �- aooI GBP Awl 'i,' j, '� ;� �,' low dool_ 1 1111 � � I I III �1 �� ■ :, ; ' � ';;;: i � 1 i i ' � 1 L A ■ I ■11 I �. 1 1111 I 1 1 I I I � o D — � — — — -- -- — — — o Do TL T T I II I 1 1 1 ■ �� - -- 1 1 \ - - i — ■ 111111 \\ — � \s -- In 4 UMA - - - - - -- — — -------- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- _ — �— —s— - - -T ` -7 - - -- �� -- 9t —- F T_ _ �(___ _ _ _ti_ _ y H__ __ _ 1 J�u __L —__ - -_ -- s�= =— ��— __—--- L ------------- � - - -- vni\-- - - - - -- _ SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 = 50' QTY KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COND. REMARKS TREES r ' 4 CBF CARPINUS BETULA'FRANZ FONTAINE' FRANZ FONTAINE HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 10 GBP GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 12 MMC MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRABAPPLE 2" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 7 LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2.5" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 3 STREET TREE RELOCATED OR REPLACED STREET TREE BY DUBLIN 6 RSP ROBINIA PSUEDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2.5" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 12 UM ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2.5" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM 29 LIMA ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2" CAL. B & B MATCHED FORM J= Z O Z ~ W cz K U SHRUBS 9 TOT THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'TECH NY' MISSION ARBORVITAE 4' HGT. B & B 43 JHY JUNIPERUS CONFERTA'BLUE PACIFIC' BLUE PACIFIC JUNIPER 18" SPRD. CONT. z 91 EAR EUONYMUS ALATA'RUDY HAAG' RUDY HAAG BURNING BUSH 24" HGT CONT. 30 JCH JUNIPERUS CHINESIS HETZII HETZ BLUE JUNIPER 24" HGT.. CONT. 203 TMD TAXUS X MEDIA 'DENSIFORMIS' DENSE YEW 24" HGT. CONT. pNj � C Q 32 BWG BUXUS MICROPHYLLA'WINTER GEM' WINTER GEM BOXWOOD 24" HGT CONT. 71 CMP CHAMAECYPARIS PISIFERA 'FILIFERA MOPS' GOLD MOP FALSE CYPRESS 24" HGT.. CONT. 86 VDR VIBURNUM DENTATUM 'RASPBERRY TART' RASPBERRY TART VIBURNUM 30" HGT. CONT. PERENNIALS 88 MS MISCANTHUS SINENSIS 'MORNING LIGHT' MORNING LIGHT MAIDEN GRASS 2 GAL. CONT. N 48 PRA PEROVSKIA ATRIPLICIFOLIA RUSSIAN SAGE 1 GAL. CONT. �—I 194 HSD HEMEROCALLIS STELLA D' ORRO STELLA D' ORRO DAYLILLY 1 GAL. CONT. DIVIDE AND RELOCATE EX. 166 NWL NEPETA'WALKER'S LOW' WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 1 GAL. CONT. PROJECT 49 RPK ROSA'RADCON' PINK KNOCKOUT ROSE 2 GAL. CONT. 123 SL SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA DUCK POTATO PLUG 110 SP SCIRPUS PUNGENS COMMON THREE SQUARE PLUG 25 IV IRIS VERSICOLOR NORTHERN BLUE FLAG TUBER 49 CAK CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFOLIA'KARL FORESTER' KARL FORESTER GRASS 1 GAL. CONT. 144 SSA SEDUM SPECABLE 'AUTUMN FIRE' AUTUMN FIRE SEDUM 1 GAL CONT. 26 SNM SALVIA NEMOROSA'MAY NIGHT' MAY NIGHTSALVIA 1 GAL CONT. 94 SDC SILENE DIOICA'CLIFFORDS MOORE' CLIFFORDS MOORE CATCHFLY 1 GAL. CONT. PLANT KEY TYPICALS SEE PLANT LIST FOR SPECIFIC PLANT SPECIES ORNAMENTAL TREE LARGE DECIDUOUS SHRUB EXISTING TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB DECIDUOUS SHRUB EVERGREEN TREE PERENNIALS GROUNDCOVER SHADE TREE REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE REPLACEMENT PROTECTED TREE I � ' r ' Z Lu PROPOSED FUEL i STATION ------------ - - - - -- � / FUEL STATION LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 1 = 20' N ( 91 Ld NORTH 0 10 20 40 60 REVISIONS Z Lu U 0 Z Lo 04 7 o 00 Lu m J= Z O Z ~ W cz K U W U < Lu J w J Q O `u °° 9 z � L J m 0 3 N 7 Lo E U • �� W pNj � C Q U CE D'a w� E o j Q U 0. C U c 0 0 z g CIL o 5 N I� C7 ^� z g H } co �—I Lo Ga o z� �T g In N O. DATE 9/27/10 PROJECT 10006 SHEET GENERAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS SET IN THE USA STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. 2. ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS SHALL ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. 3. PLANT LOCATIONS AND BEDS SHALL BE LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4. PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE A 3' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. MULCH HEDGES IN A CONTINUOUS BED. 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 ". 6. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE FERTILIZED WITH 10 -10 -10 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 7. SODDING BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. g. THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. 9. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE RESTORED, FINE GRADED AND SEEDED/ SODDED. 10. ALL EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS TO BE PRESERVED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: O LAWN AREA, PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACROSS ALL SURFACES. O LANDSCAPE AREA, PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE ACROSS ALL SURFACES. O3 MULCH BED AREA. ® LIMESTONE SLAB OUTCROPPINGS- 4 -6" THICK SLABS - COVER /DISGUISE EXISTING INLETS AND OUTLETS AND PLACE ON SHORE AS INDICATED NOTE: The amount of tree and shrub pruning shall be limited to the minimum necessary to remove dead or injured twigs & branches. Retain normal shape. Plant trees, shrubs and evergreens at same grade as grown in nursery. Hose with 12 Gauge Wire Inside 2 "X2 "X7'Wood — Stake, 2 per Tree up to 7' Height DECIDUOUS TREE N.T.S. NOTE: Do Not Cut Main THE AMOUNT OF TREE AND SHRUB Leader PRUNING SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO REMOVE DEAD OR INJURED TWIGS & BRANCHES. RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE. PLANT TREES, SHRUBS, &EVERGREENS AT SAME GRADE AS GROWN IN NURSERY. Mulch Collar Remove Top 1/3 of Burlap and Twine CI 1rl11n rlI A AITIA Its r'%rrA II RPK / 23 HSD / / /8 JHY :D / / a NEW ENTRY DRIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 1 " = 20' PLANT KEY TYPICALS SEE PLANT LIST FOR SPECIFIC PLANT SPECIES PARKING BLOCK HARDWOOD BARK MULCH COLLAR PLANTING MIXTURE - REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF CART STORAGE LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT BURLAP AND TWINE SCALE: I 10' (TYPICAL OF 3) SCARIFY 4' DEEP AND RECOMPACT / / / / / ORNAMENTAL TREE LARGE DECIDUOUS SHRUB EXISTING TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB DECIDUOUS SHRUB EVERGREEN TREE PERENNIALS GROUNDCOVER SHADE TREE REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE REPLACEMENT PROTECTED TREE REVISIONS Z J CL LU CL U 0 Z Q LO 04 7 O O 00 W N Z Z 0 LU Cz o m o w U w LU J w Q O w 9 z LL. J m 0 L0 N w 7 Lo p j U • ^� � U v =O c •rn U n EL j o Q U O U •� c o g a 0 s G� H I� Z L LO n IL �T Z J co N Cl DATE 9/27/10 PROJECT 10006 SHEET L�2 � I I I � I 1 I � y I 11 Il 1 1 I� I � I I 11 I 1 1 11 I L I I I 1 1 I II i 1 I / IIII I I I� I L - El I 1 I I I El h 1 Elm ) 11 -I H � a� C HC I HC HC I 3 i �r I I I I I I I I I I I I I �� 1 I I I I I I 1 ra I ra 1 1 �i1 L L Y1L_I�L_ LL_ L_I_ L_ L L_ L L_ J ------------ - - - - -- 92 ----- - - - - -- 89 ---- - - - -1- 86 93 87 �94 911 �88 IN 95 96 1 V7 1 1 1 �y I 971 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` \ I I I V �f 9 �I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I p'I I I I I I I I /\I I I I I I I /I. � P� ) P7) 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 0 � � o ( 101 1 1 �� lQ4 lod r� I r 1 1 102 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — ra ra � 1 bra ba�rg �� X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 I I I I 1 111 � I � �- W ro 7� 77— i 10� I 1 I I N 11 78 • I— — +— + + — + —F- +- 4-- +— + —I — +— + 1- 4— F- - 1- 4- -1 - -4 —+ H— + - -F- -1 - -- I 105 106 1 E / I I I 1 1 12 1 9 t� I \ ld9 � I 110 I I I I I I I I I I I � I �I I I I I 10 �I ,1 IIIIIIIIIII I IIII II IIIIII IIIIII 1,� 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II III I I I I I l J N I I 1 I I �I 7 y 11 11 I I I I I I I I I I Iv I I I Il9 I 1 1 EI 4 2� I i 1 I l i I Il I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 113 4 13 3 112 114 116 5 14� 117 6 15� 16 Iv( i I I I I I a I� /I 1 1 III I I I \I I I I I I II I III I 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 121 1 122 1 123 7 8� r u '/ - - ' -- - - -- - -� -- - - - -- - - -u9t - -- Ex. 6 haln Llnk Fence ---- J-------------------------- - - - - -� / T GENERAL NOTE 1. DIAMETER SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET L -2 REPRESENT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (1' RADIUS PER 1" CALIPER OR 15 WHICHEVER IS GREATER). TREES REMOVED 56 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE WHICH ARE REMOVED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO TREE NOT BEING POOR OR DEAD I L -------------------------- - - - - -- EXISTING PLANT LIST KEY CONDITION: EXCELLENT A. PRESERVE GOOD B. REMOVE FAIR POOR DEAD PLANT KEY ;EE FENCE* LISTING TREE JSTING TREE TO BE REMOVED :PLACEMENT TREE: :EVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW )CATION TREE :PLACEMENT PROTECTED TREE �C FENCING SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES ONLY. FENCING IS TO BE PLACED ADJACENT TO BACK OF CURB IN ANY LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH PRESERVED TREES LOCATED WITHIN IT. I� 11 ,� 11 • I F 18 rr v 1 . t RAW h r7— T —I --r —� —T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0 y \ T 56 / I a i 5 o, / A i ' 47 \ r 6 45 / - - > 44 , I 9 �l i I 1 t l I I 1 I I I Sq I I � I I I I I I I I 36 35 i 34 1 1 I / 33 / 1 32 F y % I _ I /II I I I TREE PRESERVATION PLAN - - - - - -- - 111 NORTH 1 " =40' 0 20 40 80 120 1 n 11 I 1 j I SCALE: V = 40' NO. SIZE SPECIES CONDITION STATUS REQUIRED REPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT FROM PREVIOUS APPROVED PLAN 105 T' CAL LOCUST GOOD A 106 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 2 CAL 107 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 108 4" AL MAPLE GOOD A 109 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 110 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD A LU 111 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 112 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A Lo 04 113 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 114 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 2 CAL 115 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 2 CAL 116 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A O w 2 " CAL 117 4" CAL HAWTHORN GOOD A 2 CAL 118 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD 2 " CAL 119 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 2 " CAL 120 10" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 8 " TOTAL CAL. D� 121 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD Q U O c U c 0 122 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B 6 TOTA1 123 10" CAL LOCUST GOOD 2 " CAL 124 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 2 " CAL 125 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B �T 2 CAL 126 6" CAL I LOCUST GOOD B PROJECT I I 1 I I I I I I I f ^ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L�_LL_L_LL_LL LL_LL_L_LL_LL_L_LL_LL 8 67 - 124 _ /- - - - - -- -� / -84 69 125 -85 126 -- - - \S -- - _ 61 60 / -- T r -i T -i -T- a59 I I I I I I I 58 1\ I Ex. Water 57 m Feature h' — � R Uge 65 ' `\ ¢6 - - it - I E I I I I tl - 1 I I I 1 1 EXISTING TREE LIST NO. SIZE SPECIES CONDITION STATUS REQUIRED REPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT FROM PREVIOUS APPROVED PLAN 1 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 2 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD B 2 CAL 3 1 8" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 4 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 5 6" CAL. LOCUST W A 6 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A LU 7 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 8 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A Lo 04 9 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD O 2 10 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 2 CAL 11 4" CAL LOCUST W cz B 2 CAL 12 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD B O w 2 " CAL 13 4" CAL HAWTHORN GOOD B 2 CAL 14 4" CAL HAWTHORN GOOD 2 " CAL 15 2" CAL HAWTHORN GOOD B 2 " CAL 16 8" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 8 " TOTAL CAL. D� 17 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD Q U O c U c 0 18 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B 6 TOTA1 19 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD 2 " CAL 20 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD 2 " CAL 21 4" CAL HAWTHORNE G= B �T 2 CAL 22 4" CAL HAWTHORNE GOOD B PROJECT 23 4" CAL HAWTHORNE GOOD SHEET 2 " CAL 24 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 25 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 26 10" CAL. LOCUST GOOD A 27 8" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 28 6" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 29 2" CAL HAWTHORFE 7 =7 B AL 30 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE B 2 " CAL 31 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE B 2 " CAL 32 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD B 2 " CAL 33 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD B 2 " CAL 34 4" CAL. ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 35 6" CAL. ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 36 3" CAL OAK GOOD A 37 6" CAL ASH B 2 " CAL 38 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 39 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 40 3" CAL OAK GOOD 41 6" CAL ASH B 42 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 43 6" CAL. ASH POOR 44 3" CAL. OAK GOOD 45 6" CAL ASH POOR 46 6" CAL ASH POOR 47 3" CAL OAK GOOD B 48 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 49 6" CAL ASH POOR 2 " CAL 50 6" CAL. ASH POOR 2 " CAL 51 3" CAL. OAK GOOD B 52 6" CAL. ASH POOR B 2 "CAL 53 3" CAL OAK A 54 6" CAL ASH POOR B 9 „ CAI 55 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 56 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD B 2 " CAL 57 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE B 2 " CAL 58 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD A 59 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD A 60 2" CAL. HAWTHORNE GOOD A 61 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 62 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 6 " TOTAL CAL. 63 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 64 6" CAL LOCUST B 6 " TOTAL CAL. 65 6" CAL ASH POOR B 2 " CAL 66 6" CAL ASH P R 13 2 " CAL 67 2" CAL SERVICEBERRY GOOD B 2 " CAL 68 2" CAL GOOD B 2 " CAL 69 2" CAL. SLKVIULBERRY GOOD B 2 " CAL 70 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 71 2.5" CAL LOCUST GOOD 72 5" CAL LOCUST GOOD 2 " CAL 73 5" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 2 " CAL 74 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 6 " TOTAL CAL. 75 1 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD 76 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 6 " TOTAL CAL. 77 4" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B 6 " TOTAL CAL. 78 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B 6 " TOTAL CAL. 79 4" CAL LOCUST A 2 " CAL 80 4" CAL LOCUST A 81 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD B 82 4" CAL. LOCUST GOOD B 2 " CAL 83 2" CAL. SERVICEBERRY B 2 " CAL 84 2" CAL. SERVICEBERRY GOOD B 2 " CAL 85 2" CAL. SERVICEBERRY GOOD B 2 " CAL 86 3" CAL. MAPLE GOOD A 87 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 88 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 89 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 90 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 91 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 92 6" CAL LOCUST GOOD 93 T' CAL LOCUST GOOD A 94 3" CAL MAPLE GOOD A 95 5" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 96 1 6" CAL. LOCUST GOOD 97 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD 98 4" CAL LOCUST GOOD 99 5" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 100 5" CAL LOCUST GOOD A 101 4" CAL MAPLE GOOD 102 4" CAL MAPLE 103 4" CAL A 104 4" CAL MAVILL GOOD A REVISIONS Z O w Z Ly J W LU LU Lo 04 7 O 2 O W W m ~ J= Z J o W cz 0 ° w U w LU J J w a Q � O w Q w z LL. J CID 0 L0 N Lo E U . pl F o vi U D� Q E a E Q U O c U c 0 0 Z C L g o s N L—I Z g H ` �_ Lo t� a ° z'! �T M ZE ct4a DATE 9/27/10 PROJECT 10006 SHEET L�3 \ \ • • • • • 7 - � v - 7 - - r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ^• I I I I I I I I �J I I I I -- I I 65— I I 3 66— I I I I I I I I I I I I Ir • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p., �I I I I I • � I I I I I � I I I I I II i - -I -- - - - -�I - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •� I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I J 3 I I I ,,,,,,i i h�I I GPI I G� I � I I I I I i • I �'iiiiii � �� • I V�� I� r� � I� �J `� I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -L -L I',,,i,ii i� G%I I G� h V I I I I I I I I I I I I I• — —stm— — — —stm I I Aspnel 67 69 ti� I I i I I I � I I I I II •�1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � II • �- -! -J - -- - o I - - - - F ! I - - I � I I I I I I I I I I I I - T - I F - T - - T II I I I I I I I I I II II I I I I I I I a I I I I I I I I I I• I I I I I I� i I E _o TREE FENCE I 3 I I 4 I I A I 4' s NF q E I I I I d I I I I I I I �� I I I I I I I II • I I I I I I I I I I I I I % %; '44 - `` 43 I • • • '46 45 41 40 Ll �15 48 • K1-1 • ( F • Ex. Water Feature i I ', 60 TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT NOTES 1. COORDINATE ANY STREET TREE REMOVAL FOR ACCESS DRIVE WITH PAULA CHOPE, CITY FORESTER, AT ,- 614 - 410 -4701 V 2. ALL TREES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PRESERVED. ALL TREE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, AND PRESERVATION WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED WITH THE INPUT OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 3. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. THE FENCING MUST REMAIN IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGE IN THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE APPR VED BY THE LAND APE IN PE T R WNER • 0 � I 54 52 51 5 50 57 55 i r i r i 1 ? DD ❑b ❑CIII 1 i / l i El i l i i I i Ali � . Il I I I I � ❑00 24 �� ; ,; , � 24 a j 23 B 2 i- M q � I I • I mo- o i - -- li -- �i l I I 9 I I I I I I �'r; •/ I I I 22 r , I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I �I J 1. + l u � � � I � � � I I I I I I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II W 6 19 Oo ❑p 4I ❑o0 ; I a I ,'L , III i I E I I I• I I I I I I I I I I I I (� • id 75 I o> I I I I I O I O / I / - - -- - - - - - - r -- - - - - =7- =7= _ -_ - - - -- OO O J - N Ramp I • 1 •' 74 � � 72 �73 I I I I I I 7 1 I U -- - -� - -- - - -� -- - - - - - -- - -� - -- - - - - - -- - f1 - -- - --- - - - - -- Ihain Link Fence l E FENCE ( P) 18 � I U 20 1 -- -- -- � Rampll - - - - ugt u g[ - ugt e vge rrge urge �� I �I I II l i l I I - 1 ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- -- / O SC S C O. O SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF PROTECTION FENCING, REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION DETAIL.. 4. PRESERVED TREES REMAINING ARE TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED (IF NEEDED) TWO YEARS AFTER r � / `` r r r / r r o / / ry / I / I I I I I — — 1 --- I _ I I 1 1 I 56 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE WHICH ARE REMOVED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO TREE NOT BEING POOR OR DEAD r A/y i - r T r -- - � I CONSTRUCTION. 5. OWNER SHALL MONITOR HEALTH AND VIGOR OF - -T - -� EXISTING TREES THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST IF ANY DECLINE IN I HEALTHY TREES IS APPARENT. THE ARBORIST SHALL DETERMINE THE REMEDIAL ACTION IF \AN1G; TO B T� y TAKEN. Z 6. ALL EXISTING TREES NOTED AS FAIR TO POOR SHALL BE FERTILIZED YEARLY IN THE- §PRING US A HORTICULTURALLY APPROVED M (?D FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS. AFTER THREE Y 'ME HEALTH SHOULD BE EVALU�ED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND CONTINUING MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS Uz SHALL BE MADE. 7. ANY TREES REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN TREE r PRESERVATION AREAS WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED PER CODE. + I 8. FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THESE TERMS OF THE TREE - - -I PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, AND REPLACEMENT PLANS �_- SHALL BE UNLAWFUL w LU GENERAL NOTE +_ 1. DIAMETER SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET L -3 C REPRESENT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (1' RADIUS PER 1" I..L CALIPER OR 15' WHICHEVER IS GREATER). TREES REMOVED 56 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE WHICH ARE REMOVED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO TREE NOT BEING POOR OR DEAD r A/y i - r T r -- - � I TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 30' PLANT KEY TREE FENCE* EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE REPLACEMENT PROTECTED TREE REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE �C FENCING SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES ONLY. FENCING IS TO BE PLACED ADJACENT TO BACK OF CURB IN ANY LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH PRESERVED TREES LOCATED WITHIN IT. i V I I I I l i l l l I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I III II - V I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 �>> X13 REVISIONS - -T - -� I I TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1 " = 30' PLANT KEY TREE FENCE* EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE REPLACEMENT PROTECTED TREE REPLACEMENT TREE: PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED / NEW LOCATION TREE �C FENCING SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY IN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR GRAPHIC PURPOSES ONLY. FENCING IS TO BE PLACED ADJACENT TO BACK OF CURB IN ANY LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH PRESERVED TREES LOCATED WITHIN IT. i V I I I I l i l l l I I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I III II - V I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 �>> X13 REVISIONS Z LU LU Uz Q Q LU w LU � I..L Lo N O W W m I 0 Z Z o cy w 0 ° U w U w 06 J w J Q O w °° w z LL. J ao 0 L0 C4 � 7 Lo E n o � U � � c .2 I� ¢ w E o � m Q U o c U c 0 Z g 0 C o 7 h I� U Z } N a • e � ' g _N co L co Lo EL 0 Z g n a DATE 9/27/10 PROJECT 10006 SHEET L�4 r REPLACEMENT PLANT LIST (for removing ex. trees previously required and replacing ash trees in poor health in work areas) QTY KEY BOTANICAL NAME REPLACEMENT TREES 6 ULMUS X MORTON 7 ULMUS X MORTON 8 ULMUS X MORTON 9 ULMUS X MORTON COMMON NAME SIZE COMMON NAME SIZE ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 12 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 13 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 14 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 15 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 16 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 17 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 18 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 19 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 20 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 25 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. 26 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. 27 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. 38 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. 29 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 30 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 31 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 33 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 34 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 36 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 37 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 39 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. 40 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2 " CAL. 41 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2 " CAL. 42 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2 " CAL. 50 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 51 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 53 CARPINUS BETULA'FRANS FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE H RNBEAM 2 "CAL. 55 CARPINUS BETULA'FRANS FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM 2 "CAL. 56 CARPINUS BETULA'FRANS FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM 2 "CAL. 57 CARPINUS BETULA'FRANS FONTAINE' FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM 2 "CAL. 61 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 62 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2" CAL. 63 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 64 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM z 65 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 66 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2" CAL. 67 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 68 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 69 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 70 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 " CAL. 71 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 72 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 73 MALUS 'MADONNA' MADONNA CRAB 2 " CAL. 74 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 75 GINKGO BILOBA'PRINCETON SENTRY' PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 2" CAL. IUTAL I_ALirr_K INk_ritJ 98 CAL. INCHES PROTECTED TREE REPLACEMENT PLANT LIST (for removing ex. trees 6 " cal or greater) QTY KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT ZONE (CRZ) N EX Q U REPLACEMENT TREES 1 NOT USED DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT z 2 NOT USED U O 3 NOT USED STEEL FENCE STAKE AT 6' 4 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 5 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 10 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 11 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 21 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 22 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 23 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 24 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 32 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1/2" CAL. 35 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1 /2" CAL. 38 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1/2" CAL. 43 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 44 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 45 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 46 ULMUS X MORTON ACCOLADE ELM 2 1/2" CAL. 47 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 48 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 49 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1/2" CAL. 52 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1/2" CAL. 54 ROBINIA PSEUDOACACIA'PURPLE ROBE' PURPLE ROBE BLACK LOCUST 2 1/2" CAL. 58 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 59 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. 60 LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA TULIP TREE 2 1/2" CAL. T OTAL CALIPER INCHES 57.5 CAL. INCHES J ~ O F- O HIGH VISIBILITY MEDIUM 0 JX � CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) N EX Q U 1 FOOT FOR EVERY INCH OF U U LL , DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT z Z O (DBH) OVER 6 INCH U O CALIPER TREE - EXISTING TREE OR TREE MASS NOTES: . INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED CALL (614) 410- 4600 -THE CITY IS TO BE CONTACTED IF FENCE LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED OR PRIOR TO ANY ENCROACHEMNT OF PRESERVATION AREA TREE PRESERVATION 01 -1201 N.T.S. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT NOTES 1. COORDINATE ANY STREET TREE REMOVAL FOR AC \ DRIVE WITH PAULA CHOPE, CITY FORESTER, AT 614 - 410 -4701 2. ALL TREES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT V O SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE D� PRESERVED. ALL TREE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, AND PRESERVATION WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED WITH THE 0� INPUT OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 3. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. THE FENCING MUST REMAIN IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGE IN THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR. OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF PROTECTION FENCING, REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION DETAIL.. 4. PRESERVED TREES REMAINING ARE TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED (IF NEEDED) TWO YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. 5. OWNER SHALL MONITOR HEALTH AND VIGOR OF EXISTING TREES THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST IF ANY DECLINE IN HEALTHY TREES IS APPARENT. THE ARBORIST SHALL DETERMINE THE REMEDIAL ACTION, IF ANY, TO BE TAKEN. 6. ALL EXISTING TREES NOTED AS FAIR TO POOR HEALTH SHALL BE FERTILIZED YEARLY IN THE SPRING USING A HORTICULTURALLY APPROVED METHOD FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS. AFTER THREE YEARS, THE HEALTH SHOULD BE EVALUATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND CONTINUING MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE MADE. 7. ANY TREES REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN TREE PRESERVATION AREAS WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED PER CODE. 8. FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THESE TERMS OF THE TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, AND REPLACEMENT PLANS SHALL BE UNLAWFUL GENERAL NOTES 1. DIAMETER SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET L -3 REPRESENT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (1' RADIUS PER 1" CALIPER OR 15 WHICHEVER IS GREATER). TREES REMOVED 56 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE WHICH ARE REMOVED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO TREE NOT BEING POOR OR DEAD REVISIONS HIGH VISIBILITY MEDIUM 2 X 4 WOOD RAIL cRZOR is� RADIUS WEIGHT CONSTRUCTION (OPTIONAL) 51 WHICHEV EI BARRIER FENCING ATTACH SQUARE IS 4 X 4 WOOD POS GREATER TO POSTS WITH ZIP TIES AT 1' (OPTIONAL) O.C. EXISTING GRADE STEEL FENCE STAKE AT 6' O.C. STORAGE OF MATERIALS LU OR CONSTRUCTION U NOTES: . INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED CALL (614) 410- 4600 -THE CITY IS TO BE CONTACTED IF FENCE LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED OR PRIOR TO ANY ENCROACHEMNT OF PRESERVATION AREA TREE PRESERVATION 01 -1201 N.T.S. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT NOTES 1. COORDINATE ANY STREET TREE REMOVAL FOR AC \ DRIVE WITH PAULA CHOPE, CITY FORESTER, AT 614 - 410 -4701 2. ALL TREES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT V O SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE D� PRESERVED. ALL TREE REMOVAL, RELOCATION, AND PRESERVATION WORK SHALL BE SUPERVISED WITH THE 0� INPUT OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 3. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. THE FENCING MUST REMAIN IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGE IN THE PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR. OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF PROTECTION FENCING, REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION DETAIL.. 4. PRESERVED TREES REMAINING ARE TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED (IF NEEDED) TWO YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION. 5. OWNER SHALL MONITOR HEALTH AND VIGOR OF EXISTING TREES THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST IF ANY DECLINE IN HEALTHY TREES IS APPARENT. THE ARBORIST SHALL DETERMINE THE REMEDIAL ACTION, IF ANY, TO BE TAKEN. 6. ALL EXISTING TREES NOTED AS FAIR TO POOR HEALTH SHALL BE FERTILIZED YEARLY IN THE SPRING USING A HORTICULTURALLY APPROVED METHOD FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS. AFTER THREE YEARS, THE HEALTH SHOULD BE EVALUATED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AND CONTINUING MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE MADE. 7. ANY TREES REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN TREE PRESERVATION AREAS WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED PER CODE. 8. FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THESE TERMS OF THE TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, AND REPLACEMENT PLANS SHALL BE UNLAWFUL GENERAL NOTES 1. DIAMETER SHOWN ON PLAN SHEET L -3 REPRESENT THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (1' RADIUS PER 1" CALIPER OR 15 WHICHEVER IS GREATER). TREES REMOVED 56 CALIPER INCHES OF TREE WHICH ARE REMOVED TO BE REPLACED DUE TO TREE NOT BEING POOR OR DEAD REVISIONS Z LU LU U Q Q CL CL LU W LU LU L0 04 7 O O rV W N 7 Z Z w ��0 o W U < n LU J Q O `U 0 z LL. J ao 0 3 00 CNI F M U � C 00 �7 U s W o E m Q U C U c 0 0 z g o D h z a .� g hCD L CD LO IL °z z 04 Q DATE 9/27/10 PROJECT 10006 SHEET L�5 43' -0" SHIN( EIFS T O N N BRICK STO N L I %j %11 LIJ 0 RL LEFT (SOUTH) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = T -0" CL111ki `I CC - rn r%AAT(`LJ c ELEVATION W H Q FRONT (EAS SCALE: 3/16" = T -0" 92' -0" CD N RIGHT (NORTH) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = T -0" 34' -0" CL111kif`I CC - rn r%AAT(`LJ c 34' -0" CO I 0 N N 00 00 z 0 V) W ry Z O n ly- U V) W a N N O +% r N In O L L m , , 00 Y L L , r o W) NIn>c N C O x �OdILL. O Z REAR (WEST) ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = T -0" CO THIS DRAWING IS AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE KROGER CO. REPRODUCTION OR ALTERATION OF THIS DRAWING WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE KROGER CO. IS PROHIBITED. (NOT PUBLISHED: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED) NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: THIS SET OF DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS IS INTENDED AS A SET OF GUIDELINES FOR THE PROJECT AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SET OF CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. THEY MUST BE READ TO INCORPORATE ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES INCLUDING FEDERAL A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS. THIS SET ASSUMES THAT THERE ARE NO UNUSUAL SOIL CONDITIONS OR WIND LOADS. THE FAILURE OF THIS CONDITION MAY REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO THESE DOCUMENTS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND TO INFORM THE OWNERS /ARCHITECTS OF ANY QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATIONS WHICH ARE DESIRED. CONTRACTORS SHALL ALSO VISIT THE SITE BEFORE BIDDING. CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO KNOW ALL OBSERVABLE CONDITIONS AND APPLICABLE CODES. Project #: 010 - 00453 -00 Designed By: Drawn By: KSC Checked By: Date: 08/25/201 C Scale: AS NOTED Disk File: N817_CLR_ELEV.dwg Store No: N817 ress: N -817 DUBLIN, OH EXTERIOR ELEVATION AND SIGNAGE rowing No.: 817 3+2(4 15-0" ol lo - Kroger Deep Blue sw6244 White One Double Face Internally Illuminated Internal fabrication illustration (Column Width) 2' -3" (Access Width) 1'- 11/2" Service access via top cap removal Stone Veneer Channel Letters —�- 4" c Price u ' Changer 6" Sched 40 pipe Ledge 10" Cap , 4" 10" 3/4" MDO backerfor attaching stone veneer and channel letters 0 io x ti :Inf r " -0 "� Note: Top Caps shown darker for illustrative purposes only" . L I w . i r � "t l+ �� - IIII - IIII -IIII IIII IIII =IIII= IIII IIII IIII =IIII �6 "� Clearance between cabinet and stone pillar Foundation shown for illustration (required for removal of sliding sign face) Blue #2 purposes only. Refer to engineering specifications for wind load, etc. Scale: 3/4" = 1' -0" Job Address: This is an original drawing created Sales Consultant S IGN VISION CO. Drwg #: Kroger N817 Dub F1 Customer Name: by Sign Vision Co. and remains the Design: M. Charboneau Phone: prperty of Sign Vision Co. Do not I �rld Rev: 4-13 Rev: 6-1 -10 Rev: x 987 Claycraft Rd., Columbus, OH 43230 Rev: 5- Rev: 7 -5 -10 Rev: reproduce, copy, share or exhibit Approval ow: Rev: 5 -26 Rev: 7-8 -30 Rev: Contact person: Phone: without permission. Pdnfad Name and TO PH: 614-475 -5161 FAX: 614-864-0302 Rev: 5-27 Rev: Rev: Monument Sign S P E C I F I C A T I O N S: LETTERS: Face lit channel letter, 1" white trim cap, LED illumination, .125 acrylic faces w/ film RETURNS: 4 white LETTER FACE COLOR: Kroger Deep Blue sw6244 with white ELECTRONIC SCROLLING PRICER: Skyline PSS 14SPDFSSG (14" tall numerals) RETAINERS AND RETURNS: White FACES: Kroger Deep Blue sw6244 with white SUPPORT: up to 10" dia sched 40 pipe STONE: Internal CIVIL) block framework with chip -face stone veneer and single course red brick (to match color, type, size and pattern) 1 Total--- - - - - -- Scale 3/8" = 1' SINGLE FACE, NOW ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN 2'- 6" Stone Base 2'- 6" Stone Base Column Column 9.5" Cornice Top 30" Light Fixture A VE R c a 9.5" Cornice Top U E 3 E 3 O m E Q ro o 3 y o _- U VIL m PP � • � 4 ��_ s� —'i a 7 �F G. -_�: - 30" Concrete Fo te 5 ' Concrete Caisson Foundation siGncom Design • Fabdcalon • Erection • Service I I I I I 1 30" Concrete I i I i I i Foote I I I I I I ___________________________I I I I I I I I I I I I 4" OD x.226 steel I Center Post I I I I I 2' Diameter Concrete Caisson I I I I Foundation CLIENTAPPROVAL DATE 20" Stone Base 12" Aluminum abine I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I ALUMINUM CLAD CABINET, CONSTRUCTED OVER WELDED STEEL FRAMEWORK. LETTERS = 1.5" THICK, FORMED ALUMINUM LETTERS, MOUNTED FLUSH TO FACE SIDE OF CABINET. TOP CAP CORNICE IS FABRICATED TO FIT DOWN ONTO TOP OF CABINET. CABINET FRAMEWORK IS SECURED TO STEEL CENTERPOLE.- 4 "ODx.226. CENTER POLE IS SET IN CONCRETE CAISSON FOUNDATION- 24'' DIAMETER x 60'' DEEP CABINET RESTS ON MASONRY STONE BASE TO MATCH STONE COLORS /HUES USED ON BUILDINGS AT SITE LIGHT FIXTURE - "STERNBERG" PIER UNFF CAN BE ILLUMINATED OR NOT POLE SET INSIDE STONE COLUMN FOR ELECTRIC. MOUNTED FLUSH TO CORNICE TOP CAP. MASONRY BASE& SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTER BY OTHERS. TO COMPLIMENT COLORS & MATERIALS AT SITE. (VERIFY) CABINET - LIGHT SANDSTONE/ LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES(VERIFY) GRAPHICS - PALACE ARMS RED / MARTIN SENOUR LIGHT FIXTURE- VERDE GREEN PATINA TOP CAP CORNICES - LIGHT SANDSTONE / LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES PRODUCnoN PROJECT NAM AVERY SQUARE REVISIO 7 -29 -10 SALES BMS DATE 7 -23 -10 ARTReouIReD LOCATION 8 -24 -10 DESIG KID SCALE Noted May Vary Pr Documents CITY STATE 8 -27 -10 SIZE 14 PROJECT #10349 -A 1 Total--- - - - - -- Scale 3/8" = 1' DOUBLE FACE, NON- ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN 2'- 6" Stone Base 8' - 4" Aluminum Cabinet Column 9.5"Cornice Top T 28" + / -Light Fixture AVE Y �t T 9.5" ornice Top F DARE m > c O m E ro o � J O o 41 0 30" Concrete Fo te 5' Concrete Caisson Foundation siGncom Design • Fabncalon • Erection • Service CUENTAPPROVAL DATE m c U E 3 E D IN m c rn N 30" Concrete Footer 20" Stone Base 12" Aluminum 7 1:1 PRODUCTION PROJECT NAM AVERY SQUARE REVISIO 7 -29 -10 LOCATION 8-24-10 ART REQUIRED Colors on Printed Documents May Uary CITY STATE 8 -27 -10 ALUMINUM CLAD CABINET, CONSTRUCTED OVER WELDED STEEL FRAMEWORK. LETTERS = 1.5" THICK, FORMED ALUMINUM LETTERS, MOUNTED FLUSH TO BOTH SIDES OF CABINET. TOP CAP CORNICE IS FABRICATED TO FFF DOWN ONTO TOP OF CABINET. CABINET FRAMEWORK IS SECURED TO STEEL CENTERPOLE.- 4 "ODx.226. CENTER POLE IS SET IN CONCRETE CAISSON FOUNDATION- 24'' DIAMETER x 60'' DEEP CABINET RESTS ON MASONRY STONE BASE TO MATCH STONE COLORS /HUES USED ON BUILDINGS AT SITE LIGHT FIXTURE - "STERNBERG" PIER UNFF. CAN BE ILLUMINATED OR NOT POLE SET INSIDE STONE COLUMN FOR ELECTRIC. MOUNTED FLUSH TO CORNICE TOP CAP. MASONRY BASE& SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTER BY OTHERS. TO COMPLIMENT COLORS & MATERIALS AT SITE. (VERIFY) CABINET - LIGHT SANDSTONE/ LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES(VERIFY) GRAPHICS - PALACE ARMS RED / MARTIN SENOUR LIGHT FIXTURE- VERDE GREEN PATINA TOP CAP CORNICES - LIGHT SANDSTONE / LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES SALES RIMS DATE 7 -23 -10 DESIG KID SCALE Noted SIZE 14 PROJECT #10349 -B i ___________________________i ii 4" OD x.226 steel Center Post 2' Diameter Concrete Caisson Foundation CUENTAPPROVAL DATE m c U E 3 E D IN m c rn N 30" Concrete Footer 20" Stone Base 12" Aluminum 7 1:1 PRODUCTION PROJECT NAM AVERY SQUARE REVISIO 7 -29 -10 LOCATION 8-24-10 ART REQUIRED Colors on Printed Documents May Uary CITY STATE 8 -27 -10 ALUMINUM CLAD CABINET, CONSTRUCTED OVER WELDED STEEL FRAMEWORK. LETTERS = 1.5" THICK, FORMED ALUMINUM LETTERS, MOUNTED FLUSH TO BOTH SIDES OF CABINET. TOP CAP CORNICE IS FABRICATED TO FFF DOWN ONTO TOP OF CABINET. CABINET FRAMEWORK IS SECURED TO STEEL CENTERPOLE.- 4 "ODx.226. CENTER POLE IS SET IN CONCRETE CAISSON FOUNDATION- 24'' DIAMETER x 60'' DEEP CABINET RESTS ON MASONRY STONE BASE TO MATCH STONE COLORS /HUES USED ON BUILDINGS AT SITE LIGHT FIXTURE - "STERNBERG" PIER UNFF. CAN BE ILLUMINATED OR NOT POLE SET INSIDE STONE COLUMN FOR ELECTRIC. MOUNTED FLUSH TO CORNICE TOP CAP. MASONRY BASE& SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTER BY OTHERS. TO COMPLIMENT COLORS & MATERIALS AT SITE. (VERIFY) CABINET - LIGHT SANDSTONE/ LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES(VERIFY) GRAPHICS - PALACE ARMS RED / MARTIN SENOUR LIGHT FIXTURE- VERDE GREEN PATINA TOP CAP CORNICES - LIGHT SANDSTONE / LIMESTONE COLOR TO COMPLIMENT STONES SALES RIMS DATE 7 -23 -10 DESIG KID SCALE Noted SIZE 14 PROJECT #10349 -B CITY OF DUBLIN, Land 113e and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/ TDD: 614-410-4600 Fax: 614-410-4747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us Creating a Legacy PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and BI 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Proposal: A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and 131 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is intended to indicate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store a as conditional use, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. The site is located on the north side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a conditional use under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Charles Fraas and Eric Leibowitz, Casto. Planning Information: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us Motion #1: To recommend approval of this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application because it complies with the appropriate review criteria and the existing development standards within the area, with two conditions: 1) That the development text be modified to clarify the fuel station ownership by the grocery store as discussed by the Commission; 2) That the development text be modified to encourage articulation along blank facades along the rear. • Eric Leibowitz, the applicant agreed to the above conditions. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION SEPTEMBER 16, 2010 2. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- OO1Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: Approval of this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application is recommended to City Council. MOTION #2: To approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, the applicable review criteria and the existing development standards within the area. 1) That the lanterns proposed for the center identification signs not exceed a lighting level of 7.5 watts; 2) That deciduous trees be setback at least eight feet from the curb along the entry feature; 3) That a more diverse plant palette for replacement trees, particularly tulip trees, be selected, and; 4) That the applicant worlc with Planning to mirror the landscape treatment on Hospital Drive for the sign area along Perimeter Drive at an appropriate scale and size. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan application was approved. MOTION #3: To approve this Conditional Use application because it complies with the conditional use review criteria. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Conditional Use application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION A -' /& d a"), /k 0 --� Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2010 —Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 16 2. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Chris Amorose Groomes introduced this application for a new Planned Unit Development District on 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and B1 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. She said the proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as a conditional use, and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. She explained that this application consists of three components, the rezoning with the preliminary development plan, the final development plan, and the conditional use. She said the three motions are required and the rezoning /preliminary development plan will go to City Council for a final decision. Ms. Amorose Groomes swore in those intending to speak in regards to this case, including the applicant Eric Leibowitz, representing Casto; Andrew Gardner, representing Bird and Bull, Lindsey Taylor, representing Kroger; and City representatives. Claudia Husak said the applicant has made changes to the development text and clarified the fuel station operations by Kroger, the roof materials being permitted and used in the center, and the requirements for bollards and bike racks. She said the applicant has revised the preliminary development plan to only indicate an area for the outparcel without any design details as requested by the Commissions the last time this application was before them. She explained that a final development would be required to be approved by the Commission in the future should the applicant want to go ahead with the development of the outparcel. Ms. Husak said that Planning encouraged the applicant to show a slightly larger area for the potential outparcel to allow for more creativity in the future in the design and layout. Ms. Husak said changes have been made around the fuel station area with the elimination of a curb cut along the southern landscape island. She said parking to the north of the fuel station has been changed to make the circulation pattern clearer and the landscape islands have the appropriate dimensions indicated on the plans. She said the fuel station elevation changes include the option with the full masonry columns and the pumps are now beige to match the building. Ms. Husak said the applicant has also provided details for the under canopy lighting that Planning previously requested. She said most of the changes were made to the entry feature; the applicant has been working with Planning to create a high- quality entry feature with appropriate plant material, a paver treatment for the entry drive that also incorporates the proposed center identification sign. Ms Husak said that plant material was changed throughout the site per Commission concerns and suggestions. She said there are three signs proposed and some revisions have been made to the fuel station sigs. She said that Planning recommends approval of all three portions of the application and without any conditions. Ms. Husak mentioned that Mr. Hardt had voiced some concerns about lighting levels for the center identification signs, which may be best addressed with a condition. Eric Leibowitz, representing Casto, said the access on the southern drive was a significant issue for Kroger. He said the parking area north of the fuel center has been modified to improve the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2010 —Meeting Minutes Page 9of16 traffic flow and increased the green space around the entry feature. He said Kroger has eliminated 206 parking spaces from the existing parking field, the north parking field will retain 70 parking spaces and will be employee parking. Mr. Leibowitz said the outparcel will be completed to the standards of the Commission. He said the center identification signs were changed and the light level will be changed with whatever the Commission desires. He said the Hospital Drive sign is now incorporated into the entry feature. Mr. Leibowitz said there are 17 tenants in the shopping center and there are currently five center names being advertised. He said the tenants on the north end of the center on Perimeter Drive have a Perimeter Drive address but the tenants on the west have a Hospital Drive address. Andrew Gardner, representing Bird and Bull, said opening the entry enabled them to arch the flowers. He said pear trees were eliminated and crab apples trees will be used as requested, the junipers will be replaced with perennials. He said all the landscape islands are now ten feet wide. Lindsey Taylor, representing Kroger, said to remain competitive it is necessary to have fuel stations. She said the parking to the north of the fuel center is for the better for circulation. She said 206 parking spacing will be removed; Kroger will retain 70 parking spaces for employee parking. Mr. Walter read from the proposed development text and was concerned that the conditional use section appears to allow another retailer to move into the current Kroger location and the fuel station to be used as an independent fuel station. Ms. Kramb said the wording should be changed to "operated" rather than "owned ". Mr. Leibowitz said the retailer that purchases Kroger will also run the gas station. Mr. Walter said he is concerned Kroger will assign a gas station company to run the station. Jennifer Readler asked if all of the fuel stations are owned by Kroger. Ms. Taylor said there are affiliates which would still operate under the Kroger corporate name. She said the rights need to be preserved for the successors. Mr. Fishman said it has to be affiliated with the grocery store. Ms. Taylor asked if they are permitted to keep the successor language and the Commission agreed. Mr. Walter said with respect to the signs, he was concerned that any sign location along the Perimeter Drive entrance lacked the design and quality of the Hospital Drive sign location. He said he would like to see the incorporation of the monument sign on Perimeter Drive to be in concert with the landscaping. He said it will become the primary access to the center. He asked if the applicant plans to enhance the landscaping around the sign. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2010 —Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 16 Mr. Fishman said the applicant has done a commendable effort and is happy to see the results of the work. Mr. Hardt said he would like the bulbs in the sign lighting conditioned. Mr. Taylor said he likes the entry way and the ideas for landscaping. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she appreciates the change of plant material; however one concern is 40 inches of the 98 caliber of trees that must be replaced. She said there are a lot of Honey Locusts on this property and the trees have struggled, she suggests replacing some of the inches with another variety of tree such as a Tulip tree. She said there needs to be a condition stating that all tree plantings need to be a minimum of eight feet from the curb. She said there needs to be more diversity in plant material selection. Mr. Leibowitz said the goal is to incorporate the sign into the landscaping already present. Mr. Walter said to mirror the landscaping on the east of Hospital Drive on a smaller scale on the north side. He said it may mean refreshing the current material. Motion #1 and Vote — Rezoning Preliminary Development Plan Mr. Fishman made a motion to recommend approval of this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application because it complies with the appropriate review criteria and the existing development standards within the area, with two conditions: 1) That the development text be modified to clarify the fuel station ownership by the grocery store as discussed by the Commission; 2) That the development text be modified to encourage articulation along blank facades along the rear. Eric Leibowitz, the applicant agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr., Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) Motion #2 and Vote — Final Development Plan Mr. Fishman made the motion to approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, the applicable review criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Mrs. Kramb seconded the motion. 1) That the lanterns proposed for the center identification signs not exceed a lighting level of 7.5 watts; 2) That deciduous trees be setback at least eight feet from the curb along the entry feature; 3) That a more diverse plant palette for replacement trees, particularly tulip trees, be selected, and; 4) That the applicant work with Planning to mirror the landscape treatment on Hospital Drive for the sign area along Perimeter Drive at an appropriate scale and size. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 2010 —Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 16 The vote was as follows: Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Ms. Kramb, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) Motion #3 and Vote — Conditional Use Ms. Kramb the motion to approve this Conditional Use application because it complies with the conditional use review criteria. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Ms. Kramb, yes. (Approved 7 — 0) cbnn•i MD -6i H c 4 I6d]d] IF— yew 1 City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission CITY OF DUBLIN Planning Repo end u» rind en = .•n,•PiannIn, Thursday, September 16, 2010 $ sNe"'n, P..d Oobin. Oho <3J in, Case Number cbnn•i MD -6i H c 4 I6d]d] IF— yew 1 Riverside PCD, Subareas B and Bi - Avery Square Shopping Center wW sile:ww.tlublingM1.m Case Summary Agenda Item 2 Case Number 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Site Location 68.50 -7100 Hospital Drive 6315 -6595 Perimeter Drive Located on the south side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery- MulrAeld Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive Proposal A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and BI of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is for the establishment of an outparcel, a conditional use for the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store, an Increase In the amount of outdoor dining areas, and future driveway and access Improvements. Applicant Casto and Kroger. Representative Charles Fraas and Eric Leibowitz, Casto. Case Manager Claudia D. Husak, Planner II 1 (614) 410-4675 1 chusak @dublin.oh.us Requests Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Review and recommendation to City Council under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.05 for the rezoning with preliminary development plan Review and approval of a Anal development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. The final development plan will not be in effect until the rezoning with preliminary development plan is approved by City Council. Review and approval of a conditional use for a fuel station under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. A fuel station is classified as an auto-oriented commercial facility in the proposed development text, which requires the Commission to approve a conditional use. Planning Recommendation Approval of the rezoning with preliminary development plan, final development plan, and conditional use, without conditions. In Planning's opinion, this proposal complies with all applicable review criteria and the existing development standards within the area and approval of all applications is recommended. LP P/wP/N I Psi PC Z CVeas, Code10001 B mtl BI story Svoe Um ay. mptes1620101Pwe 2 of 22 City of Dublin m qummen�s -1 Fri ba Use ael mnsy..�so.pprola.m Long R Range Planning aam0e �' eeeeei 71 X eHo Nm iii a 250 500 City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission +Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 3 ot22 Update Overall Application August 16, 2010 The Commissioners expressed continued concern about the layout of the PZC Meeting outparcel and its potential effects on parking in the surrounding area. The Commission suggested that the applicant delineate an area for the outparcel and allow layout details to be reviewed with a final development plan in the future. The Commission acknowledged the revisions to the fuel station location and encouraged the applicant to eliminate a curb cut along the south entry drive to clarify circulation. The Commission also wanted to ensure that landscape islands are sized appropriately to ensure survivability of plant material. The Commission also provided input on the proposed entry feature and suggested that a more dramatic design was needed and, that if done appropriately, the shopping center identification signs may be permitted. The Commission tabled all three application components at the request of the a pplicant. July 8, 2010 Commissioners voiced their concerns regarding the combination of the PZC Meeting three applications, preferring to act separately on them over time. The Commissioners generally were in favor of the fuel station and outparcel, however, but expressed concerns about their location and layout. Commissioners also suggested changes to the interior north -south circulation drives for the shopping center. At the request of the applicant, the Commission tabled all three ' application c omponents. Revisions The applicant has prepared a memo as part of the revised materials L addressing the Commission concerns from the previous meetings and clarifying the proposed changes. A summary of the revisions follows. Rezoning /Preliminary Fuel station to be operated by grocery store Development Plan Slate or synthetic slate as roofing material Development Two lock -up positions required for bike racks Text Revisions Bollards must match building colors A ddress typ ographical errors Site Plan Area for outparcel indicated without design details as requested by Com mission. Final Development Modified parking configuration north of the fuel station and circulation Planning had noted that the relocated main entry drive provided an opportunity for the center to create a dynamic entry. Suggestions from the Commission included a boulevard and the removal of a significant number of parking spaces for the grocery store to permit for additional landscaping, water feature, and open space. Commissioners felt that the shopping center identification signs, currently permitted in the development text, should be stricken from the development text. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 4 ot22 around fuel station by eliminating curb cut to southern entry drive aisle Provided adequately sized landscape islands to support plant material Provided full masonry columns shown for fuel station elevation • Matched fuel pump colors to building material colors Revised fuel canopy lighting revised to flat lens design Revised elevations for three monument signs (two center identification signs and fuel station sign) • Provided more significant entry feature landscaping and design Addressed plant material selection Landscaped cart corrals with perennials and viburnum shrubs Facts Site Area 28.42 acres Zoning PCD, Planned Commerce District, Riverside, Subareas B and B1 Surrounding Zoning North: PCD, medical offices, daycare, bank and shopping center within and Uses the Riverside North plan South: PUD, Dublin Methodist Hospital within the Ohio Health Medical Campus plan East: PCD, Walgreens store within the Riverside plan, Subarea 32 West: PUD, Dublin Methodist Hospital within the Ohio Health Medical Campus plan Site Features Irregularly shaped; no topographic features. Developed as Avery Square shopping center (206,341 square feet) along the north and west boundary with the Kroger grocery store as the main tenant, two restaurant outparcels located along the east boundary. Parking for 1,205 vehicles. Main access from Hospital Drive in the eastern portion of the site; secondary access from Hospital Drive in the far southeast part of the site. Four additional access points along Perimeter Drive to the north (two for service vehicles and two for public access) and shared access with the hospital site along the south property line. Stormwater pond located adjacent the main Hospital Drive entrance. Service area and additional parking spaces located behind the buildings. Landscape hedge with intermittent masonry pillars along Avery - Muirfield Drive (required in the development text) and landscape beds on either side of the main entrance as part of the entry feature. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 5 ot22 Facts Overall Application Development Context 1 FCommunity The Future Land Use classification for this site is General Commercial. The development text permits uses consistent with the Future Land Use designation. The density approved with the original Planned District is 10,000 square feet per acre, greater than the Community Plan recommended range of 6,500 - 8,700 square feet per acre. It is Planning's opinion the proposed density, plan and uses are generally consistent within the Community Plan as a land use comprising a majority of existing retail and commercial development. The Plan describes this type of development as automobile dependent and classifies the uses as auto - orie nted, which is consistent wit the ex isting and proposed develo Case Background 1989 City Council Riverside Hospital Planned Commerce District rezoning and preliminary development plan approved encompassing land between Post Road, Avery- Muirfield Drive and US 33, divided into Subareas A through C. Permitted uses include commercial, medical and office. Subarea B was originally zoned for a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment. 1996 Approved Preliminary Plat. 1997 September 15: Voted to reconsider sign decision and vacated previous action on retail center sign. September 3: Approved retail center sign. August 11: Approved rezoning to change setbacks, allowed for shared parking between the outparcels and reduced the parking for Wendy's /Tim Horton's to 63 spaces. June 23: Final Plat approved. 1998 Approved rezoning to address signs in the development text for Subarea B. 1999 Approved rezoning to modify development text to set parking number to 53 spaces for Burger King. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 6 of 22 Facts Overall Application Case Background 1988 &1989 Planning and Zoning Several reviews of the PCD rezoning of the Riverside plan; recommended Commission approval to City Council on January 19. 1995 September 7: Postponed review of Preliminary Plat and development plan due to the late hour. September 21: Tabled Preliminary Plat and development plan. November 2: Tabled Preliminary Plat and development plan. December 7: Tabled Preliminary Plat and development plan. 1996 March 14: Approved development plan for a 225,000- square -foot retail center. January 18: Approved Preliminary Plat, tabled development plan. 1997 Approved Final Plat 1998 August 20: Recommended approval to City Council of a rezoning to revise the development text sign package. July 9: Tabled rezoning for a development text revision. May 7: Tabled rezoning for a development text revision. 1999 Recommended approval of rezoning to City Council to change development text to require 53 parking spaces for Burger King outparcel. 2004 Approved amended final development plan and a conditional use for a 14,557- square -foot expansion of the shopping center and a 1,155- square- foot patio area. 2005 Approved amended final development plan for a 17;336- square -foot exp ansion to the Kroger grocery store. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 7 of 22 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Process Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation; the Zoning Code covers all requirements not addressed in the development text. This development text establishes a new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square PUD) with a development text that applies only to these 28.42 acres. The Walgreens parcel east of Hospital Drive is governed by Subarea 32 of the Riverside PCD development text but is not part of this application. The existing Riverside PCD text must remain unchanged in order to continue to provide development requirements for Walgreens. Accordingly, this application requests the rezoning of the existing Subareas B and 31 and the creation of a new Avery Square Planned Unit Development District. Plan Overview The rezoning with preliminary development plan includes: Rezoning the site from PCD to PUD. Establishing a new development text with development requirements for the 28.42 acre site, including a fuel station as a conditional use, describing access changes due to planned intersection improvements along Avery- Muirfield Drive, and providing for outdoor seating areas. The preliminary development plan includes the preliminary layout of the fuel station. . Shows an area as the location for a future outparcel Development The proposed development text eliminates all references to land and Text subareas not included in the rezoned 28.42 acres. Permitted The development text refers to the Zoning Code's Permitted Uses in the Uses Community Commercial and Suburban Office and Institutional Districts. It also permits up to 3,000 square feet of outdoor dining areas across the retail center to be administratively approved by Planning. The text was revised to require matching patio amenities and off -site storage from November 1 until April 1. Outdoor display areas for live plant material are permitted as regulated by a recent Zoning Code amendment. Conditional The development text requires conditional use approval for drive -in facilities Uses developed in association with a permitted use, theaters, fuel stations and any outdoor dining areas that do not meet the Permitted Use requirements. The text has been revised to clearly state that the fuel station shall be operated by the arocery store and /or its affiliates. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 8 ot22 Details,: Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Density The proposed development text specifies a maximum building square footage of 10,000 square feet per acre. The 25.26 acre retail center site could yield a maximum building area of 250,000 square feet. The existing center contains 206,341 square feet. Parking Code requires 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or 1,135 parking spaces. The proposed text has been revised to require parking at 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The ratio of four spaces per 1,000 square feet is widely accepted as an adequate requirement for parking for shopping center developments. The preliminary development plan, which includes the fuel station kiosk indicates 875 spaces. Stacking Code requires five stacking spaces per pump for a fuel station and the proposed text requires three. The Kroger Company has provided a letter explaining why three spaces per pump is the company's standard requirement. As proposed, the layout of the fuel station allows additional cars to wait for a pump to free up along the boundaries of the fuel station (as noted above in observations of other sites). Planning supports this reduced number as five stacking spaces require a significant amount of extra pavement and observations have shown that customers are unlikely to wait in a single line for very long. Observations at the Kroger Marketplace fuel station have shown that once more than 1 -2 cars are lined up, vehicles usually wait outside a line to see which one moves first. The proposed text requires eight spaces per fast food drive -thru exchange window, which has been carried over from the existing text. Architecture The proposed development text contains detailed material requirements including warm -toned brick and stone veneer with limestone trim. The text has been updated to reflect slate or synthetic slate as the roofing material. Harmonized color selection is emphasized as are scale and building mass through articulated fenestration, patterns or structural expressions. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 9 of 22 Details R ezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Landscaping The proposed text requires a 3 -4 foot tall landscape mound along Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive with street trees planted at 50 feet on center. No changes are proposed to the landscaping requirements. Signs The proposed text has different sign requirements for the shopping center, fuel station and outparcels, with a provision for center identification signs. Exhibit A of the approved development text includes graphics and specific sign specifications, which were approved in 1998 as part of a text modification. As requested by the Commission the applicant has deleted language prohibiting electronic advertising and billboards. Center Identification Signs The Zoning Code allows two center identification signs for this site at a maximum height of 15 feet and a maximum size of 66.6 square feet. There was discussion at previous meetings to prohibit the shopping center from having center identification signs to eliminate visual clutter. The applicant wishes to retain the right to construct center identifications signs but revised the proposed text to restrict their height to a maximum of eight feet and 42 square feet. The final development plan includes revised designs for both signs. Tenant Signs The proposed development text permits two signs per tenant; a wall sign and a projecting sign. The text includes specific design requirement for these signs, including a specific color palette. In addition to the sign for the grocery store, four other locations are permitted wall signs at a height that exceeds Code. All of these signs exist and no changes are proposed. The provision for an awning sign has been eliminated. Fuel Station The development text requires a conditional use for a fuel station and the applicant has included a layout in the preliminary development plan for a fuel station to be located in the southeast portion of the shopping center parking lot. The details for the proposed fuel station will be further described in the final development plan portion of this application. Outparcel The preliminary development plan indicates an outparcel in the southeastern portion of the north parking lot. Planning has recommended that the applicant show a larger area that would allow an appropriate site design at final development. The text's density of 10,000 square feet per acre will permit additional building square footage. The Commission supported the outparcel but not the proposed layout or the elimination of parking spaces near the Wendy's /Tim Horton's restaurant. The Commission suggested eliminating the details for the outparcel, which the applicant has done. The outparcel's site design, architecture, signs and landscaping must be approved by the Commission as a final development plan. Planning will City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 10 of 22 Details R ezoning with Preliminary Development Plan work with the applicant on an appropriate site design. V Traffic Study The additional traffic generated by the proposed fuel center and outparcel can be accommodated on the existing roadway network. The City will be making long term improvements to the Avery - Muirfield Drive corridor, and will request the donation of the land for the necessary right -of -way. Analysis _ Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Process Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning /preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1. Consistency with Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the Zoning Code, except as Dublin Zoning Code appropriately altered in the proposed development text. 2. Conformance with Criterion met: The Community Plan identifies the land use for this site as adopted Plans General Commercial. The uses permitted for this site are consistent with the Future Land Use designation. 3. Advancement of Criterion met: This proposal conforms to the Community Plan and will general welfare and enhance the area by facilitating the expansion of a successful business orderly development within the city and by providing additional services that will serve a growing need in the community. 4. Effects on Criterion met: The proposal is appropriately located in the city and will adjacent uses safeguard the value of property within and adjacent to the area. 5. Adequacy of open Criterion met: This criterion is not applicable to this proposal. space for residential City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 11 of 22 Analysis Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan — J 6. Protection of Criterion met. There are no natural features or resources on this site. natural features and resources 7. Adequate Criterion met. The site will have access to adequate utilities and access to infrastructure this site is available from three points along public roads. 8. Traffic and Criterion met: The applicant has provided a traffic analysis, which accounts pedestrian safety for the square footage of existing building and proposed future development. The new entry will greatly increase safety and traffic efficiency both within the site and from Hospital Drive. 9. Coordination & Criterion met. The proposal maintains the existing development patterns of integration of the original development text. building & site relationships 10. Development Criterion met: The proposed plans appear to contribute to the orderly layout and intensity development of this site, including proposed uses, setbacks, and density. Planning will work with the applicant at the final development plan stage to define the site design. 11. Stormwater Criterion met. Adequate provision is made for stormwater management. management 12. Community Criterion met. The development text outlines all applicable development benefit requirements for this project. 13. Design and Criterion met: The proposal complies with the text requirements for high - appearance quality building materials. 14. Development Criterion met: Construction of fuel station and associated improvements will phasing occur first. Modification to the Hospital Drive entry will be made with the City's intersection improvements at Avery - Muirfield Drive. 15. Adequacy of Criterion met. There are adequate services for the proposed development. public services 16. Infrastructure Criterion met: No public infrastructure contributions are required with this contributions application. Right -of -way contribution will be sought with the intersection improvements. Recommendation Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval is recommended. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 12 of 22 �Detalls Final Development Plan Process The final development plan is the final step in the Planned District process and requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission of all development details including layout, architecture, signs, landscaping, lighting and other site improvements. Once approved an applicant may apply for building permits. In this case, the final development plan, if approved, will not be in effect until the rezoning /preliminary development plan has been approved by City Council. Plan Overview The final development plan for this application includes: i A fuel station with a 120 - square -foot service kiosk in the southeast portion of the site. Improvements to the shopping center main access on Hospital Drive. Locations and details for the fuel station and shopping center identification signs. Architecture for the fuel station. An entry feature for the shopping center. Revised landscaping. Density The density proposed for the site is 7,862 square feet per acre with a total building area of 206,457 square feet, not including the outdoor dining areas. Access The site's access points are on Hospital Drive and Perimeter Drive. The Hospital Drive access includes a small landscape bed on either side of the drive and a stormwater management pond. A secondary access from Hospital Drive is at the southeast corner of the site, which is the nearest to the proposed fuel station. An internal driveway from the hospital site is along the south boundary. Of the four access points along Perimeter Drive, two are primarily for service to the rear of the buildings. The City is programming future improvements in 2013 to the Avery- Muirfield Drive corridor that will improve access management and traffic flow on Hospital Drive and Perimeter Drive adjacent to Avery Square. As part of these improvements, the City is requiring that the site's main entrance along Hospital Drive be relocated. The relocated drive allows traffic to move farther into the site before requiring any turning movements, and will eliminate existing congestion and driver confusion in the area of the Wendy's /Tim Horton's restaurant. The applicant has been working with the City to accommodate this improvement with the preliminary and final development plans depicting the main access point shifted to the south and the permanent elimination of the existing access point. The final development plan includes an exhibit that shows improvements will be made by the City at the time of the intersection improvements. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Sign The proposed development text permits a monument sign for the fuel station not exceeding six feet in height, nine feet in width. The final development plan includes a sign made of stone that matches the building. A brick course is proposed toward the bottom of the sign to be consistent with the building architecture. The reveal on either side of the sign was increased to give the sign a more balanced appearance. The sign location along Hospital Drive north of the south driveway meets Code. Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Stacking Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 13 of 22 Details Final Development Plan Internal Circulation The proposed access improvements include changes to the northeast portion of the Kroger parking lot. A new north -south drive is proposed for Retail Center the Kroger parking lot to allow drivers a new route for grocery store Parking parking to reduce vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. This drive will also allow access to the fuel station through the shopping center and will be constructed concurrently. Fuel Station The fuel station, oriented parallel to Hospital Drive, will have five, dual - sided pumps, or ten vehicles with a 120 - square -foot kiosk in the center. Two pumps are north of the kiosk, two to the south, and the fifth east of the kiosk. The fuel station location is bordered on the north and south by two large landscape islands which should sufficiently clarify the expected traffic pattern. The fuel tank loading points will be incorporated into the south island. The plans were also revised to eliminate a curb cut in the southern land island as re quested by the Commission. Architecture The fuel station architecture includes a canopy with a 22 -foot roof height, resting on six, square brick columns with a 3 1 /2 foot stone accent course, as full masonry columns are typical for fuel stations within the city. The kiosk is brick with a stone course and an EIFS band along the top. Sign The proposed development text permits a monument sign for the fuel station not exceeding six feet in height, nine feet in width. The final development plan includes a sign made of stone that matches the building. A brick course is proposed toward the bottom of the sign to be consistent with the building architecture. The reveal on either side of the sign was increased to give the sign a more balanced appearance. The sign location along Hospital Drive north of the south driveway meets Code. The applicant has revised the colors of the fuel pump as requested by the Commission. Stacking The development text requires, and the final development plan shows three stacking spaces per fuel pump. Lighting The lighting plan was revised to indicate flat, flush mounted lenses for the fuel station canopy as required by the Zoning Code. Retail Center The development text requires 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of Parking gross floor area or 825 spaces. After the access improvement the site will have 1,015 parking spaces. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 14 of 22 Details Final Development Plan The existing access drive is lacking an entry feature and Planning and the Commission noted that with the redesign of the access drive the applicant is missing an opportunity to create a significant entrance. The revised plans show significant improvements in the area that create a high - quality entry feature. Decorative pavers are proposed for the entry drive, which will be flanked by curved landscape beds with columnar Hornbeams, shrub roses, ornamental grasses, boxwood an perennials on either side of the drive. Engineering has suggested that any pavers for the entry drive not be red to distinguish them from crosswalk areas. The curved landscape bed design continues to the north of decorative paver area in a concentric pattern and includes shrubs, perennials as well as shade and ornamental trees. The final location of the pavers and the curved landscape beds on either side may need to be adjusted slightly due to final design of the intersection improvements and the access drive. The south side of the access drive entry area also includes perennials, shrub roses and deciduous trees. Similar plant material is incorporated on the south side of the internal east -west connector. The applicant has provided additional landscaping around the fuel station to provide a cohesive development. The redesign of the entry drive, the parking lot and the inclusion of the fuel station affects fifty existing trees, six of which are considered protected. The applicant is replacing all fifty trees in addition to the 36 caliper inches of protected trees. The plans indicate landscape islands of varying sizes with a minimum inside dimension of ten feet as requested by the Commission. The plans propose Madonna Crabapple trees as suggested at the July meeting and includes similar plant material used at the entry feature. In addition, the plans were revised to eliminate the abundance of junipers as a ground cover. The cart corrals islands have a minimum inside dimension of six feet and include viburnum and daylilies as plant material. Signs The text permits two identification signs for the shopping center, along Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive. The final development plan locates each sign and provides a design detail meeting the development text. Both signs include an aluminum cabinet with routed letters resting atop a stone base. The signs are lower than previously proposed and the Hospital Drive sign is incorporated into the entry area landscaping. The Hospital Drive sign is a two- column design with light fixtures on top of each, while the Perimeter Drive sign features a single column. The applicant contends that both signs are vital to the continued success of the shopping center, particularly considering the changes to the two main access points to the center. Site Landscaping City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CD I Riverside PC D, Subareas Band B Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 15 of 22 Details Final Development Plan Stormwater The applicant's proposal reduces impervious surface from the site; no Management additional stormwater management is required. The City's erosion and sedimentation control requirements must be met. Utilities and Right -of- Existing water and sanitary sewer services are used for the expansion. The Way fuel center will be served by existing services and a new tap will be installed to connect to the sanitary sewer system for the drainage around the fuel pumps. The City will be making long term improvements to the Avery- Muirfield Drive corridor, funded through a TIF District. Donation of the land for the necessary right -of -way to construct the improvements will be requ ested. _ Site Amenities The proposal retains the bike rack for the Kroger store and adds two racks for the retail buildings. The development text requires new bike racks to have two lock -up positions. Analysis Final Development Plan Process Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a final development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1. Consistency with the Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the requirements of the approved preliminary proposed development text. development plan. [safety Traffic and pedestrian Criterion met: The plans include major modifications to the Hospital Drive's main access and Planning and Engineering have been working with the applicants to determine the best design solution. 3. Adequate public Criterion met: The site has adequate public services. No open space services and open dedication is required. space 4. Protection of natural Criterion met: The proposed plan meets the preliminary plan with features and resources regard to landscaping. Tree replacement requirements have been met. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 16 of 22 Analysis Final Development Plan 1 5. Adequacy of lighting Criterion met: Lighting proposed as part of this application is adequate and the proposed light levels and lens type meet Code. 6. Proposed signs are Criterion met: The proposed signs meet the development text and consistent with preliminary development plan. Signs located within an easement will approved preliminary require encroachment approval from Engineering. development plan 7. Appropriate Criterion met: The proposed plans meet the preliminary plan with landscaping to regard to landscaping. enhance, buffer, and soften the building and site 8. CompliantStormwater Criterion met: The site will comply with all applicable sformwater management management regulations and final calculations will be reviewed at the building permit stage. 9. All phases (if Criterion met: Not applicable. applicable) comply with the previous criteria. 10. Compliance with all Criterion met: The proposal complies with all other known applicable other laws and local, state, and federal laws and regulations. regulations. Recommendation Final Development Plan] Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the development text, the final development plan criteria and existing development in the area. Planning recommends approval of this request. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 17 of 22 Details IL Conditional Use (Fuel Station) Process The Zoning Code classifies a fuel station as an auto - oriented commercial facility which requires that the Commission approve a conditional use. Fuel Station The fuel station is appropriately located, and includes adequately sized landscape islands, circulation areas and stacking. Analysis Conditional Use (Fuel Station) Evaluation 1. Will be harmonious with the Zoning Code and /or Community Plan. 2. Complies with all applicable development standards. 3. Will be harmonious with the existing or intended character in the general vicinity. 4. Will not have a hazardous or negative impact on surrounding uses. S. Will provide adequate services and facilities. 6. Will not harm the economic welfare. Section 153.236 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval of a conditional use (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the Community Plan and the requirements of the Zoning Code. Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Code, except as may be modified by the development text. Criterion met: The proposed fuel station will not alter the commercial character of the area. Criterion met: The location of the proposed fuel station does not have a negative impact on surrounding uses. Criterion met: This proposal has adequate services and facilities available for the intensity of the desired use. Criterion met: This use contributes positively to the economic climate of the city and provides a needed service. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 18 of 22 Analysis Conditional Use (Fuel Station) 7. Will not create any Criterion met: The proposed fuel station will not be detrimental to the use or characteristic existing or future surrounding uses. that is detrimental to the surro uses. 8. Vehicular Criterion met: This proposal will not interfere with vehicular circulation. circulation will not create interference with existing circulation. 9. Will not be Criterion met: This proposal will not be detrimental to property values. detrimental to property values in the immediate vicinity. 10. Will not impede the Criterion met: This proposal will not interfere with surrounding improvements development or or developments. improvement of surrounding properties. Recommendation Conditional Use ('Fuel Station) Approval This proposal complies with the conditional use review criteria and approval is recommended. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and BI Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 19 of 22 REZONING /PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two - thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. In the case of a combined rezoning /preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning /preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and BI Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 20 of 22 convenient and non- conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The purpose of the Planned Unit Development process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process consists of up to three stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council reviewand comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The intent of the final development plan is to show conformance with and provide a detailed refinement of the total aspects of the approved preliminary development plan (rezoning). The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The Commission may approve as submitted, approve With modifications agreed to by the applicant, or disapprove and terminate the process. If the application is disapproved, the applicant may respond to Planning and Zoning Commission's concerns and resubmit the plan. This action will be considered a new application for review in all respects, including payment of the application fee. Appeal of any action taken by the Commission shall be to the Court of Common Pleas in the City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and BI Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 21 of 22 appropriate jurisdiction. Following approval by the Commission, the applicant may proceed with the building permit process. In the event that updated citywide standards are applicable, all subsequently approved final development plans shall comply with the updated standards if the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the updated standards would not cause undue hardship. Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(8) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in § 153.053(E) (4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10) The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. X e l7 I O] I I to] ►F-1 WIN q Review Criteria Section 153.236(C) sets out criteria for fhe review and approval of a conditional use. (C) Action by the Planning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing and shall not approve a conditional use unless if finds that such use of the proposed location meets all of the following requirements: 1) The proposed use will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives, or with any specific objective or purpose of the Zoning Code and /or Community Plan. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 10- 0017 /PDP /FDP /CU I Riverside PCD, Subareas B and BI Avery Square Shopping Center Thursday, September 16, 2010 1 Page 22 of 22 2) The proposed use will comply with all applicable development standards, except as specifically altered in the approved conditional use. 3) The proposed use will be harmonious with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. 4) The use will not be hazardous to or have a negative impact on existing or future surrounding uses. 5) The area and proposed use(s) will be adequately served by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewers, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. 6) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7) The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operations, including, but not limited to, hours of operation, that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odor or other characteristic not comparable to the uses permitted in the base zoning district. 8) Vehicular approaches to the property shall be so designed as not to create interference with traffic on surrounding public and /or private streets or roads. 9) The proposed use will not be detrimental to property values in the immediate vicinity. 10) The proposed use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Preliminary Development Plan PROPOSED SITE PLAN u, 10- OO1Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning/Pieliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan PROPOSED SITE PLAN 10 -00 I Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Deg, lopment Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan PROPOSED FUEL STATION ELEVATIONS SHINGLES TO MATCH STORE EIFSTO MATCH STORE BRICKCOLUMNS TO MATCH STORE SHINGLES TO MATCH EBS TO MATCH STORE BRICK TO MATCH STOR STONE TO MATCH STO. STONETOMATCH - STORE SKILL MT Q ENCLOSURE I' East Elevation West Elevation 10 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan PROPOSED FUEL STATION ELEVATIONS North Elevation 0. \ 9 WW '" SHINGLES TO MATCH STORE - EIFS TO MATCH STORE BRICK TO MATCH STORE STONE TO MATCH STORE SPILL KIT ENCLOSURE BRICKCOLUMNS TO MATCH STORE TRASH RECEPTACLE (TYP) South Elevation I 10- OOIZ /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FUCI Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan/ Conditional Use N I0 -001 Z /PUP /FD P/C U Rezoning /Prcliminaiy Development Plan/ 1 - mal Dev'lopment Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED STACKING DETAIL Final Development Plan PROPOSED FUEL STATION LANDSCAPE PLAN r N 10- 00IZ/PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan PROPOSED ENTRY LANDSCAPE PLAN t 16 Wl � wl I ,0'1pffM1XW e u �yyy s FA9MM ^ 1 I 7 L \ T1 IN➢ — � 8 1 ^ e ryW — rccowme Xnwlc /' (D. (D- 0 - I t � v Xso- Q u o J- 1 N Final Development Plan PROPOSED IDENTIFICATION SIGNS y _ AVERY SQUARE AVERY SO,UARF � f Syy 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FIICI Station 7100 Hospital Drive Final Development Plan PROPOSED FUEL STATION SIGN Internal fabrication illustration (Column Width) ? Price 1' -3" In Changer (As"us W idth) Schad P -11/2° 41 a0 pipe 3/e' MW Serelce accessvla leacler for top rap removal 10' MINN stone writer I and channel .'= 1111 = 1111= 1111I 1111 =_1111 = 1111 =1111 Foundation shown for illustration r purposes only. Refer to engineering alters Stone Veneer Channel T Letters y , -0 .. 1 ' - T Note: Top Caps shown darker for Illustrative purposes only 1-0" ~I ? Price -- In Changer Schad : r_ 41 a0 pipe Ledge 10" 10' Cap I .'= 1111 = 1111= 1111I 1111 =_1111 = 1111 =1111 Foundation shown for illustration r purposes only. Refer to engineering specifications for wind load, etc. I g" I 0 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09-16- 10) Avery Square Approved , 2010 This following text supersedes the original Riverside Dublin Development Text for former Subareas Band B, (Avery Square Shopping Center). The Riverside Dublin Development Text for Subarea B? (Walgreen's) shall remain in effect until such time it is amended. Retail Center 25.1 ac. The retail center is located south of Perimeter Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. The Dublin Methodist Hospital property is located to the south and west of the retail center. This area contains a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment typical in size to a small community center. Avery Muirfield Drive Outpareels 4 ac. Retail outparcels located along Avery Muirfield Drive, south of Perimeter Drive and north of Hospital Drive. Uses and architecture will be integrated into the retail center. Development Standards for Retail Center and Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels General If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Unit Development District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Unit Development District. 2. The revised access plan shown on the preliminary development plan is the general scheme to be constructed with the planned intersection improvements at Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive and Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive. It is not however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be preserved, its precise location may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. The final access design is dependent on the City of Dublin's Hospital Drive /Avery Muirfield Drive intersection improvements. 10 -001 Z /PDP /rnP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09- 16 -10) 3. Signage and Graphics: a. All signage and graphics shall conform to the Dublin Zoning Code except as provided by this text, and except as provided for in the Signage Criteria and approved as part of the Final Development Plan. b. The Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels ground supported signage shall reflect a uniform shape and shall be set in a frame of dark brown, black or bronze color. The center identification signs shall have the letters attached to an aluminum plaque. C. All uses within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall have signage of uniform size, shape and materials, sign bases shall be made of stone. These signs shall have a maximum height of G and contain no more than 50 SP of area per face. Landscaping shall be integrated into signage feauue. d. All uses within Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be allowed two ground signs, one sign oriented toward Avery Muirfield Drive and one sign oriented toward either a second public street (provided the site has at least 100 feet of frontage on two public streets) or the internal access road on the west side. e. No building mounted signs will be allowed along Avery Muirfield Drive frontage. I" The retail center shall be permitted two overall center identification signs, one located along Perimeter Drive and one located along Hospital Drive customer entrance. Sign bases shall reflect similar materials to the building architecture. All building mounted signage should conform to Dublin Signage Code except as provided herein and reflect a common shape, size, material and base color. g. No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence except as provided herein or as permitted as tenant's main identification sign under the "Signage and Graphics" section of the Retail Center herein. No wall murals shall be allowed. h. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. No roof signs shall be permitted. Nor should a sign extend higher than the building. j. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 2 10- 0012 /PDIWDPI u Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09-16 10) k. On site permanent directional sign, e.g. employee and visitor parking, deliveries, etc. will be of a common design, material and size must meet signage standards. Fuel pump identification signs (numbers only) at the fuel station shall be permitted. Lighting: a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cutoff type fixtures. b. All parking, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cutoff fixtures and shall be form the same type and style. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall be constructed of dark wood, or dark brown, black or bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 38'. e. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. Miscellaneous: a. All bike racks must have two lock -up positions. b. If used, bollards on the site must be painted to match the building colors. Retail Center Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Retail Center: a) Those uses listed in the Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial Districts of the Zoning Code. 10 -001 Z/PpP /rDP /CU Rezaiing /Preliminary Development Plan/ f=inal Development Plan/Conditional Use ICrogcr Duel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09- 16 -10) C) Outdoor Dining Areas with up to 3,000 total sq. ft. of seating space within the retail center area that can be allotted to the various tenants to be administratively approved by Land Use and Long Range Planning. Those outdoor dining areas shall employ matching amenities (fences, tables, chairs, (lower boxes) and must be of a black, wrought -iron design consistent with the patios which have been approved for the center. All patio materials (e.g., tables, chairs, etc.) must be removed from the patio area from November I to April 1. Such materials cannot be stored outside at the center. d) Outdoor Display Area for Live Plant Material as regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code. Conditional Uses The following uses shall be allowed within the Planned Development subject to additional review and approval as prescribed by the Dublin Zoning Code: a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Theaters. C) Fuel station which shall be operated by the grocery store at the shopping center, its successors or assigns, or an affiliate business of the grocery store at the shopping center. d) Outdoor Dining Areas that do not meet the requirements listed above. Yard and Setback Requirements: Along Perimeter Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 30', building setbacks 50'. Along the Hospital Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. 3. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setbacks 50'. 10 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FUCI Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission t09 -16 -101 Total building square footage permitted per acre shall not exceed 10,000 square feet. Utilities: All utility lines including water supply, sanitary sewer service, electricity, telephone and fuel, and their connections or feeder lines should be placed underground. 2. All utility connections should be kept to the rear or the side of the building, out of view or screened. 3. All mechanical equipment and related structures should be effectively screened from grade level view as well as on site views from within the development. 4. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened form public view with materials harmonious with the building. Circulation: 1. Opposing curb cuts on the Perimeter Drive and the Hospital Drive shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices. Parking: Iu addition to meeting the current City of Dublin code requirements, the following requirements should be followed in the design of parking facilities. 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Zoning Code unless otherwise noted herein. 2. Parking shall be provided at 4 spaces per every 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the buildings. 5 10 -001 Z /PD1> /EDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7 100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09 -16 -10) 3. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 4. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Dublin Zoning Code. Fuel station stacking shall accommodate a minimum of three spaces per pump. 6. Parking stalls shall be laid out in the most efficient manner; 90 degree layouts are suggested with 9' x 19' stall and 22'- 24' aisles. No parking shall be permitted on either the Perimeter Drive or Hospital Drive. Curb cuts shall be permitted as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. 9. Where slopes occur that exceed 3:1, the area shall be terraced or treated with erosion control materials, shrubs or ground cover. Materials which will roll, wash or float away are to be avoided on these slopes. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containcrized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Service: 1. All loading activity shall occur within a building. 2. No noises, smoke, odors, vibrations or other nuisances shall be permitted. 3. No area of the site will be used for outdoor storage. 4. Service courts and loading docks shall be screened from all streets by landscaping, mounding or walls. 5. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure, except as provided for in PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09 -16 -10) Section 6 of General Conditions herein, as approved as part of an outdoor live plant display area. Landscaping: Along Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive, a Y to 4' high landscape mound shall be provided with street trees planted 50' on center, within the right -of -way and planted 1' from the right-of-way line. The rear of all buildings or structures shall be screened with planting, hedge, fence, wall or earth mound to provide a minimum of 50% winter opacity and 70% summer opacity, between P above finish level and 6' in height. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2 1/2" caliper for shade trees, 6' to 8' height for evergreen and 1" to 1 1/2" caliper for ornamentals. General Conditions Anyportion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be seeded. 2. Street trees on each side of an entry drive shall be set back twenty (20) feet from the curb to accentuate the entry /exit points. A minimum greenbelt of ten (10) feet shall be maintained along each adjoining property line. 4. Shrub plantings are reconmmended masses or clustered in beds rather than singular shrub plantings. Site unity can be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade trees, evergreen trees and ornamental trees). New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. 6. No outdoor display area around the fuel facility sales kiosk or the fuel pumps shall be permitted. 10- 00tzrnDl> /FDP /cU Rezonin Development Plan/ Final Development Plan/Conditional Use ICro -cr Fuel Station 7 100 1 lospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09 -16 -10) In the event that the fuel station is closed for a period of 180 days and such closure is not a result of a force majeure event or as part of a renovation /redevelopment of the station, the kiosk, canopy, pumps, and underground tanks shall be removed from the site and the pavement and landscaping shall be restored in a manner consistent with the current parking field. Architecture Height: A. No outparcel structure shall be more than 38' in height. For structures with pitched roofs, this height limit will be measured to the roof peak. B. Height limit for the retail center will be 35'. Color Palette: A. Earth tones, muted and natural tones are preferred. Accent colors in brighter lines such as white are permitted for building accent features only. A mixed palette on a single building should be carefully selected so all colors harmonize with each other. Materials: A. Warm -tone brick. B. White brick can be used as accent. C. Slate or synthetic slate roofing material. D. Split -face concrete block or pre -cast concrete used as an accent with dark brick only. F. Stone veneer with limestone trim (limestone rubble in a coarse ashlar pattern). F. Stucco when accented with brick or stone. 1 o -oot zmDr /rDP /Cu Rezoning /Prelinvnay Developrnent Plat/ Final Dcvelopntent Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7 10o Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09- 16 -10) Roof: A. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are suggested with a slope equal to 8/12. B. Minimum 8" overhangs are suggested. C. Glass roofs are acceptable in portions of a structure. D. Mansard roofs are permitted. E. Flat roofs are permitted if architecturally coordinated and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Scale: A. The scale of the structures should be sympathetic to a residential character. B. Structures should be designed to harmonize with the landscape. C. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated building elements such as porticoes, dormers, recesses and other such elements which help break up the mass and bring it into a more residential character. Wall Articulation /Fenestration: A. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. B. Blank facades on the "rear" of the building will not be permitted, articulating such facades with recesses, fenestration, fences, pilasters, etc. is not encouraged. C. The amount of fenestration should be balanced with the amount of solid facade. D. With the exception of enclosed service corridors, the buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. 10- 0012 /PDl` /rat' /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel station 71001iospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09 -16 -10) Signage and Graphics All signs shall comply with the sign code unless varied by this text or accompanying drawings. A. Main Identification Signs: A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 8 feet in height on Hospital Drive, 8 feet in height on Perimeter Drive, and 18 feet in width, with a maxis nnn each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 42 square feet per sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail tenant Signage materials and colors. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. 3. There will be no project identification sign located adjacent to Avery Muirfield Drive. B. All signs shall meet the following elements: 1. All wall and projecting signage shall meet the City Sign Code relative to permitted sign face area and that wall signs not exceed 15 feet in height, except as noted. a. Wall sign 1'or the major tenant: will be a maximum of 22' 0" above finished walkway. b. The following maximrml tenant sign heights are permitted: 7044 -7052 Hospital Drive; 20 feet: 6545 -6459 Perimeter Drive: 20 feet; 6415 -6435 Perimeter Drive: 18 feet. Each tenant store front shall be limited to one wall sign, and one projecting sign. Wall sign faces shall not exceed one square foot in area of each one lineal foot in store frontage not to exceed 80 square feet, except in the case of the major tenant. (See Section 3 below). Projecting sign faces shall not exceed three square feet in area. 3. The major tenant shall be permitted signage of an individual nature within the center with a maximum area of 109 square feet. The letters shall be internally illuminated with "white" plastic faces. An individual tenant may select any one of the sign colors from the approved sign palette for a tenant wall sign. 10 10 -001 Z /PD P /FD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pine) Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09 -16 -10) 4. Each tenant space may have one (1) projecting sign of uniform size and design, as illustrated by the accompanying drawing. Background color of projecting sign shall match letter color of that particular tenant's wall sign. The signs will be externally illuminated, except for the major tenant, by gooseneck light fixtures. The gooseneck fixtures will be comprised of the same exterior finish and color, subject to staff approval. The color of wall signs and projecting signs shall be selected from following sign palette, or a compatible color approved by LULRP: a) Martin - Senour Market Square "tavern Dark Green W85 -0620. b) Martin - Senour Palace Arms Red W 1083. c) Martin - Senour Benjamin Powell House Green W85 -1089. d) Sherwin Williams Palais White SW -2429. e) Sherwin Williams Obsidian (Dark Blue) SW2738. f) Sherwin Williams Amethyst SW2703. g) Sherwin Williams Bonfire SW2321. The fuel station shall be entitled to one monument sign as approved with the Final Development Plan. The monument sign shall not exceed 6 feet in height and 9 feet in width. No signage or TV screens shall be permitted on the building, pumps or canopy, except as required by law. Avery Muirfield Drive Outpareels Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels: a) Those uses listed in Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zoning Code. b) Those uses listed in the Community Commercial District of the Zoning Code. Conditional Uses a) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. b) Outdoor Dining Areas. 1 0- 001z/PDP /FDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7 )00 1 10SUItaI Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission 109 -16 -101 General The orientation and the face of the out parcels will be to the west and at the corners toward the intersecting streets and to what would normally be considered the rear of those parcels, (i.e, the portion abutting Avery Muirfield Drive will be employed as an entrance feature to the residential areas to the north). Buildings will have a common architectural theme with good aesthetic quality, the same or compatible building materials and a common lighting, signage and landscaping ethic. Within this mold the west, and intersecting street faces may identify the separate users and their products with appropriate expressions of individuality. However the east face must appear as a unified, single expression. Structures, be they buildings or walls, roof lines and types, building spacing, signage lighting and landscaping should present an almost non - commercial approach with low level signage employed solely to identify users and structures and landscaping effectively shielding the street from the impact of activity on the site. The following additional standards are deemed appropriate to produce such a function. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the right to review all applications for their architectural consistency. Additional materials and colors may be approved by Commission if they are consistent with other building materials and add to the overall architectural quality. Yard and Setback Requirements: The setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be 45' for pavement and 65' for buildings. 2. Setback from Hospital Drive will be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings 3. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be at least 10 feet. 5. Pront yard parking setback from publicly dedicated local access streets shall be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. 7. The setback from Perimeter Drive shall be 30' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 12 10- 0017. /PUP /t DP /CU Rezmiing /Preliminary Development l lull/ Fillet Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09-16-10) Building setback from Avery Muirfield Drive shall be consistent for all building if possible. Height Requirements: Maximum height for structures within the Avery Muirfield Drive Outparcels shall be 28' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facility shall be regulated by Dublin Zoning Code. 2. The parking space requirement for the southern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Hospital Drive) shall be 62 spaces for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. The parking space requirement for northern outparcel (Avery Muirfield Drive and Perimeter Drive) shall be 53 for the existing building, unless it is redeveloped. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: 13 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pintd Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 1lospital Drive PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission (09- 16 -10) 1. In addition, landscaping within Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive shall include a 3' to 4' landscaped mound with street trees planted 50' on center within the right -of -way and planted 1' form the right -of -way line. 2. Minimum size of all trees shall be 2" to 21/2" caliper for shade trees, 6' to 8' height for evergreens and 1" to 11/2" caliper for ornamentals. Architecture: 1. Architectural standards shall be the same as defined for the retail center. 2. Architectural character shall be sensitive to adjacent development if applicable. 14 l o -00l Z /PD P/FD P/CU Rezoning /Preliminary Developmclu Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and 131 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z /PDP/FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Proposal- A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and 131 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as conditional use, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. The site is located on the north side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a conditional use under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Charles Fraas, Casto. Planning Information: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner 1I. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To table this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan/Conditional Use application at the request of the applicant. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan/Conditional Use application was tabled. STAFF CERTIFICATION _[ilk ail a AwtJ aG Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF D1113I -K AUGUST 19, 2010 Land Ule and Long Range Planning 5804 Shier -R'mgs Rood Dublin. Ohio 43016 -1236 FhonelTDO: 614. 410-4600 Fox: 614. 410 -4747 Web Silo. mw+.dubgn:ah.us Cresting a 44 gacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and 131 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z /PDP/FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Proposal- A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and 131 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as conditional use, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. The site is located on the north side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a conditional use under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Charles Fraas, Casto. Planning Information: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner 1I. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To table this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan/Conditional Use application at the request of the applicant. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan/Conditional Use application was tabled. STAFF CERTIFICATION _[ilk ail a AwtJ aG Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II Dublin Planning and Zoning Conunission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page I of 16 DRAFT 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 Avery Square Shopping Center 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Chris Amorose Groomes introduced this application for a new Planned Unit Development District on 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and B1 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. She said the proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as a conditional use, and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. She explained that this application consists of three components, the rezoning with the preliminary development plan, the final development plan, and the conditional use. She said that three motions are required and the rezoning /preliminary development plan will go to City Council for a final decision. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that the Commission is the final authority on the final development plan and conditional use. She swore in those intending to speak in regards to this case, including the applicant, Charles Fraas, Casto; Andrew Gardner, Bird and Bull; and City representatives. Claudia Husak presented this application and summarized the Commission comments made at the July 8 °i meeting. She said the Kroger store was the major tenant of the Avery Square Shopping Center. She said included in the meeting packet, was a revised proposed development text which includes all of the changes except for a couple the Commission had requested at that meeting. She said it also included a preliminary development plan site plan that shows how the access changes are being handled. She said there was the inclusion of a fuel station and an outparcel to the north. She said that the changes made to the development text were operational, as far as the fuel station is concerned being part of the grocery store. She explained that a condition to that affect has been added because in Planning's opinion, the location of that requirement within the development text is not ideal. She said there are requirements for cleanup and restoration of the site if the fuel station were no longer to operate there, a restriction on outside merchandise, and clarified language regarding the access being dependent on the City's final design. Ms. Husak said the applicant is continuing to include center identification signs, but at a lower height than what Code would permit. She said changes were made to the parking required, based on the gross floor area and also the patio amenities are required to be matching throughout the center, and there is a storage requirement. Ms. Husak said regarding the site plan, there were some minor changes made to the fuel station location and also to the outparcel location. She said areas italicized and in bold on the chart presented indicate some areas that have not been addressed to what the Commission had envisioned. Ms. Husak said regarding the final development plan, the fuel station was moved north slightly and it incorporates the area where the fuel truck delivery would be made within a landscaped island. She said the fuel station movement to the north allowed for a larger landscaped island with much more landscaping and separates the fuel truck delivery area somewhat from the main drive into the shopping center. 10 -001 Z/PDP /FD P /CtJ 12 e/onin8/Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 16 DRAFT Ms. Husak said the height and pitch of the roof has been modified for the fuel station elevation. She said the applicant decided to provide an alternative architectural elevation of the fuel station to be reviewed by the Commission. She said that Planning prefers Option 1. Ms. Husak said revised details for the shopping center identification signs have been submitted and the applicant has included landscaped cart corrals. Ms. Husak said regarding the entry feature design, the Convnission commented that it should be dramatic and really signalize that you have arrived somewhere. She said that Planning continues to be concerned that it is falling short of that desire. Ms. Husak said the fuel station is considered a conditional use in the proposed development text, and is the third application component requiring a vote. Ms. Husak presented the preliminary development plan proposed to the Commission in July. She said the largest changes are in the southern portion where the fuel station is located and in the area where the outparcel is proposed. Ms. Husak presented the revised proposed preliminary development plan showing the outparcel moved to the west slightly. She said it retains the north /south drive aisle and also retains some parking spaces in the vicinity of the Wendy's /Tim Horton's which are heavily used by construction vehicles; parking to go inside for food. She said the size of the outparcel has been decreased to allow for parking to be retained. She said that PIanning and Engineering have concerns about access proposed around the outparcel, and those are details that they could work out during the final development plan stage because it is not included as part of this final development plan. Ms. Husak said the applicant has looked at moving it farther to the west, and is prepared to talk to the Commission about the implications and why that is not fitting in well with the shopping center now. Ms. Husak said for the final development plan the outparcel is removed, as the applicants are not contemplating doing that immediately. She said however, it can be seen how the landscape island was increased to the south of the fuel station and eliminated an access point quite close to the intersection and allowed for the fuel tank delivery area to be incorporated within the landscape island, and then there is striping proposed where the truck would park to deliver the fuel. Ms. Husak said three landscape cart corral areas are proposed for the Kroger grocery store. Ms. Husak said in their discussions about looking at eliminating some of the parking south of the main access and moving the fuel station even farther north or including some of this area as part of the entry feature, it is the Kroger company's desire to require employees to use this parking, and there are parking numbers that they are considering to be their minimum standard, so that is one of the reasons that will be explained by them about why the move of the fuel station to the north was done slightly. Ms. Husak said the said the landscape island shown in yellow is the location of the proposed sign for the fuel station, She said a change was made where the brick band was previously located to the bottom which matches better with the architecture of the center and it also has a brick band on the 10 -001 z / r'Dr'n , Dl' /CU Rezoning /Preliminaiy Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 —Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 16 DRAFT bottom of the stone. Ms. Husak said Planning is still concern about the reveal being narrow on both sides and would prefer that it be increased by a foot on both sides. Ms. Husak said the main difference between the two fuel station options was the treatment of the columns. She said one was proposed to have masonry columns which is Planning's preferred option because it is really how fuel stations are handled architecturally in Dublin. She said the external merchandise has been removed from the revised elevations. She said Option B shows more of a column treatment with masonry only on the bottom of the columns. Ms. Husak said regarding the access modifications, an idea discussed at the July meeting was including an landscape boulevard in the center of the access drive which the City is going to build as part of the intersection improvements in this general area. She said design -wise, it is important that it is aligned with the north /south drive aisle. Ms. Husak said there may be room for a narrow, shorter median, but how much landscaping that could incorporate is not her expertise. She said if the Commission desires, it will be taken back to discuss with Dana McDaniel and Marsha Grigsby to include that in the design for the entry drive. Ms. Husak said landscaping -wise, there is a lot of plant material proposed along the southern side of the east /west connecting drive throughout the center. She said however, there is nothing proposed to the north of the entry drive and there are still large areas of grass that could incorporate landscaping. She said there are engineering constraints as far as where water flows to the site, and that was explained as a reason for the proposed pond size and not a pond on the other side. Ms. Husak said two center identification signs are proposed to be located on Perimeter Drive and Hospital Drive. She said the Hospital Drive sign is the more stepped sign. She said both signs are at a height of eight feet. She said Code permits signs at the height of fifteen feet, which has not been approved as part of a planned district in this area by the Commission. She said therefore, eight feet is more along the lines of what is seen in this area. Ms. Husak said there are three application components. She said this rezoning and preliminary development plan application would be forwarded to City Council for final approval, and there is a condition about the development text being clarified as far as the uSe of the operation of the fuel station is concerned by a grocery store. She said that Planning really wants that to be listed as part of the conditional uses, and not where it is currently located as part of the general development standards. Ms. Husak said for the final development plan, eight conditions are listed in the Planning Report, and many of them have to do with landscaping that was discussed at the July meeting as far as plant material was concerned. She explained that there seems to have been some miscommunication with the applicant and their landscape architect. She said she thought they were under the impression that the landscape material had been changed, but the plans did not show that, so there are conditions for those types of details. Ms. Husak said for the conditional use, the fuel station is in the development text and would require a separate approval by the Commission. 10 -00I Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kioger Fuel Station 7100 1lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 16 DRAFT Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak in regards to this case. [There were none.] Charles Fraas, Casio, the applicant, referred to a memorandum provided in the Commission packets where they tried to address every item raised by the Commission at the last meeting. He said they were fine with the condition regarding the fuel station operated by the grocery store. He said they understood the requirement of cleanup and restoration of the fuel station. Mr. Fraas said outdoor storage has been eliminated from the text and the elevations. He said the final access design is based upon what the City ends up doing. He said they have agreed with the City that the design is what they think is going to happen and they hope that any variation is minor from the final design. Mr. Fraas said the requirement of stone as a material for the outparcel signs is not a problem. He said they have reduced the center identifications signs and have shown two different sign options. He said one could be at the entrance to Hospital Drive and the other back on Perimeter Drive. He said they are back into compliance with what is typically found in this area of Dublin. Mr. Fraas said the change requiring parking per gross floor area versus net floor area was no problem. He said modification to the text reflect existing building conditions which is nice when you can do that too. He said they took Planning's language in what they were looking for with regard to the patios. He said they eliminated billboards and electronic signs. Mr. Fraas said regarding the site plan, they shifted the outparcel west which was a concern brought up at the last meeting. He said both their engineers and the City agree that the north/south drive really should stay right in that space. He said for them to add the outparcel and move it to the other side, it really becomes an impact on parking. He said that corner is where most of the parking issue is located. He said that is not where the surplus parking is located. He said when a whole outparcel is moved, it would really impact those existing tenant spaces. Mr. Fraas said that they tried to deal with the Commission's comments with regard to the construction and landscape trucks by providing parking there. He said this site plan was a concept only because staff had asked them to show what could be there instead of leaving it blank He said they understood that any future development of that outparcel would have to come back through final development plan and possibility a conditional use. He said they understood that those issues of access, design, and all that would be dealt with at a final development plan. He said the idea was to provide the surplus parking for any of those vehicles, especially the work vehicles that might use two spaces as they park. Mr. Fraas said that they modified the turning radius behind Wendy's where there apparently was a bubble, and they went ahead and agreed to do that at the time that the construction is done by City. Mr. Fraas said they have moved the fuel facility north. He said that there was a concern of trying to move it even farther north, but originally staff had a concern to make sure that as much of the traffic that was generated from the fuel station, go south. He said as they moved it farther north, it was accessing and using the main entranceway. He explained that the reason it was south was because of long discussions they had with staff as to trying to concentrate and put more traffic in on that southern access. He said by moving it north, he thought they had made a hotter t,rniert. 10 -00I Z/PUP /FD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Usc Kroger FOCI Station 7100 1lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of IG DRAFT Mr. Fraas said external merchandise units have been eliminated. He said they have increased the height and modified the pitch of the roof, and they hoped that addressed the issues of making the roof more visible from the ground elevation. Mr. Fraas said they have addressed the plan inconsistencies regarding the canopy columns. He said they did not care which of the two columns shown the Commission chooses. He pointed out that unlike across the street at the gas stations and Giant Eagle; they have columns in their center. He said they had no column preference. Mr. Fraas said that the hidden logos on the back of the signs on the columns have been deleted. Mr. Fraas said that they had no problem with the plant selection issue and that they would be happy to work with it. Mr. Fraas said Kroger is willing to do the cart corrals, but they have a problem with the trees in the cart corrals because it gets to be a health issue. He said they would be happy to have hedges and everything, but when something is overhanging it keeps the carts wet. Mr. Fraas said a big issue was that Kroger had certain parking requirements and minimum standards that need to be met. He said ideally a new Kroger shopping center would need five parking spaces per thousand, but they were willing to go below that in certain circumstances, especially where they have determined they can meet it. Mr. Fraas said here, they can, but they cannot eliminate those parking spaces that will be designated for employees. He asked that it be realized that the main access drive has been moved to the east, so the main parking lot for Kroger is getting smaller by the addition of the fuel station and to eliminate more parking. Mr. Fraas said another issue raised was putting a pond there, which was all engineering issue. He said that they were requested by staff or the Commission to add a water feature. He said it was difficult due because it was a high area. He said they had to (low water to the area and still get it back to the pond. He said he was not sure how adding a second pond would work because of the drainage. Mr. Fraas said with regard to the median issue, the City is responsible. He said if there is room, and the City tells them they want a median like this and it works engineering and safety -wise, they do not care. Mr. Fraas said with regard to the landscaping, they have an issue with the drainage and the way it swales down, but if there is a way to accent and put additional vegetation there, they can work with staff. He said they did not want all the plants to die. He said they would not be responsible for the final engineering, so they do not know what eventually will be approved there. He said if they were talking about the same scope of landscaping being discussed now, they could work with staff. Mr. Fraas referred to Rezoning/ /Preliminary Development Plan Condition 1 and said it was probably in the wrong section of the text and they had no problem with moving it. Regarding the Final i 0 -001 Z /t'D 1'/1 DP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Usc Itroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Co ninissiou August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 16 DRAFT Development Plan, lie said they agreed to Conditions I through 6. He said they were okay with Condition 8 regarding the concept of working with staff, as long as the scope stays the same, the same general idea of scope of what improvements they have done. Mr. Fraas said that they were willing to do Condition 7, without the trees for safety and health issues mentioned previously. Mr. Fraas said that Kroger was a corporate citizen that has been very good to work with, and Dublin is a community like other communities which benefits from retailers like Kroger. He said that Kroger has in the last two quarters given over $100,000 towards Dublin non -profit organizations and events. He added that schools and non -profit organizations have participated in the Kroger Community Rewards program, where in Central Ohio they have given over $5M funding. Mr. Fraas said by allowing a fuel station which is ultimately going to benefit the customer by saving money on their gas, be able to go to the store and allocate their rewards to help Kroger plans, they think is something that is going to be beneficial. He said it was hard to put into zoning, but they hoped it was part of the consideration. Mr. Fraas requested the Commission's support and approval of this application. Amy Kramb asked why were the outparcel details included on the preliminary development plan, but without discussion and then not on the final development plan as was originally done with the Giant Eagle plan, and then removed. Ms. Husak explained that Code required a preliminary development plan site plan that shows what in accordance with the text is proposed on the site, and the applicant is proposing an outparcel as part of this application preliminarily. She said it was a Commission driven decision for the other side of the street to eliminate the details for the fuel stations, but it is a requirement of Code to have a preliminary development plan that shows where uses are proposed to occur on the site. Ms. Kramb noted that the development text did not talk about it. Ms. Husak said it was because the development text has a certain square footage limitation, and they are currently under that. She said the applicant though knows where, if they want that square footage to be. Ms. Kramb said she had the same concern as she did with Giant Eagle. She said she did not like putting something on there that she personally might not be completely happy with, and then another Commission ten years from now thinks that this Commission approved that location and what it would look like, and they use the assumption that it was liked. She said she understood it was preliminary and a general idea, but she was more comfortable just leaving it blank. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that portion would be discussed later. Warren Fishman said regarding the cart corral issue, he would not object to not putting trees around them, but he would insist on having other islands close by with trees in them. He said there seemed like there was tons of parking and lie never had a problem parking when shopping there. He said the purpose of the trees was to break up the mass of asphalt. John Hardt asked if the cart corral islands are necessary to meet interior landscape requirements. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use I<togcr Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 16 DRAFT Ms. Husak said the interior landscape requirements are met currently. Kevin Walter requested a review of the revised proposed outparcel plan. He noted that the footprint of the building had been decreased to decrease the surrounding parking requirement and allowed a parking field to remain on the east. He also noted that there was extra landscaping on it that was on the west that had been reduced. Ms. Husak said the landscaping was probably the same size as far as the footprint of the building was concerned. Mr. Walter said it was probably a decrease of the openspace to require that. He noted that in the Planning Report it said that Engineering felt that the north /south drive aisle needed to remain and asked for further detail. He said lie understood for the need for it to remain north /south, but why it did not sit farther west as the Commission had discussed before. Kristin Yorko said it was more circuitous that way and they wanted to get people to get where they wanted to go instead of having to keep stopping and starting with interfering traffic. She said as shown, it was more straightforward. Mr. Walter said he understood that was a preference, but he wondered about the traffic flow. He said currently a lot of traffic comes in and heads towards the eastern outparcels and a lot comes into the center and heads to the west. He questioned how much traffic came in and went north. He said he was uncomfortable that a large enough parking field has been provided for the overflow parking for the outparcels on the east side. Mr. Hardt asked if the black line shown on the north /south drive separating Wendy's from the shopping center was a property line. He asked if Wendy's owned their site. Mr. Fraas explained that Tim Horton's is the ground lessee of that property. He said they own their own building, but Casto has ground leased that property to them. He believed that the two outparcels are one property, and both outparcel buildings sit on that one large property. He said he did not know if that was the actual property line. He said that there are three parcels for the shopping center, Kroger, the shopping center, and the outparcels as one tax parcel. Mr. Walter said he did not think this center needed signs and lie was not in favor of adding signs to the center. He said this center did not need that level of identification because he believed it was currently well identified as is. Mr. Walter said regarding the fuel station access, that he liked the way the island has been created, but lie was concerned about the first cut into the fuel station being a redundant cut. He said he was concerned vehicles will exit from that point and the other and no one will know who is going which way. He suggested it be closed and continued all the way through. Mr. Walter said the parking field to the north of the fuel station, even if it remains is a mess the way it is designed. He said he was concerned how they would get good traffic flow through that area. 10 -001 Z /PUP /FDP /CIJ Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan! Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Pnel Station 7100 1 lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Conunission August 19, 2010 - Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 16 D12AF r Mr. Hardt said he thought the movement of the fuel station to the north was good and Ile thought it was moved far enough. He said the increase in size of the landscape island was a good improvement; however, the two driveways next to each other cause him concern. He said closing them off altogether would be an option, but if the applicant feels the driveway is important, then closing and moving it to the east on the other side of the underground fuel tanks could be an option he would be willing to consider. Mr. Hardt said regarding the site circulation issues, he had always thought that the north /south driveway that went through the main parking field up in the north is fine where it is located. He said having cars come in, stop at a stop sign, turn left, and then immediately turn right to get to any of the stores on the north half of the center, he thought would be a circulation disaster. He said he liked it just where it is. Mr. Hardt said he realized that this was just one possible site layout and they were not discussing the details of the outparcel, but the one thing he did not like about the preliminary development plan was the way it was configured in tonight's submission where vehicles have to go through this small field of parking to get to the outparcel. He said it was a step down from where it was previously. Mr. Hardt said he wondered whether accommodating that overflow parking is really this applicant's problem. He said he did not know if there were cross - parking agreements in place, or how that worked because the information was not provided. He said typically, the City does not make one property owner redesign their site to accommodate an overflow parking problem on their neighbor's site. Mr. Walter said all the uses in the center are tied together and whether there is a property line drawn or not is immaterial to how it operates. He said maybe the answer was to reconfigure the entire way that works in that corner rather than trying to preserve the drive just west of Wendy's. He said if the Commission had all opportunity now to change the way that the center traffic flows, they need to do it because this is the only time in the next 30 years that they will have the opportunity to do that. Steve Langworthy pointed out that it was not highlighted in the Planning presentation that this roundabout also extends back so the drive becomes a right -in /right -out. He said that just as this center island affects this drive, this island will eventually affect this drive also. Mr. Hardt reiterated that the small field of parking and traveling through it to get to some outparcel of some description and some design to be determined later is problematic to him. Todd Zimmerman said he agreed with Mr. Hardt and Mr. Walter on the eliminating one access point for the fuel station. Mr. Zimmerman said Wendy's and Tim Horton's do an extremely good business and this is probably the reason. He said their overflow is primarily from construction vehicles and school buses. He agreed that the issue was whether their access went into the other lot. Mr. Zimmerman said he had no problem putting all outparcel where proposed, it was in the development text. hilt he asked if thev 10 -001 Z/P D I' /FD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission /August 19, 2010 Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 16 DRAFT had to go to the level of detail of how the parking would be laid out tonight. He said this could be a ten year program. Mr. Zimmerman said as long as he knew approximately where it is going to be located, proximity to the size of the building, the detail of the parking is not necessary because years from now Wendy's and Tim Morton's may not be there. He said he would rather, when the time comes, deal with the scenario on the parking. Mr. Hardt pointed out that the use of the outparcel was not known. Ms. Husak said originally, the proposal from the applicant had shaded out the entire area between the two north /south access points, and Planning requested more detail as to how it could be arranged or what could happen there. Mr. Hardt said he understood the request, but given the fact that what the Commission is seeing is fictional, he would feel more comfortable if the preliminary development plan that they actually approve as part of the record, just showed a shaded area. Ms. Kramb and Mr. Zimmerman agreed. Mr. Zimmerman said Ile believed that in the future, the entrance to the north on Perimeter Drive is going to be a bigger entrance in the future than it is now. He expected that in the future, they may want a sign there. Mr. Fishman said he agreed with Mr. Walter that no further identification signs are needed for this center. He reiterated that he would like to see islands with trees added at Kroger. He agreed that the bottom entrance should be closed because it was not needed and would cause more congestion. He said he agreed with Ms. Kramb that the outparcel should be left alone now to avoid confusion with any Commission. Richard Taylor noted it said asphalt shingles, and he thought they were all slate or composite. Mr. Fraas agreed to change that as they agreed previously to do. Mr. Taylor said last time, he talked about the entry he suggested they should have something more substantial and more dramatic. He said during that discussion many things about the entry were thrown out by the Commissioners including a pond, a median, and things like that. He said he did not think anyone said they needed to see a pond and a median — those were just thoughts. However, lie said the Commission would like to see another idea of the applicant's to make that entrance great. He apologized to Mr. Fraas for having spent effort having to explain those two issues, thinking that they were things that the Commission asked for and they were just suggestions on how to deal with that in a dramatic fashion. Mr. Taylor said he disagreed with Mr. Walter, and thought the proper size of signs was somewhere between what they had last time and the ones proposed this time. He said last time, the main entry sign was probably too big, but it was a gorgeous sign. He said the signs proposed tonight were weak and not interesting. He said if they are going to have signs, they should make a statement. He said last time, he commented that a significant sign can be done as long as it is worked into some landscaping and an entry feature. Mr. Taylor said there was still an opportunity to have a more dramatic sign that is part of an overall substantial main entry to this center which he would like to I o- 00IZ /I'DP /FDP /CU Rexoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ f=inal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 16 DRAFT see in addition just landscaping. He said if that was a pond, great and if it is a median, great, but there may be a better idea than that. Mr. Taylor asked to see the final development plan with the outparcel included. He said the existing parking seemed logical and straightforward and the ratio of parking spaces to drive aisles seemed to be tipped in favor of parking. He said when looking at new stuff he sees so many drive aisles and there is less parking with many paths and ways to get around it in both of the areas that are redone. He suggested that may be the thing that bothered all the Commissioners. He said it was a lot of paths and ways to move around that it was so different from what exists now. He recalled the discussion about removing the parking spaces where the angle is next to the drive and said he did not know the goal was to remove parking, but maybe to reconfigure that in conjunction with reconfiguring the entryway. He said he realized that they were trying to maintain a parking count for the employees, but that parking to the east of the relocated drive aisle on the south half of the site is all new parking from what is there now, so there are other ways that can be configured. He said there may be another way to reconfigure that in conjunction with looking at that entry drive in another way. Mr. Taylor said perhaps there is a way to clean that up and make that a little more straightforward and logical and at the same time achieve a more dramatic entry through there. Ms. Amoroso Groomes said she was in agreement with the outparcel going back to just the shading. She agreed that the exit to the west of the fuel station should be eliminated and that one at the drive aisle be used instead. She said regarding the cart corrals, since no islands in the parking surface are being removed, she thought it would be acceptable not to require trees in theirs. However, she said the Broadmoor Juniper proposed for groundcover is completely inappropriate for that kind of application. She suggested instead ajuniper like a Sea Green or something that would be upright or perhaps a single row of them versus the staggered row would be acceptable that would grow larger and provide some height. Ms. Amoroso Groomes said there are many honey locusts on this site and she thought it was completely appropriate to change some of the tree varieties, particularly along Hospital Drive, numbers 19 through 29 to another variety of tree to try to get some diversity on the property. She said the plant material diversity is really lacking here. She said she would like to see something like a tulip tree, a larger massing sort of tree and in the event something like the Emerald Ash Borer comes through not every Lice on the site will be lost. She said a couple of islands will be reconfigured and some of them are too narrow and will not support the plant life that is scheduled to go in them. She said immediately to the north of the fuel station, there is a long very narrow island that she would like to see increased in width by four to five feet in order to support the plant life projected to go there. Ms. Amorose Groomes said any new parking lot island that is going to go in has to be a minimum width of nine feet with an eight -foot plant bed. She said the skinny islands will not work. Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that in the pictures of the fuel station in the bottom portion, the fuel pumps are blue and she thought they should not be blue because a blue bottom of the pump is a sign. She wanted to see those reverted to a color to match whatever color the stucco or the material on those buildings, the trash cans, or a brick color. to- ootzrnoP /Fur /Co Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 -- Meeting Minutes Page I1 of 16 DRAFT Ms. Amorose Groomes echoed Mr. Taylor's comments regarding the entryway. She said the Commission probably gave more directive in form of a suggestion than they should have. She said they were really looking for something that just would be very aesthetically pleasing. She said if it was a pond, it was a pond, and if it was an architectural feature, it was an architectural feature. She asked that the applicant's fantastic architects use their imaginations to come up with something wonderful. Ms. Amorose Groomes said regarding the signs, she did not feel there should be a sign at Perimeter Drive because that entryway is already established. She said it might be however, be appropriate to incorporate something in the Hospital Drive entrance that might even add an architectural clement to that entry feature. She said she did not dislike the proposed sign with wings submitted, but she deferred to the architects to say what would be more in scale. She reiterated that some sort of sign was appropriate on Hospital Drive, but she was not in favor of something on Perimeter Drive because that entryway is not significantly changing and everyone has found their way there. Ms. Kramb said that she was in favor of the signs and she would rather put it in the text that they are going to have eight -foot signs than what the Code permits. She said the Perimeter Loop sign will be a more significance entrance because they will lose their entrances because of the roundabout. Ms. Kramb said her issue with the outpareel was solved if it was blanked out. Ms. Kramb referred to the text, page 7, General Conditions, number 6 where there was a word called fuel olign /sales kiosk used and confirmed that it was a typographical error. Ms. Kramb confirmed that the Commissioners understood that if they want the fuel station to be rum by Kroger, they could sublease it so someone else could run it. She said the text said if the fuel station is closed for longer than 180 days, is when they will take it all down. She said that implies that if Kroger goes out, they can sublease this parcel, BP can come in, run it, and keep it going. She did not think that got to the intent of what the Commission asked for last time. Ms. Husak said that was the condition in the preliminary development plan because Planning also did not like how it was stated that if a fuel station is constructed in front of the grocery store. She said the text read, That in the event a fuel station was constructed in front of the existing Kroger grocery store, it shall be operated by the grocery store and its subleases, successors or assigns or an affiliate of the grocery store. the development text be revised to clarify that a fuel station operated by the grocery store. She said Planning's condition was saying to delete all of that in the text and on page 4, where there is a list of conditional uses, under (C), it would not say fzrel station, but fuel station operated by the grocery store. Ms. Kramb said deleting number 3 solves the problem because that gets rid of the subleasing issue, but on page 7, General Conditions, number 7, That in the event the fuel station is closed for more than 180 days ,they will take it out. She asked if it was saying if the grocery store closes, the fuel station can continue operating. 10- 001Z /PDP /1'DP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /I', nal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and 'Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 16 DRAF'r Mr., Walter said that it was being said that if the grocery store chooses to close operations, but continue the fuel operations... He said there was a scenario where that could happen, so it should say if the grocery store ceases operation and /or the fuel station... Mr. Zimmerman recalled that Planning asked regarding the fuel station plan if the Commission preferred the canopy columns Option A or B. Ms. Kramb asked that the color of the bollards be specified. She noted they were shown in gray on the plan, but nowhere was it written down that they would stay gray and not be painted. She asked that the text say that they have to match the color of the columns. Mr. Fishman said lie disagreed with Ms. Amorose Groomes and Mr. Taylor about the water feature. He said it was kind of a theme in this part of Dublin with the exit ramp water features. He said he would not want a pond there with weeds growing around it. He said it needed to be integrated into a really dramatic feature. Mr. Walter said the applicant discussed where the parking field sits north of the fuel station and how it is configured that the drive aisle is moved, etc. He said the contention was that employees will be parking there. He asked to see the plan where the southernmost north/south aisle was relocated from the east. He asked where employees parked today. Mr. Fraas said employees are supposed to park in the back, but there is a very large field and it will not be as big so they can spread out. He said that Kroger has 2,500 stores and they have learned exactly how many parking spaces they need and they have a minimum standard. Mr. Walter said he did not see the employees parking there, and so he thought there was an opportunity to reconfigure that north area with more insight into how traffic should flow through there. He said it was very awkward and he encouraged the applicants to continue to look at that. Mr. Fraas said that was a hard line that the City has told them how it has to be done. He said the intent was just to have circulation and they did not want to have a lot of dead end traffic aisles. He said they have tried to maximize the number of parking spaces that allows circulation. Mr. Walter said lie did not think that they achieved that. He asked that they think about how drivers will leave the fuel station and work their way back through, because he thought that was the concern. He said they will head east and head out that way. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked that when this is discussed next time, that there be a site specific parking study, not just Kroger in general. She said she visits Kroger three times a week and she has never had to park more than five spaces back from this row. She said she wanted to see site specific, not theoretical grocery stores across America data, but something that would really apply here. Mr. Walter said he did not think the Commission had given the applicant clear direction at all on the signs. He said he changed his thinking about this. He asked what the purpose of a sign was. He said he did not think it was realistic that someone would be able to identify themselves as Avery 10- 00 1 zrn1)1) /rov✓cU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19,2010— Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 16 DRAFT Square if they are a small boutique shop, they will identify the store as being in the Kroger plaza. He said maybe the intention of the developer is to not have that tie exist and try to break the tie, but with staff's comments about the change with the roundabout, lie disagreed with Ms. Amorose Groomes. He said they need a sign on Perimeter Drive because it is going to become a more significant entry. He said new residents traveling along Perimeter Drive may not figure out that it is there. Mr. Walter said putting it into the entrance at the bottom would not make a difference because it is going to be grand as the Commission would like it to be and the sign will probably blend in and it will not be noticed. He said if they want to waste money putting in a sign there, go ahead. Mr. Walter said the Commission needed to think more about the northern entrance and maybe do more with it than they are today, so maybe he was going to change his opinion on that. He said they are not allowed to have signs because it was a PUD, and the Commission can determine what signs they have. He said there is a proposed text that says signs, but that can be changed or eliminated, made larger or made smaller. He said this was not a Code issue and they really needed to think about the purpose of signs. Mr. Taylor referred to the development text on page 9 at the top, Mansard roofs are not permitted. He asked if most of the existing building had Mansard roofs. Ms. Husak agreed to strike that from the text. Ms. Amorose Groomes reviewed the issues that had been resolved tonight. She said confirmed that they resolved the issues about the fuel station and its operation and cleanup, no merchandise through a condition, the look of' access point dependent upon the City, the center identification signs, and parking by gross floor area. She said the Commission decided at the last meeting that the patio amenities would meet a community standard set by the Commission that would carry throughout. Ms. Amorose Groomes said regarding the site plan and its access, they were okay with the outparcel shaded in rather than dealing with its circulation. She confirmed that although the movement to the north was minimal, it was acceptable to the Commission. Ms. Husak pointed out that the Commissioners agreed that the access point immediately to the east of the drive aisle, west of the fuel tanks, should be cut off, making that island wider. Ms. Amorose Groomes said there was no further discussion in regards to the access or the fuel station with the shutting down of the one entrance. She said however, they had a long way to go on the parking immediately to the north of the fuel station, but the access to the fuel station itself was okay. She said the delivery area was adequate. Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed with the Commissioners that that the height and pitch of the roof had been modified to an acceptable standard and that there was no need for an alternate elevation. Mr. Taylor said lie thought that was in reference to the architectural changes. Ms. Husak pointed out that the masonry option and the I IFS stucco column option needed to be discussed. 10 -00 1 Z/PDP/FDP/CU Rezonin @1P; L MU nary Development Plan /final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 14 of IG DRAFT Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed that Ms. Husak had noted the condition regarding the blue color on the bottom of the fuel pumps. Mr. Hardt referred to Option B and noted that the columns were sitting on the stone bases which he presumed were three feet or so. He asked for the diameter of the columns. Mr. Fraas said the architect thought they were about 24 inches in diameter. Mr. Hardt noted that they were substantially larger than the ones on the center. He said he did not necessarily subscribe to the notion that all of Dublin's fuel stations had to look the same and he thought there was the opportunity here to have one that was unique and special. He said there was not that could be done with a fuel station, but this proposal does a little something and he thought it would fit in well with the shopping center which has some unique attributes to it, including the columns. Mr. Hardt said he favored Option B. Mr. Taylor preferred Option A because the toothpicks on this fuel station were a little bigger than most, and Ile thought that was good, and that the color of the roof and brick go together much better as an overall composition than the lighter color below. Mr. Fishman said he had looked at other fuel stations in Dublin, and the stucco ones get damaged and are not as well maintained as the brick ones. He preferred the brick ones, because as it ages, it looks better than stucco which gets chipped. Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Walter, and Ms. Kramb preferred Option A. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the shopping center signs had been discussed and direction regarding cart corrals was that it was okay that they did not have trees in them as long as they were not removing existing islands. She reiterated that she would like to see an upright Juniper rather than a ground cover Juniper. Mr. Taylor said regarding the shopping center signs, Ile would accept one sign as opposed to two signs and lie could accept the sign at the north as opposed to the south. He reiterated that the big sign proposed last month was well designed overall, but these signs were a stone wall with a sign shuck to it. He said his bigger concern was that whatever size or how it is incorporated into the landscape, he would like to see a really sharp sign and special. Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed that the Commissioners had all agreed that it was appropriate for a fuel station to be there. Andrew Gardner, the project engineer, provided an idea to close the southern entry into the fuel station. He explained that one of their primary concerns was getting people in and out of the center, still trying to keep it separated and that is why they left the drive there. He said if the Commission supported moving the drive to the other side of the tanks, they could look at that. 10 -001 Z /PDP/FDPICu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page IS of 16 D12AF'r Mr. Gardner said there seemed to be a large consensus that they needed to remove that and an alternative, though not their preference was a right -in into the fuel center to the east of the tanks which would allow people to circulate into the center as they turn in. Ms. Kramb said she thought the right -in would solve a lot of the Commission's issues which were that they were thinking two people who want to exit will want to go different directions and there will be no sign to tell them who goes first. She said the right -in only would solve that problem with a `Do Not Enter' sign so people could not exit there. Mr. Langworthy said realistically, in a setting such as this, trying to design a right -in and make it stay a right -in is difficult due to the geometry. Mr. Walter suggested a solution might be to orient the station east/west as opposed to north /south. He said it might fix the exit headed towards the east. He said it did not work the way it was oriented. Ms. Husak explained that the original proposal Planning reviewed internally had it turned east /west and one of the issues with it was stacking. Ms. Amoroso Groomes said she did not see it being that problematic closing it off. She said the Commission's time should be spent on resolving the area to the north. Mr. Gardner said their concern was still if people cannot get easily in and out of the fuel center, they would have a problem. Mr. Walter said lie thought it was very clear that the Commission was telling them that they want to close off the drive and that they need to resolve the circulation issue with the parking in the north. He said it may be as simple as cutting that island a little and working a more natural circulation plan. He said it would make more sense to push the island against the eastern edge and allow a more natural flow to get you back out that way. Ms. Amoroso Groomes suggested that the Commission not design it tonight. She said she thought the Commission had given very good direction, and they would look for some creative ideas of how it can be resolved given the information. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked that the islands not be thinner, but wider. She suggested that by having one larger island in the center and eliminating the two islands they might gain a couple of parking spaces. She said site would not design it, but was saying that the drive aisle may or may not, if the quantity of parking spaces is the issue, then the trees can be made up elsewhere on the site by expanding the width of this and those trees can be transplanted. She said there is a host of solutions and the Commission is asking that they be creative and to think through and outside the box a little and not having to work with exactly every island where they have it today, and maybe pursue some creative problem- solving skills. Mr. Langworthy said that Planning can work with them to look at that area. 10- 0012 /PDP /RDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Dr:clopment Plan /Conditional Use Kroger 1=uel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 19, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 16 of 16 DRAFT Ms. Amorose Groomes asked Mr. Fraas what was their pleasure for the Commission to do with this application in light of what he had heard tonight. Mr. Fraas said they would love a vote, but he understood there were things that the Commissioners wanted to see. He said they would meet with staff and work through what they perceived to be some open issues. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the signs were the biggest outstanding issue. Mr. Fraas said he knew there were different opinions about the signs. He explained that graphics were important and if they decide that these signs would go in, as much as it is known as the Kroger center or the Giant Eagle center, which is not what everyone else desires. He said those are important identifiers and when dealing with small tenants that have limited signage due to Dublin's Code on their fapade, the complaint they get when they bring retailers Number One, is graphics. He said that is because it is visibility identification. He said this center is doing fairly well, but they work extremely hard and have to make concessions when they should not and they have to do things that they would rather not do. He said the idea of putting a sign there that names the name of the center and nothing else that is incorporated as part with landscaping and the materials that are part of the center, seems positive to him. Ms. Amoroso Groomes said if they came up with some really outstanding looking signs and incorporated them into the landscaping in an appropriate way, she believed that they might be able to drum up four votes. Mr. Fraas requested a tabling. Motion and Vote Mr. Taylor made the motion to table this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan /Conditional Use application at the request of the applicant. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Tabled 7 — Q) The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z/PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Proposal: A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and B1 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as conditional use, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. The site is located on the north side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital. Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a conditional use under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Charles Fraas, Casto. Planning Information: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To table this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan, and Conditional Use application at the request of the applicant. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use application was tabled. STAFF CERTIFICATION A /au'et ee . t�oax' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Claudia D. Husak, AICP RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN,. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Land Use and JULY 8, 2010 Long Range Manning Kroger Fuel Station 58DO Sher -Rings Road 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin, Ohio 430161236 Phone / [DD: 61"10 -4600 Fox: 61 44 10 Web Site: w..dublin.Oh.us Creating a Legacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10- 001Z/PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Proposal: A new Planned Unit Development District (Avery Square) for 28.42 acres currently located within Subareas B and B1 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. The proposal is intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as conditional use, increase the amount of outdoor dining areas in the shopping center and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. The site is located on the north side of Perimeter Drive, west of Avery Muirfield Drive and northwest of Hospital. Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a conditional use under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Charles Fraas, Casto. Planning Information: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To table this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan, and Conditional Use application at the request of the applicant. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan and Conditional Use application was tabled. STAFF CERTIFICATION A /au'et ee . t�oax' Claudia D. Husak, AICP lo- OOIZ /PDP /FDP /CU Planner II Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 20 of 37 agreed with Plann�g to bring the amenities up to afch what was seen elsewhere, that was fine as to tabs and chairs. He said he woul of like to see additional over ad lighting, but perhaps ow light on tables would be appropriate. He noted that the applicant has agreed to eli to completely the amplificatio t5f music. Mr. Taylor said the propos operational hours seemed to b consistent with everything thh�e Commission has appr ed recently in these areas. Taylor commented to Cit,Council directly that he w In favor of this patio being re cted to the current business exclusively and that it not go Ith the center. He said hew d like the City to somehowwake a part of this solution ermanent solution to the it ' g open area between the buildings, and not leave it in lim as it is now. Ms. Amorose Groomes th ed everyone for their comme She said it was always good en she felt there was a to unity. She said she had not d anyone contradict what so ne else had said. She sa' It seemed that there was gener consensus that it is appropriatetdfat there be a patio here. e said that she thought M alter's comments were wo�some weight of elimin g the western portion and m e doing something with the ern portion that would po I ly provide service doors thr the restaurant, and exploring- tY�ose kinds of options. Ms. Amorose Groomes said sh isited Mary Kelley's many. imes before she was on the Commission, and had a ys looked at the area next to,.it wondered why there �X not a patio there because would have liked to sit outside: She said this certainly is a compromise. Ms. Amo e Groomes said she would Ii to see this use tied with the current occupant or busi Mary Kelley's, to help prote e neighbors from things thateauld happen that may or not benefit them. She said s elieved it was important to help Dublin's corporate citizens and residential citizens in an ay possible. Ms. Amorose Groomes agreed that all amplifica issues should go along the standard that the Commission has done, particularly in sitive areas much like th f Montgomery Inn. She said she also was in favor of requirin gate to be installed to d that can be done to help the _ ,residents with the regulation of t. She said she was very ch in support of the presence.of a patio at this restaurant. ,Ms. Amorose Groomes conclu ed and said these were the thou s that the Commission wool like to pass forward to C' Council. She requested tha e audio tape of this case b ent forward to City Cou and not just the in beca she believed much gets lost en they communicate v1 mutes. [Verbatim transcript ' available.] Ms. Amorose Gr es thanked the resident nd audience for attending and eaking at this meeting. Groomes called a s�prfbreak before continuing the 3. Riverside PCD, Subareas B and B1 6850 — 7100 Hospital Drive Avery Square Shopping Center 6315 — 6595 Perimeter Drive 10 -001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Chris Amorose Groomes introduced this application regarding a new Planned Unit Development District for 28.42 acres currently located in Subareas B and B1 of the Riverside Planned Commerce District. She said the proposal was intended to facilitate the future development of an outparcel, the construction of a fuel station for the grocery store as a conditional use, and accommodate future intersection and access improvements. She said the annliaari -n rnmicrc ..f 10 -001 Z /PDP /IrD Y' /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 21 of 37 three components, the rezoning with the preliminary development plan, the final development plan, and the conditional use. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the Commission would need to make three motions, and the rezoning with the preliminary development plan will go to City Council for final decision. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the Commission is the final authority on the final development plan and conditional use, and speakers will need to be sworn in for that part of this application. She swore in those intending to address the Commission on this case including the applicant, Charles Fraas, Casto, Andrew Gardner, Bird and Bull Civil Engineering and City representatives. Claudia Husak presented this case and slides of the site consisting of several parcels that make up the Avery Square shopping center. She said the site includes the Kroger grocery store and the shopping center, and the Burger King outparcel, and the Wendy's and Tim Horton's outparcel. She said that the development text also currently includes the Walgreens site which is not part of this application, so the existing development text distributed in the will continue to exist, although it will only regulate development for Walgreens. Ms. Husak said the applicant is proposing a new development text, taking a lot of the existing language and cleaning it up and making sure that it specifically only applies to this area and including a fuel station as a conditional use. Ms. Husak said previously Dublin's traffic engineering staff presented to the Commission an overview of planned intersection improvements for the Avery- Muirfield Drive North Corridor, north of US 33. She said what is planned in the area are roundabouts at the intersection of Hospital Drive and at the intersection with Perimeter Drive. She said both affect the access management for the Avery Square site. She said the northern full access entry drive along Perimeter Drive would be restricted to a right - in/right -out. She pointed out that the splitter island of the roundabout goes past that entry point and restricts it. She said the other southern portion of the Hospital Drive roundabout has a similar affect with a splitter island that would restrict the existing access point to right - in/right -out. Ms. Husak said Planning and Engineering have been working with the applicant for a long time to figure out the best way to ensure that there is a full access point from Hospital Drive providing access to the shopping center and the restaurant outparcels. She said that was part of this application. Ms. Husak said another access drive is located farther south on Hospital Drive. She said traffic patterns within the shopping center are likely going to be impacted. Ms. Husak explained that the rezoning with the preliminary development plan portion of this application is the first formal step in the establishment of the Planned Unit Development District, and will require a recommendation from the Commission to City Council who will then approve or disapprove the ordinance providing the new development standards. She said development standards proposed are included in the packets. She said topics that have been addressed or changed are the fuel station, the parking requirements, and the signs. She said the preliminary development plan or site plan, serves to illustrate preliminarily the access, the fuel station and the outparcel that the applicant is contemplating for the site. Ms. Husak explained that the last step, the final development plan, requires approval by the Commission and would be followed by building permitting which includes all final site details, in this case limited to access improvements, the fuel station including the szion. nrchitecture. landscaping, lighting, and shopping center signs. 10- 0017. /PDPQ'oP /Ctj Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final De •,Iopmcnt Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 22 of 37 Ms. Husak said a fuel station is included in the proposed development text as a conditional use, which also requires review and approval by the Commission. She said as part of the application, the applicant is seeking approval of the conditional use as well. Ms. Husak pointed out the proposed locations on the preliminary development plan, the general access off Hospital Drive in the center of the site, the fuel station intended to be operated by the Kroger store in the southeastern portion of the site, and an outparcel that the property owner is contemplating in the area just west of Wendy's. She pointed out that the outparcel is not included as part of the final development plan because the applicant has not secured a tenant yet and many of the details are not known that would be required at the final development plan level. She explained that the applicant is prepared to come back to the Commission for a final development plan approval for the outparcel in the future. She clarified that the Commission is reviewing a proposed final development plan tonight that includes the fuel station, the access changes, one sign location for the fuel station and two for the shopping center. Ms. Husak said the current access arrangement is confusing with drivers exiting and entering the site, trying to get into the Wendy's /Tim Horton's site and using the north/south Perimeter Drive access point to get to Kroger or the shops in the western portion of the site. She said that the applicant has been working with Planning and Engineering to move that access point to the south, just outside the splitter island. She said the proposed access drive that has a much longer approach should help with stacking and the queuing of vehicles entering and exiting the site. Ms. Husak said it would result in changes in the parking area that is not currently heavily used, but the impact should be minor on the Kroger site. Ms. Husak explained that part of the fuel station proposal is a north/south access drive within the center of the parking lot that provides access to the Kroger parking lot for shoppers and also a more direct access to the fuel station if people are using the full service access point. Ms. Husak said that Planning and Engineering have proposed a condition in the final development plan that the applicant work on the turning radius, northeast of the pond where the drive dips to make it straighter because it is confusing and can get congested with the Wendy's /Tim Horton's access point. Ms. Husak said they and the applicant have been working on the entry feature. She pointed out where a grade change existed and where the applicant has shown some replacement trees within the proposed access area. She said it was Planning's opinion that an opportunity might be missed to create an entry feature that is more indicative of Dublin entry features to a center of this size. Ms. Husak said as part of the final development plan, Planning is proposing a condition regarding this. Ms. Husak said because the intersection improvements are not slated until 2013, there is some lag time as to when this will happen and Planning and Engineering is collaborating with the applicant in that endeavor. She said that Planning believes that there is much more that could be done in this area concerning landscaping and is requesting that the applicant continue to work with them and come back when the improvements are made to get a landscape plan approved for an entry feature that really speaks to Dublin as a high quality community. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 23 of 37 Ms. Husak said the proposed fuel station to be operated by Kroger is shown to have five pumping stations and a 120 - square -foot kiosk. She said the applicant proposes three spaces for stacking in the development text, and has shown that on the final development plan. She said there are waiting areas shown around the fuel station. Ms. Husak said as part of this approval, Planning proposes a condition that there not be any external merchandise allowed. She said the text proposes external merchandise of beverages and automotive products and they are included on the plans. Ms. Husak said Planning respectfully recommends that those would not be permitted. Ms. Husak said the striping shown south of the fuel truck delivery area includes an area that has a lot of pavement for the ingress /egress area and because there is a three -lane exit point onto Hospital Drive, the lane narrows down to a two -way. She said Planning requested that there be some vertical indication in the traffic pattern to help distinguish where the lanes are in and out of the fuel station. She said although the applicant has striped the area, both Planning and Engineering feel that some vertical element, whether it is a raised curb with brick or something much better suited in this area to help with distinguishing the traffic pattern. She said there appears to be issues with the delivery of fuel, which the applicant will discuss. Ms. Husak said the fuel station elevations include brick pillars with a stone course similar to the building materials currently on the shopping center and the same roofing materials and design. She said a beverage merchandise center underneath the canopy and the automotive product display is shown. She said there is a discrepancy existing between the size of the columns on the elevations and the plan, so the applicant has been asked to correct that. Ms. Husak said Planning is also requesting that the columns be moved out to hide the pumps on the north and south elevations, which would also give a better balance to how the roof is sitting on top of the columns. Ms. Husak explained that another proposed condition is regarding the logo shown behind the small signs located on the columns indicating the number of the pump at which you are dispensing fuel, which would not be permitted. She said that Planning is requesting that those details be revised. Ms. Husak said the landscaping is shown within the proposed islands with trees to screen the fuel station. Ms Husak said the proposed fuel station sign includes the Kroger name and a dollar amount required by law to be included on it. Ms. Husak said the applicant is proposing a bank in the outparcel area, but a tenant has not been secured at this time. She said that Planning is not certain that a bank is the best use. She said the area is not heavily used for parking, however there may be some Wendy's overflow parking located in the outparcel area. She said the applicant has in the existing development text and in the proposed development text, an additional square footage density that could be built onto this site. Ms. Husak said if the Commission were favorably looking upon an outparcel in this particular area, Planning would certainly work with the applicant at the final development plan stage which would come back to the Commission on an appropriate layout, parking, and landscaping to review and approve. Ms. Husak said that a motion is required for this rezoning with preliminary development plan for a recommendation to City Council of approval or disapproval. She said that Planning is recommending approval of the rezoning with preliminary development elan with one condition: 10 -001 Z /PDI' /f D 1' /C U Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pinal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010— Minutes Page 24 of 37 1) That the development text be revised to eliminate the provisions for the external merchandise and display for the fuel kiosk. Ms. Husak said for the final development plan, Planning is recommending approval with nine conditions: 1) That the proposed fuel station elevations be revised to eliminate the sale and display of merchandise outside the kiosk; 2) That the plans be revised to address inconsistencies regarding the size of the fuel station columns and that the column distance and location be revised so as to avoid a visual imbalance for the north and south elevations and to conceal the view of the pumps from the right -of -way; 3) That the turn radius at the intersection of the main east -west drive aisle and the north - south drive aisle adjacent to the Wendy's /Tim Horton's site be revised when the main access point modifications are constructed, subject to approval by Planning and Engineering; 4) That the plans include a vertical barrier element immediately south of the fuel station in order to clarify the traffic pattern to drivers, subject to approval by Planning and Engineering; 5) That flat, flush mounted lenses be used instead of the focus lenses for the fuel station canopy -lighting to meet the Zoning Code requirement; 6) That the brick course on the fuel station sign be relocated toward the bottom of to be consistent with the building architecture and that the reveal on either side of the sign be increased to one -foot to give the sign a more balanced appearance; 7) That the fuel station logo be removed from the background of the fuel pump numbers; 8) That all signs be setback eight feet from the right -of -way, sign height not be artificially increased by locating the signs on a mound and an encroachment approval is obtained if needed; and 9) That the applicant work with Planning on a revised entry feature design to be approved administratively and installed once the City has completed the access modifications. Ms. Husak said that Planning is recommending approval of the conditional use without any conditions because many of the design details of that are taken care of at the final development plan stage already. She explained that it was just the use of the fuel station that approval for is being requested. Ms. Husak said Planning is recommending approval of all three components of this application with the conditions previously mentioned. Charles Fraas, the applicant, representing Caste, the property owner thanked the Commission for letting him speak and staff who had worked with them for six to nine months working out changes and what they thought was a good plan for the shopping center. Mr. Fraas said they had issues regarding Conditions 2, 3, and 4, but agreed with the remaining conditions. He said they agreed to the first part of Condition 2. He said the second part of Condition 2 was with the columns. He said when they first submitted the plan, they had a canopy similar to what was seen across the street, which was more linear single pumps farther west. He said they saw that it took up more room and impacting parking in a way that would not Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 25 of 37 work right, so they redesigned the canopy with two pumps on each island. He said the main issues were operational, circulation, and aesthetics. He said from the aesthetic standpoint, moving those columns all the way out to the edge makes it feel like it is a table, and they do not think that is the best thing. He said operationally, they cannot move the pumps any closer. He said they are screening the fuel center so if there is a concern about visibility, it will allow the users of the Kroger gas to see the pumps and be able to get to them. He reiterated that they cannot move those pumps any closer together. Mr. Fraas said they were okay with Condition 3 regarding the outparcel turning radius, but they would like to work with staff on it because he was not sure a 65 -foot radius was possible. He said he would like to do that at the time of the final development plan for the outparcel because there may be other improvements. Mr. Fraas said regarding Condition 4, they were concerned about the vertical element. He said it was where the truck actually went to dispense the fuel. He said there are various operational, safety and other issues that they face in circulation. Andrew Gardner, Bird and Bull Engineering, said he had looked extensively on how to put a vertical element in there to separate the drive from the fuel center. He explained the issue was the 68 -foot long tanker truck that need to get in to service those tanks. He said the truck has to be within 20 feet of those tanks. He said the trucks' turning radius is quite tight, and they do not want it to have to make a lot of reversing maneuvers, especially in a fuel center situation where cars are circulating. He said moving it north with a landscape island would create a problem with the truck circulation. He said he had looked for other locations for the tanks around the center, and he ran into the same issue and the truck would have to route through the parking lot in some cases. He said ideally what they wanted to do was pull in, fuel the tanks, and then have the truck leave behind the Kroger store, as other delivery trucks do. He said going through the parking lot was not a safe condition and it creates other issues with turning radii. Mr. Gardner added that the area over the fuel tanks was concrete and the rest of the site is asphalt, so there is a visual differential between pavements. Mr. Fraas said they agreed to all of the other conditions. He asked if there were any open issues the Commission had. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there were any public comments regarding this application. [There was none.] Kevin Walter said that he did not care for these complicated cases. He said he would have a very hard time putting this through tonight as it is presented. He encouraged Planning to talk to applicants about splitting the application component up. Mr. Walter said he appreciated that the applicant said they had been working with staff for months but was concerned that the application is very complicated and mistakes happen when all components are reviewed together. Mr. Walter said he was not in favor of the combined applications. Ms. Husak explained that there was nothing in the Code that prevents someone from filing them together. She said it often makes sense to file them together because the applicant is quite far on the final development plan stage and the development text changes are the only reason a rezoning is required. She said the Commission is not tied to having to treat them together and 10- 001Z/PDP /FDl' /CU Rozoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Condietonal Use KrogerFue1 Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 —Minutes Page 26 of 37 they could focus on the preliminary development. plan and review the final development plan component, they are free to do so. Mr. Walter said he wanted to ensure that Planning needs to convey to applicants that this is not a preferred method to bring cases before the Commission and not likely to get through on the first time it is presented. Amy Kramb asked if the City was only doing the Hospital Drive access point, and the developer was responsible for the other access. Ms. Husak said that there were two plan components in the packet, on the Zoning Documents, Sheet 1.7, shows the construction responsibility that the City has worked out with the applicants. She said the City is building everything that is indicated in the dot pattern. Ms. Kramb asked if the City was building the parking spaces, water feature, and the future entry drive. Ms. Husak said the City was doing the construction, the pavement, but nothing as far as the landscaping is concerned with the entry feature. She said the reason why the dot pattern went across the water feature and that landscape area is because the City is closing the existing access point that is next to Wendy's. She said that the City is taking out the existing entry drive and doing the grading. Ms. Kramb asked if the north/south future drive, the revised parking, and the upgraded southern Hospital Drive entrance were the developer's responsibility. Ms. Husak said it was the developer's responsibility and it was part of the final development plan for the fuel station. She said with the fuel station being under construction, that part would also be constructed at that time. She said the two angled parking areas would not be part of that. Ms. Kramb asked when the required landscaping would be done. Ms. Husak said that would have to be required when the City completes the construction of the revised entry in the area, which would be at a later point. She said the landscape mound on Hospital Drive would remain the same. Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Discussion Ms. Amorose Groomes reiterated that this was a request for a change in the development text with the site plan adjustments that are part of the preliminary development plan. She asked that the Commission start their discussion with the text. Ms. Kramb referred to the Development Text, page 1, General #2 where it talks about the required access plan being shown on the preliminary, but that it is not actually for certain. She asked if that should be modified to say it was pending the final design by the City. She requested a modification to the last sentence, It is not however intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be preserved, its precise location may vary. Ms. Kramb said she was concerned that there was nothing in the proposed development text that said the six -foot high sign was not in addition to the existing mound, and asked if Condition 8 was clear enough. 10- 001z /1)DI> /1"Imcu Rczoning/Prelmtinaiy Development Plan/ I�inal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Purl Station "]()0 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 27 of 37 Ms. Husak explained that the Zoning Code talks about sign heights to some extent, and it includes language about not artificially increasing height, but Planning felt that Condition 8 would get to that point as well. She said that similar language could be in the text also. Ms. Kramb pointed out that on Page 3 of the proposed Development Text, it said that Planning gets to decide who uses the patios in this shopping center. She said she was uncomfortable with patios being administratively approved. Ms. Kramb referred to Page 5 where it mentioned that curb cuts should be permitted as shown on the preliminary development plan. She was concerned that this overlaps with the City's final design for the intersection improvement in the area. Ms. Kramb referred to Page 9 where it said there would be no project identification sign and said she did not know what that was. Ms. Husak explained that it meant it would not allow a sign that said Avery Square on Avery - Muirfield Drive because the parcel that the Avery Square shopping center sits on does not have any frontage on Avery - Muirfield Drive. Ms. Kramb referred to Page 10 where it mentions that there is no signage at all at the gas station, and said that is not true. She noted that they have their pump number identification signs. Mr. Walter said with respect to the development text, Page 2 — Signage and Graphics (D) — it stated that all uses along Avery - Muirfield Drive shall be allowed two ground signs, one oriented toward Avery - Muirfield, and one oriented on a second public street or internal access road on the west side. He asked what that meant. Ms. Husak explained that it permits two signs each for the restaurant outparcels, one is oriented toward Avery - Muirfield Drive and one oriented toward the internal access road behind the restaurants. Mr. Walter said it was a concern to him and he thought it should be deleted because that is similar to the Chase Bank issue. Mr. Hardt pointed out that here, the text allows it and there it did not. He said he read it as saying that they are allowed to have a sign on Avery - Muirfield Drive and they can have a second sign on either of the other public streets, which Code would allow, or at their option, they could put it on the internal drive. Mr. Walter said he thought or internal access should be stricken and in case it changes ownership, he would like to continue it as is and not allow them signage on the internal private street. Todd Zimmerman said that currently, the signs are just being used as identification markers. He said by taking the road out, it would change the whole criteria how they sit in the shopping center. He asked if it was an option in the past. Ms. Husak said it was done as Mr. Hardt explained, they allowed in this text to move the sign that they are permitted to have on Hospital Drive to the internal access road. Mr. Hardt said he had no heartburn over it because these are parcels fronting on two public streets that would be allowed two signs anyway. Ms. Amorose Groomes said as it is written, it is less problematic to have it on the private drive than it is on Hospital Drive. 10-001 Z/1'1)1 /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospitai Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 28 of 37 Mr. Walter said he had trouble with (F) which was permitting them two center identification signs. He asked why we needed center identification signs. He said it was just visual clutter because everybody knows that is Avery Center and that there are businesses there. He said it is huge and there is no reason to give them a monument sign. Ms. Husak explained that Code permits those two signs, and this language is more restrictive than the Code is as far as the height is concerned. She said that Planning had a similar discussion with the applicants why they needed to have it in the text, Code allows them to have it, and they have not been put up for ten years. She said the intention is to preserve the right to these signs as part of the final development plan application. Mr. Walter asked how the other Commissioners felt about it. Mr. Fishman said it did not help at all and there was no hardship by not marking Avery Square. He said they want to mark the retail center twice. He asked why two signs were needed. Ms. Husak said they were on two different roadways and they would not be seen at the same time. Mr. Walter, Mr. Fishman, and Ms. Amorose Groomes were in favor of striking (F). Ms. Husak pointed out that striking (F) does not eliminate them from having the signs. Mr. Walter suggested it be reversed to say that they are not allowed to have monument signs. Ms. Kramb agreed it should be written that way. Mr. Zimmerman said that there were many small independent shops in the center that go by the center's name. He said someone visiting Dublin does not have the same sense of direction as those who reside here. Mr. Walter asked Ms. Husak to craft a condition not allowing center identification signs. Mr. Walter referred to (H) No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising, and said that led him to believe that there was another purpose for applying them. He suggested no signs shall be applied to windows. Richard Taylor said that Code already specifically identifies what kind of signs can be applied to windows. Mr. Fraas said he worked on this center when it was first developed. He said he realized that people do not like graphics, but it was one of the reasons for success and failure of retail. He said they had a concern for retailers, especially when they put in the Yellow Pages, Located in Avery Square. He said they are not talking about a sign with tenant names, only something that identifies the center. He said they are not asking for the things being stricken. He said the rights were given to them as part of the long zoning negotiations 13 years ago and they are just taking them from the record. He said they are only asking for the same rights everybody else has and it seemed like they were having rights taken away that they would even have under the Code. He said it seemed unfair. Mr. Walter responded that the applicant has chosen to completely revise the develm,ment t.,t 10- oo1Z /PDPrnoP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 29 of 37 Mr. Fraas said that was not their choice. He said they only made small changes, and staff recommended additional updates. Mr. Walter said the Commission had revised Code in front of them and it was incumbent upon them to make sure that they are comfortable with the Code. He said this is one of the reasons why he did not like a co joined application because they are going to get through all of these things, line by line. He said he understood the comment about retail and signage, but that was not something he espoused. He said he did not believe that. Mr. Fraas explained that when the shopping center was originally developed, there was a zoning text for many subareas, including where the hospital was, the office buildings, and Walgreens and they were all different subareas. He said everything has been developed since then, so they still have these old Subareas B and B -1. He said as a way of cleaning up what has happened since then they agreed with staff it was a good idea to go ahead and clean it. Mr. Fraas said they did not submit that as their original changes, however they agreed with staff on all the text. He said it will make it easier from this point forward. He said any substantive text change was requested by staff. Mr. Walter referred to Page 3 at the top, No billboards or electrical or advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. He said there is already text that says what the signage for the tenant should be and that implied to him that a billboard electrical or advertising sign that carries the name of the tenant is allowed. Mr. Walter suggested that it be stricken from the text. He agreed with Ms. Kramb that (C) regarding being administratively approved should be stricken. He referred to 4 (C) Conditional Use, where he recommended that gas station be amended to fuel station. Mr. Walter referred to Page 5, Parking, number 2, Parking shall be provided at four spaces per 1,000 square feet NFA, and asked if NFA had been defined. He also was not comfortable putting a number in there. Mr. Langworthy said the definition of NFA, net floor area, would be defined in the Code changes. He said they would be discussing that also. Mr. Walter referred to Page 3, and said he was not sure that Drive -thru stacking with eight spaces per exchange window should be included since the number requirement has not yet been determined. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if it was a deviation from the original text. Ms. Husak said it did not. Mr. Walter said okay. Mr. Walter referred to Page 5, Fuel station stacking shall accommodate a minimum... and asked if shall and must were the same word. Ms. Kramb confirmed that it was the same word. Mr. Walter referred to Page 7, number 1, Any portion of a lot which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be landscaped. He asked for the definition of landscaped. Ms. Husak said it would probably mean seeded. Mr. Walter suggested that it should be clearer. Mr. Walter referred to Page 6, A and B, and said to strike those given the conditions discussed. 10 -001 Z /PDP /RDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminry Development Plan / Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Put Station 7100 Hosoital Drive. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 30 of 37 Mr. Hardt referred to Page 2 Signage, Item C where it talked about sign bases on the outparcels being wood, brick, stone or stucco. He said they have been built and they were stone, so it would be simpler to make stone the requirement going forward. Mr. Hardt referred to Page 3, Dining Areas (C), and said he agreed with Ms. Kramb. He was not comfortable yet with administrative approval of patios. Mr. Hardt referred to Page 5, Parking, Item 2, and said he agreed with Mr. Walter, and said that changing the parking ratio to refer to net floor area is a substantial change over what had been done in the past. He said the Code has always referred to gross floor area. He said whether this case or the next, he was not comfortable with that because net floor area is something that is so remarkably arguable that we will never come to a consensus. He suggested it be put back to gross floor area because it is the area inside the walls and is indisputable. Mr. Hardt referred to Page 7, Item 6, and said it was the same comment, and that he thought they could get rid of that because of the conditions discussed tonight. Mr. Hardt referred to Page 8, Materials, Item C where it talks about cedar shakes and shingles. He said the center has not been built with cedar shakes and shingles, so it seemed that should be modified to reflect what is actually built there. Mr. Hardt referred to Page 12, Parking and Loading regarding the outparcels, and said Items 2 and 3 stipulate that the Wendy's parcel shall have 62 spaces and the Burger King parcel shall have 53 spaces. He said he understood that those are the parking spaces approved to date for those two facilities, however if the parcels were ever redeveloped, he was not comfortable with an emphatic statement that 62 spaces is always the right number of parking spaces. He suggested `Parking space requirement for the southern outparcel shall be 62 spaces, unless it is redeveloped'. Mr. Zimmerman referred to Page 3, Retail Center (C) and requested that off -site storage of patio amenities from November 1 until April 1 be added. Mr. Walter agreed. Mr. Zimmerman said regarding administrative approval, three patios have currently been established in the center, and a pattern of what the Commission is looking for has been established, fences, tables, chairs, flower boxes and things like that. He said they already know it is up to 3,000 square feet, so any new patio space would be deducted from that. He said they were not looking at Kroger as a multi- million dollar budget, he was looking for the little guy with a diner who comes in for a patio and pays a large fee. He said basically, it will be approved if it meets Code and what the Commission has done in the past. Mr. Zimmerman said that was a hardship on a small proprietor because $1,800 was a lot of money that they could use for the patio. He said in these economic times he thought an administrative approval would fit just for this center. Ms. Kramb said she agreed with Mr. Zimmerman, but her concern was that if the patio was administratively approved, there is no public comment or awareness. She said the neighboring business that might have a problem if it does not get to be heard. Ms. Amorose Groomes said an application was necessary, even if it was administratively approved, so it would not change the out -of- pocket expense. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 31 of 37 Ms. Husak explained that it would be an application for Certificate of Zoning Plan Approval which has a $130 fee for a commercial establishment versus the Conditional Use /Amended Final Development Plan which is around $1,000. Mr. Zimmerman said the tenant would not be encroaching on any other space. Mr. Walter said the concern he had was the two outparcels which were more than likely to have a restaurant coming in that has a significant patio with it that we've had issue on Avery - Muirfreld that they have talked about. He asked how that would be handled. Mr. Hardt said this text falls under the Retail Center section of the text. Ms. Husak clarified that it did not include the existing outparcels. Mr. Walter said he agreed with Mr. Zimmerman's point. Mr. Taylor agreed that the fee was certainly a consideration, but they were discussing an existing center. He recalled when the Commission approved the Sunnyside Street Cafe they discussed the planters, door, and fence locations in great detail. He said if this was a brand new center with adequate space allowed for patios that may become enclosed in the future, there is no problem. He said in a center where there are predetermined sidewalks, columns, and all those things that exist that will impact that. He said he thought they should look at how that is going to impact the pedestrian traffic along the sidewalk. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked the Commissioners to remember where they are in the discussion. She asked that Ms. Husak list all the Commissioners suggestions tonight so that they could come to an agreement on what stays and goes in the development text, and then ask the applicant to speak. Mr. Zimmerman asked what would happen to the fuel station if Kroger left. Ms. Husak said the text maybe is not as clear as it could be on a fuel station to be operated by the grocery store and that was certainly something they could address. Mr. Zimmerman suggested similar to what the Commission did to BJ's, if Kroger does not exist, the fuel station is eliminated, the tanks are dug up, and it can be returned to a grass area, asphalt, or a retail store. He said the fuel station was an amenity to Kroger, it was not because another fuel station was needed in Dublin. Mr. Fishman said that could easily be put in the development text and it would eliminate all the problems. Mr. Langworthy said they were getting to the point where there are too many issues to get to a motion tonight. He said Planning would take notes and bring it back to the Commission. He said they understood what the Commission wanted, but it would take some language manipulating. Mr. Fishman said he thought everyone had done a good job of reviewing this development text and had covered everything for which he had issues. 10 -001 Z /PD P /PDP /CU Rezoning /Prcliminaiy Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Duel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 32 of 37 Mr. Taylor said he preferred that outdoor dining be made a conditional use. He said regarding the two monument signs, he was in favor of the sign on the south side entry feature, but said it was too big for the Perimeter Drive area. He said he did not have a problem with a center identification sign there because from a driver's standpoint, all the driveways look the same, and having one that identifies that as the entry he was in favor, but it needs to be much smaller. Ms. Husak asked if that sign should be smaller than 10, 8 or 6 feet. Mr. Taylor said smaller than the one shown. Ms. Husak explained that 15 feet are allowed on Hospital Drive and 10 feet on Perimeter Drive. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that a 15 -foot sign on Hospital Drive was problematic. Mr. Taylor said he was in favor of a decent sized sign on Hospital Drive and a much smaller sign on Perimeter. Mr. Walter asked why the sign was needed on Hospital Drive. He said they are talking about creating an entry feature that will be dramatic. Mr. Taylor said the large entry feature sign was okay, but it needed to be integrated into a very heavy landscape and entry package of which this is just a part, as opposed to the central monument sign. He said he did not want the Las Vegas sign there with everything else desert around there. He said it needs to be lost in lots of other stuff going on there. Mr. Taylor said he wished the Commissioners would stop belying stucco, because it was a great material. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she agreed with much that had been said, but she was going to hold her opinion on the signage because she would like to see it put into practice before she would be willing to include it in the text. She said she would like to see what the text is going to permit and what the intention is to put out there before she votes. She said a 15 -foot sign is not going to be appropriate, but something lower that would not be a billboard was preferred. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she was okay with administrative approval of the outdoor dining as long as it is consistent with what is there. Ms. Kramb said she was willing to change her mind about administrative approval, but she did not want to set a precedent that the Commission is doing it with every shopping center. She wanted it to be clear why they would do it with this one. She said it was because it would look like the others and follow the same dimensions. She said she could be persuaded by how the text is written. Mr. Walter said he changed his mind and supported Mr. Zimmerman's amendment. Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed that Mr. Taylor and she were okay with administrative approval of patios. Mr. Fishman said he halfway agreed and would like to see it written. Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed that Mr. Zimmerman and Mr. Hardt were in favor of it. Preliminary Development Site Plan Discussion Ms. Amorose Groomes said the access points were relatively determined by the roadway improvements. I0 -001 Z /1 P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ f=inal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 33 of 37 Mr. Taylor asked if they were talking about the new entry feature. Ms. Husak reiterated that reviewing two applications at the same time was somewhat awkward. She said the details for those kinds of things would be discussed at the final development plan, so the layout of the fuel station and where it is located on the site can be saved for the final development plan. She said the access, landscaping can also be saved. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she wanted to talk about that now because she did not want to waste the applicant's time. Ms. Husak explained that the only thing that the preliminary addresses is the outparcel. She said all the other things listed as part of the preliminary development plan are also part of the discussion of the final development which is also on the agenda tonight. Ms. Amorose Groomes suggested the Commission discuss the fuel station site layout and those things. Mr. Taylor wanted to talk about the entry feature first. He agreed that it needed to be pretty dramatic, but the problem that he saw with that was the lack of hierarchy. He did not see this correcting that problem. He said when he drove into the center now, all the roads are the same size and width and he did not get the feeling that he had entered the site. He said the way this comes to a `T' intersection with a road similar in width, maybe even slightly wider, he did not get the sense that he came into a grand entryway. He suggested that in the redesign of the entry feature along with a wonderful sign, intense landscaping and lots of stuff that is going on, that the road declare itself as an entryway. He said it could be a divided road with a landscape median down the center, something that said this is, without question, the entryway. Mr. Taylor said when that joins the east/west connector road which really gets you into the entire balance of the site, he thought there should be something other than a simple left and right turn lane there. He said something more substantial was needed that brings you to that intersection that says you have arrived at this point and now you have choices to make. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she had strong opinions about the area of parking to the north of the fuel station. She said she thought this area of parking really was unnecessary. She said there is so much parking on this site, it is hard to figure where to park with so many options. She said she would like to see this parking go away. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she agreed with Mr. Taylor and said that this entrance would become a much nicer entrance probably with water on either side of it. She said she would like to see the outparcel put west and that the north -south drive through the parking lot not continue this direction because she thought this was a dangerous route with a lot of cars coming up and down, parking in these aisles, and you do not know you are in a drive aisle until you get there and it is almost too late. She said that Wendy's /Tim Horton's have much overflow parking that is used for trucks and buses. She reiterated that she would like to see the outparcel move to the west, the roadway cut off and this circulation come around of the perimeter with the removal of the parking south of the entry drive and reverted to greenspace. Mr. Walter said he agreed completely. He said he thought the one thing they did not want to replicate and they were in danger of doing it there, is the DSW parF I f a _ - - -- cu � +I Rezoning /Preliminary Development Ilan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 34 of 37 McDonald's is on Sawmill and SR 161 when you come in and the incoming traffic does not stop. He said he thought the site plan needed to be reworked. He said he thought the fuel station needed to be moved to the north a little. He said he was uncomfortable with cars coming in and turning into the fuel station. It would recreate what is in the center now. Ms. Kramb said she was okay with the location of the fuel station, but it would be nice to push it north farther. Mr. Fishman said he agreed that the entrance needed a water feature on either side and landscaping, so when the fuel station is moved up, it softens the whole thing and makes the entrance dramatic. Mr. Zimmerman said by changing the proposed bank outparcel to the north it would make you drive from one end to the other to get out of the center. He said the shortest point would be used. Ms. Husak said one positive aspect of having the north and south drive was that you are able to avoid having to go where a lot more pedestrian traffic is going back and forth between the parking spaces and the tenants that it does not force all the vehicles to go in front to find a place to park. Mr. Walter suggested that if the drive aisles were aligned and the building was shifted west, it would allow you to come in, make the turn, make that a four -way stop, and it would probably accomplish what everyone wants. He agreed with Mr. Zimmerman that a good access across the facility was good too. Mr. Taylor said he did not like the alignment of that with the main entry. Mr. Walter agreed. Mr. Langworthy said that Planning would like to discuss that with Engineering because it puts a lot of turn movements in close proximity to one another. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would not be in favor of an outparcel where it is located on the drawing because it would be very problematic for the center and cause a lot of hardship. Mr. Walter agreed. Mr. Walter asked to see the close up of the fuel station. He said he thought the island should be removed. He said it did not make sense because it messed up the east /west connector. Mr. Taylor referred to the earlier discussion about moving the pillars and said he understood that there was some math that determines where the pumps are located. He said it seemed that the piers on the Sawmill fuel station were on the outside of the pumps. Mr. Fraas said the pumps were in line and there was not a double pump. He said there was only one pump per island, and it was between the two columns. He said they agreed to take it out, but the issue was that they tried to make this a little more compact, whereas it was much larger before. He said the canopy went from being relative long with one pump in each island to being shrunken into now having only three islands and having two pumps on two of those islands. Mr. Taylor said he was fine with the pump locations as shown, as long as the landscaping doing its job of screening from the road. 10 -001 Z /PD P /F DP /CJ) aezoning/Pretlminary Development Flan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional (ise Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 35 of 37 Mr. Hardt said he understood staffs notion of putting the pumps inboard of the columns to try to shield them from view. He said we live in a three- dimensional world and in reality; those pumps are never really shielded by the pillars. He gave the Shell station across the street as an example where it did not work. He said he was okay with the pumps being outside of the pillars, although the canopy does still look lopsided to him. He suggested the pillars and pumps be spread apart a little so that there is more of a sense of proportion there. Mr. Hardt said he had a problem with the roof. He said he understood that dimensionally they did not want to take it up to a peak and that there needs to be a flat spot on top of that canopy, but he thought the surface area of the roof seen is too small for the size of the structure. He said given the pitch, standing anywhere near the fuel station, you would not even see the roof surface. He said he would like to see that adjusted a little. Ms. Amorose Groomes commented about the selected plant materials. She noted the 2 -inch caliper at installation single -stem serviceberry proposed and said that they do not do well and are intended to a multi- stemmed tree and when they are made into a single -stem form, they do not perform well. She would like to see that changed to a Madonna crabapple or another similar ornamental tree with natural single -stem condition. Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that there was a lot of Juniper groundcover on the island beds surrounding the fuel station and all of the Juniper groundcover at the entryway to the grocery store has failed. She said she would like to see more of a perennial planting or something that would provide color in those areas that would not be destroyed by snow removal operations and things of that nature underneath the tree canopies. Mr. Walter said the center landscaping is poor. He asked if there was a standard that should be applied to widen those beds or make them more lush in this and the outparcel. Ms. Amorose Groomes said trees are being asked to grow in an impossible condition. She said the poorly constructed islands are too narrow to support a tree of any maturity, and filled with soil that really is not capable of providing nutrients. Ms. Amorose Groomes said as a community we need to change our thinking on parking lot islands and the width needed as much greater than they are at this center. When looking at large centers in the future we need not try to grow trees in them or we need to make them appropriate where a tree can actually grow in them. She said she is hoping the fuel station layout will be changing significantly and they will have the opportunity to create those when moving its location. She indicated the island to the north end is much more substantial. She said there is one island that is creating problems immediately to the west of the fuel station and there are two trees slated to grow there which will not work. She asked that the island be beefed up to the other islands' size. She suggested that shifting the fuel station to the north can create more room on the east -west island, get more substantial southwest corner and with perennial plantings in the base of them they would not look at dead junipers all year long. Mr. Fishman said they are looking to eliminate some parking so that there can be lush islands. Ms. Amorose Groomes agreed and said that would make room for a lot of water features and make more turf area and to make it look nice. io- oolZ/PnP/PDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger t Station 7100 Hospital Dnvc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 36 of 37 Mr. Hardt said he would like to disagree about eliminating the island that would open the throat up and traffic movements would become a free for all. He agreed it should be modified so that landscaping could survive in it, but it should remain. Mr. Hardt would like the cart corrals be installed at the preferred option. Mr. Fishman and Mr. Zimmerman agreed. Mr. Walter said he read in the staff report that there is no longer a requirement for awnings. Ms. Husak explained the language in the text was exactly the same as it was for the Perimeter Center shopping center where there were three signs allowed per tenant, a sign on the wall, a projecting blade sign and a sign on the awning, and they asked the applicant to delete the awning sign option because no tenant has used it. Mr. Walter said they are still going to have awnings. Ms. Husak agreed. Ms. Kramb asked if the outparcel on the preliminary plan had been approved on previous concept versions. Ms. Husak said it is a brand new contemplation to have an additional building on that site, they are not asking for additional square footage that they do not have a right to now, but there has not been a building shown on the site as it is now. Ms. Kramb said it is totally fresh and up in the air at this point. Ms. Husak agreed. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that everyone is in agreement that a fuel station should be a conditional use on this property. Mr. Fraas said there have been a lot of good comments that they can make better, and there are things they can not do because the economics including the location of the gas station and the drive to the north and south drive aisle. He said that the parking field is critical to the operations of the tenants and they are at the end of the operating parking for Kroger and they can not loose spaces. He said they are going to work with staff and try and get it cleaned up and brought back in a way that will really work, but there are going to be some things that will be difficult to do. Ms. Kramb said if the location of the outparcel does not change she would not be in favor of the outparcel, the location is not a good spot to put another building on the property, but the fuel station she is willing to work with. Mr. Frans said originally they met with staff to get more density on this site maybe with a multi - tenant building, but they do not work financially, that is why they are coming in with a more realistic proposal. He said that if they shift the outparcel down they are dealing with a right -in right -out and the roundabouts so the circulation is a consideration. Mr. Walter said the center is fine as it is. He said he felt that if the fuel station and outparcel do not move and the entry feature is not there, they will not get his vote. Mr. Fraas said this is a huge investment in the community and he thinks they need to think of the customers, that this is going to be good for the City of Dublin. Motion and Vote Mr. Taylor made a motion to table this application. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. The applicant agreed. The vote was as follows: Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; 10 -001 Z /PDP /l D P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plen/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuei Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 8, 2010 — Minutes Page 37 of 37 Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Tabled 7 — 0.) 4. The Spa at Riv idge 6570 Riverside Drive 10 -029CD DDS Corr' r Development District Minor /Si Chris Amo Groomes introduced this applicati nvolving architectural modificatio or an existi rick building that includes the re al of four garage doors. She sai ' was also a uest to reface two existing grow signs. She swore in those imen ' g to address the Commission on this case includ' the applicant, Edward Pollina, Pro tonal Designs Inc. and City representatives. Ms. Amorose omes confirmed Richard Taylor's s ion regarding this consent case require aKesentation. / 'Mr. Taylor suggested the existingogenings be articulated; instead finis ' g the openings flush with the existing building fa e. He expressed concern about ntal&iing the existing brick and mortar as proposed. vWard Pollina said they had a solid c on the brick and the mortar to make it appear a e garage doors were never there. / Mr.1 aylor said if it matched, that was fin Amy Kramb asked when the porary sign would be replaced wit permanent sign, because she was concerned how g the temporary sign could remain. Jennifer Ra said there were time limits asso ' ed with temporary signs, which perm t sign is constructed in a timely maw er. Mr. Pollina said once approved y would install a permanent sign. ! Ms. Amorose Motio nd Vote aylor made the motion to approv 18 Corridor Development District a cation because the proposed signs and architect modifications are consistent with t oning Code and with existing development in th ea. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the on. public comments regardingAhi application. [There were The vote was ollows: Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Kram es; Mr. Walter, yes; Mr. Fis Ms. Am se Groomes im , yes; Mr. Zmerman, and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 s. Amorose Groomes adjourned t in at l l :1lp.m. / As approved and Zoning Commission 19, 2010. 1' 10- 001Z /PDP/ DP /C11 Rezoni) /Preliminary Development Plan / Pinal Dc velopment Plan /Conditional llse Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 71 RECORD OF ACTION DECEMBER 8, 2005 CITY OF DUBLIN- toad Use oad W9 Range Pkaaiag sROO sNerRings Rood Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone: 6144104600 Fax: 6144104747 Web Mr. waw.dubhn.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Amended Final Development Plan — 05- 066AFDP — Riverside PCD — Kroger Expansion — 7100 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 10.21 acres located on the west side of Perimeter Loop Road, approximately 500 feet west of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside PCD, Subarea B). Request: Review and approval of an amended final development plan under Code Section 153.053. Proposed Use: A 17,336 - square -foot expansion to an existing 72,981- square -foot grocery store. Applicant: Dublin Oaks Limited, 191 Nationwide Boulevard, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215; represented by Todd Dove, Moody Nolan, Inc., 300 Spruce Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410- 4644/Email: jadkins @dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To approve this Amended Final Development Plan because the addition is in compliance with appropriate development texts and plans for the area, it will be in keeping with the existing land use character and physical development potential of the area, and it will provide adequate pedestrian access to the hospital site, with three conditions: 1) That plans be revised to indicate the location of the five -foot sidewalk at the south end of the site as coordinated with the Dublin Methodist Hospital site and that all required cross access documents be submitted prior to building permit issuance, subject to staff approval; 2) That a revised landscape plan be submitted that indicates the additional interior parking lot planting area required for the addition; and Page I oft 10- 001Z /PD1)/FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final �I Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION DECEMBER 8, 2005 1. Amended Final Development Plan — 05- 066AFDP — Riverside PCD — Kroger Expansion — 7100 Perimeter Loop Road (Continued) 3) That the site design meets Stormwater Regulations to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and that the applicant submit the required information to ensure compliance. Todd Dove, Moody Nolan Inc., representing the applicant, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Qa;e Adkins Planner Page 2 of t 10- 0012 /PDP /ro` /CU Rezon ink /Preliminary Devel opmcnt Plan/ Final al Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger l-uel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — Decembe 8, 2005 Page 3 Mr. Gerbe in" for the unanimous eptance of the documen into the record. There opposi " n and so the documents e accepted into the reco (Approved 6 -0.) Jde'garding the November 3 005 minutes, Mr. San e z requested that the first sentence on Page 11 be corrected t ead: "Mr. Sant s an overall review of the ent Community Plan is taking place d now, ..." He also re sled that the last sentenc n the bottom of Page 15 be corrected: a said it still meets the t " Mr. Ger r moved for approval the November 3, 2005 eeting minutes with the ove ame ents. Mr. Zinn econded the motion, and e vote was as follows: s. Jones, y Mr. Saneholtz, yes; s. Boring, absent; Ms. eiss, yes; Mr. Gerber, es; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Ap ed 5 -0.) Mr. Gerber note at the November 10 m ing minutes did not see o be quite as formal as other minute a had seen. He said s etimes the Commission say things jokingly or enterta' nt; and now they are p ing up in the minutes. said the first thing he iced was o age 3, third from last p graph where he asked if e CORN was related to ield of C . He said the comme was made in jest and asked that it be elimin d from the ermanent record. Mr. Gerber also erred to the last sentence Page 16 of the Novem"In utes, and asked that the extr ous letter "o" be deleted. , On P e 20, fourth paragraph m the bottom of the ember 10 minutes, Mr erber re ested that the word "if' a added so the sentence ads: Mr. Gerber repea that it is " ificredibly important that ry resident is heard on and that if there is some of global settlement to work o at everybody has been ' cluded in the process. a said in the next paragraph, below at, the last line should ay: "...to staff, or thr gh instead of to our homes... ". / :Mr. Ge er said wZge d he was surZtheremi a otherXlight . Reiss referred ge 10 of the minutesgraph, and first sentence: ow the applgating tss for the property nort h erty. Mr. Gerber ed that the November 1 minutes re turn to staff &that the:be brought ba to the next eeting. He said it was no cessary to table the mi es. Gerber reviewed the r onsibilities of The Pl g and Zoning Com ' n. He noted that the only consent ag da item was Case 1. [ e cases were heard in tublished agenda order.] 1. Amended Final Development Plan — 05- 066AFDP — Riverside PCD — Kroger Expansion — 7100 Perimeter Loop Road 10 -001 Z/PDP /RDP /C U Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Idospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — December 8, 2005 Page 4 There were no Commission questions or issues regarding this consent item. Rick Gerber swore in those who intended to testify in regards to this case. Todd Dove, Moody Nolan, Inc., representing the applicant, agreed to the following conditions contained in the staff report: 1) That plans be revised to indicate the location of the five -foot sidewalk at the south end of the site as coordinated with the Dublin Methodist Hospital site and that all required cross access documents be submitted prior to building permit issuance, subject to staff approval; 2) That a revised landscape plan be submitted that indicates the additional interior parking lot planting area required for the addition; and 3) That the site design meets Stormwater Regulations to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and that the applicant submit the required information to ensure compliance. Mr. Gerber moved for approval of this Amended Final Development Plan because the addition is in compliance with appropriate development texts and plans for the area, it will be in keeping with the existing land use character and physical development potential of the area, and it will provide adequate pedestrian access to the hospital site, with the above three conditions. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) 2. ended Final Developme Ian 05- 175AFDP — P ' rose School Fence — 641 ost Road Gerber swore in those w intended to testify in re ds to this case. Joanne Ochal present slides and highlighted staff report. A Final De opment Plan was approved on Jan 2005 which included a -foot ornamental iron fe e. The applicant now wants to repla the approved four -foot ce with a six -foot fence the same type to enclos the playgr d equipment. The app r ed internal four -foot fenc 11 remain to divide the ay Xs. Ochal said recently ap oved daycares complied yiffi the four -foot limitatio . She said staff does not support the a tcation's proposal at this ' 6e and respectfully reco ends disapproval of this request with a bases listed in the staff port: 1) The Fin evelopment Plan as a oved will have no adver impact upon the health safe , or general welfare of the mmunity. 2) ilaz daycazes in Du bl' ave complied with four- of height limitations co istent with the Fence Code. Gerber asked why tjic -foot fence was Jeff Caldwell, thelapplicant, said the six- fooXence was for the safety oAe children. 10 -001 Z /PDP /roP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FUC Station 710011ospital Drivc PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 4, 2004 CITY OF DUBLIN. Uivisioo of Pluu69 5000 Shier -Rags flood tMtblin, 06a 43016.1236 rhm/190: 614A104600 Tuz 614AIOA747 Web Site: w .&Vn.ohm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Revised Development Plan /Conditional Use 04- 023RDP /CU — Avery Square Addition — 6355 -7090 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 15.05 acres located on the south side of Perimeter Drive, 600 feet west of Perimeter Loop Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development plan under the PCD provisions of Section 153.058, and a conditional use request for outdoor seating under the provisions of Section 153.236. Proposed Use: An 14,557- square foot addition to an existing 106,045- square foot retail building that includes a 1,155- square foot outdoor dining patio. Applicant: Dublin Oaks Limited, 191 West Nationwide Boulevard, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215; represented by Charles Fraas, Caste, 191 West Nationwide Boulevard, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. MOTION #1: To approve the development plan because it is in accord with appropriate plans for the area, it will be in keeping with the existing land use character and physical development potential of the area, and appropriate parking is available, with eight conditions: 1) That the rear service area be restriped to provide for employee parking, and that a revised as -built plan showing 'all existing/proposed building spaces, existing/proposed square footages, and parking spaces be submitted, subject to staff approval; 2) That a revised landscape plan be submitted that includes all required additional site landscaping, subject to staff approval; 3) That plans be submitted indicating the location of sewer and water service for the site, subject to staff approval; 4) That the site design comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 5) That revised elevations be submitted indicating materials consistent with tine existing building, subject to staff approval; 10 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Page 1 of 2 Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 4, 2004 2. Revised Development Plan /Conditional Use 04- 023RDP /CU — Avery Square Addition — 6355 -7090 Perimeter Loop Road (Continued) 6) That dumpster enclosure doors remain closed at all times with the "standard" Dublin restrictive warning signs, and that all other non - typical signage be prohibited; 7) That all lighting comply with the text and City of Dublin Exterior Lighting Guidelines, and coordinate with the existing building; and 8) That no additional sign standards be placed on the proposed addition that is not compatible with existing signage for the center, subject to staff approval. * Charles Frass agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This development plan was approved. MOTION #2: To approve this conditional use application because the use is a conditional use of the zoning district, and the applicable development standards in the zoning ordinance are met, with four conditions: I) That displaying signage on the proposed umbrellas for the outdoor dining area is prohibited and arrangements for the off - season storage of the umbrellas is required, subject to staff approval; 2) That all patio furniture coordinates with the architecture and color of the building, subject to staff approval; 3) That fencing match the BW3 fencing (6595 Perimeter Drive), and planting beds be compatible with the center; and 4) That exterior sound system be limited to soft music and that the sound be imperceptible from the north side of Perimeter Drive after 11 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and midnight on Friday and Saturday, be subject to restrictions of any future Dublin noise ordinance. * Charles Fraas agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This conditional use application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Frank A. Ciarochi Acting Planning I 10- 001Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Page 2 Of 2 Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 16 9) That ncerns of pedest n connectivity withi this retail center 'd to the south be Fir rly provided for r tdents to the north of st Road; 10) at the text be revi to include no financ' services in Subaz A3; 11 That text langua regarding daycare, revised to includ age limit of 13 ye or under; and 12) That the iss s of odor control be back to the prior to t}K development plan st,-4e Mr. Ger pft seconded the mot! Mr. Hale m was follows: Ms. Reiss, es; Mr. i ll M erber, yes; and Ms. oring, yes. (Appr Mr. Gerber thanked r. Hale and Mr. Gb of r the conditions Mr. Saneholtz, 6 -0.) for their hard work. Administrative Business At 9 p.m., Mr. Gerber called a short recess. for further d above. The vote Mr. Messineo, yes; 2. Revised Development Plan /Conditional Use 04- 023RDP /CU — Avery Square Addition — 6355 -7090 Perimeter Loop Road Mr. Gerber said there are two applications being considered, a revised development plan and a conditional use. Separate votes will be required. Since both were administrative cases, those who intended to speak before the Commission were swore -in. Jamie Adkins said this site is located north of SR 161, west of Avery- Muirfreld Drive. She showed slides of the site. The Avery Square shopping center is L- shaped and has two outparcels on Avery- Muirfield Drive. The site is zoned PCD as part of the larger Riverside PCD. Surrounding parcels are zoned PCD, as well. Ms. Adkins said the proposed addition is a vacant site that would connect two portions of the shopping center, as originally shown on the approved preliminary development plan. In general, landscaping, parking, etc. for this addition were installed previously. Four tenant spaces are proposed for this addition with two outdoor dining areas. The total square footage of this addition is 14,557 square feet, and the patio area is 1,155 square feet. Ms. Adkins said staff recommends approval of the development plan with eight conditions: 1) That the rear service area be restriped to provide for employee parking, and that a revised as- built plan showing all existing/proposed building spaces, existing/proposed square footages, and parking spaces be submitted, subject to staff approval; 2) That a revised landscape plan be submitted that includes all required additional site landscaping, subject to staff approval; 3) That plans be submitted indicating the location of sewer and water service for the site, subject to staff approval; 4) That the site design comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 5) That revised elevations be submitted indicating materials consistent with the existing building, subject to staff approval; to- oolz /PDP/FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 17 6) That the dumpster enclosure doors remain closed at all times, and that all non - typical signage on the doors be be prohibited; 7) That all lighting comply with the text, and City of Dublin Exterior Lighting Guidelines, and coordinate with the existing building; and 8) That no additional sign standards be placed on the proposed addition that is not compatible with existing signage for the center, subject to staff approval. Ms. Adkins said staff also recommends approval of this conditional use application with three conditions: 1) That displaying signage on the proposed umbrellas for the outdoor dining area is prohibited, and arrangements for off - season storage of the umbrellas is required, subject to staff approval; 2) That all patio furniture coordinate with the architecture and color of the building, subject to staff approval; and 3) That fencing and planting beds be compatible with the center. Charlie Fraas, Casto, representing the applicant, showed renderings of the proposed addition. He said their goal is to make the addition so seamless that you can not tell what was there previously. He agreed to the conditions above for both the development plan and the conditional use. Mr. Fraas said architecturally, they made this compatible with the north elevation, with the curvature of the arches, the height of the roof, identical materials, brick and stone throughout the entire center. The same roof materials are being used. He said in regards to the conditional use, they are trying to allow for outdoor dining. He said restaurants are much needed in Dublin. They are trying to create an outdoor space by recessing the building so they can attract quality restaurants. He said they are willing comply with any of the typical requirements for outdoor seating. Mr. Zimmerman asked if the fence between the two tenants would be the same as at the BW3 outdoor patio. Mr. Fraas agreed. Mr. Zimmerman noted that an outdoor sound system was proposed. Mr. Fraas said they were discussing having that ability. When they did BW3, there were certain conditions that the volume decrease after certain hours. As a shopping center owner, they would from a contractional standpoint want to keep sound within the confines of that area. He thought the concern at BW3 was hearing music across Post Road. Mr. Fraas said because of the distance and configuration of the buildings, they will want it quiet. They have existing tenants that do not want anything loud. He said they will keep that within the regulations of whatever is permitted in the Dublin Code. Mr. Zimmerman said outdoor speakers have not been allowed in the past. He asked if they were addressed in the shopping center text. S0.00RL /t'IDP /rDP /S:U Rezoning /Prelimonary Deveiolrrnent, Plan/ Full;. Development Plan /Conditional Use 1(j ogcr Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 18 Mr. Gerber emphasized there were two applications being considered and he wanted to keep them separate for the record. He said procedurally, it was best to first talk about the revised development plan and then the conditional use. Ms. Boring was concerned about the rear elevation. She said it was a huge issue when the center was first reviewed. Mr. Fraas said it was identical to the rest of the center. Daryl Papa, the architect, said the brick water table extends the entire length, and there will be synthetic stucco detailing consistent with the building portions to the south and north. Ms. Boring said it did not appear that the mechanicals were screened on the plans. Mr. Papa said gas/electric meter sets were indicated, which need to be open for access. It was similar to all the others in the shopping center. Mr. Fraas said there would not be a loading dock, only a service door, and he stated that the meters will be painted to match the rear wall. Ms. Boring added to Condition 6:... and that dumpster enclosure doors remain closed at all times with the standard Dublin restrictive warning signs. Ms. Boring said when brick is added, the change in color is sometimes noticeable. She assumed the brick will match so it does not stand out. Mr. Papa said the same brick is still available. The first phases were done in 1996 and 1997, and they are proposing the same manufacturer and type of brick Ms. Reiss asked if the outdoor seating would be in an area with a roof. Mr. Papa said part of it will, depending upon the table layout. Ms. Reiss asked if there were plans to enclose the patio area with fencing or a wall. Mr. Fraas said they would like to do what they have done at BW3 for consistency throughout the center. The reason they are asking for this conditional use is because it is very important for them to have the ability to market it. Mr. Gerber reminded everyone that the conditional use application was to be discussed after the revised development plan. Ms. Boring made the motion to approve the development plan because it is in accord with appropriate plans for the area, it will be in keeping with the existing land use character and physical development potential of the area, and appropriate parking is available, with eight conditions: 1) That the rear service area be restriped to provide for employee parking, and that a revised as- built plan showing all existing/proposed building spaces, existing/proposed square footages, and parking spaces be submitted, subject to staff approval; 2) That a revised landscape plan be submitted that includes all required additional site landscaping, subject to staff approval; A 0- 0017 /PDXPF'DP /0J Rezoning /Preliminary Developmem Plan/ Fillai Development F )an /Conditional Use {roger ruel Station. ?300 hospital Dn vc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 19 3) That plans be submitted indicating the location of sewer and water service for the site, subject to staff approval; 4) That the site design comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 5) That revised elevations be submitted indicating materials consistent with the existing building, subject to staff approval; 6) That dumpster enclosure doors remain closed at all times with the "standard" Dublin restrictive warning signs, and that all other non - typical signage be prohibited; 7) That all lighting comply with the text and City of Dublin Exterior Lighting Guidelines, and coordinate with the existing building; and 8) That no additional sign standards be placed on the proposed addition that is not compatible with existing signage for the center, subject to staff approval. Mr. Fraas clarified that the building elevation the Commission was approving was the one shown tonight since there were some minor changes. He agreed with the conditions as listed above. Mr. Gerber seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Messineo, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; and Ms. Boring, yes; (Development Plan Approved 6 -0.) Conditional Use Ms. Reiss clarified that the same type of fencing would be used to enclose the patio as was used at BW3. Mr. Fraas agreed. Ms. Reiss said all she found was the existing text, and she was looking for something that said the same type of fencing would be used. Ms. Adkins said the text only restricts chain link or wire fencing. She said a request for a certain type of fencing could be a condition. Ms. Reiss asked if any changes had been made to the text. Ms. Adkins indicated that the text was not changed because it is not a rezoning. Ms. Adkins asked if there should be an amendment to Condition 3 to say that it matches the BW3 fencing. Ms. Reiss agreed. Mr. Zimmerman asked about the sound system restriction in the text. Ms. Adkins said it is not in the text, but it is a condition of approval for the BW3 patio. Mr. Zimmerman asked if Mr. Fraas would agree to a condition regarding the sound system. Mr. Fraas had no problem, but wanted flexibility. He said sometimes it is nice to sit outside enjoying a meal with light music. He said office buildings to the north will buffer the sound. Mr. Zimmerman said it would something the Commission had restricted on all outdoor patios. Ms. Boring clarified that it had been site - dependent in most cases. Mr. Fraas agreed to repeat the same sound system restrictions as fc uta- aotz. /Pov /nor /e at RUWlIng/Prelimina y i Plan /binul Deve)oumcmn plan /cOroamnal us(-, kzoz #er hue[ Station ?) 00 Hosprte,) Pnvc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 20 Mr. Fraas read Condition 8 from the BW3 Grill and Bar (Conditional Use 09 -067CM Record of Action, dated August 20, 1998: That exterior sound system be limited to soft music and that the sound be imperceptible from the north side of Perimeter Drive after i I p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and after midnight on Friday and Saturday, subject to restrictions of any future Dublin noise ordinance. Ms. Reiss asked how that was consistent with the existing PCD text that stated that there will be no noise, smoke odors, vibration, or other nuisances shall be permitted. Ms. Readier believed that the language in the text is noise to the point where it becomes a nuisance and soft music would not meet that requirement for nuisance. Mr. Zimmerman wanted them to have the same restriction as BW3. Mr. Gerber said it seemed, given the proximity of BW3 to this proposed facility, that it was consistent. He suggested the BW3 condition be Condition 4 on this application. Mr. Fraas agreed. Mr. Zimmerman made a motion to approve this conditional use application because the use is a conditional use of the zoning district, and the applicable development standards in the zoning ordinance are met, with four conditions: 1) That displaying signage on the proposed umbrellas for the outdoor dining area is prohibited, and arrangements for off - season storage of the umbrellas is required, subject to staff approval; 2) That all patio furniture coordinate with the architecture and color of the building, subject to staff approval; 3) That fencing and planting beds be compatible with the center; [amended below] and 4) That exterior sound system be limited to soft music and that the sound be imperceptible from the north side of Perimeter Drive after 11 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and midnight on Friday and Saturday, subject to restrictions of any future Dublin noise ordinance. Mr. Gerber noted that Condition 3 above was amended to read: That fencing match the BW3 fencing, and planting beds be compatible with the center. He seconded Mr. Zimmerman's motion with this amendment to Condition 3. Mr. Fraas agreed to the amended conditions as listed below: 1) That displaying signage on the proposed umbrellas for the outdoor dining area is prohibited and arrangements for the off - season storage of the umbrellas is required, subject to staff approval; 2) That all patio furniture coordinates with the architecture and color of the building, subject to staff approval; 3) That fencing match the BW3 fencing (6595 Perimeter Drive), and planting beds be compatible with the center; and 4) That exterior sound system be limited to soft music and that the sound be imperceptible from the north side of Perimeter Drive after 1 l p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and midnight on Friday and Saturday, be subject to restrictions of any future Dublin noise ordinance. g lF.(IOt 71PDl /FD P /CU Rezoning /Pretimmary Devetoprnent Pkue hlual Development PlardCondit!onal Use Kroger Fuel Statior 7100 1lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 21 The vote was as follows: Mr. Messineo, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) Ms. Boring referred to a portion of the text discussing noise, smoke, and odors. She asked if that would not pertain to odors from these restaurants. Ms. Readler said the odor would have to reach the level of a nuisance, which is something that would offend a reasonable person. 3. Revised Dev opment Plan 04 -029 — MAG Rolls yee Auto Dealer rp — 6335 Perimeter. oop Road Mr. Gerbe wore -in those who int ded to speak befo the Commission ' regards to this adminis tive case. J >e Adkins said this site ' located in west -c tral Dublin, just n of SR 161 and t of very - Muirfield Drive. he showed slides the site. The sit as frontage on f public rights -of -way: Perim er Loop, Venture D ' e, Perimeter Driv , and SR 161. Peri ter Center is located to the w t. The site is zone CD, Planned Co erce District in area J of the Perimeter Cente Ian. All adjacent perties are zoned D. The area be modified is at main entrance ci /oor Perimete oop Road. Proposed change are minor and inclu a pedestrian path catio o the doors and windo s on a north elevation. small retaining w wadd to the existing pond, d a c ple of trees will be elocated because the pe placement door will b closed except when vehicl are driven i nside t building Adkins s ' the applicant wo like to have t switch out a sec d window with the same t e of door if mane eying problems orth side of a building will be M§!Adkins said staff i recomml sted in the staff re rt, adding a 1) That vehicul display be pro /Thate ffapproval; 2ed lenses be 3posed mods at f the Cit ngint 4 plans submitt, of this on the proposed for any lighting on ins comply with if a second _hat signage be appr 6) That be replaced subjval; and � 7) That ilize a roclCth for is required, that is directi with six conditi6ns as be noted as suc n all plans, mi wat Regulations, to the 1j t to staff approval; /� in nature, subject tg/staff an inch - per -inch is more if they die years, suitable, subject Merber said this is a est to revise a pre usly approved d cause the type of us re and other gener development are r previously approved mposite plan remai yg valid. The previousl approval. elan in the PCD. _� 0 -00 i Z /PPP /FD A U Rezoning /Prehinnaiy Dcvelopment 'lan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use 10ogei Ric) Station /1001-lospit"A Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting Held December 13, Ordinance -99 - An Ordinance Provid' for a Change in Zoning for 7 Acres L to on the South Side of Shi -Rings Road, Approximately 0 Feet East Avery Road, from: PCD, P ned Commerce District, to: D, Planned C merce District. (Performan ilms, Lot 9, 6365 Rings Ro Be No. 99- Xme Applicant: Tara Gro , LTD, 6365 Shier -Rings Re , Dublin, Ohio 43016, eorge Lewis) rke stated this t land is currently zoned PCD f several commercial uses, ses and so imited retail. They want toe nd the existing business, and ot meet t side -yard requirements in the PCD text. They would like to re ce uire t to 25 fee[. This is ttte only ' e under consideration. The s' o acres located on the south ' e of Shier Rings and is most ) width eveloped. ing Commission recommen approval on November 4 . - three ns by a vote of 5 -0. hat landscape plan be ised to conform to Code, sub to staff approval; 2) That a revised site p , landscape plan, and zoning t_ I be submitted within two weeks and be acceptable staff; and 3) That evergre be added along the west elev "onto visually screen the metal siding, subject to aff approval. Vote on t Ordinance - Mr. Adamek, ye ayor Kransmber, yes; Mr. R e�Rt r, yes; Mrs. Wiring, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, s; Mr. Peterson, yes. Ordinance 124.99 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 1.526 Acres Located at the Southwest Corner of Perimeter Drive and Avery- Muirfield Drive, from: PCD, Planned Commerce District, to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Riverside Hospital PCD- Burger King - 6315 Perimeter Drive/File No. 99 100Z) (Applicant: Dublin Oaks Limited, Don Casto Organization, c/o Paul G. Lukeman, 209 East State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43229; Burger King Corporation, c/o Dick Sampson 200 East Chicago Avenue, Westmont, Illinois 60559;and Cowan and Associates, c/o Brian M. Edison, 438 East Wilson Bridge Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085.) Ms. Clarke stated this site is currently zoned PCD and consists of an out parcel located in front of the Avery Square shopping center. It is currently zoned for fast food restaurant, bank or other service uses. The proposal is to put a fast food restaurant with a drive- through on a site that is zoned for fast food. The issue is that they are not able to comply with the parking code requirements. The only revision to the text that is under consideration would permit a 4,400 square foot restaurant to be built with 53 parking spaces. There is also an agreement in place that 15 off -site parking spaces be secured to provide employee parking. Mayor Kranstuber asked how many parking spaces would actually be required under the Code, and if there will be a stacking issue in relation to parking. Ms. Clarke stated that Code requires 88 parking spaces. In terms of stacking, Planning Commission has reviewed this matter as part of the conditional use application. The McDonald's site across the street is much smaller than the site in question, and the Burger King site will have more stacking around the building than McDonald's. She added that the McDonald's plan also was recommended for disapproval, and came to Council on a request for an override vote. This proposal, however, has the endorsement of both staff and the Planning Commission. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes. Ordinance 3 -99 - An Ordinance to Ado the Annual Op4 Fiscal r Ending December 31, 2000 nd Declaring an E Mr. nsley stated that the changes e during the budget rev i orporated into the document be e Council tonight. Mr. Adamek thanked staff Council for their diligence in; is recommending approv . pratino Rudnpt for the I0 -00i N)P /PUIP /Cu Re2011mg /Preliminary Development P)an/ Sinai Dcvcfopmcnt Plan /Conditional Use I<roger PUcl Station 7100 Hospital Dnvc DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION November 4, 1999 CITI of ofIt1.IN Ofiw" d flatly 58WShWAPF10A OAk,"430161136 fh�MU: 6147614550 fac6147614566 WebsftC WewdNnakW The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 8. Rezoning Application "400Z - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea 81 - Burger King - 6315 Perimeter Drive Location: 1.526 acres located at the southwest comer of Perimeter Drive and Avery- Muirfield Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital plan). Request: Review and approval of a rezoning application by way of a revision to the development text for the Riverside Hospital PCD, under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: A new 4,450 square foot fast -food restaurant with drive -thru. Applicant/Owner: Dublin Oaks Limited, Don Casto Organization, c/o Paul G. Lukeman, 209 Fast State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43229; represented by Burger King Corporation, c/o Dick Sampson 200 East Chicago Avenue, Westmont, Illinois, 60559; and Cowan & Associates, c/o Brian M. Edison, 438 East Wilson Bridge Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085. MOTION: To approve this application with three conditions: I) That the text be revised, to permit a minimum of 53 parking spaces for Burger King, prior to scheduling the public hearing; 2) That 15 off -site parking spaces be maintained and that all employees park off - site; and 3) That the balance of the requirements be met in the development plan. VOTE: 5 -0. RESULT: This application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION 14 hn D. Talentino Planner § [F00 Z/PDk k Rezoning /Preliminary Devolopment Pkw/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use IS.troger Puei Station ?700 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 4, 1999 Page 17 7. Fi Plat 99 -097FP - Westbury, ton 4, Phase 2 Th' case was postponed due to the to hour. There was no disco, or vote. 8. Rezoning Application 99 -100Z - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea BI - Burger King - 6315 Perimeter Drive John Talentino said this is a rezoning application to revise the development text for this outparcel at Avery Square. The revision will reduce the parking requirement for a restaurant, similar to the request approved for Wendy's /Tim Horton. Mr. Talentino said the development plan and the conditional use application will be considered at a later date. The architecture and layout will not be approved tonight. He showed several slides. Mr. Talentino said Avery Square was approved in 1996, and Wendy's was approved in 1997. It included a reduction in the rear yard setback in favor of more greenspace along Avery- Muirfield Drive for both outparcels. He said shared parking with the center was approved for the Wendy's restaurant. The staff report shows a number of Dublin restaurants and their applicable parking ratios. He said the text is to be revised to require 53 parking spaces, and the Burger King representatives believe that is more than needed. He noted the Wendy's/Tim Hortons variance was larger, but no problems have been observed. Mr. Talentino said the hedge and pillar treatment, similar lighting, and the sidewalk will be continued. He showed proposed building elevation. w He said the shopping center has agreed to provide ten spaces to the Burger King site. He said the shopping center, including the 25 shared parking spaces and the future center expansions, will continue to meet Code. He said staff is comfortable with this proposal. He said staff is recommending approval subject to three conditions: 1) That the text be revised to permit a minimum of 53 parking spaces for Burger King prior to scheduling die public hearing; 2) That ten off -site parking spaces be maintained; and 3) That the balance of the requirements be met in the development plan. Mr. Talentino said the employees will park off -site, not the customers. Mr. Fishman said problems have been experienced elsewhere, and the employees should be required to park off - site. He said the center clearly has a parking surplus. Mr. Sprague said it is a safety issue. The Commissioners all agreed on this point. Mr. Banchefsky noted a shared parking agreement will be needed to address the parking shortfall. Dick Sampson of Burger King said normally, a restaurant needs 40 to 50 spaces. He said 53 spaces will be plenty. Kevin Horn of Burger King said the largest shift is 8 -12 employees. 10- 001.'X. /PXDP /PD P/C U Rexonmg /Preliminary Development Plan! Final Development Plan /CQY)dltlonal Use Kroger Fuel Statien 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS -- Dublin'City CouncilMeeting -- " - pa g- e 2 Meeting - - Councii Mr. nor thauked them for their civic i olvement. Mrs stated that: 1. Cardinal Health h indicated their desire for a more minent address for its new headquart . They will have a horseshoe dri which will serve the building and their n address will be 7000 Cardinal P e. He thanked Council for their leaders ' and help in resolving this issue. 2. Th aving work at the intersection of antz and 161 is nearly complete ' he training work of curbing the are here the utility poles were rem ed is underway, and the last item to completed is the installation of traffic signals at Frantz Road and etro Place South. Those will be ' stalled within two months. Ms- Xiseful 1. A ran AA +was received by the C�or upcoming bo nd issue. Sat this will result in a mo interest rate. 2. Trtment software conv ion which has been in process r t he emented on Octo I and 2. The Department is no ear 2000 compliant. M Lenz announced that he me n Friday with the general contra r, architect and roofing contractor regardin e Recreation Center roof issue, there is now an agreement in principle t ompletely pay for the re -roofin cessary at the Re Center. The cost will be spli ong them, and the City will no ave to pay for the repairs. Mayor stuber stated that, unless there i objection, he will move Resol 'on 59 -98 up on a agenda. R 0lution 59 -98 - A Resolution A orizing the City Manager to er into a Non - inding Agreement with the F klin County Auditor (CARD for the Purpose of Facilitating the Exchange o nformation. (Introduction and ublic Hearing) Mayor IGanstube, introd d the resolution. Mr. Helwig noted tha e City has been asked to formal'- an agreement with the Auditor's office fo e exchange of GIS informatio , attklin County Auditor stated tha is office has worked to establist agree" is with many of the jurisdictions ound Franklin County over the st year. Th urpose is to formalize the arran , ent relative to the exchange of a to facilitate N/' t e maintenance of the GIS datab . The GIS system is a great com nity resource to help cities and otherjurisdictio around the county to build a be r database and to streamline services to citiz s. The reciprocal information w' work well for the City of Dublin in that Dublin w' continue to receive quarterly u tes on CD root of Franklin County's database ' out charge, but in exchange, Fr lin County wants to receive updates from D m given all the growth and de ve pment in the northwestern part he - county. All this information helps the Audi s Office to better determine the it market v e of all of the real estate in Fra In County. The next phase of t effort o will an Internet web site. He hopes t thieve over the next year or so ystem which „ c electronically receive updates a ey are installed in the local are . This will avoid c- the reproduction of data and me se efficiency. o � o Mayor Kranstuber congr lated Mr. Testa on the success f Implementation of the r_ innovative GIS syste in Franklin County. t-' " ° - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor nsmber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; s. C Boring, yes; . Peterson, yes; Ms. Hide Pittalug yes. " -2 1 , S ECOND RFADINQ URI.IC HFARJ1M - ORDINANf U 'J c R & i. o Ordinance No. 30 -98 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 25.346; _c Acres Located on the North Side of Perimeter Loop Road, Approximately 250 Feet c RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Meeting Held nemh�� to ioog 19_ West of Avery- Muirfield Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District, to: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital PCD- Subarea B Signage- 6335- 7100 Perimeter Loop Road) (Applicant: Dublin Oaks Limited, 209 East State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215) Ms. Clarke stated that this item involves signage for the shopping center known as Avery Square. The shopping center consists of about 25 acres. She showed slides of the Center and pointed out three specific areas where there is a height issue resulting from the architecture of the building. The Kroger sign was put in place under a temporary permit in the summer of 1997. The sign is 109 square feet, and the maximum under Dublin's Code is 80 square feet. A condition attached to the temporary permit was that the applicant come back before Council to complete the paper work necessary for this signage. She then showed slides of the various signs in the Center. She noted that the previously approved color palette for the Center did not provide a cream color, so that was added as it contrasts well with the red brick in the Center. Some additional housekeeping changes were made to the zoning text, and those are highlighted in the new text. The maps indicate the specific areas where the signage will be permissible. With approval from Council, the updated signage package will now be part of the zoning document. Mr. Reiner asked if staff is in full support of this text change. Ms. Clarke responded that they are. Mrs. Boring asked how this impacts the overall balance in terms of signage allowed at Perimeter Center across the street? Ms. Clarke responded that the Kroger and the Big Bear signs are exactly the same square footage. While there are individual differences in the signage identification of tenants, both centers have a subdued presentation of signage in general. Charles Fraas, 209 F Slate Street representing the applicant, stated that he will respond to any questions. Votr nn [be QEdf� - Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Ordinance No 13 -98 - An Ordinance from Jero Township, Union County /stub .) moved to adjourn t em n seconded the mot the Annexation of 56 +/- Acres of Dublin. (ColumhwlRttitd., session at 7:45 p.rYfo discuss land Vote on the motion - Mrs. B ng, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, ; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes. Mayor Iranstuber onvened Xirector, .m. Mr. Helwig ted that present tter are Bill AdXr t Ben Hale mith & Hale; and Lnt Director, D Servic , Metro Parks. Th have a very exciting annoe in keeping wi e new Metro Park. Mr. Peck exp ressed appr iation for the partnership they ave entered into with the City of Dublin, Jerome To nship, and Union County Co issioners to develop the Wort est park. The propert hich is part of this annexatio is just outside the target area the park. They ha reached an agreement with Schottenstein Home acrZd cc of $12,000 per acre - a ve attractive price in this n 10- 0017. /PDI, /FDP /CU ve bout the northwest park a this is a good opportunity tc Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final sitions. They are hop I o(£u rther acquisitions yet t Dcvelopnicnt Plan /Conditional Use pporting the park d' rict in this endeavor. Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive CITY OF DUBLIN WVWWofmown, 50005hw -rj* Rood DY6in, Ohio 13016-1736 lhar/IDO: 614-7614550 Fox 6141614566 Yhh58e wwwhAW.Aw DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION August 20, 1998 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Rezoning Application 98-MZ - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through 7100 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 25.346 acres located on the north side of Perimeter Loop Road, approximately 370 feet west of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development text under the provisions of Section 153.058 regarding signage. Proposed Use: A sign package for the retail center including a 109 square foot, internally illuminated wail sign for the anchor tenant and other tenant signs. Applicant: Frank S. Bensen III, Manager, Dublin Oaks Limited, 209 Fast State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43229; represented by Dana G. Rinehart, attorney, 395 East Broad Street, Suite 330, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with f = conditions: 1) That all signs in Subarea B be of the same design, materials, and colors as shown in the appropriate exhibits, including maximum sign heights and projecting sign color; 2) That a maximum of seven colors be on the approved sign color palette, subject to staff approval; 3) That the text be revised and approved by staff prior to being scheduled on City Council agenda; and 4) That the text be revised to include the following four changes from the draft dated August 14, 1998: Page 2, Section 3.a: "All signage shall conform to Dublin Sign Code Chapter 1189 except as provided for by this text for Subarea B, and exopt as provided for in the Signage Criteria and approved as nary_ of the Development Plan " R 0 -00 E Z /IP0 P /F!)P /CkJ N.ezonmg /Preliminary Developrcient Plan; hnai Development Plan /Conditional Use Page I of 2 Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION August 20, 1998 3. Rezoning Application 98 -024Z - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through 7100 Perimeter Loop Road (Continued) Page 3, Section 3.i.: "No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall, or fence except as provided herein or as permitted a s e ant's main identification sign under pmgmph B.2. of the "Signage and yr hies" section of "Subarea 13 Retail Ce nter" herein No wall murals shall be allowed." Page 13, Section A - "Signage and Graphics" Delete the sentence following "Main Identification Signs ". 432ere shall be ni iden6fieafien sigm for the shopping eenter on Perimeter Loop Road tmd Perimetet Drive. Page 13, Section A.1: "A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 15 feet . in height on Perimeter 1 DW Road 1010 feet on Perimeter Drive and 19 feet in width, with a maximum each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 66 square feet per sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail tenant signage materials and colors. Permitted location for each main identification W at the eastern Perimeter Loop Road entrance to the center and 121 at the western Perimeter Drive customer entrance." * Charles Fraas, Don Casto Organization, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIF hn D. Talentino Planner 6..W)1Z/P0P /FDP? /CU R.ecomrlg /Preliminary Development Plan/ .Final Development Plan /Condtoonul Use Page 2 of 2 Kroger Fuel stadoa "'100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 9 10) : Tbat the be revised to incorporate e Avery Road rig tanis alignment study, t an easement and in prior to constructi consistent with the MS vay dedication plat Mr. McCash seconded, d a vote was as follows: Fishman, yes; Mr. Spr e, yes;, Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. ider, yes, Mr. McCash, ;and Mr. Eastep, yes. ( proved 6 -0.) 3. Rezoning-Application 98-024Z - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through 7100 Perimeter Loop Road John Talentino presented this revised development text regarding signage. He said Ford/Berry Architects submitted it at the July meeting and staff has reviewed it. The main issues were the existing Kroger sign, the permitted number and locations of project identity signs, locations of the tenant signs that will exceed 15 feet, awning and projecting sign restrictions, and sign colors. Mr. Talentino showed slides. Mr. Talentino said the Kroger sign is 109 square feet, mounted at 22 feet high. However, the existing text only permits 80 square feet at a 15 foot height. The Kroger sign was granted a temporary permit, with the agreement that the applicant pursue a text revision. Also included in the text are projecting signs for tenants located under the covered walkway and recessed off the street. The Drug Emporium sign is to be mounted on the brick building exterior, and the existing color palette provides very little contrast. A new beige color (Sherwin Williams Palais White SW- 2429) is added to solve this, and an existing brown (Martin - Senour: William Finnie House Brown W85 -0225) is being deleted from the color palette. He said this brown color has not been used by any of the center's tenants to date, and so there should be no adverse affect from removing it. Mr. Talentino said the intent is to provide equivalent treatment for Avery Square and Perimeter Center. They have similar commitments, restrictions, and sign packages. Staff has worked with the applicant on the proposed text revisions. There is agreement on the clarifications included in the proposed development text. Several sign criteria of the approved development plan are being retained. They could be changed by approval of a revised development plan, rather than a rezoning. Mr. Talentino said wall murals will continue to be prohibited. He said there could be two development identification signs for the shopping center, the locations for which are specified in the text. They are not required. Staff recommends approval with three conditions: 1) That all signs in Subarea B be of the same design, materials, and colors as shown in the appropriate exhibits, including maximum sign heights and projecting sign color; 2) That a maximum of seven colors be on the approved sign color palette, subject to staff approval; and 3) That the text be revised and approved by staff prior to being scheduled on City Council agenda. Mr. McCash questioned the permissible sign locations for Wendy's restaurant. The text permits outparcel uses to have a sign facing Avery and one facing "the internal access road on the west side." Its sign faces Avery- Muirfield and Perimeter Loop, not the accPQz .1. iup hrh; p d_,.ho �• ^ - St649Utk.lEPJFIM N)h°/ u �3.czon;ngik'rciirainary Dcvcloprocnt Plan- Flial otvclopment Plan /Conditional Use Kreger f uel nation 'l(b 11M Di'wc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 10 He wanted this researched and for the text to accurately reflect the permissible sign locations. Mark Ford, Ford/Berry Architects, suggested that originally, there was no service road shown behind the outlots on the approved plan. He thought that reference was really to Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Mr. McCash noted that text page 13, A2, addresses the proportion of the sign base to sign face. The width in section Al should be limited to 15 feet. Mr. Talentino said this allows flexibility for a future sign request through a revised development plan. The intent is to keep both centers equivalent. Mr. McCash suggested referencing the sign elevation that was submitted. Regarding the background color for projecting signs, Mr. Talentino said these pieces will all match for each tenant, but not all tenants will use the same color. All awnings have white stripes with one of several pre - approved colors as the background. Mr. McCash said that striped awnings make awning signs unlikely, because they would be illegible. On page 16, the setbacks are being changed for Subarea B -1 but not for B -2. This reflects the setbacks for the Wendy's site. The building area was shifted westward (increasing the right -of- way and front setback on Avery- Muirfield Drive, and decreasing the rear setback behind the outparcels). Mr. McCash suggested applying this to Subarea B -2 as well. Mr. McCash suggested attaching the signage criteria from the approved development plan as an exhibit because it would consolidate the sign information. The applicant wants to retain the right to request signage changes over time without having to rezone the site. Mr. Talentino said this document should not be binding, but could be attached as an example. He said it is very detailed, including such things as letter height. Charlie Fraas, Don Casto Organization, requested that the signage criteria remain separate because it contains detailed information. Currently, it could be changed by getting a development plan amendment through the Planning Commission. He does not want to be required to undergo a rezoning, which is a very lengthy and complex process, due to minor signage changes. He said these details are not included in the text for Perimeter Center. Regarding equivalency of the permissible identification signs for the two shopping centers, Mr. Talentino said staff consulted the Law Director. Staff believes Perimeter Center would be entitled to a center identification sign facing Avery- Muirfield Drive. The site for the identification sign was originally identified in the text and plan, and that site has subsequently been developed with the McDonald's restaurant. The original plan recognized it as an outparcel of Perimeter Center. Therefore, staff believes the circumstances and sign rights are unchanged. Mr. Sprague understood from his discussion with the Law Director that such a sign was unlikely. It would require agreement by McDonald's, and it might interfere with their own sign. Mr. Talentino said the possibility remains. Mr. McCash believes the center's developer negated this location for its sign when the outparcel was sold to McDonald's. It would now be an off -site, non- permiecih1^ nrnnhir Thprp is nn formal legal opinion. Such a sign would also look bad, 10- 00 17rn1) 1'/FDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Ki oger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 11 Bridget Kahle said this will be fully researched if, and when, a sign permit is filed. J Mr. Fishman wanted a mechanism that would assure that a Perimeter Center sign would never be installed on Avery- Muirfield Drive. Mr. McCash said City Council has the power to eliminate it by initiating such a rezoning, but he thought that was not likely to happen at the present time. Mr. Talentino said the 15 -foot height is measured from finished grade minus mounding to the top of the sign. Mr. Lecklider noted the outparcels were substantially regraded and are now at a higher elevation than Avery- Muirfield Drive. Mr. Fraas said the rear setback issue was approved by Council for Wendy's, but the text did not reflect the change. Subarea B -2 is not involved because it is owned by Riverside Hospital and is not a party to this rezoning. Subarea B -I includes both shopping center outparcels. Mr. McCash asked about the text (Al and A2), the 19 -foot width, and the area of the sign base. He asked if pillars created a problem and should be included in the exhibits. Mr. Fraas said the signage criteria was approved by the Planning Commission, and the base shown is 15 feet or less. He said no changes from the approval are being requested. The revised text accommodates all of the requested signage. Mr. Fraas said this originated with the 109 square foot Kroger sign. Staff then requested several accompanying modifications through the negotiating process. The new, lighter sign color will be compatible with the trim on the buildings. Mr. Fishman thought the new color should not be a bright white color. Mr. Talentino said Drug Emporium had requested alternate colors for its sign because of the lack of contrast with the brick background. Staff thought it was prudent to include all sign issues in one application for the center. Staff finds the proposed color to be acceptable. Mr. Fishman recalled the discussion about the wet basin and saving the landmark tree. He said the pond area is unattractive and not maintained. The pond needs an aerator and a proper stone edge to make it an attractive feature. Mr. Fraas said the developer did everything required at the development plan. He thought a grass edge was preferred. The water level is low due to a lack of rainfall. The pond is not a germane issue, and he cannot make a commitment to redo the pond. Mr. Fraas agreed to take care of the algae and mowing necessary. Mr. Fraas said the orientation of the Perimeter Loop Road sign is not decided, but the location is shown. Signage on Avery- Muirfield Drive, although disapproved by Council, would be more important to the developer. This sign on Perimeter Loop Road may not be installed for some time. Mr. Lecklider said the location has potential for sign clutter. On Perimeter Drive, at the northeast corner of the site, the plan indicated a 50 square foot sign only six feet in height. Mark Ford said these dimensions related to the original sign proposal that incorporated stone piers. In discussing the equivalency issues with staff regarding Perimeter Center, a second sign location was determined. Mr. Fraas was unsure if the second identification sign will be installed. He t0- 001Z /A• DP /P'nP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Develoon'ienr Plan/Condmonol Usc i<rogcr Fuei Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -August 20, 1998 Page 12 believes this makes both sides of the street more equal. Some of these are advantages for the site, �.✓ and some are disadvantages. He thinks the proposed text is fair for both centers. Mr. Lecklider said great effort was applied in saving the historic oak tree, and that placement of a 15 -foot tall sign in front of it seemed inappropriate. He was concerned about the potential actions of future owners of the center. Mr. Fraas said every detail of the center was thoroughly discussed prior to approval of the development plan three years ago. Mr. Lecklider noted that at a previous meeting, several citizens spoke about this area being a gateway to the northern residential areas. Mr. Fishman preferred that the second sign be removed from the text if possible. Mr. McCash said in general, he dislikes signs that are 15 feet tall. However, in special cases, they may be okay. This was previously approved. He said the whole center seems to face the wrong direction. The sign location on Perimeter Drive is more appropriate due to the importance of that road. He does not think the sign will detract from the historic oak tree. Mr. Sprague said size is an important factor in signage. He would prefer to tighten up the plan. The sign mass seems too large for the location. The grades were built up. He preferred to resolve VO the issue by reducing the potential sign size, but he supported the overall proposal. Mr. Peplow agreed with Mr. Sprague. He thanked Mr. McCash for his thorough text review. Mr. Eastep said most residents want to minimize the commercial look of roads in Dublin. He had concern with the magnitude of the sign. He said the Hilton Head area presents a good example of appropriate signage. Signs there are lower than 15 feet, and their businesses are doing well. He preferred lower signage, but did not want to override the previous approvals. Mr. Lecklider appreciated the efforts of all involved. The current text permits one project identity sign, and the proposal is for two signs. He thinks the sign on Perimeter Drive should be lower. He thought the size and height proposed here indicated more than mere "identification." Mr. Fraas suggested a sign height limit on Perimeter Drive of 12 feet. Mr. Lecklider appreciated the offer, but it was still too tall. Mr. Fraas said the height of the sign will be determined based on the setback from the roadway. Mr. Fraas then offered a 10 -foot sign height limit. Mr. Lecklider thought six to eight feet would be more appropriate. Mr. Sprague thought the interpretation of the term "equity" was too narrow. He thought there should be "comparability" between the two centers, which does not include matching every detail. He could support the compromise of ten feet for the sign height offered by Mr. Frans. f O -oo s zaPD P /FDP /ta; Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final ): mdopment PlanK'onditional Use Kroger Fnei Station 7 100 Hospital Drive. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 13 Mr. Fraas said the Avery Square sign is larger than Perimeter Center's sign, but it is not on Avery- Muirfield Drive. He said this is a property rights issue, and this text is fair to both centers. Mr. Fishman said this a gateway location for Dublin. The Don Casto Organization has done a great job here, but this center could be sold in the future. He also thought a compromise was in order. Mr. Lecklider said all issues are subject to change. He recalled a controversy over signs for the BP station. The applicant was adamant about the exact green and yellow colors and the BP "shield." That corporation was sold, and the signs will no doubt change now. This developer has done a great job, but his concern is for the future. Mr. McCash said City Council is proposing some Sign Code changes. He thought there should be a relatively even playing field, but there will never be exact equality. Formerly, the Commission approved a 15 -foot tall sign. He believes the text presents a reasonable compromise. Mr. Fishman agreed to the ten -foot height as offered by the applicant for the sign on Perimeter Drive. Mr. Peplow agreed as well. Mr. Fraas accepted all of the conditions. Mr. McCash moved for approval of the revised development text for signage with four conditions: 1) That all signs in Subarea B be of the same design, materials, and colors as shown in the appropriate exhibits, including maximum sign heights and projecting sign color; 2) That a maximum of seven colors be on the approved sign color palette, subject to staff approval; 3) That the text be revised and approved by staff prior to being scheduled on City Council agenda; and 4) That the text be revised to include the following four changes from the draft dated August 14, 1998: Page 2, Section 3.a: "All signage shall conform to Dublin Sign Code Chapter 1189 except as provided by this text for Subarea B, and exce as provided for in the Signa,ge Criteria and approved as part of the Development Plan. Page 3, Section 3.i: "No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall, or fence except as provided herein or as permitted as tenant's main identification sign under paragraph B.2. of the "Sign?age and . hies" section of "Subarea B - Retail Center" herein No wall murals shall he allowe Page 13, Section A - "Signage and Graphics" Delete the sentence following "Main Identification Signs ". q%ere shall be main identifieation signs for the shopping eenter a Perimeter 6eep Road mid Pei imeter Drive. Page 13, Section A.1: "A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 15 feet in height on Perimeter Lunn Road and 10 feet in height onht onPer Drive- and 19 feet in width, with a maximum each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 66 square feet per sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail tenant signage materials and colors. Permitted location for each main identification sign: ULat d d(i..t70WF'DP /FnK' /its Rezo) I ing /Prehrnmtuy Urvelopment, Plan/ Final Develoornnnl Plan /cond(bonal Usc Klo,gcn Fuc! swilon "� oo 110spital Dnvm Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - August 20, 1998 Page 14 71 entrance to the center and one sueh sign will be loeated Q at the western Perimeter Drive customer entrance. " Mr. Fishman seconded, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. McCash, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) 4. Rezo ' g Application 98 -053 - Tuttle CZ ed estead Village - 4 Tuttle Cr Boulevard The plicant requested by le r that this applicat until the Se mber 3, 1998 eeting. Notices were se to property owners. iscussion vote taken. 5. Developm lam 98-054DP - Tossing - Homestead - 4900 Tuttle C ing Boulev The app ' t requested by letter at this application be p tponed until the Septe r 3, 1998 meet' g. Notices were sent t roperty owners. Ther as no discussion or v e taken. 6. Conditional U 8 -067CU - Riverside ospital PCD, Sub - BW -3 Grill and - 6595 P ' er Loop Road Chris Her said this is a request an outdoor service at at an existing restaur within the Ave quare shopping center. t is contained in Sub B of the Riverside H pital PCD, and o oor seating is a condit' nal use under the deve pment text. An outd r concrete pad ne to the building will be to seat 48 people. A s will be from inside a restaurant. The ea is surrounded by a rought iron fence with o exit -only gates. He presented sev5W slides of the area. said there The storefron ystem on this tenant spa6e has a dark appe match the t of the center. An 8 percent opacity blind causes a difference in ap Staff recommends m9d centet maintains a com ten onearance. wiJi'be gooseneck light fix es. from the exterior and not been instal the ' terior that ig the storefront s t the entire He said the shopping,/center will occupy n y 225,000 square fee hen fully construe Approximately 47, square feet remain to built, including an ex ion of the grocery re. This outdoor io will add 2,000 sq a feet to the 7,000 s e foot restaurant. a patio requires 1 dditional parking spa and the center curr y has eight spaces er the full require nt. When the future opping center expans' ns occur, there will a three -space sho ll. That will have be alleviated at that a by adding parki restriping, etc. Trendy, based on squ footage, the shoppin enter exceeds the re ' ed parking. 0 Umbrellas with as ' fabric similar to advertising. a tables will be permar 10-09RVPOP /MP /CU lnings will be I l2czomng /.Preliminary Development Plan/ Final fixed. The ch 1)E'velopmene Plan /Conditional Use t< er Fuel Swim '7100 Hosoju)) D;Ive %rrY OF DUBLIN xvmn of �� Ak Olio 43016.1136 s/ WA14- 7045SO I= 614.7616566 iskwaAA1P.o vs DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION July 9 1998 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning Application 98 MZ - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through1100 Perimeter. Loop Road Location. 25.346 acres located on the north side of Perimeter Loop Road, approximately 370 feet west of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development text under the provisions of Section 153.058 regarding signage. Proposed Use: A sign package for the retail center including a 109 square foot, internally illuminated wall sign for the anchor tenant and other tenant signs. Applicant: Dublin .Oaks Limited, c /o. Frank S. Bensen III, Manager, .209 East State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43229; represented by Dana G. Rinehart, attorney, 395 East Broad Street, Suite 330, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To table this rezoning application. VOTE: 4 -3. RESULT: After much discussion, this application was tabled until a later date to allow the Commissioners and staff to further review the signage issues presented in the memorandum from Mark Ford, Ford -Beery Architects, Inc., dated July 8, 1998 and distributed at the meeting. STAFF CERTIFICATION .VWh:a klin D. Talentino Planner 10 -001 Z /PbP /FDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Developinrnt Plan/ 1-'inal Development plan /Conditional t Kroger Fuel stalion 7 100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 9, 1998 Page 2 F1 Mr. page The Sprague a motion to a vote was as !lows: Mr. Mr. Fishman, abstain; Mr made A motion to changing the i r was as fol was Mr the June44. 1998 meetin p, yes; Mr Harian, yes; ;ash, yes; d Mr. Sprag rve the June . 1998 me es fro Lecklid Mr Mr. H an,, yes; sh, yes; IVr. Eastep, 3 to "Mr. Mr. lutes; Mr. ACash seconded. Lecklider, y , Mr. Peplow, es. (Approv 6-0-1) minutes with ections to LAu r"; Mr. Eas seconded. Mr. Peplow, es; Mr. yes. (Approv 5-0-2) Mr. announced *t the Indiai edge rezoning aklication (97-151P has been until the J ly 16 meeting. He also no there is an 11:09 p.m. meeting ut-off rule. 1. Rezoning Application 98 -024Z -Revised Development Text -Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B, Signage - 6335 -7100 Perimeter Loop Road John Talentino presented this revised development text regarding signage for Avery Square. The composite plan was approved in 1989, and the development plan for the shopping center was approved in 1996. In July 1997, the Kroger sign was installed which is 109 square feet in area (29 square feet too large) under a temporary sign permit. It was understood that an approved text revision is needed before the sign can be permanent. Staff wants to keep the signage equal on both sides of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Mr. Talentino showed various slides. The proposed text would legalize the Kroger sign and allow two shopping center signs; at the Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive entrances. The existing text allows only one entrance sign, but two would conform with the Perimeter Center text. Sign colors have been revised to replace brown with an ivory shade, providing a better contrast with the background. All signs will be externally illuminated by gooseneck fixtures except the Big Bear sign. There will be pedestrian- oriented signs with similar size, standard lettering, and colors, as specified in the text. Mr. Talentino said the proposed revisions create comparable treatment for the two competing centers on Avery- Muirfield Drive. The text providesfor the.same size .signage for Kroger and Big Bear and similar treatment for all tenants. Staff is recommending approval of the revised development text with following conditions: 1) That all signs in Subarea B be of the same design, materials, and colors as shown in the appropriate exhibits, including maximum sign heights and projecting sign color; 2) That a maximum of seven colors be on the approved sign color palette, subject to staff approval; and 3) That the text be revised and approved by staff prior to being scheduled on City Council agenda. Mr. Talentino said a memorandum from Dublin Oaks Limited recently arrived requesting revisions. Staff has not had an opportunity to review the comments fully. [Memorandum copies were distributed.] 10-00 1 2 /PpN'lXF Y06' /CEJ Rezoning /Prohminary Development Plan/ hnal Development Plan /Conditional Usr, Kroger Fuel Station 7)00 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 9, 1998 Page 3 George Peplow asked about store fronts for which signs higher than 15 feet are requested. These were shown in the slides, and 15 feet falls in the middle of some of the taller windows. Mr. Peplow noted the Kroger sign was inadvertently installed to match the size of the Big Bear sign. Jim Sprague asked if the Perimeter Center or Avery Square PCD text was adopted first. Bobbie Clarke said they were discussed together at several meetings in 1989. The Perimeter Center text was first by a month or two and assumed the retail center would be an upscale internal retail mall. A few years. later that. text was revised to permit an architecturally coordinated strip center. Vn Sprag=asked about*,the Kroger.-sign. Mr. Talentino said that.+c mntly;- the- permitted size is 80 squamfeet, and:the:existing sign is 109: square, feet. The.height is 22 feet,. and, the current text only permits 15: feet. Mr.. Sprague thought it should .be explained to who is involved in the text revision._ :It:seems that there is one applicant with several. involved parties. Mr. Fishman said the Big Bear landscaping seems :much heavier- than •Kroger's. He wondered if it exceeds the Code. Ms. Clarke -said the Perimeter ...Center.dandscaping:is a few, years older, but she thought both centers meet Code without exceeding it, except for entry features, etc. Both have big: parking lots, therefore, to meet the Code will require many trees. Mr. Fishman asked if both parking lots have the.same amount of grass around them. Big Bear appears to.have more greenspace. Mary Newcomb said much effort was taken at here to get the parking lot trees and the area consistent with the Perimeter Center overall greenspace. Mr. Talentino said a sign height of 15 feet refers to the top of the sign. Mr. Harian asked what the new sign height will be for the nonconforming areas. Mr. Talentino said there are elevations attached to the text revision showing these areas individually. Kroger's will be 22 feet high. Tom McCash asked about entry feature signs. Previously there was only one sign approved at the Perimeter Loop entrance. Mr. Talentino agreed. Mr. McCash said Council turned down a sign along Avery- Muirfield Drive due to size. Now two sign locations are requested. Mr. McCash asked how many tenants at Perimeter Center use awning signs. Ms. Clarke said the awning signs are pedestrian- oriented; as part of the architectural package, but .noneare n: use.. Staff supports this type of subdued on -site identification for tenants. This is not,the same as= having several illuminated sign boxes, although several signs:per tenant:are:•permitted. She said- awnings with tenant messages •of some type were uses historically installed on older buildings. Mr. Talentino said the current text for Avery Square allows one shopping center sign, and the Perimeter text permits two such signs. Mr.: Lecklider asked if-Perimeter Center could install a shopping center sign on Avery- Muirfield Drive. Mr. McCash said this would be -prohibited as an off- -site graphic sign. Mitch Banchefsky said such a sign was always contemplated, and he would like an opportunity to review the text. He does not want to leave the Commission with the impression that no such sign is possible. Dana G. Rinehart, attorney for Kroger, said their sign is six inches higher than allowed by the zoning text. He said this was an inadvertent mistake, but the Kroger sign is smaller than the Big 40 Bear sign. The sign was ordered a few days before the store opened, and when it was discovered 1@-OO d Z /PDP /VD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development flan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital 1. nve Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 9, 1998 Page 4 it was slightly larger than permitted, they called the City, asking for direction. They were allowed to go ahead with the opening and put the sign up with the understanding that they would return to the Commission for revision of the zoning text. Kroger apologizes for the size error and would like to keep the current sign. Charlie Fraas, Don Casto Organization, also represented the applicant. After receiving the staff report, they realized that staff bad initiated certain changes which benefit the developer, but were not requested by the applicant. The attempt to duplicate the Perimeter Center text was initiated bys staff:: The-memorandum distributed xeequests minor. changes , >regatdingthe - monument ;sign. " Their biggest concern was that their signage rights would be given up to achieve, equality with Perimeter Center signage. He said the Casto Organization knew Kroger would nee& to pursue a rezoning:for a larger sign, and they support.that effort. .He. said: staff. support.has.been.great. He would like the clarification in the memorandum from Mark Ford -added Ito, the record. [Memorandum attached to minutes.] Mr. Fraas said the new text refers to one monument sign in one place, and a second reference is made later to two signs. The text should be consistent. They did not request awning signs but will accept awning.signs as:anoption., They:would:like.the "blade ". signs to be :optional because tenants are responsible for their own signage. They have no problem with the ivory color chosen. They, would, like Section F if okayed by Kroger. In section G, they believe the sign height should be 20 feet, not 18 feet at future anchor A. Section H is a non -issue and clarifies a text inconsistency. He wanted existing language not incorporated as part of the zoning text, dealing with signage criteria, to remain as part of the final development plan. Mr. Fraas said the other issues will clean up the record, including the recent setback change. Their biggest issue is the monument sign. They will be happy to have this decided at a future point. They would like the second shopping center sign to be located at the western customer entrance, not the western service drive. Mr. Fraas suggested that the Ford Beery report could be incorporated into the text. Roger Eastep asked about timing. Ms. Clarke said this is not delaying anything at the shopping center. George Peplow said that the memorandum makes referencm.to a text;notbefore.the Commission. Mr. Peplow. wanted %assurance no be taken against Kroger. Ms. Clarke said the Kroger temporary sign permit required they to follow up with a text revision. She said the sign will stay in place until the disposition of the rezoning paperwork. Warren Fishman suggested that Kroger be permitted to have its sign; that future monument signs be permitted, (but not on Avery- Muirfield Drive); and that the awning sign language be eliminated. Mr. Harian agreed. Mr. Fraas said his center has been pressured to do things following the Perimeter Center pattern. He wanted the same rights to awning signs, if possible. Tom McCash noted the retail center is Subarea B. Mary Newcomb said Subareas B -1 and B -2 are outparcels along Avery- Muirfield Drive. Mr. McCash said Item IA of the Ford Beery memo 10 that item H in the Ford letter needs to changed to allow two signs in Subar^- u tip n,,,ia cnnnnrt to- ootrirI)PI F RO/Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 9, 1998 Page 5 awning signs consistent with Perimeter Center. The blade signs could be optional. He wanted the paint colors listed in the text also consistent with the Perimeter Center text. He supports the Kroger sign. The additional sign height at the noted location will be architecturally integrated into the building. Mr. McCash said 18 or 20 feet high will be fine. Item B is the biggest problem. Mr. Fraas said there is some compromise here, and they will go through a two step process if necessary. Tim L:ecklider was not comfortable voting tonight. He would like.an answer abourthe ability of P.erimeterC z- brine .asignon.Avery- Mubfield•Drive. Ho- vanted;statfftoieviewdkTeamt memorandum- fon.eDnsistency -with Perimeter Center. Sign height maybe an issue near the historic tree.: He preferred °tabling: _Mr. L.ecklider asked %if would for Kroger. .Mr. Rinehart-.saidno, unless the signmill be removed. Mr..Rinehart:suggested there were no issues with the . Kroger, - proposal, and- he. did not think he= needed-to:Teappear. Mr. McCash would rather act on this case tonight. James Renard, vice president of the Lowell Trace Civic Association, said both centers are very nice and.professionally done, but any. type of monument or identification sign that can be observed from the gateway on Avery- Muirfreld.Drive would be strongly opposed. Mr.. Lecklider asked for a straw vote on the issue of tabling. Messrs. Peplow, Eastep, Sprague, and L.ecklider favored tabling. Messrs. Harian, Fishman, and Mr. McCash favored voting. Mr. Eastep made a motion to table this rezoning application. Mr. Peplow seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Harian, no; Mr. L.ecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Fishman, no; Mr. McCash, no; Mr. Peplow, yes; and Mr. Eastep, yes. (Approved 4 -3.) 2. Three E on - Plat 98 -07 - Westbury uzanne Wing ld presented this time extension or the Westb preliminary pl t, containing 44 acres. The l 1,atxeswithin in County ere rewned in une:1995;;and. a 23 acres Union County w rezoned in 1996. The. reliminary.:plat or :Ii 1l a res , approved b City Council in mber of 1 A subsequ minoc:revision:, :the plat was by City. il in January -1 The- plat for @te: acr es; in tJni County approved by We ommission, tuber 1995 by Council, ch 1996. Ms. Wingenfield:saW the Code states: t a- prelim' plat expires o years after uncil app unless the ion grants extension. Al ough the plat is ffrcially expir this is a equest for a extension. Th Commission either appro e. or disapprov the extetas but this is not a lit amendment She showed se eras slides of th area. The pr rty contai 144 acres in F in and Unio counties. Th Edwards pro (an acre) is t includ in the Westbury ivision. The ds house w' have access from new subdivisi street. u [G -60 a � /PPJ7H /9� KDP /C; F; Rezoning /Preliminary Deveiopm nt Pfan/ Final Develo_ument Plan /Conditional Use, I<_rogcr FUCK Station 7106 Nosuita! Drive TY OF DUBLIN �QAir�ptmd t{gi8'l3014t236 V /141614550 Fc 6147616566 iNKmAkhAw DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 7, 1998 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning- Application 98 -0242 - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through 7100 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 25.346 acres located on the north side of Perimeter Loop Road, approximately 370 feet west of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development text under the provisions of Section 153.058 regarding signage. ..Proposed: Use: A signpackage for the retail center including a 109 square foot, internally illuminated wall sign for the anchor tenant and other tenant signs. Applicant/Owner: Dublin Oaks Limited, c/o Frank S. Bensen III, Manager, 209 Fast State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43229; represented by Dana G. Rinehart, attorney, 395 East Broad Street, Suite 330, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: John D. Talentino, Planner.* MOTION: To table this application as requested by the Law Director. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This application was tabled for 30 days. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director X 0 -00 t Z /1'DP /FDP /CU Rczoning /1'rclimin:uy Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Dive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 7, 1998 Page 2 Ms. Claz said the Commission had r ived copies of a letter fro rry Frimerman, Chair the A tectural Review Board. I scussed temporary A -franc tgnage in Old Dublin. S said t to had been referred to e Law Director's office f preparation of an ordin Ms. Clarke said Coun ' was also considering an or ' an regarding "Big Box ce reg" es in the future. She said no legi lion had been formally i oduced. The two appli tons filed are to be exempted fro whatever action Council es. ljaK Littleton said Council W Setting listed implemeqatfbn of the Community Pl as a high priority. Two aspects implementation are pro mg a high - quality built e rronment and developing a citywid chitectural /design revie oard. He said staff is co cling background information and ssembling a study group develop a process, guide' es, and standards for aesthetic rev' Mr. Littleton asked fo olunteers. He said other mmunities have done this success There will be montlily rings for the 12- member up, starting next month. r. Fis an and Mr. Sprague volu red to serve on the com ' tee. 1. Rezoning 98 -024Z - Revised Development Text - Riverside Hospital PCD, Subarea B - Signage - 6335 through 7100 Perimeter Loop Road Mr. McCash moved to table this case for 30 days as requested by the Law Director. Mr. Fishman seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. McCash, yes. (Tabled 7 -0.) 2. Rezoning Ap 'cation 98 -034Z - Cendan nternational - 5200 Rin Road [Mr. McCash used himself and was no ' the chamber during this ase.) Bobbie Cl e said this rezoning appli n is for 5.5 acres on the heast corner of Rings R d and B zer Memorial Parkway. e site is currently zon OLR, Office, Laborato and R arch, and was part of th riginal AT &T training f ' ity. The BZA approv sideyard reduction in March for t Xsite, and that approval r uires this applicant to fi this rezoning (down - zoning) applic on. The OLR District pe its industrial uses whic equire larger side yards. The SO uburban Office Distric only permits office use nd has not sideyard requirement. ff wants to assure that rte with small side yard c not be used industrially. Ms. C ke showed slides of the n and area. She said thi is all a planned district is not ti to the site plan or the arch' lure shown. She said Ri Road will be widened t ' year, and he applicant is dedicatin equate right -of -way for ' . Rings Road will be reb ' t as four lanes with a landscaped m an. This site will have s ed curbcuts with other s in the area. Ms. Clarke said ff recommends approval rth five conditions. 1) That ri -of -way consistent with t City's design for the Ri Road widening project b� d ' ated within 30 days; 2) at all Code requirement e met for lot coverage, ds° ' That Dublin Lighting idelines be met for all si ightir 10- 00 1 Fii>np /MWCU Rezoning /Preliminary Developmut Plan/ Final )development Now( oriditional Use IS.rot ?BL Fi!fi Statim H )0 Hosp;ta; Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of n„yin Q,y, Council Meming Page 5 Meeting \J C 15 too? Council on M day, September 22. \ Mr. Campbell ed the motion I - Mr. Reiner, Yes; M �I goring, yes; May r Kranstuber, yes, Mr. Mrs. Stillwell, the Whole regarding members for i tell to reshor , yes; Ms. Hide yes; Mr. MCC& ve Committee duir, eported that they have )posed plan. Follo g the meeting the Co sty suggested changes o them. The only ch included in the plan. I that Councit move fo d with the Plan, t :or tour portion of the P Ihe, too, has.concerns wi luding realtor yes; Mrs. as a Committee of nee asked that brought forward vi f the many demands the Community Relation division. IN 'on followed. j Mrs. well moved to adopt a strategic tommunicati plan absent the realto tour sect on Mra. Bo ' g seconded the molt - Mr. Reiner, as; Mrs. Stillwell. Yes; or Kranswba, Yes: McCath, y : Ms. Hide PitWugk : Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. pbelt, yes. . Ta d It . moved to appropriate II additional 550, for the special pu art project hrnoting I tcldays. The ktcation been detemtin by the Arts Council to on MuirSeld/Avety B rd south of Brand i� Road. Mr. Reiner seco the motion. Ms. r,Or stated t the plan includes design and installation of a in piece. If Council desires additional ping, that would a separate and additional st. . Boring asked the Pou Road/F ' e was not the rcco one in view of the er visibility and sure at Post and F . Sonora responded the 161/Fraatz she not recommended an eno veering ' e for safety r It. Also laoks availability. The Muu5 d Drive location has uch more visibility m both directions. Mr: er added that the estion at 161/Fran was another reason that site was not Cho Mr. suggested that ncil eonsider.addido funding at a lata.dat . :theardst has put a designs and pro together. it Mayor and Mr. agreed;tlutthe31 ` is•areatistiefigmre - on the bons of the Arts C ncil. jl Mrs. Stillw t stated that she is rtive of an additio $50,000 in funding for a 11 quality an p Jew Mr. Cam mmented that this is an opportunity for a t 'bute to the individual who e, i Dublin what it today. He is sup of spending $120, for this purpose, as jI recommended the Arts Council fessionals. i - Mrs. Stillwell, ; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. cCash, Yes: Mr. Cam yes; Mayor Kran her, yes; Mrs. Bod yes; Ms. Hide Pittalu yes. Mrs. Stillwell mov that Council adopt he memo of September 0, 1997 which identifies location of the art rk and the artist as lected by the Committ Mr. Campbell secon the motion. Vote on the motion - . Reiner, yes; Mr. cCash,no; Mr. Camp 1, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, Yes; Ms. Hide Pittalu yes; Mrs. Boring, y ; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Mr H ide Pittal uaa moved that Council reconsider th Avery Square signage matter reviewed at the last meeting. , Mr. Smith noted that in Council's Rules of Order, Section 11. 10, a member who voted on the prevailing side at the last meeting has the right to move for reconsideration of the action. The i. F ro r r F' o ,- u o E'er 7 Op F- F O U O G V p11p O O 7 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of D r^;t n,�,vat ttf_ ..egg v o Meeting it E3 - g r. d n n. E n N c n `U = G m cal; J G ti O d n Y, '\ Hel September 15, 1997 t i 9 I second can come from either side, and four votes will be required to bring this back for ; consideration Mr. Mccash seconded the motion. Mrs, Stillwell commented that she opposes reconsideration - this spatter has gone through the process, Council and Planning Commission have made the deck ions, and bringing the developer back is not fair in terms of the process. She will vote against a motion for reconsideration. Mr. Campbell stated that he will abstain from this matter for the same reasons he abrAined from discussion at the last hearing. Vote on the motion - Ms. Hide PitWugk yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCasb, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, no; Mayor Krsutuber, yes. stared that he war unable to mend the last.heating;on this matter. He noted that the Avery Square center is loated:owa.substantiat grade and wilf.notbe as visible fiom Avery Road as is Perimeter Center.. At the last meeting, they agreed to nkethe base off the sign: which lowers it by 3 feet. They also agreed to set all of the area back to comply with fiiture widening needs of the City on Avery Road. Therefore, the Avery Square center will sit substantially further back from the roadway than the Perimeter Center across the street. They have also agreed to do substantial landscaping in the setback area, and he showed drawings of this to Council. They have included goose neck fighting on their signage in the - Center, restricted the colors, and have used a similar typeface to the Perimeter signs. He noted that fiom a public poh perspective, Council will want to have signage on Avery Road for the Avery Square center. It is a safety issue for those trying to find businesses located in the Center. He emphasized that the proposed sign on Avery is very tasteful, includes heavy landscaping, and will not overpower the street. He asked that Council not reconsider the jj approval given at the last meeting. I ..� Ms. Clarke stated that Mr. Hale has outlined the facts as she understands them. Staff recommended approval of the sign package at the time of the rezoning and still supports it. I Mayor Kranstuber asked for verification of the size of the sign as proposed and the amount of signage that Perimeter Center is entitled to have on the frontages. Ms. Clarke responded that the proposed sign is approximately 50 square feet which they are entitled to have.. Mr. Smith added that Perimeter Center is allowed 66 square feet per sign face for the two main idemiScuion signs they sm allowed to have under their zoning. Perimeter has not concocted either sign at this time, however. Mayor Ktanstuber asked for further information about how the McDonald's sign affects the signage allowed for Perimeter Center. - Mr. Smith responded that Perimeter is entitled to two main identification signs, not to exceed i 15 feet in height, 19 feet in width and 66 square:feetper sign. .,Hee does not agree with the ' I interpretation that the McDonald's sign on. theoutiparoel -reducetahe availability ofsignage 'for the Perimeter Cemer. The location of the signage for the Center would have to change, but � I not the amount they arc permitted to have. I Mr. McCssh asked Mr. Hate why the Avery Square site does not the same visibility as the i Perimeter Center from Avery/Muirfield. �j Mr. Hale responded that the Perimeter site is at grade. The Avery Square site has a7-foot bank in conformance with the approved grading plan. i Mr. McCash pointed out that the 7 feet of fill was done with the development of the site l .! When the plan was previously reviewed by Council, there was discussion of a 50 foot strip between the two outparcels which Kroger had requested in order to provide visibility of the -. Center's architectural details from Avery/Muirfield. The 7 foot of fill has now precluded the visibility of the Center behind the two outparcels. Mr. Hale responded that the only setbacks which were changed for this Center were in front of I' •. the buildings to abcommodam any future widening of Avery/Muirfield. II ' Mr. McCash noted that the issue here is the 7 feet of fill and its impact on the 50 feet of green space between the two outparcels which was intended to provide visibility from Avery/Muirfield. ® Mr. Hale stated that the grade is not a factor in the visibility from the south to the Center. He emphasized that the sign package they have had approved by Council is good public policy, is it E3 - g r. d n n. E n N c n `U = G m cal; J G ti O d n Y, '\ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of n "blin City r'.. 't meeting Page9 Meeting ® Held September 15, 1997 19_ not intrusive, and includes generous landscaping. Ij ii Mrs. Stillwell stated that she believe signage is necessary for identification of the Center. The j signage as proposed is not intrusive - it is functional. i Mrs. Boring Comment" that in fairness to the applicant and all of the work they have done to modify that signage to conform with the Perimeter signage, she believe they deserve to have the sign as approved at the last meeting. Ms. Ifde Pittaluga stated that the Perimeter Center signage on Avery/Muirfield will probably j jl not be installed because of the small attoumt of space available. It is a business decision to utilise the outparcels, and if the outparcels decrease the visibility for the Centers, the solution is I' not additional signage. She would prefer attractive signage identifying the Centers to having II businesses on the - outparcels...Sho would;uppomik signage as proposed for Avery Square if I it were moved around: the.corrcr ooPakn% erLoop. j ji Mr. R}snot,,rtatedahat,hreyneswiltt Ms.lLdeBitWuga. A customer will havdto .drive into the Cipter to:fimd4w:tewAtL Xhit:is not&-debate about whether or not to havesignage;'but '.i about the location of the signage. j Mayor Kranttdber stated that he is struggling with the aesthetics of the sign. The developer 11 i t has been very cooperative in trying to find a compromise. j Mr. McCash added that if Council approves the signage is requested, it almost certainly j guarantees that Perimeter Curter will come back and ask for their sign to be relocated along i Avery/Muirfield in a location other than the primary entrance to Perimeter Center. The argument will be made that shit is only fair. - Disc continued. i Mr. Smith confirmed that if a motion is made to vacate the previous action of Council on this I 'i matter, the sisnage would then have to be located on Perimeter Loop with a 15 -foot height limitation. The Council action of two weeks ago approved moving the sign to Avery/Muirfield. .� Ms. Hide Pittaluga moved to vacate the Council action of September 3, 1997 regarding the 14 sign package for Avery Square. i� Mr. McCash seconded the motion. I V qB� n them Ion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, n o; Mr. McCash. ts. Boring, no; Ms. Hide Pittalu84 yes. _ ted she received call today from Mr. se who is concernedee on his petty. He is requ a written respo from the City on'ts position matter. oth r ' :mser previously Council, and he. moseAt aellhim '�to thehumin " .the jtuorAo; - thtemvaponaord' 4 Mc Amorose ed that he wdiifd� ....e to informasiow. riTim .Ids.;Aintorosein '' gofCoutrcirs matter, that their opinion not changed. the consensus of 'I to have Mr. mith communicate th 'r position on these which hat not ed since the lass scion. li. at that: r 1. attended the B ificetion Awards p gr III y done. 2. He as faxed Council embers and copied add sled in the miry Plan, includ' set road ays, ensuring 'nfraswaure needs mains fining site ameniti protecting rural car Mr. Cammhell aced that he sery on the Central Ohi board presently has notified t m of his intent to r •, running for re -e ion to Council. a Board would fi ® Council serve in 's position. If an Council member is hey n ify hi asked that they in the nex couple of days. T meeting is Decem I1. em on Council's Clarke about s backs for roadway e taken into &occur s, and including an Transit Authority 'gn in view of the to have! The program items to be retrofitting old vith rezonings, I public buildings. advisory st he is not F 0 -601 Z/R K)P /F[DP /0J Rezon in e/Prel i minary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Ki o,ncr Fucl Station '7100 Hospital Dnvr; RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of jDhm ^..� HS Page 8 Meeting E M Mr. time. . will need )k stated that two reserve an ?or Phase 5. Ituber mom val with the i seconded t ; - on, and asked deeded to th Homeowners e change 42 o be addressed at this Ar" =0 `11p= cl & approval approval from t St' =f The none e will no a t ffix YJansWber a bled they will ge the name on g' 1, lest to something but a little read to have the change App the City staff. by the4moting er -mended his o 'on to include this co ition. cli too small for e coded the motion. - C I its homeowners Mayor Kranst Mrs, Boring so Vote MAA M Pittalugs, yes; � Mn: StillwelL #a; Mayor KnuutubeAyts; Mr. McCxsh, Ms. Hide Boring, yes; Mr. �&mpbell, yes; Mr. Reilpr, yes. I to of way 7fo p pl ats e forwarded t ons YJansWber a approval of the tat for Martin Comm Campbell seco t the motion- Boring asked if s setback has been i red to enure that sa minimum of3 foe. Reim agreed that s setback should checked as some of t setbacks in the C' too small for e e of the buildings o - C I its . yes; Mr . y yes; Mn. Ma ber moved val of the plat. Ms. Pittahrga t the motion. - Mrs. S ' Well, yes; Mayor ber, yes; Mr. Mr. yes; Ms. Ode Pittalu Mn. Boring, Mr. Campbell, yes; . Reiner. yes . Mayor PitWu8A red tha s he is y with the Millro d opment at Bright a nd y point to blip. b 0 - Bright Sawmill setbacks in of the fact that is an entry point to blin. Additional setba. should have been i s to h Mr. Reim noted way to nt in rural took i have emus setbacks, and th Commu can be addressed in Conity Plan. 6= Road Rats'] Cigna lack Rmmldt Smith & Halt representing the applicant stated that the signage for the Avery t. ra -un RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Cwnci{ afeKing Page D Meeting 1997 Road Retail center was tabled at the August meeting so that Council could be shown some mock -ups of the proposed sigoage. ['these Frost representing the Don Cato group, showed slides of the proposed signage for the shopping center. The sign L designed so that the base of the Avery Square sign is even -with the base of the elevation of the center. He then described the and the right-of- way needed for the road widening, and how this impacts the shopping cesuers on Avery Road. Mr. Campbell noted that the Law Director has informed him that the issues related to Wendy's on this site have been resolved., and tonight's issue is separate. Therefore, he will be able to participate in the discussion as he no longer has a conflict of interest. Mr. McCash indicated that he does not support additional signage clutter on Avery Road and does not believe this signage is needed. The rigs as proposed is also too large. The Perimeter Center does not have a sig% and a sign at this caner is not warranted. Mr. Reynolds added that the goal is to identify the shopping center, especially for those new to the area and for visitors to the area. Ms. Newcomb stated that both of the centers, Avery Square and Perimeter Center have similar zoning texts. The perimeter text does allow an ide i fiation sign at the northeast comer in from ofMcDonald's, but them was not room for such a sign after the parcel was sold to McDoneld's. Mr. Reynolds stated that from an economic viewpoint and in order to attract retailers to this site, he can't emphasis enough the importance of this sign. Mrs. Boring stated that abe thinks the brick adds some dignity to the sign and the sign is important in view of this heavily trafficked roadway. Identification of the center is an important goal. Ms. Hide Pittaluge, stated that she would prefer that the height be reduced for the proposed Sign. Mrs. Stillwell stated that it is important to dlaw. for identification, but-it is equally important that the corridor remain visually intact without sight proliferation. She would like to find a' " compromise. Mr. Reynolds stated that they are willing to reduce the height and leave it in that general location. Mr. McCash stated that his tonca s are not related to the heighth or physical esthetics of the structure itsabut rather to the overall location and visual impact on the Avery corridor to having an addtional sign at this location given the location of future signage for the adjaoatt outparcels. Discussion followed. E Mr. Campbell stated that in view of the fact that the Wendy's sign has been mentioned in this discussion, he will now abstain from this matter. i Discussion continued. Mayor Kranstuber moved to approve the sign with the modification of reducing the height to 11 to 12 fat by eliminating the brick, and with the stipulation that the sign remain in the generd area proposed. Ms. ILde Pittaiuga seconded the motion. Vote on the motion _ Mr. Reins, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. MoCash, no; Ms yes; MayorKransnsber, yes, Mrs. Stillwell, yes. 10- OOIZ /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetin 11. 1997 h L 76 h Riverview Street th ed Mrs. Stillwell and staff for th assistance garding the traffic probln S th Riverview Street. She receiv a copy of a staff ro dated August I with proolutions to address the situation, the n ' boyhood representative, she noat they are in favor of the "Do of Enter, One Way nly" sign which is proposed for a section of South High and ort Streets and the parking limitations at Donato' .Ho, they still have cone about the timing of the light at Bridge and High eets and eframe for closin f Blacksmith Alley . Ms. Larson asked when t roposed sol will be on the ouncil agenda. Mr. Hansley clan that unless thermajor obj ton from Council, staff will hand is administrative and will share the oue with uncil in an upcoming packet. Mrs. Still I thanked Ms. Larson foff s and suggested that she discuss r concerns with . Kindra. Staff will continue with the residents and will co unicate the c ges to the residents ahead of im ntation. Staff Comme Mr__. H� and reported tha X�E estival was a financial s cess this year based on the revenues of $78,800 en iar compared with $1 , 00 for the 1993 event. Ms. Puskarcik and he aff shoummended for th ' efforts. Secondly, the eket includeo from Mr. ndra regarding the increased cos $6,000 for the sp humps. Unless an obje 'on, staff will proceed with this pl There as also a memo regae I- bridge enhancements stating tha a City must a pt responsibility for the of the facia beams as outlined in e letter from ODOT. taffwill seek further directiCouncil on these matters dorm a Round Table portion of the meeting. Mr. Helwie reported t the temporary signal at Post a very has now been installed. He commended Mr' . dra and his staff for their timely sponse to Council's recent direct regarding [he ' ersection. He also reported that a signal at Emerald Parkway an ublin Road vvil on normal cycle by Thursday o is week, F ansley introduced the City's n irector of Information Techno , Peter Hue nit7a e comes to the City from a sir' r position with the City of Sprin d, Ohio. Mr H ,� nit a stated that he s distributed a survey to Council garding their needs and concerns. He noted that is delighted to have joined the D fin staff and to be working for the City. LEGISLATION Second ReadjgL $ Public Hearings Qrdinanc Ordinance No. 80 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 28.505 Acres Located on the West Side of Avery- Muirfield Drive, Approximately 600 Feet South of Post Road, from: PCD, Planned Commerce District, to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Text revision for Riverside Hospital PUD - Avery Road Retail), (Applicant: Jackson B. Reynolds III, Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 on behalf of Lucas Avery Limited, Richard Solove & John Chester) Ms. Clarke stated that this application involves 28 acres on the west side of Avery- Muirfreld Drive where a shopping center is under construction. There are two parcels included - the 25 acres on which the shopping center itself sits and two outparcels. The 28 acres has been zoned since the 1980's for retail purposes. This proposed amendment to the PCD text will: I) adjust the set -backs along Avery- Muirfield Drive; 2) reduce the rear yard from 25 feet to 15 feet; and 3) provide for shared parking for ajoint -use restaurant (Wendy's and Tim Horton's). The reduction in parking will be from 105 spaces to 62 spaces. There is also an issue with relocation of the Avery Square Center's main identification sign. In the existing zoning plan, the sign was to be located internal to the site but the applicant has requested that the sign be located on Avery Drive. Mr. Campbell stated for the record that he is abstaining from this case since his wife is employed by Wendy's International. He then IeR the Council Chambers. _w ii C U v n v o � v o bo V c o.w o 0 0 � ono RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Rage -3 Meeting 11, 1997 Ms. Clarke showed Council slides of the area and surrounding area and pointed out the proposed signage site. Staff is recommending approval, and the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval on July 10, 1997 with five conditions: 1) That the text be revised, prior to scheduling the public hearing, to include maintaining the 25 -Coot side yard, maintaining the setbacks in Subarea B2, reducing the number of parking spaces from 105 spaces to 62, and including a detailed sign exhibit, etc. subject to staff approval; 2) That the l0 -foot rear yard setback be landscaped to conform with Code, subject to staff approval; 3) That the site development plan (SD 1.1) submitted with the text change be corrected in accordance with the landscape plan; 4) That off-site parking for 15 cars be maintained to support this restaurant during its existence; and 5) That the balance of the requirements are met in the development plan. Mrs. Stillwell asked Ms. Clarke if the outlots are located on a service road. Ms. Clarke stated that they are located on a service road, not on a public street, Mr. Reiner asked if the architecture for the fast food buildings will be reviewed. Ms. Clarke responded that the architecture will be reviewed as part of the development plan/conditional use review for Subarea B -1, Outlot B at the August 25 meeting of the Planning Commission. Jack Reynolds, 37 W. Broad St., representing the applicant stated that the parking reduction is specific to the Wendy's/Tim Horton use. Any potential future user of the site other than these would have to meet the City of Dublin's parking requirements. In response to a question from Ms. Hide Pittaluga, Mr. Reynolds stated that this is a unique application as two kitchens are required for two separate facilities, but the number of patrons being seated in the restaurant would be the same as for one restaurant. The peak times will be different for Tim Horton's and for Wendy's and therefore the parking reduction will be workable. Mrs. Boring added that P &Z view the shared parking as a positive because it will result in less asphalt. Mr. McCash noted that the text relating to the signage allows for an 8 foot setback while it is shown on the renderings at 25 feet. Mr. Reynolds stated that the 8 foot setback is a minimum, but he assumes that the sign would be set back more since it would be too close to the right -of -way at 8 feet. Mr. McCash stated that the proposed sign of 15 feet in height and 15 feet in width will be a 225 square foot mass on top of 8 feet of fill on the original site. Therefore, the height of this sign will be very high along a 35 mph road and could potentially be 8 feet back from the building setback line. He does not support having 225 square feet of signage mass which will block the view of the shopping center behind it. Mr. Reynolds responded that their goal is sign visibility and it will conform with the sign code in every respect. The 1989 rezoning application did not have the foresight about signage location that the applicant has at this time. Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that visuals would help to understand this issue. Mr. Reiner stated that he agrees with Mr. McCash, that visually, there will be too much signage in too short of a distance. Mayor Kransmber suggested that Council approve the text revisions with the exception of the signage. Mr. Smith suggested that Council approve the rezoning, excluding the signage portion which u. A a c E ay o c m o 0 c:. Ea Np N c ak o ° ° > 0 0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dub Meetin 1997 could then be tabled until a future meeting. Mrs. Boring moved approval of the ordinance with the 5 conditions of Planning Commission, and with a sixth condition, that the sign package be improved and brought back to Council for review at a later date. Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motion. Ms. Bide Pittaluga asked that the applicant provide visuals for the next review meeting. Vote on the motion - Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Vote on the ordinance - Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes. Ordinance o. 95 -97 - An Ordinance Re- tablishing the Parks and Re cation Adviso Committee. Mrs. tillwell stated that she has wor d with Mr. McDaniel on the fi points of this o tnance and the cemetery co Sion ordinance. They have atte pled to outline the responsibilities of PRAC, to Cl fy that PRAC acts in an advis capacity, and to specify the composition of PRAC. Mrs. Boring noted that a is uncomfortable with severs. ortions of this ordinance/esp lly paragraph 2(c) regar ng the "Master Plan ". Mr. McDaniel st d this was modeled after the ' of Worthington Parks Co ' provides that C has some role in compre sive park planning and usage. is is similar to the Cc tery Commission's work on a ster plan, Mayor anstuber would like further d' ussion regarding Section 2(c) Fo wing further discussion, Mrs. (well moved to table Ordinan o. 95 -97 until the eptember 3 1997 meeting. Mr. Reiner seconded the mo ' n. Yote on the motion - Mr. ampbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittalu , yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes, McCash, yes; Mr. Rei r, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. dlwell, yes. Ordinance No 6-97 - An Ordinance Establ" ing the Cemetery Advisory ommittee. Mrs. Stillwe moved to table Ordinance No 6 -97 until the September 3, 19 meeting. Mayor nstuber seconded the motion. - Ms. Hide Pittal a, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. cCash, yes, Mr. R ' er, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ma r Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campb , yes. Ordinance No. ,01-97 - Ordinance Authorizing the ecution and Delivery of an Economic Developme Agreement to Induce a Leas etween Duke Realty Linutpd L Partnership and International Management ry ices, Inc. of Approximate 156,000 Square eet of Newly Constructed O e Space, Thereby Increasin Employmen ithin the City, and Declarin an Emergency. Mr. Hansl stated that this has been prep with emergency language a Mr. Helwig is . presen o respond to any questions. Mr. elwig stated that the ordinane authorizes execution of an eco mic development cement. This agreement wo or have been approve n the spec building stage of the development; at this time a cable fiber optics have been ' stalled and the execution of the formal documents is now cessary. Ms. Grigsby added th rdinance 111 -97 appropriate a payment of $300,000 to L as a follow -up to this a ling legislation. Staff will re st that the public heating be d' eased with for Ordina e 111 -97. Mayor Kran ber moved to treat this as em ency legislation. Mrs. St il ell seconded the motion. ., ._ _ shop - Mrs. Stillwell, y ; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. yor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Camp 1, yes; Ms. Ihde Pittaluga, Vote on the ordinance -Ms ' Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Reiner, y McCash, yes; Mayor Kranst er, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mty Mrs. Bonne. ves: Bori 10-0017. /PDP /PDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Council v g ro Meeting Held— June 23, 1997 i Mr, a responded that /he t with the neighbors d have assured them tha ewe e done on both the th. He will meet tth them again when the ign is ompleted prior to the PI mission meetin . �i Mr Campbell mo to approve the concept an subject to the conditi s of Planning and Zoning Co ' ton. Mr. Reiner conded the motion. Ms. Hid ittaluga asked if Counci ould be interested in ha ' g a Committee discuss I com hensive planning for this hole area north and sout of Avery. Campbell responded tha 's is being discussed as rt of the Community Plan ork. h - Mr ampbell, yes; Mr. Reine es; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, y , Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor nstuber, yes; Mr. McCas , yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. n Clarke ted that Council action i e a eeded on the final plat b it can be recorded . in an ornntission recommende pproval on August 1, 199 with 14 conditions: I) hat the developer meet the zoning and prelimina plat conditions; 2 That the definition o ' no -build zone" be amende nd noted on the plat, an omeowners' associatio all in the landscape in the no -build zones; 3) That all "no png" zones be noted on th lat, and "no vehicular a ss" be noted on the plat for all lot ntages on Dublin Road or merald Parkway; 1 4) That th encing information from p e 3 of the preliminary de opment plan text (July 2, 199 ersion) be noted on the p with the fence details, w ii are included in the to as figure , 2 and 3; . -., 5) rhat it is demonstrated to a satisfaction of staff tha ots 1, 2, 10 -12, and 18 I b ' able with similar dwellin , structures, and features' t are typical on lots in C entry odds in compliance wit development standards 6) That the applic provide a clear design c rot plan for the arcftitect eon all side and rear facades of uses abutting Emerald P ay; 7) That slo easements along Dublin ad and Emerald Parkwa rontages be shown on the plat; 8) TI the side yard setbacks rellIfffernents shown in the si a family design guidelin of the ap oved text be changed to r d "Note: 8' minimum on tde; combined side yard s ack 20 rcent of lot width' That revised final I scape and grading plans submitted that are consi nt with the designs for Emerald Pa ay and street tree plan submitted, as approved b staff, 10) That 1.36 ac s (25 percent of the prop ed 5.45 acre park) be de - ated to the City by general warranty eed in conjunction with t recording of Killilea, Sec n 1; 11) That t developer provide the n essary erosion mitigation the existing swales downstre of the box culvert, the 2 inch culvert, and the culy being installed by the Ci , as req - by the City Engineer; 12) That the developer ins an eight -foot bikepath a g Dublin Road as part o e he improvements for th subdivision, and that the eloper cooperate with t Ian for a ten -foot (federal stands bike path along Dublin d, including revision of t grading plan, landscape plan, and at for parallel easements City Council chooses to ursue that design; l3) That all o e changes required abov e submitted to staff wit 30 days; and 14) That restrictions affecting dev pability of lots be includ to the deed restrictions. Mayor anstuber moved to appr the final plat of Killilea h the conditions of Plan ' g and -oning Commission. . Campbell seconded the otion. Yore on the motion - M or, Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. (well, yes; Ms. Hide Pitt ga, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes, Mrs. Bo ' g, yes; Mr. McCash, yes r. Campbell, yes. Final Plat - Riverside Hospital PCD - Ave S quare Ms. Clarke stated that the final plat for the Riverside Hospital PCD involves the roads that are necessary to service the shopping center which is nearing completion. The final plat includes 10 -001 Z /I Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting 1997 the first sections of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road west of Avery/Muirfield Drive. The alignments of' lose two roads have yet to be determined and will be dependent on a series of things relating t the freeway access, the land uses the hospital proposes, and the desires of the property owners the west. Perimeter Drive will be extended to the west and back to Post Road. Perimeter Loop may be cul -de -sated within the Riverside Hospital piece. The plat needs to be recorded before the roads can be open and therefore the shopping center. There is some delay with the southern entrance at Perimeter Loop Road, and the center may open using just Perimeter Drive. The City Engineer has indicated that the Perimeter Loop entrance cannot be opened until the signal is operational. This final plat reflects the requirements of the preliminary plat and staff is recommending approval with the 5 conditions appended by Planning and Zoning Commission on May 15, 1997: i) That the final plat be revised to comply with the preliminary plat and staff comments before scheduling the City Council hearing; 2) That a deed of temporary easement for the temporary bikepath between Post Road and Perimeter Drive be provided to the Engineering Division prior to recording of the final plat; 3) That the traffic signal at Perimeter Drive be constmcted, tested, and operational prior to the opening of the shopping center, and that Perimeter Loop Road remain closed until the traffic signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive has been constructed, tested, and is operational; 4) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by staff, during all phases of development; *and 5) That the front setback of Avery- Muirfield Drive be established at not less than the 30 feet of green space that is shown on the green highlighted exhibit (marked Exhibit 'W') submitted by staff to Council on April 22, 1996, and that in the effort to maximize green spaces, the footages shown on such exhibit be used as minimum requirements. (* condition carried over from the preliminary plat) Mr. Hale repres nting Rverside Hospital stated that they are working with the owners of the property on the eastern side of Avery- Muirfield to coordinate the tragic signal installation. The design has been done, and he understands that the shopping center cannot have the road access until the signal is installed. Mr. McCash stated that he would like for them to speed up the installation of this signal. Mr. Hale responded that he will meet with the Casio company representatives in the morning and they will send a letter to Mr. Kindra with a specific date for installation of the signal. Mr. Campbell stated that he will abstain from voting because Wendy's, his wife's employer, is now to be a user of one of the parcels in the area. This was not the case at the time of preliminary plat approval. Mr. Reiner moved to approve the final plat of the Riverside Hospital PCD with the 5 conditions of the Planning Commission. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Yote on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, abstain. i n h in i .,nri h Vi it f r r i n v' imittec presented Coun wit letter summarizing their nments regarding the con uation or abolishment mmittee: 1) If City Council is ' retested in civic input reg ing the issues surrounds parks and recreation (outside th obby efforts of special int est groups), then consider a reinstatement of PRAC; 2) IfP is reinstated, Council is u d to aggressively recruit cross section of the community serve as committee mem rs. With greater diversit RAC's recommendation on recr tonal issues would provid fair representation of th sews and concerns of D in 10 -001 Z/PDP /fDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 15, 1997 f,ITY Of UU111 IN 5800 Slur Rugs Road Oo6tat, 0H 13016 -7295 IAaaa/I00: 614/161 -6550 tar 614/161 -6506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Final Plat 97 -048FP - Riverside Hospital PCD - Avery Square Location: 34.33 acres located on the west side of Avery- Muirfield Drive, between US 33 /SR 161 and Post Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of the final plat under the provisions of Section 152.085. Proposed. Use: Commercial subdivision for retail center and other uses. Applicant: Owners: Hospital Properties, Inc., Richard J. Solove, Lucas Avery Ltd., and John J. Chester, c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this final plat with five conditions: 1) That the final plat be revised to comply with the preliminary plat and staff comments before scheduling the City Council hearing; 2) That a deed of temporary easement for the temporary bikepath between Post Road and Perimeter Drive be provided to the Engineering Division prior to recording of the final plat; 3) That the traffic signal at Perimeter Drive be constructed, tested, and operational prior to the opening of the shopping center, and that Perimeter Loop Road remain closed until the traffic signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive has been constructed, tested, and is operational; 4) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by staff, during all phases of development;* and 5) That the front setback of Avery- Muirfield Drive be established at not less than the 30 feet of greenspace that is shown on the green highlighted exhibit (marked Exhibit "A ") submitted by staff to Council on April 22, 1996, and that in the effort Page 1 of 2 10- 001'LAPDP /FDp /Cu Rezoning /preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 15, 1997 3. Final Plat 97 -048FP - Riverside Hospital PCD - Avery Square (Continued) to maximize greenspaces, the footages shown on such exhibit be used as minimum requirements. * - Condition carried over from the preliminary plat. ** Jack Reynolds, Smith and Hale, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This final plat was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Mary 14. Newcomb Landscape Planner 10-00 1 Z /PD P/RDMU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Phial Page 2 of 2 Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 15, 1997 Page 5 Chris Hanwood AS ervices, represe Ameritech, said employees. le there are only fon mployees at the siu on occasion. was noted that the are several fleet vet extra parking was t needed for td some technici s i vsII this site on the site. Mr. Srring a and Mr. Fe thought the sidewal condition should deleted. ag reed with r. Ferrara that its Id be* assured tha a landscaping al g the east ptoperty line would be jeopardized by mounding of this ite, etc. Ms. Ne mb said the staff would over this Mr. Ferrara e a motion to app ve this application, ecause it ism kee g with the area, no a terations, and brin the site into land pe compliance, w' six conditions; 1) t proposed mate ' s match existing terials, subject to taff approval; 2) That the site be rought into full 1 scape complian with the revised dscape Code, ' clu . dumpster screenin , 3) That lightin conform with the blin Lighting Gu' e'ties; 4) That sto water managemen acilities conform Dublin design s ds; 5) That king lot pavement ickness and layo e subject to staff proval; and 6) Th a site dimension an and revised 1 scape plan be so itted to the PI g vision with two w ring seconded motion, and the v was as follows: r. Lecklider, yes; r. Harian, es; Ms. Chinnici- rcker, yes; Mr. Pe ow, yes; Mr. Spra e, yes; Ms. Bonin yes, and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (A roved 7-0.) 3. Final Plat - Riverside Hospital PCD - Avery Square - Section 1 Mary Newcomb presented this final plat. The site contains 34 acres on the west side of Avery- Muirfield Drive within the Riverside Hospital PCD. The entire PCD contains 120 acres. The site is zoned for retail uses and includes two outparcels on Avery- Muirfield Drive. The shopping center is under construction,. The first sections of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road are included as well as right -of -way for Post Road and establishes the first three lots. She said the Perimeter Drive traffic signal will be upgraded, and a new signal will be installed at Perimeter Loop Road. The location and alignment of future Perimeter Loop Road has not been established. URS Consultants has been studying the Avery corridor. She said that Condition 3 regarding traffic signals needs to be revised due to information just received from the City Engineer. The shopping center will be able to open prior to the installation of the Perimeter Loop traffic signal, as long as the street is blocked and not used. Ms. Newcomb said several notes from the preliminary plat need to be repeated on this final plat - The setback on the outparcels is subject to a rezoning application schedule for June. It will permit a reduced rear yard to accommodate a wider right -of -way and setback along Avery- Muirfreld Drive. *Italics indicate where amended on June 5, 1997 by Commission. 10- 001Z /PD P/FOP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Penal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 15, 1997 Page 6 She said a bikepath is being built on the south side of Perimeter Drive. An easement for the temporary bikepath connection to Post Road needs to be shown on the plat. She said staff recommends approval with four conditions: 1) That the final plat be revised to comply with the preliminary plat and staff comments before scheduling the City council hearing. 2) That a deed of temporary easement for the temporary bikepath between Post Road and Perimeter Drive be provided to the Engineering Division prior to recording of the final plat; 3) That the traffic signal at Perimeter Drive be constructed, tested, and operational prior to the opening of the shopping center, and the Peri meter Loop Road remain closed until the traffic signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive has been constructed, tested, and is operational; and 4) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by staff, during all phases of development.* * - Condition carried over from the preliminary plat. Mr. Harian asked how this plat affects Dublin's interchange efforts at US 33. Ms. Newcomb said this area is not affected, but the city is still working with the hospital on a purchase agreement. Mr. Harian asked if Dublin has considered requiring a wash -out station on construction sites requiring vehicles exiting to hose off their tires. Randy Bowman said this has been in use here. Ms. Clarke said the setback issue is being addressed by a text amendment (rezoning) on the June agenda. The setback issue affects only the outparcels. It does not affect the shopping center or this plat. The greenbelt required in the Council approval of the preliminary plat is not affected. Ms. Boring wanted the Council condition carried forward to this final plat. Mr. Ferrara wondered if Dublin is protected against development on Perimeter Loop Road which could interfere with possible interchange plans. Ms. Clarke said this phase of the plata does not present any conflict with an interchange. This issue will need to be addressed before Perimeter Loop Road is extended. Randy Bowman said the alignment of only this first phase, and the final plat reflects the approved alignment. Jack Reynolds, attorney for the applicant, said he agrees to the conditions, including the reworded Condition 3. lie said this applicant owns the shopping center site but not the interchange - related property. He said the rezoning application regarding the setbacks on the outparcels has been filed. Water features are located at the entrance on Perimeter Loop Road and south of Perimeter Drive. Mr. Peplow asked about protection of the landmark oak. Ms. Newcomb said it was protected by a chain link fence, and this condition was repeated to reinforce its long -term care. 10 -001 zn>u P/rU P/cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 710011ospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 15, 1997 Page 7 Mr. Sprague said traffic in the Avery corridor is getting more congested. He thought there should be an interim plan for Avery- Muirfield Drive to the north of the bridge. Randy Bowman said a major traffic study was performed for the Dublin Place Mall application a few years ago, and it has been updated. Signals area being added at Perimeter Loop Road and the US 33 ramps. Also, the Shier -Rings /Avery intersection is being improved. Ramp changes need federal approvals. Mr. Sprague said without improvement, he expected a resident blacklash due to the congestion. Mr. Peplow was glad the rear of the center was upgraded because it is very visible. Mr. Lecklider said studies of Avery go back almost ten years, and improvement is needed soon. Ms. Boring made a motion to approve this final plat with five conditions: 1) That the final plat be revised to comply with the preliminary plat and staff comments before scheduling the City Council hearing. 2) That a deed of temporary easement for the temporary bikepath between Post Road and Perimeter Drive be provided to the Engineering Division prior to recording of the final plat; 3) That the traffic signal at Perimeter Drive by constructed, tested, and operational prior to the opening of the shopping center, and that Perimeter Loop Road remain closed until the traffic signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive has been constructed, tested, and is operational; 4) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by staff, during all phases of development; * and 5) That the front setback of Avery- Muirfield Drive be established at not less than the 30 feet of greenspace that is shown on the green highlighted exhibit (marked Exhibit "A ") submitted by staff to Council on April 22, 1996, and that in the effort to maximize greenspaces, the footages shown on such exhibit be used as miminum requirements.* *- Condition carried over from the preliminary plat. Mr. Sprague seconded the motion. Mr. Reynolds accepted the above conditions. The vote was as follows: Mr. Lecklider,.yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes, Mr. Peplow, yes;, Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; and Ms. Boring, yes.(Approved 7 -0) 4. Prel' inary Plat 97- SPP - Perimet/reswitt er, Subarea D - V ure Drive B : ie Clarke prese ed this plat for 77 hin Su barea D f Perimeter Center She said enture Drive wi loop to the south o erimeter Drive aliQ > with Metatec D ' e and Wall Street. She sai ere is a landmark 8 inches in caliper) h kberry which is n shown on the preliminary at. The sanitary s er line is being rer ted around this tr A letter from PomerVY?ts: ociates was distri ted to the Commis n on this issue. . Clarke said it is respon the m ost imm ate concerns of the ff. 10 -0o I Z /POP /rDP /Co Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pinal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FLICI Station 7100 1- lospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS M inutes of Dublin City Coun Maaltlr Page T Meeting 16. bit,, ndscape easements be icated on the plat for those at between the development contiguous property owners tadlee and Paglierq. Mrs. Still ask ince `h a str � daumined thh me c of streams can the ov be Ijurious cleaning to the stream . .Mr. Kindrs respo that this stream bed was riot p of the stream survey. Mrs. Stillwell toted that page I1 of the January 19, 199 tall report. it states that a plan most be submitted for review and approval. It w as t pan of the conditbtu, and riders whether a meet tree was submitted. Zimmer confirmed thmt a m tree plan has been submitted. Mr. 1 moved approval of the ual plat of Mutrfield Vlltage 44, Sections 1 tit 2.subject to the of Planning & Zonin Mr. Za seconded the motion. Haft. Y Mr: Campbell, - Ms. Hide Pituluga. yes. es; Mr. Mccash,: yes; Mr. Zawd es; Mayor Kransiuber. yet; . Stillwell, yes. Ms. ttdClarke noted that this pcopacy was [toned back io 1999. and subsequent to the Planning hearings of January and Febntary of this year. A traffic study for the widening of Avery Road has indicated that additional right-of- -way will be needed. The developer agreed as pan of the conditions of P&Z to accommodate the projected widening in accordance with the Avery Road interchange study currently underway. an d has given the City the right to use the 30-foot parking setback to accommodate the road widening. Staff is concerned that if the landscape setback becomes roadway easement, the Perimeter landscaping would be reduced. The Avery•Muirfield buff& plan requires the full 30-foot setback. At this time, the City estimates needing 15 feet of the setback for additional right-of-way, which would adjust the setback line to 45 feet to ensure adequate great space. The compromise reached with the developer was to reduce the requirement for rear yard setbacks for the outparcels at the western edge, allowing for mote greenspace at the Avery Road frontage, and providing for the same net developable am for the project. The problem with this solution is that it requires a zoning test amendment which would require the recommendation of approval from the Planning Commission and then Council approval. E Staff has submitted to Council tonight a revised pseliminary plat with the setback lhtes removed from t h e Avery Road fronage and along the rear yard. The developer-,has zoonasubled to submit a rezoning request, and on behalf of staff, Ms. Clarke has inured the developer," staff will support the request. Mr. Smith commented that the solution proposed by staff involves Council approving the plat this evening without setbsek lives, based upon suft's recommendation, and allowing die public improvements and privet hoprovements to be Initiated. An Additional factor Involved is that in 1988, agreem wee reached with the landowners whereby the landowners provided $650,000 for improvements to Avery Road with the understanding that additional right-of-way would not be required. They are, however, willing to provide the additional tightol -way, and immediAttlY c following this they will file the rescuing which will elfadlveiy move the entire project west process, by 15.20 feet. The law department recommends this solution for a development project which has already been designed And engineered. ° C N E Mr. Campbell pointed out that the outpatcels actually back up to parking lot, to the parking lot screening would be reduced. o Mr. Hale pointed out that the setbacks in Perimeter Caner for Bank die and McDonald's are g feet, o while the Kroger development will have 15 feet, nearly double what Is across the street. d c o r Mr. McCash asked about the purpose of a no -build area of 150 feet as shown between oudou A and o N B. a u a Ms. Clarke responded that this Is Kroger's protection of the visual corrWorm their situate. It Is not a City regnira ncM Mr. Hale added that it provides for separation of the buildings And provides an architectural control o o u nn c o C4 Y �\ feature in site plannlg. '-' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting C J IJ Het April 22 1996 19____- Mr. Zawaly asked if there are use restrictions for the outiou A and B. Ms. Clarke responded that they are restricted to service uses . fast food, a bank, a gas station. Mayor Krammbu asked if Council will have the opportunity to review the architecture for the Project. Ma. C Uke responded that Council reviews architecture in the rezoning action. in this case, the architectural commitments were contained in the text in the 1989 rezoning. Within the last 6 ; devdopweolVIM.wae,submbted-to Plarmiwg' Commission : and have ban 8PProved. Mayon Kanshrba added that this is an important corridor and he wants to be assured "dust the development will have the same level of quality as the Perimeter Center aeross the strew. Regarding the setback hum. Mr. Hale stated that they believe onig $ proposal constitutes a good solution. They will file the plat to make the setback adjustment'. Disctasbn then followed about the ramifications of approving the preliminary plat with the astumpton that the setbacks proposed in she solution will brapproved by Council eta later date. it was emphasized that Pad does not reammc d- approval of the rezoning. Council would have to sppsove it by a viper Majority. Mr. Hanttey emphasized that it is important to ascertain tonight that at least five members of Council support the proposed solution. Ms. Clarke pointed out the w orst c ase scenario where the widening could possibly require all 30 fee al ali is s prelimi�narry, an d staff i staff also supports situ edian cone empha along Av M infield Drive in this area. Discussion followed about the available setbacks from Avery and from the western edge of the project. Ms. Clarke emphasized that Mr. Hale maintains that the 1989 zoning gave them a certain developable area in the two outparcds, wed throughout the engineering and development plan process, he has operated wish the understanding that the developable area will be the same. Mr. }iateis;ntereued in exploring any compromise or solutions which will not contract the developable area. Mayor Kranshrber commented that In his opinion, he does not believe the existing setback at McDowald's is adoquate. He asked about what legal rights the developer has based on a 1989 zoning considering that many factors have now changed. Mr. Hawley responded that the developer donated rightof way -twice; ard.unde a turaeyarty agreement, the road was built and th r i g ht-of-way was.donated - they paid one ddrd:of die ow of the total road project which extewded.beyond Post Road. Mayor, Kramtuber eommeate i that they dadethe comrlbutom-6ecau3e'they wawteddo develop-in the City of Dublin, it hopontant that this gateway to Dublin be gran. with a treeaiwed boulevard. i He added that if they need more land in order to accommodate the road widening, the developer can either buy more land or sale down the project. presented architectural renderings to Council of the P10ject. He noted That the zoning text of 1989 dictates that it be of residential sale, with Pont= and columns. The Center will be primarily trick and tone Thee are UMM and decorative column elements which spat thwatbout the project. They have worked with staff ow criteria for slgna C and Individual (emus will be limited to 24' high externally Utuminated letters. Kroger, the anchor II store, is the only tenant which wilt be allowed to have internally illuminated letters and it will comply with do Dublin limitation of 80 squat: fed for graphics. He noted that the brick and stone have ben brought to the rest of the shopping center in compliance with the zoning text, and a slate roof has been bhoenporated. the owners have agreed to preserve the large tree on the site. Mr. Campbell asked who will occupy the two outlots. :i Mr. Hale stated that so decision has been made to date. He noted that the outparats have to entry !j o ff of Perimeter or Perimeter Loop which will limit the type of tenants. iI Ms. Hide PhWuga stated drat the project is well done, mractive and adheres to high standards. She asked if Council can reserve the right in tonight's action to object to other pocom of the plan at another time. i 4 V , o 0 0 o � r J pro U T o 0 ,5 c o G_ 5 O o�� RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of D ublin City Counc M o v ing Page 9 Meeting Hel April 22 1996 19— I! I Mr. Hale confirmed that they will still have to return to Planning Commission for final development ' plan approval. The setbacks on this plat have been removed, so there is no commitment on the i City's part as to what the setbacks are. They will have to go through a rezoning process to adjust I' the setbacks. it Mayor Kramtuber pointed out that the worst case scenario is that there may not be enough area available to accommodate a median In the future. a Ms. Clark* stated thatlhevontultaoCbts recommended 9 lanes for Avery Road. If a median is also added.,thWsI would bava,to be complete resnglaeered. Mrs, poring stated that perbaps the lanes could be made smaller in order to preserve the greempace. the developer has been very accommodating in terms of greenspaee. Mrs. Stillwell added that in terms of traffic in 2020, there are solutons.on.the supply side and : demand side that could be a factor In the future plans. She is satisfied with the solution proposed j tonight. j Mr. Campbell commented that expects acknowledge that cities an never build enough roads and ? have to consider oche solutions to MM problem. He believes the greenspace peal preserves ,i the green feeling along Avery Road. He fawn the solution proposed tonight, subject to the i conditions of P&Z. i Mayor Ksamtubec suggested another alternative - reducing the parking. Ms. Clarke responded that Kroger bat its own requirements for parking which are more restrictive it than Dublin's Code. Discussion followed about the various areas where setback could be taken from and added to the Avery- Muirfield setback - the puking lot screening, etc. Reducing the parking would also free up space. Mr. Hale summarized that the commitment they will make is to make the from yard setback as large as they an make work while still having the appropriate buffering for the parting lots for the outparah and driveways. Unless there is some reason it does not make sense, they are willing to adjust the puking lot aereenb4 to add more setback to the front. i Mr. Zawaly then moved to approve the revised preliminary plat, dated April 22, 1996, abject to !� the 3 conditions of P&Z. as contained in the Record of Action of January 14, 1996, with the i) additional condition that the from setback on Avery- Muirfield Drive be aublished In conjunction with staff to ma:imW green space, and that o.do:so;the:ettirelfootpdntofdw outparcelswfil.be ! moved back toward the parking .bt,-and that site mumbor in that.padting:1ot will be reviewed in oonjwaba wkh tlw maximizing -of heAvery.- Muirfield greemspace. :I Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Following brkf disamio t, Mr. Zawsly amended his motion to state, 'that the from setback on Avery- Muirtidd Drive be atabtished at not less than the 30 fat of gcarnspace that is shown on the green highlighted exhBnk (Marked Exhibit W) submitted by staff to Council on Apd122, 1996, and :i .. that In.the,~ to mulatize time greempaces, the footagea shown on such exhibit be used as minimum ralmicemetls.' Mr. Campbell seconded the amended motion. Mr. Hale agreed to the conditions. ?; Vote on the motlnm - W. Campbell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, Yes; Mayor Kranstuber, 00; Mr. McCfh, yea; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. innppy"'Ri .err nr my, but guy q explained that the t ter property is tow abed, ' It Crossing North, Sea txmulsta of 1 I I aver north a eat of 1 -270 and Rings. 77tk hminary plat was It tevkwed by Commission tom April 1996 and has been f o Council expodWously In a mat the commitments of nxraa regarding the public vatbnu. The Arcs phase Of will include the ent ength of Emerald P ® portion of Woereer a between Emerald Parkway the west pre mottbanmostpiecitof Drive of thelooproad. 7Le muy Islas 10- O01Z /PDP /FDP /CU stermwater pin and psovWa the overall tmdllty teviCe, shows Reron ing /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final strata. Thlaplat hat notes which addrots the Engle Development Plan /Conditional Use appal Of die plat four conditions listed In the re Kroger 1'nel Station Action the Warming Conunluhan dot April it, 1996. 7100 hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION March 14, 1996 CITY OR DtIBIAN sm stiff Rags Road OAN OR 43016 -1236 rhme/IDD: 614/161 -6550 kx:614/161.6506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regular meeting: 1. Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Location: 25.346 acres and 3.159 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 feet south of Post Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside hospital Plan). Request: Development plan approval under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: Construction of a 230,000 square foot retail center. Applicants: Lucas Land Development c/o Don Casto Organization, 209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital Properties, Inc. c/o Frank T. Pandora 1I, 3535 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. MOTION: To approve this development plan with the following 13 conditions: 1) That the proposed sign limitations ( one internally illuminated sign) be submitted in writing and incorporated part of the development plan approval; 2) That the proposed colors for tenant signage be submitted at the Commission meeting and be subject to approval; 3) That any and all mechanical equipment be shown in elevation on plans submitted for building permits, and that the equipment be totally screened in compliance with Code with materials harmonious with the building; 4) That the plans for development of the out parcels incorporate materials, colors, and architectural detailing consistent with the center; 5) That signage and landscaping for the out parcels be coordinated, controlled and consistent with those of the center; 6) That the parking lot lighting be designed to meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and with light fixtures of the same design to be used on all parcels; Page I of 2 10 -001Z /13171 PICU Rezoning /Prelinunary Development I'll" Final Development Plan/Conditional Use Kroger Purl Station 7100 Hospital Duvc DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION March 14, 1996 1. Development Plan - Riverside Hospital P.D. - Retail Subareas (Coot.) 7) That outdoor or drive- through uses be subject to further review by the Commission as conditional uses; 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected by sturdy fencing during all phases of the development; 9) That the ponds be modified with regard to freeboard to improve their appearance subject to Staff approval; 10) That the landscape plan be modified to completely conform to the Code, and be consistent with the Avery- Muirfield landscape treatment plan (1995 plan designed by Mary Newcomb; 11) That all mounding to be used to meet screening requirements be shown on the grading plan in addition to the landscape drawings; 12) That the developer install the signal upgrade, and fund half the cost of designing and installing a signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive; and 13) That the eastern entrance into the retail center be limited to right in/right out movements at a future date. * Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director Page 2 of 2 t0- 001Z /PDP /rue /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger FUCI Station 7100 1- lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 14, 1996 Page 2 1. Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Bobbie Clarke presented this development plan for 28 acres split of the 117 acres known as the Riverside Hospital PCD. The preliminary plat was approved at the February 14th Commission meeting. She said this is the retail center piece of the site and has access from Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. The proposal is for a 225,000 square foot retail center, plus the establishment of two outparcels located on the west side of Avery- Muirfield Drive. Outparcel development will be presented for consideration at a later date. Ms. Clarke said there is a landmark tree on the northern third of the site. Perimeter Drive will be extended through this site and continue out further to the west. Perimeter Loop will also be extended at least partially through this site. The "L "- shaped shopping center will be in two buildings. Modifications have been made to the architectural treatment along the back side of the west building. The landmark tree is being substantially protected. There are two wet ponds, one located at the extreme northwest corner of the site and one at the main entrance. The surface area of the pond and the freeboard (the amount of water fluctuation during heavy rainfalls) have been concerns. Staff believes these issues can be resolved with the applicant by placing in the parking lot, etc. The roof lines and elevations on the back sides have been changed as a result of the Commission's concerns. Staff is now recommending approval because of the modifications. One of the large issues outstanding was the tenant signage. Staff and the Commission have taken the position that both sides of Avery Road should be treated equally regarding signs. The applicant has verbally agreed to limit the signage within this center to one internally illuminated sign for the major (grocery) tenant. All other signs within the shopping center will be externally illuminated with gooseneck fixtures on the outside of the building. Their signs will be cut plastic letters in one of several preselected subdued colors. The color palette has not been submitted. While this is a different approach to signage, Staff feels it is about equal to Perimeter Center. Ms. Clarke reviewed the Perimeter Center sign restrictions. Staff is recommending approval of this development plan with the following 13 conditions: 1) That the proposed sign limitations ( one internally illuminated sign) be submitted in writing and incorporated as part of the development plan approval; 2) That the proposed colors for tenant signage be submitted at the Commission meeting and be subject to approval; 10 -00I Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ f=inal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 1- lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 14, 1996 Page 3 3) That any and all mechanical equipment be shown in elevation on plans submitted for building permits, and that die equipment be totally screened in compliance with Code with materials harmonious with the building; 4) That the plans for development of the outparcels incorporate materials, colors, and architectural detailing consistent with the center; 5) That signage and landscaping for the outparcels be coordinated, controlled and consistent with those of the center; 6) That the parking lot lighting be designed to meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and with light fixtures of the same design to be used on all parcels; 7) That outdoor or drive- through uses be subject to further review by the Commission • as conditional uses; 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected during all phases of the development; 9) That the ponds be modified with regard to freeboard to improve the appearance subject to Staff approval; 10) That the landscape plan be modified to completely conform to the Code, and be consistent with the Avery- Muirfield landscape treatment; 11) That all mounding to be used to meet screening requirements be shown on the grading plan in addition to the landscape drawings; and 12) That the developer install the signal upgrade, and fund half the cost of designing and installing a signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive; and 13) That the eastern entrance into the retail center be limited to right in/light out movements at a future date. Mr. Sutphen asked if a letter had been sent to Council from the Commission regarding the Avery Road/US 33 Interchange. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher indicated it had. Ms. Boring said money had been appropriated for full review of the area and the traffic needs. Council will consider that design when it is presented. She said Council was aware that the option expired in less than a year. Mr. Sutphen asked about Condition #10 regarding landscaping. He asked which of the four treatments along Avery- Muirfield Drive was to be used. Ms. Clarke said it would be the last changes designed by Mary Newcomb. It includes 3 1/2 foot pilasters with hedging material between them. Staff believes Muirfield Drive should have the same appearance on both sides and this goal has generally been incorporated in this plan, but Staff wants to make sure that the same species is used. Mr. Rauh asked what kind of adjustment was needed for the handicap parking. Ms. Clarke said Peter Lenz, Dublin Chief Building Official, had indicated that some of the spaces needed to be located next to the building side. Ben W. Hale, Jr., attorney, the applicant, agreed to the above 13 conditions. He provided 10 -001 Z/PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger .Fuel Station 7 100 1 lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 14, 1996 Page 4 signage criteria to the Commissioners. He said the signs had been reduced on the buildings and blade signs had been placed along the walkways. The color palette for the letters was included in the booklet provided to the Commission. He said the signage was equal to that across the street. Mr. Hale said the one pond had been reduced to a minimum of 5 1/2 feet of freeboard. The pond should be an aesthetic amenity, not just a detention pond. Mark Ford, Ford Berry Architects, presented the west elevation of the western building. A manufactured slate roof and parapets which will help screen the rooftop units, have been added on the rear of the west building. More detail including circular brick elements such as was on the north building were added. Mr. Hale said this, area where the trucks loaded /unloaded, would be behind a brick wall. Dick Rauh said this was a tremendous improvement from the previous development plan. John Ferrara asked about the color, "Stone Lion ". Mark Ford said it was not yellow, but a Glidden stain used wood gates on the dumpster enclosures for previous projects. It will only be used on the dumpster enclosures, not the gates themselves. Mr. Ferrara asked what the color of the stucco would be. Mr. Berry said it would be a warm buff color. The overall flavor of the center is the natural stone color, clay and putty, it is a warm -tone scheme, but very neutral scheme. Cathy Boring asked if gold colored lettering would be used in this center. Ms. Clarke said the gold lettering was part of the sign package for Perimeter Center with different sign background colors. Here, the background is standard and the letter color will vary. Mark Ford said the background of the signs would be a tan color and individual applied letters proposed would be as submitted at the meeting. The gooseneck lanterns will be the same as used at Perimeter Center. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said all the concerns raised at the previous meetings had been addressed and she appreciated it. She said it looked like a much better project than it did in May 1.995. She said a letter under her signature had been submitted to Council regarding the purchasing of the land around this area. The rate of purchase offered expires on January 1, 1997. Council has a very limited time left to make decisions about the amount of land needed for the interchange. The Commission strongly recommended that the land be purchased before the expiration because the price will raise substantially after that time period. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher understood that this issue did not impact the building of this center now. 10 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7)00 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - March 14, 1996 Page 5 Ms. Boring asked that Condition #10 be changed to reflect which landscape buffer was to be matched. Ms. Clarke said it was the Newcomb 1995 plan. Mr. Hale agreed to use the 1995 Newcomb plan. Ms. Boring asked that Condition #8 be modified to say "to be protected by sturdy fencing." Mr. Hale agreed. Mr. Ferrara made the motion to approve this development plan with the following modified 13 conditions: ' 1) That the proposed sign limitations ( one internally illuminated sign) be submitted in writing and incorporated part of the development plan approval; 2) That the proposed colors for tenant signage be submitted at the Commission meeting and be subject to approval; 3) That any and all mechanical equipment be shown in elevation on plans submitted for building permits, and that the equipment be totally screened in compliance with Code with materials harmonious with the building; 4) That the plans for development of the out parcels incorporate materials, colors, and architectural detailing consistent with the center; 5) That signage and landscaping for the out parcels be coordinated, controlled and consistent with those of the center; 6) That the parking lot lighting be designed to meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and with light fixtures of the same design to be used on all parcels; 7) That outdoor or drive- through uses be subject to further review by the Commission as conditional uses; 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected by sturdy fencing during all phases of the development; 9) That the ponds be modified with regard to freeboard to improve their appearance subject to Staff approval; 10) That the landscape plan be modified to completely conform to -the Code, and be consistent with the Avery- Muirfield landscape treatment plan (1995 plan designed by Mary Newcomb); 11) That all mounding to be used to meet screening requirements be shown on the grading plan in addition to the landscape drawings; 12) That the developer install the signal upgrade, and fund half the cost of designing and installing a signal at Perimeter Loop Road and Avery- Muirfield Drive; and 13) That the eastern entrance into the retail center be limited to right in/right out movements at a future date. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) ia- oolravoI> /roN /cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Uevelopment Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 18, 1996 (ITT Of f►UKUN 5800 %w higs Road t AUN 011430164236 IhmADO: 614/1614550 hr 614/7614506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its special meeting: 1. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Location: 25.346 acres and 3.159 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 feet south of Post Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of the preliminary plat under the provisions of Section 1103, and of the development plan under the provisions of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: Extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road to the west of Avery Road and construction of a 230,000 square foot retail center. Applicants: Lucas Land Development Go Don Casto Organization, 209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital Properties, Inc. c/o Frank T. Pandora II, 3535 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. Staff Contact: Barbara M. Clarke, Planning Director. MOTION NI: To approve this application because it meets the preliminary plat requirements, provides for all applicable traffic improvements, and complies with the Thoroughfare Plan, development text and the current roadway widening plans, with the following eight conditions: 1) That the preliminary plat include adequate right -of -way or appropriate easements to accommodate the ultimate projected widening, in accordance with the Avery interchange study currently underway; 2) That the stormwater pond design be modified to provide for less freeboard and a broader surface area; 3) That permanent provisions be made at the development plan stage for a bikepath connection through the site between Perimeter Drive and Post Road; 4) That the extension of Perimeter Drive be bonded or secured by another surety acceptable by staff; Page 1 of 2 10 -001 Z /PUP /FD l' /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 18, 1996 1. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas (Coot.) 5) That the design of Perimeter Loop Road, as it is extended beyond the retail site, be determined at a later date; 6) That Post Road access be discouraged and subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission at the time uses along Post Road uses are developed; 7) That street lighting be designed to the specifications of the City Engineer; and 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by Staff, during all phases of the development. * Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This preliminary plat was approved. MOTION X12: To table this development plan for the reasons cited in the staff report. VOTE: 4 -3. RESULT: This development plan was tabled to permit further refinement of the plan, especially regarding the western building. Several Commissioners indicated that they will not entertain further tabling of this application;'revisions should be made in line with recommendations made at the meeting. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director Page 2of2 10-00 1 Zrnne /FD11 /C1J Rezoning /Preliminary Developmem Planl Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 1 fospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 3 inventory of the urldings, and review financial statements Ms. Chinn rc uercher asked wha a time commitment � �w� a year a report was submi to the State of Ohio 5� n the students who the Zoning Commissiyrf Mr. Sutphe4Aade the motion to. seconded a motion and the vot Rauh, stain; Ms. Chinnicr H , abstain. (Approved A flake sure they have ms. Bearden said tht ch 31st. once the many studepd observing this meeting he explained to members an taff were and the purpo of the Planning and app a the January 4, 1996, eeting minutes. Mr. Fe as as follows: Mr. Pe w, yes; Mr. Sutphen, ; Mr. rcher, yes; Ms. Boring stain; Mr. Ferrara, y , and Mr. Mr. Ferrara made the otion to accept all docu ents received into the r rd and Mr. Harlan seconded the moti . The vote was as fo ws: Mr. Harlan, yes; r. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Sutphen, yes; Mr. Rau , yes; Ms. Chinnici -Zue er yes; and Ms. Boring, yes. (Appro 7 -0.) 1. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Bobbie Clarke presented this Preliminary Plat and Development Plan for a 225,000 square foot retail center located on the west side of Avery- Muirfield Drive, between US 33 and Post Road on approximately 28 acres. The property is owned by Riverside Hospital and has been zoned PCD since 1989 specifically for a shopping center. Ms. Clarke said there would be a traffic signal installed at Perimeter Loop. Both Perimeter Loop and Perimeter Drive will be extended westward into the subject site. Ms. Clarke said a low -key look existed along Avery- Muirfreld Drive with residential roof pitches and very subdued architecture. Signage is highly controlled in the area. The proposal includes two outparcels which could be used for banks, fast -food restaurants, or daycare centers, etc. The development plan for the 25 -acre site includes a major anchor, a grocery store, and several other large users over 15,000 square feet each, and minor tenants. There is a building on the west side and a building on the north side of the site. The 1989 zoning plan shows the extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road, a possible addition to the ramp at US 33, and a connection to Post Road. The preliminary plat includes the overall stormwater design, all the utilities, and all of the roads to be constructed. Ms. Clarke said the architecture included vaned materials. She said the rear elevation of the center had been upgraded and did not look typical for the back of a center. Ms. Clarke said this application was before the Commission in September, November, and December 1995, and staff recommended disapproval. Staff is now recommending approval of the preliminary plat and tabling of the development plan. The preliminary plat is an overall master plan which sets both the alignments and expectations with regards to the provision of infrastructure on the site. The development plan is a much more specific review and all of the final details of the building are addressed, the architecture, materials, signage, heights of mounds, types of landscape materials, etc. 10- 001L /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 4 Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to a number of conditions. There are copious notes on the preliminary plat and Ms. Clarke said everything that could be addressed had been. The following eight conditions are recommended: 1) That the preliminary plat include adequate right -of -way or appropriate easements to accommodate the ultimate projected widening, in accordance with the Avery interchange study currently underway; 2) That the stormwater pond design be modified to provide for less freeboard and a broader surface area; 3) That permanent provisions be made for a bikepath connection through the site to Post Road; 4) That the extension of Perimeter Drive be bonded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 5) That the design of Perimeter Loop Road, as it is extended beyond the retail site, be determined at a later date; 6) That Post Road access be discouraged and subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission at the time the Post Road uses are developed; 7) That street lighting be designed to the specifications of the City Engineer; and 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected during all phases of the development. Ms. Clarke said regarding the development plan, the Commission had previously had several concerns about the linear nature of the building. The building has not changed substantially in the last two months, but there have been upgrades to the rear of the building, particularly on the northern building. The west side of the west building had not received the same detail. Staff feels the west side of the west building will be of substantial importance as the rest of the area develops. Us. Clarke said the Staff Report includes references to the specific language within the development text for Riverside Hospital which related to the architectural expectations for the area. The buildings should have residential character, subdued colors, with elements such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, etc. to break up the mass. Blank rear facades are not permitted. The text requires that architectural elements be expressed equally (the same degree of finish) on all sides of the structure. Flat roofs are not permitted except if architecturally coordinated and specifically approved by the Commission. Ms. Clarke said in this case, in 1989, there was not a model of architecture ready to go. The text was worded, however, that the center needed to pick up a series of soft characteristics. In staff's view, while this is a good - looking center by any reasonable standard, it falls short of the requirements of the text. Staff is recommending that the development plan be tabled in order to give the opportunity to address the following six issues: 1) The design of the center is very linear and does not represent a development appropriate for a gateway into the Dublin community. Additional modification is recommended to break up the mass. 2) The requirements of the text include that all sides of all structures be equally treated with regard to design_ The side and rear elevations fail to fully reflect this. 10- 0012 /1'1) P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Usc Kroger Fuel Station 71001-lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 5 3) The issue of residential scale, especially with regard to the western building has not yet been successfully addressed. 4) Appropriate gathering spaces should be included in the center's design. 5) Signage standards reflect inadequate control. 6) Outdoor sales, as proposed to the south of the grocery store, are not permitted by the development text. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked Mitch Banchefsky to review this case for the students in the audience. Mr. Banchefsky said this site was zoned a Planned Commerce District which was a two phase process. The first phase, the Composite Plan, approved in 1989, is the actual zoning phase of the application. When the applicant is ready to develop, the Planning Commission reviews a development plan. The review is limited to determine whether the development plan as presented, complied with the composite plan, the zoning text, which has been previously approved. It is held up to the light to see if it matches. Mr. Banchefsky read the provisions of the Code. In the event there is disapproval, the reasons must be specified, and the applicant has an appeal right to City Council. Ms. Boring asked if Perimeter Loop Road as shown was final. Ms. Clarke said it was not. A note on the plat indicated that the street would be "set" only along the frontage of the shopping center. Ms. Boring asked if an option to provide for the traffic of adjoining property was left open, if necessary. Ms. Clarke said yes. John Ferrara asked about the 7 -foot freeboard of the pond. Ms. Clarke said the water level would rise by seven feet during a heavy storm. The actual standing pool of water during dry times is much smaller than the area being graded for the pond. Ms. Clarke said it was mainly an aesthetic consideration. This is a water feature which was to be a very strong visual amenity. She said there are several examples in the community where the water level was a lot lower than the adjacent street, and these are unattractive. Staff wanted the water level to be higher and for there to be less fluctuation within the pond. Joe Harian asked if the bikepath connecting to Post Road was set. Ms. Clarke said the bike path shown is temporary. There should be a convenient way for pedestrians or bikers to get from Post Road to the shopping center. The path's permanent locations, within reason, is not important. It could be relocated when the land is developed with offices. Staff believes the need for the path will be permanent. Ms. Clarke said the path would be constructed now. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, agreed to the conditions of the preliminary plat approval. He said the hospital had previously contributed $650,000 towards road infrastructure with the agreement that no further contribution would be required of the applicant. He said that they would dedicate any easements necessary back to their parking set back line for waterlines, utilities, etc. Randy Bowman said that was acceptable. Mr. Hale said the pond could be expanded behind the building. He said freeboard could be reduced to five or 5 1/2 feet. He said visually, steep banks with rip rap at the top were not attractive. He demonstrated the slope of 4:1 with of a five -foot freeboard as gradual- It was intended to be attractive. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plun/ Pinal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 6 Dave Tindale, EMH &T, said surface water would be routed into the pond. He said the 5 1/2 foot differential would represent a much flatter slope. By doing so, the area of the pond will be increased also. Mr. Hale said the pond was along the entry road. Mr. Hale said substantial revisions had been made to the development plan to protect the landmark tree. The road had been relocated and the size of the building was reduced. He said the dripline of the tree would not be disturbed in any way. An urban forester and a couple of arborist had been consulted about the tree. Mr. Hale suggested that the location of the bikepath could be determined by the Commission at development plan review. Mr. Hale asked if Condition N4 could include language saying that another permanent surety satisfactory to the Law Director would be acceptable. Mr. Hale agreed that access onto Post Road should be limited. The Presbyterian Church might use these parking lots for overflow parking. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked that the preliminary plat and development plan be separated for consideration. Dan Sutphen asked Mr. Hale if he accepted Condition //1 as listed in the Staff Report. Mr. Hale said they had right-of-way dedicated, but an easement back to the set back lines to accommodate the City's needs would be given. Mr. Sutphen asked about the amount of land it would take to build the northwest access ramp to US 33 off of Avery- Muirfield Road. He did not want to allow a shopping center to go in and later have to buy property for the ramp. He wanted to hear there was plenty of room for ODOT and Dublin to work to get a northwest bound entrance onto the freeway and allow for an exit off of to go southbound. Mr. Kindra said the URS interchange report was just received today and they had not totally examined it. Several options were examined including the loop ramps and all the previous options that had been mentioned. It seems that the situation on I -270 and SR 161 was tied with what was done on this ramp. Mr. Kindra said ODOT officials indicated that they would not approve any redesign or improvement of this ramp that would adversely impact SR 161 and I- 270. The consultant recommendation was to maintain the existing configuration of the ramps with traditional. lanes, signalization or some other changes. This is believed to be the best option which ODOT would accept. Mr. Sutphen said this was unacceptable. He would not vote for it then. He said he asked the question about the ramp at the past hearings. Mr. Hale said this had nothing to do with this application. A previous agreement had been made by Riverside Hospital gives Dublin the option to buy whatever land was necessary for the ramp 10- 001Zn>Dr /rD11/Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Devclopmcnt Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 I lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 7 at the original cost. He said until the option ends, it is difficult for the hospital to decide what will be built. Mr. Sutphen said Council should move soon, or it would not happen. Mr. Sutphen asked why it could not be decided, working with District 6. It should have been done six months ago. Mr. Foegler said City Council had never, on any capital improvement budget or otherwise authorized any.work on this project until three months ago when a study was undertaken. It examines the feasibility of various ramp improvements and configurations. He said there were numerous ways that this interchange could be addressed. When the rezoning for this property took place, the City wanted to preserve the option. If the preferred solution involved ramps on this northwest quadrant of the intersection, this developer will cooperate. The commitment was made and is preserved by virtue of this plat. Mr. Foegler said it is -totally consistent with the commitments and requirements made at the time of rezoning. He said it has not been determined that ramps at that location are the best way to solve this problem. The most comprehensive traffic study, the one for Jacob's Mall, clearly suggested that the ramps would not help that interchange. Mr. Foegler said the findings of the study would be presented soon to Council with various options. He said this would not be a Dublin decision. The existing US 33 right -of -way was acquired with federal funds and is regulated by the federal highway administration and the state. Their strict regulations must be met. Mr. Sutphen understood, but knew something other than signalization was needed. He said he knew something needed to be done now. It was unacceptable. Mr. Foegler clarified that the federal, state, and Dublin administration were working very seriously on this project. It clearly will have a very high priority with Council but it will be designed by the Federal Highway Administration. If it makes access onto I -270 easier, they will not improve it. They do not want the added traffic to get to 1 -270 sooner to relieve local congestion issues. Ms. Boring said Council had made a strong commitment to infrastructure improvements and have had to limit projects that were picked. She said they had recognized the traffic backup on this intersection and does not want another Sawmill Road and I -270. She wanted to make sure that the opportunity was not lost. She supported Mr. Sutphen. Mr. Ferrara asked if the detention pond was part of this application. Mr. Hale said no, but a detention pond was necessary with the design and location to be determined at the time of the final development plan. He said the plan indicated the proper size. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked for verification that a favorable vote with the conditions will not limit any of the options of land purchase for any interchange or other traffic decision. Mr. Foegler said no options would be limited by this plat. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if anything more than the strong suggestion to Council could be done to ensure that decisions were made within the guaranteed option period to move this forward. Mr. Banchefsky said other than a motion to Council or through the Council representative, no. It involved the expenditure of funds which is clearly a Council responsibility. 10 -001 Z/P D P /FUP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Uso. Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 8 Ms. Clarke said the option to purchase necessary land at cost expired January 1, 1997. After that date, the City still has the right to purchase the property but at market rate. Ms. Boring asked if penalties could be applied if the trees were not preserved. Mr. Hale said snowfencing would protect the trees. He said they would do a three -rail board or chainlink fence to protect the landmark tree. Mr. Banchefsky said the zoning text did not include any penalties, and there was no mechanism to provide for them. He said the tree preservation plan could be as approved by Staff. Mr. Hale agreed. Joe Harian asked if the retention pond would be fully visible at 5 112 feet. Ms. Clarke said no such plans have been prepared, and needed to be reviewed. Mr. Sutphen made a motion to approve this application .because it meets ,the preliminary plat requirements, provides for all applicable traffic improvements, and complies with the Thoroughfare Plan, development text and the current roadway widening plans, with the following eight conditions: 1) That the preliminary plat include adequate right -of -way or appropriate easements to accommodate the ultimate projected widening, in accordance with the Avery interchange study currently underway; 2) That the stormwater pond design be modified to provide for less freeboard and a broader surface area; 3) That permanent provisions be made at the development plan stage for a bikepath connection through the site between Perimeter Drive and Post Road; 4) That the extension of Perimeter Drive be bonded or secured by another surety acceptable by staff 5) That the design of Perimeter Loop Road, as it is extended beyond the retail site, be determined at a later date; 6) That Post Road access be discouraged and subject to the discretion of the Planning Commission at the time uses along Post Road uses are developed; 7) That street lighting be designed to the specifications of the City Engineer; and 8) That the landmark oak tree be protected by a sturdy, protective fence, as approved by Staff, during all phases of the development. Mr. Rauh seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) Development Plan Mr. Hale said a pond had been added at the entry. A variety of architecture had also been added to give the building interest and more of a residential scale. He said the large building, a Kroger store, had been broken up with a number of entries. Mr. Hale said a dramatic change in the rear elevations had been made and their architecture had been upgraded. There is a separate drive now. The comers have been upgraded. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Krogcr FLIeI Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 9 Mark Ford, Ford Berry Architects, said that the linear nature of the center had been changed by creating alcoves and recesses in the storefronts. He said brick, stone, and a synthetic slate roof were to be used. Copper dormers with windows, porticos, collonades, arches, and internally lit cupolas, and a focal element of the center, an octagonal feature, on the south will be used. He said the highest cave lines at the anchor stores are similar to those on large houses in Dublin. At the back of the building, the parapet height is 24 feet. Appropriate gathering spaces have been included throughout the center. Landscaping areas have been located flanking entrances to stores. A large gathering spaces is located by the water feature. Mr. Ford said they agreed to limit signage text style and construction type. They have a three page graphics criteria package. All small tenants would have a sign externally illuminated with a gooseneck light with pin mounted letters against the brick, stone, or stucco backdrop. The larger four stores as proposed, would be permitted an internally.illuminated sign. Sign color will be limited to a palette of six colors. Mr. Ford said there would be one color per tenant with no logos permitted. The tenant signage is proposed to permit the fast letter of a word to be three feet high and two -foot high lettering above the tenant storefront. Mr. Ford said the outdoor sales area proposed by the grocery store had been eliminated. Mr. Hale said outdoor sales as part of the original zoning, was not permitted. The applicant would need to file a rezoning. Mr. Ford said there are recessed docks on the back of the north building. A parapet will screen all the rooftop units. Slate has been added between the projections of the buildings. He said drawings of elevations on the west side submitted to Staff had the same detail applied. Slate was not used on the west side of the building. Landscape screening includes a mixture of evergreen and deciduous materials behind the building. Mr. Rauh said he did not have in his packet the colored westernmost building as presented at the meeting. Mr. Rauh said the west elevation as presented looked good. Mr. Rauh was concerned about the west building not matching the other elevations. He asked what was being done for gathering places on the west_ Mr. Berry said gathering spaces were located between entrances. Mr. Rauh asked if signage had been addressed appropriately. Ms. Clarke said it is still broader in terms of signs than Perimeter Center. From the centerline of Avery- Muirfield Drive, both centers should be able to compete with one another on an absolutely level playing field. At Perimeter Center, there is one sign for the major tenant, Big Bear, dial has internally illuminated lettering_ Everything else is brass, lettering on a series of sign boards which are black, navy blue, dark purple, shaded spruce, and a dark reddish - orange color called Algerian. No logos, etc. are permitted. In the Riverside center there are four major tenants and the text permits all four to have internally illuminated signs. The other signs within the center, would be one of six unidentified colors. Ms. Clarke did not feet this made an even playing field, but it was getting closer. to- ootZ /FDP /FDwcU Ruoning /Preliminary Development Plan, Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 10 Ms. Clarke said the dormers on the upper tier of the Perimeter building were permitted to be illuminated, but the lighting was to imitate candlelight. " Lit cupolas" here need to be similar. Ms. Clarke said the centers should not be identical, but have the same advantages and disadvantages in public appeal from Avery- Muirfreld Drive. More work is needed. Mr. Hale said the architecture in this center was designed to be enduring. Mr. Hale said they wanted to do more than just comply to the Sign Code as agreed upon in the text. Mr. Rauh asked if Mr. Hale agreed to work with Staff on the signage. Mr. Hale agreed. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said the signage needed to give the center its own personality, but needed to be complementary to the center across the street. She also wanted to see the rear elevations. Mr. Peplow said the east side of the west building needed work. He did not want screening to hide, but to complement what was there. Mr. Sutphen said the rear of the west elevation should be similar to the north elevation. He asked what the height of the trees shown were. Future development should not be adversely effected by the rear of the building. Mr. Harian liked the front of the building. Mr. Ferrara disagreed about the back of the building. It was a large block. Grocery store buildings usually do not have alcoves in the rear. Mr. Hale agreed that something could be done. Mr. Ferrara asked about the street signage and the entry feature. Mr. Berry said the the straight up and down sign had no appeal and he preferred the original signage. Mr. Berry said the 15 -foot high center identification sign was located off Perimeter Loop Drive. Mr. Ferrara asked about the sidewalk details shown on detail L-4 submitted.. Mr. Berry said it was plain concrete. Mr. Ferrara liked details and texture to be used on the sidewalks. Ms. Boring said if different signage rights were granted from those at Perimeter Center,'it would result in a variance application. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if Mr. Hale agreed to table this application and come back with more definitive responses to the concerns raised as well as those things verbalized that die Commission did not have. Mr. Hale said yes, and that they appreciated the input and would address the concerns. Mr. Sutphen made a motion to table this development plan and Ms. Boring seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fenara, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Rauh, no; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, no; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, no. (Tabled 4 -3.) Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said a dynamite response to the feedback received in the past five months. Mr. Rauh said he would not table this case again. Several other commissioners said these issues should have already been handled by the applicant. 10 -001 Z/PDP /FD P /CU Re /oning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CONMIMION RECORb OF ACTION DECEMBER 7 1995 "ITY OF DUBLIN ... ,,The,Planning ..and_Zoning ..Commission . took .the - following. action: at. its..,regulariy.,.scheduled meeting . 3. Prdhnina T Plat and Devdopment: Plan - BiversideBes U - Retail Subweas Location: 25.346 arras and 3.159 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 feet south of Post Road. ExistinY Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of the preliminary plat raider the provisions of Section 1103, and of the development plan under the provisions. of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: Extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road to the west of Avery Road and construction of a 230,000 square foot retail crater. Applicants: Lucas Land Development c/o Don Casto Organization, 209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital Properties, Inc. c/o. Frank T. Pandora H, 3535 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Bar W. Hale, Jr., Smith and. Hale,. 37 West Broad--Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. Staff Contact: Barbara M. Clarke, Planning Director. MOTION: To table this preliminary plat and development plan. s Ben W. Hale, Jr., requested tabling this case. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This case was tabled after much discussion. STAFF CERTIFICATION �%t t tSCUa- 01 1 . Uti 1Gc. Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director 10- 001ZrnDP /FDP /C1J Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plani Flnal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 7, 1995 Page 10 3. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Ms. Clarke said this combined preliminary plat.and development plan was tabled previously on September 21 and November 2. A shopping center of 225,000 square feet is proposed on the west side of Avery- Muirfield Drive on a site of 28.5 acres. She presented several slides of the site, surrounding Party and the proposed Pte- The' aNeCD1�iLS'a;lindmlik'Oak free; a bArn aryl SUb6t8�lal Open land.:�1}jC:SItC iS ZOnLt1 PCD :tndwllhe� Hlo, Aa1 :p1an;foaat,mraod =user.commeecW sbvelagmeoL .- tFheipiatirhas:iwo , tuparcejr*oogAve ry- Muhficid: Drive. They :,will have internal - access ronly. The revised s plan has relocated the Perimet Drive access: point westward. Tbe'landmark Wi l W'- Y�oa 'j'� ?Ti71ifGKP .::a•• a'1 ban`bee naidded,(ww;fow pmpmed):omPermoetr�Dsi &ton haft There are two carts on Perimeter Loop Road. Tbelgrocery :stomi&tD'.be;iacatetl:on -its own site, 8nd' stnC9V `iot'lmeis;shtrwu•thra<tgh;the Ofthcvommoffparking "lot. The road configurations have changed somewhat since the time of zoning. The roads will be builtvnlyn° Ax) nt of ,,the=ashoppingicenterl.na-�to; the - =W4*t PcopaitY -.slme ,;Titeataff s most e concerned - because the plat does not indicate when, and under what circumstances, , the applicant willbuild -the, balance of the two public roads, whether lbose roads are subject to furdrer adjustment as to alignment and length, and no bikepatb connection is shown to Post Road. Also access restrictions should be noted on the preliminary plat. Ms. Clarice • said the architecture of the eerier has a variety of roof lines, colors and materials .to break. up. the building. The Commission's concern about.its linear nature has not change! substantially.. Tht northern building has a stepped facade, but the western building-(which contains thc'gmcery store) not changed much. Ms. Clarice . said this is very complicated largely. because. it includes the simultaneous - ..r.�"oftbc issues ;��sach detailed issues, such as signage and tree species. 7 of road improvements, the Commission had suggests& usisW =tes-mnAGSplat::fflnulaff 'finds that oral �ajorai�sues ar simply, not adds ed;.. tc�site Pun -was redrawn to add .100 parking spaces, about 1,000 square feet of building area, a lot of landscaping and additional pedestrian amenities. The signage still does not conform to the .restrictions, at. Perimeter Center. .. Smffvis recommending disapproval because a number of the issues which -were raised still ' need to be addressed. She noted that the code does require the filing of a master plan for all developments over 50 acres; this overall site is about 117 acres. She said the bases for the staff recommends disapproval of the preliminary plat based on Abe following: 1) The preliminary plat fails to include Post Road right -of -way as indicated in the Community Plan, or include right-of- -way along Avery- Muirfield Drive consistent with the study currently underway. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 7, 1995 Page 11 2) The preliminary plat fails to provide for the possible extension of Perimeter Loop Road to the western property line, and it fails to provide for the street reconfigumdon in any substantive way due to possible freeway ramp construction. 3) the proposed preliminary plat fails to include the Cape Cod Inn site as part of the plat. This Inn site is part of the overall Riverside development, has no other street access, should be combined with the adjacent parcel through the plat, and is shown as providing most of the. land, for the potential ramp or a.planned major storm water facility, ::4) , Abe sabaoimsion a phaaingplan, for- the� neof�bt:czuaaions aof;either 3 eter -Drive or Perimeter Loop- Road. FjMmdom;Of�tcana�bnWss wtdd . be 5) .. gwpkt -.. has- ot,:addremd-ft bilmpath:meeds of.the ,2= or.ft.Community Plan. �aplatoea not?mctadat access. or Post Road. 7) No am-sections of the pmposed:roadssttysjWftimd=' Road,. and taetanieerajaiddindi3>> eautparaelsy .3rave =beentforLtaRion.Such cross:sectiona should include ,adequate treelawns, eight -foot bikepath, five -foot sidewalk in addition to pavement, curb and gutter. $) . Streetaghtittg .has,not.beenraddressed. Ms. Chdw said the staff recommended disapproval of the development plan for reasons which are different from those listed above. These are much . more detailed, architectural issues. For example, the finished floor elevation of the center is a full six feet above the elevation of Perimeter Drive, : and it is unclear how this service area will be . screened from the road. Perimeter .Drive will be an important east -west collector, and the view is important. Sigmge needs.to be.censistent on both sides of Avery- Muirfield Drive, and it is not as yet. The pedestriam amenities are not well.detailed. She said that: the staff report. is in.error:regarding - :• condidon47: below, sand a text -:was is. fact submitted by the yappli cant Also;; the developer's redesign. of_the site. plan. is. much improved regarding the landmark .oak tree. She.said. staff recommends disapproval of the development plan based on the following: 1) 'ihe design of the amter is very linear awes roc appropriate for a gateway into the Dublin community. 2) c.ne• plansizfor ,the,ncenter: do not: -' gtsding, especially , around the landmark.tree and ponds, proposed- mounding, pond elevation anti edge treatment. 3) The ....site-plan.does ,not :provide. for, adequate detail of, pedestrian .amenities within. the center or a bikepath linkage to the balance of the community. 4) The center is•designed the service ide of the .:northern +building, facing Perimeter Drive. The overall treatment of this elevation including building orientation, finished floor elevation, usage, grading, landscaping, etc. needs modification to provide for a proper view from and relationship to Perimeter Drive. 5) The landscape screening along Perimeter Drive does not appear to meet Code or the requirements of the development text or to incorporate an imaginative design consistent with an important arterial roadway. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 71001 lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 7, 1995 Page 12 6) The plan inadequately addresses the Avery- Muirfield landscape treatment, street trees, landmark tree preservation, buffering and screening. 7) No standards were submitted for development of the outparcel sites along Avery- Muirfield Drive. 8) Adequate signage information has not been submitted for review. Signage and several other development standards do not conform to the text or are not comparable to those in place at Perimeter Center immediately across Avery- Muirfield Drive. 9) Ouldoor , .saia:as , propoaod;to , the- south of- the grocerystore, - , are- not- development text. ;Mr:�s�teod,#sWe:�faff =lt�s,met with -. the: applicaat:baxuaeWe:.issue� >have�ed _ . ,Ms: -that two:moetwp� wmvheldplus several .one -convmadm. ; <. 404he!atpp) -moreaasnea =wereiresolved.- :.Shea W- dw.catnbinad btr: �• lienlJr; raeproaenting�lhc�app1icar�said -thatrhe hospitaltmdt9ts<:oonsitttanta met;with . , the. staff.-Re4eRtbe >mexingihinlring that:all of-.thc.:issues were being successfully addressed. He said another meeting was held since the staff report was issued. He said a mrmber:of changes had been or will be made. Post Road should be platted with a 30- foot right -of -way from the centerline of Post Road. The Cape Code Inn was not shown on the plat, and this has been corrected. He said a note was requested on the alignment of Perimeter Loop Road depending upon a new freeway ramp and other issues. There is still substantial disagreement on the potential extension of Perimeter Loop Road to the west property line. The hospital: is concerned about. a potential. barrier.median on Avery- Muirfield Drive. The longer that road, - the greater.the potential for a barrier median. This -would be a very big - problem to the .hospital. He.said the plat will.conforra to. the city's bikepath desires, including a temporary path. : Rethought:thatthaplat,thal: Vas -submitted addressed these issues. Mr. Hale said there were never to be any access restrictions onto Post Road for this developnieot. ;F�ocept:f� this;twd_the exLensiartpf i; � „brliexes there is substantial agreement : with - the staff. He said st�xt 3igliting^will>bc 3uclnded. a. - �r;Mr Fishman :said =he.did.,not;sae a-,lot:of�progress: -� "Hv- be The signage•.for Perimeter, Center: should be used as. a guideline. Mn Hale responded that this site has.different:sumdards for signs than>PabWer Center. He also said-the•shape•of -the center is . an ; "L ".- and: -.wilLsalvasys..ba;so_:. Mr.: F.ishman,;said .Mr. s Hale- lmaws: the: importance .of.treating _ the two.retaft identically on.the issue of.signs, and Mr. Hale represents both developers. Mr. Fishman said he cannot vote for this without staff support. He said Mr. Hale should be sensitive to the changes that have taken place since the rezoning. Mr. Hale said they spent $660,000 to improve Avery Road several years ago, and they have the right to build a shopping center. He had hoped for closure before now. He requested tabling. 9 10- 001 7/1. D 1'/B D P U Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Staumt 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes - December 7, 1995 Page 13 Mr. Zawaly said he wanted a clarification on the extension of Perimeter Loop Road. He thought it would be extended when the adjoining land is developed. He wants this reconciled. He noted that the plans in his packet were different from those being used for presentation. Mr. Hale responded that Perimeter Loop Road will have to be reconfigured if a freeway ramp is built. The hospital has never agreed to extend the road to their west property line. Mr.Tishmaumade*motimto- table' this application based on theinformationin °the:sbtf .report Ms- chinnicizuetctter seconded..the motion. 3eff.tMclntmt�:.8.8TL"property, ownets .rmmedtatdy:ea =ihe-�vest.:ror happy: to acs t °, ` : 1LeaVOoatoa :'tl>ta�motiomwas!ass�Od�ows sMr.�I?tshtaartt > "3�.:�:d Yes r �- Mr...Rauh,;yes.-'Ms. Qtimilci -ZAxzl w, ::yes;.:andI&.- 7atwalyit7es., bl ):; 4. - Memo Centex - Piodud OMce Building .1295_ .;:•�;; •::_:.,. agenda -without ton.. This is .a. Zo(=l Plan for. athree- ,90,000 square footstntc 386 acres on the soud Place South. Rubey said Metro Center ins ximately 130 acres and 80 developed. A porti of the site falls within the 100-y flood plain of the Cos Ditch. Metro Center is PUD, Planned Unit Devel District. Metro has been developed with architecwre, large set backs building materials a substantial amount of lag. Slides of the site, area and me were displayed. /ft eSaid staff has conomw;kout the site plan This to phm.repreents a °70.percent coverage. The parking the structure on four sides. Staff has the applicant either parking in excess of Code (27 parking spaces) or clop eanuQi�t< �3= -.Thc : 'caliper trees: in>front,of: Stsff.believes in . which is different fromm . rest of Metro.:Center , a. o be within the area. The: erect buitding::materiai; concrete; is a lighter slade on top and Slade o :.the.bottom:of thebuitding. tall' is_also_concerned:with::the 'on or. ow The first floor windows recessed, on the second there is ore detailing, on the top they change:again. - -Staff ants a more consistent or refined ow, for the structure. Staff is also w with the metal roof top The of that screening treatment will stronger than appropriate for this ding. S would like something more subdued 'ch could be achieved a number f ways. The th elevation incorporates a col shaped entrance design. 4 Mr. Rubey said is recommending approval of this Oplicatis° "I I -- 10 -00l Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Duel Station 7100 Hospital Drive DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION ,ITY OF DUBLIN NOVEMBER 2 1995 sseos kapw kWORtaoli liu rtYVft31V1114S50 The.,;Pianning•and;:?.oning. Co mmissio n took' it . 'IDIbwiogxactian:a4:�;:i1WtggbW choduled Wig: 2. Brel6mivary Plat and Development Plan - .Riverside Hospital PCD - .Retail Subareas Location: 25.346 acres and 3.159 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, ,approximately:600 feet south of Post Road. Existing. Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review:and approval ofthe preliminary plat under the provisions of Section 1103 and of the development plan under the provisions of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: Extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road to the west of Avery Road and construction of a 230,000 square foot retail center. Applicants: Lucas land Development c/o Don Casto Organization, .209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital .Properties, Inc. c/o Frank T. Pandora.11, 3535 Olentangy•River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. Staff Contact: Barbara M. Clarke, Planning Director MOTION: To table this preliminary plat ardent = plan : °by the applicant. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: After much discussion, this case was tabled. The Commission urged the.appHcant to further address a number of issues including design of the center, Perimeter Drive ttreatment, :.preservation :plan, for..landmark tree,.:possible :ramp to US 33, pedestrian amenities, signage, and appropriate notes on the plat. STAFF CERTIFICATION nn Barbara M. Clarke 10- 00tc /eDP/FD> /CU Planning Director Re._oning/Preliminwy Development Plan/ Final g Development Plan /Conditional Use Kro •er Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1995 Page 9 Mr, Shen asked about the erald Parkway h approv section. Ms. Clarke ted this to be replicated. \ Mr. Sutphen wants it to absolutely and consistency with the already but the plant palette has not been d and consistent. Mr. Sutphen d that the David Road boyhood also park ' m a major commercial rezoning p and got the type of b er they wanted. He 'd. he thought.this should. be com al::of so , type,and;not apartmen He thought the =R dweloprnent would_have:, :;beaLvvramg,:ami:th dents said :at that.' :that.they•did:noL: ts•either.. x-Mr�me�r :there'was moNa= -feature: °�ufr: 'tbzs^dci►doper . ° $ *`,`� eateat this a.previous hearing,.. ferably one_of- ' .size. Mr.- Hunter. ...- . , .. e_ would;work with a staff on this issue. ML ow- expwmsed conce about traffic, curbTuts, dtie-Emeraldl • landscaping. He ore than just the land need to be resolved. Ms. = Zucrcher also cowmen the residents.on ed g themselves and cipating, =She thought.. eryone needs to be earl, better plans are uilt from various in ut and compromise.: e.urged Mr..Hale.to• tinue to.negotiate..She ested a.subcommr to study these issues ' depth. Rauh said the C mission Rules and ulations require that no on be taken on any rmation that is recer less than 15 days p 'or to the meeting. may have to slo down a -bit to work t the issues. Mr. F said the appli did not present wh er any or all of the nditions were acceptab Mr. Hale sai he always tries to co mmise. He said negotiation would fruitless . :without-. tion of the Commissi He said some form multi- family could be ' uded. ..:.::The Southwest Plan;includes .non: tial :with .transi ' form, etc.. Ms. Chinnici- Zuerch made a motion to tabl & L iMri;.Sutphen seconded. The vote.was:as fella Mr..Zawaly, yes; '� _ ;:ryes;: Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici -Zuerc , yes; Mr. Rauh, y and Mr. Sutphen, y (Tabled 7 -0.) Zawaly: made .a: motion, establish a subco 'ttee to work on application. Mr. 2 F seconded: ` The su mittee is to be com of Ms. Chinni ' Zuercher, Mr, F' : and<John, Ferrara, and. of its meetings will and published, orehand. Mr a Fishman, es; Mr. Peplow, yes; Rauh, yes; Mr. Za yes; Ms. Chinnici- her, yes £ j Mr. F yes; and Mr. Sutphen, (Motion approv 7 -0.) g ro �o v :- �ob 2. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas v�o w E yq` Ms. Clarke presented this combined preliminary. plat and development plan for about 30 acre J a�..�� ° a M a. located on the west side of Avery Road. She said the property has been zoned Pm for a multi N s use commercial development for about six years. The property owner is Riverside Hospital g oao o o � o The central area is zoned for retail uses, and that is the only portion under consideration. It is Y Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1995 Page 10 the first phase for construction. Ms. Clarke said the preliminary plat and the development plan rewire separate action by the Commission. The case was heard on September 21 of this year and tabled by the Commission. Slides of the site, surrounding area and the plans were presented. Ms. Clarke compared the approved zoning plan with the current submittal. The easternmost sections :,of both. Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road sue.: to be constructed with :this ;; gag¢ �e�4o[ sz° fi�imet��oOP Roaa�irshowaar :a:cuider�2u��fmg�dmt+ca'hvmtAe :' "M� !� _:.:westcm ine,,and.the alignmentfor.Perimetes Drive w not , beyond -....: . the shoppiag center. As: proposed, neither road will not be attended to the property line, and no phasing,plan has been ,addressed byahe applicant. Ms. Clarke said the retail site is still planned as a strip center. The two outparcels on Avery- Muirfield Drive will not have .direct access onlyrany:.public street -but will use .a service road. These are two wet ponds included: at the northwest corner and at the southern entrance. The landmark oak tree is located near the Perimeter Drive entrance. She said the center is in two bukldings.and.is very linear in its.form. The center's square footage and parking have been somewhatreduced since the last hearing. The center is shown as 224;000 square feet with several anchors, the largest of which will be a grocery store of 66,000 square feet. She said the signage has been changed. The four anchors will have fairly standard internally illuminated signage. All other. tenants will haveless obtrusive, externally illuminated signs. Perimeter Center, by comparison, only has the Big Bear sign is a standard internally lit sign. Ms. Clarke said the staff has examined the preliminary plat application carefully and cannot xccommnnd approval:odue4o the :need;foradditional.information on°future road ;extensions. She said the application has not been substantially changed and staff recommends disapproval of the development plan as well. Bikoepaths have not been addressed, not any connection to the Convalarium.. The Staff believes that the landmark: tree has.construction shown all.the may around it, and it is not a good candidate for surAval.in.. this - .plan..... The,.plan eliminates the possibility of anon -ramp to US 33 through the:site. Overall, =the application-is- short- sighted, and the community needs to look further ahead toggm -forats4uhwe�wd&affic.needs: --- Ms. Clarke said the center is very .linear and is not appropriate for a gateway into the community.. The design of the. curter has its service area along Perimeter Drive, and the rear of that structure is not a proper front door for the major east -west street that Perimeter Drive will- become. The. landscaping and buffering shown on the plan, do not meet code, the development text, or match the adopted Avery- Muirfield frontage treatment. Also, the center is lacking any landscape treatment to enhance the pedestrian setting. The plan does not meet the parking code. The standards for the outparcels do not conform with the approved development text or the code. The center signage still need modification as well. She said staff must recommend disapproval of both the preliminary plan and the development plan. 10-001 zmDP /F DP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use KIOUI Purl Station 7100 1lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1995 Page 11 l Mr. Sutphen said it is premature to even hear this case without the roadway issues being settled. He especially believes the potential rump needs to be included. Bea Hale, Jr. represented the applicant. He said substantial changes have been made, including modifying the signs, adding water features, adequate tree protection for the landmark oak, dropped square footage, made the building more interesting, including its backside. He said that he and.the staff disagree on:thc process that should- be used to- resolve some of ;the issues, and theAmiAg..,:He. thinks it is inappropriate to establish roadway alignments beyond the;iimits of the rctacl rea�aow:; `1bevalignment issues -�`bel idealtwith-bler; c said'Hte haspitai *had , thought the .property.sale.at cost deal had already expired, but it is in force until 1997.' Mr. Hale said he is entitled to file an amended preliminary plan whenever the applicant so. desires. He<aaid Dublin :may_. onstruct.• a; barrier median!.; along, AxeFy�l�aarfielrk Rried , aCmss the Perimeter Loop Road intersection, effectively :blocking.their.southern enhance.:: 'his would be terrible for the hospital development. He said the property owner to the west wants the point that Perimeter Drive will intersect the west property line. He does not want to set any alignment beyond the limits of this retail development. He does not want to make a commitment as to size and, location of any pond for the future phases. He does feels this should be done if and when those phases develop. He said the projeex.has been criticized because it is not just like Perimeter Center. He said the Riverside and the Perimeter zonings were done separately. This is compatible with Perimeter and a good approach, but it is not subject to the same standards. Mark Ford, Ford Beery Architects, presented the architectural details and changes in the project. He noted the addition of the ponds, and that the driveway had moved to save the landmark tree. He said pedestrian amenities were addressed at the pond. He said that they have agreed to build the road. asfivezJanes. width to:the west property line -of the center. There willbe- low walls at each of the entrances. He said the: gmcery.store,has.gottea: smaller, and.both overall_buildings: are .now shorter. He said this center is about 600 feet long, and psis about?,;Tflfln:€a #M. - -Hw said their storefront system has been used to move, the l idlding:front:in AndouL does not trees in.front of the center and - suggested than ty a"fresult of their trees. He made comparison between the signage proposed and that at the Singsdale Center. The grocery and other anchors tenants next to have internally lit signs, and he described it as "a market necessity." He showed the front and rear elevations and several perspectives with landscaping overlays. The same materials are used on both. The rear also has tower elements. Awnings will be used also. He said they have not put storefronts facing Perimeter Drive, but the building will have the "storefront treatment" for the first 65 feet along its backside. Mr. Ford said the landscaping includes 4 -5 foot mounding and materials that are installed in groups of threes. He showed the pedestrian amenities around the landmark tree. Mr. Hale said the tree was shown incorrectly on the plan. Mr. Sutphen said the developer was not being adequately sensitive to the tree. He suggested that the major road ' 10 -001 Z /PD P /FDP /C U Re:.oning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Usc Kroger FIICI Station 7 106 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1995 Page 12 l tree. He felt this was asked at the last hearing, and the applicant should have been better J prepared. Lack of preparation was inconveniencing everyone else on the Commission's agenda. Mr. Reeds, of Myers- Schmallenberger, a landscape architectural firm, said a landmark tree is best protected by appropriate construction practices. Mr.. Ferrara said:sluinking the center by 6,000 square feet did not seem to- address the issues. He felt Mr. Hale had a.point regarding the preliminary plat, The construction .practices .;areea w an issue:for;treeprotection. Mr. Fishman said comparisons between retailers on both sides of a street come up often, and are: sometime s - raised by Mr.-Hale:.or:his. clients.-,. Heaaid signago -was;arvery.wntentiousissue -: at Perimetcr,rand four conventional plastic signs will -be:an issue. He would like this to be as nice as the Perimeter Center. Mr. Hale said treating the rear of the center is being done in a manner similar to the Toys 'R' UsMds 'R' Us west elevation. He said they have made big progress on the building, but there are still big platting issues with the plat. Mr. Zawaly said that platting Perimeter Loop Road beyond the site did not seem reasonable to him. He saw some good faith effort to resolve the issues since the last meeting. He finds repeated tabling frustrating also. Mr. Hale said the engineers report on the US 33 interchange and Avery- Muirfield Drive should be submitted soon. Mr.. Sutphen thought a;.simple on-ramp to US 33 was absolutely wrong and very shortsighted. He feels a cloverleaf will be needed eventually. Because this site is currently vacant, the city o is not handicapped, as it the case in the southwest quadrant. Mr. Kindra said that the city is W contemplating a ;barrier median at .Perimeter Loop: Road. He said the city does have the right to consider such anoption.in the future ifa:safety problem arises. W. Kindra said the study underway.is not a::majorzs ,-but it: -m.m preliminary assessment. There will be more studies later. Mr. Sutphen said the city needs to get such studies completed quickly, not wait till its too late. He said he believes ramps will be needed. Mr. Kindra said the study has to be able to be implemented, and it is being so designed. Mr. Rauh said he was concerned about the traffic improvements needed, especially a cloverleaf, but understood the developer's position regarding platting. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher could not understand why the study had not been completed some time (years) ago. to- ootz /PDP/rut> /cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Developnwnt Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 1iospital Drive Dublin planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 1995 Page 13 Mr. Foegler responded that the study would determine the specific improvements were needed between Shier -Rings Road and Post Road, including the interconnecting roadways. He said the level of service can be expected to drop significantly in the near future. Council has preliminarily funded for 1996 a traffic signal at the unsignalized ramp and improvements to the Shier -Rings Road intersection. He said the previous study did not recommend a cloverleaf but merely an on -ramp. The Raymond Keyes (Jacobs' Mall) study said it was not needed. This study will balance the conflicting reports to date. t �Mr lar:Wd- the;Emeraid�l overpass is�funded in`the five =year CIP. , !Ue Avery' MuirfieJd- overpass .is not.. The Avery interchange will probably need improvement within five years, but Dublin is seeking state and/or federal funding. In order to add it to the CIP, a > preferredimp rmovement.thatAMstawwill accept ,:needs::ta:baidentified. �Vithimtwo. the preferred alternative should be known. Ms. Chromic - Zuercher said,that the. d&,ens uniformly complgwdmt°thei ure often lags behind the development. For the Commission to make a good decision on this application, the city needs to produce more information. The study underway is tardy. Mr. Hale - reminded the Commission that the Avery Road frontage was improved following the passage of the rezoning, and Riverside Hospital was a one -third contributor to that. Ms. Clarke said that approval of a preliminary plat sets forward exactly what improvements a land owner is required to do. Those things not mentioned are legally not required. She felt that it is reasonable to conclude that further improvements, beyond those shown on the preliminary plat, are needed to provide an adequate level of service. The retail center is the most intensive part of the Riverside PCD plan, and the development of it should tie down. the improvements by the developer. Mr. Hale disagreed. However, he said his client fully expects to continue roadways westward at some future.point. Also,. if the city requires any sort of freeway ramp, Perimeter Loop Road is in the wrong place. He will work with the city. Mr. Zawaly suggested putting -notes on the Loop, etc. Ms. Clarke said notes have been discussed, but none have been proposed to date. Mr. Rauh: restated that the center turns its back on Perimeter Drive and suggested relocating the - northern entry farther to the northwest. The diagonal emphasis of the zoning plan might - be considered, removing the northwest entrance. The entry could be more dramatic. Mr. Ford said the keeping the service areas screened from all major views was a challenge. Also a convention "L" shaped center puts the major part of the building, the apex, where the least amount of parking is located. Mr. Rauh said the building had come a long way. He thought the plat issues would be more difficult to resolve. 10- 001Z /PDP /l /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plea/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 1- lospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - November 2, 199 Page 14 Mr. Ferrara said the residual parcels do not get a good view of the center either. Especially the parcel left to the west of the building (behind) would be very difficult to develop. He suggested that the design team consider a different shape for the center. Mr. Ford said the land is zoned for 10,000 square feet per acre, and the proposal is under that. Their site is 25 acres, but providing enough parking for the structure is tough. Mr. Foegler .said. the. staff ,will work with the developer on appropriate plat notes and - ;:;s +c�mnritmadr t. hee me Fis not�-to efiminate <the aeVelopet's- ibility and address thy' "µ f responsibility issues and what determines the location of extensions, etc., and we will work on such language. Mr. Hale asked for the application to be tabled. Mr. Zawaly, acked..for. some: traffic,impact information:-.11c related°.weing°thwoverpass backal- up_past Post Road on one occasion, and he is concerned. Mr. Sutphen said the area to the south and west will have the highest growth now and in the future. Staff said traffic information will not be available for the next meeting. E R] Mr. Foegler said the Tuttle Mall and other expected development will have an impact here and elsewhere. That is the reason that Council is taking the lead in getting a study underway, rather than waiting for the state to do so. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher moved to table the application. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; W. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici Zuercher, and Mr. Zawaly, yes. (Tabled 7 -0.) The Chair called for a brief recess. 3. Final Plat - HaAls Nest - Section 1, [ application was r ved from the agenda-p <dv the r e & pmPeny is were notified by 'o f the postponanent. There was no discussi or vote taken. 4. Zo Code Amendment Signs Tom Rubey 'd at the October 5, 5 mating, the Co on approved the majori f the sign code \Irish ight's disc is limited to sipage special events. The c es include defininity events, suc a school play, and events are those suppo by Dublin, suc Festival. -site promotional signs be limited to one per event. Commts may have up to directional signs to be . stalled by the city. All of these signs approved by the Events office. promoters would be responsible for of removal. 10 -00I Z /PUP /FDP /CE Mr. Zawaly asked if these eluded events that a tax sUpporte Rczoning/Prehminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional USC Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive ITY OF DUBLIN 3100 SYr 4 tad llit AN430H42M fcc 614/W14%6 1 1 I 1 1VZ-j W-WCX II WA J IJU SNUI PXC0 OF AMON W MWER 21 1"5 :: - YTlc:- ;1?Jasningamd��ai��Qo�ioa took! the< follogviug< a+eEia�catatsaapera�ltmelmhag:: ' 3. PrelhnlnaryPlat and 'bubareas Lopitionp;..25s346r' ac�ea: swrd ;3 :159 acaes,located :om the; west `side 'of A Ytry;Road approximaWy x,600 fed south of Past Road. •-:ExIstinS,Zoning :.- PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request:;.l eVjw.and<approW o£.tberprdhgnary:plat..under the,provisions,of•Seedon 1'103 and of the development plan under the provisions of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: Extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road to the west of Avery Road and construction of a 230,000 square foot retail center. Applicants: Lucas Land Development c/o Don Casto Organization, 209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital Properties, Inc. c/o Frank T. Pandora 11, 3535 =Olentangy Give r. Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Ben W Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. Stgff Contact: , ;Barbama:iof: •Clarke, Planning Director MOTION: To table this preliminary plat and development plan. VOTE: 5-0-1. .RESULT: This, preliminary .plat.:.and developnmttt plani:4vu lod-:as misted° by the applicant to permit.the following issues to be addressed: 1) That the preliminary storm water master plan .be modified to indicate committed pond .designs, , not theoretical pond areas; 2) That the. City:Engineer and: the applicant's .traffic engineers come to consensus on what level of traffic improvements are necessary for this development and provide recommendations for roadway improvements, including left turn storage lengths, location of driveways, and recommendations for traffic signal improvements and lane assignments at intersections; Page 1 of 2 lo - ootzrnoP /rul' /cu Re /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Usc Kroger fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive SPECIAL MEETING DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION SEPTEMBER 21 1995 3. prelhnivary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas (Cont.) r . } ,= l;oop;RoadAftough this "an the adjacent pmpert3', g.phsinB Plan for 4) t T { � h y � � t'acrblwcwre for;.th be determined::and coordinated.withbe center; $) °Thtrt`•ognage'tr�►tmart {JG resolved 6) That. p oper. meaning of the service area: and; views,.along the :streets be better inoogx0ted into the design; Jlmtsthe des►igmof =tbe eenter;include pedestrian amenities and appear less Him a conven tiond Irshaped shopping center; and 8) That the plan include provisions for a pedestrian and bikeway system. STAFF CERTIFICATION yy`I Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director Page 2 of 2 10 -0012 /PDP /PDP /CU Rczoninn�Preliminary Devclopment Plan/ Pinal I Development Plan /Conditional Use i<rogcr PUeI Station 7100 Hospital Drive D plarming and Zoning Commission hfi - September 21, 1995 Page 2 CASE 3: WdkdU" PIRt and Development Plan - Riverside H PCD - Re Subareas Bobble Clarke presente t h n cast w h ic h was c arried forward from the September 7, 1995 4989. �..T*,plwc&Ue& g-SX-33 a retail. center, In d of the siteAnd. ftty-�acres,at,thtnordiern,. fiWilifie"Joa '.4-Y S., e��:1016111 Aiw*aing � p ,acres. -T h xs ,, access f rOm.: b o thp er imdW Drive, aud,Perimeter-Loop,.both ofwhichmill I oak-tree -in the venter of this .&,.exten&&,tD,ft, Roadi Ilwm is a4ar9w IndmIfk ..3ite,along,ttwPedmeter-DrWt&UpnienL IU-hoq*d U �i ft...ue;d property and extending over �to.reoonned *th % , Road needs to be addressed. Perimetet D&CIS to carry most Of the east norl-frOeway traffic to relieve Post Road from the new trips coming from new development. Many of the sum restrictions placed on Perimeter Center were adopted for this site. The outparcels,will.not access to Avery-Muirfield Drive. At the dw of zoning the :& U pnmn t a W.point-of.emneedonwith-postRoad-wemundeUmninod. Aculdesacwas W&III it might . set . vice pro I per ty to the west. Iliat was not determined at the rezoning either. It was deferred to the preliminary plat. Ms.- Clarke said another-issue then was the posAWIftY-Mf**wway"mV*r=qftound Avery hafft to head westbound on US 33. Currmdy.psltxwAdound�aocm-,meqnhW::a left - turn, w hi c h i t interferes, with.Axery's north/ addressed shortlyisengineeringdesiMfor US11 interchange improvements. - 'Me Avery Road bridge is the Ochole point now. Ms..Clarke. said obviously, that� overpass had-implications for new freeway ramps which is an Lnue staff will continue to study. Ile service side of the northerly retailbuilding; proposed faces Perimeter Drive. The staff has r �. -.been-veryvoncernod about theMew for moving cast/west traffic. reported that all the ponds can be made wet or dry, depending upon what seemed to make the most serm in that particular location. Because staff feels these are areas that need to be heavily screened, if the pond is invisible, it probably should be a dry water feature. If that is a possibility, staff has asked the applicant to identify correct sites where they would provide good drainage as well as good aesthetics for the overall development of the site. 40 Mr. Sutphen asked that the landmark oak tree be located on the slide 1 0-00 1 Z/PDP/FDP/CU lZ DOV0101),11clit PkIlly Fillal Developmelit Plan/Conditionai Use K loger FUCI slatioll 7 100 I-Iospital Di ive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 21, 1995 Page 3 be close to the alignment of Perimeter Drive, but actually it is on the site, probably in the middle of the driveway. Ms. CbWw said the rear elevations indicated that the building would have above standard, good looking rear side. The applicant has agreed to do some shifting on the site to avoid the tree. She said the proposal was to build one section of Perimeter Loop and then to build Perimeter Drive just beyond the second driveway, not to the limits of the project. ,. �. Stagf,does:not�w=t>t9; caught.upim,4 tail,inm,.ivxh:m brick whatever could to`tha:applicxnt parrying. +cost sine 1989: and; that agreeu would, pay the:fair,.madot: value ;for.lbe the city ae. The conditions of:appmval as passed:by Ahe Commission should have amcaded thaYtext to change the.date.toianuary,.l,. 199,7..: Unfortunately,: the. paperwork :never..induded:thepvoperdate. The texd.should read January 1,.1997, = -April 1, 1994. She said Dublin currently updating the .<.Communitypian�aM willhmmartm -Awl man looking at theitnaffic needs1or-theoverall City, including the.need for a new ramp on this site. Staff has informed the developer that the plan appears to be a very linear. The community has a real need for congregation -type spaces and pedestrian amenities. This was discussed during the Perimeter Center rezoning from a mall to a open-air strip center. The devloper should design spaces dtat.would be special, invisitmg to the public, and would actually get used, on the vaerior of the building. Ms. Clarke said this center is predominately brick anchored by a large grocery'store. Staff is is, supportive .of..the features. All of the sigoage on the Perimeter Center siteis very,subdued: and hiasA pedestrian oriented village feel --both the architecture and all the day dnwn •rn-thc:trim)af the °lieht -mats and: fronts of .the:sbops :., nat:siMe -pocla p permI Anl v iasac s+gn for Big Bear.. All other signage on the site wilt nayrdark colored:phaques:;'. Staff°wouldfdmboth sides of theVred b .imleetthetseme tivity aril feel, without copying everything done at the Perimeter Center site. _Staf !- , this applicatipn.be tabled;:;but feels ilia ir important point in<the overall staging of.the process for -the Commission to have input to the developer. The following issues need to be addressed further by the developer. 1) That the preliminary storm water master plan be modified to indicate committed pond designs, not theoretical bond areas; 2) . That the City Engineer and the applicant's traffic engineers come to consensus on what level of traffic improvements are necessary for this development and to provide recommadations for roadway improvements, including M turn storage lengths, location of driveways, and recommendations for traffic signal improv -^�"'•° 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU I Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final I Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 21, 1995 Page 4 at intersections; 3) That consensus is reached on the proper extension and alignment of Perimeter Drive and Peimeter Loop Road through this and the adjacent property, including pig plan for roadway construction; 4) That architect= for the outparals be determined and coordinated with the center; 5) That 3ignage treatment be resolved; 6); <.:That acxeaung of �aurvice area and views along the .public streets be better incotporated into the design; ^ center* xhW crmore.Tedestrian - ameaitie3.and fleWHI a cowm ntiowl :L- 3ha4ed.9wpping center and ai :::: ;be4gan:•inchxl ,provisimt. or,a.. pedestrian and bi3oevvay system. 01 ,.. .1 t. 1. u un . - i 1wn.1 gILr ✓V' a "' - ryl. 1.1.1 1. IY I..IIv - eta.. lil 4 11 �. .11 11 t• W 'a 01 t% t' . 1.-• 1: U y1•I' b11,.11 i ilia r-' P 11 .. 1 r ✓. b' 1 V Mr. Ferrara:asked:if this .development had a identifying name. Ms. Clarke said no. Ben -Hale, Jr:., 37 West 'Broad . Street, Columbus, Ohio, representing the Don M. Casto Organizadan;;aad= nym odngs: had; been. held: withStaff. .:Mw aerially, and they know it must be preserved. Mr. Hale said they were following the basic layout of the 1989 zoning. They want to be compatible with the center across the street. Many i .changes have: ban made in. response to Staffs concerns. Mark Ford, .. Ford;Eeery:Architects, Inc., reviewed the site plan and concept. He said the site plan indudmz, large. .anchor, :&grocery -store, which is positioned in the southern quadrant of boundary, to: the. residual Riverside Hospital properties. The two outlots indicated on Avery Road will be,compatable ;with :the.architecwre.and materials iof_&CL main Structure. They are allowed_ one .oenter.identification.sign.. along AveryMuirfield Drive. Mr. Ford said the.main thmughfam through,the,siteds,off:af A south, which will bisect the site with the major field of parking " '%U&ors,,20,OW to 30, OW3gUanCfedv will.be located�on`: the. north; side. "F.acb'outlot�is approxi rately1.6acres. W. Ford said then will be a combination of stone and brick. To address the comments of the linear:nabnrey the - havp. ,lltol)ush? ft foaprint.in-=d out: The <storefrontshave'beenpulled° in and out within. the overall geometry. They also have changed the massing along that long storefront-in. orda.-.to create devational, material, roof pitch, and storefront changes. Within the canopy, the repetitive theme element is the tower with flat arches. Lanterns on top of the small hipped -roof towers are also used. When walking down the promenade there will be spaces where the seeds will be raised, the ceiling heights will go up, and in some locations the store front actually will go out to the front of the towers so that you cannot pass through them. You will have to go out into the sidewalk, or they will have plantings and benches. This is not depicted on the overall site plan presented to the Commission. They are proposinz canvas awnings in specific locations throughout the center. The awnings P 10 -001 Z. /PD P /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 21, 1995 Page 5 4) as signage, they are primarily to give a more pedestrian breakdown of the scale. They am using more residential scale elements such as the smaller pare windows, the large focal tower, and the way the storefront is depicted underneath the canopy. The grocery will be 75,000 square feet. By using different hip roofs, entrance features, etc., an overlaid_ appearance will be created that it is not a blank wall. Tuskan columns throughout the center. will be at 20 foot intervals through the canopy area. .r ill.••. y � 44.: Mr._.:F.ordt.,presented: exterior material samples to the Commission which included. the maaufia;4>cedzLaroo4gray, slate, -:f m fmb&-awAings swlecdms to be—ed in,gmps, brick, and the. nwActured buff _colored..Old-Ohio limestone. . He .said, the,. storefronts would .be of aluminum:�.-He showed trimoolmthathad been selectedand:a forthetuAda columns, .Thesynthetia�stone:parapet in- the rear will be raised to screen the rooftop equipment. Mr. Hale said they will try to make an area around the landmark tree where pedestrians can 1 0 congregate and sit. Dave Tyndall; EMH&r Eagineers said the storm water moves from south to north. There are three drainage outlets on the site. A .wet pond will be provided in the northwest corner. The ...- �.; Riverside�EGoapatal :site�wilLatlslrass:ita�o�rrt storm•: watrx�drainage :at�the >timewfdevelapaeat. ;,. . „.� Storm water is a concen and they, without further study cannot consider anything but conceptual basins in location, shape, and size. ;Mr:: Hale aaid.as: the °sitev:comen for nwiew ty to the office building and they would be handled then. -Mr. Hale said ft, text:stated Perimeter.Drivewould transition from a-fivo -lane to a three -lane road (36- foot). He said staff has asked it to transition farther to the west, and he agrees to do that. He said the property owner {Lane) to the west wants the Perimeter alignment set. Mr. .;:Hale;:said,*Adidonal:. Avery- Road::studies:are:being.:made by them. When:Avery Rand was widened, - Riverside Hospital and• the Perimeter Center developer contributed $650,000. The agreement then was if there were future improvements needed, they will be the City's responsibility, not the developers. Mr. Hale thinks the way the ponds are proposed is correct. They cannot be combined into one. If the ramp is constructed at the southeast corner, then the pond will be there. The applicant sees the pond with fountains, etc. and part of an amenity with possibly seating around it with the tree worked into the area. He mentioned bike racks. Mr. Hale said they knew there were more issues to address. 10- oolZ /PDI)/ DP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive ,_ , .:..,St:baa•�;>�cstrthaob#ed .. _ .. s :It;iaalse.davelclpr�,�ih�e, `- focalgdeoeon,thecast;ead -of the oeathr willmarrt +domiamts+loeatr. and a beacon for it. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Mmutes - September 21, 1995 Page 6 Mr. Hale said the engineer asked them to take the five -lane section beyond the second drive and they agreed to do so. Mr. Hale said the rear of the center and how it is landscaped also are issues they am working on to addressing. He said they will do an A+ job them. Mr..Peplow <asked thesmallest retail user size was. Mr. 71ndell said it was 1,200 square feet and they were predominately on the north. ,. Mr.; SuVhen,,mggested,a- bike,•:path> was needed,:even if temporary,. to..:connax thl::.reirement home and other residents. _Mr.: Sutph=gointedoA dWAhels Brma's :restaurant.. W,-Hde said and MrAutphen: wanted:. all the hues• resolved prior the case being•:heard: °again. He said the _ :.center. did: not -have.to:be..differeatamhitecWm from.:that,of Perimeter Canter. Hewanted this center to look as good. He said the rear elevation needed more work and would not accept .nything -oa �.norO o , p therithanerhaps �ugnesses with �partiaFwalkthma•.or aleyvatio�ts that a looked like a streetscape. It will. face office and a wall of evergreen trees will not screen it well enough. Mr. Hale said they had considered turning the architecture around the corner. Mr. Sutphen said reducing the road from five lanes to three lanes on this property should not be donebxawethe,siteis not fully developed out to the neat freeway exit. Ithas always been his. thought that road will carry: the traffic out to the next freeway exit. Mr. Fishman;sald this:davelopment. had, to.be at.leastm, good, or better. than: Perimeter Center. He said-the -signage was important, it had to be at least as mute as those at Perimeter Center. He said the .bike path to the convalescent center is important. He said the architect had done a good job on the elevations, but the shape of the buildings need to be broken up. It is too .,linear.:: Mr:�--Fishmaw.wanted:a water feature. <cHegsaid ',backrsbould be creatively used as water features. Mr. Eerraras.said. - : the,: City:: had eanobligation. .to let fte ap c ant•know-what-is- vxpeeted ?at US 33 /SR 161- becauseitwill impact the design. He said he thought the City had an obligation to the extension of Perimeter, and Mr. Hale's obligation back was to let the City know what mechanism will trigger;z,K•e ytbing. He•agreedat should -be constricted: f lly.as�five:lanm He said ,what had been proposed .made no sense. The. City , should: have 'better .feedback.about the - bridge - going across US 33. He asked if the study of it was on the Five -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Randy Bowman said the Coffman Road overpass was on the Five -year CIP, but not this bridge. Staff will evaluate which bridge structure was needed first. Mr. Ferrara said the walkway between the Convalarium needed to be constructed early because residents will be both customers and employees. The linear elevations should be broken up and improved. 10 -001 Z /PD P /PDP /CU Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger P'uel Station 7100 Hospaal Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission bfmutes - September 21, 1995 Page 7 Mr. Rauh said it was important that the architecture as seen from Avery- Muirfield Road did not appear so linear. He said the center seemed very auto-friendly, but it was not pedestrian - friendly. Perhaps some of the smaller stores could be grouped together. He suggested that some of the straight buildings around the parking area could be pulled out 40 feet so the driving lane actually curves. - (&.;Rauh aaloed which: way the offices off of Poet Road .would front. Mr Bale said -they would deafly bw Perim Drive. He.did not consider offrcebuRdings. as having fmatta:or backs. access, and the neighbor's view. Mr.:Fishman saW.staff -bad. done. an - e t ob dhcaflinigg *re- isweaz:AJk,4w=tod.water ...:. had'` learned +from .the ,Perimeter: Center °eupedom to do :it right the fast time. Mr. Ferrara.said the:center should have-a more,: welcoming, friendlier feeling as proposed. Mr..Sutphen was. concxnxd.about.trafk...He: said. the: road: going; north.and- ,whem.,it intersects into- PostiRoad should beidentified. He said a lot of traffic will come from Plain City. Ms. Chmnid- Zuercher asked how many stores would be in the north building. Mr. Berry said 40 ,there wouldprobably be 20-25 stores. There would be smaller users; 60 and 80 foot depths, along the. frontage, a potential.mini anchor of 15, 000 square feet, and then small er stores. The 20 -foot bays.:might be combined into two or three groups where a:tenant: may take 3,600.or 4,800:square. feet. The:leasing module could.be 20 feet. Ms.:Chinnici- Zuercher;said - 25,000 , square lD*store °would ,totally change the character. Better knowledge was now needed of the .:.tenant:spacebecawseo£ the change .in Mr.Hale:saidthe.buiidingwould not change with the size of tenant space. They will try to vary the store sizes so it feels like a walking:-street, :not ftlypical; strip.: Ms. -Chitutialr?at ten ted did not let her visualize that. , Mr„Fishman asiwd- what the, size of Pgrinug=, Cwter- was :Ms Cbdm esdMateddt atriso,000 square.feet... Mr.. Frshman said this-center is larger. Mr. Hale said Perimeter Center was over 300,000 square feet in phases over 35 acres. Ms. Clarke said it started out as a 35 acre site, but.. office- flex..was_approved.for: the backside of:it. Approximately- half-.the.acwage' was removed.from the retail component. Mr. Fishman said this needed to be really creative. Mr. Hale thought it was smaller then Perimeter Center. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher believed many shoppers would come. from the south residential community, not using US 33. The way the north area is addressed in the larger scope really needs to be the entry point. The Northwest Presbyterian Church and the school with residential uses north will be there. Mr. Hale understood. Mr. Rauh said the tower rendering appeared that there was a 1 %..f C-- —° +I — 10 -001 Z /PDP /PD P/C U Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 21, 1995 Page 8 direction, the tower disappeared. He said the massing was a Joey. Mr. Rauh asked for a photograph of the tuscan columns. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher made the motion that this p 4munary plat and development plan be tabled as requested by the applicant to permit the following issues to be addressed: 1): That -,the pseliminary_storm water. master:.plan.be modified to %indic ate committed pond _. design,. not theoretical pond areas; ]avd 'of_:_traft : improvomrnta....are.:.ne<xasary : for. ,this , davaiopment.:_and. pr°ti°de _.ofiddveway&,AW,: recommendations for traffic signal impmvemeatsand 'lane - assignments at intersections; 9 1 4)' 7) j 8) , mmft Loop;Road:through:t d and thaw. plan for . roadway construction; That architecture, for the outparcels be determined and coordinated with the center, That sigaage treatment be resolved; Flat`jpr4owtscroening service area and views along the public streeb be 'better' incorporated into the design; That the design of the center. include more pedestrian amenities and appear less like a conventional Lshaped shopping center, and That the plan include provisions for a pedestrian and bikeway system. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: , Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes;; Mr: •:Sutphen,: yes;.. Mr. Rauh, yes; . Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, .yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (rabied 6-0.) Mr. Rauh called a five- minute recess. to -oo1Z /PUP /rDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plain/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive CITY (W W MYN 5800 Shier Rings Road Oublin, OH 43016 -1236 Phone/1DD: 614/761 -6550 Fax: 614/761 -6506 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION SEPTEMBER 7 1995 The Planning and Zoning Commission took no action on the following case at its regular meeting: 7. Preliminary Plat and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Location: 25.346 acres and 3.159 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately ±600 feet south of Post Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Riverside Hospital Plan). Request: Review and approval of the preliminary plat under the provisions of Section 1103 and of the development plan under the provisions of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: Extension of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road to the west of Avery Road and construction of a 230,000 square foot retail center. Applicants: Lucas Land Development c/o Don Casto Organization, 209 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and Hospital Properties, Inc. c/o Frank T. Pandora II, 3535 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214 represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 -4199. Staff Contact: Barbara M. Clarke, Planning Director RESULT: Due to the late hour, this case was postponed until a special meeting scheduled for September 21, 1995. STAFF CERTIFICATION i xdo - Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director 10 -001 Z /PD P /rD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Puel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 1995 Page 23 Mr. Zawalypad that was still within a sidential area and the b s should be kept out e ' ely, stored els here, and the visitors [fled to the site. M waly made the moti to table this final dev open t plan to permit e applicant to ddress alternative ac -es cenarios, bus traffic an irculation, and the pro ed use of cultured etnne nn the huilrlinc Mr_ Fishman second a motion and the vot as as follows: Mr. NA Mr. Za y read that the main rpose of the master p for Muirfield Villag as "That ecol el conscious planni will create a quiet, par a environment t t em., a the lifestyle o is residents and prese the aesthetic beauty of e tranquil terrain." Th' statement should provide guidance. S. Concept PI Rezoning Applicatio 95 -015 - Muirfeld V' age, Phase 45 / 6. Pre' ary Plat - Westbury ormerly Starkey pro yon Brand Road) 7. Preliminary Plan and Development Plan - Riverside Hospital PCD - Retail Subareas Due to the late hour, these three cases were postponed without discussion or vote until a special meeting scheduled for September 21, 1995. The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Libby Farley Planning Division Secretary 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /Cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AlinUles of Dublin City Council Meeti AI eet i I It National Graphics Corp., Cols.. O. Form No. Held March 6, 1989 19 Page Two Mr. Be pointed out that t 25% requirement is ound in another pl cE in th wm andscape Code so t the requirement w 1d apply to any st ctui Mr Sutphen and Mayor R anski agreed that t ey did not feel th anyone ould add just 24% t an existing buildin in order not to be equired tc re- landscape. Mayor Rozanski xpressed his :a p pr ec' tion to members of e Tree and Landscape Ad sory Commissionst f and Mr. Amorose r the time and effort ex nded on this ordin e. Vote o the Ordinance - Ms. curer, yes; Mr. Ja owski, yes; Mrs. K' g, yes• r. Sutphen, yes; M .. Strip, yes; Mayor ozanski, yes; Mr. orose, Ordinance No. 26 -88 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on 120.533 Acres Located on the Southwest Corner of Post Road and Avery Road Third Reading. Ms. Maurer asked if there were any conditions or issues that had been lef unresolved. Mr. Bowman said that he believed that the conditions that were required were to be developed and fulfilled at the time of preliminary platting or at the time of actual development review. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Or/de No. 112 -88 - Ordi nce Providing for Change of Zoning on 14res Located on t North Side of Mar n Road, West of Sa ill R ird Reading. Mrs. King asked if ere are similar re nings that are as nse in other places in Dublin approximately 12 u its to the acre). Mr. Bowman s 'd that St. Andrew's s probably 14 unit per acre; Dublin Village is units per acre; A erton is 6 units pe acre. Vote o the Ordinance - May Rozanski, yes; Mr Strip, yes; Mr. Amo ose, yes; r. Sutphen, yes; Mr . King, yes; Mr. Ja owski, yes; Ms. Ma er, ye . Ordinance No. 20- - Ordinance Autho 'zing rho F - Maintenance Ser ce Complex. First eadin 10- 0012 /PDP /h DP /CU Mr. Sutphen i ntroduced the Ordi nce. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan / final Development Plan /Conditional Use Mr. Amor se moved to do away ith the thre Kroger fuel Station as an mergency. 7100 Hospital Dnvc Mr. .utphen seconded the otion. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS M of Dublin City Council Meeting )feeling hM200— Naliowl Graphics Corp. Cols.. 0 corm No. 1097<g acid February 21, 1989 Page Two 19 Mr. Bowman had the following comments regarding the application for rezoning: 1. The process for this Riverside Hospital rezoning request has involved approximately one year's time on the part of the applicant and the Dublin City Planning Staff. 2. Staff believes that this is a good zoning package; complete with appropriate and desirable land uses. 3. The site is almost 120 acres. Except for the former Cape Cod Inn site of approximately six acres which is zoned Community Commercial, the remainder of the site is presently zoned R— rural. 4. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to the Planned Commerce District. 5. The development includes office and institution on approximately 27 acres, retail uses on another 27 acres, and a hospital, medical offices and hotel on approximately 46 acres. 6. It will be a phased complex. 7. Riverside Hospital intends to maintain architectural control over the entire site, as well as all the development standards. 8. There is to be the same landscape buffer treatment along Post Road and Avery Road as to be employed as part of the Perimeter Center rezoning passed a few weeks ago. 9. The proposed roadway network will be compatible with that being done on the Perimeter Center site. 10. The funding for the first phase of the Avery Road improvements will be shared by the Perimeter Center developer, the City of Dublin and Riverside Hospital. 11. Concurrent with the first phase of the AVery Road widening, the City also will be improving sections of Avery Road north from Post Road to the existing boulevard on Muirfield Drive where Indian Run Meadows and Muirfield Drive begin. 12. There are several items on the composite plan that have not been put on the application that will have to be dealth with specifically at the time of the Final Development Plan; items such as deed restrictions, some engineering and bike paths. 13. Much of the discussion regarding the application centered on potential traffic impacts to the Avery Road interchange. The plan has substantiall changed and been modified to address concerns, primarily the 8.6 acres being set aside and dedicated toward the completion of a westbound ramp and the possible addition of another ramp. 14. The City will be working with Riverside Hospital as well as the State of Ohio to provide for direct actress across that land into the Riverside Hospital site. 15. Staff feels strongly that direct access off the ramp will be best for Dublin's local traffic concerns, attempting to avoid as many left turns into the Riverside site off of Avery Road as possible. 16. The concerns of the Planning Commission such as architecture, parking, interior roadway connections, etc. are well. articulated in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting. 17. The developer /applicants will work with staff to provide better access to the Mast property to the north. Mr. Mast owns 14 acres yet to be incorporated with roadways, curb cuts, etc. 18. The Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the application with the following conditions: 10 -001 Z/F DP/FDP /CU liczoning /Pi chininary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS l of lin City Council M eeting ll Nauon:d craphtcs Corp.. cols.. e. Form No. 109 11eld February 21, 1989 ly The regula y scheduled Led meeting of e Dublin City Council w called to order by ayor Jan Rozanski at 7: P.M. on Tuesday, Fe bru y 21, 1989. Mr. ankowski led Che Yled ge AL leg Eanc e. embers of Council prose were: Mr. Amore se, Mr. ankowski, Mrs. King, Ms. Maurer, Mayor Roza i, Mr. Strip and Mr. S phen. Mr. Hansley, City nager, and Mr. Banchefs , ph Law Direct , were also presen as were the following bets of City Staff: V . Andres, Mr. Bo an, Ms. Clarke, Chief F troll, Lt. Geis, Mr. Ha ding, Mr. Jones, F Leitzel, Mr. McDaniel s. Newcomb, Ms. Prush" g, and Mr. Willi Mr. A rase moved to approve e minutes /theFebrua b, 1989 meeting of blfn CLCy C ouncil. Stphen seconded the CEon. vote on approval of the inures was 7 -0. Presentation of Aw s and Commendations the Dublin P is Division by Mayor ozanski, with assistan errell and r. Sutphen. Mayor Rozan i expressed the appr the citiz s of Dublin to the off for a . well done. The allowing awards were pr rented to those in often ante at the meeting Sgt. Ray Scharf Firs tar - Safe Driving Sgt. Greg Potts Fi t Scar - Safe Driving Those rec/ but not pre/ere: Sgt. Second Star - rvice Eion and thanks of Councln as well a ' s of the Dublin Divis n of Police Sgt. P/1- Keck Ptl. Moody Sgt. Hung let PC 1. Pridham Pt 1. Re PV. S. Davis S First Star - afving First Scar Service First - Safe Driving First r - Service ir Scar - Safe Driving S e Driving Award er[if ica ce of Merit 24 Months Sa Ee Driving Service Award Cert iEica[e of Mer' 24 Months Safe iv ing Service Award Ce rti fit ace f Merit 24 MonChS afe Driving Service Award Correspondence There was no object' n [o the transfer of a quor permit, dba StouEf ': Dublin Hotel from he $cou£Eer lie [el Compa Co S[ouf for Hotel Mat Co rpo ra [ion. Ordinance No. 26 -88 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on 120.533 Acres Located on Che Southwest Corner of Post Road and Avery Road. Pub Lic Hearing. 1'ropo nenCS registering were: Robert Schot[e nstein, Jim Houk, Frank Swineha rt, Frank E1me r, Mark MagaloCCi, Chris C1 There ere. no registering opponents. 10- 0017 /1'DI' /P'DP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Dcvclopmcnt Plan/ Final Development Plan /conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive LSC $ $Car — $ $eTV1c L' r rst $ $tar - S Safe Drivi r rst S Scar - S Service Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD Of PROCEEDINGS Minutes o) Dublin City Council Meeting _ M(rulm" — ra,_�I rvazio„a� crannies corv., cogs., o. roan xo. :asv . -t Flc/d February 21, 1989 19 Page Three A. Finalization of roadway improvement agreement. B. Text corrections for clarity and consistency. (Ms. Clarke reports that has been done.) C. Dedication of necessary right -of -way and utility easements, including a 20 foot wide easement located adjacent to the proposed right -of -way of Avery Road and additional dedication of right -of -way along Post Road. D. Paragraph 3 of the proposed agreement regarding the reservation of the interchange subarea be amended to read, January 1, 1997. The above item dealt with the purchase terms for the 8.6 acres set aside for the proposed ramp. Staff, following discussions with the applicant, is recommendin; that the set aside be reserved for five years at which time Dublin may purchase the site at Riverside Hospital's cost. That would be strictly cost to purchase the property as well as a low interest rate that they would pay over that five years. After five years Dublin then would, if still desiring the property, purchase the property, that 8.6 acre set aside, and would then renegotiate the terms. 19. In addition to the zoning recommendation the Planning Commission moved to send a resolution to City Council staring, in a most firm way, that the rezoning was passed by the Planning Commission with the expectation that Council will put the roadway improvements as a highest priority on the Capital Improvements list. 20. As part of the traffic study that was done as part of the applicatio identified were approximately 10 million dollars of improvements. Short term - improvements to Avery Road; improvements to the west- bound ramp which in the initial phase will be widened two full lanes but in the future three additional lanes will be required; need to construct another four Lane bridge over U.S. 33 at Avery Road, more thank likely using the right -of -way of Old Avery Road. Long term improvements - a loop ramp carrying southbound Avery Road traffic to eastbound; perhaps the widening of U.S. 33 /S.R. 161, a th lane in that direction from the Avery Road interchange to 1 -270. The first proponent speaking was Mr. Robert Schottenstein, representing the applicant, U.S. Health Care, a subsidiary of Riverside Hospital. Mr. Schottenstein had the following introductory remarks: 1. This is to be a rezoning of three tracts - the Wirchanski tract (113 acres), the Cape Cod Inn tract (24 to 3 acres), and another 4 acre tract previously owned by Solomon. 2. Request to rezone entire tract to Planned Commerce District. 3. Riverside Hospital has been looking at the Dublin area for over 10 years. 4. Since the early 1960s Riverside Hospital has been the hospital of choice for Dublin residents. 5. The hospital feels that there is a need in Dublin for more immediate and more available health care. 6. The present hospital campus on Rt. 315 is about 40 to 45 acres. 7. It was necessary to purchase the Larger tract,and as a result the applicant sought to develop meaningfuL and appropriate land uses for the remaining acreage. Mr. Houk of Bohm -NBBJ discussed the proposed land uses. 1. The development will have mixed uses - the lower 45 acres will be developed in medically related uses; the center portion will be ringed in between roadways similar to the Perimeter Center site with about 25 acres of retail with a few acre^ ^- ^- - ^ ^• ^' ^a parcels; as as well as an office development. 10- 001'L /PDP /f DP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan / final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Pnel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS l fiuurc.Y of Dublin City C oun c il Meet ;)fern iti;; nab" National G'aPluCS Corp.. Colz.. O. Porn No. m9111• February 21, 1989 f<) Page Four 2. Access to the location, according to plan, will be from two full service intersections that will allow for a continual straight -in from the ramp, relieving movements that would further compound those already on Avery Road. 3. Are working with O.D.O.T. (Ohio Department of Transportation). 4. Intensive standards have been adopted regarding controlled frontage on AVery Road - strict architectural standards; uses along Avery Road fronting internally; controlled Low signage along Avery Road; sloped roofs; one story buildings. 5. Establishment along Avery Road of a major entry into the northwest portion of Dublin. 6. A landscape plan for the buffer on Post Road. 7. Architectural standards for the retail and office have been written to match Perimeter Center. Mr. Frank Swinehart, Senior Vice - President for U.S. Health Care, the parent company, discussed the medically related uses that are planned. lie noted that in the first phase would be medical /office space to provide family practice care as well as certain subspecialties as well as an urgent care center and some diagnostic services (x -ray, laboratory, e.g.).j The second phase will expand the medical office space as well as add' out patient services. The third phase will be a full 100 bed in patient facility. He noted that each phase would be in a time frame of approxi- mately five years. Mr. Schottenstein said that with regard to the traffic issue chat he had the following comments: 1. Riverside Hospital, the Perimeter Center developer and the City of Dublin have agreed to a partnership that calls for each party to pay for one third of the phase one improvement costs on Avery Road. 2. Regarding the interchange are of approximately M acres that has been set aside, or reserved, for future ramp completion. He said than the applicant will continue to work with O.D.O.T. and assist Dublin in bringing that about. 3. Wilbur Smith Associates of Pittsburgh, an independent consultant, was hired by Riverside Hospital to analyze the interchanges, etc, and they have determined that there wilt be acceptable service levels) for the area through 1999. Mr. Schottenstein said that the office intensity has been reduced by more i than 157, further enhancing the traffic situation. With regard to utilities, Mr. Schottenstein said chat Riverside Hospital has employed the firm of EMH &T to properly assist in providing for all j utilities, including drainage. He said that there will be no problem in provding easements, casements which Mr. Bowman mentioned in his opening remarks. Mr. Schottenstein noted that the qualitative standards relative to land- scaping, buffering, hedges, roofs, and outparcels as welt as the architectural standards will match those of Perimeter Center. He also noted that the deed restrictions will be made a part of the second stage of the zoning process. Mr. Schottenstein reported that they have met with various surrounding civic associations as well as with the Dublin Chamber of Commerce and chat all have been very supportive of the proposal. Mr. Frank Elmer was present, representing Mr. Lowell Mast's interests, the owner of the property zoned office to the north of Post Road, west of Avery Road. 10- 001! /PD1 /CU Rezoning /preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development plan /Conditional Use I<ro Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS .1 1iuules of Dublin Ci Council .11vct ' n�0'�1 Narionm era nnics Corn -. cols.. U. corm so. lost u }�; llcld February 21, 1989 N Page Five Mr. Elmer noted that planning activity for the area has started and that there were some concerns - the alignment of Perimeter Center Drive, the proposed handling of Post Road. He noted that moving the connection i of Post Road and Perimeter Center Drive to the east of constructing a new small street from the new road north from Perimeter Drive to Mr. Mast's propery would greatly facilitate traffic flow on their site. lie also commented that it had been mentioned that the engineering for the Muirfield Boulevard extension is now in process and that the 14 acre tract owned by the Masts will lose a significant portion of its frontage along Avery Road because of the curvature preferred by the engineer designing Muirfield Boulevard, and that access to this property will be reduced to right turn only. Mr. Elmer also mentioned that the buffering suggested by the applicant on Post Road proposes to further reduce visibility to the Mast site. He did say that they had been assured of cooperation by City staff with regard to their concerns. Mr. Chris Cline, speaking on behalf of the Post Road Homeowners Association and the Indian Run Meadows Residents Association said that both groups,, generally support the application and appreciated the cooperation of the developers with the residents in presenting their plan to them and allowing the residents to ask questions and express their concerns. Mr. Cline noted that they felt that the land uses were appropriate. lie said that although they considered the traffic issues to be settled in the immediate area that they felt that there are going to be traffic needs that need to be addressed by the City, specifically the expansion of the interchange and that the southwest corner with the loop for South Avery to eastbound U.S. 33 is probably the most crucial traffic aspect that Dublin will face in the coming years. He noted that they felt that it would be a prudent approach from a municipal standpoint to deter- mine what land will be needed for the ramps and acquire said land. Mrs. King expressed her concern regarding traffic, and said that she would be more comfortable if there were an engineering drawing of the revisions to the cloverleaf and if the City were further in the process of getting O.D.O.T. approval. Mayor Rozanski said that he had discussed the situation with O.D.O.T. and that they will not even consider a ramp or cloverleaf until there is a sufficient amount of traffic to justify one; that you have to have a bottleneck before you can find a solution. With regard to a breakdown of cost of the 10 million dollars of improve- ments, Mr. Bowman said that the bridge itself will probably cost about 2'S million dollars, possibly 3 million dollars; the ramp will be the most expensive with a high acquisition cost, business relocation as well as construction; that it would depend upon how well the office market continues and that if there would be clean industrial uses the traffic probably would be less; the addition on U.S. 33 will cost 2 to 3 million dollars. Mr. Bowman said that the total package of 10 million dollars could be spread out - the improvements, the loop ramp, the additional lanes on U.S. 33 - that the minimum would probably be within a 10 year time frame. Mr. Sutphen commented chat he wanted to remind everyone that the south sic of U.S. N3 will need to be addressed as well. I Responding to a question from Mr. Strip, Mr. Schottenstein said that U.S. Health Care is a non - profit corporation affiliated with Riverside Hospital of the Ohio Western Council of the Methodist Church, and that as such are exempt from real estate taxes. It was also noted that the remainder of the uses — rho tiro would nor be. exempt from real estate taxes. 10-00 1 Z /PD P /FDP /CU I , Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional 1Jsc Kroger Fuel Station 71001iospiml Drive RECORD Of PROCEEDINGS l finites o/ Dubli City Council Meeting 1 fm 9 t°^ _ nauonm crane:cs Corp. tai:.. o, room x=. ms>w; 11"(d February 21, 1989 19 Page Six Mayor Rozanski asked if there were any plans for the present Cape Cod structures. Mr. Schottenstein said that as soon as development begins that the structures would probably be razed. Mr. Sutphen suggested that it would present an ideal place to practice fire fighting. There will be a third reading of the Ordinance on March 6, 1989. Ordinance No 112 -88 - Ordinance Provi d' g for a Change of Zoning on 14.814 Ac s located on Za of Martin Road, West of wmill j Road. blic Rearing. Mr. eno Darns registeret. ere were no registered Mr. B owman had the falls egarding the pplication: 1. The subject sit is 14.82 acres located on e south side of the proposed Stan idge Lane and north of M in Road, approximately 1100 Eeet st of Sawmill Road. 2. The Conc t Plan for this deve Lopm [ was approved by the Pie ing - and Z ing Commission on Novembe 10, 1988 and Council appr ad the oncept Plan on November 1 1988. 3. previous application had en filed but was subseque ly withdrawn y the applicant over a at ago. 4 This plan represents a assembly of 8 lots curre y owned by 5 property owners. j 5. The northern half f the land is currently z ad R -4; the southern half is zoned j 6. The applican is requesting approval of he revised PreliX i De velopme Plan, rezoning [he grope y to a Planned Unit ment de gnation for 165 units, 13 ,000 square foot recirter as w as condominium offices Calling 40,250 square fe 7. Th plan eliminates any acces onto Martin Road; all ve "cular access Ill be from StoneRidge La 8. The retirement building 11 be two and three star' s high due to i the slope of the prop ty. 9. Matching materials, he same features, the sa architecture will be repeated as p of the offices. 10. The retirement enter will contain a has' living unit of 550 square i feet, Large ommon areas, along with 6 to 65 care units. 11. Parking w' 1 be 90 spaces. 12. The oEf'ces will be fronting Ston idge Lane. 13. The ilding /land ratio for th offices will be 8400 aqua feet w 'ch is less than the avera 10,000 square foot offic structure. 14. tiff recommends approval. l 15. The Planning Commission Ise unanimously recommend approval with the following conditi s: A. Complete fin roadway of Stoneridge La e as part of the first phase. B. Consoli to the curb cuts along St eRidge Lane to promote traf 'c safety. C. Pr ide adequate parking for as and appropriate buffer'ng ong all residential neig ors. D. Incorporate and /or reloc e existing mature trees d land- scaping, and provide reening at the base of th electrical tower. r. Darns commenced that had agreed to the above onditions. He also noted chat SToneridge L e is very important to t ,orr and said that the JALL "people" ar moving ahead with their rt lie also commented at Theis Investment Prop tie„ l0_00JZ /PU11/FDP /CU ridge Medical C ter has already dedicated 'he ri( Rezoning /PI'el intinal'y Development Pl an /Final balance of ch roadway to be put in. Development Plan /Conditional USe Kroger FUCI Slation 7100 1- 1ospital Drive C I T Y 0 F D U B L I N Department of Planning & Development MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JANUARY 19, 1989 1. 5Re zo g Application - ZS 004 - Riverside Med' al Mall 2. ning Application - 8 -015 - Woodin Tra 1r. Grace, the chai an, called the meet' g to order at 7;40 m. Commission member :in attendance were Amorose, Mr. Ber n, Mr. Campbell, Mr. fler, and Ms. Raus Mr. Geese was ab nt. Staff members in a endance were Ms. C1 ke, Ms. Leitzell, Bowman, Mr. Willis, Mr Banchefsky, and tor. ones. Mr. G ce informed everyo in attendance of t meeting procedure s fo ows: presentation staff report, pre! tation by applican , mments from the co nity, questions fr Commission to appl'cant and /or staff, fol1 ed by an appropriat vote. Mr. Robert Me r, of behalf of Wil x Road Associates, equested the tabling of e application Z88- - WDODIN TRACT un 1 a later date to permit wo ing with the staff , several items. 1. Rezoning Application - Z88 -004 - Riverside Medical Mall Ms. Clarke presented slides of the site and surrounding area and informed the Commission of the applicant's proposal as outlined in the Staff Report of January 19, 1989. -The site is over 120 acres, and almost all of it (except a few Community Commercial acres - -Cape Cod Inn and former hotel site -- abutting the freeway) is classified in the R, Rural District, and is still being cultivated. To the west is additional agriculturally zoned and used land; to the north across Post Road is property zoned PUD for a nursing home (recently completed), one single - family house zoned R -1 and the Mast residence which is also zoned PUD for offices. To the east across Avery Road is the Perimeter Center PCD with a 3 -acre out parcel at the Post /Avery intersection that is still zoned in the LI, Limited Industrial District. Along the southern boundary of the site is U.S. 33 /St. Rt. 161 which is built as a limited access freeway along this stretch. The parcel is rectangular in shape and has about 2,800 feet of frontage on Avery Road and 2,000 feet along U.S. 33 /St. Rt. 161. 10- 001Z /1 /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan) Final Development Plan /Conditional Use 5131 Post Rd. Suite #105 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 -The applicant is requesting a rezoning to the PCD, Planned Commerce District, for a mixed use development including office and institutional (27t acres); retail (27± acres); hospital, medical office and hotel (46'_ acres). This is to be a phased complex, and while Riverside Hospital plans to retain architectural control over the entire site, several areas will be sold for development by others. The applicant's text and plan repeat the landscape buffer along Post Road and Avery Road which is to be employed to the east of Avery Road as part of the Perimeter Center. -A traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated December, 1988, had been distributed to the Commission members along with the Staff Report. The proposed road network for Riverside /Dublin mirrors that being done to the east of Avery Road under the Perimeter Center Plan. -The first phase of the Avery Road improvements, not requiring an additional bridge over U.S. 33 /St. Rt. 161, is currently being engineered. The funding for this first phase will be equally shared by the City of Dublin, the Perimeter Center developer, and Riverside Hospital. Concurrent with the first phase of the Avery Road widening, the City will also be improving the section of Avery Road between Post Road and Indian Run Meadow where Muirfield Drive starts. -Staff recommends approval of the rezoning subject to: 1. Finalization of roadway improvement agreement, 2. Text corrections for clarity and consistency, and 3. Dedication of necessary right -of -way and utility easements. -Ms. Clarke pointed out that under the PCD, this is the Composite Plan. There are several elements of the Composite Plan which are missing, from this application and will have to be dealt with at the time of the Development Plan. For instance, deed restrictions, engineering issues, and bikepath plan are missing components of the Composite Plan. Mr. Willis informed the Commission of the following: -He stated that the Avery Road improvement plan is complete enough to give the developer a description of the right -of -way dedication needed for that road improvement. Additionally, the City is requesting the dedication of right -of -way along Post Road (30 feet from centerline). -The City of Dublin is designing and will be constructing a waterline along the west side of Avery Road adjacent to the proposed right -of -way. Mr. Willis stated that he has a description of the waterline easement to be given to the developer requesting that the easement be granted as part of the rezoning. -Mr. Willis stated that sewer service for this site is available along the South Fork of Indian Run on the north side of Post Road or from Avery Road for the eastern portion of the site. -At time of Development Plan, the developer needs to provide on -site storm water detention. -In reference to the Post Road cul -de -sac shown on the plans, Mr. Willis stated that the developer only owns land to the center line of Post Road. In order to include this proposed cul -de -sac work, it will be necessary to include or at least obtain the permission of the property owner to the north of Post Road. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 Mr. Bob Schottenstein, attorney representing OGC Development Company, a non - profit subsidiary of Riverside Hospital, stated that for presentation purposes, the developer would be referred to as Riverside. Mr. Schottenstein stated that this application involves the rezoning of three tracts: the Wirchanski property, 112 acres; the former Cape Cod Inn (2.5 ac.), which is about to be owned by Riverside; and the former Solomon piece (4 ac.) which is now owned by Riverside. He stated that the presentation would consist of three parts: he will present a brief statement providing some background and later a summary; Mr. Jim Houk, a landscape architect with Bohm NBBJ will present the land use plan; and Mr. Frank Swinehart, a representative from Riverside Hospital, will present Riverside's intention for the property. Mr. Schottenstein stated that Riverside Hospital has been looking at the Dublin area for more than 10 years because for more than 20 years, Riverside has been the hospital of choice for most of Dublin. This is an ideal piece with highway frontage, but it is more than Riverside needs. It is Riverside's goal is to make this property the focal point for health care in the northwest part of Columbus. Mr. Houk presented several drawings representing the land use plan: - Regional Analysis Plan: new roadway from Coffman through Perimeter Center site, through Riverside site, and eventually tying back into the interchange at Post .Road /St. Rt. 161 /U.S. 33. - Preliminary Plan: old plan - previous response from Commission dealt with concern about the interchange ramp extending directly into the site and that it may eliminate the ability to complete the possible interchange, contingent upon approvals from ODOT. Likewise, ODOT's concern was similar to that of the Planning Commission on how that interchange could eventually get completed if needed and its effect on the state - controlled highway system. - Preliminary Land Use Plan: includes modification of 8.6 acres set aside for completion of an interchange westbound ramp and the possible addition of a split ramp which feeds off the existing ramp directly into the site. Both Avery Road intersections are made into full- service intersections allowing movement back out of the site and providing a system that works which is not dependent on the interchange ramp ever being constructed. To accommodate these revisions, the office acreage has been reduced from 32 acres to 27 acres. - Buffer Plan: the buffer treatment along Post and Avery Roads will match the landscape treatment along the Perimeter development. - Architectural Materials: the same materials are specified in the Riverside standards for retail usage as were in the Perimeter standards -- -low development along Avery Road, sloped roofs. Architecture will reflect a unified development with architectural review by the Planning Commission. Plan includes 50 -foot setback along Avery Road, 100 -foot setback along Post Road. Mr. Swinehart, Sr. Vice- President of Corporate Development for U.S. Health and Riverside, stated that the health care industry is directing its method of delivery from in- patient to out - patient services. He outlined Riverside's expectations for development of the medical uses on the site: 10 -001 Z /PUP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pimd Development Plan /Conditional Use Krogcr Puel Station 7100 1lospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning, and Zoning Commission Page 4 Phase 1: Medical office buildings, urgent care center, and some ambulatory care /diagnostic services. Phase 2: An expansion of the medical office buildings, addition of more sub - specialists in those medical office buildings as the population grows, increased ambulatory care /diagnostic services, and probably out - patient surgery. Phase 3: The possibility of a 100 -bed hospital. Mr. Schottenstein summarized a few points regarding the proposal: Traffic: -Avery Road Improvement - willing to commit to one -third of Phase I improvement costs. - Interchange - 81 acres have been reserved to allow for the possible completion of the westbound ramp. - Traffic Plan - basically mirrors Perimeter roadway network; the access has been improved, and traffic consultants have indicated it works at acceptable service levels with or without the interchange ramp. Utilities: - E.M.H. &T., the consulting engineers, has assisted Riverside in regard to utilities and is present at the meeting to answer any questions. Land Use: -About 45 to 50% of the useable property is being devoted to health care. Other land uses match Perimeter standards. Potential tax revenues for the community. Quality: - High - quality design standards, deed restrictions, architectural review, and landscaping have been matched with the Perimeter development. Commitment to quality. Community: -Have met with area homeowners' associations and the Chamber of Commerce. All are very supportive of this project. Mr. Schottenstein stated that the conditions outlined by staff in the Staff Report of January 19, 1989, are acceptable to Riverside. Mr. Chris Cline, representing the Post Road Residents' Association, stated that Riverside met with the Post Road, Indian Run, and Hemmingway Residents' Associations prior to filing its rezoning application. Riverside did a presentation and asked for resident input. Mr. Cline stated that his summary of the response was supportive. He added that most of the issues the residents considered to be major have been resolved. Mr. Bill Fearon, the owner of a manufacturing company off Avery Road south of St. Rt. 161, welcomed the proposed development but expressed concern about the capacity of the Avery Road /St. Rt.161 /U.S. 33 interchange- to carry the traffic load. He stated that the cloverleaf interchange needs to be addressed. Mr. Lowell Mast, the owner of the 14 acre tract north of this site on Post Road, expressed concern about this plan not addressing the PUD zoning for SO, Suburban Office and Institutional uses which already exists on the north side of Post Road. The present proposal limits the traffic patterns that are available for development on his 14 acres. He stated that he has not had any discussion with Riverside. Mr. Mast asked about the restrictions on the office area within this development. Mr. Amorose stated that the Commission will go into detail on the permitted uses in Sub -area A (offices). 10- 001L/PDP /RDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Deg dopment Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 7 100 I- lospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 Ms. Marybeth Spittle, from the Indian Run Meadow Civic Association, stated that association representatives have met with Riverside and are impressed with this project. She did express concern about the possibility of a Post Road cul -de -sac diverting traffic onto Tara Hill Drive. Ms. Spittle asked about the disposal of infectious waste from the facilities on this site. Mr. Swinehart assured her that the infectious waste would be disposed of properly. Mr. Houk stated that the proposed Post Road cul -de -sac is not a part of Riverside's proposal unless the City of Dublin requests it. It is only schematically represented on the plans because it has been discussed as a possibility by the City. Mr. Berlin addressed the following issues: -Will the hospital and medical offices be tax exempt? Mr. Frank Pandora, the general council for Riverside and the parent company, U.S. Health, stated that the hospital is tax exempt, but most of the medical office uses are not. Mr. Schottenstein added that the previously submitted forecast assumed tax exemption from a real estate tax standpoint. - Timetable on the construction of health care facilities. Mr. Swinehart stated that medical offices and urgent care will be provided during the first phase of development. The construction of the hospital will depend on community need, but it will probably be at least 10 years. -Is Riverside willing to donate the land for the interchange? Mr. Pandora stated that Riverside is willing to hold it in reserve for a period of time for the City's option to purchase it at the fair market value. -Mr. Berlin expressed concern about the traffic pattern with this development. He stated that traffic studies were done by Perimeter and Riverside and asked if a study had been done by the City. He asked if staff was willing to accept Riverside's study as being the best for Dublin. Mr. Bowman stated that in the long run, what is good for Dublin is really a matter of economics. From a cost effective standpoint and level of services proposed with this study, the staff feels that the City is getting a good deal. Mr. Grace requested that Mr. Bowman give an overview of the Avery Road improvements, the completion of the Muirfield Boulevard portion, and the possibilities he has considered for the interchange, including cost figures and timetables for these improvements. Mr. Bowman suggested that Wilbur Smith Associates first outline the traffic plan, then he would finish up with Dublin's point of view. Mr. Mark Magalotti of Wilbur Smith Associates outlined the proposed roadway improvements from the study. He stated that he has been working closely with staff reviewing these improvements, looking at alternatives from a design standpoint, including cost estimates. The improvement costs are in excess of $10 million. - Improvements to Avery Road - Improvement of Ramp A - Improvements on Avery Road extending south beyond the Riverside and Perimeter sites including a four -lane bridge crossing St. Rt. 161. - Construction of a two -lane loop ramp to carry eastbound St. Rt. 161 traffic. -Widen St. Rt. 161 to six lanes from this interchange east to the I -270 interchange. 10- OOI'L /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan / Pmal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Station 710011ospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 �w Mr. Schottenstein asked Mr. Magalotti to outline Phase I improvements. Phase I Improvements: (to begin at start of development) - Widening of Avery Road from Post Road southward with transition back to the existing Avery Road bridge over St. Rt. 161. Improvements (estimated at $1.1 to $1.2 million) will be shared in thirds by the City of Dublin, Riverside and Perimeter developers. Later Phases of Improvements: - Construction of six -lane bridge across St. Rt. 161 - Eastbound loop ramp - Improvements to St. Rt. 161 east to I -270 interchange Mr. Campbell addressed the following, issues: - Riverside's willingness to make the commitment on the water line easement. Mr. Schottenstein stated that Riverside is willing to commit to the water line easement, as well as every other condition set forth in the Staff Report. Mr. Willis noted that the water line easement is a 20 -foot strip of land immediately adjacent to the proposed right -of -way. - Location for water retention on the site. Mr. Greg Comfort, consulting engineer from E.M.H. &T., explained that he has been working with Mr. Willis on the utilities for the Perimeter site, the Avery /Muirfield Drive extension, and the Riverside site. Mr. Comfort outlined the proposed water line, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage improvements. He explained that the site has storm drainage in two directions, and retention basins (wet ponds), designed in accordance with Dublin /MORPC standards, are proposed near the Post /Avery corner of the site and the southern area of the site. - Possibility of fast -food or drive -thru operation on out parcels along Avery Road. Mr. Houk stated that any drive -thru facility will be a conditional use. - Determination on Post Road cul -de -sac. Mr. Bowman explained that the goal is to avoid as many left turns as possible onto and off of Avery Road. A determination on the construction of a cul -de -sac on Post Road will not be made until such time as Perimeter Drive is constructed through the Riverside site and other access alternatives are provided. Mr. Grace asked for clarification from Mr. Bowman on the City's commitment and a timetable on the bridge over St. Rt. 161, addition of four lanes on Avery Road south to Shier Rings Road, additional ramps on the northwest and southwest quadrants of the interchange, etc. Mr. Bowman presented an overview of the traffic issues for the area. The issue was how does the City get to the capital improvements necessary under any scenario versus those that would work given the land use proposals with Perimeter and Riverside. Given the traffic solutions proposed with these two developments, the traffic intensity and delays will be busy but acceptable. Priority on capital improvements will be directed to: - Extension of Coffman Road - -a new outlet altogether for redistribution of traffic. - A loop ramp in the southwest quadrant. a - A ramp extension over Avery Road into the Riverside site. E- O- o C Timetable: The Coffman Road extension is under preliminary design- -expec u O to have a public hearing on alternatives within next couple months. The key to these capital improvements is to make the commitment, get the i � 2 0 land under Dublin's control, apply for federal or state funding„ put on capital improvement program and build when necessary. e a` R L � E k o N c o = G O u bfiC J Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 7 Mr. Leffler asked about meetings with ODOT. Mr. Bowman stated that the City has met with ODOT, and ODOT's concern is with the state system. They would prefer that local traffic concerns be dealt with in terms of land use. ODOT is looking at the Wilbur- -Smith traffic study investigating the diamond interchange idea with a turn -off onto the Riverside site. Mr. Schottenstein stated that NOT has indicated that it will give this idea maximum consideration, but there are no guarantees. Mr. Amorose addressed the following issues: - Referenced text for Subareas A, B, and C relating to parking, garages and percentage of land area that can be covered by structures. Mr. Houk stated that parking garages are planned presently; Riverside perceives more of a campus -style development. Mr. Houk stated that he will work with the Planning staff on clarification and acceptable numbers. - Subarea B - Retail Center - Permitted Uses: - Drive -thru facility: Mr. Houk clarified that drive -thru facilities will be listed as Conditional Use. - Theaters: Mr. Houk stated that the text is referencing a "Flicker's- type" theater. - Parking: Clarification on bank drive -thru stacking requirement per Columbus Zoning Code. Ms. Clarke explained the Code standard and noted that it is the guideline which has been used for other drive. -thru uses in Dublin. - Subareas B -1 & B -2 - General: - Clarification on orientation on the face of the out parcels will be to the west, and at the corners, toward the intersecting streets. Mr. Houk explained that, as was the case with Perimeter, the commercial fronts of the centers will be facing inward rather than facing Avery Road. The buildings will have controlled roof levels - -all pitched roofs; back side of buildings will be finished materials; low, landscaped signage on the exterior - -no building signage. internal service access; providing a residential character along the Avery Road corridor. Ms. Clarke asked if a building on the corner of Perimeter Drive and Avery Road could be oriented toward the northeast. Mr. Houk replied no, it could only face an internal road. Mr. Leffler addressed the following issues: - Subarea B - Paving standards: Mr. Houk explained that there are certain paving specifications within the development. He stated that he expects the developer to meet with Mr. Willis and meet standards set by him. Mr. Willis clarified that the actual streets within the development are public streets. - Subarea C -1 - Permitted Uses: Questioned health and fitness center listed as a Permitted Use and felt it should be a Conditional Use. Mr. Swinehart explained that this use is an integral part of a health care facility and also a benefit provided to employees. - Agreement dated December 20, 1988, relating to land reserved for possible ramp in northwest quadrant: Questioned January 1, 1995, holding date. Mr. Leffler suggested date of January 1, 1995, or the opening date of the hospital, whichever is later. Mr. Schottenstein stated that staff had requested five years. He noted that the date is not tied to acquisition and /or construction, but only on a decision being made by the City to acquire the land. Mr. Pandora stated his willingness to work with the City. Mr. Schottenstein noted that the City could take the land by eminent domain. a c a� o o Uo' U %, o c o � Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 8 Mr. Amorose addressed the following issues: -When will the Cape Cod building and parking lot would be razed. Mr. Schottenstein replied that it will happen at the earliest possible date. - Suggested that the text be formatted for each subarea. Ms. Rausch addressed the following issues: - Subarea C -1 - Flat Roofs: Mr. Houk stated that preference will be for pitched roofs, but it is very difficult on some medical buildings for architectural reasons. The text could permit pitched roofs with flat roofs requiring approval by the Commission. -- Traffic issues: Expressed concern about rezoning this property without commitment from the City on roadway improvements. Mr. Bowman agreed that rezonings need to be reviewed based on the City's ability to do the capital improvements. Mr. Amorose stated that he feels Council recognizes that capital improvements are necessary in this area of the City, and this type of development does generate enough tax revenue for the City to do some improvements. Mr. Bowman noted that the Coffman Road extension was approved by Council in 1988 as part of the five -year Capital Improvement Project plan. Mr. Schottenstein noted that, according to the traffic study, the traffic patterns and service levels are acceptable with or without Coffman Road ever being extended. Mr. Magalotti stated that the (southwest quadrant) loop ramp is critically important to the Perimeter and Riverside sites. Without the construction of this loop ramp in the very near future, these sites will have problems. Mr. Grace addressed the following issues: -Does Riverside's interest in developing loop ramps equate into dollars toward construction. Mr. Schottenstein replied that he felt it was asking too much for these developers to absorb a cost which, from his perspective, was unprecedented. Mr. Grace asked Mr. Willis and Mr. Bowman if they agreed with the cost figures on Table 13 of the traffic study. Mr. Bowman agreed with the figures. Mr. Grace asked about the cost of the acreage in the proposed interchange area. Mr. Pandora stated that Riverside currently owns only the 4 -acre Solomon piece which was purchased for $350,000. Mr. Grace asked if Riverside would be willing to execute, instead of the proposed reservation for the 8.5 acres for the northwest ramp, a 10 -year option for the City to purchase the acreage at Riverside's purchase price. Mr. Grace noted that as the property develops, the fair market value of the acreage set aside for the ramp will appreciate. Mr. Pandora denied this request. He stated that the Cape Cod Inn piece is even more expensive per acre than the Solomon piece, and this purchase price will not be equal to the carry cost of the property for 10 years. Mr. Schottenstein and Mr. Magalotti stated that the construction of either loop ramp benefits the Perimeter site about 4:1 over the Riverside site. Mr. Pandora stressed the need for immediate approval due to over - extended purchase options on this acreage. Mr. Grace expressed a crucial need for the roadway improvements prior to the traffic being generated from the combined sites. He suggested that, as part of the approval, Dublin City Council commit to the construction of the ramps and the widening of the roads before the traffic is generated from these sites. Mr. Banchefsky stated that the approval cannot be contingent upon Council's approval, but a motion could be made on a recommendation to Council to implement the improvements. Mr. Bowman stated that the 8.6 acres is not large enough 2 a c 2 � O 0 o U o p " U c. 0 0 coo o N Minutes of Meeting, January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 9 for a properly designed loop ramp. Mr. Bowman stated that the ramps on the east side of the interchange are substandard, so even if the City asked for a mirror image on the west side, the State may not approve the request. - -Does the City have sufficient right -of -way on Avery Road to construct the additional bridge across St. Rt. 161 /U.S. 33. Until final engineering is done, right -of -way is flexible. Mr. Bowman stated that he foresees the new bridge being built on top of Old Avery Road. Mr. Willis added that Old Avery Road is still under public jurisdiction. -Is the City asking for State funds when it goes to ODOT for approval, and would the project be speeded up if it were not asking for State funds. Mr. Bowman stated that the City would apply for whatever it could get. The second bridge will be needed in the near future, and the chance of getting State or Federal funds in two or three years is virtually impossible. Mr. Berlin asked if Perimeter will be adding another lane or two on the entrance ramp on the northeast corner of U.S. 33 and Avery Road. Mr. Bowman stated that right -of -way will be dedicated, and the first phase with the widening of Avery Road will increase the current ramp to two full lanes. Mr. Lowell Mast stated that it was presented to the Commission that the planning for the utilities has been underway to the point that construction can be started this spring. He stated that discussion has not taken place nor have easements been granted for utilities north of Post Road. Mr. Willis stated that Riverside has not yet completed its final engineering plans; therefore, it would not have been appropriate for them to be seeking easements as yet for those utilities. Ms. Clarke outlined Subarea A (offices) as requested earlier by Mr. Mast. - Permitted Use: basically office buildings - Height: maximum height of 35 feet, no representation contained in text as to intensity (assumption is that they could not exceed 10,000 square feet per acre) Mr. Houk agreed that in Subareas A -1 and A -2, with a 100 -foot setback along Post Road, it would not be possible to exceed 10,000 to 11,000 square feet per acre. Mr. Campbell asked for further clarification on a resolution on the Post Road cul -de -sac. Mr. Bowman stated that he would prefer to have right -in /right -out turns at the Post /Avery intersection, and it would not be critical to construct a cul -de -sac if a median exists. Mr. Cline stated that if a median is constructed eliminating left turns in and out of the Mast property, a signalized intersection should be provided to access his property. Mr. Mast stated that if access is not available from both directions on Avery Road, provision should be made for a connection between his property and Loop Road. Mr. Bowman stated that the City intends to do its own traffic alignments to provide the best alternative for all land owners. Mr. Houk agreed that they would work with staff on this alignment. 10 -001 Z /PDP/RDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Rimal Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger RnCI Station 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, .January 19, 1989 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 10 Mr. Amorose moved to approve the rezoning subject to: 1. Finalization of roadway improvement agreement; 2. Text corrections for clarity and consistency, and 3. Dedication of necessary right -of -way and utility easements, including a 20 -foot wide easement located adjacent to the proposed right -of -way of Avery Road, and additional dedication of right - -of -way along Post Road. 4. Paragraph 3 of the proposed agreement regarding the reservation of the interchange subarea be amended to read January 1, 1997. Mr. Campbell seconded the motion. Mr. Schottenstein expressed Riverside's willingness to comply with these conditions. Ms. Clarke noted that there were several text changes discussed during the meeting. Mr. Amorose stated that the applicant agreed to those changes during the meeting, and Mr. Houk agreed to work with staff. The vote was as follows: Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Rausch, ves; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Berlin, no; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Grace, yes. Motion carried 5 -1. Ms. Rausch made a motion that the Commission send a resolution to City Council stating in a most firm way that this rezoning was passed by Commission with the expectation that Council will put the roadway improvements as highest priority on the Capital Improvements list. The motion was seconded, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Grace, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Motion approved 6 -0. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Tamra S. Bray, Secretary Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ... 10- 0017, /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ final Development Plan /Conditional Use Krogcr Fuel Station 7100 Iiospiwl Drivc Minutes of Meeting, October. 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 11 4. Informal Rezoning Application Z88 -004 - Riverside Medical Mall Ms. Leitzell presented slides of the area outlining the site as follows: -The overall site contains 120 acres, most of which is still classified in the R, Rural District. To the west is additional agriculturally zoned and used land; and to the north across Post Road is property zoned PUD for a nursing home (recently completed) , one single - family house zoned R -1, and the Mast property which is also zoned PUD for offices. To the east across Avery Road is the Perimeter Center PCD with a 3 -acre outparcel at the Post /Avery intersection that is still zoned in the LI, Limited Industrial District. Along the southern boundary of the site is U.S. 33 /St. Rt. 161 which is built as a limited access freeway along this stretch. -The Cape Cod Inn Restaurant which is zoned CC, Community Commercial District, was excluded from the initial application, but the applicant now controls the restaurant site in addition to the former motel site located to its rear. The subject parcel is rectangular and has about 2,800 feet of frontage on Avery Road and 2,000 feet along U.S. 33/ St. Rt. 161. Ms. Clarke presented the following details: -This application was review informally by the Commission in April of 1988. With the acquisition of the Cape Cod Inn, the site now contains over 120 acres. The PCD, Planned Commerce District, is requested for the entire site. - Generally, the applicant is requesting a medical complex on the southern 48 acres; a 27 -acre retail /commercial site; office uses are planned along the Post Road frontage; and the western portion of the site is to be used for office or institutional uses. One area on Post Road near the center of the frontage could contain retail activities. -The application includes a buffering plan for Post Road and Avery Road which would repeat the same sorts of things which were incorporated into the Perimeter Center application on the east side of Avery Road. - Riverside Hospital will not be developing the retail or non - medical office portion of this site, and it plans to sell Areas A, B, B -1, B -2 and D for development by others. The Hospital intends to retain the 48 -acre section at the southeast corner of the site for a variety of uses in the medical line (physicians' buildings, some portions of a hospital, perhaps at some time a community hospital, different types of medical clinics, and hotels). -The traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated June 6, 1988, was distributed to Commission several months ago. Ms. Clarke stated that Mark Magalotti of Wilbur Smith Associates was in attendance at the meeting to discuss any of the Commission's comments regarding both the Riverside and Perimeter sites. -The applicant has agreed to cooperate with the City and other developers in funding the ultimate expansion of Avery Road. The details for Riverside Hospital's contribution have not yet been resolved. -It is the applicant's intention to have a final determination from the City on the rezoning proposal by the end of this calendar year. 10 -001 L /PD P /FD P /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pinnl Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger Fuel Smtion 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 12 Mr. Bowman addressed a few of the Staff's specific traffic concerns as follows: -The Riverside Hospital site is somewhat different from the Perimeter Center site in that the Perimeter site was already zoned property which logically was expected to be developed. In fact, development was already in place which necessitated a traffic system network to permit the best possible development. The Riverside property is essentially in a holding state and is zoned Rural. -The land use intensity has not been determined, and Staff believes the intensity should be tied directly to the City's ability to work within the highway system in coming up with the most appropriate method to eliminate traffic on the local roads. Staff is in agreement with the traffic study performed to date, but the ability to fulfill the recommendations of the traffic study for the most part will rest with State approval. Staff is working with the applicant in effecting the approval and would like to tie the approval to the development of the site. Mr. Reiner asked if the study included the development of a loop to the clover leaf at the Avery Rd. /I -270 interchange on this applicant's property. Mr. Bowman stated that a clover leaf without access to it, as has been demonstrated in the study, will not sufficiently handle Dublin's local traffic. If we were to go to a complete limited - access type interchange, given the spacing of signals on Avery Road, Staff believes that the intensity of the development would have to be greatly reduced with perhaps one access point in and out of the site. Staff is working toward a traffic solution that works for the City and the developer by increasing the revenue from the property, allowing the area to develop sufficiently enough so that the City can justify the revenues to actually implement the improvements on the state highway. Staff would like to see the improvement but would like to first prove that it works. Mr. Bowman stated that the applicant has met with City Staff to discuss private /public participation in the ultimate improvement of Avery Road. Based on their set policies, Riverside Hospital is reluctant to expand its view to aid in a local situation. In a recent meeting with Riverside representatives, they were in agreement to look at some of these considerations. Mr. Jezerinac pointed out that improvement to an interchange is considered by ODOT and put on a five -year, long -range plan. Mr. Bowman stated that the actually funding and development in this case would be a local municipal concern as well as a private concern. A package to make it work is yet to be determined. Staff is in agreement with Commission that this rezoning should be based upon the implementation of the recommendations that have been made as part of the traffic study. Mr. Bob Schottenstein, representative for the applicant, stated that the goal of Riverside Hospital is to make this site the focal point for health care in the northwest portion of the City. It is Riverside's intent to only develop the southern 50± acres, and to sell -off the remaining acreage for development by others. Meetings continue to take place with developers, but no commitments have been made at this time. 3 0- 003Z /PDP /CDP /CIU Rezoning /Preliminary Development plan! final Development Plan /Conditional tise Kroger fuel station 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 13 Mr. Frank Swinehart, a representative from Riverside Hospital, outlined more specific plans for the development of the lower 50 acres based on demographic growth studies of the community. The proposed plan is to implement the development in three phases. The first phase (1990) will provide for physician offices and ambulatory care services. The second phase (to be added four to five years later) would be an expansion of the existing services along with some out - patient surgery services. The third phase would then be for a 100 -bed hospital for in- patient care services. Mr. Schottenstein addressed a question from the April Commission meeting regarding the economic impact of the proposed development (the entire site). Copies were distributed to the Commission members. There have been some slight changes to the concept plan since the last meeting, and Mr. Jim Houk of Bohm NBBJ was present to outline the sub -areas as detailed in the text. Mr. Houk stated that based on all the traffic studies of the area, the access elements have changed therefore adjusting some of the sub - areas. There are three access points to this site. The first intersection would be a straight access in from the freeway interchange through to the Riverside piece. The secondary entry would be a full- service intersection for Perimeter Mall and a right -in /right -out only element for this site. The third interchange to the north would be the continuation of Perimeter Drive which would tie into Post Road. Generally, the same land uses have just been adjusted to conform with the new road configuration. Efforts have been made to use a list of materials for this proposal which are consistent with Perimeter Mall, and it was also noted that the materials will be brought back to the Commission for approval. Mr. Houk presented a rendering of the Buffer Plan for Avery Road and stated that the landscape materials and hedge treatment are identical for both sides of Avery Road, as well as the same signage setbacks and standards to integrate them with the landscaping. The Buffer Plan along Post Road utilizes the same materials and style of treatment which was used for Perimeter Center. Mr. Reiner asked how this new Avery Road treatment will interface with Muirfield Boulevard. Mr. Houk stated that it is his understanding that the proposal on the table is for the developers and the City to jointly finish the boulevard north to the Post Road intersection, and at the same time, for the City to finish Avery Road from that point to the connection with existing Muirfield Boulevard. Mr. Bowman stated that there could be one or two bridges over Indian Run, but the intent is to extend the median as far south on Avery Road as possible. Mr. Reiner stated that if Muirfield Boulevard is to be extended with only a slight curve, the road will probably cut through the northeast corner of this parcel. Mr. Houk stated that they would be willing to dedicate the needed right -of -way for Avery Road widening and alignment. Mr. Jezerinac stated that he is not in agreement with much of the text and made several suggestions. -sub -area A: change day care from permitted use to Conditional Use. - Setbacks along Post Road and Avery Road should be switched around. i� a 2� o V - a Q 9 U o W E a ro c — N C 0 2L S � O V t110 COY i� Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 14 - Sub -area B: Retail: drive -in facilities should be restricted in number and listed as Conditional Use. - Sub -area C -1: Delete hotels /motels as permitted uses. (Mr. Houk stated that the hotel /motels, drive -thru pharmacies, & restaurants should have been deleted from the text). - Greater setbacks along St. Rt. 161 in keeping with established green -belt effect. - Sub -area C -2: Questioned whether the fire department can handle 65 -foot maximum building height. (Ms. Clarke stated that Metro Center has 90 -foot buildings). He also questioned the two -story minimum height building requirements. (Mr. Houk stated that in discussions with Staff, the desire was not to look down on structures at rooftop units from the freeway). - Sub -area D: In disagreement with restaurants usage. -In general, there is too much going on - -too much intensity. Mr. Jezerinac expressed concern about the parcels being sold off and the developers' interpretations of the zoning and planning issues as well as the architecture. -Mr. Reiner suggested creating a boulevard on the road bisecting the site through the southern entrance drive. -Mr. Reiner expressed concern about the vague description of materials (warm tone brick) in the text, and he noted the strong need for this entire development to have unified architectural features and materials, as well as consistent landscaping, with the Perimeter plan. -Mr. Reiner also agreed that several issues from tree caliper to land uses need to be reviewed more thoroughly. Mr. Schottenstein asked if the comments on hotel /motel uses were directed toward Sub -area C -1, and not C -2. He expressed the necessity of hotel /motel uses near medical facilities and stated that they are critical in Sub -area C -2. Mr. Swinehart explained that the trend in medical treatment is for out - patient services, and Riverside Hospital prefers a facility which they have some control over. Mr. Jezerinac suggested that the hotel /motel uses be moved to Sub -area D. Mr. Mark Magalotti with Wilbur Smith Associates presented a brief summary of the traffic study which was performed for the site. This study looked at the existing traffic in the area, along with the additional traffic which would be generated from the developments on both sides of Avery Road, to determine an access plan to serve both sites at acceptable service levels. The study area included all the intersections along Avery Road including the Post /Avery intersection; the two existing ramp terminals from Avery Road to St. Rt. 161; the intersection of Coffman and Post Roads; the interchange at I -270 and St. Rt. 161; and the Avery Road interchange and ramp system at St. Rt. 161. Mr. Magalotti stated that based on the study, the existing ramp terminals appeared to operate at an unacceptable level, and signals may currently be warranted at those two intersections. Mr. Reiner asked if the Muirfield Drive extension was assumed in the traffic study. Mr. Magalotti stated that this was taken into account, as well as some of the projections of traffic on Muirfield Drive that were part of the Master Plan and regional traffic projections for the area. The year 1998 was selected as the design year for future traffic projections. a c v F o � � o V °- - o Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and zoning Commission Page 15 Mr. Magalotti stated that based on the latest proposal as far as square footages and types of development, the Riverside site will generate approximately 19,000 vehicles a day, with 1,000 entering in the morning peak hour and 1,000 exiting in the evening peak hour. The Perimeter Mall site will generate approximately 42,000 vehicles a day, with 3,900 entering in the morning peak hour and 4,300 exiting in the evening peak hour. Then the approach distribution was studied. On the two major approach routes to this site, approximately 35 percent will approach northbound on I -270, 20 percent southbound on 1 -270, 3 percent eastbound on St. Rt. 161, 5 percent westbound on St. Rt. 161, 15 percent on Frantz Road, 2 percent south on Muirfield Drive, and 15 percent north on Avery Road. Another analysis was done of the traffic percentages for the two sites together which showed that 50 to 55 percent of the traffic accessing the Riverside and Perimeter sites would come westbound on St. Rt. 161 and exit on the existing ramp to Avery Road. The traffic was also studied with and without the Coffman Road extension which could become a very important component and could carry up to 35 percent of the traffic for these two sites. The residential traffic was also a concern on Avery Road between the two developments. Mr. Reiner asked for further clarification on how the local traffic (especially the traffic moving south on Muirfield Drive) was taken into consideration. Mr. Magalotti stated that the number of through lanes have been designed to accommodate the south movement toward the interchange. The access plan for the Riverside site shows about 60 percent left -turn movement into the site in the morning. The same problem happens in the p.m. hours for the Perimeter site. There will be two signalized access points into Perimeter and three access points to Riverside. To accommodate the heavy movement in the evening peak hour heading eastbound on St. Rt. 161, two alternate ramp systems were proposed. One was the construction of a missing loop ramp in the southwest quadrant; the second alternative would be to widen the existing ramp to a two -lane on ramp and the construction of a two -lane left turn from that point onto the existing ramp going eastbound. Mr. Magalotti informed the Commission their latest proposal to ODOT, which includes dedicating right -of -way necessary to complete the interchange in the northwest quadrant, is being reviewed at this time. Mr. Jezerinac asked who would pay for the ramp in the southwest quadrant. Mr. Schottenstein replied that the developer would not be participating in the cost. Mr. Schottenstein added that the developer has indicated that: 1) it will participate in the widening of Avery Road, including the extra lane from St. Rt. 161, 2) dedicate right -of -way, 3) and put in many of the internal roads within the site. Mr. Berlin stated that it was his understanding that the developer would do the Avery Road improvements from Post Road up to Muirfield Drive. Mr. Schottenstein said that his understanding was that the developer was to share in the cost of the improvements only between Post Road and St. Rt. 161. Ms. Clarke stated that when this case was heard by the Commission previously, the City was working on a private /public partnership, but the details had not been decided. Since that time, the deal was worked out for the City of Dublin to pay one -third of the improvement costs for Avery Road from St. Rt. 161 to Post Road. Included in the contract is the Post Road to Muirfield Drive connection to be done to be done privately and paid for entirely by the City. a G u o o a � c E a m q O V 011 J O V U O ^J Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 16 Mr. Reiner expressed further concern about the inadequacy of the proposed ramp system. Mr. Magalotti stated that the improvements are needed, and they are working toward a master plan on how this interchange could be upgraded to accommodate both sites so that whatever right -of -way is necessary can be reserved at this time. This is a long -range improvement and does not need to be in place at the time development begins.. Mr. Reiner did not agree and stated that the system may be under - designed for the amount of future traffic he anticipates. Mr. Grace stated that it was his understanding that the Avery Road improvements were to be done on a 50 -50 basis between the two developers on either side of Avery Road. Mr. Jezerinac added that it was his understanding that Riverside Hospital wanted this site to work in the best way possible and would do whatever ramp improvements were necessary. He did not feel that widening roads and adding several traffic lights were the solution to what is probably the major access point into Dublin. Mr. Amorose felt that the interchange was very awkward and designed to service only the hospital and not the community. Considering the growth possibilities for the area, the Commission members were in agreement that the proposed interchange was an inadequate solution for a very complex problem. Mr. Schottenstein expressed his confidence in the consultants' studies and his disagreement with the Commission that the developer needs to do more. He stated that the Riverside developer is prepared to pay its fair share for the Avery Road improvements between St. Rt. 161 and Post Road. Mr. Bowman pointed out that the issue is who is going to pay for the interchange. He stated that: 1) it could be negotiated through rezoning; or, 2) Council could appropriate the funds for the City to buy the interchange and make the improvements when necessary, if the Municipality has the money to do so. In return, the Riverside development could be scaled down with possibly only one signalized location on Avery Road. Mr. Geese stated that a newspaper article and the Perimeter Text showed the Avery Road improvements as a one -third cost share deal amongst the City, Perimeter, and Riverside. Mr. Schottenstein stated that they have not reached an agreement with Perimeter at this point as to what their share should be. Mr. Geese also stated that he read that the road was going to be started in the spring. Mr. Jezerinac asked how the one -third cost share deal could include Riverside when they do not even own the land. Ms. Clarke stated that Staff's understanding is that the City, Perimeter, and Riverside and /or other property owners on the west side of Avery Road are each obligated for one -third of the cost. If one -third is not paid by Riverside and /or other property owners on the west side of Avery Road, the City would have to renegotiate the deal with Perimeter. She also stated that the City is not willing to pay more than one -third at this time. Because this was was an informal rezoning review, there was no vote taken. 10 -001 Z /PDP /FDP /CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Pinal Dcvclo_pmcm Plan /Conditional Usc Kroacr FUCI Station 7100 1- Iospital Drive Minutes of Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission April 7, 1988 Page 11 ;hn e bu r along Avery Road i created by landform sing mounding meeti the qu' ements established b ublin. Hedgerow is sed to cap the landf ms. Reiner expressed ncern for architect 1 control for conXdconcern in what- ever is built on th ots within the pare Mr. Berlin expres about conformance with e standards that ar set up. Mr. Smith s ed that they are looking for i t from commission a staff. A work sess" is to be set up with Commis on members Mr. Grace r. Jezerinac and Mr einer. Mr. R er asked if the ret center could be co mated with out par s arc tecturally. Mr. G1 n said that they rea y haven't gotten th far with JX yet. The first thing t t is being addressed ith the retail cent is the amount of area that will it on the site. The are looking at 250,0 sq. ft. They are looking at plan for a mall, not strip center, with set up as an "L" wi an anchor tore at each end (o being Big Bear). S ice access is to be separa from every day traf c. Reiner stated thatk6 feels the proposal 's an interesting lan use concept, but the crucial issu is the traffic probl This will be the,,>6st ingress point for Dublin d the traffic issue st be looked at care lly. Mr. Smith stated that th ea cannot be esponsible for solvi Dublin's traffic problems. y can work to improv the traffic flow fr its existing state or traffi that would be genera d with existing zoni At s point the meeting s adjourned for a f', e minute break. ZZ 5. Rezoning Application Z88 -004 - Riverside Medical Mall Ms. Clarke showed slides of the area and had the following comments: - Property is bounded by Post Road on the north, US 33 on the south and Avery Road on the east. Cape Cod Inn, zoned CC, Community Commercial, abuts the site but is not included in this application. Property behind it is also zoned CC and is included in this application. -Site includes 117 acres. -Two access points are proposed on Avery Road. -Land use includes 45 acres for a medical hospital complex, 30 acres for retail uses and the remaining 32 acres would be used for offices. Applicant is requesting a PCD, Planned Commerce District. - Applicant is also using Mr. Wilcox as a traffic consultant, but a traffic report has not been submitted to the City staff at this time. - Riverside Hospital representative has met with City staff to discuss a private/ public partnership for the ultimate improvement of Avery Road. Paul Willis, City Engineer, again expressed concern about the traffic problems in this area. Riverside Hospital is aware of these concerns and the same comments from the Perimeter Mall traffic discussion should be incorporated into this project as well. When this plan does come in as a final devel — --- t ^' ^- ---I- include storm water detention, storm water management io- oolz /rDp /rDP/cu Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plat /Conditional Use Kroger Fuci Station 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission April 7, 1988 Page 12 Mr. Bob Schottenstein, representing the developer, outlined the development plan for the project: -The developer, technically called O.G.C. Investment Development Co., is a non- profit subsidiary of Riverside Hospital. - Expressed Riverside's concern for traffic with the need for emergency service in and out of the area. Riverside will be working with developer on the other side of Avery Road and has retained the same traffic consultant. -The rezoning involves two parcels: One piece is presently owned by the Wirchanski family approximately 113 -114 acres zoned R, Rural; Second piece is owned by an individual by the name of Solomon, approximately 4 acres presently zoned CC, Community Commercial. - Riverside has been the hospital of choice for Dublin residents since 1961. - Property is more than Riverside Hospital needs. This facility is not expected to be anywhere near as large as the current hospital on S.R. 315. - Riverside is presently in contract to buy both parcels contingent upon zoning. Riverside does feel that PCD zoning is ideal because it allows them to see to it that the balance of the property is used in a way that they believe makes sense for this particular site. -Area consists of Sub -Area A, 32 acres of suburban office which wraps around at the top, Sub -Area B, the middle piece which is approximately 28 acres called retail, and Sub -Area C, the lower roughly 47 acres to be health care. Riverside intends to develop Sub -Area C over time, but they do not intend to develop the other two Sub - Areas. These parcels will be sold off to another developer. Mr. Jim Hauk of Bohm -NBBJ gave more detailed information of the Sub -Areas and access points into the areas. -Using same standards that were established on the other side of Avery Road to buffer Post Road. - Proposing a street tree program along the main roads. -Hope to develop a consistent pattern of development standards with architectural controls patterned on Perimeter Center. Steve Gerlach, Vice President of Riverside Hospital, outlined some of the plan refinements as follows: - Survey is currently underway, telephone interviews with 400 Dublin area house- holds to project what health care needs are and will be in the future. Also meeting with neighborhood civic associations to find out their health care needs. Plans have been received favorably. -At present, plans are not specific but envision a health care campus that could possible include physician's offices, out - patient or ambulatory diagnostic services, out - patient surgery, possibly urgent care, 24 -hour emergency services, and ultimately - -if demand exists - -a hospital on the site. Plan would be developed in phases that would be commensurate with development of community over the years. Mr. Grace asked if a projection had been done to determine tax dollars. This has not yet been done, but Mr. Schottenstein stated that it could be done if commission requested it. Commission is requesting it. Mr. Amorose noted that in looking at traffic, he would like to see Riverside put a link in the cloverleaf so that a right -hand turn could be done onto US 33 (west- .- bound). Mr. Schottenstein stated that it is his undf state control. 10- 0012 /PDP /RDP 1CU Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Final Development Plan /Conditional Use Kroger 1-uel Station se 7100 Hospital Drive Minutes of Meeting Planning & Zoning Commission April 7, 1988 Page 13 Mr. Gary Wilcox addressed the traffic situation involved with this area as well as the Perimeter Center area. -Mr. Wilcox feels that by the time any substantial amount of development is done on this site that the Perimeter Drive connection would happen so people will be able to get from Post Road to the site without going onto Avery Road. -Mr. Reiner feels that now is the time to consider the conclusion to the clover- leaf and other kinds of traffic solutions to the two stop lights. -Mr. Wilcox explained that he was originally retained by Riverside Hospital to study the area and then was also retained by the Perimeter Center developers to look at both sides of the area for general solutions. -Mr. Wilcox explained that a study was prepared for the City of Dublin and he took this detailed traffic information to talk to the state but was not allowed to make a presentation. -Mr. Reiner suggestedthat the developers get together with Harrison Smith to discuss this solution. -Ms. Rausch suggested that the study address the future impact of traffic coming from the west into Dublin as well. Mr: Jezerinac expressed concern about the sale of Sub -Areas A & B to other developers who may make it difficult to coordinate the whole project. Mr. Schottenstein noted that they would probably bind these design standards in the form of covenants so that whoever ends up owning the property at any time in the future would be subject to these standards. Mr. Jezerinac suggested that Riverside Hospital sell the areas as soon as possible to developers so they can attend these meetings and get the same understanding of what is expected of development in this area. Mr. Jezerinac addressed the possible sound problem of sirens close to a residential neighborhood. 7. Info 1 Rezoning Applica on Z88 -006 - Borro Corporation Chr' Cline, representin the Wilcox Road As ciates, requested a hange in the o e of the last two plications because esentation include oth rezonings epresenting a Comm ty effort between e two developers, e industrial and one a group of re 'dential developers and the land use an traffic presentat' is common to bo Because there i no single rezoning asification for I ustrial and Residenti areas, the two ap icants are working ery closely togeth on the separate a ications. The ch 'rman cleared this w' h commission membe and City staff an approved the reque to flip -flop Item o. 6 (Z88- 005 /DBS Wilcox Rd.) and It No. 7 (Z88 - 006 /Bo or Corp.). ris Cline stated t t applicant is loo g X ln ce on ether residential zoning is appropri e in this area as sign - Presentation of etailed land use pr osal: ea - close to free y, good tax base moving into higher ensity rend on into lower d sity residential Mr. Cline feels t t this land is virtually iden cal to thZstem fy plan that was 1.ished in Jan encompasses a and 850 ac -Ro plan X ale s exactly with pment plan s it exists f terchange road. Road stem the onnects with Hilli er Plan. ated that to- 001 /PDP /FDt) /CU Hilliard and MORPC. Rezoning/Prelimintuy Development Plan/ Filial Development Plan /Conditional Use ;e Kiogcr Fuel Station 7 1 100 Hospital Drive