Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Ordinance 043-17
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc. Ordinance No. 43 -17 RECORD OF ORDINANCES Form No. 30043 Passed , 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 2.33 ACRES FROM PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (KENDALL RIDGE OFFICES AND CONDOS) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (KENDALL RIDGE DAYCARE) FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL LAND AND INCREASE THE PERINITTED DAYCARE DENSITY FROM 7,500 SQUARE FEET TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET (CASE 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP), AND AUTFIORIZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN REMNANT ACREAGE TO 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED WHEREAS, the City of Dublin and The Stonehenge Company entered into an agreement via Ordinance 67 -06 to allow for the realignment of the Avery Road and Tuswell Drive intersection, and the transfer of approximately ±0.425- acre from the City of Dublin to 6055 Avery Road Limited (The Stonehenge Company); and WHEREAS, City Council authorized the vacation of this property via Ordinance 37 -17 at the June 26, 2017 Council meeting; and WHEREAS, in addition to this acreage, there are several remnant portions of two parcels that the City desires to transfer as part of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, specifically, the City desires to convey 0.044 -acre from Parcel Number 274- 000115 and 0.231 -acre from Parcel Number 274 -00083 to 6055 Avery Road Limited for the purpose of consolidating residual land and creating a cohesive commercial development site; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the Dublin Community Plan and the Zoning Code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto as well as the approved development text. Section 2. The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance there within. Section 3. The City hereby conveys 0.044 -acre from Parcel Number 274 - 000115 and 0.231 - acre from Parcel Number 274 -00083 to 6055 Avery Road Limited (The Stonehenge Company) for the purpose of consolidating residual land and creating a cohesive commercial development site. Section 4. This Ordinances II take effect upon the earliest date permitted by Law. Pa'sed this �''rl /-� ay f , 2017. A i J, 117 - - ayor - PresJd14g Officer ATTEST: Clerk of Council Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway * Dublin, OH 43017-1090 lety of Dublin Phone: 614.410.4400 * Fax-, 614.410.4490 UW'Aft 0& "Oak, Cit M M �L Tom, Members of Dublin City Council From,x, Dana L. McDaniel, City Mana Date: July 27, 2017 Initiated By: Vincent A. Papsidero, FAICP, Planning Director Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner/Current Planning Manager Nichole M. Martin, Planner I Summary Ordinance 43-17 is a request for an amendment to the approved development text of a Planned District to incorporate additional land due to the realignment of the Avery Road and Tuswell Drive intersection, and to increase the permitted daycare density from 7,500 square feet to 10,000 square feet. Proposal The applicant is proposing a 10,000-square-foot daycare facility with associated site improvements including a 40-space parking lot, play areas, and landscaping. Access is proposed off Tuswell Drive consistent with exhibits included in Ordinance 67-06. Stormwater management is provided by an Ord, 43-17 — Kendall Ridge Office/Daycare rezoning July 27, 2017 Page 2 of 3 existing retention basin on the western portion of the site, and a decorative stacked stone wall is proposed along Avery Road. The proposed facility is a traditional, single-story building. The building will be clad primarily with a limestone veneer and stucco finish. Additional details are proposed to enhance the character including a cast stone watertable, brick soldier course above windows and doors, dormers, and dimensional asphalt shingles. MWM I During the Planning and Zoning Commission review of this application, adjacent residents expressed concerns regarding this proposal. The Commission requested the applicant work to inform adjacent homeowners. The applicant has verified with Planning that contact has been established with the Villas at Glenealy, and voicemall and written communication was sent to th neighborhood of Kendall Ridge. Planning has not been contacted by these residents. I =41 1) The development text be updated to require a wrought-iron style decorative fence. iqn�ip�ii Ord. 43-17 — Kendall Ridge Office/Daycare rezoning July 27, 2017 Page 3 of 3 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting; and, 6) That the applicant work with the City Engineer to modify the angle of the access drive off of Tuswell Drive. Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 43-17 at the second reading/public hearing on August 14, 2017. �I C , 1 go rte, t- 0 • IM . • , . ./rte, •° i e i i ,r - - Apt I .SIR ir IL.- 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Final Development Plan 0 150 1 300 Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD - Kiddie Academy City of Dublin 6055 Avery Road Feet 0 Q! ■ w a IREL—AN ■P ■L E M W pY SWELL D� / /�� FO R , Z Q' V n RIDGE L'OOQ - EAGHAN1DR nn AN- S_HERR, IiAV�E C _ •WAY ro PM D����� �� ■r�� yRINGSL KE 17- 031PDP /Z /FDP Preliminary Development Plan/ Rezoning/ 0 150 300 Final Development Plan Kiddie Academy Feet 6055 Avery Road CITY OF DUBLIN- Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone/ TDD: 614 -410 -4600 Fax: 614 -410 -4747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ❑ Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) 0 Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) 0 Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) ❑ Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.115) ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment ❑ Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. PropertyAddress(es): Tuswell Drive and Avery Road, Dublin, 01-143016 Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): 274000289, 274000083, 274000115 Existing Land Use /Development: Undeveloped Land Parcel Size(s) (Acres): 2.33 Acres IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use /Development: Children's Daycare facility, with associated drive, parking, walk, and three associated play areas - Proposed Rezoning to adjust site area for incorporation of right -of -way and increase from allowable facility size from 7,500 S.F. to allow for 10,000 S.F. daycare Total acres affected by application: 0.97 Acres III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Please attach additional sheets if needed. Name (Individual or Organization): The Stonehenge Company 6253 Riverside Drive, Ste. 200, Dublin, OH 43017 Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614- 509 -9000 Fax: Email or Alternate Contact Information: adam.trautner @stonehenge - company.com IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Andrew Gardner, P.E. Applicant is also property owner: yes ❑ no El Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Bird + Bull, Inc. (Engineer) Mailing Address: 3500 Snouffer Road, Ste. 225, Columbus, OH 43235 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614- 761 -1661 Fax: 614 - 761 -1328 Email or Alternate Contact Information: AGardner @birdbull.com V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: This Is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Andrew Gardner, P.E. Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Bird + Bull, Inc. (Engineer) Mailing Address: 3500 Snouffer Road, Ste. 225, Columbus, OH 43235 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614- 761 -1661 Fax: 614- 761 -1328 Email or Alternate Contact Information: AGardner @birdbull.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. 1 Adam Trautner (The Stonehenge Company) the owner, hereby authorize Andrew Gardner, P.E., (Bird + Bull, Inc.) to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, Including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: - Date: V Z?' J (-7 Check this box if the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representative(s) is attached as a separate do AAY P6 Subscribed and sworn before me this ay f ! 2fl O',l/ State of uo County of L' ��'"'r"`t�l lJ Notary Public lea u0! lei r VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: si visit he pr epreseivgs are s application. The Owner /Applicant, as noted below, hereby aut City representatives to visit, photograph an tra he property described in this application. I Adam Trautner (The Stonehenge Company) , the owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. Signature of applicant or authorized representativ — Date: Page 2 of 3 VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and /or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. I Andrew Gardner, P.E., (Bird + Bull, Inc.), the owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative:" I Date: '3/127 // 7 I IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized. 1 Andrew Gardner, P.E., (Bird + Bull, Inc.) , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: Subscribed and sworn to before me this d of State of I' County of #riCN_-A-'I bf Notary Pu a�� ...ell• roo- 0 o� Date: 3�Z7�7 'L Pp1Y PUe ' •L \1L sraTa0 OF-FI ONLY nt Received: F Application No: P&Z Date(s): P &Z Action: Receipt No: Map Zone: Date Received: Received By: City Council (First Reading): City Council (Second Reading): City Council Action: Ordinance Number: Type of Request: N, S, E, W (Circle) Side of: N, S, E, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: Distance from Nearest Intersection: Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: Page 3 of 3 I V I t 1 t CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO 16.47 AC. INSTR. 199709170095761 P.N. 274 - 000004 N840 52'07"E 474.42' CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO 1.10 AC. INSTR. 201001070002142 P.N. 274 - 000086 0 u7 co O) PLACE OF I.-- � D r--� N / BEGINNING FOR A LO C) O KENDALE RIDGE 2.330 AC. TRACT w M o �_ SECTION 3 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED 00 � CO Q00 1.630 AC. 2 o � O �� P.B. 959 PG. 15 INSTR. 201611300163496 O N J J N Z a P.N. 274 - 000289 a Z LOT 1 A = 14° 16' 51" Z CO W Z R = 120.34'43 R = 126.50' L = 104.93' L = 31.53'• N890 59'14"W Ch = 101.64' Ch = 31.45' 42.60' N65° 21' 47 "W S390 01'02"W 64.40' S86° 50' 06 "W O \ aCITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO 0.022 AC. - PARCEL 30 -WDV 1 O INSTR. 201006080070543 W CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO Q ORIG. 1.722 AC. fx INSTR. 200808260129618 F P.N. 274- 000115 I A =51 °23'08" VACATED PORTION OF TUSWELL DRIVE (0.425 AC.) N43° 17'28"W 17.84' (0.044 AC.) CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO ORIG. 1.033 AC. INSTR. 200610110203729 P.N. 274 - 000083 S840 52'07"W 100.01' W 00 c�) N '*::;t CD r N "T 0 U) E-� Q l Q O 6 z� C C m o E C N o ULO n Ii r- u- I IU z I� (0.231 AC.) C p1 "\N TES _ – — LL D� r �L Q R - 194.79' CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO w L - 174.70' 0.159 AC. - PARCEL 27 -WDV -1 INSTR. 200905280076453 Ch = 168.90' N710 04' 13 "W A = 18° 40' 33" R = 158.00' L = 51.50' Ch = 51.27' S550 29'44"W O0 n _ C'6 co Oino Z W J O m of M O oar u-0 N 0 L) F—Nfj O ° N Z _ 0 Bird +Bull 3500 Snouffer Rd., Ste.225 Columbus, Ohio 43235 Ph: (614) 761-1661 Fax: (614) 761 -1328 WWW.BIRDBULL.COM 1 1 SCALE: 1" = 60' 0 60 120 I 180 GRAPHIC SCALE BASIS OF BEARINGS: Basis of bearings is the centerline of XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, being N 04° 09'55" E, derived from VRS observations referencing monument, PID designation ofAJ7184 and CORS_ID of COLB, Ohio South Zone, NAD 83 (2011 Adj.), and all other bearings are based upon this meridian. 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED EXHIBIT OF A 2.330 ACRE TRACT AT 6055 AVERY ROAD, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO 2.330 AC. IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NO, 3004 SCALE: 1" = 60' 1 JOB NO. 1 DWN: JRMJ CKD: I MARCH 31, 2017 1 17 -032 co O) / M M O D r--� N / 1 Zw° O moo �Q odo I I u- I �Qa! N r) ""Z O 0 O0 n _ C'6 co Oino Z W J O m of M O oar u-0 N 0 L) F—Nfj O ° N Z _ 0 Bird +Bull 3500 Snouffer Rd., Ste.225 Columbus, Ohio 43235 Ph: (614) 761-1661 Fax: (614) 761 -1328 WWW.BIRDBULL.COM 1 1 SCALE: 1" = 60' 0 60 120 I 180 GRAPHIC SCALE BASIS OF BEARINGS: Basis of bearings is the centerline of XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX, being N 04° 09'55" E, derived from VRS observations referencing monument, PID designation ofAJ7184 and CORS_ID of COLB, Ohio South Zone, NAD 83 (2011 Adj.), and all other bearings are based upon this meridian. 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED EXHIBIT OF A 2.330 ACRE TRACT AT 6055 AVERY ROAD, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO 2.330 AC. IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NO, 3004 SCALE: 1" = 60' 1 JOB NO. 1 DWN: JRMJ CKD: I MARCH 31, 2017 1 17 -032 March 31, 2017 DESCRIPTION OF A 2.330 ACRE TRACT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AVERY ROAD AND TUSWELL DRIVE, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey No. 3004 and being all or portions of the following four (4) tracts of land: 1. all of Lot No. 1, as shown upon the plat of Kendale Ridge Section 3, of record in Plat Book 95, Page 15, said Lot No. 1 having been conveyed to 6055 Avery Road Limited, by deed of record in Instrument No. 201611300163496, 2. a 0.231 acre portion of an original 1.033 acre tract of land conveyed to City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 200610110203729, 3. a 0.044 acre portion of an original 1.722 acre tract of land conveyed to City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 200808260129618, and 4. a 0.425 acre portion of vacated Tuswell Drive, vacated by Ordinance No. , all records referenced to the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point at a corner of the westerly right -of -way line of Avery Road (variable width), at the northeast corner of said Lot No. 1 and in the south line of a 1.10 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 201001070002142, said point being S 84° 52' 07" W a distance of 100.01 feet from Franklin County Monument No. 7750 Reset found in the original centerline of Avery Road and at the southeast corner of a 0.202 acre tract of land conveyed, as Parcel 36 -WDV for Avery Road roadway purposes, to the City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 201103310043452; thence S 04° 14' 28" E along the east line of said Lot No. 1, along the west right -of -way line of Avery Road and along the east line of that portion of vacated Tuswell Drive a distance of 216.43 feet to a point at the southeast corner of that portion of vacated Tuswell Drive, in the north line of said original 1.033 acre tract and at a northwest corner of a 0.752 acre tract of land conveyed, as Parcel 29 -WDV for Avery Road and relocated Tuswell Drive (variable width) roadway purposes, to the City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 200907140103098 and at a point of curvature; thence southwesterly crossing a portion of said original 1.033 acre tract, along a curved northwesterly line of said 0.752 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 126.50 feet, and delta = 14° 16' 51 ", arc length = 31.53 feet, a chord distance of 31.45 feet bearing S 39° 01' 02" W to a point of curvature; thence southwesterly crossing a portion of said original 1.033 acre tract, along a curved northwesterly line of said 0.752 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 158.00 feet, and delta = 18° 40' 33 ", arc length = 51.50 feet, a chord distance of 51.27 feet bearing S 55° 29' 44" W to a point of tangency; thence S 64° 50' 01" W crossing a portion of said original 1.033 acre tract and along the northwesterly line of said 0.752 acre tract a distance of 49.26 feet to a point at a corner of said 0.752 acre tract and at a point of curvature; thence westerly crossing a portion of said original 1.033 acre tract, along a curved northerly line of said 0.752 acre tract, crossing said original 1.722 acre tract, along the curved northeasterly line of a 0.159 acre tract of land conveyed, as Parcel 27 -WDV -1 for relocated Tuswell Drive roadway purposes, to the City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 200905280076453 and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 194.79 feet, and delta = 51 ° 23' 08 ", arc length = 174.70 feet, a chord distance of 168.90 feet bearing N 71 ° 04' 13" W to a point of tangency; thence N 43° 17' 28" W along the southwesterly line of said portion of vacated Tuswell Drive and along the new northeasterly right -of -way line of Tuswell Drive a distance of 17.84 feet to a point of curvature; Pagel of 2 17-032/Prelim—Project—Description March 31, 2017 thence northwesterly along the curved southwesterly line of said portion of vacated Tuswell Drive, along the new curved northeasterly right -of -way line of said Tuswell Drive and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 120.34 feet, and delta = 49° 57' 43 ", arc length = 104.93 feet, a chord distance of 101.64 feet bearing N 65° 21' 47" W to a point of tangency; thence N 89° 59' 14" W along the southerly line of said portion of vacated Tuswell Drive and along the new northerly right -of -way line of Tuswell Drive a distance of 42.60 feet to a point at the west corner of said vacated portion of Tuswell Drive, in the south line of said Lot No. 1 and in the existing north right - of -way line of Tuswell Drive (50 feet in width); thence S 86° 50' 06" W along the north right -of -way line of Tuswell Drive and along a portion of the south line of said Lot No. 1 a distance of 64.40 feet to a point at the southwest corner of said Lot No. 1 and at the southeast corner of said Lot No. 2, as shown upon said plat of Kendale Ridge Section 3; thence N 04° 17' 19" W along the west line of said Lot No. 1 and along the east line of said Lot No. 2 a distance of 141.63 feet to a point at the northwest corner of said Lot No. 1, at the northeast corner of said Lot No. 2 and in the south line of a 16.47 acre tract of land conveyed to the City of Dublin, Ohio, by deed of record in Instrument No. 199709170095761; thence N 84° 52' 07" E along the north line of said Lot No. 1, along a portion of the south line of said 16.47 acre tract and along a portion of the south line of said 1.10 acre tract a distance of 474.42 feet to the place of beginning; containing 2.330 acres of land, more or less, and being subject to all easements and restrictions of record. Of said 2.330 acres, 1.630 acres are within P.N. 274 - 000289, 0.231 acre is within P.N. 274 - 000083, 0.044 acre is within P.N. 274-000115 and 0.425 acre is within that vacated portion of Tuswell Drive P.N. 274- The above description was prepared by Jay R. Miller, Ohio Surveyor No. 8061, of Bird + Bull, Inc., Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, from an actual field survey, performed under his supervision, in March, 2017. Basis of bearings were derived from VRS observations referencing monument, PID designation of OHLC, Ohio North Zone NAD 83 (2011 Adj.), and all other bearings are based upon this meridian. Page 2 of 2 17- 032 /Prelim Project_ Description r+ �v n , %o�ir IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, Ofl G yO ,ti CITY OF DUBLIN, 1111111111111111 111111111Ni1111111111111111 200808260129618 �" Plaintiff, P91 a iaa Av rxoveaosag+a CASE NO.D7CVH- D2- Itrt�S c7 t]e128r2oU 2 33n" py�,pttENST C 1 G 4chg2.4m m-'t1nnni'Y V. Fran G No pwerd�r JUDGE G REECE N THANE AND STELLA THATCHER, et al. Defendants. c JUDGMENT ENTRY ON SETTLEMENT AND ENTRY GRAN TIlYG A FEE SIMPLE lNTIi;REST TO THE CITY QF DUBLIN It appears to the Court that the Defendants have agreed with the Plaintiff, City of Dublin ( "the City "), upon the amount of compensation and damages to be paid to Defendants, Thane and Stella Thatcher ( "Thatcher "), owners of real property described in the Complaint for Appropriation in this matter ( "Property "). The Parties have agreed Defendant Thatcher shall be paid the total sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($500,000.00). In consideration of the agreed upon compensation, as to the Property appropriated, Defendants do hereby agree to release all claims for further compensation, including interest, resulting from the appropriation of Property relating to the realignment and widening of Avery Road. Based on the foregoing, all Defendants agree to release the Plaintiff from all liability and claims arising from the above -styled matter. In conformity with this Agreement, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND DECREED that: The acquisition of a fee simple interest for the aforesaid purpose described in Exhibit "A ". 2. The Clerk of this Court shall forthwith furnish to the City, a certified copy of Entry; and, if required for recordation, the City shall obtain the necessary ap TRANSFERRED NWYANCE T EXEMPT AUG 2 6 2008 IN1292UU 21 1 . TESTA JosE�l� rA F AUDITOR FR&a1N 4oUNTK only ----' Franklin County Engineer of the Legal Description set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" and shall prepare and present to the Franklin County Auditor a Statement of Reason for the Exemption from Real Property Conveyance Fee pursuant to § 319.54 (G) of the Ohio Revised Code and shall in all other respects comply with any and all applicable provisions of the Ohio Revised Code and any and all applicable rules and regulations of the Franklin County Recorder and the Franklin County Auditor in connection therewith; and upon such presentation of such certified copy of this Entry so approved to the Recorder of Franklin County, Ohio, it shall be filed and recorded with the Recorder's Office at City's costs as set forth in paragraph 3 below. 3. All transfer fees of the County Auditor and the recordation fees of the County Recorder shall be charged as court costs herein pursuant to Ohio Revised Code § §163.15 and 163.16, and the City shall pay all court costs herein accrued. 4. The Clerk withhold from the deposited amount any accrued or past due real estate taxes due as of the date of the filing of this entry that are required to be paid in regards to the subject property pursuant to law as requested by the Franklin County Auditor and further that the Clerk shall receive from the Franklin County Auditor a statement of accrued real estate taxes prior to the date of the appropriation of the subject property by the City. 5. The City deposits with the Court an additional One Hundred and Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($190,000.00) and said deposit be released to the Defendant by a warrant payable to "Thane and Stella Thatcher and Attorneys William Goldman and Michael Braunstein" for settlement of this matter. 6. A record shall be made of these proceedings according to law. Judger. :G-uy L. Reedelt': Judge Guy L. Reese, II (H12921702 ( 2 APPROVED B 't': Philip K. Hartmann (0059413) Tricia C. Bell (0077983) Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn A Legal Professional Association 250 West Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 T: (614) 462- 2700/F: (614) 462 -5135 Attorneys for the City of Dublin Adria L. Fields / per fax consent / July 30,2008 Adria L. Fields (0064399) Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Franklin County Treasurer 373 South High Street, 17th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 Attorney for Franklin County Treasurer Ieixexuox William A. Goldman/ e-m@ l consent _ /_July 2$2008 William A. Goldman (0031362) Michael Braunstein (0060898) Of- Counsel, Crabbe, Brown & James, LLP 500 South Front Street, Suite 1200 Columbus, Ohio 43215 T:(614)229- 4540/F:(614)229 -4568 Attorneys for Defendants, Thane and Stella Thatcher I,JCi+NQ'��Y -CzR THE STATE OF OHIO pF tE MIRT OFCfitilA t Fraslk 111 County. "$ '�c:r� rjti - VID FOH HEREBY UM THATTHE ABOVEAN" Gom 15 TRULYTAY,ENAND WPiED FROMTHE ORnINA1 ....; 3�r f .......................... t*W ON nLE iN MY O6ci- 1 "$ FRY HAND AND SE: SAID COUNrT�Y ........DAY O % f ".. AD.244?6•• j4�#N O'GRADY, Perk EXHIBIT "A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ae.w ^r r 1373394 Index P&fCNA 274 -115 o,a. one 01041"1999 N.r.,.m.: DEBBIE N� THANE F. THATCHER SITUATE 'IN THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON IN THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN AND THE STATE OF OHIO; AN() OEING A PART OF SURVEY NO. 3004. VIRGINIA MILITARY LANDS AND ALSO BEING CONVEYED TO WAYNE AND NINA WOOD BY DEED A PART OF THAT 2.765 ACRE TRACT OF RECORD IN DEED BOOK 3509, PAGE 771, RECOROS OF THE RECORDER'S OFFIC9, 661NO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FAA14KLIN COUNTY. OHM. AND BEGINNING AT A SPIKE IN THE CENTERLINE OF AVERY ROAD AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY , CORNER OF THE ABOVE•MENT10NED WOOD TRACT; THENCE N 80 DEG. 30' 25' W OF SAID WOOD TRACT, THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE 0.060B ACRE TRACT CONVEYED TO RAY R. AND NANCY L. WALKER BY DEEO OF RECORD IN DEED BOOK 2710. PAGE 655, OF THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORDS, AND LINE OF DAN•SHERRI SUBDIVISION OF RECORD IN PLAT SOOK ALONG THE NORTHERLY 25. PAGE 94. OF THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORDS 400 FT. TO AN IRON PIN AT THE PASSING A 5 Fr.; 114EN I CE N S DEG. 24' 00' E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID WOOD TRACT AND ALONG THE REMAINING LANDS OF JACK V. FROST 3D4 FT. TO AN IRON PIN AT OF SAID WOOD TRACT: THENCE S Be DEG. 30' 26' E THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID WOOD TRACT AND REMAINING LANDS OF JACK V. FROST 100 F7. TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE 5 9 DEG. 24' 00' W ACROSS SAID WOOD THENCTC S 80 DEG. 30' 25' E ACROSS SAID WOOD TRACY S60,00 FT. TO AN IRON PIN; OF AVERY IROAD, PASSING AN IRON IN TRACT ON LINE AT 270 FTATHENCE S 9 DEG HI4'fl0'W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF VERY OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1.722 ACRES, MORE OR 0 ROAD 1$0.00 FT. TO THE PLACE LESS. t oil, V SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 1 BEING THE SAME PROPERTY CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3722, PAGE (.Q-7q) 84 OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO RECORDS. 1[5 I)ESCRI PTION VERIM" ��n,,F "4 C. RavcLr_ r.L.PS- BY:L-- �IIII�IIII�IA Instrument Number: 201611300163496 Recorded Date: 11/30/2016 12:24:23 PM Terry J. Brown Franklin County Recorder 373 South High Street, 181' Floor Columbus, OH 43215 (614) 525-3930 http://Recorder.FranklinCounty0hio.gov p Recorder @FranklinCounty0hio.gov ■ iFrankiinCountyRecorderTerryBrown 40 @RecorderBrown Transaction Number: T2( Document Type: DEED Document Page Count: 1 Submitted By (Walk -In): Return To (Mailing Label): STEVEN B VANSLYCK S -rEVEN B VANSLYCK 6253 RIVERSIDE DR STE 205 6253 RIVERSIDE DR STE 205 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 First Grantor: STONEHENGE CO Fees: Document Recording Fee: Total Fees: Amount Paid: Amount Due: Walk -In 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED Instrument Number: 201611300163496 $28.00 Recorded Date: 11 /30/2016 12:24:23 PM $28.00 $28.00 $0.00 OFFICIAL RECORDING COVER PAGE DO NOT DETACH THIS PAGE IS NOW PART OF THIS RECORDED DOCUMENT Mailing Label NOTE: If the document data differs from this cover sheet, the document data always supersedes the cover page. COVER PAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL DATA, PLEASE SEE INDEX AND DOCUMENT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 1113012016 12:24:23 PM TRANSFERRED NOV 3 0 2016 CLveam IL Wimw11 ')01305 CONVEYANCE TAX EXEMPT lLl c.x - CLARENCE I— MV40011 FRAWUN COUNTY AIATTOR Instrument #: 201611300163496 Page: 2 of 2 WARRANTY DEED BY A CORPORATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that THE STONEHENGE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, the Grantor, for Ten and No /iooths Dollars ($io.00) and other good and valuable consideration paid, grants, with general warranty covenants, to 6055 AVERY ROAD LIMITED, an Ohio limited liability company, the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, whose tax mailing address is 6253 Riverside Drive — Suite 200, Dublin Ohio 43017, that certain piece or parcel of Real property situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin and City of Dublin and being LOT NUMBER ONE in KENDALL RIDGE SECTION 3, as the same is numbered and delineated on the recorded plat thereof of record in Plat Book 95, page 15, Franklin County Records. Parcel No. 2-79- 000289 Prior instrument 199807210182017 Subject to conditions, restrictions, and easements, if any, contained in prior instruments of record, and to taxes and assessments, if any, now a lien and hereafter due and payable. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and caused our signatures to be affixed. THE HENGE COMPANY, Grantor By �� ~� - to •' c State of Ohio, Franklin County, ss. Acknowledged before me, a notary public in a nd For the state of Ohio, by Mo M. Dioun, in his official capacity as aforesaid, this ,AJCVelv,t� -4 L2, ,/� IN RY pU r�rE O1= 0N�o Prepared by: Steven B. VanSlyck, Attorney at Law 6253 Riverside Drive — Suite 2o5 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Stay Vsn5tych. ney at Law Notary tic - State of Ohio My Commission Has No Expiration Date J ■ T a� N F � 3 V V) o 200610110203729 "81 2 I, J 200$ 23 00 r2001530075225 BXS EWPAIT TIT Robert 6 Mcnlyomrry FranN lin Counly Records, GENERAL WARRANTY DEED* The Stonehenge Company, an Ohio Corporation, of Franklin County, Ohio, for valuable consideration paid, grant(s) with general warranty covenants, to City of Dublin, Ohio, an Ohio municipal co7)ration. whose tax mailing address is 5200 Emerald Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017, all of its interest in the following real property: SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN AND IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN; AND BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A SPIKE IN THE CENTERLINE OF AVERY ROAD, SAID SPIKE BEING NORTH 9° 24'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 135 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED WOOD TRACT; THENCE NORTH 80° 30'26" WEST ACROSS SAID WOOD TRACT AND ALONG A NORTHERLY LINE OF A CERTAIN 1.722 ACRE TRACT, 300 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE NORTH 9° 24' 00" EAST CONTINUING ACROSS SAID WOOD TRACT AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CERTAIN 1.77 ACRE TRACT 150 FEET TO AN IRON PIN IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID WOOD TRACT, SAID POINT BEING SOUTH 80° 30'26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID WOOD TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 80' 30' 26" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID WOOD TRACT AND THE REMAINING LANDS OF JOHN V. FROST 300 FEET TO A SPIKE IN THE CENTERLLNE OF AVERY ROAD AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID WOOD TRACT, PASSING AN IRON PIN ON LINE AT 270 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 9' 24' 00" WEST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF AVERY ROAD 150 FEET, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 1.033 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Subject to easements, conditions, covenants, restrictions and reservations of record, zoning ordinances and legal highways, and real estate taxes and assessments for the year 2006 and thereafter. DIFSCRIP'riul VFLLSFiFd7 274- 000083 -00 DEAN ttuvct� N•s?.�'s. BY ` ' S : — 6035 Avery Road, Dublin, Ohio 43016 ,— /� j T ..t,,•:*EZ Is's Instrument dumber 20060429Q0$QW94, Recordet;�i Franklin County. Ohio, Parcel No: Street Address: Prior Instrument Reference: -cam 0'tt p� Executed this 20th day of 00tobar 20046. The one eng an O ' Corporation io Its: Presi.deat TRANSFERRED A OCT 1 12006 PT E5RANKLR1J(,'(,11),V JOSCPH W. TESTA MIDITOR rRMKLIN SOU",, OHIO r . Page 1 of 2 Y IjDFMR (Hl))tlfiflifi I I I 11 t ran k I i i i HE IT REMOIBLIRLD. that On tilix I—Oth day of October 2006. hel'ore \t11Aj,V me. the Public in wtj fin, IiJid %t'ite. pCptj,jj..jljY CZ111le Mo Di(IL111. the of The Stonehenge -111 01110 C-011)0rafion. the Grantor in 2 Dved and avkwm. tcjgcd ille F 1. - n le roof, t ki be 11 IVhedt he i r voluntary Lt" and IN '11-,SITMONY �1 HEREOF. I hay hereunto syffs0ibed MY name and ark -d my C,11 oil the dad andyear -lam aforesaid. "o, qr- .mA 5302,05 and 5302.06 Ohio kevised Code prepared by: G J'C(Toj"y S. Baker. Esq, Schottenstein. Zox & Duna A LCLNII Professional Association 250 West Sjrcet Columbus. Ohio 43215-2538 Page 2ol'2 17- 031PDP /Z /FDP: PUD— *ANDREW GARDNER, P.E. WESTDALE PROPERTIES LLC KIDDIE ACADEMY 3500 SNOUFFER RD., STE. 225 6101 AVERY RD. COLUMBUS, OH 43235 DUBLIN, OH 43016 KENDALL RIDGE LTD 6253 RIVERSIDE DR. STE. 200 DUBLIN, OH 43017 James P Connolly & Donald A Delewese 6100 Avery Road Dublin, OH 43016 Lassaad Driss Jamie Schroyer Rajasckhara Vuyyuru 6331 Meaghan Drive 6121 Tuswell Drive 6323 Meaghan Drive Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Proposed Development Text As recommended to City Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 July 31, 2017 KENDALL RIDGE OFFICE/DAYCARE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT TEXT THE STONEHENGE COMPANY A. PERMITTEDUSES a The use of the parcel shall consist of an office /daycare center. B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a SETBACKS i. Right of Way: The building setback from the right -of -way of Avery Road shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The parking shall be setback 25 feet from the right -of -way. ii. Rear Yard: The building setback shall be 25 feet and the parking setback shall be 20 feet. iii. Side Yard: The building setback shall be 25 feet and the parking setback shall be 20 feet h Maximum Building Height: The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. c. Access: Access to the office /daycare shall be permitted only from Tuswell Drive and shall be a minimum of 200' from the centerline of Avery Road. d Parking Requirements: The required minimum parking spaces for the Office /Daycare is 1 space per 250 SF and shall compile with section 153.212 of the City of Dublin Code. C. DESIGN GUIDELINES a Office/Daycare Center: The building shall be a maximum of 10,000 sq. ft. in area Exterior materials shall be stone, brick, wood siding, or stucco . All sides of the building shall have equal quality in architecture and materials used and shall be coordinated with the residential buildings. The building shall be designed as a single story structure. Lot coverage for the office /daycare site shall not exceed 60% of the lot. h Parking Lot Lighting: Shall meet the requirements set by the City of Dublin to minimize the impact on the adjacent residential property. c. Signage: Signage for the office /daycare center shall be a monument sign limited to 6' in height and the sign area shall be regulated by Section 153.164 of the Proposed Development Text As recommended to City Council by the Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 July 31, 2017 Dublin Zoning Regulations. Any proposed signage shall be submitted to the City of Dublin for review and approval. d Landscaping: Landscaping for buffering, replacement trees, open spaces and the office /daycare center shall submitted (per the Final Development Plan) to the City of Dublin for review and approval. All trees that meet the definition of a protected tree by the City of Dublin code shall be saved or replaced on site in accordance with Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Code. e. Fencing: One type offence shall be used on the site subject to approval at the final development plan. Chain -link, board on board privacy and plastic fencing shall be prohibited. Any playground associated with a daycare shall be to the north and west of the building and surrounded by a 5' high wrought iron fence. D. UTILITIES a Storm Sewer: The existing retention basin and storm sewers from the adjacent Kendall Ridge Subdivision shall be a shared facility for the originally plated subdivision. The surface drainage for the site shall be handled on site and in conjunction with the existing retention basin and shall meet all applicable requirements of the City of Dublin. A It M X A N N IV N H c� ir O 929 92 928 stm �I C V Iv li j C:I I� II V a i r ell I II I I I 4t F— — — --I J I L, I I L_ - - - --- - - - - -- I II --------- - - - - -I r/w W. V. I - - - -- 0 _922— 923 924 924 23 922 - - -- -- - - -- _ Ex. Drainage Easement _ Tnstr 19980721018201- EXISTING RETENTION POND (0.9 ACRES) Ex. 15' Sanitary Easement P.B. 95, Pg. 15 ', _- �is0-. 111 NILO1� _ - -- — — — — — — — 41 -25'— -- r/ N89 °5 —_ —_ ------- - - - - -- L - -- F. H. --- -____— _— = =W ° — = = = =_ =__ —_ � - _ 20 ss, N. /// - I I III I EX DRIVEWAY CL F I I I I I lO I I 0 I w l C) -� I I I F -_j J 3 Q I z L I I I Lu -► I I I I I 1 I 3 1 _J —J \ f f I I \ f - I I g25 921 5' DECORATIVE METAL FENCE N840 52'07"E `9� 922 1 1 III I I i _ Of 21.78' �\ I I I 1 EB II I �oAl 1 . 7 10' PARKING SETBACK--\ 4' DECORATIVE I j II I I I METAL FENCE 25' BUILDING SETBACK--\ GqE a . QPROPOSED PRE- SCHOOL PLANTING AREA w PLAYGROUND 30' � I I II I I GATE GATE BUILDING z I I II SETBACK Y _ w I II I I I \ I PROPOSED Q I I II PLAYGROUND o ,. o j III N I 4' DECORATIVE w I I I I I I I I Q METAL FENCE GATE 4 � I I �' I \ w Co rperciial 5 DECORATIVE ,r, GATE 142.83 Slgn I I I I I I I METAL FENCE rn i GATE P WATER I I III I I I w ©H �v i PROPOSED �� PR. SANITARY SERVICE ;eERVICES J I III N PLAYGROUND 1 I I I I I Q 4. rn U I 5 II . . ° . , I - , - - - - a •e.. G :a • •e.. a .:`r,• e V a e• � GATE - . •' `r' I o I 1 TC= 925.20 �� L� T I a- I III / O G= 924.70 I oil -- - - - - - -- — �5'f- 8'- I- 8'- i- 8'- ;5'�3' JR3' PR. TRANSFORMER I w III /_ ,.a _ -• -- -- -- - _- 3 I I III I I I I I son - -- UGT Isan 11G I_ N N R3.8 G� I I I I 1 I \ --- - - -r/w - - -- R2' R3.82' S&�- I7GT - -- - — T.P. -. r� - -- - - -- � I -� I I 11 r� 26' rn I III I I �Q`� 30 Utility Easement w ,Q 49 °s Ins r. No. 19 X.__Waferline to be F.H�I I < 7 - x`43 \\ \\ Relocated by Others I NCh. °4 ?1 \ C 924.0 C= 24. 0 I I III I I ss°2,�o7s1 -� - -� - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- 3 - R30' \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ 925\ R3.82 EX. R/W TO BE VACATED _ R3.82' C PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN R20 (SEE SHEET SP -1 FOR DETAILS) A = 2630 00'45" R = 0.00' L = 0.00' Ch =0.00' N470 13' 15 "E \ R/W r/w / / -- 6w / \ 15'\ \ EX. LANDS TO BE 6P % °• \ 15' \ COMBINED WITH \\ /, LARGER PARCEL GI? P�� °� /ii \lC \\ \\\ a,s PR. WATERLINE 15'1 °-('� No 2 43,E BY OTHERS _ - -- r 9 8 G � \\ 04 Ex. Walk ;��� \ CrossWalk ��� I I I I T� li \\ SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE PAVEMENT LIMITS SITE DATE TABLE PROPERTY USE: EXISTING ZONING: ADJACENT ZONING NORTH: ADJACENT ZONING SOUTH: ADJACENT ZONING EAST: ADJACENT ZONING WEST: DAYCARE FACILITY PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT, PUD NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, NC LIMITED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL, R-1113 RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, R -1 PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT, PUD TOTAL EXISTING SITE AREA: 2.33 ACRES EXISTING LOT COVERAGE: 0.01 ACRES (0.43 %) PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 0.76 ACRES (32.62 %) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 0.97 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (PRE): 0.01 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA (POST): 0.76 ACRES PARKING SETBACK: 10' (FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY) -NORTH & WEST 25' (TUSWELL DRIVE AND AVERY ROAD) - SOUTH & EAST BUILDING SETBACK: 30' (FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY) EAST 25' (FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY) NORTH 25' (TUSWELL DRIVE) N/A (FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY) WEST OWNER / DEVELOPER THE STONEHENGE COMPANY 6253 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 200 DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 PHONE: 614 - 509 -9000 CONTACT: MO DIOUN EMAIL: MO.DIOUN @STONEHENGE- COMPANY.COM ARCHITECT HARPER ARCHITECTURAL 105 COMMERCE PARK DRIVE, #A WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43082 PHONE: 614 - 895 -2050 CONTACT: SCOTT HARPER EMAIL: SCOTT @HARPERAE.COM SIGNATURES PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SECRETARY PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT 0 qj Bird+Bull 3500 Snouffer Road, Ste. 225 Columbus, Ohio 43235 Ph: (614) 761 -1661 Fax: (614) 761 -1328 WWW.BIRDBULL.COM ENGINEER/SURVEYOR C.F. BIRD & R.J. BULL, INC. 3500 SNOUFFER ROAD SUITE 225 COLUMBUS, OH 43235 PHONE: 614 - 761 -1661 FAX: 614- 761 -1328 CONTACT: ANDREW GARDNER, P.E. EMAIL: AGARDNER @BIRDBULL.COM KIDDIE ACADEMY 6055 AVERY ROAD DUBLIN, OHIO 43016 DATE DATE DATE DATE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' 1 JOB NO. 5 DWN :SG I CKD :AAG I DATE: 05/22/2017 1 17 -032 a �II �I PI I GL �TAOND AERATOR i -� � ter— o<----------- - - -�__ A? — -- SL 3 BC SAN O \ f \ PI P� HM to - -------- __ _ BB 6 p BB; 4 2 2 6 t� EA EA EA DL 1 24" HT. 27 ^t� j+,3- 6 FIT 5 RUBBLE TV 5 11 WALL BB BB EA � I 2 18r r III\ ' i 1l . i <_- - — — — — — LE 8 r -- — — — — — — — — -`- - - - -- 7 i 10 12 SA 10 7 - -SG i SP TV LP !II� I 2 (2 H- \ 8 _ A SG CONSTRUCTION NOTES 10; COMMON NAME LATIN NAME `V 1 \ 13 10 BALDCYPRESS \ SG 2.5" CAL. 0 0 0 10 O SEED AREA �. 2.5" CAL, O MULCH AREA 20 IVORY SILK LILAC TREE o. I I 2.5" CAL. SL O EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN �1 TILIA TOMENTOSA 2" CAL. LE 5 LACEBARK ELM ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 2" CAL. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 5 KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER AND UTILITY COMPANIES THE LOCATIONS OF ALL 2" CAL. -- UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TO DETERMINE, IN THE FIELD, THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND LONDON PLANE TREE PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR NOT. THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: 9 CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UTILITY PROTECTION SERVICE 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. LIQUIDAMBAR SYRACIFLUA 2" CAL. 2. EXAMINE FINISH SURFACE, GRADES, TOPSOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH. DO NOT START ANY LOT COVERAGE: HEDGE MAPLE WORK UNTIL UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. VERIFY LIMITS OF WORK - VEHICULAR USE AREA = 19 S.F. REVISIONS BEFORE STARTING. - BUILDING AREA = 10,000 S.F. 3. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ALL DAMAGES TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BEARS 1. VEHICULAR USE SCREENING REQUIREMENT: L RESPONSIBILITY FOR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE. (1 tree per 40' Ift & 3.5' ht mound or hedge) SHEET: 320 Ift = 8 trees required 4. ALL PLANT MASSES TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN BARK MULCH BID. 12 Site Trees @ 2" Cal. provided along Churchman Rd. Evergreen Hedge Provided 5. BID LINE TO BE NO LESS THAN 18" AND NO MORE THAN 24" FROM OUTER EDGE OF PLANT MATERIAL BRANCHING. 2. INTERIOR LANDSCAPING FOR VEHICULAR USE (for every 100sf. of vehicuiar use requires 5sf. of landscape) 6. ALL SHRUBS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4' -0" FROM PAVEMENT EDGE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY 19,001 S.F. Parking provided requires 950 S.F. of landscape. NOTED OTHERWISE 1,044 S.F. of landscape bed provided. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN LAWN AREAS. 3. TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT: (1 tree for every 5000sf. of ground coverage) 8. FINE GRADE LAWN AREAS TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH AND CONTINUAL GRADE, FREE OF Total Ground Coverage: 29,011 S.F. IRREGULARITIES OR DEPRESSIONS. 6 trees at 2" cal. required and provided. 9. IN AREAS DESIGNATED "ANNUALS ". LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SOIL WITH 4. SITE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS- BUSINESS COMM. SHOPPING MINIMUM 8" DEEP PLANT MIXTURE AND A MINIMUM 2" DEEP BARK MULCH FOR SUBSEQUENT 2% of building ground coverage PLANTING BY OWNER, 10,010 x 2 %= 200 S.F. required PLANT LIST 445 SF rovided . . p 10. QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO ASSIST CONTRACTOR IN EVALUATING THEIR OWN TAKE -OFFS AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED AS ACCURATE REPRESENTATIONS OF REQUIRED 5. TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT: MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS BID QUANTITIES AS Minimum spacing between this and other trees shall be 40 feet for large REQUIRED BY THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS. trees. 30 feet for medium trees, and 20 feet for small trees 9 Existing street trees to remain 11. COORDINATE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION WITH INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER, 3 Additional street trees required and provided along Tuswell Drive SYSTEM OF APPLICABLE). 5 Additional street trees required and provided along Avery Road. 12. WHERE PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS OCCUR UNDER EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OR 6. TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT: CROWD EXISTING TREES, NOTIFY THE CONSULTANT TO ADJUST TREE LOCATIONS. 78" Of tree removal = 32 trees at 2.5" required 32 Deciduous trees provided OOVERALL SITE LAYOUT PLAN Scale: 1" = 60' -0" S\W\ W� 2 2 Ea FG �c 17 F > FG 8 FG TV 8 HT. RUBBLE WALL FG ----- _�- -P"� 10; COMMON NAME LATIN NAME `V 1 BC 10 BALDCYPRESS I' I III 2.5" CAL. 0 0 0 10 GREENSPIRE LINDEN �. 2.5" CAL, IS 20 IVORY SILK LILAC TREE o. I I 2.5" CAL. SL ` SG .r SG SG TILIA TOMENTOSA 2" CAL. LE 5 LACEBARK ELM ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 2" CAL. KC 5 KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS 2" CAL. LP 8 LONDON PLANE TREE PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 2" CAL. SW 9 SWEET GUM LIQUIDAMBAR SYRACIFLUA 2" CAL. HM 6 HEDGE MAPLE ACERCAMPESTRE 2 REVISIONS DATE: MAY 25, 2017 DRAWN BY TIM OSTERFELD L 2 CODE QTY. COMMON NAME LATIN NAME SIZE BC 10 BALDCYPRESS TAXODIUM DISTICHUM 2.5" CAL. GL 8 GREENSPIRE LINDEN TILIA CORDATA 2.5" CAL, IS 20 IVORY SILK LILAC TREE SYRINGA RETICULATA 2.5" CAL. SL 3 SILVER LINDEN TILIA TOMENTOSA 2" CAL. LE 5 LACEBARK ELM ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 2" CAL. KC 5 KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS 2" CAL. LP 8 LONDON PLANE TREE PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA 2" CAL. SW 9 SWEET GUM LIQUIDAMBAR SYRACIFLUA 2" CAL. HM 6 HEDGE MAPLE ACERCAMPESTRE 2" CAL. ce 2 2 I8 IS jb ZEV"FLOPMENT SIGN EA 20 EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE THETA OCCIDENTALIS'SMARGARD' 6' HL DL 36 DWARF KOREAN LILAC SYRINGA RETICULATA 3 GAL. TV 64 FRAGRANT VIBURNUM VIBURNUM CARLISII 3 GAL. SG 117 SEA GREEN JUNIPER JUNIPERUS'SEA GREEN' 3 GAL. BB 32 NORTHERN BAYBERRY MYRICAPENNSYLVANICA 3 GAL. SP 10 DWARF SHORE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS CONFERTA 3 GAL. FS 14 GROW LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC RHOS AROMATICA 3 GAL. FG 67 FOUNTAIN GRASS PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 2 GAL. LA 18 MUNSTEAD LAVENDER LAVANDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA 1 GAL. nns 0 10 20' 40' THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTED AND IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF BLENDON GARDENS INC IT SHASFERR BE REPRODUCED, ISE USED OR OTHERWISE USED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. FBI O I� O w ^W� Q a I—I U Q ¢ d u, W" a 0 Zon 0 O FBI H O P4 REVISIONS DATE: MAY 25, 2017 DRAWN BY TIM OSTERFELD L PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET: L, -2 N Z LU Q �o� O �zo W — F J — v� W o c0 .00 a THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTED AND IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF BLENDON GARDENS INC IT SHASFERR BE REPRODUCED, ISE USED OR OTHERWISE USED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. FBI O I� O w ^W� Q a I—I U Q ¢ d u, W" a 0 Zon 0 O FBI H O P4 REVISIONS DATE: MAY 25, 2017 DRAWN BY TIM OSTERFELD CHECKED BY B. THORNTON PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET: L, -2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1' -0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 118' = 1' -0- WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /B" = 1' -0' O 0 r U W H 2 U a W a a x 0 0 H x D: a O U vV V �vV �v SCALE: 1/8 " =1' -0" STONE VENEER WAINSCOT W17l � IS ll I a �aI aal tg�6' Ull — Ill 8aa erg la ®ea __._ __ lal _.__�_�— STONE WATERTABLE ON STONE VENEER WAINSCOT HALF -ROUND DORMER -_ STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH COPPER PATINA t /l STONE VENEER ON TOP OF STUCCO FINISH STONE WATERTABLE ON STONE WATERTABLE STONE VENEER WAINSCOT ON STONE VENEER WAINSCOT STONE VENEER WAINSCOT f— METAL COPING DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLE bF 12 �6 /'ter new � I' DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW FLAIIJACK. ARCH EAST ELEVATION (TYPICAL) .SCALE: 1 18' = 1' -0" (TYPICAL) DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW NORTH ELEVATION SCALE. 1f8" = 1' 0' DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW STONE VENEER ON TOP OF STONE WATERTABLE ON STONE. VENEER WAINSCOT METAL COPING DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLE 12 6� DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW FLAT +JACK. ARCH (TYPICAL) ELEVATION FINISH SCHEDULE FIBERGLASS ASHPHALT ROOF SHINGLES OWENS CORNING - OAKRIDGE SHINGLE ESTATE GRAY CAST STONE WATERTABLE ROCKCAST -COLOR SAVANNAH MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER DUTCH QUALITY STONE - GREAT LAKES LIMESTONE MODULAR BRICK VENEER REDLAND BRICK - #945 FLUSH OVERSIZE ALLEGHENY HANDCRAFT -NO PURPLE STUCCO FINISH DRYVIT OR EQUAL (IF APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT ANDOWNER) COLOR - SHERWIN WILLIAMS. SW 7558 MEOICI IVORY WOOD TRIM COLOR - SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW2833 ROYCROFTVELLUM 6 ROUND DORMER DING SEAM METAL ROOF COPPER PATINA DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = i' -0" I U) jy o h � (fj r J a lY ~ C W LL 2 f LL U Q Im Z a Z N Q If S O G 0 RECORD OF ACTION City of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following actions at this meeting: Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos PUD, Kiddie Academy 6055 Avery Road 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary and Final Development Plans Proposal: A rezoning of a 2.33 -acre site from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos), R -1 Restricted Suburban Residential District, and R -1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Daycare) to permit a 10,000- square -foot daycare center and associated site improvements. The site is northwest of the intersection of Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Planned District rezoning under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and approval of Preliminary and Final Development Plans under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Andrew Gardner, Bird +Bull Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: Mr. Brown motioned, Ms. Mitchell seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with the following condition: 1) That the development text be updated to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. *Andrew Gardner agreed. VOTE: 7 — 0 RESULT: The Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan was forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes Page 1 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov 2. Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos PUD, Kiddie Academy 6055 Avery Road 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary and Final Development Plans MOTION #2: Mr. Brown motioned, Mr. Miller seconded, to approve the Final Development Plan with six conditions: 1) That the landscape wall design along Avery Road be revised to a stacked limestone wall design to be verified at Building Permitting; 2) That the fence location be updated along the north elevation to comply with the development standards and be located in the buildable area of the lot; 3) That the proposed fencing detail be updated to confirm the fence will be of a wrought -iron style; 4) That all mechanicals be painted to match the structure; 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting; and 6) That the applicant work with the City Engineer to modify the angle of the access drive off Tuswell Drive. *Andrew Gardner agreed to six conditions. VOTE: 7 — 0 RESULT: The Final Development Plan was approved. .1;10101.1014 BILT16) d 4-1 Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes F]10JZ6l4:i00W-N0 to] 0 Nichole M. Martin, Planner I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov o!ucgf lin OHIO, USA MEETING MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, June 22, 2017 Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos PUD, Kiddie Academy 6055 Avery Road 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning - Preliminary and Development Plan and Final Development Plan The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is for a rezoning of a 2.33 -acre site from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos), R -1 Restricted Suburban Residential District, and R -113, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Daycare) to permit a 10,000- square -foot daycare center and associated site improvements. She said the site is northwest of the intersection of Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. She said this is a request for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and approval of a Final Development Plan, she said, under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. She said swearing -in is required for the Final Development Plan portion. The Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission in regard to this case. Nichole Martin said the PZC reviewed this application at the meeting on May 181. She said she will present the highlights of the updates to this application, based on the Commission's comments. Ms. Martin presented an aerial view of the site that includes three parcels as well as a vacated City of Dublin right -of -way. She noted that parcels to the south are remnants from the construction of the roundabout at Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. As part of an Ordinance 67 -06, she reported the City agreed to vacate the right -of -way just north of those parcels and combined the parcels as well as the vacated right -of -way with the 1.63 acres to the north that is currently zoned as part of the Kendall Ridge Office and Condominium Planned Unit Development; therefore, the total site area is 2.33 acres. As part of the rezoning application, she said Planning reviews the application against the Community Plan and Future Land Use recommendations. She said the daycare use is consistent with the neighborhood Office and Institutional recommendation for density as found in the Community Plan. She explained that rezoning is required for an existing PUD when either general development standards for a geographic area or use and density are unable to be met. She said in this instance, the rezoning portion and Preliminary Development Plan portion is required to incorporate the additional area into a new Planned District as well as to permit a density increase from 7,500 square feet to 10,000 square feet for the daycare facility on the 2.33 acres. Ms. Martin said the Final Development Plan portion of this request remains the same as the Commission previously reviewed it as follows: • 10,000- square -foot daycare; • 40 -space parking lot; • Three fenced play areas with play structures; PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 • Dumpster enclosure; • Sidewalk to the public right -of -way; • Sign; and • Additional landscaping. Ms. Martin noted that the Commission had concerns at the May meeting with the architecture and treatment along the Avery Road frontage; site layout and access; and some of the operations of the daycare play areas. In response to that, she reported, the applicant has updated their plans to eliminate the fence along the Avery and Tuswell elevations. She said they have also clarified that the fence height is proposed to be five feet around the outer most exterior and the fence will be four feet in the internal divided areas. She reported that a height of five feet is consistent with what was previously permitted in the PUD text from the Kendall Ridge Daycare Office and Condominiums. She said the applicant has revised the architecture along Avery Road and they have extended the stone wall feature to provide more enclosure along the northern edge. She noted the applicant has updated the landscape plan to be consistent with the landscape inspector's requests, which were outlined in the previous Planning Report. Ms. Martin said the applicant is also proposing a pre - school garden area along the northern edge that was not previously proposed; this bumps the proposed fence into the building setback area, therefore, a condition of approval is that the fence be moved within the buildable area of the lot, which will likely prohibit the use of that area as a pre - school garden. Ms. Martin presented the proposed elevations; the architectural character remains the same — traditional single -story building, primarily clad in the limestone veneer with an ivory Stucco finish with residential window features. Along Avery Road, she stated the applicant has added a double door entrance as well as a decorative door on the maintenance room. Ms. Martin said staff recommends approval to City Council for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with the following condition: 1) That the development text be updated to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. Ms. Martin said approval is recommended for the Final Development Plan with 5 conditions: 1) That the landscape wall design along Avery Road be revised to a stacked limestone wall design consistent with the Dublin character throughout the City; 2) That the fence location be updated along the north elevation to be within the building setback; 3) That the proposed fencing detail be updated to confirm the fence will be of a wrought -iron style; 4) That all mechanicals be painted to match the structure; and 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting. Chris Brown requested a definition of the wrought -iron style' fence requested. Ms. Martin said that language is commonly used in the texts for Dublin's daycare centers and it is typically an aluminum fence painted black in that style. Mr. Brown asked if the language be changed to a durable metal fence. Amy Salay asked if the rubble wall was the same as stacked stone. Ms. Martin said Staff 's intention with this condition is that it be a Dublin -style stacked stone wall with bookends and the wall would be held together with mortar. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 6 The Chair invited the applicant to come forward Andrew Gardner, 3500 Snouffer Road, Columbus, Ohio, said he was with Bird + Bull Engineers and Surveyors and the civil engineer for the Stonehenge Company representing this project. He stated he is in support of the condition about the wall detail. He indicated the applicant revised the elevation by adding the double door on the east elevation, by adding landscaping on that elevation, and eliminating the fence on the south and east elevations. He concluded the intent was to address all of the Commission's concerns heard from the May meeting. Mr. Brown inquired about the internally illuminated sign dimensions. Mr. Gardner said he understands they need to revise the size of the sign but believes the letters are illuminated. Chris Commarota, Kiddie Academy Franchise, 3415 Box Hill Corporate Center, Abingdon, MD, 21009, clarified the sign is an aluminum face with acrylic letters that are punched through the aluminum so it almost looks like a halo sign; the face of the letters are opaque and the light comes through clear acrylic around the shape of the letter. Cathy De Rosa inquired about the design style of the fence the applicant intends to use. Mr. Gardner indicated the intent will most likely be an aluminum fence painted black to simulate a wrought iron type fence. Mr. Commarota clarified the picket fence has panels t8 feet apart, space between the t5/8"' of an inch by t5/8"' of an inch, size of pickets is t3.5 inches, and they come prefinished in black. He said the posts are t2.5 inches square and there is a bottom rail and two top rails that are separated by about t6 inches. The Chair said if there were no more questions, she would invite the public to speak Dale Bruggeman, 6105 Tuswell Drive, said he understood Staff to say the proposal generally consists with the vision of the special area plan and that is the Avery Road Community Plan. He asked if there were discussions with Engineering, specific to the parcels north of this property because the Planning Report does not state what happens north. He said in 2012, it was decided that there would not be any left in /left outs in between Tuswell Drive and Shier Rings Road. Mr. Bruggeman said he recalls this was intended to be a daycare center back in 2008 and does not believe anyone in the development disagrees with that use but increasing the size to 10,000 square feet and eliminating the road, the connector into the parcels that are north of this, blows the Community Plan. Mr. Bruggeman said there are no adjacent uses now but the northern parcels are going to be impacted on how they access Avery Road and if that left in /left out is eliminated, the residents on those northern parcels are going to have limited access. Mr. Bruggeman concluded by asking if Kiddie Academy is planning on accepting Title 20 as part of their enrollment process. After finding there was no one else from the public that wanted to speak, the Chair closed the public portion of the meeting. Mr. Commarota said the franchisee has not decided yet whether they will accept Title 20 as they are still in the early stages of planning but will decide prior to opening. The Chair asked Engineering to address the traffic concerns. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 6 Aaron Stanford said the roundabout has been installed since the original plan so the parcels off to the north very likely would have some form of restricted access. But one of the benefits of the roundabout is that turns can be made in a very short distance and provide mobility to head back north. He offered to continue the discussion with Mr. Bruggeman outside of this meeting. Mr. Brown asked what kind of screening is planned for the north side of the building. Mr. Gardner answered there is an existing tree line on that side so no additional landscape screening is planned. He noted the previous iteration of this proposal had a fence adjacent to the sidewalk but after hearing that should be eliminated, that prompted the idea for using that area for gardening projects. Mr. Commarota indicated there will be little units placed out in the garden area above grade for the children that are 3 -foot by 3 -foot or 3 -foot by 4 -foot in size, elevated to waist level so a lot of room is not needed and the raised beds will be assigned to different classes. Steve Stidhem asked if the applicant had conversations with the neighborhood association as that is usually a good thing to do. Mr. Gardner stated that the developer is not in attendance this evening but he is here to represent them and he reported they have not had any direct conversations with the association. He said they tried to reach out today to the three residents that spoke at the May meeting; they reached one but left voice mails for the other two residents. Mr. Stidhem recalled that the public input received at the May meeting was not all positive. He stated he is a big fan of working with the neighborhood and addressing their concerns to make sure they are on board with a project like this. This has been planned to be a daycare center for a long time, which he said he understands, but more effort should have been made to work with the neighborhood as he can see their point of view, which mainly involves traffic. Overall, he told the applicant he appreciated that they addressed a lot of concerns the Commission had. He said he understands Engineering's explanation of the restriction for where the entrance can be placed but there might be some other alternatives to block that light pollution that will occur there. He inquired more about the access for the northern parcels because there is no way to have a pass- through over to Tuswell Drive; they would go off that service road just to the north. Mr. Stanford reiterated that there is likely to be some restrictions to movement in the short term if that were to develop tomorrow. Long term, to the north of this area, he said could be an area that is likely to have a roundabout at Avery and Shier Rings Roads, which would create more mobility. He emphasized that every single site that is developed in Dublin does not have full access to every movement; they just do not. He indicated there are some areas that need to take the compromises for safety because of volume. He said Engineering does not guarantee full movements at every drive -way. Roundabouts give more mobility they have found, and increases the directions those people from drive -ways can move. Mr. Stidhem said he was not super concerned about traffic as he feels it is something that will take care of itself; he was just voicing the concerns of the residents since the applicant did not take the time to work with the residents on this. Cathy De Rosa said she appreciated that the applicant listened to what the residents had to say at the last meeting and made adjustments in response to the Commission's concerns. She said the removal of the fence along Avery Road is a big improvement along with the wrought -iron style fence and additional landscaping proposed. She stated the five- foot -tall fence makes sense. She said she was surprised and disappointed that there was not a bigger effort made to reach out to the residents given all the input voiced at the May meeting. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 6 Ms. Salay said the general practice is to encourage applicants to reach out to residents in adjacent properties. Ms. Martin said that happened in the pre - submittal phase by meeting with Stonehenge. Ms. Salay said Kendall Ridge has its own neighborhood association. Mr. Brown said he looks at the overall impact of the property and the use of it and the applicant addressed the Commission's concerns. He said it is on a busy road and traffic continues to be a contentious issue but this will have a fairly low impact on traffic with this use. Bob Miller said he agrees with Mr. Brown in how the applicant has addressed the Commission's comments. He indicated he knows Title 9 pretty well but inquired about Title 20 as it pertains to enrollment. Ms. Salay explained that Title 20 is for low income families that make a certain amount of money and they can receive funds to assist them for finding childcare because childcare can be so unaffordable. She indicated it can be difficult to find a good center that accepts Title 20 participants. Mr. Miller said headlights coming into the windows of homes was discussed at length at the May meeting. He asked if Engineering had the opportunity to find ways to turn that driveway or move it. Mr. Stanford answered additional information was provided in the packet. He said the general location of that driveway is set in that agreement; it was put in place because Engineering did not want the site to access Avery Road and with the roundabout being added, Engineering had to place this as far away from that intersection as possible so that is why there is a push to the west. He suggested fine tweaking the alignment as it intersects to the road but he cannot be certain that would have a major impact for preventing headlights into the windows of the residence. Mr. Miller suggested turning that driveway to the southeast just a little bit. Mr. Stanford added Engineering is considering what becomes left of the property on the south side of Tuswell Drive; they want to align driveways of that future development, if anything were to happen there too. He reiterated they want to keep it as far west as they possibly can or at some point it becomes too close to the roundabout. Victoria Newell asked why access onto Avery Road is inappropriate. Mr. Stanford explained that any parcel that requires a means of ingress /egress, other than a major arterial that has much higher volumes and speeds, Engineering is always going to encourage a second means of access for safety, capacity, and function of the roadway. As Engineering took the roundabout into consideration they determined access off Tuswell Drive would work really well. Deborah Mitchell reiterated the comments made by the Commission about the importance of reaching out to adjacent property owners. Ms. Newell thanked the applicant for incorporating a number of the Commission's concerns from the last meeting and that she appreciated Staff reviewing traffic issues. She agreed this is the best location for the drive and stated she is comfortable with the application. She concluded she always appreciates when a developer reaches out to the residents. Ms. Martin posted the condition for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan: 1) That the development text be updated to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. The Chair asked the applicant if they were in agreement with that condition, to which Mr. Gardner answered affirmatively. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission June 22, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan. The vote was as follows: Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Approved 7 — 0) Ms. Martin again posted the five conditions related to the Final Development Plan. 1) That the landscape wall design along Avery Road be revised to a stacked limestone wall design to be verified at Building Permitting; 2) That the fence location be updated along the north elevation to comply with the development standards and be located in the buildable area of the lot; 3) That the proposed fencing detail be updated to confirm the fence will be of a wrought -iron style; 4) That all mechanicals be painted to match the structure; and 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting. The Chair asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the five conditions, to which Mr. Gardner answered affirmatively. Mr. Miller asked if a condition could be added to state that Engineering would work on the re- alignment of that drive. Ms. Martin affirmed that if we want to monitor the location, a condition should be added because the Commission would be approving a Site Plan with this Final Development Plan. Mr. Gardner clarified the Commission is requesting to modify the angle that the driveway is intersecting with Tuswell Drive and not necessarily the location. The sixth condition was added as follows: 6) That the applicant work with the City Engineer to modify the angle of the access drive off Tuswell Drive. The Chair asked the applicant if he was in agreement with the sixth condition to which he answered affirmatively. Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Mr. Miller seconded to approve the Final Development Plan with six conditions. The vote was as follows: Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Approved 7 — 0) Steve Stidhem noted this would have been an awesome opportunity to have required the applicant provide renewable energy for this new building. He said he understands the City does not have everything in place to do that but he is going to keep saying it. When the City approves a new building there is an opportunity for renewable energy versus trying to retrofit an existing building. Vince Papsidero added there is a zoning side to that which requires Code updates and then there is a Building Code side, which we have nothing to do with as it is outside our purview. Mr. Stidhem emphasized that the Zoning Code is within our purview and we could start with that. Chris Brown asked if that would require a directive from City Council. Mr. Stidhem said we will not have change unless we start somewhere. Mr. Papsidero indicated that EcoDublin is getting re- started and the Zoning Code is part of that larger scope of work that involves our Staff. He said that could come up as well as a lot of other similar issues. city 4 of Dublin OHIO, UST PLANNING REPORT Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, June 22, 2017 Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD, Kiddie Academy — REZONI NG/PRELM I NARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN /FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Agenda Item 1 Case Number 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Proposal A rezoning of a 2.33 -acre site from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos), R -1 Restricted Suburban Residential District, and R -1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Daycare) to permit a 10,000- square -foot daycare center and associated site improvements. Request Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Planned District Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Site Location Northwest of the intersection of Avery Road and Tuswell Drive Applicant Andrew Gardner, Bird +Bull Engineering Case Managers Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner 1 (614) 410 -4675 or chusak @dublin.oh.us Nichole M. Martin, Planner 1 (614) 410 -4635 or nmartin @dublin.oh.us Recommendation Approval to City Council of the Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval is recommended with 1 Condition. 1) The development text be updated to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 2 of 19 Approval of the Final Development Plan with 5 Conditions In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteria and the existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this request with the following conditions: Final Development Plan Conditions 1) That the landscape wall design along Avery Road be revised to a stacked limestone wall to be verified at Building Permitting; 2) That the fence location be updated along north elevation to comply with the development standards, and be located in the buildable area of the lot; 3) That the proposed fencing detail be updated to confirm the fence will be of a wrought -iron style; 4) That all mechanicals be painted to match the structure; and, 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting. Site Area Surrounding Zoning And Uses Case Background City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 4 of 19 2.33 acres t The site is comprised of the three separate parcels and City of Dublin right -of -way. The existing zoning includes: • PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos) • R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District R -1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Zoning) North: NC, Neighborhood Commercial District, Washington Township Zoning (Vacant Land) South: Right -of -way (Tuswell Drive) East: Right -of -way (Avery Road) West: PUD, Planned Development District, Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos (Two - family homes) The site is comprised of a 1.63 -acre parcel, right -of -way for old Tuswell Drive (0.425 -acre) and portions of City -owned parcels acquired for the relocation of Tuswell Drive (0.275- acre). The existing PUD has residential and office /daycare components. As a result of the construction of the Avery Road and Tuswell Drive roundabout, the City acquired land. As a result a number of parcels fragmented parcels and zoning districts were created. A final development plan was approved for the residential component, which was subsequently constructed in 2001. Ordinance 67 -06, approved on August 4, 2008, authorized the vacation of the old Tuswell Drive right -of -way and its dedication to the applicant. The City and the applicant have also agreed to incorporate the additional City -owned land south of the right -of- way to be vacated into this development parcel. In coordination with the Law Director's office, the parcels are being combined to align with the rezoning area as proposed with this application. Therefore the rezoning will include a total of 2.33 acres. 'acts City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 5 of 19 • A 1.63 -acre parcels owned by the Stonehenge Company with a retention pond on the western portion which accommodates stormwater for the parcel and the surrounding residential development • A tree row along northern property line and evergreen trees around the pond • 50 -foot wide right -of -way to be vacated • Remnants of two separate parcels owned by the City and acquired for the realignment of Tuswell Drive, currently maintained as open space by the City On May 18, 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposal. The Commission expressed concern regarding architecture and landscaping along Avery Road, site layout and access, and fencing. In response, the applicant has updated the proposal, as follows: • Eliminated fence on Avery Road and Tuswell Drive elevations • Clarified the fence height at five feet tall along the perimeter with four -foot tall playground dividers • Addition of pre - school garden along north elevation • Provided foundation plantings along Avery Road • Additional architectural detail along Avery Road • Extension of stone wall along Avery Road with rubble wall detail • Provided additional landscape plantings at entry on Tuswell Drive • Made landscape material substitutions per the request of the City's Landscape Inspector iminary Development A rezoning to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation; the Zoning Code covers all requirements not addressed in the development text. A preliminary development plan is also required. The proposed development text establishes a new PUD (Kendall Ridge Office /Daycare). A rezoning is required in a district already zoned PUD when permitted uses, development standards, or geographic area are unable to be met through other provisions (minor text modifications or administrative approvals). The applicant is requesting a rezoning to revise the size of the developable parcel to incorporate the additional land discussed above and to increase the permitted size of the daycare. Details Proposal Community Plan Future Land Use City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 6 of 19 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Planill The proposal is for an approximately 10,000- square -foot daycare with associated site improvements including a 40 space parking lot, three fenced play areas with play structures, dumpster enclosure, sidewalk to the public right -of -way, and ,R - ; qC- -- additional landscaping. A "0O9 "s ' "SrR 201°010'0° °2102 9ENCHMARK Rt retention basin located on the western portion of the boss AvLIE aoAO J site provides stormwater LIMIIhU RR. BLDG P 630 C. management for the �I ]NSlF. 201611 3001 GP III ____- ~ - n p g d proposed as �I well as the existin f a development to the west. Site access is proposed on g f -p �Z c IUELIM. Tuswell Drive. The o II j _yam �nsm°Paai / proposal is to orient the ti `w`R 5yn structure with the entrance facing Tuswell The Community Plan shows the future land use for this site as Neighborhood Office /Institutional. This classification is intended for sites adjacent to residential. The Community Plan emphasizes the importance of extensive landscaping. A density of no more than 9,500 square feet per acre is recommended for sites within this designation. For this site the maximum recommended density is approximately 22,000 fit, square feet. The proposal I is for less density than + recommended in the _ L �< Community Plan at 10,000 square feet. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 7 of 19 Details ng with Preliminary Development Planill Community Plan In 2009, the City identified a need for a long -range vision for the Avery A very Road Road Corridor. The plan+ Corridor Special identifies a desire to create Area Plan unified streetscape indicative Dublin's tradition of a high - quality cohesive character. The plan also depicts conceptual layouts of the potential for future �O development along the corridor. The proposal is 1 generally consistent with the vision of the special area plan. Use The development text permits office or daycare use at a maximum size of 10,000 square feet, which is a 2,500- square -foot increase of the previous development text. Density/ The preliminary development plan is for a 10,000- square -foot daycare Compatibility facility on a 2.33 acre site resulting in a net density of approximately 4,300 square feet per acre. The proposal is significantly less density than the Community Plan recommends although it is 2,500 square feet more than the existing zoning permits. Given the distance from neighboring residential development and the consistency with the recommendation of the Community Plan Planning finds the proposal appropriate for the site. Development No changes are proposed to the development standards, which are as Standards follows: Development Standards Avery Road Building 30 feet Parking 25 feet Side Yard Building 25 feet Parking 20 feet Rear Yard Building 25 feet Par ing 20 feet Building Height Maximum 35 feet Lot Coverage (Maximum) 60% In the Commission's review of the proposal at their May 18" meeting it was recommended the development text be clarified to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. Staff is in agreement with the recommendation as the style is typical of daycare fences approved elsewhere in Dublin. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 8 of 19 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plarill Traffic and Access Access is proposed off of Tuswell Drive. The applicant will provide pedestrian access from the site to the existing shared -use path on Avery Road. As part of this request the applicant verified that additional trips are not expected with the modification in density due to the minimal increase in size and the same use as previously approved. L Parking Analysis Process The site access location was determined as a part of the agreement that the City entered into with the Stonehenge Company in September 2008. Exhibit A to the agreement is shown with the approximate access location shown. Access to this site is limited to the western portion of the site and would not be permitted on Avery Road due to high traffic volumes, the existing median which restricts turning movements, and the higher speed limit. Due to the site's proximity to the roundabout the access point is required to be located as far from the functional �f Pl R intersection as . h � � , x possible. This _a N access point is also located such that any additional accessr� for the undeveloped parcel to the _ south could be aligned with this Li z, L ��_i access point. The proposed development text permits the site to be parked at the office parking requirement of 1 space per 250 square feet, or 40 spaces for a 10,000- square -foot building. While the Code requires daycares to provide parking based on staffing levels and enrollment, several facilities within Dublin have varied from that requirement. ezoning witn FreffillIllIllErry Development a PI Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning /preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 9 of 19 Analysis Rezoning with Preliminary Development a" 1) Consistency Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and with Dublin applicable development standards of the Zoning Code requirements except Zoning Code as altered in the proposed development text. The proposed use, intensity and development standards are similar to recently approved commercial developments. 2) Conformance Criterion met: The proposal is consistent with the Community Plan with adopted recommendations, and is well below the density prescribed in the Plan Plans 3) Advancement Criterion met: This proposal is compatible and consistent with the of general surrounding neighborhoods and will not impede the normal and orderly welfare and development and improvement of the surrounding areas. The proposal will orderly also aid in the consolidation and appropriate zoning of ancillary land no development longer needed for infrastructure. F4) Effects on Criterion met: The development is appropriately located within the City adjacent uses and is compatible with existing development. The landscaping proposed, particularly around the playground meets the Code. 5) Adequacy of Criterion not applicable. open space for residential development 6) Protection of Criterion met: The proposal requires some tree removal and meets Code natural features for replacements. and resources J 7) Adequate Criterion met: The proposal includes adequate and necessary utilities, infrastructure access, and retention facilities to serve the proposed development and not adversely affect the functionality or provision of utilities outside of the site. 8) Traffic and Criterion met: The applicant has worked with Engineering to locate the pedestrian access point appropriately spaced from the Tuswell roundabout. Pedestrian L safety I connection to the public way is provided. 9) Coordination & integration of building & site relationships 10) Development layout and intensity 11) Stormwater management Criterion met: The proposed development sites the building, parking and playground area appropriately on the site. Al I l Criterion met: This proposal meets the criterion for ensuring that the plan Jis overall acceptable and will not hinder the orderly development of land within the city. ICriterion met: Adequate provision is made for stormwater management, storm drainage within and through the site. Analysis - 12) Community benefit 13) Design and appearance Condition 1 14) Development phasing 15) Adequacy of public service 16) Infrastructure contributions City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 10 of 19 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plaml Criterion met: The proposal will provide a consolidation of ancillary land and provide for additional daycare option. The design and site arrangement of the proposal is consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations. Criterion met with condition: The proposed architectural requirements meet or exceed the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area. The development text should be updated to require a wrought -iron style decorative fence. Criterion met: The development will be a single phase. Criterion met: There are adequate services proposed for the development. No additional public improvements will be required. Criterion met: No contributions to infrastructure is required as part of this proposal. Recommendatio oning Approval In Planning's analysis, this pror development plan criteria and tt area. Approval is recommended. Condition decorative fence. text with Preliminary Development Plan Dsal complies with the rezoning /preliminary e existing development standards within the e updated to require a wrought -iron style Detai s coal Development Plan Proposal � 1 The final development plan should conform with and provide a detailed refinement of the approved preliminary development plan. The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The final development plan was submitted concurrently with the rezoning and preliminary development plan details as the proposal is for a single _jI development largely in line with the previous zoning. Proposal The proposal is for a 10,000- square -foot daycare with associated site improvements including a 40 -space parking lot, three fenced play areas with play structures, dumpster enclosure, sidewalk to the public right -of- way, and additional landscaping. A retention basin is located on the western portion of the site and provides stormwater management for the proposed development as well as the existing development to the west. Site access is MENJI provided on Tuswell Drive. The proposed building is oriented toward City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 11 of 19 Detail NEF Development Development Text The proposed Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD allows daycare use as a use. The development text includes building and parking setbacks based on streets within the planned district. The text also provides character standards for the daycare center, signs, landscaping, fencing, and playground. Details not covered in the text including parking, lighting, tree replacement, and screening are all required to conform to the Zoning Code requirements. Use /Density The proposal is to construct a daycare facility, which is a use consistent with the original zoning from 1997. As part of this application, the rezoning and preliminary development plan request an increase in density of the use from the 7,500 square feet originally permitted to 10,000 square feet. As proposed, the proposed final development plan is consistent with the standard. Operational Details The site can accommodate 29 employees and 182 children, which will be between the ages of 6 weeks to school age. Hours of operation are 6:OOam to 6:30pm. Setbacks /Lot The required setback from Avery Road is 25 feet for pavement and 30 feet Coverage for buildings. A side yard setback along the northern and southern property (TuswelI Drive) lines is 10 feet for pavement and 25 feet for buildings. The proposed building, play structures, parking lot, and sidewalks are located within the applicable setbacks. The applicant is proposing a preschool garden area along the north side of the building as part of the resubmitted plans. The area is fenced in and the fence is located in the building setback. Code requires permanent structures, including fence, to be constructed in the buildable area of the lot. The fence location should be modified to meet the Code required setback. Maximum permitted lot coverage is 60% the site. With the proposed development the total lot coverage is proposed at 33 %, which meets the Parking This daycare use requires 60 parking spaces based on the Zoning Code requirement of one space per employee and one space for every six children. The applicant has stated that the daycare will only require a maximum of 40 parking spaces based on their program needs (one parking space per 250 square feet of area, which is consistent with the City's office parking requirement) and is what is proposed in the development text. The Planning and Zoning Commission has previously approved reduced parking requirements or parking deferrals for other daycare centers including the Gardner School (38 spaces provided, 52 required) on Emerald Parkway, the Primrose Daycare (43 spaces provided, 54 required) on Post Road, and the Learning Experience Daycare (36 spaces provided, 46 required) on Perimeter Loop Drive. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 12 of 19 Details MI Development Vehicular/ — Pedestrian Access Tree Pre:ervation, Removal, Replacement/ Landscaping A single driveway is proposed off of Tuswell Drive. No access is warranted or proposed along Avery Road. The parking lot aisles are 22 feet wide to allow two -way circulation. Wheel stops are required to be provided for the parking spaces located adjacent to the walkway in front of the building. The applicant has updated the proposal to provide the required wheel stops for parking spaces adjacent to the building walkway. A five -foot sidewalk is proposed to surround the building and extend to an existing eight -foot shared use path within the Avery Road right -of -way. A four -foot sidewalk is located along Tuswell Drive meeting the development text requirement for connectivitv alona the public riaht- of -way. A total of 12 trees or 78 inches are proposed to be removed with development of the site. Per Code, inch for inch replacement is required for 32 replacement trees which will be replaced on site. Replacement trees will be located around the pond and along the Tuswell Drive frontage. The tree row along the northern property line will be preserved with some understory vegetation removal to provide for access around the building. Tree protection fencing is required to be placed prior to construction and maintained throughout development by the contractors, which is reflected in the proposed plan. The landscape plans meet the requirement for interior landscaping and deciduous trees within the parking lot. Two light poles are located within the parking lot islands but these will be placed at least 10 feet from the trees as required by Code. Deciduous trees are located every 40 feet around the parking lot. The parking lot is adequately screened with an evergreen hedge. The applicant has updated the landscape proposal to provide additional hedge along the entry drive to the right -of -way to help further buffer views into the parking lot. Existing street trees along Tuswell Drive and within the roundabout will be preserved. Three new Linden trees will added to the line of street trees along Tuswell Drive, west of the entry. Street trees cannot be placed within the tree lawn along Avery Road due to the combination of low overhead lines and signs for the roundabout. The applicant is showing trees on the west side of the existing path adjacent to Avery Road to match the other side and to enhance the streetscape, which is an acceptable location. Three sections of a low rubble wall are located adjacent to Avery Road and complemented by landscaping. The wall design matches the style of walls adjacent to the roundabout. The development sign is proposed in front of the rubble wall southeast of the roundabout at the Villas at Glenaly neighborhood. The applicant has extended the northern rubble wall farther toward the north property line to provide a greater sense of enclosure alona the Avery Road frontage. Based on the Commission's feedback staff City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 13 of 19 Details NFinal Development Plan recommends the wall design be revised to stacked limestone wall with book -end design typically characteristic throughout Dublin. The walls are located outside of the right -of -way. The landscape plan shows screening around the playground fence. The applicant has substituted lilac shrubs for some of the bayberry to improve diversity per Staff's request. An aerator is proposed within the pond to help circulate the water, improve water quality, and add a visual amenity to the site. A starburst fountain is typically used within ponds in Dublin though the application does not specify a type. One will need to be identified on the building permit submittal. The transformer is shown on the east side of the building and screened with evergreen shrubs as required. Additionally, a gas meter shown on the east side of the building. The applicant has provided foundation plantings along east fagade of the structure on Avery Road to soften the appearance. HVAC units and other mechanicals are not shown on this proposal and screening will need to meet all Code requirements and be verified at building permitting. Staff recommends all mechanicals be painted to match the structure. The development text provides design standards for the daycare. The applicant has proposed modifications to the design standards included in this application with the rezoning to permit materials consistent with existing daycare facilities in Dublin. The proposed facility is a traditional, single -story building. The building will be clad primarily with a limestone veneer (Dutch Quality Stone, Ohio White Vein Limestone) and stucco finish (SW 7588, Medici Ivory). Additional details are proposed to enhance the character of the architecture including a cast stone watertable (Rockcast, Savanah), brick soldier course above windows and doors (Redland, Allegheny Handcraft), half round dormers (standing seam with copper patina), and dimensional asphalt shingles (Oakridge, Estate Gray). The proposed windows and doors are residential in scale and character. Decorative wood louvers are proposed on the gable ends in keeping with the building's character. The louvers, wood window trim, and wood siding within the dormers will all be painted a cream color (SW 2833, Roycroft Vellum). All mechanical units are not shown on the plans, but if located on the roof will need to be fully screened by the pitched roof parapet. In response to the Commission's discussion regarding a need for additional architectural prominence along Avery Road the applicant has revised the elevation to provide a faux double door entrance and a decorative mechanical room door. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 14 of 19 City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 15 of 19 Analysis I Development Plars Process Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for an amended final development plan. Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1) Consistency with the approved preliminary development plan Conditions 2 & 3 F 2) Traffic and pedestrian safety 3) Adequate public services and open space 4) Protection of natural features and resources 5) Adequacy of lighting 5) Sigma nt with preliminary development plan Condition 5 Criterion met with Conditions: This proposal is consistent with the requirements of the preliminary development plan. However, there are discrepancies on the proposed fence height between the plans and the fence details. While the maximum height shown does not exceed the permitted height in the text, the plans and details must be reconciled prior to permitting. Criterion met: The proposal generally provides pedestrian circulation and meets the Code requirements. safe vehicular and Criterion met: As an existing site proposed for redevelopment, the site has adequate public services. No open space dedication is required. Criterion met: The applicant has included tree protection fencing for the existing landscaping. requirements. Criterion met with Condition: The applicant will be required to demonstrate conformance to the Code requirements for sign design, location and construction prior to sign permitting as the proposal with this application does not meet the applicable requirements. 7) Appropriate Criterion met with Condition: The plan contorms to Code requirements landscaping to for vehicular use area requirements and use specific standards for daycares. enhance, The applicant will be required to screen all mechanicals, and should paint the buffer, & soften mechanicals to match the structure. Additionally, a decorative stone the building and landscape wall is proposed and should be of design consistent with walls site found elsewhere in Dublin. Conditions 1 & 4 City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 16 of 19 Analysis al Development Pla 8) Compliant Criterion met: The existing basin appears to provide adequate stormwate Stormwater management for this site. Compliance with the City's storm water management management Code will need to be demonstrated at building permitting. 9) All phases Not App /icab /e. comply with the previous riteria J 10) Compliance with other laws & regulations Criterion met: The proposal appears to comply with all other known applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Recommendati Approval In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteria and the existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this request with conditions. Conditions 1) That the landscape wall design along Avery Road be revised to a stacked limestone wall design to be verified at Building Permitting; 2) That the fence location be updated along north elevation to comply with the development standards, and be located in the buildable area of the lot; 3) That the proposed fencing detail be updated to confirm the fence will be of a wrought -iron style; 4) That all mechanicals be painted to match the structure; and, 5) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sin permitting. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 17 of 19 REZONING/ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves/ denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 18 of 19 circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(6) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in §153.053(E)(4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 031Z /PDP /FDPI Kendall Ridge Daycare PUD — Kiddie Academy Thursday, June 22, 2017 1 Page 19 of 19 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site feeding into regional stormwater basin which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10)The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. 0 Q! ■ w a IREL—AN ■P ■L E M W pY SWELL D� / /�� FO R , Z Q' V n RIDGE L'OOQ - EAGHAN1DR nn AN- S_HERR, IiAV�E C _ •WAY ro PM D����� �� ■r�� yRINGSL KE 17- 031PDP /Z /FDP Preliminary Development Plan/ Rezoning/ 0 150 300 Final Development Plan Kiddie Academy Feet 6055 Avery Road RECORD OF ACTION cry of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, May 18, 20171 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos PUD, Kiddie Academy 6055 Avery Road 17- 031Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary and Final Development Plans Proposal: A rezoning of a 2.33 -acre site from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos), R -1 Restricted Suburban Residential District, and R -1B, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Daycare) to permit a 10,000- square -foot daycare center and associated site improvements. The site is northwest of the intersection of Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Planned District rezoning under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and approval of Preliminary and Final Development Plans under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Andrew Gardner, Bird +Bull Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION: Mr. Brown motioned, Ms. Mitchell seconded, to table the Rezoning /Preliminary and Final Development Plan Reviews. VOTE: 7 — 0 RESULT: The Rezoning /Preliminary and Final Development Plan Reviews were tabled. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes F] r_1y;K*l4:ir0(d_Nr to] 0 Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 14 n AN :1;1114 111611111111111 ;111 X, IRWIN 1111111 1 1:2111A 11411111 1:1 2. Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos PUD, Kiddie Academy 6055 Avery Road 17-031Z/PDP/FDP Rezoning/Preliminary and Final Development Plans The Chair, Victoria Newell, said the following application is for a rezoning of a 2.33 -acre site from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Offices and Condos), R -1 Restricted Suburban Residential District, and R -113, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township) to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Kendall Ridge Daycare) to permit a 10,000- square -foot daycare center and associated site improvements. She said the site is northwest of the intersection of Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. She said this is a request for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Planned District rezoning under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and approval of Preliminary and Final Development Plans she said under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. The Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission in regard to this case. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 14 Nichole Martin presented an aerial view of the site that includes three parcels as well as a vacated City of Dublin right -of -way. She noted that parcels to the south are remnants from the construction of the roundabout at Avery Road and Tuswell Drive. As part of an Ordinance 67 -06, she reported the City agreed to vacate the right -of -way just north of those parcels and combined the parcels as well as the vacated right -of -way with the 1.63 acres to the north that is currently zoned as part of the Kendall Ridge Office and Condominium Planned Unit Development; therefore, the total site area is 2.33 acres. As part of the rezoning application, she said Planning reviews the application against the Community Plan and Future Land Use recommendations. She said the daycare use is consistent with the neighborhood Office and Institutional recommendation for density as found in the Community Plan. She explained that rezoning is required for an existing PUD when either general development standards for a geographic area or use and density are unable to be met. She said in this instance, the rezoning portion and Preliminary Development Plan portion is required to incorporate the additional area into a new Planned District as well as permit a density of a 10,000- square -foot daycare facility located on the 2.33 acres. Ms. Martin said the Final Development Plan portion of this request is as follows: • 10,000- square -foot daycare; • 40 -space parking lot; • Three fenced play areas with play structures; • Dumpster enclosure; • Sidewalk to the public right -of -way; • Sign; and • Additional landscaping. Ms. Martin added a retention basin located on the western portion of the site provides stormwater management for the proposed development as well as the existing development to the west. She said the structure is oriented with the entrance facing Tuswell Drive as that is the proposed site access. Ms. Martin said the proposed development text permits the site to be parked at the office parking requirement of 1 space per 250 square feet, or 40 spaces for a 10,000- square -foot building. While the Code requires daycares to provide parking based on staffing levels and enrollment, she reported that several facilities within Dublin have varied from that requirement. Ms. Martin noted the landscape plans meet the requirement for interior parking lot landscaping and deciduous tree replacement. She said two light poles are located within the parking lot islands but these will be placed at least 10 feet from the trees as required by Code. She said deciduous trees are located every 40 feet around the parking lot; the parking lot is adequately screened with an evergreen hedge. Ms. Martin said three sections of a low rubble wall are located adjacent to Avery Road and are complemented by landscaping and the wall design matches the walls around the roundabout. The development sign is proposed in front of the rubble wall near the roundabout, she said, and the walls are located outside of the right -of -way but the sign as proposed exceeds requirements and the applicant will need to reduce the size of the sign. Ms. Martin said the landscape plan shows screening around the playground fence. A deciduous Bayberry hedge and Maple trees will be added, she said, to help buffer the use from adjacent properties. She affirmed that Staff will work with the applicant to substitute Lilac shrubs for some of the Bayberry to improve diversity. Ms. Martin noted an aerator is proposed within the pond to help circulate the water, improve water quality, and add a visual amenity to the site. She indicated a starburst fountain is typically used within ponds in Dublin though the application does not specify a type; one will need to be identified on the building permit submittal. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 14 Ms. Martin presented the proposed elevations along Tuswell Drive as well as the northern entrance adjacent to an undeveloped site to the north that includes architectural details for this traditional, single - story building to be clad primarily with a limestone veneer and an ivory Stucco finish. Ms. Martin presented the Avery Road elevation and reported staff has requested that additional architectural detail be provided to have a more substantial and prominent presence along the public right -of -way to be consistent with other developments in Dublin. She indicated that Planning recommends the gas meter be screened and additional foundation plantings are provided along the east fagade of the structure to soften the appearance along Avery Road. Ms. Martin presented the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan criteria for which the applicant has met, therefore, staff recommends approval to City Council with no conditions. She said the Final Development Plan criteria have all been met with six conditions as follows: 1) That the plans and details be reconciled as to the proposed height of the playground fence, prior to submitting for a building permit; 2) That the applicant provide additional architectural detail to add prominence to the east elevation; subject to staff approval; 3) That the applicant provide wheel stops for the parking spaces located adjacent to the walkway in front of the building; 4) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting; 5) That the proposed fencing on the south and east sides of the building be eliminated to minimize landscape maintenance conflicts and to soften the appearance of the structure along Avery Road, unless daycare licensing requirements interfere with this request; and 6) That the applicant continue to work with staff, and be subject to staff approval prior to building permitting for the following items: a. Substitute Lilac shrubs for Bayberry in select locations; b. Select an aerator for the stormwater management basin; c. Provide foundation plantings and gas meter screening along the east elevation; and d. Extend the hedge and trees along the entry drive to the right -of -way to help buffer views into the parking lot. Chris Brown inquired about the placement of the entry drive. Ms. Martin explained location was determined based on the design of the roundabout at Avery Road, 200 feet east of the intersection with Tuswell Drive. Mr. Stidhem asked how close the entry drive was to the neighbor's drive on the other side of the street. Mr. Brown said his concern was when one is headed out in the morning, the car lights could potentially shine right into the neighbor's house. Ms. Martin indicated the house was oriented toward Kendall Ridge Loop. Amy Salay inquired about the rubble wall. Ms. Martin said the intent is to match the character of the stone walls existing adjacent to the roundabout and that the applicant used the term "rubble wall" on their plans. Claudia Husak clarified that the stone is not stacked in mortar, but rather more loosely placed. Ms. Salay asked if that type of wall has durability over time. Ms. Husak said there are some of these walls in Ballantrae and a few stones have fallen. Ms. Salay said she would rather see a stacked wall with stones in place; the walls at Ballantrae are supposed to look like ruins. Ms. Husak said the design is existing in the vicinity so that is why staff thought it was appropriate. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 14 Victoria Newell pointed out that there are a lot of dry- stacked stone walls in Dublin. She said if the walls are properly installed, they will stay that way for a long period of time before requiring maintenance. Mr. Stidhem said there is a driveway that comes up Tuswell Drive and asked how close the entry/exit is to that person's driveway. Ms. Martin said she did not know the exact distance. Cathy De Rosa inquired about the fencing. She said the applicant is requesting to have fencing all around the property. She said she also wanted to know staff's reasons for recommending to limit that. She noted the big retention pond behind the proposed building and wondered what type of fencing is required or prudent for that. Ms. Martin indicated the applicant would be better suited to speak to the daycare needs with respect to the fence. She said generally, other daycares in Dublin that have been approved, have fencing only around the play areas and most of them have been approved for fences that are four feet in height with wrought iron character. She pointed out that the development text of the Kendall Ridge Office and Condominiums allowed for a five -foot high fence, which the applicant has continued in this proposed development text. She said staff is not supportive of the fence along the Avery Road and Tuswell frontages based on the character; however, the applicant has indicated there are some operational needs and potential state licensing requirements that necessitate a fence. She said the City's experience has been that a fence is not required for all sides of the structure to comply with regulations. Ms. Martin said the original Kendall Ridge Office and Condominiums required the play area for this future daycare to be located in the north and west portion of the site likely to keep a fair amount of distance from Avery and Tuswell Roads. She said the stormwater pond is fairly large so it provides a buffer from the existing residential development to the west. She said an aerator will be installed into the pond to soften any noise. From a safety perspective, she indicated the fence is adequate to prevent children from accessing the stormwater basin. Andrew Gardner, 6628 Burbank Place, Westerville, OH, said he was with Bird + Bull Engineers and Surveyors and the civil engineer for the Stonehenge Company and Kiddie Academy. In general, he said they agree with the staff's recommendations. He noted there is a height discrepancy on the plans with regard to the fence. He said their intention is to have a five -foot fence around the playgrounds and the fencing elsewhere would be four feet in height. He indicated he spoke with Ms. Martin about decreasing the amount of fencing in front of the building to where the doors are to eliminate it in front of the landscape beds. He said they have to have emergency exits from all of the classrooms. He said the main entrance of a daycare is monitored at all times. The other RC exits (albeit alarmed), need to have that fence outside for added security, he said. Ms. De Rosa asked what the requirements are for schools and daycares with a close proximity to water. Ms. Husak said there are no zoning rules that address that. Ms. Newell said some schools have concerns with it and can request a school district to have a fence. Lassaad Driss, 6331 Meaghan Drive, said he has been a resident for 6.5 years with two little kids. He said his greatest concern is the main entrance that almost faces the condominium to the left and the safety of the roundabout as there is almost an accident there every day. He said now he has to worry about people picking up kids after a long day. He said he is an engineer and if the entrance were to be placed in the back, the problem may be solved. He suggested there are more properties available that would be better suited for this daycare; he is worried about his house value. Jamie Schroyer, 6121 Tuswell Drive, said traffic was his main concern. Since the roundabout has been put in, the amount of traffic that goes past his house has doubled. He said when the daycare will have holiday presentations, with all the parents invited, there will be cars all up and down their street and Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 14 Tuswell is a narrow street anyways. He believes there is only supposed to be parking on one side. He said cars go flying through there; his two daughters are not allowed to play out front unless an adult is out there because the traffic is so bad. Rajasekhara Vuyyuru, 6323 Meaghan Drive, said his concern is traffic. The Chair called for more public comment. [Hearing none] She closed the public portion. Mr. Stidhem asked how long this has been planned to be a daycare. Since 2007, Ms. Martin answered. Mr. Stidhem asked if there is a condominium association to which Ms. Martin answered affirmatively. Mr. Stidhem asked if the developer had made any contact with the Homeowner's Association. Ms. Martin said staff always encourages developers to reach out to the HOAs, but that she is not aware of contact with the residents. Ms. Salay asked the developer if they had any meetings with the Kendall Association. Mr. Andrews said his representative from Stonehenge was not present and could not answer that question accurately but to his knowledge there were no meetings with the association. He said he did not know that was expected with the zoning process. He said the location of the entrances were dictated by the City Engineers as the entrances had to be a certain distance from the roundabout. He said the drives are not really aligned. He said the information that this could be developed into a daycare has been available as long as that development has been there. He indicated he appreciated the comments from the residents. Ms. Husak said the Ordinance regarding the right -of -way vacate for old Tuswell showed the access point for this parcel and was approved by Council in 2007. The access for the parcel to the south, if it ever were to develop, has also been approved; the City owns that portion as part of the realignment for the roundabout. Ms. Newell added that this property is already zoned for a daycare facility. Ms. Newell said she has some questions about the Final Development Plan. She asked that the wrought iron fencing be clarified in the text, which would require an additional condition. She said she cannot recall a single daycare facility that has the whole perimeter fenced in. She said she understands the philosophy that if you really want to contain the children but we have never allowed that. In terms of the current text, she said permitted fencing at the height of five feet when our limitations are normally four feet in height. She said the Commission has made exceptions in the past for daycare facilities. She indicated that if adult daycare facilities requested the same five -foot fence she could not support it. She noted that in the past, the Commission has requested that the applicants break up the fencing with brick or masonry pier. Ms. Husak said staff had a condition requiring the applicant to clarify where five -foot fencing was proposed and where four -foot fencing was proposed because there were some discrepancies on the plans. Mr. Gardner said their intention after hearing the concerns on the fence is to go back and discuss with staff ways they can reduce the amount of fencing across the front and side. He said they would like to have fencing across the doorway areas with a gate. He said their intention is for the five -foot fencing to be placed around the play areas, the dividers internal to the play areas will be four foot, and any fencing remaining around the buildings would all be four feet in height. Ms. Salay said she agreed with Ms. Newell about the perimeter fencing. She indicated she understands the applicant wanting to contain the children but that is a management issue that should be handled internally and to not rely on an external fence. She said she could not support any fence other than the one proposed for the west side to fence in the play area. She said breaking the fence up with stone pillars or landscaping would be needed. She said her concern about fencing across a door hinders emergency exits. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 14 Mr. Gardner offered to sketch what he is suggesting for the front. He said along the back of the building there are a lot of egress doors and that is where the older children are (5 — 6 year olds /school age children) and would like to keep that fencing along the north elevation. Ms. Salay asked the applicant about details of the fencing. Ms. Newell asked if the proposed fencing had been approved by Building Standards or the Fire Marshall. Mr. Gardner said that still needs to be worked out. Ms. Salay indicated the proposal is not ready for a Final Development Plan approval. Ms. Newell recalled that the Building Official and the Fire Inspector were not supportive of the fencing. Ms. Husak reported she and Nichole Martin conducted a lot of research on other daycare centers in the area and found there are no daycares in Dublin that are completely fenced in as this one is proposed. Most of them, she said, have at least the frontage open for their main entrance. She recalled that Learning Experience that received approval for six -foot fencing and masonry columns around the playground area because it was located at the rear of the site and does not have fencing on frontage but it has fencing on all other sides as does Primrose, Goddard, and Gardner. Ms. Martin clarified that Primrose has play structures on three sides of the building so that is why they have fencing on three sides. She added that generally, daycares that have play equipment in one area will just have that area fenced in; The Learning Experience does not fit that model. They were also granted a six -foot fence with columns in between and a four foot fence along the two other sides but not along the front elevation. She said staff also compared the floor plans operationally and found the daycares are very similar to each other. Chris Commarota, Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, 3415 Box Hill Corporate Center Drive, Abingdon, Maryland 21009, said they are different than the franchises mentioned. He explained they have an open design on the inside of the building and they provide two means of egress because of their design. He said the means of egress to the outside shortens the length of the exit path that the children have to use. He said the two means of egress also require them to conduct fire drills once a month. He explained that the staff member in front and the staff member in back take the children to the area of refuge, which is located likely in the playground area. He said the fence is to help coral the children and guide them to where they need to go. He explained that the purpose of the five foot fence is much more difficult for someone to reach over and grab a child. He indicated there are instances where parents have issues with each other and it is almost impossible for a parent to reach over. Chris Brown asked why a fence is needed over the infant area. Mr. Commarota said they could sacrifice that. He said they like it on every doorway to promote the safety environment. He said they could compromise on the toddler area but the corridor on the east side is a challenge for them and they were hoping that landscaping would help to reduce the impact on the look of the building. Ms. Newell inquired about the egress doors out of each classroom and confirmed that all the rooms on the front are toddler and infant occupied and the rooms across the back of the building have older children. She asked what the difference was for the treatment of the fence for the front versus the back. Mr. Commarota answered the infants will be coming out four in a crib and will be wheeled out so they are not a challenge; the children in the toddler room will come out in a buggy and under the control of a staff member; the children in the back (older toddlers) they will be walking with staff. Ms. Newell said her concern is because the children are contained in that fence area and this has not been typically approved. She said her understanding is when you have a fence on the perimeter of that structure you are detaining someone from egressing the building and the travel distance needs to be Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 14 calculated from inside of the building and all along the fence area until they are reaching the designated area. She said before she could approve the fence, she would want to know the travel distance. Mr. Commarota said they have 186 locations around the country including one that is opening on Monday and those locations have a fence around the building and some of them are larger buildings and all meet that requirement for the length of travel. Ms. De Rosa agreed that the Commission needs to understand this a little bit more. She indicated the back fence from a water perspective made a lot of sense to her. She questioned what could or should be done around the retention pond. Mr. Commarota said they have locations in Florida and New Jersey that have much larger retention ponds and staff is trained well to manage that. He said children are not allowed outside of that fenced in area. Ms. Salay indicated there is additional work that needs to be done and is not comfortable voting on this. She said her concerns are the height of the fence, a revised sign, and a perimeter fence that will take away from the building and would like to see some nice perimeter landscaping on the eastern and southern elevations. She said for the fence along the back, she is interested in the Building Code issue and the distance of travel for egress. She reiterated that there are no other daycares that have a perimeter fence. She said before voting she would like to see the architectural details, fence plans modified, landscape plans modified, and see a landscape wall that is more in keeping with what we have in the roundabout. Mr. Gardner offered to sacrifice the fencing along the southern and eastern facades and asked if the Commission would be supportive maintaining a fence along the north then. Bob Miller said he would be in favor of that but it would need to be added as a condition depending on the validation of this travel distance issue. Mr. Gardner said that is something they could show during the building permit stage and address the fire code issues to present to staff. Mr. Miller said he supports Ms. Salay's perspective that the east elevation detail is valuable in reviewing this application. In regard to the elevation, Mr. Gardner said they revised it once by adding a gable feature over the doors on the east and west sides. He asked what the Commission is looking for specifically on that elevation to give it additional prominence. He said a double door was mentioned but he is not sure that would work with the hallway width. The Chair requested to see the staff conditions again. Ms. Martin presented the original six conditions as well as a draft of the seventh condition per Ms. Newell. 1) That the plans and details be reconciled as to the proposed height of the playground fence, prior to submitting for a building permit; 2) That the applicant provide additional architectural detail to add prominence to the east elevation; subject to staff approval; 3) That the applicant provide wheel stops for the parking spaces located adjacent to the walkway in front of the building; 4) That the sign be revised to meet all Code requirements to be verified at sign permitting; 5) That the proposed fencing on the south and east sides of the building be eliminated to minimize landscape maintenance conflicts and to soften the appearance of the structure along Avery Road, unless daycare licensing requirements interfere with this request; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 14 6) That the applicant continue to work with staff, and be subject to staff approval prior to building permitting for the following items: a. Substitute lilac shrubs for bayberry in select locations; b. Select an aerator for the stormwater management basin; c. Provide foundation plantings, and gas meter screening along the east elevation; d. Extend the hedge and trees along the entry drive to the right -of -way to help buffer views into the parking lot; and 7) That the development text be updated to reflect a metal wrought iron style fence be required. Mr. Stidhem asked for the justification for increasing the 7,500 square feet to 10,000 square feet. Ms. Martin answered from a staff perspective, the request meets the future land use recommendation and Community Plan for density. Ms. Husak said any daycares the City has approved in the last 14 years have been 10,000 square feet. Mr. Commarota said their average size building is around 10,000 square feet, their largest is 16,000 square feet, and the oldest is smaller at the 7,500- square -foot range. He said the 10,000- square -foot centers came about 15 years ago. Ms. Salay asked if there is a limit as to how many children are permitted based on square footage. She asked if they have a plan for 182 children maximum here for 10,000 square feet of space to which the applicant agreed. She asked if the square footage was reduced to 7,500 square feet, how many children would they be permitted. Mr. Commarota answered it would reduce the capacity but does not know the exact number. He said that business model may not work for the developer or the franchisee. Deborah Mitchell said she agrees with her fellow Commissioners about the perimeter fencing and finds the applicant's willingness to reduce fencing is a positive step in the right direction. The Chair asked the applicant what he would like to do this evening. Mr. Gardner said they formally request to table the Final Development Plan but could get a vote on rezoning. Ms. Husak said since the rezoning has included the five -foot fence height in certain geographical locations, and the applicant is not currently in agreement with those, it may be beneficial to table both. Mr. Brown suggested the fence on the north side be kept at four feet and five feet around the play area to discourage abduction from disenfranchised parents. Ms. Newell said she agreed with the five -foot elevation. Mr. Brown requested a rendering of the elevation with the stacked wall that shows more prominence and gravity so it reads well from the street such as with landscaping and the elimination of the fence on the east and south side. Ms. Mitchell agreed and said she does not have an issue with the 10,000 square feet and the business model with this proposal. Mr. Stidhem highly recommended that the applicant talk with the Condominium Associations to gain their feedback before going on with next steps. He said a proposal is always more powerful when the applicant comes before the Commission with the support of the Condominium Associations and no objections. Mr. Gardner requested to table both the Rezoning and the Preliminary and Final Development Plan Reviews. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 14 Motion and Vote Mr. Brown moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded to table the Rezoning, and Preliminary and Final Development Plan Reviews. The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; and Mr. Brown, yes. (Tabled 7 — 0) . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . -- --- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - ---- -- - -- . -- -- ---- .. -- - -- -- -- - -- .. -- -- . - - . . - - . - . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . -- - - -- -- -- -- - - nom -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- -- -- - - -- - Will DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION February 3, 2000 4111 orutMAN Division of naming 5800 shm, Rings Rood Dublin, Ohio 430161236 Phw/IOD: 674- 7614550 Fax: 614- 7614566 W6 So.. wwAhlin.okus The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Final Development Plan 99- 118FDP - Kendall Ridge Condominiums Location: 8.165 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 feet north of Dan - Sherri Avenue. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Trees Plan). Request: Review and approval of a final development plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.056. Proposed Use: Eleven two - family condominium buildings and a 7,500- square -foot office building. Applicant: The Stonehenge Company, c/o Doug Tailford, 6253 Riverside Drive, Suite 200, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this final development plan because it conforms to the preliminary development plan and will provide an attractive gateway to the neighborhood to the west, with 14 conditions: 1) That rightof -way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at Page I of 2 the time of rezoning; 2) That the left turn lane widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That the rear elevations be revised to include a similar amount of brick or stone as the other elevations, consistent with the text; 4) That the west elevation of the office building be revised to have the same level of quality in architecture and materials as the east elevation; 5) That fencing be limited to the type and locations shown on the submitted plans, unless otherwise revised by the Commission; 6) That the landscape plan be revised to include tree preservation and replacement, to replace the proposed shrubbery within Reserve B with deciduous trees, and to conform to Code and the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; Page I of 2 �— DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION February 3, 2000 2. Final Development Plan 99- 118FDP - Kendall Ridge Condominiums (Continued) 7) That the slope within Reserve B be limited to a maximum of five percent; 8) That payment in lieu of land dedication (approximately $51,750) be provided to meet the park and open space requirement prior to issuance of building permits; 9) That the design of all public roads and utilities meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 10) That the vehicle backing area nearest the office entrance be eliminated; 11) That the final plat and the engineering drawings be reconciled with respect to lot tines; 12) That a staking plan showing conformance to the minimum setback requirements be submitted; 13) That the office site lighting plan be revised to show the correct site layout and meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; and 14) That revised plans be submitted within two weeks and prior to scheduling the building permit pre - submittal meeting. lop, • Mo Dioun, Stonehedge Company, and Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions. i+ w VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This final development plan was approved. Page 2 of 2 STAFF CERTIFICATION J6hn Talentim Planner Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — February 3, 2000 Page 8 Road, and om building was permitwd tg limitcd to two 3,cars op*. �ta�/S•ETSf�STI.IJ- S.LTI. 1RT}Ill.T.1fS:1SV.T.9J 2. Final Development Plan 99- 118FDP - Kendall Ridge Condominiums John Talentino presented this final development plan. [There was a tape recording malfunction during the staff and applicant presentations on this case. The recording is intact for most of the questions to the applicant. The nest few paragraphs have been recreated from staff notes.] Mr. Talentino said this site contains 8.2 acres on the west side of Avery Road and is zoned PUD. The proposal is a condominium development of 22 units. The plan includes 11 two - family dwellings. There is also a 7,500 square foot office building along the frontage. There is a detention area set aside between the office and condo areas. He showed several slides of the site and adjacent area. He said the entry road is called Tuswell Drive. The condo buildings are laid out around a 0.5 acre open space "reserve ". The southern side of it includes Kendall Ridge Drive. The plan for the reserve shows it being steeply mounded. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — February 3, 2000 Page 9 Mr. Talentino said the plan conforms to the Thoroughfare Plan and the recent MS Consultants' study. The park requirement is being met by a monetary contribution, rather than a land dedication, for this site. Mr. Talentino described the proposed buildings and architecture. He said staff recommends approval with 13 conditions: 1) That right -of -way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at the time of rezoning; 2) That the left turn lane be widened on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That the rear elevations be revised to include a similar amount of brick or stone as the other elevations, consistent with the text; 4) That the west elevation of the office building be revised to have the same level of quality in architecture and materials as the east elevation; 5) That fencing be limited to the type and locations shown on the submitted plans, unless otherwise revised by the Commission; 6) That the landscape plan be revised to include tree preservation and replacement and to conform to Code and the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; 7) That payment in lieu of land (approximately $51,750) be provided to meet the park r^� and open space requirement prior to issuance of building permits; 8) That the design of all public roads and utilities meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 9) That the vehicle backing area nearest the office entrance be eliminated; 10) That the final plat and the engineering drawings be reconciled with respect to lot lines; 11) That a staking plan showing conformance to the minimum setback requirements be submitted; 12) That the plan be revised to show the correct site layout and meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; and 13) That revised plans be submitted within two weeks and prior to scheduling the building permit pre - submittal meeting. Mr. Fishman asked about the proposed grading within the reserve. He preferred to see flat open space. Mr. McCash agreed and also emphasized the need to provide adequate drainage. Mr. Eastep recommended a grade of six percent or less with maximum elevation of 929 (feet above sea level). Ben W. Hale, Jr. represented the applicant. He stated the applicant was in agreement with the conditions in the staff report. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — February 3, 2000 Page 10 Mr. Lecklider preferred less mounding and more landscaping within the reserve. Mr. Fishman suggested the applicant work with staff to reduce the mound to a maximum five percent slope, eluninate the bushes within the reserve, and replace them with trees. Mo Dimm, the applicant, said there would be a mixture of bushes and trees around the reserve. He stated that balancing dirt on the site is one consideration for the mound, but that the site is short of dirt overall. The mound will provide more visible green space. Mr. Dioun stated that the homeowners association will maintain the reserve. Mr. Dioun stated the architecture reflects the appearance of single homes. The material palette is varied as requested by the Commission. [Tape resumed.] Mr. Eastep suggested replacing the bushes with deciduous trees and reducing the slope on the mound to five percent. Mr. Lecklider suggested a three to five percent slope; Mr. McCash suggested three to four percent. Mary Newcomb agreed to three to five percent. Mr. Eastep wanted it to be done tastefully with deciduous trees. Mr. Peplow agreed. Mr. Fishman suggested installing a lot of trees. Mr. Hale said the streets were going to be public streets and meet all of the codes. The center island will be maintained by the homeowners' association. Mr. Hale agreed to all the other conditions. Mr. Fishman said all of the buildings are going to be stone or brick except two, and what is not stone or brick, will be Hardi - plank. Mr. Talentino agreed and said nine buildings will have brick or stone and Hardi- plank, and two will be all Hardi- plank. The nine rear elevations are all Hardi - plank, and staff suggests using stone on some prominent elevations, and the applicant agreed. The applicant prefers not to use brick facing the service complex. Staff wants a varied appearance. Mr. Dioun said any elevation seen from the street will be a mix of stone, brick and Hardi- plank, except for two buildings. The buildings that are not visible from the street will have Hardi - plank. The houses in Kendall Ridge are all vinyl siding, and he thought it was unfair to require more expensive materials here than in Kendall Ridge. Mr. Fishman suggested that no two buildings side by side have Hardi -plank rear elevations. He complemented Mr. Dioun on the work he had done. Mr. Dioun said no two buildings in a row will have all Hardi - plank. Mr. Talentino said the text requires the same quality of architecture and materials on all sides. The amount of brick or stone should be the same on all four sides. The other goal is to assure the buildings all appear to be different buildings, and the applicant has done a great job on that. As proposed, all these buildings have the same appearance on the rear. Staff suggests instead of reducing the amount of brick and stone on the other ..r Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — February 3, 2000 Page I1 three sides, that brick or stone be used on the alternating houses, which will still give the look of having different sides. Mr. Talentino said that meets the spirit of the text. Mr. Dioun said they focused on the street scene and what is effectively being seen. He said the buildings are still attractive enough if two of them are [text to each to other. He said their emphasis is on mounding and greenery with trees in the middle area. He agreed to comply with the text and as the Commission defined it. Mr. McCash said those houses whose rear elevations faced the service complex and bus garage were fine with the Hardi -plank as proposed. Mr. Dioun said the Hardi -plank was off - white, and the trim will be a different shade of white. The buildings will have plytrim as the trim material. Mr. Eastep said that is actually a better product for white because there will be no bleeding. Mr. Lecklider recollected that the architecture was one basis for the density. Mr. Fishman agreed that the applicant should comply with the text and follow the staff recommendations. He had confidence Mr. Dioun would comply. Mr. Lecklider agreed and said he felt Mr. Dioun would do a first - quality project. Messrs. Harian, Sprague, and Peplow also agreed. CMr. Eastep said this looked great. He also agreed that more density was given in exchange for architectural appeal, interest, and diversity. He said he would like to see a little break -up on the rear. He suggested perhaps a six -foot water table of brick or stucco stone on a few homes and alternating a couple of the rear gables. Mr. Dioun agreed to work with staff on the rear elevation diversity. Mr. Fishman wanted to see as much stone and brick as the text required. He said a water table did not appeal to him because they get covered by foundation plantings. Mr. Eastep made a motion to approve this final development plan because it conforms to the preliminary development plan and will provide an attractive gateway to the neighborhood to the west, with 14 conditions: 1) That right-of-way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at the time of rezoning; 2) That the left turn lane widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That the rear elevations be revised to include a similar amount of brick or stone as the other elevations, consistent with the text; 4) That the west elevation of the office building be revised to have the same level of quality in architecture and materials as the east elevation; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — February 3, 2000 Page 12 �. 5) That fencing be limited to the type and locations shown on the submitted plans, unless otherwise revised by the Commission; 6) That the landscape plan be revised to include tree preservation and replacement, to replace the proposed shrubbery within Reserve B with deciduous trees, and to conform to Code and the comments contained within the staff report, subject to staff approval; 7) That the slope within Reserve B be limited to a maximum of five percent; 8) That payment in lieu of land dedication (approximately $51,750) be provided to meet the park and open space requirement prior to issuance of building permits; 9) That the design of all public roads and utilities meet the requirements of the City Engineer; 10) Tbat the vehicle backing area nearest the office entrance be eliminated; ll)Tbat the final plat and the engineering drawings be reconciled with respect to lot lines; 12)That a staking plan showing conformance to the minimum setback requirements be submitted; 13) That the plan be revised to show the correct site layout and meet the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; and 14) That revised plans be submitted within two weeks and prior to scheduling the building permit pre- submittal meeting. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. +✓ Harian, yes; and Mr. Eastep, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minor, of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting II Held October4,1999 _ _ _.. II Plan for its top award in the eateger) at. "Gempuelnusive Planning for a Small SUff,vill accept this n ... nd on Dublin's behalf ga an Teeming meeting in C 'l ad. POSTPONED UEM Resolution 47 99(Ameaded) A Resolution a Traffic Calming Policy for the -Citj of ^Dubl W Um�].y stauxi dust the meadej'OFSinit HaNOWPOKKOS the changes that were discussed 9 the last Couned meeting P ir. Admek, yes; Mayer Knoistuber, yes; Mr. Rein", yes; Airs. Bering, yes; Mr. h4ecash, yes; Alf, Petersen, ym SECOND READINGIPUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE Ordinance 09 -99 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 8.3 Acres Located on the West Side of Avery Road Approximately 600 Feet North of Dan Sherri Avenue from RI-B, Restricted Suburban Residential District, to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Trees Property) (Applicant: The Stonehenge Company, c/o Me Dioun, 6253 Riverside Drive, Suite 200, Dublin, Ohio 43016; represented by Jack Reynolds, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215) Ms. Clarke stated the site consists of 8 acres and is located north ofthe Dan Sherri subdivision. It is currently zoned R -1B, a Washington Township residential zoning classification, and the proposal is to rezone to PUD. This site was exempted from a moratorium in the southwest area because it had previously received concept plan approval. That concept plan has been tamed forward in the four ofthe preliminary development plan. The proposed use is for 11 two - family condominiums, with an office or small day care center along the front edge ofthe site. The Planning Commission recommended approval with 13 conditions on September 2,1999: 1) That the text be revised to include a commitment for a unique landscape design along the Avery Road frontage subject to approval at final development plan; 2) That the text be clarified to commit to equal quality architecture on all sides of all buildings, coordinating the architecture ofthe otficelday care with the residential component, complying with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Code, and providing buffers between this site and Dan -Sherri Avenue and along any non - residential areas; 3) That all bikepaths and sidewalks be shown on the plans; 4) That right-of- -way for Avery Road, which complies with the MS Consultants alignment study (100 feet from the existing centerline), be deeded to the City; 5) That left tum widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site along with adequate street lighting, as approved by staff; 6) That the access to the office/day care site along Tusswe0 Drive be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 7) That payment in lieu of load dedication (approximately $51,750) be paid prior to any building permits being issued, to meet the park requirement, 8) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design ofpublic mads, public and private utilities, and storm water management; 9) That the commercial property fronting Avery Road have a maximum lot coverage of60 percent; 10) That only one type offence be used within the development and be approved at the final development plan stage; 11) That there be a maximum oftwo residential buildings with all wood siding, and the remaining buildings be a mixture ofmasonry and wood; 12) Thai the homeowners' association maintain all common property; and 13) That Conditions 1, 2 and 3 be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council consideration. Mrs. Boring asked about the extension ofwater and sewer lines to the Dan Sherri subdivision. Mr. Kindra stated that there is a possibility that the extension will be done independent RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minnrcc of Dublin City Council Meetine Paee3 - mecting_ Held October 4, 1999 of this which was discussed at the last Council meeting. Mrs. Boring stated it was her understanding that Mr. Hale had agreed to the sewer and water line extension w part of this concept plan. ^ Ms. Diamond resident of Dan Sherri stated that she and her neighbors continue to have water problems, either drought or construction related. She contacted Mr. McDaniel and he sent her a petition to request a water and sewer study by the City. The Dan Sherri residents have signed the petition and are in agreement with this course of action. It was not her understanding that it was a commitment of the developer as part of the rezoning. The study is now underway. Mr. Hate, moresentine the developer stated that their plan is to bring the sewer line across the back of the properties to allow access to the sewer line by the residents of Dan Sherri. Mrs. Boring stated [lust she served on the Planning Commission at the time of the concept plan, and she recalled that Mr. Hale stated that sanitary sewer will be made available to the residents of Dan Sherri. Mr. Hensley clarified that the developer is proposing to build the sewer line in such a way that it would be easily accessed by the existing neighborhood. They could have serviced their project in a couple different ways, but they are purposely serving it in a way that it can be accessed by the existing neighborhood. The engineering study that Council authorized at the last meeting will provide more specifics for the homeowners. ^ Mr. Hale suggested that Council can require that the sewer be installed along the back of those four lots in order in provide access. The Kendall Ridge developers have already _ made a commitment to cul -de -sac Dan Sheen at a cost of $30,000. This was in response to the homeowners request. Mr. Adamek moved to add a condition that the applicant work with staff on the coordination of water and sewer lines in order to service the Dan Sherri residents as effectively as possible. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Mr. Hale agreed to the condition. Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kmnsmber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kmnstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, no. Ordinance 73 99(Amended) An Ordinamee providing por a Cl in ge A i Zo I g list 13 69 Apres Lopotpd at the Southwest Corner oFMereedesUbio, (P hate)am Fears urn Planned Commerce ni -._,ct Subarea D of the � to: PCD, Planned Conine ce Dist, let, Subm ea F of the (CrOWH Mercedes and Crown Cheyaler/jeep/Eagle Perimete Loop Road - 99- Meaeliarn and Ape! Architects, ine., 6161 Riverside Brive, Dublin, Oil 43017.) )4.y,r Kramnihor announced th-1 P4, M.Ca,h sn,i Min, Poring will Astain on dm mation They left the Cmwil Chambers at this tinie Ms rake W-d the, a. saris slight text changes for the ear dcabrships "lic! so, kw�tadmSudxas�l That area is also being expardedbyan additional 5 acres, atid it will Hides of the an, and so efe were some Mani _ in the exisling tax', thoreffive this whole a is being rezoned is being DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION September 2, 1999 CITY OF DUBLIN WSW of Pkm&g SHOO Shier rw Rood Mho, Ohio 430161236 Plw"U 614-761-6550 F= 614 - 761-6566 Web Sk xxwddAtn.dem The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Rezoning Application 99 -002Z - Preliminary Development Plan - Kendall Ridge Condominiums (previously known as Trees Property) Location: 8.3 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 feet north of Dan-Sherri Avenue. Existing Zoning: R -1B, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township). Request: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: Eleven two - family condominiums and an office/daycare center of 7,500 square feet. Applicant: The Stonehenge Company, c/o Mo Dioun, 6253 Riverside Drive, Suite 200, Dublin, Ohio 43016; represented by Jack Reynolds, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application with 13 conditions: 1) That the text be revised to include a commitment for a unique landscape design along the Avery Road frontage subject to approval at final development plan; 2) That the text be clarified to commit to equal quality architecture on all sides of all buildings, coordinating the architecture of the office /daycare with the residential component, complying with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Code, and providing buffers between this site and Dan- Sherri Avenue and along any non - residential areas; 3) That all bikepaths and sidewalks be shown on the plans; 4) That right-of-way for Avery Road, which complies with the MS Consultants alignment study (100 feet from the existing centerline), be deeded to the City; 5) That left turn widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site along with adequate street lighting, as approved by staff; "� Page 1 of 2 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION September 2, 1999 6. Rezoning Application 99 -002Z - Preliminary Development Plan - Kendall Ridge Condominiums (previously known asTrees Property)(Continued) 6) That the access to the office/daycare site along Tusswell Drive be subject to RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION at J al-Al Sffimf E. WingenfiUM Planner Page 2 of 2 approval by the City Engineer; 7) That payment in lieu of land dedication (approximately $51,750) be paid prior to any building permits being issued, to meet the park requirement; 8) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; 9) That the commercial property fronting Avery Road have a maximum lot coverage of 60 percent; 10) That only one type of fence be used within the development and be approved at the final development plan stage; 11) That there be a maximum of two residential buildings with all wood siding, and the remaining buildings be a mixture of masonry and wood; 12) That the homeowners' association maintain all common property; and ,,-.. 13) That Conditions 1, 2 and 3 be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council consideration. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION at J al-Al Sffimf E. WingenfiUM Planner Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 17 NOUN AM== 6. Rezoning Application 99 -002Z - Preliminary Development Plan - Trees Property Suzanne Wingenfield presented this rezoning for 8.3 acres on the west side of Avery Road. She said the plan repeats the land uses proposed at the concept plan. She showed a few slides. Ms. Wingenfield said the proposal is 22 residential units on eleven lots and a small office or day care along Avery Road. There is a half -acre of open space at the center of the site, and a wet pond for stormwater on the north edge. This plan shows 100 feet of right -of -way along Avery Road which conforms to the current alignment study. The building setback is 30 feet from the new right -of -way line. Because this section of Avery Road is a transition between industrial and residential areas, a 30 -foot setback is appropriate, provided that there will be a specific and unique landscape plan implemented along the frontage. Ms. Wingenfield said the text requires residential design and natural materials. The residential units will be designed to reflect a single - family look, and this should be repeated on the office use. The maximum building height is 30 feet. The day care or office use will be 7,500 square feet, and the residential units will be a minimum 1,550 square feet. Ms. Wingenfield said staff recommends approval with nine conditions: 1) That the text be revised to include a commitment for a unique landscape design along the Avery Road frontage subject to approval at final development plan; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 18 2) That the text be clarified to commit to equal quality architecture on all sides of all buildings, the architecture of the office /daycare coordinating with the residential component, compliance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Code, and provisions of buffers between this site and Dan - Sherri Avenue and between any non - residential areas; 3) That all bikepaths and sidewalks be shown on the plans; 4) That right -of -way for Avery Road, which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment study (100 feet from the existing centerline), is deeded to the City; 5) That left turn widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site along with adequate street lighting, as approved by staff; 6) That the access to the office /daycare site along Tusswell Drive be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 7) That payment in lieu of land dedication (approximately $51,750) be paid prior to any building permits being issued to meet the park requirement; 8) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; and 9) That Conditions 1, 2 and 3 be met prior to this case being scheduled for City council consideration. Ms. Wingenfield said the condo association is a forced association. She said the density is 2.69 dwelling units per acre, well within the Community Plan range. She said they do not have an exact computation of the lot coverage. Mr. Lecklider said his preference is to reduce the lot coverage below 70 percent. Mr. Fishman agreed. Mr. Lecklider likes the parking behind the building being screened from Avery Road. Ms. Wingenfield said they will dedicate 100 feet of right -of -way with this rezoning to meet the Thoroughfare Plan. A 30 -foot setback from the new right -of -way is proposed. Ms. Wingenfield said Kendall Ridge has a 75 -foot building setback based on the road widening. Ms. Wingenfield said Avery Road is a scenic road. This section of Avery Road has a wide variety of uses and setbacks. Staff believes a 30 -foot setback would be appropriate if they have a unique streetscape, more than a mound with a row of trees. Ms. Clarke said the first preference would be to switch the office and stormwater facility along Avery Road. Unfortunately, the engineering will not work with the pond along Avery Road. Staff believes this setback will make it compatible over the long term. Ms. Clarke said they are looking for an extraordinary landscape plan. Mr. Eastep thought placing a rezoning on a consent agenda was inappropriate. The intent of a consent agenda is to whip through cases, and rezoning actions are too critical for this procedure. "'�,., Mr. Eastep asked if there is a concern of wedging the office /daycare into a single - family Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 19 neighborhood. He asked if there has been any neighborhood opposition at this point. Ms. Wingenfield said she received a few phone calls, but not any opposition. Mr. Eastep said the pond may be too small to be attractive and suggested combining reserves. He asked about the size of the Reserve A pond. Ms. Cox said it takes up all of the reserve and is designed for the two - family area and part of Kendall Ridge. The day care site naturally drains toward Avery Road. She said this has been approved and is under construction. Mr. McCash asked if the 70 percent calculation of the exterior natural material used includes windows. He suggested it would be more appropriate to state that 70 percent of the opaque walls are natural materials. Ms. Wingenfield said they wanted the text to require equal architecture on all sides of the building, specifically for the day care or office along Avery Road. Mr. Lecklider thought that the commitment for subdued colors should be in the text. Ms. Wingenfield agreed. Mr. Lecklider asked what is staffs view on a unique landscape design. Ms. Wingenfield said it could take many different forms, possibly a grove of trees. Ms. Wingenfield said the sideyard is five feet for the residential units, and staff could not support any encroachments into those yards. She said the applicant has indicated that they do have rear porches or patio well within the permitted buildable area. Mr. Eastep asked about a note on fencing indicating chain link, board on board privacy, or plastic fencing shall be prohibited. Each of the twin - single owners will be able to put up his own fence along the property lines. Ms. Wingenfield said the only place they have indicated using a fence is with the day care. Mr. Eastep is not worried about the day care. Mr. McCash thought this would be addressed with the fence code revisions. Mr. Fishman said fences should be restricted in the text. Ben Hale, 37 West Broad Street, said this is a condo, and people are not going to own the lots. People will own their unit but the rest of the ground is owned and maintained by a condo association. The condo association will control fencing and it will be uniform. Mr. Hale said this project has been before the Commission as a concept plan, and it is a condo unit. He said Mo Dioun is the owner and developer. The condos will be built first. Mr. McCash asked about the maximum non -owner occupancy limitations in the condominium declarations. For FHA funding, they cannot go over ten percent non - owners occupied. Mr. Fishman said it is 30 percent. Mr. Hale said that when someone owns more than ten percent of the units they will start having financing problems. Mr. Fishman said Fanny Mae requires `..� 70 percent owner occupied. Mr. Hale said it could be a zoning restraint on alienation. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 20 r Mo Dioun, the applicant, said this is to be the entrance to Kendall Ridge. It must look like a single - family setting. Every unit will have an attached two -car garage. He said every building has one side - loading garage and one front loading garage. He said they mixed the materials, and each building has designated materials that will be alternated for variety and mix. Mr. Dioun said he is excited about the project and feels it will be a high - quality project. He said they will use wood siding on this project. Mr. Dioun said it would be basically brick and wood siding with 25 -year shingles, zero clearance prefaced fireplaces, and masonry chimneys. Mr. Harian asked if they were willing to meet with the Dan Sherri residents about back yard landscaping and buffering. Mr. Hale said yes. Mr. Fishman said if there were only two all -wood buildings, the rest should be a mix. Mr. Dioun agreed. Mr. Lecklider was concerned about the office setback after the widening of Avery Road. Mr. Hale said the setback on the first house located in Kendall Ridge is less than this. He said because the cemetery is across the street, all of the eventual right -of -way comes from this side of the street. He said they have agreed to do exceptional landscaping. Mr. Hale did not know what the lot coverage is, but agreed not to exceed 70 percent. Mr. Sprague said the Dublin Service Complex had tall dump trucks. He asked what is seen over that mound. Mr. Hale said if they need to add additional landscaping or a fence, etc., they will do so. Mr. Fishman said he does not know that 70 percent is appropriate for this rural area. It seems too high, and he suggested 50 percent. Mr. Hale said they would not exceed the lot coverage shown Mr. McCash said everyone is pushing 60 percent maximum lot coverage for the southwest area plan, but they should limit commercial to 60 percent lot coverage. Mr. Fishman does not have a problem with the residential use and believes they will do a quality job. He said he likes the concept with the lot coverage limit, but the text needs to be clear in case the site is sold. Mr. Lecklider said it is acceptable to him. Ms. Clarke asked if there going to be lot lines in the residential area. Mr. Hale said no Mr. Eastep said he supports no fences at all. The condo association controls it as continuous property, and there should be no fencing. Mr. Dioun said they might want to create some privacy with uniform fencing. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 21 Mr. Sprague said the Commission would approve any future fencing. Mr. Harian said there could be no perimeter fencing. Mr. Dioun agreed. Mr. Hale said the location and the design will be approved at the final development plan stage. Mr. I-ecklider is not in favor of fencing at all. Mr. Eastep agreed. Mr. Dioun said they would try and avoid fencing, but he would like an approval for some type of tasteful fencing. He said it would look better without fencing, but families living here will want to create some privacy. Mr. Fishman said only one kind of fence will be allowed for the entire project. Mr. Eastep said most Dublin subdivisions do not have any fencing. Mr. Dimm said the condo association would handle fence maintenance. There may be no fences, but he did not want fencing eliminated as a possibility. Mr. McCash said privacy fencing should be permitted for duplexes, with the plan showing "approved" fence locations.. Mr. Fishman made a motion to approve this rezoning with 13 conditions: 1) That the text be revised to include a commitment for a unique landscape design along r- the Avery Road frontage subject to approval at final development plan; �... 2) That the text be clarified to commit to equal quality architecture on all sides of all buildings, coordinating the architecture of the office/daycare with the residential component, complying with the Tree Preservation Ordinance and Iandscape Code, and providing buffers between this site and Dan - Sherri Avenue and along any non- residential areas; 3) That all bikepaths and sidewalks be shown on the plans; 4) That right -of -way for Avery Road, which complies with the MS Consultants alignment study (100 feet from the existing centerline), be deeded to the City; 5) That left turn widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site along with adequate street lighting, as approved by staff; 6) That the access to the office/daycare site along Tusswell Drive be subject to approval by the City Engineer; 7) That payment in lieu of land dedication (approximately $51,750) be paid prior to any building permits being issued, to meet the park requirement; 8) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; 9) That the commercial property fronting Avery Road have a maximum lot coverage of 60 percent; 10) That only one type of fence be used within the development and be approved at the final development plan stage; 11) That there be a maximum of two residential buildings with all wood siding, and the remaining buildings be a mixture of masonry and wood; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - September 2, 1999 Page 22 12) That the homeowners' association maintain all common property; and 13) That Conditions 1, 2 and 3 be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council \.., consideration. Ben Hale agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Harian seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) NO= - III -1K•1;7eZt]Kel i$ aer�{pl aWM Ordinmma No.._� 170.98.. Passed- .... .._ ............ ___ ........... .JO..._.. AN ORDINANCE EJITENDING THE TEMPORARY ZONING MORATORIUM IN TEE SOUTHWEST AREA OF THE CITY, AND DECLARING ANEMERGENCY WHEREAS, Dublin City Council assumed emergency Ordnance 77 -98 on the 6' day of July, 1998 implementing a temporary rezoning moratmiumathe Southwest Area fm a six (6) month period; and WHEREAS, die aforementioned ardmence. a copy of which is attached hesem and incorporated hmei , desanbad the Southwest Ara ofdie City as the ana located generally, tomb of S.R. 33 and west of 1 -270, as an area aipmisvcing itimeadng developmem prraetm e; and WHEREAS, during this six (6) mouth period, Staff and CouoeiPs Community Developmeat Communist have interviewed and reamed -a consultant to Prepare a Southwest Area Surly which is the that in a two step process b (ally develop a revised plan fmthis arer and WHEREAS, the Community Development Committee mm on November 9, 1998 to review a pmposa submitted by Wallace Roberts & Todd to serve a urban planning and dwieo consWma for the Southwest Area Plan; and is WHEREAS, the Community Development Commonest recommended that the temporary rezoning moratorium is the Southwest Ara be extended for an additional six (6) month .. peiod and that the aformexammed consultants be retained on feudist the planning process; and WHEREAS, Saffhas recommended that four development proposals which mtaed the reaming process prim to the implementation of the temporary moramrim, be exempted from this moratorim extrnsum in order that they may proceed with development; and WHEREAS, for all me, reasons act forth above, and for the rmaom no forth in Ohdimeace 77 -98, Council fords it necessary m extend the temporary rezoning moratorium in the Southwest Ara to enable the planning process to Continue to inswe compatible growth and development within the southwest Area NOW �THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by Council ofthe City ofDublm, State of chi, L ofthe elected members miemrng that: samiemL Thetempmay,..ggmombrimumfmtbin Ordimu 77- 98isbereby �. extended for an additional six (6) months through July 5, 1999, Suct m1. Except as set forth in Section 3 hours, during this extended momtorimperiod, I City Council and the Planning Commission than rot formally act upon any r<mdng applications for lend located within the Southwest Area of the City meleas the aformendoned issues have been addressed by Staffer the satisfaction of Council. Somme 'l. The following parcels/developments shall be exempt from the tams and '! provisions of this mem nnm; Young Tract, Ememm Road; Rezoning Application 97.097Z; Wmdadiler Patel, Wilcox Road; Rezoning Application 97 -033Z; Trees Tract, Avery Road; approved Concept Plan 97- 035Cp, Avery village Commom, Avery Road; approved Concept Plan, 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road RECORD OF ORDINANCES ow sa anra a..wamu Section d. This mer rium shall not apply to my complete rezoning applications which were properly submitted to the City for approval prior m the effective dam of Ordinzoce 77 -98. S,.nwm c I tis Ordimnce h dalared a be m emorgency for the immediam preseration ofthe public health, safety W w 1fare and due m the fiat tlut development urvet specific m the Somhwat plan am cmmnay being ad&csud a ordm a pseaeve 0e character W oanne oftbat cation ofthe City of0ubliu, W to meet the goals of the Community, pha passed this S74�L day ofm 199.% 1 Odra 4 I &A . ncn N µ'r Ud',mpnAaaJuesn ran sank M de Pr vi >Ala vm•! +me wo1 SMOn I11.1f of tfu oelo eevlud fats. n 1i1A (w f (rmo'I, W , oak 9 C u •.I aieATAMAVaenv]RmaAMOarewaT.Almt "-OOZZ li n Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Cl RECORD OF ACTION April 17, 1997 CITY OR DU01.P1 5800 56ier Rings toad Dubtk OR 43016 -7295 9hww/IDO: 614/761-6550 Fox: 614/761 -6506 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Concept Plan 97 -035CP - Trees Property Location: 8.3 acres located on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 585 feet north of Dan Sherri Avenue. Existing Zoning: R -113, Limited Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Zoning District). Request: Review and approval of a concept plan under the PUD, Planned Unit Development District provisions of Section 153.056. Proposed Use: A development of 11 two - family buildings and an 8,000 square foot daycare center. 1 . Applicant: Marion E. Trees, 227 West Cook Road, Columbus, Ohio 43214; and Patrick is M. Grabill and Company, 5500 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Jackson B. Reynolds ]II, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this concept plan because it is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and the MS Consultants alignment study, with ten conditions: 1) That right -of -way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at the time of rezoning; 2) That left turn lane widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That access to Avery Road be prohibited for the daycare center, and that access to the east -west road be provided as far west as possible. 4) That a landscaping plan be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 5) That architectural design standards be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 6) That stormwater management include a wet basin design on Reserve "A "; 7) That payment in lieu of land be provided to meet the park and open space requirement, about $51,000; 8) That a 16 -inch water line be extended from the north and be provided across the entire Avery Road frontage; Page 1 of 2 99 -0022 Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION r' RECORD OF ACTION �+ April 17, 1997 1. Concept Plan 97 -035CP - Trees Property (Continued) 9) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, private drives, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; and 10) That a common maintenance be established for the residential areas. * Ben W. Hale, representing the applicants agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: This concept plan was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council at a later date. STAFF CERTIFICATION I � i� Page 2 of 2 99 -0022 Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road MINUTES r DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APRIL 17, 1997 CITY OF OURCIN 5800 Shies Rings Road Dubrin, ON 43016 -7495 PlummADD: 614/761 -6550 Fox: 614/7616506 1. Concept Plan 97 -035CP - Trees Property (Approved 7 -0) 2. Informal Review - Development Plan 97 -04ODP - Wellington Place /Brandon Wellington Place Park Improvements - 7467 Coventry Woods Drive (No action taken) 3. Rezoning Application 97 -036Z - Revised Preliminary Development Plan - Metro Center - Pizzutl Development - 545 Metro Place North (Tabled 7 -0) 4. ISual Development Plan 97 -010FDP - Metro Center - Extended Stay America - 450 Metro Place North (Approved 5-2) Marilee /asows: i - Zuerche called the meeting to rder at 6:30 p.m. O er Commissioners attending hn F , Jce Harian, Cathy ring, George Peplow, m Lecldider and Tim Sprague. ember attending included Li Fierce, Mary Newcom , John Talentino, Janet .. Jordan, ch ky, Randy Bowman, d Libby Farley. Ms. Bori 'on to accept all of a documents into the r rd. Mr. Peplow seconded. The vote ows: Mr. Fenara, y ; Ms. Chinnici- Zuerche ,yes; Mr. Lecldider , yes; Mr. Sprague, . Harian, yes; Mr. plow, yes; and Ms. Bo g, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) Ms. Chi ercher said a applicant for Case Concept Plan 97 -035CP - Trees requested e be delayed u later this evening b se of a previous commitment. 1. Concept Plan 97 -035CP - Trees Property John Talentino presented this concept plan and slides of the area. He said the site is zoned R -1B, and 22 units of two-family housing plus a daycare/office area are proposed. The site contains 8- plus aclres, and the density is about three units per acre. The Galli tract density, as approved by Council, is to be 2.8 units per acre. The Southwest Area Plan proposes a density of 2.75 overall for Subarea 10. The MS Consultants Avery Road alignment study needs to be incorporated for right -of -way. A boulevard entrance design is proposed. 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 17, 1997 Page 2 The park is one -half acre and is too small to meet the city policy, and staff recommends payment of a fee rather than land dedication here. Staff believes the pond should be a wet basin design. He said this developer is working with another developer for cooperative storm water facilities. He said the land uses are compatible and it is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan. It conforms to the MS study and provides a connection to the Galli tract. Staff recommends approval with nine conditions: 1) That right -of -way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at the time of rezoning; 2) That left turn lane widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That access to Avery Road be prohibited for the daycare center, and that access to the east - west road be provided as far west as possible. 4) That a landscaping plan be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 5) That architectural design standards be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 6) That stormwater management include a wet basin design on Reserve "A "; 7) That payment in lieu of land be provided to meet the park and open space requirement, about $51,000; 8) That a 16 -inch water line he extended from the north and be provided across the entire Avery Road frontage; and �. 9) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, private �... drives, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; r Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked about the park donation. Mr. Talentino said the greenspace was a nice feature, but public maintenance of a series of many small parks is not a viable concept. He said larger parks are more efficient. Ms. Boring said there are other parks being developed in the area. Ms. Fierce said the staff is planning for another major park to the west of this site. Ben Hale said he has a standing conflict on the third Thursday of the month and needs a late slot on that agenda for his cases. He said this site abuts the Galti tract and demonstrated the available park sites. He said this is an empty- nester concept, something like Weybridge. Mr. Hale is working with M/I on the detention requirements. The plan will meet the right -of -way dedication requirements and will not have direct Avery Road access. It is a good transitional use. Sanitary sewer will be made available to the residents of Dan Sherri. He said the green space will remain in the plan whether or not there is park credit, and a homeowners association will maintain it. He agreed to all of the staff report conditions. 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road 'r. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 17, 1997 Page 3 Ms. Boring generally supported the plan as a transitional use between the existing neighborhood and the property to the north and emphasized that the concept plan is non- binding. • She thought the park area needed to be private. Mr. Harian and Mr. Peplow agreed. Mr. Harian said he agreed with the staff report that a five -foot sideyard was quite minimal, and encroachments should not be permitted. Mr. Peplow agreed. Mr. Hale said a lot will be deleted from Galli. He said the general maintenance will be taken care of by one entity. The initial intent is not to sell units. The rear setback will be 25 percent of the lot depth. Mr. Peplow said this appears to be a good transitional use. Marion Trees said he and his wife own the property. He asked for a copy of the staff report Phyllis Diamond presented a letter to the Commission from her neighbor in the Dan-Sherri neighborhood. She said she preferred small offices or single -family development. She did, however, like the idea of a common maintenance if this is rental property. She said the Dan-Sherri subdivision has a one unit per acre density, and this project may be a bit too dense. Jeff Kaltenbach agreed with Ms. Diamond's's comments. He thought a buffer zone, trees, or mounding would be appropriate along the property line. He wanted more architectural details about this proposal. Mr. Hale said he will meet with the neighbors again about the architecture as the project develops. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher said this is highly encouraged. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher wanted a condition regarding the homeowners' association and common uniform maintenance. Mr. Hale agreed. She thought a lower density project would be more preferable. Mr. Lecktider reiterated these comments. Ms. Fierce said it is in the Hilliard School District. Mr. Harian supported a lower density, consistent with the Southwest Area Plan. Ms. Boring emphasized that a concept plan is non - binding. The views of the neighbors should be incorporated. Other Commissioners agreed. Mr. Sprague thought this offered a good transitional use. He wanted landscaping incorporated. He believes this plan uses more integrated approach within the Avery Road corridor. Mr. Ferrara made the motion for approval because it is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and the MS Consultants alignment study, with ten conditions: 1) That right-of-way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consultants Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing centerline) be deeded to the City at the time of rezoning; Italics indicate where amended on June 5, 1997 by Commission. 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - April 17, 1997 Page 4 2) That left turn lane widening on Avery Road be provided at the entrance to the site, as approved by staff; 3) That access to Avery Road be prohibited for the daycare center, and that access to the east - west road be provided as far west as possible. 4) That a landscaping plan be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 5) That architectural design standards be provided at the time of preliminary development plan application; 6) That stormwater management include a wet basin design on Reserve "A "; 7) That payment in lieu of land be provided to meet the park and open space requirement, about $51,000; 8) That a 16 -inch water line be extended from the north and be provided across the entire Avery Road frontage; 9) That all Engineering Division requirements be met on design of public roads, private drives, public and private utilities, and stormwater management; and 10) That a common maintenance be established for the residential areas. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; and Mr. Ferrara, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher noted that the letter from Mrs. Diamond was submitted for the record. 2. Informal Review - Development n 97 -04 )DP - Wellin h Place/Brandon - Par Improvements - 7467 Coven oods Drive Lisa Fierce presented this infor al review of a developm t plan which was pos ed at the April 10 Commission mee' due to the late hour. a development plan is r an active neighborhood park located n a 5.755 -acre site zon LR, Planned Low Den . Residential District, on the west side o Coventry Woods Drive, proximately 600 feet no of Crosshaven Lane, and north of Kit ' Lane. The site is rel vely flat with some plan aterial along the periphery. There is wooded area to the sou with a sinkhole. The i nt of this informal review is to receive back from the Commi ion prior to the formal re iew expected in May. The frontage of a site on Conventry W Drive and X Lan includes the development of large, play areas a[ the north est and soutr and tennis, basketball, and tetherball in the middle. A taupe lored sheltercted of wood and metal with a dark g n standing seam or dark rown dimensionroof will be constructed. Also plann are a dark green and tan lored metal and structure in the tot lot, picnic tables, and benches. Ms. Fierce said funding fo a first phase of the $35 ect had been approved by City Council and after the bidding process, construction should begin in August and be completed in 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road 0 . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS y✓ Minutes of . �i{y- Ceuna4A4eeun4 Peg In Meeting Ian W. Clarke stated that the proposal is to Rand the three lots will coMOSm to R approval on May 1 with 8 coad'niom; 1) That 40 fat ofright -of-.y aim firul plat consistent with the Thoroughfi 2) That Wsong trees and stonewall drawings and placed at least 15 feet fro, comtmcsiom S) That a 10 -foot nigely e stonewalls; 4) That a minimum pal he me.saisfed irm ofa ci5) That the park fely in forwarding this plat to Cand 6) That the applicastW1) Council review ofthe Prlat; 7) The public sardtbean of any building pemtilsong r Engines; and uth High Streetbededicate oche Ci"ththe an; protested with fneaog( on all construction tra ttuNta or wale Win nand during aed on the plat for the seofprmIlm xi with the plat, whi is appropriate foange of S' 00 m ,218, to be resolvad prior to recor' ofthefnalphr, enorm waled ion wagmpnor m d to the sou proposed lot prior towings for a meet the rtqumarents o 8) Thaproperdau g the existing leach field available), and the permits be obtained fr( for hie leach field abet mnent, with wmia movidI Ms. Clarke stand it war. Mr. Campbell not lhaa states "West side side of South Hi Smeee" cat at jHdt�gasecxarded or. Eie addedthat dwYar n intend to plea homy setbacks, u they would ' pmuled that the language th stub moved to approve pre . ter gasecouded them n- -Mr. Campbell ;Mr [�.:, war hvomble u w ell. High Street" but this old be "East should be aA iide tMt is a )ringing in architects who '.n.. in historic eachsideoftheproperty. edoeshavea o stagger them. condifionmads"to fisaction of staff." imiarypWwiththee ruditiomoUlamdng Reins, yes Ms. a Pittalugs, yes; Nice. ;ash, yes Mrs. S' I. Yes. II Mr. Rindra stated that Wi-En" all parW of 1.2 sines end 'ving Nc storm water dttenaov simply mearethey don't have adttation basin. pill stores waterwiO Bow to the riv has reviewed this and is mmeading approval. Mr. Gmpbcll moved m a he stone water dttemi waives a 182 South }Bgh Street. Mr. Rarer seconded the �I Vom on the nxxxm - M rs. Stillwell, ycx; Mayor IGamtu eq M Mr. McCuh, yes; Ms. Hide Pivaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. '44{�M('o��t plea -Trees Finnerty AI rs. Boring stated this concept plan involves 8 acres on the west side of Avery Road, approximately 600 felt north of Dan Sheen. The proposal is to put a public street into service in that area, and it would be developed with odsee or day care at the front and along Avery Road. Behind that would be 11 two- family dwellings. The staff found this to be a good transitional use and memomeads approval. The Planning Commission recommended approval on April 17, 1997 by a vote of 7 -0. Their approval was based on 10 conditions contained in the Record of Action! - 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of ^ublincity- 6aunailMeetu; 1' Meeting 1) That right -of-way for Avery Road which complies with the MS Consumers Alignment Study (100 feet from the existing underline) be deeded to the City at the time ofrezmdng; j.2) That left turn Inc widening on Avery Road be provided at the announce to the side, as approved by staff; 3) That access to Avery Road be prohibited for the day care emmr, and that access to the esst -west road be provided as fir wort as possible; 114) That a landscaping plan be provided at the time ofprelimirury development plan application; j5) That architectural design standards be provided at the time ofpreWninary development ^, plan application; .:6) That storm water management include a wa basin design ofRemrve "A''; y) That payment in lien ofland be provided to meet the pmk and open space requirenmm, about $51,000; 9) That 16 -inch water line be extended from the north and be Provided across the entire :. Avery Road Rontagc; 9) That all Engineering Division ryuiremens be met on design ofpublic roads, private i drivel public end private utilities, and storm water mevgemnt; and ii 10) That is cemmn maintenance be established fm theresidentid aeei_ !i Ms. Clarke stated that approval ofa concept plan for aPM does not vast my rights with the I,develnpa a does ant aff tt t amual zorkng ofthe prop eery It auth mi es tie developer to go forward with more complicated and costly engineering work in order to submit a the preliminary development plan most be filed within 6 months following Council's approval ofthe concept plan. Staffbelieves this is a good plan and that the attest sun be, exceeded to she west to service the Chilli tact The Chilli tract bes immediately to the south ofthis property Pen Hale rmremnther "Whard Pat Cabin stated that wish this site, they will have to work on the design ofthe units in order to provide a lot of derail at the preliminary development plan stage. They believe this use constitutes a good transition between existing single family to the south and essentially commercial property to the rmnk Mr. Reiner asked d Reserve C will he maintained by a Mmnwncn association. Mr. Hale responded that they agreed at Planning Commission to have a homeowners associat ion for purposes eflawnmaintannce etc H eassumptionlathatthe City Engioner will require this maintenance by the homeowners association. It will be a mandatory assocation Ms. Hide Pitttluga commented thin in view ofthe recent tabling of a remrting along Avery in this arm. perhaps discussion ore bigger plan for the area would be appropriate versus Piecemeal nomings_ Ms. Stillwell asked if Mr. Hale would comment on the proposed density for this area. '- Mr. Hale responded that they believe the density is appropriate in view ofthe essentially commercial area to the death. They have tried to maintain the green spun, inmrpoatc the roadway, and aceomma date the property to the muth. Mr Reiner asked what the materials will be for the units. Mr. Grabill responded that it has not been determined at this point. Mrs. Stillwell noted that she likes the fact that the green space will remain whether or not credit is given for it. Mr. McCash stated that his only concern is that the tat be developed as an integrated neighborhood with the Gets tract. Mrs goring reminded the applicant that he was instructed by Planning Commission to kmp the area residents informed ofthe plans. 99 -002Z Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of ,.. bliaGisy- Council -Musts ..�°e �+ Meeting ;We II Held Tune23,1997 -9— f iMr. Hale responded that they have ntn with the neighbors and have assured sheathed sewers willbedoneonboththermMandsmnh. Hewdlmeetwkhthemagamwhmthedesngnn completed Prior to the Planning Conmdstion meeting. Mr. Campbell moved to approve the concept plan subject to the conditions orphaning and Zoning Commdssion. Mr. Raman seconded the motion. Ms. Fide PitWugs asked if Council would be interested in having a C ..scum discuss comprehensive planning for this whole mu moth and south of Avery. Mr. Campbell responded that this is being discussed u pat ofthe Community Plan work. Vote on the mmmn -Mr. Campbell, yet; Mr. Remar, yes; Mr. fide Pinaluga ya; Mn. Borm i, yes; Mayor Kracember, yes; Mr. MoCash, yr{ Mrs. Stillwell, yes. j Ms. Clarke stated that Council actions need enthe final platbeforeit canberarorded. Planning Commission ecomemaded appro on August 1, 1996 with 14 confident 1) That the developer meet all the ng and preliminary plat conditions; 2) That the definition of-an-build re' be amoded and noted on t, and homcowam'usudation sham the landscaping in the no -Wlda 3) Thar am "no parking" so noted on the plat, and "tot veld access' be noted on the plat for all led frontages on blim Road or Enterald Parkway, 4) That the fencing info Lion from page 30fthe prelimi evelopment plan test (July 2, 1996 version) be n ed on the plat with the dated "ch are included in the tat as figures 1, 2 and 3; 5) That it is dam red to the utisfamion ofsmfi s 1, 2,10-12, and 18 arc buildable with A and' gs, swmurcs, and famres t are typical on Ill in Coventry Woods in comp with all development standards; ! 6) That th ppGuntPmvideaclerdem con Iplanforthearchitedurconallsi and rear feu Ofhousas abutting Emend Par /�y/ T shot lone easements alone Dublin Road Emerald Parkwav frontana be ah6wn on e) a%t the side yud setbacks rcqui sshosm intheaiegle family desi ideWw of the a*mved most be changed to rud'Tlo . 8' m "mimum ova suds wmbinad s" yard setback 20 p..t of lot width "; 9) That revised final landscape grading linduded e submined that are uistmt wtM1 the designs for Emerald Pvkwsy.end trot plan bmitted, u appro by tuff; ]0) Than 1.36 aces (2S ofthe propo5 ease park) ediwed ma the City by gmeralwmmAydesdinm' "onwimhthemgofRilliles, n1; 11) That the devekopapr 'de the naurayn mimigati of the evsting maim 4 dowasurem ofthe box al the 24 -mch culvd the ml bang iuulled by the City, as required by the City "veer, I12) That the deva metal) an agM1t -foot bh alo Dublin Aoed as part ofthe I,I �public improvanm rmhe subdivision, and theev oper cooperate vrithfieplmn fora it tm-foot( &dmd ard)bikepeth along Dubliluding revision ofthe grading plan, �! landscape plan, plat for parallel mwment(s), Council chooses to pursue that design ll) Theta ofthe changes required above butted to staBwithin 30 days; and 14) T 1 restrictions afficon, developabiI lots be induded in the decd restrictions. Mayor Kraumber moved to approv e theft jfplat ofMIiila with the conditions ofPlanning Mr. Campbell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mayor Kmastu r, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Ms. Fide Pittaluga, yes, Mr . Raii+ner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. cCash. yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. ' Ms, Clarke stated that the i 1 let for the Riverside Hospital PCD involves the roads that are necessary to service the shopping center which is roaring completion. The final plat includes " -0022 Rezoning Application Trees Property Avery Road Proposed Development Text As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 KENDALL RIDGE OFFICE /DAYCARE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT TEXT THE STONEHENGE COMPANY A. PERMITTED USES a. The use of the parcel shall consist of an office /daycare center. The originally plated 8.3 acre parcel was developed in accordance with the approved Concept Plan 97 -03CP (Trees Property) and was previously approved by Planning and Zoning Commission on 4/17/97 and later approved by City Council on 6/23/97. B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a. SETBACKS i. Right of Way: The building setback from the right -of -way of Avery Road shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The parking shall be setback 25 feet from the right -of -way. ii. Rear Yard: The building setback shall be 25 feet and the parking setback shall be 20 feet. iii. Side Yard: The building setback shall be 25 feet and the parking setback shall be 20 feet b. Maximum Building Height: The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. c. Access: Access to the office /daycare shall be permitted only from Tuswell Drive and shall be a minimum of 200' from the centerline of Avery Road. d. Parking Requirements: The required minimum parking spaces for the Office /Daycare is 1 space per 250 SF and shall compile with section 153.212 of the City of Dublin Code. C. DESIGN GUIDELINES a. Office/Daycare Center: The building shall be a maximum of 10,000 sq. ft. in area. Exterior materials shall be stone, brick, wood siding, or stucco . All sides of the building shall have equal quality in architecture and materials used and shall be coordinated with the residential buildings. The building shall be designed as a single story structure. Lot coverage for the office /daycare site shall not exceed 60% of the lot. b. Parking Lot Lighting: Shall meet the requirements set by the City of Dublin to minimize the impact on the adjacent residential property. c. Signage: Signage for the office /daycare center shall be a monument sign limited to 6' in height and the sign area shall be regulated by Section 153.164 of the Proposed Development Text As submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission May 18, 2017 Dublin Zoning Regulations. Any proposed signage shall be submitted to the City of Dublin for review and approval. d. Landscaping: Landscaping for buffering, replacement trees, open spaces and the office /daycare center shall submitted (per the Final Development Plan) to the City of Dublin for review and approval. All trees that meet the definition of a protected tree by the City of Dublin code shall be saved or replaced on site in accordance with Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Code. e. Fencing: One type offence shall be used on the site subject to approval at the final development plan. Chain -link, board on board privacy and plastic fencing shall be prohibited. Any playground associated with a daycare shall be to the north and west of the building and surrounded by a 5' high wrought iron fence. D. UTILITIES a. Storm Sewer: The existing retention basin and storm sewers from the adjacent Kendall Ridge Subdivision shall be a shared facility for the originally plated subdivision. The surface drainage for the site shall be handled on site and in conjunction with the existing retention basin and shall meet all applicable requirements of the City of Dublin.