Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-00 OrdinanceRECORD Of ORDINANCES C Ordinance No .......................80-00............................ Passed .................................................................., ....................... AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR 78.33 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF POST ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET EAST OF HYLAND- CROY ROAD, FROM: U-1, RURAL DISTRICT (JEROME TOWNSHIP CLASSIFICATION), TO: PLR, PLANNED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (CASE NO.00-0572 -THE POST PRESERVE). NOW, THF,REFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, ~~ of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of tl:e Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That .application, Exhibit "B", Including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this (~ h day of /V D (/ . , 2000. M - Pr id` leg O facer est: ~• Clerk of Council Sponsor: Planning Division hereby CG(f`f'~' i'npt i4~t)Di5 Q~ 1f'iS Di:.~~!)Q~:?~~ f~'~.~:Sflil3~tQ~ E'tnie hfl`f2(~ ±'? ~ItP Cifiy of Q:iu?in Sn aesar,crete vr,t>a Sectifln ??1.25 o~ #i~e 1°~r Revised rode. ~~~~~ ~~yy ~~~ fle of Council, Dublin, Ohio ~, le~xRe ~..- ~ , ~`~" SCALE: 1IN EQU LS 1244FT ~ ~ g g ~A s ~, ~ '"~ 4 • ~ ,- ~l i F^ ~ ~~$T n ~l y~77O ~ '-~ WWOSOR r W.1~pEM C~ ~. WND~ y (,'T NJ I~' ~u s. ~~` ~ C p g2~ W 3 u a D (~ =-== Z 0~-~57Z ~' ~ Rezoning The Post Preserve CT Q4r~F ~~~ < «~ „„ ._~, ~ ~' d~` W~'l ~~~ ~~~ R ~~\~I R R R 1 ~~ R R 1B ~' ~ - 00-0572 & Rezoning ""~* The Post Preserve • ~'"'~ ',~r~ E CI'Tl' OF D~I3Ll_A REZONING APPLICATION (Code Section 153.234) EXPIRE Ordinance No. Q~ ~~ 58C0 Shier Rings Read _ Dublin, Ohio 43016 City Council 1st Reading FhonelTDD: 614; i 61-6550 Fax: 614/761-6566 City Council Public Hearing City Council Action FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: /DAD. `'° AF•pGcation No: - ~ P&Z Date(s): P&Z Action: Raceipt No: Z N11S Fee No: Date Received: Received B Ty~~e of Re~luc~f: /+ ~~~-~G~ ~ fV l~ ?'1~ ~ ~ s PLE,^,SE SU~N11T TlNO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS - I'IT,:\SI, I'i2[~ l~ - ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION and CHECK Ti1E TYPE OF APPLICATION ^ Composite Plan(Ccda Section 153.OSoj Preliminary Development Plan (Cede Section 153.056) ~ Ctncr(De:;c;ribe) PLR Development Plan DC 153.051 PRGPEP.TY INrORN1AT10N II TAX ID NCI I Paraa Sing z~ ~ ^- II DISTRICT PARCEL NO: See attached list . ~ ~ - ( (Ac:r";:1 ,..1 ~ Prch~ rty A,i~:rss i~ 7180 Post Rd., Dublin, OH 43016 Prcparty La,~~tlcn i I ~ Post Road north side a~nrn~ x_ 75n .~~ts, ~S + N N l f u~,~ a„~ r,-„~~Ptd. i~ .~~ of Str~c~L ( , S. E. W) Ort 1 N~:ar<::a ~ntcrseceon: Post Rd./Hyland Croy Rd. -, Dist•3nco from Neon>st Int~~rsection750~ ,~St N, S , E, W tram N~~arest Inters~ti;ticn ~ Existing Land UseiDr ve~lopmc+nL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~, ~"-. ~ ; . ~)~ Farming -residential `~'~ Prri~;~::ril L,uid U:~:D~w~rlri~m.rnl Residential subdivision and park. ~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ u ~ F ~ ~ ~ 2J~ '~ ~ R:~tcnm~trApi;iic•~ti;;n . PLA 108 C.it~+Oui~i'l9 L - ~ , ~ ~s EXHIBIT "B" i r 1~f 1~ ~, r ~, .,_ ... .. i ~~ -~ EXHIBIT "B" ^ II 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~~ ZC~/ ~ /~ Lc~f+~l description of tho property to be rezoned consists of _~. pag!~(s). .~.~jT PLAN REQUIREMENTS: ^ 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 2a" X 36") SHOWING: a_ The site and all land 500 feet beyond tha boundaries b North arrow and h ar 5cal~t c Emsling condition (Ruarls, huildfng;, vcylrlation,tcl~~:~~.~phy. Iuri~,dictional bound~arius, utlhti~ s: d Pr<~pos~xl Uses (Rrgicnal transportation sysl~ m, dr~nsilirs, d of dwullinys, budding/unit type:. t~ Existing .and proposed zoning disl~ir,l bound3rics R~•z~;nin~l A.{~I~Iic~aiion 1',rr . .d S B-~ FILE ootay~~s, parhlan~L'cpen s~ - ) t ~10~ 6.Ylr II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:. ',, _.._ EXHIBIT "B" f. Size of the site in acres/square feet; and g. All property lines, street rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries. 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11" X 17") 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20") Showing contiguous property ov/ners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area ±o he rezoned. i III. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS ~,»,' ;~ ~~ See attached list of adioinin~ nronPrt~~ nwnPrc ~~.~/~BZ List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. PROPERTY OWNER (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE i i I I FIDE Cr~~ ..y~_ _.~~~,.._ ~ ~ U ... .._. ~'~~e ' ~ R~voninrlAi~hlir,,ilitm P' -108 Dato09/28/99 I~,,.~.,,., ~ ~ ~'~~`~ OF DUB~.l~ ter,. ,:. ~+~ EXHIBIT "B" OPERTY OWNER INFORMATION FR Name of Current Property Owner(s): DCiT[1ri1017 ~~g~ AU7eCt jP2 ~ FlOrelCe ~~~ 'Prvstees, Nortl~st Assanbl of God. tilailing Address: . (Street. City, State, Zip Code) . Daytime Telephone: Fax: }~,~. ~'S`~,f,"` T' Q]Il2 ' , (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): Name of Contact Person `Please camplete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. B~l~lfid~ I't & T'~.111 Mairng Address: 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500 (street, city, stag, zip code} Dublin, OH 43017 ~ Daytime Telephone: Fes- (614 764-0681 ) 7hC~-n77G. E-rt~il_ Which of the above is the primary contact person? Q~isto~r T Cline V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City representative to visit photryraph and pest a notice on the property described in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIh9ER The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and nerthwFSt Fr•,r,.iln County has stretchcrJ the City's capacity to provide these services to the limit As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said fara!i~ ~s a~~.~ilahdi~ to th~~ appaicant until some future date. The ApplicanG'Cvmer heresy ackncw!edges that approval of this request for rezcn,:nq by the Dublin - Fl.,~~r~ ~,~~ arnI Zoning Ccmm~:~sion and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commihnent that the City of Dublin will ire able to pr-..~, ..:.~ •nti.~l _-,on,ices su^h as water and sewer facilities when r,e~~lxi t,y said Applicant. VII. OW~1ER AUTHONIZATICN FOR REPRESENTATIVE ~--- - I -- - I _ See attxhed aaitYnrizatiOns ~~~ j$ j'1" ~ ,t he owner and applicant. hereb~~ authonze to .ct as my ropresenlative and agent in all matters pertaining to the proc;e_ssing and approval of this applicatio n including modifying the projr~a, and I agrae to btu bound by sll representations and agreements made by the desi~tnated agent. igna u e o Current Pro ert ~ nor: Date: ~ om ,~ t , Signature of Current Property Owner: I,I t___ _ Cate: ~~~ ~+.~ ~ra ~7,..,....~.....~.,.U.R-....,.,.,..,.,... ..-..,.. VIII. APPLICANT'SAFFICAVIT =~'~' i5 ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~ ~0- ~'' ~~ F~~~~tnr~irnl Al ,liralion - 03~ Grin. 09/23,rg9 t~r., t , . ~ .ri.,iITY OF DUBLIN s ~,, ~, EXHIBIT "B" STATE OF ~h1.0 COUNTY OF Franklin I, ristopher T C'1 i nP ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the conten±s of this application. The ~nformaticn contair~ed in this appLcat,cn, attached °xh;ihjts and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and co/rre\ct, to the best of my k/no\wledge and belief. Signature of Applicant or / t ~ ~ t n ~ ~ / Date: w Authorized Representative:(\ O! 1 ~,~ f'~--~1 arw.ubscribed and sworn to before me this / Yu ~ day of _~I Notary Public =°~PPtA~ S~9` f~'s MARTHA M. SEIDENSTICKER J . ~ Notary Public, State of Ohio .~~. ~ ''" s ~ o~ My Commission Expires 5i221t10 , , ,, ~ ,. , ~r~_~tn• ~. FI~.E ~~ ~~'~ --~...__ m o ~-~ ~~ ~~T`=` OF DI)~~.I~±~ o,.,,, ~ „~ ~ ~i a-tc3 ova;: a,~:~~ ~xN ~ s~-r s- ~ ZONING DESCRIPTION OF 78.33 ACRES ALONG THE NORHT SIDE OF POST ROAD, IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO *'^ Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, City of Dublin, lying in Virginia I Military Survey 3452, and being 78.33 acres of land comprised of 46.83 acres out of the ~. 51.851 acre tract owned by A. L. and Florence Schoby, 0.03 acres out of the 1.060 acre tract owned by W. R. II and R. D. Syar, and 31.47 acres out of the 46.833 acre tract owned by Northwest Assembly of God, all records herein of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio, and said 78.33 acre of land being bounded and more particularly described as follows; BEGINNING at a point in the centerline of Post Road marking the southwest corner of said 51.851 acre Schoby tract; Thence North 06° 29' 10" West, a distance of 3803.98 feet, along the west line of said 51.851 acre tract, to a point marking the northwest corner of said 51.851 acre tract; Thence North 83° 23' 30" East, a distance of 1111.10 feet, along the north lines of said 51.851 and 46.833 acre tracts, to a point marking the northeast corner of the said 46.833 acre tract; Thence South 06° 04' 02" East, a distance of 2604.88 feet, along the east line of said 46.833 acre tract, to a point; Thence South 83° 43' S3" West, a distance of 582.19 feet, along a line over and across said 46.833 and 51.851 acre tracts, to a point; Thence South 53° 49' 41" West, a distance of 70.00 feet, along a line over and across said 51.851 acre tract, to a point; Thence South 08° 42' 26" West, a distance of 339.81 feet, along a line over and across said 51.851 acre tract, to a point; Thence South 06° 29' 10" East, a distance of 379.66 feet, along a line over and across said 51.851 acre tract, to a point; Thence South 14° 14' 06" East, a distance of 504.13 feet, along a line ov~er~a~4 cross said 51.851 acre tract, to a point; ~ ~~~ ~ ~ _,_~ +c. 15 ~ ,y ~' ~ l~ ~ . ~ ~-o ~ { . ~~ ~~., ~2J~o C ~.;., Thence South 06° 04' 02" East, a distance of 305.75 feet, along a line over and across said 51.851, 46.833, and 1.060 acre tracts, to a point in the south line of said 1.060 acre tract, said line also being the centerline of said Post Road; Thence North 74° 18' 10" West, a distance of 74.88 feet, along the south line of said ""'" 1.060, 46.833, and 51.851acre tracts, said line also being the centerline of said Post Road, to an angle point; Thence North 54° 58' 06" West, a distance of 475.99 feet, continuing along the south line of said 51.851 acre tract, said line also being the centerline of said Post Road, to the point of beginning, containing 78.33 acres, more or less. The above description was prepared from information of record and not an actual survey. P:\5132\SURV EY\DATA\51322-REV.DOC 26 MAY 2000 R. D. ZANDE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE C~~ V _ _ ._ ..~' i:z t ~~0~ ~~ s'4, Z lam. L'~ ~pp / l~ 2 ~~ OF DU~.~~. C List of Adjoining Property Owners IAW DC 153.234(B)(1)(d) and Dublin Charter 4.09(a) (within, contiguous to and across street from property proposed for rezoning) Name Mailing address Columbus Builders Supply, Inc. 807 West Third Avenue, (:olumbus, OH 43212 City of Dublin 5200 Emerald Parkway; Dublin, Oh_4_3017 Casto Post Ltd. ~ 209 East State Street, Columbus, OH 43215 _ ___ tshp: ~ BJL Ltd. P c/o Todd Lane, PO Box 671, London, OH 43140 _ GLK Properties ~~ ~ 7155 Post Road, Dublin, OH 43016 Post Hylands Co, c/o Morrison Law Offices 3220 Riverside Drive, Coiumbus, OH 43221 _ Warren Gordon _ 7270 Hyland Croy Rd, Plain City, OH 43064 slee _ own artha T Jeff and M ~ 7001 Violet_Veil Ct, Dublin, Oh_43016 ______ _ _ _ MI Homes ~ r ~ 3 Easton Oval, #420 Columbus, OH 43219 John and Ari Thompson 7025 Violet Veil Ct, Dublin, Oh 43016 William and 1VIaureen Jenkins 7033 Violet Veil Ct, Dublin, Oh 43016 Mark and Kelly Muresan 3374 Violet Veil Ct, Dublin., Oh 43016 Elizabeth Hannemaii Bernard and Dawn Scheurle 7049 Violet Veil Ct, Dublin, Oh 43016 7065 Violet Veil iCt, Dublin, Oh 43016 GeorgeDavid and Mary Merijill Robert and Jennifer Keating 6710 Wynwrght Dr, Dublin, OH 43016 6694 Wynwright Dr, Dublin, OH 43_016 Donna Jot°dan ~~__ _~_ _ _ Mary Beth Fais ~ _ 6670 Wynwright Dr, Dublin, OH 43016____ _ _ _ _ 6650 Wynwright Dr, Dublin, OH 4301 f Gregory and Susan McCrabb Michael And Michelle Alvarez 6642 Wynwright Dr, Dublin, OH_43016 __ 7421 Pharoah Dr, Dublin, OH 43015 __ Kerry and Annita McClure 7429 Pharoah Dr, Dublin, OH 43016 James Mathews and Lauara ~~ Cunningham 7437 Pharoah Dr, Dublin, OH 43016 _ -Albert and Florence Schoby _ 6233 Post Road, Dublin, OH 430_16 _ __ ~_ William and Rita Diane Syar 7150 Post Road, Dublin OH 430] 6 d Northwest Assembly of Go 70_55 Avery Road, Dublin, OH 43016 _ Chris and Darla Houslca ~ 7017 Violet Veil Court, Dublin, OH 43016_ __ _ ~ Teresa and Daniel Edwards _ 7057 Violet Veil Court, Dublin, OH_43016 F,dward and Lisa. Schwartz 7018 Violet Veil Court, Dublin, OH 43016 _ _ James Stepan _ ~ ~ M 7089 Violet Veil Court, Dublin, OH 43016 _ Arjun and Diane Jayaramen 7097 Violet Veil Court, Dublin, OH 43016 Davidson Phillips 1152 Goodale Blvd dr. Cols, OH 43212-3196 Nick and Heather Byanski 6678 Wynwright Drive, Dublin, OH 43016 Kurt and Michelle Purcell 6658 Wynwright Drive, Dublin, OH 43016 C1 ~ ~.. n o~ ~~~~ ; ~~~`~OIO 4s~ ~ ~ ~; ~~~~ti _.~' ~'. C 0 The Post Preserve Lominion Homes List of Parcel. Numbers of Properties 12.equested for Rezoning List of Addresses of Owners of Parcels Requested for Rezoning 78.33 acres Post Road 1llote: Below parcels are all in Union C'~unty. acreage listed is portion of parcel ~'" included in this rezoning request. ~~z~ner Acreage Map Nut~nber Parcel Nu.~ber I Albert Lee and 46.83 acres (Partial) 14700-00012.000 17-00290 6.000 ~ Florence Schoby, Trustees I I)~minion Homes A3 acres (Partial) 147-00_-00-013,000 1700-29017.100 'Northwest 31.47 acres (Partial) 147-00-00-017.000 17-00-29017000 Assembly of God Mailing Addresses of Property Owners ~ibert Lee and Florence 6233 Post R.o~+.~l Dublin, Ohio 43017 Schoby, Trustees T Dominion Homes Dublin, Ohio 43017 Assembly of God 7055 Avery Road ~ Dublin, Ohio 43017 :: 6r" 4 ' ~? ' 1 S V L5 ii v ._. ~ ~,,, o -~ ~~ao ~~ a CITY OF DUBLIN ... C ~XHIB(( 8-'{ CONSENT TO REZONING OF PROPERTY The undersigned persons are owners of land in Washington/Jerome Township, City of Dublin,Ohio, being located north of Post Road and east of Hyland Croy Road, and comprising in total, about 46.83 acres out of the 78.33 acres presently proposed for rezoning by Dominion Homes, more or less, or such other number as may from time to time be determined by Applicant to be appropriate to achieve approval of the project. Said persons by their signature below consent to allow Dominion Homes. to request that the City of Dublin rezone said property to the Planned Low Density Residential zoning category, or such other residential or park category as Dominion Homes determines is appropriate to accomplish the purposes intended, being a residential community and further to modify the project in such ways as Dominion Homes determines is necessary or appropriate to achieve the stated purpose of this application. Date: `~ Name ~ Albert Lee Schoby, Trustee Florence Schoby, Trustee l~Z. .. __ .. _ ~._~. ,.a ~ ~~ a~ ~ ~J .~.5~ . M AY ~ 1 X00 ~-05~7~ CITY OF DUBLLhI. - C 0 CONSENT TO REZONING OF PROPERTY The undersigned persons are owners of land in Washington/Jerome Township, City of Dublin,Ohio, being located north of Post Road and east of Hyland Croy Road, and comprising in total, about 31.47 acres out of 78.33 acres proposed for rezoning by Dominion Homes, more or less, or such other number as may from time to time be determined by Applicant to be appropriate to achieve approval of the project. Said persons by their signature below consent to allow Dominion Homes. to request that the City of Dublin rezone said property to the Planned Low Density Residential zoning category, or such other residential or park category as Dominion Homes determines is appropriate to accomplish the purposes intended being a residential community and further to modify the project in such ways as Dominion Homes determines is necessary or appropriate to achieve the stated purpcYs~- of` this application. Date: Name Northwest Assembly of God ~// 2~~ by ~o~' h ~-- L1Z THE POST PRESERVE CA5E #00-57Z Dominion Homes 78.803 Acres north of Post Road (1J'nion County) PLDR (DC' 153.051) April 2$, 2000 revised August 24, 2000 revised w/P&7 changes for council action Septe~nnber 22, 2000 ]DEVELOPMENT TEXT S/TE O vF.R ~lE6f~ The 78.803 acre site is on the north side of Post Road about 700 feet east of Hyland Croy Road. The land is in Uniozt County and is newly annexed to the Ciry of Dublin. The site is "P" shaped and deep. The present frontage along Post Road is about 500 feet and the depth is about 3844 feet on the western boundary. About 1200 feet from Post Road the site widens to about 1 ] 00'. The eastern, northern and southern boundaries of the site are in the City of Dublin. The land proposed for rezoning contains portions of two parcels. A table lists the amount taken from each parcel. If the rezoning is approved the parcel bounda;ies will be reconfigured. The two parcels are owned by third parties in contract to sell to Applicant. Along the eastern boundary from Post Road the site is bordered first, by the retained po><"tion of the Northwest Assembly of God site, then briefly by the Red Trabue Nature Preserve, then by the 'Wyndham Village residential neighborhood. Along the north boundary is the approved but not yet built Park Place residential development (which extends westward to Hyland Croy Road). The southern side of Post Road is zoned for offices. To the west, one additional tract of land, about 500+ feet wide, sepazates the site from Hyland Croy Road. That site remains in Jerome Township in Union County in an agricultural category. The reconfiguration of Post Road to a.ccomimodate the new Perimeter Drive '"""" creates a new southern boundary for the site and will provide a small amount of open space usable for a community entry feature. r.w. A) PROPOSrD GOCAT/ONS AND SIZE OF AREAS OF RFSIDENTlAL USE... The 78.803 acre site proposal is composed solely of 145 single family building lots. This yields an overall gross density of about 1.85 dwelling units pcr acre. The PLDR category uses a unique formula to calculate density but this is not commonly used in Dublin today, and that calculation is not included. The single family lots are at least 80 foot fronts at the building line, and a number of lots are larger. This makes the lot sizes at least consistent with, and in some cases larger than, the adjoining residential neighborhoods of Wyndham Village, Park Place. ~- and Lowell Trace. `~ -.' ~ ~ ' ~ .~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ., AS SUBMlTTBD 70 COUNCIL ~'-~ : ~ S~? L G [~u0 ~ ~ - Thc Post Preserve Ucvelopmcnt Tcxt ` --~~ff ; Version of Septembc~ 22, 2000 ~ `~ ~ ~ / `) plc 1 ~ ~ ~ / ~` , The dwelling units will be single family homes from DorrAinion Homes product line, and can be expected to be typical in size and price to the adjoining developed and proposed neighborhoods. B) PROPOSED [.UCATlONS OF NONRESIDGNTIAG PORTIONS of TflE' TRACT... The only non residential portions of the tract are the open space areas. The open space azeas, net of approximately 2 acres of detention/retention, comprise about 23.76 acres and are divided into three areas: the open space along Post Road at the single family entrance, thie open space along the stream which connects to the Red Trabue Nature Preserve, and the area adjacent to and including the woods at the northeast corner of the site. It is planned that these areas will be dedicated to the City as parkland. if t}~e parkland requirennent is determined to be higher than computed by applicant, there is an approximately 13.94 acre surplus between the required parkland (9.82 acres) and the provided parkland (23.76 acres) in which adjustnnents can be made. The parkland provided is not irrespective of the required parkland, ie, the applicant will not be required to give additional pazk above that required by the pazkland ordinance if any relevant calculations change and more pazk area is required. A,s will be stated later in this text, retention detention facilities may also diminish the calculated open space but no case will the net open space be less than required by code. Maintenance of the two northern park areas will be the sole responsibility of the City. The southern, entry feature area along PostlPerimeter will be maintained by the homeowners association. C) PROPOSED PROV/S~ON OF WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND SURFACE DRAINAGE_ 1) Major water and sewer lines are located both along Post Road and in the adjoining developed residential subdivisions_ Design of the servicing of the site by these utilities will be in accord with discussions with the City Engineer. 2) Stormwater retention will be in accord with Dublin Code and will be in several ,,~,,, locations, to suit the natural drainage systems. Required retention/detention capacity in ponds located in park areas will not be used to satisfy parkland dedication requirements, ie, if retention is in the open space azeas, the remaining open space areas not used for retention must be sufficient to satisfy the park dedication requirement. Preliminary stormwater design analysis will be provided at the preliminary plat stage. Location of retention/detention areas will be determined by engineering requirements and usability of the park area to be dedicated. Applicant will work with City officials in determining location of these facilities. 3) After necessary fill, all new individual lots in the single family residential area will be located outside of the 100 year floodplain. Dublin Flood Control Ordinance and Dublin Stormwater Ordinance will be followed. A survey of floodway and 'The Post Preserve Dev~lapetent Tcxt Version of 5ep~ember 22, 200() Pa,c 2 floodplain to FLMA standards has been done and furnished to the City Engineer. The site is not in a FEMA study area, so FEMA is not involved these discussions. 4) All utilities will meet city engineering requirements. D) PROPOSED TRAr•F!C C:~RCUGATlON PATTERNS 1) The site has roadway access to the new Perimeter Drive and to an existing street, Royal Plume Drive, in the Wyndhann 'village subdivision on the eastern boundary. A connection is planned to the proposed Metro Park Place on the north. Additionally, three stubs are provided on the western boundary for future connection to Hyland Croy 12oad. As stated above, Post Road will be reconfigured to intersect with the new Perimeter Drive as shown on the Development Plan. Perimeter Drive to the west of this intersection will in fact replace Post Road. This construction is presently underway. Applicant's proposed access with the new Perimeter Drive has been located midway between the (future) intersection with Post Road to the east and with Hyland Croy Road to the west. This intersection will be accessed through the Gordon parcel to tl~e west See my letter to Mitch Banchefsky dated August 14, 2000 regarding Applicant's commitment to reimburse City for acquisitor costs for this ROW. All right of way widths, pavement widths and roadway geometry will meet city engineering requirer~nents. The site is very well situated for access to Post Road/Perimeter Drive on the north, and, once the connection to Metro Park Place is built, to Hyland Croy Road on the west. This in turn gives immediate access to the freeway interchange at Post Road and US Route 33/SR 161. 2) Traffic Calming Measures. In part because this convenient access will also be available to subdivision traffic using the connections to the west and north, the potential impact from cut through traffic must be considered. The applicant has addressed this issue by designirxg traffic calming features into the initial design of the subdivision. A sepa;ate attachment and text provides specifications for these features *^` and explains their use. Two of the intended features, the landscaped medians with offset roadways and the traffic circle, tend to limit traffic speed. The third, the mini green, provides a more palatable alternative to the traditional cul-de-sac. Additionally, the roadway layout has been designed to limit long visual views of the roadway ahead by incorporating bends and arcs. The applicant envisions that there should be two positive impacts from incorporating these techniques into the subdivision roadway design. First, tra#~c should present less of a negative impact to the residents of the subdivision, particularly in the safety area. Second, the look and the feel of the subdivision will be more aesthetically pleasing, with the visual impact of the street system diminished. Both of these impacts should result in a higher quality of life for future subdivision residents and additionally should lessen tlae burden on future public oflxcials charged with responding to resident concerns with traffic impact on their neighborhood. "tiro Post Prosorve Dcvelopmcnt Text Version of September 22, 2000 Page 3 3) Community Plan Traffic Study The site was tested at two residential dwelling units per acre in the planning process for the 1997 Community Plan. 4) Post Road Right of Way Width Post Road is shown as 60' right of way in the Community Plan and in fact is presently 60'. Present City plans for the Perimeter Drive improvements appear to relocate this right of way to the south to accommodate the relocation along the frontage of the site. 5) Post Raad Sidewalks Sidewalks are being installed along the new Post Road right of way (north side) as part of the Perimeter Drive/Post Road relocation improvements. J PROPOSED SCH~:DULE O!' S1TE DEVELOPMENT... 1) Development o~'the site will begin at Perimeter Drive and will work northwazd. The number of phases is undetermined at this point in time, but will probably be three to five. Timing of the phases will depend on market conditions and absorption of lots. F) THE R6'LATIONSHlP O!' THE QEl~ELOPMENT 7'O EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE The site serves as art extension of existing single family residential development to the east and approved, but as yet unbuilt, residential development to the north. Part of this existing development is directly adjacent and the roads are intereonnected_ Although physically separated from the Lowell Trace subdivision by the nature preserve, this proposal will in fact be quite similar to Lowell Trace as a second single family neighborhood bordering the significant amenity represented by the preserve. Lot sizes of adjoining developments have typical 80' fronts at the building line. Compared to these adjoining developments, this proposal has the same ~ninimunn, front lot footage of 80', some lots of 90-100', lower density and lazger amounts of open space. The site is accessed froth new Perimeter Drive, but, homes are set back significantly and as a result are compatible with the non residential development, probably office, anticipated south of Post Road. Although the single remaining tract to the west is still in the township, it is reasonable to assume that site will sitnilazly develop as the final continuation of the single family residential use found in the overall quadrant bounded by Post, Avery, Hyland Croy and Brand Roads. This residential use is also the use provided for in the 1997 Dublin Comrrtunity Plan and in the Union County Comprehensive Plan of January 25, 1999. However, as a hedge against more intense development closer to Perimeter Drive, extra depth has been provided for the lots on the western boundary in the area reaching north fronn Post Road approximately 900' _ Within this area these lots have a depth of at least 140' to over 300'. A landscape buffer has been designed specifically for this edge as well (see "West Landscape Buffet" exhibit). The Community Plan shows this site as residential at a density of 2 dwelling units or [ess per acre. This proposal falls readily in that range. Overall, the proposal The Post Preserve Lkvelupmcnt Tcxt version of September 22, 2000 Page 4 represents the most logical land use for the site considering existing and planned development. G) Evidence that [he crpplicunt has sufficient control over the fund... 1) The applicant Dominion Homes is in contract to purchase the residential site. Property owner authorizations aze attached from the land presently in contract. Applicant will present reconfigured parcels at the time of presentation of the preliminary plat. H) Addilionad Commitments 1) A detailed tree survey, tree preservation plan and tree replacement plans will be prodded at the time of the preliminary plat; utility placennent will be designed to protect root zones. Applicant will worl< with the landowner to the west to reach an agreement for control of vegetation along the west boundary. 2) A landscape plan, per Code, will be provided at the time of the preliminary plat. "}~,~e ~reliminazy Ylat vvtll provide that no individual lot may have direct access to post Road pr Perimeter Drive. 4)~r aec®sspai~t f6f ffie church site (to east) with maximum widthofhp' will be provided. 5) Tot lot will be provided by applicant. Location to be determined in consultation with the City. J DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1) Developncxent standazds- 0 Use Single family residential only Lot Size All lots to have at least 80' fronts, measured at the front building line. Residents' Association A residents' association will be provided for by the deed restrictions. The deed restrictions will require the payment of dues by all property owners and will give lien rights to the association fox non payment o~ the dues. The residents' association will be responsible for maintenance of the entry features, the cut de sac islands, and the mini greens. The Post Preserve Devclopmtnr Tcxt Version of Septembtr 22, 2t1n0 Page 5 Open space and ponds along Post Road will be maintained by the homeowners association, unless the City requests otherwise, in which case the City will assume responsibility for ~SfI p-u~iTic open space. If this occurs, the homeowners association will still be responsible for maintaining tk~e entry features- Sidewalks will be per Dublin Code The applicant will install an eight foot bikepath along the ztortheastern boundary, connecting the woods aztd the stream area. Applicant will also install a bikepath along the stream area, connecting to the existing bikepath along the stream in the Red Trabue Nature Preserve and stubbing to the west boundary; applicant will bring its northern bike path south to connect to this bikepath. Applicant will additionally construct a bikepath connecting to the stream area bikepath from the mini-green at the southeastern portion of the site and then reaching southward to Perimeter Dzxve as shown on the Development Plan. Finally, a bikepath through the southern open space area at the south portion of the site will be provided as shown on the "Entry Enlargement Details" sheet, attached hereto. Applicant will construct bikepath bridges as necessary in consultation with City park ofi'xcials_ versity Throughout the development (1) the same model with the same front elevation shall not appear within two separate houses on the same side of the street and, (2) the same model with the same front elevation shall not appear directly across the street or side by side to the house directly across the street. Streets shall count as a lot when applying the above formulas. When the lot in question is a corner lot no lot at the same Corner shall have the same model with the same front elevation. At the time of the preliminary plat for each phase, the applicant will provide a matrix tv assist in application of the diversity standard- For each lot, this matrix will list which other lots are affected by application of the standard_ Exterior Materials Homes shall use one or more of the ioiiowing matenats ivr ul~ vertical exterior opaque surfaces of the home: a. brick b_ stone (natural or synthetic) c_ stucco d. wood siding/shingles, exclusive of T-1-11 plywood, board and batten or other plywood/vertical siding types. Wood trim, eve and soffit material may be any conventionally used wood products of a similar quality Y'he Post PreseNe pevclopmcnt Text Version of September 22, 2000 Pe~c 6 level to the materials used in the main structure. e. Hardiplank or Werzalit type ,naterial5.provided they are not gloss or semi gloss finish. f. other durable, solid thickness building materials with sirrxilar chazacteristics to tine above materials. Such determination may be made at the time of approval by Plannins Commission of the Development Plan, or at the tune of the Preliminary or Final Plats. After approval of the Final Plat, Planning Staff may make such determination. If the applicant is riot satisfied with Planning Staff's determination, review by the Planning Commiss~en may be requested. Garage Location ~ All garages shall m~!`t tt~ following standards: a. Garage doors shall comprise no rztore than 50% of a building's total front facade. Garage structures protruding more than 10 feet from the main structure shall be articulated with windows or other architectural features or detailing. b. Overhead garage doors will be of raised panel design. 2) No more than 1/3 of the homes may have a garage door: a) facing the same direction as the front facade, and, b) protruding in front of a major element of the front facade in excess of four feet. 3) With respect to a house that does not niteet the standard in 2(a), above, another house with a garage that also does not meet the 2(a) standazd will not be located next door or directly across the street. For the purpose of this section, a street will count as a house. ~ 4) Aside load garage will trot face another side load garage on an adjoining lot (does not include corner lots). Foundations er building code. Roof Pitches ~ Roofs shall be at least 6/12 pitch Shade Trees Each home shall be provided with at least two shade trees, 2" rninitnutzt caliper in the front yard, exclusive of required street trees and foundation plantings along the street side(s). Post Lamps All homes shall be provided with post lamps located not more than 2/3 of the building setback from the right of way line. 'fhe Post Preserve Development Tux vcr~ion of September 22, 2000 Psne 7 Fireplaces Direct vent fireplaces are permitted only on rear elevations. All chimney chases shall be of either masonry or stucco. Shutters If used, shutters shall be panel type (not louvered) and shall be only the following colors black, dark blue, burgundy (not permitted with gray siding), green 8c gray (with white or gray siding only). Mailbox Uniform design to be selected by applicant. Fences Not permitted except as otherwise required by law or this text. Front Yard Building At least 25 feet from edge of ROW; will vary to provide visual Setback interest. Setbacks will stagger from 30-35' on lots with bikepaths in front yards; 25-30' from ROW oz~ other lots. Any above ground utility structures placed forwazd of the building setback line will be completely screened by landscaping, subject to staff approval. Side Yard Building 15' total, minimum 7' Setback Rear Yard Setback 30 feet. A 20 foot no-build or no-disturb zone will be placed at the reaz of all lots ("no-disturb" where trees exist) with 10' no- build zones on side yards abutting pazks. parking setback er Dublin Code. Entry Feature Schematic design is depicted on exhibit titled "Entry Enlazgement Details", and includes a t 1.3 acre pond, wood rail fencing, a post sign with project identification, perennial plantings, a t 150' stone retaining wall and bosque oft 26 ornamental trees. Earth berms and landscaping are proposed for the northern edge of the pond. Lots/homes have been arranged to frame the entry with fronts and sides of architecture. signage Applicant anticipates no further signage in the residential area. Any additional signage or entry features will comply with Dublin Sign Code. Buffer/Setback from 1-lomes shall be set bank at least 200'from the edge of the right Perimeter Drive or way for new Perimeter Drive. The Post Preserve Dcvelopmcnt Tex[ Version of septcmtKr 22, 2000 Page R >:,; 1;1'1'1 (-P Ul Rl.l\ ~'~` Division of Planning 5800Shier-Rings Raad tub~in, Ohio 43016-1236 .~,: Phane/tOD: 614.161.6550 fax: 614-161 X566 Web Site: www.dubl"in.ah.us PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION September 7, 2000 x The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Rezoning Application 00-0572 ~ The Post Preserve Location: 78.33 acres located on new Perimeter Drive and Post Road, approximately 750 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification). Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Proposed Use: A subdivision of 154 lots and 21.91 acres of park. Applicants: Dominion Homes, 5501 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Albert Lee and Florence Schoby, Trustees, 6233 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Northwest Assembly of God, 7055 Avery Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Chris Cline, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this application because the plan conforms to the Community Plan, provides an extension of the Red Trabue Nature Reserve, provides interconnection with surrounding neighborhoods and Hyland-Croy Road, and enhances the scenic character along Perimeter Drive and Post Road, with 19 conditions: 1) That the applicant work with staff to coordinate the entrance road to the future Liggett Road intersection along Perimeter Drive; 2) That the western buffer plan be used as a guide, and that a more detailed buffer plan including evergreens of vazious heights (6-12 feet) be submitted at preliminary plat; 3) That a note specifying that the adjoining western property is "outside of the City of Dublin's jurisdiction for planning and zoning" be indicated at preliminary plat, and that "Dublin City limit" be indicated along the length of the property line; 4) That the applicant demonstrate that open space areas, which include retention ponds will retain appropriate park/usability and access chazacteristics, subject to staff approval; 5) That a tree survey, preservation plan, and replacement plan be submitted at preliminary plat, including an agreement for control of vegetation along the Gorden property, subject to staff approval; 1 ~ ~ b0 ~~;~y ir7CtT11VCi orv Il DSO 1~U Page 1 of 2 t•~+ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION September 7, 2000 2. Rezoning Application 00-0572 -The Post Preserve (Continued) 6) That the text be revised to indicate that no individual lot may have direct access onto Perimeter Drive and Post Road, and that access points shallFbe coordinated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 7) That the site meet all City engineering requirements for utilities, including stormwater and floodplains; 8) That preliminary stormwater design analysis be in conformance with the City's stormwater management requirements and be provided at preliminary plat; 9) That an azchitectural diversity matrix be provided at preliminary plat; 10) That the text include the 60-foot right-of--way access to the church site, and that this be shown at preliminary plat; 11) That necessary text revisions for staggered front setbacks of 30-35 feet for lots with bikepaths, 25-30 feet front setbacks for all other lots, and all development standazds mentioned in this report be provided; 12) That bikepath connections, bridges, and easements mentioned in this report be indicated at preliminary plat; 13) That specific ownership and maintenance for all amenities be established in the zoning text; 14) That atot-lot be designed and built, subject to staff approval; 15) That the plan be revised to reflect the conditions listed above at preliminary plat; 16) That the text be revised to eliminate the foundation requirement and the parking requirement and stick to Code; 17) That text be amended to eliminate G in the vinyl siding standards and to eliminate point G in exterior materials with respect to vertical surfaces; 18) That the text be revised to require that side load garage driveways are to be alternated so that they aze not next to each other; and 19) That a total of nine lots be eliminated to bring the density down to approximately 1.85 du/ac in the manner agreed to at the meeting; to provide a larger vista to the northeast park and to make lots wider in the southern section. * Chris Cline agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION le Eze Senior Planner Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 5 2. Rezoning Application 00-0572 -The Post Preserve Location: 78.33 acres located on new Perimeter Drive and Post Road, approximately 750 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification). Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Proposed Use: A subdivision of 1541ots and 21.91 acres of park. Applicants: Dominion Homes, 5501 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Albert Lee and Florence Schoby, Trustees, 6233 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Northwest Assembly of God, 7055 Avery Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Chris Cline, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500, Dublin, Ohio 43017. Staff Contact: Kyle Ezell, Senior Planner. UPDATE: This case was tabled on July 20, 2000 without discussion. Since that time, the location of the entrance road has changed from Post Road to the new Perimeter Drive (under construction). A buffer plan for the western edge property has also been prepared. BACKGROUND: This is a new application. The former application from March of this year proposed a church site. That proposal was withdrawn. This development includes asingle-family subdivision of 154 lots and 21.91 acres of park. The Planned Low Density Residential District generally establishes the permissible uses and density, development standards, size of park area(s), and schematic layout. If approved, these will become binding upon the developer. The Commission must make a recommendation on the rezoning request. The application is then returned to City Council for a public hearing and final vote. Atwo-thirds vote of City Council is necessary to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council ~vo~e. The development will also be subject to the preliminary and final platting requirements at a later date. ~~ CONSIDERATIONS: Site Characteristics • The site consists of three parcels totaling 78.33 acres on the north side of Post Road. Together they create an "L-shaped" area with about 480 feet of frontage on Post Road and a depth of over 3,700 feet. It is located 600 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. Upon its completion, the site will have approximately 400 feet of new Perimeter Drive frontage, and about 100 feet along Post Road. The Northwest Assembly of God is retaining approximately 26 acres at the southeastern corner of the original site, and is not part of this application. • The site is generally cropland and contains a nursery. One single-family house sits along the Post Road frontage. Broken tree rows line the perimeter of the site, and an approximately 5.5-acre stand of woods is located at the northeast corner of the site. The Tri-County Ditch runs west to east throughout the middle of the site. ,•-~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 6 • This site is located entirely in Union County and was annexed to the City of Dublin in August, 1999. It continues to have a U-1, Rural District, (township) zoning. • The site is bordered on the east by the Gorden Farms Apartments, the Red Trabue Nature Reserve, and Wyndham Village subdivision. The recently approved Park Place subdivision will be to the north. The apartments and the city park are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and both subdivisions are zoned PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. To the west is the 46-acre Gordon parcel in unincorporated Jerome Township zoned U-1. The Perimeter Drive extension and its associated office park are currently under construction to the south. Community Plan Issues • Hyland-Croy Road is the western limit of Dublin's "exclusive" annexation area. This site is separated from Hyland-Croy Road by the Gorden parcel (approximately 600 feet wide) in unincorporated Jerome Township. • The plan proposes asingle-family subdivision of 154 lots and 21.91 acres of park. The Community Plan preferred land use is residential with a recommended 1-2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 1.96 units per acre. • The Community Plan designates Post Road as a scenic road and recommends preserving the character along the roadway. The pending "Road to Wow!" program designates this section of Post Road as "Agricultural Character." The section of new Perimeter Drive east to Hyland-Croy Road will also be designated Agricultural Character. • This development conforms to the recommended 200-foot setback along Post Road. Post Preserve matches the treatment set by the Park Place and Bishop Crossing subdivisions to the north. The proposed setback also compliments the Gorden Farm Apartments, which are set back over 500 feet from Post Road. • "Wow!" elements include: An "ornamental bosque" of 26 trees; split-rail style fences (length not specified in text); and a naturalized pond of approximately 1.3 acres. The design also includes 150 feet of stone wall bordering the pond and the edge of the southern cul-de-sac. Other features include evergreen trees, a park along the northern edge of the pond, and anentry-sign with associated landscaping. At preliminary plat, all of these elements shall be indicated and must conform to the proposed "Wow! Design Element Guidelines" where applicable. • The Council and Commission are currently reviewing architectural standards for new residential developments. These standards will provide a clear policy to be applied for all new developments in Dublin. As will be the case ,for all undeveloped but approved subdivisions, these standards will apply when adopted by Council. Therefore, the architectural standards set forth in this development text may be redefined in the future. Site Layout • In coordination with the western extension of Perimeter Drive currently under construction, the subdivision entrance will intersect with the new Perimeter Drive, (not Post Road). This will involve utilizing a small corner of the Gorden property to the west, and the entrance will need to be closely coordinated with the Perimeter Drive project. The entrance will become an extension of Liggett Road, creating a new aligned intersection. *~ ' Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 7 The entrance road runs north through the site with a slight jog where it bridges the Tri- County Ditch (Indian Run). The street layout includes three "mini-green" cul-de-sacs and several loops off the main road. The plan shows connections to Wyndham Village (Royal Plume Drive), and the approved Park Place subdivision to the north. Three stubs are provided to the undeveloped property on the western boundary (Gorden). A 60-foot access point is indicated on the plan to connect the church property to the main north-south road. There are some questionable corner lots, especially those near the proposed entrance to the church. Corner lots must be demonstrated to be buildable or they should be eliminated at the preliminary plat stage. Parkland/Open Space • The Dublin Code requires a dedication of 10.04 acres of park based on 78.33 acres and 154 units. The plan indicates a total of 21.91 acres of open space divided among three areas. Open space includes 14.11 acres along the Tri-County Ditch connecting to the Red Trabue Nature Reserve, a 7.65-acre open space (including the 5.5-acre woodland), and 2.15 acres of road frontage. Staff recommends that a homeowners' association maintain the scenic road frontage as has been the case with many recently approved subdivisions. • A greenway corridor (approximately 1,300 feet long with an average width of 300 feet) is planned along the Tri-County Ditch. This will be a westward linear greenway extension of the Red Trabue Nature Reserve. There will be stormwater management areas on both sides of the creek. A one-acre retention pond is proposed on the southern edge of this open space. Another one-acre pond is proposed just south of the stand of woods. Staff is concerned there may be little usable open space after providing for the stormwater requirements. It is not clear whether any areas will remain for tot lots, gathering places, etc. A specific plan for the Tri-County Ditch area and the northeast open space is needed. The plan should include the concept and placement for amenities associated with the open space, landscaping, and exactly where and how much open space outside the floodway will remain. If it is determined that park space is not usable, additional space must be provided at preliminary plat. • Bikepaths are indicated on the east side of the property connecting the northeast woods to the Red Trabue Nature Reserve. Bikepaths must continue along the Tri-County Ditch open area with a stub to the west. Bikepath connections to Post Road and Perimeter Drive, Park Place subdivision, and the Gorden property are also needed. Bridges, where necessary, shall be incorporated into the plan, and should be the developer's responsibility. The developer shall build a full eight-foot bikepath along the Perimeter Drive/Post Road frontage that will meander around the proposed frontage pond. A bikepath also exists on Royal Plume Drive to the east, and it should be extended westward through the site. • A tree preservation and replacement plan based on a tree survey is required at preliminary plat. Additional information on individual trees and caliper is needed. The woods in the site's northeastern corner contain mature trees. There are also significant tree rows along the property lines, which should be described in a survey. • The bikepath easement along this tree row must be 50 feet to properly connect with the one in Park Place subdivision. This will continue the north-south connection between the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 8 proposed Metro Park and the Red Trabue Nature Reserve. The 50-foot easement should be shown somewhere in the plan. • No tot lots are proposed for the site. Staff recommends that a tot lot should be incorporated somewhere in the plan. • The text establishes a forced and funded homeowners' association that would maintain the entry features, cul-de-sac islands, and mini-greens. The City will maintain the 7.65- acre northeast woods/open space area and the 14.11-acre open space connecting to the Red Trabue Reserve. Specific ownership and maintenance responsibility must be established in the zoning text. Development Standards • Because the Gorden parcel to the west remains in Jerome Township, its potential future land use is completely outside of Dublin's control. An uneven tree row exists on this 3,700-foot boundary. • The Gorden parcel is zoned U-1, Rural District. Because of the new Post/Perimeter/L1S 161/33 interchange reconfiguration, land uses along this strip of Hyland-Croy Road have the potential to become commercial. Staff believes this is especially true near the intersection. The text states that it is "reasonable to assume that the Gorden site will be developed as single family residential." Because it is completely outside Dublin's control, it must be assumed that more intensive uses would be possible. • A comprehensive buffer plan was submitted for the western edge. It treats the length in increments of 50 and 100 linear feet to enhance the uneven tree row. The plan, in the opinion of staff, creates a natural buffer designed specifically for this site. More detail will be required at preliminary plat. Staff recommends incorporating evergreens (6-12 feet tall) into the plan to increase opacity in some areas. Which trees that are actually located on the Post Preserve side are unknown, and some agreement between the two owners of the tree row now may be needed. • The preliminary plat needs to clearly indicate the boundary of the City of Dublin and Jerome Township, and include a note specifying that the adjoining western parcel is out of the City's jurisdiction for planning and zoning. • The zoning text sets a minimum lot width of 80 feet. It does not specify minimum lot depth and area, and these need to be specified in the text. The plan generally shows lots of 80 feet by 130 feet (10,400 square feet). The development standards include a 25-foot front setback, a combined side yard of 15 feet with a minimum side yard of seven feet, and a rear yard of 30 feet. Staff is recommending 30 to 35-foot setbacks for lots facing bikepaths, and staggered setbacks throughout the development. • Fences will conform to the new Dublin Fence Code. Architecture • The text addresses architectural diversity in the same manner as Westbury and Kendall Ridge. A front elevation will not be repeated within two houses to each side or three houses directly across the street. A matrix for architecture must be submitted at preliminary plat. • The text limits materials to brick, stone, stucco, fibrous cement siding, and wood siding (other than T-1-11) or as approved by the Commission. The text permits one-fourth of the homes in the subdivision to have more than 40 percent of the exterior opaque surface Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report = September 7, 2000 Page 9 covered in vinyl siding. These homes must have stone or brick on the exposed foundation. • The text indicates additional architectural requirements. No more than one-third of all homes may have a garage door facing the same direction as the front facade; Garages can not comprise more than 50 percent of the building's front facade; and those that protrude more than 10 feet must have architectural detailing. All roofs shall have at least 6:12 pitch. No chimneys will be vinyl, and direct vent fireplaces are permitted on rear elevations only. Because there are so many corner lots, staff is concerned that most of the side-load garages will be located there. This will not diversify the appearance along the balance of the street. Traffic Management and Street Design • The text states that intersection improvements will be coordinated with staff. Street lighting needs to be installed at the entry intersection by the developer. The preliminary plat should prohibit lot access to Post Road or Perimeter Drive. • This site layout features the use of traffic calming devices. The main north-south road is direct and one traffic circle, slight curves, landscaped medians, and on-street parking are being used to slow traffic. Staff supports these traffic-calming measures. • The reconfiguration of the interchange of Post Road and US 33/SR 161 may require Liggett Road to be realigned. Recently, the applicant has worked with staff to position the access road in a location that is reasonably close to this new intersection. The intent is to make the new access road for Post Preserve an extension of Liggett Road, and form a new intersection. The applicant and staff will further refine the details of the access at preliminary plat. • Since the adjacent church-owned parcel of 26 acres could reasonably be developed as another subdivision, staff is requesting an access or street stub to the main north-south road (60-foot right of way). The plan includes this access, but the text must be amended to reflect this request. ,~~~ Utilities • Sanitary sewer service is available from a 21-inch main on the south side of Post Road. Water service is available from a 16-inch main on the south side of Post Road and an 8- inch line on Royal Plume Drive. A looped water system is needed. These lines must be designed and extended by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • Wet ponds are shown in several places: At the entrance; along the northeastern property line south of the northeast stand of woods; and south of the Tri-County Ditch. This site is within both the South and North Fork of Indian Run subbasins. The use of wet basins is encouraged to improve the water quality of storm run-off and aesthetics. Again, a specific plan is needed to demonstrate that this layout yields usable park areas in addition to storm water facilities. • Portions of this site along the Tri-County Ditch are in the 100-year floodplain. This section has not had a detailed FEMA study. The FEMA-designated floodplain area for this ditch in Franklin County averages about 200-feet in width. A survey must be performed and the 100-year floodplain located in the field and on the plan. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed use is appropriate for this site. It will add another good neighborhood. The density is 1.96 du/ac. Staff recommends approval with 16 conditions: 1) That the applicant work with staff to coordinate the entrance road to the future Liggett Road intersection along Perimeter Drive; 2) That the western buffer plan be used as a guide, and that a more detailed buffer plan including evergreens of various lengths from 6-12 feet be submitted at preliminary plat; 3) That a note specifying that the adjoining western property is "outside of the City of Dublin's jurisdiction for planning and zoning" be indicated at preliminary plat, and that "Dublin City limit" be indicated along the length of the property line; 4) That the applicant demonstrate that open space areas which include retention ponds will retain appropriate park, usability, and access characteristics, subject to staff approval; 5) That a tree survey, preservation plan, and replacement plan be submitted at preliminary plat. This should include an agreement for control of vegetation along the Gorden property, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to indicate that no individual lot may have direct access onto Perimeter Drive and Post Road, and that access points shall be coordinated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 7) That the site meet all City engineering requirements for utilities, including stormwater and floodplains; 8) That preliminary stormwater design analysis be in conformance with the City's stormwater management requirements and be provided at preliminary plat; 9) That an architectural diversity matrix be provided at preliminary plat; 10) That the text include the 60-foot right-of--way access to the church site, and that this be shown at preliminary plat; 11) That necessary text revisions for staggered front setbacks of 30-35 feet for lots with bikepaths, 25-30 feet front setbacks for all other lots, and all development standards mentioned in this report be provided and indicated at preliminary plat; 12) That bikepath connections, bridges, and easements mentioned in this report be indicated at preliminary plat; 13) That specific ownership and maintenance for all amenities be established in the zoning text; 14) That new standards for architecture apply to this development when adopted by Council and that these override the standards set forth in the development text; 15) That atot-lot be designed and built, subject to staff approval; and 16) That the plan be revised to reflect the conditions listed above at preliminary plat. Bases: 1) The plan conforms to the Community Plan. 2) The plan provides an extension of the Red Trabue Nature Reserve. 3) The plan provides interconnection with surrounding neighborhoods and Hyland- Croy Road. A Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - September 7, 2000 Page 11 4) The plan, as revised, enhances the scenic character along Perimeter Drive and Post Road. SCALE: 1 IN EQU LS 1244FT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~, g~ y " $ .? 3 w+-TS ' ~ cr 4' .F fA ~ ~r ~ t wa~T ~ r.r®~ ~a wwosors ~` w'~k at+ r rr~ SITE ~ WA, r ~1t~\ ~.\ "~ s. iii: i ~ ~ 1( o ~ 00-057Z '°' ~ t ~ Rezoning Post Preserve ___.,e_.,.~e,. ~ li ...~ w~% ~~~ R ~~,~~ R R R I ~~ SITE R ___- R 1B ~ - 00-057Z & Rezoning Post Preserve Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 6 2. Rezoning 00-0572 -Post Preserve Kyle Ezell said this rezoning application is for 78.33 acres on the north side of Post Road, about 750 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. It has Jerome Township U-1 zoning, and PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District is requested for 1541ots, 21.9 acres of park, and 1.96 units per acre. Mr. Ezell said a similar application was considered in March, but the 26 acres for the church has been deleted. He showed several slides. Mr. Ezell said one of the biggest issues is the property to the west (Gorden) outside Dublin. Its future land use is unknown and out of Dublin's control. A comprehensive buffering plan was developed for the entire western property line. He said the plan has a 1.5-acre pond with a nice park area in the north, ornamental bosques, and split rail fences. This will enhance the Post Road entrance and provides a connection to the Perimeter Drive extension. Mr. Ezell said staff requests removal of Condition 14 as listed in the staff report. He said staff recommends approval with these 15 conditions: 1) That the applicant work with staff to coordinate the entrance road to the future Liggett Road intersection along Perimeter Drive; 2) That the western buffer plan be used as a guide, and that a more detailed buffer plan including evergreens of various lengths from 6-12 feet be submitted at preliminary plat; 3) That a note specifying that the adjoining western property is "outside of the City of Dublin's jurisdiction for planning and zoning" be indicated at preliminary plat, and that "Dublin City limit" be indicated along the length of the property line; 4) That the applicant demonstrate that open space areas which include retention ponds will retain appropriate park, usability, and access characteristics, subject to staff approval; 5) That a tree survey, preservation plan, and replacement plan be submitted at preliminary plat, to include an agreement for control of vegetation along the Gorden property, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to indicate that no individual lot may have direct access onto Perimeter Drive and Post Road, and that access points shall be coordinated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 7) That the site meet all City engineering requirements for utilities, including stormwater and floodplains; 8) That preliminary stormwater design analysis be in conformance with the City's stormwater management requirements and be provided at preliminary plat; 9) That an architectural diversity matrix be provided at preliminary plat; 10) That the text include the 60-foot right-of--way access to the church site, and that this be shown at preliminary plat; 11) That necessary text revisions for staggered front setbacks of 30-35 feet for lots with bikepaths, 25-30 feet front setbacks for all other lots, and all development standards mentioned in this report be provided and indicated at preliminary plat; 12) That bikepath connections, bridges, and easements mentioned in this report be indicated at preliminary plat; 13) That specific ownership and maintenance for all amenities be established in the zoning text; 14) That atot-lot be designed and built, subject to staff approval; and 15) That the plan be revised to reflect the conditions listed above at preliminary plat. Mr. Ezell said mini-greens are on the cul de sac, and there is a stone retention wall, a traffic circle, and a triangle in the southwest corner. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 7 Ms. Boring asked which mini-greens got parkland credit. Mr. Ezell said the plan has 21.91 acres of park, and it required approximately ten acres. The front setback got half credit. Mr. Ezell said staff is concerned that the area needed for detention will grow when the engineering is complete, at the expense of usable park area. They are now depicted as two acres smaller than shown at the last review (one acre apiece). Ms. Boring asked what happens if the parkland is not usable. Mr. Ezell said the applicant has .~ agreed that the usable parkspace as presented will remain at the preliminary plat. Ms. Clarke added that frequently the final stormwater engineering indicates much larger ponds than initially depicted. Sometimes the ponds "grow" nearly equal to the size of the area set aside for park. She said the applicant is being put on notice that if the park becomes less usable due to stormwater needs, he should expect to lose lots. The detention is shown near the stream, in the most important area of all, the park acreage being provided. The park unifies the two development areas into one neighborhood. Ms. Boring asked if that was a condition. Mr. Ezell said yes, Condition 4. Mr. Lecklider was concerned about pedestrian bicycle access to the parkland. Mr. Ezell said a bikepath is proposed from the Red Trabue Preserve to the northeast area around the pond. He said the staff report suggested that a bikepath be provided through the "Red Trabue Greenway extension" around the Tri-County Ditch. Access will be taken care of with Condition 12. Mr. Lecklider said the parkland needs greater visibility, especially near the northeast water feature. He noted Trinity and Wyndham Village parks have frontage on neighborhood streets. Fred Hahn said this is an extension of the Red Trabue Park, and the park along the Tri-County Ditch will be managed similarly. He said no tennis courts, etc. are expected in that area. The park is the widest near the Tri-County Ditch basin, and this area should provide some design flexibility. The greenbelt there is approximately 500 feet. The northeastern park is more conducive to neighborhood park features. Ms. Boring said the park is hidden and blocked by houses. Mr. Hahn said the 12-plus acre park '~" along the center greenbelt is very accessible and visible. He said the northeastern park is a very nice wooded lot. He said the bikepath connects through that area to the subdivision immediately north. He said it is secluded from road visibility, but not from the public or from the use. Ms. Boring said more public exposure was needed. Ms. Boring asked if the entry road would be a temporary access because the applicant does not yet own the land. Paul Hammersmith said Dublin has an agreement with the developer on the acquisition of land for its entry road connection to Perimeter Drive. Mitch Banchefsky said when off-site right-of--way is needed, the City requires a developer to make an effort to acquire the land. Dublin works with the owner in question and uses its power of eminent domain to acquire the property if necessary. The City will be reimbursed. Ms. Boring asked if a Post Road entry would require alert-turn lane. Mr. Hammersmith said no, because there will be a left-turn lane at the intersection of Post Road. Ms. Boring thought the developer should be required to provide alert-turn lane on Perimeter Drive to be consistent with Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 8 City policy. Mr. Hammersmith said Perimeter Drive will provide access to this site, and it will have sufficient width for alert-turn lane at this location. Ms. Clarke said a left turn lane is required on a substandard (two-lane) road. The extension of Perimeter Drive is underway, and when this development is done, it will no longer be a substandard road. The RailVan building is under construction, and that project is on a fast track. Mr. Hammersmith said he needed to confirm that Perimeter Drive will have a left turn lane. Ms. Clarke said, except for having an approved road project underway, this proposal would have required alert-turn lane because then it would be fronting on a substandard road (Post Road). Ms. Boring thought the developer should fund a portion of the cost for the left-turn lane. Ms. Boring asked about raised speed humps for traffic calming. Mr. Hammersmith responded that residents have complained about the noise and potential vehicle damage. In this instance, the traffic circle is a better traffic-calming device. Mr. Sprague said the plan has some creative Wow elements. The recommended Community Plan density is one to two du/ac in this area, and the plan shows 1.96 du/ac. City Council has said the density should drop as development moves west. This is above those recommendations. Mr. Ezell agreed that Council wanted lower density to the west. He said Park Place and the Bishop development will have similar densities. Those proposals had exceptional design, and were approved at that level. Mr. Sprague agreed the designs were excellent. Mr. Sprague said the Road to Wow is primarily designed to preserve rural scenic roadways, such as Post Road. He supports having an internally attractive neighborhood for the residents, but that is not the Wow purpose. He did not see the consistency between the Wow elements and the density proposed. Unless the agreed-upon densities have increased, this seems too dense. Mr. Fishman thought this neighborhood was going to have all natural materials, but up to 40 percent of the exterior opaque surface can be vinyl siding. Mr. Ezell said this resulted from direction given previously by the Commission. Mr. Fishman thought this neighborhood should also utilize all natural materials. Mr. Fishman recalled the density was to be 1.5 du/ac when this proposal included a church. He was not satisfied with Mr. Ezell's density response, and he thought the density should drop to the west. This is unsatisfactory. He suggested eliminating three lots in front of the park and three or four in front of the water feature, for access and a park vista. This would lower the density. Mr. Lecklider thought the architectural standards should be included now. He wanted to know how that could work legally if they are not included now. Mr. Banchefsky said the architectural requirement could be triggered at the building permit, outside of the zoning purview. The said no law can be applied retroactively. Mr. Lecklider said the Commission should resolve the architectural materials now and record this in the development text, to eliminate any dispute later. Mr. Banchefsky agreed. Mr. Lecklider said he understood the text to say that not more than 25 percent of the homes in the subdivision will have more than 40 percent vinyl siding. This means that 25 percent of the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 9 homes could be all vinyl, and the remaining 75 percent could be up to 40 percent vinyl. Mr. Lecklider said this was unacceptable. Mr. Lecklider said he wished that some of the recent architectural standards had been imposed on his neighborhood, Wyndham Village. They can make a terrific subdivision outstanding. He would like architectural standards similar to those Park Place and Belevedere. Mr. Fishman agreed all natural materials should be used. Ms. Boring said for maintenance purposes, some vinyl should be permitted. Mr. Lecklider said he was in favor of 25 percent of the homes being vinyl with a minimum thickness of the vinyl and special attention to the installation procedures, backed by plywood, etc. He said he would like the 40 percent figure reduced to 15 to 20 percent, to allow its use for trim. Mr. Fishman agreed. Mr. Lecklider clarified that 25 percent of the homes could be predominately vinyl. Mr. Fishman did not agree with this position, and said this was not the direction given at the March 16 meeting. He quoted from the minutes. . Mr. Fishman said if seven lots were eliminated, the density is still 1.8 du/ac. Mr. Lecklider noted there will be a connection to the land to the east. If it does not become a church, it would likely become residential. He asked if the Jerome Township zoning would be replaced by Dublin zoning. Mr. Ezell said staff is working on the subject of rezoning newly annexed parcels and, said something will be submitted in the next month or two. Mr. Lecklider thought there should be some level of review of the adjoining church parcel. Mr. Banchefsky said a church is a permitted use in almost any zoning district within the City. In all of the straight-zoning districts, they would need only to file a building permit. Mr. Lecklider asked if the Commission had any discretion on this issue. Mr. Banchefsky said Code said rezoning by the City should happen as soon as practical after annexation, and the Commission has discretion to put it in whatever district it feels appropriate, provided it is reasonable. It should reflect the Community Plan. Mr. Lecklider said Dublin should do this very soon. Mr. Lecklider asked which corner lots along the main road might not be buildable. Mr. Ezell ~"""" said the primary one was south of the stub. Staff would like to see a footprint since it is at a 90 degree type angle to assure that the corners on the boulevard work. Mr. Lecklider noted that if they were not demonstrated as buildable to the Commission's satisfaction at the preliminary plat stage, those lots would be lost. Mr. Ezell agreed. Mr. Lecklider said when Dublin develops park that is surrounded by homes, it is a controversial issue for the residents. He said it would be better to develop parkland sooner. Christopher Cline, attorney for Dominion Homes, said two one-acre ponds are necessary at the ditch on the north and on the south side. He agreed to work with staff in locating the ponds. He said Perimeter Drive was already approved with alert-turn lane when this project was first proposed. Because of the interchange improvements, Dublin wants to realign Liggett Road. He said they are incurring added expense to cooperate with Dublin on the siting of their entrance. Mr. Cline said the gross number is slightly below two du/ac. The previous application computed it including the 26-acre church site. He said 25 lots were eliminated, and this is significant. He said two recent developments have higher densities, and he wanted equivalent treatment. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 10 Mr. Cline said they were addressing diversity. These houses will be comparable to Shannon Glen. The predominantly vinyl designs look very nice. If the goal is to have different appearing houses in a subdivision, high quality vinyl (.44 mils) is appropriate. He said his text exceeds the architectural ordinance on tonight's agenda. This text is more involved than in any of the adjoining approved developments. Mr. Cline said the park locations were dictated by the City to preserve the woods and extend the Red Trabue Nature Preserve. Mr. Cline said the bikepath stretches 3,800 feet from the north at Park Place to Perimeter Drive. They have been asked to construct the bikepath and whatever bridges are involved from east to west. Formerly, they understood the bridges to be a City responsibility. He said there is a very high level of access to the openspace. Mr. Peplow said the parkland vista was the problem. It is hidden. The other developments to the north also had significantly more Wow elements than this plan. Mr. Cline said there is good visibility of the park, and the other plans contained no traffic claming. He gave several examples and said they were willing to discuss it further, but he did not think this plan lacked visibility. He said they exceeded the park requirement. Mr. Cline said he was confident that the two, one-acre ponds would not increase in size. Mr. Sprague asked about the realignment of the connection from the Red Trabue Nature Preserve to the Metro Park. Mr. Cline understood the north south eight-foot bikepath would lead to Perimeter Drive and across Brand Road. Mr. Cline said this site was annexed in May 1999. He was directed in March 1999 to extend the Red Trabue Preserve along this creek. The park will be deeded to the City. He said the 21.91 acres of net openspace does not include mini-greens. Gary Schmidt, Schmidt Landscape Design, said the Red Trabue Preserve extension includes 14.1 acres. Mr. Fishman noted the other nearby developments contributed land to the Metro Park, and that had an impact on their densities. He said the previous minutes are clear about the recommendation that density should drop moving to the west. The applicant was strongly encouraged to use a density close to 1.5 du/ac. This plan is exceeds that density. He recommended eliminating at least seven lots to bring the density down to 1.8 du/ac. Mr. Fishman supported a compromise on materials to permit teb percent synthetic material on the all-natural houses, to include vinyl sofitts, etc. He said Belevedere made the commitment to use all natural materials. He could not support 40 percent vinyl, even if it is high quality. Mr. Eastep did not think that vinyl would add to diversity if wood or Hardi-plank are included.. Mr. Cline said they would agree that all of the vertical surfaces would be of natural materials. Mr. Cline agreed to eliminate five lots, but said he could not reduce the density to 1.5 du/ac. He said they would eliminate the first three from the east of the northeastern openspace, three consecutive lots in the southeast corner to provide a vista into openspace, and the two lots at the southwest corner of the woods. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 11 Mr. Lecklider said he had a problem with the southernmost lot and its proximity to Post Road or Perimeter Drive. It does not work with the large setbacks of Gorden Farms. Mr. Cline said the buildable area of that lot would be 200 feet from Post Road. He noted they had lost two lots to move the road to align with Liggett Road. Mr. Fishman said they did not "lose" the lots, as the property is not zoned for more than one unit per acre at present. The recommended density is 1.5 du/ac. The Commission wants to reach that density, and to satisfy the vista concern. The Commission has been plain for every case that the density should decrease as development moves to the west. The Commission's responsibility is to follow the Community Plan. This is a lovely development, but the density is too high. If it is not economically feasible, perhaps the development is premature. Mr. Fishman said the concern is the park. Mr. Cline said they have committed to contribute a tot lot. Mr. Cline said only two lots remained at the northern entryway. He said they do not have any concerns with the buildability of any of the lots, except the two by the church access. Mr. Lecklider thought the text exceeded several other recent ones. He asked if side-loading garages are practicable on these narrow lots. Mr. Cline said the commitment could be met by either side-loading or non-protruding garages. There is a provision in the text which addresses that by minimizing the asphalt turnaround area. Each house will have its own driveway, it would allow the turnaround areas pull out of the garage to become part of the maneuvering area. Ms. Salay asked if the driveways would connect. Mr. Cline said no. Mr. Eastep said Code requires athree-foot separation of the driveway. Mr. Cline said the text minimized that if it would facilitate aside-loading garage. Mr. Eastep said 80-foot lots will look crammed together. He said the Code requires athree-foot landscape buffer on each lot, creating a six-foot green area between driveways. This proposal asks for a variance to that Code section so that the driveways will basically abut. He did not see anything gained by this. Mr. Cline said it was identified as a planning goal. Mr. Eastep was not convinced that afull-size house with aside-load garage could fit on an 80-foot wide lot. Mr. Lecklider appreciated the applicant's efforts, but he said the driveways need to be separate, preferably with six feet between them. Mr. Cline suggested that they delete the garage provisions from the text. Ms. Boring said as a resident, she would not want her bedroom next to the neighbor's garage. Mr. Cline said the proposed diversity ordinance talks about aten-foot protrusion of the garage and they proposed afour-foot protrusion, which is much stricter. He committed to change the text so that side-loaded garages will not be face other side-loaded garages. It should be noted that Mr. Cline argued that the development text reflected the diversity that Council had noted in the ordinance in the packet received. * As amended at the October 19, 2000 meeting Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 12 Ms. Boring said Council forwarded the staff-prepared ordinance to the Commission. It was referred without discussion. Ms. Susong said the ordinance is not finalized at this point. Its contents might change, depending upon the subcommittee results. Ms. Boring asked why no more than one-third of the houses can have garages facing the front. Mr. Ezell said that was proposed in the text. Ms. Boring said she would like that changed. She did not see how the side loading garages will help. Mr. Cline asked if the ten-foot versus four-foot protrusion made any difference. Mr. Fishman said four-feet was fine. Mr. Cline said the product lines need to be redesigned to work. Mr. Cline said the text said no more than one-third will have a garage that faces the street that protrudes more than four feet in front of the house. The others will have aside-load garage or one that protrudes less than four feet beyond the front plane of the house. Mr. Schmidt said the idea was to get the homes facing the street, and it is called an eyebrow detail. Ms. Salay said it has a very urban feeling and it closes in the streetscape. Mr. Schmidt thought the eyebrow added character to the street but will change it. Mr. Cline said they would eliminate the five lots indicated previously and remove one additional lot wherever the Commission desired. Ms. Boring asked if the three lots along the northern edge could be eliminated, and Mr. Fishman agreed that would ~be beneficial. Mr. Cline did not think that would increase the vista. You would be looking at the backs of the houses. Mr. Schmidt understood that the objection was that the openspace was buried behind the houses, but he did not think dropping those three lots would help. Those rear lots are very valuable because they front on a park. Mr. Schmidt said his clients are willing to drop these three lots. There would then be approximately 300 feet of mixed access. He said they could drop the one close to the woods. Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Cline agreed to eliminate six lots. Mr. Lecklider asked why staff recommended approval of this application in light of its density. Mr. Ezell said this design was compelling, and traffic calming is a big issue in neighborhoods. The open space plan is also quite generous, with a half mile of buffer. He said the Wow features being added to the front are very expensive and very nice. He thought this plan incorporates a number of "interior Wows" as well and is an excellent design. Mr. Lecklider said ideally he wanted a density closer to 1.5 du/ac, but this was acceptable. He appreciated the points made by Mr. Cline and Mr. Ezell about the plan. He also appreciated the elimination of lots to increase park visibility and the commitment to natural materials. Mr. Eastep said it was still too dense and should be limited to 1.5 du/ac. He thought more wide lots were needed for side-loaded garages. He appreciated the natural materials. Mr. Eastep said the whole north section could be reconfigured. He could not vote positively for this plan. Mr. ,Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 13 Fishman agreed and said the density was a problem. It will set a precedent for development to the west. He complimented the designer. The density needs to be solved. Ms. Boring said the lot sizes should be increased and the layout should remain. She appreciated the work done and said there were some very positive figures. She agreed with Mr. Eastep. Ms. Boring noted that the Wow proposal was not final and can not be the basis for density. Mr. Sprague thought the lot sizes should be increased. He praised the work of the applicant and the staff. He noted that even if six lots were eliminated, it still was not at the level of density ~" consistent with the mandates and directions given from Council. '~'" Mr. Peplow preferred a lower density, but he found this to be acceptable. He did not want lots eliminated for the sake of eliminating them. He wanted more visibility of the park. He liked the layout and its internal features. He wanted wider lots to solve the side load garage problem Mr. Salay said the Community Plan shows Wyndham Village with 2.64 du/ac. Mr. Lecklider did not think that was accurate. She said it was a mistake to only look at density. This subdivision has more amenities than several others, and it falls within the recommended density limits. Ms. Boring said the problem with density is that density is tied to everything else. It affects the school system, level of service, traffic, etc. Bernard Scheurle, of Violet Veil Court appreciated the density debate. He said access through Wyndham Village may be an issue. The traffic flow from Wyndham Village through this newer development to the SR 161 access should be studied. He said his property backed up to the ditch. There are quite a few nice trees. Mr. Lecklider said these were to be wet detention ponds. Mr. Scheurle said the appearance of the dry detention pond in Wyndham Village was bad. He was also concerned about the location of the bikepath. Mr. Hahn said there was a dry basin south of Violet Veil Court. He said the bikepath is farther west, away from the rear of Mr. Scheurle's property. Mr. Scheurle asked that any bikepath construction be sensitive to the existing mature landscaping. Mr. Lecklider agreed. Mr. Schoby, the owner, said several developers were interested in his land. He said Dublin wants single-family housing with a density of less than two du/ac. His Post Road access disappeared since the last review. Although he met with the engineers, there was no driveway included. He currently has two driveways in use. He was told by the engineer that he would have to buy other property to get access just to sell this land. He said this was an additional expense and unfair to him. He said a buffer for corn and bean fields is not needed and it was another extra expense. He said alert-turn lane was not necessary. He said this has caused him real hardships. They were trying to do a 1031 property exchange, but the other could not wait for years. He said it is expensive to extend contracts, and he asked the Commission to consider his problem. Rob Meyer, Dominion Homes, said they did the best job they could. They appreciated Mr. Schmidt's design efforts, and they are sensitive to Mr. Schoby's frustration over the time it has taken. He agreed to all the conditions in the staff report. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 14 Mr. Meyer said they have been forthcoming where they can, but economics are an issue. They will not agree to drop lots simply for the sake of dropping them. He proposed dropping two more lots on the main entry street to provide a park vista and making the existing lots wider. This will reduce density and make the garage situation easier. The density will be 1.85 du/ac. Mr. Fishman said that was reasonable, and closer to the goal density of 1.5 du/ac. Mr. Fishman said the southern intersection (SR 161/US 33) could be very busy. Another lot should be eliminated to pull the subdivision away from the intersection. Ms. Boring thought those three lots should be eliminated in the southern section and the remaining ones could be made wider. Mr. Cline agreed to eliminate a total of nine lots at strategic locations to address valid issues including vistas to the park and the southern leg of the road. Mr. Eastep said the materials should not include a masonry finish trowelled on the foundation. He was concerned about the durability. Mr. Meyer said he will remove that from the text. Mr. Cline said the parking setback on Page 8 will match Code and they will alternate side load garages. Mr. Cline repeated items as agreed: natural materials on vertical surfaces; nine specific lots removed; eliminate the foundation section, remove the parking setback; and alternate the side load garages to different sides of the lots so that the garages are not on the same side. Mr. Eastep said he appreciated the applicant's flexibility. He wants Dublin to be a premier community, not just Any City, USA. The other Commissioners concurred. Mr. Lecklider appreciated everyone's efforts to make this another fine development. Ms. Boring made the motion for approval because the plan conforms to the Community Plan, provides an extension of the Red Trabue Nature Reserve, provides interconnection with surrounding neighborhoods and Hyland-Croy Road, and enhances the scenic character along Perimeter Drive and Post Road, with 19 conditions: 1) That the applicant work with staff to coordinate the entrance road to the future Liggett Road intersection along Perimeter Drive; 2) That the western buffer plan be used as a guide, and that a more detailed buffer plan including evergreens of various heights (6-12 feet) be submitted at preliminary plat; 3) That a note specifying that the adjoining western property is "outside of the City of Dublin's jurisdiction for planning and zoning" be indicated at preliminary plat, and that "Dublin City limit" be indicated along the length of the property line; 4) That the applicant demonstrate that open space areas, which include retention ponds will retain appropriate park/usability and access characteristics, subject to staff approval; 5) That a tree survey, preservation plan, and replacement plan be submitted at preliminary plat, including an agreement for control of vegetation along the Gorden property, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to indicate that no individual lot may have direct access onto Perimeter Drive and Post Road, and that access points shall be coordinated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; r~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 7, 2000 Page 15 7) That the site meet all City engineering requirements for utilities, including stormwater and floodplains; 8) That preliminary stormwater design analysis be in conformance with the City's stormwater management requirements and be provided at preliminary plat; 9) That an architectural diversity matrix be provided at preliminary plat; 10) That the text include the 60-foot right-of--way access to the church site, and that this be shown at preliminary plat; 11) That necessary text revisions for staggered front setbacks of 30-35 feet for lots with bikepaths, 25-30 feet front setbacks for all other lots, and all development standards mentioned in this report be provided, and also indicated later at preliminary plat; 12) That bikepath connections, bridges, and easements mentioned in this report be indicated at preliminary plat; 13) That specific ownership and maintenance for all amenities be established in the zoning text; 14) That atot-lot be designed and built, subject to staff approval; 15) That the plan be revised to reflect the conditions listed above at preliminary plat; 16) That the text be revised to eliminate the foundation requirement and the parking requirement and stick to Code; 17) That text be amended to eliminate G in the vinyl siding standards and to eliminate point G in exterior materials with respect to vertical surfaces; 18) That the text be revised to require that side load garage driveways are to be alternated so that they are not next to each other; and 19) That a total of nine lots be eliminated to bring the density down to approximately 1.85 du/ac in the manner agreed to at the meeting; to provide a larger vista to the northeast park and to make lots wider in the southern section. Mr. Cline agreed to these conditions. He noted that on text page 6, Exterior Materials Section, the natural materials that would be included as A through F materials. Mr. Fishman noted that five of the nine lots being eliminated are at the north end. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Ms. Boring, yes. (Approved 7-0.) ,. .August 23, 2000 t .*;: , ytMr ~ICyle Ezell ,; ~~:`~Ctty Of Dublin .x:5800 Shier Rings Road ==,Dublin, OH 43016-1236 RE::.. " ":Post Preserve ;Dear Kyle, +..~ Please accept this revised set of plans .for the Post Preserve project we are designing for Dominion Homes. A summary of the changes that have been made to the plans includes: 1. Main entry to the project has been changed, with access now coming off of the (future) re-aligned :Perimeter Drive (previously, the proposed access came off Post Road). This access point has been located midway between the (future) intersection with Post Road to the east and with Hyland-Croy Road to the west. As you will recall, this location was agreed upon in the meeting at your offices that included Jason Coffee, Chris Cline, Paul Hammersmith, Bobbie Clarke, yourself and myself on August 7, 2000. 2. The project entry has been re-designed to include the WOW elements that we discussed asappropriate-for this portion of Post/Perimeter Road. `Element include a water feature/pond, rail fencing, stone retaining walls and naturalistic plantings of perennials and wetland plants along die pond edge. 3. The detention .ponds to the north (along Gorden/tri-County ditch) have been resized to make the park area within the Trabue park extension more useable. In particular, the pond on the west side of the main entry drive has beenreduced in size, while'the pond in the northeast corner (south. of the woods) has been enlarged. 4. We have included asite-specific landscape buffer design solution for the west boundary against the Gorden farm,'as requested by Bobbie Clarke. All of the other features of the plan remain as previously proposed, which includes the development standards text that Chris Cline submitted and the traffic calming features. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, - f G Schm d ASLA AICP as1' ~ , Schmidt Land Design ~ ~~ c; ~~ ~~ ll L~ cc: Rob Meyer, Dominion Homes Chris Cline, Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin /~(j~ 2 4 2~~~ Jason Coffee, RD Zande Associates -~S7 00-0572 Rezoning 3763 North High Street Columbus, Ohio 43214 t 61~ Post Preserve +~ Preliminary Plant List QTY. SYM[30L I30TAN1CAL NAMf_ CUMMON NA1~iC SIZt: CONDITION LARGE DECIDUOUS TREES 8 Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2" cal. B&B 7 Elm Ulmus parvifolia Lacebark Elm 2" cal. B&B 8 Tul Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 2" cal. B&B 6 Ald Alnus glutinosa Black Alder 2" cal. B&B 6 Swt Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum 2" cal. B&B UNDERSTORY TREES 14 Aml Amelanchier arborea Seviceberry 6-8' ht. B&B 13 Haw Crataegus punctata `Ohio Pioneer" Dotted Ha~~~thorn 6-8' ht B&B I 1 Mal Malus "Prariefire" Prariefire Crabapple 6-8' ht. B&B EVERGREEN TREES 18 Aus Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 6-8' ht. B&B 16 Nor Picea abies Norway Spruce 6-8' ht. B&B 19 Col Picea pungens Colorado Spruce 6-8' ht. B&B SHRUBS ] 9 Arr Viburnum. dentatum Arrowood Viburnum 2 gal. Cont. 23 Crn Viburnum trilobum American Cranberrybush 2 gal. Cont. 22 Brk Viburnum burkwoodi Burkwood Viburnum 2 gal. Cont. 24 Gry Cornus racemosa Gra}~ Twig Dogwood 2 gal. Cont. 25 Hny Lonicera fragrantissima Winter Honeysuckle 2 gal. Cont. POST PRESERVE- WEST LANDSCAPE BUFFER PLAN Prepared for Dominion Homes Schmidt Land Design Scale: l"=20.0' 00.0572 Rezoning Post Preserve _~ ~ d Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin 1 NCORPORATED ' David S. Blaugrund Attorneys and Counselors at Law Emily J. Lewis Sharon Cason-Adams Roxi A. Liming Christopher T. Cline 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Steven A. Martin Lawrence H. Cohen Michael C. Mentel David J. Demers Phone: 614/764-0681 Fax: 614/764-0774 Sharon L.R Miller Beverly J. Farlow Direct Dial: 614-923-3132 Charles R Munoz John W. Herbert Marc E. Myers Steven E. Hillman E-mail: ctc@bhmlaw.net Stephen P. Postalakis John S. Jones Teri G. Rasmussen David S. Kessler Carol D. Weiss August 14, 2000 Mitchell Banchefsky Schottenstein, Zox and Dunn ~~ 41 South High Street #2600 Columbus, Ohio 43215 re: The Post Preserve (#00-0572 Dublin) Dear Mitch: You and I have previously discussed the outlines of the commitment Dominion Homes will make regarding acquisition of right of way through the Gordon property in order to line up the Post Preserve entrance road on Perimeter Drive with the City's realignment of Liggett Road. Basically, the City will take the land with a quick take provision (assuming Mr. Gordon does not sell voluntarily) and Dominion will reimburse the City for its costs. Dominion will be permitted temporary access from Post or Perimeter, if necessary, until the permanent access point for the right-of--way is available for use. So that there is a clear understanding of what is involved, I would appreciate your writing to me to describe your understanding of the details of this transaction. Ie, what elements of cost will the City expect Dominion to reimburse? Since I will be out of the country from August 17 to September 2, I would appreciate it if you would copy attorney Rob Meyer at Dominion Homes (SSO1Frantz Road, Dublin, 43017). Last week I met again with Mr. Gordon and we discussed again the possibility of Dominion acquiring the right of way directly. However, we have not yet progressed to the point where I can say that action by the City will not be necessary to acquire the right- of-way. I will continue to use my best efforts to that end, but, we will need the guarantee of action by the City to ensure the access. CTC:pq Very truly yours Christopher T. Cline 00-0572 Rezoning Post Preserve One Cleveland Center 1375 E. 9th Street, Suite 950 Cleveland, Ohio 44l 14 Telephone 216/621-6501 Fax 216/621-6502 MICCIIELL II. BAI9C1'IEFSKY ~~ 61U462-2274 F MM,: A®AHCHFtSICY~sID.COM S~II~ SCHOTTENSTEIN. ZOX f6 DUNN ---~- A Ltga! Projeuio~a! A.uociatiaa The Huntington Center 41 South High Street -Columbus, Ohio 43215-6106 Telephone 614/462-2700 -Fax 614/462-5135 Website www.szd.com August 23, 2000 Christopher T. Cline, Esq. Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500 Dublin, OH 43017 Re: The Post Preserve (#00-0572 Dublin) Dear Chris: Bank One Towers 8044 Montgomery Road, Suite 700 Cincinnati, Ohio 45236-2926 Telephone 513/792-2730 Thank you for your letter of August 14, 2000. This letter will serve to confirm that we did discuss the above-referenced development and I did indicate that the City in the past has utilized its power of eminent domain to acquire necessazy public access and improvements which aze made a condition of approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, subject to full ~- reimbursement by the developer. However, I do not recall any discussion of temporary access from Post or Perimeter as you referenced in the first paragraph of your aforementioned letter. These issues should be resolved with the Planning and/or Engineering staff. In terms of the details of reimbursement for any eminent domain proceedings, it is the City's policy to request reimbursement for all costs related to such acquisition. These include, but are not limited to, appraisals, costs charged by a professional negotiator, legal fees charged by this office, and all costs relative to litigation. As we discussed, these fees aze billed at exactly the costs incurred by the City and/or this office. Further, reimbursement for legal fees would be at the City's discounted rate, which is $120 an hour, excluding litigation. 00-0572 Rezoning Post Preserve SCHOTTENSTEIN, ZOX b DUNN A Lega/ Projessiortal Association Christopher T. Cline, Esq. August 23, 2000 Page 2 . Obviously, it is our sincere hope that Dominion will be able to resolve this matter directly with the property owner, thus alleviating the need for any such process and its related expenses. If you have questions regarding any of the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mitchell H. Banchefsky MHB:bg cc: Mr. Timothy C. Hansley (w/encl.) Mr. Frank Ciarochi (w/encl.) Mr. Balbir Kindra (w/encl.) Ms. Bobbie Clazke (w/encl.) Robert A. Meyer, Jr., Esq. (w/encl.) F:lszd~Banchcfm~DUBLINUetter cline OS 22 00 355050.1.doc ~~-~57Z Rezoning Post Preserve REZONING APPLICATION 99-0832 -THE POST RESERVE RECOMMENDATION HEARING OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION March 2, 2000 STATEMENT O F JOHNSTON H. MEANS 7660 HYLAND CROY ROAD 614-873-3044 We reside on just under 33 acres east of Hyland Croy Road. Our land drains by reason of a sixteen inch buried the that crosses the subject site. Our conoem is that no action be authorized which disrupts or tends to disrupt this drainage. Of course, the buried the also serves to drain the land of others to the northwest. Thank you for your consideration of our concern. Respectfully su)b~mitted, J nston H. Means FILE COPY n~~~o~ oo_os~Z Rezoning Post Preserve (:1'1'1 OF DC[1LI\ Division of Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road Dablin, Ohio 13016-1236 Phoae/100:fi14-761-6550 fax: 614-161-G566 Web Site: www.du6lin.oh.us PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JULY 20, 2000 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 6. Rezoning Application 00-0572 -Post Preserve Location: 78.33 acres located on the north side of Post Road, approximately 750 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification). Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Proposed Use: Anew subdivision of 156 lots and 23.6 acres of park. Applicants: Dominion Homes, 5501 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Albert Lee and Florence Schoby, Trustees, 6233 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Pastor David Gross, Northwest Assembly of God, 7055 Avery Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Christopher T. Cline, Jr., Blaugrund, Herbert & Martin, 5455 Rings Road, Suite 500, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To table this application as requested by Mr. Cline. VOTE: 5-0. RESULT: This application was tabled. STAFF CERTIFICATION K e Ezell enior Planner 00-0572 Rezoning Post Preserve _ .. ~____ cfT~- of UCfll,l\ nsion of Plaradng JO Shier-Rings Road ~ti Oha 43016-1236 f'hone/1D D: 614-761-b S SO Fax: 614-761566 Web Site: www dublin.ah.us DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION March 16, 2000 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning Application 99-0832 -The Post Preserve Location: 104.752 acres located on the north side of Post Road, approximately 750 feet east of Hyland-Croy Road. Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification). Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. Proposed Use: A subdivision with i91 lots with 18.56 acres of park and a 27.5 acre church site. Applicants: Pastor David Gross, Northwest Assembly of God, 7055 Avery Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; Albert and Florence Schoby, 6233 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and William and Rita Syar, 7156 Post Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To disapprove this rezoning application, including the church proposal. [The church *~*, would not make commitments as to its future architecture.] The Commission recommends that the church site be submitted as a separate application. The proposed residential density of the .;,~ balance of the site should be lowered to match the Community Plan VOTE: 5-1. RESULT: This application was disapproved after a lengthy discussion. It will be forwarded to City Council with a negative recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION 1 ~. ,/~ ~, ;~ -- - ~~ ~im Littleton Planner 00-0572 Rezoning Post Preserve ~GSo-cb~~1~~ - Cp~~lt1 h Olaf asoE~zx~r,s -++d ,E20 Z9Z 119 '+ VG ,OOZ = „l ~31V75 N1b01V mitt oiyp'srgwrpa OOOI I 5 4aM V4Vi E9[C 009 ~~ N97SNQ @IY4 I ~ p°~l O ,LQI~ OOOZ 7 ~a9wanoi.l :paslro~ OOOZ'b ~a9~ap :pa~~ y' OOCZ'bl. ~agwaiAaS "..:I .~IrI I. ,_ r,If. ~1~2I~S~2~d .LSOd ~. ~~ 9L'~Z~ ~304dS N3d013N ~oe O'Z z :eea.iy uoilua~ia4 - '~~ 9L'SZ~ ~30bdS N3d0 SSOd~J ~puod do % 09 Sapnloul) 'op SI~Z { ::a6p2uo.l j peon MOM 'ae 056{ :an~aeaa~ epoo,M, 'oe lt'bt$ uoieualx3 ~a~A ange~i pad ~~ 9L~~Z~ ~43aIG0?~d 30bdS N3d0 ~oe 9Z'8 = 54l " 49C' ~'~ L9't = g~"8L x ZC' ~~ Z8'6$ ~a3?JIn03d 304dS N3d0 ~~~/np i?9~1~ ~,U ISN3a 103f'Odd SS021~J ~'~ ~S1C~ ~S # 1b101 '~~ E08'8L$ ~b3?1b 311S 14101 dlba X115 Hlbd 3`19 - Wb21~JOdd ,MOM, d01?14d S4 aNOd J.?J1N3 'Ob Sl'Z $ 304dS N3d0/N21bd ,1?11N3 ~~ ~ `~ i , ~~0~1165'O 'Oil 5311?1ad03d `Al'J I-. _. _. I__. _.. ___.. ~ LJ o say-~lL 'O dlli~`.J3Nl?1Vd O311WI 1 if 9 II~ O~ u~~d ~uau,~dojanaQ _ t~l` _ --_ - __-~ ('fr /_- +_\ I'.,~ ,_ I I ~I' ~~ ~,--,, _~~~.~ I~ NIW .09 SS3~~4 ~--~ {{ I ~~ 1-=- ~4 ('M'0~?~ W0213 ,S9-,O~') H14d 3`19 9NOlb ~I S`~049135 ~JNlalln9 a32J39~b1S ~ iII J ,J t J I ti n- I~~~~yI ~rj (51141301 33S) „SN3321~J INIW„ - ~~` ~ I, ~ ~ ~~~ SS3004 `~214d --4- ~v,~~~ -__-_~\i r , ~ \ Hlbd 3`19 ti ~ ~C' 'Ob lCt~t~ ~ (NOISN31X3 ~d4d 3n9b?1143?1) xavean9vbL \ _ 304dS N3d0/`~?1bd a3a I'w i `~~ '~~ ___ --- 11WI~ OZ+ .lbMa0013 _ _-- - - _ . ____ ~- Nlblda0013 ?143,1 OOt r ~,30b1d `~21bd„ Ol N01103NN00 Hlbd 3VI9 Cl(XJH~S ~~ `~ f ~,ad ooe~94 ~ N3Ob09'9 N3bYNM 0 ~~ 'Ob ~'L $ aNOd (S1i4134 33S) ~3d3n9 3dbOSdNb~ 1bN011ia4b SN4143W 43dbOSaNb~ H11M a?1bG31n09 ~~M'O'?1 WO?1~ .OE-.GZ) S`~Ob913S 9Nialln9 43?J39~J41S - 'M'0'?1 .08 -1S3M Ol ab02! 9n1S SN41a3W 43d40SaNbl H11M 4?1b~31n09 - 1S3M Ol ab0?J 9n1S - (514134 33S) 31Od10 OId3b?Jl (NOISN31X3 ~Idbd 3n9b?11 43d) 30bdS N3d0!`~?1bd - M'0'21.09 - aNOd NOIlN3134 ALIT NI19lIO ~ ~ ~ - \~ 101 101 - --- - _ I ~ f :.. ~.. _ ~ ) ~ ~ i-~!_ _ I ~ 1 3dOb O'l ~ i I. __ I I ~ 1S3M Ol ab0?J 9fi1S ONOd NOI1N3130 (~ob/na ~oz ~ulsN3a) -- ~f ~ _ ~ ~ _L I, _ ~ ~ --- t, a i I t L- - ('M'0'?1 WO?J3 .09-,9Z) 1N3WdOl3~3Q , ~ 1 + ~ ~ S`~049135 ~JNlali(19 a3d3~J9b15 J.?1n91S3M, ~. ,~a++ ~ 1 ~ lN~"HONI ~ ~I \ °e - \C ~ °' (du) log .oe - 1 ' -- I .l ~+~+ yes ° d /` ~ I I_ I ~_ ~ ~ ~ I ~~~ A I ~ i ~ 1 _J-- J_ .. _ ~ ~ ~ _ - ~- ~ ' _- ~_ ~~ ~~ _ _ JI~ .Iii. 6 ~ /~ f ,I ~ ~ ~~I ~ ~~~ ~~~',~ ll o p I~ ~~' ~ I~ 1 ~~ I I ~ ~ ,~ _~ II I ' ~~I ~~- IJI~ `all Iii Sa00M 9NI1SIX3 3G?13S321d Ob OS'6~ (3A?13S3dd 400M) (Ob/na 480'Z ~,111SN34) 30bdS N3d0/`~dbd 1N3WdOl3L3Q ,30b1d `~?Jbd, ~ ~ u ~ emu, _..__~,` ^ - 43433N S4 NOI1nlOS3?J I p H11M 31b213d000 IIIM 1Nb011dd4 'J.110 J.9 43NIW21313Q 39 Ol ~ ab0?J 113~J911 aNb?1313Wi?13d ~ d0 S1N3WN~JI~b 3?1n1n3 ~ '~ - L _' _.-~ i F r- 1 ~~ T 'I ;~r..,_ . a~~~~~~ ~~~~ x~ ~~LL ~ ~r~ ~C ~i ~~P~ .y~+ ~~ ~ ~! ~~ ~ ~~ .~ << 4 1 ~~ v 1 N ",a r V ~ ~~ ~, J" -~ `'~g ©`~i1`: ~~~'~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ y c air v;,~` Cry;- $ ~ ,` ~ ~`' F , o ~ 4 ~ v `~ c f ~y f ~ ~~~ ~ 4~ .~,.~ '~-;, ~ .$~~ ~" ~~ ~~ ~ II,, ~~~J11 i I,~~ '1~~; . r..i ~--~ U 4~ a cat N U O yW I rW rrT11 a F.., ~~ ^O^~N F~+~. w~,....r„ .gib:..,. -._~~ . um~ww~9ela ~mtw3. b'ZBZtl9 'w.d~/ WY4 Vat141Gy KQ QIi~IH oooz szzs~6w ~II,J+u ®.,, ~~2I~S~2Id ~I,SOd sjr~~aQ ~uau.~a~.~~ju~ ~.Z~u~ ~~=aS of roN ~~N Q~'02I .LSOd H.cva Byre J~vHasv .x sway N33aoa3n3 lltla~. NVIaJ.5303d 'a6e~dcq ~oyu 9uAwe a~uu uv+yw.e8oa xx+lddeyv~seµ csayw0alos?ntFmb wapvvay,.ayya sawl Ivwn alew uva s{uul la e.xwayi'auaayed auiwnuY w tlwna mn9u~aWe Sq 'e us lamlR!e8emeweroa arc lvyl up+vyvo Iwl>noan Heo.x nrl,aw.u.. ~~.»„ rw,m,~,,, ro auyv.ja w. yrnn,y, rvrow ayus., e>n~ ~...K,o,aa isavrraein~~w.xaan...MOM,. ~t doarvdrn S3[I~SOfl'1tl1N3 W V NNn~ 3JN3d Watld ONf10aVNaf1.1. ovoa 3ovJ.NOad 3JtldS N3d0 3Wtlad S3wOH --- -~- '~u.oy .Gloom p,..:xei u„q awe w~~i ;Ilep.l van~a~ is nae,.y.. aa~ wv+, m 1 u >m„ yewro, aMs 'VwoM auro m ~, r ,~„o.. mo,,., m.ye ~ ms ~erum~nq »pl io oxy <9 Pa»unw s 4 A x e 1 >w lwlat y p:vua v q~ 81nauet pnx Ie,nNO)oeaJR~ aie maual Ixra n1A al(IC-uuv! tl4hT TJQ!!YJ H: MD9Q . MOM ~ .0f [ tl01 MYd SYI S3JN33 ~roa tl~as 3'tcJ.s-wavy - ___ _ ~ - ~- __ __ Carta yd va~vt ~ fib °Jw1! 1 S1vSAl M,/ o Sit al'Gb.Npa.W 'rtd . 1 ~ ~NrI• ~(3~'~ ~ar7-,b _Yd2dJ5 QLj y ~ Jrl ~~ ~~~ "/I -~ 6a21N~tq'~:irl / yxy -- \, n'+vmr+azF3d- 4.ndfKefi33xl° j/~3- Ifl . X71 ~Y h~ ai9.4i ='-'~ ~ _~ - c I M~ ) nH A YNM~ i'gIG 4rolI - ~~ ' ~~~ Qb'i+,•al o l~ ,l.. ,. 1 - d auan,y zwu3 -axi--xa~. '~-l ""'`` ~-„(Iyij7 ~~~._~ r .A-.OZ=,d .alesg /o~nV~f 1ylfYdWVlia'J- uTS~nrr3~3d--J emft~ ~,no~i->ae i ~'-/?'IYItYfY3-d'3d --d-h'tl'J'lYL-V3WYYM4 -~~ QiyOq ~ ~~ T I 1 / 1~ h1tlJ3Q 3H51 N'J7S Aa.LN3 'al, an.ve. yee mep M+a+n,o~ rexyev lum•o .. n=.* ~ vaw=Ywae ~• ap.om m vawa+w a,e wmm gars,; qW W p~1aw, ss of pwapa awry 'tawTOrtw io aI,111+a+Mbai lup+aww e m vrmryaua pev ldwn ap~rodm8vad aylAgoW aya Mep V>~ IWnR OPWe ~1 aa. ~..,.®a.~.„ ',a,..~a.~x>va.Hy.,y,o roe quun va!81 v gars Wneeld amnM Nu.Bnyl <Na!4~ a8q ue anvq M adeVV w le~owlm ve vpoad p+xlanyeN ~sawrsvrnolrxdsa...Maa. aeu do.urva sn SONOd O3ZI'Jb'af1.I.tlN 533a.L.1.33aJ.5 S33aJ. ~JM.LSIX3 ~~.. .- 1wWMOR6 ~~1T3 8Y08'LiZILY rd .f ~'L9~L7plB 'rWtl w1S Vent V ~'~ N~~Q QINIH~S ,~'~z~s~tl ,~E~~~~:E1Ex, ~u. ~n ?I~S~2Id ,LSOd~ I saaTnaQ ~uiu.~i~~ at~~~~,.L 3'ItlaS DL 10N [~"Td ~'I~iii~ ~I33YN,L ~-rvJS oc,tDN ~.Ll NMtl'7 tl'~tl,t IOtM .9E) NtlF09W3dtlOSONYI +' ,f S6l11iMS SOOOOIJ30 FiJN9ff S7t?INN3M3d ('J'D .SS-6ti) (.LH013}i'N[YV:S) . ~NZ.I33N.LS S33N1 N7'3NON3A~ ~ . ('NIW ..Z) S73N.L HQVHS - . i - 3'TJNIJ JI.~IdVNl 5 ~y LY M `~ 37b'OS OJ..I,ON NOLLJ~S N~t12I1J IIIIL~I 'lItlJ34 d3S - NY'Id 3dYJS'QNV1 31JNIJ J1d3VlJ. - SHHlIJ.333tLLS Sf10f10U1J3t1 ~~o~Y%mW~ ro!~' yue s%uNlaY iq ware >wan w [aids eade asayy 'fraRa~ggs~au ay, }e ~»; etuESAad aq1 amspea p pw~Hreap saxds undo aae seaw5{ ~vi}y'~Pianv,) 13'IVOS O,L,IpN) AId'Id I~I3~rJ IISIL~i .. ~„,~. ~. r 3'ib'OS O.L:LON 1~IOI.L~~S ~"I~2II~ ~Iddt~2i,L ~'~WlBp5:MN3 BBOS"LBZ'Ol9 :v~ E60 L9t-tls -aWd ~lzn anw ~arpw,go~ IMBS V8M WsN Este IMNR'£Z lsnBny ..~~n u.w'a i:'I Yl :O I,I. ~n2I~S~2~d ZSOd~ MJISBQ ANTI QIAIH~ II saatnaQ ~uiu.~I~~ a~~~~~ ~M3QtS 3iHJS QL lAN Aid'Id ~dd~S.L~~~I.LS +at3s a3a3~1s H:Llrli S3WOH ,S71Wb'd 37'JNIS ~•S) 7PitlM3QIS S3WOH A71N S33H1 !, 132LL 133N1S 5f10f1pIJ3Q dMV'I 33N1.L 3'iVaS 0110N NtrIQ~YrI i-LLIM ,L~~2IJ,S ~O.L~~TIO~