Loading...
Ordinance 07-10RECORD OF ORDINANCES Ordinance No. 07 -10 Passed 20 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.68 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF PERIMETER DRIVE AND PERIMETER LOOP ROAD WITHIN PERIMETER CENTER FROM PCD, PLANNED COMMERCE DISTRICT (SUBAREAS J AND D) AND PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (SUBAREA J -1) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT - MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP, VOLVO EXPANSION (MAG) (CASE 09- 108Z/PDP) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, - 4,/ of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A ") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit 'B ", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C ", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of 12 2010. Mayor - Pres' ng Officer ATTEST: o oei�� 0'0ZA4k1X-- Clerk of Council AMENDED 02 -22 -10 CITY OF DUBLIN. Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614- 410 -4490 To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Terry Foegler, City Manager Date: February 18, 2010 Memo Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 07 -10 -Rezoning — MAG, Midwestern Auto Group, Volvo Expansion, 6325 & 6335 Perimeter Loop Road (Case No. 09- 108Z/PDP). Update Ordinance 07 -10 was introduced at the February 8, 2010 City Council meeting. Some concerns were expressed regarding the original 1998 zoning and development plan approval for this site as it pertains to vehicular display. Specifically, the question was raised of whether the vehicle display areas were designed and constructed as described by the applicant. Planning has conducted several site inspections, most recently in November when the current rezoning application was filed. The inspections confirmed that the design, construction and landscaping of the vehicle display areas meet the development plan and the development text. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 07 -10 at the second reading/public hearing on February 22, 2010 with the eight conditions appended by Planning & Zoning Commission on January 21, 2010. CrrY OF DUBLIN_ Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 Phone: 614 - 410 -4400 • Fax: 614410 -4490 To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Terry Foegler, City Manager 19— Date: February 4, 2010 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director, Land Use and Long Range Planning Memo Re: Ordinance 07 -10 – Rezoning – MAG, Midwestern Auto Group, Volvo Expansion, 6325 and 6335 Perimeter Loop Road (Case No. 09- 108Z/PDP). Summary Ordinance 07 -10 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan for 15.69 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group Campus) for the purpose of expanding the site to accommodate a building addition and associated site improvements, and to ensure the continued consolidated and orderly function of this auto dealership campus. History The Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District was originally approved in 1988, encompassing land between Avery - Muirfield Drive and Emerald Parkway, divided into subareas A through M. Permitted uses include commercial, industrial, residential, and office. A 14 -acre Subarea J of the Perimeter Center plan was created in 1998 specifically for auto dealerships and other uses, with several automotive franchises as a part of the Midwest Auto Group (MAG) campus. In 1998, a separate Land Rover building was added to the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission has approved several amended plans for the site, including building expansions and a skywalk to connect the existing buildings and an expansion for the Jaguar automotive brand. None of these modifications have been built and will be void with approval of this rezoning/prelimmary and final development plan. Subarea J -1 was established in 2008 to accommodate the temporary relocation of parking for construction of an anticipated building expansion for the MAG campus. The applicant has since decided to significantly alter the plans for an expansion requiring rezoning the site and incorporating additional land for portions of Subarea J -1 and Subarea D. Economic Impact The expansion of MAG's campus to include the Volvo dealership moving from Linworth to Dublin will initially result in 30 new jobs, and $1.2 million in new MAG payroll ($24,000 annually in income tax withholdings). Additionally, this new construction project is located in a Tax Increment Financing District (the Ruscilli TIF), thus increasing the service payments the City captures to pay for surrounding public infrastructure improvements. Memo re. Ordinance 07 -10 — Rezoning — MAG, Volvo Expansion February 4, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Future Campus Expansion The applicant is proposing in the relatively near future a relocated BMW facility from Post Road to the parcel located to the east of the existing MAG campus. A conceptual development scheme has been provided for reference and indicates the general building architecture and site layout, but is not part of this application. Description The site is located on the north side of US 33 /SR 161 and has approximately 1,000 feet of frontage along Perimeter Loop Road, 700 feet along Perimeter Drive, and 700 feet on Venture Drive. The rectangular parcel includes two buildings with several automotive franchise showrooms, sales offices, service bays, and administrative office functions. Parking for 677 customer and display spaces is provided along all sides of the building. Vehicle display areas are designed as a unique finger -like arrangement along the western and southern portions of the site. The applicant has made significant changes to the previously approved development text to reflect the unique requirements of this user and the site, and to incorporate the previously approved development details. This development text establishes a new Planned Unit Development District and removes the site from the Perimeter Center PCD, allowing for more detailed and clear development regulations. Use The applicant has narrowed the list of uses from the existing Perimeter Center Subarea J text to permit the sales and services of new and used automobiles; medical, business and administrative offices; and research and development laboratories. The proposed text continues to permit a number of ancillary uses within the primary structure, which includes automobile service, sales of automobile parts and accessories, non - retail coffee shop, and automobile rental services. The proposed rezoning will permit one executive residential suite and a detached car wash that is not available for public use. Architecture The proposed development text requires "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture." The proposed building addition is intended to create a visual focal point and complement the existing building massing and high - quality architectural design. Permitted building materials include glass, metal, EIFS and stone /stone veneer. The design and height of the building addition will offer a dramatic view in the area and create a signature element for the area. Site Development Details The proposed development text clarifies and solidifies many of the existing site conditions that were originally approved as part of the development plan. The proposed text requires one parking space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, three for each service bay, and one for the executive suite. The text also permits automobile display along a maximum of 40 percent of the property's lineal street frontage. Site landscaping is required to meet Code. The text provides an exemption for property perimeter screening along SR161/US33. The text permits five different types of signs for the MAG campus: Memo re. Ordinance 07 -10 — Rezoning — MAG, Volvo Expansion February 4, 2010 Page 3 of 3 campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs, all of which are existing. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request and a final development plan (see additional plan details attached) at the January 21, 2010 meeting. After discussion regarding the excellent architectural design of the building addition and some concerns about the location and design of the car wash, the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning/preliminary development plan to City Council with eight conditions (see attached). Subsequent to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant has modified the proposed development text to address Conditions #3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and the Perimeter Center development text to delete references to the existing MAG Subarea J as per Condition #4. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 07 -10 at the second reading/public hearing on February 22, 2010. The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: DRAFT 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the MAG auto dealership campus and a building addition. This site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning and preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend City Council approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high - quality design of an existing business, and meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; 6) That the development text be modified to restrict the use of the car wash to employees only; 1y ; 91 illMMED TO COUNCIL Page 1 of 2 U - O FOR MEETING ON-21--40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN,. Land Use and JANUARY 21, 2010 Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/ TDD: 614 -410 -4600 Fax: 614-410-4747 Web Site: www,dublin.oh us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: DRAFT 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the MAG auto dealership campus and a building addition. This site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning and preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend City Council approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high - quality design of an existing business, and meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; 6) That the development text be modified to restrict the use of the car wash to employees only; 1y ; 91 illMMED TO COUNCIL Page 1 of 2 U - O FOR MEETING ON-21--40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 21, 2010 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan 7) That the development text be modified to permit internally illuminated campus identification signs (A & B) and clarified regarding administrative approval for sign faces for the brand and campus identification signs only; and 8) That the development text be modified to eliminate language allowing landscape screening to be deferred. *Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning /Preliminary Development plan was recommended to City Council for approval. MOTION #2: To approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, preliminary development plan, the applicable review criteria and existing development standards within the area with six conditions: 1) The plans be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement; 2) Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161/US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text; 3) The directional Sign S be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs: 4) The Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a brand ground sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to coordinate with the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 5) That the plan be modified to require that the landscape screening along the eastern property line be installed with the building construction; and 6) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. *Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II R-12 PLR PCD �'� _ PLR PLR % PLR PLR PLR. PLR PLR PCD PCD PLR PL LR 1 PLRI -- PLR Mercedes Drive - - PCD PCD 4 \\ 4` PCD A er meter_Lvop -Road 33 WB R-I R -1 PCD c� ;c ao c PCD Perimeter- Drive _ y °CD' - PCD PCD PCD Venture Drive R-1 I R- PCD R -I 09- 108Z/PDP /FDP N City of Dublin Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Land Use and Final Development Plan Long Range Planning MAG Volvo Feet 6335 Perimeter LOOD Rd. 0 250 500 AP r e � 1 n RRi r 1 1 ►"' r � 1'M y �• DrIV@ O s• 1 IN ! r f'E� ' ;• l � 1 �s ""r'' 1- - � • ERY' �E A i -j Venture'arrwve, . V I 7 � 1 i "Ok - � .. ■ , ter �� — �.�3f!'-- �- �"�Ey lam.''. - > ,� - - -.. - __ _ 09- 108Z/PDP /FDP N City of Dublin Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Land Use and Final Development Plan Long Range Planning MAG Volvo Feet 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. 0 250 500 r. t r• i '� �r , �• ° -, ;� {rf�. ©may r it ��� 1 ' •_ `� �� � � {� i I WO - p � RRi r 1 1 ►"' r � 1'M y �• DrIV@ O s• 1 IN ! r f'E� ' ;• l � 1 �s ""r'' 1- - � • ERY' �E A i -j Venture'arrwve, . V I 7 � 1 i "Ok - � .. ■ , ter �� — �.�3f!'-- �- �"�Ey lam.''. - > ,� - - -.. - __ _ 09- 108Z/PDP /FDP N City of Dublin Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ Land Use and Final Development Plan Long Range Planning MAG Volvo Feet 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. 0 250 500 CITY OF DUBLIN Land Use and Long Ranee Planning 5800 Stile(-Rings Rood Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone / TDD: 614 -410 -4600 Fox: 614 -410 -4747 Web S49:w '(IItbfn,ohvV February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Conditional use (Section 163.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) [� Preliminary Development Plan ! Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) ❑ Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.115) ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment ❑ Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 6325 Perimeter Loop Road Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): Parcel Sizes) (Acres): Franklin County 273-008212; Portion of 273 - 012294 Hemet Address: McLean, Virginia 22102 Existing Land Use/Development: Automobile dealership sales and service; partially undeveloped I IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use/Development: Expansion of automobile dealership sales and service Total acres affected by application: 15, (pq ± III- CURRENT PROPERTY t7WNFRf SI - Plaaea aMarh addilinnal chaoLe if nandad Name (Individual or Organization): Car Mag LLC and Car Mag Park LLC 1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 525 Hemet Address: McLean, Virginia 22102 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) FILL Daytime Telephone: (614) 889 -2571 Fax: (614) 793 -7963 RECE Email or Alternate Contact Information: NOV 2 0 2009 S SUBMITTED TO COIJhJC L WIy ur uUO L.ran _jj ,t�� or s I LAND USE & g L FOR MEETING ON ��r� LONG RANGE Zl���� `1 t� IV. APPLICANT(S) This is the person(s) who Is submitting the application if different than the property owners) listed In part III. Please complete If applicable. Executive VP , Applicant is also roe owner: yes[ Name: Tim Galli — PP _ property rtl► Y ❑ o - ❑ - Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Midwestern Auto Group Mailing Address: 6335 Perimeter Loop Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) _ Daytime Telephone: (614) 889 -2571 I Fax: (614) 793 -7963 !' �- Email or Alternate Contact Information: tgalli @magcars.com V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER This is the person(s) who Is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed In part IV or property owner listed in part III. Please complete If applicable. Name: Aaron L. Underhill, Esq. Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Smith & Hale LLC Malling Address: 37 W. Broad St., Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (614) 221 -4255 Fax: (614) 221 -4409 Email or Alternate Contact Information- aunderhill @smithandhale.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant Is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. Car Mag LLC and Car Mag Park LLC , the owner, hereby authorize the attorneys with the law firm of Smith & Hale LLC to act as my applicant or representatives) in ail matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, Including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. r Signature of Current Property Owner: .� Date: Ill -20, ❑ Check this box If the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representatives) Is attach ti as a separate document Subscribed and sworn before me this s_ day of , 2 F/1RILJ/1 State of OKI N P County of _ �trti_ Notary Public - State 0f VI NV C=Isslen b91res : 01/011201 VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by C sentatives are essential to process this application. The Owner /Applicant, as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to vislt, photograph and post a notice on the property described In this application. ti Aaron L. Underh attorney O , the owner or authorized repr kt Iue, tyrrtby - authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in thr3 application. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: Date: t Page 2 of 3 Up f Y ul- i1U BL t rt LAN[l USE & LUNG RANGE PLANNING VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. I Aaron L. Underhill, attorney the owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: � Dato:,3 l7 s IX. APPL ICANT'S AFFIDAVIT This section must be completed and notarized I Aaron L. Underhill, attorney , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained In this application, attached exhibits and other Information submitted Is complete and In all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. I Signature of applicant or authorized representative: a>u• ly G I Date: /o /W I Subscrlbod and sworn to before File title - 1 114 Clay of �' �l r 20 State of County of l `fir lin� I11�� Notary Public ,� �. NATAUE C. PATRICK Notary Pun State of Ohio My commission �I�Ires W"10 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: Application No: P8Z Date(s): 1 21 1 0 PSZAction: A rc� ve Receipt No: 1 0111 4 Map Zone: Date Received: ('_ 20_ OR Received BY: CDI4 City Council (First Reading): 02'O - 10 City Council (Second Reading): 0 .2.- 2z- )c City Council Action: Ordinance Number: Type of Request n ll + iiWtitifl Me-y cr4 Flan .,61 _Z N, E, W (Circle) Side of: ? e-x I tM0,4" axme— N, S (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: T�--` `r,• e a] Distance from Nearest Intersection: aj inki Ste,{; rl Ca Existing Zoning District: A Requested Zoning District Flub CITY DF uuaym Page 3 o 3 LANID (jSr LONG a9- ltd 74 Ix E.t(IMIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF 14.780 ACRE TRACT AT S.9. CORNER OF PERIMETER DRIVE R WILCOX ROAD, DUBLIN. OHIO FOR BRENTLINGER ENTERPRISES S(twted in the State of Ohio, Cowuy of Franklin and in the City of Dublin in Virginia Military Survey No. 2999 and being all or a ponioa of the following two (2) tracts of land conveyed to Brentlia8cr Enterprisex 14.543 aces out of a 14.550 acts tractconveyedby deed, of reteordas InsbwnentNo. 19970814007143SwW re- recordedas lns"cntNo.19971120148133; Recorder's Office. Fraeldio County, Ohio, ill of a 240 sere tract conveytd by decd nr rccord ar Famcl No. I8 -EL (fa morly Pared No. 18 AWO) (0.237 awn by rcccnt survey) as Irannaent No. 199710010107944. Rtcor&- r% Office. Franklin County, Ohio. M bounded and described u Mkmr. Doginning at a 34 -inch 1.0. Iron Ptpa oet at s point of wrvotwa at th+'QUM wW d Cho cWve corsnettfrg the asst Mo of Mscox Rvpd (80 feat wide) wfth the sWh Mw at Yarfinelar Drive (90 Feat wido), w shown trpan tisa plat of 'Pont Road. Wticox Rued. Poernoler Drive & I"asaments Dr dkstfon Pier, of rticani In Plat (look 85, Peges 51. 52 snd 53, Retrordees Office. Franln Courtly. Ohio. and as shown upon Uw psal of 'Dedication of Discovery SoularaN, Peffinefor 0rivo, Wee Street and EssarnaMe. al record it Plat Sook 72, P age 9 79 and 80. Recorder's Office, Franldtn County. Ohio: &*r4a nrnftnasiarfy Wmg saki carvsecting carve, 21WV the ourvad nWhwest lira of sr3d o0gtstrrf 14.550 acre Wad and w)e1 a curve, to the right, data of white Is: radios - 70.00 foot 1rr9 delta - 90' 00W. ■ chord dis3anoe of 42-13 foot baarLng N 4r 03' 53' E to a 3l3 -4td t .a iron pip& not at the pvint of tangarwy at the aster aril of said connecft am"' Atarlos N 97 03' Sr E Wong Lhe sotadh tine ar Perfinetar Dtiva and WON the north Ina at said otiyinal 14.550 as n trod a distatxs of 58439 filet to a V4-4)ch 1.0. IMA pip& AM at a ptrint of cOnmdjon whh the went Iine of proposed Verture Drive (60 Isot wide): Ihanee S 4S9 6e 01• E WmV aid weal Ina a dstanos of 43.91 fast to • 3144nch IA. Yon pipe set al a paint of cufv WM'- dw" sm*wal along a awed wast One of proposed V-dw Draw, do% a wend asst Ins Of Odd aoai 14AM acre find and wilt ■ (nave to the dgh% data of which tr radius - 220.00 Met and deft - 21 24' 42". a dwd d A1109 d 91.74 feat bgwjV S 11.30' Zr W to • 3144ndt I.D. kon pips eM M 11w P*fi d fir FIL Cn it RECEIVED 081 0 p /Vo f r,!�i �: n �ooq CITY Ol UU11LIR LONG RANGE USE IKBTi' "A" continued tfhenw S 22 4r W along Ita west line of proposed Venture Odve and nlgp an east line of wW original 14.550 acre tract a distance of 158.04 feet to a 314-Inch I.D. Wort pipe eat at a print of ctuvah".. Mane southerly along a portion of a roved west line of proposed Venture Drtvs, slong mwvW east line of sand original 14.550 ems tract and with a carve to the tart, data of which ice; ra&m o 330.00 feet and mubtielta = 71.33' 40', a sub -chord dle- bwm of 385.89 feet beerkhp S 13.14' 02' E to a 3144%% I.D. Iron pipe set at a cor- ner of said original 14.550 sae Uscl:. chance S 40' 69' or W radial to "M curve and along an east ire of said origt W 14.550 acs tract ■ dbtarm of 92.08 filet to a 3144nch I.D. ion pipe sat at a comes of said enigma 14,550 rase treat; themes S T 01' 4r W petmacwar to the north limited access right - d - way ire of U.S. Route 33 and ONa Route 101, parperdlcuW to a north One of a 0.561 sat h'ad of urnd conywyed as Parcel W. 18 AWL to $late of C#n10 by deed of rsca►d in Deed Book 21112, Pape 493, Rmoo -d a mca, Frarktin County, Ohio, artsl alatg an seat tins of salt or4*W 14.55[} acre tract a diz z cl 465.33 feet to a &4 -Vtch I.D. iron pope set In the north Natatlad wcess right- of-way IIrs of U.S. RmAe 33 and Ohlo Rotdo 781, In a north Fns of said 0.561 acre tract each kit Um southeast comer of slid ar;g" 14.550 acre tr*a stn said rnthod accam right- afivay pre Is mWwn upon Shea{ 12 of 14 of CNN Depwtment of TransporUdem right-of-way ptana for FRA -33- 0.34. said Iron ptpe being ID5,00 feet nartherly by perpendicular mea3ummant from the centerline of U.S. Route 33 and Ohio Routs 191; dherm N 67• S11' 11' W along the north limited aceess right-of-way Una of U.S. Rotate 33 and Ohio Route 161, along a ponton of a north One of sold 0.561 scre Ind, along a south Ilne of said original 14.550 acre tract and along a south line of HWd 0.237 eery Intct it rgatance of 602.55 feet to a 3144nch I.D. ion pipe set at an anpla poet in tfte north krniued *cease right- of -wsy nne of U.S. Route 33 and OWo Route 167, st the mwihwtat eomot of maid 0.581 son tract and at a comer of saki 0.237 acts trod {pstslrg a poW of a south�mt cornmr of said orlglnol 14.550 acre trod " the soLeftaA con-Ar of said 1237 acre V at 495.00 feet), dwnee N 56' 114'47 W along a north ILnited seem right-of-way fine of U.S. Rot" 33 rod Ohl* Route 151 and along a south line of said 0,237 acre tract a distance of 24.72 feet to ■ W44nch I.D. Won pipe set at an ale pofrd in the north IWnited socaas right ofrwry fine of U.S. Route 33 mrd Ohio Route 161 and at a tourer of said 0 .237 more h Irmwe N Wr 58' 1V W along the north.imltad aoosss eght -d- wW Ors of U.S, Rout* 33 wd 011to Rolle 161 and along a south Ilea of said 0.237 rase bmet m dlattrroe of 30.11 feet to a 314 I.D. iron pipe set In the cantwortar of Wilcox Rood and at fin souttwrest earner of Bald 0.237 we tract, said Won plpt Wing 1111.00 feel r"VWty by pwpendk;dar measurement from @n cemedlne of U.S. Rods 33 and Ohio Routs 191; EXHI9I1' "A" continued thence N 2' 58' 0 W song the CWerflne of Wilco Rood WA Wong the want line of uld 0.237 acre trot a dtstanoe of 12247 foot to a P.K. Nall net at the rto Owmt Comer of saki 0.237 am tract and of the southwest comer of ftie east one -halt of dedicated Wtkox Road; thence S 87. 58' 11' E along a north Are of said 0237 acre tract and along bw south end of said dedicated portion cf Wilcox Road a distance of 30.11 feet to a 314. Inch I.D. Iron pipe set at a comer of said 0,237 acre tract, at a southwest corner of said original 14.550 acre kart and at the southeast comer of said dedicated portion of Wicox Road; therms N 2.56' or W along the past fine of Wilcox Road and along a west line of saki original 14.550 acre tract a dlttanee of 852.27 feet to the place of beginning; containing 14.760 own of land more or less and befog subject to ail sasamente and " restrtalons of r000rd. The above descriptkxt was prepared by Ted L Robinson, Ohio Surveyor No, 5381, of C.F. Bird 6 P.J. BuIL Inc.. Consulting Englneem 8 Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, hom an actual field survey Wofmed under hie, su n tsion In July, 1997. Basle of. bearings is Uw east line of VYita�c Road, bslnp N 2- S6' or w, as shorn of feo7rd in Plat Book 85, Pages 61.32 and 53, Recordefs Office, Frw 4dh County, Ohio. 1T h , 0"a pooh Ted L Robin wn VM1tbd Otto Surveyor i53E1 Qe4n RW, P.E., R8' Frar+ta n County ow V b e• N 0A h CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. q 5.099 AC. N INSr. 200906170087819 J <c P.N. 273--012294 2 4k � y SCALE.- t* - 80' 0 so 160 240 GRAPHIC SCALE S $976'34" E 57.46' U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 (VARIABLE WIDTH) FRA. 33- 0.34 EXHIBIT FOR A 0.913 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING ALONG VENTURE DRIVE, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO f °p 0. 2999) r KEVIN NO BER 20, 2009 SCALE. f" = 80 1 C.F. Bird do R.J. !!, 1.769? o // (I ♦✓ 2875 W Dublin —G evil ? e. E_ B Columbus, Ohio 4J29g r1, Kevin L. Baxter Ohio Surveyor No. 7697 tiEkh16Its EXP_ZONING.dwg Me baste of bearings was transferred from a CPS survey of FrankAn County Monuments N7 -94 and N8 -94 performed by the Fronkiin Cewnty Engineers Office In 1995, and is based on the NAD83, Ohio PLACE OF BEGAN. State Plane Ccorditte Systems, South Zone (x986 FOR A 0.913 AG Adj) and determines the centerline of Venture Drive REZONING ]RAC7 as baling S 89' 16' 34" f $ ( r ---- VENTURE DR. N 60 R = 330.00' 0.913 AC. d = 824'51 " L = 48.46' Ch = 48.42' S 5431'42" E 0 h CAR MAG PARK L.L.C. q 5.099 AC. N INSr. 200906170087819 J <c P.N. 273--012294 2 4k � y SCALE.- t* - 80' 0 so 160 240 GRAPHIC SCALE S $976'34" E 57.46' U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 (VARIABLE WIDTH) FRA. 33- 0.34 EXHIBIT FOR A 0.913 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING ALONG VENTURE DRIVE, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO f °p 0. 2999) r KEVIN NO BER 20, 2009 SCALE. f" = 80 1 C.F. Bird do R.J. !!, 1.769? o // (I ♦✓ 2875 W Dublin —G evil ? e. E_ B Columbus, Ohio 4J29g r1, Kevin L. Baxter Ohio Surveyor No. 7697 tiEkh16Its EXP_ZONING.dwg November 20, 2009 DESCRIPTION OF A 0.913 ACRE TRACT FOR REZONING ALONG VENTURE DRIVE, SOUTH OF PERIMETER DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey No. 2999 and being a portion of a 5.099 acre tract of land conveyed to Car MAG Park L.L..C., by deed of record in Instrument 200906170087819, all references to Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point in the curved southwesterly right -of -way line of Venture Drive (60 feet in width) as shown upon the plat entitled "Dedication Of Venture Drive, Easements and Vacation of Existing Sanitary Sewer Easements" of record in Plat Book 89, Pages 43, 44 and 45, at the northwesterly comer of said 5.099 acre tract and at an easterly comer of a 14.780 acre tract of land conveyed to Car MAG L.L.C., by deed of record in Instrument 200205010109358; thence southeasterly along the curved southwesterly right -of -way line of Venture Drive, along the curved northeasterly line of said 5.099 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 330.00 feet, and delta = 08° 24' 51 ", are length = 48.46 feet, a chord distance of 48.42 feet a bearing of S 54° 31' 42" E to a point; thence S 05° 15' 52" W crossing said 5.099 acre tract a distance of 512.41 feet to a point in the south line of said 5.099 acre tract and in the north Limited Access right -of -way line of U.S. Route 33 & State Route 161 — FRA. 33 -0.34 (variable width); thence N 89° 16' 34" W along the north Limited Access right -of -way line of U.S. Route 33 & State Route 161 and along a portion of the south line of said 5.099 acre tract a distance of 57.48 feet to a point at the southwest comer of said 5.099 acre tract and at the southeast comer of said 14.780 acre tract; thence N 00° 43' 26" E along the west line of said 5.099 acre tract and along an east line of said 14.780 acre tract a distance of 180.31 feet to a point at a comer of said 5.099 acre tract and at a corner of said 14.780 acre tract; thence N 39° 40' 44" E along the northwest line of said 5.099 acre tract and along the southeast line of said 14.780 acre tract a distance of 92.67 feet to the place of beginning; containing 0.913 acres of land more or less and being subject to all easements and restrictions of record. The above description was prepared by Kevin L. Baxter, Ohio Surveyor No. 7697, of C.F. Bird & R.J. Bull, Inc., Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, from best available Court House record in October, 2009. Basis of bearings was transferred from a GPS Survey of Franklin County Monuments N7 -94 and N8 -94 performed by the Franklin County Engineer's Office in 1995, and is based on the NAD83, Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone (1986 Adj.) and determines the centerline of Venture Drive as being S 89° 16' 34" E. An exhibit of this description is attached hereto and made.Apart-thereof. Kevin L. Baxter Ohio Surveyor #7697 Page I of 1 09- 0951Exp_Zoning MIDWE AUTO GROUP PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION STATEMENT 6325 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD III. Development Plan Statement A. Please briefly explain the proposed development: The proposed development consists of an existing automobile sales and service facility operated by Midwestern Auto Group (MAG). Recently, MAG purchased the Volvo automobile dealership that is currently found in Linworth off of Dublin - Granville Road. It now desires to bring the Volvo dealership to its existing dealership in Dublin in order to consolidate its operations and continue its tradition of serving this market with sales and service of upscale, luxury vehicles. The zoning text that is applicable to this site at the time of the filing of this application requires a rezoning of the dealership property in order to alter the previously approved site plan. All of the existing dealership is found within the boundaries of Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD. This property is included in this application, while a small portion of undeveloped land (0.94: acres) is also included and is found within Subarea D of the Perimeter Center PUD. This application calls for the expansion of the eastern side of the dealership to provide for sales and service of the Volvo automobile line. This expansion also will accommodate new office space for the dealership's existing and relocated administrative staff, as well as an owner's office and residential suite which is expected to be used on a part-time basis to accommodate the dealership's owner, who lives out -of- state. High - quality architecture and landscaping will form the basis of an upgraded site plan. The goal is for MAG's Volvo dealership to be operational from this site in early 2011, if not sooner. This timeline is being driven by the expiration of MAG's lease for Volvo at its Linworth site, which expires at the end of 2010. In addition to this application, a separate rezoning application will be filed by this applicant in the coming months that will request approval of a preliminary development plan for a BMW dealership to be located immediately to the east of this PUD to complete the MAG dealership campus. MAG plans to develop, construct, and begin operations from the new BMW facility between late 2011 and mid -2012. Therefore, the Volvo site plan is being proposed with an eye toward further development occurring next door soon thereafter. B. Briefly state how the proposed development relates to the existing and future land use character of the vicinity: This application continues the use of a permitted automobile sales and service facility. Other dealerships are also found in the area along U.S. Route 33 and State Route 161. Therefore, the use fits in with the existing nature of the area. It also conforms to the future character of the area, which generally can be expected to include commercial I ip ;r V Q along the freeway and in the Avery Road corridor. = a -- 0 9 - 11 ! 1" &P/ , 3 ;0 AND USE & t.Gl�l� NGE PlANN1N C. Briefly state how the proposed development will relate to the Dublin Community Plan and any other applicable standards /resolutions such as Conservation Design and the Residential Appearance Standards: The use of the site is not changing with this application. However, the Community Plan designates this area as "General Commercial." The uses that are present in such a district include retail uses such as automobile sales and service. D. Briefly explain how the proposed rezoning and development meet the review criteria for Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission as stated in Section 153.055(B). The proposed site plan as filed complies in most respects with the currently approved PUD text that is applicable to the site. The updated zoning text in the new PUD adds a small amount of acreage to accommodate the Volvo expansion. Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent properties by preserving existing curbcuts. Since there is an existing facility on the site, all relevant and necessary public utilities and services are available for this site. New architecture and landscaping reflect brand imaging within the context of Dublin. MAG Dublin Ex. Dealership PUD pdp -fdp statement.doc (alu) (11/20/09) OWNERS APPLICANT ATTORNEYS Capital Automotive REIT Attn: Portfolio Management 8270 Greensboro Drive Mclean, VA 22102 Midwestern Auto Group Attn: Tim Galli 6335 Perimeter Loop Drive Dublin, OH 43017 Ben W. Hale, Jr. Aaron L. Underhill 37 W. Broad St., Suite 725 Columbus, OH 43215 Car Mag Park LLC 8270 Greensboro Dr. #950 McLean, VA 22102 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNFRC AHF Management Corp. 5920 Venture Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 Consolidated Biomedical Laboratories, Inc.. P.O. Box 2230 Burlington, NC 27216 Discovery MC Investments LLC 7007 Discovery Blvd. Dublin, OH 43017 :Hawkins Family Partnership Ltd. c/o Dwayne Hawkins 6001 34` St. N. St. Petersburg, FL 33714 Ohio Central Credit Union 6033 Perimeter Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 Waldron Investments LLC 6042 Quin Abbey Ct. E. Dublin, OH 43017 Fleda Anderson & Neville Reay 6602 Heatherston Loop Dublin, OH 43017 Paulo & Marilena Cugini 155 Green Meadows Dr. S Westerville, OH 43081 EMC Dublin LLC 150 N. Wacher Dr., Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60606 Ivan Mounts 10775 Fitzgerald Outlet Mount Sterling, OH 43143 Sherrie Ridenour 6051 Perimeter Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 BOR Associates LLC 5850 Venture Dr. -A Dublin, OH 43017 DBD 6000 Venture LLC 6000 Venture Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 Gerald Ferguson 6601 Heatherstone Circle Dublin, OH 43017 MSKB LLC 5970 Venture Dr. Dublin, OH 43017 Venture Drive Partners 11 LP 5920 Venture Dr., Suite 200 Dublin, OH 43017 mag- dublin.lbl (ssg) 11/3/09 F:Docs /s &h1abe1s /2009 Midwestern Auto Group 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Dublin, Ohio VOLVO ADDITION RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2010 CITY OF DUBLIN FANG RANGE USE S SUBMITTED TO UDUh��}QL MEETING O �?' CIVIL ENGINEER BIRD & BULL ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 2875 W. Dublin- Granville Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 t + 614 761 1661 f +6' 4 761 1661 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN -IT STUDIOS, LLC 1589 Newcomer Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 1 + 614 505 1270 I +6 1 4 340 4624 MECHANICAL ENGINEER MCMULLEN ENGINEERING CO., INC. 100 South State Street Westerville, Ohio 43081 t + 614 895 9408 f + 614 895 9450 D,a.- P,­umber A08 -080 ■ zwm o PmM�Awry o ea sa p PernM Sb o co�aw�uoa A A A A A Drawing Sei Combined Preliminary & Final Development Plan sas 155 NORTH FlFTH STREET I COLUMBUS OHIO 49215 P. 514.489.7500 �� F. 0 1 www.ardldl.00m Gz1W CMEC Il lJlll AL AL ::::: IBM ® .... -- Ems .... . ®' Ill -..: .....■ .. _ ■. ■... RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2010 CITY OF DUBLIN FANG RANGE USE S SUBMITTED TO UDUh��}QL MEETING O �?' CIVIL ENGINEER BIRD & BULL ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 2875 W. Dublin- Granville Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 t + 614 761 1661 f +6' 4 761 1661 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAN -IT STUDIOS, LLC 1589 Newcomer Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 1 + 614 505 1270 I +6 1 4 340 4624 MECHANICAL ENGINEER MCMULLEN ENGINEERING CO., INC. 100 South State Street Westerville, Ohio 43081 t + 614 895 9408 f + 614 895 9450 D,a.- P,­umber A08 -080 ■ zwm o PmM�Awry o ea sa p PernM Sb o co�aw�uoa A A A A A Drawing Sei Combined Preliminary & Final Development Plan sas 155 NORTH FlFTH STREET I COLUMBUS OHIO 49215 P. 514.489.7500 �� F. 0 1 www.ardldl.00m Gz1W CMEC Il lJlll AL AL 1 � r !. Bl CUSTOPFER } DlBPLAY. PA)aC1NG. PARKING S-4 1335 SF. 6V . Wsl f PARIfNG 1 CUSTOMER xa } 136 DISPLAY PA WJ-*,, f t. L _ GOLUMa45- M!ARY6` /IEEE RD — BUILDING A SHOWROOM7S /OFFICES /C, USE GROUPS 6 -1 4 B TYPE 2B 23,136 OF FOOTPRINT 163 LF FRONTAGE 1,133 LF PERIMETER LNSPRMKLERFD SITE CODED NOTES IQ EXISTMG U46TE OIL TANK (WHITE). PAMT BUSINESS TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL (GREY) AND SERVICE BAYS DISPLAY AREA PROVIDE LANDSCAPE SCREENNG - SEE TOTAL- 526!160 SPACES LP -I O MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION FOR ISUSRESS EXISTMG AND PROPOSED ADDITION. EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED BY BUILDING- PARAPETS O NO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR ROOF OF CARLL4BH Q FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD (FAAR) EXISTNG PAVEMENT 15 FEAVY DUTY FOR SEMI TRUCK DELIVERY TO FACILITY DOCK— REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS Q AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAR (AERIAL FAAR). FEFER TO CIVIL DRAWNSS FOR PAVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIRED DISTANCE FROM BUILDWC LANDROVER BLDG- 1,335 SF. MAN MAG, BLDG 66,595 SF, VOLVO ADDITIOP6 46,034 SF. TOICI= 749'D cF. LANDROVER BLDG BUSU.E55 3315/300.IL25 . Q SERVICE BA7B 3960/100.40 -1-3-21 DISPLAY AREA 41161/1¢ . 4116 . 4 TOTAL, 94/75 SPACES MAN MAG BLDG BUSINESS 30540/300.102 SERVICE BAYS DISPLAY AREA 36045/100.380 - 36.3.114 43.%34A0M . 44 TOTAL- 526!160 SPACES snre Pum,SITE PLAN VOLVO ADDITION ISUSRESS 21926/300.13 TOTAL: 256/109 SPACES GV..;.LtLw MEMO $EQf vE 2 TOTAL. S 9 HANDICAPPED SPACES ON SITE ,gR�,CITECTURA,L SITE P A LAN NOTE- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN INCLUDED FOR GENERAL ICE ONLY -REFER TO CIVIL DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL SITE LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS- REFER TO LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS FOR ACTUAL PLANTNG LOCATIONS AND SPECIES BUILDING B SHOWROOMS /OFFICES/CAR DROP -OFFS AOMN ISTRATION/RESI DENCE/SERV ICE USE GROUPS S -I 4 B 4 R2 TYPE 25 55061 OF FOOTPRNT B92 LF FRONTAGE 1244 LF PERIMETER can CUSTOMER PARKING 43 DISPLAY PAWNG 213 INVENTORY PARKNG 134 EMPLOYEE PARKNG IBl SERVICE PAWING 31 TOTAL PARKNG SPACES PROVIDED. 611 SPACES TOTAL SITE . 684022 SF_ REQUIRED GREEN SPACE (MN. 30% OF SITE) . 205306 SF. ACTUAL GREEN SPACE . 256590 SF. (36% OF TOTAL SITE) TOTAL BUILDMG COVERAGE . 124,91D OF 65% OF TOTAL SITE) W CL o � 00 0 O NY / ? O J Q Z O Ljj tV a W ^' m 6N ■ zo�.�y D P,. , O Pa .i DP mss Pri6lwrs +Q A A A A BUILDING SEPARATION un a A08 -080 ARCHITECTURAL snre Pum,SITE PLAN BUILDING SEPARATION un CL D O oc C7 3� 00 9 J Z 0C E H \ a N m W rn t L� 1� ,4 1 ■ — ;g trios o P,.7 o ea sa O Pem - O Can— A A! A A !a G e FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1116" II r 16 I TOTAL 18,353 SALT noe.aao F3RST FIAN7 F; PLAN 3.01 j�- F O J O CL D O oc O� o J Q � Z v w v � a N M Ln w rn 0 o� ■ zo�ny 13 r +wv D eu s:i El o Revhbm A ®_ A A A_ SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE I/I d" = 1.0 Id I TOTAL: 17,607 SOFT A48.980 sFcOND FLOOR PLAN '.02 J 1 f ran -�--- :_, - -_,_ - f � I I� so wr• / nIcl / — I ! I rbn / l 1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN T TOTAL TOTAL 2.111 SOFT E MPIRE=: CL I O C7 00 J Z LU w Ul w orb 0 a ae 0 a 0 J w a CA. m m ■mry 12 aloe O ww�twy o au sa 13 Re nrsw 13 rwrm�mni RmbbA 0 _ 0 _ L] _ . _ TI IIHfl i 10 p Ah1S I I I / I I 1 I ran -�--- :_, - -_,_ - f � I I� so wr• / nIcl / — I ! I rbn / l 1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN T TOTAL TOTAL 2.111 SOFT E MPIRE=: CL I O C7 00 J Z LU w Ul w orb 0 a ae 0 a 0 J w a CA. m m ■mry 12 aloe O ww�twy o au sa 13 Re nrsw 13 rwrm�mni RmbbA 0 _ 0 _ L] _ . _ TI IIHfl i 10 p Ah1S THIRD FLOOR PLAN T TOTAL TOTAL 2.111 SOFT E MPIRE=: CL I O C7 00 J Z LU w Ul w orb 0 a ae 0 a 0 J w a CA. m m ■mry 12 aloe O ww�twy o au sa 13 Re nrsw 13 rwrm�mni RmbbA 0 _ 0 _ L] _ . _ TI IIHfl i 10 p Ah1S J 1 I 1 1 I l J I � i LON Cal IltUtl _ NW r r r r L(�YRTH FLOOR PLAN 1 „ MW�Mmm ci D t/ 0 0 J z O a: Lu \ jam i� w rb... 0 a L Q! C o rvr •s �•r,m p n+s.0 y a_ A_ a_ A_ A_ A_ A— A �o A6F.Q89 FOURTH FLOOR PLANS 3,04 O J ` 0 O l7 0 Oa J W CL Z E .L W y CL N W m Ln 1 fD Mm T"I D vr:ry o ads+ D ps +sw Q c� rs.r�.crs L] _ BUILDING U ELEVATION S Ao� -UO 4.00 CL D O 00 " t- 0 L W J Z O LU OC � CL N LU M M �O L I „. J � ,r a..r� O P".. y O Bb SN O ar.asw O —eoo A— A - 4.01 BUI - K, n •yq By �Ve¢Ca51 aA�pf e/ y e v r/ BUI ELEVATION = " I f • !,ry f Cf4 R'Gn ''� -•nx f DL SIVII 0.t+% YId �• 1FrN .a1G1 If fi w+. nau m+nt�r xa R�4 ref 1tla aaU f.�C V/ f — BUILD _ _ELEVATION S u Ill d = w I ke rH/.w T' tp.wt -� wm r+f..,o cmmf uGihU •e BUILDING ELEVATION Ct �Y�IJ Gb � n L -�s9 feu aWf +1�4 n /QY ?W'r >tf C�f tH+ w1p f I— <5) C=Y F'LA 4 t -e NOT =: ALL EXTERIOR MA E21ALS POR AooiTON ARE TO MATCH EXIS':NG. W NEW MA. uSEO PCP FACIGTy EXPANSION l CL O C7 0 0 \ ? o J Q v Z E O L H Lu wa+rZs ■ I- 0 — 0L o - tl e A08 -080 111 s�� rRp t l p � A. ELEVATIONS `' 4.02 X R a' f�sFLOOR PLAN COF'NG MATCH EXTG V ,0, STUCCO TO MATCH EXTa COLOR: NATURAL GRAY NETAL 5TOREF2CNT BY KAW`EER OR EOIL )AL - CLEAR ANOPZEO W/ 6RAY TNT "Gi_A55 l i - Aut*W METAL Cdpvc. WC-4 EXTG. STUCCO TO MATCH EXTG METAL STOREFRONT BY KAWNEER OR EQUAL - CLEAR ANODIZED W/ GRAY 5T'JCCO TO MATCH EXTG COLOR: NATURAL GRAY COLOR: NATURAL GRAY ALUMWJN METAL- - U 1 EARA ET HGT (110 -G ") COPING. MATCH EXTG, t� *7 r - - - STUCCO TO MATCH EXTG 1� COLOR: NATUR G Y _ TYPE 4 CMU FACE COLO - (YPk 4 � nANYE� H1 MAT TYPE 4 CMU SMOOTH FADE C 006p ,St74 TYPE 3 CMIrATC9 FACE COLOR: DARK GREY (dOT. THREE COURSES) FACE COLOR: SILVER MATCH EXTG. FACE COLOR: D (BOT. THRE E ` - �-.v �i: MATCH exrr.. r U - ._ - `= i MA t _ —. l _� ` PANYE9 TYPE 3 CMU SMOOTH FANT6U Vi'i pMtTE(1 fAOM OVERF¢AO DOOR OVER.EAD 0t:G2 FACE COLOR: DARK GREY (BOY. THREE COURSES) MATCH EXTG. ELEVATION � L'J ELEVATION CL D 0 �b o� �� o J Q ai Z O 0C E W y u N Ln > W m > 10 9.. � iz:»re oI o ed s. o vmm� sr o co�orm:M A O D A 8 AOB -000 vex r� _ CARWASH aa BUILDING Y� SIx�MUM»r " 4.03 ` ALL"Ni-i , 5 TYPE 3 - J'U SMOOTH > TYPE 4 CMU 5MOOTFI AND GJTTER FACE COLOR: DARK GREY FACE COLOR: SILVER (BOT. THREE COURSES) MATCH EXTG. 0 ELEVATION MATCH EXTG. ALLVkA,l METAL LOPING. MATCH EXTG. METAL STOREFRONT BY KAWNEER OR EQUAL - CLEAR ANODIZED W/ GRAY 5T'JCCO TO MATCH EXTG COLOR: NATURAL GRAY TNT CLASS J C. 1� L PANTER ti � nANYE� H1 TYPE 3 CMIJ SMOOTH TYPE 4 CMU SMOOTH 006p ,St74 FACE COLOR: DARK GREY (dOT. THREE COURSES) FACE COLOR: SILVER MATCH EXTG. ELEVATION MATCH exrr.. CL D 0 �b o� �� o J Q ai Z O 0C E W y u N Ln > W m > 10 9.. � iz:»re oI o ed s. o vmm� sr o co�orm:M A O D A 8 AOB -000 vex r� _ CARWASH aa BUILDING Y� SIx�MUM»r " 4.03 ` ALL"Ni-i , 5 TYPE 3 - J'U SMOOTH > TYPE 4 CMU 5MOOTFI AND GJTTER FACE COLOR: DARK GREY FACE COLOR: SILVER (BOT. THREE COURSES) MATCH EXTG. 0 ELEVATION MATCH EXTG. � VIEW I VIEW 2 VIEW 3 VIEW 4 VIEW 5 NOTE: - THE FOLLOWING IMAGES ARE KEYFRAMES FROM AN ANIMATION. V. . i � 1• s 4 ,k } I f f r I 1 4 JEWWWO 11 D 0 0 00° �o J J Z E O \ a N m W r „ i a� oP � o ea sn O , o �w�m A . A A A A A A A A A Jilt . F 4 .04 „----- - - - - -- - - -- -_._.. - - - - -__ -- ......_-- - - - - `--- - ----- a------- ----- - - -_.8 ------- L ----------- --'-'/ PERIMETER LOOP ROAD (P.B 72, FGS 47 R 48) WILCOX ROAD - 60' (P.B. 85, POs 51, 52 & 53) C. -- - - - - -- _-------- - - - - -- - - - - -_ °_- - -- -__- -- - -- ^ ^s — .. - ----- -� - - -- r� — __ - ---- -- 4.a CYpla) rYea vrplai ►rra , / - - -- P n� V"4att drama -_ -- VIdPk4 Ar --- - - - - °- - P 1 / • _ •'aa — �� °"�.` ec +� a ^ N- 6'I' � r1°y Ft+� �; �� I t •' 'Cr�S '/ -'4' � .� aa � y- er � °° � p w y lls Q I y�,`a� 1 � \ `Y ” t ; r� 1 1 1 T - �. - -�.._ - - - K _ ®_ 760e► = ;.�. ry`' ` ` y f• `` Ki.� i ' ! - ,,, T . ,:1 ; , 1 , t i i l _ 1- Il - �r•_LJ»�S L1 r F� .."" 5wae ,p ` w •`. �. p `• \ \ ., ` i ! �� �!'; . + � . �i � r ' ° ^a rr t , y } _�,�y = ,1 � '_ - 1 ` �al.t 3�/ � ;' � +. ` , •�J IQ ;� ``' �' • I It 1 ..,,`,,__` 'rI 1 1 ` lleorr `• ` r° •� y ILti %'� >� �DII�./I�°!7'MP 'y *, I !!��'v i r . ! Ff •+ `� 1 1 4 '1 !jI',�.'>+� -.. � v [T� ♦` ` �,'`� � 1 /- 66' ( I t ' rr t� `Sd °! !' '>> 1, IY! 'ti �__r.�.� -� ( I , • e VJ • ` �JE1D�lt , `'� ` .(` `% �{r f Z�y � ^� tt � � • � 1 jr7 �` +` MlA1�, `� r ;` f� � I • ! r . " ` }r a f 1x. .t f.. ! - I \y 1UDa! r - 1 i i Z7 I �� \, !f • Sl �� , ; I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 r I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 ( I I ;; I 1; 1 1agM `� ` fy� I I { 1 1• . r 1 r r r r r r r . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r I ro• p 5P%°► 13 � e-n ., r r NwV •� / ' /� �1 '` i i i i i� i j �` - I � r � :rs�r� ' ,� I P ^ ^p 1 y r ` �/- N ' I � 4_ yr ' y rlr r r 3d yr r �I �DMI I — IT I I I I I w il ro MIN _.l - 1 ' t tt 1, r I �' o NIIN , Y'r ~ `�'� 1 14960 ro r I MIN I 1 r i iIVUw f L. ' S� f ' r r r ,rS3 1 ' T* 1 1 S176? lLJ( �'\ , b , 1 ' 1 `, IN = fiSG1rr _ NuA! acu +- ; , n I ` t � 1 fwrN �� 5rrthg MAb Flty f� r te] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 ^ 7 1 1 •/ aO,aC1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �� • t 1 W a. td 00 � O 1 J < E 0 LLI v \ V) Ln N Ln L M L M t ) YJPaF • e i 1 1 i 1 { t t - r� ^ ~ h� 27W 0 ` { ' 1 bl 1 iC 1 1 1 1 1 i I I 1 I fvuN 1 I r M' NIrN o ©i , i � # i x It 1 j i 1 i i ' NUA) ./- i'J�eRewr FocllHy �,1 J. V 1, _ o 10 � Leo./y�l �� �l1oREw , 1 , 4 Mw JI KIWI �r E r. morr5 Ml I& Ndkaked M thY plcn ttase boon Fuld kientRUd ror gaprox1frate location. Dlr to gowlh ekwe ork¢lal ptatting N1rvb qquass tllltee filyGM pn WF pre, or appraxtnaSe are Ina) rot represent the actual IunWr of plants that ac4nlly exret. rlalb specie• shvxl an n,4 plait err [al>•ytens rlrth plovt 14pecles apprevrd by the city of Dgblh on 09/I°^/I-Ma, ad the plat on rile at tlr Glty aF vk&l5 dated Moth 24,14" - &Item 140- 06 C _ II -- - _ iL, , MINty MW x,o.r MIN ! • '` B Sit Data (Calculations include the proposed Volvo addition) Tree Replacement - No Information Available to Document. Tree Planting: Display Area: Wwt+•d I Tr•• w 5.rm U ad W0.4 cmroo• ,20.3%,f of Building Coverage and VUA / 5000 at = B4 Trees Allowed: Currently there Is 2,737 LF of street frontage. Exislkg: Currently there are 127 peas on site that not considered street trees or parking Island trees 2,737 If • .25 = 6841f of display space Is allowed• There Is —rently 1 Tree per each Parking IsWM Exls8ng:1.079 Ild display space (395 If more than isalbwad) Additional Site Landscaping Requirement Required: B,,k,e Commonly Use; Landscape areas equal l0 2 k of the building Interior Landscaping for Vehicular Use Areas: gm m ceverage area. B,Mding 51= 91,810,F'2% = 1,836 at of landscape areas Landscape Area: Required: 5 sf of IarMscapa area Par 100 sl of vehbular use area Existing: The existing plan meets this requirement, 328,566 sf of vehkular use area / 100 sf • 5 sf = 16,429 sl Existing: 16, 092sfo flnledorlandscapingl337sfshorl) Street Tree and Public Tree Requirement Exisgng: Curmnlly there are 46 Street Trees located around the existing property grawy� ' I I ■-p It 120 IN O rrN�M,w,y 1 1 O aid sa I 1 � r.m• sa Y , S 0 ' I � l 0 1 I Q it t I 1 I I I I l r � 1 arl.pm,.e n r cr. M r,., a. arin •1 t0,trra p141x4g.ws ------- ------- ; rroi� rrum 090 -028 srrxb OVERALL '! LANDSCAPE PLAN x ,xxx SCALE 1•. OP - o W w II I r.0iy� . jr \'U✓ f r * r: rG � ,e Exlsting Mounding - to, rn Rm 101 to be malnoaled I� 4&-JS 9-6r Q I,Iq l.a 0 Cp 73 7 O r I r � r r r r f � F^•t I " r I r I J f e '_'xx..�� �♦ sod 35001 M!N q sso.r NVAJ q -PN Exlsting evsrgeero trees (Z7 total) shorai on- the 7roe FYeservaElon Plan to be transplanted to the locatlan. Spacing to match evergesna uxrently located on Ventura DrNe. Prlor to trap plantn g mounding to match existing along Venture C lv. to be constructed. y 1 t L t 1 r i f k 1, d♦ CT 39-,13 V R, , r I Hf r i r I i r f� " rr; " am p / r , ,r r � " J q. ry, r , � /I �I \ l L N 00,2 a > � J Q a IL O Z v w LU �] Q W e" s� L OF A, ANDREW 1� i ENGLISH w.,�xps ■ za;� a n3,oe O E3 Bu E3 Pnti 8a a Canmuclbn Reeau 0 � d A PVJ+ -rt 9MKK. LLC Crtmbu,.ON 13336 l +�,3:o me.. �3e�e3e 080.028 �i LANDSCAPE PLAN LP - 1 r , I . 7 ( 1 1 CAR MAG L.L.C. 14.780 AC. INS 273 50082112350 6Q?(n �Y I 1 I. � a a 11501 cl 15 X T 5 6 � Ib 20 21� — 22 24 I 25 28 29 31 32 33 54 3'7 58 41 42 49 46 I f i =48 49 ? 51 3 '52 c�- � r 54 t 56 i I I SCALE 1 g I 1 f f 30 I I 1 r 35 a 3 a 5�fr�1 sa 50 r 61 b2 a a a � r' l No Notes The owner shall be responsible for the construction, erection, and maintenance of temporary fencing around tree preservation areas so that all protected trees shall be preserved. The fencing shall be located a distance from the trunk that equals, at a minimum, the distance of the critical root zone or 15 feet whichever is greater. Call the City of Dublin Landscape Inspector at 410 -4600 for tree fencing inspection. Fencing shall remain In place and be secured In an upright position during the entireconstruction period to prevent the impingement of construction vehicles, materials, spoils, and equipment into or upon the tree preservation area. Tree preservation signs must be located along the fencing, Any change in the protective fencing must be approved by the Planning Director. The approved tree preservation plan shall be available on the building site before work commences and at all times during construction of the project. The owner shall be responsible or notifying all contractors and utilities. During all phases of of construction, all steps to prevent the destruction or damage toprotected trees shall be taken. No construction activity, movement and /or placement ofequipment, vehicles, materials, or spoils storage shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. No excess soil, additional fill, liquids, of construction debris shall be placed within the critical roots zone of any tree that is to be preserved. No attachments, including but not limited to ropes, nails, advertising posters, signs, fencesor wires (other than those used for bracing, guying or wrapping) shall be attached to any trees. No gaseous liquids or solids substances which are harmful to trees shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. No fire or heat shall be permitted within the tree preservation area. All utilities, including service lines, shall be installed in accordance with the tree preservation plan. Legend -�. Existing Tree For Removal or Transplanting Exlsling Tree to Remain Existing Tree to Remain Tree Proleclien Fencing Tree Inventory List Mid leelem Auto Group - Voho Expansion .12' 171179 Tree 4 DSH (Inches) Type Condition Remarks 1 65 Maple Good Tree to Remain 6 5 Maple Good Tree to Remam 3 7 Maple Good Tree to be Removed -To be Replaced 4 3 75 Oak Good Tree to be Removed - No replacement Value 5 35 Oak Good Thee to be Removed -No replacement Value b 375 Oak Good Tree to be Ramo d -No replacement Value 7 7 Maple Goad Tree to be Removed - To be Replaced I I Maple Good Tree m be Removed -To be Replaced i7 3 Maple Good Tree to be Remo.ed -NO replacement Value 10 4 75 Maple Good Tree to Remain 11 e 5 Maple Cod Tree to Remain 12 2 75 Spruce Good Tree to be R_—d -NO replacemem Value 13 275 Spruce Good Tree to Remo.ed -NO replacement Value 14 275 Spruce Good Tree to be Remoted -No replacement Value 15 2 75 Spmce Good Tree to be Rm—cl -No replacemanl Value 11 7 Cherry Good Tree to be Removed -To be Replaced 11 4 Cherry Good Tree to be Remod - No replacement Value 18 Tme has been remod 19 45 Maple Good Tree to be Remod -No replacement Value 20 3 5 Oak Good Tree to be Removed -No replacement Value 2 1 4.25 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 22 4 Spruce Good To Be Transp /anted - See Planting Plan 23 4.5 Spruce Good To Be Trans planned -See Planting Plan 24 4.15 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 25 4 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See planting Plan 26 55 Locust Good Tree to be Remod -No replacement Value 27 55 Locust Goad Tree to be Remodd -No replacement Value 28 4 Spruce Good To Be Tranaplanted - Sea Planting Plan 29 4 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 30 4 5 Cherry Good Tree to be R—d! -No replacement Value 1 31 4 25 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted -See Planting Plan 32 425 Spruce Good To Be Traniplanh M -See Planting Plan 33 4 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 34 4.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted. See Planting Plan 35 45 Cherry Good Tree to be Removed -No replacement Value 30 4 Cherry Good Tree to be Removed -No replacement Value 31 4.5 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting flan 38 4 25 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting flan 39 3 Locust Good Tree to be Remod -No replacement Value 40 3 25 Locust Good Thee to be Removed - No replacement Value 41 4.25 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 41 4 Spruce Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 43 425 Oak Good Tree to be Remod -No replacement Value 1 44 3 Pine Good To Be Transplanted -See Planting Plan 45 2.75 Pine Good To Be Transplanted - Sea Planting Plan 46 2.75 Pine Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 47 325 Pine Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan all pine Good To Bel ngslanted -See Planting Plan 49 3 Aire Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 50 4 Locust Good Tree to be Remod - No replacement Value 51 3,25 fine Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 52 215 Pine Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 53 4.75 Pine Good To Be Transplanted - See Planting Plan 54 3.25 Pine Good To Be Transplanted- See Planting Plan 55 35 Oak Good Tree to be Remod -No replacement Value 5' 2.S Pine Good To Be Tranaplanred- See Planting Plan 57 4 Pine Good To Be Transplanted -See Planting Plan 58 B Ash Good Tree to be Removed . To be Replaced 59 B Ash Good Tree an be Removed - To be Replaced 60 5 5 Maple Good Thee to be Remod -No replacement Value 61 2 5 Honey Good Thee to Remain 82 3 5 Honey Good Thee to Remain 63 9 Honey Good Tree to Remain Total Calipers Removed: 43 Inches Total Calipers Replaced: 43 Inches (See Plant Schedule) al �� if fl I PY77rT SPAV149 a b' OG. WITH 4 6 Y TIES Pmt POST. HEAVY DUTY, HI6H OUT7 OF TREE CROM VISIBILITY CONSTRUCTION FE34C.IN6 mose or DRIPLINE7 IS TO BE USED. CORRESPONDS WITH ROOT SPREAD -- PROTEC71Ok4 FEWI eJlRla 1 T Z NE OR A f ilk / yailt.l '/QR 19 6REATAt � \`�x, / I illf — 1 1.0' RADIUS FROM TRUNK FOR EVERY V GALIPER OF TREE SIZE (OR IS') "4IC e I 6REATER DETAIL EXISTING TREE PROTECTION N T5, l L D O b O O t O 0 J 0 O Z W i a ILU M c 0 L ass E 7 0 of urnREw"�yo EN6uSH f ,� tG01 W W 3o �R C D—no, ■ ZoMng O PrelMay D as set G Pendl Set o caewMlm 0 _ 0 _ 0_ la 7B. 090 -028 11 fl4nssg•tmdsuape Mdlltecture Tee TREE PRESERVATION PLAN-IT STUDIOS, LLC 1589 Newcomer Road Columbus, OH 43235 an --mbc ! ` / TP -1 (p) 614.505.1270 (f) 614.340.4624 NEVER. CUr LN11LL$R THIN LP TO U OF 9RHNC W RETAe8NO NATLIPA OF TRUE, DO NDT LEAVE STUDS SET TOP OF ROOT FLARE 4' ABOv CUT ALL BINDING AND REMOVE 104I TOP OF BALL 2" MACH LAYER AS SPECIFIED 4' DIA. X 4' 5AUcM AROUND PLN BED PRWARA11ON 914 PARTS TOPSOIL MASTING 114 PARTS ORGANIC MATERIAL LOOSEN °- UBGRADE AROUND CENTi AND INSTALL SAND AS N®® TC ADBOUAT19 DRAINAGE AND AERAT UNDISTURBED SUB1..R/'JJE SASE SET TOP OF ROOT MASS I" ABOVE FINISH GRADE /ATE HOLE I]" LARGER SPADE EDGE ROOT BALL FY SIDES OF HOLE GRADE OW nMr LdOT MR 11PACO10 •' I'rrvllaSSe v f * I'{d4tnkl► eeD l L 2 2' pt'J� -PEAT MOSS IHI:1p4PORRATF$ INTO 6" OI' 1Y4P68M1. 12' DEPTH PRIVAN1117 F!'R L� Y'E DETAIL GROUNDOOVER PLANTING DETAIL NnTFS I CONSULT RANT 504EVULE FOR PLANT SIZES AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTWTIN& ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE AROHIT rT IF FIFA CONDITIONS WARRANT ADJUSTMENT OF PLANT LOCATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR 16 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PLANTS DRAWN ON RAND. PLANT LIST QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY 4. ALL SHRUB AND 6R WO COVER BEDS (PASTING AND NOV TO BE MULCHED WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCN159 OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. B. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A FULL I YEAR GUARANTEE ON ALL PLANTS INSTA AMID PROVIDE COMPLETE MAINT@NA'NCE ON ALL WORK DOPE BEGINNING ON THE DAY OF APPROVAL FROM OYIIERS REPPZ!SE TATIVE AND CONTINUING FOR A THREE MONTH DURATION AT WHICH TIME OWNERS REPRES194TATIVE WILL DECA -ARE JOB ACCE°TANCE, 6. EACH PLANTING TO BE FiiO: FROM DISEASE, INSECT INFESTATION AND MECHANICAL INJURIES AND, IN ALL RESPECTS, BE READY FOR FIELD PLANTING. T. ALL PLANTS TO CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NL RSERYME4 STOCK (ANSI -Z&O.1 -2004) IN REGARDS TO SIZING, &ROWING AND BOB SPECIFICATIONS. 8A. PLANTING HOLES TO BE DUG A MINIMUM OF TWICE THE WIDTH AND 6 -6 1NCMIM DEEPER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL OF BOTH SHRUB AND TREE AND TO BE AMENDED WITH ORGANIC SOIL CONDITIONER (I.E. NATURES HELPER OR PRO MIX). 8B. IN AREAS WHERE BEDROCK OR HEAVILY COMPACTED ROCK FILL IS BNC "MRED, THE PLANTING HOLES ARE TO BE DUG TO A MINIMUM OF 114REE TIMES THE WIDTH AND ONE FOOT DEEPER THAN THE SIZE OF THE ROOT BALL. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARGHITWT IF FIELD CONVITONS WARRANT ADJUSTMENT OF PLANT L.00ATION5. S EXISTING GRASS TO BE R 110VED, IF PRESENT, AND TOPSOIL TO BE SPRFAD SMOOTH AND HAND -RAKW TO RF] ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAT I INCH IN DIAMETER PRIOR TO LAYING SOD OR SsIN6. 10 ALL CHANGES TO DE516N OR PLANT 9uB5TTVTIONS ARE TO BE AUTHORIZED BY THE L.4NPJ APE ARCHITECT II TOPSOIL MIX TO BE 5 PARTS SCREENED TOPSOIL AND I PART ORGANIC MATERIAL. (I.E. NATURES HELPER OR PRO MIX). R04OVE CONTAINER OR TOP 1/9 OF via BURLAP 4 CUT HIRE BASKETS B® PREPARATION 9/4 PARTS TOPSOIL 1/4 PARTS ORGANIC MATERIAL 2' MACH LATER AS 3FF'.Inw Fixl<H GRACE PLf"T AM VW OF Prat HS TO RLMOVB DEAD OR W MtED LIMBS. 9£*A1N THE NATURAL SHAPE OF SIRuB. TAD NOT CUT THE MAIN LEAZn . DETAIL PLANTING FOR EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE KEY QTY BOTANICAL NAME 001-440N NAME SGOI REMARKS pa a m A u 6- HT Deciduous Tree AP I 'Bloodgood' Japanese Maple B & a CARPDitiS also Frans Fontaine 2.0' cal. Deciduous Tree CB 10 'Frans Fontaine Hornbeam 10 -Tree Planting Requlremanl GITANOC Kentuck ee 2. caL Deciduous Tree GO 13 dloicus Tree _ B & a Future Planting MALUS Prorlefire 2.0' cal. Oseidumn Tree MS 3 'Prarlefre' Carbapple I.4epU4a Ar4 Pwov mw GLEDIMA triacanthos a 2.0' cal. Dedill Tree GT 3 'Sk Inc' Honey Locust 8 & B 3-Reple —ent l rubs am n 2.5' col- Deciduous Tree OR 1B 'Fastigiate' Oak B & B 4 Planting end 14 Replacement IILYUS z Urban 2.0 Cal Deciduous Tree OF B ' Urban Elm' Elm B & B &Parking Island and 1 Replacement THUJA occidentdis Wintergreen 6' HT. Evergreen Tree TG B '1Nnter eon' Arborvitae B&B THUJA occldentdis Mission 6' HT Evergreen Tree TO 23 'Adm Arbvvltae B&B BERBERIS thual/ergif Crimson Pygmy 3 Gal Evergreen Shrub BT 4 'Autropu urea nana' Barberry CONT, EUONYMOUS alato Compact Deciduous Shrub EA 16 '. ccla Burning Bust Cant %NUS Austrian 6 -T HT Evergreert Tree Pill 113 ni ra pine B&B service Door Soreaning AjmPERu§ c. Pact ftizedana Na.3 EvergreLVl Shrub JC BO 'PRizerlana comoacla' Juniper Cont. Future Planting IUNIPERUS c. Sea Green No.3 Evergreen rub JS 61 'Sea Green' Juniper Cont. TAXUS x media Dense 24' Ht. MIN Evergreen Shrub TO 45 '0ensiformii Yw 8. & B. CALAMAGROSTS x a. Karl Foerster W O Grass KF 32 Pam is Feather Reed Grass CDNT. PENNISETUM a. Dwarf Fountain I Ornamental Grass PH 79 Ha 'rden Grass C0 t + RUDBECKIA f. Black Eyed I Gal Perennial + + + B '0aldslrgat' Susan CONT- 4' 0,C- STELA Stella D'Oro Perennial SO 60 Da illy CDNT. + + IB 92 iMPERATA Japanese f Perennial + + + t BNaod Grass CONT 24 O.0 s TOP � Rc MASS ABOVE FINISH GRADE SPADE EDGE BBD PREPARAnt 9/4 PARTS TOPS 1/4 PARTS ORGANIC MATERIAL DETAIL PLANTING FOR SHRUBS Site Data Y HAZH LAYER PUS14 d*ADE Tree Replacement - 43 caliper Inches to be replaced - See Sheet TP -1 for trees to be removed Vehicular Use Area Requirement (See Plant Schedule for plants used to meet requirement) Requ'retl: 1 Iree140 h, of boundary of vehlmlar area OFT,4 loom Group A, B, or C, plus a 3,5 ft. average height continuous Planling, hedge, fence, wain or earth mound Provided: Ordy to be Installed If BMW development does not occur Interior Landscaping for Vehicular Use Areas: (See Plant Schedule for plants used to meet requirement) Landscape Area: Required: 5 sf of landscape area per 100 of of vahtcutar use area Pmposed 45,591 sf of vetdculer use area / 100 sl' 5 sf = 2,290 sf Provided: 2,608 sf of Inlerlor landscaping Tree Planting: Required: 1 Tree per 5,000 at of ground coverage. Proposed 69,068 sf of BuNding Coverage and VUA 1500 of = 14 Trees Provided: 14 - 2A' Caliper Trees Athin proposed parking Islands A nnlyd um of 1 Tree has been added to each PaMing Island Additional Site Landscaping Requirement Required: Business Commundty Use: Lardscape areas equal to 2% of are bullding ground coverage area BuM,g sf = 23,471 sr' 2 %= 470 A of landscape areas P—Mad: 2,876 sl sr of landscape areas Street Tree and Public Tree Requirement - Not Applicable r l L 0- Z) O ✓✓ V Oo J Z 0 w N Z LU L O O J L N v + N E a in cn rn sea OF J. a at ENGLISH y p t001 ■ z"ras9 D ens' D Pemwsa D co --. Revhbm a_ A_ A_ H Inl614.5e5 nor ule ia Nw,r7R LANDSCAPE DETAILS LD-i DETAIL GENERAL TREE PLANTING STAKING GENERAL NOTES w 9EMO+E ooMe9flE POLE 64ES MR Ali P01E 1121115 TINT ICE TO 9E MI=Tm. 7II I 1 1 I ! Y I I 'f I 1� , ' t � l 1 I 1 1 I� l i r I I I I 1 i l 1 I �l I ! I I I 1 I i JLi wf ! uf ' I 1 I I 1 I f l I f ' i I O CODED NOTES i. OEIWATM ualr POLE. SEE ARRM Po9 ROMATE91. 2. KV FOIE LILY1f OR Wh1L MOM= LM a W L nMD FIMWAIm HOUSE SIDE MIE D ON W90M Of MVXSM OF ♦, LqM POLE PM 915E M K 9EUOMED. TUM OVER UGW AM P= M awmR. d (L. n 0o o° aw zW Mme_ WWa Q. - J Ito© J:\2009 \0905 -ESL Mld.n 11 I10\SL1.dv 11/19I2009 0:01:+0 PM. —k EQUIP. GND. CONDUCRM TO LUMWARL 010 THIN uP TO ww"m FUSED N -lNE CONNECTOR IOT WITH WATERPROIF OM AND 6AE""W" RDZUlACLZ OffaLED ON Ppm ARM WATERPROOF BOOTS ! BREAKAWAY STACK N WRNO TO BRED RECEPTACLE INSTALLED ON PHASE WIRES. FUSE AT 150% FL A. f RUSSYAH •IIEe' SERFS FUSEHOLDER WIH KEK -R CONNECTORS !FUSE HOLDERS OUT E FUSE$ OR APPROVED EQUAL) 600 VOLT HIGH COPPER ALLOT SPLIT POLE GROLID LUG UWSULATER BOLT CONNECTOR. (BURNDf �5 COPPER COMPRESSION 7BUMUL UL LISTED FOR BDO VOLT. DRILL TE�YTN TFFi1 5HRN1( TAP SPLICES. RAYCHEM CTE TO T A pJ S S, OR APPROVEII EOAL) - SER6) aF THREE) RBA a BRUSH ALL CONDUIT ENDS 06 FANG COPPER GROUND JAIPM ROAN a BUSH ALL CONDUIT ENDS. E 10P m TO DAMN. NN VOID TG Tilt YOPL >BI� B ASE s L w � O SCOPE SHALL !� SIIMl1011L HONdE9ILD. COMPLY F VOID BETWEEN [ SOLID AFTER PLU EW TOE cMOUT S1MLL BE WAH GA- fr631. } i avA FERED EDGES. SERE, OR APPROVED EO1N1L) { ALIG C01PLY WITH CRo-C�21. ANCFIOR BOL75 SUPPUED BY POLE WNUFACRDFR. �•� • fNam Guff .r ` ; • FYWSKfO GRADE FINISH. FLAT LENS. r ,Y • I P/C CONDUITS BARE am. A I �L C Com"'ER D ... TYPE W. 1000 PS CONCRETE. 5-72 — ---- a • AR ENTRAINED. REMOVE ALL EIGPOSER e. m TO I FM MARKS a FILL ALL SURFACE to ma FxO— AA I `AIDS. HAND RUB DO'OSED TOP a SO WITH SANDCOAT. APPLY TWO ILS LIGHT OISTRIBUIION ON A 25' (LNLI35 NOTED OTHERWISE ON PWLI. CCATS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING TO AWLUFACTU U rED I r BELOW GRADE y 1 >._ •---' HORIZONTAL AND FIXTURE GT. N0: /WST-175Y -Ff- WHITE- SLWMVOLTACE REINFORCING ROD S. ASAP A- 15 S. AST . GRADE 00 TYPE T oEFORLEn W2 10 " ) , COCPFRIIOD - MlE[. m W rWTGr.NS. EaRMLr SPNXO. XORI2GVRALS a7ar!HD ROD MIEN IN Oorrw of :OHGwG TIq,1SFl 2 DM Ir ON [EA, • xz- FIXTURES- AN+-u- r Gw -cWf1E aoYrA SECTION MINOR PL6. PL5(2) 2 POLE BASE DETAIL LS !/ TUTS EASED N -UK COENECm %FT ■RH SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT GROUND CONDUCTOR WATERPROIF OM AND 6AE""W" RDZUlACLZ OffaLED ON Ppm ARM TYPE UP ro LUMINY E rm AT INN FUL fWDSDLAN TREK' sfRIEs FALADOLDEII M-R RELOCATED SINGLE HEAD AIM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH (l0 1HIW1 w TO UAIFIANE FL5C ON APRR9LFD ERNW4) �. GALTETED HANNDLE PROVDE sLAa 000AOLT WON COPPER AUX SPOT BOLT METAL HWDE LAMP. TYPE FORWARD THROW LIGHT OSTRI rOL N WPM TO INDD a CoMNEfrDR bud Lrr 75 Sim oR APPROI® E INSULATE YTfFL IQAT RU HA CONNECONNECTORS EIRE HOLDERS OUT TH IOHOLE. M�mNx ). ( t j°N ROAN a BUSH ALL CONDUIT ENDS. POLE GROUND UAL UwraRATm GROUT-SLOPE TOP 1 N• TO BMDL COPPER COMPRESION 7DOBMFILL L LA LISTER FOR 609 VOLT. oRRL EOUAIS: F VOID BETWEEN [ SOLID AFTER PLU EW TOE cMOUT S1MLL BE TAP, a BOLT TO POLE ((EUAIBIDI' YA' PSL HIGH SIIENCi -A -D-f SERE, OR APPROVED EO1N1L) HORIZONTAL 100 WATT PULSE START METAL HALLOO LAMPS, TYPE 5 ALIG C01PLY WITH CRo-C�21. /6 BARE COPPER (ND. JUMPER. �•� CJMWERED EDGES. .r ` ; • FYWSKfO GRADE FINISH. FLAT LENS. I 7 SPARE COIDUT RELOCATED SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLED BY ......ATION SCOPE �, ; ' FOE MANUFACTURER, PETAL. HALIDE TAMP. TYPE FORWARD THRM LIGHT 06TPoBIITIOL O MOUNTING HEDRTIS AS NOTED ON PLAN. WHITE FLASH. FIAT LENS. PVC CONDUITS LIGHT OISTRIBUIION ON A 25' (LNLI35 NOTED OTHERWISE ON PWLI. ` r AWLUFACTU U rED y SAM N PVCC COPPER GROUND 1 TYPE 0. 1000 PB CONCRETE FIXTURE GT. N0: /WST-175Y -Ff- WHITE- SLWMVOLTACE 5-7% AIR ENTRAINED, MUM ALL TO ) j { EXPOSED FORM MWM ! FILL ALL SURFACE VOIDS. NAND RUB EXPOSED fA4 l >w TOP a SLOES WIN SADCDAT. APPLY SAT7 NEW POST TOP MONIED DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN LIGHT TO MATCH EXISTING. 2 COTS CONCRETE WATERPROOFING To 12 BELOW GRADE UNDISTURBED EARTH. •� • ' • r. Ci . 175 WATT METAL HALIDE LAID, TYPE 5 LIGHT 05T UIDN, WHITE FINISH, ON A 12' ROUND STRAIGHT POLE •• L-- ., ---w -- IDRMOIf1AL k VROCAL 1WREOR�4 MANUFACTURER LOOS POU SON MIT04. AMMU A - 6I CRAOf B0 T -PE �' fE10N6S0 ELLET FIXTURE CAT. N@ SATELUT MAD /SATT- MAX- 1 /175W /MH /EDZB-WHF EO UMLY SP ACED, ROD DRIVEN N BOTTOM Of DOOM 1'-6 W 1 LNLIUAI 2 COIICAF{Y Ob1411 .sFcnON FIXTURE- SAT7 a POLE BASE DETAIL SL2 NTS J: \2009 \0905 -ESL M16.b err M, \SL2.6.5, 11/1912009 6•.01:57 PM, —k K n HIAL LAM LE LIGHT ENS. RE STRAIGHT POLE ROTE BASE E NIAL LAMr E LIGHT :NS. IE STRAIGHT POLE REFS BASE HORIFDFTA; LAMP AET,AL rw_vt WALL PIX70E, FLAT LENS. —, l FF^.�I L11z F) �� WR -� AA7T WIZ WA` STRAIGHT ' O LE i� ETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PL6' MUM im 2MY EIKT{M TYPE 'PLAUSS' FlXTUpE TYPE ryT/}, ryl►pA TYPE 5 LIGHT gtgFR�BNpGON TTPE 5 UGHT OWRIOUITON TYPES 3 LIGHT D", JOUTION T THROW LIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITH NEW HOUSE SIDE SHIELD NOTE: T LIGHT FIXTURE DETAILS SEE SHEET SI3 FOR APPEARANCE OF TYPE 'SAT7' SL2 NIB LIGHT FIXTURES. H F 100 WAIT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL 00 T O POLE LIGHT FIXTURE FIAT LENS. S g� 4 a ,� _o a 0 0 Q LLI Z w T li 9 Z � W (L Z J aM� OD 0 JOB MD. 0905 -ESL DRAWN BY LECI SCALE AS NOTED DATE NOV. 20. 20M BELT MO. SL2 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE DESCRIPTION TYPE DESCPJgION PLS RELOCATED SINGLE HEAD AIM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH WI NEW WALL MOUNTED CUfOFF WALLPACK LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A 70 WATT �. HORIZONTAL. 600 WATT PULSE START METAL HALIDE LAMP, TYPE 5 METAL HWDE LAMP. TYPE FORWARD THROW LIGHT OSTRI rOL LIGHT DISTRIBUTION ON A 25' SQUARE STAD EEL HT ST POLE, BRONZE FINISH, MT LENS. MOUNT HEIGHTS AS NOTED ON PLAN. WHITE FLASH. LENS. L. MANUFACTURER: LITFDWA FIXTURE CAT. NO: /WST-7OM- FT -WWIE- VOLTAGE EOUAIS: PLS(2) RELOCATED DOUBLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SOUARE POLE LIGHT WITH LAMPS: 70 WATT CLEAR METAL H RUDE BALLAST: H.P.F. HORIZONTAL 100 WATT PULSE START METAL HALLOO LAMPS, TYPE 5 MTG// HCT: WALL/ SFE PLAN �•� OS LIGHT TRWIBUIIOH ON A 25' SQUARE STAIf.HT STEEL POLE, BRONZE WATYS/VOLTAGE FINISH. FLAT LENS. RELOCATED SINGLE HEAD ARM MOUNTED SQUARE POLE LIGHT WITH W2 NEW WALL MOUNTED CUT -OFF WALLPACN LIGHT FIXTURE WITH A 175 WATT �•� HORQONTAL 100 WATT PEASE STMT IETAL IIMDE TAMP. TYPE 3 PETAL. HALIDE TAMP. TYPE FORWARD THRM LIGHT 06TPoBIITIOL O MOUNTING HEDRTIS AS NOTED ON PLAN. WHITE FLASH. FIAT LENS. LIGHT OISTRIBUIION ON A 25' (LNLI35 NOTED OTHERWISE ON PWLI. AWLUFACTU U rED SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL RILE, BRON¢E FLASH, FLAT LENS, NEW HOUSE FIXTURE GT. N0: /WST-175Y -Ff- WHITE- SLWMVOLTACE SIDE SHIELD. EIS; LAMPS: 175 WATT CLEAR METAL MAUDE SAT7 NEW POST TOP MONIED DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN LIGHT TO MATCH EXISTING. BALLAST: H.P.F. F / HGT: W SEE PLAN WATFS/VDLTAOE: 210 uA. 175 WATT METAL HALIDE LAID, TYPE 5 LIGHT 05T UIDN, WHITE FINISH, ON A 12' ROUND STRAIGHT POLE MANUFACTURER LOOS POU SON FIXTURE CAT. N@ SATELUT MAD /SATT- MAX- 1 /175W /MH /EDZB-WHF POLE CAT. NO: /RSA- 4.5-12'-WW LAMPS: 175 WATT CLEAR PEASE START METAL. HALIDE BuLAST: PULSE START NEC// HCT: 12' WATTS/VOLTAGE: 210 AAA•++ HIAL LAM LE LIGHT ENS. RE STRAIGHT POLE ROTE BASE E NIAL LAMr E LIGHT :NS. IE STRAIGHT POLE REFS BASE HORIFDFTA; LAMP AET,AL rw_vt WALL PIX70E, FLAT LENS. —, l FF^.�I L11z F) �� WR -� AA7T WIZ WA` STRAIGHT ' O LE i� ETE BASE FIXTURE TYPE 'PL6' MUM im 2MY EIKT{M TYPE 'PLAUSS' FlXTUpE TYPE ryT/}, ryl►pA TYPE 5 LIGHT gtgFR�BNpGON TTPE 5 UGHT OWRIOUITON TYPES 3 LIGHT D", JOUTION T THROW LIGHT DISTRIBUTION WITH NEW HOUSE SIDE SHIELD NOTE: T LIGHT FIXTURE DETAILS SEE SHEET SI3 FOR APPEARANCE OF TYPE 'SAT7' SL2 NIB LIGHT FIXTURES. H F 100 WAIT HORIZONTAL LAMP METAL 00 T O POLE LIGHT FIXTURE FIAT LENS. S g� 4 a ,� _o a 0 0 Q LLI Z w T li 9 Z � W (L Z J aM� OD 0 JOB MD. 0905 -ESL DRAWN BY LECI SCALE AS NOTED DATE NOV. 20. 20M BELT MO. SL2 (SAT1 LICIT) aaxL. feX!< 1 �aur�eaE <�/� Yaar.pw A�ti§xo:v ?za9 vixA::n parwax:al laWxJap:Yasat aJenha+.(3sn t,v�szs rx. tvH': �1.�is!+a "1^ kk k °• www.buisW�sen.cam -- " t� A_ _S poles post [lips /poles & cab:e hung EPA QUICK REFERENCE CHART: WKNOHp Y � � V uR7 Y.r 06S 7 m�' G LMJK9 "� ` hNI 9lWs � MJ , XH aiUM f� iti:; R o u n d S t r a i g h t ( R S A } I I f I E< [MMS 1 1 aalr 1 Itlub .... .r..ew< www.>�xltw. l.. FFUCr»e:.. PIXY www ---- l - - Sate iit_ Maxi (SATs LIGHT) W, walaX xamb.a metal halide UPPERREFL­ Isl spuvYESS STEEL 131 re• wn eiuntF�s srtE� N41' *E ' . - 4 ' 1 - R as R 4R G G4'Y�Ra✓ CWfCIYrW Te i vRncpnv >.p �� vEFSlov waLr _ apoR Nwlr_ -- ~11 uM 1 - 14'11 ..lrvtp -!�y (Braamplxsl MO E -- ��,l9Mw T!C <Q<Sa<'AfL «<MnbV RSbn a0nlaa M.<Ti�T99 X AMSIG fi�YRMYYT CCNXr]/Nig aaiaKSFl6 p iM1u . ptn tkal{M IpUjg lasnwsellkF+ relr4 ,va�vel.»na;�Ywn,.v�au�c•1Je I1+::.I Re.hrz lssl,`xs -1:i lu isili3<5 -3559 PO eTl www.louhpouen.com -- Sateifit - Maxi post tops /poles a cable hung metal halide it �$ w�i w w:a V e ImsM�c R S31eBiI MoNJa gla a Rte M1 sym—eR:a Il:pn.M:n IM Jag! al Me tP J" -Jt en�va to mJO-y of Mz bM1ns b1a@J Jmmxa'C IRe an! ]Ne rng sletls Me lay R[m JaeRNex mM1 w Ip glry al g. ylln;ley.pnM rwW mJJeJ poRrnbnae Aase nmspnlnkslenlwvmxare M[ - 3 aelny irpnnon waM1� h51'� My RJ an Lzl rent amn,n (celJ'N IanO s:apl xlunn.m (e�R, Rk mLE1 tu1,WelIxAR� 3a vmaxn rw• ; m roux= '� �.ow.v� RI.s .�.... ,..... �s,nxul '1 /,sox /:r11(so)xngl �In /ltry �. Mt•t' 1/lioW /w /soaa I " syaar I X I w �uearnae la /atnrmelevx:llso-mrnd:. tv..5`aroMS umxeu'n� sure a zb � �±e,aiWei: yi �g .:n.w.�w„rN:a.�aMS�r nmla r.we �Nee:.�n� m�i ptlsa �m �.Ix.:Ax� rr-euy. awm:a�2nAU,.IS� 1 .aRM wema4vatl .Y la' Ioarr�.„I��u�:MVIr_,3�eR ae w,�Prtxr >, >I tewxx. 1 >saltw ai:s ra. ISVisas -ass, �a�en wwwJouispoUtsen,cam PL'e X ?t CL n o Cc r (D Q 00 4F_ Z Ic � 2 F W Fr w CL z U.) J �4'?::) s fD Q X118 NO. 0005--M ORM EM MM 9U' IIE �5 IIOIFfI M%X NOT. = 2M MEET W. SL3 1 1 Ir L. M M 11 Lf 11. M Ir 1• Q 1.a Ly W I.1 W L. Il M M N M Lt M t1 M Rt {. Lt L1 !.f W M L. L. L. M M L. M M Il L. L 11 L. M M! ,. Lt L. M M U L. 1-s N M N L. M M Lt M M M M M L. 4 4 W L. W W W W W L. Ir M {1 M 4 M N N Il L. 11 1., Lf N M Lt V In N Lt {.. 1l M M M Lt 11 M L1 M M Lt M Il L. M 1.1 M Il \. W W la 1.• l.. Ll 1.. L. L Ia {1 I.• t.. It M 1.i sr Li 1-. to t+ 11 M 11 N V 11 M N N M M M \l Lf Rt Lt M R. M L. Lt L. R. W 1•, M L. 1.. I.y L• 1 I.y I.. S.. I.. L1 LI N M M 1.1 M 1 -1 M 6. L. L. L. Ir V Il M M 11 N M M t1 M Lt M M M Lr 1.. W W 4 L. L. LA L. 1.. La ll : \r I1 11 N IA 1. 0-1 11 1 -1 t -. 6-1 La W 1r {l N M 11 11 N 1.. 6. I.t I.. M 11 M L. 11. R. N 11 I.. 1.s 4 C. Ly Lt Aa N I.a {.a LI L. 1.1 Il I.r M 1. y L. L1 /l 1 -1 6_1 Ir W W Rs W M M M M I.. I.. %.I 1.f M M M L. L. W W 11 I.. 1, 1. 1a EMSTwG � umfr' lyp'( PMT t to \.. R. N M Ir I.1 1.r M Ia W 6,1 M lr Lt I.. I.t M I., M R. I.. L. M 11 11 C. I. I.. r ., , Of AMNS. mss.' PL3("S,.) ' /� Ll L1 I.1 it 1.. Ir la Ia c. 1.• . . -r !.. i.. L. a.. ... i.. t.. i.. 1.. L it Lf Lf i� l.r M La L. N L. La I. La M I.. I..i � L. Y , vt3(+ts5) -�.� -_ fiy - '" la L1 1•. 1•t 1+ 1.. tr M M S. 1.. 1.. - 1.. Lr M la M M M a t.r M l.. Ir =.t tr PLt�M M M Li La Iw L• IS 4 � - _.• -•'• _tA S.t V. 1.• f_a fa L Lf Sr 1.. . S,. la Sr {�h M I M S -a ar i - r.. Ir M M W S.. S.. N L. S.. M M La lw 1.. Lt Lt L. eamm °. �• -�• POLE-- Lt M M L. fa 1.. L4 W1/w la M S.1 1. Lf M M N M N L/ LM L. M L• L. !. is i.r 1.. fw f1 1 -a La M lw Ir I.e M M ' tT PIS -•- _ ,_- W .:r M la 1.r 1.. W W fa W W Iw f.1 M l.r L. 11 N M -- Lt M K-a !.1 l.. 1. L• i.f \., 1.1 M !.a f Iw {r M la 1 L �.f I.f �- ...__ _ ,t f • 1 L* W1 M M 1.t ,y 'r w1 W1 � _ 5Y yy Z 1 L I . f �_ •.1+`r 4 `, M 1. 1-. M M M N Sr Ir L. W M W N I .. C t la • fa M M 1.a 1 il. Ls 1.f ` \ - owl wl R. .. L. Kf W W W +.. W 1.. Ir W wt �. fLt Lt L, !., A N • t.. I.t La Lt b. l.. I.f _ SYn v 3� L. i U W A A \.. N N 1 a 1 1 la + L• M Lt M �.t Il 1.1 ` + M M 1 1 1 ! - a L. 1 1 - 1y w tiA��' Lt N 1.. M ril - f i.. t . i., t. L. 2 Lt La I., W I tr M la W 1 ! M Lr f L. r W M t.. LI Ls Lj.��6.t L. I.. RR - La I It t! 1. 1 p 2l lta r /+ Lt W 1 +.. S..r N EXS'i1N0 WAl1PACtcS \ ♦ ♦, ♦ \ \ i�. . 173 YMTT M M Il 11 Lr M M I, iu Af M 1 a 1a 1 a / • A. M La 1.. II Rt Lt 1.. �'° - +.. -.._ _ ; ; ` t I.1 N M 11 I.r N Ll !.r L. L. M ! -. >s • � /., W2 1r LI��M !-. L. 4, M f• \a Ir �M Lt M M {�? ��_�S. 1 c. R. R� N }... L. N M l.r t.. M 1+ , +•_V/ ; !"w S., Lt Ra LEI Lt M Lt l � t fr 1!1 ," M W 7.. I.r N L. N 1r f1 M Ir • t . M \ i I Ig 1 �-- 1Ei- . i • Ir LI Il I, N M M Lt V.. N 1 a L. 4 M N 1r , 1.. M M M }a . Lt !.. lr ►.f M I { . Lf Il M Ls N M M 1,. 11 1. Lf tI" L. - N Lf La M M !.t �Y s JJ t EX5T C DCCOMTK PEDEMM U Hf j' DEISM POLE I�GHIS L ! cry c - i 7 _ i � }._ i 1.L�_ ,• %� i ; ii --------- a( 1 I l�l IJI + I I J 1 i1 �I 1, I I I I 1 I I I I f I , I I STATISTICAL' AREA - R OADWAY I t I >, I u_ I t I � I m C7 i I L I 1 I � f I I I I I I � ` I e d =) 0 rr r Q V0 D J �X Q 11] Z� ME w n _ z co J r� (0 roe wo 209-12 0e11111 er 11Ed sauE Ls n01E0 are xw. 20. mof stEEr Ilo. SLPXP J;\2009\0905-ESL 1fle.... «. M \SLPXP.a.9, 11 /19/2 6:02:33 PU. -h r]FNIFRAI hI0TFR 1. City of Columbus and Ohio Department of Transportolion Construction and Material Specifications, current editions, and any supplements thereto (hereafter referred to as Standard Speciftcatlons). shall govern all construction Items unless otherwise noted. if a conflict between spacifk:c6ans Is found, the mare strict specification will apply as decided by the City Englmor. Item Numbers listed mfor to Chy of Columbus Item Numbers unless otherwise noted. 2. The uc rty Engineer will not be responsible for moons, mgihode, Procedures, txhniqquee, ar sequences of aoneWction that are not specified herein. The City Enginmr will not ba reapoms ble for sa #sty on the work site, or for failure by the Contractor to parform wails according to contract documents. 3, The Developer or Contractor shall be responsible to obtain all necessary permits including but not limited to Ohio EPA Permits to Install (PTI) and Nations of Intent (N01), Building Permits, etc. 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Dublin Division of Engineering in writing at least 3 working days prior to beginning construction. 5. The Contractor sloop be aaia responsible for earnppiying with all federal, state and local safety requirements Including the Occupational Safety dud Haaith Act of 1970. Th e Contractor shall exercise precaution always for the protection of persons (Including employees) and property. it shall also be the sofa maponsibllity of the Contractor to 1nitlate, maintain and supervise all safety requirements, precautions ctsd proqrome In connection with the work, Including the requirements for confined spaces per 29 CFR 1910.146. 6. Following completion of construction of the site Improvamente and before requesting occupancy, a proof survey shall be praWdsd to the Division of Engineering that document* 'oe_bullt' elevations, dimensions, elopes and arlgnmento of on element* of thin project. The proof survey shall be prepared, signed and aubmrtted by the Professional Engineer who cooled the constructions dmwinga. 7 The Contractor construction all restrict construction activity to public right—of—way and areas defined as permanent and /or temporary construction easements, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer. 8 The Contractor shall carefully preserve benchmarks, property comers, reference points, stakes and other survey reference monuments or markers. In cases of willful or careless destruction, the Contractor shall be responsible for restorations. Resetting of markers shall be performed by an Ohio Professional Surveyor as approved by the City Engineer. 9 Non — rubber tired vehicles shall not be moved on or across public streets or highways without the written permission of the City Engineer. 10. The Contractor shall restore all disturbed areas to equal or better condition than existed before construction. Drainage ditches or watercourses that are disturbed by construction shall be restored to the grades and cross— sectlons that existed before construction. 11. Tracking or apkl3ing mud, dirt or debris upon streets, residential or commercial drives, sidewalks or bike paths W prohibited according to Section 97.38 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances. Any such occurrence shall be cleaned up immediately by the Contractor at no cost to the City. If the Contractor fails to remora said mud, dirt, debris, or spillage, the City reserves the right to remove them materials and clean affected areas. the coat of which shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 12. Disposal of excess excavation within Special Flood Hazard Areas (100 —year floodplain) to not permitted. 13. All signs, landscaping, structures or other appurtenances within right —of —way disturbed or damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The cost of this work shall be the responslbility of the Contractor. 14. All field the broken or encountered during excavation shall be replaced or repaired and connected to the public storm sewer eyetem as directed by the City Engineer. The cost of this work shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 15. All precast concrete products shall be Inspected at the location of manufacture. Approved precast concrete products will be stamped or have such identification noting that inspection hoe been conducted by the City of Columbus. Precast concrete products without proof of inspection shall not be approved for Installation. 16 Backfill within a 1:1 Influence line of existing structures (houses, garages, etc.) or public Infrastructure (pavement, curbs, sidewalks, bike paths, etc.) shall be compacted granular backRll according to Rem 912 of the Standard Speclflcatlons or Flowable CDF, Type III according to Item 636. Rem 911 of the Standard Specification, shall be used elsewhere. 17 The Contractor shall submit a copy of the approved construction drawings and a list of proposed precast concrete product manufacturers to the City of Columbus Construction Inspection Division before commencing construction. Send the Information to the following address: Construction Inspection Division C' of Columbus 18 Eaet 17th Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43219 Send a copy of the transmittal letter to the following address: Division of Engineering City of Dublin 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 18. All trenches within public right —of —way shall be bockfilled according to the approved construction drawings or securely plated during nonworking hours. Trenches outside these areas shall be backfilled or shall be protected by approved temporary fencing or barricades during nonworking hours. Clean up shall fallow closely behind the trenching operation. 19. AN trees, wlthln the construction area not specifically designated for removal ,half be preserved, whether shown or not shown an the approved constructian drawings. Trees to be preserved shall be protected with high visibility fencing placed a minimum 15 feet from the tree Wnk,. Trees 8 — Inches or greater at DBH (Diameter 8reaat Height) must be protected with fencing placed at the critical root zone or 15 feet, whlchaver Is greater, Trees not indicated an the approved construction drawings for removal may not be removed without prtor approval of the Division of Engineering, 20. Deleted. 21. The Contractor shall be responsible for the condition of trenches within the right —of —way and public easements for a period of one year from the final acceptance of the work, and shall make any necessary repairs at no cost to the City. 22. Povemante shall be cut In neat, stralght Ines the full depth of the existing pavement, or as required by the 011y Engineer. Pavement roplacement eholl be conducted according to City of Columbus Standard Drawing 1441 Dr.A and applicable City of Dublin standard drawings. The replacement of driveways, handicapped ramps, sidewalks, bike path,, parking lot povemerik etc. ohafl be provided according to the approved construction drawings and City of Dublin standard construction drawings. 23 Tree trimming within the construction zone Is to be completed by a certified Arboriet. At the completion of the project, the Arboriet is to return and trim any broken branches as needed. 24. Any modification to the work shown on drawings must have prior written approval by the City Engineer, City of Dublin. 25. All inlets shall be channelized. 26. Deleted 27. Deleted 28. Deleted CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO PRIVATE SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR VOLVO MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD 2009 j it r 1 =ice I II t f 1 1 I I�u� 11 4 J ET 4 _ _ r t + ♦ r i r + t BRENTLINGER REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC 5.500 AC. INST. 200403150056068 P.N. 273- 011297 U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 (VA— R / E JFIVTH) FRA. 33 -0.34 rf! ` f f 1 I I ,t DEVELOPER Midwestern Auto Group 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Phone: 614-809 -2571 STANDARD DRAWINGS The Standard Drawings listed on these plane shall be considered a part thereof. Columbus AA -5117 L -6306 AA —S133 L -6309 AA —S139 L -6310 AA -5141 L -6311 AA —S145 L -6312 AA —S149 L -6316 AA —S151 L -6317 AA —S155 L -6640 AA -5165 1441 REFERENCE BENCH MARK Designation: N 33 RESET Aluminum disc set In top of parapet wall over NW abutment of Avery Road Bridge over U.S. 33, 2.5 fL above road. Elev. 948.583' (NAVD 88 Reference Datum) BENCH MARK 11M VENTURE OR.1 1 — 60' BENCH MARK 01 'X' of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the north side of Venture Drive and east of business park entrance. Elev. 913.80' nff- INDEX MAP Scale: 1' — 100' Note: Midwestern Auto Group main alto, located to the west of this project was originally designed on the NGVD 29 Datum. Signatures below signify only concurrence with the general purposes and general location of the project. All technical details remain the responsibility of the Engineer preparing the plans. APPROVED: SHEETINDEX C -1 Title Sheet C -2 General Notes C -3 Demolition Plan C-4 Site Dimension Plan C -5 Overall Storm & Tributary Area Plan C -6 Storm Sewer & Grading Plan C -7 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) C -8 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Notes & Details C -9 Overall Waterline Plan City Engineer, City of Dublin, Ohio Director of Land Use & Long Range Planning, City of Dublin, Ohio By David M. Bray - Ohio Engineer No. E -43757 Dote LOCATION MAP NO SCALE Bird +Bull. C.F. BIRD & R.J. BULL, INC. Engineers and S-3 ors 2875W Dublin- Gmmille Road Columbus, Ohio 43235 Ph: (614) 761 -1661 v "9 —C95 Fax: (614) 761 -1328 f ,r _ 1 WWW.BIRDBULL,COM L BENCH MARK 02 'X' of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the north side of Venture Drive and east of telephone and gas markers. Elev. 910.98' BENCH MARK /3 'X' of north bolt on fire hydrant located at the north side of Venture Drive and east of Children's Close to Home entrance. BENCH MARK /4 Elev. 90 &7B' Chiseled square on west side of concrete base for light pole located south of Venture Drive and west of entrance to Children's Close to Home. Elev. 908.70' Dote Date GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL STORM SEWER UTILITIES 1. The following utilities are known to be located within the limits of this project: UTILITY OWNER TELEPHONE Fire Hydrants It Seven City of Dublin (614) 410 -4600 ��gqas Dublifi. Ohia Water Facilities of Columbus (614) 645 -7788 �It D of d. ) Cdumbue, Ohio 43215 Gas Colu Ga s of Ohio (614) 460 -2079 9 Columbus, OhOhb�J212 Coble TV Warne Cob (614) 481 -5000 1 C h mbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone Amaflech (614) 223 -8262 BC Cdu Columbus, Ohio 433215 Sechiclty American Electric Poser (614) 464 -7253 Columbus Dldslan 215 N. Front St Columbus, Ohio 43215 2. The Contractor shall give notice of Intent to construct to Ohio Utilities Protection Service (telephone number 800- 362 - 2764), Producers Underground Protection Service (telephone number 614 -587- 0486), and to owners of underground utilities that are not members of a reeggistered underground protection service. Notice shall be given at least 2 working days before start of construction. 3. The Identity and locations of existing underground utllltlea In the constructlon area have been shown on the approved construction drawings as accurately as provided by the owner of the underground utility. The City of Dublin and the City Engineer assumes no responslblllty for the accuracy or depths of underground facilities shown on the approved construction drawings. If damage le caused. the Contractor shall be responsible for repair of the some and for any resulting contingent damage. 4. Location, support, protection and restoration of all existing utDltles and appurtenances, whether shown or not shown on the approved construction drawings, shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 5. When unknown or Incorrectly located underground utilities are encountered during construction, the Contractor shall Immediately notify the owner and the City Engineer. 6 Public street lighting may be to the vicinity of this project Contact the City of Dublin, Division of Engineering at 410 -4637, two days prior to beginning work. TRAFFIC CONTROL 7 Traffic control shall be furnished, erected, maintained, and removed by the Contractor according to Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (OMUTCD), current edition. x All traffic lanes of public roadways shall be fully open to traffic from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM unless authorized differently by the City Engineer. At all other hours the Contractor shall maintain minlmum one-Jane two -way traffic. Uniformed, off -duty police officers shall replace flagmen designated by the OMUTCD, and shall be present whenever oneJane, two -way traffic control Is In effect Police cruisers may be required as directed by the City Engineer. 9 If the City Engineer determines that the Contractor Is not providing proper provisions for traffic control, the City Engineer shall assign uniformed, off -duty police officers to the project at no cost to the City. 10 Steady- buming, Type 'C' lights shall be required on all barricades, drums, and similar traffic control devices In use at night 11 Access from public roadways to all adjoining properties for existing residents or businesses shall be maintained throughout the duration of the project for mail, public water and sanitary sewer service, and emergency vehicles. The Contractor shall provide a traffic control plan detalkng the proposed maintenance of traffic procedures. The traffic control plan must Incorporate any traffic control details contained herein. The traffic control plan proposed by the Contractor must be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 12 The Contractor or Developer Is responsible for submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be reviewed and approved by the Ohio EPA. The NOI must be submitted to OEPA 45 days prior to the start of construction and may entitle coverage under the Ohio EPA General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with construction activity. A project location map must be submitted with the NOI. A sediment and erosion control plan must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval If a sediment and erosion control plan has not already been Included with the approved construction drawings. This plan must be made available at the project site at an times. The design of erosion control systems shall follow the requirements of Ohio EPA, Item 207 of Ohio Deportment of Transportation Standard Specifications, and the City Engineer. An Individual NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit may be required. The Contractor shall be considered the pernittee. 13 The Contractor shall provide sediment control at all points where storm water runoff leaves the project. Including waterways, overland sheet flow, and storm sewers. 14 Accepted methods of providing erosion/sediment control Include but are not limited to: sediment basins, alit filter fence, aggregate check dame, and temporary ground cover. Hay or straw bales are not permitted. is The Contractor shall provide adequate drainage of the work area at all times consistent with erosion control practices. 16 Disturbed areas that will remain unworked for 30 days or more shall be seeded or protected within seven calendar days of the disturbance. Other sediment controls that are Installed shall be maintained until vegetative growth has been established. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all temporary sediment devices at the conclusion of construction but not before growth of permanent ground cover. BLASTING (If Permitted) 17. The Contractor must obtain a blasting permit from Washington Township Fire Department prior to blasting for rock excavation. The Contractor shall submit blasting reports upon completion of blasting to the City Engineer, the Owner, and the Owners engineer. Top of rock elevations shall be shown on 'as -bunt' construction drawings. TPACCir rnhiTL?ni 1. The Contractor or Developer Is responetble for submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be reviewed and approved by the Ohio EPA. The NOI must be submitted to OEPA 45 days prior to the start of construction and may entitle coverage under the Ohio EPA General Permit for Starmwater Discharges associated with construction activity. A project location mop must be submitted with the NO]. A sediment and erosion control plan must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval If a sediment and erosion control plan has not already been Included with the approved construction drawings, This pion must be made available at the project site at ail times. The design of erosion control systems shall follow the requirements of Ohio EPA. Item 207 of Ohio Deportment of Transportation Standard Specifications, and the City Engineer. An Individual NPDES Storm «ater Discharge Permit may be required. The Contractor shall be considered the permlltee. 2. The Contractor shall provide sediment control at all points where storm water runoff leaves the project. Including waterways, overland sheet flow, and storm sewers. 3. Accepted methods of providing eroelon/sediment control Include but are not limited to: sediment basins, snt filter fence, aggregate check dams, and temporary ground cover. Hay or straw bales are not permitted. 4. The Contractor shall provide adequate drainage of the work area at all times consistent with erosion control practices 5. Disturbed areas that wli remain unworked for 30 days or more shall be seeded or protected withln seven calendar days of the diaturbance. Other sediment contrcds that are installed shall be maintained until vegetative growth has been established. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all temporary sediment devices at the conclusion of construction but not before growth of permanent ground cover. BLASTING DELETED. SANITARY SEWERS DELETED. WATERLINE 1. All water line materials shall be provided and Installed according to current specifications of the City of Columbus Division of Water. 2. All public water pipe with a diameter 3 Inches to 8 Inches shall be Ductile Iron, Class 53. Public water pipe 12 In diameter or larger shall be Ductile Iron, Class 54. Public water pipe 20 Inches In diameter or larger may be prestressed concrete pipe. Private water pipe shall meet the approval of the City of Columbus Division of Water prior to approval of the construction drawings. 3. DELETED. 4. Public water Iinm shall be disinfected by the City of Columbus Division of Water. Requests for water line chlorination shall be made through the City of Dublin Division of Engineering. The coat for chlorination shall be paid for by the Contractor. 5. All water lines shall be disinfected according to Item 801.13 of the Standard specifications. Special attention In directed to applicable sections of American Water Works Association specification C -651, particularly for flushing (Section 5) and for chlorinating valves and Bra hydrants (Section 7). Pressure testing shall be performed In accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material Specifications When water lines are ready for disinfection, the City of Dublin shall submit two (2) sets of 'aa -bunt' plans, and a letter stating that the water lines have been pressure tested and need to be disinfected, to the City of Columbus, Division of Water. The Contractor shall be responsible for all costs associated with the disinfection of all water lines construction per this plan. Pressure testing shall be performed In accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material Speclficatlons. S. DELETED. 7. DELETED. S. The Contractor shall notify the City of Columbus Division of Water at 645 -7788 and the City of Dublin Division of Engineering at least 24 hours before tapping Into existing water lines. 9. DEIFIED. 10. All bends, joint deflections and fittings shall be backed with concrete per City of Columbus standards 11. The Contractor shall give written notice to all affected property owners at least 1 working day but not more than 3 working days prior to any temporary Interruption of water service. Interruption of water service shall be minimized and must be approved by the City Engineer. 12. Water meters shall be Installed Inside proposed structures unless a meter pit Installation Is approved by the City of Columbus Division of Water. Meter pits must conform to standard drawings L- 7103, A&B for 5/8' through 1' meters or L -6317, A,B,CW for 1 -1/2' or larger meters. 13. Water lines to be Installed In embankment areas shall be placed after the embankment has been placed and compacted according to the Standard Specifications. 14. Curb stop boxes shall be located at least 1 foot Inside the right -of -way and set at finished grade. 15. If the top of the operating nut of any wive Is greater than 36 Inches below finished grade, an extension stem shall be fumished to bring the top of the operating nut to within 24 Inches of finished grade elevation. 16. All water lines shall be placed at a minimum depth of 4 feet measured from tap of ffnlshed grade to top of water line. Water lines shall be set deeper at all points where necessary to clear existing or proposed ut0lty lines or other underground restrictions by a minimum of 18 Inches. 17. DELETED. 1. All storm water detention and retention areas and major flood routing swalse shall be constructed to finish grad hydro-seeded and hydro - mulched according to Items 203 and 659 of the Standard Specifications. 2. Where private storm sewers connect to public storm sewers, the lost run of private storm sewer connecting to the public storm sewer shall be Reinforced Concrete Pipe conforming to ASTM Designation C76, Wall B, Class IV for pipe diameters 12 inches to 15 inches, Class III for 18 inches to 24 inch pipes, and 27 Inches and larger pipe shall be Gass IL unless otherwise shown an the approved construction drawings. Inspection Is required by the City of Dublin's Division of Engineering. 3. Granular backfill shall be compacted granular material according to Item 912 of the Standard Specifications or Controlled Density Backflll according to Item 636, Type III of the Standard Specifications as directed by the City Engineer. 4. All storm sewers shall be Reinforced Concrete Pipe conforming to ASTM Designation C76, Wall B. Class IV for pipe diameters 12 Inches to 15 Inches, Class III for 18 Inches to 24 Inch pipes, and 27 Inches and larger pipe shall be Close 11, unless otherwise shown on the approved construction drawings 5. Headwolla and endwalls shall be required at all storm sewer inlets or outlets to and from stormwater management facilities. Natural stone and /or brick approved by the City Engineer shall be provided on all visible headwalls and /or endwalls surfaces. 6. Storm Inlets or catch basins shall be channellzed and have bicycle safe grates. Manhole lids shall Include City of Dublin logo and all curb Inlet and catch basin grates shall Include engraved lettering: VUMP NO WASTE: DRAINS TO RIVER.' 7. Storm sewer outlets greater than 18 Inches In diameter accessible from stormwater management facilities or watercourses shall be provided with safety grates, an approved by the City Engineer. MAIL DELIVERY 1. The Contractor shall be responsible to ensure that US Man delivery within the project limits Is not disrupted by construction operations. This responsibility Is limited to relocation of mailboxes to o temporary location that will allow the completion of the work and shall also Include the restoration of mallboxes to their original location or approved now location. Any relocation of mailbox services must be first coordinated with the US Postal Service and the homeowner. 2. Before relocating any mailboxes, the Contractor shall contact the U.S. Postal Service and relocate mailboxes according to the requirements of the Postal Service. USE OF FIRE HYDRANTS 2. The Contractor shall make proper arrangements with the Dublin Service Deportment and the Columbus Division of Water for the use of Ore hydrants when used for work performed under this contract and provide the city of Dublin a copy of the Hydrant Usage Permit obtained from the City of Columbus. The Contractor shall also send o copies of permits obtained from Dublin and Columbus to the Washington and /or Perry Township Fire Department. Permits shall be kept at the construction site of all times. 1. Before the final estimate Is paid, the Contractor shall submit a letter from the City of Columbus Division of Water to the City Engineer stating that the Contractor has returned the Siamese Valve to the City of Columbus and has paid all costs arising from the use of the fire hydrants. ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES 1TEIA I QUANTITY I UNIT I DESCRIPTION NOTE RE. ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES These quantities are approximate only and are not to be used for preparation of cost estimates, bids, or any other estimating purpose without verification by the user. Any discrepancies In the quantities shall be brought Immediately to the attention of the ENGINEER for evaluation. 1 THRU 5 DELETED. 0 N T - - - I I - N % 1 11 , I'A % ■ ( 1 �� a asy 4au �r e `. ^ x. Fuel . • q + .�$ 4 - �� V - -�'aps - --- pro. lei. f ar a r 1 °' ar - w r y ; ¢uc y — ` LEGEND ___ Remove and dispose of existing asphalt pavement ~_ r 7 fi f a jai Ex. R. ~' ~ 'r++.. won. Remove and dispose of existing concrete walk \\ I t y9 .time , a1 gip. a* 5 a ey ,o` °` v / 0'' \ ""M e a "`a I E`gp4` � .vw . CODED NOTES �, �a 1 a a c r O Sawcut straight edge and remove existing pavement. © Remove and dispose of existing concrete curb. a © Salvage existing sign for reuse by Owner. Ex Stm ca tion) I Light pole to removed and relocated. Refer to Site Llghtlnq Plan for r detaNe. LC,p A vox Lo I 0 Landscape sprinkle head to be removed. Refer to a C D Landscape Plan for data0e as aaa rW3 C Rt X33 �l rr� I �y NOTE: Refer to Tree Preservation Plan for notes and dotage f Y40 C C I I regarding the removal and protection of existing a a • M. � ?�A� ' e I 'do ! landscaping. •a ^ e ~aaaaa? ^! 'II F i r ! Stm. CB TC 912.E Fla r'L r i a g' PVC N 909- i ~� /f 1 ♦ I I aa a r Ff 8 `'.aia1t f�_ FF %a fat .cs 8 1 y eraial Ign I r, S ,r'�� r_ _ ��r'an a I r^ r I Asphalt t A f a I - w F t ✓`�� t o F 7 F` q �L !F �F � r ' 'a /F Can Fltta VOLVO MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO B & R .J. UTT DEMOLITION PLAN C.F. BI & BULL, INC. Engineers and Sune)ors 2875W Dublin - Granville Rend 87• 5s y1 w 46 .aQ U S. ROUTE 33 & 3�.i 61 TABLE Cebnbas.oble 43235 Ph . AV, n 1 i —D. 34 Fax (6 1 1 36 8 SCAti:: 1' - 30 — JOB NO. WWw.BIROB1n.L.WM BNN: S CItD:OMB BATE: 12. 17 9 09 -09 ` 'Pik R/W — ' Caps p lA -H. _ e °fit vant'rj A 44z— Pipe r Z 1 _ � —Z i II I t R_ to x F1 a� - le 1 N ' ' ti < rA5 ) r� 4 � ,x � ` � CAR WASH � • Ex .`` sf4ceo h Q StA ! Ck RNs c'R Mq ?3S �iiglI9 ( .0 I� • w a as <. i j ti ` 'ti j DN 2p02p qC j L194PlffC SL"Ai£ i 18?109 A, I 4 s * ; 9 r r 1< - A 1 PROP. BUILDING ' ` ADDITION } . L r rr f 1. `1►r rf' IF a / r d I i ' t a w l @ . - I O • n I r a s. sr a Ilf I I d 1 eo' P nt S.medr � (�D e - U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 69 ]ABLE FRA. 33-0.34 0 Pavement Surfoce ;utter Seal 1 2 J LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE lent Concrete, Class 'C' O STRAIGHT 18" CONCRETE CURB NO SCALE COMBINED CURB & WALK NO SCALE ? Q Na Q NO SCALE See �walk� — Po-d_wid ... _ ''.'�.•r.••: +. ;. ���..r. +: •. '. 454 Cement Concrete. Ckm • C' Item 304 gravel T 4' For walks T 6' For overhead door approach T 8' For dumpster 6: approach pad © CONCRETE WALKS & PADS NO SCALE Item 452. Plain Portland Cement Concrete, aces 'C' 1' Deep Expansion Joint k t.rawr or eamPncted w+bgrads O FLUSH COMBINED CURB AND WALK NO SCALE Portland Cement Concrete. Class 'C' Pavement Surface ' 'a Bonding agents per manufacturers requirements O EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB NO SCALE I Cf�CAlfl Medium duty pavement section ® Heavy duty pavement section O1 Item 404 1 -1/2' hot mixed hot laid asphalt concrete (85 -100) O2 Item 402 1 -1/2' hot mixed hot laid asphalt concrete (85 -100) O Item 304 B' Aggregate base (compacted In two equal layers) O Compacted •ubgrode O Item 402 2 -1/2' Hot mixed, hot laid asphalt concrete (85 -100) © Item 304 12' Aggregate base (compacted In two equal layers) O Item 402 2' Hot mixed, hot laid asphalt concrete (85 -100) CODED NOTES Oi Light duty pavement per detall. ® Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Road (Aerial FAAR) shall be 26' minimum width. OJ Fire Apparatus Accese Road (FAAR) shall be 20' minimum width. Q Transition curb height from 6' to 0' In 5' feet. 0 No curb In this area. Provide 12' wide aggregate level spreader per detail on Sheet C -6. © Provide hot applied crack sealant per Item 413 along )olnts between exlsGng and proposed pavement. Q Proposed retaining wall. Refer to Architectural Plane for details. L.r"Y Suo face VOLVO MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD DUBLIN. OHIO 43018 Bird +Bull &R.d. I NC. SITE DIMENSION PLAN and S C.F.BIRD — L Enginccrs urvc�ors 2875W Dublin -Gram die Road CoNrabus, Ohio 43235 Ph (6141 761 -1661 SCALE 1' 3D JOB Nil. Fax: (6 14) 761 -132fl I DATE: 1 W 7 Rll —Og5 WN'Yl' BIRDBULL C't]%1 L.r"Y Suo face .� m p .� a t w O V h N • , (1 Ong — 12 CPP S 909.45 Y 1 l 1 y5 %C11 E 909.33' 16 pas. x6 Ex. Stm. CB Sc \\ ee 19' TC 911.47' O TiW g10.49 �yl B' PVC N SW 9oy.ue A _ P vie 9�; i ' \i 12" CPP 900.52'\ i 12" CPP S 908 50'� ? _�1S `V, r �� r � , + � 2 � 1 9l4•s F - - - - -- � ot4 M 1 s 1!9. r 5 \ Jr n ; ♦ \� � r9 4- W T 'r �'�x/ (!,� ld 1,71- - \ l%� '� Qti F.F 85 SD W • 4� ♦ ti. 1 xfST 13,4 c co J J Ix.7 3.2 r AOI,�� %114 /if \ � � �%* W, 9 14fdC �]� F .E.c9}3.' 1 R 4 RN°°� p� 4 FS-913 J} JI JI 9j4 !!l11f J J f. J ° A o M =h J. rJ 1 \\ 977TaaJ't3!• d R ♦* J I1 4C Y J 9 FF Y , . = 920.17 J / JJJ J - JJ 1 J r" Ix n 0. I J rp" ' Wp J ��`J a J T�L�6f6 J ly r �' mar , CZ� lee a9a �e to r :fk� yf7, F 1 x�� i. d � r s - e - Q 1 �\ 0. E od' ` 16 IN low 1111111�rdffi 1 1�j il y � _J U.S. ROTE 33 & S.R. 61 IA FRA. 33- 0.34 �-EW 4a J N NO �010 N' Oro, a la� SCN.0 l — 30' 0 .W 80 W APAPI M SCALE LEGEND Existing contour e waea 7 — — — _ Proposed contour (w 7C 911.6x' x 912.60 Existing spot elevation ,1a• R c_p_M_9a5 3 s' - -- -- — --- x 1260 Proposed spot elevation 920 1 ` t`J l e.. r.c 916.63 C-17- d T, 91149 I T I 913 il k PRW. GRADE 1 I 11 1 I 46' - 13 O 0.162 1 66' 910 — 920 S o T.W. Top of wall w F.F. nbhed floor Q I T 915 T.C. 912a I I Subgrade Drain Trench Detall. Ex T.C. 911.6 Ex Ground 910 1 I II — — — PROP. GRADE Q0 Existing storm sewer pipe and / or structure is 1 I Er. 187 51. — I IV — 12 0 2.00R 1 9' — 12 a O.00x 202, unless removed by the excavation for the _1_1 proposed building construction. Structure to be 905 minimum depth of one foot below proposed grade = I prior to filling. 9 OE Install dean —out with Cast Iron Lld over existing 6' storm sewer south of proposed roof draln V connections. 900 I � n 1 Engi neers and Surveyors Q Roof drain leader O 1.00% maximum slope. I Q Type C rock channel protection placed 1.5' thick +J 895 8 + 3� ` 3_ Proposed Subgrade 0 No. 6 ar No. 57 �-EW 4a J N NO �010 N' Oro, a la� SCN.0 l — 30' 0 .W 80 W APAPI M SCALE LEGEND Existing contour e waea 7 — — — _ Proposed contour (w 7C 911.6x' x 912.60 Existing spot elevation ,1a• R c_p_M_9a5 3 s' - -- -- — --- x 1260 Proposed spot elevation 920 1 ` t`J l e.. r.c 916.63 C-17- d T, 91149 I T I 913 il k PRW. GRADE 1 I 11 1 I 46' - 13 O 0.162 1 66' 910 — T.C. Top of casting S o T.W. Top of wall N F.F. nbhed floor f � Direction of major flood routing CODED NOTES 905 O Provide 15 LF. of Perforated PVC Pipe per pp �7 Subgrade Drain Trench Detall. Qe Taper curb height from 6' to 0'. © No Curb In this area provide a 12' wide aggregate level spreader per detail on this sheet. Q0 Existing storm sewer pipe and / or structure is to be abandoned and Illled In place per Item 202, unless removed by the excavation for the proposed building construction. Structure to be abandoned In place shall be removed to a minimum depth of one foot below proposed grade = I prior to filling. 9 OE Install dean —out with Cast Iron Lld over existing 6' storm sewer south of proposed roof draln V connections. Q Proposed retaining wall. Refer to Architectural B ML npy 912 plans for deta Engi neers and Surveyors Q Roof drain leader O 1.00% maximum slope. I Q Type C rock channel protection placed 1.5' thick +J with filter fabric. $95 Propoaad Po ftrnY t Surface 3� ` 3_ Proposed Subgrade --- - - - �' No. 6 ar No. 57 0 1 Aggregate 12' 4' Perforated P.V.C. 1 Underdraln Fax: (6l4) 761-1328 SUBGRADE DRAIN TRENCH DETAIL Install specified lengths of 4' perforated P.V.C. underdrafn at all structures within pavement areas per the above detail. The underdrain In to be Metalled at a 1.00% grade toward th e etructure, with the upstream and plugged, and the Invert at the structure 16' below the proposed rim elevation. The underdrain shall be protected from construction traffic after Installation. Pavement Surface Flow f-2' Drop N No. 57 Aggergate 1-1 12 Ea111eTi d AGGREGATE LEVEL SPREADER DETAIL 910.6) S o � 9fm "� 905 e r1 pp �7 I s 5 a 900 <F B i B WI = I {yy1 R. CAYPAf`TFD GRAN7LAR V C.F I. BULL, INC. B ML npy 912 I Engi neers and Surveyors I g +J lin 2875 W,Dab-Granv ille Road $95 3� ` 3_ ColumbuS, Ohio 43235 —' 0 1 Ph: (614)761 -1661 Fax: (6l4) 761-1328 W WW.BIRDBULL.COM NO SCALE VOLVO MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO STORM AND GRADING PLAN U E _j "A p • ' `, v r I C ro 6,? 36 �4JJ rye c SRO 3 > t +` r F.F. - 97x;6(7 -v r 1y ♦ ♦ '�' � 7 4 F.F.. M.60 f ♦ ! ♦ i �" F.F. _ T3.8 ♦ y ♦.♦ � � —775 �!c I! r`rrrr•f ` ; 19 ° ,rji 1920.17 r r e f rr i — Jfr. 1'♦ �t� � � _ a 7C otneq` Aspho + I r `4Y �.. , 14! IR D + /7A� I 1 r Q I� I� U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 IA FRA. 33-0.34 E, 4' Woven Wire Fence VOLVO R� MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP lit 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD - 4 DUBLIN, OHIO Bird +Bull __ C.V. B4RD &R_i. B3R"L.W. STORMWATER POLLUTION M PREVENTION PLAN c4lumb —oh,o 432 Ph. (614) 741 -1661 iaa (614) 761.172X SCALE: 1' H0. J", r VIIAV 61RDWLLCOM 09 — (193 0 9 _j "A p • ' `, v r I C ro 6,? 36 �4JJ rye c SRO 3 > t +` r F.F. - 97x;6(7 -v r 1y ♦ ♦ '�' � 7 4 F.F.. M.60 f ♦ ! ♦ i �" F.F. _ T3.8 ♦ y ♦.♦ � � —775 �!c I! r`rrrr•f ` ; 19 ° ,rji 1920.17 r r e f rr i — Jfr. 1'♦ �t� � � _ a 7C otneq` Aspho + I r `4Y �.. , 14! IR D + /7A� I 1 r Q I� I� U.S. ROUTE 33 & S. R. 161 IA FRA. 33-0.34 E, 4' Woven Wire Fence THIS PLAN MUST BE POSTED ON -SITE IN THE PROJECT TRAILER. A COPY OF THE SWPPP PLAN AND THE APPROVED EPA STORMWATER PERMIT SHALL BE KEPT ONSITE AT ALL TIMES. . -- - -_ -- – -- - - ---- �Camalnnllen Cure k 1,141_ (Im") w --- - - -- - - --- -- _ -- - -- - -- - - -__ ?- -- '� —___ -- - - - _ V Can rwe VOLVO MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP lit 6335 PERIMETER LOOP ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO Bird +Bull __ C.V. B4RD &R_i. B3R"L.W. STORMWATER POLLUTION Fn,{inccrc and xm.s3rns 3975 W Publut -(Ham 111e kwA PREVENTION PLAN c4lumb —oh,o 432 Ph. (614) 741 -1661 iaa (614) 761.172X SCALE: 1' H0. C�'r oWH: S6 q(�:6N6 OA7E: 1T 7 VIIAV 61RDWLLCOM 09 — (193 0 9 THIS PLAN MUST BE POSTED ON -SITE IN THE PROJECT TRAILER. A COPY OF THE SWPPP PLAN AND THE APPROVED EPA STORMWATER PERMIT SHALL BE KEPT ONSITE AT ALL TIMES. . -- - -_ -- – -- - - ---- �Camalnnllen Cure k 1,141_ (Im") w --- - - -- - - --- -- _ -- - -- - -- - - -__ ?- -- '� —___ -- - - - _ V Can rwe SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES TIMING OF SEDIMENT - TRAPPING PRACTICES Sediment control practices shall be functional throughout earth - disturbing activity. Settling facilities, perimeter controls, and other practices Intended to trap sediment shall be Implemented as the fast step of grading and within seven days from the start of grubbing. They shall continue to function until the upslopo development ores to restabilized. STABDSZATION OF DENUDED AREAS Denuded areas shall have soil stabilization applied within seven days if they are to remain dormant for more than forty -five days. Permanent or temporary soil stabilization shall be applied to denuded areas within seven days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site, and shall also be applied withlo seven days to denuded oreos which may not be at final grade, but will remain dormant (undisturbed) for longer than forty -five days. SEDIMENT BARRIERS Sheet flow runoff from denuded areas shall be filtered or diverted to a settling facility. Sediment barriers such as sediment fence or diversions to settling facilities shall protect adjacent properties and water resourcee from sediment transported by sheet flow. Temporary erosion control features shall be acceptably maintained and shall be removed or replaced when directed by the Engineer at no cost to the Owner. All work shall be performed in accordance with the specifications. All concentrated water sources, shall discharge Into a viable sediment basin. All water sources @hall discharge In a non - erosive manner. All sail stockpiles shall be protected from erosion by perimeter control devices such as silt fences. These perimeter control devices shall be maintained throughout the life of the project. Permanent vegetation shod not be considered established until ground cover is achieved v"ch, In the opinion of the englneer, provides adequate cover and Is mature enough to control cog erosion satisfoctorgy and to survive adverse weather candltions. SEDIMENT FENCE This sediment barrier utilizes standard strength or extra strength synthetic filter fabrics. It Is designed for situations In which only sheet or overland flows are expected. 1. The height of a sediment fence shall not exceed 36 -Inches (higher fences may Impound volumes of water sufficient to cause failure of the structure). Z The filter fabric shall be purchosed In o continuous roil cut to the length of the barrier to to avoid the use of joints. When )olnta are necessary, filter cloth shall be epllced together only at a support post, with a minimum 6 -Inch averiop, and securely "ad. 3. Posts shall be spaced a maximum of 10 -toot apart at the barrier location and driven securely Into the ground (minimum of 12- Inches). When extra strarl fabric In used without the wire support fence, post spacing shall Not exceed 6 -feet. 4. A trench shall be excavated approximately 4- Inchee wide and 4 -Inches deep along the IIne of posts and upelope from the barrier. 5. When standard strength filter fabric Is used, a wire mash support fence eholl be foatened amuraly to the upelOpe aide of the poste using heavy duty wire staples at least 1 -Inch long, tic wires or hog rings. The wiry shall extend Into the trench a minlmum of 2 -Tnehm and shall not extend more than 36- Inches above the original ground surface. 6. The Standard Strength Filter fabric shall be stapled or wired to the fence, and B- Inches of the fabric shall be extended Into the trench. The fabric shall not extend more than 36 -Inches above the original ground surface. Filter fabric shall not be stopied to existing trees. 7. When extra strength filter fabric and closer post spacing are used, the w1ro mash support fence may be allmInated In such a case. the filter fabric Is stapled ar wired directly to the poste with Oil other provisona of Item No. 6 applying. B. The trench shall be badcfllled and soil compacted over the filter fabric. 9. Sediment fences shall be removed when they have served their useful purpose, but not before the upelope area has been permanently stabilized. Maintenance Sediment fences shall be Inspected Immediately after each rainfall and at least daily during prolonged rainfall. Any required repairs @hall be made Immediately. Should the fabric on a sediment fence decompose or become Ineffective prior to the and of the expected usable life and the barrier Is still necessary, the fabric shal be replaced promptly. Sediment deposits should be removed after each storm event. They must be removed when deposits reach approximately one -half the height of the barrier. Any sediment deposits ramalning In place after the sediment fence is no longer required shall be dressed to conform with the existing grade, prepared and eseded. Mountable Borm (optional) 3�,j rpavem ant Filter Cloth--' pgOF -1LE Ground S s rns3}•• 1.. ' I In. Exleting r •+ - pavement ELAN Is b CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. Stone Size - Use 2' atone, or reclaimed or recycled concrete equivalent. 2. Length - As required. (Minimum of 50') 3. Thickness - Not lees than six (6) Inches. 4. Width - Twenty (20) foot minimum, but not lees than the full width at points where Ingress or agrees occurs. 5. Filter Cloth - Will be placed over the entire area prior to placing of stone. 6. Surface Water - All surface water flowing or diverted toward construction entrances shall be piped across the entrance. 7. Maintenance - The entrance shall be maintained In a condition which will prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto public right -of -way. This may require periodic top dressing with additional stone as conditions damand and repair and /or deanout of any measures used to trap sediment All sediment spilled, dropped, woshad or tracked onto public rights -of -way must be removed Immediately. 8. Washing - Wheels shal be cleaned to remove sediment prior to entrance onto public right -of -ways. When washing Is required, It shall be done on an area stabilized with stone and which drains Into an on site containment area. 9. Periodic Inspection and required maintenance shall be performed after each rain. 10. This construction shall Include all materials and costs relative to constructing, maintaining, removal and restoration of stabilized entrance within the various sewer Items. ® STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE No Scale 2' x 4' Frame er ticking Bockfill Mat 1. Inlet protection shall be constructed either before upelope land disturbance begins or before the storm drain becomes operational. 1 The earth around the Inlet @hall be excavated completely to a depth at least 18 In. 3. The wooden frame shall be constructed of 2- by-4-In. constructon -grade lumber. The 2- by -4-In. posts shall be driven 1 FL into the ground at four comers of the Inlet and the top portion of 2- by -4-in. frame assembled using the overlap joint shown. The top of the frame shall be at least 6 in, below adjacent roads If ponded wotae would pass a safety hazard to traffic. 4. Wire mesh shall be of sufficient strength to support fabric with water fully Impounded against It It shall be stretched tightly around the frame and fastened securely to the frame. 5. Geotextile shall have an equivalent opening size of 20-40 slew and be resistant to sunlight. It shall be stretched tightly around the frame and fastened securely. It shag extend Pram the top of the frame to 18 In. below the Inlet notch elevation. The geotaxtge shall overlap across one aide of the Inlet so the ends of the cloth are not fastened to the same poet 6. Backfgl shall be placed around the Inlet In compacted 6 -In. layers until the earth Is even with notch elevation on ends and top elevation on sides. 7. A compacted earth dike or a check dam @hall be constructed In the ditch IIne below the Inlet If the Inlet Is not In a depression and If runoff bypassing the Inlet will not flow to a settling pond. The top of the earth dikes @hall be at least 6 In. higher than the top of the frome. Grote BFJ,YER DAM Lifting Straps INSTALLATIQN Stand grate on and. Slide the Beaver Dom bog on */darn on top of the grate. Pull all excess down. Lay unit on its side. Corefulty tuck flap in. Press velcro etdpa together. Install the unit making sure front edge of grate is Inserted in froma first than lower back Into place. Press veicro data together which are located under lifting straps. This Insures straps remain flush with gutter- [M CURB INLET PROTECTION No Scale Size Moats AiIdellnes 1lament Grate Maintenance Remove dried sediment from surface of unit as needed with stiff broom square point shovel. Remove fine material fn Inside envelope as need INSPECTION SCHEDULE 1. Diversion Swale fir Structural Protection - Inspect every 15 days or after each rainstorm producing runoff. Repair as required. 2. Inlet Protection - Inspect for sediment accumulation after each rainfall & dally during continued rainfall. Repair or replace when water flow Is restricted by sediment. 3. Vegetative PlanUng - Inspect after sprouting occurs k replant bare areas. Inspect established cover every 15 days for damage; Replant as required. Maintain Established cover at Maximum 6' height. Irrigate as required during dry periods to maintain live vegetation. SOIL PROTECTION CHART Stabilization type JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY. JUN. JUL AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. Penn Seeding A Temp. Seeding Mulching 8 A. SO% Kentucky Bluegrass B. 40% Kentucky Bluegrass 20% Perennial Ryegraes 60% Perennial Ryograss 5/ /1000 Sq. Ft 5/ /1000 Sq. Ft. C. Straw Mulch - 2 tone /Ac. Concrete Signer - Washout Area F 6.0' Mf(L'um 1 "4x4 Poet � s s ' A Ftallaw Out Area ,. L a Y al Sag Berm Fill 4' -8' with Silt Fence Aggregate (No. 57, No. 4 or No. 2) ® CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NO SCALE ® INLET PROTECTION - PAVEMENT No Scale ® INLET PROTECTION - GRASS No Scale MAINTENANCE With a stiff bristle broom sweep silt 3 other debris off surface after each event. I � ts ~F�PSIx►]fBTBR DRIYS�'_�_ 4 �_,_ \ -l- - • o as $X reo r ._f� .1 ! ' f , 1 }'• ��7 I� 1 r / ptAPMIC SC.tifY Y t , y . —� ��� 1 or. � " , i; �;� "°mot',',• , ,/' r 4 J r "\ --_r° .l }= T f1 G__ __*--_ ._ _ - ,Y l . .A ti, i a ` s t d I I I r t L__ - -I^Y ~�r�- Y' 'rk --y -ham L 4t I : EX. DETEMVON' Fes_ yr _ - �•�' _ 4� !tom i POND i�1 ry L o 4l s t rca•Y I i I '.��' b• FY. �F� � �.', r , FIRE gPPPRh1U5 nZMS R0+,0 (FAARS LA t caa wasw {, , 1 g 1� i• �\` t4wr �'' �\ \� SAa Sias ►� Iii G��• • `� ° 3 \ \ I ��- �Y'"t '�} �'�� I PRpypg:E6 I oil \ iE +Y r �� \' ''i . ! \ ��` _ °T��,t j 4 ■■ I llf �� \\ Y � > r � O O ,C 0 C a i i O U h q O A O O N +n If. U.S. 46TE 33 & S.R. s 3 -p VARIABLE rrinTHJ '�� FRA. .3i rh 2 BUILDING ELEVATION tz L " •JL 1 fe.4;"41 0• VASZ-k tv 'AT r - IL 7i� v:n e. e a - Ar� V/ f - AQ G: 4c 2 BUILDING ELEVATION SIM Illi = 1 MID WESTERN BMW l I I I I T 11 o o o t-6% 3 Cu "I C&Gq Ito,, 1 .0- L " •JL 1 fe.4;"41 0• VASZ-k tv 'AT r - IL 7i� v:n e. e a - Ar� V/ f - AQ G: 4c 2 BUILDING ELEVATION SIM Illi = 1 3 BUILDING ELEVATION 71 7 4 BUILDING ELEVATION sm UIC = 1 KEYPLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY PROPOSED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY [L D 0 01 p < Z z jmC 9 E LU 13 ­7 13 - 13 -- 13co�ao. A- A. A- A09 009 ELEVATIONS 11 o o o 3 BUILDING ELEVATION 71 7 4 BUILDING ELEVATION sm UIC = 1 KEYPLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY PROPOSED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY [L D 0 01 p < Z z jmC 9 E LU 13 ­7 13 - 13 -- 13co�ao. A- A. A- A09 009 ELEVATIONS VENTURE DR. — 60' L 10 )9 oso -oze r t - - ' l i \mow✓{ 93. ��� t C+cm [O 'Q � O " DlopWq Mee I - 86 LF Screenng at 12" High =1°! Mea 2 - 86 LF Al - VENTURE DR. — 60' L 10 )9 L� l MiE 0C D w O 0 au Z O0 U O Q 1 W W m .2 0- 0 J d d E a LA 0 a o m sr a w.m. 8 +Q 8 nrvNf aw xue oso -oze r CONCEPTUALPLAN l i \mow✓{ 93. ��� ®� 93' C+cm [O 'Q � O " DlopWq Mee I - 86 LF Screenng at 12" High =1°! Mea 2 - 86 LF - . SuesnNg t IZ" High Pn-kNg Lot 5c ~hg '3.S' S H1gh Shr'o Hedge pY� � Tetal Fraa * O1Q SR 16{ - 8g0 LF p'splpl eper&e llo.rea a[ ,"% . 7t2 1[ I bee per �' O.G U.S. ROUTE 33 & S.R. 161 (VARIABLE WIDTH) FRA- 33 -0 34 4 Scope 5.1 Slope Rots 161 DhYJ IMSnto" Lot SCALE o am SECTION A' -A' S"l.: HTS CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR REFERENCE ONLY L� l MiE 0C D w O 0 au Z O0 U O Q 1 W W m .2 0- 0 J d d E a LA 0 a o m sr a w.m. 8 +Q 8 nrvNf aw xue oso -oze r CONCEPTUALPLAN S D -1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUP) January 22. 2010 I. Summary The subiect site consists of 15.69- acre_ s of real property bounded by Perimeter Drive to the north, U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161 to the south, Perimeter Loop Road to the west, and Venture Drive to the northeast. It currently contains an existing automobile dealership on 14.78± acres as well as a portion (0.911 acres) of an undeveloped parcel lust to the east._ The applicant is seeking to add additional square footage to the east end of its existing facility in order to accommodate its Volvo automobile franchise that will be relocated from another municipality. This expansion also will create new office space for the operations of the entire_ dealership. This PUD will permit the same uses and same development standards as are currently gpplicable to the property while making accommodations for the expansion of the dealership_ II. Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. III. Permitted Uses A The followinp, uses shall be permitted in the PUD: (1) New and used automobile sales and service (2) General, administrative, and business office (3) Medical and dental office (4) Research, synthesis, analysis, development, and testing laboratories (5) _Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or service uses including, without limitation: (i) Automobile service (but not including; auto body work) (ii) Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories (iii) Non - retail, coffee shops selling beverages and snack food items for S SUBMITTED TO COUN 1 0 FOR MEETING ON Q /� PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 on- premises consumption (iv) Automobile rental services (6) One executive suite providiLig a sin le residential suite and related office space for the automobile dealership. (7) Detached non - retail car wash operated in association with automobile sales and /or service facilities, provided that it shall be used only by employees of the dealership in conjunction with sales and or services to customers. This car wash also shall be permitted to serve an automobile dealership located on the property_ to the east of and adjacent to this PUD should such development occur. IV. Setback and Yard Requirements (A) Venture Drive: The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) Perimeter Drive: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right - -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 65 feet for buildings. C State Route 161 fU.S. Route 33: The minimum setback from the State Route 1611U.S. Route 33 right -of -way shall be 6p feet for pavement and buildings, (D) Perimeter Loop road: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right -of -wax sha be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (D) Eastern Boundary: For all portions of the eastern boundary line of this PUD that are not adjacent to Venture Drive, there shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of 25 feet as measured from the eastern boundary line. In the event that the property to the east of and ad' aceni to this PUD is rezoned to allow an automobile dealershiI2 use. then there shall be a zero setback requirement for both building and pavement from the eastern boundary line of this PUD. E Interior Property Lines: There shall be no minimum setback re uirements from interior property lines within this PUD. V. Parking, Loading, and Stackinji Requirements (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this site shall be calculated as follows: (1) _Parking for automobile dealership uses shall provide parking at the rate of 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 mace per 300 square feet of building floor area for sales and related office uses, 1 per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. A single parking space shall be required to serve the executive suite. (2) Parking for uses other than what is accounted for in Section V(A)(1) of this text shall be provided in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. (B) Employee Parking: Parking for employees of any permitted user shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 161/U.S. Route 33. (C) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 161/U.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights-of-way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. (D) Loading, Docks: Loading docks shall be fully screened from the view of adjacent rights -of -way and properties and shall be integrated into the architecture of the buildings. (E) Car Wash Stacking: There shall be no minimum automobile stacking requirement for the non - retail car wash. VI. Architecture (A) Building Height: The maximum height for the car wash shall be 25 feet and for all other structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. (B) Design Intent: Existing, architecture in this subarea is modern and innovative and features the extensive use of glass and metal to promote transparency and a sleek, sip,nature look across the front of the buildings while emphasizing sharp edges and angles. The buildings are positioned to run parallel to and follow a crescent - shaped access drive that outlines the campus. The expansion of the larlcr building is to occur on its east side and is intended to create a visual focal point by enhancing the massing of the structure when compared to what currently exists on the property. The expansion of the building will implement a high quality of finish consistent with the architectural style and materials that are found throughout the property. (C) Plans: Architecture shall reflect the ,general design and character of the architectural drawings that accompany the preliminary development plan application. (D) Permitted Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 EIFS, stone /stone veneer mid concrete masonry units (CbM. (E) Roofs: Flat roofs shall be permitted in this PUD. Metal roofs may be found on visible low -slope conditions and membrane roofing on flat roofs that are not visible to the public. VII. Landscaping and Screening (A) Landscaping: All landscaping, shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscape Code unless otherwise specified herein. (B) Property Perimeter Screening. g U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161, the site shall be required to provide an average of one tree per 40 feet of lineal frontage to meet the intent of the arterial screening requirement and shall be exempt from the 6 -foot tall continuous screening requirement, as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. (C) Display Space: An automobile dealership shall be permitted to display automobiles along a maximum of 40% of its property's lineal street frontage. (D) Eastern Perimeter BufTer: It is anticipated that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD will develop relatively shortly after this application is approved. Therefore the pigperty erin re uirements of the Dublin Zonin g Code shall be waived along the eastern boundary of this PUD. In the event that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD has not developed with a use that is compatible with an automobile dealership on or before the third anniVersarry of the effective date of the approval of the preliminary development elan for this PUD, then a plan showing the details of the proposed buffering to be installed along the eastern boundary line of this PUD and adherence to the perimeter buffering requirements of the Dublin Zoning Code shall be submitted and installed by the applicant, subject to approval by Planning_ (E) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. (F) Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. (G) Mechanicals: All roof-mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights- of-way adjacent to the site. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 VIII. Signs (A) Desig Intent- _This site is unique in that it has fi can four separate public roads and utilizes three widely dis erred vehicular access oints creating a need for a comprehensive sign plan. The current approved sign package for this site recognizes the development of the property with a campus -like feel and accomplishes the goals f providing identification of the various automobile manufacturers offering vehicles for sale on the site, identifying the dealership itself, and providing ample directional sig_nag to allow customers and visitors to identify sales and service areas for different product types. The intent behind the sign standards in this text is to continue to utilize this same package while maintaining some limited flexibility to accommodate future changes to manufacturer types. (B) Alteration of Signs: Sign panels on the campus identification, directional and brand signs that identify automobile manufacturers on ground si ns may be changed without further review by the Planning and Zoning Commission provided that verification of the new panel's conformance with this text is made through the sign permitting_ process. or as otherwise specified herein. (C) Sian Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For purposes of this text. s �n, s shall be placed into one of five categories, for which separate standards are set forth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (2) Dealership identification signs (3) Directional signs (4) Brand signs (5) Wall signs (D) Standards Applicable to All Sign Types: The following standards shall apply to all suns in the PUD. regardless of how they are categorized: (1) Materials: All signs shall consist of materials that are complimentary to and of similar quality as the buildings found in this PUD. (2) Interior Signs: Signs located on the interior of buildings shall be permitted provided-that they are_not_ more than 3 feet in height and are not readily visible from rights of-way that are adjacent to the site. (3) Illumination: All signs found on the outside of buildings shall be externally PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 illuminated. except for campus identification signs, which may be internally illuminated. (4) Prohibited signs and displays: The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings:_ (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions (b) Painting or other types of surface graphics displaying prices, slogans, or other advertising, (i) as included on informational stickers provided by the manufacturer and (ii) a two -digit graphic shall be permitted on the windshield of used cars to indicate the year the car was made, provided that such graphic does not exceed 5 inches by _6 inches in size. (c) Logos and /or signs located on the interior of a building, that is easily readable from an adjacent public right -of -way shall not be permitted without approval by the Planning and Zoning? Commission (E) Campus Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs. (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "caxr►pus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. (2) Number: A maximum of two campus identification signs shall be permitted. (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the site entrances into the PUD from Perimeter Loop road and another shall be permitted to the southeast of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Venture Drive. (4) Overall Size: Fach campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose Vehicles are being sold on- site. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02/08/10 (6) Sign Area: Sign panels identifying automobile manufacturers shall be no greater than 1.5 square feet in area. The portion of the sign identifying the name of the automobile dealership shall not exceed 5.5 square feet in area. (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (8) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to utilize three colors. (F) Dealership Identification Sims: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "dealership identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 161/U.S Route 33 and/or a wall sign located at the building's main office entrance that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealership that is operating within the PUD. (2) Number: A maximum of two dealership identification sign shall be permitted. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 161 /US Route 33 frontage and one wail shall be permitted at the entrance to building's main office. (4) Overall Height: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 46 inches in height and a maximum of 32 inches in width. The wall sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height, as measured from grade. (5) Content: The dealership identification sign shall identify the name of the automobile dealership. No logos or identification of an automobile manufacturer shall be permitted. (6) Sign Area: The maxiinuxn area of the sign face for the ground sign shall be 17 square feet. The maximum area of the wall sign shall be 21 square feet. (7) Any modifications to the location of the dealership identification ground sign greater than 10 feet from the existing location or the movement of the wall sign to a location visible from an adiacent right -of -way shall require approval of the Planning; and Zoning Commission as apart of an amended final development plan. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 (G) Directional Signs: The following standards shall apply to directional signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a gxound sign used for the_pliMose of directing customers and other visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional si ns shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right -of way. (3) Size: Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inches in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square feet (H) Brand Signs: The following, standards shall apply to branding signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front facade of the primary building in this PUD and the parkin lot of and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the building. (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on_ the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a tart of an amended final development plan. (3) Size: Brand signs shall be permitted with the following size limitations: (a) Sign Type A (such as signs labeled K, L. N and 0): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. (b) Sign Type B_(such as sign labeled M): If multiple brands are identified at the same entrance, the overall sign may exceed 24 square feet in area, but each individual brand sign shall be limited to 6 square feet in area. The overall height shall not exceed 40 inches. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and/or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the si ng face. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02 /08/10 (5) Colors: Each individual sign-panel shall-be permitted to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. (I) Wall SigLis: The following standards shall apply to wall signs: (1) _Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "wall sign" shall be defined to have the same meaning as provided in the Dublin Zoning Code. (2) Number & Location: One wall sign shall be permitted in this PUD, located on the north fgade of the northernmost building in this PUD. This sign shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. (3) Height: Wall signs shall not exceed 25 feet in height. (4) Sign Area: Each wall sign shall not exceed a maximum area of 35 square feet. (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitted on the wall sign. IX. Lighting (A) Lighting for this campus shall be consistent in look and feel throughout the PUD. (B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development plan. lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin Cites (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 400 watt lamps. (D) Lighting poles and fixtures shall be consistent in color and appearance throughout the site and shall be dark in color and constructed of dark brown, black, or bronze metal. (E} External lighting shall utilise cut -off type fixtures.. (b) Cut -off type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. No color lights shall be permitted to illuminate the exterior of a building. (G) All lights shall be arranged to minimize light trespass onto adjacent properties. (H) Lighting of the dealership after business hours shall be of a low intensity. Interior PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for City Council 02/ ©8/10 lighting in showrooms during these hours shall be subdued so that the full interior is not illuminated. Hi h�lightin,g, of specific cars during these hours shall be permitted. Approved by City Council on: Developer SigLiature and Date: 10 PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO As Passed by Council September 6, 1988 Revised December 21, 1989 Revised February 5, 1990 Revised November 19, 1990 Revised January 3, 1994 Revised November 7, 1994 Revised February 6, 1995 Revised January 15, 1997 Revised September 5, 2000 Revised December 11, 2000 Revised June 21, 2001 Revised January 29, 2002 Revised February 8, 2010 J "URPAIT ED TO CCUN PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER TEXT INDEX PAGE SUBAREAMAP ...................................................................................................... ............................... ii PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA STANDARDS ................................................ ..............................1 SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ......................................................... ..............................4 SUBAREA A INTERCHANGE RELATED ............................................. ..............................9 SUBAREA B POST ROAD RELATED .................................................. .............................11 SUBAREA B -2, B -3 HOMESTEAD ................................................................. .............................14 SUBAREA C INTERNAL ORIENTATION ......................................... ............................... 22 SUBAREA C -1 WD PARTNERS ............................................................... .............................25 SUBAREA D STATE ROUTE 161 RELATED USES ........................... .............................30 SUBAREA E SERVICES ZONE ............................................................ .............................32 SUBAREA F RETAIL CENTER .......................................................... ............................... 40 SUBAREAS F -1, F -2, AND F -3 RETAIL CENTER RELATED (RESTAURANT/FLEX OFFICE) .................................... .............................44 SUBAREA G MULTI- FAMILY .............................................................. .............................47 SUBAREA G -1 MULTI- FAMILY (REVISED) ......................................... .............................48 SUBAREA H CONDOMINIUM ( REVISED) ......................................... .............................51 SUBAREA I TRANSITIONAL AREA .................................................. .............................53 SU13AREA i SUBAREA K MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP (MAG) ............................ .............. GORDON FLESCH CO., INC ...................... ............................... 5,8 65 SUBAREA L SERVICES ZONE ........................................ .............................68 SUBAREA M CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ............................... .............................75 APPENDIX A SUBAREA F ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................ ............................A -1 APPENDIX B SUBAREA G -1 ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................ ............................B -1 APPENDIX C SUBAREA J ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................. ............................0 -1 APPENDIX D SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS .. ............................... D -I PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA STANDARDS (Revised 1/3/94, 11/7/94, 01/29/02, 02/08/10 The following Subarea Descriptions and Development Standards by subarea shall be made part of the Concept Plan and are further discussed and illustrated in the Subarea Plan. SUBAREA DESCRIPTIONS Subarea A Interchange Related (25.4 acres) Because of its location adjacent to a major freeway interchange, Subarea A may contain freeway oriented uses similar to the other two quadrants on the east side of the Route 161 at 1 -270 interchange and include hotels /motels, general office uses, corporate headquarters office or major institutional uses. Subarea B Post Road Related (42.0 acres) This area is characterized by its relationship with residential uses on the north side of Post Road and the need for a reasonable landscaped setback buffer between the residential uses and the proposed development. Subareas B -2/11-3 Homestead The development being proposed for this area is a mixed -use community. Homestead at Perimeter Center will be a condominium development with a small amount of commercial space integrated into a residential community. Within a condominium form of ownership all streets are private, and services such as trash pick -up, snow removal, exterior building maintenance, an lawn care are provided by the condominium association. This translates into less demand on public services. Within a condominium development the buyers will be purchasing individual dwelling and /or working units. Individual lots, as in a traditional single - family subdivision, do not exist. After a unit has been purchased, the condominium resident's association must approve any changes to the exterior of that unit, including additions or alterations to any buildings and any significant changes to the common areas. Subarea C Internal Orientation (74.4 acres) Uses within this subarea shall include a mix of commercial, office research and light industrial uses or uses that exhibit a degree of clean, quiet unobjectionable processing activities within an enclosed structure. These uses are more appropriate to Subarea C because of its internal relationship within the site. Subarea C -1 WD Partners: (24.6 acres) Uses within this subarea include office, research and laboratory, packaging and assembly, wholesaling, and light manufacturing. These uses are appropriate to this subarea due to the sizes PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT and nature of existing building found therein. Subarea D State Route 161 Related Uses Because of extensive State Route 161 frontage, uses within Subarea D are primarily freeway oriented, general office, corporate headquarters office and institutional uses, hotels and motels. Subarea E Services Zone (14.2 acres) Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planing /traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subareas F, F -1, F -2, and F -3 Retail Center (33.0 acres) This area contains a mix of retail /commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment typical in size to a community center. This self - contained area also has access on all sides creating an even distribution of traffic. (Revised 2/6/95) Subarea G Multi- Family (16.2 acres) As a buffer or a transition zone to the single - family area to the north (Post Road frontage), the multi - family area will have a unified, residential scale appearance with a limited density. Subarea G -1 Multi - Family (13.1 acres) This area contains high density multi - family development which serves as a transition zone between a retail /commercial community center to the west and lower density multi - family development to the north and east. Architecture of the buildings is to be consistent with the Perimeter Shopping Center (Subarea F) in its design, materials, architecture, detailing and overall quality. Subarea H Condominium (8.0 acres) This subarea may be used for multifamily condominium housing at a density of less than 7 units per acre. (Revised 11/7/94) Subarea I Transitional Area This zone will function as a transition zone between the retail uses of Subarea E (the service zone along Avery Road), and F, F -1, F -2, and F -3 (the retail mall) and the freeway oriented office area - Subarea D to the east. PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea K Gordon Flesch Co., Inc. (4.37 acres) Due to Subarea K's high visibility from state Route 161 /US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea K, but the use definition shall be expanded so that Gordon Flesch may operate within the new subarea. Subarea L Services Zone: (1.959 acres) Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planning /traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subarea M Children's Hospital: Due to Subarea M's high visibility from State Route 161/US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea M, except for the parking requirements which shall be modified due to the unique nature of Children's Close to Home Facility. - M -0. �- Subarea K Gordon Flesch Co., Inc. (4.37 acres) Due to Subarea K's high visibility from state Route 161 /US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea K, but the use definition shall be expanded so that Gordon Flesch may operate within the new subarea. Subarea L Services Zone: (1.959 acres) Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planning /traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subarea M Children's Hospital: Due to Subarea M's high visibility from State Route 161/US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea M, except for the parking requirements which shall be modified due to the unique nature of Children's Close to Home Facility. PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS General: If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Commerce District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commerce District. 2. The standards included herein shall not require modification of any structures, landscaping, or other improvements actually in place as a result of development occurring prior to this rezoning. Such structures, landscaping and improvements shall be considered permitted and legal and conforming uses at the location and to the size and degree they exist at the time of said rezoning. 3. Perimeter Drive will be constructed through to Wilcox Road as a part of the initial development phase of Subarea F, F -1, F -2, and F -3. The loop road through Area E, F, D shall also be constructed as part of the initial phase. At such time as the part of said Perimeter Drive is constructed through the Thomas property, the remainder of said Perimeter Drive from the east line of the McKitrick property to the west line of the Thomas property shall forthwith start and be completed within a reasonable time. The entire length of Perimeter Drive shall have a sidewalk along the southern right -of -way from Avery Road to Coffman Road. Nothing herein shall prohibit owner(s) from completing Perimeter Drive prior to the required completion period. If additional right -of -way is required for ramp widening, it shall be provided. The landscape buffer along the south side of Post Road shall be installed in its entirety from Avery Road to Wilcox Road with the beginning of construction on Subarea G, H, F or the construction of Perimeter Drive from Avery to Wilcox. With regard to the mound and landscaping required on the property along Post Road and owned by applicant Olde Poste Properties, the following schedule should apply: a. At such time as any parcel of said property along Post Road is developed, applicant shall complete the mounding and landscaping along the Post Road frontage of said parcel as a part of the initial phase of construction and maintain the same thereafter. b. In addition, if said applicant, prior to the completion of the mound and landscaping as required under a) hereof should develop lands lying north of Perimeter Drive (not at the date of this rezoning developed) with construction amounting to 100,000 square feet of building area or more, applicant will complete the entire mound and the landscaping between the mound and the Post Road right -of -way from Discovery Boulevard to the 4 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT east if the City of Dublin undertakes to water the landscaping elements until any or all parts of the Post Road frontage mound and landscaping are constructed in accordance with a) hereof. For these purposes, neither the planned day care center which is a permitted use at the northeast corner of Discovery Boulevard and the proposed loop street nor construction on the 15 -acre parcel owned by White Consolidated Industries shall be included within the said 100,000 square feet. The applicant shall be obligated to pay one -third of the cost of the improvement of Avery Road from the south right -of -way line of Post Road to the north right -of -way line of S.R. 161 according to plans approved by the City of Dublin if, and only if, the City of Dublin agrees to pay one -third of said cost, and one -third of said cost is assumed by those owning property on the west side of Avery Road, between Post Road and S.R. 161. Said improvement shall be undertaken and performed by applicant prior to the opening of any commercial use on applicant's property the subject of this rezoning if, and only if, the City of Dublin furnishes the applicant in money or required materials with its share of said costs at a time which reasonably meets applicant's construction and opening schedules.. In addition, applicant agrees to include within the improvement project that part of Avery Road (Muirfield Boulevard) from the south right -of -way line of Post Road to the present southerly terminus of the four land section of Muirfield Drive north of Indian Run if, and only if, the City of Dublin furnishes the applicant in money or required materials with the cost of said additional construction. Both applicant and the City of Dublin understand that appropriate contracts will be executed covering the construction contemplated herein. 4. The street plan shown on the plan is the general plan which will be platted and constructed. It is not, however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be produced, its precise location may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. A safe bike connection from Post Road to Perimeter Mall through areas G & H will be provided if the bikeway connection over S.R. 161 is made, a bike tie /link will be completed to Post Road from the proposed bike path in Area G, H to State Route 161 connection. 5. Signage and Graphics: DESIGN CRITERIA a. These criteria are written in conjunction with the Dublin Sign Code Chapter 1189. In areas of conflict, these criteria shall supersede the Dublin Sign Code. 61 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT b. Materials and Landscaping: (1) All signs with a base shall have the base constructed of the predominant material of the user building. (2) All signs mounted on pylons shall have landscaping around the base of the sign and around the pylons such that the pylons are not visible. All plantings shall be of an evergreen material (see Example E attached). The length of the pylons shall be limited to two (2) feet between the grade elevation and the bottom of the sign face. C. Dimensions of Sign: (1) Maximum area of sign face: 50 square feet per face, with a limit of no more than two faces per sign. (2) Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. (3) Maximum overall height: 8' -0" above top of adjacent street curb. Signs located on earthen mounds shall maintain conformance to 8' -0" maximum height above top of adjacent curb. (4) It is intended that the signs shall be generally rectangular in design with an approximately 3' to 5' height to length ratio. Specific designs for each user may be considered on their own merit as long as they follow these general guidelines. (See Exhibit A through E attached). d. Sign Graphics: (1) Graphic identification shall be limited to the site user's name, logo and street number. (2) The area of graphic images such as logos shall not exceed 20% of the sign face. (3) Street numbers shall be located in the lower corner of the sign face or base nearest the right -of -way. (4) The maximum height of any letter or number shall be 16 ". 6 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT e. Quantity: No more than one ground sign shall be permitted on any one lot or multiple lots if devoted to one specific use or user, except that, for buildings or uses having frontage on each of two public rights -of -way, two ground signs are permitted. Neither ground sign shall, by itself, exceed the maximum allowable area of 50 square feet for each face. f. Signs may: (a) be non - illuminated, (b) feature internally illuminated graphics or incorporate back -lit graphics. Only the sign graphics shall be illuminated. g. Signage setbacks from the right -of -way are as follows: (1) 10' -0" along Avery Road (2) 12' -0" along the south side of Perimeter Drive (3) 8' -0" in all other areas. h. Traffic and directional signs. shall be in conformance with Dublin Sign Code 1189.03. i. Within Subarea B, all signage shall be limited to the south side of all structures along Post Road. j . No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence. No wall murals shall be allowed. k. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. No roof signs shall be permitted, nor should a sign extend higher than the building. M. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. n. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site or "for sale" or "for lease" signs in accordance with Dublin Code 1189.03 (g). 6. Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated: 7 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut off type fixtures. b. All types of parking, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall - mounted cutoff fixture and shall be from the same type and style. C. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood, dark brown, black or bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28'. e. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. f. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. g. Direct or indirect glare into the eyes of motorists or pedestrians shall be avoided. h. All building illuminations shall be from concealed sources. I. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. j . Landscape lighting along Avery Road shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. 8 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea A - Interchange Related Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted in Subarea A: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Eating and drinking establishments. C) Hotels and motels. d) Institutional uses. e) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. f) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback from Perimeter Drive shall be 35' for all pavement areas and 75' for buildings. 2. Setback from 1 -270 and State Route 161 shall be 50' for pavement areas and buildings. 3. All other publicly dedicated local streets within Subarea A shall have a 25' pavement setback and 50' building setback. 4. Total ground covered by all buildings, except parking garages, shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 3. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. rf� VJ PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have an 80' right —of- -way with a 36' pavement width. All other publicly dedicated local access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 2. Direct traffic shall be discouraged from Post Road with curb cuts limited to existing access points. 3. Curb cut spacing shall be restricted to a minimum of 200' on both sides of Perimeter Drive with opposing curb cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, shall be screened from view by a material identical with the building. Mechanical equipment or other utility on the ground shall be screened from view by a wall, fence or landscape material. Landscaping: 1. Landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187. The area within the Perimeter Drive parking and building setback shall include a 3' - 4' landscaped earthen mound with street trees planted 50' on center and located within the R.O.W. line and planted F from the R.O.W. 2. Along S.R. 161, a 6' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted a minimum of one tree per 30' O.F.T.O. (trees may be grouped). 10 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea B - Post Road Related Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea B: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. C) Day care centers. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback from Post Road shall be 75' for pavement and 100' for buildings. 2. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 3. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Setback from Perimeter. Drive shall be 35' for all pavement areas and 75' for allbuildings. 5. Front yard parking setback for publicly dedicated local access streets shall be 25' for pavement and 50' for buildings. 6. A special angled setback shall be provided at Post and Perimeter Drive for landscaping. 7. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for structures within Subarea B shall be 35' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facility shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. 11 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Circulation: 1. Post Road shall remain a 60' right -of -way with all the local streets having a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. Post Road shall serve as a local access and not a through street. 2. Discovery Road shall have a 60' right -of -way. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of- way. 4. Curb cuts along Post Road shall be restricted to existing cuts only. At the time Perimeter Drive is constructed and ties into Venture Boulevard, the City of Dublin may require that the existing curb cut on Post Road at Venture Boulevard /Metro North Business Park be eliminated. 6. At the time Perimeter Drive is constructed and ties into Wilcox Road, the City of Dublin may require that the existing curb cut on Post Road at Wilcox Road be eliminated. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187. In addition, landscaping shall be provided within the Post Road setback and include a sodded or seeded mound with a mixture of ornamental, evergreen and shade trees. The mound shall be natural in appearance and vary between 130' and 150' in length, 30' to 50' in width and 5' to 8' in height. 12 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT With regard to the mound and landscaping required on the property along Post Road and owned by applicant Olde Poste Properties, the following schedule should apply: a. At such time as any parcel of said property along Post Road is developed, applicant shall complete the mounding and landscaping along the Post Road frontage of said parcel as a part of the initial phase of construction and maintain the same thereafter. b. In addition, if said applicant, prior to the completion of the mound and landscaping as required under a) hereof should develop lands lying north of Perimeter Drive (not at the date of this rezoning developed) with construction amounting to 100,000 square feet of build area or more, applicant will complete the entire mound and the landscaping between the mound and the Post Road right -of -way from Discovery Boulevard to the east if the City of Dublin undertakes to water the landscaping elements until any or all parts of the Post Road frontage mound and landscaping are constructed in accordance with a) hereof. For these purposes neither the planned day care center which is a permitted use at the northeast corner of Discovery Boulevard and the proposed loop street nor construction on the 15 acre parcel owned by White Consolidated Industries shall be included within the said 100,000 square feet. 2. Landscaped entry features shall be provided within the corner setbacks at Post Road Perimeter Drive. 13 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subareas B -2/13-3 -Development Standards Subareas B -2 & B -3 shall be a Planned Unit Development. The subareas shall comply with the general subarea development standards as contained in the original Perimeter Center zoning (general, signage and graphics, lighting and primary identification signage design criteria) unless otherwise indicated in this text or by the approved preliminary development plan. Permitted Uses: Subarea B -2: Within Subarea B -2 only residential and accessory uses are permitted. Residences are detached except for four locations shown on the preliminary development site plan, where two units share a garage wall. Subarea B -3: Permitted uses within subarea B -3 shall include: Residential Uses: These shall include single and multiple dwelling units, with a maximum number of 6 dwelling units per building. Some, or all, of the dwelling units may be configured in "Live /Work Buildings ". Commercial Uses: These shall be limited to: a) Homestead community facilities including community lounge, community cafe, community living room, community kitchen facilities, community sales offices, community fitness facilities, community maintenance office and facilities, and other uses covered by the condominium association fees. b) Small -scale general and professional offices. C) Small -scale studios for art, crafts, antiques, and photography where the sale as well as display of products is permitted. d) Small -scale real estate, insurance, and investment /financial advisors. e) A pedestrian-only, walk -up, building mounted ATM machine is permitted. f) No "drive -thru" facilities shall be permitted. Limitations on single tenant size: No single commercial tenant, other than The Homestead Community Facilities, shall exceed 1200 net usable square feet. 14 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Limitations on total amount of commercial space: The maximum number of parking spaces available for commercial use is 57. Of these spaces 6 are designated for The Homestead Community Facilities. The remaining 51 spaces will facilitate a maximum of 7,650 net usable square feet of commercially leaseable space. Definitions: Live/Work Building shall consist of a building with residential or commercial uses on the street level and residential or commercial uses on the upper level(s). Small -scale shall mean no greater than 1200 square feet of net leaseable space. Conditional Uses: Conditional uses shall not be permitted in subarea B -2. Conditional uses are required in subarea B -3 for all uses not expressly designated in the preliminary development plan. Uses which are not included in the initial condominium development statement must also be approved by the condominium association. Any consideration for conditional use must consider the proposed location and that the use will not adversely affect adjacent property and /or public health, safety, and general welfare. Conditional uses may include: 1. Small scale retail operation. 2. Small scale restaurants, ice cream shops, and similar food service operations. Lot Coverage: Percentage of lot coverage for the combined subareas B -2 & B -3 shall not exceed 75 percent. Yards and Setbacks and Building Separations: See Table 1 for building and pavement setback requirements. Table 1 Post Road Wal Street Metatec Boulevard Buildin Setback Pavement 100' -0" 100' -0" 40' -0" 15' -0" 50' -0" 25' - 0 " As otherwise noted above, the minimum perimeter building setback shall be 10' -0 ", the minimum building separation shall be 6'-0", and the minimum perimeter pavement setback shall be 10' -0" 15 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Height Requirements: Subarea B -2: Buildings in subarea B -2 shall be limited to two stories and 24' in height, as measured to the average height of the highest pitched roof from finished floor. Subarea B -3: Buildings in subarea B -3 shall be limited to two stories and 30' in height, as measured to the average height of the highest pitched roof from finished floor. Accessory Structures: Accessory uses and structures will be permitted in both subarea B -2 & subarea B -3, provided that they meet the following criteria: 1. The structure must be for use by all residents of the condominium associationl. 2. The area shall not exceed 400 square feet. 3. The architectural style and character must be consistent with the residential dwellings using similar scale, materials and colors. 4. The height shall not exceed 15 feet. 5. Permitted accessory structures shall be: A. Greenhouse B. Garden tool shed C. Gazebo D. Trellis /arbor E. Swimming Pool (Condominium association use only). Parking and Loading: The Dublin Zoning Code shall regulate all parking requirements. 2. Limited on- street guest parking will be permitted. Circulation: All public roads on the perimeter of these subareas are completed. Improvements are limited to curb cuts, aprons, utility connections, and landscape improvements or replacement. 16 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 2. Although proj ect streets are private, they will meet requirements of fire and police departments to assure access for emergency vehicles. 3. Project streets shall be a minimum of 24' in width (as measured from back to back of curb). 4. Service roads shall be a minimum of 12' in width to allow for limited traffic and no parking. 5. Driveways shall be a minimum of 9' in width. 6. Opposing curb cuts on Wall Street shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway centerline) or directly aligned whenever possible. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a fence or solid wall. The design shall be compatible with the adjacent buildings in materials and color. 2. Commercial tenant waste and refuse will be containerized and placed within a screened area enclosed on three sides by wall or fence that extends 1' -0" above the highest point of the container, and with an opaque gate on the fourth side. The design shall be compatible with the adjacent buildings in materials and color. Storage and Equipment: 1. Materials and equipment necessary for the functioning of buildings, such as condensing units, utility pedestals, etc., are permitted. 2. Materials, supplies, equipment or products not permanently installed shall not be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel or outside a permitted structure for more than 12 hours. 3. Except as provided for in "Accessory Structures," no materials, supplies, equipment or products may be permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel or outside a permitted structure. This shall mean that swing sets, personal above- ground pools, flagpoles, satellite dishes, radio antennae, and /or television antennae are not permitted. 4. Additional restrictions will be set forth in the condominium development statement and will be enforced by the condo association. 17 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Landscaping: All landscaping shall conform to all Code requirements regarding landscaping. Homestead at Perimeter Center will provide amenities to various groups of users. These groups can be identified as: residents of Dublin, residents of Homestead at Perimeter Center (common areas within the condominium), and for individual residents (limited common areas for each building). Amenities for Dublin and its residents: A. Improvements to existing 3.8 -acre pond: As shown on the "Preliminary Development Plan — Preliminary Landscape Plan," a significant amount of new plant material is being added around the south and east sides of the pond. Along the west side street trees are being added as well as re- seeding for grass. A pedestrian walking path will be constructed along the south and east sides of the pond, with four benches located along the path. The northwest end of the pond, which fronts the Live /Work center of the project, has a deck/overlook as well as a Pavilion overlook at the pond's edge. B. Post Road Frontage: Along Post Road will be a series of well fed ponds connected by streams that reduce in elevation from the western pond to the eastern pond. This step down in elevation will create small waterfalls that will be visible from Post Road. The existing bike path will be reconfigured to compliment the ponds and allow users of the bike path to enjoy the waterfalls and ponds. Along the small ponds will be two areas where stone steps will come down to the water's edge from the Village Greens within the community. At the center of the Post Road frontage there will be a "pedestrian bridge" over the streams that connects Homestead to the community bike path system and Post Road. 2. Amenities for residents of the Homestead Condominium. There are three major landscape and site amenities for the residents of Homestead at Perimeter Center: A. Improvement of the existing pond into a village center feature: As part of the village gathering space, an emphasis on integrating the pond into the community life of Homestead at Perimeter Center is achieved by creating the deck overlook, and the overlook pavilion, as well as locating the community swimming pool near the pond. Community fitness facilities will be housed on the street level of the northern "Live /Work" building along with the community center, which includes a living room and kitchen for parties, and a small lounge /cafe for small group meetings. B. Three village greens within the residential subarea: 18 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Village greens of different sizes and character are evenly dispersed along the Post Road frontage. Dwelling units surround each Village Green. Each will have a different character. The eastern village green is strictly pedestrian and has access to the waterfalls and ponds by stone steps that lead down to the water's edge. The center village green is more formal with a sculptural fountain at the south end of the green with access to the pedestrian bridge across the waterfalls and ponds to Post Road. The western green is planted more densely and has more homes facing the green. It also has stone steps down to the water's edge at northern end. C. Streets create vistas: We have arranged the streets so that views end in something special rather than going on forever. Small offsets have been created in the street pattern to establish a backdrop of beautiful landscaping and architecture for views down each street. While the offsets and greens may make the streets seem more difficult to maneuver, they create a sense of place and scale that is intimate and controlled. D. In the common areas along streets: As part of the condominium association there are "Common Areas" which will be under exclusive control of the condominium association. These areas will be landscaped and maintained by the association. This creates consistency and quality of the materials. The association will assure the highest quality of appearance and materials and will constantly maintain fences, gates, flowers, trees, shrubs and the exterior of all buildings. 3. "Limited common areas." Along the sides and rear of each dwelling unit there will be areas designated as "limited common areas." These are areas where residents can have their own landscaped areas, patios, or lawns. Within these limited common areas the association will maintain the grass, but the resident will care for any plant materials placed by the resident. Gardens are encouraged. A community greenhouse will promote early starts of flowers and other plants. A. Stone fences and /or wrought iron fences will enclose limited common areas and define private spaces for individual dwelling units. While there are no "Lot Lines" within the condominium development, private areas will be defined by using walls, fences, trellises, arbors, and small accessory structures. B. Walls & Fences: Walls and fences will be permitted around dwelling units to create private spaces and to define some boundaries between public and private areas. Each dwelling unit will have some sort of wall and /or fence to define private areas. The type of wall and /or fence will be selected from an approved palette of styles. 19 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Architecture: The design of the Homestead at Perimeter Center is intended to create a European village feel. Stone, stucco, beaded siding, stone fences, wrought iron fences, village greens, fountains, steps to waterfalls and ponds, and "winding" streets are all components that will create a unique sense of place. Subarea B -2: Residential At least four different house types will be offered for sale. They will include a single story ranch, a 1 -1 /2 story style and a two -story style. Each style will have standard options such as screened porches, sunrooms, and three -car garages. The houses will be oriented both parallel and perpendicular to the street, which would allow the same house to be built in close proximity but with a different orientation. Diversity and interest will be maintained by not allowing the same house in the same orientation to be built twice in a row. The developer will assign exterior colors to each home location to further assure diversity and compatibility. Materials: Facades: Manufactured stone (Ohio Limestone `Buff'). Cement Fiber Hardboard siding (Hardiplank) painted off - white, beige or gray. Wood trim (plytrim) painted white. Windows, vinyl single and /or double hung. Roof. Asphalt shingles. Roof slopes will be min. 6/12 to maximum 10/12. Subarea B -3: Live/Work The Live /Work area of the Homestead at Perimeter Center is intended to serve as a village center. The community facilities are located here and the small area of commercial activity is also here. The Live /Work buildings are intended to provide an opportunity for small business owners to utilize shop space at street level and to live in a condominium above their shop. It may also provide a place for businesses to operate in a small neighborhood setting with the residents above being unrelated to the business activity. These buildings will have details and texture on all four sides of the buildings, creating four -sided architecture. Materials: Facades: Manufactured stone (Ohio Limestone "Buff'). Brick (from the approved Perimeter Center Palette). Cement Fiber Hardboard siding (Hardiplank) painted off - white, beige, or gray. Wood trip (plytrim) painted white. Windows, vinyl single hung on upper levels. Wood Store -front at street level (compatible with store -front at Perimeter Center Retail). Roof. Asphalt shingles. Rear and Sides: Cement fiber hardboard siding with cultured stone. ►.1 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT The storefront system will be designed in a historic style using windows with mullions and raised panel details. The roof slopes shall be 6/12, 8/12,10/12, or 12/12 pitch depending on the pitch of the roof element. The rear areas of the development shall be given appropriate treatment so as to present a pleasant appearance to surrounding buildings. Graphics: All signs shall comply with the sign code unless varied by this text or accompanying drawings. A. Main entry identification signs: There shall be main identification signs for the project along Post Road, Wall Street, and Metatec Boulevard. 1. A total of three main entry identification signs shall be permitted. These shall meet the following criteria: a. Height not to exceed 6'. b. Width no to exceed 12 ". C. Maximum area of 50 square feet per sign face. d. No more than two faces per location e. Externally illuminated f. Sign base materials to be the same as those on the structures with colors to match. g. Area of sign base is not to exceed the area of the sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. B. Street signs and traffic regulation signs will meet the Dublin Code for dimensions and text styles. Colors shall be compatible with the structures. C. Retail /Commercial signage in Subarea B -3, the Live /Work Units signage shall comply with the following criteria: 1. All wall and projecting signage shall meet City sign code relative to permitted sign face area and wall signs shall not hang higher than 12' above finished floor. 2. Each tenant storefront shall be limited to one wall sign, and one projecting sign. Wall sign faces shall not exceed one square foot in area for each one lineal foot in store frontage, not to exceed 15 square feet. D. Subarea B -2: Maximum area for residential address and resident identification signs shall be 2 square feet. E. Subarea B -3: Maximum area for residential address and resident identification signs for detached units shall be 2 square feet. 21 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea C - Internal Orientation Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted with Subarea C: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Hospitals and clinics; other institutional uses without housing or overnight lodging capacity. C) Health care including ambulatory care, outpatient care and surgery, medical offices and ancillary distribution. d) Those uses listed in Section 1169.01(b). e) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. f) Limited manufacturing and light assembly activities such as: 1) Compact disc manufacture and distribution. 2) Electronics assembly. 3) "Clean room" manufacturing. 4) Other activity incidental to other permitted uses. 5) Packaging, assembly. 6) Warehousing and distribution incidental to other permitted uses provided such use does not comprise more than 25% of the gross building area on the premises except for multi- tenant buildings in which the average may be 50 %. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback from Perimeter Drive shall be 35' for all pavement areas, with 75' for buildings. 2. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 3. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 22 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4. All other publicly dedicated local streets within Subarea C shall have a 25' pavement setback and a 50' building setback. 5. Total ground covered by all buildings (excluding parking garages) shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for structures within Subarea C shall be 65' as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facility shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have minimum 80' right -of -way and a 36' pavement width. 2. Discovery Road shall have a minimum 60' right -of -way. 3. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 32' pavement width. 4. Curb cuts on Perimeter Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing curb cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. 23 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Landscaping: Landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code, Chapter 1187. 2. In addition, landscaping within the Perimeter Drive setback shall include a 3'- 4' landscaped mound with street trees planted 50' on center within the right -of -way and planted +l' from the R.O.W. line. 3. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28'. 24 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea C -1— WD Partners (02/08/2010) I. Summary The subject site includes 24.6± acres of real property located northwest of and adjacent to the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Discovery Boulevard. It consists of property, which prior to the date of this application, encompasses Subarea B -1 and a portion of Subarea C of the Perimeter Center PUD. The application seeks to rezone the property into a new Subarea C -1 to update the permitted uses on the site and enhance its marketability to a broader range of users. This rezoning also will allow for uniformity of use types across the development. The site is presently developed with two buildings. The applicant, WD Partners, currently occupies a portion of the northernmost building in the PUD. The building found on the southern portion of the site is currently vacant but, with proposed changes to its zoning classification as proposed herein, instantly will become much more viable as a destination for a high - quality user. II. Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. III. Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in the new Subarea C -1 of this PUD: (A) The permitted and conditional uses listed in Section 153.026 (Suburban Office and Institutional District) and 153.034 (Office, Laboratory and Research District) of the Dublin City Code, provided that conditional uses are approved in accordance with Section 153.236 of the Dublin City Code. (B) Basic and applied research conducted in laboratories and offices as well as associated research support activities such as cold rooms, glass wash and microscopy areas. (C) Packaging and assembly (D) Wholesaling (E) Manufacturing uses, including: (1) Light manufacturing of a low - intensity nature conducted in a manner and with a character that does not create significant negative impacts to the environment or surrounding area; PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT (2) Research, synthesis, analysis, development and testing, including the fabrication, assembly, mixing and preparation of goods, equipment and components; (3) Uses conducting research, design, engineering, testing, diagnostics and pilot or experimental product development, including automotive, electronic device, manufacturing, materials and alternative energy technologies; (4) Design, development, and production of computer hardware, and software, data communications, information technology, data processing and other computer related services, provided that any production is light in nature and does not create significant negative impacts to the environment or surrounding area; (5) Life science technology and medical laboratories, including biomedical engineering, biotechnology, genomics, proteomics, molecular and chemical ecology; and (6) "Clean room" manufacturing and /or laboratories, which shall mean uses that are operated in an indoor area containing minimal or no contaminants (such as dust or bacteria) and include production of precision parts or equipment and /or research. (F) Data processing and analysis (G) Warehousing and distribution (H) Ancillary commercial uses within the same building as another permitted use, provided that such commercial uses are intended to serve employees and tenants of that building IV. Conditional Uses All conditional uses require approval in accordance with Section 153.236 of the Dublin City Code. (A) The conditional uses listed in Section 153.026 (Suburban Office and Institutional District) and 153.034 (Office, Laboratory and Research District) of the Dublin City Code (B) Call centers V. Yard, Setback, and Lot Coverage Requirements. (A) Discovery Boulevard: The following minimum setbacks shall apply along Discovery Boulevard, as measured from the right -of -way: PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT (1) The minimum pavement setback shall be 25 feet. A small portion of parking /pavement shall be permitted to encroach a maximum of 5 feet into this required setback in the location shown on the attached preliminary development plan. (2) The minimum building setback shall be 50 feet, except that the minimum setback for a parking deck shall be 25 feet. (B) Post Road: The following minimum setbacks shall apply along Post Road, as measured from the right -of -way: (1) The minimum pavement setback shall be 75 feet. (2) The minimum building setback shall be 100 feet, except that the minimum setback for a parking deck shall be 75 feet. (C) Perimeter Drive: The following minimum setbacks shall apply along Perimeter Drive, as measured from the right -of -way: (1) The minimum pavement setback shall be 35 feet. (2) The minimum building setback shall be 75 feet, except that the minimum setback for a parking deck shall be 35 feet. (D) Holt Drive: There shall be a minimum pavement and building setback of 25 feet from the right -of -way of Holt Drive. A small portion of parking /pavement shall be permitted to encroach a maximum of 5 feet into this required setback in the location shown on the attached preliminary development plan. (E) Interior Parcel Lines: There shall be no minimum pavement or building setbacks from interior property lines in this subarea. (F) Lot Coverage: The maximum permitted lot coverage in this Subarea shall be 75 %. VI. Parking, Loading, and Circulation: (A) General Standards: Unless otherwise stated herein or otherwise approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, all parking and loading shall be regulated by City of Dublin Code Sections 153.200 et seq. (1) All loading activities and idling shall be limited to between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7p.m.; 27 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT (B) Circulation: (1) Post Road: Post Road shall maintain a 60 -foot right -of -way width and a 32 -foot pavement width. (2) Discovery Boulevard: Discovery Boulevard shall maintain a 60 -foot right - of -way width and a 32 -foot pavement width. (3) Perimeter Drive: Perimeter Drive currently has an 80 -foot wide right -of- way width and a 36 -foot pavement width. No additional right -of -way shall be required to be dedicated in conjunction with this development. Future right - of -way and pavement widths shall be determined by the Thoroughfare Plan and the City Engineer. VII. Waste and Refuse; Screening: (A) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be placed in containers and shall be fully screened from off -site view in accordance with the Dublin City Code. (B) Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain outside of a permitted structure. (C) Mechanical Equipment: Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious to the building(s) found in this Subarea. VIII. Landscaping: (A) General Standards: Except as otherwise stated herein, landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscape Code, Section 153.130 et seq. (B) Post Road Setback: Landscaping shall be provided within the required parking setback along Post Road shall include a sodded or seeded mound with a mixture of ornamental, evergreen, and shade trees. The mound shall be natural in appearance, shall be 130 feet to 150 feet in length, and shall vary between 30 feet and 50 feet in width and 5 feet to 8 feet in height. (C) Perimeter Drive Setback: Landscaping within the required pavement setback along Perimeter Drive shall include a 3 -to -4 foot high landscaped mound with street trees planted at an average distance of 50 feet on center. IX. Lighting: (A) Exterior Fixtures: Exterior light fixtures may be pole or wall mounted, shall be dark in color, and shall consistently utilize similar types and styles throughout this 28 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT subarea. (B) Light poles: Light poles shall be limited to a maximum of 28 feet in height. X. Architecture: (A) Design: Unless otherwise approved as a part of a final development plan, the buildings in this Subarea shall continue to be consistent with their respective designs as they exist on the date that this text is approved. (B) Roofs: Flat roofs shall be permitted in this subarea. (C) Building Height: The maximum height of structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the City of Dublin Code. (D) Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include brick/brick veneer (either exposed or painted), stone /synthetic stone, and split -faced block. The rear facades of buildings in this subarea shall be permitted primary exterior materials that include metal cladding /siding and split faced block. ►I] PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea D - State Route 161 Related Uses Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea D: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Corporate offices. C) Hotel and motel. d) Institutional uses. e) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. f) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback on Perimeter Drive shall be 35' for all pavement areas and 75' for buildings. 2. Setback along State Route 161 shall be 60' for all pavement areas and buildings. 3. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 5. All other publicly dedicated local streets shall have a 25' pavement setback and 50' building setback. 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. The maximum height for structures in Area D shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 65'. The maximum height may be extended if the structure is setback from both Perimeter Drive and State Route 161 right -of -way an additional 2' feet beyond the required setback for every 1 foot of height above the 65' maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures. Parking and Loading: 30 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Sizes, ratio, and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Bank drive -thru requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. Circulation: Perimeter Drive shall have a 80' right -of -way and a 36' pavement width. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 2. Ventura Boulevard shall have a 60' right -of -way. 3. The Loop Road shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 36' pavement width. 4. Curb cuts on Perimeter Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: All landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition and within the required building setback, a 3' - 4' earthen landscaped mound shall be provided along Perimeter Drive with street trees planted 50' on center and located +P from R.O.W. line with R.O.W. 3. Along S.R. 161, a 6' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted a minimum of 1 tree per 30' O.F.T.O. (trees may be grouped). 31 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea E - Services Zone (July 18, 1994) Subarea Development Standards: Subarea E shall comply with the general subarea development standards contained in the original Perimeter Center zoning (general signage and graphics, lighting and Perimeter Center primary identification signage design criteria) unless otherwise indicated in this text or in the submitted site plans. Subarea E: Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planning /traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subarea - Services Zone Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea E: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 (Suburban Office and Institutional District) and 1175.01 (Office, Laboratory and Research District) of the Zoning Code b) Those uses listed in Section 1163.01(a), (2), (5) (7) and (8), eating and drinking places. (Community Commercial District - Permitted Uses Only) C) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. d) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. e) Gas station. General: The Services Zone will function as a transition zone between the shopping center to the east and Avery Road, a primary entrance point to north Dublin on the west. The orientation and the face of the out parcels in the zone will be to the east and at the corners toward the intersecting streets and to what would normally be considered the rear of those parcels, (i.e. the portion abutting Avery Road will be employed as an entrance feature to the residential areas to the north). Avery Road will be employed as an entrance feature to the residential areas to the north). Buildings will have a common architectural theme with good aesthetic quality, the same or compatible building materials and a common lighting, signage and landscaping ethic. Within this mold the east and 32 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT intersecting streets face may identify the separate users and their products with appropriate expressions of individuality. However, the west face must appear as a unified, single expression. Structures, be they buildings or walls; roof lines and types; building spacing; signage, lighting and landscaping should present an almost non - commercial approach with low level signage employed solely to identify users with structures and landscaping effectively shielding the street from the impact of activity on the site. The following additional standards are deemed appropriate to produce such a function. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Avery Road, pavement setbacks shall be equal to 30', building setback equal to 50'. Signage setback shall be equal to 10' from the R.O.W. 2. Along Perimeter Drive, the south entry drive and the loop road, pavement setbacks shall be equal to 30' and building setbacks equal to 50'. 3. All area between the right -of -way of Avery Road and the parking setback shall be landscaped per approved plan. 4. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25' and building setback 50'. 5. At all public road intersections with Avery Road including Perimeter Drive and the south entry drive, a corner building and parking setback measured along a line bisecting the angle formed by the intersection of the required building setback lines shall be 50' for a 25' parking setback, 60' for a 30' parking setback and 100' for a 50' building setback (See Exhibit A). 6. Along S.R. 161, the setback shall be 50' for buildings and pavement. 7. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages and lots, shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. Utilities: 1. All utility lines including water supply, sanitary sewer service, electricity, telephone and gas, and their connections or feeder lines should be placed underground. 2. All utility connections should be kept to the rear or the side of the building, out of view or screened. 3. All mechanical equipment and related structures should be effectively screened from grade level view as well as on the site views from within the development. 4. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings 33 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Circulation: 1. Avery Road R.O.W. width and pavement section will be per approved engineering plan. 2. The Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' foot right -of -way and a 56' pavement width. 3. The south entry drive shall have an 80' foot right -of -way, and a 56' pavement width and taper to a 60' right -of -way beginning directly south of the intersecting north -south service road. 4. The loop road shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 36' pavement width. 5. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of- way and a 32' pavement width. 6. Opposing curb cuts on Perimeter Drive and the Loop Road shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible, consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Paving: 1. Asphalt paving for roads and parking areas. 2. Concrete curbs. 3. Concrete road paving as needed in service area. 4. Paint striping in parking areas and on roads should match color of that used for Perimeter Shopping Center. 5. Sidewalks should be minimum 4' -0" wide; paving material to be broom finish concrete. Parking: In addition to meeting the current City of Dublin code requirements, the following guidelines should be followed in the design of parking facilities: 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum 34 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT of eight spaces per exchange window. 3. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. 4. Parking stalls shall be laid out in the most efficient manner; 90 degree layouts are suggested with 9' x 19' stalls and 22' - 24' aisles. 5. All parking lots should be paved, curbed and internally drained. 6 Wheel stops should be used where sidewalks abut parking spaces, to prevent car bumpers overhang from blocking the sidewalks. 7. No parking shall be permitted on Perimeter Drive or Perimeter Loop Road. 8. One curb cut shall be permitted for each parcel. An additional combined curb cut shall also be permitted creating a maximum of three curb cuts for every two parcels. 9. Where slopes occur that exceed 3:1, the area shall be terraced or treated with erosion control materials, shrubs or ground cover. Materials which will roll, wash or float away are to be avoided on these slopes. 10. Full, compact, handicap and motorcycle parking spaces shall be provided. 11. If compact parking spaces are provided, they shall be grouped in rows as illustrated, rather than a few spaces spotted at several locations around the site. All compact spaces shall be 16' long x 8' wide. 12. Handicap parking spaces shall be 19' long x 12' wide. Handicap ramp access shall be included in conjunction with these parking spaces. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Service: 1. All loading activity shall occur within a building. 2. All refuse, trash and garbage collection shall be enclosed or not visible from the street or adjoining property. 3. No noises, smoke, odors, vibrations or other nuisances shall be permitted. 35 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4. No area of the site will be used for outdoor - storage. 5. Service courts and loading docks shall be screened from all streets by landscaping, mounding or walls. 6. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. 7. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition, landscaping within the Perimeter Loop Road setback shall include a continuous three -foot hedge with stone pilaster sixty feet on center with street trees planted 50' on center within the R.O.W. and planted +1 from the R.O.W. General Conditions: 1. As many existing trees as possible shall be preserved. 2. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking area is not constructed shall be landscaped. 3. Street trees on each side of an entry drive shall be set back twenty (20) feet from the curb to accentuate the entry /exit points. 4. A minimum green belt of ten (10) feet shall be maintained along each adjoining property line. 5. Shrub plantings are recommended massed or clustered in beds rather than singular shrub plantings. 6. Site unity can be maintained by specifying the same species of major landscape elements (shade trees, evergreen trees and ornamental trees). New compatible species of shrubs and ground cover will be introduced to the plant palette as needed to provide interest, focal points and screening around new development. Fence/Walls: No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. IR PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Signs and Graphics: Signs and graphics play an important role in the Perimeter Center Mall. In past years in the development of cities, little attention has been paid to signs and graphics or their impact on the environment. We do not want this to happen in the Perimeter Center area. Graphics: There shall be main identification signs for the out parcels on Perimeter Loop Road, Avery Road on Perimeter Drive: A. Dimensions of Signs: 1. Maximum area of sign face: 50 square feet per face. The sign will be internally illuminated with an opaque background and the color will be selected from the approved Perimeter Center palette of colors being dark blue, dark green, dark red and black, with a limit of no more than two faces per sign. 2. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. 3. Maximum overall height: 9' above top of adjacent street curb. Signs will be located on stone bases and shall not exceed 5 feet. 4. Logos shall be limited to 20 percent of each sign face. 5. A maximum of three colors per sign, excluding the background colors, are permitted. 6. No more than one ground sign shall be permitted on any one lot or multiple lots if devoted to one specific use or user, except that, for buildings or use having frontage on each of two public rights -of -way, two ground signs are permitted. Maximum height above grade shall be 9 feet. When two (2) ground signs are permitted for a corner lot the total maximum area of such sign faces shall not exceed 66.5 square feet. Neither ground sign shall, by itself, exceed the maximum allowable area of 50 square feet for each face. 7. Where more than one tenant occupies the building, there should be one sign identifying the name of the building only. 8. All building identification signs shall be freestanding, ground mounted, double faced and set perpendicular to the street frontage. 9. No major building identification signage shall be attached to the building. 37 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT B. Information Signage: 1. This category includes all information and directional signage other than identification which occurs on site. On site permanent direction signs, e.g. employee and visitor parking, deliveries, etc. will be of a common design material and size and must meet signage standards. 2. The height of the signage is designed such that the viewing panel is always visible for a person seated in an automobile for a maximum height of 3 -1/2' above grade. 3. All copy for informational /directional signage shall be kept flushed to the left without indentation. 4. In addition to signage, traffic control may be indicated via painted markings on pavements. Architectural: Height 1. No out parcel structure shall be more than 28' in height. For structures with pitched roofs, this height limit will be measured to the roof peak. 2. Building facade height, as measured from the base of the eave to the ground elevation, shall not vary by more than 2' between buildings. Color Palette 1. Earth tones, muted and natural tones are preferred. Accent colors in brighter hues are permitted for building accent features only such as awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. A mixed palette on a single building should be carefully selected so all colors harmonize with each other. Materials: 1. Warm -tone brick. 2. Stone veneer with limestone trim. (Limestone rubble in a coarse ashlar pattern.) 3. Cedar shakes /shingles with not less than 325 lb per square weight. 4. Split -face concrete block used as an accent with brick only. 38 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Roof 1. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 8/12. 2. Minimum 8" overhangs are required. 3. Glass roofs are acceptable in portions of a structure. 4. Mansard roofs are not permitted. 5. Flat roofs are not permitted. Scale 1. The scale of the structures should be sympathetic to a residential character. 2. Structures should be designed to harmonize with the landscape. 3. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses and other such elements which help break up the mass and bring it into a more residential character. Wall Articulation/Fenestration 1. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. 2. Blank facades on the "rear" of the building will not be permitted, however, articulating such facades with recesses, fenestration, fences, pilasters, etc. is encouraged. 3. The amount of fenestration should be balanced with the amount of solid facade. 4. With the exception of enclosed service corridors, the buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. 39 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea F - Retail Center (February 27, 1995) Subarea Development Standards: Subareas F, F -1, F -2, and F -3 shall comply with the general subarea development standards contained in the original Perimeter Center zoning (general, signage and graphics, lighting and Perimeter Center primary identification signage design criteria) unless otherwise indicated in this text or in the submitted site plans. Percentage of lot coverage shall be no greater than 80% in Subarea F. When Subareas F -1, F -2 and F -3 are combined, their total percentage of lot coverage shall be no greater than 75 %. Subarea F: The retail center will have a maximum total gross square footage of 176,500 with a maximum 85,000 square foot grocery store. The grocery store square footage is contained within the total gross square footage of 176,500. This retail center may be developed in phases. Servicing for the proposed center, upon completion of all phases, will be totally screened from view by passer- by traffic, and, until completion, temporary screening of the rear areas will be accomplished by mounding and by placing pine trees staggered fifteen feet on center along those spaces. This total screening height shall be fourteen feet at the time of planting from the elevation of adjacent drives or parking. Special attention will be provided to design of all elevations of the center to maintain an established architectural theme with good aesthetic quality throughout the development of the retail and services zone. The same or compatible building materials and a common lighting, signage and landscaping ethic will also be incorporated to blend with the surrounding proposed uses for total site compatibility. The first building to be constructed will be the Big Bear store and related shell shops. Future phasing will be controlled by market demand. The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea F: Permitted uses include uses permitted in the CC, Community Commercial District, and the SO, Suburban Office Institutional District. Conditional uses to include car rental, outdoor seating associated with an eating and drinking place, theaters, outdoor garden sales including garden centers, drive -in facilities associated with a permitted use and open display associated with a permitted use. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along the Perimeter Loop Road, pavement setbacks shall be 35', building setback 50'. 2. Along the Perimeter Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 35'; building setbacks 75'. 3. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25', building setback 50'. 4. Total building square feet for Subarea F shall not exceed 10,000 square feet per acre. M PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for buildings in Subarea F shall be 45' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 3. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. 4. "Landbank" areas will be designated in areas as shown on the accompanying maps, where parking, required by Code, may not be necessary at this time. These areas will remain unpaved and in a grassy state until it is deemed necessary by the City of Dublin or owner. Screening, required by Code, will be provided in either case. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' right -of -way, and a 56' pavement width. 2. The Perimeter Loop Road shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 36' pavement width. 3. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 32' pavement width. 4. Opposing curb cuts on Perimeter Drive and the Perimeter Loop Road shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure unless approved in association with a conditional use application. Outside storage in the pedestrian 41 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT spaces shall not be permitted, including grocery carts and retail goods, unless a conditional use permit is obtained from the Planning Commission. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition, landscaping within the Perimeter Loop Road setback, Perimeter Drive and Mercedes Drive shall include a continuous three foot hedge with stone pilaster fifty (50) feet on center with street trees planted fifty (50) feet on center within the R.O.W. and planted +1 from R.O.W. 3. Street trees for the subarea will be selected from Appendix E, Group A, of the Dublin Planning and Zoning Code. Architecture: The architectural design of the buildings shall be consistent with the architectural elevation plans submitted with this application. The development shall be constructed with the same architectural style and roof treatment with the exception of service corridors. The facade shall consist of brick and manufactured stone and the sloped roof shall be constructed of cedar wood shake shingles. The brick shall be selected from the approved Perimeter Center palette. The manufactured stone shall be "Ohio limestone (buff)" by manufacturer Carriage Hill Stone or approved equal and used throughout the project as a water table and as a facade treatment in select areas. The store front system shall be designed in a historic style using windows with mullions and raised panel details. The roof slops shall be 8/12, 10/12 or 12/12 pitch depending upon location of the roof element. The rear areas of the development shall be given special treatment so as to present an architecturally appropriate facade to the traveling public. The rear walls of the Big Bear Store and related shops and the flex - office structure shall be constructed of stucco or synthetic stucco in order to complement the architectural style found on the front facade and scoring and /or lights or other relief elements shall be used to break up the back of the center. The three (3) free - standing buildings (being designated as 8.4K, 12.6K, and 25K respectively) shall maintain the same architectural style and roofing as the main center on all four (4) facades. Screening to a height of six (6) feet shall be placed along the west property line of Subarea F -1 to provide additional screening for the north elevations of these buildings. Further, there shall also be a hedge of bushes along the front of the shopping center walkway similar to those along the rights -of -way within the subject area that shall provide continuity with the entire area and an architectural feature that enhances the appearance of the development. Brick pavers, scored concrete, benches, bollards and street lamps shall be incorporated into select areas of the walkway to provide variety and interest for pedestrian traffic. With the exception of service corridors that are screened, the buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. 42 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Graphics: All signs shall comply with the sign code unless varied by this text or accompanying drawings. A. Main Identification Signs There shall be main identification signs for the shopping center on Perimeter Loop Road and on Perimeter Drive: A total of two main identification signs shall be permitted, not to exceed 15 feet in height and 19 feet in width, with a maximum each of two sign faces, with a maximum area of 66 square feet per sign face, externally illuminated, with sign base materials matching the retail center materials and sign face materials and colors matching the retail tenant signage materials and colors, and with one such sign located at the northeast corner of Avery Road and Perimeter Loop Road and one such sign located at the Perimeter Drive entrance to the retail center. 2. Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. There will be no project identification sign located adjacentto SR 161/U.S. 33 as allowed by Item 5(b) of the original Perimeter Center Subarea Standards, dated February 9, 1988. B. The Perimeter Retail Center sign package shall meet the following elements: That all wall and projecting signage meet the City sign code relative to permitted sign face area and that wall signs not exceed 16 feet in height; 2. That each tenant store front be limited to one wall sign, one projecting sign and one awning sign. Wall sign faces shall not exceed one square foot in area for each one lineal foot in store frontage not to exceed 80 square feet. Projecting sign faces shall not exceed three square feet in area. 3. That each tenant shall have one (1) projecting sign of uniform size and design as illustrated by the accompanying drawing. Background color of projecting sign shall match background color of that particular tenant's wall sign. 4. That awing signs be permitted per code for property addresses, names of occupant and year business established, should not state product names or lines, tag lines, pictures of products, hours of operation or telephone or fax numbers, and provided such signs are limited to one square foot in area unless approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of a development plan and the color is complementary to the awning and wall sign; 43 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT That goose neck fixtures all be comprised of the same exterior finish and color, subject to staff approval; and 6. That the background color of wall signs, projecting signs and awning signs be selected from the existing Perimeter Center palette of trim colors or a compatible color approved by staff. With the exception of "Big Bear" letters and "Bear" logo, all wall and hanging signage shall have "gold" letters on dark colored background. Color backgrounds shall be selected from the approved Perimeter Center palette or a compatible or equal color approved by staff. The "Big Bear" letters and "Bear" logo shall be internally illuminated with "red" plastic faces. All awning signage shall be painted on the fabric. The signage colors shall be aesthetically compatible with the awning fabric. With the exception of "Big Bear" signage, the maximum height of all signage shall be 16-0" above finished walkway. Signage at "Big Bear" will be a maximum of 26' -0" above finished walkway. The grocery store wall signage, relative to sign face area and location, shall comply with the elevation as shown on the attached building elevation. Subareas F -1, F -2, and F -3: Retail Center Related (Restaurant/Flex Office) Permitted Uses: a) Subarea F -1: Eating and drinking establishment, bank, SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District, and single tenant retail uses. Conditional uses to include outdoor seating associated with an eating and drinking place, drive -in facility associated with a permitted use and open display associated with a permitted use. b) Subarea F -2: CC, Community Commercial; SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. Conditional uses to include outdoor seating associated with an eating and drinking place, theater, and drive -in facilities associated with a permitted use and open display associated with a permitted use. C) Subarea F -3: 1) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 (SO) and 1175.01 (OLR) of the Zoning Code. 2) Those uses listed in Section 1163.01 (CC Permitted Uses Only). 3) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. ., PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Perimeter Drive pavement setbacks shall be 35' and building setback 75' within Subareas F -1, F -2, and F -3. 2. Along Perimeter Loop Drive pavement setback shall be 35' and building setback shall be 50' within Subareas F -1, F -2, and F -3. 3. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25' and building setback 50'. 4. Total building square feet for Subareas F -1, F-2, and F -3 shall not exceed 10,000 square feet per acre. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for buildings in Subareas F -1 and F -2 shall be 45' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Drive -thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum of eight spaces per exchange window. 3. Bank drive -thru stacking requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. 4. "Landbank" areas will be designated in areas as shown on the accompanying maps, where parking, required by Code, may not be necessary at this time. These areas will remain unpaved and in a grassy state until it is deemed necessary by the City of Dublin or owner. Screening, required by Code, will be provided in either case. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' right -of -way, and a 56' pavement width. 2. The Perimeter Loop Road shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 36' pavement width. 3. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 32' pavement width. 45 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 4. Opposing curbcuts on Perimeter Drive shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition, landscaping within the Perimeter Drive, Perimeter Loop Road and Mercedes Drive setback shall include a continuous three foot hedge with stone pilaster fifty (50) feet on center with street trees planted fifty (50) feet on center within the R.O.W. and planted +1 from R.O.W. 3. Street trees for the subarea will be selected from Appendix E, Group A, of the Dublin Planning and Zoning Code. Graphics: No more than one ground sign shall be permitted on any one lot or multiple lots if devoted to one specific use or user, except that, for buildings or uses having frontage on each of two public rights -of -way, two ground signs are permitted. Maximum height above grade shall be 9 feet. When two (2) ground signs are permitted for a corner lot the total maximum area of such sign faces shall not exceed 66.5 square feet. Neither ground sign shall, by itself, exceed the maximum allowable area of 50 square feet for each face. Architecture: Architectural standards as presented in Subarea F shall apply herein. PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea G - Multi- family Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea G: Multi- family units at an overall net density of twelve units per acre. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Perimeter Drive pavement setbacks shall be 30' and building setback 50'. 2. All other local public rights -of -way pavement setbacks shall be 25' and building setbacks 50'. 3. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for buildings in Subarea G shall be 45' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Code Chapter 1193. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' right -of -way and a 56' pavement width. 2. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 3. Curb cuts on Perimeter Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing curb cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. 47 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. Along both sides of Perimeter Drive, a 3' - 4' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted 50' on center and located within the R.O.W. planted +1' from the R.O.W. 3. Buffering shall be provided between the multi - family units and any residential area to include lots along Post Road. The minimum 60' wide landscaped buffer will consist of mounding to an approximate height of 3' - 4' with deciduous /evergreen landscape material installed to a summer opacity of 75% taken 6' above grade. Architecture: All buildings will be finished with natural materials (brick, wood, stone, stucco) and shall be of earth tone colors. Roofs shall have a pitch no flatter than 6:12 and shall use dimensional asphalt shingles. Subarea G -1 - Multi-Family (Revised November 21, 1996) Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea G -1: Multi - family units at an overall density of fifteen (15) units per acre. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Along Perimeter Drive pavement setbacks shall be 35' and building setback 75'. 2. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 48 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Maximum height for buildings in Subarea G -1 shall be 45' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. The appropriate parking ratio shall be determined at final development plan. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' right -of -way and a 56' pavement width. 2. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 3. Opposing curbcuts on Perimeter Drive shall be offset no less than 100' (as measured from the driveway ❑ s centerline) or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practices, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Waste and Refuse: All waste and a refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition, landscaping within the Perimeter Drive and Mercedes Drive setback shall include a continuous three foot hedge with stone pilaster fifty (50) feet on center with street trees planted fifty (50) feet on center within the R.O.W. and planted + 1 from R.O.W. Signage & Lighting: All signage and site lighting shall comply with Dublin code (but not the design guidelines), subject to staff approval. ., PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Architecture: The architectural design of the buildings shall be compatible with the Perimeter Shopping Center (Subarea F) and as illustrated on plans dated October 30, 1996, and elevations dated September 17, 1996, prepared by David Benjamin Meleca. Apartment Buildings & Clubhouse All buildings will be finished with brick, wood, manufactured stone, and stucco, and roofs shall have a pitch no flatter than 6:12 and shall use wood shingles to ensure compatibility with the Perimeter Shopping Center (Subarea F). Detached Garages All detached garage buildings backing onto the service corridor of Perimeter Center will be finished with a dimensional asphalt shingle to match, as close as possible, the wooden shingles in color and texture, a clay colored vinyl siding to match the dryvit portions of the main buildings, and dark green garage doors. Reversion: If construction activity has not commenced one year after zoning takes effect, then the parcel shall revert back to its previous zoning, as described within the Perimeter Center Development Text, revised February 6, 1995. 50 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea H -Condominium (Revised Nov. 7,1994: Ordinance 77 -94, Case Z94 -008) Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea H: Residential condominiums units at a net density not to exceed 7 units per acre, plus clubhouse and swimming pool. Yard Setback Requirements:: 1. Along Perimeter Drive, pavement setbacks shall be 30' and building setback 50'. 2. Building and pavement setbacks along Wilcox Road shall be 25' as provided in the recorded plat of Perimeter Center. There shall be no curbcuts for vehicular access to Wilcox Road. 3. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. Maximum height for buildings in Subarea H shall be 45' as measured per Dublin Zoning Code. Parking and Loading: 1. All parking and loading shall be regulated by the Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. At least one parking space shall be required per dwelling unit, excluding infirmary type beds. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 100' right -of -way and a 56' pavement width. 2. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 3. Curb cuts on Perimeter Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing curb cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. 51 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of a parcel outside a permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: All landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Landscaping Code Chapter 1187. 2. Along Perimeter Drive, a 4' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted 50' on center and located within the R.O.W. planted +1' from the R.O.W. line. 3. A landscape mound to an approximate height of 3' to 4' shall be provided between this subarea and the multifamily area (subarea G) to the north. It will include deciduous /evergreen landscape material installed to a summer opacity of 75% taken 6' above grade. Architecture: All buildings shall be finished with natural materials (brick, stone, wood or stucco). Buildings shall be of earth tone colors and blend harmoniously with adjacent multi - family development. 52 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea I - Transitional Area The Transitional Nature of Subarea I: The area proposed for Subarea I was contemplated to be general office, corporate headquarters, hotels, etc. It was further contemplated that this site would form an important part of the entrance impression of not only Perimeter Mall but Dublin itself. Because of specific high quality retail use fulfilling this purpose, the original concept for Perimeter Center was altered to allow creation of Subarea I permitting automobile dealerships under strict development standards, in addition to the standards set out for Subarea D. Subarea I will additionally serve as an architectural transition, incorporating elements of the Perimeter Mall, while at the same time easing into the higher scale uses of Subarea D, where common architectural themes are not contemplated. Interrelationships of Rezoning and Development Plan: To create the new Subarea I, a rezoning was necessary. This rezoning is agreed by the initial end user of Subarea I (the Mercedes automobile dealership), the City, and the developer of Perimeter Mall to be specifically conditioned on the development plan presented for the parcel and the rezoning and development plan are presented concurrently. It is further agreed that a simple rezoning to a retail use for this parcel would be inappropriate. In effect, the rezoning amounts to a variance; the development plan, the architecture, building materials, and development standards of the specific rezoning and development plan proposal presented are integral parts of the rezoning. Taking all of these matters together, the particular retail use presented at the time of the rezoning of Subarea I is appropriate for this site. However, it does not follow that any other use deviating in any respect from the development plan presented would be appropriate for the site. It is a condition of the rezoning of Subarea I that any future use of Subarea I must meet the requirements set out in this text. Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea I: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Corporate offices. C) Hotel and motel. d) Institutional uses. e) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. t) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. g) Use listed in Section 1163.01 (a) (3) (551). New car dealer, developed to provide 53 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT a retail -to- office transition and in accordance with, accompanying standards. Development Standards for Automobile Dealerships: The development shall be limited to the highest caliber auto dealership which shall exhibit an extraordinary visual quality. Construction shall be limited to one building which does not exceed 44,000 square feet in area. Auto display, sales and service, shall be permitted and may not include a body shop, or storage of damaged vehicles or other activities which may detract from the higher visual quality intended here. This site will be treated as an important gateway into Dublin and the design will reflect both high quality and a coordination with surrounding development. No automobile bodywork permitted on site. No damaged automobiles stored outdoors on site. Automobiles stored outside of buildings and awaiting sale are limited to number of approved parking spaces, and may be displayed in single rows only; i.e., automobiles may be displayed nose to tail or side to side, but not both. Display pad areas outside of parking areas are not included in foregoing requirement, providing same is finished with concrete, brick pavers or other permanent material and is located behind building setback line. No outside loudspeakers permitted. No balloons, banners, flags, blimps or helium air devices or similar devices, may be used on site for any purpose. All building materials must be of equal quality all four sides. Display information on vehicle not a part of the vehicle itself is limited to stickers required by federal or state law and in addition, one additional sticker not larger than 3 by 6 inches, not an iridescent color, and listing the year and type of car. There will be no slogans, prices or other information painted or added to the windows, either on the interior or exterior side, of automobiles held for display on site. No loading docks are permitted on site. All curb cuts on public streets shall require brick pavers or concrete finished in a brick pattern at point of entry into site. Treatment of hazardous materials on site: Waste oil and waste anti- freeze must be stored above ground in concrete vault within the primary structure. 2. All hydraulic lifts shall use only biodegradable vegetable oil as a hydraulic medium, or future EPA approved material. 3. New (as yet unused) oil will be stored above ground indoors within the building. 4. No automobile gasoline or diesel fuel storage tanks will be permitted on site, for the purpose of fueling autos. 54 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Mechanical: All mechanicals must be so located or screened so as to not be visible by automobile from either State Route 33, the exit ramps to Avery Road, Avery Road, or the interior roads of the center. Architecture: All buildings shall be designed to reflect the architectural elements of Perimeter Mall and reflect the image and scale of an office building. Materials must be complementary and compatible with the mall as determined by the Dublin Planning and zoning Commission. This standard does not require exact duplication of the themes, materials or elements of the mall. The goal is to achieve total site compatibility within Perimeter Center. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback along Perimeter Loop Drive shall have a 25' pavement setback and 50' building setback. 2. All other publicly dedicated local streets shall have a 25' pavement setback and 50' building setback. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: The maximum height for structures in Subarea I shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 65'. A minimum height of 20' shall be required for all primary structures. Parking and Loading: 1. Sizes, ratio and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. Development plan will reflect Phase I and Expansion Layout for parking. 2. Bank drive -thru requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. 55 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Circulation: 1. Perimeter Loop Road shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 36' pavement width. 2. Curb cuts on Perimeter Loop Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Storage of automobiles displayed for sale is regulated by specific requirements for automobile dealerships. See Development Standards. Landscaping: 1. All landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187. 2. In addition and within the required building setback, a 3'- 4' earthen landscaped mound shall be provided along Perimeter Drive with street trees planted 50' on center and located +1' from R.O.W. line within R.O.W. 3. Along SR 161, a 6' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted a minimum of 1 tree per 30' O.F.T.O. (trees may be grouped). 4. Street trees shall be planted along Perimeter Loop Road. Trees shall be planted one (1) per 30' along the R.O.W. (trees may not be grouped). The minimum caliber shall be 3" per tree. Signage: Signage shall be in accord with Dublin Code and the Development Standards contained in general section of text. The signage for the initial automobile dealership use of this subarea may include an architecturally integrated pylon sign within the display area. A second ground sign, not to exceed Code Standards and consistent with other signs for the Mall, may be used for identification at the driveway. 56 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Lighting: General standards for lighting are contained in the general text. Lighting for automobile dealerships must comply with the general standards. Further, lighting for automobile dealership display if of a higher intensity than surrounding parking lot lighting must make a smooth transition to lower intensity lighting on surrounding uses. Applicants for this type of land use must show specific fixtures to be used and specifications, and further must provide lighting engineering plan showing actual intensities of light falling on illuminated areas and cutoff areas. Higher intensity display lighting may be used only in association with sales activity, limited to the hours of the showroom operation. A secondary lower intensity lighting level consistent with the adjacent parking lot(s) will be used at other times. If fixtures selected for surrounding uses in Perimeter Center are not suitable for lighting for automobile dealerships, then similar and visually compatible designs must be used. Fixture finish and color will be the same as Perimeter Center standard. 57 PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT - , v) speeial events an an oeeasional basis, utilizing the site for > > eivie meetings or similaf efi4ei4ainment or assembly uses. 58 (To Be Deleted) s rzvm� ­1101 W. M ............ w "" . - - , v) speeial events an an oeeasional basis, utilizing the site for > > eivie meetings or similaf efi4ei4ainment or assembly uses. 58 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT mnp.qn M O I R S MUM WrIffm 59 (To Be Deleted) F - ! i mnp.qn M O I R S MUM WrIffm 59 (To Be Deleted) - ! i 11 M i" •l L�f n mnp.qn M O I R S MUM WrIffm 59 (To Be Deleted) - ! i mnp.qn M O I R S MUM WrIffm 59 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT I o u -m-, m - a z 60 (To Be Deleted) 11011m 0101. N WIN 60 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT imp -- - - - MR. 61 (To Be Deleted) .�eve�!re[eeerr�zeerrt � r • ■ ERRIM s - MR. 61 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT ■- - - - - - - - 1 - 62 (To Be Deleted) - .■ - -- - - -- _ - 1 - 62 (To Be Deleted) ONIONSKIN WN - -- - WE - - - ' - ■ r ■ - 1 - 62 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT .. 63 (To Be Deleted) - RA- .s.z. mi .. 63 (To Be Deleted) - - .s.z. .. 63 (To Be Deleted) PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT OWN M \ 1 I UUMMUN-1-1 0 64 (To Be Deleted) APPROVED PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA MAP PROPOSED PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA MAP To Be Deleted The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: DRAFT 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the MAG auto dealership campus and a building addition. This site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning and preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend City Council approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high - quality design of an existing business, and meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; 6) That the development text be modified to restrict the use of the car wash to employees only; 1y ; 91 illMMED TO COUNCIL Page 1 of 2 U - O FOR MEETING ON-21--40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN,. Land Use and JANUARY 21, 2010 Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/ TDD: 614 -410 -4600 Fax: 614-410-4747 Web Site: www,dublin.oh us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: DRAFT 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the MAG auto dealership campus and a building addition. This site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning and preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend City Council approve this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high - quality design of an existing business, and meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; 6) That the development text be modified to restrict the use of the car wash to employees only; 1y ; 91 illMMED TO COUNCIL Page 1 of 2 U - O FOR MEETING ON-21--40 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 21, 2010 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan 7) That the development text be modified to permit internally illuminated campus identification signs (A & B) and clarified regarding administrative approval for sign faces for the brand and campus identification signs only; and 8) That the development text be modified to eliminate language allowing landscape screening to be deferred. *Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning /Preliminary Development plan was recommended to City Council for approval. MOTION #2: To approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, preliminary development plan, the applicable review criteria and existing development standards within the area with six conditions: 1) The plans be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement; 2) Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161/US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text; 3) The directional Sign S be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs: 4) The Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a brand ground sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to coordinate with the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 5) That the plan be modified to require that the landscape screening along the eastern property line be installed with the building construction; and 6) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. *Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 7 6. Perimeter Center PCD, MAG Volvo Expansion 6325 Perimeter Loop 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Ms. Amorose Groomes swore in the applicants, Ben Hale, Smith and Hale, and John Oney, Architecture Alliance, representing MAG, and those wishing to speak in regards to this case, including City representatives. Claudia Husak said this is a request for recommendation of approval to City Council for a rezoning with a preliminary development plan for 15.67 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development district (Perimeter Center Subarea J -1) to a new PUD to accommodate an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) site. She said the proposed development includes a substantial building addition, a car wash and other related site improvements for this auto dealership site. Ms. Husak said this also a request of review and approval of a final development plan which includes all final details concerning architecture, landscaping, site improvements, lights, signs and other details for this building addition. She showed a slide of the vicinity of the site and said the most recent application the Commission reviewed in this area was for the WD Partners site where the two subareas were combined into one. She said the case is scheduled for the first reading for City Council on January 25, 2010. Ms. Husak highlighted the different subareas within the Perimeter Center PCD and said that the MAG site is in the southern portion of the district in Subarea J, which was created in 1998 specifically for MAG. She said there were several amendments which were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and there was a building expansion and skywalk which would all be void with this application. She said Subarea J -1 was rezoned last year for a temporary parking lot during an anticipated expansion, but as the needs of MAG have changed, it causes the need for a rezoning. Ms. Husak said MAG is proposing to create a new Planned Unit Development district, which is the 15.69 acres. She said the redevelopment requiring this rezoning is generally located on the southeastern portion of the site. She said the site includes frontage on US 33, Perimeter Drive, Perimeter Loop Road and Venture Drive. She said that the site includes two buildings, a 7,000 - square -foot building that accommodates the Land Rover franchise to the north and a 68,500 - square -foot building that incorporates the administrative offices and includes all the other franchises that MAG operates in the southern portion of the site. Ms. Husak said that the car display is unique to the site and designed in a finger -like arrangement in the western portion of the site, to the north, and to the south. She said the proposal includes the new building addition that is intended to house the Volvo franchise, the service area for Volvo and expanded administrative offices. She said it is a 46,800- square -foot building addition. She said this is a four -story building that will be located at the southeastern end of the existing building and will continue to use the existing architectural design with pod areas made out of glass protruding from the front of the building. Ms. Husak said the building includes a lower level for services and there is a single executive residential suite proposed on the fourth floor of the building for the owner to reside in while in Ohio. She said there will be a formal landscape and entrance area located at the southeastern Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 7 corner and there is a carwash facility proposed just to the north of the building expansion, which currently operates on the MAG site but interior to the building. She said the renovations and expansions now require the carwash to be located on the exterior but it is only open to cars being serviced at MAG. Ms. Husak said all the sales activities are located on the main level of the building. She said the building is obviously unique and the height will increase with the addition of the building. She said the development text for MAG has requirements for striking and noteworthy architecture, and this particular design scheme is unique to the City. She said the additional height meets the development text as it existed prior to the rezoning and will continue with this new development text. Ms. Husak said the 1998 development text referred a lot of the development details and deviations from Code to the development plan. She said Planning asked the applicant to rewrite the development text to reflect the current standards and requirements. She said Planning has worked diligently with the applicant to accomplish the task. Ms. Husak said lighting will be the same as it is on the site today with matching fixtures, pole heights and lamps. She said there are some deficiencies in the landscape plan as it was submitted for interior landscaping and additional trees. She said there is an intention of the BMW and Mini dealership, currently located on Post Road, to this area. Ms. Husak said it is important to note that some of the screening is allowed to be deferred for three years if nothing were to occur to the east of the site. She said requirements were waived in the existing text for signs on the site and Planning worked with the applicant to develop standards which would govern the signs in the future, but will allow the existing signs to remain. She said there are several different sign types outlined in development text which are the campus development location signs, one on the highway to the south and the other two at the site entrances, there are also the brand signs on the site as well as directional signs to navigate the site for customers. Ms. Husak explained that two motions will be required for this application, one for the rezoning with the preliminary development plan and one for the final development plan. She said that Planning has evaluated both proposals using the review criteria and is recommending that the Commission recommend approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary development plan with the following four conditions: 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 7 Ms. Husak said that Planning has determined that the proposal meets the Final Development Plan review criteria and recommends approval of that part of the application with the following five conditions: 1) The plans be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement; 2) Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161/US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text; 3) The directional Sign S be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs; 4) The Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a brand ground sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to coordinate with the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 5) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. Ben Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Smith and Hale, representing the applicant, said the campus identification signs are internally illuminated, not externally as indicated in the text. He said the reason this building grew was because of the need for additional office space when Volvo moved to this location. He said the existing office space is on the north end of the building which is going to be converted to a showroom. Mr. Hale said the owner wants to stay on the top floor where a small apartment is located; the primary part of the building is actually three stories. He said the owner is trying to match the existing architecture of the existing building. He said BMW will need to leave the Post Road location and the preference is to move to the east of the site. John Oney, Architecture Alliance, said Mr. Brentlinger, the owner, has been involved in the design of the campus and the crescent shape of the building is being kept. He said the lower level is identical to what is happening with the service reception area and there will be a private elevator which would go up to the penthouse suite. He said the showroom level matches the designs to make it ADA accessible. Mr. Oney said there is hope to connect to BMW with either a pedestrian walkway or a sky bridge. He said the third level will be the corporate office which will house sixteen brands, located above the showrooms. He said the penthouse level will have a suite for Mr. Brentlinger to access and there will be a green roof garden feature in the back. He said they would like to create a screen which would not disturb the view with a building. Mr. Oney showed a video animation of the proposed addition and how it relates to the exisitng building and the overall MAG campus. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there were any comments from the public concerning this application. There were none. Ms. Kramb said she does not have a problem with the architecture but does have concerns about the development text. She asked if it was mentioned that the references needed to be removed from the Perimeter Center text. Ms. Husak said it is Condition 4 for the preliminary development plan. Ms. Kramb said the Perimeter Center Development has a lot more text about lighting for MAG than the proposed text. She said another concern is the residential area above the business. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 7 Ms. Husak said that Planning has received many inquiries from owners wanting suites within their business so they have a place to stay while in Ohio. She said the Code does not address this issue. Ms. Kramb said this is not a little apartment, it is large residential area. Mr. Walter said he is concerned the architecture of the carwash is uninspired and very close to the road. He said there are mixed window treatments which are interesting, but the materials of metal are not repeated. Mr. Oney said it is cinder block efts and the scoring of the material is on the back of the building. He said they tried to blend it in and add a strong landscaping screen to the street side, as well as add more glass. Mr. Walter asked if there is anything within the text which would preclude changing the material on the existing sign on the express way side of the building. He said the stone is out of place with the rest of the building. Ms. Husak said they could change th6- material, the text requires it to be a ground sign. Ms. Kramb said there is a provision in the text that signs do not have to ,come back to the Commission for approval. Ms. Husak said as long as the requirements" - . ' at,&-.. met for the development text. Ms. Kramb said it is in reference to a sign permitting process which is not referenced anywhere else and is not explained. She said it states signs maybe changed without further a due by the Planning Commission provided the new panels conform with this text with the sign permitting process. Aaron Underhill, Smith and Hale, said the intent is the make sure that if the brands change the panels can be updated to reflect the change without having to come back to the Commission. He said if the language needs to be changed it will be changed. Ms. Kramb said to change the language needs to reflect brand signs specifically. Ms. Husak said it says sign panels that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs. Ms. Kramb said that the categories of signs should be listed. Mr. Walter said another concern is that the addition removes a service parking area that is currently there. He said the need for adequate parking on this site is not addressed, the carwash is going to further eliminate parking. He asked if it is a possibility to have overflow parking in the J -1 area. Ms. Husak said the parking meets the Code requirements and actually exceeds them. She said J -1 could still be used for parking and would require approval by the Commission for conditional use and a final development plan. Mr. Walter asked where the trees for the landscape package will be located. Ms. Husak said they are along the SRI 61 frontage. Mr. Walter said he is not in support to adding the trees because they might impede the view, the intent is to mirror the rest of the building, but it might end up being the center of the building. He said he would rather not have those trees there. Mr. Hardt said a building of this size is dependent of the detailing. He said the garage door on the west elevation of the carwash is not the same as the others. He said getting the materials to match the existing building are important. Mr. Hardt said he does not have a problem with the carwash. He said the presence of the residence is okay, he does not like that the apartment creates an increase in size by a full story. Mr. Hale said the building does not exceed the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 7 approved height. He said the applicant is not asking for the site to be rezoned as residential, just for one residential unit. Mr. Oney said the glass and showroom feeling on the first floor will carry up to the second floor. He said the height will be 47 feet 10 inches, the allowable in the text is 65 feet. He said they tried to compress everything as much as they could. Mr. Zimmerman said if someone is building a business and wants to reside there they should have the ability to do so. He said the carwash blends with the building, the landscaping is going to cover it up. Mr. Fishman asked if the signs will remain the same and if the only change will be the brand name. He asked if any logos will be changed without approval by the Commission. He said there is going to be congestion having 16 dealerships using one carwash. Ms. Husak said the development text says the carwash is not permitted to be used by the public. Mr. Hale said the carwash is only for cars which are being serviced at this dealership and only employees can take the cars through. Mr. Fishman asked if the text states that an apartment will be allowed at this location. Ms. Husak said yes. Mr. Hardt asked if the applicant wants the ability to change the sign panels of the existing signs without coming back for approval. He clarified that the applicant is not asking to add more signs or change the design of the signs. Mr. Underhill said that is correct. He said this would apply to the signs at the entry way, the brand signs identify the individual manufacturers. Mr. Walter said number seven on page two, says the dealership is not charging for the carwash, but there can still be public access. He said that the phrase needs to be clearly worded. Mr. Taylor asked what happens to the balance of J -1 and D when it is absorbed into the new subarea. Ms. Husak said both stay within the Perimeter Center. Mr. Taylor asked if J -1 is smaller. Ms. Husak confirmed. Mr. Taylor said it does not feel like a four -story building and it has been interesting how this has evolved and he recalls discussions the Commission had about the potential BMW building moving to J -1. He said he appreciates how BMW integrates with this building. He said J -1 was supposed to hold construction parking and asked where the overflow parking is going to be placed when this addition is under construction. Mr. Oney said this expansion will have very minimal disruption to the existing site. Mr. Taylor said to make sure this gets addressed immediately if parking is needed. He said the building will not look like it was added onto it will look like it was designed this way. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she is disappointed the landscape installation has been deferred for up to three years; that is three growing years. She said she would like to see the landscape package go in during construction. She said she would like to see the lighting text amended, it is important and would not be a hardship on anyone to continue the same language from the lighting text into this rezoning. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would like to encourage the applicant to look across the street where cars can be stored. She said the carwash is located in a Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 7 tight corner, and asked whether there is anywhere else it can go. She said the first thing people will see entering from Venture Drive is a carwash, and there are gorgeous buildings but the first thing seen is a carwash. She said the applicant has done a great j ob with the architecture, and ask that the applicant take a look at moving the carwash as the site develops. Mr. Fishman said he is also concerned about the landscaping not being finished. Mr. Hale said BMW needs to be under construction within a year. He said if permission is obtained to move to the Volvo location the landscaping would have to be removed. He said if BMW has not been started within a year the applicant will put in the landscaping. He said if it must put it in now they will, but would like a year. Mr. Hardt said if that timeframe holds, approval for the building will need to be obtained before the landscaping being referenced today is planted. Ms. Amorose Groomes said if the applicant puts the landscaping in and asks for relief the Commission will give relief at that time. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the lighting text will be updated to reflect the original text. Mr. Hale said the lighting will be in compliance. Ms. Husak said conditions have been drafted and will address everything discussed. She said that the Commission is requesting modification of the development text to include lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for this Subarea, to restrict the use of the carwash to employees only, to permit internally illuminated campus identification signs, A and B which is what the applicant asked for and have it clarified for administrative approval for sign faces for the brand and campus identification signs only and eliminate language allowing landscaping to be deferred. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there is anywhere else on the property the carwash can be placed. She asked if there is an opportunity to include it in the BMW construction. Mr. Oney said the carwash will have to go in with this phase and not the next. He said in the conceptual plan and when BMW is brought on they are planning to have the Perimeter Loop entrance, as it loops around. He said the carwash could move 20 feet closer. He said the area being proposed for the carwash is more of a service entrance; traffic is trying to be downplayed in this area. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked where the loading and unloading would occur. She said the current carwash location is where semis unload cars. Mr. Walter asked if the Land Rover building is going to be maintained. Mr. Oney said yes. Mr. Walter asked what if the Land Rover brand goes away. Mr. Hale said the Land Rover building stays, if the brand does go away the building would be altered to become more compliant with what is there. Mr. Walter said that would give time to alter the parking, if Land Rover left. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there were any comments. Motion #1 and Vote Mr. Taylor made a motion to recommend approval to City Council of this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because it allows the orderly development and continued a high- quality design of an existing business, meets the development pattern within the area and all applicable review criteria, with eight conditions: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 7 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership; 5) That the development text be modified to include regarding lighting from the existing Perimeter Center text for Subarea J; 6) That the development text be modified to restrict the use of the car wash to employees only; 7) That the development text be modified to permit internally illuminated campus identification signs (A & B) and clarified regarding administrative approval for sign faces for the brand and campus identification signs only; and 8) That the development text be modified to eliminate language allowing landscape screening to be deferred. Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Walter seconded the vote. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. Walter; yes; Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) Motion #2 and Vote Mr. Taylor made a motion to approve this Final Development Plan application because it complies with the development text, preliminary development plan, the applicable review criteria and existing development standards within the area with six conditions: 1) The plans be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement; 2) Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161/US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text; 3) The directional Sign S be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs: 4) The Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a brand ground sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to coordinate with the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 5) That the plan be modified to require that the landscape screening along the eastern property line be installed with the building construction; and 6) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Walter seconded the vote. The vote was as follows: Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. Walter; yes; Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) CASE INFORMATION 6. Perimeter Center PCD, Subareas D, J and J -1 —MAG Volvo Expansion 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP 6325 Perimeter Loop Road Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group dealership campus for a building addition and associated site improvements. This site is located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with a preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us UPDATE This case was postponed from the January 7, 2010 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, due to inclement weather. The content of this report has not changed. Case Summary This is a request for review and approval of a rezoning /preliminary development plan to rezone 15.69 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group Campus) for the purpose of expanding the site to accommodate a building addition and associated site improvements, and to ensure the continued consolidated and orderly funcfion of this auto dealership campus.. This is also a request for review and approval of all final site, architectural and landscaping details as the final development plan for the approximately 46,834- square -foot building PLANNING REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF DUBLIN. mnd U. and JANUARY 21, 2010 unv �nv..bnxnv $B OK l 101 OobOn.OM1io 03J16i2t6 Ph.-11 =6 ] Pox: d W' h- MwctluWlnnM1.as CASE INFORMATION 6. Perimeter Center PCD, Subareas D, J and J -1 —MAG Volvo Expansion 09- 108Z /PDP /FDP 6325 Perimeter Loop Road Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: Creation of a new Planned Unit Development District (MAG PUD) for an expansion of the Midwestern Auto Group dealership campus for a building addition and associated site improvements. This site is located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with a preliminary development plan and review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Car MAG LLC & Car MAG Park LLC; represented by Aaron Underhill, Smith & Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us UPDATE This case was postponed from the January 7, 2010 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, due to inclement weather. The content of this report has not changed. Case Summary This is a request for review and approval of a rezoning /preliminary development plan to rezone 15.69 acres from PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subareas J and D) and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1) to PUD (Midwestern Auto Group Campus) for the purpose of expanding the site to accommodate a building addition and associated site improvements, and to ensure the continued consolidated and orderly funcfion of this auto dealership campus.. This is also a request for review and approval of all final site, architectural and landscaping details as the final development plan for the approximately 46,834- square -foot building Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 2 of 15 expansion for the Volvo brand, a 2,164- square -foot car wash facility, and associated improvements. Site History The Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District was originally approved in 1988, encompassing land between Avery - Muirfield Drive and Emerald Parkway, divided into subareas A through M. Permitted uses include commercial, industrial, residential, and office. A 14 -acre Subarea J of the Perimeter Center plan was created in 1998 specifically for auto dealerships and other uses, with several automotive franchises as a part of the Midwest Auto Group (MAG) campus. In 1998, a separate Land Rover building was added to the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission has approved several amended plans for the site, including building expansions and a skywalk to connect the existing buildings and an expansion for the Jaguar automotive brand. None of these modifications have been built and will be void with approval of this rezoning/preliminary and final development plan. Subarea J -1 was established in 2008 to accommodate the temporary relocation of parking for construction of an anticipated building expansion for the MAG campus. The applicant has since decided to significantly alter the plans for an expansion requiring not only the rezoning of the site, but incorporating additional land for portions of Subarea J -1 and Subarea D. Future Campus Expansion The applicant is proposing in the relatively near future a relocated BMW facility from Post Road to the parcel located to the east of the existing MAG campus. A conceptual development scheme has been provided for reference and indicates the general building architecture and site layout, but is not part of this application. Site Description Location The 15.69 -acre site is located on the north side of US 33 /SR 161 and has approximately 1,000 feet of frontage along Perimeter Loop Road, 700 feet along Perimeter Drive, and 700 feet on Venture Drive. Site Character The rectangular parcel includes two buildings with several automotive franchises including, such brands as Land Rover, Saab, Aston Martin, Bentley, Audi, Porsche, and Volkswagen. The Land Rover franchise, housed in a 7,335- square -foot building to the north, faces Perimeter Drive. A second, 68,585 square foot building, oriented to Perimeter Loop Road and US 33/SR161, has all other vehicle sales, service and administrative office functions. Parking for 677 customer and display spaces is provided along all sides of the building. Vehicle display areas are designed as a unique finger -like arrangement along the western and southern portions of the site. A retention pond is on the north side of the main building at the Perimeter Loop Road entrance. Mature landscaping and significant mounding are located along the site perimeter and provide screening for the loading and vehicular use areas. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 3 of 15 Surrounding Zoning and Uses All surrounding properties to the north and west are zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, as part of the Perimeter Center plan. To the north, across Perimeter Drive, is the WD Partners complex, subject of a recent rezoning application. US 33 /State Route 161 borders the site to the south, and west is the Crown auto campus (Subarea 1) and several office buildings within Subarea F3. To the east are additional office buildings located within Subarea D and the future BMW site. Community Plan Future Land Use This site is designated as General Commercial on Future Land Use Map and the density with the proposed expansion is approximately 8,000 square feet per acre, which is within the range of 6,500 - 8,700 recommended in the Plan. The development text permits uses consistent with the Future Land Use designation. It is Planning's opinion the proposed fit within the definition of General Commercial as stated in the Community Plan as land use comprising a majority of existing retail and commercial development within the city. The Plan describes this type of development as automobile dependent and classifies the uses as auto - oriented, which is consistent with the existing and proposed development. The proposed uses are appropriate for this site and the building has been uniquely designed to accommodate the proposed uses. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Description Overview Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation for the development requirements noted; the Zoning Code covers all other requirements. The development text typically addresses permitted and conditional uses, setbacks, parking, landscaping, signs and architecture, among other subjects. When Subarea J was originally established for MAG, many of the deviations from the Zoning Code were approved as part of the development plan (see attached), which accommodated the rezoning at that time. Planning has advised the applicant in the new PUD process, the preliminary development plan is required to meet either the development text or the Code and the final development requires all final details to be included. The applicant has made significant changes to the previously approved development text to reflect the unique requirements of this user and the site, and to incorporate the previously granted development details. This development text establishes a new Planned Unit Development District with development regulations that are applicable only to these 15.69 acres. Development Text The main change from the previously approved development text for MAG is the establishment of a new Planned District, rather than a new subarea. This allows for more detailed and clear development regulations. Use. The applicant has narrowed the list of uses from the existing Perimeter Center Subarea J text to permit the sales and services of new and used automobiles; medical, business and administrative offices; and research and development laboratories. The Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 04- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 4 of 15 proposed text continues to permit a number of ancillary uses within the primary structure, which includes automobile service, sales of automobile parts and accessories, non - retail coffee shop, and automobile rental services. The proposed rezoning will permit one executive residential suite and a detached, non - retail car wash, both which will be approved with the final development plan application. • Density /Lot Coverage. The proposed development teat does not specify density so the maximum building site will be determined by parking, setbacks and lot coverage. Code permits up to 70 percent lot coverage. • Setbacks. The pavement and building setbacks text are clarified from the original text. Architecture. The proposed development text requires "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture." The proposed building addition is intended to create a visual focal point and will be complementary to the existing building massing and high - quality architectural design. Permitted building materials include glass, metal, EIFS and stone /stone veneer. The design and height of the building addition will offer a dramatic view in the area and create a signature element for the area • Parking. The proposed text requires parking at one space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, three spaces for each service bay, and one space for the executive suite. The previously approved development text defaulted to Code for parking requirements. The Code requires one space for every 100 square feet or three spaces per service bay whichever is greater, which results in a drastically different number of spaces required. The proposed text permits the lesser of the two requirements, which is appropriate for the user's needs. The text also permits automobile display along a maximum of 40% of its property's lineal street frontage. • Landscaping. Site landscaping is required to meet Code. The text provides an exemption for property perimeter screening along SR161 /US33, and defers compliance with screening along the eastern boundary to account for the future expansion of the BMW site to the east. • Signs. The text permits five different types of signs for the MAG campus; campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs, all of which are existing. Road /Boundary Setbacks (ft.) Pavement Buildin Venture Drive 25 75 Perim eter Drive 25 65 Perimeter Loop Road 25 75 SR1611US33 60 60 Eastern Bounda 25 25 • Two ground campus identification signs are permitted at the site entrances. • Two dealership identification signs, one wall sign and one ground sign facing US 33 are permitted. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 5 of 15 • Directional signs are permitted throughout the site, and provide wayfinding to the various sales and services areas. The text permits directional ground signs at each of the brand sales and service entrances. • A wall sign for the existing Land Rover building located at the northern end of the site is permitted, as well as a new proposed wall sign for the Volvo addition. Planning recommends the Volvo wall sign identified within the text be removed and a brand ground sign be utilized adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus. Lighting. The proposed text requires that all lighting across the site is the same and limits the height of poles to 28 feet and requires similar types of fixtures throughout the site, which must be dark in color. The poles are taller than Code permits to match the existing poles. Lighting levels are less than what Code requires. Traffic Study The applicant has provided a traffic analysis study to account for the proposed site modifications, which accounted for a total of 121,245 square feet of building space (based on the Architectural Site Plan sheet 1.01 dated 11/20/09) and has met with the satisfaction of Engineering. However, any additional building square footage proposed will require a traffic impact study as directed by the City Engineer. Final Development Plan Description Overview The Final Development Plan is the last step in the development of a Planned District and requires that all site development details be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The final development plan indicates adherence to all requirements of the proposed development text. In the case of a combined rezoning/preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning/preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Proposal Overview The final development plan indicates the existing two -story sales, service and office building with a proposed four - story, building expansion located at the eastern end of the building. The proposed addition will include the Volvo sales and service functions on the first and second floor, new administrative offices on the third floor and a single executive residential suite located on the top floor. A new landscape and formal entrance area is located at the southeast corner of the proposed addition. A proposed car wash facility is located behind the existing building and proposed addition. Building Addition The proposed 45,834 - square -foot building expansion is located at the southeastern end of the existing building and will continue the design of the existing building by accommodating "pods" in front of the building for each vehicle brand, including driveways to a lower level for the service areas. The proposed eastern elevation includes additional service doors and the entrance to the executive suite. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 6 of 15 Car Wash The proposed 2,164- square -foot car wash is located behind the proposed addition adjacent to the Venture Drive access point. The 18 -foot tall facility provides a single car wash bay for use in association with the dealership sales and service, and will not be open to the public. The proposed car wash is located in an existing service area at the rear of the building, between two areas of parking stalls. Development Requirements The proposed uses comply with the permitted uses of the development text. The lot coverage of 62 percent is under the 70 percent permitted. All pavement and building setbacks are met, including those along the additional right -of -way required along Perimeter Drive. Parking The proposed text requires parking at one space per 300 square feet of building area for sales and office, one per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, three spaces for each service bay, and one space for the Use Area (Requirements) Parking Spaces Business (Sales and Office) 55,743 sq. ft. (1/300) 186 Outdoor Display 85,701 sq. ft (1 /1,000) 86 Service Bays 57 bays (3 per bay) 171 Executive Suite 1 unit (1 per unit) 1 Total 444 677 provided executive suite. The proposed site plan meets required parking. Architecture The existing main building is unique and curved with showrooms on the elevation facing southwest. The building has two levels: the service level partially below grade and the showroom and sales level that is elevated slightly above grade. The main service areas of the building are located along the north and east elevations. The northern portion of the building does not have a showroom element and is currently an office sales area. The proposed building addition is intended to create a visual focal point and finish the end of building utilizing the same architectural design employed on the existing building. The proposed building materials include glass windows, metal framing details, EIFS panels and CMUs, which match the existing building and meet the development text. Landscaping The text requires compliance with the Code's landscaping requirements which are met, with the exception of interior landscaping and property perimeter buffering requirements. The plans will need to be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of interior landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscaping requirement. Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161 /US 33 frontage to meet the perimeter buffering requirements specified in the development text. The plans indicate deferred compliance with screening required along the eastern boundary to account for the future expansion of the BMW site to the east. The plans and the text note that if the BMW site is not complete within three years the appropriate screening must be installed. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 7 of 15 Signs The five types of signs for the MAG campus (campus identification, dealership identification, directional, brand and wall signs) described in the development text are existing, with the exception of the proposed Volvo wall sign, and the applicant is proposing no changes. • Campus and Dealership Identification Signs. The two ground campus identification signs at the site entrances (Signs A &B) and two dealership identification signs, which includes one wall sign (Sign Q) and one ground sign (Sign C) facing US 33, which meet the text. • Directional Signs. Directional signs are shown throughout the site to provide wayfinding to the various sales and services areas (Signs D -J and R -T). These signs meet the text with exception of Sign S, which Planning recommends be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs. • Brand Signs. The text permits ground signs at each of the brand sales and service entrances (Signs K -O). Two types of brand signs are identified in the text; single brand identification signs and multi -brand identification signs. The proposed development text modifies area, color and secondary image requirements in order to restrict the design and size of future brand sign. In doing this, a number of the existing signs will no longer be in compliance but are allowed to remain until the signs are modified, at which time the requirements of the development text must be met. • Wall Signs. The text accounts for the existing wall sign for the Land Rover building (Sign P) at the north end of the site, and a new wall sign for the Volvo addition. Planning recommends the Volvo wall sign be removed and a ground brand sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs. Lighting The proposed plan meets lighting requirements but provides 28 -foot tall poles and fixtures to match existing lighting. Stormwater Management Stormwater is accommodated from the increase in impervious surface on this site with a vegetated swale on adjacent land. The swale is temporary until the adjacent property develops at which time both sites must comply with the City's stormwater code. This is a viable method of controlling the stormwater in order to meet the City's desire to find greener methodologies of complying with the City's code. The swale will allow water to filter through the ground prior to reaching the public storm sewer. An access easement for the swale will be needed. Utilities and Right -of -Way Existing water and sanitary sewer services are used for the expansion. The Community Plan requires an additional 10 feet of dedicated right -of -way for Perimeter Drive. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 8 of 15 PLANNING ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning/preliminary development plan. The following is an evaluation by Planning based on those criteria. The criteria are arranged in the following categories and are in a different order than listed in the Code: Adopted Policies and Plans (Criteria 1, 2, 3, and 4) The proposed development is consistent with the Dublin Zoning Code; is in conformity with the Community Plan; advances the general welfare of the City; and the proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value ofproperty within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded. Criteria met. The Future Land Use Plan of the 2007 Community Plan identifies the land use for this site as General Commercial. In Planning's opinion, this proposal only expands upon uses already permitted for this site, which are consistent with the FLU designation. Parks and Open Space (Criteria 5 and 6) The proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; and the proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site. Criteria met. Not applicable to commercial development. Traffic, Utilities and Stormwater Management (Criteria 7, 8, and 11) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; and adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; and adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas. Criteria met with conditions. The site will have access to adequate utilities and access to this site is available from several points along three public roads. An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City (Condition 1). The applicant provided traffic analysis, which accounts for the square footage of existing buildings and proposed addition; however, any additional building square footage proposed beyond this size will require a traffic impact study as directed by the City Engineer (Condition 2). Development Standards (Criteria 9, and 10) The relationship of buildings and structures provides for the coordination and integration of this development to the community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; and the development standards, and the design and layout of the open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements contribute to the orderly development of land within the City. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP— Page 9 of 15 Criteria may be met with condition. The proposal maintains the existing development requirements of the original Perimeter Center text. The proposed uses have adequate parking and accessibility. In order to provide a consistent sign package, Planning recommends the development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a ground brand sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus (Condition 3). Planning also recommends the existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership (Condition 4). Design Standards (12, and 13) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Code or the Subdivision Regulations; are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; and the proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City. Criteria met. The development text outlines all applicable development standards for this site and is consistent to the existing site and design standards. Infrastructure (Criteria 14, 15 and 16) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; the proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements; and the applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. Criteria met. There are adequate services in place. Final Development Plan Section 153.055(B) of the Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a final development plan. Following is an evaluation by Planning based on those criteria. The criteria are arranged in the following categories and may be in a different order than listed in the Code: Adopted Policies and Plans (Criteria 1, 3, 9, & 10). The proposed modifications conform to the approved preliminary development plan, have adequate public facilities and open spaces, are carried out in progressive stages, and conform to all other applicable zoning text and Code requirements. Criteria met. The proposal conforms to the preliminary development plan in terms of permitted use, lot coverage, and setbacks. Site Safety and Circulation (Criteria 2 & 5). The proposed modifications provide for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation and provide adequate lighting for such uses. Criteria met. The site provides adequate lighting, and vehicular circulation for the proposed uses. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 10 of 15 Development Details (Criteria 4, 6, 7, & 8). The details of the development are sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site, include appropriate landscaping and signs, and provide adequate storm drainage. Criteria met with conditions. The proposed plans meet the preliminary plan with regard to landscaping with the following exceptions. The plans will need to be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement (Condition 1). Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161 /US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text (Condition 2). The proposed directional signs meet the text with exception of Sign S, which Planning recommends be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs (Condition 3). Planning also recommends the Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a ground brand sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus (Condition 4). Adequate stormwater provisions have been made for the site; however, a stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering (Condition 5). Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan In Planning's opinion, this proposal complies with the rezoning/preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area Approval with conditions is recommended: Conditions 1) An additional 10 feet of right -of -way along Perimeter Drive is required to be dedicated to the City; 2) If additional building square footage is constructed that is not accounted for in the traffic analysis a traffic impact study must be provided, as directed by the City Engineer; 3) The development text be modified to eliminate the option of a wall sign for the Volvo brand and permit a brand ground sign adjacent to the Volvo entrance to match the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; and 4) The existing Perimeter Center development text be updated to remove references and requirements for the MAG dealership. Final Development Plan In Planning's opinion, this proposal complies with the preliminary development plan, the final development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval is recommended with conditions. Conditions 1) The plans be revised to account for an additional 337 square feet of landscape area and three trees to meet the interior landscape requirement; Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 11 of 15 2) Four additional trees will need to be planted along the SR161 /US33 frontage to meet the planting requirements specified within the development text; 3) The directional Sign S be removed from the pole and ground- mounted to be consistent with the existing directional signs; 4) The Volvo wall sign indicated on the final development plans be removed and a brand ground sign be permitted adjacent to the Volvo entrance to coordinate with the existing brand signs on the MAG campus; 5) A stormwater easement will need to be provided, subject to approval by Engineering. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 12 of 15 REZONING /PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading/introduction and a second reading/public hearing for a final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. In the case of a combined rezoning/preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning/preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 13 of 15 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area, and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 14 of 15 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Final Development Plan The purpose of the Planned Unit Development process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process consists of up to three stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The intent of the final development plan is to show conformance with and provide a detailed refinement of the total aspects of the approved preliminary development plan (rezoning). The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The Commission may approve as submitted, approve with modifications agreed to by the applicant, or disapprove and terminate the process. If the application is disapproved, the applicant may respond to Planning and Zoning Commission's concerns and resubmit the plan. This action will be considered a new application for review in all respects, including payment of the application fee. Appeal of any action taken by the Commission shall be to the Court of Common Pleas in the appropriate jurisdiction. Following approval by the Commission, the applicant may proceed with the building permit process. In the event that updated citywide standards are applicable, all subsequently approved final development plans shall comply with the updated standards if the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the updated standards would not cause undue hardship. Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(B) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in §153.053(E)(4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; Planning and Zoning Commission January 21, 2010 — Planning Report Application No. 09- 108Z/PDP/FDP —Page 15 of 15 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10) The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. 1998 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN t r t ! i I _ij rri I� �J R'I r- O O O O o w l �=A m I I Plan I p arMr I f- [? OHM 1 i PROPOSED SITE PLAN �.� FASItr usa t { f aitsnca j k Aim fi No PAPKRa- f.. I ti4 I [1157 • !fern C1 1 1 PARUIG NAAKbo fff ax157 F-L i. , j Do-%M af. 1 OJOTCMR µ f COT \ PA'Ai�T4 .175 � I I PAgCCat7 .�.— -,. —. ' I N - - - - - - - - - - - - 09- 108Z /FDP COW"BJ.S- MdQ�'SYILLE QD - - - Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN lent Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SW Elevation SE Elevation 09- 1087✓FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED ELEVATIONS East Elevation North Elevation 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED CARWASH ELEVATIONS South Elevation North Elevation U -._ �© 1 - 1 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED CARWASH ELEVATIONS East Elevation F E-- West Elevation 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT 1 PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO As Passed by Couficil September 6, 1988 Revised December 21, 1989 Revised February 5, 1990 Revised November 19, 1990 Revised January 3, 1994 Revised November 7, 1994 Revised February 6, 1995 Revised January 15, 1997 Revised September 5, 2000 Revised December 11, 2000 Revised June 21, 2001 Revised January 29, 2002 09- 1082 /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER TEXT INDEX PAGE SUBAREA ........................................................................................................ .............................ii PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA STANDARDS ............................................... ............................... I SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ......................................................... ..............................4 SUBAREA A INTERCHANGE RELATED ............................................ ..............................9 SUBAREA B POST ROAD RELATED ................................................ ............................... i 1 SUBAREA B -1 REVISED POST ROAD RELATED ............................................. .............................14 SUBAREA -2, B -3 HOMESTEAD ................................................................. .............................17 SUBAREA C INTERNAL ORIENTATION ........................................... .............................25 SUBAREA D STATE ROUTE 161 RELATED USES ........................... .............................28 SUBAREAE SERVICES ZONE ........................................................... .............................30 SUBAREAF RETAIL CENTER ............................................................ .............................38 SUBAREAS F -1, F -2, AND F -3 RETAIL CENTER RELATED (RESTAURANT/FLEX OFFICE) ................................... .............................43 SUBAREAG MULTI- FAMILY ............................................................. .............................46 SUBAREA G -1 MULTI - FAMILY ( REVISED) ........................................ .............................48 SUBAREA H CONDOMINIUM (REVISED) ........................................ .............................50 SUBAREA I TRANSITIONAL AREA .................................................. .............................52 SUBAREA J MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP (MAG) ............. .............................56 SUBAREA K GORDON FLESCH CO., INC .......................... .............................63 SUBAREA L SERVICES ZONE ....................................... .............................66 SUBAREA M CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL .............................. .............................74 APPENDIX A SUBAREA F ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................ ............................A -1 APPENDIX B SUBAREA G -1 ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................ ............................B -1 APPENDIX C SUBAREA J ILLUSTRATI0�4S . .............................................. ............................0 -1 APPENDIX D SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS .. ............................... D -1 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER SUBAREA STANDARDS (Revised 113/94,11/7/94,01/29102) The following Subarea Descriptions and Development Standards by subarea shall be made part of the Concept Plan and are further discussed and illustrated in the Subarea Plan. SUBAREA DESCRIPTIONS Subarea A Interchange Related (25.4 acres) Because of its location adjacent to a major freeway interchange, Subarea A may contain freeway oriented uses similar to the other two quadrants on the east side of the Route 161 at 1 -270 interchange and include hotels /motels, general office uses, corporate headquarters office or major institutional uses. Subarea B Post Road Related (42.0 acres) This area is characterized by its relationship with residential uses on the north side of Post Road and the need for a reasonable landscaped setback buffer between the residential uses and the proposed development. Subarea B -1 Revised Post Road Related area (7.4 acres) This area is also characterized by its relationship with residential uses on the north side of Post Road. The permissible uses will include compact disc manufacture in addition to office -type uses. All development standards and buffers from Subarea B will continue to be applicable. Subareas B -2B -3 Homestead The development being proposed for this area is a mixed -use community. Homestead at Perimeter Center will be a condominium development with a small amount of commercial space integrated into a residential community. Within a condominium form of ownership all streets are private, and services such as trash pick -up, snow removal, exterior building maintenance, an lawn care are provided by the condominium association. This translates into less demand on public services. Within a condominium development the buyers will be purchasing individual dwelling and/or working units. Individual lots, as in a traditional single - family subdivision, do not exist. After a unit has been purchased, the condominir•n resident's association must approve any changes to the exterior of that unit, including additions or alterations to any buildings and any significant changes to the common areas. Subarea C Internal Orientation (91.6 acres) Uses within this subarea shall include a mix of commercial, office research and light industrial uses or uses that exhibit a degree of clean, quiet unobjectionable processing activities within an enclosed structure. These uses are more appropriate to Subarea C because of its internal 09- 1082 /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT relationship within the site. Subarea D State Route 161 Related Uses Because of extensive State Route 161 frontage, uses within Subarea D are primarily freeway oriented, general office, corporate headquarters office and institutional uses, hotels and motels. Subarea E Services Zone (14.2 acres) Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planing/traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subareas F, F -1, F -2, and F-3 Retail Center (33.0 acres) This area contains a mix of retail/commercial uses in an integrated shopping environment typical in size to a community center. This self - contained area also has access on all sides creating an even distribution of traffic. (Revised 2/6/95) Subarea G Multi - Family (16.2 acres) As a buffer or a transition zone to the single - family area to the north (Post Road frontage), the multi - family area will have a unified, residential scale appearance with a limited density. Subarea G -1 Multi - Family (13.1 acres) This area contains high density multi- family development which serves as a transition zone between a retail/commercial community center to the west and lower density multi - family development to the north and east. Architecture of the buildings is to be consistent with the Perimeter Shopping Center (Subarea F) in its design, materials, architecture, detailing and overall quality. Subarea H Condominium (8.0 acres) This subarea may be used for multifamily condominium housing at a density of less than 7 units per acre. (Revised 11/7/94) Subarea I Transitional Area This zone will function as a transition zone between the retail uses of Subarea E (the service zone along Avery Road), and F, F -1, F -2, and F -3 (the retail mall) and the freeway oriented office area Subarea D to the east. Subarea J Midwestern Auto Group (14.787 acres) 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT This is a visible area that has been rezoned to allow Midwestern Auto Group to develop it as a high quality automobile retail and service operation. For uses other than automobile dealerships the development standards shall be those contained in Subarea D, Perimeter Center. Subarea K Gordon Flesch Co.. Inc. (4.37 acres) Due to Subarea K's high visibility from state Route 161 /US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea K, but the use definition shall be expanded so that Gordon Flesch may operate within the new subarea. Subarea L Services Zone: (1.959 acres) Typically found between a major interchange and the first arterial intersections, this subarea contains freestanding uses on individual lots that require a highly visible orientation and immediate access. Architecture, signage and site planning /traffic elements are coordinated through various controls to assure a unified development appearance. Subarea M Children's Hospital: Due to Subarea M's high visibility from State Route 161/US 33, it is essential to maintain a high level of quality development. All the qualitative aspects of "Subarea D" as originally established shall be incorporated in this Subarea M, except for the parking requirements'Which shall be modified due to the unique nature of Children's Close to Home Facility. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS General: If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the Planned Commerce District shall prevail. Standards in the Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply to each of the subareas in the Planned Commerce District. 2. The standards included herein shall not require modification of any structures, landscaping, or other improvements actually in place as a result of development occurring prior to this rezoning. Such structures, landscaping and improvements shall be considered permitted and legal and conforming uses at the location and to the size and degree they exist at the time of said rezoning. Perimeter Drive will be constructed through to Wilcox Road as a part of the initial development phase of Subarea F, F -1, F -2, and F -3. The loop road through Area E, F, D shall also be constructed as part of the initial phase. At such time as the part of said Perimeter Drive is constructed through the Thomas property, the remainder of said Perimeter Drive from the east line of the McKitrick property to the west line of the Thomas property shall forthwith start and be completed within a reasonable time. The entire length of Perimeter Drive shall have a sidewalk along the southern right -of -way from Avery Road to Coffman toad. Nothing herein shall prohibit owner(s) from completing Perimeter Drive prior to the required completion period. If additional right -of -way is required for ramp widening, it shall be provided. The landscape buffer along the south side of Post Road shall be installed in its entirety from Avery Road to Wilcox Road with the beginning of construction on Subarea G, H, F or the construction of Perimeter Drive from Avery to Wilcox. With regard to the mound and landscaping required on the property along Post Road and owned by applicant Olde Poste Properties, the following schedule should apply: a. At such time as any parcel of said property along Post Road is developed, applicant shall complete the mounding and landscaping along the Post Road frontage of said parcel as a part of the initial phase of construction and maintain the same thereafter. b. In addition, if said applicant, prior to the completion of the mound and landscaping as required under a) hereof should develop lands lying north of Perimeter Drive (not at the date of this rezoning developed) with construction amounting to 100,000 square feet of building area or more, applicant will complete the entire mound and the landscaping between the mound and the Post Road right -of -way from Discovery Boulevard to the 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT east if the City of Dublin undertakes to water the landscaping elements until any or all parts of the Post Road frontage mound and landscaping are constructed in accordance with a) hereof. For these purposes, neither the planned day care center which is a permitted use at the northeast comer of Discovery Boulevard and the proposed loop street nor construction on the 15 -acre parcel owned by White Consolidated Industries shall be included within the said 100,000 square feet. The applicant shall be obligated to pay one -third of the cost of the improvement of Avery Road from the south right -of -way line of Post Road to the north right -of -way line of S.R. 161 according to plans approved by the City of Dublin if, and only if, the City of Dublin agrees to pay one -thud of said cost, and one -third of said cost is assumed by those owning property on the west side of Avery Road, between Post Road and S.R. 161. Said improvement shall be undertaken and performed by applicant prior to the opening of any commercial use on applicant's property the subject of this rezoning if, and only if, the City of Dublin furnishes the applicant in money or required materials with its share of said costs at a time which reasonably meets applicant`s construction and opening schedules. In addition, applicant agrees to include within the improvement project that part of Avery Road ( Muirfield Boulevard) from the south right -of -way line of Post Road to the present southerly terminus of the four land section of Muirfield Drive north of Indian Run if, and only if, the City of Dublin furnishes the applicant in money or required materials with the cost of said additional construction. Both applicant and the City of Dublin understand that appropriate contracts will be executed covering the construction contemplated herein. 4. The street plan shown on the plan is the general plan which will be platted and constructed. It is not, however, intended to be precise, and while the functional system will be produced, its precise location may vary from that shown so long as the functional objectives continue to be attained. A safe bike connection from Post Road to Perimeter Mall through areas G & H will be provided if the bikeway connection over S.R. 161 is made, a bike tidlink will be completed to Post Road from the proposed bike path in Area Q H to State Route 161 connection. Signage and Graphics: DESIGN CRITERIA a. These criteria are written in conjunction with the Dublin Sign Code Chapter 1189. In areas of conflict, these criteria shall supersede the Dublin Sign Code. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT b. Materials and Landscaping: (1) All signs with a base shall have the base constructed of the predominant material of the user building. (2) All signs mounted on pylons shall have landscaping around the base of the sign and around the pylons such that the pylons are not visible. All plantings shall be of an evergreen material (see Example E attached). The length of the pylons shall be limited to two (2) feet between the grade elevation and the bottom of the sign face. C. Dimensions of Sign: (1) Maximum area of sign face: 50 square feet per face, with a limit of no more than two faces per sign. (2) Area of sign base (if any) shall not exceed area of sign face. The base shall not be included in the overall area permitted for the sign face. (3) Maximum overall height: 8' -0" above top of adjacent stred curb. Signs located on earthen mounds shall maintain conformance to 8' -0" maximum height above top of adjacent curb. (4) It is intended that the signs shall be generally rectangular in design with an approximately 3' to 5' height to length ratio. Specific designs for each user may be considered on their own merit as long as they follow these general guidelines. (See Exhibit A through E attached). d. Sign Graphics: (1) Graphic identification shall be limited to the site users name, logo and street number. (2) The area of graphic images such as logos shall not exceed 20% of the sign face. (3) Street numbers shall be located in the lower corner of the sign face or base nearest the right -of -way. (4) The maximum height of any letter or number shall be 16 ". 6 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT e. Quantity: No more than one ground sign shall be permitted on any one lot or multiple lots if devoted to one specific use or user, except that, for buildings or uses having fr6ntage on each of two public rights -of -way, two ground signs are permitted. Neither ground sign shall, by itself, exceed the maximum allowable area of 50 square feet for each face. f. Signs may: (a) be non - illuminated, (b) feature internally illuminated graphics or incorporate back -lit graphics. Only the sign graphics shall be illuminated. g. Signage setbacks from the right -of -way are as follows: (1) 10' -0" along Avery Road (2) 12' -0" along the south side of Perimeter Drive (3) 8' -0" in all other areas. h. Traffic and directional signs. shall be in conformance with Dublin Sign Code 1189.03. i. Within Subarea B, all signage shall be limited to the south side-of all structures along Post Road. j. No sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building, wall or fence. No wall murals shall be allowed. k. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 1. No roof signs shall be permitted, nor should a sign extend higher than the building. m. No flashing, traveling, animated or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. n. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site or "for sale" or "for lease" signs in accordance with Dublin Code 1189.03(g). 6. Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated: 09- 108Z /FDP 7 Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT a. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut off type fixtures. b. All types of parking, pedestrian and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall - mounted cutoff fixture and shall be from the same type and style. C. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be constructed of dark wood, dark brown, black or bronze metal. d. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28'. e. Cutoff type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. f All lights shall be arranged to ,reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. g. Direct or indirect glare into the eyes of motorists or pedestrians shall be avoided. h. All building illuminations shalrbe from concealed sources. I. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. j. Landscape lighting along Avery Road shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. g 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea D - State Route 161 Related Uses Permitted Uses: The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea D: a) Those uses listed in Section 1159.01 and 1 175.01 of the Zoning Code. b) Corporate offices. c) Hotel and motel. d) Institutional uses. e) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. f) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. Yard and Setback Requirements: 1. Setback on Perimeter Drive shall be 35' for all pavement areas and 75' for buildings. 2. Setback along State Route 161 shall be 60' for all pavement areas and buildings. 3. Side yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 4. Rear yards shall be 25' for pavement and buildings. 5. All other publicly dedicated local streets shall have a 25' pavement setback and 50' building setback_ 6. Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of the total lot area. However, parking garages and buildings shall cover no more than 75% of the total lot area. Height Requirements: 1. The maximum height for structures in Area D shall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and have a maximum height limitation of 65'. The maximum height may be extended if the structure is setback from both Perimeter Drive and State Route 161 right -of -way an additional 2' feet beyond the required setback for every 1 foot of height above the 65' maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures. Parking and Loading: 28 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT 1. Sizes, ratio, and type of parking and loading and other facilities shall be regulated by Dublin Code Chapter 1193. 2. Bank drive -thru requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. Circulation: 1. Perimeter Drive shall have a 80' right -of -way and a 36 pavement width. All other local public access streets shall have a 60' right -of -way and a 32' pavement width. 2. Ventura Boulevard shall have a 60' right -of -way. 3. _ The Loop Road shall have a 60' right -of -way, and a 36' pavement width. 4. Curb cuts on Perimeter Drive shall be spaced a minimum of 200' (as measured from the driveway's centerline) with opposing cuts offset no less than 100' or directly aligned wherever possible consistent with prudent traffic engineering principles and practice. , Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. Landscaping: I. All landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1 187. 2. In addition and within the required building setback, a 3'- 4' earthen landscaped mound shall be provided along Perimeter Drive with street trees planted 50' on center and located +1' from R.O.W. line with R.O.W. 3. Along S.R. 161, a 6' landscaped mound shall be provided with trees planted a minimum of i tree per 30' O.F.T.O. (trees may be grouped). 29 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Subarea .� Midwestern_Auto Grogp {new subarea from SuUarca D Revised 619197, Ordinance N6.41 -97 Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in Subarea J: a) Those uses listed in Section 153.026 (Suburban office and Institutional District) and 153.034 (Office, Laboratory and Research District) of the Dublin Code, and such other general office uses not specified in those districts, or in other sections of the standard zoning district regulations, but which are of similar intensity and impact. b) Corporate offices c) Hotel and motel. d) Institutional uses. e) Drive -in facilities developed in association with a permitted use. f) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. g) Automobile dealership (new and used cars) as per Section 153.028 (A)(I)(c)(551) -of the Dublin Code. i) automotive service as an ancillary use. Body work shall not be permitted. ii) retail sales of manufacturer branded retail accessories and lifestyle items and automotive related retail items as an ancillary use, provided, the use is internal to the permitted use. iii) coffee shop selling beverages and minor food consumption items, as an ancillary use, provided, the use is internal to the. permitted use. iv) petroleum storage and dispensing as an ancillary use, providing that the use is solely for fueling of vehicles being sold or serviced on site, that there are no retail sales of fuel, that total storage does not exceed 10,000 gallons, that the storage vessel is fully screened from roadways and adjoining property, and that all aspects of location, storage, screening and operation are approved as part of the development plan. v) special events on an occasional basis, utilizing the site for theater, orchestra, gallery, civic meetings or similar entertainment or assembly uses. Provided however, that a use under this category is a not a use of right unless coupled with a development plan presented concurrently with the rezoning, and, a revision of an approved development plan will constitute, and be considered as if, a rezoning were 56 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT being requested. Development Standards for Automotive Dealerships Architecture and Site Design: An automotive dealership to be approved for construction in this subarea must present striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture and site design. A typical automotive dealership with box -like buildings and conventional vehicle display will not be considered a use of right in this category. This design must be harmonious with and not negatively influence adjoining Subarea D uses. Quality of construction and materials must be equal or superior to adjoining retail and office uses to the west and to that of anticipated Subarea D uses to the east and north. Specific Development Issues: a) No balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes or similar visual attraction on site are permitted for any purpose. Other attention getting ploys, such as turning on displayed vehicles headlights or emergency flashers, is also prohibited. This prohibition does not preclude use of auto emergency flashers or other lighting for safety purposes during working hours. b) No painting or other surface graphics of prices, slogans or other advertising on displayed vehicles is permitted. c) Display information on vehicle not a part of the vehicle itself is limited to normal manufacturer s or dealer s forms located on the inside of displayed autos windows for reading from the outside. Such forms are permissible provided that the forms are designed for reading at close range and do not constitute advertising designed to attract a buyer to the vehicle. Required federal or state forms are permissible regardless of form. Used cars may have in addition one two digit graphic on a window indicating the year of the auto providing the size of the graphic does not exceed 5 X6 . d) Bodywork is not permitted on site. If damaged vehicles are delivered to the site for repair they will be stored out of sight of any public roadway and will be moved as soon as possible. e) No,outside loudspeakers for the purpose of broadcasting messages or sales information are permitted. A ground level musical background system is permitted provided that it is inaudible at the property line. Staff review and approval of a proposed ground level musical system is required prior to installation. f) Corporate identity special event flags are permitted on occasional basis provided appropriate municipal approval is obtained, if required: g) Loading docks must be fully screened and integrated into the architecture of the 57 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT buildings. Each primary structure is limited to two loading docks. Loading docks must be fully screened from roadways and adjoining properties. h) Parking and access areas are divided into four categories: i) Vehicle display. This category covers parking of autos that are intended for display to customers, who may be either already on the site, or near enough to view vehicles from the street. The development plan will designate such vehicle display areas and the maximum number of vehicles that may be located in any such area at one time. The display area need not be lined and there is no limitation on vehicle arrangement, but, no more than this maximum number of vehicles may be located in each area at one time without constituting a zoning code violation. ii) Customer and employee parking. This category is for parking of customers vehicles while at the dealership; for parking of vehicles being dropped off' or picked up for service; and for employee parking. All spaces in this category will be so designated on the development plan and will be lined. iii) Vehicle storage areas. Vehicles in these areas are not intended for display and are awaiting preparation for display, are awaiting service, or are awaiting removal to another location. Vehicle storage areas are to be so indicated on the development plan. No limitations on numbers or arrangement of vehicles are made, and the space does not need to be lined with parking spaces. However, vehicles in this area will generally be screened from public roadways, and this screening arrangement must be approved as part of the development plan. iv) Vehicle access lanes. These areas are intended for access to sales and display areas, service areas, storage areas, employee parking areas and loading or delivery areas. These vehicle access lanes will be so indicated on the development plan and may not be used for any use other than vehicle access. Parking in vehicle access lanes is prohibited. Parking of vehicles for display in vehicle access lanes constitutes a zoning code violation. v) Sizes of parking spaces and access lanes and ratio (to determine number of required spaces) shall be regulated by provisions o e ublin Co e. vi) Bank drive -thru requirements as per the Columbus Zoning Code. vii), The graphic parking plan attached to this application shows the arrangement of the above vehicular use areas and the total spaces associated with each category. (See Appendix C) j) Treatment of petroleum products on site i) Waste oil and waste anti - freeze must be stored above ground within a primary structure, which may be a loading dock. 58 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT ii) All other petroleum products used on site (such as in hydraulic lifts) must be EPA approved materials handled in accordance with federal and state regulations. iii) New (as yet unused) petroleum products will be stored above ground indoors within a primary structure. iv) Petroleum fuels products (diesel fuel or gasoline) will be stored in above ground containers, fully screened from any public roadway. Access to both dispensing points and the storage containers must be sufficient to allow access by all anticipated emergency vehicles. Plans showing compliance with this section will be submitted to the fire chief for his/her written evaluation prior to zoning staff consideration. k) Mechanicals screening. All building mechanical units must be so located and screened so as not to be visible by automobile from Route 33/161 or from any roadway adjoining the site. 1) Lighting. All lighting shall conform to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines, except where an exception is allowed by Planning and Zoning Commission as part of the Development Plan. Display lighting will have two modes, one for when the dealership is open and one for when the dealership is closed (after hours). After hours lighting may include highlighting of specific cars, but will not permit overall lighting of high intensity. This prohibition includes the interior lighting of the showrooms; ie, the after hours interior lighting of the showrooms shall be subdued and the overall interior shall not appear to be fully illuminated as seen from route 33/161. The lighting plan for the highlighting of cars on the display fingers must be approved as part of the development plan as being not only technically satisfactory, but also aesthetically appropriate. m) signage i) Signage will reflect a quality level equal to that of the buildings on the site as approved as part of the development plan. ii) Interior directional signage will be to a common standard throughout the site. iii) Interior display signage is not regulated provided it is not higher than 3' and is not easily visible from public roads. iv) Logos or signage located inside a structure but visible outside the structure must be reviewed as part of the development plan if lighted by other than normal interior lighting. v) Size and character of proposed signage and graphics are shown on the attached graphics and location plan.(See Appendix C) There are four key signs. Two pylon signs are similar in design. Each is 15 tall. One is located to the left (north)of the 59 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Perimeter Loop entrance and the second to the right (north) of the unnamed street entrance (on the east). Each of these signs is a combination of translucent panels and aluminum panels. The aluminum panels have logos for the marques sold at the dealership and are removable, to allow for changes. The sign area is 25 square feet per side. Applicant may utilize its current pylon sign from the existing dealership for one of these locations as an interim sign. The third major sign is a ground sign facing Route 33/161. The design of this sign is shown on the attached graphic. The sign consists of backlit metallic letters spelling MAG set against a masonry base. The height of the masonry base is 4 and the full height of the sign is 5. The sign has one face of 50 sf oriented toward Route 161/33. The location is 8' from the property line, towards the eastern edge of the site. The fourth major sign is a wall sign to be located on the future building on the north end of the site which may be used as the Land Rover Center. The wall sign shall be architecturally integrated with the design of the elevation on which the sign is placed. The sign shall not exceed 32 square feet, not including the Dublin information blow the logo area of the sign, the letters for which shall not exceed 14" in height. For this initial use, the entire sign will be the oval Land Rover trademark name, and the applicant anticipates that it will be placed upon a vertical design element, which is a feature of Land Rover Center buildings, should such a feature be approved by the Planning Commission in the Final Development Plan. The sign shall be placed sDft it is at least 9" from the edge of the vertical design element. The height of the sign shall not exceed 80% of the vertical design element of the building but in any case shall not exceed 25', and the vertical design element itself shall not exceed 35' in height. Other architectural elements of the Land Rover Center concept will need to be reconciled with the primary structure, surrounding architecture, and expectations of the Planning and Zoning Commission as part of the development plan for this additional structure. An additional sign is located at the second (south) entrance on Wall Street. It is 4' high and is similar in design to the taller main pylon signs. It will function only as a directional sign however and will contain no logos. It is specifically mentioned as an approved sign solely because it is visible from the public right of way. There will also be additional internal signs in front of each of the dealership pods, shown on the site signage graphic as ramp ID `locations. (See Appendix C) There will also be a number of directional signs throughout the site, as shown on this same graphic. Applicant also will reuse its present BMW pylon, located at its current location, in the vicinity of the BMW dealership pod, the easternmost of the three pods. This is intended to be an internal sign. The precise location of this sign is undetermined and applicant anticipates that the details of its use will be subject to staff approval. vi) Changes to the above signage may be necessary in the event of future development on the site or for other reasons. Additional signage, or modifications to the above 60 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT signage, may be used if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or planning staff. vii) The logo area of signs may vary from the code requirements if approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. viii) No wall signs are permitted on any elevation facing SR 161/US Rt. 33. n) Yard and Setback Requirements. i) Setback along Perimeter Drive shall be 35 for all pavement areas and 75 for buildings. I — " d (-p w , PI terns - ii) Setback along State Route 161 shall a 60 for all pavement areas and buildings. iii) Side yards shall be 25 for pavement and buildings. iv) Rear yards shall be 25 for pavement and buildings. v) All other publicly dedicated local streets shall have a 25 pavement setback and 50 building setback. vi) Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of total lot area. However, building and pavement coverage shall not exceed 75% of the total lot area o) Height Requirements. The maximum height for structures in Subarea K hall be measured per the Dublin Zoning Code and may have a maximum height of 65 . The maximum height may be extended if the structure is set back from both Perimeter Drive and State Route 161 right -of -way an additional 2 beyond the required setback for every 1 foot of height above the 65 maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures fronting on State Route 161. p) Waste and Refuse. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. q) Storage and Equipment. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structures. r) Landscaping. i) All landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code unless a deviation is specifically approved as part of the final development plan. s) The access points for the site are shown on the attached site plan. Access to Perimeter Drive is prohibited. 09- 1082 /FDP 61 Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT PERIMETER CENTER DEVELOPMENT TEXT Q This rezoning is specifically linked to the development plan approved under this case number by Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission on May 1, 1997. Should construction on that development plan not commence within two years of enactment of this rezoning, unless further extended by City Council, the zoning for the site shall revert to Subarea D, Perimeter Center. Development Standards for Other Permitted Uses For uses other than automobile dealerships the development standards shall be those contained in Subarea D, Perimeter Center. 62 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENT - TEXT PERIMETER CENTER PUD SUBAREA J -1 June 26, 2008 Summary The subject site consists of 2.21=L acres of real property located south of and adjacent to Venture Drive, north of U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161, and east of Perimeter Loop Road. This proposal seeks to rezone the property to permit the same uses and same development standards as are currently applicable to the property, and also serves to clarify the right to improve the property with a stand -alone parking lot that will accommodate employee parking and vehicle storage for the Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) automobile dealership, which is found adjacent to this site. The stand along parking lot will accommodate the automobile dealership's parking needs following the redesign of that facility as proposed in an amended final development plan that is on file with the city. The intent is to integrate the parking lot into the redesigned site so as to provide a seamless transition across the properties. II. Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. Ill. Permitted Uses A. The following uses shall be permitted in Subarea J -1: 1) Those uses listed in Section 153.026 (Suburban Office and Institutional District) and 153.034 (Office, Laboratory and Research District) of the Dublin City Code, and such other general office uses not specified in those districts or in other sections of the standard zoning district regulations, but which are of similar intensity and impact. 2) Corporate offices 3) Hotel and motel 4) Institutional uses 5) Ancillary commercial uses within a structure primarily devoted to office uses. 09- 1082 /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED *DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6) A stand -alone parking lot for employee parking and/or vehicle storage serving an automobile dealership located in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD or a successor zoning district that is applicable to the same property ( "Stand Alone Parking Lot ") shall be allowed as a conditional use, provided that it is approved in accordance with Section 153.236. IV. Development Standards A. Stand Alone Parking Lot Development Standards. A Stand Alone Parking Lot (as defined above) shall be limited to a maximum of 191 spaces. The Stand Alone Parking Lot shall be used for the purposes of employee parking and/or vehicle storage and shall not be used for the sale of automobiles. B. Yard and Setback Requirements. 1) The minimum setback along Venture Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement and buildings. 2) The minimum setback from the southern boundary of this PUD shall be 30 feet for all pavement areas and buildings. 3) Side yards along the western boundary of this subarea shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings. If this subarea is used solely as a parking lot to serve the automobile dealership found in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD then there shall be no minimum setback for pavement between that subarea and this Subarea J -1. 4) There shall be a minimum side yard of 10 feet along the eastern boundary of this subarea. 5) Total ground covered by all buildings shall not exceed 25% of total lot area. If this subarea is used solely as a parking lot, then there shall be a maximum lot coverage requirement of 65 %. C. Height Requirements. The maximum height for structures in Subarea J -1 shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. The maximum height may be extended if the structure is set back from both the Perimeter Drive and State Route 161 right -of- way an additional 2 feet beyond the required setback for every 1 foot of height above the 65 foot maximum. A minimum height of two stories shall be required for all primary structures fronting on State Route 161. 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. APPROVED DEVELOPMENTTEXT D. Waste and Refuse. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. E. Storage and Equipment. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structures. F. Landscaping 1) All landscaping shall be in accordance with to the Dublin Landscape Code unless a deviation is specifically approved as part of the Final Development Plan. G. Circulation. The vehicular access points for the site shall be approved on the Final Development Plan for this subarea. In the event that this subarea is used solely as a parking lot to serve the automobile dealership in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center PUD, then the parking lot shall be accessed only through Subarea J and shall not be permitted any curbcuts on Venture Drive. The owner of Subarea J -1 shall be required to provide evidence to the City of a cross - access agreement with the owner of Subarea J which reflects this access arrangement prior to the issuance of the necessary permits for operation and use of the parking lot. V. Development Standards for Other Permitted Uses For uses other than automobile dealerships the development standards shall be those contained in Subarea D of the Perimeter Center PUD as they exist on the date this rezoning is approved. MAG parkingAt (alu) 6/26/08 3 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Perimeter Center PCD Subarea Map I 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 MIDWESTERN AUTO GROUP (MAG) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD) December 18, 2009 I. Summary The subject site consists of 15.69± acres of real property bounded by Perimeter Drive to the north, U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161 to the south, Perimeter Loop Road to the west, and Venture Drive to the northeast. It currently contains an existing automobile dealership on 14.78± acres as well as a portion (0.91± acres) of an undeveloped parcel just to the east. The applicant is seeking to add additional square footage to the east end of its existing facility in order to accommodate its Volvo automobile franchise that will be relocated from another municipality. This expansion also will create new office space for the operations of the entire dealership. This PUD will permit the same uses and same development standards as are currently applicable to the property while making accommodations for the expansion of the dealership. II. Development Standards Unless otherwise set forth in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this PUD. III. Permitted Uses (A) The following uses shall be permitted in the PUD: (1) New and used automobile sales and service (2) General, administrative, and business office (3) Medical and dental office (4) Research, synthesis, analysis, development, and testing laboratories (5) Ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to automobile sales or service uses including, without limitation: (i) Automobile service (but not including auto body work) (ii) Retail sales of automobile parts and accessories (iii) Non - retail, coffee shops selling beverages and snack food items for 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 on- premises consumption (iv) Automobile rental services (6) One executive suite providing a single residential suite and related office space for the automobile dealership. (7) Detached non - retail car wash operated in association with automobile sales and /or service facilities. This car wash also shall be permitted to serve an automobile dealership located on the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD should such development occur. IV. Setback and Yard Requirements (A) Venture Drive: The minimum setback from the Venture Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (B) Perimeter Drive: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 65 feet for buildings. (C) State Route 161/U.S. Route 33: The minimum setback from the State Route 161/U.S. Route 33 right -of -way shall be 60 feet for pavement and buildings. (D) Perimeter Loop Roa d: The minimum setback from the Perimeter Drive right -of -way shall be 25 feet for pavement and 75 feet for buildings. (D) Eastern Boundary: For all portions of the eastern boundary line of this PUD that are not adjacent to Venture Drive, there shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of 25 feet as measured from the eastern boundary line. In the event that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD is rezoned to allow an automobile dealership use, then there shall be a zero setback requirement for both buildings and pavement from the eastern boundary line of this PUD. (E) Interior Propeg Lin es: There shall be no minimum setback requirements from interior property lines within this PUD. V. Parking, Loading, and Stacking Requirements (A) Number of Parking Spaces: The number of required parking spaces on this site shall be calculated as follows: (1) Parking for automobile dealership uses shall provide parking at the rate of 1 space per 300 square feet of building floor area for sales and related office uses, 09- 1087,/FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 per 1,000 square feet of outdoor display area, and parking at the rate of 3 spaces for each service bay for service uses. A single parking space shall be required to serve the executive suite. (2) Parking for uses other than what is accounted for in Section V(A)(1) of this text shall be provided in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. (B) Employee Parking_ Parking for employees of any permitted user shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 1611U.S. Route 33. (C) Automobile Storage: Automobile storage shall be located behind buildings so as to minimize visibility from State Route 161/U.S. Route 33 and shall be screened from the view of other public rights -of -way. For purposes of this text, the term "automobile storage" shall be defined to mean the storage of vehicles that are not intended for sales display but are instead awaiting service or removal to another location. (D) Loading Docks: Loading docks shall be fully screened from the view of adjacent rights -of -way and properties and shall be integrated into the architecture of the buildings. (E) Car Wash Stacking: There shall be no minimum automobile stacking requirement for the non - retail car wash. VI. Architecture (A) Building Height: The maximum height for the car wash shall be 25 feet and for all other structures shall be 65 feet as measured per the Dublin Zoning Code. (B) Design Intent: Existing architecture in this subarea is modern and innovative and features the extensive use of glass and metal to promote transparency and a sleek, signature look across the front of the buildings while emphasizing sharp edges and angles. The buildings are positioned to run parallel to and follow a crescent - shaped access drive that outlines the campus. The expansion of the larger building is to occur on its east side and is intended to create a visual focal point by enhancing the massing of the structure when compared to what currently exists on the property. The expansion of the building will implement a high quality of finish consistent with the architectural style and materials that are found throughout the property. (C) Plans: Architecture shall reflect the general design and character of the architectural drawings that accompany the preliminary development plan application. (D) Permitted Materials: Permitted primary exterior materials shall include glass, metal, EIFS, stone /stone veneer and concrete masonry units (CMU). 3 09- 108Z/FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 (E) Roofs: Flat roofs shall be permitted in this PUD. Metal roofs may be found on visible low -slope conditions and membrane roofing on flat roofs that are not visible to the public. VII. Landscaping and Screening (A) Landscaping_ All landscaping shall be in accordance with the Dublin Landscape Code unless otherwise specified herein. (B) Property Perimeter Screening: Along U.S. Route 33 /State Route 161, the site shall be required to provide an average of one tree per 40 feet of lineal frontage to meet the intent of the arterial screening requirement and shall be exempt from the 6 -foot tall continuous screening requirement, as referenced in Appendix A of the Dublin Zoning Code. (C) Display Space: An automobile dealership shall be permitted to display automobiles along a maximum of 40% of its property's lineal street frontage. (D) Eastern Perimeter Buffer: It is anticipated that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD will develop relatively shortly after this application is approved. Therefore, the property perimeter buffering requirements of the Dublin Zoning Code shall be waived along the eastern boundary of this PUD. In the event that the property to the east of and adjacent to this PUD has not developed with a use that is compatible with an automobile dealership on or before the third anniversary of the effective date of the approval of the preliminary development plan for this PUD, then a plan showing the details of the proposed buffering to be installed along the eastern boundary line of this PUD and adherence to the perimeter buffering requirements of the Dublin Zoning Code shall be submitted and installed by the applicant, subject to approval by Planning. (E) Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence. (F) Storage and Equipment: No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside of permitted structures. (G) Mechanicals: All roof - mounted or ground mounted mechanical units shall be screened from the view of all rights -of -way adjacent to the site. VIII. Signs (A) Design Intent: This site is unique in that it has frontage on four separate public 4 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 roads and utilizes three widely dispersed vehicular access points, creating a need for a comprehensive sign plan. The current approved sign package for this site recognizes the development of the property with a campus -like feel and accomplishes the goals of providing identification of the various automobile manufacturers offering vehicles for sale on the site, identifying the dealership itself, and providing ample directional signage to allow customers and visitors to identify sales and service areas for different product types. The intent behind the sign standards in this text is to continue to utilize this same package while maintaining some limited flexibility to accommodate future changes to manufacturer types. (B) Alteration of Signs: Sign panels that identify automobile manufacturers on ground signs may be changed without further review by the Planning Commission provided that verification of the new panel's conformance with this text is made through the sign permitting process, or as otherwise specified herein. (C) Sign Plan: Signage for automobile dealership uses shall be in accordance with this text and that which is approved as a part of a final development plan. Signage for all other permitted uses shall be in accordance with the City of Dublin Zoning Code. For purposes of this text, signs shall be placed into one of five categories, for which separate standards are set forth below. These categories are: (1) Campus identification signs (2) Dealership identification signs (3) Directional signs (4) Brand signs (5) Wall signs (D) Standards Applicable to All Sign Types: The following standards shall apply to all signs in the PUD, regardless of how they are categorized: (1) Materials: All signs shall consist of materials that are complimentary to and of a similar quality as the buildings found in this PUD. (2) Interior Signs: Signs located on the interior of buildings shall be permitted provided that they are not more than 3 feet in height and are not readily visible from rights -of -way that are adjacent to the site. (3) Illumination: All signs found on the outside of buildings shall be externally illuminated. (4) Prohibited signs and displace The following types of signs and displays shall be prohibited outside of buildings: 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 (a) Balloons, flags, streamers, metallic wind vanes and similar visual attractions (b) Painting or other types of surface graphics displaying prices, slogans, or other advertising, except (i) as included on informational stickers provided by the manufacturer and (ii) a two -digit graphic shall be permitted on the windshield of used cars to indicate the year the car was made, provided that such graphic does not exceed 5 inches by 6 inches in size. (c) Logos and/or signs located on the interior of a building that is easily readable from an adjacent public right -of -way shall not be permitted without approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission (E) Campus Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to campus identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "campus identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located at a major vehicular access point to the property from an adjacent public roadway and that identifies the name of the automobile dealership and all or some of the automotive brands that are sold from that dealership. (2) Number: A maximum of two campus identification signs shall be permitted. (3) Location: One campus identification sign shall be permitted at the site entrances into the PUD from Perimeter Loop Road and another shall be permitted to the southeast of the intersection of Perimeter Drive and Venture Drive. (4) Overall Size: Each campus identification sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height and a maximum of 30 inches in width. (5) Panels: Each campus identification sign shall be permitted a maximum of 6 sign panels for the purpose of identifying the automobile manufacturers whose vehicles are being sold on -site. (6) Sign Area: Sign panels identifying automobile manufacturers shall be no greater than 1.5 square feet in area. The portion of the sign identifying the name of the automobile dealership shall not exceed 5.5 square feet in area. (7) Logos: The display of automobile manufacturers' logos shall be permitted on 6 09- 108ZIFDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 sign panels. Logos may exceed size limits set forth in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. (8) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to utilize three colors. (F) Dealership Identification Signs: The following standards shall apply to dealership identification signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "dealership identification sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located along the property's frontage on State Route 161/U.S Route 33 and/or a wall sign located at the building's main office entrance that serves to identify the name of the automobile dealership that is operating within the PUD. (2) Number: A maximum of two dealership identification sign shall be permitted. (3) Location: One ground sign shall be permitted along the State Route 161/US Route 33 frontage and one wall shall be permitted at the entrance to building's main office. (4) Overall Height: The ground sign shall be a maximum of 46 inches in height and a maximum of 32 inches in width. The wall sign shall be a maximum of 15 feet in height, as measured from grade. (5) Content: The dealership identification sign shall identify the name of the automobile dealership. No logos or identification of an automobile manufacturer shall be permitted. (6) Sign Area: The maximum area of the sign face for the ground sign shall be 17 square feet. The maximum area of the wall sign shall be 21 square feet. (7) Any modifications to the location of the dealership identification ground sign greater than 10 feet from the existing location or the movement of the wall sign to a location visible from an adjacent right -of -way shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (G) Directional Signs: The following standards shall apply to directional signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "directional sign" shall be defined as a ground sign used for the purpose of directing customers and other 09- 108Z/FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 visitors to various destinations on the campus, including service area signs. (2) Location: Directional signs shall be permitted internal to the site. Additional directional signs shall be allowed without an amendment to the final development plan if they are 3 feet or less in height and are not easily visible from an adjacent public right -of -way. (3) Size: Each directional sign shall be permitted either a maximum of 55 inches in height and a maximum of 42 inches in width, or an area of 16 square feet (H) Brand Signs The following standards shall apply to branding signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "brand sign" shall be defined as a ground sign located between the front fagade of the primary building in this PUD and the parking lot and identifying a single automobile manufacturer whose products are being sold in the building. (2) Location and Type: Brand signs shall be permitted adjacent to the individual brand sales entrances. Any additional brand signs on the site shall require approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission as a part of an amended final development plan. (3) Size: Brand signs shall be permitted with the following size limitations: (a) Sign Type A such as signs labeled K, L, N and O): Maximum height shall be 40 inches and maximum width shall be 72 inches for sign identifying a single brand. (b) Sign Type B (such as sign labeled M): If multiple brands are identified at the same entrance, the overall sign may exceed 20 square feet in area, but each individual brand sign shall be limited to 6 square feet in area. The overall height shall not exceed 40 inches. (4) Content: Each brand sign shall be permitted to display the name and /or logo of a single automobile manufacturer. Logos shall not exceed 50 percent of the maximum permitted area of the sign face. (5) Colors: Each individual sign panel shall be permitted to contain three colors, not including black and white or the sign background, only in the event that the standard logo of the automobile manufacturer is being displayed and such logo contains more than three colors. 09- 108Z/FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT Submitted for Planning and Zoning Commission 1/7/10 (I) Wall Signs: The following standards shall apply to wall signs: (1) Definition: For purposes of this zoning text, a "wall sign" shall be defined to have the same meaning as provided in the Dublin Zoning Code. (2) Number; Location: Two wall signs shall be permitted in this PUD. One shall be located on the north fagade of the northernmost building in this PUD. This sign shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. The second shall be found on the building expansion on the eastern side of the property. This sign also shall identify a single brand of automobile that is being offered for sale from this building. (3) Height: Wall signs shall not exceed 25 feet in height. (4) Sign Area: Each wall sign shall not exceed a maximum area of 35 square feet. (5) Logos: The display of an automobile manufacturer's logo shall be permitted on the wall sign. IX. Lighting (A) Lighting for this campus shall be consistent in look and feel throughout the PUD. (B) Unless otherwise set forth in this text or approved as a part of a final development plan, lighting shall conform to the standards of the Dublin City Code. (C) Light fixtures shall be installed at a maximum height of 28 feet and may include 400 watt lamps. (D) Lighting poles and fixtures shall be consistent in color and appearance throughout the site and shall be dark in color and constructed of dark brown, black, or bronze metal. (E) External lighting shall utilize cut -off type fixtures. (F) Cut -off type landscape and building uplighting shall be permitted. No color lights shall be permitted to illuminate the exterior of a building. (G) All lights shall be arranged to minimize light trespass onto adjacent properties. 9 09- 108Z/FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Road The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1— MAG Parking Lot Venture Drive 08- 093FDP /CU Final Development Plan/ Conditional Use Proposal: A stand -alone parking lot located in Subarea J -1 of the Perimeter Center Planned District located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 700 feet south of the intersection with Perimeter Drive. Request: Review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050 and a conditional use under the provisions of Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Tim Galli; represented by Aaron L. Underhill, Smith and Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Jonathan Papp, Planner I. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4683, jpapp @dublin.oh.us RESULT: This case was postponed prior the meeting, no action was taken. STAFF CERTIFICATION a an Papp Planner I 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION LWW Lin Cnd November 6, 2008 L" K.-Wv 11a-ft 58W Shim -Pings Rood C3obK G7h, AW 6 -1236 Phonel IDD: 614- 410-46W Fax.: 614.4144747 '+vets Sf1 : vwnw.dublhoh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1— MAG Parking Lot Venture Drive 08- 093FDP /CU Final Development Plan/ Conditional Use Proposal: A stand -alone parking lot located in Subarea J -1 of the Perimeter Center Planned District located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 700 feet south of the intersection with Perimeter Drive. Request: Review and approval of a final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050 and a conditional use under the provisions of Code Section 153.236. Applicant: Tim Galli; represented by Aaron L. Underhill, Smith and Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Jonathan Papp, Planner I. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4683, jpapp @dublin.oh.us RESULT: This case was postponed prior the meeting, no action was taken. STAFF CERTIFICATION a an Papp Planner I 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission November 6, 2008 —Minutes Page 11 of 17 12) TV proposed use of a rlow taxus be subs ' ted with holly alo the front of the X 1 residential units; an The front doors door hardware be 'ect to Administrati view by Plannin d the Planning d Zoning Commissi prior to approval. Ms. Arnorose mes seconded the Lion. The vote was follows: Mr. Frei ann, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes; s. Kramb, yes; Mr. lter, yes; Mr. Fishm , yes; Ms. Amorose oomes, yes; and Mr. Zi an, yes. (Approv 7 — 0.) 2. Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1— MAG Parldng Lot Venture Drive 08- 093FDP /CU Final Development Plan/ Conditional Use This case was postponed prior to the meeting. Property owners were notified. There was no discussion or vote taken. Zoning Code A5wlfidments dministrative Re rtions est 08- 095ADM toning Code Modif' Mr. Zimmerman ounced that this w an administrative m er and that the publi as welcome to express the' opinion during the p is comment portio the hearing. T oble- Flading said s Administrative R est for proposed Z g Code modifica " w initiated by Plannin d originally prese to the Conunissio n October 9, 2008 i order o address several zo ' g issues. The Co 'ssion took action several of the prop ed Code modifications and led issues includi a modification rel d to Performance G antees. She stated that the oposed Code modi Lion related to Perfb ance Guarantees we ased on issues of ensunn ompliance with zo ' g regulations. She they are issues not ently covered by any of bonding process er through the En ' eering Department any other departure thr gh the City of Dub ' Ms. Noble -Flad' said Planning is meting to have vial reassurances from dev pers at the early s s of the process, to ure that any type of enities that the Commissi requires are implem ed in a develop men roject in a timely er. Ms. Noble- tiding said the propo d modifications dese ' e the purpose of th egulations, as well as whe a requirements wil a imposed on the d eloper. She stated t our instances ha bee ' cluded that would mpt this kind of rev" process. She said o will be when the ' e is o upied prior to the zoning compliance ' pection, the third in ce includes when Ite will include a portable cture, and the fo would be any time a Commission or er Board imposes a cond' ' n that would require ancial security as of the approval pr ess. Ms. No - Flading said the re i ed bonding process ' 00 percent of the p osed improvement as d rmined by the devel r. The estimates pr ided would then be ewed and approv y P ing. She said at time of the Buil ' Permit issuance, P g would Bete a the eatures that would subject to this b ing process and amounts associate ith each improvement. proposed Code 1 age also states th fan applicant doe of make the required impr ements after compli ce is attempted by City, the City of D in would notify the applic and there would be 15 -day period befor a finances would secured by the City, and us to complete the im ovements. Any re g balance of the b6nd, or other methoif fin vial security, will be ed to the develo 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS u 1. September 2, 2008 0 Page 4 Ordinanc -08 Adopts the 2009 -2013 Five Yea spits! Improvements Pr ra m. Ms. autigam stated that the d menu have been finalize , as on the workshop s signs. The staff report kil s the items discussed d ' g the workshops. There y� o changes directed by C during the sessions. Vote on the Or i a : Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kpfan, yes; Vice Mayor 13> yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuerch , yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr, ecklider, es. Information wa rovided from thZP[annin ff. There were further q uestions. Vote on Ordinance: Mr. Leckr. Reiner, yes; Mr. enan, yes; Mayor Chin ' kZuercher, yes; Mr. Germ Mayor Boring, s. r Ordlnan 6 -0t3 Rezo g Approximately 0.31 Al Located on the South . e of Bridge Street, at the outheast Corner of the I ersection with Franklin eat from: PUD, Plann it Development District ,ATown Center II) to: PUD armed Unit Develvpm DlstricL (Town Center II evised —Case No. 08 04 FDP) Ms. Brautigam stated at Mr. Langworthy can re and to any questions on matter. Mayor Chinnici -Z Cher noted that a staff pr ntation took place at the t meeting, and Ordinance 57 -08 Rezoning Approximately 2.1 Acres Located on the South Side of Venture Drive, Approximately 800 Feet Southwest of the Intersection with Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1 — Case No. 03 -1122) Ms. Brautigam stated that Ms. Husak is present to respond to any further questions from Council regarding this matter. There were no further questions. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Boring, yes. Ordinance 60 -08 Amending Cha r 132 of the Codified O nances of the City of lin by Enacting a New Sects , Making an Exception owing for the Firing of ank Ammunition when Co ucted In Conjunction w a Funeral, Patriotic Ev t, or Such Other Ac vi as Specifically Author by the City Manager o e City Manager's De nee. Brautigam stated that t ' Code amendment is bra ht to Council in follow -u a group who requested a gun salute as part of a p ctic event at a local hot .Staff felt ie City Code d have the City Manager ake the S. inic' uercher, yes; Mr. Gerbe es; Mr. Lecklider, yes; S,; Mr. Keenan, yes. IRST READING — ORDINAN Ordinance 69 -08 f' Amending Section ig(>ersonal Leave), Seat 11 (Sick Leave), Sec#Io 2 (Vacation Leave),ct 13 (Paid Time Off r Employees In Part -Ti a Permanent Positions), and ection 15 (Insurance B fits) of Ordinance No. -O6 ( "Compensa n Plan ") for Non- Unlorp mployees). Mr. Leckii introduced the ordinancw.. Ms. autigam stated that Cou held an Administrative mmittee of the Whole m ing P r to the Council meeting August 18. Proposed C gas to the City's leave ram were discussed in depth, r. Harding is present to cuss the ordinance intr oed tonight, which would into effect the changesssed at the Commute eating. Mr. Harding sta that as directed by CCU staff prepared legislate changes pro sad at the Committee oft Whole meeting on Aug 09- 1082 /FDP includes a cap of the areas prop or changes. Some qua ons Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J — MAG — Porsche 6325 Perimeter Loop 08- 073AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Proposal: External building modifications and a wall sign for a portion of an existing automobile sales and service establishment located within Subarea J of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District, located on the east side of Perimeter Loop Road, at the intersection with Mercedes Drive Request: Review and approval of amended final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Tim Galli; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale. Planning Contact: Jonathan Papp, Planner. Contact Information (614) 410 -4683, jpapp @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To disapprove this Amended Final Development Plan because this proposal does not comply with the amended final development plan criteria or the existing development standards within the area. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan was disapproved. STAFF CERTIFICATION nad= Papp Planner 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN_ Lwd Lem � AUGUST 21, 2008 SWO Shia Axp Road Dublin. Ohio 43016.1436 Phase/ TDD: 614 - 4104600 Fm 614-410.4747 Web Sile: www.dubinoh.us Creadng a Legacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J — MAG — Porsche 6325 Perimeter Loop 08- 073AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Proposal: External building modifications and a wall sign for a portion of an existing automobile sales and service establishment located within Subarea J of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District, located on the east side of Perimeter Loop Road, at the intersection with Mercedes Drive Request: Review and approval of amended final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Tim Galli; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale. Planning Contact: Jonathan Papp, Planner. Contact Information (614) 410 -4683, jpapp @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To disapprove this Amended Final Development Plan because this proposal does not comply with the amended final development plan criteria or the existing development standards within the area. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan was disapproved. STAFF CERTIFICATION nad= Papp Planner 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 21, 2008 — Minutes Page 5 of 19 Motion Vote Tod tmmerman made the otion to approve this ender proposal is con ' ent with the s ds and rezoning(prelimin evelopment plan and h the amended forth in Section .050 of the Dublin Z n Code with the f Final Deve ment Plan because conditio approved with final velopment plan crit ' set ing two conditions: imatelv ten feet av from the 1) That thZp1maternial, cles be moved bencheetball court; 2) That th partic con Mr. Hahn The vote 1 yes; M;A pIr to the two 4 as follows: Mr. )r, yes; Ms. Ami itio as listed above. yes; Mr. Saneh Groomes, yes; and V.. Yellow Birch, b4,1 1 eevaluated for b RO&d Taylor secondedfiT6 motion. yes; Mr. Walter, ye • r. Fishman, Zimmerman, yes. pproved 7 — 0.) 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J — MAG — Porsche 6325 Perimeter Loop 08- 073AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Todd Zimmerman swore in the applicant's representative, Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, City representatives, and all others who wished to speak in regard to this case. Jonathan Papp presented this request for review and approval of an amended final development plan to permit exterior modifications and a wall sign on a portion of the MAG (Midwestern Auto Group) dealership building. He said that the 14 -acre site within Subarea J was created in 1998, especially for auto dealerships. He said the 7,335- square 400t Land Rover building to the north faces Perimeter Drive and a second, 57,355- square -foot building to the south is oriented. toward Perimeter Loop Road and - SR 161/US 33. Mr. Papp said parking is located on all sides of the building. Mr. Papp said the existing main building includes three angled showrooms for the primary vehicle brands sold at MAG. He said each of the dealership pods is designed to match and provide continuity and cohesiveness to this innovatively designed building. Mr. Papp said the development text considers "box -like" buildings to be undesirable within the subarea. He said this same plan was informally reviewed by the Commission in July, with the Commission offering feedback about the fagade changes and the additional wall sign. Mr. Papp said the applicant has chosen to proceed with the application with no changes to the proposal. Mr. Papp said the Porsche dealership occupies the northern portion of the main building which has showrooms and sales areas slightly elevated above grade and service level areas that are partially below grade. He said the existing design of the building is unique with the three main showrooms mirroring the layout of the vehicle display pods by extending from the main building fagade at angles. He said to accommodate the modifications for Porsche, the northern angled showroom portion would be replaced with a curved wall slightly taller than the remaining walls. Mr. Papp said the Perimeter Center Planned Commercial District development text requires striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture and states that box -like buildings will not be considered as a use of right. He said the MAG building was designed with a cohesive theme of prominent angled showrooms constructed of glass. He said while this proposal includes a slight curve in the proposed design, the Porsche building tends to resemble a box -like structure. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Lonn Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 21, 2008 — Minutes Page 6 of 19 Mr. Papp said the text permits the four existing signs, one at each of the three entrances to the site, and one facing US 33. Internally oriented directional signs are also permitted for the site as are vehicle brand identification signs interior to the site. He said the plan proposes a 33- square- foot Porsche red wall sign with the Porsche brand on the building as shown on the illustration. He said no other vehicle brands were approved for wall signs along the main building facade. Mr. Papp said this proposed amended final development plan does not meet the applicable review criteria. He said this proposal does not conform to the preliminary development plan or development text for the area in regards to offering "striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture" or that "a dealership with box -like buildings will not be considered a use of right." This modification interrupts the cohesive architectural style that has been created on the site by significantly altering the very form that makes the design innovative, and "non -box" like. He added that a wall sign in this portion of the site would not be in character with the rest of the building. Mr. Papp said therefore, Planning recommends disapproval of this proposed amended final development text as submitted. Mr. Hale said the Commission's input from the last meeting was communicated to the Porsche dealers, but they asked him to file this application because they wanted a vote taken. Mr. Freimann said he had missed the Work Session and he asked why they went with the box. Mr. Hale said that was what Porsche wanted to do. Mr. Saneholtz confirmed that the manufacturer was prompting this structure. He explained that the same thing had been experience with a Hummer dealership, as well as conversations with BMW over brand image, international proclamations of manufacturers from overseas, basically trying to impose their corporate will upon our community. He said in the past, the Commission stood fast that this community was unique in itself, and the fact that we can still govern ourselves locally is treasured. He said this particular application simply does not meet the intent of the local authorities as far as what they envision for this property and he hoped that Porsche would respect that. Mr. Zimmerman and Ms. Amorose Groomes agreed that this proposal had been discussed at the Work Session and nothing had changed. Motion and Vote Mr. Zimmerman made a motion to disapprove this Amended Final Development Plan because it does not meet the Adopted Policies and Plans and the Development Details review criteria and is not consistent with development standards in the area. Ms. Amorose Groomes seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Taylor, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Freimann, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Disapproved 7 — 0.) WORK SESSION Mr. Zimmerman explained the Work Session purpose and procedures. He advised that all comments made by the Commission are informal and non - binding, and are intended only to provide general guidance to the applicant regarding the application. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS lirauts_ Dublin Cit Counci -Wetin - - - -_ __ D�fjYID'1 LE�/J gLAN INC FOPN VQ�1 1 �i Held Id August 18, 2008 Page 11 2 �i TXre will be a second reog/public hearing at th5,9eptember 2 Council meting. Ordinance 57 -08 Rezoning Approximately 2.1 Acres Located on the South Side of Venture Drive, Approximately 801) Peet Southwest of the Intersection with Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center, Subarea D) to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Perimeter Center, Subarea J -1 - Case No. 03 - 1122) Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Ms. Husak stated that this proposal is for a free-standing parking lot to serve the existing Midwestern Auto Group car dealership within Subarea D of the Perimeter Center PCID. PZC reviewed this proposal informally on June 19 and recommended approval of the proposal at the July 17 meeting. She noted the following: 1. The MAG dealership exists to the west of this site. It is located in Subarea J of the PCD. The land to the east and south is undeveloped. To the north is the Perimeter Center office district. 2. The applicant is proposing to amend the development text for a portion of Subarea D to create a new subarea to be called Subarea J -1. This subarea would continue to allow the uses approved for Subarea D - Suburban Office and Institutional district and office, Laboratory and Research district - as well as a free- standing parking lot for 191 spaces for parking for employees and vehicle storage for the car dealership in Subarea J. 3. The applicant is currently exploring a building expansion for the MAG dealership in Subarea J, and this prompts the need for an additional parking lot. 4. The PZC discussion centered around whether or not it was appropriate to require a conditional use to allow for further review of this proposal. The development text as proposed does reflect that a conditional use would be required to allow this tot to exist. 5. The proposal is for a new subarea within Perimeter Center PCD for 2.21 acres with frontage along Venture Drive. There are two access points which are internal to the existing MAG dealership. There are no access points off of the public road. 6. The text as well as the preliminary development plan indicates 191 parking snares_ The text limits thic to employee parking and vehicle storage. There is no display or sales of vehicles permitted. Planning's review indicates that all criteria are met and that the traffic issues and stormwater management criteria may be met with the condition approved by the PZC. Staff is recommending approval at the second readingipublic hearing on September 2, with the one condition as noted in the staff report. Mayor Chinnici - Zuercher asked if MAG owns all of the area in Subarea D. Secondly, regarding the landscaping, it appears from the renderings that the landscaping would meet only the minimum Code requirements. Ms. Husak responded that the preliminary development plan indicates where the pavement will be located; the landscaping will be required to meet Code and will be reviewed by the Commission at the final development plan stage. The screening and buffering required would have to be identified in that plan. Mayor Chinnici - Zuercher stated that this issue has been a recurring one with all auto dealerships in Dublin, and none have been held accountable to meeting the landscaping code requirements. The dealership along Sawmill is not meeting the Code for landscaping. Ms. Husak responded that there are some exception for car dealerships when they are selling cars that allows a reduction in these items. Mayor Chinnici - Zuercher noted that the Cadillac dealership on Sawmill was required as part of an expansion several years ago to build mounds and do landscaping as outlined in the text. This has not been done and they are not being held accountable. The City needs to be consistent in holding card dealerships accountable in view of the amount of asphalt on their sites. Ms. Husak responded that staff will pay particular attention to that. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minuta Dublin City Council Heid August 18.2tt'Q8 Meeting Page 12 _ _ 7f) Vice Mayor Boring noted that the Sawmill Road auto dealership never let the landscaping grow to the height that was committed to. This plan before Council tonight has deficient landscaping at the outset, as shown on the plans. Ben Hale. Jr.. 37 W. Broad Street stated that the real estate of Subarea J, the location of the existing dealership, is actually owned by a REIT out of Atlanta. MAG owns the business and leases the buildings from the REIT. Subarea D is owned by a corporation that is a subsidiary of the MAG dealership. Therefore, the MAG dealership or an associated company actually owns all of Subarea D, which consists of 15 acres. Vice Mayor Boring noted that an applicant who wants to construct a building has to meet parking requirements. If the parking requirements do not meet what is required by the building, typically, the applicant is instructed to make the building smaller. If MAG expands their building, this results in a need for parking in another location? She is confused with the process. Ms. Husak responded that during the construction of an anticipated expansion, which has not been approved by P&Z, there will be a need for vehicle storage for employees. The site does meet Code in terms of parking and will continue to do so if the expansion is approved and built. Planning understands this as more related to the needs during construction and a potential requirement of the franchisee to have a certain level of inventory. Mr. Hale clarified that MAG recently purchased the Volvo dealership, currently located in Linworth. They want to bring it to this location. A revised final development plan would allow Volvo to come to this location. Because of the construction that will occur, the site will be disrupted. The owner made it clear to the Planning Commission that if they saw fit, he would be willing to have this be a temporary lot. It was the applicant's attorneys' position that under the current zoning of the property, the applicant could build this lot with a conditional use. There is language that allows a non - attached, free standing lot in association with a permitted use. Staff did not agree with this position and so the applicant filed a rezoning. The owner has also indicated that if necessary, he would make this site work without these additional parking spaces. However, it would require mixing employee parking with guest parking and car display areas. Operationally, this is not desirable. The applicant made it clear to the Commission that they would do this as a temporary lot, but the Commission focused more on having a first -class lot, with landscaping, etc., in case it becomes a permanent lot. His associate, Mr. Underhill rewrote the first draft of this ordinance allowing a car dealership on J -1. He had this portion removed to avoid any misunderstanding. If there is to be any additional car dealership on this part of Subarea D, the applicant must come back to rezone it. What the applicant is asking tonight is to allow this lot to be used for employee parking and some storage of overflow cars. They are pursuing a minimal change to the zoning to allow them to ask the Commission for a conditional use. They will meet all of the landscaping requirements in the Code. There will be a second reading /public hearing on September 2. Ordina 58 -08 Auth zing the City Manage o Enter into an Agree nt to Purchase a 03 'Acres, Mo or Less, Fee Simple erect, and a .0(i1 Acr More or Less, Temp rry nstruction Easement om Robert G. and Ja Mi Eickholt, Said Acrgd�e Located on Sawmill Road, Ju outh of the Intersect' of Sawmill and HargAoads, and Declaring an Emer ncy. Mr. Lecldider intr aced the ordinance. Mr. Smith stat at this was drafted as resolution for the /derto ting and because it involved Ian urchase, it has been r sed to an ordinancerchase price is the appraised rice, and staff is reque g emergency action in proceed with c lo 9, Mr- Kenan asked if the City t ks the value of the im to .ion. S. Grigsby responded t they will have the tot right -of -way acquisitio nd construction costs. ivements being ins his of the project av 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN- JULY 17, 2008 L=W Use and Long Raga Plondip 5800 SNw-Rk gs Road Dublin. ONo 63016 -1 Z6 Phone/ 1DD: 614 - 4104600 Fax: 61 44104747 Web SRe: www.dubfin.ohm Cm kft a Legacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Perimeter Center, Subarea D — MAG Parking Lot Venture Drive 03 -112Z Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Proposal: A stand -alone parking lot to serve an existing car dealership within Subarea D of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District, located on the south side of Venture Drive, approximately 800 feet southeast of the intersection with Perimeter Drive. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning/preliminary development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Brentlinger Real Estate Co.; represented by Smith and Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675; chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: To recommend to City Council approval of this Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan because the proposal is compatible with the development pattern in this area and complies with the preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area with one conditions: 1) That the applicant provide a stormwater management report for the site that complies with the City's stormwater management and stream protection Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer. *Ben Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, representing the applicant, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. STAFF CERTIFICATION a� Q A Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II o o N b s�. 0 0 a w v7 M M Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 17, 2008 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 39 2. Perimeter Center, Subarea D — MAG Parking Lot Venture Drive 03 -112Z Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Claudia Husak presented this rezoning application She said the plan is for a parking lot to serve the existing Midwestern Auto Group car dealership within Subarea D of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District. She reminded the Commissioners of their previous informal comments on the application during the June 19, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, namely requesting that an alternate location be chosen for the parking lot which would place it further away from the US 33 frontage. Ms. Husak pointed out that the new proposal locates the parking lot along Venture Drive at an east -west orientation Ms. flusak described the surrounding uses and explained that the property is located in Subarea D, while the MAG dealership is located in Subarea J. She said the applicant was proposing to rezone the subject property in Subarea D to a new Subarea, to be called J -1. Subarea J -1 would permit the same uses as Subarea D, but also allow for a stand -alone parking lot for employees and vehicle inventory. Ms. Husak explained that plans for an expansion of the MAG dealership would create a need for this parking lot. Ms. Husak also said that the development text indicates that a conditional use would be required for the parking lot to exist. Ms. Husak displayed the proposed preliminary development plan and explained that Subarea J -1 would be approximately 2.21 acres with a majority of frontage on Venture Drive. She said the plan and text show a maximum of 191 parking and storage spaces. She said that access is limited through the MAG. site and that the development text does not allow for vehicle display. Ms. Husak spoke about the Commission's previous discussions regarding environmentally - friendly pavement options, but said that the applicant had not addressed this issue in their application She explained that Planning had created a condition which would require the applicant to utilize pervious pavement in their final development plan. Ms. Husak said that in reviewing the criteria for a preliminary development plan, Planning found that all were met excluding the criterion for traffic utilities and storm water management. She explained that this criterion could be met with two proposed conditions. She said the Planning is recommending approval with two conditions: 1) That the applicant provide a stormwater management report for the site that complies with the City's stormwater management and stream protection Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer; and 2) That the development text be revised to require pervious pavement for this site. Ben Hale Jr., representative for the applicant, explained that the MAG dealership would begin work on their building and that they would require temporary additional parking. He said that the applicant's intent was not to create a larger lot for car sales, but to have an area for parking for approximately 145 employees and some vehicle storage overflow during MAG construction Mr. Hale said the conditional use would allow the Planning and Zoning Commission to place a time limit on the parking lot and that it was intended to be temporary in nature. He explained that the applicant did not feel they would have any issues screening the lot from US 33 now that it was 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 17, 2008 — Meeting 1Vfimutes Page 7 of 39 oriented along Venture Drive. Mr. Hale also explained that access was internal and that there would- be no curb cuts onto Venture Drive. Mr. Freiman expressed confusion regarding the temporary nature of the parking lot. He discussed MAG's intentions to expand northward, and questioned whether or not the dealership would be in need of parking spaces after this construction. Mr. Hale Jr. said that the site would meet Code for parking after the expansion. He also discussed the need for MAG to relocate its BMW dealership due to the future .Frantz Road improvements. Mr. Hale said MAG would potentially like to move BMW to this site. Mr. Walter wanted to clarify that the applicant would vacate the proposed lot when an occupancy permit was issued for the future MAG construction. Ms. Husak said that it was Planning's impression that parking spaces would still be needed after the future construction was complete. Ms. Amorose Groomes felt that in the future the proposed lot would still be necessary for MAG to meet their parking requirements. She had difficultly labeling the lot as temporary and did not feel it would be logical to construct the lot as a temporary one. Mr. Hale Jr. said that the lot was being proposed as temporary, but that the owner would like to have a permanent lot. Mr. John Oney, Architectural Alliance, confirmed that in the end MAG would lose parking spaces. He said that with the proposed future MAG construction and the temporary lot, the site would have 698 spaces. Mr. Oney predicted that this parking not may be sufficient during the business' busiest times. He said that in the long -range sense the applicant would like this lot to be permanent. Mr. Saneholtz felt that the applicants were contradicting themselves and at the last meeting had said the lot would be purely temporary in nature. He said that he was now hearing that the applicant might need this lot to be permanent. He was concerned that if the future MAG construction were not to take place, the lot would remain for an extended period of time. Ms. Husak said that this would depend on conditions placed on the conditional use concerning future evaluation of the lot. Mr. Saneholtz confirmed that this preliminary plan did not give the applicant permission to construct the lot. Ms. Husak agreed and said that the applicant would need to receive conditional use and final development plan approval from the Commission before the lot could be constructed. Mr. Hale Jr. said the only intention was to give the applicant the right to have the parking lot, and that the temporary or permanent nature of the lot was not as important at this juncture. Mr. Freiman said he saw a need for additional parking as opposed to a desire for it, and that the lot should possibly be permanent. Ms. Amorose Groomes felt that it was not environmentally or civically responsible to pave this area and then demolish it in the f ftre. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 17, 2008 — Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 39 Mr. Walter asked how long the construction would last. Mr. Oney replied that the construction would be a maximum of 18 months. Mr. Hale Jr. explained that the lot was being requested first because it would need to be there before construction on the dealership began. Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that the Commission wanted to help MAG in their expansion and business, but that their decision needed to be weighed against the good of the community. She expressed that she would like to see the parking lot constructed in a permanent fashion so that it was built right the first time. Mr. Walter was disappointed that the leading edge of the business was a parking lot and agreed with Ms. Amorose Groomes. He said the lot should be permanent and constructed with architectural integrity and well integrated into the rest of the site. Mr. Tim Galli of Midwestern Auto Group reiterated that the dealership needs extra parking during their future construction. He said that after construction, the parking lot would be tight but that they would not need as many spaces as the proposed lot would provide. He explained that they would be willing to put a time frame on the lot. He said MAG's hope was that they would be permitted to move the BMW dealership to this site. He explained that if the Commission disapproved moving BMW/Mini to the site, they would be forced to disperse their employees and offices. He explained that if this were the end result, MAG would return the site to its original state. Mr. Galli said that even if BMW/Mini were to move to the site, they would most likely be forced to remove at least fifty percent of the lot. Mr. Taylor said that there seemed to be in agreement, and that if BMW/Mini were not to move to this site the parking lot could be used. He said if this were the case it should be designed correctly now. Mr. Taylor said the current proposal seemed like it could be nothing more than temporary because the remaining frontage in front of US 33 would not be large enough for a building. Mr. Hale Jr. said they were attempting to respond to the Commission's concern that the lot was too close to US 33. Mr. Taylor said that if BMW/Mini .were to move to this site and the applicant were to request demolition of the parking lot, he would rather this proposal be implemented as opposed to the previous submission. Mr. Walter confirmed that the landscaping details would be presented at the final development plan. Ms. Husak said this was correct. Mr. Walter asked if the applicant owned the property to the east of the site. Mr. Hale Jr. said a MAG dealership entity owned the site under consideration and approximately ten acres around it. Ms. Husak explained which lots were owned by MAO. Mr. Galli confirmed that MAG owned all the land between the existing dealership and Nationwide Children's Hospital through a company called Brentlinger Real Estate. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 17, 2008 — Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 39 Mr. Walter said that there was more room for MAG to expand and reiterated that they would like to see the site designed as something more permanent. Mr. Oney said that this was difficult due to uncertainty of BWM/Mini's relocation. He explained that there was a good likelihood that BMW/Mini would arrive and use the sites which front on US 33. He said that much of the changes to the site plan were in response to Commission's comments regarding US 33 frontage. He also discussed the possible architectural style of future buildings and their willingness to screen the parking lot from the highway. Mr. Walter asked how much of the parking lot would need to be removed for future development. Mr. Oney said fifty percent would need to be removed. Mr. Zimmerman asked if this was fifty percent of the proposed lot. Mr. Oney described parts of the lot which would need to be removed and said it in the best scenario they would keep it all. Mr. Zimmerman said that if this lot was going to be built it should be done once in a permanent fashion. He asked which layout scenario was better for development. Mr. Oney said that the current plan which oriented the lot east to west along Venture was the best option for future building placement. Mr. Freiman expressed concern that there were competing interests and asked again if the lot was intended to be permanent or temporary. He said that if there was potential for this to be a permanent lot, he would like to see the lot done correctly. Mr. Taylor said he would like to see an attractive lot with trees and screening in case nothing is built in the future. He assumed that if new construction were to take place along US 33, the lot would be altered regardless. Steve Langworthy said that it appeared that a conceptual master plan was needed for the rest of the property so that Planning and the Commission could have a better grasp on MAG's vision. Ms. Amorose Groomes expressed concern that this would be time consuming and delay MAG's business. Mr. Langworthy clarified that this plan was only allowing the possibility of parking lot construction and this would give them time to submit a master plan. Mr. Walter questioned whether or not this parcel was large enough to have adequate screening. Ms. Husak confirmed there was approximately thirty feet and there was adequate space. Mr. Hale Jr. said that he felt the best option for a permanent lot was the design presented tonight. Mr. Walter said he was not inclined to support a conditional use and he would prefer the text be changed to allow for a permanent parking lot. Mr. Langworthy explained that the applicant would need to come back later with plans for the lot, and that they were approving the use and not the lot itself. Mr. Freimann expressed that, like Mr. Walter, he would like to approve the lot and not have the applicant come back for a conditional use. Ms. Husak explained that the conditional use would 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 17, 2008 — Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 39 not necessarily have to tie the use of the lot to a time limit and that the use could simply be approved without a time limit. Mr. Langworthy said that this rezoning would give the applicant the option for a parking lot use. The applicant would then apply for a conditional use and final development plan for the approval of a parking lot. Ms. Amorose Groomes reiterated that when the applicant applies for the conditional use the Commissioners would like to see a plan that is more permanent in nature. Mr. Hale Jr. requested that the permeable pavement requirement not be in the rezoning due to the significantly higher cost of that type of material and the uncertainty of the permanency of the lot. Mr. Walter questioned whether this issue should be in a rezoning and suggested it should be in a final development plan. Mr. Langworthy confirmed that this issue could be addressed in either the conditional use or the final development plan. Motion and Vote Mr. Zimmerman made the motion to recommend to City Council approval of this Rezoning/Prehminary Development Plan because 4 complies with the preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area with one condition: 1) That the applicant provide a stormwater management report for the site that complies with the City's stormwater management and stream protection Code, subject to approval by the City Engineer. Mr. Zimmerman asked Mr. Hale Jr. if he agreed to the one condition. Mr. Hale Jr., agreed. Mr. Walter seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Taylor, yes; Mr. Freiman, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Approved 6 — 0.) 3. r Hun Elementa chnul 8815 Avery R d U8- p45AFDP Amende final Developmen Ian Mr. Zimmerman a onced that Mr. S oltz pulled this c from the consent eL a items. Mr. Saneholtz d he did not requir e presentation by audia Husak, but uld e to see photographs the site. Todd Ammerman ::0 h;!to pplicant, Jim D is, Dublin City Sc ols, City represents es, all others who speak in regards this case. Mr. Saneholtz could stay one end o e Cirmed that if the present form for,pder. He noticed was incredibly temporary ission ve,dthis request, the u#fs (trailers ?) sting the site that a HVAC unit on He suggested th VAC be moved V 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION CITY OF DUBLIN_ L=Ww.aw JUNE 19, 2008 l«w 1 @ 5800 Shier -Rings Rood Dublin, Ohio 43016.1236 Phone /TDD: 614-4104600 Fax- 614-410 -4747 Web Site: www.dubin.oh.us Creating a Legacy The Planning and Zoning Commission took no action on the following case at this meeting: 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J - MAG 6325 Perimeter Loop Road 08- 052AFDP Amended Final Development Plan Proposal: Modifications to a car dealership, including the demolition of an existing building and the construction of a new building within Subarea J of the Perimeter Center Planned Commerce District, located on the east side of Perimeter Loop Road, at the intersectionwith Mercedes Drive. Request: Review of an amended final development plan under the Planned District provisions of Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Brentlinger Real Estate Co.; represented by Smith and Hale LLC. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us RESULT: This case was postponed prior to the meeting. There was no discussion or vote taken. STAFF CERTIFICATION Claudia D. Husak, AICP Planner II 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 19, 2008 — Minutes Page 4 of 9 3. Co an Park - Amphith ter - 048AFDP Tod immerman swore n Brian Ashford, r resenting the applic t, other City repres t� regards to this case. The Commi oners chose to fore a Planning case. 52 Emerald Parkway 14 Post Road Amended Fina evelopment Plan ilities Manager f the City of Dubl' ;s, and all oth who wished to spe in 3en n by Rachel Swish n this consent F ' e Freimann comm ed Planning fors ding Ztimel d informative me ng noti fication for this e, as he is a nearby ident. Mr. Zimm invited those pres who wished to come fo ard. [No one came fo d.] L Zimmerman made motion to approve Amended Final Dev oprnent Plan applic n. r. Freimann secon the motion. The v was as follows: Amorose Groomes, s; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; . Fishman, yes; Mr. ior, yes; Mr. Freim , yes; and Mr. Zi an, yes. (Approved 6 ) WZ O SESSION: r. Zimmerman ex ned the Work Ses ' n purpose and pro ores. He advised t all comments made the Commission informal and non - ing, and are intend only to provide general guidance to the appl' t regarding the app ' ation. 4. Perimeter Center, Subarea J - MAG 6325 Perimeter Loop Road 08- 052AFDP Amended Final Development Plan This case was postponed prior to the meeting. There was no discussion or vote taken. 5. yerimeter Center, S area D — MAG Par ' g Lot Venture Drive 03.112Z RezonmgtPreli ' ry Development F n audia Husak presen this request for an ' ormal review of a ding rezoning/prel' ary development plan r a stand -alone p ' g lot to serve the e ' ting Midwestern A Group (MAG) camp She explained that a application had b submitted in 2003 d then the applicant's evelopment prioriti 'fled and the case been placed on h until recently. She sai a site has frontage U.S. 33 and it is c ently undeveloped has no significant rta features. / Ms. Husak said Perimeter Center ed Commerce ' hict, stretches fro Avery- Muirfield Driv rnhe west past E ald Parkway on east. She said the plicant is proposing t amZr Subarea into the MAG cam and create a new sub a, Subarea J -1. She d the existing MAG ampus has two boil ' gs and an applicatio h been filed for an ex sign of the use on site which has pro forward on this pa g lot to provide oyee par��n g and all 09- 1082 /FDP storage. Ms. Hu said that the vehi a storage is ess whil( Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JUNE 16, 2005 XITY OF DUBLIN The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Amended Final Development Plan — 04- 145FDP — Perimeter Center PCD, Subarea D — Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) — 6355 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 14.83 acres located on the south side of Perimeter Drive, at the southeast intersection of Perimeter Loop Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center Plan, Subarea D). Request: Review and approval of an Amended Final Development Plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.053(G). Proposed Use: A 18,081- square -foot building expansion and skywalk addition to an existing auto sales facility. Applicant: Brentlinger Enterprises, D.B.A. Midwestern Auto Group, 6355 Perimeter Loop Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017, represented by Christopher Cline, Blaugrund, Herbert, and Martin Inc., 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500, Dublin, Ohio 43017. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410- 4644/Email: jadkins @dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To approve this Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed addition generally meets the text and PUD requirements, the applicant has worked with staff to address issues related to the addition and, the proposal will allow for the expansion of a successful business with the addition of high quality architecture and site design, with eight conditions: 1) That additional information be submitted regarding proposed lighting for the skywalk to ensure compliance with the Dublin Exterior Lighting Guidelines, subject to staff approval; 2) That the proposed Jaguar statue and MAG wall sign be eliminated from the plans and elevations; 3) That no colored lenses be used for any exterior lighting on site; 4) That all utility connections and/or extensions meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 5) That the applicant indicate text compliance for parking should staff determine there is a parking problem on site, subject to staff approval; 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo Page 1 of 2 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JUNE 16, 2005 6. Amended Final Development Plan — 04- 145FDP — Perimeter Center PCD, Subarea D — Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) — 6355 Perimeter Loop.Road (Continued) 6) That existing landscape plans be brought into compliance with the approved plan; 7) The site stormwater management is in compliance with the current Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and 8) That overhead doors utilize either partially opaque or dark tinted glass to further screen the interior service uses. * Christopher Cline, Blaugrund, Herbert, and Martin, Inc. agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5-0 RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Yamie Adkins, anner Use and Long Range Planning 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan Page 2 of 2 MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 10 Mr. Hale agre Ms. s inquired that if the t t wZsipsh ge tZ ould si a the same t ype. Ms. Boring stated at she thought ab loo beli the main anc store does have a Simtithge ig this Me agreed it was the sarpelhing across the street a KrogZCenter. B signs are �lar, and the other sma shops, the tenant sho , are externallMr. Gerber reite ed that staff is reco ending Option B, re it was conditioned. 7 Msins stated that he cou ord the motion to be ' support of staff's reco endation. Ms. Boring asked it be noted the signa package in the coed' ' ns utilizes the sign colors approved the Planning and Zo Commission; that we proved a two film lay burgundy. Mr. rber stated we will a at as the second con on. He asked Mr. f he was in Bement with both con ' runs. Mr. Hale agreed Mr. GBr moved to approve O ' n B of the Arnende al Development Plan b use the pro ed signage is consiste ith the architecture character of the area, t sign mply with the text an ode requirements, ai 1 maintain the high q ty standard of the development, wi o conditions: Z2at gnage package utili the sign colors approv y the Planning and mmission; and arketplace be interior lit and t urgundy co lor utiliz o of the yers. c Bd the motion, and otB was as follows: s, Reiss, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Ms. B ng, yes; Mr. Zimme , yes; Mr. Gerber, yes. { pproved 5 -0.) / 6. Amended Final Development Plan — 04- 145FDP — Perimeter Center PCD, Subarea D — Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) — 6355 Perimeter Loop Road Mr. Gerber swore in all those who intended to speak on this case. Ms. Adkins presented the case. The site is located north of 33/161 and east of Avery/Muirfield. The site is south of Perimeter Drive, consisting of 14 acres, zoned PCD, as part of the Perimeter Center plan, Subarea J, zoned for an auto dealership. Surrounding zonings are PCD, RI and PLR. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 11 Ms. Boring asked for a clarification on the requirement from the rezoning that the remaining 77 acres would not be auto dealerships, as a deed restriction. She stated that Council wanted to ensure that the remaining acreage wasn't all auto dealerships. Ms. Adkins responded that this site, Subarea J, was rezoned specifically for auto dealerships. She did not have a copy of the deed restrictions. Ms. Boring thanked Ms. Adkins, and wanted to clarify for the record, what land the requirement spoke to. Mr. Gerber agreed to clarify the requirement about the deed restriction. Christopher Cline, Attorney, responded that this requirement was in the original conditions. To his knowledge that landowner never put any additional deed restrictions on the land. MAG does own an additional 10 acres along State Route 161/U.S. 33. Ms. Boring asked if Mr. Cline knew what the acreage included. Mr. Cline answered no. The land was not originally zoned for auto dealerships. If we rezone more land, Council and the Commission will have to approve the change. Ms. Boring stated she did know there was considerable concern about Route 33 appearing like an automall. Mr. Cline explained that MAG owns an additional 10 acres east of the site. Eventually we may ask for this to be expanded with another pod, so it will be addressed at that time. Mr. Gerber stated that this was not an issue tonight. Mr. Cline clarified that there is not a deed restriction that prohibits it. Ms. Boring repeated that there are no deed restrictions, as was required by City Council. Ms. Adkins described the proposed site plan for the expansion. 1)The existing Land. Rover Building is just over 7,000 square feet and with the addition is 18,000 square feet. The rear of the building will enclose the service bays and the southwest portion of the building will have additional interior display, and the proposed sky bridge, the elevations which you have in your packet. There are minor modifications to the front along the main drive, and to the storage parking in the rear. The Land Rover sign will remain unchanged. The overhead service entrance will be enclosed with an overhead door. There is another central entrance proposed and a western entrance with a Jaguar sign. Materials and colors will be to match the existing building, including the dark tinted glass, and stucco. 2)The proposed sky walk will be elevated above the ground and extend out over the lake, beginning at the first floor elevation of the proposed addition, and finishing at the second 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes —June 16, 2005 Page 12 floor elevation of the existing buildng. The applicant is proposing similar materials to the addition, and dark tinted glass. 3)The existing Land Rover sign will be resurfaced with the addition. There is a proposed sign for the center entrance with MAG lettering over the doors. Staff has conditioned that this sign be removed. The third proposed sign is for the Jaguar entrance. Staff has also conditioned that the proposed statue be removed. Renderings of the proposed addition were shown. Staff is recommending approval of this application, with the conditions noted in the Staff Report. There are Amended Conditions. Condition 3 was amended to include the word "exterior" in terms of color, lenses, and the lighting, and Condition 6 was stricken. Mr. Gerber clarified Condition 6 was stricken because it is a Code issue. Ms. Adkins agreed and stated that it is a Code Enforcement issue. Mr. Gerber asked Steven Smith if this was correct. Mr. Smith confirmed this was correct. He indicated they had reviewed the project related to what was originally built. The current proposal may comply with Code. There is a landscape height issue, but it is a Code Enforcement issue that will be addressed. Mr. Gerber restated that the Commission does not have to concern itself with that particular landscape issue. Mr. Smith agreed. Ms. Boring asked why that was. Mr. Smith, replied that this site has interesting conditions placed on it by the Planning and Zoning Commission originally. It was clear that because of the unique design, the landscaping requirements of the Code would not apply. City Council, at the rezoning, dictated the landscape plan. The applicant has met all of the requirements. Ms. Boring disagreed with that assessment. Mr. Smith stated that the landscape plan was submitted to Council as part of the text and has the plants labeled. Ms. Boring replied that it says we would not see all the cars on those fingers, that we would only see the cars at the top of the fingers. Mr. Smith said when you listen to the minutes, I don't know that it's that clear. The plant material was specifically named and written in and that is the plant material that they have out there. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 13 Mr. Gerber clarified that new landscaping will be reviewed tonight. With respect to existing landscaping, that's a Code issue. This situation is no different from other applications. Maybe Dann [Bird] can report back to us at a subsequent meeting as to the progress. Mr. Smith added that the site is between 85% and 90% in compliance, and 10% of the plant material has been trimmed down. That is a Code Enforcement matter that we will address. Mr. Gerber agreed. Ms. Boring asked again, about the expansion rule in the Landscape Code. Mr. Smith said the Code does provide requirements if the expansion is more than 25 %, however, the site adheres to the text of the Planned District. Ms. Adkins responded that staff had discussed this matter and determined that if there is an expansion of 25% or more, the entire site must be brought into compliance with Code. However, this site had a specifically approved landscape plan at the rezoning that they have followed, and we wanted to bring them back into compliance with that plan, and that has become a Code Enforcement issue. Ms. Boring said the Commissioners had not reviewed the minutes and the history. She was interested in seeing the original landscaping plan presented to the Commission to compare it with what was planted. She said it was a problem if it did not meet Code. Mr. Smith responded that the landscaping will be brought into compliance. Mr. Gerber asked Mr. Smith why Condition 6 should not be a part of this application. Mr. Smith replied that Condition 6 requires a revised landscaping plan to be submitted. He said the landscaping is already in compliance with what Council specifically directed them to use. He suggested the condition state: That the existing landscaping material meet Code. Mr. Gerber agreed with Mr. Hale's suggested Condition 6. That existing landscape plans be brought into compliance with approved plan, subject to staff approval. Ms. Boring asked for clarification about the difference between the Landscaping section of the report and this condition. She wanted to ensure that the requirements of the Code were being met. Mr. Gerber said he believed the new condition discussed will address all that. Ms. Boring asked if that included the uplighting to comply with the intent of Code and to improve the appearance. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 14 Ms. Adkins responded yes. With the display lighting, the issue is that it is still visible. That would be part of the Code compliance staff would remedy at a later date, to make sure that the lighting is screened. Ms. Boring asked what the language should reflect. Mr. Gerber responded that the existing landscape plans should be brought into compliance. Mr. Smith stated that the existing landscape, at the direction of staff, be brought into compliance with the original text. Ms. Boring inquired about the plant height within the approved vehicular display area. Mr. Gerber wanted the language to be broad enough to cover all. Mr. Smith stated that the plants that Council directed them to plant, are never going to grow to the desired height. Ms. Boring added that it would help if they weren't trimmed. Mr. Smith noted that that is a Code Enforcement matter. It's only in certain areas that they are not tall enough. It does match what was directed as part of their text. Mr. Gerber repeated that if they let the plants grow it will be in compliance. Ms. Boring asked Mr. Smith what was the problem with leaving the condition in for plant height. Mr. Smith explained that the plants are not going to meet the 1 -1/2 -foot tall height required by Code. They are though, the plants approved by City Council as a part of the text. Ms. Jones noted that the report talks about replacing missing trees. She wanted to know where those trees are going to be replaced on the site. Mr. Bird said the existing landacape pretty broadly complies with the approved plan. Mr. Gerber suggested the lanuguage "The existing landscape, at staff s direction, be brought into compliance with the original text." We'll just make that Condition 6. Ms. Boring added that she was part of prior Council and knows what the idea was that was presented, and what we thought we were getting. Mr. Gerber asked Ms. Boring if the language that Dann Bird just read was acceptable. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 15 Mr. Bird restated, "That the existing landscaping be brought into compliance with the approved plan." Ms. Boring agreed. Mr. Christopher Cline asked if the Commission would like a complete presentation, or questions only. Mr. Gerber polled the Commission and they decided to ask questions in the areas of concern and interest and through that process the presentation will be made. Mr. Cline represented the applicant, with Dick Pryor and Tim Galley, from MAG; also, John Oney and Ed Parish from Architectural Alliance. Mr. Cline noted that when this campus was zoned in 1997, it was after changes took place in Perimeter Center. That was going to be an enclosed mall, and it turned into a different vision. The Council's direction was that the Commission considered the rezoning, developed the rezoning text and approved it. It also considered all parts of the development plan, including the landscaping plan, the architecture, and the grading. Only after the Planning and Zoning Commission had approved both the rezoning and the development plan did it go to Council for action on the rezoning. It went before Council twice and issues were added to the text. Council got involved in specifying particular cultivars of some of the plants, and having a landscape drawing that they incorporated into the revised text. The original text included a requirement that we would create "A striking, noteworthy and innovative architecture and site design." Mr. Oney, architect, asked the Commission if they had any questions. He could describe the total project, including the review of our reasons and the design, and the specifics of the plan. The booklets and a powerpoint presentation encompass some specific detail, along with overviews of the model, and renderings. Mr. Gerber indicated they would go to specific questions. He suggested that they start with the overall layout and design, and address those issues and questions. The other issues, like the signs, staff has addressed. I understand that the applicant has agreed to those changes. Ms. Reiss had a question regarding the bridge connection between the two sections of the campus and why it needed to be elevated at the existing building. Mr. Oney responded that the main building second floor elevation is at 12 feet, and the showroom pods that are existing are at 12 feet, which is the main corridor level. When we go to the Land Rover building, that showroom elevation is at grade. The only way to connect this from the main showroom level on the concourse, is at the 12 -foot level. It is the same height as the existing showrooms. Ms. Reiss asked if the reason for the sky bridge was to connect showroom to showroom. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 16 Mr. Oney agreed. The lower level in the main building is a Rolls -Royce showroom. The main emphasis and what MAG is trying to achieve is to sell you something you don't need. They're expensive products and in a very unusual setting, and to do that, they've created an environment that really is unmatched in the auto industry and pretty unique. The intent is, when you get to these showrooms and go through this concourse, you can embark and be encouraged through, this connectivity to go from that retail environment to all 15 marquis. Ms. Reiss confirmed that because the showrooms in the existing facility are on the second floor, the elevation of the bridge changes. Mr. Oney agreed. Ms. Reiss replied that was fine, and it explained why there's an elevation change, and what she needed to know. She had one other question for staff. The Staff Report states that the applicant is going to sufficiently screen the overhead service doors. However, staff would also like to see partially opaque, or dark tinted glass. She believed this should be conditioned. Ms. Adkins responded that it should be a condition. Ms. Reiss said she felt it should be a condition. The overhead doors in the service area either use partially opaque or dark tinted glass to further screen the interior surface uses. Mr. Oney stated they were in agreement with that and plan to use the dark tinted glass, which is existing in the Land Rover facility. We've reduced the service doors from nine to five, and used the dark tinted glass. We have some visual contact to a customer out in the reception doors. The service doors are screened to Code. There are currently seven doors that view directly into the heavy -duty lifts that service the heavy -duty vehicles, and we have eliminated those seven doors. Now we have two entrance points that go to an aisleway and tinted the glass. We've done additional screening as well. Ms. Reiss asked if that's what staff wanted to see done. Ms. Adkins agreed. Mr. Gerber stated that they needed a condition. Mr. Cline said that when the Land Rover building was done it was the second part of the project and the design was largely dictated by Land Rover. Land Rover has been acquired by Ford Motor Company, which also owns Astin -Martin and Jaguar, and they are integrating that building into the overall look of the complex. Mr. Zimmerman said he really liked the plan. It's unique in the marketing of a lot of different brands. It's a beautiful layout, and they've done a really nice job. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 17 Mr. Oney responded that they had 250 feet from building -to- building, plus a corridor behind the administrative wing to begin the swooping curving path with three visual cues. Mr. Zimmerman stated that each brand would have a space. He stated the internal/external setup is nice. Mr. Gerber asked about the landscaping. In this model there are a lot of trees. In time there would be a nice canopy all though there, so I know what Cathy's talking about because in part you do see an awful lot right now. That's in some respects unfortunate, but over time that's going to cure itself with these trees as they grow. I would image that's the whole intent of the landscaping package that's before us. Ms. Adkins stated that the landscaping for the site was installed in 1997 -98. Over time it will mature. Mr. Oney added they will be relocating pine trees and will be adding 52 evergreens as screening. We'll also be adding six shade trees, 10 evergreen trees and 10 replacement trees. Ms. Boring asked about the replacement of 23 inches of trees on the site. These trees screen the storage parking area and the applicant has added a row of evergreen shrubs to meet this requirement. This may be a problem of replacing trees with shrubs. Ms. Adkins responded that the Code requires 3 -1/3 feet in height of screening. The original Development Plan included the larger trees. When they are removed, to comply with Code, they added shrubs. Mr. Oney added that the replacement trees are located in the interior and are designated on the plan. Ms. Boring asked if the trees that they are planting in the parking area are required. Ms. Adkins replied those are required as replacement trees. Ms. Boring noted that the plan is removing parking places. She thought there are a lot of filled parking places. I assume the applicants and staff are comfortable with the removing of those parking places. Mr. Oney stated that approximately 98 parking spaces would be removed, but that parking would not be a problem. Mr. Gerber inquired about staff s solutions if a parking problem exists in the future. Ms. Adkins indicated that this situation would be a Code Enforcement issue and if staff noted a parking problem, the applicant would be requested to add parking in the future. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 18 Mr. Cline noted that the parking spaces are typically used for storage, not customers. Ms. Boring asked about the location of the evergreen shrubs screening the storage parking area. Ms. Adkins indicated that additional evergreens will be planted underneath the skywalk to screen the parking area. Ms. Boring asked about the changes to the pond. Mr. Oney indicated that the pond will stay intact, but that some of the caissons will extend into the pond requiring minor pond adjustments. Ms. Boring said the landscaping on site looks gorgeous and has matured well in the short time it has been there. Mr. Gerber reiterated that the applicant had agreed to removing the proposed Jaguar statue and MAG wall sign. He asked if there were other signage questions. Ms. Boring inquired if the Land Rover sign would be modified. Mr. Cline replied that this sign would undergo a refacing, but that the color, size and height would remain the same. He stated that if Land Rover was no longer the tenant of that structure, that green color would be removed from the sign. Mr. Oney also noted that the Land Rover sign would undergo a refacing. Mr. Gerber asked if the applicant agrees to the conditions including the elimination of the Jaguar statue. Mr. Oney agreed, saying that they will remove the MAG sign, and the "Leaper," the chrome ornament. Ms. Jones commented that the sky walk really unifies the campus, and it seems to be consistent with the look. She had no further questions. Mr. Gerber determined there were no other questions from the Commissioners. He stated that the text required this development to be "something noteworthy, striking and innovative," and the proposal meets those requirements. Ms. Boring asked for a recap of the actual approval. Ms. Adkins explained that the proposed MAG sign and the Jaguar statue sign will be removed, leaving only the JAGUAR copy on the building. So what will remain is the glass- 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 19 enclosed entrance. This is the middle entrance — no sign. The second part of our condition asks that the statue above the Jaguar sign be removed so that all there will be is the Jaguar lettering above the door. Ms. Boring inquired about the size of this sign. Ms. Adkins replied that the sign measures 22 square feet. Ms. Boring requested the removal of the phrase "subject to staff approval" from Condition 2. Mr. Gerber agreed. He asked if any of the Commissioners had additional questions. Hearing none, he asked if the applicant agreed with the eight condtions. Mr. Cline asked for a recap of the additional conditions. Mr. Gerber replied with respect to condition 2, it was modified to eliminate the phrase "subject to staff approval." Condition 6 was amended to read "That existing landscape plans be brought into compliance with approved plan;" and that Condition 7 remains the same. Ms. Reiss stated Condition 8 should read "Service doors need to be partially opaque or dark tinted glass to further screen interior service uses." Mr. Gerber thanked Ms. Reiss and asked Mr. Cline if the conditions were acceptable. Mr. Cline responded yes, we agree to them. Mr. Gerber made a motion To approve this Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed addition generally meets the text and PUD requirements, the applicant has worked with staff to address issues related to the addition and, the proposal will allow for the expansion of a successful business with the addition of high quality architecture and site design, with eight conditions: 1) That additional information be submitted regarding proposed lighting for the skywalk to ensure compliance with the Dublin Exterior Lighting Guidelines, subject to staff approval; 2) That the proposed Jaguar statue and MAG wall sign be eliminated from the plans and elevations; 3) That no colored lenses be used for any exterior lighting on site; 4) That all utility connections and/or extensions meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 5) That the applicant indicate text compliance for parking should staff determine there is a parking problem on site, subject to staff approval; 6) That existing landscape plans be brought into compliance with the approved plan; 7) The site stormwater management is in compliance with the current Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — June 16, 2005 Page 20 8) That overhead doors utilize either partially opaque or dark tinted glass to further screen the interior service uses. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 5 -0.) Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, U'ZQJ Lois Willard Clerical Specialist II Land Use and Long Range Planning 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. CITY OF DUBLIN_ Division of Planing 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/[DD: 614 -410.4600 Fax: 614A104747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 4, 2004 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Revised Development Plan 04- 029RDP — MAG Rolls Royce Auto Dealership — 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Location: 14.79 acres located on the southeast corner of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised development plan under the PCD provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: Exterior architectural and site modifications to an existing dealership for a Rolls Royce sales area. Applicant: Midwestern Auto Group, c/o Brentlinger Enterprises, 6355 Perimeter Loop Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by John Oney, Architectural Alliance, 165 North Fifth Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. MOTION: To approve this revised development plan because it conforms to the existing Subarea J text and complies with the PCD provisions of Section 153.058, providing for the expansion and update of a successful Dublin business with seven conditions: 1) That vehicular display be prohibited on the proposed path and be noted as such on all plans, subject to staff approval; 2) That no colored lenses be used for any lighting on site; 3) That the proposed modifications comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That revised plans be submitted if a second door is required, subject to staff approval; 5) That proposed new signage be submitted that is directional in nature, subject to staff approval; 6) That relocated trees be replaced on an inch - per -inch basis if they die within five years, subject to staff approval; and 09- 108Z /FDP Page 1 of 2 Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 4, 2004 3. Revised Development Plan 04- 029RDP — MAG Rolls Royce Auto Dealership — 6335 Perimeter Loop Road (Continued) 7) That the applicant utilize a rock that is more aesthetically suitable, subject to staff approval. * John Oney agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 -0. RESULT: This development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION w.. C' Frank A. Ciarochi Acting Planning Director Page 2 of 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 21 The vote as follows: Mr. essineo, ZsBor es Gerber, Zaportion immermar. refe of the tex would not taertai these resf, yes; Mr. Weholtz, yes; Ms. B g, yes; Ms. Reiss ;s"cussMing s. proved 6 -0.) noise, sm e, and odors. She ed if that Ms. Readl said the odor wvul ave to reach the le)Kq of a nuisance, whie'1'i is something that would offend a reasonable pe on. 3. Revised Development Plan 04- 029RDP — MAG Rolls Royce Auto Dealership — 6335 Perimeter Loop Road Mr. Gerber swore -in those who intended to speak before the Commission in regards to this administrative case. Jamie Adkins said this site is located in west - central Dublin, just north of SR 161 and east of Avery - Muirfield Drive. She showed slides of the site. The site has frontage on four public rights -of -way: Perimeter Loop, Venture Drive, Perimeter Drive, and SR,161. Perimeter Center is located to the west. The site is zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District in Subarea J of the Perimeter Center plan. All adjacent properties are zoned PCD. The area to be modified is at the main entrance of the site on Perimeter Loop Road. Proposed changes are minor and include a pedestrian pathway and modifications to the doors and windows on the north elevation. A small retaining wall will also be added to the existing pond, and a couple of trees will be relocated because of the pathway. The replacement door will be closed except when vehicles are driven inside the building. Ms. Adkins said the applicant would like to have the ability to switch out a second window with the same type of door if maneuvering problems arise. The north side of the building will be modified. Ms. Adkins said staff is recommending approval of this development plan with six conditions as listed in the staff report, adding a seventh condition: 1) That vehicular display be prohibited on the proposed path and be noted as such on all plans, subject to staff approval; 2) That no colored lenses be used for any lighting on site; 3) That the proposed modifications comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That revised plans be submitted if a second door is required, subject to staff approval; 5) That proposed new signage be submitted that is directional in nature, subject to staff approval; 6) That relocated trees be replaced on an inch - per -inch basis if they die within five years, subject to staff approval; and 7) That the applicant utilize a rock that is more aesthetically suitable, subject to staff approval. Mr. Gerber said this is a request to revise a previously approved development plan in the PCD. Because the type of uses and other general development are not proposed to change, the previously approved composite plan remains valid. The previously approved development plan 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 22 is being revised to address exterior architectural and site modifications to an existing car dealership sales area. The Commission is to base approval on conformity to the approved composite plan. Christopher T. Cline, Jr., representing the applicant, said he wanted the Commission to be aware of the contribution that MAG makes to Dublin's economy. Through City income taxes, personal property taxes, and real property taxes in 2003, MAG contributed approximately $741,000 to the community. They are a significant corporate citizen of Dublin. He said when this campus was built, it was the sponsor of a ten -year TIF that made area improvements such as Venture Drive. He said the original improvements were paid off in six years. The TIF is not being reused to provide improvements outside the initial area. Mr. Cline said this would be the only Rolls Royce dealership in Ohio. It is now owned by BMW, and the Phantom model retails for approximately $325,000. The clientele is very exclusive and expects to have a high quality environment when purchasing a car. The showroom must be exclusive for Rolls Royce. John Oney, Architectural Alliance, architect for this project, briefly described the modifications. He said there will be only one or two vehicles on site at any time. One will be in the showroom and the other in the shop area for test drives. Interior alterations will be made to make an exclusive showroom. Mr. Oney showed drawings of the proposed modifications. He said a pedestrian walkway in front would follow the natural slope of the pond. The grade change is approximately 30 inches. They will use stamped concrete in a scalloped fashion as was used at the BMW showroom. There are three ballasters to provide an accent feature. A conforming directional sign will identify the Rolls Royce showroom entrance. He said the Phantom model is 19%2 feet long. They have also provided vehicle access to the showroom from the rear inventory lot using enough room to maneuver the large vehicle. Two existing pines and two deciduous trees will be relocated in front. The only proposed modification to the exterior elevation is to change the eight -foot door to a ten -foot opening to allow the large vehicle to be placed in the showroom. The glazing and mullions will match the glass. They propose to introduce horizontal mullions to match. Mr. Oney said it might be necessary to_ come back to the Commission if modifications need to be made to provide access for a second vehicle. He agreed with the seven conditions listed above. Ms. Boring said a Code revision was necessary to avoid having to go through this process for such a minor modification. Mr. Gerber asked why the Commission had to hear this application instead of it being handled administratively. Ms. Adkins said the reason staff thought it should be brought to the Commission is because the modification will be made at the main entrance of the site where it will be visible from the public right -of -way, and it is a PCD. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — March 4, 2004 Page 23 Mr. Gerber agreed, but said only because of the visibility the Commission should review it. Gary Gunderman clarified that if changes to the Code had been adopted to consolidate the PCD with the PUD, this would not be before the Commission. Mr. Gerber understood. Mr. Saneholtz made a motion to approve this revised development plan because it conforms to the existing Subarea J text and complies with the PCD provisions of Section 153.058, providing for the expansion and update of a successful Dublin business with seven conditions: 1) That vehicular display be prohibited on the proposed path and be noted as such on all plans, subject to staff approval; 2) That no colored lenses be used for any lighting on site; 3) That the proposed modifications comply with applicable Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That revised plans be submitted if a second door is required, subject to staff approval; 5) That proposed new signage be submitted that is directional in nature, subject to staff approval; 6) That relocated trees be replaced on an inch - per -inch basis if they die within five years, subject to staff approval; and 7) That the applicant utilize a rock that is more aesthetically suitable, subject to staff approval. Mr. Gerber seconded the motion. Mr. Cline agreed to the conditions as listed above. The vote was as follows: Mr. Messineo, yes; Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 6 -0.) 4. Rezonin evised Prelimina evelopment Plan -045X UD Retail, Suba as 5A and 5B — I�ro Center — Sawmill ad Mr. rber noted this was very large applicat' . He said eeting was s tiled for March 1 S tit there are no app ' ations currently Instead canceling the meetin t made sense to hear s case then. Ben W. Hale r., representing the plicant, agreed to re est a tabling in ord to hear this applicatio m its entirety at the xt meeting. He sai ey were ready to onight and that they ld not change anyt ' in the next two wee Gerber made a ion to table tZcas e a motion. M . eiss seconded the ion, and the vote was follows: Mr. M. Saneholt es; Mr. Zimmerm es; Ms. Reiss, yes; an r. Gerber, yes. [M the ro temporarily.) (Tab 5 -0) a. Informal 03 -139 Avondale Woods o ublin — 5215 Avery cad Mr. Gerber said xs is an informal re 'ew of development Wions in order to a ess the objectives of a recently enacted nservation Design olution. The disc on will be limited to rtv minutes. M, # Zuppo said the app ' ant has filed for a PLR, Planned Lo Density Residentia di application to rent" r strict, but wante(Yt 09_108Z/FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. CITY OF DUBLIN Division of Planniagg 5800 Shier -Rings Ron d Dublin, Ohio 43016.1136 %neAft- 614 - 161 -6550 Fox 614 - 161.6566 Web Site: wwwAublin oh us DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION January 15, 1998 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Development Plan 97 -153DP - Perimeter Center, Subarea J - Land Rover Center - 6029 Perimeter Drive Location: 1.87 acres located at the extreme north end of an overall 14.78 acre site located on the south side of Perimeter Drive between Perimeter Loop Road and Venture Drive, also abutting US33 /SR 161. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center Plan). Request: Review and approval of a development plan for a new automobile dealership building under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: A new 7,335 square foot retail building to be added to an approved plan for a 71,000 square foot dealership (site under development). Applicant: Midwestern Auto Group, c/o Mark Brentlinger, 5016 Post Road; Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Christopher T. Cline, attorney, 37 West Broad Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION. To approve this development plan because the use is compatible with the surrounding area and meets the intent of the Perimeter Center text with three conditions: 1) That the building match the original MAG building in terms of colors and materials; 2) That if Land Rover is no longer the tenant of the building, that the green architectural element on the front elevation and the wall sign be removed; and 3) That the overall site landscape plan be revised to show all changes caused by the development of Land Rover. *Chris Cline, representing the applicant, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Suzannj E. Wmge+-' -, .' Planner 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. crn' OF DUBLIN MEETING MINUTES DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COAEMSSION JANUARY 15, 1998 Division of Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Duhh, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/IDD: 614- 761.6550 Fax: 614 -761 -6566 Web Sile: www.dublin.oh.us 1. Developm t Plan 97-153 - Perimeter ter, Subarea J K nd Perimeter D 've (Approved -0) ezoning Apph ti Z96 -014 - limiury De lopment Plan - A f - very Road an Rings Road bled 7-0) Rez ' e Avolicati 97 -14OZ - So er Stadium - 85 Post Road Rover ter - 6029 ry Village Co ons (E proved 6-1) 2. 3. e meeting w called to order 6:30 p.m. by aralee Chinnici- uercher. Other mirlission me bens present re Tom McCas JiTweprreagBu rge Peplow, i Lecklider, John errara Harian. Sta members Ares obbie large, Mary comb, Chris He ann, Suzann Wingenfield, m Littleton, hn Talentino, sa Fierce, Fr Hahn, Bridget le, Mitch Ban efsky, Chad ibson, Balbir ndra, Randy B man, Rick H ig, Mary Beard $Qd Libby ley. Ms. Niinnici - Zu her welcomd4Tom McCash 4 the new City (S�uncil liaison. J r. Ferr made a m Lion to accept to documents o the record, Mr. Harian s onded. vote was follows: Sprague, ; Mr. Lecklide yes; Mr. Mc h, yes; Mr. P low, yes; s. Chin i•- Zuerche yes; Mr. HA an, , yes; and M Ferrara, yes. prroved 7 -0.) 1. Development Plan 97 -153DP - Perimeter Center, Subarea J - Land Rover Center - 6029 Perimeter Drive Suzanne Wingenfield presented this development plan for a new automobile dealership building on a 15 acre site located on the south side of Perimeter Drive. The rezoning that created Subarea J was approved in 1997. The large automobile dealership building (50,000 square feet) was approved in May 1997 and is now under construction. This proposal is for a 7,000 square foot automobile dealership at the northern two acres of the same site. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 15, 1998 Page 2 Ms. Wingenfield said this building must comply with the development text standards in terms of parking, layout, landscaping, and signs. Wall signs are generally not permitted in Perimeter Center, but the development text does permit a wall sign on this building. The 20 foot high sign faces Perimeter Drive. It is mounted on a green architectural panel that is 31 feet tall. The Land Rover building is a one story structure primarily constructed of concrete masonry units, glass, and stucco. The colors will be shades of gray with some white. The rezoning requires that this building have architecture and materials that are compatible with the larger MAG building. This proposal meets this requirement. The front of the building will face Perimeter Drive. The showroom is to be constructed with tinted gray glass. Ms. Wingenfield said staff recommends approval of this development plan with three conditions: 1) That the building match the original MAG building in terms of colors and materials; 2) That if Land Rover is no longer the tenant of the building, that the green architectural element on the front elevation'and the wall sign be removed; and 3) That the overall site landscape plan be revised to show all changes caused by the development of Land Rover. Mr. Lecklider asked if the sign proposed is a wall sign. Ms. Wingenfield said yes. The green architectural structure is connected to the building, and the sign is mounted on it. Mr. McCash asked what the 11 parking spaces which were removed, were for originally. Ms. Wmgenfield said they were primarily customer and service parking spaces. The display parking remains the same. Spaces in the rear of the building for holding cars were also removed. Mr. McCash asked about Condition 2 and how the green element could be removed without destroying the building. Ms. Wingenfield believed the structure resembled a chimney but did not provide structural support. Ms. Clarke said the green vertical element was used as an identifier for this specific dealership everywhere. If the building is occupied by any other dealership, the new dealer will probably want to remove it. Ms. Clarke said that Land Rover uses a lodge - looking building nationally which did not integrate well with the very modern and sleek architecture of the MAG building. Currently, Land Rover has agreed to build a smaller version of the MAG building, which is warmly welcomed. At the time of rezoning, it was stated that this vertical sign space was a necessary element of the deal and it is cited in the PCD text. Mr. Peplow said a wall sign, not exceeding 32 square feet not including the word "Dublin" was approved at the time of rezoning. He asked what size the Land Rover sign was exclusive of the word "Dublin ". Ms. Wingenfield said it was approximately 31 square feet. Ms. Wingenfield said the sign is consistent with the text. Mr. Sprague said when MAG applied for rezoning, they expected problems with Land Rover unless the wall sign was permitted. The Commission understood and included a wall sign. He views the entire green panel as the sign, and was concerned that it exceeds the Code. Ms. Wingenfield said the green architectural element is part of the exterior wall. The oval and lettering constitute the sign. Mr. Sprague disagreed. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 15, 1998 Page 3 Mr. Sprague asked about the vehicle demonstration track. Ms. Wingenfield said it was for test drives and had landscaping, etc. Christopher Cline, attorney, agreed with the above three conditions on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Cline said the green vertical design element was specifically mentioned in the text and will be designed to be removed without changing the building. He said Dublin has been easier to work with than Land Rover in this process. He showed Land Rover's original and final building designs. The building will not be intrusive. He showed the Commission the building materials which will match the MAG building except for the green We element. The gray metal shown is the material of the standing seam roof The three masonry materials will be identical to those at MAG. Mr. McCash said the Land Rover green color (GM -1) of the vertical design element was not mentioned in the text. He was comfortable with the color shown. Mr. McCash asked about the white spruce trees screening the vehicle display area. Mark Brentlinger said it is a short- needled tree that has a greater density, such as the Austrian pine. Mr. Cline said during the rezoning process at City Council on June 2, various Council members were concerned that the sign was largely undefined. As a result, there was a text modification as a response to Council. It also prohibited wall signs on SR 33. Mr. Lecklider agreed with Mr. Sprague's interpretation that the entire structure constituted a sign. Mr. Sprague asked if the display rock stand was standard for Land Rover dealerships. Mr. Cline said yes. It is behind the fingers and display cars and will not make an impact from the street. Mr. Sprague asked about the vehicle demonstration track. Mr. Brentlinger said it was constructed of large pieces of flagstone placed in a way that only a Land Rover can drive over it. It would damage any other type of vehicle. Mr. Cline said it was not a race track; the average speed would be less than 5 MPH. Mr. Brentlinger said the track was not visible from the street. Mr. Ferrara asked why the sign area was increased nine square feet. Mr. Brentlinger said it increased when "Dublin" was added. Mr. Ferrara said the text clearly stated that the sign shall not exceed 32 square feet, not including "Dublin ". Mr. Ferrara said there was no documentation on the height of the pylon. Mr. Cline said these were contained in the January 9 text additions. Mr. Sprague said the building was very attractive and consistent in design and material with the main building. He would like to see the rock display removed. Mr. Peplow liked the green Land Rover sign. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - January 15, 1998 Page 4 Mr. McCash said Council had been concerned about the 15 foot height of the sign, but was satisfied with the text at this time. Mr. Lecklider said since the wall sign appeared within a text revision approved by City Council, he was no longer concerned. Mr. Ferrara made a motion to approve this development plan because the use is compatible with the surrounding area and meets the intent of the Perimeter Center text with three conditions: 1) That the building match the original MAG building in terms of colors and materials; 2) That if Land Rover is no longer the tenant of the building, that the green architectural element on the front elevation and the wall sign be removed; and 3) That the overall site landscape plan be revised to show all changes caused by the development of Land Rover. Mr. McCash seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher thanked and congratulated Mr. Brentlinger on this expansion. 2. R Applil Z96 -014 - Develo ent Plan - Ave Wage Commons very Load Rings Road hn Talentina esented this g which was ed without discus ' n on December 4, 7. The develo ent includes lots and 243 ti -family units. "unloaded" road ithout drivewa uts will be bui y the develope ough the site. development is to a north of it, there is a par the south. Ac ss is from the ne street with a second access from rporate Cente rive. He sho the Samson perty immediately the north. Mr. Talentino said a pool and par are both within 200 -foot setback. nd with a faun n provide a interest. He d the architectur drawings were con ual. Fo industrial lots been added to d Ian at the end of Co rate Center Driv e Office use preferred in Community Pl for these. The rest the site is sho in the Plan as residential use r 1 -2 du/ac. S ias been working wi is applicant for a , j6ng time. The , except for nsity, complies ' h the Southwest Ar Ian. Staff likes amenities such s the large k and new road is plan defines a nt where the sin - family area be ' s. The ap cant has respon to many of the City' equests. Mr. Talentino aid issues of density, ad /pedestrian con tions between s site and off si , and provi n of parkland have been resolved. t sizes should ' crease as they ove westw d. Architectural draw' gs have not been mitted. The a icant wants f ack on de ty. He said staff recd wends disapproval this rezoning ed upon 11 r ns: The project densi five dwelling unit r acre) exceed ie recommend density in the Community Pl , and the propos an's characters cs fail to justif density increase. 2) The plan f ' s to incorporate Avery Road r' t -of- -way cons' ent with the adopted Thorou are Plan. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Ciq-Coun pane 10 Meeting — i: Held June 9, 1997 19 1j j hi/"cultural not grown in the so M ented that althou Council has approved � di unable to fill any seasonal positions di � i Th crew is now about 60 percent of auth It sus of Co cil to eliminate the irriga 'an ! a stamped concrete. li Mr. Helwig asked tha Council consider adding 1 $17,500 as outlined ' the memo. It was the consens of Council to put trees o the same quantit , as suggested by Mr. Rei r. ing tncreases for s the Libor mark conditions. I staffing. system and to ySe pavers instead es on both sides the bridge at a cost north side an o use 71 8 foot tr s in •i Mr. Helwig ted that the total costs of a items selected b Council, including 10,500 � for the tree n the north side of the b ' ge is $595,752 . a budget was esti ted at I$565,000, �Mr. Casli suggested that spray atings be used o the walls to protect gem from the �j salt. Mr Smith suggested that the d' ance specify th the total cost not a $600,000. ijS f can then follow the dir lion given by Cou cil tonight in regard o the alternates. �I Vote on the ordinance - . McCash, yes; . Reiner, yes; Mrs. oring, yes; Mayo/ Kranstuber, yes; Mr. mpbell, yes; Ms. lde Pittaluga, yes. rdivance 8 97 - n Ordinance D ring Improvemnn o Certain Parcels f Real •operty to be a hlie /ol cribing the Public t 'restructure lmpr ements be made to B efit Th Requiring the O Cs Thereof to M e Service iymeats in I ' u of Tax Ant rixing a City Ag ent with Ruscilli onstnlctsan �., Inc. Pr it Sharing Trust and Olde ste Properties, Co mhos gilding, C. and BrEnterprises wit Respect to Those yments, tablish' g a Municip aprovement T Increment Equiv ent. Fund for the yposit f SucService , Autllorizin a Related Amen nt of an ;ree ent with the Dub chool Dist ct, and Declaring a Emergency. r, sley noted that is is the tax increm t financing agree me for the Midwester i Group and Gard Flesch developme s. Kranstuber mov to treat this as cm gency legislation. r. Campbell seco ded the motion. s. Grigsby stat that the need for a ergency is to comply vith the time frame or the blic improve. nts to be made to a ommodate. these de v opments. - Mr. McCash, bstain; Mr. Reiner, es; Mrs. Boring, ye Mayor anstuber, s; Mr. Campbcll, ; Ms. Hide Pittalu ,yes. - Mr. Re° er, yes; Mayor K uber, yes; Ms. Hid ittaluga, yes; r. Cam ell, yes; Mrs. Bo ' g, yes; Mr. McCash abstain. Tabled Ordinances Scheduled for Action l � Ordinance 41 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.78 Acres of {j Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Midwestern Anto Group) (Applicant: Chris Cline, 37 W. Bridge Street representing ;'Charles Aeh, Midwestern Auto Group, 5016 Post Road, Dublin, OH 43017) Ms. Clarke noted that a two -page addendum to the text was distributed this evening. She noted that the text was amended based on the discussion at the public hearing regarding signage. She believes that the text represents the direction given by Council, and staff recommends approval of the ordinance with the amended text. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Bublin City Con PAR eetin Held June 9, 1997 19 F Mr. Reiner asked about the landscape changes on the display "fingers ". Mr. Cline stated that the short finger is virtually all display area. ii Ms. Clarke noted that in regard to the landscaping plan, she cannot verify staffs ;i acceptance. II Mr. Cline stated that Ms. Newcomb had verified that the landscaping changes were acceptable. i i ' Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the ordinance with the conditions of Planning and it Zoning, the text and the addendum submitted to Council tonight. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. i Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. I Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. rdinance 63 -97 - ordinance Providing Change in Zoning for 5 Acres I.acated at the " us of 1]avid Road, roxi tely 720 Feet l+lo of Slt 161 root; b 4 urban Residential D' t to: PCD, Planned Co erce District, and Decl Emergency. {A1:P posed David Road Sub ion} {Applicant: Roy S American Electrie wer, 2151Horth Front S t, Columbus, OH } s. ated that th phcant and staff are now sficd with the text su tted to Couning mission believes that at s e point in the future, mmunicatiow 'towesi tay be desirable. The Ci ncourages locating th owers on existing strucrever possible, so this ssible use was added t is text. It also includes that wer would be subject the approval of the Bo of Zoning Appeals or a thority at the ti Ms. Hide Pittaluga ed that she is concernS44ith including aprovision,44ut a communication wer when the en mmunications issues forKc City have not been resolved. s is premature. s!Hansley responded th is text change merely is this as a permissive use, and it ems logical to inclu . it at this time. stated that he specifically asked othc eeting if there would be mmunications tower there and someone h sured at there would not. s. Clarke confirmed t the response to this question did not come m City staff. iMr. Campbe�Ilwd at he does not recall any discussion iou sly about a tower at this ;location. ,NTF. McCash proposed that it would make re sense to allow one communications to teal substation here and a cellular tower artin at this location rather than have an 51p, Road which was one of the oth tes under consideration. He would pre" change the language to "cellular towe " om "towers" and stipulate that it would to be attached to :the existing structure the site. Ms. HW5,Vitfaluga stated that she would have prcfe to have the input of the Service I ire r on this matter. She believes it is ina priate to add this provision; she would ier see that p>thepending a separate oning matter. Ms. Hide Pittalelet a language that refers specifically to the tower The motion died and. Ms. Hide Pittal McDaniel fallow up with a report ou ng how this ordinance will ong telecommunications ordinance. Folio g discussion, Mr . Campbell moved to add a ge 6, "further, a communications xerv�er which equals or exceeds 36 feet in heigh s related facilities will be permitted to be mounted on the existing electrical substatiotr structures if approved ..." 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 2 Meeting . Ir Hel June 2, 1997 3�qjg on the motidn - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. . Stillwell, yes; Boring, yes; MVbriKranstuber, y s; Ms. Hide tttaluga, yes; Mr. Cam ell, yes; Mr. McC , yes. r dinance No. 41 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.78 Acres f Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (MidwWcrn Auto Group) (Applicant: Chris Cline, 37 W. Bridge Street representing Charles Ae.h, Midwestern Auto Group, 5016 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017) Registered as a proponent of the rezoning was Chris Cline. There were no registered opponents to the rezoning. Ms. Clarke stated that Midwestern Auto Group is looking to triple the size of their existing facilities on Post Road and relocate to the Perimeter area between Perimeter Drive and Perimeter loop. The site consists of nearly 15 acres and the building proposed is very unusual and tailored to this user. The site as presently zoned under the Perimeter Center plan permits construction of office and t7Lli uses, hotels and multi -story buildings. The proposed plan creates a new subarea within the Perimeter Center text plan - Subarea "1". The proposed user is an auto dealer and the building plan is exotic, with a specialized landscape plan, and unusual signage. The building features three glass showrooms that face the southwest of the site. The parking has been divided into several areas. The rezoning was approved by Planning Commission on April 10, 1997 with 6 conditions: 1) That the text be revised to provide clarification as to visual sale gimmicks, landscaping, lighting, auto display, grading, and building architecture; 2) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited; 3) That a more acceptable sign package be submitted as part of this rezoning and incorporated in the text; 4) That design for all storm water management, site utilities and improvements including grading meet the approval of the City Engineer; 5) That construction be linked to approval of the preliminary plat for "Wall" Street; and 6) That an appropriate subarea plan be submitted. Ms. Clarke commented that the grading, lighting and architecture for this plan are very unusual and it does not conform to Code in a variety of ways. However, staff and Planning Commission have supported the application because of the creative approach to this site which will house an auto dealer. 1n terms of the signage, Ms. Clarke explained that because the site has frontage on four streets - US 33, Perimeter Loop, Perimeter Drive and Venture Drive, they are permitted to have four signs. What has been proposed are two signs 18 feet in height and 50 square feet each, a not yet identified wall sign, and an identification sign at the entrance on Venture Drive. Dublin's Code does not permit signage over 15 feet and does not permit a combination of wall signs and ground signs. i In response to Mr. Reiner, Ms. Clarke stated that there are other areas where this application � R does not meet Dublin's Code: a 6 -foot high screen is required along the perimeter of property I along freeway frontage and limited access freeways. This site does not have 6 -foot high I; screening. She noted, however, that the Code specifically permits an auto dealership to have a �i certain percentage of the frontage to be used as a display area, and this site does not exceed that percentage. They have chosen to do the display in an atypical fashion. The lighting on the site is not addressed by the Dublin lighting guidelines which call for consistency across the entire site. The application as proposed is for accent lighting on display cars and up- lighting on features of display cars. Ms. Hide Pittaluga noted that the plan is very tasteful, but wondered about the effect the variances allowed in terms of signage, grading and lighting would have on future rezoning requests. Ms. Clarke noted that a variance from the 6 foot screening requirement in front of buildings along 33 and I -270 has been granted to several applicants previously, including AirTouch, the Thomas Kohler rezoning, Cardinal Health and the Tuttle 11 building. The type of lighting 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 3 Meeting June 2, 1997 9 requested in this case is very unusual and unique and not likely to be requested by another user. The Planning Commission looked favorably on this application due to the comprehensive design which incorporated these individual elements. Mr. Campbell pointed out a Planned Commerce District has its own zoning, therefore, technically, these would not be called "variances ". Ms. Clarke agreed that these elements are at variance to the present Code, not variances in themselves. There is no hardship situation involved. Mr. Campbell also noted that there had been a commitment that this would be the last car dealership on the site, and asked if the landowner has agreed to deed restrict the rest of the property. Ms. Clarke stated that the land owner has agreed to this deed restriction, adding that he still controls 77 acres. Ms. Hide Pittaluga pointed out that the Marriott rezoning had some similar circumstances to this rezoning in that they are both PCD's and have distinguishing characteristics which justify unique treatment. Mayor Kranstuber asked for further clarification on the size of the signs. How do the Dublin standards compare to those in Perimeter? Ms. Clarke stated that neither the Dublin Code nor the Perimeter text addresses a site with four frontages such as this one. The Perimeter Mall and the outparcels have been tightly controlled in terms of signage. There are no restrictions on colors. Mayor Kranstuber asked about the justification for eliminating the mounding. Ms. Clarke explained that under the Dublin Code, auto dealers are permitted 25 percent of their frontage to be used as display. They could choose to do no mounding along US 33 and it would still meet Code. This is the only auto dealer of the three on the site which will have frontage along US 33. Mr. McCash asked what the intended ancillary commercial uses would be as referred to in the next dated May 16, 1997. Ms. Clarke responded that these could be a newsstand, a sandwich shop, etc. which could be ancillary uses within a structure primarily devoted to office use. Mr. McCash expressed some concern about a reference to special cultural events to take place on the site with no mention of obtaining permits for such events. Mr. McCash also noted concern about the outside speakers and music system and the possibility of sound emitting onto the adjacent properties. The sound system could be used to attract customers much the same as signage would do. Mr. McCash asked if the sign on the Land Rover building will be limited to the 15 foot height provision. He could envision a 65 foot tall portion of the Land Rover building with a sign on it given the text language. Ms. Clarke responded that has not been specified. The Planning Commission indicated they would review this as a design element when the building plans are submitted. Mr. McCash also noted that the signage as proposed would exceed the three -color Code restriction. Mayor Kranstuber commented that he believes they should be restricted to a three- color maximum on the signage per Dublin code. Mr. Reiner asked if willow trees are still banned as acceptable trees due to the drainage problems with the species. Ms. Clarke responded that they are not on the approved tree list. Chris Cline. 37 W. BridSt Street stated that he represents the applicant. He displayed a model of the site and proposed development. He stated that the site has 2,800 feet of frontage on four public roads which constitutes a unique situation for signage. He explained that the height of the signage was the major concern at Planning Commission. The signs as proposed are of 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin City Counpil __)'ag€ 4 Meeting June 2, 1997 brushed aluminum or stainless steel, and the logos will be cut out and back lit. He added that a logo is needed for each of the 12 dealers on the sign and for this reason the applicant could not compromise on the 15 feet requested. He noted that the major area where this signage proposal differs from Code is the logo wording on the sign. The sign with the logos, however, is artistic and aesthetically pleasing. The Land Rover sign on that building is needed and is not an area where they want to negotiate. They will still have to have the approval of Planning Commission for that, and he assured Council that the sign will be compatible with the size of the building. The other sign at the service entrance is a directional sign and will contain no logos. Mr. McCash noted that the text indicates that the applicant plans to reuse the present BMW pylon sign which is an internally illuminated sign. Mr. Cline responded that it will be used as an internal sign and not visible from the street. Mr. Cline commented that the concept for the grading plan involves an innovative and aesthetic approach to concealing a car dealership. The proposed design sloping will conceal the stock of cars which are downhill from the tips of the "fingers" used for display cars. The comprehensive plan for the site integrates grading, architecture, quality design and sets a precedent. The Planned District use encourages imaginative design and the creation of unique development standards. They believe they have done so with this application. In terms of special events, the anticipation would be for a special event such as a symphony concert for the community where the cars would be removed from the showroom for the event. There will be gallery space in the dealership where art exhibits could be displayed. The music will be a low level classical type. The low level ground lighting and the music will be subject to staff review. Mr. Reiner pointed out that if the intent of the landscaping is for screening purposes, the proposed plan calls for only one third as many spruce trees as are needed to accomplish the objective. Mr. Cline responded that they are committed to screening and will work with staff to make this acceptable. Mr. Reiner suggested that the willow trees be removed since they will disrupt the pond. Mr. Cline responded that the applicant understands the drawbacks of the willow trees but plans to include them. He will work with the City's landscape architect on this issue. Discussion continued about the mounding and screening of the finger areas. Mr. McCash noted that he has concerns about the lighting left on in the showrooms after hours. Charles Aeh_ Midwestern Auto Group stated that they anticipate leaving some lights on in the evenings as is currently done, but they will be at a much lower level. It will be tasteful, subtle and elegant. Mayor Kranstuber suggested that the applicant put into writing that the after hours lighting will be subtle and of accent type only. Mrs. Boring commented that under the Revised Charter, Council has the option of suspending the vote after a public hearing until the next Council meeting. In view of the many issues being raised, this may be appropriate. Discussion continued about the signage for the Land Rover building. Mr. McCash indicated that he would like to add language to the text stating that no wall signs would be permitted along US 33, Mr. Cline responded that this would not be a problem. Mrs. Stillwell commented that this is an important piece of land in terms of its location at a gateway area. The discussion engendered by a creative and innovative application has been good. She does not believe the issues raised tonight are insurmountable. She would like to 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 5 Meeting June 2. 1997 identify the remaining issues and move forward Mrs. Boring stated that this application is unique in its design and deals with display in a different manner than other car dealerships. It does not set a precedent to allow car dealerships to park cars on top of mounds for display. It is instead a comprehensive design, innovative and creative. Mayor Kranstuber summarized that the issues identified tonight are: the number of spruce trees needed to scree; the text language regarding sign colors; internal illumination in the showrooms; and noise level of music on the site. Mr. Campbell suggested that the vote be postponed until the next meeting to allow for redrafting of the text to address concerns identified tonight. He moved to suspend the public hearing and to have the ordinance voted on at the June 9 Council meeting. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Mr. Cline asked for clarification on the interior trees since the present proposal meets code. Mr. Reiner stated that if the intent is to screen the inventory, they need to add one third more trees. There are also errors in the specifications for the taxus shrubs. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes, Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes. The ordinance will be voted on at the June 9 Council meeting. Ordinance 0. 63 -97 - An Or ranee Providing fora nge in Zoning for Acres Located the Terminus rrf avid Road, Approxim y 720 Feet North of 161, )from: Suburban R deutinl District to: PC , Ianned Commerce istrict (AEP - Pro std David Road ubstat'st:n} (Applicant: oy Strawser, Ameri Iectric Power, 2 North Front St et, Columbus, Oh agistered as provents of the rezoning ward Maher, 349 elen Place, Grove Cit er, 517 Northfield D riv le, OH; Daniel OH; Roy Stra ambory, 5672 Cloverva , Johnsto�pponents ; John E. Brady, 41 S. gh Street; Roger Vo 6668 David Road, Du n, OH; Mihurella, 6656 David ad, Dublin OH.. Regist of the r oning were: Ethel Sc 11, 6629 David Road, fm; Virgil Sc II. Westerville. s. Clarke stated this is rezoning for eight to m the David Road subd' sion - the back eight lots, four ofwh' are on the east side the road and four on th est. The eight lots plus the right of w for David Road equ 4.25 acres. The site is rrently zoned R-4 and it is developed wi single family homes approximately one -h at ere lots. The proposal i or a Planned C merce District for a ectrical substation and blic street. She noted at the text is tll in negotiation bet en staff and AEP, and quested that Council del their vote u June 9. This appli eon was reviewed by th anning Commission on y 1, 1997, and oy recommended ap oval by a vote of 5 -0 vii four conditions: 1 That an appropr` a development text be mitred which outlines th aximum future development rameters and specific d ails of the buffering; n 2) That then tied David Road right- way be vacated by City ncil; 3) That a ss be provided to the n h exclusively; and 4) Tha a height of the facilitie a kept to the absolute mi "mum. Ms. Clar showed slides of the ar to Council. Staff has w ed with the applicant to provi as little disruption as p sible for the remaining nei borhood. David Road was t as rivate _tree[, and it is fear how much heavy co ruction traffic it can handle. e st section that will be c structed will be the north d of the site. Two additio is have been set aside for the y to purchase for an we an of Village Parkway. The ' will be surrounded by a 5- of mound and by evergree trees. Village Parkway can b ended to the west through a northern two lots to jo' up with a proposed road calle `Shamrock 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 CITY OF DUBLIN 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, 01143016-7295 Phone/1DD: 614/761 -6550 Fax: 614/761.6506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Development Plan 97 -034DP - Perimeter Center Subarea =J - Midwestera Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive Location: 14.78 acres located at the southeast corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive. E sting Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center plan, rezoning for Subarea J pending). Request: Review and approval of the development plan for a 70,866 square foot auto dealership under the provisions of Section 153.058. Proposed Use: Proposed auto dealership. Applicant: Charles Aeh, c/o Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this development plan because it will preserve the desired character along US 33 /SR 161 and within the area, conforms to the PCD regulations, is consistent with the Community Plan, and employs very innovative site design and architecture, with nine conditions: 1) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited and that access along Perimeter Loop Road be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) That the construction of the site be coordinated the construction - of public roadways and utilities, subject to approval of the City Engineer; 3) That the design of all storm water management systems, site utilities and improvements, including grading, be subject to the approval of the City Engineer; 4) That the landscape plan be revised to conform more closely to the requirements of the Code and the comments in this report, subject to staff approval; 5) That text be amended to further address landscaping, signage, lighting, grading and building architecture; 6) That signage be permitted as follows: two, 15 -foot pylon signs as presented at this meeting; one, four -foot high direction sign; a ground sign facing US 33, subject to staff approval (not to be a 15 -foot pylon sign); and a future wall sign on the proposed Land Rover building, subject to staff and Commission approval; Page 1 of 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COADMSION RECORD OF ACTION May 1, 1997 6. Development Plan 97 -034DP - Perimeter Center Subarea J - Midwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive 7) That lighting be subject to further review and staff approval; 8) That sidewalks be constructed along the east and west frontages; and 9) That a revised site plan which incorporates all of the conditions be submitted within two weeks. * Christopher Cline agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 4 -1. RESULT: This development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director Page 2 of 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 22 4) at the east edge the parking lot b reened per Code ithin 36 months occupancy unless the adj nt site is develo That sto ater meet the r ements of the Ci gineer; 6) That li ling conform to Dublin Lightin uidelines; 7) tree preservatio providing for tection of the no em treeline be sub fled or to issuance o building permit bject to staff ap vat; 8) That a right -o ay permit be o ned from the D' sion of Rngineeri to abandon existing sto sewer lines and at the abandoned pes be grouted; 9) That th to comply with ecommendations the Barton -Aschm ffic study, dateA Ap ` 6 1997; 10) t the treeline be aintained as requi by City Council ' connection with utility waiver; That the wi of the driveway . ands and the cali of the trees (3.5 hes) meet the require nts of Subarea of the Tuttle Cros ' g text, or that to modifications be appr ed by City Coun ' ; and 12) at a revised Ian pe plan, site di sion plan, and ding plan, reflec ' g all conditions of ap val be submitted t e Planning Divi . n within two wee . Mr. Harian's mo was also for a of the Pagura ` e revised develop nt plan because it will provicl improved traffic circ tion and an attrac ' e water feature, ' three conditions* 1) the site comply wi a recommendati of the Barton -A traffic study, ted pril 16, 1997; 2)// That the pond i esigned to maxi . e its aesthetic ch cteristics, as app ed by staff and install ith Phase 1 of th 'ngs Road Office wilding; and 3) That th st -west link is pleted prior to oc pancy of Phase 2 r the widening Rin oad, whichever curs first. Mr. ale agreed to the ove amended con ' ons. Mr. Lecklider ded the motion, the vote was as fol s: Mr. Peplow es; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, ye , . Sprague, ye • r. Lecklider, ye d Mr. Hari an es. (Combined Vote: Approv -0.) 5. Development Plan 97 -034DP - Perimeter Center Subarea J - Midwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive Bobbie Clarke said the Commission made a positive recommendation on the Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) rezoning April 10. Action on the development plan was tabled. The development plan will be subject to any conditions City Council adds. Most of the current issues deal with landscaping, lighting, grading, and signage. 09- 1082 /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning C( -iission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 23 The site contains 14.8 acres on the southeast corner of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road. This is a 71,000 square foot building with parking for almost 750 cars. She said a new street, Venture Drive, will be continued which will provide the fourth street frontage to this site. A "MAG" wall sign, a low ground sign, and two 15 -foot high ground signs are proposed. The dealership is large and will service many different types of cars. The raised vehicle display "fingers" are not screened as required by Code. However, the exposed ends of each of the fingers fall within Code (maximum display area of 25 percent of the frontage). Staff would like the display area to come closer to meeting the Code in several respects. She said staff recommends approval with nine conditions (as amended): 1) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited and that access along Perimeter Loop Road be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) That the construction of the site be coordinated with the construction °of:public roadways and utilities, subject to approval of the City Engineer; 3) That the design of all storm water management systems, site utilities and improvements, including grading, be subject to the approval of the City Engineer; 4) That the landscape plan be revised to conform more closely to the requirements of the Code and the comments in this report, subject to staff approval; 5) That text be amended to further address landscaping, signage, lighting, grading and building architecture; 6) That signs be brought into compliance with the recommendations in this report, subject to staff approval; 7) That lighting be subject to further review and staff approval; 8) That sidewalks be constructed along the east and west frontages; and 9) That a revised site plan which incorporates all of the conditions be submitted within two weeks. Mr. Harian asked if corporate/national flags were considered as signs. Ms: Clarke said national flags are permitted in the Sign Code, and non - political signs are regulated. She said the maximum pole height for corporate flags is 20 feet. Mr. Harian asked if there was a limit to the number of corporate flags. Ms. Clarke said one corporate flag is permitted for the:site. A choice of one auto company, or a MAG, flag would be permitted as a corporate flag. Any number of national flags could be flown under the Code. Mr. Sprague said they could change the flag every day. Mr. Lecklider asked if the wall sign proposed was appropriate. Ms. Clarke said she liked the sign, however it would set a precedent. A decision needed to made to include wall signs in Perimeter Center, because none are now permitted at this time. Mr. Lecklider asked about the elevation of the display fingers. Ms. Clarke was uneasy with the elevated nature of the fingers, six feet along the freeway. Mr. Lecklider asked if the landscaping needed to be enhanced. Ms. Clarke said more trees were necessary on the site. A one -foot vegetative screen around the display area is also needed. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning C( fission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 24 Mr. Lecklider asked about the lighting of the display fingers. Ms. Clarke said less light than permitted was being proposed on the site. She said there may be justification to work with the applicant for something that was far more subdued, but perhaps more dramatic, than what is normally associated with a car dealership. Ms. Clarke said architectural issues needed to be addressed in the text to insure that in the future, the text appropriately identifies what can be built on the north end of this site. Staff would hope that it could be coordinated with the larger building to the south as much as possible. Ms. Clarke said the Code has no provisions for a site with four frontages. Staff proposes that it be treated as two corner sites, which would be entitled to approximately the same rights as if were two sites with two frontages. Mr. Peplow asked about the access road. Ms. Clarke said an entrance was initially proposed along Perimeter Drive, but it has been removed from the plan. The -only engineering issue deals with the aesthetic and safety placement of the Perimeter Loop entrance. The applicant feels strongly that it should not be relocated for aesthetic reasons. Mr. Harian said he did not see the required display landscaping screening at other dealerships. Ms. Clarke said many dealerships were developed prior to the landscaping code. Difference in the grade elevation between the street and lot sometimes eliminates any screening function, although the mound is in place. Ms. Chinnid- Zuercher said cars pulled onto mounds looked bad. She asked if the display fingers were intended to display in a more appealing way. Chris Cline, attorney, said the gasoline will be only for the cars serviced and it will not be sold. He said the tank will hold 6,000 gallons of gas. Mr. Cline said the curbcut on Perimeter Loop Road is proposed because of the artistry of the site. He understood that the City Engineer wanted 250 feet between offset driveways, but it was not a policy or code. He said the Perimeter Center text only a requires 100 foot offset. Mr. Cline said the customer parking has been increased to 76 spaces. Mr. Cline said they would work with staff to meet the street tree requirement. He said they had 3 -inch caliper street trees for every thirty feet of frontage, but not on center. They have been arranged to complement the site. He said they would meet the Code. Mr. Cline said their sign proposal basically complied with the Sign Code. He said the wall sign was artistic. The wall sign is a signature to the building itself. There are two ground pylon signs of stainless steel material. A translucent plastic material will be used that the light will softly shine through. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Cc fission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 25 The purpose of the complex grading plan was to conceal everything except the cars that are for sale. As you look down the finger display, the cars become less visible. A maximum of four display vehicles will be seen on the fingers. Mr. Cline showed the Commission digital photographs of the building model showing what would be seen from the roadway. Ms. Clarke asked how tall the trees were as shown. Mr. Cline said the Sunburst honey locust were shown at about 25 -30 feet tall. Mr. Cline said Page 2G of the development plan text detailed the permitted display areas. Mr. Harian asked if the front side of the mound was grass. Mr. Cline said yes. Mr. Cline said the relative elevation of roadway on SR. 161 was around .19. contour and the six- foot mound went up to 24. Mr. Cline said the setback_ was :approximately feet.. Mr. Cline said there was a six-inch cement curb around the end of the finger display-areas and the ends of the fingers would be illuminated with accent uplighting on the cars. Mr. Sprague asked how many cars would be exposed to the streets. Mr. Cline said on the 14 fingers there might be three or four cars each. Mr. Cline said there were 60, cut -off gray fixture lights on 14 -foot high poles. Mr. Cline said the two pylon signs proposed were 15 feet tall and the issue was that they did not comply with Code because of the percentages of logo used. He said the logos were needed because they had 12 separate manufacturers. The third sign has been reworked as a six-foot tall directional sign without logos. The wall sign was 50 square feet in size located on the wall that screened the mechanical units. Mr. Kuspan said it would have stainless steel channel letters with backlighting. Ms. Clarke said there was a problem with the height of the wall sign, and that Perimeter Center generally does not permit wall signs. Ground signage in Perimeter Center was defined as a 3 by 5 (height with relationship) on a brick or stone base. The applicant is required to follow the text requirements. She said the MAG ground sign, due to .its.very unusual design, is somewhat smaller. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said the Commission should be consistent in applying the Sign Code. She said they needed a new text written for the whole area to provide a level of consistency. She wants to avoid the same problem occurring again without some text structure. Ms. Clarke asked if there were consensus among the Commission members that wall signage should be incorporated in the Perimeter Center text. Mr. Harian thought they were trying to stay away from wall signs there. Mr. Harian said the sign was neat and asked if a ground sign on US 33 would be considered instead of a wall sign. Mr. Bretlinger said the sign was expensive to produce. They were also looking to brand MAG as a company. He said they would remove the building sign, if necessary. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Cc fission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 26 He said Land Rover, which was proposed next door, had a non - flexible design requirement for a wall mounted sign. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said ultimately, wall signs may be okay, but consistency is necessary. Mr. Bretlinger said if wall signs were forbidden in this area, Land Rover will not participate and the project may not be possible. Ms. Clarke said Page 6 of the existing Perimeter Text has design criteria for signage and addresses specifics such as materials and landscaping, signs with a base, signs mounted on pylons, maximum sign face is 50 square feet, an overall height of eight feet above the top of the adjacent curb, that signs cannot be on mounds, they must be three by five in ratio, but the words "There cannot be any wall signs" are not included. It does state that no sign shall be painted or posted directly on the surface of any building. The text gives permission to use ground signs, nothing else: Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked if the signs proposed were in compliance. Ms. Clarke said they were too tall, the wrong size and design, and the logo area exceeded 20 percent. Mr. Sprague asked if the Chrysler sign complied. Ms. Clarke said the text had been revised yearly since 1987. She said the Chrysler dealership came in originally as the Mercedes dealership and a new text was drafted for Subarea I. When originally zoned, it too was part of Subarea D, and then it became Subarea I. Subarea I was zoned specifically for a dealership, with specific architecture, in accordance with the Trott and Bean plans, and with the signage as presented. Due to the clean look of the sign, it was granted an exception. Mr. Cline asked how Big Bear got a wall sign. Ms. Clarke said the original Perimeter Center rezoning was driven by the desire to construct a retail mall of 250,000 square feet, similar to Worthington Square. That proposal fell apart due to many things, including a sewer ban. When the project was revised, it became an exterior mall. The architectural design exhibited at Perimeter Center shopping center was part of that negotiation process. Wall signage for all other tenants is not illuminated but Big Bear was permitted the sign which is now in place. Staff recommended against, but the Planning Commission and.:City Council approved it. The sign package is included within the text, including an exhibit. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher suggested a committee in the near future to address these issues and return with acceptable parameters to make a decision. Mr. Harian was against wall signs on US 33. A monument sign or a version of another type sign would possibly be preferable. Mr. Peplow, Mr. Lecklider, and Mr. Sprague preferred a ground sign on US 33. Mr. Lecklider concurred about consistency being necessary. He liked the pylon sign, but would like it less than 15 feet tall. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Cc fission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 27 Mr. Sprague said Gorden Flesch was not permitted to have wall signs, and this site should not be either. He said if Range Rover insisted on a wall sign that was otherwise compatible with Dublin's Sign Code, perhaps there was an exception that could be written into Subarea J. Mr. Cline suggested that the tall sign would not work on US 33. Mr. Bretlinger anticipated that in the next 18 months three additional logos would be added to the sign. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher understood the applicant to be requesting two, 15 -foot tall pylon signs, a six -foot pylon sign, and that the MAG sign on the building was withdrawn, and a ground sign facing US 33 would be added. Language in the text is to be added: That the proposed Land Rover center would be permitted a wall sign as approved by staff. Mr. Cline said a four -foot directional MAG sign saying "parts, , fuel deliveries, etc ". would be located at the third entrance to the site. Mr. Sprague said the MAG logo needed to be removed. Mr. Cline said agreed. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said the Commissioners had indicated some acceptance of this application, except for the signage. She said five signs: two, 15 -foot signs, a wall sign on Land Rover to be determined at a later time, a ground sign along SR 33, and a directional sign at the entrance which will not exceed four feet in size were being discussed. Mr. Lecklider was concerned with the sign height. Mr. Harian, Mr. Peplow and Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said 15 -foot signs were acceptable. Mr. Sprague liked the sign, but said 15 feet is too tall. He suggested a height of 13 feet with the base. Ms. Clarke understood that the Commission was not endorsing any 15 -foot high sign, but the specific 15 -foot sign presented. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said that was correct. Ms. Clarke said then it needed to be written in the text. Mr. Harian made a motion for approval of this development plan because it will preserve the desired character along US 33 /SR 161 and within the area, conforms Ao the PCD .regulations, is consistent with the Community Plan, and employs very innovative site design and architecture, with nine conditions: 1) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited and that access along Perimeter Loop Road be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 2) That the construction of the site be coordinated with the construction of public roadways and utilities, subject to approval of the City Engineer; 3) That the design of all storm water management systems, site utilities and improvements, including grading, be subject to the approval of the City Engineer; 4) That the landscape plan be revised to conform more closely to the requirements of the Code and the comments in this report, subject to staff approval; 5) That text be amended to further address landscaping, signage, lighting, grading and building architecture; 6) That signage be permitted as follows: two, 15 -foot pylon signs as presented at this meeting; one, four -foot high direction sign; 'a ground sign facing US 33, subject to staff approval (not to be a 15 -foot pylon sign); and a future wall sign on the proposed Land Rover building, subject to staff and Commission approval; 7) That lighting be subject to further review and staff approval; 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Cc -fission Minutes - May 1, 1997 Page 28 8) That sidewalks be constructed along the east and west frontages; and 9) That a revised site plan which incorporates all of the conditions be submitted within two weeks. Mr. Peplow seconded the motion. Mr. Sprague asked what square footage would be for the four - foot ground sign. Ms. Clarke suggested it be resolved with staff. Mr. Cline agreed to the above conditions. He said the sidewalk on Venture Drive was part of the TIF. Mr. Bowman agreed. The vote was as follows: Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, no; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Approved 4 -1.) The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, s Libby I =arley Administrative Secretary Planning Division 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. (31'Y ( ►F I)1TIAN 5800 %W ffiv Rood Dublin, 01143011 -1236 MwiwADD. 614/161 -6SS0 Fmc: 614/161.6506 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COAEWSSION RECORD OF ACTION April 10, 1997 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Rezoning Application 97 -034Z - Revised, Composite Plan/Development Plan - A idwmiern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive Location: 14.78 acres located at the southeast corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive. Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter Center plan). Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Amendments to the existing Perimeter Center composite plan and development text, under Section 153.058, are proposed to create a new Subarea J. Proposed Use: Proposed auto dealership. Applicant: Charles Aeh, c% Christopher Cline, 37 West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION #1: To approve the revised composite plan portion of this rezoning application, because it is a compatible use, presents the desired character along US 33 /SR 161, conforms to the PCD regulations and the Community Plan, with six conditions: 1) That the text be revised to provide clarification as to visual sale gimmicks, landscaping, lighting, auto display, grading, and building architecture; 2) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited; 3) That a more acceptable sign package be submitted as part of this rezoning and incorporated in the text; 4) . That design for all storm water management, site utilities and improvements including grading meet the approval of the City Engineer; 5) That construction be linked to approval of the preliminary plat for "Wall" Street; and 6) That an appropriate subarea plan be submitted. * Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. Page 1 of 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMUSSION RECORD OF ACTION April 10, 1997 3. Rezoning Application 97 -034Z - Revised Composite Plan/Development Plan - A idwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive (Continued) VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City .Council with a positive recommendation. MOTION #2: To table the development plan portion of the application, as requested by the applicant. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This development plan was tabled, as requested, until May 1, 1997. The proposed lighting, signage, landscaping, building materials, and grading plan will be addressed further at that meeting. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director Page 2 of 2 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 6 Ms. Cl ' 'ci- Zuercher anted a complete pac e regarding the sposition of Davibad. She d wa all residers of David Road to h the potential fo elocation within a w years, not ply six ore" t homes. She cite7e ttle u Crossin est neighborhood Xs an example. The vote as: Mr. Peplow, yes s, Chinnici -2u er, yes; Mr. yes; Harian, yes; Mr. Wrrara, yes; and W. Boring, yes. Ql 2. Rezoning Ap cation 97 -033Z evised :eOwas si lan - o This case s postponed prio the meeting. no discu :der, yes; Mr. S ag ommendatio -0.) �r Parcel and no action taken. 3. Rezoning Application 97 -034Z - Revised Composite Plan/Development Plan - Midwestern Auto Group - 6025 Perimeter Drive Bobbie Clarke presented this combined rezoning and development plan for an auto dealership. The 14.78 acre site is on the southeast corner of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop Road (formerly Wilcox Road). The rezoning would permit all of the current Subarea D uses, mainly office and hotel, plus an auto dealership. The Midwestern Auto Group (MAG) dealership is now located on Post Road and will relocate here. A new loop road is shown to the east of this site, but its name will not be "Wail Street" as shown on the plans. Tax increment financing (T1F) legislation is pending at City Council that would install the full street loop. The two -level building will have three elevated showrooms facing southwest. There are three entrances into the lower service level. A wet pond is located near the main entrance. The parking lot is divided into several use areas. The tips or "fingers" are used for display and the inventory cars are stored in the remaining area. Customers will park along the C- shaped driveway, and employee parking has been designated and screened. A future showroom is shown at the north end of the site, which could become Land Rover, or a showroom could be added to the building. Ms. Clarke said two separate actions are requested: a recommendation on the rezoning application (composite plan) and final action on the development plan. Subarea 7 will permit the current uses and an auto dealership in accordance with this plan. The PCD permits this combined review. Since the initial plan submission, there have been several revisions. The staff report indicates 12- 15 signs for the site; this has been reduced to three signs which have not been reviewed by staff. The specialized lighting proposed is a staff concern. Staff is not stressing blanket compliance with Dublin Lighting Guidelines because such a specialized lighting plan, site plan, and a unique building is proposed. It is requested that lighting be left to staff discretion. Additionally, six-foot high screening is normally required along US 33, but none is proposed here. Ms. Clarke said no architecture had been submitted for the future building along Perimeter Drive. Staff hopes that it would be coordinated with the main MAG building. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 7 Ms. Clarke said staff recommends tabling of the development plan. She said staff recommends approval of the rezoning application with six conditions: 1) That the text be revised to provide clarification as to visual sale gimmicks, landscaping, lighting, auto display, grading, and building architecture; 2) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited; 3) That a more acceptable sign package be submitted as part of this rezoning and incorporated in the text; 4) That design for all storm water management, site utilities and improvements including grading meet the approval of the City Engineer; 5) That construction be linked to approval of the preliminary plat for "Wall" Street; and 6) That an appropriate subarea plan be submitted. Chris Cline, attorney, said this project had integrated landscaping; grading, and parking. He said it will be nationally recognized for its design. This project was designed to look good from every angle. Joe Kuspan, the architect, demonstrated the site model. The site has been cut with a C- shaped loop road that separates the different areas. There are seven display "fingers" to the north and seven to the south. The building has a split level design. The service entrances are lower and hidden, and the showrooms are elevated. He said service vehicles, employee parking and new car inventory will be screened with landscaping. The parking lot at its lowest point is at a 911 - foot elevation. The fingers have landscaping to break up large masses of parking, and they are elevated toward the highest points at the tips. This permits the vehicles on the `end of the mounds to be seen while the other stored inventory is descending downhill. Three -foot landscaping will screen most of the cars. A series of quartz fixtures at the grade level will footlight the wheels and grills of the cars. Other lighting will provide general ambient light in the display spaces. Jerry Smith explained that the amount of asphalt was minimized with the fingers being landscaped and screened. Evergreen screening is mixed with deciduous materials. All the employee parking is screened. The fingers allow for particular cars to be displayed. The entrances will have tree clusters. They will meet the Landscape Code and - Dublin street tree regulations. Mark Brentlinger, Midwestern Auto Group, said his current business has outgrown its Post Road location. The goal is to have a European feel of architecture and design and a timeless building. He hoped the environment will be a pleasant and exciting landmark. The pond will have geese. The glass is to be a Swiss - manufactured clear glass that can eliminate heat gain inside. The landscaping species will be native to this area or reflect the same European countries as the cars. He does not want customers to see anything unattractive or cars not for sale. A lighting consultant will do subtle but dramatic lighting. Mr. Brentlinger does not want to repeat the old "stadium" type lighting used at the old dealership. Mr. Kuspan said each showroom will have an internal ramp which ascends up to display cars and allow customers to visit other showrooms in the building. There will be a retail store for vehicle merchandise on one end. Low, 14 -foot high decorative fixtures will light all of the outer portions 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 8 of the site in addition to the low -level quartz fixtures which floodlight and footlight the cars. He showed three European design fixtures. The rear of the site will be lit with cutoff type 27 -foot high fixtures. Flagpoles for each nation of origin, plus the City of Dublin and MAG corporate flags. are proposed. A main pylon sign will be 15 feet high at the west entrance. Windows at the rear of the building will break up the massing and make it more appealing. A fire wall separates the sales /office space from the service space. A rooftop trench will screen the mechanical equipment. He said the building materials are a combination of colored masonry and a ground face masonry. They were chosen for their rich appearance, which is similar to terrazzo. Some of the masonry will have scored joints. The blocks use marble, granite, and other aggregates to bring out the color and texture. A white PVC roof will be used. The large wall separating the front from the back of the building is a combination of three: materials: -. dark grey ground faced masonry on the lowest 10 feet, white ground faced masonry the middle 10 feet, and white masonry with a white marble chip for the upper 10 feet. Interior and exterior accent lighting on the building walls is proposed. Most of the upper area of the building will be of a natural colored stucco. Aluminum window mullions will be unfinished. The front showrooms are of clear glass. Ms. Chinnici Zuercher asked how many cars are on the lot and in the fingers. Mr. Cline said 737 vehicles cars would be on the lot. He said each one of the fingers had a specific number of cars spelled out in the text. The largest finger had 38 spaces. He said absolutely no display vehicles are permitted in the C- shaped driveway. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked how many 14 -foot light poles and flagpoles are proposed. Mr. Kuspan said there are sixty, 14 -foot pole lights and eight flagpoles. The flag sizes will meet Code. The 22 light poles in the back are 27 feet high and are the typical cut -off, shoe box type. Mr. Harian asked which material was on the front elevation, A -2. Mr. Kuspan said the blocks between the showrooms, inside the knuckles, had a striped pattern. of two textures with a natural grey stucco above. Mr. Harlan asked about the wall where the MAG sign appeared. Mr. Kuspan said it was white. He said the tallest HVAC unit was 5 feet high. Mr. Brentlinger said the used cars would be integrated with the new cars. Mr. Harian asked if a future fourth pod would be identical to the others. Mr. Kuspan said yes. Mr. Harian read a letter from Tim Kelton, Ruscilli, excluding more dealerships from its remaining 77 acres. Ms. Clarke said staff did not request this condition, the developer volunteered it. Mr. Harian asked if the roof elevation of the main building will be seen from US 33. Mr. Kuspan said the white roof was chosen to reflect the sun because the back half of the building was not air conditioned. He said a small portion of the roof might be visible. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 9 Mr. Lecklider liked how the finger design breaks up the mass of asphalt. Mr. Kuspan said each finger was raised at the same slope per each side of the site. They chose a four -foot elevation change facing Perimeter Drive, and a six feet along US 33. They are sloped to provide drama by ascending upwards, and they also block the view of the rest of the cars. Mr. Kuspan said the highest mound was about six feet higher than US 33 and about 120 feet away. Mr. Lecklider asked about the exterior sound system. Mr. Cline said it would play a low -key ambiance -type music. The music will be totally inaudible at the center of any adjoining road. The exterior sound system is subject to staff approval. Loud intercom speakers would not be permitted. Ms. Clarke said the text cites that the sound cannot be heard offsite. Mr. Lecklider asked about the coffee shop. Mr. Cline said the coffee shop will attract the public as well as customers. The goal is to provide a gathering place. Mr. Fenara asked if the flagpoles are signage. Mr. Cline said corporate flags were regulated as signs, and any national flags were permitted. Mr. Banchefsky said there was no limitation on the number of flags representing any political entity. Mr. Ferrara asked if the perimeter of the water feature would be grassed. Mr. Kuspan said typical rip -rap will not be used. They want to find a grass that will work with the retention. Mr.. Cline said they would like to duplicate the pond in front of the Borror Corporation. Mr. Kuspan said there is a "MAG" sign at the end of the wall. He said the stainless, steel, backlit channel letters are proposed, six to eight feet tall. Ms. Clarke said the sign shown by Code, was a roof sign, and not permitted unless written into the development text. She said the revised signage package had not been discussed. Mr. Cline said there were 54 customer parking spaces. Mr. Ferrara said if this was to be a gathering place with a coffee shop he was concerned about adequate parking. Mr. Peplow asked if the landscaping on the model provided was indicative of the quantity of material to be used. Mr. Kuspan said yes. Mr. Peplow asked about the 25 percent of road frontage being used for auto display. Ms. Clarke said it is permitted at dealers citywide and includes US 33. Mr. Cline said the pod displays equal 25 percent of the frontage, and the lot coverage is 60 percent. Ms. Clarke said the display pod calculations have not been verified, and Perimeter Center permits up to 75 percent lot coverage. Mr. Sprague was impressed by the plan. Mr. Cline said the parking lot will not be seen, and the cars for sale will be artistically arranged. It will be the best looking dealership Dublin has ever had. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if 750 cars was the optimum number or would they have less in the beginning. Mr. Cline said 400 cars were for sale presently. 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 10 Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said this was a tremendous presentation and it offers something unique and different. She said the typical car dealership was not what Dublin wanted at this site. She was concerned about the future of the existing MAG site. Mr. Cline said Mr. Brentlinger wanted special cultural events to take place on this site. Ms. Boring asked what the parcel between this and the Crown Mercedes dealership was zoned. Ms. Clarke said the 5 -acre parcel is zoned for hotels, offices, and OLR uses, with a minimum of two-story structures. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher reminded the Commission that two different actions were under review: a rezoning recommendation of a composite plan and action on the development plan. Mr. Lecklider said it was a fabulous design. He was. concerned about _.the .height of the fingers to the southwest. He liked the treatment of the parking on the interior side. Mr. Harian said it was good to have MAG relocate within Dublin. He said was considering approval of the composite plan and tabling the development plan, so that details could be examined more carefully. He however, did not see anything he did not like. Ms. Boring thanked everyone for their thoroughness. She said the model helped a lot. She said Council did not want to see auto dealerships all along US 33. She liked the site layout. This design will set the standard for the remaining properties along the freeway. Mr. Ferrara also was glad 'to have MAG remain in Dublin. He had no problems with the composite plan. He said the new information for the development plan needed to be absorbed. Mr. Peplow said the building architecture blended well with the other car dealerships nearby. He agreed that the development plan needed further verification by staff. Mr. Sprague said the time, thought, and attention to detail put into this plan were very impressive. MAG has exceeded Dublin's high standards. He was concerned about:the-height:of the mounds. Ms. Clarke said a note on the grading plan indicated that there would be a six-foot mound between US 33 and the site, but it was not indicated on the grading plan. It only shows the elevated fingers which is the opposite of what the Code intended. This particular grading plan has never been done elsewhere. Ms. Clarke said because this was such a specialized design, she thought it worthy of discussion at this meeting. Mr. Lecklider's concerns were also raised by staff. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if the Infiniti dealership at the Sawmill/1 -270 has display mounding. Ms. Clarke said a small area was approved but never constructed. She said Code requires a rim of one -foot high vegetation in front of auto display, and the fingers have none. By Code, a 3 -inch caliper tree is required every 30 feet for vehicular display. Staff is most concerned with the 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 11 uplighting at the end of the fingers which will not comply with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. Mr. Ferrara asked about other Dublin dealerships using this type of display elevation and lighting. Ms. Clarke said the door will be open to other dealerships. She said if that was not the Commission's intention to approve such a design elsewhere, this is not a good site plan. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if any other dealership had submitted a creative way of presenting themselves. Mr. Ferrara said Infiniti had by using their remote location for display. Mr. Cline said there needs to be differentiation on why this manner of display was permitted and another was not. He said this plan has fewer vehicles displayed from the street (70) than other dealers have now. Mr. Ferrara said three dealers are affected by the SR 161 widening; and he predicted that they will have new plans which may include elevated display areas. Mr. Harian said this development plan should be tabled so the Commission could give specific reasons why this plan was approved for the record at a later date. Mr. Ferrara said the Commission should not give anyone a competitive advantage. He asked for clarification of Condition 1. Ms. Clarke said the text made several references to the plan for standards, but the plan was not specific or did not conform to Codes as required by the text. The text language is different from the Mercedes text: visual sales gimmicks are not permitted on the Mercedes "site ", and the MAG text says none are permitted on the cars. Lighting cannot be brought into compliance with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines, but the text says otherwise. Staff needs to verify the auto display calculations and the signage conflicts. Mr: Sprague said issues still needed to be reviewed. This may set a precedent in the future, and the justification should be solid. Mr. Peplow agreed. Ms. Clarke said the text needs improvement and the northern building was not mentioned in it. Mr. Ferrara said he did not want to sit through another presentation, but felt the development plan should be tabled. Ms. Boring, Mr. Harian and Mr. Lecklider agreed. Mr. Banchefsky said only the composite plan and not the development plan will be reviewed by Council. Mr. Cline said the development plan will be presented with the composite plan. Mr. Cline asked if the development plan could be tabled to May 1. Mr. Ferrara made the motion to approve the revised composite plan because it is a compatible use, presents the desired character along US 33 /SR 161, and conforms to the PCD regulations and the Community Plan, with six conditions: 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning/Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 10, 1997 Page 12 1) That the text be revised to provide clarification as to visual sale gimmicks, landscaping, lighting, auto display, grading, and building architecture; 2) That access to Perimeter Drive be prohibited; 3) That a more acceptable sign package be submitted as part of this rezoning and incorporated in the text; 4) That design for all storm water management, site utilities and improvements, including grading, meet the approval of the City Engineer; 5) That construction be linked to approval of the preliminary plat for "Wall" Street; and 6) That an appropriate subarea plan be submitted. Mr. Harian seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; and Mr. Ferrara. (Approved 7 -0.) Mr. Ferrara made the motion to table the development plan, as requested by the applicant, until May 1, 1997. Mr. Harian seconded, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnid- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Tabled 7 -0.) Mr. Ferrara wanted to make sure that all information was distributed to the Commission in time to review it carefully. Ms. Clarke said she needed to talk to Mr. Cline about the meeting dates. Mr. Cline said the rezoning composite plan needed to be heard by Council on May 19 in order to not hold up the TIF. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher preferred that this case be heard on May 1, so that if there were any problems, there would be another meeting available before the Council review. 4. �opment itional Use velopment PI - 35 and 6239 Pe . John Tale ' o presented this ditional loca the F -1 Subar f Perimeter co on uses. He a rezoning was fi This develop plan is short 1- 037CU/DP - Cirnmeter Center Drive / use appliggion and deveIop�pff plan for 1.5 acres Cen . Office use is pe tted and preschools e modify the Perim r Center text to allo roof spaces, and f recommends full mp 'ance with parking r irements per C Elevation buildi , to bring the sto material to the p t hool building a compatible with fix building sign meet Code. S r= hedge along private drive. interior landscaDi are deficient. 1 Talentino said this oposed medical will have the sameffferglass roofing as th -evisi to the rear and si of the presch s nd level, are requ Staff believ the neighboring buildin The applicant ees that nmends repeati a stone pilaster d landscape landscapin eets Code, but er facets of the is brick on the rst level of all a ations and ding build' s. He said the iWelODment text 09- 108Z /FDP Rezoning /Final Development Plan MAG Volvo 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting lelef March 17, 1997 19 Ordin3R No. 40 -97 - An Ordina a Providing for a Chan n Zoning for 10.089 A of Land Located on the uthwest Corner of Rin oad an cr d Paul Blazer emorial Parkway from: A, Restricted Suburba esidential District to: P Planned Commerce Di let. (Pagura and Helm ght Properties) (Appl uke Realty c/o Jeff , Smith & Hale, 37 W. Br Street Suite 725 C 1 43215) Mrs. Bonin . troduced the ordinance Mr bell seconded the LkALLUMMIJ - Mrs. lwell yes; Mayor V yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Boring, yes; Mr , o um referral to the Plan and Zoning �, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes ; M . e Pittaluga, yes. Ordinance No. 41 -97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.78 Acres of Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Midwestern Auto Group) (Applicant: Midwestern Auto Group, Charles Aeh, 5016 Post Road, Dublin, OH 43017) Mr. McCash introduced the ordinance and moved referral to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, Reiner, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. p ,yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. dinance No. 42 -97 - A rdinance to Update the rterial Traffic Plan for t City of Dublin to Im ve Circulation to the No and West of SawmilUl Intersection. Mr, Campbell i oduced the ordinance. Ms. Clarke ted that this item is sche ed on the Planning Co ion agenda next week, owing referral from Cou Mr . tillwell suggested this w d be a nice opportunity fo a Transportation Task orce to provide input as w as the Planning Commiss' . It is her understanding y are meeting concurrent next Thursday. Mr. Campbell mov to refer this to the Planni and Zoning Commission to the Transportation ask Force for their review Mrs. Stillw seconded the motion. Mr. Ca bell amended his motion include that the Transpo ion Task Force and the Pl ng Commission report b to Council prior to the ti of second reading on Ap 4, 1997. Mrs. Stillwell seconded a amended motion. i s. Boring, yes; Mr. Ca ell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittal Reiner, yes; Mr . tillwell, yes; Mayor Kra uber, yes; Mr. b ^ , 'yes' Mr. 09- 108Z /FDP Ordin ce No. 43 -97 - An Ordin ce Amending Certain Rezoning /Final Development Plan 96 ` ompensation Plan ") a Authorizing Certain W MAG Volvo ob Classifications Retro tvely. 6335 Perimeter Loop Rd.