Ordinance 039-18Davton Legal Blank, Inc.
Ordinance No. 39-18
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Form No. 30043
Passed .20.
AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 47.37 ACRES EAST
SIDE OF HYLAND-CROY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET
SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH TULLYMORE DRIVE FROM
PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (AUTUMN ROSE
WOODS) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
(AUTUMN ROSE WOODS) FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT TO PERMIT THE SPLIT -RAIL
FENCE TO REMAIN ALONG THE PERIMETER OF RESERVE C, TO BE
OWNED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN (CASE 18-0232/PDP/FDP)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, _/7
of its elected members concurring, that:
Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description,
Exhibit A), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned
Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained
in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin
Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property
owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all
incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall
be developed and used in accordance there within.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest
period allowed by law.
ATTEST:
Clerk of Council
2018.
Office of the City Manager
G of Dubh 6200Emerald Parkway r Dublin, OH 43017-1090
t Phone. 614-410-4400 o Fax; 614-410-4490� .. � _Memo
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From; Dana McDaniel, City Manag,��°�
Date; June 7, 2017
Initiated By: Vincent A, Papsidero, FAICP, Planning Director
Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner
Re: Ord, 39-18 - Rezoning approximately 47,37 acres east side of Hyland -Croy Road
approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive from
PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Autumn Rose Woods) to PUD, Planned
Unit Development District (Autumn Rose Woods) for an amendment to the
approved development text to permit the split -rail fence to remain along the
perimeter of Reserve C, to be owned by the City of Dublin (Case 18-
023Z/PDP/FDP)
t"�T7
Ordinance 39.15 is a request for review and approval of a rezoning of app�rooximately 47 acres
from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Autumn Rose Woods) to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District (Autumn Rose Woods) for an amendment to the approved development
text to permit the split -rail fence to remain along the perimeter of Reserve C, to be owned by
the City of Dublin, The site is located in Union County on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road and
north of the intersection with Park Mill Drive, The approved Preliminary Development Plan is for
73 single-family lots with approximately 21 acres of open space and Ove public streets, The
Final Development Plan is required to comply with all zoning regulations of the Planned District,
and further refine Open Space, Landscaping, Tree Replacement, Street Network, Stormwater
Management, and Utilities, The proposal does not change the density, open space or right-of-
way allocation or any other development details not related to the split -rail fence along the
boundary of Reserve D,
Background
At the March 19, 2018 City Council meeting, Council voted to direct staff to process an
application to allow the existing fence within the Autumn Woods Rose development to remain
where it was previously intended to be removed in a City -owned reserve,
On August 10, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the final development plan
and recommended approval to City Council of the final plat for the Autumn Rose Woods
subdivision, The application included all final development details,
In March 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to
City Council for the Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat, Council
subsequently reviewed the Annexation and Rezoning/Preliminary Development and Preliminary
Plat, and Infrastructure Agreement concurrently as provided for in the Pre -Annexation
Agreement entered into by the City of Dublin and Pulte Homes of Ohio via Ord, 28.16, and
Memo re. Ord. 39-18 Autumn Rose Woods-Rezoning/Preliminary and Final Development Plans
June 7, 2018
Page 2 of 4
approved Ordinances 25-17, 26-17, and 27-17, respectively at the May 22, 2017 meeting. With
the approval Annexation and Rezoning, the site was brought within the municipal boundary,
and zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District—Autumn Rose Woods. The Preliminary
Development Plan, which includes the approved Development Text, defines zoning standards
for the development of the site. At the time of the Rezoning, Council approved a waiver to the
Tree Replacement requirement defined in the
City's Zoning Code due to the substantial
preservation of nearly 16 contiguous acres of
woods.
Description
Site
The 47.37 -acre site is comprised of two
parcels and has approximately 1,000 feet of
frontage on Hyland -Croy Road with two
existing access points, one per parcel. The
site consists of two lots with approximately
1000 feet of frontage along Hyland -Croy
Road. The western portion of the site were
recently used agricultural fields, a recreational horse farm, with horse barns, paddocks and
indoor arenas are on the south. The eastern third of the site contains significant woods, which
are largely preserved as part of this proposal.
Surrounding Sites
The Bishop's Crossing subdivision to the north is zoned PLR, Planned Low Density Residential
District, and contains single family residences. Single family homes are located to the south and
east contained within the Park Place and Westbury subdivisions, respectively, and also zoned
PLR. The west, the land, including the Hyland -Croy right-of-way, is located within Jerome
Township, and contains Glacier Ridge Metro Park as well as single family homes on large, rural
lots.
Neighborhood Contact
The request for this proposal originated with one resident adjacent to the northwest portion of
this site and was further delegated to staff by City Council after the receipt of a petition of
approximately 16 adjacent residents. Staff has received correspondence in support of this
request, which is included in the meeting materials.
Preliminary Development Plan — Fence
All reserve areas within Autumn Rose Woods are to be owned by the City of Dublin once the
developer has improved the areas in accordance with the approved plans and the neighborhood
is largely developed. A large wooded area (Reserve C) has been set aside for passive use and
will be maintained by the City of Dublin. In the approved development text, the fence
surrounding the woods was to be removed so the area is open to the community at large for
the entire community to the publicly dedicated open space as well as to limit maintenance cost
to the City.
Memo re. Ord. 39-18 Autumn Rose Woods-Rezoning/Preliminary and Final Development Plans
June 7, 2018
Page 3 of 4
This proposal addresses the desire by
existing residents adjacent to the
proposed the Autumn Rose Woods to
retain this fence to ensure privacy to
their lots. As the removal of the fence
was approved in the development text,
the preliminary development plan and
the final development plan, a new
application for these processes has been
initiated by the City of Dublin to address
the retention of the fence, as instructed
by City Council.
Development Text
The proposed development text includes
language which states that the existing
perimeter paddock fencing located along the boundaries of Reserve C, west of Mill Springs
Drive and to the southern property boundary of Lot 102 in the Park Place subdivision may
remain and will be owned by the City of Dublin upon dedication of the reserve by the developer.
The text also addresses the condition of the fencing upon dedication by the developer to the
City to eliminate obligations by the City to improve the fence condition.
The City has created an exhibit to indicate the location of fencing which may remain in Reserve
C.
Open Space and Landscaping
As detailed in the text, all the open spaces will be dedicated to the City. The HOA will maintain
Reserves A, B, and F which include landscaping, paths, seating, and an entry feature.
Additionally, the HOA will maintain the existing split -rail fence, which is proposed to remain
between abutting residential lots. The City will maintain Reserves C, D. and E.
Memo re. Ord. 39-18 Autumn Rose Woods-Rezoning/Preliminary and Final Development Plans
June 7, 2018
Page 4 of 4
Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Rezoning/Preliminary
Development Plan to City Council on May 17, 2018 with no conditions. Simultaneously, the
Commission also approved a Final Development Plan. The final plat, recommended for approval
by the Commission on August 10, 2017 will be forwarded to Council once the developer has
provided the necessary infrastructure.
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 39-18 at the second reading/public
hearing on June 25, 2018.
.•
dSO
r pr
7 i
N
�We'stbury .,
rb �,
G
'Dr Oliver Way
SITE .. 'park ' 9 Walden GNB
O
0 Monticello Ln -
r � C `get pc
� n
Em
IREcEivEu III COPIMAR 2 8 DIB ng 11017
Cryaf 0YOFDUBLIN CaseM 16 .023 PDP
Dublin PLANNING
01110. USA PLANNING APPLICATION
This is dre general application form for Beards and Commissions. In additbn, applicants shouts submit a cheklist with the requirements
far the application type indloaA below Attach additional sheets If necessary
I, REVIEW REQUESTED: IL PROPERTY INFORMATION: n i
the promh iwludimg ending and imLi, I.r
"11041,
ll'.
0 Amended Nfal Development Plan
0 Amended Final Development Plan • Sign
0 Andstaii Review Board
0 Basle Development Plan Review
0 Bask Site Plan Review
0 Building Code Appeal
o Community Plan Amendment
0 Coni Plan
0 Conditional Use
0 Development Nan Review •Bridge Street District
o Development Plan Resew • West Innovatorl District
C Demo lion
III RNNI Development Plan
0 Foal Plot
0Infofri Review
0 Master Sign Plan
0 Minor Modification
0 Mina Protect Revieww
0 MlnorSubdivlsion
0 Ni (Area) Variance
IIIPreliminary Development Plan�PUD Rezoning
0 Preliminary Plat
0 Site Plan Review • Bridge Street Dlddd
0 She Nan Review • West Innovadon Nshid
0 Spedal Permit
C Standard District Rezoning
0 vise Valiance
0 Waver Review
0 Wireless Communications Padllt
0 bring Code Amendment
Ad
PmPerty asl:
7540 and 7660 Hyland Croy Road, Gly dDubrn Union Courcy
Tar ID/Parti Number(s)
Parcel 91 in Acres
(UstWI:
(UR Ed Separably):
7540• Parcd I7D0lgomoa0
7540.16,0 ac
76a0 • Pared 17002901 IM
7660. ID 11 ac
Eelsdng IBM UNICesdtpndit:
Ming Zoning ehldd:
AinaltureaSP
PUD
Proposed laM UNIDeAelopment
Prop ed Zonate; wid:
Planned single family
PUD
residential
Name(Indhidral or Ogrd *):
'ulte Homes of Ohio LLC
Mailing Add=(Street, Clty, swffi lip),
4900 Tuttle Crossing, Dublin, OH 43016
EmdpPhone Nuft
For questions or more Inkmalbn, please cmW Planning at 614410.4600 1 www,dubllnohioUS4.gov
0 4
IV. APPLICANT(S)I Corti this section f Lvtilwil mgamcaoon represmumg IN 3ppbranN prnprry WIA is diNemm hrtm the ayph(ant.
NotApplka6le
Name (ImdNldual mOrganuatlan): Dana L Call
Me4kg Addr� (Shaer Ory, Stale, Zll ONee tithe I Homage(, 5700 Emerald Park", Dublln, Ohio 43017
Phone Number: 614-010.4400
Ema0dmodarb ill ul us
V. REPRESENTATNE(Sj: Complete this section it the persow crganuat:anieprownling tae appliranll pros %Nrtc Awrit:rum the
oppllram porn ar the prgal wouger or Hol owner's ryal (Donal).
Not Applicable
Name (hi a OrgonuaUanl: Claudla D Husak
Ha111ng AdkdS (SM Ory, SWe, ZIPI DM of Plmxng $M Stan tial ii Dublin; Ohio 43016
Phone Whom 614.4104675
EmaR dhusailIft linohus
VI, PROPERTY
OWNER'S
AUTHORIZATION
OF APPLICANIl
AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE: The paoerh pwrmr
ismdinSstiav;IIruJattrruetheA
llrao[I%1NJInErIDnnIVardlortheAdhorindpnpra;rntaiea'irdedmSeilollVtoad)n;he
Oroer's
behalhem respell:o
his
rlppli(ahon
Not Applicable
I PUYalloea dont, ILC ,ue propal offing he* auIhlbe II Mil 1 O D HIM
To ad 15 they In all matters pe to to the processing and approA dahis applllor, Ing rtudfatlon to the
appllratiom tagreekbeboundbyalliepremtatlonamn alw memsm de Yt'I adr mated representative(luted In Settlors N sntllm N).
cog lin*nannum Of Proper Oman(Oshad In Sadion ll),� ar�i r'ayrtr
in,vF/6
Subscribed and swam befa
ski 010
Eoul r*4111
KAREN N. SNIDER
RCIaNFa tSTLI[0r ok0
arCOa MIREabE1111 13F7071
VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: 6:k visits to the MNM nV City rryre mstio one essential m process the
apph(ahun The property owns r/ ARbtanq Author 2(d Pop rescir c1lsed nSmaim Il), INeby 31 owns Gty cl lvf sto unlet
photogii, and post u nobs on the property dewrbed in I Iapphwuono Ihrs is oploui Nut soonply reammended.
reareaternal to 111 #4 raph and pout a ril an the property dei on the api bell
For questions or mare information, piedee cork Plaodng at 614,410,4600 1 hwio dubllnohioUSAgw
VIM APPLICANPS AFFIDAVIT OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Thn SWIM mml b<ccn¢land vmm ail original signature aril notarived.
U Original Daument Attached
ISd4Lddla �. NusCak
to propadpowner orauthoboot representative, have rad and understand
Na camatsof lhlsappllatlooThe Inforri ronalned In this epplla oln, attached eM and other I cartoon AdmipM is to
and
In At respects he and correct to beat of myInowledpe and belid.
OrlgMal NphMure of Pi owner or Adhi Representative: /I' yl /AU,T, ...I... Doh: 4•3•IB
SubsodbMand mom how methis L dry of._,Zd�F
Mad o f rl1
untyofFra"l<I'" NaeryPubll b
Ca
Car TMs: PUD - Autumn Rose Woodsg1w
b:
Case Number 18-023ZIPDPIFDPAmountRecehrcd:
N/A
Due DaaNIA :
Revlei pody(Onto Oni ART ARA IZA aDeterminable:
Mop Zane: R-
DMerntoatloo orAddon:
maw Casae
Ordidara Number (If APpllable): ?301118
Ma@ 18 2818
CITY OF DUBLIN
Pill COPY
For questions or more informatory blase counted Planning at 614.410.4600 1www,duNtnoMoUS4.gou
— Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
DESCRIPTION OF 47.37 ACRE TRACT
UNION COUNTY, OHIO
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Jerome, Virginia Military Survey No. 3452,
and being part of a 32.328 acre tract as deeded to J.H. Means in Deed Book 278, Page 714, part of a
9.3672 acre tract and part of a 6.6328 acre tract as deeded to R. Oliver Griffith & Deborah L. Griffith in
Deed Book 286, Page 186, all being of record in the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio and being
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point common to said 32.328 acre tract and the easterly right-of-way line of
Hyland -Croy Road;
Thence, North 85012'05" East, with the common line said 32.328 acres and of Bishop's Crossing
Subdivision, of record in Plat Book 5, Page 117, a distance of 1979.28 feet to the common comer of said
32.328 acre tract and of Lot 27 in said Bishop's Crossing Subdivision and the westerly line of Lot 107 in
Park Place Section 4, of record in Plat Cabinet 5, Page 70-72;
Thence, South 16036'38" East, with the common line of said 32.328 acres and Park Place Section
4, a distance of 688.57 feet to a the southeast corner of said 32.328 acre tract and also being a point on a
northerly line of Reserve "F", Replat of Lot 73, Park Place Section 3 and Reserve F, Park Place Section 4,
of record in Plat Cabinet 5, Page 146;
Thence, South 85°16'45" West, with the common line of said 32.328 acres and said Replat of Lot
73, Park Place Section 3 and Reserve F, Park Place Section 4, a distance of 424.71 feet to a point on the
southerly line of said 32.328 acres and being the northeast corner of said 9.3672 acre tract;
Thence, South 402426" East, with common line of said 9.3672 acres and said Park Place Section
4, a distance of 400.23 feet to the southeast corner of said 9.3672 acres and also being a point common
with the westerly line Lot 73 in Park Place Section 3, of record in Plat Cabinet 5, Page 65;
Thence, South 85013'45" West, with the common line of said 9.3672 acres and of said 6.6328
acres and said Park Place Section 3, and of Park Place Section 2 of record in Plat Cabinet 5, Page 41, and
of Park Place Section 1, of record in Plat Cabinet 5, Page 33-35, a distance of 1702.94 feet to a point
common easterly rightof--way, line of Hyland -Croy;
Thence, North 4015'23" West, along the easterly right-of-way line of Hyland -Croy, a distance of
1072.86 feet, to the POINT OF TRUE BEGINNING, containing 47.37 acres, more or less.
Basis of Bearing is based on observations, measurements, and calculations of the location of the
boundary evidence, referenced to a grid meridian of North 4'1523" West for the centerline of Hyland -
Croy Road, as determined by static observations and post processed by an NGS OPUS solution.
File Name: 150-620-47.357(Meas)-ACRES-ZONE
CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
FILE COPY
r6 oaIuv�e RECEIVED'
MAR 2 B 2018
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING
Page 1 of 1
2S0 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Suite 250 1 Worthington, Ohio 43085 I F: 614-540-6633 C 614.540-6638 I www.cecinc.00m
18-023Z/PDP/FDP
Autumn Rose Woods
Board of Park Commissioners
7825 Hyland Croy Rd.
Plain City, OH 43064
Arthur & Elizabeth Wesner
7485 Hyland Croy Rd.
Plain City, OH 43064
Richard & Susanne Ryu
7487 Wisdom Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Michael & Kathleen McFadin
7505 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Natasha Holland
7529 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Robert & Margaret Whipple
6778 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Tarun & Payal Kumar
6754 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
*Pulte Home of Ohio LLC
4900 Tuttle Crossing
Dublin, OH 43016
Gentry Charles W & et al
7525 Hyland Croy Rd.
Plain City, OH 43064
Keith & Hollis Olszewski
7471 Wisdom Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Christopher & Rachel Black
7495 Wisdom Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Tom & Deborah Rodgers
7513 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Robert & Kelly Heavilin
7537 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Timothy & Senay Merimee
6770 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Chowdari & Lavanya Garapati
6736 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Andrew & Sandra Hite
7505 Hyland Croy Rd.
Plain City, OH 43064
Tirupati Balaga
7479 Wisdom Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Yaqiu Zhao
7502 Barrister Dr.
Dublin, OH 43016
Francis & Nichole Sudal
7521 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Alycia & Gabriel Cassini
7545 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017
Chandran & SasipriyaNatarajan
6762 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Sindhu & Rajgopal Padmini
6598 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
erg Brian & Andrea Gunnoe Cynthia Woodruff
6604 U.�nr 6614 Park Mill Dr. 6622 Park Mill Dr.
P44n, 0144401T Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017
Lauralee McCloskey Ted Oiler Anterpreets & Poonam Neki
6630 Park Mill Dr. 6638 Park Mill Dr. 7501 Pharoah Ct.
Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43016
Taehoon Kim & Jihyun Lee Jinghong Yu Huawen Zhu
7493 Pharoah Ct. 6851 Bishops Crossing Circle 6843 Bishops Crossing Circle
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Ganesh Mallappa Robert & Kathryn Schwinnen
6835 Bishops Crossing Circle 6827 Bishops Crossing Circle 6919 Bishops C..,.,., ing Cifel.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Publin, 014
Guohong Shen Mark & Jill Blazek Xiangrong Zhang
6811 Bishops Crossing Circle 6803 Bishops Crossing Circle 7602 Mill Springs Dr.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Jerry & Cheryl Allen Dominic & Rebecca Ciminilo George & Kyoko Grahovac
6791 Burnside Ln. 6783 Burnside Ln. 6775 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
(Lance and Sharon Goodfellow)*
Mark & Kathleen Cripe Ankur & Runa Gupta v.
6767 Burnside Ln. 6759 Burnside Ln. C [ 1
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Publin, 014
Raymond & Leslie Cogan Robert & Michelle Clawson Brett & Julia Turley
6743 Burnside Ln. 6735 Burnside Ln. 6727 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Xiaorui Wang Benjamin Dodds Senthia Balasubramanian
7480 Wisdom Ln. 7488 Wisdom Ln. 7486 Barrister Dr.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43016
Vadim Fedorov Sreenivasa Machapalli Gunurajan Sakkubair
7478 Barrister Dr. 7477 Barrister Dr. 7485 Barrister Dr.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Bradley & Christine Pope Thomas & Jacqueline Adams Matthew & Daron Ducay
7497 Marston Ln. 7498 Marston Ln. 7510 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017
Priyadharshini Narayanamoorthy Cathy Anne O'Brien
7520 Marston Ln. 7540 Marston Ln. 6?03 Pa -d- M-Pf.
Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Publin, 014
Ramanujam Thiruvenkatachari
Norma Wheeler
Mel & Paula Coffland
6755 Park Mill Dr.
6747 Park Mill Dr.
6728 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Dublin, OH 43017
Dublin, OH 43017
Jimmy He & Wen Hau Yang
David & Sandra Buttke
Yanli Wang & Yong Xu
6720 Park Mill Dr.
6615 Park Mill Dr.
6623 Park Mill Dr.
Dublin, OH 43017
Dublin, OH 43017
Dublin, OH 43017
Noven William & Robin Vaden
Satya & Sudha Chauhan
Bryan & Melissa Wicks
7492 Pharoah Ct.
7484 Pharoah Ct.
7476 Pharoah Ct.
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Yanhua Xue & Mang Fang
Rajesh & Reena Jindal
Alan & Joely Johnson
6844 Bishops Crossing Circle
7613 Conley Ln.
7612 Conley L.
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Neeru & Brijesh Mishra
Kendra & James Conrad
Madhavan Gnanasundaram
7610 Mill Spring Dr.
7618 Mill Springs Dr.
7619 Mill Springs Dr.
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Kenney & Yvonne Kozlowski
Terry & Margaret Bartsch
John & Juliamme Messmore
7626 Mill Springs Dr.
6808 Burnside Ln.
6799 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Phillip Izenson
Asif & Zoobia Ahmed
Neil & Neha Makadia
6792 Burnside Ln.
6760 Burnside Ln.
6752 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43016
Joseph & Patricia George Lisa & Matthew Forney
6744 Burnside Ln. 6728 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Vinayak & Girija Paryate Sorab Chhibber & Neeru Sharma
6711 Burnside Ln. 6704 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016
Bishop's Run/Crossing HOA Oak Park HOA
c/o Kris Miller c/o Rosemarie Deschler
7898 Tullymore Dr. 7023 Greenland Pl.
Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017
Keith & Leslie Hammond Alycia & Gabriel Cassini
6965 Post Preserve Blvd. 7545 Marston Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43017
Wyndham Village HOA
Celtic Crossing HOA
c/o Mike Maloof
c/o Tammy Seitz, RPM
6308 Wyler Ct
5550 Blazer Pkwy #175
Dublin, OH 43016
Dublin, OH 43017
Johnston Means Charles Zhang
7660 Hyland Croy Rd. 7620 Mill Springs Dr.
Plain City, OH 43064 Dublin, OH, 43016
Alejandro & Aida Colon
6719 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Ryan & Melanie Burnside
6703 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Park Plan/Post Preserve HOA
c/o Melissa Bogner
6718 Monticello Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Westbury HOA
c/o Omni Community Assoc.Mangr.
Jody Shockley
P.O.Box 395
Grove City, OH 43123
R. Oliver and Deborah Griffith
7540 Hyland Croy Rd.
Plain City, OH 43064
Lance and Sharon Goodfellow
6783 Burnside Ln.
Dublin, OH 43016
Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat—
Development Text
AUTUMN ROSE
WOODS
D u b I i n, O h i o
Developer.
Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC
4900Tuttle Crossing Blvd.
Dublin, OH 43016
Phone: (614) 376-1018
Contact: Matt Callahan
Legal.
Isaac Wiles Burkholder & Teetor, LLC
Two Miranova Place, Suite 700
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: (614) 340-7415
Contact: Thomas L. Hart, Esq.
Land Planning/
Landscape Architecture:
The EDGE Group
330 West Spring Street, Suite 350
Columbus, OH 43215
Phone: (614) 486-3343
Contact: Greg Chillog
Engineering:
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
250 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Suite 250
Worthington, OH 43085
Phone: (614) 540-6633
Contact: Michael C. Reeves
Draft Submittal for Approval: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission, October 3, 2016
Approved: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission, March 2, 2017
Draft Submittal for Approval: Dublin City Council, April 10, 2017
Approved: Dublin City Council, May 22, 2017
Revision Approved: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission, May 17, 2018
As submitted to City Council for First Reading on lune 11, 2018 and Second Reading on lune 25, 2018
AUTUMN ROSE WOODS
Table of Contents
SECTION I - Development Overview
I.
LOCATION AND SIZE 2
II.
E%ISTING CONDITIONS AND CHARACTER 2
III.
ANALYSIS OF NATU RAL RESOURCES FOR 3
III.
CONSERVATION DESIGN
IV.
E%ISTING LAND USE 4
V.
PROPOSED LAND USE S
VI.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE S
VII.
PROVISION OF UTILITIES 6
VIII.
ACCESS AND CIRCULATION 7
IX.
PHASING 8
SECTION II - Development Standards
I.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
10
II.
PERMITTED USES
10
III.
DENSITY
10
IV.
LOTSTANDARDS
10
V.
STREETACCESS AND/OR
11
IMPROVEMENTS
VI.
STREETSTANDARDS
12
VII.
UTILITIES
13
VIII.
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
13
IX.
TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL
14
AND REPLACEMENT
X.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
14
XI.
ARCHITECTURE
1S
XII.
LANDSCAPING
19
XIII.
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
21
SECTION I -
Development Overview
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
I. Location and Size
Development Overview
A. The site is located at 7660 and 7540 Hyland -Croy Road, within Jerome Township, Union County
with a pending annexation to the City of Dublin.
B. The site is located approximately 4,300' north of the intersection of Post Road and 3,400' south
of Brand Road.
C. There is approximately 1,075' of frontage along Hyland -Croy Road.
D. The site measures approximately 2,125' east/west and 1,075' north/south and is generally
rectangular in shape.
E. The site is ±47.37 acres in area.
II. Existing Conditions and Character
A. The site is in the North Fork Indian Run Watershed. The site generally drains from the perimeter of
the property to an area in the southeast corner of the site.
B. The site is located entirely out of the 100 -year floodplain.
C. Mature tree rows exist along the north and south property lines. A large wooded area, ±16.0 acres in
size, exists on the eastern portion of the site. This wooded area is adjacent to the Park Place Park. A
detailed tree survey was completed in March, 2016 for areas of the site where development will
occur and within fifty (50) feet of proposed development areas.
D. The western half of the site is agricultural land.
E. A preliminary ecological investigation found existing wetlands on the site. The extents of the
wetlands are pending verification. The study was performed by Civil & Environmental Consultants,
Inc. in January, 2016.
F. The site is generally flat; sloping less than 1%. There are no steep slopes. Highpoints are located at
the northwest corner (elevation 932), southwest corner (elevation 932) and northeast corner
(elevation 930). A low point (elevation 926) is located along the southern boundary.
G. Two single family homes exist on the site, near the edge of the large wooded area. Several barns,
arenas and paddocks are located in the southern portion of the site, these are part of a horseback
riding and equine facility. Several other smaller outbuildings and garages are associated with the
single-family homes.
H. The site is surrounded by single-family subdivisions to the north, south and east.
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
III. Analysis of Natural Resources
A. Primary Conservation Areas
1. Wetlands
Development Overview
a. Wetlands are identified on the site, per the Site Assessment Letter. The wetlands are in a
wooded area in the southeast corner of the site and identified as "Reserve E."
b. There are no naturally occurring ponds on the site.
c. No jurisdictional streams exist on the site per the Site Assessment Letter.
d. There is no river frontage on this site.
2. Floodplains
a. 100 -year floodplain areas do not exist on the site.
b. There are no Stream Corridor Protection Zones on the site.
3. Steep Slopes
a. There are no steep slopes on the site. The site is generally sloping less than 1%.
B. Secondary Conservation Areas
1. Soils
a. Approximately 79.5% of the site is covered in Brookston silty clay loam, fine texture, 0 to 2
percent slopes.
b. Approximately 20.5% of the site is covered in Crosby silt loam, Southern Ohio Till Plain, 0
to 2 percent slopes.
c. On-site sewage disposal is not proposed for this development, eliminating the need to
define areas for filtering effluent.
2. Woodlands
a. A large wooded area, approximately sixteen (16) acres in size, occupies most of the eastern
portion of the site. This wooded area is contiguous with the preserved woods in Park Place
Park at the southeast corner of the site.
3
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Overview
b. A mature tree row exists along the northern property line. This tree row varies in quality
and density.
c. A detailed tree survey was completed in March, 2016 for areas of the site where
development will occur and within fifty (50) feet of proposed development areas.
3. Farmland
a. Agricultural land/farmland is present on most of the western portion of the site.
4. Views Into and Out from the Site
a. Significant open space views exist from Hyland -Croy Road across the site. The existing
woodlands provide a backdrop to the views on the east.
b. View corridors exist along the east and west side of Hyland -Croy Road. Developed areas on
the east side of Hyland -Croy Road provide views across a large scenic setback with rural
character.
5. Significant Wildlife Habitats
a. A preliminary investigation did not identify any significant wildlife habitats on site.
6. Historic, Archaeological and Cultural Features
a. A preliminary investigation did not identify any buildings, ruins, earthworks, stone walls or
other resources with historic, archaeological or cultural significance on the site.
C. The primary and secondary conservation areas are generally located on the eastern half of the site
and along the Hyland -Croy Road Corridor. With most of the natural resources located within these
areas, a larger, contiguous development zone is defined east of the Hyland -Cory Road setback on
the west to the wooded areas on the eastern portion of the site.
IV. Existing Land Uses
A. Existing uses are rural residential and agricultural. Autumn Rose Farm currently operates as a
horseback riding and training facility.
B. The site is currently zoned in Jerome Township as Agricultural.
C. The site is bordered by the Bishop's Crossing Subdivision to the north and the Park Place
Subdivision to the south and east. Glacier Ridge Metro Park is located west of the site, across
Hyland -Croy Road.
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Overview
D. Surrounding land uses include: suburban residential low density, rural residential/agricultural and
parks/open space.
E. Surrounding densities range from 2.00 du/ac. to 2.25 du/ac for residential uses.
V. Proposed Land Uses
A. Proposed uses are single family residential, parks, open space and permitted uses as outlined in the
R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District in the Dublin Zoning Code.
B. The Northwest Glacier Ridge Special Area Plan identifies this site to be developed as "Infill
Residential."
C. The proposed zoning classification is PUD —Planned Unit Development. The proposal is to develop
the tract with 72 new single-family lots, maintaining an existing single-family home, while
preserving a significant wooded area and rural road corridor and complementing adjacent
development.
D. Fee simple single family lots in widths from seventy (70) to eighty (80) feet, with typical setbacks,
will provide high quality homes on 9,100 square foot lots. One of the existing single family homes
will remain on a larger wooded lot.
E. This is an infill development site. Location and the type and style of development proposed for the
site is dictated by bordering developments and natural features. The proposed uses are
complementary to the adjacent uses. When compared to homes in adjacent neighborhoods, this
development will provide homes having equal or higher quality and character.
A. Parks and Open Space
A. A total of ±21.38 acres (±45.19/o) of the development will be preserved for parks and open spaces.
B. The parks and open space system within the proposed development will be developed around the
existing wooded area and rural roadway setback. These areas will function as both passive and
active green spaces and designated park areas.
C. A prominent wooded area approximately sixteen (16) acres in size becomes the organizing element
for the new community as well as the existing surrounding neighborhood. This park provides easy
access and visibility to a preserved natural feature for the proposed development as well as
surrounding neighborhoods.
D. A shared -use path system, within the open space areas, will provide access to the greater citywide
system.
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Overview
E. Parks and open space areas within the development will be owned by the City of Dublin and
maintained by the City of Dublin and the homeowner's association.
VII. Provision of Utilities
A. General
1. All utilities, including sanitary sewer, water, telephone, electric, and gas, are available at this
site.
2. All utilities will be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of
Dublin Engineer, which includes the City of Columbus standards as required.
3. A comprehensive storm water management system will meet Ohio EPA and City of Dublin
design criteria.
4. All utilities shall be placed in appropriate locations on the lots that will best preserve the
existing trees, subject to engineering practices and standards of the City Engineer.
B. Sanitary Sewer
1. Sanitary sewer service to Autumn Rose Woods is accessible from one location.
2. The majority of the proposed development will be serviced from an existing 10 -inch sanitary
sewer line that is stubbed to the southern property line between lots 44 and 45 of Park Place
Section 1 and was designed to accommodate approximately 48.3 acres of tributary area at 10
people per acre.
3. Offsite sanitary sewer improvements are not expected at this time.
C. Water
1. An existing 12 -inch water main along the east side of Highland -Croy Road is extended to the
site from the north and the south. The 12 -inch water main will be extended across the site as
part of the development.
2. Public water mains will be constructed along the proposed roadways within the development.
3. The existing 8 -inch water mains stubbed at the end of Spring Mill Drive and Barrister Drive
will be tied into the new public system which will aid in service to this site.
D. Storm Water Post Developed
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Overview
In the post -development condition, the site drainage will be handled by an on-site retention
basin that will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs and
sidewalks and some rear yard drainage. The total developed tributary area to the basins includes
approximately 38 acres with a composite runoff curve number of 81. An additional 47 acres of
off-site drainage will pass through the site. The analysis was run using the allowable release
rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. The outlet of the basin drains to the storm sewer
stubbed to the site from the Park Place development. Water quality is provided using the wet
basin per Ohio EPA and City of Dublin requirements. The outlet for the basin will be a two-
stage outlet, with the first stage providing the required 24-hour water quality drawdown. The
second stage controls the allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan.
2. The City of Dublin will maintain all storm water management areas.
VIII. Access, Circulation and Improvements
A. Vehicular access to the site will be from a single access point on Hyland -Croy Road and from two
(2) existing streets stubbed to the property, connecting to the surrounding neighborhoods.
B. A full service, site access drive from Hyland -Croy Road will provide primary vehicular access.
C. Mill Spring Drive extends from the Bishop's Crossing neighborhood to connect with the proposed
street network.
D. Barrister Drive extends from the Park Place neighborhood to connect with the proposed street
network.
E. Vehicular circulation through the development provides neighborhood connectivity while
discouraging cut -through circulation.
F. Pedestrian connections will provide access to the surrounding shared -use path network and regional
parks/open space network.
G. A southbound left turn lane shall be provided at the Hyland -Croy Road site access as detailed in the
TIS.
IX. Phasing
A. Phasing will start with Section 1 as identified on the Preliminary Plat and will continue based on
market conditions and housing absorption.
B. Phase 1 includes removal of all or some of the existing equestrian buildings and residence on the
southern property parcel, removal of fences, construction of a southbound Highland -Croy Road left
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Overview
turn lane, the main site access drive, street connection to Barrister Drive, Reserves X B and C,
Basin A and 37 lots Section 1.
C. Phase 2 will include Reserves D and E and 36 lots in Section 2.
SECTION II -
Development Standards
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS Development Standards
I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development standards are addressed in this PUD text regarding proposed density, general site
issues, traffic, circulation, landscaping, and architecture. These component standards ensure
consistency and quality throughout the development. Where submitted drawings or this text define or
articulate a development or zoning standard the same shall be applicable and govern this PUD.
Where the submitted drawings or this text do not define standards, Chapters 152 and 153 of the City
of Dublin Code shall apply.
II. PERMITTED USES
A. Single-family detached homes.
B. Parks and open spaces.
C. Permitted uses as outlined in the R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District in the Dublin
Zoning Code.
III. DENSITY
A. A maximum of seventy-three (73) residential dwelling units shall be permitted in this PUD.
B. A maximum gross density of 1.55 dwelling units per acre shall be permitted in this PUD.
IV. LOT STANDARDS
Single-family homes in this development will be constructed on traditional lots with fee simple
ownership. Specific lot standards shall apply to each of these development types:
A. Fee Simple Lots
1. Lot Size
a. Lot Area: Nine thousand one hundred (9,100) square feet minimum.
b. Lot Width: Seventy (70) feet minimum.
c. Lot Depth: One hundred twenty-five (125) feet minimum.
2. Lot Setbacks
a. Front yard: There shall be a minimum front yard setback of twenty (20) feet from the
right-of-way line or as shown on the approved preliminary plat. The requirements of the
10
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
Subdivision Regulations Chapter 152.019(C)(6) shall not be applicable to this
development.
b. Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet minimum.
c. Side yard: Six (6) feet minimum.
d. Hyland -Croy Road: There shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of one
hundred fifty (150) feet from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right-of-way. Streets,
utilities, storm water management, landscaping, shared -use paths, open space, park
amenities and entry features may be located within this setback to enhance the rural
character of the Hyland -Croy Road corridor.
V. STREET ACCESS AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS
A. Access
1. Hyland -Croy Road:
a. One full service access shall be provided as indicated on the Preliminary Plat.
2. Mill Springs Drive:
a. Mill Springs Drive shall be extended from the Bishop's Crossing neighborhood to
connect with the proposed street network as indicated on the Preliminary Plat.
3. Barrister Drive:
a. Barrister Drive shall be extended from the Park Place neighborhood to connect with the
proposed street network as indicated on the Preliminary Plat
3. Pedestrian Access:
a. A shared -use path shall be provided in the Hyland -Croy Road setback that connects
existing shared -use pathways stubbed at the north and south boundaries. Final
alignments shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan.
b. An existing shared -use path shall be extended from the Park Place neighborhood,
connecting to the proposed pedestrian circulation system along Oliver Way.
c. An existing shared -use path shall be extended from the Bishop's Run neighborhood,
along the east side of Mill Springs Drive, connecting to the proposed pedestrian
circulation system.
d. A shared use path, within Reserve C, shall provide a connection from the playground
area in Park Place Park to the pedestrian circulation system along Oliver Way. This
11
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
pathway shall be field located to minimize impacts to the existing trees. Final design
details, including material, shall be presented for approval as part of the Final
Development Plan.
5. Private Driveways
a. Vehicular access shall be limited to one (1) driveway curb -cut per lot.
B. Improvements
1. Hyland -Croy Road Site Access:
a. A southbound left turn lane shall be provided at the Hyland -Croy Road site access, as
detailed in the TIS, as part of Section 1.
2. Off -Site Traffic Improvements:
a. Any required off-site traffic improvements based on the findings of the TIS, shall be
identified and included in an infrastructure agreement between the developer and the
City of Dublin, as approved by City Council, or as a condition of preliminary plat
approval if no infrastructure agreement is completed.
VI. STREET STANDARDS
A. Public Streets
1. Right -of -Way Width: Fifty (50) feet minimum
2. Pavement Width: Twenty-eight (28) feet minimum for all public streets, as measured
back -of -curb to back -of -curb
3. Drive Lanes: Two (2)
4. Parking Lanes: Parking shall be permitted on one side of public streets internal to
the site opposite the waterline and fire hydrants.
5. Tree Lawn: May vary based on existing vegetation, but shall in no case be less
than eight (8) feet in width.
6. Sidewalk: Four (4) feet wide minimum; sidewalks shall be concrete and
located on both sides of the street except where a shared use path
may be utilized in lieu of a sidewalk, as shown on the Pedestrian
Circulation Plan.
7. Shared -use path: Eight (8) feet wide minimum; shared -use paths shall be constructed
of asphalt, except when located in front of lots. When located in
12
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS Development Standards
front of lots, the path shall be constructed of concrete with saw cut
joints.
VII. UTILITIES
A. Design and Construction
1. All utilities shall be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City
of Dublin Engineer, which includes City of Columbus standards as required.
B. Location
1. All utilities shall be placed in appropriate locations on the individual home lots that will best
preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition.
VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
A. Design and Construction
1. A comprehensive storm water management system shall be developed, following the Ohio
EPA and City of Dublin storm water management policies.
2. In the post -development condition, the site drainage will be handled by an on-site retention
basin that will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs
and sidewalks and some rear yard drainage. The total developed tributary area to the basins
includes approximately 38 acres with a composite runoff curve number of 81. An additional
47 acres of off-site drainage will pass through the site. The analysis was run using the
allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. The outlet of the basin drains to
the storm sewer stubbed to the site from the Park Place development. Water quality is
provided using the wet basin per Ohio EPA and City of Dublin requirements. The outlet for
the basin will be a two-stage outlet, with the first stage providing the required 24-hour water
quality drawdown. The second stage controls the allowable release rates from the Storm
Water Master Plan.
3. The City of Dublin will maintain all storm water management areas.
B. Location
1. Storm water management facilities maybe located in any reserve areas or easements. Final
design and details will be provided in the Final Development Plan.
C. Maintenance Responsibility
1. The City of Dublin shall maintain all storm water structures/areas.
13
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
A. Tree Preservation/Removal
1. It is the intent of the developer to preserve as many good and fair condition trees as possible
on site. A good faith effort will be made to preserve existing trees in good and fair
condition. The developer will work with staff at the final development plan stage to identify
appropriate measures and best practices to ensure continued preservation.
2. A Tree Removal and Preservation Plan will be provided as part of the Final Development
Plan.
a. Tree protection fencing shall be shown on the Tree Removal and Preservation Plan at or
beyond the critical root zone of all trees to be preserved.
3. City approval of tree protection fencing locations shall be required prior to the issuance of
construction permits.
4. If critical root zones of preserved trees cannot be maintained during construction, those
impacted trees shall be replaced in accordance with code.
B. Tree Replacement Plan
1. Tree Replacement shall be per code, except that non -landmark trees (less than 24" DBI)
shall be replaced at a rate of one tree for each removed and subject to replacement.
2. Replacement trees maybe located in all open space reserve areas.
3. A minimum of three hundred one and one-half (301.5) caliper inches shall be replaced on
site.
4. Replacement trees shall be appropriately located to ensure the long-term survival of the
replacement trees, per staff approval.
X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
A. Dedication
1. The open space will meet that which is required under code.
2. All open space reserves shall be dedicated to the City.
a. Prior to dedication of Reserve C to the City, the developer shall:
14
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
B. Maintenance
Development Standards
i. Fell all standing dead trees within fall/striking distance to private property
(as determined by tree height).
ii. Fell all standing dead trees within seventy-five (75) feet of all paths.
iii. Remove all "Invasive Species" (to be identified in the Final Development
Plan) within seventy-five (75) feet of all paths and property edges.
1. Reserves A, B and F shall be maintained by the homeowner's association. Storm water
structures in these reserves shall be maintained by the City of Dublin.
2. Reserves C, D and E shall be maintained by the City. Storm water structures in these
reserves shall be maintained by the City of Dublin.
C. Programming
1. All reserves shall be programmed in conjunction with city staff as passive and active areas at
the time of anticipated open space development.
2. Open space programming may include the following options and amenities:
a. Reserves A and B: shared -use path, entry features, seating, landscaping and/or storm
water management facilities.
b. Reserve C: soft -surface shared -use path, fencm playgrounds, trash and
recycling receptacles, bike racks, seating, landscaping and/or storm water
management facilities.
c. Reserve D: shared -use path.
d. Reserves E and F: landscaping
3. Future design and development of parks and open spaces shall be permitted with
administrative approval based on the above programming standards.
XI. ARCHITECTURE
A. Architectural Standards
1. Architectural standards are addressed in this text regarding plan approval, character,
diversity, permitted materials and colors, configuration of materials and architectural
elements.
15
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
2. Unless otherwise set forth herein, all structures shall meet the City of Dublin Zoning Code
Residential Appearance Standards, except the existing home on lot 8 as identified on the
preliminary plat The existing home on lot 8 shall be exempt from the Residential
Appearance Standards. Future additions or new builds on this lot shall meet the Residential
Appearance Standards.
B. Architectural Diversity
1. The same or similar front elevations shall not be repeated within:
a. Two lots on either side of subject lot.
b. Three lots directly across the street from subject lot
c. Any lot on a cul-de-sac bulb.
2. Corner lots apply to the street on which the home's front facade is situated.
3. Open Space areas may provide similar separation as lots within the influenced area. In this
case, the open space area may be considered as influenced lot or lots.
4. A lot diversity matrix will be presented for approval at the final development plan phase.
C. Plan Approval
1. The Master Developer shall retain the right of individual plan approval for all home designs
within the PUD.
D. Permitted Building Height
1. Maximum of thirty-five (35) feet, as measured per code.
E. Permitted Exterior Materials
1. Cladding Materials
a. The exterior cladding of all structures on all lots shall be finished using all natural
materials, including brick, thin brick, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered
wood, fiber -cement siding products, stucco or any combination thereof.
b. Stucco shall be prohibited as a cladding material on Lots 1, 37 and 38-46 as indicated on
the Preliminary Plat.
2. Trim Materials
a. Wood, aluminum, urethane foam, EIFS, copper or fiber -cement products.
16
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
b. Shutters shall be considered as trim for the purpose of meeting the Residential
Appearance Code requirements.
3. Roofing Materials
a. All homes shall utilize dimensional asphalt shingles, wood, slate, concrete, or tile.
Standing seam metal roofs are permitted on porches and secondary roofs.
b. Roof penetrations shall be painted to match the color of the roof material.
F. Permitted Exterior Colors
1. Cladding Colors
a. Muted colors, natural earth tones, neutrals and whites are permitted.
b. High-chroma colors are not permitted.
2. Trim Colors
a. Muted colors, natural earth tones, neutrals and whites, complementary or contrasting to
siding color, are permitted.
b. High-chroma colors are not permitted.
3. Roofing Colors
a. Natural earth tones and/or neutral colors, including black.
b. High-chroma colors are not permitted.
G. Configuration of Materials (for primary and accessory structures)
1. Four-sided architecture shall be required so that similar architectural design elements and
details shall be consistent throughout all elevations of the structure.
a. All sides of a house shall display a high level of quality and architectural interest.
b. The majority of a building's architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted
to a single fagade.
c. Blank facades are not permitted for any detached garages or accessory structures.
d. All sides of a house should be articulated using bays, insets, balconies, porches or stoops
related to entrances and windows.
17
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
e. Watertables which extend the entire length of a side or rear elevation shall be considered
a design element for the purposes of meeting four-sided architecture requirements.
2. Changes in cladding material shall occur at logical locations, typically at interior corners
where one building mass meets another. Masonry transitions at exterior corners are
permitted with a minimum 12" material return and trim detail.
3. The number of materials utilized on prominent facades, excluding fenestration, shall not
exceed three (3) materials.
H. Architectural Elements
1. Prominent Facades
a. All street facing elevations must contain at least three design elements, in any
combination, per Dublin Zoning Code 153.190.
b. Lots 1, 9, 15, 20, 21 and 37, as indicated on the preliminary plat, present highly visible
elevations to open space areas. Elevations facing these open space areas shall contain at
least three (3) design elements, in any combination.
2. Roofs
a. Primary roof pitches shall have a minimum slope of 6:12 rise over run.
b. Secondary roofs, such as minor gables, dormers and porch pediments shall be permitted
to have minimum slope of 4:12 rise over run. When the primary roof pitch is a gable
with the pediment end oriented towards the street a less roof pitch shall be permitted.
c. Flat roofs are permitted, but must integrate strong cornice lines.
3. Chimneys
a. "Cantilevered" or "through -the -wall' chimneys are not permitted.
b. All chimneys shall be built on an integral foundation.
c. All exterior portions of chimney shall be finished masonry, consisting of brick, stone,
and/or manufactured stone.
4. Garages
a. All single-family dwellings shall have an attached or detached garage of sufficient size
to accommodate a minimum two (2) standard sized automobiles, side by side.
f:3
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
b. All garage doors shall be decorative in appearance, such as "carriage -style" doors, and
shall utilize detail features, such as decorative hinges, handles, locks, brackets and/or
windows, as appropriate to the design character of the individual home.
5. Shutters
a. Shutters shall be sized to fully cover the adjacent window.
b. Shutters that are operable or appear as such shall utilize appropriate shutter hardware (s -
clips and hinges).
c. Shutters shall be constructed of wood, vinyl, synthetic, PVC or fiber -cement and shall be
painted or have integral color.
d. Raised Panel, flat panel, louvered and board -and -batten are permitted shutter styles.
6. Front Porches
a. Front Porches, when utilized, shall be covered and open. Front porches enclosed by glass
or screen enclosures are prohibited.
XII. LANDSCAPING
A. Entry Features
1. Entry features may include integrated project signage, landscaping, and irrigation.
2. Design shall contribute to and maintain the rural character of the corridor.
3. Final location, design, and standards for entry features and related landscaping and signage
details shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase.
4. All entry features will be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association.
5. Necessary easements or reserves shall be provided on the final plat.
B. Street Trees
1. Street trees shall be installed in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. The City Forester
shall determine final type and location.
C. Private Sidewalks
1. A minimum four (4) feet wide sidewalk shall be required for every residence. This private
side walk shall extend from the front door to the driveway, where applicable, as the
driveway may abut the front door when an auto courtyard is utilized.
19
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
D. Fencing
Development Standards
1. Fences shall be prohibited on all lots, except for pool barriers and preserved perimeter
paddock fencing.
2. To create publicly accessible open space, all existing fencing located in and along perimeters
of Reserves X B, C—, -D and E shall be removed as part of the initial phase of development.
Removal of fencing shall be coordinated with city staff to ensure best practices.
3_Existing perimeter paddock fencing located on lots 1-7, 21-37 shall be preserved and
maintained in a continual state of good repair by the HOA. Maintenance plans, defining the
minimum standards for maintaining the fence in a good and workmanlike manner, shall be
presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan.
3-4. Existing perimeter paddock fencing located along the boundaries of Reserve C, west of
Mill Springs Drive and to the southern property boundary of Lot 102 in the Park Place
subdivision may remain and will be owned by the Citv of Dublin upon dedication of the
reserve by the developer. The fencing, in the condition upon dedication of the reserve be
the developer, may remain throughout its useful life and/or until determined unsafe and
inhibiting the public health and welfare as determined by the Director of Parks and
Recreation or its designee.
E. Mailboxes
1. Mailboxes shall be consistent in design and style throughout the development. A mailbox
design shall be submitted for review and approval at the final development plan phase.
F. Cul -de -Sac Islands
1. Cul-de-sac islands shall be landscaped with lawn and/or plant material. A landscape plan
shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan.
2. Any lawn and/or landscaping within an island shall be maintained by the HOA.
G. Hyland -Croy Road Landscape Treatment
1. A landscape treatment shall be installed in the setback along Hyland -Croy Road to enhance
the rural character of the corridor. Masonry piers, stone walls and/or fencing may be
included as part of this landscape treatment.
2. Plantings shall create a natural effect that is consistent with the established character of the
corridor. The treatment may consist of deciduous or evergreen trees and shrubs, ornamental
trees, perennials or any combination thereof. This effect shall be installed across the Hyland -
Croy Road frontage.
3. A sign and/or entry feature may be located within this setback. Details shall be provided for
approval as part of the Final Development Plan.
4. Pedestrian pathways, shared -use paths, water features and pond access may be provided in
this treatment.
7�7
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS
Development Standards
5. Final design and details of the landscape treatment shall be provided for approval as part of
the Final Development Plan.
21
AUTUMN ROSEWOODS Development Standards
H. Mid -Block Shared Use Path Access
1. Shared use paths that are located mid -block between lots shall be landscaped to provide a
barrier between the pathway and adjacent private yards.
2. Landscaping shall include lawn, deciduous shrubs, evergreen shrubs, deciduous trees,
evergreen trees and fencing or any combination thereof, or shall match the design where
connecting to existing paths. Design and details shall be provided and approved in the Final
Development Plan phase.
3. The final locations of shared -use paths crossings along public streets will be evaluated by the
City Engineer to minimize mid -block crossings and will be presented for approval as part of
the Final Development Plan.
XIII. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
All residential property owners located within the Autumn Rose Woods PUD shall be required to
join and maintain membership in a forced and funded homeowner's association, which will be
formed prior to any lots being sold. Homeowners association responsibilities shall be detailed within
Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions as approved by the City of Dublin before being duly
recorded in the office of the appropriate County Recorder. These Declarations of Covenants and
Restrictions shall run with the land and shall include, without limitation, the requirements imposed
upon the homeowner's association in this text.
22
'cUfRECORD OF ACTION
Dun Planning & Zoning Commission
OHIO, USA Thursday, May 17, 2018 1 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
S. PUD, Autumn Rose Woods 7540 & 7660 Hyland -Croy Road
18 -023Z -PDP -FDP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Final Development Plan
Proposal: Changes to the previously approved development text and plans to
permit the split -rail fence to remain along the perimeter of Reserve
C, to be owned by the City of Dublin.
Location: East side of Hyland -Croy Road approximately 1,200 feet south of the
intersection with Tullymore Drive.
Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a
Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan and a review and
approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning
Code Section 153.050.
Applicant: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager, City of Dublin.
Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner/Current Planning Manager.
Contact Information: 614.410.4635, chusak@dublin.oh.us
Case Information: www.dublinohiousa.gov/pzc/18-023
MOTION #1: Ms. Fox moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a
Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with no conditions.
VOTE: 5-0.
RESULT: The Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan was recommended for approval and
forwarded to City Council for final review.
RECORDED VOTES:
Victoria Newell
Yes
Stephen Stidhem
Absent
Jane Fox
Yes
Robert Miller
Yes
Warren Fishman
Yes
Kristina Kennedy
Absent
William Wilson
Yes
MOTION #2: Ms. Fox moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to approve a Final Development Plan with no
conditions.
Page 1 of 2
PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov
S. PUD, Autumn Rose Woods 7540 & 7660 Hyland -Croy Road
18 -023Z -PDP -FDP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Final Development Plan
VOTE: 5-0.
RESULT: The Final Development Plan was approved.
.1;10101.1014 BILT16) d 4-1
Victoria Newell
Yes
Stephen Stidhem
Absent
Jane Fox
Yes
Robert Miller
Yes
Warren Fishman
Yes
Kristina Kennedy
Absent
William Wilson
Yes
STAFF CERTIFICATION
Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner
Current Planning Manager
PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 17, 2018 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes
Page 12 of 14
will get out in the community and walk and understands there are not services in this immediate area but
then there is also not a connection to get all the way down the road. She remarked that as soon as the
bike shares went in, she noticed them around town so that is another reason why she likes that
connection. She said for the development of the green space, it really needs to be public and belong to
the community of Dublin and not as an amenity for a specific area/office development. She asked if staff
had considered the strip of land that is on east side of Frantz Road that is getting pulled into this area
because it is open land to still be a PUD. Mr. Papsidero said currently that land is in the township so for it
to develop, it would have to be annexed and could easily be treated as a PUD as part of that single-family
development.
Ms. Puranik said staff will take back the comments, review the document, and then figure out the next
steps.
Ms. Fox asked about the RFQ, how it was publicized, and who gets the chance to review. Rachel Ray said
she is managing the RFQ process. She said that was realized on May 7, 2018, and it was distributed to all
of the developer contacts, the local American Planning Association, ULI Columbus so they could send out
to their networks, it was shared via LinkedIn, the City's website, and all the typical channels. She said the
intent is to keep the neighborhood involved as they go through the process, likely after they get
responses, to measure how many responses were received, to record accurately to the neighborhood.
Ms. Husak asked Ms. Ray to state who was on the team to review the responses. She named Donna
Goss, Vince Papsidero, Aaron Stanford, Engineering Division, Ray Harpham, and then again, she is
managing the process.
Ms. Fox asked how many developers were on the list. Ms. Ray said ±150 contacts via email and then
there is a lot of activity on LinkedIn. Ms. Fox asked once they are reviewed, what the process is. Ms. Ray
said once the responses are received, (June 4 is the deadline), staff will have a two week internal
turnaround filling a matrix of evaluation criteria and selecting the top three finalists to submit an actual
proposed concept. At the conclusion of the RFP process, (late summer) they anticipate hosting a public
open house and the finalists would have an opportunity to present their concepts, engage with the
neighbors, and get feedback. She said staff would review the proposals and prepare a recommendation
for Council's ultimate consideration.
The Chair closed discussion.
S. PUD, Autumn Rose Woods 7540 & 7660 Hyland -Croy Road
18 -023Z -PDP -FDP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Final Development Plan
The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is a proposal for changes to the previously
approved development text and plans to permit the split -rail fence to remain along the perimeter of
Reserve C, to be owned by the City of Dublin. She said the site is on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road
approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive. She said this is a request for a
review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development
Plan and review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section
153.050.
The Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission on this case. She said a formal
presentation was not needed. She called for the first of two motions.
Motion and Vote
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 17, 2018 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes
Page 13 of 14
Ms. Fox moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a
Preliminary Development Plan with no conditions. The vote was as follows: Mr. Wilson, yes; Mr. Fishman,
yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Ms. Fox, yes. (Approved 5 - 0)
Motion and Vote
Ms. Fox moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to approve a Final Development Plan with no conditions. The vote
was as follows: Ms. Newell, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Wilson, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Ms. Fox, yes.
(Approved 5 - 0)
Claudia Husak noted the intent was to get this proposal to City Council for the meetings in June.
6. PUD, Coffman Homestead — Sign 6659 Coffman Road
18-024ARB-AFDP Amended Final Development Plan
The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is a proposal for the installation of a new sign for
the existing Historic Coffman Homestead site west of Emerald Parkway, approximately 400 feet north of
the intersection of Post Road. He said this is a request for a review and approval of an Amended Final
Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050.
The Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission on this case
JM Rayburn said
Mr. Rayburn...
Motion and Vote
Mr. Stidhem moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to approve an Amended Final Development Plan with five
conditions:
1) That the directional signs for Volvo Service, Audi Service, and Customer Parking for Land
Rover/Jaguar be revised or removed from the comprehensive sign plan and the site;
The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Ms. Kennedy, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Mr.
Stidhem, yes. (Approved 5 - 0)
ct. of Planning and Zoning Commission
Dublin May 17, 2017
OHIO, USA
18-023Z/PDP/FDP - AUTMUMN ROSE WOODS
Reviewing Board
Summary
Planning and Zoning Commission
Changes to the previously approved development text and
Site Location
plans to permit the split -rail fence to remain along the
East side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,200
perimeter of Reserve C, to be owned by the City of Dublin.
feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive.
Proposal
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Final Development Plan
Zoning
Planned Unit Development, Autumn Rose Woods
Property Owner
Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC
Applicant
Dana Mc Daniel, City Manager, City of Dublin
Representative
Matt Earman, Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Dublin
Applicable Land Use Regulations
Zoning Code Section 153.050.
Staff Recommendation
Approval to City Council by the Planning and Zoning
Commission for a Rezoning with Preliminary
Development Plan and approval to the Planning and
Zoning Commission for a Final Development Plan.
Contents
1. Context Map.................................................2
2. Overview...................................................... 3
3. Criteria Analysis............................................5
4. Recommendations........................................7
Case Manager
Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner
Current Planning Manager
(614)410-4675
chusak@dublin.oh.us
Zoning Map
Next Steps
Upon a recommendation of approval from the Planning and
Zoning Commission of the Rezoning with Preliminary
Development Plan, the legislation will be forwarded to City
Council for review and approval. The Planning and Zoning
Commission has final authority on the Final Development
Plan.
PLANNING 5800 Shier Ring Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Autumn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 2 of 7
1. Content Map
Located east of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,200 feet north of the intersection with
Tullymore Drive.
18-023Z/PDP/FDP O 250 500
Rezoning/Preli minary DP/Final DP
r..-.. —r n. A-12— PUD - Autumn Rose Woods Foo*
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Autumn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 3 of 7
2. Overview
A. Case Summary
The site is consists of two lots totaling ±47.37 acres with approximately 1,000 feet of
frontage along Hyland -Croy Road. The approved Preliminary Development Plan is for 73
single-family lots with approximately 21 acres of open space and five public streets. The
Final Development Plan is required to comply with all zoning regulations of the Planned
District, and further refine Open Space, Landscaping, Tree Replacement, Street Network,
Stormwater Management, and Utilities.
B. Background
At the March 19, 2018 City Council meeting, Council voted to direct staff to process an
application to allow the existing fence within the Autumn Woods Rose development to
remain where it was previously intended to be removed in a City -owned reserve.
On August 10, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the final development
plan and recommended approval to City Council of the final plat for the Autumn Rose
Woods subdivision. The application included all final development details.
In March 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval
to City Council for the Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat. Council
subsequently reviewed the Annexation and Rezoning/Preliminary Development and
Preliminary Plat, and Infrastructure Agreement concurrently as provided for in the Pre -
Annexation Agreement entered into by the City of Dublin and Pulte Homes of Ohio via Ord.
28-16, and approved Ordinances 25-17, 26-17, and 27-17, respectively at the May 22, 2017
meeting. With the approval Annexation and Rezoning, the site was brought within the
municipal boundary, and zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District — Autumn Rose
Woods. The Preliminary Development Plan, which includes the approved Development Text,
defines zoning standards for the development of the site. At the time of the Rezoning,
Council approved a waiver to the Tree Replacement requirement defined in the City's Zoning
Code due to the substantial preservation of nearly 16 contiguous acres of woods.
C. Site Characteristics
1) Natural Features
The site consists of two lots with approximately 1000 feet of frontage along Hyland -Croy
Road. The western portion of the site were recently used agricultural fields, a
recreational horse farm, with horse barns, paddocks and indoor arenas are on the south.
The eastern third of the site contains significant woods, which are largely preserved as
part of this proposal.
2) Historic and Cultural Facilities
There are no historic or cultural facilities present on this site.
3) Surrounding Land Use and Development Character
North: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential (Bishop's Crossing)
• East: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential (Park Place)
• South: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential (Park Place and Westbury
and Park Place Park)
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Auhrmn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 4 of
• West: Jerome Township (Glacier Ridge Metro Park and residential
homes)
4) Road, Pedestrian and Bike Network
Site work to provide infrastructure to the development is currently taking place and
temporary access for construction has been provided. The Autumn Rose Woods
development plan includes main access from Hyland -Croy Road on Johnston Drive with
connections through Barrister Drive and Mill Springs Drive south to the Park Place
subdivision, and north to Bishop's Crossing, respectively. Sidewalks and bikepaths are
included throughput the development.
5) Utilities
Utility extensions and connections have been approved as part of the Engineering
permits.
D. Neighborhood Contact
The request for this proposal originated with one resident adjacent to the northwest portion
of this site and was further delegated to staff by City Council after the receipt of a petition
of approximately 16 adjacent residents. Staff has received correspondence in support of this
request, which is included in the meeting materials.
E. Proposal
1) Fence
All reserve areas within Autumn Rose Woods are to be owned by the City of Dublin once
the developer has improved the areas in accordance with the approved plans and the
neighborhood is largely developed. A large wooded area (Reserve C) has been set aside
for passive use and will be maintained by the City of Dublin. In the approved
development text, the fence surrounding the woods was to be removed so the area is
open to the community at large for the entire community to the publicly dedicated open
space as well as to limit maintenance cost to the City.
This proposal addresses the
Autumn Rose Woods adjacent
residents' desire to retain this
fence to ensure privacy to their
lots. As the removal of the fence
was approved in the
development text, the
preliminary development plan
and the final development plan,
a new application for these
processes has been initiated by
the City of Dublin to address the
retention of the fence, as
instructed by City Council.
The proposed development text
includes language which states that the existing perimeter paddock fencing located
along the boundaries of Reserve C, west of Mill Springs Drive and to the southern
property boundary of Lot 102 in the Park Place subdivision may remain and will be
owned by the City of Dublin upon dedication of the reserve by the developer. The text
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Autumn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 5 of 7
also addresses the condition of the fencing upon dedication by the developer to the City
to eliminate obligations by the City to improve the fence condition.
The City has created an exhibit to indicate the location of fencing which may remain in
Reserve C.
3. Site Plan
4. Criteria Analysis
A. Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Analysis [§153.050]
1) The proposed development is consistent with the Dublin Zoning Code.
Criterion met. This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable
development standards of the Zoning Code requirements.
2) The proposed development is in conformance with adopted Plans.
Criterion met. The proposal is consistent with the Community Plan
recommendations.
3) The proposal advances the general welfare of the community while
maintaining orderly development.
Criterion met. This proposal is compatible and consistent with the surrounding
neighborhood and will not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding areas.
4) The proposed uses are appropriately located to safeguard the value of
adjacent property.
Criterion met. The development is appropriately located within the City and is
compatible with existing development.
5) Residential development has sufficient and adequate open space.
Criterion met. The proposal does not alter the open space provided.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Autumn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 6 of 7
6) Protection of natural features and resources.
Criterion met. The retention of the fence does not interfere with natural features or
resources.
7) Adequate facilities and infrastructure are provided to serve the
development.
Not Applicable.
8) Adequate traffic and pedestrian safety measures are provided within the
proposed development.
Not Applicable.
9) The relationship of building and site layout provides for integration with
the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin.
Not Applicable.
10) Development layout and intensity contributes to the orderly development
of land within the City.
Criterion met. This proposal meets the criterion for ensuring that the fence is
acceptable and will not hinder the orderly development of land within the city.
11) Stormwater management provisions within and through the site are
maintained.
Not Applicable.
12) The proposed development's arrangement and standards are consistent
with the community.
Criterion met. The proposal will provide for a cohesive community through the
continuation of fencing throughout the development.
13) The design and appearance of the proposal meets or exceeds the
applicable appearance standards.
Not Applicable.
14) The proposed development phasing is appropriate and sufficiently
coordinated.
Criterion met. The development will be completed in a single phase.
15) The proposal can be adequately serviced by existing or proposed public
improvements.
Not Applicable.
16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are sufficient to
service the new development.
Criterion met. No contributions to infrastructure are required as part of this proposal
B. Final Development Plan [Section 153.055(8)]
1) The proposal is consistent with the approved preliminary development
plan.
Criteria met. This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable
development standards of the Zoning Code requirements except as altered in the
proposed as part of the Preliminary Development Plan.
City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Case 18-023Z/PDP/FDP I Autumn Rose Woods
Thursday, May 17, 2017 1 Page 7 of 7
2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular
circulation within the site and adjacent property.
Not Applicable.
3) The development has adequate public services and open space.
Criteria met. The site provides adequate public open space.
4) The development preserves and is sensitive to natural characteristics of
the site while complying with applicable regulations.
Criteria met. The proposed Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved
plan.
5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe use of the site
without emitting light onto adjacent properties.
Not Applicable.
6) The proposed signs are consistent with the preliminary development plan.
Not Applicable.
7) The development has appropriate landscaping to enhance, buffer, and
soften the building and site.
Criteria met. The heavily wooded site with paddock fencing creates a sufficient
buffer between adjacent properties both within and outside the site.
8) The development is compliant with stormwater management regulations.
Not Applicable.
9) If developed in multiple phases, all phases comply with the previous
criteria.
Not Applicable.
10) The proposed development is compliant with other laws and regulations.
Criteria Met. The proposal meets all other applicable laws and regulations.
5. Recommendations
1. Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
The proposal is consistent with all of the applicable review criteria contained in the
Zoning Code and Approval is recommended.
2. Final Development Plan
The proposed Final Development Plan is consistent with all of the applicable review
criteria. Approval is recommended.
f:T3�] 1�L]�J CZd33.11Rek!
pwmw,.l n LfDbim�4g
Mar M19,2018 Ga9e9
'l tdAA - Models el no the ni
Seuae, mill woher, in
BubYa-0Rt-6eua51L
t'
COUMETIRBUNUMU R E
Lase
L Mason', 10'nt"'dw imi no
& a, r
b
Done "f In the past the peral proposed 1p� aiF d"com the 11 90' g D loth h, f
wh:at:e ""-.I
N)T CC Ras.
1. Stated that She and Ceunel members Fm, Aland and Fmerese Grmmes Alred
staff for BuSN¢s Appreciation Day last Friday, March 16. She witted IGS and Media
and was Impr¢sab wth the diversity of the businesses In NIS pommun M1y. She
appreal the opportunity to daughter; It was a great event.
2. presented a resident request for Counal members consideration. Eerier this
month, she rerelved a rettensense by resident who live ad)aSentto the wcoded
bounce roF of the nobody known as Autumn Rose Farm. A rezoning a nd tkuelopment for
that property to Puts tbmeF was a pprodec bygiand Counal lest year. The poorly
fetes apprMmaeely 97avec21 aveFofwhich will be preserved for park and open
space for the community a nd was operated N the key of Dublin. The Made ln Ing avenge
will be single faing homes. Ch the 21 bonds of park a nd open space, 16 acres doll be
pasNe parka nd. It is mature and Frosty wedged. Basted on her conversations with key
staff, there are no plans to change that composition. It will be off as a wooden a red, and
not though or reduced. AsharMure path system will be rugs lletl In the open space areas
and we pare N the wmtlen area. Most N this prepeTy has depend around land In
particular, around the perimeter of the hardly weeded area. That ence was Installed
pme time age by the bidders owner. Fewer] on atria i viemd- of the Clithas been in
iece since aForestal Sant. The landscaping sctlen of the approved final
development plan medicates that the scheme around the area that tFedral Nthe City
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
lllamu nl n nRCM4CalM MenLg
..rN1 11 n.Ft:..d...,, i,..,^„'
Mai 19, 3018 papelll
willceranaMd"g%MIOf pm)[ de mentpMn. NI16R9Mnba”
that Nether area Mme tigned a petitkn cooling Me (Mur41 recarAaar that plan ante
allow the Mi b remain last. me re4aen61Mlrate that Me fence was In place when
they, purrlasN Meir honey aM Me Acnes serves an Imwetam Ne¢tlan. It wovemes a
goad mmnslser Me removal of that teres. SUR him shared Wt Me anginal atlmale
frr Me language amended Ne WryWe n(remuAlg the fence was lwo-(nb:
(t) Towere test sensors N Me pardands 6 created for Has residents. Hnnxa,
became it is nM likely net Uis will bean appropriate aim by a me path or
vlstlng mark, that adonale, is not va116
(3) Malntenern a rant of Va Rntt. No me wants He treaty a flnantlal buNen for
Me Oty, but Me (ease is in good shape am has marry gM years shooting. It
IN MOI to mnider asyme; Me lance IndR and at Me time Mat RIs no Ismar
Mabe and had rnMN Me and of an unewl life, Me May road remove R SbF
has [mflamel that at that mann, the residents in Mk area world Now em Nallry,
W lnetap a face, If they tlimlre N do so.
If Meant members eagn, R would an Moral M ttnd a rerammmdatlon to this,
Planning am Zmag Commersom m amsa Ne Final 0. ekgment Mon.
Mr. relief somed that R IN a 1o31U1 entertainment. Ila ware In the ante work also
lamp Me tleamt Mede armays'NrkyaNsand 9arder¢Hesarm E[o senora
Me make, It is a p.Wtiveammlty b Me M9M1ba-M1OM.
Ms. Not stated Mat all N tla neighbors whose pmcedks this farm branders are In
apartment. If rebining arum Ne wMEs was d¢hN, me soman rook be HanwM.
The neighbors wcua No irmand and H making He bum is reymrtd - a Noun of Man
auk unceroke aim She agrar Met it as a good ma to leave May kite In pyre.
Mr. Reber aerate that am Ma knde has merchant that ofd orIts uttfiJ In, Me Day read
any be respmgbk for malntabing Me ne aaang It Rwasuld be removed.
Maser Pelamn stated M when at Me nes of Its naNnl low or H a Murray hoe wereb
III on It and rrea@ significant derepe to the tern- R aaUNralry, R mare as mm to
do so, He feedte would IE arcual. Itis ImpmmntN Mh that Uund IN hot m i a
Judgment Ni a fuWre access me,, If me of the nelgYboHmds should dm're dam
W Me woods. He Is sugrvtevx of IwNn3 the (ease In pace urMl mange.
Ms.>IURo rhafletl that CouMl Is not makMg a poison on Me hnce teddy, but remain
it bark to Planning am saying Dammam for NtlrnemnmeMatlan.
Mayer Norman royoMed that C rwl would the sending It hook h M wMl Has
dinersom Mat isry t Countll wand Mem b do.
Mr. Burgs ami Met Me motlm wcuN be He great staff to premre an appllm nfm
Punning and sming O mmishn amzstnRwIN the directors am a akerma s dQwdl
bright.
Mayor 0.R mum Mat it Is Imp m MM Mats provukn be teed to the zming ce Me
Me". Ahome buyer Mart of Mese M1ma would Men be a e re of Me mark
pttendal remuwl of the lance.
Mr. roggs mended that Mere woad de a Peak pnocm'raeaMg a pudk revrtd o1
wMM1asmvrred.
Y Mayor Anywhere Cameroon imam Mat else IN aim In Near of making Me lei
Ini
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Miff DU Rd OR Lau ini
He 1d March 19 2018 Page 11
Ms. me Rem moved to tlhewsteff to prepare an application with the recommendation to
menthe Final Deelopmenf Plan mrsl5fent with Caunall s tl6vusslan tonight.
Ms.. Alutta d cKnalthe motion.
Vola on the moton. Ms.. Auto, yes Ms. Fag yes Mr. Relrey y¢ Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms.
me Ro of yes; Vii Mayor Amorme Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes.
Mr. Keenan Ilpuiretl if them is any e[pece Kton for a future walkway through the wi
Mr. Pafirst responded] that them Is no shot egechaton.
M r. Reiner noted that there do sot a time r to be any easements orrlghtaf-eayfrom the
strmt to the woods that would allow the City tobuild a path dean through there.
Mayor Remponl lgulretl if the mfew ofthe oo@bnerscoultl be made miNthe remrd
for Planning and Zoning so that their m mew would remain aswtlatetl with this PRlan.
Mr. Rogge responded that their names could at minimum, he maludetl with the staff
report.
1.
fw crt
gal
Pasoan.
con c m
MSAkttm
1. Stated t at s in in joyed Bus ass App years Day. 3 in of in deep be t as to
dos a domayfiS
J Re s R. Ann us dies V 50 poup e we e arm ad Me
me 11 in Mrmymus
RECORD OF ACTION
Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission
OHIO. au Thursday, August 10, 2017.1 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission rock the plowing acton atthls mexi
3. PUD -Autumn Pore Woods 7150 Is 7270 Hyland Croy Pmtl
1]-052H[W/HP Final development Plan/Final Plat
Proposal'. The subdmeon and development of 47 acres for 73 singe family Tots
and 21 acres of open space, and pubic rights of way
Lceadon Eastside of HylandCroy Road a[pmHmately 1,200 feet strut of the
IntenpNon with Thlymore Drive.
Request Remew, and approval of a Final Eevelopment Plan under the promsione of
Code Senon 153.050, and reNew and recommendaton of approval to
Oty Crundl for a Hrel Plat under the pomsions of the S ddirmsion
Regdatm
Applicant MaPCd1ahaq Pul@Homes.
Planning Contact Mance M. Mahn, Planner 1.
Contact mformaton (614) 430F4635, nmarbn@Mubl n. on us
Case l nformaton'. bmr.ffdietmrousa. mNozc/17-062
MOTION: Mr. Miller moved, As. Cady mronded, to approve the Final Eevelopment Plan because It
cenls4ntwith all of the aWlllable remew, criteria, wit fou cenditon'.
1) Theafpllantremove all hazardous trees and Invasive spedes from Reserve Cwitlrin Proximityof
private property and the proposed {etiv
2) That the plans Fe updeted to Include a mile that ensures use of censtrhot on details trot Promote
trees Preserveton techniques In the field htm and censtructon of the shared use path,
3) The appiant work with the Otys Landscape Inpector to make appropriate shrub selectors
along the southwest side of the srormwafer basin, and
4) The developer request lrs�pectm of to tree protenon fendng by the Otys Landi inspector
prior to the removal of any trees to ensure preserved trees will not i mpacted.
"iAl calldron agreed to tre above cendlton.
VOTE: 4-0.
RESULT: oris Final Eevelcpment%an was approved
RECORDED VOTES:
Victoria Newell
Absent
Amy Cady
yes
Chris Brown
yes
Canny ceNowa
yes
Robert Miller
yes
Ee ahMitchell
Absent
Slepren Stdfem
Absent
Page lof2
PLANNING 5800 Sher Nrgs Pmtl Dakin, CHF 4306 [tore 514.410A®o fax 51441.4141 dublinobiouce.gw
City 6r RECORD OF ACTION
vablin Planning & Zoning Commission
oaP. USA Thursday, August 10, 2017 6:30 pm
The Panning and Zoning arnmisslon Wok the Wllmvlrg action at this m xerl
3. PUD—Autumn Ram Woods 215062270 Hyland! Cmy Road
17-0 21IDP/FP Flnal Development Plan/Final Part
MOTIOM N2: Mr. Miller moved, MS. Salary sxaged, W approve this Final Pat bemuse It Is mnsWent
SAM the Subdivision Regulations, Mh one mndRon:
1) That the apgkart ensure that am minor teoo l adjustment W We Pat are made prior W City
Cuundl submittal.
All Calahan agreed W the above mMaon.
VOTE: 4-0.
RESULT: Thai Final Fiat will be Wrvlarred W CRY Council MM a RCommtldadon or appR21
RECORDED VOTES:
Vkloda ""if
Absent
Amy Saay
Yes
Obis Brown
yes
Cabby Ce Rosa
yes
Robert Miller
yes
Deborah Modell
Absent
Stephen Stichem
Absent
STAFF CEMR(A IOH
N�nV�
H Matl
PamrI
n
Page2 a2
PLANNING Sana 9AC ogs RW Dublin, Cho 43016 phone 616.110.1600 hr 619410970 duHlMYousaflov
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 19 of 31
u
u
u
u
22
u
u _ ...
-. a
■_ ..
_ ... _.
,. _ .-
_...
..,
_ _
� _ _
__
__
u
u
u
u ■-
uM..
_ _
u
■-
u
u
u
u
3. PUD —Autumn Rose Woods 7150 & 7270 Hyland -Croy Road
17-O62FDP/FP Final Development Plan/Final Plat
The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, said the following application is for the subdivision and development on 47
acres for 73 single-family lots, 21 acres of open space, and public rights-of-way. He said the site is on the
east side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive.
He said this is a request for a review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of
Zoning Code Section 153.050, and a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Final
Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations.
The Vice Chair swore in anyone intending on addressing the Commission in regard to this case.
Nichole Martin went through the background and reviewed the process.
Ms. Martin presented the Final Development Plan and explained it would be completed in two phases.
The first phase, she said, is for 37 lots as well as utilities to extend into the second phase but completed
with phase one, and for Reserves A and B. She said phase two is for 36 lots and for Reserves C — F,
which she noted on the screen.
Ms. Martin said staff relies on the Final Development Plan to provide final details for Open Space,
Landscaping, and Stormwater Management. She said all of the reserves will be owned by the City of
Dublin, however, Reserves A and B will maintained by the HOA as well as Reserve F. She presented the
Open Space and Landscaping plan that contains the entry feature with incorporated sign.
Ms. Martin said the applicant has proposed a formal entry feature at the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road
and Johnston Drive. She said they are proposing limestone piers with modest entry feature signs with the
text "Autumn Rose Woods" in a calligraphy font and accented with a split -rail fence, which will consist of
unfinished pressure treated wood to enhance the rural roadway character.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 20 of 31
Ms. Martin said Reserve C represents 16 acres of contiguous woods that are preserved as part of this
application. She said the existing split -rail fence around the entire perimeter of that open space was
approved to be removed with the Rezoning. She pointed out that Reserve C will be publically accessible
to all of the residents of Dublin and also include a future field located shared -use path to connect from
the neighborhood to the south through Reserve D and Reserve C and terminating at Park Place Park.
Ms. Martin said final details are also included for the stormwater basin, which the function will be
managed by the City. She reported the applicant has worked with staff to refine the edges and soften the
landscaping, specifically across the back of homes to provide a buffer. She noted one of the conditions is
that the shrubs be determined in coordination with the City Landscape Inspector. The northeast side, she
said, will be a "No Mow" area to minimize costs of maintenance and to transition to the more naturalized
landscape.
Ms. Martin stated Reserve E is a wetland that is proposed to be maintained as -is and maintained by the
City. Reserve F, she noted, represents a landscape treatment in the terminus of the Oliver Way cul-de-
sac bulb.
Ms. Martin said the Final Development Plan is the point in the application where staff requires additional
details to be provided on preservation protection and replacement of trees and presented an exhibit. She
indicated the Developer has made a significant effort to meet the City's Conservation Design Resolution
Principles so many trees were preserved; however, a number of sizeable trees will be removed with the
construction of Oliver Way cul-de-sac. She reported a Tree Waiver was granted as part of the Rezoning
request by City Council. She stated that Tree Waiver permits trees to be replaced per Code with the
exception that trees 6 — 24 caliper inches will be replaced tree -for -tree and landmark trees will be
replaced inch -for -inch. The applicant is required to replace 668.5 inches but the site will only
accommodate 500 inches; therefore, the remainder will be paid as a Fee -in -Lieu of $16,100 to the City of
Dublin Parks and Recreation Department.
Ms. Martin presented the Road, Pedestrian, and Bike Network plan. She noted these are identical to what
was reviewed at the Preliminary Development Plan stage with the exception of that additional shared
path to be extended along Johnston Drive.
Ms. Martin reported that Engineering has reviewed the proposed Utility Plan, which she presented. She
explained a 12 -inch water line will be extended along Hyland -Croy Road and the existing home will be
brought onto City water and sewer as part of phase one of this development.
Ms. Martin said the Final Plat is the final step in delineating lot requirements. She presented the proposed
Final Plat and said the lots are consistent with what was shown in the Preliminary Plat. She noted the plat
delineates open spaces, dedicates public right-of-ways, delineates building lines, and delineates tree
preservation zones.
Ms. Martin reported that part of staffs review of this application has found that the criteria for a Final
Development Plan are met with the four conditions as presented.
With respect to the Final Plat, Ms. Martin said this is also met but with one condition that any minor
technical adjustments be made prior to City Council review.
Ms. Martin stated the Final Development Plan is recommended for approval for a determination by this
body and the Final Plat is a recommendation of approval to City Council.
The Vice Chair invited the applicant to speak
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 21 of 31
Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes, 4900 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, Dublin, said he is joined this evening by
Greg Chilog with the Edge Group. He said this has been a 2.5 year process starting with a Concept
Review before the Commission. He offered to answer any questions.
Cathy De Rosa said the Commission did not receive any architectural pictures or drawings - just
information provided in the Development Text and it was pretty vanilla. She said one of the goals is to
make sure this proposal fits within the character of the surrounding area. She said she is struggling with
how the Commission is going to know that.
Ms. Martin said single-family architecture is not a requirement so applicants in some cases choose to offer
it; from a staff perspective, they have had a lot of challenges in administering plans when architecture is
shown. Therefore, she said they suggest that the Preliminary Development Plan or the Development Text
be substantially descriptive in order to stand in place of pictures because it is ultimately regulatory. She
said they work with the applicant at the Preliminary Development Plan phase to ensure that they were
being sensitive to the most visible lots, especially those with frontage along Hyland -Croy Road so those
lots have additional standards as well as specific prohibited materials. Furthermore, she said the building
permits will be reviewed against the Appearance Code. She said this issue was raised at City Council and
architecture was shared with Council as part of the rezoning.
Bob Miller asked if the Commission had seen any architectural drawings.
Mr. Callahan said he did not recall presenting elevations to the Commission but when requested at City
Council, he passed out some elevations and renderings. He said the homes in this series/collection are
fairly new. He said the designs shared with Council were somewhat preliminary but have since been
refined. He said the standards in the text are the same used for several neighborhoods in Dublin in
recent years such as Riviera, Celtic Crossing, and Wellington Reserve. He added they are well aware of
the architectural standards of Dublin Appearance Code and there are additional regulations in the text for
the lots that face Hyland -Croy Road and those adjacent to open spaces. He said they added features like
decorative garage doors and things of that nature. He indicated the appearance will be consistent with a
lot of newer neighborhoods being developed.
The Vice Chair invited the public to speak.
Sandy Hite, 7505 Hyland -Croy Road, Plain City, said she lives right across from the existing horse farm
and have been there for 11 years. She added their three children go to Dublin Schools and with the
windows open they can hear the horses whinny. She said she cannot talk the owners into not selling their
property. She asked if Dublin has a plan for Hyland -Croy Road. She stated it is a nightmare coming up
and down this single, lane road, especially at peak hours. She said if another 73 houses are added, which
could bring 150 more cars, we need to plan responsibly. She suggested the infrastructure be handled
prior to the development of this proposal.
Mr. Brown said some things are in the Commission's purview and some things are not.
Amy Salay said that roadway is not Dublin's and the traffic generated from this development is going to
be minimal compared to the 300+ multi -family homes that Jerome Township has approved. She noted
the City of Dublin cannot take responsibility for the road when all that development is happening outside
of Dublin's limits. She said the challenges going forward are at present the responsibility of Union
County. She recalled the City did a Hyland -Croy Road character study a few years ago to design a
beautiful area but implementation in not in the foreseeable future.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 22 of 31
Ms. Hite said even though she has a Plain City address, she has been in Dublin approximately 19 years
on and off and she considers herself a Dublinite. She said when someone buys a Dublin home here and
pays Dublin taxes, and yet the main thoroughfare coming in and out of their development is on Hyland -
Croy Road she thought Dublin would be responsible.
Ms. Martin said, as part of this application, an Infrastructure Agreement was approved by City Council on
May 22, 2017, which detailed how the developer will contribute to off-site improvements and a number of
those improvements are within Union County. She said the City will work with Union County to get those
funds allocated to specific intersections that were identified in the Traffic Impact Study, which was
required as part of the rezoning. Specifically out in front of the site, she noted there will be a right-hand
turn lane and a left-hand turn lane built with the construction of phase one of this development.
Ms. Hite said she found out through this whole process that apparently she actually owns half of Hyland -
Croy land underneath the road and wonders what rights she has to that piece of land that now 150 more
cars are going to go over 10 times a day.
Mr. Brown said it is a right-of-way so every property almost always has utilities there. He understands her
frustration with the City but they always try to get cooperation with Jerome Township.
Ms. De Rosa clarified the turn lanes discussed will be implemented with phase one. Ms. Martin answered
the turn lanes are with phase one but there is no timeline associated with the implementation of the
other off-site contributions/improvements.
Michael Hendershot clarified that in the Traffic Impact Study there were three intersections where they
were about monetary contributions that would be made. For Hyland -Croy and Post Roads, he said, the
contribution was made with the recording of the first phasing of the Plat and the other two intersections
are due with the recording of the second Plat. Therefore, he said, there is timing associated with the
monetary contributions.
Andrew Hite, 7505 Hyland -Croy Road, said it is not Dublin's road, however, for the traffic evaluation, the
City did a mock up of turn lanes to which Mr. Brown confirmed. Mr. Hite said he now understands he has
to go to Jerome Township with concerns but asked what information he can gain from the Traffic Impact
Study that Dublin conducted.
Ms. Salay suggested our engineers provide Mr. Hite with information of which there is a significant
amount.
Mr. Hendershot said the City of Dublin worked with Union County because they are the owners of the
roadways so they have reviewed it and are in agreement with the outcome of the Traffic Impact Study.
Ms. Salay added there is a ton of information available to the public. Mr. Papsidero indicated that
additionally, there should have been a traffic study conducted for the Jacquemin Farms development
proposal but he is not certain if it had been completed and that would be under the County Engineers
purview in Union County.
The Vice Chair called for any final comments. [Hearing none.] He called for a motion for the Final
Development Plan followed by a motion for the Final Plat. He asked the applicant is he was in agreement
with the four conditions as presented. Matt Callahan agreed.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 23 of 31
Motion and Vote
Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to approve the Final Development Plan with four conditions:
1) That the applicant remove all hazardous trees and invasive species from Reserve C within
proximity of private property and the proposed path;
2) That the plans be updated to include a note that ensures the use of construction details that
promote tree preservation techniques in the field location and construction of the shared use
path;
3) That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Inspector to make appropriate shrub selections
along the southwest side of the stormwater basin; and
4) That the developer request inspection of the tree protection fencing by the City's Landscape
Inspector, prior to the removal of any trees to ensure preserved trees will not be impacted.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; and Mr. Miller, yes.
(Approved 4 — 0)
Motion and Vote
Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Final Plat with the
following condition:
1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City
Council submittal.
The Vice Chair asked the applicant if he was in agreement with that one condition to which he answered
affirmatively.
The vote was as follows: Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; and Mr. Miller, yes.
(Recommended for Approval 4 — 0)
4.
- -
111 Ir 111ph
01 lllml�n��
.
rH
■. .. . .. ....
.. .... .
.
.. ... . .- ■
.-. .- .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 6 of 19
The Clerk read the titles of Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 and 28-17 Into the record
Ordinance 26-17
Accepting the Annexation of 47.366 Acres from Jerome Township, Union
County to the City of Dublin. (Agent: Tom Hart, Attomey/Agent for Petitioners,
Johnston H. Means, R. Oliver Grithth and Deborah L. Griffith)
Ordinance 27-17
Rezoning Approximately 47 Acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District for the Development of the Site with 73 Single-family
Lots and Approximately 21 Acres of Open Space on the East Side of Hyland -
Croy Road, North of the Intersection with Park Mill Drive Under the Provisions
of Zoning Code Section 153.050; and a Preliminary Plat for 73 Single-family
lots, Rights-of-way, and Open Space in Accordance with Chapter 152, the
Subdivision Regulations. (Cam #16-086Z/PDP/PP)
Ordinance 28-17
Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into an Infrastructure Agreement with
Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC for the Autumn Rose Woods Development
Ms. Martin stated that Council has before them three ordinances related to the proposed
Autumn Rose Woods development. This presentation will be provided Jointly by the Law
Director's office, the City Engineer and the Planning division. She will present the first
two ordinances, and Mr. Hammersmith, City Engineer, will present the Infrastructure
Agreement.
Ordinance 26 -17 -Annexation:
This site is located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road with approximately 1,000 feet
of frontage. It is comprised of two parcels, both currently located within Jerome
Township in Union County. The southern parcel is the existing Autumn Rose horse fans
with single-family residences as well as paddocks. The site to the north contains a single-
family residence, which is proposed to remain with this development.
The annexation request is for 47.366 acres. This includes no public rights-of-way. The
City entered into a pre -annexation agreement with Pulte Homes with Ordinance 28-16,
which provided for the concurrent review of the annexation as well as the rezoning and
preliminary development plan, which are before Council for review tonight. The
infrastructure component has been Included with these, as well.
Ordinance 27-17 — Rezonlno and Preliminary Development Plan:
The Community Plan identifies land use recommendations for sites within the City. This
site is designated Mixed Residential Rural Transition and recommends single-family
homes on smaller lots at a density of 1.5 dwelling units (DU) per acre. The proposal is
consistent with that at 1.54 DU/acre, and that is with the Intent of preserving the natural
areas on the site. Additionally, the Thoroughfare Plan Identifies recommended right-of-
way widths. The City Engineer has worked with the Union County Engineer, as Hyland -
Croy Road is not currently within the municipal boundaries of the City of Dublin, and the
applicant has provided adequate right-of-way dedication to fulfill the future vision for the
Hyland -Croy Road corridor.
Mr. Lecklider asked for confirmation that no right-of-way is included with this annexation
request.
Ms. Martin responded that is correct. The annexation is only for the two parcels that
compromise the 47,366 acre site.
Mr. Lecklider requested additional Information.
Ms. Readier stated that the Improvements to the Hyland -Croy Road that are required as
part of the development are addressed In the Infrastructure Agreement which provides
for Union County, the City of Dublin and the developer to provide the tum -Ins that are
required and some of the offate contributions, which Puhe Homes will be required to
make. The annexation petition Itself is only for the parcel up to the right-of-way line.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 7 of 19
Mr. Lecklider asked if it is through another mechanism that the needed right-of-way will
be obtained to widen the road to four lanes In the future.
Ms. Readier confirmed that is correct. The agreement includes provisions for right-of-
way dedication, either the City of Dublin or Union County, as applicable when the rights-
of-way are needed.
Mr. Keenan inquired If the rights-of-way would be provided at no cost.
Ms. Readier responded that is correct.
Vice Mayor Reiner Inquired if it would also include the corridor setback that has already
been established on that roadway.
Ms. Readier responded that is correct.
Vice Mayor Reiner Inquired if there is sufficient allowance for four lanes, the center
median and the desired setback.
Ms. Martin responded that is correct. The development text requirements fulfill the rural
roadway character designation that the Community Plan identifies for Hyland -Croy Road,
which is a variable setback of 100 — 200 feet. In this development, it will be 150 feet.
The Community Plan also identifies Special Area Plans for sensitive sites within the City.
These are simply conceptual depictions of how development could occur. The proposal
before Council is fairly consistent with the Area Plan's vision for this site in that It does
preserve a significant amount of woods, provides the required setback along Hyland -Croy
Road, and also provides single-family residences adjacent to existing single-family
residences.
Proposed Preliminary Development Plan:
• This plan provides for 73 single-family lots, Including 72 new lots as well as the
preservation of one existing home on the 73- lot.
• The site will develop in two sections, with 37 lots in Phase 1 and 36 lots in Phase
2. Additionally, stub streets will be connected to the north and south, as well as
five public streets created.
• There will be 21 acres of open space across six reserves; 16 of those acres will be
contiguous with Reserve C and the woods.
• The proposed uses and development standards are consistent with recently
approved single-family subdivisions throughout Dublin, which permit parks, open
spaces, homes and also the uses within the R-1 section of the Zoning Code.
• The applicant has also provided 21.3 acres of open space, all to be dedicated to
the City of Dublin.
• Reserves A, B and F will be maintained by the homeowners association and will
contain landscaping features, entry features, as well as bikepaths. Reserves C, D
and E will be maintained by the City. These will contain natural features, wetlands
and stormwater management facilities.
Proposed PrellminaryPlat:
• The proposed preliminary plat is included and delineates lines that are described
within the development text.
The Manning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application on March 2 and
recommended Council approval with seven conditions, as listed. The applicant has
worked with staff to fulfill all the conditions. They have fulfilled the conditions of the
preliminary plat as well.
Ordinance 26-17 - Infrastructure Aareement:
Mr. Hammersmith stated that the execution of an Infrastructure agreement is a Condition
of Approval recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission for the rezoning and
the preliminary development plan. The most critical component of the infrastructure
agreement is the traffic Impact study, which establishes and determines the Impacts to
the associated transportation network adjacent to the site. It also determines the
mitigating measures for those Impacts.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 8 of 19
TOMO Study.'
The developer, Pulte Homes, commissioned the baffic impact study, which was
completed in May 2016 and recently updated in February 2017. The study looked at the
impacts over a 10 -year period, 2016 to 2026 -- the horizon years -- and determined that:
• The developer would be required to construct at 100% of the cost a southbound,
left -turn lane Into the site on Hyland Croy Road and a northbound, right -tum lane
on Hyland -Croy Into the site.
• Further onsite contributions would be necessary at three critical Intersections:
Hyland -Croy and Brand Road, where there is an existing roundabout; Hyland -Croy
Road and Park Mill Drive, where future intersection control will be needed; and
further to the south, Hyland -Croy Road and Post Road. That traffic Impact study
looked at the contributing traffic to those intersections, then an estimate was
made of the future Improvements that would be necessary to mitigate the traffic
impact at those intersections.
• The cast estimates for the three Intersection improvements, the amount of
anticipated traffic contribution to that site and the developers corresponding
contribution are:
Hyland -Croy Road and Park Mill Drive - $1,000,000; contributed traffic -3%-
$30,000 (prior to recording of final plat for second phase or 12/31/25,
whichever is earlier)
Hyland -Croy Road and Post Road - $2,500,000; contributed traffic— 1.7%-
$42,500 (prior to recording of final plat for first phase)
Hyland -Goy Road and Brand Road/Mitchell-DeWitt Road - $500,000;
contributed traffic — 1.7%- $8,500 (prior to recording of final plat for second
phase or 12/31/25, whichever Is earlier)
Total costs = tal developer contributions $81,000
(approximately 2.13%)
He noted that the Hyland -Croy, Brand and Mitchell -DeWitt roundabout was constructed
several years ago to be expandable, should it became necessary. The Improvements will
be made in two phases as the project develops. The first phase will be 37 homes; the
second phase will he 36 homes.
Jurisdictional Boundaries:
Another important component of the infrastructure agreement addresses the
jurisdictional boundaries and who presently controls the Intersections. The Intersections
at Hyland -Croy, Park Mill Drive and Post Road are currently controlled by the Union
County Engineer's Office. Therefore, those contributions will be paid to Union County. If
those intersections should be annexed into the City in the future, those contributions
would then be paid to Dublin.
The infrastructure agreement is consistent with the findings of the traffic impact study
and has been mutually agreed upon by the City of Dublin and Union County Engineer.
Staff recommends approval of the Infrastructure agreement.
Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if the developer would pay for the shared -use path.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that any of the shared -use paths, along both the frontage
of Hyland -Croy Road and the connector to Park Place, would be the responsibility of the
developer.
Mr. (.ecklider Inquired about the homeowners association's responsibility to maintain
Reserve A, the cul-de-sac and a third reserve. He believes the City has a formula that
determines whether the maintenance responsibility would create too great a burden for
the homeowners. In the past, some neighborhoods have been unable to sustain the
open space at a reasonable cost. Was that formula applied in this case?
Ms. Martin responded that the burden an the homeowners association (HOA) was taken
Into consideration. In the past, this land has always been dedicated to the City, so the
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 9 of 19
City will cover the tax burden of that property. Typically, the frontage where a private
landscape feature or entry feature would be located is maintained by the HOA. Since the
stormwater management is not in that area, staff believes the HOA will be financially
able to maintain that area.
Mr. Lecklider inquired if staff believes it is a reasonable burden, although shared by only
72 units. It is a significant open space In this location.
Ms. Martin acknowledged that Is true.
Mr. Lacklider stated that to the south of this site, the Post Preserve and Park Place
original landscaping plan Included many trees. A significant number have needed to be
replaced, which the City has subsidized through Its Beautify Your Neighborhood grant
program. The City does not want to make that mistake again.
Ms. Martin responded that staff has spoken with the developer about that. Actually, there
has been a change in the thinking. Many of the treatments along Hyland -Croy Road
were a product of the "Road to Wow" plan. They were formalized bosque treatments.
Unfortunately, they did not thrive in that more naturalized rural corridor, so the
neighborhoods to the north and south have transitioned or are transitioning toward a
more rural character. That is the direction that staff has given the applicant, which will
be finalized with the Final Development Man.
Mr. Leckilder stated that with respect to that particular reserve, he hopes that a fence
will not be included. In his experience, fences never are a long-term solution. One
example is the fence along Brand Road, which had slats missing for a considerable
amount of time. They have been replaced but remain unpainted. Even fences made of
synthetic material do not hold up well over time.
Ms. Martin responded that, with respect to the entry feature, she would defer to the
applicant The only fences that are proposed as part of this application are fences that
already exist, and those will only be maintained between abutting single-family
residential lots.
Mr. Lecklider Inquired if language is induced to address when the maintenance
responsibility shifts to the HOA. In the early years, the HOA cannot bear that burden, so
there should be language specifying that the responsibility does not transfer to the HOA
until a certain number of the units are sold. He requested the applicant to address that
point in his presentation.
Ms. Martin noted that prior to Mr. Hart's presentation, she will summarize the
recommended Council actions. Staff recommends approval of the three ordinances
before Council. As staff has worked through the infrastructure agreement with the
applicant, it has become apparent that the discussion about tree preservation and a
waiver of some of the requirements should occur concurrent with the requests for
annexation, rezoning and infrastructure agreement. Because Ms. Husak is currently
working on an update of the City's tree waiver policy, she will address that
recommendation.
Ms. Husak stated that staff has been working on an update to the tree waiver policy, but
the timing of this project precedes completion of that policy. At their last meeting, PZC
reviewed a draft of the revised policy, and staff hopes to have a final draft of that policy
prepared for consideration at the June 12 Council meeting. In the meantime, the
applicant has requested a waiver from the current policy's tree replacement fees.
Therefore, staff requests that Council also Include this consideration in their review of the
preliminary development plan. This would be included in the development text.
The shaded area [slide shown] depicts the wooded area that the applicant proposes to
preserve. Approximately 10 percent of the wooded area is being removed to
accommodate the cul de sac and the lots that are proposed within that roadway. The
trees designated within the darker shaded area are landmark trees proposed for removal.
Landmark trees are trees that are healthy or in fair condition and 24 inches or greater in
diameter. Non -landmark trees are any healthy or fair condition trees that are six to 24
Inches in diameter.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 10 of 19
For this proposal:
173 non -landmark trees equaling 1,910 Inches in diameter are proposed for
removal; and
Six landmark trees equaling 169 Inches are proposed for removal;
The Code requires that these be replaced inch for Inch. Therefore, the applicant
would be required to replace a total of 2,079 Inches, which means 832 2% -Inch
diameter trees. The cost would be $207,900.
Due to the open spaces being provided, and recognizing Council's concern about
the maintenance of open spaces by HOAs, it is not reasonable to require the
applicant to replace 832 trees on the site. If the applicant were to choose to pay
a fee in lieu of the replacement of those Inches, the fee would be $207,900.
Typically, Council has allowed non -landmark trees to be replaced tree for tree, as
opposed to inch for Inch. In this case, the applicant would be allowed to replace
241 trees of 2.5 Inches in diameter each.
The project has not reached the final development plan stage, but at the current
stage, the applicant is pmposing to replace half of the required inches with trees,
which would be 301 Inches or 121 trees across all the reserves within the
development.
They would pay a fee in lieu of for the remainder of the trees or $30,000. Without
the waiver, the required fee in lieu of would be $177,750.
- A significant amount of the woodlands on the site will be preserved, saving 95
percent of the landmark trees, removing only five percent. Significant efforts have
been made for preservation. It also Is not wise to replant the site so heavily that
it cannot be maintained by the City or the HOA.
- Therefore, staff recommends that two conditions be added to the existing seven
recommended conditions:
8. That the development text be modified to permit tree -for -tree replacement
non -landmark trees with a minimum of 301.5 inches to be replaced on-site;
9. That the applicant work with staff to ensure that any additional inches
provided are appropriately looted on the site to ensure the long-term
survival of replacement trees.
Staff and the applicant are available to respond to any questions.
Mayor Peterson noted that this rezoning Is being considered concurrently with the
annexation acceptance. Given the land is still within Jerome Township, is there anything
that would prevent the applicant from cutting down whatever trees desired at this point?
Ms. Claudia responded that there is not, aside from political will.
Mr. Lecklider stated that six landmark trees in the cul de sac are proposed for removal.
In general, where are the 173 non -landmark trees located?
Ms. Husak responded that those are in the woods where the stormwater management
pond has to be accommodated; the others would be in the cul de sac. These trees are of
substantial size, but are not of landmark size.
Mr, Lecklider asked for confirmation that no trees would be removed along the fencerow,
but only to the north or south.
Ms. Husak responded that area is Intended to be preserved. The applicant has been
requested to move utilities south toward the lots to ensure the survival of the fencerow
trees.
Mr. Lecklider noted that the existing homeowners will likely be concerned with the
preservation of the trees along the fencerow. He Inquired if the developer has met with
the neighborhood residents.
Ms. Husak responded affirmatively. Planning, Engineering, and Parks and Rec staff
walked the site with the applicant, as well, to verify the survey and where trees should
be preserved.
Mr. Keenan asked about the timing of Council's consideration of a revised tree waiver
policy.
Ms. Husak responded that the intent is to provide this to Council for consideration at
their next meeting on June 12.
Minutes
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 11 of 19
Ms. Alutto noted that the developer Is dedicating more than 35 percent of the property to
open space, which is significantly greater than what is provided in other developments.
Ms. Husak responded that it is more than the Code requirement, but there have been a
few recent developments with dedications of 40 plus percent.
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that this is a woods with many large, beautiful trees, and it
is worth preserving to the greatest extent possible due to the quality of the plant
material contained therein.
Mayor Peterson invited the applicant's representative to present.
Thomas L. Hart, Isaac Wiles, 2 Miranova Place. Columbus stated that with him tonight
are Matt Callahan of Pulte Homes and Greg Chillog, landscape architect with The Edge
Group.
• There were two neighborhood meetings and two Planning and Zoning
Commission hearings, one of which was an early concept plan hearing. They also
received Council member input, which was incorporated into this plan.
• They believe the proposed plan balances the surging market demand for empty
nester housing In Dublin along with Dublin's high development standards. The
plan meets the Code; Dublin's architectural standards; and complies with the
Community Plan in terms of density, woods preservation, multi -use path
connections, open space requirements, and the required large setbacks along
Hyland -Croy Road. They endeavored to respect the Community Plan and Future
Land Use Plan with the significant preservation on the site.
• They listened to the neighborhood's concems and came up with the least
impactful plan. A key moment in this process was when they made the decision
to try to structure the site as an empty nester product, which the neighborhood
strongly supported.
• They will be providing 72 single-family, primarily first -floor living homes— large,
ranch patio -style homes. They will have master bedrooms on the first floor;
many with a second bedroom downstairs; the units are designed to have some
flexible finished space on the second floor, but limited to only 50% of the first
floor area.
• The site will actually have 45 percent open space — 21 acres.
• In regard to the tree waiver request: they will be preserving 90 percent of the
woods overall —16.6 of the 18.5 acres. They will be providing a significant public
benefit in protecting 16+ acres of very mature woods and also allowing access to
those woods for the first time. Through their meetings, the neighbors recognized
that their plan is essentially guaranteeing the preservation of the woods for their
use for the first time. They do not have that use and that guarantee today, and
this helped to gamer their support. The bottom line, though, is that when that
much acreage is set aside on a development site and given the amount of
setback off Hyland -Croy Road, the development envelope on this site Is very
compact. Application of the Code requirements as they read would result in a
situation where, due to the amount of fee in lieu of, they could not create this
quality development In addition to the desired regional road Improvements.
• He appreciates that Engineering staff worked with them on the Infrastructure
agreement to provide them some flexibility in terns of when the regional
Improvement fees are due and when they must make their improvements. This
site will not have the same traffic impact as a traditional, single-family housing
development with many trips per household. However, the traffic along this
corridor will Increase and they will be contributing per the findings of their traffic
study.
• The combination of those factors led them to request the tree waiver at the time
of the rezoning. They are unable to determine the feasibility of this development
without knowing what level of waiver would be supported.
Mayor Peterson asked if approval of those additional conditions would be part of the
Ordinance 27-17 approval.
Ms. Readier responded affirmatively.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 12 of 19
Mayor Peterson inquired if the developer is agreeable to the addition of those two
conditions to the rezoning.
Mr. Hart indicated that he would be agreeable.
Mr. Lecklider stated that he would prefer not to have fencing included In the entryway.
He would prefer stone or brick something other than a fence that would become a
burden on the HOA to maintain. He would like something that is more sustainable long
term.
Mr. Hart stated that he assumes he is referencing the entry along Hyland -Goy.
Mr. Lecklider responded affn iatively.
Mr. Hart stated that they had not planned for that, but will definitely consider it with the
final details.
Mr. Lecklider stated that he has made this comment a number of times previously,
although he Is not certain of the extent to which that has been supported by staff.
Mr. Hart responded that staff has informed them that traditional landscaping used by
other developments in their entryways In this area was unable to stand up to the wind
and weather. They will attempt to provide something that is more natural to the prairie
environment, which will be low impact and low maintenance.
Mr. Lecklider stated that he was a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission at
the time the "Road to Wow" attempt was made. Everyone's Intentions were good, but he
believes the City learned from this experience.
Mr. Lecklider asked if any elevations have been presented to staff.
Ms. Martin responded that elevations were provided to staff as a concept of their product
type; however, elevations are not required with a rezoning or preliminary development
plan. Only the materials were designated in the text.
Mr. Lecklider asked at what point staff or PZC would see elevations.
Ms. Martin responded that elevations would be reviewed at building permitting. They are
not required in a planned unit development for single-family residential. They would be
required for a condominium product.
Mr. Lecklider asked if there would therefore not be any review of the elevations.
Ms. Martin responded that elevations would be reviewed against the development text at
permitting and must meet the Appearance Code as well as the additional standards that
are provided in the text. There will be no Individual review of each elevation.
Mr. Lecklider stated that he, and likely all of Council, would have a fairly high expectation
for these elevations. What was shown at the conceptual level did not meet his
expectations, although there may have been other Iterations since that time.
Mr. Hart stated that he believes that what they showed is what the company Is building
for the first time in this market.
Mr. Lecklider stated that he recalls seeing an example of something built in Indiana and
other markets.
Matt la an, Pulte Egme& 42QU Juttle Crossing eoulev rd Dublin stated that the
elevations would be very consistent with the character and design of other newer
communities. He has a sample set of elevations with him that he will share this evening.
Mr. Lecklider Inquired if this is a new design, unique to Dublin.
Mr. Callahan responded that it Is a new series of homes for the company. They are
offering something similar in Indianapolis, in the Carmel and Westfield communities.
What will be offered In Dublin will be a style very similar to the renderings and photos in
the packet that he has shared.
Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if their past projects with this style of homes became senior -
dominated projects.
Mr. Callahan responded affirmatively. These homes are designed pdmaHly for seniors
who are ready to downsize, but not yet ready for condominium living. These homes
cater to buyers seeking first -floor living options.
Vice Mayor Reiner inquired what percentage of these homes would have three -car
garages.
Mr. Callahan responded that thme-car garages are available for all the homes; it is the
buyer's choice. There Is space for a three -car garage on every lot.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 13 of 19
Vice Mayor Reiner stated that he and Mr. Lecklider may respectfully disagree on the
fencing issue, particularly If The Edge Group considers a fence to be a defining feature
for this subdivision. His HOA has been installing more fences — probably about two or
three miles of fencing, They are an interesting way to demark a special area. If it is
considered an important aesthetic element for this project, he does not object. He does
not have an Issue with fencing, provided the homeowners maintain It.
Mr. Keenan inquired about the price point of these homes.
Mr. Callahan responded that they anticipate the homes to average around $500,000.
Mr. Lecklider inquired if the three -car garages would be subject to regulations, as only a
certain percentage of the front elevation can be comprised of garage.
Ms. Martin responded that is correct, as the Appearance Code does regulate front -loaded
or side -loaded garages.
Mr. Keenan noted that he Is surprised that with this $400-$500,000 price range, the
elevations are finished as such. Is this process different? It was his Impression that PZC
has always reviewed the elevations from an architectural and finishing perspective.
Ms. Martin responded that applicants often volunteer to share their elevations, but this Is
not required. Any required architectural details are prescribed in the development text,
as that will regulate the zoning.
Mr. Keenan stated that when the materials are discussed for the development text, it is
necessary to have examples of elevations to demonstrate what Is Intended; for Instance,
whether it be stone or brick. Further in the process, they should share some elevations.
Ms. Martin responded that is an option. Staff has certainly seen development tents that
have character Images, but the text is the regulating component. This development text,
in particular, does place additional regulations on homes fronting Hyland -Croy Road due
to the increased visibility of those lots. Some architectural details are required to be
added or restricted.
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that in the development standards, it speaks of the
cladding materials and percentages that are a little higher than what is found in the
general Appearance Code. It also addresses the concern about the garage frontages and
percentages. It is not unusual to have the development standards In text form versus
Pictorial form.
Ms. Salay asked for confirmation that there will be a final development plan stage at PZC,
where there are renderings and discussions regarding building materials and
percentages, and where fine-tuning occurs.
Ms. Husak responded that does not occur for single-family platted lots. There were many
Images In the Riviera text for architectural purposes. However, as the final development
plans were finalized, PZC approved landscaping, street sections and the final plats, but
did not review or approve elevations for any of the individual homes. The Celtic Crossing
text has no images. The image -heavy plans are for the newer developments —Tartan
West, Tartan Ridge, and Riviera. However, it is not a requirement in Dublin's Zoning
Code to have elevations approved for single-family platted lots. The percentage
perspective is considered with condominiums.
Mayor Peterson invited public testimony on Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 or 28-17.
There was no public testimony.
Mayor Peterson called for the vote on Ordinance 26-17.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Amorose-Groomes, yes;
Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Mayor Peterson moved to amend Ordinance 27-17 to include the two additional
conditions, as recommended by staff:
8) That the development text be modified to permit tree -for -tree replacement
non -landmark trees with a minimum of 301.5 Inches to be replaced on-site;
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
May 22, 2017 Page 14 of 19
9) That the applicant work with staff to ensure that any additional inches
provided are appropriately located on the site to ensure the long-term survival
of replacement trees.
Mr. Keenan seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Alutto,
yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes.
Vote on Ordinance 27-17 as amended: Mr. Keenan, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr.
Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose
Groomes, yes.
Mayor Peterson moved to approve the Preliminary Plat.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor
Peterson, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes.
Vote on Ordinance 28-17: Ms. Salty, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes;
Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes.
Mayor Peterson moved to dispense with Council Rules of Order to address
Ordinances 30-17, 31-17(Ameoded) and 32-17 together.
Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms.
Splay, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
44w Qlaikuad-Nle-Wes#9F6iaaaces3B-1-7,rgl 17 and 32—_7 into he-reeer6
Godina
Pravidingfer-thedssuance d!Sale-ef BBnds anthe Maximum Pr line al
Anawat "417396;800ter the -Purpose offaymgthe Eelitss ef-imprerixgihe
Muniapal3evrer-System:
Ord in ree3l—U-(AmendeAj
PreriAing-ferihe!i55nanuranA- Sal e-ef BeMsinthePlead ri P meipal
Ameuat-ef-$878007009for-th¢P4trpese-ef-Paykwpthe GeSts-ef-lrnprevingthe
City's-faalil
9rdinanee32-k7
Previding4erthe4s aaaneeanA-Sale of Bei i it Flex mem-Principal
Amount a 4271276F000 ferthe-Purpese ei-Payintthe-Gests-of-impmvingthe
Glitallas .:eularand Pedestrian-itanspe tatien-System-withinand-Servingthe
Bridge Street ict.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
rw.ami
H fd _ _ _ _ April 24, 2017 Page 27 of 30
OrdiA-Am 20=17
Fatah! sh ng the Locat an and Amount of Cash on Hand forChange Funds.
Mr, stffl,r�t,ted thatthere were RO Changes 8 Ree the first read Rg Th s ord Rance i.,
C1.onnn ndnmA
6ouaEiI h-d—aaq�9n5.
��W On the Ord A-1192 MI 1-tto, wa,; Mr I -d" der, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor
Ordinance -21=.47
Amend ng the Annual Apprnpr at nnn Ord nance florthe F sea' Year End ng
December 31, 2017-
M, f
0 It' Md R the memo There are RO changes 8 Ree the first read Rg OR April 10
Vate OR the Ord RaRE2 V ce Mayor Re Rer, yes; Ms Salay, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes,
uCm
Mayor Peterson moved to suspend COURG I's Rules Of Order �Rd Wdlsg ()1d R�RG99 —16-
17 27-17 and 2R-17togothn.
MrnaL�OR
�n
��W On the MOt on Mayor Roto=rl, Yes; MQ A mums- Groom -Q, yeQ; MQ S -l -y, yes;
Me Mayor Remer,
The Clerk read the follow Rg t ties RtO the record.
Ord n -nm 26-17
Accept ng the An nexat an of 47 366 Acres, M are or Lew, njerame Township,
Un an County t a the C ty of Dubin (Agent: Tom War- AttarneyjAgent for
Ordinance 27-17
Rezoning Approximately 47 Acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District for the Development of the Site with 73 Single-family
Lots and Approximately 21 Acres of Open Space on the East Side of Hyland -
Croy Road, North of the Intersection with Park Mill Drive Under the Provisions
of Zoning Code Section 153.050; and a Preliminary Plat for 73 Single-family
lots, Rights-of-way, and Open Space in Accordance with Chapter 152, the
Subdivision Regulations (Case #140862/PDP/PP).
Ordinance 28-17
Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with
Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC for the Autumn Rose Woods Development.
Ms. Salay introduced Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 and 28-17.
Nicole Martin Planner stated that this is a request for consideration of an annexation,
rezoning and preliminary development, preliminary plat and infrastructure agreement.
She inquired if Council would prefer to have the staff presentation at this meeting or the
next hearing.
Ms. Salay suggested that, due to the lateness of the hour, she would prefer to defer that
to the next hearing.
Council concurred. The presentation will be at the second reading/public hearing, which
is scheduled on May 22, 2017.
Mayor Peterson inquired if the applicant has any objection to deferral of the presentation
to the second reading.
The applicant indicated he has no objection.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
There will be a second reading/public hearing at the May 22, 2017 Council meeting.
,: ,. w•mamerrsrrawr'mr
r�.�.
am..
�mam_s.
... .fir!
..'1.
�... .......
RECORD OF ACTION
city of
Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission
OHIO, USA Thursday, March 2, 2017 1 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road
16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Preliminary Plat
Proposal:
Rezoning of approximately 47 acres from R, Rural District, to PUD,
Planned Unit Development District, for the future development of 73
single-family lots and approximately 21 acres of open space. The
site is located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road, north of the
intersection with Park Mill Drive.
Request:
Request for review of a Concept Plan and for review and
recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with
Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of the Zoning
Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and
recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat
under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations.
Applicant:
Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC.
Planning Contacts:
Nichole Martin, Planner I and Claudia D. HUI AICP, Senior
Planner.
Contact Information:
(614) 410-4600; nmartin@dublin.oh.us or chusak@dublin.oh.us
MOTION 1: Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to
City Council for this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan because this proposal complies with the
applicable review criteria and the existing development standards within the area with seven conditions:
1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the first
final development plan;
2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way
dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval of
a final plat;
3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and
reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior a City Council
hearing of the rezoning;
4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provide a southbound left turn lane and
northbound right turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site;
5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared used path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive
to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior a
City Council hearing of the rezoning;
6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plans prior to a City
Council hearing of the rezoning; and
7) In a=rdance the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the Appearance Code
Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs.
*Thomas Hart, agreed to the above conditions.
Page 1 of 2
PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov
RECORD OF ACTION
City of
Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission
OHIO, USA Thursday, March 2, 2017 1 6:30 pm
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road
16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Preliminary Plat
VOTE: 4-0.
RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan will be forwarded to City Council with a
recommendation of approval.
RECORDED VOTES:
Victoria Newell
Absent
Amy Salay
Absent
Chris Brown
Yes
Cathy De Rosa
Yes
Robert Miller
Yes
Deborah Mitchell
Absent
Stephen Stidhem
Yes
MOTION #2: Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded to forward a recommendation of approval
to City Council for this Preliminary Plat because this proposal complies with the applicable review criteria
with one condition:
1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City
Council submittal.
*Thomas Hart, agreed to the above condition.
VOTE: 4-0.
RESULT: This Preliminary Plat will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of
approval.
RECORDED VOTES:
Victoria Newell Absent
Amy Salay Absent
Chris Brown Yes
Cathy De Rosa Yes
Robert Miller Yes
Deborah Mitchell Absent
Stephen Stidhem Yes
STAj • CERTIFICATION
N/hole Martin
Planner
Page 2 of 2
PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov
City of
Dublin
OHIO, USA
MEETING MINUTES
Planning & Zoning Commission
Thursday, March 2, 2017
AGENDA
1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road
16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan (Discussion Only)
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0)
Preliminary Plat (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0)
The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Other Commission members present were: Cathy De Rosa, Stephen Stidhem, Chris Brown, and Bot
Miller. Victoria Newell, Amy Salay, and Deborah Mitchell were absent. City representatives present were:
Phil Hartmann, Claudia Husak, Nichole Martin, Michael Hendershot, and Flora Rogers.
Administrative Business
Motion and Vote
Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to accept the documents into the record. The vote was as
follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 4 - 0)
Motion and Vote
Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to approve the January 19, 2017, meeting minutes. The vote
was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 4 - 0)
The Vice Chair briefly explained the rules and procedures of the Planning and Zoning Commission
1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road
16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan
Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan
Preliminary Plat
The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, said the following application is for a rezoning of approximately 47 acres
from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for the future development of 73 single-
family lots and approximately 21 acres of open space. He said the site is on the east side of Hyland -Croy
Road, north of the intersection with Parkmill Drive. He stated this is a request for a review of a Concept
Plan and for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a Preliminary
Development Plan under the provisions of the Zoning Code §153.050. He added this is also a request for
a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat under the provisions of
the Subdivision Regulations.
PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 8
Nichole Martin reviewed the background for this case and presented an aerial view of the site comprised
of two parcels currently within Jerome Township. She stated the southern parcel is the site of Autumn
Rose Farms and both parcels have existing homes. She presented the existing conditions for the southern
parcel as well as the residential development in Park Place to the south. She also presented a photograph
of the residential development to the north as well as the split -rail fence.
Ms. Martin explained the Community Plan is a policy document that guides development as well as
natural resources within the City of Dublin and it contains land use recommendations, thoroughfare
recommendations, and special considerations for pockets around and throughout the City. She presented
the Future Land Use Map, which shows a recommendation for this site of Mixed -Residential - Rural
Transition with a density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre and the plan encourages development to preserve
open spaces. She said areas directly adjacent to the property on the north, east, and south are
designated Suburban Residential — Low Density with 2 units per acre and the areas west are designated
mainly Parks/Open Space but also Flex Office/Research & Development.
Ms. Martin presented the Thoroughfare Plan that is part of the Community Plan including the Rural
Roadway Character. She reported a traffic impact study was submitted as part of this application. She
explained since Hyland -Croy Road is within the jurisdiction of Union County there was coordination
between that county and the City of Dublin on this effort. She reported they have settled on a right-of-
way request of 50 feet from the center line and the development text provides for the rural roadway
character with large setbacks and naturalized landscaping.
Ms. Martin presented the proposed Preliminary Development Plan that includes 73 single-family lots, a
net density of 1.54 units per acre, 21 acres of Reserves/Open Space, and five public streets. She said this
will contain 72 single-family homes plus the existing home to be preserved on Lot 8. She said
development will occur in two sections, 37 new single-family lots in Section 1 as well as 2 Open Space
Reserves and three public streets; Section 2 will contain 36 lots, the one existing Lot 8, four Open Space
Reserves, as well as two public streets.
Ms. Martin said the applicant has provided an illustrative plan of the proposal, which she presented to
begin to depict the character of the site. She noted the large existing tree stand to be preserved as well
as the Open Space along Hyland -Croy Road being consistent with the development to the north and
south of this site.
Ms. Martin said the proposal is consistent with the adjacent developments to the north and south of the
site. She stated the proposed lots are 0.25 acres in size with the exception of Lot 8, which is 1.5 acres in
size.
Ms. Martin said the development text also includes architectural character and building material
standards. She noted these are proposed to be consistent with recently approved developments in Dublin
including Wellington Reserve and Celtic Crossing.
The applicants provided a proposed circulation plan that was presented by Ms. Martin that includes both
shared -use path and sidewalk connections, which connect to the neighborhoods to the north and south
as well as providing regional path connections along Hyland -Croy Road north to the Glacier Ridge Nature
Park. She stated that Engineering is requesting an additional shared -use path connection along Johnston
Drive to provide an east/west connection.
Chris Brown inquired about the shared -use paths. Ms. Martin explained a shared -use path is typically an
asphalt bike path, which is wider than a sidewalk to be used by both pedestrians and cyclists.
Ms. Martin indicated that the applicant is required to dedicate 3.14 acres of Open Space to the City of
Dublin and the applicant is providing 21.38 acres, 16 of which are continuous within Reserve "C. She
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 8
said Reserves "A" and "B" are located on the Hyland -Croy Road frontage intended to be a naturalized
landscape to be detailed at the Final Development Plan. She noted the stormwater basin, which is located
in Reserve "C" that the City will both own and maintain. She said Reserve "D" provides the shared -use
path connection and Reserve "E" is an existing wetland that will also be preserved — owned and
maintained by the City as a natural habitat. Lastly, Reserve "F" is a small landscape island located at the
terminus of Oliver Way. Additionally, she said the HOA will be required to maintain the existing split -rail
fence abutting residential properties but the section of fence along Reserve "C" will be removed to
provide public access to this open space.
Ms. Martin said the Preliminary Plat is the final component to this application; the plat demarcates a
number of standards that are described in the development text. She explained the plat memorializes five
public roads, six open spaces, and 73 lots and demarcates several tree preservation zones and a front
building line of 20 feet, which is consistent across all lots.
Ms. Martin said approval is recommended for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with
seven conditions:
1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the
first Final Development Plan;
2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way
dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval
of a Final Plat;
3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and
reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council
hearing of the rezoning;
4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provides a southbound left -turn lane
and northbound right -turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site;
5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared -use path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive
to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior
to a City Council hearing of the rezoning;
6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plan prior to a City
Council hearing of the rezoning; and
7) That in accordance with the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the
Appearance Code Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs.
*Thomas Hart, agreed to all 7 conditions.
Ms. Martin said a recommendation of approval to City Council is recommended for a Preliminary Plat with
the following condition:
1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City
Council submittal.
Thomas Hart, agreed to the above condition.
Bob Miller asked if the City received any feedback that can be shared from the Home Owner's Association
meeting in November 2016. Ms. Martin explained the HOA meeting was sponsored by the applicant,
however, staff was in attendance. She said the proposal at the November meeting was consistent with
what was shown in May 2015, Concept B. She indicated there were some questions about the product
type as well as maintenance and ownership of open spaces and treatments.
Mr. Miller inquired about Reserve "A". Ms. Martin answered Reserve "A" is along the Hyland -Croy Road
frontage and the character would be dictated by the existing residential development to the north and
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 8
the south as well as the Hyland -Croy Road character study, which is an update to the Community Plan
that took place in 2011. She said it will be an open space with shared -use path connections so that a bike
path will extend all the way up from Park Place through Autumn Rose Woods to Bishop's Crossing.
Ms. Martin said stormwater management is not included in this proposal at this time for this subarea. Ms.
De Rosa asked if the water retention is a pond or a dry basin. Ms. Martin answered it is a pond and will
also serve as a visual amenity.
Steve Stidhem asked if there will be a border, fence, or path around the pond. Ms. Martin said the closest
path will be the one field located through Reserve "C" connecting to Park Place Park. She added there will
not be space to accommodate a path behind the proposed residential lots.
Ms. De Rosa recalled discussing this the last time and among the ideas she recalled a boardwalk
proposed to make that a shared amenity.
Mr. Brown indicated the boardwalk Ms. De Rosa is referring to might have been for the Avondale
development.
Mr. Stidhem said paths around ponds are a nice amenity.
Claudia Husak referred to the engineering drawings and noted the significant grading around the pond to
get this stormwater management into the space that is fairly close to the lots. In this area, she said there
is a lot of sensitivity required to retain as many of the existing trees as possible and creating more paths
there was discouraged in order to have more trees preserved.
Mr. Miller recalled a pathway through the woods and asked staff to clarify if they eliminated those to
preserve more trees. Ms. Husak said staff encouraged the applicant to provide a path through the woods.
She said staff walked the woods with Parks and Recreation staff and there is a lot of concern with putting
a path through there in terms of getting any kind of equipment into this area to clear and to pave to
create any sort of path. She said this is not the final path location it is simply illustrating there will be a
path through the woods and it ends at the playground of the adjacent neighborhood park.
Tom Hart, Two Miranova Place, thanked staff for the excellent presentation and history of their journey.
He introduced Matt Callahan, VP Land Acquisition, Pulte Homes; and Greg Chillog, Landscape Architect,
principal of the Edge Group. He said Pulte's goal with this site is to maximize land and home values by
building under Dublin's community standards. He said this property is surrounded on three sides by
Dublin communities and there are utility and street stubs coming to the site from Dublin so it makes
sense to follow Dublin's high standards. He said they meet the Code and Architectural requirements and
comply with the Community Plan in terms of density and a recommendation of preserving the wooded
acreage, the multi -use path connections, the open space requirements, and the large setbacks along
Hyland -Croy Road. He said this is a careful balance with the number of homes they can build with
significant preservation. He said the empty -nester product on this site comes with less impact on traffic
and schools.
Matt Callahan, 4900 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, VP Pulte Homes, said they presented this plan informally
two years ago but through the process, their plans have evolved. He said they have witnessed a surge
and need for empty -nester, active adult style housing. He described the proposed units as upscale patio
ranch homes with a master bedroom on the first floor along with all everyday living occurring on the first
floor and the second floor features lofts and additional bedrooms. He added they were designed with
modern features and range in size from 2,300 square feet to 3,400 square feet but there are options that
increase the size. The development will have all natural materials he said, four-sided architecture, and
decorated garage doors. He indicated the prices will range in the upper $400,000s into low $500,000s
with an average price point of $500,000.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 5 of 8
Mr. Miller inquired about the patios and decks. Mr. Callahan said the choices will be consumer driven
within the Zoning Code and there will be strict restrictions, reviewed by a Design Review Board. He said
this will also be geared towards the empty -nester buyer — those that are still working and are active but
may not have kids at home and not ready for a conventional retirement -style living in a condominium
where everything is replicated and standardized.
Mr. Miller clarified that a home could be built without a patio or deck during construction with the intent
to be added after construction.
Ms. De Rosa asked if the larger Lots 16 — 21 on the cul-de-sac will be the same size and flavor as the
others. Mr. Callahan said the homes will all be from the same series and consistent in terms of design
throughout the community. He added those lots are considered the more premium lots in the community
so he would expect they would tend towards the higher range of homes.
The Vice Chair invited public comment.
Melissa Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, thanked the developers and staff for the community meeting held
in November 2016. She confirmed the shared path on Johnston Road, Mill Springs, and Oliver Way will be
the same width as ones found on Tullymore and Parkmill Drive and will be connected. She asked that a
path around the pond be considered and trees could be removed here rather than around the cul-de-sac
area to create usable space. She suggested a shelter or a bench to be incorporated. She said she was
concerned about the product switching from the two-story home to a ranch home considering the size of
the lots. She said the footprint from larger ranch homes will make the area feel denser.
Senthia Balasubramanian, 7486 Barrister Drive, asked if any recreation area has been planned for this
community because Park Place has one small park but if these houses are going to use the same park,
they would prefer they had their own separate park.
The Vice Chair confirmed that would be noted in the record and Parks and Recreation will review that
consideration.
Bob Clawson, 6735 Burnside Lane, asked why the fence is being removed around the woods where it
backs up to the houses.
Kan Zhao, 7525 Hyland -Croy Road, said his residence is on the opposite side of this area. He indicated
the traffic will increase when all these houses are purchased. He asked if Hyland -Croy Road could be
widened to improve the road conditions.
The Vice Chair said that section is in Union County's jurisdiction, currently.
Holly Olszewski, 7471 Wisdom Lane, inquired about the split -rail fence around the property. Ms. Martin
clarified there are no new fences proposed as part of this development. She said the existing split -rail
fence is proposed to be maintained by the HOA when there are residential lots abutting each other. She
added the split -rail fence around Reserve "C" is proposed to be removed because the City would prefer
that the publicly dedicated open space be accessible to all of the public.
Ms. Olszewski asked if additional trees are planned for the existing tree line that runs between the
existing subdivision and the proposed subdivision. Ms. Martin answered there will be additional plantings
on the lots and there is a 15 -foot tree preservation zone delineated on the Preliminary Plat along the
southern and northern property lines.
Ms. Olszewski asked when Hyland -Croy Road is expanded if it will cut into Reserves "A" & "B". Ms. Martin
reiterated that Hyland -Croy Road is maintained by Union County but there is constant coordination
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 6 of 8
between both the City Engineers and the Union County Engineer. She said the Thoroughfare Plan makes
recommendations and that has been signed off on by the Union County Engineer as part of this
application so the applicant is dedicating 50 feet of right-of-way from the center line, which is 10
additional feet to what already exists today. She added the applicant will be required to make
improvements recommended as part of the traffic impact study that was submitted to both the City and
the Union County Engineer, which include a southbound left -turn lane as well as a north -bound right -turn
lane. Due to a future Hyland -Croy roadway character study to be conducted it will call for this to be a
four -lane -divided, variable -width median road with a rural character but that is currently not programmed
in the CIP.
Ms. Olszewski indicated whether there will be a path around the pond or not, her family will still walk
their dogs around this pond and several others, which is a nice community amenity.
Lavanya Munaswamy, 6762 Park Mill Drive, said his home is right behind the new construction. He asked
if there will be an impact to the homes that back up to the construction and if the construction would be
completed in two phases, Sections 1 then Section 2.
The Vice Chair indicated the Building Department usually helps govern that with the developer. He
encouraged the homeowner to speak with the superintendent when the construction trailer shows up on
site.
Shen Guohong, 6811 Bishops Crossing Circle, inquired about the fence, to which Ms. Martin said she
would address along with all the other questions. He also asked about the retention pond shown in the
earlier proposal he is not seeing now. He confirmed there is only one opening for the community to
Hyland -Croy Road and thought that also was different from the previous design.
Ms. Martin explained all streets in this proposal are public streets and will be built and maintained by
public standards; as such they will have curbs and gutters to direct stormwater. She said it is typical to
consolidate an entrance to a single point in order to have separation between entrances. She reported
there was just a single entrance proposed off of Hyland -Croy Road at the previous review.
Ms. Martin stated the fence along the northern property line is proposed to remain between abutting
residential developments and will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association.
Ms. Martin restated the pond will be located within Reserve "C" and is intended to handle the stormwater
management for the entire site.
Ms. Husak reminded everyone that this is the Preliminary Development Plan stage so there is no final
engineering, landscaping, or tree surveys available or required at this point and there will be a very
similar plan coming back to the PZC for approval in the future should City Council sign off on this
Preliminary Development Plan.
Ms. De Rosa asked staff if the home on Lot 8 is sold in the future, if only one home could be built on that
lot to which Ms. Martin answered affirmatively.
Mr. Stidhem asked if the traffic study took into account the closing of the Park Place entries to which Ms.
Martin also responded affirmatively.
Ms. De Rosa inquired about house layout and density feel. Mr. Stidhem answered the Zoning Code limits
lot coverage to 45%. Mr. Hart answered they expect the layout that is very similar to the neighborhood in
terms of lot coverage and how the houses sit on the lot. He said most of these homes have more square
footage on the first floor but the base footprint is going to look a lot like what is surrounding this
development.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 8
Ms. Husak reported that staff requested lot layouts from the applicant for the smaller lots to ensure the
houses, driveways, and outside amenities would fit within the buildable areas per Code.
Mr. Stidhem said he understands this is for an older community but they are still going to have kids. He
suggested between Lot 15 & 16 it would be an appropriate area for a park since there is a path going
through there anyway. Mr. Hart referred to page 15 of the development text that breaks out which open
spaces and reserves are to be maintained privately by the HOA and which is being dedicated to the City.
He said the entire area of Reserve "C", mainly the woods, and pond are being dedicated to the City with
the idea that Parks and Recreation will properly program the area. On that same page, he said it calls out
the possible uses that could be there, including a playground.
Mr. Brown said the pond that we are forcing into that spot he would much rather see in a natural state
even if it means removing a few trees to make it a more fitting pond as opposed to a detention pond or
retention area and be developed in a way the public and the neighbors could benefit. He indicated he is a
tree hugger and there are a lot of trees there but at the same time there needs to be a balance between
creating a more natural pond and blending it with the tree area, which would be his recommendation to
Council.
Ms. De Rosa echoed Mr. Brown's comment to Council adding she would like to see it as a walkable,
wonderful amenity for the community. She said she really likes how the walking paths connect through
there.
Mr. Stidhem said in general, he likes the layout, it is a good mix of the land use incorporating open space
but he is concerned about the traffic that will pull into Johnston Drive because of the closure of the Park
Place entrance.
Mr. Miller agreed. He said the developer listened very well and brought back almost exactly what the
Commission had requested so he thanked the developer. He stated he likes it and is thrilled that the
empty -nester concept is being addressed and it will look really good between those two existing
developments.
Mr. Brown said the City appreciates the amount of reserve land.
Phil Hartmann said he wanted to remind the Commission before they go through the motions that there
are only four members in attendance so the majority is voting and three affirmative votes are required to
pass the application.
Motion and Vote
Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Rezoning
with a Preliminary Development Plan with seven conditions:
1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the
first Final Development Plan;
2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way
dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval
of a Final Plat;
3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and
reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council
hearing of the rezoning;
4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provides a southbound left -turn lane
and northbound right -turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes
Page 8 of 8
5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared -use path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive
to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior
to a City Council hearing of the rezoning;
6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plan prior to a City
Council hearing of the rezoning; and
7) That in accordance with the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the
Appearance Code Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes.
(Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0)
Motion and Vote
Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Preliminary
Plat with one condition:
1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City
Council submittal.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Brown, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; and Ms. De Rosa, yes.
(Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0)
Communications
Claudia Husak said this will be processed through Council in April together with the Annexation so there
will be notices sent to the adjacent residents.
Ms. Husak said Council is having a Work Session on March 6"' for the library, which will be live -streamed.
She said there is also a joint Work Session on April 171 with PZC and City Council.
Cathy and Chris stated they would be attending the APA conference.
The Vice Chair adjourned the meeting at 7:44 pm.
As approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 2017.
City of Dublin
Land Use and long
Range Planning PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
5800 Shier Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236
phone 614.410.4600 RECORD OF DISCUSSION
fax 614.410.4747
www.dublinohlousa.gov MAY 21, 2015
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
1. Means/Griffith Property
15-030INF
7540 and 7660 Hyland -Croy Road
Informal Review
Proposal: A potential residential development of a 48 -acre site on the east side of
Hyland -Croy Road across from the Glacier Ridge Metro Park, south of
Brand Road. The proposal includes two concepts for development for
single-family lots of varying sizes with up to 70 lots and up to 21 acres of
open space.
Request: Informal review and feedback for a potential residential development
prior to a future Concept Plan application.
Applicant: Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC.
Representative: Thomas L. Hart, Esq. Isaac Wiles Burkholder & Teetor, LLC.
Planning Contact: Marie Downie, Planner.
Contact Information: (614) 410-4679, mdownie@dublin.oh.us
RESULT: The Commission informally reviewed and provided feedback for two different site layouts for a
potential residential development on a 48 -acre site on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road currently within
Jerome Township across from Glacier Ridge Metro Park. The Commission supported the preservation of
the existing trees and using the area as an added park amenity. The Commission had concerns regarding
the dry basins/bio-swales as potential stormwater management methods and asked the applicant to
provide additional information on how these would look and function.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Victoria Newell
Yes
Amy Salay
Yes
Chris Brown
Yes
Cathy De Rosa
Yes
Robert Miller
Yes
Deborah Mitchell
Absent
Stephen Stidhem
Yes
STAFF CERFICATION
Marie Downie, Planner
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 23
1. Means/Griffith Property 7540 and 7660 Hyland -Croy Road
15-O3OINF Informal Review
The Chair, Ms. Newell, said the following application is a request for informal review and feedback for a
potential residential development of a 48 -acre site on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road across from the
Glacier Ridge Metro Park, south of Brand Road. She said the proposal includes two concepts for
development for single-family lots and open space.
Marie Downie reported there was a neighborhood meeting regarding the proposal and approximately 15
nearby residents attended who expressed concerns about the lot sizes, buffering between the
subdivisions, retaining the existing fence surrounding the property, construction debris, and home values.
Ms. Downie said the Community Plan identifies future land uses for areas of land that are not currently
within the City for the event that they are annexed. She said future land uses have been identified for the
parcels along Hyland -Croy Road and to the west, which are not part of the City of Dublin. She said the
future land use for this site in particular is Mixed -Residential Rural Transition, which is intended to
provide a density of 1.5 units per acre with a mix of housing types on smaller lots and significant open
space. She noted the majority of the surrounding uses are residential.
Ms. Downie said the Thoroughfare Plan identifies four major categories to define the visual experience for
the major thoroughfare. She presented the characteristics for the rural category of which Hyland -Croy is
classified.
Ms. Downie said the site is included in the Northwest Glacier Ridge Special Area Plan, which provides
concepts to guide future development of this area. She said it recommends the use of Conservation
Design principles to preserve the existing wooded area and maximize views. She presented a sample
layout that includes a mixture of housing types preserving the existing residential structure and the
continuation of open space along Hyland -Croy Road.
Amy Salay asked how many units are depicted in the rendering.
Claudia Husak said this would correspond to the 1.5 units per acre future land use density assigned.
Matt Callahan, 5782 Tarton Circle North, said he was here on behalf of the applicant — Pulte Homes. He
said Pulte is relatively new to Central Ohio and is now located in Dublin. He said they are ready to launch
the first all -Pulte Homes community at the Celtic Crossing Community to the west side of Hyland -Croy
Road, across from Jerome High School. He described Pulte as a unique style of homes and floor designs
new to Central Ohio.
Mr. Callahan said the goals for this site are to: bring high quality housing; protect and enhance home
values in the adjacent neighborhood; develop density comparable to the Community Plan; incorporate
high standards; tie into the existing roadway and bike path connections; maintain a rural feel and
character of Hyland -Croy Road; maintain generous setbacks, protect the wooded open space on the
eastern portion of the site; and add to the existing Park Place Park. He said there are two concept plans
to be presented this evening and neither have less than 40% open space. He said the goal is to obtain
feedback from both the Commission and the residents.
Greg Chillog, Edge Group, 330 W. Spring Street, Suite 350, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, said a couple of
options were developed to present with a lot of similarities and a couple of major differences between the
two. He said the applicant views the site as an infill site with many existing conditions that surround the
property that dictate what can be done on the interior of the property.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 23
Mr. Chillog presented the site that includes two street connections and an extension of the bike path
leading to the park area to the south. He said both concept plans have approximately 1.5 units per acre.
He said Concept A represents 75 units of 70 to 80 -foot lots. He noted the connections and the main drive
allowing for a grid system similar to what exists to the north and south of the site. He said the larger lots
face Hyland -Croy Road and the perimeter of the site and the smaller lots are located at the site's interior.
He said the idea of Concept A would be to extend a cul-de-sac into the woods to handle stormwater and
drainage and allow for a larger green space as a focal point. He said Concept B is an alternative to handle
the quantity and quality of stormwater. He said there are the same neighborhood connections as Concept
A but the entrance would be midway into the project allowing a grid to the north and to the south, but
staying out of the trees. He noted a smaller pond and bio-swales or dry retention areas to hold the water
longer and clean it before it arrives at the pond. He said the big differences between the two plans deals
with the stormwater.
Victoria Newell asked how the bio-swales and bio -retention areas would be planted.
Mr. Chillog responded that right now it is a "big idea" that needs development with a detailed planting
plan. He said grass would not be planted to be mowed. He said it should be under drained. Typically, he
said, there is a pipe with a catch basin in the rear of all the lots but the applicant is hoping for something
different.
Ms. Salay asked how deep the ones behind the lots need to be as well as the one up front
Mr. Chillog said he did not know the exact depth but imagined it would be three to five feet maximum.
He said the space drawn between the lots allows for a gradual depth.
Bob Miller asked who would be responsible for the green space. Mr. Chillog said he thought all the green
space would be dedicated to the City and most likely, the frontage would be maintained by the HOA.
Ms. Husak said there have been some discussions about those areas between the lots since they are
intended in this particular concept to be stormwater management areas, that there needs to be some
care taken of delineating those so that residents know where the lots end and the possibility of dedicated
City maintained reserves.
Mr. Miller asked if the woods were pretty wet.
Ms. Husak said the reason why woods usually exist is because the area is wet. She said there were
discussions with the applicant early on about considering the area within the woods as stormwater
management to be counted. She indicated the quality and quantity water standards had not been
reviewed yet. She said this may cause more disturbance than desired so preserving the woods has been
recommended as the preferable option.
Cathy De Rosa asked if there were examples in the City of Dublin where this is successful.
Ms. Husak responded there were not any good ones, yet. She said there is a landscape architect on staff
who has a tremendous amount of knowledge of where this has worked successfully in other parts of the
country. With this proposal, she said we will rely heavily on her to evaluate our past mistakes.
Ms. Newell asked if that was achievable since bio-swales are difficult to have look nice and function well.
Ms. Husak answered this is definitely something doable. She explained to get the density to work out
with a single-family type product and tree preservation being a high priority, something different has to
occur on this site. She said she is confident this can be successful; it will just take a different approach
than what has been done in the past.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 4 of 23
Mr. Chillog said this is often done in parking lots where it is a lot easier and sees this as being closer in
size to what is accomplished in a parking lot that might drain two or three bays to an area with a nice
clean edge around it.
Ms. Newell said these appear very rectilinear in that plan. She asked if there was ability within this plan
for undulation or to soften the edges that might make them more naturalized in appearance and less
ditch -like.
Mr. Chillog answered affirmatively and explained that 40 or 50 feet would allow for softened edges and
undulation.
The Chair invited public comment.
Ms. Downie posted the discussion questions up on the screen.
Alysia Cassini, 7545 Marston Lane, said she attended the meeting hosted by the developer where they
stated their development should be equal or better to Park Place and Bishop Crossing. She indicated their
proposal was for single-family homes starting at $400,000 or more. She said she was thrown off to hear
the term multi -family homes for this project tonight. She said the acreage for these lots span .20 - .23
acres per home. She requested that the lot sizes match Park Place and Bishop Crossing. She asked the
Commission to focus on preserving the woods as part of Park Place Park and use the Conservation
Design principles. She suggested to the developers that they invite the entire neighborhood to the
neighborhood meetings instead of just the residents that border the property.
Marian Vordemark, 6834 Stillhouse Lane, in Post Preserve, said she has been president of their HOA for
over five years. She said she attended the meeting hosted by the Developer, even though she did not
receive a letter. She indicated she understands there is a rule in place that Developers only need to notify
residents within 150 feet. She said she is in favor of residential development, which mirrors Park Place.
She said Post Preserve and Park Place are joint HOAs, consisting of 292 home sites joined together under
one body. She stated Park Place lost 57 ornamental cherry trees at their entrance and it takes a long time
to grow trees. She said the woods in this proposal have many mature trees, which she would like to see
preserved.
Mr. Brown said two concepts have been presented and asked Ms. Vordemark which plan she would
prefer and she responded Concept B.
Julia Turley, 6727 Burnside Lane, said her home backs up to the woods and prefers Concept B. She said
she agreed with the comments made by Ms. Cassini. She inquired about the impact to the schools if this
project were to move forward. She noted that nobody can turn left off of Hyland -Croy Road onto Post
Road after 5:00 pm and wanted to know how the traffic flow issues were being addressed with the
increased traffic that would be a result of this development. She indicated she appreciated the
stormwater being addressed.
The Chair said Staff may be able to address some of her concerns.
Steve Langworthy said Planning does not have any control over the
regular communication. He reported that maps and figures have been
remaining developable land in the northwest area and the potential
developed. He said this information allows the schools some advanced
Ms. Turley said trailers are already being added to the high school.
school issues but stated there is
provided to the schools about the
number of homes that could be
planning.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 5 of 23
Mr. Langworthy confirmed there are some temporary measures being taken but will be some permanent
building as well.
Ms. Turley said that would translate into a need for more schools, more building, and increased property
taxes. She asked why all the neighbors were not notified.
The Chair stated there are some very specific regulations when an applicant files, they have to notify
residents and businesses within a public distance around that property that does not necessarily require
notification to an entire neighborhood.
Ms. Husak pointed out that the applicant is not required to meet with neighborhoods; Planning asks
applicants to do that, which this applicant agreed to do. She said they used the same notification
requirements that staff followed for this public meeting. Additionally, she said the City has the policy to
post a sign in front of a respective neighborhood alerting them of the public meeting as well as having a
consistent presence on the internet.
Amy Salay suggested contacting HOA presidents, who can then notify the neighbors.
Ms. Husak said that is part of the rules as well.
Ms. Salay said several of the City Council members meet with the school district on a monthly basis. She
said the school district has been aware that we have developable land in the district and we are doing
our best to plan that. Additionally, she said this area has been in the Community Plan since 2007. She
indicated all of us would like to see this area remain a horse farm, but it is private property and they have
the right to develop it. She said the applicant needs to meet the guidelines of our Community Plan, which
is pretty low in terms of density.
Tina Wawszkiewicz said the next case on the agenda this evening includes the possibility of an
annexation of Hyland -Croy Road and particularly the intersection with Post Road. She said if that were to
go forward, Staff would consider with Union County, how a transfer would happen. She reported the
long-term interchange plan is well developed.
Mr. Miller inquired about the SR161/US 33 plan as of today.
Ms. Husak suggested getting into that discussion with the second case as it is more directly impacted.
Joe Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, asked about the intended use for the large lots. He asked if the
existing residential building will be kept intact. He asked if somebody would buy that to live in or if it is
meant to be kept for historical preservation.
Mr. Callahan said the intent is for the existing home on the property to remain in place and the existing
owner could sell in the future.
Mr. Bogner asked about the playgrounds. He said he thought all new developments require a playground
or access to a playground and did not see it in this concept plan other than through a bike path.
The Chair reminded the speakers that this is a Concept Plan for non-binding feedback so in most cases,
all the details will not be available.
Ms. Husak said it is not a requirement of have a playground or access to one.
Mr. Bogner asked if sidewalks are intended for this development. Ms. Husak confirmed that sidewalks are
a requirement.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 6 of 23
Melissa Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, asked that a playground be considered. She said the playgrounds
in Park Place and Bishop Crossing are geared towards two through five-year old children and requests
something appropriate for the next age group. She indicated she prefers paths that are double wide for
when there is a parent with multiple children.
Eileen Corson, 6717 Monticello Lane, said she does not see sidewalk connectivity to Jerome High School.
She said there are a lot of children in middle school now in Park Place so safe access to the high school
would become important. She reiterated that the current surrounding playgrounds are not large. She
stated the woods are very important to her neighborhood.
An unidentified resident said there were a lot of animals in the forest area. She said she was concerned
about the number of children the additional houses would add to the schools and asked if another school
would be needed which would then raise taxes. She said she wants to see the money allocated
appropriately.
The Chair closed the public comment portion of this case.
Chris Brown said every time he sees a dry detention basin or any bio-swale in Dublin; they are unsightly
and is not fond of them so far. He said he is not opposed, just does not like dry shallow areas that get
muddy for five days after a rain. He said he liked the central corridor access of Concept B. He said he
wants to save the trees but at the same time Concept A appeals to him with park -like nature of the
retention ponds and the way it carves into the woods but still preserves a great deal of it. He indicated he
would like to hear a bit more about the product difference that might be offered for sale between
Concept A and Concept B.
Mr. Callahan said Concept A would be geared towards the family buyer with the larger home. He said
Concept B has smaller lots; the applicant has considered incorporating more of the active adult or empty -
nester type housing. He said Pulte is a national company and there is a diverse product range.
Steve Stidhem said he heard the residents say they prefer Concept B over A but he does not like Concept
B with the dry basin and does not anticipate a good fit. He said the only thing he does not like about
Concept A is the cul-de-sac that goes into the woods. He suggested Concept A stopping prior to the
extension through the woods. He said he is concerned about parks. He said Park Place Park appears very
small and asked how it would be addressed. He understands the kids in this area are getting older and
having something more age appropriate would be fantastic. He said he is concerned with Lot 1; it does
not line up with the houses to the north and feels it is too close to the road.
Ms. De Rosa said she is also for preserving the trees. Instead of doing a dry basin, she asked if it is
possible to reconfigure the plan or reduce the number of lots to put another small lake in there. She said
in Concept B, the cul-de-sac is a little bit into the green and wondered if most of the green can be
preserved. She asked if anything could be done to preserve the split -rail fences, farmhouse, and barns
that are on there. She indicated she would also be happy to see front porches incorporated. She added
that bike path connections should be kept and that school connections should be present.
Mr. Miller said he is a fan of Concept B. He proposed bringing walking paths in from the existing park as
well as from the neighborhoods. He said Concept B is taking a huge asset and protecting a few pieces.
He said there are already some horse trails in the woods. He said he agrees with Mr. Brown on the dry
basins and needs to see a good plan. He indicated it is interesting that the applicant has brought up
empty -nester units but would like to see some architectural definition by way of pictures.
Ms. Salay said she was interested in Concept B and saving the trees. She stated she does not want to see
any houses going back into the woods. She indicated she likes walking paths or if it is wet back there, a
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes
Page 7 of 23
pond with a boardwalk. She said there are wet areas in her neighborhood and the boardwalks are
wonderful. She stated she is intrigued by wet basins. She indicated she liked the idea of having the space
between the homes and backyards with the addition of rain gardens. She requested a reconfiguration of
Lots 52 — 56 that go back into the woods; she suggested a park or playground aspect with bike paths.
She said empty -nester high-end style housing as stone cottages with front porch detail would take some
pressure off of the school district as families would not be attracted to that type of housing.
Victoria Newell said she was leaning towards Concept B rather than Concept A. She said there are some
features on Concept A that she was hoping to have a marriage between the two. She asked if the barn is
being preserved in Concept A as an amenity. She said she likes the idea of preserving the barn but has
no idea what condition this barn is in.
Mr. Chillog said they could explore the condition of the barn.
Ms. Newell said she likes the larger pond feature in Concept A that appears as a nice park amenity. She
said there is a difference between a dry basin and a bio-swale. She explained that bio-swales will in fact
hold water and are intended to have a plant matrix in them. She said what is difficult is keeping up that
plant matrix. She said bio-swales are not maintenance free and if not properly maintained, they become
a ditch; her concern is long-term. She invited Engineering's comments as to whether they really filter
water.
Aaron Stanford said it is one of the approved measures for stormwater management and believes within
reason, if properly maintained, can be successful.
Ms. Newell asked what the City's requirements are for a bio-swale.
Mr. Stanford said Engineering would want to have assurances that there were adequate outlets. He said
they typically account for very heavy rain events and provide for flood volume through normal
neighborhoods so it is not damaging to structures and would do that same analysis with this type of set
up.
Ms. Newell said she is not opposed to the bio-swales but has concerns regarding the aesthetics and
maintenance. She indicated she likes the preservation of the woods more in Concept B. She said she
would envision those woods to have some naturalized footpaths incorporated so it is an amenity for the
neighborhood. She likes the water feature as it might be a little bit larger.
Mr. Brown said in Brandon, there is an interesting pond in the woods that has a nice fishing pier and dock
and asked if there was an opportunity here to make this a nice feature for the neighborhoods to go back
and hang out at the pond and fish. He said that has really become an event for kids in Dublin; there is
actually a fishing circuit.
Mr. Stidhem inquired about the fence.
Mr. Callahan said the fence was a topic at the meeting with the residents and it had not been reviewed
up until that point. He said he believes the applicant can do a good job at preserving a lot of the fence on
the northern side of the property.
Claudia D. Husak
From: Bob Clawson <bobclawsonl@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 11:21 AM
To: Claudia D. Husak; Cathy K. De Rosa
Subject: Autumn Rose Woods
Importance: High
Claudia,
I have spent a great deal of time on educating my neighbors on the Fence situation with Autumn Rose Woods
development. I have also done my best to keep them up to date with everything associated with the fence. I can tell
you that every single homeowner that backs up to the fence wants it to stay. The number one reason is we don't want
public access to our back yards. This is a safety issue for our kids, pets and homes in general. We also have a special
needs child who's parents bought their home because the fence was there. If it were to be removed this would be a
major safety issue for them because their child could run deep into the woods and get seriously injured. As far as the
woods, that is a major safety issue as well. I can tell you that right behind my home is a swamp and mosquito
infested. There are trees down, branches hanging from the trees just dangling. If kids went in there it would be very
dangerous and would open the City up to a lot of liability.
The bottom line is, every single homeowner who backs up to the fence wants it to stay intact. Please take the advice of
Dublin City Council and approve the fence to stay for all the citizens of Dublin.
Thank you very much for taking time to hear our concerns, it is truly appreciated. Feel free to contact me with any
questions.
Sincerely,
Bob Clawson
The Clawson Network
Keller Williams Consultants Realty
Your Home Consultant For Life
614-595-1144
bobclawsonl CEDgma i I.com
www.theclawsonnetwork.com
Download my Mobile App
Claudia D. Husak
From: Kathleen Cripe <katykcripe@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 7:47 AM
To: Claudia D. Husak; Cathy K. De Rosa
Subject: Bishop Crossing Fence
Good morning!
My family and I live at 6767 Burnside Lane in Bishop's Crossing. We built one of the fortunate houses that back up to the
lovely woods that is next to Autumn Rose farm.
I am writing to you to let you know that we would really like to have the fence that borders the back of our property to
remain in place. It not only has an aesthetic appeal, but helps to keep extra leaves and debris from traveling. I assume in
the future, it will also deter people from crossing our property to get into the woods.
I also wanted to say that we are so very glad that Dublin is the new owner of this woods and that there will be no houses
built to destroy the natural beauty! We built on this lot because of the woods and we are happy that it is remaining so.
Thank you for your work and attention to this matter.
Mark and Katy Cripe
Claudia D. Flusxk
From: Ted Oiler<ted oil er@eliteg lobalrecruiting coma
Sent Tuesday, May 08,2018 604 PM
To Cathy K OeRosa
Q: Claudia O. Husak Bob Clawson
Subjects Re: Fencing behind property on Park Mill Drive and Bishop Crossing
Thank you so muchl. l appreciate ltl.
Ted Oiler
Managing Partner
Elite Glob al Recruiting
614 598 4424
ELITE GLOBAL RECRUITING
www.EliteGlobalRecruitlng.mm
V IBE �N
From: "Cathy K. DeRow" <CDeRosa@dublin.oh.us>
Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 5'.52 PM
To: Ted Oiler <Tetl.Oiler@EliteG lobalRecruiting. com>
Be- "Claudia D. Husak" <chusak@dublin.oh.us>, Bob Clawson <bobdawsonl@gmail. com>
Subject Re'. Fencing behind property on Park Mill Drive and Bishop Crossing
Mr Oiler,
Thank you for sending this nate. Claudia will ensure that the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission receive It
prior to the meeting.
Enjoy the lovely evening,
Cathy
On May 8, 2018, at 1:43 PM, Ted Oiler <Ted.OilerPEliteGlobalRecmitine.com> wrote:
Hello, Ms. Husak and Ms. Dense, my name Is Ted Oiler and I am the property owner and resident at
6638 Park Mill Drive Dublin, OH 43016.
I was writing you In favor of keeping the fence behind our properties. This fence adds a great deal value
and ascetics to our neighborhood. My specific property is wedge shaped and l have a very long section
offence behind By property.
This fence adds a beautiful backdrop to By property and would like to see it roma in. There is
considerable wildlife In the woods (a large herd of deer and I have also seen a number of fax and
coyotes as well) and this fence has helped keep them from encroaching into my yard and from people
into their habitat. I am concerned that removing it will increase the likelihood of an unwanted
interaction between wildlife and my family pet and/or my children.
Also because of the unique positioning of my house and my large side yard, removing the fence will
potentially invite unwanted traffic through my yard to access the wooded area.
Your thoughtful considerations to allowing this fence to remain would be greatly appreciated. Please
feel free to share this email with others.
I have included some pictures of the fence and my property.
Thank you!
<imagel.jpeg>
<image2.jpeg>
<imagel.jpeg>
Thank you.
Ted Oiler
614.598.4424