035-79 Ordinance
~
. ~~ 1
I RECORD OF ORDINANCES ,t _
. -
National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. ~ Form No. 2806-A
Ordinance N 0 ..~.~____?1m.m P assed..m...J.UN.4..n.J9Z9..nn om.m..19 nm ..
AN ORD I NANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF ZON-
ING OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO THE PUD ZON I NG
r DISTRICT FROM THE R-I RESIDENTIAL ZONING
DISTRICT.
,
~ BE IT ORDAINED by the Counci I of the Vi I lage of Dubl in, State of
Ohio, 5 of the elected members concurring:
SECTION I . That the fol lowing described real estate, referred
to as "Donegal CI iffs" (See attached legal description, marked
Exhibit "A") situated in the Vii lage of Dubl in, State of Ohio,
sha II be, and it hereby IS, rezoned to the P.ll.D. Z on i n g D i st r i c1:
and shal I be subject to regulations and procedures contained In
Ordinance NO: 21-70 (Vi I lage of Dubl in Ohio Zoning Code) and
amendments thereto.
SECTION 2. The appl ication, Exhibit "B", the I ist of contiguous
propet'ty owners, Exhibit "C", location plat, Exhibit "D" and the
report of the Planning Commission, Exhibit "E" are al I Incorpor-
ated into, and made an official part of this Ordinance and said
real estate sha II be developed and used in accordance therewith.
SECTiON 3. That this Ordinance shal I take effect and be in force
from and after the earl iest period al lowed by law.
r- Passed this 1/'" day of :ZNlr , 1979.
11
~
\.,... adlw~~ ~~
Presiaent Pro Tempore
~~fi~icer
ATTEST:
!lA~ ~
Clerk - Treasurer
r
I
I
I
'-
""';'~'~"""~"~~''''''~'''',",~r"", ~ _ .u I .I "'~"''''~-~'-'-'"",,''" '''',.", "'-"-"""""''';."__iIIl~''~.,,l~.~.!fIi.' ',-R.., 1Un,lJ,. ..,1 j \I..: ,:1.,- - _' ".f' J:., "~,~~_""-''';'<'~_'J__'''_''.'';-j-_
l
. . I EXHIBIT A
. ,> I
-~ ,
DESCRIPTION OF 134.340 ACRES OF LAND I
ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF STATE ROUTE 745 (DUBLIN-BELLEPOINT ROAD) I
AND NORTH OF BELLAIRE AVENUE IN THE VILLAnE
OF DUBLIN, WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin. Village
of Dublin, Township of Washington, being in Virginia Military i
I Survey No. 2544 and containing 134.340 acres of land. more or I
less, said 134.340 acres being all of the lands conveyed
(undivided two-thirds interest) to Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) by,
Certificate of Transfer of record in Deed Book 3439, Page 187, I
r Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said 134.340 acres being/
more particularly described as follows:
I
'-- Beginning at a spike at the southwesterly corner of said I
I
Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands, said spike also being at the I
I point of intersection of the centerline of State Route 745
(Dublin-Bellepoint Road) with the southerly line of said Virginia
Military Survey No. 2544, said spike also being in a westerly
extension of the northerly line of Dublin Estates Subdivision No.
I 2, the subdivision plat of same being shown of record in Plat ,
,
Book 32, Page 4-A, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; I
Thence N 150 23' 00" W, with a westerly line of said Robert
L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands and with the centerline of said State
Route 745. a distance of 1304.44 feet to a spike;
Thence N 150 20' 31" W, with a westerly line of said Robert
L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands and with the centerline of said State
Route 745, a distance of 915.03 feet to a spike at the I
southeasterly corner of River Forest, the subdivision plat of ,
same being shown of record in Plat Book 28, Pages 46 and 47,
Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio;
Thence N 150 26' 03" W, with a westerly line of said Robert I
L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands, with the centerline of said State I
r Route 745 and with the easterly line of said River Forest, a
, distance of 366.17 feet to the northwesterly corner of said
I
'- I Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands, the same being in a southerly I
line of that tract of land referred to as TRACT '1 and described I
in a deed to Paul Varga and Sons, Inc., of record in Deed Book
1658, Page 99, Recorder's Office, Frankl~n County, OhioJ
Thence N 840 38' 18" E, with a northerly line of said Robert
L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands and with a southerly line of said I
TRACT '1, a distance of 827.23 feet to a point; I
i Thence N 840 23' 38" E, with a northerly line of said Robert
I
I L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands and with a southerly line of said I
, TRACT #1. a distance of 1338.76 feet to an iron pin at the
iI northeasterly corner of said Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands, I
'i the same being a t the southeasterly corner of said TRACT '1; I
j1 I
I; ,
Thence southwardly, with the easterly boundary of said Robert
i ~ L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands and with the westerly bank of the
Seioto RiVer, the following eight (8 ) courses and distances:
I I
I! 1) . S 70 32' 37" E, a distance of 134.55 feet to a point;
" ,
Ii I
.1 2) . S 130 34' 37" E, a distance of 321.62 feet to a point; ,
"
I" II I
,! 3) . S 280 34' 37" E, a distance of 196.27 feet to a point; ,
I! I
,I I
'-" II 4 ) . S 000 28' 37" E, a distance of 355.13 feet to a point;
I, I
"
Ii i
5) . S 160 51' 37" E, a distance of 395.65 feet to a point; I
II 6) . S 160 34' 35" E, a distance of 404.29 feet to a point;
II !
tl
I' i
I'
./ I
,
,
,
!I PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES ,
d ,
,I
I,
II .
II ,
'I !
II I
\l - I
- . I' May 10, 1978
I'
...... '\ DESCRIPTION OF 134.340 ACRES OF LAND. I
. . Cont1d
I
I
7) . S 70 511 35" E, a distance of 740.12 feet to a point; I
I
'I I
8). S 100 401 35" E, a distance of 529.22 feet to the
southeasterly corner of said Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands,
the same being in the southerly line of said Virginia Military I
Survey No. 2544, the same also being in the northerly line of
Dublin Estates Subdivision. the subdivision plat of same being
'I shown of record in Plat Book 27. Page 49-A, Recorder's Office, I
Franklin County, Ohio; I
,... 14" w, with the southerly line of said I
Thence N 820 031
~. 1
Robert L. Snouffer (et al 4) lands, with the northerly line of I
\.... ~ said Dublin Estates Subdivision, with the northerly line of said I
I Dublin Estates Subdivision No. 2 and with the same extended
I westerly, a distance of 2110.00 feet to the point of beginning I
I I
, and containing 134.340 acres of land, more or less.
I
I Subject to all rights-of-ways, easements and restrictions,
if any, of previous record. Also subject to all legal highways. I
! We hereby certify that the above description was prepared ,
II from information obtained from an actual field survey of the I
premises by Bauer, Borowitz & Merchant, Inc. and that said
description is correct.
,
I
r- By
i'
'-
I
.
I I
I
,I
Ii I
II
"
I, I
I
/: ;
I' I
Ii ,
I
I
,... II ,
I
,
I ,
,I
\- "
,i
!,
" I
I: I
d I
I;
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES I
I! ,
:1 I
Ii ,
'I I
. - . I
j
I
,I
I,
i; !
" -2 \ .'
- . ' '
.
VILLAGE OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
---~- - . -.- .. . -- _. ----. .....
AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT For P & ZC Use Only
OF THE VILLAGE OF DUBLIN fi\' Application No. :
ZONING DISTRlCT MAP ZM -79-00&
(Rec las sification of Land) ~~\' Date Filed: 1-1~
Fee Receipt No.
r Received by: ~,~
,
f -
'-
__ __ _ Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary - ----
TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Applicant, Donegal Cliffs ,
Being the owner (s), /l-e-e-&ee-{.&) of property located within the area proposed for
reclas sification of land/ special use or development, requests that the following
described land to be placed in the PUD Zoning Distri ct (5)/
Special District (s).
A. DESCRlPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED
1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following: )
r- a. Lot(s)/ Reserve (s) of
I;
\- ,
a recorded plat, with an area of Acres/ Square feet.
b. Beginning at a point along
(street or other)
and being feet in a N SEW (circle)
direction from the (specify) of
(street or othe r), and thence having a dimension of
from the (specify) of
(street or other), and having an area of
.
c. The tract of land containing Acres and bounded by:
r (specify) on the N SEW (ci rcle)
~.
I
\... (specify) on the N SEW (circle)
(specify) on the N SEW (circle)
(specify) on the N W E W (circle)
d.. Attached 1e8a1 d..cription: YES x NO
Page 1 of 3
- ~ {- 'i
,
Page 2 of ZM
Map of proposed Zoning District boundaries:
Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet
of not less than 8- 1/2 x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map
shall be identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land.
Th.e map shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five
hundred (500) feet beyond the limits of the proposed change.
r To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right of way, easements and
other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall
I
\.... be fully dimensioned.
The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District
Boundaries_
List all owner~ of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street
from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those
appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list.
NAME ADDRESS
See Attached
C B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRmED LAND.
I. Proposed Use or Development of the Land:
i
Single-Family Residential I
I
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL I
DISTRICTS submission of three (3) copies of a Development
Plan and other documents and two (2) copies shall be retained
as a permanent public record if approved.
For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be
helpful to the review of this application.
,
Plans and Exhibits submitted:
,
Plot Plan ; Building Plan_; Development Plan-,--; Sketch_; i
Photographs_ ; Other (specify)
Exhibits per Par. 450.061
r 2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the
. existing and probable future land use character of the. vicinity.
\...
The existing area is single-family residential or ooen 2round without
utilities or streets meeting village standards. This develooment would
continue and maintain a very high quality of single-family residence
with all services underground and meeting development standards of the
, 11
I
village.
Page Z of 3 ;:ag~s
-
<. "
-
..' '. i ..... ......1
. .
3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the Village
Council within the last two (Z) years? YES X NO. ,
If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration. Request changed from
R-3 to PUD
r
t
'- C. AFFIDAVIT
Before cor:npleting this application and executing the following affidavit,
it is recommended that this application be discussed with the Building,lnspector
to insure completeness and accuracy.
APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN,
I (WE) 'k>\..U~D l>~nQ.. SM\{"lL-
being duly sworn, depose and say that I am/we a:re the owner (s )/les8e~ (5) of
land included in the application and that the foregoing statement herein con-
tained and attached, and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the
best of my/our ability present the arguments in behalf of the application here.
r with submitted and that the statements and attached exhibits above referred:
to are in all respects true and correct to the best or my/our knowledge andbeliei.
\- .
l )~ )l-A ~ I
: (signature) , - '..'
. :;, i ~ , ,
j :~t i
I"!
i ,
" ;. - ~
I
f'o ec~ ,=>St. \
\
(mailing addre s s) I
I i
DJP.7Ll IV () Me! 4 ~ "
Phone: 89'\ - 'e;~ 1 C
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 /$1 day of ~ ' 19 77.
(j
~'~"~
Notary Public ,'....;,': [. ,':(': :, :'.<'
~<:. r:"::--, ~{Y t- ~ :j '.: r~ '.. : j....,'1 ':; ':'.>
r Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signato:r,YL::.:,.- ':, , ",'--'- ':~3. ;',:-;-~
t
,
L (name) ( address) (telephone)
______.._..__...._.._.._______.._______DO NOT WRlTE BELOW THIS LINE--------------e
D. RECORD OF ACTION
1. Withdrawn Held to
(date) (date)
Z. P & ZC: Date of Hearing .... ,
Approved ; Disapproved Modifie d
3. Village Council: Date of Hearing
,App1.'ovec. ; D~.!ila:?,?:o-ovec Moo.~H,ed.
-
Pa..ae J of 3 Da,;,;:ea
.
.- . -, .-
- .." -, ...... tl~:\C"
.
William C. and J~ssie Gro~nlg~r E. Maloy
P.O. Box 3629 7781 Riverside Drive
Hayword, California 94540 Powell, Ohio 43065
Charles E. and Dora N. Milam D. L. li. S. K. Davis
7961 Riverside Drive 7775 Riverside Drive
Powell, Ohio 43065 Dublin, Ohio 43017
Donald A. and E. R. Freytag R. W. and J. H. Hitchens
r 7955 Riverside Drive 7741 Riverside Drive
Powell, Ohio 43065 Dublin, Ohio 43017
\.,. Robert E. and Vera M. Parker J. D. and V. S. Bradham
7915 Riverside Drive 7723 Riverside Drive
Powe 11, Ohio 43065 Powell, Ohio 43065
Lorenzo D. and Joann Sheets Samuel R. li. Ann M. Bumgarner
7901 Riverside Drive Columbus Savings li. Loan
Powe 11, Ohio 43065 155 North High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Jeffrey T. & D. L. Bango
938 Joost Avenue Lewis E. & Helen G. Thornton
Columbus, Ohio 43229 8055 Dublin Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Mack J. & C. W. Parkhill
7879 Riverside Drive Mary L. Pinkerton & Wayne H. Rausch
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 5176 Ashford Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
William E. and Y. A. Pfeiffer
7871 Riverside Drive Rick L. & Sandra M. Long
Powell, Ohio 43065 7630 Bellaire Avenue
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
Thomas J. and Marianne H. O'Brien
r 7859 Riverside Drive Robert G.& Ann F. Adams
Powell, Ohio 43065 7605 Bellaire Avenue
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
L Charles E. Miller
1000 Urlin Avenue Sherri L. Netto
Columbus, Ohio 43212 Park Financial, Inc.
1550 Old Henderson Road
Harris C. Anthony Box 20388
7827 Riverside Drive Columbus, Ohio 43220
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
Joseph G. & Dorothy Manns
Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company 7570 Dublin Bellpoint Road
215 North Front Street Dublin, Ohio 43017
Columbus, Ohio 43215
L. C. and L. L. Gordon
7791 Riverside Drive
Powell. Ohio 43065
DONEGAL CLIFFS
WILLIAM KEETHLER
Kellam & Smith Architects/Planners
r
'''I- ,--
w_~..
.. ,. ' . . -
. . A :2 , ,I ""1
j c
Paul Varga and Sons, Inc. Hoy D. Baldwin
1540 Grenoble 4386 Bellaire Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43221 Dublin, Ohio 43017
William and Leota L. Hogg James M. and Sue H. Trammell
(Address unknown per county 7660 Bellaire Avenue
tax department.) Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
W. J. Jr. and R. M. Kelley Rita J. Sabatino
C 7979 Dublin Road 7640 Bellaire Avenue
Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017
Beatrice C. Dunn Denise E. Morgan
1857 Collingswood 1963 Wickford
Columbus, Ohio 43221 Columbus, Ohio 43221
John S. and C. G. C. Kobacker George T. and Francis M. Owens
7897 Dublin Road 8219 Riverside Drive
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 Powell, Ohio 43065
Harry and Mary R. Carpenter Richard H. Brandon
7815 Dublin Road 8211 Riverside Drive
Dublin, Ohio 43017 Powell, Ohio 43065
Robert P. and Anna M. Erwin Louis L. and Rosemary Marsteller
7805 Dublin Road 8201 Riverside Drive
Dublin, Ohio 43017 Powell, Ohio 43065
Curtis E. and Jeannie C. Rowe Richard L. Loveland
6238 Alrojo Street 8159 Riverside Drive
Worthington, Ohio 43085 Powell, Ohio 43065
Evergreen Co. Kenneth J. and Dorothy A. Breckler
c/o Michael E. Moritz 8100 Riverside Drive
r 100 East Broad Street Powell, Ohio 43065
Columbus, Ohio 43215
\.... John W. and B. A. Dobyns
Jack D. and Shirley H. Walters 8007 Riverside Drive
4434 Bellaire Avenue Powell, Ohio 43065
Dublin, Ohio 43.017
R. H. and C. E. Bethel
Betty O. Miller 1151 S. Federal Highway
Route 1 Pompano Beach, Florida 33062
Athens, Ohio 45701
Judy C. Ellis
James R. and G. R. Dixey 7979 Riverside Drive
4400 Bellaire Avenue Powell, Ohio 43065
Dublin, Ohio 43017
r- ~
"";0,"' , ."~ u.........,,'" . .
~ " -
. . . . .
. ....... 3 ,<;--1 "i
Dolores A. Glein~
Buckeye Federal Savings & Loao
36 E. Gay Street
Columbu6, Ohio 43215
James F. & M. M. Bruce
4455 Bellaire Avenue
Dublin, Ohio 4301 7
r, Barbara A. Guy
, \' 7192 Dublin Road
, Dublin, Ohio 4 301 7
\.,.
John A. Guy II
8000 Riverside Drive
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Dean C. & Carolyn Marolf
4545 Summit View
Dublin, Ohio 4 30 1 7
A. J. & A. M. Dal1a6
3265 McKinley Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43204
Lawrence J. & M. W. Nespor
State Savings Company
Northland Branch
1500 Morse Road
Columbus, Ohio 43224
r
f
'-
r"
_'"
.. -. ----,~_."~--_.----,--
j' :,
Exf ,,, "
L (J C If T/~ 1..1 /'LA r: .,Z)
r-- ?A(/L r1A~t;A ..,.. S~'-I'.r
----
-, -
~
~
: \
,..., i~1
!-.t
:'1
'-" I \
I' i
I :
i~l 6'!t.7 Ac.
i~!
:Cji \
I j
,,.. i
it'l
: I
i 1
:_1 (J) i
: ct I
.'1 )
," i fl
' ,. ,
,I (
- ,
01 ~
...... ~
~l
",,1
I ()
~\ -
C7271Jc. ~
I~
..
10
"
'-
:
,
'---'-- '-..
~, -.
-.
i
/
I
r
~_~""""t""'_~1f . . "Ii!t!.~ -'IIi _ PJI,_ .' __~__~~.~1liI;'<i'!,~'~;,j",,,--,,,, '-""'"';<;....---l;.-:,,~ l'll)'ii'l.,l; - __ -~ -~".;.._.:'. __ .TI.(.I__~*-..-4;_""""'...'d_""__',--&""_,~,"~"""",--,,~, __ ..,,'~._;...""'- ,____..,.
"-;;,.
-'
~~0~ ()~ ff f,
( INCORPORATED E
Apr i I 4, 1979 Dublin, Ohio 43017
/'. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~'
\.
The Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission met in Regular session
: April 3, 1979, with the following members present: Callahan,
: Caudy, Karrer, Macklin, Moffitt. Also present were Solicitor
I Gunner, Engineer Wolfe, Planner Helman and Mr. Sheldon as Acting
Secretary.
The minutes of the Regular meeting of March 6, 1979, and the
Special meeting of March 20, 1979, were read and after appropri-
ate corrections were made the minutes were approved, as amended.
j
i ITEM I. Proposed rezonin of 12.2 acres - corner of Sawmill and
Bri~ht. A number of letters and two 2 petitions were read, all
_, asking the Commission and the Counci I to deny this zoning request.
(_! Mr. Helman explained what is happening, or has happened, to the
area east of Sawmi II in the City of Columbus, a lot of which IS
1 commercially oriented. Mr. Harrison Smith, speaking for the ap-
. plicants, presented the reasons his clients thought the location
i was appropriate for commercial zoning. Mr. Caudy suggested that
I perhaps the Village Council should have the Planner develop a
I r "Northeast Quad Study'. pr i or to any changes in zon i ng be i ng pro-
I j cessed for this area. Mr. Ron Jezerinac, speaking for a group of
'- Village residents, opposed the zoning for a number of reasons In-
cluding the road width and condition of Bright Road and did not
want to see a precedent set with commercial zoning on said Road.
A number of other persons spoke basically suppo~ting the reason-
ing of Mr. Jezerinac. Most of those who spoke also requested that
Counci I authorize the preparation of a "Northeast Quad Study."
j The question arose as to why this item did not appear on the
i Agenda as printed in the Dublin Forum. (It had been listed in
the Forum for the February meeting, but was tabled). Mr. Callahan
moved that no decision be made until the May meeting because of
the possible non-conformance of the Sunshine Law. Mr. Macklin
i seconded the motion which passed. Mr. Moffitt then voted to re-
1 call the item and it, was seconded by Mr. Caudy. AI I except Mr.
I Callahan voted for the recaJ I. Mr.Caudy moved that the Commis-
II (- sion recommend that Council deny this request for rezoning, sec-
onded by Karrer and Roll Cal I on the motion was Callahan, yes,
, Caudy, yes, Karrer, yes, Macklin, yes, Moffitt, abstain.
!
1
1
,i~
~
IN,H ,~~_l;.,4!):".., ,"I'~;_mJlilll~H. .~ T__-;~_,ji~~':_~"""'~F'C" ~,'~-.~ ?ill!li\"'liH!"',,.~IMQUJl'._ 1,_,l..l.ri:IJ'l"~11:jl._,,_,'~,1;,.tilI:.,,_ ~,y
.
~
. .
-2-
ITEM 2. Proposed rezonin~ of 11.4 acres on Sawmill and Martin.
f Mr. Harrison Smith spoke on behalf of his clients and basically
I
\ spoke of eliminating any curb cuts on Martin Road. Since Mr.
Sm i t h intends to ask the Commission for permission to amend the
application for P.U.D. zoning at the May meeting, he requested
the matter be tabled until he can present the amended application
at the next meeting. It was moved, seconded and unanimously ap-
proved to table the matter until the May meeting.
f""'"
'I ITEM 3. Final Development Plan - Waterford Phase 6.
l
After the presentation was made, a question arose on the omission
of sidewalks on the plans. A II members were of the opinion that
sidewalks should be added on both sides of Pebble Creek and Long-
branch Drives and at least on one side of "Reserve AW, and side-
walks on "Reserve A" should confor~ to the requirements as spec-
ified for Phase 4. It was also stated that stormwater provisions
should be made conforming to M.O.R.P.C. guidelines, as adopted by
Village Counci I. Mr. Callahan moved, seconded by Mr. Caudy to
approve this Final Development Plan, subject to the applicant a-
mending the plans for the above cited additions. Roll Ca II vote
was unanimous in favor of the motion.
I TE M 4. Final Development Plan - Waterford Phase 7.
After the presentation was made, aga i n the quest i on on om i ss i on of .
<=~: sidewalks from the plans was raised. A II members were of the opin-
ion that sidewalks should be added on both sides of Longbranch and
Monterey Drives. A II members were also of the opinion that no lots
should have access onto Frantz Road and that the plans should be
changed to eliminate those shown on said plans. It was also stated
that stormwater provisions should be made conforming to the M.O.R.P.C.
t""" gu ide lines, as adopted by Village Council. Mr. Caudy moved, seconded
by Mr. Callahan to approve this Final Development Plan subject to
",-. the applicant amendrng the plan for the above cited additions or
deletions. Roll Ca II vote was unanimous in favor of the motion.
I TE M 5. Final Development Plan - Lot 5 - Metro Center.
Prior to the presentation Mr. Moffitt questioned if Council had
approved the final plat for the streets in Metro Center. It was
attested that. Council had so approved in January 1979. Mr. Bassler
of Banning and Pickett then made the presentation on architectural
designs for the buildings, etc. Mr. Caudy moved, seconded by Mr.
Macklin to approve this Final Development Plan. Ro II Ca II vote was
unanimous in favor of the motion.
ITEM 6. Preliminary Plat for Lots I through 12 "Corbin Mills Sub-
division on Frantz Road.
Mr. Helman pointed out that two rots would have to be replatted to
reflect required frontage. Mr. Karrer moved, seconded by Mr. Mack-
lin to recommend approval of this Preliminary Plat to Council sub-
....
"'IU " ~-IIl~,~"'....__. -- Ill'. .1.1. ," _ -,,11. -.'' - T_:~'''''-;'--'''"'' 'ilr'li' .. );f_~ .... __~ L"k.. ~.,.4 ",,4 - ",4.. .~
",~",~""""""""'T.'''"'''-''''_"*,,~''''''''~''',",,,,,f____j~-''';''i.
-
.
.
-3-
ject to the two lots being replatted. Roll Ca II vote was un-
animous in favor of the motion.
ITEM 7. Architectural Plans - Lot 25 - Waterford Phase 8.
After the presentation was made Mr. Moffitt pointed out that
there were no dimensions or data submitted for St. Andrews Drive.
Although it is to be a private Drive, it must conform to Village
,.. specifications including sidewalks and curbs. Mr. Helman stated
that we would perfer more of a mixture in the proposed landscape
t materials opposed to all Evergreens along the perimeters. It
~ was also pointed out that stormwater provisions should be made
conforming to M.O.R.P.C. guidelines, as adopted by Village Council.
Mr. Ca II ahan moved, seconded by Mr. Caudy to approve these Arch-
itectural Plans subject to all items cited above. Vote on the
motion was unanimous in favor.
ITEM 8. Proposed rezonin~ of .874 acres on Dublin-Granville Road
to S. O.
Mr. Moffitt stated that the David Road area, of which this .874
acres is a part, is deed restricted for residential use on I y. Mr.
Caudy moved, seconded by Mr. Callahan to recommend that Council
deny this request for rezoning. Vote on the motion was unanimous
to recommend dispproval.
/--
i ITEM 9. Variance request for .82 acre lot on Grandee Cliffs.
\._-
The lot in reference does not conform to the minimum lot size re-
quirements for a single family home but since the lot is platted
and of record, Mr. Callahan moved, seconded by Mr. Caudy to recom-
mend that the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the variance. Vote
on the motion was unanimous in favor.
",....
ITEM 10. Preliminary Development Plan - "Donegal CI iffs" P.U.D.
''"-' Mr. Dan Smith had a slide presentation of another development site
that reflected the manner in which he planned to develop "Donegal
C I i ffs." He then reviewed the entire Preliminary Plan relating to
setbacks, lot sizes, main entrances, road widths, right-of-ways,
sidewalks, etc. He also related to a passive oriented Park i n the
southeast corner of the subject property. Access to said Park site
was discussed and a curb cut would be provided where required by the
V i I I age. Stormwater retention was discussed but because of the slope
of the land toward the river, little or none may be required. The
app I i cant wi I I however, study the needs in the areas discussed.
Discussion was held on the establishment of walkways or trails along
the river and the applicant proposes none bacause of the location.
Mr. Mack I in moved, seconded by Mr. Caudy that the Commission recom-
mend approval to Village Council. Vote on the motion was unanimous
I " in favor.
\
ITEM II. Mrs. Neidhart - Specifications on Sidewalks.
Mrs. Neidhart proposes the use of a new decorative sidewalk material
specification in the Village. The Engineer is to make a recommendation
t1'"
''''''''11 ~.... "~"MW.W -lI. .. '1>\1 1/ 1. .. J!'i"_,~-,-_..,..".. d_~"',_., I__----:~. .ff.l>, ,-"1 __ --t;, I!l.U.-q,,_~ Jj.. tIT ,~~. ~, .. " 11i"'l'ill~"'~~'M'"",,,"~""
,
.
-4-
( and prepare un amendment to the Standard Construction Regulations
, to P&Z at the May meeting for study and a future recommendation to
,
V i II age Counc i I . A II voted in fa~or of this proposal.
Mr. Cal lahan moved that the proposed Sign Ordinance be removed from
the table for discussion. A II voted . J:: Mr. Callahan then
In .ilvor.
. seconded by Mr. Karrer, to refer said Ordinance back t6 Village
r movea,
Counc i I with no recommendations from the Commission. A II voted In
L favor of the motion.
Chairman Moffitt adjourned the meeting at I I : 48 P. M -
o. J. Moffitt - Chairman Sherman Sheldon - Acting Secretary
.
--
(I"',
'-'
,
~ ~IT "I""-'~~'''_'''''''''''''~''''_'<''''_-''~. I illll ,IW_ U ~~: If n,~.lU l~! ,.-.-
, "",.m... l-_~~~~"_u, ,r.m", ',<f'