Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-00 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Leal Blank Co. Form No Anna 19-00 Ordinance No Passed An ordinance providing for a change in zoning for 40.79 acres located on the east and west sides of Liggett Road, approximately 1,250 feet south of .wA~, Post Road, From: R, Rural District To: PCD, Planned Commere District (Perimeter/Liggett -Case File No. 00-004Z). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, 2 of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the Ciry of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21- 70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passe Y day of 2000. ayor -Presiding Officer Attest: t~'~ Clerk of Council Sponsor: Planning Division I hereby certify that cop'ees ai this Ordinance/Resolufilon were pasted in the City of D~rl7tin i, nccor~lente with Section 73).25 bf the t1h;o gevlsed Coda, ~ C! of Ce~lncil, Dublin hio RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Lee~l Blank Co - Form No. 3003 19-00 Ordinance No....._ Passed An ordinance providing for a change in zoning for 40.79 acres located on the east and west sides of Liggett Road, approximately 1,250 feet south of Post Road, From: R, Rural District To: PCD, Planned Commere District (Perimeter/Liggett -Case File No. 00-004Z). ,.Mw. °ta^ NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, _ of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A") situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21- 70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of , 2000. Mayor -Presiding Officer Attest: Clerk of Council ..,ter Sponsor: Planning Division /•3 D app MEETUHO ON / / ~ ~ ~ . EXHIBI_"f ~ w ~ a ~ CT. HOLY ,dca ~ . ~A , ~ V~' R~ p~ ~~YAL PLUI[E ~ ~ G .6`,~ ~ HOP ~ . ~ ~ 4y M 4 ~ ~G~~ ~ ~Gi1~, 33 j ~ ~ ~Op0 x 9 ~ ~ P8 ~O ~ ~1?~ i ~ pARIC DR .~(OK ~ ~ =p - ~ `t~,, ~ p 1 ~ px. OISIN ROUND ~ ~1y,, _ ~ ~ GRANGE DR ~ 4 OTTAWA i DR~fO~, Y ARAr PL i i $TR DR FA - - - ~ FAR~Y.S~PWKWY - i POST RD PERI1lET~ LAKES LOOP ~ SITE PIER DR PERIMETER DR _ ~ ~'4 LOOP 1 W IN PARK ~ a. ~ d,~ 1 ~ 1 1 --~--J ; ~ 1 0 SI.uER RINGS RD PLC t'd.. 1 ~ SHIER LN 1 ~ ~I,u( PL HOLIDAY LN 1 G ~,AG 1 1 ~ T 1 _ J DAN-SHERRI C AVE OVA'TI( ' ~ ~ KENDALL ~ DY ~N~ i 1 9~0~ ~ BLVD. ~ p i 1 CORLEY DR s 0 1000 2000 1 R stzN u w.cuP1R RD SCALE IN FEET 1 IN EQUALS 1200 FT 00-0042 ~ Rezoning Application ~ Perimeter/Liggett _ ~ ~r ~ R~ PLR GG 33 R-1 P D R PUD 1 P~RD _ RI ~ PCD ITE D 1aE Boa P I R b q p ~ PCD A 0 a w GI SHIER RINGS D o ~ r-- r R oo-oo4z Rezoning Application Perimeter/Liggett EXHIBIT . REVISED E?CH~EIT "e" REZONING APPLICATION (Code Section 153.234) EXPIRE CI'I`Y OF D[J13LIv Ordinance No. 1 q~ O~ ~ 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 / Cit Council 1st Readin ii PhoneJTDD: 614/761-6550 y g ~ I r" Fax: 614/761-6566 City Council Public Hearing City Council Action FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ? Amo nt Received: Application No: P&Z Date(s): P&Z Action: Receipt No: ) MIS Fe No: Date Receiv Receiv By. Type of Request / o ? PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS - PLG.~SG PRI\T - ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION and CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION Composite Plan(Code Section 153.058) ? Preliminary Development Plan (Code Section 153.056) ? Other (Describe) I. PROPERTY INFORN1ATlON TAX ID NO/ 273-001902-00 Pagel size: 40.793 + acres DISTRICT PARCEL NO: (Acres) - wwW Property Address: 1) 6594 Liggett Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Casto Affinity Parcel - 40.108 Acres) 2) 6565 Li ett Road Ci of Dublin Parcel - .685 Acres Property Location: East of Liggett Road & North of US 33/161 Side of Street (N, S. E, W) Nearest Intersection: Liggett & Post Road currently; adjacent to proposed extension of Perimeter Dr. r- - - - _ _ _ _ _ . Distance from Nearest Intersection: 1/8 N, S, E, W from Nearest Intersectio Existing Land UsPJDevelopment: Farm House/Agricultural Use M D U Profun~xl L;u~d UsvDrvrl,~hmrnt. Office/Institutional & Ancillary Uses ~,t'tN - - ,t,,~~.1 Rozonincl Al~plir,.ilion (~'~IV, 1~PCp~~B X11 P:u~r I „r s V ~1 ~J r L I I y dubdevapp EXHIBIT "B" Current or Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: No. of Acres to be Rezoned: R-Rural PCD 40.793 ± acres STATEMENT: State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity. The proposed development will include office, institutional, and ancillary use activities within the area to be rezoned. The proposed PCD corresponds to the direction outlined in the Dublin Community Plan, which calls for mixed use with an employment emphasis within this area. The planned extension of Perimeter Drive from its current point of termination through the Perimeter West Development and through the subject property allows easy access to both the Avery/33 interchange and the Post Road/33 interchange, making this an attractive site for development. The Perimeter Road frontage, easy highway access, and existing office/commercial uses bordering the site clearly indicate that the PCD proposed for this site is acceptable. STATEMENT: State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan. The proposed PCD is directly in line with the land use development outlined in the Dublin Community Plan, as the plan shows mixed use with employment emphasis and the US 33/ SR161 Edge Area Plan is consistent with the office; institution, and ancillary uses detailed in this application. The Area Plan calls for a development of mixed uses including the office and institutional components to serve the sites. The plan is to develop ahigh-quality development with features and amenities to attract corporate entities to Dublin and provide an ongoing tax stream to the City. PREVIOUS APPLICATION? Has an application for rezoning the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES ? NO IF YES, WHEN? State the basis of reconsideration: IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COMPOSITE OR PRELIMINARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES gl NO ? IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES ® NO ? II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ? r L1 / ~ ~T , Legal description of the property to be rezoned consists of ~ page(s). ~ ~ ~ ~ y - A PLAN REQUIREMENTS: ? 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24' X 36') SHOWING: a. Th© silo and all land 500 feat boyond the boundaries b. North arrow and bar scalo c. Existing conditions (Roads, buildings, vegolation,lopography, jurisdictional boundaries, utilities, olc.) d. Proposed Uses (R~~cdional transportation system, densities, q of dwellings, building unit types, square footages, parkland/open space, etc.) o. Existing and proposed zoning district boundaries R~:zoning Application PLA-108 Dato 09/28/99 1':~~c ? ~,f S dubdevapp ~~C~II~i ~ f. Size of the site in acres/square feet; and g. All property lines, street rights-of-way. easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries. ~ 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11" X 17") ~ 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/Z" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20') Showing contiguous property owners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. III. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. PROPERTY OWNER (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE See attached list ~ J Rezoning Application PLA-108 Date 09/28/99 I':,rc i ,~I ti dubdevapp /1!>< EXHIBIT "B" PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name of Current Property Owner(s): 1) Casto Affinity, Limited - 40.108 Acres 2 Ci of Dublin - .685 Acres Mailing Address: (street, city, State, Zip Code) 209 E. State Street, Columbus OH 43215 Daytime Telephone: (614) 228-5331 Fa"' (614) 469-8376 Name of Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): Timothy Kelton 'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. Ruscilli Real Estate Services, Inc. Mailing Address: 2041 Arlingate Lane, Columbus Ohio 43228 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: (614) 876-9441-2626 Fax: (614) 771-7189 Which of the above is the primary contact person? Timothy Kelton V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and northwest Franklin County has stretched the Cit~/s capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date. The ApplicanUOwner hereby acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Applicant. VII. OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE See attached I ,the owner and applicant, hereby authorize to act as my representative and agent in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application including modifying the project, and I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent. Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT Rezoning Application PLA-108 Dalo 09/28/99 I';U'C ~l S " dubdevapp EXHIBIT "B" STATE OF nhi n COUNTY OF Franklin I, Timothy Kelton ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached e~ibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct, to the best of m nowledge and belief. Signature of Applicant or Date Authorized Representati ~ ~ _ oa Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1~ day o ,~~3~ Notary Public ~ PEAL _'o'~~ ~ ¢~,RENS ~iLgERT t;OTn~Y PU~_,:,. s~~,iE Of OHIO - MV CON;h11SSlOi7 EX?I:,LS AUGUST 8, 2001 ,.,s, pnn mmi~~~~~ Rezoning Application Pago 5 of S PLA-108 09/28,'99 SUBJECT TRACT CASTO AFFINITY, LTD. - 40.108 ACRES The following REAL ESTATE situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, and being in Virginia Military Survey # 3457, and being part of Sophia E. Eitetman's (now Liggett) tract described in Deed Volume 770, Page 97, said tract being more pazticulazly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Liggett Road at the northwest comer of said Eitetman tract, said point being in the west line of Virginia Military Survey #3452 and the east line of Virginia Military Survey # 6748, and also being the southwest corner of Remark's acre tract (Deed Volume 3096 Page 99); Thence North 83 degree 12' 34" East 1125.23 feet, along the south line of said 6.232 acre tract to a point at the northeast corner of said Eiterman tract and being the southeast comer of the Vicaz Company 1-.398 acre tract (Official Record 6707 I-17), and being in the west line of the D.L. Lane and R.M. Lane 83.149 acre tract (Official Record 6787 A- 04); Thence South 4 degrees 48' 25" East 2087.51 feet, along the west line of said 83.149 acre tract, to a point in the northerly right-of--way of a curve in U.S. Route 33, (U.S. 33 - Sec. 0.00); Thence along with north right-of--way line of said U.S. Route 33 the following courses; Thence North 55 degrees 13' 37" West 72.05 feet to a point; Thence along the arc of a curve, radius of 3759.53 feet a chord bearing of North 49 degrees 57' 19" West 1259.31 feet to a point; Thence North 36 degrees 03' S3" West 211.42 feet to a point; Thence North 49 degrees 45' 46" West 74.81 feet to a point; Thence North 35 degrees 43' 39" West 46.65 feet to a point in the centerline of Liggett Road marking the southeast comer of a 0.721 acre tract presently owned by the City of Dublin (O.R. 6769 B07); Thence North 4 degrees 06' 22" West 840.86 feet, along said centerline of Liggett Road and the east line of Virginia Military Survey # 3452, to the place of beginning, containing 40.108 acres, more or less, subject to all valid easements and restrictions of record. s:~doc~subject tract.doc NOTE: Legal Description for City of Dublin owned Parc~l~6 to be provided t>~y City of Dublin - - r, 'l Rn ~'~ii t~` . cra.~ewws - t.uose~re .wa+recrs - su'rerons r ~ ~ V v _ Wa .w.r., rt fM sa,7 IOIJ C' iv - c...~a.~ ow .a~.a na .w .aa uu -w Sent by: CITY OF DUBLIN FINANCE DEPT. 6147616562; 01/13/00 5:05PM;p327; Page 4/5 it 6 7 6 9 s o 9 ~ f~ C. f. BIRD b R. BULL, L7D. C01~LSULi1NG ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS May 4 , 1981 ~I , eau uNwoRN ROAD 1111YJ'(~~'~".~~~~ p~~ WOITNINGION, OHIO ~]OIQ l I / Q / ~ ~ _ ~ f{ 1!f . ?NOME !l~•113-026 ~J LJ ~/,1) DESCRIPTION OF 0.685 ACRE TRACT • AT SOUTH END OF LIGGETT ROAD W1~.SHINGTON TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO FOR MR. CARY W. LYONS b MR. JOHN S.DELIBERA Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, Township of Washington, in Virginia Military Survey No. 6748, and being all of t11e 0.721 acre tract of land (0.685 acre by recent survey) conveyed to Gary w. Lyons and John S. Del.ibera by deed of record in Deed Book 3031, Pac3e Recorder's Office, Franklin CounL•y, Ohio, and bounded and descr5bed as Follows : rr~' beginning at an iron pin set at the intersection of t:he centerline Liggett Road (no legal right-of-way width established - 40 feet wide by usage) with the curved northeast limited access right-of-way line of U. Route 33 and Ohic] Route 161, said iron pin being at the southernnost corn of said 0.685 acre tract and said iron pin also being 103.00 feet left c centerline station 1353 t 27.10, as shown upon Sheet 28 of 29 of Ohio Department of Transportation right-of-way plans for UNI-33-20.23 and FRA-33-0.00; thence northwesterly along tYle curved northeast limited access right-of-way line of U. S. Route 33 and Ohio Route 161, along the curvet southwest line of said 0.685 acre tract and with a curve to the right, c of which is radius = 3,083.53 feet, sub-delta = 5° 27' 46" and sub-arc 362.64, feet a sub-chord distance of 362.51 feet bearing N 32° 38' 43" w an iron pin found at the northwest. corner of said 0.685 acre trace: and the southwest corner of a 2.009 acre tract of land conveyed to Joitri A. Joan A. Larson by deed of record in Deed Book 3716, Page 3, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said iron pin being 103.00 feet le°t of centerline station 1349 + 54.63 of U. S. Route 33 and Ohio Route 161; thence N 21° 12' 27" E along the north line of said 0.685 ac1-e tree and along the south line of said 2.009 acre tract a distance of 173.77 f to a P. K. Nail'set in the centerline of Liggett Road, at the nnrr.he~st corner of said 0.685 acre tract and at the southeast corner of said 2.O1 acre tract (passing an iron pin found at 157.99 feet); thence S 4° 06' 22' E along the centerline of Liggett Road anti aloe the east line of said 0.685 acre tract a distance of 332.66 feet t:o the place of beginning; containing 0.685 acre of land more or less and being subject to al: legal highways, easements and restrictions,; of record, _ _ • The above description was prepared by Richard J. Bull, Ohio Surveyor ~o. 4723, of C. F. Ili rd t R. J. Bull, Ltd. Consulting Engineers b Sltrveyo Worthington, Ohio, from an actual boundary survey performed in the field April, 1981. cJ -/uy-C /~~~c.%F OO~ ~ Richard J. Bul / r~Q 7 0 Ohio Surveyor 4723 ~~/>/~s PERIMETER - LIGGETT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ v CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS 1 BJL LP 5 Post 33 Co. P.O. Box 671 3220 Riverside Drive #C 1 London, Ohio 43140 Columbus, Ohio 43221 2 GLK Properties, Ltd. 6 Dennis J. Hoffer 7155 Post Road 8262 Glencree Place Dublin, Ohio 43016 Dublin, Ohio 43016 3 Post Hylands Co. 7 Village of Dublin (nka City of Dublin) 3220 Riverside Drive, #C 1 5200 Emerald Parkway Columbus, Ohio 43221 Dublin, Ohio 43017 4 S A Lamyers, Ltd. 818 E. Franklin Street, #A Centerville, Ohio 45459 FILE COPY ~ ~5 i'~ ~ ~ ~ L E : G~~ aF QJ~!_!N . _ ~ 1 ~ ~ P seu n _ .i ~ ~ ~.,E~. .+x, x~ ~ .i , * ~ ~ ~ _ . 7yyZZ7(((.. ~ J - - ~~J~ ' t yM U c~_ y rt ~ " r, i ~ 3 s ~ r i[1-4'1 Db ` Q e~~~t ~ t t {+~Yt ~ ~it~~ .f / " i 'r Lrrr S. y _ d C ~U t yy E `LL r` r' V d - v, ~ m i C U V 3 y V d Z V •n y o tee'` ~ - Vj w. O -w OL c H ~'f . ¢ a~ ` a ~ o ~ ~aL~a W ~ ~ ~ O N Eg'o`-'Q w aQO~a ~ a amvow d ~a~w•..... ..'N.n ~ . ~ w GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PERIMETER / LIGGETT JANUARY 3, 2000 Description: As further described in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject land is bounded by SR 161 and US 33 on ~ the west and south, Perimeter West office development on the east and the proposed extension of Perimeter Drive on the north. General Development Standards 1. It is the intent for this development to be a unified, Class A office and institutional use park. 2. A mix of mid-rise, signature type office and institutional buildings and low-rise professional medical and office buildings will be promoted. 3. Detailed architectural standards will be set forth in deed restrictions providing for coordinated use of materials and architectural character throughout the development. 4. Signage shape, size, color, and style will be controlled by signage standards set forth for the entire development. In no event shall ground signs exceed a maximum height of 6 feet. All site planning will be done in a manner consistent with prudent planning principles and practice. 5. If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the r,. Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply in all such matters not covered. 6. Emphasis shall be placed on high quality landscaping and where practical, water features. Pedestrian access and seating areas shall be incorporated in proximity to ponds and water features. 7. Landscaping for each individual building site shall be consistent with other "Class A" campus developments in Dublin. 8. Road Improvements to be made prior to development shall include the exten~fa~~f COPY Perimeter Drive through the site to its terminus at Post Road. Said improvements are to be completed by the City of Dublin pursuant to (TIF) Ordinance No. t--:; ~.~99 ~p~sed by;City, Council on December 13, 1999) on or before December 31, 2000. ~ ; r; ~ ~ ~ L' ~ ; 3i ! ~ i - ; 11 ~ ``f~'J Vim/ ~ i1 tom: 9. The maximum lot coverage permitted shall be not greater than 60% in the aggregate with no individual site having a lot coverage ratio greater than 65%. 10. The maximum building area to be constructed shall be not greater than 9,000 squaze feet per gross acre. Individual sites however may exceed this requirement provided however the overall density shall not exceed an average of 9,000 square feet in the aggregate. 11. When requested by Dublin City Staff, the developer shall prepaze and maintain a log illustrating density and lot coverage for the Perimeter / Liggett Road development. 12. Improvements constructed in conjunction with the development of Perimeter / Liggett Road shall be in compliance with the Dublin Thoroughfaze Plan and Dublin Stormwater Regulations. 13. Landscape treatments, including street trees along all roads, shall be consistent with the Perimeter West development which is immediately east of subject. Specific Development Standards 1.01 Permitted Uses: The uses permitted include: ¦ Those permitted uses listed in the Dublin Zoning Regulations in Section 153.026(A). ¦ General office uses including, without limitation, corporate headquarters and offices of major institutional users. ¦ Ancillary commercial services or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or institutional uses. Permitted Height and Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks shall be determined as described below: ¦ Side and reaz yazds for buildings shall be a minimum of 30 feet. ¦ Side and rear yazds for parking areas shall be 10 feet on each side of the property line for a total of 20 feet between areas unless a common parking lot is established. ¦ The maximum height of all buildings shall be 5 stories above grade plus mechanicals and architectural features. Architectural features shall be limited to mechanical screens and skylights. ¦ Buildings shall be limited to 80 feet in height including mechanicals an h~ec treatments. ~ ~ ~ 1 2. Pavement setbacks shall be the following: , l ~ j ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 , . I i5 i l ¦ 50 feet from SR 161/33 ~ , ¦ 30 feet from Perimeter Drive ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ¦ 30 feet from Liggett Road t_~,_ f 9 I 3. Building setbacks shall be the following: ¦ 100 feet from SR 161/33. ¦ For buildings under 60 feet in height (including mechanicals) the minimum setback line shall be 50 feet from Perimeter Drive. ¦ Buildings in excess of 60 feet in height (including mechanicals) shall be setback a minimum of 150 feet from Perimeter Drive. 1.03 Traffic, Circulation, Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio, and loading facilities shall be regulated by City of Dublin Zoning Code Sections 153.200 through 153.212. Parking in excess of that required by the Code may be S' x 16' with 22-foot aisles. 2. Exceptions from strict application of code parking standards may be granted at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. Loading areas shall be screened according to City of Dublin Code Section 153.134. 4. Ingress and egress to and from the site shall be provided along the proposed extension of Perimeter Drive and Liggett Road. 5. Curb cuts for the Perimeter Drive right-of--way shall be approved in accordance with the City Engineer's direction. 6. Shared drives will be encouraged throughout the development to reduce the number of curb cuts needed. Shared drives may be required for any lot of 250 feet of lot width or less. 1.04 Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened, according to the Dublin zoning code, with walls constructed of materials that coordinate with the materials utilized in the associated structure (i.e. brick, etc). 1.05 Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure, except during construction. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be set back from the property line or building edge so ~ vrs~i~~ t ~ adjacent property, or shall be screened from public view 1 ds~ ern en materials harmonious with the building. ~ E i r 1.06 Landscaping, Lot Coverage, and Pedestrian Paths: 1. All landscaping shall, at a minimum, be according to the City of Dublin Zoning Code Section 153.134. Landscaping for each individual building site shall be consistent with other "Class A" office campus developments in Dublin. 2. The developer agrees to limit areas of construction activity and implement sedimentation and erosion control measures to minimize erosion during construction. 1.07 Fences/Walls 1. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. 1.08 Signage and Graphics: Except as otherwise herein stated: 1. All signage and graphics shall conform to the City of Dublin Zoning Code Sections 153.150 through 153.164. 2. All Signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks of Sections 153.150 through 153.164, Signs. 3. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 4. No roof signs shall be permitted, nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 5. No flashing, traveling, animated, or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 6. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed, other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. ar 7. Two (2) office complex identification monument signs shall be permitted at the following locations: one along Perimeter Drive and one along State Route 161/33 each shall have a maximum copy of 80 square feet and a maximum height of six (6) feet above the adjacent grade. These monument signs shall be constructed of high quality materials and shall be uniform in appearance, and actual placement shall be subject to approval by Planning and Zoning Commission. 8. Temporary development marketing signage shall be permitted. .,'.V ~p ~1it.~ 9. No wall signage shall be permitted unless specifically app ,~zcd-lie- P~an~ng, - Commission. ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~_J.-_- ~Q2 Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated, all lighting must conform to the City of Dublin Lighting Guidelines. 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut-off type fixtures. 2. All types of pazking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cut-off fixtures, and shall be of the same type and style. 3. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be a dazk brown, black or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. 5. Cut-off type lighting and building alighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. 7. All building illumination shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of the buildings. 9. All lighting of pazking/driving areas and buildings will be designed and constructed so that it will be directed away from adjacent residential properties. 10. Alighting plan conforming to the City's Lighting Guidelines must be submitted to the City as part of the Development Plan. 1.10 Architectural Standards: The following standazds shall apply and be placed as deed restrictions, also: 1. All buildings and associated structures shall be hazmonious in character, and reflect an upscale, high quality, signature, office park development. Final architectural drawings shall be presented for approval according to the process identified by the Development Plan. 2. All buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. Stone, brick, or decorative precast concrete panels shall be dominant exterior materials. Dryvit and other accent materials shall be limited to a maximum of 15% of the total exterior areas of the building, exclusive of windows. ~ ~ • 3. Facade colors and materials on individual buildings shall be coordinated to t complement each other. Facade colors of high chroma or int -are-not-per-Witted.-..-.._ ~ i~ a ~C'! s w~ ~ i ~ j~l§:, a~E a~~,i F , i s 3 4 4. Glass and curtain wall color should be coordinated to complement each other and the color palette of the building. Highly reflective "mirror-like" glass shall not be permitted on building facades. 5. No metal panels shall be permitted on building facades except architectural metal panels used to screen rooftop mechanical units. 3c:\files\liggett\dev_stds.d21 ~O~ 1 rv, ~ li,, LS u ~l L r ~ ~ 7 i~ ' y ~i i~ ,'a /ilV i i 6 ~~~E~~~ _ i DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - RECORD OF ACTION February 17, 2000 CITI" OF D[iIiLI\ Oivisioa of Maamng 5800 Shims-Rings Raad ubGn, Oha X3016-1236 w a~ne/IDD: 614-161-6550 fmc:6l4-761-6566 Web Site: www.dubl'm.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 5. Rezoning Application 00-0042 - Perimeter/Liggett Location: 40.79 acres located on the east and west sides of Liggett Road, approximately 1,250 feet south of Post Road. Existing Loning: R, Rural District. Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Proposed Use: A commercial development including office and institutional uses totaling 359,000 square feet. Applicant: Casto Affinity Ltd., 209 East State Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215; and Ruscilli Real Estate, c/o Tim Kelton, 4041 Arlington Lane, Columbus, Ohio 4322.0. MOTION: To approve this rezoning because the use and design are consistent with the Future Land Use and the "US 33/SR 161 Edge" Area Plan of the Community Plan; it meets the PCD requirements of Section 153.058; it is consistent with the PCD requirements in the adjacent development; and with the implementation of recommended road network improvements, traffic movements operate at acceptable levels of service; with 11 conditions: 1) That the text be revised to indicate full compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan (including right-of--way dedication), and the Stormwater Regulations; 2) That the six near-term traffic improvements as listed in the Assistant City Engineer's memo, dated February 7, 2000, be completed before issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit, subject to staff approval; 3) That site plan design reflect the gateway nature of this site, subject to staff approval; 4) That the landscape treatment along all roads, including street trees, be consistent with the property to the east; Page 1 of 2 SUgMt1TE~ ~ GOUNgt ~ fOR MEETING ON e DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION February 17, 2000 5. Rezoning Application 00-0042 -Perimeter/Liggett (Continued) j... 5) That a master tree preservation plan for the PCD site be submitted concurrent with the first development plan, indicating species type, size, location, and ~ removal/preservation status; 6) That the South Fork of the Indian Run corridor be preserved and augmented by reforestation (within 50 feet on each side of the stream) and the installation of a pedestrian path system, subject to staff approval; 7) That the text be revised to limit the development to one identification sign, unless the 41 acres is developed as a single user campus, in which case two development signs would be permitted; 8) That a vacation plat be secured by the applicant for any unused portion of Liggett Road; 9) That Liggett Road be utilized as a service road only until it is improved to meet current Ciry standards, with access points approved by the City Engineer; 10) That all conditions be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council; and 11) That all billboards be removed from the site 30 days after Council approval. * Tim Kelton agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5-0. RESULT: This rezoning .application was approved. It will be forwarded to Ciry Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIFICATION .di Chad Gibson Planner Page 2 of 2 e ._.-w. ' Tjublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -February 17, 2000 Page t4 CASE 5: Rezoning Application 00-0042 -Composite Plan -Perimeter Liggett - 6594 Liggett Road Location: 40.79 acres located on both sides of Liggett Road, approximately 1,250 feet south of Post Road. Existing Zoning: R, Rural District. Request: PCD, Planned Commerce District. Proposed Use: Office and institutional development of up to 370,000 square feet. Applicant: Casto Affinity Ltd, 209 E -State Street, Columbus Ohio, 43215; and Ruscilli Real Estate, c/o Timothy Kelton, 2041 Arlington Lane, Columbus, Ohio 43220; and and the City of Dublin, c/o Timothy Hansley, City Manager, 5200 Emerald Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017. Staff Contact: Chad Gibson, Planner.* BACKGROUND: The subject site has been annexed since 1981, but this is the first rezoning request. The request is for review of a Planned Commerce District composite plan under Section 153.058. Following a recommendation by the Planning Commission, a public hearing and vote will be scheduled at City Council.. Atwo-thirds vote is required to overturn a negative recommendation. from the . !Commission (a majority vote is required otherwise):.If approved, the rezoning becomes effective 30 days~after passage. A development plan must also be approved by the Commission prior to construction. The site will also be subject to preliminary and final platting. CONSIDERATIONS:.. - _ . Site Characteristics:, • The 40.79-acre site is zoned R, Rural District, is located directly adjacent to US 33/SR 161, .south of Post Road. .The vast majority of the, site is east of Liggett Road. The site is relatively flat and has been farmed for a number of years. There is a vacant house located along the east side of Liggett Road. Mature tree rows are located mainly along the property lines. The site includes a residual 0.685-acre parcel located on the west side of Liggett Road at its termination with US 33/SR 161. The City of Dublin owns this parcel. The applicant has agreed to purchase this site and include it within the proposed development. Any portion of Liggett Road will require a vacation plat prior to being taken out of service. The Franklin/Union County line passes to the north of the site from east to west. • To the east is the recently zoned Perimeter West PCD (81 acres). To the west, across Liggett Road is a vacant industrial building (Hoffer), and undeveloped land. Both parcels are zoned R, Rural District. To the south, across US 33/SR 161 is the Sutphen Corporation, zoned LI, Limited Industrial District (Washington Township). To the north are the vacant Remarks storage facility, two parcels zoned R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District, and one zoned SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. Community Plan Issues: • The preferred land use from the Community Plan included primarily office and institutional uses at a maximum density of 9,000 square feet per acre. The proposed land uses correlate with the Plan. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission L Staff Report -February 17, 2000 Page 15 • The Community Plan shows this area as mixed use-employment emphasis, and it is included in the "US 33/SR 161 Edge Area Plan". One goal of the Area Plan is to obtain a high quality office development along the US 33/SR 161 corridor. Large landscaped setbacks should also be provided along primary corridors, particularly Post Road. Consistent streetscapes should be developed to define the internal roadway system. Quality architecture and building materials should be included. • Another recommendation of the US 33/SR 161 Area Plan is to preserve and enhance natural features. The South Fork of the Indian Run cuts through the northwest corner of the site, and this amenity should be enhanced by reforestation and a trail that will eventually connect Coffman Park and Darree Fields. A park-like setting should be developed adjacent to this stream corridor. Buildings should be grouped in courtyards, along open spaces, with a close relationship to • the street edge. Open spaces associated with the development should be coordinated and connect to the stream corridor, including the construction of a pedestrian trail system. Land Use/Layout: The proposed PCD text permits all permitted uses within the SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. The text indicates that the site will develop as a unified, "Class A" office and institutional park. Mid-rise, signature office and institutional buildings, as well as low-rise medical and general office buildings are permitted. Ancillary services such as daycare or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or institutional uses are also permitted. • The site plan submitted includes no information with regard to site layout. The location of buildings, wet ponds, parking, landscaping, etc. has not been addressed. Development Standards: Buildings are limited to 80 feet in height including all mechanicals and architectural treatments. The lot coverage for the overall 40.79-acre development will not exceed 60 percent. However, individual sites can have up to 65 percent lot coverage. The maximum building area is 9,000 square feet per gross acre. At buildout, the entire site could contain up to 370,000 of (mostly) offices, based again on gross acreage. • The text establishes the following minimum setback requirements: from Perimeter Drive, 50 feet for buildings under 60 feet in height (including mechanicals) and 150 feet for buildings 60 feet or greater in height, and 30 feet for pavement; from US 33/SR 161, 100 feet for buildings and 50 feet for pavement; from Liggett Road, 50 feet for buildings and 30 feet for pavement. These standards repeat Perimeter West PCD text. Minimum side and rear yard setbacks are 30 feet for buildings and 10 feet for pavement, unless a common parking lot is established with cross access easements. • Parking within the proposed PCD will comply with Code. Surplus parking, or spaces beyond the number required by Code, may be striped as "compact" spaces (8 feet by 16 feet with 22- foot aisles). Access/Traffic Management: • The site plan submitted demonstrates a single, primary access point into the site from Perimeter Drive. Development of this site requires Perimeter Drive (100-foot right-of--way) _ . ~.W. ' Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -February 17, 2000 Page 16 to be extended through the northeast corner of the site. Right-of--way dedication for the Perimeter Drive extension is required. Perimeter Drive will intersect with Post Road near its US 33 interchange and will be constructed with the Perimeter West development. The text states that number of curbcuts and their locations must be approved by the City Engineer. The text must be amended to state that this site will fully comply with the Thoroughfaze Plan. • A traffic study was conducted recently for the Perimeter West site, and the subject site is within the same Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). A supplemental study has been submitted to specifically address the subject site. The study started with the land uses tested in the "Preferred Scenario" of the Community Plan. This 40.79-acre site is included in a 275-acre TAZ bounded by Post Road, Avery-Muirfield Drive and US 33/SR 161. The land uses~tested for this TAZ aze office (918,000 squaze feet), retail (254,000 squaze feet), industrial (727,000 square feet) and 400 hotel rooms. The update to the traffic study is included in the Commission packet. • The study concludes that, with signalization, the intersection of Perimeter Drive and the site driveway will function at "B" levels of service, with no individual movements functioning at less than a "D+". At the intersection of Post Road with Perimeter Drive, "D" levels of service or better will occur with Post Road placed under stop sign control. At the intersection of Liggett Road with Perimeter Drive, acceptable levels will also result with signalization and the installation of right and left turn lanes. The installation of a connection. between Liggett Road and Perimeter Drive through the site was also recommended as well as the provision of a driveway to serve parcels north of the site. The modification of the US 33/SR 161 interchange will also be necessary to properly accommodate projected traffic volumes. • The study states that the current Post Road and US 33/SR 161 interchange will fail by year 2003. It will fail with or without the proposed development. The City has hired an engineering firm (CHZM Hill) to study this interchange, and the analysis will be complete by the fourth quarter of 2000. It may be necessary to relocate Liggett Road to the east in order to accommodate the interchange improvements, but this is yet undetermined. • Liggett Road should be utilized as a service road only (for loading and unloading) unless it is improved to current City street standards with access points to be approved by the City Engineer. • Perimeter Drive has an eight-foot bikepath along the north side and a sidewalk along the south side. The path and sidewalk will be continued through this development and must be shown on the preliminary plat. . A Tax Increment Financing (TIF) area was established for road improvements. This TIF was modified for the Perimeter West development. The TIF agreement includes the realignment of Post Road westward to the interchange, widening Avery Road, improvements to the Avery Road/US 33/SR 161 interchange, and the construction of turn lanes, traffic signals, etc. The existing TIF can be applied to this development. The improvements to the US 33/SR 161/Avery-Muirfield interchange are underway with completion in late 2000. . Perimeter Drive currently terminates within the Riverside Hospital PCD and will be extended through the Perimeter West site (and this site) north to Post Road. This will be financed through the TIF. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Staff Report -February 17, 2000 Page 17 Architecture: • Under the proposed text, all buildings and associated structures must be harmonious in character and reflect an upscale, high quality, office park. All buildings must have the same degree of finish on all sides. Stone, brick, or decorative precast panels will be the dominant materials. Dryvit and other similar accent materials will be limited to 15 percent of the exterior area. Facade colors and materials on individual buildings must compliment each other. Architectural standards will also be included in deed restrictions. Landscaping/Tree Preservation: • The text states that landscaping for each individual building site must be consistent with other "Class A" office campus developments in Dublin (such as Metro Center and Upper Metro Place). Landscaping must also comply with the Landscape Code. The existing trees ""u along US 33/SR 161 should be incorporated into the design, and the species of the new plantings should be coordinated with the Riverside and Perimeter West PCDs. The street trees and the Post Road buffer should also continue the Riverside and Perimeter West PCD landscaping. • This site abuts residentially zoned property to the north and west, requiring an opaque six- foot high buffer plus one large or medium deciduous shade tree every 40 feet. • Water features compliment any site, especially a large office park. The text states that emphasis shall be placed on high-quality landscaping, and where practical, water features. Additionally, where practical, pedestrian access and seating- areas will be incorporated in proximity to ponds and water features. The exact locations and sizes of any water features are undetermined. • There are a number of trees on the site, mainly around the perimeter, and the Tree Preservation Ordinance will be applied here. A preliminary tree survey, indicating general information, has been submitted. The site has approximately 120 trees of six-inch caliper or greater. A tree preservation plan showing species type and their exact location, proposed utilities, tree protection fencing, and grading must also be submitted. Signage/Lighting/Waste Management: • The proposed text states that all signs must comply with the Sign Code. Two identification signs are proposed for the development, one along Perimeter Drive and the other along US 33/SR 161. A maximum area of 80 square feet and a height of six feet are proposed. Both signs will be monument-type ground signs, with design and location subject to Planning Commission approval. Having the same developer, staff believes this development should be incorporated with Perimeter West for signage purposes. If this is not possible, it should be limited to one such sign. The text states that wall signs are prohibited unless specifically approved by the Commission. The Commission and City Council have repeatedly disapproved wall signs oriented toward US 33/SR 161. All light fixtures must be cut-off type, and all poles and wall-mounted fixtures must be of the same type. All parking lot poles must be dark brown, black, or bronze-colored metal, up to 28 feet. All lighting must comply with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and should coordinate with adjacent development. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Staff Report -February 17, 2000 Page is Utilities: • Water service will be provided for the site via the 12-inch waterline to be extended along Perimeter Drive. Additionally, a 16-inch waterline is located along the south side of Post Road. Sanitary sewer service will be provided via the existing 21-inch Indian Run Interceptor Sewer that runs along Post and Liggett Roads. • Stormwater management must comply with the Stormwater Regulations. Stormwater calculations have not yet been submitted. The use of wet basins is encouraged to meet the Stormwater regulations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As amended, the proposed development is characterized by high quality and would create a new corporate gateway into Dublin as outlined in the Community Plan. Staff recommends approval with nine conditions: Conditions: 1) That the text be revised to indicate full compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan (including right-of--way dedication), and the Stormwater Regulations; 2) That site plan design reflect the gateway nature of this site, subject to staff approval; 3) That the landscape treatment, including street trees, along all roads be consistent with the property to the east; 4) That a revised tree preservation plan be submitted indicating species type, size, location, and removal/preservation status; 5) That the South Fork of the Indian Run corridor be preserved and augmented by reforestation and the installation of a pedestrian path system, subject to staff approval; 6) That the text be revised to limit the development to one identification sign; 7) That a vacation plat be secured by the applicant for any unused portion of Liggett Road; 8) That Liggett Road be utilized as a service road only until it is improved to meet current City standards, with access points approved by the City Engineer; and 9) That all conditions be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council. r.. Bases: 1) This use and design are consistent with the Future Land Use and the "US 33/SR 161 Edge" Area Plan of the Community Plan 2) This proposal meets the PCD requirements of Section 153.058 of the Zoning Code. 3) The plan, as modified above, is consistent with the PCD requirements in the adjacent development. 4) With the implementation of recommended road network improvements, traffic movements operate at acceptable levels of service. . I ~ ~ wYLr:R cr. dw a ~ ~..y HOL ~ ~ 1c ~ ~ yod , ~ A IROYAL PLt11[E M O~ 4 DDRR HOP 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G~" ~ S,~ 1 ~ ~ M 4 0~0~ ,cam" ~d 1 ~ ~ pop°s ~ ~ ~ ~ b 33 ~ `a'~ 1 > P8 ~ Ct ~ .0 1 i PARK DR ,~0~ O r G/ ` vtzo p0 ~ ~ ~ ~ otsiN Ro ~ Q k t OTiALA GRANGE DR 1~j~~ ' `'`R 0~, ~ ~ E . Y FA i DR RDEN i FARI(S PWKWY - ~ POST RD ~ ~ Lw~ Loop , .SITE PERDIETER DR PERD[ETER DR r _ . _ .~w4' tAOP 1 ~ y ~b 1 ~ a uz PARK ~ ~ '0~ _,_J 1 1 a a~ i 1 1 1 J 1 0 5IttER RINGS RD P~ SHIER LN 1 ~ IRELAN PL ~ HOLIDAY LN 1 G VttI1?G 1 1 1 z 1 _ , DAN-SHERRt r AVE g~,1dDY RINGS OVA'f8 , ~ r-~ KENDALL ~ 1 yd~d a HLVD. p ~ ~ 1 ~ CORLEY DR ARNN ~ ~ 100 2l)OO 1 R u .ecuDl Y. RD Xf SCALE IN FEET ~ 1 IN EQUALS 1200 FT 00-0042 ~ Rezoning Application Perimeter/Liggett o ~c~, x R-Y PLR r G 33 R-1 P . D R PUD -1 PST RD RI ~ - PCD TE p D ~E P I R b a A O a w a GI SHIER R1NCS D o ~ i R oo-oo4z Rezoning Application Perimeter/Liggett I _A Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -February 17, 2000 ' Page 14 r. Fishman suggested that the m -up sign be placed at the school. a said he would like the n text to read: "Sample Chang a sign - If you have comments, call Dave Marshall, 761-65 He said if the neighbors do no ject to it, he doesn't. He said he had received very negativ omments from residents about a signs at Riverside Elementary and the Northwest Career ter. Mr. Sprague asked if the two Brent sized letters could be o e mock-up sign. Mr. klider said he appreciated Mr. He frankness. However, h id the consensus of the Co ion was that two different signs shou erected for comparison oses. Mr. Fishman made otion that this Code amendment is to and Mr. McCash sec ed the motion. The vote was follows: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lec yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; and Mr. n, yes. (Tabled 5-0.) 5. Rezoning Application 00-0042 - Perimeter/Liggett Chad Gibson presented this composite plan under the PCD provisions of Section 153.058. He distributed a revised list of.conditions to the Commissioners. He said the site is approximately 41 acres located between Post Road and US 33/SR 161, mainly east of Liggett Road. He showed several slides. There are two parcels; one of 40 acres .and a 0.7-acre parcel owned by the City. This is a request to rezone from R, Rural District to PCD, Planned Commerce District. Mr. Gibson said this development text is almost identical to that of Perimeter West, but without hotels. It is for office and institutional uses. A vacant home is located on the site. The South Fork of the Indian Run cuts through the northwest portion of this site. Mr. Gibson said the stream protection area. should include 50 feet on both sides of the stream. He said staff would like to see more trees planted. He said staff has narrowed it to 50 feet on both sides of the stream. The Community Plan also calls for the provision of a pedestrian path (a greenbelt linkage issue). The tree rows on the site are mainly on the periphery and a small one in the middle of the site. A tree preservation master plan will be needed at the time of the first development plan. Mr. Gibson said the City has hired a consultant to study the interchange and the results should be in by the end of this year. He said some major improvements are needed. The interchange will fail by the year 2003, with or without this development. Mr. Gibson said a vacant industrial use (formally Remarks) was located north of the site. Perimeter Drive will be extended west to meet Post Road, cutting through the northeast corner of the site. The main access into the site will be from Perimeter Drive at this location. He said staff would like to limit Liggett Road to service traffic unless it is upgraded to current City standards. Staff would like to see a linkage provided from Perimeter Drive to Liggett Road. Any unused portion of Liggett Road may be vacated by plat. Mr. Gibson said ancillary commercial uses such as daycare and restaurants within a building primarily devoted to office or institutional uses are permitted. The maximum density is 9,000 square feet per acre. The maximum lot coverage for the entire site is 60 percent with any _ _ . ~ a . _ _ ~ _ . ~ ' bublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 2000 Page 15 individual lot approaching 65 percent. Architectural materials are consistent with those at Perimeter West (brick, stone, precast and concrete panels). He said the Commission packets included a supplemental traffic study and a memo from the Engineering Division. The signage will be per Code. Two center identification signs have been requested as well as individual signage. Staff believes if the site is developed as a one user campus, the two signs would be okay. However, if it is divided into multiple users, staff would recommend the site be restricted to one development sign for the entire site. Mr. Gibson said staff recommends approval with amended conditions: 1) That the text be revised to indicate full compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan (including right-of--way dedication), and the Stormwater Regulations; 2) That the six near-term traffic improvements as listed in the Assistant City Engineer's memo, dated February 7, 2000, be completed before issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit, subject to staff approval; 3) That site plan design reflect the gateway nature of this site, subject to staff approval 4) That the landscape treatment along all roads, including street trees, be consistent with the property to the east; 5) That a master tree preservation plan for the PCD site be submitted concurrent with the first development plan, indicating species type, size, .location, and removal/preservation status; 6) That the South Fork of the Indian. Run corridor be preserved and augmented by reforestation (within 50 feet on each side of the stream) and the installation of a pedestrian path system, subject to staff approval; 7) That the text be revised to limit the development to one identification sign, unless the 41 acres is developed as a single user campus, in which case two development signs would be permitted; 8) That a vacation plat be secured by the applicant for any unused portion of Liggett Road; 9) That Liggett Road be utilized as a service road only until it is improved to meet current Ciry standards, with access points approved by the City Engineer; and 10) That all conditions are met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council. Mr. Sprague said there was a discussion at the January 20 meeting regarding the need for certain width-parking spaces. With one or two turnovers during the day, perhaps an 8%s-foot space would be adequate. This proposal is for eight-foot wide parking spaces. He understood that the density was highly attractive and it is very much appreciated. Mr. Gibson said parking within the development would comply with Code. Any surplus parking can be eight by sixteen-foot spaces with 22-foot aisles. Mr. Sprague said at BMW, the parking spaces were striped at 8%2 feet. He thought spaces should be nine feet wide except where there is low turnover. Mr. Lecklider said he was concerned about the SR 161/LJS 33/Post Road interchange failure with or without development. Mr. Gibson said an engineering firm has been hired, and the study will be available late this year. He did not think the interchange was part of any CIP. He said the original study for Perimeter West would fail in approximately three years. . a: Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -February 17, 2000 " Page 16 Mr. Lecklider asked about the Perimeter West staging of development, based on traffic improvements. Mr. Gibson said the first phase (160,000 squaze feet) required certain sections of Perimeter Drive and Perimeter Loop to be completed. When that number is exceeded, Perimeter Drive would have to be extended to Post Road. He said the four phases were outlined in the traffic study provided. He understood that Perimeter Drive to Post Road would be completed this year as part of the TIF for Rail Van. Mr. Gibson said the overall density was 9,000 squaze feet per acre, just like Perimeter West. Mr. Lecklider said as there is development to the west, the traffic may flow west. He wondered r~ if the failure of the interchange is hastened with this development. ..r Paul Hammersmith said the traffic study reviewed two conditions, the neaz term .conditions (2001 and 2002) and along-term condition (2020). He said all recommendations Mr. Gibson referred to in his amended conditions referred to the neaz term conditions. He said the 2020 traffic volumes are not necessazily all being generated by the development, and the interchange was not identified as failing in the near-term conditions. It was identified as failing in the long- term conditions, or needing to be addressed. That is based on projected traffic volume in the year 2020. He said those traffic volumes are not necessarily all being generated by the development of this site, nor the Perimeter West site. It is the entire traffic analyses zone that was examined for that entire region. Mr. Hammersmith said there would not necessarily be a failure, but a decrease in the level of service level in the near term. Future developments and future traffic studies will be used to monitor the interchange. Mr. Lecklider predicted that when the Avery Road overpass was complete, it would be used instead of the Post Road interchange. His concern was that Avery Road level of service may not improve after the improvements aze done due to increased development at Post Road. Mr. Lecklider asked who was paying for the interchange justification study. Mr. Hammersmith said past studies he was familiar with were paid with state and federal funding. Mr. Lecklider asked about local funding. Mr. Hammersmith said there was a percentage paid for by the local governments. Mr. Lecklider asked if a developer might contribute. Mr. Hammersmith said it was not necessarily developer driven. It was access driven. Tim Kelton said they worked with staff on the vaziety of conditions listed above and agreed with them as listed. He said they were also concerned about the failure of the interchange. He said it was important to note that it will fail by 2003. The traffic generated by this site is a fraction of .what it has to beaz. Mr. Lecklider said that was a good point. Mr. Kelton distributed a copy of the latest TIF agreement. He said the Rail Van project was neazing closure. It funds many of the needed improvements for the area. Provided that each developer signed the TIF agreement, as they move forward, then each of the revenues generated by any development will be captured to pay for those road improvements. He said the TIF agreement is ready to be signed. _ W _ . . ' Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -February 17, 2000 Page 17 Mr. Kelton said the first phase of the TIF includes all the extension to the ramp, the tie-in and re- routing of Post Road and Perimeter Loop Drive to Rail Van's second curbcut, and all the pertinent water, sewer, and utility lines. He pointed to later phases under the TIF. Mr. Lecklider said his primary concern was one of traffic. He appreciated the density proposed at m9,000 square feet. The viability of these sites depends on moving traffic through them. Mr. Fishman asked if there were any billboards on the site. Mr. Kelton said there was one that advertised Gorden Farms. He said it could be taken down the day they close. Mr. Fishman wanted that to be a condition. Mr. Kelton said a Harley-Davidson sign was not on their site. However, he said as they acquire the site, billboards will be removed. Mr. Kelton said the development text calls for the .parking spaces to comply with Code and any excess spaces above Code could be compact type spaces. He said parking would be addressed with each individual building. Mr. Lecklider asked if Mr. Kelton agreed with Condition 3. Mr. Kelton agreed. Mr. Kelton said no relocation of the South Fort of the Indian Run was proposed. Mr. Peplow said he noticed that staggered hours only applied most of the time to starting. He said everyone seemed to leave at the same time. Mr. Fishman made a motion to approve this rezoning because the use and design are consistent with the Future Land Use and the "US 33/SR 161 Edge" Area Plan of the Community Plan; it meets the PCD requirements of Section 153.058; it is consistent with the PCD requirements in the adjacent development; and with the implementation of recommended road network improvements, traffic movements operate at acceptable levels of service; with 11 conditions: 1) That the text be revised to indicate full compliance with the Thoroughfare Plan (including right-of--way dedication), and the Stormwater Regulations; 2) That the six near-term traffic improvements as listed in the Assistant City Engineer's memo, dated February 7, 2000, be completed before issuance of a certificate of occupancy permit, subject to staff approval; 3) That site plan design reflect the gateway nature of this site, subject to staff approval; 4) That the landscape treatment along all roads, including street trees, be consistent with the property to the east; 5) That a master tree preservation plan for the PCD site be submitted concurrent with the first development plan, indicating species type, size, location, and removal/preservation status; 6) That the South Fork of the Indian Run corridor be preserved and augmented by reforestation (within 50 feet on each side of the stream) and the installation of a pedestrian path system, subject to staff approval; 7) That the text be revised to limit the development to one identification sign, unless the 41 acres is developed as a single user campus, in which case two development signs would be permitted; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -February 17, 2000 Page 18 8) That a vacation plat be secured by the applicant for any unused portion of Liggett Road; 9) That Liggett Road be utilized as a service road only until it is improved to meet current City standards, with access points approved by the City Engineer; 10) That all conditions be met prior to this case being scheduled for City Council; and 11) That all billboards be removed from the site 30 days after Council approval. Mr. Sprague seconded the motion and the vote was as follows: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; and Mr. Fishman. (Approved 5-0.) f~. Informal -Concept Plan 00 08I -Humbert Property Prior to the meeting,. this case was 'thdrawn by letter from the a licant's representative, Michael L. Close. Property owners wer otified. 7. Code Amendment 98-106ADM -Fence C Kim Littleton 'said this code amendment was led after .review on Octobe 7. Issues discussed include~~,the height and location of solid ces and open fences. A de 'tion of a retaining wall was ded. No solid or perimeter fen 'ng was desired by the Co fission. Solid fences needed to close to the residence, and not sed to enclose a larger area ' the rear or front yard.. The rrent seven-foot height limit was oo tall. The Commission fo nd at open perimeter fences a only appropriate on estate-s' lots, minimum 30,000 squa f Mr. Littleton said the mmission could not support o fencing in the front yard, es 'ally on smaller lots. The ommission thought hedges wer better means to provide privac round the lot. Mr. Littleto said masonry fences in the ont yard were seen to be inappr riate on standard lots, but appr riate along scenic roads. a said the latest Code revisio deal with the location and hei t of solid fences, location a d height of open fences, and h w front yard fences along scenic oads. He showed several sli s. A four-foot tall, open ce is proposed within the b ' dable area of the lot in this re 'sion. Mr. Littleton said the wo "forward" was mistakenly icken in the draft. It should ad ""'i "forward of the principal stru ture" . The Commission supp ed accent fencing in the front r re yard. He said an open our-foot high fence, within a buildable area of the lot is pe 'tted in the front yard. All fe ces permitted are limited to fo feet. Mr. Mc sh asked if a short fence not nclosing an area was defined a fence or decorative element. .Littleton said it could be med as an accent for a visual reak. Mr. McCash recommende at in the definition, the wor "fence" not be used, but "acce Mr. Littleton said a Code would also permit a ow-rise accent or open fence. He said the view triangle from driveway should not be bl ed. He said staff recommend that it be limited to two feet for ick or stone, and higher for accent fence. Mr. McCash s ' most of the typical details fora ry-laid stone fence are at a 2 "height. } PERIMETER/LIGGETT .REZONING _ _ ~ 1 1 \ _ ~ -1 ~ r ~ " \ ~ 1 ' ~ ~ .leEnr sager ~Q 1 Oeriey PCIA F~° \ ~ II 1 G `q ~ i~ 1 1 1 I 'P \ ~ ~ wenlllESr wrnl.el.r or eoo s 1 ammx vcl 1 1 1 1 ?os Im.uos as , ~ \ mss" • ' ~ 111 1 I` ~ ~1 1 i t - . 1 ;1 _ _ a a i ~ ~171a"~ aJ 11 .J 11 « 1 1~ ~ I~r ` %1 ISO.m'~1 ac 5, p ~ _ 1~ 1 ~ J'r W 20000 1 _ r1 + 1 1NOUN IKIN ~ 1 1 p ~ NRR?_YTOR SEr401 ~ a-_-- _ ii i < l _ _ r .1 \ - _ d j ~ 100-rR Rgppplµ Y' 11, ~ i 1 ? a ~ ~ ' . - ' 1 use rrwsr ~m,% - 1- - - ? N g10e AC L s ` ~ xs+' 1 aa141wrm •.Irtlllcresar I 11 ? ~ - 1 1 ? I i ` ~ ~ ?1 ~ 00-0042 Rezoning Application PerimeterlLiggett CITY OF DUBLIN 5200 Emerald Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017-1066 ie/IDD:6l4-161-6500 Fax: 614-161-6590 Yr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Dublin City Council has scheduled a public hearing/second reading for Ordinance No. 19-00 at the Monday, Apri13, Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7 p.m. and is held in Council Chambers. Public testimony will be taken at that time. The title of Ordinance No. 19-00 reads as follows: An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 40.79 Acres Located on the East and West Sides of Liggett Road, approximately 1,250 Feet South of Post Road, From: R, Rural District To: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Perimeter/Liggett- Case File No. 00-0042 ) Anne C. Clarke Clerk of Council 761-6500 March 13, 2000 P:\DATA\COUNCIL\NOTICE\PUBHEAR\ 19-OOLiggett.doc . _ COt~ PT PLAN APPLICATION (Code Section 153.US6) w~; ) TO EY.PIRE CCf'1' (fF INllif.l;1 City Council Meeting _ Cfi Ci8'.N.1 Sltirr flings Road CI:)' Council Actioc Dublin, Ohio 43016 f'honcliT)D:614~761-6550 FaK: 614/'761-6`_'i56 FUR UFFICE USE OPJLY - . ArnountRecefved:w/-~' ApplicationNo:~ P8ZDate(5): /y P87_ ct(on: Receipt No: MIS Fee No: Date Received; Received t3y. Typo of Request:( ~ _ ? PLEASE SULfJIiT ONE (1) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND fJOTARiZED APPLICATION -PLEASE PRINT-- AND TIIIP.TEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION L Pi?Of'ERTY IfJFORfJ1AT10N TAY ID IJO/ Parcel Size: DISTRICT PARCEL fJO: (Acres) Property Address: None Property Location: Side ofSireet: (tJ,s,E,w)(N) post Road• (W) Metatec Blvd. • S Wall fl~arestlntersection: Metatec B1Vd. & POSt Road DiGtance from Nearest Intersection: N, S, E, W from Nearest Intersection Existing Land Use/Development: Undeveloped Proposed Land Use/Development: Residential Current or Existing Zoning District: Perimeter Cen ~Tl.; C..~Li,iT: State briefly hour the proposed zoning and developm^nt ret~+~~ t~ q.•o~+..._ - ~ .,.,unity. - V SUBMRTED TO COUNCIL See At tachmen~,,,,_,_„_. ~ ~ ~ FOR MEETING ON ~ JUL 11999 ~ F~~.E copy Page 1 of 3 Concept Plan Application slnrl_r,~l=rJT: ' StTlc briefly how the proposed ; vnuig and development relates to the Dublin Convnunity Plan. See Attachment IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COh1POSITE OR PRELINIRJARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES NO ? IF /1 PLAfJNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES ~ NO ? II. PLE/1SE INCLUD[ THE FOLLOWING: 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p g ~ ~ ~ n q~ Legal description of ttie property to be rezoned consist of a e s . p / PU11J REQUIREMENTS: 14 SETS OF PL11NS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24" X 36") SHOWING: a. The site and all land 500 feet beyond the boundaries b. North arrow and bar scale c. Existing conditions (Roads, buildings, vegetation, topography with slope classification, jurisdictional boundaries, utilities, surface drainage and areas subject to flooding, etc.) d. Proposed Uses (Regional transportation system, densities, # of dwellings, buildinglunit types, square footages, parkland/open space, acreages, etc.) e. Existing and proposed zoning district boundaries i. Size of the site in acreslsquare feet; and ~ g. All property lines, abutting property boundaries, street rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries. 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11" X 1T') 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/z" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16"X20") Showin Conti uous ro ertv ovmers within 500 feet from the rimeter of the roe III. COtJTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS List all neighboring property owners within 150 feet from the perimeter of the property. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE (not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) See Attached 5'~~ ~x~ ~p l l I - I I ~I - - 1 !r I~~a ~ _ P IV. PROPERTY OWNER R<f ~Rh7ATION ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ` B A' ~~/'1~ / /1 Q Page 2 of 3 r? L Cio~ncept Plan Applicati(on~ / .~w, Name o/Current Property Owner(s): Continental/NRI Ventures Ltd. C 0 aSS Malting Address: ' (street, cay, state, zip c«le> P . 0 . Box 712 Dublin, OH 43017 Daytime Telephone: 2 21-18 OO Fax: Name of Contact Person", (ex. Attorne~~, Architect, etc): "Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. Gary Gray Mailing Address: Homestead Communities 150 E. Broad St. Columbus, OH 4321 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: Fax: 221-1800 221-3567 Which of the above is the primary contact person? Gar Gra + V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and northwest Franklin County has stretched the Citys capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date. The Applicant~Owner hereby acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City o1 Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Applicant. VII. OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATNE I, ,the owner and applicant, hereby authorize to ad as my representative and agent in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application including modifying the project, and I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent. Signature of Current Property fHmer: ~ o ~~-1-~ .2 ~yp~~ e..~ '~I erF~v.,,~s~ ~--~'o. Date: g'y ~ / ~ rl Signature of Current Property (honer: Date: VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF ~ D COUNTY OF ~Z~~L~ j 1. ~~12~~ C ` ~ ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read and und°rstand tlw contents of this appli~tion. The information caitained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all recpQCts true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. SlpnAture of Applicant or ~ ~ Date• ~ r/~~j Authorized P.~;~^ • --t~ttve: l r 7 Subscribed and sworn to bef~. _ - 1 ~ ~ _ /~q9 , _ iru.aiy rtiuu.. R ryrn~ R °,,,aia~"s° l5 ~ V l5 I L E C O P ll ~9C =:;a~ o r ~Iy~~~ .All.. _ 11999 ~9V Page 3 of 3 ~ Concept Plan Application 9 1 ~ ~ U I \ ~ - O \ I ~ V rZ € ~ C"- 1 ~ 3~ 3 _ _ ~ v W ~ r ~ ~ ~ ' ; ~ i. ~ .ter ~ ~ ~ ~ ,J I. M ~ - i I ll, L i ~ ~ ~ m U ' 1 ) ~ ,i S ~ ~ n ~ G I w - _ I' ~ _ - r , X~. ~ i i ~ i~ y ~ _ ~ O {z~~ ~ i f~ ] ~ I it . ~ ~ i ~ ~ d ~ _ ~ ~ 0 z 3 r n~- x n m o n m> ~I ~ ~ ~ R~~~~~E~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ S "z~ ~ ~a s ~ ~ W i T - `f _ , I 1 [s1 m / r / ~o ~ ,x ~ a s g _ ~ ~ I _ , g ~ - / - ~ / ti~~~~ x yrF~ 93 ~ir§~ w ~ ~ r~ f' ~ ~ _ . ~ • ~ i~ ~ ` y _ ~ ' - ~ t - ~ f, 'Lt'~ t fl: ~ „1~. v/~,~~ l P ~ ti ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ Sp pq r w _ _ `y ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ,r S ~ r _ ~ til'°~„1 ~ i~ ! ~ ~g ~ ~x~ w _ , ~ . a. ~ C'7 O -~G 4 I r 1' i fly ;~(I± ~J ~ ~ ~ ~~~r~~ ~ z ~ ~ ` s ~ ~ 1 ~ n ~ ~ -J 1111 l ~ ` ~ i z tl~~~ 1 l~- f~ l~ i, ~ ,i ~ ~ i,;. ~ ~ a .t. _1 I'. f. J f 1p ~ ~ / ~'~j. 1' t ~ ~ ~ O 7 ° it l I rl ~ { { ~1 tila ' ~I f~'. ! ~ _ { ~ ~ r, S j f1~ ~ r " -Y_~ \ Nr v ~ G~ r u ~ ~ I I ~ fi"~",ti 5 _ Ali E~ ~ -t~l fi~j',, I ~ ~ ~ ~ r r~rrrt , ~ , ~ ~ j i~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~jj~ 'A f { ~ u ~ rj 1 ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ C i ~ j~ 4 ~ ,i _ _ r 11h . A ^ ~;I ~ ~ l -V Preliminary Development Standards Perimeter Center Sub Area B Current Zoning: Planned Commercial District Proposed Zoning: Multifamily Residential Owner: Continental /NRI Ventures Ltd. Applicant: Homestead Communities LLC Date: June 30, 1999 Use: Empty nester condominiums. Total number of units = 75 owner occupied units on 22 acres = 3.4 DUA Parkland: Required; 4.62 acres, Provided; 8.14. Detention lake will be improved with walking paths, benches, etc. to make it part of the required Parkland dedication. Setbacks: Along Post Road: Building: 100' Pavement: 100 average' Along Wall Street: Building 40' Pavement 1 S' Along Metatec: Building 40' Pavement 25' Sideyards: 25' Landscape Buffer: Along Post Road: Where residential units are fronting Post: Lawns with residential scale and type of plant materials. Where residential units are not fronting on Post, then there will be mounding and plantings. Along Wall Street: Fencing, lawns, and residential type and scale plant materials. Building material: Siding: Werzalite Hardboard siding, wood trim, brick and/or cultured stone. Roof: Asphalt shingles Windows: Vinyl r r'° ,lm ~~~o~~ t ~i l~ i ' i i 1 5 JUL 11~9~ ~ ~ it - - ' -'~3-~F~` ~~F Ql1~L~~~ STATEMENT: Exhibit A Briefly state how the proposed development and zoning relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity. 1. Current development along either side of Post Road is predominantly residential. 2. Approved zoning for development south of Post Road is Community Commercial. 3. A point of interface between the residential and the commercial is inevitable. ~ 4. Our development would move that interface from Post Road to Wall Street. 5. Existing residents would not be on the front line of transitional uses. 6. Our use is owner occupied condominiums. 7. Our density and orientation is a better point of interface between the two dissimilar uses than the existing condition. 8. Units will be an average of about $225,000 in price, with high quality, low maintenance exterior materials, and in a style similar to other residences along Post Road. STATEMENT: EXHIBIT B Briefly state how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan. 1. Helps establish and maintain the residential character of Post Road as a scenic roadway. 2. Rather than Post Road being a strip of pavement between two uses, it will be a unifying element tying similar uses together. 3. Housing for empty nesters is critical to the continued vitality of Dublin. Locating this type of residential use near shopping and recreational uses will permit residents to partake of the riches of Dublin, without the necessity of driving great distances. c r `f , 7 3 € - ~ ' ~ awe-.....,-_. : ...,...r.+..e _ ~ REV: March 1, 1999 October 7, 1998 DESCRIPTION OF A 22.462 ACRE TRACT ON POST ROAD AT METATEC BOULEVARD DUBLIN, OHIO, FOR CONTINENTAL/NRI OFFICE VENTURES LTD. Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, partially in Virginia Military Survey No. 2542 and partially in Virginia Military Survey No. 2999, and being a portion of an original 42.592 acre tract of land conveyed to ContinentaUNRI Office Ventures ltd. by deed of ' record in Instrument 199808210213135, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set in the south line of Post Road (60 feet wide), at the point of tangency at the east end of the curve connecting the south line of Post Road with the east line of Metatec Boulevard (variable width) (originally Discovery Boulevard), as Post Road is shown upon "Post Road, Wilcox Road, Perimeter Drive & Easements Dedication Plat", of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and as Metatec Boulevard is shown upon "Dedication of Discovery Boulevard & Easements", of record in Plat Book 66, Page 97, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; thence N 88° 07' 20" E along the south line of Post Road and along a north line of said original 42.592 acre tract a distance of 598.12 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a point of curvature; thence easterly along the curved south line of Post Road, along a curved north line of said origi- nal 42.592 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 5,759.70 feet and delta = 2° O 1' 00", a chord distance of 202.72 feet bearing N 87° 06' S0" E to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at the point of tangency; thence N 86° 06' 20" E along the south line of Post Road and along a north line of said original 42.592 acre tract a distance of 342.76 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a corner of said original 42.592 acre tract, in the west line of an original 2.024 acre tract of land conveyed to Camberlane Associates by deed of record in Official Record 11732, Page E 17, Recorder's Of- ftce, Franklin County, Ohio, and at the southwest corner of a 0.234 acre tract of land conveyed out of said original 2.024 acre tract to The City of Dublin, Ohio, for Post Road right-of--way pur- poses by deed of record in Official Record 13444, Page J 06, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; thence S 3° 54' 20" E along a line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along a portion of the west line of said original 2.024 acre tract a distance of 240.18 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and at the southwest corner of said original 2.024 acre tract; thence N 86° 06' 20" E along a north line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along the south line of said original 2.024 acre tract a distance of 332.49 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and at the southeast corner of said original 2.024 acre tract; R JUL - 7 fQ~9 98- 73 2 462.DOC Page 1 of , > a , thence N 3° 54' 20" W along a line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along a portion of the east line of said original 2.024 acre tract a distance of 202.28 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set in the curved south line of Post Road, at the southeast corner of said 0.234 acre tract and at a corner of said origina142.592 acre tract; thence southeasterly along a portion of the curved south line of Post Road, along a curved north line of said original 42.592 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 308.83 feet and sub-delta = 7° 58' 00", a sub-chord distance of 42.91 feet bearing S 61° 13' 40" E to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at the point of tangency; thence S 57° 14' 40" E along the south line of Post Road and along a north line of said original 42.592 acre tract a distance of 422.32 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at the northeast corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and in the west line extended northerly of Lot Number One (1) in "Metro North Business Park", as shown of record in Plat Book 66, Page 71, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; thence S 2° 53' O1" E along a portion of the east line of said origina142.592 acre tract, along the west line extended northerly of said Lot No. 1 and along a portion of the west line of said Lot No. 1 a distance of 908.74 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at the northeast corner of a 4.230 acre tract of land conveyed to Perimeter A, Ltd., by deed of record in Instrument 1998 1 1 190298745 (passing a point in the south line - to the east - of Post Road and at the north- west corner of said Lot No. 1 at 12.30 feet); thence S 87° 06' S9" W along the north line of said 4.230 acre tract a distance of 383.00 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set; thence N 5° 52' 35" W crossing a portion of said original 42.592 acre tract a distance of 510.27 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a point of curvature; thence northwesterly crossing a portion of said origina142.592 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 250.00 feet, and delta = 86° 00' OS", a chord distance of 341.00 feet bearing N 48° 52' 37" W to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set; thence S 88° 07' 20" W crossing a portion of said original 42.592 acre tract and along a south line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along the north line of Wall Street (60 feet wide), as shown upon the plat entitled "Dedication of Discovery Boulevard, Perimeter Drive, Wall Street and Easements" of record in Plat Book 72, Pages 79 and 80, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio a distance of 898.09 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a point of curvature; thence westerly along a portion of the curved north line of Wall Street, along a curved line of said original 42.592 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 1,030.00 feet and sub-delta = 2° 44' 17", a sub-chord distance of 49.22 feet bearing S 86° 45' 12" W to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and at the southeast corner of a 1.432 acre tract of land conveyed to Ruma Investment Company by deed of record in Offi- cial Record 18377, Page I 18, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio; thence N 4° 36' S7" W along a west line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along the east line of said 1.432 acre tract a distance of 187.16 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a corner of said origina142.592 acre tract and at the northeast corner of said 1.432 acre tract; 98-173D22 462.DOC Page 2 of 3 e s thence S 89° 07' 19" W along a line of said original 42.592 acre tract and along the north line of said 1.432 acre tract a distance of 303.95 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set in the east line of Metatec Boulevard (60 feet wide), at a corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and at the north- west corner of said 1.432 acre tract; thence N 0° 52' 41" W along the east line of Metatec Boulevard and along a west line of said origina142.592 acre tract a distance of 52.32 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a point of cur- vature; thence northerly along the curved east line of Metatec Boulevard (variable width), along the curved west line of said origina142.592 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 500.00 feet and delta = 6° 31' 11", a chord distance of 56.87 feet bearing N 2° 22' S5" E to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at the point of tangency; thence N 5° 38' 30" E along the east line of Metatec Boulevard and along a west line of said original 42.592 acre tract a distance of 121.03 feet to a 3/4-inch I.D. iron pipe set at a point of curvature at the south end of said connecting curve; thence northeasterly along said connecting curve, along the curved northwest line of said 42.592 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 30.00 feet and delta = 82° 28' 50", a chord distance of 39.55 feet bearing N 46° 52' S5" E to the place of beginning; containing 22.462 acres of land more or less and being subject to all easements and restrictions of record. The above description was prepared by Kevin L. Baxter, Ohio Surveyor No. 7697, of C.F. Bird & R.J. Bull, Inc., Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, from actual field surveys performed under his supervision in April, 1975, in October, 1985, in November, 1986, in April, 1990, in July, 1996, and in July, 1998. Basis of bearings is the centerline of Post Road, being N 88° 07' 20" E (east of Metatec Boulevard), as shown of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. ~ ~ Kevin L. Baxter ~ ~ Ohio Surveyor #7697 * €s~T:=F~; ~ 9~5-76~7~~~ ti.~jBT~~~ ~U~4 ` ~ c.~~~' V ~ za. ''4'ywwn,.~r.~~'"~ 98-173D22 462.DOC Page 3 of 3 - ~ n 1Q K._.,.~.~..,.: ~ ~ CII, INC. i ° J~~ ~ j Adjacent Property Owners ~ 7/20/98 ~ ~ . . ; . F Property Owner Prol~eriy Address Mailing Address City of Dublin, Ohio 6565 Commerce Parkway 6565 Commerce Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dahlia, Ohio 43017 Olde Poste Properties Postrear Road c/o Ruscilli Construction Co. Dublin, Ohio 43017 2041 ll.rlingate Lane Columbus, Ohio 43228 Ruscilli Construction. Co, Ia1c. 0 Wilcox Road 2041 l-lrliugate Lane Profit Sharing Plan & Trust Dublin, Ohio 43017 Coltunhus, Ohio 43228 Gordon Plesch Company 5655 Venture Drive 2030 Dividend Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43228 HER Realtors 1.335 Acres on Perimeter Dr. 4656 Executive Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43220 CheckPree Corp. 6000 Perimeter Drive 6000 Perimeter Drive Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Brentlitlger Enterprises 14.5 Acres on Perimeter Dr. 5016 Post Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 4301.7 Metatec Corporation 7001 ~~~ilcox Road 7001 Metatec T3oulevard Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Ohio Credit Union League 5815 Wall Street 1201 Dublin Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Jentgen Klein Company 6631 Commerce Parkway 1550 W. Olcl Henderson Rd Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43220 JA Associates 6751. Commerce Parkway 1550 W. Old I.Ienderson Rd. Dublin, Ohio 4301.7 Columbus, Ohio 43220 Triplex Company 6543 Commerce Parkway 1550 W. Old Henderson Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43220 Triplex Company 6631 Commerce Parkway 1550 W. Old Henderson Rd. Dublin, Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43220 Ralph & Julia I-Ialloran 6124 Post Road 6124 Post Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 4301 ~~/l~i~ Gary & Lori Kinman 6080 Post Road 6080 Post Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 tt Christopher & Deborah Cline GOCO Post Road Renaissance Tower Dublin, Ohio 43017 1201 Elm Street Dallas, TX 7s270 Larry Segner, Tr. 0 Post Road 7340 Dublin Road Dublit:, Ohio 43017 Dublin, Ohio 43017 Albert & Stephanie Da.ntzer s9s2 Post Road Renaissance Tower Dublin, Ohio 43017 1201 Elm Street Dallas, TX 7s270 Todd & Angelilca Parrcll s930 Post Road 42s Walnut Street Dublin, Ohio 430I7 Cincinnati, Ohio 4s201 Gregory & Dotula Anderson s904 Post Road Renaissance Tower Dublin, Ohio 43017 1201 Elm Stt-eet • Dallas, TX 7s270 . Patrick & Valerie Costello s886 Post Road .Renaissance Tower Dublin, Ohio 43017 1201 Elm Street Dallas, TX 7s270 Robert A. Laytxtan III s868 Post Road Renaissance Tower Dublin, Ohio 43017 1201 Elul Street M~ { ~ Dallas, TX 7s270 a-CC. ~V~ , Ruma Investment Company 0701 Disc-every--Boulcvarcl 1 1 s2 Goodale Boulevard Dublin,Ohio 43017 Columbus, Ohio 43212 D~Qna LancaS~~ A ~Yla~ ~a COra~ 2C:\WPWIN\TROTZIPROPOWN.C1t D Bbl l o>?~,~ y3ot1 ~A~~ ~YI SGOI~ ~ ~ E t T{ ipA{~ ~~ptlf ~W ~~P ~c~ qg-o ~ .~.,...w.~.. ._..n..~ ~ _ i _ GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PERIMETER / LIGGETT REVISED FEBRUARY 25, 2000 Description: ' As further described in Exhibit A attached hereto, subject land is bounded by SR 161 and US 33 on the west and south, Perimeter West office development on the east and the proposed extension of Perimeter Drive on the north. General Development Standards 1. It is the intent for this development to be a unified, Class A office and institutional use park. The site plan design shall reflect the gateway nature of this site, subject to staff approval. 2. A mix of mid-rise, signature type office and institutional buildings and low-rise professional medical and office buildings will be promoted. 3. Detailed architectural standards will be set forth in deed restrictions providing for coordinated use of materials and architectural character throughout the development. 4. Signage shape, size, color, and style will be controlled by signage standards set forth for the entire development. In no event shall ground signs exceed a maximum height of 6 feet. All site planning will be done in a manner consistent with prudent planning principles and practice. 5. If these standards conflict in any way with the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances, then the T Planned Commercial District shall prevail. Standards in the City of Dublin Zoning Code applicable to matters not covered in this document shall apply in all such matters not covered. 6. Emphasis shall be placed on high quality landscaping and where practical, water features. Pedestrian access and seating areas shall be incorporated in proximity to ponds and water features. 7. A master tree preservation plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first development plan, indicating species, type, size, location, and removal/preservation status. Landscaping for each individual building site shall be consistent with other "Class A" campus developments in Dublin. 8. Road Improvements to be made prior to development shall incl ~d`e tl~; e~ter~io~ o~ ~ ; Perimeter Drive through the site to its terminus at Post Road. Said i +°e-tfr ~ Y completed by the City of Dublin pursuant to (TIF) Ordinance No. 1 (passed by City fiMY Council on December 13, 1999) on or before December 31, 2000. F E B 2 8 2000 Z ~'I~ f~F ~~aBI~IN 9. The maximum lot coverage permitted shall be not greater than 60% in the aggregate with no individual site having a lot coverage ratio greater than 65%. 10. The maximum building area to be constructed shall be not greater than 9,000 squaze feet per gross acre. Individual sites however may exceed this requirement provided however the overall density shall not exceed an average of 9,000 square feet in the aggregate. 11. When requested by Dublin City Staff, the developer shall prepaze and maintain a log illustrating density and lot coverage for the Perimeter / Liggett Road development. 12. Improvements constructed in conjunction with the development of Perimeter / Liggett shall be in full compliance with the Dublin Thoroughfaze Plan (including right-of--way dedication) and Dublin Stormwater Regulations. 13. Landscape treatments, including street trees along all roads, shall be consistent with the Perimeter West development which is immediately east of subject. 14. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy permit, a vacation plat shall be secured for any unused portion of Liggett Road. 15. All billboards will be removed from the site within thirty (30) days after closing of any sale of the site, but no later than commencement of construction on the property. Specific Development Standards 1.01 Permitted Uses: The uses permitted include: ¦ Those permitted uses listed in the Dublin Zoning Regulations in Section 153.026(A). ¦ General office uses including, without limitation, corporate headquarters and offices of major institutional users. ¦ Ancillary commercial services or restaurant uses within a structure primarily devoted to office or institutional uses. 1.02 Permitted Height and Setback Requirements: 1. Setbacks shall be determined as described below: ¦ Side and rear yards for buildings shall be a minimum of 30 feet. ¦ Side and rear yards for parking areas shall be 10 feet on each side of the property line for a total of 20 feet between areas unless a common parking lot is established. ¦ The maximum height of all buildings shall be 5 stories above grade plus mechanicals and architectural features. Architectural features shall be limited to mechanical screens and skylights. ¦ Buildings shall be limited to 80 feet in height including mechanicals and architectural 2 w treatments. 2. Pavement setbacks shall be the following: ¦ 50 feet from SR 161/33 ¦ 30 feet from Perimeter Drive ¦ 30 feet from Liggett Road 3. Building setbacks shall be the following: ¦ 100 feet from SR 161/33. ¦ For buildings under 60 feet in height (including mechanicals) the minimum setback line shall be 50 feet from Perimeter Drive. ¦ Buildings in excess of 60 feet in height (including mechanicals) shall be setback a minimum of 150 feet from Perimeter Drive. 1.03 Traffic, Circulation, Parking and Loading: 1. Size, ratio, and loading facilities shall be regulated by City of Dublin Zoning Code Sections 153.200 through 153.212. Parking in excess of that required by the Code may be 8' x 16' with 22-foot aisles. 2. Exceptions from strict application of code parking standards may be granted at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. Loading areas shall be screened according to City of Dublin Code Section 153.134. 4. Ingress and egress to and from the site shall be provided along the proposed extension of Perimeter Drive and Liggett Road. Liggett Road shall be utilized as a service road only until it is improved to meet current City standards, with access points approved by the City Engineer. 5. Curb cuts for the Perimeter Drive right-of--way shall be approved in accordance with the City Engineer's direction. 6. Shared drives will be encouraged throughout the development to reduce the number of curb cuts needed. Shared drives may be required for any lot of 250 feet of lot width or less. 7. The six near-term traffic improvements as listed in the Assistant City Engineer's memo, dated February 7, 2000, shall be completed before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy permit, subject to staff approval. 1.04 Waste and Refuse: 1. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened, according to the Dublin zoning code, with walls constructed of materials that coordinate with the 3 materials utilized in the associated structure (i.e. brick, etc). 1.05 Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment, or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure, except during construction. 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be set back from the property line or building edge so as not to be visible from the adjacent property, or shall be screened from public view with landscape materials or materials harmonious with the building. 1.06 Landscaping, Lot Coverage, and Pedestrian Paths: 1. All landscaping shall, at a minimum, be according to the City of Dublin Zoning Code Section 153.134. Landscaping for each individual building site shall be consistent with other "Class A" office campus developments in Dublin. 2. The developer agrees to limit areas of construction activity and implement sedimentation and erosion control measures to minimize erosion during construction. 3. The South Fork of the Indian Run corridor shall be preserved and augmented by reforestation (within 50 feet on each side of the stream) and the installation of a pedestrian path system, subject to staff approval. 1.07 Fences/Walls 1. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted. 1.0$ Signage and Graphics: Except as otherwise herein stated: 1. All Signage and graphics shall conform to the City of Dublin Zoning Code Sections 153.150 through 153.164. 2. All signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks of Sections 153.150 through 153.164, Signs. 3. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 4. No roof signs shall be permitted, nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 5. No flashing, traveling, animated, or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 4 6. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed, other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. 7. If the entire property is developed as a single user campus, two (2) office complex identification monument signs shall be permitted at the following locations: one along Perimeter Drive and one along State Route 161/33. If the property is developed with multiple users, only one complex identification monument sign shall be permitted. Each shall have a maximum copy of 80 square feet and a maximum height of six (6) feet above the adjacent grade. These monument signs shall be constructed of high quality materials and shall be uniform in appearance, and actual placement shall be subject to approval by Planning and Zoning Commission. 8. Temporary development marketing signage shall be permitted. 9. No wall signage shall be permitted unless specifically approved by the Planning Commission. 1.09 Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated, all lighting must conform to the City of Dublin Lighting Guidelines. 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut-off type fixtures. 2. All types of parking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cut-off fixtures, and shall be of the same type and style. 3. All light poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be a dark brown, black or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. h 5. Cut-off type lighting and building uplighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. 7. All building illumination shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of the buildings. 9. All lighting of parking/driving areas and buildings will be designed and constructed so that it will be directed away from adjacent residential properties. 10. Alighting plan conforming to the City's Lighting Guidelines must be submitted to the City as part of the Development Plan. 5 ~..~v ~ . _ 1.10 Architectural Standards: The following standards shall apply and be placed as deed restrictions, also: 1. All buildings and associated structures shall be hazmonious in chazacter, and reflect an upscale, high quality, signature, office park development. Final architectural drawings shall be presented for approval according to the process identified by the Development Plan. 2. All buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. Stone, brick, or decorative precast concrete panels shall be dominant exterior materials. Dryvit and other accent materials shall be limited to a maximum of 15% of the total exterior areas of the building, exclusive of windows. 3. Facade colors and materials on individual buildings shall be coordinated to complement each other. Facade colors of high chroma or intensity are not permitted. 4. Glass and curtain wall color should be coordinated to complement each other and the color palette of the building. Highly reflective "mirror-like" glass shall not be permitted on building facades. 5. No metal panels shall be permitted on building facades except azchitectural metal panels used to screen rooftop mechanical units. 3 c: \fi les\1 iggett\dev_stds. f28 . 6 EISB EEC 6lD 'rv~ 06ZE6 HO 'anglun/o0 OIHO `NI~8f1a ~O Jl1.l~ S106 EEI il9 701 anuany ae~vJuy 5106 SHOA3AN/IS - 51031/HOHY 3dVOSONV7 - SH33Nl°JN3 _ _ o s~lla~do~d ~~d Es~~o~ ~::.o::.:a::::::a:::.~ ° oZm ~ W Nt~ld 311SOdW00 rr w N pH O~'K •i0 PI~IInnY1 ~entl i y PiJ an n ii n ~.7 e o_ o ~ cl ~1 , a__ I a ! Fes--- rc _ ~ Perimel r ~.I O CLV~ f , . dMl uoi6ulyeoM ~ }y II V uI1Q^0)•o0 up„uo~~ ~ c ~ dMl awont• uown k ~n~ o C~ S U In ~ a •d~oC u11QnC a " N,y wog f + •00 ootufl S~,`j~'t~!~A~'~~p ,fury,',"~ G~ Rdcg cg '~~"~i~;ll'~"'~ ~1,~',~N~Yd'iu' M and k Cro c n ~ . ~ J F°c ~ ~ s~ e fi o i • { J~ ~ ~ I I I ~ 1 ~ 'I t~~ y ~ I I ~ I 0 ~ \ s> I \ l l ~P G if l ~ I I ~ I ~ 1 i 1 1 1 \ ~ u I ~ I I ~ / it ~ / ~ I ~ ~ - ~ , 0 ovoa door a~3wlaad ~ / < ~ _ _ slE~l _!yQ}`~NIHSYM NIIBl10 Al 110D I ~ o w r / / dMl ~MI~ (NI~f10) AlN N I l~ ~ a I t? ci / o \ IlV ~o / as \I i r~ / % / /u t07 ~ UN J/'l I aN \ ~l / / ~U WN ~ I I / ~ I J \t / \ ter!\\~_ I 1 / \ / r / 1 f /r/////^////I I t ~ i m^ _ I 1\ ~ .Ja ,LO,LZ.40/N /f , \I w r~l /////j~•/ l z P / / \ \ I r NNNI\J, NO / /r/// / / I I by,ISO~~[F8p ;/I - J/ /I j mnN N~/,,r////r/////r/// i I\II~ 7jH1 / d \ r I r \ - t rn ~ r r I I v i / I ri , / i / 1 t as ~ I, I I I {~.1 }oo ~ r// i^ l / ~ 1 23 3 / %////I I\ a I \m1 o~a ~~~~n / ~ / / /i/~ J~// I \ I zwl ) / / / / / ~pI ~ ~ dM.L 3N~OM3f a 1 I / ` _ / ////,j~/ I / f ~a / Z ~I W~~S- \ I\ II I c i / i ~ % jam/ I I - / IL rF 1 n / / / i.' / l / _ - - - - _ : z -ovoa inn - ;:jam'' y~% I II \ t` J, ~ ZIP I ~ I i I I I _ _ r/ ~ d / III ~ 1\ I of I / I~ / ~ I 1 I ' ` \ I II / ~ / /I / \I \ r l I ~ \ (/4 ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 1 I ~ / 1 I sr ,v .As s - ~ ~ ~~~~..p.,,w,.y,~ai u.a-a b8b6'9L8'b L9 w o aarc vrriv'i¢.cutao'vol~unavn3adn 8ZZ£b HO'sngwn~oJ z o 0 O w anta3eo~ ~ n<~i ~,e e~ a~ '~ni'selri~osso~ tavrans gawvl 1N3Wd0~3n3a ~ ~x ~,~..~r~ aue~ ale6ui~~y IbOZ o[ N s 4 ~ ~ ~.x ~ p a 'dl~ 'O~ 1N3WdO~~n~4 111 ~ J3~21313 W 1~3d ~ g mi~sna ~ i =i o I I r ~ i ~ I~ J Ig i I ~ ~ I I; ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ i ~ I / ~ i i; ~ I I I I I I I I i on . I i I I 1 i I I o I I © ~ ( I ~ ~ I ~ ly I i~ I~ ,g a I~ 0 v ~ Ib ~ F ~ f I ~ ,u ( { I I I i I I ~ f I I I I I ~ I w~ I .o _ i ~ I i F ! , o I i I j ~ ~ m I ~ I I ' I i ~ I I i + ' I I r o I I~ I ~ b~ I I ~ m~ ~ I I i i i i ` ~ I g I j I ~q ~ O 4 O W { I I I I I ~ I I ~ nv.,mq...ni.o wu~..ovyN.w~al ~~.w ~~i co+vno •i;sr no'NO i oN n av a:~uian b9b6'9L8'b L 9 anNUw,iwv~ Meiwr Ni'saivioossv.~avMnnes3wvf 8ZZE4 HO'sngwn~o0 m ~~„~,,,,v,.~,~~.r~;,,,n,~~~fl , ~ ~dLboZ 1N3Wd0~~~3a ~ ~ Z aue a e6ui ~ 'dl~ "O~ 1N3Wd0~3/1~t7 11~ J J 1~l~1 X13 W 1213d N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~i~sn~ i ~ ~ ~ ~t t ~f ° I! ' i ~ ~ ~ i I ` ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ , l 1 'ji ! ~ i ~ r~ ~ r i' I ~ ~ 11~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ i• 1 ~ ~ ~ i if f ~ ~ I ~i ~j r ~ I ~ I ~ Ii ~ ~ ~g j +i I ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ 1 `I i i ` i I ~ cx o ~ ~ ~ ; ! r r ' I ~ ~ ~ i ~ = 1 o ! ~ f ~ ~ ~ I r ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j w r ~ I ~ gig; ' ~ ' 1j ~ ~ i ~ , 1 ~ l j + r I~ ~ ~ ~ ~Ir j r j 1 1 8 j ~ ~ 'f j~ ' ~ 1 1 i ~ t F ~ J 1 ~Ir ' ` , ~ l 1 ~ ! i r 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~i H~ ~ l ! r ~ 1 j , ~ r ~ j ~ t t' i f ~ ~ f ~ f ~ rte ,f ~ ( i • _ _ r . , . w.~ wN,,~.,.,........ ~y.. ~ 9PlL'9YY6T9 •lZZEY NO •N019NIletl xaaan 4Q46.9L9.4 l9 BnNdAtl 3Ntl7'M6{Yl ^JNI'S8IYIJOSSY INVMN(1853WYI gZZ£4 HO 'sngwnpO it \~Wdo~~ 3a 3Nil.l')A.L III:JN~' J<t~\tl\VI 3.111').\Illlll Iv / ` ~ ~ g aue~ ale6ui~Ly 1402 ~ ~ 5 0 ~ ~ m i ~ d ~ ~ n a ^dl~ 'O~ 1N3Wd0~3n~a W ~ ~ o 113~~1~ld313W1~3d ~ 6 i~i~sna m 4 ~I ~ s I ~ ~ I I i .1 ° ~ a I t I y I I ! i ~ u ~ ~ w 1 tw o ~ ~1 1 ~ ,j 1~' ~ ~ ' 4 ` t• ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 'l ~ i~ ~ i I~~ ~ ~ { i ~ # I s 1, o m 1 ~ i ! I b r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ `!I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' I ~ ~9 ~ ~I i j ~1 , j ~ i ~ I ! ~ f ! j o I~ ! ~ ~ I ~r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 1 ! 1 r ~ ~ ! ! f r , J i , I ~ jl fj ~ - 1~ j ~ l^. ~ ~ / ~t! ! ` 5 ~ ~ J rt n ~ ~ ; ~ / ~ l ~ l i X j j r , / ~ ~ / j j j f ~ j / j jj jj , j / f / ~ , f ,'i'j ~ ~ j r; ~ l j ~ , ~ j / ~ ~ j / ' j ~ ~ ! ~ f I ' r~ i r ~ j i •"zr r ~ f~ r i / ' / fr ~ / ~ ~ m ~ ~ wQ ~f- j~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ r / j`/ f~