Loading...
07-06 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank. ]nc. Form No. 30043 Ordinance No. 07-~~ Passed . 20 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.8 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EMERALD PARKWAY, AT THE INTERSECTION OF INNOVATION DRIVE, FROM RI, RESTICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (SCHOEDINGER FUNERAL HOME - 6055 EMERALD PARKWAY -CASE NO. OS-182Z). NOW, THERE BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this ~ day o , 2006. Mayor -Presiding Officer Attest: Clerk of Council Sponsor: Land Use and Long Range Planning ORDINANCE 107-06 ADDITIONAL CONDITION APPENDED BY COUNCIL ON 2-21-06 Condition 15: a. That the text language on page 4, Section A1.11 Architecture: 1. and page 8, Section B1.11 Architecture: 1. be amended by removing the second sentence and replacing it with the following sentence: "Accent colors will be submitted with the final development plan." b. That the text language on page 4, Section A1.11 Architecture: 3. c. and page 8, Section B1.11 Architecture: 3. c. be deleted in its entirety. c. That the text language on page 7, Section B1.09: 2. be revised to read, "All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be fully enclosed and not visible from the street." d. That the text language on page 6, Section B1.06 2. be revised to read, "Building setbacks from Innovation Drive shall be 100 feet; however, building setbacks may be reduced to a distance less than 100 feet, but not less than 25 feet upon approval of the final development plan." Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016 Memo Phone: 614-410-4600 • Fax: 614-410-4747 CITY nF DUBLIN TO: Members of Dublin City Council FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manage~i~-~..~..5 • ~~+~a.c~~ q~.,~.J DATE: February 15, 2006 U INITIATED BY: Daniel D. Bird, FAICP, Land Use and Long Range Planning Director ~~~'~ RE: Second Reading for Rezoning Ordfnance: Ordinance 07-06 (Case No. 05-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway) SUNIlVIARY• Rezoning application OS-1822 for the Schoedinger Funeral Home, located on Emerald Parkway at the intersection of Innovation Drive, is being forwarded for second reading. This application requests a change in zoning for 8.8 acres from RI, Restricted Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to approve the development standards to accommodate a 14,700- square-foot funeral home and adjacent reception center, and 32,000 square feet of office development. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved this rezoning on January 5, 2006 with 14 conditions. Conditions 1 through 3, and 9 through 14 have been addressed in the development text. Conditions 4 through 8 will be addressed at the time of final development plan approval. Conditions: 1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway; 2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material; 3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional; 4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic architecture for the development; 5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and Flood Control Ordinances; 6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the floodway + 20 feet on the plans; 7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and based on the traffic study; 8) That the site comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject to approval by the City Engineer, 9) That the text be revised to include language that will allow for flexibility in the building setbacks in Subarea B; 10) That the text be revised to state that all refuse will be fully screened; 11) That the text be revised to state that the scale of each building shall be aided through the use of articulated building elements; 12) That the text be revised to remove the reference to tree protection snow fencing and that a stronger fencing be included at the final development plan stage; 13) That the text be revised to state that all signage shall be externally illuminated; and 14) That the text be revised to state that the maximum height of all buildings shall be 38 feet. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the second reading of Ordinance 07-06 with the 14 conditions adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 5, 2006. JEA Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016 Phone: 614-410-4600 • Fax: 614-410-4747 M e m o C11'Y OF DUBLIN TO: Members of the Dublin City Council FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager DATE: February 6, 2006 INITIATED BY: Daniel D. Bird, FAICP, Land Use and Long Range Planning Director RE: First Reading for Rezoning Ordinance: Ordinance 07-06 (Case No. OS-1822 -Schoedinger Funeral Home - Emerald Parkway) SUMMARY: Rezoning application OS-1822 for the Schoedinger Funeral Home, located on Emerald Parkway at the intersection of Innovation Drive, is being forwarded for first reading. This application requests a change in zoning for 8.8 acres from RI, Restricted Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to approve the development standards to accommodate a 14,700-square-foot funeral home and adjacent reception center and 32,000 square feet of office development. Additional information regarding this case is available for public viewing at 5800 Shier- Rings Road in the offices of Land Use and Long Range Planning. The second reading of Ordinance 07-06 is scheduled at the February 21, 2006 City Meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Ordinance 07-06 by City Council at the February 21, 2006 meeting. JEA N ~~ City of Dublin 05-1822 n ( Land Use and Schoedinger Funeral Home N Feet Long Range Planning Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive o Zso soo 1 a V CI'CY OF Dl'B1.1N land Ulf and long Ruq~ flatwllnR 5803 Shin-Ri1Sis Rwd p„W'n. pnio 43016-1236 P1Y+'1n: 100: 614. s I O 4600 w.; 614110-4747 ORDINANCE NUMBER 71 I `t-Y n CITY COUNCIL (FIRST READING) CITY COUNCi~ COUNCIL ACT ON ed to contact land Use and Long Range Planning for assistance and to discuss the NOTE• Applicants are highly encourag Iication. Rezoning process prior to submitting a formal app FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Amount Received: Receipt No: Type of Request: Application No: MIS Fee No: N, S, E, W (Cirde) Side of: Distance from Nearest Intersection: Nearest Intersection: I, PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: FE E, W (Circle) from Nearest Intersection AND ~q 2/3 2006 ~ PD Preliminary pevelopment Plan (Section 153.053) CIN OF DUBLIN ° °~1ef (Please Describe) LONG RANGE PLANNING PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be com fed. Property Address: North of Innovation Drive /West of Emerald Par way Parcel Size: Tax IDIParoel Number(s): 273 008178 (mss) 8 8 + acres 273-007012 / ~~ Cand Use peveiopment: undeveloped Proposed Land Use Development: Funeral Services and Office Total Acxes to be Rezoned: Requested zoning Distrk~ 8.8 ± acr Existing Zoning District: RI PUD Page 1 of 5 ..EXHIBIT .~ _ JY ~ t EXHIBIT "B" REZONING APCpL~cA~T~ON TO EXPIRE P8Z Action: P8Z Date(s): Received By: Date Received: . ~- L 111, KCLVn,n~a .~ ..-.. _.----- - - _ Statebrletyhowthaproposedzoninganddeo laPm d alt theenox rthwest orn r o ~~~tersection of The subject property is 1 Emerald Parkway. and Innovation Drive and consists of 8.8± acres zone~oi~hehP RI, Restricted Industrial, zoning distusetas a funeralshomes xeceptiongcenter, and 000 square _ Planned Development, district for remembrance garden on 4.4 acres and off ToeosalCerdvides ancessential service feet on the remaining 4.4 acres. The P P P which is not currently provided within the City of Dublin. Land to the west and south is zoned RI and is undevelopeed PCD,tPlanned Co~nercial Districtity zoned RI. To the east is vacant land zon Slate briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan arid, if applicable, how the proposed rezoning meets the criteria for Planned Districts [Section 153.052(B)]: The Future Land Use Map, in the Dublin Community.Plan, shows this site as "Existing Non-ResidentialdiesLfor the CitygnaThenproposedsuseseofbfuneral home comprehensive traffic stu and office are similar to office designations to the south. The site iSubarea two office designaeioYeceotion center anderemembrancedgarden consisting of A is a funeral hom P approximately 14,700 squaeetfintsize.SuTheeproposallissconsistent withaland no to exceed 40,000 square f compatable to, proximate developments and development patterns and aides in to Ithe provision of an essential service to the City of Dublin. HAS A PREVIOUS APPLICATfON TO REZONE THE PROPERTY BEEN DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL WITHIN THE LAST O Y gMO~ 0O ff yes, tlst when and state the basis for reconsideration as noted by Section 153.234(A)(3): IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT FLAN ATTACHED? ~ YF~ ~ ~ f$ YES ^ ~ IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? Pape 2 of 5 t 1 PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR I mm~ FaAReFe R~ a~dditl~al espies of rer sect submittals are IreQluired~for the P annln9 and IV~ may later request Plans that y~rporate review ce Zoni Commission hea ' . TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS AND THIRTEEN (13) COPIES Please notarize agent authorization, necessary. ~ FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ~ FOURTEEN (14) TAX PARCEL ID MAPS Indicating property owners and Parcel numbers for all parcels within 500 feet of the site. 1Sl TEN (10) SCALED, SITE/STAKING PLANS SHOWING: X7 a. North arrow and bar scale. ro osed conditions and sWdures (significant natural features, landscaping. b Location, size and dimensions of all existing and p P uare footages, parking, open structures, additions, decks. access ways, parking)• a Proposed Uses (Regional transportation system, densities, number of dwellings, building/unit types, sq space, etc.). d. Size of the site in acreslsquare feet. h~_of-wa easements, and other information related to the site. e. All property lines, setbacks, street centerlines. rig Y. f. F~dsting and proposed zoning district boundaries. g. Use of land and loption of structures on adjacent Properties. ~ IF APPLICABLE, TEN (10) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING SCALED PLANS: a. Grading Plan. b. Landscaping Plan. c. Lighting Plan. d. Utility arxf/or Stonnwater Plan. e. Tree Survey, Tree Preservation and Tree Replacement Plans. IF APPLICABLE, TEN (10) COPIES OF SCALED, ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS with proposed colors and materials noted. IF APPLICABLE, FOUR (b) COPIES OF SCALED DRgWINGS INDlCAT1NG: ~ a. Location of signs and sign type (wall, ground, projecting, or window). b, Sign dimensions, including letter sizes and proposed distance from sign to grade. c. Copy layout and lettering styles (fonts) of signage. d. Materials and manufacturer to be used in fabrication. e, Total area of sign face (including frame). f, -Type of illumination. MATERIALICOLOR SAMPLES (swatches, photos, plans, or product specifications). Include manufacturer name and number. ~/, CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS: Please attach additional sheets tf neceasalt~Uons under public review. List aIi neighboring property li of the City of Dublin to notify surrounding property owners of pend'ng PP res of lists are encouraged. tt is the po'cy based on the County Auditors current tax Gst. Electronic cop' owners within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property C17Y/STATE/Z1P CODE MAILING ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) Please see attached list Page 3 of 5 ~~ Vi. VII. VIII. roe b re resentatives are essential to process thisdesaribed in ties AUTHOR iIZAn ION~~edlbelTMowEt eR b yauQroTMrizes Cit)r re tpresentativpes t vyfsn Photograph and post a notice on the property OwnerlApp appilcaUon. , vrde essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid UTILITY DISCLAIMER' The City of Dublin will make every effort to pro ' of Dublin and surrounding vicinities has stretched the City's capadty to provide these services to the ilmit As such. ttre City o growth of the City licant until some further date. The Owner/Applicant ackrroNriedges the Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the app approval of this request for Coning Dub er ~Ibit~n able t pro deoes~sentAfalservices such a~water andCsewer faalities when needed byrthe said binding commitment that the rty OwnerlApplicant. _ __ -_._.. ...T~nwr. rr.t~ mriinn must be Completed PROPERTY OWNEtuE-rru~•+~• ~ ~••, •,...._ ---- Current Properly Owner/Applicant• Avvlied Innovation, Inc. Mailing Add State, zip Code) 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016 (Street. City. Fax: Daytime Telephone: Email or Attemate Contad Information: page 4 of 5 ___ i 1 e r rCSC~no~...~• Attach additional sheets for m IX. REPRESENTATIVES OF OWNER: Please C0m ~~ ~ a cable gmith & Hale Representative: Nicholas C. Cavalaris / anent ArchR pe5 ner Corttracttx etc. Ohio 43215 Suite 725, Columbus, ~pingAddress: 37 W. Broad Street, , (Street, CRY. State. Zip Code) Fax; 221-4409 pay8me Telephone: 221-4255 Email or pltemate Contact Information: Y CONTACT PERSON for this application? Nicholas C . Cavalaris Who is the PRIAAAR TION FOR OWNER'S AGENTIREPRESENTATNE S :Please com fete if a livable. This section must be notarized. X, AUTHORIZA ,the owner, hereby authorize Authorization on file with Cit to ad as my representative(s) in all 1 ..:..,~~ ~riinn modifying the project. 1 agree to be bound by all representations a rocessirxl and approval of this appn~u~~•• ^^~--__ ° - matters pertaining to the p resentative. agreements made by the designated rep Date: Signature of CurteM Property owner. day of Subsuibed and swom to before me this 20 Slate of Notary Public County of X APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be com feted and notarized. ' ~ owner or authorized representative, have read and ~~~ lication, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all Nicholas C. Cavalaris I iigtion The information contained in this app - the contents of this apP to the best of my knowledge and belief. respects true and correct, Date: 11/1/05 Signature of owner a `%~~~~~ ~/, 0 -L- Authorised Represe~Uva: ~i/~'~ ~. , 20 0 i ~ ~ -,,~..._ day of Subscribed and swom to before me this I State of ~L" ~ ~~~ ~ `~c c u.,,1/~~~. ,,, Notary Pt~lic County of ,~'~ s ~~~~~L~~ DAV1D L pTDL~AW ATTORNEY -_-- ~~,..~ NOTE: THE PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON WILL RECENE Page 5 of 5 ~~ ~. JOSEPH ~. TESTA NKLIN FRA COUNTY AUDITOR DATE OCT 31 , 2005 MAp AREA : d 1 h _ 1~ ~ .. ~% ~.~ I I J ~ ~ ~ 1 . ~~ -- ~•~ G i - ~ I 1 ~-- . '>. a I •4 L ' , -- .• . ~'; r-------- ~_- -- _ ~' - ---------- - , '' ~ ~ ~ I u 1 ~ .. ~ , ,~~ .i ~ r -J.~ i •i% - ~• ' ' i I ' ~ ' - l A. ~ ~ ` ~: • . . . ~ I ' ~ - ~ ~` ` ` I ' ' I i ~ l ~ - ~~ I ~ ~~ • I I ; ° ~ ~- ~ i~ M ~~ 1 ~ / i I 1 J . • I I ~ I ~ ' ~ • ! • qqB I j i ; ~ Li I I I i ` ~ ~,, I` ~ ~' • • i1 :~ 1, -r-Y •.._.__~ } i r I i i I 'II ~- % f% i' 1 - ~ i r j J ,~ .•. i r~ i. __ ~ I ~ ' i ,. i ~ .. ,,, . ~ _ ,., __ - ~ ., _ ~ --- ~ ®' ~ 1 ~ DISCLAIMER inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, is repored for the real property ore notified that the public primary This map P survey plots and other public records and data. Users of this meP information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this mop. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsiblities for the information contained on this moP• Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies. it SCALE 1' _ ~400 cx+o NpRTt GIS ~9n1 ~F ~. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER Schoedinger Funeral Service 229 East State Street Columbus, OH 43215 Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. Arin: Tom Johnson 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, OH 43215 Applied Innovation Inc. 5800 Innovation Drive Dublin, OH 43016 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Duke Realty Ohio 600 East 96~' Street, Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46240 ATTORNEY Nicholas C. Cavalaris Smith & Hale 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725 Columbus, OH 43215 R & A Properties P.O. Box 8100 Dublin, OH 43016 F:Docs~s&hlabe1s~20051schoedinger l .lbl (10/31/OS-ncp) ZONIIVG DESCRIPTION 8.741 ACRES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, located in Virginia Military District Survey Number 3011, being all of the 3.641 acre tract conveyed to Applied Innovation Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 34725 D10, all of the 5.00 acre tract conveyed to Applied Innovation Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 27063 C02, and part of the 14.803 acre tract conveyed to Applied Innovation Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 2973 A07, said 8.741 acres being more particularly bounded and descnbed as follows: Beginning, at the point of intersection of the northerly right-of--way line of Innovation Drive and the westerly right-of--way line of Emerald Parkway, as delineated on the plat for "Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive Right-of--Way and Permanent Easements Dedication Plat, a plat of record in Plat Book 86 Page 24; Thence with the northerly right-of-way line of said Innovation Drive, the following courses and distances; North 77° 08' 08" West, a distance of 376.01 feet, to a point; thence with a curve to the right, having a central angle of 23° 09' 00", a radius of 716.00 feet, an arc length of 289.29 feet, and a chord which bears North 65° 02' 49" West, a chord distance of 287.33 feet to a point; North 52° 53' 33" West, a distance of 167.32 feet, to a point; Thence with the perimeter of said 3.641 and 5.00 acre tracts the following courses and distances North 36° 13' 22" East, a distance of 490.12 feet, to a point; South 84° 29' 11" East, a distance of 159.94 feet, to a point; South OS° 23' 34" West, a distance of 97.08 feet, to a point; South 86° 15' 49" East, a distance of 126.10 feet, to a point; South 86° 15' 47" East, a distance of 138.73 feet, to a point; South 41° 08' 08" East, a distance of 216.35 feet, to a point in the westerly right-of--way line of said Emerald Parkway; Thence with the westerly right-of--way line of said Emerald Parkway, the following courses and distances; South OS° 12' 25" West, a distance of 265.72 feet, to a point; South 07° 34' 39" West, a distance of 115.05 feet, to a point; South 56° 49' 42" West, a distance of 55.54 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 8.741 acres more or less. This description was prepared from existing records and is not to be used for dced transfer. EVANS, b~CHWART, HAMBLETON AND TILTON, INC. ~wrn~~os PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SCHOEDINGER FUNERAL SERVICES Innovation Drive /Emerald Parkway Revised January 20, 2006 Introduction The site is approximately 8.8~ acres and zoned Restricted Industrial ("RI"). It is located northwest of the intersection of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway. The property is intended for development in two subareas. Subarea A will consist of a funeral home, a reception center, and a remembrance garden. Subarea B shall consist of suburban office uses totaling 32,000 square feet. The proposed uses are appropriate for this location due to the development patterns of adjacent properties and the proximity of State Routes 33 and 161 and the Interstate 270 freeway interchanges. Upon approval of this rezoning application, the owner and/or applicant shall have five (5) years from the effective date of this rezoning to have a final development plan approved. Subarea A Funeral Home and Reception Center A1.01 Description and Acreage: Subarea A is approximately 4.4~ acres. Subarea A may contain a funeral home, a reception center, and a remembrance garden. A1.02 Permitted Uses: 1. Subarea A may contain the following uses: a funeral home; a reception center, used in conjunction with the funeral home; and a remembrance garden. A crematory shall not be permitted on site. The reception center may be used for private receptions and by users including but not limited to: business associations, professional membership organizations, labor organizations, civic, social and fraternal associations, political organizations, charitable organizations, and nonprofit membership organizations. The remembrance garden will be located in the vicinity of the reception center and is designed to be a passive park-like setting which may include a path and benches. A remembrance garden shall conform to all licensing requirements and municipal regulations. A1.03 Permitted Density: Two buildings shall be located in this subarea and total building coverage shall be approximately 14,700 square feet. The funeral home shall be approximately 11,700 square feet and the recepti~~e~s~1 ~vE D approximately 3,000 square feet. ~ia 1 ~J~N x ~ 200fi l~ ~.- a~ ~ CITY OF DUBLIN 1 ~ LAND USE & LONG RANGE PLANNING A1.04 Traffic and Circulation: 1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive as approved by the city engineer. 2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan based on a traffic /access study and approval by the city engineer. The Innovation Drive curb cuts shown on the Preliminary Development Plan shall be full access. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the city engineer and may serve both subareas. 3. The westernmost curb cut on Innovation Drive shall be permitted as needed to serve future land development to the west with the approval of the city engineer. 4. This subarea shall comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study prepared by Trans Associates Engineering Consultants, Inc. subject to approval by the city engineer. 5. The applicant agrees to contribute its proportionate share to signalization or other intersection improvements as determined by the city engineer. A1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance with Dublin City Code. A1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks from Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement areas. 2. Building setbacks from Emerald Parkway and from Innovation Drive shall be a minimum of 100 feet. 3. There shall be a zero parking/paving setback and a 20 foot building setback from the property line dividing Subarea A and Subarea B. 4. The reception center shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet from the north property line. 5. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea A. 2 A1.07 Height Requirements: 1. The maximum height of all buildings shall be 38 feet. A1.08 Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials. A1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas: 1. No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. 2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be enclosed or not visible from the street or adjoining property. 3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shall be screened from all streets or adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination thereof. A1.10 Landscaping: 1. Landscaping shall be in accordance with Dublin City Code. The northern environs of the proposed pond nearest the north property line shall assume a naturalistic design direction. The intent is to tie this part of the site with the stream corridor to the north making a seamless transition to the developed site. The use of indigenous plant materials, including trees, shrubs and perennials will constitute the plant pallet. On the southern edge of this northern pond along with the pond at the intersection of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway, ornamental trees grouped with flowering shrubs and perennials will be arranged to create informal, causal planting beds. A lawn will run to the edge of the pond where no planting beds are planned. 2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed and/or maintained along the Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive frontage as depicted on the attached Landscape Plan. The landscape buffer will be compatible with existing developments and approved plans along Emerald Parkway. 3. Plant material when installed shall meet the following minimum size requirements as follows: a. Deciduous trees 2-inch caliper minimum b. Evergreen trees 6-foot height minimum c. Ornamental trees 1 '/2 inch caliper minimum or 6-foot height minimum d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum 4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected during construction with tree preservation fencing the type of fencing to be coordinated with city development staff and indicated at the Final Development Plan stage. 5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. Al.ll Architecture: The architecture and color palette will be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors,,irf~ ' will be submitted\ ith the final development plan. ~~-,~ 2. Building materials shall consist of: a. Brick, stone veneer, or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone detailing. b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or dimensional asphalt shingles with no less than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used. c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer. 3. Roof: a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 6/12 or greater. b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required. c. Flat fs are perms ed provided th are proportionately i egrated with para s that ade tely screen mec 'cal rooftop equip ent. 4 4. Scale: a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the landscape. b. The scale of each building shall be aided through the use of articulated building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and other architectural elements that help break up the building mass and scale. 5. Wall Articulation/Fenestration: a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. b. The amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the amount of solid facade. A1.12 Signage and Graphics: All signage shall use muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural style of the building. Since Subarea A has frontage along two roadways, two (2) monument signs and directional signage shall be permitted for the funeral home. One (1) monument sign shall be externally illuminated and located at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive and one (1) monument sign shall be externally illuminated and located along Emerald Parkway toward the northern edge of Subarea A. Directional signage shall be located at the Innovation Drive entrance. Manufacturer specification sheets shall be provided at the time of the Final Development Plan. Subarea B Office B1.01 Description and Acreage: 1. Subarea B is approximately 4.4~ acres. Subarea B shall be comprised of suburban office type uses totaling 32,000 square feet. The architectural style shall be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan which is to the south of the site. B1.02 Permitted Uses: Subarea B shall include those uses listed in Dublin City Code Section 153.025, Suburban Office and Institutional District. B1.03 Permitted Density: 1. The maximum permitted density shall be 32,000 square feet. B1.04 Traffic and Circulation: 1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive. 2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. Said curb cuts shall be full access. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the city engineer. 3. The westernmost Innovation Drive access shall provide shared access to the property to the west to accommodate future development of that tract. 4. The easternmost Innovation Drive access shall be shared between Subarea A and Subarea B. 5. This subarea shall comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study prepared by Trans Associates Engineering Consultants, Inc. subject to approval by the city engineer. B1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance with the Dublin City Code. B1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks from Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement areas. 2. Building setbacks from Innovation Drive%~~rtH~a 10 25efeehu on a ~ royal of b4~ ti~~ ~e~s -r-~,~ r rr the Final Development Plan. 3. The minimum side yard shall be zero for parking and 20 feet for buildings at the east property line and a 25 foot building setback and a shared access at the west property line. 4. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea B. 5. The applicant agrees to contribute its proportionate share to signalization or other intersection improvements as determined by the city engineer. 6 B1.07 Height Requirements: 1. The maximum height of all buildings shall be 38 feet. B1.08 Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials. B1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas: I . No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. ~i ~y ~~ 2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be encYosed of not visible from the street 3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shall be screened from all streets or adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination thereof. B1.10 Landscaping: 1. Landscaping shall be similar to the approved Thomas / Kohler plan to the south of the site in accordance with Dublin City Code and a plan will be submitted with the final development plan. 2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed along the Innovation Drive frontage as depicted on the attached Landscape Plan. 3. Plant material shall be installed with minimum size requirements as follows: a. Deciduous trees b. Evergreen trees c. Ornamental trees 2-inch caliper minimum 6-foot height minimum 1 '/2 inch caliper minimum or 6-foot height minimum d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum 7 4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected during construction with tree preservation fencing the type of fencing to be coordinated with city development staff and indicated at the Final Development Plan stage. 5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. ~ B1.11 Architecture: The architecture and color palette will be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors iii b ~\ a will be submitted~with the final development plan. J/ c~~rv V ~ ~ 2. Building materials shall consist of: a. Brick, stone veneer, or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone detailing. b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or dimensional asphalt shingles with no less than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used. c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer. 3. Roof: a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 6/12 or greater. b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required. c. t roofs are fitted prove d they are p ortionately i grated with arapets that equately scr n mechanica oftop equip ent. 4. Scale: a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the landscape. b. The scale of each building shall be aided through the use of articulated building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and 8 other architectural elements that help break up the building mass and scale. 5. Wall Articulation/Fenestration: a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. b. The amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the amount of solid facade. B1.12 Signage and Graphics: 1. All signage shall be externally illuminated, shall use muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural style of the buildings. Manufacturer specification sheets shall be provided at the time of the final development plan. F:Docs\schoedinger.txt (1/20/06-ncp) (8) word 9 II ~'~~C~ ©RAFT 8. Rezoning - OS-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive Jamie Adkins presented slides and highlighted the staff report. She said this site, zoned RI, Restricted Industrial District, is at the northwest corner of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway. Surrounding the site are parcels in the Thomas-Kohler PCD. Ms. Adkins said the proposed plan includes Subarea A, for an 11,700- square-foot funeral home and 3,000-square-foot reception center, and Subarea B is for a maximum of 32,000 square feet of office use. She said the access point is shown on Emerald Parkway as discussed at the Concept Plan. She said the applicant has agreed to eliminate the curb cut and that has been added as a condition. Ms. Adkins said a shared, main access drive would be on Innovation Drive, between both Subareas. Retention ponds are shown at the corner of the site and at the rear along the creek floodplain. Ms. Adkins said the development text indicates natural materials will be used in addition to coordination with surrounding area architecture for the proposed elevations. She said staff suggests a condition that the applicant continues to work with them to further refine the architecture to coordinate with the surrounding buildings. Ms. Adkins said in an effort to develop way finding for this site, staff has worked with the applicant to propose new signs. One sign will be at the corner of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive facing the intersection at an angle and another further north on Emerald Parkway to help southbound Emerald Parkway traffic to turn on Innovation Drive. She said this Subarea is permitted two signs per Code. The applicant is requesting that they be on the same road frontage with the addition of some identifying directional signage at the entrance on Innovation Drive. Ms. Adkins said staff recommends approval of this rezoning application with eight conditions as listed in the staff report: 1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway; 2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material; 3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional; 4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic architecture for the development; 5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and Flood Control Ordinances; 6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the floodway + 20 feet on the plans; 7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and based on the traffic study; and 8) That the site complies with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject to approval by the City Engineer. CITY OF DUBLIN.. lad Use aad Lag Rage Planing 5800 Shier-Rings Road "''°'"ia, Ohio 43016-123b e: 614-410-4600 ~t~~614-410-4747 Weh Site: www.dubNa.oh.us PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 5, 2006 ~~ ~ ~ I~R M~flNG 4M S~L~~~'_. The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 8. Rezoning - OS-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive Location: 8.8 acres located on the west side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Existing Zoning: RI, Restricted Industrial District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District under the provisions of Section 153.050. Proposed Use: A funeral home and office development. Applicant: Applied Innovation, 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016; represented by Nick Cavalaris, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-4644/Email: jadkins@dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To approve this Rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan) because the proposal will provide a needed funeral service and additional high quality office space, the plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Community Plan, and the plan complies with the review criteria of the Planned Districts, with 14 conditions: Conditions: 1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway; 2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material; 3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional; 4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic architecture for the development; 5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and Flood Control Ordinances; 6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the floodway + 20 feet on the plans; 7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and based on the traffic study; Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 5, 2006 8. Rezoning - OS-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive (Continued) 8) That the site comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 9) That the text be revised to include language that will allow for flexibility in the building setbacks in Subarea B; 10) That the text be revised to state that all refuse will be fully screened; 11) That the text be revised to state that the scale of each building shall be aided through the use of articulated building elements; 12) That the text be revised to remove the reference to tree protection snow fencing and that a stronger fencing be included at the final development plan stage; 13) That the text be revised to state that all signage shall be externally illuminated; and 14) 'That the text be revised to state that the maximum height of all buildings shall be 38 feet. * Nick Cavalaris, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6 - 0. RESULT: This Rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan) application was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATI N -L, ~ /~~ amie Fes'""Adkins, Planner Page 2 of 2 Draft P&Z Minutes O~~ Page 2 Nick Cavalaris, Smith and Hale, representing the applicant presented renderings of a revised site plan. He said they had worked with staff for approximately two years on this project to find a site for this unique, first use for Dublin. He said they had numerous meeting with the Division of Engineering discussing the access to Emerald Parkway. He said Dublin staff was adamant about not allowing the Emerald Parkway curbcut. He said they believed since the address is Emerald Parkway for ease of reference for visitors, the curb cut was needed. Mr. Cavalaris said the applicant thought it worked now by tweaking the site plan. He pointed out that even though they had an Emerald Parkway address, it will not have a curbcut on that road. Mr. Cavalaris said with that particular curbcut and with the way the building is situated on the site; it presents a few signage challenges. He said the Code permits two signs because the site has two frontages on two roads. He requested that the Commission allow two signs along the Emerald footage, one on the northern edge, south of the floodway. Mr. Cavalaris said staff would like to have the monument sign because of the way the building is angled towards the intersection facing to the southeast to make a more dramatic impact on the site, which presents the signage challenge. He said the funeral home has elderly patrons and visitors, and for locating the business, it is essential to have a sign for the southbound traffic on Emerald Parkway. By getting rid of the curbcut, we need the signage to direct people to Innovation Drive because Emerald Parkway has more of a presence than Innovation Drive in Dublin. Rick Gerber said the signage request made sense. However, as per the previous discussion tonight by the Commissioners, he liked external illumination of signs. He said signage could be a final development issue. He said that "Serving families since 1855 " was advertising and he asked that the sign be cleaned up slightly so that it can be made more visible. Mr. Saneholtz agreed that the tag line should be removed. Ms. Boring also preferred externally illuminated signage. She said she thought it added more class to the very respectable business. Mr. Gerber said he thought the applicant listened intently as to the Commission's feedback a few months ago with the Concept Plan and addressed the issues. Mr. Zimmerman asked why the Innovation Drive entrance signs would have the Schoedinger name on them. Randy Schoedinger, the applicant said it was for visitors to locate the funeral home because of the shared access. Mr. Gerber said since the entrance was not on Emerald Parkway, perhaps it was needed. Mr. Zimmerman agreed, but suggested the size of the Schoedinger text be modified and muted on the signage. He said it seemed to be more of a marketing tool than for identification. He said it was also the entrance for all the office buildings too. Draft P&Z Minutes ~RA~ Page 3 Mr. Gerber pointed out that the entrance signage could be approved at the final development stage. Ms. Boring asked if an address change to Innovation Drive had been considered since the building was angled on the site. Mr. Gerber said the Emerald Parkway would help people understand and the signs would guide them to the entrance. Mr. Schoedinger said staff requested that they have an Innovation Drive address. He said Innovation Drive is not well known outside Dublin. He said to add to the confusion is that Emerald Parkway has Columbus and Dublin addresses. He said that was another reason for identification signage. Ms. Boring said she realized that office-building setbacks were being addressed at this time, however, she asked about having the buildings at the roadway with the parking behind it. She said when the setbacks were identified in the text now, that possibility is being eliminated for future development. She asked how that could be addressed now. Ms. Adkins said alternatives could be discussed, and if it were the staff could look at alternatives if it were the Commissions desire to see those kinds of setbacks. She suggested that the applicant would like to add a condition, if possible to allow some flexibility in the text for more design alternatives. Ms. Boring did not want the Commission stuck in this mode. She said setbacks are still being worked on and refined and when this area is developed, she would like that. She said she did not like the text to be that firm on this particular point for the office buildings. She asked for something more creative. Mr. Gerber asked that traffic flow be kept in mind. Ms. Adkins suggested a condition that the text be revised to include language regarding design of the offices to allow for different setbacks. Mr. Gerber said he would still like to retain the flexibility. Ms. Boring agreed said she would like the text to be amended to include that flexibility. Ms. Boring referred to page 7 of the text where it stated that the garbage should be enclosed or not visible. She asked if it is required that all garage be enclosed. She asked that the words "or not visible from..." be deleted because she would like it all enclosed or screened. Ms. Boring suggested that as a condition. Ms. Boring referred to page 5-B of the text, and requested that the word can be deleted and replaced with shall be inserted in the sentence that begins: The scale of each building can be aided. Ms. Boring also requested that on page 5, it read: ...break up the building mass and/or Draft P&Z Minutes (GRAFT Page 4 scale... because "other architectural elements" has been added, it doesn't state they have to use the stated elements, but it states that they will use some elements. Ms. Boring said that also applied to the office text on scale to change accordingly, the same way. Ms. Boring referred to page 4, point 4, Healthy Trees of the text and said she had a problem with snow fencing which she thought had been addressed at one time. She asked for a definition of snow fencing. Ms. Adkins said snow fencing was the orange construction fencing. Ms. Boring said too many cases had been seen where the snow fencing is ignored. She recalled it had been changed to something more substantial. Ms. Adkins recalled that at one time, chain link fencing was discussed. Ms. Boring asked about wood fencing that rolled out. Mr. Gerber recalled wood fencing was done at Belvedere because there was a tree row that needed added protection because of its age and nature of the trees. Ms. Boring said to protect the applicant; she would like the fencing to be stronger and to not do the orange plastic fencing. Ms. Adkins said it could be changed. Mr. Gerber asked that it be "if needed." Mr. Gerber understood that Ms. Boring wanted this because she was afraid some construction group would knock down trees they should not. Ms. Adkins clarified that Ms. Boring would like the text modified to require wood snow fencing or wooden fencing. Ms. Boring said she did not care what type of wood fencing. However, she did not want the pliable plastic fencing that is easily ignored and in bad storms blown over. She wanted something sturdier. Mr. Gerber asked if the text was the place to address the fencing. Ms. Wanner said probably not. She said staff had discussed protective fencing with the Landscape Inspectors. She said there was a very heavily wooded sight and staff agreed that the snow fencing would not work. She said the inspectors said other than using chain link fence, a bulldozer or backhoe can back over any type of fencing unless there is some posting to reinforce it. Mr. Gerber recalled that a condition regarding the fencing was made for the Belvedere case. Draft P&Z Minutes DRAFT Page 5 Ms. Boring asked that the protective fencing be taken out of the text and be made as a condition. Mr. Gunderman suggested that a condition on the final development plan would be an appropriate place. Mr. Gerber agreed. He requested that staff look into it and see what was done before. Ms. Boring suggested that the final development plan condition be to eliminate number 4 as part of the zoning text and consider it as a condition. Ms. Boring referred to page 4: Architecture 3-C: Flat roofs are permitted, and asked if that was something wanted. She asked if they do them, would it look okay. Mr. Gerber said it was okay. Ms. Boring said in regards to signage and graphics which is 1, she asked if "in the text" needed to be added, or should it be made a condition that it be externally illuminated. Ms. Adkins said if all the Commissioners agreed, then it should be in the text. Ms. Boring said she would like that as a condition. Ms. Boring strongly supported staff's comment that the cupola does not add to the stateliness of what she saw. She said it downgraded the building, making her think (as a consumer) of a barn and it did not fit because the building is as stately as it was. Mr. Gerber said he thought the cupola looked great and carried the southwest swimming pool theme. Mr. Zimmerman agreed with Ms. Boring. Mr. Gerber conceded and said to have the applicant to fix it. Mr. Cavalaris responded to Ms. Boring's comment about the cupola and said that it matched the look of their other buildings and that was the reason for it. Ms. Boring said she did not identify Schoedinger Funeral Home with the cupola at all. She repeated that she did not think it fitted into this area whatsoever. She said she strongly agreed with Ms. Adkins' staff report. Mr. Saneholtz referred to page 2 of the staff report, under requirements: The average height of structures shall be... He asked if the word maximum is generally used. Ms. Adkins agreed with Mr. Saneholtz. She said she thought they were attempting to say was the way Dublin measures it is to the midpoint or average part of the eave. She said that could be clarified. Draft P&Z Minutes DRAFT Page 6 Mr. Saneholtz noted that the words average height appeared in A and B in the text and the word maximum should be added. Mr. Saneholtz referred to page 3 regarding deciduous trees where a two inch minimum caliper was mentioned. He recalled a three inch caliper being discussed to get the trees further along. Mr. Gunderman said if they did, they would like to change back to two-inch trees. He said most of the time; atwo-inch caliper was about right. Ms. Adkins added that was more than Code required. Mr. Gunderman said three-inch caliper trees would not grow immediately because it takes more time to root and by that time, a two inch would have caught up in caliper. Mr. Saneholz said this was a nice facility. Ms. Boring agreed with the comment made by Mr. Saneholtz. Mr. Zimmerman also agreed. Ms. Adkins read new Conditions 9 through 13. Mr. Gerber said new Condition 14 addresses the signage. Ms. Boring asked if the cupola would be addressed in the revision of Condition 4. Mr. Gerber said it was already included. Mr. Calvalaris agreed to the conditions as listed below in the motion. Mr. Gerber moved for approval of this Rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan) because the proposal will provide a needed funeral service and additional high quality office space, the plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Community Plan, and the plan complies with the review criteria of the Planned Districts, with 14 conditions: 1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway; 2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material; 3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional; 4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic architecture for the development; 5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and Flood Control Ordinances; 6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the floodway + 20 feet on the plans; Draft P&Z Minutes ~R~~ Page 7 7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and based on the traffic study; 8) That the site comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject to approval by the City Engineer; 9) That the text be revised to include language that will allow for flexibility in the building setbacks in Subarea B; 10) That the text be revised to state that all refuse will be fully screened; 11) That the text be revised to state that the scale of each building shall be aided through the use of articulated building elements; 12) That the text be revised to remove the reference to tree protection snow fencing and that a stronger fencing be included at the final development plan stage; 13) That the text be revised to state that all signage shall be externally illuminated; and 14) That the text be revised to state that the maximum height of all buildings shall be 38 feet. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Messineo, yes; Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 6-0.) Mr. Gerber thanked everyone for their time. STAFF REPORT DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JANUARY 5, 2006 CITY OF DUBLIN_ land Use and Long Range Planning Sa90 Shier-Rings Road din, Ohio 43016-1236 ne:6l4-410-4b00 Fax: 614-410-4147 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us 8. Rezoning - OS-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home - 6055 Emerald Parkway Location: 8.8 acres located on the west side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Existing Zoning: RI, Restricted Industrial District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District under the provisions of Section 153.053. Proposed Use: An 11,000-square-foot funeral home with a 3,000-square-foot reception center, and a 32,000-square-foot office development. Applicant: Applied Innovation, 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016; represented by Nick Cavalaris, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-4644/Email: jadkins@dublin.oh.us. BACKGROUND: Case Summary: The concept plan was heard at City Council on December 12, 2005, and at the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 6, 2005. The main issue discussed at both meetings regarded the traffic impacts of the proposed uses on the road network, and the applicants request for a right-in/right-out entrance on Emerald Parkway. The Commission specifically requested more information regarding this issue and that the applicant work with staff to resolve the access issues. The Commission suggested that the applicant meet with the residents and increase the protection of the stream corridor. The Commission also recommended improvements to the design of the office area and its density. The applicant has worked with staff to resolve these issues and staff recommends approval with conditions. Case Procedure: The purpose of the PUD process is generally similar to the previous process, in that it encourages imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The new PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment); Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 2 of 7 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves/denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves/denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be returned to City Council for a public hearing and final vote. Atwo-thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. Review Criteria: In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non-conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11)Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 3 of 7 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standazds of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure aze consistent with the Thoroughfaze Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. CONSIDERATIONS: Site Characteristics: • Site Description. The 8.8-acre site has frontage along Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. The site is currently undeveloped with some large mature tree stands and undergrowth and a stream along the northern property line. This site is located in the southwest area of Dublin, with good visibility along Emerald Parkway. Zoning. The site is currently zoned RI, Restricted Industrial District. The current zoning permits manufacturing and industrial uses, and office as a conditional use. The proposed use for a funeral home and office complex is not permitted within this district and therefore a rezoning is necessary. To the west and south is vacant land zoned RI. To the north is an AEP facility zoned RI and land to the east is currently zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, and also vacant. Community Plan: • Future Land Use. The Future Land Use Map in the Community Plan shows this site as "Office." Land use designations were assigned based on comprehensive traffic studies for the City. The proposed uses of funeral home and office aze consistent with the Future Land Use plan. Site Layout: • General Layout. The proposal is divided into two Subazeas. Subarea A on the eastern portion of the site includes an approximately 11,700-square-foot funeral home building with an adjacent 3,000-square-foot reception center building. Subarea B on the western portion of the site, includes a group of office buildings with a maximum square footage of 32,000 squaze feet. • Subarea A. The funeral home in Subarea A is proposed at the intersection of Emerald Pazkway and Innovation Drive. The funeral home is proposed at an angle to the intersection in order to create a more interesting street aesthetic. The Subarea plan indicates a reception center in association with the funeral home adjacent to the 2.5-acre stormwater pond. Parking for the funeral home facility is proposed generally on the north and west sides of the building. An additional stormwater pond is proposed at the southeast corner of the site. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 4 of 7 Subarea B. The office buildings are proposed along Innovation Drive, west of the funeral home. A large pond is proposed to the north of the office buildings, along the creek area. The parking will generally be south of the buildings. Development Standards: Permitted Uses and Density. The proposed development text outlines the permitted uses for the site by Subarea. Subarea A includes funeral home uses with no embalming or cremating services, and a reception center with a remembrance garden. The total maximum square footage for this Subarea is 14,700 square feet for a density of 3,340 square feet per acre. Subarea B includes the uses permitted in SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District and will have a maximum total square footage of 32,000 square feet for a density of 7,272 square feet per acre. • Reception Center and Remembrance Garden. The reception center is intended for private receptions associated with the funeral home; however, it may also be reserved for various types of civic, business, and nonprofit organizations. The proposed remembrance garden will be located close to the reception center and will be a small passive space with benches and a walking path. • Setbacks. The proposed setbacks are based on the existing right-of--way and are indicated as 25 feet for pavement and 100 feet for buildings on Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive for both Subareas. The text indicates a zero pavement setback for the shared driveway between the two Subareas. The setback for the reception center is 50 feet from the north property line and the lot coverage maximum is 70 percent for both Subareas. This is consistent with surrounding planned districts. Landscaping. The proposed text indicates that the site will include a naturalized pond along the stream corridor with indigenous plant materials. The text states that both ponds, including the pond at the southeast corner of the site will have ornamental trees and flowering shrubs in groupings to create an informal planting. Landscape Buffer. The text also includes a 25-foot landscape buffer along Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive that will coordinate with existing landscape treatments on Emerald Parkway. Further detail will be required at the final development plan. The remaining landscaping will meet or exceed Code as outlined in the text. Parking. The text indicates that parking shall meet Code. Traffic: Traffic Study. A traffic impact study has been submitted to the City. The applicant will be responsible for re-striping the center lane on Innovation Drive to allow left-hand turns into the site at the shared access point for Subarea A and B. When Subarea B is built, the applicant for that project will have to re-stripe Innovation Drive for alert-hand turn lane at the western property line. • Signalization Warrant/Intersection Improvements. The traffic impact study did not include a signal warrant analysis based on the minimal intersection impacts derived from the study. Staff is working with the applicant to create a supplemental study that will determine if the site generated traffic will cause a signal warrant and require the installation of a traffic signal at the Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway intersection, or if other intersection improvements are needed. If a warrant is not met, the applicant is looking at the proposed developments in the area to determine if, and when warrants may Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 5 of 7 possibly be met or what other intersection improvements may be needed. As a result, the City Engineer will determine if the applicant will need to contribute to the signal installation or other intersection improvements and what percentage is the applicant's responsibility. The Applicant needs to continue to finalize this supplement to the traffic impact study to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • Access Management. The approved and constructed roadway plans do not allow for a curb cut along Emerald Pazkway. Emerald Pazkway was built to be a minor arterial with controlled access points. Extensive research and forethought went into the design of Emerald Pazkway to ensure traffic flow is optimal. The traffic study submitted does not show that the curb cut will benefit the roadway system and therefore, the City Engineer is not inclined to allow a curb cut on this road. The applicant has agreed that the access on Emerald Pazkway is not necessary for their operations and staff requests that this access be eliminated from all plans. • Private Streets. Pavement within the parking areas should meet the City Engineer's requirements for strength and durability. Turning movements of waste hauling and emergency vehicles must be accounted for in designing curves and turning radii. Private drives should be a minimum of 22-feet wide (this is our standard for drive aisles in pazking lots). Utilities: • Water Supply. There is a 16" waterline on the west side of Emerald Pazkway and a 12" waterline on the North side of Innovation. The applicant is indicating that they will utilize the water main on the north side of Innovation Drive. • Sanitary Sewer Service. A 21" sanitary sewer runs long the north side of the creek that borders the northern property line of this property. The applicant is indicating that they will tie into this line to service both Subazeas. • Stormwater Management. The project will be required to meet the requirements of the Stormwater Regulations. A portion of the site is located in the Cosgray Creek watershed of the Stormwater Master Plan and a very small portion is in the Cramer Creek Watershed. The applicant has not submitted preliminary calculations, however, water features aze shown on the plan, which may be providing Stormwater controls. Staff recommends that the applicant meet with the Division of Engineering to discuss Stormwater management on the site. The plans show that the pond at the corner of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway is partially in a utility easement, this will have to be eliminated from the easement. • Floodplain. The property has a substantial creek running along the northern property line with associated Floodplain. The applicant will need to comply with the Flood Control Ordinance. The pond towards the northern property line is shown in the Floodway + 20 feet and will have to be moved out of that area. Architecture: • Architecture. The proposed text indicates that the architecture and color palette will be similar to the Thomas Kohler PCD and will consist of earth tones and muted natural tones and materials. The text also states that the scale of the buildings will be aided by the use of porticos, dormers, recesses, awnings and other elements to break up the massing of the building. The applicant has submitted preliminary architecture for the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 6 of 7 funeral home and reception center. Staff believes that the proposed architecture begins to address the intent of the text and incorporates the required design elements such as porticos, dormers, and natural earth tone materials. However, the architecture includes some Colonial-type architectural design elements, including a cupola with a bell, that do not coordinate with the style of surrounding developments. Staff does not believe that a bell is appropriate for this azea in such close proximity to residents. Staff believes that the proposed site is a prominent location and should utilize dramatic and striking architecture. Staff believes that the funeral building should utilize varied roof pitches and massing to create a more interesting and impressive facade at the intersection. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to create high quality signature azchitecture throughout the development. • Architectural Materials. The proposed materials in the text include stone with limestone detailing, wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials used as accents with brick or stone veneer. The applicant has not listed brick as a permitted building material and staff recommends that the text be revised to include brick. Roofing materials are indicated as standing seam, cedar shake, or asphalt shingles. Staff recommends that the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional. Signage: Proposed Signs. The site is permitted by Code to have one sign in Subarea B, and two signs in Subarea A. The applicant is proposing that all signage utilize muted colors and coordinate with the azchitecture. The text indicates that Subazea B Signage will meet Code. The two signs in Subazea A are required to face each right-of--way and be no closer than two-third the length of the longest street frontage, or 250 feet. The applicant is proposing that one monument sign shall be located on Emerald Parkway, toward the northern edge of Subarea A, and the other monument sign will generally be at the corner of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive, angled at the intersection. The proposed locations of these two signs are facing generally the same right-of--way and do not meet the minimum distance sepazation. The applicant contends that they will assist in way finding as because of the difficult southbound visibility on Emerald Parkway. The applicant is also proposing a directional sign along Innovation Drive indicating the location of the entrance and the Schoedinger name. This sign also does not meet Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed uses are consistent with the Community Plan, compatible with the surrounding development, have adequate services, and will create a needed service within the city. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to create high quality architecture, signage, gateway treatments, and refine the overall character of the development at the fmal development plan stage. Staff recommends approval of this preliminary development plan (rezoning) with eight conditions. Conditions: 1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway; 2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material; 3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -January 5, 2006 Page 7 of 7 Bases: 4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic architecture for the development; 5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and Flood Control Ordinances; 6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the floodway + 20 feet on the plans; 7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and based on the traffic study; and 8) That the site comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject to approval by the City Engineer. 1) The proposed project will provide a needed funeral service and additional high quality office space within the City. 2) The proposed development plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Dublin Community Plan. 3) This preliminary development plan generally complies with the review criteria outlined in Section 153.053 of the Zoning Code. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meetine __ OAYtON LEOAl BIAMC MK_iORMM ~0~4 -.. _ - t~fovemb2r2'1- 200`x- - -- ---~ggErl t3 ---~ - -- m confunction w Mayor Chinnici-~ 05. Vote on the am~ of cardi that exists toda _ If the middle ti program desire something diffe nt from this, the wou-d have tog to the respectiv parties and an endment to the agreem nts could be pro osed_ Mr_ Mc ash inquired ifs a is stating that t ese agreements ould have to be amended if a futur MTO wants to d something differ nt. Ms. S ay stated that th a would be thre years in which t determine that. he MTO down' yet exist. Mrs. ring stated that i the problem wit this agreement. The MTO down yet exist, yet th y are being limit without particip ling in a discuss n. Ms. lay responded t at the people wh understand the omplexities of th soccer world have ndicated the agr ements are satisf ctory. Mr. Clint n, who is an adv cafe for the mild tier program, h s so indicated. Mrs. oring responde that Mr. Clinton ated that a com romise was nec sary to achi ve agreement. May r Chinnici-Zuerc er inquired if Mr. cCash would li a to propose a lion. Mr. cCash respond d that a significa t amount of time as spent on thi discussion 18 mo the ago. He is s rprised that it too an extended pe iod of time to pr uce these agr ements. He mo ed that the third nd fourth semen es of Article 4 re arding the Mi dle Tier Program on page 5 of 8 b struck from the greement. That ould not limit th City in any way. M .Boring second d the motion. V to on the motion: Mr. Keenan, no; r. Reiner, no; ayor Chinnici-Zu rcher, no; Mr. M Cash, yes; Mr. cklider, no; Ms. alay, no; Mrs. B ring, yes. ayor Chinnici-Zu rcher reiterated t e other changes that Council me tiers have agree on: (1) In Articl 7, page two, ad "coaches" to #2; (2} in Article 7, a d the language t at Mr. Ortiz sug sled could be o tained by the La Director's offic (3) remove the uplication of the ord "program"; ( } in Article 4, se nd line from boom, delete the uptication of the ord, "programs; (5) in the same icle, replace th word "against" ill Mayor Chinnici 05. Vote on the an Mr_ Keenan, y Mayor Chinni i Vote on the e no; Mrs_ Bori c i Mayor Chin ci Vote on the e - ~-- ercher called th~ vote on the prodosed amendmert~s to Resolution 7~- ndments: Mrs. B ring, yes; Mr. K enan, yes; Mr. R iner, yes; Mayor 'r, yes; Mr. McC h, yes; Mr. Leck ider, yes; Ms. S ay, yes. '_uercher called t e vote on the pr posed amendm is to Resolution 9- •ndments: Mr. einer, yes; Ms. S lay, yes; Mayor hinnici-Zuerche ,yes; Mrs. Boring, y s; Mr_ Lecklider, es; Mr. McCas yes. 'uercher calle the vote on Res lution 78-OS as ended. olution: Mr_ K enan, yes; Mr. R iner, yes; Ms. S lay, yes; Mr_ Mc ash, yes; Mayor C innici-Zuercher, es; Mr_ Lecklider yes. Zuercher call d the vote on th Resolution 79-0 as amended. olution: Ms. alay, yes; Mr. M Cash, no; Mrs. ring, yes; Mayo >r, yes; Mr. L cklider, yes; Mr. eenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Resolutio 80-05 Appointin a Member tot a Architectural eview Board o the City of Dub n. Mr_ McCa ,Administrative Committee Chair introduced the r solution. He not d that Council h s interviewed ca didates to replac Richard Taylor, who resigned fr the Board. T e recommended andidate is Willi m Souders to fil the unexpired to of Richard ylor. He asked he Clerk to come t the language i the resolution t substitute "appoint "for "reappoint Vote on a Resolution: Salay, yes; Mr Lecklider, yes; r. McCash, yes; rs. Boring, yes; Ma r Chinnici-Zuer er, yes; Mr. Rei er, yes; Mr. Kee an, yes. l OTHER • Concept Ptan -Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Driv RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Minutes of _ _ °'~\ Ms_ Wanner stated that this is a concept for a funeral home located at Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive_ On October 6, Planning Commission reviewed the plan_ The main issues of discussion were the traffic impacts for the proposed uses on the road network and the applicant's request for a right in, right out access along Emerald Parkway. The applicant is seeking feedback from Council regarding the concept plan. She displayed aerials of the site. The site consists of 8.8 acres and some industrial uses surround the north haK of the site. There are some vacant parcels to the south and to the east of the site_ The northern portion includes a stream and some riparian vegetation. The site is zoned Restricted Industrial, as are surrounding sites to the north and south. There is a portion of land across Emerald Parkway that is zoned Planned Commercial District. The site plan includes 11,000 square feet of building, including a funeral home that is turned toward the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation and an associated reception center for use after funerals. There are also some office buildings shown to the west of the proposal, including four one-story buildings and one two-story building, for a total of 32,000 square feet of office area. The applicant has requested a right in, right out curb cut along Emerald Parkway. The City Engineer is reluctant to allow that curb cut, as the Emerald Parkway plans did not include that cut. Other comments at Planning Commission related to the density of the office subarea. Staff will be looking to cap this density somewhere close to 9,000 square feet per acre, consistent with other office developments in the City. She noted that staff has directed the applicant to pursue an access study in conjunction with the traffic study. Staff has encouraged the applicant to review the design of the office area as well as the density, and continue moving forward with the rezoning. The applicant is seeking comments and feedback from Council at this time. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked Ms. Wanner to identify the approximate location of the curb cut on the slide shown and asked about the distance of the curb cut from Innovation Drive. Ms_ Wanner stated that the curb cut is 240 feet from Innovation Drive. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked it staff is requesting that the applicant decrease the density. Ms. Wanner responded that staff has not requested that of the applicant at this time. Staff is seeking feedback from Council on the land use issue of a funeral home in This location and the curb cut locations. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher commented that she is pleased that the City of Dublin will finally have a funeral home in the community_ It has been needed for a tong time and this is a good location for one. She suggests that Council seriously consider allowing a right in, right out from Emerald for reasons of access and because those coming from out of town could more easily find the funeral home. She does not have a concern with a curbcut at this location. She is intrigued with the concept of a reception center. Do these exist at other locations in the area? Randy Schoedinger, Schoedinger Funeral Home stated that there is not another area location with this type of facility. They have observed a trend toward less traditional services, with families requesting a variety of celebration of life services and gatherings. This provides a separate facility for such a gathering. It could also be used for those having a traditional funeral to have a space for a dinner immediately adjacent. It could also be offered free of charge to community groups for meeting space at times the space is not scheduled for the business. Mr. Reiner asked it a kitchen would be included. Mr. Schoedinger responded that it would have a kitchen area suitable for caterers to use, but not full cooking facilities. Mr_ Keenan asked "rf liquor permits would be required for this facility. Mr. Schoedinger responded that caterers would secure such permits when using the faalities. Mr. Reiner stated that the City does need a funeral home, and this is an excellent location for one. The proposal has a very interesting layout. i~ Mr :, ~~ I l~ Schoedinger stated that it is very vital to them to have good access and that the OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting funeral home be easy to locate. Most of their clientele is elderly. In terms of exiting, it would be difficult to exit funeral processions by looping around the back of the building onto Innovation Drive and then turning again. The additional turns involved extend the width of the procession, backing up Emerald Parkway even more. Mr. Reiner noted that it appears that there is adequate parking on the site. Mr. Schoedinger responded that there are 180 spaces planned and this will generally meet their needs for all but an unusually large funeral service. Mr. Keenan noted that Ms. Wanner addressed the office uses and he recalls that the Planning Commission discussion related to reducing the density. Ms. Wanner responded that the Commission wanted to cap the density at approximately 9,000 square feet per acre. What is currently shown on the plan is around 10,000 square feet per acre. Mr. Keenan asked if the 180 parking spaces are for the funeral home only Mr. Schoedinger responded that this is correct. Mr. Keenan noted that the Commission noted that a site just to the south is also zoned for a funeral home and wilt soon be a subject of discussion. At the Commission meeting, Mr. Schoedinger responded to a question about having two funeral homes in close proximity. Mr. Keenan asked that he share those comments with Council. Mr. Schoedinger stated that the other applicant is Tidd Funeral Home, and as far as he knows, that project is presently on hold. They do not believe it is a negative to have two funeral homes in a community of this size. In other areas of Central Ohio, there are funeral homes adjacent to one another. Essentially, it will offer a choice to the consumer. Ms. Salay stated that it is not negative to have two funeral homes, but for a resident of this area, it is a negative to have two funeral homes in such close proximity to their homes. The site to the south on the Thomas Kohler development that is presently in contract with Tidd Funeral Home was the subject of negotiation in 1995 with the neighborhood. A big concession from the neighborhood's perspective was to allow the use of a funeral home. fn the case of the funeral home to the south, it is a conditional use. The conditions involve the proximity to the park and the homes, and given the fact that it meets the conditions, it will likely be considered a permitted use given Council's recent discussions about conditional uses. The neighborhood's concern is with having a permitted funeral home in such close proximity. While it is something needed in Dublin, the neighborhood does not support having two in such dose proximity. She could therefore not support this use in this bcation unless the funeral home use on the Thomas Kohler site is eliminated in some way. She is not certain how that could be done other than this applicant working out something with the developer of the Thomas Kohler site. This is simply the wrong location in her view. Mr. Schoedinger asked for clarification - is this because she believes the funeral home is a less attractive use than office? Ms. Salay responded that the business is not a pleasant use and it is not desirable to have two funeral homes in such close proximity to the neighborhood. The neighborhoods have asked her to carry this message to Council. Mr_ Lecklider asked about the specific location of the other conditional use to the south_ Ms. Wanner identified the location on the map. A funeral home is allowed as a condition use on that site. It has frontage along Emerald Parkway. Mr. Reiner asked if that is the area with a forest behind it. Ms. Salay responded that the forest is actually Heather Glen Park. Mr. Lecklider stated that he has some mixed feelings about this. He understands from a ~+ business perspective the reasons the applicant would favor this site, in view of its visibility. :: What has occurred to him tonight is a question of whether this is the highest and best use ~I for the site. This is his only reservation, given Council's responsibility to rezone. Perhaps i the City could in fact generate a great deal more revenue if it were an office building- 1. I~ Mrs. Boring stated that she has concerns about Council Members comments about what might develop on another site in the future. Even though the Thomas Kohler property is ~i OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting ___ 9 6 Hyland-Croy ad n dudes 189.57 a res with a varif 6.6. acres of ope space. It was r 6, 2005 and is ues of concern s d village area, a well as the 200 oad. The applic t is seeking fee . The site is loca ed in the northw ere recently an exed. She revie strict and surrou ding parcels in th ent to the south i zoned PUD, anc red by the conse ation design re ass the four cons rvation design s ed on the existin landscape feat i aplicant has cre led a proposed s I arriage lots and illage tots in the village retail ar is shown in the ick Roads. Th e are six access zoned, ii does not mean that the funeral home will be built on that site- She believes that the proposal before Council tonight is a fabulous development of a site located adjacent to a substation. She cannot imagine a better proposal for this site. She likes the reception area proposed. Council should look positively on the natural experience of death. This wilt be a nice neighbor for the adjacent substation. Mr. Schoedinger provided some history of the process. They contacted the City two years ago for assistance in identifying appropriate locations for a funeral home, and this was one of the five sites identified by the City. From the standpoint of being a good neighbor, homeowners in other communities have cited the same concerns about a proposed funeral home. tt is quickly realized that having an office use adjacent with heavy traffic at rush hour is much less desirable than a funeral home with traffic at off hours and which offers a reception center that can be used by the community. They would love to be part of the Dublin community- Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher thanked Mr. Schoedinger, and noted that Council looks forward to working with him. Ms. of at oncept Plan - ntry Greene - ner stated that is concept pla al uses, a villa retail area and 8~ Zoning Co fission on Octo of use and de gn of the propo land-Croy Ro and McKitrick pt plan prior to F i and includes sE site. The site is Rural, the Tarn Is are outside of cant has submitt ayed and explai lions of conserv des 60 estate to and 78 town ho e corner of Hyla - two along H itrick. The plan it ter of the site [ ee distinct sins h ve alleys and r s bares. She re s submitted a i itial concept p12 he highlighted 1 ee stand; a lot ~ rea perceived tr tan to create rear access arse Much of the dis have revised so included in the comments recei and should be is punctuated b of the retail ce has taken the along Hyland- tike to speak t She showed s Staff and the a revised ele setting to exp Herat parcels th coned R, Rural t West develop he City. As rec i maps that adr d the maps. B; .ion design, the to the north, 7f :s to the west. -Croy and McK d-Croy, two ;ludes 50 aer ' and proposed ere carriage he family areas: 1 access and ai n+ed some cony ised site plan, I They are seek changes: som ;eliminated to ave too much c m e open space, r y stilt adhering to c ssion at Plannin e of the plans in uncil packet. Tt ed. Staff felt th ore blended, an smaller park sp er and to those I lion of the histo i roy and McKitric the concepts to it me conceptual 1 ommission felt t e lion which divid s nd the village n is al ng Jerome, one c nt open space u ~ nds. A 4.6-acre es front the site. ~ northern portion located to the ce ptual elevations f sed on input fro g feedback from lots have been Ilow a better vie a grid-like patte >ving the lots to re 200-foot setb Commission rel t tnrs area as wet is area has beep the retail and n so the aoolican tong Brock Road a h bikepaths and r t of viewed by luded the f of setback ack on the t area of ved the aerial City are also the other ~tution, the ps_ She ,s and :plan which Inter of the ~uthwest area Finis on the d one along Is that _entral park is to led toward the The proposed tot plans shows the are the estate lot ,carriage lots ter; to the west i the town home r the three area .The applicant the Planning C mission on them oved to acc shed and bi , and the aF e south and ck_ ed to the vill Anew carat areas created a ces as well as a ock/pond featu nng in the resid list area. With c four corners b clc concept and Roads for the r tail portion only. Iht ail elevations ich were shown y tacked villag character, and s the masses of he elevations an n pate an ewsun p h access- In an ~ nt has modrfied t e e ling an addition retail area- The I retail site plan as ,based on re too segregat ge green portio that accessible to u ers is plan, the appl nt iecreased the s back The applicant w Id ~ the Commissi n. the applicant p vided addr OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Evans. Mechwart, Harrlbleto~ E~ Tifton. Inc. • Engineers. Staveyas. Flamers. Scientkts September 21, 2005 Mr. Randall Schoedinger 229 East State Street Columbus, OH 43215 RE: Preliminary Investigation -Emerald Parkway Tract EMH&T Project Number 20051838 Dear Mr. Schoedinger, At your request, EMH&T, Inc. has conducted a Preliminary Investigation for Waters of the United States for the approximately 8.8 acre property located northwest of the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive, in the City of Dublin, Franklin County, Ohio (Figure 1). Literature Review As shown on Figure 2, the site has an approximate elevation of 890 feet mean sea level (MSL) near the eastern property boundary and slopes upward to an elevation of 900 feet MSL near the eastern property boundary according to the USGS 7.5' Series Northwest Columbus, Ohio and Hillard, Ohio quadrangles (USGS, Photorevised 1982, 1984). One perennial stream is depicted flowing east along the northern property boundary. This stream is an unnamed tn'butary (iJT) to the Scioto River. No other drainageways, wet spots, marsh symbols or open water are mapped for the site. According to the Soil Survey of Franklin County, Ohio (USDA-SCS, 2/80), as shown on Figure 3, the site contains predominately Lewisburg-Crosby complex with 2-6% slopes (I eB). The southern portion the property has been mapped as Kokomo silty clay loam. The UT referenced on the USGS maps also appears on the soil survey. No open water, wet spot or marsh symbols are indicated within the site boundaries. A hydric soil is a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation (USDA-SCS, 1985). According to the MRCS, the Kokomo soil, series is hydric (USDA-SCS; 1/91). The Lewisburg-Crosby complex is listed as a non-hydric soil within Franklin County with hydric components found along drainageways and between knolls (USDA- scs, 6/91). RECEIVE D j,~1 2 3 2006 ~ ~`~ ~' ~ CITY OF DUBLIN LAND USE & M c M x x v i LONG RANGE PLANNING 5500 New /Ubarry Road Cohttnbus. OH 43054 • Phor-e 614.775.4500 • Fcpc 614.775.4800 caknibu~ • cMrd • rmKpac ~ a+aaa emhf.com . Mr. Randall Schoedinger September 21, 2005 RE: Preliminary Investigation -Emerald Parkway Tract Page 2 of 2 Onsite Findings The majority of the subject property is currently planted with soybeans. A small portion of the property along the western property boundary is fallow and overgrown with pioneering weeds typical of disturbance. The property is bordered on all other sides by agricultural land mixed with new commercial development. No wetland depressions were identified within the interior of the property. There is one perennial, jurisdictional channel on the property approximately 15 feet in width. This stream channel abuts the northern property boundary and continues east through an open box culvert beneath Emerald Parkway. Recommendations Based upon the site investigation, approximately 800 linear feet of jurisdictional stream was identified on the property. Pioneering herbaceous wetland plants were identified along the southern floodplain but wetland hydrology and hydric soils were not identified. This vegetation is typical of alluvial floodplain levees where precipitation infiltration may be slow. Based on these preliminary findings a formal delineation of the property should not be needed. However, a minimum vegetative buffer of ZS feet should be maintained along the identified stream throughout the property. This buffer will minimize bank instability and aid in sediment and erosion control. We also recommend that appropriate sediment and erosion control and stormwater management best management practices be utilized during site development. Permitting Any impacts to this stream for future site development would require a permit from the COE. Please feel free to contact me at (614) 775-4500 if you have questions or wish to discuss permitting. We appreciate this opportunity to assist you with your predevelopment needs. Sincerely, EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC. Sean Peffer Environmental Scientist Environmental Division Cc: John Wicks, EMH&T FIGURE 1 Area Location Map 1"=1/2 mile (Franklin County Engineering Department, 2005) ~. ~ 1 . f •~ '~$ 1 ~.o o _ ` __ ~ "T- __ _ `_ __ x •o ~ N ~~ ~. . ~.. ` f...~ ~I i • I I -. ~ 4 1 INGs w o~ ~ ~ i - - ~. i ~~ ~ i i -~~- ~ ~~~- a ~ FIGURE 2 USGS Topographical Map 1'=1000' Hilliarnf, Ohlo (Photanspected 1984) FIGURE Franklin County Soil Survey Map 1 "=660' (USDA-SCS, 2/80) PROPOSED SITE PLAN r~ I s ~ ~~ /~ ~ b~ ~ ~' I I __~~ ~ I I; ~ I n I I »~o-. ~0~~ , ~ ~ ~~ I I ~ I ', ~'~~' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~ I I `:, I .,.o_,x.~-moo 3~~ ~I I I I~~;'I 1 I / ~'\ / ~\ /~/ ~T "2~ ~;~ ~\ / ~ ~ \\ \ r Flaodv'0j0 ~_ ~ ~^' ..g. \ /~ 1 I 11,I _~_ __ ~_ _ ~ _ ..___ I I I , , _ _ iI - - I i I ' I ~, ~ i I I I -- -- -~ r. .~` ~ IL I G I I ~~~~\~~~ ~ I ~ I I I~\ ~ \ ~ ,. III`- I: ~ I i SUBAREA A" \ ~ ~` \ ~ ~ ~I. I ~ I II I ~ I vwrouo \ ~\ ~~` \ .' \ I i \ I I I I I ... \ ' \ cu I ~ I ~ I .~ ~ I I /, ~ ~ '! I ~ ~ ~ki_ ~hz el ICI i ~ X ~ I I I I I I ~ \ \ \ ~ \ rtuu ~u~w~xcaiuu ~ ~ ~ \ ~' ~~ /~j~ I ~~ ~ I I \ J \ \\/ Ij `° ~ I I / ^J p` ~\\V'\i \ NIA '. I I f 9 I ~~ ~~ •) I \\ \\ ~~ I I \ V o~ / I I I I I I ~~~~~ I~~ ;; _ = \ ~ -~~ III I ~ .~ '' ~ ~ I 1 1 I -1.._~ ~, - - -~ - - E - - ~^~ b __ _~ -- ~ I _~ _ t - ~ ; I ~.`, ~ i ~1"LJ ~ ~_ _ ~~=ti PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ,e c A ~- E L C V AT I O tit _ -- __._T, I-oT ._ __ it ~_ ~. 1 r- ~~ ~~ ~ ; sloe ~~EV,rTlo ti:l _..- ,,-o„ ---------- __ ~ e. - ENT~Y_ELE~/,o."r~onl - -__-_ ~ ii ti ,,;- PROPOSED SIGNAGE ' 2'-4" 0'-4" I I 0'-4" OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drivl DOUBLE FACE ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: 3/S"=1' CABINET: CUSTOM FABRICATED 18' DffP ALUMINUM CABINET FINISHED PMS 295 BLUE AND WHITE FACE: ROUTED AWMINUM BACKED WITH 1/8' WHITE PLEX. IUUMBJP310N C.W.H.O. FLIK)RESCENT LAMPS AS REQW2ED FOR PROPER ILLUMINATION. MOUNTWG: 6' X .280' WALL STEEL POLE - 5' X 5' X 2'-b' CONCRETE FOOTER POLE COVER: 18' X 30' ALUMINUM POLE COVER FINISHED PMS 295 BLUE NOTE: Atl SIGNAGE TO BE U.l. APPROVED AND LABELED. INSTALLATION OF SIGNAGE TO MEET N.E.C.600 REQUIREMENTS. ~_ 2'-4" ---~ I DOUBLE FACE NON ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGN SCALE: 3/4"=1' CABINET: CUSTOM FABRKATED 4' DEEP ALUMINUM CABINET FINISHED DURANODIC BRONZE AND WHRE FACE: 1I8' ALUMNUM FSJISHED BRONZE WTM WHRE REFLECTNE COPS' MOUNTMG: 2.5' X .203' WALL STEEL POLE PROPOSED TEXT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SCHOEDINGER FUNERAL SERVICES Innovation Drive /Emerald Parkway Revised December 30, 2005 Introduction The site is approximately 8.$f acres and zoned Restricted Industrial ("RI")_ It is located northwest of the intersection of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway. The property is intended for development in two subareas. Subarea A will consist of a funeral home, a reception center, and a remembrance garden_ Subarea B shall consist of suburban office uses totaling 32,000 square feet. The proposed uses are appropriate for this location due to the development patterns of adjacent properties and the proximity of State Routes 33 and 161 and the Interstate 270 freeway interchanges. Upon approval of this rezoning application, the owner and/or applicant shall have five (5) years from the effective date of this rezoning to have a final development plan approved_ Subarea A Funeral Home and Reception Center A1.01 Description and Acreage: Subarea A is approximately 4.4f acres. Subarea A may contain a funeral home, a reception center, and a remembrance garden. A1.02 Permitted Uses: Subarea A may contain the following uses: a funeral home; a reception center, used in conjunction with the funeral home; and a remembrance garden. A crematory shall not be permitted on site. The reception center may be used for private receptions and by users including but not limited to: business associations, professional membership organizations, labor organizations, civic, social and fraternal associations, political organizations, charitable organizations, and nonprofit membership organizations. The remembrance garden will be located in the vicinity of the reception center and is designed to be a passive park-like setting which may include a path and benches. A remembrance garden shall conform to all licensing requirements and municipal regulations. A1.03 Permitted Density: 1. Two buildings shall be located in this subarea and total building coverage shall be approximately 14,700 square feet. The funeral home shall be approximately 11,700 square feet and the reception center shall ~ ~~~ ~\ /ED approximately 3,000 square feet. t~ ! ~~ OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PROPOSED TEXT A1.04 Traffic and Circulation: 1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive as approved by the city engineer. 2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan based on a traffic /access study and approval by the city engineer. The Innovation Drive curb cuts shown on the Preliminary Development Ptan shall be full access. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the city engineer and may serve both subareas. 3. The westernmost curb cut on Innovation Drive shall be permitted as needed to serve future land development to the west with the approval of the city engineer. A1.05 Parking and Loading: I. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance with Dublin City Code. A1.06 Setback Requirements: I. Setbacks from Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement areas. 2. Building setbacks from Emerald Parkway and from Innovation Drive shall be a minimum of 100 feet. 3. There shall be a zero parking/paving setback and a 20 foot building setback from the property line dividing Subarea A and Subarea B. 4. The reception center shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet from the north property line. 5. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea A. A1.07 Height Requirements: The average height of structures shall be 38 feet above finished floor elevation. OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home 2 Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PRQP4SED TEXT A1.08 Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials. A1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas: 1. No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. 2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be enclosed or not visible from the street or adjoining property. 3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shall be screened from all streets or adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination thereof A1.10 Landscaping: Landscaping shall be in accordance with Dublin City Code. The northern environs of the proposed pond nearest the north property line shall assume a naturalistic design direction. The intent is to tie this part of the site with the stream corridor to the north making a seamless transition to the developed site. The use of indigenous plant materials, including trees, shrubs and perennials will constitute the plant pallet. On the southern edge of this northern pond along with the pond at the intersection of [nnovation Drive and Emerald Parkway, ornamental trees grouped with flowering shrubs and perennials will be arranged to create informal, causal planting beds. A lawn will run to the edge of the pond where no planting beds are planned. 2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed and/or maintained along the Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive frontage as depicted on the attached Landscape Plan. The landscape buffer will be compatible with existing developments and approved plans along Emerald Parkway. 3. Plant material when installed shall meet the following minimum size requirements as follows: a. Deciduous trees 2-inch caliper minimum b. Evergreen trees 6-foot height minimum OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PR~P~SED TEXT c. Ornamental trees 1 '/z inch caliper minimum or 6-foot height minimum d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum 4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected during construction with tree preservation snow fencing. 5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. Al.ll Architecture: 1. The architecture and color palette will be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors in brighter hues are permitted for building accent features only such as signage, awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. and will be submitted with the final development plan. 2. Building materials shall consist of: a. Stone veneer or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone detailing. b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or asphalt shingles with no less than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used. c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer. 3. Roof: a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 6J12 or greater. b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required. c. Flat roofs are permitted provided they are proportionately integrated with parapets that adequately screen mechanical rooftop equipment. 4. Scale: a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the landscape. OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home 4 Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PROPOSED TEXT b. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and other architectural elements that help break up the building mass and scale. 5_ Wall Articulation/Fenestration_ a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. b. The amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the amount of solid facade. A1.12 Signage and Graphics: 1. All signage shall use muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural style of the building. Since Subarea A has frontage along two roadways, two (2) monument signs and directional signage shall be permitted for the funeral home. One (1) monument sign shall be located at the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive and one (1) monument sign shall be located along Emerald Parkway toward the northern edge of Subarea A. Directional signage shall be Located at the Innovation Drive entrance. Manufacturer specification sheets shall be provided at the time of the Final Development Plan. Subarea B Office B1.01 Description and Acreage: 1. Subarea B is approximately 4.4f acres. Subarea B shall be comprised of suburban office type uses totaling 32,000 square feet. The architectural style shall be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan which is to the south of the site. B1.02 Permitted Uses: Subarea B shall include those uses listed in Dublin City Code Section 153.025, Suburban Office and Institutional District. B1.03 Permitted Density: 1. The maximum permitted density shall be 32,000 square feet. B1.04 Traffic and Circulation: OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home $ Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PROPOSED TEXT 1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive. 2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. Said curb cuts shall be full access. The curb cut locations may be modified with the approval of the city engineer. 3. The westernmost Innovation Drive access shall provide shared access to the property to the west to accommodate future development of that tract. 4. The easternmost Innovation Drive access shall be shared between Subarea A and Subarea B. B1.05 Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance with the Dublin City Code. B1.06 Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks from Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for all pavement areas. 2. Building setbacks from Innovation Drive a minimum of 100 feet. 3. The minimum side yard shall be zero for parking and 20 feet for buildings at the east property line and a 25 foot building setback and a shared access at the west property line. 4. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea B. B1.07 Height Requirements: The average height of structures shall be 38 feet from the finished floor elevation. B1.08 Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and screened from view by a solid brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials. B1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas: No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building. 05-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home 6 Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PROPOSED TEXT 2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be enclosed or not visible from the street or adjoining property_ 3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shall be screened from all streets or adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination thereof. B1.10 Landscaping: 1. Landscaping shall be similar to the approved Thomas / Kohler plan to the south of the site in accordance with Dublin City Code and a plan will be submitted with the final development plan. 2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed along the Innovation Drive frontage as depicted on the attached Landscape Plan. 3. Plant material shall be installed with minimum size requirements as follows: a. Deciduous trees b. Evergreen trees c. Ornamental trees 2-inch caliper minimum 6-foot height minimum 1 '/2 inch caliper minimum or 6-foot height minimum d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum 4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected during construction with tree preservation snow fencing. 5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved. B1.11 Architecture: The architecture and color palette will be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors in brighter hues are permitted for building accent features only such as signage, awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. and will be submitted with the final development plan. 2. Building materials shall consist of: a. Stone veneer or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone detailing. 05-1822 ~ Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive PR~P~SED TEXT b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or asphalt shingles with no less than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used. c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer. 3. Roof: a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 6/ 12 or greater_ b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required. c. Flat roofs are permitted provided they aze proportionately integrated with parapets that adequately screen mechanical rooftop equipment. 4. Scale: a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the landscape. b. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and other architectural elements that help break up the building mass and scale. 5. Wall Articulation/Fenestration: a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on all sides of each structure. b. The amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the amount of solid facade. B1.12 Signage and Graphics: All Signage shall be muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural style of the buildings. Manufacturer specification sheets shall be provided at the time of the final development plan. F:Docslschoedinger_txt (12!30/OS-dlh) (5) word 05-1822 8 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive CITY OF DUBLIN,. land Use and long Range Phmaiag ~'"'°Shier-Rings Road y Ohio 4301b-1136 614-910-4600 i 14-410-4141 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION OCTOBER 6, 2005 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Concept Plan - OS-155CP -Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive Location: 8.8 acres located on the west side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of Innovation Drive. Existing Zoning: RI, Restricted Industrial District. Request: Review and feedback for a Concept Plan under the provisions of Code Section 153.053(C). Proposed Use: A funeral home and office development. Applicant: Applied Innovation, 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016; represented by Nick Cavaleris, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-464/Email: jadkins@dublin.oh.us. RESULT: The Concept Plan was positively received by the Commission. Issues discussed regazded the use of the reception center, traffic, access, buffering, and setbacks from the stream corridor. No vote or action was taken. STAFF CERTIFICATION ` '~, . ~ -. Jamie E. Adkins Planner 05-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 4 Mr. Ger r moved for pproval of s Rezoning Historic istrict chaza er and will f ciiitate futur 1) That a applicant pplies for al necessary bi of approved s' a modificati s. Mr. Z' erman sec nded the yes; .Jones, yes Mr. Saz Gerbe yes. (Appro ed 7-0.) 5. boning - 05~42Z - Plats Mr. erber swore those who i Dav d Goldthwait ,represents the ne condition the staff r Mr Gerber mov for approv, Hi toric District hazacter and 1) That the a licant appli constructio of any appro~ and the yes; Mr. to the applic~ ~rt as listed of this R ~cilitate i for all 3 site me ~immerm seconded emotion, Ms. Jone ,yes; Mr. S eholtz, er, yes. ( pproved 7-0 ) cause it wil continue the preservation f the growth, wi one conditio : lding and zo 'ng permits rior to con coon e was as fo ows: Ms. R iss, yes; Ms. oring, [essineo, y Mr. Z' rman, yes; d Mr. it - 87 So th High Str et in re~azd to this case. Peter Corat~la, Plats DW. ~ 'ng because ' will contin the pre e growth, wi one conditi n: essazy bull ing permits prior to cations. the vote was as follows: s. Reiss, Mr. Messin o, yes; Mr. immerm: agreed to ion of the ition and Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. 6. Concept Plan - OS-155CP -Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive Mr. Gerber explained that this is an application for review and approval of a Concept Plan for a 43,000-square-foot funeral home and office buildings on an 8.8-acre site. He said the Concept Plan review examines the general design of the proposed development and this is anon-specific review and the results aze not binding on either the developer or the municipality. The Commission is to provide feedback and then submit the application to City Council for its review. He said if approved, the applicant is authorized to file a preliminary development plan or rezoning, whichever is applicable within the next eight months. At a later date, City Council will schedule a public hearing and subsequently vote to approve or disapprove the proposal. All development plans will require approval by the Commission prior to construction. Jamie Adkins highlighted the staff report and presented slides of the site. She said the proposed site includes a funeral home building at the corner of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. In association with this use, is a reception center at the back portion of the site. She said one and two-story office buildings are shown on the western portion of the site. Ms. Adkins said a substantial creek exists along the north side of the property with associated floodplain and floodway and, if the applicant proceeds, work cannot be done within this floodway plus 20 feet. If work is done within the 100-yeaz floodplain, a hydraulic study will be necessary to indicate that they have compensating storage. OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 5 Ms. Adkins said staff supports this Concept Plan, believes the uses are generally consistent with the development in the area, have adequate services, and will create a needed service within the Ciry. She said staff will continue to work with the applicant through the rezoning process to refine the uses, architecture, signage, etc. Staff also believes that the Concept Plan is consistent with the Community Plan. Nick Cavaleris, attorney representing the applicant, added that the site was divided into two subareas for the funeral home and office uses. He said an electrical substation exists to the north and the applicant feels it is screened adequately from this use. Randy Schoedinger, Schoedinger Funeral Service, said they feel this is a needed service in Dublin. He described his 150-yeaz-old company. Mr. Gerber explained that there will be ample opportunity later for those wishing to speak regarding this proposed development at Commission and Council hearings if this project continues forward. Mr_ Zimmerman noted that to the south of this site is the Thomas-Kohler PCD, and the text allows the use of a funeral home. He had heard that an application had been received from the Tidd Funeral Home in that area. Ms. Adkins confirmed that an application of a Tidd Funeral Home had been received. She added that a funeral home in the Thomas-Kohler text was considered a Conditional Use. There was adiscussion-about the close proximity of the two funeral homes, and it was concluded that it was not uncommon to have funeral homes located close to each other. Mr_ Gerber asked what "Existing Non-Residential" meant in the Community Plan. Ms_ Adkins replied that when the 1997 Land Use Map was created, this site was already zoned RI, Restricted Industrial, therefore the future land use shown was "Existing Non-Residential." Mr. Zimmerman inquired about the Schoedinger crematory. Mr. Schoedinger clarified that all of the cremation and embalming operations are completed at their downtown facilities. Ms. Boring asked what the density of the office buildings was. Ms_ Adkins replied that the entire site density was just less than 5,000 square feet per acre. She said the office area density had not been calculated. Ms. Reiss asked what the overall Thomas-Kohler density was. Ms. Adkins was unable to cite this density. Ms. Boring asked about the detached reception area. 05-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 5, 2005 Page 6 Mr. Schoedinger explained that their industry was moving away from traditional funeral services, and more to a celebration of lives. He said memorial services are more prevalent, and people are finding the need to have more of a gathering with refreshments. He said the reception center would be offered free for daytime use of community groups during their off hours. Ms. Boring said it was important that the bikepaths connect to this site. Ms. Boring was concerned that there were too many separate, small offices in the concept. She thought it looked too cluttered on the layout. Greg Krobot, The Edge Group, explained that the footprints shown were the same as the office buildings to the south. He said they were used as a model to study what other land uses might be available. He said Schoedinger does not need the entire 8.8 acres. Ms. Boring said this was a very attractive use next to the substation. She added that this is a very necessary service to the community and she looked forward to having it in Dublin. Mr. Saneholtz referred to page two of the site layout where it included an 11,000-square-foot funeral home building and reception center, combined. He noted that the City Engineer was not inclined to allow the curb cut on Emerald Parkway. He encouraged the applicant to consider eliminating the Emerald Parkway curb cut. Mr_ Saneholtz asked about the traffic flow of the funeral processions. Mr. Schoedinger said the routes to the cemeteries have not been mapped out, but he thought the majority of the time, Emerald Parkway would be used. He said funeral traffic occurred at times other than rush hour, typically at 10 a.m. and 1 p.m., with calling hours in the afternoon or after rush hour. Mr. Saneholtz requested comments from staff on the anticipated impact upon Dublin's road system, if any, with respect to the funeral home, especially since two are being discussed. Ms. Adkins replied that a traffic study will be required at the rezoning, and it will take into account the surrounding uses. Mr. Gerber said he was also concerned as it related to traffic issues for the office uses distinguished from those of the funeral home. Mr. Saneholtz suggested that a buffer be considered between the parking lots for the office buildings and the funeral home. Mr. Gerber asked if the residents had been contacted. Mr. Schoedinger indicated they had not since this was only a Concept Plan. Mr. Gerber told him that they should contact the residents prior to coming back to the Commission for review and approval. 05-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 7 Mr. Schoedinger said since the funeral home pazking lot is not often full, it provides extra parking for the offices. Mr_ Saneholtz said overall, this seemed like a very good location for the use. Ms. Jones said this was a service that the community needed. Ms. Reiss expected the office use would contribute to the rush hour traffic congestion at the intersection of Emerald Pazkway and Innovation Drive, and suggested staff consider signalization. Mr. Gerber agreed and said blocking of the intersection should be avoided so there is not neighborhood cut-through traffic. Ms. Reiss asked if the reception center would be available for non-funeral related parties. Mr. Schoedinger said while it would not be the primary purpose, the reception center could definitely be encouraged for small parties. Ms. Reiss asked if there would be on-site food service. Mr. Schoedinger said there would be refrigeration and a sink for caterers to use, but not a full kitchen. Ms. Reiss requested ample setbacks from the stream for pavement and during construction so that the water quality would be protected. Mr. Saneholtz said music and other limitations may need to be placed on the reception area use. Mr. Zimmerman understood the staff position on the Emerald Parkway curb cut, but he suggested it might be better for the funeral home processions because there is going to be right- in/right-out at the median there. He said that it was better to exit at Emerald Pazkway than it was to go to Innovation Drive and block the intersection. He requested that staff consider it. Mr. Schoedinger agreed that would work better for them. Mr. Gerber was concerned about the number of office buildings as it related to density and the impact on the local neighborhoods as it related to the traffic in their area. He suggested removal of a building might be considered. Ms. Boring asked if there was any time that Emerald Parkway was at a C level for traffic. Bazb Cox said Emerald Parkway was designed for that capacity. She said a bottleneck is experienced because when it changes into the Columbus jurisdiction, it does not have as many lanes. She said there are still improvements along Tuttle that need to happen and it is all interconnected. She said the possible impact of this project to the west has been discussed with the applicant and will be worked through. OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 8 Mr. Schoedinger said the average funeral procession includes up to 20 cars. However, occasionally there may be 100 cars and he said they will back up traffic. He said for the processions, it would be quicker if there was aright-out onto Emerald Parkway because they will proceed without a lot of turning_ Mr. Gerber said he thought this is a fine project and is something Dublin has needed for a long time. He suggested the traffic was a concern and that the residents be involved. He thanked everyone. _ 7. C ncept Plan OS-072CP Bantry Gre ne - 9756 H land-Croy oad Mr. erber expl ' d that this an applica on for revie and approv 1 of a Conce t Plan for a mi ed-use devel pment on a 89-acre site at includes 36 single-f ily lots, 78 ownhome uni and approxi ately 53,500 square feet o retail with 8 .6 acres of o nspace. Cla dia Husak hi ighted the ff report fo this case an presented sl des of the si .The site incl des several arcels recent annexed to e City. Th site is zone R, Rural Di trict as are su unding par Is within th City of Dub in. To the uth is the T an West d velopment, zo d PUD, PI ed Unit Dev lopment. M . Husak said required b the Conserv tion Design esolution, a applicant submitted m ps addressin the four re aired Conse ation Desi steps. Sh said Step 1 required the id ntification primary co servation ar as, and in 's case, th include 'age ways, e fisting ponds, and sensitive etland are .Step 2 req res the ident' ccation of na al features, d on this sit they includ existing tree tands. The plicant has so provided iew sheds ' d out of the ite as indicat d on a slide. Step 3 invol es the identi cation of dev lopable are d location o home sites, 'ng into ac ount the are identified conservatio areas. Step equires layo of roads bas d on the ho site locatio . s. Husak id the propos d site plan i cludes estate lots to the n rth, carriage is and villa lots in the ce ter of the sit ,and townh mes to the w st, and the c nter. A will e retail area s generally to ated at the ' tersection of Hyland-Cro and McKit ' k Roads. S e said the s e includes 50 rcent opens ace with bik paths and tr Is surround' g existing an created pon s. A 4.6-acre ntral park th paths and ormalized pl tings is pro osed in the nter of the to which prow' es a unique ontage to vil age homes d the townho es. Ms. Husak said the prop sed lot plan howed three istinct single family lot ar as, including he estate lots o the north, a carriage to (rear-loade lots with all y access), th village lots, d Estate to varied in elevatio .The 33 vi in width. Certain car Six-unit ownhome b~ concep 1 elevation Commi ion packets. h from 9 to 100 fee and the ap icant has pr vided conce foal lots area proximately 0 feet in wid and the 14 carriage lots vary lots front onto the cen r openspace d a boulev ded entry fe tore. gs are sh wn on the p posed plan. Ms. Husak s owed slides f the ?levatio of the vi aye retail oposed wer included the OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive 09/23/05 15:52 FA% 7616590 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS ~juuz RECORD OF ORDINANCES National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Ordinance No.____27-88---- Amended) Prrssed__ AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONING ON 93.947 ACRES OF ANNEXED TER- RITORY (R-1B, RESTRICTED SUB- URBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, FIASHINGTON TOWNSHIP) LOCATED " ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SHIER-RINGS ROAD AND WILCOX ROAD TO RI, RESTRICTED IN- DUSTRIAL DISTRICT Form No. 2808-A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, 7 of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached legal description maxked Exhibit "A"), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby reclassified to RI, RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B" , including the list of con- tiguous property owners, and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated in to and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this 16th day of May E Mayor - Presiding Officer 1988. Attest: 09/23/2005 FRI 05-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive -----~-----~-----~-----0-----~-----~------~-----~ r~ .~%Gc.l~~/ CLerk of Co ncil 1 hereby certiFy that copies of this flr~:nance7lfesolutio0 were Fosfe~ n t~i•- Sponsor: Planning Department arty of Dublin in accordanie with Section 731.25 of the Ohio Revised de. ~~,~ Clerk of Cauoa"1, Dublin, 0 io OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive 09/23/2005 FRI U9/Y3/U5 15:57 r'AX 7ti1ti5yU i.~(;iSLA'1'1V~ AN'r'A11ZS IQjU16 Minutes of MeetioBCommission Planning & Zoning April 7, 1988 EXHIBIT "C" Page 17 6. Rezoning Application Z88-005 - DBS on Wilcox Road Ms. Clarke stated that staff is in support of this application if it is amended to RI, Restricted Industrials~lwestfroadlto•be extendedefrom WilcoxhRoadstorthised through the site, and the ea good access. new road make sense and provide o Lou Weil, representing the ownerslointhf ratheaLl,liimitedeIndustrial zoning on stated that the reason fmr app y~ g the east side of the proposed road is because of the land use adjacent. to this property, particularly Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric. He feels that this property should be able to have a like use with outside storage. Mr. Weil has talked with staff and feels that if tie goes ahead with RI zoning on the whole piece and applies for a conditional use variance, staff will Iicantlislwilling r ably on it based on good outdoor storage. On this basis, app to amend the plan to eliminate the LI zoning and convert plan to RI zoning. Mr. Willis stated that the Cosgray Sanitary Sewer is anticipated to extend through this piece of property and hopes that Mr. Weil will work with administration on a commitment to have a right-of-way perhaps by transferring it or contributing it. Mr. Weil stated that they would be more than happy to do this. Mr. Berlin made a motion to approve the rezoning with the condition that the property is zoned RI and that the engineering report is complied wesh'Ms~Rausch, motion was seconded and the vote was as follows: Mr. Jezerinac, y es; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Grace, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Berlin, y yes. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1:10 A.M. Secretary - Planning & Zoning Commission OS-1822 Schoedinger Funeral Home 09i23i2005 FRI Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive __ ,~ _ ~ ~ ~ ,'~ r ~ - ~ ~ ~ , , ~ -~ ~ ~ ~~ {"~~ u \ i --- i _ i _- - - C'~aG ~t - ~:~~ ~ ? ~ I ,~=t ~ ~ - '' ~~ 7 I_ I ~, _ ~ „ -~ i ~ , -NIr °~ -~ ~ ' -- , , -- - µ, `_- _ I , ~~ - - - -, `I . _ ,~ _ =, ~ ~ ~- ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ` , ' _ ~~ ~~ ,i- , - ~~~ ~ - ~ - == - - ~ ~ r - _ ;~~~~ ~~; ' - ~~ _ ~, ~- ~ ~ ~( , ~~8, _ ~ ~,= ;, ; ~ Y ~ _., ~~, -- ~ ~, ~- -. ~ : _ _ ~ -- , - v,w~rD~n~nX ~n n ~c~nm3 ~~ ~X ~ ~ (p ^ N ~ ro ~ ~ ~ o _ y m m ~avw~oa0~ ~ "~ . ~ ~ ~ w o. a ~ o w ~ F w '"' a s. m ~ Q 1 0 N N ~ ~ A N ro v a ro ~, v y ~ ~ . ~ 2 <. \~J N L_. r O z D n ~ < ~~ a~ r n ~ o r7'I rn o o== ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O I"r o m , ~ ~ w N~ m `" O Z n c v ~; ~ ~' 6 W~ ~~ 3v+~m c ~• ~ ~ [1 p ~ ~ n 00 ~ c ~Qm o~ ~°omC l ~ ° ~ W °_ ~ O C V ~ o ~ n ~ ~ N ~ _ d1 ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 70 ~ rn ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Na ~~ ~ o~ ~ ~~ ~ 3 _ O ~ fD ~ o~ ~ W ~ a ~~ N ~„ m z fD n' Z ~ n C C O ~ ~ ~ W ~ V N Z K C C ~ n ~ N ~~ N o °~s ~ ~ o V QD I ~ ~" _~ ~- O vi ~ _ N = ~ ¢7 ~ Q w ~ (D ~ r-r fD ~ O n n n n n Z n m VI A W N D ~~~ ~ ~ 0 ~~.1~1 ~mo~o o z~°r ~' z a' z Z ~ ~~ v ~~ nZ ~~ m~ D~ ~Z n =z rn CZl n-I~ m v m rn r m r rn D r m o N W Z `o ~~ ~ 3 w ~~ N p o "' a, rn r z D /rn rn r O '~ rn J~ 1 r D 0 _~ O~ T C Z m D r m n m ..~ n z 0 m O Z n m ~~ ~~ «. .~ 00000 ~ ,'~, a, o ~ a m m ~ 3 z 3 3 3 0 8 0 o ti a ti o ~' ~ w m <m ~ w ti ~ c ` 3 e a b ~ N u y e ° a o ~ o B ° n ~ o ~' 0 0 a 2 v ~ a T m 0 0 0 0 in o rt a 3 3 m~ 3 3 ~ b a ~ o b U ~ ti O U ~ ~ 4 o Q ~O O ~ b m a ~ o a ~ o 0 o C ~ ~ m n D Q 1 y w ti ~ ° o b ~ n ~ ~ c e u ti i o m ~b ---~ '~ II` c a ~ ~- ~ ~ _ u 0 U ~- _ .... ~ a ~ ~ ~ " am i ~__ 3 ~ m'~ o0 = a- ~ ~~ ~~ a ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~D o 0 o I ~, O JB' Mn a / ~ r a n o ~~ 0 a °j ..~ 0 0 e ~ y ~~ o p ~ o ~ a ~ '~ a a w D J o ~ x ~'o ~ 0 i ~. a ~,` 0 C7 ~~ S~ ~ ~_ T -i ~^ -: ~3 [` ~o r LJ ~ C) ~^ -: ~j a~n ~n~ a ~ m w n O R r ~ ~1 Y~~'OS ~ F ~ o m 'O a o lQpyo goo do Z a°Q°n db~ns 0 J ~ A ~~ F n~n~n (>tA lyN ~. I I i ~~i~ I ~ ~a Ci j ~ 1~ i ,' ~; $ ~.. ~ 3 q R ~ ~~ f ~ ~~. ~- ~ - r4 - - - r~ ~i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~S i is II ~i III ti ~.~ r :, ~ ~ C• ;~ ~'; c3 '~a ci ~ j ~i(3 ~~~ i' / `; ~s~°°'ab __ - _- ~~~ 0 ~^~; _ m e ti ~~ ~ o O ~~ ,IBS 1 J/ a 4 ~ ~ ~ ~) n' ,~ .'1 ~~ C, I ~,~~ ;~Ei~i ~~~~ ;,~a ~.~" ~~;~ ~ _ , ,e ~ .. -- ~ ~ ~~U SoS~, o a, ~yy s. -- - Ex.EMERgLO P - - -- - - - - -- - - ARKWAY _ - i -_~_.-_____-_-- _ ---- I~ ~ w I `~ c~ c.,': C~ `s ~ ~ c~ ~ oh I ' 'fi ~~ ~,~ a 21 ~n ~ ~n a m 8 °~. n p O C C a ~ O O ~ `~ o 0 bb ~a ~ a .i, b UVm ~~~ aaa n n n $o crop ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~~ 3~ wn~a' ^a ~^ti bOrz_a C ~~ N Q ~ ~ n. O y e a33 H a ~~n 0 pro 3 aF a m O~o 0 ~ b~0 O~Q o ~ ~`+ ~_ ~a~ a `nm a a mt o ?~~ Q ~°OOa ~4~ M1 y n m 0 n °a n V / C7 ~ ~ O ~ Z a T T t,l n 2~ ® Z n <a n Z ~ O oco ~ ~ m =m = rn ~ ~~ Zo ~ Z Cq w ao ~ T ~ m a ~lJ Z OO Z -i ~~' ~ O -, ~„ -i _ ~,, ~ ,~J ~-~ fl ~ ~ _l. _ . \ _- RY R- V ~G - ~. ~ ~ Io __ ~I - A / i / ~/ i ~~ ~ i ~~-I 1 ~-~ ~ ~ ~1 - 1'{- ~j J ~ - _ ~I ~~c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~- F `~ A ~G TyT o ~ ~; ~ ~~- ' ~ ~-1 J ~ J _ ~~ I I C I- n~ I ~I i ii'3 i - /%ERALD ::{ -- r - _- PARI //,Y ~~ i ---- ~ l _- ~.. ~~ ~ Z G7 _ 1 _~ ~ ~ t: ~~ ~ /'C ~ ~~~~~~~ , , T ' / ~ ~ _ 1- -- ~~ f~ ci ci ~2 ~~ ,, s~aD~ /" `ob ~m+ ~i L~~ ~ ~~ ma bvrnq ti N 0 0 o ,~,~ o_ "'f~ ~ q ci 4 u '~ ~~ ): ~~ fi ~ ~ c2j b~ c_ ~ A W N _ 4 ~ m ~n a i V ,. ~ , T ., ~ ~ r T .. m 's. a ~. ~ ~~ L 0 3 ~ _~ ~O j ~ a 0 n m rn ,. ~ ~ ~ , _ _~ „ , .., ~ W ~ -~ l,; O O U Li \ L~ O ~, o U ~ ~ b l.~ V ` O A ~ ~ ~ U U ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ \ o- '~ _ ~~ -. T '- ~~ c.~ -. ~ ~ ,. -_ ~ ~ 4 _ a 0= 4 ~~ T 1,. T ~~ 0 ~ ti m N ~ / m ~ // k / / S / / y ~ % // ~' ~ i A o ~ / ~ o~ m i / o ~ r' ~ ~ ~ o a ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ a~ D ~ \ W ~ ]~ o ~~ f. l i ~ __ __ __ ~,. Q~., ~p5-_ ,' ~ti. ~ i ,~: ~ ~, ;~ 36. I ~3 / ~ ._. .. 90 S _ __ 90F m ~ A1. F -. 9f ,-~1f} 5~S I o I h .1 _ ~~ OI i 4~~ - i / ~ ~ ~~ o _ -_ tn~ ' cnj _ _ / II OII 11 Iln ~ t ;/ 4~A~A~ ___ ~~ / ~~ !nvmo, o ~'~O 4 n ~/ ~titi°pO ~ /// ~ /~/r i^ ~ ~ / g ~ ti ~~''P o. /, ~ - / ,~ ~~ 9 / ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l .~~4 .I ~ I ~SO~P036 l -__ __- _ yi I .I \ .S'U OB - . ~ rl ~ ~~ B ~ ~ ~ i'~O __ ilI `,3.735ZE ____~ _ ~ ' ~ /I ~ / ~ ~ I ~ - ir ~ I ' N ~~~~ I ~ G I ~ L ~~ ~~ ~- A ov / _ _ -- `a ~ u ' (i~ials~o wilN3ais3aJ ci / ~ ~ 213f::3~f ~~ / , _ - ~~ ~~ v ~. o _~ ~a Ci n j' o i; ;S 4 5) n r - 3 f5 -;r ;~ ~/ ads ~ / ~~p~ ~,~ to r ~~0 ~ tiY ~ ~' ~3~ i /a ~ // ~ ~ ~~ ~~f \ ,~ ~ ~~ ~'`~ /; ~\.^ - ~, , / - ~ °- / .%~ ~ r,~ ,, ~~ ' ,. ~~ /, ~~ ~ ~~ i~ / +~ ~ ~ ~i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~, ; ~ / / o~ 1 ~ % ti i ya i i l ~ , ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ n o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ci \ n ~ ~ ~ o ~i ~ ~ z ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ - - I ~. .~ ' r ---- ---- -- 2 ~ a ~+.• ° ~ ]: I i o i I R si / n ~ ~ ~ ~~~ I I ~ ~~. ' I / ~ I / ~ I I ° ~ ~' ~ ~a ~7 o qt,,~l `^ ~ ~ ~~ ~; . ~~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ , ~ -. _- ~: , i__ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f o / / I ~ ~ / , -- - - - - , I o - I I -- Ezs „ ~_ - i _ v/ F' t '~~~1 + `~ '~' ~i' ~ ~ .' [~ ? ~ 2' ~ e a' ~~ ~ ~ ] ~ ~ i~ vi I- /~ s i~ a]LI /\/ ~ r. oI / ~ S~ s - I ~~ to ~ i j C ~. , ,`~ a ~ll ~ m '~ I ~I ~ ~ t I ~' ]. ~~{ ~ _ ~ I ~ to ~. ~ C) ,_ pia Ci ~~/~ /~/ 4 ~ ,. ~ ~ 3 m ~ ~$~ ' ~ I ~ o ~~ i ti ~ / ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ 0~9 a ~' ~ T~ ~~ / i ~ r ~.k ] - ~ - ~ ~ ~ a ~_ oz ~, t;c c~ I o ~ .. oa ~ ,, ~ ~ '?Ft ti ~~n9 ~ r. / o 0 ~ ~ i ~ \ ~ ~ o ~ ~/' ~ , a ~ ti+~ ~ ~'"- u / O 4 ,. ~~ / ' _ ~ ~ ~ ,~~, - r -+\\~~ ESE SIm.' R .. - - ,. _ ~/ i - - --e - -' // _ . - - - - > ~ _ ~ - -- ~WN (9S 006 CPJ~Ew Fry ."~_'F '~nr- .. -___ E UI /YY. Po~ ~ ~ - - _ -_ ,yE r / _ , ~+3 _ - - ~j ~~ - } y ~ -. _- `P-- - ~ _ - - ~ E~'son. / ` . - - ~ o - - h __ .. _ - _ -. - _ ._ _... ----- ~~ -o--_ _. ___ ~ - - - - _. _ - - --- ~~ E.B Son. ~ - --.. ---- ~ ___. - - - --- - -- _. _ _.. __. - - _ -- - ~ --_= -- -- ~ I T - - _ - -b ---- 3E ~ -- o - z ~ -- o / i------------ ~ I' M a 4i~ I I / I o w '~ ~~ ~. ~ a ~~~: ~~_ ~ ~ ~ °a i o M ACT ~; VIi - I I q ~L•~~ `. b ~ C~ I I yiU.A o~: ~~, / ~~c~ ~w I / y Ti i"U °n~ ~n o o ~oo~ 'o'O o ° 4 pe° a ;ate a~ ~~ c ~~ o ° ~ y ~ ° ~ 4F 2j OQOR ~Q R ~O lnd~ F ~ ?~o ~ ~~ p a < w ti a q Q ` u~i ~ t n on rty °~ F- n~°~ ° 00 ° 00 ° _ 3"'9 mk~ a 21 •J d4 F °~ o rtc o ^ bu i p3 o $~y ~_ mn r- ~ s ~.o °" o u ° ~?; a ~ ~ o 2 ~~ ~ 3 0 ~~ ~.o 0 ~~ v n `a ~~~o a o~ O ~o R . rti kn3 y i J ~ F o ~ 3 o,°n~~vm t Q: N "' ` ~ y ~~ zo ;II ~ o ; ~ ~ im J ~ ¢~ ~ y ~ ~ ~' m cn A~ ~° ~ ~ °°~ 3 ~° °, ~ ~~eo x ~ y oo,°-c . 3rt~ r ~ n n ~ Z ~ ~ Nn m~ ~ o aD a~n ~~ m ~ ~ ~'° a 3t?~ '~"~ :off= c o ~I Iw .L m .,I 3 ~o ° F . o'o °, o° O ` $$ B~"~ ^^Z VJ O ~ 2 ~ O~ O J F . j SON O ~~ ° ~ N R O O m a m as F O ' ~ ~ F m ~ ~ p` ~ ~ ~ .?O b ~. N o i R m y ~ io ~ v y~ °~ o ~3~0 ~ ~ ~ 2Z Q~ 'O 300 N '4 n' ~*°m o" v y 'C n ~< L o a am 3 ~ 3a ~ °°^.m° 5 ~ ti ~ ~ z° a '°' °i u 3 °''' w ~ U ` C ` iv 2 ~ R ~ ~ ~ y J rd ,~ ~ I ~~ I i ~ '' ~. ~ :~ ~ /j ~;;, ~ c~ c3 I i I ~' a ~~ I Q'i ~ ~~ I I I '• o° I c; I I I o I ~-. ----- -- - o I ~ o/ ~~ ~~ o~ j L 7 i~ ~ ~I i ~ ~ ~ q 1 ~~ i ~ o~ ~ ' ~ , w ~ i ~ __ ~~.. o ~ W3 i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . _~ -. _, -- -~- - - ~Qo ~~~s ~ i ~ ~ = - ~ o -.~3 .,.- i j ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ i i ' / ! /k n Y.,-- C~ r /(a ~ ,, \ ~ - 905 __ 4"~ ,Py--. I I" u ; 7~ ~ - ~ ~ _ ~ - - - -- - - ~ I i i ~~-~~D ~ ~ - ~~~ ~f~ / ~~ D~ ~ ~~ u o o u n ?i - JIhD°, f~~ ~ I b~ggao C~ .~. ~~ / / ~o`Q~ ~ % vniti°o° ~~ ~m m / . c., ~ O ~ _ ~ ~~~~ b, o~ ~ ~ ~ 7 / ~ P j~ / ~ / ~ / y / ~ °o ¢ I~ ~ £ f ~~~ J ~ ~ v Foe , a~~- viz ~, ~ r ~o ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / C / L I / / ~ 1 / __~ ~ ~ '~~ / ~ 1 ,- "'~-~~ _ ,-~ - i ~ ~~ _ ~ ~e~ - l C L l 7 ~ ' a ~ ~ m 7 ~ 1 ~ --- a°' e° 9c f ~ ~y l ~ ~ ~-y ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ - NQ520 J6 ~. / e ~~ ~ ti ~ 4 ~P, Sf ~ ~~ ~' ~ ~ 97~~ ~- ~j--~ ____ __-- ~ o - ~; k. ~~ ' ) t ~ I', I ~~ ~S ~ 1 / _ ~ 7858 ~,$v~ ~~~ ~'~ I ~ ~ ~ - - - _-- ~~ - ~ - ~ - ~ ~~- ~b'o ' ~~ ,_ ~ r ~ ~ ~Y ~~, ~Ir ~ , `3 y , y. ;'~ I ~ ~ ~- C / ~~ ,~ , , _ _ - - . . 1 ~ ~ - -o ' , 't_ S i ~ _ ~ i ~~ ~i q c ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~, _ ,~ •as..~a _ _ ~ 'G~ ~,~ a ~ a.~ ~~~~ E ~ , ,_ _ ~ 'goo °~ ., y'~ y, ~ ~~ `sz .~ q\ ~,,, / ~ , ~ ,~ -, ~,m~o~~~ ~ a ~~ ~ ` ~ ~. I ~ ~ b r~ M / ~ ~ ~~~, ~ ~ ,, ~ / ~ ° 1 ~ i ~ d ~., c~ ~ ,~ _, si I I ~ ~'~ ~ o a - _ ~ri 1 / ~ f ~ c.~ ~' .. ~/~ ~h ~ n~~~m. ~ _ ~ ~yit / - ~ ~~$i1 4 /~ ~ / 9~ C ti \ l~ - ~ h c` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 50• ~ / / ~ O ~ I I ~_. - - _ ~; _ l / ~ _ _ ____ S - "-_-_ -4 ._ ___ - 3497V - --- I I ~ --~ _. SOTS - ~f~l~, Sewer ' ~ ~ _ay5 - 17505 ..-~ ._ ~ ___ ___ __ __. __ ~ j / ~, aQ~~\~i I _ i lr A ~ _._ - ____ ._ - I 0 - __ i A p~ _.. __-_o~ I ~- - 05'i -'477Y ! P ~t/ound' / ` '~~ - ~ o - - _- C IC_gq?~T'---~- -~ ~- ~ - __ '_ _ ___ .Sewer`"'-- ._ ,.. - ._ - -___-- ~ ---~--_._ .: _(93-0060 '~~~/ - -__. ___.____~_. _____ __-_ - -- _ ._. - _. _._. o\• -- - _- - - _- ~ / / ,:' EMERgLO PggKIVAY - - o ,_ _ _. ~ / -- - _ ___ _ /' ~ - - - ~~ _ / - - - - - -- _ ~ _ ___ ~ - -_ o - _~ _. _. - - __ _ _ __. _ __ -- ~_ Ex. San. (90-008 ClP) n / ~ k-- _ -- ...._ - ._- - __ _ _ _ __ ~___ / 001 -_____- ~ PoOlj JA $f~/y ~ ~ piold__ .._ .. ___ gyn.. i i _ 2TS-CC'S?i / ~ - - -~ -- ~~ ~~~ j R, o^,R;,iE'S __--- -- s ~~ y O N oN ~ a m Z 2 ® n ~ i n ~ ~ r ~o ~ ~a o p ~ S o '^ 0 c Q S .~ ~ I ~ ~ " - __ ~ I ~ _ __ -r I \ I ~. ~ i ~ i , ~ A ~ -- ~,. A ~~.~ m I ~ I \ I, I ~~m ~~ A ~-_ A' i i~'~ ~~ -I ~ ~. .r_ ~~, { I s ~~ ~ .r ~ °os I I ~ ~ o s \ i o I '~ I ~-- ~ 's ae' I .o 'sue, ~ o~ ~~ ~~, 1, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ ti o i ~o ~ ~~ ~, ',, ~ ~ a 1 - ~ ~ v ~~ o ', o --- ~ ~ ~ v o ~'~ ~ o ° ° I -_ ._ ~ W °~ I ~~ ~ m o I ~ - ~v ~ ~ °o °' . rt n .s I w ~ Xo i l ~ ~ ~ ~-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~v ~ ~ I ~ / - _ _ /~ I i __ - y -_ __ -- -- / j ~~~ - - c ~ ~ ~~ I /~ v ~~. ,~~ ~ %o~ -, ~ / ~d~ % ~ _ -~-- _ -_ i ~ '~ ~ ip e ~, ~,a ~~ ' ~, - - _ - _ a '~~ °~o i / umR / / / qo ~ p o p ~ ~K Oti ~~~~/~i~ III ' ,, ,:- a~ ;~: I~ O O / I ~ ~ I _ I ~k p ~ '.' _ I '__ --_ I I ~ ~ I y _._ --___ _~._ 1- d ~ I ~ -__ I ~ ~ I / n / ~ I- -__-__ __~_ _~ __ ~' 0 ~° I, C ( - 9 I J ~ l •`~ L ' 'ass ~ u o~ v ° ~` ~ ~ , ~ - ~~_ ~ 2, N~-, `~00 / ,.° c Sao _. - . ` ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ti D N O C ~I' ~1m \ ~ ~ R~ . ~ ~ I ' ~ i I I 0 1 + ~ W ~ n y ~~ ~~ _° ~ ~+ ~ I I:~ ~ Ay~O ~b ~0 /~ ~ ° v a ~ ~ ~ R'~O ~" I ~. ~ ~ $ o a o - .. - .._ __.-~- u ° m \ I \.._ - - - ° -- - - _ - - - - _. _ _ _ - - ~\ ~_ ~ - - _ _. - EMERALD P -_-_ - - - - _ _- -- ARKWAY _. _. - ----------- -- _-- w -- \,,, i g ,~ -r~~ `~ °o o ° j i --- ~- - - - -- ~ Uk< -- - ~1 U ~ p °j I ~ -____~ 0 0 m a wa I \ ~ ~O~ I w~~ ~~~~ B \ ~~o oho '¢l~ I no I ~oa ~ c° ~ \ cn~? A °' ~ b I ~ ~ ° b tiOp ~ - ___ I -_ -_ a I 4ac 0 ~ ,tea -__ __-__ 2 1 . ___. ~ --- --- -- ---- ---- 3 ° o o v ~ o I ~ n ~ i ~ ~ -- 1- -- -- -- -- . e o S `-' a I o ~ 8 I I I x x x x x,i. < m Am _'~ ~ m z~ a = IAn = C _ ~ ~ (1 D ~ ; _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~i ~p w A e n n, S i ~ o is ~ N R a~2 " ~ ~ c~a' ~ ~ z ~ ' ' 3 ~ a o ¢' titi ti ti a~, ~ c~ ~ c c ~~~ q p p p, A~ A A A P '.~ ~ ~~~ 0 a A 9 k K n 5 - - a Z ~ ° n i C m 3 o i . ~ + 3 ~ m n 'n ~ M w N m 3 ~ o ~ N N S G a ° o 3 ~ 3 a n' ~ ;! v v v eo 'o ~ n m ~ ~ i O O A .. ~ .. _ °m ~ 5 5 Z H s A C m m Z Y i 5 N i°n N N f^ V1 / y~j A F C / / / ~ Op ~ Op ~ O~ M W / p0; p0~ ca D w~~ NH.mi 1o D ~ / ~ , ~m Ate," mo // / ~/ `` / / V ~ 9 N_ '° ER //~ / ~' ~`syyy ~ 8 b / 9~ / / /® ~~ / / b \` / / / `` ~OJ / / ` ~\ m m ~~ ~ /; ,' c ~ c ~ \ 6 6 !% i ~ i - ~~ --- - - -- / ~ ~ i / ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ o ~ o . •., a ~. 0 ~ ' ,~ o a ~_ a o ; 8 ; ~ ~ 1 :.: sue ARC "g~ / ~ °~ ~ o I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ // / 1/ S~ gREA~" ~ ~ -- ~ iF f~ I/I ~•I o I 7/ ' c / .:. 1 1 I ;~ - ; I( a ~ ~ ~ ~ j`, / - - ~ ~ / .' ~ ~ ,~ 5 ~' / '^ ~ /o~~ ~ ~ / '' ~ /~Q° ~ / / / ~ _ i~ _~ _ _ ~ ~ 5 / / ~, ~~ ~ - ~~~o _`_- __ _ _ '~ ~ ~ eti~~ ~/ +~ ~ TDREM -~_- _ _ ~c _ ~ - - ~ / _ '' o \ - - - - - - - 1 ~~_ .~~ -____ _ _~r- -_____ /_ / -_____ ,C2 ~~~_ - ~ - - =MERALO PARKWAY - -_ - _ ~ ~ -_ ~ ~ ~ _ - -... ~ -__ _- __ - ~ _ _ - - -- - __~ - - _ ~_ - -_ - - - / - ~~ ~ - ~ - -- -- ~ - -- - ' / ~- - - - __ I --- - - i / ~ / / J ~ w s ~ ® ® ® ® ® ® A ~ a CLIENT rw PROJECT 7TfLE SEAL Z CONSULTANTS pp N r = r ~ Z C o T1 y Q r N 1 1 C N ~m moo SCHOEDINGER S ~7 ^ p~ v R ,4, 2 ? ~ b=s , ~ ~ " x f ! x y" ~ D m , - v y ~p O ~ 1 `~ xy5` ( y(ya ` ° _ P O p ~ ~ ~ = ~ Z FUNERAL SERVICE ~Z a ~ - ~ ~ m if % ~ p N N N~ m r m DUBLIN, OHIO ? D ~ § g ~ rn ,~ Z a L/~ C~ d t~ ,~ N W ~ ~M l_J r rn z -i ~ 1'1 3 O ~ - e~ o ~, ~, ~ D 31 r, y0 ~Pu m ,T~,I ~'I r~i rrn 1 a ~~.. _ 00 L DOOcTn y m m C~ m ~ Z Z n ~ Z ~ ~ ~~OzDDo~- 4~-c() 5 y~ ~ m N 0~-- P ~~ z~~xnDO 0 m x ~ _ ~ ~ Z~p4~~c~ D'~"DDc~~oD ~ C~ ~ ~ D m m r ~ m n ~ Q D C m ~ ~ ~ `O ~ r m7~ov~z~~ ^~ ~ ~ m ~ = m m ~ Oxcn av~~~=z O m x m m~ 5 Z N C ~ m~ m X 60 m ~ ~ ~ m m Nn0 „ ~ ~ Z y ~ m ^~ 2 CT m O m C ~ m ~ m~^~ ~ m ~ y "~ C ~_ r ~ m z y Z x m ~~ J O w vrni z ~ y C c ~.. ` Z C W ,~ ^ C ~ ~ a ' z ` m 00 o~'~d < ao at N ~ v z d ~ ~ Q ~ ^ Y ' y A< ~i ~ W m ~w m ~ ,, ~ ~ 3 ~ ~' ~ O m C ~ ~ c ~ Z m TT ~~ ~ Vt 3 N _ ~ '""'~ ~ = c a r ~+ O •~ m y 2 ~• r` ~ .~ ~ m °n m ? ~ ti ~ ao ~ m N ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ C ~ O ~ ~ r ~ ~ D n ~ Ocm~~ Z - - m C Zpp~ W nD~ T in~~pD xz~ N~~m oT? Z D=SO ~ m m r ~ ~ _ mO°A r m ~ ~ C ~ m ~ m vD m ~ F z C =gym =cam ~n~ m ~ ~ m m ~ Z /~ m `I n ~ ~_ ~z0 o=D ~~r ~ N Z'n O z 0 n~ zm Z W o~ II~ m ~ I N 0 A N 0 ~~~ 0 x 0 d 0 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ r~ ~~ r 0 r~ rn D ~--I ~~'' ~r i,,~ I~ i-r o~ i ~: ~- ~~L~Nm ~ ~ T• .{` O ~ g of ~n~) -r~ -.__ if ~p i ', ~rn r- rn ~,< ~~ off ~` 10., Z ~, a: r ~ 0 Z 0 d 0 ~ ~ ~ v' N F~a W ~)) ~ ~ C ?. O ~-_ ___ __- ~I I' 1 - ~ ~ I:i .---I _____i__ I _ I~, I 1 I _ _- - 1 I~ I li I I ~I T' I, I ~ ~ u T-- -- 1 - ~__~~f . ' I ` .. ~ ~ -~ ly ~ I ~ s ~ i T I ~ I I i -- I 4 -. s i m ~ ~ I ~ ~ll~ I I i~ o ~ ~--- r ~ ~ +-- - - -' ---+ ~) 1 • -~ _i _ I .. ~~_ - - - - - ~-_- a , ~_~ %~ ~ ~ / I ~ d -~- i ~ ~'., 3 n \~ i-~ u i b~ I ~ ~ l 1 I i _. I I ~ l' ,' ~~ ~ P, r ~ p f i~ll~ ~I ~ ~ ~ i I %1 ~~ ,. -- _ _.._ ~- ,- ~xl~- - -x - - - - ~ -- - - ~ - 1_ -- o ~~ ~-----y------~ II a Y ~ONm C ~'>°p °& m ~__ _ n 0 ..... "'~ as ~~~ m 0 c m v m v 0 rn O N O O e ~ ,-. m m v .~ '., 0 a 0 0 n 0-a R Y L R ~ ~ ~ rn S ~ DA a_~ ~ ~~v m ^. IYAt ~~ 0 e~ N~ o~ 0 m N O O N ~~ 0 o~ ~~ 0 0 m n O ~: ~w~ r ~ t