Ordinance 02-21
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager
Date: March 2, 2021
Initiated
By:
Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planning Director
Zachary C. Hounshell, Planner I
Re: Amended Ord. 02-21
Rezoning approximately 11.37 acres from R, Rural district to PUD, Planned Unit
Development district for development of 30 single-family lots with 2.62 acres of
open space, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Shier Rings
and Cosgray Roads the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 (Case #20-
092Z/PDP).
Summary
Ordinance 02-21 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning from R, Rural District, to
PUD, Planned Unit Development District, for 11.37 acres located in Franklin County to allow for
the future development of 30 single-family homes with 2.62 acres of open space.
Updates
At the first reading of Ordinance 02-21 on February 8, 2021, City Council members raised
several items including: open space maintenance responsibilities and costs, foundation
materials, rear egress stair and patio details, air conditioner locations, fence requirements, and
garage door percentages. In response to the questions and concerns, the applicant has updated
the development text and provided additional supporting documentation for City Council’s
consideration. The Open Space and Architectural Requirements sections of the development
text have been updated, as detailed below:
• Section C(8) is updated to require a cost sharing agreement between the HOA and City
Engineer, to be determined with the Final Development Plan, for the long term care and
maintenance of the two stormwater management basins (Page 3). Additionally, the
applicant has provided anticipated HOA fees estimating the maintenance costs for care
of reserves (A-C) and the two stormwater basins.
• Section G(3) to require stone-clad foundations (Page 5), weatherproof composite board
materials for rear door landings (Page 6), rear yard air conditioner locations for lots 23-
30 (Page 6), and patios be constructed by the developer for lots 23-30 (Page 6). Fence
provisions have been removed from the development text.
• Section G(3)(e) is updated to clarify the calculation of garage openings, stating that the
opening widths of garage doors (excluding any posts or areas between the garage
doors) may occupy no more than 48 percent of the front elevation, or alternatively 64
percent of the front elevation when including the posts and all areas around the garage
doors (Page 6). Additionally, Exhibit L0.05 has been provided to graphically depict the
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017-1090
Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
March 2, 2021
Page 2 of 5
garage opening calculation for each proposed front elevation.
• Exhibit L2.00 has also been provided to display permissible patio areas for each lot
within the development. The exhibit is required to be presented to each home purchaser
to clearly identify parameters of rear yard patio areas per Section G(3)(i)(3) (Page 6).
Background
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed an application for a Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan and made a recommendation of approval with conditions to City Council on
December 10, 2020 finding the proposal meets the review criteria. This application was
reviewed in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat for which the Commission also recommended
approval. Prior to this review, the Commission reviewed and provided non-binding feedback on
an Informal Review of this application on September 17, 2020. The initial proposal included 34
single-family lots with 2.25 acres of open space. At the Informal Review, Commission members
expressed concerns regarding the lack of usable open space on the site, and requested that the
density of the development be decreased. The applicant addressed the comments with the
Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan application.
Community Plan
Future Land Use & Density
The Future Land Use Map in the Community Plan designates the site as a Mixed Residential
Low Density (2-3 dwelling units per acre). This designation is intended to allow for a mix of
housing options and a transition from existing single-family neighborhoods. Larger sites are
expected to incorporate a mix of housing types and are to be designed to look, feel and
function as a cohesive neighborhood. Smaller sites, such as the site under consideration, may
include a single housing type, appropriately scaled to the surrounding development context,
and consistent with Special Area Plan recommendations, where applicable. The site is not
contemplated under any Special Area Plan.
In accordance with the Community Plan recommendation, a density of 2.63 dwellings per acre
is proposed with the development. The proposed density provides a transition from Ballantrae –
Subarea E (2.09 dwellings per acre) to the West Innovation District.
Thoroughfare Plan
Adjacent to the site, Shier Rings Road and Cosgray Road are designated as Collector Streets.
Collector streets provide both access to property and traffic circulation within residential
neighborhoods and commercial or industrial areas. Shier Rings Road, from Cosgray Road to
Eiterman Road, is two lanes with a 50-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for
improvements to the right-of-way by extending the width of the right-of-way from 50 feet to 60
feet. Cosgray Road, from Tuttle Crossing Boulevard to Shier Rings Road, is two lanes and has a
60-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for improvements to the right-of-way by
potentially expanding to three lanes, and extending the width of the right-of-way from 60 feet
to 70 feet.
The proposed development provides additional right-of-way to expand the width of Shier Rings
Road to the north to accompany a westbound left turn lane into the site.
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
March 2, 2021
Page 3 of 5
Overview
Site
The 11.37-acre site has approximately 580 feet of frontage along Cosgray Road and 450 feet of
frontage along Shier Rings Road. The site is comprised of one 6.77 acres parcel plus two partial
parcels totaling 4.60 acres. Presently, the western portion of the site is used for agriculture and
contains minimal natural features. The eastern portion of the site contains a tree stand. The site
borders the Ballentrae Subdivision – Subarea E to the south and east.
Preliminary Development Plan
The development is comprised of 30 single-family lots, 2.62 acres of open space, and three new
public streets. The proposed development provides a variety of lot sizes, ranging from 0.16-acre
to 0.52-acre. All lots will be internally oriented towards the new public streets.
The single access into the site is from Shier Rings Road onto Lockroy Drive accessing two public
streets terminating in cul-de-sacs. All proposed streets are public. The street names proposed
have been approved by the City, following the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in
December.
2.62 acres of open space are provided across reserves (A-C). Reserves A and C will each
contain a stormwater management basin.
Details
Uses
The development text permits single-family residential with one principal structure per lot.
Model homes and sales offices are permitted in accordance with the Zoning Code.
Lot Requirements
Development Standard Requirement
Minimum Lot Width 64 feet
Front Setback 20 feet
Side Yard Setback
Lots 1-15: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
14-foot separation between structures.
Lots 16-30: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
16-foot separation between structures.
Rear Yard Setback
Lots 1-5: 45 feet
Lots 6-22: 30 feet
Lots 23-30: 20 feet (Patios may encroach 10 feet into
rear setback)
Lot Coverage 60%
Architecture and Building Materials
The development text permits single-family homes at a maximum of 35 feet in height, per
Zoning Code requirements. The development text permits a variety of primary materials and
trim materials. Primary materials include: stone, manufactured stone, wood, stucco,
cementitious siding, or any combination of the choices; and trim materials include: cementitious
board wood, aluminum (for gutters and downspouts only), EIFS, copper, or fiber-cement
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
March 2, 2021
Page 4 of 5
products. Permitted roof materials are dimensional asphalt shingles, wood shingles, slate
shingles, copper, standing seam metal, and/or tile. The development text requires homes with
chimneys be clad with stone or manufactured stone. The proposed garages will be designed
with a decorative carriage style. The opening widths of the garage doors (excluding any posts
or areas between the garage doors) will occupy no more than 48 percent of the front elevation,
or alternatively 64 percent of the front elevation when including the posts and all areas around
the garage doors, as defined in the updated development text.
The development text was updated to include requirements of stone-clad foundations for all
homes, and weatherproof composite board materials for rear door landings. Air conditioner
units will be located to the rear of homes on lots 23-30. Additionally, lots 23-30 will have
preprogrammed patios to the rear of the home with the construction of each home. The
developer will not preprogram patios for lots 1-22, but will present each home purchaser an
exhibit locating the parameters of rear yard patio area for each lot. Fencing is subject to the
requirements of the zoning code.
Open Space and Landscaping
Three reserves of open space are proposed to be established. Details are as follows:
Reserve Description Acres Ownership Maintenance
A Intersection of Shier Rings Road and
Cosgray Road may include pond, gazebo,
shelter, paths, and entry feature.
1.48 City of Dublin HOA*
B East of the entry drive for entry feature
(passive area).
0.28 City of Dublin HOA
C Southeast corner of development may
include pond and benches (passive area).
0.86 City of Dublin HOA*
*Maintenance of the Stormwater Management basins in Reserves A & C will be the responsibility of the City of Dublin, with a cost-
sharing agreement between the City of Dublin and the HOA for the maintenance and care of the basins.
Transportation Analysis
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) as required for a rezoning application.
The study provides analysis of the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed development
and models the traffic on the existing roadways. The TIS analyzed the Shier Rings Road &
Cosgray Road, Shier Rings Road & Eiterman Road, and Shier Rings Road & Site Access Point
intersections. The TIS also incorporates the future Shier Rings Road realignment project
(University Boulevard) into the analysis.
As identified in the TIS, the proposal includes the construction of a westbound left turn lane on
Shier Rings Road to serve the development. This left turn lane will be constructed at the same
time as the local street construction for the development. The TIS has been accepted by the
City of Dublin Engineering Division. The applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right-
of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound
left turn lane, and has identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for necessary right-of-
way to the City.
Stormwater Management and Utilities
The proposal is required to meet City of Dublin Chapter 53 Stormwater Management and
Stream Protection Code by constructing multiple stormwater management retention basins,
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
March 2, 2021
Page 5 of 5
storm sewer pipes, and associated structures. The applicant has located and sized these
facilities based on a stormwater management report that analyzed the existing and anticipated
drainage and provided calculations for the sizing of the retention basins and storm sewer pipes.
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
At the December 10, 2020 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval with the following conditions. The applicant has addressed conditions 1, 6, 7, 9, and
10. The remainder of the conditions will be addressed at the time of final development plan.
Staff Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Conditions:
1) That the applicant continues to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to
determine acceptable street names and will need to update the plans with the approved
street names prior to City Council submittal;
2) That the applicant continues to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater
management compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of
Ordinances;
3) That the applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to
accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn
lane as well as to identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-
of-way prior to City Council submittal;
4) That the applicant work with Staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree survey and
development plan prior to final development plan submittal;
5) That the applicant should continue to work with Staff to determine the appropriate
number of replacement trees to be located within the landscape buffer;
6) The applicant should revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard
setback for lots 1-5 to reflect what is shown on the development plan;
7) The applicant maintain lot 18 until the lot is sold for development;
8) That the applicant provide open space amenities in accordance to the Commission
comments with the final development plan;
9) The text be revised to eliminate asphalt drives; and,
10) The applicant change the fencing height from 6 feet to 4 feet and provide a consistent
fence detail with the FDP.
City Council Recommendation
Recommendation of approval of Ordinance 02-21 at the second reading/public hearing on
March 8, 2021.
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager
Date: February 2, 2021
Initiated By: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planning Director
Zachary C. Hounshell, Planner I
Re: Ord. 02-21
Rezoning approximately 11.37 acres from R, Rural district to PUD, Planned Unit
Development district for development of 30 single-family lots with 2.62 acres of
open space, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Shier Rings
and Cosgray Roads the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 (Case #20-
092Z/PDP).
Summary
Ordinance 02-21 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning from R, Rural District, to
PUD, Planned Unit Development District, for 11.37 acres located in Franklin County to allow for
the future development of 30 single-family homes with 2.62 acres of open space.
Background
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed an application for a Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan and made a recommendation of approval with conditions to City Council on
December 10, 2020 finding the proposal meets the review criteria. This application was
reviewed in conjunction with the Preliminary Plat for which the Commission also recommended
approval. Prior to this review, the Commission reviewed and provided non-binding feedback on
an Informal Review of this application on September 17, 2020. The initial proposal included 34
single-family lots with 2.25 acres of open space. At the Informal Review, Commission members
expressed concerns regarding the lack of usable open space on the site, and requested that the
density of the development be decreased. The applicant addressed the comments with the
Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan application.
Community Plan
Future Land Use & Density
The Future Land Use Map in the Community Plan designates the site as a Mixed Residential
Low Density (2-3 dwelling units per acre). This designation is intended to allow for a mix of
housing options and a transition from existing single-family neighborhoods. Larger sites are
expected to incorporate a mix of housing types and are to be designed to look, feel and
function as a cohesive neighborhood. Smaller sites, such as the site under consideration, may
include a single housing type, appropriately scaled to the surrounding development context,
and consistent with Special Area Plan recommendations, where applicable. The site is not
contemplated under any Special Area Plan.
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017-1090
Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
February 2, 2021
Page 2 of 4
In accordance with the Community Plan recommendation, a density of 2.63 dwellings per acre
is proposed with the development. The proposed density provides a transition from Ballantrae –
Subarea E (2.09 dwellings per acre) to the West Innovation District.
Thoroughfare Plan
Adjacent to the site, Shier Rings Road and Cosgray Road are designated as Collector Streets.
Collector streets provide both access to property and traffic circulation within residential
neighborhoods and commercial or industrial areas. Shier Rings Road, from Cosgray Road to
Eiterman Road, is two lanes with a 50-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for
improvements to the right-of-way by extending the width of the right-of-way from 50 feet to 60
feet. Cosgray Road, from Tuttle Crossing Boulevard to Shier Rings Road, is two lanes and has a
60-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for improvements to the right-of-way by
potentially expanding to three lanes, and extending the width of the right-of-way from 60 feet
to 70 feet.
The proposed development provides additional right-of-way to expand the width of Shier Rings
Road to the north to accompany a westbound left turn lane into the site.
Overview
Site
The 11.37-acre site has approximately 580 feet of frontage along Cosgray Road and 450 feet of
frontage along Shier Rings Road. The site is comprised of one 6.77 acres parcel plus two partial
parcels totaling 4.60 acres. Presently, the western portion of the site is used for agriculture and
contains minimal natural features. The eastern portion of the site contains a tree stand. The site
borders the Ballentrae Subdivision – Subarea E to the south and east.
Preliminary Development Plan
The development is comprised of 30 single-family lots, 2.62 acres of open space, and three new
public streets. The proposed development provides a variety of lot sizes, ranging from 0.16-acre
to 0.52-acre. All lots will be internally oriented towards the new public streets.
The single access into the site is from Shier Rings Road onto Lockroy Drive accessing two public
streets terminating in cul-de-sacs. All proposed streets are public. The street names proposed
have been approved by the City, following the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in
December.
2.62 acres of open space are provided across reserves (A-C). Reserves A and C will each
contain a stormwater management basin.
Details
Uses
The development text permits single-family residential with one principal structure per lot.
Model homes and sales offices are permitted in accordance with the Zoning Code.
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
February 2, 2021
Page 3 of 4
Lot Requirements
Development Standard Requirement
Minimum Lot Width 64 feet
Front Setback 20 feet
Side Yard Setback
Lots 1-15: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
14-foot separation between structures.
Lots 16-30: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
16-foot separation between structures.
Rear Yard Setback
Lots 1-5: 45 feet
Lots 6-22: 30 feet
Lots 23-30: 20 feet (Patios may encroach 10 feet into
rear setback)
Lot Coverage 60%
Architecture and Building Materials
The development text permits single-family homes at a maximum of 35 feet in height, per
Zoning Code requirements. The development text permits a variety of primary materials and
trim materials. Primary materials include: brick, stone, manufactured stone, wood, stucco,
cementitious siding, or any combination of the choices; and trim materials include: cementitious
board wood, aluminum (for gutters and downspouts only), EIFS, copper, or fiber-cement
products. Permitted roof materials are dimensional asphalt shingles, wood shingles, slate
shingles, copper, standing seam metal, and/or tile. The development text requires homes with
chimneys be clad with brick, stone, or manufactured stone. The proposed garages details
include a decorative carriage style and are not permitted to occupy more than 50% of the front
elevation of each home.
Open Space and Landscaping
Three reserves of open space are proposed to be established. Details are as follows:
Reserve Description Acres Ownership Maintenance
A Intersection of Shier Rings Road and
Cosgray Road may include pond, gazebo,
shelter, paths, and entry feature.
1.48 City of Dublin HOA*
B East of the entry drive for entry feature
(passive area).
0.28 City of Dublin HOA
C Southeast corner of development may
include pond and benches (passive area).
0.86 City of Dublin HOA*
*Maintenance of the Stormwater Management basins in Reserves A & C will be the responsibility of the City of Dublin.
Transportation Analysis
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) as required for a rezoning application.
The study provides analysis of the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed development
and models the traffic on the existing roadways. The TIS analyzed the Shier Rings Road &
Cosgray Road, Shier Rings Road & Eiterman Road, and Shier Rings Road & Site Access Point
intersections. The TIS also incorporates the future Shier Rings Road realignment project
(University Boulevard) into the analysis.
Memo re. Ord. 02-21 Ayrshire Farms – Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
February 2, 2021
Page 4 of 4
As identified in the TIS, the proposal includes the construction of a westbound left turn lane on
Shier Rings Road to serve the development. This left turn lane will be constructed at the same
time as the local street construction for the development. The TIS has been accepted by the
City of Dublin Engineering Division. The applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right-
of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound
left turn lane, and has identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for necessary right-of-
way to the City.
Stormwater Management and Utilities
The proposal is required to meet City of Dublin Chapter 53 Stormwater Management and
Stream Protection Code by constructing multiple stormwater management retention basins,
storm sewer pipes, and associated structures. The applicant has located and sized these
facilities based on a stormwater management report that analyzed the existing and anticipated
drainage and provided calculations for the sizing of the retention basins and storm sewer pipes.
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
At the December 10, 2020 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
approval with the following conditions. The applicant has addressed conditions 1, 6, 7, 9, and
10. The remainder of the conditions will be addressed at the time of final development plan.
Staff Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Conditions:
1) That the applicant continues to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to
determine acceptable street names and will need to update the plans with the approved
street names prior to City Council submittal;
2) That the applicant continues to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater
management compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of
Ordinances;
3) That the applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to
accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn
lane as well as to identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-
of-way prior to City Council submittal;
4) That the applicant work with Staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree survey and
development plan prior to final development plan submittal;
5) That the applicant should continue to work with Staff to determine the appropriate
number of replacement trees to be located within the landscape buffer;
6) The applicant should revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard
setback for lots 1-5 to reflect what is shown on the development plan;
7) The applicant maintain lot 18 until the lot is sold for development;
8) That the applicant provide open space amenities in accordance to the Commission
comments with the final development plan;
9) The text be revised to eliminate asphalt drives; and,
10) The applicant change the fencing height from 6 feet to 4 feet and provide a consistent
fence detail with the FDP.
City Council Recommendation
Recommendation of approval of Ordinance 02-21 at the second reading/public hearing on
February 22, 2021.
Memo re. Ord. 04-21 – Historic District Rezoning
February 16, 2021
Page 3 of 3
City Council Recommendation
Recommendation of approval of Ordinance 04-21 at the second reading/public hearing on
February 22, 2021.
Trafalgar LnL a r n e Dr
V a n d e le u rPlHollidayL nDublinParkDrCosgray RdSITE
20-092Z-PDPRezoning/Preliminary Development PlanAyreshire FarmsPID: 272-000166 F0460230
Feet
DarreeFields
Golf Centerat Sports Ohio
WashingtonTWP
Ballantrae
SHEET INDEXL0.00Cover PageL0.01Existing Conditions PlanL0.02Illustrative Site PlanL0.03Architectural ElevationsL0.04Architectural ElevationsL1.00Preliminary Development PlanL1.01Preliminary Development Plan Enlargement NWL1.02Preliminary Development Plan Enlargement SWL1.03Preliminary Development Plan Enlargement EastL1.04Preliminary Development Landscape Plan NWL1.05Preliminary Development Landscape Plan SWL1.06Preliminary Development Landscape Plan EastL1.07Pond Site Layout PlansL1.08Maintenance Responsibility Plan NWL1.09Maintenance Responsibility Plan SWL1.10Maintenance Responsibility Plan EastL2.00Preliminary Conceptual Home Development PlanL3.00Preliminary Tree Removal PlanC100Grading PlanC101Road Profiles & Typical SectionC200Utility PlanC300Preliminary Survey PlatC400Turn Lane SchematicC500Autoturn ExhibitPROJECT NO. 19053DATE: November 19, 2020VICINITY MAPNORTHSCALE: 1" = 1000'*COSGRAY RD.SHIER RINGS RD.SITE2550 Corporate Exchange Dr.Suite 300Columbus, Ohio 43231p 614.901.2235Columbus100 Northwoods BlvdSuite AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village SquareFloor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netPREPARED FORPREPARED BYMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, Ohio 43016Ayrshire FarmsDublin, OhioPreliminary Development Plan Submittal LARNE DR.20-002-RES
EXISTING CROP LANDZONING: RESIDENTIAL558.21'134.53'SITE AREA:11.37 +/- ACRES1058.44'127.71'273.79'242.61'
359.41'
505.47'ZONING: RESIDENTIALZONING: RESIDENTIALZONING:RESIDENTIALEXISTING PEAR THICKETTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE ROWTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE ROWTO REMAINEXISTING TREE ROWTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING STRUCTURETO BE REMOVEDEXISTING PAD ANDDEBRIS TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREE ROWTO REMAINEXISTING SANITARYEASEMENTSheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL0.01ExistingConditionsPlanExisting Conditions PlanSCALE: 1" = 60'-0"03060120COSGRAY RD.SHIER RINGS RD.LEGENDNOTE:BASE FILES GENERATED FROMCOUNTY AND CITY GIS FILES.INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR LINEINDEX CONTOUR LINEUTILITY PROVIDER NOTE:ELECTRIC SERVICE - AEPTELEPHONE SERVICE - AT&TWATER SERVICE - CITY OF DUBLINSANITARY SERVICE - CITY OF DUBLINNATURAL GAS - COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIODRAINAGE NOTE:THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE COSGRAYCREEK WATERSHED AND GENERALLY DRAINSFROM NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST AWAYFROM THE CENTER OF THE SITE. THE SITE ISENTIRELY OUT OF THE 100-YEARFLOODPLAINVICINITY MAPUTILITIESREGIONAL CONTEXT MAP2000' RADIUSSITELARNE DR.TRAFALGAR LN.
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL0.02IllustrativeSite PlanIllustrative Site PlanSCALE: 1" = 40'-0"0204080
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL0.03ArchitecturalElevationsThe Bristol IIThe Bristol IRear ElevationRear ElevationFront ElevationFront ElevationNOTE:ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY.FINAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS WILL BE SUPPLIED AS PARTOF INDIVIDUAL HOME OWNER BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL0.04ArchitecturalElevationsThe ReddingThe CarrickThe AberdeenRear ElevationRear ElevationRear ElevationFront ElevationFront ElevationFront ElevationNOTE:ARCHITECTURALELEVATIONS ARECONCEPTUAL ONLY.FINAL BUILDINGELEVATIONS WILL BESUPPLIED AS PART OFINDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER BUILDINGPERMIT PROCESS
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date 02/19/21ByGB/TFScale As NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p 614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL0.05ConceptualBuildingFrontageCalculationsFront ElevationFront ElevationFront ElevationNOTE:ARCHITECTURALELEVATIONS ARECONCEPTUAL ONLY.FINAL BUILDINGELEVATIONS WILL BESUPPLIED AS PART OFINDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER BUILDINGPERMIT PROCESSFront ElevationFront Elevation16'-0"4'-0"8'-0"16'-0"2'-10"8'-0"16'-0"2'-10"8'-0"16'-0"2'-10"8'-0"16'-0"2'-10"8'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"50'-0"64%58.6%60%60%60%2'-0"2'-0"1'-4"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"1'-2"1'-2"1'-2"1'-2"
50'10'50'20'10'50'10'15'50'10'64' TYP.6'6'66' TYP.6'6'130'
180'
6'6'64' TYP.155'6'6'66' TYP.124'-10"105'Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.00PreliminaryDevelopmentPlanPreliminary Development PlanSCALE: 1" = 50'-0"02550100SIGNATURES:APPLICANTDATEPLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY, CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIODATENAMEPLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ##/##/2020CITY COUNCIL APPROVALDATELOCKROY DR.DORNELL CT.DRUMMORE CT.ZONING:RESIDENTIALZONING:
RESIDENTIALZONING:RESIDENTIALLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12LOT 13LOT 14LOT 15LOT 16LOT 17LOT 18LOT 19LOT 20LOT 21LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26LOT 27LOT 28LOT 29LOT 30RETENTION PONDW/ FOUNTAINRESERVE A AREA:± 1.48 ACRESERVE B AREA:± 0.28 ACRESERVE C AREA:± 0.86 ACRETENTION PONDW/ FOUNTAINSHIER RINGS RD.COSGRAY RD.EXISTING OVERHEADUTILITY LINESR.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE R.O.W. R.O.W.SEE SHEETS L1.01, L1.04 & L1.08SEE SHEETS L1.03, L1.06 & L1.10SEE SHEETS L1.02, L1.05 & L1.09EXISTING STREETPROPOSED STREETEXISTINGBIKEPATHPROPOSEDBIKEPATHEXTENSIONPOND SETBACKPOND SETBACKPOND SETBACK
PON
D
S
E
T
B
AC
K
LEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEEXISTINGEVERGREENTREESITE DATA:TOTAL AREA OF SITE11.37 ACTOTAL UNITS OVERALL30 SINGLE FAMILY HOMESTOTAL GROSS OVERALL DENSITY+/- 2.63 DU/ACRESERVE AREA A+/- 1.48 ACRESERVE AREA B+/- 0.28 ACRESERVE AREA C+/- 0.86 ACPARKINGPROVIDED PER EACHMIN. 2 CAR GARAGE +SINGLE FAMILY HOME 2 DRIVEWAY SPACES10' TREE PRESERVATION ZONE10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER10' LANDSCAPE BUFFERPROPOSED TURN LANEAND WIDENED STREETPROPOSED R.O.W.25' LANDSCAPEBUFFER
0+001+00
0+00
1+00
2+003+0020'20'50'6'6'R51'R40'28'28'50'50'10'6'6'36'20'20'20'20'20'25'50'LOT 24LOT 25LOT 30LOT 28LOT 29LOT 2LOT 23LOT 3LOT 110'R
2
5
'R25'6'6'6'6'R75'R75'8'4'8'4'50'Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.01PreliminaryDevelopmentPlanEnlargementNWPreliminary Development Plan Enlargement NWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"015306065'-4"64'64'
66'66'66'34'132'109'20'132'155'20'111'-8"100'-6"80'-10"105'102'-9"105'124'-10"105'30'-6"20'20'SEE SHEET L1.02SEE SHEET L1.03 SHIER RINGS RD.COSGRAY RD.20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK20' MIN. REARYARD SETBACK45' MIN. REARYARD SETBACK20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK8' WIDE SHARED USEPATH EXTENSIONLOCKROY DR.
DORNELL CT.RETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAINENTRY FEATURE& SIGNAGE20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENTLEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREER.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.
PROPERTY LINE PROP. R.O.W.PROPOSEDGAZEBOOR SHADESTRUCTURENOTE: TYPICAL DIMENSIONS ARETAKEN TO BACK OF CURB PER CITYOF DUBLIN STANDARD DETAILSDRAINAGEEASEMENTLANDSCAPEEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT
1+002+003+004+004+733+004+004+700+0020'20'50'20'20'28'28'36'20'20'20'R100'20'20'25'LOT 25LOT 26LOT 10LOT 11LOT 9LOT 8LOT 28LOT 27LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 22LOT 320'10'8'4'8'4'50'R25'R25'Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.02PreliminaryDevelopmentPlanEnlargementSWPreliminary Development Plan Enlargement SWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060SEE SHEET L1.01SEE SHEET L1.03 155'124'-10"105'114'-2"154'-4"162'-3"235'144'-10"
130'
130'
130'166'103'-10"64'64'85'-11"64'COSGRAY RD.
LOCKROY DR.DORNELL CT.20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK20' MIN. REARYARD SETBACK45' MIN. REARYARD SETBACK20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK30' MIN. REARYARD SETBACK20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENTLEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREER.O.W.PROPERTY LINE10' TREE PRESERVATION ZONENOTE: TYPICAL DIMENSIONS ARETAKEN TO BACK OF CURB PER CITYOF DUBLIN STANDARD DETAILS20' UTILITYEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT25'
4+733+004+004+700+001+002+003+004+004+4150'6'6'R51
'20'6'6'50'20'28'R40'28'20'10'10'50'20'36'20'20'20'10'LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 10LOT 11LOT 19LOT 15LOT 17LOT 16LOT 22LOT 21LOT 20LOT 1810'10'R25'R75'Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.03PreliminaryDevelopmentPlanEnlargementEastPreliminary Development Plan Enlargement EastSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060SEE SHEET L1.01130'64'LOCKROY DR.20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK30' MIN. REARYARD SETBACKSEE SHEET L1.02DRUMMORE CT.130'130'130'130'
130'64'64'64'64'20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK20' MIN. REARYARD SETBACKRETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAIN20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT179'-3"180'-2"181'182'
131'-8"
140'-
1
0
"20'66'66'66'66'66'98'-6"109'-6"121'170'-2"20' MIN. FRONTYARD SETBACK30' MIN. REARYARD SETBACKTEMPORARYNO BUILDEASEMENTLEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEEXISTINGEVERGREENTREECLUSTERMAILBOXPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE178'-4"13'-10"10' TREE PRESERVATION ZONE10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFERNOTE: TYPICAL DIMENSIONS ARETAKEN TO BACK OF CURB PER CITYOF DUBLIN STANDARD DETAILS20' UTILITYEASEMENTDRAINAGEEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT2' SIDEWALKEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT20' UTILITYEASEMENT
LOT 24LOT 25LOT 30LOT 28LOT 29LOT 2LOT 23LOT 3LOT 1Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.04PreliminaryDevelopmentLandscapePlan NWPreliminary Development Landscape Plan NWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LEGENDSEE SHEET L1.05SEE SHEET L1.06
LOCKROY DR.
DORNELL CT.RETENTION POND W/FOUNTAIN, SEE SHEET L1.07SHIER RINGS RD.COSGRAY RD.R.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREELANDSCAPEDBUFFER MOUNDLANDSCAPEDBUFFER MOUNDTUMBLED STONE/BOULDER WALL, TYP.LANDSCAPED ENTRYFEATURE & SIGNAGEPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDGROUND COVERPROPOSEDEVERGREEN SHRUBSPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL GRASSESNOTES:ALL LOTS WILL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWINGMINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SECTION153.133:TYPE 1: LOTS UP TO 60' WIDE1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 2: LOTS 60' TO 91' WIDE1 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 3: LOTS 91' WIDE AND UP2 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 ANY SIZE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTUMBLED STONE/BOULDER WALL REFERENCE IMAGEORNAMENTAL GRASSES REFERENCE IMAGEPROP. R.O.W.
LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26LOT 10LOT 11LOT 9LOT 8LOT 28LOT 29LOT 27LOT 2LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 22LOT 3Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.05PreliminaryDevelopmentLandscapePlan SWPreliminary Development Landscape Plan SWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060SEE SHEET L1.04SEE SHEET L1.06
LOCKROY DR.DORNELL CT.R.O.W.PROPERTY LINECOSGRAY RD.LANDSCAPEDBUFFER MOUNDSLEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDGROUND COVERPROPOSEDEVERGREEN SHRUBSPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL GRASSESNOTES:ALL LOTS WILL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWINGMINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SECTION153.133:TYPE 1: LOTS UP TO 60' WIDE1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 2: LOTS 60' TO 91' WIDE1 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 3: LOTS 91' WIDE AND UP2 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 ANY SIZE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED
LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 10LOT 11LOT 19LOT 15LOT 17LOT 16LOT 22LOT 21LOT 20LOT 18Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.06PreliminaryDevelopmentLandscapePlan EastPreliminary Development Landscape Plan EastSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LEGENDPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREESEE SHEET L1.04LOCKROY DR.SEE SHEET L1.05DRUMMORE CT.RETENTION POND W/FOUNTAIN, SEE SHEET L1.07CLUSTERMAILBOXPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEEXISTINGEVERGREENTREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDGROUND COVERPROPOSEDEVERGREEN SHRUBSPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL GRASSESNOTES:ALL LOTS WILL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWINGMINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS SECTION153.133:TYPE 1: LOTS UP TO 60' WIDE1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 2: LOTS 60' TO 91' WIDE1 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 MEDIUM FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDEDTYPE 3: LOTS 91' WIDE AND UP2 LARGE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED1 ANY SIZE FRONT YARD TREE PROVIDED
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.07Pond SiteLayout PlansEntry Pond & Open Space Layout PlanSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"0102040LEGENDEast Pond Layout PlanSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"0102040Stone Boulder Planting Bed Reference ImageStone Boulder Wall w/ Plantings Reference ImageStone Boulder Landscaping Reference ImageRETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAINRETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAINR.O.W.PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDLANDSCAPEDHEADWALL, TYP.LOCKROY DR.DRUMMORE CT.Pond Fountain Reference ImageEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEPROPOSEDLANDSCAPEDHEADWALL, TYP.PROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREELOT 15LOT 30LOT 23LOT 1PROPOSEDGROUND COVERPROPOSEDEVERGREEN SHRUBSPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL GRASSESPROPOSEDGAZEBO ORSHADESTRUCTUREPROPOSEDWALKINGPATH WITHSEATINGPROPOSED NEIGHBORHOODCONNECTION TO SHARED USEPATHPROPOSEDWALKINGPATH WITHSEATING
LOT 24LOT 25LOT 30LOT 28LOT 29LOT 2LOT 23LOT 3LOT 1Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.08MaintenanceResponsibilityPlan NWMaintenance Responsibility Plan NWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LEGENDINDIVIDUALHOME OWNERMAINTENANCE AREAHOAMAINTENANCE AREACITYMAINTENANCE AREASEE SHEET L1.09SEE SHEET L1.10 SHIER RINGS RD.COSGRAY RD.
LOCKROY DR.
DORNELL CT.R.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.
PROPERTY LINE RETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAINEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREE
LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26LOT 10LOT 11LOT 9LOT 8LOT 28LOT 29LOT 27LOT 2LOT 4LOT 5LOT 6LOT 7LOT 22LOT 3Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.09MaintenanceResponsibilityPlan SWMaintenance Responsibility Plan SWSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LEGENDR.O.W.PROPERTY LINESEE SHEET L1.08SEE SHEET L1.10
COSGRAY RD.
LOCKROY DR.DORNELL CT.EXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEINDIVIDUALHOME OWNERMAINTENANCE AREAHOAMAINTENANCE AREACITYMAINTENANCE AREAPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREE
LOT 14LOT 13LOT 12LOT 10LOT 11LOT 19LOT 15LOT 17LOT 16LOT 22LOT 21LOT 20LOT 18Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL1.10MaintenanceResponsibilityPlan EastMaintenance Responsibility Plan EastSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LEGENDSEE SHEET L1.08LOCKROY DR.SEE SHEET L1.09DRUMMORE CT.RETENTION POND W/ FOUNTAINCLUSTERMAILBOXPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEEXISTINGEVERGREENTREEINDIVIDUALHOME OWNERMAINTENANCE AREAHOAMAINTENANCE AREACITYMAINTENANCE AREAPROPOSED LARGEDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSEDORNAMENTAL TREEPROPOSEDEVERGREEN TREEPROPOSED MEDIUMDECIDUOUS TREEPROPOSED SMALLDECIDUOUS TREE
10'17'15'18'-5"62'-7"10'21'-6"26'-10"34'-6"26'-4"20'Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date02/19/21ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL2.00ConceptualHomeDevelopmentPlanConceptual Home Development PlanSCALE: 1" = 50'-0"02550100LOCKROY DR.DORNELL CT.DRUMMORE CT.ZONING:RESIDENTIALZONING:
RESIDENTIALZONING:RESIDENTIALLOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4LOT 7LOT 8LOT 9LOT 10LOT 11LOT 12LOT 13LOT 14LOT 15LOT 16LOT 17LOT 18LOT 19LOT 20LOT 21LOT 22LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26LOT 27LOT 28LOT 29LOT 30RETENTION PONDW/ FOUNTAINRETENTION PONDW/ FOUNTAINSHIER RINGS RD.COSGRAY RD.EXISTING OVERHEADUTILITY LINESR.O.W.R.O.W.R.O.W.PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE R.O.W. R.O.W.PROPOSED STREETEXISTINGBIKEPATHPROPOSEDBIKEPATHEXTENSIONPOND SETBACKPOND SETBACKPOND SETBACK
PON
D
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
LEGENDEXISTINGDECIDUOUSTREEEXISTINGEVERGREENTREEINDIVIDUALHOME OWNER EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA (I.E.STRUCTURES, WALLS, HARDSCAPE &LANDSCAPE SCREENING)LOT 5LOT 6NOTE:HOUSE FOOTPRINTS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSESONLY. FINAL HOUSE CONFIGURATION/PLACEMENT SHALLBE DETERMINED BY DEVELOPER AND IN CONFORMANCEWITH THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT SET FORTHWITHIN THE PROJECT SUBMITTAL.INDIVIDUALHOME OWNER EXTERIOR GREEN SPACEAREA (I.E. TREES, SHRUBS, OTHERLANDSCAPINGEXISTING STREETPROPOSED TURN LANEAND WIDENED STREETPROPOSED R.O.W.LOT 23LOT 24LOT 25LOT 26LOT 27LOT 28LOT 29LOT 30Enlargement PlanSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"0153060LOTS 23-30 INCLUDE 10'SETBACK ENCROCHMENTSETBACK
10' ENCROACHMENT AREA
SETBACK
10' ENCROACHMENT AREA
Sheet #Sheet TitleRevisionsProject InfoProject #19053Date11/19/20ByGB/TFScaleAs NotedProject NamePrepared ForMC Shier Rings LLCP.O. Box 3001Dublin, OH 43016Columbus100 Northwoods Blvd, Ste AColumbus, Ohio 43235p 614.255.3399Cincinnati20 Village Square, Floor 3Cincinnati, Ohio 45246p614.360.3066PODdesign.netAyrshire FarmsDublin, OhioL3.00PreliminaryTree RemovalPlanPreliminary Tree Removal PlanSCALE: 1" = 60'-0"03060120NOTES FOR TREES REMOVED120 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVEDDUE TO THE POOR, DEAD, OR EXEMPT CONDITIONS.942 CALIPER INCHES OF TREES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVEDARE IN FAIR TO GOOD CONDITION.REPLACEMENT CALIPER SHALL MATCH INCH FOR CALIPERINCH FOR TREES REMOVED IN FAIR TO GOOD CONDITION.DUE TO THE ABOVE CONDITIONS, TOTALTREES TO BE REMOVED: 93CALCULATED REPLACEMENT TOTAL = COMBINED 1,062CALIPER -120 EXEMPT CALIPER = 942 CALIPER INCHESTOTAL TREES RE4UIRED FOR REPLACEMENT:942** CALIPER INCHES/2.5 CALIPER INCHES = 377 TREES**515 OF 942 ARE FLOWERING PEAREXISTING TREETO BE REMOVEDEXISTING TREEPLANT KEYTREE PROTECTIONCONDITIONSTATUSEXCELLENT(A) PRESERVEGOODFAIRPOOR(B) REMOVEDEADEXISTING TREE CONDITION AND STAUS KEYTREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT NOTES1.ALL TREES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA NOT SPECIFICALLYDESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PRESERVED. ALL TREEREMOVAL, RELOCATION, AND PRESERVATION WORK SHALL BESUPERVISED WITH THE INPUT OF A CERTIFIED ARBORIST.2.FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREES TO BEPRESERVED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION.THE FENCING MUST REMAIN IN PLACE DURING ALL PHASES OFCONSTRUCTION. ANY CHANGES IN THE PROTECTIVE FENCINGMUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR. OWNERSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION,AND MAINTENANCE OF PROTECTION FENCING, REFER TOTREE PRESERVATION DETAIL.3.PRESERVED TREES REMAINING ARE TO BE FERTILIZED ANDPRUNED (IF NEEDED) TWO YEARS AFTER CONSTRUCTION.4.OWNER SHALL MONITOR HEALTH AND VIGOR OF EXISTINGTREES THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OFTHIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY A CERTIFIEDARBORIST IS ANY DECLINE IN HEALTHY TREES IS APPARENT. THEARBORIST SHALL DETERMINE THE REMEDIAL ACTION, IF ANY, TOBE TAKEN.5.ALL EXISTING TREES NOTED AS FAIR TO POOR HEALTH SHALL BEFERTILIZED YEARLY IN THE SPRING USING A HORTICULTURALLYAPPROVED METHOD FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS. AFTERTHREE YEARS, THE HEALTH SHOULD BE EVALUATED BY ACERTIFIED ARBORIST AND CONTINUING MAINTENANCERECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE MADE.6.ANY TREES REMOVED OR DAMAGED IN TREE PRESERVATIONAREAS WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED PER CODE.7.FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THESE TERMS OR THE TREEPRESERVATION, REMOVAL, AND REPLACEMENT PLAN SHALL BEUNLAWFUL.EVALUATION OF EXISTING TREES* MULTI-STEM TREE7625ID #SpeciesCommon NameSizeConditionStatus7625Crataegus specieshawthorn15FairB7626Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB7627Juglans nigrablack walnut20GoodB7628Juglans nigrablack walnut15FairB7629Juglans nigrablack walnut18GoodB7630Juglans nigrablack walnut20FairB7631Juglans nigrablack walnut19GoodB7632Juglans nigrablack walnut14GoodB7633Juglans nigrablack walnut13GoodB7634Juglans nigrablack walnut15GoodB7635Malus speciescrabapple20FairA7636Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear21FairA7637Malus speciescrabapple18PoorA7638Malus speciescrabapple10PoorA7639Morus speciesmulberry16FairA7640Juglans nigrablack walnut8ExcellentA7641Juglans nigrablack walnut9GoodA7642Picea abiesNorway spruce16GoodA7643Pinus strobuswhite pine17GoodA7644Picea abiesNorway spruce11GoodA7645Picea abiesNorway spruce9GoodB7646Juglans nigrablack walnut8ExcellentA7647Juglans nigrablack walnut12GoodA7648Juglans nigrablack walnut11GoodA7649Prunus serotinablack cherry9GoodA7650Prunus serotinablack cherry8FairA7651Prunus serotinablack cherry27FairA*7652Prunus serotinablack cherry7PoorA7653Acer saccharinumsilver maple85FairA*7654Acer negundoboxelder6FairA7655Prunus serotinablack cherry15Very PoorA7656Juglans nigrablack walnut6FairA7657Prunus serotinablack cherry11FairA7658Juglans nigrablack walnut6FairA7659Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7660Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear12FairB*7661Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear14FairB*7662Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7663Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7664Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7665Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8FairB*7666Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear6FairB*7667Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB*7668Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB*7669Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear13FairB*7670Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7671Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear18FairB*7672Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear16FairB*7673Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7674Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7675Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7676Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7677Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7678Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8FairB*7679Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7680Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear12PoorB*7681Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7682Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear12FairB*7683Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7684Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7685Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7686Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7687Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7688Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear6FairB7689Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7690Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear13FairB*7691Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear18FairB*7692Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7693Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7694Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear12FairB*7695Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear11FairB*7696Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8FairB*7697Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB*7698Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7699Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8FairB*7700Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear9FairB*7701Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7702Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB*7703Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8FairB*7704Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB*7705Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairB*7706Celtis occidentalishackberry8PoorB7707Juglans nigrablack walnut7GoodA7708Acer saccharinumsilver maple16FairA7709Juglans nigrablack walnut6FairA7710Acer saccharumsugar maple16FairA7711Fraxinus americanawhite ash26DeadB7712Quercus palustrispin oak12GoodB7713Juglans nigrablack walnut6FairB7714Acer saccharinumsilver maple6GoodA7715Acer saccharinumsilver maple6GoodA7716Acer saccharinumsilver maple6GoodA7717Acer saccharinumsilver maple16FairB*7718Acer saccharinumsilver maple17FairB*7719Acer saccharinumsilver maple8PoorB7720Morus speciesmulberry8FairB7721Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear14FairB7722Morus speciesmulberry15FairB*7723Morus speciesmulberry17FairB*7724Acer saccharinumsilver maple8PoorB7725Acer saccharinumsilver maple13FairB7726Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear12PoorB7727Morus speciesmulberry7FairB7728Morus speciesmulberry6PoorB7729Morus speciesmulberry14FairB7730Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear18FairB7731Morus speciesmulberry17FairB7732Acer saccharinumsilver maple32PoorB*7733Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear14FairB7734Morus speciesmulberry6GoodB7735Juglans nigrablack walnut6ExcellentB7736Morus speciesmulberry8FairB7737Malus speciescrabapple6FairB7738Acer saccharinumsilver maple14FairB7739Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear8PoorB7740Juglans nigrablack walnut8GoodB7741Morus speciesmulberry17FairB*7742Malus speciescrabapple10FairB*7743Morus speciesmulberry8GoodB7744Prunus serotinablack cherry7FairB7745Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear6FairB7746Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear10FairB7747Prunus serotinablack cherry43Very PoorA*7748Prunus serotinablack cherry15PoorA7749Prunus serotinablack cherry9FairA7750Prunus serotinablack cherry12FairA7751Celtis occidentalishackberry8GoodA7752Celtis occidentalishackberry8FairA7753Celtis occidentalishackberry8FairA7754Celtis occidentalishackberry9GoodA7755Celtis occidentalishackberry8GoodA7756Celtis occidentalishackberry7FairA7757Celtis occidentalishackberry40FairA*7758Acer saccharinumsilver maple17FairA7759Celtis occidentalishackberry16FairA7760Celtis occidentalishackberry18PoorA7761Prunus serotinablack cherry12GoodA7762Acer saccharinumsilver maple8DeadA7763Acer saccharinumsilver maple37FairA7764Acer saccharinumsilver maple31FairA7765Prunus serotinablack cherry8Very PoorA7766Acer saccharumsugar maple10GoodA7767Prunus serotinablack cherry6GoodA7768Pyrus calleryanaflowering pear7FairA7769Celtis occidentalishackberry7FairA7770Celtis occidentalishackberry36PoorA*7771Celtis occidentalishackberry7Very PoorA7772Celtis occidentalishackberry7PoorA7773Fraxinus americanawhite ash9Very PoorA7774Prunus serotinablack cherry9GoodA7775Ulmus americanaAmerican elm16FairA7776Acer saccharinumsilver maple38PoorA7777Prunus serotinablack cherry6GoodA7778Celtis occidentalishackberry35FairA7779Acer saccharinumsilver maple11FairA7780Juglans nigrablack walnut7GoodA7781Ulmus americanaAmerican elm15Very PoorA7782Ulmus americanaAmerican elm8PoorA7783Acer saccharinumsilver maple24Very PoorA7784Acer saccharinumsilver maple9PoorA776877067707770977087710771177127713771477157716771777187719772077217722772377247725772677277728772977317732773077337734773577367737773877397740774277417743774477457746764276437644764576267627762876297630763176327633763476357636763776687667763876697639764077057704770376667702770177007699766476657670769876977696769576947693769276887689769076917672767176847680768776867685768176827683766376617662767376747660765976787677767976767675764176467647764876497650765176547656765276587653765576657783778177847782778077777778777977747775777677707772777377697771776777667765776477637762775877577761776077597749774877477756775577547750775377527751
DORNELL CT LOCKROY DRDRUMMORE CT
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
29
1
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1820
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1810
PID: 274-000660-0
0
SR ASSOCIATES
61.98 ACRES
PID: 272-000233-
0
0
HUFFMAN JASON
R
0.89 ACRES
PID: 272-000292-0
0
MOORE IMA
1.05 ACRES
PID: 272-000291-
0
0
BROGAN BEATRI
C
E
L
1.18 ACRES PID: 272-000374RAMSEY MICHAEL E0.71 ACRESPID: 274-001297-0
0
PORTER KENNET
H
E
0.49 ACRES
PID: 274-001298-0
0
SMITH KYLE K
0.32 ACRES
PID: 274-001299-0
0
PLACE TRACY J
0.38 ACRES
PID: 274-001300
REAGER ANDREW
T
0.33 ACRES
PID: 274-001301-
0
0
DATTANT JATIN
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001302
SALCONE MICHA
E
L
A
J
R
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001303-0
0
STUDRAWA CYN
T
H
I
A
M
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001304-
0
0
BLACK JOSEPH E
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001305-0
0
SHAMSUDDIN AB
D
U
L
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001153-0
0
KEEL ADAM D
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001154-
0
0
D SILVA JOYCE V
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001155-0
0
BOFF JEFFERY
0.34 ACRESPID: 272-000372-00HARTMAN ARTHUR RAYMOND TR0.96 ACRESPID: 272-000373-00STICKEY CHARLOTTE L0.71 ACRES940940
941942942 940940
9
4
0
941
942941942 9
4
1
940 940939
938940
939941
942
941
940
943
942
9439
4
2941941 940
940939
PROPOSED WET
B
A
S
I
N
NORMAL POOL: 938.00
TOP OF BANK: 941.00
PROPOSED WET BASIN
NORMAL POOL: 936.00
TOP OF BANK: 940.00
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 2' SIDEWALK
EASEMENT(TYP)
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 2'
SW ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 2' SW &
WAT ESMT
PROP 2' SW
& WAT ESMT
EXISTING 48.5'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
PROP 2' SW
& WAT ESMTPROP 2'
SW ESMT
PROP 2'
SW ESMT0+001+002
+
0
0
4+00 0+001+002+003+004+004+4
1
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00945945941942942943943944944930
928929
935932933934 936 937
940
938
939
941
942943944
940
941
941
941
942
942
943
943
942943944942943944942943944945943944943944945943
940940
938 939
936 937
930
935
926927928929
931932933934
9
4
0 9389
3
9
9
4
1
9
4
1
9
4
1941
942
942
943
943
942942943943
943
944
944
942
943
9439
4
3
944944942942943943942942943943941942942941942942943
94
3
944
94
4
942
942
942
943
943
944
944
941
942
942 942
943
942 943941942
940
9419429429429429429429419429419
4
1
9429439439439439449449449449429439439439439449449419
4
2
942942942943943943943944944942
943
942
942
943
943
944
944
942
942
943
943
943
942
942
943
943 942
942
943
943
944
944 942
942
943
943
942
942
942
943
943
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
FGE=943.00
FGE=944.00
FGE=944.00
FGE=943.50
FGE=943.50
FGE=944.50
FGE=944.50
FGE=944.50
FGE=942.50
FGE=942.50
FGE=943.00
FGE=943.50
FGE=944.00
FGE=944.50
FGE=943.50 FGE=943.00
FGE=944.00
FGE=944.00
FGE=943.50
FGE=944.00
FGE=943.50
FGE=943.50
FGE=943.51
FGE=944.00
FGE=943.10
FGE=943.00
FGE=943.00
FGE=943.00
FGE=942.00
FGE=941.75
15"
15"
18"
18"
18"12"15"15"
15"
12"
12"15"15"18"
18"24"24"24"
24"12"12"
12"
12"
12"
15"
15"
18"
18"
24"24"24"12"15"12"
12"
12"
12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"18"12"12"
21"24"24"12"4
34
17
42
7
15
41
40
39
38
14
62
61
60
59
56
30
29
27
26
63
67
66
65
22
21
16
13
23
24
19
20
37
36
6
10
11
8
9
52
53
50
51
48
49
46
47
44
45
43
32
18
69
3
31
5
64
55
25
12
35
2
1
33
941
942
943
943
942
943
943
940
941
942
926927935940940936937938939939930935927927928929931932933934942
942
943
943
942
942
943
943
928929
941941941
941
942
943
944
941941941942942942942943943943943944944943
944
943
944
SHIER RINGS ROA
D
(PUBLIC - EX 50' W
I
D
E
)COSGRAY ROAD(PUBLIC - 80' WIDE)80' R/W 50' EX R/W74' PROP R/WPROP BERM
ELE: 942.2594094094094094094
0
940 9409409409
4
0
940
941941941941941941941941941941941941
941
941
941941941941
94
2 942942942
9
4
2942942942942 9409409
4
0 940940940940940 93893
8
939939
939939939939
939939
939
9399419
4
1
941
941
9
4
1
9
4
1
941
941941941 941941941
942
94
2
942942 94294294294294294294
2942 942
94
2
9429
4
2
942 942942942
9429
4
2942942942
943943 943943943943943943
9439439439439
4
4944
944944944944INV: 937.00 +/-
940
938
939
941
CONNECTION TO
EXISTING STORM
TC: 937.76 +/-
INV: 935.46 +/-
MATCH EXISTING
ELE: 938.25 +/-
68
21"
PROP 20'
UTIL ESMT
INV: 939.50
INV: 939.00
INV: 938.50
INV: 939.50
INV: 939.00
INV: 938.50
INV: 937.25
CONNECTION TO
EXISTING SANITARY
TC: 938.11 +/-
INV: 928.11 +/-
TC: 941.25 +/-
INV: 933.50 +/-
INV: 939.50
INV: 938.00
NO GRADING UNTIL
ESMT IS VACATED
18"
22A
JOB NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:REVISIONSDATESHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONAPPROVEDPRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANFORAYRSHIRE FARMSCITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCHECKED BY:
01/12/2021
JRP
BJM
2019.01745DATE
PLOT SCALE: 1:1 EDIT DATE: 1/11/21 - 8:45 AM EDITED BY: IDIN DRAWING FILE: O:\2019\01745\D. DRAWINGS\CIVIL\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN\2019.01745.CE.GP.DWG2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Ste 300 | Columbus, Ohio 43231TEL 614.901.2235 | FAX 614.901.2236www.structurepoint.comGRADING PLANC100
0 8040HORZ 1"=40'
XXX
XXX
GRADING LEGEND
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
PROPOSED BASIN TOP OF BANK
MAJOR FLOOD ROUTING ARROW
MAJOR FLOOD ROUTING ARROW
(THROUGH CLOSED STORM SEWER)
XXX
XXX
XXX.XX FGE
NOTE:
TOP OF CASTING INFORMATION SHOWN
ON SHEET C101
ASSUME INVERTS OF INLETS TO THE
BASINS ARE EQUAL TO THE NORMAL POOL
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
NO STRUCTURES ARE TO BE PLACED
WITHIN 6 FEET OF ANY DRIVEWAY FLARE
935
940
950
935
940
950
-0+25 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+25GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+07.09ELEV = 941.18GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+55.61ELEV = 942.04GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+20.88ELEV = 940.80GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+81.25ELEV = 942.01GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+37.69ELEV = 941.45GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+99.65ELEV = 942.69GRADE BREAKSTA = 4+70.29ELEV = 943.152.00%2.00%
1.00%2.00%1.00%1.00%GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+07.09ELEV = 941.18GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+55.61ELEV = 942.04GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+20.88ELEV = 940.80GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+81.25ELEV = 942.01GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+37.69ELEV = 941.45GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+99.65ELEV = 942.69GRADE BREAKSTA = 4+70.29ELEV = 943.15935
940
950
935
940
950
-0+25 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+25GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+00ELEV = 940.78GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+60.86ELEV = 941.70GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+21.71ELEV = 941.09GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+15.43ELEV = 942.49GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+93.81ELEV = 941.71GRADE BREAKSTA = 3+55.63ELEV = 942.95GRADE BREAKSTA = 4+17.45ELEV = 942.33GRADE BREAKSTA = 4+72.56ELEV = 943.151.50%1.00%1.50%
2.00%1.00%1.50%
1.50%
935
940
950
935
940
950
-0+25 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 5+25GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+00ELEV = 943.15GRADE BREAKSTA = 0+39.37ELEV = 942.37GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+19.36ELEV = 943.17GRADE BREAKSTA = 1+99.35ELEV = 941.97GRADE BREAKSTA = 2+61.35ELEV = 942.59GRADE BREAKSTA = 3+23.35ELEV = 941.66GRADE BREAKSTA = 3+86.77ELEV = 942.29GRADE BREAKSTA = 4+40.83ELEV = 941.502.00%1.00%1.50%1.00%1.50%1.00%1.50%
STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE
STR.
NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22A
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33
STRUCTURE TYPE
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
TC
938.84
938.99
939.42
940.16
-5.09
940.78
941.09
940.25
940.20
940.78
940.78
-7.37
940.49
940.80
941.45
942.45
942.07
940.49
941.14
941.14
941.39
0.00
940.65
941.76
941.76
-8.13
941.63
941.32
941.10
942.00
-4.53
940.94
942.26
STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE
STR.
NO
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
55
56
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
STRUCTURE TYPE
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
48 MANHOLE
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
CATCH BASIN 3 (CB-2.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
CATCH BASIN 2-2A (CB-1.1)
48 MANHOLE
HEADWALL HW-2.2_CIRC
TC
936.76
-9.55
940.61
940.90
941.66
941.97
942.37
942.33
941.71
940.66
941.34
941.35
941.65
941.66
942.05
942.06
942.02
942.02
941.40
941.40
-7.24
940.51
940.96
941.27
941.27
941.27
942.50
-6.68
937.50
937.90
939.78
940.37
-3.79
JOB NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:REVISIONSDATESHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONAPPROVEDPRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANFORAYRSHIRE FARMSCITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCHECKED BY:
01/12/2021
JRP
BJM
2019.01745DATE
PLOT SCALE: 1:1 EDIT DATE: 1/11/21 - 12:37 PM EDITED BY: IDIN DRAWING FILE: O:\2019\01745\D. DRAWINGS\CIVIL\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN\2019.01745.CE.GP.DWG2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Ste 300 | Columbus, Ohio 43231TEL 614.901.2235 | FAX 614.901.2236www.structurepoint.comROAD PROFILES &TYPICAL SECTIONC101
0 8040
0 105VERT 1"=5'
HORZ 1"=40'
LOCKROY DR ROAD PROFILE
SCALE: HORIZ 1"=40', VERT 1"=5'
DORNELL CT ROAD PROFILE
SCALE: HORIZ 1"=40', VERT 1"=5'
DRUMMORE CT ROAD PROFILE
SCALE: HORIZ 1"=40', VERT 1"=5'
PROPOSED
8" SANITARY
25'
4' WALK
(RD-05)8' TREE LAWN2'12'4' WALK
(RD-05)8' TREE LAWN 2'12'
PROPOSED
STORM SEWER
2' SIDEWALK &
WATERLINE ESMT
PROPOSED
8" WATER MAIN
25'
3:1 MAX.
3/16" PER FOOT 3/16" PER FOOT3/16" PER FOOT3/16" PER FOOT
PROFILE
GRADE ℄
2'
2' SIDEWALK ESMT
3:1 MAX.
PROPOSED
FIRE HYDRANT
(WA-01)
TYPICAL 28' B/B PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION
PER DUBLIN STANDARD DRAWING RD-01
NOT TO SCALE
COMBINATION
CURB & GUTTER
PER RD-02
14'3.5'4.5'
10' (TYP)
20' UTILITY ESMT
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1820
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1810
PID: 274-000660-0
0
SR ASSOCIATES
61.98 ACRES
PID: 272-000233-0
0
HUFFMAN JASON
R
0.89 ACRES
PID: 272-000292-0
0
MOORE IMA
1.05 ACRES
PID: 272-000291-0
0
BROGAN BEATRI
C
E
L
1.18 ACRES PID: 272-000374RAMSEY MICHAEL E0.71 ACRESPID: 274-001297-0
0
PORTER KENNET
H
E
0.49 ACRES
PID: 274-001298-0
0
SMITH KYLE K
0.32 ACRES
PID: 274-001299-0
0
PLACE TRACY J
0.38 ACRES
PID: 274-001300
REAGER ANDREW
T
0.33 ACRES
PID: 274-001301-
0
0
DATTANT JATIN
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001302
SALCONE MICHA
E
L
A
J
R
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001303-0
0
STUDRAWA CYN
T
H
I
A
M
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001304-0
0
BLACK JOSEPH E
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001305-0
0
SHAMSUDDIN AB
D
U
L
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001153-0
0
KEEL ADAM D
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001154-0
0
D SILVA JOYCE V
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001155-0
0
BOFF JEFFERY
0.34 ACRESPID: 272-000372-00HARTMAN ARTHUR RAYMOND TR0.96 ACRESPID: 272-000373-00STICKEY CHARLOTTE L0.71 ACRES2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
29
1
50.7'50.57'10'20'
15'10'PROP 20' UTILITY
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
PROP 2' SIDEWA
L
K
EASEMENT(TYP)
20'
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENTPROP 2' SIDEWALKEASEMENTPROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
20'PROP 20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 2'
SIDEWALK &
WATER LINE
EASEMENT
PROP 2' SIDEWAL
K
&
WATER LINE EASE
M
E
N
T
PROP BASIN
PROP BASIN
PROP 20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
EXISTING 48.5'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP
WATER
SERVICE
LINE (TYP)
PROP SANITARY
SERVICE
LINE (TYP)
DORNELL CT
(PUBLIC-50' WIDE)LOCKROY DR(PUBLIC-50' WIDE)DRUMMORE CT
(PUBLIC- 50' WIDE)
SHIER RINGS ROA
D
COSGRAY ROADPROP WATER LINE (
T
Y
P
)
CONNECTION TO EX
SANITARY MAIN
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
EX 15" STM
EX 15" STM
EX 15" STM
EX 15" STM
EX 18" STMEX 12" STM
EX 8" SANCONNECTION TO
EX STORM
CONNECTION TO EX
SANITARY MAIN
EX 16" WATER MAINEX 16" WATER MAIN
BASIN OUTLET TO S
H
I
E
R
RINGS STORM SEW
E
RPROP CULVERT
FOR EX DITCH
20'
15" STM
15" STM
18" STM
18" STM
18" S
T
M12" STM15" STM15" STM
15" S
T
M
12" STM
12" STM
15" STM15" STM18" STM
18" STM24" STM24" STM24" STM
24" STM
12" STM12"12"
12"12"
15" STM
15" STM
18" STM
18" STM
24" STM
24" STM24" STM12" STM15" STM12"12"
12" STM 12" STM
12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12"12" STM12" STM18" STM12"12"
STM
21" STM
* LOT 18
(SEE NOTE
SHEET C300)
20'
10' TREE PRESE
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
Z
O
N
E
20'10' LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
10' LANDSCAPE
BUFFER
PROP 16" WAT
E
R
M
A
I
N
E
X
T
E
N
S
I
O
N
PROP 8"
WATERLINE
PROP 8"
WATERLINE
PROP 8"
WATERLINE1+002
+
0
0
3+00
4+00 0+001+002+003+004+001+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROPOSED
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
PROPOSED
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT24" STM24" STMPROP 20' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROP LANDSCAP
E
EASEMENT
PROP LANDSCAP
E
EASEMENT
8" SAN8" SAN
8" SA
N
8" SAN
8" SAN
8" SAN
8" SAN
8" SAN8" SAN8" SAN18" STM
JOB NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:REVISIONSDATESHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONAPPROVEDPRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANFORAYRSHIRE FARMSCITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCHECKED BY:
01/12/2021
JRP
BJM
2019.01745DATE
PLOT SCALE: 1:1 EDIT DATE: 1/11/21 - 8:18 AM EDITED BY: IDIN DRAWING FILE: O:\2019\01745\D. DRAWINGS\CIVIL\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN\2019.01745.CE.UP.DWG2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Ste 300 | Columbus, Ohio 43231TEL 614.901.2235 | FAX 614.901.2236www.structurepoint.comUTILITY PLANC200
UTILITY LEGEND
SANITARY GRAVITY
SANITARY SERVICE
WATER
WATER SERVICE
STORM SEWER
CATCH BASIN
HEADWALL
SANITARY MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
STM
0 8040HORZ 1"=40'
11'11'11'125'50'17.76'336.82'
PROP. REALIGNED
DRAINAGE DITCH
24.24'24.24'11'11'11'80'276.16'
SIGHT TRIANGLE
(LEFT TURN)
SIGHT TRIANGLE
(RIGHT TURN)
4
3
2
1
68
18" STM21" STM 24" STM24" STMPROPOSED WET BASIN 1
NORMAL POOL: 938.00
TOP OF BANK: 941.00
PROP 20' UTIL
ESMT
PROP LANDSCAPE
ESMT
PROP LANDSCAPE
ESMT
SHIER RINGS ROAD
(PUBLIC - EX 50' WIDE)LOCKROY DR(PUBLIC - 50' WIDE)50' R/W
28' B/B
PROP BIKE PATH
EXTENSION 8'PROP 16" WATERLINE
EXTENSION
EX OVERHEAD ELEC
PROP 2' SIDEWALK &
WATERLINE EASEMENT
PROP 2' SIDEWALK
EASEMENT
PID: 272-000233-00
HUFFMAN JASON R
0.89 ACRES
PID: 274-000660-00
SR ASSOCIATES
61.98 ACRES
SHIER RINGS
ROAD CL
INV: 937.00 +/-
JOB NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:REVISIONSDATESHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONAPPROVEDPRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANFORAYRSHIRE FARMSCITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCHECKED BY:
01/12/2021
JRP
BJM
2019.01745DATE
PLOT SCALE: 1:1 EDIT DATE: 1/11/21 - 8:22 AM EDITED BY: IDIN DRAWING FILE: O:\2019\01745\D. DRAWINGS\CIVIL\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN\2019.01745.CE.TURN LANE.DWG2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Ste 300 | Columbus, Ohio 43231TEL 614.901.2235 | FAX 614.901.2236www.structurepoint.comTURN LANE SCHEMATICC400
0 6030HORZ 1"=30'
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
CURB AND GUTTER
LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS)
PROPOSED WATERLINE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE No.
SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE
PER POLICY 08-013
STM
CO
DORNELL CT LOCKROY DRDRUMMORE CT
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
29
1
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1820
DUBLIN
SUB-BASIN 1810
PID: 274-000660-0
0
SR ASSOCIATES
61.98 ACRES
PID: 272-000233-
0
0
HUFFMAN JASON
R
0.89 ACRES
PID: 272-000292-0
0
MOORE IMA
1.05 ACRES
PID: 272-000291-
0
0
BROGAN BEATRI
C
E
L
1.18 ACRES PID: 272-000374RAMSEY MICHAEL E0.71 ACRESPID: 274-001297-0
0
PORTER KENNET
H
E
0.49 ACRES
PID: 274-001298-0
0
SMITH KYLE K
0.32 ACRES
PID: 274-001299-0
0
PLACE TRACY J
0.38 ACRES
PID: 274-001300
REAGER ANDREW
T
0.33 ACRES
PID: 274-001301-
0
0
DATTANT JATIN
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001302
SALCONE MICHA
E
L
A
J
R
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001303-0
0
STUDRAWA CYN
T
H
I
A
M
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001304-
0
0
BLACK JOSEPH E
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001305-0
0
SHAMSUDDIN AB
D
U
L
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001153-0
0
KEEL ADAM D
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001154-
0
0
D SILVA JOYCE V
0.31 ACRES
PID: 274-001155-0
0
BOFF JEFFERY
0.34 ACRESPID: 272-000372-00HARTMAN ARTHUR RAYMOND TR0.96 ACRESPID: 272-000373-00STICKEY CHARLOTTE L0.71 ACRES0+001+002
+
0
0
3+00
4+00 0+001+002+004+004+4
1
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
SHIER RINGS ROA
D
(PUBLIC - EX 50' W
I
D
E
)COSGRAY ROAD(PUBLIC - 80' WIDE)80' R/W 50' EX R/W74' PROP R/WE-ONE HP95 Mid MountE-ONE HP95 Mid Mount
TIRE PATH (TYP)
CAB PATH (TYP)
47.75
7.917 18.417 4.833
E-ONE HP95 Mid Mount
Overall Length 47.750ft
Overall Width 8.333ft
Overall Body Height 11.000ft
Min Body Ground Clearance 1.393ft
Track Width 8.333ft
Lock-to-lock time 6.00s
Max Wheel Angle 45.00°
JOB NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:REVISIONSDATESHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONAPPROVEDPRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANFORAYRSHIRE FARMSCITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIOCHECKED BY:
01/12/2021
JRP
BJM
2019.01745DATE
PLOT SCALE: 1:1 EDIT DATE: 1/11/21 - 8:23 AM EDITED BY: IDIN DRAWING FILE: O:\2019\01745\D. DRAWINGS\CIVIL\CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS\PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN\2019.01745.CE.AUTOTURN.DWG2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Ste 300 | Columbus, Ohio 43231TEL 614.901.2235 | FAX 614.901.2236www.structurepoint.comAUTOTURN EXHIBITC500
0 8040HORZ 1"=40'
PLANNING 5200 Emerald Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 phone 614.410.4600 dublinohiousa.gov
RECORD OF ACTION
Planning & Zoning Commission
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
2. Ayrshire Farms PID: 272-000166
20-092Z-PDP Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan
Proposal: Rezoning of ±11.37 acres from a Rural District to a Planned Unit
Development District with a Preliminary Development Plan to develop 30
single-family lots.
Location: Southeast of the intersection of Shier Rings Road and Cosgray Road.
Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for Rezoning and
a Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code
Section 153.050.
Applicant: Todd Foley, POD Design
Planning Contact: Zach Hounshell, Planner I
Contact Information: 614.410.4652, zhounshell@dublin.oh.us
Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/20-092
MOTION: Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Fishman seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan without significant revision.
VOTE: 7 – 0.
RESULT: The Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan were recommended for approval and
forwarded to City Council with ten conditions:
1) That the applicant continues to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to determine
acceptable street names and updates the plans with the approved street names , prior to City
Council submittal;
2) That the applicant continues to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management
compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances;
3) That the applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right -of-way needs to accommodate the
Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn l ane as well as to identify the
appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way, prior to City Council submittal;
4) That the applicant work with Staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree survey , prior to the Final
Development Plan submittal;
5) That the applicant continues to work with Staff to determine the appropriate number of
replacement trees to be located within the landscape buffer;
Page 1 of 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AE64110-F73C-4DA9-A246-E469F1B0D002
PLANNING 5200 Emerald Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 phone 614.410.4600 dublinohiousa.gov
2. Ayrshire Farms PID: 272-000166
20-092Z-PDP Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan
6) That the applicant revises the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard setback for Lots 1
through 5 to reflect what is shown on the development plan;
7) That the applicant maintain lot 18 until the lot is sold for development;
8) That the applicant provide open space amenities in accordance to the Commission comments with
the final development plan;
9) That the text be revised to eliminate asphalt drives; and
10) That the applicant change the fencing height from 6 feet to 4 feet and provide a consistent fence
detail with the Final Development Plan.
RECORDED VOTES:
Jane Fox Yes
Warren Fishman Yes
Kristina Kennedy Yes
Mark Supelak Yes
Rebecca Call Yes
Leo Grimes Yes
Lance Schneier Yes
STAFF CERTIFICATION
_____________________________________
Zach Hounshell, Planner I
Page 2 of 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 3AE64110-F73C-4DA9-A246-E469F1B0D002
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 2 of 16
Ms. Call indicated that Case 1 would be moved to the regular agenda for discussion.
CASES
1. Greco Law – Sign, 4945 Bradenton Avenue, 20-185AFDP, Amended Final Development
Plan
A request for the installation of a 15-square-foot ground sign for an existing office building. The site is south
of Bradenton Avenue, ±400 feet southwest of the intersection with Frantz Road and is zoned as a Planned
Unit Development.
Case Presentation
No presentation was given.
Commission Questions
Mr. Fishman stated that this development is a Planned Unit Development. Does the proposed sign meet Code
and is internal lighting permitted?
Ms. Husak responded that there are no limitations on the type of lighting permitted; internal illumination is
permitted. The proposed sign does meet Code requirements.
There were no additional questions.
Public Comment
Ms Husak stated that no public comments were received on any of the cases tonight.
Mr. Grimes moved, Mr. Fishman seconded approval of the Amended Final Development Plan with the following
three conditions:
1) The applicant continue to work with staff to finalize landscape details prior to submitting for a
permanent sign permit through Building Standards;
2) The applicant provide a masonry base for the sign, subject to staff approval;
3) The applicant apply for, and obtain approval of, a permanent sign permit through Building Standards
prior to installation of the ground sign.
Vote: Mr. Grimes, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Mr. Schneier, yes;
Ms. Kennedy, yes.
NEW CASES
Ms. Call indicated that Cases 2 and 3 would be heard together.
2. Ayrshire Farms, PID: 272-000166, 20-092Z/PDP, Rezoning and Preliminary Development
Plan
3. Ayrshire Farms, PID: 272-000166, 20-093PP, Preliminary Plat
A request for review and a recommendation of approval to City Council for a rezoning of ±11.37 acres from
a Rural District to a Planned Unit Development District to develop 30 single-family lots and consideration of
an accompanying preliminary plat. The site is located southeast of the intersection of Shier Rings Road and
Cosgray Road.
Case Presentation
Mr. Hounshell stated that these two applications relate to the proposed development of Ayrshire Farms. The
request is for review and a recommendation of approval for a Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan and
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 3 of 16
Preliminary Plat to rezone approximately 11.37 acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development
District, for the development of 30 single-family homes, dedicated open space, and the dedication of three
public streets. The site was annexed into the City of Dublin on March 11, 2020 (Ordinance 02-20) and upon
annexation, was automatically zoned R, Rural District. In September 2020, the Planning and Zoning
Commission provided an Informal Review of the proposed future development of 34 single-family homes.
Commission members expressed concerns regarding the lack of usable open space located on the site and
recommended that the density of the development be decreased by eliminating some lots. Commissioners
also supported the variation in lot sizes across the developmen t. The site contains three lots. The westernmost
lot is being farmed and contains no natural features except for rows of trees along the southern and eastern
boundaries. The two lots on the eastern portion of the site are comprised of the rear portion of two rural,
residential parcels, which are not entirely annexed into the City. This application will combine all three lots for
the 30-unit residential development. The Community Plan designates this area as Mixed Residential, Low
Density. This designation allows for 2-3 dwelling units per acre and is intended to permit a mix of housing
options as a transition from adjacent single-family residential. The Ballantrae single-family development is
located to the south. North of Shier Rings Road, the developed area transitions into the West Innovation
District. This site does provide a transition between traditional, single family housing and more compact,
industrial developments. Currently, this site is being used for stormwater management.
Revised Proposal
The applicant is proposing 30 single-family lots, three public streets, and approximately 2.62 acres of public
open space on the approximately 11.37-acre site. Since the Informal Review in September, the applicant has
decreased the number of lots from 34 lots, which reduced the density to approximately 2.63 dwellings per
acre and increased the amount of public open space.
Open Spaces
The proposal includes three reserves of open space (Reserves A-C), which total 2.62 acres. Reserve A is
approximately 1.48 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the development. Reserve A includes a
retention pond maintained by the City of Dublin, multi-use paths, an entry feature, landscaping, and active
use amenities such as a gazebo or shelter. Reserve B is approximately 0.28 acre and is located east of the
entry drive into the development, and includes only an entry feature and landscaping. Reserve C is
approximately 0.86 acre and is located at the southeast corner of the development. Reserve C includes a
retention pond maintained by the City of Dublin, as well as benches, landscaping, and open space for passive
use of the area. Excluding the retention ponds, the open space area will be maintained by the homeowner
association. A landscape buffer also will be provided along Cosgray Road, which will replicate that along the
Ballantrae frontage on Cosgray Road.
Setbacks
Two types of setbacks are proposed. The first are perimeter setbacks. 45-foot setbacks will be provided on
the north and west sides of the development (Shier Rings and Cosgray Roads), and 20-foot setbacks will be
provided on the south and east sides of the development (Ballantrae development). The second type are the
lot setbacks, which are specific to each lot. Front yard setbacks will be 20 feet; Side Yard Setbacks: Lots 1-
15 - 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum 14-foot separation between structures, and Lots 16-30 - 6-foot
minimum per side with a minimum 16-foot separation between structures. Rear Yard Setbacks: Lots 1-5 - 45
feet; Lots 6-22 - 30 feet; Lots 23-30 - 20 feet (Patios may encroach 10 feet into rear setback). Lot 18 of the
development has a 48.5-foot easement to the rear of the lot that is in place for existing utilities that operate
for the lot north of the site. The applicant has committed to not developing Lot 18 until such time as the
existing utilities are inoperable and need replaced, or until provision of utilities is not necessary for the northern
property owner.
Preliminary Plat
The plat application reflects the creation of 30 single-family lots, three new public streets, dedication of open
space, dedication of right-of-way, and the 2.62 acres of open space dedication. The applicant submitted a
Traffic Impact Study that recommends the construction of a westbound left turn lane on Shier Rings Road to
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 4 of 16
mitigate the anticipated development traffic impacts. The applicant will need to continue to work with staff to
identify right-of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound
left turn lane as well as to identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior
to City Council submittal. A shared-use path is proposed along Shier Rings Road to provide connectivity to the
Cosgray Road shared-use path, and a sidewalk is proposed on both sides of the streets within the
development. The applicant will need to continue to coordinate with staff and emergency services to determine
acceptable street names, which will need to be approved prior to submission of the proposed development to
City Council for approval.
Staff has reviewed the rezoning/PUD application against the applicable criteria and recommends approval with
seven conditions and recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with one condition.
Applicant Presentation
Todd Foley, applicant’s representative, POD Design, 100 Northwoods Blvd., Suite 100, Columbus, OH 43235,
stated that they have revised the proposal per the Commission’s suggestions with the Informal Review in
September, including the density, open space, lot sizes and configuration, and building separation. The site
geometry is unique, and they have been able to provide open space in the northwest corner that they
anticipate will become a destination point for bikepath users. The reserve areas will offer both passive and
active spaces. They anticipate that the development will attract more mature homebuyers, who are interested
in larger, 3,000+ sq. ft., single-family homes within the $450,000 price range. This will be a boutique-type of
development. The home exteriors will be designed to be reminiscent of traditional architectural styles
incorporating front porches with modest setbacks emphasizing neighborhood interaction and walkability. The
applicant is interested in a farmhouse character. Four-sided architecture will be provided. They request the
Commission’s support.
Commission Questions
Mr. Grimes stated that the staff report mentions that the eastern portion of the site was not included in the
original annexation. How will that be addressed?
Mr. Hounshell responded that all three of the sites are now annexed into the City, The entire area is within
the City of Dublin.
Ms. Fox inquired if the homes would vary in footprint sizes.
Mr. Foley responded affirmatively. The lots will be pre-programmed with the home footprints permitted. There
are ranch and two-story footprints, most of which will have 3-car garages, basements and first-floor master
suites, and square footage beginning at 3,000 square feet.
Ms. Fox stated that she likes the varying lot sizes. She is curious if the interior lots, Lots 23-30, would be
smaller footprints than the footprints on Lots 5, 6, 16 and 17.
Mr. Foley responded that there are a variety of lot sizes and a ppropriately corresponding footprint sizes. There
will no adjacent repetitive elevation designs.
Ms. Fox inquired if the frontages of the homes would be staggered along the street frontage, rather than
positioned in a straight line.
Mr. Foley responded that there would be a natural staggering of the homes along the street frontage.
Ms. Fox inquired if all of the homes will have a rear door leading to a patio space.
Mr. Foley responded affirmatively. There will be rear doors leading to patios in varying locations on the homes.
Ms. Fox inquired if the Development text permits a 6-foot fence.
Jackson Reynolds, Smith and Hale LLC, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 460, Columbus OH 43215, stated that 6-
foot privacy fences would be permitted around the rear patio only, not along the entire rear lot line.
Ms. Fox responded that she believes the City Code requires the fence height not to exceed four feet.
Mr. Hounshell confirmed that the fence height may not exceed four feet.
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 5 of 16
Ms. Call inquired what percent of the homes would have three-car garages.
Mr. Foley responded that he does not know the exact number, but all the home designs accommodate a
three-car garage.
Ms. Call inquired if any of the lots would be prohibitive to having a three-car garage.
Mr. Foley responded that although all the floorplans have not been finalized, he believes all the lots will
accommodate three-car garages.
Ms. Call inquired the width of the walking path within the active area.
Mr. Foley stated that he believes the path width is 5 to 6 feet. The intent is to make the distinction between
the public and private areas apparent.
Ms. Call inquired if the width of the public road lanes would be approximately 12 feet.
Mr. Hounshell responded that the streets would be built per public road standards, which require 12-foot wide
lanes.
Ms. Call inquired if the turn capability for emergency vehicle navigation had been confirmed.
Mr. Hounshell that Washington Township Fire Services have reviewed and confirmed there would be no issues
for emergency vehicle navigation.
Mr. Schneier inquired if public path access is located only in the northwest reserve area, and not in the other
two reserves.
Mr. Hounshell responded that there is an existing public path along Cosgray Road, and the most feasible
access from the neighborhood to that path is from the northwest reserve area.
Mr. Schneier inquired if a variety in building materials and colors would be required.
Mr. Foley responded that a variety in both materials and colors is required; no identical materials or colors
can occur in adjacent homes. There could be similar materials, but they must be configured differently. He
noted that, per the earlier inquiry concerning path width and length, he has confirmed that the width will be
six feet and the path length will be approximately 330 linear feet.
Mr. Supelak inquired if the tree replacement on the site would occur as the site develops, and when the
development is completed, a final survey would be taken to ensure all replacement occurred as required.
Mr. Hounshell responded that the tree replacement would occur as the site is developed. The Final
Development Plan will provide the total number of tree replacements necessary, and the City Landscape team
will work with the developer to determine the appropriate location of those trees.
Commission Discussion
Ms. Kennedy stated that the applicant has addressed the concerns raised at the Informal Review. In regard
to the earlier statement about the length of the path that will be provided in the northwest area – a 330-foot
long path is only 0.06 miles, which is insignificant. If there were ability to expand that loop and increase the
length to make it a more meaningful distance for walkers, she would encourage that. However, she is
supportive of the proposed plan.
Mr. Schneier stated that the applicant was responsive to the Commission’s previous input. He believes the
revised plan reflects a great project.
Mr. Grimes thanked the applicant for a much-improved plan. He is supportive of the plan, as well.
Mr. Supelak stated that the improvements to the plan are appreciated. He appreciates the architecture,
although, as he mentioned at the Informal Review, he would encourage greater use of the stacked stone in
some of the homes. Presently, it is depicted only at the base of the homes.
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 6 of 16
Mr. Fishman stated that the plans depict a shade structure or g azebo in the larger reserve area. He would like
to encourage that the structure be a gazebo, due to the type of neighborhood this will become. Two-story
homes with three-car garages will have families. In Dublin, the gazebos in family neighborhoods are well
used, if their size permits. Gathering places in our neighborhoods are very important; therefore, he would
recommend that the conditions for approval require a gazebo of a size conducive for gatherings. Additionally,
some of these driveways will be quite long, and long blacktop driveways next to hardiplank houses are much
too prominent. In addition, blacktop requires more care than other driveways. He recommends that the
driveways be either stamped concrete or brick. In summary, he would require the addition of a gazebo and
the elimination of blacktop driveways.
Ms. Fox stated that she appreciates the revisions the applicant has made to the plan. She is aware of no other
applicant who reduced the density by over 10% when a reduction was requested. Eliminating four of the 34
lots was significant. The open space that has been provided is excellent. On the northwest corner, the visual
presentation of the development to the public street is very attractive. In regard to the covered structure, she
would encourage consideration of a covered terrace with a fireplace, rather than a gazebo. That type of space
would be a usable amenity in all seasons, and would be quite attractive located near the pond. She would
suggest, as well, that the small walking path surround a perennial or cottage garden. At the other end of the
pond, she would suggest a wood deck be added, where fishing could occur. In regard to the patio privacy
fencing, she recommends the use of wrought iron, perhaps with partial masonry, which would add privacy
but not entirely block the views. Between Lot 26 and 27, there is a straight view from Ayrshire Road to the
pond. Adding a landscape feature near the street could “frame” that view and add some visual interest to that
rear view of the lots.
Mr. Foley stated that he appreciates her suggestions, and as final engineering occurs, they will be mindful of
opportunities within the areas between the lots that she has pointed out.
Courtney Mitchell, 5884 Dunheath Loop, Dublin, OH, 43016, stated that she is co-owner and developer of this
project and also a resident of the Ballantrae community. She can confirm that all of the lots and floorplans
will accommodate a three-car garage. In addition, the path in this neighborhood will connect to the path that
runs throughout the adjacent Ballantrae development. That connection will provide a nice path length for all
walkers and runners.
Mr. Fishman noted that he is not adamant that the covered structure be a gazebo, only that it provide a
covered gathering space for families.
Ms. Call thanked the applicant for the revision to the sideyard setbacks. The requirement that there be no less
than 14 feet between houses makes a difference. She appreciates the confirmation regarding three-car
garages, because 3-car garages come with 3-car driveways, reducing the number of vehicles parked on the
street. Because stamped concrete and brick driveways are more costly, she would suggest concrete as the
alternative to asphalt driveways. She has one concern regarding Lot 10. Typically, the main family gathering
area is in the front of the home. Due to the driveway location, which appears cannot be altered, there will be
headlight intrusion into the home.
Ms. Mitchell responded that all of the floorplans provide the main living space at the back of the home. In the
front area, there is either a den or a dining room.
Mr. Foley noted that in the development text, they have committed to planting a screening hedge at the front
of that lot that will blend with the home’s landscaping. In regard to the driveways, the current proposal is for
either blacktop or concrete driveways.
Mr. Reynolds stated that the development text does not address the driveway materials. However, they can
address that issue and make a commitment with the Final Development Plan.
Planning and Zoning Commission DRAFT
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2020
Page 7 of 16
Ms. Call stated that because this is a PUD, the driveway material can be made a requirement of the
development plan.
Mr. Fishman indicated that is his recommendation. However, stamped concrete is not necessary; a
requirement for concrete would be sufficient.
Commission consensus was to prohibit asphalt driveways.
Ms. Fox stated she would request a condition that the fence height to be reduced to the usual height required
by the City, which she believes is 4 feet. The fence materials also should be defined to avoid the use of
numerous materials within the neighborhood.
Mr. Reynolds responded that the applicant will commit to a four-foot high enclosure, and they will provide a
more specific architectural description with the Final Development Plan.
Ms. Call inquired if the applicant was in agreement with the proposed conditions.
Mr. Foley responded that they have no objections.
Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Fishman seconded a recommendation for approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary
Development Plan to City Council with the following 10 conditions:
1) That the applicant continue to coordinate with staff and emergency services to determine acceptable
street names and will need to update the plans with the approved street names prior to City Council
submittal;
2) That the applicant continue to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management
compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances;
3) That the applicant continue to work with staff to identify right-of-way needs to accommodate the
Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as well as to identify the
appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to City Council submittal;
4) That the applicant work with staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree survey and development plan
prior to final development plan submittal;
5) That the applicant continue to work with staff to determine the appropriate number of replacement
trees to be located within the landscape buffer;
6) The applicant revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard setback for lots 1-5 to
reflect what is shown on the development plan;
7) That the applicant maintain lot 18 until the lot is sold for development;
8) That the applicant provide open space amenities in accordance to the Commission comments with
the final development plan;
9) That the text be revised to eliminate asphalt drives; and
10) That the applicant change the fencing height from 6 feet to 4 feet and provide a consistent fence
detail with the Final Development Plan.
Vote: Mr. Grimes, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Mr. Schneier,
yes; Ms. Fox, yes.
[Motion carried 7-0]
Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Fishman seconded a recommendation for approval of the Preliminary Plat to City
Council with one condition:
1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City
Council submittal.
Vote: Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Grimes, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes;
Mr. Schneier, yes.
[Motion carried 7-0]
Ms. Call indicated that Cases 4 and 5 would be heard together.
Planning and Zoning Commission
December 10, 2020
PLANNING 5200 Emerald Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 phone 614.410.4600 dublinohiousa.gov
20-092Z/PDP & 20-093PP – AYRSHIRE
FARMS
Summary Zoning Map
This is a request for review and recommendation
of approval for a Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan and Preliminary Plat
applications to rezone approximately 11.37 acres
from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District for the development of 30
single-family homes, dedicated open space, and
the dedication of three public streets.
Site Location
Southeast of the intersection of Shier Rings Road
and Cosgray Road.
Current Zoning
R, Rural District
Proposed Zoning
PUD, Preliminary Development Plan
Property Owners
MC Shier Rings, LLC
Applicant/Representative
Todd Foley, POD Design
Applicable Land Use Regulations
Zoning Code Section 153.050
Case Managers
Zach Hounshell, Planner I
(614) 410-4652
zhounshell@dublin.oh.us
Next Steps
Following a review and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the
rezoning/preliminary development plan and preliminary plat applications will be forwarded to City
Council for review and determination. The applicant will also be eligible to submit a final
development plan and final plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 2 of 15
1. Context Map
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 3 of 15
2. Overview
Background
The site was annexed into the City of Dublin on March 11, 2020 (Ordinance 02-20). Upon
annexation, the site was automatically zoned R, Rural District pursuant to the Zoning
Code.
Case History
In September 2020, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and commented on an
informal review of a Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/Preliminary Plat application
to rezone 11.37 acres from a Rural District to a Planned Unit Development District for the
potential future development of 34 single-family homes. Commission members expressed
concerns regarding the lack of usable open space located on the site. Commissioners
requested that the density of the development be decreased by eliminating some lots.
Commissioners also supported the variation in lot sizes across the development.
Site Characteristics
Natural Features
The western portion of the site is being farmed and contains no natural features except for
rows of trees along the southern and eastern boundaries. The eastern portion of the site is
comprised of the rear portion of two rural, residential parcels which are not entirely
annexed into the City. Both parcels include trees and other vegetation.
Surrounding Land Use and Development Character
North: ID-4, Vacant
East: Unincorporated, Washington Township, vacant
South: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District (Ballantrae)
West: Unincorporated, Washington Township, single-family homes
Road, Pedestrian and Bike Network
The site has 580 feet of frontage along Cosgray Road, which includes a bike path. The site
has 450 feet of frontage along Shier Rings Road, which currently includes no pedestrian or
bicycle facilities.
Utilities
Utilities will be extended to the site as part of this proposal.
Process
Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) is the second step in establishing a
PUD. PUDs are created to address unique conditions, which cannot easily be addressed by a
standard zoning district. The PUD zoning approval includes a development text, which serves
as the zoning regulation, and a preliminary development plan, which serves to define the site
layout and development parameters.
A Preliminary Plat is also proposed in conjunction with this Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan. A Final Development Plan and Final Plat approving the final details
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 4 of 15
associated with the development would follow the approval of a Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan/Preliminary Plat.
Future Land Use
The Future Land Use Map in the
Community Plan designates the
site has a Mixed Residential Low
Density (2-3 dwelling units per
acre) designation.
The Mixed Residential Low Density
is described as “areas that are
intended to provide a mix of
housing options and transition
from existing single-family
neighborhoods at a typical density of 3.0 du/ac.”
The particular category for residential character is intended for neighborhoods that
incorporate a variety of single and multiple family dwelling styles, generally in larger
projects. The integration of a broad range of housing within neighborhoods is intended to
allow for greater housing choices particularly for younger and older age groups, and
provide market flexibility to allow for a wider range of housing choices, consistent with
Dublin’s Land Use Residential Principles. Larger sites are expected to incorporate a mix of
housing types and to be designed to look, feel and function as a cohesive neighborhood.
Smaller sites, such as the site in consideration today, may include a single housing type,
appropriately scaled to the surrounding development context, and consistent with Special
Area Plan recommendations where applicable.
Thoroughfare Plan
Shier Rings Road and Cosgray Road are both considered a collector street for the segments
adjacent to the site in consideration. Collector streets provide both access to property and traffic
circulation within residential neighborhoods and commercial or industrial areas. This system
collects traffic from local streets such as those through residential neighborhoods, and disperses
it to the arterial system. The collector street system may also carry local bus routes where
appropriate.
Cosgray Road from Tuttle Crossing Boulevard to Shier Rings Road is currently two lanes and has
a 60-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for improvements to the right-of-way by
potentially expanding the lanes to three lanes, and also extending the width of the right-of-way
from 60 feet to 70 feet. Shier Rings Road from Cosgray Road to Eiterman Road is two lanes and
has a 50-foot right-of-way. The Thoroughfare Plan calls for improvements to the right-of-way by
extending the width of the right-of-way from 50 feet to 60 feet.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 5 of 15
Proposal
This is a request for review and recommendation of approval for the rezoning of an
approximately 11.37-acre site from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development
District to allow for the development of 30 single-family lots. The request also includes the
review and recommendation of approval for a preliminary development plan and preliminary
plat for the development of the 30 single-family lots, as well as three new public streets and
approximately 2.62 acres of open space.
Use & Density
The applicant is proposing single-
family residential uses on the site,
with one principal structure per lot.
The applicant is proposing a density
of approximately 2.63 dwellings per
acre, which meets the
recommended density for the Mixed
Residential Low Density
classification for the site by being
less than three units per acre.
Layout
The applicant is proposing 30 single-family lots, three public streets, and approximately 2.62
acres of public open space on the approximately 11.37-acre site. Since the informal review in
September, the applicant has decreased the number of lots from 34 lots, and has increased the
amount of public open space from approximately 2.24 acres. The applicant eliminated lot 1 from
the illustration shown in the ‘Previous’ image to create a larger, usable open space for the
neighborhood that connects to the
perimeter bike path and allows for
better use of the retention pond,
which can be viewed in ‘current’
image.
The applicant is proposing a single
entry street into the development
from Shier Rings Road, which
terminates in culs-de-sac to the east
and the west of the north-south
entry road. All roads are proposed to
be public streets. The proposed lots
are located along the roads in the
development with open space
reserves in the southeast portion of the site and the northern portion of the site. The two
Previous
Current
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 6 of 15
largest reserves (Reserves A and C) accommodate stormwater management ponds. A bikepath
will be extended along the Shier-Rings Road frontage.
The applicant is proposing
perimeter setbacks on
each side of the
development to create a
buffer from Ballentrae to
the south and east, Shier-
Rings Road to the north,
and Cosgray Road to the
west. The building and
applicable pavement
setbacks are shown in the
adjacent table. Shared use
paths and/or sidewalks
may be located within the
perimeter setback.
Development Standards
The applicant has provided a development text that outlines the proposed development
requirements for the site. The proposed development provides a variety of lot sizes, ranging
from 0.16-acre (Lot 23) to 0.52-acre (Lot 16). All lots have a minimum lot width of 64 feet at
the right-of-way line and have a maximum lot coverage of 60%, which includes the principal
structure, accessory structures, and all impervious surfaces.
The proposed setbacks for each lot of the development are located in the table below. The
applicant is proposing larger setbacks from Cosgray Road and neighboring residential lots, while
proposing smaller setbacks for the interior lots of the development (Lots 23-30) and allowing for
patios to encroach within the setback. The applicant is showing a rear yard setback of 30 feet
for lots 1-5 in the development text, but the development plan shows a 45-foot setback. The
applicant should revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard setback for lots 1-5
to reflect what is shown on the development plan.
Property Setbacks Requirement
Front Setback 20 feet
Side Yard Setback
Lots 1-15: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
14-foot separation between structures.
Lots 16-30: 6-foot minimum per side with a minimum
16-foot separation between structures.
Rear Yard Setback
Lots 1-5: 45 feet
Lots 6-22: 30 feet
Lots 23-30: 20 feet (Patios may encroach 10 feet into
rear setback)
SETBACK TABLE
Property Line Setback
North Property Line
(Shier-Rings Road)
45-foot building and pavement setback
North Property Line
(Not Shier-Rings Road)
20-foot building setback
West Property Line
(Cosgray Road)
45-foot building and pavement setback
South Property Line
(Ballentrae)
20-foot building setback
East Property Line
(Ballentrae)
20-foot building setback
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 7 of 15
Lot 18 of the development has a 48.5-foot easement to the rear of the lot that is in place for
existing utilities that operate for the lot north of the site. Within the easement is a leech field,
which serves the property owner to the north. The applicant has worked with staff to determine
the best solution for the situation and committed to not developing Lot 18 until such time as
the existing utilities are inoperable and need replaced, or until the need for the utilities is not
necessary for the northern property owner.
Architecture & Building Materials
The applicant has provided a statement regarding the character of the proposed homes for
Ayrshire Farms outlining: “The single-family home exteriors will be designed to be reminiscent
of traditional architectural styles incorporating front porches with modest setbacks emphasizing
neighborhood interaction and walkability. The architectural character shall incorporate
vocabulary from traditional details. Continuity of elements and scale and the commonality of
building materials will reinforce the architectural cohesiveness while providing architectural
diversity.” The applicant has submitted conceptual drawings are for reference only of the design
character. These drawings are not subject to approval with the preliminary development plan
application.
The development text proposes permitted cladding materials such as brick, stone, manufactured
stone, wood, stucco, cementitious siding, or any combination of the choices. The text proposes
trim materials such as cementitious board wood, aluminum (for gutters and downspouts only),
EIFS, copper, or fiber-cement products. Proposed paint selections include white, earth tones, or
other muted colors that would complement the surrounding neighborhoods and would be
cohesive throughout the development. The proposed roof materials include dimensional asphalt
shingles, wood shingles, slate shingles, copper, standing seam metal, and/or tile. The proposed
text requires homes with chimneys be clad with brick, stone, or manufactured stone. The
proposed garages details include a decorative carriage style and are not permitted to occupy
more than 50% of the front elevation of each home.
The applicant is committing to four-sided architecture on each of the 30 lots, along with
additional attention to detail for open/exposed facades at intersections of the development (Lots
1, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30). The open/exposed lots are chosen based upon locations of the
development that would give a ‘first impression’ of the development. These lots are located at
the entrance of the development to the north, the first homes seen from the intersection of
Shier-Rings Road and Cosgray Road, and/or at the intersection of the interior public streets. The
proposed development text requires these lots to have additional architectural elements and
enhanced landscaping on the facades of the home exposed to these key locations. Architectural
elements are not described in the preliminary development text. The applicant will be required
to state what elements qualify for this requirement in the final development text.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 8 of 15
Landscaping
The applicant has provided a tree survey, which shows the location of existing trees and
specifies which trees will be removed with the development. The applicant has identified 942
caliper inches that will be removed with the development and require replacement, a majority of
which are flowering pear, mulberry and silver maple. Protected trees along the southern
property line adjacent to Ballantrae will be preserved. Storm sewer is proposed adjacent to the
southern property line with the disturbance area shown setback 15 feet to minimize the impacts
to the root zones. The proposed sanitary sewer and other infrastructure may adversely affect
the root systems of some trees and replacement will be required if the trees cannot be
preserved.
The applicant is proposing a landscape buffer along the rear yards of properties that line
Cosgray Road. The code-prescribed buffer will mimic the existing buffer treatment used at
Ballantrae to the south with evergreen and deciduous trees, along with masses of ornamental
grasses. Mounding will be used to increase the height and buffering capacity. Rubble walls and
stone outcroppings similar to those in Ballantrae will be also used sporadically in city owned and
HOA maintained reserves to help link the two developments. Specific details will be completed
with the Final Development Plan. However, the applicant should continue to work with Staff to
determine the appropriate number of replacement trees to be located within the landscape
buffer.
Trees are shown to be preserved east of the new entry drive. Trees #7712 and 7713 are shown
to be preserved but the table inconsistently shows them to be removed. These and any other
inconsistencies on the tree survey will need to be corrected prior to the Final Development Plan
submittal.
Traffic & Access
As mentioned above, the applicant is proposing a single entry street into the development from
Shier Rings Road, which terminates in cul-de-sac roads to the east and the west of the north-
south entry road. All roads are proposed to be public streets. The proposal also includes the
construction of a westbound left turn lane on Shier Rings Road to serve the development. The
applicant will need to continue to work with staff to identify right-of-way needs to
accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as
well as to identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to
City Council submittal.
The proposed street names have not been approved by emergency services. The applicant will
need to continue to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to determine acceptable
street names and will need to update the plans with the approved street names prior to City
Council submittal.
The proposal includes the extension of shared-use path along Shier Rings Road to provide
connectivity to the Cosgray Road shared-use path. Sidewalk is proposed on both sides of all
public streets throughout the development.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 9 of 15
Traffic Impact Study
The applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) as required for a rezoning application.
The study provides analysis of the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed development
and models the traffic on the existing roadways. The TIS analyzed the Shier Rings Road &
Cosgray Road, Shier Rings Road & Eiterman Road, and Shier Rings Road & Site Access Point
intersections. The TIS also incorporated the future Shier Rings Road realignment project, also
known as University Boulevard, into the analysis.
As identified in the TIS, the proposal includes the construction of a westbound left turn lane on
Shier Rings Road to serve the development. This left turn lane will be constructed at the same
time as the local street construction for the development. The TIS is considered accepted by
the City of Dublin Engineering Division.
Open Space Reserves
The proposal includes three reserves of open space (Reserves A-C). Reserve A is approximately
1.48 acres and is located at the northwest corner of the development. Reserve A includes a
retention pond maintained by the City of Dublin, multi-use paths, an entry feature, landscaping,
and active use amenities such as a gazebo or shelter. Reserve B is approximately 0.28 acre and
is located east of the entry drive into the development, and includes only an entry feature and
landscaping. Reserve C is approximately 0.86 acre and is located at the southeast corner of the
development. Reserve C includes a retention pond maintained by the City of Dublin, as well as
benches, landscaping, and open space for passive use of the area.
Reserve Description Acres Ownership Maintenance
A Northwest corner of
development at intersection of
Shier Rings Road and Cosgray
Road
1.48 City of
Dublin
HOA*
B East of the entry drive 0.28 City of
Dublin
HOA
C Southeast corner of development 0.86 City of
Dublin
HOA*
*Maintenance of the Retention Ponds in Reserves A & C will be handled by the City of Dublin.
Entry Feature
The applicant is proposing entry features with both Reserves A and B. The entry features may
include fencing, posts, columns, walls, trellises, gazebos, signs, and/or landscaping. The entry
features details will be approval at the time of the Final Development Plan.
Utilities
Sanitary
The site is served by the 8-inch public sanitary sewer between Lots 541 and 542 (5936 Trafalgar
Lane and 5944 Trafalgar Lane) within the Ballantrae development. The proposal includes the
extension of public sanitary through the site to serve the development as well as to provide
future sanitary sewer access to the adjacent parcels to the north.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 10 of 15
Water
The site is served by the 16-inch public water main located at the Shier Rings Road & Cosgray
Road roundabout. The proposal includes the extension of public water main along the south side
of Shier Rings Road to and through the development.
Stormwater Management
Stormwater management for the site consists of a network of storm sewer that drains into two
retention basins located at the northwest and southeast portions of the site to maintain existing
drainage conveyance patterns. The northwest retention basin outlets to Shier Rings Road while
the southeast retention basin outlets to the catch basin between lots 542 and 543 (5944
Trafalgar Lane and 5950 Trafalgar Lane).
Stormwater management associated with the Shier Rings Road widening to accommodate
the westbound turn lane is required. The applicant will need to continue to work with
Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management compliance in accordance with Chapter
53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances.
Preliminary Plat
With the submission of the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, a Preliminary Plat
application has also been submitted for recommendation of approval to City Council. The plat
application includes the creation of 30 single-family lots, three new public streets, dedication
of open space, and dedication of right-of-way.
The applicant is proposing approximately 2.62 acres of open space dedication for this
development, which exceeds the 1.13 acres of open space required by the Subdivision
Regulations. All open spaces are proposed to be owned by the City and maintained by the
Homeowners Association, with the exception of the retention ponds. The maintenance of the
functionality of the ponds will be the responsibility of the City.
The applicant will continue to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to accommodate
the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as well as to
identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to City
Council submittal. The applicant will also continue to coordinate with Staff and emergency
services to determine acceptable street names and will need to update the plans with the
approved street names prior to City Council submittal.
3. Criteria Analysis
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable
standards of the Zoning Code;
Criterion Met. This proposal is generally consistent with the purpose, intent and
applicable development standards of the Zoning Code requirements.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 11 of 15
2) The proposed development is in conformity with Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan,
Bikeway Plan, and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will
not unreasonably burden the existing street network;
Criterion Met. The proposed development meets the proposed designation for a Mixed
Residential Low Density Classification. Staff considers the site to be a ‘smaller site’,
which allows a single housing type, as defined in the Community Plan. The applicant
meets the intent and requirements of all other plans and is not burdening the existing
street network.
3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the city and immediate
vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the
surrounding areas;
Criterion Met. Overall, staff is supportive of the general layout and use shown with the
proposed development. The applicant has addressed density concerns from the
Informal Review in September to lower density while adding active open space.
4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the city so that the use and value of
property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded;
Criterion Met. The proposed development meets the recommended land use designation
of Mixed Residential Low Density.
5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the
objectives of the Community Plan;
Criterion Met. The proposed open space provision exceeds the requirements. The
provided open space at the northwest corner of the development offers active space for
the homeowners of the development and connects to the existing bike path along
Cosgray Road. The open space will be usable by members of the neighborhood and
those utilizing the existing bike network throughout Dublin.
6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and
protects the natural resources of the site;
Criterion Met with Conditions. The proposal will have to adhere to Code for any removal
and replacement of the vegetation on site. The proposed respects the natural features
on the site and conserves vegetation through landscape buffers on the boundaries of
the development. The applicant work with Staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree
survey prior to final development plan submittal. The applicant should continue to work
with Staff to determine the appropriate number of replacement trees to be located
within the landscape buffer.
7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been
or are being provided;
Criterion Met with Condition. Stormwater management for the development is provided
via two retention basins with a network of storm sewer and associated structures.
Stormwater management associated with the Shier Rings Road widening to
accommodate the westbound turn lane is required. The applicant will need to continue to
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 12 of 15
work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management compliance in
accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances. The extension of public
utilities is included with this development proposal. The applicant will need to continue
to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to determine acceptable street names
and will need to update the plans with the approved street names prior to City Council
submittal.
8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to
minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public
safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the
proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non-conflicting circulation
system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians;
Criterion Met with Condition. The City has accepted the submitted Traffic Impact Study
that recommends the construction of a westbound left turn lane on Shier Rings Road to
mitigate the anticipated development traffic impacts. The applicant will need to continue
to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road
widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as well as to identify the
appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to City Council
submittal. Shared-use path is proposed along Shier Rings Road to provide connectivity
to the Cosgray Road shared-use path. Sidewalk is proposed on both sides of the streets
within the development.
9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities
provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the
larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community;
Criterion Met. The development fits within the scope of the surrounding neighborhoods.
The Future Land Use designation classifies this site be more transitional moving north
from Ballantrae into the West Innovation District north of Shier Rings Road. This
development is proposed to be more dense than Ballantrae, but still fits within the scope
of the neighborhood.
10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between
buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and
parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall
acceptability of the development plans contribute to the orderly development of land
within the city;
Criterion Met with Condition. The proposed development has made modifications since
the Informal Review in September to account for larger setbacks between buildings and
lower density throughout the development, which were two topics of discuss originally.
The development contributes to the orderly development of land within the city. The
applicant should revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard setback for
lots 1-5 to reflect what is shown on the development plan.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 13 of 15
11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to
maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage
areas;
Criterion Met with Condition. Stormwater management for the development is provided
via two retention basins with a network of storm sewer and associated structures.
Stormwater management associated with the Shier Rings Road widening to
accommodate the westbound turn lane is required. The applicant will need to continue
to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management compliance in
accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances.
12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development
justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Zoning
Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the
intent of the Planned Development District regulations;
Criterion Met. The development meets the intent of the Planned Development District
regulations and the future land use plan. The site is minor in scale to a majority of
developments within the City, but the layout and design of the homes and open space
contribute to the design of the City.
13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the
surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the city;
Criterion Met. The development text includes material and designs standards. The
conceptual drawings provided to show the potential building designs present a ‘farm-
style’ housing selection that is suitable in the southwest portion of the City and is
complementary to the surrounding neighborhoods.
14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed
infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield
the intended overall development;
Criterion Met. The development will be completed in one phase.
15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public
improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area;
Criterion Met with condition. The City has accepted the submitted Traffic Impact Study
that recommends the construction of a westbound left turn lane on Shier Rings Road to
mitigate the anticipated development traffic impacts. The applicant will need to continue
to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road
widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as well as to identify the
appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to City Council
submittal.
16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the
Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development;
Criterion Met with condition. The City has accepted the submitted Traffic Impact Study
that recommends the construction of a westbound left turn lane on Shier Rings Road to
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 14 of 15
mitigate the anticipated development traffic impacts. The applicant will need to continue
to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to accommodate the Shier Rings Road
widening associated with the westbound left turn lane as well as to identify the
appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way prior to City Council
submittal.
Preliminary Plat
1) Plat Information and Construction Requirements
Criterion Met with Conditions. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations. The applicant will be required to make any minor technical
adjustments prior to City Council review. Modifications and improvements approved
with the rezoning and preliminary development plan should be reflected on this
preliminary plat.
2) Lots, Street, Sidewalk, and Bike Path Standards
Criterion Met with Conditions. This proposal is consistent with the lot, street, sidewalk,
and bike path standards of the Subdivision Regulations. The applicant will need to
continue to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to determine acceptable
street names and will need to update the plans with the approved street names prior to
City Council submittal.
3) Utilities
Criterion Met with Conditions. Proposed and existing utilities are shown on the
preliminary plat. The applicant will continue to work with Engineering to demonstrate
stormwater management compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin
Code of Ordinances.
4) Open Space Requirements
Criterion Met. The proposed open space provision meets the requirements. Open space
is dedicated to the City and the plat accurately shows the ownership and maintenance
of open space.
4. Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan finding that
the proposal meets the review criteria as outlined above, without significant revision.
Should the Commission submit a recommendation of approval, Staff recommends the
following six conditions:
1) That the applicant continues to coordinate with Staff and emergency services to determine
acceptable street names and will need to update the plans with the approved street names
prior to City Council submittal;
2) That the applicant continues to work with Engineering to demonstrate stormwater
management compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances;
3) That the applicant continues to work with Staff to identify right-of-way needs to
accommodate the Shier Rings Road widening associated with the westbound left turn lane
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-092Z-PDP & 20-093PP| Ayrshire Farms
Thursday, December 10, 2020 | Page 15 of 15
as well as to identify the appropriate conveyance mechanism for any needed right-of-way
prior to City Council submittal;
4) That the applicant work with Staff to correct inconsistencies in the tree survey prior to final
development plan submittal;
5) That the applicant should continue to work with Staff to determine the appropriate number
of replacement trees to be located within the landscape buffer; and,
6) The applicant should revise the development text to allow for a 45-foot rear yard setback for
lots 1-5 to reflect what is shown on the development plan.
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with one condition:
1) The applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to
City Council submittal.
PLANNING 5200 Emerald Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 phone 614.410.4600 dublinohiousa.gov
RECORD OF DISCUSSION
Planning & Zoning Commission
Thursday, September 17, 2020 | 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
6. Ayrshire Farms PID: 272-000166
20-092INF Informal Review
Proposal: Informal Review of a potential future development proposal to rezone an
11.4-acre site from Rural District to Planned Unit Development District to
develop Lots for 34 single-family homes.
Location: Southeast of the intersection of Shier-Rings Road and Cosgray Road.
Request: Review and non-binding feedback under the provisions of Zoning Code
Section 153.050.
Applicant: Todd Foley, POD Design
Planning Contacts: Zach Hounshell, Planner I; and Claudia D. Husak, Senior Planner/Current
Planning Manager
Contact Information: 614.410.4652, zhoushell@dublin.oh.us; and
614.410.4675, chusak@dublin.oh.us
Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/20-092
RESULT: The Commission reviewed and commented on an Informal Review of a Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan/Preliminary Plat application to rezone 11.37 acres from a Rural District to a Planned
Unit Development District for the potential future development of 34 single-family homes. Commission
members expressed concern regarding the lack of usable open space located on the site. Commissioners
requested that the density of the development be decreased by eliminating some lots. Commissioners
supported the variation in lot sizes across the development.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Jane Fox Yes
Warren Fishman Yes
Kristina Kennedy Absent
Mark Supelak Yes
Rebecca Call Yes
Leo Grimes Yes
Lance Schneier Yes
STAFF CERTIFICATION
____________________________________
Zach Hounshell, Planner I
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 13 of 20
Mt. Toddy responded that they would be willing to do so; it is in alignment with the requested condition.
They will work with staff to ensure the buffer is adequate along Muirfield Drive.
Mr. Grimes moved, Mr. Supelak seconded to approve the Amended Final Development Plan with one
condition:
1) That the applicant continue to work with staff to finalize landscaping details with the pickleball
courts addition, subject to staff approval.
Vote: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Schneier, yes; Mr. Grimes, yes.
[Motion approved 6-0]
6. Ayreshire Farms, PID: 272-000166, 20-092INF, INFORMAL REVIEW
Ms. Call stated that this is a request for Informal Review of a potential future development proposal to
rezone an 11.4-acre site from Rural District to Planned Unit Development District to develop lots for 34,
single-family homes. The site is southeast of the intersection of Shier-Rings Road with Cosgray Road.
Staff Presentation
Ms. Husak stated this is a request for Informal Review and feedback regarding a proposal to rezone 11.37
acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for the potential future development
of 34 single-family homes at the southeast intersection of Shier-Rings and Cosgray Roads. The site was
annexed from Washington Township into the City of Dublin on March 11, 2020 (Ordinance 02-20). Upon
annexation, the site was automatically zoned R, Rural District, pursuant to the Zoning Code. Because that
is the least intensively developable zoning, a rezoning would be required with any development. The
applicant filed an application for rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan for a PUD, Planned Unit
Development District, and also for a Preliminary Plat for the PUD. Based on the Commission’s review and
discussions of several recent developments, staff recommended that the applicant request an Informal
Review prior to submitting the development proposal. The next time this application would come before
the Commission, it will be to request a recommendation to City Council.
This L-shaped site is located at the southeast intersection of Shier-Rings and Cosgray Roads. The Ballantrae
community is located south of the site, and there are single-family lots along Trafalgar Lane immediately
adjacent to the site. The western portion of the site is being farmed and contains no natural features except
for fence rows of trees along the southern and eastern boundaries. The eastern portion of the site is
comprised of the rear portion of two rural, residential parcels that were not annexed to the City. Both
parcels include trees and other vegetation. To the north is a site within the West Innovation District, which
is currently zoned ID-4, which would allow for research and multi-family uses. Lots on the east side of
Cosgray Road are within Washington Township. They have been for sale for some time, and staff has
received numerous inquiries about their development potential. The 11-acre site is currently vacant
farmland.
Proposal
The proposal is for 34 single-family lots along three new public streets with 2.25 acres of open space with
a density of 3.0 dwelling units (du) per acre. The Community Plan Future Land Use Map designates this
site as “Mixed Residential - Low Density,” defined as areas intended to provide a mix of housing options
and transition from existing single-family neighborhoods at a typical density of 3.0 du/ac. The Mixed
Residential land use is described as “larger sites expected to incorporate a mix of housing types and be
designed to look, feel and function as a cohesive neighborhood. Smaller sites may include a single housing
type, appropriately scaled to the surrounding development context.” The adjacent Ballantrae community
is approximately 2.0 du/acre. The applicant is proposing a single-entry street into the development from
Shier-Rings Road, which terminates in cul-de-sac roads to the east and to the west of the north-south entry
road. All roads are proposed to be public streets. Staff had concerns that lots #12 and #13 at the end of
the entry drive could be impacted by vehicle headlights; however, the applicant has indicated that the
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 14 of 20
bedrooms in those homes would likely face the rear. Staff was also concerned that a few lots are smaller
than other lots at the edges of the development, which could make vehicle maneuverability difficult for the
garages on those lots. The proposed lots are located along the roads in the development with open space
reserves in the southeast and northern portions of the site. The two largest reserves will accommodate
stormwater management ponds. Images depict the ponds with fountains and natural stone outcroppings;
some of the design elements are reminiscent of the landscaping in Ballantrae. A bikepath will be extended
along the Shier-Rings Road frontage. The 50-foot landscape buffer along Cosgray Road, established and
platted with Ballantrae, will be required to be extended with this proposal. The three open spaces in the
proposed development would be dedicated to the City but maintained by a forced and funded homeowners
association.
Architecture
The applicant has provided architectural reference images to illustrate the intended character of the
development. The general style is a farmhouse character with board and batten siding, darker color window
frames, decorative garage doors, and trim and beam accents. Ho mes are one or two stories and a majority
have a three-car garage. The applicant has stated that the intended target market for this proposal is
empty nesters.
Staff has provided the following discussion questions to assist the Commission in its discussion:
1) Are the proposed land use, density and development details appropriate?
2) Is the proposal appropriate to the character of the surrounding development pattern?
3) Does the Commission support the proposed architecture?
4) Does the common open space provide a functional and usable space for future
residents?
5) Other considerations by the Commission.
Applicant Presentation
Todd Foley, Principal, POD Design, 100 Northwoods Blvd. Suite A, Columbus, Ohio, 43235, stated that they
have been working on this project the past couple of years. However, given the Commission’s recent
discussions about changing dynamics in the home market and changing perceptions on single-family
homes, smaller lots, and smaller/narrower setbacks, it seemed advisable to pause their intent to proceed
with this project to have a discussion with the Commission about their thoughts for the project. At first
glance, it would appear that this area should have been developed as part of Ballantrae. However, the
developer has a vision for a boutique neighborhood here comprised of high-quality, single-family homes.
While there may be some empty nester buyers, this development would fit more of a transitional family,
perhaps moving from a larger Ballantrae home. This type of buyer may still be interested in large, outdoor
spaces. There will be focus on ensuring that the homes are architecturally different. Due to the adjacent
roundabout, the site has some access challenges that limit the type of development that can occur on this
site. This is a good transitional site to the West Innovation area to the north. The homes are intended to
have three-car garages and cost $450,000+. He was involved with the recently approved Hamlet project,
and with this proposal, they have attempted to provide a deeper rear yard for the homes. Much of the
open space on this site is within private open spaces, which will permit the homeowners to have fire pits
and entertaining opportunities. There is a variety of lot sizes. Passive open space has also been provided
with the retention ponds. With this plan, the focus has been placed on the lots, which permit larger homes
with enjoyable private outdoor space to the rear rather than wasted side yards. They would like to obtain
tangible feedback from the Commission on this proposal, which they believe will be a nice addition to this
area.
Commission Questions
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 15 of 20
Mr. Supelak stated that, due to some missing numbers on the information provided, it is difficult to get a
full sense of the lot coverage and intensity, topics that the Commission has recently discussed. Although
the side yards are shown, dimensions are not provided.
Ms. Husak stated that the development text the applicant provided in the original submission stated that
the minimum required side yard would be six feet, so a house could be built within six feet of the lot line,
which would mean 12 feet between homes.
Mr. Supelak inquired what is the lot coverage.
Mr. Hounshell responded that it is 60 square feet.
Ms. Call stated she assumes the floorplan selected by the homebuyer would impact the lot coverage.
Mr. Foley responded that the floorplan selected – a two-story or a ranch -- as well as whether the optional
three-car garage were included, would impact the lot coverage.
Mr. Supelak noted that the different lot shapes and proportions will add variety to the neighborhood. What
is at the rear of Lot #21?
Mr. Foley stated that lot is actually part of the leach field system for the home that is directly to the north.
There is an easement there, and they have worked with staff on creating parameters to address that issue
should that system cease to function or be eliminated. Unfortunately, it cannot be eliminated at this time.
Ms. Husak stated that is an item on which they are continuing to work; the engineer has not indicated that
would be an acceptable lot configuration.
Mr. Grimes inquired if retention ponds of this size are required for the area, as it could allow additional
usable space.
Mr. Foley responded that this is a linear site, and with the stormwater drainage patterns reflected here,
they will be forced to direct the stormwater in two directions. It is also due to the outlets on the site. With
the level of engineering that has occurred, the sizes are approximate based upon what is anticipated.
Detailed engineering will occur to ensure there are the right easements and setbacks. In regard to usable
space, this development will be connected to the Ballantrae trail system. This is an asset for residents
looking for that type of activity. They will, as well, look for opportunities for passive park spaces with the
retention ponds.
Mr. Grimes inquired if the area behind the houses has been annexed to the City.
Ms. Husak responded that it has been annexed.
Mr. Grimes stated that he assumes many layouts were considered. Was the possibility of an entrance/exit
off the roundabout rather than from Shier-Rings Road explored? He asks because the lots at the proposed
entrance are smaller than the remaining lots.
Ms. Husak responded that it was not. The applicant was required to have an extensive traffic study
conducted, and the parameters have all been addressed with engineering staff. There are regulations
regarding proximity of neighborhood entryways to roundabouts.
Mr. Foley stated that the proposed entrance is where it is required to be due to the geography and existing
roundabout. Cosgray Road presents its own challenges, as well. Discussions have occurred with Washington
Township Fire Department regarding their access requirements. There will be some lots that will be
restricted in floorplan options in order to address driveway approaches.
Mr. Grimes inquired if the farmhouse style of architecture was being overdone in this development. This is
a small development, so perhaps a more muted emphasis would be more compatible with Ballantrae and
the adjoining area. Finally, it seems the common areas should be made more functional to provide walkable
opportunities for the residents within the development.
Public Comment
There was no public comment regarding this case.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 16 of 20
Commission Questions [continued]
Ms. Fox inquired the range in square footage of the proposed homes.
Mr. Foley responded that he does not have exact square footage, but the six types of home available
average 3,000 square feet.
Ms. Fox stated that some of the lots are only .15 acres, so what is the smallest square footage offered?
Michael King, VP of Operations, Rockford Homes, 999 Polaris Pkwy, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43240 stated
that the largest would be a two-story home at 3,000 square feet. The ranch home will start at 2,000 square
feet; so the range will be from 2,000 to a maximum of 3,000 square feet. They will be pre-programming
the homes on the lots to ensure that they do not over-indulge house intensity on lots. The smaller lots,
such as Lots #28 - #34 will be the smaller home types, and they may be limited to two-car garages, which
would be a 40-foot wide product. With a three-car garage, it would become a 50-foot-wide product. The
emphasis is on rear-yard living and bikepath connectivity to Ballantrae. They are residents of Ballantrae
and recognize the importance of those features to the community. They would also like to incorporate a
10-foot tree preserve as a buffer for all the lots that abut adjacent housing.
Ms. Fox stated that she likes the fact that the lots are different sizes. However, to allow this level of high
density, it is important to provide a mix of housing options that will create a cohesive neighborhood in
exchange. However, this is a traditional suburban development layout. If the intent is that this will be a
community for empty nesters, there should be physical and social amenities provided as a tradeoff for the
proposed level of density. That could be a community garden, dog park or a central gathering area. She
appreciates the value of the rear-yard living spaces, but empty-nester communities are interested in social
connections. The open spaces here are not usable, only functional for water retention. This development
is too small for a community center, but it is not too small for other features. She is concerned about the
density, parking and proximity of the homes.
Mr. Supelak stated that on occasion, the Commission has received applications for these types of
communities looking for an exception, and we have accommodated a few, as we recognize that there is
appetite for some clustered developments in our city. He believes that the proposal for 30+ lots is the
appropriate kind of boutique development. With an Informal Review, some information is not available, so
more design would be required. Until more detail is provided, the Commission is uncomfortable
accommodating exceptions for a denser empty-nester neighborhood. He likes the proposed architecture,
which appears to be good quality, and the Farmhouse style is popular. While the consistency in the palette
is nice in some regards, at the same time, having 30 homes of the same color palette can become
milquetoast. He would probably encourage a little more of the stacked-stone element be added. He
appreciates the variety in the lots, which will lend some diversity to development. He is concerned that the
area is overbuilt to the point that the lots on the cul-de-sacs are very pinched at their front entries.
Screening the eastern approach into the neighborhood will be important. He agrees that the retention pond
areas should offer some usable amenity for the residents. Overall, he appreciates the layout and the
architecture; only refinement is needed.
Mr. Fishman stated that at the recent joint meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Architectural Review Board, there was discussion concerning this type of development. We agreed that we
were looking for greenspaces where people could walk and meet. In his opinion, the proposed plan is too
dense. The staff report indicates that Lots #1, #2, 18, #19 and #20 were problematic lots. Perhaps those
lots could be eliminated. The recommended number of lots was 28-29, but there are 34. If the five
problematic lots were eliminated, there would be usable space next to the retention ponds, which would
significantly improve the development. He could not support the proposed plan. He has observed that
families with children bought the homes in neighborhoods that were anticipated to be empty-nester
developments. Families look for affordable homes within the Dublin School District, so he anticipates the
same thing will occur here, particularly with two-story homes. This will not be an empty-nester community;
there will be children living here. He realizes this in an infill development, but he believes it must be less
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 17 of 20
dense with more walkable greenspace. That is what Dublin is recognized for and one of the reasons people
come here. He agrees with staff on their recommendation to eliminate some of the lots, as it would provide
more greenspace within the development. It is preferable not to rely on the adjacent Ballantrae community
to provide the greenspace. Finally, the architecture appears to be the latest trend using an inexpensive
product – hardiplank. The only distinguishing architectural element is the garage door, which, in time, will
be replaced, so the architecture should be fine-tuned. However, his primary concerns are the lack of usable
greenspace and the need to reduce the density by eliminating the aforementioned lots.
Ms. Call stated that she is not in favor of the six-foot minimum setbacks. If they are permitted, the combined
minimum space between the homes needs to exceed 12 feet – for instance, a six-foot plus an 8-foot
sideyard. If 3,000-square foot homes are proposed, it is essential to see the sizes of the individual home
models. The report indicates that the minimum lot size would be 0.15 acres and the maximum would be
0.4 acres, but those will be the corner lots that have some unbuildable space. Hopefully, we learned our
lesson with Oak Park, where a variety of houses were offered, including single-story and two-story models,
but most people chose the larger home. The cost difference between a small or a large home on the same
size lot is incremental. The result was that the minimum setback occurred everywhere. In this proposal,
Lots #9 through #17 are very small and all look the same. She agrees that some lots need to be eliminated.
She would challenge staff to look at the City’s open space requirements. In her previous experience in
another city, open space was designed to be usable. She shares concerns about the headlight intrusion
into Lots #11 and #12. When this proposal returns, it should reflect a maximum of 60% lot coverage and
the distribution on the lots with designated home models. This proposal is a great “first step,” and she is
confident that, working together, the result will be an attractive development. This site is located in the
applicants’ backyard, so they also want a pleasing development next to their community.
Ms. Fox stated that with informal reviews, it is important to give some helpful, construction input regarding
the proposal’s future direction. Tonight, we have mentioned items we do not like. In this potentially empty-
nester community, it would be helpful to be mindful that empty nesters are looking for homes they can
“lock and leave,” a low-maintenance lifestyle, and proximity of social connections. As proposed, this
development will draw other types of buyers. If their intent is for this to be an empty-nester community
with this level of density, perhaps they should consider reducing the square footage of the homes. There
is a new trend for “pocket neighborhoods with small, potentially 1,200-square-foot cottages, suitable for a
single adult. Such cottages could be arranged to look onto a greenspace that would attract social
interaction. With a variety of lot sizes, there can be more variety of home sizes, as well, so some larger
homes could provide the rear-yard living spaces for families. She would urge them to move toward a more
cohesive neighborhood, rather than anticipating most activity to occur in backyards or outside this
development. The hope is to create empty-nester living the homeowners can enjoy without leaving the
community. She would like them to mix up the home styles and sizes so the community has an intimacy
different from the typical suburban development. A different product is necessary for denser, empty-nester
developments that offer a lifestyle within.
Ms. Call inquired if the applicant had received sufficient input to proceed.
Mr. Foley responded that they have received great feedback from a variety of perspectives. Initially, they
did not anticipate having an Informal Review, so the development is substantially designed around this site
plan. However, they will attempt to incorporate some of the Commission’s input in the details they will be
bringing back. He appreciates the Commission’s feedback.
Mr. King clarified that the intent is not that this development will be an empty-nester product; it will be a
transitional product next to the larger 4,000-5,000 square-foot homes in the Ballantrae community. This
development offers mid-sized homes for those who really do not want to live in condominiums, which are
subject to condominium association rule. This transitional product will enable a more independent living.
They understand the need for open spaces; however, there is a significant amount in Ballantrae, and very
little of it is used. With the current need for social distancing, the idea of having a common area for social
gatherings is becoming a thing of the past. He believes that it is important that this transitional product
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 18 of 20
offer walkability, along with some common area. He appreciates the Commission’s input as they proceed
with the future plan that will be shared with the Commission.
Communications
Public Comments
Ms. Husak stated that the following two public comments were received, which were not related to a
specific case.
Dr. Reeve Brenner, 303 Bradley Avenue, Rockville, Maryland:
“We ask that you look into Bankshot.com for play courts servicing the needs of the differently abled. See
Bankshot.com in connection with a distancing participation so important at a time of the virus. Our satellite
offices are in Cleveland and our fabrication also is in Cleveland. You might wish to check out the national
association for recreational equality. The underserved special communities will be the beneficiaries of 301
309 0260. There are hundreds of Bankshot facilities all over the country. One of the parks, playgrounds or
sports recreation centers could provide a Bankshot facility for the community.”
Joseph Raccuia, 5507 Classic Ct., Dublin, OH:
“I have raised my family in Dublin at the same residence for a total of 35 years. I just listened to the
Commission’s August 20, 2020 meeting and felt compelled to write this letter particularly concerning the
segment on “Residential Development Patterns”. It is alarming to me that the Dublin PZC would seriously
utilizing demographic trends for guidance in future development approvals. Some of the members
suggested talking with “experts” like university professors who, for the majority, live in urban settings, or
with associations funded by developers that put on seminars taught by “volunteers.” Please do not
misunderstand me, I think what Claudia Husak’s presentation was very timely. It points out a lack of vision
and leadership that has prompted me to write this letter. Ms. Husak is asking for your guidance and she is
pointing out an alarming trend of forgetting Dublin’s quality of life and following what home developers are
saying. They are commission-based sales people convincing homebuyers to buy into the high-density trend,
so they must be right. They are even using demographics as a sales pitch. Higher and higher lot coverage
means more profits! I recall in the late 70’s and early 80’s, the demographics pointed to a shortage in hotel
space, so developers built more and more hotels, which led to a glut of poor quality hotels. Following Ms.
Husak’s presentation, your commission should have discussed how these recent approvals -- Oak Park,
Tartan Ridge, Autumn Rose and Hamlet on Jerome -- affect our quality of life in Dublin. How do they affect
our schools, existing property values, law enforcement, living in concert with natural environs, green views,
access to health services and food services? Then following that discussion, you should be asking how to
improve the quality of life in Dublin. Ms. Husak mentioned side-loaded garages with the Webb development.
She stated how fast the Pulte development was sold out, without high density. She also commented on
empty nesters (which my wife and I are) wanting an HOA to take care of their yard. She did not say that
empty nesters do not want to give up their quality of life, especially in concert with nature and green views,
at a time in their life when they have the free time to enjoy it. In closing, I am not against high density,
but its place is in an urban setting where people can walk or a ccess mass transit, and automobile ownership
is almost non-existent. Mixing high density with the automobile will not keep Dublin green! Please look for
ways that guidance can improve the Dublin quality of life.”
Ms. Call stated that the first public comment is a good reminder of the needs of a differently abled body of
people; however, the second comment relates to the last case di scussed this evening. Commissioners share
the writer’s concern. We believe there is a place for density, but we try to be aware of how any of the
developments affect the quality of life in Dublin.
Virtual Meeting Format
Mr. Grimes stated that with the use of the Webex meeting format tonight, there were issues with the audio.
It was difficult to hear others. If this is the typical Webex experience, he prefers the Zoom meeting format.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 19 of 20
Ms. Husak stated that Planning staff is working with I.T. staff to identify the best meeting process. I.T. is
attempting to support these meetings to the best of their ability, and we are attempting to reciprocate.
Ms. Call stated that it is important to make sure the names of meeting participants shown are correct to
avoid an incorrect meeting record.
Future Meeting Topics
Mr. Supelak requested a future meeting provide a refresher on the private versus public paths issue, so
that Commissioners have a better understanding. For example, the OSU hospital site’s private paths were
to be connected to the City’s public pathway system, but the Muirfield Village private path is not. There
are some stipulations of which the members need better understanding.
Ms. Call stated that along the City’s public roadways, there should be an adjacent public path. However, in
the Muirfield Village area, there is no public path adjacent to the roadway. There is no public path to walk
from her home to Glick Road.
Mr. Fishman stated that the paths within Muirfield Village are private paths that are privately maintained.
The City does not maintain that community’s paths. However, the path on the perimeter of Muirfield Village
along the roadway is a public path. The path within the community deliberately does not join the public
path, although there is usually a way for the residents to reach the public path. The paths intentionally are
kept separate for liability purposes. It is similar to a gated community, whose paths are also private.
Muirfield Village’s roads are public, but its paths are private. Its common area is also private, maintained
exclusively by the HOA.
Ms. Call stated that Muirfield Village extends from Brand Road to Glick Road, so that is a lengthy area for
there to be no public path.
Mr. Fishman responded that the path along the perimeter of Muirfield Village is a public path as is the path
along Glick Road. All of the paths that are not within the neighborhood itself are public paths. The only
private paths are internal to the neighborhood.
Ms. Call stated that if an individual wished to walk from Brand Road to Donegal Cliffs, they would need to
walk up Muirfield Road to Glick Road and then down Dublin Road to Donegal Cliffs. Because of the size of
Muirfield Village, a walk around its perimeter is 6 miles.
Mr. Fishman stated that the streets in Muirfield are public, so one could walk along those. Another reason
the paths within Muirfield Village are private is that many of them are not adjacent to the street; they
extend through homeowners’ back yards. The paths must be posted as private per insurance requirements.
If a person had an accident on a Muirfield Village private path, there would be a liability issue for Muirfield
Village. The commercial areas in Muirfield Village are accessible by the public path, however, including the
Morgan House. That would be consistent with making the OSU Hospital accessible to the public.
Continued Discussion of Higher Density Development
Ms. Fox stated that she believes Council would like to know where and when the Commission believes
higher density could be permitted, and what the tradeoffs or conditions for that density must be. She would
like the Commission to continue that conversation and develop guidelines for future Planning and Zoning
Commissioners.
Ms. Husak responded that not much land remains in the community for residential infill purposes.
Mr. Supelak noted that although he thought the number of units in the proposed development tonight were
too much, 30+ units would be small in comparison to some other developments. Therefore, it is a little
more agreeable than with a large neighborhood. The Commission is cautious of requests for higher-density
developments, so there would be value in having stipulations or conditions when considering.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 17, 2020
Page 20 of 20
Ms. Husak stated that staff would schedule the topics mentioned tonight for some upcoming meeting
discussions.
Ms. Rauch reported that the next regularly scheduled PZC meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 1 at
6:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Rebecca Call
Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission
Judith K. Beal
Deputy Clerk of Council