Resolution 024-20RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045
Resolution No. 24-20 Passed
,20
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE PLAT FOR
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND
SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, application for approval of the plat for University Boulevard Phase 2 has
been made under Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the plat application has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, which has recommended approval and acceptance of the plat; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the reports of staff, and the subdivision requirements of Chapter
152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin, and desires to approve said plat
and accept all rights of way, easements, and other interests dedicated to the City
therein.
NOW1 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of
Ohio, 1 of the elected members concurring that:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and accepts the plat for University
Boulvard Phase 2, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The City Manager, Law Director, Clerk of Council, and any other required
City employee or official are authorized to execute the plat on behalf of the City.
Section I Pursuant to Section 4.04 of the Charter, this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon passage.
Passed this -k-day of a, , 2020.
//.0000/
Mayor — Presiding Officer
ATTEST,
Clerk of Council
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017-1090
of Dublin Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager
Date: April 7, 2020
Initiated By: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planning Director
Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner/Current Planning Manager
Memo
Re: Resolution 24-20 - Accepting the plat for University Boulevard Phase 2 right-of-
way dedication and subdivision.
Summary
This is a request, as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, to accept the
subdivision of ±101 acres for five commercial lots currently zoned ID -1, Research Office District
and PUD, Planned Unit Development District (OSU Wexner Medical Center) and to create the right-
of-way for University Boulevard from Shier -Rings Road to the intersection with Eiterman Road. The
preliminary plat was accepted by City Council on November 11, 2019 with the approval of a
variance to the Subdivision Regulations for the minimum size of Lot 5.
Process
As provided by the Law Director's Office, when City Council approves Preliminary and Final Plats,
the platting process is solely for the subdivision of the properties to identify property lines,
establish easements, provide open space dedication, and create public rights-of-way. The site
layout, architectural character, and open space design for the development are approved
separately by the required reviewing bodies.
Staff has recently been made aware that Franklin County changed submission requirements for
plats to require "specific legislative reference" by the municipality. This requirement came about
due to problems with documenting transfers when the plats were not approved with a legislative
number. While Dublin has approved plats via motion as far back as the 1980s, this new
requirement will change the acceptance of plats moving forward and will be implemented city-
wide, regardless of County.
Background
The site consists of ±101 acres with approximately 2,350 feet of frontage along Shier -Rings Road.
The area was annexed to the City in 2004 (Ord. 47-04) and 1996 (Ord. 64-96) and the City of
Dublin purchased the parcels for economic development purposes in 2016 and 2018. All of the
parcels were rezoned in 2011 from R, Rural District and R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential
District to ID -1, Research/Office District as part of an ongoing effort to aid in the implementation
of the long-term vision of this area as an important Economic Advancement Zone and Innovation
Memo re: Resolution 24-20 - Plat Acceptance of University Boulevard Phase 2
April 7, 2020
Page 2 of 3
District. Most recently, an area of approximately 34 acres was rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District (Ordinance 53-19) on November 4, 2019 and the preliminary plat was
accepted by City Council at the same time (Resolution 59-19). Lot 2 will be transferred to the OSU
Wexner Medical Center per an adopted Economic Development Agreement (Ordinance 08-19) for
their new facility.
The proposal is to create five new commercial lots on a new public street, University Boulevard.
The OSU Wexner Medical Center has filed for a Final Development Plan application for the first of
two phases of development, which will require review and approval by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. To comply with the Development Agreement with OSU, the City of Dublin is
advancing the final plat to create the parcel to be conveyed to OSU at this time. The City is
requesting the approval of the preliminary plat in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations.
Description
The proposed preliminary plat includes a new public street, University Boulevard, intersecting with
Shier -Rings Road and extending west to Eiterman Road, providing access to all of the proposed
lots. Cosgray Creek will be relocated to accommodate the new roadway and development parcels.
The creek will be in a conservation easement along the north side of Shier -Rings Road and along
the western property line of the city -owned land.
Zoning and Lot Details
The final plat includes the following five commercial lots:
• Lot 1 will be ±14 acres and is in the northwestern portion of the site. The lot will be located
north of proposed University Boulevard and south of the Sutphen site.
• Lot 2 will be approximately 34 acres and is the largest lot in the preliminary plat. The lot is
located south of U.S. 33 and north of University Boulevard. This lot is subject to a future
final development plan application to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
That application has been submitted to staff for review and includes paths that extend from
the public right-of-way into the site as requested by the Commission. The paths meander
off Lot 2 along the east and west boundaries and the City and OSU will work to address
maintenance of these areas in the future.
• Lot 3 is ±16.4 acres and located south of U.S. 33 and north of where University Boulevard
extends west off Shier -Rings Road.
• Lot 4 is ±24.3 acres and proposed on the south side of University Boulevard, north of
Shier -Rings Road. This lot will include the relocation of Cosgray Creek to accommodate the
new roadway. The creek will be in a conservation easement along the north side of Shier -
Rings Road, which is included on the final plat. In the future, this lot will also accommodate
the AEP transmission line and poles, which are proposed to run along the south side of
University Boulevard. An easement will be created for the lines in the future.
• Lot 5 is 1.38 -acre and is a remnant of the 15.6 -acre parcel in the northwest portion of the
site, created through the dedication of the right-of-way and intersection with Eiterman
Road.
All lots meet all Zoning Code requirements except Lot 5. This lot is a residual of land based on
the geometric layout of University Boulevard and the city -owned property boundaries. City
Council approved a variance through the platting process for this lot in accordance with
§152.110 at the acceptance of the preliminary plat on November 4, 2019.
Memo re: Resolution 24-20 - Plat Acceptance of University Boulevard Phase 2
April 7, 2020
Page 3 of 3
streets
Access to the proposed lots will be provided from Shier -Rings and Eiterman Roads via a new
public street, University Boulevard. University Boulevard will be an arterial street with four
travel lanes (2 in each direction). Bike lanes (5 feet in width) are included with the roadway as
required in the adopted Bicycle Advisory Task Force recommendations. This section of
University Boulevard will tie into the existing section near S.R. 161, opposite of Industrial
Parkway, in the future.
A shared -use path is located along the south side of the Shier -Rings Road frontage and will
connect to a path on the south side of University Boulevard. A sidewalk will be installed on the
north side of University Boulevard and the widened section of existing Shier -Rings Road. This
will connect into the path system on Avery Road.
The Subdivision Regulations require a right-of-way width of 100 feet for a boulevard, and the
applicant is proposing a right-of-way width of 100 feet. The Subdivision Regulations also
require a minimum curvature radius from the centerline of 400 feet for an arterial or collector
streets. The proposed preliminary plat shows a curvature radius of 800 feet and over for
University Boulevard. These exceed the minimums in the Subdivision Regulations for an
arterial/boulevard roadway.
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
On March 5, 2020, the Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council of the
final plat with the below condition:
1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made
prior to City Council submittal.
The applicant has met the condition for the plat.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of Resolution 24-20 for the variance to the Subdivision Regulations
and the Final Plat for University Boulevard Phase 2 at the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting.
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military
Survey Number 3452, containing 101.440 acres of land, more or less, said 101.440 acres
being comprised of all of those tracts of land conveyed to CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO by
deeds of record in Instrument Numbers 201607070086744, 201607070086746 and
201812180170863, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio.
The undersigned, CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO, an Ohio muncipal corporation, by
DANA McDANIEL, City Manager, owner of the lands platted herein, duly authorized in
the premises, does hereby certify that this plat correctly represents its "UNIVERSITY
BOULEVARD PHASE 2", a subdivision containing Lots numbered 1 thru 5, both
inclusive, does hereby accept this plat of same and dedicates to public use, as such, all of
Shier Rings Road and University Boulevard shown hereon and not heretofore dedicated.
The undersigned further agrees that any use or improvements on this land shall be in
conformity with all existing valid zoning, platting, health or other lawful rules and
regulations, including applicable off-street parking and loading requirements of the City
of Dublin, Ohio, for the benefit of itself and all other subsequent owners or assigns taking
title from, under or through the undersigned.
Easements are hereby reserved in, over and under areas designated on this plat as
"Easement", "Drainage Easement" or "Path Easement." Each of the aforementioned
designated easements permit the construction, operation, and maintenance of all public
and quasi public utilities above, beneath, and on the surface of the ground and, where
necessary, are for the construction, operation, and maintenance of service connections to
all adjacent lots and lands and for storm water drainage. Within those areas designated
"Drainage Easement" on this plat, an additional easement is hereby reserved for the
purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining major storm water drainage swales
and/or other above ground storm water drainage facilities. No above grade structures,
dams or other obstructions to the flow of storm water runoff are permitted within
Drainage Easement areas as delineated on this plat unless approved by the Dublin City
Engineer. Within those areas designated "Path Easement" on this plat, an additional
easement is hereby reserved for the construction and maintenance of a path and sidewalk
for use by the public.
In Witness Whereof, DANA McDANIEL, City Manager of CITY OF DUBLIN,
OHIO, has hereunto set his hand this day of , 20
Signed and Acknowledged
In the presence of:
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN ss:
CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
DANA McDANIEL,
City Manager
Before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared DANA
McDANIEL, City Manager of CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO, who acknowledged the
signing of the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed and the voluntary act
and deed of CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO for the uses and purposes expressed herein.
In Witness Thereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this
_ day of 120
My commission expires
Notary Public, State of Ohio
Approved this Day of
20 Director of Land Use and Long
Range Planning,
Dublin, Ohio
Approved this Day of
20 City Engineer, Dublin, Ohio
Approved this day of '20 , by resolution , by vote
of Council, wherein all of Shier Rings Road and University Boulevard are accepted as such
by the Council of the City of Dublin, Ohio.
In Witness Thereof I have hereunto
set my hand and affixed my seal this Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
day of 120
Transferred this day of
20
Filed for record this day of
20 at M. Fee S
File No.
Recorded this day of
20
Plat Book , Pages
Auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
Deputy Auditor, Franklin County, Ohio
Recorder, Franklin County, Ohio
Deputy Recorder, Franklin County, Ohio
m
LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND DRAWING
NOT TO SCALE
*10Rkv011MIll Kv
BASIS OF BEARINGS: The bearings shown hereon are
based on the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone,
as per NAD83 (1986 Adjustment). Control for bearings was
from coordinates of monuments FCGS 5536 and FCGS 7752,
established by the Franklin County Engineering Department,
using Global Positioning System procedures and equipment,
and having a bearing of North 850 37'06" East for a portion of
the centerline of Shier Rings Road.
SOURCE OF DATA: The sources of recorded survey data
referenced in the plan and text of this plat are the records of the
Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio.
IRON PINS: Iron pins, where indicated hereon, unless
otherwise noted, are to be set and are iron pipes, thirteen
sixteenths inch inside diameter, thirty inches long with a
plastic plug placed in the top end bearing the initials EMHT
INC.
PERMANENT MARKERS: Permanent markers, where
indicated hereon, are to be one -inch diameter, thirty -inch
long, solid iron pins. Pins are to be set to monument the points
indicated, and set with the top end flush with the surface of
the ground and then capped with an aluminum cap stamped
EMHT INC. Once installed, the top of the cap shall be
marked (punched) to record the actual location of the point.
SURVEYED & PLATTED
BY
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists
5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054
Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648
emht.com
We do hereby certify that we have surveyed the
above premises, prepared the attached plat, and that
said plat is correct. All dimensions are in feet and
decimal parts thereof.
O = Iron Pin (See Survey Data)
• = MAG Nail to be set
QO = Permanent Marker (See Survey Data)
♦ = Railroad Spike found
Professional Surveyor No. 7865
Date
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 20181446
ANTHONY DIOFFRE
JOHN DIOFFRE
PARCEL 2
.N. 200203080060772
.N. 200301 31 0031 944
See Sheet 3
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2
TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, OHIO
.N. 200402030024250p
0
II
LJ
U
V)
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
30
DELTA
60 120
\ \
N N
(in
Line Type Legend
10'33'15"
360.00'
66.31'
S 38'32'17" E
90 c2S \\
5) co
2'56'28"
Existing Property Line
io
\
41.06'
C3
2'28'46"
\
34.62'
Existing R/W Line
34.62'
\\
0'27'42"
Existing R/W Centerline
6.44'
\
6.44'
C5
5'48'52"
\Ease
merit
See Sheet
Existing Easement Line
o
N
\
\
4
500.00'
75.44'
\ \
75.37'
Proposed Subdivision Boundary Line
10'06'54"
\ \
42.37'
Proposed Lot Line
42.31'
\
\
35'39'33"
240.00'
149.37'
X26
146.97'
Proposed R/W Line
\ \
\ \ \
181.93'
S 18'47'00" E
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
12'16'35"
Proposed R/W Centerline
P
\
\
534.64'
C11
21'16'15"
\\,
98ss. ca
519.74'
Proposed Easement Line
516.76'
s f \ �\
40'13'49"
1125.00'
789.92'
S 71'00'06" E
773.79'
C13
7'43'36"
1125.00'
151.71'
S 54'44'59" E
t00
\ \
1........: S>2' \ \ \
N31'07'27"E
1125.00'
Ol
Og• -,
\ \•h ?6 f 8707
I
9.80'
C15
w
o \ \
C30 S>2.5
N 49'54'05" E
140.33'
Ip \ CZ7
15_Easement moi 00>e8
- .90•
29 9
315.00'
217.21'
IN
m m \ \ \
C28 C c><
C17
19'07'13"
IJ
/ e
46 J 502'05'28"W
S 53'22'31" E
33.22'
C18
oyeF
F. 16.31'
82.00'
TOWNSHIP OF
WASHINGTON, OHIO
.N. 200402030024250p
0
II
LJ
U
V)
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
30
DELTA
60 120
GRAPHIC
SCALE
(in
feet)
I� I
N
N85' 41' 49"E
769.53'
FCGS 775
L
Drainage Easement I ' I . : in r
n�
S9
i rt= s v>2.0g �T YBO SS. v
II I Ease26
me v•f 23600 -& ��1/ 15 f
I s
\
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
Cl
10'33'15"
360.00'
66.31'
S 38'32'17" E
66.22'
C2
2'56'28"
800.00'
41.06'
S 45'17'08" E
41.06'
C3
2'28'46"
800.00'
34.62'
S 45'03'17" E
34.62'
C4
0'27'42"
800.00'
6.44'
S 46'31'31" E
6.44'
C5
5'48'52"
2500.00'
253.70'
S 49'39'48" E
253.59'
C6
8'38'40"
500.00'
75.44'
S 45'47'26" W
75.37'
C7
10'06'54"
240.00'
42.37'
S 36'24'39" W
42.31'
C8
35'39'33"
240.00'
149.37'
N 13'31'26" E
146.97'
C9
2857'18"
360.00'
181.93'
S 18'47'00" E
180.00'
C10
12'16'35"
2500.00'
535.66'
S 66'01'09" E
534.64'
C11
21'16'15"
1400.00'
519.74'
N 61'31'19" W
516.76'
C12
40'13'49"
1125.00'
789.92'
S 71'00'06" E
773.79'
C13
7'43'36"
1125.00'
151.71'
S 54'44'59" E
151.60'
C14
32'30'13"
1125.00'
638.21'
S 74'51'54" E
629.68'
C15
3754'42"
216.00'
142.92'
N 49'54'05" E
140.33'
C16
39'30'34"
315.00'
217.21'
S 24'03'38" E
212.94'
C17
19'07'13"
100.00'
33.37'
S 53'22'31" E
33.22'
C18
4647'01"
82.00'
66.96'
N 391 W
65.11'
C19
30'36'16"
50.00'
26.71'
S 31'27'14" E
26.39'
C20
7'03'21"
2451.50'
301.90'
S 50'17'03" E
301.71'
C21
4'34'38"
2551.50'
203.83'
S 49'02'41" E
203.77'
C22
2710'29"
166.00'
78.73'
N 60'20'37" W
78.00'
C23
56'10'45"
46.00'
45.10'
S 77'58'47" W
43.32'
C24
54'11'46"
195.00'
184.45'
S 22'47'31" W
177.65'
C25
2'35'48"
2451.50'
111.10'
S 60'24'13" E
111.09'
\ \\ >g 56 f \\1 v
S>2.0926 f 3 \ \ h m
9. >
00 \\ l l�
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
C26
10'27'20"
2451.50'
447.36'
S 66'55'46" E
446.74'
C27
10'05'20"
480.00'
84.52'
S 77'12'06" E
84.41'
C28
11'07'30"
637.33'
123.75'
N 891 E
123.56'
C29
40'12'28"
28.00'
19.65'
N 62'49'53" E
19.25'
C30
8'45'54"
78.00'
11.93'
N 38'20'42" E
11.92'
C31
41'37'36"
63.00'
45.77'
S 20'08'01" E
44.77'
C32
10'10'28"
1448.50'
257.22'
N 67'04'12" W
256.88'
C33
6'29'49"
1459.50'
165.50'
N 58'17'28" W
165.41'
C34
9'32'50"
478.40'
79.72'
S 70'56'52" E
79.62'
C35
5729'05"
23.00'
23.08'
N 75'32'10" E
22.12'
C36
4'52'35"
23.00'
1.96'
N 44'21'20" E
1.96'
C37
40'29'32"
58.00'
40.99'
S 05'53'07" E
40.14'
C38
17'10'56"
100.00'
29.99'
S 34'43'22" E
29.88'
C39
24'17'20"
1076.50'
456.35'
S 77'26'57" E
452.94'
C40
43'16'03"
180.00'
135.93'
N 64'03'47" E
132.72'
C41
2712'07"
1348.50'
522.54'
N 61'03'23" W
519.28'
C42
9.44'21"
477.00'
81.08'
N 77'01'37" W
80.98'
C43
8'14'55"
190.00'
27.35'
N 86'01'14" W
27.33'
C44
8'24'17"
480.00'
70.41'
S 85'39'10" W
70.35'
C45
59'07'46"
110.00'
113.52'
S 68'59'06" E
108.55'
C46
11'29'33"
2551.50'
511.78'
S 66'24'40" E
510.93'
C47
12'23'15"
3989.53'
862.54'
S 69'42'00" E
860.86'
C48
0'36'07"
3989.53'
41.91'
S 63'12'20" E
41.91'
C49
0'53'05"
4325.23'
66.79'
S 46'39'56" E
66.79'
.... S8539'48 w ivy. L 23AW---, \ \
585'39'48"`W 20.00 1 \
40.81' I 1 -A I \ \ \ s
s'6p�!: \ \ eet S
p1
4
5 C44 C43 \ I I \ \
S81'S3'47"E
41.61' C42 a C32\\
o I
_4I II o I II 15' Easement \ \ \
o I I \ S> \ \ N73'52'50"E
o I I1 I I \ •0g 26' 15.73'
� U!
e
011 Io3o \\\\ �O• \\me�f
� �� S \ \ Mme: :•ham \\
NII I m Semens
r\
I \
24 377 A I R \
z
OTD
Z
O
\\
\
I
m � I o
7:
a U1 N
N If
II
\
\
\
0 P
\
00
n
�
w
C C
\
I II
c.I � I%
'l "
\\
\
I
m � I o
7:
a U1 N
N If
II
\
\
\
3 o ��
\
B�
I I
\
0/
y�
I
Easement
I
Drainage
a
m ( S29'31'17'W
I
I
3 v I (`20.50'
S0700'O6'W
20.50'
iom� I
N 1''
I
bis I
O I w
i63 p N9/ I
0
of J _---
_I 1 15' Pah-_--_-- ---- ----___-J- N-857 36758"E 252.50'
m
N Easeme
JI `sN_
dt
N85'36'58"E 1040.54'- - -
Path
Easement__- __
S>751 Og. _ - - - - _ _ N85'36'58"E 1136.02
_----
�rn
W
__--------
nt
Z ------ _----------- ENstFng Gas28aseme2L
CITY OF DUBLIN
0106050124309
� 8
34.16'
NOI N4.16
Io 0
N oloN
D I O N W
Irtal m
L_ J
O
VI
S85'36'58"W
26.52'
_- _ -__-_ _- 62'Sj/ / eCL
_ - -- - �c�tstlna Gas Easement O F,o
19
5.00'
w
Ut
- -- - --- -- - ---- �I<
- ---- - <
Ln
-__-- ----- 1487.67' - U W
_ - _ - - u, O
_ _--------------------------- - CITY OF DUBLIN W _
--------------------------- SHIER RINGS ROAD - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
s85'41'49"W 1665.26' I N• 20010815
0188923
20 as defined by rru,w- -
�oEngineers survey pint dated 10-31-13 CITY OF
D I B EI N -
r� ROS nninp,090184340 - - -\
VMS 3452 0- SHIER I• N
VMS 4353 Property Line -
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 20181446
I
I
°F
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
A
I�
W
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Line Type Legend
IUNIVERSITY BOULEVARD P ASE 2 Existing Property Line
I Existing R/W Line
30 20 10 D 30 60 120
GRAPHIC SCALE (in feet)
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
RADIUS
LENGTH
C26
CHORD
BEARING
2451.50'
CHORD
DISTANCE
360.00'
66.31'
S
38'32'17"
E
66.22'
800.00'
41.06'
S
45'17'08"
E
41.06'
800.00'
34.62'
S
45'03'17"
E
34.62'
800.00'
6.44'
S
46'31'31"
E
6.44'
2500.00'
253.70'
S
49'39'48"
E
253.59'
500.00'
75.44'
S
4547'26"
W
75.37'
240.00'
42.37'
S
3624'39"
W
42.31'
240.00'
149.37'
N
13'31'26"
E
146.97'
360.00'
181.93'
S
18'47'00"
E
180.00'
2500.00'
535.66'
S
66'01'09"
E
534.64'
1400.00'
519.74'
N
61'31'19"
W
516.76'
1125.00'
789.92'
S
71'00'06"
E
773.79'
1125.00'
151.71'
S
5444'59"
E
151.60'
1125.00'
638.21'
S
74'51'54"
E
629.68'
216.00'
142.92'
N
49'54'05"
E
140.33'
315.00'
217.21'
S
24'03'38"
E
212.94'
100.00'
33.37'
S
53'22'31"
E
33.22'
82.00'
66.96'
N
39'32'37"
W
65.11'
50.00'
26.71'
S
31'27'14"
E
26.39'
2451.50'
301.90'
S
50'17'03"
E
301.71'
2551.50'
203.83'
S
49'02'41"
E
203.77'
166.00'
78.73'
N
60'20'37"
W
78.00'
46.00'
45.10'
S
7758'47"
W
43.32'
195.00'
184.45'
S
2247'31"
W
177.65'
2451.50'
111.10'
S
60'24'13"
E
111.09'
Existing R/W Centerline
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Subdivision Boundary Line
Proposed Lot Line
Proposed R/W Line
Proposed R/W Centerline
Proposed Easement Line
NOTE "A" - MINIMUM SETBACKS: City of Dublin
zoning regulations for University Boulevard Phase 2 in effect
at the time of platting are established per chapter 153 of the
City of Dublin Code of Ordinances.
Said zoning regulations and any amendments thereto passed
subsequent to acceptance of this plat, should be reviewed to
determine the then current requirements. This notice is solely
for the purpose of notifying the public of the existence, at the
time of platting, of certain zoning regulations applicable to this
property. This notice shall not be interpreted as creating plat
or subdivision restrictions, private use restrictions, covenants
running with the land or title encumbrances of any nature, and
is for informational purposes only.
NOTE "B" : At the time of platting, all of University
Boulevard Phase 2 is in Zone X (areas determined to be
outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) as said zone is
designated and delineated on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate
Map for Franklin County, Ohio and Incorporated Areas, Map
Number 39049CO131 K, with effective date of June 17, 2008.
NOTE "C" - ACREAGE BREAKDOWN: University
Boulevard Phase 2 is comprised of the following Franklin
County Parcel Numbers:
273-008174
273-008175
273-008176
274-001114
274-001115
NOTE "D" - ACREAGE BREAKDOWN:
Total acreage
Acreage in right-of-way
Acreage in remaining Lots
15.567 Ac.
9.329 Ac.
2.820 Ac.
55.522 Ac.
18.202 Ac.
101.440 Ac.
11.402 Ac.
90.038 Ac.
NOTE "E": At the time of platting, electric, cable, and
telephone service providers have not issued information
required so that easement areas, in addition to those shown on
this plat as deemed necessary by these providers for the
installation and maintenance of all of their main line facilities,
could conveniently be shown on this plat. Existing recorded
easement information about University Boulevard Phase 2 or
any part thereof can be acquired by a competent examination
of the then current public records, including those in the
Franklin County Recorder's Office.
NOTE "F": Lots 1, 2 and 3, as designated and delineated
hereon, are subject to the terms and conditions described in the
existing Declaration of Reciprocal Easements, of record in
Instrument Number
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
C26
10'27'20"
2451.50'
447.36'
S 6655'46" E
446.74'
C27
10'05'20"
480.00'
84.52'
S 77'12'06" E
84.41'
C28
11'07'30"
637.33'
123.75'
N 89'25'29" E
123.56'
C29
40'12'28"
28.00'
19.65'
N 62'49'53" E
19.25'
C30
845'54"
78.00'
11.93'
N 38'20'42" E
11.92'
C31
41'37'36"
63.00'
45.77'
S 20'08'01" E
44.77'
C32
10'10'28"
1448.50'
257.22'
N 67'04'12" W
256.88'
C33
6'29'49"
1459.50'
165.50'
N 58'17'28" W
165.41'
C34
9'32'50"
478.40'
79.72'
S 70'56'52" E
79.62'
C35
57'29'05"
23.00'
23.08'
N 75'32'10" E
22.12'
C36
452'35"
23.00'
1.96'
N 44'21'20" E
1.96'
C37
40'29'32"
58.00'
40.99'
S 05'53'07" E
40.14'
C38
17'10'56"
100.00'
29.99'
S 3443'22" E
29.88'
C39
24'17'20"
1076.50'
456.35'
S 7726'57" E
452.94'
C40
43'16'03"
180.00'
135.93'
N 64'03'47" E
132.72'
C41
22'12'07"
1348.50'
522.54'
N 61'03'23" W
519.28'
C42
9'44'21"
477.00'
81.08'
N 77'01'37" W
80.98'
C43
8'14'55"
190.00'
27.35'
N 86'01'14" W
27.33'
C44
824'17"
480.00'
70.41'
S 85'39'10" W
70.35'
C45
59'07'46"
110.00'
113.52'
S 68'59'06" E
108.55'
C46
11'29'33"
2551.50'
511.78'
S 6624'40" E
510.93'
C47
12'23'15"
3989.53'
862.54'
S 69'42'00" E
860.86'
C48
0'36'07"
3989.53'
41.91'
S 63'12'20" E
41.91'
C49
0'53'05"
4325.23'
66.79'
S 46'39'56" E
66.79'
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 20181446
M
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2
w
ChBrg=S69'23'57wE
74ch=902.51'U.2. ROUTE 11
15' Easement
872'09'26"E 97.01' C27
CIO
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
Cl
10'33'15"
360.00'
66.31'
S 38'32'17" E
66.22'
C2
2'56'28"
800.00'
41.06'
S 45'17'08" E
41.06'
C3
2'28'46"
800.00'
34.62'
S 45'03'17" E
34.62'
C4
0'27'42"
800.00'
6.44'
S 46'31'31" E
6.44'
C5
5'48'52"
2500.00'
253.70'
S 49'39'48" E
253.59'
C6
8'38'40"
500.00'
75.44'
S 45'47'26" W
75.37'
C7
10'06'54"
240.00'
42.37'
S 36'24'39" W
42.31'
C8
35'39'33"
240.00'
149.37'
N 13'31'26" E
146.97'
C9
28'57'18"
360.00'
181.93'
S 18'47'00" E
180.00'
C10
12'16'35"
2500.00'
535.66'
S 66'01'09" E
534.64'
C11
21'16'15"
1400.00'
519.74'
N 61'31'19" W
516.76'
C12
40'13'49"
1125.00'
789.92'
S 71'00'06" E
773.79'
C13
7'43'36"
1125.00'
151.71'
S 5444'59" E
151.60'
C14
32'30'13"
1125.00'
638.21'
S 74'51'54" E
629.68'
C15
37'54'42"
216.00'
142.92'
N 49'54'05" E
140.33'
C16
39'30'34"
315.00'
217.21'
S 24'03'38" E
212.94'
C17
19'07'13"
100.00'
33.37'
S 53'22'31" E
33.22'
0
00
V_
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
C18
46'47'01"
82.00'
66.96'
N 39'32'37" W
65.11'
C19
30'36'16"
50.00'
26.71'
S 31'27'14" E
26.39'
C20
7'03'21"
2451.50'
301.90'
S 50'17'03" E
301.71'
C21
434'38"
2551.50'
203.83'
S 49'02'41" E
203.77'
C22
27'10'29"
166.00'
78.73'
N 60'20'37" W
78.00'
C23
56'10'45"
46.00'
45.10'
S 77'58'47" W
43.32'
C24
54'11'46"
195.00'
184.45'
S 22'47'31" W
177.65'
C25
2'35'48"
2451.50'
111.10'
S 60'24'13" E
111.09'
C26
10'27'20"
2451.50'
447.36'
S 66'55'46" E
446.74'
C27
10'05'20"
480.00'
84.52'
S 7712'06" E
84.41'
C28
11'07'30"
637.33'
123.75'
N 89'25'29" E
123.56'
C29
40'12'28"
28.00'
19.65'
N 62'49'53" E
19.25'
C30
8'45'54"
78.00'
11.93'
N 38'20'42" E
11.92'
C31
41'37'36"
63.00'
45.77'
S 20'08'01" E
44.77'
C32
10'10'28"
1448.50'
257.22'
N 67'04'12" W
256.88'
C33
6'29'49"
1459.50'
165.50'
N 58'17'28" W
165.41'
C34
9'32'50"
478.40'
79.72'
S 70'56'52" E
79.62'
9
50'07"E 89.
- E {ing 10
- - Gas Easement
- - - - - D.B. 2861, P. 378
16.31
2
33.719 Ac.
See Note "F"
/ F n
s�,Ss'r S9s \
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD
S72'09'26"E
791.58' -
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
NO.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
C35
57'29'05"
23.00'
23.08'
N 75'32'10" E
22.12'
C36
452'35"
23.00'
1.96'
N 44'21'20" E
1.96'
C37
40'29'32"
58.00'
40.99'
S 05'53'07" E
40.14'
C38
17'10'56"
100.00'
29.99'
S 3443'22" E
29.88'
C39
24'17'20"
1076.50'
456.35'
S 77'26'57" E
452.94'
C40
43'16'03"
180.00'
135.93'
N 64'03'47" E
132.72'
C41
22'12'07"
1348.50'
522.54'
N 61'03'23" W
519.28'
C42
9'44'21"
477.00'
81.08'
N 77'01'37" W
80.98'
C43
8'14'55"
190.00'
27.35'
N 86'01'14" W
27.33'
C44
8'24'17"
480.00'
70.41'
S 85'39'10" W
70.35'
C45
59'07'46"
110.00'
113.52'
S 68'59'06" E
108.55'
C46
11'29'33"
2551.50'
511.78'
S 66'24'40" E
510.93'
C47
12'23'15"
3989.53'
862.54'
S 69'42'00" E
860.86'
C48
0'36'07"
3989.53'
41.91'
S 63'12'20" E
41.91'
C49
0'53'05"
4325.23'
66.79'
S 46'39'56" E
66.79'
Existing Communication
Easement
D.B. 3080, P. 325
3/4" iron
1
I\ pin found
1 _
V 3/4 iron
pin found
c
v
w F- y
0
SNI I w
5' Easement
? N
S72'09'26"E 300.42'
O --
C32 - -
9.60' --_ _
:o
00
See Sheet 2
Line Type Legend
Existing Property Line
Existing R/W Line
Existing R/W Centerline
Existing Easement Line
Proposed
Subdivision Boundary Line
Proposed
Lot Line
Proposed
R/W Line
Proposed
R/W Centerline
Proposed Easement Line
8
52'50"E
_
C33 `
j�
� \ \5, E
C11 UNI VE 9224' ement
RSITY�OU --
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 30 60 120
GRAPHIC SCALE (in feet)
b0
le
tp
cP > _
o
Easement/ /
S60-41 'a B7
34 .. 89.
20.41 G/
me"
17' EoSe
0\16
SXP
Sep
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 20181446
5
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD P ASE 2
5
0 U.S. R(DU'T, 33
J'P
L/A R/W
N J N8517 -03"E 598.94 _ _ _ - - - - 3/4" iron
- - - - - - pin found
Existing 10' Gas Easement
3/4' iron D.B. 2861, P. 378
pin found
0
II
w
J
Q
U
W
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 30 60 120
GRAPHIC SCALE (in feet)
a
d
m
N
d
N
z
0
o
w �
(�
Z Co
3
16.440 Ac.
See Note "F" O N z
a O, CD
/ 0 h� z
00 CD E
M z z
-
/NOS
/ C, / D
z
C34 / Foremen/ -�
% 36
2p 4t' G �I;F z Line Type Legend
F
Existing Property Line
\ 8117.47' Existing R/W Line
17.47'
\ S26'07'54"E z Existing R/W Centerline
24.150 Existing Easement Line
3 �oF
0
Proposed Subdivision Boundary Line
Proposed Lot Line
Proposed R/W Line
n \ 0 Proposed R/W Centerline
u°1i °M asemeni \
t w co a -------
o do �o _ _ Existing Gas Easement - Proposed Easement Line
o io ? ^ - I.N. 201202280027242
rn N C39 - - _ _ _ _ A
G; SHIER RINGS RO 7
4 AL -
v' N852T29�6,E FCGS 5420
3.89' VMS 3452 - 224.57'
CE as defined VMS 3004
G�'O by Franklin County -
G15 Engineers CL survey Plat - -
dated 10-31-13 g8527'29'W 685.07' T�T� T�
_ T r Q I I ONO �I�I�Il �� ROS_-
� << Property Line �, � I� 0 I 0 U U L� I V> \
885 41'49°MI 1665.26 N 'n- - - - - -
W W N. 20160803010- -
-----T-
CURVE TABLE
CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD CHORD
NO. BEARING DISTANCE
Cl
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
10'33'15"
360.00'
66.31'
S 38'32'17" E
66.22'
C2
2'56'28"
800.00'
41.06'
S 45'17'08" E
41.06'
C3
2'28'46"
800.00'
34.62'
S 45'03'17" E
34.62'
C4
0'27'42"
800.00'
6.44'
S 46'31'31" E
6.44'
C5
5'48'52"
2500.00'
253.70'
S 49'39'48" E
253.59'
C6
8'38'40"
500.00'
75.44'
S 45'47'26" W
75.37'
C7
10'06'54"
240.00'
42.37'
S 36'24'39" W
42.31'
C8
35'39'33"
240.00'
149.37'
N 13'31'26" E
146.97'
C9
28'57'18"
360.00'
181.93'
S 18'47'00" E
180.00'
C10
12'16'35"
2500.00'
535.66'
S 66'01'09" E
534.64'
C11
21'16'15"
1400.00'
519.74'
N 61'31'19" W
516.76'
C12
40'13'49"
1125.00'
789.92'
S 71'00'06" E
773.79'
C13
7'43'36"
1125.00'
151.71'
S 54'44'59" E
151.60'
C14
32'30'13"
1125.00'
638.21'
S 74'51'54" E
629.68'
C15
37'54'42"
216.00'
142.92'
N 49'54'05" E
140.33'
C16
39'30'34"
315.00'
217.21'
S 24'03'38" E
212.94'
C17
19'07'13"
100.00'
33.37'
S 53'22'31" E
33.22'
C18
46'47'01"
82.00'
66.96'
N 39'32'37" W
65.11'
C19
30'36'16"
50.00'
26.71'
S 31'27'14" E
26.39'
C20
7'03'21"
2451.50'
301.90'
S 50'17'03" E
301.71'
C21
4'34'38"
2551.50'
203.83'
S 49'02'41" E
203.77'
C22
27'10'29"
166.00'
78.73'
N 60'20'37" W
78.00'
C23
56'10'45"
46.00'
45.10'
S 77'58'47" W
43.32'
C24
54'11'46"
195.00'
184.45'
S 22'47'31" W
177.65'
C25
2'35'48"
2451.50'
111.10'
S 60'24'13" E
111.09'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
N0.
DELTA
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
BEARING
CHORD
DISTANCE
C26
10'27'20"
2451.50'
447.36'
S 66'55'46" E
446.74'
C27
10'05'20"
480.00'
84.52'
S 77'12'06" E
84.41'
C28
11'07'30"
637.33'
123.75'
N 89'25'29" E
123.56'
C29
40'12'28"
28.00'
19.65'
N 62'49'53" E
19.25'
C30
8'45'54"
78.00'
11.93'
N 38'20'42" E
11.92'
C31
41'37'36"
63.00'
45.77'
S 20'08'01" E
44.77'
C32
1010'28"
1448.50'
257.22'
N 67'04'12" W
256.88'
C33
6'29'49"
1459.50'
165.50'
N 58'17'28" W
165.41'
C34
9'32'50"
478.40'
79.72'
S 70'56'52" E
79.62'
C35
57'29'05"
23.00'
23.08'
N 75'32'10" E
22.12'
C36
4'52'35"
23.00'
1.96'
N 44'21'20" E
1.96'
C37
40'29'32"
58.00'
40.99'
S 05'53'07" E
40.14'
C38
17'10'56"
100.00'
29.99'
S 34'43'22" E
29.88'
C39
24'17'20"
1076.50'
456.35'
S 77'26'57" E
452.94'
C40
43'16'03"
180.00'
135.93'
N 64'03'47" E
132.72'
C41
22'12'07"
1348.50'
522.54'
N 61'03'23" W
519.28'
C42
9'44'21"
477.00'
81.08'
N 77'01'37" W
80.98'
C43
8'14'55"
190.00'
27.35'
N 86'01'14" W
27.33'
C44
8'24'17"
480.00'
70.41'
S 85'39'10" W
70.35'
C45
59'07'46"
110.00'
113.52'
S 68'59'06" E
108.55'
C46
11'29'33"
2551.50'
511.78'
S 66'24'40" E
510.93'
C47
12'23'15"
3989.53'
862.54'
S 69'42'00" E
860.86'
C48
0'36'07"
3989.53'
41.91'
S 63'12'20" E
41.91'
C49
0'53'05"
4325.23'
66.79'
S 46'39'56" E
66.79'
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 20181446
RECORD OF ACTION
City of
Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission
OHIO, USA Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
5. University Boulevard, Phase 2 6600 Shier Rings Road
20-027FP Final Plat
Proposal: A provision for a right-of-way for University Boulevard to extend from
Shier -Rings Road west to intersect with Eiterman Road and the creation
of five lots for development. The site is zoned ID -1, Research and
Development District, ID -2 Research Flex District and PUD, Planned Unit
Development District (OSU Wexner Medical Center Plan) in the West
Innovation District.
Location: North of Shier Rings Road, west of the intersection with Avery Road
Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Final Plat
under the provisions of Subdivision Regulations.
Applicant: Dana McDaniel, City Manager, City of Dublin
Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner, Current Planning Manager
Contact Information: 614.410.4675, chusak@dublin.oh.us
Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/20-027
MOTION: Mr. Grimes moved, Mr. Supelak seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the
Final Plat with the following condition:
1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made
prior to City Council submittal.
RESULT: The Final Plat was recommended for approval to City Council
.1;10101.1014 BILT1610 4-5
Kristina Kennedy
Yes
Mark Supelak
Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION
Rebecca Call
Yes
Leo Grimes
Yes
Claudia D. Husak, AICP
Senior Planner, Current Planning Manager
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2020
Page 14 of 15
[Motion passed 4-0]
5. University Boulevard , Shier Rings Road, 20-027 FP, Final Plat
A provision for a subdivision and the dedication of right-of-way for University Boulevard to extend
from Shier -Rings Road west to intersect with Eiterman Road and the creation of five lots for
development. The 101.4 -acre site is north of Shier Rings Road, west of the intersection with Avery
Road and zoned ID -1, Research and Development District, and PUD, Planned Unit Development
District (OSU Wesner Medical Center Plan) in the West Innovation District.
There was no public comment.
Mr. Grimes moved, Mr. Supelak seconded to recommend approval of the Final Plat to Council with
the following condition:
1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are
made prior to City Council submittal.
Vote: Mr. Supelak, yes; Mr. Grimes, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes.
[Motion passed 4-0]
COMMUNICATIONS
Staff reported the following:
• At the February 13 joint Council-PZC-ARB meeting, members discussed educational
opportunities for members. A recommendation from the joint meeting discussion was
that a tour of certain Dublin development sites be scheduled to improve members'
awareness. An email was sent to Commission members inquiring what sites the members
would like included in the tour. To date, only one response has been received. Remaining
members are encouraged to offer their suggestions, as well. Tour plans can be discussed
at the April 2, 2020 meeting, at which attendance of all Commission members is
anticipated.
Ms. Call noted that information helpful to have beforehand would be identification of which
of the tour sites are examples of development that, in retrospect, Council would either
encourage or discourage.
Mr. Grimes stated that it would be helpful to have any history or future direction anticipated
for the sites.
Ms. Call suggested that staff also point out any projects that resulted in future burden for
the City.
Commission members expressed a preference for a Friday afternoon tour date, more than
one date, if needed. Opportunities for self -guided tours could be beneficial to some members.
• Commission members are asked to provide updated personal contact information to staff
to ensure more timely exchange of information.
• Commission members expressed consensus for scheduling a future PZC meeting at 6:00
p.m. to permit a Dublin City Schools representative to address potential impact of new
zoning and development on School District planning efforts.
• The Central Ohio Planning and Zoning workshop is scheduled for Friday, May 8, 2020,
8:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. Commission members are encouraged to contact staff if they
would like to attend. The theme is "Creating Great Places."
• The National Planning Conference is scheduled Saturday, April 25 through Tuesday, April
28, 2020 in Houston, Texas. Any Commissioner interested in attending should contact
rCity of Planning and Zoning Commission
ublin March 5, 2020
OHIO. usn
20-027FP — University Boulevard, Phase 2
Summary
A request for review and
recommendation of approval to City
Council for a Final Plat to subdivide
approximately 101 acres for five
commercial lots currently zoned ID -
1, Research Office District and PUD,
Planned Unit Development District
and to create the right-of-way for
University Boulevard from Shier
Rings Road to the intersection with
Eiterman Road.
Site Location
North side of Shier Rings Road,
approximately 1,800 feet east of the
intersection with Avery Road.
Property Owner
City of Dublin
Zoning Map
Applicant/ Representative
Dana McDaniel, City Manager, City of Dublin
Applicable Land Use Regulations
Subdivision Regulations
Case Manager
Claudia Husak, AICP, Senior Planner/Current Planning Manager
(614) 410-4675
chusakadublin.oh.us
Next Steps
Upon recommendation of approval to City Council from the Planning and Zoning Commission for
the Final Plat, the application will be eligible for review by Council for final acceptance.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-027FP I University Boulevard, Phase 2
Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 Page 2 of 6
1. Content Map
20-027FP 0 250 500
Final Plat �
ItOf DUhllll University Boulevard Phase 2 Feet
,7 6600 Shier Rings Road
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-027FP I University Boulevard, Phase 2
Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 Page 3 of 6
2. Overview
Background
The site consists of five parcels with approximately 2,350 feet of frontage along Shier Rings
Road. The parcels were annexed to the City in 2004 (Ord. 47-04) and 1996 (Ord. 64-96) and
the City of Dublin purchased the parcels for economic development purposes in 2016 and 2018.
All of the parcels were rezoned in 2011 from R, Rural District and R-1, Restricted Suburban
Residential District to ID -1, Research/Office District as part of an on-going effort to aid in the
implementation of the long-term vision of this area as an important Economic Advancement
Zone and Innovation District.
A portion of the site was rezoned (Ordinance 53-19) on November 4, 2019 and the preliminary
plat was accepted by City Council at the same time (Resolution 59-19). Lot 2 will transferred to
the OSU Wexner Medical Center per an adopted Economic Development Agreement for their
new facility. As part of the acceptance of the preliminary plat by City Council a variance was
granted for Lot 5 to be less than the Code required three acres. The Planning and Zoning
Commission recommended approval to City Council of the rezoning with preliminary
development plan and the preliminary plat on September 19, 2019.
Site Characteristics
Natural Features
The site is currently vacant and contains minimal grade change from the northern portion of the
site to the southern portion of the site. A tree row exists along the existing alignment of
Cosgray Ditch. A farm drainage ditch "Cosgray Ditch" runs east/west through the center of the
western parcel, then turns south between the two southern parcels. The ditch is in a City
Stream Corridor Protection Zone, which the City intends to relocate to the south.
A portion of the north side of the site drains in the roadside ditches of U.S. 33. Trees also exist
near Shier Rings Road near the location of the former farmstead. The City and OSU have
performed detailed tree surveys and tree removal is scheduled prior to April 1, 2020 to comply
the Ohio Department of Natural Resources requirements. The City and OSU will replace
removed inches in accordance with the Zoning Code.
Wetlands were identified on the site. One is located along Eiterman Road near the shared
property line with the Sutphen Corporation and the other is near U.S. 33. The second one will
be impacted by the OSU development and is being mitigated with payment into a wetland bank.
Historic and Cultural Facilities
As part of the Rings Farmstead, a windmill structure will be salvaged by the City and there are
on-going investigations as to potential cemetery use in the northeast portion of the site, an area
which is not impacted by this plat or any future development proposal.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
North: US 33 and the Sutphen Corporation (Washington Township)
East: ID -1, Research/Office District (Avery Road Industrial Park, industrial and storage)
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-027FP I University Boulevard, Phase 2
Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 Page 4 of 6
South: PUD, the Ballantrae neighborhood the City of Dublin Service Center and TF, Tech Flex
District, City of Dublin Fleet Maintenance and Dublin City Schools Transportation
Department.
West: Washington Township (church) and ID -2, Research/Flex District (Washington Township
Administration building)
Road, Pedestrian and Bike Network
The site has frontage, but no direct access to US 33 to the north. A new transportation network
will be needed to access the site.
Utilities
The site is currently not served by public utilities.
Proposal
Summary
The proposed final plat includes a new public street, University Boulevard, intersecting with
Shier Rings Road and extending west to Eiterman Road, providing access to all of the proposed
lots. Cosgray Creek will be relocated to accommodate the new roadway and development
parcels. The creek will be in a conservation easement along the north side of Shier Rings Road
and along the western property line of the city -owned land.
Zoning and Lot Details
The final plat includes the following five commercial lots:
• Lot 1 will be 14 acres and is in the northwestern portion of the site. The lot will be
located north of proposed University Boulevard and south of the Sutphen site.
• Lot 2 will be approximately 34 acres and is largest lot in the preliminary plat. The lot is
located south of U.S. 33 and north of University Boulevard. This lot is subject to a future
final development plan application to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. That application has been submitted to Staff for review and includes paths
that extend from the public right-of-way into the site as requested by the Commission.
The paths meander off Lot 2 along the east and west boundaries and the City and OSU
will work to address maintenance of these areas in the future.
• Lot 3 is 16.44 acres and located south of U.S. 33 and north of where University
Boulevard extends west off Shier Rings Road.
• Lot 4 is 24.37 acres and proposed on the south side of University Boulvard, north of
Shier Rings Road. This lot will include the relocation of Cosgray Creek to accommodate
the new roadway. The creek will be in a conservation easement along the north side of
Shier Rings Road, which is included on the final plat. In the future, this lot will also
accommodate the AEP transmission line and poles, which are proposed to run along the
south side of University Boulevard. An easement will be created for the lines in the
future.
• Lot 5 is 1.38 -acre and is a remnant of the 15.6 -acre parcel in the northwest portion of
the site, created through the dedication of the right-of-way and intersection with
Eiterman Road.
All lots meet all Zoning Code requirements except Lot 5. This lot is a residual of land based
on the geometric layout of University Boulevard and the city -owned property boundaries
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-027FP I University Boulevard, Phase 2
Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 Page 5 of 6
and City Council approved a variance through for this lot in accordance with §152.110 at the
preliminary plat review.
Streets
Access to the proposed lots will be provided from Shier Rings and Eiteman Roads via a new
public street, University Boulevard. University Boulevard will be an arterial street with four
travel lanes (2 in each direction). Bike lanes (5 feet in width) are included with the roadway
as required in the adopted Bicycle Task Force recommendations. This section of University
Boulevard will tie into the existing section near S.R. 161, opposite of Industrial Parkway, in
the future.
A shared -use path is located along the south side of the Shier Rings Road frontage and will
connect to a path on the south side of University Boulevard. A sidewalk will be installed on
the north side of University Boulevard and the widened section of existing Shier Rings Road.
This will connect into the path system on Avery Road.
The Subdivision Regulations require a right-of-way width of 100 feet for a boulevard, and
the applicant is proposing a right-of-way width of 100 feet. The Subdivision Regulations also
require a minimum curvature radius from the center -line of 400 feet for an arterial or
collector streets. The proposed preliminary plat shows a curvature radius of 800 feet and
over for University Boulevard. These exceed the minimums in the Subdivision Regulations
for an arterial/boulevard roadway.
Open Space
No open space is required for commercial subdivisions. There will be an environmental
covenant (similar to a conservation easement) along Shier Rings Road and the western
property line to protect the relocated creek.
3. Criteria Analysis
The Zoning Code does not contain specific criteria to guide the review of plats. Planning bases
the evaluation on the conformance of the plat with the requirements set forth in Chapter 152:
Subdivision Regulations of the Code:
1) Plat Information and Construction Requirements
Criteria Met. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision
Regulations. The applicant will be required to make any minor technical adjustments
prior to Council review.
2) Lots, Street, Sidewalk, and Bikepath Standards
Criteria Met with previous Variance Approval. Lot 5 does not meet the minimum lot
size standard. This lot is a residual of land based on the geometric layout of
University Boulevard and the city -owned property boundaries.
3) Utilities
Criteria Met. Proposed and existing utilities are shown on the plat.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 20-027FP I University Boulevard, Phase 2
Thursday, March 5, 2020 1 Page 6 of 6
4) Open Space Requirements
Criteria Met. Open space dedication is not required with this preliminary plat.
4. Recommendation
Staff has determined that the application complies with all applicable review consideration and
is recommending approval with one condition:
1) The applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made
prior to City Council submittal.
RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045
59-19
Resolution No. _ Passed. , 20
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE PLAT FOR
UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD PHASE 2 RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION AND
SUBDIVISION WITH A VARIANCE TO LOT SIZE
WHEREAS., application for approval of the plat for University Boulevard Phase 2 has
been made under Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin; and
WHIEREAS, the plat application has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, which has recommended approval and acceptance of the plat; and
WHEREAS
® the Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the reports of staff, and the subdivision requirements of Chapter
152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin, and desires to approve said plat
and accept all rights of way, easements, and other interests dedicated to the City
therein;
NOIV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of
Ohio, of the elected members concurring that:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and accepts the plat for University
Boulvard Phase 2, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The City Manager, Law Director, Clerk of Council, and any other required
City employee or official are authorized to execute the plat on behalf of the City.
Section 3. Pursuant to Section 4.04 of the Charter, this resolution shall take effect
immediately upon passage.
Mayer — Presiding
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
BARRETT BROTHERS - DAYTON, OHIO
Feld
Dublin City Council
November 4, 2019
Meeting
Page 2 of 13
Form 6101
0 lsygkl
� 1111 is I Will
iilim
-IIMI-
-
iam A
-
WHO
Aft Ab
1i LW -11
a a sign
N
1111111111
11.1111102
ALI! I LEI
iiiiiii
Ah Akll� 1,
Alk AN Ah Ah
In AN,
all,
*MRLM%L�M
LIM Willi
�MIN
11
-
Ab
-III EM La!
Mi
Ah Mi III
Ll- -
NA
Resolution 59-19
Approving and Accepting the Plat for University Boulevard Phase 2 Right -of -
Way Dedication and Subdivision with a Variance to Lot Size.
Ms. Husak stated that this plat creates a right-of-way for the purposes of accessing this
site and also creates lots, one of which will be developed with the OSU project. The
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat. The regional roadway
network that this ties into has been shared with the applicant as well as members of the
community over the last few months. M's. Husak shard graphics illustrating the
infrastructure needs throughout the various phases of this project, such as the relocation
of thEl. Cosgray Ditch and the roundabouts that will be incorporated. There are no other
proposed developments as a part of this plat regarding the other 4 parcels.
Ms. Husak noted that all of the parcels are zoned in the West Innovation District and
there is a requirement for parcels to be not less than 3 acres in size. There is one parcel
that was created as part of this that is residual land that cannot really be developed and
is under 3 acres. Because it does not meet the underlying zoning, staff is requesting that
Council approve a variance that allows this lot (lot 5) to be created at less than 3 acres.
In response to Mr. Keenan's question regarding who is adjacent to lot 5, Ms. Husak
stated that Gioffre Companies, Inc. is located to the south.
Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes asked for additional explanation regarding the creation of
lot 5 and why it wasn't just left as residual land for now.
Ms. Husak stated that due to the lot lines and the Gioffre property, it creates a lot. The
only other thing that could be done is to make it all right-of-way.
Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes asked why it couldn't just be left as right-of-way until a lot
is created. It seems a lot will be created when the land acquisition occurs for the balance
of University Boulevard.
Ms. Husak stated that she isn't sure that would occur. It is just the geometry of the
intersection and not that much right-of-way is needed.
Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes asked why it is shaped that way. She also asked why we
don't have the right-of-way along University Boulevard and why doesn't it front all of
Eiterman.
Mr. McDaniel stated that this is an interim condition. University Boulevard will eventually
be extended to the north and west, but for now it has to tie into Eiterman Road.
Ms. Cox stated that Eiterman is being swept slightly to the north and east to the single
lane roundabout, so the lot that is created is between the Gioffre property and the
roundabout. It could have been labeled as reserve, but it may need to be modified again
as University Boulevard is extended to the west.
Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that she doesn't want to break our own rules if it is
not nE'.cessary.
Ms. Cox stated that she understands her concern.
Mr. McDaniel stated that this could be potentially negotiated as part of a property deal
with a neighboring landowner. If the neighbor prefers not to do that, then this has to be
held as a separate lot for now.
Vote on the Variance: Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Mr. Keenan,
yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Fox, yes; M.�. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan,
yes; Nlayor Peterson, yes; Vice Mayor Arnorose Groomes, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
BARRETT BROTHERS - DAYTON, OHIO
Held_
Dublin City Council
November 4, 2019
Meeting
€eF-6A1
Page 3 of 13
Ms. Alutto abstained from this discussion and vote due to her working relationship with
OSU.
[Ms. Alutto rejoined the session. The sE.1cond reading/public hearing of ordinances
continued.]
Mayor Peterson moved to waive the Council Rules to address Ordinances 54-19, 55-19
and 56-19 together.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion: Vice Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto,
yes; lAr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes.
Cl gel 0 n_-
%or a Son a a a 3 n ce
• . .
- -
. r
. •
r
- -
. Apall
-
•
- and
I
• - -
♦ .
• -
Pop
- -�
. . .
-
_
Ufar-r=nbg
•
- •
1311111
-
• . . .
.
.
f'r-nna
•
_ I .
Ichoatioel at
• _ •
UnachAg%agll
_
•
Cann*
• t
ha
.
. .
anon
.
N3
.
thio
.
.
Dsohlor-
.
. . .
. _
Withamot
. . .
f r-
. .
Champ,
■
vn.gw
•
h., a, W
.
Aillithgm
13aco"nuolatc and
mw %W %.a SON 0 a 0 %.01 a a %.%.V %A a 0
. r
%`1111 %101 %.& a 0
�\ 1-c
111. a %& %.a
r
.
. •
I
.
.
.
.
1113-
_
• .
• .
. 1 • Jkr-r-acc
\ .
Nap
.
. . . .
2 r .
�.
War-r-anbg
1 OJO-Acr
Mood
Tpnaonarnng .
v .
.
.nb
.
Car
-anti
•
I
.
■ .
.►
• . 1.
_ff Er _
.
. • _
.
.
_
acp
. . .
of Canictr-soo-41-ona
. _
a hi ew
1 .
W %-am%--
d . .
. Cl
%00%-7
. .
R
2-s"On"W's
�\
.
. •
.n
'I "
.
.
.
. .
(Id
..ee.—Ki.
• l
• .
r .
alssag
1
.
I Wmah
.• .
C
nxgduEl
.
eze
• . . . .. .
m a %aft.711he N-111VII
1 . .
.
.
i .
.
. . 33
M
v
-Al
i
►
Qaadwau
.
. . at
%ff.Mmm...ff
.
ral 30
'aaalwas
. Chall
Carn
.
1 .
. Onion
. far-
■
. thim
• N- -
-
s,
---
-
-
Gj No at. -
�;.
yiniz-
Vor-in
-
pr- ApAeFese
C-.r-PQ=,zg_Er
�les.
•
• 1
%00 ME • .Ono_
. 1 .
n%oON
.
ancaa
•
0.
.
Nnic"Imbg..
• •
•ll
.
-
.
.
.
. .
.
•
. r
. .
_
.
•
.
_
%do NSA
. . r
.
. ■
• . .
• _
r .
.
Itc
*a
■
A ccar-la
■
■
v.01
.
. 1 . ■
1
ILW"RIll0
•
.
'RAN
GY7
■
. .
r it -A4 . . \ I
I I
•
Incl lr-i
.
.
. . .
. . .
. .r-1:iAnIIII
. •
.
.
. =
. I
• .
•
.
Q p Q •
• 1 of
• _ I
• •
Q •
1 •
_ •
_ • 2
Q
ru
r
- • - �. r
111111 111 all 011 '011 1 '61 1 11
• V 1
. . . . .
s r • a
-- -� - --�w
\ I
r r
' r
m0w.
r
VII 101
• •LWI.
All.
r - e
r . r
r -
Is E
.
. .
'a'', 01111i���
r� •► . •
r r ..
r r
..
rr
. . .
01I
9
..
. r .
•• IS•
i
. . r . .
.WN111111111
.
.MI
w �.
.
.
- .
.
.
IAll
. .
.
-
b •
. .
.
.
..
.
.
•
..
• .
I ip. i
. • _ .
. •
• • .
•• ••
i
. •
. . .
'W
N.MIA
.
•
_ •
• r
. . •
• _ 1
•
. . •
! .
• �•
•
• r • •
•
•
•
• •
•
•• • r
• �i
• • •
• •
- -
�!ll
• 1
•
•
•
---
•
- _
. .
qz-
ArA •
• •
• •
•
•
RECORD OF ACTION
City of
Dublin Planning & Zoning
OHIO, USA Thursday, September 19, 2019 I
Commission
U=.
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
2. University Boulevard Phase 2 6600 Shier Rings Road
19-080 Preliminary Plat
Proposal: A Preliminary Plat for the provision of right-of-way for University
Boulevard to extend from Shier -Rings Road west to intersect with
Eiterman Road and the creation of a ±34 -acre parcel for future
development of a medical center.
Location: North of Shier Rings Road and west of the intersection with Avery Road.
Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary
Plat under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.066 and the
Subdivision Regulations.
Applicant: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager, City of Dublin
Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner
Contact Information: 614.410.4675, chusak@dublin.oh.us
Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/19-080
MOTION 1: Ms. Call moved, Mr. Fishman seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the
following variance from the Subdivision Regulations:
1. To permit the creation of Lot 5 at 1.23 acres instead of meeting the Zoning Code required 3 -acre
minimum.
VOTE, 7 - 0
RESULT: The variance from the Subdivision Regulations to permit the creation of Lot 5 at 1.23 acres
instead of 3 acres was recommended to City Council for approval.
Victoria Newell
Yes
)ane Fox
Yes
Warren Fishman
Yes
Kristina Kennedy
Yes
William Wilson
Yes
Mark Supelak
Yes
Rebecca Call
Yes
Page 1 of 2
PLAMMING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 2 of 20
CASES
1. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 6600 Shier Rings Road, 19-
055, Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Ms. Newell stated that this is a request for a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan of
a t34 -acre site, from ID -1 to PUD to facilitate the future development of a medical office
building and an ambulatory care center (Phase I) and a future hospital (Phase II). The site
is on the north side of Shier Rings Road, east of Eiterman Road, west of Avery Road, and south
of US 33.
Ms. Husak requested that Cases 1 and 2 be considered together.
2. University Boulevard Phase 2, 6600 Shier Rings Road, 19-080, Preliminary Plat
Ms. Newell stated that this is a request for a Preliminary Plat for the provision of right-of-way for
University Boulevard to extend from Shier -Rings Road west to intersect with Eiterman Road and
the creation of a t34 -acre parcel for future development of a medical center. The site is north of
Shier Rings Road and west of the intersection with Avery Road.
Staff Presentation
Ms. Husak stated that on August 22, 2019, the Commission reviewed and provided non-binding
comments on a Concept Plan for this project. Tonight, the Commission is considering the Ohio
State University (OSU) development as well as the creation of a new road, University Boulevard.
At the Ohio University (OU) site on the south side Post Road, there is a piece of University
Boulevard, to which this new section of the road eventually will connect and create a road network
that has been planned for multiple years for the West Innovation District (WID). The Preliminary
Plat for this project, which is Case 2, contains the detail on the creation of the parcel for Ohio
State University, as well as the road. The approximately 34 -acre site for the OSU Wexner Medical
Center will be developed in two phases. The Preliminary Development Plan is similar to what the
Commission reviewed in August. It includes a medical office building and ambulatory care facility.
The future University Boulevard will be located on the south side of the site with a roundabout,
which will provide site access. There also will be two minor access points on the east and west
sides of the lot to provide access to the remaining parcels. In Phase 2, the hospital will be added
on the east side of the medical facility, as well as additional parking and access that will allow
additional uses. The applicant has included a significant amount of information in the proposed
development text, including the permitted materials. Staff has encouraged that the structure be
very similar to the existing West Innovation District (WID) zoning text. The rendering, the same
as that shown with the Concept Plan review on August 22, depicts the creation of a walkable
environment. Additional updated drawings show both respite and walking pathways through the
parking lots. There are unique sign requirements for this use. After Dublin Methodist Hospital
completed their facility and had data based upon user experience, they returned to the
Commission to upgrade their sign rules. Making an effort to be at the forefront of that discussion,
OSU has included sign requirements and diagrams in the development text. The rules and
regulations in the development text will guide future signage. There are five hierarchy signs. A
monument sign is proposed for the entry feature at the roundabout, well as vehicular signs that
are taller than the Code permits but address the parking and navigation needs. Staff recommends
approval with eight (8) conditions.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 3 of 20
For Case 1, the OSU Wexner Medical Center rezoning and preliminary development plan, staff
recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. That the development text and the sign plan be updated to address the discrepancies
prior to Council review, including the correct nomenclature and permitted sizes,
permitted lighting and permitted number of secondary monument signs;
2. That the applicant update the development text to clarify that peninsulas may count
in the interior landscape requirements;
3. That the smaller trees shown on the plans in the interior landscape areas be
permitted in the development text;
4. That the development text be revised to include bio -retention measures, as
appropriate, in the parking lot areas to aid in stormwater management and provide
for irrigation of trees. This should include the elimination of the requirement of curbed
islands;
5. That the applicant continue to work with Engineering to demonstrate compliance with
stormwater requirements as defined in Chapter 53 to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer;
6. That the building elements and mechanical equipment areas be screened per Code in
the text;
7. That the applicant work with staff to identify areas where new trees are appropriate
to reduce the need for future removal during Phase 2 and update the text
accordingly; and
8. That the applicant coordinate with ODOT for necessary approvals to remove any
dead, invasive or hazardous vegetation along the frontage.
For Case 2, the preliminary plat for University Boulevard, approval is recommended for the
following variance from the Subdivision Regulations:
1) To permit the creation of Lot 1 at 1.23 -acre instead of meeting the Zoning Code
required 3 -acre minimum.
The application complies with all applicable review consideration and the intended development
character of the area; therefore, approval of the plat is recommended with one condition:
1) The applicant ensure any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to
City Council submittal.
Ms. Husak noted that several discussions have occurred with the Ballantrae neighborhood
residents regarding this project, some of whom are present tonight.
Board Questions
Mr. Fishman stated that traffic around US33 is a significant concern with the proposed project.
He inquired about the timing of the two construction phases and the roadway.
Ms. Husak responded that City Council approved a development agreement with OSU earlier this
year that provides for the alignment of OSU's and the City's construction activities for 2022.
Barb Cox, City Engineering Manager, asked if his inquiry concerned potential roadway work
around the US33 interchanges with Avery-Muirfield or Post Road.
Mr. Fishman responded that was part of his question.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 4 of 20
Ms. Cox responded that traffic studies indicate there is no need for roadway work at either of the
interchanges for this project at this time. As more development occurs in the WID, it could become
necessary. In anticipation of the construction of University Boulevard, permitting for the relocation
of the creek is occurring, as well as the design of and right-of-way acquisition for the roadway.
Construction of the roadway project is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2021 with completion
anticipated in 2022.
Mr. Fishman inquired if the infrastructure construction would be completed before construction
of the building.
Ms. Cox replied that construction of the building and roadway would occur simultaneously.
Mr. Supelak inquired what is the extent of the roadway construction.
Ms. Cox responded that the roadway project currently under design is for improvements to Shier
Rings at Avery Road, widening of Shier Rings Road up to its curve north into this property, and
connection of the new roadway to Eiterman Road. Future construction phases will extend the
roadway from Eiterman Road to the Ohio University campus. That construction is not currently
scheduled.
Mr. Supelak stated that in the meeting materials, drawings showed three potential roundabout
locations. Which drawing is the most accurate?
Ms. Cox responded that the OSU team included a traffic engineer who conducted traffic studies
pertaining to this development. The City also has engaged engineers to conduct traffic studies
for the infrastructure project. There is some diversity in the OSU and City drawings, and analysis
and coordination of the two studies is underway. A public meeting is scheduled on October 15 to
share the final roadway plan to the public. At an earlier public meeting in August, Shier Rings
Road and the new University Boulevard were shown as disconnected. Following that public input,
traffic studies were re-evaluated. Although there is a significant level of access management to
consider, there will be a Shier Rings Road connection to the new University Boulevard.
Ms. Call inquired if the Commission would receive a full transportation plan for this area.
Ms. Cox responded affirmatively. This is a preliminary plat. A final plat will be brought before the
Commission at a future meeting, and more details will be shown at that time. Due to the distance
between the two ends of University Boulevard, completion of the road extension likely will occur
with the development of those parcels.
Ms. Call stated that her concern is not just this particular plat. Per her review, the existing
University Boulevard appears to be approximately 1.25 miles away from the new roadway. She
is concerned about using a name for the proposed roadway that is already in use in the other
location, although the intent is that eventually they would connect. The land between is owned
by several property owners, who could or could not choose to develop it for some time.
Ms. Cox responded that the City has previous experience with disconnected streets, some of
which have not been connected for many years. The City Thoroughfare Plan and Community Plan
provide guidance to assure that those connections will be completed.
Mr. Supelak stated that at the Commission's previous discussion, the roadway topic was very
important to both the public and the Commission. The sooner everyone can understand the final
roadway plan, the better decisions the Commission will be able to make.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 5 of 20
Mr. Fishman concurred. He also is concerned about the timing. Will the road be in place before
the people and the buildings?
Ms. Cox responded that the EDA contemplated all those issues, including the synchronization of
the OSU and City construction schedules so that the road will be open and available when this
medical facility is ready.
Mr. Fishman inquired when the Commission would be able to see a complete plan.
Ms. Cox responded that it would be provided to the Commission with the final plat. It may be
necessary to add some easements as the project proceeds through final design.
Ms. Husak stated that the Commission serves as an advisory board to City Council in terms of
platting of property, but the Commission does not approve proposed infrastructure projects.
Mr. Wilson inquired if the road primarily would be on Dublin property, although private property
is also involved.
Ms. Cox responded that is correct. Some right-of-way acquisition from the private property owner
will be necessary.
Mr. Wilson inquired if discussion had been initiated, and the property owner was in agreement.
Ms. Cox responded that the property owner is aware of the project. However, the acquisition
process cannot begin until design has occurred, plans are available, specifics land needs are
known, and appraisals have been completed. Most of that work will occur next year.
Ms. Call stated that recent public meeting comments reflect a predominant concern regarding
traffic. Were other concerns expressed at the last meeting that have not been addressed by the
applicant?
Ms. Husak responded that a majority of the comments were infrastructure or traffic related. Some
residents expressed concerns about the lighting. City Code requires lights to be lowered after
certain times of the day, and a reference to that Code section is included in the development text.
Details about the fixtures, lighting levels and isometric plans will be provided at the Final
Development Plan review.
Ms. Call inquired if there were any items not addressed by the applicant.
Ms. Husak responded that there were not.
A rendering of the regional roadway network map was shown, depicting the proposed roadway
extension to the north behind the Sports Ohio facilities and connection to existing University
Boulevard near SR 161/Post Road. Ms. Cox stated that the distance is similar to the improvement
from Avery Road to Eiterman Road. It will be a four -lane, divided roadway with bike lanes,
consistent with the existing road section near the OU/SR161/Industrial Parkway roundabout.
Mr. Call inquired if there would be sidewalks on both sides of the roadway.
Ms. Cox responded that a shared -use path would be on one side and a sidewalk on the other.
Ms. Fox inquired if the bike lanes would have a protective barrier.
Ms. Cox responded that they would not; they would be striped lanes, similar to those on Muirfield
Drive.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 6 of 20
Ms. Fox inquired if there was any consideration for making them protected lanes.
Ms. Cox responded that was not requested by the Bicycle Advisory Task Force. However, the
lanes will be widened to five feet, a foot wider than the bike lanes on the existing University
Boulevard section.
Ms. Call inquired the width of the shared -use path.
Ms. Cox responded that it would be the standard 8 -ft. width.
Ms. Fox stated that the WID has been under scrutiny for the last several years. Is there an
updated, current Master Plan?
Ms. Husak responded affirmatively. An update of the WID Special Area Plan in the Community
Plan was approved in 2017. Consultant Brian Atkins developed the plan, and public input was
obtained.
Ms. Fox inquired if a master layout of the anticipated pedestrian connectivity was available, even
though details could not be available until development occurs.
Ms. Husak responded that it is available to some extent. The Thoroughfare Plan, which is included
in the Community Plan, shows a road connection from Shier Rings Road to the northwest. With
the OSU project, that roadway will take on more importance than originally contemplated.
Although a roadway was always planned, the developer or user that would eventually drive those
decisions was unknown. With this infrastructure, walking paths and bike lanes will be important,
particularly so in this District. OU also included this extension in their Master Plan for future
development.
Ms. Fox stated that with the anticipated AEP project, realignment of Cosgray Ditch, construction
of a new roadway, and a major new development, there is a need for a comprehensive overview
of this intended "live, work, play' area. Although the development is at an early stage, it would
be helpful to have an understanding of what is anticipated.
Mr. Husak pointed out that it is not possible to make 11,000 acres across the City walkable
everywhere, but it does make sense for certain areas, particularly OU and OSU.
Ms. Call stated the concern is that we do not want to repeat past mistakes, for instance, those
with the Perimeter Center.
Ms. Fox inquired what changes OSU had made responsive to the Commission's previous
recommendations.
Ms. Husak responded that OSU had included walkability drawings for both development phases.
Much work still needs to occur with the interior layout of the building, which will inform much of
the exterior functionality of the site. Rules in the text address many of the items the Commission
requested, and an updated drawing has been provided tonight.
Ms. Fox stated that in the parking lots, little islands with two trees remain in the plan, but there
are no dedicated pedestrian walkways through the parking lots. Pedestrian benches have been
added on the outer perimeter of the parking lots, but more seating areas are needed between
the perimeter and the building. An Ambulatory Care Center must address the pedestrian needs.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 7 of 20
Applicant Presentation
Aaron Underhill, attorney, Underhill & Hodae, 8000 Walton Parkway, New Albany, OH stated that
he is representing Ohio University Wexner Medical Center. With him are OSU representatives and
consultants, Dan Like and Keith Myers.
As a brief overview, OSU took the Commission's input at the previous meeting very seriously
regarding the need to be connected with the community, provide pedestrian access to/from the
parking areas, and the creation of inviting pedestrian places. The reason they preferred to do a
PUD was that it is difficult to provide a high level of detail at this point as they continue to design
a very complex building. For instance, Ms. Fox referred to the pedestrian benches, which
appeared to be located far from the front door; however, the parking lot area will have several
such pedestrian seating opportunities. When they return with the Final Development Plan, they
will be able to show a greater level of detail. This is the reason the two-step PUD process works
well. In the first step, the rules are set; in the second, the execution of the rules is shown. With
the existing zoning, they would not have had that opportunity, as it would have been necessary
to show all the detail now. This is one of three facilities being designed simultaneously for the
University. The building is continuing to evolve. The inside -out nature of the design affects how
the building footprint works, what the architecture will be, and the exterior amenities designed
for the patient experience. He believes the Commission will be pleased with the level of detail
provided at the next review. They are comfortable with the rules being set. The plan is advanced
sufficiently to be able to make those commitments, but it will continue to evolve between now
and the time the Final Development Plan returns to the Commission. After the previous hearing,
an attempt was made to evaluate opportunities for pedestrian connections and public spaces.
They do not want this building to be an island in and of itself, so more progress will be made in
that regard. The text is lengthy because it contains a high level of commitments. Sometimes it is
hard to provide in words what can be seen on a plan, so they have tried to marry the two to the
extent possible. This is a public-private partnership, which involved extensive work on the EDA,
as well as the conveyance agreement. If the roadway is not operational, the medical facility will
not be able to open; therefore, the timing of the two projects is important. Per the agreement,
specific timelines must be met. The City did not want to sell OSU the land if they did not move
forward with developing it. As soon as it is approved, the project will proceed immediately to
permit designs. The university has a financial investment in the public infrastructure, as well.
Although OSU is receiving an incentive package, they are purchasing the land at its per acre value
and contributing 32.5% to the costs of the infrastructure. That percent was based on the amount
of the infrastructure that the facility would use, per its frontage. The project began approximately
a year ago and continues to evolve. When it next comes before the Commission, a greater level
of detail will be available for discussion.
Questions for the Applicant
Ms. Fox commended the applicant for presenting conceptual ways for providing a pedestrian
perimeter for the medical facility, their clients and the community. Her request is that when Phase
2 proceeds, those pedestrian spaces are not minimized, that the natural spaces are not reduced
to small spaces around walkways. With its style of architecture and the amount of landscaping
contemplated, this site can become an attractive area for the community. The landscape design
should not only highlight the building but also invite people to enjoy the surroundings. That is a
wellness factor for their clients and for the community.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 8 of 20
Keith Myers, Vice President of Planning, Architecture and Real Estate, OSU, stated that they agree
with Ms. Fox's comments. The scale at which the improvements are drawn is deceiving, but to
address the Commission's comments at the previous review, thousands of feet of trail have been
added. Although not yet fully designed, seating enclaves will be added. There is a large
greenspace between the parking lot and the drop-off area. They concur that the exterior spaces
are as important to health as the interior spaces being constructed.
Ms. Call stated that OSU's contribution of 32.5% for the infrastructure, which is a savings for the
residents, is appreciated. The Commission understands that there is an incentive package, but
appreciates that OSU is willing to partner with the City on this amenity for the City.
Public Comment
Randall Ayres, 5940 Roundstone Place, Dublin, Ohio, stated that he is a resident of the Ballantrae
community. This project seems premature. The Planning staff member with whom he spoke
indicated that staff was advised there was a need to move quickly on this project. At the public
meeting in August, the Ballantrae community expressed significant opposition to the proposed
plans for Shier Rings Road. Earlier, Mr. Supelak referred to several different maps that the
Commission had seen. That has been the experience of the community, as well, and the residents
are in opposition to most of them. Many Ballantrae residents travel Shier Rings daily, and they
have been provided different information from City staff. At the August public meeting,
Engineering staff informed them the project was very preliminary and that City staff would be
getting back to them. This is September and neither the community nor the Commission know
the plans because staff is unsure of them. The Commission is being asked to approve a project
on which they have inadequate information and knowledge, and the community objects strongly
to a change being made to Shier Rings Road. OSU representatives have commented on how
much the University will be contributing; however, it pays neither real estate nor income taxes.
While the City may be partnering with OSU, the University is not paying its share. The City
purchased this property last year, and residents were told in March 2018 that this development
would not happen for 5-15 years. Now this project is being pushed forward without sufficient
time for people to understand any details. The Commission is being asked to make a decision
without time to obtain adequate information. How will University Boulevard impact Shier Rings
Road and the traffic, particularly the significant amount of eastbound traffic? How will Ballantrae
residents access US33? How many roundabouts will be constructed? He has seen a map with
three proposed roundabouts between Shier Rings and US33. In summary, he is concerned that
the Commission is being asked to make a decision on a project about which staff is unsure of
some plans.
Dan Rippeth, 5960 Roundstone Place, Dublin, Ohio stated that he is a Ballantrae resident and has
lived in Dublin for seven years. He has spoken with many of his neighbors. Their biggest concern
is not the hospital, but with the plans to shut down Shier Rings and the redirection of traffic up
and around Eiterman Road and through a series of roundabouts. He asked for confirmation
regarding the closing of Shier Rings Road.
Staff indicated that the road would not be closed.
Mr. Rippeth stated that if Shier Rings will not be shut down, that information addresses one of
the residents' greatest concerns. The intersection at Eiterman Road and Shier Rings Road is
dangerous. There was an accident there earlier this evening. There is a concern about the
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 9 of 20
generation of additional traffic. If Shier Rings remains with the addition of a roundabout at Shier
Rings and Eiterman Roads, perhaps the traffic issue will be addressed.
Ms. Husak stated that when the project was introduced to the community at the August public
meeting, significant opposition to the roadway plans was expressed by the Ballantrae residents.
Consequently, the City is no longer considering the termination of Shier Rings Road. Another
public meeting is scheduled for October 15 at the Dublin Community Recreation Center, and
Engineering staff will be providing updated plans. Public notice of the meeting will be made. City
staff has heard and responded to the residents' concerns.
Mr. Rippeth responded that the residents love living in Dublin and appreciate the fact that the
City has listened to their concerns.
Commission Discussion
Ms. Kennedy thanked Mr. Ayers and Mr. Rippeth for sharing their opinions. Although the
Commission does read the public meeting reports, it is helpful to hear directly from the citizens.
Ms. Fox inquired about preservation plans. On the City -owned property, certain trees are at risk,
due to construction: Tree #299, a 56 -in. diameter Silver Maple and Tree #300, a 43 -in. diameter
Silver Maple, are located near the entrance. Is there any possibility those trees could be saved?
Ms. Cox stated that the trees, shown on page #10 of the information, are located opposite the
City Service Center. That is where the confluence of the relocated creek will be located. They are
required to plant a certain number of trees with the relocation of the stream, and may be able to
save those two trees. She will check into the situation.
Ms. Fox responded that the relocated stream would border Shier Rings Road, which will be a
viewshed. If there is opportunity to preserve those trees with the relocation of that stream, that
should be included in their design focus.
Ms. Call stated that the Commission has commented on the need for synchronization of the
building and roadway construction. Is the creek relocation, a third major project, not a timing
concern, as well?
Ms. Cox responded that the creek relocation has reached 50% design completion and been
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers and the Ohio EPA for permitting. Staff will be
responding to their feedback and completing the design. There will be a public notice in the
Columbus Dispatch on Monday, per EPA public notice requirements. Permitting should be
completed in the spring of 2020, and construction of the stream relocation will commence. The
roadway construction will begin in 2021. A conservation easement is noted on the plat, and
protective fences will be placed on the site. The new plants around the relocated creek must be
protected and monitored for five years. Due to the creek and the level of traffic on Shier Rings
Road, staff has been contemplating locating construction entrances off Eiterman Road to mitigate
the impact of the large building and large roadway construction occurring at the same time.
Ms. Call inquired if the standard is a 2 -to -1 vegetation mitigation for the stream relocation
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 10 of 20
Ms. Cox stated that she does not have that information with her, but getting the planting
established is a major concern. The stream must be healthy and the area viable for plants and
animals.
Ms. Newell requested, for the benefit of the public, that staff clarify what is considered with traffic
studies. There was a comment that the decision for a new road appears to be rushed. The
Commission has information from the traffic studies that is not always available to the public.
Ms. Cox responded that the City has a Thoroughfare Plan. Over -arching traffic modeling for the
entire City occurs based on Future Land Use Plans in the adopted Community Plan. That is how
the size of roadways, including number of lanes, is determined. With a proposed development,
the developer is required to look at their uses compared to the Future Land Use Plan. There are
federal guidelines regarding the traffic generation based on land use. For instance, a restaurant
generates traffic at a level different from a single-family home, and the traffic generated by a
medical office is different from that for a regular office building. A comparison is made between
the modeling for the adopted Community Plan and the modeling for the proposed development.
If the anticipated traffic will be more, plans for handing the traffic must be determined based on
its origination and destination. The prediction occurs by counting traffic at the existing
intersections then projecting the traffic increase based on the anticipated land use. They try to
determine what improvements might be needed to the intersections, to the links of the road
between the intersections, and the impact of the development. The proposed development is
required to mitigate their impact. That may be made by a financial contribution or by building
turn lanes, a roundabout, or another intersection improvement.
Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that the situation is the same with this application as with a standard
planning application. The traffic impact study is due when the applicant commences the
preliminary development plan. This team was a little ahead of schedule, so its study is under
review. The unique element involved is the additional CIP roadway project. Dates were
established in the EDA with the developer to make sure the timing is on track.
Ms. Newell inquired how many years out a traffic study projects.
Ms. Wawszkiewicz responded that a study looks at a 10 -year horizon from the opening day. Year
2022 is the target opening of this facility, so the 10 -year horizon would be 2032. The City's traffic
study projects out to year 2042.
Ms. Husak stated that it is unique to have both the developer and the City conduct traffic studies
and be evaluated together. Although the applicant's traffic engineer completed a study, the City
was looking at potentially terminating Shier Rings Road. That traffic study is not approved at this
time, however, because more work is to be completed.
Ms. Newell thanked staff for the explanation for the public.
Ms. Call stated that the Commission is considering a preliminary development plan for the medical
center and a preliminary development plat for a new roadway, University Boulevard, and not the
termination of Shier Rings Road. There will be a roundabout on the southeast section of the new
roadway, a roundabout immediately in front of the building, and then the roadway continues to
its connection with Eiterman Road.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 11 of 20
Ms. Husak stated the new roadway ends at the eastern boundary. Whatever happens further to
the east on Avery and Shier Rings Road is not part of this consideration.
Ms. Cox clarified that the plat creates the right-of-way, the parcels around the right-of-way, and
the new road. They are still working out the details regarding the connectivity of Shier Rings
Road, the drive into the Dublin School transportation facility, and the City Service Center. The
preliminary plat lays out the worst-case scenario. Currently, those connections are contemplated
via a roundabout. The plat allows that to occur, should that be determined.
Ms. Call inquired if the Commission would see this again as a Final Plat.
Ms. Cox responded affirmatively.
Mr. Supelak requested clarification that the intent is that a roundabout will make a connection to
Shier Rings Road.
Ms. Cox responded that the connectivity of Shier Rings would happen in that area. They are
completing the details on the accesses to the City Service Center and the Dublin Schools bus site.
They believe this layout of the right-of-way provides sufficient area for those accesses without
having to change the plat.
Mr. Supelak inquired if the two trees Ms. Fox was referring to are near the proposed roundabout.
Ms. Cox stated that those two trees are outside of the right-of-way.
Mr. Supelak responded that they are slightly to the west of it within a small curve. Trees #288
through #308 are an average of 30 inches each, a total of 600 caliper inches. Is it possible to
give consideration to saving those trees?
Ms. Cox responded that it may not be possible to work around all of the trees. Perhaps only a
couple can be saved, because that is the corridor for the realigned creek. They prefer to save
trees, if possible, but there are competing factors. There is a required landscape density for the
relocated stream. EMH&T experts will be conducting the planting to ensure the requirements are
met to obtain the federal permit.
Mr. Fishman inquired if City Code required that the tree caliper be replaced.
Ms. Newell stated that it does; however, Federal EPA regulations usurp City requirements.
Ms. Cox stated that the City replaces the street trees removed for a capital project. This project
also will have plantings in the medians. With those plantings and those added with the creek
relocation, there will be more trees than exist now.
Mr. Fishman inquired if the City arborist conducts an assessment of the trees.
Ms. Cox responded that the condition assessment of the trees has been completed, and that
report was included in the packet.
Ms. Husak stated that the arborist on Planning staff verifies species, size and health. This is a
Preliminary Plat. More detail will be available with the Final Plat.
Ms. Kennedy inquired if the details on the Eiterman Road access would be provided for public
review and comment.
Ms. Cox responded that the details will be available for the October 15 public meeting at DCRC.
Mr. Wilson inquired if it is a ditch or a creek that will be relocated.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 12 of 20
Ms. Cox responded that it is named Cosgray Ditch, but it has been referred to as both a ditch and
a creek. It is a manmade drainage channel for the farming community.
Mr. Wilson inquired if a ditch would not move as much water as a creek.
Ms. Cox responded that there are no such definitions. The relocated stream will handle the same
amount of water that it currently handles. No flooding will occur up or downstream due to the
relocation. It is an open channel relocation with meanders and a large amount of plants in a
tiered system — grasses, shrubs and trees, within the 135 -ft. conservation easement.
Mr. Wilson stated that the stream currently is shown as running south, then east and under the
roundabout, then reconnecting with the current channel. Are they still determining the new route?
Ms. Cox responded that the stream currently exists on the south side of Shier Rings Road. They
looked at several potential routes before selecting the one shown. The selected route works best
with the roads and utilities and will provide a buffer to the residents on the south side of Shier
Rings Road from the future commercial element. They are contemplating a shared -use path on
the interior, which would provide pedestrians access to that greenway and tie Shier Rings to
University Boulevard. The public will be able to enjoy both sides of the new waterway.
Ms. Newell inquired if the applicant was in agreement with the conditions.
Mr. Underhill indicated that they were in agreement with the conditions.
Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Wilson seconded to recommend approval of The Ohio State University
Wexner Medical Center rezoning and preliminary development plan to Council with the following eight
(8) conditions:
1. That the development text and the sign plan be updated to address the
discrepancies prior to Council review, including the correct nomenclature and
permitted sizes, permitted lighting and permitted number of secondary monument
signs;
2. That the applicant update the development text to clarify that peninsulas may count
in the interior landscape requirements;
3. That the smaller trees shown on the plans in the interior landscape areas be
permitted on the development text;
4. That the development text be revised to include bio -retention measures, as
appropriate, in the parking lot areas to aid in stormwater management and provide
for irrigation of trees; this should include the elimination of the requirement of
curbed islands;
5. That the applicant continue to work with Engineering to demonstrate compliance
with stormwater requirements as defined in Chapter 53 to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer;
6. That the building elements and mechanical equipment areas be screened per Code
in the text;
7. That the applicant work with staff to identify areas where new trees are appropriate
to reduce the need for future removal during Phase 2 and update the text
accordingly; and,
8. That the applicant coordinate with ODOT for necessary approvals to remove any
dead, invasive or hazardous vegetation along the frontage.
Vote: Mr. Supelak, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Wilson, yes; Ms.
Fox, yes; Ms. Newell, yes.
(Motion passed 7-0)
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes of September 19, 2019
Page 13 of 20
Ms. Call moved, Mr. Fishman seconded, to recommend approval of the following variance from the
Subdivision Regulations:
1) To permit the creation of Lot 1 at 1.23 -acre instead of meeting the Zoning Code
required 3 -acre minimum.
Vote: Ms. Fox, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Mr. Wilson, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Ms.
Kennedy, yes; Ms. Newell, yes.
(Motion passed 7-0)
Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Wilson seconded approval of the preliminary plat for University
Boulevard, Phase 2 with the following condition:
1) The applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made
prior to City Council submittal.
Vote: Mr. Supelak, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Wilson, yes; Ms
Fox, yes; Ms. Newell, yes.
(Motion passed 7-0)
[Cases 3 and 4 were considered together.]
�__n__ 191 n1n7en 1n nn� n����i�
3: corrt�r.-r� TLV: 2TTOS'OTTTj xTwr i�g
...
.. .
. . .
.
.
. .
... ..