95-07 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton L egal Blank, Inc. Form No. 30041
�95 -07 No. Passed .20
AMENDING SECTION 153.053 (G) "MODIFICATIONS TO
APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. "OF THE
DUBLIN CODIFIED ORDINANCES (CASE NO. 07- 118ADM)
WHEREAS, it is necessary from time to time to amend the Code in order to protect
the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, Section 153.053(G) of the Dublin Codified Ordinances provides for the
administrative approval of minor modifications to final development plans for approved
Planned Unit Development projects; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Code amendment is to clarify those conditions under
which administrative approvals of minor modifications to final development plans for
approved Planned Unit Development may be granted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment on
November 15, 2007 and recommends adoption because it serves to improve the health,
safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Dublin.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, of the elected members concurring that:
Section 1. Section 153.021(A) is hereby amended and shall provide as follows:
§ 153.053 PROCEDURES
(G) Modifications to approved final development plans. Requested modifications to
i
approved final development plans shall be reviewed according to the following:
(1) Administrative approval. The Director, in administering the approved final
development plan and development text, may authorize minor plan modifications to
building layouts, parking arrangements, sign locations, lighting, and other site - related
improvements that are required to correct any undetected errors or address changes to the
site made necessary during construction, provided the modifications remain consistent
with the purpose of the approved final development plan.
(a) No modifications shall be made that increases the permitted density of
development or add to the list of permitted or conditional uses.
(b) Modifications deemed minor may include such changes as:
1. Minor adjustments in lot lines provided no additional lots are
created and required setbacks are maintained;
2. Minor adjustments in the location of and layout of parking lots
provided the perimeter setbacks, yards and buffers are maintained;
3. Minor adjustments in building footprints up to 10% in total floor
area of the originally a roved building, heigh h
pp g, g g t(s) or floor plans, that do not alter
the character or intensity of the use
4. Substitution of landscaping materials specified in the landscape
plan with comparable materials of an equal or greater size;
5. Redesigning and /or relocating stormwater management facilities
provided that general character and stormwater capacities are maintained;
6. Redesigning and /or relocating landscape mounds, provided that
the same level and quality of screening is maintained;
7. Minor modifications to the sign face, landscaping and lighting,
provided the other sign requirements of the final development plan are maintained;
8. Minor changes in building g g or colors that are similar to and
have the same general appearance comparable to or of a higher quality as the material
approved on the final development plan.
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc.
95 -07
Ordinance No.
1
Passed
9. Changes required by outside agencies such as the County, State, or
Federal departments.
10. Other minor modifications deemed by the Director that do not alter
the basic design or any specific conditions imposed as part of the original approval.
(c) The Director shall report approved modifications to the Planning and
Zoning Commission. The Director may submit any modification to the Planning and
Zoning Commission that would otherwise be considered minor if the Director finds that
the overall extent and effect of the proposed modification should be reviewed by the
Commission.
(2) Board of Zoning Appeals Variances.
(a) Any request for a variance to the development text pertaining to an
individual single - family dwelling shall be reviewed according to the procedures set forth
in § 153.231.
(b) Requests for establishing a model home within the Planned Development
District shall be reviewed according to the requirements of § 153.098.
(3) Planning and Zoning Commission approval.
1
(a) Modifications other than those listed in division (G)(1) and (2) above not
determined by the Director to be minor shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Modifications may be approved provided the Commission finds that the
requested changes are compatible with the surrounding development and that the
modifications remain consistent with the preliminary development plan.
Fonn No. 30043
Page 2 20
(b) Any requested changes shall be indicated on an amended final
development plan. An application for an amended final development plan shall follow the
review procedures for final development plan review set forth in division (E) of this
section. If approved, those amendments to the final development plan shall supersede the
originally approved final development plan.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect on the earliest date provided by law.
Passed this day of 3 aVi Q , 2008.
I „
Mayor — Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
6_1 - at��
Clerk of Council
CITY OF DUBLIN_
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 - 410 -4490
Memo
To: Members of City Council
From: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager! Jam -
Date: December 21, 2007
Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use & Long Range Planning
Re: Ordinance 95 -07, Zoning Code Amendment re Planned Unit Development
Administrative Approvals
Request
This is a request for a second reading and adoption of Ordinance 95 -07. A copy of the proposed
amendment is attached with the changes to the current Code language indicated. No changes
were made following the first reading.
Section 153.053(G) of the Zoning Code permits the Director of Land Use & Long Range
Planning to review, "minor design modifications that are required to correct any undetected errors
or that are consistent with the purpose of the approved final development plan." The proposed
amendment clarifies existing provisions and adds language allowing the Director to consider
other minor modifications that do not alter the basic design or change any of the conditions of
approval. It also permits the Director to bring forward even minor changes if they are deemed
sufficiently important to warrant a review by the Commission.
Recommendation of Planning and Zoning Commission
At its November 15 work session, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval
of the amendment to Council. The Commission discussed the need for additional flexibility for
administrative approval of minor changes based on applications that have come before them that
do not meet the exacting criteria for administrative action, but nonetheless are very minor in
nature.
As part of its review, the Commission further clarified the modification provisions related to
stormwater management facilities, requiring that the general character and stormwater capacities
be maintained, and to the provision on landscape mounds, requiring that they maintain their
screening effect if altered. The Commission will also be regularly informed of approved
administrative modifications to provide direction to Planning on acceptable minor changes.
Description
Currently, the Code imposes tight limits on modifications that may be administratively approved.
This has resulted, at times, in very minor changes being forced to go through the complete
amended final development plan process, causing unnecessary delays, as well as encumbering
Memo to City Council re Ordinance 95 -07
December 21, 2007
Page 2
the time of the Planning and Zoning Commission, applicants and the public. While it is
necessary to ensure that changes that have significant effect on a development continue to be
appropriately reviewed, the limitations of the current language do not permit sufficient latitude
for minor changes.
The proposed changes clarify existing language to permit additional flexibility in the
administrative review process. The proposed amendment would continue to prohibit any changes
to the approved development text; where specific requirements are listed and changes are
desired, a rezoning will still be necessary. Further, Land Use & Long Range Planning is required
to report administrative approvals so the Planning and Zoning Commission can evaluate their
nature and further refine the language for what may constitute a minor modification.
Recommendation
Planning recommends approval of Ordinance 95 -07.
REDLINED VERSION
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
§ 153.053 PROCEDURES
(G) Modifications to approved final development plans. Requested modifications to
approved final development plans shall be reviewed according to the following:
(1) Administrative approval. The Director, in administering the approved final
development plan and development teat may authorize minor plan modifications
to building layouts, parking arrangements, sign locations, lighting, and other site -
related improvements that are required to correct any undetected errors or *144 are
address changes to the site made necessary during construction, provided the
modifications remain consistent with the purpose of the approved final
development plan.
(a) £ueh - No modifications shall n a t a be made that increases in ift+ensitt
the permitted density of development or °aai s add to the list of
permitted or conditional uses.
(b) o...t, ffle d ' 4a .,.t:,...,, °l 14A Iim_4 d. 4w —Modifications deemed minor may
include such changes as
Minor adjustments in lot lines provided no additional lots are
created and required setbacks are maintained
wee. Minor adjustments in the location and layout
narking lots nrovided the nerimeter setbacks. vards and buffers are
maintained
3. Minor ,.,ju s t mefAs in building k L t' ` Minor adjustments in
building footprints up to 10% in total floor area of the originally
approved building, building heights) or floor plans, that do not
alter the character or intensitv of the use:
4. Substitution of landscaping materials specified in the landscape
plan with comparable materials of an equal or greater size
5. Redesigning and/or relocating stormwater management facilities
provided that general character and stormwater capacities are
maintained
6. Redesigning and/or relocating landscape mounds, provided that the
same level and quality of screening is maintained:
,...t: ens t the design o f s i in th s f..,.,.
8-lopmefA plan,
'Fi ffe _ -ems d e d.
, Minor modifications to the sign face.
PROPOSED CODE SECTION
landscaping and lighting, provided the other sign requirements of
the final development plan are maintained
8. Minor changes in building material or colors that are similar to and
have the same general appearance comparable to or of a higher
q uality as the material approved on the final development plan;
9. Changes required by outside agencies such as the County, State, or
Federal departments.
10. Other minor modifications deemed by the Director that do not alter
the basic design or anv specific conditions imposed as part of the
original approval
(c) The Director of report approved modifications to the
Planning and Zoning Commission. The Director may submit any
modification to the Planning and Zoning Commission that would
otherwise be considered minor if the Director finds that the overall extent
and effect of the proposed modification should be reviewed by the
Commission.
(2) Board of Zoning Appeals Variances.
(a) Any request for a variance to the development text pertaining to an
individual single - family dwelling shall be reviewed according to the
procedures set forth in § 153.231.
(b) Requests for establishing a model home within the Planned Development
District shall be reviewed according to the requirements of § 153.098.
(3) Planning and Zoning Commission approval.
(a) Modifications other than those listed in division (G)(1) and (2) above not
determined by the Director to be minor shall be submitted to the Planning
and Zoning Commission. Modifications may be approved provided the
Commission finds that the requested changes are compatible with the
surrounding development and that the modifications remain consistent
with the preliminary development plan.
(b) Any requested changes shall be indicated on an amended final
development plan. An application for an amended final development plan
shall follow the review procedures for final development plan review set
forth in division (E) of this section. If approved, those amendments to the
final development plan shall supersede the originally approved final
development plan.
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF DUBLIN_
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614 - 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 - 410 -4490
Memo
To: Members of City Council
From: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager
Date: December 6, 2007
Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use & Long Range Planning
Re: Ordinance 95 -07, Planned Unit Development Administrative Approvals
Summary
The current Code Section 153.053(G) permits the Director of Land Use & Long Range Planning
to review "minor design modifications that are required to correct any undetected errors or that
are consistent with the purpose of the approved final development plan." The Planning and
Zoning Commission at its November 19` work session recommended to Council changes to this
language. As part of its review the Commission added further clarifications to the modification
provisions related to stormwater management facilities, requiring that the general character and
stormwater capacities be maintained; and to the provision on landscape mounds, requiring that
they maintain their screening effect if altered.
Currently, the Code imposes tight limits on modifications that may be administratively approved.
This has resulted, at times, in very minor changes being forced to go through the complete
amended final development plan process, causing unnecessary delays, as well as encumbering
the time of the Planning and Zoning Commission, applicants and the public. While it is
necessary to ensure that changes that have significant effect on a development continue to be
appropriately reviewed, the limitations of the current language do not permit sufficient latitude
for minor changes.
The proposed changes clarify some of the existing language to permit some additional flexibility
to the administrative review process. The proposed amendment would continue to prohibit any
changes to the actual development text; where specific requirements are listed. When such
changes are desired, a rezoning will still be necessary. Further, Land Use & Long Range
Planning is required to report administrative approvals so the Planning and Zoning Commission
can evaluate their nature and further refine the language for what may constitute a minor
modification.
Additions to the current language permit the Director to identify other minor modifications not
specifically listed, provided they do not alter the basic design or change any of the conditions of
approval. It also permits the Director to bring forward even minor changes if they are deemed
sufficiently important to warrant a review by the Commission.
Recommendation
Planning recommends approval of Ordinance 95 -07 at the second reading/public hearing on
January 2, 2008.
CITY OF DUBLIN-
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
NOVEMBER 15, 2007
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
6. Planned Unit Development Administrative Approvals Administrative Request
07- 118ADM Zoning Code Amendment
Proposal: Amendment to the City of Dublin Zoning Code, Chapter
153, § 153.053, Procedures
Request: Review and recommendation for approval to City Council
for amended language for Code Section 153.053.
Applicant: City of Dublin.
Planning Contact: Steve Langworthy, Director.
Contact Information: (614) 410 -4653; Langworthy@dublin.oh.us
MOTION: To approve this Administrative Request to modify Zoning Code Section 153.053
(G), as requested in the draft ordinance.
VOTE: 6-0.
RESULT: This Administrative Request to modify Zoning Code Section 153.053 was
approved as presented in the draft ordinance with minor modifications. It will be forwarded to
City Council with an approval recommendation.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
Steve Langw+orthy
Director
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 15, 2007 — Minutes
Draft
6. Planned Unit Development Administrative Approvals Administrative Request
07- 118ADM Zoning Code Amendment
Steve Langworthy there have been minor cases coming before the Commission as amended final
development plans, which may not need to be reviewed by the Commission. He said that this
Code change is trying to clarify the language to determine what really needs to be reviewed and
approved by the Commission. He said Planning will be more diligent in reporting minor
modifications as they are approved administratively and give the Commission a sense of what
type of changes are being approved. He said staff is looking for guidance to determine if and
how this process could work.
Mr. Gerber said that the process used to include a report given at the beginning of the meeting
stating what were and were not minor modifications. He said that while this type of reporting
worked it slowed down the process.
Mr. Fishman said he would like Planning to approach the Commission, so together it can be
determined if it is okay to make a decision administratively. Mr. Zimmerman was concerned
that that would slow down the application process. Mr. Langworthy said the only way the idea
would work is if Planning did not have to put a Commission packet together. Mr. Walter said
the proposed solution is good. He said he would like to put a square footage limit in place for
administrative approvals. Mr. Langworthy said he thought a percentage should be put in place
until the additional modification goes over a certain percentage.
Mr. Fishermen said he was uncomfortable with one person making a decision for the City. Ms.
Amorose Groomes said she is uncomfortable with Planning making certain decisions without
obtaining the consent of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Fishman recalled several
cases where stormwater management had been redesigned, it was approved administratively. He
said once this is changed, it looks nothing like it was intended and the Commission has no idea
the plan was modified.
Mr. Gerber said Sections 3 and 10 should be discussed because very minor things that come to
Commission do not need to be regulated by them. Mr. Walter said when water features and
signs are modified, they need to come before the Commission, but minor changes should not.
Mr. Fishman said what is being considered minor is very subjective. Ms. Amorose Groomes
said she would like to see an administrative report that lists questions and answers provided by
staff.
Mr. Gerber asked what other jurisdictions are doing in this situation. Jennifer Readler said some
municipalities do not have minor modifications codified and they are done administratively
without the guidance of the minor modification language.
Mr. Fishman said if projects can be fixed without changing the appearance he is okay with
administrative decisions.
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 15, 2007 — Minutes
Draft
Mr. Saneholtz said the people in the field need to be able to make an educated decision in
regards to the grey area. Mr. Zimmerman agreed stating that when construction begins,
adjustments to the original plans may be needed.
Mr. Walter said Sections 5 and 6 need to be changed to have similar language as the other
sections.
Mr. Fishman said he would like to see some system to determine if a change is minor or not. Mr.
Gerber said at every meeting, Planning will provide an administrative report and if staff makes a
decision on an issue which the Commission does not feel is minor, then there will be recourse.
Ms. Amorose Groomes said she was comfortable with staff making administrative decisions as
long as the Commission is presented with an administrative report.
Mr. Walter asked how many minor changes Planning reviews on a regular basis. Mr.
Langworthy said one or two in Planned Unit Developments.
Mr. Gerber read paragraph G (1)(b) and asked Mr. Gunderman why the word shall was used.
Mr. Langworthy said the word may can be used instead.
Mr. Langworthy said in the administrative report, he will bring minor issues to the Commission
because the ten percent change may have an impact. He asked if 10,000 square feet can be
added to Section 3. Mr. Fishman said an exact percentage would be better.
Mr. Langworthy asked if adding verbiage about screening would suit the Commission. Mr.
Gerber said if it is an engineering difficulty, then these things are allowed to be done. Ms.
Amorose Groomes asked Mr. Gerber to define engineering difficulty.
Barbara Cox said when plans come to the Commission, they are not an exact depiction of what
the project will be. She said if there is a change during the Commission review, the plans may
be changed in a way which will affect the calculations. Ms. Cox said that at the point of
construction, the applicant should have done enough research to know what problems they will
face during construction. She said the Engineering department will never make major changes
without first approaching the Commission.
Motion and Vote
Mr. Gerber made a motion to approve this Administrative Request to modify Zoning Code
Sections 153.053 (G). The motion was seconded by Mr. Zimmerman. The vote was as follows:
Mr. Walter, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr.
Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 6 — 0.)
1
TY OF DUBLIN-
rd Use -d
g R-r PI-eig
X Shier -Rings Road
", Ohio 43016-1136
at 614-4 0-4600
614 - 4104147
i W wwwAMn.oh.es
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 15, 2007
SECTION I - CASE INFORMATION
6. Planned Unit Development Administrative Approvals Administrative Request
07- 118ADM Zoning Code Amendment
PLANNING REPORT
Proposal: Amendment to the City of Dublin Zoning Code, Chapter
153, § 153.053, Procedures
Request: Review and recommendation for approval to City Council
for amended language for Code Section 153.053.
Applicant: City of Dublin.
Planning Contact: Steve Langworthy, Director.
Contact Information: (614) 410 -4653; slangworthy @dublin.oh.us
Case Summary
This application will amend the procedures and requirements for approval of modifications to
final development plans for Planned Unit Developments. The amendment provides for
clarification of language describing those modifications that are deemed minor.
SECTION II - REVIEW STANDARDS
Case Procedure
The current Code Section 153.053(G) permits the Director of Land Use & Long Range Planning
to review "minor design modifications that are required to correct any undetected errors or that
are consistent with the purpose of the approved final development plan." The Commission
should review the modifications, provide input where necessary, and vote on the changes. The
draft amendments will then be forwarded to City Council for final review and approval.
Analysis
Currently, the Code imposes tight limits on modifications that may be administratively approved.
This has resulted, at times, in very minor changes being forced to go through the complete
amended final development plan process, causing unnecessary delays, as well as encumbering
the time of the Planning and Zoning Commission, applicants and the public. While it is
necessary to ensure that changes that have significant effect on a development continue to be
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 15, 2007 — Planning Report
Case No. 07- 118ADM — Page 2 of 2
reviewed by the Commission, the limitations of the current language do not permit sufficient
latitude for minor changes.
An addition to the current language permits the Director to bring forward even minor changes if
they are deemed sufficiently important to warrant a review by the Commission.
The proposed changes would continue to prohibit any changes to the actual development text;
where specific requirements are listed and changes are desired, a rezoning will still be necessary.
Further, Land Use & Long Range Planning is required to report administrative approvals so the
Commission can evaluate their nature and further refine the language if needed.
SECTION III - RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation for Approval to City Council.
In Planning's opinion, this amendment helps clarify administrative approvals, improves service
to property owners, and provides adequate protection for those changes deemed either minor or
warranting further review. Recommendation to City Council for approval is requested.
PROPOSED CODE SECTION
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
§ 153.053 PROCEDURES
(G) Modifications to approved final development plans. Requested modifications to
approved final development plans shall be reviewed according to the following:
(1) Administrative approval. The Director, in administering the approved final
development plan and development text, may authorize minor plan modifications
to building layouts, parking arrangements, sign locations, lighting, and other site -
related improvements that are required to correct any undetected errors or address
changes to the site made necessary during construction, provided the
modifications remain consistent with the purpose of the approved final
development plan.
(a) No modifications shall be made that increases the permitted density of
development or add to the list of permitted or conditional uses.
(b) Modifications deemed minor shall include such changes as:
Minor adjustments in lot lines provided no additional lots are
created and required setbacks are maintained;
2. Minor adjustments in the location of and layout of parking lots
provided the perimeter setbacks, yards and buffers are maintained;
Minor adjustments in building footprints up to 10% in total floor
area of the originally approved building, building height(s) or floor
plans, that do not alter the character or intensity of the use;
4. Substitution of landscaping materials specified in the landscape
plan with comparable materials of an equal or greater size;
Redesigning and /or relocating stormwater management facilities;
6. Redesigning and /or relocating landscape mounds;
Minor modifications to the sign face, landscaping and lighting,
provided the other sign requirements of the final development plan
are maintained;
Minor changes in building material or colors that are similar to and
have the same general appearance comparable to or of a higher
quality as the material approved on the final development plan.
9. Changes required by outside agencies such as the County, State, or
Federal departments.
Page 1 of 2
PROPOSED CODE SECTION
10. Other minor modifications deemed by the Director that do not alter
the basic design or any specific conditions imposed as part of the
original approval.
(c) The Director shall report approved modifications to the Planning and
Zoning Commission. The Director may submit any modification to the
Planning and Zoning Commission that would otherwise be considered
minor if the Director finds that the overall extent and effect of the
proposed modification should be reviewed by the Commission.
(2) Board of Zoning Appeals Variances.
(a) Any request for a variance to the development text pertaining to an
individual single - family dwelling shall be reviewed according to the
procedures set forth in § 153.231.
(b) Requests for establishing a model home within the Planned Development
District shall be reviewed according to the requirements of § 153.098.
(3) Planning and Zoning Commission approval.
(a) Modifications other than those listed in division (G)(1) and (2) above not
determined by the Director to be minor shall be submitted to the Planning
and Zoning Commission. Modifications may be approved provided the
Commission finds that the requested changes are compatible with the
surrounding development and that the modifications remain consistent
with the preliminary development plan.
(b) Any requested changes shall be indicated on an amended final
development plan. An application for an amended final development plan
shall follow the review procedures for final development plan review set
forth in division (E) of this section. If approved, those amendments to the
final development plan shall supersede the originally approved final
development plan.
Page 2 of 2
EXISTING CODE SECTION
§ 153.053 Dublin - Land Usage
mooning compiian and building it process, co intent with appr at as granted, ' eluding any
conditions and odifications ma by the I annin d Zoning Co 'ssion.
(1 After approval f the final level meet plan, the _pplicant shall o in a certificate
zoning pliance and bu' ing permit prior o construction.
(2) A certifi to of zoning c fiance and bu' ding permit sh not be issued tiJ the
ap opriate final pla as been record and the city h ccepted any ap cable land areas at are to
dedicated to th city.
(3) 1 construction development u er any building rmit shall be ccordance with
the approv final developm t plan, except y be permitt in division (G} this section. A
unauthor' d departure fr such plan sh be cause for vocation of the ertificate of zo - ng
compli ce. All required versants, ease nts and restiricti shall be recor prior to the ap oval
of an construction pe it in a location ere such coven ts, easements, restrictions are - tended
to ply. The city require a copy o e recorded doc ent prior to iss - g any construct' n permit.
(G) Modifications to approved final development plans. Requested modifications to approved final
development plans shall be reviewed according to the following:
(1) Administrative approval. The Director of Planning, in administering the approved final
levelopment plan, may authorize minor design modifications that are required.to correct any undetected
errors or that are consistent with the purpose of the approved final development plan.
(a) Such modifications shall not allow increases in intensity of development or additions
to the list of permitted or conditional uses.
(b) Such modifications shall be limited to:
1. Minor adjustments in lot fines provided no additional lots are created;
2. Minor adjustments in location of building footprints and parking lots provided the
perimeter setbacks, yards and buffers remain in compliance;
3. Minor adjustments in building height(s);
4. Substitution of landscaping materials;
5. Redesigning and/or relocating stormwater management facilities;
6. Redesigning and/or relocating mounds;
192
2004S-15
Zoning Regulations § 153.054
7. Minor modifications to the design of signs, including the sign face, and sign
lighting, provided the color palette, maximum sign area and maximum sign height, approved in the final
development plan, are not exceeded;
8. Minor changes in building material that are similar to and have the same general
appearance as the material approved on the final development plan.
(c) The Director of Planning shall report any approved modification to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
(2) Board of Zoning Appeals approval.
(a) Any request for a variation to the development standards text that pertains to an
individual single- family dwelling shall be reviewed as a variance according to the procedures set forth
in § 153.237.
(b) Requests for establishing a model home within the Planned Development District shall
be reviewed according to the requirements of § 153.098.
(3) Planning and Zoning Commission approval.
(a) Modifications other than those listed in division (G)(1) and (2) above shall be submitted
to the Planning and Zoning Commission. If they determine the modifications are compatible with the
surrounding development and that they are not requirements that are necessary to ensure consistency with
the preliminary development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve such change.
(b) Any such changes shall be indicated on an amended final development plan. An
application for an amended final development plan shall follow the review procedures for final
development plan review set forth in division (E) of this section. If approved, such amendments to the
final development plan shall supersede the originally approved final development plan.
(Ord- 75 -03, passed 5 -3-04)
§ 153.054
(A) Corr nts of concept pl i application. It ' the intent of thes regulations that PC concept plan
shall gene ly indicate ove 1 design of the roposed project Information sub itted should be
compre nsive enough to able the staff to derst g site and con t and the exZermined for the proposed
level ment. The applic t shall submit a mber of copies by the irector of Planning.
Th nformation sub ed should includ the following:
(1) Competed application j6rm along with thylapplication fee.
193
2004S-15