HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-00 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES
D on Legal Blank Co. Form No 0043
Ig-0~
Ordinance No Passed
An ordinance providing for a change in zoning for 50.8 acres located on the
east side of Hyland-Croy Road, approximately 2,100 feet south of Mitchell-
~3e Dewitt Road, From: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township Zoning
District), to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District (Bishop Parcel
- Case File No. 00-006Z).
NOW, TREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A")
situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PLR, Planned Low Density
Residential District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in
Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning
Code and amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said
real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest
period allowed by law.
Passed this ~ -t~• day of , 2000.
ayor -Presiding Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
M~+
1 hereby certify that copies of this OrdinancelResolution were posted in the
G#y of Dublin in accordance with Sect':on 731.25 of the Ohio Revised Code.
,l,~i~ 1,
,Cte f tounci{, Dublin. Ohio
EXH#8#T -
~ DELA
t- ( ~ P R
Z ~ r
~ j R1VrERA Y U
~ ~ ~NTR
U ~ . ~`~`°ECt
( z
(
( ~ ~Z
( z
t ~ tp
_.__..L_ ~ ~ ~
.Z P
i.-
J
; ~C
Z ~
~Q ~ ~
„ i Q~ GREENSQ'AY
(L iAOP
~ CASTLEFORBES ~ gl
De
_ Qp ( , Q ~~EN
( Q
SITE .
~d
(
i cur
i ~ F9 L
cL~"`4 ~
' ~
~ ' ~
o
j ~ i
i- ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ Z KQCnsoR p,
} - ~ ~ = trct~ c~ ~ ~i
- ~ i Q IdD~ ~ ~ KO
( ~ _
. w ~ a ~ CT.
' - H
( ~a ~ ~ ~i QQ`-'
- ( ;~O~YAL PLIJL(E ~ d 9R"
~ ;
( a M4 ~K
0 1000 2000 33 ( ~ ~ ~ v
~ '
SCALE IN f EET ~ ~ p P~ D ~oc~
~ ( ' n ..~ctt~r vc~tltiDJ~C~
1 IN EQUALS 1200 -
00-0062
~ 7 Rezoning Application
Bishop Parcel ~
Hyland-Croy Road iz~
` ~ FARIL.S~ /
! P(KKWY
EXHIBIT
Y
I
REZONING
EXPIRE
CI'T'Y OF DUBLI\
Ordinance No. ~ ~
5800 Shier Rings Road
Dublin; Ohio 43016 ~ ^ _
Phone~TDD:614/761-6550 City Council 1st Reading /s; "
w--:~ Fax: 614/761-6566 City Council Public Hearing
City Council Action
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
? Amount Received: Application~mNyo~ P&Z Date(s1: P&Z Action:
Receipt No: MIS Fee Ncc Data Received: ~ Received By:
79~~~
Tyne of Request
? PLEASE SUBMIT TVVO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS - P1,1~:1~I~ PRIG f -
ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION and
CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION
? Composite Plan(Ccda Section 153.053)
? Preliminary Develapment Plan (Code Section 153.C56)
? Other (Cescribe)
PROPERTY INFORP,1ATION _
TAx ID No/ ~ 147-00-00-006.00 Parcel size: 50.8± acres
DISTRICT PARCEL NO: (Acres)
Proi,~~rr, ads+.~~~ss: Hyland-Croy Road
I
Proi~~~~ty t_o~:ati<;~: East of Hyland-Croy Road
si,i~ of str~+et (N, s, . w) East side of Hyland-Croy Road ~
Nearest Intersection: Brand and Hyland-Croy
Di,t,jna~ from Nearest Intersrx ien: 2, 100 N, S, E, W from N ~ r f<ntersection ~
~ ~ -1
Exisun~l Land use/Deve~opmF~nt Agricultural purposes
t.
x° 'E 9 " "g
I 4.~ a
i~,~~l„-::,,,1 L.ina u::r;D~w~~~~~hm~~nt Single-family subdivision
R~v~~.rnrn1AI,I;Iu~,~Lrn FLA-1013 C~~h~O`?i:?8i39
EXHIBIT "B"
Current or Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: No. of Acres to be Rezoned:
U-1 (Jerome Twp:, pLR 50.8± acres
recently annexed)
STATEMENT:
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity.
The proposed rezoning mirrors the rezonings approved within the Westbury and Park Place
Subdivisions and furthers the guidelines established in the Community Plan. The site
plan shows street connections to the north and east as well as maintaining the setback
created on the Park Place site. The PLR district is appropriate for the area, as
single-family housing shown on the site meshes well with the metro park system
and existing subdivision.
~,.a
STATEMENT:
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan.
The proposed rezoning to the PLR district will follow the future land use plan adopted
in the Community Plan. The plan shows the east side of Hyland-Croy Road planned for
medium density of approximately 2 units to the acre. The street system will connect
with the Westbury Subdivision and Post Road. The proposed rezoning is certainly
within the parameters of the guidelines presented in the Community Plan.
PRE`JIOUS APPLICATION?
I Has an application for rezoning the prcperty been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES ? NO
IF YES, WHEN?
St~~te the basis of reconsideration:
I
.>.r
i
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COMPOSITE OR PRELIMINARY PLAN ATTACHED? YES ~I NO ? ,
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES ~
II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: v /
® 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEA ~~r
Ltx~,~I description of the property to be rezoned consists of _ 1 page(. C~~ p
PLAN REQUIREMENTS: ~ I
® 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24" X 36") SHOWING: p '
a. Tha silo and all land 500 (rat beyond the boundaries ~ A ~ ~ 2~J~
h. North arrow and her scale
c Existin~f condili<m:: (Ronda:, buildings, vtNletaticn.topo~fn3phy, Iurisdicli~m,~l boundaries, uldili 's, c~tc
d. Prolx~scacf User: (R~xlional transportation sysham, dunsilic~s, of dwullin~)s, buildin~'unit type , squ ~ < ~+t~ )
e. Existing :and proposed zoninrf district boundaries
Rrn;ninfApl~hc,ition PlA-f0f3 Date09/291g9
1'.rr~ ~4
EXHIBIT "B"
f. Size of the site in acres/square feet; and
g. All property lines, street rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries.
14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11" X 17")
~ 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/z" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20")
Showing contiguous property owners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned.
III. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS
Li t all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's
current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk.
PROPERTY OWNER
(not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE
r-,ta
See attached list Sty t8 T ~ `
I
I
I
~;...d
I
I~
_.m..k..__..._.._.._..__._~__...__._..
t- i
~1.. ur^i~Y ~ L:iuU
C~T'~ ~°~~~L6N
R~rzoning Application PLA-108 Data 09/28/99
I'.c.i. i „f c
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of current Property owner(s): Jon P. Riegle, Trustee-Deane Bishop & Suzanne B. Feasal C.R.U.
Mailing Address: 7751 Hyland Croy Road, Plain City, OH 43064
(Street, City, State, Zip Code)
Daytime Telephone: Fax:
Name of Contact Person', (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): Beri W. Hale, Jr.
'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below. Smith & Hale
Mailing Address: 37 Wes Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215
(Street, City. State, Zip Code)
Daytime Telephone: (614) 221-4255 Fax: (614) 221-4409
Which of the above is the primary contact person? Ben W. Hale, Jr. , or Jackson B. Reynolds III
V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY
Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City
representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application.
VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER
The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City cf Dublin and northwest
" Franklin County has stretchEd the Cit~ls capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said
faciiities available to the applicant until some future date. The ApplicanVOwner hereby acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin
Plannicg and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does net constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to
provult~ r>ssential services such as water end sewer facilities when nc~~dc'd by said Applicant.
VII. OWNER AUTHORIZA\nTION FOR REPR(E,SENQTATIV<E p~
I G~ ~ f,Jl~`-' ~ y /~J 3~ Z- , thy: own lic t uthorize
to act as my representawo and agent in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application rncluding moo i ying e projec , and I agree
to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent.
Signature of Current Property Owner. D r.~ ~"f ~5
fi
Signature of Current Property Owner: 6f3ate: _
i..: l~r~IV / ~'..,UU
VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT tf'' i ~ ~ ~ ~
6 1 4 9
R~voningAppliration PLA-1G8 Dato09/28/99
I'.u~c 3 „t
EXHIBIT "B"
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
I Jackson B . Reynolds III ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read
and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete
and in all respects true and correct, to he best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature of Applicant or Date:
Authorized Representative: C
~bscribed and sworn to before his day of ~v~i/~ ~
w.-m
Notary Public r
~~~PPP1~A(~h p~~~i
~`'y~ BETSY B. GAITERS
_ * t§ NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF OHIO
.,sTgr ~o``
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 15, 2002
~n~m~~O`
FIIE ~~P~
~ L~ I
.r
~ ` i
I ~~,.a < ,r1~n
~ uu
i..___._...~..__
~3wonirnf Apl~lir.atum P,ufn 5 of 5 PtA-108 09/28199
~ Q l~' ~
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Union, Township of Jerome Virginia Military Survey
3452, (all references refer to the records of the Recorder's Office, Union County, Ohio);
Beginning at an angle point in the existing City of Dublin corporation line, Ordinance No. 360-
98, of record in Franklin County Annexation Book 42, Page 626, said point being a northwesterly comer of
that 48.170 acre tract as conveyed to the Columbus Builder's Supply, Inc. of record in Deed Book 298,
Page 581, a northeasterly comer of that tract as conveyed to Jon P. Riegle Trustee for the Deane Bishop
and Suzanne Feasel Bishop CRUT Undivided Interest of record in Official Record 96, Page 767 and
Deane Bishop Trustee for the Leland Bishop Trust Undivided'/:Interest of record in Deed Book 229, Page
;i
49 ~I
thence South 20° 52" East, with said existing City of Dublin corporation line and with a westerly
line of said 48.170 acre tract, a distance of 975 feet to the northeasterly comer of that 32.33 acre tract as
conveyed to Johnston and Jeanne L Means of record in Deed Book 278, Page 714;
thence South 80° 52" West, with the northerly line of said 32.33 acre tract, a distance of 1987
feet to a point in the easterly right-of-way line of Hyland and Croy Road (County Road 2-D);
thence North 09° 38" West, with said easterly right-of-way line, a distance of ,1181 feet to a
point in the southerly line of that 30.501 acre tract as conveyed to Richard S. and Elaine E. Valentin of
record in Deed Book 288, Page 653;
thence North 80° 52" East, with said southerly line and the southerly line of that 29.299 acre
tract as conveyed to Sandra Wilson Smith et al of record in Official Record 37, Page 427, a distance of
1808 feet b the southeasterly comer thereof, in the westerly line of that 20.526 acre tract (15.918 acres as
per Union County Tax Map) as conveyed to Walter L. Starkey, being in an existing City of Dublin
corporation line, Ordinance No. 70-95;
thence South 06° 46" East, with said existing City. of Dublin corporation line .and with said
westerly line, a distance of 227 feet to the point of beginning and containing 50.8± acres of land, more or
less.
, EVANS, MECHWART, HAMBLETON & TILTON, INC.
c}
. _ 1 o ; y ler ~,.~p(o~
~ ~ , j ; isi'e urveyor No. 7211
• ~ .
i_---..-..~
~ n ~y~ (r
l,s~ J
• I JAN - 3 2C~.;0
GIB ~~LIN
t-E 113 ~3 ~ Z
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER(Sl
MlI Schottenstein Homes Deane Bishop Trustee
3 Easton Oval, Suite 540 7751 Hyland-Croy Road
Columbus, OH 43219 Plain City, OH 4306
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
James P. & Lillian S. Edwards James C. & Carolyn Mitchell Dorothy J. & David D. Blyth
LVES REM TO SURV 9267 Mitchell Dewitt Road 5580 Olentangy River Road
Mitchell Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 Columbus, OH 43235
Plain City, OH 43064
Arthur G. & Elizabeth L .Wesner Melvin & Annabel Centry
xC Associates An Ohio General Partnership JT LIVES REM TO SURV JT LIVES REM TO SURV
c/o Martin Luffy 7455 Hyland Croy Road 7525 Hyland Croy Road
5774 Finnegan Ct.
Dublin, ox 43017 Plain City, OH 43064 Plain City, OH 43064
Harold J. Jr. & Catherine J. McCarthy TGS POST LIMITED Lori L. Kinman
7895 Hyland Croy Road 7600 Industrial Parkway 6080 Post Road
Plain City, OH 43064 Plain City, OH 43064 Dublin, OH 43017
"~"'".C Land Development Corp. In Trust David F. Purdy Walter L. Starkey
O1 Hythe Court 7808 Industrial Parkway 6503 Cook Road
nlumbus, OH 43220 Plain City, OH 43064 Powell, OH 43065
James P. & Lillian S. Edwards Johnston H & Jeanne L. Means Columbus Buiders Supply Inc.
7041 Brand Road 7660 Hyland Croy Road Employee Profit Sharing Trust
Dublin, OH 43017 Plain City, OH 43064 Hyland Croy Road
Plain City, OH 43064
Richard S. & Elaine E. Valentin Sandra Wilson Smith et al
6707 Paul Road 7191 Mitchell-DeWitt Road
Westerville, OH 43081 Plain City, OH 43064
~ d ~
F Il. E 00P ~ „AN - 3 2000 ~ !
~--~p~
t- 3-00; 4: 17PM; Smith & Hale ;614 221 4409 # 3/ 3
~X~~ ~ B~ ~ g-~-I
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Jon P. Reigle, as the Trustee for the Deane Bishop and Suzanne B. Feasel C.R.U. T.
w~ one-half owner of the property included in the rezoning area, hereby grant to Ben W. Hale, Jr.
and/or Jackson B. Reynolds, III of the law firm of Smith & Hale, or their designee, the authority
to submit and pursue the rezoning to PLR for the 50.8+/- acres on the east side of Hyland-Croy
Road, and any other appropriate applications necessary to allow the proposed development of the
50.8+/- acre tract. The above-named attorney representatives have the authority to represent the
owners' interests in the subject property at all applicable hearings to insure the rezoning process
and any other administrative reviews are submitted and completed to allow the development of
the property as a single family housing subdivision.
~ ~~o o By: s
Date lgna
PILE COPY
a~~~odr~
reigle.mis
12/27/99 JAN 7 2u00
CITY OF DUBLIN
a _
To Nhom it May Concern:
1, Deane $ishop, ati the Trustee far tli~; i,eIand Bishcyp "'cyst o..e•haif oz.~ner ~~f trt~~
property included in the rezoning ar:.a, hereby gr~uit to IIen W. I-Ia1e, Jr. and~or Jackson 13.
ltevrx~lds, Iil of the iuw firm of Smith & Hale, ar their c:esignee, 1128 atitl'lority tCS submit acid
pursue the rezoning to PLR far the 50. S+; -acres on the east side of Ryland-Cro~~ Road, :tnd an}~
other appropriate applications necessary to ullo~v the proposed devej ailment of th$ St1.3j,'- acre
tract. The abe~~c-naar~ed attorney reprCSentatives hAVC the authartty to represent the owners'
interests in the subject property at a'l applicable Y+earings #o insure fhe rezoning pro;:ess end fury
other administrative reviews are s3bmitted and completed to allow the development of ire
property as a single. farnil~y housing subdivision.
_ D / - O ~ - O O 13y=~~~
Date Signature
~~L~ COPY
bishap.mis
1 z.~2~~~9
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
JAN 7 ~0~~0
C~~
.Z~Z
_ T00~ TgTounu?3 aiSaT~ C36GZ61fiT9 YF.~i TC~ST I~i)SV. D0; EG- TO
~
.
PARK Sp• ~ PATII SYSTEM
~ • CONNECTS WITH
SM(TH P ~ 'CAL AllJACF,NT PATH
=1.3 ~ Sl'STF,M
UN B?SHUP ARC'E1,
. , ' j--.~
O
~ f. ~ j J_ rr ~
4 ; ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ _
- T _ _
- ~ ,
OPE . - - ~EIQ SPACSr- ` ~ r ~ .
; ~i-5.1 -Z- - - -
.o
~Q
W ~ ~ .
O0 ~
0
O~~
4~ ~ 1
O:~•. -
~
~
O V
~ -
z Z
:4
'j'
'~,1 L k
M/I SCHOTTENSTEIN HOMES SUBDIVISION
PLANNED LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TEXT
BISHOP TRACT
HYLAND-CROY ROAD
1 /3/00
The following information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of Section
1181.02(b)(2) of the Dublin City Code and include a total of 51.6+/- acres which includes 9.1
acres of open space/park land within the site.
A. The proposed location and size of areas of residential use, indicating dwelling unit
densities, dwelling unit types, the total number of dwelling units for each density area and
the total number of dwelling units proposed in the development plan:
Gross acreage: 51.6 acres
Total units: 122 single family lots/houses
Gross density: 2.3 du/acre with park areas
Lot size: 70' x 130' with a minimum lot size of 9,100 square feet (minimum lot
width is 70; at the building setback line)
Setback from dedicated road right-of--way: 30' and 35'
Lot side yards: total lot 18' or more with a minimum of 6' on each side
(fireplaces, bay windows, air conditioners and eaves may encroach).
Lot rear yards: for main building it shall be 25% or more of the lot depth but not
to be more than 50' with a minimum of 25' (driveways, decks and patios
may encroach)
Maximum height: 3 5'
No-build zone: No-build zones shall remain free of any structures including, but
not limited to, drives and walks, buildings and outbuildings, sheds, fences,
(except adjacent to park ground) swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play
structures, satellite dish antennae, etc. Nothing herein shall prohibit
overlot grading and drainage facilities and utility lines and utility
structures within said no-build zones. The rear 20 feet of all lots within
the subdivision shall be covered by a no-build zone to keep those areas
free of obstructions and to preserve the existing tree rows.
No disturb zone: An area designated on a subdivision plat which shall remain free
of any structures including, but not limited to, drives, walks, buildings and
outbuildings, sheds, fences, swimming pools, decks, swing sets/play
structures, satellite dish antennae, basketball courts, etc. The existing
natural features shall not be disturbed, removed, or physically altered
unless written permission is granted by the Planning Director or designee.
Grading activities and placement or utilities within said zones are not
permitted unless written permission is granted by both the ^Planning
~i l~ ~`rJ ll U
1 ~ , ~
~ JAN - 3 2000
~i~°P 0~ DUBLIN
d:~~~
Director and the City Engineer or designees. Utilities may cross at right
angles to the said zones or run outside and parallel it.
B. The proposed size, location and use of nonresidential portions of the tract, including
usable open areas, parks, playgrounds, school sites and other areas and spaces with the
suggested ownership of such areas and spaces:
Park open space provided: 9.1~ acres (located within the subdivision)
Park open space required: 7.7~ acres
The 5.1 acre open space shown at the entrance to the subdivision off Hyland-Croy Road
shall be owned and maintained by the home owners association; additionally, the 1.8 acre
tract in the center of the subdivision and the 2.2 acre tract along the northern prperty line
abutting the Valentin property shall be the responsibility of the home owners association.
Location: See attached preliminary site plan. The open space locations shown on the
preliminary site plan are schematic and maybe adjusted to accommodate final
development.
Buffering and landscaping and a tree preservation plans shall be submitted as part of the
preliminary plat process.
A 200 foot scenic setback will be provided along Hyland-Croy Road in which street trees,
landscaping and an entry feature will be located.
Street trees shall be chosen from the City of Dublin approved street tree list and will
include the but not limited following two species and shall be placed 50 feet off center:
Green Ash, and Red Oak and these trees shall be planted so that only one variety is used
per street.
For any utility boxes located in the front or rear yards of homes within the subdivision,
the developer shall provide an evergreen shrub screen that will hide the boxes from view.
A 3-rail wooden fence (styled after that utilized in the Indian Run subdivision) shall be
erected along the western leg of the property, specifically along the Bishop properties.
C. The proposed provision of water, sanitary sewer and surface drainage facilities, including
engineering feasibility studies or other evidence of reasonableness:
Sanitary sewer and water shall be extended to the site from the current termini adjacent to
the proposed development area. Surface drainage shall be handled in conjunction with a
lake/retention basins within which will be constructed by the applicant with approval
from the City of Dublin. The stormwater drainage shall comply with all a licable w~
~Ii~
2 E 1L E COP ~
~~.pQ(o~, JAN - 3 2000
requirements in the Dublin Code, and a stormwater drainage plan will be submitted for
review prior to the preliminary plat.
D. The proposed traffic circulation patterns, including public and private streets, parking
areas, walks and other access ways, indicating their relationship to topography, existing
streets or showing other evidence of reasonableness:
See the attached preliminary site plan which shows the developer's attempt to tie this
proposal into the development to the east to connect the Westbury Subdivision to Hyland-
Croy Road. An additional connector will be made to the Valentin property to the north
for future development access. The internal street system collector will have aright-of-
way of 60' and pavement width(s) of 14' for each lane and cul-de-sacs will have aright-
of-way of 110' and a pavement width of as determined by the City of Dublin Engineering
staff except for those road right-of--ways identified on the site plan with 70' widths. The
developer shall dedicate an additional 10-foot wide strip along the Hyland-Croy Road to
meet the requirements of the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. Any intersection improvements
for Hyland-Croy Road will be coordinated with the City of Dublin Engineering staff. The
developer shall install a left turn lane from Hyland-Croy Road into the site and shall
install street lighting at the entryway intersection.
Four foot wide sidewalks will be installed on both sides of the streets within the
subdivision to provide for pedestrian traffic. An east-west sidewalk which will extend
through the subdivision from Hyland-Croy Road shall be five (5) feet wide. An eight (8)
foot wide bike path shall be installed along the east side of Hyland-Croy Road according
to the Area Plan.
A bike path shall be installed to provide access to the North Fork of the Indian Run
Creek, connecting to a bike path from Avery Park, to allow for an internal circulation
system between City parks.
E. The proposed schedule of site development; construction of structures and associated
facilities, including sketches and other materials indicating design principles and concepts
to be followed in site development, construction, landscaping and other features. Such
schedule shall include the proposed use of reuse of existing features such as topography,
structures, streets and easements.
Upon completion of the zoning and obtaining of all plat approvals, utilities will be
extended to the site. Construction shall commence thereafter to develop the subdivision
starting from the Westbury Subdivision area and working west. Construction may also
start at the Hyland-Croy Road access point and may move east for alink-up of the road
system in a later phase. The applicant shall prohibit the use of chain link, metal or plastic
fencing on any of the lots within this area through this zoning restriction and recorded _
deed restrictions. Any fencing installed upon any lot shall be a thr i ~p i - ai ~
L
a~~
3~ C O P y _ ~o~o , ~ 9
JAN 3 ~
O~-~~°~
CIT`~ ~~,!_~~I
_ _ ,......,.,,~.:n.,~~...
fence with a maximum height of 3.5 feet above finished grade with posts at
approximately 8 feet on center. The fence may be backed with black welded wire mesh
of 12.5 or 14 gauge wire. The specific details of the fence are shown on recorded plat of
Wyndham Village Section 1 on Plat 79, pages 101 and 102, Recorder's Office, Franklin
County, Ohio. No fencing shall be installed forward of the building line of any lot. The
developer shall provide either the above described fencing or suitable landscaping
between the lots and park/open space areas. Such fencing or landscaping shall be installed
on the lot.
Throughout the development (1) the same model with the same front elevation shall not
appear within two separate houses on the same side of the street; and (2) the same model
with the same front elevation shall not appear directly across the street or side by side to
the house directly across the street. Streets shall count as a lot when applying the above
formula. When the lot in question is a corner lot no lot at the same corner shall have the
same model with the same front elevation.
The exterior of all homes shall be constructed of all natural materials, brick, stone, wood,
stucco, and/or hardy plank. All homes shall have dimensional asphalt shingles. All
chimneys within the subdivision (either side or rear of the house) shall be constructed of
brick or masonry, and there shall be a plan to add to each elevation some architectural
features to those windows which also face the open space.
Ground signage will be located along Hyland-Croy and will be incorporated into a
landscaped entry feature at that location. The signage will be incorporated in the overall
landscape plan developed for those frontages. The signage, entry features, and entry
lighting shall meet the Dublin Zoning Code and lighting guidelines.
F. The relationship of the proposed development to existing and future land use in the
~ surrounding area, the street system, community facilities, services and other public
improvements.
The proposed site is located adjacent to the existing Westbury Subdivision on the east and
bounded to the west are the existing homes and farms located in Jerome Township, on the
north by the Smith and Valentin properties, and on the south by the Means and Griffin
properties which contains large-lot home sites.
G. Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the land to effectuate the proposed
development plan. Evidence of control includes property rights and the engineering
feasibility data which may be necessary.
The applicant has the property under contract to purchase and d
engineering firm of EMH&T to review the site. p
mibishop.txt
1 /3/00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ JAN - 3 2000
4 C~C~-~(o~" CITY OF Qw.~L____ I~
_ _ .m p~ ,
~~f~r i
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
Junc 15, 2000
~:rn (?F nl rl.l~
Division of Planning
.5800 Shier-Rings Road
r`Oublin, Ohio 43016-1236
Phone/iDD:614-161-6550
fox: 614-161-6566
Web Sile: www.dublin.oh.us
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
5. Rezoning Application 00-0062 -Bishop Crossing
Location: 51.6 acres located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road, approximately 700
feet south of Brand Road.
Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification).
Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: A subdivision with 113 lots with 7.25 acres of park.
Applicant: M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. 3 Easton Oval, Suite 540, Columbus, Ohio
43219; represented by Ben Hale, Jr., c/o Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725,
Columbus, Ohio 43215.
MOTION: To approve this rezoning application because the plan allows a significant parcel to
be added to the Metro Park, in conformance with the Community Plan, it provides connections
with surrounding subdivisions, Hyland-Croy Road, and the Metro Park, it preserves the
agricultural character along Hyland-Croy Road as recommended in the "Road to Wow!" draft
guidelines, the landscape detailing and commitments are exceptional, and the density conforms
~ to the maximum recommended by the Commission in connection with exceptional design
commitments, with 19 conditions:
1) That the text be revised to reflect a 70-foot right-of--way for Tullymore Drive and
36-foot pavement width, in conformance width the Thoroughfare Plan;
2) That the text be revised to reflect increases in lot sizes to match the plan
(minimum 80 feet lot width and 10,400 square-foot minimum lot size);
3) That the applicant pay the cost fora 12-inch water line along the length of
Hyland-Croy Road;
4) That the agricultural character landscape treatments be completely detailed at the
preliminary plat stage in conformance with the drafted guidelines, and that the
text be revised to reflect these commitments;
5) That a left turn stacking lane and street lighting be provided on Hyland-Croy
Road;
6) That the phasing of development begin from Hyland-Croy Road so that
construction traffic does not use existing neighborhood r UgMRTEQ ~ COUNCIL
~ d FOR MEETING ON ~ y D
Page I of 2
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OI' ACTION
June 15, 2000
5. Rezoning Application 00-0002 -Bishop Crossing (Continued)
7) That atot-lot be built in the adjacent 1.46-acre park (Park Place); and
,~..a,
8) That a substantial buffer be placed along the southern property line (Means),
subject to staff approval, to screen unknown land uses;
9) That a tree survey, tree replacement plan, and a tree preservation plan be
submitted at the time of preliminary plat as a basis for the utility/grading plans,
indicating trees to be removed, utility placement, grading and tree protection
methods, etc., subject to staff approval;
10) That 40 feet ofright-of--way be dedicated to be consistent with the Thoroughfare
Plan;
11) That the developer provide an analysis before preliminary plat demonstrating that
adequate water pressure and supply is available;
12) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with
current stormwater regulations, at the time of preliminary plat;
13) That a commitment for the design and operation of the shared retention ponds be
determined at the preliminary plat stage;
14) That the western loop access be moved farther away from Hyland-Croy Road at
the preliminary plat, subject to approval of the City Engineer;
15) That varied setbacks be determined at preliminary plat;
16) That an architectural matrix demonstrating diversity in housing styles be
submitted at preliminary plat;
17) That a bikepath/pedestrian path be provided at preliminary plat by easement or
land to connect the eastern loop road to the southern property (Means), subject to
staff approval;
18) That all utility boxes be placed in the rear, with landscape treatment to be
determined at preliminary plat; and
19) That a forced and funded homeowners' association maintain the setbacks and all
landscaping features within.
* Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 7-0.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a
positive recommendation.
STAFF CE ~ ICATION
yle =zell
Senior Pla r
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 18
CASE 5: Rezoning Application 00-0062 -Bishop Crossing
Location: 51.6 acres located on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road, approximately
700 feet south of Brand Road.
Existing Zoning: U-1, Rural District (Jerome Township classification).
Request: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: A subdivision with 113 lots with 7.25 acres of park.
Applicant: M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. 3 Easton Oval, Suite 540, Columbus, Ohio
43219; represented by Ben Hale, Jr., c/o Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite
725, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Staff Contact: Kyle Ezell, Senior Planner.
BACKGROUND:
This site is located in Union County and was annexed to the City in January of this year. It
continues to have a U-1, Rural District, township zoning. As part of an agreement with the
Bishop family, the Metro Parks Board is obligated to purchase a separate Bishop-owned tract of
134 acres. It is located across Hyland-Croy Road and the price is directly tied to the successful
rezoning of this site. In brief, the applicant will donate this large tract to Metro Parks at a
subsidized plan if and when this rezoning is approved. This 134-acre parcel along with the
Smith parcel (directly to the north) are planned as part of the comprehensive Metro Parks system.
Together they provide a Metro Park connection to the northern corridor of the Dublin parks
system.
The requested PLR District generally establishes the permissible uses and density, the proposed
development standards, size of park area(s), and the preliminary layout. In this case, 113 lots
with 7.25 acres of park are proposed. If approved, these will become binding upon the developer.
The Planning and Zoning Commission must make a recommendation on the rezoning request.
The application is then returned to City Council for the public hearing and vote. Atwo-thirds
vote of City Council is necessary to override a negative recommendation by the Commission.
The rezoning will become effective 30 days following Council approval. The development will
also be subject to the preliminary and final platting requirements at a later date.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Site Characteristics:
• The site is a very flat, rectangular property of approximately 52 acres. It has 1,150 feet of
frontage on the east side of Hyland-Croy Road and about 1,950 feet of depth. The site is
generally an open field used for cropland with tree rows outlining the perimeter.
• The site is bordered on the east by the narrow "tail section" of the proposed Park Place
subdivision and then Westbury. To the south is a 32.3-acre undeveloped property located in
Union County (Means). To the north is the southernmost parcel of the future Metro Park
(formerly Smith) and undeveloped "Valentin" property (not annexed into Dublin).
Immediately west, across Hyland-Croy Road, is the 134-acre tract owned by Bishop.
• The North Fork of Indian Run lies to the northeast in the proposed Metro Park, and this site
drains in that direction.
• The Jerome Township zone "U-1" permits agricultural and single-family uses. Several
subdivisions zoned Planned Low Density Residential are nearby, including Park Place,
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 19
Westbury, and Wyndham Village. The property to the north (Valentin) is expected to be
annexed followed by a PLR rezoning request.
Community Plan Issues:
• Hyland-Croy Road is the western limit of Dublin's exclusive annexation area. Dublin
cannot provide utilities beyond that point.
• The proposed Metro Park will provide "an edge" to the developed land mass around this side
of town. The Metro Park was one of the biggest and best ideas from the Community. Plan.
Due to the multi jurisdictional agreement signed at the inception of the park, the Metro. Park
land cannot be annexed to any municipality. Public utilities will not extend into/through it.
• The proposed "Road to Wow!" program designates this section of Hyland-Croy Road as
"agricultural character." The preliminary site plan shows a 200-foot setback as measured
from the Hyland-Croy right-of--way to the right-of--way of the frontage road. The text should
continue the standards for landscaping approved for Park Place (to the south).
• The applicant has provided a schematic for landscaping elements. The applicant has
committed to submit the appropriate details at preliminary plat.
• This development is voluntarily conforming to the proposed "Road to Wow!" program which
"caps" density at 2.2 units/acre in the 1-2 du/ac sections of Dublin as shown in the
Community Plan. Slight density bonuses are proposed to be directly tied to scenic roadway
and internal enhancements. The proposed density for this development is 2.2 units/acre.
• Several landscaping treatments that conform to the proposed Wow Element Design
Guidelines have been submitted. These include a linear "tall grass meadow" (about 35 feet
by 1000 feet), a substantial "woodland" (about three acres), asplit-rail fence (about 1200
linear feet), an "ornamental bosque" (32 trees), an "evergreen edge" (about 840 linear feet by
35 feet), a "naturalized retention pond" (with stone slabs for seating), and six substantial
ornamental tree massings along the bikepath. The overall application also includes a 134-
acre addition to the Metro Park, which is an enormous benefit, even if it is off-site. Staff
strongly believes that this type of development should be rewarded with the upper density
limit recommendation of 2.2 units/acre. The development text (proposing 2.3 units/acre)
needs to be revised to match the 2.2 units/acre shown on the site layout.
Park:
The Code requires a dedication of 7.25 acres of park based on 51.6 acres with 113 units. The
plan indicates exactly 7.25 acres of open space on site. Open spaces include a 2.15-acre
linear park on the northern boundary that connects with the Metro Park and approximately
5.5 acres of Hyland-Croy frontage. This development continues the linear park, which begins
at the Red Trabue Nature Reserve 4,500 feet to the southeast and ends at the Metro Park. It
should be noted that the northern edge park would not be acceptable as an independent park
parcel. It needs to be expanded northward, and this will need to be demonstrated at the time
of preliminary plat.
• There is no proposed bicycle/pedestrian access to the southern property (Means). Staff
recommends that a minimum 30-foot easement or linear park dedication connect the "eastern
loop street" to the southern property.
• Staff recommends the text be changed to include "saw-cut" concrete bikepaths along the
length of Tullymore Drive. Four-foot sidewalks will also be installed on both sides of all
streets except where there will be bikepaths. According to the text, a bikepath link will be
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 20
provided that enables access to the North Fork of Indian Run Creek. Staff recommends that
a bike path stub be shown on the preliminary plat to connect Tullymore Drive to the Metro
Park. A link is also needed to the proposed pond areas.
• The applicant has agreed to build a "tot-lot" on the adjacent 1.46-acre parkland in Park Place
and Westbury. The text should be revised to reflect this agreement.
Traffic Management and Street Design:
Primary access for the development will be from Hyland-Croy Road on the northwest corner
of the site. The east-west entrance road will complete Tullymore Drive. The development
includes several loop streets. A stub road is proposed to connect the' northern property
(Valentin), and the southern property (Means).
• To be consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan, staff recommends that 40 feet of right of way
be dedicated.
• Staff is requesting that the "western loop access" be moved further from Hyland-Croy Road.
This will be determined at the time of preliminary plat.
• City policy requires the developer to install a left turn stacking lane and street lighting at the
entry on Hyland-Croy Road. Lots will not be permitted to have direct access to Hyland-Croy
Road.
• The development text requires cul-de-sacs to have 110 feet of right-of--way. Streets, except
for the proposed Tullymore Road, will have 60 feet of right-of--way and 28 feet of pavement
from back-of--curb to back-of--curb. The right-of--way needs to fully accommodate seven-foot
tree lawns, plus sidewalks bike paths. These rights-of--way should include 30 and 35-foot
setbacks for lots fronting on a bikepath. Tullymore Drive must have a 70-foot right-of--way,
as called for in the Thoroughfare Plan. Staff recommends a 36-foot pavement width
measured back-to-back for Tullymore Drive. These issues will also be determined at the
time of the preliminary plat. The discussion here is intended to notify the developer of
several issues identified in this proposal.
Utility Provision:
• This site is within both the Indian Run and North Fork of Indian Run drainage sub-basins.
The site drains north and northeast. The majority of stormwater will be directed into two
proposed wet basins on the northern border with the Metro Park. The use of wet basins is
encouraged to improve the water quality of storm run-off and to provide aesthetic
opportunities.
• The applicant has agreed to engineer these ponds to service the proposed Valentin
subdivision to the north, the Metro Park, and this site. Details of stormwater design and for
the retention ponds must be completed based on the (future) approved preliminary plat and
prior to construction. Staff supports the applicants "master planning" effort for several sites
simultaneously.
• Eight-inch water lines will be available from Westbury and a 16-inch water main is located
on the south- side of Post Road. A looped water main is preferred. Staff requests that the
developer pay the cost of installing a 12-inch water line along the length of the Hyland-Croy
Road frontage.
• A 10-inch sewer line can be accessed from Westbury along Tullymore Drive. These lines
must be designed and extended by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 21
• Staff is requesting the applicant to provide a detailed analysis, similar to that of Park Place, to
demonstrate the availability of adequate water supply and pressure prior to approval of
preliminary plat.
• The text states that evergreen planting material will be used to screen utility boxes located in
front or rear yards. Staff recommends that all utility boxes be placed in rear yards.
Additional detailing is needed at preliminary plat.
Development Standards:
• The zoning text requires a minimum lot width of 70 feet and lot area of 9,100 square feet.
Since the text was written, the lots have increased both in width to a minimum of 80 feet, and
' a lot area minimum of 10,400 square feet. These dimensions match that of Westbury,
Wyndham, and Park Place. The text must be revised to reflect these changes.
• A staggered 30-35-foot front setback is required, and this should be determined at
preliminary plat. The text also requires a minimum 6=foot- side yard, a combined side yard of
18 feet, and a rear yard of 25 percent of the lot depth (25-50 feet). .The maximum building
height is 35 feet.
• Fences are limited to split rail of 3 %2 feet in height with optional black wire mesh. The text
prohibits fencing forward of the building line. Per Dublin's newly revised Fence Code,
fences are now permitted only within the buildable area of the lot, and this should be
indicated in the text.
• A 20-foot no-build zone is shown on the rear of all lots. The text should be revised to
include a 30-foot tree preservation zone along all treed areas. Construction should also begin
at Hyland-Croy Road working east, to minimize off-site construction traffic and should be
indicated on the preliminary plat, as recommended for other subdivisions.
Landscaping:
• A landscape plan, tree survey,- tree replacement plan, and tree preservation plan must be
provided at the preliminary plat stage. Green ash and red oak trees are proposed for street
trees, but a more diverse list of appropriate varieties should be added.
The southern undeveloped property (Means), is located in Union County. It is zoned U-I, but
the land use is unknown, and future uses could be non-compatible. An existing deciduous
tree row lines the southern property, but it is broken and not opaque. Staff recommends that
a substantial buffer be placed along the southern property to enhance he tree row and protect
future property owners. In addition, the preliminary plat should. indicate that an unknown
-land use exists on this property line and specify which properties will be affected.
• The northern property (Valentin), also with an unknown land. use, will be buffered by a link
to the Metro Park.
• Any proposed signs, entry features, and entry lighting must meet Code and the City's
Lighting Guidelines.
Architectural Diversity:
• Architectural standards are similar to Park Place and Westbury. Natural materials including
brick, stone, wood, stucco, and/or fiber cement siding (Hardiplank) are mandatory. Roofing
will be dimensional asphalt shingles. Chimneys require masonry or stucco stone.
. W.~, _
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 22
• Front house elevations cannot be repeated within two lots on the same side of the street, or
three lots across from it. Corner lots must also have different models and elevations. A
diversity matrix must be provided at preliminary plat.
• Each elevation that faces open space must conform to an architectural detailing plan. The
Commission has expressed concern about the house elevations that are visible from exterior
roads. This must be indicated in the text and verified at the preliminary plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The site adds a significant parcel to the Metro Parks system, provides access to Hyland-Croy
Road, and includes exemplary frontage treatments. Staff recommends approval with 18
conditions:
Conditions:
1) That the text be revised to reflect a 70-foot right-of--way for Tullymore Drive and
36-foot pavement width, in conformance width the Thoroughfare Plan;
2) That the text be revised to reflect increases in lot sizes to match the plan
(minimum 80 feet lot width and 10,400 square-foot minimum lot size);
3) That the applicant pay the cost fora 12-inch water line along the length of
Hyland-Croy Road;
4) That the agricultural character landscape treatments be completely detailed at the
preliminary plat stage in conformance with the drafted guidelines, and that the
text be revised to reflect these commitments;
5) That a left turn stacking lane and street lighting be provided on Hyland-Croy
Road;
6) That the phasing of development begin from Hyland-Croy -Road so that
construction traffic does not use existing neighborhood roads;
7) That atot-lot be built in the adjacent 1.46-acre park (Park Place); and
8) That a substantial buffer be placed along the southern property line (Means),
subject to staff approval, to screen unknown land uses;
9) That a tree survey, tree replacement plan, and a tree preservation plan be
submitted at the time of preliminary plat as a basis for the utility/grading plans,
indicating trees to be removed, utility placement, grading and tree protection
methods, etc., subject to staff approval;
10) That 40 feet of right-of--way be dedicated to be consistent with the Thoroughfare
Plan;
11) That the developer provide an analysis before preliminary plat demonstrating that
adequate water pressure and supply is available;
12) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with
current stormwater regulations, at the time of preliminary plat;
13) That a commitment for the design and operation of the shared retention ponds be
determined at the preliminary plat stage;
14) That the western loop access be moved farther away from Hyland-Croy Road at
the preliminary plat, subject to approval of the City Engineer;
15) That varied setbacks be determined at preliminary plat;
16) That an architectural matrix demonstrating diversity in housing styles be
submitted at preliminary plat;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -June 15, 2000
Page 23
17) That a bikepath/pedestrian path be provided at preliminary plat by easement or
land to connect the eastern loop road to the southern property (Means), subject to
staff approval; and
18) That all utility boxes be placed in the rear, with landscape treatment to be
determined at preliminary plat.
Bases:
1) The plan allows a significant parcel to be added to the Metro .Park, in
conformance with the Community Plan.
2) The plan provides connections with surrounding subdivisions, Hyland-Croy Road,
and the Metro Park.
3) The plan, as revised above, preserves the rural character along Hyland-Croy Road
as recommended in the "Road to Wow!" draft guidelines.
4) The landscape detailing and commitments are exceptional.
5) The density conforms to the maximum recommended by the.. Commission in
connection with exceptional design commitments.
~ _
't_~-~
-1 ~
PLR
R1
AY ~
r'^ , t
~J' r
` "°~y~~ ~ L
o ~~J
' y
o~ ~
SITE
R-'i
E~ ~
~ = a
t ~
4 ~fiCT+..
"~KY ` \
i 1
~ ~
~ wacoev c+R
wee.. \ Gt~~
~
~ t~
~ R-1
~
U- ` ~
~ i
f '
~
~ -
_ 00-0062
Rezoning
s~~~ Bishop Crossing
- ~ r
~ _
e
• ~ a
~aN
w~
~
YGT ~
- ~r
Y[,
~tiM y~qy,.~ ~OR p(. O0NO
_
CA5ILEF
N
' ROW
e~~ g z
m W
y
N
SITE ~
w¢ ~ N FNKF rT
W~ ~
yg .cnu ri
MpNPO ~ AVOCEIII
4 .
~,~p~ ~JAC.WA
f~`" C~
~sT ~ ~
` N~ysy4f+~~
T
~St d
WWOSOR ~ U
r ~ ~O
W'YOEM GR O
~ ~
W~~ J WOR
GT WAY
A ~ O~
RSV" WY1~~
Z KMCC ~~~Gbt
2
_ oR o FOR ~
A
y rn'Fll
m
ROYAL DL 7~ pe'
~Z W
.aGd
Y
a $
t~ `
P
~ oP
M w
U
~ ~ ND
C<
,p~ Q
~"H
~ r'~R F ~ ~~a~C
~ - ~ ~ Cod
u ~ 00-0062
D ~ Rezoning
~ ~ Bishop Crossing
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -June 15, 2000
Page 14
Mr. Lecklider favored this lication, although he was co cerned about future parking need .
He still was concerned out using Meijer's parking t because it would create an u afe
condition crossing M in Road. He said he was co ortable with the retention being He
would like to see trees preserved, but he was t a fan of silver maples. He agr d that this
site might not pport 300 plus inches of ad ' Tonal trees. Mr. Lecklider said e would vote
favorably if ' were taken to a vote.
Mr. ishman said he was in favo of a tabling, but the applicant ould be encouraged to
sage the site plan to save as ny trees as possible. He was not ' favor of this site plan.
Ms. Scholl agreed to table is application.
Ms. Boring asked t the standing seam roof be gray ' stead of white.
Ms. Boring ed if there would be a path fr the parking lot. Ms. Susong sa' there was an
existing epath along Dublin Center Dr' on the opposite side, a sidewal n Dublin Center
Drive the church side, and a sidew along Marcy Lane Ms. Clark aid the Community
P1 showed a proposed bikepath a ng the north side of Martin Road.
Mr. Eastep made a motion t able this application, and Mr. Pep seconded. The vote was as
follows: Ms. Boring, ye , Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague es; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Salay,
yes; Mr. Fishman, yes• nd Mr. Eastep, yes. (Tabled 7-0.)
The Commissi agreed to forego the 11 o'clock rul and hear the next case after a short recess..
A moti was made to approve the May 4 000 meeting minutes by Mr. Eastep, and Mr.
Fis an seconded. The vote was as folio Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague,
ye ; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; .Eastep, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes (Approved 7-0.)
5. Rezoning Application 00-0062 -Bishop Crossing
Kyle Ezell said this is a rezoning application for the PLR District on 51.6 acres located on the
east side of Hyland-Croy Road. It is located in Union County and was annexed into Dublin in
January of this year. It is zoned U-1, Rural District. He said this parcel and the Smith parcel
was a comprehensive segment of the Metro Parks program currently being implemented.
Mr. Ezell showed slides. The site is rectangular and extraordinarily flat. The North Fork of the
Indian Run runs along the northeastern side of this site. Hyland-Croy Road is the boundary for
Dublin's exclusive annexation area. The Smith parcel to the north will be part of Metro Parks.
The Means property, which is in Jerome Township, but not in Dublin, is located to the south.
Staff is recommending that opacity of a proper buffer area be achieved on this site because any
use could be developed on the Means site in the future.
Mr. Ezell said staff is excited about the frontage along Hyland-Croy Road using Road to Wow
elements. The 200-foot setback will be treated with an Agricultural character enhancement. The
Bishop property is continuing the linked open spaces with pedestrian and bikepath access from
the City of Dublin into the Metro Park.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -June 15, 2000
Page 15
Staff is requesting that additional easements be provided to the Means property to the south to
link the Park Place trail on the preliminary plat going north to meet with that. Utilities and sewer
will be continued east from Westbury. Staff recommends that a water pressure and availability
study be conducted at the time of the preliminary plat.
The detention ponds at the North Fork of the Indian Run are unusual because two developments
will share them with the Metro Parks. Staff requests that the ponds be in place prior to
development of this site.
Mr. Ezell said 35 feet by 1,000 feet of native tall grass meadows, athree-acre woodland, a 1,200
foot split rail fence, an a 840-foot evergreen edge were Wow elements proposed. Interior Wow
elements include an impressive naturalized pond.
He said the density was 2.2 du/ac. This proposal conforms to the Wow and Metro Parks Plans.
Staff feels that density is appropriate and recommends approval with 18 conditions:
1) That the text be revised to reflect a 70-foot right-of--way for Tullymore Drive and 36-foot
pavement width, in conformance width the Thoroughfare Plan;
2) That the text be revised to reflect increases in lot sizes to match the plan (minimum 80 feet
lot width and 10,400 square-foot minimum lot size);
3) That the applicant pay the cost fora 12-inch water line along the length of Hyland-Croy
Road;
4) That the agricultural character landscape treatments be completely detailed at the preliminary
plat stage in conformance with the drafted guidelines, and that the text be revised to reflect
these commitments;
5) That a left turn stacking lane and street lighting be provided on Hyland-Croy Road;
6) That the phasing of development begin from Hyland-Croy Road so that construction traffic
does not use existing neighborhood roads;
7) That atot-lot be built in the adjacent 1.46-acre park (Park Place);
8) That a substantial buffer be placed along the southern property line (Means), subject to staff
approval, to screen unknown land uses;
9) That a tree survey, tree replacement plan, and a tree preservation plan be submitted at the
time of preliminary plat as a basis for the utility/grading plans, indicating trees to be
removed, utility placement, grading and tree protection methods, etc., subject to staff
approval;
10) That 40 feet ofright-of--way be dedicated to be consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan;
11) That the developer provide an analysis before preliminary plat demonstrating that adequate
water pressure and supply is available;
12) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with current
stormwater regulations, at the time of preliminary plat;
13) That a commitment for the design and operation of the shared retention ponds be determined
at the preliminary plat stage;
14) That the western loop access be moved farther away from Hyland-Croy Road at the
preliminary plat, subject to approval of the City Engineer;
15) That varied setbacks be determined at preliminary plat;
16) That an architectural matrix demonstrating diversity in housing styles be submitted at
preliminary plat;
17) That a bikepath/pedestrian path be provided at preliminary plat by easement or land to
connect the eastern loop road to the southern property (Means), subject to staff approval; and
__s_-. .
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -June 15, 2000
Page 16
18) That all utility boxes be placed in the rear, with landscape treatment to be determined at
preliminary plat.
Mr. Peplow said he agreed that the inclusion of the 134-acre Metro Park and the Wow features
along Hyland-Croy Road made the density acceptable. However, he did not think the program
allows the inclusion of external sites to be added. Mr. Ezell agreed. Mr: Peplow asked if the
"Wowculator" worked for this. Mr. Ezell said it went over the top with the Metro Parks site. He
said it was an example of "create your own Wow!'. Mr. Peplow said it looked good.
Mr. Peplow asked where was the western loop access to be. Mr. Ezell said it was requested by
the engineering staff to push the access of the western loop up through the middle road instead of
the access. Mr. Lecklider asked if it would align with the parcel to the north.
Mr. Hammersmith said since Tullymore was going to be a major route through Westbury all the
way from Avery, staff would like to get as much stacking and clearance as possible. He did not
think it would affect the lot count, although the lots would need to be repositioned.
Ms. Salay said she had a problem with the openspace being considered parkland. Other than this
openspace, the site has no parkland. Mr. Ezell said staff had a proposal in the office for 2.3
du/ac with a park, but when the density dropped to 2.2 du/ac the lots got bigger and the park
disappeared. He said they have agreed to provide a tot lot off-site, bordering the site.
Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, said the tot lot will look like a part of the Metro
Parks system. He said they will equip the tot lot, subject to staff approval, and they would bring
in the plans at the preliminary plat.
Mr. Ezell said staff is recommending a bikepath easement or land be provided to access this
property, and the applicant has agreed. Ms. Salay asked if the bikepath would be installed prior
to the sale of lots. Mr. Eastep said they would be completed with the street construction. Ms.
Clarke said there is an engineering inspector that ensures the bikepath is installed prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
Ms. Salay said she understood that the split rail fence was a Wow! element and she assumed it
would run along the entire frontage of the property. She asked if fences were disliked, because
she believes it would block the view. Mr. Eastep said split rail fences were considered part of
the historic character and in keeping with recent developments, and public space will be
separated from residential space by demarcation with the less intrusive fence.
Mr. Fishman asked who would maintain the fence. Mr. Hale said the developer would complete
the improvements, but it would be transferred to the City. Mr. Ezell said at the preliminary plat
stage, it will be affirmed that a forced homeowners' association would maintain the fence.
Ms. Boring asked how many Wow points this received on the Wowculator. Mr. Ezell said it
exceeded 2.2 du/ac.
Ms. Boring asked if the bikepaths would be constructed before building permits were issued.
Mr. Ezell said it would be addressed during the preliminary plat stage. Mr. Hale agreed that the
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -June 15, 2000
Page 17
fence and bikepaths would be done, but the landscaping could not be completed until the
planting season.
Mr. Fishman asked Mr. Hale to commit to having forced and funded homeowners' association
maintain the 200-foot setback including the fence, similar to that in the subdivision to the south.
Mr. Hale agreed.
Mr. Lecklider asked if the Metro Parks would install fences around their boundaries to restrict
access. Mr. Ezell said the Metro Park dips into the subdivision actually touching many lots. He
said staff would not allow chain link fences to be installed.
Stephen Caplinger, M/I Homes said the Metro Parks new concept was to start linking the parks
with trail systems, totally open, opposite of what had been done in the past.
Mr. Hale said materials used for this project will be all natural, plus Hardiplank.
Mr. Lecklider asked if the waterline issue had been resolved. Mr. Ezell said the pressure issue
had not been resolved yet.
Mr. Hammersmith said the Engineering department was in the process of updating the water
distribution model and this will be a consideration in the update.
Mr. Lecklider asked if it was agreed that construction would begin from Hyland-Croy Road. Mr.
Hale said yes.
Mr. Ezell said the bikepaths were to be saw-cut.
Mr. Hammersmith said the front yard utility boxes in Hawk's Nest and Westbury 4, will not be
repeated in future subdivision according to Ohio Edison.
Mr. Eastep said he loved the Wow elements. He congratulated staff for their work on this
project. Mr. Sprague agreed. Mr. Fishman said the efforts made were commendable. Mr.
Lecklider said the staff report for this case was a pleasure to read. He gave credit to M/I and Mr.
Hale for their influence.
Mr. Fishman made a motion to approve this rezoning application, because the plan allows a
significant parcel to be added to the Metro Park, in conformance with the Community Plan, it
provides connections with surrounding subdivisions, Hyland-Croy Road, and the Metro Park, it
preserves the agricultural character along Hyland-Croy Road as recommended in the "Road to
Wow!" draft guidelines, the landscape detailing and commitments are exceptional, and the
density conforms to the maximum recommended by the Commission in connection with
exceptional design commitments, with 19 conditions:
1) That the text be revised to reflect a 70-foot right-of--way for Tullymore Drive and 36-foot
pavement width, in conformance width the Thoroughfare Plan;
2) That the text be revised to reflect increases in lot sizes to match the plan (minimum 80 feet
lot width and 10,400 square-foot minimum lot size);
3) That the applicant pay the cost fora 12-inch water line along the length of Hyland-Croy
Road;
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -June 15, 2000
Page 18
4) That the agricultural character landscape treatments be completely detailed at the
preliminary plat stage in conformance with the drafted guidelines, and that the text be
revised to reflect these commitments;
5) That a left turn stacking lane and street lighting be provided on Hyland-Croy Road;
6) That the phasing of development begin from Hyland-Croy Road so that construction traffic
does not use existing neighborhood roads;
7) - That a tot-lot be built in the adjacent 1.46-acre park (Park Place);
8) That a substantial buffer be placed along the southern property line (Means), to screen
unknown land uses, subject to staff approval;
9) That a tree survey, tree replacement plan, and a tree preservation plan be submitted at the
time of preliminary plat as a basis for the utility/grading plans, indicating trees to be
removed, utility placement, grading and tree protection methods, etc., subject to staff
approval;
10) That 40 feet ofright-of--way be dedicated to be consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan;
11) That the developer provide an analysis before preliminary plat demonstrating that adequate
water pressure and supply is available;
12) That the applicant provide details of the stormwater design, in accordance with current
Stormwater Regulations, at the time of preliminary plat;
13) That a commitment for the design and operation of the shared retention ponds be
determined at the preliminary plat stage;
14) That the western loop access be moved farther away from Hyland-Croy Road at the
preliminary plat, subject to approval of the City Engineer;
15) That varied setbacks be determined at preliminary plat;
16) That an architectural matrix demonstrating diversity in housing styles be submitted at
preliminary plat;
17) That a bikepath/pedestrian path be provided at preliminary plat by easement or land to
connect the eastern loop road to the southern property (Means), subject to staff approval;
18) That all utility boxes be placed in the rear, with landscape treatment to be determined at
preliminary plat; and
19) That a forced and funded homeowners' association maintain the setbacks and all
landscaping features within.
Mr. Hale agreed to the above conditions.
Ms. Boring seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Lecklider,
yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Fishman, yes.
(Approved 7-0.)
The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
ibby F rley
Administrative Secretary
V aK. ~7
~MNNN ~4~ CT)
~ L.L..
r. _
d
~ U
ww
xa •
UU
Qd
AA
A ~ ~ •
,
.
;
~ ~ ;
> ;
0 0'
a. c~ ~ _
H Q
wwvl
~i F- U U z . ~ ~ ' ' ' W ai +r&r, a l:urw= k 'rw.
WZ w ;
A d Q i ~ ~ ~ i (,3 f~iE erYr Ili )21n
~Aaa.A ~c
W QOvl~n~ gip, r:<
~ F., O a a. x ~ ~ r~ Y ~ , E
V~ v~.a0007 ~ ~
w~Z1 -~~r ~0S~ as *
ilNit)~•F t'Jt7N1"Y i,~`> ~ rJ zrUB tCS~'a!~~yrri~ i t K'.
~j;.} a ~ ~,..rt~~+ z ~ _
~ i' F ~ ~ ~ ..:t 1
•
• t
mFUU 47m il,Uxht,4jtw i `
t
dzo
J yr .Tp W
j'.(Tl h .I 9 ~ T
t+1, x.. r ~~C'. , R a W ~ ~ ~ ~~'~d.q. M
• y:} •a uw i ~ ~
a A ~ - ~ w ~ w ~ x~~~~~~
r O ~ ~
•
,
4 a • r ,
r •
o~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ - ,
. .
~
~4 t H ~ ~ ;
~ ~
.T
.•.;.:•o
tV.~11V A4~ .}y W
_ , a _
•
fi,.
r s O(J:
G ,~'k.`~a-1'~ C .
•M1.'.:.
y ~
. i,
. ~ . .
o.. .
,
• - CROP ROAD ~
.
1.~3 .ac. "
I : • • ' .
. .
I::.:.:.. ~ ~ ~ . , .
. ,
~ yam'
X61
' / v~E
I i ,
• ~'I" ~ •
I , ~
~
'
•
I/ / • •
w=
.
a_ ~ YYN
_ ~
4
LJ Qo
zT~~~'T7~' ~?Q JNt133VY lIQ~I 0 Q ~ ~
'11/4a~\_'~if~4:~ Ul ~03J,11WSt~S ~ 1 _ i , ~ O
i ' "
cs- QI
~r~ ~
~I I~ ~ ~ -
INS r ~ bl a~ ~ ~ ti
~ r~ 7;' f kII~IV, u" n~,,.,~~ ~ 3 ? t ~ ~ ,
yl i ~ ~ i
I ro ~
ti"•~'` Qj ti?i~n ~°s ? il7b,~~~ r I`I; ~~~Ies ~ ~~~T o ~ ~
~ ~ i
r
~ ~ sd ~ ~ rI w - ~ //,i~ j~1
~ ~ ~dq ti y ~ rygp~ I I v : -a ~ , t' 1
.f 7 'l4 ~Y ~.I W I ~
i V tqy ~P ra aF~
4 a p ~ A `
/ ^
~ ~ ~ I
~ p P ni a ~ Y i~~w ~~~x~ 41
~ ~ n ~ I N
i d U ~ I ~ r d~ n,.- 1 ~ i -
u ~ 1J ~ k 4'~~ I
.
y ~ ~ ,~~i, ~ .pd ~ ~ ~~J+ ~ ~ ~kr~ f~a i Err 1 i ~ J" ~ p ~ ~
~ 1 3 r ~ , ~
~ ~u~ t ~ anJ ,a a °y+~~'~ ro ~
~ ~ ~ ~
<
i~'ul,i ~ ~'S ~ a ~ ~ F,
o<'
~ ` ~ ~ 1 ~
Gu =O S r ` hM~ S Y
.'r ~ ~ ~ S jam-. -f .~.._z ~k~: ~ 7 ~ ~ 1, ' ~ , L
7~ o o u' it ~;'i~"~ ~ r' F ~ ~ QJ
~p ~ I F
~.xr aonri 'I 'i't^-~~ ~~F~h'1 ~y~,rR ~ ~
I ~ _ t. - ~
~ ~ _ e'~ any, ~ OY 9~ 1
~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ U Ir (r O
' yv ;{X ~pp, t a.'fi c
V ~ k , , k~,,.
i m a. 4~ _ rl
r
3° 3 P
v
-o
1
a~ ~
v q r~
-6 F ,
1 I +I
. r a~J I ~,p;,,, ~
~ i ~Y ~
u I,
J, w ~ w
j Y
Q,
a~
N
~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ . t t ~''i~ I y' ~ of
~ w
~ ~
t 01 I a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ r~
`
i ~ ~ U
H ,,ti t~ynim ~ e~drt ~ ~r. _ ~
`
~fi ~
I i Li
\'•V: F~ II ~I
_ _ ~ . ' ~
~
P'~ ~
f - ~
~ t ' a J, - _ _ ` jI o - ' 0.3
_ ~ ~ e ~@r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
M e 'I
~ ~ ~ .....,r,.. ~ ~ ~ ` w I o ~ ~ I ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
Q ~
~ e~~
~ ~ ~ ~
o ~ ~ ~ ~
_
7~._
z., 1 6 - - - -
t
t
~ . ^r^'. -
Q ~
.
I
w f
r ~
l ~
l
~ _
~
. C O 7 r mxxn
~ , i ~
_ _'_..___i~f
~ ~
~ ~ 4 . -
M , ' win ~
~ ~ f' ~ I~
~n v
. .
r^ ....y. r.=-... c, .,vwrsc•__ r _:.._ex+_ ::m:..a=+e~ 'a..ms. iw.. w....~~~ ~~s.....l;y
y ~ _ v
y,(~A-r~J 2~ G r o
~ $ ~ ~ o
~
.
~.r "a .fir t > /1~-b'''~ ~-r C"r 7 Q
~ ~.ti b b a ~ ._a,.. <
~I
~
~
~ ~
i. " .
~ V'. ~ .
`9`
? ~ ~ ~ I
. .
~ .~~y. "
. ~:.i ~ :<a
" i 'i
I
~
•.~o'• 0 08 ° off''" Io:..
~
-
A~
M
~ aY t'qt .
_ Z .....u ~ 1.
_ ::.:i y7
K r` d0
_ nPr ~
HSI
j
cc 1
` ` /
~ N ~ N r'
W
p 'z h t`. A y ~v
. ^ a
F aO ~'y'`
c _ may, F ~r C'7 f!- X ~A _ _ Y ~p
m
~ ~ 1
t
~ C nF' ~ 5 f x
4 r,e~ ~n.,w.y.(M f~15M1ti J t F1iM ~t
y
~ t ~ A.INOQ:)NDINf!
u _ _ _ _ ~
ar' .~t r ~ .;r ~QPir^l~.b!'r".~;F ~ _ _ ^^LNf10D N1'IN.NYbd
a
r F~t'"'~ f . ~ n`r(1 ~ P'f td :a 'v v O ` r-1
~r~~ ~ rt " ~y Omm--~~ H
r~ ..~'r - ~ c~ rnzz
~ y
r
~ .
` ~
~,~r,s4i . ~
o z
- ,
~
_ . . , ~ d
mm
ov
~ as
a z
m m
n O G~,7 jjp L v ~
G c ~
O p ~
~ ~
-n ~ rid'
~ cn o rt Ni N~~:.N~
C .~~i N N N W O~
U ~ UI (A
z ~v fii c
~
Q^' s ~ _ a
~J '?c~ -F r,
ENTi¢ ~
O GlIOOOG~/o Fi'QOiV Ti4CsE oftc•~/~4~5p~
f ME.4ao W
~ ~
T ~
~ ~~rn
~
~ ,lam ~ ~ a n~-~,( ~
,
, .
_ ~ )b
I
f ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~a ~ ~ ~
J ~ Z cep
~ ~
g~~ b
O j.s ~ ~f
r Z~
j J
.r~~ j l .
rn
~ v,v,~n~ -
Qo v o 8 ~ _ - °_1 ~i*
~r _
A A m i
~ sr~ w'aTo'~
~I'~--
~ ~ ~ ~ P~`
f
r? - V ~I
o ~ - ~ ~
3 ~
r, ~
~ a
,c
- w
l N
A
a
3
~ A n
a o
o F
f
s
}1 s i
O h0. A ._C ~ ~
O j.`
a `,pp
~ e
W
a
t T
o
~ n
r~ ~ 9
~
~
ea Z ~ y~a g o
\ w
N ~ l
L A
!I a ~
n
o ~~~ttt
~ ~ ~
a a
ma s ~ _C p. 2. E
r
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A
'~a ~ 1 ~ ~ x 5 ~
C7 w
L
/~t N l~
~ Y~ `
~ Csz ~ 1i
0 0 J ~a
a ~ <n o
C ~J
r-- ~