114-97 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
1lwvton Leeal Blacilc Co.
Form No. 30043
114-97
- - --
Passed -- --- -- -- -- - - -- --- - - -19
Ordinance No.___________----__-_--
AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE 1998-2002 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Section 8.03 (a) of the Dublin City Charter requires the City Manager to
prepare and submit to Ciry Council afive-year capital program in accordance with the
annual budget calendar as authorized by City Council; and
WHEREAS, City Council has received and reviewed the Five-Year Capital Improvements
Program (CIP) for the years 1998-2002; and
WHEREAS, the CIP represents a long-term financial plan which establishes priorities,
identifies project costs and phasing, identifies funding sources and serves as a planning
document for capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Administration has incorporated in the attached CIP all modifications as
requested by City Council as a result of the CIP budget workshops.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, ~_ elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the 1998-2002 Five-Year Capital Improvements Program attached as an
Exhibit be, and hereby is, approved.
Section 2. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the earliest date
permitted by law.
Passed this ~ day of -~ ~ i eh'L b-C/ , 1997
-Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
Clerk of Council
07/08/96
T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
f hereby certify that cop{es of this Ordnance/
City of Dubiin in accordance with Section 731.25 o~~f th Q~otp ~{~c~i~~~
~ss ~ Clerk o Co cil, D in, Obir
CITY OF DUBLIN ~ ~ ~ O
Director of Finance
5200 Emerald Parkway
Dublin, Ohio 43017-1006
Phone: 614-761-6500
Fax: 614-889-0740
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Timothy C. Hansley, City Manager
Date: August 1, 1997
Re: Ordinance No. 114-97, An Ordinance To Adopt The 1998-2002 Five-Year Capital
Improvements Program
Initiated by: Marsha I. Grigsby, Director of Finance ~
Ordinance No. 114-97 provides for the adoption of th blp hearinlvand adopt on on Sept tuber 3,
Program (CIP). The Ordinance is scheduled for a pu g
1997.
The modifications to the proposed CIP requested by City Council as a result of the CIP workshops
have been incorporated. The modifications are as follows:
- Dublin Road bikeway -the design will include tunn~esd at Memorial Drive and Brandonway
Drive. Additional funding, if needed, will be q
Parks and Recreation
u~„maior Proiects
Mai or Proiects
- Northeast Quad Park - programmed an additional $250,000 in funding for the years 2000 and
2001.
Transportation
Noivnaior Proiects
- Signalization -Brand Road/Dublin Road -funding in the amount of $500,000 has been
adjusted from 1998 to 1999.
~_.~_
Memorandum
Page Two
August 1, 1997
- Signalization - Muirfield Drive/Post Road -funding forasaresult of a recent City Count 1 a t on
A temporary signal will be installed in the near future
and will remain in place until the Avery Road/Shiee to be evaluat d for the posspbility of a
project is completed. The intersection will contlnu
permanent signal.
- Signalization -Riverside Drive/Summitview Road - ~nevego oertslsin 997 with installation
from 2000 to 1998. Design will be completed by a d p ~ )
programmed for 1998. Due to modifications to the design work being requested by the City,
the City will fund a small portion of the design costs.
crnrmwater System
ATnnmainr PTOIeCtS
- Stormwater improvements -funding was increased from 99 00 000,120018 and 200200 The
funding in the amount of $100,000 was added In 19 ,
improvements will be completed based on the review and evaluation of the Stonnwater Master
Plan that will be finalized in December 1997.
Please do not hesitate to contact Tim, Rich, Marsha, or Michelle if you have any questions or need
any additional information.
T:\PER\DKP\97\ 121-7-MG. W PD
~.~.
~„
~ I•
APITA
C
ENTS
OVEM
IMPR
RAM
PROG
_ pp2
98 2
19
~,
'~ Adopted: September, 1997 CITY OF DUBLIN
Capital Budget Process
1
Financial Guidelines
2
~.
~.
~.
~.
,.
..3... '~
Revenue Projections
3
Major Projects
.I
~~
Voted Debt Authority
Municipal Debt
,~
~.
~.
Non-Major Project Funding
7
G
59A60
"" ~ OneStep®
INDE%SVSTEM
~IF
~,
n
~,
~.
~r
CITY OF DUBLIN
1998 - 2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Section 6
Section 7
Table of Contents
Capital Budget Process
Financial Guidelines
Revenue Projections
Major Projects
Voted Debt Authority
Municipal Debt
Non-Major Project Funding
08/11 /97
T:\per\dkp\98-cip\2002
+e. ~,
,,:
1998 - 2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET PROCESS
The City of Dublin has implemented an annual schedule for the preparation and adoption of the Five-Year
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and the Operating Budget, which includes the annual capital budget.
The following time frames are key elements in the annual budget calendar:
January City Council goal setting session(s)
End of March Adoption of goals by City Council
End of June Completion of the Administration's recommended
Five-Year CIP
July/August City Council review of recommended CIP
End of October Completion of the Administration's recommended
Operating Budget
November City Council review of recommended Operating Budget
By December 31 Adoption of Operating Budget and Appropriations
Ordinances by City Council
The Five-Year CIP and the Operating Budget are two critical documents prepared annually. The relationship
between these two documents is summarized by the following points:
Five-Year CIP
• Provides a process for planning and budgeting for capital needs.
• Represents along-term financial plan, including funding sources.
• Establishes priorities and serves as a planning document or blueprint for the City's investment in
capital infrastructure.
• Provides a breakdown of major project costs and phasing.
• Does not appropriate money.
08/ 11 /97
t:\per\dkp\98-cip\2002
1-1
Operating Budget -Annual Capital Budget
Appropriates money to implement the first year of the Five-Year CIP.
Appropriates money to implement a "phase of a major, multi-year project".
Appropriates money for non-major capital expenditures, including those of a continuing nature (i.e.
fleet and equipment management, computers).
As indicated by the above points, the Operating Budget is the document which authorizes the actual funding
for the major and non-major capital projects.
08/11/97
t:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
1-2
w
^r
-:wr
^.
+wr-'
~,""``
~,-
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
The Five-Year CIP establishes the City's blueprint for investments in its capital infrastructure. This
document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City's long and short-term capital investments are
made in the context of careful consideration of the City's needs as well as the resources available to
fund all projects.
The financial guidelines used in the preparation of the CIP will provide assurance that the City can
meet, in a full and timely manner, both our debt service obligations and all the other obligations
competing for the available resources. It is our objective to complete as many needed capital
'~" improvement projects as financially possible while maintaining flexibility and the ability to adapt
,,~, to changes as they occur.
°`~ There are several key guidelines which the administration utilized in determining the City's fiscal
~~ capacity to complete capital projects over the next five years. These are summarized as follows:
25 percent of the City's 2 percent income tax revenue shall be made available to fund
~. .capital improvements. This allocation is in accordance with Ordinance No. 17-87
and the ballot language approved by the voters in November 1987.
^*~ Of the 25 percent of the total income tax revenues which are utilized for capital
~„ improvements, 60 percent of that amount will be allocated to fund long-term debt,
and 40 percent to fund projects and capital expenses on a cash basis. The reasons for
~"' this guideline are:
a) It is important to stress that funding projects with long-term debt obligates
`~" the use of public funds for the next 20 years in most cases. The more long-
term debt which is incurred now significantly reduces the options available
to future City Councils to fund needed projects.
b) The City has determined that paying cash for projects where financially
possible (pay-as-you-go financing) will increase our flexibility in the future.
In utilizing pay-as-you-go financing, revenue projections and estimated fund
balances will be reviewed and evaluated to assure that sufficient reserves are
maintained.
c) It is not economical to issue debt for some projects.
d) The estimated life of some projects does not meet the criteria to issue long-
term debt.
~"' Income tax revenue projections will be conservative. We are projecting a rate of
~„ growth in income tax revenue as follows:
1997 -9.5% 2000 - 4%
"'"' 1998 - 6% 2001 - 2%
1999 - 4% 2001 -2%
osn ti9~ ~-1
t:~~,~r\dt;p\9R-c ip\7.nn2
Our projections may appear to be conservative in light of previous trends; however,
these projections are being used to determine the amount of long-term debt that can
be retired using income tax revenues. To incur substantial long-term debt based upon
a high rate of growth could result in a serious financial strain on the City if those
growth projections are not achieved. Issuing long-term debt, in most cases, will
result in debt service payments over a 20 year period. Issuing long-term debt based
on less than conservative growth estimates would not be a financially sound
approach.
• To the degree that the income tax revenue rate of growth exceeds our projections in
any given year, the excess revenue should be utilized to fund projects on a cash basis 'r"
the following year. Again, it would not be fiscally prudent to incur long-term debt
based upon sporadic peaks and valleys which might occur in income tax growth in ~
future years.
• A minimum of 15 percent of the estimated revenue in the General Fund and the
Capital Improvements Tax Fund will be maintained as reserves. The availability of
adequate financial reserves or balances that can be used to address unforeseen
contingencies is a critical element in evaluating financial strength.
• A significant portion of the projects included in the CIP will be paid for using cash ~
reserves. Because of the extensive transportation needs, the City will commit at least
50 percent of identified available reserves for transportation improvements.
• Since a significant amount of the needed capital improvements now, and in the
future, are utility (water and sewer) related, the systems' user fees and capacity
charges (tap permits) will continue to be evaluated. Water related improvements will
be programmed based on the Water Fund's available cash reserves and estimated
annual revenues. The needed sewer system improvement, the construction of the
Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor, will continue to require a subsidy from
income tax revenues because of the magnitude of the project. Every effort will be
made to structure the debt service obligations in such a manner as to utilize the Sewer
Fund available cash reserves and estimated annual revenues to the fullest and thereby
reducing the dependency on income tax revenues.
• The maximum amount of debt to be issued is 10 percent less than the maximum
amount of debt that can be supported by the income tax revenue allocated as
available for annual debt service obligations, see page 3-2. This guideline provides ~""
an additional buffer in the event that income tax revenues fall short of projections or '~'
that an unexpected increase in interest rates occurs.
• As a matter of general policy, the City will do the following in order to be able to "``
fiend additional projects needed to serve the citizens of Dublin: ._
a) Pursue federal, state and local assistance in the form of grants, low interest ~
loans, cost-sharing, etc. ~,
08/ 1 I /97
t:\per\d kp\98-cep\2002
2-2
„,~, b) Utilize assessment procedures for projects which have a reasonably well
defined group of beneficiaries and which legally lend themselves to this type
of financing.
c) Look increasingly at ways to obtain revenue through user fees as a way to
fund capital projects or as a way to free-up other income tax dollars so that
"~" they can be used to fund capital projects.
d) Utilize, where appropriate, economic development incentives such as tax
3 increment financing.
r.
• As projects are proposed for funding, the statutory debt limitations will be reviewed to
ensure compliance. The affects, if any, on the "in-side millage" will be evaluated so we do
~" not adversely affect the financial health of the City or any overlapping taxing jurisdictions.
It should be noted that the recommended five-year program is an aggressive program. These prof ects
'~` need to be distributed over the five-year period so that as we update our capital program each year,
we can evaluate the capital needs, revenue growth, and unforeseen problems to be able to respond
to new priorities as they may occur.
w
08/11/97
t:\per\dkP\9R-CIP\2002 2-3
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
~"' REVENUE PROJECTIONS
.A
The primary funding source for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the City's
income tax revenue. Section 2 outlines the financial guidelines used in determining our fiscal
capacity to complete capital projects.
~. In addition to the income tax revenues, the projects that are associated with the water and sewer
..
systems will be funded in whole or in part by revenues from those systems (i.e. user charges and tap
::.~ permit fees).
~" The following pages provide projections for income tax revenues and projections for the water and
«r sewer system operations. The assumptions used for the projected water and sewer system operations
are included.
~" One assumption used in the preparation of the projected Sewer Fund financial statement is the annual
~, debt service obligation for the Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor (USWBI) will be retired
entirely from Sewer Fund revenues. The schedule for debt service payments from income tax
~" revenues, page 6-4, assumes a 50 percent income tax subsidy for the annual debt service obligations
relating to the USWBI. We will continue to utilize this assumption until the final project costs are
determined. These different assumptions were used to reflect the most conservative estimates for
both revenue sources. If no income tax subsidy or a subsidy less than the estimated 50% subsidy
~' is needed, then the reserves available from income tax revenue for other projects will be increased.
If our projected level in the Sewer Fund is not realized, then any additional subsidy would come
from the income tax revenues and we feel those dollars need to be shown as committed for that
.~
purpose.
~,
~,.
~.
08/1 I /97
T:\rcr\d k p\~R-rir\1.(1!2 ~ -1
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
~ O
O
Q' N
~ ~
W 0
f- I-
Z U a~
W W ~
~ O m
W ~
> d.
O
oo~.~
O ~ Z
m
~QW ~
r ~ ~ ~
0..
U
W ~
0
~ U or,
~ z ~;
LL
a
a
M .-- N 00 ~ V•
N M ~ N ~ ~
~ O 0 0 r r
~ ~ I~ ~
N O r
N M 0
( 00 O
M
M 00 M ~ O
~ l(')
~
69
00 V ~ ~ N ~
O I~ O O M O
N ~ (NO m ~ O
(O .- N M a0 0)
~N 00 M ~ ~ ~
69
(07 ~ N 00D V M
N 00 I~ O O O
0~0 ~ ~ ~ r N
O 0 r t~ O O
r
M 1~ C'7 V' 00
~• ~
~
EA
O O (O ~t
~ '7
r
M
~ N (O V
'
l~ 000 ~ ~ (N7 N
~ co o co o M
o ~ co v ~ VN'
69
0
0 0
0 0 o
0 o M
ao in
0
O t!7 V' .- I~ V•
0 ~ N
~ 7
( ~T I~
~
N I~ N ~' to
`7 O
V'
69
O O O O (O N
O O O O 0 ~
o
o ~n
~ o ~n
~ ~ cri
~ ~
m
rn rn r co M
N O N C a M
69
In
~ V'
c- (O 00
N CO N
ao V'
V
N M In 1~ M N
~
O .-
~ a0 N
V' N ~
r ~
~
V M l1) O 0 O
~
N (O N M M M
O
N
~ L +-+
~ (Y6 'U
L E
(0
C
~
U N 4)
U ~ --~ r
.
C
N ~
~p i ~
~
U .Q
~ ~~ M
~ ~
r
-
~ ~
~ ~ ~ N O 'UD j X ~
a
-~ -
• - ~
N N D .-
o
j N j 0 0 'II ` ~ Q1
~ U U
` (0 p N ~ ~ ~
"
X
m p •C
w-~ ~ d N-p
~ ~ m l9w ~
~.- C
~
o m
~ ~ U U
~ ~ ~
y
~° + 0)
N r
~
°
~ 7 4)
~~ t
il
o
E
U
S N - a~
i
a
~ U ~~ o
m (6 C o
N w
N
V
N
O
L
~ ~
(~ N
.~.
'Q O
Q
• U o O-
"
~
N
N
-
.O 'Q O ~
L ~
O C
~ N N U
~ .t.
y
•". N fU
~ ~ N~
-••
H ~ C N
tq .O
O U ~ ccs O
~ ~ ~ ~
O
-p -p c0
(a
L N N N
~ ~ C •X
~ ~~~ cv
T
~ ~ ~ N
o ~ ~ Q~
L L ~ ~
N
Q ~ ~ • ~
.
N a~ a~ C
w .N .N Q .Q
~ L ~ N ((S
C
C j
o O O ~
C
E ~ N CQ
N N .C C
3 ~
_ U O_ Q C
O
N •C ~ ~ O .
Q
~ •_ •-
U
(a ~ N N
~ ~_ Z
~ Q. Q~ N ~
U
~ U U O
~
N
: ~ N
N
~ ~
v-
N -
L L ~ N
O
O O N O~~
~ U U U p O~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ .Q•
•
•
N ~ ~
~ c
'
-
4) ~ O C O ~«-
L3
O RS
C N o c 0 "p O
o o N C ~'
> ~ N N ~ O O
Q1
•
C
C o
X
~~~ 0 0 0 0 0 .~.. w ~ O C0
`~-~ `-- ~ U
O~ O O~ d• N N O O~ O N
~.. ~
O ti 00 ~ O ~ N
L o o U~ "J
(6 "
rn rn 0 0 0 0
O p p
a
~ a~rnrnrnooo vcflU~' c
C L ~ .- ~ N N N .-..-. ^~~
~ r- N M ~'
* .~ ~ ~.~
d
a
a
U
N
O
E ~
r ~.~
~ ~°
~ ~i
~ d
O jy_
~~
3-2
,~
w~
bA
O
P-~
a~
a~
0
.~
U
N
O
O
N
Cl1
. O
U
•~~
^^~1
h~'~
0
U
f"~~
'~
~ 1. r:~
__..
~
0 ~
0
0
0
0
0
0 ~
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o ~ o ~ o
M M N N ~--~ r-'
3-3
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
01
00
O~
01
r~
1r~
/v~I
V/ ~
r~
r~
M
01
~,
N
Q~
~~
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED REVENUE, EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN SEWER FUND CASH BALANCE
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Revenues:
User charges $977,890 $1,076,436 $1,108,836 $1,143,936 $1,179,036 $1,214,136 $1,249,236
Tap fees 1,338,475 1,245,000 723,125 621,563 560,625 520,000 520,000
Interest 283,214 325,000 331,537 389,390 388,684 385,488 380,428
Other 2,247 0 0 0 0 0 0
Income tax subsidy 193,451 186,263 180,691 175,033 169 291 163 463 157,551
2,795,277 2,832,699 2,344,189 2,329,922 2,297,636 2,283,087 2,307,215
Expenses:
Salaries/wages 318,631 297,500 315,350 334,271 354,327 375,587 398,122
Benefits/uniforms 109,573 105,500 111,830 118,540 125,652 133,191 141,183
Utilities 49,688 55,000 25,000 26,500 28,090 29,775 31,562
Contract services 154,198 130,000 75,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Repairs and maintenance 68,620 135,000 125,000 100,000 106,000 112,360 119,102
West Branch maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 48,663 54,000 15,000 15,900 16,854 17,865 18,937
749,373 777,000 667,180 645,211 680,923 718,779 758,906
Capital expenditures 33,997 77,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Debt service:
Existing 193,451 186,263 180,691 175,033 169,291 163,463 157,551
New 0 0 0 1,477,330 1,477,330 1,477,330 1,477,330
193,451 186,263 180,691 1,652,363 1,646,621 1,640,793 1,634,881
Net cash (required)
provided 1,818,456 1,792,436 1,446,318 (17,652) (79,908) (126,485) (136,571)
Beginning balance 4,677,544 6,496,000 8,288,436 9,734,754 9,717,102 9,637,194 9,510,709
Ending balance $6,496,000 $8,288,436 $9,734,754 $9,717,102 $9,637,194 $9,510,709 $9,374,138
08/11 /97
3-4
Filename:t:\per\mig\utility\sewer
;' ~ 1998-2002
"~" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
,~, SEWER FUND ASSUMPTIONS
?~ Proiected User Charges and Tan Fees
s~
~, Assumptions:
~"` Revenues based on estimated ERUs and fees as authorized by Ordinance 14-92.
• Average number of ERUs for 1997 reflects a growth of 367. This is based on the number
of residential building permits issued in 1996 for new units.
~.
;~ Average number of ERUs for 1998 and forward are the total of the previous year's average
number of ERUs and the previous year's estimated ERU growth.
• Estimated ERU growth for 1997 through 2002:
1997 - 300
1998 - 325
1999 - 325
2000 - 325
2001 - 325
2002 - 325
• Beyond 2002 estimated ERU growth:
2003 - 2007 - 300
2008 - 2012 - 275
Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Charges in Sewer Fund Cash Balance
Assumptions:
• Revenues for user charges and tap fees are based on the schedule of Projected User Charges
and Tap Fees.
•. Interest income is based on previous year's ending fund balance and an interest rate of 4
percent for 1997 and forward.
,~
~„ Inflow and infiltration removal program will be on-going.
"' Completion of the (USWBI) is scheduled for year-end 1998. The expense line items reflect
the scheduled completion.
""~ Subsidy for debt service is the debt service obligation that matures each year for the lift
~"' station improvements.
o8n v9~
T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
3-5
Sewer Fund Assumptions (Continued)
• Debt service obligations identified as "New" reflects the annual debt service obligations for
the USWBI. This statement assumes the debt will be retired 100% from Sewer Fund
resources
The Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Sewer Fund Cash Balance was
prepared through the year 2017. Using the above assumptions, sufficient revenue will be available
through the year 2016. The rate of growth, the user fees and capacity charges will continue to be
evaluated.
~~
oail v~~
T: \per\d kp\98-C I P\2002
3-6
,~„ 1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
~+• STATEMENT OF PROJECTED REVENUE, EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN WATER FUND CASH BALANCE
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
,;,~, Revenues:
User charges $617,614 $626,220 $644,220 $663,720 $683,220 $702,720 $722,220
~~ Tap fees 1,221,914 650,000 487,500 487,500 487,500 487,500 487,500
~. Interest 201,199 184,633 188,846 200,626 226,103 253,100 281-,410
Fire hydrant permits 4,025 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.,000 1,000 1,000
~* Subsidy for debt service 568,083 543 917 522 397 476 992 470,783 419,960 402,441
2,612,835 2,005,770 1,843,963 1,829,838 1,868,606 1,864,280 1,894,571
Expenses:
Salaries/wages 25,308 43,500 44,500 46,725 49,061 51,514 54,090
Benefits/uniforms 8,333 16,350 16,500 17,325 18,191 19,101 20,056
Utilities 86,479 80,700 85,542 90,675 96,115 101,882 107,995
Equipment maintenance 40,318 45,000 47,700 50,562 53,596 56,811 60,220
Hydrant maintenance 14,187 43,000 45,580 48,315 51,214 54,287 57,544
`""` Other 12,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
186,625 243,550 249,822 263,601 278,177 293,595 309,905
:~„ Capital expenditures 82,847 700,000 370,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
~» Debt service:
Existing 607,608 581,667 558,372 512,375 503,208 450,610 431,316
~"' 1994 issue 324,811 375,233 371,255 366,945 362 303 362 328 361,688
932,419 956,900 929,627 879,320 865,511 812,938 793,004
"' Net cash (required)
provided 1,410,944 105,320 294,514 636,917 674,918 707,747 741,662
Beginning balance 3,204,883 4,615,827 4,721,147 5,015,661 5,652,578 6,327,496 7,035,243
~"' Ending balance $4,615,827 $4,721,147 $5,015,661 $5,652,578 $6,327,496___ _$7,035,243 $7,776,905
'~"' 08/11/97
;~
3-7
~.
F!"~ +~amc !:'.~~r1.+~ir;+_itil~tylwster
1998 - 2002 `~'
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ~,
WATER FUND ASSUMPTIONS
The following information provides the assumptions used in the analysis.
Projected User Changes and Tap Fees
Assumptions:
• Revenues based on ERUs and authorized fees established by Ordinance 14-92.
• Average number of ERUs for 1997 reflects a growth of 367. This is based on the
number of residential building permits issued in 1996 for new units.
• Average number of ERUs for 1998 and forward are the total of the previous year's
average number of ERUs and the previous year's estimated ERU growth.
• Estimated ERU growth for 1997 through 2002:
1997 - 300
1998 - 325
1999 - 325
2000 - 325
2001 - 325
2002 - 325
• Beyond 2002 estimated ERU growth:
2003 - 2007 - 300
2008 - 2012 - 275
Statement of Proiected Revenue. Expenses and Changes in Water Fund Cash Balance
Assumptions:
• Revenues for user charges and tap fees based on schedule of Projected User Fees and
Projected Tap Fees.
• Salaries/wages and Benefits/uniforms included for water hydrant program.
• Other expenses assume a 6.00 percent inflation rate.
• Subsidy for debt service is the debt service obligation that matures each year for the
debt issued in 1990 and before, except for the Avery Road waterline.
• The 1994 issue debt service obligation provides funding for the debt service
obligations on the $4,100,000 in long-term bonds issued for the Rings/Blazer water
tower.
osil v~~
T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
3-8
.Water Fund Assumptions (Continued)
The Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Water Fund Cash Balance was
prepared through the year 2014. Using the above assumptions, sufficient revenue will be available,
as well as maintaining a considerable reserve, throughout the life of existing and proposed debt
obligations. The rate of growth and the user fees and capacity charges will continue to be evaluated
to ensure that a deficit fund balance does not. occur.
The assumptions do not have funding for additional water towers programmed. However, based on
~~ estimated fund balances, sufficient funds are estimated to be available to begin programming these
~,, capital projects.
08/11/97
T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
~" 3-9
~"'`
,~ ,.
M.
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
~r MAJOR PROJECTS
'~ ~~ Project Prioritization
In developing the Five-Year CIP several elements are taken into consideration: City Council goals,
'~ both past and present; findings included in the Economic Development Strategy; commitments made
~ by the City in agreements such as tax increment financing agreements; and the residents' opinions
as voiced by their vote in 1990 which authorized the City to issue voted debt for transportation
improvements, parkland acquisition, municipal facilities construction expansion and the construction
""' of a community recreation center. See page 4-36 for a listing of resource documents used in
,. preparing the CIP. Utilizing this criteria resulted in projects to be funded that are biased towards
needed infrastructure improvements such as roads and utility needs. Higher priority is also given
to projects where federal, state and local assistance is being pursued or has been approved.
The major projects included in the Five-Year CIP total $122.9 million. Of the total, 68.6% or $84.3
million is for transportation related projects. This is a result of the above listed criteria. Because of
our reliance on income tax revenues, it is of utmost importance to provide an adequate transportation
,~, system to help retain our current business customers as well as encourage new business to locate in
Dublin.
The following pages reflect the projects to be funded, project descriptions, and a recap of the funding
sources.
08/11/97
T:\per\dkp\97-C1P\2002
4-1
.,
o
O` o
~ O
' ° o ~:
o ~4~'
0
N ~
O
O
O
O
O O
N
flf
r
O
O
N
N
N
O
O
O
N
O
rn
rn
r
Q O
O
~ m
~ (~ ti
Z
C ~-- O
G w ~
W -~
O
O Q.' d
NOD ~cn
~ J ~ O Q
~ ~- ~ a' }
Q. LL'
Q
U
w ~ ~-
V
W O C.
~_
U
w
O
Q'
d
O O O O ~
O O
.
C rrw
~
O_
C
(U 4_.v
O
p ~ O O O O O
~ O ~
~
~ O ~ Lf) N
O
p ~ ~ ~
t
fl_
r ~n
~ o
U
~
Y
O O O
0 0 O
O O O O
~ O O
3
N O M
0 m 0 ~ O O ~ O O C
V- r
~ (+
7
~
~ 0 0
O 0 0
°
O N ll ~ O)
_ p o u> ~
o o N cn
N ~
'i ~ N ~ p O ~ ~
u O IYY
ti ~ ~ ~
O
O O
O Q O 0 0 o O
O t17 O ~ O o
O O O
O ~
N
O O O 00 ~ o O
O ~ (p M O o O O
N N ~ ~
O O N
0 o O O
O ~ o p ~~ O E
~~~ M ~ M o~0 .Q
~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ M M M ~
0
~ ~ ^
N O N 000 00
o O_t00~
~ ~ ~
~O `~ O
O ti
~ O
O O
O
r O ti
~
(O
u'~
CV N
O CC
C
O
R O ~
O t17 O
N M
~
~ ~ V C
~ (O ~,
N
N ~ O ~ ~ ~
~ N
~
N ~ ~ N
N N t~ ~ M 1~ N ^
t0 M ~
~ ""'
~ ~
m 0 0 0 0
0000 O
rM00 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
O0')O r O O h 0
f0 W V ~
(D O
r
' N M,
(O M 0 0
N 00 O 0 0
M M
C7 CA O O O °~ 000 ~ r00 (00 N N
~~ r NN O O
N
O °~
N'~f ~
~ O O O O~ p
O O O ~ ~ ~VN pp
V 117 (NO 00p N N~ ~
N
~
~ O O N O ~
00 0 0? ~
O O O O M
t M
~
('rj lf')
N
N
O
ice.
f0
~ O
c0 ~ ~ d' o ~? i ~ M
,~
rn
~ O C
.
i
N N
N
O
U ~
~ ~
O
i
c
~ ~
'O U
C ~
L
O
Q a ~ ~
C
U ~ L -O
oty UJ y
~ N
N
C _C
~ C
p~ . U! S
E c ~n A N N N ~ °~ ~
.C _
V1 O w LA Q_ w m N w ~ w L
C° ~ O rn I
C p m N
O ` O ~
C y (
II N
I.I.A
+' vi
~ a~
~
c
~ O a~ =
fl- ~
~ C
p
o
W C N
O a
i
C ~ .N C
O ~
O ~ 'O V ,
c> O
~
N U m N 'O N
N
m ~
a)
(O W Y W ai
N +~
U c
~ aNi m W
i w u~i
p O~ w C ~ ~~ c ~ ~~ o c N a
c a~ ~ c ~
~~
~ a1 m
o s
~ d
~~ ~ o O c
O m
V
'U c
a o
0
r c
m U ~ o
>,
(0
` ~
C ° U
` N
~
' ° X
T
°Ol .
~ ~
N L
Q
.C w ~ U w X ` ` ~ N .N
f
6 N
w N
r U
i
`
' 2 `-
' ~
L ~
~
` c
~~~~ °UO+" "~
n
5
~
Q ~
o
o L
o.o,cro
` a ~ ~ o
~ oo
~
:°-
~~aa~o ,ow
c
u~
m~c
~
v~aa~o~~aaoo~ o
o
vaa~oF ~°_ r a
°' E
w Q ~ a a
F-- ~
cn ~ i
4-2
c
c
n
c
c
n
c
c
c
o;
a;
o;
r
Q O
~ O
a
w ~ ~
W O
W ~
O ~ ~
~~W BUJ
p~jJ~ ~¢
r ~= Q-}
a, LL
Q
U
W ¢ H
O ~
~ ~
r
U
W
O
d
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
° 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
o ~
N o
~ ~
v
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o O
0
0
0 0
~ o
M
O
0 O
p O O o
o 0 O O
o O
O o ~ p
M L(') N L!') N O
M N cn N
M
O O O O O O O N ~ O O O
O ~ O ~ O In O ~ 'C ~ O ~
0 0 0 NV N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O
~ f t
0 0 .
d7 (O ~ (D
r ~ I~
ti a0
o
~ to O ~ u~ o c'o
~ ~ rn N O~ o
oi O
~ o
coo u°i ~ o
°o O
~ o
°o O
p
c
i ~ ~ u N o
.-- ~
m
N O ~ ~ ~ ~ N tOA (O N V
N p 1
l
A O ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~
M ~ 1~ M ~ V' l1') ~ N
p ~
~ o eo o
t17 N ~ o v~ o co
M t0 l'7 O p~ 0 0 0 0
O o o 0
p 0 o co o
t(7 O ~p
~ o 0 0 o
O O p
p o 0 0 o
O O p
p
O M
M ~
~ V' O_ O N M
~ N N O
( p (O O O
V' (O O H O O
t0 O p O O
~ O p
ap
N -
~- m V O N
O M ('7 O 01 O (O
O O
N O M O N l!7 O ~(1 CO O V'
.-- l~7 ~ In In O O N ~ N N M .- O N E .- ~ (O N N ~
N V' ~ I~ ~ ~ QO V N 00 M V'
N ~ ~- ~ M
~ O
(6 -
O U
~ N
C ~
_
'O N
C ~
C
7
~
-
~ _
C
Y
C
•
~ C LL.
`
~
o~' Ems' ~
~,~°- ~ ~
~..°-~ ~ ~
w °w' ~w
N c O c ~ m L~ L~ n" C
'O w >. N M w ?. v >. N p a°i
~ c
G !p (II c
~i C N ~ c
~ ~ fn R c
~ C ~ c
~ C y c
O C (q
i ~ W d ` W a~ ~ W v ~ W ` w w N W d
i N~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ rn~ .O ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ C~ ~ ~
0- ~ c
.~ ai 0.. ~ c
.~ •
m ~
c
.~ w Q. ~ c
.° S ~ ~
c .~ m ~ 3 c
.U w
o ~
o o
~ o o o
.
O
V
L ~ ~ V U O N .t. Y N U Q O L (II N U ~ p ~ a~+ O V ~ p L ~~. (n V ~ p t ~
.
.
U
U¢¢UO ~ W ¢¢U~O ~ Q ¢ ¢ U O ~ W ¢ ¢ U ~ W ¢ ¢ U O ~ ¢ ¢ U O
~ ~ ~
t~ N O O
~ ~
~ N
r
a
.~
d
O
m
h n.
~ E
c
~ v
o
4-3
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O)
r
G
Q O
~"'
W F- rn
W ~
W ,~
N ~ ~ ~ uJ
Q Z ~ ~
a
°' I_ ~ ~ }
~ ~
Q
U
W a H
} F- U
I.LI O ~.
>_
LL..
0 0 0 0 0 0
O ~ O O O O O
O O
O O
~
N ~
N
O O O O O O O
O O
~ O
N O
N
N
O O O O
O
O
0 0 0
0
O
O
p ~ p ~ O ~ 0 0 0 0
O O O O M O
p O O O '
N O ~ O ~ O 0 0 ~ (
7
tf) N ~ M ~ .-- M r
~j M ~
O O O O O
0 O O O
O O
. O
OO 00 0 O O ~
~ ~ O O O O O
N O ~ O M l!') ~
~ M CO
r O ~ O ~ O 00 p0 0O 00 ~
~ ~ O ~ O ~ O O O O O
~ ~ M M ~ O r ~ OOO N O
M rt M r 00
- I~ V O
tC
~,,~ M . .- ?
O M O O O O O O O
O
O r ~ O O ~
O) O
(O ~ ~
N In
~ N
I ~ ~
o ~7 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 O O O O
0 0 0 0 p
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 00
o n o
ono ~ o 0 o
000 O 0 0 O
0 0000 0 000 0 0 o O
O)
O
r ,n N N O 0
In M O ('~ O O~ M O ~ O~ In ~ N O
O
1
V' O N CO
(O N O rt f7 ~ r' M O .-- ~ r M In O ~ O
~ ~ ~ t~ '- ~ N ri ~ .= ri o o ~ ~
O N M ~ ~
D)
~
~ C
N ~
C
O N
v
~
v
N N
N
~ U N
~ w of
N VO-. m w .,0._ r0-
j ~
~ ~ O_ ~
~ .~ ~ C CO m
. m
.
C ~~ 1 ~ "gyp •N N ~
+' N
~
~ c
~ O ~
c m
3~ ~ 3
c ~
c
a m Y .~ O
r m a m e a c c ui ~ a
W ~ N
lII W v N W v c W a~ O W m
U N W N
'
~ ~ C N O.. ~ C C 'O f0 C C N N C C N C C
~ IO C C
.
~ N
C
f- C .~ U 1 "O ~ C ~ W N C .~ U7 ~ > C .~ N
O N
~ ~ C
' .
~ O
~ U w U X 3 p !"' U N N
Q U O U U
~ d N o ~ N ` N
~ d
~ ~
~
~ ~
N N
7 U1 U
N
3 (A N Vl
7 "~ ~3 N
t W
7 ~ ~ ° L
7 N N
L D N L 7
L D L
L l
w ~ L
t
~ ~ ~
Q O L
C '~"'
O ~ U O ..L.
~ o . +-
o W ~ U O
a a ~ o o C .U.. U O
~- a a ~ o o ~+ ~ U O
= a a ~ o o ,
U O
= a a ~ o w
o `
~ a a ~ o
> 0
H
a a f- Z I- ~ F- H H Y I-
M
~ V'
~ lf~
~ O
`_ ti
r O
r
m
0
4-4
~.~
aipp
srr
7911Y
,~,-~.
„ate
..~.
AID
Y/
w~
*At
I
1
Q ~
~ ~
c
a
w ~ ~
w O
W ~
O Q' ~
O a
~~~ ~U.
0
~ J ~ ~ Q
~ ~ ~ a }
a ~-
Q
U
~'
~--~ H
} ¢ ~
LL
H
U
W
0 0 o O o 0
N
O
O
N
O O O O O O O
~
r
p O
O O
~ ~ O
:V ~
o° o
O O O O O O O
O ~
o p
~
V n ~
~
O O
O
h
O ~ p O O O O
~ O
~
~ ~O
: O
O
_ d ~
~
0 00 00 00 00 0° O
0 °o 0
p 0 0 0
i o
o °
~ q
°o °
0 o
° 0 °
° o ° °
°
o o°
v
~
~
~ 0
~ o
~ o
^ O u
~ i
n
N i~ o
O
~ (V O
M
o ~ o o ° ° ° o
0 0
~ () N
~
M O
N
D O O O O O O
O
r ~
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 o
p p
o o 0 0 0
o
p
O O p° °
~
0 0 0 0
p
O O O o
O
O O
O O 0
O o
O o p O
O o o
o 0 O
~
~ O
~ N O
V In O O
~ OO rn O O O O N N p
~"' (O
- ~ O 00 O ^ ~ ~ N N O
r ~ ~ M
C
O C
~
'~
C N
a ~ a
~ `~ ~
a~ _ -
N o m
~ ~ a~
U ayi
~
'~ v
~ N
N
c
~
O rn
„'
3 w
U „' a
i
N ,v
~
O r-+ c ~ (
U
C N~
C ~
L ~
II. N
~Q
N y
N ~
//
~/
VJ
T N
i
-~ '
C N c
>~
C
~
~
(
II
c
~~
y ~ ~
~ W ~
~ W aNi ~
2G
`
N M .~
N a,~
E c m
c
m c
~ c
o d N
~~ c c
,
o ~ c N
m
c W a
i
~ ~
m c c (
~ n W a
i
~
m c ,
W ar
'O
~
_
T ~ p U _, c
y
~ ~ ~ ~ o
O ~ ~ . a~ ~ ~ c ~ w ~ c
C ~ a~
~ c
t6 ~° c o ~
~ c 7~ O U ` x ~: ° x ~ ,~ U ~ Q ~ O~
~ U ~ O L ~ ~ ` ~ p L N ` U a ~ L N N
Q' C fII ~ U .
C t L 3 N~
a¢ U o ~ v a a U o' o aa`aUO ~° U
L
w ~ ~ o~.
Q Q U O ~Q
o> ~
a`a~o (6
° ~
`a~o
~
~ F - ' a ~
~ N N N M
N ~
N c
c
d
~U
d
O
m
.~
a
i v
E
i v
~ LL
4-5
0
N
O
O
N
O
O ~ ~
o
O ~
~ ~ ~ O ~
~
N r
O ~
O
O
O ~
O ~
N a0
O ~
O
O
~
~ ~
~
M
~
r ~
N
o ~
th
~ ~
~
Q' ~
r O
(~ M
d O ~
fn N
~"' ~ ~ O
W ~
U rn ~
ao
~
w ~
w
-' ~
>
~~
0
.. o °
0 ~
N~~ ~~ ui ~ ~
Q
~ ~ ? ~ }
~.. U-
V ooo0oop N
,r, o u~
W ~ F- `~ CO ~ M
L11 ~ ~ ~ N
~_ ~
ll..
O
N
N
.
`
H ~
O_
w
,~ ~ ~
C ,.-
~ "O 01
O
~ N O '~-
>' ~ c
~ N •
~
~W
~
(4 ~ ~ o c
0.. c ._ m
O
~
~. ~
(` L .~. N _
~
~ Q
` ~~
W~ Q Q U O~
~
N p
4-6
A
w
„r
~r
~.
~+
~e.
V1
i
W ~~
~aX
sp
W
r^ 7•
V 1 ~:
O
T~/~
E ' V1
~;
O ' O
~i
''
l O
'"'~'~ r T 1 1
P-~ ~ w ; ~
~Q~~~
~ ~;
~~
U ~,
~ ~~
~ ~~
w
W ~~
~ `-.
W `
E
L_J f ~
~'
4-7
a;
M
o
o ~
V1 ~
r.+
M ~",
U
o •~
.
~ o ~
U
. o U
~
~
r ~
T.
. ~,~.
U ~ ^
C
O
U
h" "' ;
f.., .
t__~ ~.~:
~
~
-
-
, -,
0
v
rn
rn
...
.~
1. Uaaer Scioto West Branch Interceptor
The Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor (USWBI) has always been planned to provide the ~'
main sewer interceptor to transfer the sewage from the Dublin collector system to the ~.~
Columbus treatment facility. The current service agreement with the City of Columbus
requires the City to pay for construction costs associated with the portion of the USWBI that '""'"
lies within the Dublin corporate boundaries. This project involves the construction of a 72-
inch deep tunnel gravity sewer line parallel to Dublin Road. The deep tunnel method ""`
minimizes surface disruption and adverse impacts on properties within the construction zone; ~
however, the capital cost involved is significant. Design of the project is being handled by "'
the City of Columbus and is substantially complete. _
The City has been awarded aloes-interest loan through the Ohio EPA to fund the project.
Repayment of the loan does not start until construction is completed in 1998. During the
construction period, drawdowns will be received and interest will accrue on the draws. The
final loan amount will be the total project costs plus accrued interest. The loan will be repaid
over a 20 year period with level debt payments being required.
The City was also awarded a credit enhancement grant from the Ohio Public Works
Commission in the amount of $850,050. This grant will be used to pay for the interest costs
accrued during the construction period and a portion of the first year's interest obligation.
City Council passed legislation in April 1992 increasing the sewer capacity charges and
establishing a sewer surcharge. The intent of the legislation is to provide a revenue stream
to significantly reduce the subsidy needed from the General Fund to the Sewer Fund for
operating and capital costs. The revenues for the increased capacity charges and a portion
of the user fees are expected to retire at least 50 percent of the cost of this project and the
remaining user fees are expected to pay for the operating costs of the system. Based on the
current projections, we expect to retire a higher percentage of the debt from the Sewer Fund,
thereby, providing additional income tax revenues for other projects.
Status
• The project is 70% complete.
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002. 4_g
~, m~
,~.
~+ 2. S.R. 161 -Dale to Sawmill
This public improvement consists of widening a 4,800 foot section of S.R. 161 beginning
~" at Dale Drive and ending at Sawmill Road. The completion of this project will result in two
~.,.~ continuous eastbound and westbound lanes from Sawmill Road to Avery Road.
~, Major improvements associated with this street widening include: a reconstruction of the
~. intersections at Dale Drive, Dublin Center Drive and Sawmill Road with modifications to
existing turn lanes and existing signalization; providing one or two new signalized
intersections; providing a four lane boulevard street with curb and gutter; landscaped median
'" and shoulders; public utilities which include water mains, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers;
street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways.
~'" In addition, this improvement includes planning, traffic studies, design, surveying,
geotechnical investigations, noise analysis, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and
sediment control, right-of--way and easement acquisition, right-of--way plat, private utility
coordination, service road between Dale Drive and Shamrock Boulevard, and reconfiguration
"~ of parking lots between LaScala, Franks Nursery, Tommy Shopping center, and other
~. activities necessary and appurtenant to the completion of this project.
Project costs reflected are total estimated project costs. The project has been approved by
h~ Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission and is included in the Regional Transportation
,~„ Improvement Program for construction in 1999. The Federal/State funds will be utilized to
significantly offset the total project costs. We are estimating the City's local share will be
~" approximately $2.0 million.
City Council passed legislation in April 1992 to establish a cooperative agreement with the
State of Ohio, Department of Transportation for this project.
Status
-" R-O-W acquisition is planned for 1998.
• Design is substantially complete.
• Construction is planned for 1999.
~..
.~
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-9
A*~
~w
~~
wr
3. Scioto Bridge Construction
••,
This project involves the construction of an additional bridge over the Scioto River. In 1991, *~
the city purchased land on the west side of the Scioto River in anticipation of this project. •,•
The City entered into tax increment financing/economic development agreements providing ''
for the construction of Emerald Parkway connecting Coffinan Road on the west and Dublin
Road on the east. The additional Scioto Bridge will be aligned with the new connector road. `""
.~
It is anticipated that design will be completed in 1997, the remaining R-O-W will be acquired °'•
in 1998 and construction will be initiated in 1998. The project will be funded using $4.1 ~,~
million in cash reserves and $7.8 million from bond proceeds. The bonds will utilize the
~~
City's voted authority for transportation improvements.
~~
~~
Status
• A design contract has been executed.
• R-O-W acquisition on the west side of the Scioto River has been obtained.
• Remaining R-O-W will be acquired in 1998.
• Construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in 1998.
,.~.
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-10
r. 4. Coffman Road Widening and Emerald Parkway Extension to Perimeter Drive
~..
,~„ This public improvement consists of widening a 5,800 foot section of Coffman Road
beginning at Brand Road and ending at Post Road. This improvement does not include the
'"" recently constructed bridge over the South Fork Indian Run and widening associated with
~ the bridge construction.
Major improvements associated with this street widening improvement include: a
reconstruction of the intersection at Tara Hill Drive and Brand Road with turn lanes and
signalization; providing a three lane street with curb and gutter from north of Tara Hill Drive
to Brand Road; providing a five lane street with curb and gutter from north of the bridge over
'~ South Fork Indian Run to North Fork Indian Run; a possible pedestrian underpass near Tara
,,, Hill Drive; landscaped shoulders; public utilities which include water mains, sanitary sewers,
and storm sewers; street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways.
In addition, this improvement includes planning, traffic studies, design, surveying,
geotechnical investigations, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and sediment control,
right-of--way and easement acquisition, right-of--way plat, private utility coordination, and
other activities necessary and appurtenant to the completion of this project.
The project also involves extending Emerald Parkway south from existing Post Road to
Perimeter Drive extended. It includes the extension of Perimeter Drive east approximately
1,000 lineal feet from Commerce Parkway to the proposed Emerald Parkway extension.
The improvements include three-lane pavement for Perimeter Drive and four-lane pavement
with landscaped median for Emerald Parkway. Included in the project will be curbs and
gutters, street lighting, storm sewers, sidewalk and/or bikeways, a bikeway underpass at the
intersection of Emerald Parkway and Perimeter Drive, water main, sanitary sewer, traffic
control devises, and landscaping within the right-of--way.
This project will be completed using cash reserves, funding from The Ohio Public Works
Commissions Ohio Local Transportation Improvement Program (LTIP) and service
payments in lieu of taxes. The public infrastructure improvements identified for the project
are included in the tax increment financing (TIF) agreement entered into between the City
and Continental Real Estate Companies. It is estimated the TIF will provide funding for the
improvements south of Post Road which are estimated to be $2,448,000.
For funding purposes, we have identified that $2,448,000 will be available from service
payments associated with the TIF, $2,371,000 in LTIP funding, and $1,513,000 in City
revenue.
Status
• The project is currently under construction and is expected to be substantially
complete by year-end 1997.
O8/i l/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
~w
4-11
~,
5. Frantz Road/SR 161 Upgrade
Major improvements associated with this intersection improvement include: reconstruction
of the intersection at Frantz Road/S.R. 161/Post Road and Frantz Road/Metro Place North
with modifications to the existing turn lanes and existing signalization; providing curb and
gutter with the street widenings; providing access to the McKitrick property with possible
Frantz Road median breaks and Metro Place North access; landscaped medians and
shoulders; public utilities which include water mains, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers;
street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways and interconnection of various signals.
The City was awarded a grant from the Ohio Public Works Commission in the amount of
$2.7 million for this project. The remainder of the project will be funded utilizing cash
reserves.
Status
Design is complete.
Acquisition is on-going.
Construction contract awarded at the July 7, 1997 Council meeting.
08/11/97
T:\PCR\DKP\98-C I P\2002.
4-12
~,
,~.
`~' 6. Cosgray Park Development
This project includes the development of the park in accordance with the completed Master
Plan. Improvements currently being completed include the necessary ground improvements,
including fencing, building structures, landscaping, pedestrian walkways, parking areas and
;~ athletic field development. Funding programmed for 1997, 1998, and 1999 will provide for
r~~, an additional set of restrooms, playground equipment, tennis and basketball courts, athletic
field lighting and additional site furnishing.
Washington Township has committed to provide $375,000 in funding over a three year
period, 1997, 1998, and 1999.
Status
• The park is scheduled to open in the summer of 1997.
~"` osil v9~
T: \P ER\DKP\98-C I P\2002.
•" 4-13
.~
7. Coffman Park Redevelopment ,,,
The initial phase of Coffinan Park redevelopment was scheduled to coincide with the
construction of the Community Recreation Center. Master planning for the park has been
completed. The Master Plan identified the park components of the redevelopment with the
associated costs, which has enabled a phasing of the redevelopment based on funding levels.
Funding programmed for 1998 through 2000 will complete the implementation of the
Coffinan Park Master Plan. Funding in 1998 will provide funding for a community stage,
a multi-use plaza and development of the "lawn", including additional electricity for special
events, paths, and irrigation. 1999 funding will allow for the development of the pond area
near the Community Recreation Center and continued lawn development. The
redevelopment will be completed in the year 2000 with the addition of restrooms, walkways,
lighted tennis courts, sand volleyball area, and a water play experience.
Status of 1997 Funding
• Design is being completed.
• Construction is anticipated to begin in the fall.
o8n v~~
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-14
~..,
~. ,.:.~
8. Emerald Parkway -Coffman to Dublin Road
The public improvements consist of constructing a new four lane east-west boulevard to
connect Coffman Road with Dublin Road, with that improvement extending approximately
5,600 lineal feet east from Coffirian Road, from a point south of Dublin Coffman High
School to Dublin Road. The construction of this new connector road is provided for in tax
increment financing/economic development agreements with Cardinal Health, Inc. and the
Alter Group, Ltd. The agreements required the City to construct approximately 2,000 lineal
feet of the project by June 30, 1996 with the remainder of the road substantially completed
by December 31, 1996. These time frames were met.
Major improvements associated with this new street include: a new intersection at Coffman
~. Road with turn lanes and signalization; a four lane boulevard street with curb and gutter;
landscaped median and shoulders; public utilities which include water mains, sanitary
sewers, and storm sewers; street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways.
In addition, this improvement includes planning, traffic studies, design, surveying,
geotechnical investigations, noise analysis, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and
'""° sediment control, right-of--way and easement acquisition, right-of--way plat, private utility
.~ coordination, and other activities necessary and appurtenant to the completion of this project.
~' Status
• The project is substanially complete. Traffic signals will be installed during the
summer of 1997 and landscaping is scheduled for installation in the fall of 1997.
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-15
~-
9. Aver Road/U.S. 33/Shier Rin s Intersections «r
The City completed the Avery Road Corridor Traffic Study in January 1996. As a result of
i
n
d l
-t
s
~~e
,.
o
g
the study near-term, intermediate-term an
mclude:
These improvement
vement s
the near-term impro
f
or
identified provides funding
an traffic signal at the ramp intersection located just south of
wire-s
li
"
p
n-
Dub
installing a temporary
the U.S. 33 overpass; construction of additional traffic lanes and the installation of
an
a
R ~
d
o
standard" traffic signal at the intersection of Avery
and the i ritiag on o fhe required
t Perimeter Loop Ro
l
"
..,-
a
traffic signa
a "Dublin-standard
Modification Study" to meet Federal and State requirements for the
" ~
Interchange
intermediate-term and long-term improvements. r.
The City entered into a cooperative agreement with Franklin County for these improvements.
tio ~
The City is responsible for the project design and acq~ on
o'ectt The City' max mum
the construc p J
t
i
i
er
s
n
Franklin County will award and adm
contribution for the construction is $500,000.
Status
Design is substantially complete.
Acquisition of R-O-W is on-going.
Constniction contract is expected to be awarded by the fall of 1997.
~~
08/1 I/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002. [~-16
~,.
' 10. Emerald Parkway -Phase 3 (Thomas/Kohler TIFF
This public improvement consists of constructing approximately 3,000 feet of Emerald
Parkway from Rings Road to the northernmost property line of the property known as the
"Thomas/Kohler site", the construction of the Woerner-Temple/Rings extension from
Emerald Parkway to the western property line on the site and approximately 550 feet of
Parkwood Drive, extending east of Emerald Parkway. The project includes curbing,
landscaping, sidewalks, bikepaths and bike tunnels, street lighting, traffic signals, traffic
control measures, the construction of public sanitary sewers, storm sewers and water lines.
"" The City committed $3 million for this project and $3 million is being funded through
~" service payments in lieu of taxes that will be collected over the next several years. The City
and the School District entered into an amended Income Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement
which allows the City to receive the service payments without sharing income tax revenues
~'" generated from the development.
The Tax Increment Financing/Economic Development Agreement also included in the
remaining construction of Parkwood Drive. The Parkwood Drive construction will be
completed in conjunction with the Woerner-Temple/Rings Connector project.
Status
• Construction of Emerald Parkway -Phase 3 is substantially complete and was
opened to traffic in early July.
08/11 /907
*~' T:\pcr\dkp\98-CIP\2002
4-17
11. Emerald Parkway -Phase 4
This project is for the construction of Emerald Parkway from the northernmost property line
of the "Thomas/Kohler site" Emerald Parkway improvements to and including the proposed ,~,_
intersection of Emerald Parkway and Innovation Drive, the construction of approximately
1,000 feet Innovation Drive from from its present terminus to Emerald Parkway and the
costruction of Shamrock Court from its present terminus to Emerald Parkway.
The project is being funded 50% from cash reserves and 50% from future service payments
,,.
in lieu of taxes from the Applied Innovation -Phase II TIF.
Status
• The construction contract was awarded on April 14, 1997.
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CI P\2002.
4-18
,~a,
12. Post Road/I-270 Overpass Widening
~.
~. The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), as part of their I-270 widening prof ect, will
be raising the height of the Post Road/I-270 overpass. This project, in conjunction with
`" ODOT's project, would widen the overpass to match the widened roadway approaches.
~•• Similar to the Rings Road/I-270 overpass widening, ODOT, will agree to complete the
widening as part of their project as long as the City agrees to pay the additional design and
construction costs associated with the widening.
The programming is based on ODOT's time schedule. The project will be funded with
available cash resources.
Status
• Design is currently being completed.
aw
~.
08/11 /97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-19
13. Woerner-Temple/Rings Road Connector
This project includes the construction of the Woerner-Temple/Rings Road extension from
Emerald Parkway, east to I-270 and from the western property line of the "Thomas/Kohler '
site" through to Avery Road. The project also includes the construction of the remaining ~
1,100 feet of Parkwood Drive and the intersection modifications at Avery and Rings Roads.
The construction includes curbing, landscaping, sidewalks, bike paths, street lighting, traffic `~
signals, and traffic control measurers. The portion of the roadway from Emerald Parkway '"'
east to I-270 will only be placed in service when the portion of Rings Road located between
Emerald Parkway and I-270 is discontinued as a public through street and the remainder of `'
the roadway is completed through to Avery Road. '"""
This public infrastructure improvement project, in the near future, is contingent upon
300,000 square feet of space being completed on the Thomas/Kohler site. The project,
except for Parkwood Drive, will be funded using income tax revenues generated from the
development on the site. Parkwood Drive will be funded as part of the Thomas/Kohler TIF,
as identified in the Tax Increment Financing/Economic Development Agreement.
Status
• The City has acquired the R-O-W, with the exception of one property, for this
project.
• Design is currently being completed.
• The construction is programmed for 1999; however, it is contingent upon the
construction of future office space on the "Thomas/Kohler" site.
08/11 /97
T:\P E R\ DKP\98-C I P\2002.
4-20
r ..
,,~~
w~
14. N.E. Quad Park
In 1991, the city purchased approximately 35 acres of land on the south side of Summitview
Road between Riverside Drive and Sawmill Road for a future park. The park will be
developed as an active community~park, and will include athletic fields. Master planning of
~' the park is being completed.
The funding programmed for 1999 will provide for engineering design and final grade and
,.~ seeding of the area. Future programming will be evaluated once the Master Plan for the park
,., is completed.
,r osil I~97
T:\E'ER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-21
~_ :~,
~~
15. Rims Road/I 270 Overpass Widening
This project includes widening of the Rings Road/I-270 overpass to match the widened
approaches. The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is planning to replace the deck
on the existing overpass and has agreed to widen the overpass as part of their deck ~~,
replacement project as long as the City agrees to pay the additional construction costs r~
associated with the wldening. The widening will provide additional capacity that will be ~
needed in the future and for connection witheast torFrantzRoadrner-TemplelRings Road
realignment and the widening of Rings Road
ODOT has programmed their deck replacement project for 1998. The project will be funded ~*~
with available cash resources.
Status
A design agreement was executed in July 1997.
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-22
16. Tuttle Crossing Wdenin
,.,~
~~
~,
~.
~r
mw
,..
This public infrastructure project includes the widening of Tuttle Crossing to a four-lane
boulevard from the City's corporation limits to Wilcox Road. The widening and extension
of Tuttle Crossing was identified as a high priority project in the Southwest Area Plan.
The Franklin County Engineer has agreed to participate in this project. The City will fund
the design, right-of--way acquisition and non-roadway improvements such as, landscaping
and street lighting and Franklin County will fund the roadway construction. The City's share
of the project will be funded with available cash resources.
The funds programmed in 1997 were for the construction of a temporary turn lane. This is
dependent upon development of the area.
osil v~~
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-23
17. Krier Drive Connection
As a result of a traffic study, it has been determined the connection of Krier Drive to Dublin
Center Drive will significantly improve traffic conditions in the surrounding area. This
project provides for the direct connection of Dublin Center Drive with Krier Drive and will
provide a parallel route to Sawmill Road serving businesses along the connector road. This
connector has been approved as part of the City's Thoroughfare Plan.
The project will be funded with available cash resources.
Status
• The project has not been initiated.
08/11 /97
T:\P ER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-24
1S. Venture Drive
The public infrastructure improvements consists of pavement and appropriate appurtenances
for the construction of Venture Drive. The City will also construct approximately 4,280 feet
of sanitary sewer, including abandoning in place and replacing approximately 225 feet of
existing sanitary sewer near the existing eastern terminus of Wall Street. The City will also
construct all of the required public improvements located within the public right-of--way or
easements granted to the City including earthwork, asphalt, curbing, landscaping within the
,,~, right-of--way or easements, sidewalks, street lighting, and pavement markings and traffic
signing. In addition, the City will construct storm sewers and water lines in general
• conformance with the approved preliminary plat. Such improvements also include all
necessary easements, rights-of--way, plats, plans, permits and other related documents or
construction not specifically mentioned but which is required for constructing said
improvements.
~. The project will be funded from future service payments in lieu of taxes as a result of the Tax
Increment Financing Agreement that will be executed between the City, Ruscilli, Gordon
Flesh, and Midwestern Auto Group. The City has also entered into an Amended Income Tax
^~* Revenue Sharing Agreement with the Dublin City School District whereby the City is not
,~, required to share income tax revenue generated from the development.
Status
• Design is being completed.
• Construction is scheduled to begin in August, 1997.
,i
08/11/97
ar T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-25
i
~~.
19. Radio System Improvements
iU!-
~~
Funding that was provided in 1997 is being utilized to install voter/receivers at the ~"
Smnmitview water tower to improve the coverage of the existing four channel conventional ~~
system. The equipment being purchased is compatible with the goal of "franking" the radio
system. The funds programmed for 2000 and 2001 will allow the addition of franking 800 ""~
MHZ radio equipment. The radio system is utilized by the entire City. "`
08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
~w~
,.~
~:
4-26
..... .._ ....__ ....__ . .....a ,..w'=.. _. ~ _.,_...n._ - .mow m-.w 'iafiNYiWI._.,__.. ...,v ._..,d..
Y~R
20. Community Recreation Center Expansion
One of City Council's 1998 goals that was established during the goal setting workshop in
"~ March 1997 was to begin the process for expansion of the Community Recreation Center
(CRC). The Administration was directed to begin the process of evaluating and
programming the elements to be included in the expansion, establishing a financing plan and
a time schedule for the expansion, and complete design work. Based on this direction,
$400,000 has been programmed in 1998 for planning and design costs and $4.5 million has
been, for planning purposes, programmed in 1999 for construction.
~"" 08/11/97
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-27
21. Parkwood Drive
This project is included as part of the description for the Woerner-Temple/Rings Road ~
Connector project. It will be completed in conjunction with the Woerner-Temple/Rings
Road Connector project; however, it is shown as a separate project due to the fact the project
will be funded through the Thomas/Kohler TIF Fund. r~
.~,
08/1197
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
~r
s
..~~-
4-28
y, m,
,pl.'N
22. Emerald Parkway-Sawmill to Hard
!iNNR
~u~~ As part of the 1995 Schottenstein rezoning, the City is committed to reimburse the developer
the difference between constructing afour-lane boulevard and athree-lane roadway. The
project is contingent upon the development of the site included in the rezoning. The City's
contribution is required when the project is completed. The project has been designed, but
-~- no time frame has been established for construction.
.~~ The funds have been programmed for the construction to occur in 1998 to ensure funds are
~., available in the event the project is completed.
~,
~~
~.
~..~
,~ o8it v9~
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-29
23. Avery Muirfield Drive/U S 33 Interchange Improvements
This project involves the modification of the Avery-Muirfield Drive interchange, including
deck widening and ramp widening; the widening ofAvery-Muirfield from the interchange
to Perimeter Drive, adding one lane in each direction; adding a lane from Perimeter Drive
to Post Road; and installing a closed loop signal system. Funds have been programmed for
design in 1998 and construction in 2000.
It is currently anticipated that long-term debt will be issued for the construction. The funding
for this project will continue to be evaluated as part of future updates to the City's Capital
Improvements Program.
osn I i~~
T: \P ER\DKP\98-C I P\2002.
~F
~...
..~
r.
4-30
~..
"~ 24. Rings Road Improvements
This project provides for improvements to Rings Road, including the construction of a four-
lane boulevard with curb and gutter,., bikeway, sidewalk, and street lights to align with the
~. Woerner TempleJRings Road connector project. It also includes signalization at the
~„ intersection of Rings Road and Blazer Parkway, the modification of the median on Blazer
Parkway and signalization at the intersection of Blazer Parkway and Park Center Circle.
.,T~ This project will be funded by service payments in lieu of taxes to be received as the result
of a Tax Increment Financing Agreement that will be entered into with Duke. The TIF will
be anon-school district TIF resulting in reimbursement period of approximately 17 to 20
~"' years.
~.
o8i1 v9~
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
nror
4-31
25. Emerald Parkway Extension -Perimeter Drive Extended to Shier Rings Road
This public improvement consists of constructing an additional 2,300 foot section of
Coffinan Road as new four lane boulevard street beginning at Perimeter Drive and ending
at Shier Rings Road.
Major improvements associated with this new street include: anew intersection at Shier
Rings Road with turn lanes and signalization; a four lane boulevard street with curb and ,,,~.
gutter; a 330 foot span, five lane bridge over U.S. 33/S.R. 161; landscaped median and
shoulders; public utilities which include; sidewalks and bikeways. ~: -f3
In addition, this improvement includes planning, traffic studies, design, surveying,
geotechnical investigations, noise analysis, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and
sediment control, right-of--way and easement acquisition, right-of--way plat, private utility
coordination, and other activities necessary and appurtenant to the completion of this project.
Design and right-of--way acquisition for this project is scheduled for 2001 and will be
financed using cash reserves. The construction of the project is not scheduled as part of the
five-year program period.
~>
~.,,.
osn v~~
T:\PER\DKP\98-C IP\2002.
4-32
.»
~ :..
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FUNDED PROJECTS
Total ° Debt Debt
Project Already to be Project Funding
r.,~+ Incurrarl Inrurred Source Amount
1 „ .,,,,
Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor
24,605,439
20,755,439
Ohio EPA loan (1) 20,755,439
Credit Enhancement 850,000
Ci of Columbus 3,000,000
2 R. 161-Dale to Sawmill
S 9,411,099 Cash 3,110,379
. Federal\State funds 6,300,720
3 Scioto Bridge 11,905,000 7,500,000 Cash 4,405,000
Voted G.O. bonds 7,500,000
4 Coffman Road widening and Emerald 6,332,210 Cash 1,513,210
Parkway extension to Perimeter TIF service pymts. 2,448,000
LTIP fundin 2,371,000
5 Frantz/SR 161 upgrade 4,586,718 cash 1,876,094
Issue II fundin 2,710,624
6 Cosgray Park development 3,216,967 Cash 2,841,967
Washin ton Tw 375,000
7 Coffman Park redevelopment 2,441,415 Cash 2,441,415
8 Emerald Parkway-Coffman Road 9,970,739 TIF service payments 9,970,739
to Dublin Road
9 Avery Road/US 33/ Shier Rings 1,s33,ooo Cash 743,000
intersection im rovements Franklin County 1,090,000
10 Emerald Parkway-Phase 3 5,270,666 Cash 2,635,333
TIF service mts. 2,635,333
11 Emerald Parkway-Phase 4 866,000 Cash 413,000
TIF service a ments 453,000
12 Post Road/I-270 overpass widening 3,414,000 Cash 3,414,000
13 Woerner-Temple/Rings connector 6,766,574 Cash(2) 1,566,574
4,835,500 Voted G.O. bonds(2) 4,835,500
Develo er contribution 364,500
14 N.E. Quad Park 2,245,000 cash 2,245,000
15 Rings Road/I-270 overpass widening 3,413,000 Cash 2,913,000
State fundin 500,000
16 Tuttle Crossing widening 4,610,000 cash 1,610,000
Franklin Count 3,000,000
17 Krier Drive connection 885,000 Cash 885,000
18 Venture Drive 1,500,000 TIF service payments 1,500,000
(1) For budgeting purposes, 50% of debt retired using income taxes and 50% from sewer revenues.
(2) From income tax revenues generated from development on Thomas/Kohler site.
08/11 /97
4-33
rilenamc 1:11r.a\m~,ry`9S02cir~~o::::ip
i
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FUNDED PROJECTS
Total Debt Debt
Project Already to be Project Funding
Proiect Cost Incurred Incurred Snnrre Amnnnt
19 Radio system improvements 1,670,000 cash 1,s7o,oo0
20 Community Recreation Center
ex ansion 4,920,000
4 500 000 Cash 420,000
Voted G.O. bonds 4 500 000
21 Parkwood Drive soo,ooo cash 400,000
TIF service a ments 400 000
22 Emerald Parkway-Sawmill Road to
Hard Road 900,000 Cash 900,000
23 Avery Road/US 33 interchange
im rovements 7,700,000
7 000 000 cash 700,000
Voted G.O. bonds 7 000 000
24 Rings Road improvements 3,000,000 TIF service payments 2,700,000
Franklin Count 300 000
25 Emerald Parkway extension- Perimeter
Drive to Shier Rin s Road 1,115,000
315 000 Cash soo,ooo
Voted G.O. bonds 315 000
TOTAL $123,377,827 $315,000 $44,590,939
08/11 /97
4-34
Filename:l:\per\mig\9802cip\reccip
~.,
~,
?I~
~IW
r 1
r 1
O
u
..,~
~.
~, ~
_,~,
~nm '
W
~ L~J
1 1 ~
. .
U
W ~ o
E ~V1
~~
`•~ N
~ '~'` ~ ~ ~
~Q~j~oo
w ~
F
~ W ~:-~ ~.,,~ ~
~Q§o~
F 9
V
~~ ~
a
0
Q
O
w
b
c
ou
.~
a~
Q
X
~--~
N
Oi
C
N
N
7
X
F"'
N
Q
~1
'~
a~i
a~
U
0
O
M
O
C
O
.y
.~
C
O
U
L
a
0
A
0
.~-i
i
b
Q~
U
O
f-iw
a~
Q
O
b
0 0
N
~ry
~ ~
~ ~
~ 8
~
Q
a a.
w ~,
O v
F"
4-35
~w
.•
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
RESOURCE DOCUMENTS
1. 1997 City of Dublin Operating Budget
2. 1997 - 2002 City of Dublin Capital Improvements Program
3. 1995 City of Dublin Thoroughfare Plan (Revised '97) `~
4. 1993 City of Dublin SW Area Plan ""'"""`
5. 1987 City of Dublin Community Plan
6. 1997 City of Dublin Facility Master Plan: Final Review Draft `""""
7. 1996 Dublin Community Plan: Existing Conditions Report
8. Dublin Community Plan: Preferred Scenario ,
9. 1997 Area Plans:
, Avery Road
• Civic Center ~
• Old Dublin
• O'Shaughnessy Hills
• Metro Park NW "`
• 161/33 Edge Plan
• Tuller Road
10. Memorandum Report: Barton/Aschman Traffic Study (Pizzuti -Tax Increment Financing "~
Agreement, Metro Center) ~,:
11. '90 - '97 Council Adopted Goals and '98 Parking Lot Items
12. Capital Improvements Program 1998 - 2002: Summary of Projects by Department
13. Steve Smith Land Acquisition Memo (5/2/97)
14. Amy Goldstein Pending Land Acquisition Activity Memo (5/9/97)
15. Barton/Aschman Thoroughfare Plan Cost Estimates (4/1/97)
16. Capital Improvements Program Information for 1998 - 2002 ""°'' '"
17. Traffic Signal Warrant Studies & Summary (12/4/96)
18. 1995 & 1996 Ashland Inducement Agreements ""'~'"
19. Commitment Letter to OCLC
20. Thomas/Kohler: Tax Increment Financing and Economic Development Agreement "~
21. Innovation Drive: Amendment to Tax Increment Financing and Economic Development ~
Agreement
22. Cardinal Health & Cellular One: Tax Increment Financing and Economic Development .~
Agreement
23. M.A.G./Gordon Flesch: Tax Increment Financing and Economic Development
Agreement
24. Rings Road: Tax Increment Financing and Economic Development Agreement ""'
25. 1996 Community Plan: Visioning Process Report ~ +•~
26. The Dublin Community Planning Survey, March 1996: Saperstein Assoc. Inc.
27. City of Dublin R & E Summary Report ~
28. Economic Development Strategy: City of Dublin, Final Draft, March 11, 1994; Mt. Auburn
& Assoc.
29. A Conference/Convention Center Analysis in the City of Dublin, Ohio; Danter Co.
.~
oBil I i9~
T:\PER\DKP\98-CIP\2002.
4-36
err
w~
irr
~.
a.r+
as
+..•'
.,
~r
"~
:~,
1998-2002
;~ FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
VOTED DEBT AUTHORITY
~. As outlined in previous CIP documents, the City received voter approval in the spring and fall of
1990 to issue voted debt for transportation improvements, parkland acquisition, municipal facilities
.A construction expansion and construction of a community recreation center. In effect, these bond
~"' issues all dealt with giving the City the capacity to incur additional debt, for certain types of public
•~ improvements, which would exceed statutorily established non-voted debt limits.
-~ In May 1990, voted debt authority was approved for $34 million in transportation improvements,
~• $7 million in municipal facilities construction/expansion projects, including a Justice Center, and
$4.5 million in parkland acquisition. In November 1990, voted debt authority was approved for
$11.5 million for the construction of a community recreation center.
The previous CIPs outlined several factors which were emphasized during the bond issue campaigns
that were critical to the bond issues. It is important to include those factors in this year's CIP to
provide continued clarity in regard to those bond issues.
As stated repeatedly at the public meetings and within the literature, the bond issues
simply enabled the City to incur increased debt to perform specified types of public
improvements. It clearly did not require that the City perform every capital
improvement which had been mentioned as part of the transportation, parks,
municipal facilities or community recreation center issues. When asked at the public
meetings how the City could insure it would be able to afford all of the projects
identified, we indicated to the public that the City was preparing afive-year capital
improvements program, and that it would only perform those projects that it had the
financial capability to perform. The voted bond issues simply removed one of the
statutory limitations; that being the ten-mill limit. Obviously, the other main variable
which affects our ability to perform these projects, is the revenue which is available
to pay for them.
It is clearly City Council's obligation to evaluate all of the City's capital needs and
choose those projects which need to be funded within the next five years based upon
identified priorities and adopted goals and objectives.
The bond packages which were approved did not represent a referendum of which
projects should and should not be performed by the City over the next five years.
The City did not list every conceivable public improvement which could be
performed, describe the merits of each project, and ask the voters to prioritize them
accordingly. The projects were largely illustrative based upon typical needs
identified at the time.
08/11/97
t:\per\dkp\98-cip\2002 5-1
• Although the voted issues did not constitute. a referendum on all of our capital needs,
there was a significant variation in the expressed voter support for the various
functional areas of public improvements. Of those issues subject to this public
review, transportation improvements received, by far, the highest level of voter
approval when compared to the other categories of public improvements. This is
consistent with the results of the community-wide surveys which were completed as
part of the City's Community Plan in 1987 and the Community Plan update project
in March 1996. Transportation improvements were also reaffirmed as a priority
during a survey conducted as part of the preparation in developing an economic
development strategy. The categories of public improvement needs as reflected in
voting pattern, for the bond issue, received the following voter approval:
Transportation Improvement .................... 72%
Park Acquisition .............................. 66%
Municipal Facilities/Justice Center ............... 60%
Community Recreation Center .................. 58%
• It was clearly represented to the public that the voted debt would be retired from
income tax revenues and not via increased property taxes. Projects would only be
implemented when it was determined that sufficient funding is available without
increasing property taxes.
As stressed when the issues were presented to the voters, we have completed or initiated those
projects for which adequate funding has been determined available.
The following represents a breakdown of the voted debt authority approved by the voters and debt
issued against that authority:
• Transportation improvements - $34 million in authority was approved and we have
issued $12,020,000, against that authority. Several completed projects and projects
on the CIP funded project list have been transportation related; however, other
sources of revenues have been used, such as cash reserves, tax increment financing,
grants, and cost-sharing with other governmental entities.
• Parkland acquisition - $4.5 million in authority was approved and we have issued
$1,225,000 against that authority. The CIP project list does not include any specific
parkland acquisition. The City also has a Parkland Acquisition Fund which can only
be utilized for the acquisition of recreational facility sites, open space and/or
parkland. From the Parkland Acquisition Fund, the City recently purchased a 2.2
acre site near Shawan Falls in an effort to preserve the area. In the near future, the
City will purchase a 12 acre site along the Scioto River for development of a
community-scale park, again utilizing resources from Parkland Acquisition Fund.
08/11/97
t:\per\dkp\98-cip\2002 5 -2
}~ Municipal facilities - $7 million in debt authority was approved by the voters, and we
~"' have issued $5,290,000 in debt against that authority. We have $1,710,000 in voted
~• authority remaining. The voted debt issued was for land acquisition for the Dublin
Justice Center site and the construction of the facility. We also used a portion of our
available cash reserves for this project, thereby reducing the amount of long-term
~" debt that was issued.
• Community Recreation Center - $11.5 million in authority was approved and we
~` have issued $7.5 million against this authority. The CIP funded project list includes
°' an expansion of the facility. The expansion is anticipated to use the remaining voted
authority.
....
"* The voted authority received when the voters approved these issues expired January 1, 1996.
~„ Section 133.18(I)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code states in part "No securities authorized at an election
under this section may be initially issued after the first day of the sixth January following the
~"' election." This means our authority to issue "new" debt expired on January 1, 1996. Bonds would
not have to be issued by that date, but bond anticipation notes would need to be issued.
However, Section 133.18 (I)(5) of the Ohio Revised Code states "The limitations of divisions (I) (1)
~' and (2) of this section do not apply to any securities authorized at an election under this section if
at least ten percent of the principal amount of the securities, including anticipatory securities,
authorized has theretofore been issued, or if the securities are to be issued for the purpose of
participating in any federally or state-assisted program." This code section allows our unused voted
debt authority as of January 1, 1996 to remain available as long as at least ten percent of the amount
authorized, by category, has been issued.
Our past Five-Year CIPs have taken Section 133.18 (I)(5) of the Ohio Revised Code into
;~„ consideration. At January 1, 1996, at least ten percent of the principal, for each category of voted
authority had been issued. This allows the unused portion of the voted authority to remain available
~'" for future years.
As previously stated, the voted debt authority was obtained to reduce the effect of the "ten-mill
limit." At December 31, 1996, the taxing district with the highest required tax rate in mills to retire
`~' current debt outstanding was 3.3003. We feel this millage does not adversely affect the financial
__ health of the City or any of the overlapping jurisdictions.
08/11/97
T:\per\dkp\98-cip\2002 5-3
+~r
e
,~
rr
~.
~,•
,~`
~r
w
~`
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVllEBT NTS PROGRAM
MUNICIPAL
~,~
,.
~.
~.
~.
~.
~.
ides information on the long-term debt obligations lation odf the long term debt
This section prov ported debt, a calcu
1996, the projected long-term income tax su p
capacity and a recap of the annual debt service obligations. in at the end
' ted Long-Term Debt Schedule reflects that the estimaThe schedule also assumes the 50
The Pro~ec
of each year is within the recommended maximum amoun .
subsid for the Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor as discussed in Section
percent income tax Y
3.
' e Pa ments Due schedule reflects that the total actual ~ enue available for debt
The Debt Servlc Y ro ected income tax
obligations each year are within the actual and p ~ lus", will be used to "buy down" other
retirement. The difference eeless debt o be~used to'fund other capital projects.
capital project costs and issu
osi~ ii9~
T:\pcr\dkp\98-ClP\2002
6-1
a
;~
1998-2002
~` FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
,, MUNICIPAL DEBT
This section provides information on the long-term debt obligations outstanding at December 31,
"" 1996, the projected long-term income tax supported debt, a calculation of the long-term debt
~„ capacity and a recap of the annual debt service obligations.
The Projected Long-Term Debt Schedule reflects that the estimated principal outstanding at the end
"'"" of each year is within the recommended maximum amount. The schedule also assumes the 50
percent income tax subsidy for the Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor as discussed in Section
~.
3.
~. The Debt Service Payments Due schedule reflects that the total actual and estimated debt service
obligations each year are within the actual and projected income tax revenue available for debt
~" retirement. The difference between the two, or the "surplus", will be used to "buy down" other
~" capital project costs and issue less debt or be used to fund other capital projects.
osi~ v9~
T:\pcr\dkp\9s-CIP\2002
6-1
r~ ~>
1998-2002
FIVE-YEAR CA PITAL IMPROVEMENTS PR OGRAM ~,
LONG-TE RM DEBT OBLIGATIONS
As of December 31, 1996 r;
Date Paid From Income Taxes ~~
of Original O/S General Capital Other
Unvoted G.O. Bonds Issue Amount Principal Fund Imp. Fund Sources(1) ~'
#1 Sewer 11-01-75 $200,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000 VIII
Coffman-Sawmill Waterline 0415-78 509,405 50,700 50,700 0 0
Old Dublin Waterline 12-01-79 487,249 103,249 0 0 103,249 '~+
Water Tower Construction 05-01-83 859,000 305,000 305,000 0 ~
Post Road Waterline 05-01-83 575,000 210,000 210,000 0 ~.
FrantzJPost/331mprovements OS-01-83 545,000 190,000 190,000 0
Glick Road Improvements 11-01-85 200,000 100,000 100,000 0
Frantr Rd. Blvd. 11-01-85 590,000 300,000 300,000 0 `G'
Avery Road Waterline 11-01-85 383,000 200,000 0 0 200,000
~~
Municipal Bldg. Expansion 11-01-85 800,000 400,000 400,000 0 0
Water TowerConstuction 12-01-90 2,200,000 1,755,000 0 1,755,000 0 ~~
Swimming Pool Construction 12-01-90 1,200,000 940,000 0 940,000 0
Water Systemlmprovements 12-01-90 1,550,000 1,230,000 0 1,230,000 0
Frantz Road Improvements 12-01-90 455,000 395,000 0 395,000 0
Service Complex 12-01-90 2,400,000 1,915,000 0 1,915,000 0
~~
Sanitary Sewer Lift Station 12-01-90 1,800,000 1,395,000 0 1,395,000 0
Rings/Blazer Water Tower 10-15-94 4,100,000 3,855,000 0 0 3,855,000
Rings/Blazer Water Tower 10-15-94 40,000 35,000 0 0 35,000
Total 13,428,949 1,555,700 7,630,000 4,243,249 wa
Unvoted Special Assessment Bonds
Riverforest Waterline 10-03-77 181,950 15,000 0 0 15,000
Coffman-Sawmill Waterline 0415-78 143,678 14,300 0 0 14,300 ire
Old Dublin Waterline 12-01-79 312,751 56,751 0 0 56,751
Phase II Sewer 07-01-81 400,000 100,000 0 0 100,000
Shier-Rings Waterline 09-01-87 95,623 55,000 0 0 55,000
Dublin Village Center Lighting 10-01-92 165,000 125,000 0 0 125,000 ~~
Total 366,051 0 0 366,051
Voted G.O. Bonds
#1 Sewer 12-01-74 100,000 27,000 0 0 27,000
#2 Sewer 07-01-79 225,000 105,000 0 0 105,000 ~'
Coffman Road Extension 12-01-90 315,000 265,000 0 265,000 0
Justice Center(Land) 12-01-90 890,000 725,000 0 725,000 0 ~Iw
N.E. Quadrant Parkland Acq. 12-01-90 1,225,000 960,000 0 960,000 0
Dublin Justice Center 10-02-92 ~ 4,100,000 3,460,000 0 3,460,000
Duke Realty TIF 10-15-94 780,000 665,000 0 0 665,0[
Community Recreation Center 02-01-96 6,615,000 6,375,000 0
0 6,375,000
0
635
0 „~;
Metatec TIF 02-01-96 690,000 635,000 ,
Total 13,217,000 0 11,785,000 1,432,000 ~,
Voted Special Assessment Bonds
^w
#1 Sewer 0415-78 652,095 65,000 0 0 65,000
TullerRoad 10-15-94 1,185,000 1,150,000 0 0 1,150,000
~h
1,215,000 0 0 1,215,000
Total Long-term Debt $28,227,000 $1,555,700 $19,415,000 $7,256,300 ~~
(1) "Other Sources" include special assessment collections, real estate property taxes, water system revenues, and service payments in lieu of taxes. .~
08/11 /97 ~s
6-2 ..~
Filename:t:\per\mig\9802cip\curdebt
a
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
rn
rn
~ ~
(,~ J
O~
~ ~
aw
2 ~
Z ~ o~
m J. ~
ll.l ~ O
N
ON d LJ.I -O ~
O ~ ~ N ~
41 ~""' ~ Ll
~ a J ~
Q ~ X
U~ ~
Qw ~ ~
W ~ rn
O
~ Q U ~
C
~_ ~ v
LL.
N O O
M l0 O
N M O
(p oD O
t0 ~ O
M (O O
N N I~
M
69
t0 M O
r OD
to N
0) M
O N
O (O
~ N
M
b9
(O N O
~ ~ O
M 00 O
M M O
D) O O
to l(7 O
~ N N
N ~
O O) In
O O) ~
O O M
o v ao
N VO' O
T
O O O
O O
0 0
O O
N N
M r-
T
b4
O O O
O O
~ ~
r a7
~ O
O) ~--
~3
°o °o 0O
t0 t17 .--
~ D) O
M (O
ER
N V'
O ~
O r
~ ~
N O
~ O
O ~
M ~t
b~? Efl
N N
M O)
N O
(O M
00 O
M a)
lt) O)
r M
In (O
O N
O N
O O
l!7 V
M ~
fA Efl
M ~
l() (O
M ~
M rn
~ M
~ N
~ ~
O ~
O O
o v_
O ~
N ~
~~
O
O
O
O
N
M
O
0
0
V
O)
N
lf)
O)
M
d'
v
N
O
69
O N
~
f`'7
N N c
6
y ~ C
C
C
}I
L Y
~ ~ (Q
C Q,
m ~
C O7
C t+
T
"O N ^
~ _
N
~ ~ N
~ -O
C C ~
H
v' ~
~ ~ ~~
~
O
O
~ ~ .
>, v v
C
O
c •N O L N (
O
m 'c m m m .;. F n
D_ C
~ D_ d ~. O
~ E ~
U 'p~ U U U 'p O O
C O C C C C U ,F
.` L .` .` .` O O O
~ a a a ~
N
U
U N
~
N •p
O
•O N d
T ~ N
3 °' ~
O N
l~II X >
m
~ Y
L
~ N ~
ui o~~
U U O lII
Qj
C O U
C C
N
U
~ L ~
~ N d7~ 7
C
N ~
"O N
~ ~
C ~
N
"° '° N ~
y =
c0 ~,~.. Q..~ X
~ ~ f9
++
U°' ~
.oE
(0 a p N = O
co c M ~_
~1 o •-
r ~ O C O .C f6 ~
O
M O ~ •N O
N +-~ U
~ N L
O
O
C C O
r .
O
Q
p •~ ~
O
N U N N r ~ ~ y
N (Q
O
O N ~ ~~ V
i
tnL E
~O'O yU.. Y O
Y C C C
C Q U O
~~ L
.
~ _ N ~
C `'
'C
U ul F-
=L N
a
O
L
O,
N U C O
`
?~ +-, y
O
L
7~ C~ 0 }' ~'' C
-° C C O
~Y
O C (Q W O~ C
~' ~~ M C E O ,M,
O
c °-
+~ o a~
L~ ~~~ U M v
.a 7 N
'O N N~~~ (n N U N
N O 0 0 ~
y L ,C a~
~
N 0 ~ ~ 0
,4; ~ IA 'V 'C j N
N N ~ m Y C> N
~ aL+
(6 N
~ ~
d7
C
~ ~ ` O _
n
c
C ~
O
o }, C
'
co3a'c
i°> cvyv
O U ~~~ U Q N~~ y
"° C O a) O N N L O N
~ a~rno 0
g t r N N ~
m
- f- ~
~ ,
~ N
.~ ~
O
Z ~
O
6-3
N
i
a
'U
O
ro
m
m
.~
a
E
d
OO~lAOOMln~apOOOOOO O 00 O --
' ~Q)tp(00)rOr(pI~MOOOO tt N i~
O)Q)~(flM(DLna0MN~OOOO 1n O M
N ~ ~ ~ O N O o0 aD ~ (O CO O ~ a0 M In ~ (O
O cOO~N~Ot!•)NI~O(O V"~tOtnN LL~ O M
O r r Nr rM(01~1~(O'~7 ~ O ~
N ~ V' V' ~ ill
;;
COOtnO0aOO0MMOOOOO I~ 1~ O
~t1~O(O'd•Ma0 V'V'N(0OO 0
~tnr0)lnr~t~0)(0OO0 O 0
(O ~!'
O V•
~t
r ~ M V~ ~ m O O) ~~ ~ O) O lD M r ~ N ,..
O 0)OMV'OlnNaOOl~ctd•O N ~ O) lfl
O
N r r r N r r' M CO f~ l~ V'
~ O)
M ~
• O)
~
~
~ AI
a0OlnOO00O0MMOOOOO
I~
(O
p Yi
d'O)aD~70OI~V'N(ON(0O0 O
WO~N~~V'(OV:~tV_OO O N
M a0
O In
I~
iA
O hf~00M(O~-O V 00(O~Ot!) M ao a0 6)
O Q)OM~•r(OMa0O1~tf V'O N IA O r
N r r r N r r M (O I~ 1~ V' O ~ CO
~
u
~) M ~t
Q
aOtnlf)OOMt(~lnaDOOOOOO 0) ~ ~
~LnQ)OrMODt[)NOI~O (O ~• ~
tl
rlnptnl!)OMrtm'7~to M In r
p VON V'('7(0.-1~r-0~0 O ~ N
~ O r ~f V' N (O M a0 r a0 V' Cr
N r r N r r M (O I` aD
a0
p
~
~ r EA CV `7 r N
~
~ it
U
~ CD 11~lnOOM~~aDOOOOOO
InM
' O
I~ O
O r
N
Q. M
'~t(OMMMOO~
Mp M~tMNONM00M M r ~ fl
M OMI~-OONI~OlnMO O (O ~
~
W ~ rrsf~Ml~NOraOR
N r r N r r M CO ~ VM• N
if
W `- EA N ~ N
Q ~
w to N
Z
O aoo~n~noaoinocho~noooo rn o r
i
~ ~NO~t~a0r0)ONN
~M(OMOM(0O(OMI~ ap
V O
O r
~ f1
Nd
O ~ } 1~ (p r r r l~ l~ l~ (V o0 r (O
' a0 tf) (O
O
NJ d O
O rrln d•Mf~N OraO V
Nrr Nr rM(O O
N M
r ~
~?
rn Q W ~ N ~ ~_
rn ~ U mss" *~.
V~ a0 O lf) In O a0 In O M O~ 0 0 0 0 00 00 O
W
Q' (n V N O V' V N r 01 O N O
C I~ N t.C) p r V' t(') O O O (O
O OD
I~ N
a0
~f
Q~ (O ~rf~Nln~cOC4MV I~
a0 N O)
~ In N
N (O
~ m ~ r M `
7
N r r~ N O a
D ~ ~.
W 0 r 69 N M ~ u
~ m
c_
ai
~ -o
C
N ~
7 to N
•
N
w -O ~ N
p_,
~
_ •C
L UI •++
C N U
C
_ ~ Y L1
r
O C w C r O N L C O
N O _
O
O
O
C w+
6 U N C
O r~ C
3
~ N
lQ
j Q
O
Z
N
(
a)
• a)
~'
N
Ll O
•~' C J O O N C Cl ~
o U E a~ J W m
~°~ C ~ ~ N .O
~' ~ C
•
n
Y U o
~
p ~ ~! ` a) ?i U > a)
'
E n
U a~
> C
O ro ~
Y
O N O
' 3 N Y a y 2
O ~ ~ N~ N
V/ LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VJ ~ LL = ~ N ~ Y Y
~ ~c
~ a~ .O w ~ O ~ U ~ N ~ ~` ~ E Y ~ U N n' ~_
C
W
•
(U ~ c4 t`9 N N O j
U > 0 0
j 0 O- U N
~ a) ~ N O M
(n > lL C4 (A U ~ Z ~ U ~ lA Q U F- ~
° ~ Z O
6-4
w
a
~w
~..
~.r
~'
'~" 1998-2002
,~, FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
NON-MAJOR PROJECT FUNDING
Guidelines have been established for several key functional categories which the Administration has utilized
in projecting the non-major capital needs. These are summarized as follows:
Park Development
• The neighborhood park development priority is based upon the timing of subdivision build-out.
• Evaluate the adequacy of active/athletic facilities in the community and the neighborhood parks.
• Identify opportunities to develop joint neighborhood and community parks with other governmental
jurisdiction (i.e. Dublin City Schools and Washington Township).
Bikeway System Improvements
• Identify connections and/or additions to the bikeway system which provide an alternate
transportation system linking neighborhoods, community facilities and commercial destinations.
• Bikeways are included as part of the City's major public roadway projects.
• Coordinate local system design with other governmental jurisdictions such as the Mid-Ohio
Regional Planning Commission (MORPC), the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) and
other appropriate regional efforts.
• Identify the connections and/or additions that can be constructed by developers as part of private
development.
Fleet and Equipment Mana eg ment
:~ Replacement Strateav
,,, Fleet replacement is based upon its economic life.
~ Strive to maximize the City's return on its investment.
• Focus maintenance efforts on heavy equipment with a long life expectancy.
• Minimize investment in parts inventory.
• Minimize fleet down time.
O8/ 11 /97
,. T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
7-1
". a i~.
n
Additions of Fleet and Equipment
• Maintain existing service levels in areas of new'growth (public and private).
~~~
• Add to or expand existing service levels.
• Shift a contracted service to an in-house service (i.e. sign shop). ~~
Annual Street Maintenance Program
• Investment for street resurfacing should be based on anticipated life of the asset.
• The establishment of a comprehensive pavement management system will help to ensure acceptable
levels of service in the most cost-effective manner.
• The City will need to evaluate the need to increase pavement maintenance in future years.
Computer Hardware and Software
• Upgrade outdated hardware and software systems to remain functional.
• Coordinate functional and informational requirements across departments and divisions.
As identified, specific budget requests will be included in the annual capital budget and a final review and
evaluation made by City Council as part of the Operating Budget review process.
o8n v~~
T:\per\dkp\98-CIP\2002
~-2
.~
II _ II
~.
0
F-
U
W
O
~..
H
Z
w
W
Zp
J ~'
m ~
~ ~
~ J O
Q O
O ~ N
W ~
_ rn
U U ~
'
N
CO ~
O CO
O O
V' O
00 M
O O
i~ O
~ M
O O d
O
O (fl O ~ N (O v7 1~ 0 O
(p ~' tf') ~ N ~
O O M O O `O 0 0 ~ 0 ~
N O O ~
N N N 00
N ~ a0 0 0 M O 0 0 0 M
CO
O O
CO to
f~ d'
~ 00
N ~
C0 1~
~ ~
f` N
00
(O ~t M d) N
r O~O N 0 ~ 0~0 ~ 0 0 0 0
O O CO I~ ~- 00
r r ~
M ti tf~ tn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O ti 000 N ~ ~ ~ O ~
r r t}'
O ~ t(~ ~ O f` O O O O N
O ti O N t1') OV t!') O O
~- ~ d"
CO
M O
~- O
~ O
f~ ~
f` ~A
M O
to O
0 O O d'
O
N I` (~ 00 ~ 00
~ r ~
O tl~ M O ~ t` 0 0 0 0 0
~
I` O
~ O
00 N ~ ~
O I`
M ~
M I~
CO
r ~ N I`
0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~
~
O O
O N
~(") ~ t
M `
~- tf)
~ ~
O O N O O O O O O O N
O M M
O p ~
H ~
Z W W O ~ (n z r- J
p
W
~
~ _
I- m
-
~
I-
Q
IQ-
Q z W ~ H ~ ~- ~ ~ ~
j Z tS ~ a ~ ~ ~ m
~
Z o
(n
W Q
(n
~
~
W
_ I- Y U H Z W ~ W -
~ Z
- ~ J Z Q ~ O ~ -,
O Q Q O Q ~ Q I- ~- I-
~ W a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
U
W
Q.
O
Z
O
U
N
O
Q
C
O
C
O
Q
C
0
C
cv
co
a
cu
cu
~ ~
~~
.~ o
7-3
~~..W ~ ~ ~...
VJ
U
W
a
F--
Z
W
W
Z >
J ~
ma
D ~ N
~ J O
O
O ~ N
~ 00
O
UU~
O ~ ~ tO N N t~O 0 0 0
~ 01 c0 00 O
N r CO
O O O O
O u i~ ~ N N O 0 0 0
t
C)
~ O CO d0 O
N ~- CO
O ~ 00 O
~
~ O
~ r ~ ~ r
In r r N O
r
M 0 0 0 ~
O N ~
~ ~- N r O
O LL") O O O O tn O
~ O
~ r N r
O O N ~ M
O N M
Ln N M r N
r
O Ln 0 0 ~ 0 0 O
O I~ r ~ N ~ r
~ M CO r I~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
~ rn
~ ~ N
a~
~
r
O ~ N
C N N Q N J
a
o ~ L _ ~ I
-
~ •~ ~
3 ~ L O
~ N
~
~ ~
' ~
~ 3 a
N U ~
~ m U
~ ~ L. ' U C
U
C N
~
= RS C
N N
fa
a ~
Y
E O
N U
~ `
°' C
c
r N r N M r M ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
Q Q 00 CO 00 ~ Q ~
rn rn rn rn
0
O
O
r
C
.~
'~
cif
N
O
.~
N
L
a
ca
L
L
m
C
N
C
O
U
C
7-4
Yes
!I
,rr
LV/
I~
U
W
O
a
E--
Z
W
W
Z
O
J ~
m d
~ ~ O
O
O ~ cV
a o0
rn
UU~
O O
~ ~ N ~ 0
O ~' ~
M r d'
O O O O O
N 0 O
N ~ N d
' 0
O ~ ~
('7 r ~
p 0 0
` M O
I~ N O
O O
~ N ti
O O O O N
~ N ti
s} to 0 0 O
~ N ti
N
~ N N d
' O
O N ~
r
N O O
st ~ O
ti r O
O O O O O
I ~
0
y,. ~Q
C ~ Q
ca o ~-
~E U O
~
= U
~ ~
~E '~
_ ~,
' ~
~ ~ L
i Q
(Q
_
~
~
~_
N N ~ U
~ ~ ~ C
O O
O O ~
ao ao ao 00
rn rn rn rn
0
7-5
~~
~.
~'
~F
U
W
O
a.
Z
W
W
Z ~
O
m ~
~ ~
~ J O
Q O
O ~ N
U U ~
W
~ CD W
U
00~
m
Z N
0 00
W N
m
J N
~ O
O °D
F- ~
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
r
O
O
•--
O
m
~ ~ 64
~ W O
W }
Z
O
H
d
U
W
F-
U
O
~ O O Ln O N O ~ ~ 0 0 0 tn tn ~ 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 a0 0 0 tC> tn CO
M O N O o0 1~ CO CO O t!) I~ O [t ~ O ~ O OO f~ 0 0 CO N tn t~ ~f m
~- f~ M r N r ~- r r r ~- ~- ~ ~- r ~-- ~- r ~f O
~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo o o ~n ~n ao
O 0 0 (p N lf~ l~ ~ M
O r ~-- ~- ~- V' N
~"' N
tn O O IA O N O ~- tl7 0 0 0 ln ~ Ln O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
M In N O 00 ~ (O (O O ~ ti O V V' O V O 00 1~ to
~ I~ M ~ N ~ r .-- .-- .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M
O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 N
~ ~ M
O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
~ ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~ ~ OO
to O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In
N ~ h N N N N O ~-
c- ~ c- CO
lf') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N Ln l1') I!") CO N l1') ~
~- N ~ t~
t () O O t n O N 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M
N ~ M m M N CO ~
O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N
N `
~ M In
~ ~ In O O O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
~ ~ N M O
r
(A U
N C N Y
U O ~`. U
Y
-0 ~ ~ Y
U
L
N
(p
N
~
O (Q
Y
N
Y ~
U ~ W Y .1 ~
'~
c N (6 ~ ,y (4 Y ` ~ ~ N
- L ~
~ J
o
U
~
~
~
~
N
Y
N
`
~
~
~
~
d.
N
~
~
~
~
~
co
~
U _
~
o
O
~
O
c
.O
N
Y
Q
H
(6 0 Y
~ Y Y Y L (6 (9 ~
c fII
W
-o Y
~ (n
~ N
x O Y ~ Z U (Q ~
H
~ c
C ~ ~ ca ~ _ W t ~- N
' ~
,,.,. (6 N (Q ~ (6 ~ c ~ L W
O O N a ~ Y ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q W C J ~ ~ .~ N (n ` d L
~C U (6 0 0 ~ (6 O Y
` ~ O O N U L O C O ~ U` ~ N ~ U
~ - O (6 U A N .a
X (II
3 O
7 .C C L
U N
~ - N L
U y
Y C N ~ O ~
'C C L N
O Y .C
~ N L
~
c
~
~
.a
=
c ._
c
c
~
~
c
~
cv
~
U
c
. ~
c
~
~
in
~
~
c
-
c N
Q [0 F~ O ~ ~S F~ U Q Q ~ 2 ~ ~ (A ~ m ~ U ~ ~ I~ 2 ~ Y ~ Y
~ N ~- ~ N ~ N M ~- N M ~ N M d' L(7 r N ~- N
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
j
Q Q ~ (O (O o0 o0 o0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 •- ~ N N ~
Q rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `
0
E
cII
O
Q.
(B
T
a~
N
L_
C
'O
c ~
O ~
c
Y U
U C
o 'T
~ ~
~ o
~ ~>
C
ac ~
Q W
~~
Yils
~~
7-6
„~
~r
~.
aiYll
a
U
U
W
~.
H
Z
W
W
Z~
O
ma
~ ~
~ - N
~ J O
Q O
O ~ N
~a°O
_ rn
UU~
O O X 0 0 ~- M O O
to 'd' M .- ~ ~'
r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
O O tf> O O ~ M O O
-n st M ~- r- ~
r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 0 0 0 0 N
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 N
O O t n O O ~ M O
r r M e- ~ I~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
~ C
~ ~
o ~ ~ o
L
3 ~
~' .N
N :~ C
~ a~
~
r
c
c
•
o
0 ~
o
J
~ ~ 7 ~
' N Q
E ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ cn ~
'
~ _ `
~° ~= o o N C ~
V _
' N •
~ ~
L '~
•~ ~
~ .~+ LL O
~
~
N
~. ~ 1
N
~
~
N
~ ~
Q a~ ~
~ p
c o ~ W
U U J U ~
U
W
O
~
a
~
O
Z
W
O
a
i
r-N~NM ~
00000 p>
00 00 ~ ~ ~ r
rnrnrnrnrn `
0
7-7
~¢
+. :,t
J W j yr ~ ate,
H
U
W
O
a
~-
Z
W
W
O
a
Q°o
~ N
d ~
U~
~ m W
(~
O0o
m
D
Z
Oo
~°
W N
m
J N
~ O
O °O
H O
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
r
O
O
O
r
O
O
r
~ ~ O
OQo
d } ~
Z U
W W
z00
d
Z
O
U H
wa
~ U
a ~
W
H
U
~O
~ Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M
N N
0
~ 0 0 0 0 O ~
~
N N
O O O
~ ~
~ O O
~ O O
~
N I~
O ~ ~
~ ~
~ O O
`
O
c
~N
.
~
a~
° o Q
~ ~ o
~
~
0
m ~
c ~
CII ~
cn U
c
0
m
U
O
«s
m
•- ~
o ti
~ c
c
'
O .-- Q
~ ~
0 Q
Q
7-8
~!
.~.
~.
l.1
uYll
:$A
rxcn
k..,,,
~e
U
W
d
F-
Z
W
W
z~
J ~
C0 0,•
~ N
~ J O
O ~ oND
d
O
UU~
0 0 L n 0 0 0 O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O l (') O O M
O
(Op M N N O
N O I
~ ~ O
A O l
N n
N 0
V' 0 c 0
N l O I
t) ~
~ N
N I ~
~ O
~ N ~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O~ O ~
O Cn
N I ~ O
N
00 t
C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 «') O O M
tOp .
M N N
N
tOn
~
~
N
N
R
O
~
.~-
N
(O
l(7
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~
M
r r
O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O M 0 0 O
N ti ~ r ~ ~ CO
~ T
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l n 0 0 O
N
r
r ti ` r M ~'
~
O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ O O O O O M
N ` ` O
~ ~ O
O
r `-
N O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O ~
~ ~ ~ N N u ~ ~ N N ~ O
N
1~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
~ ~ M N t1.1 (O N M M t(')
0
0 a
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
~ N N N
C C O O N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ O
am'
E ~ = a °' E g c
i o JJ N ~ p U
(A c m :~ (n
p E
• E ~
-
~°
•-
C E
~ ~
N
C c
~ c
'
- c
•N >
o m
'O •n
p ~
~ a~
~
~ d
a
N p
cA m
~ o
N m
N
~
O ~ N LL C a
i
... O C
O E ~ ~ j N L 0 N N
•>_ j •>_ •> J
~ c ~ ~ °~ c r a V ~ c ~ ~ ~ ap`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O
_ N '- - y ~ O (n O C U C ~ ~. E C N '~O "00 "O 'O V • ~~"
~ o '~ ~ p ~ .~ ~ m c v ~ (n c `C ~' ~ c `C
a~
m
a~
c ~ c ~ c m ~ ~ ._
~ ~ ~
_Y
~ N o
i
C C ~
'O m
C W
N (n ~
N Y
N d
W J y .~
N C ~
C ~
C ~
(p ~
~' C C C C C
O .
~ C p ~ N O O ~ 0 0 •O 0 0 ~ •O O •O O •O
~ ~_ L `` N c tO C .~ 'p .0 (n U N N N ~ U N N N N N
L C C d O C ~ E ~ _O m C ~ L C C C ~ ~ C C C C C
C Q Q fn Q (n N F- J ~ ~ ~ ~ (n (n U1 (~ (n ~ fA (n (A CA (n
~
0 N
0 M
0 ~
0 N
0 M
0 ~
0 ~
0 (O
0 I~
0 ~-
0 N
0 M
0 V'
0 lf')
0 (O
0 ~
0 N
0 M
0 ~
0 ~-
0 ~
0 I~
O
Q Q Q I~ i~ I~ I~ h f~ l~ a0 a0 00 aD a0 a0 O O rn O O ~ ~
O) 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0) 0 0 0 \
O
0
7-9
C
7
O
U
N
N
C
.~
7
.D
'O
C
(0
V1
7
7
O
U
~, o
7
~U
(C6 C
~ ~
O
api~U
a. U
a~m~
L ~
~ ~
"- c
° m o
o ~ L
~°LaiO
Q Q O
w i N
~ C
C ~ ~
'v
c c m L
O w ~'
~ 3
U ~ Y U
O ~ C N
~ ~ 'p O
l6 ~ N a
7 O ~ a•+
C ~ C
C ~ U O
fOQ C"7
~vNM
U
H
U
W
O
Z
W
W`
Z /
J LL
ma
~~
~ - N
~ J O
O
O ~ N
~Qrn
U U r-
0 0 0 0 0 0
M
N ~
O O O O
O N O O O O
`
M N ~
O O O O
~ `
O O O O
` `
O O O O
` `
O O O O
` `
O O O
N `
M M
O O ~ ~
M M
O
N
N
3
0
N ~ c
~ .N
~
O 3 ~ J
¢
o ~ !
-
N O
N ~ ~ O
3
C O
O clS ~
c
L
0
. ~
~
~
~
C cc
G
^~
F
^+
r
^N
era
~~
r, T ~- ~
OO~ O rra
ti o ~ .-
rn rn r-
eo ws
° 7-10
,~
~~
~,
-,
H
U
W
O
a
H
z
w
w
zp
J ~'
ma
~ ~
~ - N
~ J O
O
O ~ N
a~
rn
UUr'
F-
U
W
O
O
Q
Z
O
z'.
w
I-
w
F--
Q
O
I-
7-11