Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout49-00 Ordinance _ _ a _ RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No 004 Ordinance No.49-00 Passed AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR 4.93 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WEST DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD (SR 161) AND DUBLIN CENTER DRIVE, FROM: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND SO, SUBURBAN OFFICE DISTRICTS, TO: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. (LEXUS/GRIFFITH PROPERTY - 3849, 3859, AND 3885 WEST DUBLIN-GRANVILLE ROAD -CASE FILE NO.00-028Z). NOW, TREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit A) situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, - Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Pass this day of 00. or -Presiding Officer Attest: Clerk of Council Sponsor: Planning Division Pbe?eby certify that copies of this Ordinance/'Resolution were posted n the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the Ohio Revised oda. G?,a~;Qerl f ~ouncit, Dublin, Ohio I Ij 1, ~y fttING BANNA ~~'s DR KAY ' ' G/I~HIBIT I 1 Ii ~ ~o v~ ~ S I ~ ~ i i SA1fHURY BLVD I ~ BRIGHT RD ~ ~ ~ r ' ~ ~ I 1 ~ 1 < BIUANGSLISY RD . ~ ; ~ ~ ~A 1~ TULLER RD TUU.ER RD axoirf~ ~ D SITE ~ ~ , ~ 57 DALE DR a 1 Ir..,~'c, i~ A vim! FED ~soa'~ I I ~~'ED LT'D ~ 1 -yS J ~r I (~I ~ A • ~ U i4.> 161 sA1?1QI1. p~Ca I hdoa ' ; HEST DUBLiN DR t r j GRANVf1.i.E RD ~ ~ ~ y ~ P4 E PL LILLY-MAR CT ~ =1 ~ f~~, I~'v RAX1fAR BY.Ok"t I ~~~..~aaj L 'rv i • ~ 3fARTIN RD ~ 6~ " ~ ~ ~ MARTIN RD a f r I ~ I j I a f a D AV ~ ~ / 33 ~ • A ~ A f b ~ .~~ER Q E G~Ex ~ . 1 ~ ; ~ E 6 ~v~ i ~ DR 00-0282 ~ ~~N ~ L Rezoning Application ~ Lexis/Griffith , r,~., 1 ~ ~ . _ ~ ESSIGNTON p~ C` CC CC LER Rn l~ l! R-1 PCD CC V c CC R ' S7 R-1 C ALE R ~ ~ cz ~ -i 1. \ C A ~ CC ~ P { , , of 1 BivD i 'Gi ~ a iu; I .:.C 7 CC i ~ ~ 1 1 CC SAWMILL P ~ I ~ 4 ~ E !j R-4 1 I P P i D UD D1 ,s xD ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ J ~j ~ ~ A w o ~ _ E GR EK R~ ~ E ~ ~``'s`1'oN O ® ~ KAYS AVE OHIO ® DONS 00_02gZ ~ Rezoning Application ~ C ~ L U M B (Lexis/Griffith aF .v.. ~ Ps R~EZONI ExPIRE fl'I'Y OF lll~Ll~l\ Ordinance No. 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 PhonelTDD: 614/761-6550 City Council 1st Reading y,~ ~ O Fax: 614,x761-6566 City Council Public Hearing .r.. City Council Action FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ? Amount Received: Application No: P&Z Date(s): P&Z Acticn: s ,oo -l2-DO r=,aceipt No: MIS Fee No: Cate Received: ~ Received By: ;~pe of Rcciuest: i LJ PL"^,SE SUBh1iT TV'JO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARI7_ED APPLICATIONS - P[a;:~~l: PRIG"I - ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION and CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION ? Composite Plan(Code Section 153.058) Preliminary Development Plan (Code Section 153.056) ? Other (Ccscnbe) - i. P,OPERTY INFORMATION II I T ~X ID NO/ Parcel Sipe: + CISTRICTPARCELNO: See attached Schedule I ~A``~`~) II 1 r,rr~t•~~r!; A~Idr~~ss ~ See attached Schedule I i i~ rty i_~c,ltlc^~: See attached Schedule I j s~:i~• ~a street. (N. s. E. w) See attached Schedule I ~ i'-- i ~ ~J~~ar~•st intc~r.;eraim: See attached Schedule I ~ I Cc:Luu:~~ from N~~,~rr~st Intersection: Schedule I t. L'J from N~~arr~st Intersection _r it - - ~ I ~~;~a\ tist,ny Lan~1 Use/D~?velopmcnt ~ See attached ~ ~ ~Q C?_ ` ~:r~i L rr-:1 L!_;r;o~,,,,,i~~(~n-~~nr I'~ iI x r - 20~~ ~i ~ ~ : • See attached ~ t' , .;r!~r,~i ;11;I iii ~I:cn .~'a, \r~J{.~3~Lai%. ~ ~T\t- ~ tPt_'T T'~3 L `Ji _i-~`i ~ ~ ~ ` y~, EXHIBIT "B" ` Current or Existing Zoning Distrct: Requested Zoning District: No. of Acres to be Rezoned: See Schedule I PUD See Schedule I STATEMENT: State briefly how the proposed zeniny and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinihj. Proposed zoning is consistent with existing zoning of neighboring property, allows future use consistent with surrounding uses, and conforms with the Dublin Corridor Development District. ..u STATEMENT: State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan. The Dublin Community Plan identifies this area of Dublin as a gateway to the community suitable for commercial/retail land uses consistent with the existing land use and development of the Germain Properties of Columbus property and surrounding properties. This Application will conform the I Griffith properties to that Plan. PREVIOUS APPLICATION? Fin .n appl~~ati:;n fir rezoning the property hec n rir~nied by the City Council within the last hvo (2) years? YES ? NO ~ - ! j IF YES, b^JHEN? I~ Ctate th~~ bads of r~-r;cnsi~lr~ration: N/A I 'M"F.,~, I j If IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS CG(LIPOSITE OR PRELIMINARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES ~ NO ? I' I IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOP^JIENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES ® NO ? III ~ ~ II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOIVING: C Q 13 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ ~G h ~ 1..~' ` Leg,il dusciiplion of th~~ property to bu rezoned consists ct 7) p,jy~,~ti~, (Grif f 1%lfl 4 p2:G,~eti/GerIilaln 3 pages ) PLAN REQI!IREMENTS: i5 LS ? ld SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24" X ze") SHOWING: 1 ~ a_ Th, ite rnd .ill Lind X00 f~ ut be?ycnd th~^ hound irirs ij ~ h rth ,rr w .irnl b +r c il~~ j I ~ E ~i lire! n hti~~r: (r3^.ui:. huildln~t ~~~_p~Lrfiim trp~ yrq~hy lursifirlir~n it hrund.ui~~s. u' i~i ~ ) , r _ l ~1 f i, I ~ :;~tif U i(~, n,rl Ir rnnp~xt ilia n ~:ystrm. ~I,~r iti~ s. ,r ~~1 dw~~llu,,y: hud~iin }Lnit h,l fly, u. ft5~'~t,'rq p,iif.l un.~'rhrn I~.u~:~. ~1~• f F-~irain~t in~l pro 1~~~~.~~~1 : ~:nuul ~fiaricl I~oun~l.~n~~~ i rL F',~vr~nu t ,11.I,Lc~iti~~n `:Pl~^ iCBt'C- r-n I'.r'r ,i ~ E t ~ Y: ~ ..«~...s..~:a-...may---~=r-~.~.~ _ ~ ~IMlt~:f,. E~CHi81T "E" f. Size of the site in acres/square feet; and g. All property lines, street rights-cf-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the prcpesed boundaries. 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11" X 17") ? 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/." X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20") Showing contiguous property owners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. III. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY Ob'VNERS List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. PROPERTY OWNER (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE2IP CODE ~XH t8t`t' D See attached Schedule II II I I I I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ i i 'l r-- i ,m~ i ' -o a$~ ~ 1 i_ _ - - ---~J ~ "Oil' ~ h L_ - ~ ~ j ~V. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ~ 5~W ~V Name of Current Property Owner(sl: Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc. NlailingAddress: 5777 Scarborough Blvd. (Street, City; State, Zip Code) Columbus, Ohio 43232 Daytime Telephone: Fax: 614-793-1990 614--793-7450 Name of Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): 'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. J . Thomas Mason, Esq. D:1ailing Address: Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (street. City. state. Zip Code) 52 East Gay Street, Columbus, OH 43215 Daytime Telephono: Fax- 614/464-5446 614/464-6350 I ~hich of the above is the primary a;ntact person? J. Thomas Mason L V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Sire visits to the propery/ are necessary by Cih/ representatives In order to prcc~ss this application. The Owmer.'hl~plicant hereby auihoriz s Cit; repn~sentatives to visit, photettraph and post a notice on the property described in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER Thr. City of Dublin evil) make evr.ry effort to provide essrrttial services to the preperhy as needed. However. tha rapid growth of the City cf CuLlin and ncrN ~r.rst Franklin Court/ has stretchrti rh Citys capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the Cihy of Dublin may be unable tc make all or part of aai~i fa,~!'ut~c., evadable to Ih~~ applicant ur;il ;;ome future date. The AppllranGCwner hcrc'tiy acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by rh~e ub in Fl~mnin~i ~rnd ~ur;iny Commi_;_ ion .inrl!nr Lublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or bindin_rt ccmmitm~ant that the Clty of Cubin will he a l~~• Ic prcei~+ rsscntial sen,ia~s such ,is w;rtcr and sewer facilities when needed b~~yffsa~~id Applicant. /~~j VII. OWNEH AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE Olt~/U~/e r{GL`l'l~l,/rI2~ ~D~ - - _ of Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., i. Richard B t'PY'Tnr"3l n, the authorized arc ent tho owner vx1~aE?I:I~~r„ant, herr t~r ~~uth;~ri: _ co- J. Thomas Mason Io .r.a as my tr.prt~sE~r ttUvr~ and .ry~~nt in all mat's r pertaining to thr Irr.cr.s ~''7 and approval „t if s ::I y li~~atk,n including mr,~Gi,9n~t the pro, nt >+rd I r.iu~e~ to be bound by ali rc pn._,r:nLilicns and ,rgrnemr nls made by the do Suinat< d ~u~c~nt. Signatur went Property Owner. GeYmdln Properties Of COl \}JUS , nC „ Date: By: Ttst%~~~ 2000 ignc~ture of Current Property Owner: Dale: ~ r ~a ' r' iJ , VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT , ~ b~--~G~ t;~~;;:..ar;~l:~l l li~;,~ti; n I PLA-iC8 D,rb~O^~~:';,9% ~e ti~l E.~y • ~n E~HI~iT "B" STATE OF Ohio COUNTY OF Franklin of Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., I, Richard B Germain R the authorized went . tfZe~plicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the ccntents of this applicaticn. The information contained in this application; attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. ' n Pro erties of Columbus , Inc . Date: Signature of Applicant or p Authorized Representative: \ A~ ~ a, , 2000 By. Its: V pp subscribed and sworn to before me this day of C/ 2000 nom.. Notary Public `aaamnuuxi ``2o~Pp1Al 3F'l J. THEODORE SMITH, ATTORNEYAT LAW noawr~uc,snu~oi:ateo My commiasba has no expi~adoe date. s o Section 141.03 R.C. Tql~ OF O~` °jgimnrniuu~U~ s~.,.» I 1 li•'' Ic' ~ tJ I ~ i i I ~ _____r._ 00 2GJ0 I - - ~~LE C~ . ~ . ~ ir, f ~ r~~_~ _ _ . , ~ 3 SCHEDULE I REZONING APPLICATION Property Information I. Property information Griffith Properties 273-008275 273-008276 273-008278 Total Acreage: 2.341 ± acres Address: 3849 and 3859 Dublin-Granville Road. Location: Located East of the Scioto River and West of Sawmill Road. Side of Street: Located South of Dublin-Granville Road. Nearest Intersection: Dublin-Granville Road and Dublin Center Drive. Distance from Nearest Intersection: Approximately 240' to 480' East from Nearest Intersection Existing land use/development: Veterinary Hospital and Health Food Store Proposed land use/development: Expansion of existing Lexus of Columbus used and new automotive dealership Existing zoning district: Suburban Office Proposed zoning district: PUD No. of acres to be rezoned: 2.341 ± Germain Properties << ~ 273-008279 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 273-008289 ' I ~ O -O ag-. 273-008281 _u ?GJO Total Acreage: 2.5902 ± acres ~ 1 Address: 3885 Dublin-Granville Road ~ - - - - - Location: Located East of the Scioto River and West of Sawmill Road. SCHEDULEI (page 2 of 2) Side of Street: Located South of Dublin-Granville Road and contiguous to the Griffith properties. Nearest Intersection: Dublin-Granville Road and Dublin Center Drive. Distance from Nearest Intersection: Approximately 0' to 248' East from Nearest Intersection Existing land use/development: new and used automobile dealership Proposed land use/development: new and used automobile dealership Existing zoning district: PUD Proposed zoning district: PUD No. of acres to be rezoned: 2.5902 ± i•] I} t1 ~ ! ~'n ~pp~p2~ t LE ~I 03/01 /00 - 8641083 Vo s S ter Se moor and ease LL.P ry Y MEMORANDUM TO: File FROM: Amy B. Good DATE: February 24, 2000 RE: Parce1273-009606 Ossa D. LeGeese and Raymond C. Davis The Franklin County Treasurer's Office confirmed that the referenced property has not paid property taxes since 1996. Due to this delinquency, the Treasurer's Office does not have a current mailing address for the property owners. A property must be delinquent for one and a half to two years before the process for selling the land begins. Currently the total amount of taxed due on the property is $713.57. E~LE CC~Y ~64a~ - ~ 200 CITY OF DUDLIN 02/24/00 - 8839715 ~GRIFFITH ~ V 1~~,~ r'"~ Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being located in Quarter Township 3, Township 2, Range 19, United States Military Lands and being those tracts ~of land conveyed to Donn W. Griffith, by deeds of record in Deed Book 3051, Page 76 and Official Record 4103A05, all references being to records in the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of West Dublin-Granville Road (State Route 161) at the northeasterly comer of said Donn W. Crriffith 1 acre tract (Official Record 4103A05), the northwesterly comer of the Village of Dublin 0.3386 acre tract, of record in Official Record 10268F03, said point also being located North 54° 00' 00" West, a distance of 553.40 feet from the intersection of said centerline, with the centerline of Sawmill Road, the easterly line of Quarter Township 3; thence South 35° 32' 00" West, along the westerly line of the Village of Dublin 0.336 acre tract and the westerly line of the Dublin Sawmill Properties 8.670 acre tract, of record in Official Record 10272F07 (passing an iron pin found at 30.00 feet), a distance of 501.67 feet to an iron pin found at the southwesterly corner of the Dublin Sawmill Properties 8.670 acre tract, the northeasterly comer of the Church of Christ on Maztin Road 5.745 acre tract, of record in Deed Book 2521, Page 327 and Deed Book 2521, Page 330; '~.r. thence North 85° 55' 00" West, along the northerly line of said Church of Christ on Martin Road 5.745 acre tract, a distance of 186.10 feet to an iron pin found at the southeasterly corner of Stoneridge Lane (50 feet in width); thence North 26° 33' 00" East, along the easterly terminus of Stoneridge Lane and along the easterly line of the Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc. 2.946 acre tract, of record in Official Record 12839E02 (passing iron pins found at 54.16 feet and 522.44 feet), a distance of 608.30 feet to a point in the centerline of West Dublin-Granville Road; thence South 54° 00' 00" East, along said centerline of West Dublin Granville Road, a distance of 253.75 feet to the place of beginning, containing 2.662 acres, more or less. Subject however, to all legal highways and/or rights-of--ways, if any, of previous record. Bearings contained herein, aze based on the same meridian as the bearing of the centerline of West Dublin-Granville Road (South 54° 00' 00" East), of record in Official Record 4103A05, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. C~ t`5 ~ ~s - C1~`~` - ~ ~ ` Excepting the following therefrom (continued on pages 2 through 4) '~r.r Griffith (page 2) iw Being a parcel of land lying on the right Side of the centerline of a survey, made for the Ohio Department of Transportation and being located within the following described points in the boundary thereof: Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin and being a part of Quarter Township 3, Township 2 North, Range 19 West, United States Militazy Lands, and being a 0.110 acre portion of 0.88 acre tract (Pazcel l) as conveyed to Donn W. Griffith by deed of record in Deed Book 3051, Page 76; and being a 0.106 acre portion of 0.98 acre tract (Pazcel 2) as conveyed to Donn W. Griffith by deed of record in Deed Book 3051, Page 76, and being a 0.105 acre portion of 1.0 acre tract as conveyed to Donn W. Griffith by deed of record in Official Record 4103A05; all of the aforementioned references being to the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Commencing at a point reference at the intersection of the centerline of S.R.161 with the centerline of Sawmill Road said point being Station 69+61.29; thence North 54 degrees 12 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 5.98 feet, along the centerline of S.R. 161 to a point (S.R. 161 Station 69+55.31); thence North 54 degrees 24 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 484.96 feet, along the centerline . of S.R. 161 to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 64+70.35); thence North 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 92.83 feet, along the centerline of S.R. 161 to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 63+77.52) said point being the northeasterly corner of the said 1.0 acre tract, and said point being also the northwesterly corner of a 0.3386 acre tract as conveyed to The Village of Dublin, Ohio by deed of record in Official Record 10268F03, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and said point being also the True Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; thence South 37 degrees 30 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 56.04 feet, along the easterly line of the said 1.0 acre tract, along the westerly line of the said 0.3386 acre tract, and also along the westerly line of a 8.775 acre tract as conveyed to Dublin-Sawmill Properties, an Ohio Joint Venture__ by deed of record in Official Record 13340I16 Recorder's Office Franklin 1~}io to a poi~pt, (S.R. 161 Station 63+75.40, 56.00 feet right); ~ ~ r~, ~ ~ rr 1 ~ f' ~ OF DU~~IN GiTY Griffith (page 3) thence North 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds West, a distance of 81.50 feet, crossing the said 1.0 acre tract to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 62+93.91, 56.00 feet right), and said point being in the westerly line of the said 1.0 acre tract, and said point being also in the easterly line of a 0.98 acre tract (Parcel 2); thence North 54 degrees 39 seconds 27 minutes West a distance of 79.62 feet, crossing the said 0.98 acre tract to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 62+14.28, 56.00 feet right), said point being in the westerly line of the said 0.98 acre tract (Pazcel 2), and said point being also in the easterly line of the said 0.88 acre tract; thence crossing the said 0.88 acre tract (Pazcel 1) by the following described two (2) courses: 1. North 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds West a distance of 47.58 feet, to a point curvarture, (S.R. 161 Station 61+66.71, 56.00 feet right); 2. Along the arc of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 1890.50 feet, a delta angle of O1 degrees 03 minutes 38 seconds, the chord of said curve that bears North 55 degrees 11 minutes 16 seconds West, 34.99 feet to a point, (S.R.161 Station 61+30.68, 56.00 feet right), said point being in the westerly line of the said 0.88 acre tract (Pazcel 1), and said point being also in the easterly lire of a 2.946 acre tract as conveyed to Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, by deed of record in Official Record 12839E02, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; thence North 25 degrees 51 minutes 33 seconds East a distance of 56.59 feet, along the westerly line of the said 0.88 acre tract (Pazcel 1), and also along the easterly line of the said 2.946 acre tract to a point of curvature , (S.R. 161 Station 61+22.39), said point being the northwesterly corner of the said 0.88 acre tract (Parcel 1), said point being the northeasterly corner of the said 2.946 acre tract, and said point being also in the centerline of said S.R.161; thence along the northerly line of the said 0.88 acre tract (Parcel 1), and also along the centerline of said S.R.161 by the following described two (2) courses: 1. Along the azc of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 1946.50 feet, a delta angle of O1 degrees 18 minutes 16 seconds, the chord of said curve that beazs South 55 degrees 18 minutes 36 seconds East, 44.32 feet to a point of tangency, (S.R.161 Station 61+66.71); 2. South 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 43.67 feet, to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 62+10.39), said point being the northwesterly corner of the said 0.98 acre tract, said point being the northeasterly corner of the said 0.88 acre tract, and said point being also in the centerline of said S.R.161; thence South 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds East a distance of 85.00 feet, along the northerly line of the said 0.98 acre tract, and also along the centerline of said S.R.161 to to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 62+95.39), said point being the northwesterly corner of the said 1.0 acre tract, said point being the northeasterly corner of the said 0.98 acre tract (Pazce12), and said point being also in th__ e.__~ - . centerline of said S.R.161; ~=,~1 ~ r~ I I , , ~ I ~ -~`~zZ ~ FILE ~~Y , ~ ~~,~~~f~ Griffith (page 4) thence South 54 degrees 39 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 82.13 feet, along the northerly line of the said 1.0 acre tract, and also along the centerline of S.R. 161 to the True Point of Beginning, containing 0.321 acres, more or less, subject to all easements, restrictions, andrights-of- way of record. It is understood the above described 0.321 acre pazcel contains 0.110 of an acre, more or less including the present road which occupies 0.060 of an acre, more or less; 0.106 of an acre, more or less including the present road which occupies 0.058 of an acre, more or less; 0.105 of an acre, more or less including the present road which occupies 0.056 of an acre, more or less. Beazings were transferred by a field traverse originating on Franklin County Control Monuments "FRANK 73" and "FRANK 173", and aze based on the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System. South Zone and the North American Datum of 1983. This description is based on a survey of SR 161, made by Woolpert, Columbus, Ohio, for the State of Ohio in 1992 under the direction and supervision of Michael J. Purtee Ohio Registered Surveyor No. 7424. Said stations being the Stations numbers as stipulated in the hereinbefore mentioned survey and as shown by plans on file in the Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio. Prior Instrument Reference: Deed Book 3051, Page 76; Official Record 4103A05, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. Of the above described azea, 0.110 acre is to be deleted from Auditor's Pazcel 273-8276, 0.106 acre is to be deleted from Auditor's Pazce1273-8278 and 0.105 acre is to be deleted from Auditor's Pazcel 273-8275. D ~ `(`2-Z ~e~l ~~'fl?'?^- : SO ~ ~i~c?' ~i ce.~r ~ ~`~-raw.' ~ i 5~` .E.o : Puy, P U~.;~ ~~~Q ;~i~'. D I~ l~~ riNd i CITY QF DU~?LIN ao~ E C Py AIL GERMAIN Situated in the State of phio, County of l:ran!<lin, and in thet;il.y of bublia, snd bekng 2.84$ scree of iaad also being ;portions of l+arcela 6, 7, 8, said 8 of an unrecorded plat ea )aid out and surveyed by C.p'. Bowers, Itegistrre.i 8urveyar. datrd Septesber 1953, and a?ore particularly deaacribed as follows: Bt'ginning in the centerline of worthint;:ton-1)yblin kaad titoute lbif and the northeasterly cornet of parcel 6 as recorded to ttaoard 07705JU7, F'xaaklia County Recorder's t~f fieN; theme clans the easterly line of parcel B,~ 8.26° 55' $7" N. , 555.00 Poet to t;he northerly rfght-of-aaay line of dt:oneridge i.ane, paataine an irGn pfn at 30.40 feet; thence a?lons the northerly rig3it-of-wall' lice of 8tosseridse Lane x.80° 41' 20" K.. 130.15 feet; thence caaitinuiaas along acid northerly right~af-way lino, and"on a curve to the right, 3x.65 feet to the easterly right-of=way line of Hobbs Urive, sold curve ha~•ing a radius of 20 feet and a chord oi' 30.48 feet, bsarins H.96° 03' 10" N.: tllenee clans said eazasterly right-of-uar line. N.13° 85' Ot)" R., $31.03 feet; thence ~antinuing along said easterly ari4tht-of-way line said on a curve to the right 161.80 feet, said curve h4vinlL a ra~diu6 of 691.10 feet and a chord of ;d0•.94 feet, bearius N.20°!6' U8"E:; thence continuins sloall acid easterly right-of•~tray line h.26° 54' 15" 8., • i3.1.40 feet to the ceaiterliae of korthingtan-BUblia 8oad; thence along said uetntarline and on a ~•urve to the right 829.82 feet. said curve haYfag a radiga of 2,000 seat and a oiiorti, of 219.21 feet, bearing 8.58°15'30"l:.: thence coaxtialai~•aloaig said centerli.ae 8.53° a8' 48'i:. , 27.$7 feet to the pleas a! be;tinnifig, ooatalinins 2.946 acres, [wore or leas. aub~ei;t to till rights-of-wsy and eastasnta of record. E;LE C . o _ ~.g~ ~ . t ' 'fir! r1 `~l U' l~ C~T~` ~~_~~~1_IN Excepting the following therefrom (continued on pages 2 and 3) w . ~ Germain (page 2) ' ~ E?CHIptT A - PAR~GEL I WD CITY OF DUBLIN, OMIO GGRMAIN PROPERTIES OF COLUMBUS, INC. ~ DESCRIPTION OC ADDTIONAL RIt'iHT-OF WAY FOR DUBLIN CENTER DRIVE Situated in the State ofOhio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Quarter Township 3, Township 2, Range 19, United States Military Lands, and being part of a 2.946 acre tract conveyed to Gern`ain Properties of Columbus, Inc. of record in O.R. 12839.02 of the Recorders Office, Franklin County, Ohio and descn'bed as follows: Beginning for reference at a 5/8" rebar found at the northeasterly corner of a 14.8 f S acre tract to T&R Properties of record O.R. 25195-C-10, thence eastorly a distance of E3S.?S fret, along the north property lino of a 4.79 acre trnct to Martin Road trhurch and tha south right of way line of Stoneridge Lane of record in Q.R. 17987-G-i3, to an iron pin. Thence N 26°SS'S~" E a distance of 54.16 feet, crossing Stoneridge Lane to a point in the north right of way line of Stoneridge Lane. Thence along the North right of way of Stoneridge Lane, N 85°41' 20"W, a distance of 104.49 feet to the true point of beginning. Thence continuing along the right of way line of Stoneridge Lane a distance of 30.06 feet, N 8S°41' 20"W, to a is~oa pin set. Thence with a curve to the right (deita=99°160", rndius~0.00 feet, length=34.58 feet) with a chord bearing N 36 03' 10" W a distance of 30.48 feet to a iron prn set. Thence N 13°35' 00" E, a distance of 117.35 fat to a iron pin set on the right of way line of Dublin Center Drive of record in O.R 09251-J-03. Thence with a curve to the Left (delta=9~4' 18", radius=375.00 feet. lenght~59.37 feet) with a chord bearing S 10°b6' 10" W . a distance of 59.31 feet to a iron pin set. 7'henee S S°33' S 1 " W, a distance of 43.91 feet to a iron pin set. Thence S 42°00' 22" L""•, a distance of 52.32 feet to the true paint of beginning, containing 0.0318 acres, more or less, subject to all insturments of record. This description is based on a survey completed in July of 1997 and ORV 12839E0? Franklin Exhibit B. ~ ~ .(i~,_ - ~ Surveyor ~ ~/y 9~ ~r _ ~ ~ ~lfE~! Basis Beating ~ ~ ~ i ~ `i` d ~ r 1. Bearings shown are based on the East Right-of-Way of Dublin Center Dr. (N 13°3S' E) as descn'bed for dedication of Right-of-lNay ORV 92S1J03. ®p-O~~~ ~~~E COPY , . G ~ l f / \f~ 3 9Tib0'd S8i£ 9L8 bt9 ~lNtidWO~ 1tiQ0~32! SZ :0Z 0002-Z0-21dW F.7t:1~1IB19' A -PARCEL NO. ISWD Germain (page 3) CITY OF DUBLIN. Qifili0 • ~ clr~mr ineopi~rt>ES o>R co>.u~sus. clue. Dl£SCRIPI7QlY OF ADDI'ITOIYrlI. RIglf!'1<'-pF WAY t''01t S.t7[.161 Being a parcel of land lying on the rl~ Sick of the centerline of a survey, made for 1~„QbjQ Dtne_rrment of Tnnsnatetion and recorded in Plat Book .Page ,the records of Franklin County and being located Within the following described points in. the boundary thereof Situate in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, Gity of Dublin and being a part of Quarter Township 3, Township 3 Notch, Range 19 West, United States Miliuq Lands, and being a 0.324 acre portion of a 3.946 acne tract as conveyed to Germain Properties ofColumbus, inc.. an Ohio corporation in Ot1'teial Record i2839E02, Recorder's Office, Franklin Cottnry, t~ltio and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: Comtttrneing at a point reference at th` intersection of the centerline of S.R. 161 with the centerline otSawmill Road said point being Station 69t6t.'_?9; Thence Notch S4 degr~ecs 24 minutes 50 seconds West, a distance of 490.79 feet, along the centerline otS.R. 161 to a point, (S.R. 16l Station 64+70.35); Thence North 54 degrtxs 39 minutes Z7 seconds West, a distance of 303.9 feet, along the centerline of S.R. 161 to a point of cutvawre, (S.R. 161 Station 61+66.71); Thence along the centerline of S.R. 161. and also along the arc of a curve to the leR, said eatrve having a radius 1946.50 feet. a delta angle of O I degree I S minutes l6 secoetds, the chord of said curve that burs Noah SS degt+ees 18 minutes 36 seconds West. 44:32 fact to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 61+22.19) said poise being the ntutlteasterly corns °f the said 2.946 acre trae4 and raid point being also the eWetltwesterly eortter of 0.88 acre tract (Paclel t) as conveyed to Donn W. GriE)'tth by deed of t+e°ord in peed Book 3051, Page 76, Recorder's Otlice Franklin Coiutry, Ohio, and said point being also the True Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; Thence South 25 degrees SI minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 56.59 feet. along the easterly line of said :.946 acre tract, and also along the westerly Bete of said 0.88 acre tree: (Parcel I) to a point, (S.R. 161 Station 61+30.68, 56.00 feet right). ' Theatce crossing the said 2.946 acre tract by the following described pro (2) coupes: 1. Along the sn: of a curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 1890.50 feet. a delta angle of 06 degrees 23 minutes 22 seconds, the chord of said crave that bears North 58 degrees 54 minutes 4G seconds West, 210.71 fat to a point. (S.R.161 Station 59+13.61, 56.00 feet right); 2. Along the arc of t+ curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 35.00 fee4 a delta angle of 92 degrees 00 minutes 45 seeottds, the chore! of said curve that bears South 71 tkgress 53 minutes 10 seconds West, 5036 feet to a point, (S.R.161 Station 58+76.90.91.90 feet right), aid point being in the westerly litter of the said 2.946 acre tract. said point bein in the line of a 0,409 ~ tract as conveyed to Village of Dublin.Ohio by deed of t ; ~ ~ ~2 Record 9251120. RGCOrder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and said point ~ ~ easterly ~ fight-of-vray line of Dublin Center' Drive S.; Thence North 25 degrees 52 mictutes 48 seconds East s d'tstaxe of 91.91 feet, a ong ,~,~~Y id 2.946 aero tract, slop the easterly line of the said 0.409 acre tract, sad a so altC°.~ l,tte attire ~ e F D U~ l_ 4 N easterly tight-of-way line of said Dublin Center Drive S. to s poirrt °f curvature. (S.R. i 1 58+7S.40k said point tieing the northwesterly corner of the said 2.946 acre ttset, turd sa' the oentcrtitte of wid S.R.161; ins of the su<id 2946 ttcte abng>he eeataline of s~ P '[hence abng du >torthaly l artd also along tit. en: of s curve to dte tight, tutld curve having a radius of 1946.50 feet. a delta ttttg[e of 07 tie8t+oes 16 mitoses 12 aooouds. the chord of staid cutYe that bars South 59 degras 3S mittuEes SO seconds East, 246.82 Pest t° the Ttut: Point °f Hem. containing 0.324 sae:, mare err less. subjxt to all oasernems. r+estrictiaas. ~ ~ie'Of~' of record. . "gkariogs ttraR ttrawfaertad by ai hold aatretaa ari~naing ~ Rranklia Cotmq? cottttut M ~pRATaC 73" acid " 173"~ std as+e 6asad au Itlb Ohio $tMe Platee Cootdrnate System. SOMtb l~~ acrd tlteNotth Ame~.~ of 19x3 ~ ~R;~,M~.P u D,~P b',~,r""d ~INHdWO~ 1tjQ0~3Z1 ~ 9f ~ 00002- 0-~tiW~• 9T~'d S8S£ 9L8 bt9 - - ~ n.,. _ i - Schedule II ~X ~ 1 ~ ` ~ Contiguous Property Owners Parcel Property Owner Property Address Mailing Address Number 273- Lowes Home Centers Inc 21.63 acres Federated Lowes Home Centers Inc 009084 Blvd P.O. Box 1111 N. Wilkesboro, N.C. 28659 273- State Savings Bank 3800 Dublin Granville Rd Fifth Third Bank 009082 Dublin, OH 43017 Properties Jim Baldwin, Accounting 21 East State Street Columbus, OH 43215- 4228 273- Maria Ciotola 6451 Sawmill Rd Maria Ciotola 008329 Dublin, OH 43017 5494 Carnoustic Ct Dublin, OH 43017 273- State Savings Bank .43 acres Sawmill Rd Fifth Third Bank 009512 Properties Attn: Mary Gleckner 21 East State St 14th Floor Columbus, OH 43215- 4228 273- EMRO Marketing Co. 1) .46 acres Sawmill Rd Marathon Ashland Petrol 008328 2) 3750 Dublin Granville Property Tax Dept Dublin, OH 43017 539 S. Main St Findlay, OH 45840-3242 273- Ronald K. Nims 3755 Dublin Granville Rd Ronald K. Nims & 008806 Dublin, OH 43017 Elaine A. Beed 5160 Woodbridge Ave Powell, OH 43065 273- Dublin Sawmill Properties 6301-333 Dublin Bernard R. Ruben 008261 Granville Rd Plaza Properties Dublin, OH 43017 P.O. Box 9601 Columbus, OH 43209- 0601 D ~o-oa~~ a ! - 000 j' S l~ - LE COP~___ FI Schedule II Page 2 of 5 r 273- Church of Christ on Martin 2900 Martin Rd Church of Christ on 008360 Road Dublin, OH 43017 Martin Road 2940 Martin Rd Dublin, OH 43017 273- Ossa D. Le Geese & .137 acres Martin Dr No address on file 009606 Raymond C. Davis 273- Italia Homes Inc. 1) 3895-905 Stoneridge T&R Properties 008272 Dublin, OH 43017 Rob Sabatino/1St Floor 6563 Worthington Galena 273_ 2) 2994 Glenloch Cir Worthington, OH 43086- 009329 Dublin, OH 43017 2659 273_ 3) 3012 Glenloch Cir 009338 Dublin, OH 43017 273_ 4) 3015 Glenloch Cir 009349 Dublin, OH 43017 273_ 5) 3019 Glenloch Cir 009350 Dublin, OH 43017 273_ 6) 3035 Glenloch Cir 009354 Dublin, OH 43017 273- Dept. of Medicine 3900 Stoneridge Lane DMF of Ohio 009146 Dublin, OH 43017 3900 Stoneridge Lane Dublin, OH 43017 273- Gordon Food Services Inc 3901 Dublin Granville Gordon Food Services 009145 Dublin, OH 43017 Attn: Rick Rusthoven P.O. Box 1787 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 p O-fi~~g~ Z~s ~ ~ R,~a - 1 2000 t CITY OF DUBLIN ILE Schedule II Page 3 of 5 273- Germain Properties of 3885 Dublin Granville Germain Properties of 008281 Columbus Inc Dublin, OH 43017 Columbus Inc 5777 Scarborough Blvd 273_ Columbus, OH 43232 008289 273- 008279 273- Ronald L. May 2986 Glenloch Cir Ronald L. May ~ 009325 Dublin, OH 43017 2986 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Richard A. Turner 2988 Glenloch Cir Richard A. Turner 009326 Dublin, OH 43017 2988 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Ross E. & Amanda L. 2992 Glenloch Cir Ross E. & Amanda L. 009328 Shane Dublin, OH 43017 Shane 2992 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Pamela A. Lee 2996 Glenloch Cir Pamela A. Lee 009330 Dublin, OH 43017 2996 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Oral D. & Nicole L. Miller 2998 Glenloch Cir Oral D. & Nicole L. 009331 Dublin, OH 43017 Miller 2998 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Drew W. & Kim 3000 Glenloch Cir Drew W. & Kim 009332 Buttermore Dublin, OH 43017 Buttermore 3000 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Donna M. McGrath 3002 Glenloch Cir Donna M. McGrath 009333 Dublin, OH 43017 3002 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Christina A. Teutsch 3004 Glenloch Cir Christina A. Teutsch 009334 Dublin, OH 43017 3004 Gle 0 ~u~lin~0~ ~O1[~ U, - ' ?000 / F Schedule II Page 4 of 5 273- Terence S. Tsai 3006 Glenloch Cir Terence S. Tsai 009335 Dublin, OH 43017 3006 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Robert E. Babione 3008 Glenloch Cir Robert E. Babione 009336 Dublin, OH 43017 3008 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Sharifa Mino 3010 Glenloch Cir Sharifa Mino 009337 Dublin, OH 43017 3010 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Sharif I. Carter 3014 Glenloch Cir Sharif I. Carter 009339 Dublin, OH 43017 3014 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Bradley J. Love 3016 Glenloch Cir Bradley J. Love 009340 Dublin, OH 43017 3016 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Carol J. & Kenneth J. Ehli 3047 Glenloch Cir Carol J. & Kenneth J. Ehli 009341 Trustees Dublin, OH 43017 Trustees 6143 Abbotsford Dr Dublin, OH 43017 273- Piara S. &Kuldip K. 3051 Glenloch Cir Piara S. &Kuldip K. 009342 Kanwal Dublin, OH 43017 Kanwal 3051 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Terri J. Ray 3055 Glenloch Cir Terri J. Ray 0093443 Dublin, OH 43017 3055 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Diane E. Smith 3059 Glenloch Cir Diane E. Smith 009344 Dublin, OH 43017 3059 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Julie E. Schall 3063 Glenloch Cir Julie E. Schall 009345 Dublin, OH 43017 1837 Birchcreek Columbus, OH 43229 ' 7 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ oo -~2~ ~ - .2000 L ClT~' OF DI~~LlN Iv'.. Schedule II Page 5 of 5 273- Matthew J. & Michelle L. 3067 Glenloch Cir Matthew J. & Michelle L. 009364 Eggbert Dublin, OH 43017 Eggbert 3067 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Kathryn E. Duvall 3071 Glenloch Cir Kathryn E. Duvall 009347 Dublin, OH 43017 3071 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Konstantin A. Sokolov 3075 Glenloch Cir Konstantin A. Sokolov 009348 Dublin, OH 43017 3075 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Jennifer Georgeadis - 3023 Glenloch Cir Jennifer Georgeadis 009351 Dublin, OH 43017 3023 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Jeffrey S. Hudson 3027 Glenloch Cir Jeffrey S. Hudson 009352 Dublin, OH 43017 3027 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Michael F. Doyle 3031 Glenloch Cir Micheal F. Doyle 009353 Dublin, OH 43017 3031 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Kathleen Campbell 3039 Glenloch Cir Kathleen Campbell 009355 Dublin, OH 43017 3039 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- Christopher & Nicole A. 3043 Glenloch Cir Christopher & Nicole A. 009356 Burgess Dublin, OH 43017 Burgess 3043 Glenloch Cir Dublin, OH 43017 273- B Four Properties 3995 Dublin Granville Rd B Four Properties 009148 Dublin, OH 43017 P.O. Box 1025 Powell, OH 43065 ~~"i LS 5 S ~ ~ _ _ R ~i .;)~J ~ ~~E~~ - 2000 L [ ! Y~`~' E ~ ~ e! ~ F. 02/29/00 - 8824220.2 r~ EXHIBIT ' V. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of Current Property Owner(s): Donn [4. Griffith Mailing Address: 3859 W. Dublin-Granville Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: Fax: 614-889-2556 614-761-3623 Name of Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): 'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. J. Thomas Mason, ESCI . Mailing Address: VOryS, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (Street, Ciry, State, Zip Code) 52 East Gay Street, Columbus , Ohio 43215 Daytime Telephone: Fax: 614-464-5446 614-464-6350 Which of the above is the primary contact person? J. Thomas Mason V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site visits to the property are necessary by Ciry representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes Ciry representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and northwest Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the a licant until some future date. The A licant/Owner hereb acknowled es that a royal of this r uest for rezonin b the Dublin PP PP Y 9 PP e9 9 Y Planning and Zoning Commission ancUor Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Applicant. VII. OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE I Donn W. Griffith, ,the owner anc~gplirant, hereby authorize J. Thomas Mason to act as my representative and agent in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application including modifying the prejec;t, and I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent. Signature of urrent Property Owner: Date: March 1,2000 Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: r~a 2000 VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT ; Ii I i ~ ~ i~! ! ~ ~ ~ i Rezoning Application , PLA-108 Date 09/2/99 i i_ t~:,b~~~,f5 ~ I~~ GPI _ _ _ _ ~ _ ' • ` EXHIBIT " " R STATE OF Ohio COUNTY OF Franklin I Donn W . Griffith , , t~a~plicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attache exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant or ~ Date: Authorized Representative: March 1, 2000 Subscribed and sworn to before me this lst day of March ~ 2000 Notary Publ c ~ "apuunnu~n ```~o~PP1AL SF' ? ` ~ODORE SYRH, ATfOn? ' • * NOl#R~ PIB11C, STAT: ' " a Abcoml~Sioul~s no c:,:.....:_, c... s,. ~o Seetlon 147.03 R.C. 9rF//~F1,D~a r7wr ~r•~ I 1-_ 1 J7 ..._l._~.~_ ~ I ~;~'~-oaf. _ _ .2000 a16` FIL R~•rornnrf Ai,hhr„~tuxi P,irln S of 5 PlA-1C8 09`27199 ~s _ _ Y_ JOSEPH W. TESTA FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR MAP AREA :SS DATE FEB 29, 2444 ~ ' jai toaw ,-R..~. ~ xoa» i i r - ~ - . ionm e _ ~~at ~ i 'Y _ PARKING 0°7° J - - ~ _ - ~ o. w' ~ ~ _ RED Mrr ~ ~ ; - a _ _ a o ~ ~ ~ 5 € i l~ ti $ S ~ \ ~ P -~00va°'~" PA ~ ARKIN ~ CANOP ~ - - - _ M ~ ~ i ~ _ . 1 / y . ~ ~ ~ ~-7 ~ ~ ~ 57117E St3 / e ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ _ g _ i _ ~ m - ,~e ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ ,c / , mob' e , - _ G- C ~L~ 5 - - _ _ - ~ ~wai { ~ ; PARKNG 7 iS ~ - - _ _ ~ CAI- ' ~ ARKf~(' - - o~ .7 ~ - - - , , ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ' e ~s ~ \ ~ ~wc ~g PARKING ~ / { v LIN / SAWMILL CENTER j ~ ~r DUBLIN ~ ~ ~ ~ ; I J AWMILL ~ i : ~ ~ ' ~ ENTER ~ i ~ - _ ~ ~ j_~ ~ I' _ _ ~ ~ coNOO _ - W g / PARKING ~ ~ - - - - F ~ ~ ~j ~ g I l 1 DISCLAIMER ~ _ Cn ~ A 1_~ = r',2 This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from re eeds. ~ R7H _ I I survey plots, and other public records and data. Users of this map ore notified that the public i a y information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this ma They OOrO~~ County and the mopping companies a55ume n0 legol responsibilities for the informotion con{Dined n thi -m6~----/-~---------_ _ Pleose notify the Franklin County GIS Division of ony discrepancies. s l ' I ' j 1d _ . _ _ _ GIS DIVISION ~)CH18R DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 18, 2000 CPfI' OF DGI~LI 'vision of Planning 100 Shier-Rings Road .~,n, Ohio 43016-1136 Phone/TDD:614.761-6550 fax: 614.161-6566 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action on this case at this meeting: 3. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 00-0282 - Lexus/Griffith - 3849, 3859, & 3885 West Dublin-Granville Road Location: 4.93 acres located on the southeast corner of West Dublin-Granville Road (SR 161) and Dublin Center Drive. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development, and SO, Suburban Office and Institutional Districts. Request: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: A freestanding, 3,800 square foot, pre-owned auto dealership building addition to an existing 20,113 square foot auto dealership. Applicant: Donn W. Griffith, 3859 West Dublin-Granville Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., 5777 Scarborough Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio 43232; represented by J. Thomas Mason, Vorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, 52 East Gay Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216. MOTION: To approve this rezoning application because it provides for the expansion of a Dublin business, and the text limits the land use to an automobile dealership, with nine conditions: 1) That the total site area not exceed 70 percent lot coverage; 2) That the text be revised to limit the use of the site to an auto dealership; 3) That the text and plans be revised to eliminate the northern access point on Dublin Center Drive and that the cut align with the Gordon Foods access to the west, subject to staff approval; 4) That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the "fourth" sign along Marci/Stoneridge Lane; 5) That the plans and text be revised to provide adequate screening on the eastern elevation of the existing dealership, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to eliminate "phase one" of the proposed development; 7) That a revised tree survey, tree preservation plan, and tree replacement plan be submitted prior to scheduling for City Council, subject to staff approval; ~MRTED TO Page 1 of 2 ~ ~ ~n 1~'OR INIEET1Nd ON DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION May 18, 2000 3. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 00-0282 - Lexus/Griffith - 3849, 3859, & 3885 West Dublin-Granville Road (Continued) 8) That a revised landscape plan, including the dry laid stone wall as presented at this meeting and the changes to the eastern wall screening plan, conforming to Code and the comments contained in this staff report be submitted, subject to staff approval; and 9) That a revised text and plans be submitted within 30 days, subject to staff approval. * J. Thomas Mason agreed to the above conditions, except Condition 1. VOTE: 3-3. RESULT: The motion failed. This rezoning application will be forwarded to City Council with no recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION Chad Gibson Planner Page 2 of 2 ~~o PROPOSED TEST fi LEXUS OF COLUMBUS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TEXT Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc. dba Lexus of Columbus ("Germain") and Dr. Donn W. Griffith ("Griffith") own contiguous parcels of property on the south side of Dublin- Granville Road (State Route 161), just west of Sawmill Road (collectively, the "Property"). The Germain property is currently zoned PUD, and is the site of the Lexus of Columbus automobile dealership. The Griffith property is zoned suburban office and is the site of a veterinary clinic and health food store. Germain and Griffith have entered into aten-year ground lease (the "Lease") whereby Germain will lease the Griffith property in order to expand its automobile dealership. The Lease provides Germain the option of purchasing the Griffith property upon the conclusion of the Lease term. In order to expand its automobile dealership, Germain intends to raze the existing improvements on the Griffith property, and to develop the Property in substantial conformance with the preliminary development plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Development Plan") and the following planned unit development standards. This Application is being submitted by Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc. with the consent and approval of Dr. Donn Griffith. A. General Development Standards ("PUD Standards"): 1. If these PUD Standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then these PUD Standards shall control. The PUD development text currently applicable to the Germain property shall be superceded by these PUD Standards. 2. These PUD Standards shall not require modification of any structures, landscaping, graphics or other improvements on the Germain property (the "Existing Germain Improvements"), except as otherwise specifically provided herein and/or as depicted on the Development Plan. B. Permitted Uses: The Property may be used for the following purposes: 1. Motor Vehicle Dealers (new and used vehicles) as permitted by Section 153.028 of the Dublin Code and those uses that do not strictly come within the definition of motor vehicle dealer but which currently exist on the Germain property and/or are customarily associated with such use and constitute a comparatively minor part of the total use including: a. automotive service. b. retail sales of manufacturer branded retail accessories and items and automotive related retail items as an ancillary use, provided, the use is internal to the permitted use. c. the sale of beverages and food items, as an ancillary use, provided, the use is internal to the permitted use. i 1~ ?l f' ter f~ ~a t~ ,~F,.r' UUid ~ Z7 :~~JJU d. petroleum storage and dispensing as an ancillary use, provided that there shall be no retail sales of fuel. C. Permitted Modifications to Existing Germain Improvements: 1. As noted above but subject to the landscape plan submitted with the Development Plan, landscaping located on the east side of the Germain property shall be removed to facilitate construction of vehicular and pedestrian traffic improvements and corridors and landscape islands, all as generally depicted on the Development Plan. ""'i 2. Provided that the Property is used for a common purpose, there shall be no setback, landscaping (other than as shown on the landscape plan) and/or minimum side yard requirements applicable to the common Germain/Griffith property line. 3. All three of the existing curb cuts serving the Germain property will be eliminated (the one on SR 161 and the two on Dublin Village Drive). D. Development of the Property: 1. Architectural Standards: The building to be constructed on the Griffith property (the "Building") shall conform with the architecture and site design of the existing Lexus dealership, and shall be of a size, configuration and located as generally depicted on the Development Plan. The exterior of the Building shall be concrete block with "STO" E.I.F.S. with finish to match the Existing Germain Improvements (Lexus classic gray color scheme). Glazing to be black anodized store front with 1" tinted insulated glass. 2. Signage and Graphics: In addition to the graphics/signage which are part of the ~1 Existing Germain Improvements, the Applicant shall be entitled to one internally illuminated wall graphic ("Pre-Owned" or similar) on the Building (facing SR .n..~i. 161). The wall graphic shall not to be higher than 17' above grade, the colors and materials shall be the same as the wall graphic currently located on the Lexus dealership and the size of the graphic shall not exceed the maximum size permitted by the Dublin Graphics Code. Additionally, the Applicant shall be entitled to two additional directional signs on the Property; at such locations as the Applicant selects provided both directional signs comply with the Dublin Graphics Code. 3. Height Limitations: The maximum height for the Building shall not exceed 30' measured in accordance with the Dublin Zoning Code. 4. Lighting: All exterior lighting shall conform generally with the materials, illumination standards and design criteria of similar lighting currently located on 2 the Germain property. All lights shall be arranged to reflect substantially all light away from any street or adjacent property. 5. Landscaping: All landscaping on the Property shall be in accordance with the Dublin landscape code and the landscape plan included within the Development Plan. 6. Yard and Setback Requirements: a. except as otherwise provided herein, side yards shall be 15' for pavement ~ and buildings. b. rear yard shall be 15' for pavement and buildings. c. the Building shall be set back a minimum distance of 116.5' from the centerline of SR 161. 7. Curb Cuts and Traffic Patterns: All five of the existing curb cuts serving the Property will be eliminated as a result of the proposed development. Thereafter, vehicular access to and from the Property will be served by the following: (i) one curb cut onto SR 161 at the eastern end of the Griffith property (right in/right out), (ii) one curb cut onto Dublin Village Drive aligned with the curb cut serving Gordon Foods to the west, and (iii) a new curb cut onto Marcy Lane. The City will cooperate and coordinate with the Ohio Department of Transportation to establish the curb cut onto SR 161 as described above. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic patterns and corridors shall be as generally depicted on the Development Plan. Access to the Property shall be controlled at each curb cut by a gate system generally conforming in design and quality to the gates which are currently part of the Existing Germain Improvements. 8. Timin Sta ing of Construction: a. The house (veterinary clinic) and related improvements on the Griffith property shall be razed and removed therefrom within one year following the effective date of this zoning (the "Effective Date") and, until razed, such property may not be used for any purpose other than current uses. b. The Building, parking area and related improvements (including all landscaping required by the approved landscape plan) shall be constructed on the Property within one year following the Effective Date, subject to delays beyond Applicant's reasonable control. 9. Combination of Parcels: Within 60 days following the Effective Date and provided the Franklin County governmental agencies with jurisdiction therefore do not object, the Applicant shall submit to Dublin evidence that the three parcels currently comprising the Germain property have been combined into one tax 3 parcel and the three parcels currently comprising the Griffith property have been combined into one, separate tax parcel. Dublin may condition issuance of a building permit for the improvements to be constructed on the Griffith property upon the Applicant's compliance with this provision. If and at such time as there is common ownership of the Property and provided the Franklin County governmental agencies with jurisdiction therefore do not object, the owner thereof shall combine the Germain property and the Griffith property into one tax parcel. 10. Lot Coverage/Density: Not less than thirty percent of the Property shall be dedicated to green space; provided, however, such green space may be allocated between the Griffith property and Germain property as generally depicted on the Development Plan to provide a more efficient use of the Property and site access. 11. Reciprocal Easement Agreement. Within 60 days following the Effective Date, the owner of the Griffith property and the owner of the Germain property shall execute and deliver a reciprocal easement agreement in order to impose certain rights and obligations upon the Germain property and the Griffith property for: (i) reciprocal easements of ingress and egress to and from the Property and adjoining rights-of--way, and (ii) the establishment of green space and related landscaping between the Building and the existing Lexus dealership, as generally depicted on the Development Plan. Dublin may condition issuance of a building permit for the improvements to be constructed on the Griffith property upon the Applicant's compliance with this provision. n~ 4 PTF- nm.; ~yd~ ~ Y 9 L~ 6~ 5L egg 2 lLtSl n~ p(L{ 66d~ Step ~ ~ L M~1 / 1 a s'~' j. ~ N i ~i' 1 .r~+., ~ ~ aa i ~ s9'~ q ~ 1 \ 1 ~a M~ a t'\1 E i/ian i~~s \ P ; _ ~ ~ I o~~ ~ I B S 1 `o C ~ 8 ~ I I _ o \ `A I _ w c I 3# ~ 6 ~ ~ ! I ~1 4 I i C 'ap _ T a \ \ O 1\ ~ Q 8g ` I ~ I~ t 0 o ~ 1\\ Z ~ II e I , ws.. ~ '4\ T A; ~ ~ » ~ ~ p e ~ 1\\ 1Z~ a ~ I„• € ~ ~ o Pi4c ~ ikg- r 4$ ~ G5~ ' .1 ' a 1 ~ R~ i s 1. i . ' a [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A T I ~ ~ p ~ - - I I -I _ _ _ I` ~ ~ ~ ~ m.cx I P5 ~ ~ I Lis ~w.,n 8 _ L _ _ _ _ 1. _ _ _ I ~ ~ ~ Ii I 1 u,u -'-I- - _ _ Q I I 3.~K s f N' GRAN VILIE RO D ~S R T Q T ~ ~ ~ p~~~ Pf4: 4 !'f~ ~ ® c~ ~ s 3 p,. y~F I~ ~'E o Icy ~ I~ o ~ i ann r non FAR!-OWJ~D CAR OUILDIAI4 „~r oration , ~ ® g OF CO UMBUg O ~ ~ ;',ROM.".,"'","; I I ~ 3 Ws~t Dublin-4rAnv111A Road w ' D~blTn, ONTO 43m1~ li~ ~I eo '.tsst'ea , o j ~ $e ~~~ioM ~ 1 ~ 3/~ _ ~ pyoN ~ 1 3i e'" c ~ t , ~ i P _-1 `x ~ ~ ~ ~~i~ ~ G ~ m 1 ~ 4 0 ~ -i ~ ~ ~ ~ A • 111 • p- _p R 1 ~ I ~ i Fes- ~ ~ `r 0 II ~ c1~ ; J it , ~ ~ `2 ~a ° ~ ~ ~ F--R n ,---1L i ~ r t- A.., I 1 1 ~ ~ vP se Z_.~ A"ems 4 1 r ' ie. ~ !p ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ i I' 1 r• 1.~ ' \ f II J I ~ • J 4 f 1 ' ~ p t ,,,0 ~ ~ of GW/N , _ I Pi, I . f$~i I _ ~ ~ a DUBLIN- GRANVIL~AO-- ~ S. R. 1 6 ~ 6,# ti ~~~f6~~~66 E h ~ e°°:~ ~ I__ ~ Z ~ LEXU BUS ~ ~ ~ SITE ENGINEERING, INC. u to ~ ~ ® a w•+cm,a ~ a! 66~ a? 1 I~ ea I~ ~ ors' ~ ~ / ~ i i i ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~I `o / m i Iii e ` ~ - - ~ a ~ - -i ~ ~ ~ 3 - 0 0 p..- _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ L~ ~ ` ~ r p-~ ~ C ~ ~ C-~ a J f R " e k ~ A ~ ~ ~ o ytg. i ~ f °s~ ~ rn` ratl, ti~ ~ ~ f~ i 6 iii J E~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ \ ~ ' ~ 8~ r J ~ r~ I *.M" O G A I~ J M i I ~ ~ arr o,° ~ ~ r k i~ , , ~ I ~i~a 7 D ~g~iN LAD GRANVi -.~.1_ R 0 ~ S. R. 1 6 1 ) A iR R 1 F ~~A ; Fi 6 ~ 6 6 ~s ~ ~ ~ ~B ~~a~~;pAll G,~~il O °T"1 iae•>~ (~g ~ ~ S 9F O ~ ~ I~~ ~ I B~~~g~~~~'~~~~(~ ~ C i i ~ i o s o w ~~Qf #~d[ ~ b a us t~;, s 9-~ ~ 9 - ca ~ LEX J MBUS ! ! ! SITE ENGINEERING, INC. ® CMdA k A1M[YOgS d ~ PRELIMINARY PLAN ! ! ! . LlmEb olyp 'uIIG^Q ~ pp0~ alllnupJSj-u11GnQ 'teafll 5S8£ 8 3orvii,v~ivaruo3uHOav u' sn9wn-~o~ ~o ~nx3-~ a ~ ® a.. o uoge~odio~ ~T~lN3~ uopon~1suo~ , , ~NIG~1116 ~b'p CI8Nf110-~cJd 6 ~ ~ a iaiuad ~ ~ ~ i I - G L. _ _ __._1 - 1= 'I I: - ,.a ~ I? g, v yea ~a r 1_;~ _ oa wi; ~:ss~axs a g~ri ~ ~ ~g I° a~~ I ~I~i~g d ~ ~j :d:5g.g 9~~. 41dvev .~s. `!y,~4~ c~ UW Y5~~ gg 8 a-~~ ~°njA R gg~{~{b i 88 _ g c~ IV eR~Y:n R45~Ytt~i o 5 ~ g~g 3 d ~ e Ii ~ ~ 9 ~ 21 S) e ~ ,~L___~~-_ 0 H 021 3 l l I ~ N y~ e ~ 0"_ N 1 ~ 9 !1 0 y ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ - _ ~ _ as ~e =j ` - ~ ~ _s f__ _ '3 ~ ~ ~ ~..~„~d ~ I I I, - I _ I s i _ ~ - - I -'---_I_~„x i K I ~ °~~5, I I--_ I I b ~ d I ~ ~ ! r ~ ~o ~ ~ ; ~ 3 ~ is ~fi,°, ~ J i I ~ ° C ~ r I r & I . o z 1 1 I 'o I ~~4 W 1 3 a-e--i ~ I ~ r a r e- I ~:a~ Z 1 _ j ~ ~ i' ! ~ 'm G st Q ~i W 1° - a I ~ I w~ I g I U r i ~ i I Z Z I i' I I a z 11 1 1' " a~, ~ ~ I ~ I I r a ~ J ~1 1 1 r ~ ~ yyy I ` F ~ 1.` 1 ~ ~gg ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I O m x ~ ~ 1'1 _ 1 °a I D i \ s° ~ I - p } ~1° 111 _ `I- I I > ' ~ / a~ ~ O m1 11~~1 T- . it a~ .a 3 m~ 1 S ~ti i ~ ~ Z, 111 k ~ ~ ~ / / `-~~/I var 1 j~ 7 y 1V' ~r ~ gg ~ ®r~ d~L1I ~IHd~2I~Od0,L ~ s~ W ~ ~ ~ _ ~7 ~+n~7i~T~1~7 ~s~'as saonsnans a sa33woaa oNinnsr+o~ ® ~ ~ S1 1 Q Y V.1 1 l Q.J ~7 0 ~J! 1X,1 1 c~ ~NI ~~II2i~~I~II~rI~ ~,LIS ~ a ~ ~ fO Z LL - F O ,;i~= moo¦s~.' ~a.vo~ I~~~II ~ c - _ _ _ S. DoE i \~2 JF~ m o '1 a s3 ~ - ~ _ _ I ? -0 b 0 b 3 l l I ~ N b N J N i ~ e n a e _ - u ~ ~N ~l; R ` ...T N 0-.w. v elf ~I fie-- ! :1 .,F ~ Y~o„ r~ &_,y~ ~a",.°,~3 w.a m.-_ / 8s I ~rir I ~ o t .l . w74.. ~\\d +,y....,Qe ~ I11 =il~, I }~~a1 b'~- ~ (.wcrm n PF ~ ..5 i +i. J $ r J 311 I 4= 5 °I II I ~ ~ I ~ i ~ - x . k : y l~ ay - I G': •IS ' ,ill G( I ~ ~ ii 1>{ :3s ~ -~-1 ~ ~ ' ~ I S. a j ~ ~I ~~I I so I ~ I~ I Z1 •r ~N ~ ~ p~ I f Y 1L- ~ a - ~ I' i `I w d~ .~,a ~ i ,i ~I 1 - - 1N ~ y u- -t ~ - I ~ ~ f~ m, J .s i 1 y Imo, 3 I ~ ~ ~s . ~ ~ • - m s -1- ~ i 1 ~ _ E , 1 \ X75 ? ieb i~~~i j BUY =ii \ Y k~OG~~ i- ~}j}~ ~{t~~~!! o t i~'#~~ ~t~1} NV`Id 9MQV2i~ ~LIS g ~ ~ = N a ow n ® ~ ~ ie~ ~a~s < ' 3 w >o snsi~n~oo ~o snx~z ~ s a '~1~II `~l1I2I~~rII~rI~ ~,LIS ~ $ - s W~ ~a a d~ J s a w ~ z ~ - sSR~=~ ~ ~ i9 3t 2~2 ~e oY ~ gp iMa*w e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 fi$ ~6i f t4 ~6 „ 3~ bF ~ i ~ ~ ~ Z~~~~ - a - iii _ - Neao° _ z ° ~ - N i ~ a n a = ~ •~a~ `w~x°'°w° I h - .,T ~~ll _ 1-' _ --1'-~__ °°°d r°..,q jj o rrr- °d I ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ , errs _ I awp io v ' " I JtA""~,.u- o,~ t I 1 / 1'1 'I ~ ~"_ww_~..'w..'-'? ' ~ '1.~, ,~T;' "iw" I I ~I i ~ -f- - _ t_ I ' _ d ~1 I ~rl~. II~ aye ~ ~ I~ 1 I 1-,_I i ~ I i ~ ~ ~ I~~ ~ 09'LO6=did I. - a :~C ~ a~ 1 Itt--_-J ,~~-r-f d I e~H a~ , -.~a>< IV ~ ,,r d I t--- l y l I~ a ~>31 Y( ~ W I • s a3vio-aa~a aasoa~oaa ~ 1 • ti .RqB 1 111 :U I I ~Q I I~lJ ' ~ ~ .e « ~ , F' i d (--5 / L_ 1 a a~"O ~ I I ~ Y"' iS ~ •.'s;'°ya .o g t ~ I ~ ° I -Cvj R y .dad p 1t 111Y=~~ bt; ___i l ~ I ! ~~y _ ~i a ya ~ ~ Z Ir-- ~-,I 1, I Imo z 1 t e xvxwm v3 .s. ~xo~ f 8~~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ R ytl fr f, _ I 4 ` 1 ~y € 1 Ill t`'--t ~ 1~~ - "-fi°' Lg ~ I~- r ~ U 8 § a ,~Vt ~ 1~~ ``I ~ Y3 ~ _ ; aj=~ O gp~ I ~ j m ~ m a ~ 1 ~ n I ¢ 1 -----I AY: .k N - " ° o ~ ~ ~ ,~4 ~ i7 _ 1 • 5 B5 i .tea - ~ e1^= s,~~ua6 r 7p ~ pryo°' ~d - `-jrie S T ~\fTtE - Myt'n R N ° i s ;nrt{s ~B ` ~ y7 0 _ 21. iS V.r~ / Jr~'°t .715 pg. yyy0 2 0~~~o°pp - - abb~;: 8 rr p02252' CS ,R-°3~b 3HC Sd~a°>°~_°- iE Sy.!? 3 ~pe1 ~ =.x~ ~ s: s16, LLO£4 OIyQ'llllgfl4 g sruszslr~mna rrwezsoie~:~ue pe0a aIIInUeI~-Wigna 1S2M S88£ i g"I I I I q aun auo '•^w~aa z«sz .oe oe 444 © 4 J a snawn~o~ ~o snx~~ ~wa~lna ads a3w~no-3ad ~ a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;i _ _ : o v Z£IQ'~i ii ¢n ~s I~'~'y ~ 'ILL J ``I 3 xs ~ use :a LLai ^a s a=_ _ a _ _ ai x s_svs _ ^aaa~ _a E~,. a E~~ Pr~~a 9 saFa ~ ~ sas t ~ .g ~~rg~~ gggg88gggg gg gggggg pp y i ~~.t ~ ~ ~a i tld99 S6¢5 88d i36 i~ i 'i i i 4C.Xili¢"i ¢f6 i 6tit ,2p i3 ttY€~i ~ ~ t~ tz F~S2ppY~~ i ~ $Si ~ ~"i~ ff 9E S pF ~ 5 ~ ~ o ~ az 54~F~~ € ~ s ~F 3 3 33 o5LL $ $y! F i q- _ _ .:a za a - a x t to as a ^asecr ~~~3E~~ F 8 ?S (~s~as) avoaan~nHVao-N~ieno r • ;i ~ _ ~ ,I _ ~ ' a R ~ I,y C~ malt' ~ ~ t p~e i f ~ i L I~ i ~'S p p l,t V eli~ ~ - e I ..4zu II ~ ~ top 4 ~ A.[i~ 3 1 R t^ V o ~ _ ; s~ II f py 'B 4l - v r $ m .a ~ E$ ~ a sr'~~ 5~ I 3 ~5 a_~ 9 ~ may` ' t ~ i a/. a~~ 3~ ~ [i,. i. e 1 - _ _ OIyQ 'ui~gnp c.~aazso~m =.e m~azs ~~w~:«iwa L LO£4 8I I I I I azm «a 's~w•aao u~az .ae o a ~ § ~a ~ snawnio~~ ~o snx~~ .iii © _ ~ J ~ ~Nia~ina av~ a3wwo-aaa ~ . o a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 0 ~ i a ~ g,Yy7 ~ ~ 3333 333 a 9a~'§ ~~~~8$~~~~ &z 8 Tia~an~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 4 3 ~ e d ~ ~ ~ u ~ d t ~y ~ ~g ~ jE~as ~ b b b b « a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A B ~ g b ~ x ~ c~~y ~ ~ 3 a x R~ :g a b ~ W g~ g x 3~ ~ ~ a Y y~y~ ~ t~ =~~3 m'~O rte.-~~~`~ ~'~`.~~~5~~'Y~c Y~ ~R3~ Q i 5 d~ ,y,y~~ ~ E I Y 'W. 3 ~ y~ § - - -~--i B ~ ~ ~a~ ~dsia,si~ 3 ~ _ _ x R P 9 e 3 ~ 3 @ @ ~ f ` a ~ ,~~nan° _ 3 _ ~ ~ 1 [ I _ ~ _ / 22 _ _ a ~ 3: i s ~ I a3 8 _ ~yi E i I' s; ~ f ~ I 3 ill ~ j _ _ - ' x' n i . aY~ , 1 3 ~ r 1 1 ' pao L ~ e. FB .r f ~ S > 1 i ~ - q ~ ~ F. L ~ w _ W 1 ~ % , ~s i ~ p~ ~ ~3 / I ~1 1 Y Z ~ ~ i o ~ ~ . : _ m ~ =a Ei ~ i~ ~g u~'~ 5~a . _ ayart ' ~ / GE ENE e \ ~Z~ ~~~~~tONER1D ~ - i ti ~ / 1 F~ C i~+' ~ ~ ~ ~it~ ~ , -HA ~ ~,E $ ~F?? . ~ MPR~K 8~E ~ r R Pa"+ \ ~ 9~c 3U/ tYra 'z % ~ o0 Y Bow alUnu9~rj-ui~gnd le~f11 588E ..-^:::;.y ~",l; ~ <o 3~Ntlilly ~lVtlfl1~31M~iltl d ~n9wmo~ ~nx~7 ~ a a ~ ~and~~ a $ uopeiodio~ ?O~ilV3~ ~NIG~In9 Zl7~ G~I\f110-3Z1d ~ ~g I ua~oru;suo~ a o ~ a m e ~aiuab i o ® ~ m 0 ~ s u 0 w 0 ~ - a i 0o I I ~ Q o 0 00 _ ~ o ~ a I - I - I - - ° ~ ~ s _ a ~ a I n ~ o ~ o ,I rc ~ I a z O O oe s ~ ~ ~ f. m O ~ X Z o ~ Q' I I ~ ~ V ' ~ ~ ~ arli I - 4 _J ~ a a z 0 0 o° m~ ~e N~ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ~ i~ Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 9 3. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 00-0282 -Lexus/Griffith - 3849, 3859, & 3885 West Dublin-Granville Road Location: 4.93 acres located on the southeast corner of West Dublin-Granville Road (SR 161) and Dublin Center Drive. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development, and SO, Suburban Office and Institutional Districts. Request: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: A freestanding, 3,800 square foot, pre-owned auto dealership building addition to an existing 20,113 square foot auto dealership. Applicant: Donn W. Griffith, 3859 West Dublin-Granville Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017; and Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., 5777 Scarborough Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio 43232; represented by J. Thomas Mason, Vorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, 52 East Gay Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216. Staff Contact: Chad Gibson, Planner. BACKGROUND: The western 2.59-acre portion of the site is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, for an auto dealership. The eastern 2.3 acres is zoned SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District, and has been in use for many years for veterinary services. A final development plan was approved for the Lexus dealership in 1988. The existing dealership has been in operation since 1989, and that western portion of the site is fully developed. A revised development plan for the existing dealership was approved in September of 1997 to permit a 3,500 square foot building expansion (See Record of Action 97-113CDD/RFDP). This is a rezoning application to construct a new 3,800 square foot, freestanding building on the veterinary clinic site. The proposed text permits several uses including automotive sales and ancillary automotive services, general retail, office, restaurant, and "special events." This new building will be utilized by Lexus to sell "pre-owned" vehicles. Following a recommendation by the Planning Commission, a public hearing and vote will be scheduled at City Council. Atwo-thirds vote is required to overturn a negative recommendation from the Commission (a majority vote is required otherwise). If approved, the rezoning becomes effective 30 days after passage. Prior to construction, a final development plan must also be approved by the Commission. It should be noted that the staff advised the applicant not to file a concept plan. Given the overwhelming commercial nature of the area and the complete availability, of utilities, etc., it did not seem to be a useful step as outlined in the PUD process. CONSIDERATIONS: Site Characteristics/Land Use: • The site is 4.93 acres located on the southeast corner of West Dublin-Granville Road (SR 161) and Dublin Center Drive. The site has additional frontage on Stoneridge/Marcy Lane at the rear. Essentially, the sites are being combined into Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 10 one plan for an enlarged auto dealership. Current improvements include an existing automobile dealership of 20,113 square feet (Lexus), and a veterinary clinic/health food store (Griffith) in converted houses. The site is relatively flat, and the veterinary clinic portion of the site is heavily wooded with mature trees. There is a large satellite dish located behind the health food store. • The subject site includes six long narrow parcels. The western three are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District for an auto dealership, and the eastern three are zoned SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. The six parcels average about 550 feet of depth and 85 feet of width on SR 161. • The site is wrapped on three sides by roads with 500 feet of frontage on SR 161, 570 feet on Dublin Center Drive, and 350 feet on Stoneridge/Marcy Lane (present and future). The existing auto building is situated toward the northwest portion of the site, adjacent to Dublin Center Drive. Parking for the dealership is on the north, west, and south sides of the building. Automobile display areas are located along SR 161. The veterinary clinic and health food store are located toward the northeast portion of the site, about 50 feet apart, close to SR 161. • To the east is Dublin Sawmill Center zoned CC, Community Commercial District. To the north across SR 161 is the Fifth-Third Bank building, also zoned CC. To the west across Dublin Center Drive are the Gordon Foods store and medical offices zoned PUD. To the south across Stoneridge/Marcy Lane is the Dublin Christian Church zoned R-4, Suburban Residential District. • The proposed text states all uses within Section 153.056(D) [PUD], exclusive of residential dwellings, laboratory/research facilities, and hotels/motels are permitted. This includes retail centers, offices, and restaurants. Motor vehicle dealers, including automotive service, retail sales of automotive accessories, ancillary food, beverage, non-retail fuel sales, and special events are also permitted by the proposed text. A veterinary clinic and animal hospital are listed as conditional uses for the eastern half of the site. Staff believes the text should be much more restrictive, perhaps permitting auto dealerships. • The text commits to the removal of the existing houses within one year following zoning approval. Reuse of residential buildings for commercial purposes have been repeatedly discuraged as a policy, and such reuse should also be clearly prohibited in the text. • The proposed text permits a maximum of 70 percent total lot coverage (exclusive of right-of--way) for the Griffith property only. Lot coverage for the existing Lexus dealership is at least 77 percent, and it is legally non-conforming in this case. Staff recommends a maximum of 70 percent lot coverage for the combined site area. Staff also recommends that existing landscaping located along the current property line be retained to achieve this goal and provide a degree of site separation. • To the west of the subject site are the Sharp Property and David Road neighborhood. Both of these sites were denied automobile dealerships, at least by the Commission, as a permitted use (99-127CP and 99-052Z). Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 11 Access Considerations/Traffic Management: • The existing auto dealership has two full-service cuts along Dublin Center Drive and aright-in/right-out curb cut along SR 161. This proposal retains the northernmost access point on Dublin Center Drive. Staff recommends that the southern access along Dublin Center Drive be retained instead of the northern access. Existing access to the veterinary clinic and health food store is from the two original residential driveways along SR 161. Access along SR 161 will become restricted to right-in/right-out when the road is widened with a median design (next year). Proposed access to the site includes a single right-in/right-out curb cut along SR 161 and a "future" curb cut at Stoneridge/Marcy Lane. • A condition of the original 1988 rezoning for the auto dealership required the dedication of right-of--way (56 feet from centerline) on SR 161 in conformance with the Thoroughfare Plan. This is consistent with other rezonings for the last 15 years. Additionally, property owners to the east and west dedicated 50 feet of right-of--way at the rear of their parcels and constructed respective sections of Marcy/Stoneridge Lane. Right-of--way along the SO property has not been dedicated. ODOT was forced to use eminent domain for the SR 161 frontage, and Dublin was in the same position regarding the missing section of Stoneridge/Marcy Lane. Neither land "take" has been settled yet. The service road is now under construction, and the ODOT project will not be delayed. An additional requirement of the auto dealership rezoning was to provide cross access to the eastern parcels upon redevelopment for access to left turn opportunities. This has been provided in the plan. • The final plans for the upcoming SR 161 improvement project show existing access points to the site being reconstructed at their present locations. This road improvement plan must be revised to reflect the proposal. The proposal shows a right-in/right-out access onto SR 161 located at the northeast corner of the property. • Both sites are comprised of three original lots. Each site will combine its three parcels. The Lexus Dealership proposes to lease the three eastern parcels (ten- year lease) and have them function as one site. There is no provision in the text for the ultimate combination of the two sites. • The text outlines three "phases" of development. First, the existing structures will be removed from the eastern site, and the site will be paved and used for parking and auto display. Secondly, the proposed building will be constructed within 30 months of zoning approval. Finally, if the eastern property becomes totally separate from the existing dealership, a conversion plan will be .initiated. It involves the installation of some green space between the two sites and relocating storm water facilities. Site Layout/Parking/Architecture • The existing dealership building was sited incorrectly and is set back approximately 80 feet from proposed SR 161 right-of--way, and the approved plans showed about 106 feet. The required parking setback for the initial Lexus Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 12 development along SR 161 was 34 feet from the proposed right-of--way based on 112 feet of right of way. Due to this siting error, the existing parking encroached into the setback. This setback is substantially broader at the corner. A reduction in drive aisle width and parking space length mitigated this error substantially in 1997, and it is 23 feet at the closest point. • The proposed parking setback from SR 161 is 24 feet which widens to 34 feet at the eastern termination of the display area. The existing veterinary clinic is set back 75 feet, and the house is set back 24 feet from proposed SR 161 right-of- way. The proposed new dealership building is shown 116 feet from the right-of- way. • Required parking for an auto dealership is based on one space per 300 square feet of total building area (80) plus one space per 1,000 square feet of auto display area (17). The existing dealership has 146 parking spaces. However, functionally, there is not enough parking. The Lexus dealership currently uses a parcel behind the Sawmill Center for off-site storage of vehicles. Additionally, its employees park on Stoneridge/Marcy Lane. The proposal reconfigures the parking and adds 162 spaces. There will be a total of 308 parking spaces on the combined sites. • Pavement within the parking areas should meet the City Engineer's requirements for strength, durability, and geometric elements. Turning movements of waste hauling and emergency vehicles must be accounted for in designing curves and turning radii. The drive approaches within the public right-of--way shall meet Dublin's Engineering standards. • The finished floor elevation of the existing dealership is 906.9 feet, and the proposed dealership is shown at 907.5 feet. The new finished floor elevation and lot grading will need to be coordinated with the Dublin Sawmill Center as well. • The text states that the maximum height of the new building shall not exceed 30 feet. • Elevations of the proposed buildings have been submitted, and continue the design/materials of the existing dealership. Architectural commitments have been made in the text to this end. Exterior building materials will consist of concrete block with "STO" E.I.F.S (Lexus -classic gray color scheme). The glazing will be black anodized metal with one-inch tinted glass. The architecture and materials will be subject to final development plan review by the Commission prior to construction. Landscaping/Tree Preservation: • Due to the size of the expansion, the proposal must demonstrate compliance with the Landscape Code for the entire site. The proposed landscape plan is deficient in interior landscaping. The landscape plan must include a plant list showing quantities, species, installation size, etc. The proposed 3.5-foot high mounding along the east property line will result in a slope greater than 3:1. The landscape plan and grading plan must match, and there is no mounding shown along that property line. Staff recommends the use of evergreen shrubs or an opaque fence u Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 13 or wall rather than the mounding. This will be considered further at the final development plan stage. • There are a large number of mature trees on the site. All trees six inches in caliper or greater must be replaced on an inch-per-inch basis. A preliminary tree survey indicated 160 trees at six inches or greater. The field verification indicated this survey was not performed correctly. A revised survey is forthcoming. A tree preservation plan and tree replacement plan must also be submitted as soon as possible. Grading and utility placement must be sensitive to the existing trees. • In a vehicular use area at an auto dealership, the Landscape Code requires one large or medium shade tree (minimum 3-inch caliper) per 30 feet along the entire street frontage, plus a 3.5-foot (average height) continuous fence, wall, hedge, planting, or earth mound along at least 75 percent of the street frontage. The remaining 25 percent of the street frontage may be used as a display area, and it requires a 12-inch high vegetative planting plus perimeter trees (large or medium shade trees). The proposed display area must be accurately dimensioned on all site drawings. S ignage/Lightin g/LTtilities: • The existing dealership has one wall sign and one ground sign. There is also directional signage on the dealership site. One new wall sign is shown for the proposed dealership facing SR 161 ("Lexus -Pre-Owned"). If the uses become totally separate at a future date, the text provides for an additional ground sign oriented toward Stoneridge/Marcy Lane. Two additional directional signs are also proposed. Staff believes the site functions as one dealership and should meet the sign Code on its own. • Water supply to the site can be provided by a 24-inch water main located along the south side of SR 161. This existing water main is to be relocated approximately 20 feet south of its present location as part of the SR 161 improvement project. • Sanitary sewer service to the site can be provided by a 10-inch sewer located v- along the north side of SR 161. Open cuts of the existing roadways will not be permitted. The project will be required to meet the requirements of the current Stormwater Regulations. • No preliminary stormwater calculations have been submitted for review. A detention area is shown at the southwest corner of the site. The text states that if the sites become divorced, the detention area will be moved to the Griffith property. Staff believes this provision should be removed from the text. • All new lighting should meet Dublin Lighting Guidelines. This commitment is not contained in the text. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This is an existing auto dealership in operation which desires to expand in a largely commercial area. Staff recommends approval of the PUD preliminary development plan with nine conditions: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -May 18, 2000 Page 14 Conditions: 1) That the total site area not exceed 70 percent lot coverage; 2) That the text be revised to limit the use of the site to an auto dealership; 3) That the text and plans be revised to eliminate the northern access point on Dublin Center Drive and that the cut align with the Gordon Foods access to the west, subject to staff approval; 4) That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the "fourth" sign along Marci/Stoneridge Lane; 5) That the plans and text be revised to provide adequate green space/separation between the two buildings; 6) That the text be revised to eliminate the 30-month period as a parking lot on the eastern parcel; 7) That a revised tree survey, a tree preservation plan, and tree replacement plan be submitted prior to scheduling for City Council, subject to staff approval; 8) That a revised landscape plan conforming to Code and the comments contained in this staff report be submitted, subject to staff approval; and 9) That a revised text and plans be submitted within 30 days, subject to staff approval. Bases: 1) The proposal provides for the expansion of a successful business in Dublin. 2) The text, as modified above, limits the land use to an automobile dealership. . .wr Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 9 DRAFT 3. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan 00-0282 -Lexus/Griffith - 3849, 3859, and 3885 West Dublin-Granville Road Chad Gibson presented this rezoning application to construct a 3,800 square foot preowned auto sales building on the vet clinic site. It will expand the Lexus PUD. The text addresses both sites. The Griffith site will be leased by Lexus for ten years. Mr. Gibson showed a variety of slides. The five acre site is located on the southeast corner of SR 161 and Dublin Center Drive. The western half is an existing car dealership zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and the eastern half has two houses that were converted to a vet clinic and associated uses zoned SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. The Lexus dealership is constructed of gray EIFS, and its architecture will be repeated on the new building. There are a number of mature trees on the Griffith site. The text proposes to demolish both houses within one year of an approved zoning. In the proposal, the existing tree row between the two sites will be removed. Mr. Gibson said the staff would like to relocate the access point on Dublin Center Drive to the north of its present location. For safety, the drive nearest to the intersection should be eliminated. He said signage includes the existing ground sign on SR 161 and a "Lexus of Columbus" wall sign. The proposal adds one additional wall sign on the new building. Mr. Gibson said the text proposes three phases of development. Phase 1: For 30 months, the Griffith site will be cleared and used as an auto lot. Stormwater detention is shown at the southwest corner of the existing Lexus site. Phase 2: A 3,800 square foot building will be built, retaining the display area along SR 161. The northernmost curbcut along Dublin Center Drive will be retained as proposed, and access to SR 161 will be right-in/right-out. Phase 3: A separation of the two sites with the stormwater detention area being relocated. The proposal includes a 70 percent lot coverage maximum on the Griffith site and maintains 77 percent lot coverage on the existing Lexus site. Widening SR 161 will eliminate some green space. Staff supports bringing the entire site to 70 percent coverage and narrowing the permitted uses in the text. Staff is also concerned about the 30 months of "parking lot only" use. Mr. Gibson said some of the Griffith trees are not in good shape. A revised landscape plan and tree survey are needed. He said staff recommends approval with nine conditions: 1) That the total site area not exceed 70 percent lot coverage; 2) That the text be revised to limit the use of the site to an auto dealership; 3) That the text and plans be revised to eliminate the northern access point on Dublin Center Drive and that the cut align with the Gordon Foods access to the west, subject to staff approval; . 4) That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the "fourth" sign along Marcy/ Stoneridge Lane; 5) That the plans and text be revised to provide adequate green space/separation between the two buildings; 6) That the text be revised to eliminate the 30-month period as a parking lot on the eastern parcel; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 D~ Page 10 7) That a revised tree survey, a tree preservation plan, and tree replacement plan be submitted prior to scheduling for City Council, subject to staff approval; 8) That a revised landscape plan conforming to Code and the comments contained in this staff report be submitted, subject to staff approval; and 9) That a revised text and plans be submitted within 30 days, subject to staff approval. Mr. Gibson said this applicant has been very cooperative in trying to find common ground. Mr. Fishman asked about the 26-foot mistake on the building setback. Mr. Gibson said the original Lexus dealership building was built 26 feet closer to the SR 161 right-of--way than it should have been. The parking setback was partially corrected to conform to Code, and this proposal would continue that parking setback in the front. Mr. Gibson said a jog in the circulation aisle needs to be avoided. The site meets or exceeds Code on its western side. Mr. Fishman noted that there was a wall sign and a monument sign. Mr. Gibson said the Commission approved this as part of the PUD final development plan. Mr. Gibson said the retention pond in the back was dry. If the sites become separated in the future, the detention facility will be relocated to the east, and this will also be a dry pond. He said staff prefers a no-phase plan and would like to see retention of the existing tree row. He understood some cross access would be necessary for separate uses, but the landscaping would be much more pleasing aesthetically. Mr. Gibson said the existing dealership has a ground sign and a wall sign. An additional "Lexus Pre-Owned" wall sign on the new building, plus a ground sign along Marcy Lane are proposed. He said the applicant has agreed to remove the fourth sign option from the text. Mr. Lecklider asked if the new wall sign complies with Code. Mr. Gibson did not know. Mr. Lecklider said he saw this as one use, whether the parcels were combined or not. He asked how many wall signs were permitted. Mr. Gibson said if it is one site, either two wall signs or two ground signs were permitted by Code. The maximum size for a wall sign is 80 square feet, and the maximum size for a ground sign is 50 square feet. The Commission reviews all PUD signs. Ms. Salay thought it was overkill to have the wall sign and ground sign so close together. She would prefer monument signs out front Ms. Boring asked if there were regulations regarding the number of cars displayed. Mr. Gibson said the Code permits 25 percent of the frontage to be used for auto display, with aone-foot (rather than 3.5 foot) vegetative screen. Ms. Boring noted previous complaints about the dealership parking on the street. Mr. Gibson noted the parking lot behind Dublin Sawmill Center is full of Lexus vehicles, and a number of employees are parking in the public right-of--way. When Stoneridge Lane is extended, the parking will need to cease. Ms. Boring wanted off-site parking addressed in the text. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 DRAFT Page 11 Mr. Lecklider said in a previous request for expansion, there was much discussion regarding the car display, particularly on the mound. The Commission was assured that would stop, but it continues. He noted that other car dealerships store cars off-site, sometimes miles away. Ms. Salay said she had seen a car carrier in process of unloading on Dublin Center Drive. It was very difficult to maneuver around it. The right-of--way should not be used for that purpose. Mr. Gibson said land was acquired from Lexus for the SR 161 widening project. Ms. Boring understood, but repeating non-compliant narrow setbacks was not the answer. It would not look good. There are ways to design for traffic flow including the normal setbacks. She noted a lot of money .was being spent to improve the look and function of SR 161 with boulevarding, etc. Ms. ` Boring said Condition 1 addresses the greenspace, provided the applicant agrees. Ms. Boring said Dublin does not want SR 161 turning into a "Car City." There was some discussion about the sizes of other auto dealerships in Dublin. Mr. Gibson said in order to maximize the available storage space on site, the detention pond will be moved to the Griffith site if Phase 3 is initiated after the ten-year lease period. He said 308 parking spaces are proposed. The Lexus dealership now has 146 spaces, and another 160 spaces are to be added. This meets Code, but there may still be too little parking functionally. Mr. Lecklider asked what was staffs concern in regarding the 3:1 sloped landscaping on the eastern boundary line. Ms. Newcomb said a 3:1 slope is the maximum for a moveable slope. Tom Mason, attorney for Germain, said staff raised many of the Commission's questions. They have been working with staff to address these problems. He said it would be hard to pick up the building and move it. However, most issues can be mitigated, but the site is quite constrained, even after the expansion. They have trouble with trucks and parking, and they want to address the needs of this dealership that has outgrown its site. He said the Germain dealership is leasing this property for ten years, and they have the opportunity to buy it from Dr. Griffith. He thinks the purchase and Phase 3 conversion are unlikely. Mr. Mason said the Phase 1 parking only lasts for 30 months. They agree to raze the existing buildings on the Griffith property and clean up the site first. Then they will put in asphalt parking to accommodate the dealership needs. He said Phase 3 only happens if the dealership does not exercise its option to buy this land. Given their improvements on the land at that point, this does not seem likely. He said the placement of the building being off by 26 feet was discovered after it was built. The front parking spaces were mitigated by shortening the parking spaces and decreasing the aisle. This concept is being continued across the Griffith site, they think this is very reasonable. The driving aisle has to line up on both sites. . He said they have agreed to eliminate some curbcuts, but they need to maintain their own gateway. Regarding relocation of the stormwater pond in Phase 3, he also felt this was unlikely. It only becomes necessary if the dealership does not purchase the site. They will limit the uses to auto sales and a few others. The center strip of landscaping is not reasonable, but they are relocating what trees they can. He said these changes were all made to accommodate Dublin. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 12 ~ Mr. Mason said they need the northernmost curbcut. The south curbcut lines up with their service bay, not their front door. Regarding the 70 percent lot coverage request, he said the existing dealership is over 70 percent but it is also perfectly legal. Some of the coverage comes from dedicating right-of--way for Dublin's roadway purposes. He asked the Commission to understand that these are needed from a business viewpoint. Rick Germain said the dealership started in 1989. They have done well in this Lexus franchise partly because of the Dublin location. The local customer base is strong. Lexus has been a good business partner for Dublin. Customer satisfaction is their top priority, and they were rated first in the US for this. Two years ago, the showroom was expanded. The parking lot has remained the same and is their top customer complaint. After ten years of negotiating with Dr. Griffith, they finally have this land under contract to handle their expansion. The revenues from pre- owned car sales do not justify construction of a separate building, but their intention is to handle future growth. The landscaping will be greatly enhanced. He believes this plan represents a good balance. He appreciates Dublin's plan for upgrading SR 161. Mr. Mason said the proposed landscaping will blend in with other sites and the dealership. Mr. Hammersmith said SR 161 is a very busy road, and the goal is to place curbcuts as far from it as possible. Any vehicle turning left into the first curbcut will stack up cars behind it on SR 161. Dublin Center Drive does not have a separate stacking lane. He said there was no specific linear separation required in the Code, but a minimum of 250 feet would be his recommendation. Aligning curbcuts is also recommended. Mr. Peplow asked about the parking setback along SR 161; He thought the applicant could fix this problem. Ms. Clarke noted only the front row of parking encroaches on the setback; the drive aisle and the spaces along the building are in compliance with the setback requirements. Mr. Mason noted this is apre-existing use. He said this plan represents a good compromise and maintains the viability of the business. Mr. Gibson agreed and said the required parking setback is 34 feet. The actual parking setback is 34 feet at the east end, diminishing to 25 feet at the west end of the site. Staff tried to understand the dealer's desire to display cars along SR 161, and to find a fair and feasible compromise. Mr. Lecklider asked who was responsible for the siting error. Ms. Clarke said the building permit plans complied with the Planning Commission approval. However, the building was located based on the historic right-of--way for SR 161 (30 feet from centerline), not the right-of- way after the dedication required by the rezoning (56 feet from centerline). She did not think Dublin had discovered this error until the building was complete. The building more than complies with the setback. . Mr. Lecklider noted that this siting error was made by the dealership through its agent. Mr. Fishman agreed. He said the dedication of right-of--way was connected to the rezoning. Ms. Clarke noted that Mr. Germain was not compensated for the right-of--way. ~m _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 13 Mr. Peplow said the phasing plan was a problem to him. He did not like the asphalt-only Phase 1 which could be in place for 2.5 years. He also thought the overall site should not exceed 70 percent lot coverage. He said he liked the building. Mr. Mason said the 30-month period was reached based to their business plan and the widening timetable for SR 161. Mr. Eastep said he could not support the three-phase proposal. The parking lot is very problematic and is inappropriate for a gateway. He wanted it to be very clear with commitments, not maybes. This has not been approved elsewhere. Mr. Mason said their plan is solid. Mr. Eastep said the mature trees should be incorporated into the development plan. This plan is not sensitive to the site, area, or the natural conditions. A landscape buffer would make sense from the outset. It only eliminates a limited number of parking spaces. This site is very prominent in the community. He said the landscpe plan in their packets did not include any stone walls or the other amenities presented verbally. Their plan is only a landscaping concept, and the overall plan is premature. He said it needs more consideration by the applicant. There are too many variables to expect a vote tonight. Mr. Mason apologized for landscape plan not being submitted beforehand. It was developed after receiving comments from staff of their application. He said they will be happy to work out the details of any conditions through the staff. Mr. Lecklider was concerned about permitted uses and asked about "special events." Mr. Mason said this was eliminated due to staff concerns. They will limit it to just a dealership if that will solve the problem. He thought limiting the site to just one use, especially in this retail corridor, was not logical. Mr. Lecklider read the broad list of uses in the text. Mr. Lecklider said he appreciated the feedback. He suspected the reason for limiting the use to authomobile was to require any other user to return to the Commission for approval. Mr. Mason disagreed with Conditions 1, 3, 5, and 6. He said the curbcut; their proposed lot coverage of 73 percent; the greenspace requirement between the buildings; and the 30-month phased building are issues. Ms. Salay could not vote for this amount of signage. She hoped they would be brought into compliance with Code. This is a gateway to the community, and it has too much eye clutter. Mr. Mason said the rendering was not a fair representation of the sign and apologized for it. Ms. Salay said an inaccurate rendering makes it difficult to vote. Mr. Mason said the signage complied with Code. The intent of the rendering was to show landscaping, not to mislead. Ms. Boring said the road improvements underway make their monument sign more visible. Steve Germain wanted to clear the record about the building location. It was not done on purpose. He said the building was pinned by Hockeden Associates and the footers were poured Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 14 and inspected by the City. He was informed that the inspector was fired later. He later made restitution for the mistake through a contribution to the Parks Department. Mr. Germain said they planned this for ten years with Dr. Griffith, and Dublin repeatedly encouraged them. They could always walk away and leave the Griffith site as it is. The Germains have been great Dublin corporate citizens, and they love Dublin. He has worked for years on this with Ms. Clarke. They have afirst-class organization and are committed to this community. He wanted this plan to be considered as presented. He said they cannot relocate their main entrance to the back of the building. That is not consistent with their image or the quality cars they sell. He thanked the Commission for its time and consideration. Mr. Fishman appreciated Mr. Germain's remarks. Many residents called him about the last Lexus hearing, and residents do not want SR 161 to become a car strip because it is a gateway. He said the Germains had a good point, but they are asking for many things that would set a bad precedent. The 26 feet is a mistake he did not want it repeated. Mr. Fishman suggested a wet pond in front instead because it adds no beauty at the rear. It would be a shame to destroy the landscape strip between the Griffith and Lexus parcels, and with imagination, it could be integrated within the plan. He understood the need to expand, but he cannot support this plan as presented. It is too close to the road and has too much lot coverage. A parking lot for 30 months is not acceptable, it should be greenspace. He noted several other dealerships are more heavily landscaped. He wants it to be spectacular. Mr. Fishman suggested tabling this application so it can be redesigned with Dublin's standards. Mr. Eastep and Ms. Salay agreed. Ms. Salay still had problems with the amount of signage proposed and removing mature trees. It could be done much nicer and without significant impact on the parking. She also supported putting the water feature to the front. She expressed frustration with inaccurate drawings. She appreciated the work put into this for ten years, but it is not yet ready to approve. Mr. Peplow appreciated the applicant's attempt to the refresh this area. If the applicants agreed to the conditions, he could vote positively. The most important issues are Condition 1 and the access. He said the back of the site would be a terrible entrance and suggested alignment with Gordon Foods. He said he supported all of the conditions that staff recommended and did not feel this application should go further tonight. Ms. Boring agreed on the conditions. Mr. Lecklider recognized the applicant's efforts. He understood the siting error was not deliberate. However, he could not support continuing a mistake. His issues were lot coverage, modification of the text, the northern access, phasing, tree preservation, ,and appropriate landscaping for the new site. All site landscaping should conform with Code. Mr. Lecklider said the Commission appreciates this business in the community and would like to see them continue. However, there is discomfort. He said it would be a mistake to approve this application without modifications. The Commission's decisions live on for many years. Mr. i Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 15 Lecklider liked the stone wall along SR 161. He hoped the applicant would come back after working with staff with something the Commission could approve. Mr. Mason needed time to talk with his clients. Mr. Lecklider called a short recess. Mr. Mason said there was a point to tabling this application. This is the application they need to take forward, but he offered several modifications. Regarding the 30-month provision, he said there will be a building built in conformity with the plan within one year. This will go into the text, and will eliminate any concern about a sea of asphalt. He said they will align their curbcut with the existing curbcut at Gordon Foods to address the engineering safety concern. They will eliminate their request for a fourth sign along Marcy Lane. They cannot agree to a 70 percent lot coverage because it eliminates parking which is needed. Mr. Mason requested that the Commission consider this application with these modifications and vote on it this evening. Mr. Gibson said the wall sign meets Code with its secondary and primary images. It was 80 square feet and the logo would be permitted a maximum of 20 percent of that. Mr. Mason said the graphic on the pre-owned building was 53 square feet. Mr. Mason said the building meets the building setback and was not in violation. He said the new parking spaces were designed to align with the parking on the Lexus site that do not meet Code. Mr. Fishman asked if he was willing to eliminate those parking spaces. Mr. Mason said no. He said it did not make economic sense. Ms. Boring asked if he would agree to restrict all other parking and unloading to their lot and not on the street. Mr. Mason said yes. Mr. Fishman was concerned about the vehicles being so close to SR 161 which did not meet Code. He said there had been complaints about the visability of the MAG dealership display on I-270, and this would be making the same mistake. Ms. Boring asked about the height of the proposed stone wall. Mr. Mason said Conditions 7, 8, and 9 in the staff report contemplated making this a legal commitment which he would do. This is consistent with the treatment of other cases. Mr. Mason said eliminating parking spaces might solve the setback problem, but there is no place to replace them. A minimum number of spaces are needed to make this work. Mr. Fishman suggested the site might be too small. Mr. Lecklider said inadequate on-site parking could not justify parking encroachments along SR 161. Mr. Mason did not think a lot coverage of a few percentage points should nullify the plan. Mr. Fishman said the Lexus dealership was too close to the road, and will compound the problem. He said cars can be parked off site. The burden should not be on the City to solve this problem. He suggested there might be other places for the dealership. The Commission is responsible to the citizens of Dublin to assure the site meets Code. Many calls have been received regarding setbacks, the scenic corridor along SR 161, and cost of upgrading it to a Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 16 boulevard. He said the Lexus dealership is good, and its building is attractive, but this is an opportunity to do something exceptional. Mr. Mason said they were not suggesting an all or nothing approach, but there are a few issues remaining. He said this site plan made the most sense for this use. Mr. Fishman noted the applicant will not agree to four of the nine conditions in the staff report, and this is highly unusual. Tonight, other issues have now been raised. He said if the applicant is willing to move the setback back, this would help the application. l Mr. Mason said the parking spaces on the Griffith site will be redesigned to comply with the Code setback. The wall will remain. The existing landscaping between the sites was initially installed as a buffer, but the sites are now being combined. A normal five-acre site would not have a green strip down the center. Their landscape company identified trees that could be saved by moving them, and they are committed to do so. He agreed to work with staff. Ms. Boring asked if staff felt comfortable eliminating Condition 1. Mr Gibson believes it can be met by small adjustments to the site plan. Moving the parking setback on SR 161 will improve lot coverabe. Mr. Mason said it may not quite hit 70 percent lot coverage. Ms. Boring said the landcaping should meet the landscaping ordinance, not the development text. Mr. Fishman said it was clear that staff wanted the landscaping between the two buildings to remain. He was concerned about the side wall of the dealershiip which seems to be a 200-foot blank dryvit wall with an exposed garage door. The trees cover an unattractive view. Mr. Mason said they will preserve the trees and use them on site, and he requested a vote. There was some discussion about the existing buffer and the Code requirements. Mr. Gibson noted the tree parcels will be coninned. Ms. Salay wanted the whole site brought into compliance with the Sign Code which permits two ground signs or two wall signs. Mr. Gibson noted that since this is a PUD, the Commission has the discretion to decide on an appropriate sign package. Ms. Clarke suggested permitting a small ground sign at each drive. Ms. Boring could support that, but she preferred a monument on the back side on Stoneridge Lane. She said buying a Lexus was not an impluse purchase. The Sign Code prevents eye clutter. Signs are for identification, not advertising, and this sign package was excessive. Mr. Eastep agreed. Mr. Eastep asked if the existing "Lexus of Columbus" sign meets Code. Mr. Mason said it was approved approximately three years ago. Mr. Gibson said combining wall and ground signs does not meet Code generally, but it can be approved under a PUD. Mr. Mason said eight sites within one-half mile have combined sign types. Mr. Fishman did not want sign clutter, and he did not believe all the proposed signs were necessary. He also thought the ground sign should be eliminated. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission . . ~ Mir~•utes -May 18, 2000 n ~ 9! F3 r 4 „.T Page 17 1 Mr. Mason thought the sign package may comply with Code, and he was comfortable with it. Ms. Boring said the combination of wall and ground signs was granted three years ago. Mr. Peplow agreed with staff and suggested eliminating the fourth sign. Mr. Lecklider said he could not support a separate sign for the used car sales. He noted there were other outstanding issues such as screeening the east elevation and internal landscaping. Mr. Gibson said part of Condition 3 was that the access onto Dublin Center Drive should be aligned with Gordon Foods. ' Mr. Fishman asked about the tree line. Ms. Clarke did not recall the dealership's eastern wall that will now be exposed. She thought it was not dressed up at all. It has asix-foot wooden fence and the trees, but she was nervous about the appearance of that elevation with no screening. She said once exposed, it may be a visual problem. Mr. Fishman asked if the applicant would agree to leave the significant trees as a buffer. He said there is a garage door at the back of the building. He suggested an island there to buffer the building as a compromise. Mr. Lecklider did not like the proposed sign package. After discussion with his clients, Mr. Mason agreed to a 70 percent lot coverage limit. They also agree to landscape along the eastern portion of the building, including a number of doors and a service bay. He said they will work with with staff. He said it would not be a separate stand- alone landscape island between the buildings, however. Mr. Fishman asked about the preservation of the significant trees between the buildings. Mr. Mason said those cannot be saved. Mr. Fishman said pine trees are needed, and they should be opaque blocking off the building on that side. Mr. Mason said they were limited because of the doors. Mr. Peplow said the service doors should be screened as required. Mr. Lecklider said he would be satisfied if it were subject to staff approval. Mr. Mason agreed to work with staff. Ms. Clarke said service doors require screening, but blank walls do not. Mr. Mason wanted to use the PUD in order to have flexability, and now he is being requested to follow the Code. They are trying to do something that makes sense for all involved, given the space they have to work with. They will work with Dublin on a better approach. Mr. Gibson said the applicant had agreed to meet the 70 percent lot coverage requirement and to work with staff to position landscaping so that the views are blocked from SR 161. The proposed building will block a large majority of view. Mr. Peplow said Condition 5 requires revising plans and text to provide adequate screening on the east side, subject to staff approval. Mr. Fishman said that should be added to the current landscape plan. Mr. Mason agreed. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 18 Mr. Gibson said no on-street parking will be permitted. Ms. Salay did not like the wall signs but understood the pre-owned sales function. She suggested using a monument sign to identify the dealership, deleting the wall sign and using internal signage for the pre-owned area. Ms. Boring could not support that. Mr. Mason said the size of the site was being doubled, and he needed additional identification. It is a 53 square foot attractive sign, and this is a good proposal overall. Mr. Lecklider also had sign concerns. He said this dealership is adequately identified by the "Lexus of Columbus" wall sign and a ground sign. He suggested an internal sign to direct customers to the pre-owned building. It does not need a sign on SR 161. He noted three Commissioners strongly opposed, plus one stated lesser opposition, to the second wall sign. Mr. Eastep said signage was an issue, but the biggest issue was removing the 100 existing trees. They need to be incorporated into the landscape plan. Mr. Mason requested a vote. Ms. Boring asked how high was the stone wall.. Mr. Mason said three feet. Ms. Boring could support a tastefu150 square foot wall sign. Ms. Salay said the wall sign and monument sign were so close together, it was overkill. Mr. Peplow made a motion to approve this rezoning application because it provides for the expansion of a Dublin business, and the text limits the land use to an automobile dealership, with nine conditions: l ) 1) That the total site area not exceed 70 percent lot coverage; 2) That the text be revised to limit the use of the site to an auto dealership; 3) That the text and plans be revised to eliminate the northern access point on Dublin Center ~ Drive and that the cut align with the Gordon Foods access to the west, subject to staff approval; 4) That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the "fourth" sign along Marcy/Stoneridge Lane; 5) That the plans and text be revised to provide adequate screening on the eastern elevation of the existing dealership, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to eliminate "phase one" of the proposed development; 7) That a revised tree survey, tree preservation plan, and tree replacement plan be submitted prior to scheduling for City Council, subject to staff approval; 8) That a revised landscape plan, including the dry laid stone wall as presented at this meeting and the changes to the eastern wall screening plan, conforming to Code and the comments contained in this staff report be submitted, subject to staff approval; and 9) That a revised text and plans be submitted within 30 days, subject to staff approval. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commissio . Minutes -May 18, 2000 Page 19 Mr. Mason agreed to the above conditions. Ms. Boring seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, no; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Lecklider, no; Ms. Salay, no; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Peplow, yes. (Motion failed 3-3; the application will be forwarded to City Council with "no recommendation.") No further motions were offered. Mr. Mason thanked the Commission. Mr. Lecklider thanked Mr. Mason for his patience. Mr. Lecklider took a poll on waiving the 11 o'clock rule that requires four votes. Only three members agreed to waive the rule, and the meeting was not extended. Mr. Lecklider apologized to those who remained so late and announced that no further cases would be heard. s ~ r. ~ . e , HANNA ~~q pR ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~fAY i ~ , . YACDUpFLF ~ ~ ~ . ii 1 i i 3AXH(JRY BLVD ~i BR[Gl~ ~ ; ; ~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i ~ HII11N(}SI~Y RD . 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ f i ` -,i irri TUII.ER RD . TULLER RD JP i ~ o~ys° ~ ~ ~ SIT d ~ ~ ~ DALE DR ;l-~, r'~ A vii F'g0 1 1 BLyD ~ ~ _ ~i 4'S N i) I l-l~~i'^ ] ~ ~ 161 A SA111[IId. I~~ca 1 tytn ~ ~ 1fEST DUHLW DA t ~ r ~ GRANVII.I.I: RD ~ o ~ ' i P 4 YAR'fIN 4 ~E PL LILLY-YAR CT g~DN m ~ ~ uAxrar RD 1s1 ~ _ I a~ r j i ~ ~ I A / D AV ~ ° ~ ~ o / 33 ~ ~ a J a i ~ TUL[F.R 4 1 ~ ~ ~ ~bk DR 00-0282 ~ ~~N vR ~ ( Rezoning/ ~ Preliminary Development Plan ~ Lexus/Griffith 1'~ . _ essrcrsmu .,o II a _ . • R- ~ CC _ - _ C CC 1 ^ ULi.ER CC J R-1 PCD CC U ~CC R-1 CC R C R ~ ' n ~ ~ L- ~ 1 L~ CC E F' CC U ~ 4 r R-4 P p D UD ,6 D~ IN RD ~ I I I J y ~ a~ o ~ GR ~x `R~ E ~E c ~'s`ro~, ® ~ ~ KAYS AVE OHIO DON 00_02gZ ~ Rezoning/ _ Preliminary Development Plan ® C U L U M B Lexus/Griffith - Division of Planning 5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236 ,._.'YOFDU[3LIN Phone: 614-761-6550 • Fax: 614-761-6566 ~ /r ^ ~O To: Chad Gibson, Planner From: Brian Martin, Landscape Inspector ~~/I Date: Apri126, 2000 C./" Re: Lexus/Griflith Meeting On April 26, 2000, I met with Greg Melchior of Urban Environments to review the tree survey submitted for the Lexus/Griffith expansion on Dublin-Granville Road. Originally, the survey only addressed 450 inches of good trees and didn't take.into account any trees not dying or diseased and therefore needing replacement. Greg and I reviewed about half of the trees on site and found that the person who performed the sui`vey counted many trees that were less than six inches as being over six inches. We also looked at all the trees that were labeled as poor and many of the trees labeled as being in fair condition. He will be submitting a revised tree survey to Mary Newcomb as early as Wednesday, May 3 noting the changes we made on the site. Many of the trees will be removed as part of the expansion which will probably be replaced monetarily as there is little green space on the property for planting. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Lexus/Griffith Minutes of Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 1986 Page Fifteen Mr. Geese asked Mr. Klein f he planned to pass t s obligation on t the persons to whom. he would be Belli g the lots. Mr. Klein said that Jen gen/Klein will build th road. Mr. Bowman said that h was concerned that the road might not ge built and that it would be up to the illage to extend it if the roadway was no already there. Parcels "A" and "C" ill be deeded to the V' lage. There was discussio regarding the possibi ity of the Village building the road and then assessing the property owners. Mr. Klein said t t the only objection h had was to the fo lowing, "That the 36' wide east/west c llector be constructed before the develop ent of any portion of lot no. 1", re firing them to put in a road that goes abs lutely nowhere. Mr. Grace mov to table the item unt 1 the next meetin so that Commission members may have an o portunity to review ~ commitments made t the time of the preliminary plat approva . Mr. Geese s conded the motion. The vote w s unanimous in favor of tabling. 6. Rezoning of 3.66 Acres on South Side of W. Dublin-Granville Road, west of Sawmill Road. Ms. Clarke had the following comments: 1. The applicant is requesting a P.U.D. zoning district on the south side of West Dublin-Granville Road. 2. The application in slightly altered form was before the Commission several months ago. 3. The applicant has since been able to expand the site to include an additional .68 acre. 4. The motion at that time was for approval and there was a tie 3-3 vote which meant that the recommendation would have been forwarded to Council. The applicant did not take his application to Council.. He negotiated successfully with the property owner to the west and has expanded the site. 5. The buidling is approximately 20,000 square feet. 6. The parking has been expanded to include some 31 additional parking spaces. 7. The applicant has agreed to build the entire 36' wide service road (north/south). This will require the dedication of right-of-way from the property owner to the west. Staff anticipates that this is something that can be accomplished. 8. There is a right turn in/right turn out curb cut on S.R. 161, and two full- service cust along the north/south service road. 9. The applicant has not submitted a landscape plan. Given the area that is to be devoted to landscaping, staff feels that the landscaping plan as well. as building design should be committed in the preliminary plan stage. ~~-028Z Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan l,exus/~riffith Minutes of Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 1986 Page Sixteen 10. This is a combination of the concept and the preliminary; this is where the rezoning actually will take place. 11. This is consistent with the Sawmill/S.R. 161 Quadrant Plan, and provided those details are available, staff feels that this is an appropriate land use at this location subject to several conditions which include the following: ~ A. Dedication of additional right-of-way along S.R. 161 for a total of 56' from centerline. B. Amendment of combined curb cut notation. C. Confirmation that the shift in the intersection can be properly aligned to the north of S.R. 161. Ms. Clarke described the roadway commitment for this general intersection. It was noted that there is a commitment for the east/west service road on this property. Mr. D. Duros and Mr. B. Withers were present to give information and answer questions. Mr. Duros said that since the last meeting they have met with the Leslie Group and were able to reach an agreement. They have picked up an additional 50', plus an additional 25' dedication from the Leslie Group for the right-of-way along with their 25' dedication and that they have agreed, at their expense, to build the road. Mr. Withers said that with regard to landscaping, that concept-wise they would like to provide a screen around the periphery of the site, the service drive on the south, the service drive on the west, and S.R. 161, which will soften the visual impact of the automobiles (the business is an auto dealership). The concept will be earth mounds with landscaping on top of them and to the side of them. The aggregate ~ height would be in the 30 to 36 inch high range. They would like to have windows through the screens. ' •u/ The problem of the transporter is being addressed by having an extra-wide aisle on the service road. The street trees will be a combination of honey locust and red maple. Around the building there will be adequate ground cover and foundation plantings, etc. They have added parking for 31 cars, bringing the total parking on the site to 190. Previously they had 93,280 square feet; the new plan has 121,055, an increase of approximately 28,000 net square feet. About 12,000 square feet went into parking for the extra 31 cars, and the rest of about 16,000 square feet went into green area. The density issue can also be defined by the ratio of building and paving coverage to the overall. net acreage. They were at 75%; they are now at 66%. With regard to colors, Mr. Withers said that the BMW colors are white, a lot of gray, and an accent color of blue. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Lexus/Griffith Minutes of Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 1986 Page Seventeen Mr. Withers offered a brief description of the building - the composition panels, the windows, the glass, etc. He said that the composition panels would have a porcelain finish on an asbestos- irr. type board. Mr. Amorose said that his main concern was the display area for the cars on the corner, and how it will be addressed as far as the elevation of the cars. Mr. Withers said that the display area would be raised about a foot. Mr. Amorose asked how staff's concerns had been addressed. 1. Dedication of additional right-of-way along S.R. 161. Mr. idithers said that they have been talking in those terms all along. 2. Amendment of combined curb cut location. Ms. Clarke commented that the applicant's note on the drawing said, "access to adjacent property at option of property owner". Mr. Withers said that they clarified that statement by saying at the option of the adjacent property owner and even clarified it further by saying Dr. Griffith. Mr. Amorose asked staff if the intersections along S.R. 161 will align with what is proposed north of S.R. 161. Ms. Clarke responded by saying that it was staff's understanding that what is to the north is not in a concrete state, and in its formative stages 30' to the west should not present a problem. Mr. Reiner said that with regard to the landscaping that he liked the way the corridor views had been handled along S.R. 161. He did say, nowever, that he thought that the applicant would be out of compliance with code if they would leave the bay load display area unbuffered, that it should ~ be buffered with a 3' mound or lantin p g, and since that area will be elevated by one foot that it would have to be mounded to a 4 foot height. Mr. Duros said that if the code says 3' mounding they will commit to 3' mounding. He did say that they would like to keep the display there, and that they would consider lowering the display area, but in any event that the will commit to following the code. Mr. Jezerinac said that he would not want to see a great number of cars stacked in the small area. He cited examples of car dealerships that purposely do not put lines in parking lots so that they can put a greater number of cars in the lots. Mr. Jezerinac asked what the elevation of the building was in comparison to the elevation of the parking. Mr. Withers said that the floor elevation would be raised by about 12". Because some of the mounding areas will not be very wide, Mr. Withers said that in those areas he would like to handle the screening problem with the trees rather than trying to do an earth mound which might complicate their drainage problem. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan r o~,.~inr:~~,~, Minutes of Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission September 16, 1986 Page Eighteen Dr. Griffith said that he had no problem with what was being proposed on the side which would abut his property. Ms. Clarke commented with regard to the display at the same setback as the parking; that if this were a straight zoning district (CC), putting the parking display at the same setback as regular parking would require a variance. She said that staff does not see the auto display as being a normal parking lot; that it is not privileged to extend into the setback; that display of the product is different from parking. Mr. Amorose moved for approval of the request. Mr. Geese seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Jezerinac, yes; Mr. Grace, abstain. 7. Muirfield Phase 30 - Fi 1 Development Plan Mr. Bowman presented the fo lowing background informa ion: 1. This is a tabled item 2. It was discussed inf rurally a couple of months ago; it was discussed t the last meeting of the ommission. 3. There was a great c ncern that the lots were two small; that they w e not buildable; they we e concerned about visibi ty and aesthetics alo Memorial Drive. 4. This particular p an was delivered to staf last Friday. 5. In reviewing the plan the lots have been idened considerably. 6. Memorial Drive as pushed to the west. 7. A number of to s were eliminated along e west property line. 8. There is a net loss of six lots. 9. There are sti ] a few lots that are di ferently configured bu that with the proper desig of the home, they shoul• be able to be built u on in a reasonable manner. 10. Staff did h ve one request. Since e lots have been wide d, staff would request th t the building line along Memorial Drive be 30' rather than 25'. P1r. Rakestraw aid that they had no problem with the building ine change. With regard t lots 1459 and 1462 Mr~Rakestraw said that it as anticipated that the curb cut would be off of the in erior street. Mr. Reiner aid that there is an ex~sting bike path that 1 ops from Davington back towards Av ry that is in proximity/to the school. If that would be the wishes of the Commi Sion, he said that they/would open up that path to Avery Road. He also said that they feel that it shou];d be subject to the sch of board and their comments with reg rd to the safety of the/children crossing the oad at that location. They would s lect a site to go through the association land to Avery Road in proximity to the chool. ~ 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Lexus/Griffith _ 05/12/00 02:46 FA% 7616590 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS PLANNING f~j002/003 . i _ 497 - = ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Meeting Minutes of , - xational cr.vh+~ corv., coo.. o. Forut laa laa~ ~ October 20,:1986 ____________________I9__.-_--- Held-- The regularly scheduled meeting of the Du in Village Council was called _ to order by Mayor Michael L. Close on Monda October 20, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Thornton led the Pledge of Allegiance. M bers of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mayor lose, Mr. Jankowski, Ms. outer, Mr. Rozanski, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Thornt Mr. Sh don, Village Manager, and Mr. Stephen Smith, Law hector were present s were Mr. Bowman, Mr. Harding, Ms. Prushing, an r. Warner of the Vi age Staff. Mr. Amorose m ved to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1 6 Special Meeting of Cou il. Mr. Sutphen seco ed the motion. The vote was unani ous in favor of the motion. Mr. Amorose moved to prove the minutes of the October 6, 1986 meeting f Council. Mr. Rozanski seconded th motion. The vote was as follows: M Amorose, yes; Mayor Close, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Ro anski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Thornton, abstain. Mr. Sutphen moved to approve paym nt of the bills. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Mr. Sutphen inquired about the two bi s for fertilizer and why it was not ~ all ordered from one company. Ms. Prus ing said that it could have been ~ that they were two separate orders by tw different departments but that she would look into the matter further. Responding to a question from Mr. Thornton r arding the damaged fire hydrant, Ms. Prushing said that the Village wo d be reimbursed for their payment of the repair. The vote was unanimous in favor of paying the bill W~r+ orrespondence Th a was no objection to a one day liquor permit for a nction to be hel t 6565 Frantz Road on November 15, 1986, said functi to be sponso ed by the Big Brothers, Big Sisters Association of Co umbus and Frankli County. Mayor Clos commented regarding the issue of handicapped parking \hich was discusse at the last Council meeting. The Law Director had responded in writing to he Mayor. He noted that on review it was noted that~the parking violati is a minor misdemeanor which carries a fine of up t0, $100.00 if anyone ould appear in Mayor's Court. I By Executive Order he handicapped parking violation has been amended to' $50.00 and there is Councilmatic action is required. Public Hearing ' Ordinance No. 15-86 - Rezone 3.66 Acres - Dublin~ranville Road, West of ` v Sawmill Road. There were no registered proponents or opponents. Mr. Bowman said that the applicants had not been in with a landscape plan. ' I He also said that, give approval of the rezoning, the applicants will need to come back with the final building elevation drawings, the final site ~ plan, as well as the full landscape plan. He .also said that there are 'I Corridor Development District review implications concerning the two ij service drives which the applicant has said he will construct, and it ~ f appears that the required additional 25' will be able to be obtained. II ~~-OZOZ ~i Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan ~ M. 1 05/12/00 02:47 FAX 7616590 LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS PLANNING I~j003/003 ' ° 49.3 , - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Village Council Meeting Meeting Minutes of , n~ti 1 National CraphScc Cory.. Cola.. O. Form No. 1097 October_20, _ 1986-----------------------------------------------------•---------- ---------19------- Held-- Page Two \i Responding to a question from Mr. Thornton, Mr. Bowman said that in a P.U.D. the zoning district actually becomes the preliminary plan which includes the text as well as the drawings. The applicant must do exactly what he has represented or the zoning district, the P.U.D. is no longer in effect. The ordinance will lay over for a third reading at the Council meeting on November 3, 1986. Tabled Ordinance) Ordinance No. 58-86 - Land Dedication or a Fee in Lieu Thereof. Third Reading. M Rozanski said that he felt that it was imp rtant that everyone have a cle r understanding of the ordinance; that hew ted to clarify that this ordi nce was in addition to the present green sp ce ordinance, and that it in o ways replaces the previous ordinance. Mayor C1 a also said that he was in agreement; that e original ordinanc would not e at all affected by the passage of this or 'Hance. Mr. Rozanski owed to approve the following amendment. to rdinance No. 58-86: "Under no condi 'on is any land obtained hereunder and used intly with any school distri t to be used for the erection of an educatio al building, storage 'te, bus terminal, administration facility o ~ r non-recreational use ~ Ms. Maurer seconded th amendment. Mayor Close commented tha in fact what the amendment would do would bed e.g., if the school needed 0 acres for a site, it would allow them to acquire perhaps 1.5 to 2 acr to put the physical structure on and then use the rest of the acre a jointly with the municipality. Mr. Rozanski said that he felt t at the land should be used as a recreational facility by the resi nts of the Village and not for a single designated group. Mr. Thornton said that he had a conce that one might want, in the future to put a non-recreational building on p k land (fire house, day care facility, senior citizens home, etc.) an that this amendment could preclude that happening. was suggested that the amendment be viewe as placing restrictions on th uses the Village could have with the schoo district, and that it only revents the Village from putting school-re ated buildings on the sites, but that it would allow the Village to use he land to provide retreat oval facilities adjacent to schools. Mr. Jankow ki said that the amendment solidifies the c ncept of the joint park/ 'llage-type development as is authorized in 55 of the Ohio Revised Code. He said that he liked the ordinance as it ~s, but said 1 I that he did un rstand those members of Council who wish to>solidify the strength of a ordinance. He also did say, however, th~t; he had difficulty with th term "non-recreational use" as to its specific applications. Mr. Rozanski amended h motion to read as follows: "Under no condition is any land obtained her under and used jointly with any school district to be used for the erecti of an educational building, storage site,'. bus terminal, administration facility or other such uses." Ms. Maurer seconded the motion The vote was as follows: Mayor C~ose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen;, yes; Mr. Rozanski, yes; Mr. Thornton,no. I ~~-0282 ~ Rezoning/ Preliminarry~D1 evelopment Plan T l..~..n ~t =i'I r lf' _ _ - .a.~ _ _ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 4 6 9 rlfint<tes of Dublin Village Council Heeting t\feetirlb ~ Nallonal Graphla Corp., Cols., O. Form No~30l7 - ~ I eTci- --------No.rembez._5-.-.1956---- --.19..--. I i The ularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin Village Counc>_ was j called o order by Mayor Michael L. Close at 7:30 P.M. on Mon y, I November 1986. ~ I I Mr. Thornton d the Pledge of Allegiance. ' t Members of Counci present were: Mr. Amorose, Mayor Close, Mr. Jankowsk- Ms. Maurer, Mr. Roz ski, and Mr. Thornton. ~ Mr. Sutphen was absen . 'i I~ Mr. Sheldon, Village Mana er, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also ? present as were Mr. Bowman, Mr. Harding, lls. Jordan, Ms. Prushirtg, and ? i Mr. Warner of the Village Sta f. ~ Mr. Thornton moved to approve the minutes of the October 20, 1986 meeting ~ of the Dublin Village Council. Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. j. he vote was 6-0 in favor of approval: I: - Mr. orose moved to approve paying the bil ' Mr. Jan wski seconded the motion. i' Mayor Clos commented that, for reference, any the bills listed that have an aste 'sk before them are bills from self- pporting funds; e.g., instructor fee indicating that those services are supported directly and totally by u r fees and are not a drain on the g neral trusery. The vote was unanim us in favor of paying the bills. i There was no correspondence. j Ordinance No. 15-86 - Rezone 3_66 Acres on Dublin-Granville Road, West of I Sawmill Road. Third Reading. ii The vote was unanimous in favor of the ordinance. Ordinance No. 7$-86 - Accept Quotation for De ign of Tuller Road Improve- " ments. Second Re ding. 6 ~c ' Mr. Amorose asked Mr Warner if the specifications ~iad been drawn up for ' Tuller Road. Mr. Warner said that the will not be done until the pens are approved. Mr. Warner also said Chat h would work with shomever is~a~+arded the contract and review the numbe of lanes, etc. There will be a third and final ading on Monday, November 17,'1`986 at 7:30 P.M. Ordi nce No. 80-86 - Creation of New Job Lassification - Maintenan\ Departm t. Second Reading. Mr. Rozanski equested that Council allow the Vi ge Manager to advertise Eor the positio while waiting for the third readin ' Ms. Maurer moved to away with the three time reading le and treat as an emergency in order t ive the Maintenance Department t opportunity to hire this person prior the time in which he will probab be needed most. Mr. Thornton seconded the motion. The vote on doing away with the thre time reading rule and treating as ergency was as follows: Mr. Rozanski, es; Mr. Thornton, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; r. Jankowski, ycs; Mr. Amorose, no; ayor Close, yes. Mr. Amor a wondered whether or not a High Sc of Diploma or GED ~~-OZSZ equivalency ould not be required of a potentia employee. ReZOning/ Preliminary Development Plan Lexus/Griffith C I T Y O F D U B L I N Department of Planning & Development MINUTES OF MEF'TING DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION rr~ll OCTOBER 6, 1988 Mr. Jezerinac, the chaff an, called the meeting'to order at approximately 7:35 p.m. Commission members pr sent were Mr. rose, Mr. Berlin, Mr. Geese, s. Rausch, and Mr. Re ner. Mr. Grace rrived at 8:40 p.m. Ms. Clarke, Ms. Leitzell, Mr. Bo an, Mr. Willis d Mr. Banchefsky of the Ci Staff were in attend nce. Mr. Amorose moved t approve the minutes f the September , 1988, Dublin Planning an Zoning Commission me ting. Mr. Rein seconded the motion, and the v to was as follows: M Berlin, yes; Geese, yes; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. ezerinac, yes; Amorose, yes. t~:r. Jezerinac nnounced that the fir t item on the a nda, Concept Plan - Daycare on offman Road, had been ithdrawn. 2. Final Development Plan and Corridor Development District CDD88-009 - Lexus Automobile Dealership Ms. Leitzell presented slides of the site and surrounding area. The site is located on the southeast corner of St. Rt. 161 and Hobbs Drive. Immediately to the west is the Golden Bear Appliance Store; to the east is a vacant, single-family house and then Dr. Donn Griffith's Veterinary Hospital; to the north across St. Rt. 161 is undeveloped shopping center acreage and then State Savings Bank; and to the south is the not-yet-completed Stoneridge Lane and then single-family residences which front on Martin Road. Ms. Clarke outlined the proposal as follows: -The site contains 3.65 acres on the corner of St. Rt. 161 and Hobbs Drive. She noted that Hobbs Drive is shown as Germain Drive on the plans, and stated that the street name probably will be changed. -The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, specifically for an automobile dealership. Last year there was a Final Development Plan for David Hobbs BMW Dealership approved for this site, but Mr. Hobbs then found a new site nearby. This application is for a line of luxury Toyota cars named Lexus. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan 5131 Posl (Id Suitc N 105 Dublin, Ohio 43017 ~ ! ' )_,eXUS~~Trifflt~l Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 -The applicant proposes to construct a building of 13,400 square feet; most of which is on the first floor with a recessed second floor as well. This plan includes a drive-thru service area as part of the high-profile service package which is part of the Lexus plan. The materials shown on the elevations submitted to the Commission are ribbed and smooth dryvit along with large expanses of storefront glass. Ms. Clarke noted that the applicant has informed her that these materials have been changed. Specific colors have not been submitted. -There are three curb cuts to the site. One right turn in/right turn out curb cut on the east property line on St. Rt. 161 will be shared with Dr. Griffith's property at the time of redevelopment. The other IW.r two curb cuts are along Hobbs/Germain Drive. -The plan provides for 156 parking spaces which exceeds the Code required number of 107 spaces. This does not include the display area at the intersection or the parking area which is available within the building itself. -The landscape plan includes three "picture frame" display areas for automobiles. The interior landscaping plan is deficient by 364 square feet and 4 trees. -The site plan and amenities are basically the same as the Hobb's plan which was approved. -The signage package has not been clearly outlined. Lexus dealerships will have a standardized building and a standardized signage package. One pole sign of 15 feet--which is in compliance with Code--is to be located at the corner of the site along with the logo etched on two corners of the canopy. The two logos are considered non-complying wall signs under Dublin's Code. A logo cannot consist of more than 20 percent of the sign face; in this case, the logo is the entire face. Also, only one wall sign is permitted on an elevation, and this would constitute two. Staff is recommending approval subject to the following modifications: 1) Landscaping to be brought into compliance with Code and/or previously approved plan including adjustments on west side of building, correct plant listing, and 3-foot screening outside "picture fraries"; 2) Satellite dish and any other rooftop elements to be completely screened; 3) Building colors and site lighting program to be demonstrated to the Commission ; 4) All signage to be demonstrated at the meeting or to be in strict compliance with Code provisions; and, 5) Dumpster location to be designated and appropriately screened. Mr. Willis stated that when writing the Staff Report he did not have storm water management calculations, but he now has a copy of the calculations done in December of 1986 for the Hobbs plan. The site plan shows that the developer is planning to do underground storm water detention for the runoff of this site, and Mr. Willis requested that the 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan t4inutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 , Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 3 applicant submit new calculations. Mr. Willis also stated that the engineering drawings lack details on the construction and location of the three driveways. Because of the lack of engineering information, Mr. Willis requested that the application be tabled or disapproved at this time. Mr. Reiner asked if the applicant was notified about the lack of engineering information. Mr. Willis replied that the applicant was not notified. Mr. Steve Germain, president of Germain Properties of Columbus, introduced himself and Mr. Mike Fitzpatrick, the architect for the site. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that they attempted to situate this building on the parcel identical to the approved Hobbs plan. The same engineering group, Burgess & Niple; and the same landscape architect, Jim Burkhart, were both used for this development. This building has a 13,400 square foot footprint which is smaller than the proposed Hobbs building of 26,000 square feet. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that when the engineers calculated the storm water runoff, they used 100 impervious surface. The curb cuts for this plan will follow the Hobbs plan. They have met with Dr. Griffith, the neighboring property owner, and the same cross access will be allowed with this plan. The applicant has agreed to add the 16 Colorado Spruce trees which were requested as a condition of approval on the Hobbs plan. These trees will be planted south of the existing tree house along the east side of the property. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the fence along the property line is run down and will be replaced with a new fence along the same line. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that there will only be three Lexus dealerships in Ohio, one in each of the major cities. All are to be built according to specific standards which are being established. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the dryvit material may be changed to pre-cast concrete. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the site is fully mounded with the exception of the "picture frame" display areas. Mr. Reiner asked if the height of the contours had been changed. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the undulations were not indicated on the Hobbs plan. Mr. Armorose asked about the three-foot mound along the south property line because it does not show on the plan. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the plan will be 1°~ adjusted to show a continuous three-foot mound. Mr. Reiner asked if the three-foot mounds were measured from the top of the curb. Mr. Burkhart, the landscape architect for the site, replied that the contour intervals are one foot each, and are measured from the top of the curb. Mr. Reiner asked if there were any changes in the mounding from the Hobbs plan. Mr. Burkhart replied that they did create picture frames, but the overall effect remains the same. The sign package consists of one 15-foot pole sign to be located. at the corner of the site and two wall signs to be sandblasted into the dryvit or pre-cast concrete material on two corners of the canopy. The sign face does not comply with Dublin's Code because the logo is approximately 80% of the sign face. Mr. Jezerinac stated that the use of the logo etched on the side of the building is the same as using a sign, which is against the Code. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that these logo signs will be eliminated. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan ~ Lexus/Griffith _ ~ MinutPS of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 4 Mr. Fitzpatrick presented the Commission with information on lighting from a page in the Lexus brochure. He stated that all fixtures will be the cut-off type, bronze aluminum, and the light will be metal halide. Mr. Jezerinac asked for further details on the site lighting package. He asked where the fixtures would be located and if the poles could be decreased to 15 feet in height. Mr. Germain stated that he was not aware of a height restriction. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the poles would be 20 feet high with approximately 60 foot-candles in the front line. Most of the lighting in the main body of the site will be around 15 foot-candles. Mr. Fitzpatrick compared this lighting with other dealerships in the area. He stated that Crestview Cadillac's front line varies from 35 to 75 foot-candles. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the light will be directed totally toward the site's interior with cut-off lenslighting. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that there will be four poles on the front line including the plaza area on St. Rt. 161. The dumpster will be located against the back line and will be screened with continuous 3-foot mounds. The dumpster will be on a concrete base and enclosed with a cedar fence with a gate. In regards to the satellite dish, Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the location has not been decided. It will either be located on the roof behind the two-story portion of the building and will be hidden on the other three sides by a screen, or it will be located on the ground surrounded by screening. Ms. Clarke asked about the size of the dish antenna. Mr. Fitzpatrick replied that it will be 1.5 meters. It is 8'8" from the ground to the top of the dish and S'9" in diameter. Mr. Reiner asked why the landscaping does not meet Code requirements. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that they will add two islands with one tree in each and two other trees will also be added to bring the plan into compliance with Code. Mr. Reiner requested a change in the front plantings to Compact Junipers. The applicant replied that this would not be a problem. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that they have made a commitment for a 56-foot dedication of right-of-way from centerline of St. Rt. 161 to the front property line. This will be deeded to the City of Dublin to allow for the widening of St. Rt. 161. Mr. Jezerinac asked the applicant to address the engineering issues in the Staff Report. Mr. Gus Bosworth of Burgess & Niple Ltd. stated that the engineering calculations had recently been submitted to Mr. Willis, but he did not have an opportunity to thoroughly review them prior to the meeting. Mr. Bosworth stated that the calculations were based on an undetained impervious area, whether it is roof or parking lot, in accordance with Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission storm water management criteria. The six-foot diameter pipe should provide adequate underground storage. The outlet is planned for the southwestern part of the site and will flow through a drainage channel that was constructed for the development of the Hobbs site. 47hen the street is extended to the west in the future, the intent is that the outlet pipe will go into the underground storm drainage system. Mr. Willis stated that he did not have a problem with the method of storm water management but will need to review the calculations. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 5 Mr. Willis stated that he would like to see working drawings showing the engineering on the entrance drives, especially the right-in/ right-out driveway on St. Rt. 161. Mr. Bosworth replied that he will provide working drawings for the driveways in strict accordance with the City of Dublin's requirements and will make any adjustments recommended by the City Engineer. Ms. Rausch asked for clarification on the curb cut on St. Rt. 161. Because it will be shared with Dr. Griffith's property, will the curb cut be done now and will it effect Dr. Griffith's property? Dr. Griffith stated that this curb cut will .allow ingress to his property if it is developed in the future. Ms. Clarke stated that the expansion of St. Rt. 161 will include a barrier median. Germain Drive, which lines up with Dublin Center Drive, will probably be a signalized intersection. The cross access from Germain Drive to Dr. Griffith's site will allow his clients to turn left in and out at that light. Dr. Griffith stated that he has met with the applicant and is satisfied with the plan. He would like to see a median cut on 161 in front of his property, but this will have to be worked out at a later time. The applicant stated that Germain is on record for granting the cross easement. Mr. Reiner asked about the proposed use of the plaza area. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that it would be used for display of two cars--the same as the Hobb's plan. Mr. Jezerinac asked about the color of the pre-cast concrete. Mr. Fitzpatrick replied that it would be a buff color, the same as in the rendering. Further informal discussion ensued about whether the building material would be dryvit or pre-cast concrete. Mr. Jezerinac expressed concern about the lack of details and changes relating to the appearance of the building. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the they have decided not to enclose the drive-in canopy area with glass. The canopy ' is still the same. Mr. Geese made a motion to approve the Final Development Plan and Corridor Development District review subject to: 1) Landscaping to be brought into compliance with Code and/or previously approved plan including adjustments on west side of building, correct plant listing, and 3-foot screening outside "picture frames" and addition of 16 Colorado Spruces along east property line; 2) Satellite dish and any other rooftop elements to be completely screened; 3) Building color to be "buff", and lighting to be as stipulated; 4) All signs to be in strict compliance with Code; 5) Dumpster to be screened with cedar fencing on all four sides; 6) Engineering issues to receive detailed plan approval by City Engineer. 00-0282 Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan p*~e _ . _ u , _ Minutes of Meeting, October 6, 1988 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Page 6 Ms. Clarke pointed out that the proposed signage is not in compliance with Code. The 7'x 7' sign is in compliance with Code as far as size, but the percentage covered by the logo exceeds Code. Mr. Jezerinac restated item #4 to read as follows: 4) One ground sign to be allowed with a logo greater than 20~, and the elimination of the two wall signs (logos etched in the canopy). 7) Sargent and Tams Junipers to be changed to Compact Pfitzer Junipers; 8) No more than two cars to be displayed in plaza area at any time; 9) Dedication of 56-foot right-of-way from centerline of St. Rt. 161. Mr. Berlin seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr. Jezerinac, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Geese, yes. The motion was passed 6-0. 3_ Corridor Developee t District CDD88-O10 Rit 'Rug/Sun TV Ms. Leitzell presente slides of the site: -The rectangular site is located on the north ide of Village Parkwa (formerly known as F erated Boulevard), at t e recently completed c ock tower. It has sligh ly over 400 feet of fron age on both Sawmill R ad and Dublin Center Drive. To the north are s veral automobile dealerships; to the west across Dublin Cente Drive are the Huntin ton National Bank site nd vacant property owne by Drexel Developmen Company; to the so th across Village Parkw are the Toys-R-Us/Gl ck's site currently un r construction, and the existing Kentucky Fri d Chicken restauran facing Sawmill Road. T the east across Sa 11 Road in Columbus is an enormous site for a reg onal shopping center ith only a small percenta e of the land developed hus far. +rr Ms. Clarke pres nted the Commission wit the following inform tion: -The site conta ns 6.53 acres and is zo ed CC, Community Co rcial along with all of the surrounding prop rty. The applicant i requesting review under t e Corridor Development istrict provisions. -The applican s are Sun TV and Rite R g, each of which inte ds to build a free-standi g building on the site_ The parcel is expec ed to be split from e st to west with a commo driveway through the center. Sun TV plans to ocate its building of ,848 square feet on he southern half of the site with parking in fr nt of and behind its uilding. Rite Rug is prop sing to develop the no thern half of the sit and is looking at the pos ibility of two building one on the Sawmill oad frontage which will contain about 13,000 s uare feet for a Rite ug store and several o er retail shops to be ncluded under one ro f, and a second building o be constructed at a ater date which will e oriented toward Dublin C ter Drive. Both buil 'ngs (Rite Rug and Su TV) will be set back fro Sawmill Road 175 feet or more and will be ~n line with one another. -Parkin has been set up indep ndently and calculat as such with this application. 00-0282 Rezoning/ ~ Preliminary Development Plan T -----_ir_.cr.~~.