Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 052-17
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc. Ordinance No. 52-17 RECORD OF ORDINANCES Form No. 30043 Passed . 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 2.9 ACRES FROM PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (OAK PARK, SUBAREA D) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (OAK PARK, SUBAREA D) FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT TO PERMIT THE CONVERSION OF 36 TOWNHOME UNITS IN SIX BUILDINGS TO 20 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS WITHIN AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (CASE 17-0282/PDP/PP/FDP/FP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description, Exhibit A), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of -the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance the.1re within. Section 3. This Ordipance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest peAod allowed by la>4/" d this i! � da djof 2017. ayor - Pfesidir4� officer ATTESIT: Clerk of Council PASSED SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 [VOTE 7-01 WITH ADDITIONALCONDITION THAT BY MAY 1, 2018 THE APPLICANT HAVE THE DIRT PILE LOCATED ON RESERVE F HAULED AWAY AND RESERVE F GRADED AND SEEDED Office of the Cloty Manager CURY oil"' jyj"%ublin 5200 Emerald it Parkway * Dublin OH 43017-1090 I Phone: 614-410-4400 * Fax: 614-410-4490 The Oak Park PUD comprises approximately 61 acres of land categorized into five subareas (Subareas A, B, C, D, and E) with separate development standards. Council approved the PUD rezoning in November 2006, to include four subareas that were residential (Subareas A -D) and one Subarea that is commercial (Subarea Q. Section 153.053(D)(4) of the Zoning Code outlines the procedures for determining the expiratio of a Planned Development District. The provision states that,, in the event any one of thre outcomes is met, the City may begin procedures to rezone the property to the zoning district i place prior to the planned development district or to another appropriate zoning district. Th three outcomes listed in this section are as follows: I Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, Subarea D — Rezoning September 7, 2017 Page 2f 4 The commercial Subarea E is considered a future phase of the Oak Park PUD because it was not in the first phase. Because of the progress on initial residential Subareas A -D, the progress on the remainder of the PUD (commercial Subarea E) is not considered discontinued and does not trigger the City (per Code) to begin City -initiated rezoning proceedings for commercial Subarea E. Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, Subarea D — Rezoning September 7, 2017 Page 3 of 4 City. The remaining ±4 acres is maintained by the Master Homeowners Association and includes the community center, interior open spaces, and landscape features proposed with Subarea D. Listed in the table below is an estimated annual cost for open space maintenance, based on the City's contracted standards for each item. During the review of this ordinance, City Council expressed concern regarding the potential commercial development located within Subarea E of the Oak Park PUD. At the initial rezoning, the development was intended to act as a mixed-use subdivision containing a mixture of housing options in addition to a small-scale commercial development serving the needs of the Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, Subarea D — Rezoning September 7, 2017 Page 4 of 4 Staff recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 52-17 at the second reading/public hearing on September 11, 2017. Staff also recommends City Council approval of the Preliminary and Final Plats at the hearing on September 11,, 20174 W� 3 O37'-0" 1035 ESTIMA TE OF QUA Tl TIES /TEM TOTAL UNIT DESCRIPTION 25'-O SPEC LUMP SUM WA 7ER QUALITY OUTLET STRUCTURE 12 =0" PA MNG SECTION 4'-O" 4'-0" 24 =0" PA MNG SEC77ON ROADWA Y 201 LUMP SUM CLEARING & GRUBBING 203 17445 CY EXCA VA 77ON INCLUDING EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION 204 1965 SY COMPACTED SUBGRADE (B/KEPA TH) 30J 4487 TONS 3" BI TUM/NOUS AGGREGA TE BASE 304 4487 CY 6" AGGREGA TE BASE 304 328 CY 6" AGGREGA TE BASE (B/KEPA TH) 3041045 802 LF AGGREGATE BASE WIGE07EX77LE FABRIC (see underdrain detail this sheet) 404 273 TONS 2.5" ASPHAL T CONCRETE (BIKEPA TH) * 448 1870 TONS 1.25" ASPHAL T CONCRETE * 448 2618 TONS 1.75" ASPHAL T CONCRETE 605 19830 LF 4" PIPE SUB DRAIN 608 45 EACH CURB RAMP 608 1793 SY 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 609 7740 LF 18" STRAIGHT CURB 609 10556 LF CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 659 23028 SY SEEDING & MULCHING (R/W) FIRE HYDRANT, TYPE B 12'-0" PA DING SEC77ON 4=O 4'-0" 12'-0" PA MNG SEC 7701V FUTURE PARKING12" 12" 12" 12" FUTURE PARKING* 7 -0 " 6" STORM SEWER 516 23 LF 1" PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER 601 72 CY ROCK CHANNEL PRO TEC770N, TYPE "C" w/ FABRIC FIL TER 604 1 EACH MANHOLE, TYPE "A ", CLASS "A" (AA -S100) 604 7 EACH MANHOLE, TYPE "A ", CLASS "B" (AA -5100) 604 3 EACH MANHOLE, TYPE "A'; CLASS "C" (AA -S100) 604 2 EACH MANHOLE, TYPE "B", CLASS "D" (AA -S101) 604 1 EACH MANHOLE, TYPE "B", CLASS "E" (AA -S101) 604 40 EACH CURB AND GUTTER INLET (AA -S125) w/ BICYCLE SAFETY GRATE 604 24 EACH CATCH BASIN (AA -S133) w/ BICYCLE SAFETY GRATE 604 1 EACH CA TCH BASIN (ODOT 2-2A) w/ BICYCLE SAFETY GRA TE 604 19 EACH CATCH BASIN (ODOT 2-3) w/ BICYCLE SAFETY GRATE 604 14 EACH HEADWALL (AA -S168) W/STONE FACING ON EXPOSED SURFACES 604 5 EACH HEADWALL (AA -S168) 901 225 LF 8" STORM SEWER OF DRAIN) 901 1611 LF 12" STORM SEWER 901 1018 LF 12" STORM SEWER W/CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 901 640 LF 15" STORM SEWER 901 574 LF 15" STORM SEWER W/CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 901 421 LF 15" STORM SEWER W/RUBBER GASKET JOINTS 901 795 LF 18" STORM SEWER 901 163 LF 18" STORM SEWER W/CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 901 23 LF 21" STORM SEWER 901 1768 LF 24" STORM SEWER 901 ...,. 311 LF i r- 24" STORM SEWER W/CONCRETE ENCASEMENT '7A" CTnOA/ CrU/A-Q W/Q1/RRP-Q ('d gKFT ./n/NTS W� 3 O37'-0" 1035 86' R/W (Extended) 30" STORM SEWER InW 56 LF 25'-O SPEC LUMP SUM WA 7ER QUALITY OUTLET STRUCTURE 12 =0" PA MNG SECTION 4'-O" 4'-0" 24 =0" PA MNG SEC77ON SUM MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER, AS PER PLAN B/KEPATH 1, EARTH R 6, 12" 6" 12" 12 6" VEMENTUNDERDRA/N ca (o ) 9'_O" SIDEWALK Curb Box Side) �n 252 STRAIGHT 18" PROFILE GRADE 7'-O' SLOPE 3/16 "/ET. --• SLOPE. 3/16 "/FT. -y CITY OF DUBLIN CONCRETE ^ I `d l 3/16 "/FT. � 5% 5Z .. - -- ----� CONCRETE CURB l Per 2000 Dr. A 3/16 "/FT. SLOPE. • J-1 MAX. LF ODOT Item 707.31 802 EARTH '` 6" VALVE W/STANDARD VALVE BOX (INCL. HYD. VALVES) 802 20 EACH NO. 57 803 1 f 2 3 4 5 AGGREGA TE 805 55 EACH 4" SUB DRAIN 805 53 EACH ODOT Item 707.31 805 1 EACH or 707.33 805 2 TYPICAL 44' B B SECT7O 86' R/W 6" WA TER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE 805 1 NOT TO SCALE 8" WATER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE 809 5 50' FIRE HYDRANT, TYPE A 809 �R/W 25 =0" 25'--O" EACH FIRE HYDRANT, TYPE B 12'-0" PA DING SEC77ON 4=O 4'-0" 12'-0" PA MNG SEC 7701V FUTURE PARKING12" 12" 12" 12" FUTURE PARKING* 7 -0 " 6" 6" R 6" M �o 8" EACH �0 Water Main tl 18" CONCRETE CURB = EAR TH ^ 3/76'%FT I 3/16"/FT 5X 5X -5=X I1zIgo ^ Per 2000 Dr. A �n `° 3/16"/FT. alp I VARIES EACH STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EN7RANCE - 38 EACH BEA VER DAM TA AJ 42 4" SUB DRAIN i' EAR TH NO. 207 1 2 4 5 LF ODOT Item 707.31 R AGGREGA 1F FUTURE STRAIGHT 18" t P R' h t) (P blic) = N •� N or 707.33 o g .� FU TURF STRAIGHT 18" CONCRETE CURB 7'-0" Water Main i l i i I I 1 1 1 oNN N N N CONCRETE CURB 901 1035 -4 W Q� 30" STORM SEWER �W 56 LF 25'-O SPEC LUMP SUM WA 7ER QUALITY OUTLET STRUCTURE 1' 4' 7'--O" MIN. 2'-1 SUM MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER, AS PER PLAN SIDEWALK 1, EARTH R Geotexi/e Fabric Fibertex TYPICAL PA SLOPE 3/18 /FT SLOPE.• � 3/1, 6 /FT v VEMENTUNDERDRA/N ca (o ) 9'_O" SIDEWALK Curb Box Side) Slope: 252 3.• 1 Max. 7'-O' PERMANANT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT, TYPE I Water Main 7 CITY OF DUBLIN CONCRETE COMBINA77ON CURB & GUTTER - RD -02 NO. 57 AGGREGA 7E 801 4" SUB DRAIN LF ODOT Item 707.31 802 or 707.33 901 1035 LF 30" STORM SEWER SPEC 56 LF CON -SPAN BRIDGE SYSTEM W/HEADWALLS SPEC LUMP SUM WA 7ER QUALITY OUTLET STRUCTURE SPEC LUMP SUM MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER, AS PER PLAN 4'-O" 4'-0 f' 1" Geotexi/e Fabric Fibertex TYPICAL PA Min. Clear 21" 14=O" VEMENTUNDERDRA/N ca (o ) 9'_O" SIDEWALK WA TERL/NE 252 6 CY PERMANANT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT, TYPE I 801 1214 LF 6" DUCTILE IRON WA 7ERLINE W/APPUR7ENANCES CLASS 53 801 6703 LF 8" DUCTILE IRON WATERLINE W/APPURTENANCES CLASS 53 802 27 EACH 6" VALVE W/STANDARD VALVE BOX (INCL. HYD. VALVES) 802 20 EACH 8" VA VE W/STANDARD VA VE BOX 803 1 EACH 12" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE & VALVE 805 55 EACH 3/4" WATER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE (SHORT) 805 53 EACH 3/4" WATER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE (LONG) 805 1 EACH 1-1/2" WA TER SER VICE TAP, COMPLETE (COMMUNI TY CENTER) 805 2 EACH 6" WA TER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE 805 1 EACH 8" WATER SERVICE TAP, COMPLETE 809 5 EACH FIRE HYDRANT, TYPE A 809 18 EACH FIRE HYDRANT, TYPE B Slope: 57 EARTH 3.• 1 Max. 7 -0 " f 2 3 4 LIGH77NG SPEC 2 EACH S7REET LIGHT COMPLE7F Water Main = SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET SEDIMENT CONTROL OUAN7777ES 207 1 EACH STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EN7RANCE Spec. 38 EACH BEA VER DAM Sec. 42 EACH DANDY BAG 207 1831 LF SEDIMENT FENCE t P R' h t) (P blic) W The Quantities Have Been Established As A Means For The City To Estimate The Necessary ueve/opmenr oFees. The Contractor Shall Be Solely Responsible For Determining The Required Bid Quantities Necessary For The Completion Of The Plan Improvements. Q * Denotes Ohio Department of Transportation Construction and Material Specifications (Latest Edition). Al/ other items refer to City of Columbus Construction and Material Specifications. TYPICAL 32' BIB SEC170N 50' R/W NOT TO SCALE 50'/w '-0" PA MNG SEC77ON 14'-6" GRADING PROFILE GRADEA 0� ^ 3/16 /FT. N 3/16 "/FT. TYPICAL 28 BIB SECTION C /?, /W NOT TO SCALE Oak Pork Boulevard (Public) Sta, 0+00.00 to Sta. 4+89.84 YZ Q� 3 W� 10=6' 1' 6'--6" 4' SIDEWALK SLOPE. SLOPE: p 3/1._ 6 /FT 3/16 "/FT SLOPE 3:1 MAX. Pleasan t Drive (Public) Oak Kew A venue North (Public) Oak Kew A venue South (Public) Greenland Place (Public) No Sidewalk Left: Sta. 7+23.89 to Sta. 9+23.91 Oak Meadow Drive: (Public) Sta, 0+00.00 to Sta. 1+77.76 Sta. 10+3&76 to Sta. 21+34.99 No Sidewalk Right.Sta. 0+00.00 to Sta. 1+77.76 W 49=O" W� i 13-0" 8-O" 1' 1' 12" B/KEPA 7H 6" R SLOPE- SLOPE: i 3/16 %FT. 3/16 %FT. ---- Slope.• Water 16'-6" 3.• 1 Max. Main Oak Pork Boulevard (Public) Sta. 4+89.84 to Sta. 6+55.80 24'-O" ALLEY 12'-0" 12" PA MNG SEC770AI= GRAD/NG SEC77ON 6" °p PROFILE GRADE co 3/16 -11F 7. 1 2 3 4 5 STRAIGHT 18" NO. 57 AGGREGATE �r= CONCRE7F CURB 4" SUB DRAIN I ^ Per 2000 Dr. A ODOT Item 707.31 N - R N I o or 707.33 Acorn Lane - Sta. 2+92.93 to Sta. 4+50.04 Chinkopin Oak Lone - sto o+00.00 to Sta. 1+03.54 Shumord Oak Lone - Sta. 1+7783 to Sta 2+81.37 Bur Oak Lone - Sta. 3+19.94 to Sta. 4+50.04 TYPICAL 24' BIB PR/VA TE ALLEY SECTION NOT TO SCALE rk' /W Varies c Q W56' Q� 25'-0" po po po po o 0 0 6" 4" Sub Drain, OOOT 31-0 f' 10'-6" 14=6" GRAD/NG SEC77ON 23'-O" PA MNG SEC77ON 4'-O" 4'-0 f' 1" Geotexi/e Fabric Fibertex TYPICAL PA Min. Clear 21" 14=O" VEMENTUNDERDRA/N ca (o ) 9'_O" SIDEWALK 6" 4' 6'--6" F21,18,PARKING �°0 SIDEWALK 1' EARTH N � \ ^ PROFILE GRADE \ "� \ SLOPE.• SLOPE.•SLOPE-3 SLOP 3/16"/FT. 3/16 "/FT. d I 3/J6 "/FT. N 3/8 "/FT. v i 3/16 %FT. Ni 16"/FT. / 3/16"/FT. �--- Curb Box SLOPE. J. 1 MAX. (W. M. Side) Slope: 57 EARTH 3.• 1 Max. 7 -0 " f 2 3 4 5NO. PA DEMENT UNDERDRAIN AGGREGA TF = Water Main = SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET 4" SUB DRAIN � �^° '& -STRAIGHT STRA/GHT 18" CITY OF DUBLIN CONCRETE COMB/NA77ON CURB & GUT7ER 707.31 ^ h'� ODOT Item CONCRETE CURB ^ N i or 707.33 ^ l � � ►!� Per 2000 Dr. A RD -02 NO. 57 AGGREGA 7E 4" SUB DRAIN ODOT Item 707.31 = QN N Primrose Court (Parking Left) (Public) or 707.33 t P R' h t) (P blic) Snowdrop Cour (a ing ig u TYPICAL 28' SECTION PLUS PARK/NG SONE SIDES Oak Meadow Drive: (Parking Right) (Public) 56' R/W Sta. 1+77 76 to Sta. 10+M 76 NOT To SCALE 24-0" FUTURE PARKING * FUTURE PARKING 12'-0" 12 =0" 6 a 6" 6 6 PROFILE GRADE EARTH " I 'IF a 3 16" FT VARIES 3/16 /FT. a0 3/16 T. co �- 7EMPORARYEAR7N �, NO. 57 LUI STRAIGHT 18" _ " `D ° CONCRETE CURB : t �47 3 4 5 c^o AGGREGATE R R S1RA/GHT 18 Per 2000 Or. A 4" SUB DRAIN CONCREIF CURB \� Water I OOOT Item 707.31 ^ Per 2000 Or. A Ill FUTURE STRAIGHT 18' I I I= o or 707.33 N Main CONCRETE CURB R NN o TYPICAL PRI VA TE 24 SECTION PLUS PARKING (BOTH SIDES) Ooktree Drive North (Private) Ooktree Drive South (Private) NOT TO SCALE 20'-O" ALLEY 9'-O" 10=O" 12 PA MNG SEC77ON GRAD/NG SEC77ON 6" R PROFILE GRADE 00 /' 3/16 "/FT. Q Uj STRAIGHT 18" NO. 57 AGGREGA TF R CONCRETE CURB 4" SUB DRAIN Per 2000 Dr. A ODOT Item 707.31 � -IR O W6 O or 707.33 Acorn Lone - Sta. 0+00.00 to Sta. 2+92.93 Chinkopin Oak Lone - Sta, 1+03.54 to Sta, 2+81.37 Shumord Oak Lone - sta. 0+00.00 to sta. 1+7783 Bur Oak Lone - Sta: 0+00.00 to Sta. 3+19.94 TYPICAL 20' BIB PR/VA TE ALLEY SECTION NOT TO SCALE PA VEMENT LEGEND �i 1-1/4" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE 1 PG. 64-22 MEDIUM TRAFFIC ITEM 448 0 1-3/4" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIA TE COURSE TYPE 2 PG. 64-22 MEDIUM T TAFFIC ITEM 448 Q 3" BI TUM/NOUS AGGREGA TE BASE, I TEM 301 4� 6" AGGREGA TE BASE, I TEM 304 0 SUBGRADE COMPACTION I7EM 204 Pavement Section Geotexile Fabric Overlapped on I Top of Coarse Aggregate. 0 o .- N a� N N U U) o z t2 N Q1 ° z =, co U o 0 LU 5 LU O 5_ O Icr LU o Q Z Q azo (L oQL O 2Cr Q to O U u) LU LU J a_ G NQS - E co v c ) p04 > e� n 0 i( 0 C� a : x C: O 0 FLU x a = 0 0 o > C:0Ln i v iQ^ a)a coo > �o WwLo� U) , z O z L o > L LU i U 0 1 SHEET 3 * CONFIGURA TION OF FUTURE PARKING WILL BE DE7FRMINED AT 77ME OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RESERVES A & D. 34 00 Varies O ,0 0 00 0.p�0,, 0p�0 0p0 0 �t�`b b b 6" min. No. 57 Aggregate po po po po o 0 0 6" 4" Sub Drain, OOOT ° 0 ° Item 707.31 or 707.33 1" Geotexi/e Fabric Fibertex TYPICAL PA Min. Clear 21" Grade 150 or Similar DETAIL VEMENTUNDERDRA/N ca (o ) 0 o .- N a� N N U U) o z t2 N Q1 ° z =, co U o 0 LU 5 LU O 5_ O Icr LU o Q Z Q azo (L oQL O 2Cr Q to O U u) LU LU J a_ G NQS - E co v c ) p04 > e� n 0 i( 0 C� a : x C: O 0 FLU x a = 0 0 o > C:0Ln i v iQ^ a)a coo > �o WwLo� U) , z O z L o > L LU i U 0 1 SHEET 3 * CONFIGURA TION OF FUTURE PARKING WILL BE DE7FRMINED AT 77ME OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RESERVES A & D. 34 Income & Expense Statement 31 -Jul -17 OPCA Oak Park Community Association INCOME Current Month Year to Date 4013 Homeowner Association Dues 5,418.00 38,070.54 4060 Contribution to Reserve upon Sale 0.00 1,624.00 4100 Late Fee 50.00 100.00 4140 Interest 46.02 228.34 TOTAL INCOME EXPENSE 5040 Printing/Copies 5042 Postage 5045 Office Expense 5055 Late Fees to MRE 5059 Contribution To Reserves Upon Sale 5065 Legal Professional Fee 5070 Accounting Professional Fee 5075 Reserve Fund Contribution 5200 Interior Maintenance 5220 Electric Repair 5230 Plumbing Repair 5285 Equipment Maintenance 5300 Exterior Maintenance 5333 Pond Maintenance 5335 Landscaping 6100 Management Fee _ TOTAL EXPENSE NET INCOME UNALLOCATED PREPAYS 8000 Unallocated Prepays 5,514.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,248.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.40 333.67 1,659.07 3,854.95 75.00 Budget 59, 904.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,022.88 59,904.00 3.60 41.60 7.11 97.76 8.60 300.00 200.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 230.00 225.00 8,736.00 45,304.93 0.00 600.00 0.00 600.00 0.00 171.00 161.25 1,115.00 0.00 100.00 1,298.98 0.00 729.82 7,140.27 2,278.79 3,708.44 15,854.15 59,904.00 24,168.73 0.00 707.00 Condo Statement -FRW 8131173:18pm Page1of2 rentmanager.com-property management systems rev.3573 ACCOUNT BALANCES 1156 OPCA - AAB 12.22.16 CD 1157 OPCA - AAB 10.25.17 CD 1456 OPCA - AAB Operating 1556 OPCA - AAB Reserve 1562 OPCA - 5/3 Reserve TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS YF,1R Myers J real escare 1221 Grandview Ave. Columbus, OH 43212 Office: 614-486-2933 Fax: 614-486-1001 e-mail: info@myersrealty.com myersrealty.com 20,150.55 10,033.26 93,632.63 27,888.74 43.11 151,748.29 Condo Statement - FRW 813117 3:18pm Page 2 of 2 rentmanager. com -property management systems rev.3573 General Ledger Property: OPCA Oak Park Community Association Detail From 7/1/2017 to 7/31/2017 (cash basis) Date Type Reference Description Debit Credit Balance 4013 Homeowner Association Dues (Income) 32,652.54 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0217655600 Sreenivasa Puli 79750A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 32,748.54 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0011316743 Ravi Rudm Raju 7988PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 32,844.54 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0011315460 Sangamesh Hubt8065PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 46.00 32,890.54 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0011320734 Altaf Shaik 8073PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 84.00 32,974.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000001424 Larry & Brenda H 80670A Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,070.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000002188 Kathy Bartunek 80270A Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,166.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0491345732 Vanida Serna 79590A Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,262.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000407796 Nicole Drobny 8033PL Payment from previous pe 25.00 33,287.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000750487 Nicole Drobny 8033PL Payment from previous pe 71.00 33,358.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0010990231 Kiran Bethamche 8046PL Payment from previous pe 28.00 33,386.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000005017 Saravanan Shanr8009PL Payment from previous pe 67.00 33,453.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011103204 Sreekanth Basire 7007PR Payment from previous pe 12.00 33,465.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011117334 Kiran Bethamche 8046PL Payment from previous pe 68.00 33,533.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000005020 Saravanan Shanr 8009PL Payment from previous pe 29.00 33,562.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 15582 Tom Deschler 7023GR Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,658.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011171084 Altaf Shaik 8073PL Payment from previous pe 12.00 33,670.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011184050 Raghu Krishna G 7980PL Payment from previous pe 25.00 33,695.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011181269 Sugunakar Pendr 80430A Payment from previous pe 23.00 33,718.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011223047 Sreekanth Basire 7007PR Payment from previous pe 84.00 33,802.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000009129 Mohammed & Sh 7055GR Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,898.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0507067277 Wei Cai 7063GR Payment from previous pe 96.00 33,994.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011269108 Rajesh Kiran Kari80070A Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,090.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000006535 Srinivas Akula 79950A Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,186.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011282709 Melvis Housema 7134SN Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,282.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011300226 Narahari Nemalla 71730A Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,378.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011304455 Sudhir Suresh DI 71650V Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,474.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011304456 Tingting Wang 7972PL Payment from previous pe 92.00 34,566.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0000000184 Houchun Hu 8030PL Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,662.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011304159 Konstantin Shilo 80640A Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,758.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0510996835 Ying Zhou 8041 PL Payment from previous pe 96.00 34,854.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011309784 Sugunakar Pendr 80430A Payment from previous pe 73.00 34,927.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0011312121 Raghu Krishna G 7980PL Payment from previous pe 71.00 34,998.54 07/01/2017 PYALOC 0842800000 Melanie Hawkey 79830A Payment from previous pe 96.00 35,094.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011327418 Sung Ho Yi 7039GR Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,190.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350886 Brad & Emily Bec 7047GR Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,286.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350887 Gopi Uppalapati 71570V Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,382.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350888 Yingchang Han 71740A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,478.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350889 Kavitha Edula 7181 OV Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,574.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350890 Sailendra Sunkar 71890A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,670.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011350891 Jayapmkash Bho 7979PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,766.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011356582 Rama Garneni 7987PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,862.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011328163 Steven Jennings 79910A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 35,958.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0000001000 Mike & Ann Quim 7995PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,054.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011333031 Daniel Fetsko 80350A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,150.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011333032 Timothy Linn 80480A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,246.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011333033 Marc Froebel 80560A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,342.54 07/03/2017 CHPAID 0011333034 Andy Fernandez 8062PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,438.54 07/05/2017 CHPAID 0011379735 Ashish & Deepike 7956PL Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,534.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0011391905 Bhavani Chadara 7015GR Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,630.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0011391906 Sailaja Maganti 7031GR Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,726.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0512041388 Satya Karthik Sor 7126SN Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 6/1 21.00 36,747.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0512041388 Satya Karthik Sor 7126SN Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 75.00 36,822.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0011391907 Stephen Lucas 7142SN Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 36,918.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0000001779 Kevin Force 71900A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,014.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0613303800 Anand Padmanat 7951 OA Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 i 96.00 37,110.54 07/06/2017 CHPAID 0000001423 Kenny Youn 79670A Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,206.54 General Ledger 8131173:18pm Pagelof4 rentmanager.com-property management systems rev.3573 Date Type Reference Description Debit Credit Balance 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0011407290 Srinivasulu Chap16999PR Alloc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,302.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0000909969 Denise Skingle 7071GR AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,398.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0011407291 Mei Hong 71 10S AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,494.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0011407292 Aroub Shanaah 7118SN AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,590.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0000000232 Sean Flanders 7963PL AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 6/1 75.00 37,665.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0000000232 Sean Flanders 7963PL AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 21.00 37,686.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0011407756 Sunita Chaudhar8040OA AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,782.54 07/10/2017 CHPAID 0011407757 Anil Kumar Burra 8059OA AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,878.54 07/11/2017 CHPAID 0011413739 Narendra Amirine 7971 PL AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 37,974.54 07/12/2017 CHPAID 0011416588 Venkata Rayapat 8051 OA AIIoc to'HOA' Ch date: 7/1 96.00 38,070.54 Totals for Homeowner Association Di Beg Bal: 32,652.54 Activity: 5,418.00 0.00 5,418.00 38,070.54 4060 Contribution to Reserve upon Sale (Income) 1,624.00 No activity in the period jjjjh� 1,624.00 Totals for Contribution to Reserve up Beg Bal: 1,624.00 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,624.00 4100 Late Fee (Income) 50.00 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0011315460 Sangamesh Hubk 8065PL AIIoc to'LC' Ch date: 12/11 25.00 75.00 07/01/2017 CHPAID 0011315460 Sangamesh Hubk 8065PL AIIoc to'LC' Ch date: 1/16( 25.00 100.00 Totals for Late Fee Beg Bal: 50.00 Activity: 50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00 4140 Interest (Income) 182.32 07/05/2017 JOURNL J6921 June AAB CD 10.25.17 5.11 187.43 07/05/2017 JOURNL J6954 June AAB CD 12.22.16 14.53 201.96 07/05/2017 JOURNL J6954 June AAB Reserve 4.45 206.41 07/05/2017 JOURNL J6955 June AAB Operating 7.40 213.81 07/08/2017 JOURNL J6978 AAB 12.22 16 CD June interest 14.53 228.34 Totals for Interest Beg Bal: 182.32 Activity: 46.02 0.00 46.02 228.34 8000 Unallocated Prepays (Other Income) 782.00 07/01/2017 UNALOC 0011320734 Altaf Shaik 8073PL Unallocated prepay 16.00 798.00 07/01/2017 UNALOC 0217655800 Mohammed & Sh 7055GR Unallocated prepay 96.00 894.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000001424 Larry & Brenda H 8067OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 798.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000002188 Kathy Bartunek 8027OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 702.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0491345732 Vanida Serna 7959OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 606.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000407796 Nicole Drobny 8033PL Prepay from previous peri( 25.00 581.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000750487 Nicole Drobny 8033PL Prepay from previous peri( 71.00 510.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0010990231 Kiran Bethamche 8046PL Prepay from previous peri( 28.00 482.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000005017 Saravanan Shanr 8009PL Prepay from previous peri( 67.00 415.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011103204 Sreekanth Basire 7007PR Prepay from previous peri( 12.00 403.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011117334 Kiran Bethamche 8046PL Prepay from previous peri( 68.00 335.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000005020 Saravanan Shanr 8009PL Prepay from previous peri( 29.00 306.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 15582 Tom Deschler 7023GR Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 210.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011171084 Altaf Shaik 8073PL Prepay from previous peri( 12.00 198.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011184050 Raghu Krishna G 7980PL Prepay from previous peri( 25.00 173.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011181269 Sugunakar Pendr 8043OA Prepay from previous peri( 23.00 150.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011223047 Sreekanth Basire 7007PR Prepay from previous peri( 84.00 66.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000009129 Mohammed & Sh 7055GR Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -30.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0507067277 Wei Cai 7063GR Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -126.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011269108 Rajesh Kiran Kar(8007OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -222.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000006535 Srinivas Akula 7995OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -318.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011282709 Melvis Housema 7134SN Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -414.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011300226 Narahari Nemalla 7173OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -510.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011304455 Sudhir Suresh DI 7165OV Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -606.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011304456 Tingting Wang 7972PL Prepay from previous peri( 92.00 -698.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0000000184 Houchun Hu 8030PL Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -794.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011304159 Konstantin Shilo 8064OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 _ -890.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0510996835 Ying Zhou 8041 PL Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -986.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011309784 Sugunakar Pendr 8043OA Prepay from previous peri( i 73.00 -1,059.00 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0011312121 Raghu Krishna G 7980PL Prepay from previous peri( 71.00 -1,130.00 General Ledger 813117 3:18pm Page 2 of 4 rentmanager.com -property management systems rev.3573 Date Type Reference Description Debit Credit Balance 07/01/2017 PPALOC 0842800000 Melanie Hawkey 7983OA Prepay from previous peri( 96.00 -1,226.00 07/03/2017 UNALOC 0011350885 Sreekanth Basire 7007PR Unallocated prepay 100.00 -1,126.00 07/03/2017 UNALOC 0511954499 Wei Cai 7063GR Unallocated prepay 96.00 -1,030.00 07/05/2017 UNALOC 0011382524 Kiran Bethamche 8046PL Unallocated prepay 97.00 -933.00 07/07/2017 UNALOC 0000005027 Saravanan Shanr8009PL Unallocated prepay 96.00 -837.00 07/11/2017 UNALOC 0011413788 Rajesh Kiran Kar(8007OA Unallocated prepay 96.00 -741.00 07/13/2017 UNALOC 0000006543 Srinivas Akula 7995OA Unallocated prepay 96.00 -645.00 07/17/2017 UNALOC 0011427050 Melvis Housema 7134SN Unallocated prepay 96.00 -549.00 07/24/2017 UNALOC 0000000188 Houchun Hu 8030PL Unallocated prepay 96.00 -453.00 07/25/2017 UNALOC 0000211959 Nicole Drobny 8033PL Unallocated prepay 200.00 -253.00 07/26/2017 UNALOC 0011446231 Narahari Nemalla 7173OA Unallocated prepay 96.00 -157.00 07/27/2017 UNALOC 0011448769 Sudhir Suresh DI 7165OV Unallocated prepay 96.00 -61.00 07/27/2017 UNALOC 0011448770 Tingting Wang 7972PL Unallocated prepay 92.00 31.00 07/27/2017 UNALOC 0011450089 Sugunakar Pendr8043OA Unallocated prepay 96.00 127.00 07/27/2017 UNALOC 0011449692 Konstantin Shilo 8064OA Unallocated prepay 96.00 223.00 07/27/2017 UNALOC 0011450456 Altaf Shaik 8073PL Unallocated prepay 100.00 323.00 07/28/2017 UNALOC 0516162928 Ying Zhou 8041 PL Unallocated prepay 96.00 419.00 07/31/2017 UNALOC 0011457849 Sung Ho Yi 7039GR Unallocated prepay 96.00 515.00 07/31/2017 UNALOC 0011459812 Raghu Krishna G 7980PL Unallocated prepay 96.00 611.00 07/31/2017 UNALOC 0011462301 Ravi Rudm Raju 7988PL Unallocated prepay 96.00 707.00 Totals for Unallocated Prepays Beg Bal: 782.00 Activity: -75.00 2,120.00 2,045.00 707.00 5040 Printing/Copies (Expense) 3.60 No activity in the period 3.60 Totals for Printing/Copies Beg Bal: 3.60 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 5042 Postage (E)<pense) 7.11 No activity in the period = i 7.11 Totals for Postage Beg Bal: 7.11 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.11 5045 Office Expense (Expense) 8.60 No activity in the period 8.60 Totals for Office Expense Beg Bal: 8.60 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.60 5055 Late Fees to MRE (Expense) 200.00 No activity in the period 200.00 Totals for Late Fees to MRE Beg Bal: 200.00 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 5070 Accounting Professional Fee (Expense) 230.00 No activity in the period 230.00 Totals for Accounting Professional Fe Beg Bal: 230.00 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 5075 Reserve Fund Contribution (Expense) 7,488.00 07/31/2017 JOURNL J7057 7.2017 Transfer to Reserves 1,248.00 8,736.00 Totals for Reserve Fund Contribution Beg Bal: 7,488.00 Activity: 1,248.00 1,248.00 0.00 8,736.00 5333 Pond Maintenance (Expense) 1,298.98 No activity in the period i 1,298.98 Totals for Pond Maintenance Beg Bal: 1,298.98 Activity: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,298.98 5335 Landscaping (Expense) 652.42 07/13/2017 CHECK 132 Performance Landscape Group LLC 9233 77.40 729.82 Totals for Landscaping Beg Bal: 652.42 Activity: 77.40 77.40 0.00 729.82 6100 Management Fee (Expense) 1,945.12 07/25/2017 CHECK 133 t Myers Real Estate Management Managementfees: Oa 325.53 2,270.65 07/31/2017 CHECK 136 Myers Real Estate Management Catch up Managment 8.14 2,278.79 General Ledger 813117 3:18pm Page 3 of 4 rentmanager.com - property management systems rev.3573 Date Type Reference Description Debit Credit Balance Totals for Management Fee Beg Bal: 1,945.12 Activity: 333.67 333.67 0.00 2,278.79 Totals: 3,779.07 7,559.02 General Ledger 813117 3:18pm Page 4 of 4 rentmanager.com -property management systems rev.3573 Delinquency (Detail) Property: OPCA Oak Park Community Association As Of Monday July 31, 2017 indicates a past customer Customer Name Account Unit Unit Type Phone Address Amount OPCA Oak Park Community Association Satya Karthik Sonti 7071 7126SN single family 7126 Snowdrop Court 07/01/2017 Homeowner Association Due 21.00 21.00 Sean Flanders 3963 7963PL single family 330-655-0838 7963 Pleasant Drive 10/16/2016 Late Charge 25.00 11/17/2016 Late Charge 25.00 12/16/2016 Late Charge 25.00 01/16/2017 Late Charge 25.00 02/16/2017 Late Charge 25.00 06/16/2017 Late Charge 25.00 07/01/2017 Homeowner Association Due 75.00 225.00 San amesh Hubballi 6091 8065PL single family 8065 Pleasant Dr. 07/01/2017 Homeowner Association Due 50.00 50.00 Total delinquent for property: 296.00 Report Summary Customers: 3 Percent Delinquent: 5.26% Delinquent Amount: 296.00 Delinquency (Detaig 813117 3:18pm Page 1 of 1 rentmanager.com -property management systems rev.3573 Cash Flow Report OPCA Oak Park Community Association Unit: Period 7/1/2017 - 7/31/2017 OPERATING ACTIVITIES 1i"- Alliance Bank Balance at beginning of period $89,891.30 Total Income 5,400.40 Transfers from Reserves PPCA - CD 12.22.16 Total Deposits 5,400.40 Total Expense 1,659.07 Transfers to Reserves 0.00 Total Withdrawals 1,659.07 Balance at end of period $93,632.63 OPCA Cash Flow Report3 - FRW 813117 3:18pi Page 1 of 1 rentmanager. com -property management systems rev.3573 RESERVE ACTIVITIES OPCA -Alliance Bank Reserve PPCA - CD 12.22.16 Balance at beginning of period $26,636.29 Balance at beginning of period $20,136.02 Total Income 1,252.45 Total Income 0.00 Transfers from Operating 0.00 Transfers from Operating 0.00 Total Deposits 14.53 Total Deposits 1,252.45 Total Expense 0.00 Total Expense 0.00 Transfers to Operating 0.00 Transfers to Operating 0.00 Total Withdrawals 0.00 Total Withdrawals 0.00 Balance at end of period $27,888.74 Balance at end of period $20,150.55 OPCA - CD 10.25.17 Balance at beginning of period $10,028.15 Total Income 0.00 1221 Grandview Ave Transfers from Operating 0.00 Columbus, OH 43212 Total Deposits 5.11 POURgoYEAR 614-486-2933 (p) 614-486-1001 (f) Total Expense 0.00 rers yersrealty.com real estate m Transfers to Operating 0.00 Total Withdrawals 0.00 Balance at end of period $10,033.26 OPCA Cash Flow Report3 - FRW 813117 3:18pi Page 1 of 1 rentmanager. com -property management systems rev.3573 ActualBudget Fiscal Year Analysis 813117 3:18pm Page 1 of 2 rentmanager.com -property management systems rev.3573 Actual/Budget Fiscal Year Analysis Property: OPCA Oak Park Community Association Analysis for Fiscal Year 1/1/2017 - 12/31/2017 (cash basis) as of 7/31/2017 Budget REVISED ORIGINAL Actual JAN 17 FEB 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY 17 JUN 17 JUL 17 AUG 17 SEP 17 OCT 17 NOV 17 DEC 17 TOTAL BUDGET INCOME 4013 Homeowner Association 5,531.29 5,309.00 5,458.71 5,280.00 5,605.54 5,468.00 5,418.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 63,030.54 59,904.00 4060 Contribution to Reserve 1 662.71 576.00 201.29 0.00 184.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,624.00 0.00 4100 Late Fee 75.00 -121.00 71.00 -50.00 75.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 4140 Interest 15.34 22.86 26.00 30.69 43.87 43.56 46.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228.34 0.00 TOTAL INCOME 6,284.34 5,786.86 5,757.00 5,260.69 5,908.41 5,511.56 5,514.02 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 64,982.88 59,904.00 EXPENSE 5040 Printing/Copies 0.00 0.00 3.15 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 10.40 0.00 0.00 10.40 24.40 41.60 5042 Postage 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.00 2.97 2.53 0.00 0.00 24.44 0.00 0.00 24.44 55.99 97.76 5045 Office Expense 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.60 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 270.00 288.60 300.00 5055 Late Fees to MRE 50.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 5059 Contribution To Reserve. 662.71 576.00 777.29 0.00 184.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 5065 Legal Professional Fee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 5070 Accounting Professional 0.00 0.00 230.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230.00 225.00 5075 Reserve Fund Contribufi 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 1,248.00 31,576.93 45,304.93 45,304.93 5200 Interior Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 250.00 600.00 5220 Electric Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 300.00 600.00 5230 Plumbing Repair 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 171.00 171.00 171.00 5285 Equipment Maintenance 0.00 161.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 536.25 1,115.00 5300 Exterior Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 50.00 100.00 5333 Pond Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,218.35 80.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,298.98 0.00 5335 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 258.00 394.42 77.40 550.60 1,428.45 550.60 550.60 550.60 4,360.67 7,140.27 6100 Management Fee 322.29 322.29 322.29 322.29 322.29 333.67 333.67 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 314.38 3,850.69 3,708.44 TOTAL EXPENSE 2,283.00 2,382.54 2,582.34 1,570.29 3,308.61 2,068.30 1,659.07 2,237.98 3,335.67 2,237.98 2,237.98 33,717.75 59,621.51 59,904.00 OTHER INC & EXP 8000 Unallocated Prepays 1,501.29 -463.29 472.00 -625.00 660.00 -763.00 -75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 707.00 0.00 TOTAL OTHER INC & EXP 1,501.29 -463.29 472.00 -625.00 660.00 -763.00 -75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 707.00 0.00 NET INCOME 5,502.63 2,941.03 3,646.66 3,065.40 3,259.80 2,680.26 3,779.95 2,754.02 1,656.33 2,754.02 2,754.02 -28,725.75 6,068.37 0.00 ActualBudget Fiscal Year Analysis 813117 3:18pm Page 1 of 2 rentmanager.com -property management systems rev.3573 NET INCOME SUMMARY Income Expense Other Income & Expense NET INCOME 40000 20000 0 -20000 -40000 Jan 17 Feb 17 Mar 17 Apr 17 May 17 Jun 17 Jul 17 Aug 17 Sep 17 Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 ❑ Income Income A Expense Actual A Net Income 7000 HBudget 6000 5000 4000 REVISED ORIGINAL JAN 17 FEB 17 MAR 17 APR 17 MAY 17 JUN 17 JUL 17 AUG 17 SEP 17 OCT 17 NOV 17 DEC 17 TOTAL BUDGET 6,284.34 5,786.86 5,757.00 5,260.69 5,908.41 5,511.56 5,514.02 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 4,992.00 64,982.88 59,904.00 2,283.00 2,382.54 2,582.34 1,570.29 3,308.61 2,068.30 1,659.07 2,237.98 3,335.67 2,237.98 2,237.98 33,717.75 59,621.51 59,904.00 1,501.29 -463.29 472.00 -625.00 660.00 -763.00 -75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 707.00 0.00 5,502.63 2,941.03 3,646.66 3,065.40 3,259.80 2,680.26 3,779.95 2,754.02 1,656.33 2,754.02 2,754.02 -28,725.75 6,068.37 0.00 Jan 17 Feb 17 Mar 17 Apr 17 May 17 Jun 17 Jul 17 Aug 17 Sep 17 Oct 17 Nov 17 Dec 17 ❑ Income Income A Expense A Net Income 7000 6000 5000 4000 50000 0 Expense Actual/Budget Fiscal Year Analysis 813117 3:18pm Page 2 of 2 rentmanager. com -property management systems rev.3573 Oak Park Alleys Condition Evaluation September 5, 2017 Background Oaktree Drive N and S, Acorn Lane, Chinkapin Oak Lane, Shumard Oak Lane, and Bur Oak Lane are privately maintained streets in the Oak Park subdivision. The streets are 24' wide with concrete curbs and total 2,693 feet (0.51 miles) in length. The neighborhood was developed in 2007 (06 -007 -RES) and the existing roadway composition is 6" of asphalt on a 6" aggregate base. This design is in accordance with Dublin's current standard pavement section for private streets which is 6" of asphalt on a 6" aggregate base as noted in Drawing Number RD -04. Condition Evaluation Since these streets ae privately maintained streets, the City of Dublin does not perform a routine condition survey of these assets. A field visit was performed on September 5, 2017 in order to obtain the following visual observations. The pavement is in satisfactory condition. There are pavement cracks, particularly in the centerline joint, small potholes, and areas of raveling. The surface of the asphalt has exposed aggregate and some of the cracks have vegetation growing; this is primarily due to the very low traffic on the streets. The curbs are generally in good condition with no significant areas of excessive cracking or damage. There is significant vegetation growing between the curb and pavement in some areas. Additionally, the curb inlets appear to be in good condition. Estimated Work The estimated work in the near future is primarily preventive; of which would include a few areas of shallow asphalt patching and crack sealing. Long term repairs would include a shallow mill and fill in the 8 to 10 -year range. The following estimates are in 2017 dollars and do not include any contingencies. Work Crack Sealing & Patching Pavement Mill & Fill When Estimate 1-2 years $10,000 8-10 years $120,000 Left: Typical pavement condition. Right: asphalt raveling dir Left: vegetation along curb. Right: typical pavement condition OAK PARK .,.....,eu.,,.u.,,,,.e..,ee..o...e...,, .EDGEcRoua .o DEVELOPMENT DATA z Q Gross Area: 61.39 Acres I — —/Commercial. / Floor Area 39,700 Square Fee[ // Parting Required (Min) 1S9 Spaces (Osp/1000A d Parting Provided (Min) 1S9 Spaces (Osp/1000G) p _ Residential '\\ / TTOnl[5: 108 Onl[5 O / IDwn Homes: 36Units 19 Us Dark Homes: 33 6Units D �/ eros: Density vcAcre I Open Spa® \ yO / Open Space Required T31 369 0Acres(SIpV open sparoodProPark 31 DO 50 v) meignmmoodrses 11 ares 4r"�1� Fual Open Sparses (2680 Aces / �"rte 4nr j �� � — — = ost v. CD As l= jx _ I couFr „ 7 ul•I I �, See PARK HOMES i32)r TOWN HOMES a3LO�47� eTS 60LOTS END UNITS TOMOaT3d DOPEN SP,O3�ERwa o�OOO 0SeLOTS F6] 55 INTERCO GETS iIHhwoR0S' so Lon . FE 1 0 UAKPARK, DUBLIN, OHIO •Preparedfor Ananuc aeauy r semme Solo- oeveioPmem EDGEcRl o.. DEVELOPMENT DATA GrossArea Commercial FloorNea —' Parking Required (Min) / Parking Provided ter). y Residential �I Total Onl[s: Lawn Homes Mtge Homes: Ink Homes: Gmss Density /F Open Spa Or Open Space Pe Open Space Provided IVelgldlSI4a/ks : Fucal Ope,pm $ales: ,61.39 Acres 39,700 Square Fee[ 1S9 Spaces ce, S000st) 1S9 Spaces Op SOOOSC I(C Units 36 Units 39 Units 33 Units 1 76 D Acre UPuswu pu weuamn O Sowu xousmw Omniuc .mow ® vuuas xousmn o ,... nu rmx oassan.1"In enaaana—„nwrmnuc— �. .. ..r. m"Meant rnn"Ir .5 OAR PA.. ,mr .EDGEcRcua a T � �` ,% �.�--rte �- *� .:. �. c,�, . _ ^�' +`.� ,; '6R � _ _ ' b '�- . .✓ _ w a� s � .a ..� � _- _ � �' Y- �� jX;y, � .. �& t -�' , e�+ 'i .� YOM, �tFA 1� w Ri A ]VI D8INN 0J - i8 H1J31I H D8V i goo ALL �.goPo CL O z W! LU: I Aft At&"- UffI%X-' the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkwayo Dublin, OH 43017-1090 ityof Dublin Phone: 614-410-4400,e Fax: 614-410-4490 Cit Too, Members of Dublin City Council From: Dana L. McDaniel, City Manager Initiated By.* Vincent A. Papsidero, FAICP, Planning Director Logan Stang, Planner I This is a request for review and approval of a rezoning to amend the approved development text of a Planned District to permit 20 single-family lots and establish development standards where 36 townhome units in six building was permitted within an existing resiciential development. The proposal includes a preliminary and final plat that will create 20 single-family residential lots and two private open space reserves. Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, Subarea D — Rezoning August 10,, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Permitted Uses The development text provides standards, requirements and restrictions for the development. Permitted uses are limited to single-family detached homes and two reserves for open space. The maximum number of lots permitted is 20 in addition to the two open space reserves. Access & Utilities The proposal uses the existing public and private infrastructure to provide access to the single- family lots and public utilities. No changes are proposed to any public rights-of-way and no infrastructure improvements are required to the roadway network. Architecture and Building Materials The proposed development text contains architectural standards and permitted building materials. Four-sided architecture is required along with architectural diversity to create a diverse architectural theme. The text also outlines that architectural facades be approved by thd Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, Subarea D — Rezoning August 10, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Planning and Zoning Commission with the final development plan and that staff may permit additional models using the requirements outlined in the text. Permitted exterior building materials are brick, wood or stone, manufactured stone, stucco, cementitious fiberboard (Hardi products) and other comparable materials. Permitted trim includes wood, aluminum (for gutters and downspouts only), EIFS, copper and fiber-cemen products. Roofing materials permitted include dimensional asphalt shingles,, wood, slate,. copper, standing seam metal and/or tile. I Memo re. Ord. 52-17 Oak Park, area D — Rezoning August 10, 2017 Page 4 of 4 —the Planning and Zoning Commission simultaneously approved a final development plan at their July 13, 2017 meeting, which the applicant will be able to implement if Council passes this Ordinance. Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 52-17 at the second reading/public hearing on August 28, 2017. Planning also recommends City Council approval of the Preliminary ,,?,nd Final Plats at the hearing on August 28, 2017. Dayton Legal Blank, Inc. Ordinance No. RECORD OF ORDINANCES 52-17 Passed Form No. 30043 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 2.9 ACRES FROM PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (OAK PARK, SUBAREA D) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (OAK PARK, SUBAREA D) FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT TO PERMIT THE CONVERSION OF 36 TOWNHOME UNITS IN SIX BUILDINGS TO 20 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS WITHIN AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (CASE 17-0282/PDP/PP/FDP/FP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description, Exhibit A), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance there within. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of , 2017. Mayor - Presiding Officer ATTEST: Clerk of Council 071 7L7 Dublin Jerome Hiah School '. rcyF L� �Fw�r r. to � - � ►~ � all -GREENLAND�PL { o Bishop's -c Run TULLY�M_OREe�DR�. D]■ 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/ 0 150 300 Preliminary Plat/Final Development Plan/Final Plat City of Dublin Oak Park Subarea D F2EY Oak Meadow Drive Land Use and long Range Manning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin. Ohio 43016-1736 -honei TDO; 614-4154600 Fax: 614-4154747 Weis Sitr": woo AVblin,oh.us February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONIING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PL.EASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: [] Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning [] Corridor Development: District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) [] Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.115) ❑ Minor Subdivision El Right -of -Way Encroachment [] Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Suplflc?rnerttEil Applirafiori Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form, II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): SNOWDROP CRT (S. SIDE) OAKMEADOW DR (1=. SIDE) PRIMROSE CRT (N. SIDE) Tax IDIParcel Number(s): Parcel Size(s) (Acres): SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR PARCELS & ADDRESSES +/- 2.9 ACRES Existing Land Use/Development: UNDEVELOPED PARCELS / LOTS IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE CONK Proposed Land Use/Developrnent: SINGLE FAMILY Total acres affected by application: +/- 4 ACRES III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Please attach additional .sheets if needed. Name (Individual or Organization): OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC� 90 WOODBRIDGE CENTER Mailing Address: WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (732) 750-1111 Email or Alternate Contact Information: BILLH@ATLANTIC Page '1 013 IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part Ill. Please complete if applicable. Name: CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE Applicant is also property owner: Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): BLAUGRUND, KESSLER, MYERS & POSTALAKIS Mailing Address: 300 WEST WILSON BRIDGE ROAD ;100, WORTHINGTON, OHIO 43085 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) yes ❑ no ❑ ! Daytime Telephone: (614) 764-0681 I Fau: (614) 764-0774 l Email or Alternate Contact Information: CTC@BHMLAW COM V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT I PROPERTY OW MER: This is the person(s) who Is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in park III. Ploase complete if applicable. Name: CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): BLAUGRUND, KESSLER, MYERS & POSTALAKIS Mailing Address- 300 WEST WILSON BRIDGE: [ROAD fk100, WORTHINGTON, OHIO 43085 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (614) 764-0681 I Fair: (614) 764-0774 Email or Alternate Contact Information: CTC@BHMLAW.COM VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT o,ir RE PRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owruor, this section must be completed and notarized. I WILLIAM K. HAYES II the owner, hereby authorii:o to act as my applicant or representatives) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modifying the project. I agrae to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property O Date: ❑ Check this box if the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representatives) is attached as a separate document Subscribed and sworn before me this , l day of , � t � •� ..--,20 DEBORAH A LACO State of A Notary publie of Now Jersey ('t4a-todt'-� County of my Commission Expires 09/2512 Vpublic VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by City representatives are essential to process this application. The Owner/Applicant, as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. I WILLIAM K. HAYES II _ _ M, the owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post it notice on the property described in this application. Signature of applicant or authorized representat Page 2 of 3 IDate: IZ•I-%•tb VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The OwnerlApplicant acknowledgmi tho approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when noeded by said Owner/Applicant. I WILLIAM K. HAYES II , the owner or authorized representative. acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guaranteeor binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential servicR�ffnd sew �r facilities when neaded by said OwnerlApplicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized. Date: 1219.1 I WILLIAM K. HAYES II _ - ___ _ , the owner or authorized representative, have! read and understand the contents of this application. The informalion contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized repress Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,__%� , 20 State of DEBORAH A LACQVARA County o A NotaryPUMNotary Public ew Jersey A— �_1 jlll- � M� �atry _ Date: IZ • lar- ( rrrr�rwu w � FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: Application No: P&Z Date(s): P&Z Action: Receipt No: Map Zone: Date Received: Received By: city Council (Second Reading): City Council (First Reading): City Council Action: Ordlnanae Number: Type of Request: N, S, E, W (Circle) Side of: N, S, E, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: Distance from Nearest Intersection: Existing Zoning District: Requost:ed Zoning District: nnn�Nwi�ww� Page :3 t 3 Oak Park Dublin SW Corner Hyland Croy and Mitchell DeWitt Roads Rezoning Statement and Development Explanation for APDP of Subarea D Oak Park March 23, 2017 RezoninLy Statement Amended Preliminary Development Plan for Subarea D Summary: This application is an Amended Preliminary Development Plan (APDP) for Oak Park Subarea D which converts 36 attached three story townhome units to 20 detached single family homes. The new lots are similar in width to existing Oak Park Village homes at 55' but have slightly less depth at 104' versus 125' for the Village lots. There is no driveway access to the front of the new lots with all access being to garages at the rear or side onto private streets currently named as "lanes". The new homes will be similar in size, architecture, quality of materials and cost to already developed Oak Park single family homes. 4(A) Relationship to Existing and Future Land Uses in the Surrounding Area, the Street System, Community Facilities 0 -pen Space S stem Services and Other Public Improvements: The dominant point in this response is that this APDP is for an interior portion of an existing developed residential subdivision and as a result its primary relationship is to that immediately surrounding development. Nevertheless, the proposal continues to address current land use planningguidance for the general area. The Future Land Use Plan designates the west side of Hyland Croy Road in this location as Mixed Residential -Rural Transition at a typical density of 1.5 units du/ac with a mix of housing types on smaller lots with significant provision for open . s aceDevelopment goals p p include the preservation of natural features and the creation of comprehensive greenway systems and open vistas. Because Oak Park was initially conceived under Conservation Design principles the development has 31 acres of open space on a 61.3 5 acre site; over one-half of the total area is open space. The developed portion is surrounded by open space on all sides, providing open vistas. Oak Park's bikeway system ties into that of the Metro Parks, both helping to create and integrating into a comprehensive greenway system. In terms of density, the reduction in units under this application results in a total of 92 units (down from 108 units) or about 1.5 du/ac for the entire site. As a result, Oak Park today, with this APDP, is true to current planning guidance. Outside of the Oak Park boundaries, nearby land uses are Dublin Jerome High School, the Glacier Ridge Metro Park and nearby single family residential subdivisions. Oak Park as a residential community relates positively to each of these uses on a land use basis. Oak Park APDP Rezoning and Development Statement March 23, 2017 Page 1 Oak Park was required to contribute to the improvement of adjoining street systems on Mitchell Dewitt and Hyland Croy Roads, including to the roundabout to the northeast. These contributions were to both the City of Dublin and Union County. 4(B) State How The Proposed Rezoning and Development Relate to Existing Land Use Character in the Vicinity: As described in 4(A), Oak Park, as modified in this proposed APDP, continues to be a naturally compatible residential land use to the high school, nearby residential developments and especially the Glacier Ridge Metro Park. 4(C) State How the Proposed Rezoning and Development Relates to the Dublin Community Plan. If the Proposal is Inconsistent with the Community Plan, Then Justify the Proposed Deviation From the Community,Plan : As discussed in 4(A), this APDP continues to be fully compliant with the current Future Land Use Plan. The APDP is also naturally compliant with the Northwest Glacier Ridge Area Plan of the Community Plan, in that the open vistas preserve rural character and the generous setbacks provide safe and efficient transportation options, while providing the desired primary land use of residential development at the appropriate density. Bikeway access is among the best available in Dublin, considering the developed Oak Park system as well as nearby neighborhood bikeway systems and the adjoining metro park system. Adjoining roadway and roundabout improvements envisioned in this area plan have been supported by Oak Park. 4(D) Explain How the Proposed Rezoning Meets the Criteria for Planned Districts (Code Section 153.052(B)_ This APDP modifies the approved Oak Park PUD with a design that is fully sensitive to the standards and intent of the original zoning and seamlessly blends into the existing residential development with similar in fact the same --architecture and materials. The proposed detached single family homes are in fact more consistent with the existing 72 single family homes than the townhome uses being replaced. The applicant has carefully modified existing Oak Park designs to preserve the existing "look" of English and Irish Garden Villages while transitioning to a single family layout without garages on the front elevation facing the public street. Six building designs are proposed in the tandem Final Development Plan (FDP) with site layout on the slightly shorter lots emphasizing both a "patio" layout in some designs and traditional rear yards in others. This approach provides designs appealing to both families and empty nesters, encouraging neighborhood diversity. The consistent element of the existing subdivision that remains unchanged is the large amount of integral open space and interrelationship to the adjacent Glacier Ridge Metro Park system, including a significant bikeway system. The existing street design encourages the "Village" feel of the development and discourages high speeds in the compact residential area. If a previous application has been denied by City Council within the last twelve months...: There have been no denials at any time. Oak Park APDP Rezoning and Development Statement March 23, 2017 Page 2 Development Explanation for Subarea D Amended Preliminary Development Plan History: Oak Park was planned in 2005, prior to much of the development in the northwest quadrant of Dublin and the adjoining township. The owner of the 61 acre parcel, a partnership named HC Associates, sold the land to Oak Park on the condition that the partnership would retain a portion of the land for commercial development. Oak Park planned its residential development around this 3.4 are retained commercial portion which became Subarea E of the Oak Park PUD. Subarea E consists of two 1.7 acre reserves to the north and south of the entrance road, Oak Park Boulevard, at the eastern edge of the development, but set back significantly from Hyland Croy Road. To transition between the Oak Park detached single family homes and the commercial Subarea E, Oak Park created Subarea D. now the subject of this APDP. Subarea D consisted of 36 three story townhomes in six clusters surrounding the commercial subarea on three sides, leaving the fourth side facing Avery Road open for visibility. Notably, the rezoning application for the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) included impressive architectural and materials requirements and actual drawings for the single family, townhome and the commercial portions. These requirements proved to be economically impactful for all three areas, but especially for the townhomes and commercial area. Subarea E, the commercial portion, allowed 39,700 feet of development with a broad swath of most uses in both the Neighborhood Commercial and the Community Commercial categories, to also include convenience stores and miscellaneous food stores. Drive through uses, outdoor service facilities and Auto Oriented Commercial Uses were also allowed as Conditional Uses. The largest single use was limited to 20,000 square feet. The Oak Park PDP was approved by City Council on November 20, 2006. Although the residential portion of the PUD was well received, Planning Commission and City Council expressed skepticism regarding the commercial portion unless construction took place concurrently with the residential. At the Final Development Plan (FDP) hearing for the residential portion of the PUD on March 15, 2007, a condition of approval was that the commercial portion be promptly filed, which was done in August of 2007. However, the owner of the commercial portion never took the FDP forward as required by DC 153.053(D)(4) and DC 153.053(E)(2)(a) and (b), which provide, respectively, for review by Planning Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. In the ten intervening years, development of the single family residential portion of the PUD has continued steadily with commendable attention by Oak Park to quality architecture and materials. As of this time, build -out of the 72 available single family lots is approaching. g Although two building permits were issued, no townhome units have been constructed and there has been no activity of any sort regarding the commercial. Oak Park APDP Rezoning and Development Statement March 23, 2017 Page 3 The Planninp, Dilemma: As development direction in Dublin's northwest along the quintessentially suburban Hyland Croy corridor firmed up, it became apparent that residential development was either in the single family or gray scale, ie empty nester, market sectors. The narrow three story Oak Park townhomes in Subarea D obviously did not appeal to either families or older buyers and no construction was commenced. Early on Oak Park understood that a change needed to take place, but discussions with planning staff deadlocked on the perceived need of the Sub Area D townhomes to serve as a transition/buffer to the commercial Reserve E. However, the Reserve E commercial had not moved forward. Possible reasons are the debt burden for its $1.8M portion of the Oak Park infrastructure (which impacts ability to compete with other commercial sites), the advent of more visible (the commercial portion is set back over 200' from Hyland Croy Road) and functional nearby commercial areas along Hyland Croy Road, Post Road and Jerome Village, the limitations on commercial signage visible from Hyland Croy Road at the subdivision entrance, and the significant expense of the Oak Park architecture and materials --requirements not shared by competing commercial sites. Although these considerations are speculative, the bottom line is that market forces have not favored commercial development of Subarea E and the trend line appears to move farther away as time passes. The impact on Subarea D was not speculative however, and the townhome portion of Oak Park was held hostage to serve a need that appeared to no longer be present. Further, Subarea D was approved for a land use market, that if ever present, certainly no longer existed and thus could never fulfill the original transitioning/buffering mission. The world had moved on, and the uses envisioned in the PUD for Subarea D no longer made sense in the marketplace. But, from a planning standpoint, the artificial purposes and requirements of the PUD remained. Reaching the Break Point: The impending exhaustion of available Oak Park single family lots forced a decision point: Either the Subarea D townhomes would need to be converted to a marketable single family or empty nester product or the subdivision would "go dark"; residential development would cease and the Oak Park construction and marketing staff would no longer be needed. The Oak Park residents would be left with a gaping undeveloped vacant area in the subdivision center along with a restricted census of residents available to contribute homeowners dues for maintenance of the clubhouse, landscaping and private roadways. With this backdrop, Planning Staff suggested an informal hearing before the Planning Commission to ask for direction on converting the townhomes in Subarea D to other residential uses. This hearing before the Planning Commission took place on November 10, 2016 with positive comments and this APDP amending Subarea D was then prepared and filed. Description of the Subarea D APDP Application: The 36 townhome lots, generally about 22' wide, are converted to 20 single family lots about 55' wide with garage access from the rear or side on the existing private lanes/alleys. 55' is the minimum width and many are wider. 55' is also the standard for the existing Oak Park "Village" home lots. The depth of the lots is 104'±, shorter than the standard of 125' for "Village" home lots. These new lots are captioned as Oak Park APDP Rezoning and Development Statement March 23, 2017 Page 4 "Villa" lots, generally favoring patios between the garage and the house rather than garages in the front and traditional back yards. However, some models do have a smaller more traditional rear yard which may appeal to families. The architecture and materials standards are identical to the existing Oak Park residential sections and the structure size and price points will also be similar. In fact, the proposed "Villa" homes are directly modified from existing Oak Park models. The Final Development Plan (FDP) is presented concurrently with the APDP so that the Planning Commission can see the proposed architecture models before approving the APDP. Six architectural facades are presented for approval; all are duplicates or adaptations of existing approved Oak Park models and all have rear loaded garages for alley access. The APDP Development Text provides for the possibility that the Subarea E commercial parcels and the existing private streets/alleys might be incorporated into traditional single family lots, should that option become available; these areas would simply need to be rezoned and added to the new Subarea D in that case. Should Subarea E develop residentially at some point after Subarea D is developed with "Villa" homes, it would be possible to simply convert to this new Subarea D and also develop more "Villa" lots, probably twelve in number, fronting on Oak Park Boulevard and Oak Meadow Drive. Conclusion: Planned Unit Developments allow a "custom" rezoning tailored to specific conditions present at a point in time and proposing a combination of specific and detailed uses not otherwise available in a standard zoning category. The risk is that such detailed requirements of the PUD may miss the mark, for whatever reason, and not be developable. This APDP addresses that risk in the case of Oak Park by presenting a workable and high quality solution at least for Subarea D. Oak Park cannot solve the issue of Subarea E at this juncture. However, the new Subarea D homes with rear garages can successfully border Subarea E if it does in fact develop commercially, and if not, the Subarea D standards can be applied to Subarea E for future development of additional similar homes. n4 Date: joC 0 topher . Cline Attorney at Law Blaugrund, Haynes, Kessler Myers & Postalakis 300 W. Wilson Bridge Road Worthington, Ohio 43085 614-764-0681 Oak Park APDP Rezoning and Development Statement March 23, 2017 Page 5 0.907 ACRE Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, being all of Lots 73 to 84, both inclusive, of the subdivision entitled Oak Park, of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260 (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio), and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a northwesterly terminus of the right of way of Primrose Court; Thence South 84° 41' 01 "West, with said northerly right of way line, a distance of 345.25 feet to a point; Thence North 50° 18' 59" West, with said northerly right of way line, a distance of 21.21 feet to a point in the easterly right of way line of Oak Meadow Drive; Thence North 05° 18' 59" West, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 89.67 feet to a point; Thence with the boundary of Reserve "I" of said subdivision the following courses and distances: North 84° 41' 01" East, a distance of 377.95 feet to a point; South 05° 18' 59" East, a distance of 91.90 feet to a point; With the arc of a curve to the left, having a central angle of 09°22'58", a radius of 60.00 feet, an arc length of 9.83 feet and a chord that bears South 36049'40" West, a chord distance of 9.81 feet to a point of reverse curvature; With the arc of said curve, having a central angle of 52°32'50", a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 14.00 feet and a chord that bears South 58°24'36" West, a chord distance of 12.39 feet to a point; and South 84° 41' 01" West, a distance of 4.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.907 acre of land, more or less. 0.555 ACRE Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, being all of Lots 85 to 90, both inclusive, and Reserve "C" of the subdivision entitled Oak Park, of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260 (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio), and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a northwesterly corner of Reserve "I" of said subdivision, in the southerly right of way line of Oak Park Boulevard; Thence with the boundary of said Reserve "I" the following courses and distances: South 05° 18' 59"East, a distance of 222.83 feet to a point; South 39° 41' 01" West, a distance of 19.80 feet to a point; and South 84° 41' 01" West, a distance of 90.10 feet to a point in the easterly right of way line of Oak Meadow Drive; Thence North 05° 18' 59" West, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 211.83 feet to a point; Thence North 39° 41' 01" East, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point in the southerly right of way line of said Oak Park Boulevard; Thence North 84° 41' 01" East, with said southerly right of way line, a distance of 79.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.555 acre of land, more or less. 0.555 ACRE Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, being all of Lots 91 to 96, both inclusive, and Reserve "B" of the subdivision entitled Oak Park, of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260 (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio), and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a southwesterly corner of Reserve "J" of said subdivision, in the northerly right of way line of Oak Park Boulevard; Thence South 84° 41' 01 "West, with said northerly right of way line, a distance of 79.10 feet to a point; Thence North 50° 18' 59" West, with said northerly right of way line, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point in the easterly right of way line of Oak Meadow Drive; Thence North 05° 18' 59" West, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 211.83 feet to a point; Thence with the boundary of said Reserve "J" the following courses and distances: North 84° 41' 01" East, a distance of 90.10 feet to a point; South 50° 18' 59" East, a distance of 19.80 feet to a point; and South 05° 18' 59" East, a distance of 222.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.555 acre of land, more or less. With the arc of said curve, having a central angle of 86°01'36", a radius of 20.00 feet, an arc length of 30.03 feet and a chord that bears South 34°05'04" West, a chord distance of 27.29 feet to a point in the easterly right of way line of said Spring River Avenue; (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Fairfield County, Ohio), 0.907 ACRE Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, being all of Lots 97 to 108, both inclusive, of the subdivision entitled Oak Park, of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260 (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio), and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly terminus of the right of way of Snowdrop Court, in the boundary of Reserve "J" of said subdivision; Thence with the boundary of said Reserve "J" the following courses and distances: North 840 41' 01 "East, a distance of 4.14 feet to a point of curvature to the right; With the arc of said curve, having a central angle of 52°32'50", a radius of 14.00 feet, an arc length of 12.84 feet and a chord that bears South 69°02'34" East, a chord distance of 12.39 feet to a point of reverse curvature; With the arc of said curve, having a central angle of 09°22'58", a radius of 60.00 feet, an arc length of 9.83 feet and a chord that bears South 47°27'38" East, a chord distance of 9.81 feet to a point; South 05° 18' 59" East, a distance of 91.90 feet to a point; and South 84° 41' 01" West, a distance of 377.95 feet to a point in the easterly right of way line of Oak Meadow Drive; Thence North 05° 18' 59" West, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 89.67 feet to a point; Thence North 39° 41' 01" East, with said easterly right of way line, a distance of 21.21 feet to a point in the southerly right of way line of said Snowdrop Court; Thence North 84° 41' 01" East, with said southerly right of way line, a distance of 341.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 0.907 acre of land, more or less. 17-028Z/PDP/FDP: PUD - OAK *OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC PARK SUBAREA D - 90 WOODBRIDGE CENTER DR. TOWNHOMES WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 STEPHEN G & AMY LYNN LUCAS 7142 SNOWDROP COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 SONTI SATYAKARTHIK & JHANSI DAYALA 7126 SNOWDROP COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 PENDRUSUGUNAKAR & RACHANAJINNA REDDY 8043 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 PRATHIBHA & SRINIVAS AKULA 7995 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 KENNY & SUSIE YOUN 7967 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 BHAVANI CHADARAM & PRAKASH RAU SUBRAMANIAM 7015 GREENLAND PLACE DUBLIN, OH 43016 ANAND PADMANABHAN 7951 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 MEI HONG & CHENG ZHAO 7110 SNOWDROP COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 AROUBSHANAAH 7118 SNOWDROP COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 KATHLEEN BARTUNEK 8027 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 NATHAN & MELANIE HAWKEY 7983 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 SRINVASULU CHAPPIDI & NEERAJAKSHI NADENDLA 6999 PRIMROSE COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 THOMAS & ROSEMARIE DESCHLER 7023 GREENLAND PLACE DUBLIN, OH 43016 YI SUNG HO & SUN BEE LEE 7039 GREENLAND PLACE DUBLIN, OH 43016 *CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE 300 W. WILSON BRIDGE RD. #100 WORTHINGTON, OH 43085 MELVIS & CHRISTOPHER HOUSEMAN 7134 SNOWDROP COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 JSDI OAK PARK LTD 470 OLDE WORTHINGTON ROAD WESTERVILLE, OH 43082 KARE RAJESH KIRAN & KEERTHI ARADHYULA 8007 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 SREENIVASAPULI & SWATHY KAMPATI 7975 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 TEJAS WINI YARMAKALA & SREEKANTH BASIREDDY 7007 PRIMROSE COURT DUBLIN, OH 43016 PRASAD VEMPATI 7031 GREENLAND PLACE DUBLIN, OH 43016 BRAD BECKMAN & EMILY WARRENBURG 7047 GREENLAND PLACE DUBLIN, OH 43016 MOHAMMAD & SHIRIN ASADI GONG, RONGSHENG & TIMOTHY LINN & 7055 GREENLAND PLACE HUIYING HAN SAGE STILLMUNKES DUBLIN, OH 43016 7157 OAK VIEW AVENUE SOUTH 8048 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 DUBLIN, OH 43016 RAYAPATI, VENKATA & DAVID & LORI THRONDSEN SUNITA CHAUDHARY SOUJANYA TIPIRNENI 7895 HYLAND-CROY ROAD 8040 OAK MEADOW DRIVE 8051 OAK MEADOW DRIVE PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 DUBLIN, OH 43016 DUBLIN, OH 43016 ANIL KUMAR & SUSHMITHA BURRA 8059 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 SHERMAN & VANIDA SERNA 7959 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 DANIEL FETSKO & LAURA KIRK-FETSKO 8035 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 STEVEN & ROBERTA JENNINGS 7991 OAK MEADOW DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43016 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBAREA D: "Villa" Homes I. Description: Subarea D. here proposed for revision/rezoning, currently exists in the Oak Park subdivision and is situated in the east -central portion of the site. This proposal will amend the development standards for Subarea D to provide for the development of detached single family homes in place of the currently allowed six unit townhome buildings. These single family homes will be "Villa" homes on lots with approximately ±104' depth with rear or side access garages with private street access. This revised subarea will consist of approximately 2.9 acres. II. Permitted Uses and Development Standards: Permitted uses in- this subarea shall include detached single family homes and two landscape reserves. Unless otherwise specified in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply to this subarea. Basic development standards are compiled regarding proposed density, site issues, traffic, circulation, landscaping, and architectural standards. These component standards ensure consistency and quality throughout the development. III. Density, Height, Lot and Setback Commitments: A. Lots will have a depth of approximately ± 104' and will not have driveway access at the front of the lot, but will only have vehicular access to garages, which are required, from the side or rear on the Private Streets B. The maximum number of lots in Subarea D for the existing f2.9 acre subarea bordered internally at the rear by the existing Private Streets will be twenty (20) lots with the development standards required by this text. C. Setbacks and Building Lines: (i) Each lot in Subarea D shall have a minimum width at the front building line of fifty-five (55) feet, or, in the case of a lot with a chamfered corner at the front of the lot, fifty-five (55) feet between the side lot lines immediately to the rear of the chamfer intersection with the side lot line. (ii) Building Setbacks: The minimum front yard setback shall be nine (9) feet from a public right-of-way. In the case of a chamfered corner at the front of a lot, no setback from the chamfer line is required. Corner lots with facades facing two public streets (not private streets) may also have nine (9) foot front yard setbacks required on both rights of way if so reflected on the Final Plat. There shall be a minimum rear yard setback of ten (10) feet from the rear property line. No driveway or garage access from the Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS front of the lot is permitted if the lot is bordered at the rear or side by a public or private street. The minimum side yard setback shall be six (6) feet, except where a side yard borders a private street or reserve in which case no setback is required. Where lots border or include an easement, the side of buildings or other permissible elements may be constructed to the boundary of the adjoining easement. No service structures may be located in front setback. D. Window wells may encroach into side yards a maximum of three and one half feet, provided that the side yard is at least six (6) feet and provided that there is a minimum of eight (8) feet of separation between these permitted encroachments on adjoining lots, as measured from the nearest corners of the window wells. Where practicable window wells visible from the public right-of-way shall be constructed of materials that complement the architecture of each unit and shall be screened using an evergreen plant material or an alternative decorative screening mechanism. Air conditioners, compressors or other HVAC or service structure units may encroach into side yards a maximum of two and one-half (2 i/z) feet, provided the side yard is at least five (5) feet and must be screened as required by code. All other encroachments into side yards shall be permitted in accordance with the City of Dublin Code unless otherwise set forth in this text. E. Maximum building heights: Thirty-five (35) feet as measured per the City of Dublin Code. F. Permitted Lot Coverage: (i) The maximum lot coverage for the structure(s) and impervious hardscape of each home and garage in this subarea shall not exceed seventy percent (70%) of the total lot area. IV. Access, Parking and other Traffic -Related Commitments: A. Garages must adhere to the minimum side yard and rear yard setbacks, as included in the development standards of this subarea, along all public and private roads. B. All units shall be required to have a minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces in the required garage. Three car garages are permitted. C. All dwelling units in this subarea shall front on a public roadway. Except as waived by the Planning Commission in the Final Development Plan, roadway standards shall be as prescribed in the Oak Park Preliminary Development Plan text. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS D. Sidewalks; walking trails, bike paths: A final system of sidewalks, walking trails and bike paths will be provided as approved in the Final Development Plan for Oak Park. These may include current facilities. Public sidewalks shall be constructed of concrete and shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, and will be constructed at the time each lot is developed. Handicap ramps are already constructed but will be modified if required to current engineering standards. Walking trails may be constructed of an impervious or pervious pavement type and shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in width. Bike paths shall be constructed of asphalt and shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in width. E. Access: Access to Subarea D shall be from a public street network connecting to Hyland -Croy Road on the east and to Mitchell -Dewitt Road on the north. Access also shall be provided from private streets in Subarea E. V. Architectural Standards: A. All structures shall meet the City of Dublin Zoning Code Residential Appearance Standards unless otherwise set forth herein. Specific architectural facades will be approved either as part of the Final Development Plan for this revised Subarea D, or at a later date by Planning Staff utilizing the guidelines set forth both in this section and the approved Final Development Plan. Existing approved designs from Oak Park are approved for this revised Subarea D also. This Section V and the existing developed homes in the Oak Park residential subareas, approved as part of the standards for Oak Park, shall serve as a guide for architectural approvals under both the Final Development Plan and any approvals by Planning Staff. (i) This section acknowledges that changing market conditions or other unanticipated factors may make it desirable to create new home models or facades subsequent to approval of the Final Development Plan. Planning Staff has the authority to approve these new models or facades when in keeping with the spirit and theme described in this section V. (ii) This section further acknowledges that modifications to approved facades may be necessary or desirable, such as might be required because of the need to adapt approved facades of existing models to function on a Villa lot, to modify an existing approved fagade to create a new fagade to allow compliance with diversity requirements, or because of internal changes made to the footprint, floorplan or interior layout that require revised exterior fagade changes. Planning Staff has the authority to approve those changes when in keeping with the spirit and theme described in this Section V. Changes to side or rear facades with a low degree of visibility from public streets require a less demanding review prior to staff approval. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS B. Architectural Theme: Building designs will be inspired by English and Irish garden cities distinguished by a park -like ambience, rich architectural detail, and a sense of quality and permanence. C. Exterior materials: (i) Cladding materials: The exterior of all structures in this subarea shall be constructed of all natural materials such as brick, wood or stone, or, manufactured stone, stucco, cementitious fiberboard (eg Hardi products), and other comparable materials, or any combination thereof. Trim materials: Permitted exterior trim materials shall include wood, aluminum (for gutters and downspouts only), EIFS, copper, or fiber - cement products. (111) Roofing materials: All homes shall use dimensional asphalt shingles, wood, slate, copper, standing seam metal, and/or tile. D. Four-sided architecture shall be required so that similar architectural design elements and details will be consistent throughout all elevations of the structure. Rear and side elevations of dwellings, except garage facades facing private streets at the rear of the structure, shall include quantities of brick and/or stone that are comparable to the quantity of brick and stone found on the front elevation of the same structure, unless approved otherwise by the Planning Commission as part of the Final Development Plan or by Planning Staff; provided however that reductions of brick and/or stone on other than the front elevation shall not exceed 30% and shall be in locations with reduced visibility from public or private streets. E. Chimneys: All exterior portions of chimneys shall be finished masonry consisting of brick, stone, or manufactured stone. F. Garages: Decorative garage doors with a "Carriage look" shall be provided on all units. G. Lighting: Each unit shall have a minimum of one (1) approved yard post light near the sidewalk at the front entry and one (1) wall -mounted porch light at the front door. Lamp locations shall be consistent from unit to unit. H. Architectural Diversity Within Subarea D: (i) No home two lots to the left or right of the subject lot shall have the same front facade as the subject lot. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS No home directly across the street and one lot to the left or right of that lot shall have the same front facade as the subject lot. However, this requirement may be adjusted depending on specific site conditions. An example would be a home across the street facing on a different street. a. The above requirements do not apply between homes in Subarea D and Subareas A and B where the home concerned is an approved model unique to Subarea D. Corner lots 118 and 119, with a chamfered corner line located at the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Oak Meadow Drive, are required to be developed with mirror image versions of the same model, an exception to the diversity requirements above. Additionally, the homes on these two corner lots will front on Oak Meadow Drive. VI. Buffering, Landscaping, Open Space and Screening Commitments: A. All residential landscaping shall meet the requirements of Sections 153.130 through 153.148 of the City of Dublin Zoning Code. B. Any proposed service structures must be located behind the front setback and shall be screened on all sides visible from the public right of way. C. Open Space: The existing Reserves titled "B" and "C" are deleted and are replaced by two new landscape reserves labeled "N" and "O" totaling approximately .06 acres and located along both sides of Oak Park Boulevard at the intersection with Oak Meadow Drive along Lots 118 and 119. The visual impact of these landscape reserves will be enhanced by the removal of on street parking spaces previously planned along Oak Park Boulevard and they shall be landscaped with a design to be provided at the time of the Final Development Plan. i. Reserves "N" and "O" will be owned by the homeowner's association (Oak Park Community Association, Inc.) upon turnover by the Developer. The landscaping on these Reserves, including hedges and other plantings, as well as any columns and benches, together with similar landscaping on the adj oining Lots 118 and 119 and in the adjoining tree lawn in the Right - of -Way will be maintained by the master homeowners association to the extent landscaping details are depicted in the Final Development Plan. Landscaping in Reserves "I" and " P adjacent to Lots 128 and 109 which is intended to screen or enhance the view of the homes built on these lots from Hyland Croy Road will be maintained by the homeowners association. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS D. Tree Preservation: There are no existing trees to be preserved in Subarea D. E. Street Trees: Street trees shall be required along all public streets. If feasible these trees shall be located in the tree lawn and shall be generally spaced a minimum of twenty (20) feet and a maximum of forty (40) feet on center. Spacing shall be determined at the time of Final Development Plan in order to ensure the proper streetscape for each portion of this subarea. If a tree lawn is not available due to development configuration, grated tree wells or other acceptable solutions may be substituted in the Final Development Plan. All trees shall be a minimum of two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in caliper at installation and approved through the Final Development Plan review. Trees may be grouped as indicated on the Final Development Plan, provided that the quality is in accordance with applicable City of Dublin landscaping standards. Trees shall not obstruct sight distance or signage, subject to staff approval. Street trees and sidewalks will be installed on lots with the construction of each structure F. Private Streetscape: Within the private streets running behind the proposed buildings, street trees shall be provided as approved in the Final Development Plan for this subarea at the rate of a minimum of one per lot in a consistent streetscape design that incorporates permitted fencing and shrubs as follows: Landscaping is required along all fences constructed next to a private street. At a minimum, landscaping shall contain at least one shrub per each five linear feet of fence, or fraction thereof, within a landscape bed a minimum of 36 inches beyond the fence. Shrub spacing shall be at the industry minimum standard by species. Landscaping shall be continuous and is intended to help conceal the view to the fence. Plantings should be designed and creatively clustered by species, and respond to the character of the adjacent architecture and surrounding area. Most plants need to be selected to reach a minimum height and width of 4'x3'. In all areas where landscaping is required, the surface area of any landscape bed shall be covered by living materials or bark mulch. Gravel or other non -living materials shall not be permitted as a cover for a landscape bed . Landscape plans shall be submitted with the building permit. The location of the street trees will take into account actual development of each lot and will be indicated on the approved building plan for each home. G. Temporary Fences: Fences used as temporary barriers during construction around vegetation must be sturdy and at least four (4) feet tall and shall be an orange or opaque snow -type fencing. All temporary fences must be removed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS H. Permanent Fences: i. A landscape hedge as a part of a consistent streetscape design shall be permitted to encroach into the minimum front yard or side yard setbacks and to run parallel to the property line on the front and side lot line of each lot where adjacent to public streets. Permanent fences along -a side yard setback abutting a public right of way, private street or Reserve are limited to 4' in height. 11. A six (6) foot high privacy fence on the property line, including within easement areas, between lots shall be permitted to separate rear yards or hardscaped decks or patios, or to screen a side yard along a private street or reserve, provided that materials for such fences or walls are in accordance with standards approved in the Final Development Plan. However, a fence along a private street or reserve may only be 4' in height. 111.Privacy/security fences of uniform design at the rear and side of any lot adjoining a private street shall be six feet in height at the rear and connect to a four foot in height fence at the side of an adjoining private street. Fences may span any open space or side yard setback between adjoining buildings, including within easement areas. The purpose of these fences is to provide a continuous security treatment between the rear of the residential lots and the commercial areas. The Final Development Plan may require installation of these fences and further may specify the particular fence designs, the colors, and the heights if there is a variation in different locations. a. If these fences are required by the Final Development Plan, to ensure a consistent desirable visual appearance, maintenance of the fences and any required landscaping associated with the fences will be by the homeowners association (Oak Park Community Association, Inc), with the expense allocated as determined by the Association. iv. If garages are located behind "Villa" homes in Subarea D, these are intended to serve as a screening mechanism between the indoor and outdoor living spaces of the "Villa" homes and the commercial uses in Subarea E. No additional screening shall be required within Subarea D between these subareas. V. Additional permanent fencing standards and details may be approved as a part of the Final Development Plan for this subarea. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 7 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VII. Graphics and Signage Commitments: At the time of the submission of a Final Development Plan for any portion of Subarea D to the Planning Commission, the developer shall present the Planning Commission with a graphics and signage plan for review if any signage is proposed for the areas to be developed. This plan shall be consistent with the uniform graphics and signage plan for all residential development within the Oak Park PUD. This Subarea D graphics and signage plan shall be consistent with the approved Final Development Plan for Oak Park, and its terms shall apply to all residential graphics and signage within this subarea. In the event that the graphics and signage plan is silent on any matter addressed by the City of Dublin Sign Code, Sections 153.150 through 153.164, then the terms of those Code sections shall apply. VIII. Universal Maintenance: All new lots developed within Subarea D shall be included in the existing homeowners association (Oak Park Community Association, Inc) created for the Oak Park development. A. Owners of lots within Subarea D may be provided maintenance of landscaped areas of their homes if so elected by the homeowners association, but if so, shall pay a fee for this service that may be in addition to the homeowners' association dues that will apply uniformly throughout the development. VIV. Model Homes: Homes may be used as model homes for the purpose of marketing and sales. A manufactured modular building or model home may be used as a sales office during the development of this Subarea and the construction of homes therein, subject to City of Dublin Zoning Code 153.098. X. Phasing: Subarea D will be developed in a single phase. XI. Homeowners Association: All lots in Subarea D will continue to be included in the Oak Park Declarations and Covenants and the existing homeowners association, the Oak Park Community Association, Inc. Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 8 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Submitted this 1St day of August, 2017 l Christopher T. Clin Attorney at Law Blaugrund, Haynes, Kessler, Myers & Postalakis 300 W. Wilson Bridge Road Worthington, Ohio 43085 614-764-0681 ctcgbhmlaw.com Oak Park Subarea D July 27, 2017 Page 9 Vicinity Map Scale: V= 2000' OAK PARK SUBAREA "D" SINGLE FAMILY HOMES DUBLIN, OHIO PRELIMINARY /FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR: OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC 90 Woodbridge Center Drive Woodbridge, NJ 07095 P: 732.750.1111 F: 732.596.8461 CIVIL ENGINEER & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emhuom INDEX OF DRAWINGS 1. VICINITY MAP 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN 5. CONCEPTUAL STREETSCAPE EXHIBIT 6. ILLUSTRATIVE RESERVE N AND O ENLARGEMENT 6A. RESERVE N AND O LANDSCAPE PLAN 7. TYPICAL FENCE LOCATION PLAN 8. LANDSCAPE DETAILS 9. PRELIMINARY PLAT 10. ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 11. ILLUSTRATIVE ENLARGEMENT PLAN A/ • I ��,, I � r ' I , Dublin Jerome High School " �, - • 40 ev •S'>. { YAni ` t`r y +a,'� ♦ I 1- *i� - q� �, `,, r �:+.� It a ` -• : '.. _...: ' _�'-�- � - .. _. —�- ter•--�.._-:. '�� a Hyland -Croy Road ---------------------- _j -..--.-.-•-, ^ : 0 Olktree Drive North I� vr r t r Oak Meadow Drive Cv t z U i r. a v; 0 •� L PC ' \ l ice•. /, ` ,," l: U11 V' Pleasant Drive __..��- ---- _ ,_.-• . � 1...... ,: -- / san Wop J �`„ 1r'., \ J ~. •�'!�j •� _ �� 1't'^j' t� • f ►4L-4w�.lF r G• 1• i 'S w - u 'y ►�4 tel^ i` i fz - . '•.'- -v ' 3Fr I 1 - S r �4e 44 1K '` ♦ f S 1 �jj`� _ _ 7�y t_ F =� 4 Glacier Ridge Metro Park Z O Un F+I a Aw z � o w0 �x� z a U c ='oma Cf7 M C N � a�aa= aha 0 0 O a > > v L N 4 UQ� c, 010 z mO O > C Lt) t LU w LO a DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 1/11 E of u L E DUBLIN JEROME HIGH SCHOOL BISHOP'S RUN SECTION 2 BISHOP'S RUN SECTION 2 yar / g SUZANNE B. FEASEL, TRUSTE P. B. 5, P. 122 & 123 P. B. 5, PP. 122 & 123 95, P. 821 RESERVE D RESERVE D ivy SUZANNE B. FEASELTRUSTEE SUZANNE B. FEASEL �� O �Op — a P. 821, — D. B. 269, O.R. 23 SUZANNE B. FEASEL, TRUSTEE 280 O.R.0. R. 595O.R. 595, P. 821 a IX f HYLAND—CROY ROAD Mir" offneff MIX HYLAND—CROY ROAD '6 H.C. ASSOCIATES 61.390 Ac. D.B. 307, P. 713 !� HYLAND—CROP ROAD HYLAND—CROY ROAD 1, ♦ ms �m'r'3f•'• gra• I ®_,.,c��• i '� Op0 / \ � 4�F �°% r w '�i � _ r r x r •� r / err \ \ rw r vs Mir Oy\/ °�yb nerr.Y ��'T � Ia�e •r I i •� Site for Rezoning Q �O It rea. C �•� �' )o O rear ^� >r >• ,tae I! ® W I s � R I Q, 40 AV t .air I I I zoAa� �I !�r •N w yl ua•.r I � O•Al.•[ IRI r wolrYr Wal rar _ rear _ r ear I s�r srrl_— 5 e�r R ...l.[.ar ,a,R 4 j rwsrs. •� cc I g1.... [1r8�1r 1 .� Ilir wsrs . o e.slr[ 6 y YONIYI•• a41 I !W I lOA1•c��•//0��r �� w — — r Ia�l1E tar I�YMOJrlr U� a43r M EE .V I 91 y I !enls•ci>Pr I �rw sYnrr F� I mr I ! A arnr 1 ` 1 3 I \Zeq alar ► II I •� R S. 45 _� lir HYLAND—CROY ROAD ."- T DAVID H. THRONDSEN AND LORI M. THRONDSEN O.R. 749, P. 108 py =� !/.1•[ I j Fp[ 1 MOJ.!• RI e�r ' w� —1 `I m ■ 0 r77�� ae�e r — �+r.l �J• �i 00 YONIYI•• R K •sYrs• I ! a.'ev rr Q aY lastr[ arr R d�irwuvr a 1 S + • `'`\ f / 91 e�r y le,sntleer r � Y � errr.r s.y=r � wows•• �� \ �13 �✓' I ...,,•[�° I � — — — — � � — — — — — �, I eliirw.iss•. i " .� �� a 1 . I � / � w••••• I ...s•. M I M as a� a� a! al e � a0 N N of N a6 �rw.�,.s•. � "' `ter �I � I( .ari)hIii I'll i9 gi:4:8 fir :•-rt �rw.ss. ! -�-` ! 1 ..... _ ! a r r� r I r� r r ��• rr r, ! � [ l y �✓ �I 4;4 A R eQPeK,x MEADOW DRIVE R * OAI(OAK MEAWM( DRI Ill Z '•'!' ! a i + �•- �1[ ear IV Clef °Q ' • A OA\ C 4j/ Opp I � \ I I `\ I , y,� ens r46 ea err e Y \ •i= 4� \ _ ear 1 � n� �I \ \ s�r \ ete r � a rvr BLYTH FAMILY LLC 46.508 AC. (ORIGINAL) O.R. 288, P. 411 ins• ■ nm1m n� err. A. sera. Yr 4 I 4 PLEASANT DRIVE 4 r rc 4 4 •. ewe t+r !I I er -- BLYTH FAMILY LLC O.R. 288, P. 411 Q W ACE s O �I Q, 40 r AV .� Ji I I I zoAa� eater !�r •N w yl ua•.r � IRI r Wal rar _ rear _ r ear I s�r srrl_— 4 j ry=r rB�•f j Z 6 w — — r U a43r MBS! ` 3 \Zeq alar ► II I •� R S. 45 y,� ens r46 ea err e Y \ •i= 4� \ _ ear 1 � n� �I \ \ s�r \ ete r � a rvr BLYTH FAMILY LLC 46.508 AC. (ORIGINAL) O.R. 288, P. 411 ins• ■ nm1m n� err. A. sera. Yr 4 I 4 PLEASANT DRIVE 4 r rc 4 4 •. ewe t+r !I I er -- BLYTH FAMILY LLC O.R. 288, P. 411 GLACIER RIDGE z ° z Ga. Q W ACE s O �I Q, W I I 0 O I I zoAa� � ih, I w yl ua•.r � IRI U Wal ear I Z w — — r U 6•_� MBS! GLACIER RIDGE z ° z Ga. Q W O COO Q, W 0 O A zoAa� � C w a � COO Wal U f n j =Q •6 c C m Q • h � mo o m 2 c � o o = E EdU� o O,n O L = E td,a� U . Q © 0020 0 Z o c O c w w2 a DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. GRAPHIC SCALE 20160307 0 50 loo 200 SHEET 1 inch = 100 feet 2/11 Y U 0 ED ♦♦ ♦ 1 / 1 \ / / \ 1 I / f \ 1 / / II___ \ \ 11____________________________-_ i ---------------- ________ __�__ ___ ____________________________________ I _ _ / �� ____� - ----------------- ' ____ I I I I �, 00 - 1 4 - RESER ✓ N S05' 18'59 "E - - - I �a e� e� I N Oaktree Drive North (Private Street) 3 iii I {�u 430.50' 2 N- 1 - - -t _ 0 m -lick �_ d I 4 3 c.I m� S05' 1 '59 "E 2 I 430.50' -! Oaktree Drive North (Private Street) N RESERVE 7' 1 '- - - 0 / \ _ cN z1�\ \ 43.76' 1 50' R W / I\ . 43.76'/ alk \\ 91.90' O I FI i I Ii M I 505'18'59"Etl.:. \/;1141 91.90' / �rN. RVFB B 1 25 25 B Bi -R o En 128 6930.01 SF oo9 10 4 I 1 o 0 12' 12' I 00 I 6930��SF 1 d �I a IZ II Z a1 I I 1 1 i 10� 1 1 104.67' io is 104. sT --�--I I I I h I ! I'* $-- to 1 I I ILo 1 9' Building Line (Typ) In 2 - g 127 1 aoo S I I 1 �� .. I M o 110 1 23' a a Z L 56 0 I 6279.98 SF oo W Z I "� s� a0 Z o 6279.98 SF °I I�00 l56 *l Rl y 1 y. o' I 1 FUTURE COII/ME7PLYAL AREA 1 I (BY 07HER$j "� o O :r FU7URE 0113 A/ERCIAL AREA I (BY 07HERS) '� I 9 1 -L n� A x I� 104.67• io I I RESERVE 'A' 1 > RESERVE I is 104.67' 0 09 a to 1 10' Building In W = I� I 1 10' Building Line (Typ) 1 .. I L I I a P• LII o I d Line (Typ) 1 9' in �I W126 x d �O 10 6803.31 SF oL0 LO d I O of I } o0 6803.311 SF Z 9. 10' a I I } I a 1 yN -- ---I 1 13' -4- 1 10' Building Line & Easement Line _ _ 505' 18'59"E � ee L F I 12 12 I 0 ?a I 10' Building Line & _ _ _ Easement_I 505' 18'59"E - - - J 13' 14' I Q W H 104.67'z 28' 0 25' 25' -0 28' _ a N I B -B - - $ - - - i - - - - - - - - - - 10' Buildin Line do Easement Line I N} I I I N} 0' - - - - - - - 10' Building Line do Easement Line i = B -B - - - - - �* - - W a r.T.l Z �I a Fc., 1° ±0.91 Ac. 0 LO I 0 I a 112 6803.31 SF v 1 M W IC O Oa O I 127 10' � Ac. 1 -� FSI 6803.31 SF f7 I 01 r / I � � ±0.91 9' Buil ding Line (TY P)e lrl! 1rn `� m REM?W '✓' I d m S05'18'S J S07'26 1 tI T 2 �T 0 - - 05'18'59"E a °p 2503'11' "ERESE)4VF 7' `� - T q t Z -- 1o4.sT �o �0 104.67' io io = e = _ = Tj I 1 __ m 76.5 w e m 505' 18 59 E 50.CLinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street) / T�4, S05'18'S9"E T16.'�3��� 76.52 m 54.04 Shumard Oak Lane nvate Street SO 8'59"E 150.81 m (Private ) T �0`T8'5 9 1 a' w A ^✓' 1 1 41.00' p 5.00' 55.000' 55.00' h 6183' 55.00' 5.00' p 55.00' 41.00' r 124 6279.98 SF 0,�0� 0 0 0 \ o 0 9 O , y 113 -1 ISI ISI Z oo '� 10' Building 50' 10' Building �' 00C�P 1� 9' U Z Line (Typ) _ RESERVE 0' RIW lope RESERVE 'N' Line (Typ) s' ° O. 6279.98 SF 1 23' FN Z .a w Z --T"- -- ----- - I 1 B �' B w 122 0 121 w 0 120 0 6 119 v> 12'^t 12'I a i vl w 00 m z cn 6' 118 5692.30 SF 0 = 6� 117 w 0 6---104I---=--�Z-- 0 = 116 0115 = g B 0' B ---- a a a 104.67 m m .67' `° 1 5627.64 SF 5725.64 SF v 5725.64 SF 5692.30 SF rn rn 5725.64 SF v 5725.64 SF 5627.64 SF 1 o 0 o o o o o o o o 1 a co rn 12J o ro m 6' z ±0.56 Ac. 8.8 ' 13' 13 83' ±0.56 Ac. Z a a o 0 i„ n j 0 1� 9' 1 6270.18 SF 9' Building Line (from edge of ro m coo 0' z ' B' 6' 9' Building 125' 25'I �� 1�9 6' 6' 9' Building 6' N M m 0 0' 114 6269.75 SF 9' Building Line ' I 1 1 - c chi -6 ° „ o N - 1 Si a alk Line (Typ) 8�, 1 Sidewalk _ (from edge of c j - - - - - -f.- , 9sr sidewalk) 1 ' Sidewalk tib' d 1 �, sm . E t Line (Typ) h alk 1 Sidewalk walk) 1 - L - - - - -QE n d° ti o' -d o O• �� s --X6'$3--- --- 5.4 OIL x.44---- -U'�--- ti L---'� ----� - O�� .. V �'S'44 ---�5�`0� --� --- a --�G.$-- 1� �- =0.0 m .us E Y n Ramp I I� Ex Ramp 10 to h 3 N \ Ix i� 1•�1 m m I 00 I m N m 9 i� --'� N05"18 59 "W 8I m x I (Typ) 00 m 281.33 1 1 71 cy m I m 6 5 r7 m I �_ m 4 (Typ) io 3 In N \ o: i� r� m I co m w m I m 2 o 02 `0 u> w £ p_ V p { Meado hive (Public Str t) o + - } 246.50' 281.33 - I- - �� I- - i� - o - - - i - 0 - - - DATE N C� r � 1 � � I I ��_ T � I I 1 � � �� C� N August 1, 2017 T-�--T -,- -- - - --�,, �,- T --T T ---T------ T+�--"�---c_-- SCALE r�� SITE DATA: As Noted Site Area: ±2.9 Acre JOB NO. Lots 20 DU 20160307 VILLA LOT STANDARDS: GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET Minimum Lot Width- 55 0 15 30 60 Minimum Lot Depth- 104' 3/11 1 inch = 30 feet 000000000000' ;; .+ • • �U w , • • 00000000000,; O -------- , ' " ----------- - 1 �\ — � ---r- --T � —1— -r-- T__ r1-- r r__T 1-- --r-- --T— --T T --r —T-- —T— --r- T__T_... � \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • �. I� I � —r-- —T— • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Ex. Landscape Ex. Curb�T Oaktree Drive North (Private Street) - Oaktree Drive (Private Ex. Curb' ) I Ex. Landscape 1 \ / I I I Typical Landscape Typical - - - I (1 )AP I (5)MS 128 I - all - -1 - - - - b \ II I Ir - - �ILandscaping Landscaping in Reserves adjoining the east line L I I of Lots 128 & 109 (Reserves "I" & "J") intended I I to screen or enhance the view of the homes built on these lots from Hyland Croy Road will I I I be maintained by the Homeowners Association. I I I See Development Text for Suabrea D. I I I I I I I - _� t----------- I I + - �_ - - - - - - - - - - F--- \I -------------- - in Reserves adjoining the east line of Lots 128 & 109 (Reserves '1" & "J" intended I I + r to screen or enhance the view of the homes I I I built on these lots from Hyland Croy Road will be maintained b the Homeowners Association. I I I See Development Text for Suabrea D. I I I I I I I I I I I III I i i _----___--- ----------- - - - - Y77) �N AP(1) 109 J I I I I � I l \ \ - \�\ !— I I I z O w w a � F. Hedge: Snow Drop Court shall be Winter Gem Boxwood. Hedge variety to be consistent on each street. To be planted a t 3 6" o. c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. -- ---- I I 127 I I -i- I I // I [� Ex. Landscape I I I o L �j t �/� t I I C7. ld C}I tF7.�UG C7` I L I I I I I I I Zoned Commercial I I �l K�l---------------� I ----------- -------y I I. I I - J Zoned Commercial I I I I I o I I I I Typical Landscape Hedge: Primrose Court shall be Winter Gem Boxwood. Hedge variety to be consistent on each street . T o b e planted at 36 o.c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. a a „ 00 a CQ A 110 I I I- I ---- _ + I �- +ri -- ° U e M -- ---- --1--- - ------ _ 126 Prop. 4' Walk I i Ex. Curb I (2)AP 125 124 I PO 6 () I 5 I )MS 123 I (1)AP ALM vLi AF AF(1) (1) Street Tree Per Lot: I Located at the rear of the lot along the private streets. Final location will be I indicated on each approved -- --- I building plan. -- ---- ---- I (trees shown are conceptual) i �I ----- ---- -------�---- I { ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- I -t---- ----- --- ----1 --- I ___ I I ----- ---- — I _ . Private Street Landsca In %, ,^� Reserve Landscape, P g ., , See Sheet 6 „ See Note (Sheet 5) �� Chinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street) - - - - - - - - - - + LT(4) Ex. Ramp /—�`II.—\� 7J Brick Column, ell TYP d / Prop. 4' Walk o (1)PO 22 121 120 119 Ex. Curb Typical Landscape Hedge: Oak Park Boulevard shall be Hick's Yew. Hedge variety to be consistent on each street. To be planted at 36" o.c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. f QR(4) AL 5 Brick Column\ O Prop. 4 Walk / �\ TYP• F Ex. Curb / _ _ _ d t o e' III '� O I - - I T 1116 1 (2)AFAF(2) _ _ I I _ _ I I -+ ---- T---- ----- _(1) Street Tree Per Lot: Located at the rear of the __lot along the private streets. ____ I g. I Final location will be I -- -1--indicated on each approved PP I building plan. I (trees shown are conceptual) ---- . ----1 ., .. Private Street .._'— See Note - - - Shumard Oak Lane (Private Street) - - - - Ex. Ramp (4)LT Brick Column, Typ. Prop. 4' Walk Ex. Curb 118 I I 117 Typical Landscape Hedge: Oak Park Boulevard shall be Hick's 115 Yew. Hedge variety to be consistent on each street. To be planted at 36" o.c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. PO(1) �(4)QR Brick Column Prop. 4 Walk TYP• AF 1 \ Ex. Curb _ _ I I •ti: �% I a + ,. >'~ I Landscaping „ (Sheet 5) % L\ 1K_ \ \� I /� \ F \ F -� a ° a ---L--- Xl I - -t - - _ - . I \� ,_ � / x O 111 Pro 4' Walk P' i Ex. Curb I ----- Z W G. A W Z W � O O W x� V FQiI W dl ISI a p p - - - - - - - - - - - - - AP 2 ( ) 112 F-1 ----- I I I - (6)PID 11¢ CV(5) I AP(1) I MAF AL(1) AF(1) _ ffhc�acS, �a ._ � m� � m E � � � eo-'og Edu! g _ o oy�� f m C 02t E o E _ _ _ _ _ _ - V O Typical Landscape Hedge: Oak Meadow Drive AF 1 shall be Dense Yew; Hed e varlet to be 9 Y _ _ _ - _ _ _ consistent on each street. To be planted at _ _ _ 36" o.c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. 1M \ Oak Meadow Drive ubticStreet) \� _ _ Ji ALM / L Typical Landscape Hedge: Oak Meadow Drive Ex. Tree, Typ. _ _ _ shall be Dense Yew; Hedge variety to be _ _ consistent on each street. To be planted at b - 36" o.c. and maintained at 36"-42" height. DATE August 1, 2017 n\ n 1171=3_ J=a wa Be Edg I 77 n Canopy Height 8' Min in + 35' Sight Triangle --- I i PLANT SCHEDULE TREES M BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SZE CONDITION i n SCALE As Noted Sidewalk Lawn Ex. Curb Parallel Parking Spaces La n ulch / N Tree o o _ S uare 0 0 L6 o o o �/ o o -I -/ o o \\ 1 \� 20.00' 20.00' 35.00' 35.00' in 20' Zone AF 14 Acer freemanii 'Sienna Glen' Freeman Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B AP 8 Acer platanoides 'Columnar Broad' Parkway Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B AL 12 Amelanchier laevis 'Lustre' Lustre Allegheny Serviceberry 2.5" Cal. B&B CV 10 Crataegus viridis 'Winter King' Winter King Hawthorn 2.5" Cal. B&B LT 8 Uriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree 2.5" Cal. B&B *SM 14 Magnolia stellata Star Magnolia 2.5" Cal. B&B MS 10 Malus x 'Spring Snow' Spring Snow Crab Apple 2.5" Cal. B&B PO 14 Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore 2.5" Cal. B&B QR 8 Quercus robur 'Regal Prince' Regal Prince English Oak 2.5" Cal. B&B *Note: Trees are shown on Sheet 6A - RESERVE N AND 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN *Notes: Street trees and sidewalks shall be installed with the construction of each structure on the lot. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 is 30 60 JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 411 Typical Tree Lawn Enlargement Typical Intersection Sight Triangle Enlargement 1 inch = 30 feet Scale= 1" = 10' Scale= 1" = 20' -------------+------ I I i I I I I I � - - - - - - - ------ ------ r— �I I I------- ------------ ------+------ I I I I I I I I I I C— �� I ------- ------T------ ------ ------ I I I I ���------ II Private Street Landscaping: I I ------- ------+------ ------1------ P I Q�' L------ Landscaping is required along all fences constructed next to a private I I I I I street. At a minimum, landscaping shall contain at least one shrub per I +QI+ I ____________ ______ each five linear feet of fence, or fraction thereof, within a landscape IT bed a minimum of 36 inches beyond the fence. Shrub spacing shall be at the industry minimum standard by species. Landscaping shall be ��------- I------- ______1______ ______rt______ continuous and is intended to help conceal the view to the fence. I I L I I I I Plantings should be designed and creatively clustered by species, and -----_ ------ I respond to the character of the adjacent architecture and surrounding - - - - - - - ------+------ I ------+------ I I area. Most plants need to be selected to reach a minimum height and I I I width of 4'x3'. In all areas where landscaping is required, the surface T______ _ _ L area of any landscape bed shall be covered by living materials or bark I I I I( / mulch. Gravel or other non -living materials shall not be permitted as a I I cover for a landscape bed. Landscaping is shown as conceptual. —(1) Street Tree Per Lot: Located at the rear of r the lot along the private streets. Final location Shumard Oak Lane (Private Street) Chinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street) J_ — ■ will be indicated on each approved building �t " - - - - - plan. (trees shown are conceptual) Fence, Typ. (Optional) - -I- I I s: Property Line Property Property See Detail (This Sheet) — — — — — — — — — — Line — _ Ex. Ramp Ex. Ramp — — Linel — — — — YI I I / Driveway wn riveway Driveway Lawn —Driveway — — riveway Lawn Drrvewa Dri' Lawn 9.50 i 10' Building Line I I I +I I 10' Building Line I I J1jLot Garage Ii II Ii Garage II II aII Ii Garage lIil I Garage IIII I III Garage I I Garage La n Fence, Typ. (Optional) I + I III Pat io See Detail (This Sheet) Prop. 4' Walk Setback 4awnl Setback ■ p. 4' Walk ILawP I Icc 121 1201 32.00 32.00 1 PV97 Patio Line I I I I + I I + I I Ardmoor Ashbourne I ------+------ --- I I I ------L------ --- GRAPHIC SCALE I 0 5 10 20 1 inch = 10 feet I � Z -------------------I -------I ,e O I a II I W I I I I H ------+------ ------ (1 ) -----(1) Street Tree Per Lot: Located at the rear of the lot along the private streets. Final location will be indicated on each U approved building plan. (trees shown are conceptual) I a = I a L IIII n II I Driveway 0 Garage Patio Line 11551,� ' Cn IIII I III Carowe N ' I J S 4-k k reacI IIII AAaax I� 3 Q Y U M IJ J e ac Castletroy I I Augusta 1 I I 1 I Typical Yard Tree, Prop. I By Owner Building Line I I Prop. 4' Walk I D Lawn m O 0 0 o.- /ri 00� Prop. Tree Lawn 0 0 0 0- - 00 Oak Meadow Drive (Public Street) N g + + + x N O 00 0 }6 F— 1` I I I I I I I I I + T + if • ' • ' ice. V -Pr .. BuildingVr4 Line ..__ tel® • • ®`ate lv � = L i R 1 00 "'p11 • • aLww80aFilvi EE` :�0000a H A r�iiil' •• i N N / N I N + T + if • ' • ' ice. V -Pr .. BuildingVr4 Line ..__ tel® • • ®`ate lv � = L i R 1 00 "'p11 • • aLww80aFilvi EE` :�0000a H A r�iiil' •• Prop. 4' Walk I Ashleigh I I Castletroy •, I I �• P W �" -� w 116 I Typical Yard Tree, I I w By Owner I 1 d Prop. 4' Walk I I I l O I 1 O W -- — —L — w� g toF- Lawn Ir LAw� IFggggggggg x o Prop. Tree Lawn'o q w Ij-I O 1� N a Q W d o - O �I .a �V ISI U 0 Oak Meadow Drive (Public Street) 0 w Z 0 0- O DATE AUGUST 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 5111 �IIIIIII►JII��1�;;���-°.a Prop. 4' Walk I Ashleigh I I Castletroy •, I I �• P W �" -� w 116 I Typical Yard Tree, I I w By Owner I 1 d Prop. 4' Walk I I I l O I 1 O W -- — —L — w� g toF- Lawn Ir LAw� IFggggggggg x o Prop. Tree Lawn'o q w Ij-I O 1� N a Q W d o - O �I .a �V ISI U 0 Oak Meadow Drive (Public Street) 0 w Z 0 0- O DATE AUGUST 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 5111 Chinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street) Shumard Oak Lane (Private Street) Oak Meadow Drive (Public Street) Reserve Enlargement Plan Scale: 1"=10' l� w z w H a w ��z a WOw 0 ° � A z � Aw Www a �Ww z a'"Ww a V � N Ooo - q) o E c D u goo—E v a t 00 E 0 v u Q � N v �z 4i C �O O 1C 1) L W W L,)cL DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 5 to 20 SHEET 6/11 1 inch =10 feet — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— —------------------ - � J— Chinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street)Shumard Oak Lane (Private Street) — — — — — — — ---------------- Bed— — — — — — — Lot 119 Bed Edge, Typ. Lawn Brick Column, See Detail HB(7) Black Ornamental Bench, See Detail 5 HH(40) Lawn Black Ornamental Bench, See Detail HB(7) SM(7) Bed Edge, Typ.---i \ Lawn —�'_ Sight Triangle N if I/ T \(?f -- ---� 6 Street Trees (QR) Y�------ % t_ Lawn Lawn // +}+*\ + \\ \ \ t U / / O� \ }QO U 0C - I (33)HH Bed Edge, i C. 0 c� r Lawn Typ' Bed Edge, C. �\ . O� , Il T C. oo °e 0�. _� Oo V : 01 C�� 10 v �o o f o 0.0C. +�t lT A U +,t. + 1 .3V0 (13)HB (t� }(t) HB(13) DOC. O iJt } O L. U }� 0C NF(34) O 3 ct3 }+V A J t �' }� �A (14)HH HH 14) 1 * ( o0 �i. U Bed Edge, oo U Typ- Lawn +}� �Ct,)t+—(19)NF vv Lawn Edge, \)O/ Lawn TYP. A > Lawn \ LawnO � Lawn — � O aBrick Column, See Detail Brick Column, / See Detail Street Tree, Typ. Street Tree, T YP Oak Meadow Drive (Public Street) Reserve Enlargement Plan Scale: 1"=10' Brick Column, See Detail Bed Edge, Typ. Lawn — (29)TH (23)NF (7)HB Black Ornamental Bench, See Detail Lawn IBlack Ornamental (Bench, See Detail Lot 118 (19)NF (7)SM F Bed Edge, Typ. \\ Lawn \ ,I_1►1111.Y6l:lgbill 101 1:1q a.Iaq041I_I i01 A 101.11 TREES Q'f]' BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME 52E CONDITION SM 14 Magnolia stellate Star Magnolia 2.5" Cal. B&B *QR 8 Quercus robur 'Regal Prince' Regal Prince English Oak 2.5" Cal. B&B SHRUBS QU BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SITE CONDITION NF 119 Nepeta x foassenn 'Junior Walker Junior Walker Catmint #1 Cont. TH 58 Taxus x media 'Hicksii' Hicks Yew 24" HL B&B GRASSES 2U BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SP"E CONDITION HH 169 Hemerocallis x 'Happy Retums' Happy Returns Daylily #2 Cont. PERENNIALS 9a BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION HIS 54 Hydrangea paniculata 'Bobo' Bobo Hydrangea #3 Cont. *Note: Tree is also included in Street Tree Plant Schedule, Sheet 4 N a 2' 1'-10" :::::....... Brick Column No Scale Manufacturer: Robinson Iron Model: Expo Bench Finish: Black Bench (Match clubhouse bench, this manufacturer or equal) Stone or Precast Conic. Cap Brick to match or complement homes on lots 118 & 119. Note: All landscaping depicted on this drawing in Reserve "N" and "0" and the hedge and columns on Lots 118 and 119 facing Oak Park Boulevard shall be installed by the Developer and will be maintained by the homeowners association, with the exception of existing street trees in the Right—of—Way, which in addition to the new street trees proposed, shall be maintained by the City of Dublin. See Development Text for Subarea D. C^ 0 V 2 o 0�Eg e`o3= E EsuB B o axe 044 ©Ie8 tTg� � O W = � • G P4 F C 2 -- . Aad aw; a C^ 0 V 2 o 0�Eg e`o3= E EsuB B L ©Ie8 tTg� � F C 2 Viz.. e Me DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 5 10 20 SHEET 6A/11 1 inch =10 feet I I I� I I I I I I I I I I I I + I I I I I I I I I I I I+ I I I I I I I I I I I I+ �I �I I I I I �I i I I I � I I � I p a 1 I � I I � I° I � I C I+ o I p I iA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � 128 1 127 126 ' -------------- 125 124 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Oaktree Drive North (Private Street) I I I I I I l i I I I I I — Oaktree Drive North (Private Street) — — — — I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �• I I I I I I I _ 109 I II I I I I I I I I I I I r I— — — — — — — — - Zoned Commercial I 6' Wood Privacy Fence with Lattice No Scale 122 N 120 119 F - F Oak Meadow Drive (Private Street) -- +—----— —— +--- --—w X --, \ I I ��r--- \ Yom.-. 4' Wood Privacy Fence No Scale I I O Zoned Commercial I -t-- U}vm C}oma ONO I 1 I ti 0- E ° FI- AEU I I I t +4, I -__-- ---_I---- i N �Z -__-- j -- t_ ___-1__-- C so U 0)O O > C LO L W W h d II I � 1 I ----T---- I I I Chinkapin Oak Lane (Private Street) I / T II T y II y� ----1---- I ----+---- I I \> � 122 N 120 119 F - F Oak Meadow Drive (Private Street) -- +—----— —— +--- --—w X --, \ I I ��r--- \ Yom.-. 4' Wood Privacy Fence No Scale I I O Zoned Commercial I -t-- I Typical Fence Location Plan Scale: 1" = 30' LEGEND 6' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE WITH LATTICE 4' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE NOTES: 1. ALL FENCES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A SOLID COLOR STAIN, SHERWIN WILLIAMS KILIM BEIGE OR COMPARABLE VENDOR COLOR MATCH. 2. FENCES DEPICTED ON THIS PAGE OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE REQUIRED ELEMENTS TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION OF INDIVIDUAL HOMES ALONG WITH REQUIRED PRIVATE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING. IN ORDER TO ENSURE A CONSISTENT DESIRABLE VISUAL APPEARANCE, MAINTENANCE OF THE FENCES AND ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ASSOCIATED WITH THE FENCES WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. SEE DEVELOPMENT TEXT FOR SUBAREA D. 115 - ---- -- ----------- --- -------- 114 U}vm C}oma ONO ti 0- E ° FI- AEU Taeg E t C � OLO i N �Z C so U 0)O O > C LO L W W h d ----T---- --�---- I I II y II y� ----1---- I ----+---- I I \> � I C 1_ - — — I Shumard Oak Lane (Private Street) 1 I T u n li i ,-- — + 116 0 as 118 117 a 0 IJ I Typical Fence Location Plan Scale: 1" = 30' LEGEND 6' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE WITH LATTICE 4' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE NOTES: 1. ALL FENCES SHALL BE PAINTED WITH A SOLID COLOR STAIN, SHERWIN WILLIAMS KILIM BEIGE OR COMPARABLE VENDOR COLOR MATCH. 2. FENCES DEPICTED ON THIS PAGE OF THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE REQUIRED ELEMENTS TO BE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION OF INDIVIDUAL HOMES ALONG WITH REQUIRED PRIVATE STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPING. IN ORDER TO ENSURE A CONSISTENT DESIRABLE VISUAL APPEARANCE, MAINTENANCE OF THE FENCES AND ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ASSOCIATED WITH THE FENCES WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. SEE DEVELOPMENT TEXT FOR SUBAREA D. 115 - ---- -- ----------- --- -------- 114 DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 SHEET 7/11 1 inch = 30 feet U}vm C}oma ONO ti 0- E ° O AEU Taeg E t C � OLO i N �Z C so U 0)O O > C LO L W W h d DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 SHEET 7/11 1 inch = 30 feet Finished grade 3" depth mulch 24" depth planl Subgrade. Roto -til top 4" of subgrade. Perennial & Groundcover Planting No Scale Adjacent lawn :p Spade -cut Bed Edge Shredded Hardwood Mulch Root flare Pull back burlap and remove excess soil to expose root flare. Remove top 1/3 of wire basket Planting Bed Edge No Scale Do not c 3" depth Create cl well defir 12" min. Remove non-biod be remot Planting - 11W% ..,,.,., ..,, pockets to form when backfilling. Deciduous Tree Planting No Scale 3" depth mulch. Mulch shrubs in beds as continuous hedge. Do not block surface flow of storm water across hedges. Create clean and well defined edge Nanting mix. Do not allow air 0 yama .; ,::::..�w.. ,•::I 1 11*0 t• .:S 9v..i gil•IO� .\�� • • to • • •kfilli • "�!� I�::i• Remove top 1/3 of burlap for B&B root balls. All non -biodegradable material shall be totally removed. Leave mulch 2" away from trunk Rootball Preparation 3" depth mulch No Scale l 1 Seeded lawn Shrub Planting No Scale Rootball Setting No Scale set top of rootball 1" above finished grade. GENERAL NOTES 1. Prior to installation, the landscape contractor shall inspect the general site conditions and verify the subgrade, elevations, utility locations and topsoil provided by general contractor. The landscape contractor shall notify the general contractor of any unsatisfactory conditions and work shall not proceed until such conditions have been corrected and are acceptable to the landscape contractor. 2. All plants shall meet or exceed standards set in the American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI Z60.1, current edition. All plants shall equal or exceed the measurements and sizes specified in the schedule. 3. Substitutions shall only be permitted with notification and written approval from the Owner. Substituted material shall be equivalent or greater in size than the specified plant. Substituted plants shall have the same essential characteristics and growth habit of the specified plant. 4. Confirm location of all utilities and subsurface drain lines prior to plant installation. 5. A pre -installation conference shall be conducted prior to planting operations with Owner and Contractor present. 6. Contractor may slightly field adjust plant locations as necessary to avoid utilities. Finished planting beds shall be graded to provide positive drainage. 7. Irrigation system, if applicable, shall be complete and operational prior to landscape planting. B. Contractor shall repair all lawn areas disturbed during construction with seed and warrant a healthy, weed free lawn prior to project acceptance. 9. Seed all areas within contract limits that are not covered by paving, buildings or planting beds unless otherwise noted. Seeding shall not begin until area has received topsoil and finished grade. 10. Mulch planting beds with shredded hardwood mulch of uniform dark brown color. It shall be free of twigs, leaves, disease, pest or other material unsightly or injurious to plants. Average applied thickness shall be 3" depth. Mulch hedges in a continuous bed. 11. Planting beds shall be covered with pre -emergent herbicide applied at product specified rate unless otherwise noted. 12. Bed edge shall be smooth, consistent, hand trenched 4" deep and "V" shaped unless otherwise noted. All excavated material shall be removed from the bed edge and planting bed. 13. All planting bed edges to be smooth flowing arcs or straight lines as shown on plan. Plant locations and layout of beds shall be located by Contractor and approved by Landscape Architect prior to planting. 14. Install all plants in accordance with planting details and specifications. 15. Parking lot and street trees shall have a clear canopy height of 8' min. 16. Trees shall be placed a minimum of 3' from sidewalks and curbs. 17. Planting Mix shall be blended, manufactured soil consisting of three (3) parts topsoil, one (1) part compost, one (1) part sand. Topsoil shall be per ASTM D5268, ph range of 5.5 to 7, min. 4 percent organic material, free of stones and soil clumps 3/4 inch and larger. Compost shall be yard waste compost from an EPA rated Class IV compost facility or Com -til compost from City of Columbus Department of Public Utilities. Sand shall be per Item ASTM C33. Proprietary manufactured Planting Mix such as Kurtz Bros. Professional Blend or Jones SuperSoil may be used. Submit product data for review by Owner. Place Planting Mix in settled 6 inch lifts. 18. Mix Mycorrhizal Fungi into Planting Mix during placement of Planting Mix. Application rate shall be according to manufacturer's written recommendations. Mycorrhizal Fungi shall be a dry, granular inoculant containing vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi. 19. Excavate planting beds to a depth of 24 inches, unless otherwise indicated. Roto -til subgrade of excavation to a depth of 4 inches, unless otherwise indicated. Incorporate a 6 inch lift of planting mix into subrade. Place remaining Planting Mix in settled 6 inch lifts. 20. Planting beds, including mulch, shall be no higher than 6 inches above adjacent grade and shall not impede surface drainage. 21. Lawn areas shall be backfilled with Planting Mix to a minimum settled thickness of 6 inches. Roto -Til subgrade below lawns to a depth of 4 inches, unless otherwise indicated, prior to placement of Planting Mix. 22. All trees and shrubs shall be fertilized with controlled release tablets of 20-10-5 composition. Size and number of tablets shall be per manufacturers instructions. 23. Composition and application rate of lawn fertilizer shall be sufficient to amend soil according to recommendations of a qualified soil testing agency. Submit soil test results and amendment recommendations to Owner. Lawn fertilizer shall be in a dry granular form. 24. Contractor to determine plant list quantities from the plan. Graphic representation on plan supersedes in case of discrepancy with quantities on schedule. 25. Any item or areas damaged during construction shall be repaired or replaced to its original condition at the contractor expense. 26. Contractor shall thoroughly water all plants at time of installation and as needed until project acceptance by owner. Contractor shall guarantee all plants installed (except annuals) for one full year from date of acceptance by the Owner. All plants shall be alive and at a vigorous rate of growth at the end of the guarantee period. 27. Lawn seed mix shall proportioned by weight as follows: 10 percent NuBlue or Blue Chip Kentucky Bluegrass; 10 percent Caddieshack or GoalKeeper Perennial Ryegrass; 80 percent Quest, Inferno, Arid 3 and/or Pixie Tall Fescue (select 2). Sodded lawns shall match seeded lawns. 28. Lawn seed shall not have less than 95 percent germination, not less than 85 percent pure seed, and not more than 0.5 percent weed seed. z Ga. Q W E� COO 0 M��W °Aad I"I W z � cr z aaa V P,4 Q G. U "v C f o a eh X - o�;2 G p O e EdU� o �a t T.8 m Th a � CV td,a� U Q � m Z m C 0 2 0 Lhc DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 8/11 I \ n Ex 8" San \ A=9' 58" R=�0.00 \ Arc= 1.83 Ch=S4T27'38" \\ 1Ch -9 81 r A=57 2'50" R=1 .00' hBrg 869' '34"E =12 39' REL"J" R/M End -I 2 . i I 1 56' - -I I R W 32 I t / I \FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA / I (BY OTHERS) j\I 126/// x I �9 RESERVE "A" e 6803.31 /SF EXISTING OAK PARK 1 \ PUD -- -�-- 9'' \\ SUBAREA "All E�" St 13' 5" Stm 1,05' a I a (:67i 66i / - - - - '59) w OAK PARK w 8, m /+0.91 Ac. m z DUBLIN LLC B -B a l 125 m = o< / 6803.31 SF W O I / a l- - 105'RESERVE J" sz; r - - o m Ex 15" Stm ' Ex 15" Stm Ex 15" Stm 30 I = J 1 m CHINKAP OAK LANE Pnvate Street) _1 O � ' Y / o ' A S05'1"9�2 - U N 3 N 41' 55' 55 55' -01 U 124 E a 10' B.L. - I " " I .o a_ 6279.98 SF - Existing 10' RESERVE �, v, Easement 0.034 Ac. 3 �j L rn o x w° 10' d P.B. 5 P 26 1 O a #' "I w W g. 1 _929 y ad d 6' A-1`1_01 - w m 105' O Q' I/ / T B e 16 122 121 120 119 29 /I Orf 5827.64 SF 5725.64 SF 3725.84 SF 5682.J0 SF 123 n °0 6.+0.56 Ac. / I 6270.18 SF 6' 6' -930-- / -9301 ___` / Existing 1' Sidewalk w d Existing 1' Sidew Ik / ( / Easement i '� \ Easement --}--V-- P.B. 5 , P 260 / Z \ P.B. 5 P 26 9' B.L. 90 55' 01 55' S5' I 47' Ex 8" San \� 1,� 1 `1 �g29/ jT�E `J j -_-_- ____________________� ______� _ ___ _____ i ____ ___ _ __ _________________ -929 i I wI `2) B i m 71,RESERVE ..I.. Ex 12" Stm N m Ex 12" Stm w w \ 1 ww I OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH Private Street ( ) ce N o =9'22 58 60.00'I I so' Ch=9.8' / I �9�0W I I I S05718 59Walk 91.90'\ A=573 '50" R=1� 92' \ I I ftp1 \ \ E 109 \\ /W Eras \ I N 6930.43 SF Q I 12' 12' X9m a �I I Site Hyland -Croy - I 7 0. ;I �� a v y N \23' w I Vicinity Map \ + 5 $ y n 110 " E - I Scale: 1" = 2000' x w 6279.98 SF 50' I / Q \ / � W ai M o o I > w /W ? FUTURE BYO OTHERS) AREA „\ I Z / I J o QIN 'x m RESERVE "D" \\ I Q Nc 1U5 •L" I . I EXISTING OAK PARK I\ O o ly tO I 2 PUD \\ II Mla I SUBAREA "A" \I I I \\ O I 16803.31 SF \ I \ E \ m Existing 10' _ \\ \ I ai Easement \ o o P.B. 5 P 260 12' 12, \-------- \ \\ I w 1 13' Ex 24" S1m 25' 25' I i , = 73/ / t0' Existing 10' (I OAK PARK E Easement -- I OAK PARK P.B. 5, P. 260 A -D I n P.B. 5 , P 260 B -BI I 112 1 DUBLIN LLC \ I % 6803.31 SF r I \ \ \ J w (11.91 Ac. RESERVE 105' w1 / Ex 12 Stm Ex 12" Stm `BJ Ez 12" Stm o m yea/ is rn O I / m SHUMA OAKTP rlva eS ree m \ tO == - _ r $05! 18 59"EE-22243' 7 1f s N Y / 'Ilfi 55' 55' 55' 41' o y" 113 N a 50' RE RVF Existing 10' \ g30- o c - -� R W In ow 6279.98 SF - E- L-�---- O O �" Easement 10' �xw w i i P.B. 5 P 260 m n I ^ 6' i 0.034 Ac. 6 _j 6' 0111o _ m m - - ______1__________________ w 3 h Q' f0 W _ a ■� tl m 118 117 118 115 e B m 58D2.35 si, o 5725.84 SF 5725.64 SIF o 5627.64 SF � 114 � _ GREENLAND PLACE 95 o O E 6269.75 SF m a (Public Street) 7.83' +0.56 Ac. a 00 6, t v 25' Z 16', O tib J r iatadew 0' Existing dewal 3 Easement P.B. 5 260P.B. 5 P 26s 9' B.L. x 9' B.L. I ---- N I 47' c. 55' 55' 55' 90' m x I I W v- A N39' 1010E - -n y� I� II ��� IIS - 0 X68% - \ / ' /a N n ml m ml N a m ,a N i• m W m 21.21 - I 0 N - 7 m av m - _ - � m ca 5 36. - OAK MEAD W DRIVE - I n m � n o - � m N m - - - 1 W - - - Public Street a9/ n 35.36' ------------ + r---------- ----------- ------------- ------------------ ------------------------- ----------------------------------------- --/ --------------T- � + ----------- - Ex 8" San �� i-, \ 1 - / i \ Ex 8" San Ex 8" San \ Ez 8" Sa Ex 8" San A-_ I i w yam 39 I I I I 38 I 37/ I 36 I 35 I 34� I I i 1 I w I `\ I - o z i >I� 72 \ \ \ 71 70 89 88 87 88 EXISTING O PARK N -- - �_"------- -- -,----------- -- a � XISTING OAK P FETSKO I z 9'a I I I I DANIEL T. I PUD- I OAK PARK I KARE I I-- --------- --' ----- ---- I 3 I I I I I m __ _ w� I ��� PUD SUBAREA B 1 RAJ ES H a F_ _L A L - - - _F > ' a SUBAREA "B- " \ I I I& LAURA A I I I DUBLIN LLC I KIRAN & I w a I PUD i- i AKUI /k I JEN�fIi>1�S I f I I i KIRK-FETSKO / I EXISTING OAK PARK of PRATHIBHA STEVEN M HAWK EY PULI YOUN l I j BARTUNEK, I DUBLINLLCC I // ` I KEERTHI i QIP I SUBAREA "C" I & SRINIVAS I& ROBERTA I MELANIE & ISR€ENIVASA I KENNY K. I I \ I KATHLEEN ARADHYULA O I I M. NATHAN R. & - _& SUSIE S. I I __930 / I I L__\-- AK PAR ---�- I I T 40 i i- I I R. I I' I I I �BLWL�C I I I I I SWATHY I 's3j I I I I KAM PATI ------ 4-4-- J r ���f r -------- ` ` , _-�'------ ----fir - f-----------------------------------�I r ----f--- ------ ---I ----I 1----------------- -- --^/ ----- ----� SITUATE SITE STATISTICS Oak Park is situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Washington Site Area t2.94Ac (Franklin County), City of Dublin, and in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, Lots 109-114 0.91Ac, 39,367 SIF containing 2.922 acres of land, more or less, said 2.922 acres being a resubdivision of Lots Lots 115-118, Reserve "0" 0.56Ac, 24,245 SIF 73 thru 108, both inclusive, and Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of the subdivision entitled Lots 119-122, Reserve "N" 0.56Ac, 24,245 SIF "Oak Park", of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260A - D, said Lots and Reserves being Lots 123-128 0.91Ac, 39,367 SIF conveyed taOAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC by deed of record in Official Record 769, Page Proposed Single Family Dwelling Units: 20 638, Recorders Office, Union County, Ohio. Building Square Footage: Varies (See Architectural Footprints) Number of Parking Spaces: 2 per Unit, min. (In Garage) Impervious Area per Lot: 70% Maximum Open Space Provided: Reserve "N" = 0.03 Ac. GRAPHIC SCALE Reserve "O" = 0.03 Ac. 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 feet z a A W E� C) Ex 8_ San W�/ �I FSI ---------------- �� - - ----- -� -�_ --- �~ ---------------- ----' •------------------------, ------------ ------- ; -------------------- ---- aaa z ESE#VE ;'J"N (5 3? a v m N (?/ O� / L w w Ex 12" S, m N a� Ex 12" St _ e m w W w - OAKTREE DRIVE NORTH JP(vate Street) K % ^ - / 505'18'59"E 91.90' / 92' BrB I \ 128 m 6930.01 SF pO EI I \ I ;SII I N w E I I \ \ I i0 105' II 127 6279.98 SF bj 32 I t / I \FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA / I (BY OTHERS) j\I 126/// x I �9 RESERVE "A" e 6803.31 /SF EXISTING OAK PARK 1 \ PUD -- -�-- 9'' \\ SUBAREA "All E�" St 13' 5" Stm 1,05' a I a (:67i 66i / - - - - '59) w OAK PARK w 8, m /+0.91 Ac. m z DUBLIN LLC B -B a l 125 m = o< / 6803.31 SF W O I / a l- - 105'RESERVE J" sz; r - - o m Ex 15" Stm ' Ex 15" Stm Ex 15" Stm 30 I = J 1 m CHINKAP OAK LANE Pnvate Street) _1 O � ' Y / o ' A S05'1"9�2 - U N 3 N 41' 55' 55 55' -01 U 124 E a 10' B.L. - I " " I .o a_ 6279.98 SF - Existing 10' RESERVE �, v, Easement 0.034 Ac. 3 �j L rn o x w° 10' d P.B. 5 P 26 1 O a #' "I w W g. 1 _929 y ad d 6' A-1`1_01 - w m 105' O Q' I/ / T B e 16 122 121 120 119 29 /I Orf 5827.64 SF 5725.64 SF 3725.84 SF 5682.J0 SF 123 n °0 6.+0.56 Ac. / I 6270.18 SF 6' 6' -930-- / -9301 ___` / Existing 1' Sidewalk w d Existing 1' Sidew Ik / ( / Easement i '� \ Easement --}--V-- P.B. 5 , P 260 / Z \ P.B. 5 P 26 9' B.L. 90 55' 01 55' S5' I 47' Ex 8" San \� 1,� 1 `1 �g29/ jT�E `J j -_-_- ____________________� ______� _ ___ _____ i ____ ___ _ __ _________________ -929 i I wI `2) B i m 71,RESERVE ..I.. Ex 12" Stm N m Ex 12" Stm w w \ 1 ww I OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH Private Street ( ) ce N o =9'22 58 60.00'I I so' Ch=9.8' / I �9�0W I I I S05718 59Walk 91.90'\ A=573 '50" R=1� 92' \ I I ftp1 \ \ E 109 \\ /W Eras \ I N 6930.43 SF Q I 12' 12' X9m a �I I Site Hyland -Croy - I 7 0. ;I �� a v y N \23' w I Vicinity Map \ + 5 $ y n 110 " E - I Scale: 1" = 2000' x w 6279.98 SF 50' I / Q \ / � W ai M o o I > w /W ? FUTURE BYO OTHERS) AREA „\ I Z / I J o QIN 'x m RESERVE "D" \\ I Q Nc 1U5 •L" I . I EXISTING OAK PARK I\ O o ly tO I 2 PUD \\ II Mla I SUBAREA "A" \I I I \\ O I 16803.31 SF \ I \ E \ m Existing 10' _ \\ \ I ai Easement \ o o P.B. 5 P 260 12' 12, \-------- \ \\ I w 1 13' Ex 24" S1m 25' 25' I i , = 73/ / t0' Existing 10' (I OAK PARK E Easement -- I OAK PARK P.B. 5, P. 260 A -D I n P.B. 5 , P 260 B -BI I 112 1 DUBLIN LLC \ I % 6803.31 SF r I \ \ \ J w (11.91 Ac. RESERVE 105' w1 / Ex 12 Stm Ex 12" Stm `BJ Ez 12" Stm o m yea/ is rn O I / m SHUMA OAKTP rlva eS ree m \ tO == - _ r $05! 18 59"EE-22243' 7 1f s N Y / 'Ilfi 55' 55' 55' 41' o y" 113 N a 50' RE RVF Existing 10' \ g30- o c - -� R W In ow 6279.98 SF - E- L-�---- O O �" Easement 10' �xw w i i P.B. 5 P 260 m n I ^ 6' i 0.034 Ac. 6 _j 6' 0111o _ m m - - ______1__________________ w 3 h Q' f0 W _ a ■� tl m 118 117 118 115 e B m 58D2.35 si, o 5725.84 SF 5725.64 SIF o 5627.64 SF � 114 � _ GREENLAND PLACE 95 o O E 6269.75 SF m a (Public Street) 7.83' +0.56 Ac. a 00 6, t v 25' Z 16', O tib J r iatadew 0' Existing dewal 3 Easement P.B. 5 260P.B. 5 P 26s 9' B.L. x 9' B.L. I ---- N I 47' c. 55' 55' 55' 90' m x I I W v- A N39' 1010E - -n y� I� II ��� IIS - 0 X68% - \ / ' /a N n ml m ml N a m ,a N i• m W m 21.21 - I 0 N - 7 m av m - _ - � m ca 5 36. - OAK MEAD W DRIVE - I n m � n o - � m N m - - - 1 W - - - Public Street a9/ n 35.36' ------------ + r---------- ----------- ------------- ------------------ ------------------------- ----------------------------------------- --/ --------------T- � + ----------- - Ex 8" San �� i-, \ 1 - / i \ Ex 8" San Ex 8" San \ Ez 8" Sa Ex 8" San A-_ I i w yam 39 I I I I 38 I 37/ I 36 I 35 I 34� I I i 1 I w I `\ I - o z i >I� 72 \ \ \ 71 70 89 88 87 88 EXISTING O PARK N -- - �_"------- -- -,----------- -- a � XISTING OAK P FETSKO I z 9'a I I I I DANIEL T. I PUD- I OAK PARK I KARE I I-- --------- --' ----- ---- I 3 I I I I I m __ _ w� I ��� PUD SUBAREA B 1 RAJ ES H a F_ _L A L - - - _F > ' a SUBAREA "B- " \ I I I& LAURA A I I I DUBLIN LLC I KIRAN & I w a I PUD i- i AKUI /k I JEN�fIi>1�S I f I I i KIRK-FETSKO / I EXISTING OAK PARK of PRATHIBHA STEVEN M HAWK EY PULI YOUN l I j BARTUNEK, I DUBLINLLCC I // ` I KEERTHI i QIP I SUBAREA "C" I & SRINIVAS I& ROBERTA I MELANIE & ISR€ENIVASA I KENNY K. I I \ I KATHLEEN ARADHYULA O I I M. NATHAN R. & - _& SUSIE S. I I __930 / I I L__\-- AK PAR ---�- I I T 40 i i- I I R. I I' I I I �BLWL�C I I I I I SWATHY I 's3j I I I I KAM PATI ------ 4-4-- J r ���f r -------- ` ` , _-�'------ ----fir - f-----------------------------------�I r ----f--- ------ ---I ----I 1----------------- -- --^/ ----- ----� SITUATE SITE STATISTICS Oak Park is situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Washington Site Area t2.94Ac (Franklin County), City of Dublin, and in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, Lots 109-114 0.91Ac, 39,367 SIF containing 2.922 acres of land, more or less, said 2.922 acres being a resubdivision of Lots Lots 115-118, Reserve "0" 0.56Ac, 24,245 SIF 73 thru 108, both inclusive, and Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of the subdivision entitled Lots 119-122, Reserve "N" 0.56Ac, 24,245 SIF "Oak Park", of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260A - D, said Lots and Reserves being Lots 123-128 0.91Ac, 39,367 SIF conveyed taOAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC by deed of record in Official Record 769, Page Proposed Single Family Dwelling Units: 20 638, Recorders Office, Union County, Ohio. Building Square Footage: Varies (See Architectural Footprints) Number of Parking Spaces: 2 per Unit, min. (In Garage) Impervious Area per Lot: 70% Maximum Open Space Provided: Reserve "N" = 0.03 Ac. GRAPHIC SCALE Reserve "O" = 0.03 Ac. 0 15 30 60 1 inch = 30 feet z a A W E� C) a W�/ �I FSI a aaa z a � � a O� a U f n C f O j X0^ o�;m o = E EED:u° 0 O a L = o E O i C n N 12 U Q � Ze w W5�a DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 9/11 N r - O N r - N IT 2 C Q M 91 a A (0 J 2 d O (Yi O N M r U M T M (1) 1 (0 U) N M J 1) 7 C (1) E N 21 N c W N i Q) Y) > (0 N 7 Q SP IL 0 M IL 0 m (n It O 0 rlO Cl) O O N - _ . _. _ . -:-- _.,.; --. z_ - tom. / 1. ' r _ ( k.. . - JN _ -' ..::L! i .J_:.` 1 -�iE.}. _ �'f V 1. L *., r -: ---7 - / 1, i !�. - - - - - --- - - - - - - -_ i- YK-- S _' __111,111. G!y - - - - - ' - - - - - - --- - .. -of � � - t `e.r = A. - I -1. I r ' .1 - �j `1* � - T - . - -_ _- _ �`�� _ +i _ 10 A � �y�v` fy ��. .P J+' 01 to !� � � y �4� ig � �A fr% � Dib• F � `Ey f f� & • - - - s - I l' w 4A,"� Y - of Ao� y op � ,► a �' i I 1 y, r • -•• � `_. - f . _ +` 1 ,+. t. .. - 4 ��F sC �•• / ✓ ' r�'f ,, FFF % 1 ( 1 i . 'i :1 3.,5: r :� Y . • 0 Vti }, ki h �'� Ak# ,% P" Ai�yl Y + `' `" j %` s"f= '+� � - .A * 117 , & :-� . (f Z'a r * a � 1. i s g �/ t f- =i b. _ ti '- 1t . _ � ♦► k MC � _ ` " }'✓ ` �, ` r ` /, /�� r- ' *, �' �► / 9 i -,)p � �` 11 J. ' _ i l..16 fi ;t ice: • • i f �f. X { .. f , ice" ? e & � .4# '.Ir-_�� a' + ;¢ fir * % �Ap . t �` >% P+ j +► f f Ys + J {z - ,, � i ,_' �, -. rB-'Is I 'yg• ' ---- - -- --------- \ Al- y ll♦ y `. •• ° - fi • .. .�,.4-1 .,w • ,y' . x ' 1 /'� . � ' V. ` - - - - -- - -- -- •► T ¢, ! _ i I` w -• t: I%. i 1 ` � ?' G s t • S ' •'- '' : � . Y . ._b- __-_,- ` 3,a� ♦ •' ` L: a(' \ _ r *. ' ' 1 , A9@ - Sr - -1. �t q '1 i,A -t��,• - °S --��� i'�i'• �` � s �• r fir. •i, C/] z 1 - l/, _ / _ I `. d� - ;i _1�{I l'7r-209-�_ . -- ----- '� _-_ -_ .moi -. _ v. -.^,[YS}• _- _ _ " -Y. .. \. - - _ - f / �_.yi _ / rl , ' , - J, - - - •/' ` ._..�✓ - -- - - ' �A!-- 4r _tea- - - . 1�_ -- - _ - s� BR'S`_ �-- --,..-''�.-1 ''" - =-!+- ��-.:L-� -.2c- A' I � --- J% J - . �� - - -- -- -- - - ---- - --- -_ _ - - -1 - _� . _ - -. _ -- -. "I 'f __� - -. % - _-r f�-���� � _ ` - ` - _- -- �. ---- ---'- - ---- ---_--- _ -- -'- _- "-- - _ - - y - , - -- -- ' d. ,f,• -- - _ _ ., - - ---- -. - '' '-.:. 1 / � - -' I 1-1 __ _� - _ _ e_ _ - . _ - _ .',, _ ,. � - o..ar._.r_,�-.,4 _ ! � _ ,_.-/ __ _ _�--i , r ,. _ _ ---' .., r-•--•-�.__•„-_•----.,--.-.__.-,-----,-.--.,----. - - - - - --- e , _. - - - • 1 :il _ <- - -. ) - - _ - _ _ _ _ _.� -^ �1'� --- - N 1 r,. - �,_ _ , _._-,^_ ._-'---- - - - D - '"I - -- r - t:" t , - rz 0 , 0 - , i1i i I I ft- ,- . , f iI I ( ...._1 AV-- 'i 1 I I . . . .1 . , - .. .. _- - c .. I - < - . .. -, . -.. -_. _ii :. ..,_.. , t .... .... ,._ - / v �. p I 1 --_ I - • - - , . ;4 q [ :� / - 6L $#5 y 01 -- L. _J t' i f ' - t , y 1' � it . a • Oaktree Drive North Oaktree Drive North b "' r c ' k~. , _ 1. -}., ` .-;� ` `_ , N � - - - - - , ,y I .y��t, T- -� - - - - 1 r ` . ,a ' iY, JOLr�S-• r, OW ,• I� fK` // _ .•ti- y ' -� i.�JF='J`'-i'. b%-.-,�-11 `1L.:r '-v (, J, -i. f - " i - • " - - '. ..- I i �� M<^ •'�..;.�\�,. .. is - -.{ .1P , , 211 �7- tt' F`[ z � r. - - - - lu / - _� - - "o,YY -``B ''1 �- - r� . r �. • � / 4 •- , y `<T- --•\.:_._ 3-- - ,- may- a `tf yr i ;1.��^- Tt• i - �, V-1 - % W. < - . , . . , . ."U. I _. �i k �.. { I J - -- .t jr, .0 A f --�. - - - km- *,--,- W":10�11,i . M_--_ +Future . - -- I i .-- ::::: I - -- ta - I I IF 2 I Future • - - - ": "". 1. * : t, * .. %. I &, - . 10� CV - F' .. "-I.--- ...: ; ." - - - - -;,. . , - ; : . - . . -. '.��' .--I. . q-_ _;,-. - - - -. - - - - - ,- -.. I !� , .- _,�- - - " . , - - . .. .. , .- -, �' - - *0 a a: .�- �. ' t Y - t'' ST '`•' 'kVVIF °, :.•i ♦�.- 1b -n'• E - )rr� v -; �; r i ( S•/ - - :, ..1 . I`�: I . i r . 11 JI .S'.• -i- -f - + I - • fe L' ' +1 ,/ .� I - _ �a ♦ a4 'I"'L _ - ' .. .:Commercial Y �_ 'i4: j! '� - 1 I j i;�nr I►. �,` •�. '+ • i Commercial _. • � fly -r ,.r t_' I - - _ _ y gyp" y - f - - .y _ r--1 G+ : CC -; i , • _ - t11 - I' r_'. G, y. s '� j.. _ • ° �, 'Y K -, tJ' '. . ♦ %C �I 'S• of - .- ! - .. 2 -d: r _- - �`�'�'�f -',ft .' . •. i. ._, . _- ik' L � � •ya,�- --'�A11 > •�•. ._ , .-` ., j .. .. _ ✓ ,, .' ,-_ .s. . . ; I4 f e - . - u t .. - oil. r f'1 O U I�iw�s - - . - r,•a - - ., - j. 0•I L v, I ., , j '� . _ 'Zri° _ �/ F+rl _ 'Y '1*:•' • ,-' .' r • .. 1 F i '� ( Q - $. `� I _ ' �? i . - �;.�+ trt;F t i - �, . - X } . Y1. - � ; , t / - �� r, - `t - �� r _4 n . - - 3 �' • Ir - I' C/ +��'._t. Chinkapin Oak ie' Lane Shumard Oak Lane ! i .:. ;• .: ill ti '.- •+ ,-�,,�,-a., ,; Y fry'^- '' �_ _ _ �" j:: - 5 Cr a-- rte,.•: r dl C I.!' - •F7u . _ :.. -_ w - - - `r _ / _ e .n• n :h�: 'k,., ''.11a. \'I'llbt,`-.+' ! r �- I a - _ ♦ Zt _S _ JT z_ 'r ! --�` - , s :•1 -?-.= - '+t n _. . r - yy �, -t 4'•11 I • - - t9Wpi r y t f• ..� i ,. 'J. '*ii ?h • - . • - T r • ._ ••, .I r . f1- < - - _ ,•.. :, -.' s �. , . 11 . •. -- - _ _ - r -t r , x -. .►. - "I ,.. �;5 ;, - r - �{ t --. -- - - W, Oak Meadow - - - .,1 ' '�, .::* . �, , ive - - ir _. ,\ to ;-1 1 :.i s - y - - ' L rI Ir - '- '. 4:�r, � -< , . . - . - JJ 'Y �' f 5" • i meq_ i l - - -7 C �� L - t %a - �� •tea. �' `•..a- r r 1t _ - .r 110 f .,. i _ �• ^ (.- '�•• J f' 1� - � .5 i -i • s. •yv `� 1rT,1 f•_ - - - �'(j� _-1 11 - - - 't �� - �- i a >s- , «•.4`r -e_ �� of -' R r' 4' ` `, _ - - :. _ t. -- .S:, - / y{.F. i>• f' ' (.; - r � _ . _ _ r- J J _ r- 11 'r/ C: - 7 - •• i•, 1 1** �. �� - -i ta� 0 - `� ;� t �' i �.-_� �-= 4'' 1 -� I - >f-� _ V - _ -1 - -c„ - . �:I Kt .. = b '!) t !_- � r ' i I - 4 �• y { '�, a\ i I j J' !It } � 1' i - 1/ - . I1 L 1�' i&" -- -1,.' *� . - f.- • •fir` - .i .. :-? ?r - - r. ► •'V- 'f'.. _ • 9� 4+'�' `Y- . - .t, �tfyd'�%'r. _t•L'�--h :.- '�'d" ..mss, - - ? W �I I F/�. I--1 O w �, { a3 L + . + �+• _ r '`r <. z, -je _. _ - %- - _ //� - t �'f i$f !' ` 1 low-' t.: tet: - . .ice r y G b / i A. y v� A f ,1 I - <. , . I - _ _• '� _ - - r -#, - - arr xjL� {,.�{.tU'l _ C- _ .S t. L`• '!`-•..4- .i + �* f1 .._.f ,I.�j-_y_ I, - 'gg7��L fy , ate!!, �\ 'I •r-,� ,3 j z i - - Ij _ __ 4 -p �� S�`, I_. .'I 1 I 1 1 { i I �;3 ,-/� i�} 7 �; , t1. (PIF[•'� f , { - f' - i j A, ^ _ - - - - I-�aJ O W 4zt .1 ti -]i . 11 •k 1 -f. i Y - 1. 1.I "\ S/ / t - - , I rs-_. _F1 r . 1- :_r :- •_ A ,J 1 • t ' s .- - _ -S i•'. __ r ftW I t -�].. Fr �rl I� _ __ - I � � - , � /i !e /' ..' O /� ,y �i I�1 I.Ir• � `~ l _ a" 5 '`'_- ,i yr _ . `o - 'cc.- '�.•-, -t.,3�' .. •, .( 11 00% r - �`.ti'� / / - .. _ - y - _ _ i r ' I .1 14 r -t! I • • r �[ SI, it L�1 /, - ''- •. J[t•� v , t •� t" A - + 4 .. , .. �I I_1 • '. .. .. -1 I 11 , .to •.-f -r- * ✓~ _ .,� i -. I - v 11; _ `-1 _ _ _ n � I- T \ s l e • - - t'r T x� - ISI - - a=L��ti :' `.. ` , �> %fir K I I' � t I h _ J r, ` 0 • r r ` i 1 ii I Oil `I I tt-, I - - p h ,r. ' 1. 1 ;.- - S( iNil - � - .. - --, (-o a F..1 V } 1 y q� .` i `a. _ I + ^t. --i 1 1 A -.�' • � i -''�`��l a ~� • ^' a C+ A. _ -. - r "t'• II - _ - .. - �I IV �'t i 1. I �t-' - �, ` J " _ H -I ,: „t �-j.- I --t � -* I I I F 4;x`-~r�a�`• ` , - !-1: I - -, - . I --- -, ,, . ., < I I , - - 4 - -� -1 - [ I lre,� i� . i �, r _ r �.�- 3 I i , * ,:.!j.-.- . - tl- -11.1 - - 1. - -- I div t -.i . - . . . -- - . . . �{. I t I' �� -- I ,i 1lr'� �. a. • :r _. .- - (/\� . , - a `• - _, / k. • ,. I` -7 i I h r I -� r i - r '_'_"• `� [j` tom} ., "- l ; ta.�.y '� i - • ?'� C~` _ .� /.k: �' • i i- _ ,.4jV u' . -,.- - - . .A o- - - -?r'< -a - . :, / 1. .. - _ _ _ __. 1� 0 -_____--__--__ _ _- ---...__ - _-.I _.-. _ 7_ _ s� z41 . ; .- - . -. _ �,J t. S i .'}•+�.{ - Ri i _. -- O U= 6' :S„r.• -F`: Ij / 4.. _ ,i ` - !� : , ; �'s - - A -._ - - r _ - - ---� - - --t - ^.-..r--.•, r-R-...,-�\ yam. .---- �. i3 r.... ••� .r.. z' * I� 1. � r & K - - - -'sem _ . � I • , H � � 0 ) O c T �t� - 3 t : 4!. ti :* -,N , :I' -. :;`.. - - :"1-' - •r i s --- -"' ii. I - , , * rn, - / / - _ :a as i ; ,511 ' •l..: :r'• S f 'Sl '•' / ! - -' - _ - v • - _ _ _ t i .�- y_'.r ''r124-�tl•'. 1 , .- _ H . • - . 6`~ a g "1 'v , �� 1A. , (c J - Ir' 1 • •.,v'. :Li I .. • ^- ; •..• •.- V� `, i� ' . �. - � . , -'W;W. ., ,, .,v_ - II t ..:..i I - .� > - ' '' - - - -. \ I 1. _ _ ' - L• - N O O = O O O N V C 01 . .. --. 4..'- 6i.P, , - .. - .w _ lw i� S `.'�J �. _ ••1 �y- Y• t - . i✓ { -`' :s+r!` t-.i,.r' ;, �' < ,.�,- t' �`�i' -. ♦ -•t _ , I - _ - - --- �r�r - �- _ ' ® ••l7 _ T• )� %i it a ♦ % 1•., - _.�_ /._LTdf . _ l -st - - - - - j , 1 _ F Sr l 7 _ - 1 is-�_ ,. .. -' Lj ;.i-*- - - _-- _ :. -_ l • ♦ (� -i. �t-( .fit s,.• -. -C to � U Q U V _ - e ii - - - 1Y r _ ( t - - ) --Y' 1 - ,ti �' E . �, �'1 I. 'b �', , -A � i i .� _ '1 t i-• ,rt. ' r .K x 'r - - 4- . _ l _ f• I .. ,' - . ' _� a »... s �' :"\ a 1 _: L •Ys _ f - .t 1 - � 1'Y' r , fr. Y i k' r s • . •.i .1a y _ '1'T. L - �' � a . `Tri-- �►,- .'`. •'�, i`C' _ - i^ (rYt_ `4 •� r- ,r ,ii L t ! , -^L• 1 .P t - Y Y- r• r-'. e7 3 .O C J O � E w - - 3. _. #( yl - I .,. y I 1T F � r� . •. e <- - - :+ ;-NOW& - ,._ } r\.:♦ �" J r - - F - d.- Z - --- '�'��' 'fir' _W r i 0 - IILL _ 5:" '� ti -- is -l. -., y %' _ - - DATE - - ._-. - 4, T a' . ,��r���%j�r!� 1�` t � N y rr�' r ,/ l i'a F 1- Mfr ��• r _, fi - - it / / - <�`(- - _ 1- y� aG �S t a a. J _ - - _ - - _ - -- _ - .- - --_- _- - _ y_Yt r -- ' - - '- _ ., - - . 7. - AUGUST 1 2017 .. t� - .`t ♦ 11 -t. �• l ,•H1li•. A! `K - '- ,•y{[. t,_. ;j.�. ¢ i' h ! 1 i'R; .�• 't+..t - 'y> *f 'moi' `��-_- -_- .. _ - . -__ - - - - _ _ _ - -. .. -,a.• '.:r -- - -' �.' - _ - _ _ - a - � - SCALE y (l i'2^ ! / i.' `s ft.. - - -- - - - i"� Ra J I: r eFr - "fy •moi -�'"` i s'. s �,�,; a,..1 - .k ,: ', a' t ,:�1. • - - .- - _ - ° ta+ 1_ -- _ - `i _ - L- c. - .; As Noted .i' .-,L.-4 '�"-.�". - ,j 1.4'' - .. ♦' ..4 4 _•'�' ll •..e -- ,` L-� �� r,r .may.. -. tt`` 0' - �'� " _ - rC ' , ••,;..�J�;- a� S 4-0--t� {� _ <. �. �s1 . . - - •• i 1 _ .?�-! � ` - , - r +r - - - - - JOB NO. . . . _ - . i 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET 0 50 too 200 10/11 1 inch =100 feet • Oaktree Drive North r-16 S 9 - f.� _ sem: �. _ E�r�'� -s �.iii�i � r . ► =i 'r + -� s , � t . 4W A* Oaktree Drive North -7. ��_�$(-iC "-ti.�_ �Y-!. s _ _J� -s-�T i • f - _ - _ - _ _.�. _ - _ • t fit _ - - js- - - -s .... � _�. Jri = - _ f dp Future Commercial b, T m �-�� — %Y/ y 1 •l•'_ : - y' f _ J •'.. - - •=:-�'� = �_ / _ �_- '_' /- ", _� � - � it - - i _ __ i 1 O Chinkapin Oak Lane _71 07- - - r - I _ • "ice-. ` - - i /- - �-- - _ � � r .� �l-i• _ccF F' 1t ,�__ - _ _� -i i - -_ /#. � _ L r d _-->/ ^ S•ri / _ -.>. ���.. _ _ _ y_ -- �� _ _� - _�-�'l _ - ""�' �=_ _ r �r='��i •f'.� � � ''.+�=-� rte - Z i ��---- - y Future Commercial eL _'�� vr- "� �, -/ter '�_'': �i� ; � .'�-• - "+ h- � � __ " 1 =� s- r � f ; �' � � _ - r b " r � -> -� / ? tsa � ' � •t >� � � -.� r =;r -. �� s-.srr 4 i'- /F i is 7. - �" f ` �t f� - - T - - � s - o Jr Ar Shumard Oak Lane uax MCau0w Lrive It -yr + = s fs r - -Oak** OL; • t t � s A�! _ uv°° W) 10 C M M N Q • 00 00 10 4 o C E O O = dU�0_ E.-6 a = 00 a� 3�a, m � C C Z 6 C U0 1 C: Le) L W W W) 0 - DATE DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted 1p r r 4 * JOB NO. V t s � ' i"► ok na 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 SHEET 11/11 1 inch = 30 feet a Awa 1 T 1 INS O x O pro a 0 a � uv°° W) 10 C M M N Q • 00 00 10 4 o C E O O = dU�0_ E.-6 a = 00 a� 3�a, m � C C Z 6 C U0 1 C: Le) L W W W) 0 - DATE DATE August 1, 2017 SCALE As Noted 1p r r 4 * JOB NO. V t s � ' i"► ok na 20160307 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 SHEET 11/11 1 inch = 30 feet LOCATION MAP No Scale EN STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS The Standard Drawings listed on these plans shall be considered a part thereof: ;1 4 0 a C AA—S149 AA—S151 AA -5160 AA -5161 AA -5162 CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR OAK PARK SUBAREA "D" SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 200 0 200 400 SCALE hY FEET Union County 2017 Board of Park Commissioners Columbus and Franklin County Metropolitan Park District INDEX MAP 1 "=200' • "tLCS Proteaion 817 or ►MCE 1-800-362-2764 Gd1JI#e1WD1C Union County F SHEETINDEX Title Sheet and Index Map 1 General Notes 2 Staking Plan 3 Grading Plan 4 Utility Plan 5 DEVELOPER/OWNER OAK PARK, DUBLIN L.L.C. 90 Woodbridge Center Drive Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095 TEL: (732) 750-1111 FAX: (732) 596-8461 SITE SUMMARY TABLE Site Area Lots BENCHMARKS Lots 115-118, Reserve "0" Lots IINAVD 1988) a 123-128 24,245 ALUMINUM DISK IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HYLAND—CROY o 39,367 SF ROAD BRIDGE OVER NORTH FORK INDIAN RUN, 107 FT. SOUTH MASTER BM OF THE C/L OF MITCHELL—DEWITT ROAD. 20 FT. WEST OF THE a C/L OF HYLAND—CROY ROAD. N N Elev = 929.66 A BRASS UNION COUNTY GPS DISK STAMPED "TWP 14" SET IN 0 TOP OF A 12 INCH DIAMETER CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH AN SOURCE BM IMBEDDED REBAR LOCATED 70.8 FT. SOUTH OF RESIDENCE #7895, 31.5 FT. WEST OF CENTERLINE OF HYLAND—CROY ROAD AND 27.9 FT. SOUTHEAST OF A TELEPHONE POLE. o E Elev = 931.48 CHISELED SQUARE ON TOP OF NORTH END OF A 60 INCH BM#1 CONCRETE STORM PIPE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF M MITCHELL—DEWITT ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 750 FT. WEST OF HYLAND—CROY ROAD INTERSECTION. a Elev = 929.34 BM#2 RAILROAD SPIKE SET IN POWER POLE ON THE EAST SIDE OF HYLAND—CROY ROAD, OPPOSITE RESIDENCE #7895. Elev = 931.72 0 u; EN STANDARD CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS The Standard Drawings listed on these plans shall be considered a part thereof: ;1 4 0 a C AA—S149 AA—S151 AA -5160 AA -5161 AA -5162 CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR OAK PARK SUBAREA "D" SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 200 0 200 400 SCALE hY FEET Union County 2017 Board of Park Commissioners Columbus and Franklin County Metropolitan Park District INDEX MAP 1 "=200' • "tLCS Proteaion 817 or ►MCE 1-800-362-2764 Gd1JI#e1WD1C Union County F SHEETINDEX Title Sheet and Index Map 1 General Notes 2 Staking Plan 3 Grading Plan 4 Utility Plan 5 DEVELOPER/OWNER OAK PARK, DUBLIN L.L.C. 90 Woodbridge Center Drive Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095 TEL: (732) 750-1111 FAX: (732) 596-8461 SITE SUMMARY TABLE Site Area Lots 109-114 Lots 115-118, Reserve "0" Lots 119-122, Reserve "N" Lots 123-128 Proposed Single Family Dwelling Units: Building Square Footage: Number of Parking Spaces: Impervious Area per Lot: Open Space Provided: f 2.94Ac 0.91 Ac, 39,367 SF 0.56Ac, 24,245 SF 0.56Ac, 24,245 SF 0.91 Ac, 39,367 SF 20 Varies (See Architectural Footprints) 2 per Unit, min. (In Garage) 70% Maximum Reserve "N" = 0.03 Ac. Reserve "0" = 0.03 Ac. Signature below signify only concurrence with the general purposes and general location of the project and does not constitute assurance to operate as intended. All technical details remain responsibility of the professional Civil Engineer preparing the plans APPROVED: City Engineer, City of Dublin, Ohio Paul A Hammersmith, P.E. Director of Land Use & Long Range Planning, City of Dublin, Ohio Vincent A. Papsidero, FAICP Registered Engineer No. PREPARED BY: Evans, Mechwort, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emht.com Date Date Date U 04 a A a O d" C=�� am M =o^ �m aoo= �aU0 a � � T 0 U t K oma uy U i m m mz C C t a,w2� DATE June 23, 2017 SCALE As Noted JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 1/5 0 CD 22. Pavements shall be cut in neat, straight lines the full depth of the existing pavement, or as required by the City Engineer. Pavement replacement shall be conducted according to City of Columbus Standard Drawing 1441 Dr. A and applicable City of Dublin standard drawings. The replacement of driveways, handicapped ramps, sidewalks, bike paths, parking lot pavement, etc. shall be provided according to the approved construction drawings and City of Dublin standard construction drawings. 3. Accepted methods of providing erosion/sediment control include but are not limited to: sediment basins, silt filter fence, aggregate check dams, and temporary ground cover. Hay or straw bales are not permitted. 4. The Contractor shall provide adequate drainage of the work area at all times consistent with erosion control practices. GENERAL NOTES WATERLINE 5. 1. City of Columbus and Ohio Department of Transportation Construction and Material 23. Tree trimming within the construction zone is to be completed by a certified protected within seven calendar days of the disturbance. Other sediment controls Specifications, current editions, and any supplements thereto (hereafter referred to specifications of the City of Columbus Division of Power and Water (Water). Arborist. At the completion of the project the Arborist is to return and trim any that are installed shall be maintained until vegetative growth has been established. as Standard Specifications), shall govern all construction items unless otherwise All public water pipe with a diameter 3 inches to 8 inches shall be Ductile Iron, Class broken branches as needed. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all temporary sediment noted. If a conflict between specifications is found, the more strict specification will 24. Any modification to the work shown on drawings must have prior written approval devices at the conclusion of construction but not before growth of permanent apply as decided by the City Engineer. Item Numbers listed refer to City of water pipe 20 inches in diameter or larger may be prestressed concrete pipe. Private by the City Engineer, City of Dublin. ground cover. Columbus Item Numbers unless otherwise noted. 25. All inlets shall be channelized. 2. The City Engineer will not be responsible for means, methods, procedures, 26. Park areas shall be fine -graded and seeded with the following mixture: 3. techniques, or sequences of construction that are not specified herein. The City Improved Kentucky Bluegrass, 40% of weight (2 varieties in equal parts) Engineer will not be responsible for safety on the work site, or for failure by the Improved Perennial Rye, 60% of weight (2 varieties in equal 4. Contractor to perform work according to contract documents. parts) Water (Water). Requests for water line chlorination shall be made through the City of Germination Rate: 85% 3. The Developer or Contractor shall be responsible to obtain all necessary permits SANITARY SEWERS Application Rate: 7 lbs per 1000 sq ft as directed by the Division of Contractor. including but not limited to Ohio EPA Permits to Install (PTI) and Notices of Intent Connections to the sanitary sewer will be permitted upon receiving an OEPA Permit l Parks & Recreation, City of Dublin, Ohio. All water lines shall be disinfected according to Item 801.13 of the Standard (NOI), Building Permits, etc. 27. Traffic control and other regulatory signs shall be Type S with a square post 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Dublin Division of Engineering in writing at stating that the project has been constructed as per the plans, and all of the anchor base installation and meet all requirements of ODOT TC -41.20 and Works Association specification C-651, particularly for flushing (Section 5) and for least 3 working days prior to beginning construction. conditions of the PTI have been met. The developer is responsible for obtaining all applicable City of Dublin specifications. 5. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for complying with all federal, state and 28. Street signs shall meet all City of Dublin specifications with lettering colored in in accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material local safety requirements including the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. white displayed over a brown background. Sign tubing shall be brown in color and Specifications. When water lines are ready for disinfection, the City of Dublin shall The Contractor shall exercise precaution always for the protection of persons Sanitary sewage collection systems shall be constructed in accordance with the conform with the Type S. square post anchor base installation requirements of submit two (2) sets of "as -built" plans, and a letter stating that the water lines have (including employees) and property. It shall also be the sole responsibility of the rules, regulations, standards and specifications of the City of Dublin, Ohio EPA, Ohio ODOT TC -41.20. been pressure tested and need to be disinfected, to the City of Columbus, Division of Contractor to initiate, maintain and supervise all safety requirements, precautions UTILITIES and programs in connection with the work, including the requirements for confined 1. The following utilities are known to be located within the limits of this project: spaces per 29 CFR 1910.146. 3. The minimum requirements for sanitary sewer pipes with diameters 15 inch and accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material Columbia Gas of Ohio City of Columbus 6. Following completion of construction of the site improvements and before requesting Operations Engineer Division of Water 6. occupancy, a proof survey shall be provided to the Division of Engineering that 920 Goodale Boulevard 910 Dublin Road, 2nd Floor documents "as -built" elevations, dimensions, slopes and alignments of all elements Columbus, Ohio 43212 Columbus, Ohio 43215 of this project. The proof survey shall be prepared, signed and submitted by the (614) 460-2172 (614) 645-7677 Professional Engineer who sealed the constructions drawings. American Electric Power 7. The Contractor shall restrict construction activity to public right-of-way and areas Rick Eckle Verizon defined as permanent and/or temporary construction easements, unless otherwise 4. Engineering Liaison Coordinator Scott Pfister authorized by the City Engineer. 850 Tech Center Drive 550 Leader Street been accepted by the City Engineer. A tap permit for each water service must be Gahanna, Ohio 43230-6605 Marion, Ohio 43302 8. The Contractor shall carefully preserve bench marks, property corners, reference (614) 883-6829 (740) 383-0527 points, stakes and other survey reference monuments or markers. In cases of willful 5. All in-line line wye and tee connections in concrete sewers, 18 inch diameter and or careless destruction, the Contractor shall be responsible for restorations. City of Dublin 8, Resetting of markers shall be performed by an Ohio Professional Surveyor as Division of Engineering Ohio Edison approved b the Cit Engineer. PP Y Y 9 Gary Smith Ken Richardson, P.E. 1040 South Prospect Street 9. Non -rubber tired vehicles shall not be moved on or across public streets or 6. 5800 Shier Rings Road Marion, Ohio 43302 highways without the written permission of the City Engineer. Dublin, Ohio 43016 (740) 382-7104 9 All water main stationing shall be based on street centerline stationing. (614) 410-4631 10. The Contractor shall restore all disturbed areas to equal or better condition than 7. Wide Open West existed before construction. Drainage ditches or water courses that are disturbed by Time Warner Cable Ken Holderfield 11. construction shall be restored to the grades and cross-sections that existed before Kevin Rich Engineering Manager construction. 1266 Dublin Road 3675 Corporate Drive 11. Tracking or spilling mud, dirt or debris upon streets, residential or commercial Columbus, Ohio 43215 Columbus, Ohio 43231 (614) 481-5263 drives, sidewalks or bike paths is prohibited according to Section 97.38 of the 8. (614) 236-3922 Dublin Code of Ordinances. Any such occurrence shall be cleaned up immediately by 2 The Contractor shall give notice of intent to construct to Ohio Utilities Protection 12. the Contractor at no cost to the City. If the Contractor fails to remove said mud, Service (telephone number 800-362-2764), Producers Underground Protection dirt, debris, or spillage, the City reserves the right to remove these materials and 9. Service (telephone number 614-587-0486), and to owners of underground utilities clean affected areas, the cost of which shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. construction drawings and shall remain in place until the Permit to Install (PTI) has meters or L-6317, A,B,C&D for 1-1/2" or larger meters. that are not members of a registered underground protection service. Notice shall 12. Disposal of excess excavation within Special Flood Hazard Areas (100 -year be given at least 2 working days before start of construction. floodplain) is not permitted. shall be included in the contract unit bid price for the various sanitary sewer 3. The identity and locations of existing underground utilities in the construction area 13. All signs, landscaping, structures or other appurtenances within right-of-way 10. have been shown on the approved construction drawings as accurately as provided disturbed or damaged during construction shall be replaced or repaired to the by the owner of the underground utility. The City of Dublin and the City Engineer 15. satisfaction of the City Engineer. The cost of this work shall be the responsibility of assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or depths of underground facilities the Contractor. shown on the approved construction drawings. If damage is caused, the Contractor 14. All field tile broken or encountered during excavation shall be replaced or repaired 11. shall be responsible for repair of the same and for any resulting contingent 16. connected to the Public storm sewers stem as directed by the City Engineer. 4. aan,and Location, su pport, protection and restoration of all existing utilities and The cost of this work shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. appurtenances, whether shown or not shown on the approved construction drawings, 15. All precast concrete products shall be inspected at the location of manufacture. 12. shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Approved precast concrete products will be stamped or have such identification 5. When unknown or incorrect) located underground utilities are encountered during Y 9 9 17. notingthat inspection has been conducted b the Cit of Columbus. Precast construction the Contractor shall immediate) notify the owner and the Cit , Y Y Y concrte products without proof of inspection shall not be approved for installation. 13. Engineer. 16. Backfill within a 1:1 influence line of existing structures (houses, garages, etc.) or 6. Public street lighting may be in the vicinity of this project. Contact the Cit of 9 9 Y Y P 1 Y public infrastructure (pavement, curbs, sidewalks, bike paths, etc.) shall be Dublin, Division of Engineering at 410-4637, two days prior to beginning work. All storm water detention and retention areas and major flood routing swales shall be compacted granular backfill according to Item 912 of the Standard Specifications or TRAFFIC CONTROL Flowable CDF, Type III according to Item 636. Item 911 of the Standard 1. Traffic control shall be furnished, erected, maintained, and removed by the Specifications may be used elsewhere. Contractor according to Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (OMUTCD), 17. The Contractor shall submit a copy of the approved construction drawings and a current edition. 2. list of proposed precast concrete product manufacturers to the City of Columbus 2. All traffic lanes of public roadways shall be fully open to traffic from 7:00 AM to Construction Inspection Division before commencing construction. 9:00 AM and from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM unless authorized differently by the City Send the information to the following address: Engineer. At all other hours the Contractor shall maintain minimum one -lane Construction Inspection Division two-way traffic. Uniformed, off-duty police officers shall replace flagmen designated City of Columbus by the OMUTCD, and shall be present whenever one -lane, two-way traffic control is 1800 East 17th Avenue in effect. Police cruisers may be required as directed by the City Engineer. Columbus, Ohio 43219 3. If the City Engineer determines proper provisions for traffic control are not being 3. Send a copy of the transmittal letter to the following address: provided by the Contractor, the City Engineer shall assign uniformed, off-duty police Division of Engineering 16. officers to the project at no cost to the City. City of Dublin 4. Steady -burning, Type "C" lights shall be required on all barricades, drums, and 5800 Shier Rings Road similar traffic control devices in use at night. 4. Dublin, Ohio 43016 C76, Wall B, Class IV for pipe diameters 12 inches to 15 inches, Class III for 18 5. Access from public roadways to all adjoining properties for existing residents or 18. All trenches within public right-of-way shall be backfilled according to the approved businesses shall be maintained throughout the duration of the project for mail, construction drawings or securely plated during nonworking hours. Trenches outside 18. public water and sanitary sewer service, and emergency vehicles. The Contractor 5. these areas shall be backfilled or shall be protected by approved temporary fencing shall provide a traffic control plan detailing the proposed maintenance of traffic or barricades during nonworking hours. Clean-up shall follow closely behind the procedures. The traffic control plan must incorporate any traffic control details trenching operation. contained herein. The traffic control plan proposed by the Contractor must be 19. All trees within the construction area not specifically designated for removal shall approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 6. be preserved, whether shown or not shown on the approved construction drawings. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Existing sanitary sewer flows shall be maintained at all times. Costs for pumping Trees to be preserved shall be protected with high visibility fencing placed a Storm sewer outlets greater than 18 inches in diameter accessible from stormwater and bypassing shall be included in the Contractors unit price bid for the related minimum 15 feet from the tree trunk. Trees 6 -inches or greater at DBH management facilities or watercourses shall be provided with safety grates, as Please see Oak Park (public street plan 06 -007 -RES) for Erosion and Sediment items. (Diameter Breast Height) must be protected with fencing placed at the critical root approved by the City Engineer. Control Plan. The Contractor shall furnish all material, equipment, and labor to make connections zone or 15 feet, whichever is greater. Trees not indicated on the approved 1, The Contractor or Developer is responsible for submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) 1. construction drawings for removal may not be removed without prior approval of to be reviewed and approved by the Ohio EPA. The NOI must be submitted to OEPA the Division of Engineering. 45 days prior to the start of construction and may entitle coverage under the Ohio 20. Conduit must be directionally bored across streets instead of open cut, unless EPA General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with construction activity. specifically approved by the City Engineer. Use of pneumatic air ram devices is not A project location map must be submitted with the NOI. A sediment and erosion permitted. Permits to construct in the right-of-way of existing streets must be control plan must be submitted to the City Engineer for approval if a sediment and obtained from the City of Dublin Division of Engineering before commencing erosion control plan has not already been included with the approved construction 2. construction. Should open cutting of existing pavement be permitted, Controlled drawings. This plan must be made available at the project site at all times. The Density Backfill (Type III) shall be used in place of compacted granular backfill, design of erosion control systems shall follow the requirements of Ohio EPA, Item according to Item 636 of the Standard Specifications. 207 of Ohio Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, and the City USE OF FIRE HYDRANTS 2) Lock Joint Flexible Manhole Sleeve as manufactured by Interpace Corporation.l. Engineer. An individual NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit may be required. The 21. The Contractor shall be responsible for the condition of trenches within the Contractor shall be considered the permittee. right-of-way and public easements for a period of one year from the final performed under this contract and provide the city of Dublin a copy of the Hydrant acceptance of the work, and shall make any necessary repairs at no cost to the 2• The Contractor shall provide sediment control at all points where storm water runoff City. leaves the project, including waterways, overland sheet flow, and storm sewers. 22. Pavements shall be cut in neat, straight lines the full depth of the existing pavement, or as required by the City Engineer. Pavement replacement shall be conducted according to City of Columbus Standard Drawing 1441 Dr. A and applicable City of Dublin standard drawings. The replacement of driveways, handicapped ramps, sidewalks, bike paths, parking lot pavement, etc. shall be provided according to the approved construction drawings and City of Dublin standard construction drawings. 3. Accepted methods of providing erosion/sediment control include but are not limited to: sediment basins, silt filter fence, aggregate check dams, and temporary ground cover. Hay or straw bales are not permitted. 4. The Contractor shall provide adequate drainage of the work area at all times consistent with erosion control practices. z O U a A a O d C=�� M 0m moo^ off;- goo= E -6 ota 0o t TK� oma Uy U i. Q n m m •mz 8 C m o'a0 DATE June 23, 2017 SCALE None JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 2/5 WATERLINE 5. Disturbed areas that will remain unworked for 30 days or more shall be seeded or 1. All water line materials shall be provided and installed according to current protected within seven calendar days of the disturbance. Other sediment controls specifications of the City of Columbus Division of Power and Water (Water). that are installed shall be maintained until vegetative growth has been established. 2. All public water pipe with a diameter 3 inches to 8 inches shall be Ductile Iron, Class The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all temporary sediment 53. Public water pipe 12 in diameter or larger shall be Ductile Iron, Class 54. Public devices at the conclusion of construction but not before growth of permanent water pipe 20 inches in diameter or larger may be prestressed concrete pipe. Private ground cover. water pipe shall meet the approval of the City of Columbus Division of Power and BLASTING Water (Water) prior to approval of the construction drawings. 1. The Contractor must obtain a blasting permit from Washington Township Fire 3. Only fire hydrants conforming to City of Columbus standards will be approved for use, Department prior to blasting for rock excavation. The Contractor shall submit except that the nozzle shall be threaded to the barrel of the hydrant. blasting reports upon completion of blasting to the City Engineer, the Owner, and 4. Public water lines shall be disinfected by the City of Columbus Division of Power and the Owner's engineer. Top of rock elevations shall be shown on "as -built" Water (Water). Requests for water line chlorination shall be made through the City of construction drawings. Dublin Division of Engineering. The cost for chlorination shall be paid for by the SANITARY SEWERS Contractor. 1. Connections to the sanitary sewer will be permitted upon receiving an OEPA Permit l 5. All water lines shall be disinfected according to Item 801.13 of the Standard to Install (PTI), and upon receiving satisfactory letter from the design engineer specifications. Special attention is directed to applicable sections of American Water stating that the project has been constructed as per the plans, and all of the Works Association specification C-651, particularly for flushing (Section 5) and for conditions of the PTI have been met. The developer is responsible for obtaining all chlorinating valves and fire hydrants (Section 7). Pressure testing shall be performed required Ohio EPA approvals and paying review fees. in accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material Specifications. When water lines are ready for disinfection, the City of Dublin shall 2. Sanitary sewage collection systems shall be constructed in accordance with the submit two (2) sets of "as -built" plans, and a letter stating that the water lines have rules, regulations, standards and specifications of the City of Dublin, Ohio EPA, Ohio been pressure tested and need to be disinfected, to the City of Columbus, Division of Department of Health and the current edition of Ten States - Recommended Water. The Contractor shall be responsible for all costs associated with the disinfection Standards for Sewage Works. of all water lines construction per this plan. Pressure testing shall be performed in 3. The minimum requirements for sanitary sewer pipes with diameters 15 inch and accordance with Section 801.12 of the City of Columbus Construction and Material smaller shall be reinforced concrete pipe ASTM C76 Class 3, or PVC sewer pipe Specifications. ASTM D3034, SDR 35. Pipe for 6 inch diameter house service lines shall be PVC 6. The Contractor shall paint all fire hydrants according to City of Dublin standards. The pipe ASTM D3034, SDR 35. PVC pipe shall not be used at depths greater than 28 cost of painting fire hydrants shall be included in the contract unit price for fire feet, instead Ductile Iron, Cl. 50 (AWWA 151) shall be used with prior written hydrants. approval by the City Engineer. Pipe materials and related structures shall be shop tested in accordance with City of Columbus Construction Inspection Division quality 7• No water taps or service connections (e.g., to curb stops or meter pits) may be control requirements. issued until adjacent public water lines serving the construction site have been 4. The minimum requirements for sanitary sewer pipes with diameters greater than 15 disinfected by the City of Columbus Division of Power and Water (Water) and have inch shall be reinforced concrete pipe ASTM C76 with Class according to the been accepted by the City Engineer. A tap permit for each water service must be approved construction drawings. obtained from the City of Dublin and the City of Columbus Division of Power and Water (Water) before making any taps into public water lines. 5. All in-line line wye and tee connections in concrete sewers, 18 inch diameter and larger, shall be either Kor-N-Tee or Kor-N-Seal connections conforming to the 8, The Contractor shall notify the Cit of Columbus Division of Power and Water Water Y Y (Water) manufacturers recommendations. at 645-7788 and the City of Dublin Division of Engineering at least 24 hours before tapping into existing water lines. 6. Granular backfill shall be compacted granular material according to Item the Standard Specifications or Controlled Density Backfill according to Item 6366,, Type III 9 All water main stationing shall be based on street centerline stationing. of the Standard Specifications as directed by the City Engineer. 10. All bends, joint deflections and fittings shall be backed with concrete per City of 7. All manhole lids shall be provided with continuous self-sealing gaskets. The Columbus standards. approved construction drawings shall show where bolt -down lids are required. 11. The Contractor shall give written notice to all affected property owners at least 1 Sanitary sewer manholes shall be precast concrete or as approved by the City working day but not more than 3 working days prior to any temporary interruption of Engineer and conform to the City of Dublin sanitary manhole standard drawing. water service. Interruption of water service shall be minimized and must be approved by the City Engineer. 8. All PVC sewer pipes shall be deflection tested no less than 60 days after completion of backfilling operations. All other requirements shall be according to 12. Water meters shall be installed inside proposed structures unless a meter pit Item 901.21 of the Standard Specifications. installation is approved by the City of Columbus Division of Power and Water (Water). 9. Temporary bulkheads shall be placed in pipes at locations shown on the approved Meter pits must conform to standard drawings L-7103, A&B for 5/8" through 1" construction drawings and shall remain in place until the Permit to Install (PTI) has meters or L-6317, A,B,C&D for 1-1/2" or larger meters. been issued by the OEPA and the sewers have been approved for use by the City 13. Water lines to be installed in embankment areas shall be placed after the Engineer. The cost for furnishing, installing, maintaining, and removing bulkheads embankment has been placed and compacted according to the Standard Specifications. shall be included in the contract unit bid price for the various sanitary sewer i ms. M� 14. Curb stop boxes shall be located at least 2 feet inside the right-of-way or 1 foot 10. sanitary sewers including sanitary sewer service lines shall be subjected to and inside of sidewalk towards the curb and set at finished grade. pass infiltration or exfiltration tests according to Item 901 of the Standard 15. If the top of the operating nut of any valve is greater than 36 inches below finished Specifications and must be approved for use by the City Engineer before any grade, an extension stem shall be furnished to bring the top of the operating nut to service connections are tapped into sewers. within 24 inches of finished grade elevation. 11. For sanitarysewer infiltration leakage through joints shall not exceed 100 gallons 9 9 1 16. All water lines shall be laced at minimum depth of 4 feet measured from to of P P P per inch of tributary sewer diameter per 24 hours per mile of length or the P ry P P 9 finished grade to top of water line. Water lines shall be set deeper at all points where computed equivalent. All sanitary sewers shall be tested. necessary to clear existing or proposed utility lines or other underground restrictions 12. At the determination of the Cit Engineer, the Contractor may be required to , Y 9 Y q b a minimum of 18 inches. Y Perform a TV inspection of the sanitarysewers stem prior to final acceptance by 17. Two 3/4 inch taps shall be installed within 2 feet of the end of a line on all the City. This work shall be completed by the Contractor at his expense. dead-end water lines. 13. Visable leaks or other defects observed or discovered during P TV inspection shall be STORM SEWERS re aired to the satisfaction of the Engineer. P 9 1. All storm water detention and retention areas and major flood routing swales shall be 14. Roof drains, foundation drains, field tile or other clean water connections to the constructed to finish grade and hydro -seeded and hydro -mulched according to Items sanitary sewer system are strictly prohibited according to Section 51.23 of the 203 and 659 of the Standard Specifications. Dublin Code of Ordinances. 2. Where private storm sewers connect to public storm sewers, the last run of private 15. All water lines shall be located at least 10 feet horizontally and 18 inches storm sewer connecting to the public storm sewer shall be Reinforced Concrete Pipe vertically, from sanitary sewers and storm sewers, to the greatest extent conforming to ASTM Designation C76, Wall B, Class IV for pipe diameters 12 inches to practicable. Where sanitary sewers cross water mains or other sewers or other 15 inches, Class III for 18 inches to 24 inch pipes, and 27 inches and larger pipe utilities, trench backfill shall be placed between the pipes crossing and shall be shall be Class II, unless otherwise shown on the approved construction drawings. compacted granular material according to Item 912 of the Standard Specifications. Inspection is required by the City of Dublin's Division of Engineering. In the event that a water line must cross within 18 inches of a sanitary sewer, the sanitary sewer shall be concrete encased or consist of ductile iron pipe material. 3. Granular backfill shall be compacted granular material according to Item 912 of the Standard Specifications or Controlled Density Backfill according to Item 636, Type III of 16. Service risers shall be installed where the depth from wyes to proposed ground the Standard Specifications as directed by the City Engineer. elevation exceeds 10 feet. Tops of risers shall be no less than 9 feet below proposed ground elevation if basement service is intended. 4. All storm sewers shall be Reinforced Concrete Pipe conforming to ASTM Designation C76, Wall B, Class IV for pipe diameters 12 inches to 15 inches, Class III for 18 17. Where service risers are not installed, a minimum 5 -foot length of sanitary sewer inches to 24 inch pipes, and 27 inches and larger pipe shall be Class Il, unless service pipe of the same size as the wye opening shall be installed. p p Y p 9 otherwise shown on the approved construction drawings. 18. The Contractor shall furnish and place, as directed, approved wye poles made of 2 5. Headwalls and endwalls shall be required at all storm sewer inlets or outlets to and inches x 2 inches lumber at all wye locations, ends of extended services, or at the from stormwater management facilities. Natural stone and/or brick approved by the end of each riser where risers are required. Wye poles shall be visible before City Engineer shall be provided on all visible headwalls and/or endwalls surfaces. acceptance by the City. The cost of these poles shall be included in the contract unit price for the various sewer items. 6. Storm inlets or catch basins shall be channelized and have bicycle safe grates. 19. Existing sanitary sewer flows shall be maintained at all times. Costs for pumping 7• Storm sewer outlets greater than 18 inches in diameter accessible from stormwater and bypassing shall be included in the Contractors unit price bid for the related management facilities or watercourses shall be provided with safety grates, as items. approved by the City Engineer. 20. The Contractor shall furnish all material, equipment, and labor to make connections MAIL DELIVERY to existing manholes. The sewer pipe to manhole connections for all sanitary sewers 1. The Contractor shall be responsible to ensure that U.S. Mail delivery within the project shall be flexible and watertight. All holes shall be neatly cored. The sewer pipe limits is not disrupted by construction operations. This responsibility is limited to barrel at the springline shall not extend more than 1 inch beyond the inside face relocation of mailboxes to a temporary location that will allow the completion of the of the manhole. To maintain flexibility in the connection, a 1 -inch space shall be work and shall also include the restoration of mailboxes to their original location or left between the end of the pipe inside the manhole and the concrete channel; this approved new location. Any relocation of mailbox services must be first coordinated space shall be filled with a waterproof flexible joint filler. Any metal that is used with the US Postal Service and the homeowner. shall be Type 300 Series Stainless Steel. The connection may be any of the 2. Before relocating any mailboxes, the Contractor shall contact the U.S. Postal Service following types: and relocate mailboxes according to the requirements of the Postal Service. A. Rubber sleeve with stainless steel banding. 1) Kor-N-Seal as manufactured by National Pollution Control Systems, Inc. USE OF FIRE HYDRANTS 2) Lock Joint Flexible Manhole Sleeve as manufactured by Interpace Corporation.l. The Contractor shall make proper arrangements with the Dublin Service Department 3) Or equal as approved by the City Engineer. and the Columbus Division of Water for the use of fire hydrants when used for work B. Rubber gasket compression. performed under this contract and provide the city of Dublin a copy of the Hydrant 1) Press Wedge II as manufactured by Press -Seal Gasket Corporation. Usage Permit obtained from the City of Columbus. The Contractor shall also send a 2) Dura Seal III as manufactured by Dura Tech, Inc. copies of permits obtained from Dublin and Columbus to the Washington and/or Perry 3) Link -Seal as manufactured by Thunderline Corporation. Township Fire Department. Permits shall be kept at the construction site at all times. 4) Or equal as approved by the City Engineer. 2. Before the final estimate is paid, the Contractor shall submit a letter from the City of The cost for this work along with a new channelized base for the manhole shall be Columbus Division of Water to the City Engineer stating that the Contractor has included in the unit bid price for the related items of work. returned the Siamese Valve to the City of Columbus and has paid all costs arising from the use of the fire hydrants. z O U a A a O d C=�� M 0m moo^ off;- goo= E -6 ota 0o t TK� oma Uy U i. Q n m m •mz 8 C m o'a0 DATE June 23, 2017 SCALE None JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 2/5 DO / 1 RESERVE "J" N _ 4 _ _ T I S05°1i o R25 N 43.76' a 91.90' RE ERVE/'J" j R/ Ends I 9 128 IN 6930.01 SF 23' -I 56' R/W r - a a 14' 13'13' 28' 3-B � \ O U � 0 O y U L O Z v C 104.67' m 3 Radius a i o --1 I 12.84' C2 I I� ' 6803.31 SF m 60.00' CN I - - - 904 N 0 505'18'59"E Ic c 6803.31 SF -- I 1 Easement Line I l T^ T Building Line & I I I - C C L I I a w i 104.67' o o 0 I o1�Of I 0° vi aei00 N W o u it I ±0.91 Ac. Building Line (Typ) I o 0 N I T �/ I g I NO �o I r I r I I I I o I � 23' -I 56' R/W r - a a 14' 13'13' 28' 3-B � \ O U � 0 O y U L O Z v C Cow I C�o ON E_ L •- 104.67' +' Building Line (Typ) 127 6279.98 SF 104.67' m 3 Radius Length i o --1 I 12.84' C2 °co 126 3 w I� M 6803.31 SF I N = J 60.00' CN 9 - - - Easement Line N 0 505'18'59"E Ic c 6803.31 SF -- I 1 Easement Line ±0.91 Ac. l T^ T Building Line & I J I - C C L I I a w i 104.67' o o I o1�Of I 0° vi aei00 W o u it ±0.91 Ac. Building Line (Typ) o 0 N T �/ g I NO �o I I Cow I C�o ON E_ L •- 104.67' +' Building Line (Typ) 127 6279.98 SF X Ef N 104.67' m 3 Radius Length If --1 10' Building Line (Typ) 12.84' C2 °co 126 3 w - Q 6803.31 SF I N = J 60.00' CN 10' Building Line & - - - Easement Line N 0 505'18'59"E 28' c 6803.31 SF -- -104.67' -- 10' Building Line & 1 Easement Line ±0.91 Ac. l 125 Building Line & 6803.31 SF X Ef N _ _ 3 Radius Length ssw��S• Croalk oY (Ty 12.84' C2 U u 0 - Q - -1i I N = J 60.00' CN C4 � 14.00' N I 14 N N 104.67' + io 124 6279.98 SF 104.67' po io 123 6270.18 SF 9' Building Line (From Edge of Sidewalk) '59"E 3 _ w I w 430.50' 2 N m - - - 1 - - 0 4 - - - 3 _ _ v m Nl � 1 Qf N N S05°18'59"E 2 wlw 430.50' 1 LL, w OAKTREE DRIVE NORTH (Private Street) OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH (Private Street) �I� Lou I w R25- N 'PIS, � I 50' �I R/W I Nt 4' I I I B B I I 25' Io 25' 1 I I III , - 3 Radius Length C1 oY 14.00' 12.84' C2 17'01'14" 60.00' 17.82' C3 9'22'58" 60.00' I N N 104.67' + io 124 6279.98 SF 104.67' po io 123 6270.18 SF 9' Building Line (From Edge of Sidewalk) '59"E 3 _ w I w 430.50' 2 N m - - - 1 - - 0 4 - - - 3 _ _ v m Nl � 1 Qf N N S05°18'59"E 2 wlw 430.50' 1 LL, w OAKTREE DRIVE NORTH (Private Street) OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH (Private Street) �I� Lou I w R25- N 'PIS, � I 50' �I R/W I Nt 4' I I I B B I I 25' Io 25' 1 I I III , IN Curve Table 10' Delta Radius Length C1 52'32'50" 14.00' 12.84' C2 17'01'14" 60.00' 17.82' C3 9'22'58" 60.00' 9.83' C4 52'32'50" 14.00' 12.84' I 14 28' 6803.31 SF N 1 L IQ) l 10' Building Line & - - - Easement Line- - 0 I h IN Curve Table Curve # Delta Radius Length C1 52'32'50" 14.00' 12.84' C2 17'01'14" 60.00' 17.82' C3 9'22'58" 60.00' 9.83' C4 52'32'50" 14.00' 12.84' E I 12 12 I I, of a- 0' II FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA i to ^ (BY OTHERS) I J 1 RESERVE "A" N o i 1 (nm I) �I L Q I 0 I� I I "^ 2 II BB IIIQ m II'14- �I II 1 1 II O I� I N, II ID o Z W I T 10' w a) g� Y) �> 1 o a< M+ 0 + I I o g I ! III 1 110' 0l �1 112'1 112'1 Q I 125' 25' FUTUREYOTHERS) AREA ( 1 I RESERVE "D" I : W Ian I I I� Lri o v LL No Parking Sign (Typ) N RESERVE "J" m m RESERVE "I" N _ o m _ �_ 2 _ S07 2_6 "15 E 1 _ _ �r S0578 59 E 0 - SO_578 59 L- d 2 S03 °71 43 E 1 m 0 - m SOS_18 59 150.81 ' - T 54.04' N m 76.52' 76, 52' N m 54.04 " - -~ - - N - W CHINKAPIN OAK LANE (Private Street) SHUMARD OAK LANE (Private Street) S057859'E 150.81' m �u S=18'S9"E X05-TB'5S E- ,p O 41.00' 0 5.00' 55.00' 55.00' T 6. 4'2 ti� 55.00' 55.00' 0 55.00' 41.00' `S`�9. \ mss. ;r b �o� 0 10 Esmt \s �� 10' Esmt _ "io \ o 00 ZI 5 ` 10' Building 50 10' Building 80 IZ o O Line (Typ) R/W Line (Typ) 0' 0' 6 6' 6' 3 1 w 6' T 6' 6 b 12' -12'- 6- 6' 0' w w ^ �. B B 122 0 121 120 0 119 N i l Z 118 117 s 116 115 3 B B 0 0 5627.64 SF o 5725.64 SIF a a 5725.64 SF o 5692.30 SF m rn 5692.30 SF o 5725.64 SF 4 5725.64 SF a 5627.64 SIF o 0 a Z ±0.56 Ac. 8.8 ' _. _. 83' ±0.56 Ac. Z o a m 6' 6' i w Ik 1' Sidewalk Esmt 55.00' N m m 12' Crosswalk Prop Parking (7 Space Striping - m CN N m -9 O) ~_ (TYP)(By Developer) TH N05.18'59"W d --------------------------- 4 -r STOP R1-1-30 Stop Sign & Stop Bar at. curb return (Typ) Curb Ramp (Typ) l- Building Line (Typ) Ex Ramp m 8 n ro - 281.33' - (Typ) - � I n-- 24" Stop Line (Typ) �No Parking Sign. NO PARKING ANY TIME R7-1-12 12" Crosswalk (Typ) Street Marker Name Sign (Typ) TYPICAL INTERSECTION STRIPING AND SIGNAGE Scale: None I 125' 25' \I/ e m 12' Crosswalk N m + - O 6 (Typ) OAK MEADOW DRIVE 246.50' (Public Street) T i_ All Easements hereon were recorded on the existing Plat PB 5, pg 260 A -D Burr Oak Lane, Shumard Oak Lane, Chinkapin Oak Lane, Acorn Lane, and Oak Park Blvd. shall be posted "No Parking" on both sides of Road. DEVELOPER/OWNER OAK PARK, DUBLIN L.L.C. 90 Woodbridge Center Drive Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095 TEL: (732) 750-1111 FAX: (732) 596-8461 6' 1' Sidewalk 6' - Building Line (Typ) / Proparkin P 9 Space Striping 5 281.33' (TYP)(B' Devel T i f � i h ,ti m oper) � m 4 12' Crosswalk (Typ) N -Y P) 109 6930.43 SF io 104.67' 110 6279.98 SF RESERVE "I" _ _ 0 _ R25' 43.76'/ \\ ,p O n \ RESIERVE 'I" g• I /R/W E ds I 1.20 13. ns a"I c ami la� ao�l avail I I4 � 1 23' °I 56' g• I R/W io 104.67' 0 m v 10' Building Line (Typ) Cc z 13' I 14 28' 6803.31 SF N 1 L 10' Building Line & - - - Easement Line- - 0 505'18'59"E 104.67' o 10' Building Line & Easement Line 112 6803.31 SF ±0.91 Ac. Building Line (Typ) 104.67' io 113 6279.98 SF io 104.67' 114 6269.75 SF r9' Building Line (From Edge of 1' Sidewalk 1 Sidewalk) 89.671kir 01 a - �t N m Lr) Cr: m N - - o� OI o 0 m v W Cc z 13' I 14 28' B -B 1 Nt r I \ 12' Crosswalk (Typ) ZONING Zoned PUD - Planned Unit Development Oak Park Plan Sub Area "D" LEGEND Reserve Area " 14 Existing Back of Curb (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. Existing Sidewalk Reserve Area "N" (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. 4' Walk (To Be Installed with the construction of each individual structure) Concrete (To Be Removed) 4' Walk and/or Curb Ramp (By Developer) I DATE June 23, 2017 I SCALE 1" = 30' JOB NO. 20160307 SHEET 3/5 TO East Basin D \ 31.89 931.56 931.56 931.77 931.59 931.53 931.82 931.53 931.58 931.82 931.53 931.59 931.77 931.56 931.56 931.89,9 87 / TO East Basin E 929.20 1 00y = 929.20 s31.B7 o f / yr = TC 931.69 h'� \ o7-C951o / N '�� N \ N _ _ .57 N \ _ r � nj �� -929 /`S / / 931.24 9311.24 / 0.50% 931.271 931.21 931.22931.21 931.12 931.21 931.27 931l124 931.24 / / ,57 0.50% g� 0.50% 0.50% (76 09 `2, 0.50% 0.50% //91• 0.50% 0.50% �1 0.50% 1.00% �4 HP 3 H =2 `� HP 1 CJ 0 931.07 4 HP 3 V HP 2 `J 1 - X 9 - F- - ■ - J X - - - - \ HP 0 930.92 1P 2a LP 930. 01P LP 930.85 TP LP ILP X85 1P LP 930.801P [ 930.92 TP / \ I 1.00% / ESQ% TC9J05s / res3o.7B res3o.so TC 930.53 OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH l a 93159 OAKTR E DRIVE NORTI rc930.43 0 / \ x / X / + �X / 931.21 931.20 x TC 930.68 X931.59 \ / \ / �\ 931.59 931 931.38 / 931.4 931.20 931.5 'f � 931.52 931.20 931.47 931. 9 X931.39 931.\59x -x_9 / \ \ \ / x931.73 931.54% �, _ X?31.72 931.72% x932 05 / 932 O5X 931.75 931.75 931.85 931.85 9131.85 931.50 931.55 931.. �, X X X X X X X R 7-' �I� \- - / / -928-00 \� N. Lo Lot Line \ / of / o Setbaccg \ \ / \ o ��� \ \ \ h \ rn 10' Esmt 1' Sidewalk Esmt \ \ o Ln �, I� 1 ,1 of I 128 1 o w ° 1 1 ai Y 6 Pad=933.4 o rn \ E Ln i X o 0 109 rn w o w �, r 0+ Pad=933.2 A n 3s w o a Garage a House Pad a`o� I 0 o rn\ 10l m w / i T w I I iii h i XLm 127 � � I I / / / I 6' Bldg Setback y �� I � � 110 \ Pad=933.0 I I // 0 I I I Pad=933.0 v 1 �1 ST / Lot Line 3:l 0 a -- -- -- a 3 6 32.5 i .� \ / l 3 6' d C', OM O U w ILL�i 100ori2Nw \L I0)o o0) mn 0)mw Note:100.00=Finished Floor N w oil o Y ^ ^ - 126 i 92 a \ ^N] J ;1 I� w Pad=933.1 0 lol \\ m 1 Mo% 1 1 1 111 �I of 0 ^ v ^ a� ^ m Pad=933.3 n O 0.l Q Y M \ w v N m o\ Driveway ¢ CL rn / 31.90 x ° \\ // �\ O Garage House Pad orch 1T i rn s31.so a1 \\ 571 67, ass ICJ o - / �9 t1.2' Max Difference from EPTYPICAL of Pri Private SSECTION oTo of Curb of Public Street " cN 20' Esmt E \ / �N a --$-- -- / m Nt rn rn rn o "- ' P N+ E 20 Esmt N* / w FUTURE COMMERCIAL AR ii Scale: 1 -20 o w -- -� rn rn (BY OTHER / ° I ~ ~ O o tTo / 0I O' \\ FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA N o Ono A W o / 125 O RESERVE "A" ° \\ (BY OTHERS) RESERVE/ rn 0 112 ^I rn O S # Pad -933.0 z i� / Pad=933.0 o 6 o 6 F a O 95 -x-- g3JW5 931. k3 I / \1.22 33 931.33_ 93L�23 931.26 91.26 931.23 831.33 931.04 93133 93L22 J 6 0 [y TC 930.37 62 L00% `1 87 86 1.00% RESERVE "" 1.00% RESERVE "J" 1.00% 1.00% `J ` 1.00% �� .00% �J X P y 1 �� 11 1.00% 84 0 60, TC 930.32 �� 1.00% i O HxP-� 2 p 1`� HPC HP 2 , t � �� 1.00% g30.677P�1 00% LP 9 67TP LP 930.66 TP LP 4 LP 039 g6TP g3067TP LP 930.677\ [p -- --�-- MJ X X - CHINKAPIN OAK LANE TC 930.32 Xcs3o.4 TC930.SX Tc 930.42 SHUMARDXOAK LANE TC 930.41 X \TC 930.35-----�- +O / 0 0 10' Esmt - 10' EsmtLo \ \ a / 6 113 °° a 124 N N 30 _ �q d� �Y _ D W CD \ W / � I x^ � to Pad 933 0 Pad 933.0 ^110 -4 o ° A x X F h \--------- _------�--- �% O or v ' 2 � h 122 121 120in C4 119 9�0' 118 117 116 115 ° Pad=933.1 Pad=933.0 Pad=933. Pad=933.1 o i / ad=933.0 ad=933.0 Pad=933.0 Pad=933.0 a. \ 123 --- ° of h Pad=932.9 �1 930 -_ --930-- N \\ 0 'n 0 114 N l - \ Pad=933.0 N X U n e Ion 7 / \ _ N c.�� j xx - / \ 1' Sidewalk f m 1' Sidewalk �o" om�� -- - �- \ Esmt rol J rnl Esmt \ ---X�0 oc8A 11 �m x.83 931.50 I 931.41 \�"' _ �\ 7 \932_08 �I \4 I I x 93218 \ '' I I \ I I "' 931.51 I x.65 932.09x / I � �O ` / 84 �o �� �� ISI S zoo E 9 931.28 F 9X-116 J1.22 o 931.99 �' 932.24 x x 932 34 I'' "I 932 09 4 931.32\9J31.26 931.28 31.40 932 05��, 93213 ©t T a 931.96 J \xL �c �X '� x ° > c 0.75% Tc93o.19 \ 1 0.50% = _ HP o - 10 � 9 o LP 81I\\ 71 �� OAK MEADOW DRIVE I 5 II � Oy II I Tcs3o.47 ° rQ� 1.00% v . - - 1 _ + - .} + HP - i- - i - 4 - - o 930.85 7P 3 ` F - 2 OHP 931.811P 30.74 TP 1 1 1+ 1 // O - \� �� �� - - - - OZ m TC 930.80 \ / 93219 1P \ LP 93211 TP ©c c C TC 930.94 p a g a 1 �� �e / l 5 Mti 6 �F 11 11 \ x 11 '9J1. 84 1_ �t TC 931.931 ---------------- ---- --- 931.19 1� / �� 9 L y, 6 ----- 931.29-------�+ T,9371.03 -----------931.47 -- --- 93202---T 932- 9 DATE ------------------------------------------------------------ ---931.99 �72--_ 93202 ---- --/931.57 931.22�T--------------------------- 6 \ /-----931.7------- 931.45 T 931.20 931.63 _ 93218 _ � �� i 93221 - i v - 1.89 / 93211 93237 93220 931. __ �_ _ I' ___ _ _ _ \ 931.36 931.61 - ,..1 93211 / - 1 J /y } 9: T June 23, 2017 To West Basin C 1 00y = 929.32 Epi N m U •• I Inn 30 0 30 60 S 0 00 0 N >m SCALE IN FEET 0 04 8% Maximum Drive Slope 1% Minimum Side Yard Slope LEGEND Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Water Main Electric Telephone and Cable +xxx.xx Existing Ground Elevation xxxx.xx Proposed Ground Elevation Pad=XXX.X Finished Floor Elevation Major Flood Route To West Basin C 1 00y = 929.32 Note: Grades along roads are Top of Curb unless otherwise noted. Scni.F Existing utilites are shown from "Record Drawing" information Reserve Area "0" 1"=30` (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. Existing spot elevations are shown from original plans except for top of castings which are from "Record Drawings" Reserve Area "N" End of Sanitary Service elvations can be found on Sheets 3 JOB NO. (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. thru 8 of the Sanitary Improvement Plan for Oak Park 20160307 (CC -14964). All Utilities shown on this sheet are existing. SHEET No Roadway Ponding. 4/5 � Ex 8" San \ J� Ex 8" San (� — J 44 — — 3 —'57 3 Ex 12" Stm 2 OAKTREE DRIVE NORTH J 128 N X I L I I I I IL -IIID I II II o tF 127 1r� `1Y I SOT II, \J x 1 " S_l -- - x San J IIIervice (Ty P) o E U I� I in w l l z g J E 126 x z �I + W w ry JLij 0 Q L — — JII --�— - I I EP1 Stn Ex 15" Sim i a- -- N ��-- IF -20' Esmt E Nt 0 xLd E Lh w o n O o N N o J 125 w m 01 x Water o c ervice (Typy 60, x / T 1 w LL" - >E --->F I� x Wat r ervice(TBAb / X11J -4� 124 0 a - �I I I --Z— — E CnJ x NM 123 w a= J//1, it E WI--- Ea — _ i m / N X 3 E• _ 0 N f wll p 70 - - -9 - EJ c m -- ---- - -- - a � � - a K -- VL �y - N\l 00 Exesan c0 o co ao .+ N C EI N w U Wn 30 0 30 60 00 0 N >m SCALE IN FEET N FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA (BY OTHERS) RESERVE "A" \1 i Ex 15" Stm / T o 122 RESERVE "J" 15' =Stm— _ CHINKAPIN OAK LANE 0 0 121 120 Ex 8" San y 0 � Ex 12" Stm Ow `i `F E Ex 12" Stm ISI ISIX 0 LU 62 Fx 15" Stmt— � 10' Esmt 119 C J� 2Ex 12" Stm 3 001 ' OAKTREE DRIVE SOUTH E--- --- ---/ i� M z 0I �I w Illi Q 109 w o a W CJI Ex Saln w Servic (Typ) `�1�� � 110 ==-X X I LL] 1 g o A o NI o l 3 J w, mLJ U1 + O I� hI I� � I ILII FUTURE COMMERCIAL AREA (BY OTHERS) 63) (8 7) 0 Ex 12" Stm 2 86, RESERVE °I" Stm SHUMARD OAK LANE 10' Esmt o 0 I 'I i i 13 00 118 117 116 (@0 ---- Ex 24" Sim Ex 2 " St (73) N —74, �75rc `i' 20' Esmt `Nt ---- - N*--�- E w RESERVE "D" 112 o C wH �I.0 J l c� O Ex 12'i Stm fi * py py Ex Water ery Si a (Typ)I I � a F EO --- �T �z N I r 115 w 0 L 9 1 0 114 'e"I /I N v m L e c t b III 1 Sidewalk 1' Sidewalk Fqmf 1 J Fcmi --c0 c0 - III I 1 —I I— - OAK MEADOW DRIVEI X8 x1 71 0 6 1 5 Ix x1 4 Ex 1Service1 San Ex San l Pro 6" 1 (TBA) P� _ �L, Service I T San Service I I I -- 1 e SV L1 � (' y — P T San Service 1I IX VL r----------------------------- -4; ,----------------------------------- - 'T Ex 8° San LEGEND Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Water Main Electric Telephone and Cable ---X ---x ----* Existing Water Service Existing Water Service (To Be Abandonded) Existing Sanitary Service X Existing Sanitary Service (To Be Abandonded) /i c c m � a O i F -- — V) DO "a 8. °cj� / \ w o o = E E , - a t2 } E r.i 3 ©t u \ \ a 2 c =001 E N N L w n U — n CD .3 2 p ww _ ammo X — — — — m Z w D WS O Ex 8" WM� F- -- TATE + D J1 Ex 8" San47'June 23, 2017IT NOTES Proposed Utilities = 1-6" San. Service to Lots 118 & 119. All other utilities shown are existing. Only 1 water and sanitary service shall be utilized per lot. A cleanout shall be constructed on the sanitary service when making connection. All other water and sanitary services are abandoned in place. SCALE 1" = 30' Reserve Area 110" JOB NO. (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. 20160307 Reserve Area "N" (Open Space) 1473.28 S.F. SHEET 5/5 RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 73 T RU 108, RESERVE "B" AND RESERVE "C" OF OAK PARK Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Washington (Franklin County), City of Dublin, and in Virginia Military Survey Number 6595, containing 2.922 acres of land, more or less, said 2.922 acres being a resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, both inclusive, and Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of the subdivision entitled "Oak Park", of record in Plat Book 5, Page 260A - D, said Lots and Reserves being conveyed to OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC by deed of record in Official Record 769, Page 638, Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio. The undersigned, OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, by JEREMY HALPERN, Managing Member, owner of the lands platted herein, duly authorized in the premises, does hereby certify that this plat correctly represents its "RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 73 THRU 108, RESERVE "B" AND RESERVE "C" OF OAK PARK", a subdivision containing Lots 109 to 128, both inclusive, and areas designated as Reserve "N" and Reserve "O", does hereby accept this plat of same. The undersigned further agrees that any use or improvements on this land shall be in conformity with all existing valid zoning, platting, health or other lawful rules and regulations, including applicable off-street parking and loading requirements of the City of Dublin, Ohio, for the benefit of itself and all other subsequent owners or assigns taking title from, under or through the undersigned. Easements are hereby reserved in, over and under areas designated on this plat as "Sidewalk Easement". The aforementioned designated easement permits the construction, operation, and maintenance of all public and quasi public utilities above, beneath, and on the surface of the ground and, where necessary, is for the construction, operation, and maintenance of service connections to all adjacent lots and lands, for storm water drainage and for the construction and maintenance of a sidewalk for use by the public. In Witness Whereof, JEREMY HALPERN, Managing Member of OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC, has hereunto set his hand this _ day of 20. Signed and Acknowledged OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC In the presence of: By JEREMY HAT PERN, Managing Member STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF FRANKLIN ss: Before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared JEREMY HAT PERN, Managing Member of OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC, who acknowledged the signing of the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed and the voluntary act and deed of said OAK PARK DUBLIN, LLC, for the uses and purposes expressed herein. In Witness Thereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this _ day of , 20 My commission expires Notary Public, State of Ohio Approved this Day of 20_ Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning, Dublin, Ohio Approved this Day of 20 City Engineer, Dublin, Ohio Approved this day of , 20_, by vote of Council, wherein all of this plat is accepted as such by the Council of the City of Dublin, Ohio. In Witness Thereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this day of , 20 Transferred this day of , 20 Filed for record this _day of , 20 at M. Fee $ File No. Plat Book Pages Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio Auditor, Union County, Ohio Recorder, Union County, Ohio 2 LOCATION MAP AND BACKGROUND DRAWING NOT TO SCALE SURVEY DATA: BASIS OF BEARINGS: The bearings shown hereon were transferred from a field traverse originating from and tying to Franklin County Geodetic Survey control monument 6648 and McNeal, having a bearing of South 15' 07' 53" East between said monuments, and are based on the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone, NAD83 (1986 Adjustment). SOURCE OF DATA: The sources of recorded survey data referenced in the plan and text of this plat are the records of the Recorder' Office, Union County, Ohio. IRON PINS: Iron pins, where indicated hereon, unless otherwise noted, are to be set and are iron pipes, thirteen sixteenths inch inside diameter, thirty inches long with a plastic plug placed in the top end bearing the initials EMHT INC. PERMANENT MARKERS: Permanent markers, where indicated hereon, are to be one -inch diameter, thirty -inch long, solid iron pins. Pins are to be set to monument the points indicated, and set with the top end flush with the surface of the ground and then capped with an aluminum cap stamped EMHT INC. Once installed, the top of the cap shall be marked (punched) to record the actual location of the point. SURVEYED & PLATTED BY Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Scientists 5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Toll Free: 888.775.3648 emht.com We do hereby certify that we have surveyed the above premises, prepared the attached plat, and that said plat is correct. All dimensions are in feet and decimal parts thereof. o = Iron Pin (See Survey Data) • = MAG Nail to be set Q = Permanent Marker (See Survey Data) Professional Surveyor No. 7865 Date '711.911 1110/f.9rel 1we] =N11LAWAGi 1: 1'19= FIT:# 4IMS '0111111111111 W1111T7=111OVA I 1 2 f17 i17�1:� ��1 7:�Ii71 �:T1xAfI ChBrg=S47'27'38"E Ch=9.81' A=52'32'50" R=14.00' Arc=12.84' ChBrg=S69'02.340E Ch=12.39' I I I I I I I I I I I I I )� I . V1 d I t N 190 1 I dIa I I I I I I I z RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 73 T RU 108., RESERVE "B" Z RESERVE " J„ / I I rn I I � 128 0.160 Ac. I J I 1 II S05'18'59"E I 104.67' x I z m 3 I ICO m� 127 m °� 00 o v 3 0.144 Ac. N rn I j 0 Z I Nrtf O? I OJ 0 o16 o ° F � I S05-1 8'59"E 1 104.67' I I I I I ° 126 0 O Pmr 0.156 Ac. - 0 I I Existing Easement 5 - - P.B. 5 P 260 S05.18' 59"E 104.67' - -10' Easement Existing P I P.B. 5 260 I I � 125 P 0.156 Ac. I 0 0 II II 505' 1 S' 59"E 104.67' M I CILI x I 124 bi rt O � U,� II O 00° i° 0.144 Ac. - Orn 0 -vim N rn� N £ N I O F 505'18'59"E 104.67' I 1 I I 123 P io 0.144 Ac. I ao m I I r I Existing 1' Sidewalk 1 Easement I P.B. 5 , P, p 26 - ?�?��� N05'18'59"W 89.67 SCALE: 1 " = 30' 3020 10 0 15 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE (in feet) B.L. = Building Line AND RESERVE "C" OF OAK PARK INDEX OF LOTS IN OAK PARK (P. 5, P. 26 I --4 ChBrg=S36'49'40"W 108 I - I 107 33 Arc=12.84' // 106 RES "A„ -- ChBrg=S5W24'36"W- U, 05 - I� 104 f I� 103 rn °� 0 o 0 I om 31 b 102 0 ° O IN "J" - RES 101 OA - D) TO BE RESUBDIVIDED - -----T� 30 100 I I990 U o� j 29 I 98 0-)P�U� J97 OAK MEADOW DE RIV i i �3T35734 T379;mu�o�,Te) 37'� I IO I � x I RESERVE "A„ I � � N O old RESERVE "�9r.---I C �.J 505'18'59"E 222.83 55.00' - 16.83' 55.00' - h9 55.00' __� -� �� 41.00'- 1 Existing 10' Easement m P.B. 5 P 260 II n. m (n m O i 0 � -- o� o0 o aoo s Z 1 m '� W 1 M A ;P `° 1 B t0 o a o o cn �A A 119 01� o 121 0 0 120 M 0.131 Ac. 1 o 122 - r^ 0 m 0.131 Ac. 4: .131 Ac. 1 0.129 Aa 1 Existing 1' Sidewalk Easement P.B. 5 , P 260 B.L. 46.83' _55.00= - - 55.00'- - - - -- woS18'59"W 211.83 OAK PARK I I P.B 5, P 260 A -D RESERVE D>> RESERVE A S05' 18.59"E 222.83' 41.00' , 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' _ - - 10' Easement 16.83' _ - - Existing P.B. P 260 5 y Z 1 OD 1. 1 r �o �I ODuo 5 0 �, 11 o I N _ 00 116 0.129 Ac. f C" o f 1 17 0 0 0.131 Ac. 0 o C 2- 118 0 0 0.131 Ac. 0 0.131 Ac. O N 3I 1 Existing 1' Sidewalk Easement 5 260 - N -67. 9 aT� 55.00' - - Aj, 55.00' -- - %&. ss• - - -46.83'- - - - - N05'18'59"W 211.83 RESERVE x, am I o -ao I N N I o3 I ° r I I 111 o b� I I 0.156 Ac. I N 10' Easement O Existing P 260 I P.B. 5 N061 8'59"W I 104.67' I y� Existing 10' Easement I I P.B. 5 P 260 I I � 112 I I 0.156 Ac. I I I cr I (T I I S05'18'59"E I 104.67' I I \ li z x co ` �. m � 109 0.160 Ac. 318' 5y 104.67' 110 0.144 Ac. 318'Sy 104.67' N. ChBrg=S36'49'40"W Om S O Ch=9.81' I A=5732'50" R=14.00' Arc=12.84' // \ -- ChBrg=S5W24'36"W- U, 1 Ch=x.39' - -{ 1 I I m -a ° I I m f J I I I X I I I rn °� 0 o 0 I om subdivision, are subject to the requirements of the approved zoning -07 N rt� I 0 ° O IN F I I I 1 I I 1 N � I � N. Om S O I 113 0.144 Ac. O I NOTE "E" - FENCES: Fences, where permitted in the Oak Park U, 9 feet as shown hereon m -a ° m f N 3 I m O F I om subdivision, are subject to the requirements of the approved zoning Side: 6 feet where adjacent to I S05'18'59"E 104.67' 1 I 1 development text and the City of Dublin, Ohio zoning code. � I � 114 mi° r O / a' I 0 0.144 Ac. Lot No / 0 Existing 1' Sidewalk Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" and Reserve I Easement 1361602029000 0.105 Ac. 91 P.B. 5 260 right-of-way comprised of the following Union County Parcel Numbers 3900280140380 1361602028000 0.057 Ac. O . '"W 967' N0518598 Rear: - NOTE "A": The purpose of this plat is to show certain Map Numbers: NOTE "J" - MINIMUM SETBACKS: Zoning regulations for 3900280140370 1361602027000 Resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of 93 platting, utility service for electric power is provided by AEP and Lots 109, 115, 122, 128 Oak Park in effect at the time of platting specify the following property, rights of way, and easement boundaries as of the time dimensions for the minimum front, side and rear yard setbacks for Existing 3900280140360 1361602026000 each lot as follows: 94 Ohio Edison and telephone service is provided by AT&T and Lots 110-114, 116, 117, 120, 121, 123-127 MEADOW DRIVE _ I NOTE "E" - FENCES: Fences, where permitted in the Oak Park Front: 9 feet as shown hereon OAK D subdivision, are subject to the requirements of the approved zoning Side: 6 feet where adjacent to - P.B. 5`5 p . 260A - Existing development text and the City of Dublin, Ohio zoning code. residential lot, 9 feet where NOTE "C" - ACREAGE BREAKDOWN: Resubdivision of Parcel Number Map Number Acreage Lot No NOTE "F" - UTILITY PROVIDERS: Buyers of the lots in the adjacent to a public Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of Oak Park is 3900280140390 1361602029000 0.105 Ac. 91 Resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" of right-of-way comprised of the following Union County Parcel Numbers and 3900280140380 1361602028000 0.057 Ac. 92 Oak Park subdivision are hereby notified that, at the time of Rear: 10 feet NOTE "A": The purpose of this plat is to show certain Map Numbers: 3900280140370 1361602027000 0.057 Ac. 93 platting, utility service for electric power is provided by AEP and Lots 109, 115, 122, 128 property, rights of way, and easement boundaries as of the time Existing 3900280140360 1361602026000 0.057 Ac. 94 Ohio Edison and telephone service is provided by AT&T and of platting. At the request of zoning and planning authorities at Parcel Number Map Number Acreage Lot No. 3900280140350 1361602025000 0.057 Ac. 95 Frontier North. Front: 9 feet as shown hereon the time of platting, this plat shows some of the limitations and p g' p 3900280141080 1460404021000 0.109 Ac. 73 3900280140340 3900280140330 1361602024000 1361602023000 0.108 Ac. 0.096 Ac. 96 97 NOTE "G": per City of Dublin Zoning Code, all lots within Side: 6 feet where adjacent to ential lot requirements of the zoning code in effect on the date filing 3900280141070 1460404020000 0.058 Ac. 74 3900280140320 1361602022000 0.058 Ac. 98 Resubdivision f Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve , and Reserve lud of 0 feerest where adjacent to this plat for reference only. The limitations and requirements re 3900280141060 1460404019000 0.058 Ac. 75 3900280140310 1361602021000 0.058 Ac. 99 b the terms, conditions, restrictions (including Oak Park are subject re Reserves I and J may change from time to time and should be reviewed to 3900280141050 1460404018000 0.058 Ac. 76 3900280140300 1361602020000 0.058 Ac. 100 e lighting and house sizes) and special assessment districts as outlined "Oak Rear: 10 feet determine the then current applicable use and development 3900280141040 1460404017000 0.058 Ac. 77 3900280140290 1361602019000 0.058 Ac. 101 in the preliminary plat entitled Park" and the development limitations of the zoning code as adopted by the government 3900280141030 1460404016000 0.120 Ac. 78 3900280140280 1361602018000 0.118 Ac. 102 text. Lots 118 and 119 authority having jurisdiction. The then applicable zoning code 3900280141020 1460404015000 0.118 Ac. 79 3900280140270 1361602017000 0.120 Ac. 103 NOTE "H"- SCHOOL DISTRICT: At the time of platting, all Front: 9 feet hereon shall have control over conflicting limitations and requirements 3900280141010 1460404014000 0.058 Ac. 80 3900280140260 1361602016000 0.058 Ac. 104 of Resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" and Reserve "C" Side: as shown 6 feet where adjacent to that may be shown as on this plat. This note should not be 3900280141000 1460404013000 0.058 Ac. 81 3900280140250 1361602015000 0.058 Ac. 105 of Oak Park is in the Dublin City School District. residential lot and construed as creating plat or subdivision restrictions, private use 3900280140990 1460404012000 0.058 Ac. 82 3900280140240 1361602014000 0.058 Ac. 106 Reserves N and O restrictions, covenants running with the land or title 3900280140980 1460404011000 0.058 Ac. 83 3900280140230 1361602013000 0.058 Ac. 107 Rear: 10 feet encumbrances of any nature, except to the extent specifically 3900280140970 1460404010000 0.096 Ac. 84 3900280140220 1361602012000 0.109 Ac. 108 NOTE "I": At the time of platting, electric, cable, and identified as such. 3900280140940 1460404007000 0.108 Ac. 85 telephone service providers have not issued information required plat 3900280140930 1460404006000 0.057 Ac. 86 NOTE D RESERVES O AND N - „: Reserves O and so that easement areas, in addition to those shown on this p as Said zoning regulations g g and an amendments thereto passed y NOTE "B" : At the time of platting, all of the land hereby 3900280140920 1460404005000 0.057 Ac. 87 "N", as designated and delineated hereon, shall be owned and deemed necessary by these providers for the installation and subsequent to acceptance of this plat, should be reviewed to being platted as Resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve "B" 3900280140910 1460404004000 0.057 Ac. 88 maintained b an association coin rised of y p the owners of the fee maintenance of all of their main line facilities, could determine the then current requirements. This notice is solely for and Reserve "C" of Oak Park is in Zone X (Areas determined to 3900280140900 1460404003000 0.057 Ac. 89 simple titles to the lots in the Oak Park subdivisions for open conveniently be shown on this plat. Existing recorded easement the purpose of notifying the Platting, of certain zoning public of the existence, at the time of regulations applicable to this property. be outside of the 0.2% annual chance flood lain as designated p g 3900280140890 1460404002000 0.105 Ac. 90 space and landscape features. p p information about Resubdivision of Lots 73 thru 108, Reserve This notice shall not be interpreted as creating plat or subdivision and delineated on the FEMA Flood Insurance Map for Franklin 3900280140880 1460404001000 0.114 Ac. Res. C B and Reserve C of Oak Park or any part thereof can be restrictions, private use restrictions covenants running with the land County, Ohio, and Incorporated Areas, map number 3900280141210 1460405001000 0.114 Ac. Res. B acquired by a competent examination of the then current public or title encumbrances of any nature, and is for informational 39049COOI8K with effective date of June 17, 2008. records, including those in the Union County Recorder's Office. purposes only. 1 RFSIIRnivi., nN nF InTS 7.3 THRII 158 RFSFRVF "R" ANn RFSFRVF "C" nF nAK PARK 951FT-157 RECORD OF ACTION Ciiy of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. PUD — Oak Park Subarea D - Townhomes Oak Meadow Drive 17-028Z/PDP/FDP/PP/FP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat/Final Plat Proposal: A rezoning of 2.94 -acres from PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for Townhomes) to PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for single-family lots) to convert four, three-story townhome buildings with 36 units to 20 detached, single-family homes and all associated site improvements. The site is on the west side of Hyland Croy Road, approximately 700 feet southwest of the intersection with Brand Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Preliminary and Final Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. This is also a request for review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Christopher T. Cline, Blaugrund, Kessler, Myers & Postalakis. Planning Contact: Logan Stang, Planner I. Contact Information: (614) 410-4652, Istang@dublin.oh.us MOTION#1: Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded to approve this Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan, because it meets the future land use, thoroughfare plan, and special area plan as outlined in the Community Plan along with the preliminary development plan review criteria, with one condition. 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require Lots 118 and 119 to use the same architectural model mirrored across Oak Park Boulevard, prior to City Council review. *Chris Cline agreed to the above condition. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Cathy De Rosa s Robert Miller es Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes MOTION #2: Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded to approve this Final Development Plan, because it complies with the applicable review criteria and the existing development standards, with four conditions. 1) That the existing non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits; Page 1 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov RECORD OF ACTION City of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. PUD — Oak Park Subarea D - Townhomes Oak Meadow Drive 17-028Z/PDP/FDP/PP/FP Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat/Final Plat 2) That the applicant choose a bench that coordinates with the existing benches near the community center, prior to building permitting; 3) That the applicant revise the landscape plan (sheet 6/11) defining the location of proposed plantings, bed edges, and diversifying the landscape materials, subject to staff approval, prior to City Council review; and 4) That the applicant continue to work with staff to outline installation requirements for the fence details, prior to building permitting. *Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes MOTION#3: Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded to approve this Preliminary Plat/Final Plat, because it complies with applicable review criteria and the requirements outlined in the Subdivision Regulations, with two conditions. 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal; and 2) That the applicant add a note to the Final Plat outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves, prior to City Council submittal. *Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6-0. RESULT: This Preliminary Plat/Final Plat will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Logan Stang Stephen Stidhem Yes Planner I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov City of Dublin OHIO, UST MEETING MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, July 13, 2017 AGENDA PUD — Oak Park Subarea D - Townhomes Oak Meadow Drive 17-028Z/PDP/FDP/PP/FP Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan (Recommended for Approval 6 — 0) Final Development Plan (Approved 6 — 0) Preliminary Plat/Final Plat (Recommended for Approval 6 — 0) 2. BSD C—Towne Place Suites by Marriott 17-044BPR 3. BSD SRN - Bridge Park Block H 17-OSSSPR 5155 Upper Metro Place Basic Plan Review (Approved 6 — 0) John Shields Parkway/Dale Drive Site Plan Review (Approved 6 — 0) 4. PUD - Mcltitrick, Subarea 1A - Dublin City Schools 5175 Emerald Parkway 17-059Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan (Recommended for Approval 6 — 0) Final Development Plan (Approved 5 — 0) S. BSD P— Downtown Dublin Parking Garage Plat 75 North High Street 17-068PP/FP Preliminary Plat/Final Plat (Recommended for Approval 6-0) The Chair, Victoria Newell, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led the Pledge of AVlegiance. Other Commission members present were: Chris Brown, Cathy De Rosa, Deborah Mitchell, Stephen Stidhem, Amy Salay, and Bob Miller. City representatives present were: Vince Papsidero, Phil Hartmann, Claudia Husak, Logan Stang, Lori Burchett, Michael Hendershot, and Flora Rogers. Administrative Business Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to accept the documents into the record. The vote was as follows: Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; and Ms. Salay, yes. (Approved 7 - 0) PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 —Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 19 The Chair briefly explained the rules and procedures of the Planning and Zoning Commission. She stated the following cases are eligible for the Consent Agenda this evening: TownPlace Suites by Marriott; Bridge Park, Block H; McKitrick, Subarea 1A; and Downtown Parking Garage Plat. She said there would be a slight deviation from the normal procedures this evening to hear the cases in the following order: 4, 5, followed by any cases left on the Consent Agenda and lastly would be Oak Park. She stated that she and Amy Salay have a conflict of interest with the McKitrick case so they will recuse themselves for that portion of the meeting. She said Deborah Mitchell has a family emergency and can only attend the McKitrick case. She said the cases will be recorded in the order they were presented on the Agenda. 1. PUD — Oak Park Subarea D - Townhomes 17-028Z/PDP/FDP/PP/FP Oak Meadow Drive Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat/Final Plat The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is for detached, single-family homes and all associated site impro townhomes where permitted. She said the site is on the west`si 700 feet southwest of the intersection with Brand Road. She said of approval to City Council for Rezoning with a Preliminary De% Zoning Code Section 153.050 and a review and recommends Preliminary and Final Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision request for a review and approval of a Final Development Plat Section 153.050. She noted anyone intending on addressing the Plan portion of this application will need to be sworn in. ` The Chair swore in anyone rezoning of 2.94 acres to permit 20 Dents where previously three-story of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately s is a request for a recommendation pment Plan under the provisions of 1 of approval to City Council of a gulations. She stated there is also a rider the provisions of Zoning Code mmission for the Final Development regard to this case. Logan Stang reported this case was reviewed and tabled at the June 8th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. During that meeting, he said, the Commission expressed concern regarding the main entrance for the community with the loss of the open space reserves along with the fence appearance and landscape details for the private alleys. He reported the applicant has since revised the proposal addressing both the comments as well as meeting a number of conditions from the previous report. Mr. Stang presented the Planned Unit Development Process Overview and noted this application consists of all formal stages of a PUD review including the rezoning that establishes the development standards through the Final Development Plan. Mr. Stang presented an aerialview of the site and said the proposal is for the conversion of six townhome buildings to 20 single-family lots within the existing Oak Park subdivision. He presented the proposed site plan and indicated the proposal is fairly consistent with what was previously reviewed comprising of 20 single-family lots using rear -loaded garages on the current private alley system. The applicant has addressed previous conditions, he reported, requiring a 9 -foot, front yard setback as opposed to 6 feet that was previously proposed as well as additional landscaping for all fences abutting the alleys. Mr. Stang said the biggest change is at the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Oak Meadow Drive and pointed that out on the slide. He explained the applicant has reduced the four lots on the north and south sides of Oak Park Boulevard to 55 feet in width in order to provide two smaller reserves at that intersection. He said the reserves allow for additional open space with a landscape treatment that creates an entry feature and accents the community center. The reserves still result in a loss of private open space but well exceeds the required open space for the community as a whole. He reported the applicant Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 —Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 19 has also determined that both Lot 118 & 119, located at the intersection, will use the same architectural model to further enhance the entrance to the community and this requirement will be added to the development text prior to City Council's review. Mr. Stang presented a rendering of the proposed Reserve Landscape Plan that showed a mixture of plant materials to provide openness and symmetry outside the community center. He said the proposal includes four benches and a landscape hedge with masonry columns to define the private realm from the public realm. He indicated that Staff is requesting that the applicant use a more complimentary bench to what exists near the community center and that the landscape details be refined prior to City Council review. Mr. Stang presented a rendering of the reserve landscaping to show the perspective from the end of the private drives as one enters the neighborhood approaching the community center in the center. This provides a conceptual idea, he said, of the proposed plantings with the mirrored architectural model. Mr. Stang said the other main concern was the inconsistent fence design and treatment along the private alleys. He presented the applicant's revised proposal of the fence details that allow only the lattice -style fence at a height of six feet in the locations noted. For the properties with additional frontage on public streets, he explained, a four -foot solid fence is permitted that is also noted on the slide, which only pertains to a couple of lots in this development. Mr. Stang added, this, in addition to the Ian the rear of these lots while providing a scree develop. He indicated that Staff is requiring west to prevent backyard space from having Mr. Stang presented a rendering showing the Road. He noted the rendering showed the with landscaping beside the private drives. In addition, the Plat has also been ownership and maintenance. I provide a cohesive treatment for )r when the commercial properties their outdoor amenity areas to the the homes from the entrance at Hyland -Croy Jal property and the proposed fence details the dedication of reserves to the HOA for Mr. Stang concluded there would he three motions required by the Commission this evening. He said approval is recommender) for the Rezoning with the Preliminary Development Plan with one condition to be forwarded to City Council: 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require Lots 118 and 119 to use the same architectural model mirrored across Oak Park Boulevard, prior to City Council Review. Mr. Stang said approval is recommended for the Final Development Plan with four conditions: 1) That lots 109 and 128 orient their outdoor amenity areas toward the western property line, subject to verification at building permitting; 2) That the non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to the City, prior to the submittal of building permits; 3) That the applicant choose a bench that coordinates with the existing benches near the community center, prior to building permitting; and 4) That the applicant revise the landscape plan (sheet 6/11) defining the location of proposed plantings, bed edges, and diversified landscape materials, subject to Staff approval, prior to City Council review. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 —Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 19 Mr. Stang said approval is recommended to City Council for the Preliminary and Final Plats with two conditions: 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the Plat are made prior to City Council submittal; and 2) That the applicant add a note to the Final Plat outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves, prior to City Council submittal. Chris Cline, attorney with Blaugrund, Kessler, Myers & Postalakis Law Firm in Worthington, representing the applicant, said Linda Menerey, EMH&T, was also present to answer questions. He asked that the aerial view be shown again to show the context of the site to the surrounding areas and he noted the measured distances to provide the Commission with a better perspective on what would actually be visible. He remarked on the amount of work involved in changing the 6 -foot setback to the 9 -foot, front yard setback. He said they previously proposed the 6 -foot setback because it was written in the development text but somewhere along the line, that was changed to zero. He emphasized those townhomes have a zero setback now so they are actually going from zero to 9 instead of 6 to 9 feet. Mr. Cline clarified that fences are now required; this is not an option for the buyers. Linda Menerey added that the four -foot fence is really the bottom half of the six-foot fence as it does not include the lattice portion on top. Mr. Brown asked if the four -foot fence is being required, to which Mr. Cline answered affirmatively. He said the four -foot and six-foot fences will all be consistent and the color white was originally considered but finally decided on light beige. Mr. Cline said he thought they resolved the issue of the condition in the Final Development Plan, to which Mr. Stang agreed. With regard to outdoor living spaces, Mr. Cline noted the chamfered corner, which moves the house towards that eastern building, line where there is no setback because there is a significant reserve. Ms. Menerey explained how they revised the landscape plans and the green space. Mr. Cline indicated they plan to have one or two spec homes built for potential buyers to see at the initial entry and they would incorporate landscaping as well. Mr. Brown asked for Staff's perspective on Lots 109 and 128. He indicated that if the open side of those homes is not put towards the street then one is looking at a bigger, blanker wall upon entering the community. Mr. Stang said that was true and indicated Staff thought the six-foot fence would be required but part of Staffs concern was the clarity of whether the four -foot fence was optional or if it was a requirement. He said the concern was outdoor items that might be stored in the area that directly faces Hyland -Croy Road, which has high visibility for a heavily traveled thoroughfare and Staff thought that would be a detriment from the aesthetic perspective. With the additional landscaping, he concluded that Staff would be comfortable with what is proposed as the landscape will soften that viewpoint. Steve Stidhem indicated he thought swing sets might be what staff is referring to when talking about outdoor items. He said he didn't share this concern with staff but figured that was the intent of the condition. The Chair called for public comment. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 —Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 19 Prasad Vempati, 7031 Greenland Place, thanked the applicant for their effort based on the number of conditions the Commission raised last time. Walking on those same streets every day, he said, the unevenness that the proposal creates, concerns his family. He explained that on one side of the street, there is a seven -foot tree lawn space from the curb to the walkway and on the other side the tree lawn space is four feet from the curb to the walkway. He said this prompts an uneven visual aspect on the same street. He added on one side of the street there is a 14 -18 -foot setback and on the other side there is a 9 -foot setback. As he imagines himself every day, living in that place, walking through the streets, he said those conditions create a very uneven view. He concluded he is concerned about resale value. He said this is a unique situation but does not want to see a situation where the City is trying to put a square peg into a round hole. Since there was no one else from the public that wanted to speak public portion. Cathy De Rosa requested clarification on the comments just heard fl and tree lawns. Mr. Cline responded he had a hard time understandir of the public streets in the subdivision are being changed; the onl setbacks from those public streets. Right now, he restated, the sE proposing to change the setbacks to nine feet. Ms. De Rasa asked Cline emphasized that everything they are doing in Subarea D is th setback in the rest of Oak Park is a minimum of 13 feet or maximti four -foot difference between their development standard of 9 feet ar the Village and Park homes in Oak Park. He said some of the homes conflicts with the current infrastructure, which could impact the persp Mr. Stang explained the reason for different ti parking and this is one of those existing conditior Mr. Stidhem inquired about the deterioration of as part of maintenance. He asked if there is an reconstruction and repainting. Mr. Cline said the been turned over yet. He indicated the HOA wo, the fence. the Chair closed the m the resident about the sidewalk what that issue is. He stated none things they are changing are the lacks are zero feet and they are F the setbacks are consistent. Mr. same at 9 feet. He explained the of ±21 feet. He added there is a a minimum setback of 13 feet for rd to be set back further based on ey are associated with on -street work with. over time and then fixed, replaced, or repainted HOA in this area and if they would enforce any be a very strong and active HOA, it just has not the appropriate body responsible for maintaining Mr. Stidhem clarified he was more concerned with the enforcement of paint color and style. Mr. Cline said that would be part of the Final Development Plan. Mr. Stang added the fence appearance would be a Code Enforcement issue as well.; Victoria Newell thanked the applicant for addressing the Commission's comments from the last meeting as well as the public's. She said that what the applicant presented for open space this evening is very nice. She said she is very comfortable with the position of units for Lots 109 and 128, especially with the additional amenities such as the fence and landscaping. She recommended removing that condition from the final development plan. Ms. De Rosa wanted the fencing requirement to be clearer. Mr. Stang indicated there is a provision in the text that addresses that issue but staff will review it with the applicant. Ms. De Rosa said it makes sense to not use a bright white color for the fencing; a creamy white will make a real difference. She emphasized the exact color name and number should be included in the text. Mr. Cline said a better place to put that information is in the Final Development Plan and will ensure that information is included. The Chair asked Staff if that was acceptable. Mr. Stang said Staff can work with the applicant to ensure those details are provided. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 —Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 19 Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with one condition: 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require Lots 118 and 119 to use the same architectural model mirrored across Oak Park Boulevard, prior to City Council Review. The vote was as follows: Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Recommended for Approval 6 — 0) The Chair requested to see again the four conditions of approval for the 1) That lots 109 and 128 orient their outdoor amenity areas t subject to verification at building permitting; 2) That the non -operational street light at the southwest carne Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to building permits; 3) That the applicant choose a bench that coordinates with community center, prior to building permitting; and 4) That the applicant revise the landscape plan (sheet 6/11) t plantings, bed edges, and diversified landscape materials,',subj Council review. Based on the discussion, Mr. Stang added as follows: 1) That the non -operational street light at thi Meadow Drive intersection is made operati( building permits; 2) That the applicant choose a bench that community center, prior to building permittir 3) That the applicant revise the landscape t plantings, bed edges, and diversified landsc r of the the City, lopment Plan: western property line, chell-Dewitt Road/Oak for to the submittal of existing benches near the ting the location of proposed to Staff approval, prior to City #1 be removed and a new condition be lthwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak at no cost to the City, prior to the submittal of nates with the existing benches near the (sheet 6/11) defining the location of proposed materials, subject to Staff approval, prior to City 4) That the applicant continue to work with Staff to outline installation requirements for the fence prior to b Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to approve the Final Development Plan with the amended four conditions. The vote was as follows: Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Approved 6 — 0) Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the Preliminary and Final Plats with two conditions: 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal; and 2) That the applicant add a note to the Final Plat outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves, prior to City Council submittal. The vote was as follows: Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Recommended for Approval 6 — 0) City of Iblin OHIO. usn PLANNING REPORT Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, July 13, 2017 Oak Park PUD, Subarea D — REZONI NG/PRELMI NARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT/FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FINAL PLAT Agenda Item 1 Case Number 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP Proposal Rezoning of a 2.94 -acre site from PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for Townhomes) to PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for single-family lots) to covert four, three-story townhome buildings with 36 units to 20 detached, single- family homes and all associated site improvements. Request Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Preliminary and Final Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. This is also a request for review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Location On the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 700 feet southwest of the intersection with Brand Road. Applicant Christopher T. Cline, Blaugrund, Kessler, Myers & Postalakis. Case Manager Logan Stang, Planner I 1 (614) 410-4652 or Istang@dublin.oh.us Recommendation Approval of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan to City Council The proposed rezoning meets the future land use, thoroughfare plan, and special area plan as outlined in the Community Plan along with the preliminary development plan criteria. Planning recommends approval of this request with one conditions. 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require Lots 118 and 119 to use the same architectural model mirrored across Oak Park Boulevard, prior to City Council review. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 2 of 18 Approval of a Final Development Plan In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteria and existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this request with four conditions. 1) That Lots 109 & 128 orient their outdoor amenity areas toward the western property line, subject to verification at building permitting; 2) That the existing non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits; 3) That the applicant choose a bench that coordinates with the existing benches near the community center, prior to building permitting; and, 4) That the applicant revise the landscape plan (sheet 6/11) defining the location of proposed plantings, bed edges, and diversifying the landscape materials, subject to staff approval, prior to City Council review. Approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat to City Council The proposal complies with the preliminary and final plat criteria and the requirements outlined in Subdivision Regulations. Planning recommends approval of this request with two conditions. 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal; and, 2) That the applicant add a note to the Final Plat outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves, prior to City Council submittal. ye+ten• .. e City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 3 of 18 intbcnooi. 17-02minary Development Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan/ O 200 400 Preliminary Plat/Final Development Plan/Final Plat City of Dublin Oak Park Subarea D Feet Oak Meadow Drive City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 4 of 18 *Area ] t2.9 acres Surrounding Zoning North: PUD, Planned Unit Development —Oak Park, Subarea A (Single-family and Uses residences) Site Features South: Jerome Township (Glacier Ridge Metro Park) East: PUD, Planned Unit Development — Oak Park, Subarea E for commercial (Vacant) West: Jerome Township (Farmland and Glacier Ridge Metro Park) Existing public street network with access from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Existing private drive system abutting the rear of all townhome properties. Vacant property approved for townhomes with utility box connections along the private drives. Two private reserves on either side of Oak Park Boulevard. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and tabled this application at their June 8, 2017 meeting. During the meeting, the Commission expressed concern regarding the entrance of the community with the loss of the reserves and landscape details with the proposed fence designs along the alley. The Commission requested the applicant create a cohesive landscape design at the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Oak Meadow Drive. Additionally, the Commission requested the applicant to require one fence design with a landscape treatment along the private alleys to ensure an aesthetic appearance until the commercial properties develop. The applicant has reduced the lot widths fronting Oak Meadow Drive to 55 feet in order to provide two reserves at the intersection of Oak Meadow Drive and Oak Park Boulevard. The reserves will have a consistent landscaping treatment to emphasize the entrance and provide private open space for the community. The applicant has also provided a landscape treatment for all fences along the private alleys and has required the fence be limited to a consistent design using the lattice design for all single-family homes. Neighborhood Staff conducted an on-site discussion with residents of the community on May Contact 31, 2017 regarding the proposal. The discussion focused around the smaller lots, fence treatment along the private drives, development of the commercial properties, and open space. Staff encouraged the residents to compile comments for review by the Commission and City Council and to attend any public meeting for this application. The residents have also been in contact with the applicant both prior to and during the review of this application. WS ■ City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 5 of 18 The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and provided informal feedback for three options to convert 36 townhome units to single-family lots within Subareas D & E on November 10, 2016. The Commission supported the conversion to single-family homes and encouraged the applicant to pursue developing this and the commercial properties together. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved an amended final development plan to modify an approved fence material incorporated into the streetscape on February 17, 2011. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved an amended final development plan to modify the development text to allow a one foot front yard setback for the townhome units located in Subarea D on August 7, 2008. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved a final development plan and final plat for the subdivision and development of 108 residential units on a ±60 acre site on March 15, 2007. City Council reviewed and approved Ordinance #74-06 to rezone approximately 61 acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Oak Park) for the development of 108 residential units, approximately 40,000 square feet of mixed-use space, and 31 acres of open space on November 20, 2016. A rezoning to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) requires approval of a—] development text to serve as the zoning regulation; the Zoning Code covers all requirements not addressed in the development text. A preliminary development plan is also required. A rezoning is required in a district already zoned PUD when permitted uses, development standards, or geographic area are unable to be met through other provisions (minor text modifications or administrative approvals). Proposal The proposal is for the conversion of six, two-story townhome building pads permitting a total of 36 units to 20 single-family residential lots within the existing Oak Park development. The proposal uses the existing infrastructure to provide frontage on public right-of-way with vehicular access from private drives. The 20 single-family homes will use similar materials and architectural details to blend into the existing community and create a cohesive development. Community Plan Northwest/G/acie r Ridge Special Area Plan zoning with The Community Plan shows the future land use for this site as partially Mixed Residential Low Density and the remainder as Mixed Use Neighborhood Center. The residential classification is intended to provide a mix of housing options while transitioning from existing single-family neighborhoods with a typical density of 3 City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 6 of 18 Preliminar M1vN , flwOmlial Larhntny �'� I Y M.U. qn rw'�nm -uaoeYy Low Y.".y flswn.�1 units per acre. The neighborhood center is fln.IFT+anilni . intended to provide daily retail and personal services for the neighborhood in which they are located. Building heights generally range from one to two stories and would coordinate with the surrounding residential character. Sites would include a target of 60,000 square feet of gross leasable area and are encouraged to provide support and pedestrian activity within a residential community. The proposal reduces the density of this Subarea by nearly half with the conversion of the townhomes to single-family lots. The proposal meets the Mixed Residential Low Density land use by providing smaller lot sizes than the existing single-family lots. The proposal would also help support the land use recommendation for the Mixed Use Neighborhood Center by not impeding the future development. In 2007, the City identified a need to create a unified plan for the majority of the area located on the northeast side of US 33 and along the Hyland -Croy Corridor. The plan identifies a number of potential development sites while ensuring the Glacier Ridge Metro Park is maintained and enhanced through neighboring open space. The plan also depicts conceptual layouts of the potential forj I/' — a.,r future development along the corridor. The rezoning for Oak Park was approved in 2006 shortly before the adoption of this plan. The conceptual plan above was based on the Oak Park development showing the full build -out as outlined in the development text. The proposal is generally consistent with the vision of the special area plan. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 7 of 18 oning wi - u Community Plan The Thoroughfare Plan identifies and classifies corridors throughout the City for Thoroughfare future traffic demand and character improvements based on proposed P/an development. Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road are both identified in the thoroughfare plan for future roadway improvements. At the time of the initial rezoning for Oak Park, roadway improvements and modifications were made to ensure proper access was provided for the community to handle the new traffic demand. Based on the reduced density proposed with this application the existing roadway network will support the single-family lots without the need for any additional right-of-way dedication or infrastructure improvements. Use The proposal is for a residential development of 20 lots within an existing residetnial community. Permitted uses are limited to detached single-family homes as stated in the development text. Density The 20 lots on 2.9 acres results in a density of approximately 6.89 units per acre, compared to the previous density of 36 units or 12.41 units per acre, this results in an approxiamtely 50% decrease. The gross density of the entire Oak Park development results in a decrease from 1.76 units per acre to 1.49 units per acre, which is significantly less than the Community Plan recommendation of 3 units per acre. Development The proposed development text includes a mix of development standards from Standards the existing single-family lots while revising as necessary to work within the existing site constraints. The following is an overview of the standards that will pertain to the "Villa" homes located within Subarea D. Lot width 55 feet minimum Front yard setback 9 feet minimum, along chamfered corner no setback is required. Side yard setback 6 feet minimum, along private street or reserve no setback is reuired. Rear Yard setback Flo feet minimum Maximum Building Height 35 feet Lot Coverage 70% maximum Traffic and The proposal uses the existing public and private infrastructure to provide access Access to the single-family homes. No changes are proposed to any of the public rights- of-way or private drives with this application. The proposed conversion of six, three-story townhome buildings with 36 units to 20 detached, single-family homes will result in a negligible change in the number of trips generated from the original traffic impact study. Therefore, the change is not expected to impact the public infrastructure. A series of detention basins were constructed as part of the original Oak Park Utilities and Stormwater development to accommodate both water quantity and water quality per the Management requirements as defined in Chapter 53. The proposal is encompassed within the East Subarea as defined in the original Oak Park stormwater management report which drains to the existing east basins along Hyland -Croy Road. The applicant Process -M 1J Consistency with Dub/in Zoning Code 2) Conformance with adopted Plans 3J Advancement of general welfare and orderly development 4) Effects on adjacent uses City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 8 of 18 oning wi�umin nas aemonstratea tnat the proposes improvements will aaa less impervious area than originally programmed as part of the original Oak Park development and has demonstrated compliance with stormwater management requirements as defined in Chapter 53. Existing sanitary and water mainline have been constructed as part of the original Oak Park development. The proposed improvements include abandoning existing water and sanitary services that are no longer needed in addition to new services that were not originally constructed in order to provide water and sanitary service for all 20 proposed single-family lots. uction Reserve B and C, from a total two existing private open space reserves, acreage of 0.228 acres to 0.068 acres. The proposed reserves, Reserve N and O, will serve as an entry feature with a specific design approved with the final development plan. The Oak Park community was designed and developed under the Conservation Design Principles striving to achieve 50% open space with the majority of homes adjacent to open space. The approval included approximately 30.13 acres of open space amounting to 51% of the entire development. The proposal maintains the intent of the Conservation Design Principles through the use of existing open space and proximity to existing public and private reserves. zoning withjgliminar Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning/preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable development standards of the Zoning Code requirements except as altered in the proposed development text. The proposed use, intensity and development standards are similar to the other subareas within the Oak Park PUD. Criterion met: The proposal is consistent with the Community Plan recommendations. Criterion met: This proposal is compatible and consistent with the surrounding neighborhood and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas. Griterlon met: The development is appropriately located within the City and is compatible with existing development. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 9 of 18 oning witmimin 5) Adequacy of -1 Criterion met: The proposal removes two private open space reserves to allow open space for for the development of the entire site. Although these open spaces reserves are residential not being replaced, the community overall provides for a significant amount of development open space that will supplement the loss. 6) Protection of Criterion met: The site is vacant and contains minimal foliage that will be natural features impacted by this proposal. and resources 7)Adequate rCriterion met: The proposal utilizes existing infrastructure including utilities and infrastructurej will have minimal impact on the site. 8) Traffic and Criterion met: The proposal will result in a negligible change in the number of pedestrian trips generated from the original traffic impact study and it is not expected to Lsafety I impact the public infrastructure. The existing curb ramps will need to be replaced with curb ramps meeting standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of proposed sidewalk to be built with the site will need to be to the satisfaction of the City k 11 1 Engineer. 9) Coordination & Criterion met: The proposed development sites the buildings appropriately on integration of the site in correlation with the existing infrastructure. building & site relationships J 10)Development7M I Criterion met: This proposal meets the criterion for ensuring that the plan is layout and overall acceptable and will not hinder the orderly development of land within the intensity city. 11)Stormwater Criterion met: Adequate provision is made for stormwater management, storm managemenAl drainage within and through the site. 12) Community Criterion met: The proposal will provide for a cohesive community through the benefit continuation of residential development and complementary architecture. The design and site arrangement of the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations. 13)Design and Criterion met with Condition: The proposed architectural requirements meet appearance the requirements outlined in other subareas within the Oak Park PUD. The applicant will be required to revise the development text to require that Lots 118 Condition 1 & 119 use the same architectural model for a consistent appearance. 14)Developmen� Criterion met: The development will be completed in a single phase. phasing 15)Adequacy of Criterion met: There are adequate services proposed for the development. No public service additional public improvements will be required. 16)Infrastructure Criterion met: No contributions to infrastructure are required as part of this contribution proposal. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 10 of 18 Recommendation It Rezoning with eliminary I pment Pial Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning/preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval of this application is recommended to City Council with one condition. Conditions 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require Lots 118 and 119 to use the same architectural model mirrored across Oak Park Boulevard, prior to City Council review. Process The final development plan conforms with and provides a detailed refinement of the approved preliminary development plan. The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. Proposal The proposal is for the conversion of six, two-story townhome building pads containing a total of 36 units to 20 single-family residential lots within the existing Oak Park development. The proposal utilizes the existing infrastructure to provide frontage on public right-of-way with vehicular access from private drives. Development The proposed lots and architectural models appear to meet the standards Standards outlined in the development text. As models are not determined at this time, development standards will be verified for each home at the time of building permitting. Vehicular/ 71 The proposal uses the existing infrastructure developed with the site. The single - Pedestrian Access family homes will have frontage on Oak Meadow Drive, Snowdrop Court, or Primrose Court with vehicular access on private drives; Chinkapin Oak lane, Acorn Lane, Shumard Oak Lane, and Bur Oak Lane. Pedestrian access will be modified with this proposal to provide more direct connections to the existing residential development. ADA ramps will be relocated to match adjacent connections and a sidewalk will be constructed with the approval and construction of each individual home. No additional vehicular or pedestrian connections are required. Tree PreservationThe site is currently vacant and has no existing trees or vegetation that will be and Replacement removed with this application. I Architecture City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 11 of 18 t Plan The proposal includes the installation of street trees along the public rights-of-way i4 that are consistent with the - existing residential �" s development. The landscape plan identifies additional - - landscape elements at intersections and along the on -street parking spaces that - — complement the surrounding area. A hedge treatment in the front of each lot and - E additional private streetscape r will be required with the construction of each individual home. The hedge treatment will further integrate this proposal into the existing community while the private streetscape treatment will minimize the visual impact of the privacy fencing along the alleys. The applicant has also provided a detailed landscape plan for the reserves, shown above, to define the entry and complement the original intent of the development. hlll� , 'fa II The proposed architecture continues the English Garden theme by providing of mix of previously approved models and original designs. The development text states that specific architectural facades will be approved as part of the final development plan or by Planning Staff at a later date using the guidelines set forth in the text. The applicant is proposing a total of six architectural models; the "Carlowe"'the "Ardmoor", the "Ashleigh", the "Augusta", the "Ashbourne", and the "Castletroy". Two of the models, the "Ashbourne" and "Castletroy" were included with the original approval while the remaining four are original designs for this subarea. All of the models propose a mix of materials such as stucco, brick, shake siding, and cementitious siding with dimensional asphalt shingles for the roof. The architecture maintains many similar design features as the existing community such as attached garages, incorporated porches, tower elements, and cupolas. The applicant has provided a diversity matrix to ensure that the proposal Details Stormwater Management City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 12 of 18 Plan can integrate with the existing residential homes without reflecting facades with the exception of Lots 118 and 119. These lots will use the same architectural model to aid in defining the main entrance and provide a uniform appearance on A series of detention basins were constructed as part of the original Oak Park development to accommodate both water quantity and water quality per the requirements as defined in Chapter 53. The proposal is encompassed within the East Subarea as defined in the original Oak Park stormwater management report which drains to the existing east basins along Hyland -Croy Road. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed improvements will add less impervious area than originally programmed as part of the original Oak Park development and has demonstrated compliance with stormwater management requirements as defined Utilities, Lighting NJ Existing sanitary and water mainline has been constructed as part of the original and Grading Oak Park development. The proposed improvements include abandoning existing water and sanitary services that are no longer needed in addition to new services that were not originally constructed in order to provide water and sanitary service for all 20 proposed single-family lots. The existing non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell - Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection will need to be made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits. The proposal includes minor regrading of the originally programmed six townhome building lots to accommodate the 20 proposed single-family lots and will not change the drainage pattern for stormwater conveyance. sl Development Plan I�Iv rocess Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for an amended final development plan. Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. J 1) Consistency wrt Criterion met with Condition: The proposal is consistent with the the approved requirements of the preliminary development plan, development text, and zoning preliminary code. Lots 109 & 128 will be required to orient their outdoor amenity areas development towards the western property line, subject to verification at building permitting. plan Condition 1 City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 13 of 18 Mal Development 2) Traffic and Criterion met with Condition: The proposal will result in a negligible change pedestrian in the number of trips generated from the original traffic impact study and it is safety I not expected to impact the public infrastructure. The existing non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell - Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection will need to be made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits. Condition 2 3) Adequate Criterion met: As an existing site proposed for redevelopment, the site has public services adequate public services. No open space dedication is required with this and open space application. 4) Protection of Not applicable. natural features and resources 1 1 5)Adequacy of Criterion met: Proposed site lighting is appropriate and meets all Code lighting requirements. 5) Signs Not applicable. consistent with preliminary development plan 7)Appropriate Criterion met with Conditions: The plan appropriate landscaping to integrate landscaping to the proposed development into the existing community. Additional landscaping enhance, will be provided and reviewed at the time of building permitting based on the buffer, & soften requirements of the development text and zoning code. The applicant will need the building to choose a bench that coordinates with the existing benches installed in the and site reserves and revise the landscape plan better defining the landscape materials and diversifying the species. Conditions 3 & 4 8) Compliant Criterion met: The proposal has demonstrated compliance with stormwater Stormwater management requirements as defined in Chapter 53. management 9) A//phasesNotApplicab/e. comply with the previous criteria l0�iance Criterion met: The proposal appears to comply with all other known applicable with other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. laws regulations � SII City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 14 of 18 Recommendatl al Development Plan Approval In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteria and the existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this request with four conditions. Conditions 1) That Lots 109 & 128 orient their outdoor amenity areas towards the western property line, subject to verification at building permitting; 2) That the existing non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits; 3) That the applicant choose a bench that coordinates with the existing benches near the community center, prior to building permitting; and, 4) That the applicant revise the landscape plan (sheet 6/11) defining the location of proposed plantings, bed edges, and diversifying the landscape ,[A, materials, subject to staff approval, prior to City Council review. Fen Space Reserves re iminary & Final P 90 The purpose of the preliminary and final plat is to assure conformance with the requirements set forth in Sections 152.085 through 152.095 of the Subdivision Regulations, exclusive of other standards in the Code. The proposed plat is for the resubdivision of 2.9 acres of land from 36 townhome properties (Lots 73 thru 108) and two reserves (Reserves B & C) to 20 single- family lots and two reserves. The plat does not include any right-of-way dedication. The lots will have access on existing public right-of-way and on private drives located in Reserves "J" and "I". The single-family lots range in size from 0.129 acres to 0.156 acres and identify all existing utility and sidewalk easements established with the ori The proposed plat includes the resubdivision of two existing reserves (Reserves B & C) to two smaller reserves (Reserves N & O). Reserves B & C are located at the intersection of Oak Park Boulevard and Oak Meadow Drive and are identical in size at 0.114 acres. The proposed reserves are smaller due to the creation of the single-family lots at a size of 0.034 acres each amounting to a total decrease of 0.16 acres of private open space. The applicant will need to revise the plat to include maintenance responsibilities of the reserves prior to review by City Council. Analysis eliminary & Final Plam —7 Process Following a recommendation by the Commission, the preliminary and final plat will be forwarded to City Council for final action. The plat can be recorded after City Council approval. 1)Plat lnformation Criterion met with Condition: This proposal is consistent with the and Construction requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Code. The applicant will Requirements be required to revise the preliminary plat as well as make any other minor technical ad ustments prior to Council review. Condition 1 2) Street, Sidewa/k and B/kepath Standards 7 4) Open Space Requirements Condition 2 City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 15 of 18 ry & Fina Criterion met: All necessary standards have been provided as part of the proposed plat. Criterion met: The plat establishes or identifies necessary easements for the construction and maintenance of all utilities in accordance with applicable standards. Criterion met with Condition: Two private open space reserves are being platted as part of this application. The applicant will need to revise the plat to identify maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves prior to review by City Council. Recommendatiliminal PI Summary This proposal complies with the preliminary and final plat review criteria and the Subdivision Regulations therefore approval of this request is recommended with two conditions. Conditions 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal; and, 2) That the applicant add a note to the Final Plat outlining ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the two reserves, prior to City Council submittal. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 16 of 18 REZONING/ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENY�RITERIA The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves/denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves/denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading/introduction and a second reading/public hearing for a final vote. A two-thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non -conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 17 of 18 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(6) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in §153.053(E)(4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site feeding into regional stormwater basin which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP I Oak Park, Subarea D Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 18 of 18 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10)The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. PRELIMINARY/ FINAL PLAT CRITERIA The Zoning Code does not contain specific criteria to guide the review of plats. Planning bases the evaluation on the conformance of the plat with the requirements set forth in Chapter 152: Subdivision Regulations of the Code, which are summarized below: The proposed final plat document includes all the required technical information. Construction will be bonded and completed in an appropriate time frame, inspections will be conducted by the City in accordance with Engineering standards for improvements, and maintenance will be completed as necessary. The proposed lots, street widths, grades, curvatures, intersections, and signs comply with the standards set forth in these Code sections. The proposal includes provisions for water, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, electric, telephone, and cable supplies in accordance with approved standards. The proposed development complies with the open space and recreation facility requirements or payment into the Parkland Acquisition Fund is made in lieu of dedication. In addition, the Planning and Zoning Commission is to determine that the final layout and details of the final plat comply with the approved preliminary plat. The Commission is to consider several factors in making its recommendation: 1) The final plat conforms with the approved preliminary plat; 2) The plat conforms to the adopted Thoroughfare Plan and meets all applicable parkland dedication and open space requirements; and 3) The final plat conforms to the subdivision and zoning regulations, municipal stormwater regulations, and other applicable requirements. RECORD OF ACTION 4c of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, June 8, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Oak Park, Subarea D Oak Meadow Drive 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat/Final Plat Proposal: Rezoning 2.94 -acres from PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for Townhomes) to PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for single-family lots) to convert four, three- story townhome buildings with 36 units to 20 detached, single-family homes and all associated site improvements. The site is located on the west side of Hyland Croy Road, approximately 700 feet southwest of the intersection with Brand Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a preliminary and final plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. This is also a request for review and approval of a final development plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Christopher T. Cline, Blaugrund, Kessler, Myers & Postalakis. Planning Contact: Logan Stang, Planner I. Contact Information: (614) 410-4652, Istang@dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Stidhem seconded, to table this application at the request of the applicant. VOTE: 5-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan/Final Development Plan/Preliminary Plat/Final Plat was tabled. .1;16101.1014 BILT161II4-1 Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Absent Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION Logan Stang Planner I PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov 2. Oak Park, Subarea D 17-028Z/PDP/PP/FDP/FP Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 19 Oak Meadow Drive Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Preliminary Plat/Final Plat The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is for Rezoning 2.94 -acres from PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for Townhomes) to PUD (Oak Park, Subarea D for single-family lots) to convert six, three- story townhome buildings with 36 units to 20 detached, single-family homes and all associated site improvements. She said the site is on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 700 feet southwest of the intersection with Brand Road. She said this is a request for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for Preliminary and Final Plats under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. She said this is also a request for a review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. The Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission in regard to Logan Stang presented the PUD Process Overview and explained the process consists of three potential steps. He indicated this application is unique as it encompasses the two formal steps of establishing a PUD, which are the Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan that establishes the development standards and the Final Development Plan with the Final Plat that verifies conformance with the development standards. He said once this application receives final approval, the applicant will be able to record the plat and begin filing for building permits as this covers all of the public review. Mr. Stang presented an aerial view of the site townhome section of the Oak Park PUD or Sul rezone the site to allow for 20 single-family resi( permitted. I the application for Rezoning pertains to the the development. He said the proposal is to where 36 townhome units in six buildings was Mr. Stang presented the Community Plan — Future Land; Use Plan. He explained that the Community Plan has two future land use recommendations that this site overlaps. The first is for Mixed Residential — Low Density, he said, which is intendedto, provide a mix of housing options at a typical density of 3 units per acre. He noted the second is for the Mixed -Use Neighborhood Center providing retail uses and personal services in a commercial center integrated into a residential neighborhood. He stated the proposal meets the Mixed Residential Land Use by, providing" smaller single-family lots than what the existing residential development has and will help support the commercial that is intended to be developed within Subarea E, the two larger vacant properties of the Oak Park development. Mr. Stang pointed out that the site is located within a special area plan for the Northwest/Glacier Ridge area. He said as the Oak Park development was approved, just prior to the Community Plan update in 2007, many of the recommendations of the Community Plan had been met with this development such as the larger setbacks along Hyland -Croy Road and the connections to Glacier Ridge Metro Park. He presented the conceptual layout that is identical to what Oak Park is today, including the townhomes and commercial elements. Additionally, he said any right-of-way dedication and infrastructure improvements were made with the original development and due to the decrease in overall density, no additional improvements will be required as the existing street network is capable of handling the demand. Mr. Stang presented a graphic of the Development Standards. He said these were proposed for Subarea D that are substantially similar to the standards used for the existing residential homes. Due to the smaller lot depth, he explained the front and rear yard setbacks have been modified to allow for similar style homes. He said the clustering of homes created more dense pockets throughout the development to allow for a greater amount of open space with these standards continuing the character that has been Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 19 produced. Additional standards include the continued hedge treatment along the public roads, architectural requirements, and fence regulations he said. Mr. Stang reported that Staff is requesting that the front yard setback be increased from six feet to nine feet to allow for additional open space in the front. He said that a landscape treatment should also be provided for any fence located along the rear of the properties to soften the view from Hyland -Croy Road and Oak Park Boulevard until the commercial properties develop. Mr. Stang said the original development applied the Conservation Design Principles, which sought to achieve 50% open space based on the entire acreage being rezoned. He reported that Oak Park was approved with approximately 51% of open space with the majority being dedicated for public use. Mr. Stang said the proposed rezoning includes the removal of two private reserves located in front of the club house, which amounts to a loss of roughly a quarter of an acre. Although this open space is not being replaced, he explained the connectivity to existing open spaces and achievement of 50% gross open space is more than adequate for the community at large. Mr. Stang presented a graphic of the Final Development Plan and restated it is for the re -subdivision of 36 townhome properties and two reserves to 20 single-family lots. He noted the lots will use the existing infrastructure to have frontage on one of three public streets with rear access along the private drives. He said the sites have access to existing utilities and were cleared of any vegetation during the original site work. He pointed out that the commercial„ properties are not included with this application and will still permit commercial uses under the original', zoning approval. Mr. Stang said the applicant has provided e presented. He indicated that most planned however, the proposed development Development Plan. In the future,'h elevations using the standards outlin He pointed out the two models on existing residential areas while the re architectural theme of the communitj architectural elements such as tower! to ensure that no adjacent homes th or elevation. <amples of six architectural models for Subarea D, which he districts do not provide architectural examples for review; luires that the Commission approve elevations with the Final ined that Planning Staff can approve additional models or e development text to allow for more architectural diversity. ht, the Ashbourne and Castletroy, were approved for the four are new models. He said all of the models continue the 3 various materials such as brick, stucco, and shake siding and cupolas. A diversity matrix has also been provided he reported next to, or across from one another, will use the same model Mr. Stang presented the Landscape Details that the applicant has included in a landscape plan containing a continued streetscape with additional lot requirements being determined and reviewed with the building permit. He said the text also allows for a six-foot privacy fence installed along the rear of the homes with one of three designs that were approved for the existing single-family sections; a side yard abutting a public street is allowed a four foot fence of a consistent design. Staff is conditioning that a provision be added to the development text, he said, requiring a fence treatment along the private drives to help soften the appearance, which would be reviewed with the fence installation, depending on whether a property owner chooses to install the fence. Mr. Stang said the final component of this application is a Preliminary and Final Plat required for the re- subdivision to the single-family lots. He presented a graphic and noted the plat identifies or establishes necessary easements for the development of the lots and does not include any right-of-way or open space dedication. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 19 Mr. Stang restated there are three motions required by the Commission this evening: 1. Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan 2. Final Development Plan 3. Preliminary and Final Plats Mr. Stang said approval is recommended to City Council for the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan with two conditions: 1) That the applicant revise the development text to require a minimum front yard setback of nine feet from the public right-of-way, prior to City Council review; and 2) That the applicant revise the development text to require continuous landscaping along all fences constructed next to an alley or private drive, prior to City Council review and subject to staff approval. Mr. Stang said approval is recommended for the Final 1) That the existing curb ramps be replaced with curb ramps meeting standards to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 2) That the proposed sidewalk connections at the intersections be built with the site; 3) That the non -operational street light at the southwest corner of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road/Oak Meadow Drive intersection is made operational at no cost to the City prior to the submittal of building permits; 4) That the proposed landscaping be removed from within the intersection sight distance triangles in accordance with Policy 08-013 at the time of building permitting, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and 5) That the applicant revise the landscape plan to provide a`diverse selection of street trees at the time of building permitting,subject to staff approval. Mr. Stang said approval is recommended to City Council for the Preliminary and Final Plats with two conditions: 1) That the Preliminary Plat be revised to contain the information required by Section 152.018 of the Subdivision Regulations,, prior to City Council submittal; and 2) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. Steve Stidhem asked for clarification on fencing along the rear of the properties. Mr. Stang explained it is a privacy fence to help screen from the commercial area if the homeowner would like to install the six- foot tall fence. He said it is not required and they can run it from their house to their side property line. Cathy De Rosa said when this was reviewed before, the Commission was given three options (A, B, or C). She asked if this is option 'B' to which Mr. Stang answered affirmatively and clarified it is the one option that did not include the commercial properties at all. Ms. De Rosa inquired about the lot coverage comparisons. Mr. Stang said the existing homes were designed in a cluster to allow for more open space so they have a maximum lot coverage of 60%. He said the reason this is increased to 70% is because there is a loss of about 20 feet from the depth of each of the properties due the existing conditions. He indicated that other areas in the City have been approved for up to 70% for lot coverage for smaller lots. Chris Brown asked if there would still be parking on the street in front of the homes. Mr. Stang confirmed that was correct. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 19 Mr. Miller inquired about the setback from 6 feet to 9 feet. He asked how a nine -foot setback compares to other patio homes in the City. Mr. Stang indicated it is larger because typically, there is a very small front setback so six feet is average for some of those that come to mind. He said there are some developments that have larger or deeper lots so they can implore a larger front yard setback. He referred to a section of Tartan West as being an area comparable to this proposal in terms of lot size. Mr. Miller asked what the rationale was for going from six to nine feet. Mr. Stang answered it was the result of working with the applicant and meeting their configurations. Victoria Newell asked about the clipped corners for Lots 119 and 118 as there is no setback at Oak Park Boulevard. She noted there are several lots that are that way and asked if staff was supportive of that. Mr. Stang said staff was supportive given the nature of the lots themselves. Ms. Newell asked if the heights of four and six feet for fencing was part of the original text. Mr. Stang answered the original submission did not state that was permitted. He reported that staff had encouraged the applicant to have fences at four feet in height to be consistent with ;the rest of the City. Ms. Newell noted that when the Zoning Code limits heights to four feet, how staff can support six-foot fences. Mr. Stang indicated it was due to the commercial components and they are viewing it as if the commercial area gets developed. Claudia Husak said the Commission has Ballantrae and Greystone Mews). Chris Cline, Blaugrund, Kessler, Myers & Posts applicant, Oak Park Dublin LLC. He pointed out a I indicated that he learned the day before that developed. He stated the applicant has agreed reported the applicant has met with the residents that for other smaller lot developments (Villas of Jorthington, OH, said he is representing the team was present to answer any questions. He :ent is for the commercial component to be of the conditions presented this evening. He ice the informal review with the PZC. Mr. Cline said they have not asked ;the Commission to cut them a break on materials or architecture with this plan so they are going forward with the same quality development as is already in place. He indicated these homes will need to appeal to a demanding and educated clientele. He anticipates the prices will be $375,000 $450,000. He said the lot depth of 104 feet makes it difficult to deliver a successful single-family residential design with an attached garage in the rear (there is a connector between the house and the garage). He suggested that the variety of floor plans that could appeal to multiple demographics be used. He said the architectural models they have proposed tonight are ready for approval versus the placeholder conceptual homes they presented before. He said they do not have a lot of experience with rear access products in Central Ohio and selling the alleys for high quality homes could be a challenge including the lack of safety factors in the back. Mr. Cline presented a graphic showing the conceptual plan superimposed onto the existing conditions plan and pointed out that all the other homes in Oak Park have a secure back yard and none of these homes will have that protection. He said the privacy fences along the commercial lot are essential as anything could go into the commercial property. Mr. Cline said even though the fences are not required and could be a choice for the occupant, the applicant is making it mandatory that all the fences are installed as each house is built for consistency. He said the only caveat he would have to commit to that is a condition or safety net whereas if the commercial boundary were to develop residentially before they completed development of this site, they might want to revisit that as to whether or not they still need the six-foot privacy fence if there was a similar land use on the other side of this property. He said any condition the Commission would like to Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 19 impose on that point, he would appreciate being left a back door where staff could approve the removal of that fence, if the applicant determines it is not necessary. He said they are going from 36 units down to 20 so they are challenged economically but believe they brought a good plan to the City. He indicated they are trying to fix a problem that others created. Linda Menerey, EMH&T, presented a diagram that was in the packet. She said she wanted to touch on just a few points and restated that on -street parking currently exists. She said it is possible to adjust some of the lots to accommodate nine -foot setbacks. She pointed out where the chamfer is and the sidewalk is actually inside of the lot on an easement when it is adjacent to this public street so they have smaller tree lawns and shrubs. She restated they went to the 70% lot coverage because these are smaller lots and they do not know yet the designs of the patios or how much room they will take up from the yard so they allowed themselves flexibility. From a stormwater perspective, she said they ran the calculations as if they were doing the full 70% lot coverage. She provided agraphic with the private alley on the rear and pointed out the area where the six-foot fences would be installed. She said the homeowner would have the option to put a four -foot fence up for all four sides but then a two -foot lattice would be added as a nice detail and to have heights consistent. Mr. Miller inquired about lawn maintenance. Mr. Clinesaid the deed restrictionsstate that the maintenance will be provided by the HOA but if the HOA decided to d4 that the homeowners would have to pay more money; he indicated that is a detail they need to sort out. Brett Cantrell, project manager for Oak Park, said each individual homeowner takes care of their own lot; the builder takes care of some of the common areas and some of it is, split with the HOA. Mr. Cline said that as they move forward they will need to fix that discrepancy by working with the residents. Mr. Stidhem asked about the inconsistency on the fence. Mr. Cline ''said the builder is going to require that the six-foot fence be a mandatory option. Ms. De Rosa asked what the distance is from the garage door down the driveway or the back to the alley. Mr. Stang answered the distance would partially depend on the model chosen. He said there is a 10 -foot easement between theproperty line and the garage but the models stagger a little bit. Mr. Stang confirmed there would be landscaping ,behind the fence portion within the 10 -foot easement. Ms. De Rosa inquired about landscaping buffers for the commercial side of that property. Mr. Stang answered there would be additional screening requirements for vehicular use areas for the parking lots themselves. He anticipates the resident seeing a landscape island that would run along the other edge of the private drives but there will be access points to the private drives but there will be additional landscaping required like;a single row to help shield the parking lot from the rear of these homes. Ms. De Rosa asked what the height would be. Ms. Menerey said there would be a three-foot continuous hedge fence with trees one per 40 feet. She added there would be a layering effect to the plant material. Mr. Brown asked where the trash receptacles will be placed. Mr. Stang answered in the garage. Ms. Newell said if the trash needs to be in the garage, it needs to be written in the text. Ms. Husak noted that trash receptacles to be stored in a garage is a Code requirement. Mr. Stang added it would be applicable to any zoning district in the City. Ms. Newell suggested she would like to see the two fence heights treated aesthetically better. The Chair invited public comment. Melvis Houseman, 7134 Snow Drop Court, said she is one of the residents in the community. Prasad Vempati, 7031 Greenland Place, said he is also a resident of the community. Ms. Houseman said they Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 19 were here speaking on behalf of many of the homeowners in the community. She said they prepared a PowerPoint presentation to express their concerns. She said the three primary concerns are how crowded the areas are (big homes on smaller lots along with the shorter setbacks), designated open space that has been removed, and the fence because it will be in view as one enters the community and since the commercial property development timeline has not been established, they would like the fence not to be installed until the commercial property is developed. Mr. Vempati said because the look and feel of the community is starting to change. Ms. Houseman said because the sides of these homes will be placed so close to the sidewalk, there will not be any privacy for those homeowners and with the smaller setbacks there, there will also be less green space. She suggested one of the homes be eliminated. Mr. Vempati said there is no space for a tree on some of these lots in the back of the house. Ms. Houseman said fences require maintenance and do not look good over time and that is why a lot of communities do not permit fences. Mr. Vempati said additionally there is hardly any space for a lawn mower to maneuver between the homes due to the small side setback. The Chair invited additional public comment. [Hearing none.] She closed the public portion of the meeting. Cathy De Rosa said she wanted to address the architecture. The Chair requested the review criteria be posted again for which Mr. Stang complied and pointed out that the Final Development Plan is in conformance with the Preliminary Development Plan as well as the final details for the site itself (architecture, layout, etc.). Chris Brown asked if there was green space in the original development where currently Lots 118 and 119 are being shown. Mr. Stang answered yes, which was located in reserve B & C for the townhomes. Mr. Brown said this case is so difficult because looking at the original developers intent, two separate ownership groups (one not obligated by the other), and current residents that have invested in the community. He indicated the intent of the developer is to try and make it right somehow in a way that is economically feasible. He said he also has to consider the people that will live there in perpetuity. He said he does not have a problem with the density. He indicated he has to consider the long term picture and is assuming the commercial area will be developed nicely. He said he has a problem with the reserves being taken up with these two lots. He questioned whether it is logistically possible to hold off building the fences until the commercial component is developed. Steve Stidhem said he is fine with the proposed density. He suggested that fencing consistency should be written into the deed restrictions. He said he agreed with Mr. Brown about the two lots taking up green space. He said he likes the architecture and the houses closer to the street, and the garages in the rear are going to be interesting. Ms. De Rosa said the Commission loved the way the townhouses were going to look in the original plan and had expressed that one of the most important things was that the feel and character continue. Referring to the four elevations out of six, she said they are flat and feel tighter in that very condensed space. Mr. Cline said he is not the architect but when the new designs were put together, they pulled the garages off the front placing them in the back and they took elements from approved models. He mentioned that staff has not been critical of the architecture so they took that to mean they hit the target in terms of having the right kind of look. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 19 Ms. De Rosa said she is not critical of the elements, she asked that the look and feel of the current community be considered for consistency. Mr. Cline stated he did not think the houses in this development will be distinguishable from anything in Oak Park. Ms. Menerey added there are three models with porches, which provides relief along the frontage. She restated that there will be the requirement of architectural diversity. In terms of the front setbacks, she said they are set; the existing parking is in, the sidewalk has to be where it is, the right-of-way is there and established, and the three foot difference was determined to be the maximum give. She said, side- to-side, these units are probably less crowded due to the footprint they have. Ms. De Rosa agreed with her fellow Commissioners about having the green space at the entrance because that will create a feel of openness, even if it is relatively small. Ms. De Rosa said the struggle with the fences in the back is going to be inconsistency. Bob Miller said he hated this case last time and still hates it. He said he is very empathetic with the residents. He said this is a tough situation given the owner of the commercial property is not being as cooperative as we would like. He said he believes the applicant has done an outstanding job with this difficult situation. After reviewing all the criteria the Commission uses to apply to a case, he said that applicant has checked just about all of the boxes: the density has been brought down; the green space has been met as Mr. Stang has pointed out several times; and the setback has been increased in deference to improving the look of the community. He said the only thing he struggles with is the view from Hyland -Croy Road until there is commercial development. He suggested the fences be installed later, which could appease the residents but he does not know how to accomplish that. For the most part, he said the applicant has his full support. He concluded he would eliminate the four -foot fence on Oak Park Boulevard to which Mr. Brown and Mr. Stidhem previously agreed. He suggested that if the fence was made of stone, it might look better. Ms. Newell said the density is about half of what could be permitted on the property and that alone makes this a very viable application. She said she struggled with the criteria for adequate open space. She said she found that everything appeared to be an improvement with this application as to what could be on this property until she got to the elimination of that green space. In terms of the fencing, there are other options that could be explored because we cannot control when the commercial gets developed and we cannot even be certain it will ultimately be commercial development but we have to look at the way it is zoned today. Mr. Brown said he is questioning how to solve this problem temporarily and make those two commercial lots look bigger and the solution is street trees on Oak Tree Drive North and Oak Park Boulevard along those undeveloped lots. He said it would make the whole entrance more pleasing and tempers the backyards of all of these villas. He stated the depth to the street does not bother him and he referred to neighborhoods in New Albany, Ohio. He indicated those neighborhoods are stunning and beautiful and provide a sense of community. For clarification, Mr. Stang asked if Mr. Brown is proposing that 2 -inch caliper street trees be planted on the opposite side of the alley on the commercial lots. Mr. Brown answered on the commercial property on Oak Tree Drive North and Oak Park Boulevard to soften the whole area which gives an actual boulevard; it would help screen the back of all these developments as those grow just because it changes the focus. He added the trees can be removed once the commercial property starts its development. He concluded it would help the entry to the whole community. Mr. Cline said the main entrance is a public street so there may be right-of-way we can work with there; the street to the east is owned in fee by the commercial property owner. Mr. Brown said he understood Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 8, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 19 that but thought maybe there was a way to work with them. Mr. Cline said doing something with the City is feasible; he does not think it is feasible to work with the commercial developer. Mr. Stang said Oak Tree Drive is not part of this application and we cannot require that the property owner do anything with that property as it is all private and they have full ownership and we cannot hold this applicant to do something on property they do not own. Mr. Brown said he is tired of that commercial land being in purgatory and he is looking for a solution. Potential solutions were discussed. Claudia Husak said with all the outstanding issues, this application is not ready to move forward. Mr. Cline requested that the application be tabled. Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Ms. Newell seconded, to table this application at the request of the applicant. The vote was as follows: Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; and Ms. Newell, yes. (Tabled 5 — 0) 3. PUD — Llewellyn Farms — Parking 4930 Bradenton Avenue 17-043AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is a request for an Amended Final Development Plan to reduce the total number of parking spaces required for a medical office. She said the site is northwest of the intersection of Frantz Road and Bradenton Avenue. She said this is a request for a review and approval of a Minor Text Modification and an Amended Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. The Chair swore anyone intending to address the Commission with regard to this case. Nichole Martin presented an aerial view of the site. She indicated this PUD is one of the older developments in the City and does not have a development text to accompany it; therefore, the standards for the site refer to the most similar zoning district and in this case it is Suburban Office and Institutional District. She said the site was developed under those standards being parked for an office standard. She said the 20,000 -foot building that exists on the site requires 80 spaces. She said the applicant is requesting parking for a medical office that would require 90 spaces on this lot. Additionally, she said the proposal is to maintain 79 spaces and staff has determined there is adequate space to provide the 80"' parking space. Ms. Martin said approval is recommended for a Minor Text Modification that allows the building to reside on the site in the current condition parked at an office rate of one space per 250 square feet of floor area equating to 80 spaces. She said the following is a condition of approval: 1) That the applicant provides one additional parking space to comply with the general office parking requirement. Bob Miller said at 20,000 square feet, 10,000 is proposed to go from general office to medical. He asked if staff took into consideration the possibility of the other 10,000 square feet being impacted by all the medical parking. Ms. Martin answered staff was comfortable with that change as this has been seen elsewhere in the City and the medical parking does not utilize the full extent of the parking that is required. RECORD OF DISCUSSION City of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, November 10, 2016 1 6:0 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Oak Park PUD, Subarea D — Oak Park Townhomes Oak Meadow Drive 16-090INF Informal Review Proposal: Single-family townhomes on four acres previously approved for townhouse condominiums on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road at the intersection with Oak Park Boulevard. Request: Informal review and non-binding feedback of a proposal prior to a formal application for rezoning. Applicant: Christopher Cline, Blaugrund Kessler Myers + Postalakis. Planning Contact: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Planning Manager. Contact Information: (614) 410-4690, jrauch@dublin.oh.us RESULT: The Commission informally reviewed the proposed request to convert 36 approved townhouse units to single-family dwelling units within the Oak Park Development and was supportive of the proposed change. The Commission expressed a desire to ensure the architectural design and integrity of the community is maintained with a future proposal. The Commission encouraged the opportunity to include the conversion of the commercial area to single-family residential. Their general support of the proposed concepts aligned with Option A, understanding the biggest challenge is that property is under separate ownership. MEMBERS PRESENT: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION ham\ l n Jenniier M. Rauch, AICP, Planning Manager PLANNENG 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov EVERYTHING GROWS HERE. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission November 10, 2016 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 10 said they are not trying to do anything cheap but they are trying to compete and there is a lot of expense to this. He restated something has to happen quickly. Mr. Brown concluded that the Commission is concerned for the existing residents. He encouraged the applicant to propose a layout and product that is equal to that, and talk to the other developer into permitting the applicant to develop some of that land, then the Commission would probably support Options A or C and if not then Option B is probably viable. Ms. Newell indicated the Commission would not support any other architecture than what was approved. Mr. Miller asked if it is possible for staff to provide this group with a path forward and how to approach Council regarding the commercial piece. He said he would like to provide a course of action to pursue. Ms. Rauch said the informal this evening was the first step. She said there is an option for the applicant to go before Council requesting an Informal Review. 2. a ... ... ..-.t�Rt�RT�TIlTT7T.T.R.'iT.77T71^.T..T-1T.-Tn7ltC1�Si7Rf7LT.:TIER.TJTE177.7Wit ■-