The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About54-00 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No 004 54-00 Ordinance No Passed AN ORDINANCE. ~1IL~OV~DING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR 3.56 ACRES ~OCAT'ED ON T IiE SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF WEST BRIDGE STREET .AND FRANKLIN STREET, FROM: PUD, PLANNED UN!T DEVELOPMENT DISTRIC'T', AND R-4, SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. (OLD DUBLIN TOWN CENTER II AND REVISED DUBLIN COMMUNITY CHURCH PLAN/CASE FILE N0.99-131Z). NOW, TH FORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Oliio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations ar_d procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this~Q~t day of d I~. , 2000. Mayor -Presiding Officer Attest: Clerk of Council Sponsor: Planrii;g Division 1 t~ h?RIn~)Y C8,'t`{~.~'gR;ft C!?taS 6{ t`r?' n:tnr(?',€?;3 3~,! City e' D:~b!`~) ~n orrOr sm t.sn tease ,oo;ta~~ in the d zca svi;., Saction 731.25 a. t;,a :~lia Revised Code. tlerk ;Council, DublRn, Qhio -y.r • SUN ~ 57 ~x DALE DR LIBRARY ~o~'~ D d ~ _ ~ d 0- ~ ~I 1 E2 0 ~ SCALE: SI TE ~ 1 "EQUALS 4QQ' ~ SY A~ A ~ ~ O ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ P4 OVER t~ =oxx ~ O axe ~ o OLD ~ ~P G ~ ~ ~ ~ g~o~ ~A~RFp ~ ~ ~+~~IpN ST 99-131 Z ~•7 ~ Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II _ 'II 1 I ~ I I I I I iI 1 III , „ I I I IN Illit i I I. ~ ' i R_2 ,I R ~ Li,~~i li R_4 j ~ C I I ~i~;.,il i it I dillll i II i ~ i, li~ll~~I.'~ .I III i I z I ~ ~ ~ t~ I j;,,, I I ~ - i SITE -4 L ~ ~ I s I ~ f IIIIIII:,,:~, ~ i ~ o,~, IIIII~ILII ~I~,., ~I ' ~ - I II IIIII!li I lip', I~ ~ ' . 'll II i III IiIIIiC;;; '.I ~ , 1 I~~ ........II..~ ~,IIIi, I I I I~ I IIIIII I w~ ~ I~ i illlll ~ , ~ i II ,~~~~~~I , 'I, , I I' i outh St . R-2 I, I' itl I I ~ ~ I iim iiiiii I ~ I~ I...II . , . ~ I I.L. _ hn ~I,o~t ~,II~ ~II~, I I I i I I II,IIIr ~ St 144 I, ~ , Short Iii„~I,~,I I,IU:,? I II;P;U D 'I i ~ ~ li. I'I~I,I I~I,~II~I ~I, ' 99-1312 I~_II I, i III .~l y,, ,~i il, , , Rezonin A lication 4,~;'i;ii!!~jli~l!~ Old Dublin Town Center II ~'ii t ~ as ~n~_>,;a.. i ~ EXHIBIT "B" . r:.:; . / REZONING APPLICATION (Code Sectien 153.234) EXPIRE CI'I'1' OF llIBLI Ordinance No. ~D d 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 City Council 1st Reading 3 b PhonelTDD:614/761-6550 Fax: 614/761-6566 City Council Public Hearing City Council Action FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ? Amount Received: Application No: PAZ Date(s): P&Z Acticn: q- 3 Receipt No: MIS Fee No: Date Received: ^ I ~ Received By: Type of Request: ? PLEASE SU6MIT TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS - I'LE:\S13 PRINT - ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION ar,d ~NC~ CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION ? Composite Plan(Code Section 153.053`, ~ IzOR MEETING ON 3 Q ? Preliminary Development Plan (Code Sectien 153.05oj ? Cther (Describe) _ (FROFEI~TY INFORP~IATION v.~ i~TAX ID NO/ ~ Parcel Size'.: _ GISTRiCT PARCEL NO: (Acres) 3.56 !jI Prnc~.rp~ Ar+;-.;ress~ it Pr~p,_~rty t_u~:,iticn: Southeast corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street to Mill Lane/West Alley and including Sells Alley. i ~ Si~h~ of StracL (N, S E VV) ~ r.... t`d~?arest Intersection: Bridge Street and Franklin Street ~ . D ~~tmce from Nearest Intersection: at interSectlori N, W from Nearest Inlcr. ~~rtion L ~ inn Existing Land Use/Development: , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ Parking lot at corner intersection. ~ Si le famil residence behind the existi rki lot and alo Franklin tr i ` I trl~n_:r~l L,rn~i UsuD~~br~lnpmrnl New building approximately 10,450 square feet for first floor coRmerci~l r and second floor usi office. First floor restaurant. _ H~~;crnrig E11;I~ai~~.~tum i i , 1 ~ ~ ~ CITY OF DUBLIN EXHIBIT "B" Current or Existing Zoning District: ,Requested Zoning Cistrict: No. of Acres to be Rezoned: PUD @ corner PUD @ corner R~+ @ lot behind the existing p(~ @ lot behind the existing 3.56 ppaar itt11~~ o an a ong r in Par ing $TATENIENT: State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity. See reverse side. STATEMENT: State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan. See reverse side. PREVIOUS APPLICATION? Has an application for rezoning the property been denied by the City Council within the last hvo (2) years? YES ? NO iF YES, WtiEN? State the basis of reconsideration: I I IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COMPOSITE OR PRELIh11NARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES ~ NO ? IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES I~ NO ? ~ ~ 11. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ? 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: J~ ~JCi-)IBJT L~~g,il description of the property to be rezoncxl consists of C, page+(s). PLAN REQUIREMENTS: 3 1999 ? 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24" X 36") SHOWING: The site and all lanii 500 tent beyond the boundarios b North ,urr~w ,Ind h~u s~:,ti~~ CITY 0 F D U B L I N c_ Existin~t ~rndi(ons (Ro,rds, lu~ildiny::, v~Klr~latiun,tuho~~rrl~hy, juiisdictirnal lxnrnd,arirs, utilitit~s, etc.) d. F'rol~<;~rv1 Uses (Re~~lion+il transportation systam, denr~ities, # of dwellin~ls, buildinry'unit types, square oo ages gar ~ ~ s ~ c, Fxistinrl ,end i?rrposrsl zonin~7 district txwnd+arires Rrtonin~t Al~plu;.rtion -101 ; 09/?&`99 I'.c~c . ~~l ` w~+ • , ,e • EXHIBIT "B" f. Size of the site in acres/square feet; and g. All property lines, street rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries. ? 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATCR THAN 11" X 17") ? 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20") Showing contiguous property owners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. III. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. PROPERTY OWNER (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE See attached list. i I p C~C~dd~ UEC - 3 1999 C TY OF DUBIiN Run~nin~1 Al,plir,ation PLA-108 D~t~~ 09/2Pi39 1'.+ ~r ~ d - EXHIBIT "B" ,~,;vl. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of Current Property Owner(s): Dublin CoRm~nlt Church -United Church of Christ Mailing Address: (street. city, state, Zip Code) 36 Franklin Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Daytime Telephone: (614) 889-1026 Fax: (614) 791-0297 Name of Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): 'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. Paul Phillips Maiiing Address: (street, City, state. zip cede) Re/Max Achievers, 6235 A Perimeter Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43017 Daytime Telephone: (614) 336-9400 Fax: (614) 336-9415 Which of the above is the primary ccntact person? Paul Phillips V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property de:~:ribed in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER The City cf Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth cf the City cf Cublin and northwest Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part cf said facilities available to the applicant until sane future date. The Applicant/Owner herE~y acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by lf~e Dublin Planrnng and Zoninr~ Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide f°sscntial sa~rvices such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Applicant. VII. OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE 1, Dublin Cotinunity Church -United Church of Christ ,the owner and applicant, hereby authorize Patrick M. Grabill to act as my repre5e.ntative and agent in all matters pert~ning to the processing and approval of this application including modifying the project, and I agme to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent. Signature of Ct it Property Ow r: Date: I - Si re of Current Property Owner: Date: VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT ~ F,,, s_, ' DEC 'a Rr+trmirnt Application ~U~~ 3 P -108 Daha 0912&i99 _vD CITY OF DIJBLIN I'.r~~~ ~t ,.I . EXHIBIT "B" STATE OF Ohio COUNTY OF Franklin I Patrick M. Grabill ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached e~d-iibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant or ~ Date: Authorized Representative: / ~7 y/C~' ubscribed and sworn to before me this - day of , 19 w~,:,~ Notary Public MARY A. BRUMMEL NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE pc Oii10 11YCOA9~ISSION EXPIRES OCT. 10, 2000 w~+ r------ I ~ i; - 3 i~99 i CITY OF DUBLIN FILE C~ q~~l3i ~ e~.'3~_~~oninq Ai~i~licah~m P,uin 5 ~~f 5 PIA- 108 09/2fL'99 _ . ~ .u.v ~ _ ~x~ ~ *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR ~~~n~n~~~~~unu~~~n~~n~~~~n~~n~~nu~~u~~~~~u~u~~~~ ~~~i~~n~~~~~nim~~~n~~m~~m~~~~t~~~~i~~~n~~~~nn~~~~~ GUY INVESTMENT CO LTD SHEPHERD LAND HOLDING CO 24 N High St 80 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-1131 Dublin, OH 43017-1145 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0006 ~~~~~~n~~i~~unn~~~ni~~n~~u~~~~~uu~~~n~n~~~nn~n~~ ~i~i~~n~~~~~nm~~~~~n~n~~~~u~~i~u~~~~~u~~~i~n~~~~~~~~ SCHULTHEIS RAYNE ELAINE WILAND 40-42 Franklin St 38 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-1105 Dublin, OH 43017-1145 **±~'"'"`AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0001 i~~~~~i~nu~~~u~~n~~~i~~~~u~~ui~~n~~i~n~i~n~~~~ ~~~u~n~~~~~utu~~~~u~~n~~~m~~~~nu~n~i~i~u~i~i~~~u~ JO~rf & HERMANNA GUY MATTHEW & DIANNE BARNHART 22 S High St 55 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1133 Dublin, OH 43017-1104 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0001 (~~u~n~~~~~nuu~~~u~~n~~~~~~~~~~nn~n~i~~~i~~~n~~~~i) ~~~n~~~~~~~~uuu~~~n~~n~~~~n~~~~nn~i~n~~~n~~n~u~~~ CHESTER & MARSHA HALL KATHRYN HAYDOCY 59 Franklin St 56 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1104 Dublin, OH 43017-1105 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0001 ~i~n~n~~~~~nnu~~~ni~n~~~~n~~~~~ni~~~u~~u~~nu~~~~~ ~~~~~~n~~i~~n~m~~~~n~ui~~~u~~~~nu~~~~~u~~~~n~~~ni~ JOHN & SUE STROEFER TIMOTHY & KIlVIBERLY MOLONEY 60 Franklin St 80 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1105 Dublin, OH 43017-1105 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0001 (~~n~~~~~i~~nnn~~~n~~ui~~u~~~~~un~~~i~u~n~~ni~u~~ ~~~n~n~~~~~nnn~~~u~~u~~~u~~~~~un~u~~n~u~~~u~~n~ MARY BAILEY JOHN & KATHLEEN PIERCE 86 Franklin St 85 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1105 Dublin, OH 43017-1104 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0001 ~i~~~~~~~~unn~~~n~~ni~~n~~~~~~u~~i~~~~~ui~n~~~~~~~ ~~~n~n~~i~~~nn~~~~~~i~~n~~n~~~~~iin~n~~~~u~~~~u~i~i~ a LIAM & KATHRYN LEVERING CLAUDIA PERRY 9~"~'ranklin St 95 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1105 Dublin, OH 43017-1104 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0001 ~~~n~n~~~~~unn~~~u~~n~~~~i~~~~~n~~~i~i~~ni~~n~~n~~) ~i~~~~n~~~~~nnn~~~n~~n~~~~i~~~~~nn~~n~~nn~~~~~~~~~~ RUTH MOFFITT PAULINE JOHNSON 100 Franklin St 105 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1105 Dublin, OH 43017-1106 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR 6-~t- - (~~u~~i~~i~~~nn~~~~u~~n~~~n~~~n~~u~~~~n~~n~~~~~~ni~ ~~~~~~n~~i~~nn~~~~~u~~m~~n~~~~~n i~ ~~~i~~~~~~ U GEORGE & ZORA EGER R C SMITH ~ 35-39 S High St 32 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-1132 Dublin, OH 43017-1145 d E~ ~ 3 i~~9 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR i,i..i„n.n......ui,,,i~„n,,,~i„i,i,n,,,i„i,,,nn,,,i i,i„i~,ii,n,,,,,,iii,,,i,,,n,,,n,n,,,,,u„~,~~,c„aF DUBLIN BRUCE & LILLIAN GRAHAM CONGREGATIONAL CHURC 41 W Bridge St 81 W Bridge St ~ "~s Dublin, OH 43017-1126 Dublin, OH 43017-1167 ~L E ~~z ~QJ~~1~ _ *****AUTOCR **C0 *****AUTOCR **0006 ~~~n~n~~~~~nuu~~~~n~u~~~m~~u~~u~~~~~~nu~~nm~~~ ~~~n~u~~~~~nnu~~~m~n~~~n~~~n~~~u~~~~i~~~~ii~u~~u~ JAMES & TINA ZTVKOVICH G & S PROPERTIES & SANFORD J SOLOMON 6-12 S High St 38 S High St Dublin, OH 43017-1133 Dublin, OH 43017-1133 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0006 ~i~n~u~~~~~u~m~~~n~~n~~~ui~~~u~~~ni~n~~i~~n~~~~~~~ ~~~n~n~~~~~n~m~~~ui~m~~u~~~~~~n~~~~~~n~~n~~~n~~~~ 37 WEST BRIDGE STREET LLC CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF DUBLIN 37 W Bridge St 81 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-2117 Dublin, OH 43017-1167 **'AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0006 Ili~~uiiu~~~u~~~~i~~~n~~~~ui~l~~l~~~~il~l~i~l~l~l ~i~n~n~~~~~nnn~~~n~~u~~~~n~~n~~~~~~~~u~i~.~~nin~~~) Dt~,,,,,,IN COMMUNITY CHURCH CTTY OF DUBLIN 59 Franklin St 20 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-1104 Dublin, OH 43017-1127 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0006 ~~~n~u~~~~~nun~~~n~~u~~~~n~~u~~n~~~n~~~~~i~~u~n~~ ~~~u~u~~~~~unn~~~u~~ni~~~u~~n~~ni~~~ni~~~~~uu~~~~ BEN JACOBY & J Co-Trs Betty JOHN KILBURY & K Brooks Cathy 58 S High St 16 N High St Dublin, OH 43017-1133 Dublin, OH 43017-1131 *****AUTOCR **0001 *****AUTOCR **0006 ~~~n~u~~~~~uu~~~~~n~~u~~~~u~~~~nu~n~~n~~i~i~~~u~~~ ~~~n~~i~~~~~nnn~~~m~n~~~n~~~i~~~n~~~n~~~~~~n~u~~~~ CHARLES WOLPERT J A PRICE 75 Franklin St 24 S High St Dublin, OH 43017-1104 Dublin, OH 43017-1133 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0001 ~~~n~n~~i~~unn~~~u~~u~~~n~~~ui~~~n~n~~~n~~~n~~~~) ~~~u~n~~~~~nnn~~~u~~~n~~u~~~~~nn~~~~~~u~~i~tu~~i~~ SIEGBERT & RENATE ALLESPACH BILLIE PATRICK 55 S High St 49 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-2118 Dublin, OH 43017-1104 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0001 ~~~'ii~~i~~unn~~~u~~n~~~in~~n~~ni~i~n~i~n~~u~~~i~ ~~~n~n~~~~~nnn~~~u~~n~~~~n~~~~~in~~i~i~~n~~~~i~u~~~ H' ARLENE MCDORMAN EDITH STEBELTON 2:~High St 65 Franklin St Dublin, OH 43017-1132 Dublin, OH 43017-1104 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0006 (i~n~n~~~~~unn~~~ni~u~~~n~~~i~~~ni~~ui~~ni~~~~i~~~) ~~~n~n~~~~~u~~~~~~~n~~n~~~n~~~~~n~~~~~u~~~~~~n~~~~n~ THOMAS CULLEN WANGO INVESTMENTS 32 S High St 50 W Bridge St Dublin, OH 43017-1133 Dublin, OH 43017-1145 *****AUTOCR **0006 *****AUTOCR **0006 (~~u~n~~i~~unn~~~n~~n~~~~n~~u~~~~~~ni~n~~n~i~~~~~~ ~~~u~n~~i~~uun~~~u~~u~~ ~ ~ ~ i n LS MICHAEL RAY LTD DUBLIN MARATHON ~E~ _ _ 48-52 S High St 21 W Bridge St ~ _ Dublin, OH 43017-2119 Dublin, OH 43017-112 - 14y~ U E C ~ 3 CITY OF ~JUB(_IN ~ ~ E CCP~1 ~I ~J~~`~ _ . Nl ~!-~,~~c-1a~~ 1~~ 4~ P.1~2!k~~ ~~~18(T ~ Exhibit ~ (Page 1 of 2) heal estate situated in the County of Franllin, in t bed ast foll~ws~~ and in the City of Dui~lin and bounded atld descr Parcel t , L3eing Lots Numbers Nitzc (9) ~1d Tea (10) ad dEincated tt)onLlc ~corlded pla thereof e Coven of Dublin as said lots ara numbered an p of rccord in peod Book 40, Page 89, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Olz'so and part of Davis Alley vacated; EXCEPTED 'i II~REFROM the following proms scs: tieing parts oFl,ots Ntunbcrs Nine (9) and 7ert {10) of Llind Solis Addition to the Town of Dublin as said Lots are numbered and delincazed upon the recorded plat thereof of rccord in nec;d Book 40, Page 89, Recorder's Office, Franklin coutZty, Ohio and part of Davis Alley as by vacation thereof, it became atmexed to adjacent property, said parts of I .ors 9, 10 and vACated alley being more particularly described as follows: $eginning at an iron pia itt the east line of ht'ankliri Strcct and in the west line of Lot Number 10, said iron pin being 104.82 {CCt south o f an iron pin trt the noRhwcst earner of Lot r;umber 11 of said Clind Sells Addition~hd Lot Number 9 extended,ra d stance o F75.23 feet to ~i Number 1U, Lot Number 9 iron pin itl the south line of said F.lind Sells Addition and in the south line of a vacated alloy; thence in an easterly direction and on the south lint of said Elind Sells Addition and the south lisle of said vacated alley a distaa~ce of 104.8 feet to an iron pint; theizce iu a norri~crly cliroctiott and plrallel to tllc west line of Lot Nutxtber 9 extcrtded, I.ot I:untber 9 and Lot riuti~sber 1 U a distance of 813.27 feet to a point; tlZence in a westerly direction and ~~ar~tllel to the no~~lt li„e of Lut Number t 0, a distance of 104.00 feet to the Place of be~inniag. Togetl~cr with ari casemant for the Maintenance of a drain rile Iinc and a septic t~i~k drain across tlic easterly Portions of lots Number 10 anti 9 said Elind Solis Addition still owned by grantor William Sruith said drain tilt and septic tarx drain to run fi•o~r the northeasterly corner of the tract hcreil~above conveyed in a southeasterly direction to R well or cistcrl located in the southeast corner of said i.ot Numbor 9. Coaztt~toniy known z~s: 34-3G Fra~lklin Street p ~C~~Q~9t~ Parcel Numbor: 273-004111 r-`--'~ Prior InstnttZtetlt Reference: O.R. 34182, Pogo 1-01 DEL 3 '~g~ Prior Transfer Dato: 01/30/1997 E CITY OF DUBLIN ~ ~q-~3~ ~ _ _ _ , ~ ~ - d H~_' ~ u~=1'?9~ 1~ ~ 4c ' ~ P .173: ~=~c Exhibit ~ (1'agt 2 of 2) 1'ar~:cl Z [3ring Lot Number Thrcc (3) and the west half of Lot Number Two (2) excepting teu (l4) fret off of the cast side of tl~e said one-half of I.at Number Two (2} sold to W.w. Coffman by t'hariotto Horoh and others, said lots being a pant of the addition of Elrod Sells to tl~e Town of Dublin, Franklin County, Ohio and shown and dcliiieated on the original plat of said Towtti of Dublin, recorded in the Recorders Office, Fraizlclin County, Uhio, and arc the sama premises that Charlotte Horch auci others conveyed to ~ ~9E W. Wing by deed dated December i3, 1910 and recorded sn Vol. 541, Pages 448 , rranklit~ County ,Ohio, RCCOrd oFDeeds and conveyed to said William H. Davis by Gco>!ge W. Wing ~ wife by dead dated September 24, 114. Colnmonty known as: 04000 Wcst Bridga Street 1'arcCl Number: 273-000026 Prior Instrume~~t >Zefcrence: D.B. 569, Page I09 Prior Tr~~slsfer Date: 04/1 t/1920 ~ D ~C - 3 i999 CITY OF DUBLIN ~ ~q~-f31 ~ r OLD DUBLIN TOWN CENTER 2 ~ PROPOSED T E X T West Bridge Street at Franklin Street South of Bridge Street and both sides of Franklin Street DEVELOPMENT TEXT 1 August 1999 l ~ ~A~S~SUBMRTED TO COUNCfL =~~~~-FOR MEETING ON 3 ~ ~ GOAL It is the planning and architectural goal that development within this PUD be consistent with the existing development in Old Dublin. The development standards in Old Dublin are widely different from the new development seen in Dublin, and this text will preserve those standards. SUBAREA 1-EXISTING CHURCH The development at the southwest corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street must be compatible with the surrounding environment, particularly in terms of development standards. The intent of this text is to manage the project/site over the long term. The site is currently owned by the Dublin Community Church. The existing building and site are not affected by this current redevelopment of Subarea 2. This text governs that site for any future changes to the new building or the site. PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES Any future development must be consistent with the current use of the church facilities. The following is a list of the permitted uses: • Religious activities. • Social, educational, and fund raising activities in support of the church's religious mission including entertainment, dining, and classroom functions. • Outdoor seating and playground areas for permitted uses as currently provided. If umbrellas are to be used in the outdoor seating areas, they must be approved by the ARB. No signage is allowed on the umbrellas. All lighting for the outdoor seating areas must be approved by ARB and be consistent with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored outside of the building. Speakers associated with the outdoor seating area(s) are prohibited. The following uses are conditional and must receive approval from the Planning Commission: • Additional outdoor seating or other outdoor usage associated with permitted uses. DEC - 31999 1 FILE COPY ~Q--~3~~ r~~T'° f~~~LIN _ . _ T __..~w ~z SUBAREA 2 - COMI~~RCIAL DEVELOPMENT The development at the southeast corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street must be compatible with the surrounding environment, particularly in terms of development standards. The intent of this text is to manage the project/site over the long term. The site is currently owned by the Dublin Community Church. There is an existing building on the site that will be removed. This text governs that site for any future changes to the new building or the site. PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES Developments must house multiple tenants and multiple uses to the extent possible. The following is a list of the permitted uses: • Business and medical office located on the second floor. • Commercial retail, art gallery, and restaurant. • Outdoor seating area for permitted uses. There will be a maximum of 1,850 square feet of outdoor seating area generally located along both streets plus small amount to the south of the building. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to placing seating in this area. Please note that any seating placed in the right-of--way must receive approval of the City Engineer. If umbrellas are to be used in the outdoor seating areas, they must be approved by the ARB. No signage is allowed on the umbrellas. All lighting for the outdoor seating areas must be approved by ARB and be consistent with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored outside of the building. Speakers associated with the outdoor seating area(s) are prohibited. The following uses are conditional and must receive approval from the Planning Commission: Additional outdoor seating or other outdoor usage associated with permitted uses. • Business and medical office located on the first floor. p [~C~C~Q~I~ r / DES - 3 1999 ~ CITY OF DUBLIN FILE 2 ~a-~~ i DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GOAL Old Dublin has a unique character. It is a blend of buildings, spaces, landscaping, street patterns, and other elements that have grown over time. New buildings in the district should be designed to fit into this strong existing context. The most appropriate designs for new buildings take into account the context, and make an effort to respect it and to fit in visually. New buildings, however, should not artificially assume a historic character they never had. Contemporary design may be appropriate, and creativity is important. Old Dublin has several buildings of recent date that are integrated successfully into the character of the district. Integrating a successful building design into an existing context requires a lot of creativity, and the most successful designs are contemporary in character. However, they take important design cues from what exists around them: Building placement, scale, massing, architecture: • Placement and orientation on the lot: Old Dublin buildings typically are free-standing but closely spaced along the street. Appropriate placement and orientation for a new structure will vary with the location, but the design should resemble the placement and orientation of adjacent structures. • Scale and nro~ortion: Scale refers to the size of a building in relation to that of a person. Old Dublin is distinctive in part because of its unusually intimate scale: nearly every building has a small, pedestrian scale that is inviting to people. Proportion is the relationship between a building facade's width and its height, and it has an impact upon the building's sense of scale abuilding with strongly vertical proportions will impart a different feel than one with a lower profile. Any new construction should be designed with a sense of scale appropriate to that of Old Dublin, with proportions carefully controlled. The most appropriate approach is to study existing buildings in the district and try to achieve similar proportions and sense of scale. This might, for example, require designing a building in a series of smaller masses rather than a single large form. • Height: Buildings in Old Dublin do not exceed two stories in height, and many are only asingle- story. In designing a new building, adjacent building heights should be observed; in no case shall height exceed two stories. • Materials, textures, and colors: New buildings should use traditional Old Dublin materials such as wood, brick and stone. Stucco, or synthetic stucco, used in moderation is also an appropriate veneer material. This will help ensure that new buildings have an appearance and a visual texture compatible with what already exists. Color, too, should be selected according to an historic color palette and should be compatible with the color(s) of the new building's materials. p ~ ~ ~ D d ~ DEC - 3 1999 3 CITY OF DUBLIN • Massing, form, and roof shapes: Massing refers to how the basic shapes of buildings fit together. Most Old Dublin buildings have fairly simple massing, generally plain rectangular shapes used either singly or as intersecting blocks. Some buildings from the later Victorian period have more complex massing consisting of multiple overlapping blocks. Appropriate new building designs should use massing similar to that in adjacent and nearby buildings. Form grows out of massing and refers to the kinds of massing typical of various architectural styles or building ~ types. Federal style buildings, for example, are almost always rectangular in form, while gabled ell structures have an L shape. Form can be affected by later additions. As with massing, new buildings should employ what is typical of Old Dublin. The roof line of a new building should incorporate features seen throughout Old Dublin. Cross gables, intersecting gables, shed roofs, and hip roofs provide variety, and there are some examples of a modified gable known as a hip roof. New building designs should employ roof shapes such as these. • Rh ~thm of openings: In any architectural style or building type, door and window openings have certain patterns. The spacing of these openings in a building wall is known as rhythm. Designs for new buildings should employ rhythms of openings similar to those in adjacent and nearby buildings. • General design: The design of the building must utilize a variety of materials, fmishes and colors, and appear to be storefronts constructed over a number of years. The facade must be "stepped", versus long expanses of flat walls, so as to provide interest. All exterior modification must receive ARB approval. Any future building addition or alterations is subject to the Planning Commission review for fmal development plan approval. Landscaping • Landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Zoning Codes and as generally presented on the enclosed landscape plan. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. Only fencing associated with outdoor seating (decorative fencing), screening of adjacent residential lots, and the screening of mechanical units and dumpsters is permitted, and must receive approval from the ARB. Signage w. • All signs on the site will have a similar character. All signs must comply with the Dublin Sign Code and the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines. Signage may not be internally illuminated or electrically back-lighted. The comprehensive sign package must be approved by the ARB. Once the package is approved, individual tenant signs must comply with that package and receive final. approval from the ARB. p C~~~~dC~ iQ D ~C 3 ~~99 CITY OF DUBLIN 4 ~ ~~.E copy qa~~~i ~ ,r` Parking • Anew parking lot will be constructed within the Old Dublin Town Center 2 Subarea 2 development. This new parking lot will be accessible from Franklin Street and Mill Lane/West Alley and will incorporate a redevelopment of Sells Alley through the parking area. The new parking lot will be made available for the general public associated with Old Dublin use with an understanding that the total parking count is maintained as associated with the parking space requirements of this project. • Any trees that are removed during construction of the new parking area must be replaced by the developer ofthe Old Dublin Town Center 2 in compliance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. • Decorative lighting to match the existing fixtures in the municipal parking lot at the West Bridge Street and South High Street location are to be used in the new parking area. All building- mounted light fixtures must be approved by the ARB. • Buyer agrees to grant Seller a perpetual non-exclusive parking easement, which shall run with the land, to park on the Parking Lotto be developed by Buyer on Parcel 2, as well as a perpetual non exclusive parking easement on that portion of Parcel 1 which will be parking for the office building to be built on Parcel 1. Utilities • All new on-site utilities shall be placed underground; all utility connections shall be to the rear of the building(s); and all heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning equipment shall be effectively screened form view as required by the Zoning Code. Waste All waste materials shall be containerized and effectively screened from view as required by Zoning Code. DEC - 3 1999 CITY OF DUBLIN EILE COY qq-~3~~ 5 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION April 6, 2000 to"f) OF lll'BLI~ Division of Plamung X300 Shier-Rings Road in, Ohio 43016-1236 PI'I~PI~'/iD D: 614-761-6550 Fox: 614-761-6566 Web Site: www.dubiin.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this_meeting: 2. Rezoning Application 99-1312 -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street Location: 3.56 acres located on the southeast and southwest corners of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. Existing .Zoning: PUP, Planned Unit Development District and R-4, Snburbau Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning from PUD, Planned Unit Development District and R-4, Suburban Residential District to PUD. Planned Unit Deve~upment District. Proposed Use: A mixed-use develop~nert of 10,500 squzre feet with restaurant. retail and office uses. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, cio Paul Phillips, ~6 Franklin Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and Patrick Grabi;l, King ; hompson, SSOC Franz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: `To approve this rezoning application because it complies with the Old Dublin Design " Guidelines, increases parking resources within Old Dublin, and promotes gathering places in the area, with 12 conditions: 1) That right-of--way width and placement of the building be subject to the provisions of the text and the approval of the City Engineer; 2) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 3) That revised landscape plans, including buffers, tree preservation and replacement, showing conformance to the Landscape Code be submitted after the applicant has met on site with a certified arborist and City staff and prior to being scheduled on the City Council agenda; 4) That the text be revised to list restaurants, bars, taverns, and pubs as conditional uses; 5) That tree preservation and replacement measures be included in the text; Page l of 2 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION April 6, 2000 2. Rezoning Application 99-1312 -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street (Continued) 6) That the text be revised to state that architecture and signage shall be consistent with those approved for Old Dublin Town Center I, and that details be included; 7) That the text be revised by eliminating stucco and synthetic stucco as permitted building materials; 8) That the text be revised to state that designated parking shall be provided for any residential uses; 9} That the text require all site lighting to meet the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 10) That brick sidewalks be extended south along the east side of Franklin Street; 11) That plans for this proposal be submitted for ARB review and approval following rezoning approval by City Council; and 12) That the revisions to the plans and text required above be submitted within two weeks and be approved by staff prior to the case being scheduled on the City Council agenda. * Patrick Grabrill agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. ~ STAFF CERTIFICATION 0 Jo Talentino Assistant PIanning Director Page 2 of 2 r S Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report - Apri16, 2000 ` Page 6 CASE 2: Rezoning Application 99-1312 -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street Location: 3.56 acres located on the southeast and southwest corners of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District and R-4, Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning from PUD, Planned Unit Development District and R-4, Suburban Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: Anew mixed-use development of 10,500 square feet with restaurant, retail and office uses in addition to the existing church. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c/o Paul Phillips, 8l West Bridge Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and Patrick Grabill, King Thompson, 5500 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. Staff Contact: John Talentino, Assistant Planning Director. BACKGROUND: The Dublin Community Church was rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, in 1996. It received a final development plan approval fora 16,000 square foot addition in 1997. The church parking lot, located on both sides of Franklin Street, has 146 parking spaces. Because that corner parking lot is proposed to be developed as a commercial building, the entire church site is incorporated into this rezoning. No changes are proposed for the church or the parking lot west of Franklin Street. This case was heard informally by the Architectural Review Board (ARB) on August 25, 1999. The ARB generally supported the proposal, and indicated that attention must be given to landscaping the parking lot, screening it from the neighboring residential uses, and providing pedestrian connections between the parking lot and the building. The Planning Commission approved a concept plan for this proposal on September 2, 1999. The Commission requested that the applicant meet with the Franklin Street residents concerning the proposal. City Council approved the concept plan on October 4, 1999. The Commission is to make a recommendation on this rezoning application and forward it to City Council for a public hearing and a final vote. Atwo-thirds vote will be necessary to override a negative recommendation from the Commission. If approved by Council, the rezoning will take effect in 30 days. All development will be subject to final development plan approval by the Commission and architectural approval by the ARB prior to the start of construction. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 ` Page 7 CONSIDERATIONS: Site Characteristics: • The site is 3.56 acres on the southeast and southwest corners of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. The site has about 290 feet of frontage on West Bridge Street, 270 feet of frontage on Franklin Street, and 180 feet on Mill Lane (alley east of the site). The site has a number of large trees. Most of these are located around the existing parking lot. Two are located behind the existing residence. • The overall site includes two corners, one on each side of Franklin Street. The portion on the west side of Franklin Street consists of the Dublin Community Church site, zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and its 125-space parking lot. This area is not expected to change at all as a result of this rezoning. The portion on the east side consists of a 21-space parking lot on Bridge Street, zoned PUD for church parking, plus atwo-family residence to the south, zoned R-4, Suburban Residential District. The residence sits on an "L"-shaped lot that is 200 feet in depth with 105 feet of frontage on Franklin Street. It is proposed for demolition as part of this proposal. • To the north, across West Bridge Street are a daycare center and Indian Run Elementary School, zoned R-2, Limited Suburban Residential District. To the east are retail and office uses zoned CCC, Central Community Commercial District. To the south are atwo-family residence and single-family homes, zoned R-4, Suburban Residential District. To the west is the Dublin Cemetery. Community Plan Issues: • The Old Dublin Area Plan shows the southeast corner of Franklin Street and Bridge Street as a potential site for new development. South of this corner, down Franklin Street, is shown as a potential parking area. However, the plan also notes that parking near residential areas should be screened. The Community Plan states that most of the alleys in Old Dublin are designated for two-way traffic, but they are too narrow for this purpose. Due to right-of--way constraints, the Plan recommends converting the east-west alleys to one-way traffic. • The Old Dublin Area Plan recommends altering the street pattern to ease traffic movement through and within Old Dublin. It shows Franklin Street extending to the north, and curving eastward behind the library to North High Street. This would enable traffic to bypass the Bridge Street and High Street intersection. The plan also recommends creating a SR 161 boulevard through Old Dublin to shrink the perceived barrier between the northern and southern High Street areas, and to extend the roadway design planned for the east side of the bridge. Land Use: • The site includes the Dublin Community Church, its parking, and a duplex on Franklin Street. The proposed development text divides the site into two subareas. Subarea 1 consists of the southwest corner (existing church), and no changes are Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 ` Page 8 raising activities associated with the church, including entertainment, dining, and classrooom functions; and outdoor seating and playground areas for permitted uses. All additional outdoor seating or other outdoor uses are conditional and require approval from the Planning Commission. • Subarea 2 consists of the 0.96-acre development site on the southeast corner. Permitted uses include commercial retail, art gallery and restaurant; outdoor seating for permitted uses as described in the text; business and medical office located on the second floor; and residential located on the second floor. Staff recommends that the text require designated parking to be provided for residential use. Conditional uses include business and medical office and residential located on the first floor; and additional outdoor seating or other outdoor usage. • Anew 10,500 square-foot, two-story building is proposed on the corner to replace the 21-space parking lot. Proposed uses include retail, restaurant, and office uses. The new building is intended to have the appearance of separate buildings that have become attached over time. • This proposal includes the construction of a new 76-space parking lot farther to the south along Franklin Street. The proposal includes the vacation of existing Sells Alley and replacing it with two one-way alleys. • The duplex on Franklin Street will be demolished and replaced with parking. The house is of post-War construction and is not historically significant. ARB approved this demolition if Zoning Code provisions concerning demolition within the historic district are met. The vacation of Sells Alley will require approval from City Council. Neighboring properties to the east currently have access onto the alley, and access for these properties is yet to be resolved. The proposed one-way alleys for the new parking lot are still under review. These two new alleys will serve as parking maneuvering aisles. There have been discussions about the City becoming the owner of the rear 76-space parking lot, like the case with Old Dublin Town Center (I). Site Plan: • The development standards are similar to those approved for the Town Center (I) project. There are no minimum building setbacks from West Bridge Street, Franklin Street or property lines. There are no minimum yard requirements, and no maximum lot coverage. The placement and orientation of the building should resemble those of adjacent structures. Building height should be consistent with adjacent buildings and not exceed two stories. • The proposed building will be located close to the corner with minimal setbacks along both streets. Outdoor seating areas are shown along the public streets at the corner, and immediately to the west and south of the building. The plans show aten-foot wide sidewalk along West Bridge Street, and aneight-foot wide sidewalk along Franklin Street. Brick walls and planting areas will separate the outdoor seating areas from the right-of--way. . The southern portion of the site will be used for parking. Two one-way drive aisles are proposed to connect Franklin Street and Mill Lane/West Alley. The northern Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 ' Page 9 • The southern portion of the site will be used for parking. Two one-way drive aisles are proposed to connect Franklin Street and Mill Lane/West Alley. The northern drive aisle runs west-east and is located 210 feet south of West Bridge Street. The other is 55 feet farther south and runs east-west. An additional 15 spaces will be provided in the southeastern corner of the site with access from West Alley. Sidewalks will be installed along the east and west sides of the building to connect the parking lot. Access• • The current West Bridge Street right-of--way 30 feet from centerline. The Thoroughfare Plan recommends aright-of--way of 112 feet. Dedication of 56 feet from centerline will make it impossible to build the project as proposed. Staff recommends that right-of--way width and placement of the building be subject to the provisions of the text and the approval of the City Engineer. • An engineering feasibility study is currently underway for the northward extension of Franklin Street and a possible median within Bridge Street. The study also examines the feasibility of closing vehicular access to Bridge Street from Franklin Street. A revised draft (enclosed) of the study has been submitted for review. It recommends extending Franklin Street northward and around the library to High Street as a bypass; constructing a Bridge Street median west of High Street; and maintaining full access between Bridge and Franklin Streets. • The existing brick sidewalk along Bridge Street will remain. There currently are no sidewalks on Franklin Street, and that streetscape needs to be improved with features such as brick sidewalks, lighting, benches, bike racks, planting beds, etc. The sidewalk requirement along the west side of Franklin Street was waived by City Council when the church expanded. With this proposal, staff sees an even greater need for sidewalks on both sides of Franklin Street. Parking: • Assuming retail on the first floor (5,200 square feet) and medical office on the second ~ floor (5,300 square feet), required parking for the site would be 62 spaces. Substituting a 3,007 square foot restaurant on the first floor, plus 1,850 square feet of outdoor seating, required parking would require 140 spaces. • The new 75-space parking lot will be accessible from Franklin Street and Mill Lane/West Alley, and will incorporate a redevelopment of Sells Alley within the parking area. The new parking lot will be made available to the church and the general public. The 125 parking spaces behind the church are not yet included in a shared public parking arrangement, and staff recommends that these spaces be part of the overall public parking solution. Architecture: • The proposed two-story building is generally rectangular with multiple projections on all sides. It looks as if the different sections were constructed over time. Varied ,.a..,,..,,.. _ _ L Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 Page 10 heights, materials, fenestration, and massing are used to provide a sense of different structures. There are I 1 exterior doorways and each elevation has multiple entrances. Windows vary across the different building sections with generally large storefront panes on the first floor and smaller windows on the second floor. The roof varies in design from gabled to flat sections. • The proposed building materials and colors will be very similar to those approved for the Old Dublin Town Center. The text should be revised to state this. Building , materials will be predominantly brick and cedar siding. Stucco and synthetic stucco are permitted as a veneer material such as for chimneys in the maruier provided in the Old Dublin Town Center project. However, these materials are not consistent with the provisions of the Old Dublin Design Guidelines. Staff recommends that they be removed from the text, consistent with the ARB condition on the concept plan. The roof material will be a combination of asphalt shingles and standing seam metal. All proposed material colors will be from historic color palettes. Landscaping and Tree Preservation: • The proposed text requires conformance to the Landscape Code. The plans indicate a stone wall with evergreen trees will be installed along the adjacent residential properties. The text does not include details for the proposed buffer along adjacent residential property. The minimum buffer zone required by Code is to be ten feet wide with a continuous six-foot high opaque screen, and one tree per 40 feet of lineal boundary. In a meeting with neighbors, the discussion of buffers centered on a three- foot tall stone wall with evergreen trees planted alternately on both sides to meet the opacity requirements in the Code. Specific buffer standards should be included in the text and/or plan. • There are 31 large trees on the site. This site must comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. A total of 292 caliper inches of protected trees (six inches or larger in caliper) are proposed to be removed, and must be replaced on site. Trees required to meet the provisions of the Landscape Code do not count toward replacement. It appears that some of the trees could be saved under the right circumstances. The applicant should meet with a certified arborist and City staff to discuss these issues. Tree preservation and replacement measures must be included in the text. Signs and Lighting: • The development plan states that all signs for the proposed development will be of a uniform design. The design (size, color, etc) is the same as that approved for the Old Dublin Town Center I project. Each tenant will have the choice of one wall sign or one projecting sign. All signs will be redwood with hand chiseled letters. All signs will have green backgrounds with gold leaf lettering. All of these commitments should be articulated in the text for clear administration over time as the tenancy or ownership changes. • Utilizing the same historic style light fixtures in use at the municipal parking lot on South High Street is proposed. The proposed text requires all light fixtures to match ~.~;.R.~.~.,..........~.. _ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 Page 11 those used for Old Dublin Town Center I, and all building-mounted fixtures are to be approved by the ARB. The text should state that all lighting must comply with the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. Utilities: • Stormwater management is a critical issue in Old Dublin. This site must comply with the Stormwater Regulations. The plan indicates that stormwater will be detained on the parking lot surface, and then filtered by an underground treatment system ("stormceptor"). The proposed stormwater management plan is similar to that approved for the Old Dublin Town Center project at Bridge and High Streets, and will meet the requirements of the City Engineer. • Water is available to the site from a 16-inch line located along the north side of West Bridge Street and/or aneight-inch line extending south from West Bridge Street along the west side of Franklin Street. Open cuts of the existing roadways require prior written approval from the City Engineer. • Sanitary sewer is available to the site from an eight-inch line located in Sells Alley. A utility easement will need to be established to maintain this line if the alley is vacated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposal is consistent with Community Plan goals and the Old Dublin Area Plan. The proposed development standards are consistent with those approved for the Old Dublin Town Center I project. Staff recommends approval with 12 conditions: Conditions: 1) That right-of--way width and placement of the building be subject to the provisions of the text and the approval of the City Engineer; 2) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 3} That revised landscape plans, including buffers, tree preservation and replacement, showing conformance to the Landscape Code be submitted after the applicant has met on site with a certified arborist and City staff and prior to being scheduled on the City Council agenda; 4) That text be revised to include at least part of the 125 church parking spaces in the overall parking solution, subject to staff approval; 5) That tree preservation and replacement measures be included in the text; 6) That the text be revised to state that architecture and signage shall be consistent with those approved for Old Dublin Town Center I, and that details be included; 7) That the text be revised by eliminating stucco and synthetic stucco as permitted building materials, and eliminating outdoor seating as a permitted use for the existing church (Subarea 1); 8) That the text be revised to state that designated parking shall be provided for residential use; r . Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -April 6, 2000 Page l2 9) That the text be require all site lighting to meet the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 10) That brick sidewalks be extended south along both sides of Franklin Street; 11) That plans for this proposal be submitted for ARB review and approval following rezoning approval by City Council; and 12) That the revisions to the plans and text required above be submitted within two weeks and be approved by staff prior to the case being scheduled on the City Council agenda. Bases: 1) The proposal complies with the Old Dublin Design Guidelines. 2) The proposal furthers the goals of the Community Plan by increasing parking resources within Old Dublin. 3) It promotes gathering places in the area by providing retail and restaurant uses. .w Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 ` Page 8 13) That revised plan stdsmitted within two weeks and prior to scheduling t - s eeting, subject to staff approval. Mr. Olmstead agreed to the above s. Mr. Sprague seconded the motion, and the vo was as follows: an, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes• ow, yes; y, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; and Mr. Eastep, yes. - 2. Rezoning Application 99-1312 -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street John Talentino presented this rezoning request for a site that includes the Dublin Community Church PUD. The eastern church 21-space parking lot is proposed for development. The area to the south of it will be used for about 70 new spaces. The existing church and its western parking lot are not to be changed. He said the Architectural Review Board supported this application. The ARB was concerned about screening the parking lot, buffering along the neighboring residences, and providing good pedestrian access and circulation through this site. Mr. Talentino showed several slides. The proposal includes vacating a portion of an alley to the east of Franklin Street, replacing it with another circulation area. He noted Franklin Street has no sidewalks. An existing duplex will be razed. He said staff recommends preserving some significant trees on the site. One of the two large trees behind the residence can be saved. One way circulation is proposed through the parking lot. The proposed building is very close to Bridge and Franklin Streets. He said there is a staff alternative pazking lot layout included in the Commission packet. He said there are five curbcuts in the proposed design. A staff alternative reduced this to two and increases interior landscaping. The final development plan will determine the parking lot layout. He said the Community Plan encourages buildings along the street with screened parking to the rear. He noted the staff alternative yields fewer spaces. He said this building repeats the general design of the Town Center I. The scale and character follow the Old Dublin Design Guidelines. It has. multiple entrances and storefronts on each elevation and uses a variety of materials. It employs plain changes and gives the impression of ~ several buildings developed over time. The 10,500 square foot building, depending on the tenant mix, meets the parking Code. If there is a restaurant, the parking requirement raises. Staff suggests using some of the church pazking to meet that additional Code requirement due to its proximity. This is not included in the application. Mr. Talentino said the Old Dublin traffic study addresses a possible bypass road in the northwest quadrant of the Bridge/high intersection and a possible median along Bridge Street. Creating a cul-de-sac on Franklin Street was not recommended; it forces the neighborhood traffic through the Bridge/High intersection, and causes it to fail. There has been discussion about making it appear not to be a through street. Restrictive pavement width with pazking there, or heavy landscaping, or signs could be used. Mr. Talentino said buffer standards were also discussed at the neighborhood meeting. He said the applicant, staff, and neighbors all agreed to work together on a buffer. The idea was a three- ..,w.~ :m L. _ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page 9 foot stone wall with evergreen plantings on either side as a buffer. He said staff wants to meet later to solidify those commitments in the text prior to scheduling it for Council. The text needs to reference signage, lighting, stormwater management and architecture, similar to Old Dublin Town Center I. He said tree replacement is an issue that also needs to be resolved. Mr. Talentino said staff feels this application is consistent with the Community Plan goals and the Old Dublin Area Plan. The development standards are consistent with Old Dublin, and staff recommends approval of this application, with 12 conditions: 1) That right-of--way width and placement of the building be subject to the provisions of the text and the approval of the City Engineer; 2) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 3) That revised landscape plans, including buffers, tree preservation and replacement, showing conformance to the Landscape Code be submitted after the applicant has met on site with a certified azborist and City staff and prior to being scheduled on the City Council agenda; 4) That text be revised to include at least part of the 125 church pazking spaces in the overall parking solution, subject to staff approval; 5) That tree preservation and replacement measures be included in the text; 6} That the text be revised to state that architecture and signage shall be consistent with those approved for OId Dublin Town Center I, and that details be included; 7) That the text be revised to eliminate stucco and synthetic stucco as permitted building materials, and to eliminate outdoor seating as a permitted use for the existing church (Subarea 1); 8) That the text be revised to state that designated parking shall be provided for residential use; 9) That the text be require all site lighting to meet the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 10) That brick sidewalks be extended south along both sides of Franklin Street; 11)That plans for this proposal be submitted for ARB review and approval following rezoning approval by City Council; and 12) That the revisions to the plans and text required above be submitted within two weeks and be ~ approved by staff prior to the case being scheduled on the City Council agenda. M~ Mr. Eastep was sympathetic to some of the issues raised by residents. Franklin Street residents should not suffer because of commercial expansion nearby. The neighbors have characterized it as over-development of the area, and they do not want commercial traffic on their residential street. He understood the reason for not creating a cul de sac at Franklin Street. There is no right-of--way to improve the Bridge/High intersection because of the building setback. Franklin Street should not be used to re-route the traffic. He raised this as a problem with Phase I and Phase II of this proposal. He said Dublin wants development and wants to revitalize Old Dublin, but he asked why should the residents suffer the consequences. Ms. Salay agreed. Mr. Talentino did not agree that there was suffering. He said the traffic study did not conclude where the cul-de-sac should be located. He said when traffic is completely cut-off, the larger intersection fails. He said traffic should be allowed to come off Bridge Street, into the church. There needs to be more than one way out. He said the pavement on Franklin Street is very wide, and could be narrowed. , .~...r,...: _ _ _ _,~....~...,.~,.w.,.~.....~...... Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page 10 Mr. Eastep said that would not be pro-active engineering. He asked if the majority of the residents agreed with the plan. Mr. Talentino said the residents' main concerns were parking, traffic and screening, but there was not a lot of negative reaction to this plan. Mr. Eastep wanted the church, as part of this PUD application, to screen the 125-space parking lot. He said the church parking lot screening must come into compliance for him to support this. Mr. Talentino said no changes to that site are proposed. Ms. Clarke said technically, the church is an applicant because its PUD plan is being altered. Its eastern parking lot is proposed for development, and this substantially alters the approved plan. No changes to the western side of Franklin Street are proposed, but both sides of the street are included in the PUD, regardless of who owns them today. Ms. Salay wanted to encourage a pedestrian connection such as a brick path between the Dublin Town Center I and II. Parking needs to be identified and utilized, and parking is a concern. She asked if the church had agreed to its 125 parking spaces being used for this project because it has weddings and other events in addition to Sunday services. She noted there is a preschool located at the church. Mr. Talentino said the goal of an overall parking solution was discussed with the church, and the church is willing to be a part of the solution. They have concerns about daycare parking and special events. A parking agreement has not yet been reached. Mr. Sprague said he serves on the Old Dublin Revitalization Task Force. He announced the public meeting on April 12 to discuss its recommendations. He asked if the proposal to visually separate Franklin Street from the commercial area is consistent with the task force's initial recommendations. Mr. Talentino said there was not an actual proposal, but the northern Franklin Street extension is a bypass of the intersection, it is not to get people to south Franklin Street. Movements through the neighborhood could easily be restricted, if necessary. Mr. Sprague understood there was a net parking gain. Pazking has both a residential and commercial component. There needs to be a comprehensive view on parking. He asked if all the church parking spaces could be obtained in a parking agreement. Ms. Clarke said the church is the major property owner of the PUD being altered, and under Code, it is the applicant. She said no church could loan all of its parking all of the time without considering its own needs. Mr. Sprague said the church lot is rarely full. Mr. Talentino said a portion of the church parking might be shared at certain hours. Mr. Sprague said the overall plan will aesthetically improve the overall area around the church. It will enhance the area. Mr. Fishman favored this project but was disappointed the parking issue was unresolved. The church is not present, and without a solid agreement with the church, he visualized a future sign saying "Church Parking Only." Without a church representative, there is no agreement. I _ WMafla.. _...........~,.®.~u.mmss.~« w...wcr~-"--+_ ~ xac«_-,...~c.r.amwnrrrt..w.ws.w+urr~rw~~..~er+_ nr+t+tti~ . ' Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Pagel 1 Patrick Grabill, applicant, said he understood the application was filed using the name of the Dublin Community Church. However, because of the delays and to help the church, he has bought the eastern property. He considered the church to be no longer involved because the land is already in Mr. Grabill's name. Mr. Eastep noted the church was a co-applicant by Code. Mr. Grabill hopes a municipal or quasi-municipal parking authority will be created. As this site develops, they will install the pazking lots first, so the church does not lose 21 spaces during construction. He hopes the Old Dublin Task Force recommends that the City adopt ownership of the Old Dublin parking issue. The authority can then work with the church on parking. He would like Por Dublin to work with the church on a maintenance and cross easement agreement, but that cannot be done out of sequence. The church needs to be involved in the decision process, and he thought the current progression was logical. A plan should be provided to the church that makes sense for it. He said he would not commit the church to do whatever the Commission wanted. He again said the church is not an applicant for Town Center II. Mr. Eastep said on paper and off cially, the church was a co-applicant. He noted no one from the church was present. He said by altering the PUD for the church, the other 125 church parking spaces become involved. Mr. Grabill responded that the 125 church parking spaces are not part of his application. His application did not bind the church on its existing parking lot. He said the Commission needs to make its decision on Town Center II as presented. He said the City of Dublin has failed to prepare an effective coordinated parking plan. Mr. Grabill said his application is balanced on parking. The additional 125 parking spaces that the City has might be involved if a restaurant use is proposed. He said everything else in Old Dublin has parking variances, but this proposal includes more parking than any other application in the district. He did not want this hung up on a parking technicality. He was told last November, that Dublin would rewrite its zoning code for the historic district. Mr. Fishman suggested that a restaurant be treated as a conditional use, to deal with parking later. Mr. Grabill said that puts the cart was before the horse. He said the Task Force has to create an overall parking authority for Old Dublin. If every little property has to comply with , parking, Old Dublin can never be developed. He can not accept a condition that said he must come back to use the church's parking lot for a restaurant use. He said the City had to take ownership of the parking issue. Mr. Fishman understood Mr. Grabill's point. However, if a restaurant is added, there will be no place to park regardless of what the City does or does not do. Therefore, the residents behind this development will have cars parked on their lawns, driveways, etc. He said the solution was to make an parking agreement with the church. Mr. Grabill said the City, not a property owner, needed to do that. The parking solutions have to be designed as an overall development. He promised to do everything possible to work with the church to add to the parking. He said the City needs to do more. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page 12 Mr. Lecklider asked how the parking requirements were addressed in Dublin Town Center I. Mr. Grabill said variances were granted with no usage restrictions of any kind. Mr. Talentino said the project probably meets the Parking Code as presented, except if a restaurant is included. He noted that a restaurant was a permitted use, per the text. Ms. Salay said restaurant customers would not return if there were parking problems. Ms. Salay was very concerned about the Franklin Street residents. If the parking problem becomes theirs, they will be unhappy. She liked this project and it was great looking. Mr. Grabill said from a business standpoint, a restaurant was not being encouraged. He wanted to remain flexible. Mr. Eastep said the church is part of this application. Mr. Grabill agreed, technically. He stated that City Council did not do as the Commission recommended before, and that the church was very angry at the City for some of the things it had been asked to do_ He thought the Task Force will provide a positive, cooperative solution soon, but this application should be separate. Mr. Eastep said some of his issues from the September 2, 1999 Commission meeting have not been addressed. He appreciates that the applicant is bringing business into Old Dublin, but it is really not Dublin's responsibility to provide parking for his business. He sees this as largely a private sector responsibility, part of doing business. Mr. Grabill said things are different in a historic district. He said Dublin granted variances for the removal of gas stations from the corner. He said that was a positive solution. He said the typical parking lot restrictions cannot reasonably be imposed in downtown Dublin. Mr. Grabill thought the Historic District regulations, drafted by Counciimember Tom McCash, would be in place by now, and those regulations were to waive pazking requirements. He said he had been cooperative and supportive of Dublin's efforts in Old Dublin. Without the cooperation of the Commission and others, redevelopment will never happen. He cannot do this alone, and the typical standards make no sense in Old Dublin. Mr. Eastep agreed. However, he believed the church really is central to the issue, and that Dublin should not have the sole responsibility to find parking to solve the problem. Mr. Grabill said ten yeazs ago he did Cobblestone Square on South High Street. It added 18 pazking spaces, vacated the alley for Dublin, redeveloped that, and gave it back to the City. That is all public parking. He said there is only a finite amount of land. He said he would accept a negative vote from the Commission, but he does not believe the church is still involved. Mr. Eastep said the approved parking for the church is not being rezoned, and the church is therefore involved. If they did not want to be involved, they should have kept their parking lot. He thought a church representative should have been present. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission , Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page 13 Mr. Grabill said the staff asked him to add the church because it was part of the original PUD. Mr. Grabill said the church will react when they see Dublin's comprehensive parking plan and redevelopment package. He said there is a sequence problem, and the church could not wait any longer. They are nearly done with Town Center I, and they need to move on to this project. Mr. Eastep said he greatly appreciates the upgrading and revitalization of Old Dublin that Mr. Grabill is doing. His concern is that more is being developed that the parking reserves can support. He does not oppose this application, but he is concerned about parking to make it work. Mr. Grabill'said there is total agreement that there was not enough parking. He said the parking solution should be comprehensive. He said there will be a Starbucks Coffee at Old Dublin Town Center I. He said he could not afford to put residential use on the second floor of either project. Mr. Lecklider said he understood Mr. Grabill's frustration with the sequencing. He did note that the responsibility should not be borne by this Commission. The Commission wants to cooperate with everyone. Mr. Grabill said they tried hard to conform with the Community Plan and the development standards. The Commission needs to act or opportunities will be missed. Mr. Lecklider did not want to miss opportunities, but he wanted something stronger than faith to vote on. He understood Mr. Eastep's point, that we to rely on the church for parking. Mr. Grabill said he would submit a conditional use for a restaurant use, but he could not tie it to the church. He said he could not accept Condition 4. Mr. Eastep asked if restaurant uses were conditional in Town Center I. Mr. Grabill said it was zoned a Central Community Commercial District. He said they agreed to bring it back in as a zoning so that the historical records would be accurate. Mr. Fishman said if there is a restaurant use, Mr. Grabill will have to come back to the Commission for approval. Mr. Banchefsky said that could be a commitment which was part of this application, but it would not take the church out of the picture. Mr. Fishman said the church was not the whole issue. If a parking garage is going to be built nearby, this will solve the problem and the restaurant will be approved. Mr. Lecklider hoped this solution will be known within a couple of months. Mr. Talentino said a restaurant needs one space for every 50 square feet of building, which is about three times as many as required now. Mr. Grabill did not think there would be much demand for a restaurant, but he could not make any kind of commitment for the church. Mr. Talentino said the applicant will build a sidewalk in on the east side of Franklin Street. But the west side belongs to the church, and that is not being constructed. Staff and the Architectural Review Board recommend installing sidewalks on both sides because of the pedestrian traffic expected here_ Sidewalks should also be considered in the overall parking solution. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission , Minutes - Apri16, 2000 Page 14 Ms. Salay said the sidewalk would be necessary if, and only if, the church was part of the comprehensive parking solution. Mr. Lecklider said if this application is approved, there is no leverage to encourage the church to install a sidewalk. There is no one from the church to accept a condition either. Mr. Sprague asked if the City could install a sidewalk on the west side in the easement. Mr. Grabill said a parking authority could approach the church, perhaps leasing the lot for one dollar and maintaining it. As an additional consideration, it could provide a brick cross pavement. He did not think a sidewalk on the west side of Franklin Street was important, but the church will be using the new lot, and a crossing point would be good. Mr. Lecklider said the traffic would increase in this area as a result of this project, and he was concerned people would walk on the street. Mr. Talentino said outdoor seating was a permitted use in the text; he said the nearest residence was about 200 feet away. The outdoor dining area is very small, holding only a table or two, and no outdoor speakers. He was not concerned about creating a situation with the neighbors as is experienced with Mary Kelley's. Mr. Lecklider suggested revising the outdoor seating condition to include restaurants, bars, and taverns, as conditional uses. Mr. Lecklider asked if the median was still an option on Bridge Street from High Street west to Franklin Street. Mr. Talentino said yes. Mr. Sprague said the study said it was feasible, but the Old Dublin Task Force recommendation does not include it. Mr. Grabill said he hopes to create a streetscape for Dublin. There is an area where people congregate during parades. He hoped the public patio at the corner of Franklin Street and Bridge Street. He wanted to encourage seating there, but not table or restaurant seating. Mr. Grabill said they will repeat the text for Dublin Town Center I and use the same sign standards and materials. He said a visual barrier is needed along the alley behind Franklin Street, such as a dry laid stone wall. Several residents have rear-loading driveways. He will work with staff and Ms. Cassidy, the adjacent property owner, to accomplish the same kind of look. Mr. Lecklider asked if the asphalt shingles proposed would be consistent with Dublin Town Center I. Mr. Grabill said yes. He noted the building has a large section of flat roof. Brian Horne said the shingles will be one of the same types used on Dublin Center I. They are an asphalt shingles that has dimensions that are cut to look like slate shingles. Mr. Grabill agreed to the conditions below, but he could not make commitments for the church. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page I S Ms. Boring was very concerned that the church was not present to acknowledge the conditions and text for the PUD of which they are a part. Mr. Sprague said the church was notified and waived its opportunity to be present and heard. Mr. LeckIider'noted that no changes were being made to the text as it related to the church. Mr. Eastep noted the time was 11:10 p.m. After discussion the Commission decided not to ,~.r, waive the 11 o'clock rule. The fifth case would be postponed due to the hour. Mr. Banchefsky recommended that staff contact the church to let them know what transpired at this meeting. They can voice any concerns to City Council. Ms. Boring was against the west side sidewalk on Franklin Street because it went nowhere. Mr. Fishman said his only problem was solving the parking problem. He said if the restaurant is a conditional use, the parking problem is solved. It can be dealt with later. Ms. Boring asked why staff recommended elimination of outdoor seating as a permitted use for the church. Mr. Talentino said there is no interest in limiting anything that the church now does. "outdoor seating" is seen as a commercial use, and it seems inappropriate at the church site. Ms. Boring said the second half of Condition 7 needed to be eliminated because Mr. Grabill would not accept any condition on behalf of the church. Ms. Boring said she was most concerned about the parking being handled. She did not want to impose anything on the church. She said Condition 10 should be amended to say that brick sidewalks should be extended on the east side only. Rob Montgomery, 32 West Bridge Street, the Animal Hospital, asked why the church was on the application if it was not needed. He is a member of the church and did not know why they were not represented. Mr. Eastep explained this was because the church's PUD is being revised. He noted the zoning runs with the Iand. Mr. Eastep asked if the church site currently met the current Landscape Code. Ms. Newcomb said if should due to its recent expansion. She agreed to have it field checked for compliance. Ms. Boring said the minutes reflected that the Commission recommended to Council that the church receive the sidewalk waiver at that time. Ms. Salay made a motion to approve this application because it complies with the Old Dublin Design Guidelines, increases parking resources within Old Dublin, and promotes gathering places in the area, with 12 conditions: 1) That right-of--way width and placement of the building be subject to the provisions of the text and the approval of the City Engineer; 2) That a vacation plat for Sells Ailey be approved by City Council; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -April 6, 2000 Page 16 3) That revised landscape plans, including buffers, tree preservation and replacement, showing conformance to the Landscape Code be submitted after the applicant has met on site with a certified arborist and City staff and prior to being scheduled on the City Council agenda; 4) That the text be revised to list restaurants, bars, taverns, and pubs as conditional uses; 5) That tree preservation and replacement measures be included in the text; 6) That the text be revised to state that architecture and signage shall be consistent with those approved for Old Dublin Town Center I, and that details be included; 7) That the text be revised by eliminating stucco and synthetic stucco as permitted building materials; 8) That the text be revised to state that designated parking shall be provided for any residential uses; 9) That the text require all site lighting to meet the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 10) That brick sidewalks be extended south along the east side of Franklin Street; 11) That plans for this proposal be submitted for ARB review and approval following rezoning approval by City Council; and 12) That the revisions to the plans and text required above be submitted within two weeks and be approved by staff prior to the case being scheduled on the City Council agenda. Mr. Grabill agreed to the above conditions. Mr. Eastep seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Ms. Salay, yes. (Approved 7-0.) 3. Revised Final Development Plan 00-022FDP - offman Park - 5600 Post Road Carson Combs presented this revised fin evelopment plan for 56 acres located o e northwest corner of Post Road and erald Parkway. The proposal will allevi current - erosion problems for the existi pond, and provide for aesthetic enhanceme The general area is the pavilion/ice ri nd the pond. He showed several slides. Mr. Combs a pedestrian walkway around the retenti and and formal planting areas around pavilion were included in the Coffman P aster Plan. The pond's riprap has ided for some erosion problems. Th ity wants to alleviate these through th combination of a retention wall with a s' alk and a seating wall around the eastern a of the pond. Low accent lighting is proposal around the large oval lawn. The res will be on dark green poles that c others already in the park. They are 1 att fixtures and about 20 feet high. Ms. Bori s ed if this is the area used as .secondary ing for the Irish Festival. Ms. Cla said yes, but event parking is a temp use. The space has always been ogrammed as an exhibition ground in the C an Park Master Plan. DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION OCTOBER 3, 1996 •r~ ~?r i?i~itt.in ssoa si,~ ~ Rana ~+iin, OH 13011-1236 F D0: bl1/Ibl-b550 Fax: b14/Ib1-6506 , The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 5. Rezoning Application 295-009 -Preliminary Development Plan -Dublin Community Church - 81 West Bridge Street Location: 2.626 acres located on the southwest and southeast corners of Bridge Street and Franklin Street. Existing Zoning: CCC, Central Community Commercial District and R-4, Suburban Residential District. Request: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: A proposed 16,000 square foot expansion of the existing church to include a 5,958 square foot sanctuary expansion and parking for 146 vehicles. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c/o Paul W. Phillips, 2885 West Dublin-Granville Road, Columbus, Ohio 43235; and Jeffrey S. Kent, Mt. Air Construction and Development, 1360 Briarcliffe Drive, Powell, Ohio 43065. MOTION: To approve this application with 12 conditions: 1) That Sells Alley be vacated on the site subject to City Council approval and that a vacation plat be submitted, prior to review of the final development plan; 2) That following alley vacation, all lots on the west side of Franklin Street be combined; w~:.~ 3) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staff approval; 4) That the Architecturak Review Board and the applicant review and make a recommendation regazding the existing ground sign; 5) That the landscape plan conform to Code, include a property perimeter buffer along the south property line, and show screening of all parking lots including the lot east of Franklin Street, subject to staff approval; 6) That a brick sample panel be submitted for staff review to assure coordination with the blended brick on the historic structure; 7) That stormwater management meet the approval of the City Engineer; 8) That right-of--way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated to the City by means of a general warranty deed; 9) That all conditions imposed by the Architectural Review Board be met; Page 1 of 2 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center Il DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMIVIISSION RECORD OF ACTION OCTOBER 3, 1996 5, .Rezoning Application Z95-049 - PreluninarY Development Plan -Dublin Community Church - 81 West Bridge Street (Continued) lp) That parking spaces along Franklin Street be 19 feet in length and include wheel stops as far as practicable; 11) That a sidewalk be constructed along Franklin Street, except as waived by Council; and 12) That a site dimension plan be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. *Jeffrey S. Dent agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: The Commission recommends approval of this rezoning application. It will be forwarded to City Council for scheduling of a public hearing with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Mary .Newcomb Graduate Landscape Architect Page 2 of 2 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 ' Page 5 Ms. Clarke said the maximum ground sign hei t is 15 feet under the Code, including moulding. She said the vertical BMW shape is not the my possibility for fu re signs. Most signs were submitted with the building development p and coordinated b the developer. Mr. Sutphen wanted to limit the height t 13 feet. Mr. Rauh Mr. Peplow agreed. Mr. Ferrara said alollipop-shaped s' n would not be consi nt and would not be appr ed. Ms. Boring said many residents ant sign limits. Th t. Auburn study reinfor the high quality image of the corporate ens. She requested a mpromise from the appl" t. ~a Mr. Sutphen made a moll to approve this appli tioa with the following tw conditions: 1) That the sign be ' 'led to l~ feet in hei ,including any moundin n which it will sit, in conforman 'th Code; and 2) That the sign placed in confo with engineering require nts regarding easements and the cl sight triangle at the ' ersection. Mr. Harlan s nded the motion. .Putman said he prefe ed a taller sign. There was agreement t some regrading of the ound could be done to k pit within 13 feet. Ms. Clazke said the p g lot could be scree ed by evergreens or some terial other than mounding. The vote was as follows: Mr. eplow, yes; Mr. Harlan, es; Mr. Rauh, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; Ms. ci-Zuercher, yes; and Mr. Sutphen, yes. (Approved 7-0.) 5. Rezoning Application Z95-009 -Preliminary Development Plan -Dublin Community Church - 81 West Bridge Street Mary Newcomb presented this preliminary development plan for rezoning 2.626 acres on the southwest and southeast corners of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. The request is to -change the zoning from CCC, Central Community Commercial, and R-4, Suburban Residential Districts, to PUD, Planned Unit Development District. The site is in the Architectural Review area, requiring Architectural Revie~~v Boazd (ARB) approval of demolition and all exterior modifications. A 16,000 squaze foot church. addition at the rear including a 5,000 square foot sanctuary and a pazking lot for 146 vehicles are proposed. A fellowship hall and kitchen will be below the sanctuary. No concept plan was deemed necessary because this has been a church since 1878 and will continue to be one. The proposal was reviewed informally by ARB on September 25, 1996, and a positive recommendation with conditions was made. The formal request will be heard by ARB on October 23. The church sanctuary was constructed in 1877. The classroom addition is used as a daycare facility during the week. A small pazking lot is located behind the church, and it will be expanded after demolition of a house at the south end of the site. The southeast corner of Bridge Street is a 21-space church pazking lot. Neighboring properties include an elementary school, daycare center, Dublin Cemetery, several stores, and residences on Franklin Street. Both the original 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center 11 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 Page 6 sanctuary and the addition are brick. The sign has changeable copy, and such signs aze not permitted under the current code. Staff recommends bringing signage into Code conformance. The current parking lot has no curb cuts on Franklin Street and no real separation between the parking lot and street. The parking lot will be reconstructed to provide a landscaped area around it. Efforts will be taken to preserve large trees during construction. Brick details, brick pilasters, shutters, and Gothic-style. windows will be repeated on the expansion. Staff encourages augmenting the existing buffers with more plant material. Parking is based upon the size of the sanctuary, requiring 199 spaces. The existing and expanded lots will provide 146 spaces. " There is an existing alley which currently provides one-way traffic to the north. The applicant proposes to change it to one-way, south. Staff recommends that it remain the same or possibly be considered as right-out only. The City Engineer will review that issue separately. The alley provides access to the Dublin Cemetery and is used for maintenance. Ms. Newcomb said the Thoroughfare Plan shows 112 feet for Bridge Street right~f--way. Staff recommends dedicating right-of--way consistent with it. The Franklin Street right-of--way jogs from 60 to 50 feet. The minimum pazking setback is 18 feet, and the plan shows 10 to 18 feet. The standard parking space length is 19 feet, and 17 foot spaces are shown overhanging landscaped areas. Staff supports that design except where it would encroach on the Franklin Street setback. There will bean 18-foot buffer between the house to the south and the parking lot. Landscaping will be finalized at the final development plan stage. Street trees and sidewalks will be required along Franklin Street will be required (unless waived by Council). Brick to match the original sanctuary is proposed with a matching dark brown standing seam metal roof. Details of the original church on the e~ansion will be incorporated. The roof height to the peak of the existing sanctuary is 44 feet and. the addition will match that. One alley is located between the site and the cemetery. It is unclear whether Davis Alley was properly vacated. Staff is requesting that a formal vacation request and vacation plat be prepazed. Ms. Newcomb said there currently is no parking lot lighting and staff strongly encouraged using "Old Dublin" light fixtures which meet the cutoff requirements of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. Staff recommends that the trash dumpster be relocated away from the residential azea and a dumpster enclosure should be architecturally integrated with the building. Stormwater management will have to meet the requirements of the City Engineer and the existing storm sewers which will receive runoff from the site, must be verified for adequate capacity. 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 ' Page 7 Ms. Newcomb said the purpose of the PUD regulations is to permit flexibility with the zoning requirements. The applicant is requesting flexibility in terms of the required number, length, and pazking setback of the parking spaces that what would be required. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning application with the following 12 conditions: I) That Sells Alley be vacated on the site subject to City Council approval and that a vacation plat be submitted, prior to review of the final development plan; 2) That following alley vacation, all lots on the west side of Franklin Street be combined; 3) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staff approval; 4) That the existing ground sign be replaced with a sign that conforms to Code; 5) That the landscape plan conform to Code, include a property perimeter buffer along the south property line, and show screening of all parking lots including the lot east of Franklin Street, subject to staff approval; 6) That a brick sample panel be submitted for staff review to assure coordination with the blended brick on the historic structure; 7) That stormwater management meet the approval of the City Engineer; 8) That right-of--way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated to the City by means of a general warranty deed; 9) That all conditions imposed by the Architectural Review Boazd be met; 10) That pazking spaces along Franklin Street be 19 feet in length and include wheel stops; 11) That a sidewalk be constructed along Franklin Street, except as waived by Council; and 12) That a site dimension plan be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. Ms. Newcomb said a resident at 80 Franklin Street was concerned with drainage, the southern entrance, buffering, and demolition. The resident would like to see the southern driveway entrance extended north or perhaps closed to prevent additional traffic through the residential neighborhood. Staff recommends buffering between Franklin Street and the church parking lot. ' Mr. Harian asked why staff recommended that the west side alley go north instead of south as requested by the applicant. Ms. Newcomb said staff was concerned -with left-turns at this site. She said that restricted left-turn movements during certain portions of the day may be evaluated. Mr. Ferrara asked if there were any sidewalks on Franklin Street. Ms. Newcomb said no. Ms. Newcomb said the Architectural Review ordinance was revised several years ago and it incorporated atwo-step application for large projects. This is the first two-stage application submitted. This is the fast planned district to be proposed within the historic district, and both the ARB and Commission will need to approve all proposed modifications. Mr. Sutphen asked if a drainage problem existed. Balbir Kinds said none were known. Mr. Rauh said it was encouraging to see Dublin's churches expanding. He asked where two additional feet could be found to increase the parking stalls along Franklin Street to 19 feet. Ms. 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 ` Page 8 Newcomb said there was a large interior greenspace. Mr. Rauh questioned if this would work. Mr. Peplow asked if staff supports joint parking areas to meet the parking requirement. Ms. Newcomb said churches are permitted joint parking located within 300 feet of he entrance for up to 50 percent of their parking. She said instead of two services, the sanctuary expansion will permit the church to hold only one service. Ms. Clarke said the expansion brings the site closer to the current Code parking ratio. She said there had been no complaints regarding parking. Ms. Newcomb asked to add "where feasible" to Condition 10. Ms. Clarke said staff wants to meet the Code minimum landscaping, especially along a residential street. Mr. Rauh advised reducing the driving lanes by a foot or two. He said adjusting a tight parking lot such as this would cause circulation problems. Ms. Clarke agreed to look at this and the use of compact spaces in some areas. Jeff Kent, Mt. Air Construction and Development, said two exits on Franklin Street are needed. Mr. Kent said the church was very concerned about their changeable copy ground sign. He agreed to all other conditions as presented above. He said the 19-foot parking spaces along Franklin Street might be problematic. Mr. Kent said they were architecturally trying to replicate the existing sanctuary in all the uterior and exterior details. All the exterior brick details, the cobbles and the pilasters, will be reproduced in the new structure. They will work with staff to get a brick to match closely. Mr. Rauh said the changeable copy ground sign was in the historic area and perhaps by using different lettering, etc., it could be improved without removing it. Mr. Rauh asked if the kitchen exhaust would be placed in a structure housing in the elevator tower. Mr. Kent said the details remain to be worked out with the kitchen company. He said it will not be visible from the street. The top of the elevator shaft is at the eave line of the building addition. Mr. Ferrara said one of the striking features. of the existing church was the detailed brickwork. He asked if the addition would have the ~xaci same brickwork. Mr. Kent said yes. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said the church signs are always sensitive, but she was uncomfortable making an exception for a church. New churches have been required to comply with the sign code. Adam Rienhart said there was a substantial grade from the street up to the cemetery to an area the acted as a collecting basin for all the water from the area and it was swampy. Screening for the residence should also be addressed. Mr. Rienhart thought the PUD had too much flexibility. He preferred to see a strict variance granted which incorporates all 12 conditions. He wanted the drainage to be properly addressed 99-131 Z Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 Page 9 and was concerned about neighboring property values. Ms. Newcomb said this PUD would be specifically for the church and parking lot shown. No other use will be permitted, however. 'Ihe planned district does provide flexibility in development standards. Mr. Rienhart said without reviewing the PUD thoroughly, he could not recommend it. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher said the public hearing at City Council should not be underestimated and recommended that Mr. Rienhart prepare himself appropriately for that hearing. Rick Harkless, ME Civil Engineering, said the existing parking lot drainage was currently over land and therd were no storm structures in the parking lot. With the improvements, they will pit . in storm sewers and use drainage underground for proper discharge. Mr: Sutphen asked if that would solve the drainage problem near the existing residence. Mr. Harkless said there should be no standing water. Mr. Ferrara asked where the storm sewer drained. Mr. Harkless said there was a storm inlet at the street intersection that ran straight into the river. Mr. Peplow supported the existing sign, but said any new signage should comply with sign code. Ms. Clarke said the sign had legal, non-conforming status and could stay forever in its present form. The church could come into compliance with the current regulations of the community, and this was a suggested trade-off. Mr. Sutphen, Mr. Harian, and Mr. -Rauh all liked the sign. Mr. Ferrara said he was glad the ARB would be reviewing this application because it was a classh example of architecture and was one of the prettiest churches he has ever seen. He suggested that the church provide a history of the sign. Ms. Boring said no other church had a changeable copy sign; however the ARB might provide its recommendation. Mr. Rauh agreed. Mr. Rauh made the motion to approve this application with the following 12 conditions: 1) That Sells Alley be vacated on the site subject to City.. Council. approval and that a vacation plat be submitted, prior to review of the final development plan; 2) That following alley vacation, all lots on the west side of Franklin Street be combined; 3) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staff approval; 4) That the Architectiual Review Board and the applicant review and make a recommendation regarding the existing ground sign; 5) That -the landscape plan conform to Code, include a property perimeter buffer along the south property line, and show screening of all parking lots including the lot east of Franklin Street, subject to staff approval; 6) That a brick sample panel be submitted for staff review to assure coordination with the blended brick on the historic structure; 7) That stormwater management meet the approval of the City Engineer; 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 3, 1996 - Page 10 8) That right-of--way consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan be dedicated to the City by means of a general warranty deed; 9) That all conditions imposed by the Architectural Review Board be met; 10) That parking spaces along Franklin Street be 19 feet in length and include wheel stops as far as practicable; 11) That a sidewalk be constructed along Franklin Street, except as waived by Council; and 12) That a site dimension plan be submitted to the Planning Division within two weeks. Mr. Kent agreed to the above amended conditions. ~ Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Ferrara, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; and Mr. Yom- (AFProved 7-0.) 6. Rezoning Application Z96-009 - Pe ' eter Center - Subarea G -Multi-Family Tim Evans said changes to the legal scription and site layout be submitted, and tonight's discussion is strictly informal. This ~ a rezoning for 13.1 acr from PCD, Planned Co rce District, to PLR, Planned Low nsity Residential District for 198 apartments in -story buildings. The site is located o the south side of Perimet Drive. Mr. Evans said old, Euro -style architecture, in ee story buildings, s' to Victorian Gate, in Columbus, will used. Garages will the back properly line, utting the retail service area. Materials elude cut stone, brick, ufactured stone, stucco wood shingles in earthtone colors. . The site is in a esignated Activity Cent as identified in the 198 Community Plan and is appropriate fo ulti-family housing. Th density is 15 du/acre, the ghest inDublin. Staff feels the parking do should be examined a e final development pl stage. Fees in the amount of $121,434 ' lieu of parkland will be aid. He sa' staff recommends appr al of the project with 12 nditions: 1) That public water extended to the weste undary of the site, and plans for construction meet approval of the City E r, 2} That cross-acces easements be recorded proof of such be provided to staff before issuance of a b ding permit; 3) That within 1 days of Planning Commis on approval, the applicant's engineer meet with Enginee ' staff to review design construction drawings; 4) That sto water management for site meet the approval of the City Engineer; S) That the hotel parking lot be scree ed one year following hotel occupancy (expected Fall 1998) if the outparcel is not yet der development; 6) That fire suppression system comply with requirements of the Washington Township Fire Department; 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II BOARD ORDER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD OCTOBER 23, 1996 C17'Y OF DUBLIN 5800 Sliiet Rings Road Oublin, OH 43016-7245 Phone/TOD: 614/161-6550 Fax:614/161-6506 :,.w CASE 1. Application ARB96-008 -Dublin Community Church - 81 West Bridge Street Location: Existing church and single-family residence located on 2.320 acres on the southwest corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street and an existing parking lot located on 0.306 acres on the southeast corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. Existing Zoning: CCC, Central Community Commercial District and R-4, Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a proposed 16,000 square foot sanctuary/kitchen addition and parking lot expansion for an existing church and demolition of an existing single-family residence. Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing church and parking Iot. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c!o Paul W. 1'hilfips, 2885 West Dublin- Granville Road, Columbus, Ohio 43235; and Jeffrey S. Kent, 1360 Briarcliffe Drive, Powell, Ohio 43065. MOTION 1: To approve the church and parking lot expansion with the following six conditions: 1) That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staff approval; A 2) That the landscape plan show screening of all parking lots and comply with the Landscape Code, subject to staff approval; 3) That a sample of the proposed shutter color be submitted; 4) That all mechanical units, both ground and/or roof mounted be fully screened to Code; 5) That exterior lighting be a historic-type, comply with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines, subject to staff approval; and 6) That all conditions imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission be met. VOTE: 4-0 RESULT: This application was approved with conditions. 99-1312 Page 1 of 2 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II BECO DF.D VO STAFF CERTIFICATION Kerry Donahue Yes Larry Frimerman Yes Bill Miller Yes Carole Olshavsky Absent Mary H. ewcomb Marian Vance Yes Graduate Landscape Architect MOTION 2: To approve the demolition of the single-family residence to allow for the expansion of the church and the parking lot. } voTE: 4-0 RESULT: The demolition was approved. RECORDED VOTES: STAFF CERTIFICATION Kerry Donahue Yes Larry Frimerman ' Yes C~ Bill Miller Yes Carole Olshavsky Absent Mary Newcomb Marian Vance- Yes Graduate .Landscape Architect MOTION That the existing changeable copy ground sign be modified as follows, subject to staff approval: install landscaping around the base; change sign illumination from interior to exterior; repaint the white border around the sign to a softer color; and change the shape of the top of the sign to reflect the Gothic arch details of the church and the proposed addition. VOTE: 4-0 RESI7LT: This motion was approved. This motion was in response to the Planning Commission's request for ARB to make a recommendation regarding the changeable copy sign. RECORD ,D VO S• STAFF CERTIFICATION Kerry Donahue Yes Larry Frimerman Yes 4'~ Bill Miller Yes Carole Olshavsky Absent Mary Newcomb Marian Vance Yes Graduate Landscape Architect 99-1312 Page 2 of 2 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _ Minutes otbublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Meeting _ ~ i Held November 4, 1996 ~ 9 ~ + i Administrative Committee will 'citing applications to fill this position. 2. Noted that a letter to the ode to today'a yj1]ag~ contacted incorrect information regarding the taking of t yard property for the Coffman Road projxt. This is actually city-owned ' t-of--way, and he was surprised at this misinformation in ' of all of the m s with the residents. 3. Reported a received a letter from a Dublin residect regarding the r7ity of a skat d component in a City park The resident asked that this nsiderod in the p for future packs. I. Mr. ry responded that this was explored in the past, but duet a liability issues i veil, the City chose not to offer this actmty in Dublin p t! M TABLED O DINANC'F:S N, Ordinanu No. 92-96 - An Ordinance Authorize the City Manager to Enter into an i~ u Agreement Leasing a 3.780+/- Parcel on BI Parkway, Dublin, Ohio to Washin on Township. (Second teading/pubGc heanrt led until November 4, 1996) Mr. Hanslry stated that negotiations a continuing and he would recommend g this until November 18. H Mr. Zawaly moved to table th~¢ubGc hearing/second reading of the ord' ce ur?td November k i 8, 1996. ~ =1 Mrs. Stillwell second motion. I~ -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, y Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. ffide Pittaluga, yes• .Boring, Yes; Mr. CamP~, Yom; Mr• Y. Yes. t= P1B.I_ A iTV. Ordinance No. 115-95(Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for Two Tracts Being 0.306 and 2.320 Acres of Land Located on the South Side of Bridge Streit and East and West Sides of Franklin Street from: CCC, Central Community Commercial and R-4, Suburban Residential District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Dublin Community Church) (Applicant: Dublin Community Church, Paul W. Phillips, 2885 W. Dublin-Granville Road, i• Columbus, OH 43235) Registered as proponents of the rezoning were: Richard A Harkiess, M-E Civil Engineering, 500 S. Front Street, Columbus OH 43215; Timothy W. Reardoq 5875 Griffiths Lane; lames G Ramry, 2564 Stanford Drive; Douglas Kennedy, 5658 Tara hill Drive' and Jeff Kent. Registered as opponents of the rezoning were: Kathryn Haydocy, 56 Franklin Street, and Adam Rinehart, 80 Franklin Street. Mr. Campbell stated that he will abstain from voting on this matter and left the room during the discussion. Ms. Clarke stated that the church has operated since 1878 at this site. The front portion of the site carves commercial zoning, and the application includes a single family house on Franklin I`: Street currently zoned R-4. Staff has tried to mead the past standards with Dublin's current i zoning standards while accommodating the expansion. The expansion includes a larger parking lot, building addition, and demolition of the single family homy The expansion will be on the back side where there is wrrently a parking lot. She noted that the expansion of the parking lot will include a landscaped area addition to soften and screen the bt from view. Matching brick and architecture will be used on the expansion. The church will ensure that the necessary vacations have been done for the alleys prior to the initiation of construction. Planning Commission recommended approval unanimously on October 3 with 12 conditions listed in the Record of Action: 1. That Sells Alley be vacated on the site subject to City Council approval and that a vacation plat be submitted, prior to review of the final development plan; 2. That following alley vacation, all lots on the west side of Franklin Street be combined; 3. That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staffapproval; 4. That the Architeuutal Review Board and the applicant review and make a recommendation regarding the existing ground sign; 5. That the landscape plan conform to Code, include a properly perimeter buffer along the south property line, and show screening of ail parking lots including the lot east of Franklin Street, subject to statTapproval; 99-1312 Rezoning Application RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _ Minutes o$hrbGn City Couna7 Meeting Paste 4 Meeting .~~r.~._ _ Held Novembu 4, 1996 19 i i Administrative Committee will 'citing applications to fill this position. 2. Noted that a letter to the cell rn today's YtllBget contained incorrax infortttation I rcgardiag the taking of t yard property for the Coffman Road projax. This is - I actuallycity-owned " t-0f-way, and he was surprised at this tttisinformation in ' of all of the s with the residents. 3. Reported a received a letter from a Dublin resident regarding the bility of a skat d component in a City park. The resident asked that this nsidered in the i p for firdrrc parks. L Mr. ey responded that this was explored in the past, but duet liability issues j; i v the chose not to offu this acLivi eel, City ty in Dublin p i~ ~i TAB FD O IN NCFS I Ordinance No. 91-96 - M Ordinance Anthorizi the City Manager to Enter Into an q Agreement Lcasiag a 3.780+/- Parcel on BI Parkway, Dnblia, Ohio to Washio on Township. (Second reading/pubGc heann led until November 4, 199 Mr. Hanslty stated that negotiations continuing and he would recommend to g this until Novembu 18. ~ jj Mr. Zawaly moved to table th~ublic hearurg/second reading of the ord' until Novembu:i I8, 1996. - ~I Mrs. Stillwell second d~motion. 1 -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Kranstubu, Y Mr. McCash, yes- Ms. Aide Pittaluga, Yes' . Botutg, Yes: Mr. Campbell, Ya: Mr• Y. Ya• P 1B I . .A 1N . Ordinance No. 115-95(Amcndcd) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoaiag for Two Tracts Being 0.306 and 2.320 Acres of Land Located on the South Side of Bridge Street and East gad War Sides oCFraaklin Street from: CCC, Central Community Commercial and R-4, Suburban Raideatial District to: PUD, Planned Unit i' Development District. (Dublin Community Chnrch) i (Applicant: Dublin Community Church, Paul W. Phillips, 2885 W. Dublin-Granville Road, Columbus, OH 43235) Reg~stued as proponents of the rezoning wue: Richard A Harldas, M-E Civil Engineering, 500 S. Front Street, Columbus OH 43215; Tuttothy W. Reardoq 5875 Griffiths Lane; James I! Ramey, 2564 Stanford Drive; Douglas Kennedy, 5658 Tara ITill Drive; and Jeff Kart. Registued as opponents of the rezoning wue: Kathryn Haydocy, 56 Franklin Street, and ' Adam Rinehart, 80 Frar?Idin Street_ Mr. Campbell stated that he will abstain from voting on this matte and left the room during the diswssion. ~ Ms. Clarke stated that the church has operated since 1878 at this site. The front portion of the site tames commeraal zoning, and the application includes a single family house on Franklin Street currently zoned R-4. Staff has tried to meld the past standards with Dublin's aurent ; zoning standards while accommodating the expansion. The expansion includes a largo parking lot, building addition, and demolition of the single family home. The expansion will be on the back side whue thue is currently a parking lot. She noted that the expansion of the parking lot will include a landscaped area addition to soften and screen the lot from view. Matching brick and architecture will be used on the expansion. The church will ensure that the necessary vacations have been done for the alleys prior to the initiation of construction Planning Commission recommended approval unanimously on Odoba 3 with 12 conditions ' listed in the Record of Action: 1. That Sells Alley be vacated on the site subject to City Council approval and that a vacation plat be submitted, prior to review of the final development plan; 2. That following atley vacation, all lots on the west side of Frankdin Strcet be combined; 3. That a tree preservation plan be submitted, subject to staff approval; 4. That the Archittctural Review Board and the applicant review and make a recommendation regarding the existing ground sign; 5. That the landscape plan conform to Coda include a property perimtter buffer ak?etg the south property line, and show screening of all parking lots including the lot east of f ranklin Strcet, subjeu to staff approval; 99-1312 Rezoning Application RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes o$htbGn ~Y Couap'l Meeting Page S Ma~B Held November 4, 1996 19 , 6. That a brick supple panel be submitted for ata8'review to assuro ooocdination with the blended bride on the historic tttucttue; 7. That storm water maangement meet the approval of the (',rty Engineer; y 8. That right-of--way oooastent with the Thorougl~fue Plan be dodicxtod to the City by means of a general wammty deed; 9. That all cortditioos imposed by the At+chitectural Review Board be met; 10. That parking spaces along Franklin Street be 19 feet in length and indude wheel hops . as far u prsarcabk; 11. That a sidewalk be oonsttuded along Franklin Street, except u watwod by Counc+~; sad H 12. That a ate dimenaon plan be utbmitted to the Planning Division within two wedcs. ~ . Staff recommends approval of this application which represents a goat opporttmity for compromise - tneetiag the dwrcft's ands for expansion and mating more of Dublin's standards than the itu attr+eatly does. Mr. McCash asked if the tight-of--way dedication is consistent with Dublin's thoroughfare ping noting that wideinng of 161 to the south adc would require rdocatioa of grays. Ms. Clarice responded that this condition relates to providing land for im~trovutg the Franklin Street intersoaion if needed is the fiiture. 4` Mr. McCash atatod that he is concerned with the aesthetics of the church itsdL If the right-of- is way is granted, the (',rty would lr7cdy use it. Ms. Clarice responded that it would be very cult to relocate the graves and sodalky unacceptable. 1`u. McCash asked what is the lilccJiliood that sidewalks will be installed along Franklin Street and should this appGextit be required to pay for these. i! Ms. Clarice responded that the current Code requires installation of sidewalks, but Council can choose to waive this requireatent. Mr. Z.awaly asked if all conditions imposed by the Architectural Re~zew Board, referenced in condition #9, have hoes delineated. Ms_ Clarke responded that the board orders are attached to the staff report, and the applicant has egad to comply with all of the orders. IsgKtnt, constttiaion rnaaager for the project stated that the clairch wants W expand their I! facilities to avoid having split services oo Sundays. A fellowship hall well be located on the bwer lewd of the expansion. He that the landscaping will be brought up to Code along Frankm Street. A small commercial kitchen well be located in the fellowship hall, and the dumpstcr has bees located dose to the kitchen uta. They are trying to save some existing uas along the west and south properties. The architecture will replicate the detail work of the old building. Rick Harkless, M-F Rngjneering stand that the parking lot will mat the Cit}rs drainage ' standards for undergouad systems. Mr. Kent testified that he has agoed to comply with all of the board orders from the ; Mchitectural Review Board. Tim Reardon. 975 .rill; h~ ~n .stated that he supports the application and has no further testimony to provide. Jim Ramey_ 2564 Starford Drive stated that he serves on the Grounds Committer from the church. Thry wi71 have a fellowship hall with this expansion and it will serve many community groups, including the Dublin food pantry operations. Kathy Haydocv. S6 Fta~klin St-cell stated that site is a lifelong resident of the City and lives directly across the sires from the boost being demoGslted. Ha concern is with the parking lot and the comnicraal mtung which could bring ewrtt trace commercial zoning to the uea. 1\trs. rtl responded that this applicatan is for a PUD, not for a straight oottin+ercSal 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes o>bubGn Gitq Courts'[ Meeting Page 6 Meeting --~-..a::~ ~ _ - November4, 1996 __19 Held zoning. Ms. Clarke stated that from staff's perspective, there is better protection in a PUD than with the existing zoning which would allow a variety of commercial uses on the front piece. It can now only be uscd for a church. Adam 1Znehart 8Q F nklin Street stated that he is concerned that the razing of the house aaoss the street and the aesthetics of looking at a sea of blacktop. Marty Old Dublin j businesses have been granted variances from parking requirements, and he is unclear about u why staff has recommended razing of a house for parking purposes. He requested that this portion of the PUD be elimir?ated. I' Doug Kennedy 5658 T ra dl Drive stated that he is a metnber of the church Couna7 and favors the project. The house was formcdy used as a parsonage, but ministers now prefer to own their own homes for retirement purposes. The church seeds additional parking to enable ai! membas to attend the same service. He added that if someone wants the house, the church will allow it to be removed and relocated. Mr. McCash suggested that the applicant explore sharing the expanded parking lot with the Old Dublin businesses for daytime trse. Mr. Kennedy responded that the pceschooi is located at the church during the daytime and the I. church leases space to the Old Firehouse businesses. He indicated, however, that he would be willing to diswss shared parking arrangements with the Old Dublin businesses. In response to Ms. Bide Pittaluga, Mr. Kennedy stated that they are willing to donate the house to anyone who wants it, but it would have to be removed within construction.' timefiarrres. Ma or Krarrstuber r uested that the a licant rovide Council with an u { Y eq PP P plate on their effbns to pursue the shared parking prior to the vote on November l8. I Mrs. Boring asked if all of the drainage issues have been resolved. j; Ms. Clarke responded that these wilt be addressed at the final development plan stage when the i; final engineering is completed. Mr. Iiarkless commented that they submitted final calwlations to the engineering division last I! week and are working out the issues with Mr. Bowman. t: Mr. Zawaly asked if the third reading should be waived to meet their timefiames. Mr. Kennedy responded that it is not necessary to waive the third reading.. There will be a third reading and vote on the ordinance on November 18. Ordinance No. 97- Aarended) - An Ordinance Amendi he Annual Appropriations for the Ficcai r Ending December 31,1996. Ms. Grigsb oted that the ordinance has been amend o include a correction in Section 3 where t amount should be 537,400. Mr. waly moved to amend the ordinance per eversion submitted to Council in ctober 31 packet- ' Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motto Vote on the motion - Mr. Cam es; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor anstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, Yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes- s. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Vote on the ordinance - r Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; s. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Cam yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, Yes; Mr. cCash, yes. / Ordinance No -96(Amtadtd) - An Ordioance R eating Ordinance No. 32-9,"~ ("Compeer roa Plan's and All Amendments rcto (Ordinance Nos. 94, 12- , 51-95, 06-96 and 94-9f7, and Ado erg in lien Thereof a Nei Pla or the City of Dublin. / 99-131 Z Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II _ ECORD OF PROCEE NGS Minutes of Meetin el November 18, 1996 ~ 19 I options to see if both issues can be ccommodated at the same time without maki them incompatible. Mrs. Boring agreed that a would like to d'ued staff that in their study the other issue they . consider this propo a viable option. Mr. Zawaly crated that the only problem he sees in one o e other scenario is that there may be yet other alternative or another option that mak erase and that will accommodate the zo ' the traffic, and everything involved. .Hensley agreed, adding that this would invol a larger study and more time. Mayor Kranstuba sununarized that staff d review this proposal over the next few w to see if something can be worked out t accommodate it. t^ouncil Round Table " Mrs. Bonne noted that a m was contained in the packet about liquor 't renewals and = asked about the status of liquor permits for the gas station on Brid treet across from the school Mr. Smith respond at he recalls sending a memo to Council this matter, but he will check on this. stated that: 1. a Old Dublin Spirit Shop opened last rsday-, he encouraged everyone to stop by and vrsit the shop over the holiday s He also noted that Washington To hip Fue Chief Gene Bostic has been named the honoree for the 1997 Emuald He congratulated Chief Bostic on this honor. t EGICL.ATION THIILD REA_DINC Ordinance No. 115-95(Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for Two Tracts Being 0.306 and 2.320 Acres of Land Located on the South Side of Bridge Street and East and Wtst Sides oCFranklin Street from: CCC, Central Community Commercial and R-4, Suburban Residential District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Dublia Community Church) (Applicant: Dublin Community Church, Paul W. Phr7h'ps, 2885 W. Dublin-Granville Road, Columbus, OH 43235) Mayor Kranstuber asked if anyone was present representing the developer. There was a pending issue at the last hearing regarding a shared parking arrangement with the merchants in the area. Dou ennedv stated that they have not worked out the arrangement at this time. A lease has been drawn up and they are negotiating a price at this time. Mayor ICranstuber moved approval of the ordinance with the conditions of Planning Commission Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Ms. Bide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor ICranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, abstain. ! ~ Mr. Campbell noted that he is abstaining because he is a member of the church. i II 1; Ordinance No. 91-96 - A rdinance Authorizing the City Manag o Enter into an Agreement Leasing .780+/-Parcel on Blazer Parkway, Dubli ,Ohio to Washington ~i Township. (Seto readingJpublic hearing tabled until Novemb 8, 1996) Mr. Hensley that Council leave this on the table as the torncys are still fi - language i e agreemcr?t. Mrs. S ' well moved to table Ordinance No. 91-96 u ~ Decembu Z, 1996. 99-1312 pbett seconded the motion. Rezoning Application etc on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes- s. stillwell, yes; Mr. McCash Old Dublin Town Center II DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION September 2, 1999 CITI OF Dl'BLI;~ ,r,~psion of Mami~g 0 Shier-Rings Road Oha 43016-1236 hone/IDO: 614-161 X550 fmc:6l4-161-6566 teb Site: www.dubl'm.ah.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 8. Concept Plan 99-081CP -Old Dublin Town Center, Phase 2 -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street Location: 3.56 acres located on the southeast and southwest corners of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Rte, Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of concept plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.056. Proposed Use: Existing church and parking lot and new 10,450 square foot commercial building with restaurant, retail and office uses. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c/o Paul Phillips, 36 Franklin Street, Dublin, Ohio, 43017; and Patrick Grabill, King Thompson, 5500 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION: To approve this concept plan with seven conditions: 1) That the .applicant meet with the Franklin Street residents regarding this proposal; 2) That brick sidewalks be extended south along both sides of Franklin Street; 3) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 4) That a detailed landscape plan, including buffering from the adjacent residential property, and a tree survey, tree preservation and tree replacement plans be submitted at the time of the preliminary development plan (rezoning); 5) That architecture and signage be consistent with those for Old Dublin Town Center I; Page 1 of 2 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION R i 1 RD OF ACTION Member 2, 1999 S. Concept Plan 99-OSLCP - Oic~ L>ublin Town Center, Phase 2 -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street 6) That signage meet the requirements of the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines and the Sign Code; and 7) That a stormwater managemen~ plan be submitted with the preliminary development plan. * Patrick Grabill agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This concept plan was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION ICJ ~ Suzanne . Wingenfield Planner Page 2 of 2 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II _ I Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission .Minutes -September 2, 1999 Page 22 12) That the homeowners' assoc~ ion maintain ail common operty; and ~ 13) That Coriditions 1, 2 and be met prior to this case eing scheduled '~~r Ci Council consideration. Ben Hale agreed to the ab ve conditions. Mr. Hari seconded the motion ::;~d the vote was as follows: Mr. Easte ,yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; r. Sprague, yes; Mr. lider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. H ian, yes; and Mr. Fishm ,yes. (Approved 7-0. k 7. Final P t 99-075FP -Kendall "dge, Section 2 This case w been postponed prior to a meeting until a lat date. Notices were sent to the property pers. There was no dis ssion or vote taken. 8. Concept Plan 99-081CP -Old Dublin Town Center, Phase 2 -Franklin Street and West Bridge Street Suzanne Wingenfield said this concept plan includes the Dublin Community Church, its parking lot and a duplex on Franklin Street in Old Dublin. She said the church and a small parking lot on the southeast corner of Franklin and Bridge Streets were rezoned PUD in 1996. The corner is proposed for a new 10,000 square foot building. All the church property is included in this application, but no changes are proposed to the church itself. Ms. Wingenfield said the Architectural Review Board (ARB) informally considered this on August 25, and generally supported it. The ARB wanted attention to be given to landscaping and screening of the proposed parking lot from the homes on Franklin Street and to pedestrian connections between the parking lot and the building. She showed slides of the area. She said an alley south of the corner lot is proposed for development. The duplex will be razed. and replaced by a 76-space parking lot. She referenced the Old Dublin Area Plan of the Community Plan. The proposed building is two stories with restaurant and office uses. The architecture will be similar to that of the building under construction at Bridge and High Street. Materials include brick and cedar siding, asphalt shingles and standing seam metal roofs. Specific materials and colors must be submitted for approval by the ARB. She said the brick sidewalks along Bridge Street should be extended down Franklin Street with benches, etc. A fence is proposed along the parking lot, and it should be either brick or stone to serve as a buffer along the homes. She said the plan needs more interior landscaping, street trees along Franklin Street, additional parking lot buffering, and tree preservation. Ms. Wingenfield said it is consistent with the Old Dublin character. Staff suggests additional work on the parking lot layout, pedestrian connections to the building, and sidewalks, lighting, etc. along Franklin Street. Staff recommends approval with seven conditions: 1) That the applicant meet with the Franklin Street residents regarding this proposal; 2) That brick sidewalks be extended south along both sides of Franklin Street; 3) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II _ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 2, 1999 Page 23 . 4) That a detailed landscape plan, including buffering from the adjacent residential property, and a tree survey, tree preservation and tree replacement plans be submitted at the time of the preliminary development plan (rezoning}; 5) That architecture and signage be consistent wit those for Old Dublin Town Center I; 6) That signage meet the requirements of the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines and the Sign Code; and 7) That a stormwater management plan be submitted with the preliminary development plan. _ Ms. Wingenfield said Council granted a sidewalk waiver to the church for the west side of Franklin Street. New development increases the need for sidewalks. The applicant had suggested additional pavers across Franklin Street from the parking lot. She said a sidewalk on the east side of Franklin Street, along this site's frontage, was necessary. Mr. Sprague noted that an opposing letter was received from John and Sue Stroefer concerning traffic and lot coverage in Old Dublin. Mr. Eastep suggested "cul de saaing" Franklin Street, and Ms. Wingenfield said this was not currently being studied. MS Consultants is examining the possible road extension behind the library and the proposed median on Bridge Street. Mr. Eastep thought a cul de sac should be studied so that more commercial property does not encroach on the residential area. Mr_ Eastep noted there have been many complaints about Old Dublin parking. He asked if the parking deficiency was calculated for Phases 1 and 2. Ms. Wingenfield said this proposal is about 30 spaces short. Phase 1, under construction, was about 100 parking spaces short. She said the City is trying to locate additional parking in Old Dublin, as well as working out shared parking lots. The Code does not differentiate between Old Dublin and Kroger for calculating parking. She said there is parking to the rear of the first building. Mr. Eastep asked if Franklin Street is curbed and guttered_ Ms. Wingenfield said no. Mr. Eastep said it should be done to prevent parked cars from creating ruts. Mr. Eastep asked about the status of standards for all of Old Dublin. Ms. Wingenfield said an ordinance was being written, and the architectural design guidelines are nearly complete. Mr. Harlan asked how this project related to the new guidelines. Ms. Wingenfield said it mirrors them almost exactly _ This proposed text is almost the same as the approved Phase I text. Mr. McCash asked if the design guidelines address permitted/conditional uses and the mix of uses, or shared parking, as the "Historic Development District" ordinance would do. He said outdoor seating requires a conditional use application costing $2,140. Ms. Wingenfield said the design guidelines do not address land use or parking. She said the design guidelines will be finished in September, and the HDD ordinance should be complete by the end of this year. David King, Horne and King Architects, said the uses here will include retail on the first floor. He said this is a concept plan. He said they intended to take the existing brick sidewalk on 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center TT Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ~ . Minutes -September 2, 1999 Page 24 High Street; south on at least the east side of Franklin Street. He said there are trees. on the right-of--way or setback line on Franklin Street. The sidewalk could be at the curb, the edge of pavement, or inside the tree line. Mr. King said their parking accounts for the pocket of outdoor seating at the corner. He said a restaurant is proposed between the toy store and this building. There will be a screened dumpster close to the south property line. He said at ARB, the preference was all masonry screening. Mr. Grabill suggests it be stone. Mr. King said their concept was to treat this as an urban lot, where the perimeter is heavily screened, yielding the maximum spaces. The alley system can be used as suggested in the Community Plan to create circulation loops. A one-way system, using the alley as part of the loop system, provides the most parking spaces and screening. Interior landscaping, would be a grated tree with the addition of a wrought iron fence surrounding it. Mr. King responded to the two letters provided to him. He said the sidewalk on the west side was not brought up at the ARB meeting, and he was not aware of it until the staff report. Patrick Grabill, applicant, said the church approached them. To make the parking work in Old Dublin, Dublin needs to create a municipal parking authority. Many cities have done this and it works well. He said they promised the church to do the parking lot prior to the building. He said it would be better to get pedestrian traffic to the west side. He suggested the whole area be brick pavers. Mr. Grabill had no problem with cul de sacing Franklin Street, but he felt it was the residents' issue. Mr. Grabill said at the 109 and 91 South High Street buildings, there was an alley with parking on both sides. By utilizing this circulation pattern, -the power lines here will not have to be moved, and it maximizes the parking. Mr. McCash said in municipal parking authorities, the parking lots were typically owned by the city. Mr. Grabill said their intention was that the if the parking authority is created, they would lease the parking lots to Dublin for one dollar a year for open parking, with the caveat that the Dublin Community Church has the right to use it. The uses proposed here are opposite to the church's peak times. Mr. McCash suggested working with other Old Dublin merchants on joint parking agreements for this lot. Mr. Grabill said they were interested in working with everybody involved, but traffic circulation and overall parking issues have to be addressed by the City. He thought Dublin was doing a good job of trying to get ahead of those issues. Mr. Eastep said the more Old Dublin is piecemealed, the less chance there is of doing an Old Dublin Plan. Mr. Grabill agreed. Mr. Eastep said in order for him to vote favorably for this application, he wanted Mr. Grabill to work with staff on a traffic circulation solution. 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ~ _ Minutes -September- 2, 1999 Page 25 Mr. Sprague asked if the circulation pattern proposed are consistent with utilization of the Old Dublin alleys. Mr. King thought it did. He thought all the alleys should be used for head in . parking as a group system_ Mr. King would like to see Mill Lane closed off to increase parking. The alleys become part of the parking lot, in an elongated parking system, as well as a pedestrian linkage system. Mr. Harian liked the look of Dublin Town Center, Phase I and the look of this building. His only concern was the traffic on Franklin Street. Mr. Fishman also liked the look of this project. He was v~r concerned about future traffic and parking problems. Mr. Fishman said Old Dublin would look better than it did in the 60s. Before rezoning, he thought the ordinance and overall parking plan should be complete. Mr. McCash said overall, the concept was great. However, issues regarding parking and circulation needed to be addressed. Design guidelines will be nice for the overall appearance, but he said the available uses are not addressed. Variances and conditional use procedures need to be clarified as well as the zoning ordinance. Without them, nothing can be done to revitalize Old Dublin. He said Dublin's red tape is creating the problems with redevelopment of Old Dublin. He wished the Historic Development District ordinance would be completed to take care of the use issues. He said rezoning individual pieces in PCDs and PUDs is not the solution. He could not support rezoning the site. Mr. Sprague favored this concept plan, and he wanted the applicant to continue to work with the area residents. He wanted to single out Pat Grabill for his revitalization of Old Dublin. He greatly appreciated all of Mr.. Grabill's effort. Mr. Peplow also applauded Mr. Grabill's attempt to revitalize Old Dublin. He loved this concept plan. His biggest concern was the traffic circulation. This plan could be used as a catalyst to move in that direction as soon as possible. Mr. Eastep said he wholeheartedly appreciated the efforts of Mr. King and Mr. Grabill. He does not want to piece the puzzle together; he wants an overall plan. Franklin Street needs to be studied, therefore, he could not support this concept. Mr. Lecklider said there was a pressing need to have the ordinance finalized. He shared the concerns of the other Commissioners in respect to parking, traffic circulation and impact on residents. He complemented Mr. King and Mr. Grabill on this concept plan. Mr. Grabill said they kept the proposed ordinance in mind when designing the project. The Dublin Community Church had a financial need for him to move forward on this. He asked for a favorable consideration. He said they will work on the parking and traffic. Mr. Grabill agreed to all the above conditions. Mr. Fishman did not think the church opposed the sidewalk, they only wanted Mr. Grabill to pay for it. Mr. Grabill said that was not in their 99-1312 Rezoning Application OId Dublin Town Center II w_..:- _ . _ ~s~..n~.~.~.. _ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission - - Minutes - Septerrtber 2, 1999 Page 26 transaction for this small building. Mr. McCash said Council gave a sidewalk waiver to the church as .part of their development. Mr. Grabill thought they could work through the issue. Mr. McCash questioned whether this site should be rezoned to PUD rather than a HDD type of District. He said tl~e concept was great. Mr. Fishman said the Commission was happy with this concept plan, but not without having an overall ordinance for the entire Old Dublin area, the alley situation, and Franklin Street traffic. Mr. McCash said he would vote yes for the concept plan, but he could not support the rezoning of the site. Mr. Fishman agreed. Mr. McCash made the motion to approve this concept plan with seven conditions: 1) That the applicant meet with the Franklin Street residents regarding this proposal; 2) That brick sidewalks be extended south along both sides of Franklin Street; 3) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 4) That a detailed landscape plan, including buffering from the adjacent residential property, and a tree survey, tree preservation and tree replacement plans be submitted at the time of the preliminary development plan (rezoning); 5) That architecture and signage be consistent with those for Old Dublin Town Center I; 6) That signage meet the requirements of the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines and the Sign Code; and 7) That a stormwater management plan be submitted with the preliminary development plan. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion and, the vote was as follows: Mr. Harian, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. McCash, yes. (Approved 7-0.) The meeting was adjourned at 12:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Libby Farley Administrative Secretary Planning Division 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II .n.e_.".~ , _ I • RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Meeting October 4, 1999 ~ 'i 1 Held IYE.~RI - OTHRR - - I Old Dublin Town Center -Concept Plan (Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c/o Paul ~ Phillips, 36 Franklin Street, Dublin, OH 43017; and Patrick Grabill, King Thompson, SS00 I I Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017.) ~ Ms. Clarke stated this concept plan is for three and''/z aa-es located on the southeast and ~ ~ southwest comers of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street. The site includes the Dublin I , Community Church and the duplex that is on Franklin Street as well as an existing parking , ~I lot. The proposal is for a new building of 10,400 square feet which would be located on the southeast comer within Old Dublin. This is Phase 2 of the Old Dublin Town Center project, I~ and the plan calls for similar shops and similar uses- There would be a larger parking lot located to the south, and this would include some vacation of alleys. This was reviewed by i the Planning Commission on September 2, 1999 and approved by a vote of 7-0 with 7 i conditions as contained in the Record of Action of"September 2, 1999. She noted that a i concept plan is not binding upon the applicant or the City. Ii David Kine. Horne and Kins Architects stated that he was present to respond to any ~ questions from Council. i Mr. Adamek asked for clarification of the exact area for which this is being proposed. ~I Mr. Grabill clarified that the existing house would be demolished on the site and the property i will become a parking lot. That parking lot would incorporate the alley system. The lot ~ immediately west of the Dublin Toy store would be used for the nvo story structure. i Mr. Adamek asked if these uses are consistent with what Council has already approved. tj Mc Grabill responded affirmatively -there will be retail on the first floor and/or restaurants, with the second floor as office. The parking provided will serve the two developments. i Mr. Grabill added that the church will use this tot to accommodate parking for their Sunday services. ' Mr. Adamek asked if the ne~v development would then have use of the parking at the church i) during normal business hours when the church is not utilizing the parking. ~ Mr. Grabill responded that they have had informal discussions, but not at the church board ~ ~E level. He recommended that the City take a comprehensive look at the area when ~ ~I considering implementation of a municipal parking authority. The church is the seller in this transaction, and they made a commitment to the church that they will not lose parking during ~ the construction period. ;I ~ Mr. Grabill added that there is tremendous opportunity in Old Dublin and the City of Dublin j ji has gone a long way in trying to be part of the solution. The City still needs to take more of a leadership role as the small business shop owners don't have the capital to do the t ' infrastructure. However, once the City makes the initial investment, the private sector will ~ follow. ~ ! Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the Old Dublin Town Center Concept Plan. Mc Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr" McCash, yes; Mc Peterson, yes; Mc Adamek, yes; Mayor I; Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. i i Amberlei h North. Sectio S Cluster Site - Preli inarv Plat ~ and Re uest for Waive of Trec Re tacement ee Rc uircd er the Tree reservation I Ordinance I r, Mayor Kranstuber st• ed that Mr. Reiner will bstain on these issues. M .Reiner then left ' Council Chambers II Ms" Clarke state . Amberleigh North was ezoned to include a cluster ire on the premises. I The type of ho es was not defined, bu t was to be of the quality the Lea or Wcatherston developments. At th time of rezoning, a cond~ ron was added that the ' applicant b ' g the cluster product h to the Planning Commis on and to City Council for final appr al. This cluster plan as been revised since that ' to include multiple units and bull ngs rather than small 1 s which would have seriou y impacted the trees. Tf• - i 99-1312 Rezoning Application BOARD ORDER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD . December 15, 1999 CITI' 1)F n113L11~ „~;swn of Plaraang 2. Application 99-132ARB -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and 0 Shier-R'mgs Road Bridge Street Ohio 43016-1236 Location: 3.56 acres located on the southeast and southwest corners of Franklin me/FD0:614-161-6550 Street and Bridge Street. Fax:614-161-b566 Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development and R-4, Suburban Residential b Site: www.dubl'm.oh.us District. Request: Review and approval of the demolition of an existing two-family residence located immediately south of Sells Alley, 34 and 36 Franklin Street; and recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a rezoning from PUD, Planned Unit Development District and R-4, Suburban Residential District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: A two-story, 10,500 square foot building for restaurant, retail and office uses and a 69 space parking lot. Applicant: Dublin Community Church, c/o Paul Phillips, 36 Franklin Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and Patrick Grabill, King Thompson, 5500 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017. MOTION #1: To approve the demolition proposal with four conditions: 1) That the applicant submit a letter from the church documenting the deterioration of the building and the church's inability to economically restore it to other uses, subject to staff certification that the Code provisions concerning demolition are being met; 2) That the applicant obtain a demolition permit from the City prior to demolition; 3) That the applicant obtain site plan approval by ARB for the Old Dublin Town Center II project prior to approval of a demolition permit; and 4) That if a historic structure is found during demolition, the demolition is to cease. Bases: 1) The structure contains no features of architectural and historic significance to the character of the area. 2) Deterioration has progressed to the point where it is not economically feasible to restore the structure. *Pat Grabill agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 4-0-1 RESULT: The demolition proposal was approved. 99-1312 Page 1 of 3 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II BOARD ORDER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. BOARD I~,. ~cmber 15, 1999 2. Application 99-132ARB - OId Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and Bridge Street (cont.) k MOTION #{2: To reconvnend the rezoning request to the Planning Commission with fourteen conditions: 1) That the applicant meet with the Franklin Street residents regarding this proposal prior to the Planning Commission meeting; 2) That right-of--way along West Bridge Street consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan (56 feet from centerline) be deeded to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit; 3) That a vacation plat for Sells Alley be approved by City Council; 4) That the plan be revised to show the entire church site and Subareas 1 and 2 prior to being scheduled on the Planning Commission agenda; 5) That the text be revised by eliminating stucco and synthetic stucco as permitted building materials, eliminating outdoor seating as a permitted use for the existing church (Subarea 1), and permitting residential use on the second floor within Subarea 2; 6) That revised landscape plans, including tree preservation and replacement, showing conformance to the Landscape Code and development text be submitted prior to being scheduled on the Planning Commission agenda; 7) That architecture and signage be consistent with those for Old Dublin Town Center I; 8) That brick sidewalks be extended south along the east side of Franklin Street by the applicant, and that the City pursue with the church getting sidewalks on the west side or brick sidewalks across Franklin Street to connect the lots; 9) That signage meet the requirements of the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines and the Sign Code; 10) That a stormwater management plan meeting the requirements of the City Engineer be submitted prior to being scheduled on the Planning Commission agenda; 11) That plans for this proposal be submitted for ARB review and approval following rezoning approval by City Council; 12) That a lower stone wall (less than six feet in height) be part of the buffer for adjacent property; 13) That the applicant be permitted to install the parking lot base prior to constructing the building due to the church's need for additional parking; and 14} That plantings for the buffer to adjacent residences be in locations that are mutually agreeable to both parties. 99-1312 Page 2 of 3 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II BOARD ORDER ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD December 15, 1999 2. Application 99-132ARB -Old Dublin Town Center II -Franklin Street and Bridge Street (cont.) Bases: 1) The proposal continues the existing character of Old Dublin. 2) The proposal complies with the Community Plan. 3) The proposal will provide parking for the area. *Pat Grabill agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5-0 RESULT: The rezoning request received a favorable recommendation and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission. RECORDED VOTES: MOTION #1: MOTION #2: David Larson Yes Yes Larry Frimmerman Yes Yes Kris Swingle Yes Yes Richard Termeer Abstain Yes Janet Axene Yes Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION ~ , J n Talentino Planner Page 3 of 3 99-1312 Rezoning Application Old Dublin Town Center II x OLD DUBLIN TOWN CENTER 2 West Bridge Street at Franklin Street South of Bridge Street and both sides of Franklin Street DEVELOPMENT TEXT 6 Apri12000 21 Apri12000: Revised 6 October 2000: Revised GOAL It is the planning and azchitectural goal that development within this PUD be consistent with the existing development in Old Dublin. The development standazds in Old Dublin aze widely different from new development seen in Dublin. The text is intended to preserve those traditional standazds within Old Dublin. SUBAREA 1 -DUBLIN COMMUNITY CHURCH The development at the southwest corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street must be compatible with the surrounding environment, pazticulazly in terms of development standazds. The intent of this text is to manage the project site over the long term. The site is currently owned by the Dublin Community Chwch. The existing building and site aze not affected by this current redevelopment of Subazea 2. This text governs that site for any future changes to the new building or the site. PERMITTED USES Any future development must be consistent with the current use of the church facilities. The following is a list of the permitted uses: • Religious activities. • Social, educational, daycare, and fund raising activities in support of the church's religious mission including entertainment, dining, and classroom functions. • Permanent and temporary outdoor seating and playground areas associated with the above listed activities. If umbrellas are to be used in the outdoor seating azeas, they must be approved by the ARB. No signage is allowed on the umbrellas. All lighting for the outdoor seating areas must be approved by ARB and be consistent with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and meet the intent of the Old Dublin Design Guidelines. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored outside of the building. Speakers associated with the outdoor seating area(s) are prohibited. i 1 _ si - ~n,.~n 1.~ ~ ~ ~~~IGvlszs~_ CONDITIONAL USES The following uses are conditional and must receive approval from the Planning Commission and will require all applicable permits for special events or activities. • Additional outdoor seating or other outdoor usage associated with the previously listed permitted uses. SUBAREA 2 -COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT The development at the southeast corner of West Bridge Street and Franklin Street must be compatible with the surrounding environment, particularly in terms of development standards. The intent of this text is to manage the project and site over the long term. The site was previously owned by the Dublin Community Church. Ownership has been transferred to Grabill and Company, LLC. There is an existing two family building on the site located at 34 and 36 Franklin Street that will be demolished. The text governs Subarea 2 for any proposed future changes to the development. PERMITTED USES Developments must house multiple tenants and multiple uses to the extent possible. The following is a list of the permitted uses: • Commercial retail, financial institution, and art gallery on the first floor. • Business, medical office, and residential located on the second floor. • Outdoor seating area for permitted uses as approved at the time of rezoning. There will be a maximum of 1,850 square feet of outdoor seating area generally located along West Bridge Street and Franklin Street plus small amount to the south of the building. All plans must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to placing seating in this area. Please note that any seating placed in the right-of-way must receive approval of the City Engineer. If umbrellas are to be used in the outdoor seating areas, they must be approved by the ARB. No signage is allowed on the umbrellas. All lighting for the outdoor seating areas must be approved by ARB and be consistent with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and meet the intent of the Old Dublin Design Guidelines. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored outside of the building. Speakers associated with the outdoor seating area(s) are prohibited. 2 CONDITIONAL USES The following uses are conditional and must receive approval from the Planning Commission: • Additional outdoor seating or other outdoor usage associated with permitted uses. • Business, medical office, and residential located on the first floor. Restaurants, bars, taverns, pubs, or other eating/drinking establishments. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GOAL Old Dublin has a unique character. It is a blend of buildings, spaces, landscaping, street patterns, and other elements that have grown over time. New buildings in the district should be designed to fit into this strong existing context. The most appropriate designs for new buildings take into account the context, and make an effort to respect it and to fit in visually. New buildings, however, should not artificially assume a historic character they never had. Contemporary design maybe appropriate, and creativity is important. Old Dublin has several buildings of recent date that are integrated successfully into the chazacter of the district. Integrating a successful building design into an existing context requires creativity. The most successful designs aze contemporary in chazacter. However, they take important design cues from what exists azound them: Building placement, scale, massing, architecture: • Placement and lot orientation: Old Dublin buildings typically aze free-standing but closely spaced along the street. Appropriate placement and orientation for a new structure will vary with the location, but the design should resemble the placement and orientation of adjacent structures. • Lot & Yard Space Requirements: Required side and rear yazd areas shall be a minimum of 0'-0". Total lot coverage may exceed 80%; however, the site must comply with all applicable code requirements. • Building Setbacks: Building setbacks shall be a minimum of 0'-0" from all property and rights-of- way lines. 3 • Scale and proportion: Scale refers to the size of a building in relation to that of a person. Old Dublin is distinctive in part because of its unusually intimate scale: nearly every building has a small, pedestrian scale that is inviting to people. Proportion is the relationship between a building facade's width and its height, and it has an impact upon the building's sense of scale a building with strongly vertical proportions will impart a different feel than one with a lower profile. Any new construction should be designed with a sense of scale appropriate to that of Old Dublin, with proportions carefully controlled. The most appropriate approach is to study existing buildings in the district and try to achieve similar proportions and sense of scale. This might, for example, require designing a building in a series of smaller masses rather than a single large form. • Height: Buildings in Old Dublin do not exceed two stories in height, with many only asingle- story. In designing a new building, adjacent building heights should be observed; in no case shall height exceed two stories. The height of a building shall be determined as provided by the Dublin Zoning Code. Materials, textures, and colors: New buildings should use traditional Old Dublin materials such as wood, brick and stone. All material and colors will be consistent with those approved for Old Dublin Town Center 1. This will help ensure that new buildings have an appearance and a visual texture compatible with what already exists. Color, too, should be selected according to an historic color palette and should be compatible with the color(s) of the new building's materials. • Massin for Y~, and roof sha,~es: Massing refers to how the basic shapes of buildings fit together. Most Old Dublin buildings have fairly simple massing, generally plain rectangular shapes used either singly or as intersecting blocks. Some buildings from the later Vctorian period have more complex massing consisting of multiple overlapping blocks. Appropriate new building designs should use massing similar to that in adjacent and nearby buildings. Form grows out of massing and refers to the kinds of massing typical of various architectural styles or building types. Federal style buildings, for example, are almost always rectangular in form, while gabled ell structures have an L shape. Form can be affected by later additions. As with massing, new buildings should e employ what is typical of Old Dublin. The roof line of a new building should incorporate features seen throughout Old Dublin. Cross gables, intersecting gables, shed roofs, and hip roofs provide variety, and there are some examples of a modified gable known as a hip roof. New building designs should employ roof shapes such as these. • Rhythm of onenin~s: In any architectural style or building type, door and window openings have certain patterns. The spacing of these openings in a building wall is known as rhythm. Designs for new buildings should employ rhythms of openings similar to those in adjacent and nearby buildings. 4 • General design: The design of the building must utilize a variety of materials, finishes and colors, and appear to be storefronts constructed over a number of years. The facade must be "stepped", versus long expanses of flat walls, so as to provide visual interest. All exterior building and site modifications must receive ARB approval. Any future building additions or alterations are also subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Commission under the PUD provisions of the Code. Landscaping Landscaping shall conform to the Dublin Zoning Codes and as generally presented on the enclosed landscape plan. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. Only fencing associated with outdoor seating (decorative fencing), screening of adjacent residential lots, and the screening of mechanical units and dumpsters is permitted, and must receive approval from the ARB. • A tree preservation,~rotection, and removal plan shall be developed in conjunction with City staff . and a certified arborist. The plan will designate caliper replacement required. Owner will comply with the tree Preservation Ordinance except as waived by Council due to the amount of existing trees that are required to be removed in order to develop both the building and parking lot. Signage • All signs on the site will have a similar character. All signs must comply with the Dublin Sign Code and the Old Dublin Sign Guidelines and shall be consistent with the signange approved for Old Dublin Town Center 1 as attached. Signage may not be internally illuminated or electrically back-lighted. The comprehensive sign package must be approved by the ARB. Once the package is approved, individual tenant signs must comply with that package and may receive final approval from the City planning staff administrative review. Parking • Anew parking lot will be constructed within the Old Dublin Town Center 2 Subarea 2 _ development. This new parking lot will be accessible from Franklin Street and Mill Lane/West Alley and will incorporate a redevelopment of Sells Alley through the parking area. The new parking lot will be made available for the general public associated with Old Dublin use with an understanding that the total parking count is maintained as associated with the parking space requirements of this project. • Any residential use will require sufficient designated parking to be provided. • Any trees that are removed during construction of the new parking area must be replaced by the developer of the Old Dublin Town Center 2 in compliance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. (See Landscaping section of this text.) 5 • Site lighting and poles will match those in the municipal pazking lot developed as part of Old Dublin Town Center 1 at the Southwest comer of West Bridge and South High Streets location. All decorative building-mounted light fixtures must be approved by the ARB. All site lighting shall meet the provisions of the Dublin Lighting Guidelines. • Buyer agrees to grant Seller a perpetual non-exclusive parking easement, which shall run with the land, to pazk on the Pazking Lotto be developed by Buyer on Parcel 2, as well as a perpetual non exclusive pazking easement on that portion of Parcel 1 which will be pazking for the office building to be built on Pazcel 1. Utilities • All new on-site utilities shall be placed underground; all utility connections shall be to the reaz of the building(s); and all heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning equipment shall be effectively screened form view as required by the Zoning Code. Waste • All waste materials shall be containerized and effectively screened from view as required by Zoning Code. Final Revision: l0-5-C~ cepted By Date pplicant) 6 I ' - - 16 MAX o x ~ ~ T~ 6.6" MAX ~ 1" N .n ~ m i _ ~_O Z ~ a J i ~3 - w N y I ~ a ~ ~ z ~ a, • ~ i w~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ N; n', ~ a~ ~ _ ~ _ - ~ ~ ~0 0 ~~o ~ n 2T' 4" 18.5" O - p Z Z Z m ~ ~ - • ~ ~ o O ~ O < ~ m a ~ o ° y0 C 2 Z CA z y ~ f f ~ D • ~ ~ D z < ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ - o rn Z ~ 11 i z ~ o ~ a ~ 2 ~ z ~ - O ~ 1 D m I rn ' O Z ~o~ • • ~ • • • • ~ • • • • • • • NmD m D m ~ ~ D~ C7 Z~z Xmz ~ t Dca ~Dm~-" ~ ~ o D~ n z~z DDm°-' (A m~tmn ~ ~ , ~ v o mz ~ =na Day oo~~m~ =~°gz (~D ~ ~ ~z O =OD i~~z (~D Z c (D Z~= m ~O ~ OOr zmr pzZ G7 m 2 m O O r O ~ ~ fA m ° ZC ~ ~c °z rcncD~ m~OZ n ° zc fn ~z~ mSOz m2 m m QO u m ~D imp L~nO ~ccn~~ OZ°m ~ ~ Imo mD ~ ~m0 ooO°r ~ as T ..~i ~ ~ = L7 ~ mrr. (Q (~nZ DcZ~pC~ D C°~~ L~ m~ (Q ~Z ~Zp~ In r-5 ~O ~ O ~ z II ~ Z u czi~ II Zpz~ m~~° ~ pr r~~r z u ~ z Icn m~oo~ ~ m ~ ° ° m W Z(n 2~~ °rL~m ° DO ° T.- ° DZ II m D r 70 ~ `•"Z SOD mrDII iD=~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ cnZ 1D=~ fA ~ ~ a~ mD n cng~ °„~i ~znr C_n D u ~ ~znm (_n D m ,i O m D W z cn in ° cn m (Q 'n O ~ ° cn m (Q 'D(J)p ~ -~i II O ~ ~ =(n r~ ffznrIDr~~ ~2<D ~ ° ~ ~ °m0 -D ~ ODD ~ m ° ° -r--ID Dn~cn_ mtnOm ~ ° ~ -r-ID m~nm a mmm ~ n m D tAr wD S~~cn ~~~p m ~ cnm ~ ~ ° ~ mC n~~m~m~= ° ~ mc~m~? ~~o ~l D ZO ~ ~~~r ~ z0 D°~~ ~ ~ ° m z~ m ~~0 rR~m m rsz°~ OD N D~ Z S7D Z r r? O r O AO'R1p ~LO~L11~ aais v~ Lvara 1~~ a 7~ ~ ~71N ~Ri y w w S 1~ ~7 l/ !7 V v ....r.....,.. . Q Z 2~~L~11i~ 11IMO,L 11lIT~I1Q Q'IO . • r~ ,~v ~..r ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a f C W ~ ~ v~ u„ ICI la ~a,'I', I~ IL ~ C~~ - ~ ~ g ~ I f ~ - - ~ a III i ~ I ~ ~J l3 ~ ~ ~ jl q UJC=1~ ~ ~~M ~ i~', ° lJ-1 ~ ~ ~ o d i _ _o ~ w w ~ a o ~ m " III ~ I ~ ~ ~ _ n ~ Z~ QTY ~ ~ a ~3 ~ ~ ~ D a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ g ~ G~~ - - i~ ~ I I I I III i t ~ i o ~1 j - - n~ ~ o~ - ~ fi ~ - ~ ~ I ~ III~~~ ~ ~ i s ~ ~ ~ III I ~ r ~ ~ ~ moo' k Ion ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w o .~~I ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti Q ~ ~I iIllj;lll~l I ~ Y ~ ~ 8 I t j e d ~ L ~ ~ ~ :~,w ~ IIIIII z g q S ~ ~ I f-- w a ,Ililll I I~ t w 4 N ~ } w b O 4 ~ E ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ L - ~ ~ 4 II ~ II I! I III 1 I I - S a ~ ~ b z~ i ~ - • ~ F ~ Wry _ d 1~~ ~ ?I~OwCEN ~ooooc ~ L~oarr wa.~.~.w 1~~ ~ 7~ ~lA TRIM MIL ~ w ~..w.• S1~~71 /H~b/6~ " Z a31N3~ NMOl NI~BfIa a~0 ..n ti? ~mao ~w s Z ~ o v 8 o Z Ww 00 w o ~ 0 - - Q--- oo J J to N ~ ~ a Ylf v _ L ~ ~4 10000( SII L~aY1 wwws.~ . w S1~~1 /H~b {r N " Z ~31N3~ NMOl NI~Bfta a~0 Z S J Q Z po Q U W ~ ~ o z ~ m ~ V ~illllll 3 ~ tllllll~ 1111111; ~ ~ ry ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 f'!'T~1~ Q ~b • fir. r, ~ ~k ~ ap t1~N moot a Lvvrd NA 7wri NB = S 1 ~ ~ l / H ~ b/ 6~ r " Z d31N30 NMOl NilBfla al0 r• rte. w ' • Z S o F~ _~I o Z a V LD IIIIIIII III IIIIIIiIII ~IIIIIIIIIII i IIIIIIIIIIII TI ~ n~ Ilil ILL I 66 Q I o swrr as •~irio ~usroacw~s azo~o w ~ s•....,n... avor ni~rs •~t ^ t s.~ r..~ . ~ ? v S 1~~ 1 / H~ b d ...w.....~.. z x~.rnr~~ ~rn~os ~rr7gnQ ~o ~ - . • ~_t o, ' e~ yi z R = ~ g ~ Z ~ a o ry .orrs ,y, c ~ .nltup tr a N R f 1 ]l ~ ~ ~ - O 5 ^ ~ b 1` w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ $ ~ s R ~ z i ,I y .OJY01 ' r .It.ri:er s ~~i WWI d I ~ 1 1, Q§ + Y ~ ~ I a = F y l g' ry j W N 7 ].t1.Z~.RYw G y + - ~ X ® N L ' ~ ~ s a ~ v ~ >r ~ g~~ E_ _ : B ~ ~ i s ~ : g~--~-- ~ ; ~ m~ go ~ ~ y a ~ e ~ i ~ - B T 7JNH IGI>(.i ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ j -----------------09 --=---~--r--- .g I i 7 ~ ~s ~~rzrs .ts~x i ~ _ _ _ - - - ~ - - - ~ s ~ W it € g SEX:Yw. Sw X$$X _ ~ =5 ~ e ¢e: as ga ttz orce¢pgb¢a¢¢a o:azecco$~ns ~ a ~ ~;~03~ ~ ~ ~ a ___~gzgaz°_~~a°iz°~a'aci°c'£~~z_zg~~za..a£zc € _ .c k w ~ _ R w s 'g ~ - o : 3 O ~~~~~~~~a~~~a~~~~~~~~~~.~~~ --~u_ iii ~~~z(' ~ ~ ~ ~ a '~S_5g$c~~u~~ wee =tw_ 37c#~' i€%~ 7 GO 1 4 _PLL _LL u'_at7 ~«R e~ M ; P +VC 4 i y r,b b :r __L~', s. _..L. L_3~~=~{._.,M~~ ~ ~ !_.Si a ~ ~ i u ~ . ~ be ~F sa_ .E ~ ~~a g:~5E8~~YEB Sy8 ~ ciua ~V u_uZ< 3,x__zzzzxxxxx~__ xx x~ss~a rrt n .2 - O ~ - -------~-p------ ¢¢-CC- Mp~O~w ~~~~I~~b~ ~a NnF1iNNInV HFiM Nwln . s ~ - i J a W ~ ~ o a Z r t P;„ d ~ 0. ~ !~---.r ~ r~, r J W Z~~ O~Law~ w ~ ~ ~'l~ ~ a ~ _ a + ~uo~_~_ ~ z ea'a 4a 4j ~ i. g m t a a a ~ ~ ~ R! ~ ~i 0 0 0 0 0_ _ ~ t~ li u. ~ ~ ~ N LL rtl ctp~ N tlml t(1Utl7 t~ ~ (_V ui ~ Ki ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ^ ~ r ~ci m - m "r _ n m `c0 ~ r ~ mmUU n u-~ ~ c ,8 ~ nd - ~ $ $ Q ~ L r.~^ ~1 Y ~ E ~ jl v ~~jg yx 3 3 6 ~L 4 ~ tY* u u o o O~ t, ~ L J ~ a~~ V/ ~ a N~ ~ ~ F- u (n ~u~ ~ O W V c U W p ~ F- cn - ~ + = Q U ~ ~ ~ ~ W z Q ? W Q a. Z ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Z U z ~ W W t1~ z~ W V z Z ~ Z ~n ~ t~ Q W J~ ~ w z W J ~ ~ W Q J W~. mz Vz Z W W a z m~ Z 1= ~ ~ W ~ V ~ U = z ~ ! ~ ~ Q z 0 0c W ~ > ~ =a C~~ oo~ ~ n tl~v F. ~ ~ _ w~~*.~.. wp oM 7HN ~~N .wrs pl LTaa~u ~.w. wow ~ sic r• rrw w Z ~.I.AI~~ 11tMO.L 11iI7SI1Q Q'IO (n . ~ r.~+w~i ~ ~ ,:env ww~ ~t i g ! ~ i i a o .a'ilb ,pGCI,~ M ~ w '~81 O V/ . O N m g - - N O .001101 w ,Kacaf s 7057 g ~ ~ s3 ds v ~ ~ 63 dS 5 - - -.^;~J ~ f 3 ,i4ikM M i y[a i m KrJ m m m V 2 r D n o~ § ~ 57~' ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~w ~ ~ zo ° ~p = a s a~ ~ w s i~ .$Q~o_ O~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ - V W Z~ 1 11 11 I~ ~ N ? 44 sQ yY YYY ~9 ~lS~y ~ ~ ed oo- ya y 1 1 1 1 1 ~~IJ Ifl IL it IL IL ~ 0.1110. ~f tl)N OiN ~ o-~ _ o ~°~Y~~ F~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ - : 1 _ ~ • y...,. IILYYYL`?N aox ~w w r a~ ww w sioc~ OaD 'K~nO r~ p.r~ s 1~ OrGtl 111R~Mi •Kt S 1~~ 1 / H~ b d ~ Z ?I~.LI'rI~~ ItIMO.L 1~II'ISI1Q Q70 Y ~ ~ Z ~c~ r s ~ ~ 3~ ~ S f ~ ~ ors ° o R4 ~ ' i ~a ~h _ ~ ~ ~I - I ~~~c~ Z i ~ ~ ~ o R ! ~.fc~s{ ! ~ Y v S~~ W Z I ~ ="I ~~a ~ S ff~ ~ 1. Q ~ ~c Z ~~W ffff 4 l' s ~ Y~ ~r~ ~ 0 5 ~ y~ 3~ ~ 99 a .t l(~]) o _ ~ ~ o z ~ ~ s ~ ~ .r ~ I ~ I i I ~ I i i ~ Y a . _ . i. x ~ ~ ~ ~QF' ~ a~, ~.h W / ~ u I 5~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ r ~ • _ i I I ! 1. ~ _ ~ ~p\~' n ® _ ~ a ~ - i ~ . . ] ro- J ~ ~4 ` I d - r r .I ~ ~ is o j I I I ~ S I r tl Y~ W -t ~i oz 1,~ ~ ~NI GO i I~i ~d ~~_a~ W I I a ! ! .C~it~ ti i , _ - j r- tK ~ I i a..` q` i i i I I I I ! g I I~ v~ ~ I j i U i ~ ~ I I 1 i ' i ~ I ~DNf~6~x3 I ~ i I i I _ I j ~ I i' I` V i l11 ~ i I I j i I i , 09 .~YS'~XdS ~ 3TI~QI?I& .rrS3i/( l ~ 'i i i 11~~ i d I =~el~s ml III I i I ~ I N ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ ~TIfI~I3tI.E~~~~IY6LTEILI.T_l'FfI Y ~ s ~ ~ "I I Il~ Ip ~`il1 ~ ff ~'~I~ - b WS- N ~DV~A A 7 l~Y s I ead ! ~ ~ e~i Pplg ~ 3 ~ 2t t 1 IE f .I I gN~ F ICI Zi ~Iil~ 'k ~~I j'e1Sl~r~ily ~ ~[i~Jeeel~~ ~~5[51II `I(~ ~ C Cp c1~ ~ ~I ili~~;`~.~E Iyy,d~~~I ~ ~ C~v_I ~ I € i H I~~, I 'i' i II II 3 ~ ~ ' I I i . Z, I I I ~ I , I I ( , - ~ ~ a