91-07 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc Form No 30043
1
1
Ordinance No. 91 -07 Passed 20
AN ORDINANCE REZONING FOUR PARCELS
TOTALLING APPROXIMATELY 7.52 ACRES,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POST ROAD,
FROM: R -1, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT (5800 -5904 POST ROAD — CASE NO. 07- 094Z).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (parcel numbers) 273000364,
27300791, 27300790, and 273000789, (see attached map marked Exhibit "A ") situated
in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in
Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin
Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B ", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C ", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the
earliest period allowed by law.
Passed thi day of :27 L) () Q {n 1 , 7 eJ.- , 2007.
Mayor - Presiding Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Land Use and Long Range Planning
CrrY OF DUBLIN_
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090
Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614- 410 -4490
TO: Members of Dublin City Council
Memo
FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager
DATE: November 1, 2007
INITIATED BY: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning
RE: Ordinance 91 -07 — 5800 -5904 Post Road (Nyrop Property)
Summary:
Ordinance 91 -07 is a request for rezoning of four parcels from R -1, Restricted Suburban
Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Coffman Park plan). The site
consists of four parcels totaling 7.52 acres, owned by the City and purchased between 2001 and
2004 to be incorporated into Coffman Park. The properties were part of the Area Rezoning
process in 2003 to establish Dublin zoning (see Case Number 03 -073Z and Ordinance Number
84 -03). The easternmost parcel contains a home with a unique architectural character and the
City intends to utilize this building as a park facility, which is not permitted in the existing
zoning. A barn associated with the remaining building is already located within the Coffman
Park PUD as a park facility. The Coffman Park PUD was established in 1994 and includes a
variety of City facilities and parkland.
The application was presented and approval was recommended by the Planning and Zoning
Commission on October 11, 2007.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends Council approve the rezoning at the second reading/public hearing of
Ordinance 91 -07 on November 19, 2007.
N
City of Dublin 07 -094Z
70 Land Use and Rezoning
Long Range Planning 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road 0 400 800
Feet
CITY OF DUBLIN.
January 2007
EXHIBIT "B"
REZONING APPLICATION
(Code Section 153.234)
TO EXPIRE
ORDINANCE NUMBER
land Us. and
5 ' - io
Lon
Range Long Renano
S hier Pl Road d
CITY COUNCIL (FIRST READING)
Dublin, oni° 43016 -?236
CITY COUNCIL (PUBLIC HEARING)
an ° °ei FaX:614410.44747
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Web Site'..dublin, ono,
Existing Land Use /Development:
NOTE: All applications are reviewed by Land Use and Long Range Planning for completeness prior to being processed.
Applications that are incomplete will not be accepted. Applicants are encouraged to contact Land Use and Long Range
Planning for assistance and to discuss the rezoning process, and if needed, to make an appointment for a pre - submittal
review prior to submitting a formal application.
1. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION:
® Preliminary Development Plan (Section 153.053)
❑ Other (Please Describe)
II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed
Property Address: G (��,, �, J
5 ' - io
poet
ig C,4
Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): L) 7C1 I
— 7 �-L l
Parcel Size (Acres):
Existing Land Use /Development:
Proposed Land Use /Development:
(V _IaV\
1"
Existing Zoning District: _
Requested Zoning District:
Pup
Total Acres to be Rezoned: —� ��
III. REZONING STATEMENT: Please attach separate sheets (8.5 X 11) to the back of this application with your responses to the
following sections.
A. Please briefly explain the proposed rezoning and development: I b' ?Vi IYl 6' '1 O VY'Z C VV
hln¢ ln4lrr4 I'�eV +] J, P,9 'tv (2e V�jikln rL"a 'j'< l s}1 r - c� �Cr�0A et, Vt Pa Vx—
PL(D.
B. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the
vicinity: X [UGC V4, -
G� v«\ k", Cvk C VV (TI- iv�.�/
0 0 VI-V (VI J
C. Briefly state how the proposed rezoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan and, if applicable, how the proposed
rezoning meets the criteria for Planned Districts [Section 153.052(B)]:
o.0 1 O1L - k C OV1n A; 'e4 vv V L'I
D. Briefly address how the proposed rezoning and development meet the review criteria for Preliminary Development Plan approval by
the Planning and Zoning Commission as stated in [Section 153.055(A)] (SEE ATTACHMENT A):
L v � iv.-�e S V'f L L l) VUL. s�� 1�1 ("t w ( oUU a'_
Page 1 of 5
Has a previous applica to rezone the property been denied by City Council within the last twelve months? ❑ Yes
If yes, list when and state the basis for reconsideration as noted by Section 153.234(A)(3):
IV. PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR INITIAL STAFF REVIEW: Please submit large (24X36) and small (11X17) sets of
plans. Please make sure all plans are stapled and collated. Large plans should also be folded. Staff may later request plans that incorporate review
comments. Fourteen (14) additional copies of revised submittals are required for the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing.
TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS AND THIRTEEN It 3) COPIES Please notarize agent authorization, if
necessary.
❑ FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
❑ FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A TAX PARCEL ID MAP indicating property owners and parcel numbers for all parcels within 500 FEET of
the site (Maximum Size 11X17). Please contact Land Use and Long Range Planning if you need assistance.
❑ FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LIST OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET of the perimeter of the property
based on the County Auditor's current tax list, including parcel number, owner name (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service), and address
(Maximum Size 11X17). It is the policy of the City of Dublin to notify surrounding property owners of pending applications under public
review. Please contact Land Use and Long Range Planning if you need assistance.
❑ .FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF THE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT
❑ FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF SCALED SITEISTAKING PLANS SHOWING:
a. North arrow and bar scale.
b. Location, size and dimensions of all existing and proposed conditions and structures (significant natural features, landscaping,
structures, additions, decks, access ways, parking).
C. Proposed Uses (Regional transportation system, densities, number of dwellings, building /unit types, square footages, parking,
open space, etc.).
d. Size of the site in acres /square feet.
e. All property lines, setbacks, street centerlines, rights -of -way, easements, and other information related to the site.
f. Existing and proposed zoning district boundaries.
q. Use of land and location of structures on adjacent properties.
❑ IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING SCALED
PLANS:
a. Grading Plan.
b. Landscaping Plan.
c. Lighting Plan
d. Utility and /or Stormwater Plan.
e. Tree Survey, Tree Preservation and Tree Replacement Plans
❑ IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) SCALED, ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
with proposed colors and materials noted.
❑ IF APPLICABLE, FOURTEEN (14) SMALL (11X17) and FOURTEEN (14) LARGE (24X36) COPIES OF SCALED DRAWINGS
SHOWING:
a. Location of signs and sign type (wall, ground, projecting, or window).
b. Sign dimensions, including letter sizes and proposed distance from sign to grade.
c. Copy layout and lettering styles (fonts) of signage.
d. Materials and manufacturer to be used in fabrication.
e. Total area of sign face (including frame)
I. Type of illumination
❑ MATERIALICOLOR SAMPLES (swatches, photos, plans, or product specifications). Include manufacturer name and product number.
Page 2 of 6
V CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): This section must be completed. Please attach additional sheets if needed.
Name (Individual or Organization): _
V.� 0 / 0 � 6cv � 12CrG �� �CNYI
Mailing Address: p�
(Street, City, State, Zip Code) �2 0 l0 --'VL /rj.��\ E��L v V ,.� - w� ( b JlpLtiv\ I 'A 50\:7
Daytime Telephone: y lL) _ `l f ., U V
Fax:
Email or Alternate Contact Information:
VI. APPLICANT: Please complete if applicable. This is the person(s) who is requesting the rezoning if different than the property
61
RLLVNPYY
owner(s).
Name:
Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.):
Mailing Address:
(Street, City, State, Zip Code)
Daytime Telephone: Fax:
Email or Alternate Contact Information:
VII. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF OWNER/APPLICANT.. Please complete if applicable. This is the primary contact person who will
rereive correspondence reaardina this application. If needed, attach additional sheets for multiple representatives.
Name: V1 Lt 2
�C��L tV13
Organization:
Mailing Address:
(Street, City, State, Zip Code)
p j� ( 0-30 I
6 �UV I�Q/1� (� -'1"� D u- ` h y/
Daytime Telephone: Lt I L
_ ( A U 00
Fax: LI I L, _ q y-y , 1
Email or Alternate Contact Information: � A-C Vii �,, vin '�! , `u.
l �
Page 3 of 5
VIII. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT /REPRESENTATIVES): If the applicant is not the property owner, this
c—tinn .,,nct r emm.inted and nntarized.
)tip, Qj rzt,l,L-6 /,c t;Z,yy� r �n (l�� Qv'ti. �,r'iy� , the owner, hereby authorize
I . C/
in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application,
representations and agreements made by the designated representative.
Signature of Current Property Owner.��_5 , 640 n . i I Date: O MZ -'7
Subscribed / /
and ] �sw ) orn to before me this � day of4 � 11 20
Oh J
State of ��1 ,,r��PPiAi,...s�t ��r�f� t' IiIC_ �. �c 4
County of rGe�l K.I1 /1 f, _ _�Iblic
Notary Public - State of Ohio
V My Commission Expires May 19, 2009
IX. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT T46 ERTY: Site visits to the property by City representatives are essential to process this
application. The Owner /Applicant, as notarized below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the
property described in this application.
X. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The City of The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin
Planning and Zoning Commission and /or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of
Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant.
XI. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized.
T L Yy44 , the owner or authorized representative, have
read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained In this application, attached exhibits and other
information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature of applicant or authorized representative: -�� C—(� I Date:
Subscribed Ia,,nd sworn to before me this
State of Or t) 6
County of Fy(" `Lit rI
L of .�Prr7- ,20 •uo
Notary Public *�
JENNIFER K. BROCK
Notary Public, State of Ohio
My Commission Expires 0506.2011
NOTE: THE OWNER, OR NOTED REPRESENTATIVE IF APPLICABLE, WILL RECEIVE A FACSIMILE CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF THIS APPLICATION
FOR OFFICE USE O
Amount Received: //J
Application No:
PSZ Date(s):
PBZAction:
Receipt No: I
(
MIS Fee No:
Date Received: 111,
Received By: '
elf
Type of Request: Q nom/ tt IA i
VV Y��
N, S, E, W (Circle) Side of:
co
S�
Nearest Intersection: D /t
p / �aV KfAI�
l• �l
Distance from Nearest Intersection:
f"1
to act as my applicant/representative(s)
modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all
Page 4 of 5
ATTACHMENT A: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA
§153.065 PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA.
(A) Preliminary development plan. In the review of proposed planned developments, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City
Council shall determine whether or not the preliminary development plan complies with the following criteria. In the event the Planning
and Zoning Commission determines that the proposed preliminary development plan does not comply with a preponderance of these
criteria, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall disapprove the application:
(1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, Intent and applicable standards of the Zoning Code;
(2) The proposed development is in conformity with Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan, and other adopted plans or
portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network;
(3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the city and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and
orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas;
(4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the city so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will
be safeguarded;
(5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan;
(6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the
site;
(7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided;
(6) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the sur-
rounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that
the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedes-
trians;
(9) The relationship.of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration
of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community;
(10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design
and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall accept-
ability of the development plans contribute to the orderly development of land within the city;
(11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and
normal swales, water courses and drainage areas;
(12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard devel-
opment regulations included in the Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent
of the Planned Development District regulations;
(13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable
appearance standards of the city;
(14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated
among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development;
(15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing
public service system for the area;
(16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service
the new development.
Page 5 of 5
�I������) �1C ✓�2�Z�lilht(�.
VILLAGE AT COFFMAN PARK
0 *UNASSIGNED
273000180 LLC
6000 KENZIE. LN
THOMAS DOROTHY L TR Ef
6631 Cornmerce parkway
273000287 AL
5503 PERIMETER DR
273000323 VILLAGE OF DUBLIN
5614 POST KID
273000364 CITY OF DUBLIN
5800 POST RD
273000789 CITY OF DUBLIN
5904 POST RD
273000790 CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO
273000791 CITY OF DUBLIN
COVINGTON DANIEL R
273002671 COVINGTON HEATHER 1.
5886 POST RD
5868 POST RD
5717 TARA IhIILL DR
273002672 BUCHAN THOMAS I' & RITA L 5729 TARA HILL DR
273002702 CITY OF DUBLIN
0 *UNASSIGNED
273003965 JENTGEN -KLEIN COMPANY
6631 Commerce parkway
273003967 JENTGEN KLEIN COMPANY
6631 Cornmerce parkway
273003968 JENTGEN -KLEIN COMPANY
6631 Commerce parkway
273004085 KLEIN PETER M 6751 COMMERCE PKY
273006685 CITY OF DUBLIN 5952 POST RD
Joseph W. Testa, Franklin County Auditor
Joseph W. Testa
Geographic Information System
V
,_' .Auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
PID: 273- 000364
City Of Dublin
5800 Post Rd, Dublin, OH 43017 -1216 linage Date: Thu Oct 4 16:06:38 2007
Site Address 5800 POST RD
Mail Address DUBLIN CITY OF
5200 EMERALD PKWY
DUBLIN OH 43017 -1066
Tax District CITY OF DUBLIN -WASH TWP- DUBLIN CSD
Description 5820 POST RD
ENTRY 2542
3.563 ACRES
Auditor's Appraised Values
Auditor's Map
01086 001.00
Neighborhood
1.00
School Name
Dublin CSD
Annual Taxes
$0.00
Land $0 Exempt Land $143,500
Building $0 Exempt Building $126,500
Total $0 Exempt Total $270,000
Building Information
Rooms 0 Baths 0
Bedrooms 0 Half Baths 0
Assessed Acreage
Landuse
CAUV
Homestead
Property Class
Number of Cards
Square Feet 0.0
Air Cond.
Page I of I
3.56
640 - Owned By Municipality
$0
Exempt
1
Fireplaces
Stories 0.0
Disclaimer This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other
public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for
verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for
the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIs Division of any discrepancies.
http: //20951.193.90/ scripts /mw5dprt.pl ?pnvTie= 7080077 &ts= Thu,Oct_ 4 16:06:382007 10/4/2007
Owner Name CITY OF DUBLIN Transfer Date 07/23/2003
Sale Amount $0
Year Built 1960
Joseph W. Testa, Franklin County Auditor
Joseph W. Testa Geographic Information System
J - auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
PID: 273- 000791
City Of Dublin
5868 Post Rd, Dublin, OH 43017 -1216 Image Date: Thu Oct 4 16:06:17 2007
0
G
Q
U
Transfer Date OS /08/2001
Sale Amount $0
Year Built Not Available
Page I of 1
Site Address 5868 POST RD
Mail Address DUBLIN CITY OF Auditor's Map N090AA 004.00
Neighborhood 1.00
5200 EMERALD PKWY School Name Dublin CSD
DUBLIN OH 43017 -1066 Annual Taxes $0.00
Tax District CRY OF DUBLIN -WASH TWP- DUBLIN CSD
Description 5868 POST ROAD
JOHNSTON SUBDIVISION
LOT 3
Auditor's Appraised Values Assessed Acreage 1.32
Land $0 Exempt Land $61,900 Landuse 660 - Owned By Park District
Building $0 Exempt Building $0 CAUV $0
Total $0 Exempt Total $61,900 Homestead
Property Class Exempt
Building Information Number of Cards 1
Rooms 0 Baths 0 Square Feet 0.0 Fireplaces
Bedrooms 0 Half Baths 0 Air Cond. Stories 0.0
Disclaimer This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other
public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for
verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for
the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIs Division of any discrepancies.
littp:H209.51.193.90/ scripts /mw5dprt.pl ?ptlame- 7284239 &ts 'I'Iiu_Oct 4_ 16:06:17 2007 10/4/2007
Joseph W. Testa, Franklin County Auditor
Joseph W. Testa Geographic Information System
Auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
PID: 273- 000790
City Of Dublin Ohio
5886 Post Rd, Dublin, OH 43017 -1216 Image Date: Thu Oct 4 16:05:56 2007
_ � I
Owner Name
Site Address
Mail Address
NZ
,.
CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO Transfer Date 04/16/2004
Sale Amount $0
Year Built 89
5886 POST RD
DUBLIN CITY OF Auditor's Map N090AA 003.00
Neighborhood 1.00
5200 EMERALD PKWY School Name Dublin CSD
DUBLIN OH 43017 -1066 Annual Taxes $0.00
Page I of 1
Tax District CITY OF DUBLIN -WASH TWP -DUBLIN CSD
Description 5886 POST RD
JOHNSTON SUBDIVISION
LOT 2
Auditor's Appraised Values Assessed Acreage 1.26
Land $0 Exempt Land $125,100 Landuse 660 - Owned By Park District
Building $0 Exempt Building $0 CAUV $0
Total $0 Exempt Total $125,100 Homestead
Property Class Exempt
Building Information Number of Cards i
Rooms 0 Baths 0 Square Feet 0.0 Fireplaces
Bedrooms 0 Half Baths 0 Air Cond. Stories 0.0
Disclaimer This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other
public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for
verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for
the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies.
http: //209- 51.193.90/ scripts /mw5dprt.pl ?pname- 8953551 &ts=Thu_Oct 4 16:05:56 2007 10/4/2007
G r !
NZ
,.
CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO Transfer Date 04/16/2004
Sale Amount $0
Year Built 89
5886 POST RD
DUBLIN CITY OF Auditor's Map N090AA 003.00
Neighborhood 1.00
5200 EMERALD PKWY School Name Dublin CSD
DUBLIN OH 43017 -1066 Annual Taxes $0.00
Page I of 1
Tax District CITY OF DUBLIN -WASH TWP -DUBLIN CSD
Description 5886 POST RD
JOHNSTON SUBDIVISION
LOT 2
Auditor's Appraised Values Assessed Acreage 1.26
Land $0 Exempt Land $125,100 Landuse 660 - Owned By Park District
Building $0 Exempt Building $0 CAUV $0
Total $0 Exempt Total $125,100 Homestead
Property Class Exempt
Building Information Number of Cards i
Rooms 0 Baths 0 Square Feet 0.0 Fireplaces
Bedrooms 0 Half Baths 0 Air Cond. Stories 0.0
Disclaimer This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other
public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for
verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for
the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies.
http: //209- 51.193.90/ scripts /mw5dprt.pl ?pname- 8953551 &ts=Thu_Oct 4 16:05:56 2007 10/4/2007
Joseph W. Testa, Franklin County Auditor
Joseph W. Testa Geographic Information System
3 ' Auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
P
PID: 273- 000789
City Of Dublin
5904 Post Rd, Dublin, OH 43017 -1218 Image Date: Thu Oct 4 15:55:05 2007
N
o � I
pro
Owner Name CITY OF DUBLIN Transfer Date 05/08/2001
Sale Amount $0
Year Built Not Available
Site Address 5904 POST RD
Mail Address DUBLIN CITY OF
Auditor's Map
5200 EMERALD PKWY
Neighborhood
DUBLIN On 430171066
Tax District
CITY OF DUBLIN -WASH TWP- DUBLIN CSD
Description
5904 POST RD
70HNSPON SUBDIVISION
LOT 1
Auditor's Appraised
Values
Land
$0 Exempt Land $61,900
Building
$0 Exempt Building $0
Total
$0 Exempt Total $61,900
Building Information
Rooms
0 Baths 0
Bedrooms
0 Half Baths 0
Auditor's Map
N090AA 002.00
Neighborhood
1.00
School Name
Dublin CSD
Annual Taxes
$0.00
Assessed Acreage
Landuse
CAUV
Homestead
Property Class
Number of Cards
Square Feet 0.0
Air Cond.
Page 1 of 1
1 -32
660 - Owned By Park District
$0
Exempt
1
Fireplaces
Stories 0.0
Disclaimer This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other
public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for
verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for
the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIs Division of any discrepancies.
http://209- 51.19390/ scripts /nlw5(iprt.pl ?ptiame= 5628661 &ts =Thu Oct 4 15:55:05 2007 10/4/2007
PROPOSED TEXT ADDITION
Nyrop Property Element
The site includes 7.52 acres including the Nyrop house located at 5800 Post Road that is
approximately 2,700 square feet including the lower level. The house was previously
used a residential house and is intended to be used as a multi -use city facility for the
public and city staff. The site is natural and the architecture blends well with the
environment and any future changes should be sensitive to this context.
Permitted Uses:
All non - intense uses associated with a park facility such as education, civic activities,
meeting space, and recreation activities, etc.
Development and Design Standards:
1. Any architectural changes should maintain the mid - century style and utilize
similar materials such as stone and wood.
2. Parking must meet Code. Any parking along Post Road should be kept to a
minimum and designed to minimize the impact on the scenic character of Post
Road. Shared parking with the Recreation Center is encouraged to minimize the
impact of parking along Post Road. Pedestrian access should be provided from all
parking facilities to the Nyrop house.
3. All mechanicals must be screened per Code. All landscaping should be sensitive
to the context along the North Fork Indian Run and blend with the surroundings.
4. Lighting must be residential in character and be sensitive to the park setting and
surrounding area.
5. All waste and storage must be enclosed and screened appropriately for the site.
All materials must be compatible with the building.
07 -0941,
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
COFFMAN
PAT
MAS`T'ER
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Prc[we,. For:
Cl I Y OF DUBLIN
Parks and Recreation Department
6665 Coffman Road
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Pmparcd Rp:
NlYfTS SOMIALENBERGER
Landscape Architects and land Planners
523 North Park Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Coffman Park Master Plan
Purpose
The purpose of this Master Plan is to insure that the existing and future
municipal facilities and open space in Coffman Park are integrated into 0.2
surrounding planned development neighborhoods. Since there is no specific
zoning district that is directly applicable to municipal facilities, parks and
open space, the City has applied to rezone the existing and future facilities to
P.U.D., Planned Unit Development District. In addition to furnishing the
infcrmatiou required by Chapter 1181.09, the City will develop a plan for
Coffman Park that will provide the entire City with needed park recreational
Opportunities, plan, some expansion of the existing municipal building,
maiAnin the historic setting of Coffman Ifistorical Homestead, and enhance
the new athletic open space features already present within Coffman Park.
All of this must be accomplished within the context of the existing and future
land uses surrounding the site. Particular attention must be paid to
establishing a compatible relationship between the residential neighborhoods
and the more active uses of the park.
Coffman Park is strategically located as it buffers the residences to the north
from the future industrial or conuner6al property south of Post Road. In
addition, Coffman Park is located at the apex of two important historical
roadways. As a high volume of traffic the park on a daily basis, the
park and the new facilities provide the City with an opportunity to establish a
community landmark that will serve as the activity center of the City.
Consistent with the provisions of the Planned Unit Development District
standards, this Master ['Ian will identify the range of permitted uses that may
be established in the park and establish the proper relationship between
buildings and the land area. The Plan will also provide development
standards that will permit the park to be developed in an orderly, coordinated
and comprehensive manner. Pinaliy, the ['Ian will establish the supporting
landscape and buffer standards that will enhance the natural quality and
beauty of the land as well as provide amenity and privacy between uses.
Regional and Neighborhood Context
Coffman Park is located at the entry to the largest and most developed
residential area of the City. State Route 161 from VAW Road to Coffman Road
is a vary heavily traveled route in and out of the northwest area of Dublin.
The City's Thoroughfare Plan attempts to relieve the high; traffic volumes at
the intersection of Post and Coffman Roads by extending Coffman south of
Post Road and over US 33 and down to the 1 -270 interchange at Tuttle Road.
Perimeter Drive is planned to be extended east to Coffman Road_ This will
create a new east west arterial road between Coffman Road and Avery Road.
The plan also indicates the desirability of a new road between Coffman Road
and Dublin Road. All of these road plans are likely to increase the vehicular
accessibility of Coffman Park, thus making it much more the center of the
community. 'rile extension and widening of these roads will have a visual
impact on the existing area as it will diminish some of the rural q_-ality that is
presently enjoyed.
Post Road has served as the dividing line between industrial and commercial
land associated with US 33 on the south and residential prop -arty on the
north. The Dublin Community Plan indicates that nearly two - thirds of
Dublin's projected residential population will lie north of Post Road and west
of the Scioto River. Dublin I ligh School is located just north of Coffman Park
at Coffman and Tara [fill Roads. The Dublin Justice Center is located just to
,tile solf.h oil Perimeter Drive. r
The development picture adjacent to Coffman Park is not yet complete . The
land along the park is lined with residences on the north and cast sides. The
iand on the west and south side of the park is still rural. 'rile property
adjacent to the park on the west is zoned R -1 and contains a residence and
small horse farm. 'rile land to the south is still being farmed but is zoned 1. 1,
Limited Industrial. It is unknown at this point how the land south of Post
Road will be developed in the future. When this property is developed
Coffman Park lose its rural context.
Site Analysis
The Coffman Park Plan incorporates approximately 43 +/- acres of land located
on the west side of Coffman Road and the north side of Post Road. 'rile City
has been progressively acquiring property at this location since the mid 1970's.
Approximately 14 acres of the site has been improved with the Dublin
Municipal Building (approximately 11,000 sq. ft.), a metal maintenance
building (5,000 sq. ft.) and a small maintenance yard . The park portion of the
site includes boih passive and active recreation. The site includes a basketball
n I three te_ :ois courts, a playground and picnic shelters and restrooar. The
passive open space area is attractively landscaped around Cie South For:: of
Indian Run Stream. 'rile stream is the key natural feature of the site. The
remaining site features consist of the Indian Run flood plain and farm fields.
The land gently slopes south toward the stream. North of the stream flood
p?ain the land is sufficiently flat to be of no couse< uecce in the development
of athletic fields, driveways or buildings. The size of the floodway makes
development on the south side of the stream extremely remote from the rest
of the p,�:k.
1.
A tree survey has identified a number of tree masses and landmark trees on
the site. Most of the trees are within close proximity to the stream. Other
landmark trees are within a fence row that existed between two fields in the
middle of the site.
A soil survey conducted has determined that the subsurface conditions of the
site appear to be favorable for the construction of the proposed park and
community center. Most of the soil deficiencies can be handled with standard
building techniques. Borings in the area of a proposed pond encountered
bedrock at an 8' depth_ The report indicated that there is a remote possibility
that the borings encountered a pinnacle rock formation. More investigation
may have to performed in this area if the area is to be developed as a pond.
The soils analysis also indicated that a very fine to coarse gravel and sand type
soil was discovered in the area of the proposed pond. If this is the base, the
future pond will need to be designed so that the bottom of the pond can be
lined with an impervious clay. The subsurface investigation also indicated
that large amounts of ground water will be encountered at about 8' below
grade. The construction of the building will require the use of sump pumps
or other cle- watering techniques depending on the amounts of ground water
encountered. The completed building will most likely require sump pumps
and foundation drains.
Coffman Park is currently served by both sanitary and water utility lines.
Water lines exist along Coffman Road, Tara Hilt Road and Post Road, and
may be looped through the site in nearly any manner that provides service
where it is needed but disturbs the least amount of park area. The site is also
served by a large 21" sanitary sewer that exists between the stream and Post
Road. The existing facilities are presently connected to that sanitary line.
A storm sewer line that serves Shannon Park Subdivision crosses the park
approximately in the middle of the L- shaped area. The line was extended
from Shannon Park to where it discharges into the stream.
Summary of Site Conditions
1. Development must observe applicable flood plan regulations.
2. There may be areas where soils will not permit the creation of future
ponds.
3. Site planning will need to include the landmark t1 "on the site,
4. 'File existing and passive recreation space should be enhanced.
Coffman Park Elements and Objectives
The Coffman Park Master Plan was initiated due to the desire of City Officials
to include a community center within Coffman Park. The location of the
Community Center and the park master planning process that ensued was
guided by a set of development objectives and principles that were established
as part of the Dublin Community Plan. These objectives and supporting
principles included:
RECREATIONAL F C 1_I' IE
A. Objectives:
The parks system of Dublin shall be planned, located, designed
and constructed to provide:
1. Recreational opportunity for the Dublin community;
2. Each neighborhood and sub - neighborhood of the City
with parks grounds and playgrounds; and
3. Recreational facilities for use by all age groups.
B. Part; Development Principles:
1. Provide Mini -Parks for minimal recreational
opportunities in unusual circumstances where
neighborhood parks are not available.
2. Provide Neighborhood Parkt for basic recreational
opportunities which are easily accessible to local residents.
3. Provide Coin ninity Parks to concentrate a broad range
of recreational activities for major portions of the City.
4. Provide Specialty Parks for unique landmarks and
environmentally significant areas.
5. Locate parks to enhance unique landmarks and
environmentally significant areas.
air
6. Maintain cooperative provision and use of school -hark
sites and facilities to provide maximum recreational
opportunities
7
7. Carefully review park sites accepted for use by the City to
ensure suitability for the projected needs of a given area.
Such review will include review of the topography,
nature of these soils, vegetation, and surrounding land
uses.
8. Promote and encourage the dedication and development
of bicycle and pedestrian linkages between parks.
9. Develop public parks in a manner consistent with
applicable zoning development standards.
10. Enhance advantages of the Scioto River by providing
scenic overlooks and river parks while maintaining its
larkAtape feature and not disturbing the channel. _
OPEN SPACE
A. Objectives:
To provide and enhance Dublin's natural features while
allowing the environment to be shared by the community.
Q. Principles:
1. Provide an interconnected open space system t o
permanently maintain visual and functional linkages
between parks and other open spaces.
2. Promote the concept of acquiring development rights and
easements when desirable and necessary to preserve open
space, scenic views, woodlands, wetlands, and flood
plains.
3. Continue and expand maintenance planting programs for
plantings on public property which add to the attractive
character of the City.
4. Preserve natural features such as woodlands and' ravines
Through strict enforcement of well defined flood plain and
storm water management regulations.
.u,r
5. Avoid undue erosimi and sedimientation by encouraging
preventive measures during development.
8
COMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES
0
3
Objectives:
City service facilities should be provided to efficienti;• meet the
administrative, maintenance, public safety, and cultural needs of
the community. The water system should provide for the safe
and efficient delivery of water to the community, and the sewer
system should provide the safe and efficient collection and
disposal of community waste water.
Principles:
1. Locate administrative offices primarily in one municipal
area:*. - z
2. Assure that a sufficient
provide development
municipal area.
aniount of land is purchased to
and expansion of one main
3. Administer Safety Service from a central location.
4. Provide a primary focus (or community activities and
City services within a civic center.
5. Maintain a high level of gover;:ntent services
commensurate with available revenues based on sound
fiscal practice.
6. Promote city services with well designed and integrated
municipal buildings.
7. Ensure that private sector development participates in
improvements to the major sewer and water systems
through water development fees and construction of
selected facilities.
8. Protect and preserve citizens and property from damage
caused by fire, and work toward the elimination of
hazards through fire prevention activities.
9
EN VIRONMENT AND APPEAR
A. Objectives:
Dublin's small town atmosphere, scenic beauty, unique
features, local heritage, and quality development should
be protected and enhanced.
>i. Principles:
1. Maintain high standards in public and private building
design and landscape site design.
2. Promote building and site designs that are of good scale
and n harmony with permanent neighborhood buildings
and the natural surroundings.
3. Promote site planning in which setbacks and yards are in
excess of zoning restrictions to provide an interesting
relationship among buildings.
4. Maintain and enhance the visibility and character of the
Scioto River corridor, including the quality of water and
the maintenance of the natural vegetation along its banks.
5. Assure that the streants, ravines, and wooded areas are
preserved as very important environmental elements
within the community.
6. Develop an open space systent which protects
environmentally critical areas such as floodways and
drainage corridors, against encroachment; preserves
significant vistas and views; provides relief from expanses
of development and pavement; and offers opportunities
for development of systems of greenways and sites for
outdoor recreation.
7. Maintain and enhance the visibility of those elements
that build tic; intage of Dublin such as stone walls, rock
out - crops, and pastoral hews.
10.
r
10
Summary
Some of the specific plan elements that were to be included in the plan
are as follows:
?. To develop a site plan for the Community Center that will
be used. by the entire community but yet sensitive to the
neighborhood in which it will exist.
2. To create a circulation system within the park that will
provide multiple points of access to the park.
3. Identify some area of expansion for the Municipal
Ruilding.
t
4. Preserve the rural open space character of the park along
the perimeter road«ays.
5. Enhance the historical setting of the Coffman Homestead.
o. Provide open space for play and community gatherings.
7. identify areas for public art.
11
Coffman Park Master Plan Elements
In the early stages of the master planning process it was apparent that the
foremost task was to establish the exact position of the Community Center.
The Center was to be in a prominent position, although it still had to be
sensitively placed so as to not adversely impact the surrounding residential
properties. The existence of the stream and the relatively large flood plain
made this task more difficult. After the Community Center was sited, the
circulation syster., was developed to provide access to the Center and the
Park. The circulation system had to also preserve and create large open spaces
:within the park. The eri:..ng visual quality of Coffman Park along Post Rd.
and Coffman Rd. frontg , is intended to exist in the same mariner as it does
now. The Coffman h d'mestead could not be visually impacted, but needed to
be enhanced with landscaping and open space. Also, if the Municipal
Building is expanded, the front elevation must continue to maintain the
residential scale and duality that currently exists. The 48 +/- acre park was
found to be slightly too large and irregularly shaped to be designed as a
campus with shared parking facilities. Instead the active areas of the park are
located in as close proximity as possible along the park drives. This
arrangement will enable users to access centrally located parking lots and also
to permit multiple family activities to take place within short distances. By
locating the more active play areas and structures along the drive in the
interior of the site will also increase the amount of open green space within
the park.
For descriptive purposes, the Coffman Park Master Plan will be divided into
the individual elements that the Dublin City Council will adopt as the
development plan for the park and facilities.
Park Circulation System Element
Vehicular access to and within Coffman Park is dictated by the Community
Center. The Center mill have the highest average volume of vehicular traffic,
as well as the highest peak volume within the park. Given the potential
volume of traffic to the Center, it was decided that the park should have three
access points. The multiple access will serve to distribute traffic, provide
better access to the most populated areas of the City, establish the park as the
center of the community activity and will permit access through the park
from one facility to the next without using a perimeter arterial road o
The boulevard main entry at Post Road is desigred so that it first accentuates
the open space, then suddenly places entering vehicles on visual center with
the Community Center. This design quality may be strengthened by
strategically establishing the grade of the entrance drive to provide an even
La
greater visual impact on arriving at the Center. A bridge will be built at this
location in conformance with applicable floodway regulations.
The Coffman Rd. entry will be at the same location as it now exists. The drive
should siightly pull away from the residences as it passes the existing
Municipal Building parking lot. This will permit the establishment of a more
substantial landscape buffer than is now in place. When the drive is beyond
the houses it is planned to swing north so as to permit all parking lots to be
on the south side of the road. away from the residences.
The Down Patrick Dr. asess on the north has been determined to be necessary
due to the fact that many users of the park will come from the neighborhoods
= located in that area of the city. This access will serve to keep local traffic off
the perimeter roadways.
The functional areas of the park will be connected with pedestrian /bike paths.
Development and Design Standards
1. Driveway pavement widths will be 22' to 26' wide and improved with
curb and gutters.
2. Roads and bridges will be built to meet or exceed all City Engineering
Standards,
3. Pedestrian paths will be a minimum of 8' wide and be built to meet or
exceed all city engineering standards.
1 s
Historic Coffman Homestead Element
The Coffman Homestead has been leased to the Dublin Historical Society who
has taken considerable effort to preserve and restore this landmark. The
Coffman House and barn and the other accessory structures have been
restored for public viewing. It is the Historical Society's intent to gradually
restore the entire homestead in an attempt to recreate farm life in early
DL.blin. Facility development within the park must be sensitive to the plans
of the Historical Society. Future landscaping efforts .should be coordinated so
that the Homestead maintains its vintage appearance.
Permitted Uses
All uses attendant to a public restoration landmark including minor office
use by the Dublin Historical Society.
Development and Design Standards
The Historical Society must adhere to the "Standards For Rehabilitation" as
established by the Secretary of the Interior.
15
Dublin Municipal Building Element
The existing Dublin Municipal Building is approximately 11, 000 sq. ft. in size.
The building houses the administration, parks and finance departments. The
Parks Department is planned to move to Community Center. The City
Council Chambers are also located here. Since the City has recently purchased
a building in another location to house many City Departments, it is unlikely
that the existing Municipal Building will be expanded in the future. If the
building is expanded, care should be taken to maintain the residential
appearance from the Coffman Rd. frontage. A building expansion may also
use the Coffman Homestead as a focal point for a new Council Chambers.
.permitted Uses
All uses associated with municipal administrative functions as well a other
civic functions.
Development and Design Standards
1. A parking study should be performed to le 'Zermine the parking
requirements of the expanded building. Parking may be shared with
those lots developed for the park.
2. The building will continue to complement the adjacent residential
structures ?nd the Coffman Homestead. The building will maintain its
existing aesthetic quality with the continued use of compatible building
materials and common lighting, signage and landscape themes.
3. Building materials will be either wood or stone.
4. The standing seam metal roof will be utiiized on any expansion and
painted to match the existing roof.
5. No materials. supplies, equipment or products shali be perr.lanently
stored outside the permitted structure.
6. Mechanical and all other equipment on the ground shall be fully
screened from view by a wall, fence or landscape material utilizing the
same material or character of the building.
+r
7. All lighting elements shall be in conformance with City of Dublin
Lighting Guidelines.
8. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened form
view by a solid wall, mounding, piantin ; and /or fence. the height of
16
the proposed screen shall exceed the container by at least one foot. The
enclosure will completely surround the container and be constructed of
materials that are consistent with the building material and color.
S:
_,
17
s
.i.
fit.•
.�
17
Community Recreation Center Element
The Dublin community Recreation Center is to be a state -of -the- art facility
that will serve as the community's prime location for all indoor recreation
activity. The building program for the Center calls for gy nvasiums,
competitive and play pools, a jogging track, areas for senior citizen activities,
woodshop, art room and theater, classrooms, kitchen facilities and a
community hall. There will also be space for administrative offices. The first
phase of the building is expected to be approximately 74,700 sq. ft. Phase two
of the building will increase the size to approximately 117,000 sq. ft.
The interior and the exterior architectural program calls for the building to
maintain a residential appearance. the structure is to be warmly inviting both
iWide and out. As the building will house many different type of activities; *t
was extremely important to consider the adjacency requirements among the
activities. These requirements have dictated the layout of the building. The
exterior site requirements were then obviously designed to match the
interior. These features include the provision of sheltered and strategically
located drop off areas, accessible parking lots, strong relationships to the
outside activity areas and attractive views to and from the facility.
For purposes of the Master Plan, the building has b,-:en placed on the largest
expanse of land within th park. The building will be just ivith the limits of
the 100 year flood plain of the stream so that as much distance as possible is
maintained to the residences north of the building. The parking lots for the
building were placed on the west and north sides of the building in order to
create a large lawn or open space area immediately adjacent to the building.
A buffer plan has been developed to screen the parking lots and drives from
the neighboring residences. Tile structure was also p ?aced cn the west side of
the site to preserve the tree row that runs through the middle of the park
area. This will preserve the existing landmark trees.
A traffic and parking study was performed to determine access, circulation
and parking requirements for the Center.
Permitted Uses
All uses associated with a community recreation center.
Development and Design Standards
1. The building will be no closer than 175 feet to the west property line
and 380 feet to the north property line. All pavement areas will be setback a
minimum of 15 feet from the west property line and 35 feet from the north
property line.
:8
2. The height of the building shall be 50' as measured by the Dublin
Zoning Code.
3. The Community Center wili have a minimum of 350 parking spaces.
4. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from
view by a solid wall, mounding, planting and or /fence. The height of
the proposed screen shall exceed the container by at least one foot. The
enclosure will completely surround the container and be constructed of
materials that are consistent with the building materials and color.
5. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be permanently
stored outside the permitted structure.
6. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter
1187.
7. The Community Center will be designed to be compatible with the
Dublin Municipal Building and be sympathetic to the residential
character of the surrounding area. Exterior materials for the building
will include stone veneer, a synthetic plaster material with wood
accents The Center will maintain a sloped roof form similar to the
existing Municipal Building. The roof material will be standing
metal seam or copper.
8. Building, roof and trim colors will be complimentary and be selected
from an earth tone range of colors.
9. All exterior lighting will be in compliance with the Dublin Lighting
Guidelines especially as it pertains to the use of cut off fixtures to
prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties.
t 1)
Parks, Outdoor Recreation and Open Space Eleineiti
The Master Plan was prepared with the understanding that Coffman Park
must maintain the scenic and recreational open space qualities th-: the public
has enioved for years. The park has always been pleasing to those that have
used the facilities as well as to those who drive by on a daily basis. Despite the
fact that the use of the park will greatly increase over the years and that new
facilities will be added, great care must be exercised to insure that the key open
space areas are preserved and not developed in a hodge podge fashion. These
open spaces will be as integral to the function and image of the park as the
community buildings.
The park will maintain three large areas dedicated to pas':•: e open space.
• The area located at the corner of Coffman Road and Post Road. The scenic
t,
open space in this area has for many years provide an attractive green
entry into this quadrant of the City.
• The area between Indian Run Stream and Post Road should remain open
as it will buffer the park and maintain a rural character wl•.en the land on
the south side of Post Road is developed.
• The large space between the Community Center building and the
residences in Shannon Park. The area will be more formal as it will be
designed to accentuate the building and to serve specific exterior recreation
programs associated with the Center. This area will also serve as a
community gathering area for special events. A community stage may be
placed at the southern end of this open space near the stream to take
advantage of the natural contours that will provide good viewing. The
final plan may also include a pond if space ,nd subsurface conditions
permit.
The more active areas of the park will include playgrounds, basketball and
tennis courts and the community stage will be located along the east /west
drive dux;ugh the park. The plan is to preserve op-ni space, to provide easy
access for all age groups, to increase the tikelihood of shared parking and to
group activity areas so that families can monitor multiple activities.
Permitted Uses
."aygrounds, play courts, picnic areas and shelters, a community stage,
pergolas, ponds and other elements consistent with good landscape
architectural practices.
2s
Development and Design Standards
1. All parking areas will be hard surface and landscaped in accordance
with the Dublin Zoning Code.
2. Exterior lighting will be in conformance with the Dublin Lighting
Guidelines.
3. New play areas will be handicapped accessable.
X:
26
Buffer Detail Element
See the attachcdt development plans.
27
I
.I f
1 41,
p
"**use,
;"may'
Y I I PI
s
Y I I PI
Alb
7
CITY 01� DUBLIN
Land Use and
Long Range Planning
5800 Shier Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 430161236
Phone: 614 - 4104600
Fax 614 410 4747
Web Site smw.dublin.ohns
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
October 11, 2007
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
2. 5800 -- 5904 Post Road 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
07 -094'Z Rezoning
Proposal: To incorporate four parcels as part of Coffman Park for park and
recreational use, located on the north side of Post Road,
approximately 650 feet west of Coffinan Park Drive.
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning under the Planned District
provisions of Code Section 153.050.
Applicant: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, City of Dublin.
Planning Contacts: Jamie E. Adkins, AICP, Planner II and Eugenia Martin, ASLA,
Landscape Architect.
Contact Information: (614) 410 -4644, jadkins @dublin.oh.us and (614) 410 -4650,
emartin @dublin.oh.us
MOTION: To approve this Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan because it is in keeping
with previous intentions to expand Coffinan Park under the guidance of the Coffman Park
Master Plan and is compatible with the development pattern in the area.
VOTE: 6 -- 0.
RESULT: This Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan was approved.
STAFF CER'1'IFICATION
ame P dlz F
Planner 11
CYFY OF DUBLIV
tend Use and
tang Range Planning
5800 Shier Rings Read
Dublin, Ohio 430161236
Phone: 614 410 4600
Fax: 614 410 4747
Web Site :;v .dubhn.ah.us
PLANNING REPORT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 11, 2007
SECTION 1 —CASE INFORMATION:
2. 5800 — 5904 Post Road 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
07 -094Z Rezoning
Proposal: To incorporate four parcels as part of Coffman Park for park and
recreational use, located on the north side of Post Road,
approximately 650 feet west of Coffinan Park Drive.
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning under the Planned District
provisions of Code Section 153.050.
Applicant: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, City of Dublin.
Planning Contacts: Jamie E. Adkins, AICP, Planner 11 and Eugenia Martin, ASLA,
Landscape Architect.
Contact Information: (614) 410 -4644, jadkins @dublin.oh.us and (614) 410 -4650,
ernartin @dublin.oh.us
Case Summary:
This is a request for review and approval of a rezoning (preliminary development plan) of four
parcels from R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development
District for an existing 2,700 - square -foot residential structure and open space to be used as part:
amenities. The site consists of 7.52 acres located north of Post Road at the terminus of
Commerce Parkway. It is Planning's opinion that the proposed use is compatible and fits with
the character of the area and approval of this request is recommended.
Site Background and History:
The site consists of four parcels owned by the City and purchased between 200 t and 2004 to be
incorporated into Coffman Park. The properties were part of the Area Rezoning process in 2003
to establish Dublin zoning (see Case Number 03 -0732 and Ordinance Number 8403). The
easternmost parcel contains a home with a unique architectural character and the City intends to
utilize this building as a park facility which is not permitted in the existing zoning. A barn
associated with the remaining building is already located within the Coffman Park PUD as a park
facility. The Coffman Park PUD was established in 1994 (see attached case history) and
includes a variety of City facilities and parkland.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Report — October 11, 2007
Case No. 07 -094Z -- Page 2 of 5
Site Description:
Project Site
The parcels are comprised of 7.52 acres that vary in size from 1.32 acres to 156 acres and have a
cumulative frontage of 882 feet along Post Road. The site is located on the north side of Post
Road, west of the enhance to Coffman Park and the Dublin Community Recreation Center. The
western three parcels are open space and the eastern parcel contains the building, referred to as
the Nyrop house. Flood plain associated with the North Fork Indian Run intertwines through the
northern part of the parcels. There is a change in elevation of approximately eight feet from the
South to the north. 'Frees and vegetation are located throughout the site.
Surrounding Sites
The site is currently zoned R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District and adjacent property to
the north, east, and west is zoned PUD, Planted Unit Development District, as part of the
Coffman Park Planned District (PUD). To the south are office buildings and cultivated
farmland, zoned Limited Industrial District (LI).
Proposed Rezoning:
The Coffman Park development text outlines uses and development standards for the different
elements that were included in the park when the zoning was established in 1994. The list of
elements is specific to the buildings and park facilities. The subject properties will be included
as a new element in the text that allows park uses similar to those permitted in the existing park,
which and include gathering spaces, a public park facility, and passive parkland. The City may
make minor exterior changes to the site in the future and a final development plan will be
required at that time.
The Future Land Use Map of the Community Plan, amended by City Council in 2005, designates
two of the parcels as "Public Park" and the other two as "Existing Residential." The City
purchased the properties with the intention of their inclusion in Coftinan Park.
Plan Description:
Overview
This proposal is to incorporate four existing residentially zoned parcels into the Coffman Park
Planned District.
Site Layout
The existing home is located approximately 200 feet from the eastern property line and is
setback 100 feet from Post Road. A circular driveway connects from Post Road and leads to the
garage attached to the structure. The building is approximately 2,700 square feet and includes a
large patio at the rear and a path that connects to a covered bridge that crosses the North Fork
Indian Rum. An existing barn previously used as a stable is located north of the property in the
Coffman Park PUD.
Nyrop Property Element.
The existing Coffman Park Master Plan includes sections for the different park elements, similar
to subareas, that identify permitted uses and development standards. A new element is proposed
Dublin Planning and 'Zoning Commission
Planning Report— October 11, 2007
Case No. 07 -094Z — Page 3 of 5
that will address the addition of this site and the building to the overall park in the development
text. The proposed uses allow the building to be utilized as a public park facility that may
include a nature education center and meeting space. The development standards are intended to
maintain the aesthetic quality of the building and the site.
Open Space
The parcels are considered part of the larger parkland network and include both passive and
active open space and facilities.
Access
There is an existing access point to Post Road that generally aligns with Commerce Parkway to
the south. No new access to Post Road is proposed at this time Any additional development that
requests additional access points will need to be shown and approved through the Final
Development Plan process.
Sidewalks and Bikepaths
Through the continued future development of the site as a park amenity, a bike path connection
to the existing bikepath network will be required. The provisions for the bikepath connectivity
may be incorporated into the overall Post Road realignment project.
Utilities /Stormwater Management
The existing building has City utilities by means of a 16-inch water line on the north side of Post
Road and a 24 -inch sanitary sewer on the south side of Post Road. Any changes to the
impervious area on the site will require compliance with the Stormwater Management Code
through review and approval of a final development plan.
Parking
Any additional parking necessary to facilitate the use of the existing structure or parkland will
require review and approval of a final development plan and compliance with the proposed
parking standards of the text.
SECTION II - REVIEW STANDARDS:
Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan
The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site
planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning,
landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three
stages:
1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment);
2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission
recommends and City Council approves /denies); and
3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies).
The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the
general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and
Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development
plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be returned to City Council for a public
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Planning Report — October 11, 2007
Case No. 07 -0942 — Page 4 of 5
hearing and Final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative
recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days
following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final
development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction.
Evaluation and Recommendation based on Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan
Criteria
Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a
Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. These criteria arc summarized in the following
categories and may be in a different order than listed in the Code:
Adopted Policies and Plans (Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4): The proposed development is consistent
with the Dublin Zoning Code; is in conformity with the Community Plan; advances the general
welfare of the City; and the proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use
and value of property within and aalfacent to the area will be sarfeguarded.
Criteria are met: The Future Land Use Map of the Community Plan identifies the land
use for this site as "Public Park" and "Existing Residential ". The update to the
Community Plan Future Land Use Map indicates all the subject properties as "Park /Open
Space." It is Planning's opinion that the proposed use fulfills the intended fixture land use
and adds parkland and an amenity to the community.
Parks and Open Space (Criteria 5 and 6): The proposed residential development will have
sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Connnunity Plan, and the proposed
development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural
resources of the site.
Criteria are met: The site is currently utilized as parkland and will continue to be used
as such in the future. This rezoning will allow the City to expand the current uses and
create new amenities for Coffman Park.
Traffic, Utilities and &orrrrwater Management (Criteria 7, 8, and II): Adequate utilities, access
roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; and
adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding
public streets and to mcuinrize public safety and to acconunodate adequate pedestrian and bilce
circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non -
conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists acrd pedestrians; cold adequate provision is
made for stores drainage within and through the .site so as to maintain, as far as practicable,
usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas.
Criteria are inet: The site is currently served with adequate utilities, stormwater
management facilities, and vehicular and pedestrian circulation for the proposed use.
This proposal does not modify any public streets and does not include additional curb
cuts to public streets. Additional impervious area will require the entire site to be brought
into compliance with current Stormwater Management Code through review and
approval of a final development plan.
Dublin Planning and 'Zoning Commission
Planning Report — October 11, 2007
Case No. 07 -0942 — Page 5 oi' 5
Development Standards (Criteria 9, and 10): The relationship of buildings and structures
provides for the coordination and integration of this development to the community and
maintains the image of Dublin as a quality connnunity and the development standards, and the
design and layout of the open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other
elements contribute to the orderly development of land within the City.
Criteria are met: The proposal permits the inclusion of the parcels into Coffinan Park
and fulfills an elcment of the Future Land Use Map that identifies a contiguous green
space with passive elements along the north side of Post Road. The proposed addition to
the Coffman Park development text provides standards that will contribute to the orderly
development of this site, including proposed use and density.
Design Standards (12, and 1.3): The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the
proposed development justify arty deviation fi - om the standard development regulations included
in the Code or the Subdivision Regulations; cure consistent with the intent of the Planned
Development District regulations; and the proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality
of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the
city.
Criteria are met: This proposal is consistent with the intent of the Coffman Park Master
Plan and the Future Land Use Map identified in the Community Plan. The proposed
development standards will maintain the natural character of the site and continue the
passive and active use of Coff an Park.
Infrastructure (Criteria 14, 15 cord 16): The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for
the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various
phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; the proposed development can be
adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements, and the applicant's
contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are
sufficient to service the new development.
Criteria are met: The site does not require additional infrastructure and is adequately
serviced by existing public inGastruchu
SECTION III - RECOMMENDA "LION:
The Coffinan Park PUD was adopted by the City in 1994 for the distinct purpose of providing an
amenity to the residents of Dublin. This request is in keeping with previous intentions of the
City of Dublin to expand Coffman Park under the guidance of the Coffinan Park Master Plan. It
is Planning's opinion that this proposal is compatible with the development pattern in this area.
Based on the evaluation of this proposal according to the criteria set forth in Code Section
153.050, approval of this Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan is recommended.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes —October 11, 2007
DRAFT Pa 8 of 20
2. 5800 — 5904 Post Road 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
07 -094Z Rezoning
Rick Gerber noted that there were no conditions or comments to be made on this case.
Motion and Vote
Todd Zimmerman made the motion to approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
because it is in keeping with previous intentions to expand Coffman Park under the guidance of
the Coffman Park Master Plan and is compatible with the development pattern in the area. Mr.
Gerber seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Walter, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes;
Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes.
(Approved 6 — 0.)
Dublin City Council Minutes
October 20, 2003
LEGISLATION
SECOND READING /PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCES
ZONING
Ordinance 84 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 26 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 112
Acres, As Annexed from Washington'Ibwnship in 1966 and 1973, Located Generally
Along the North and South Sides of Post Road, Between Avery - Muirfield Drive and SR
161A -270, as R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District and Ll, Limited Industrial
District. (Case No. 03 -073Z - Post Road /Avery Road to I -270 Rezoning)
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms.
Chinnici- ZUBreher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
Ordinance 85 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 12 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 83
Acres, as Annexed from Washington Township in 1965, 1973, 1980 and 1988, Located
Generally on the South Side of Brand Road, East of Coffman Road and West of Dublin
Road, as R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District and R, Rural District. (Case No.
03 -072Z — Coffman Road to Dublin Road, Between Brand Road and 1 -270)
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
Ordinance 86 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 13 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 24
Acres, as Annexed from Washington Township in 1973, Located Generally on the South
Side of Brand Road, West of Coffman Road, as R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential
District. (Case No. 03 -0712 — Coffman Road /Brand Road)
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms.
Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
Ordinance 87 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 18 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 150
Acres, as Annexed fi Washington and Jerorric Townships in 1973 and 1999, Located
Generally on the North Side of Post Road, South of Brand Road, Between Hyland -Croy
and Muirfield Drive, as R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District and R, Rural
District. (Case No. 03 -070Z —Post Road to Brand Road, West of Muirfield Drive and
East of I lyland -Croy Road)
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner,
yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes.
07 -094Z,
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
CtPI OF DtTLl\.
Division of Planning
5800 Shier -Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 430161236
Phone/TDD:614- 4104600
fox 614 761 -6566
Web Sile: w .dublin.ah.us
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
SEPTEMBER 18, 2003
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
6. Area Rezoning 03 -073Z — Post Road /Avery Road to I -270
Location: 26 parcels comprising an area of approximately 112 acres, as annexed from
Washington Township in 1966 and 1973, generally along the north and south sides of
Post Road, between Avery Road and the State Route 161/1-270 ramp.
Existing Zoning: Washington Township Districts.
Request: Review and approval of an ordinance to establish Dublin R -1, Restricted
Suburban Residential and LI, Limited Industrial Districts.
Property Owners: City of Dublin, c/o Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, 5200 Emerald
Parkway; Christopher and Deborah Cline, 6060 Post Road; Edith and Bill Driscoll, 6230
Post Road; Gerald Fogle, 6336 Post Road; Albert Gagliardi and Yvonne Bucholtz, 6316
Post Road; Wynn and Judy Hollingshead, 6810 Avery Road; Gary Kimnan, 10171
Olentangy River Road, Powell, Ohio 43065; Joseph and Mary Mazza, 6344 Post Road;
Julia Phelps, 6290 Post Road; Richard and Linda Pomante, 6800 Avery Road; Albert and
Florence Schoby, 6233 Post Road; and Stephen and Cheryl Wall, 6296 Post Road; Mdt
Real Estate Mngmt Lp, 9232 Stratton Lane; Dorothy Thomas, 5494 Cara Court; Fj &S
Investments, Polis & Simon, 75 E. Wilson Bridge Road, Worthington, Ohio 43085 -2362;
Continental Real Estate Accounting Dept, 150 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215;
John Mckitrick, Vizcaya Suite IC3, 2333 Gulf of Mexico Drive, Longboat Key, Florida
34228. The above addresses are located within Dublin, Ohio unless otherwise noted.
Applicant: City of Dublin, c/o Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, 5200 Emerald
Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017.
Staff Contact: Anne Wanner, Planner.
MOTION: To approve this area rezoning because it will apply an appropriate Dublin zone, will
provide for effective development administration, will maintain the established development
pattern, and is consistent with the Community Plan.
VOTE: 7 -0.
RESULT: This area rezoning was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a
positive recommendation.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
AA u 07 -0942
Barbara M. Clarke, Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes — September 18, 2003
Page 4
Mr. Zimme made the motion to rove this rezoning a cation because it will ly an
appropri ublin zone, will prov' e for effective develo nt administration, wil aintain the
esta ed development pat and is consistent the Community 1) Mr. Messineo
est3 conded, and the vote Mr. Ritchie, yes; Gerber, yes; Ms. Bori , yes; Mr. Sprague,
yes; Mr. Saneholtz, ; Mr. Messineo, yes; r. Zimmerman, yes. pproved 7 -0.)
6. Area Rezoning 03 -073Z — Post Road /Avery Road to I -270
Anne Wanner said these 112 acres involve the properties along Post Road, including 12 homes.
Several parcels are now part of the expanded Coffman Park. This proposal is to establish the R-
1, Restricted Suburban Residential District for areas to the north of Post Road and LI, Limited
Industrial District to the south consistent with the historical zoning map. Ms. Wanner said six
people attended the informational meeting. This case includes the Dublin Justice Center, some
farmland, and other vacant land. She said staff recommends approval.
Joe Polis, said F, J & S Investments owns 5375 Post Road, and the LI allowable uses are totally
contrary to what Dublin really wants. For over ten years, staff has been pushing for park,
offices, and hotels. They bought this in 1986 for a proposed KinderCare which was disapproved.
In 1989, they applied for a building permit to build an office /warehouse, but Pat Bowman and
Bobbie Clarke asked them not to pursue it. Staffs reason was that the City had plans for a park
and a new City office complex in the area, and the proposed office /warehouse was not
compatible. Mr. Polis said they acquiesced and withdrew the permits.
In 1986, Dublin notified them that it was considering rezoning for several Post Road properties
to PLOR, Planned Laboratory, Office, and Research District. Dublin approved the Perimeter
Mall project in 1988, and that plan shows their site as a potential hotel. Mr. Polis said attorney
Harrison Smith said then, and it is still true, that the existing zoning, which was a combination of
LI and GI, is inappropriate. He presented some written documentation.
In 1997, Children's Hospital was interested in this site, but they built on Venture Drive because
the staff put them off. In 2000, Office Suites Plus wanted to build an office building, and staff
again discouraged them. Later, the staff wrote them a letter saying that office and hotel were
appropriate. He referred to the Dublin Community Plan and the Civic Center area plan, none of
which recommend the uses permitted in LL Mr. Polis said the LI zone, given everything that has
happened, did not make sense. Based upon prior Dublin input, he thought 99 percent of the LI
permitted uses would be discouraged. The conditional uses provide for even more unwanted
uses. In his opinion, enacting the proposed LI district would do nothing for the property, the
owner, the area, or the City. Proper uses would be office, hotel, community commercial,
institutional, laboratory, or research. He said that was the only usable zoning.
Ms. Clarke said Mr. Polis' comments reflect her recollection of these many events. The staff
believes that LI uses "stink," but the goal here is to establish clear Dublin zoning, not to take
away existing property rights. Dublin's zoning map has showed this property as LI for 20 years,
but staff cannot find an ordinance that conveyed LI zoning. This is also true for all "area
rezoning" cases. The staff was told to methodically establish Dublin zoning as separate from
township or county zoning. She said staff would be happy to work with Mr. Polis to zone the
parcel as SO, or an appropriate classification. That would be preferable, but that is not today's
assignment.
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and 'Zoning Commission
Minutes — September 18, 2003
Page 5
Mr. Gerber said if Mr. Polis wanted to change the zoning, he would have to file a rezoning
application. Ms. Clarke agreed.
Mr. Banchefsky said by ordinance, that upon annexation, Dublin is supposed to establish
appropriate zoning. While everybody agrees that LI is inappropriate, that is how this property
has always been shown. This project was undertaken because of municipal court decision. The
Law Director requested staff to check the entire City to make sure that it had established a
Dublin zoning category on every parcel. This is a housekeeping measure.
Mr. Sprague said since so much time has elapsed and so many changes have taken place, it might
be argued that it is now time for Dublin to establish a more appropriate zone. Perhaps the LI
zone at one time made sense, but that does not reflect current and likely future realities.
Mr. Banchefsky responded that typically, a landowner requests rezoning to a planned district.
He said a City- sponsored rezoning could not propose a planned district, with no text, etc. City
Council has the ability to apply a straight zoning district, if it chooses.
Mr. Sprague asked if this owner undertook a more appropriate rezoning, would the Commission
waive the application fee. Ms. Clarke said City Council decides fee waivers, but a
recommendation for approval could be forwarded. Another option might be another City -
sponsored rezoning at the request of the Commission.
Ms. Boring asked for more information on the 1986 zoning appeal cited. Ms. Clarke said a
subcommittee drafted a new district, the POLR District, to be used here. It caused an uproar and
did not go forward. Later, the Perimeter PCD rezoning (for the Ruscilli, Old Post Properties,
Metatec and McKitrick parcels) down -zoned the western two - thirds of this industrial area. It
also zoned residential uses close to Avery - Muirfield Drive. These pieces are the remnants.
Ms. Boring said she appreciated the explanation. However, if this gets official LI zoning, what
will restrict a U- Store -It? Ms. Clarke said for practical purposes, it has had LI zoning for many
years. It was that way on the zoning map since before she was hired. She said the development
standards are very difficult on a small parcel such as this.
There was some discussion of the planned district rezoning process in Dublin.
Mr. Gerber asked why Dublin had rejected Mr. Polis' proposals. Ms. Clarke responded that two
daycare centers' rezoning applications had been defeated in 1984 or 1985, shortly before she was
hired. She thought there had been resident opposition. Another complication arose from the
traffic study done for the Community Plan. It shows a fuzzy dashed line around the interchange,
indicating a future interchange improvement. She said the 1- 270 /US 33 interchange is expected
to break down in the future; it needs added capacity. One way to add capacity is to build grade -
separated ramps, but it might end up looking like a freeway in Los Angeles. That image was too
hard for Dublin to accept in the center of town during the Community Plan, and the result was a
dashed line around the interchange. Ms. Clarke did not know what the long -term answer was.
Ms. Clarke said this one -acre lot is not a commercial -sized piece, and it has difficult access due
to the proximity of the Post Road bridge over 1 -270. Even with these difficulties, she did not
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes — September 18, 2003
Page 6
think it would become a park without government intervention. There are several parcels that
could be joined for a development, perhaps an office or hotel.
Mr. Gerber said this was a housekeeping chore, and the site has been treated as LI for many
years. This application merely fixes that problem. He wanted to assure that Mr. Polis had the
use of his property for development. In fairness, he wondered if this should be tabled to allow
the staff and Mr. Polis to work through the issues.
Mr. Sprague asked if it was possible to exclude one parcel from the application this evening.
Ms. Clarke and Ms. Wanner agreed any parcel could be eliminated.
Ms. Boring appreciated the history, but anything other than LI will have a long process and much
discussion associated with it. It has been LI on the books for many years.
Mr. Sprague said adopting the LI, formalizes the "pickle factory" potential, and another solution
is needed. Ms. Boring said the other solution would be a PUD, natural materials, brick, etc.
Mr. Banchefsky said he discussed a similar situation with a member of City Council about a
different parcel. That property owner also wanted "usable" zoning, not what was shown in the
area rezoning. He cautioned that excluding one parcel may lead to many others.
Mr. Messineo said this request did not seem to be fully thought out.
Mr. Polis said they would very much like to work with staff to come up with a workable
rezoning. He and the abutting owners want to cooperate to come up with something workable.
He understands what the current zoning is, but they keep running into brick walls. He said they
understand that the Commission is not interested in many of the LI uses. For many of the uses,
their site is too small, even in conjunction with the abutting properties.
Ms. Boring said R, Rural or R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District, would be acceptable
to her. She did not want to set up false expectations, because this site will need to go through the
full zoning process. The Dublin zoning process is very comprehensive.
Mr. Polis understood. He said they have no perspective use. Their last use was for a two -story
office building on their site, the McKitrick site, and the Continental Real Estate site. They would
like the proper zoning for an office or hotel use, then they could attempt to find a use.
Mr. Ritchie did not see what would be gained if this were tabled or the parcel excluded. If the.
staff cannot devise another district, this area rezoning should be approved. Ms. Clarke feared
that any other acceptable zone might be interpreted by the owner as a taking. Both R -1 and R are
acceptable, but those would not solve the landowner's problem in trying to develop the land.
In response to a question from Mr. Saneholtz, Ms. Clarke said staff started with the zoning map
that had been in use for many years. Anne Wanner then spent hundreds of hours meticulously
tracking every legal description in every rezoning ordinance approved by Dublin's Village
Council or City Council. The ordinances were all mapped, and the remaining parcels have been
compiled geographically into these area - rezoning applications. The area rezonings include old
07 -0947
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes — September 18, 2003
Page 7
subdivisions, scattered homes, City -owned land, churches, schools, and some parcels such as this
with non - residential zoning on the map. These parcels have no zoning paper trail.
Mr. Gerber asked if the landowner can make an appointment in the Planning Division to review
their property for future development. Ms. Clarke said staff does that a dozen times a week. She
said the best guidance available is given by City Council, and that is largely consolidated in the
Community Plan. The staff provides whatever background and examples are available.
Ms. Clarke said she had consulted with Mr. Hammersmith during the meeting about access
restrictions that apply to this site. She said they believe there are three or four parcels fronting
on this section of Post Road that will need to use one combined curbeut. There needed to be
coordination among the three or four property owners for access.
Mr. Polis said that easement/access is in place for those three properties, and it was on his site.
Mr. Gerber agreed these were tough cases. He said this is a housekeeping measure, and the land
has been treated as industrial for many years. He did not think this property owner would find
the R or R -1 Districts to be acceptable. He said it was unlikely this site will stay industrial
forever. Mr. Polis agreed and said he wanted some type of zone with a proper use for the site.
He said he understood the need for the housekeeping measure, but he wanted it done right.
Mr. Saneholtz proposed tabling this so the staff could work with Mr. Polis. Ms. Wanner said the
staff has promised to complete these area rezonings this year if at all possible.
Ms. Boring said this should go forward. She recounted the problems Dublin encountered in
putting SO zoning at the corner of Post Road and Avery - Muirfield Drive. She sympathized with
Mr. Polis, but she thought he needed to go through the usual zoning process to get his land zoned
for appropriate development. This is an important area, as defined by the Community Plan. She
appreciated Mr. Polis updating her. Since it is housekeeping, she was ready to vote.
Mr. Messineo agreed. He did not want to assume the responsibility of a perceived taking.
Mr. Sprague said from an administrative perspective, this should be handled tonight. There
should be an understanding that staff needs to work with Mr. Polis. Mr. Zimmerman agreed.
Mr. Ritchie supported this and thought they should move forward.
Mr. Gerber suggested a concept plan or an informal review to get Commission feedback. He
encouraged Mr. Polis to talk with the staff about his ideas.
Mr. Ritchie made the motion to approve this area rezoning because it will apply an appropriate
Dublin zone, will provide for effective development administration, will maintain the established
development pattern, and is consistent with the Community Plan. Mr. Messineo seconded, and
the vote was as follows: Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms.
Boring, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Messineo, yes; and Mr. Ritchie, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) Mr.
Gerber asked Mr. Polis to keep the Commission apprised. Mr. Polis thanked the Commission.
Mr. Gerber thanked Ms. Wanner for her hard work on these area rezonings and good staff report.
Mr. Gerber called a short recess at 7:45 p.m
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin City Council Minutes
July 21, 2003
INTRODUCTION /FIRST READING - ORDINANCES
ZONING MATTERS
Mayor McCash moved to waive the Rules of Council and read Ordinances 84 -03, 85 -03,
86 -03 and 87 -03 together.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuerchcr seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Leciclider, yes; Mayor
McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuerchcr, yes.
Ordinance 84 -03
Establishing Dublin Zonin for 26 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 112
Acres, as Annexed from Washington Township in 1966 and 1973, Generally on the
South Side of Brand Road, East of Coffman Road, and West of Dublin Road, as R -1,
Restricted Suburban Residential District and LI, Limited Industrial District (Case No. 03-
0732 - Post Road /Avery Road to I -270 Rezoning).
Ordinance 85 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 12 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 83
Acres, as Annexed from Washington Township in 1965, 1973, 1980, and 1988, Generally
on the South Side of Brand Road, East of Coffman Road, and West of Dublin Road, as
R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District and R, Rural District (Case No. 03 -0722 -
Coffman Road to Dublin Road, between Brand Road and I -270).
Ordinance 86 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 13 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 24
Acres, as Annexed from Washington Township in 1973, Generally on the South Side of
Brand Road, West of Coffman Road, as R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District
(Case No. 03 -071Z - Coffinan Road /Brand Road).
Ordinance 87 -03
Establishing Dublin Zoning for 18 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 150
Acres, as Annexed from Washington and Jerome Townships in 1973 and 1999, Generally
on the North Side of Post Road, between Hyland -Croy and Muirfield Drive, as R -1,
Restricted Suburban Residential District and R, Rural District (Case No. 03 -07OZ - Post
Road to Brand Road, West of Muirfield Drive and East of Hyland -Croy Road).
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher introduced Ordinances 84 -03, 85 -03, 86 -03 and 87 -03 and moved
referral to the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Mr. Leciclider seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes;
Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Leciclider, yes.
07- 094`Z,
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting
April 4, 1994
Mayor Campbell not"at both applications will byEnsideved by Council at Jhl meeting.
V W93 - An Ordinance vidiog for a Change of ing of 111.203 Ames on the East Side of C gray Road Approsima 1000 Feet to the N of ad from: PIP, ned Industrial Park D' d to: PIP, Planned In . I (Sports Ohio) «d Reading) (Applicant- Allen S. Shepherd III 6 CoIV , , ff 43002)
Ms. Clarke noted that addendum to the text h been distributed tonight, she requests that
this be inomflorat nm the text for this r= rag. The text includes 1 age stating that these
buildings canno used for industrial uses a pointed out that Comic " approving with this t
her
the area of s ack reduction but trot th rb cuts. She emphas" at te is an uttders ding
that the a of amusement areal will remain as presently ovemed by Dublin's
if
K4rs. King moved approv Ordina th our conditions from PI 'rag Commission
and with the addition a text of thn the nature of the fun and the overhead
walkway, az contai on insert 6A sttcil tonight.
Mr. Scrip seam dte motion -
Vote on the dinance - Mayor Cams. King, yes; . Kransmber, yes; Mr yes; Mc " waly, yes; Mrs, Boring, well, yes -
OrfiiCiance No. 96-93 - An Or ' race Providing fora nge of 7.oning of 3.679 of Lend
led on the Northeast rner of Innovation D ' (Cormmly Enterprise ' e) and Wilcox
Road from: RI, Rest ' ed Industrial Distri : So, Suburban Offr and Institutional
District. (Third R ' g) (Applicant: DCP A istes, P.O. Box 370, in, OH 43017)
Mrs K ing YI veil approval with �thondifions of Planning Co ' sion.
Mrs. King idea the motion.
Vote on a Ordinance - Mc. Stri s. Boring, yes; Mr tuber, yes; Mr. Zawal yes;
Mrs. in es; Mrs. Stillwell es; Mayor Campbell, yes
rdinance No. 11493
and Located on th
rburban Resid m
mily develo ent kr
mth High eel, Coll
cra b moved a
r Campbell seconded
ed
Vote on the Ordinance A
Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. I
to the 17 conditions imposed by Planning Commission.
Strip, yes; Mr. Krarsmber, es; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes;
rag, yes; Mayor Campbey. yes.
Ordinance No. 18 -94 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 48.049 Ames or
Land I_OCated on the Northwest Corner of Post Road and Coffman Road from: R -1, Restricted
Suburban Residential District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Coffman Park)
(third Reading) (Applicant: Timothy C. Hanley, City of Dublin, 6665 Coffman Road)
Mayor Campbell stated that since many public bearings have been held on the rezoning for the
Community Center, tonight's testimony should address concerns which have not been discussed
previously.
Nl 27 TArg Hill expressed concern that the third entrance to the park is back on
the design board again. She does not believe the third entrance from Tara Hill is justified, as all of
the Metro Parks in the Columbus area have only one entrance.
Discussion followed about the traffic consultant's determination that three entrances will be necessary
for the Center.
Mayor Campbell emphasized that there is some question as to whether it was necessary for the City
to go through a rezoning process for the Center since recreational uses are already permitted in
Coffman Park. The City has held all of the hearings on the Community Center to allow for public
input in the process. The traffc issues have been discussed at length in many meetings by citizens,
1� .1
07 -0941
1Zezo ltllg
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Roar
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3
April 4, 1994
staff and consultants.
Mrs. Stillwell commented that the community on Tara Hill is looking to the City for some assurance
that any traffic impacts will be mitigated. Council needs to recognize and respect the concerns of
the Tara Hill residents who will be substantially affected by this rezoning.
Mayor Campbell noted that the entrance to Coffman Park has always existed from Tara Hill.
Eliminating the Tara Bill entrance would require a totally different design of the other two entrances
because of the increased volumes of traffic.
Mr. Kr suggested that Council accept new public testimony at this time, discuss the issues,
and then proceed to a vote.
M94 Goetz 5 617 Tara Hill stated that he would like clarification on what Council is voting on
tonight and what recourse the residents would have after that.
Mayor Campbell responded that Council is voting on the rezoning of the park which is a PUD
containing the site plan for the building, the building itself, and how it will fit on the site, including
the three entrances. The recourse to residents following Council's vote would be a referendum. Ile
believes Council has taken ample testimony from all sides on the issues raised with the rezoning.
Mr. Goelz stated that the Tara Hill residents are opposed to the third entrance. 11c doesn't believe
Council is listening to the residents on this issue.
Discussion followed about procedures for the residents who desire to fight the rezoning.
Ms- Clarke pointed out that in this particular case, the site is already zoned for a park. The building
is permissible tight stow. The city is going through this rezoning process to go on record to say
what the plan is, what the buffers will be, and to assure that the standards are higher than are
required in the R -1 zoning. She cautioned the residents that challenging this plan or the PUD zoning
does not, in her view, negate permissible zoning to build this building in accordance with this plan
on this site. She added that if the traffic on Tara Hill becomes disruptive to the neighborhood,
Council will direct staff to find a way to solve the problem.
Discussion continued about the possibility of leaving the Tara Hill entrance issue open.
Mrs. King noted that Council members have made a commitment to be responsive to the citiz .
If any aspect of the project becomes an issue at a later date, Council will listen to the citizens. She
hopes that Mr. Goelz will look at a range of options open to him on this issue.
Discussion continued about the possibility of phasing the entrances. Mr. Poegler unphasized that
the traffic consultant has recommended that the entire parking lot be built in Phase One because time
peak hour generators are ail Phase 1 elements.
.Mss. King toted that the reason the Metro Parks have only one emrance is for security reasons and
for permit purposes.
An tmidentifted audience member stated that she has concerns about the teenagers speeding on'fara
[fill. The police will not be around to monitor the speeding at the cutryway to the Center.
Mr. Zawaly responded that this underscores the Point that the residents should continue to work with
staff to address these issues. Perhaps a gate could he added at the entrance to eliminate usage except
during peak events.
Mrs. Stillwell asked about the status of adding a Condition A'6 regarding the drainage. Condition
i6 would state that, 'Drainage at the northern boundary of the site will be improved to the extent
possible to improve the situation, but in any case, not making the situation worse.'
Mayor Campbell responded that Council had agreed to add this condition.
Mr. Zawaly moved approval of Ordinance 18 -93 with the 6 conditions static.
Mrs. King seconded the motion.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Z�wal yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kransmber, yes;
Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes-
07-094Z
Rezoning
5MO, 5808, 58S6, 5904 Post Road
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4
April 4, 1994
Mayor Campbell stated that Ordinance 19 -94 is approved subject to the six conditions. He urged
residents in the neighbo m wort with staff to mitigate their concerns.
Ordnance No. I - An Ordinance Au 'ng the Regutalion of (fie on Mufrfineld Drive
and Other Row in Muirfield During t moral Memorial Tou ent. (Third Reading)
Vote on the inane - Mr. 7awa1 yes; Mrs. Boring. yes rs. Kraratuber. yes; Mayor
Campbel es; Mrs. King, Yes; Ma tillwell. yes; Mr. Strip es"
nance /�y 0.94 (Am ed) - A Ordinance ending Chapter 717 of the Codifi
tvarmcet Cily o bGn, Ohio. (Peddlers d Soliti[oa) (Third Reading)
Mr" Banchefoint out that a couple of mino angel are included in the amended ion,
where instead f ing 10 charitable organmzaf as 'locally" recognized religious or writable,
the word =Uskled as been removed.
Mrs. K' bout feed back soli ' ed from the schools regarding the o nance, since the
stud are
so often involved with raisers that consist of door- todoor s
ey onded that s tends to contact the schools after th egislation is passed by
nraT. ThritableJreligi /srdtooi groups have been supportive this ordinance because the
area has beeged wi many private outside profit making oups" He added that at this
time, the conity n this legislation. The ordinance c be modified at a later date i(
necessary.
Discussion fed about the inclusion of civic groups n the religious or charitable designatio h was [fie co us of Council that civic groups wo he included in the designation"
Mayor I pointed out that the word "In y' also should be /additionrrection Number
9. . amend the ordinan
r. Saip n owed as submitted tonight, with t on Page
3, Number 9, and to approve the o umce.
Mr. Kranstuber seconded die Vote on the motion - Mr. K tuber, yes; Mr_ Strip, yes; Mr. 7_aes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillw 1 , yes; Mayor Campbell, yes-
Or
nance No. 21 - An Ordinance Amending the Mnua ppropriations Ordinance for the
Fiscal Year Fnd' lyete,tmber 31, 1994. (for Instaitalio f lraftic signal and left turn lanes at
Bright Roe verside Drive intersection) (Second R ing)
Mrs. Bolin pointed out That information was prov' to Council in a previous packet regar ng
the p ed trffi
ac signal. Staff has recommend installation of the signal.
Ra mm8v Roth. Fast Dublin Civic Assn iaf a resentative stated that they see this iss as a city -
wide one: The Association has voted to pport a lowering of the speed limit on venide Drive
to no more than 45 mph. They are al ncemed about the number of curb cuts Riverside Drive
a would life to see the speed tmit lowered after the traffic light is malted" Staff has
recommended this an traffic signal f safety reasons. Visibility is the problem this intuseaion more
th anything else. Traffic h Is may not solve the problem" The A ciation is
and
Council
m support the installation the signal at this time.
hn F T u pointed out that documentation m experts and from staff clearly
points out urmavi s support of this traffic light. The City sit has an obliga[ioe to provide safe
passage throw its roadways to those living outside of D in" Growdt in Dublin will continue m
generate hi er volumes of traffic. This is only one o everd traffic light issues /,,,d,,
before Safety Committee in the years to come.
/w= g also [toted that Perry Towmh" Fire Chief Olney reports [hat an involved more severe injuries an other intersections" He believes
seriously consider installation of this si
Mr. Strip pointed out that the a enditure for this signal will be nearly 00,000" He does
understand and supports then for its installation. 07 -094Z
I
Mrs. King added that expenditure also includes the road wi oning for the traffic signal RCZ0111119
installation_ She Bugg M possibly phasing the implementation that lane widenings occur first_ 58i0O, 5868, 58'86, 5904 1 Road
The city would then erne the benefit of the lights to the south - north by the time the widening
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5
March 21, 1994
including mipKgreens. 162 lots of 80
are 20.3 3des of open space - The
provis' for bikepaths- The deve
zcmi pg Commission meetings. e
inytilving the Stream that m Hour
f n width, with cut- de-sac lots
W is landscape detail along A
ter has enjoyed the support o re
plan is a workable one, p icula
It the center.
4"glidy less in width. There
Road, street lighting and
residents at the Planning &
y with respect to the issup4
Mrles Hebert. 1'MIf 1 ddresse] Council in regard to is hydraulic study of the stream. ey are
requesting dranneliz on in the area of an existing eam crossing where sediment h clogged the
stream. He It that they ran perform the FP A revision and demonstrate that a developable
areas wilt be of the 100 -year hood plain. A hydraulic study will be done demonstrate no
adverse imp to contiguous upstream la owners. Another hydrologic s y will be prepared
reflectin n-site stormwater detention, . omtrating n er
o ativse impact downstream property
7:1, a result of stormwaz" run from the site -
re rat additional q lesti from Council.
l be a third readin f the ordinance at tire April 4 L ncil meeting.
Ordinance No. 18 -94 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of zoning of 48.049 Acres of
Land Located on the Northwest Corner of Post Road and Coffman Road from: R -1, Restricted
Suburban Residential District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Coffman Park)
(Public Hearing) (Applicant: Timothy C. Hanley, City of Dublin, 6665 Coffman Road)
Registered as proponents were Mitchell Grant, 6699 Willowgrove Lane, Dublin; Janet Jordan, 6665
Coffman Road, Mark Gialucca, 523 W. Park Street, and Mark Bodein, 1776 E. Broad Street,
Columbus, Ohio. Registered as opponents were William Zimlich, 5431 Tara Hill Drive; S.N.
Goya], 5407 Tara Hill; R.L. Goetz, 5617 Tara Hill; R.G. Hodel, 5587 Tara Hill; Eric Silver, 6933
FErnesl Way; Tom Buchan, D29 Tara (fill; and hill lutasek, 5677'rara Hill.
Ms. Clarke stated that the application is a combined concept plan and preliminary development plan.
The City now owns all 46 acres which is currently zoned R -1. Staff believes the PUD zoning would
be appropriate since it requires that the City provide the most definable set of its aspirations of how
the land will be developed. In this rezoning, the City is the applicant and is acting as the developer
of the 46 acres, 28 of which have been owned by the City for a decade or more and an additional
18 which was recently purchased from the Thomas family. She then showed slides of the site and
described the surrounding area.
Ms. Clarke noted that two public meetings have been held recently on the Community Recreation
Cent" plans -one for the perimeter property owners to preview the plan and another at the Planning
Commission. Substantial concerns have been raised about the traffic planning, and Doyle Clear front
Barton- Aschman is present to address these issues tonight. His report was contained in the packet.
Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning with 5 conditions:
1. That the text and plan information be reconciled to be consistent;
2. That the recommendation of the traffic consultant be incro orated to provide optimal traffic
flow and circulation;
3. That the bridge, grading and improvements be designed and installed in compliance with
FEMA regulations regarding flood hazard areas;
4. That the plan be resubmitted for amendment if determined! to be inconsistent with the final
recommendations of the Cothran Park Master Plan;
S. That an application be filed wilt the fktard of Zoning Appeals if determined to be an
appropriate measure by the Law Director, with regard to tie floodway plus 20 feet
regulations.
1�'ly.�l Barton- Aschm stated that he was asked by staff to review traffic impact and parking
associated with the proposed Recreation Cent ". He looked at three different possible maximum use
scenarios and came up with a maximum parking demand of about 350 to 360 cars. Ile is
recommending the full maximum number of parking spaces be built is phase one because the need
will be there. He noted that the access point from Tara Hill is a critical one for the site, estimated
to serve about 25 percent of tire people coming to the Center, Eliminating the access point on Tara
Hill will net reduce the traffic volumes using'rara hill to get to another entrance to the Center from
Coffman or Post. The Tara Hill entrance will serve as a neightodood access site, while the Post
Road entrance will serve tire regional traffic. Tire access from Coffman Road will tic utilized more
when die road is improved and a left turn lane is added. fn addition, his firm has worked with die
site planners to provide adaprate turning radii for buses and to provide ample dronoff and dirk -iin
zones at the Center. 07 -0947
Rczoliing
5800, 5868, 5856, 5904 Post Road
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
of _ Dublin City Council Meofag Page 6
March 21, 1994
Discussion followed about the traffic patterns, the driving time study, and flit updare of the
Thoroughfare Plan with the Community, plan update.
neigh bo 4!A!UW"`—.Tys'r3_�Il malcnbM" noted that (be (bwnpatrick entrance would be a gated
neighrhood entrance. The ( utility administrator would determine whether it is closed each evening
no left open. Ile then provided information on fire grading and buffering issues. The finished floor
elevation of the building will be about 3 to 4 fen blow the elevation of the earth property line. The
slope will be south toward the Indian Run, and thus the parking lot will be about 3 her lower than
the property line. This will prevent the car lights from shining in the windows of the neighbors in
the rotth. lie then described the buffering to be installed on the site.
At this point, Mayor Campbell invited the public to testify.
Mi { £ hi _� lany stated that ere is the Vice President of the Willow (:rove
Condominium Owners Association and repres 107 unit owners. The Association's nuraberone
concern is traffic and the difficulty in making a left turn out of Willow Grove_ lie asked that
Council kegs in mini W nn
We 103 unit owners in planning for the Colima" Road widening and flm
Recreation Cerucr.
Iil9S1.14f9An Pa r y if RCcr"3Kion f*Sglor stated that she is present to answer any questions from
Council.
Mr. 7awaly asked what would be in lice space that will ultimately be occupied by Phase 2 during
the [merim period between Phase 1 and 2.
Ms. Jordan responded that it will be lawn space and some minor landscaping that will be movable.
Mr. Krareduber asked her to confirm the grouodbreaking date for the site as Memorial Day.
Ms. Jordan responded (flat late spring or early smomer is still the (accord timeframe.
_ L4 fok Pglgyn__Mstgly N(flaq, architects for the Cen(cr, stated that they are very pleased with the way
the plan has dcvcbiped. lie offered to answer any questions.
,ya'illianr 7imlith_ $4 }I T_Ara)[ll, stated that he has delivered a Inter to Nt Mayor from a ncighbbc.
Mr. and Mrs. fee.
Mayor Campbell responded that the later will be included in the package of Inters on the reaoning
issue, The Lees ale concerned about the traffic issues involving Tara Hill,
Mr. Zimlich expressed concern about the traffic issues and volumes of existing traffic from the high
Schmml. lie and his neighbors have existing i with drainage arouml their homes a are
concerned that mmrnding could worsen the problent. They look forward to having a "good
nciehbor" in their back yard, but don't want any more associated traffic problems,
S N (l gyal 54Q7 TAp I{i{f stated film Council should consider building a walkway or bicycle path
instead of a roadway from Tara Ilin. Ile is very concnmxl with existing traffic problems ou Tara
[fill, and tine Center would add to them. He noted that his sump pump is running around the clock
and has been replaced twice. With the added fix covexage of tine Center, he is afraid that his
drainage problems will worsen.
4.Si4i!L_Xti"j�'ArA_ bill stated that the Conununhy Center makes some overall, hot he has
concerns with the volume of traffic entering the Center from Tan [fill and the possibility of
dilficuhy in parking along Tara Ifili. Dropping off children at the Center could cause congestion
i problems on Tara hill, lie is also looking for some assurances from the city about resolution of the
drainage situation.
Mr. Gialucca responded, stating that cristing drainage will be improved along the property line
during Ne cumaunnion process. Most of doe project will drain to the south.
- Discussion followed about the possibility of palrons of the Center parting on Tara [fill and walking
to the Cemer.
Ms. Clacke Commented t (he distance (tom the Center's front door to Tara Hill will discourage
parking on Tara Hill. During maim, events such as the Irish Festival, the City may have to monitor
parking and possibly use the high school parking lot.
during these evrn(s. h Puking could be prohibited on Tara
Mr. fHWO 5U TAra If ill cmanum col that he secs Ike Tara hill access point not as a wer ttdgbbo[Irood
access but ra as a 'funnel" for large amounts of traffic. fle does rtoi believe 45 fen is an
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Roacl
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7
March 21.1994
adequate buffer for 350 cars and buses. During the peak usage time in the winter, there will be no
foliage on the trots. Ile trusts the City and Council to take care of die drainage problem and the
traffic amcerns. 'The proposed Rm Center building is beautiful.
Ear_Silyfd. Wj, rj=LWAy stated that he has lived in Dublin 10 days. More pumba sing a home
i in Dublin. he checked with the City regarding plans for the park. lie was told that these would not
be am access from Tara [fill at that time, but he understands that things can change. lie has
concerns with the quality of life issue (or residents of Tara Hill, lie believes dox,, will be much
more traffic through Tara Hill than has been estimated by the City's tratfic crogd nth
T4[q l�fijaq Tara
"ill stated that he has recently purchased his home. He, loo, haz rnmcerfts
with the access from Tara Hill and the safety issues which will result for the small children living
in the area. Ile suggests moving the parking area m the Post Road entrance instead of adjacent to
the Tara Hill entrance. lie would prefer that the Tara [fill entrance be a pedestrian accessway. Ile
Aso requests that A green area be maintained in the park area behind die homes on Tara Hilt -
hill jiti - As -k - 527 Tyra Hill stared that he has nothing further to add to what has been testified.
Mrs. Hering asked if consideration was given to moving die parking lot to the Post Road entrance.
Ms. Clarke responded that it was considered but did not fit in that area. --
Mrs. King suggested adding a Condition 16 stating that the drainage at the northern boundary of the
site will be improved, or whatever language would be appropriate to make this commitment to the
residents of the adjacent properties.
Mayor Campbell indicated ([hat he would favor adding such a condition.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that sore of the existing problems do nor relate to the Recreation
Center, but to the extent that trey can be improved, he would support such a condition.
Ms. Clarke noted that insofar as it is within the City's ability to regrade the area to improve the
drainage, this would be possible. Many areas of Dublin, however, have high ground water resulting '
in continual operation of sump pumps. The City cannot change the ground water level with the
regrading.
Mrs. King noted that she is referring out to subterranean drainage but to surface drainage. She is
hopeful that regrading the area can improve the surface drainage.
Mr. Kranstuber suggested that the added condition include language, 'to the extent possible to
improve the situation, but in any case, out making the situation worse.'
'There will be a third leading of the ordinance A the April 4 Council meeting.
(h N 106 -93 - An Ordinmi to Accept an Annexation of 2 nt
6 +/- AatS in Jerome
Township, nion County to tire C" y of Dublin. (Cabled Ordinan (Applica: Harrison W.
Smith, 1 Agent for Peritiomx awnee Hills lard Company, 31 Post Road, Dublin, OH
43017
Ma r Canspbcli noted that a his been given a copy of a 1 sent to Steve Smith by If son
S ith requesting that this - em be fell on the table and hdd vet until the second April ing of
until.
Mrs. King asked y this item should not be tabled i efinitely. In this way, Can ' can determine
�. al which point take it off the table.
Steve Smi staled that Council can table do udebnitely if they wish. Ile ed that Council has
120 da following the first reading to to action on an annexation peri ' n. Harrison Smith haz
retry ed the later April melting date ' order to respond to issues pr iously raised by Council
Ayer Campbell commented Ilia( y item that is tabled requires ion from Council to r e it
from fire table. thus, proCedur y , he believes it would be ap update to table items ind mitely
since they will always requir coon from Council to remove ¢m from the table. Tab' g until a -
mrUin date dues not necc lily indicate that Council will 00se to remove the iron a that date.
Following brie( disci ion, Mayor Campbell stated Council may choose to a items off the
table, but in order o provide adequate notice to i'fttted parties. Council ould then set the
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Itoad
RECORD OF ACTION
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Marcit 10, 1994
11F fit HLIN
"The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action in the application below at its
regular meeting:
9. Rezoning Application Z94 -001- Combined Concept and Preliminary Development Plans
- Community Recreation Center - Coffman Park
Location: 46 acres located on the northwest corner of Post and Coffman Roads.
Existing Zoning: R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District.
Request: To rezone the property to the PUD, Planned Unit Development District; this is
a request for a combined review of the Concept Plan and the Preliminary Development Plan
under the PUD regulations of Section 1181.07.
Proposed Use: Proposed community center of over 100,000 square feet in addition to park
uses, Fletcher Coffman homestead and Dublin Municipal Building.
Applicant:. City of Dublin, c/o Parks and Recreation Department, 6665 Coffman Road,
Dublin; OH 43017.
MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with the following five conditions:
1) That the text and plan information be reconciled to be consistent;
2) That the recommendations of the traffic consultant be incorporated to provide optimal traffic
flow and circulation;
3) That the bridge, grading and improvements be designed and installed- incompliance with
FEMA regulations regarding flood hazard areas;
4) That the plan be resubmitted for amendment if determined to be inconsistent with the final
recommendations of the Coffman Park Master Plan; and
5) That an application be filed with the Board of Zoning Appeals, if determined to be an
appropriate measure by the Law Director, with regards to the floodway plus 20 feet
regulations.
The four bases for this motion are:
1) The proposal is consistent with the purpose and approval criteria of Section 1181.07
governing Planned Unit Developments in the Planning and Zoning Code.
2) The plan uses and maintains the site's natural environmental features.
3) The proposal conforms to the recommendations of the Community Plan and the Coffman
Park Master Plan.
07 -0942
Rezoning
Page 1 of 2 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
RECORD OF ACTION
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
March 10, 1994
9. Rezoning Application Z94- 001 - Combined Concept and Preliminary Development Plans
- Community Recreation Center - Coffman Park (Continued)
4) The design is sensitive to the residential surroundings and neighborhood into which it will
be placed.
*Barbara M. Clarke, representing the City of Dublin, agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 7 -0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved.
STAFF CERTIFICATION:
Barbara M. Clarke
Director of Planning
07 -0942
Rezoning
Page 2 of 2 5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - March 10, 1994
Page 16
X-Mt his recd mendation are as follow:
plat as modified above the requirements of the Subd' lion Code and
strict.
romotes die coord' development of the area as sports park w hich is
with the surroun ' g development. inary plat con to the goals of the Communi 'Ian and the Southwest Area
Plan.
Mr. Shepherd acMfted the above conditions.
Mr. seconded the motion and th ote was as follows: MrMr, . a'ara, yes; Mr.
Peplo yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. ber, yes. Ms. Chimhici -Zu , .yes; Mr. Rauh,
y . Fishman, yes. (Approved 7 .
9. Rezoning Application Z94-001- Combined Concept and Preliminary Development Plans
- Community Recreation Center - Coffman Park
Bobbie Clarke presented this case and area slides. This is a rezoning application with a
combined concept and preliminary development plan. Coffman Park is currently zoned R -1,
estricted Suburban Residential District, which permits churches, schools, parks and one -acre
single - family residential development. The City is undertaking to rezone this property to a
PUD, Planned Unit Development District, in order to set forth its ultimate development proposal
for the park and to provide a measure of certainty for the abutting neighborhood.
Ms. Clarke said the existing 28 -acre park is only half developed with all the facilities on the
southern end along the Indian Run. The City is buying more land to the west to bring the
overall acreage of the park to approximately 46 acres. Amain entry is proposed along Post
Road and a neighborhood entrance for the Tara Hill neighborhoods willbe through Downpatrick
Drive. Play areas for children are planned along wittvshelterhouses,.and a community stage.
Ms. Clarke indicated on a slide a landmark oak tree which will.belooato at+:the main driveway
and a new pond. She said approximately 250 parking spaces are planned for the ±70,000
square foot Community recreational cen ter.
Phase I is proposed to have a senior citizens activity room, a competitive swimming pool and
a leisure pool, several classrooms, a gym, and administrative offices. The second phase will
include a blackbox theater and a major community room. Only the first phase is currently
funded. A lawn will be maintained for community events. The major feature of the overall
architecture will be a slide into the pool, and in the second phase the slide will be repeated at
the opposite end. The interior of the building will include a lot of timber. The exterior
materials will be mainly stone and dryvit, wood trim, and a standing seam metal roof.
ifs. Clarlm presented a slide indicating the buffers between the park and the neighbors. Ms.
Clarix felt that the City wants to be a good neighbor and would go through the same test as a
developer. The preliminary development plan is the rezoning document- She said City Council
07-094Z
Reronin
5800, , 58681, 5886, 5904 Post Road d
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - March 10, 1994
Page 17
desired to get the administrative paperwork underway quickly, and the public hearing for this
rezoning application is scheduled for March 21.
Staff recommends approval of this combined Concept Plan and Preliminary Development Plan
with the following five conditions:
1) That the text and plan information be reconciled to be consistent;
2) That the recommendations of the traffic consultant be incorporated to provide optimal traffic
flow and circulation;
3) That the bridge, grading and improvements be designed and installed in compliance with
FEMA regulations regarding flood hazard areas;
4) That the plan be resubmitted for.amendmeat if det ermined to.be:inconsistent witty the final
recommendations of the Coffman Park Master Plan; and
5) That an application, be filed with the Board ' of- Zoning Appeals, if determined to be an
appropriate measure by the Law Director.
Staff believes this is an enormous recreational opportunity for the Community and hopes that by
this application the City will meet every reasonable standard.
Ms. Clarke accepted all the conditions listed above on behalf of the City.
`2r. Kranstuber reviewed the application process to date. He said on March 7 City Council
.agned off subject to the Parks Committee's review. The Parks and Recreation Committee had
a public hearing. on March 9 at which a number. of residents were present. The Committee
signed off on behalf of Council at that meeting.
Mr. Satya Goyal, 5407 Tara Hill Drive, said he chose his house because it was next to a park,
not a building. He objected to the building because it would add additional traffic on his street.
Mr. Goyal.said he had signed a petition and is getting :the- runaround. Mr. Fishman said the
neighborhood would not have good access without .that entrance.
Mr. Sutphen said that was a park entrance as far back as 1983.
Ms. Clarke said last month all the contiguous neighbors on Valleydown, Shannon Park Drive,
and 'Tara hill Drive were invited to meeting a to discuss their concerns. The neighbors felt
impacted by the traffic created by the high school and did not want cut - through traffic. Barton -
Aschman Associates, Inc. of Ohio has specifically been hired to address access traffic issues.
Mr. Sutphen made the motion to approve this combined Concept and Preliminary Development
Plan with the following five conditions and based on the following four bases:
1) That the text and plan information be reconciled to be consistent;
2) That the recommendations of the traffic consultant be incorporated to provide optimal traffic
flow and circulation;
1) That the bridge, grading and improvements be designed and installed in compliance with
FEMA regulations regarding flood hazard areas;
07 -0942
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - March 10, 1994
^age 18
4) That the plan be resubmitted for amendment if determined to be inconsistent with the final
recommendations of the Coffman Park Master Plan; and
5) That an application be filed with the Board of Zoning Appeals, if determined to be an
appropriate measure by the Law Director; with regards to the floodway plus 20 feet
regulation.
Bases:
1) The proposal is consistent with the purpose and approval criteria of Section 1181.07
governing Planned Unit Developments in the Planning and Zoning Code.
2) The plan uses and maintains the site's natural environmental features.
3) The proposal conforms to the recommendations of the Community Plan and the Coffman
Park Master Plan.
4) The design is sensitive to the residential surroundings and: neighborhood.into which it will
be placed.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher seconded the motion. TUe.vote -was as follows: Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr.
Peplow, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Sutphen,
yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Approved 7 -0.)
Mr. Kranstuber said the bridge ground breaking was scheduled to be around Memorial Day and
building ground breaking by the end of 1994 with occupancy by the end of 1995.
10. Disenssio - Sign Code U to
Ms. announced tha omas McCash of th of Zoning A ould fill the
on the Sign Cod ub- Committee (m lieu Becky Saylor) along wi ee Chinnici-
ercher and Daniel tphea.
Mr. Ferrara if banners such as th in Old Dublin were co deredIor.,.the. side of
Dublin the river. Ms. Clarlm " those banners•.were to: the one - that ent across
Bridge at the Old Fireho ovation. She and concern abo :the east side
of Dublin and felt it uld be considered. Mr. earara felt the sure for Dublin
w d be greater in an area s as Dublin Village
Respectfully submitted,
Libby Farley
Planning Division Secretary
07 -094L
Rezoning
5800, 5868, 5886, 5904 Post Road