04-06 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank, Inc. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No.
04-06 Passed , 20
AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 15.788
ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BALLANTRAE SECTION 3 AND KENDALL RIDGE
SECTION 2 SUBDIVISIONS, NORTH OF THE WOERNER-
TEMPLE COMMUNITY PARK, FROM R, RURAL
DISTRICT, TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT (REZONING -THE GLADE AT BALLANTRAE
- CASE NO. OS-157Z).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
State of Ohio, Jr' of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit
"A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned
Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures
contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City
of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and
said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the
earliest period allowed by law.
Passed this ~~ day o , 2006.
fit. Mayor - Presi ~ Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Land Use and Long Range Planning
I hereby certify that copies of this
Ordinance/Resolution were posted in the
City of Dublin in accordance with Section
731.25 of the Ohio Revised Code.
~_-
puty Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
AMENDMENT TO CONDITION #1 APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON 2-6-06
1. That all landscaping agreements be finalized and signed by "^+" +"
the four homeowners prior to scheduling this rezoning at City Council;
Land Use and Long Range Planning
5800 Shier-Rings Road -Dublin, Ohio 43016 1Vlemo
Phone: 614-410-4600 • Fax: 614-410-4747
CI'IT OF DUBLIN
TO: Members of Dublin City Council
FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager <~~•.~ 5 • ~
DATE: January 25, 2006
INITIATED BY: Daniel D. Bird, FAICP, Land Use and Long Range Planning Director~~~
RE: Second Reading for Rezoning Ordinance:
Ordinance 04-06 (Case No. 05-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae -Woerner-Temple
Road)
SUMMARY:
Rezoning application OS-1572 for the Glade at Ballantrae, located between the Ballantrae and Kendall
Ridge subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park, is being forwarded for second
reading. This application requests a change in zoning for 15.75 acres from R, Rural District to PUD,
Planned Unit Development District to amend the development standards to accommodate 28 single-
family lots and 3.58 acres of open space.
The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved this rezoning on January 5, 2006 with nine
conditions. The applicant has fulfilled Condition 1 and staff has verified that all agreements are finalized.
Conditions 2, 3, 7, and 9 have been addressed in the development text. Conditions 4 and 6 will be
monitored as the site develops, and Conditions 5 and 8 will be addressed at the time of final development
plan approval.
Conditions:
1) That all landscaping agreements be finalized and signed by both parties prior to scheduling this
rezoning at City Council;
2) That the plans be revised to show the northern bikepath terminating at the eastern property line and
that the applicant subtrrit a letter committing to install the southern bikepath connection through Ciry
property (Ballantrae Park);
3) That the applicant obtain an easement for the construction and maintenance of the bikepath within
Ballantrae Park or arrange for the City to accept them as their responsibility;
4) That this site comply with the current City of Dublin's Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer;
5) That the applicant consult with the City Forester prior to the final development plan submittal to
verify the preferred street tree species along with installation dates and scheduling;
6) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right of way for Street "A" and the
removal of Lot 322 be approved by Planning Commission and City Council prior to filing for
building permits;
7) That all text and plan revisions be completed prior to scheduling this rezoning at City Council;
8) That the applicant work with the City to restore the two existing stub streets in Kendall Ridge to pre-
development conditions (lawn} at the expense of the developer, subject to staff approval; and
9} That the text he revised to state that the homeowners association is an extension of the existing
Ballantrae Homeowners Association.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve the second reading of Ordinance 04-06 with the nine conditions adapted by the
Planning and Zoning Commission on January 5, 2006.
CDH
Land Use and Long Range Planning
5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016
Phone: 614-410-4600 • Fax: 614-410-4747
f,ITY f-F DUELIIV
TO: Members of Dublin City Council
FROM: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager«w-c..5•
DATE: January 17, 2006
Memo
INITIATED BY: Daniel D. Bird, FAICP, Land Use and Long Range Planning Director~~ (_
RE: First Reading for Rezoning Ordinance:
Ordinance #04-06 (Case No. OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae -
Woerner-Temple Road)
SUMMARY:
Rezoning application OS-1572 for the Glade at Ballantrae, located between the Ballantrae
and Kendall Ridge subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park, is being
forwarded for first reading. This application requests a change in zoning for 15.75 acres
from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to amend the
development standards to accommodate 28 single-family lots and 3.58 acres of open
space.
Additional information regarding this case is available for public viewing at 5800 Shier-
Rings Road in the offices of Land Use and Long Range Planning.
Following approval of the first reading, City Council then is to set a date for the public
hearing (2"d reading) on the requested change.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve the first reading of Ordinance #04-06
CDH pS SUBMITTED TO GOUNCfL
~ ~ ~ ~oR MEETING, oN f 3 ~
PLR
PCD
I-,l PLR
LI
LI ~ LI
PUD
PLR
PLR
0
< PLR
m
m
PL
Kendall Ridge Blvd
PUD
R2
R2
PLR I
PLR
R
PLR
PLR
PLR
WOE
R
R
PUD PUD
R-1 B
PUD RI
City of Dublin 05-1572 N
~~
Land Use and The Glade at Ballantrae
Long Range Planning o soo si
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
' 1 '~ _ -_~~~ :~ - -_ _ _ _- - _ _ _ _ _
i ~y _ _ _ - _ ~ - - __ _ _ _
--7- - -- - -~ - -~ ~- _ -- _._ .- ~, -- - - -
i i i -- - - _ _ -- - - ~_ - --
•~- OPEN SPACE/ ~ `-_. -' ~ _
ARONSCOURT / ., ~ RESERVE'A' !!s. ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~
l ./-35B AC 'EXISTING
t PARK _ l
z._ 1 '._ ~` li 1
\. SEE SH OF4- f 1t _~ _~ - _ ~ ~- ~ '~\ \
FOR RES V 'A' DETAiI _i ~~
~. ~~ EE i _ 15
~ _ - v _ _ I
1 e l ~ 6 RES ; MEj1G N DR.
i ~ wiz _ ~
/ _ M_ 24 _~_ A _ ~ .- non 1 -i _ _
_ ~ ,., D ~ '°`- is '° •~~' ° ` •j I m _ _ _
.v~ •
a~ 26 ~ p 4 1 ~
_ 1 1 ~ { _
1 ~ ti, A e
u i~ ~ ; .
• SEE NOTE'G 27 19 18 v -
1 D ___-
10 ; 8 ~O
`m
SEE NO~E'G • ~ ~
_ V. /7 ~ 8
~I S .. ,~ I _ _ -_
,l 1 _
C~, L.
-_
I. - _ -
v, 4 a 13 8 r"1 _ I ~ ~ ~ L~~
~ U
I ", 1 RESERVE _ - - _.
~~ 2 ° /-0.01 AC _
,Q~
~ ~n ~~
--
1 '
8' PATH i _
SEE SHE 4 4 - - -' - -
FOR B ~ TA1L ~ ~
_i ~ ~
_ / ~ I
~• o
a
'° ~~ ! y ~ - ~ 0 < OS-1572
~~` o - The Glade at Ballantrae
- ~
CITY OF DUBL[N_
land Use and
tang Nonge Planning
5800 St~ier~tings Road
Dublin. Ohio 430161 Z36
Ptwne/ tiJO: 61 a-a 10-4y0p
fax: 614410-d747
web Site: www dubinnh.us
EXHIBIT "B"
REZONING APPLICATION
(Code Sedion 153.234)
TO EXPIRE
ORDINANCE NUMBER °~ 't/~ O ~
CITY COUNCIL (FIRST READING) f ~3 O
CITY COUNCIL (PUBLIC HEARING)
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
NOTE: Applicants are highly encouraged to contact Land Use and Long Range Planning for assistance and to discuss the
Rezoning process prior to submitting a formal application.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Amount Received:
oo Applig/ti-on~No:
7 ~
~ ~ ~ PSZ Date(s): PSZElction:
L
l
~ S ~ -, /
~
[
Receipt No: ~~ MIS Fee No: Date Received: Received By:
Type of Request:
~eZGY~~n ~ J~iC li/» rnc;Z7'Y ~e veJo _ r~-~~~/
/~~~-s`''
N, S, ~ W (Cirde) S~ie of: •~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 1 1 „ i~
Distance from Nearest Intersection: `2~ FEET, Y ~Vi VS, E, W (Cirde) from Nearest Intersection
Nearest Intersection: AND
•~,r~r'1SC Ut.~rd In/o1-y Ihro~r n eT - ~en~t~t~ 2d
PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION:
AS SUBMITTEp ~ CpUNgt
PD Preliminary Development Plan (Section 153.053) : + !
.FOR MEETING ON . ~ ~~ .
^ Other (Please Describe)
PRnPFRTY INFARMATInN- This saclinn must ha rnmnlPtPA
PropeAy Address:
aronscourt Way
Tax ID/Parcel Number(s): Parcel Size:
274-000013 (Acres) 15.~y6
Existing Land Use Development:
Vacant
Proposed Land Use Development:
~S - ~ S7 ~
Single-Family
Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: Total Aaes to be ezoned:
R PLR 15.9
Page 1 of 5 LAND USE EI
LONG RANGE PLANNING
111.
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vianity:
See Attached
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Ptan and, 'rf applipble, how the proposed rezoning
meets the criteria for Planned Districts [Section 153.052(6)):
HAS A PREVIOUS APPLICATION TO REZONE THE PROPERTY BEEN DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL WITHIN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS?
^ YES ~ NO
If yes, list when and state the basis for reconsideration as noted by Section 153234(A)(3):
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMEM PLAN ATTACHED? t~ YES ^ NO
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? DYES ^ NO
Page 2 of 5
The proposed development is just east of the 624-acre Dublin golf course community,
Ballantrae. Section 3 of Ballantrae is directly west of the proposed development and consists of
41.279 acres and 85 single-family lots_ East of the proposed development is Kendall Ridge. To
the south is Ballantrae Park and to the north is the Dublin Municipal facility. Homesites for this
development are sized from a minimum of 70 feet to 90 feet at the building. The proposal
includes aneight-foot bike path connecting both open space to the north and south_
j
ZONING DESCRIPTION
15.995 ACRES
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey
Number 3004, being a part of the 36.748 acre tract conveyed to City of Dublin by deed of record in
Instrument Number 200211180294003, and part of Kendall Ridge Boulevard, as recorded in Plat Book
90, Page 38, (all references are to the records of the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio) and being
more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the common corner of Reserve "B" of "KENDALL RIDGE SECTION 2", as
recorded in Plat Book 93, Page 85 and said 36.748 acre tract, being in the south line of the 16.96 acre
tract conveyed to The Board of Education, Dublin City School District by deed of record in Instrument
Number 199709170095760;
Thence South 03° 03' OS" East, a distance of 1105.79 feet, with an easterly line of said 36.748
acre tract, to the northwesterly comer of said Kendall Ridge Boulevard;
Thence North 86° 56' S5" East, a distance of 120.00 feet, with the northerly right-of--way line of
and across said Kendall Ridge Boulevard, to a point;
Thence South 03° 03' OS" East, a distance of 75.00 feet, across said Kendall Ridge Boulevard, to
a point;
Thence South 86° 56' S5" West, a distance of 120.00 feet, across and with the southerly right-of-
way line of said Kendall Ridge Boulevard, to the southwesterly corner thereof, in an easterly line of said
36.748 acre tract;
Thence South 03° 03' OS" East, a distance of 448.77 feet, with an easterly line of said 36.748 acre
tract, to a point;
Thence South 85° 09' OS" West, a distance of 393.81 feet, across said 36.748 acre tract, to a point
in the westerly line of said 36.748 acre tract, being the line common to said Virginia Military Survey
Number 3004 and Virginia Military Survey Number 3453;
Thence North OS° 03' 19" West, a distance of 1080.60 feet, with said westerly line, and with said
VMS line, to an angle point;
Thence North OS° 12' S4" West, a distance of 545.92 feet, continuing with said westerly line, and
with said VMS line, to the northwesterly corner of said 36.748 acre tract;
Thence North 84° 51' S7" East, a distance of 452.31 feet, with the southerly line of said 36.748
acre tract, to the POINT OF BEGINNING, containing 15.995 acres of land, more or less.
This description is for zoning purposes only, and is not to be used for deed transfer.
EVANS, MECHWART HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC.
nyr:mWin~gos
ts_v~s a~ ~ aozza_a«
Proximity Report Results
Proximity Report Results
The selection distance was 300 feel
The selected parcel was 274-000013.
To view a table showing the 119 parcels
within the displayed proximity, scroll down.
:~ Print Window
Back to Proximity Report
Yage 1 of 4
Disclaimer
This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county- It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other public records and data. Users of
this map are notified that the public primary information source should be consulted for verification of the infonmation contained on this map. The county and the
mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepandes.
Proximity Parcels
Hint: To copy this report to another program:
1. Hold down the left mouse buttton over the top-left corner of the area you want to get.
2. Drag the mouse to the bottom-left corner of the desired area.
3. Let go of the mouse button.
4. Select Edit Copy from the menu bar.
You can then Paste the report into another application.
Parcel Owner Name
273-009558 ACKLEY BARRY D & KELLY L
274-000188 AEBKER PAUL T
273-009559 AICHELE ANDREW L AICHELE STACY A
274-000240 AKULA SRINIVAS AKULA PRATHIBHA
274-000214 ALESSANDRO MARK PACE JESSICA
273-009522 APPIKATLA VARAHA N APPIKATLA APARNA
274-000911 ARNDT TAMARA A M ARNDT GREGORY A
274-000921 BAKER BRAD A BAKER CHRISTI A
274-000172 BAKER JEANNE
274-000190 BEVINAHALLYSHIVABASAPPA ET AL
273-009521 BLAIR JOHN A ET AL
http://209.51. 193.89/scripts/mw5rer.pl ~~~
Address
6279 RUTH ANN CT
5973 VARWYNE DR
6271 RUTH ANN CT
6031 VARWYNE DR
6312 CORLEY DR
6265 PIRTHSHIRE
5932 BARONSCOURT WY
5852 BARONSCOURT WY
6249 CORLEY DR
5989 VARWYNE DR
6273 PIRTHSHIRE CIR
.~p Search Real Estate Search Auditor Home
Image Date: Thu Sep 1 14:52:37 2005
ROPERTY OWNERS WITHINT 300 FEE
• ~~~-
ACKLEY BARRY D & KELLY L 6279 RUTH ANN CT DUBLIN, OH 43016
AEBKER PAUL T 5973 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
AICHELE ANDREW L AICHELE STACY A 6271 RUTH ANN CT DUBLIN, OH 43016
AKULA SRINIVAS AKULA PRATHIBHA 6031 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
ALESSANDRO MARK PACE JESSICA 6312 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
APPIKATLA VARAHA N APPIKATLA APARNA 6265 PIRTHSHIRE CIRCLE DUBLIN, OH 43016
ARNDT TAMARA A M ARNDT GREGORY A 5932 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
BAKER BRAD A BAKER CHRISTI A 5852 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
BAKER JEANNE 6249 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
BEVINAHALLYSHIVABASAPPA ET AL 5989 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
BLAIR JOHN A ET AL 6273 PIRTHSHIRE CIRCLE DUBLIN, OH 43016
BOB WEBB BALLANTRAE LLC 7662 NORTH CENTRAL DR LEWIS CENTER, OH 43035
BUCCI JOSEPH A III 6409 WOERNER TEMPLE RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
C V PERRY BUILDERS LLC 370 S. FIFTH STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
CANESTRARO CARL R CANESTRARO MONICA 6341 VARWYNE D DUBLIN, OH 43016
CHINNAPPAN RAKKIYAPPAN CHINNAPPAN B 5843 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
CITY OF DUBLIN 6363 WOERNER TEMPLE RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
CITY OF DUBLIN 6501 WOERNER TEMPLE RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO 6351 SHIER RINGS RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO 6555 SHIER RINGS RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
CLARK CAROLYN H 5908 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
CURTIS JACK R CURTIS SUSAN B 6485 BALLANTRAE PL DUBLIN, OH 43016
DALBENZIO FRANK D DALBENZIO JONELLE 6339 MEAGHAN DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
DIBLASIO JOHN A 6329 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
DISALVO MICHAEL G DISALVO REBECCA 5812 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
DOWNS MATTHEW C 6280 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
DUBLIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BD OF E 6371 SHIER RINGS ROAD DUBLIN, OH 43017
DUBLIN MANOR LLC 15 CLAIREDEN PLACE POWELL, OH 43065
DUFFY HOMES INC 8760 ORION PL, #100 COLUMBUS, OH 43240
EDWARDS GOLF COMMUNITIES LLC 5779 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
EDWARDS GOLF COMMUNITIES LLC 495 S. HIGH ST, #150 COLUMBUS, OH 43215
EGOLF ALAN R EGOLF PAMELA R 6296 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
ESTEPP STEVEN E 6087 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
FATHI ALIREZA FATHI CECELIA 6240 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
FRIZZIE GALEN T JR FRIZZIE SOKHENG 5859 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
GEORGE DAVID L GEORGE CARMEN M 6313 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
GHOORKHANIAN FARIBORZ EMAMI MANDANA 6331 MEAGHAN DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
GORCOFF GARY M GORCOFF SANDRA 6297 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
GRANT STUART C 6024 ANNA LOOP DUBLIN, OH 43016
GREGOR ROBERT J GREGOR TERRI L 5957 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
HAROLD DANA T HAROLD AARON A 6305 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
HARTMAN JAMES W & WENONAH J 6445 WOERNER TEMPLE RD DUBLIN, OH 43016
HIGH LINDA S HIGH ALAN P 6265 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
HODROGE KAZEM 6340 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
JESTER THOMAS ]WILSON JEANNIE M 6281 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
JL CUSTOM HOMES INC 2950 E. BROAD ST COLUMBUS, OH 43209
KAISER LANCER 6336 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
KALMAR ROBERT L & LISA D YEE 6263 RUTH ANN CT DUBLIN, OH 43016
~/v
PROPERTY OWNERS WITHINT 300 FED
~
KONDO TETSUJI & ELIZABETH •~~-
6274 RUTH ANN CT
DUBLIN, OH 43016
KRAWCZYK JOHN TR KRAWCZYK CECILIA R 6260 PIRTHSHIRE CIRCLE DUBLIN, OH 43016
LAMBERJACK DAVID H LAMBERJACK KRIST 5924 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
LANZ WILLIAM C KOHL JESSICA L 6328 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
LEMMON ALEXIS W III BROWN SARAH E 5860 BARONSCOURT W DUBLIN, OH 43016
LEONARD TONYA M CARMACK MICHAEL 8 5997 KENDALL RIDGE DUBLIN, OH 43016
LEWIS BRIAN K LEWIS REGINA M 6320 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
LOEFFLER MICHAEL P LOEFFLER REBECCA 6289 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
LUCIANI BUILDERS INC 336 AVON COURT DUBLIN, OH 43017
M/I HOMES OF CENTRAL OHIO LLC 3 EASTON OVAL, SUITE 240 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
MADDRIX BETTIE F TR 6023 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MAHONEY THOMAS W III 6071 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MAPLE ROBERT J MAPLE CATHERINE J 5950 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MASON SHAWN A MASON LAURA M 6337 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MAY JOSEPH J MAY RENEE M 6304 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MCCALL JOHN D 6055 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MCCARTY PAMELA A TR 5811 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
MCCUE MARK A MCCUE KELLY A 5804 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
MEHTA RAN]U MEHTA SANJAY 5884 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
MILLER DAVID E MILLER MICHELLE A 5788 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
MONEYPENNY PHILIP C 6257 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MOOREHEAD LAURA L 5965 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
MOSER MICHAEL R MOSER CAROA K 6062 ANNA LOOP DUBLIN, OH 43016
MYERS MICHAEL A MYERS JODY S 6344 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
NANDAKUMAR TANJORE S NANDAKUMAR CHI 6268 PIRTHSHIRE CIRCLE DUBLIN, OH 43016
NOSSE JOHN R 6032 ANNA LOOP DUBLIN, OH 43016
NUNATA ATSUSHI NUBATA MASAE 6333 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
PADGETT CONNIE A 6293 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
PERRY C V BUILDERS II LLC 370 S. FIFTH STREET' COLUMBUS, OH 43215
PESALA SURENDRABABU V PESALA PRASUN 5851 SANDY RINGS DUBLIN, OH 43016
PFEIFER JAMES E II 6321 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
PRABHALA VIKRAM RENDUCHINTALA SRILA 6079 VARWYN DUBLIN, OH 43016
PRIESTLAND JONATHAN D PRIESTlAND HE 6070 ANNA LOOP DUBLIN, OH 43016
PROEGLER KURT C PROEGLER CAROL G 5867 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
PUGH DANIEL P PUGH MARTHA J 5916 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
R J CHEVIE BUILDERS LLC 411 E NORTH BROADWAY COLUMBUS, OH 43214
RAWLINS RANDALE R 6301 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
REILLY KEVIN M REILLY PAMELA S 5923 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
ROMERO RAYMOND R ROMERO SAENGDAO 5875 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
ROSEHILL HOMES LLC 8433 GREENSIDE DRIVE DUBLIN, OH 43017
ROTH RANDALL R ROTH TARA A 6309 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
SALVATI CARA M 6047 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
BEAVER JOHN BEAVER MARIELLE 5949 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
SMITH CHRISTOPHER M SMITH MARCIE L 5981 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
SMITH SCOTT P SMITH LISA G 5827 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
SWANKOSKI LEONARD J @(2) 5844 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
SWICKARD ENTERPRISES INC 3730 BROADWAY GROVE CITY, OH 43123
TARR SHAWN L 6332 KENDALL RIDGE BLVD DUBLIN, OH 43016
~~~
~ROPERTY OWNERS WITHINT 300 FE~
~
TEKANCIC SCOTT H TEKANQC JESSICA •~~-
5820 BARONSCOURT W
DUBLIN, OH 43016
LINGER MELANIE S & DOYLE A 6266 RUTH ANN CT DUBLIN, OH 43016
WEEKS RICHARD H II WEEKS LORIN T 5796 BARONSCOURT WY DUBLIN, OH 43016
WEINANDY JEREMY J 6039 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
WHITE BRIAN N WHITE JILL M 6015 VARWYNE DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
WILLIAMSON JAMES L WILLIAMSON RUBY 5907 BARONSCOURT WAY DUBLIN, OH 43016
WILSON DEREK R 6241 CORIEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
WINTRINGER GEORGE D WINTRINGER JANE 6063 VARWYNE DUBLIN, OH 43016
ZUCHOWSKI ANDREW T 6273 CORLEY DR DUBLIN, OH 43016
IY. PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR INfT1AL STAFF REVIEW: Please submit large (24x36) and smelt (11x17) sets of plans. Staff
may later request plans that incorporate review comments. Fourteen (14) additional copies of revised sutxnittals are required for the Plarming and
TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS AND THIRTEEN (13) COPIES Please notarize agent authorization, if necessary.
FOURTEEN (14) COPIES OF A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY J~ ~ )j IT ~ B'~` (fir;
FOURTEEN (14) TAX PARCEL ID MAPS indicating property owners and parcel numbers for all parcels within 500 feet of the sde.
TEN (10) SCALED, SITEISTAKING PLANS SHOWING:
a. North arrow and bar scale.
b. Location, size and dimensions of all existing and proposed conditions and structures {signficant natural features, landscaping,
structures, additions, decks, access ways, parking).
c. Proposed uses (Regional transportation system, densities, number of dwellings, building unit types, square footages, parking, open
space, etc.).
d. Size of the site in acreslsquare feet.
e. AN property lines, setbacks, street centeriines, rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the site-
f. Existing and proposed zoning district boundaries.
g. Use of land and location of structures on adjacent properties.
IF APPLICABLE, TEN (10) COPIES OF THE FOLLOWING SCALED PLANS:
Grading Plan.
Landscaping Plan.
Lighting Plan_
Utility andlor Stormwater Plan.
Tree Survey, Tree Preservation and Tree Replacement Plans.
V.
IF APPLICABLE, TEN (10) COPIES OF SCALED, ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS with proposed colors and materials noted.
IF APPLICABLE, FOUR (4) COPIES OF SCALED DRAWINGS INDICATING:
a. Location of signs and sign type (wall, ground, projecting, or window).
b. Sign dimensions, inducting letter sizes and proposed distance from sign to grade.
c. Copy layout and lettering styles (fonts) of signage.
d. Materials and manufacturer to be used in fabrication.
e. Total area of sign face (including frame).
f. Type of illumination.
MATERIAUCOLOR SAMPLES (swatches, photos, plans, or product spedfications). Indude manufacturer name and number.
n~uTV+~ ~n~ iC ~OA~COTV AW~.I000• ~L,.,.-., .,«~..r, ~aAh~....~~ ~hmr~ ~r
It is the policy of the City of Dublin to notify surrounding property owners of pending applications under public review. List all neighboring property
owners within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property based on the County Auditors current tax Gst. Electronic copies of lists are encouraged.
PROPERTY OWNER
(not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS C(TY/STATE2IP CODE
___
See Attached ~/
~X ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ `'Z
Page 3 of 5
VI. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the property by City representatives are essential to process this application. The
Owner/Applicant, as notarized below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this
application.
VII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid
growth of the City of Dublin and surrounding vicinities has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services to the limit As such, the City of
Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the applicant until some further date. The Owner/Applicant acknowledges the
approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Councl does not constitute a guarantee or
binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by the said
Owner/Applicant.
Vlfl.
urr~~w nn1 1/11 w1T 161CA 011dAT1AA1- TL.io oo.-K.,n mucf hn ~mm~lnfa~i
t'KVI'CRI i v~rlrcfVlirrua.r~1~1 uv v.~mr...v... •r~----~ -
Current Property Owner/Applicant:
Mailin Address_
(Street, City, State, Zip Code) ~? ~L ~j~yt~,--r~c~f U ~k Vv ~i~}~J~~ n ~~ ~ `~ ~~"~ 7
Daytime Telephone: i Fax:
~ 1 C~ - ~i ~i~~-` ~i ~~ _ 4 4 9 L'
Email or Alternate Contact Information:
Page 4 of 5
IX.
REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF OWNER: Please complete 'd applicable. Attach additional sheets for muttiple representatives.
Representative:
enant, Archked, Designer, Contractor, etc.) ~WQ ~
~C~ S CC~ i'~'1l3'it>n ! ~ ~
Mailing Address:
(street. city. state. zip Code) LI ~ ~ 5 . ~ - h
~d - r# l ~ ~l~rn ~JU~ U1~ 13 2/s
Daytime Telephone:
' - ~ - 2 c 7 ~ Fax:
~ /~~ - Z ~i / ~ Z~~_
Email or Attemate Contact InfortnaGon:
Who is the PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON for this application?
X.
X.
AUTHORt2AT10N FOR OWNER'S AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE(S): Please
1 _~~C~i'lt_ S _ ~~ C~--t-t h c~ i~l ~ ~ Y~y M G-i'L 0. q~~ ,the owner, hereby authorize
~e~J-r1Q,11 Idc~dc-~ rl ~~l(~.Tje-S ~~'~SCoII to ad as my representative(s) in all
matters rtaining to the processing and pproval of this application, inducting modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and
agreements made by the designated representative.
Signature of CurteM Property Owner.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5~ day of
State of /7 /11.(~
County of 1 Jb ~ti~~"`~~
APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be
Date:
This section must be notarized.
~5
20 ~S
Notary Public
and notarized.
1 Stephen Hadden ~
the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached r
respects true and correct, to 1heJRest of my knowledge and tjetief.
Signature of Owner or
Authorized Representative:
Date:
RACHAEL M. METH
ative, have read and understand
submitted is complete and in all
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~ day of ~t-r~`~~ , 20 O r~
r~ ~ sjn~S
County of r/ >~'n ::~p,AIAC ,~j(Qtary Public
~ l i
_ _ ERYN R. TINKLER(~~~s~
M - - Notary Pttblic, State of o io
•- ~^-' = My Commission Fires 08-26-07
~~~)_ -
NOTE: THE PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON ti11fLL RECEIVE A FACSIMILE CONFIRMING RECEIPT OF THIS APPLICATION
State of d hro
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF DUBL[N_
Lad Use ad
lag Raage Plug
5800 Shier-R-mgs Road
" "in, Ohio 43016-1236
e: 614-410-4600
..w 614-410-4]41
Weh xte: www.dublia.oh.us
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
JANUARY 5, 2006
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
5. Rezoning - OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae
Location: 15.788 acres located between the Ballantrae Section 3 and Kendall Ridge Section 2
subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park.
Existing Zoning: R, Rural District
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District,
under the provisions of Section 153.053.
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development consisting of 28 units and 3.58 acres
of open space.
Applicant: The City of Dublin, c/o Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, 5200 Emerald Parkway,
Dublin, Ohio 43017 and The Edwards Land Company, c/o Charles Driscoll and Stephen
Hadden, 495 S. High Street, Suite 150, Columbus, Ohio 4321 S.
Staff Contact: Claudia Husak, Planner.
Contact Information: (614) 410-4675/Email: chusak@dublin.oh.us.
MOTION: To approve this rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan) because this proposal extends
Ballantrae, a successful residential development, will provide parkland, which will facilitate a
consolidated open space plan that includes the future Kendall Ridge Park and is consistent with the
recommendations of the Community Plan, with nine conditions:
Conditions:
1) That all landscaping agreements be finalized and signed by both parties prior to
scheduling this rezoning at City Council;
2) That the plans be revised to show the northern bikepath terminating at the eastern
property line and that the applicant submit a letter committing to install the southern
bikepath connection through City property (Ballantrae Park);
3) That the applicant obtain an easement for the construction and maintenance of the
bikepath within Ballantrae Park or arrange for the City to accept them as their
responsibility;
4) That this site comply with the current City of Dublin's Stormwater Regulations, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer;
Page 1 of 2
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
JANUARY 5, 2006
5. Rezoning - OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae (Continued)
5) That the applicant consult with the City Forester prior to the final development plan
submittal to verify the preferred street tree species along with installation dates and
scheduling;
6) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right of way for Street "A"
and the removal of Lot 322 be approved by Planning Commission and City Council
prior to filing for building permits;
7) That all text and plan revisions be completed prior to scheduling this rezoning at City
Council;
8) That the applicant work with the City to restore the two existing stub streets in Kendall
Ridge to pre-development conditions (lawn) at the expense of the developer, subject to
staff approval; and
9) That the text be revised to state that the homeowners association is an extension of the
existing Ballantrae Homeowners Association.
* Charles Driscoll, agreed to the above conditions_
VOTE: 6 - 0.
RESULT: This rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan) application was approved.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
~~C4~LL t'~ ~h ~/. ~~"J ~/~
Claudia Husak
Planner
Page 2 of 2
LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT
AS PER CONDITION #1
~~ 't'he
C~ ~dwaxds
~ hand Company
495 South f~i`It Strcct -Suite l5p - C:a{uin!>u,, t}hiu X3215-7G19 (fi 14) 241-2070 ' ~'AX (G14) 241-?~80
T,}ecembez 9, 2045
Mr. and Mrs. Raymond and Saengdao Romero
5875 8a.r~nscourt Vl~ay
Dublin, OH, 43016
pear Mr. and N1rs. Romero:
As we discussed, in return for your support of our zoning of the Glade at Ballantrae property, we
are willing to install lax~,dscapitag in your fxont yard to shield ycsur windows from headlights- The
and will he paid to you upon final
amount of the reimbursertaer-t will be _ ~.. _
approval of our rezoning. If this rineets with your approval, please sign and return one copy of
this letter to me.
Please call toe if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
TH1E EDWAP.DS LAND COMPANY
~ (~,
tC.~1'
y~ J<~ ,trt~r ~ _ . _ . _ ~. _. .. .. ,
Charles P. Driscoll
President
Agreed axed Accepted
~~`
(--2-06
Date
STAFF REPORT
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JANUARY 5, 2006
CTfY OF DUBLIN_
Land Use and
Loeg Range Pknaieg
5800 Shier-Rings Road
i, Ohio 43016-123b
I ;:614-410-4b00
kx: 614-410-4141
Weh Site: www-dublin.oh.us
5. Rezoning OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae
Location: 15.788 acres located between the Ballantrae Section 3 and Kendall Ridge
Section 2 subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park.
Ezisting Zoning: R, Rural District.
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development
District, under the provisions of Section 153.053.
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development consisting of 28 units and 3.58
acres of open space.
Applicant: The City of Dublin, c/o Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, 5200 Emerald
Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and The Edwards Land Company, cJo Charles Driscoll
and Stephen Hadden, 495 South High Street, Suite 150, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Claudia Husak, Planner.
Contact Information: (614) 410-4675/Email: chusak@dublin.oh.us.
UPDATE:
On November 10, 2005, the Commission tabled this case after extensive discussion regarding
traffic calming efforts on Baronscourt Way and contacting adjacent property owners about
screening to counteract headlight trespass. The applicant and staff met with the neighborhood on
December 14, 2005 to discuss traffic calming. A summary letter of the meeting outcome was
sent to the invited residents indicating that traffic calming would not be utilized on Baronscourt
Way (See letter dated December 19, 2005). The applicant has since revised the text to address
the headlight trespass screening and provided letters of agreement from two of the three adjacent
property owners. Staff understands that the third property owner and the applicant are currently
finalizing an agreement as well.
BACKGROUND:
Case Summary:
This is a request to rezone a 15.75-acre site from R, Rural District, to PUD, Planned Unit
Development District. The applicant is proposing 28 single-family lots and 3.58 acres of open
space. A Concept Plan for this development was heard at the Planning and Zoning Commission
on July 21, 2005 (See Case 04-153CP). Staff is recommending approval of this application with
conditions.
Dublin Planning and Zon Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page2of7
Case Procedure:
As described in Section 153.050, the purposes of the new Planned Development District
regulations are to:
1) Provide an opportunity for a mix of land uses otherwise not permitted within the standazd
municipal zoning district classifications;
2) Allow the creation of development standazds that respect the unique characteristics, natural
quality and beauty of the site and the immediate vicinity and protect the community's natural
resources by avoiding development on, and destruction of sensitive environmental areas;
3) Enable greater review of design chazacteristics to ensure that the project is properly
integrated into its surroundings and is compatible with adjacent development;
4) Assure compatibility between proposed land uses within and around the Planned
Development District through appropriate development controls;
5) Pursue the housing and economic development goals of the City;
6) Promote economical and efficient use of land and reduce infrastructure costs through unified
development;
7) Provide for supporting community facilities; and
8) Establish objective criteria for development plan review that ensure conformity to
community and district standazds and allow for consistent treatment throughout.
The procedures established for the new Planned Development Districts continue to provide for
proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land
planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles, using imaginative azchitectural
design and flexibility in building styles. The new PUD process may consist of up to three basic
stages:
1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and/or City Council review and comment);
2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission
recommends and City Council approves/denies); and
3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves/denies).
A preliminary development plan shall be reviewed by staff and forwarded to the Planning and
Zoning Commission for review and action. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review
the application to determine compliance with the approval criteria set forth in 153.055(A) and
repeated below. Upon review the Planning and Zoning Commission shall ultimately forward the
plan to City Council with a recommendation for approval, a recommendation for approval
subject to conditions, or a recommendation for disapproval. City Council shall review the
proposal and conduct a public hearing before rendering its decision. Adopting the plan shall
constitute a rezoning of the property and allow the applicant to proceed with detailed preparation
of the final development plan.
Review Criteria:
In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following
criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning):
1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of
the Dublin Zoning Code;
2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan,
Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not
unreasonably burden the existing street network;
Dublin Planning and Zon. ,Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 3 of 7
3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity
and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the
surrounding areas;
4) The proposed uses aze appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property
within and adjacent to the azea will be safeguarded;
5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space azeas that meet the
objectives of the Community Plan;
6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and
protects the natural resources of the site;
7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or
are being provided.
8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to
minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety
and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed
development provides for a safe, convenient and non-conflicting circulation system for
motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians;
9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides
for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger
community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community;
10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between
buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking
areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of
the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City;
11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain,
as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage azeas;
12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify
any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning
Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent
of the Planned Development District regulations;
13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the
surrounding area and all applicable appeazance standazds of the City;
14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed
infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the
intended overall development;
15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public
improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the azea; and
16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the
Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Site Characteristics:
Site Description. The 15.75-acre site is rectangular in shape, with a width of
approximately 425 feet from east to west and a length of 1,620 feet. It is the northern
portion of a lazger, 36.75-acre L-shaped tract located between the Ballantrae and Kendall
Ridge subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park. The only natural
feature on this property is a partial tree row at the southwest comer of the site.
Dublin Planning and Zom .Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page4of7
Zoning Description. The site is currently zoned R, Rural District. To the east is the
Kendall Ridge subdivision and to the west is the Ballantrae subdivision both zoned PLR,
Planned Low-Density Residential District. To the north is the Dublin City Schools' Bus
Complex, zoned LI, Limited Industrial District, and to the south is the Woerner Temple
Community Park, zoned R, Rural District.
• Neighborhood Meeting. Based on concerns raised by the Commission, the applicant and
staff held a meeting with adjacent property owners on December 14, 2005 regazding the
need for traffic calming on Bazonscourt Way. Five of the 25 invited households attended
and reviewed possible traffic calming devices (See Sign-Up Sheet). The residents in
attendance were unanimously opposed to the implementation of any traffic calming
device on Bazonscourt Way. The residents believed that the issue with speeding is
temporary, and felt that targeted, increased enforcement by Dublin Police would
encourage speed limit compliance. Staff has contacted the Police Chief to relay this
information and informed all invited households of the outcome of this meeting (See
letter dated December 9, 2005).
Property Owner Contact. Staff has been in contact with the property owners of Lot 340,
the Proegler family, by phone and email to advise them of the recent developments in this
case. The Proeglers met with staff on December 21, 2005, to review the plans and the
minutes from the November 11, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. An
agreement has been reached between the developer and the Proeglers for compensation of
landscaping to alleviate headlight trespass (See letter dated December 28, 2005).
Community Plan and Land Use:
• Land Use and Density. The Future Land Use Plan within the Community Plan (Map 8)
identifies the preferred land use for this site as "Residential-Medium Density (1-2
du/ac)." The proposed use of the site matches the intended use as specified by the Future
Land Use Map. Plans indicate a density of 1.77 dwelling units per acre with open space
and parkland dedication of 3.58 acres.
Site Layout:
• General Layout. As proposed, the site plan indicates 28 single-family lots. A short street
connects into the site from Bazonscourt Way to the west. The street terminates at the
north-south double ended cul-de-sac, which is the main street for the site. All lots back
up to the two existing subdivisions east and west of the site. The proposed 3.58 acres of
open space is located to the north of the site, adjacent to the existing open space within
Kendall Ridge.
Road Layout/Access Management. Vehicular access to this site is proposed from the east
off Bazonscourt Way in the Ballantrae subdivision. A platted and unbuilt residential lot
(Lot 322) within Ballantrae Section 3 located on the east side of Baronscourt Way will be
utilized as public right-of--way to connect to the proposed "Street A." The northern cul-
de-sac terminates at the proposed open space, and the southern cul-de-sac terminates at
the Woerner-Temple Community Park. Both cul-de-sacs open to the park and open
space, providing physical and visual access.
• Parkland/Open Space. The plans indicate 3.58 acres of open space that will be dedicated
to the City of Dublin adjacent to the future Kendall Ridge Park. Cul-de-sac islands
containing Reserves B and C will be owned and maintained by the Homeowners'
Dublin Planning and Zon. Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 5 of 7
Association. An eight-foot bike path is indicated within this proposed open space,
connecting the northeast portion of the cul-de-sac through the open space to the
intersection of Meaghan Drive and Varwyne Drive within Kendall Ridge. Staff
recommends that the plans be revised to show this bikepath terminating at the property
line and that the applicant work with the City regarding future bike path connections.
An additional eight-foot bike path is shown connecting the southern cul-de-sac to the
northeast portion of the pazking area of the Woerner-Temple Community Pazk. Staff
recommends that the applicant submit a letter committing to install this connection
through City property.
Architecture. The text states that four-sided architecture will be utilized with design
elements and details repeated on all four sides of a home. The building materials
permitted by the text include brick, stone, stucco, wood, and cementitious siding. The
applicant has revised the text to also include cultured stone as a building material. The
text states that the applicant reserves the right to present newly engineered/developed
exterior materials to the Commission for review and approval. The text also states that
azchitecturally designed homes using all stucco may be permitted, subject to the review
of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and design treatments consistent with the
architecture must also be incorporated.
Transportation:
Public Streets. Three new public streets will be created with 50 feet ofright-of--way and
28 feet of pavement back-to-back of curb. All streets will be required to have sidewalk
on both sides. The applicant will need to provide curb ramps at both points where the
proposed bike path connects to the public street.
Traffic Control. Stealth Stat data collected by staff in February 2005 on this section of
Bazonscourt Way shows that the 85~' percentile speed was determined to be 29 miles per
hour. The residents that attended the December 14, 2005 meeting with the applicant and
staff regarding traffic calming were unanimously opposed to the implementation of any
traffic calming device on Bazonscourt Way. The residents suggested increased
enforcement by Dublin Police and staff has contacted the Police Chief to relay this
information. The plans have been revised to exclude traffic calming devices.
Headlight Trespass. Based on concerns raised by the Commission, the text has been
revised to include an agreement to work with property owners of Lots 339-341 to provide
appropriate landscape screening for headlight trespass. The applicant has provided staff
and the Commission with letters of agreement to compensate two of the three property
owners for these landscape enhancements (See Landscape Agreements). Staff is awaze
that the developer and the third property owner, Raymond Romero, aze in the process of
finalizing an agreement and requests that all agreements be finalized and signed by both
parties prior to scheduling this rezoning at City Council. The landscape enhancements
will consist of evergreen trees and shrubs and this detail will be presented at the final
development plan stage.
Development Text Standards:
• Density/Setbacks. The development text permits 28 homesites on 15.75 acres at a density
of 1.77 units per acre. The proposed lots are to have a lot width between 70 and 90 feet.
The text requires varied front yard setbacks between 25 and 35 feet, a 25-foot No-Build
Dublin Planning and Zon Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 6 of 7
Zone at the rear, and seven-foot minimum side yards with the total side yard requirement
of 15 feet. All lots abutting pazkland will have a 10-foot No-Build Zone.
Bikepaths/Pedestrian Circulation. The development text states that four-foot sidewalks
will be installed in accordance with Code. Bikepaths will be eight feet and are shown on
the plans within the open space to the north and connecting to the Woerner-Temple
Community Park to the south. Staff recommends that the applicant work with the City to
obtain an easement for the new path within Ballantrae Park or arrange for the City to
accept them as their responsibility.
Parkland The required open space and pazkland dedication for this development is 1.92
acres. The proposed development shows 3.58 acres.
• Fence. The submitted plans show a fence along the northern property line of Lot 22 and
23. The text states that fencing will meet Code. A detail of this fence will be provided at
the final development plan stage.
Landscaping:
• Street Trees. The text does not specify a street tree for this site and the applicant should
consult with the City Forester prior to the final development plan to verify the preferred
street tree species and installation dates and scheduling. The text has been revised to
reflect the maximum spacing for street trees at 45 feet on center.
Tree Preservation. The site has scattered trees along the west property line that will be
protected by a 25-foot Tree-Protection-Zone along impacted lots. All existing trees must
be indicated on civil engineering drawings, and a tree replacement plan and landscaping
details will be submitted as part of the final development plan.
• Buffering/Screening. Landscape buffers are indicated on the plan along lots 8, 9, 23 and
24 adjacent to open space. In addition, the plans note that an existing buffer between this
property and the Dublin City Schools Bus Complex will be enhanced with deciduous
trees.
Utilities and Stormwater Management:
• Sanitary Sewer. An existing eight-inch sanitary line in Kendall Ridge south of Meaghan
Drive will provide sanitary sewer service. No additional sanitary flows will be directed
into the existing sanitary line along Bazonscourt Way.
Water Supply. An eight-inch water main on the east side of Bazonscourt Way will
provide the public water service.
Stormwater Management. This development will be required to comply with the current
Stormwater Regulations. A 24-inch storm sewer is located on the northwest portion of
the site, this sewer line moves eastward across the site connecting to a 42-inch storm
sewer line. This utility, along with any associated easements should be located and
shown on subsequent plans.
Platting Issues:
Plat Requirements. A revised plat for Ballantrae Section 3 will be required indicating the
removal of Lot 322 for the right-of--way dedication of proposed "Street A." The plat
should include any easements that need to be dedicated to the City.
Dublin Planning and Zon_ Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 7 of 7
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed preliminary development plan matches the Community Plan's density and land use
recommendations, and the applicant has worked with staff and adjacent residents to fulfill the
Commission's requests and address previous comments and suggestions. This proposal is an
extension of Ballantrae, a successful residential development and staff believes that the
development will be consistent with this high-quality subdivision. Staff recommends approval
of this rezoning with the following seven conditions:
Conditions:
1) That all landscaping agreements be finalized and signed by both parties prior to
scheduling this rezoning at City Council;
2) That the plans be revised to show the northern bikepath terminating at the eastern
property line and that the applicant submit a letter committing to install the
southern bikepath connection through City property (Ballantrae Park);
3) That the applicant obtain an easement for the construction and maintenance of the
bikepath within Ballantrae Park or arrange for the City to accept them as their
responsibility;
4) That this site comply with the current City of Dublin's Stormwater Regulations,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
5) That the applicant consult with the City Forester prior to the final development
plan submittal to verify the preferred street tree species along with installation
dates and scheduling;
6) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right of way for
Street "A" and the removal of Lot 322 be approved by Planning Commission and
City Council prior to filing for building permits; and
7) That all text and plan revisions be completed prior to scheduling this rezoning at
City Council.
Bases:
1) The proposed development will be an extension of a successful residential
development.
2) The proposal is consistent with the recommendations of the Community Plan.
3) The proposed development provides parkland in a convenient location, which will
facilitate a consolidated open space plan that includes the future Kendall Ridge
Park.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 5, 2006
Page 8 DRAFT
5. Rezoning - OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae
Rick Gerber swore in those who intended to testify in regards to this case.
The Commissioners chose to forego the staff presentation for this case.
Mr. Gerber asked for a brief update on this case.
Claudia Husak said the case was tabled on November 10, 2005 after an extensive discussion
concerning property owners in the vicinity of this site as well as traffic calming along
Baronscourt Way. She said staff and the applicant have initiated a meeting with residents along
Baronscourt Way to discuss traffic calming. Ms. Husak said five households attended that
meeting and the overwhelming response was that they did not want traffic calming, and they
perceived speeding along this road to be a temporary problem with construction traffic and
people who had not yet bought into the neighborhood. Ms. Husak said staff agreed with the
property owners to contact the police department and request their increased presence and
enforcement to see if that would alleviate the problem. She said staff has sent a letter
summarizing these results to all the residents on the street.
Ms. Husak said another issue was headlight trespassing for residents adjacent to the new street
going into and out of the new subdivision. She said the applicant has revised the text to include
language reflecting an agreement to work with those residents and compensate them for extra
landscaping. She said two affected property owners had come to an agreement with the
applicant, and a finalized landscape plan is still being designed for the third property owner.
Ben W. Hale, Jr., attorney representing the applicant, confirmed that two residents had agreed to
their landscape plans and the agreements were included in the Commission packets. He said he
thought the applicant had worked on everything the Commission requested at the last hearing.
Mr. Hale said they had met with the residents. He said it was discovered after the November 10
hearing that notices were not mailed. Therefore it was a good thing that the case was tabled.
Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Company, said they had ongoing discussions with the neighbors.
Kurt Proegler said issues were well covered in the minutes of the July meeting and the staff
Report. He thanked the staff for a good meeting to make up for not being able to attend the
previous meeting. He said just after Thanksgiving, his neighbor had raw sewage back up which
was a concern. Mr. Proegler said he received conflicting responses. He said he asked somebody
to provide an explanation in writing to go on record for the City, very specifically in terms of
how much, if any part of this proposed development will affect that problem. He said Aaron
Stanford provided an E-mail today stating that this proposed development will have no impact
because it is linked to a different system.
Mr. Gerber recalled that it was represented to the Commission by the applicant that there was an
agreement between Mr. Proegler and the applicant. He referred to a letter dated December 28,
2005, and asked if that was the only agreement made with the applicant.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 5, 2006
Page 9
DRAFT
Mr. Proegler said it was the only written agreement. He said they were talking since the July
meeting and certainly understood from a verbal perspective that they had assurances that some
landscaping would be done.
Mr. Proegler said that they were under the impression in November that the street was going to
be one lot to the south. He said since they found out it was to be somewhere else, they have had
to develop a second landscaping plan and that in part contributed to why it has taken a while to
get that signed agreement.
Mr. Gerber asked if the only written agreement that Mr. Proegler had with the applicant was
reflected in the letter dated December 28, 2005.
Mr. Proegler said that was correct.
Mr. Gerber recalled that at the November meeting, the Commission was told that Mr. Proegler
had an agreement with the applicant.
Mr. Proegler said they expected that it was something to be worked out.
Mr. Gerber asked again if Mr. Proegler had a written agreement with the applicant regarding
landscaping.
Mr. Proegler said he did not.
Mr. Gerber asked staff about the sewer backup in that area. He asked if there was enough
capacity for this proposed new development. He said it was suggested that there was not.
Aaron Stanford said Mr. Proegler had made him aware of the Ballantrae situation. He said he
explained to Mr. Proegler that from the description, it was a localized single-residence that had
become backed up in the basement. He said staff had seen this problem in other developments.
He said it could be caused from localized blocking in the lateral from when the sewer lines were
initially tapped. Mr. Stanford said construction debris causes this. He said usually, with a little
maintenance and flushing, staff can alleviate the problem. He did not think this would be
classified with any means being a system's capacity problem. Mr. Stanford said with this new
development, no further problems are anticipated in Ballantrae to the west as this sanitary will all
flow east into Kendall Ridge.
Mr. Gerber asked how many sewer backups had been reported to the City in this area.
Mr. Stanford said his investigation discovered three sewer backups.
Mr. Gerber asked when they occurred.
Mr. Stanford replied that they were within the last year.
Mr. Gerber asked if the City, the homeowners, or the builders were responsible to take care of
the situation.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 5, 2006
Page 10
DRgF-~-
Mr. Stanford said the City had done so in the past. He said the City could send a camera into the
line to investigate to see if there is any additional blockages, identifying any further problems in
that line along Bazonscourt Way.
Mr. Gerber said the investigation could identify that the City system was not the culprit and
asked for assurance that the City will check this situation to check to see if it is at fault.
Mr. Stanford agreed that it would be camera investigated for additional blockages in the main
line along Bazonscourt Way.
Ms. Jones asked if the City offered any assistance as far as cleanup or help to the residents
affected.
Mr. Stanford said through his investigation, he did not think there had been any claim made to
the City by this resident and that staff would meet with any affected resident. He said this
particular resident had not contacted the staff. He said he found out about the problem
secondhand through Mr. Proegler. Mr. Stanford said via E-mail he let him know that staff would
be glad to meet with him to see what the City can do.
Mr. Gerber requested that in the next Director's report there be a status report regarding the
camera investigation of the backed up sewers in this area.
Mr. Gunderman agreed.
Ms. Husak promised to provide the Commissioners with a copy of the a-mail sent to Mr.
Proegler by the Engineering Staff.
Mr. Saneholtz asked if one of the conditions addressed the reconstruction and appearance issues
with respect to the existing stubs in Kendall Ridge.
Mr. Zimmerman said it would have been easy to put the two streets in Kendall Ridge together to
make a loop street and run one down to the court instead of going out into the other street.
Mr. Hale said they looked at was the right way for this subdivision to develop, and while the
Kendall Ridge subdivision is very nice, the price points in Ballantrae are at least $100,000,
perhaps $150,000 more. He said the economically prudent and right thing to do for the residents
is to put the higher valued product in there and that they could not do that connecting the streets
through Kendall Ridge.
Mr. Saneholtz azgued that this was a benefit to Kendall Ridge because what would have
otherwise been a through street with additional traffic and additional home sites will no longer
go past their front doors. He said his only concern was that with adequate work, the unsightly
stubs could be eliminated in the neighborhood and benefit Kendall Ridge as much as lead to its
detriment. Mr. Saneholtz said he thought it was a very attractive plan. He said he agreed with
the applicant that the lots are more conducive to lazger homes and the way it is laid out.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 5, 2006
Page 11
DRAFT
Mr. Gerber recalled that this had been previously discussed and the main concern was the traffic
onto Ballantrae. He said the residents did not expect this. He said the concern had been with the
residents.
Mr. Gerber asked if the Kendall Ridge stubs were going to be eliminated.
Ms. Wanner said that was something that the City could agree to since the roads were owned by
the City.
Ms. Boring asked that a condition be made that developer be responsible for the restoration of
the area of the stubs.
Mr. Hale agreed.
Ms. Boring said that the proposed text was not clear that this homeowners association would be
part of the original Ballantrae subdivision. She requested Condition 9: That the homeowners
association will be an extension of the current homeowners association of Ballantrae.
Ms. Boring clarified that letters were sent to every Baronscourt Way resident explaining that
they did meet and the traffic calming was not wanted. Ms. Boring thanked Ms. Husak for going
to that detail which will provide a record for the future.
Ms. Boring said she was somewhat unsettled about the last time because she was left with a
distinct feeling that the Proeglers had not been contacted.
Mr. Hale said the Proeglers had been contacted. He presented a letter sent to them by the
developer on February 15~'. He said they told the Proeglers that they felt they had an
understanding with them, although they had not completed their landscaping plan and that the
applicants would make their good faith effort to get a letter from them that they would settle this
issue. Mr. Hale said another lot owner present, who owned the lot to the north of the road, had
agreed about compensation because of their landscaping, etc. He presented a letter dated June
20, 2005 from him to the applicants acknowledging that they had an agreement. Mr. Hale said
he did not feel the meeting was misrepresented -there was an administrative error in the City
and the wrong property owners were notified.
Ms. Boring said she was lead to believe that the Proeglers had signed off on what was proposed
that night.
Mr. Hale said they had an oral agreement with them that they would landscape, subject to them
completing their landscaping which has been completed. He said the work is complete and the
applicant has agreed to do the landscaping work requested.
Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Group, Inc., apologized if he mixed up the two property owners
because he had the agreement from the Mehtas next door, but not a written agreement from the
Proeglers. However, he said he thought there was an oral understanding that they would do
whatever landscaping the Proeglers wanted in their front yard.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 5, 2006
Page 12
DRAFT
Ms. Reiss noted that a letter in the Commission packet included a very specific dollar amount for
the landscaping.
Mr. Proegler said that was a cost estimate for the landscaping plan which he had submitted to the
applicant.
Ms. Husak said an agreement from the Mehta family had also been included in the Commission
packet.
Mr. Hale said they would not go to City Council until the agreement is completed.
Mr. Saneholtz made the motion to approve this rezoning (Preliminary Development Plan)
because this proposal extends Ballantrae, a successful residential development, will provide
parkland, which will facilitate a consolidated open space plan that includes the future Kendall
Ridge Park and is consistent with the recommendations of the Community Plan, with nine
conditions:
1) That all landscaping agreements be finalized and signed by both parties prior to scheduling
this rezoning at City Council;
2) That the plans be revised to show the northern bikepath terminating at the eastern property
line and that the applicant submit a letter committing to install the southern bikepath
connection through City property (Ballantrae Park);
3) That the applicant obtain an easement for the construction and maintenance of the bikepath
within Ballantrae Park or arrange for the City to accept them as their responsibility;
4) That this site comply with the current City of Dublin's Stormwater Regulations, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer;
5) That the applicant consult with the City Forester prior to the final development plan submittal
to verify the preferred street tree species along with installation dates and scheduling;
6) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right of way for Street "A" and
the removal of Lot 322 be approved by Planning Commission and City Council prior to filing
for building permits;
7) That all text and plan revisions be completed prior to scheduling this rezoning at City
Council;
8) That the applicant work with the City to restore the two existing stub streets in Kendall Ridge
to pre-development conditions (lawn) at the expense of the developer, subject to staff
approval; and
9) That the text be revised to state that the homeowners association is an extension of the
existing Ballantrae Homeowners Association.
Charles Driscoll agreed to the above conditions.
Mr. Gerber seconded the motion.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Messineo, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; Ms. Reiss,
yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; and Mr. Saneholtz, yes. (Approved 6-0.)
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
~~ I - _ _ _ - --__ -
- ~i ~ ~ ~__ ~_ , _ ~ _ - _ __ -__ =_ - - __ - _- -- - _= - -=
1 'a S`EE NOTE .1'- - -
- _ _~r.e _ - -_ ___ - - __ - -_
~ __ -- _-~~ ~_ sl' _ __ _._ ._ -a - __ _ ~ ~-
x- }. _ ~ -. __- - - _~
_ _
OPEN SPACEI ~' ..
' I -
ARONSCOURi / ., ~ RESERVE'A' ~ \ -
/- 358 AC EXISTBaG
, ~ PARK - ~.-
SEE SH dOFa--~ - - \
FOR RES V "A" DETAIL ~ ~ ' -" --- G.
,« ;I FEN. _ _ ~ .
\ .~ - _ ._._. PA411 ~ ~ _ f
~_ A
1 '
T-TNBZ ~ M . '
~' N ~ ' RESER - - - - - -. _
a I 23 ~/_ ~ MFJ G N DR.
.. IaNez ~ ~ ^
• -- :_ i
- _ .. _ .. * '°'-- as ' w J ~' u ~ -- ' .-. ' ~ r, - O
1 a o ~
!~ ~J
' a 6 26 ' 20 ' 3 ~ r - ' f
, a: 27 ; I 19 ~ a ~ m y , -
>•• ~ SEE NOTE'G a Au E
-~~ ~ v- •. .___.
+ ~ Y ~:
- `m
:-
1 w 1e ~ a N ~ - r
SEE NO~E'G A ..: ~ ~ _ ~ { r
'' I ~ - za - 1 T ~ a :h ~ L-z
I - ~ Y` I
1 '~ ' 1 18 ~ mr z = l ^
I A ~" I n, ~~ ~~ - -_
V \ Y .
-i r _ --
- F ' ~ I ~ ) O ~ - __ _ - - _
D I ~- nc ~ 14 I a - t-I - _ ~-
f/~/~/ ~ _ _ _ _
u, - 4 4 13 a ~ - ~~ I _) ~~
1 ~ * « r ~ ~~ . C LEY D2 _ _ L.~
~ RESERVE'C' - -
.w ~ */_ 0.01 AC -
W I 1 v 1 NBZ 3. Ia NBt ~ IL.•r.~-~
' ,
g 8' PATH ~J
SEE SHE 4 a -}-i - - - _ _ -
FOR BU R~ TAIL V11- ~~ ~ I Nano- /
~~--- ~-
~ ~ .. .\ , o ~ ® a
~~ ~_, ° ° a OS-1572
,f o - The Glade at Bailantrae
_ ~
LAN DSt~APE AGREEM EN ~ LETTER
December 28, Z{}O5
,MT. and Mrs. Kurt 1?roegler
_, s: , .
5$fx~ ~aronscotirt Way
~~ {?~ 43036
z
-- Ivir and Mrs. Proegler
Dear
- .
"~ - _ti ~ ~ As ~ we' disc~ts'sed, we are willing to ..compensate you X5,818.55 to provide screening from
headlight trespass caused by the new road .into the Glade at Ballantrae. We will pay. you
- $2,9U9~8 by Ianuary IQ, 2406,
~ and the balance ten days -after final zoning approval for the
Glade at~Ballantrae. Any late pay
. ments will bear interest at an 8% annual rate.
-.I~f this meets Stith your approval, please sign and return one copy ~f this letter to me. ~ Please call
~. ,
me_ifyouhave=any questions.
~.~:
Sincerely,
Chazies .P..Dr~coll ~ -
Presidenfi ..
Agreed and Accepted _
.„.
. ~ I
~ r
r~-z~~~
DaxE
os-~S~Z
The Glade at Ballantrae
LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT LETTER
.tune 02, 2005
Charles P. Driscoll
President
Edwards Land Company
495 South High Street
Suite 150
Columbus, OH 43215-7619
Dear Mr. Driscoll:
Thank you for your letter dated May 25th, 2005 regarding proposed road
adjacent to our lot, No 321, Baronscourt Way.
V'Je are pleased to confirm our acceptence of your offer and in token thereof are
mailing to you under cover of this letter the original of your offer letter dated 25th
May, 2005 with our agreement and acceptence endorsed thereon.
Whilst we appreciate your undertaking to construct an additional driveway out to
the new road, a preliminary study of the Departmental Administration Order
regarding Development Code, Section 153.210 (A), indicates that our request
would not violate any of the code requirements. The procedure prescribed
therein would however require to be complied to obtain the formal approval of
the Dublin City authorities, which we trust you, as the developer, would process
at the appropriate time. We shall however, provide you with all the co-operation
and information regarding the configuration of the proposed modification.
Sincerely:
Sanjay 8~ Ranju Mehta
5884 Baronscourt Way
Dublin, Oh 43016
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
TR~,,=FlC CALMING LE i-TER
December 19, 2005
Dear Resident:
Cl'fY OF DUBLIN_
laid Use aad
~ ear ~.i~g The City of Dublin and the Edwards Land Company held a public meeting on
5800 Shier-Rings Road December 14, 2005 for 25 residents along BaronsCOUrt Way. The purpose of
"•-`"n, Ohio 43016-1236
this meeting was to discuss the need for traffic calming on Baronscourt Way and
::614-4101600 review possible traffic calming devices should the residents feel that traffic
a14-41o-a~4~ calming is warranted. Speeding issues along this road were first discussed
We65ite:wr+w.duhkn.oh_us during the Concept Plan hearing for the Glade at Ballantrae.
This letter is intended to inform you of the outcome of the meeting. The residents
in attendance were unanimously opposed to the implementation of any traffic
calming device on Baronscourt Way. The residents believed that the issue with
speeding was temporary, and felt that targeted, increased enforcement by Dublin
Police would encourage speed limit compliance. Staff has contacted the Police
Chief and relayed this information.
The results of the meeting with the residents will be presented to the Planning
and Zoning Commission on Thursday, January 5, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall
as part of the Glade at Ballantrae rezoning application (Case #05-157Z). Staff
encourages all residents to attend this meeting for an opportunity to be part of
the public process.
Please feel free to contact me at 614-410-4675 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Claudia D. Husak
Planner
CC: Case File 05-1572
Jeannie Willis, Assistant City Engineer, Transportation
Dan Phillabaum, Senior Planner
Aaron Stanford, Civil Engineer
Charles Driscoll, President, The Edwards Land Company
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
SIGN-IN SHEET
Baronscourt Way Traffic Calming
12-14-OS 7:00 P.M.
Service Center
~"~~
~ _ n ~ ~ -:
~~ ~l" ~ ~/' ~(,~ ~(~ ~ 5'~~'~ ~~r~;.~S «~, r; (,tit^~-, 4~ 73
/ ~~ ~
~Q%-D / ~/~f~ /C'~' ~ J~~f'~ 7 ~(JQrOl1 SC/oUl ~ G~1~ c~ ~ ~~
U l/' G~~~
~C J
.l
- OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
CITY OE DUBLW_
Land Use gad
Long Range Plaaaisg
s!!m,Sh"rer-Riggs Road
4 Ohio 4301b-1236
:614-410-4600
Fax: 61410-4741
Weh Site: rYww-dubGa.oh-us
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
NOVEMBER 10, 2005
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
2. Rezoning OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae
Location: 15.75 acres located between the Ballantrae, Section 3 and Kendall Ridge,
Section 2 subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park.
Existing Zoning: R, Rural District.
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development
District, under the provisions of Section 153.053.
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development consisting of 28 units and 3.58
acres of open space.
Applicant: The Edwards Land Company, c/o Stephen Hadden, 495 S. High Street, Suite
150, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Claudia Husak, Planner.
Contact Information: (614) 410-4675/Email: chusak@dublin.oh.us.
MOTION: To table this rezoning application to allow the applicant to address traffic calming
with the adjacent property owners and all relevant contracts and agreements with surrounding
property owners regarding any screening plans for headlight trespass.
*Ben W. Hale, Smith and Hale, and Charlie Driscoll, Edwazds Land Company, agreed to the
tabling.
VOTE: 5 - 1.
RESULT: This rezoning application was tabled.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
Anne Wanner, Senior Planner
Land Use and Long Range Planning
Page 1 of 1
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Dublin Planning and Zonis., commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 5 of 23
Mr. Gerlser moved
beca a the pr
the reliminar
C de, with six
That the g
prior to the
2) That a fo
and tha rt
3) That ee
4) Tha site si
S) t any
s eduling
6) at the a
for approval of 's Revised Final Plat for
p ent, to reflect e change fro fee simple t
lat coordinate with the appr ed final devel F
lopment plan• and complies 'th the Final la1
ions:
warranty eds for parkl d reserves be ubmi
ling oft final plat;
ced and funde Homeowner's Association
be responsib for maintains gall the open
in lieu of o en space be p ' prior to reco
ap
along with i
hearing wi
consult wii
ion dates ~r
t in complianc v
i in the Staff ep<
City Council; d
~ 26.374-acre esidential
condomini ownership,
Zent plan an the intent of
reauireme s listed in the
to tl~e City of
required and ted on the fin plat,
ice reserves;
of final pl ;
the curre Stormwater gulations;
be mad to the final lat prior to
the City For ster to verify t~4e preferred s~`eet tree
Mr. Zimme seconded t motion and vote was as f lows: Ms. R iss, yes; Ms. B rind
yes; Ms. Jo s, yes; Mr. M sineo, yes; Mr Zimmerman, s; Mr. Gerber yes. (Approve 6-0.)
2. Rezoning OS-1572 -The Glade at Ballantrae
Mr. Gerber swore in all those who intended to testify.
Ms. Wanner presented slides and the staff report for this Preliminary Development Plan. She
stated that the case was heard in July 2005 as a Concept Plan, and the applicant had addressed
the conditions of the approved Concept Plan. Ms. Wanner said she would also address the items
mentioned at the meeting which were not necessarily conditions.
Ms. Wanner indicated that Lot 23 had been relocated to create more of a symmetrical,
consolidated parkland space. She stated that landscape buffers have been added along the
parkland as well. She also stated that the existing stubs from Kendall Ridge at Meaghan Drive
and Kendall Ridge Boulevard would not be platted as new lots, but that they may be acquired by
the applicant in the future.
Ms. Wanner stated that the access point has not been moved due to the existing homes and the
homes under construction that have been permitted. She indicated that staff has added a
condition so that the developer can coordinate some landscape treatment for the owner of Lot
340 to provide the appropriate landscape screening.
Ms. Wanner said that the applicant has added bumpouts to calm traffic on Baronscourt Way and
the intersection.
C u-
Ms. Wanner said staff is recommending approval of this rezoning request with the nine
conditions and three bases, as listed in the Staff Report.
Dublin Planning and Zonin commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 6 of 23
Mr. Messineo asked if there was an ordinance prohibiting vehicles from pazking along the curb
within a certain distance of an intersection.
Ms. Wanner said that usually there is a "No Parking" sign posted.
Mr. Gerber asked if the bumpouts were concrete.
Ms. Wanner replied that the lower portion of them was usually concrete. She indicated they are
similaz to the bumpouts seen around traffic circles, with a tier of curbing.
Mr. Gerber recalled that when this application had come to the Commission as a Concept Plan,
the Commissioners discussed possible traffic calming on Bazonscourt Way and asked if any of
their comments at that meeting had been taken into consideration.
Ms. Wanner said when staff discussed these two cul-de-sacs it was found that the design of
Courts B and C do not meet the necessary criteria for the requirements of traffic calming due to
the length, the number of homes they served, and the fact that they are cul-de-sacs.
Mr. Gerber was concerned about the Proegler property and wanted to be sure that a condition
was added to prohibit headlight glare.
Mr. Zimmerman asked if the entry could be moved further south.
Ms. Wanner indicated that the applicant contended the entry could not be moved.
Ms. Jones added that was one of the chief issues the Commission discussed at the Concept Plan
and wondered if another option could be explored.
Ms. Boring asked what was the desirable maximum length of a cul-de-sac. She asked if this
street was longer because of safety issues.
Ms. Wanner replied the cul-de-sac length conforms to City standazds.
Ms. Boring suggested that it looked like too many lots exiting on one street. She suggested
utilizing the stubs.
Mr. Gerber asked if these were good, accepted traffic planning principles, and whether these
devices had been used in Dublin.
Aaron Stanford stated that an example of a similar bumpout arrangement is at Quin Abbey
Court, located north of Brand Road and west of Avery-Muirfield Drive. He said there were
others in Dublin.
Ben Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, explained that this piece of property currently belongs to the City
of Dublin. He added that there had been discussion about what these lots should be; an extension
of Kendall Ridge, or an extension of Ballantrae, adding that the price points in both
developments aze substantially different. The decision was made that the best thing to do with
Dublin Planning and ZoninL commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 7 of 23
the site was to join it with Ballantrae. The lot widths are much deeper than the other lots in
Ballantrae. Mr. Hale said that the same Ballantrae builders will be building in this subdivision.
Mr. Hale indicated that the property owner to the north of the entry point may want a side loaded
garage, which would require access onto the street. He said he was cautious about the median
discussed in the staff report.
Charlie Driscoll, The Edwards Companies, said they discussed moving that driveway. He said
they concluded that is already in the best place for Mr. Proegler, because it came out opposite his
driveway. He said if it were located elsewhere, it would be in front of the house. He stated there
was only one lot to adjust, and there was not room to move the driveway. He indicated that they
have agreed to landscape the property any way Mr. Proegler wanted to minimize the effect.
Ms. Reiss asked how the applicant was mitigating the headlight trespass for the property north of
the Proegler property. She asked if they would landscape that property.
Mr. Driscoll said they were willing to do landscaping.
Joe Bruggeman, 6105 Tuswell Drive, stated that he lived in Kendall Ridge on Tuswell Drive.
He said he had spoken with staff about connecting this project through their subdivision. He said
residents got comfortable with the Concept Plan because of the price points, and the lack of
connection to Kendall Ridge. He stated that he was concerned about a traffic volume increase if
connections were made through Kendall Ridge.
Mr. Bruggeman said buffers created with Kendall Ridge are much better than in the Concept
Plan. He said Kendal Ridge residents need to be notified if the Commission is going to consider
an access point to their subdivision.
Mr. Zimmerman asked Ms. Wanner if she had talked with Mr. Proegler about the landscaping.
Ms. Wanner said staff and the applicant had spoken with him. She said she understood that Mr.
Proegler is willing to work with them on the landscape buffer design.
Mr. Gerber asked if there was anything in writing.
Mr. Driscoll said he had written Mr. Proegler a letter stating that he would plant whatever
landscaping was necessary to screen the property.
Mr. Hale said that they consent to the conditions listed below.
Mr. Gerber was concerned that the landscaping issue had not been resolved.
Mr. Hale agreed to fmalize landscaping plans with Mr. Proegler.
Ms. Boring asked if other property owners present at the Concept Plan hearing had contacted the
staff and if they were notified about this hearing.
Dublin Planning and Zonir. commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 8 of 23
Ms. Wanner said surrounding property owners had been notified of this hearing, and to her
knowledge, none had contacted staff.
Ms. Boring was concerned about incorporating traffic calming devices on Bazonscourt Way.
She said she was hoping for a more creative, neighborhood-enhancing type of traffic calming
device, and perhaps more than one along that area.
Ms. Wanner explained that staff reviewed this application with the traffic engineer who wrote
the standazds for traffic calming. She said it was the conclusion of the Engineering department
that the speed and the number of houses on this roadway did not require traffic calming at this
time.
Mr. Gerber added that he was Chairman of the Community Services Advisory Commission when
that policy was presented to City Council and there was a lot of discussion. He said Dana
McDaniel and he gave a presentation to Council saying that that the smartest thing for the City to
do was be proactive and take care of these problems before they become bigger problems.
Ms. Boring said she did not believe that all the traffic calming criteria will be met, because of the
current traffic numbers. She hoped that traffic calming devices could be employed first, if
needed.
Mr. Gerber asked why the traffic calming occurred in front of the attractive Proegler property.
Ms. Wanner stated that it was in response to some of the traffic at this intersection, which the
traffic engineer believed would be an issue.
Ms. Reiss said she felt this bumpout not only slowed down the people turning left and right out
of cul-de-sacs A and B, but it slowed traffic on Bazonscourt Way. She said she was concerned
about placing bumpouts along the entire street and wanted to make sure all residents were
notified of the changes.
Mr. Zimmerman asked if this was a common mode of traffic calming.
Ms. Wanner said this is one mode of traffic calming which mentally acts as though there were a
parked car present which requires caution and a slower speed. She indicated that staff looked at
a traffic circle, but that the roadway was too small.
Mr. Messineo asked what happened if one of the bumpouts was hit.
Mr. Hale said it was a mountable curb and instead the tire would go up on the curb.
Mr. Bird recalled from the previous hearing the gentleman that lived on the curve and said he
was concerned about existing traffic speeding up and going around that curve. He said he was
aware of Dublin streets, such as Monterey Drive, with speed bumps. However, he said this is a
solution the traffic engineers suggested to slow the traffic down mid-point before they get to the
Dublin Planning and Zonii_~ commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 9 of 23
curb. He said as he understood their solution, given the amount of traffic and the current
situation, and even with the projected traffic, it is not warranted for traffic calming devices.
Mr. Bird said perhaps the conclusion on this is to move forward with the zoning, but before the
Final Development Plan have a full report from Engineering that satisfies the concerns and
answers the questions of the Commission. He said it is not just be for this case, but future cases.
Mr. Gerber asked what this land was initially intended for, and how was it to be developed.
Ms. Wanner said the Future Land Use map indicated a residential land use.
Ms. Jones asked how often the situation occurs where a street is proposed through a platted
residential lot. She was concerned that this could set a precedent.
Mr. Gerber explained it was not common and it had happened previously.
Ms. Jones said she understood they wanted to build homes off of Ballantrae because it was a
very successful subdivision. She stated her personal struggle is with putting a street in front of
someone's house when they thought they were going to have a lot there.
Ms. Boring gave a brief history about the property. She stated that it was intentionally sought
after in order to make the Ballantrae project work.
Mr. Hale added that the property was acquired to provide a front door for the Ballantrae
development. He stated that the property was developed as parkland to improve the character of
the area. He said the City contributed $8M or more, including $3M on the Woerner-Temple
pool. He stated that the project was a partnership between the City and the developer to try to
really change what was happening in the area.
Mr. Gerber said he respects the Kendall Ridge residents' concern. He said the layout seemed to
satisfy their concerns as related to additional traffic and made sense.
Mr. Gerber noted his concerns were with the traffic calming effort on Baronscourt Way and the
effort made to contact adjacent property owners about the headlight trespass.
Mr. Gerber asked Mr. Driscoll if he had called the adjacent property owner and suggested that he
work a little more closely with the landowner.
Mr. Driscoll said he had called and thought they had everything worked out. He agreed to obtain
a letter from the homeowner to this effect.
Ms. Reiss asked where the water and sewer were coming from for this area.
Aaron Stanford replied that a water line exists along Baronscourt Way, and a sewer stub exists at
the end of Kendall Ridge Boulevard. He stated that another sewer stub is located to the north.
Discussion continued about the application of easements for the utilities.
Dublin Planning and Zonit. .:ommission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 10 of 23
Ms. Boring said she did not like the bumpouts at the curb. She said she understood the applicant
had worked with the engineering staff, and that was her biggest disappointment. She said she
had been listening to her fellow Commissioners and the property owners when they came in the
last time, and empathized with them. She wanted to work out a situation with this developer that
would be the best thing for the area.
Mr. Zimmerman stated he would like to table the application. He wanted Mr. Proegler involved
as well as the property owner to the north regarding the bumpouts. He felt the traffic calming
plan may affect the Proegler driveway when backing out. He reiterated that the adjacent
property owners should be contacted.
Mr. Gerber restated his concerns that the proposed traffic calming solutions were not creative
enough and more options needed to be considered, and that Mr. Proegler was not present.
Ms. Reiss said she agreed with Mr. Gerber, but felt staff needed to work with the neighborhood
on the traffic calming.
Ms. Boring said she would like to incorporate that idea, but not to hold up the applicant. She felt
the adjacent residents needed to be involved, but that should not holdup the development.
Mr. Gerber asked if a 90-day tabling was needed. He agreed that the case should not be delayed.
Ms. Reiss agreed, but suggested that due to holidays it would not be good timing for meetings.
Ms. Boring asked Ms. Readler if the traffic calming could be listed as a condition.
Ms. Readler said a condition regarding traffic calming and buffering for the adjoining
landowners could be made for the Final Development Plan stage.
Mr. Gerber explained his preference was to consider these elements now at the rezoning stage.
Ms. Boring said because it was so difficult to get everyone's consensus on the traffic calming,
she was not sure it was appropriate to hold up the rezoning for that.
Mr. Gerber said he did not want to wait until the Final Development Plan to determine the traffic
calming measures. He also wanted assurance that the applicant has worked with the adjoining
property owners to find acceptable solutions to the light trespass and traffic calming.
Ms. Jones agreed. She said she would be more comfortable if there was communication from the
neighbors that they are satisfied.
Mr. Zimmerman said, and Ms. Jones agreed, that if a resident could not attend, a letter could be
sent instead.
Dublin Planning and Zonis. commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 11 of 23
Ms. Boring responded that it was prudent to make sure meeting notification is sent to all
residents on the street and to call if there are questions or comments. She said a great job was
done by removing the lot and creating a more open vista into the parkland.
Mr. Zimmerman said his biggest concerns are the entranceway and the lighting that would affect
the Proegler property and the bump-outs. He said the layout of the development is fine.
Discussion continued about the different types of traffic calming devices.
Ms. Wanner stated that the bumpout design had the availability to add landscaping.
Mr. Zimmerman asked if it had been done at any Dublin intersection.
Ms. Wanner replied not in Dublin, but staff had seen pictures of them, and it was something that
everyone thought was acceptable.
Mr. Messineo asked Ms. Wanner if she had said they could add landscaping.
Ms. Wanner said yes, small crescent-shaped islands can be added so it becomes almost an entry
feature to the subdivision.
Mr. Messineo was concerned about the sight triangles.
Ms. Wanner explained they would not block the vision, and there were other street trees planted
along there which would also be out of the line of the sight triangles. She said landscape
materials would be low-growing that added visual interest.
Discussion followed about the design of the bumpout schematic.
Mr. Hale said if there are other alternatives that make sense, they can bring them to the
Commission. He stated that Mr. Driscoll would create a landscape drawing for Mr. Proegler
instead of asking him to do the drawing.
Mr. Gerber asked if the Commissioners had copies of the agreements with Mr. Proegler
regarding landscaping.
Ms. Wanner said these agreements were not available at the time of packet distribution.
Mr. Zimmerman asked if the agreements also included the resident to the north.
Mr. Driscoll stated they said they would help that property owner obtain approval for the
driveway fronting onto the proposed entry street.
Ms. Reiss asked if the City had problems with that, and Ms. Wanner responded it did not.
Mr. Hale stated his concerns with the timing and delays.
Dublin Planning and Zoni._ commission
Minutes -November 10, 2005
Page 12 of 23
Ms. Reiss asked if the property to the south of the new street near Baronscourt Way was
currently vacant.
Mr. Driscoll said it was vacant.
Ms. Reiss noted that they would not have to obtain an agreement with that property owner.
Mr. Driscoll said he is the property owner.
Mr. Gerber said he was agreeing with Mr. Zimmerman that they need a tabling to look at the
issues discussed and return to the Commission quickly. He felt this was part of what they talked
about at the Concept Plan, and he was frustrated with it, hoping to see a little more than this.
Mr. Hale said they sat down and reviewed all the options and thought this was best.
Ms. Boring asked about the homeowner's association, and whether they will be blended into
Ballantrae, or have their own.
Mr. Driscoll said he thought it would be part of Ballantrae's homeowner's association.
Ms. Boring asked that it be reflected in the proposed text that this development will be merged
into Ballantrae's homeowner's association.
Mr. Zimmerman moved that the Commission table this rezoning application to allow the
applicant to address traffic calming with the adjacent property owners and all relevant contracts
and agreements with surrounding property owners regarding any screening plans for headlight
trespass.
Ms. Jones seconded the motion.
Mr. Hale agreed to the tabling.
The vote was as follows: Mr. Messineo, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes;
Ms. Jones, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Tabled 5-1.)
Mr. Gerber called for afive-minute recess.
3. Co ihonal Use -
M irfield Drive
154CU - e Shoppes o Athenry - ry Kelley's atio - 7142
Mr. underman sai he underst~
w contacted h~ today, that
n ighborhood, the applican~
ere is a chanc that they can e
~o from talking 'th the applic t and an ad tional attorn
ere is a pot tial that som of the repre entation by e
would prefer t have this cas tabled. He sa he was told at
;otiate the iss es.
-.
CPIY OE D[18LiN_
la~i tlu Md
twy Rye tbriia9
1100 Sli~r~s toed
DPI`' Okio 43011-1236
r4 A4-410-4600
Fmc ei4~10-4147
Y~ Sn~ rnn_du6$aalus
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
JULY 21, 2005
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
3. Concept Plan 04-153CP -The Glade at Ballantrae
Location: IS_788 acres located between the Ballantrae Section 3 and Kendall Ridge
Section 2 subdivisions, north of the Woerner-Temple Community Park.
Existing Zoning: R, Rural District
Request: Review and feedback of a conceptual residential development plan under the
provisions of Code Section 1 S3.OS3(C).
Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development consisting of 29 units and 3.58
acres of open space.
Applicant: The City of Dublin, c/o Jane S. Brautigam, City Manager, 5200 Emerald
Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017 and The Edwards Land Company, c/o Charles P. Driscoll,
President, 49S S_ High Street, Suite ISO, Columbus, Ohio 43215_
Staff Contact: Dan Phillabaum, Senior Planner.
Contact Information: (614)410-4662/Email: dphillabaum@dublin_oh.us.
MOTION: To approve this Concept Plan for asingle-family residential development because
it matches the Community Plan recommendations for land use and density, and the development
is consistent and compatible with adjacent land uses, with three conditions.
Conditions:
I) That the applicant coordinate the locations of both eight-foot bike paths with the
Director of Parks and Open Space;
2) That landscape buffers be included along lots adjacent to open space, subject to staff
approval; and
3) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right of way for Street
"A" and the removal of Lot 322 be submitted prior to filing for building permits.
• Ben Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, agreed to the above conditions.
1 of 2
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Planning and Zoning Commission
Record of Action - Juiy 21, 2005
Concept Plan 04-153CP (Continued)
VOTE: 7-0
RESULT: This Concept Plan will be forwarded to City Council with a positive
recommendation.
STAFF CER ICATIO
c
Dan Phillabaum
Senior Planner
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Page 2 of 2
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
N[inutes -July 21, 2005
Page 9
3) That the final street nam or the development be appr ed by the Division of Engi ring;
4) That the driveways ac _ sing the private street be i eased from 12 to 16 feet;
5) That additional scr Wing be added adjacent to b ~ dings 1 and 5, subject to st approval, to
mitigate encroa ents into the setback area;
6) That the Lr urvey and landscape plan a revised to incorporate t comments in this
report, su ~ t to staff approval;
7) That t site stormwater manage rat is in compliance wi the current Stormwater
Re ations, and the Tartan West. aster Stormwater Manage rat Plan to the satisfaction o
City Engineer;
8) hat the design of alt priva drives, parking areas, and 've approaches meet or exc the
requirements and stand of the Engineering Divisio ,
9) That the site must mply with the Division o ngineering Administrativ olicy for
Intersection Visibi - y Triangles at all proposed cess points;
10) That all privat streets shall be a minim of 24 feet, back-of--curb t ack-of--curb, as
described in a Development Standards f this Subarea;
11) That ad ate maneuvering area is vided for fire and waste auling vehicles to the
satisfa on of the Washington Twp. ire Department and the City ngineer;
12)Tha e access to Subarea K le to an adequate drive aisle the satisfaction of the Cit}i
1 at the dedication to the- ~ y of public open space by neral warranty deed be do prior
to final occupancy;
14) That the entry sign sign meet the approved fi development plan for the artan West
comprehensive en sign package; and
IS)That the solo be muted, earth-toned, a coordinate with the arc tecture and that
specificatio and samples be submitted, ject to staff approval_
Mr. Zi an seconded the motion d the vote was as follows_ s. Reiss, yes; Ms_ Boring,
yes; M essineo, yes; Ms. Jones, s; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; r_ Gerber, yes_ (Approved
6-0. Mr. Saneholtz had previou recused himself ]
3. Concept Plan 04-153CP -The Glade at Ballantrae
This case was on the Consent Agenda because Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Company, agreed
in writing to the three conditions listed in the staff report prior to the meeting.
Mr_ Gerber said this is a request for review of a Concept Plan fora 29-lot, single-family
residential development with 3.58 acres of open space. The Concept Plan is the first step in the
Planned Distract approval process, and the next step is rezoning_
Mr. Phillabaum explained this was a request for feedback on a Concept Plan fora 15.78 acre
residential development consisting of 29 single family lots_ The site is located in the southwest
portion of the City of Dublin, between the existing Kendall Ridge and Ballantrae Subdivisions,
and north of the Woemer-Temple Community Park (Ballantrae Park). The site is flat and
possesses no significant natural features, and is part of a larger 36.75 acre tract purchased by the
City in 2001, with the lower portion parallel to Woemer-Temple Road developed as the
Woemer-Temple Community Park_ This remaining acreage was projected as future residential
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Lublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -July 2i, 2005
Page i 0
development within the Community Plan_ This is the first development application for the site_
The site is zoned R, Rural and adjacent properties to the east and west are zoned PLR, Planned
Low-Density Residential District_ The Dublin School Bus Complex to the north is zoned LI,
Limited Industrial District_
Mr. Phillabaum explained that the City of Dublin and Edwards Land Company are co-applicants
for this Concept Plan_ He said staff has held meetings with the adjacent residents of the
Ballantrae, Kendall Ridge and Dan-Sherri neighborhoods to discuss this proposal and identify
the residents' concerns_ With the input obtained from these meetings, staff has worked with the
developer to address these concerns and modify the Concept Plan accordingly_ Additionally, a
copy of the Concept Plan was included with the meeting notice mailed to the adjacent residents_
Mr. Phillabaum stated the Concept Plan proposes 29 single-family lots on two cul-du-sacs, at a
density of 1.84 units per acre, which is consistent with the future land use designation of Medium
Density Residential (1-2 units per acre). The lots are accessed via the removal of a platted tot
within Ballantrae, Lot 322, to be replatted as right-of-way_ The cul-de-sacs are open to the
proposed 3_S8 acre open space area to the north, as well as to Woerner-Temple Community Park
to the south, to provide both physical and visual access to these open spaces_
Mr. Phillabaum noted two existing stub streets within Kendall Ridge, east of the site, are not
being extended into the site out of the developer's desire for this development to be an extension
of Ballantrae with the same general development standards_ The City Engineer has determined
that inter-connectivity of these two neighborhoods is not necessary as both areas have adequate
and multiple access points. Were these streets to be connected, the potential for cut-through
traffic in Kendall Ridge, going toward Avery Road, would increase, creating a situation which
may have required future traffic calming_
Mr_ Phillabaum said that due to the site context, surrounding uses and lack of existing natural
features, the site is not considered a prime candidate for conservation design and the applicant
intends to rezone this parcel to a planned district, using the same general development standards
of Ballantrae, Sub area G_ The proposed Concept Plan matches the Community Plan
recommendations for land use and density and the development is consistent and compatible
with adjacent land uses. He said staff recommends approval of this Concept Plan with three
conditions:
1) That the applicant coordinate the locations of both eight-foot bike paths with the Director of
Parks and Open Space;
2) That landscape buffers be included along lots adjacent to open space, subject to staff
approval; and
3) That an amended plat for Ballantrae Section 3 indicating the right-of--way for Street "A" and
the removal of Lot 322 be submitted prior to filing for building permits_
Ben Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, representing the applicant, mentioned that Edwards has been
working with the City for a year planning on how to develop the site_ He said the basic idea that
came out of all those meetings was that there would be one street, and because of the width of
the piece of property, with very deep lots_ Mr_ Hale continued that the lots have been sized so
that houses that are comparable in terms of square footage and value that exist in Ballantrae
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -July 21, 2005
Page I1
would be built there. He said Edwards has held a couple of lots off of the market so that there
can eventually be a street through Ballantrae_ He said they aze exceeding the park requirement_
He said to the north end, there will be a park connecting to the Kendall Ridge Pazk. Mr. Hale
explained that they are proposing a bike path so that the people can get into both of these parks
without having a bike path between lots_
Mr. Gerber invited public comment_
Kurt Proegter, 5867 Baronscourt Way, said they are on Lot 340, opposite the proposed street.
He said was never an indication -zoning, plat, or any materials that a road would be there. He
said when they expressed that to Mr. Driscoll, he explained that the City requires it. Mr.
Proegter said they expressed at the public meeting that they prefer it not to be located there due
to headlight encroachment, safety concerns, view, etc. Mr. Proegter added they would like any
alternatative location to be explored_ However, if the street should be where it is now shown,
they would like to request that the developer mitigate those impacts to their satisfaction as a
condition of approval.
Mr_ Gerber commented that this Concept Plan is non-binding on both sides. It is a chance for it
to be discussed. He said there will be other hearings and other opportunities to raise concerns.
Kevin Reilly, 5923 Baronscourt Way (Lot 344), across from the pocket park, said the Ballantrae
Master Plan, does not include a street at Lot 322, and it seems very unDublin-like that it was not
addressed a year or two ago, as the development was being developed_
Mr. Reilly was concerned about traffic passing the pocket park causing a tragedy. He
recommended stop signs at both the entrance and both sides of the park.
Cathy Boring said Mr. Reilly's comment about the traffic was interesting, because the traffic is
generated from the neighbors. She suggested he ask that their association send a letter asking
that the traffic/speed pattern on this site be observed_ Ms. Boring said there has to be a way
remove the stub and make it look more attractive. She said both stubs need to be turned into
something attractive.
Mr. Phil(abaum replied that there is a median at the stub for Kendall Ridge Boulevard, and there
is ample width that could be platted as a residential lot with the pavement removed. He said the
stub to the north does not have sufficient width to plat as a lot.
Ms_ Boring noted the density matches Ballantrae, but Lot 23 needs to be removed because it does
not fit with the green space and park area.
Mr. Saneholtz was concerned about the headlight glare from Megan Drive_ He said now, instead
of shining into the rear of the house at Lot 23, they are shining into the front windows of the
house on Lot 24_
Ms_ Jones asked what was customary, a stop sign or a three-way stop sign on Baronscourt Way_
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
hublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -July 21, 2005
Page t2
Barb Cox replied that there would be a stop sign installed for the traffic coming westbound on
`Street A' before turning onto Baronscourt Way.
Ms. Jones asked if there would also be stop signs on Baronscourt Way_
Ms_ Cox responded that a stop sign would not typically be put on Baronscourt Way at that
location_
Ms_ Boring inquired why the street is so straight without traffic calming devices_
Ms_ Cox said staff has not gotten to that level of detail, but it could be explored with the
applicant if Ms. Boring wished.
Ms_ Boring indicated traffic calming should be explored, because traffic calming as part of the
plan had previously been discussed.
Ms. Cox stated that from the intersection at `Street A' and `Street B' southward, it is
approximately 700 feet to the center of the cul-du-sac.
Ms. Boring suggested that traffic calming devices like chokers be included with this plan so they
become routine to request as a standard.
Ms. Cox responded that it was something staff could explore.
Mr. Saneholtz said his concerns were what was actually going to happen to the stubs in Kenda(i
Ridge, and that everything possible should be done to make that appear tike it was designed
instead of by accident, ending up with a stub into nothing. He said the Commission would like
the staff and the developer to look into some creative treatment at the new proposed intersection
that could be used for two purposes: 1) to redirect the headlights out of Lot 340; and 2) slow the
traffic on Baronscourt Way_
Ms_ Boring agreed trafc calming needed to be installed in Baronscourt Way since this was an
addition to the development by the same developer. She said it had to be intense, with traffic
calming measures every 300 feet, similar to Tara Hill_
Mr_ Zimmerman asked Mr_ Phillabaum how did `Street A' end up in its location and what
criteria were used. He noted it was not centered.
Mr_ Phillabaum showed an exhibit indicating the level of development within Ballantrae_ He
said based on the degree of build-out, there are limited alternate locations for that street.
Mr_ Gerber asked what was originally planned for this parcel.
Mr_ Phillabaum replied this was designated as Future Residential in 1997, and then the Woerner-
Temple Park was developed.
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Dublin Planning and Zoning ._,ommission
Minutes -July 21, 2005
Page 13
Mr_ Gerber then asked at that time where was the road contemplated.
Mr. Phillabaum stated there was nothing indicated on the Thoroughfare Plan.
Ms. Boring commented that the land was purchased in 2001 to ensure that there would be the
huge park along Woerner-Temple Road. She said nothing was pictured -the idea was just to get
the maximum "pop_"
Ms. Cox said that when the Kendall Ridge subdivision was preliminarily platted, Woerner-
Temple Road still went from Avery Road to Cosgray Road. She said Kendall Ridge Boulevard
was created with the idea and the intent that it would continue west and probably tie in to
Woerner-Temple Road at some direction westward. As Ballantrae was proposed, the idea
changed a little from what was anticipated, and over the years this land ended up being a swath
that didn't get included with either subdivision.
Mr_ Zimmerman asked if there was a way to center the street on Lots 322 and 323 so that it
would be centered between existing homes in Ballantrae.
Mr_ Gerber replied that this is a Concept Plan, and did not need to get into details. He said there
is a problem with that street and other places for it need to be considered along with traffic
calming. He said the invasion of lights onto adjacent property is also a concern.
Mr. Zimmerman stated he would like to see those lots not sold at this time so any adjustments
could be made if necessary_
Mr. Gerber did not know if that could be made a condition.
Carol Proegler, 5867 Baronscourt Way, asked if a different entry at Lots 319 and 320 would be
explored_
Mr_ Zimmerman questioned if the proposed road were to be aligned between Lots 322 and 323,
could any headlight trespass fall between lots 339 and 340 across Baronscourt Way_
Mr. Bird said staff would take a look at the possible entry locations and discuss them with the
developer when it comes back in preliminary form_
Ms_ Reiss brought to staff s attention the need for water and sewer easements_ She asked if they
were needed in Kendall Ridge to service this new area_
Mr_ Gerber said that would be discussed at the preliminary.
Ms_ Reiss said she would like the existing, partial tree row on the southwest corner of the site
preserved_ She said some of them were good-sized_
Mr. Gerber stated that would alt come up in the preliminary.
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -July 21, 2005
Page 14
Mr. Hale said they would work with staff to address most of the concerns and said they would
probably file their preliminary September lst for the October meeting.
Mr_ Gerber moved for approval of Concept Plan 04-153CP because it matches the Community
Plan recommendations for land use and density, and the development is consistent and
compatible with adjacent land uses, with three conditions.
1) That the applicant coordinate the locations of both eight-foot bike paths with the Director of
Parks and Open Space;
2) That landscape buffers be included along lots adjacent to open space, subject to staff
approval; and
3) That an amended plat for Ballantrae, Section 3 indicating the right of way for Street "A" and
the removal of Lot 322 be submitted prior to filing for building permits_
Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Mr.
Saneholtz, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr_ Messineo, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Mr_ Zimmerman, yes; and
Mr_ Gerber, yes. (Approved 7-0.)
4. Final Development P n/Final Plat OS-085FDP/ -Ballantrae, Section 1 Lots 660
t6roug6 667
Mr_ Gerber said this s a Final Development P final Plat for eight lot n Section 10 of
Ballantrae_ The P ing and Zoning Commis on is to determine if the fi 1 layout and details
comply with th approved Preliminary Plat_ A recommendation will g o City Council, and if
approved the ,the plat will be recorded nd the applicant may pro ed to the building permit
process_ _ Gerber swore in those w intended to testify in reg to this case_ /
Jam Coyle, Advance Civil Des- the applicant, agreed wi the following 11 condition .
1 That the applicant work ith Engineering to finaliz a design for the median tat the
intersection of Eitecma oad and Glasin Court, su ~ t to staff approval;
2) That the site must omply with the Division f Engineering Administr ~ e Policy for
Intersection Visib~ ty Triangles at all propos access points;
3) That the appli t install deciduous shru on the west side of the eandering sidewalk
along Eite n Road to improve privac or future homeowners, sub- ct to staff approval;
4} That the sting trees and undergrow be preserved where feasib ;
5) That t Eiterman Road buffer a street trees be installed i imilar fashion to the buff
trey ent along the Villas of llantrae to the east, shout the existing trees not su ~ e,
s ject to staff approval;
6) hat the applicant contin to work with staff to uti ~ e protective measures du - g home
construction to save ad ~tional trees where feasible;
7) That the landscape ns and construction drawl s be revised to show the a sting trees and
tree protection fe mg;
8) That utility pr tder information not be re fired on a per lot basis, as viously required by
condition, b be noted on the plat, and t t the applicant supply suc nformation in the sales
office;
9) That r uired parkland be dedicate in future sections;
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Page 8 Meeting
Hc(d August t3, 2001
Mr_ M h stated that Ms. G gsby will fax tentativ agendas for the h to Council
mein _ He suggested until members re ' w the agendas and f their questions
to . Grigsby the day be the mceting, and will attempt to hav a requested
inf 'on available for meeting_
ere will be a second ing/public hearing t the September 4 C cil meeting_
Ordinance 94-01- n Ordinance Accep rig the Lowest/Best id for the Oatdoor
PoolImproveme Project_
Mayor ICranstub introduced the ordi ce_
Mrs_ Boring ~ fired about the instal lion schedule_
Mr_ Hahn cd that installatio will occur in the Eall 001 months and Sp - g 2002
months in o er to be completed b ore pool opening da rn 2002_
Mr. Ad requested a copy o plan to be provid in the next Council acket
There be a second readin ublic hearing at the gust 27 Council m ng_
Ord' ante 95-01- An Or finance Accepting t Lowest/8est Bid fo the Darree
Fi s Expansion Projec
yor ICranstuber in ced the ordinance_
_ Adamek request copy of the plan to provided in the nex Council packet
ere will be a seco reading/public heari gat the September 4 until meeting
Ordinance 96-0 Aa Ordinance Au orizing the City M ager to Enter into
Agreement wi Washington Towns ip for the Purpose Collecting Fees on ehalf
of the Towns p, and Declaring a mergeucy.
Mr. Adam ntroduced the Ordin ce_
Mr_ Hand stated that this legis lion is provided in f ow-up to discussion the last
Counal ceting. Staff reques hat the legislation approved by emerg y.
Mayor anstuber moved top s the legislation by ergency and dis a with the
publi eating.
Mr_ damek seconded the otioa
V eon the motion: Mr. einer, yes; Mrs. Bo ~ g, yes; Mr. McCas yes; Mayor
tuber, yes; Ms_ rutici-Zuercher, yes; r_ Adamek, yes.
ote on the Ordin Mr. Reiner, yes; M . McCash, yes; Ms. innici-Zuercher, y
h Mayor Kranstuber, ;Mrs. Boring, yes; r. Adamek, yes_
V(Ordiaance 97-0 - An Ordinance V acing 7.902 Acres, ore or [,ess, of Wo er-
empk Road, egianing at Cosgr Road and Eztendi g East to a Point B g
Approzimat y 1830 Feet Wes[ o he Ccnteriine of A ry Road, City o(D lia,
County of anklia, State of O o, and Declaring an mergency_
Mayor ICr stuber introduced ordinance_
Mr_ H ey staled that staff r uests adoption by a ergency.
Mc Ci ochi stated that this dinance is a housek ing measure to d with the platting
that t k place with the Ba antrae subdivision golf course develop ent Much of this
str has been abandon during the construct n phase_ In the ab onmen[ of the right-
o ay, the City has re- atted the area_ F in County has requ ed a formal action i
e< to vacate these p rtions. He noted th there are some priva ownerships going
ough the centerli of the road; those not a part of this pet ~on_ Those areas w ~ch
are included in the etition are owned by a Edwards Comp or ttte City of DubC _
Mayor ICranstube moved to pass the 1 islation by emergen and dispense with e
public hearing.
Mr_ Adamek nded the motion.
Vote the otion: Mr_ Adam yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; ayor ICranstuber, y ; Mr_
McCash, y ; Mrs_ Boring, yes; s. Chiruici-Zuerche yes_
Vote on a Ordinance: Ms_ C rn[tici-Zuercher, yes; r_ Adamek, yes; M .Boring, yes;
Mr. Mc ash, yes; Mayor stuber, yes; Mr_ Rei r, yes_
Ordinance 98-01 - An Ordinance Approving and Authorizing the City Manager and
DtreMor of Fiaance to Execute a Park Development Agreement with P' "---
Development Co_, Waiving Related Competitive Bidding Requiremeo
~5-~ 57Z
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Mtnutes of Dublin City Council Page 9 Mce~g
Hdd August 13, 2001
Dedaring an Etnetgency.
Mayor Kraostubcr introduced the ordinance.
Mc Hansley stated that staff roquests adoption by emergettcy_
Mr. Ciarodu seated that this ordinance will authorize the development of the park along
the worth side of Woemer-Temple Road as it enters into the Baltanttae subdivision. He
noted that two drawings have been provided to Council: a schematic of the entire panic
area and a schematic of some of the walls.
He added that cortstnrction of the park will involve City appropriation in the capital
improvements budget, and the developer has a presentation of the proposed development
plan.
Pete Edwards. Edwards Land Company. stated that Dublin's original objective was to
raise the bar for the quality of development in the southwest azea, in particular along
Avery Road_ [t is more difficult to change a developed area than to start with an
undeveloped area. Because of this, Dublin needed a massive deveMpment with a great
entrance approach The entrance approach takes on added significance because of a tack
of character in the other 642 acres and the undesirable existing uses along Avery and Shier
Rings roads. There was only one possible approach, and that is the park being presented
to Council tonight it is a vital element in helping Dublin reach its objective and should
not be compromised The panic presentation team will answer questions at the conclusion
of lice presentation. Mike Fite of Bird-Houk Associates will outline the overall theme of
the development; the theme ties the development and the patio together. He will be
followed by Keith Myers of Myets-Schmalenberger, who will provide park details.
Michael Fite. Bird-Houk Associates. stated that their vision for Ballantrae is taken from
the Irish iandscape_ Research of Irish landscapes identified four distinct categories, and
those elements are included throughout the Ballantrae development: open space, water,
stone, and ruins. Mr_ Fite accompanied his presentation with a slide presentation with
character images of those elements. Tonight's focus is on the parks. There are i9 parks
throughout the development with over SO acres of parkland, and the 209-acre golf course
provides a substantial contribution of open space. He noted that the traffic circle contains
a unique 2.65-acre park, which is built on the concept of an agrarian landscape -- seasonal
Gelds of color contained by three bisecting walls. A double row of trees around the edge
contains the bikepath, and the central focus of this park is a small ruin and perennial
garden. The traffic circle is located at the end of Woemer Temple Road just past the
entrance park.
Keith Myers. Meets-Schmalenbereer Associates, stated that the entrance panic has the
potential of becoming a world lass park. Creating an Irish landscape theme is a
challenge, as central Ohio landscape is flat. This area has only afoot-foot drop over the
entire eleven acres. They worked hard to create an interesting framework with the Irish
theme. The site is bounded by the Kendall Ridge subdivision on one side, and open space
that is part of the Kendall Ridge plat on another side. The park will include: three to four
acres of lakes with a stone weir creating a waterfall; a tong stone wall arcing around the
park; a reforestation area; and the centerpiece of the pack - a 20-foot hillock with a stone
face "calved away over time, an active play fountain in front and at the end of a winding
path to the top, a stone sculpture replica of "The Dancing Hares," of the Hague. He hopes
[hat this park is something the City is proud of and a tasting contribution to the
community.
Mrs. Boring inquired•how "kid friendly" the sculpture is_
Mr_ Myers stated that the original of this sculpture is at The Hague in the Netherlands, and
many children played around it_
Mrs_ Boring inquired if there were many areas that weren't "kid friendly "
Mc_ Edwards stated that they have talked with the water and stone designers and have
emphasized this need, and as the park is built they wilt continue to communicate with the
City's grounds and facilities department to assure this.
Mts. Boring stated that some of the City's public art is designed to attract children, yet is
labeled "do not touch"
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
NCmates of Dublin City Counal _ . .Page 10 Mceting
Held _ August 13, 2001
Mr. Edwazds stated that this worldclass sculpture is not in the City's budget- The
Edwards Land Company will buy the sculpture and rent it to the City for five years for
$ i/yeaz_ At the end of the five years, Edwards wiN enter into negotiations with the City to
determine if the sculpture will remain in the park If the City does not want the sculpture,
then, or at any time, the satlpture can be removed.
Mr_ Boring inquired what activities are to be permitted at the lakes~
Mr_ Hahn stated that the takes would be stocked- At some time in the Cutwe, the City may
develop a pavilion or shelter house, similar to the one in Coffman Patk, which wuM be
rented by the residents. In addition, to meet the safety standards for children, the lakes
will be constructed with shelf areas along the shorelines~
Mrs_ Boring inquired if seating areas are proposed for the current development.
Mr. Myers responded that benches will be at the top of the hillock near the sculpture and
seating areas will be constructed in the stone at the base of the fountain~
Mr_ Adamek stated that previous discussions indicated a substantial hedge around the crest
of the hill, which will be 20-25 feet high~
Mr. Myers stated that the hillock does slope down- From the top of the fence to the
bottom is twelve feet- There is a bodge and a small fence buried in the hedge~
Ms_ Chinnici-Zuercher inquired about tfte projected completion date~
Mr. Edwards stated that the opening of the Baltantrae development is planned for next
June with the June "Parade of Homes"
Mr_ Reiner inquired about the cost of "The Dancing Hazes," should the City want to
purchase the sculpture~
Mr. Edwards stated that, although the artist's price for that sculpture has now risen to
$400,000.00, his company was able to lock in an earlier purchase price of 5300,000.00.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to pass the legislation by emergency and dispense with the
public hearing~
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion
Mrs- Boring inquired why there is a need for emergency approval of a park development~
She understands that the Parade of Homes occurs in June but does not believe that should
dictate the timeline_ This may not be in the best interest of the citizenry.
Mr_ Ciazochi stated that, originally, a July date was projected for the golf course, but now
the project is being hurried along to meet the Parade of I-Tomes timeline_ Also, the City
does have a partnership with The Edwards Company on this project, and both parties
already have money invested in the project
Mc Edwards explained that the dirt has been balanced on the entire site, and while the
contractor and equipment are on the site, the construction needs to be done~
Vole on the motion- Mr_ Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr_ Reiner, yes; Mr.
McCash, yes; Mrs_ Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr_ Adamek, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance- Mr_ Adamek, yes; Mayor ICranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms_
Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr_ Peterson, yes; Mr_ Reiner, yes; Mrs_ Boring, yes.
IViJV l IVl~J - ll~ l l~V V l lVl~ K
Resol ion 37-01 - A Reso lion Adopting a M orandum of Agre ent Between
the tty of Dublin and T~ othy C_ Hanstey.
Mr Adamek introduced a Resolution_
t ere were no questro or comtnenis_
ore on the Resolutio Mr_ McCash, yes; r_ Reiner, yes; Mr. eterson, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr_ A ek, yes; Mayor Kr tuber, yes; Ms. Ch- ici-Zuercher, yes_
Resolution 38-0 - p Resolution Ad ling a Policy fort Future Developme t of
Post Road, D lia, Ohio.
Mr. Adamek - troduced the Resol on, noting that this solution is coming ck from
the Ad Hoc ommittee for Post ad concerning the a ansion of Coffman k and how
that exp wn would affect the omeowners in this .This policy is the ulmination of
several ee[ings and has the pport of all the com ttee members.
Vote o the Resolution- Mr einer, yes; Mrs_ Bo rig, yes; Mr_ McCas yes; Mr.
Ad ek, yes; Mr_ Peterso ,yes; Ms_ Chinnici-Z ercher, yes; Mayor
OS-1572
The Glade at Baliantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
~~~ rb,h~.iCitY-Couacit pro ~ utKr-As
Ilcld
Ms. ~ responded
Several were p
Irish F vest Event° A
mini in CoBman
Ma Kraastrrba asked
stated sees
Apri12, toot
at is hosting a n
.m to the I~ovalian
- y 4oa-soo nor
and the c~~eclation
the level of oonQt
City frrndc have
IG Confacacc spo
~ ' for this LSt}r f event
a~ ~y "NCnn-
attendces ue for dre
that alwhol will be ed_
on the City ism - for this eveat
geted, tickd saes ill provide a
ip committcc p_ck up the
of the cost, andy
Mayor Kransurtier - Hired about the cap f taxpayer fiords for s evert
Ms_ eaigsby respo ed that 520,000 was getcd, which - es the rxcption and
other related The ~ponsocahit tree is worivng t ds a goal of -
SS0,000 in ape cship dollars for the art
Mis_ Boring that, dther than langstandin3 traditi with the Irish Fcs<i the
Gty has a cY of not sfrving l in City parks S supports this requ which
was on - y submitsed io Co ~ last year- But in of future policy ectioq will
these be expectation o f r - approving such oral ers?
Mr_ ley claribod that current policy remai that there will ben wnspicuous
co tion of alcohol - 'ty parks, which is uistent with the poll of the State, the
Ci of Columbus, and ci6es_
r_ Reimer moved to and the waivers as r uest~~d to allow the ojalcohol in
Cojj»tan Parlr jar Irish Festiva! and IG Canference_
Afi_ Peterson s ed t{re motion.
ote on the o " n: Mri Reiner, yes; _ McCaslr, Yes: Mcs ormg, y':s; Mr_ P q
yes; Ms. ci-Zuaclher, yes; M or Kranstuber, yes; . Adameic,yes_
Ms. asked that Council i eatify a date for boar and commission m
- trainug_
Folio ~ discussioq the - g was scheduled for onday, May 14 :rt 7 _m.
LEGISLATION
TABLED ORDINAN ~ CHEDULED FOR HEARING
Ordiaance 30-01- An rdinancc to Appropriate a 36.748 Acre, More or Less, Ree
Simple Interest (1.85301 Acres, More or Less to be Used for Right-of:-Way and 34.895
Acres, More or Less, to be Used [or Parkiaod) from Anadeto Galli Trtastee,
Located at the Northwest Corner of Avery Road and Woerner-Temple Road, City
of Dublin, County of )~rwklin, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr_ Smith stated that thi Law Department has reached agreement with Mr_ Galli, and
therefore requests that the ordinance be tabled to the April 23rd Council meetitrg_
Mayor Kranstulier moved to table the ordinance to the April 23"' l:,ourt.il meeting.
Mi Adamek seconded the motion~
Vote on the motion- Mr_ Petersoq yes; Mr_ Adar~ek, yes; Mr_ McCasb, Yes: Mrs_
Boring, yes; Ms_ Chinnci-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstubu, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes_
Mrs. Boring requested that another copy of this o.'~dinance be provided n the next paclret
Mr_ Smith stated that sta$wili have a new ordinance for Council to consider which wilt
authorize the City Manager to enter into a contrecz for the purchase of the property- Staff
will be requesting anergcncy action- The fiords ,ire available for the ptuchase, and this
wi11 allow We golf course project to proceed without delay.
I G ECO RE ING-CtRDINAN S
Ordinance 32 1- An Ordinance ending the Annu Appropriations for e
Fiscal Year ding December 31 01.
There were o questions~
V to on - ce: Ms_ ei-Zuercher, pes; _ Adamck, Yes: Mr_ eCash,
Yes; Mr eterson, yes; Mr_ R er, yes; Mrs_ Boeing es.
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Mutates of Dublin City Council Page 7 Mcetmg
Held April 23, 2001
c*~~
2001 S ys at Scioto Suits the September 30 blip Art and Masi estivaL
Mr. R " er seconded the moti
Vote the ~o - Ms. ~ci-Zuu+cher, yes; ayor KrarutnbK, Mr_ Reiner,
yes, c McCash, Yes; Mr Adamek, yes; Mr. P n, yes; Mrs- yes_
LEGISLATION
TABLED ORDINANCES SCHEDULED FOR HEARING
Ordinance 30-01 - An Ordinance to Appropriate a 36.748 Acre, More or Less, Fee
Simple Interest (1.8530 Acres, More or Less to be Used for Right-0f-Way and 34.895
Acres, More or Less, to be Used for Parkland) from Anacleto Galli, Trustee,
Located at the Northwest Cotner of Avery Road and Wcerner-Temple Road, City
of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Adamek moved to withdraw the ordinance.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion
Mr. Smith stated that the City has now negotiated an agreement with Mr. Galli which will
be voted upon iata tonight
Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mc Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes-, Mrs.
Boring, yes; Ms_ Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor ICranstuber, yes; Mr. Rdner, yes_
Ordinance 37-01 - Ordinance Accep ' g the Annczation 5.651+/- Acres fro
Washington Town ip to the Gty of D Ctn.
Mr. Hansley scat that this annexation now been approv by the Franklin Co ty
Commissioners, d staff recommen proval, consistent ith the policy to
islands of to -p within the City - its.
Vote on the finance - Mr. Refine ,yes; Mrs_ Boring, y ; Ms_ Chinnici-Zuer er, yes;
Mr. Pete yes; Mr_ McCash, ;Mayor Kranstu ,yes; Mr. Adamek, es.
Ordina ce 39-01 - An Ordin ce Authorizing th icy Manager to E er into as
Agree eat with the Union ounty Board o[ Co missioners for Se ces of the
Uni County Emergenc anagemen~
ch Lies Within Uni County.
. Hansiey stated that ff recotnrnends
e City formalize thi grcemen~
Vote on the Ordinan - Ms. Chinnici-Zu
damek, yes-
n for the Portion of a City of Dublin
Lion as Union Coun has requested that
r, yes; Mayor er, yes; Mr. Re er,
Boring, yes; . McCash, yes.
Ordinance 40- - An Ordinance epting the Lowes est Bid for the Ha as Hills
and MacBet acDuff Water Li and Sanitary Sew Improvements an Dublin
Manor Wa r Line Improveme Projects, and Dec ring an Emergenc .
Mr_ Hand stated that, based o direction at the last eeting, staff sent ou otica to all
affected idents regarding th' matter, including in rmation regazding a requirement
to tap i to a sewer line whe vailable, the possibi ty of requiring tap-i io the water
tine, d an estimate of cos for tap-in fees and t ring the line from a street to the
rest nce_ Some resides are present tonight t estify_
ll Bownas 7365 Be( -re Avenue stated he has been acting an ombudsman for
eir area for comm cation purposes. A estion has arisen o hether it is the City
intent to require res eats to tap-into ei r the sanitary sewer nes that presently e ~ t
on Bellaire or to a water line to be in led in the future, a letter indicates ~ is a
possibility_
Mr. Hansley ated that the City pr ently has an ordin a requiring sewer -in if the
line is avai le_ In terms of tap= to the water line, C until is not assessin the costs of
running t major line, anticipa ng that residents wi tap-in to the line wh available. It
would t make sense for the ity to make the inv eat if the resides do trot tap in to
the lin .Their only costs wo d be in bringing th fine from the street t the house, and
the t -in fees.
Kranstuber sumltlarized chat Council Jlad directed staff [o
~5-157Z
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Page i0 McUing
Hcld Apri123, 2001
•.uw
~ V tc on do - Mr. R - yes; Ms_ Chinnici- ercher, yes-, Mr_ M yes;
Mrs_ yes, Mr_ Pet yes; Mr_ Adamek, y ;Mayor Krdrtstu~ es_
V ie o ce - Mt cCash, yes; Mayor ber, yes-, Mr_ erson, Yes;
Mr_ ~ ,Yes; Mr_ Adam yes; Ms_ Chinnid- erctter, yes; Mcs_ ~ g, Yes.
dinance 55-01 - A rdinance Wairin ompetitive Biddia Regniremeats,
ursuant to Section .04 ("Contracting P ocedures"), Paragr ph C °Waiver of
Competitive Biddi g"~ for the Procur eat of Services to stall Approzimatel
140 Feet of Cur in Place Lining Wi in an Existing 48" Corm Sewer_
Mc Adamek in aced the ordinance
Mr_ Hansley - rcatcd that staff is r esting waiver of co petitive bidding as o tlined in
the merno_
Mrs. Burin ggested that a cap placed oa this proj in view of the si ion related
to the sou west traffic calming.
Mr_ H ty stated that staff ~ 1 be requesting adop on at the second rea ng and will
have a al amount prior to and of the cor-tracL
Th "1l be a second g and public hearin at the May 7 Counci meeting.
O iaance 56-01 - An rdinance Waiving mpetitive Bidding equircmeats,
rsuant to Section 8 ("Contracting Pr edures"), Parag h C (" Waiver of
ompetitive Biddin '), Cor the Procure nt o[Services to B ass Sanitary Sewe
Flow, Clean and T evise 4,500 Feet o[ anitary Sewer Lin
Mr_ Adamek intr aced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley st that staff will be r uesting passage at second reading_ memo
outlines the sp ific reasons for the r uest for waiver of b~ ding requirements_
There will be second reading and ublic hearing at the ay 7 Council meeti
Ordinan 57-O1 - Aa Ordiaa ce Authorizing the urchase of a 132 re, More or
Less, Tr ct of Land, From ert A_ Layman I Located at 5868 P t Road, City
of Dub n, County of Fran n, State of Ohio, a Declaring as Em gency_
Mr_ ek introduced th rdinance.
Mr_ mith noted that stn as reached agreem with Mr_ Layman the sale price and
r ests passage by em gency at this time_
ayor Kranstuber mo to dispense with t public hearing and or emergency passa _
r_ Adamek second the motion
Vote on the motion Mr_ Peterson, yes- .Boling, yes- Mr. einer, yes; Mr_ Ad ek,
yes; Mr_ McCas es; Mayor ICranstu~ ,Yes-
Vote on the Ord ante - Mr_ Reiner, ; Mr_ Peterson, yes- ayor ICranstuber, s- Mr_
McCash, yes; . Adamek, yes; M Boring, yes.
Ordinance 8-01 -An Ordinan Amending the An ual Appropriation Ordinance
for the Fi al Year Ending De ember 31, 2001.
Mr_ Ad ek introduced the or mance_
Ms_ G ~ sby stated that asp of the tree preserva on ordinance, fees a collected and
depos~ ed [o the general .Each year, those Mars are then appro ~ated for purchase
of tr es to be planted in p lit land within the ty_
McCash noted that a Wellington reside had previously re ested funds for
1 taping of the Bra d Road area, and as for an update.
. Hahn responded at Ms_ Wanner of P - g Division has ubmitted a grant
application to OD for the Wellington bdivision project taff is hopeful of
obtaining grant m ies for that specific rojecL
Mr_ Adamek mo ed to dispense with a public hearing_
Mr. Reiner sec ed the motion
Vote on the lion - Mr_ Adame es; Mr_ Peterson, y ;Mrs. Boring, yes; r_
McCash, ye ; Ms. Chinnici-Zuer er, yes; Mr_ Reiner es.
Vote on t Ordinance - Mr. M yes; Mr. Ad ek, yes; Mr_ Peterso ,yes; Ms_
Chinnici uercher, yes; Mrs_ ring, yes; Mr_ Rei r, yes.
Ordinance 59-01 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Purchase o[:
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Page 11 Meeting
Held Apri123, 2001
caw
or Less, Tract of Land, From Anacleto Calli, Located at the Northwest Cornu of
Avery Road and Wcernu Temple Road, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State
of Oh'w, and Declaring as Emergency. (Ballentrae Golf Course)
Mr. Adamelc introduced the ordnance.
Mr_ Smith noted that this provides for purchase of the Galli tract at approximately
546,000 pet acre_ One million will be paid to the seller this yeaz, and the rert-ainder is to
be paid next year. Staff is requesting emergency action.
Mr_ Adamek moved to dispense with the public hearing and treat this as emergency
legislation.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion_
Vote on the motion - Mr_ Peterson, yes; Mr_ Adamek, yes; Mr_ Reiner, yes; Ms_
Chinnici-Zuencher, Yes; Mt_ McCastr, Yes; Mrs. Boring, yes_
Vote on the Ordnance - Mr_ McCash, yes; Mr_ Peterson, yes; Mr_ Adamek, yes; Mr.
Reiner, Yes; Mrs- Boring. Yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuereher, yes.
Ordiaan 60-01- An Ordin ce Authorizing the urchase of a 3.26 re, More or
Less, T ct of Land, From P rks-Feidner, LTD., red at 5745 Av Road, City
of Du tn, County of Fran in, State of Ohio, a Declaring an Em gency.
(Bat ntrae Colf Course)
Mr damek introduced a ordinance.
. Smith stated that 'ordinance relates to a purchase of two ls_ The legal
'ption as attach correct, but the tit( of the ordinance n to be amended as
resentiy includes th tax mailing address r the landowner_ ordinance actually
relates to two lots ng Woemer-Tempi and therefore, the ti a should be amend
Mrs. Boring mov to clazify the title t eflect that the two p B being purchas aze
located along W einer-Temple Road are owned by P -Feidner, Ltd_ of 57 5
Avery Road.
Ms_ Chinnici uercher seconded motion_
Vote on the otion - Ms_ Chinni -Zuercher, yes; Mr_ eterson, yes; Mr. Re er, yes;
Mrs_ Bo ' ,Yes; Mr_ McCash, ; Mr. Adamek, y
Mr_ A ek moved to dspe with the public hen ng and to treat this emergency
legislaf a
Mr. P etson seconded the otion.
Vot on the motion - Mr_ einer, yes; Mrs_ Bo ' g, yes; Mr_ Adame yes; Mr. McCash,
y , Ms. Chinnici-Zuerc r, yes; Mr_ Peterso yes.
V to on the Ordinance Mrs_ Boring, yes; . Chinnici-Zuerche yes; Mr. Peterson,/
es; Mr. Reiner, yes; r_ Adamek, yes; Mr McCash, yes.
Ordinance 61-01 An Ordinance to
Bikepath Ease nt From AERC 1
Post Road, Ci of Dublin, County
an Emergent .
Mr_ Adame ntroduced the ordin ce
propriate a 0.211 ere, More or 1.r
imeter Lakes, [n ., Located South
Franklin, State Ohio, and Declar
Mr_ SmtW fated that this ord~ ante relates to ne tiations with the p perty
owner to e a bikepath ens ent in this location
Mr_ Ad ek moved to d- se with the pu c hearing and tre this as
emerg cy legislation_
Ms_ mtttci-Luercher nded the motion_
Vot on the motion - . McCash, yes; Mr. einer, yes; Mrs. B ng, yes; Mr_
A ek, yes; Mayor tuber, yes; Ms_ nnici-Zuercher, yes
to on the Ordin e - Mr. Adamek, Ms. Chinnici-Z cher, yes; Mr_
cCash, yes; Mr. tner, yes; Mrs_ Boni ,yes; Mayor her, yes_
Ordinance 62-0 - An Ordinance to ppropriate a 0.09 Acre, More or
Fee Simple I erect, a 0.114 re, More or Les , Permanent U " '
Easement, a a OS28 Acre, ore or Less, T porary Construe on
Easement, om HDB Limited artoership, Local d East of Wilcox oad
and North f Innovation Driv City of Dublin, C my of Franklin, to of
Ohio, an eclariog an Emer ency. (Southwest Irving - Wilcox R d)
Mr_ Ad ek introduced the o nartce_
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Mttutes of Dublin City Council Page 2 M~nB
Held
March l9, 2001
8_ Ms commented n the huge turnout success of the Bl Bash,
thanked the City o ials for staging this ent at the Wyndham_
~ Staff omments
~~ Mr_ ansle reported that a Law Department, citing in conjunction ~th the City's
T Division has colieu over 585,000 Burin past week in deli uent income taxes
i f corporations.
Mr. Smith reported a[ they were request to provide a legal op "on regarding a
proposal for the Ci to host an event co emoratirtg the Nati ai Day of Prayer_ H
will provide a fled memo on this to ounciL He summazi that under the
establishment c ,the City would prohibited from otg iiing or sponsoring
event cecogni ng the National Day Prayer_ There has n recent litigation o this
marier in the incinnati azea_ The lumbus Day of Pra is privately fund and
neither ed tar sponsored by e City of Columbus.
Mrs. Bo " g asked for clarificat rt that, should cmplo ees want to have an servance of
some before their woricd begins, held on Cit grounds, i_e_, a publi park, would
that acceptabte?
Mr_ ith responded that rayer breakfast psi or and sponsored by ity employees in
a lit park would not eate an issue.
r. McDaniel point uL that a memo was cluded in the packe egarding the outdoo
municipal pool and implementation sc ule for the mainten ce work_ Staff may
bring an additions propriation request o Council later in th ear, if needed.
Ordinance -Ol - An Ordinanc Authorizing the C~ Manager to Eoter nto a
Land Lea Agreement with t Starlight Rebekah odge 8856 For the urposes of
Constru ing Public Parking t [mprovementr o Vacant Lartd Own d by the Odd
Fellow ge at 37 Darby reef as a Part of th City's Ongoing E[( rtr to
Acco push Old Dublin I rovementr, artd D (acing an Emergen _
Mr. iazochi reported that a deed restriction h now been cleared u .The ordinance
pr ides for a land lease or 30 years, with sev cal extension clauses right of firs[ refusal
o the pact of the City " the Lodge should d ide to sell the prop ; and a mechanism t
tablish fair market lue, should that eve occur. The City is terested in the grope y
on a 30-year lease b is for the purposes a public parking lot mprovement, and a
concept drawing provided to Court with I8 spaces on site_ There are also
provisions inclu to provide access the Starlight Rebe Lodge to eight spa for
two days per nth for lodge meeti s, and accommodati s for special pazkin n this
site for three four events each ye r_ Beyond that, it w ld be a public parki facility_
The leaser is $3,500 per year, nd there is an escala r clause included sh ld the
taxes incr a due to the improv menu made to the p perty by the City_
Mrs_ Bo ng asked if the City ould be responsible r paying the normal crease in
taxes "ch occur during the aluation process ev few years_
Mr. arochi responded th the City is responsi a only for tax increas which are a
res of improvements [o he properly made b he City, not the no 1 valuation
~ayor Krartstuber mo ed to treat this as a rgency legislation.
r_ Adamek second the motion.
Vote on the mono Mr_ Peterson, yes; r. Adamek, yes; Mr cCash, yes; Mrs_
Boring, yes; Ms. hinnici-Zuercher, y ;Mayor Kranstuber, es; Mr_ Reiner, yes.
Vote on the Or ante - Ms_ Chronic" Zuercher, yes; Mr_ h, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, y ; Mr_ Peterson, yes; r_ Adamek, yes; M Boring, yes; Mr_ Re er, yes.
Ordinance 30-01- An Ordinance to Appropriate a 36.748 Acre, Moce or Less, Fee
Simple Interest (1.8530 Acres, More or Less, to be Used for Right-of--Way and
34.895 Acres, More or Less, to be Used for Parkland) from Anacleto Galli, Trustee,
Located at the Northwest Corner of Avery Road and Woerner-Temple Road, City
~5-~ 57Z
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutas of Dublin City Council Pagc 3 Mating
Held
March 19, 2001
of Dublin, Connty of Franklia, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency_
Mayor Krartstuber stated that negotiations are still underway, and moved to table the
hearing of the ordinance until the April 2 Council meeting_
Mr_ Adamek seconded the ntoiion_
Vote on the tttotion - Mr_ McCash, yes; Ms_ Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr_ Adamek, Yes;
Mr_ Peterson, Yes; Mr_ Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, Yes; Mayor Krattstuber, yes_
rdinaace 26-01 - Ordinance Amend" g Certain Sections t Ordinance 98-96
("Compensation P1 ") Regarding Wag /Salaries for Non- ion Personae4
Mc Hansley stated at a detailed memo ' attached, and staff' i recommending ado ion
at this time_
Mrs_ Boring as d about the timef for filling the positi authorized by thi
orditance_
Mr_ Hazding nded that staff is n the process of do so_ The positions
advertised th a proposed pay gr a range, with the etstanding that the de could
be Chang during the legislativ process_
Vote on a Ordinance - Mr_ P erson, yes; Mr_ M yes; Mr_ Adam ,yes; Ms_
Chinni -Zuercher, yes; May Kranstuber, yes; M -Reiner, yes; Mrs_ B ring, yes_
Or ance 27-01 - Aa O dinance AuWorizin the City Manager Enter iota an
A Bement with the Bo rd of Trustees of W shington Townshi Franklin,
laware and Union ounties, Ohio [or t City of Dublin to ovide
ommun-tcations Se ices.
Mr. Hansley stated t at a detailed memo provided at the fir reading_ The fire c ref
and police chief az present as well to r and to any questio
Vote on the Ordi rice - Ms_ Chinnici- uercher, yes; Mr_ P rson, yes; Mr. McC h,
yes; Mayor Kra stuber, yes; Mr_ Ada ek, yes; Mr. Reiner es; Mrs_ Boring, y -
Ordinance -01 - An Ordiaanc Accepting the Low t/Best Bid for Rig -of--Way
Maintena a in the City of Du tn, and Declaring a Emergency.
Mr_ Hans y stated that staff is commending passa by emergency in or er to preserve
the bid p res.
Mayor nstubec moved fo emergency passage_
Mr. amek seconded the otion.
Vot on the motion - Ms_ innici-Zuercher, y ;Mrs_ Boling, yes; r. McCash, yes;
M Adamek, yes; Mr_ P erson, yes; Mayor nstubec, yes; Mr. finer, yes.
V to on the Ordinance Mr_ McCash, yes; r_ Reiner, yes; Ms_ innici-Zuercher, y ;
ayor Kranstuber, y ; Mr_ Adamek, yes; r_ Peterson, yes; M .Boring, yes_
Ordinance 31-01 An Ordinance W lag Competitive B" ding Requiremen ,
Pursuant to Sec oa 8.04 ("ContracC g Procedures"), P agraph C ("Waive of
Competitive B' ding") for Alcohol' Beverages for the ublin Irish Festiv
Mr_ Hattsley r orted that a memo as provided to Cou tl regarding the ne for this
legislation. r_ Hardin, and Ms_ uskarcik are present o respond to questi
Vote on th Ordinance - Mrs_ B 'rig, yes; Mr_ Peters ,yes; Mr_ Adame es; Ms_
Chinnici- uercher, yes, Mr_ R ner, yes; Mayor Kr suber, yes; Mr_ M sh, yes.
[NTR DUCTION & FI READIiVC: -O lNANCES
Drdi ance 32-01 - An O finance Amending a Annual Approp ations for the
Fis 1 Year Ending De tuber 3l, 2001.
M _ Adamek introdu he ordinance.
c Hansley stated th a memo is attached. Staff is recommend- g that this be held
or second reading o April 2_
Mrs_ Boring asked r clarification of w cit building is propo ed for renovation.
Mr_ Hansley state that this renovation ~ for the new garag t was built when e
previous parkin area was renovated to office space.
There will be econd reading/publ~ hearing at the Apn Counc
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Mmutcs of Dublin City Council Page 5 Ming
EicM March S, 2001
Mr_ A ek introduced the diaance_
Mr_ S ith explained that i City is purchasiag t and has cntered i o a swap
agr eat with the Wads orths, pursuant to th direction of Counci o resolve their
sit tion_ The details w be worked out prio o closiag.
yor Kranstuber tno to treat this as em gency legislation.
_ Chitinici-Zuerch seconded the motto _
Vote on the motion Mr. Reiaer, yes; M or Kranstuber, yes; s_ Chinnici-Zuerch ,
yes; Mrs_ Boring, es; Mr_ Peterson, y Mr_ Adamek, yes_
Vote on the Ord ante - Mr_ Peterson es; Mr_ Adamek, y ; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Chinnici-Zuerc er, yes; Mayor Klan uber, yes; Mrs. Bori g, yes.
Ordiaance 30-01 - An Ordinance to Appropriate a 36.748 Acre, More or Less, Fee
Simple Interest (1.8530 Acres, More or Less, to be Used for Right-o[ Way and
34.895 Acres, More or Less, to be Used for Parkland) from Anacteto Galli, Trustee,
Located at the Northwest Corner of Avery Road sari Wcerner-Temple Road, City
of Dublin, County of Franklin, State o[ Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency_
Mr_ Adamek introduced the ordinance_
Mayor Kranstuber moved to table the hearing of the ordinance until March 19, based
upon the Law Director's reconunendation.
Mr_ Adamek seconded the motion_
Vole on the motion - Mr_ Peterson, yes; Mr_ Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr_
Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs_ Boring, yes.
Ordinance 31- I - An Ordinaace ~ giving Competitiv idding Requireme ts,
Pursuant to [ion 8.04 ("Contr ling Procedures"), aragraph C ("Wai er of
Competitiv idding") for Alco lit Beverages Cor t e Dub[ia Irish Felt al_
Mr. Adam introduced the ordi nce. Mr_ Hansley s led that this allows a City to
purchase lcofiol for the Dubli nsh Festiva(, as out ned in the memo. re will be a
second ding/public hearts at the March 19 Co cii meeting.
e lution 23-01 - A R olution to Set Fort a Statement of Ser ces to be Provided
t be Area in a Propo ed Aanexation o[ 5 +/- Acres Crom Wa ington Township,
~~ raaklin County tot a City of Dub[ia, O io, as Required by ection 709.031 of t
Ohio Revised Code (Stanley W_ Wood fC, petitioner, Mic gel S_ Yashko, Esq_ o
Roetzel & Andres , 155 E_ Broad Stre 12'h Floor, Cotu us, OH 43215, ag t
~~~_ ~- for petitioner)
~~' ^ ~ Mr_ Adamek int duced the resolutio Mr_ Hansley slat ai this legislation i
v' required by st a code prior to the a exation hearing bef a the Franklin Cou
dry Commission s_ Per state taw, aft approval by the co ty commissioners receipt of
\~,~, the transcn ,the Cleric will hol he ordinance for 60 ays prior to placeme ton the
~` Council a ends for considerati
Vote on a Resolution - Mr_ damek, yes; Mrs_ B ring, yes; Mr_ Peters n, yes; Mr.
Reims es; Mayor Kranstu ,yes; Ms_ Chronic- uercher, yes.
Res lution 24-01 - A R olution Authorizin the Regulation of affic oo Muirfield
D ve and Other Roa in Muirfield Villa and FVaiving Cert n Provisions of the
blin Sign Code D ing the Annual Me orial Tournament
r. Hansley stated t t this legislation is ought forward each ear to allow regulati
of traffic and to pr ide for relaxation o he sign code during a Toumament_ Sta
recommends ado ion at this time_
Vote on the Res ution - Ms. Chinni -Zuercher, yes; May r Kranstuber, yes; _
Reiner, yes; .Peterson, yes; Mr. damek, yes; Mrs_ B ~ng, yes.
Resolution 5-0I - A Resolutio of Inteat to Appro riate a 0.1008 Acre ore or
Less, Te ovary Constructio Easement from Bl the M_ Norris, Lo sled South of
Wcerne -Temple Road, Cit of Dublin, County Franklin, State ~f 6:n
Mr_ A ek introduced the esolution_
~5-157Z
The Glade at Ballantrae
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Ming
Dublin City Council Meeting Page b
Held ~ t ~ ~ ; .
followed.
. McCash inquired if property to the so th of this parcel is ebped_
. Clarke responded t the property is ed for residential de elopment, but a
liminary plat for tshops Crossing may of yet have been ved by Council.
Mr. McCash no that with the strip se aside to provide to the uorthwcst etro
Park, it will be i erecting to see if the intend to use it as a de_ He added that or the
record., he wou not be interested in ding this for densi in another develop nt_
Mr. Hansle larificd that no one as requested any de rty credit in cortjunc ort with
the Metro arks land donation.
Ms. Cl a stated that the pla filed for Bishop's C 'ng includes aloe its nortitem
edge a-half of a trail cyst providing access f m the Metro Park t Dublin park
cycle .Staff will continu to work with the M Parks Board to ain necessary
ents through future velopments_
ote on the Resotutio _ Mr_ Peterson, yes; _ Boring, yes; . McCash, yes: Vice
ayor Adamek, yes- .Reiner, yes.
Resolution 07-01 A Resolution Esta fishing a Child Ca Advisory Task F ce.
Mr. McDaniel s led that the establis nt of this task fo is done annually.
than using a co mission, a task for is used to assist st with the developme t of the
child care br hure that is updated d published annual
Vote on th Resolution. Mt_ Mush, yes; Mrs_ Boril(g, yes; Mr_ Peterson yes; Mr-
Reiner, y s; Vice Mayor Adam k, yes.
Resolution 08-01 - A Resolution of Intent to Appropriate a 36.748 Acre, More
or Less, Fee Simple Interest, From Anadeto Gall't, Trustee, Located at the
Northwest Corner of Avery Road and Wcerner-Temple Road, City of Dublin,
County of Franklin, State of Ohio.
Vice Mayor Adamek introduced [he resolution.
Mr. Smith noted that there is a confidential memo in Council packets concerning the
Galli tract. This is vacant property at the entrance to the Edwards golf course
development that has been targeted not only for parkland, bu[ also to realign
Wcemer-Temple Road_ The road will be directed to the north away from the
property owners so that rto one will be forced to move, pursuant to the Cicy's
previous commitment. There has been significant correspondence with Mr_ Galli,
and the City appraiser has spoken with him. Mr_ Smith has spoken with Mr_ Galli's
attorney, who indicates that after passage of the resolution, he would meet with City
officials to negotiate a price.
Vote on the Resolution- Mr_ Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs_ Boring, yes: Mr_
McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Adamek, yes.
F" al Plat - [Cillilea S lion 4
s. Clarke stated tha this is a single-farm subdivision of 23 1 is in the western on
of Killilea, which is ing developed by a Edwards group. a biggest issue is
bikepath connecti _ This plat provid for a sidewalk coon lion between the st
and the bikepath hick is being facili led by the Edwards ompany and Mr. H ciao,
who granted City an easement th ugh his tot. She ad that the plat is
straightforwar and completely co orms to the prelimi development pla _
There were questions.
Mr_ Reiner ved approval of final plat
Vice May r Adamek secon emotion.
Vote on emotion: Mrs. B ng, yes; Vice Mayo Adamek, yes: Mr
OS-1572
The Glade at Ballantrae
The Glade at Ballantrae
Development Text
Site Overview:
The site is presently agricultural land with generally flat and featureless terrain. The site
offers little in the way of natural features to add interest, other than several small tree
lines. No active streams are present, with existing drainage being achieved through the
use of tiles and ditches.
Provision of Utilities:
Sanitary sewer is available to the area through two existing lines in the Kendall Ridge
subdivision.
Water is also available through Kendall Ridge and Ballantrae.
Stormwater management for the site will outlet into Kendall Ridge. There is already
adequate stormwater retention capacity in the Kendall Ridge basins.
Homesites for this development are sized from a minimum of 70' up to 90' at the building
line. There are 28 homesites on 15.788 acres.
Front Yard Setback Varies (25' to 35')
Side_Yard Setback: 7' minimum (15 feet total)
Rear Yard Setback: 25'
Rights of Way: 50 feet
Pavement Widths: 28 feet
Public Sidewalks: 4' minimum unless noted as bike path
Bike Paths: 8'
Street Trees: 25' to 50' on center (2 '/2" caliper)
Fencing: Per Code
Outdoor Storage: No prefabricated storage/outbuildings permitted
Mailboxes: Standard Community design required
Outdoor Lighting: Post light at driveway -Photocell required
I~
Minimum Garage Size: 2-car minimum
Maximum Height: 35' per Code
Roof Materials: Dimensional shingles required
Architectural Detailing: Blank walls prohibited
• All windows must be trimmed on all four sides of
the structure.
• Brick and stone used on the front must be
repeated in some form (water table, chimney,
corner wrap, etc.) on all remaining sides.
'Exterior Colors: Natural earthtones; warm, neutral colors; white
General Terms:
Front Yard Setbacks: Setbacks from the dedicated road rights-of--way in the subdivision
will vary from 25' to 35' in order to stagger the homesites along the streetscape to add
interest and variety.
The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) shall be responsible for the administration
of varied setbacks in accordance with the approved text.
Side Yard Setbacks: The minimum side yard setback shall be a total of 15' with a
minimum of 7' on one side. Where a side yard is adjacent to a public street, the side yard
must adhere to the platted building line.
~! No Build Zones: A No Build Zone to keep those areas free from obstructions shall cover
the rear 25' of all lots within the subdivision and 10' on side yards abutting park areas. A
definition is contained within the City of Dublin Codified Ordinance Section 152.002.
Landscaping may be permitted in No Build Zones with advance approval from the
Architectural Review Committee (ARC). Nothing herein shall prohibit the installation of
utility lines and structures necessary to serve the subdivision. No Build Zones will be
indicated on the subdivision plat on each lot.
Permitted Materials:
I) Permitted materials for all subareas and product types include: Brick, Stone, Stucco,
Wood Siding and Cementitious Siding (Nardi-Plank).
Due to the size and anticipated duration of this project and the constant advances in
technology, the Applicant reserves the right to present newly engineered/developed
exterior materials to the Planning Commission for their approval and inclusion on the
approved materials list for this project.
Architecturally designed homes using all stucco on the exterior may be permitted, subjCct
to the review of the ARC. Appropriate application methods, as well as the use of primary
and/or secondary design treatments consistent with the architecture, must be incorporated
into the design.
The Glade at Ballantrae Development Text 2
January 12, 2006
Architectural Detailing:
• Design elements and details must be repeated throughout all faces of the structure.
• Windows must be present on all four sides of the structure in a manner consistent
with the treatment used on the front of the home.
• Blank walls are prohibited.
• All windows must be trimmed with wood on all four sides of the structures using
stucco, wood siding, Hardi-Plank or vinyl on the exterior. (No wood trim is required
when windows are surrounded by brick or stone).
• When brick or stone are used on the front elevation of the home, it must be repeated
in some form (water table, chimney, corner wrap, or similar treatment) on the
remaining faces of the home.
Colors:
Colors shall be used to "pull together" and provide a sense of visual unification of the
exterior materials. Natural earthtones or neutral colors on the warm scale that blend with
the natural landscape (tans, browns, warm grays, etc.) are preferred. White is considered
an acceptable neutral color.
Chimneys:
No "cantilevered" or "through the wall" chimneys are permitted. All chimneys must be
built on an integral foundation using brick or stone on the exterior. Homes constructed
using thematic architecture that require all stucco on the exterior, may be permitted to use
stucco as a chimney material with ARC approval. Other variations not expressly
permitted must be approved by the Planning Commission.
Chimney Styles Not Approved:
_-- _~ _ --_- ___ `-'-i
~~
-~~ + fy~^..--~
_ _ ~ _ ~"f /l ~ - .-
- ~- ~ wiwY ~~r -_
"Through-the-Wall" Style Unapproved Materials "Cantilevered" Style
The Glade at Ballantrae Development Text 3
January 12, 2006
Accessory Structures:
Architecturally designed accessory structures attached to the main structure or garage
within the building footprint and constructed of the same materials as the main structure
or garage, may be permitted with ARC approval.
Sidewalks, Bikepaths and Street Trees:
Four-foot sidewalks will be installed on both sides of the streets within the single family
subdivision to provide for pedestrian traffic. Street trees will be installed on every lot.
Bikepaths will connect the streets to the park areas on the north and south ends of the
subdivision.
Tree Preservation:
It is our intent to use our reasonable, good-faith efforts to conserve and protect the
maximum number of existing trees in the tree stands, fence rows, etc. within the project
area It is to the distinct benefit of the applicant, as well as our future homeowners and
the community at large, to do so:
• The applicant has incorporated existing tree stands, fence row and vegetation into the
plan in a manner intended to preserve them where possible.
• Tree preservation zones will be established where appropriate.
• Reasonable, good-faith effort, consistent with the plan, shall be made during site
engineering (utilities, roads, drainage, grading, etc.) to avoid the unnecessary removal
of trees and to protect critical root zones of trees in and adjacent to the project area.
• Construction activities shall be undertaken in a manner consistent with the protection
of existing trees. Protective fencing will be erected and maintained during the entire
construction period. Construction vehicles, materials, and spoils will be prohibited
within the tree preservation area or the critical root zones of protected trees.
• Trees located in areas where removal will take place may be relocated (if feasible and
appropriate) for use elsewhere on the site.
Tree Preservation Zones:
A tree preservation zone is an area that will not be physically disturbed in order to
preserve existing natural or new landscape features. Trees or other significant vegetation
must remain in their natural condition and may not be removed from such a zone.
Utilities may be located in a tree preservation zone, if necessary, and designed to
minimize impacts. All structures, including, but not limited to buildings, parking,
driveways, sidewalks, sheds, swimming pools, patios, decks or other accessory structures,
fences, antennae and basketball courts or other sport courts are prohibited within a tree
preservation zone.
Additional landscaping shall be permitted within the tree preservation zones, provided
that all planting is done outside of any critical root zone, as defined by the Dublin Zoning
Code.
The Glade at Ballantrae Development Text
January 12, 2006
4
Parks/Reserves
All Parks/Reserves shall be constructed, including fine grading and seeding, prior to
dedication to the city and prior to occupancy of the first lot by a homeowner within the
respective section. A landscape buffer will be planted along all adjacent park areas.
Homeowners Association:
This site will be added to the Ballantrae Homeowners Association, which will provide for
the maintenance of certain Reserves, entry features and greenspace/buffer areas.
The Glade at Ballantrae Development Text
January 12, 2006
\ \tlM10A7A/\S'i
MM/G\PAO.£C/\TOW072~\POP 5(.6wAAt \/~°-D.ONGd7EQ~ONAt> - I Al1EF.~ WA 7CRSVCDS - LAST j11fD BY Q41QON5 [//1D/Y000 /l: fA~19 AVJ - MOTiEO BY Q4IG~pNS (//19/7QM /I:7Gb ANI
I
`A`~T
`V
V``~
V
~.
~~\
~ ~(\\.
$ 5 5 5 5 < <
m ~ PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN for:
~ 6 ~ ~ ~ 6 ~„n o
~~;
~~ GLADE AT BALLANTRAE
o ~g~
~
s ~Q,o CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
~~
~ ~
~bs
~ m ~ m R g ~ g' o REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s
_ __
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _; g ~ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN for:
~o Hp,mo4 i~8~'~'
°~=NNL~L~ GLADE AT BALLANTRAE
Yi~j~
~ . ~ ~~ ~ CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
~ ~ ~~
a ~ ~ ~ ~ < e~K' EXISTING CONDITIONS
~ gg gg N yg' gg a
'~ 83 ~8 & a'.{
~.~Y.~y,
~~ ,..
,~ ~t
F ~ `T
sir- z;
r . ....
',
':z
? o '.
'. I Im '.
~.',°
=:~` - _
is ,
. Ea~~i :~E: ~~ ~~
O
t~n yOy O
~f R~+ O O O O
ym tyn tyn tyn ~ O ~
-i O
.. S L~ ~n [n O n W i ~
C a ~ ~
R n ;> W ~ D ~Y
~ ~ ~ $ ~ c C9P
F' ~ 'S~ ~p
^~ ~ c g o
5 n o = ~ a
Fy1, n o r
a, ~
6E c ~~ 5~ ^~ 6 ~r ~m ~ 5~ 9 ~ O Oy
^'
~ .o.
~ gg 44
~ryxG ma n{aj; ~~ m
Sfi
~i~ ~&gR ~a
n
~ ~p
ipro
~
~
~Y 'Q
O
M
r
~ a ,$ 5G g~~ ~S ~ gO}O f]m C~°O
Si. C7 .._a ~ D
n
a m a ~ K ~ 6
`°
F .
~~ ° a ~n ~
S d
~ S ~ Y °~ n
~ ~
e. ~ ~m
o
n < c 5~ o
C 0 0
~
~
'
a
o N= d °o ~ ~m ff' n x rn ~
n c € ~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~z ~. Imo ~ ~
^ s ~
o ~^
o
a
a~F.o °
o =~Sd
J
o ~,
n N ,~° '~
~ 8 p
o P
~ c
N
^
n w J ~ ^
~
,g 6.
r'
~m
~ r~ ~
~, a ~' B. F
`
a3 r ~ 5'
~~ F
~ ~ '"
~ ~
o ~ ,5~
S
n
_~
y~y.~.~
l-l
y
H
Ci
8
g
~
~, ~ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN for:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.~
i~~~~ GLADE AT BALLANTRAE
~~~
~ i a~ ~ CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
8 ~ n
s" SITE PLAN
a' ~
~~
=
~ ~ ~ ~ s
.~~o ~x
R~
w
~~
x
~
a
_
_ ~
<.i$~a~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\dwOAtAI \51R(M/C1~1..EC113PD~9111 \PCp S'(.61MR.LL\PoP-dDYtJ~IEfAIU - i JtAEF.• MA 7E7P9IED5 - usr S~~ED er CMdiNS (I/19/499E II: 19:79 AYJ - PL017ED BY pl/CCMS (I/19/YU7B i1: J0..39 AYJ
It
~
~ < ~ W
~ HOC
o T
m
~x
i m
~]
>~ Z m~rD-
tn20CZ
u ~~
y ~~Tm~
n
m oe
S9
se
,S9
25' TPZ
' 25' TPZ ~
o ~ $ ~
~ ~ V
~ N
~
D
= ,Ofl
69 5• 59
21
• g6. -~
~ I ~~ / \ ~_
~ ',.
~ rr
( 1
&~Y
fV
~~ I ~
-~---
~I~
in
-~
3.50'
~ MAXIMUM
~ Amp
y Apo
y 8Dp D>p
O D ~o
y o~ N ~ A O
1 ~O
y y~ N
n N
o- o~N
7 x'r ~~..
7 0~
7
0
`~ ~ $
~S
z >>'~~
N '0_01 S
m m c 4 0
O ~ h m 0
O
A N O A a
O 'o ~ m O
C
o n~ 3
c o?so'
a
o rn
n> ~om•- r
m t > S y
~ t•~ w
~~~0 ;
~oN~ ~
° S''~ a
~ F ~ m ~
n ~ n 'n
Nm T
c °.O 2
~ o n ~
3ov
a a
n
~'-,~n
?~o
4 ~ .
~+ QO
Ot tr ,
A A O
~$ 5 5 5 5 5 5 ~ so ~ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN for:
~~~~~~m ; ~~s.a
.r ~ m GLADE AT BALLANTRAE
~,~a
~s~~
g ~ ~ CITY OF DUBLIN, OHiO
f.
^s
~ ~ R ~ ~ Sou DETAIL PLAN !!11\\~V ;
~ ~ € 8 8 ~ ' 4 ° ~ ' ~~'~\ \ emu,
~~~~~
__
STAFF REPORT
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JANUARY 5, 2006
C11"Y OF` h)LIBLI~,.
Land Use and
long Range Planning
5800 Shier•Rings Raad
Dublin, Ohio 43016.123b
Phone:bl4-410-4600
Fax:bl4-410-4147
Vleb Site: vrvnv.dublin.oh.us
8. Rezoning - OS-1822 - Schoedinger Funeral Home - 6055 Emerald Parkway
Location: 8.8 acres located on the west side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of
Innovation Drive.
Existing Zoning: RI, Restricted Industrial District.
Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District
under the provisions of Section 1 S3.OS3.
Proposed Use: An 11,000-square-foot funeral home with a 3,000-square-foot reception
center, and a 32,000-square-foot office development.
Applicant: Applied Innovation, 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016;
represented by Nick Cavalaris, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725,
Columbus, Ohio 4321 S.
Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner.
Contact Information: (614) 410-4644/Email: jadkins@dubiin.oh.us.
BACKGROUND:
Case Summary:
The concept plan was heard at City Council on December 12, 2005, and at the Planning and
Zoning Commission on October 6, 2005. The main issue discussed at both meetings regarded
the traffic impacts of the proposed uses on the road network, and the applicants request for a
right-in/right-out entrance on Emerald Parkway. The Commission specifically requested more
information regarding this issue and that the applicant work with staff to resolve the access
issues. The Commission suggested that the applicant meet with the residents and increase the
protection of the stream corridor. The Commission also recommended improvements to the
design of the office area and its density. The applicant has worked with staff to resolve these
issues and staff recommends approval with conditions.
Case Procedure:
The purpose of the PUD process is generally similar to the previous process, in that it encourages
imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive
manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering
principles. The new PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages:
1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, andlor City Council review and comment);
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January S, 2006
Page 2 of 7
2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission
recommends and City Council approves/denies); and
3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves/denies}.
The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the
general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and
Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development
plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be returned to City Council for a public
hearing and final vote. Atwo-thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative
recommendation by the Commission. Tf approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days
following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final
development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction.
Review Criteria:
in accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following
criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning):
1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of
the Dublin Zoning Code;
2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan,
Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not
unreasonably burden the existing street network;
3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity
and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the
surrounding areas;
4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property
within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded;
5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the
objectives of the Community Plan;
6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and
protects the natural resources of the site;
7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and/or necessary facilities have been or
are being provided.
8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to
minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety
and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed
development provides for a safe, convenient and non-conflicting circulation system for
motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians;
9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides
for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the Iarger
community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community;
10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between
buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking
areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of
the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City;
11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain,
as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 3 of 7
12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify
any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning
Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent
of the Planned Development District regulations;
13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the
surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City;
14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed
infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the
intended overall development;
1 S) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public
improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and
16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the
Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Site Characteristics:
• Site Description. The 8.8-acre site has frontage along Emerald Parkway and Innovation
Drive. The site is currently undeveloped with some large mature tree stands and
undergrowth and a stream along the northern property line. This site is located in the
southwest area of Dublin, with good visibility along Emerald Parkway.
• Zoning. The site is currently zoned RI, Restricted Industrial District. The current zoning
permits manufacturing and industrial uses, and office as a conditional use. The proposed
use for a funeral home and office complex is not permitted within this district and
therefore a rezoning is necessary. To the west and south is vacant land zoned RI. To the
north is an AEP facility zoned Ri and land to the east is currently zoned PCD, Planned
Commerce District, and also vacant.
Community Plan:
• Future Land Use. The Future Land Use Map in the Community Plan shows this site as
"Office." Land use designations were assigned based on comprehensive traffic studies
for the City. The proposed uses of funeral home and office are consistent with the Future
Land Use plan.
Site Layout:
• General Layout. The proposal is divided into two Subareas. Subarea A on the eastern
portion of the site includes an approximately 11,700-square-foot funeral home building
with an adjacent 3,000-square-foot reception center building. Subarea B on the western
portion of the site, includes a group of office buildings with a maximum square footage
of 32,000 square feet.
• Subarea A. The funeral home in Subarea A is proposed at the intersection of Emerald
Parkway and Innovation Drive. The funeral home is proposed at an angle to the
intersection in order to create a more interesting street aesthetic. The Subarea plan
indicates a reception center in association with the funeral home adjacent to the 2.5-acre
stormwater pond. Parking for the funeral home facility is proposed generally on the
north and west sides of the building. An additional stormwater pond is proposed at the
southeast corner of the site.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 4 of 7
Subarea B. The office buildings are proposed along Innovation Drive, west of the funeral
home. A large pond is proposed to the north of the office buildings, along the creek area.
The parking will generally be south of the buildings.
Development Standards:
• Permitted Uses and Density. The proposed development text outlines the permitted uses
for the site by Subarea. Subarea A includes funeral home uses with no embalming or
cremating services, and a reception center with a remembrance garden. The total
maximum square footage for this Subarea is 14,700 square feet for a density of 3,340
square feet per acre. Subarea B includes the uses permitted in SO, Suburban Office and
Institutional District and will have a maximum total square footage of 32,000 square feet
for a density of 7,272 square feet per acre.
• Reception Center and Remembrance Garden. The reception center is intended for
private receptions associated with the funeral home; however, it may also be reserved for
various types of civic, business, and nonprofit organizations. The proposed remembrance
garden will be located close to the reception center and will be a small passive space with
benches and a walking path.
• Setbacks. The proposed setbacks are based on the existing right-of--way and are indicated
as 25 feet for pavement and 100 feet for buildings on Emerald Parkway and Innovation
Drive for both Subareas. The text indicates a zero pavement setback for the shared
driveway between the two Subareas. The setback for the reception center is 50 feet from
the north property line and the lot coverage maximum is 70 percent for both Subareas.
This is consistent with surrounding planned districts.
• Landscaping. The proposed text indicates that the site will include a naturalized pond
along the stream corridor with indigenous plant materials. The text states that both
ponds, including the pond at the southeast corner of the site will have ornamental trees
and flowering shrubs in groupings to create an informal planting.
• Landscape Buffer. The text also includes a 25-foot landscape buffer along Emerald
Parkway and Innovation Drive that will coordinate with existing landscape treatments on
Emerald Parkway. Further detail will be required at the final development plan. The
remaining landscaping will meet or exceed Code as outlined in the text.
• Parking. The text indicates that parking shall meet Code.
Traffic:
• Traffic Study. A traffic impact study has been submitted to the City. The applicant will
be responsible for re-striping the center lane on Innovation Drive to allow Ieft-hand turns
into the site at the shared access point for Subarea A and B. When Subarea B is built, the
applicant for that project will have to re-stripe Innovation Drive for alert-hand turn lane
at the western property line.
• Signalization Warrant/Intersection Improvements. The traffic impact study did not
include a signal warrant analysis based on the minimal intersection impacts derived from
the study. Staff is working with the applicant to create a supplemental study that will
determine if the site generated traffic will cause a signal warrant and require the
installation of a traffic signal at the Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway intersection,
or if other intersection improvements are needed. If a warrant is not met, the applicant is
looking at the proposed developments in the area to determine if, and when warrants may
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 5 of 7
possibly be met or what other intersection improvements may be needed. As a result, the
City Engineer will determine if the applicant will need to contribute to the signal
installation or other intersection improvements and what percentage is the applicant's
responsibility. The Applicant needs to continue to finalize this supplement to the traffic
impact study to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Access Management. The approved and constructed roadway plans do not allow for a
curb cut along Emerald Parkway. Emerald Parkway was built to be a minor arterial with
controlled access points. Extensive research and forethought went into the design of
Emerald Parkway to ensure traffic flow is optimal. The traffic study submitted does not
show that the curb cut will benefit the roadway system and therefore, the City Engineer is
not inclined to allow a curb cut on this road. The applicant has agreed that the access on
Emerald Parkway is not necessary far their operations and staff requests that this access
be eliminated from all plans.
Private Streets. Pavement within the parking areas should meet the City Engineer's
requirements for strength and durability. Turning movements of waste hauling and
emergency vehicles must be accounted for in designing curves and turning radii. Private
drives should be a minimum of 22-feet wide (this is our standard for drive aisles in
parking lots).
Utilities:
• Water Supply. There is a 16" waterline on the west side of Emerald Parkway and a 12"
waterline on the North side of Innovation. The applicant is indicating that they will
utilize the water main on the north side of Innovation Drive.
• Sanitary Sewer Service. A 21" sanitary sewer runs long the north side of the creek that
borders the northern property line of this property. The applicant is indicating that they
will tie into this line to service both Subareas.
• Stormwater Management. The project will be required to meet the requirements of the
Stormwater Regulations. A portion of the site is located in the Cosgray Creek watershed
of the Stormwater Master Plan and a very small portion is in the Cramer Creek
Watershed. The applicant has not submitted preliminary calculations, however, water
features are shown on the plan, which may be providing Stormwater controls. Staff
recommends that the applicant meet with the Division of Engineering to discuss
stormwater management on the site. The plans show that the pond at the corner of
Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway is partially in a utility easement, this will have to
be eliminated from the easement.
• Floodplaln. The property has a substantial creek running along the northern property line
with associated Floodplain. The applicant will need to comply with the Flood Control
Ordinance. The pond towards the northern property line is shown in the Floodway + 20
feet and will have to be moved out of that area.
Architecture:
• Architecture. The proposed text indicates that the architecture and color palette will be
similar to the Thomas Kohler PCD and will consist of earth tones and muted natural
tones and materials. The text also states that the scale of the buildings will be aided by
the use of porticos, dormers, recesses, awnings and other elements to break up the
massing of the building. The applicant has submitted preliminary architecture for the
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 6 of 7
funeral home and reception center. Staff believes that the proposed architecture begins to
address the intent of the text and incorporates the required design elements such as
porticos, dormers, and natural earth tone materials. However, the architecture includes
some Colonial-type architectural design elements, including a cupola with a bell, that do
not coordinate with the style of surrounding developments. Staff does not believe that a
bell is appropriate for this area in such close proximity to residents. Staff believes that
the proposed site is a prominent location and should utilize dramatic and striking
architecture. Staff believes that the funeral building should utilize varied roof pitches and
massing to create a more interesting and impressive facade at the intersection. Staff will
continue to work with the applicant to create high quality signature architecture
throughout the development.
Architectural Materials. The proposed materials in the text include stone with limestone
detailing, wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar materials used
as accents with brick or stone veneer. The applicant has not listed brick as a permitted
building material and staff recommends that the text be revised to include brick. Roofing
materials are indicated as standing seam, cedar shake, or asphalt shingles. Staff
recommends that the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional.
Signage:
• Proposed Signs. The site is permitted by Code to have one sign in Subarea B, and two
signs in Subarea A. The applicant is proposing that all signage utilize muted colors and
coordinate with the architecture. The text indicates that Subarea B signage will meet
Code. The two signs in Subarea A are required to face each right-of--way and be no
closer than two-third the length of the longest street frontage, or 250 feet. The applicant
is proposing that one monument sign shall be located on Emerald Parkway, toward the
northern edge of Subarea A, and the other monument sign will generally be at the corner
of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive, angled at the intersection. The proposed
locations of these two signs are facing generally the same right-of--way and do not meet
the minimum distance separation. The applicant contends that they will assist in way
finding as because of the difficult southbound visibility on Emerald Parkway. The
applicant is also proposing a directional sign along Innovation Drive indicating the
location of the entrance and the Schoedinger name. This sign also does not meet Code.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed uses are consistent with the Community Plan, compatible with the surrounding
development, have adequate services, and will create a needed service within the city. Staff will
continue to work with the applicant to create high quality architecture, signage, gateway
#reatments, and refine the overall character of the development at the final development plan
stage. Staff recommends approval of this preliminary development plan (rezoning) with eight
conditions.
Conditions:
1) That all plans be revised to eliminate the access point on Emerald Parkway;
2) That text be modified to include brick as a permitted building material;
3) That the text be revised to state that the asphalt shingles will be dimensional;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -January 5, 2006
Page 7 of 7
Bases:
4) That the applicant revise the architecture to create a high quality dramatic
architecture for the development;
5) That the applicant comply with our Stormwater Management Regulations and
Flood Control Ordinances;
6) That plans be revised to move the southeast pond out of the utility easement along
Emerald Parkway and that the larger northwest pond be moved out of the
floodway + 20 feet on the plans;
7) That the applicant comply with any requirements for contribution to signalization
or other intersections improvements as determined by the City Engineer, and
based on the traffic study; and
8} That the site comply with all applicable requirements of the traffic study, subject
to approval by the City Engineer.
1) The proposed project will provide a needed funeral service and additional high
quality office space within the City.
2) The proposed development plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Dublin Community Plan.
3) This preliminary development plan generally complies with the review criteria
outlined in Section 153.053 of the Zoning Code.
N --
;:_,; 05-1822 n
City of Dublin /~
r`! ~ Land use and Schoedinger Funeral Home Feet
Long Range Planning Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive o z5o 500
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
~ ~
~,~`',
~ ~.
t ~ ~. ~ _ _ ~ ~•..
'~ A o
I ~ ~`N-~ j, a ,
~ ~ s~~ j---:-
~-~ ~-
~ . ,; ~
~ `,:~`
~ -- . .
~~~ ,~ -_.
~~ / ` ~_
)r \ ~ ~.r+orowoAO..
„ ~~o~^'
~ .en~e,..u `a~,.
//~~ '\ ~ ,
~'
r 2\ 3a~/
i.!` ~ /
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
-a'
\ i
\ ~
.;,.~.
I ( (i; i I
1 ~ ~ 'I d
1
a j 1 ~ II
~ , f:l ; .
r ~ '.
1 I j f~r:~~ I
~ __ ... .... ._. I I iI r
;~, : I
~_ ryY ` ~ ,c-, ~ I I 1 ~ r ~ I
-.~~``~ L ~ 11 I: I
_ ~~ ,.. t.
.kl 1
-~~~lir I
.
i, 4 o- I
+..
\ `~ ~ f r ~\~ t ..1 I~I_s
\\\\\i~ \.~= - ! tAX ?rr Jj'l r, ~~` ..monaron' / 11~ Iii I ,
_ ~_
--___
.n.
.._____ _,t I
~ 1
y...` ~~ ..... ........... ..
<... .•~..~ - - _ _ ~ .. _...._ . ~ r
_.._
`''-....... ~ ; 1
\. ~, r sr
~~
1. J -.
05-1822
Schoedin~er Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
y5
no hw~~~~ation ;,;,s•,;;n,
'S.1"Lr+
east eicvatbn ~„~,,;,
1.~~
sout ~t elevation ,,,_~,,,;,
OS-1827
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PRGPGSED SIGNAGE
R _ 2 -~
( --. 2 -n,
s
o'-n° {
°II
as-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
Dous~E FACE ILLUMINATED MONUMENT$1~N SCALE: 3~8"=1,
CAB!\EC CUSTOM FABRICATED 18' DFEP ALUMG\YMA CA&NET FWiSHEO PMS 295 BLUE ANO VMITE
FACE: RCUTED ALUNFNUM BAC!(ED VATH T!B' VMITE PLEX.
IILUU'NAtION C.V/.H.O. FLUORESCENT IAMPS IS RE9U 7ED FOR PROPER ILLUUAWTICN.
NOUNUNG: 6' X .280' VlALL SIEEI POLE - 5' X 5' X 2'•b' CONCRETE FOOTER
POLE COVER: 18' X 30' ALUMLW~Td POLE COVER FINISHED PMS 295 BLUE
NOTF: ALE SIGNAGE i0 BE U.L. APPROVED AND tABEIED.
IHSTALEAYION OF SIGNAGE TO MEET N.E.C.600 REQUIREMENTS.
f
s
DOABLE FAC ON ILLUMINATED QIRECTi NA ICON SCALD,: 3/n"=1'
CABNIEI: CUSTOM fABRiCATEO 4' DEEP ALU3ANUM CABWET F W ISHED DURANOD:C BRONZE AND WFR1E
FACE: 1 /B' ALUMRv'lIM fAY{SHED ORONiE VfiH VhRTE REfLECTNf. COPY
MOUNTWG: 2.5' X .20T WAIL STEEL POIG
PROPC}SEQ TEXT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
SCHOEDiNGER FUNERAL SERVICES
innovation Drive /Emerald Parkway
Revised December 30, 2005
introduction
"l~he site is approximately 8.8~ acres and zoned Restricted Industrial ("RI"). It is located
northwest of the intersection of Innovation Drive and Emerald Parkway. The property is
intended for development in two subareas. Subarea A will consist of a funeral home, a
reception center, and a remembrance garden. Subarea B shall consist of suburban office
uses totaling 32,000 square feet. The proposed uses are appropriate for this location due
to the development patterns of adjacent properties and the proximity of State Routes 33
and 161 and the Interstate 270 freeway interchanges. Upon approval of this rezoning
application, the owner and/or applicant shall have five (5} years from the effective date of
this rezoning to have a final development plan approved.
Subarea A Funeral Home and Reception Center
A1.01 llescription and Acreage:
Subarea A is approximately 4.4t acres. Subarea A may contain a funeral
home, a reception center, and a remembrance garden.
A1.02 Permitted Uses:
Subarea A may contain the following uses: a funeral home; a reception center,
used in conjunction with the funeral home; and a remembrance garden- A
crematory shall not be permitted on site. The reception center may be used
for private receptions and by users including but not limited to: business
associations, professional membership organizations, labor organizations,
civic, social and fraternal associations, political organizations, charitable
organizations, and nonprofit membership organizations. The remembrance
garden will be located in the vicinity of the reception center and is designed to
be a passive park-like setting which may include a path and benches. A
remembrance garden shall conform to all licensing requirements and
municipal regulations.
A1.03 Permitted Density:
1. Two buildings shall be located in this subarea and total building coverage
shall be approximately 14,700 square feet. The funeral home shall be
approximately 11,700 square feet and the reception center shall >~ ~~ ~ ~ V E D
approximately 3,000 square feet. t~'~1~~
OS-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSEf~ TEXT
A1.04 Traffic and Circulation:
1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive as
approved by the city engineer.
2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary
Development Plan based on a traffic /access study and approval by the city
engineer. The Innovation Drive curb cuts shown on the Preliminary
Development Pian shall be full access. 'i'he curb cut locations may be
modif ed with the approval of the city engineer and may serve both subareas.
3. The westernmost curb cut on Innovation Drive shall be permitted as needed to
serve future land development to the west with the approval of the city
engineer.
A1.05 Parking and Loading:
1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance
with Dublin City Code.
A1.06 Setback Requirements:
1. Setbacks from Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for ail
pavement areas.
2. Building setbacks from Emerald Parkway and from Innovation Drive shall be
a minimum of 100 feet.
3. There shall be a zero parkingJpaving setback and a 20 foot building setback
from the property line dividing Subarea A and Subarea B.
4. The reception center shall be setback a minimum of SO feet from the north
property line.
5. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea A.
A1.07 Height Requirements:
The average height of structures shall be 38 feet above finished floor
elevation.
05-1822
2 Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSED TEXT
A1.08 Waste and Refuse:
I. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and screened from view by a solid
brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials.
A1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas:
1. No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on
any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. Mechanical
equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be
. screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building.
2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shall be enclosed or not visible from
the street or adjoining property.
3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shalt be screened from all streets or
adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination
thereof.
Ai.iO Landscaping:
Landscaping shall be in accordance with Dublin City Code. "The northern
environs of the proposed pond nearest the north property line shall assume a
naturalistic design direction. The intent is to tie this part of the site with the
stream corridor to the north making a seamless transition to the developed
site. The use of indigenous plant materials, including trees, shrubs and
perennials will constitute the plant pallet. On the southern edge of this
northern pond along with the pond at the intersection of Innovation Drive and
Emerald Parkway, ornamental trees grouped with flowering shrubs and
perennials will be arranged to create informal, causal planting beds. A lawn
will run to the edge of the pond where no planting beds are planned.
2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed and/or maintained along the
Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive frontage as depicted on the attached
Landscape Plan. The landscape buffer will be compatible with existing
developments and approved plans along Emerald Parkway.
3. Plant material when installed shall meet the following minimum size
requirements as follows:
a. Deciduous trees 2-inch caliper minimum
b. Evergreen trees G-foot height minimum
OS-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSEQ TEXT
c. Ornamental trees 1 ~/2 inch caliper minimum or 6-foot
height minimum
d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum
4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved
and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected
during construction with tree preservation snow fencing.
5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved.
Al.ll Architecture:
"Che architecture and color palette will be similar to the styles permitted by the
Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of
earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors in
brighter hues are permitted for building accent features only such as signage,
awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. and will be submitted with the final
development plan.
2. Building materials shall consist of:
a. Stone veneer or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone
detailing.
b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or asphalt shingles
with no Iess than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used.
c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar
materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer.
3. Roof:
a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope
equal to 6/ 12 or greater.
b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required.
c. Flat roofs are permitted provided they are proportionately integrated
with parapets that adequately screen mechanical rooftop equipment.
4. Scale:
a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the
landscape.
OS-1827.
Schoedinger Funeral Home
4 Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PRC~P4SEQ TEXT
b. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated
building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and
other architectura[ elements that help break up the building mass and
scale.
5. Wall ArticuiationlFenestration:
a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass,
individual watts must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or
structural expression equally on all sides of each structure.
b. ~i'he amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the
amount of solid facade.
A1.12 Signage and Graphics:
All signage shall use muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural
style of the building. Since Subarea A has frontage along two roadways, two
(2} monument signs and directional signage shall be permitted for the funeral
home. One (1) monument sign shall be located at the intersection of Emerald
Parkway and Innovation Drive and one (1) monument sign shall be located
along Emerald Parkway toward the northern edge of Subarea A. Directional
signage shall be located at the Innovation Drive entrance. Manufacturer
specification sheets shall be provided at the time of the Final Development
Plan.
Subarea B Office
B1.01 Description and Acreage:
1. Subarea B is approximately 4.4~ acres. Subarea B shalt be comprised of
suburban office type uses totaling 32,000 square feet. Tfie architectural style
shall be similar to the styles permitted by the Thomas / Kohler development
plan which is to the south of the site.
B1.02 Permitted Uses:
1. Subarea B shall include those uses listed in Dublin City Code Section
153.025, Suburban Office and Institutional District.
B1.03 Permitted Density:
1. The maximum permitted density shall be 32,000 square feet.
B1.04 Traffic and Circulation:
05-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSED TEXT
1. Ingress and egress to parcels shall be provided along Innovation Drive.
2. Curb cuts on Innovation Drive shall be as shown on the Preliminary
Development Plan. Said curb cuts shall be full access. The curb cut locations
may be modified with the approval of the city engineer.
3. The westernmost Innovation Drive access shall provide shared access to the
property to the west to accommodate future development of that tract.
4. The easternmost Innovation Drive access shall be shared between Subarea A
and Subarea B.
B1.05 Parking and Loading:
1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be in accordance
with the Dublin City Code.
B2.06 Setback Requirenn~ents:
1. Setbacks from Innovation Drive shall be 25 feet for alI pavement areas.
2. Building setbacks from Innovation Drive a minimum of I00 feet.
3. The minimum side yard shall be zero for parking and 20 feet for buildings at
the east property line and a 25 foot building setback and a shared access at the
west property tine.
4. Maximum lot coverage shall be 70% measured over the entirety of Subarea B.
B1.07 Height Requirements:
The average height of structures shall be 38 feet from the finished floor
elevation_
B1.08 Waste and Refuse:
1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and screened from view by a solid
brick wall, wood fence or materials consistent with the building materials.
B1.09 Storage and Equipment and Service Areas:
1. No materials, supplies, or equipment shall be stored or permitted to remain on
any portion of the parcel outside the permitted struchtre. Mechanical
equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be
screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building.
OS-1822
Schoedinger Funera] Home
6 Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PROPOSED TEXT
2. All refuse, trash, and garbage collection shalt be enclosed or not visible from
the street or adjoining property.
3. Service courts and loading docks, if any, shall be screened from ail streets or
adjacent properties by landscaping, mounding, or walls, or any combination
thereof.
B1.10 Landscaping:
[. Landscaping shall be similar to the approved Thomas / Kohler plan to the
south of the site in accordance with Uublin City Code and a plan wi[l be
submitted with the final development plan.
2. A 25-foot landscape buffer shall be installed along the Imnovation Drive
frontage as depicted on the attached Landscape Plan.
3. Plant material shall be installed with minimum size requirements as follows:
a. Deciduous trees
b. Evergreen trees
c. Ornamental trees
2-inch caliper minimum
6-foot height minimum
1 %2 inch caliper minimum or 6-foot
height minimum
d. Evergreen and deciduous shrubs 24-inch minimum
4. Healthy trees located within the 25-foot landscape buffer shall be preserved
and incorporated into proposed buffer planting. These trees shall be protected
during construction with tree preservation snow fencing.
5. As many existing trees as possible will be preserved.
Bl.ll Architecture:
"1'he architecture and color palette will be similar to the stykes permitted by the
Thomas / Kohler development plan to the south of the site and shall consist of
earthen tones, with a preference for muted and natural tones. Accent colors in
brighter hues are permitted for building accent features only such as signage,
awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. and will be submitted with the final
development plan.
2. Building materials shall consist of:
a. Stone veneer or stucco stone with limestone or simulated limestone
detailing.
OS-1822
~ Schoedinger I"uneral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
PRQPQ~ED TEXT
b. On pitched roofs, standing seams, cedar shakes, or asphalt shingles
with no less than 325 pounds per square weight shall be used.
c. Wood, engineered wood products, stucco, tile, and other similar
materials may be used as an accent with brick and/or stone veneer.
3. Roof:
a. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope
equal to 6/12 or greater-
b. Minimum 8" overhangs are required.
c. Flat roofs are permitted provided they are proportionately integrated
with parapets that adequately screen mechanical rooftop equipment.
4. Scale:
a. Structures should be designed to harmonize with each other and the
landscape.
b. The scale of each building can be aided through the use of articulated
building elements, such as porticoes, dormers, recesses, awnings and
other architectural elements that help break up the building mass and
scale.
5. Wall Articulation/Fenestration:
a. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass,
individual walls must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or
structural expression equally on all sides of each structure.
b. The amount of fenestration should be aesthetically balanced with the
amount of solid facade.
B1.12 Signage and Graphics:
1. All Signage shall be muted colors and shall coordinate with the architectural
style of the buildings. Manufacturer specification sheets shat[ be provided at
the time of the final development plan.
F:Docslschoedinger.txt (12/30/OS-dlh) (5} word
05-1822
g Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes ~f___ ___ _____~ _ Dublin City Council
DAYTW CEUK tlCAIX.INC..fUt1MN0 ~O~Y __
ir___..
-- ~ ---i~iovember~t~ 2ff05 -__ _.______
,Meeting., __.___ .__
of cardi that exists toda . If the middle ti program desire something diffe nt from
this, the would have tog to the respectiv parties and an endment to the
agreern nts could be pro ased.
Mr. Mc ash inquired ifs a is stating that tt ese agreements ould have to be amended if
a futur MTO wants to d something differ nt.
Ms. S ay stated that th re would be thre years in which f determine that. he MTO
down' yet exist.
Mrs. ring stated that i the problem wit this agreement. The MTO down yet exist,
yet th y are being limit without particip ling in a discuss' n.
Ms. S lay responded t at the people wh understand the omplexities of th soccer world
have ndicated the ayr ements are satisf dory. Mr. Clint n, who is an adv cafe for the
midd tier program, h s so indicated.
Mrs. oring responde that Mr. Clinton fated that a com romise was nee ssary to
achi ve agreement.
May r Chinnici-Zuerc er inquired if Mr. cCash would li a to propose a lion.
Mr. cCash respond d that a signitica t amount of time as spent on thi discussion 18
months ago. He is s rprised that it too an extended pe iod of time to pr uce these
agr ements. He mo ed that the third nd fourth senten es of Article 4 re arding the
Mi dle Tier Program on page 5 of 8 b struck from the greement. That ould not limit
th City in any way.
Mrs. Boring second d the motion.
V ate on the motion: Mr. Keenan, no; r. Reiner, no; ayor Chinnici-Zu rcher, no; Mr.
M Cash, yes; Mr. L cklider, no; Ms. slay, no; Mrs. B ring, yes.
t
ayor Chinnici-Zu rcher reiterated t e other changes that Council me bers have agree
~pon: (1) to Artid 7, page two, ad "coaches" to #2; (2} in Article 7, a d the language
tat Mr_ Ortiz sug eaed could be o rained by the La Director's office (3) remove the
uplication of the ord "program'; ( } in Article 4, se nd line from bo om, delete the
duplication of the ord, "programs; (5) in the same rticle, replace th word "against" ith
rn con}unction wi h..."
t Mayor Chinnici- ,ercher called th vote on the pro osed amendmen s to Resolution 7 -
' { 05.
1 Vote on the am ndments: Mrs. B ring, yes; Mr. K enan, yes; Mr. R iner, yes; Mayor
Chinnici-Zuerch r, yes; Mr. McC h, yes; Mr. Leek ider, yes; Ms. S ay, yes.
Mayor Chinnic~Zuercher called t e vote on the pr posed amendm nts to Resolutionl79-
~ a5.
I ~ Vote on the a endments: Mr. einer, yes; Ms. S lay, yes; Mayor hinnici-Zue
;' Mr. Keenan, y s; Mrs. Boring, y s; Mr. Lecklider, es; Mr. McCash yes.
v
Mayor Chinni i-Zuercher calte the vote on Res lution 78-05 as a ended.
; Vote an the esolution: Mr. K enan, yes; Mr. R iner, yes; Ms. S lay, yes; Mr.
na; Mrs. Bori g, yes; Mayor C innici-Zuercher, es; Mr. Lecklider yes.
Mayor Chin ci- Zuercher calf d the vote on th Resolution 79-0 as amended.
Vote on the esolution: Ms. alay, yes; Mr. M Cash, no; Mrs. ring, yes; Ma
Chinnici-Zu rcher, yes; Mr. L cklider, yes; Mr. eenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
yes;
Resolutio 80-05
Appointin a Member to t e Architectural eview Board o the City of Dub in.
Mr. McCa ,Administrative Committee Chair introduced the r solution. He not d that
Gouncil h s interviewed ca didates to replac Richard Taylor, who resigned tr the
Board. T e recommended andidate is Willi m Souders to fil the unexpired to m of
Richard ylor. He asked he Clerk to corre t the Language i the resolution t substitute
"appoint "for "reappoint
Vote on e Resolution: . Salay, yes; Mr Lecklider, yes; r. McCash, yes; rs. Boring,
%~.
yes; Ma r Chrnmci-Zuer er, yes, Mr. Rer er, yes, Mr. Kee an, yes. !I
OTHER j
• Concept Plan -Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and Innovation ii
Drive
OS-1822
Schoedinger runeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation T)rive
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dublin City Council
-----..-------.Minutes_of ---------------------•--•-- -------------.-....__-•--- ---------------------•-------------f`-'Ieetmg__-
- fir.. _._-_
--------hfovemt~er~Y;~OOg-------_..._..__....._------ ..-.f~age-1.?-------
~~
H
Ms. Wanner stated that this is a concept for a funeral home located at Emerald Parkway
and Innovation Drive. On October 6, Planning Commission reviewed the plan. The main
issues of discussion were the traffic impacts for the proposed uses on the road network
and the applicant's request for a right in, right out access along Emerald Parkway. The
applicant is seeking feedback from Council regarding the concept plan.
She displayed aerials of the site. The site consists of 8.8 acres and some industrial uses
surround the north half of the site. There are some vacant parcels to the south and to the
east of the site. The northern portion includes a stream and some riparian vegetation.
The site is zoned Restricted Industrial, as are surrounding sites to the north and south.
There is a portion of land across Emerald Parkway that is zoned Planned Commercial
District. The site plan includes 11,1)00 square feet of building, including a funeral home
that is turned toward the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation and an
associated reception center for use after funerals. There are also some office buildings
shown to the west of the proposal, including four one-story buildings and one two-story
building, for a total of 32,000 square feet of office area. The applicant has requested a
right in, right out curb cut along Emerald Parkway. The City Engineer is reluctant to allow
that curb cut, as the Emerald Parkway plans did not include that cut.
Other comments at Planning Commission related to the density of the office subarea.
Staff will be looking to cap this density somewhere close to 9,000 square feet per acre,
consistent with other office developments in the City.
She noted that staff has directed the applicant to pursue an access study in conjunction
with the traffic study.
Staff has encouraged the applicant to review the design of the office area as well as the
density, and continue moving forward with the rezoning. The applicant is seeking
comments and feedback from Council at this time.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked Ms. Wanner to identify the approximate location of the
curb cut on the slide shown and asked about the distance of the curb cut from Innovation
Drive.
Ms. Wanner stated that the curb cut is 240 feet from Innovation Drive.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked it staff is requesting that the applicant decrease the
density.
Ms. Wanner responded that staff has not requested that of the applicant ai this time. Staff
is seeking feedback from Council on the land use issue of a funeral home in this location
and the curb cut locations.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher commented that she is pleased that the City of Dublin wilt finally
have a funeral home in the community. Et has been needed for a long time and this is a
good location for one. She suggests that Council seriously consider allowing a right in,
right out from Emerald for reasons of access and because those coming from out of town
could more easily find She funeral home. She does not have a concern with a curbcut at
this location. She is intrigued with the concept of a reception center. Do these exist at
other locations in the area?
Randy Schoedinger, Schoedinger Funeral Home stated that there is not another area
location with this type of facility. They have observed a trend toward less traditional
services, with families requesting a variety of celebration of life services and gatherings.
This provides a separate facility for such a gathering. It could also be used for those
having a traditional funeral to have a space for a dinner immediately adjacent. It could
also be offered free of charge to community groups for meeting space at times the space
is not scheduled for the business.
Mr. Reiner asked if a kitchen would be included.
Mr. Schoedinger responded that it would have a kitchen area suitable for caterers to use,
but not fuEl cooking facilities.
i Mr. Keenan asked if liquor permits would be required for this facility.
~ Mr. Schoedinger responded tha! caterers would secure such permits when using the
t facilities.
II Mr. Reiner stated that the City does need a funeral home, and this is an excellent location ;'
!I for one. The proposaE has a very interesting layout.
I
~; Mr. Schoedinger stated that it is very vital to them to have good access and that the
ii OS-1822
I, Schoedinger T'uneral Home
~i Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
publin City Councl Meetin
_ ____Minutes ~_f_~_.__.._._._.-.~ ------- -
funeral home be easy to locate. Most of their clientele is elderly. In terms of exiting, it !
would be difficult to exit funeral processions by looping around the back of the building '
onto Innovation Drive and then turning again. The additional turns involved extend the
width of the procession, backing up Emerald Parkway even more. 4
i
Mr. Reiner noted that it appears that there is adequate parking on the site.
Mr. Schoedinger responded that there are 180 spaces planned and this wilt generally I
meet their needs for all but an unusually large funeral service, lit
Mr. Keenan noted that Ms. Wanner addressed the office uses and he recalls that the
Planning Commission discussion related to reducing the density. {,
Ms. Wanner responded that the Commission wanted to cap the density at approximately j
9,000 square feet per acre. What is currently shown on the plan is around 10,000 square '
feet per acre.
Mr. Keenan asked if the 180 parking spaces are for the funeral home only. ~~
Mr. Schoedinger responded that this is correct. ti
Mr. Keenan noted that the Commission noted that a site just to the south is also zoned for ~k
a funeral home and will soon be a subject of discussion. At the Commission meeting. Mr.
Schoedinger responded to a question about having two funeral homes in close proximity. I
Mr. Keenan asked that he share those comments with Council. I
Mr. Schoedinger stated that the other applicant is Tidd Funeral Home, and as far as he
knows, that project is presently on hold. They do not believe it is a negative to gave two
funeral homes in a community of this size. In other areas of Central Ohio, there are ij
funeral homes adjacent to one another. Essentially, it will offer a choice to the consumer. (I
Ms. Salay stated that it is noF negative to have two funeral homes, but for a resident of this
area, it is a negative to have two funeral homes in such close proximity to their homes.
The site to the south on the Thomas Kohler development that is presently in contract with
Tidd Funeral Home was the subject of negotiation in 1995 with the neighborhood. A big
concession from the neighborhood's perspective was to allow the use of a funeral home.
In the case of the funeral home to the south, it is a conditional use. The conditions involve
the proximity to the park and the homes, and given the fact that it meets the conditions, it I~
will likely be considered a permitted use given Council's recent discussions about
conditional uses. The neighborhood's concern is with having a permitted funeral home in I
such close proximity. While it is something needed in Dublin, the neighborhood does not ~~
support having two in such close proximity. She could therefore not support this use in
this location unless the funeral home use on the Thomas Kohler site is eliminated in some
way. She is not certain how that could be done other than this applicant working out
something with the developer of the Thomas Kohler site. This is simply the wrong location
in her view. ~:
Mr. Schoedinger asked for clarification - is this because she believes the funeral home is ~~
a less attractive use than office? ~~
Ms. Salay responded that the business is not a pleasant use and ii is not desirable to I
have two funeral homes in such close proximity !o the neighborhood. The neighborhoods
have asked her to carry this message to Council. ~
it
Mr_ Lecklider asked about the specific location of the other conditional use to the south. '~
Ms. Wanner identified the location on the map. A funeral home is allowed as a condition ~
{'
use on that site. It has frontage along Emerald Parkway.
Mr. Reiner asked if that is the area with a forest behind it.
Ms. Saiay responded chat the forest is actua-ly Heather Gien Park. j~
i;
Mr. Lecklider stated that he has some mixed feelings about this. He understands from a
business perspective the reasons the applicant would favor this site, in view of its visibility. i;
What has occurred to him tonight is a question of whether this is the highest and best use `J
for the site. This is his only reservation, given Council's responsibility to rezone. Perhaps
the City could in fact generate a great deaf more revenue ii it were an office building. ~~
i
Mrs. Boring stated that she has concerns about Council Members comments about what
might develop on another site in the future. Even though the Thomas Kohler property is 11
OS-1827
Schoedinger Funeral Home
llmerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dubbn City Council Meetng_-
-- November2Y;2005-~---_~-~""~--_.____.__~ge_~9_~.
zoned, it does not mean that the funeral home will be built on that site. She believes that
the proposal before Council tonight is a fabulous development of a site located adjacent to
a substation. She cannot imagine a better proposal for this site. She likes the reception
area proposed. Council should look positively on the natural experience of death. This
will be a nice neighbor for the adjacent substation.
Mr- Schoedinger provided some history of the process. They contacted the City two years
ago for assistance in identifying appropriate locations for a funeral home, and this was
one of the five sites identified by the City. From the standpoint of being a good neighbor,
homeowners in other communities have cited the same concerns about a proposed
funeral home. It is quickly realized that having an office use adjacent with heavy traffic at
rush hour is much less desirable than a funeral home with traffic at oft hours and which
offers a reception center that can be used by the community. They would love to be part
of the Dublin community.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher thanked Mr. Schoedinger, and noted that Council looks forward
to working with him.
• oncept Plan - ntry Greene - 9 6 Hyland-Croy ad ,I
Ms. W nner stated that is concept plan ncludes 189.57 a res with a varlet of (l
reside tial uses, a villa retail area and 6.6. acres of ope space. It was r viewed by jj
Planni g & Zoning Co fission on Octo r 6, 2005 and is ues of concern i hided the ~
inters ty of use and de gn of the propos d village area, a well as the 200-f of setback
along Hyland-Croy Ro and McKitrick aad. The applic t is seeking tee ack on the i
cone pt plan prior top rsuing a rezonin .The site is laca ed in the narthw si area of j
Dubli' and includes se erat parcels that ere recently an exed. She revie ed the aerial !
of th site. The site is oned R, Rural D strict and surrou ding parcels in tf City are also
zon ' Rural, the Tart West develop~~ent to the south i zoned PUD, an the other II
pare Is are outside of he City. As regyfred by the conse ation design re lution, the
appl cant has submits d maps that addrr~ess the four cons rvation designs ps. She ~
dis aged and explai d the maps. Ba ed on the existin. landscape teat res and ii
pro isions of conserv lion design, the pplicant has ere led a proposed s to plan which i~
incl des 60 estate to to the north, 70 carriage lots and illage lots in the enter of the
sit and 78 town ho es to the west. village retail ar is shown in the outhwest area
at a corner of Hyla d-Croy and McK trick Roads. The e are six access points on the '•
pl ~- two along Hyl nd-Croy, two al ng Jerome, one long Brock Road and one along II
M itrick. The plan includes 50 perc nt open space w h bikepaths and rails that
su rounding existin and proposed p nds. A 4.6-acre entral park is to led toward the it
c ter of the site w ere carriage ho es front the site. he proposed lol plans shows the ~
th ee distinct single family areas: th northern portion are the estate lot ,carriage lots l•
h ve alleys and re r access and are located to the ce ter; to the west i the town home i~
s barea. She revs wed some cone ptual elevations f r the three area .The applicant I`i
s submitted a re iced site plan, b sed on input fro the Planning C mission on thei it
i itial concept pla .They are seeks g feedback from Council. ~
he highlighted th changes: som lots have been oved to accom date an existin
ee stand; a lot w s eliminated to Ilow a better vie shed and bikep h access. In an ,I
rea perceived to have too much o a grid-tike patte ,and the appli nt has modified 1 e
Ian to create m e open space, oving the lots to a south and ere ring an addition
ear access alley still adhering to he 200-foot setb ck. 11
Much of the disc ssion at Plannin Commission rel fed to the villag retail area. The
have revised so a of the plans in this area as welt. Anew conceptu I retail site plan as i
included in the uncil packet. T is area has been further develope ,based on ~I
comments recei ed. Staff felt th the retail and re idential areas w re too segregate ij
and should be ore blended, an so the applicant has created a vil ge green portio that II
is punctuated b smaller park sp ces as well as a ock/pond featur accessible to u ers ~~
of the retail ce er and to those I ing in the resid fiat area. With t is plan, the appl ant I!
has taken the lion of the histo is four corners b ck concept and ecreased the s back ;I
along Hyland- roy and McKitric Roads for the r tail portion only. he applicant w Id '
like to speak t the concepts to fight. I'i
She showed s me conceptual tail elevations w ich were shown o the Commissi n.
Staff and the ommission fell t ey lacked villag character, ands the applicant p vided ~i
a revised elev lion which divid s the masses of he elevations an addr
setting to exp nd the village n lion.
05-1822
Schoedinger Fuueraj Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Thrive
CITY OF DUBLiN-
land Use and
Lang Range Planning
5900 shier-Rings Road
Dublin, t3hio 4301b•1236
Phone: b14-410.4600
Fez: bE4-410-4141
Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
OCTOBER 6, 2045
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
6. Concept Plan - OS-ISSCP - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway anti
Innovation Drive
Location: 8.8 acres located on the west side of Emerald Parkway, at the intersection of
Innovation Drive.
Existing Zoning: RI, Restricted Industrial District.
Request: Review and feedback for a Concept Plan under the provisions of Code Section
153.053(C).
Proposed Use: A funeral home and office development.
Applicant: Applied Innovation, 5800 Innovation Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016;
represented by Nick Cavaleris, Smith and Hate, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725,
Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Jamie E. Adkins, Planner.
Contact Information: {614) 410-464/Email: jadkins@dublin.oh.us.
RESULT: The Concept Plan was positively received by the Commission. Issues discussed
regazded the use of the reception center, traffic, access, buffering. and setbacks from the stream
corridor. No vote or action was taken.
STAFF CERTIFICATION
~' ,~ ~-,
Jamie E: Adkins
Planner
os-2szZ
Schoedinger Funeral Ilome
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -October 6, 2005
Page 4
Mr. Gerb r moved for pproval oft s Rezoning cause it wil continue the preservation f the
Historic istrict chara er and will f cilitate future growth, wit one conditio
1 } That he applicant pplies for al necessary b lding and zo ing permits rior to const ction
of y approved s' a modifieati s.
Mr. Zi merman sec nded the mot on, and the v to was as fo ows: Ms. R iss, yes; Ms. oring,
yes; .Janes, yes Mr. Saneho tz, yes; Mr. essineo, y ; Mr. Zi rman, yes; d Mr.
Gerbe yes. (Appro ed 7-0.)
5. zoning - OS 42Z -Platt um Manage ent - 8? So th High Str et
Mr. erber swore ' those who i tended to tes 'fy in regard to this case.
Dav d Goldthwait , representin the applican ,Peter Corat la, Platinum Managemen agreed to
the ne condition n the staff re ort as listed low.
Mr Gerber mov for approv of this Rezo ing because ' will contin the preserv ion of the
Hi toric District haracter and acilitate fu e growth, wi one conditi n:
1) That the a licant appli s for all n essary buil ing permits prior to de olition and
constructio of any appro ed site modi cations.
r. Zimmerm seconded t emotion, an the vote was as follows: s. Reiss, ye ; Ms. Boring,
s; Ms. Jone ,yes; Mr. S neholtz, yes Mr. Messin o, yes; Mr. immerman, yes; and Mr.
erber, yes. ( pproved 7-0 )
6. Concept PIan - OS-155CP - Schoedinger Funeral Home -Emerald Parkway and
Innovation Drive
Mr. Gerber explained that this is an application. for review and approval of a Concept Plan for a
43,000-square-foot funeral home and office buildings on an 8.8-acre site. He said the Concept
Plan review examines the general design of the proposed development and this is anon-specific
review and the results are not binding on either the developer or the municipality. The
Commission is to provide feedback and then submit the application to City Council for its
review. He said if approved, the applicant is authorized to file a preliminary development plan
or rezoning, whichever is applicable within the next eight months. At a later date, City Council
will schedule a public hearing and subsequently vote to approve or disapprove the proposal. All
development plans will require approval by the Commission prior to construction.
Jamie Adkins highlighted the staff report and presented slides of the site. She said the proposed
site includes a funeral home building at the corner of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive. In
association with this use, is a reception center at the back portion of the site. She said one and
two-story office buildings are shown on the western portion of the site.
Ms. Adkins said a substantial creek exists along the north side of the property with associated
floodplain and floodway and, if the applicant proceeds, work cannot be done within this
floodway plus 20 feet. If work is done within the 100-year floodplain, a hydraulic study will be
necessary to indicate that they have compensating storage.
OS-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -October 6, 2005 .
Page 5
Ms. Adkins said staff supports this Concept Plan, believes the uses are generally consistent with
the development in the area, have adequate services, and will create a needed service within the
City. She said staff will continue to work with the applicant through the rezoning process to
refine the uses, architecture, signage, etc. Staff also believes that the Concept Plan is consistent
with the Community Plan.
Nick Cavaleris, attorney representing the applicant, added that the site was divided into two
subareas for the funeral home and office uses. He said an electrical substation exists to the north
and the applicant feels it is screened adequately from this use. '
Randy Schoedinger, Schoedinger Funeral Service, said they feel this is a needed service in
Dublin. He described his 150-year-old company.
Mr. Gerber explained that there will be ample opportunity later for those wishing to speak
regarding this proposed development at Commission and Council hearings if this project
continues forward.
Mr. Zimmerman noted that to the south of this site is the Thomas-Kohler PCD, and the text
allows the use of a funeral home. He had heard that an application had been received from the
Tidd Funeral Home in that area.
Ms. Adkins confirmed that an application of a Tidd Funeral Home had been received. She added
that a funeral home in the Thomas-Kohler text was considered a Conditional Use.
There was a discussion about the close proximity of the two funeral homes, and it was concluded
that it was not uncommon to have funeral homes located close to each other.
Mr. Gerber asked what "Existing Non-Residential" meant in the Community Plan.
Ms. Adkins replied that when the 1997 Land Use Map was created, this site was already zoned
RI, Restricted Industrial, therefore the future land use shown was "Existing Non-Residential."
Mr. Zimmerman inquired about the Schoedinger crematory.
Mr. Schoedinger clarified that all of the cremation and embalming operations are completed at
their downtown facilities.
Ms. Boring asked what the density of the office buildings was.
Ms. Adkins replied that the entire site density was just less than 5,000 square feet per acre. She
said the office area density had not been calculated.
Ms. Reiss asked what the overall Thomas-Kohler density was.
Ms. Adkins was unable to cite this density.
Ms. Boring asked about the detached reception area.
as-razz
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -October 6, 2005
Page 5
Mr. Schoedinger explained that their industry was moving away from traditional funeral
services, and more to a celebration of lives. He said memorial services are more prevalent, and
people are finding the need to have more of a gathering with refreshments. He said the reception
center would be offered free for daytime use of community groups during their off hours.
Ms. Boring said it was important that the bikepaths connect to this site.
Ms. Boring was concerned that thexe were too many separate, small offices in the concept. She
thought it looked too cluttered on the layout.
Greg Krobot, The Edge Group, explained that the footprints shown were the same as the office
buildings to the south. He said they were used as a model to study what other land uses might be
available. He said Schoedinger does not need the entire 8.8 acres.
Ms. Boring said this was a very attractive use next to the substation. She added that this is a very
necessary service to the community and she looked forward to having it in Dublin.
Mr. Saneholtz referred to page two of the site layout where it included an 11,000-square-foot
funeral home building and reception center, combined. He noted that the City Engineer was not
inclined to allow the curb cut on Emerald Parkway. 1-le encouraged the applicant to consider
eliminating the Emerald Parkway curb cut.
Mr. Saneholtz asked about the traffic flow of the funeral processions.
Mr. Schoedinger said the routes to the cemeteries have not been mapped out, but he thought the
majority of the time, Emerald Parkway would be used. He said funeral traffic occurred at times
other than rush hour, typically at 10 a.m. and 1 p.m., with calling hours in the afternoon or after
rush hour.
Mr. Saneholtz requested comments from staff on the anticipated impact upon Dublin's road
system, if any, with respect to the funeral home, especially since two are being discussed.
Ms. Adkins replied that a traffic study will be required at the rezoning, and it will take into
account the surrounding uses.
Mr. Gerber said he was also concerned as it related to traffic issues for the office uses
distinguished from those of the funeral home.
Mr. Saneholtz suggested that a buffer be considered between the parking lots for the office
buildings and the funeral home.
Mr. Gerber asked if the residents had been contacted.
Mr. Schoedinger indicated they had not since this was only a Concept Plan.
Mr. Gerber told him that they should contact the residents prior to coming back to the
Commission for review and approval.
OS-1$2Z
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -October 6, 2005
Page 7
Mr. Schoedinger said since the fiuteral home parking lot is not often full, it provides extra
parking for the offices.
Mr. Saneholtz said overall, this seemed like a very good location for the use.
Ms. Jones said this was a service that the community needed.
Ms. Reiss expected the off ce use would contribute to the rush hour traffic congestion at the
intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive, and suggested staff consider
signalization.
Mr. Gerber agreed and said blocking of the intersection should be avoided so there is not
neighborhood cut-through traffic.
Ms. Reiss asked if the reception center would be available for non-funeral related parties.
Mr. Schoedinger said while it would not be the primary purpose, the reception center could
definitely be encouraged for small parties.
Ms. Reiss asked if there would be on-site food service.
Mr. Schoedinger said there would be refrigeration and a sink for caterers to use, but not a full
kitchen.
Ms. Reiss requested ample setbacks from the stream for pavement and during construction so
that the water quality would be protected.
Mr. Saneholtz said music and other limitations may need to be placed on the reception area use.
Mr. Zimmerman understood the staff position on the Emerald Parkway curb cut, but he
suggested it might be better for the funeral home processions because there is going to be night-
in/rigbt-out at the median there. He said that it was better to exit at Emerald Parkway than it was
to go to Innovation Drive and block the intersection. He requested that staff consider it.
Mr. Schoedinger agreed that would work better for them.
Mr. Gerber was concerned about the number of office buildings as it related to density and the
impact on the local neighborhoods as it related to the traff c in their area. He suggested removal
of a building might be considered.
Ms. Boring asked if there was any time that Emerald Parkway was at a C level for traffic.
Barb Cox said Emerald Parkway was designed for that capacity. She said a bottleneck is
experienced because when it changes into the Columbus jurisdiction, it does not have as many
lanes. She said there are still improvements along Tuttle that need to happen and it is all
interconnected. She said the possible impact of this project to the west has been discussed with
the applicant and will be worked through.
05-1822
Schoedinger Funeral Home
Emerald Parkway & Innovation Drive