Loading...
Resolution 016-20RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045 16-20 Resolution No. Passed , 20 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, application for approval of the plat for The Overlook at Tartan subdivision has been made under Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, the plat application has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, which has recommended approval and acceptance of the plat; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the reports of staff, and the subdivision requirements of Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin, and desires to approve said plat and accept all rights of way, easements, and other interests dedicated to the City therein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring that: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and accepts the plat for The Overlook at Tartan subdivision, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. The City Manager, Law Director, Clerk of Council, and any other required City employee or official are authorized to execute the plat on behalf of the City. Section 3. Pursuant to Section 4.04 of the Charter, this resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. Passed this day of V16VV&AA , 2020. Mayor —Presiding Officer ATTEST: C k o44incil City of Dublin Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017-1090 Phone: 614-410-4400 9 Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Dana McDaniel, City Manager Date: February 18, 2020 Initiated Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Interim Planning Director/Planning Manager By: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planning/Current Planning Manager Chase J. Ridge, AICP Candidate, Planner I Re: Resolution 16-20 - Preliminary Plat — Overlook at Tartan — (Case #19-085PP) Summary This is a request for review and acceptance of a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of a 24 -acre site into 56 single-family lots, reserves of open space, and right-of-way for new public streets. The site is located north of McKitrick Road and east of Hyland -Croy Road. Background The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application on December 12, 2019 and made a recommendation of approval to City Council. City Council introduced the accompanying rezoning ordinance on February 10, 2020. Process As provided by the Law Director's Office, when City Council approves Preliminary and Final Plats, the platting process is solely for the subdivision of the properties to identify property lines, establish easements, provide open space dedication, and create public rights-of-way. In this instance, the plat will subdivide the land and the development text will determine the setbacks, lot coverage and architectural requirements. Description Site The site consists of three parcels with approximately 1,370 feet of frontage along Hyland -Croy Road and approximately 960 feet of frontage along McKitrick Road. A pond is located in the northwest portion of the site and there is a silo in the southwest portion of the site. Surrounding Sites The Tartan Ridge subdivision is to the east of the site and is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Glacier Ridge Elementary School is located immediately north of the site and is zoned R, Rural District. To the west is Glacier Ridge Metro Park and to the south is the Tartan West subdivision. Memo re. Resolution 16-20 The Overlook at Tartan — Preliminary Plat February 18, 2020 Page 2 of 3 Preliminary Plat The proposed plat is for the subdivision of the site into 56 single-family lots, five open space reserves and new public streets. The proposed lots all meet the development standards set forth in the development text, which establishes the regulations for the neighborhood. There are two proposed lot types, Courtyard Lots and Patio Lots. Courtyard Lots will have a minimum width of 60 feet at the building line and Patio Lots will have a minimum width of 52 feet at the building line. All lots will have a minimum depth of 125 feet with a maximum lot coverage of 60 -percent, including the structure and driveway. The development text requires a minimum lot size of 6,500 -square -feet, with the largest lot being 10,764 -square -feet in size. Open Space The proposed preliminary plat subdivides 24.55 acres of land into 56 single-family lots, new public streets and five reserves of open space. The Subdivision Regulations require 3.56 acres of open space, and 7.7 acres are provided. The open space reserves range in size from 0.1 -acre to 7.2 acres. The majority of the open space is provided on the perimeter of the site, along Hyland -Croy Road to the west and McKitrick Road to the south. Access/Streets Primary access to the proposed lots will be from McKitrick Road via Brenham Way. Brenham Way currently ends at Baronet Boulevard; however, the street will be extended from its terminus at Baronet Boulevard to McKitrick Road to allow for access to the site. Enfield Trace currently ends in a hammerhead just east of the existing basin at the southeast portion of the site. The proposal includes extending this road to the west and connecting to the extension of Brenham Way. On the north end of the site, Emmet Row Lane will be extended to provide access to the new homes. Emmet Row Lane is proposed to terminate in a north -south orientation into Overlook Point. Overlook Point is proposed to curve to the south, turning into Claymore Drive. Claymore Drive will then terminate into the new extension of Brenham Way. Highland Pass (east -west), located in the center of the site, will serve as a connection between Brenham Way, Overlook Point and Claymore Drive. Overlook Point is terminated before connecting to Brenham Way. All streets are to be constructed with a width of 28 feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Right-of-way widths are 50 feet. There are 15 on -street parking spaces proposed in the development, five on each of the three north -south oriented streets. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the entirety of the site, including along all frontages and leading to a proposed overlook in Reserve A (northwest portion of the site). An eight -foot wide shared use path is proposed along McKitrick Road, turning north along the entire length of Hyland -Croy Road. Memo re. Resolution 16-20 The Overlook at Tartan — Preliminary Plat February 18, 2020 Page 3 of 3 Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat to City Council on December 12, 2019 with the conditions listed below. The applicant has addressed all of these conditions. 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments and updates to the plat in accordance with the accompanying Preliminary Development Plan are made prior to City Council submittal; and, 2) That the applicant continue to work with Staff to ensure that the street names are approved and indicated appropriately on the plat; and, 3) That the applicant revise the preliminary plat prior to Council review to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, as required by Code; and, 4) That the applicant revise the plat to accurately display the planned 100 -foot right-of-way for Hyland -Croy Road. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of the preliminary development plan on February 24, 2020. LOCATION MAP NO SCALE THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT PREPARED FOR: ROMAN ELLI & HUGHES 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 SUBMITTALS: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 OCTOBER 24, 2019 NOVEMBER 21, 2019 JANUARY 21, 2020 CIVIL ENGINEER Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emhuom INDEX OF DRAWINGS 1. VICINITY MAP 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLATSITE PLAN 3. SITE PLAN 4. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 5. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 6. TREE SURVEY & REMOVAL PLAN 7. TREE SURVEY LIST 100 -- -- F— — — 1 , 1 1 WI ON L OP RURAL _i _ _ _ T _ _ —r— _I _ _ -- --��- - -- -- 7:J z Z 0 r w ad Lu w N RURAL PUD VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1 "=200' BA G+4 TRACE r L 2 I I ' 1 I ' PUDI McKITRICK ROAD , I I I — — I ?'N RURAI' ' ol0 o � 0 O U w I� I I I I I I— — JEROME(OWNSHIP — — ITY OFIf DUBLIr GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 400 1 inch = 200 feet REVISIONS momm Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton s Tilton, Inc. •Planners • OH Engineers • bSurveyorsRoad, H43l54 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 ROMANELLI &HUGHES 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD W ESTERV LLE, OHIO 43081 CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK A T TARTAN RIDGE VICINITY MAP 'l Date SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 Job No. 20190043 DATE DESCRIPTION 20DATE REVISEDPEN FconnnnFNu 01/21/20 REVISED PERSTAFFCOMMENTS 01/21/2° REVISED PFRSTAFF COMMENTS Sale I"=60' Sheet 1 emhuom 2 I I ' 1 I ' PUDI McKITRICK ROAD , I I I — — I ?'N RURAI' ' ol0 o � 0 O U w I� I I I I I I— — JEROME(OWNSHIP — — ITY OFIf DUBLIr GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 400 1 inch = 200 feet REVISIONS momm Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton s Tilton, Inc. •Planners • OH Engineers • bSurveyorsRoad, H43l54 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 ROMANELLI &HUGHES 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD W ESTERV LLE, OHIO 43081 CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK A T TARTAN RIDGE VICINITY MAP LOCATED IN: VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME Date SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 Job No. 20190043 DATE DESCRIPTION 20DATE REVISEDPEN FconnnnFNu 01/21/20 REVISED PERSTAFFCOMMENTS 01/21/2° REVISED PFRSTAFF COMMENTS Sale I"=60' Sheet 1 emhuom PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE P. 134 LO co 01 0 N co 0 0 m REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION 10/23/19 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS 11/21/19 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS 01/21/20 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO 1.076 AC. (DEED) PARCEL 16 -WD I.N. 201805140003710 o a00 U �O i THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE I DUBLIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 12.433 AC. (DEED) 0. R. 609, P. 601 Item 13 20' Easement P.B. 5, P. 315 Item 13 Drainage Easement P.B. 5, P. 315 II 1 c o I I 0 I 0 U 3 10 I I I N 00 3 LO LO 0 0 z Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emht.com N83'52'39"E 695.50' _ M W I- Ln Item 13 0 < 0 Inoan 15' Easement P.B. 5, P. 315 !� `V z In I I I 0) O < Ln I I I Items 19 & 33 I Un J Qf o Sanitary Sewer � w a - Easement 0 Cn O.R. 731, P. 971 N S06'05'59"E R/W EMM_ET ROW 50.00' LANE I S83'54'01 "W S51'05'59"E I 36.74' 35.36' ro 41� I I I �w� cn E�� I I 0 i L CO 0 cr) w --- 0) I L0 -- I 0 0 is I o I BARONET BOULEVARD DVC 6700 ASSOCIATES, LLC N8354'01 "E - - 7.392 AC. (DEED) I 75.00' - _ - - II I.N. 201802270001572 R/W I I I I 23 979 AC 23.979 ACRES Situate in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Jerome, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military District Survey Number 2991, being comprised of all of that 16.670 acre tract of land conveyed to The Shoppes at Tartan Ridge, LLC by deed of record in Official Record 766, Page 143, all of that 7.392 acre tract of land conveyed to DVC 6700 Associates, LLC by deed of record in Instrument Number 201802270001572, and part of Reserve "Q" of the subdivision entitled "Tartan Ridge Section 5 Part 2", of record in Plat Book 5, Page 315 (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio) being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of McMtrick Road (County Road 10) and Hyland -Croy Road (County Road 2); Thence North 06° 05' 59" West, with the centerline of said Hyland -Croy Road, a distance of 1382.30 feet to the southwesterly corner of that 0.475 acre tract conveyed to City of Dublin by deed of record in Official Record 687, Page 589; Thence North 83° 52'39" East, crossing said Hyland -Croy Road and with the southerly line of that 12.433 acre tract conveyed to The Board of Education of the Dublin City School District by deed of record in Official Record 609, Page 601, a distance of 695.50 feet to the northwesterly corner of Lot 225 of said "Tartan Ridge Section 5 Part 2"; Thence South 06° 05'59" East, with the westerly line of said Lot 225, a distance of 150.37 feet to a point in the northerly right of way line of Emmet Row Lane; Thence South 83° 54' 01" West, with said northerly right of way line, a distance of 36.74 feet to a point in the westerly right of way line of Brenham Way; Thence South 06° 05'59" East, with said westerly right of way line, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point; Thence South 51 ° 05' 59" East, with said westerly right of way line, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point; Thence South 06° 05'59" East, partly with said westerly right of way line and partly crossing said Brenham Way, a distance of 416.66 feet to a point; Thence North 83° 54' 01" East, partly crossing said Brenham Way and partly with the southerly right of way line of Baronet Boulevard, a distance of 75.00 feet to a point; Thence South 38° 54' 01" West, crossing said Reserve "Q", a distance of 3 5.3 6 feet to a point; S38'54'01 "W ICq 35.36' Thence South 06° 05'59" East, crossing said Reserve "Q", a distance of 181.92 feet to a � co point in the westerly boundary of said subdivision; rn� E 1 RESERVE "Q" Thence with said westerly boundary the following courses and distances: �� N � Y Y g THE SHOPPES AT TARTAN RIDGE, LLC ro °' w E E o CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO 16.670 AC. (DEED) �, � w � o A=1.02'02" I.N. 201806150004700 With the arc of a curve to the right, having a central angle of 01' 02'02", a radius of O.R. 766, P. 143 +? I a o N R=225.00' 225.00 feet, an arc length of 4.06 feet, a chord bearing of South 07° 33'42" East and chord o41 Arc=4.06 distance of 4.06 feet to a point; L a °° ChB=S07*33'42"E ChD=4.06' South 07° 02'41 " East, a distance of 49.12 feet to a point of curvature to the left; N L I S07'02'41 "E E I 49.12' With the arc of said curve, having a central angle of 41' 52'26", a radius of 198.31 feet, w I A=41.52'26" an arc length of 144.93 feet, a chord bearing of South 27° 58'54" East and chord distance of N R=198.31 (D141.73 feet to a point; E c Arc= 144.93 E I ChB=S27.58'54"E a C I ChD=141.73' South 48' 55 06 East, a distance of 125.45 feet to a point of curvature to the right; w oN I s A=7.39'08" A�. R=275.00' 0) �M I ��s`SS- Arc=36.73' o 06'� ChB=S45'05'32"E ChD=36.70' N o I E oo S76'26'42"E 4 / N +1 0 0.25' NN E CL o moo•'` �o o w� I >ro E a o I o m 'c3`�. Som W m U� I 0D - o o a N ` N S21.55'51 "W A=1347'31 " I 35.50' R=274.99 I I I Arc=66.19 RESERVE "R" ChB=S13'22'15"E I I I I � �� ChD=66.03' S51 28 31 E 35.36'- - Detail "A" Ll See Detail R/W - NotS& 5&& - - VMS 2991 n - R/W - - - - - - SO6'28'31 "E I -, MCKITRICK ROAD S83'31'29"W 971.48' 40.00' I IN a II IN IW J WIDTH VARIES, PUBLIC, C.R. 10) - - - - - - - - - - I ED N w J R/W- - R/W I W 6 o oQ VMS 2925 CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO - 0.533 AC. (DEED) I S06'28'31 "E 1.621 AC. (DEED) I I.N. 201604140002688 I 0.61' I I.N. 201603220002029 I S F I GRAPHIC SCALE 0 50 100 200 1 inch = 100 feet CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO Date Job No. PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED IN: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 20190043 ROMANELLI & HUGHES FOR 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME Scale sheet LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PLAT 1"=100' 2/7 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE L --219---------- - ,a_ A--- f - - - - -- = --- if \,\ V L , \� II I �, I - __�� - -� EXISTING �i V Y _10Ftj4ESTRIAN PATH \ ADB% �" ,_--------- ------------------- 220r I L L 189 J I L ' T - -- - v"7l� �- RESERVFCR" %-- / 203 J /� 6 I L 190 J '` J PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO o _ - g`L CONNECT TO THE '� s �' EXISTING TRAIL ON THE ' I z / - I'' � ` � \ SOUTH IDE OF ENFIELD I I }, � � SOU S O 221 - / '' T / I m �- `' m 202 19, I I ``' I ; 1 o I ' J - / A-13'4731" • _ o ( T o z 3 R=274.99' W 11 Arc -66.19' - - I` -j ,�. ' ChB=S13*22'15'E, %� Q P, EXISTING BASIN - - ChD 66.03' �------- --- _ 821 fa > (TO BE MODIFIED) '55'51 "W 806'28'31 °E r - 201 I �; ' 192 _ SSI '`I 40.00' - 222 �,' I I 35.50' S51'28'31 °E 1 to L J I o0 ;'{� �" ; / 35.36' y l'' o w U-1 0 Z S o 5 _ _ I I -7 0/ EXISTING 8' WIDE N 20 L ASPHALT I• io w: 1 I J I LU . 193 m PEDESTRIAN PATH %1 / BASIN 02 A=7'39'08" 1 .N o l i n L I J L I X �° '•�o' R-275.00' �Yn`O V' _ w N '; I' 22 of _ 3 I ff l�� % ,; � , �I I , �I 1 U I L L Arc05 32 - - z, Oj ChB=S45'0532"E';'; TI_�___-' Ex 24"St' O Fx 24"ST O Fx 15"ST z} Fx 12"IT- - '� I%�I /� ChD=36.70' TC -1001.7 St I INV=995.24 5 T2s EX STAPLETON PLACE ;" •••- ! _Ex24"ST - O ,.=� CITY OF DUBLIN,'' If------------- ' o FI I I' ,'' I �o RESERVE ++A++ a ���° '' �� ±7.2 ACRES W I " - ,` PEDESTRIAN PATH - g ,�'L \ 1 i I Z l r L L L L �' /' I /+ A=41'52'26° EASEMENT a rJ rJ RESERVE= Q' - R=198.31'- , ' ,,/ `�- 1',` 1� I �� I I 'J. I ; I� I I / A-1'02'02" - / _ _ - - Q �t'k% - �;'�''', m I I Arc 144.93' - - C9 1- �'',,'' i. i ----- 3 O� R=225.00'. • -__ ... -- _ "-'-"" i-/ ��t' G •\�7- _,_ `°' I'uS > 3 I I J I J I I 4 I - �� - - Arc=4.06' - ChB-S2T58'54"E`.--- a, O 199 � j 194 � ; S38'54'01"W; ChB=S07'33'42"E---------- - 3 ~. __'___/f �0`4J��� ��`�r• \�J'li----------- 197 ----"" I , L L I { • ChD 141.7 '% l 1 -f -TARTAN -RID -GE j97 + 196 195 I 35.36' ChD=4.06' - - PEDESTRIAN PATH ,rye \ \ �- Ip z i '' \ \ \ 3 MOUND EN SECTION 5 PART 2 1 I ,/I 6 L _ L- L 1�5 --- - EASEMENT N Tc=1002-.10_ / /' 1 \ P.B. 5, P. 315 TC=1002.65 INV -999.96- LT LT I I o "S0702`41 "E .�` " 12788S.F - "-\-- - - _ INV=996.94 - -r-_ -- I I RES �' w 15-Ex1TSt - 2"St EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY C=1005.50 -IS06-05'59"E 181.92'-.- 49.12' 1` % _ TC=,003.76 BE VACATED INV -993.84 -- Rte, d �' �9'' ( Q 1\• / ±0.1 ACRES' 1TC=1002.69 y`' -INV=1000.13 t� Ex8'WM- -(PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED)--- 852-• o /( P I I 2-Z ,14'' 'I•• / ' INv=996.66 '� Lul Ex 12' ST , " TC -1 003.36 Ex 12 St - -_ - 3'-5' EARTHEN N ���- \ p ` 130 -{--r 6 f S06'05'59"E �- - INv=1000.33 - - - - - _ _-� N ,' - `� _- - / TC=,000.5 4 150.37 -,g c=1002.61 a BRNHAM W/�1Y MOUND_ ------- EX INV=994.74 INV=996.91---"-"_ - TF r15o' Fx15"ST -506'05'59"E 416.66'- z Teo, -- /------ _ ❑ EX 20' ST 0 v> 14 ;9 S V El } _ Sa= ,1 TC=1006.10 3 Ex 18" Sa C-144561-.�- - O 0 - -- Fx81"/-•�CCc--,t 4456)- z f C 7\3'--'- -I ff'Sa%'$CC-14456 -EASEMEM_ v 4 INV=993.50 47 v' RES 'B" +O,,�A RES _ EXISTING 150,- .- ., :. ry 125' ----- - -_-- 724' 124, -124 6• -.-x.55' - W - -' 2' F " 124s, _ -S83 54 01 W _ -I-- -i- - PEDESTRIAN PATH 36.74' - --- - _ _S51'O5'59"E" 3'-5'EARTHEN RESERVE"G" 099 S 125` --- 1�' '2 26`, 35.36' 27 ''`_ N MOUND tl N r' 3'-5' EARTHEN n n I\• I vNi v� " �'an l+n ±0.1 ACRES Ill" " EXISTING SANITARY h - - _ 45-'- MOUND 8452S.� .o 7818S:F w w ••lL543S.F (__-----, '32 I TO BE REMOVED _--' - - " 806'05'59°E 'Z Z 64995,E 33 Fn_""" k50'S.F__ .-I'� 56 _ _ - -- m 150' 50.00' J�Jr•__ 126' 125' ' 125•'`, 6574S.F \ t--- _ I - - 20'STESMT. - a ''r lam'}---b73(SSf'� - -- I (Q� , - - _ _ _ - MID , _ __125'_ - _ - - d 1 - _ r - - 30' '! r 25 Z 28_. ��� f 34,'' 1 1--------- I--993-- 78171_ l O 31``, 20' ST FSMT. - h 5.E I` hm m 65448.E IN y 6500S.F, N N Q N I `Si `;q 55 __I _ ___ _1 _ " ti _ 65005.E - ,p _ I -- - --- -- ----- - - ----------- t,- -- - { rn'N i " f " " 43', < 6500 Nn 9R -6760S.F {_� f 3 _ I 700 S;F ,n w w I -.'Oo -n 1 R u�i 150' I - 126' 125' l 125' I' I `,-----z--z� ----�_--- 85738.E ` J J 125' LLLLyy211� 13Q I - `. 9 35 h 5 - r --- ,zs''I� 24 I9 98, 1._9g Z Z 5D' 130' { h 78348.E 5 2 3d S.F qui w 7008.E o 421 - 5,4 - 96 S.F I " w W r 65dO,S.F 9 N N N J o Z Z 1 Z Z " " N 60 S.F I I" z K o I .,g - -29 ST ESMT.J '650 S.F J ��' �9 47 °° m --Z-Z r N - J'- 153' 0 h ''` 25 BU CD LINE Z O 25' zs' C7 !O ' N w NJ 4 N I N _ 2' 15'BUI D LINE '` '` �Q w � --_�--------- -' ��-p - w 125 ]30' - }I �Z z 8053S.F `° - -- f ------- 107641 2 p 3 �� I2- vi �w� o I' Z`Z o�g� \' r- -------- 2 --- sk \�s ssP cEs f m N 36 1 N 6s ols s m N J J 48 1 �- > > 13 I 53-''� o' I _ _ I �� ------ - 650Sf--------- S.F _ - T' I//-� C=999.7 'nom. 700 SF ----ry 'n N vp v>Z Z N N _ N Q _ 98 6760 a y w - o I ,� ' N SIDEWALK EASEMENT I !� '`�- --- ; " p n �' IN O INV=993.86 /,' bT h J 1' `w w O _ 5 - - - _-- - - - ---------$573S.F V 1 / \ - - y 125'-- "---- I 125' 130',,, EMMET ROW,LANE �w Z > > �1 H 2 j �t \ > ---------37-- N 49 - _ 52 <I _ " N 1 1 40 -1 003' . Sj p ",� 14' 52' 66' 58' I O N 650 S.F N v ,���� 700 S,# v r^ 6500 S.F '�iv -1 Q iV J _ -- = MIST ESM1ITT_ - 15' L DING LINE "` " UI I " " Op_- 676Q5:F " - - \� _ -1- 0 o 25' B I IN, - , L - - 20' ST ESMT. - _ U�------------ `� 'II - _ - ��� o I 125 -_-- - - - - - - 1 130' o 15' SA ESMT. I { 725' (• = 125' -'-- i- 1g0 9 ; N o I - - - I I I � a N 1-----1002----- ' s 2 CN __ 38 - I $0 51 r 2' 6 1 N 39 r - 8s I rn n 22' 21 20 19'`, 1 9017 S.F 8916 S.F '{� `�" "' 9295 S.F n ' 94558.E _ 35 SF R w 10394�.F S.F 585S.F 101S.F ,-" 8134 8 8580 S.F I m ; s - -25' BBY IL ING LINE T l , 11 25' BUIL )ING LINE 25 '- 107 rq TC=998.5 N �� •`.\ THE BOARD OF L . I INv=993.38 `9g) 1 9S moi. \` 15' BUILDIN LINE 15' BUILDING LINE EDUCATION OF THE DUBLIN M O ,-''' \'P��� -- - - �oo CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT z�, .-- " "r 5 , I I '`,5 SP C S --8'4$6 S.F N 12.433 AC. (DEED) - ---- p S ACES 62 62' 66' \ 6' 55' r N o O.R. 609, P. 601 I, r 311, % , \ SIDEWALK EASEMENT ---�_- - - • SIDEWALK EASEMENT / y, _9g, N .: ... ... :a ... y. .. it I -- 2 - - RESERVE A 51' , 6 ' 66' 66' 64' 64' •62' 66' 15' BUILD G LINE SERV ' 25' BU LD NG LINE I m I - ---- 15 S - . AC DRAINAGE � EASEMENT\ '`g A ESMT. • +% 2 RES \'\ X99 .I"'- I �, 92- '99 ` RESERVE ++/q++ ' �`� - (,� \ 1r •`off B' WIDEASPHALT ` - ±7.2 ACRES 7p9a s:E, 16 }5 1 ^ { y 14 13 12 n 7730. 11� �= (y 9 i 960 S,F PEDESTRIAN PATH �9 •••7750 S.F 8250 SF 0 050 S.F 8000 SF 800 S.F $.F `,8249 S.Y � 8466 ST N BASIN Ol \ '� '` 3'-5' EARTHEN I MOUND 62' 66' 66' 64' 64' 62' 66' 66' 62' ` ..:�... bao - \ 20' ST ESMT. 1 20' ST ESMT. 4 y��... ` - -=s ------ ----------- 1- - / IPEDESTRIAN PATH a �8' WIDE ASPHALT � EXISTING 20' GAS St _ PEDESTRIAN PATH EASEMENT EASEMENT iTBRi '� In _ EXISTING - PEDESTRIAN ------ 8'WIDEASPHALT o TRAIL - - - - , RIGHT-OF-WAY --___ PEDESTRIAN PATH o PEDESTRIAN PATH -� ,T ,-T _ i -- ---- ----- _ - - - - - 3' S' EARTHEN EASEMENT -------- 1 - - - 13.77 - MOUND -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ---o - -- - - PEDESTRIAN PATH ----- ------ _- - EASEMENT - -------------- --- -__----_ -- --- -- - - _---- ------------- ------------ , N06'05'59"W 1382.30' - A {SOY_ L} - _ - -_ , � l HY��1�-£ -------- ROA _ , REVISIONS CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO 023/ DESCRIPTIONmomm PRELIMINARY PLAT ,07237,9 REVISEC)EERSTAFF COMMENTS ROMANELLI &HUGHES FOR nT2v,9 REwseoPER STAFF COMMENTS Engie, SWgrHambleton Inc. 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD 01/21/20 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS Engineers - Surveyors -Planners • Scientists WESTERV LLE, OHIO 43081 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 T H E OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 SITE PLAN emhuom ae�® SITE STATISTICS: TOTAL ACREAGE: ±23.98 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 56 GROSS DENSITY: ±2.33 LOT\ACRE OPEN SPACE: ROAD. ELEVATION = 929.66 REQUIRED: 3.56 ACRES PROVIDED: ±7.7 ACRES RESERVE "A": ±7.2 ACRES RESERVE "B": ±0.2 ACRES RESERVE C": ±0.1 ACRES RESERVE"D": ±0.1 ACRES RESERVE E": ±0.1 ACRES ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MINIMUM LOT AREA: 6,500 SQ. FT. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 52 FEET (AT BUILDING LINE) BUILDING SETBACKS �k FRONT YARD/ BUILDING LINE: 25MINIMUM �k FRONT YARD/ COURTYARD GARAGE OR PORCH: 15MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 6MINIMUM EACH SIDE REAR YARD: 25MINIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 35' MAXIMUM �k OR OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT NOTES: NOTE "A": RESERVE "A" SHALL BE OWNED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND MAINTAINED BY THE TARTAN RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. THE OVERLOOK STRUCTURE AND ASSOCIATED PATH ADJACENT TO THE RETENTION BASIN WITHIN RESERVE "A", SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE HOMEOWNERS SUB -ASSOCIATION. NOTE "B": ALL EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC AND QUASI PUBLIC UTILITIES WILL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL PLAT. OPEN SPACE CALCULATION: SECTION 152.086 OPEN SPACE (2% OF THE TOTAL GROSS AREA PLUS 0.03 ACRES / UNIT) (27o OF 23.98 ACRES) + (56 X 0.03 ACRES) = 2.16 ACRES SECTION 152.087 OPEN SPACE (NUMBER OF LOTS X 0.025 ACRES) (56 X 0.025 ACRES) = 1.4 ACRES) TOTAL OPEN SPACE REQUIRED = 3.56 ACRES BENCH MARKS: (NAVD 1988) MASTER BM ALUMINUM DISK IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HYLAND-CROY ROAD BRIDGE OVER NORTH FORK INDIAN RUN, 107 FT. SOUTH OF THE C/L OF MITCHELL & DEWITT ROAD. 20 FT. WEST OF THE C/L OF HYLAND-CROY ROAD. ELEVATION = 929.66 SOURCE BM TRAVERSE IRON PIN #9003, NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF HYLAND-CROY ROAD & McKITRICK ROAD. ELEVATION = 1004.23 BM# 1 RAILROAD SPIKE SET IN EAST SIDE OF UTILITY POLE ON WEST SIDE OF JEROME ROAD AND 880.5'+/- NORTH SIDE OF INTERSECTION OF McKITRICK ROAD AND JEROME ROAD. ELEVATION = 1011.72 BM#2 RAILROAD SPIKE SET IN SOUTH SIDE OF 12" TREE, 25'+/- SOUTH SIDE OF SECTION LINE AND 500'+/- WEST SIDE OF JEROME ROAD. ELEVATION = 992.54 BM#3 RAILROAD SPIKE SET IN SOUTH SIDE OF 18" TREE, 1750'+/- EAST SIDE OF HYLAND-CROY ROAD AND 15'+/- NORTH SIDE OF SECTION LINE. ELEVATION = 1002.32 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 1 inch = 60 feet Date Job No. LOCATED IN: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 20190043 VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME scale Sheet 1"=60' 3/7 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE k ..i J / J ------ ---= -- \ `lA ,� _--219----------- - -a_ _ A --- \I _ -__-"f = -_ =-_ - --- - - L J — — -- = - V L , - - —� � els ��_ I - 1t\,/fes 4ESTRI NPATFT - / /.' L L ,B9 J / - 220 \- \ RESERVER,- 203 J / L 190 I / / \ : / 996 J I ,o. 'J /; � \ - ---__- % PEDESTRIAN TRAIL TO I I L.'' L J L 08^x' CONNECT O THE '� EXISTING TRAIL' N THE -- --- z�I Q ~: IIlk ��'� , SOUTH SIDE OF ENFIELD �%4 I — J , x'202 � � � I I , ', " -- , 1 L; L J 191 J , _ I' a o ( I , o I'`, ,/ 0-13'47'31" - j z 3 R=274.99' -- r I, J - - Ara=66.1 s' ' I ChB=S13'22'15'E, I' L a ° EXISTING BASIN ChD -66.03' J I''`, f' I' �. r I 222 201 / ----- -- I _ _ / BE MODIFIED) S215551W S06'28'31'1 4' ' - _ L 192 I S r% 35.50' S51'28'31 °E 40.00' 1- d I an 35.36' 'Et '`1' w ' , 1 9 �3- � 5��5059 Q, 4_ �' QF -L I Ify EX1STING,B'- 1 I L J I 193 oa /EP ASPR T / BASIN 02 4=7.39'08" V ---------- LU L o PEDES f RIAN PATH ,%I 0 i x ,o ''e , fI� NWE=992.0 R=275.00' W 200 - 22 o s.o All Fr 3 � Arc -36.73' �I , I O 7 z, ChB=S45'O5'32°E 0 zo U /� ChD -36.70" --__- Ex 24"St� Ex 24"ST 6c 15"ST t Ex 12"ST- - YJ I%I TC=, 00, .7 , St ' 1 Y G INV=995.24 5 �A EX STAPLETON PLACE - / _Ex 24'ST = ,.� J CITY OF DUBLIN,'' -'Io=4rs2'2s" / s, _RESERVE"A"---- - - - �I v n R=198.31' f , /r , sr o o (— Arc= ±7.2 ACRES____ rt - I ,�� a .' ChB-S27'58'54"E OogN II W h ,_ / ---/ ChD=141.73' PEDESTRIAN PATH Z I L L L RESERVE rQr; , I' / ; I EASEMENT''' - I 11 22d . ,°I J;' I I'�. ITTD PEDFSTRIAPROPONEPATH �._ St _ -� _ y'�'��' +., CO > I - _ I 'h'- R 1225 00'. _ �.. ----i��_ --:- / ''�" \ \'t _ '° ''r5 > 3 y y y � r ' in ��° - Arc=4.06'�r \ '''' . 1 _ 1 J 1 I -_ _ - 1 CO 199 I L L 194 7L \ 3'-5'EART� �l E _ HEN O ,iS ' S38'S4'01 "W,-' ChB-S0T33'42"E t ------- / ` \ 1 8 J J 196 195 I 35.36' ChD -4.0 - TARTAN -- - - PEDESTRIAN PATH •. / \ \\ ___�- TARTAN RIDGE I .I 1 i - / 1 \ ' _ -- - MOUND lI SECTION S PART 2 - V 1009.96 - L� L IS I EASEMENT Y `, / y i \ f, \ r Tc -,002.6s _9 , s L97 L I o �5 ST 0702'41 "E------- EXISTING P.B. S, P. 315 �� - 1 / ----- _ - 01 INV=996.94 �� 'RESERVE"E++225 r w,s-Ex1TST I2sT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYTO TC=laosso � �SO6.O5'59"E 181.92'-'-' --"- 49.12' ��� \ I I =" / r ACRES V=1,00013 - PAVEMBEVA ETREMOVED INV=993.84 1 ,_.I_. ±0.1 AI..REQ ' TC=1002.69 y ,, , — , 7 Fx 8" WM-- ( I — 8 SO o WM�in ; WMy. �. y'. z ED w ' INV=996.66 '� Fx 12"ST TC=1003.36 Ex 12"ST — - _-___ J'� — ___�__ S06'05'59"E �- - INV -1000.33 - - -s' EARTHEN�» I 1 -d, w INV=994.74 150.37' - ,g Tc=,002.6, ,a EX BR NHAM WAY to LMOUND --- - _--- __--_-- --- -- —�- - _ - - -- -o� INV=996.91 Ex15"ST-SO6'05'59"E 416.66'- z00 ---_ ,---_---/------ -" - _ _ ", / ,4 - Ex 2a'ST 0 0 ,9 __ -- -RESER— VE '+ 1"A RE—6cB^sa �(cc-,4456)— TC=1006.10 s M118"Sa C-14456 'R)-�E$�RV�' ±0.1 R r O --- --- -- TExiB°sa=f--$cc-144s6r- _ ' EASEMENT 4 — �! IN = EXISTING - - - `-___ 4 I', ,--1, -S83.54'O1"W- ---I-- -i-- _ WM V 993.50 z I �+'" PEDESTRIAN PATH I 36.74' - -- S51.O5'59'E_ 3'-5' EARTHEN RESERVE "C'" 44 2 — — — — -- 35.36' MOUND 3'-s' EARTHEN 26�', �', �1. � � ±0.1 ACRES EXISTING SANITARY _ - 45 '" r" ' ' MOUND I I 7 ( 1 - I TO BE REMOVED �-- _ n - _ _ - ---"-_ - _ SO6'05'59°E 1 2 32, .-I'" �.-'- 50.00' 3 I'__ 3+ - - - - ----}----------'" �b I - 20' ST ESMT. - sT sT - " - - - I 9jj O LEGEND Illn stmIll Proposed Storm Sewer CB MH -SanSery San Proposed Sanitary Sewer MH Water Sew WM FH Proposed Watermain VIV F N ----------------- EL IIHi19�R _ 2 3T, T EMT. 625 4 55 - Nj OOI 43 3 _ II im_3 U— ' I i 1 IN I I Q QII I H 39 ; f ------------------ 47 - N „ 9 1 0 ,n '- � - "� ' I U 24 I 29 9a- �'. 30 Y I 35 1 F , 42;' a_; 47 0 5 S4 cT . O I r J I N I I \-20'ST ESMT.J 011 - --- ----- ___4__- 1 `"3 �� Z � , J - --- N.-' H 23' I 36 1 48 1- F 53 Q� 3 --------------------- <-9 _ - to -TJ ------- �r INV=993.86 I �\ WM y~ — — — — I ___________ __n h H - _______________------ .4b" JI7/ IIS SIDEWALK FASE{v1E�T I y 98 (, I ---- 4 �EMMET I�pW LANE ' / IN 1 ti 49- 52 i 5 / .100' yos�� sa sa I I 1 °° 3 I F'--7ooa —=20'SrFSMT_— 1 -- —� �' 1 zu o L — — — St — — St a 2o5sTFS sl - - ------ o 15' SA ESMT. J + MT. I ^ L Lq 00 i 38 — ---� 51 T r I 1 f r 39 I 50' 6 Ir2 � r w 211 20 19 1'$ 1 1 h 1 TC=998.5 ,9 ; N `�9 THE BOARD OF/lNV=993.38 9>, EDUCATION OF THE DUBLIN I M -- 1 1 996,------------=-� -�- --- ---� 'oo CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT z 1\ WM I WM ] x '� 12.433 AC. (DEED) O.R. 609, P. 601 I; _ SIDEWALK EASEMENT SIpEWAL,FASEMENT _ '� --- -- -- - - 4' 9 S Sa - Tom- g9 Ilk- " -' 15 SA ESMT.EASEMENT 15 SA ESMT. --- RESERVED n A n' t A RESERVE "„ b � 99 h'` h ±7,2 ACRES 998WIDE ASPHALT ±7.2 ACRES S 1 ]` 16 15 :f y 14 13 12'1.1 1'a, 8'` PEDESTRIAN PATH 5---- - ` o BASIN Ol -- '� '` 3' NWE, -s' EARTHEN = 9926 MOUND 7.0 AC. FT ,� I, l \ y ., 20' ST ESMT. St ST ST ST 0St STi�� �..• •.. .:I ... ,� J "'T� X66 o ... 20' ST EXISTING 20' GAS St - � 0 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN 8' WIDE ASPHALT T TRAIL PEDESTRIAN PATH_--- - _ - - _ _ - -- 8' WIDER---- ' - --- - + -' _ - - -- --------- ---- - - - - -� - RIGHT OF WAY PEDESTRIAN PATH PEDESTRIAN PATH % - ---- ------ 3' S' EARTHEN EASEMENT �- - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOUND - - - - - -- --------------- _4 _ - - _ - - -- GRAPHIC SCALE ---FD - -- - - PEDESTRIAN PATH _ _ _ T 0 - r -- _------------------_--------------,✓--__ -__-- - -- - - - ---------- -_- -- --- - - - _ ------------------ - - - ---- - -- -- - - - - - - - -------------- - - '---- a ------------ ------ --- _ --- ----- -- -- -- _ -_ - -- ----- _EAS -- - - -- -- -- - -- - - - ------ EMENT _ 0 30 60 120 06'05'59"W 1382.30 ___--- - _ _ _ _ ___-_-- __ _ ___ - --'-__ - - __ _ __ ____--_ _ - - ___-__ ____- _____-__________ ______-------_---_- —___ __ _ __ _ __r __ __ _ - _ _ 1 inch 60 feet 4_______ _c___ __ - _ __ _ _ - ____ _ _ _ _ - ------------ -�- - - -- -- -- -- 1-� -- -- -- ---- -- ^-�= -- -- -- --� T -� REVISIONS CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO Date Job No. DESCRIPTION DAATE TE RISEDPEmomm PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED IN: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 20190043 oDEVRSTAFFcoMMFN ROMANELLI &HUGHES FOR 11/2111/21/19T2,9 RFwseDPFRSTAFFCOMMENTS 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 01/21/20 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS EEngineers ginevans, Mechwart, - Planners 8. Scientists Inc. T H E OVERLOOK A T TARTAN RIDGE Scale Sheet 5500 e w • bSurveyorsRa •Planners • OH354 W ESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 1"=60' 4/7 emht,com PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE 8 -------2199----- ---- - ,a_ A--- - _ - - -L / ^ _ L �L JII ---------- _J004__ 7004--__ rI - r \ �9 �y? / J ----- -- L ,89 --- L ---- 9' , s - -- __ j' 220 �'/�;' -/. RESERVE`"R.. 19 203 III \y 11II / I 'o J`\ _ \ a ,\PEDESTRIA TRAILTO I / L,.'' L J / L I - 08'` ! �',, l - i0 T, ti- CONNECTT THE - I - - - - - ' - �- - \ �'� EXISTING TRAIL bN THE ' IELD /I I _ ISI SII I \ \ SOUTFI SIDE OF ENE I^, 221 I 1 �, / %.. Q <T ^ ,202 L TSI I 9, I`' II i o T 1 L � J , II Inv= 2.82 = - 3J J 99 J J W an 'u1 pI t P t ' Q -� "'�_ - .A�11'� EXISTING BASIN (TBR)' XISTING��, (TO BE MODIFIED) - 0 ! O PE 'S �I ATH' 1 201 I 192 DE AJV I Inv= m - 222 - J; Ito L J I I I ; 991.24 1 to O I I Z Q I OUTLET 03-_ _ T - W J IIx , I' / ,,' ;/ STRUCTURE rlI_ QUI' '�'I1,/ r io = o z -- - - f 200 TF _ I�I I ''� ;I'i1,-"f;" s 11';' _ _ n I J x 193 0l / BASIN 02 ? f 7 l }� $ L I W J L o;' ^oa^ NWE=992.0 /' D• 0 223 ^' I 91, , I' ' I I � 5.0 AC. FT �I U I L I RESERVE, 'Q� h !' ./ --- - - _ 7 12" stm --_ Ex 24"ST�Fx 24"St Fx 15"St I / INV=90024 F,,,z^'St EX STAPLETON PLACE _ RESERVE "A" ---- - ' o o - o' o M o"- CITY OF DUBLIN,' 1 , o / / "�?j �+1" ti`'ACRES ��I 'a,.-' ;' ;' I �• �'/ 990;bh Inv=985.0 '�IInv=984.31,''/ W I o ^� o IEK PEDESTRIAN PATH - tol 1 f 2zd` + z 1 f L Ll I 1` - EASEMENT / - I --- h' \ �8,$. r n1/-983.78± N� �, h I I I I I R ��"-J off- - '_ -- - - `. 194 3 8 a ',� 0 ^ \ ' , - - Oj o 3- n. zo 199 " - ------ 9 \ `_------ _ ` � TARTAN RIDGE I `I 198 J 197 ! 196 III 195 I d I ;, > /I o / �__-_ / -PEDESTRIAN PATH ,� / 9°j \ \ - _ EASEMENT ' SECTION 5 PART 2 L _ _ L EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY TO y0 `� 9� \ \ _ EARTHEN I' P.B. 5, P. 315 'I/ Tc=too2.6s�-Tc=tao4.to_ 2e L --- L BE VACATED / 5 ----� 0�i __-""_\- ----- MOUND INV=999.96 - LT _ L_ _ •� $f ✓ 9 i,•�• �i0� -- - - 225 , s' INV=996.94 - -- (PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED) _ _ _ - - _ -- - _ RESERVE"E" W �I2°sr - Ex 12"St eti •� 1 I' �. _0.1 ACRES' ' 'TC=t002.69' -I C=1003.36 EX 8" WMEi(B E - w�i7 1003.51 1oo2.ao 1°°191 z,c;lool i7 ' y', 3`, 997.69',' %(� �6 sso.2 ��� Z 1003.3 _ TC -1003.76 1004.7 _ 1005.0 _ + INV=996.66 5 ��I,,I��� 8"S°� 99 Z 1 IN =1001 5 4 L '� y �,1 TC=1002.61. ' INV=1000.33 - -I - -"� .68 , `__-________ __ _ Tc -loo°. Inv=99691 a 3'-5' EARTHEN gszss 1005.30 ;'2.15X� 1•S 1001.27 3.50 997 --- H 74 MOUND ---r - - I I w u, / Ex 15"St 1TSt •/002.8 - 1004.4 -'- �- � 6 --�-__ --- - {I', - - - - 1003.51 IX 2o'sT f 5�_� -Ex 8" Sa�(CC-14456)- TC=1006.10 -' -' CC-, 4456 'RES RV ' ±0.1-Ex18^ sa =/= ->Ccc-14456) ^•"" SERVE D° Ex 18"Sa -EASEMENT D 4 + ,WM �<INV=993.50 2 RIM -- ACRE O a 4 RE 1 s " EXISTING _ :N - ' I K - 1002.0_ 1221 PEDESTRIAN PATH - l _ -RIM= - -{---- RIM= RESERVE "C" T+° _ 3'-5' EARTHEN - - - ___--- -- 995.2 to MOUND e ° - 26 II n II a II r1`1 995.6 n o �__ I O! II n 2 U Ao o �� _ z fig._ 2�-_- 32 �� s , sg ' ±0.1 ACRES 44 '�' o ti ° 0 45' f.� 56 " '� _---- o T I Q' 33 r - EXISTING SANITARY -_o---- _ - _ RIM= _-f__===_____=- ' O1 r r TO BE REMOVED ST _ 996.0 - _-_____ I ', y h o RIM= _ - _ _ 0' - - _ 20' ST FSMT O - --- - - - n I pi pi i n F- Ii '0_ 3 'IOI ,1001.5 r -� I a -- ,I 25 0 3 B y j 31 II Mi Y l0 101 II ,; m i o T - 99�"RiM- �L ; Fz �, �g `8 cog O N' 1 h -�0 34 , 43'',M 3' n' `99x 55 °� �0 L" °m sss.o :46 LU r o o f ''t",- w y RIM= O h Ido �W �0,_ $ 1 [Y b o E o Lo,w 01 - 1001.3 � __ II 01 w I a 35 N O �I SG I" tIF a U 24 8 a4 c ` 29'`. 30 Q°° o O` �o o n" a 1 ; 42 r 0 M Q i II M 47 y ._ 54 a , p - _a la 'C50 f9 Ol, I U' O �� O Oi _ ��I�i' o', C7 I .S1 p Q QQ - r BRIM=.. 20'STESMT. _-' i ni _ - _ -- RIM=._- °'_ "-- SIDEWALk`EASEMENT St __-___ o ¢- ` RI RIM- ___-__'_- 1002.7 Ito o Q , 0 1 1rn - _1 w J ,N O -997.5- U N 23c - �'°Oa r _WMA 8 n m �� a „ I -997.9 Jt 3� >� 1oo1.a7 �o -- �o O o ° �g 48 _ �9a h TC=999.7 _ 36 Inv=993.a6 �i h so '??i RIM- 6 \ 5 1000.93 `, 4 I y a o " r o, w 464; 1001 o I '41 '1 I s - \ 5 d 1 i ��� \ , 5002.4 1001.59 0•SOX ',1000.93 3 o " OI N M I n o' x o I 37 `° `° 52 ------ `�S RIM= / GA S Sa 15'SAESMT I O °, II O 40'' II Mo 3 n� c "-49 F' _,I- -n o 0 1 W _-1003 1002.2 RIM= RIM= �o %coo I �o '-- 000._--- - 4�0. "a, z 1004.02 1002.2 1001.3 J RIM= - - oo RIM= St -I 29 ST ESMT. I ¢ w t I m S'� ' o.,y nF 1000.7.- -i-- I - - - - - - RIM= I of - 20' ST ESMT. St - 998.4`( o ' 00 1 1003. 1003 = - 3g h I o n 01 �0 51 N 0 6 ooa.o G^ I 18 .4 1003.1 r a .{ KIM w o 39 Il Nj o; o ^� - TC=996.5 24 F I` 1000.4' RIM= t�o O �' C4 'I J 1000.41, .\ y - 1 RIM= ;1 INv=993.38 SIDEWALK E EMEI T S W AS , N1001.9- EDUCATION ,N THE BOARD OF � 2 ', 2O � = ST 01.9.� _ - EDUCATIONOFTHEDUBLINI U CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT -' RIM- ; �6J��;' -- - 999♦ i) '999.87 PArFrIz WM I WM °' 7 oio' �o._- 7 . 12.433 AC. (DEED) ' , O.R. 609, P. 601 I;' --- 1001.6 Rj , 4 1.00 5 1000.74 6 '7 SIDEWALK EASEMENT -8 1000.08 , - P - - --` - __-• 8 _ .. h 0 i i 9 8 -- 1 000 000 8- -I 'SAESMT.�y 0 X - RIMO= I SOX 9 5 1001.90 1000.08 �r 1.38% .80 ' RIM- -' LEGEND stm Proposed Storm CB MH Sewer __SanSery Proposed Sanitary Son Sewer MH II Water Sery FH Proposed WMY Watermain Vlv ExStm I Existing Storm _ ExCB ExMH Sewer IIII--sansery Existing Sanitary I ExSan ,_, Sewer ExMH C7�ExWater Y Sery ExFH Existing _L_,__ ExWM__y _ Watermain ExVly Existing Minor 921 Contours Existing Major __________920___________ Contours Proposed Minor 901 Contours Proposed Major 905 Contours GA= Ground Around Elevation (TBR) To Be Removed --------------RIM= 15' SA ESMT. $O RIM= 'SO - - 999.3 999.9 1001.8 N . . . � RESERVE "A" I -- -_ EASEMENT '� \`� 5 �_ ,% \'- ., J 1 0 6 f \ cA= ` cn= GA= GA= cn= cA- cA= GA= GA - 1002.4 A r ±7.2 ACRES RESERVE "A S� RIM= 1001.5 1001.8 1002.3-' 1003.0 .1003.9 1003.4 1002.9 1002.4 'i 1001.9 100 B' WIDEASPHALT ±7.2 ACRES - 999.5 `^ ; � I `, H �'. -PEDESTRIAN PSH 1' 8 ,I i BASIN of j'7 1 b 15 14; 13 12 11 '`,10 f g 3'-s EARTHEN a NWE,= 992.5 MOUND 7.0'Ac-Ft 99 /' OUTLET S -RIM= _- '--- -'I RIM= RIM= RIM= RIM- RIM- 'pl' I •` STRUCTURE - 999.7 - 1000.6 1001.7 1001.0 1000.1', - 999.7 \•'ST-=" ST ------ St ---- St ------- St --`_' St L52,0' ST ESMT. _ 20' ST ESMT. 8' WIDE EXISTING 20' GAS "O"St _ 0 ... PEDESTRIAN P EASEMENT (18 R) EXISTING ti� ;1 PEDESTRIAN I I_ _ 8' WIDE;4SPHALT 3'-5' EARTHEN ' TRAIL - --___ ------ - ---_ - Pf1IDE S PATH PEDESTRIAN PATH / MOUND EASEMENT n1/=990.80 - ____-__ -�- --- --- -- i-- ------'------ - ---------------------- ------------- --------------- - - --------i----� - w � _ = GRAPHIC SCALE - Inv -990.33 - T ---o - - - - _ ------------ PEDESTRIAN PATH 0 -----' _ iw - - -- ---- ------------------- - - " --------- - - - -- --. -- - - - - --== - ---- ------------------------K ---- -- - -- - ---- - _- __- - - ------ ------------- '---- "_---'------ -- --- - -- -- --- - - - ------ - -" - - -' -- '-------------------------------- - EASEMENT --- -- - --- --- -- -- -_-_- -- ---_ - -- - - -- - 0 30 60 120 ______________________ - - _ __ _ -- ___ _ _ __ _ _ 11nch - 60 feet """ - __ - - __ - - _______ -_ ______- - - - - - _ - -_ - -- -_ - __ --_ - _ - _-' Inv 989.80 � _-' �'. `� �` _ REVISIONS CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO Date Job No. DATE REVISEDPEN momm PRELIMINARY PLAT 20/23/29 RFwseDPFRSTAFFconnnnFNTs ROMANELLI &HUGHES FOR LOCATED IN: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 20190043 01/21/29 REVISED PERSTAFFCOMMENTS VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 01/21/20 RFwSFO PFRSTAFF COMMENTS Evaneers - Surveyors w°rtors - Plannerston Scientists Inc. 148 WEST SCHROGK ROAD THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE sale sheet Engineers • b n Road, •Planners • OH H43l5 W ESTERV LLE, OHIO 43081 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 1"=60' 5/7 emht.com PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE �� F-1 II I 7—T/ L � JI I'I 0 11 p J -L L J , 'I m I �I11 II 1 w III_ IIII;I II ---- __�J I Iz IIS �z�_j---1 III° L � J I I I _ I �, Q �II11 L L� 1 111 x W \ \ 80 8 / / X9� 93 997 98 102 ; \\ I' I78 77 76 86'_ 10475 2 �� '^ 8�96 7 91 94 \ X 90 100 101 / 103 I 108 I II109 TREE FENCING (TYP) 1 1 0 1;1 t I 113 112 114 115 j 1 I / 116 / 117 54 1 �1 • it ,..63 -64 32 1111111111111117 111 R MOUND 35 • ` y32 30 37 • • • LU• • • �MIIIIIIIIIIiff ROW LANE FENCING (TYP) 22 1 21 I I I I 1 I I I I I 20 i\ 19 18 I I � I I I I RESERVE "K ±7.2 ACRES 17 I 1 I I I 1 45 I I 1 46 I 47 I I 1 48 I 49 16 RESERVE "C" 3'-5' EARTH N 12 11 1 33 ±0.1 ACRES 20/23/29 44 MOUND 01/21/20 REVISED PERSTAFFCOCOMMENTS CALL (614) 410-4600. RFwSFO PFRSTAFF COMMENTS % 2. THE CITY IS TO BE CONTACTED IF FENCE LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED OR PRIOR I I r 34 � 1 43 Q U 1 I U w I i Z WOOD CRZ OR N QI I I RAILS 15' RADIUS U , 35 5 WHICHEVER 1 1 42 r Z L QUARE IS GREATER J 1 TIES AT 1' O.C. �1 v GRADE I OMME = STEEL FENCE STAKE AT 6' O.C. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR — ---%� 1 =I I 36 I 1 41 I 1 1 I 1 37 I 40 1 L r I 38 1 1 39 � J I I I 17 I 1 I I I 1 45 I I 1 46 I 47 I I 1 48 I 49 3'-5' EARTHEN MOUND TREE FENCING RESERVE"A" ±7.2 ACRES X-5EARTHEN MOUND 8 TREE FENCING (TY P) 16 v 19 � 21 20 X23122 15 26 / HYLAND-CROY ROAD ■ l II I I I � II I I I I I I I I I TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: I EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED >:24' (LANDMARK) 73" DBH (2 TREES) / 3.0" (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 25 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED 6" TO <24' (PROTECTED) 545" DBH (51 TREES) / 3.0 (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 182 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0 CAL.) e TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES = 207 TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) I 1 TREES TO BE REMOVED I TREES 3, 4, 11, 20, 85, 89-91 AND 93 ARE ASH TREES AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS TREES 18, 19, 37, 42, 74, 79, 81-84, 93,99 AND 128 ARE IN POOR CONDITION AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS I I — I TREE PRESERVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY FENCING AROUND TREE PRESERVATION AREAS SO THAT ALL PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE PRESERVED. THE FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED A DISTANCE FROM THE TRUNK THAT EQUALS, AT A MINIMUM, THE DISTANCE OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OR 15 FEET, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. WHERE 114 PHYSICAL SITE CONSTRAINTS DO NOT ALLOW FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS AND METHODS SHALL BE DETERMINED ON SITE, WITH THE CONSULTATION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR. CALL 410-4600 FOR TREE FENCING INSPECTION. 1 2. FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE SECURED IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION DURING THE ENTIRE 1 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO PREVENT THE IMPINGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, MATERIALS, I SPOILS, AND EQUIPMENT INTO OR UPON THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. — 3. TREE PRESERVATION SIGNS, AVAILABLE FROM THE DIVISION OF LAND USE AND LONG RANGE PLANNING, MUST BE LOCATED ALONG THE FENCING. ANY CHANGE IN PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF LAND USE AND LONG RANGE PLANNING. 4. THE APPROVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON THE BUILDING SITE BEFORE WORK COMMENCES AND AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING ALL CONTRACTORS AND UTILITIES. 5. DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL STEPS TO PREVENT THE DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE TO PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE TAKEN. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MOVEMENT AND/OR PLACEMENT OF 1 Q EQUIPMENT, VEHICLES, MATERIALS OR SPOILS STORAGE SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE w PRESERVATION AREA. NO EXCESS SOIL, ADDITIONAL FILL, LIQUIDS, OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF ALL TREES THAT ARE TO BE PRESERVED. i 6. NO ATTACHMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ROPES, NAILS, ADVERTISING POSTERS, SIGNS, FENCES, OR WIRES (OTHER THAN THOSE USED FOR BRACING, GUYING OR WRAPPING) SHALL BE �L ATTACHED TO ANY TREE. U 7. NO GASEOUS LIQUIDS OR SOLID SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE HARMFUL TO TREES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. Cj 8. NO FIRE OR HEAT SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. 9. ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING SERVICE LINES, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. I I I I I I 16 1 I I I 15 1 I I I F I I I 1 14 I I I 13 12 11 I I I 10 1 I I I 'J I I I j 9 I I I DESCRIPTION 20/23/29 1. INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED. 01/21/20 3'-5' EARTHEN MOUND TREE FENCING RESERVE"A" ±7.2 ACRES X-5EARTHEN MOUND 8 TREE FENCING (TY P) 16 v 19 � 21 20 X23122 15 26 / HYLAND-CROY ROAD ■ l II I I I � II I I I I I I I I I TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: I EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED >:24' (LANDMARK) 73" DBH (2 TREES) / 3.0" (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 25 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED 6" TO <24' (PROTECTED) 545" DBH (51 TREES) / 3.0 (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 182 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0 CAL.) e TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES = 207 TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) I 1 TREES TO BE REMOVED I TREES 3, 4, 11, 20, 85, 89-91 AND 93 ARE ASH TREES AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS TREES 18, 19, 37, 42, 74, 79, 81-84, 93,99 AND 128 ARE IN POOR CONDITION AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS I I — I TREE PRESERVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY FENCING AROUND TREE PRESERVATION AREAS SO THAT ALL PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE PRESERVED. THE FENCING SHALL BE LOCATED A DISTANCE FROM THE TRUNK THAT EQUALS, AT A MINIMUM, THE DISTANCE OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OR 15 FEET, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. WHERE 114 PHYSICAL SITE CONSTRAINTS DO NOT ALLOW FOR SUCH INSTALLATION, TREE PROTECTION LOCATIONS AND METHODS SHALL BE DETERMINED ON SITE, WITH THE CONSULTATION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR. CALL 410-4600 FOR TREE FENCING INSPECTION. 1 2. FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE SECURED IN AN UPRIGHT POSITION DURING THE ENTIRE 1 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO PREVENT THE IMPINGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES, MATERIALS, I SPOILS, AND EQUIPMENT INTO OR UPON THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. — 3. TREE PRESERVATION SIGNS, AVAILABLE FROM THE DIVISION OF LAND USE AND LONG RANGE PLANNING, MUST BE LOCATED ALONG THE FENCING. ANY CHANGE IN PROTECTIVE FENCING MUST BE APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF LAND USE AND LONG RANGE PLANNING. 4. THE APPROVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON THE BUILDING SITE BEFORE WORK COMMENCES AND AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING ALL CONTRACTORS AND UTILITIES. 5. DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION, ALL STEPS TO PREVENT THE DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE TO PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE TAKEN. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MOVEMENT AND/OR PLACEMENT OF 1 Q EQUIPMENT, VEHICLES, MATERIALS OR SPOILS STORAGE SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE w PRESERVATION AREA. NO EXCESS SOIL, ADDITIONAL FILL, LIQUIDS, OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF ALL TREES THAT ARE TO BE PRESERVED. i 6. NO ATTACHMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ROPES, NAILS, ADVERTISING POSTERS, SIGNS, FENCES, OR WIRES (OTHER THAN THOSE USED FOR BRACING, GUYING OR WRAPPING) SHALL BE �L ATTACHED TO ANY TREE. U 7. NO GASEOUS LIQUIDS OR SOLID SUBSTANCES WHICH ARE HARMFUL TO TREES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. Cj 8. NO FIRE OR HEAT SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE TREE PRESERVATION AREA. 9. ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING SERVICE LINES, SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. I I I I I I No Scale GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 1 inch = 60 feet REVISIONS EXISTING TREE ROMANELLI &HUGHES 148 WEST SGHROGK ROAD W ESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK A T TARTAN RIDGE TREE SURVEY & REMOVAL PLAN OR TREE MASS Date SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 Job No. 20190043 NOTES: DESCRIPTION 20/23/29 1. INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION IS REQUIRED. 01/21/20 REVISED PERSTAFFCOCOMMENTS CALL (614) 410-4600. RFwSFO PFRSTAFF COMMENTS % 2. THE CITY IS TO BE CONTACTED IF FENCE LOCATION NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED OR PRIOR 0 0 TO ANY ENCROACHMENT OF PRESERVATION emht.com AREA. O � N 0I Q U J a U U w l U Z WOOD CRZ OR F=z U O RAILS 15' RADIUS U , 5 WHICHEVER HIGH VISIBILITY MEDIUM WEIGHT BARRIER 4X4 WOOD POST r (OPTIONAL) QUARE IS GREATER FENCING ATTACH TO POST WITH ZIP TIES AT 1' O.C. EXISTING v GRADE OMME N STEEL FENCE STAKE AT 6' O.C. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED Tree Preservation Detail No Scale GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 1 inch = 60 feet PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE REVISIONS momm Inc. Evaneers - Surveyors wart, rs - Planners •Planners •scientists Scientists Engineers • b n Road, 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, ON 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 ROMANELLI &HUGHES 148 WEST SGHROGK ROAD W ESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK A T TARTAN RIDGE TREE SURVEY & REMOVAL PLAN LOCATED IN: VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME Date SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 Job No. 20190043 DATE DESCRIPTION 20/23/29 PoN RFwseDPFRSTAFFconnnnFNu 01/21/20 REVISED PERSTAFFCOCOMMENTS 01/21/20 RFwSFO PFRSTAFF COMMENTS sale I"=60' sheet 6/7 emht.com PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE Number Latin name Common name DBH Condition 1 UI mus americana American Elm 9 Good 2 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 7 Good 69 ncYlvaRi Groan As 14 -7� peeF 4 Cravi ni is nennsykAA nirA Green Ac 4 -7�r- Good 5 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 Good 6 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 8 Fair 7 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 10 Good 8 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 9 Good 9 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 16 Good 10 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 12 Good 11 nennsykAA ni rA Green Ac 4 8-3 F -a -I' 12 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 16 Good 13 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine 8 Good 14 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 Good 15 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 6 Good 16 Morus rubrua Red Mulberry 918 Good 17 Malus ioensis Crab Apple 12 Fair 19 Ca rya g4 r hr� Pignut Hi r=kery �2- P=r - �r C a rya g4 r hr� Pignut Hi r=kery 1 'I 00th � 1 , �r- 20 Craviniis nennsvlvaR*G a Green Ach �7- l l �d 21 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 14 Good 22 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 14,13 Good 23 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 8 Good 24 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 19 Fair 25 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 14 Good 26 Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 13, 13, 11 Good 27 Catalpa speciosa Northern Cata I pa 7 Good 28 Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 6 Good 29 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 12 Good 30 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 49 Fair 31 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 6 Good 32 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 12 Good 33 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 7 Fair 34 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 16 Good 35 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 15 Good 36 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 24 Good 3-7 Quercus pal u s tr i s Pon Q;l k 347 rear - 38 Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 16 Fair 39 Pinus resinosa Red Pine 8 Fair 40 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 7 Fair 41 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 4-2- 12imus is ctrphi -s 1A r e�Di R I -G PeeF 43 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Fair 44 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Fair 45 Pinus strobus White Pine 12 Fair 46 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 47 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Fair 48 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 49 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Fair 50 Quercus alba White Oak 14 Good 51 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Fair 52 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Fair 53 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 54 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 10 Good 55 Juglans nigra Black Walnut 11 Good 56 Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 10 Good 57 UI mus americana American Elm 14 Good 58 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 14 Good 59 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Fair 60 Quercus alba White Oak 12 Good 61 Pinus strobus White Pine 12 Fair 62 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Good 63 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 6,6,5,5,4 Fair 64 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Good 65 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Fair REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION 10/23/19 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS 11/21/19 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS 01/21/20 REVISED PER STAFF COMMENTS Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emht.com ROMANELLI & HUGHES 148 WEST SCHROCK ROAD WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43081 66 Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 16113 Fair 67 Pinus strobus White Pine 6 Fair 68 Quercus alba White Oak 20 Good 69 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 70 Quercus alba White Oak 9 Good 71 Pinus strobus White Pine 16 Good 72 Pinus strobus White Pine 12 Good 73 Picea abi es Norway Spruce 11 Fair -74 juglans nirrr-+ RIare- L In -- t 14 PeeF 75 Pinus strobus White Pine 12 Good 76 Pinus strobus White Pine 12 Good 77 Ulmus americana American Elm 6 Fair 78 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Fair 7-9 pinus strr4hi-c1A�y/�hir etc 14 80 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 814 Good 94 Drygni-c ceretina RIarlr C -herrn -912ppr- 92- Dini-c ctrnhi-c 1A./hTii e P n 14 d 93 Dctrnc 1A./hTii e�sr 9 D A;4 d 94 Dc ctrec 1A�r etc ra 12nmK �r 4-a)comus nenncvl9ARir-1 Green Ach � -F� 86 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Fair 87 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Fair 88 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 99 4-4viR6lS nenncvlyaRiGa Green Ach 9 go4—aximus nenncvlvanira Green Ach ra GAnd 94 4—aximus nenncvlvanira Green A6 ra F44 92 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 93 4-AviRUS nenncvlVaRiGa Green Ach 9 PeeF 94 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Fair 95 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 96 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 8 Fair 97 Pinus strobus White Pine 15 Good 98 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good -94 Arer nem inrle Be T ra Qp;4 d 100 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Good 101 Pyrus communis Common pear 19 Good 102 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Fair 103 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Good 104 Pinus strobus White Pine 6 Fair 105 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 106 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 107 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 108 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Good 109 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Good 110 Pinus strobus White Pine 10 Good 111 Pinus strobus White Pine 9 Good 112 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 113 Pinus strobus White Pine 13 Good 114 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 8 Good 115 Pinus strobus White Pine 11 Good 116 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 117 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 118 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 119 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 120 Pinus strobus White Pine 8 Good 121 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 7 Good 122 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 7 Good 123 Pinus strobus White Pine 7 Good 124 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 8 Fair 125 Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 18 Fair 126 Picea abi es Norway Spruce 12 Good 127 Picea abi es Norway Spruce 17 Good 4-2-9 Prunus nencvlya Di n C'htar- p PppI' CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE TREE SURVEY LIST TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED >_24" (LANDMARK) 73" DBH (2 TREES) / 3.0" (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 25 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) EXISTING GOOD AND FAIR TREES REMOVED 6" TO <24" (PROTECTED) 545" DBH (51 TREES) / 3.0 (DIA. TREES REPLACED AT INCH FOR INCH) = 182 REPLACEMENT TREES (AT 3.0 CAL.) TOTAL REPLACEMENT TREES = 207 TREES (AT 3.0" CAL.) TREES TO BE REMOVED TREES 3, 4, 11, 20, 85, 89-91 AND 93 ARE ASH TREES AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS TREES 18, 19, 37, 42, 74, 79, 81-84, 93,99 AND 128 ARE IN POOR CONDITION AND ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARDS THE TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS Date LOCATED IN: I SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 2991 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, CITY OF DUBLIN, TOWNSHIP OF JEROME Scale Job No. 20190043 Sheet 7/7 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OVERLOOK AT TARTAN RIDGE :j . SITE Chn of Dublin OHIO. OSA Planning 12019 Case # PLANNING APPLICATION This is the general application farm for all City of Dublin Boards and Commissions. In addition, applicants should submit a checklist with the requirements for the application type indicated below. Attach additional sheers as necessary. ❑ Administrative Appeal ❑ Administrative Departure ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (PUD) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan - Sign (PUD) ❑ Architectural Review Board ❑ Building Code Appeal ❑ Community Plan Amendment ❑ Concept Plan (BSD or PUD) ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Development Plan Review (LVID) ❑ Demolition ❑ Final Development Plan (BSD or PUD) ❑ Final Plat ❑ Informal Review ❑ Master Sign Plan ❑ Minor Project Cl Minor Subdivision ❑ Non -Use (Area) Variance ❑ Preliminary Development Plan (BSD) X Preliminary Plat ❑ Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan (PUD) ❑ Site Plan Review (WID) ❑ Special Permit ❑ Standard District Rezoning ❑ Use Variance ❑ Waiver Review ❑ Wireless Communications Facility ❑ Zoning Code Amendment Property Address(es): McKitrick and Jerome Road Tax ID/Parcel Numter(s) Parcel Size(s) in Acres (List Alp: 3900140580020; (List Each Separately): 3900140580000; 40000140580020; 13.77; 5.21; 2.64; 2.93 40000140581010 Existing Land Use/Development: Existing Zoning District: Mixed Residential Low Density & Mixed Use Tartan Ridge PUD Neighborhood Center Proposed Land Use/Development- Proposed Zoning District Mixed Residential Low Tartan Ridge PUD Density Name (Individual or Organization): DVC 6700 Associates, LLC & The Shoppers at Tartan Mailing Address (Street, City, state, ZIP): The Shoppes at Tartan Ridge 6689 Dublin Center Drive Dublin Ohio 43017 Email/Phone Number: kevin®stavroff.com 614-764-9981 nor questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.410.4600 1 www oublinoumuSA.gov IV. APPLICANT(S): Complete this section ifthe person/organization representing the applicant/ property owner is differert from the applicant. Not Applicable Name (Individual or Organization): Gary Smith / G2 Planning & Design Mailing Address (Street nty, State, ZIP): 720 E Broad Street, Suite 200 Columbus Ohio 43215 Phone Number: 614-390-6149 Enni gsmith6g2planning.com ❑ Not Applicable ligpIll Phone Number: VI. PROPERTY OWNER'S AUTHO listed In Section III must authorize the A: Owner's behalf with respect to this applic Gary Smith / G2 Planning & Design 720 E Broad Street, Suite 200 Columbus Ohio 43215 614-390-6149 gemith@g2planning.com I Kevin McCauley, Authorized Agent , the property owner, hereby authorize Gary Smith/G2 Planning & Design To ad as my representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modification to the application. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative (hated in Sections III and/or IV), Original Signature of Property Owner (listed In Section 11): ll I Date: 8/21119 1 Subud a d swam before me thi da of 20 L •` - `�`•"" �' " ` state of�a y NOTARY PUBLIC Couniy of �. Notary Public --.,.s,.y. • i FOR THE -— STATE OF OHIO 3'` ' i�`' p; My Comri Expires .t, ovl VIL AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: application. The Property Owner/ Applicant/ Authorized Representative (listed in Section 11), hereby initializes City representatives to enter, photograph, and post a notice on the property described in this application. This is orshoscal, but strongly recomripinded. I Kevin McCauley, Authorized Agent , the property owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to enter, photograph and post a notice on the property described In the application. Original signature of Property Owner or Authoni Representative: Date: 8/21/19 For questions or more Information, please contact Planning at 614.410.4600 1 www.duNirohioUSA.gov VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This section must b^_ completed with an original signature and noYarizetl. Original Document Attached I Kevin McCauley Authorized Agent , the property owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and cored to best of my knowledge and belief. Original Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative: Subscn d T before me this 1 ` State of O Countyof r k(\ Notary FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: FORTHE STATE OF QHIO My Commission Expires November26,2021 Case Title: Case Number: Date Received: Amount Received: Next Decision Due Date (if Applicable): Receipt Number: Reviewing Badly (Ci¢le One): ART ARB BZA CC PZC Final Date of Determination: Map Zone: Determination or Action: Related Cases: Ordinance Number (If Applicable): For questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.410,1600 1 wwwAublinohioUSA.gov BRD OF EDUCATION DUBLIN CITY CITY OF DUBLIN BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS 7030 COFFMAN RD 5200 EMERALD PKWY 1069 W MAIN ST DUBLIN, OH 43017-1068 DUBLIN, OH 43017-1068 WESTERVILLE, OH 43081-1181 OBRIEN LINDA L SHOPPES AT TARTAN RIDGE LLC PUN, TALENT VARLUE PHO, 9635 HYLAND CROY ROAD 6689 DUBLIN CENTER DRIVE MING HONG 6786 BARONET BLVD PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 WILLIAMS, NANCY GILLISPIE, GERARD MOORE, JALA LOUISE AND 6794 BARONET BLVD 6802 BARONET BLVD ADRIAN CARL 6810 BARONET BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 GEOFFRION, ALICE LUTZ, KEVIN W AND RESTREPO, MAURICIO 9171 BRENHAM WAY JENNIFER M 9187 BRENHAM WAY 9179 BRENHAM WAY DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 FORTE, VICTOR RAM, MURLI AND JAYASHREE CHANDRA, PURNAMA 9195 BRENHAM WAY MURLIDAR 9211 BRENHAM WAY 9203 BRENHAM WAY DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 PETERSON, CHRISTOPHER C BREITMAYER, GEORGE PAYNTER, JENNI LYNN AND 7165 EMMET ROW LN 7180 EMMET ROW LN TREVOR 7172 EMMET ROW LN DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43016 City of RECORD OF ACTION Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday® December � 17 2019 16:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: S. The Overlook at Tartan Ridge McKitrick and Jerome Road 19-OSSPP Preliminary Plat Proposal: Subdivide ±24.55 acres in the Tartan Ridge neighborhood into 56 single- family lots, rights-of-way for five public streets, and two open space reserves. Location: northeast of the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat under the provisions of Zoning Code Sections 153.050-153.056. Applicant: Gary Smith, G2 Planning & Design Planning Contact: Chase J. Ridge, AICD Candidate, Planner I Contact Information: 614.410.4656, cridge@dublin.oh.us Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/19-085 M®TIN., Ms. Call moved, Ms. Kennedy seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat with four conditions: 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments and updates to the plat in accordance with the accompanying Preliminary Development Plan are made prior to City Council submittal; 2) That the applicant continue to work with Staff to ensure that the street names are approved and indicated appropriately on the plat; and 3) That the applicant revise the Preliminary Plat prior to Council review to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, as required by Code; and 4) That the applicant revise the plat to accurately display the planned 100 -foot right—of-way for Hyland Croy Road. W L° ESUL'T. The Preliminary Plat was recommended to City Council for approval. � CORDED VQ e'�=U: Victoria Newell Yes Jane Fox Yes Warren Fishman Yes CEGtS(BGRcayg©Gi ) Kristina Kennedy Yes William Wilson Absent1 l l id)l Mark Supelak Yes - Rebecca Call Yes Chase J. Ridge, AICP Ca didate, Pla ner I IP LArMr1RR11G 5800 Shier Rinns RnAd Dublin, shin 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 17 of 32 Ms. Newell stated that Cases 4 and 5 would be heard together. 4. The Overlook at Tartan Ridge, McKitrick and Jerome Road, 19-094, Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan 5. The Overlook at Tartan Ridge, McKitrick and Jerome Road, 19-085 Preliminary Plat Ms. Newell stated that Case 4 is a request for a recommendation of approval to City Council for a rezoning with preliminary development plan of approximately 24 acres for the future construction of up to 56 single-family homes and approximately 7.9 acres of open space. The site is within the Tartan Ridge Planned Unit Development District, northeast of the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road. Case 5 is for the same site and the request is for a recommendation of approval to City Council for preliminary plat to subdivide the site. The Commission will hear the cases together. Staff Presentation Mr. Ridge stated that the site is currently zoned PUD, Tartan Ridge, and contains all or portions of Subareas Dl, E and F, which permit a mix of uses including townhomes and commercial uses. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road and is currently undeveloped. There is an existing stormwater pond in the northwest portion of the site and a solitary tree stand in the southwest portion of the site. The proposed plan for approximately 24 acres includes 56 lots with an average density of 2.33 dwelling units per acre and eight acres of open space. Lot sizes are proposed in two different sizes. There are 34 patio lots that are a minimum of 52 feet wide at the building line with a minimum lot depth of 125 feet. The remaining 22 courtyard lots are located on the perimeter of the site and are a minimum of 60 feet wide at the building line and a minimum of 125 feet deep. Lots range in size from 6,500 square feet to 10,800 square feet. Lot coverage is limited to 60 percent, including structure and driveway. Sideyard setbacks are a consistent six feet minimum across the site. Rear yard setbacks are 25 feet throughout site. Front yard setbacks are a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the right-of-way, or as otherwise shown on the preliminary plat. For patio homes, the front yard setbacks are also a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet. Front -loaded garages must be located at the maximum setback of 25 feet while non -garage portions of the front fagade may be permitted to extend up to the minimum 15 -foot setback. The rear yard setback for both lot types is 25 feet from the rear property line. The minimum required side yard setback is 6 feet. The development text also requires that a minimum of 22 lots in the development have court - oriented garages. On the southeast corner of the site is Lot 1. Due to the separation/isolation and odd lot shape, staff is recommending that the applicant remove Lot 1 from the plan. The applicant has put an emphasis on walkability throughout the site with sidewalks along all frontages, as well as connection and expansion to the shared -use paths along McKitrick and Hyland -Croy Roads. An existing connection to the school site to the north is to remain. There is significant landscaping around the perimeter of the site. The applicant is proposing mounding at a height of 3 - 5 feet with trees on top and behind in a naturalized manner. The proposed pond amenity will be a part Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 18 of 32 of the existing stormwater management pond in the northwest portion of the site. The amenity will include a patio space and shelter structure with seating. The development text requires that a hedgerow be planted and run parallel to the front property line as seen elsewhere in Tartan Ridge. It also requires gates and gatepost if a sidewalk is to connect from the front door to the public sidewalk. Brick, stone, or wood posts are permitted materials for the gateposts. Per the development text, driveways are to be constructed of brick pavers, which is a character element unique to this subarea. Outdoor spaces can be constructed within the footprint of the home. Open spaces such as at -grade patios will also be permitted to encroach 10 feet into the rear yard setback, providing increased outdoor amenity space, if desired by the homeowner. Per the development text, the HOA will be responsible for maintaining all open spaces as well as the hedgerow in front of the homes. An important architectural element will be carried over from Tartan Ridge into this subarea, which is the consistent use of cladding materials across all fagades. The City -owned pond will be re -designed slightly. Staff is recommending the subarea map include the existing stormwater management pond in the southeast portion of the site that is to be redesigned with this proposal. It is also requested that the applicant continue to work with staff to ensure the street names and naming method is appropriate and that the applicant revise the plat to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy and McKitrick Roads. The rezoning and preliminary development plan have been reviewed against all applicable criteria, and staff recommends approval with three conditions. The plat has also been reviewed against all applicable criteria and staff recommends approval with four conditions. Commission Questions Ms. Call inquired what is the reason for recommending deletion of Lot 1. Mr. Ridge responded that Lot 1 is separated from the rest of the community by a sewer easement The lot is irregularly shaped, larger than the other lots and isolated. Ms. Call inquired if the easement is a no -build zone. Mr. Ridge responded affirmatively. Mr. Fishman stated that he would assume that the area where the pond is located would be unbuildable, so it would become part of the common area. Mr. Ridge confirmed that would be the case. Ms. Fox stated that there is a lovely area on the northwest side with the pond area. The City has many retention ponds. There is opportunity to utilize them as an amenity for developments, and this is a good-sized development. If Lot 1 is eliminated, has staff suggested that a nicer amenity be created at this end of the development, as well? Mr. Ridge responded that staff has not made that request. Ms. Fox inquired how stubbing off the one street, currently unnamed, would impact ability for emergency vehicles and trucks to turn around. Mr. Ridge responded that the proposed name of the street is Jasmine Glen Drive. Ms. Kennedy inquired between which lot numbers the proposed street would be located. Ms. Fox responded that the street lies between Lot 32 and 30. She is curious about why that street has been stubbed. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 19 of 32 Mr. Ridge responded that some neighbors across the street were concerned about the glare of vehicle headlights into their homes and the closeness of that intersection to the one at Baronet Boulevard. Ms. Fox inquired if all were public streets. Mr. Ridge responded affirmatively Ms. Fox requested confirmation that truck turnaround would not be an issue there. Mr. Ridge responded affirmatively. Ms. Newell inquired how a fire vehicle would turn around, if the street terminates there. Staff responded that it would be necessary for the vehicle to back up. Ms. Newell stated that there is no ability for a fire vehicle to turn around. Once the roundabout is constructed, is there a distance requirement between that and another lane that would stop and turn? Staff responded that there is no such requirement. Ms. Fox asked about the City policy on adding a left turn lane. Mr. Hammersmith responded that it has been the City's practice for many years that with any new access point into a subdivision, a left turn lane be required to preserve the through movements on the roadway and provide safe access/egress from the development. Ms. Fox inquired if construction of that turn lane is the responsibility of the developer when constructing the development. Mr. Hammersmith responded affirmatively. It is built as a public improvement consistent with the City's standards, which the City then inspects and accepts. Ms. Fox inquired if there have been any exceptions to that practice. Mr. Hammersmith responded that there has been none during his tenure with the City. Ms. Kennedy inquired if the left turn is near Lot 1. Mr. Hammersmith responded affirmatively; it is the McKitrick Road access point, the eastbound left -turn lane. Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Land and Development, 6689 Dublin Center Drive, Dublin, representative for Tartan Ridge LLC, stated that with him tonight are Gary Smith, G2 Planning & Design, Jim Ohlin, Romanelli & Hughes and Steve Shell, EMH&T Engineering. Previously, they presented the Concept Plan for this development to the Commission. Stavroff has been involved with this project since its inception. They made the initial land purchase for what is now Tartan Ridge. In 2007, they believed there would be a commercial element in this development. In 2019, retail is not an option, and the majority of the residents have indicated they are not supportive of retail within the development. They would prefer to have the subdivision completed now rather than wait five to fifteen years for potential retail to occur. The current market overwhelmingly indicates that a detached, empty -nester product within a community such as this is desired. Dublin residents wanting to downsize will be able to remain within Dublin, be part of the Tartan Ridge community and have a maintenance -free lifestyle. He believes Tartan Ridge is one the best developments he has ever been involved with, and these high-end homes, built by Romanelli & Hughes, will continue that quality. The Commission's concerns shared at the Concept Plan review were noted and have been addressed; Mr. Smith will elaborate on those. As required by City Engineering, a left -turn lane into McKitrick Road will be constructed. However, there is an established New Community Authority, which must pay for the turn lane. Although the developer would build the turn lane and receive a 5% return on his investment, the residents of Tartan Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 20 of 32 Ridge pay into that Community Autlhority. The residents paid for the other existing three intersections. No one is opposed to the turn lane, but the residents do not want to pay for it. However, the turn lane is not part of the rezoning matter before the Commission at this time. It could be a later matter for staff's or Council's consideration. Mr. Hammersmith stated that when he responded to the Commission's earlier question regarding the left -turn lane into this development, he responded in general terms. This turn lane and the other turn lanes constructed earlier with this development were part of an infrastructure agreement approved by City Council in 2008, and only a City Council action could modify that agreement. Gary Smith, G2 Planning and Design, 720 E. Broad Street, Columbus, stated that since July, they have been working on the architectural elements of the development, tweaking the plan and making significant changes to the development text. The Romanelli & Hughes product has been modified to meet the needs of this development. This is a 24 -acre portion of the existing Tartan Ridge development and this portion is in the southwest, below Glacier Ridge Elementary School. What is currently approved for that area are five single-family homes, 24 townhomes, and 68,000 square feet of retail and commercial uses, potentially including gas stations, convenience stores, restaurants and associated uses. The developer has been working on the retail piece of the development for the past 12 years, but no viable option was identified. Because there was a strong desire to have the community completed, they looked for other options. Some form of lower -density residential was determined to be the best use. The City is fortunate to have an abundance of single-family product, and has been trying to broaden the spectrum of lifestyle options for its residents, such as the Bridge Park product. What is proposed is a continuation of that effort to address another lifestyle need. There is a niche of Dublin homeowners who no longer need a large, single-family home. However, they value their network of friends in Dublin and prefer not to move away. They continue to want a high-end home, but with limited maintenance requirements. They may prefer to travel a good portion of the year without the demands of caring for a home here. The proposed development will attract those types of buyers. They are requesting approval of 56 high quality, empty -nester patio homes. Because 29 single- family homes are already approved here, essentially, they are requesting to exchange another 27 patio homes for the 68,000 square feet of retail previously planned. The site is long, linear and encumbered by heavy setbacks along Hyland -Croy and McKitrick Roads. There is an existing pond in the northwest corner of the site, which will be used for stormwater retention. The site dictates the layout of the development. Early in the process, neighbors across the street on Brenham Way indicated that they were not excited about having lots fronting the street across from their homes and asked them to consider turning the layout to avoid that situation. Therefore, the long, linear site, pond and need to avoid having homes fronting the road across from Brenham Way have dictated the layout. In July, the Commission discussed the gridded layout of the development. While it may appear so in a Google view, he has often viewed similar developments and found that a ground -level experience of the site feels different. Upon entering the community, a spectacular model home will be seen. There was some discussion about eliminating Lot 1, but for them, Lot 1 is extremely important. The home on that lot will be the nicest home in the development and will be a critical sales tool. Although the home will be a little further apart due to the easement, many other elements will tie the home to the development, such as the landscaping, hedge treatment and the columns. Upon driving further into the community, the site will look much as it does today. On the right side will be the existing park and the homes on Brenham Way; on the left side will be a linear greenspace. Mounding and landscaping will be Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 21 of 32 incorporated into that space. The same Tartan Ridge hedge will follow all the sidewalks. In a number of locations, benches will be provided, giving residents the opportunity to sit. There will be no long streets or blocks in this community. Although there is a grid pattern, due to the very short grids, drives and turns, the focus will be on the architecture. On 17 homes, additional architecture treatment on the sides will be required due to those sides being more exposed to the view. The lots along the perimeter have been widened and changed to courtyard lots, and a variance in setbacks will provide architecture that peaks in and out of the view, creating more interest. The courtyards will provide intimate spaces framed by the architecture. This will be complemented by other elements that are part of the Tartan Ridge experience, including an architectural style consistent with the existing development; hedge treatment along all the roads; and masonry columns adjacent to each driveway. With 56 driveways, there will be 112 masonry columns, costing a total of $250,000. There will be a significant investment on the landscape treatment on the street frontages. Every home will have a brick driveway and matching brick private sidewalks, which is an element not required for the existing Tartan Ridge development. The pond amenity will now be more central to the units than in the earlier plan. With a fireplace and covered seating area, it will be a place for the residents to enjoy. Along the perimeter will be a lush landscape buffer and extensive mounding along Hyland -Croy and McKitrick Roads. Not only will it buffer the rear of the homes, it also will make the drive along those roads feel pastoral. This development will replace a proposed use that would not be viable and is unpopular with many of the Tartan Ridge residents with a use that is in high demand and will serve the needs of the aging portion of Dublin's population. In addition, this development will result in a considerable reduction in the amount of traffic anticipated for the area. Patio homes typically generate less trips per day than other residential development, and its traffic will not be at peak times. These high-value homes will have high property taxes but make little impact on the schools. Due to its many attributes, this is probably the best housing development possible for this area. Ms. Fox stated that it appears they have discussed the proposed housing development with the neighbors and attempted to address any concerns. Mr. McCauley responded that there are two different HOAs. They have met with some of those board members to receive their input, and a survey was sent out to residents earlier to obtain feedback. Ms. Call inquired how the variances in home alignments would impact the front setbacks of the homes, including the garages and the sidewalks. Mr. Smith responded that the garage doors do not face the sidewalk. The minimum setback for the garages is 15 feet from the right-of-way where the sidewalk is located; the maximum distance is 25 feet. The varied depth in homes will create interest on the street. Ms. Kennedy inquired if the existing pedestrian trails to Glacier Ridge Elementary Schools would also connect to this community. Mr. Ridge responded affirmatively. Mr. Fishman inquired if the smaller pond would remain wet year round. Mr. McCauley responded that it would be a dry basin. Although it will provide a potential overflow area, it would rarely have water. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 22 of 32 Steve Shell, EMH&T, 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH, stated that they were taking advantage of an open area for potential overflow storage, to provide flexibility for the City pond to the west. The proposed basin may not remain. Mr. Fishman stated that for aesthetic reasons, the City typically prefers a wet pond, which can fulfill the same purpose. Mr. Smith stated that because it is a tight area, there is a concern about having a wet pond there, which would be connected to the larger pond on the west side. They would work with City Engineering on that function. Mr. Shell stated that this would be a "bubble up" system. In higher storm events, upper storage basins are used. They would only be wet with a 50 -year event or above, so water would rarely be seen in that area. Mr. Smith stated that stormwater that would typically flow under the surface could bubble up out of it here during a greater event storm. They would consider the potential opportunity for making it a wet basin as well as landscaping opportunities, should it remain dry. Mr. McCauley stated that it would be very difficult to make this a wet pond. It would be necessary to make the pond even larger to do so. Ms. Newell stated that if the house on Lot 1 were eliminated, which is staffs recommendation, more area would be available. Mr. McCauley stated that the wet pond would be unnecessary, as there would seldom be a storm event to make it wet. Because it is a high spot, it would be difficult to make it wet all the time for aesthetic purposes only. Ms. Husak stated that the City discourages wet ponds within proximity to a road; a 50 -ft. setback from the right-of-way is typically required. Mr. Fishman noted that the dry basins he has seen around the City usually are full of weeds and overgrowth. There would need to be a commitment from the developer that a dry basin would be well landscaped and maintained. Mr. Smith responded that they are able to make that commitment. This will be a well maintained community. The residents will have a high level of expectations. They will work with staff to ensure what is planted will be maintained and look attractive. Ms. Kennedy inquired about the price point of these homes. Mr. Smith responded that the home prices would be approximately $600,000-$650,000. Mr. Fishman stated that he likes the development, except for Lot 1. He believes eliminating that lot would improve the greenspace view from the street. Mr. Smith responded that while he understands his point, having a model home located on that lot is a critical marketing piece for them. It also would provide a terminus for the architecture of the greater development, rather than having it bleed out to nowhere. This home will be a centerpiece, a showpiece for the community. Mr. Fishman stated that the neighbors would prefer to see open space. Many subdivisions do not have that, but Tartan Fields does. Its open space is a "Wow"factor. He would concur with staff's recommendation to eliminate that lot. Ms. Call stated that every parcel presents its own unique features. The setbacks along McKitrick Road here are very nice, and the open space being provided with this development already Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 23 of 32 exceeds the amount required, which is 3.56 acres. The actual space provided is 7.9 acres. Lot 1 would be in addition to that. Ms. Kennedy inquired if information regarding proposed developments such as this are shared with the School District, so that it can be factored into its redistricting considerations. Ms. Husak responded that she is unsure if the Schools are aware of the proposed development. However, an empty nester product would not have much impact on their redistricting considerations. Mr. Boggs stated that Dublin Schools redistricting is based on projections of development, not this specific development, but upon expected residential infill within the District's footprint. Ms. Call stated that the Schools are aware of the proposed developments that are before the Commission. This type of development, however, would have little impact. Ms. Fox stated that she likes the mounding and landscaping along the road. It will create a nice entrance along Hyland -Croy and McKitrick Roads. She likes the enhancements to the pond amenity and public gathering area. The mounding appears to stop behind Lot 17, and the topography around the pond is not extreme. Is there a way to provide connectivity from inside the development out to Hyland -Croy Road, perhaps with a path? The Community Plan recommends providing connectivity from one neighborhood to another. Due to the nearby school, a path connection to Hyland -Croy would be beneficial. Mr. Smith responded that connectivity has been discussed. The concern is that this is an empty nester community. They do not want to encourage pedestrian traffic into the community from the street. They would be willing to explore connectivity from another location, but not directly from the street. They do not want to advertise a path through the community to be used by bikers or pedestrian traffic along Hyland -Croy. Ms. Fox stated that she understands. However, residents of the community would appreciate a connectivity to the existing bikepath. Perhaps it could be provided on another corner. Mr. McCauley stated that throughout Tartan Ridge, there are many other connection points. Residents of this community would have to go outside the community to access one of those paths, but they are confident the residents would prefer that to the alternative. Today, we are constructing pedestrian bridges to encourage our community to walk; perhaps it is fine to encourage the residents of the community to walk down to the street to a central point to access the 1,000 -acre park across the street. To have people cutting through this neighborhood would not have a desirable impact. Ms. Fox stated there are many pedestrian and bike paths around the proposed development, so that opportunity exists. Many of her friends have moved to communities designed for ages 55 and older. What they enjoy is a community center where they can gather. Was there any consideration for using Lot 1 for that purpose? Mr. Smith stated that Lot 1 was originally used for a community gathering spot, using the fireplace feature. However, Romanelli & Hughes has not experienced interest from potential homebuyers for having a community center, especially in a community this small. It is expensive to support the needed level of architecture, maintenance, heating and cooling needs by HOA dues from 56 lots. Financially, it would be more possible for a community of 150 patio homes to support a fitness center. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 24 of 32 Ms. Fox stated she believes an attractive architectural feature would provide a nice introduction to the community. Perhaps an open -sided feature without a high level of maintenance would be an option to consider. Mr. Smith clarified that the ultimate purpose of Lot 1 for Romanelli & Hughes is to have a model home to be used as a sales center for the development. A model home will showcase what they are selling in the community, but its ultimate repurpose is a home. Mr. McCauley stated that they have been working on developing this area for 12 years and one year on this specific plan. A model home on Lot 1 will be their sales location, and the home will be the highlight of the community. After 12 years of effort, eliminating that critical feature is too great a risk to take. When everything is completed and the hedgerows are present, this piece will be well integrated into a beautiful development. Taking this one off the board is a significant ask for the Commission to make of the developer. That home is extremely important to kick off this community. Gathering places for the community have been incorporated elsewhere in the development. Jim Ohlin, Romanelli & Hughes, 148 W. Schrock Road, Westerville Ohio 43081, stated that Lot 1 is the gateway to and the signature piece for the community. Opportunities like this to have a model that will stand out are very important to them. It will be a showcase at the entrance versus just another open greenspace. In considering providing amenities, they always consider the burden that would be placed on the HOA. They are providing multiple amenities within this community. These homeowners will expect a high level of detail for their mounds, greenspace, mulch beds, trees and shrubs — and all that comes with a price. From the HOA's perspective, the pond overlook, in particular, will require costly maintenance. To include an additional clubhouse feature for 56 patio homes would be very burdensome to the homeowners. They have spent a lot of time discussing this layout internally. Former Planning Director Mr. Papsidero has been integral to that planning effort. Ms. Newell stated that she agrees with staffs condition. She understands that Llot 1 is the premier property for marketing purposes. However, Lot 2 could serve that purpose just as well. Eliminating Lot 1 would improve the entry into the community. Mr. Fishman concurred. In regard to Ms. Fox's suggestion, he does not believe another amenity should be placed on Lot 1. Greenspace alone will provide a nice entrance. Lot 2 can be used to provide a spectacular model home. Overall, he believes the development plan is beautiful. Public Comment David Lakin, 7128 Glacier Ridge Boulevard, Dublin, OH, stated that he formerly served on the Tartan Ridge HOA. He is hopeful that all of the construction traffic will come in from McKitrick Road and not through the main portion of the neighborhood. He is concerned about the school crossing for Glacier Ridge Elementary. When they refer to the HOA, are they referring to a new HOA or the master HOA? Ms. Husak responded that this development will have a new HOA. Mr. Lakin inquired if the residents of this new development also would pay into the master HOA. Current residents pay $800/year to maintain the hedgerows and the City's open spaces. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 25 of 32 Ms. Husak responded that, as proposed, they would not. Mr. Lakin stated that on page 32 of the existing development text, the statement is made that all residential property owners located within Tartan Ridge PUD shall be required to join and maintain membership in a forced and funded homeowners association. Why would these homes not be included, as well? This is important because the master HOA maintains many acres of City land within Tartan Ridge. They were told that due to the proximity they all have to the land, all should share the burden of the maintenance cost. It directly affects the residents' property values and quality of life. These new homes will share that same neighborhood. It would appear that all the residents in the existing development will be sharing in the cost of the left turn lane into the new development, but the new homeowners will not be sharing in the maintenance cost of the common areas. It would make sense for all the common area to be included in the master HOA, and all residential homeowners should pay equally into the master HOA. Ms. Husak stated that there are two HOAs for the area to the north. There is also an HOA for the alley -loaded lots. Because they also pay into the master HOA, they pay more than $800/year. Mr. McCauley stated that, as envisioned, the new development would have its own HOA and be responsible for its 7.5 acres of open space and right-of-way, and not be part of the Tartan Ridge master HOA. This new development will have a high level of maintenance costs in addition to its open space, including the pond and pond amenity, the brick driveways and the sidewalks, and the lawns and landscaping needs for the individual homes. This is a conversation that he and Mr. Ohlin could have with the Tartan Ridge HOA board to see how they would like to proceed. He is unsure the master HOA would want to take on what will be a heavy burden for these additional 56 lots. It would require more than $800/year per home to cover those costs. Mr. Lakin stated that there are two other subareas within the subdivision that pay into their own HOAs for private roads and specific maintenance within those subareas, in addition to paying in the master HOA. The maintenance for all the common land, including that which abuts the villa homes is paid by the master HOA. Although they do not own the land, they are responsible for the maintenance. If the City of Dublin would be willing to assume some of the responsibility for maintenance of their own land, that could be an option. Is there any opportunity for the Hyland - Croy roundabout capital project to be scheduled to coincide with the construction of the turn lane? Ms. Newell responded that issue is not part of the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Lakin stated that the varieties of the hedge materials in Tartan Ridge were determined by the City. They have accumulated information on which hedge varieties have lived and which have not. They would like to share that information with staff at the appropriate time. The HOA has been burdened with replacing hedges every year, because they are not the correct variety. They now have historical information on what has proven to be successful within their neighborhood. Ms. Kennedy referred to Mr. Lakin's earlier comment about second HOAs that can handle the specific maintenance needs of their areas. Would it be appropriate for the Commission to provide such a recommendation for the proposed development? Mr. Boggs stated that HOA considerations do not address the criteria before the Commission; however, that item could be addressed by City Council. Without knowing details about the status Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 26 of 32 of the master HOA and the details of the proposed declarations and covenants for the new HOA, he cannot provide better guidance. It would be beneficial for the applicant and the master HOA leadership to meet and discuss these issues. Ms. Fox suggested a condition be added that information with those details be provided to City Council for their consideration of this rezoning. The development text does describe the HOA obligation. This new rezoning area is part of an overall much larger development. If the new development is being treated differently than the existing development, that is an issue Council would want to be made aware of. Mr. Boggs responded that Council would want to be made aware of this matter. Including such a condition would be responsive to the criteria that the common areas be maintained appropriately. Typically, Planning staff and the Commission do not address how that occurs other than requiring that there be a forced and funded HOA. How those responsibilities are shared is not part of this Commission's purview. Ms. Fox stated that the reason she suggests Council be made aware of the matter is, in the past, Council has been petitioned by HOAs for relief when HOAs have experienced financial burdens because these specifics were not clearly addressed with the development. It would be preferable to have a good understanding of this issue as it relates to the overall development and ensure that an exception is not made that will create a problem for the master HOA, and ultimately, the City. Mr. Lakin noted that essentially, this would be defunding the master HOA the funds from the 29 homes that originally were planned in Tartan Ridge — funds he assumes were factored into calculation of the HOA fee. Ms. Call stated that the City does not address HOA fund calculations. Looking at the drawing provided, there is a red dotted line circling the development area; what does that denote? Ms. Husak responded that an outline of the entire Tartan Ridge development as it exists today was provided; the hatched area designates the proposed development area. Ms. Call stated that, in her view, if this area is being included in Tartan Ridge, it should be included financially, as well. That may mean that a sub association is needed to address the maintenance of the greater amenities in the proposed development. Although that is outside the purview of this Commission, it needs to be addressed by some party. Perhaps the Commission could direct staff to determine the proper body to address it and ensure that it is communicated to City Council. Mr. Fishman agreed, noting that perhaps these residents should pay into the master HOA and have their own sub association, as well. However, much of this area originally was planned as commercial property. The commercial area was not part of the earlier HOA fee calculation. Mr. Lakin responded that there were two parcels involved. The commercial component was planned on the right edge, and 29 homes are in the remaining area. Mr. McCauley stated that, currently, he is not sufficiently knowledgeable of the master HOA document provisions; however, they would abide by the stated terms. If the documents state that this area is to be included in the overall forced and funded HOA, they will comply. If the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 27 of 32 documents are unclear on the matter, they would discuss the issue with the master HOA leadership. In addition to lawns, this new area also will have 7.5 acres of open space and a pond amenity. The master HOA may not want to maintain that area. Because this area will have a higher degree of maintenance demands, the applicant was willing to handle that financial responsibility in its entirety. The anticipated financial costs would be calculated, and the parties would meet and discuss them. Mr. Lakin stated that the Stavroff group has been excellent to work with, and he has spoken with Mr. McCauley frequently. They like the proposed development plan. In regard to a home on Lot 1 — as a resident in the community, he has no objection to the developer's plan. Kevin Lutz, 9179 Brenham Way, Dublin, stated that his home is located across from the stubbed street. If that street were to cut through, vehicle lights would be an issue for his family; he appreciates the consideration that was made. Although he would prefer the area remain a soybean field, development will inevitably occur. He has heard that they have been trying to identify the right development for 12 years. It is better that it be development that is controlled, and a residential development is much better than the 68,000 square feet of commercial that could have been programmed. That amount of commercial space would not be a coffee shop and ice cream parlor; it would be a strip mall. He applauds the work that has been done with the streets, avoiding any direct access off Hyland -Croy Road that would have resulted in cut -through traffic through their neighborhood. Glacier Ridge Elementary School is their neighbor. Putting any commercial development here would have required a significant level of caution. Having an empty -nester neighborhood makes much more sense. From 3:00-4:00 p.m., Brenham Way is occupied by 20-25 vehicles making school pickups. The proposed development will complement that practice. If a showcase home on Lot 1 will sell all the houses in the division faster, then he supports giving them Lot 1. He would prefer the building process not take eight years! What their neighborhood needs is to be connected. They do not have a bikepath connection. For his children to ride their bikes to Jerome High School, they must either walk their bikes along Hyland - Croy Road or cut through a cornfield. This project will permit a bikepath to be constructed from Glacier Ridge Elementary to Jerome High School, meeting a real need. Although the residents may not want to pay for another left turn lane, that is a better option than the two left -turn lanes that would have occurred with a commercial development. In that case, a left -turn lane off Hyland -Croy Road would have been necessary, as well. There would also be a curbcut on the needed bikepath. Currently, the stretch of road from the elementary school to McKitrick Road has no curbcuts, so children can bike safely down to that intersection. Ms. Kennedy stated she appreciates the great public feedback and their opinions regarding a house on Lot 1. The Commission appreciates hearing the voice of the residents. Max Long, 1057 Hyland Croy Road, Dublin, stated that Jerome Township, Union County and the City of Dublin have worked together on forming a comprehensive plan — The Crossroads Area Plan. In 2015, the City agreed to Jerome Township's and Union County's plan. In the Land Use Plan, it was indicated that a rural area would be maintained throughout Hyland Croy Road. Jerome Village has already built 27 homes; 38 homes are planned; and a total of 5,300 homes are projected. In addition to Glacier Ridge Elementary, another elementary and middle school will be added on the same road. Glacier Ridge Elementary is set back 200 feet. When the Oak Park development was adopted, 230 feet of road frontage was required. For Corazon, 300 feet was required; for the Pulte Homes Autumn Rose development, 215 feet of road frontage was required. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 28 of 32 Does the text for this development require that the ROW be extended from 40 feet to 50 feet from the center of the road? Mr. Ridge responded that is the fourth condition, which was added after the staff report was distributed. Mr. Long stated the road is at the back of the pond. Lots 8 - 17 are within 100 feet of the road. Mid Ohio Regional Planning Commission has indicated that Hyland -Croy will be changed to a four - lane road with an island. When that is completed, will any setback remain? On the Corazon property to the south, the islands are built up, earthen dams with trees, so those homes cannot be seen. According to page 4-2 of this plan, the backs of the homes will not be exposed to the existing road; yet, Lots 8-17 are within 100 feet of the road. The plan also provides for the homes to be architecturally staggered on the lots. With only a 3 to 5 -foot mound, there will be a direct view into the rear patios of these homes. It was understood that new residential development was not to be permitted to encroach upon this area. What will the distance be between the anticipated traffic circle and Lot 8? Mr. Ridge responded that he does not have that information at hand. Mr. Long stated that for comparison purposes, Glacier Ridge Elementary has a 250 -foot setback. The O'Brien property at 9635 Hyland Croy has a 450 -foot setback, and the other properties to the south range from 300 feet to 200 feet. Dublin has preserved that setback in the past. There will also be a path immediately next to the road. He does not want his children walking along this road. He lives on this road, which has a 45 -mph speed limit. It is often difficult to exit their driveway. This is a heavily traveled road, and these houses will be next to the road. The area plans, including the Jerome Township Comprehensive Plan and the Crossroads Area Plan required some setbacks. The Gorden Property in Dublin provides a 50 -ft. setback from the right-of-way; adjacent to that is a service road, and an additional 100 feet is required on the inside before building is permitted. That plan provides a significant open area -- why was nothing similar required for this development? He is concerned this development will destroy the rural feel driving along Hyland -Croy Road. Commission Questions Ms. Newell inquired if the City Code has setback requirements for this area. At one time, certain City roadways were considered scenic, typically with requirements for 200 -foot setbacks. Does the Community Plan address this? Ms. Husak stated that the speaker referred to The Crossroads Plan. Staff has reviewed that plan, discussed the issue with Union County and verified that The Crossroads Plan does not address homes backing up to Hyland -Croy Road. Many of the properties that were mentioned are not within the City's jurisdiction. All properties on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road are in Jerome Township and were developed as very rural lots. The City's Zoning Code does not require a setback greater than the right-of-way width. Some of the neighborhoods, such as Bishop's Crossing, Bishop's Run and Park Place, which are now 10-15 years old, were built when the City was working on a plan called, "The Road to WOW." That plan, which was never adopted, proposed standards for greater setbacks from Hyland -Croy Road, and in exchange, higher density would be permitted. The 2007 Community Plan provided for the roadway characteristics of a scenic, rural roadway with a setback requirement of 200 feet. The Community Plan was updated in 2013, along with the Northwest Glacier Ridge Area Plan, and that revision eliminated some of the roadway characteristics and setbacks. The current setback requirement is 80-100 feet. What is proposed with this plan is 100 feet, so it is consistent with the Community Plan. The Community Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 29 of 32 Plan is a policy document. Mr. Long is referring to Township documents, which the City of Dublin does not have. She is unsure if the Township's 2018 document has the same language, although that document has not been approved. Ms. Newell referred to Exhibit C-1, which is an EMH&T plan. Running along Hyland -Croy Road, there are a number of dashed lines; what do they denote? Mr. Smith stated that there are existing easements along Hyland -Croy Road, including a gas line. He believes the dashed lines designate those lines. Ms. Newell inquired if there are any easements for future roadway improvements. Mr. Smith responded that there are not. However, they will be dedicating 50 feet of right-of-way along Hyland -Croy Road, pre staffs request, which will result in a total of 100 feet. Mr. McCauley stated that the existing zoning, which includes the commercial development, permitted the development to be closer than 200 feet. He believes a setback of 150 feet was permitted. The new plan will provide 100 feet from the future road right-of-way. Ms. Husak stated that staff has verified the future easement is for gas lines. Mr. Smith stated that he previously served as the Zoning Officer for Jerome Township, so he is familiar with the aforementioned documents. He was present when the Township, City and the County adopted the Crossroads Area Plan. That plan never contemplated land up this far. Its focus area was the area surrounding Costco, the additional piece of industrial land at the intersection of SR161 and US33, and the Jacquemin Farms and Gorden Farms pieces. The different entities were attempting to reach a common ground on that area. He also wrote the Township's Comprehensive Plan in 2009. That plan does not contemplate 200 -foot setbacks from anything. It does address land use, rural development and conservation development. Specific setbacks were not established for any roads. From a Code standpoint, rural residential lots within the Township must have a minimum setback of 50 feet from the right-of-way. From Jerome Township's perspective, additional setback for any new development within the Township is preferred. Of the last four -five past developments, however, where houses backed up to the road, nothing more than 80-100 feet was required. This development would be consistent with the Township's policy. Ms. Call stated that the bikepath is shown in the drawings as continuing along the existing trail that runs adjacent to Glacier Ridge and continuing down to the roundabout. Is there a schedule for phasing in that path along with the development? Mr. McCauley responded that it would be installed when the street paving occurs, or soon thereafter. Ms. Newell stated that one of the previous citizen comments referred to the location of the construction entrance. Has the location of that entrance been determined? Mr. McCauley stated that he does not believe it has, but he does not believe there would be any objection to having it off McKitrick Road. Ms. Fox referred to the condition requiring elimination of the home on Lot 1. Like Mr. Fishman, she does not support dry retention basins. They tend to look unfinished. From an engineering standpoint, what are the options to make it look attractive? That is at the main entrance. She Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 30 of 32 would not be opposed to having an attractive piece of architecture in that location. Otherwise, there would be an unattractive dry basin and a flat field. Ms. Call requested clarification of the reason for staffs recommendation to delete Lot 1. Mr. Ridge stated that staff recommended that it be deleted because it appeared isolated from the remaining lots, is shaped irregularly and is larger than the other lots. Mr. McCauley stated that they could agree to remove the dry basin concept, leaving it as open greenspace with some landscaping. They would work with staff on how to modify the other pond appropriately for the site. However, they do need to have Lot 1 remain. As heard tonight, the neighbors support Lot 1 remaining in the plan. Although it appears irregularly shaped in the plans, when completed, it will be as attractive as the other lots. Therefore, he would request that condition be removed. They have no objection to the remaining conditions. Ms. Kennedy and Mr. Supelak indicated that they have no objection to Lot 1 remaining. Mr. Fishman requested clarification of the height of the mounding along Hyland -Croy Road. Mr. Ridge responded that it would be three to five feet in height and include trees. Mr. Fishman stated that he would like to see it heavily landscaped, but not with landscaping material, per se. He would prefer pine trees or something that will achieve an opaque screening. Ms. Newell stated that a variety of plantings could achieve that. Mr. Fishman stated that the plan appeared to provide many deciduous trees. He requested that the applicant commit to making the screening opaque — in whatever way that might be achieved. Mr. Smith stated that there would be an opportunity for discussion of landscaping details with the Final Development Plan. They are required to bring back a Final Landscape Plan to the Commission. Ms. Newell inquired if the applicant is in agreement with the revised five conditions. Mr. McCauley confirmed the applicant was in agreement. Ms. Kennedy moved, Mr. Fishman seconded to recommend approval of the rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan to City Council with the following five conditions: 1) That the Preliminary Development Plan subarea map be revised to include the existing storm water management pond in the southeast portion of the site that is to be redesigned, prior to Council review; 2) That the applicant continue to work with staff to ensure that the street names and naming method is appropriate; 3) That the applicant work with staff to clarify HOA membership; 4) That the applicant remove the dry basin and add green space and landscaping within the area, subject to staff approval; and 5) That the applicant provide opaque landscaping in the mounding along Hyland Croy Road. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2019 Page 31 of 32 Vote: Mr. Supelak, yes; Ms. Call, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Ms. Newell, yes. [Motion passed 6-0] Ms. Newell inquired if the applicant is in agreement with the four conditions. Mr. McCauley confirmed the applicant was in agreement. Ms. Call moved, Ms. Kennedy seconded to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat to City Council with the following four conditions: 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments and updates to the plat in accordance with the accompanying Preliminary Development Plan are made prior to City Council submittal; 2) That the applicant continue to work with staff to ensure that the street names are approved and indicated appropriately on the plat; and 3) That the applicant revise the Preliminary Plat prior to Council review to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, as required by Code. 4) That the applicant revise the plat to accurately display the planned 100 -foot right-of-way for Hyland -Croy Road. Vote: Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Mr. Supelak, yes; Ms. Call, yes. [Motion passed 6-0] city of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commisison OHIO, UST December 12, 2019 19-085PP — Overlook at Tartan Summary A request for review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat to facilitate the construction of up to 56 single-family lots, new public streets, and open space reserves. Site Location The site is located northeast of the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road. Property Owners DVC 6700 Associates LLC The Shoppes at Tartan Ridge LLC Applicable Land Use Regulations Zoning Code Section 153.050-153.056 Case Manager Chase I Ridge, Planner I (614) 410-4656 cridaeadublin.oh.us Zoning Map Next Steps Upon approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and a recommendation of approval of the Preliminary Plat to City Council, the plat will be forwarded to Council for their acceptance. 0 a We pool 7w I I SITE City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 19-085PP I PUD —Tartan Ridge — Preliminary Plat Thursday, December 12, 2019 1 Page 3 of 6 2. Overview Background The approximately 24 -acre site was annexed into the City of Dublin in 2002 (Ord. 71-02) and originally rezoned in 2007 (Ord. 16-07) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, Tartan Ridge. The proposed site contains all or portions of Subareas Dl, E, and F of the larger Tartan Ridge PUD. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and provided non-binding feedback on a concept plan for this site in July of 2019. Site Characteristics Natural Features The site is undeveloped, except for a stormwater management pond that was installed as part of a previous phase of the Tartan Ridge development. There are trees and an abandoned silo located in the southwest portion of the site. A stream runs west to east in the northern portion of the site. This area included a Stream Corridor Protection Zone and the applicant will be required to study the area prior to development. Historic and Cultural Facilities The site is not located within the Historic District and does not contain any known historically contributing structures or artifacts. Surrounding Land Use and Development Character North: R: Rural District (Educational — Glacier Ridge Elementary) East: PUD: Tartan Ridge (Single -Family) South: PUD: Tartan West (Single -Family) West: Jerome Township (Park and Recreation — Glacier Ridge Metro Park) Road, Pedestrian and Bike Network The site has frontage on Hyland -Croy Road to the west (±1,365 feet) and McKitrick Road to the south (±975 feet). A shared use path exists along the eastern portion of the site with runs north off McKitrick Road. Utilities The site is served by public utilities, including sanitary and water. Electrical and gas are also provided on site. Proposal Summary This is a proposal for a residential development on approximately 24 acres with a maximum of 56 single-family homes, new public streets with sidewalks, and open spaces. Preliminary Plat The proposal includes the subdivision of an approximately 24 -acre site into 56 single-family lots with rights-of-way for new public streets and open space reserves. The plat includes open space ownership and maintenance, setback requirements, and easements. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 19-085PP I PUD —Tartan Ridge — Preliminary Plat Thursday, December 12, 2019 1 Page 4 of 6 Lot Details The preliminary plat includes 56 single-family lots generally separated into two different sizes. Based on the development text that is proposed for this development, courtyard lots are required to be a minimum of 60 feet wide at the building line with a minimum depth of 125 feet. Twenty-two courtyard lots are proposed and are located on the perimeter of the site. Patio lots are required to be a minimum of 52 feet wide at the building line and require a minimum lot depth of 125 feet. The remaining 34 lots are patio lots and are primarily located to the interior of the site. The smallest lots are 6,500 square feet and the largest lot is 10,764 square feet in size. Lot coverage is limited to 60 percent, including structures and driveways. For courtyard homes, the front yard setback is a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet from the right-of-way, or otherwise shown on the preliminary plat. For patio homes, the front yard setbacks are also a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet. However, front loaded garages must be located at the maximum setback of 25 feet while non -garage portions of the front fagade may be permitted to extend up to the minimum 15 -foot setback. Rear yard setbacks for both lot types is 25 feet from the rear property line. The minimum required side yard setback is 6 feet. Streets/Sidewalks/Shared Use Paths Primary access to the proposed lots will be from McKitrick Road via Brenham Way. Brenham Way currently ends at Baronet Boulevard; however, the street will be extended from its terminus at Baronet Boulevard to McKitrick Road to allow for access to the site. Enfield Trace currently ends in a hammerhead just east of the existing basin at the southeast portion of the site. The proposal includes extending this road to the west and connecting to the extension of Brenham Way. On the north end of the site, Emmet Row Lane will be extended to provide access to the new homes. Emmet Row Lane is proposed to terminate in a north -south orientation into Jasmine Glen Drive. Jasmine Glen Drive is proposed to curve to the south, turning into Ariel Drive. Ariel Drive will then terminate into the new extension of Brenham Way. Gaston Drive (east -west), located in the center of the site, will serve as a connection between Brenham Way, Jasmine Glen Drive and Ariel Drive. Jasmine Glen Drive is proposed to be terminated before connecting to Brenham Way, based on requests by existing residents and supported by Engineering and the Washington Township Fire Department. The proposed street names have not been approved by the City and may need additional review. All streets are to be constructed with a width of 28 feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Right-of-way widths are 50 feet. There are 15 on -street parking spaces proposed in the development, five on each of the three north -south oriented streets. Sidewalks are proposed throughout the entirety of the site, including along all frontages and leading to a proposed overlook in Reserve A (northwest portion of the site). An eight -foot wide shared use path is proposed along McKitrick Road, turning north along the entire length of Hyland -Croy Road. Staff is recommending that the applicant revise the right-of-way dedication at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road to include a typical chamfer, as required by Code. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 19-085PP I PUD —Tartan Ridge — Preliminary Plat Thursday, December 12, 2019 1 Page 5 of 6 Open Space The Subdivision Regulations require the provision of 3.56 acres of open space based on the 56 units on 24 acres of land. A total of approximately 7.9 acres (32.2%) of open space is proposed in five reserves. Reserve A (7.4 acres) is located along MCKitrick Road and Hyland -Croy Road. This reserve contains a majority of the proposed open space and includes a stormwater management pond in the northwest portion of the site and a proposed dry basin in the southeast portion of the site. The existing stormwater management pond is proposed to be slightly redesigned with this application. Reserves B, C, and D (0.4 -acre total) serve to separate the new homes from Brenham Way and the existing homes to the east. Reserve E (0.1 -acre) is located in the northeast portion of the site and serves to separate lot 26 (proposed) from the existing lot 225 in Tartan Ridge. StormwaterManagement and Utilities The proposal includes the use of three stormwater management ponds. The existing stormwater pond in the northwest portion of the site is proposed to be slightly altered with this proposal and is situated within Reserve A. Also proposed within Reserve A is a dry basin in the southeast portion of the site. The existing pond in Tartan Ridge (southeast portion of the site, east of Brenham Way) will be modified to accommodate the proposed development. The plat states that Reserves A through E are to be owned and maintained by The Overlook at Tartan Ridge homeowners association. The existing stormwater management pond east of Brenham Way is owned by the City of Dublin and is proposed to be maintained by the City of Dublin. Public utilities will be provided through public easements and/or right-of-way as shown on the preliminary plat and which will be refined as part of the final plat. Site Plan IIIH err City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 19-085PP I PUD —Tartan Ridge — Preliminary Plat Thursday, December 12, 2019 1 Page 6 of 6 3. Criteria Analysis Subdivision Regulations 1) Plat Information and Construction Requirements Criteria Met. The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Code. The applicant will be required to revise the plat to make any other minor technical adjustments prior to Council review. 2) Street, Sidewalk, and Bikepath Standards Criteria met with Condition. All necessary standards have been provided as part of the proposed preliminary plat. However, Staff is recommending that the applicant revise the preliminary plat prior to Council review to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, as required by Code. Staff is also recommending that the applicant continue to work with Staff to ensure that the street names are approvable and indicated appropriately on the plat. 3) The proposal includes provisions for all utilities in accordance with approved standards. Criteria Met. The preliminary plat identifies or establishes all necessary easements for the construction and maintenance of all utilities. 4) Open Space Requirements Criteria Met. Open space reserves are platted as part of this application, providing more open space than required for this proposal. 4. Recce------- --- -�i Planning Staff have determined that the application complies with all applicable review consideration and existing development character of the area. Staff is recommending approval with the following conditions: 1) The applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments and updates to the plat in accordance with the accompanying Preliminary Development Plan are made prior to City Council submittal; and, 2) That the applicant continue to work with Staff to ensure that the street names are approved and indicated appropriately on the plat; and, 3) That the applicant revise the preliminary plat prior to Council review to reflect a typical chamfer at the corner of Hyland -Croy Road and McKitrick Road, as required by Code.