Loading...
51-00 Ordinance _ _ _ . .y._.~ , RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043 Ordinance No....51.-0Q. _ Passed AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR 25.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUBLIN ROAD AND TUTTLE ROAD, FROM: R-1, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, To: PLR, PLANNED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LLEWELLYN FARMS SOUTH - WUERTZ PROPERTY - 4189 TUTTLE ROAD -CASE FILE NO.00-024Z). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. r~- Passed this S~-day of , 2001. Ma - residing Officer Attest: Clerk of ouncil Sponsor: Planning Division , I .hereby certify that copies of this Ordinonce/Resolufion were posted the City of Dublin in accordonce with Section T31.2S of the Ohie Revised • a ~ ~ ark Council, Duhlin. Ohin ~F.. May 21, 2001 Council Meeting: ORDINANCE #51-00 - LLEWELLYN FARMS SOUTH Council by motion amended the Planning_and ZOninE Conditions as follows; Condition #1 amended to read: 1. That the text indicate the applicant is not required to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road or Tuttle Road, and that it be noted on the preliminary plat; and Condition #3 amended to read: 3. That a portion of the "No Disturb Zone" along the southern tree line be revised to a "No Build Zone," and that the applicant commit to provide a pedestrian connection to the Monahan subdivision along the southern property line if the opportunity arises, subject to staff approval, and if between now and preliminary plat stage, a connection can be identified with Monahan Estates as a north-south connector for a bikeway or pedestrian way, that this connection will be shown on the preliminary plat Council by separate motion approved the sidewalk waiver as per Condition #4 and the street tree waiver for Tuttle Road as per Condition #8. Division of Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road -Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236 Phone: 614-761-6550 -Fax: 614-761-6566 Me m o CITY OF DUBLIN TO: City Council ~%~t C~ FROM: `~bara M. Clarke, Planning Director RE: Ordinance 51-00 -Llewellyn Farms South DATE: May 17, 2001 This rezoning involves several additional items. They include a partial sidewalk waiver, a partial street tree waiver, and consideration of a left turn stacking lane from Dublin Road into this new neighborhood. An attached letter from Charles Driscoll to Mr. Kindra requests approval of the waivers in conjunction with the Llewellyn Farms South rezoning. • Sidewalk waiver: A sidewalk or bikepath is proposed everywhere except along the ' northeast side of Belfield Drive. This will permit a broad, uninterrupted view into the park from the interior of the subdivision. Staff endorses this limited waiver. • Street tree waiver: Generally, street trees are added along all street frontages. In this case, Tuttle Road already has a fairly solid tree row in place. The developer is proposing to augment it where needED and to extend it along the full length. Staff believes this is appropriate in this circumstance. • Left turn lane: The attached memo from Paul Hammersmith (May 17, 2001) addresses this issue. In short, staff believes installing a left turn lane on Dublin Road is consistent with City practice and public safety goals, and should be implemented. The Commission discussed this and reached the opposite conclusion. (Please note, a left turn lane on Tuttle Road is included in the developer's plans already.) SUQMITTEO TO COUNCIL ~ ~ ~ FOR MEETING ON 2 ~ Division of Engineering 5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236 Memo Phone: 614-410-4600 • Fax: 614-761-6506 CITY OF DUBLIN To: Carson Combs, Planner From: Paul A. Hammersmith, P.E. Assistant City Engineer -Development Date: May 17, 2001 Re: Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) Rezoning Application 00-0242 Left Turn Lane on Dublin Road At their March 1, 2001 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the above referenced rezoning application for Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property). As you know, the staff recommendation included a condition "that the text indicate the responsibility of the applicant to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road". This condition is consistent with the long-standing practice requiring an applicant install left turn lanes on the existing two-lane roadway at any access point to their proposed development. This policy is not based on a left turn lane warrant. It was established solely to preserve the capacity of the two-lane road, enhance safety, and provide congestion mitigation on the existing roadway. The Commission's approved motion for this rezoning included an amended condition with regard to the left turn lane on Dublin Road "that the text indicate the applicant is not required to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road, and that it be noted on the preliminary plat" . As the record reflects, I expressed my concern to the Commission that their amended condition was in conflict with the established practice. Additionally, I strongly recommend against placing a note on the preliminary plat, an action serving only to prevent. City Council from addressing traffic concerns in the future. Since the development of the present Llewellyn Farms, no new development has occurred along Dublin Road south of the Historic Business District, and as a result, no left turn lanes have been installed on this portion' of Dublin Road. However, numerous left turn lanes are located on Dublin Road north of the Historic Business District, and were typically installed in association with new development. These locations include the intersections of Killilea Drive, Chaddington Drive and Browning Court, Brandonway Drive and Bellaire Avenue, Ashford Road and Amberleigh Way, Memorial Drive, and Reserve Drive. In general, all other developments along existing two-lane roadways have been required to install left turn lanes in a similar manner. City Council is to consider this rezoning application at their upcoming May 21, 2001 meeting. On behalf of Balibir S. Kindra, P.E., City Engineer, I wish to reaffirm the recommendation of the Engineering Division that the applicant be responsible for the installation of a left turn lane on Dublin Road, consistent with the established practice. This installation is essential to preserve the capacity of the road. Therefore, the staff recommendation as presented to City Council should include the condition as was originally recommended by staff to the Planning Commission. Furthermore, no note should be placed on the preliminary plat. cc: Balbir S. Kindra, P.E., Director of Engineering/City Engineer Bobbie M. Clarke, Director of Planning _..n _ E~CHIBIT _ c' o LONGVIEII ~ ~ ~x r 1[EHOp.. _ ~ ~ L d CRANDVIEIf 1 $ _"'~G A ~i' ~ I 'L ~ 'TWP ~ / ~ GRL~ • , . i `b"~, ~ i C c ~ ~ t ~ HAYI(AE~R x , ~bN a =--~iTE ~ D R \ ~i f;~s oo 1 - - , ~ ~ CT ~ ~ ~ < ~ ` 1 ~ ~ ~ LB,,1, IDE ~ t a 1 S' ~ P _ e b~ ~ 1 1 4~ ~ ~ '~C CEN~R AVE BEL.F~ CT 1 1 ~ ~ ~ a .rarrs.E Rn i CRO ~G E q. I 1 ~ I ~ CRS NG I_ . - - ~ , ~ MAl- i l G 1 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ,m~ \ ` CASE RD ~'~'NON KAY ~ v ~o ? \ p~DR ~ rob ~ 1 C[~LU MBUS ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ b .tpEti R~ ~ ~ BET7iEL ~ ~ ~ ~b ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ l 00-0242 Rezoning Application Wuertz Property ~~~m~ _ _ ~ ,rte:- ~ ~ ~ _ I ~ LC i ~ ~ B ~ t I e -1 i - _ Q I _ - - F' R-4 - o 3~~ . r PUD ~~o ~ o TWP ~ / ~ EG SO ~ O R i ~ S C ~ ~ OLR ~ a ~ _ \ p PU a ~ P ~ i ~ i D ~ ~I v _ t L :t~~^-r~ ~I 1 ~ ~ R-1 ' ~ i q',' ro S t U: { x ~ ~ ~ - ~ S ~ ® i) ~ 00-0242 ~U ~ b I Rezoning Application . ~ ~ Wuertz Property b 1 - _ _ ~ _ _ .~A. EXHIBIT <<~, ; _ a 3 - (Co~f~~ S-~clior. i53.~34) 2 ; D lln C ~A~O': f''~.,4 !+ia ~f ~~:'t3e v - 3--Z.d -dy ;+r ~~a-r -.i.~.. set r i ..n~. l! D o ~ oc:~0 n ~ Fax 61~i 1 ~i3°•.i t~•,~~ ivC.iUa::~,c ~L.S?i. a,..,y - - _ e .___s_ s F-9' , , ,_c,: i. r!. ~ A; p'i~,;ticn pia Pr<7_ D ~ << ?,r!ion: } I ~ s _ - ~ C:'til:a _ .~:.i.~h NC NOTA,iI!ZEG ai' PL!C.^,T1G~iS - I'LI::\~;:!'r::. - A'r1D T}iiFT~F;d ('S, COPIES OF Tl-iE O:;iGlti~^-,L APPLICATIC;~ and C..=C TI TY!=c OF f.~~~_.,A?!CN -:site Pion, ~;:r,;i;:n 13.0~~) %'r• in:ic-::rrf ~,~v,.fca;~~:~n! Plan ~Ccd~, Se: -.,;;r; 153.C_ _ ~ 'I i E I 25.8 (1, !~ir,l~, P.i:;c~~~~o: 273-001719 _ I,;~, _ --I ' ~ 4189 Tuttle Road ; -----I it SW corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road _ - - _ I South of Tuttle Road;_West of Dublin P~oad I I~r _ Dublin and Tuttle Roads r , . 0 feet P~. ~ 11 ' ~ "°I~ Single Family Residence/Agricultural; Activities i JAN - 9 2001 Single Family Detached Homes ~ _~1 ~ I ~ t r _ _ _ _ Current or Existing Zcning District: ~ Requested Zcning District: I`Jo. cf Acres tc be Rezoned: R-1 PLR ! 25.8 ; i ! STATEML-NT: -1~ ~ State briefly he~.v the ! c, ~~._d ~en'^g and develc-^,~~^' r~~4a+~~ ±o the existing and _..`:_.I fu,ure land use character of 4he vicinity. We propose a single family project with extensive greenspace. We feel this use ~ will blend well with the homes on 3 sides of the property and the elementary school on the west side. I ; M~''" ~ ~ I STATEMENT: Y I State briefly how the prcpesed zoning and deve!cpment relates to the Dublin Community Plan. ~ i The Community Plan calls fora residential use for this property with a density ~I of 1 to 2 units per acre. This proposed zoning requests 1.5 units per acre. ~ ~i ~ II I I I ~ _ - _ - - - 'I I a~~`~IC 5 a~~ ~~,Ar ~I ~i 1~; li ,n :r ~ _ :r,r t r; tee ' •rved by the City Council .,ia in ' : ' _,t h c i') Y=~ ? „O ,I it - - - I 1 I ~ i i ~1 ~ I!= a PL.- i~0 DISTRICT IS RE ~tJF~TLD. IS C02.1POSITE OR PR~L!^.1fN ;?Y °1_AN 1 i ~ :F!i sJ? `f ~ rX i i ~r A t LA` f:E C C.!~',T ~r:T IS R" .~1~~ ~T~D 'S PROPOSCD GL=`?ELvi'!'. t T= T ~ i'.-~a r ~ v7 . 'l l ~ ~rl ~I Vii- i,.•rf, + i I~,~ ~ -or ~•d i ,i ,i::I:; cr! ~ _ 1~,3r1n(::) ~ L_V ~ - r. L_,QJ t~rf:!:IRC ~i NT;i: ~ ~I 11 11SF_Ta0!=r~L'.~;;~ t-1 SCAM ( 'gat r.'~i TI!:aJ 1 X:;(i")SSiOllr:u. v(yi`j „~i l i I i,, + ~ 1 I ~r n~f . I rai ~i r : i~ ! n ~~n,i ~~1 I ,i ~J. .I ~ ~ : ~!i,!~,~.!ta~,~:.vi~•, ~ s ~ 1 rt r a g ~is~`I~~C~ rr~rr ~f. Size of the site in acres square Poet; ar~d ' y. ,',I. property lines, street rights-of-v?~_ ~erncnis, and oi.`.cr information related to iccaticn of the proposed boundaries. ~ I~ 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THA'; 11" X 17") u II , COUP iP ~"vi Ji=RSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS KHAN 8~/" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 15' X 2G°) ~LShov,in Conti uous rc er owners within 500 feet from ths~ erim~ter of the area to be rezoned. CG~!TIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS _ List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet frcm the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to he in accordance with the Count`j Auditcr~ ~`j current tax list. (Use additional shEets as necessary.) Labels formatted fcr Avery 5160 may be submitted as !abets cr on a computer disk. I~ PFiOFc=RTY O~`JNER (not ^Acrtgage Company or Ta;c S~r:~icc) NIAILIIJG ADDRESS ~ CITY/STATE.rL'P CCDr_ i i i j~ See attached list. ~ ~ ~ 'IJ ~ i iI 1) i i, :I ,i _ ' -i i l I I ji i~ ,I ;I ~ ~I Ii j 'I I ~ I i i - i - i a I ~j - -1 I - ~1 i - ~U ~a'~~ !I ,j I I~ta i:,. _ ~ ~ _ ~f~~-'lt3i ~ ii~ri ~ STATL- OF nhi n i I~ COUNTY OF Frankl i n ' I, Charles DT1SCO11 _ the applicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. Tro i~ ~tcrmaiion ecn a i ~°d ii i tnis applicaticr, a:~,acned ext~,~~ils and c;her infcrmation submitted is complete ~ and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and o~fet ~I Signature of Applicant or Date: authorized Representative: ~ ~ ~ j I Sub;,cribed and sworn to before me this ~ day of •ti~ .~i~{ i' `1' ~ 7~ ~ Nc!ary Public o~~t~"' ~,.J ~ / ~ I4 ~ ;~~~~~~~9< ~ KENDRA M. GILGER = Notary PubNc, State of OMo ~y,` 9~~~ My GAmrtNssia~t F~xpires 10-25-05 N~~~n~Np~N V, v l ~ ~ ~i i ~ , _ ?'!~/'K ~ `g~a ~ 3~ E~rsrr n ~ Cx~t ~l~T ~r !'~~9 TO DEED FROM PAULII~IE WUER1~ Smeared iu the terry of Dubliq Frankfm County. Ohio. 7' Z Heiag a pact of Sutvry Na 241E, Va8ioia Miirtacy Lands, being more desaibed u fdtaws; Begi>mmg at a tatTcuad aprlca atba center of the Hilfued and DubGa Read adtece ia0erseds rho eauo~r!ma of Twtte Rid; thence with the curter 1'me ot'Ilude Road, which is abo aoctti live of Savoy Na ?A18 atxrth 78' SS West 1992.5 feet m a point, which is the nactheast of a suc tie tract doodad LQ Edward >L Yeager, and rococded in Deed Book Na. i44, page 194 Recoedea's O6oa, Ftss~n County, Ohiq thence with tLa eaat 6ne of said act aue trail sottth I4' East 998.7 fad to the aoutheast corner of said sot oar trod (pasdag as iron pipe at 30 feetk North 78' SC Fast 18382 Sod LD a point in the center Goo of Iidtiard and Dublin Road; !hence the oco<er Gae of sand Road North S' 35' West 1001 feet to the plane of beginning, wog .826 oars, more ac Ian. E7C(~PTII'1G Tf3ERFFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PR Begaaiog at a paart in the Deafer Gae of'llmla Rod loca0od at the aorihwest of above tneahoned 48.58 acre track theaca wah the west Gae of said 48.58 oar tract; South I ' 26' East, 997.75 €xt /v as iron pipe (passing as nun pipe at 34 fixt); thence with the eocrfh )tae acid 48.58 acre tract, Notch 78' and 54; East 262.4 feet m m iron pipe; thence North I4' 2S areal, 997.68 f«t to a paint in the omter line of Tuttle Road (passing as iron pipe at 981.68 feet with the Beater Tme ofTbttte Road, South 78' S5' West, 2624 fed to the place ofbegiaomg, 6.0 aaea, more or kss, and being subject to ad legal highways. ALSO EXCEPTIIIG THEREFROM TIC FOLIAWIIVG DESCRIDID PRO TY: situate in tba State of Ohio, county of Fraatdrq VrTlage of DubGq being m Yngirtia ' MrT~ry Survey No. 2418 and being 12000 saes of the 31.826 sate tra4T of land convey to Pauline Wuertz, by deed of ttcard is Deed Book 3261, Page 673. atl c+ beictg to in the Recorder's Office, Ftaakfin Couatq, Oluq and bouodad and descrihed as fo8oaa: Heganiag at a tariroad sptYe set is ttx cmterGne of Tuttle Road at the north comer of rho 6.000 sat tcad canveyod to Steghm G aad Matgarot V. Nelson, by decd of in OfEc~sl Recall 04909016, said sp0ce also being the aotthwateriy comer of said Pauline Wuertz 1.826 acre thence North 78° SS OU" Easy along said amteriiae of Tuttle Road, a distance o 525.97 fed ~ to a railroad spike sek thence South 14' 26' 00' East (passing as iron pm ad at 30.05 feet), s distance 995.44 feet to as iron pun sdm the ~rtherly line of BALLYMEAD AT DUBLIN SECTION 1', the plat of same is of record in Plat Boak 60, Pages 46 and 47; thence South 78. 54' 00" West, atoog said northerly line of'BALLYMEAD DUBLIN SECTION 1', the northerly line of'BALLY1vtEAD AT DUBLIN SECTION 5', as the of same is of cocotd is Plat Boalc 63, Page 72 and ttte northerly line of 'DUBLIN CARRI HOMES SF.C7'IONS 1; 2 AND 3", u the plat of same is of record in Plat Book 65, Pagel I and 42, a dutsace of 525.96 feet to as iron pin found u the southeattedy cornet of Stephen G. Margaret V. Nelson 6.000 oar ~ thctce North 14' 26' 00' West, along the easterly 6me of add 6.000 aae tract an inoa pin at 965.54 foot), a distance of 995.59 foot to the place of begiar~g, lag 12_ aces, morn or less Copy 'the focrgoa~g deroaiptioa of 12.000 stets was prepared by Thomas D. Registered FII.~ Surveyor No. 5908, from a survey auuie on Aprr7 8, 1987. Z F E g 2 9 2000 C1~1( QF t111~!_!N ~X ~1,~ 17~ l ~ , WUERTZ NEIGHBORS -MAILING ADDRESSES Board of Education, Dublin Harold & Kathy Hanley 7030 Coffman Road 5521 Dublin Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Village of Dublin Norman Baker 5200 Emerald Pazkway Marie Bosca Dublin, Ohio 43017 5474 Dublin Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 James & Linda Curl Joel McCuen 4806 Belfield Dr. 5456 Dublin Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Brian Miller Jean Jesinger 4801 Belfield Dr. 5436 Dublin Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Theodore Strouth Mary Denk 4614 Tuttle Road 5430 Dublin Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 C Gilbert Godshall, Jr. William Moloney Kelly Morton 5400 Dublin Rd. 4608 Tuttle Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Ralph & Bazbaza Warner Robert Hein 4602 Tuttle Road 5354 Dublin Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Eric & Melanie Schottenstein (4596 Tuttle Rd.) City of Columbus (Dublin Rd.) 110 Wilson Bridge Rd. #280 109 N Front St. Worthington, Ohio 43085 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Lowell & Patricia Culp Jerome & Margaret Nypaver 4586 Tuttle Road 5268 Bandon Ct. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43016 Stephen Ellman (4580 Tuttle Rd.) Anna Signore 2772 Powell Ave. 5267 Bandon Ct_ Bexley, Ohio 43209 Dublin, Ohio 43016 d Harry & Patncia McClure D Evan Hoo 4574 Tuttle Road Lee Durkin-Hood Dublin, Ohio 43017 F ~ 3 2 9 5259 Bandon Ct. Dublin, Ohio 43016 CITY OF DUQLIN t 3 . ~x~~~ rr,~~- j #00-0242 Dublin Board of Education Llewellyn Farms South/ 7030 Coffman Road City of Dublin Attn: Tim Hansley Wuertz Property Dublin, OH 43017 C Gilbert Godshall, Jr. James & Linda Curl Theodore Strouth Kelly Morton 4806 Belfield Drive 4614 Tuttle Road 4608 Tuttle Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 ,.,~lph & Barbara Warner Eric & Melanie Schottenstein Lowel & Patricia Culp 4602 Tuttle Road 110 Wilson Bridge Road #280 4586 Tuttle Road Dublin, OH 43017 Worthington, OH 43085 Dublin, OH 43017 Stephen Ellman Harry & Patricia McClure Harold & Kathy Hanley 2772 Powell Avenue 4574 Tuttle Road 5521 Dublin Road Bexley, OH 43209 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Norman Baker Marie Bosca Joel McCuen Jean Jesinger 5474 Dublin Road 5456 Dublin Road 5436 Dublin Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Mary Denk William Moloney Robert Hein 5430 Dublin, Road 5400 Dublin Road 5354 Dublin, Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 ty of Columbus !~r2tn: Mayor Coleman Jerome & Margaret Nypaver Anna Signore 109 North Front Street 5268 Bandon Court 5267 Bandon Court Columbus, OH 43215 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Evan Hood Stephen & Mary Petty Michael & Heather Isler Lee Durkin-Hood 5263 Whitegate Court 5255 Whitegate Court 5259 Bandon Court Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Michael & Keesha Mitchell Christopher & Janice Joos Kathleen Mahan 5247 Whitegate Court 5239 Whitegate Court 3746 Monahan Lane Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Wallace Campbell Jae & So Suk Anthony Sigler Catherine Cornelius 3762 Monahan Lane 5480 Dublin Road 3754 Monahan Lane Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 l,~ Valli Lukeman Bruce & Nancy Baer Richard & Cynthia Stratton 5336 Dublin Road 4792 Belfield Drive 4584 Bridle Path Lane Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Richard & Sally Dill George & Mary McCue Tamara MacLaren 4592 Bridle Path Lane 4598 Bridle Path Lane 4606 Bridle Path Lane Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Nancy Wetzel Lowell & Patricia Culp John & Margaret Weis 4612 Bridle Path Lane 4586 Tuttle road 4620 Bridle Path Lane Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Joshua Investment Company Richard & Linda Kof Ole & Pamela Bay 4596 Tuttle Road 4528 Bridle Path Lane 4634 Bridle Path Lane Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 David & Karen Brockway Douglas & Olga Borror Eileen Lynn 4675 Bridle Path Lane 5500 Dublin Road 5300 Dublin Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Clifford & Patricia Nunn Dennis & Judith Elliott Tracy & Sally Reed 5447 Aryshire Drive 5244 Bandon Court 5256 Bandon Court Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Mark & Laura Staker Yano Soboler & Alla Mayorov Dean & Shannon McBurney 5251 Bandon Court 2945 Leatherlips Trail 3739 Monahan Lane Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43016 John & Marcia Boatwright Robert & Arlene Kirschbaum Ronald & Carol Swart 3770 Monahan lane 3763 Monahan Lane 2643 River Oaks Drive Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Columbus, OH 43228 Richard & Patricia Ziska Richard & Linda Roth Jeffrey & Terri Frantz 5239 Bandon Court 5252 Whitegate Court 5260 Whitegate Court Dublin, OH 43016. Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 James & Kimberly Baich David & Beth Gentile Susan Riego De Dios 722 Monahan Lane 3751 Monahan Lane 3777 Monahan Lane Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43016 Z~3 Robert &~Patricia Bricker Brent & Holly Richert SOS CODISPOTI 5897 Connolly Court 4726 Bridle Path Court 5602 BRAESIDE Dublin, OH 43016 Dublin, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43016 NELSON CARY ROBERT HARRIS `Charles Driscoll 4629 BRIDLEPATH 4639 BRIDLE PATH The Edwards Land Company DUBLIN, OH 43016 DUBLIN, OH 43016 500 S. Front Street, Suite 770 Columbus, Ohio 43215 ational City Bank Richard & Linda Younkman o Gary Moreland 5884 Connolly Court i...55 E. Broad Street Dublin, OH 43016 Columbus, Ohio 43215 ~~3 The Edwards Land Company An Edwards Company 500 South Front Street • Suite 770 • Columbus, Ohio 43215 7b19 • (614) 241-2070 • FAX: (bl4) 241-2080 September 27, 2000 Mr. Carson Combs Planning Department City of Dublin 5800 Shier Rings Road Dubiin, Ghio 43G i o Dear Carson: Please accept this letter as authorization for Ben Hale to represent us in the Llewellyn Farms South rezoning. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, THE EDWARDS LAND COMPANY, LTD. Charles P. Driscoll President CPD: jmm ;~'1. ~~.~i r. i _ ~ ~ ~b _ JOSEPH ~ . TES'1~A FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR MAP..... AREA ' br.,_. DATE :._._APR 27 , 1999 _ - V' ~ ;K V. ~ r ~ ~ / ~WWY J V _ ~ - ` e r- - ~ ,4 1 I i ~ O I ~ ~o i I ` I ~ 5 + « ~y ~ o ~ ' r f . O' S. `l. I =5 ~ ~ _ ..DISCLAIMER SCALE t• 200 I cR+o TM /noD ~ Dr•Da•d fpr tM r~Ol a~tr w~v.ntory rithin the ea..ty. k :s comDid trorr, r.cord.d dNds. wnn~ surv.y Dols. Ond otlw Da~~ rOCOrds ofW data lh~rs of this map an roC~fi.a tfrot tM p~bfic RAY Crl~, infarrration source shook be evnaWtad for vKificotion of the information contoin~d Oll Nia ,~ry~ m county a74 tM mapping camponios acsurno ro byd rpgons~iili.s for tM in/ormotion t>~ 1S ~ f+yasa notify tM t rankfin wu"cy ta5 pivisiOn Of ony dkcrpancios. GI 1 N F E 3 2 9 2000 CITY QF DUBLIN LLEWELLYN FARMS SOUTH Edwards Land Company 25.8 Acres at the Intersection of Dublin and Tuttle Roads Apri19, 2001 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT Introduction The proposed site is the former Wuertz property located adjacent to the existing Dublin Board of Education property on the west, single family homes fronting on Dublin Road on the east, on the north by Lewellyn Farms Subdivision and south by the Monahan subdivision in the City of Columbus. It is presently agricultural land on flat ground with only a farmhouse and a few outbuildings. There are a number of other subdivisions and developments in the area, most notably the Monahan subdivision to the south of the target property, that have left this agricultural tract out of place. It is inevitable that this land will be developed at some point in the near future. With that in mind, the proposed single family development will meld easily into the surrounding communities, while not significantly adding traffic in the area. Our company has an option to purchase this site. Development Standards The current plan proposal features 38 single family homes on 25.83 acres, for a gross density of 1.47 du/ac. Homesites have a minimum width of 80' at the building setback line, and a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet. Required side yards on each lot will total 14' or more, with a minimum of 6' on each side. Required rear yards shall be at least 25'. The maximum height of any buildings on the lot shall be 35' as measured by Code. Building setbacks from the edge of dedicated road R.O.W. off Dublin Road shall be 90' and for Tuttle Road shall be 50'. All other setbacks from R.O.W. shall be a minimum of 25' and will vary, meeting all Code requirements. The rear 20' of all lots within the subdivision shall be covered by a No Build Zone to keep those areas free of obstructions including, but not limited to, drives and walks, buildings and outbuildings, basketball courts, other sports courts, sheds, fences, swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play structures, satellite dish antennae, etc. There will also be a 20' No Build Zone on the side yard of tots adjacent to public open space. Nothing herein shall prohibit over-lot grading and drainage facilities and utility lines and utility structures within said No Build Zones. Parks and Open Space The open space portions of the plan will comprise 5.65 acres, which is more than the 2.66 acres required by Dublin Code. The two proposed areas are 1.86 acres at the northwestern corner and a 3.79 acre park along Tuttle Road. These parks and open spaces will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a forced and funded homeowners association. Developer will repair barn windows and paint barn white prior to deeding to the City. Revised 4/09/2001 ; ~~~w. Landscaping and Tree Preservation The entrance on Tuttle Road shall be similar to the adjacent Llewellyn Farms entrance, with stone walls and landscaping. The Dublin Road entrance is the secondary entrance and will be identified by stone pillars and landscaping. All of these features will be maintained by the homeowners' association. Street trees for a street program shall be chosen from the following four species and shall be ~ placed an average of 45' on center: Maple, Ash, Linden and Locust. These trees shall be planted so that only one variety is used per street. Final approval for tree selection and placement shall be given by the City Forester. An alternative street tree plan in lieu of the formal street tree requirement will be installed along Tuttle Road to augment the existing natural treerow. Most of the trees on the site are located in two tree lines on the north and south sides. The south side tree line is intended to be totally preserved. A 15-25' No Disturb Zone will extend along the entire south boundary as shown on the site plan. The north tree line and stone remnants will be preserved except for portions required to be removed for street improvements, driveways and. utilities. Any trees removed will be replaced per the Dublin Tree Preservation Ordinance. Provision of Utilities Sanitary sewer at the southeast corner and water line along Tuttle Road shall be extended to the site from the current termini adjacent to the proposed development area. Surface drainage shall be handled in conjunction with detention basins within the open spaces at the corner of Tuttle and Dublin Road which will be constructed by the applicant with approval from the City of Dublin_ The surface drainage shall comply with all applicable requirements, with the main outlet under Dublin Road at Tuttle. Circulation and Access The attached rezoning plan shows the subdivision will be served by two access points off Tuttle Road and Dublin Road. A turn lane will be provided by the developer on Tuttle Road. No turn lane will be installed by the developer along Dublin Road. Four of the lots which front on Dublin Road will directly access the right-of--way via shared curbcuts. The Dublin Road lots which also front on Limestone Ridge Drive shall be restricted to curbcuts on Limestone Ridge Drive only. w... All internal rights-of--way shall be 50' with pavement width(s) of 28' back to back of curb. Cul- de-sacs will have aright-of--way of 110' diameter and have an 81' paved diameter. House setbacks on cul- de-sacs within the subdivision shall be calculated from curved radii of a bulb turn around rather than a boxed end. Any intersection improvements will be provided by developer and coordinated with the City of Dublin engineering staff. All rights-of--way will be dedicated according to the Thoroughfare Plan. Parking shall be restricted to one side of interior streets opposite fire hydrants. Sidewalks and bike paths will be provided in the following locations: Four foot wide concrete sidewalks will be installed according to all city standards on both sides of the streets within the subdivision to provide for pedestrian traffic. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk will be constructed along the Dublin Road frontage. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk shall connect Burnham Court to the school playground. Revised 4/09/2001 1 An eight foot wide asphalt bike path shall be installed from the subdivision entrance at Belfield Drive along Tuttle Road to connect to the Dublin school site and Llewellyn Farms Park. The eight foot wide asphalt path shall meander through the open space areas along Tuttle Road. No sidewalk will be installed along the north side of Belfield Drive, as indicated in the proposed zoning plan. Architecture Architecture styles, elevations and materials will be similar to Llewellyn Farms. The exterior of all homes shall be constructed of all natural materials including brick, stone, wood, stucco and/or hardiplank. All homes shall have dimensional asphalt shingles. All chimneys within the subdivision (either side or rear of the house) shall be constructed of brick, masonry or stucco. Similar elevations will not be allowed on nearby lots according to an approved diversity matrix. Fencin The applicant shall prohibit the use of chain link or metal fencing on any of the lots within this area through this zoning restriction and recorded deed restrictions. No fencing shall be installed forward of the building line of any lots and will follow code requirements. The developer shall provide a buffer plan showing either fencing or suitable landscaping between the lots and park/open space areas. Such fencing or landscaping shall be installed outside of the No Build Zone within proposed open space. S gna~e Ground signage will be cut limestone, located along Tuttle Road and Dublin Road and incorporated into landscaped entry features. Maximum permitted sign face along Tuttle Road shall be 24 square feet, and a maximum of 4 square feet along Dublin Road for proposed entry features. Project Phasing Upon completion of the zoning and obtaining of all plat approvals, utilities will be extended to the site. Construction shall commence thereafter to develop the subdivision starting from the Tuttle Road location working south. ~ Applicant /Representative Date Revised 4/09/2001 l., _ F Rfx~g / ~ _ J C \ o~.t.~.y ~ t. _ ~ ~ _ ~L_ - A i - cauue Azp6a1 Bik<P B1'ILC ~ 1 ~ H-0.5 Ac 's~J j A r w1rYY ~ - r ~ ~ y_I~ ' f ~ ~ Q(lIXl ~(I~C \ r' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 3.79 Ac. ~ ~ ~ r i k¢ rwran ~ btt~ ` eF~ ` ~ /J \ ~G~ ~ FEE ~ 1,15 1 t> CA I t ~ 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r\ i~ r\/ ' 1, ~ ~ I +J-1.86 Ac 1 i` ~ r ~ ~ ,r 1 .y---~-- ~ r + ~ _ ! CaK.erc Pads i~, 1 j-J _ ~ ~ 1 ; \ L' 1 / tr / f E 1 7 I;.~ { f F '-l r 1 ~ ~ r t 1 r ~ r ~ 61I?~ f'u 1 ~ .---ate i~': ~"~1 ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ r i L,~.b • q j 4'- aU0.NN 0.N i _ ~ ~~F~- _ '~-'~S ly 1 1' ~ rl _1 11 -r . _ 1 ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,i 1 ~ ~-71 r 1 ~ __l ~-1-~T. a'y~'_~ i 1 J I~ ~ ! r-i~~ -T- \ 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farnis South A D 'r W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N a-' F~ 1-+ t"'' f+ 1-+ a+ r ~D Oo O~ U A W N _ ~ ~O 00 V O~ N A W N i-+ O iD p0 ~I o~ U A W N N O ~G 00 J eT U1 A W N O- S T _ ~ _ ; J ~ \Y _ _ W w w w w W V' ~ tJ N N N N t~ tJ ~D OJ ~1 J A w N N N ~t O~ to A W W O N J Q~ ll~ .P W N O ~ 00 ~.t O~ U A Y N ~ ~ v. 00 ~O t,n .P W 1~ W "t: W W W W W w O tJ N N N N N N N~ a~- W~ O. ~ ll~ tJt ? W 00 v ~ lh 1~. to ' • N w m ~ ~ to i~ w N O ~ oo J O~ ~ ' w iJ ~ O O N W W W W W N tJ N N N tJ N N N N A t- A w N ~ w A t0 00 J O~ ~ ' N w U ~ ~ oo v U ~ A W N O ~O oo J ~ , ~ N W W w W N N N N N N N N N N N~ O~ ' A U N Q iD Oo v w O O~ O ~O 00 J O~ ll~ A w N O ~D 00 ~ ~ : " W N W N p N ~t J ~'t O N'~ w ~ h wP W W N W W W W O w W tJ W ,~wtboo 0000 w ~ ~ Wo w ~ w X w N _ _ 1 ~7 i:4 N _ ~\a-----_~/ ~ ` ~ ,mil . I~.. r N ~ ~ a rat t , / n ~ ! 1--=- Tom-- c-.K!,,_- _i. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 33 d? APR-17-2001 TUE 12:10 Ph1 FAX N0, P, 02/02 ~ ~c~.~vards I~ar~d Coxnpan~ iln Edxwrric (_om~n~y S00 South front Strccl • quite 770 • Columbus, Oltio 43215 7619 • (614) 241-2070 • FRX: (G14) ?.41-20R0 April 13, 2001 Mr. Balbir S. Kinds city rllb?llCCr (;ity of Dublin 5800 Shier 1Zings Bond lluUlin, Ohio 43017 17car 13albir: We request approval of the following waivers as part of our Llewellyn Farms Souih reioniug: 1. ~ sidewalk waiver on the north side of licllield Drive in the open space area. We propose the alternative sidewalUbike path as shown in the following drawing. 2. A street free waiver along'1'uttle Road. There is currelrtly a fairly nice tree line along "futile Road, which we propose to enhance as shown on the enclosed plan. We prefer that natural look along this road in front of the open space rather thus trees planted at regular intervals. 1'lcase Ict me know if you need any additional lnforlnation to process these waiver requests. } i...r Sincerely, T,n'WARUS I,ANll L MPANY C~h~•les 1'. Driscoll President ern: ~t~lr~ f:nclosures GC: G<<rson Combs ~ ~ ; , ~i o~ - a~~~ / 7 Ls l E _ a sl~~~ r , ' is LLEWELLYN FARMS SOUTH APR 2 5 200 Edwards Land Company . Q~,c~ 2.5.8 Acres at the Intersection of Dublin and Tuttle Roads ~~~ef~ April 9, 2001 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT ~~~~.;r~:.>. I Introduction The proposed site is the former Wuertz property located adjacent to the existing Dublin Board of Education property on the west, single family homes fronting on Dublin Road on the east, on the north by Lewellyn Farms Subdivision and south by the Monahan subdivision in the City of Columbus. It is presently agricultural land on flat ground with only a farmhouse and a few outbuildings. There are a number of other subdivisions and developments in the area, most notably the Monahan subdivision to the south of the target property, that have left this agricultural tract out of place. It is inevitable that this land will be developed at some point in the near future. With that in mind, the proposed single family development will meld easily into the surrounding communities, while not significantly adding traffic in the area. Our company has an option to purchase this site. Development Standards The current plan proposal features 38 single family homes on 25.83 acres, for a gross density of 1.47 du/ac. Homesites have a minimum width of 80' at the building setback line, and a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet. Required side yards on each lot will total 14' or more, with a minimum of 6' on each side. Required rear yards shall be at least 25'. The maximum height of any buildings on the lot shall be 35' as measured by Code. Building setbacks from the edge of dedicated road R.O.W. off Dublin Road shall be 90' and for Tuttle Road shall be 50'. All other setbacks from R.O.W. shall be a minimum of 25' and will vary, meeting all Code requirements. The rear 20' of all lots within the subdivision shall be covered by a No Build Zone to keep those areas free of obstructions including, but not limited to, drives and walks, buildings and outbuildings, basketball courts, other sports courts, sheds, fences, swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play structures, satellite dish antennae, etc. There will also be a 20' No Build Zone on the side yard of lots adjacent to public open space. Nothing herein shall prohibit over-lot grading and drainage facilities and utility lines and utility structures within said No Build Zones. Parks and Open Space The open space portions of the plan will comprise 5.65 acres, which is more than the 2.66 acres required by Dublin Code. The two proposed areas aze 1.86 acres at the northwestern corner and a 3.79 acre park along Tuttle Road. These parks and open spaces will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a forced and funded homeowners association. Developer will repair barn windows and paint barn white prior to deeding to the City. Revised 4/09/2001 Landscaping and Tree Preservation The entrance on Tuttle Road shall be similar to the adjacent Llewellyn Farms entrance, with stone walls and landscaping. The Dublin Road entrance is the secondary entrance and will be identified by stone pillars and landscaping. All of these features will be maintained by the homeowners' association. Street trees for a street program shall be chosen from the following four species and shall be placed an average of 45' on center: Maple, Ash, Linden and Locust. These trees shall be planted so that only one variety is used per street. Final approval for tree selection and placement shall be given by the City Forester. An alternative street tree plan in lieu of the formal street tree requirement will be installed along Tuttle Road to augment the existing natural treerow. Most of the trees on the site are located in two tree lines on the north and south sides. The south side tree line is intended to be totally preserved. A 15-25' No Disturb Zone will extend along the entire south boundary as shown on the site plan. The north tree line and stone remnants will be preserved except for portions required to be removed for street improvements, driveways and utilities. Any trees removed will be replaced per the Dublin Tree Preservation Ordinance. Provision of Utilities Sanitary sewer at the southeast corner and water line along Tuttle Road shall be extended to the site from the current termini adjacent to the proposed development area. Surface drainage shall be handled in conjunction with detention basins within the open spaces at the corner of Tuttle and Dublin Road which will be constructed by the applicant with approval from the City of Dublin. The surface drainage shall comply with all applicable requirements, with the main outlet under Dublin Road at Tuttle. Circulation and Access The attached rezoning plan shows the subdivision will be served by two access points off Tuttle Road and Dublin Road. A turn lane will be provided by the developer on Tuttle Road. No turn lane will be installed by the developer along Dublin Road. Four of the lots which front on Dublin Road will directly access the right-of--way via shared curbcuts. The Dublin Road lots which also front on Limestone Ridge Drive shall be restricted to curbcuts on Limestone Ridge Drive only. i All internal rights-of--way shall be 50' with pavement width(s) of 28' back to back of curb. Cul- de-sacs will have aright-of--way of 110' diameter and have an 81' paved diameter. House setbacks on cul- de-sacs within the subdivision shall be calculated from curved radii of a bulb turn around rather than a boxed end. Any intersection improvements will be provided by developer and coordinated with the City of Dublin engineering staff. All rights-of--way will be dedicated according to the Thoroughfare Plan. Parking shall be restricted to one side of interior streets opposite fire hydrants. Sidewalks and bike paths will be provided in the following locations: Four foot wide concrete sidewalks will be installed according to all city standards on both sides of the streets within the subdivision to provide for pedestrian traffic. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk will be constructed along the Dublin Road frontage. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk shall connect Burnham Court to the school playground. Revised 4/09/2001 r An eight foot wide asphalt bike path shall be installed from the subdivision entrance at Belfield Drive along Tuttle Road to connect to the Dublin school site and Llewellyn Farms Park. The eight foot wide asphalt path shall meander through the open space areas along Tuttle Road. No sidewalk will be installed along the north side of Belfield Drive, as indicated in the proposed zoning plan. Architecture Architecture styles, elevations and materials will be similar to Llewellyn Farms. The exterior of all homes shall be constructed of all natural materials including brick, stone, wood, stucco and/or hardiplank. All homes shall have dimensional asphalt shingles. All chimneys within the subdivision (either side or rear of the house) shall be constructed of brick, masonry or stucco. Similar elevations will not be allowed on nearby lots according to an approved diversity matrix. Fe crng The applicant shall prohibit the use of chain link or metal fencing on any of the lots within this area through this zoning restriction and recorded deed restrictions. No fencing shall be installed forward of the building line of any lots and will follow code requirements. The developer shall provide a buffer plan showing either fencing or suitable landscaping between the lots and park/open space areas. Such fencing or landscaping shall be installed outside of the No Build Zone within proposed open space. Si a e Ground signage will be cut limestone, located along Tuttle Road and Dublin Road and incorporated into landscaped entry features. Maximum permitted sign face along Tuttle Road shall be 24 square feet, and a maximum of 4 square feet along Dublin Road for proposed entry features. Project Phasing Upon completion of the zoning and obtaining of all plat approvals, utilities will be extended to the site. Construction shall commence thereafter to develop the subdivision starting from the Tuttle Road location working south. err iG~ ` . ~/O Applicant /Representative Date Revised 4/09/2001 r•¦~ _ _ I ' W W W W W W W W W W N N N tJ N N N N N N~~ t-+ ~ t-+ ~ f.+ a+ ~D oo O~ to A W tJ D r ~O qD V tT flt A W N F-+ O ~D 60 J tT U A W N F~+ O 1D 00 ~1 eT t/U A W ~ tJ r-+ O _ ~ C~ G W W W W W W~ ~ N N N N N iJ tJ a.-. ~O O~ ~t J A W N N tJ ~ J O~ ll1 A W w O N J O~ cn A w N O~ oo v O~ to A N O' to A w A w W W W W W W O N N N N N N N N. . . a- W r- ~O . . . . . W 00 ~l O~ U A U' N W t» J~ U A W N O ~O OC J Q~ l./1 ' W tJ O O tT V1 Cn A' W W W W W a-~ ~ tJ tJ N N N tJ N N N N .P ' N ~ A ~O W O~ U ' N W t1~ ~ ~ 00 ~l tT V1 A W N O \O oo J ~ A W ~ N W _ ~ W W w .w-. W N N N N N N N N N N N U W W I U ~ V' ~O oo v ' W O O~ O ~D oo J O~ t~ A w N O ~D oo w N W A N O N W W N N N N N ~l ~ W W~ p.r C ` w O N ~1 ~l ~O +O ~O ~O ~ O N ca w ~ ~ A w w N w w w w 0 w w N S ' .-wo00o OOOO ~--w' twn N W W N 1D O p{, W ~ X w N i ~ ~ - j~ . it ~ _-a--- Y ~ _ j 1 . ~ r-- , ~ t~- . ~ HISTORY 4F PREVIOUS LAYDUTlPLAN RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 i Held r)errmhrr 11 9(100 I ~ w~a~ i l~la r Kranstuber asked staff to pond. Mr 'ndra stated that the stand ds for civil engineering prac ce recommend an 8-foot wi th for a bikeway, and this h been codified in Dublin's o finances and Building C de. He offered to meet with r. Maurer on the site to ad ess his concerns. ~ ayor Kranstuber asked that ( gal and engineering staff me t with Mr. Maurer on site ithin the next week, and tha all options be explored to ad ress Mr. Maurer's concerns E ayor Kranstuber then prese ted Mr. Maurer with a gift p ckage of City merchandise i rr ecognition of his extensive articipation in the Council eting process over the past year. S ecial Reco nition/Proc mations Officer Bruce McKenna, .A.RE. Program, addressed ouncil, and thanked them f r their support in the propo tobacco possession law w ich will be considered by Council later on the age a. This has served as a won erful educational tool forth students, and all schools ere well represented in this ffort. He thanked Mrs. Rei er, St. Brigid elementary s ool teacher for her support ' this effort. The following students ere recognized for their p icipation: Maleah O'Neal, li Ristas, Nick Gamrath, mily Wittman, Karen Lom rdo, Kyle Henning, Alex C issis, 1 Leslie Bender, Chris Cocumeili, and Jenna Moo aw. The students were give i certificates of recogn' 'on and a Dublin ballcap. Ms. Chinnici-Zuerc r commented that Council ill tonight introduce and co ider legislation prohibiti g possession of tobacco by inors. This legislation was itiated by the students, and th students met with the Publi Services Committee of Co cil to ~ review the draft le islation which was prepared y the Law Department at C uncil's i request. She corn ended the students for their 'llingness to bring this legi lation forwazd to Coun 1 and to positively impact th community in which they 1' e. i Staff Commen Mr. Ciarochi ed that the agreement with e Tartan Golf Company h now been executed. Sta plans to provide an update the golf course project at t e January 2 Council meeti g. Chief Geis i roduced new Police Officer illiam Morris who fomterl worked for the ~ City of Bexi y and the Franklin County eriff's Department. Mayor Kra tuber welcomed Officer M 's to Dublin. I LEGISLATION j PUBLIC HEARING/SECOND READING -ORDINANCES I Ordinance 51-00 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 25.8 Acres Located on the Southwest Corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road, from: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District, to: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. (Llewellyn Farms South - Wuertz Property - 4189 Tuttle Road -Case File No. 00-0242) (Applicant: National City Bank, Trustee of the Pauline Wuertz Trust/ c% Gary Moreland, 155 E. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215; represented by Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Land Company, 500 S. Front Street, Suite 770, Columbus, OH 43215; and Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith & Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215.) Ben Hale Smith & Hale. representin tg he applicant requested that Council suspend ~ tonight's hearing and refer it back to Planning Commission so that the applicant can continue to work with staff on the issues. Mayor Kranstuber asked if there is any legal issue with Council taking this type of action, noting that PBcZ has recommended disapproval of the rezoning. Mr. Smith responded that this is acceptable, adding that the intent of the applicant is to present a substantially changed plan to PBcZ with the hope of gaining approval. The applicant recognizes that Council is unlikely to vote to override the recommendation oC Planning Commission. Mr. McCash moved to refer the ordinance to Planning and Zoning Commission. Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. 00_0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South PETITION {PRIOR SUBMITTAL) ~ ~c~r~an~ o r~,a O CT 19 Petition Z We, the undersigned, residents of the City ofDublin, Ohio respe (n! ~F (N in Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or n,ri widening either roadway. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 t~r~i WQ1'ZQi 4~12$PaDI.E~kiU-t.~• ~(Pl•~S1 2 ~q~l 0(o Rr`n IN ? -S?~ 3 4 ~b ~nC ' ' iv97ZE' 9 Z - 2S 5 oa ~ 2~ 61 6 /.C 9Ga.1- / st°~? 7~ 3 7 8 ~ 9 o dLo 61 m - 93 -OSa 11 - 30 l 12 13 ~ d ~ - 0 t 14 U / d r I S ~j - ] 6 ' sdI~ !2/DL ~ Liu ~ 3;~? - cr S ' 19 ~ ev~df-c- Sin 7 z Be ~ ld _ $SS 20 t. S r.r1 21 to ~i /rl ~ - 2 .<,G',ZJ 22 - y7~~ r;~,rcrU 23 7 3-qoS~{ 24 f` S 2 b r 793. ct ~ it 26 ~ _ i 27 L~1~ . cC~ y Z Z 28 i ~ - 29 ~`x2 ~ ~ ~ ~ '79 L-1~8 S to 30 SSZ~ ,4 31 ~'~r' 32 55~{ w5 d . ~y~ 33 ' 34 35 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Pet- We, the undersigned, residents of the City of DubiCo Ocil enact the proper zon ng or variances Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City to allow the residential development of the land to u ro eed n a manner cons stenowDhthat of Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) p the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new deexisrin eTuttle and Dublin Roads without he user of access roads oruts ir. and direct access to the g widening either roadway. ADDRESS PHONE NAME 79 -8~ / _ a / 2 / ~ ! 1~ 3 ~ . t c~~ 7 ~ -R.. a ~4-~~ 8 /8 71,y•y~ 9 -9 l0 7~r u~ I1 ~ G ~ 7(o(-ZO 12 S'1(cS 8'89- Z?tl / 13 ~ 5775 •5.~--r7L~5 R- ~S9 14 57 75 P,~CP - G O 1S w~, e3 Ga ~~GS S e ~t~s 17 ~ zi[ 18 ~ 7 6 / ~ ~ 19 g _ ~p 20 ~ 6.10 6 9 • ~rrr 21 ~ SB// ~~L~ 23 r~G~ - 24 07~ Sfa ~`~~r- 25 ° ~ _ 26 u ,~~I ~ ~ c 27 0 (pUa2~ ~ ' OoS- 28 29 S 9`1 ~ ~8~-003 30 L.i ~ 5$ Uti~r uC 31 ill a.,~- l0 6 ~ "3 32 2.L~2 33 Z4'3~ 33 ~~2- ~ -31~ x`12 - 8'f15I~ 34 5~$0 35 ~ch~tL-- s l1b 9.h~3 /~L. art ~ • 7'~l~ z~ ~ 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Petition We, the undersigned, residents of the City of Dublin, Ohio respectfully request that the Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or n widening either roadway. rf NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 a lam. - C 2 Q L(~a~.a G.?a 3 ~ ~a8' r' ~ ~ 1-aHe. 93-o/s g 4 b~` ~ I L, s vi a`~h - Z 3 3 6 ~ ~ -0~3 7 7 8 - s' 7 10 ~ >y ~ 2 oaf 11 ~i1So SridA2 M'~ LI' 1al-q3b~ 12 ri ~ fc~ C-f • -87 P` 13 '1y a~C !-g a-- 14 ~ T 4 34 ,~ridGo~ L/ - s 15 / < L,., 3 ~ ~ 16 c o ~,D~F wry c.~ 7qz 77P9 17 `676 ~3~•~b~E P-rN L,~ ~9~ -oZ~S 18 3- 19 - 20 SS q- 13.a~s~~~ Cif- fS~ - 26~i 21 S~ 4 ~o-L ~b-~ ~`f' r) l- a 7 7 22 - r - $ S 23 'f'll~. ~d Dr • 7G - ~US 24 y~.~ a<il:~iaD~ icy-s3~3 2s Y7L6 ~f-~.~~ ~&'S-6~ 26 ~ 27 28 r,- 'f7~ d A~ ~-~tS7) 29 `F7 3 ~ 794-8~ 30 `f7efl ~I d. i 7~ 6 - IG l 1 31 Y1a /3 ,1 7 32 3~ S~~ 3 3 ~ -p 34 K~ z K ~ ~ N 4G ~YL 7- 35 ~Ib24 Bridlt `1'l:~i, La+,e 'ibl- 3$1,'] 3I7 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Petition We, the undersigned, residents of the City of Dublin, Ohio respectfully request that the Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or widening either roadway. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 ' .Ec'.1? ! i r./c. s'>8:~ C/id rr~,c,~i~~ ~u g / N qz • o 0 3 ~ i 3 ~ ` ~ r~ 5 ; a ~ t~.t~ tiN ~ 7 :1- - sJ- 13 6 ~..~a S~ S 7 L ~ 6~ 7 8 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 4 J~ 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Petition We, the undersigned, residents of the City of Dublin, Ohio respectfully request that the Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or err widening either roadway. ADDRESS PHONE 1 . ~ ~s7 ~ 2 ~ ;3` o`Z ~~S z-o73S 4 x}7(0 76/ -o3Po s ~ `f-~hz. 7 1-03~U 6 4s ~ ~ ~s~- asa 7 y y7~s ~3 f ~s2 ~ s~ 8 6 6 L~ 4-774' 9 R~ a d a ti L - ~'~4 y 10 ~9 6 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ~ ~1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 s~~ 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Petition We, the undersigned, residents of the City of Dublin, Ohio respectfully request that the Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or widening either roadway. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 S~/43 Jfr~ ~ sc~ , >J~bl~.~. ~4/~ 6 a 3 6 ~ f cf- n~ ~ ~ ~4~~ 4 ~ ! - S~ 5 ~ 517 i `?Z-r S 6 `~30 7 5837 la* `7 - /S 8 837 Chun+~ usz ant publ~h GG-l1S 9 D ~ _ ~Q3/ 10 ~ 1~1 s 5'~ S ~ ~ ~c11,~ - q 11 ~1,C Kli.~~ ~40'S c f ~ 'Cl. ~-QM ~(n ~ ^ 12 02 ; 7 2G 13 14 15 16 17 18 w.. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 ' 30 31 32 33 34 35 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Petition We, the undersigned, residents of the City of Dublin, Ohio respectfully request that the Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission and Dublin City Council enact the proper zoning or variances to allow the residential development of the land situated on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road (Llewellyn Farms South) to proceed in a manner consistent with that of the existing residential community on the northwest corner of the same intersection (Llewellyn Farms Phase 3). Specifically, the new development should maintain similar housing density, setbacks, curbcuts and direct access to the existing Tuttle and Dublin Roads without the use of access roads or widening either roadway. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1 i 2 Gs/ ,!r'- RACE' /yI ~Z l'Ur cP~ ~dy~G99 3 ~ ~3 .,u~ R,pC 884 - I / o Q 4 - I q s - s ,J 4 - 6 ~ 5 s~ e< ,J ~y - v ~3 ~ ~ mtx~x~( 5~l00 o S~leO 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 f7~7 00-0242 Rezoning ~ Llewellyn Farms South A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 1, 2001 crr~ c?f nl lcl.f Division of Pla~aung 1800 Shier-Rings Road )ubtut, Ohio 43016-1236 one/f D0:614-161-6550 fax:bl4-161-6566 Web Site: www.dubtm.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning Application 00-0?~,~ -Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) Location: 25.83 acres located on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road. Existing Zoning: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District under the provisions of Section 153.051. Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development of 39 lots and 5.30 acres of open space. Applicant: National City Bank, Trustee of the Pauline Wuertz Trust, c/o Gary Moreland, 155 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; represented by Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Land Company, 500 S. Front Street, Suite 770, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application because it is consistent with the Community Plan, continues the general development pattern along Dublin Road, incorporates existing natural - features in to the open space amenities and provides improved pedestrian connections, with 16 conditions: 1) That the text indicate the applicant is not required to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road, and that it be noted on the preliminary plat; 2) That the installation of all turn lanes and intersection upgrades, as well as the grading and construction of the proposed detention basins preserve the existing tree row, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That a portion of the "No Disturb Zone" along the southern tree line be revised to a "No Build Zone," and that the applicant commit to provide a pedestrian connection to the Monahan subdivision along the southern property line if the opportunity arises, subject to staff approval; 4) That the applicant obtain a sidewalk waiver for applicable portions of the proposed plans or that all Code requirements be met; 5) That the applicant obtain necessary easements/agreements to construct pedestrian connections on the school site, and that the developer work with the school and staff to determine an appropriate layout; Page 1 of 2 ~~nNOON S ~ ~ o/ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION MARCH 1, 2001 1. Rezoning Application 00-0242 - Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) (Continued) 6) That protective tree fencing be installed prior to and during all phases of ` construction and that fencing plans be field-adjusted as needed, subject to staff approval; 7) That final details of the landscaping and fencing plan in public open spaces, as well as access to the barn be determined at the time of the preliminary plat and that all reserves be fine graded and seeded prior to dedication to the City; 8) That a street tree waiver be obtained for Tuttle Road, and that an alternative planting plan includi~ig ornamental trees be developed with staff to augment and extend the existing tree row or that Code requirements be met; 9) That all entry features meet engineering requirements for visibility triangles, to the satisfaction of staff; 10) That no open road cuts be permitted through Dublin Road or Tuttle Road for the extension of utilities and infrastructure, that necessary easements be obtained, and that all utility connections and extensions meet City standards; 11) That detailed stormwater calculations be provided at the time of final plat review and that all headwalls be constructed to City standards with additional landscape screening, to the satisfaction of staff; 12) That plans be revised consistent with the submitted zoning text, dated February 23, 2001; 13) That Lot 7 be eliminated from the proposal, and that the cul-de-sac at the terminus of Belfield Drive be adjusted accordingly; 14) That the five-foot pedestrian connection between Burnham Court and the school playground be constructed of concrete; 15) That existing rip rap at the southwest corner of the site be removed, and the area be restored with this development, to the satisfaction of staff; and 16) That a notation be added to the final plat informing future homeowners of a potential bridge connection. * Charles Driscoll agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5-2. RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFIC ION Carson Combs Planner Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 1, 2001 crr~ ur ln~~l,l~ Division of Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road ~9ublin, Ohio 43016-1236 irr~one/TOD: 614-761-6 S SO Fax: 614-761-6566 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us 1. Rezoning Application 00-0242 -Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) Location: 25.83 acres located on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road. Existing Zoning: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District under the provisions of Section 153.051. Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development. of 391ots and 5.30 acres of open space. Applicant: National City Bank, Trustee of the Pauline Wuertz Trust, cIo Gary Moreland, 155 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; represented by Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Land Company, 500 S. Front Street, Suite 770, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Carson Combs, Planner. UPDATE: On October 19, 2000, the Commission heard a rezoning request for a proposed single-family residential development of 52 lots and 5.14 acres of open space. The Commission disapproved ~ the rezoning application unanimously, based largely on park and layout issues. The application was forwarded to City Council with a negative. recommendation. At the Council meeting on November 11, 2000, the applicant requested removal of the ordinance from consideration, and Council referred it back to the Planning Commission. On February 15, 2001, a revised proposal was tabled by the Commission at the request of the applicant due to the late hour. Since that time, the applicant has revised the zoning text to reflect many conditions from the previous staff report. The applicant and staff have also met with nearby residents and will continue to work with residents through the development process: • Staff has attended meetings with the Llewellyn Farms civic association to answer questions regarding the proposed rezoning plans. Substantial considerations for open space and pedestrian connections have been addressed with this revised proposal. • Staff and the applicant have met with representatives from Monahan Estates to discuss concerns related to this rezoning application. Extending sidewalks southward along Dublin Road, providing a bikepath along the southern tree row to connect with Thomas Elementary, and modifying the No Disturb Zone along the southern tree row were discussed. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -March 1, 2001 < Page 2 BACKGROUND: The Wuertz tract is part of 251 acres annexed from Washington Township in 1980 and has been zoned R-1, Restricted Suburban Development District, since that time. Rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District, is requested for asingle-family subdivision of 391ots. The PLR District establishes the permissible uses, density, development standards, location and size of park areas, and the preliminary layout. The Planning and Zoning Commission must make a recommendation on the rezoning request based on the following criteria in Section 153.051(B)(3)(a) and (b): • That the proposed development is consistent in all respects with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the zoning ordinance; • That the proposed development is in conformity with a comprehensive plan or portion thereof as it may apply; • That the proposed development advances the general welfare of the municipality and the immediate vicinity; • That the benefits, improved arrangement, and the design of the proposed development justify the deviation from standard residential development requirements included in the zoning ordinance; and • That the following shall be considered, including but not limited to: uses and intensity of use, traffic and circulation, building height, yard requirements at the development periphery, spaces between buildings and open areas, street widths and setbacks, and phasing and timing of development. The application is then returned to City Council for scheduling of a public hearing and final vote. A two-thirds vote of City Council is necessary to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. The development will also be subject to the preliminary and final platting requirements at a later date. CONSIDERATIONS: Site Characteristics: • The site is a rectangular 25.83-acre tract used for agricultural purposes. An existing farmstead is located along Tuttle Road near the Belfield Drive entrance to the Llewellyn Farms subdivision. The 3/4-acre homestead includes a residence with a small barn and outbuilding. As proposed, all structures will be razed except for the existing barn, which will serve as an entry feature amenity. Overhead utility lines are located on the site along the western side of Dublin Road and the south side of Tuttle Road. The site gradually slopes downward from west to east toward Dublin Road and the Scioto River. Substantial tree rows are located along Tuttle Road and the south property line. The tree row along Tuttle Road lies adjacent to an existing swale and includes remnants of dry-laid stone walls. • The property is currently zoned R-l, Restricted Suburban Residential District. To the north is the Llewellyn Farms subdivision zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District. To the east are large-lot residences, and to the west is the Thomas Elementary School (both 1 _ - Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -March 1, 2001 Page 3 zoned R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District). To the south is the Monahan Estates subdivision located within the City of Columbus. Site Plan and Development Standards: • The proposed rezoning is for a residential subdivision of 39 single-family lots with entrances along Dublin Road and Tuttle Road. The development includes the extension of Belfield Drive as asingle-loaded road through the site, creating a semicircular park space with homes facing toward Tuttle Road. Other streets within the development include Limestone Ridge Drive and Burnham Court, which ends in a loop with internal open space that provides views for surrounding residences. Lots adjacent to Dublin Road will extend the development pattern established to the north, providing larger lots with shared access onto Dublin Road. No lots will front onto or have direct access onto Tuttle Road. • Indicated green space will link the Llewellyn Farms Park and Thomas Elementary site to Tuttle Road. This development expands the open space system of the school site and provides a larger passive green space that. is highly accessible to the residents. The open space and orientation/layout of streets provides improved linkages to the existing park and school site, providing an extension of the pedestrian system within the Llewellyn Farms Park. An additional "central green" is provided within Burnham Court that will create a visual amenity and informal play space. • The text specifies a minimum 10,400 square-foot lot. The minimum lot width for the subdivision is 80 feet. Required sideyards include six-foot minimum and a 14-foot combined sideyard. Required rear yard setbacks are 25 feet. Lots along Dublin Road have been enlarged to 120 feet in width with. a depth of approximately 190 feet. Similar lots within Llewellyn Farms are 125 feet by 200 feet. • The proposed building setback along Dublin Road is 90 feet, consistent with similar lots in Llewellyn Farms, and the setback along Tuttle Road is 50 feet. The zoning text also indicates a 20-foot no-build zone along the rear of all residential lots. In addition, a 20- foot no build zone is required along the side yards of all residential lots abutting public open space, consistent with current policy. Plans will be re-submitted prior to Council review to match the revised text. This development will be subject to the requirements of Ordinance # 101-00 (Amended) regarding changes to the subdivision regulations. The ordinance sets requirements for variations in lot widths and setbacks within residential subdivisions. In addition, the ordinance requires a 65-foot buildable depth for lots, requires utilities and mechanicals to be placed within rear yards, and addresses bikepath requirements. Proposals must comply with this ordinance at the preliminary plat stage, and the proposed plans appear to comply. • Plans generally indicate a 25-foot No Disturb Zone along the southern property line to protect the existing tree row. While a majority of the tree row is in a natural state, the eastern edge has been removed by the installation of public infrastructure. That portion has been replanted and is maintained. Based on the request of nearby residents, staff recommends that the "No Disturb Zone" be revised to a "No Build Zone" along that portion of tree row. Community Plan: • The Community Plan recommends a density of 1.0 to 2.0 units per acre for single-family residential use. The Llewellyn Farms subdivision to the north has a density of 2.38 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -March 1, 2001 Page 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density will be 1.51 dwelling units per acre and conforms to the Plan. Proposed rights-of--way for both Tuttle Road and Dublin Road are 80 feet on the adopted Thoroughfare Plana The applicant will dedicate right-of--way along Dublin Road and Tuttle Road consistent with the Plan. The Community Plan projects Tuttle Road in the long-term (post 2020) as four lanes, with a right-of--way extension 100 feet wide between Dublin Road and Riverside Drive. The adopted Thoroughfare Plan designates Tuttle Road as a location for a possible future bridge across the Scioto River. The primary goal of the Community Plan was to ensure that ~ a suitable quality of life would be preserved at the time of build-out estimated at 2040. Traffic levels and trip generation tested within the Thoroughfare Plan examined all potential sites across the Scioto River and specifically included the future bridge at this location and at Memorial Drive in the adopted build-out scenario. No engineering feasibility of land acquisition has been undertaken at this time. • The Community Plan recommends a setback of 200 feet along all scenic roads, including Dublin Road.. According to the pending "Road to Wow!" program, Dublin Road is designated as River Heritage character. River Heritage is typified by the presence of water features, naturalized landscaping, natural stone outcrops and dry-laid stone walls. The program, which is not adopted at this time, would require a 100-foot setback. The development text indicates a required setback of 90 feet along Dublin Road. The proposed development does not incorporate any "Wow" elements, but will continue the current established residential development pattern. Access and Circulation: The proposed development will have two access points, as recommended by the Commission and consistent with City policy. Belfield Drive will be extended into the site from Tuttle Road. A second entrance will be located along Dublin Road. The construction of left turn lanes along substandard roads (Dublin Road and Tuttle Road) as well as any necessary intersection upgrades will be required for this development. The text should be revised to include the developer's responsibility for a left turn lane along Dublin Road and necessary road improvements should preserve the existing tree row along Tuttle Road. Lots along Dublin Road will utilize shared driveways. Those fronting on both Dublin Road and Limestone Ridge Drive will be limited to access only onto the subdivision street. Streets within the development will utilize a 50-foot right-of--way with pavement 28 feet, back-to-back of curb. Parking will be restricted to one side of the street. The text indicates that internal subdivision streets will utilize four-foot concrete sidewalks with afive-foot sidewalk along Dublin Road. Representatives from Monahan Estates have requested that the sidewalk be extended southward to the subdivision entrance. An eight- foot asphalt bike path is proposed to link the existing school crosswalk with Dublin Road through the proposed open space areas. The developer will also provide afive-foot asphalt connector between the loop on Burnham Court. The exact location will be determined at a later date. The applicant has also committed to provide a path along the southern tree row to link Monahan Estates with the elementary school site if an easement is granted to any of the cul-de-sacs. Staff recommends that the applicant provide an additional pedestrian connection if the opportunity arises. ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -March 1, 2001 Page 5 • Sidewalks will not be installed along the north side of the Belfield Drive connection. Staff will support a sidewalk waiver for the north side of Belfield Drive to enhance the visual quality of the park, while not impacting the connectivity of the pedestrian system. • A painted, raised crosswalk has been installed between Thomas Elementary and the Llewellyn Farms Park on Tuttle Road. The proposed eight-foot asphalt bikepath will be extended from the crosswalk along Tuttle Road behind the existing treerow to Dublin Road to accommodate the physical characteristics of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant be responsible for obtaining any necessary easements or agreements to install the portion of the connection on the school site. Open Space, Landscaping and Tree Preservation: • The subdivision plan includes two separate green spaces that are 1.86 and 3.44 acres. One acre will serve as stormwater detention, providing a total of 4.3 acres that meet the required 2.66 acres, based on 39 lots and 25.83 acres. Not included is additional green space within the loop on Burham Court to be dedicated within the right-of--way. Open space within the development will be dedicated to the City and maintained by a forced and funded homeowner's association. The City, however, will maintain the barn and will be responsible for the maintenance of paths connecting to the school. • A tree survey has been submitted for the site that includes those along Tuttle Road. Proposed protection fencing is located at a minimum distance of 20 feet from trees to be preserved. Staff recommends that proposed tree fencing be field adjusted as deemed necessary and that the fencing remains during all phases of construction. • A combined fencing and landscape buffer is proposed along the perimeter of public open spaces adjacent to residential lots. Plantings will combine a mix of deciduous shade trees, ornamentals and evergreens. The development text indicates the existing barn will be preserved as a visual amenity for use by the City, and that the structure will be repaired and painted prior to dedication. Staff recommends that more specific details of the fencing and landscape buffer be indicated at the preliminary plat stage. All open spaces should be fine graded and seeded prior to dedication, and a final access point to the barn be determined at the preliminary plat stage. Street trees indicated in the text have been approved by the City Forester. While Code requires that street trees be planted along all public streets, site conditions and the presence of an existing naturalized tree row along Tuttle Road limit the ability to implement a standard street tree design. Staff will support a waiver for the formal street tree requirements along Tuttle Road on the condition that the applicant work with staff to develop an appropriate plan that will utilize a like number of trees to augment and extend the naturalized tree row that currently exists. • Entrance features for this development will coordinate with those in Llewellyn Farms. The Tuttle Road entry feature will incorporate a stone column with dry-laid stone wall, accented by landscaping. Signage on the wall will be a maximum 24 square feet. The Dublin Road feature will be more subdued, utilizing stone columns and landscaping, with a maximum sign face of four square feet. Staff recommends that all entry features be sited to allow for required visibility triangles. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -March 1, 2001 Page 6 Utilities and Stormwater: • Utilities will be supplied from existing lines located adjacent to the site. Amain sanitary trunk line (72-inch pipe) is located along Dublin Road, and an additional line is located in the Monahan subdivision to the south and will be used for connection with this site. Public water is also available from an existing 12-inch line on the north side of Tuttle Road and from an existing 16-inch line along the western side of Dublin Road that will be utilized. No open cuts of the existing roadways will be permitted. • No stormwater easements were granted through this site during the construction of the Preserve office development. Stormwater from the existing catch basin near the ~ southwest corner of the site will be incorporated into the design of infrastructure with this development. Two dry detention basins totaling one acre are proposed along Tuttle Road. Grading and construction of the proposed basins should not impact the existing tree row along Tuttle Road, and detailed calculations for Stormwater should also be submitted prior to review of the final plat. • Submitted Stormwater feasibility plans incorrectly indicate proposed infrastructure through the western detention basin and should be revised. Staff also recommends that landscape screening be provided around headwalls and that they be constructed to meet City standards. Architecture: • Architecture for the proposed subdivision will be similar in quality to the Llewellyn Farms development. Homes will be constructed of a material palette that includes brick, stone, wood, stucco and Nardi-plank. Homes will utilize dimensional asphalt shingles. Chimneys will be constructed of brick, masonry or stucco. A diversity matrix has been submitted and reviewed by staff. Fencing: • The text prohibits chain link or metal fencing. Fencing is also prohibited forward of the building line on all lots. All fencing must otherwise meet Code requirements. Text and plans also indicate a combined fence and landscape buffer plan between residential lots and open space as previously discussed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this revised proposal for the site and finds the development to be much improved over the previous plan. It provides an appropriate density and extends the quality of development within Llewellyn Farms. The development would provide an acceptable land use at a density recommended by the Community Plan, while conforming to the adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The development will provide a substantially improved site plan that will protect existing natural features, while creating an improved open space system with adequate pedestrian linkages. Staff recommends approval with 13 conditions: Conditions: 1) That the text indicate the responsibility of the applicant to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road; ~ W Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission . Staff Report -March 1, 2001 Page 7 2) That the installation of all turn lanes and intersection upgrades, as well as the grading and construction of the proposed detention basins preserve the existing tree row, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That a portion of the "No Disturb Zone" along the southern tree line be revised to a "No Build Zone," and that the applicant commit to provide a pedestrian connection to the Monahan subdivision along the southern property line if the opportunity arises, subject to staff approval; 4) That the applicant obtain a sidewalk waiver for applicable portions of the proposed plans or that all Code requirements be met; 5) That the applicant obtain necessary easements/agreements to construct pedestrian ~ connections on the school site, and that the developer work with the school and staff to determine an appropriate layout; 6) That protective tree fencing be installed prior to and during all phases of construction and that fencing plans be revised as needed, subject to staff approval; 7) That final details of the landscaping and fencing plan in public open spaces, as well as access to the barn be determined at the time of the preliminary plat and that all reserves be fine graded and seeded prior to dedication to the City; 8) That a street tree waiver be obtained for Tuttle Road, and that an alternative planting plan be developed with staff to augment and extend the existing tree row, or that Code requirements be met; 9) That all entry features meet engineering requirements for visibility triangles, to the satisfaction of staff; 10) That no open road cuts be permitted through Dublin Road or Tuttle Road for the extension of utilities and infrastructure and that necessary easements be obtained and that all utility connections and extensions meet City standards; 11) That detailed stormwater calculations be provided at the time of final plat review and that all headwalls be constructed to City standards with additional landscape screening, to the satisfaction of staff; 12) That the No Disturb Zone along the southern tree row be revised, to the satisfaction of staff; and 13) That plans be revised consistent with the submitted zoning text, dated February 23, 2001. ~+wn. Bases: 1) The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Community Plan and continues the general development pattern along Dublin Road. 2) The development incorporates existing natural features in a positive manner as open space amenities. 3) The development provides much improved pedestrian connections to surrounding public amenities for residents within the future development and surrounding neighborhoods. .w YEl[ G V / ts$~ ~ A~ o `o ~ d KAAIDVI~'ir DR ~ \ 93 x ° ~ 4 T WP ~ % / ~ cRE~ ~ ~ i 1 b~ ~ ,,max ; Ee ~ c SITE ~ ~ ~M~~ D12 ? ~ m ~ i a. B IDE ~ BE ~ 1 S' b~ 1 1 Q~ a~ ~ P~ CENTER AVE B~I.D CT ~ ~ - I ~Q, w ~ ~ TvrrLE Ro T nE `~x° ~G E4 I ~ fps NG ' 1 MAl ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y, ~ - J ~1 \ WEB E ~'wNON SPAY ~ ? ? ~ ~o PL DR F ~ ' COLUMBUS ~ ~ ~ ~ynEN ~ ~ i ~ ~ b d I ItUI1 ~ ~ B i LTHEL !Zp b 1 ~ 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South u ~ ~ j l1 ' -1 i ~ P R- ' a a:: PUD p~~ f o TWP ° ,i E ~ ~ SO ~ O R I S C , c OLR O ~ D PU a - ~ ° . P ~ D ~ ~I ° yi ~n~-~ - R-1 i i ~ a~ ~ v N \ 6 ~ 6 ~ ~ a ~S ~ ~ d ~ 00-0242 Rezoning ~ Llewellyn Farms South b _ 1~~~-,--~7 11-1 I Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 2 1. Rezoning Application 00-0242 Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) Carson Combs said .this is a request to rezone to a PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. He said on October 19, 2000, the Commission disapproved a rezoning request for this site for 52 lots and 5.14 acres of open space. The applicant withdrew the request prior to Council's public hearing. This is a completely different proposal. Mr. Combs said the site is located on the southeast corner of Tuttle and Dublin Roads. To the west of the site is Thomas Elementary School, and to the north is Llewellyn Farms, zoned PUD. ~ Monahan Estates is to the south. He showed several slides. ..i This proposal consists of 391ots and 5.4 acres of openspace which includes a barn. There will be a pedestrian connection to the school. Many lots will have a 20-foot no-build zone. Where side property lines abut the openspace, there is a 20-foot no-build zone. The south end of the property has a no-disturb zone. Staff is requesting that this area be revised as a no-build zone. The development standards include a minimum 80-foot lot width with a minimum square footage of 10,400. There is a 90-foot building setback along Dublin Road, and a 50-foot setback along Tuttle Road. The side yard is six feet, combined side yard is 14 feet, and a rear yard is 25 feet. The openspace is 5.3 acres of which only 2.66 are required according to the ordinance. The subdivision streets will be a 50-foot right-of--way with a 28-foot back-to-back of curb pavement. Mr. Combs said the general issues with this proposal are the turn lanes on both Dublin Road and Tuttle Road. He said the developer agrees only to do the turn lane on Tuttle Road, plus any intersection improvements that are needed at Dublin and Tuttle Roads. Another issue is a pedestrian connection along Dublin Road to the Monahan Estates entrance and a possible bikepath along the southern property line. He said staff recommends approval with 13 conditions: 1) That the text indicate the responsibility of the applicant to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road; 2) That the installation of all turn lanes and intersection upgrades, as well as the grading and construction of the proposed detention basins preserve the existing tree row, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That a portion of the "No Disturb Zone" along the southern tree line be revised to a "No Build Zone," and that the applicant commit to provide a pedestrian connection to the Monahan subdivision along the southern .property line if the opportunity arises, subject to staff approval; 4) That the applicant obtain a sidewalk waiver for applicable portions of the proposed plans or that all Code requirements be met; 5) That the applicant obtain necessary easements/agreements to construct pedestrian connections on the school site, and that the developer work with the school and staff to determine an appropriate layout; 6) That protective tree fencing be installed prior to and during all phases of construction and that fencing plans be revised as needed, subject to staff approval; 7) That final details of the landscaping and fencing plan in public open spaces, as well as access to the barn be determined at the time of the preliminary plat and that all .reserves be fine graded and seeded prior to dedication to the City; .¦r Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission . Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 3 8) That a street tree waiver be obtained for Tuttle Road, and that an alternative planting plan be developed with staff to augment and extend the existing tree row, or that Code requirements be met; 9) That all entry features meet engineering requirements for visibility triangles, to the satisfaction of staff; 10) That no open road cuts be permitted through Dublin Road or Tuttle Road for the extension of utilities and infrastructure and that necessary easements be obtained and that all utility connections and extensions meet City standards; 11) That detailed stormwater calculations be provided at the time of final plat review and that all headwalls be constructed to City standards with additional landscape screening, to the satisfaction of staff; 12) That the No Disturb Zone along the southern tree row be revised, to the satisfaction of staff; and 13) That plans be revised consistent with the submitted zoning text, dated February 23, 2001. Ms. Boring asked if anyone inspected the barn to see if it is structurally sound. Mr. Comb said staff had checked the barn for usage. It is intended to be a visual amenity to the park. Ms. Boring said she would like the barn to be safe for the neighborhood. Mr. Hahn said the two locked barns in Earlington and Bristol Commons parks are used for storage, and there have been no problems. Ms. Boring said she would like to add to Condition 6 after "fencing plans be revised", "and field adjusted." Mr. Combs said the Landscape Inspector does that. Ms. Boring asked if more ornamental trees could be added. Ms. Newcomb said the Tuttle Road buffer is a possible spot. There is a possible a waiver from the standard street tree requirements, and this would be a good place for some smaller trees. Mr. Eastep asked why the connector was afive-foot wide asphalt path. Mr. Combs said the applicant has agreed to this. All of the internal streets have four-foot sidewalks. Hahn suggested a five-foot wide concrete path. Mr. Eastep noted that the plans showed the barn as a future community center. Mr. Combs said that idea had been dropped. Mr. Hahn said he thought with some renovation to meet Code for educational usage, it could be used if needed. Mr. Eastep asked if the existing drive will be gated. Mr. Hahn said they would secure it. Mr. Hammersmith said the two dry basins will be run straight to the river. Ms. Boring asked if the existing stone fence would stay. Mr. Combs said they were maintained by Monahan Estates residents to delineate the southern boundary line. Mr. Lecklider asked if landscaping could be added to soften the appearance of the dry detention areas. Ms. Newcomb said she suggested they be kept open. Mr. Lecklider thought something along the perimeter was necessary. Charlie Driscoll, The Edwards Companies, said they made plan changes to address the Commission's concerns. The density was reduced to 1.51 du/ac per acre, or 39 homes. They r•~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 4 removed all driveways from Tuttle Road, and provided two access walks into the school area. They have more openspace than that is required. They added a second entrance on Dublin Road. Mr. Driscoll did not agree with Condition 1 regarding the second turn lane on Dublin Road. They do not see a reason for a turn lane for only 35 homes. He said Dublin Road is quiet, even during rush hours. A chart prepared by their traffic engineer was distributed. Gary Wilcox, traffic engineer for the applicant, said ODOT has developed the standards for turn lanes, based on national standards. They account for percentage of turns and traffic on the roads. ~ He said there are 228 vehicles per hour and in the other direction they have 157 vehicles an hour. That amounts to four cars per minute in the peak hour. Mr. Wilcox said with atwo- percent traffic increase, they would have to provide a turn lane. Mr. Eastep and Ms. Salay did not think a turn lane for this subdivision made sense. Mr. Hammersmith said as Tuttle Road is improved, there are intersection improvements planned. He said it is not in the Five-year CIP. Mr. Hammersmith said it has been City policy to require turn lanes for new developments. Mr. Driscoll asked for a waiver of Condition 1. He said the Monahan neighborhood children were used to cutting across this property. He said that he is happy to hook up a path to their subdivision, but he doesn't know where to put it. He is willing to put a path from Monahan to his road and to his sidewalk to lead to the school, but a connection is needed from their side. Mr. Eastep asked if he would make this afive-foot concrete path. Mr. Driscoll agreed. Mr. Fishman asked if they could eliminate Lot 7 to add to the vista of the open space. Mr. Driscoll asked if they could reduce the 120-foot lots along Dublin Road to 100 feet. He is not willing to give up any lots. Ms. Boring said he could move Lot 7 to Dublin Road and change those lots to smaller widths. Mr. Hale agreed. Rich Gomez said the residents do not want a turn lane. Mr. Eastep proposed that the turn lane on Dublin Road is not needed, and that they eliminate Lot 7. Mr. Fishman and Ms. Salay agreed. Ms. Boring said the # 1 complaint in Dublin is transportation and ease of getting around. A left- turn lane policy was established so the City does not have to come back and pay later to put in left turn lanes. She said the City Engineer's recommendations must be upheld. Mr. Gomez said his main coi:cern was the left turn lane on Dublin Road. The residents are upset about it. Dublin Road is a heritage scenic route. This is an issue he thinks he could get a referendum. Chris Joos, Monahan Civic Association said they expected that this area would be developed. He presented a PowerPoint presentation. Their only two goals were that this be asingle-family *As amended by approved motion at the April 19, 2001 meeting. M ` Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 5 development, and that a connection or bikepath be considered. The proposed 39 lots are great, and that they supported a pedestrian access to their subdivision. Steve Petty, Whitegate Court, said his numerous requests for a bikepath as part of this development had largely been ignored. There is little greenspace in their neighborhood. They used the existing path and maintain it. Mr. Petty showed pictures of improvements that burdened their neighborhood. (The "odor eater" sewer and the stormwater drain that dumps into their backyards.) He said the stone fence was on his property line. The tree line is nice, but very narrow. He wondered why stormwater from i.. Dublin would be taken to their Columbus neighborhood. Mr. Petty showed a photo of the major northern shaft for the deep tunnel sanitary sewer. He said they worked with the City of Columbus to come up with a landscape plan. Now, there is an odor problem in the sewer. The City of Columbus told them that Dublin did not want it in Dublin. He said the landscaping will have to be removed. He said sewer gas will be blown through a bed of chips which will produce noise and smell. Jerome Nypaver, Bandon Court, asked that their children be considered and that a pedestrian path be constructed through this property to the school. He said Llewellyn Farms and other residents are being held hostage by the Tuttle Mall ghost bridge. The bridge shown on the Community Plan. It will require razing homes, trees and route traffic through their neighborhood. Abridge and road widening would destroy a great neighborhood. Ms. Boring asked why the stormwater construction looked so bad. Mr. Hammersmith said he understood The Preserve was unable to acquire an easement across the Wuertz property for stormwater. The situation was resolved temporarily, waiting for this site to develop. An above ground surface drain was tight and without adequate outflow, that is what resulted at the property line. Ms. Boring asked if when the Commission reviewed the Preserve, it should be a condition that this unsightliness gets cleared. Mr. Hammersmith said the problem would be solved when this subdivision is completed. He said the structure will still be there, but the rocks will not. It will remain a rear inlet. Sos Codispoti, Llewellyn Farms Civic Association, said he also represented 150 residents along Dublin Road. He said the majority of the residents oppose the plan for the Llewellyn Farms South subdivision. They wanted the same character and consistency with their neighborhood. This development is centered around approval of curb cuts on Tuttle Road. He disagreed with the City position on this. Mr. Codispoti said this submittal reflects stafFs desire rather than the residents. He said their request has never seriously been entertained. What is called greenspace now, becomes afour- lane highway and eventually a bridge. Homes consistently face the street to maintain intimate neighborhood aesthetics, and this should be the same. The Commission's decision today is not reflecting the will of the majority of Llewellyn Farms and Dublin Road residents (350 households). Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 . Page 6 Ms. Boring asked what was the possibility of considering a tunnel on Tuttle Road. Mr. Driscoll said no, and he could not imagine the cost of a tunnel being drilled through the rock. Mr. Fishman asked if the applicant was willing to align with anything existing in the neighboring subdivision. Mr. Driscoll agreed. Mr. Hale said the existing residents would need to provide easements and build a bikepath to this bikepath. Mr. Fishman said the onus was on them. Mr. Hale said constructing a bikepath the entire way would destroy the no-build zone. He said it would decrease the value of the new lots. He said they agreed to do the community standard which is to put the paths between the houses. It will give children access to the school. There is another access at the end of the court. Mr. Driscoll asked if they could drop the turn lane on Dublin Road, they could straighten the access and have it go into the court and add another lot. Instead of having a curve around the. corner, it would be a right turn only. It would provide a wonderful vista. Mr. Eastep did not want the curvilinear street made into a grid. Ms. Boring agreed. Mr. Fishman wanted something done about the two lots to get the vista and connect all the parks. Mr. Hale said a note saying "No turn lanes required" should be on the plat and if required to construct a turn lane, then one lot would be added back. Mr. Fishman did not think it was good policy to trade lots for turn lanes. Mr. Driscoll proposed to drop Lots 7 and 39 (two most northern), make five lots 80-feet wide, relocate the lot and drop the turn lane on Dublin Road. Mr. Sprague said that would help preserve Dublin's Scenic Corridor. Mr. Eastep did not like Mr. Driscoll's last proposal. He did not want to see a perpendicular intersection and destruction of the 100-foot lots. He said there is a great mixture in the neighborhood now. He said he would eliminate Lot 7 and the turn lanes. Mr. Fishman said he did not want the left turn lane eliminated. Mr. Sprague liked Mr. Driscoll's latest proposal and the initial proposal. Mr. Peplow saw no need for the left turn lane and if the lots could be reduced to provide more vista, he liked the idea. Ms. Salay wanted to keep the 100- . foot lots around the park. She was in favor of dropping Lot 7 and saw no need for the left turn lane. Mr. Lecklider said he would like to see Lot 7 eliminated, and he was not sure there was justification for the left-turn lane on Dublin Road. Mr. Hale asked if there was a problem with re-doing the area to the south, turning Lot 13 into two lots. Mr. Lecklider and Ms. Salay did not want to lose the curvilinear street.. Mr. Lecklider did not want to see Lots 33 - 39 smaller. He would agree to dropping the turn lane and Lot 7. The majority of the Commissioners agreed to eliminate Lot 7 and the turn lane. Mr. Lecklider requested that a condition regarding the potential bridge location be made similar to that used in Amberleigh. Mr. Hammersmith took exception to negotiating away left turn lanes, in conflict with the established policy. - _ _1 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 7 Mr. Lecklider asked Mr. Joos if he could provide a connection from the Monahan neighborhood. Mr. Joos said the area is narrow and he could not guarantee a perfect spot. Landscaping is already in place in this 18-year old neighborhood. He said the only other option was a nature trail or something. He suggested that if some of the brush was removed, leaving the large trees, and landscaped to one of the stone walls, at least there is a 25-foot area that could be used without incurring much expense. Mr. Fishman said an easement is needed from the neighbors. Mr. Hammersmith said that had been done in Killilea 4.. err Mr. Petty said a single point would not work because there are at least three courts that end along the line. Mr. Lecklider suggested that more than one point be identified. Mr. Lecklider said he saw opportunities for a path from Whitegate Court. He thanked Mr. Petty. Mr. Eastep said this was a great improvement over the past proposal. It provides a nice subdivision for the area, still maintaining -the scenic and riverfront character of Dublin Road without the curbcuts. He said this is a good project and welcomed it into the community. Mr. Fishman agreed. Ms. Boring congratulated the Llewellyn Farms Civic Association. She did not think the bridge will ever be built because of the property costs. She said she was not in favor of it. Ms. Salay appreciated Mr. Driscoll for the changes made. She disagreed that this development advanced the general welfare of the municipality and the immediate vicinity. Mr. Peplow said the issues for which he previously voted against this rezoning previously had been addressed. It is a lovely development. He said it is low density with wonderful amenities. He believes there should be warrant studies for every left turn lane. Mr. Sprague concurred with the comments of Messrs. Eastep, Fishman, and Peplow. This offers the Llewellyn Farms residents a better opportunity than the previous plan. Their problem with the Thoroughfare Plan should be addressed at City Council. Mr. Lecklider thanked everyone for their participation. He said he has offered support to Llewellyn Farms in the past with issues such as the mall and Marriott signs. He said he continued to maintain the same high standards for every part of Dublin. He said in fact, it is "our" city and schools. Sides should not be chosen. Mr. Lecklider said he appreciated Mr. Hammersmith's comment about the left turn lane, but he does not see any safety issue here. He said his vote is not an endorsement of a future widening of this road or a future bridge. He is opposed to the adding of curbcuts along a road having the character of Tuttle Road, as he opposes them along Wilcox and Rings Roads. Mr. Eastep made the motion to approve this rezoning application because it is consistent with the Community Plan, continues the general development pattern along Dublin Road, incorporates existing natural features in the open space amenities and provides improved pedestrian connections, with 16 conditions: w. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -March 1, 2001 Page 8 1) That the text indicate the applicant is not required to install a left turn lane along Dublin Road, and that it be noted on the preliminary plat; 2) That the installation of all turn lanes and intersection upgrades, as well as the grading and construction of the proposed detention basins, preserve the existing tree row, to the satisfaction of staff; 3) That a portion of the "no disturb zone" along the southern tree line be revised to a "no build zone," and that the applicant commit to provide a pedestrian connection to Monahan Estates along the southern property line if the opportunity arises, subject to staff approval; 4) That the a sidewalk waiver be obtained for applicable portions of the proposed plans or that all Code requirements be met; 5) That the applicant obtain necessary easements/agreements to construct pedestrian connections on the school site be obtained, and that the developer work with the school and staff to determine an appropriate layout; 6) That protective tree fencing be installed prior to and during all phases of construction and that fencing plans be field-adjusted as needed, subject to staff approval; 7) That final details of the landscaping and fencing plan in public open spaces, as well as access to the barn be determined at the time of the preliminary plat and that all reserves be fine-graded and seeded prior to dedication to the City; 8) That a street tree waiver be obtained for Tuttle Road, and that an alternative planting plan including ornamental trees be developed with staff to augment and extend the existing tree row or that Code requirements be met; 9) That all entry features meet requirements for visibility triangles; 10) That no open road cuts be permitted through Dublin Road or Tuttle Road for the extension of utilities and infrastructure, that necessary easements be obtained, and that all utility connections and extensions meet City standards; 11) That detailed stormwater calculations be provided at the time of preliminary plat review, and that all headwalls be constructed to City standards with additional landscape screening, to the satisfaction of staff; 12) That plans be revised consistent with the submitted zoning text, dated February 23, 2001; 13) That Lot 7 be eliminated from the proposal, and that the cul-de-sac at the terminus of Belfield Drive be adjusted accordingly; 14) That the five-foot pedestrian connection between Burnham Court and the school playground be constructed of concrete; 15) That existing rip rap at the southwest corner of the site be removed, and the area be restored with this development, to the satisfaction of staff; and 16) That a notation be added to the final plat informing future homeowners of a potential bridge connection. Mr. Driscoll agreed to the conditions listed above. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Boring, no; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Salay, no; Mr. Fishman, yes; and Mr. Eastep, yes. (Approved 5-2.) Ms. Boring said this plan would be much more agreeable to the residents if they knew about the bridge. She asked why Dublin had to construct all the bridge crossings. She thought it made sense that Dublin work with Columbus on appropriate locations. She said Dublin cooperated with the Sawmill interchange, and it was not in Dublin. Mr. Gibson said the Thoroughfare Plan was approved as part of the Community Plan, adopted by City Council. He said that does not rule out a collaboration with the City of Columbus. w PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION October 19, 2000 crr~ clr nl af.f~ Oivfsioa of Marn~ing 5800Shier-Rags Raad Dublin, Oha 43016-1236 iMa~e/100: 614-161-b550 fax: 614-161.6566 Web Side: www.du6lm-ah-us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning 00-0242 -Llewellyn Farms South (Wuertz Property) Location: 25.8 acres located on the southwest corner of Dublin Road and Tuttle Road. Existing Zoning: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District. Request: Review and approval of a rezoning to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District under the provisions of Section 153.051. Proposed Use: Asingle-family residential development of 52 lots and 5.14 acres of open space. Applicant: National City Bank, Trustee of the Pauline Wuertz Trust, c% Gary Moreland, 155 E. Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; represented by Charles Driscoll, The Edwards Land Company, 500 S. Front Street, Suite 770, Columbus, Ohio 43215; and Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To disapprove this rezoning application because the proposed plan is not consistent with the adopted Thoroughfare Plan, and it does not address the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance or incorporate important natural features. The open space does not provide a clear system with sufficient linkages to surrounding public sites and residential areas. In addition, the proposed plan does not demonstrate stormwater feasibility or meet the subdivision regulations. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This rezoning application was disapproved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a negative recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Carson Combs Planner 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 2 Ms. S ay made the motion o approve the Septe ber 21, 2000 minutes 'th amendments: Reg ding Final Develo ent Plan 00-089F - Lexus/Griffith - 849, 3859, & 3885 West Du in-Granville Road ( R 161): Ms. Boring ought Condition 3 d been changed to r d that th a was to be no par ing on Mazcy Drive Dublin Center Driv ,and Stoneridge L e. Ms. C azke said the Co ssion discussed all f the street, and re cting it as along al adjacent . blic streets would pture the discussion Ms. Boring agreed. he said part of the s' a is to be rought into lands a compliance by O tober 16, 2000. M .Newcomb said an pdate and verification will be iven at the next mee ng. Mr. Peplow seco ded the motion wi these corrections, d the vote was as ollows: Mr. ~ Eastep, yes; Mr. ishman, yes; Ms. B ring, yes; Mr. Leckli er, yes; Mr. Sprague yes for Case 3 only, abstained or others; Mr. Peplo ,yes; and Ms. Salay yes. (Approved 7-0. Regazding th revision to the Zo ng Code, Ms. Suso announced a publi input session for October 24, t 7 p.m. at the Recr tion Center. Thep ose is to identify th community values, and she ur d attendance. She aid it had been -pro oted through them ia, letters from the Mayor, po tcazds to 600 reside ts, and flyers posted in public buildings. atio Architects, ou consul will run the meeti .The survey is also osed online at .dublin.oh.us, and it s availabl in the mail by callin the Planning Divisi Mr. klider said the min es of the subcommi ee meeting on the E ternal Residential D sign stand ds September 12, 2 00, did. not require a royal. He announc d the cases would be eard in order of the agenda d the "11 o'clock le." 1. Rezoning 00-0242 -Llewellyn Farms South Cazson Combs presented this rezoning request to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District for 52 lots with 5.14 acres of park. He showed several slides of the area. The 25.8 acres are on the southwest corner of Tuttle and Dublin Roads. ~ Mr. Combs said the proposal has an interior loop road with eyebrows and cul de sacs. This density proposed is 2.03 du/ac. A detention area is located at the corner of Tuttle and Dublin Roads with linear corridors of park winding over to the elementary school site. The site is a flat farm field with a '/4-acre farmstead and an 8,000 square foot barn. Hedgerows are along the school site, the south edge of the property, and directly adjacent to Tuttle Road. Mr. Combs said different park spaces are shown throughout the site, but not all are eligible for a parkland credit under Dublin's policy. The 0.2-acre tot lot is too small, and detention areas cannot be included. The acreage, however, greatly exceeds the Code requirement. It is a very linear corridor, quite unwieldy and hard to maintain. There are also pedestrian connection issues to the school site and linkage to the crosswalk system to Llewellyn Farms park. The minimum lot will be 80 feet wide and 10,400 square feet in area. The minimum sideyards aze six feet and combined sideyards are 14 feet. The rear yards are 25 feet. Lots are proposed facing onto Dublin and Tuttle Roads, to repeat the pattern of the Llewellyn Farms subdivision. They are slightly smaller in size. The setback along Dublin Road is 90 feet, 00-0242 Rezoning i 1._._._11_"_ T______ n___..1_ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 3 consistent with Llewellyn Farms. No-build zones of 20 feet aze proposed along the park. They aze not shown around all openspaces, as standazdly required throughout Dublin. Mr. Combs said Council recently passed an Architectural Diversity Ordinance governing variation of lots within a subdivision. This layout does not provide the vaziation or minimum buildable depth of 65 feet and needs to be revised accordingly. The rights-of--way shown along Tuttle Road and Dublin Road aze 80 feet. The Thoroughfaze Plan shows a 100-foot right-of--way extension for a possible future bridge across the Scioto River. By "buildout" in the year 2040, the traffic level will be more than sufficient to require it. The bridge is not in the five-year CIP, and is projected some time beyond 2020. It is included in the Thoroughfare Plan based on traffic patterns the trip generation studies. He said the Community Plan shows Dublin Road as a scenic road and recommends a setback of 200 feet. The Road to Wow analysis designates this area as River Heritage character and proposes a 100-foot setback. The developer proposes a setback of 90 feet along Dublin Road. Mr. Combs said the developer would also be required to provide a left turn lane into the site. The corner at Tuttle and Dublin Roads may need upgrading also. The interior streets are shown with 50 feet of rights-of--way and 28 feet of pavement, back to back of curb. Cul de sacs standazds are in the text, but no eyebrow standards were provided. Mr. Combs said the park layout is quite problematic. It is not clear if there will be a direct link to the school and park sites. The text does address protection of tree rows somewhat. The plan shows driveways onto Tuttle Road that are not consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan goals. Given the nature of the grading needed for new lots, the treerow will probably be destroyed. Mr. Combs said it is an important feature, and staff requested a new tree survey. Mr. Combs said staff recommends burying the existing overhead utility lines along the roads. The azchitecture for this proposed development will be a variety of materials including brick, stone, wood, stucco, and cementious siding. The asphalt roof shingles will be dimensional. Chimneys will be constructed of brick, masonry, or stucco. Mr. Combs said the land use and density aze consistent with the Community Plan, but the design, layout, and text fail to meet the adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The rezoning is not sensitive to the azea's natural features. Because the general layout is part of the PLR rezoning, he said staff respectfully recommends disapproval of the proposed rezoning with seven bases: 1) The proposed rezoning with the provision of curb cuts along Tuttle Road is not consistent with the adopted Thoroughfare Plan. 2) The proposal has not addressed the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and has not incorporated important natural features. 3) The proposal provides open space that is disjointed, does not clearly link with nearby public resources or provide a clear bikepath system. 4) The proposed rezoning would not adequately address the scenic character established along Dublin Road and does not reflect existing development patterns. 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 4 5) The proposal has not addressed the need for a second access point, consistent with City policy. 6) Stormwater feasibility and infrastructure issues have not been sufficiently addressed. 7) The proposal has not incorporated recently approved changes to the subdivision regulations regarding architectural diversity. Ms. Boring noted the Community Plan recommended density is 1 - 2 du/ac. Without any Wow elements, this is over 2 du/ac, and it does not fit the density policy. Mr. Combs said the Wow program is still not adopted, and the density is subject to Commission discretion. It is very close to the Community Plan. Ms. Boring thought a Community Plan goal was to eliminate developments/houses with curbcuts on Thoroughfare Plan roads. Mr. Combs agreed and said the lots along Tuttle Road do not conform to the Thoroughfare' Plan. Staff does not support them. With shared driveways, the ones along Dublin Road can be supported. He said in the best case scenario there would be openspace along Dublin Road; as a scenic road. He said the Community Plan recommended a 200-foot setback, but the Wow guidelines suggest a 100-foot setback. Ms. Boring said she was surprised about all the flaws she saw in this proposal. Mr. Peplow asked how the proposed lots on Dublin Road compare to those to the north of Tuttle Road. Mr. Combs said the lots located in Llewellyn Farms subdivision are 125 feet in width, with a depth of 200 feet and a 90-foot setback. Ms. Salay noted a conflict between the text and the staff report on the Tuttle Road setback. Mr. Combs said 40 feet is correct, and he did not know the Tuttle Road setback in Llewellyn Farms. Ms. Salay noted the new office building on the corner of Frantz and Tuttle Roads has curb cuts on Tuttle road and a shallow setback. The senior citizens' housing, Llewellyn Farms park, school and the Llewellyn Farms subdivision all have curb cuts. The speed limit is 25 mph. w* Rebuilding the street as afour-lane, boulevarded street will be difficult. She said this is an in-fill development and the last piece. Ms. Salay said she could not see afour-lane thoroughfare. It w.r~ has a sign at the corner of Frantz and Tuttle Roads that says "Thru Traffic Prohibited." Mr. Combs responded that the traffic impact was projected to 2040, or Dublin's estimated "build-out," and this is a needed improvement in the long term. The Community Plan modeled future traffic. There are only a few places that the Scioto River can be crossed. Ms. Salay asked about the bridge site selection. Mr. Combs said in examining Citywide issues, the long term is studied. Today's character may change. Tuttle Road was seen as the best traffic solution through the Community Plan process. Ms. Salay said she thought a bridge at Tuttle Road was not definite. Her children attend Thomas Elementary, and she did not think this was smart. Ms. Clarke said the road widening and bridge are projected "beyond 2020." The children that will be attending Thomas Elementary at that time are not born yet. This is a very weighty decision for the community, and she did not expect it to be undertaken until the need is real. 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 5 Ms. Clarke said a river and a freeway system split Dublin. This makes bridges priority issues. There was concern about the SR 161 bridge being at failure, and by 2020, Hayden Run bridge is also projected at failure. Dublin has to find additional places to cross the river, and Dublin's traffic consultant looked at all the possible roads that provide east/west connectivity. All were . evaluated as potential bridge crossings. Ms. Clarke said the two that made the most sense were specifically tested. There was computer traffic modeling of a bridge at Tuttle Road and one at Memorial Drive. She said she expected both to be highly controversial decisions made at some point a generation from now. Discussions for the newly completed Scioto bridge at Emerald Parkway began in 1980. That bridge seems perfectly normal to us, but the decision on its location was a very difficult thing for this community. Abridge costs over $8M, and nobody undertakes a bridge unless it is really needed. Ms. Clarke said Dublin's land uses and employment volumes indicate that another bridge will be needed at Tuttle Road. She said Tuttle Road connects at the I-270 system, and the I-270 system, even at four lanes, will be at capacity before 20 years. She said the traffic consultant and staff do not expect the widening of Tuttle Road in this area and the bridge construction to be completed before 2020. Ms. Clarke said she did not know what the process would be to move from the rural road to the projected future improvement as afour-lane road with left turn lanes. This is a long-term traffic issue. She said only about six specific traffic improvements listed in the Community Plan were expected not to be done by 2020. The Tuttle Road widening and bridge are on that list. She said the Memorial and Tuttle bridges were pinpointed and specifically tested in the Community Plan. Ms. Salay asked how this would be coordinated with Columbus, which controls the other side of the river. Ms. Clarke said none of this has been discussed. She said Dublin needs the bridge because Dublin is a major employment destination that continues to grow. People need to get to work. Dublin residents also need the mobility of a bridge. She said the bridge would be controversial, no matter which community it is in. She believes any traffic engineer would support it, but it will be a very political decision for the next generation. Mr. Lecklider asked if Dublin has the needed right-of--way between Frantz Road and this site. Ms. Clarke did not know. Several of those projects predate the 1997 Thoroughfare Plan so this is doubtful. However, none of the buildings to the west of this site would conflict with the projected right-of--way. The previous Thoroughfare Plan did not show Tuttle Road as being widened. She said the approval and construction of the I-270 interchange at Tuttle Road really forces a lot of other future traffic improvement decisions, including this projected bridge. Ms. Clarke said some right-of--way was acquired with the Frantz Road intersection improvements. The Preserve development did dedicate the necessary right-of--way and wider setback. Ms. Boring said this is a future decision not tied to this rezoning. Just as was the case at Amberleigh North, nice housing can be planned that does not pre-empt some future traffic decisions. The housing should fit whether or not a bridge is approved in the future. The community needs to look forward. She said the limited curb cuts and wider setbacks would be appropriate in either case. Is should be first class in any case. Ms. Salay said she agreed about the setback. This is a housing subdivision in a developed area. Ms. Boring said this is not the last piece in the area, and the needs of the whole of Dublin should be considered. She said Thomas Elementary may not still be in use in 40 years. 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 6 Ms. Clarke said there are no structures in the way of the projected road to the west of the site. There may be utility boxes. Mostly it is the green setback or parking. In other areas of Dublin, where the setback was minimized by widening the right-of--way, vertical landscape screening generally was installed. [She corrected the record later in the meeting to indicate that there may be homes on the eastern section that would be taken if the right-of--way were widened.] She again noted these decisions will be made long into the future. It will be controversial and a struggle for the community, just as the Emerald Parkway bridge was. If the traffic projections are wrong, that struggle can be avoided. She was certain that traffic will have to escalate to intolerable levels before a bridge is approved and/or programmed. Mr. Lecklider summed up by saying that expanding existing Tuttle Road to four lanes is not r"'~ considered to be a practical impossibility. Ms. Clarke agreed. Ms. Salay asked if three or four lanes would be enough. She thought as many lanes as possible should be built so that this will not have to be repeated. Ms. Clarke responded that the Thoroughfare Plan calls for four through lanes with left turn lanes at appropriate locations. The next update of the Community Plan will reinvestigate the assumptions and evaluate how Dublin is doing compared to the projections. Ms. Salay asked about traffic control at the entry aligning with Bellfield Drive. Mr. Hammersmith thought Tuttle Road would the through road, with stop signs on the side streets. Ms. Salay asked about the single entrance and fire apparatus getting through to the neighborhood. Mr. Combs said staff has requested two entrances, but this can be reconsidered. Ms. Salay said the site plan indicated that the rear yards are to be a minimum of 25 feet and the text requires a no-build zone of 20 feet. Mr. Combs said all lots will have at least a 20-foot no- build zone at the rear. The main structure cannot be closer than 25 feet to the rear lot line. Ms. Salay asked about the forced and funded homeowners' association maintaining the City- owned parkland. Mr. Combs said this is a standard practice and noted that no amenities were proposed, except for a gazebo. He said the school has asked for a pedestrian connection to the +rwr park and the neighborhood. Mr. Lecklider asked about liability for anything that might occur on park property. Who would be responsible, the City or the homeowners. Ben Hale, Jr. said other homeowners' associations carry insurance. Ms. Salay asked about future plans for bikepaths along Dublin Road, south of Old Dublin. Ms. Clarke said it may be a good idea, but nothing is shown on the Community Plan bikeway exhibit south of Old Dublin. The north/south bikeway would be along Frantz Road and there are connections through Llewellyn Farms and through the park, as well as along Tuttle Road. Ms. Salay noted that the proposed setback along Tuttle Road was 40 feet. Mr. Combs said it does not meet Code. The openspace plan needs to be totally reworked, and the setback should be increased. This proposal is inflexible, and this is a basis for the negative recommendation. 00-0242 Rezoning ~ Llewellyn Farms South _ _ . L...._..n~. ~ ~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 7 Mr. Hammersmith said burying existing lines is done as part of a road improvement. Ms. Clazke said any new utility lines have to be extended underground. She noted City Council has an annual fund for utility burial. The next three years of funding will go into other areas. Mr. Combs said there have been four renditions of this proposal, including a condo plan with the . same density and 45 percent openspace. It included a number of Wow elements, and the staff liked it very much. The traffic from a condo is less than from a freestanding house. After discussions with the residents, the applicant wanted to proceed with the single-family plan. Mr. Eastep said this is the ugliest proposal in his two years as a Commissioner. He was shocked it was an Edwards Companies project. The issues are not resolved and he agreed with the staff assessment. This is not ready for Commission consideration. It needs a lot more work aside from the bridge issue, and he cannot vote for it. It is not a Dublin project. Mr. Sprague concurred. Mr. Combs said a few residents' letters were distributed to the Commission. Ben W. Hale; Jr., attorney, said they originally proposed to copy the approved Amberleigh North multi-family project. The neighbors indicated they wanted asingle-family layout with lots fronting Tuttle Road, and this application was filed. He said burying the utility lines should not be the developer's responsibility, but they will bury the interior lines. He agreed to do walkways, etc. to the school and maintain the park. They will put up a split rail fence along the parkland. He said this small number of lots should not require two entrances. Mr. Eastep said he could not support this with only one ingress/egress because of safety issues. Sos Codispoti, Llewellyn Farms, said they are concerned about the future of the neighborhood. He submitted a petition from 200 concerned residents.. He said Llewellyn Farms supports this plan with the homes and curb cuts on Tuttle and Dublin Roads and setbacks comparable to the existing homes. They want continuity. He understood the staff recommendation because Tuttle Road was designated as a Thoroughfare street. He requested plans for the future Tuttle Road bridge and never received them. He noted that the Community Plan is a flexible guide. Mr. Copisdoti gave a PowerPoint presentation. He said commercial curb cuts aze being permitted on Tuttle Road, but residential ones are not. With the setback, he thought it would be impossible to put six lanes at Frantz and Tuttle Roads. Thomas Elementary is a neighborhood school on Tuttle Road with a new raised walkway for the school children. Tuttle Road has a 25 mph speed limit and "No Through Traffic" signs. He said several houses and trees would be destroyed to widen the road. Mr. Codispoti said the residents do not feel Tuttle Road is a thoroughfare street. Abridge at Tuttle Road would not connect to any road on the other side, and Columbus has no plans for widening Riverside Drive. He said there is nothing planned to enhance traffic flow, and this would add to the problem. They want a continuation of Phases 1, 2, and 3 of Llewellyn Farms. Hazold Hanley said he lives on the northwest corner of Dublin and Tuttle Roads. They want to retain the neighborhood integrity and replicate the lots in Llewellyn Farms. Nine homes with curb cuts should face Tuttle Road. The Community Plan has inconsistencies. The Thoroughfare 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission .Minutes -October 19, 2000 ' Page 8 Plan states that Dublin Road is a scenic road requiring 200-foot setbacks, but the Road to Wow recommends 100-foot setbacks. Road widening and a bridge at Tuttle Road ruin the local aesthetics. He asked if Dublin Road would also be widened for turn lanes. He said the Community Plan was affecting the Commission's decision process and is negatively impacting their neighborhood. The Community Plan is to preserve the quality of life. Mr. Hanley said Tuttle Road is a neighborhood street in the middle of Llewellyn Farms. He said it should not be changed after so much of the area has been developed. He said the Thoroughfare Plan and the bridge were not widely publicized until now, and they can badly impact their property values. They will have to disclose this if they sell their homes. He said they support the rezoning. Harry McClure, a 20-year resident, said the children at Thomas Elementary should not be ignored. He said the park represents freedom, relaxation, and family activity, and a thoroughfare would cut off those activities. He has watched the community growth and said many things are undetermined. He would like to see some consistency in how it grows. It would be unfair for Dublin to make this a thoroughfare rather than a residential street. Nelson Carey, a Bridlepath Lane resident, said he recently relocated from the District of Columbia area. They chose Dublin because it seemed to be attractive, scenic, orderly, and well planned. Llewellyn Farms appealed to them because it was quiet with a neighborhood school and a safe park. Llewellyn Farms had quiet streets, both inside the development itself and around it. They left the D.C. area to escape traffic, congestion, and noise, and they do not want a major thoroughfare and bridge near their home. This is not what they expected in Dublin. If in 20 years, Hayden Run and SR 161 bridges are projected to fail, he thought they should be fixed so they do not fail. Widening will ruin the beauty of Dublin Road. He is not anti-growth and endorses this development as it has been submitted. William Moloney, Dublin Road resident, said he favored this subdivision. He was previously told that the bridge was projected, but it would never happen. Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Tuttle Road are completely different streets. Residents should be told what is going to be done about the bridge. Stephen Petty, Monahan Homeowners' Association, said they supported the single-family concept proposed.. They do not support a bridge. They would like the tree line protected on the south edge. They worked very closely with the school to preserve it. He said they would like a path and greenspace along the southern boundary for the children to get to school. Gilbert Godshall, Dublin Road resident, said 11 years ago there was no mall, I-270 exit, or bridge. The Tuttle Mall traffic studies indicated there would be no problem, so a bridge should not be needed. He said several Commissioners already have already decided the issue without hearing the whole story. It upset him to hear Tuttle Road called a thoroughfare when it has a school and park on it. He believes there are other areas to cross over the Scioto River, and this location makes no sense. He hoped the Commission would think about residents, not revenue. Ted Strouff said the 650 Llewellyn Farms residents do not fit into Dublin's vision. He feels Dublin should be proactive in making Tuttle Road more residential. He suggested adding a stop sign at Tuttle Road and Bellfield Drive and adding the nine new driveways on Tuttle Road. He 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South . . Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 9 said Tuttle Road already has high-speed cars that threaten him at his mailbox. Steps should be taken to slow the traffic and maintain safety. Mr. Hale said the neighbors have been steadfast about what they think is right for their neighborhood. For the last two years, their position has not wavered. He said if an easement is provided between lots, they will provide a path to the park. He said there is a difference of opinion between staff and the neighborhood. Mr. Lecklider closed the meeting to public comment. [Most residents began to leave.] He explained this was not a request for them to leave. He apologized for any misunderstandin~* and invited them to stay to heaz comments and the result. Ms. Salay said had issues with the layout and lack of creativity. She thought the density should be lower. Only applications with extra Metro Park donations were approved over two units per acre. She felt 1.7 du/ac would be appropriate. She wanted more than one access and would like comments from the fire and police departments. An alternative such as pavers might be considered. She said this is not a referendum on the bridge, but the whole neighborhood is being held hostage by a bridge 40 years from now. Ms. Salay said the petition and the high turnout at the meeting indicate this is important to the residents. Their concerns need to be addressed. For quality of life, the two-lane Tuttle Road is worth preserving. Ms. Salay said a decision needs to be made now for the community. She thought putting a bridge here and destroying this neighborhood setting was urban sprawl at its worse. She said that is not consistent with her image of Dublin, and she agreed with most of the residents that this needed to be reconsidered. It would cut off this area. She said the residents want to expand their neighborhood. Abridge in this location is wrong for a number of reasons. Mr. Peplow said the density is too high, and he was concerned about having only one access point for emergencies. The parkland layout should provide more useful space. He said the residents raised many good points regarding the bridge and bringing traffic to the azea. He shazed the concern about the school and the road. He said the bridge decision should not be delayed too long, as it has been on the Thoroughfare Plan for some time. He said he supported the community's concerns, but he could not support the plan as he saw it this evening. Mr. Eastep thanked the residents. He said they had done an excellent job and were well prepared. He commended their community on maintaining this type of bond. Mr. Eastep said this is not a review of the bridge. He is reviewing this single-family subdivision, and it needs two point of access. The plan is too dense with few amenities, and it lacks creativity, appropriate greenspace, interconnectivity, and stormwater management. This plan is not a mirror image of Llewellyn Farms; it is a lesser development. He would support a density of 1.5 or 1.8 du/ac. He expected the a widening plan for Tuttle Road would include a tunnel under the road for the children to get to school as has been done elsewhere in Dublin. Mr. Fishman agreed with the other Commissioners. He supported asingle-family subdivision here if that was the best use for the property, but this plan should not be supported anywhere. *As amended by motion at the November 16, 2000 meeting. 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission _ Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 10 The density should be closer to 1.5 du/ac. The standazds in place now are stricter than previously, and the new standazds for bikepaths and open space should apply here. He suggested an imaginative water feature. He said also this was not a bridge issue. This should be the best subdivision possible for the entire City of Dublin. He would vote against this project anywhere. Ms. Boring said single-family use here is supported. Most of this discussion was about the Thoroughfare Plan, and that is a City Council issue. She noted the traffic needs to go somewhere, and the best decision for the community should be made. The next bridge planned is supposed to connect two residential azeas at Memorial Drive. This proposal needs to be much better. She said the road is not being rezoned, they are looking at the plan. She urged the residents to call City Council about the Thoroughfaze Plan. She agreed with the comments of Mr. Fishman and Mr. Eastep and could not support this rezoning. Mr. Sprague was impressed by the intensity of the neighborhood, and said their concerns had been heazd. He said the bridge was not a Commission issue. Llewellyn Farms is a very nice neighborhood, and the residents do not want a development that would threaten their quality of life. Safety of the children was important. He was sure the neighborhood would be satisfied with a plan that meets with the Commission's approval, and it would enhance their neighborhood. Mr. Sprague said he could not vote to approve this development as proposed. Mr. Lecklider said many thoughtful comments were made, and he admired the neighborhood organization. He said Llewellyn Farms was one of the nicest neighborhoods in Dublin. In the past he had supported this neighborhood regarding other issues, including Tuttle Crossing Mall and Marriott's signs. He noted that the neighborhoods do not always support one another. Mr. Lecklider agreed that the Community Plan serves as a guide and needs to be flexible. He said the majority of the Commission feels that way. He said he had the privilege of being on the Commission during the later stages of the consideration of the Community Plan and he voted on it. He agreed that the bridge is ultimately a Council issue. Mr. Lecklider said staff has its professional responsibility, and the staff and Commission do not always agree. Mr. Lecklider agreed with the comments of the other Commissioners on this proposal. He noted that even without curb cuts on Tuttle Road, the houses fronting Tuttle Road should face north.* For any future expansion of the road, the City would ensure the safety of the children. He believed there would be a tunnel at the school. The bridge is not the issue this evening, but it was considered in the Community Plan. He pointed out that the bridge option was maintained at Memorial Drive in a completely residential area. Mr. Lecklider said this subdivision layout had deficiencies. Ms. Boring advised the residents to make their presentations at City Council. She said whatever the vote is tonight, the applicant can still take it to Council for the final decision. Mr. Hale said the layout has been driven by the residents. He understood the sentiments of the Commission to remove the curb cuts on Tuttle Road, etc. The neighbors will not support the plan without the curb cuts, and they want to take this plan to City Council for a vote. Mr. Hale *As amended by motion at the November 16, 2000 meeting. 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -October 19, 2000 Page 11 said he was present during the Road to Wow process and has said openly that it was a really good idea that is going to make Dublin a better place. Mark Martin, a Rings Road resident, said he admired the Road to Wow and the architectural plans for the outlying areas. It should not apply to an in-fill project. This should blend with Llewellyn Farms. He said he wanted something comparable to be built. Mr. Fishman said usually the neighbors want more expensive homes, not comparable ones. Mr. Eastep made a motion for disapproval on this rezoning application because it is not consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, does not address the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, has not incorporated the natural features, needs a better open space plan with bikepath connections, and does not address the scenic character of Dublin Road and the development patterns of the area, does not provide a second access point, needs more infrastructure information and does not incorporate recently approved changes to the subdivision regulations regarding architectural diversity. Mr. Fishman seconded the motion for disapproval, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes and asked that the minutes reflect his support for the neighborhood; Ms. Salay, yes and asked that the minutes reflect her support for the neighborhood; Mr. Fishman, yes and dittoed Mr. Peplow and Ms. Salay; Mr. Eastep, yes. (Disapproved 7-0.) Mr. Lecklider called a short break. Ms. Clarke said she talked to one of the residents about structures that might impede the widening of Tuttle Road or the bridge during the break. She said she must have misspoken earlier when she said no structures would need to be taken for road widening. This may not be true as the homes on the north side of the road may be in the way. The alignment is not fixed, and homes might be taken for that widening. She wanted the record to be correct. 2. velopment Plan 00 94DP -Thomas- hler PCD, Subare A - Parkwood W t 615, 5665, and 5715 arkwood Place W en Campbell prese ed this development an for three office b 'dings in Subarea A o the omas-Kohler PCD. he whole PCD enco asses 111 acres. Th maximum building d nsity this subarea is 18,0 square feet per acre and the maximum he' ht is 80 feet. The pe fitted uses for this subarea ' clude hotels, offices nd institutional uses. e showed several sli es. The 16-acre site i bounded by Emerald arkway, Woerner-T ple Road and Park od Place. A tree row runs orth/south through th center of the site, an a second tree row ru s across its northern end. a majority of the tre row will be preserve He said about 781 aliper inches of "protected" rees will be removed nd replaced accordin to the tree preservatio plan. Mr. Campb 1 said three nearly id tical three-story buil ngs are proposed, na ed Emerald 4, 5, and 6. h building has an ac ent pond for visual ancement, and a st water retention pond is p oposed at the souther end of the site. The roposal would split t is parcel into three lots. H said there is a righ in/right out access o Emerald Parkway ~ rhPre arP r.un nn Parkw Place that align w' the Parkwood 1 and buildings. Emec 00-0242 Rezoning Llewellyn Farms South i 0 ohm w i w ~~o OC a ~ ~ ~ ~ F._ ti~ w 0 d ~ z~ o~ ow U ~ A ~ ~ ~ pi x;o T ^ r1 ~ ~ ~ Q G1 UAW W V 1 I~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ o v W ~ z ~ ~ N ~--i O V] ~ . vVi O ~ A-1 0 p O ~ ~ O N ~ U o~Ao ~ Cci ~ W w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a W ~ ~ ~a~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q Q~U ov A www~ d ~ ~ w U Z ~ ~~~z w ~UUa~ a z o~ a ~~~c4 ~ ~-o °U~ ~ z o~ ~ ~ x~~ ~o w~, s~° w ~ z~o~~~ z A^ h~'~ ~ ~ zo~~ W w w°~~~° ~ ~~3~ U W M-~-~ ~1 . ~ , i~..,..~_ .~ri o., oA a ~ O ~ x ~ l ~ o N o W 'd O y~ N -o N U ~ ~ ~ v ~ o z a Y ~ ~ A w a o d~ a ~ x a~ W w I--1 ~ H o ~ h~ 7 , ~ a ~ s~ ~ a r p I ~ I ' ' I ? j : ~~~o ~ J SCIOTO ~~R ~ ~ o p~ ~ e -__f - 1° ~ ~UgLINROAD .o ~ ° _ o 0 .i ~ ~ ° , ~ -v ~ ~ - H ~ ~ o Q o _ ~ _ o jam' ~ Y ~ ~ _ _ d m g~ ~ p ' - ~ ~ ° f s ~o ~ ,,I _ e ~o ~ NTZ goo ~ o'_ p p O 1 o i i ~ got o0 000 ~ ~ ~ H ~o~3po ° i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o _ o i ~ ? 0 - co - o D Oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o e - e ~ p ~`~hQC U e°~ _ o0 0~ _ _ - I ~oooo~ - o ° 0 O ~ l,~_ ooe _270 ~ _oi i _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o _ ? , = I G ~ 1~. C / ~ n - ~~p I ~ ~Q r1 - r--- 4..11 _-'r .rs.. / .n ll 4r ri i Y........:..~,-~i ~ r~rr _ _ ~ a.~~.~...,,..,.w.=.m _ s q ~ ~ ~aq u M ~ ~ a ~ s~ ~q~~ ~ ~ 'b a ~ 00 ~ ~ v o.9 s 'O g 3' a ~ 1~+ O ~ s~ W ~ ~ A ao'rs" rn ~ W ~ ~~.~a ~:~sa a~o~a H ~ c ~ ~ o api ~ O a as z~~~~ 4 ~ r- ~ o 0 0 ~ a ~ c~ c~ H a C~J F A O O Zj e ai ~ L1 ui u.; C ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o g' o Q „ m ~ _ 'w b~ O 'd . / ~ ~n U I I - - v I 1 a ;II II ~ _ - _ I ~ I 1 i I q°I I I i i3s gl 1 ~ R ~ I I _ I~~~~~ 1\ 1~ I I _ I I iza ~ _ I~\ I ( ~ J I ~ 1~ + ~ ~ V ~ -1-t ~V~~ ~ ~ ~~,;c c°. ~ ~ ~ - ~ it AI / _ - ~ ! uKo ew~~z~me ~ ~ ~ - I l - - - A 20'No ~~Zu - / la 1 - ~ ~ k, ~ ~ ] ~ ~ I: 5+1` 100' ~ ~ b I 1 I i - ~ I -'Ir ioa ~ \ ~l m ~ \S - S9 \ I - ~ m ~ I ~ ~~~v ~ ~ 'ha IMES NE ~ ~ ~ t ~ o - ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ' ' 1 ~ ~ - 1 -ti - -g 1 1 ~ 1 C ~ ~A ~ -'a h z,. - ~ i---~_ ~:~x. 1 ~ 1 1 ~ . , ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ b ~ ~ \ ~0. T ~ ~ 2o~N Bwld2~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M~ I ~ I -~I~ . z0 No Build Zonc ~ y ~ [ ~ 1 1 y~ \ ~ x a o I ~ 1 ti b 8 Z 4 , ~J Q U ~ 1: q4__J ~ F.~ a ~ y7., Q'i ~ ! ~ mot' 1 l . 1 ~ 1-a~ ~ W IU M Q J 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ a '1~ F~ 1 ~ ~ ~z. ~ 1 J ~ / I b: _ 'ti % ~ ~ `,1 ~ Fc v I 1 I 11 IP~ 1 ' p ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I~ I~F W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 MI / 191 j 1 ~ F I i _ \ / 1~ [B l \I to m 1 1 ,1 ~ i` l I i I ~ y ~ti ~ , - ~ / ~ I T~ `l 4 ~ o ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ cwi A ~ I' 1 ' ' 1 1 I ya s~ ~ a q ~ ~a ~ 1 II~ r ~b Fes' ~ '1 u _ _ r u~~ a ~ _ _ - b ~ ~ ~ s o ~ 8 g^+ U ~ E o ~ Ad ~ ~ ~ a~ a~~ ~ ~9 ~ ni ~ ~ ~ ~ 3i Cd ~ ~ m C/] F-1 0 ~ ~d >9" y4 ~~o ~a c~ O p is o ~ ~ y q v o ~ ~o ~ `x'•30 rviJ ~ ~ ~ tiD'ti ^v ~ g ~ ~ba ~ ~ O ~ ~ A O w .5 ~ 8 ~u b ~ (}~o~yyUp ~ ~ Q ~ .x 0.ir s ~ S ~ ~'o ~ ~ 9 ~ P4 w/ a ~ ~ ~ v' ~ b Z m u N 6 N ~"rl ~ a~~ 8 ~•8 0 0 0 }0, ~ n, ~ o~ l ~ co 0 0.i ~i W W ~ V] > r+ d ~ v ¢ ~ a [ • ~ W ^ F f..~ ~ F-i fV ni O vi G l~ ~I•~ ~1~~• ~ r _ -~9-1~ B- ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~I , ~ II ~ ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a , ' ~ i 1-r ~ ~ a O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J /1 ~ ~ ~ , i ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i ~ ~ N~ i ~ -r o , , ~ a - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ z ~ ~ -~J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F» ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~z ~ i wH~ ~ ~ Na © , , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r l~ , ' O-- ~ ~y ~ _ ~ ~l -c ; ~ , ; `r ~ ; ii~_ , ~ ~ ~ , o r ~ i I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ , I rru^~ l ~ ~ b ~1 ~ ~ d ~ O ~ _ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ w O~ W ~ O U ~d N $ ~ ~ Fr-1 ~ . ~ ~ v ~ roe" h a ~ ~ ~ W l~ ~ a r T~, ~ , cv C'e ; c~ ~ F a.. Q - ~ a ~gu ~ ~ a 5~ ~ A' ~ ~ q ~ ~ c a ~ H .a ~ s .c :a ai A w ~ ~ > ~ ~ o ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wa ~ ~ ~ a.~ ~ ~ o 8 0 ~~•g ~ c co 8 ,n a ~ a ~aa ~ 3 o c o y ~ a° ~ ~ '~c. F s O ~ q~ ~ ~ a d C4 ea ~ .o ~ .y .3 0 ~ sa `d 9 ~ ~ a &U ~ ~ > ~ Z w ~ ¢ ~ H ~ C ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'c o u o .'Vl' c< < o 'r'te .,tJ~lr ~ . 4 ~ r ~ . ~ 0i ~ It `~-7~ ~'~~h~ \ ~ a ~ 4 d Q ' ~ ~ J' ~ r _ err ' J ,qi e ~ "C.9' ~ V] . yes ' • i~~ ' ~ ~ fi, N 3 r `y U ~ y 1L X0.1. ~ 1 F' ~ , 3~ ~ g E ~3 ' ~ ~ u r ~S i ~ ~ .i J u ¢ H o~ H W ~ ~ g W - z z o O O - ~ ~ A ' ~ A ~ ~ ~ O ~ O o ~ f 1~ ~ ~ k F.L~ ~ , t ~ ~1 . _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ t H A Q orHO `rvnena ~ a i ad02! Ni~B!)0 ~8 ab021 37.L1fll o Z I Hl nos sw~d~ rv,~ ~~~M~» o_ ~ n ~ F s~~N.dRO~ Nd~d son`-ow mi o ~ ~ NOLLdIN~530 A9 31V~ aaniuo~ B°" lB N011 b'/1 ~J~S~~Jd ~~cyl ~ 3 ~ o ~ a SNOISIA3?1 ~a~ s a 0 z a U ~ O O ~ O U1 Q ~ ~ 300 ~ o w a ~ ~=~0~03 yp~.W.l ~2U ~ R ~ ~ ~O W 24 WWkZUO~OYUaY¢ ~ (nd W=OOWO~Q VO QQy Q- /a ~I G-~1 ~ ~s w ¢amc~ooooi„==~~0033 ~ II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II ~~~~,PJ x ~ n ~ d "9 I W d aamc=~~c>oowx=~~ocn33 ~ c5 ' J ~ R O _ / _ U ~ ~ z Q / W ~ - - ~~R/ I i ¢ ; / lam- _ `J ~ / o ~ - - - Q/ ~ ~ ----~~i -tea i ~ a ~ ~ - - Rr J / / / _ - / ~ - - ww ~ ~ - I ~ - ~ I m l l a>1 I 83 / II 1 ~ ~1 I I ~ r ~ \ ~L -rJ~x~ - cD r. _ _ _ / ~ I , I / / F' / ~ ~ 1 11 ~ ~ s~ NW~^ \ / / ~ / (O .6 nee ( J (O C I. Imo! ' \ '1 r ZW 9 ~ ~ - fi ~ Let). x" / / ( \ ( LLW % I p F / _ I N ~ i \ Q Loz) \ * ~ - , I ~ , 1 W N 1 1 ~ O m O ~ / L ~n ''1~I y(es) /,m o \ \ II Z / ems` Bl / i! F W N \ I ~ \ \ x I ~ 1 \ R / \ N ( 1 1 1 ~ R m / I NI J a / ' II~~ C~~yj~} I (D ~r1\ \ 1 11 ChB - I W~a11 11 M ~11i '~j _ ~ I A } ~ v ~ . ro\ ~ rJ t~ ~ / I ~ ~ 1 r ~ \ rn r I ~ ~ ~ f-~~~r~ i 1 ,'rw~` x,11 ,ym ~ 1 r^ / \ ~ ° r / l \ \1 . 1 ~ 111 °v' ° - 1 J/ j ~ I, 1 N ~ 1 1 1 / \ a ~ ~ 11. 1 1 \ 4 11 _ ~ O ~ ` 11'1 1111 , , / 1 1 - r7 / a _ r - ~ - - - 1'; 1 . i - 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ \ ' t1 ' 1 v i/ / \l/ 1 11 ~ ~ ~ _ 1 1 oQ~ s 111 11~ ~ r \ t ~ s 8 ~ ~ 11 / 1 1'1. ~ 1 mow 11 0 \ 1~1 i a ~ V ~O~ 111 o 111 J 3 ~ o~ ,o Y ` o~o 111155'1 m~~~ i / 1 \ `m c ~ \ Oro \ 11 III 1 \ ~ v c \ ~ o 0 0 0 i / / J ! \ --~~Q~-tOy \ \ \ 1 1 11 ~ ~ °iE `"w-0030 ~.Q~pj a0J d}S~ 111 N z 1~ ~L Ed.NO sN ONO mZ \ 1 J Y~ D o Orn o O D U1 2 a 17 J r ~ m ~ 1 I O 11 1 I~, ~ ~ I 11 1 1 ~ Q , 1 ) \ 1 \ 1 J ! 1111 I \ / 'aul 'saluodwo~ 3-N lo} wo ai~zo~a o ~ooz/s~/ro ~o a3iruodo ~a 6.wP'S38d33ffi\6MP\OIKS6\4aa(oad I. OIHO 'N1~8(1a ~ ~ Ob021 NIlB!)0 ~8 Ob021 3111.11 o Z s o H1110S SW~Jt/~ N.l ~~3M.3~~ o ao~~ SaiN.aROa _ Z'i><3008Y-BLB-Yl9 ~ ~ z ~ O o NOLLdIiYJ53U A8 31v0 ~T'M~ ,,wq~1O~ a ~ a x z SNOISU321 ~ .ll I ~Il n .l ~ b'NI W I ~.~~d o 3 ~ o ~ a s w ~ Yil ¢ o U in .V. ~ ~ a a~ ~ J ~ ~ -ice / ~ \ I /2Z' \J yam---• - ~~n rna~ / ~t} ~ _ / _ 2 O ~ L-__-_r-_-- _ _ i _ _ _ - ~ i , \ \ J '~11, I I I t----836 ~ \i J I I i ~ I I 1 -'-__I I tL - ~ ~ .1 I I i I \ / ~ \z - \ ' \ i ~ \ 6• W'~ ~ I \ 3 ~ /mil \I ~ 1 . h ~ ~ / 1 \ ~ ~ ~ 11 ---~'C~roo s \ / \ I ~ 111 , 11 _ ~ ~ N / 9~\` / ~ 1 1 ~ I l A Al ~ / \ _ ~ Q `rte 11 J- _ ~ ~ I ~ \ y ~ ~ \ ? e~ ~ ~ 1 coo r~\ \ ~ 1 -\\O ~ I ~ h 3 1 M i + m Ire ) ~ J) ` ~ \ Tg r ~ ~ v .pF 24 ST. 1 / \I J ~ \ 6• Y V ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I m I / ~ \ N ~ '1~ II t Y / g~ ~ Il 1 1 I ~ \ / ~ I yoc I ~ X11 \ i ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I a y / a ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ N I`I'1 Q~ ~ , 111\411 1\ 11 ~ 1 O o ~ ~ 11 1 J ~ 11, \ ~ 111 I, ~ a ~J ~ 1 11'1 11 ~ ~ ~ 41111 N N / 1 ~ i _ z~ 1 Ldr ~ 1 t = ry o m ~ \ WUQ \ 1~y j \ ono \ 11 ~ ca~i ~'mvtoc.`~° J I Y oo+o a°~nar~ ~r \ m ~ \I m ~ m l o mov 1 3%~~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 \ / I ~ 1 \ 1 w ~ ~ I J I I 1111 I J / I Iil I \ / ~ 1' 111 \ \ 1 r 11 1 111 \ ! 1 1 ~ 1 I' 'I ' 1 t\ 1\ I 11\\ ~ r •~~"od~„o~ 3-L~ ,o; _ w" so~wo~ ®Looz/ai/ao "o a~ruodo Fa 6Ma~unnn3ad\b~o\o arse\~i~a~d . 'v . ' i s ~ • r..~ _.-..r1 a..~.~~ CS-1 Rev. 4/9/92 Page 1 of 4 NAME OF STREET: Rings Road ORDINANCE NUMBER: 52-00 ROUTE NUMBER: IR270 DATE: March 20 , 2000 An emergency ordinance enacted by the City of Dublin, Franklin County, Ohio, in the matter of the hereinafter described improvement and to request cooperation by the Director of Transportation. WHEREAS, the State has identified the need for and proposes the improvement of a portion of the public highway which is described as follows: Replacement of existing deck and widening of the structure including bikeway and sidewalk on a new alignment. Raise bridge to provide required vertical clearance. Structure Location: Structure FRA-270-1619 (Rings Road over IR270). This legislation repeals Ordinance Number 50-97 passed May 5, 1997. said portion of highway within the municipal corporation limits being hereinafter referred to as the improvement, and WHEREAS, the Director of Transportation further desires cooperation from the City in the planning, design and construction of said improvement. NOW THEREFORE, Be it ordained by the Council of the City of Dublin, Ohio: SECTION I, (Cooperation) That said Director of Transportation hereby requests the cooperation of the City in the cost of the above described improvement as follows: The City agrees to assume and bear one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of preliminary engineering (environmental studies and detail design) and right~f--way. The Ohio Department of Transportation agrees to provide a lump sum of 5750,000 of the total construction cost. The City shall provide the balance of the construction cost. SECTION II, (Consent) That it is declared to be in the public interest that the consent of said City be and such consent is hereby given to the Director of Transportation to construct the above described improvement, in accordance with plans, specifications and estimates as approved by the Director. SECTION III, (Authority to sign) That the City Manager of said City, is hereby empowered and directed on behalf of the City to enter into agreements with the Director of Transportation necessary to complete the planning and construction of this improvement. ~ _ . CS-1 Rev. 4/9/92 Page 2 of 4 SECTION IV, (Traffic Control Signals and Devices) That traffic control devices installed within the limits of the project will conform with Section 4511 of the Ohio Revised Code. SECTION V, (Maintenance and Parking) That upon completion of said improvement, said City, will thereafter, for all portions for which it is responsible, keep said highway open to traffic at all times, and (a) Maintain the improvement in accordance with the provisions of statutes relating thereto and make ample financial and other provisions for such maintenance; and (b) Maintain the right-of--way and keep it free of obstructions in a manner satisfactory to the State of Ohio and hold said right~f--way inviolate for public highway purposes and permit no signs, posters, billboards, roadside stands or other private installations within the right-of--way limits; and (c) Place and maintain all traffic control devices conforming to the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices on the improvement in compliance with the provisions of Section 4511.11 and related sections of the Ohio Revised Code. (d) Regulate parking in the following manner: prohibit parking in accordance with section 4511.66 of the Ohio Revised Code, unless otherwise controlled by local ordinance or resolution. SECTION VI, (Right-of--Way, Utility Rearrangement and Damage and Liability Responsibilities) (a) That all existing street and public way right-of--way within the City which is necessary for the aforesaid improvement, shall be made available therefore. (b) That the State will acquire any additional right-of--way required for the construction of the aforesaid improvement. (c) That arrangements have been or will be made with and agreements obtained from all public utility companies whose lines or structures will be affected by the said improvement and said companies have agreed to make any and all necessary plant removals or rearrangements in such a manner as to be clear of any construction called for by the plans of said improvement and said companies have agreed to make such necessary rearrangements immediately after notification by said City or the Department of Transportation. (d) That it is hereby agreed that the City shall at its own expense, make all rearrangements of water mains, service lines, fire hydrants, valve boxes, sanitary sewer or other municipally owned utilities and/or any appurtenances thereto, which do not comply with the provisions of We Ohio Department of Transportation Utilities Manual inside or outside the corporate limits as may be necessary to conform to the said improvement and CS-1 Rev. 4/9/92 Page 3 of 4 said rearrangement shall be done at such time as requested by the Department of Transportation Engineer. (e) That the construction, reconstruction, and/or rearrangement of both publicly and privately owned utilities, referred to in subsections (c) -and (d) above, shall be done in such a manner as not to interfere unduly with the operation of the contractor constructing the improvement and all backfilling of trenches made necessary by such utility rearrangements shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of the Ohio Department of Transportation Construction and Material Specifications and shall be subject to approval by the State. (f) That the installation of all utility facilities on the right-of--way shall conform with the requirements of Title 23 CFR 645 Subpart B Utility Relocation and Adjustment and the Department of Transportation's Utilities Manual. (g) That the City hereby agrees to accept responsibility for any and all damages or claims for which it is legally liable arising from the negligence of its officers, employees or agents in the performance of the City's obligation made or agreed to in sections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) hereinabove. Likewise, The State agrees to accept responsibility for any and all damages or claims for which it is legally liable arising from the negligence of its officers, employees or agents in the performance of the State's obligations made or agreed to in sections (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) hereinabove. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure by reason of the need for expediting highway improvements to promote highway safety, and provided it receives the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members elected to Council, it shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage and approval by the mayor; otherwise, it shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. ~Ooo Passed; a !'f.L, ~ Q , Attest: L./i~~12.wE- Clerk Mayor Attest: President of Council _ ~ ~ ,e. ,.~..d CS-1 Rev. 4/9/92 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF COPY State of Ohio City of Dublin ss County of Franklin I, ;;~'yl h C.~ ~ ~G r~ , as Clerk of the City of Dublin, Ohio, do hereby certify that the fords a true and correct copy of ordinance adopted by the legislative Authority of the said City on the day of,~ i~ „~,ZGV that the publications of such ordinance has been made and certified of rewrd according to law; that no proceedings looking to a referendum upon such ordinance have been taken; and that such ordinance and certificate of publication thereof are of record in Ordinance Record No.S~ ~ ,Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my official seal, this .S7 day of pry ,~9~~v (seal) Clerk City of Dublin, Ohio. The foregoing is accepted as a basis for proceeding with the improvement herein described. For the City of Dublin, Ohio. i ~ ~d~ 1'dl~~~i~i,~ Attest: ~ rL ' ~ ' ~L ~ ~[~L1N,, '3 It pl1 Contractual r For the State of Ohio Attest: ,Date Director, Ohio Department of Transportation