HomeMy WebLinkAbout77-98 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co.
Ordinance No.__
AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING A TEMPORARY REZONING
MORATORIUM IN THE SOUTHWEST AREA OF THE CITY, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
,..,.~
WHEREAS, the area of the City located generally south of S.R. 33 and west of I-270,
more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" is experiencing increasing development
pressures; and
WHEREAS, the recently adopted Community Plan anticipated development of this area
at a significantly slower pace; and
WHEREAS, the infrastructure improvements needed for development of the Southwest
Area will have major fiscal impacts on the City's capital improvements budget; and
WHEREAS, in view of the multi jurisdictional issues for this area in regard to school
district boundaries and roadways, Council has directed staff to re-examine the annexation
policy contained in the Community Plan; and
WHEREAS, Council finds it necessary to impose a temporary zoning moratorium in this
area to allow for the update of this portion of the Community Plan to ensure compatible
growth and development in the Southwest Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, ~_ of the elected members concurring that:
Section 1. City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall not formally act
upon any rezoning applications for land located within the Southwest Area of the City for
a period of six months from the effective date of this ordinance, or until the
aforementioned issues have been addressed by staff to the satisfaction of Council.
Section 2. Due to the nature and complexity of the issues raised, Council may, by
resolution, extend the rezoning moratorium for an additiona190 days if deemed necessary.
Section 3. This moratorium shall not apply to any complete rezoning application which
was properly submitted to the City for approval prior to the effective date of this
ordinance.
Section 4. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency necessary for the immediate
preservation of the public health, safety and welfare, and for the further reason that the
development issues specific to the Southwest Area need to be addressed immediately to
ensure compatible growth and development in the Southwest Area. This ordinance shall
therefore be effective upon passage.
Passed ~ day of , 1998.
~ ~
- YresTdint? O
Attest:
Form No. 30043
Passed--- -- -- - --- - - -- - -- -- -19
I hereby certify that copies of this Ordinance/
City of Dublin in occardance with Section 731.25 op~;orRevised lode.
Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
Clerk of Council
Division of Planning
5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236
CITY OF DUBLIPI Phone: 614-761-6550 • Fax: 614-761-6566
~~ ~-
To: Richazd Helwig, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development
From: Barbara M. Clazkanning Director
~ Date: July 2, 1998
Re: Southwest Rezoning Moratorium -Ordinance 77-98
.~.
Memo
„~,,, City Council has proposed a temporary hold on new rezoning applications in
the Southwest Area, pending prepazation of a new area plan. There are
several issues which I would like to raise in response to this.
• Given the general length of time to process a rezoning application, asix-
month suspension period should not cause unacceptable levels of delay.
Six months should also be adequate to undertake an area study. Within
that period, the major study conclusions should be appazent, even if it is
not fully complete or adopted.
• Within the area, there is one rezoning application currently in process.
It has been "on hold" at the applicant's request for neazly six months.
• There are two approved PUD concept plans which have not yet proceeded
to the rezoning phase. These would be stalled.
• The staff has not been informed of any rezoning applications within the
area which are to be filed in the immediate future.
• Some of the zoning in the Southwest Area is LI, RI, and G.I. These
industrial zones have woefully inadequate development standazds and
permit a wide range of objectionable uses. Occasionally, an application
is filed to change the industrial district to a more acceptable zone (for
example, the recent Duke application). This might forestall a zoning
improvement.
• The Assistant Law Director recently advised staff to process zoning of
several parcels in the Southwest Area. These aze annexed pazcels which
still cazry Washington Township zoning. These can be prepazed for
processing at the end of the moratorium period rather than during it. This
should still accomplish the goal.
• There is at least one right-of--way acquisition in the Southwest Area in
which the property owner has indicated an interest intent in commercial
rezoning as a pazt of the settlement. This too, would be postponed.
In brief, there may be occasional problems raised by the proposed
moratorium. The anticipated problems aze expected to be manageal~lg.
SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL
BMC/laf ~ °~ 8 F0~ ~-7L~~P/iUC~~.c'~.'y 6
...
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
130-98 - -------19--------
Ordinance No.------~---------------- Passed----------------------------------------- -
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE TEMPORARY ZONING
MORATORIUM IN THE SOUTHWEST AREA OF THE
CITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, Dublin City Council enacted emergency Ordinance 77-98 on the 6`h day of
July, 1998 implementing a temporary rezoning moratorium in the Southwest Area for a six
(6) month period; and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned ordinance, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein, described the Southwest Area of the City as the area located generally
south of- S-.R: 33 and west of I-270, as an area experiencing increasing development
pressures; and
WHEREAS, during this six (6) month period, Staff and Council's Community
Development Committee have interviewed and retained a consultant to prepare a
Southwest Area Study which is the first in a two step process to fully develop a revised
plan for this area; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Committee met on November 9, 1998 to
review a proposal submitted by Wallace Roberts & Todd to serve as urban planning and
design consultants for the Southwest Area Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Committee recommended that the temporary
rezoning moratorium in the Southwest Area be extended for an additional six (6) month
period and that the aforementioned consultants be retained to finalize the planning process;
and
WHEREAS, Staff has recommended that four development proposals which entered the
rezoning process prior to the implementation of the temporary moratorium, be exempted
from this moratorium extension in order that they may proceed with development; and
WHEREAS, for all the reasons set forth above, and for the reasons set forth in Ordinance
77-98, Council finds it necessary to extend the temporary rezoning moratorium in the
Southwest Area to enable the planning process to continue to insure compatible growth and
development within the Southwest Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by Council of the City of Dublin, State of
Ohio, ~ of the elected members concurring that:
Section l . The temporary rezoning moratorium as set forth in Ordinance 77-98 is hereby
extended for an additional six (6) months through July 5, 1999.
Section 2. Except as set forth in Section 3 herein, during this extended moratorium period,
City Council and the Planning Commission shall not formally act upon any rezoning
applications for land located within the Southwest Area of the City unless the
aforementioned issues have been addressed by Staff to the satisfaction of Council.
Section 3. The following parcels/developments shall be exempt from the terms and
provisions of this moratorium;
Young Tract, Eiterman Road; Rezoning Application 97-0972;
Windmiller Parcel, Wilcox Road; Rezoning Application 97-0332;
Trees Tract, Avery Road; approved Concept Plan 97-035Cp;
Avery Village Commons, Avery Road; approved Concept Plan.
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No._______..________________ Passed__
Page two
Section 4. This moratorium shall not apply to any complete rezoning applications which
were properly submitted to the City for approval prior to the effective date of Ordinance
~"""' 77-98.
i
~""" ~~. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency for the immediate preservation
of the public health, safety and welfare,and due to the fact that development issues specific
to the Southwest Plan are currently being addressed in order to preserve the character and
nature of that section of the City of Dublin, and to meet the goals of the Community Plan.
Passed this- day of 199~.~
Officer
ATTEST:
Clerk of Council
1 rere!,~ rsrtif~~ thn; codes of this Or:f-nance~~esnlution were posted in the
City et D}blip in acco~-.'~n~e wad Section 131.25 of the dhio Revised Code.
it
~}s~ Cler f Council, Dublin, Ohio
.,
i
S:\D.4TA\COLJNC[L\ORD[NANC\STH WST.MOR
~.. >: Steve Smith
From: Kim Littleton
Subject: Projects Potentially Exempted From Southwest Area Moratorium
Date: November 20, 1998
Young Tract, Eitermau Road; 97-0972 (Rezoning application filed, pre-moratorium)
The request is to rezone the parcel from R-113 (Washington Township) to PIP, Planned Industrial Park. After
postponing the case in August of 1997, the case was later tabled by the Commission on December 11, 1997. The
application remains on file and "on hold" at the applicant's request.
Windmiller Parcel, Wilcox Road; 97-0332 (Rezoning application filed pre-moratorium)
This site was rezoned PCD, Planned Commerce District in 1990 as a larger mixed use plan. An updating of the
Thoroughfare Plan forced several changes to the approved PCD. Staff encouraged the applicant to file a plan
revision because the old plan was not compatible with the new rights-of--way. The proposal was tabled at the
October 3, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and referred to a subcommittee. The subcommittee met
~n October 12 and October 27, 1998. Mr. McCash offered to bring the matter up with Council at its next meeting.
. rees Tract, Avery Road; 97-035CI' (Approved concept plan)
""A concept plan was approved for this property by Council on June 23, 1997. This requires rezoning to PUD,
Planned Unit Development to permit an office or day-care use and 11, two-family dwellings. Mo Dion of the
Stonehenge Company has approached the City regarding exemption from any extension of the moratorium.
Approval of the concept plan is non-binding. It expires after 180 days if a preliminary development plan has not
been filed, but this time limit has never been enforced by Dublin.
Avery Village Commons, Avery Road; (Approved concept plan)
A concept plan was approved for this property by Council in 1996. The request was to rezone the parcel to PUD,
Planned Unit Development to permit amulti-family residential development. Approval of the concept plan is
non-binding, and it expires after 180 days if a preliminary development plan has not been filed. Again, Dublin has
never enforced this time limit. A rezoning application (preliminary development plan) was filed on October, 1997 tc
rezone the property to PUD to permit a combined multi-family and single-family development (it was different from
the concept plan). The Planning and Zoning Conunission recommended disapproval of the application in March of
1998 and Council voted to disapprove; the application in May of that year.
Swicard Property, Avery and Woerner Temple Roads; 98-1182 (New rezoning application)
This application was filed on October 30, 1998 during the current moratorium. The request is to rezone the property
to PCD, Planned Commerce District to permit a neighborhood retail development. The applicant has been informed
,,,~„ that the application will be deferred until the moratorium expires.
'ending Plats/Permits
There are a number of other projects that received zoning approval prior to the moratorium that leave either received
plat approval or are in various phases of construction. These projects were exempted under the previous
moratorium, and these are not listed. Staff assumes a moratorium extension is not intended to apply to zoned land.
Division of Planning
5800 Shier-Rings Road • Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236
Phone: 614-761-6550 • Fax: 614-761-6566
i
CITY OF DUBLIN ~ /(A ~ O
To: Dublin City Council Members
)EYom: Tim Hansley, City Manager
Initiated By: Rick Helwig~,A~s~si~stant City Manager ~ it of of Development
Bobbie Clarke;'~irector of Planning
Date: September 1, 1998
Update: Southwest Area Study
After interviewing two national firms to prepare the Southwest Area Study, Wallace, Roberts
and Todd was selected. The Wallace, Roberts and Todd study team includes Duncan Associates
(development standazds specialists), Eric Damian Kelly (land use law) and Randall G.Arendt
(land conservation /open space). This team seemed to be much stronger in its ability to give
us solid legal advice and a framework to proceed. The success of the Southwest Area Study
depends upon Dublin's ability to vupl~u~nt its vision for that area. 'Implementation is expected
to involve adoption of new growth management tools (for example, ordinances on adequate
... ~ public facilities, growth phasing, etc.).
l
. As a result of our assessment that the plan must be "do-able, " it was decided to split this study
into two phases. The purpose of the first phase is to draft a legal context memorandum. It will
be a written report addressing Dublin's potential use of these growth management tools and
regulations. Following receipt and assessment of that, the second phase will be undertaken by
Wallace, Roberts and Todd or another consultant. The balance of the original study will take
place in the second phase under a separate contract.
The revised scope and contract for the first phase are being reviewed by Wallace, Roberts and
Todd. The contract amount is $26,500 for the first phase. The second, and more expensive,
phase of the study will need to be based on the findings under this first contract. Staff expects
to receive the :.signed contract by September 4, 1998 for the first phase.
I
~~ of D~L~ M e m o
To: Dublin City Council Members
From: Tim Hansley, City Manager
Initiated By: Rick Helwig, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development
Bobbie Clarke, Director of Planning
Date: September 17, 1998
Update: Southwest Area Study
This is a brief update on our progress on the goal adopted by City Council regarding an in-depth
planning study of the Southwest area of Dublin.
The revised scope and contract for the first phase of the Southwest Area Study have beat signed
by Wallace, Roberts and Todd. The first phase will center on implementation tools and legal
mechanisms of development control. The second phase of the study will need to be based on tln
findings under this first contract. An all day work session (to begin Phase I) is scheduled for
September 21: This meeting is to involve the Chairperson of the Development Committee, the
°~"'~'" Chairperson of the Planning Commission, the City's legal counsel, a Washington Township
representative, and City staff.
The purpose of the September 21 work session is to identify and review growth management
issues with the planning and legal consultants and to establish the parameters for the legal
feasibility study. In the morning session, Eric Damion Kelly (legal consultant) will make a
presentation on growth management tools followed by a group discussion of issues. The
afternoon session is geared toward consultant interviews with key persons in attendance. The
information obtained from this work session will be made a part of the legal feasibility study.
The Phase I process is to be completed by October 22, 1998
~~
manager and legal advisor and WRT's partner-in-charge and project director. City staff
will determine the format o~the presentations and discussions to be conducted during the
day (workshops, presentations to City boards, etc.).
Estimated Cost:
,~,,, Labor (52 hours) $6,322
Direct Expenses $2,375
Total $8,697
SOUTHWEST AREA PLAN
CITY OF DUBLIN, OH
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
11 /24/1998
Local Perspective Interviews
Development Subcommittee/Public Workshop #1:
Issues, Threats, and Opportunities
Submission of Alternatives Report
Council Community Development Committee
Concept Review and Refinement/Public Workshop #2
Submission of Preliminary Draft Plan
Submission of Draft Plan and Ordinance
Submission of Final Draft Plan and Ordinance
Public Workshop #3: Final Review and Adoption
December 2 to 4, 1998
January 5 or 6, 1999
Week of February 15, 1999
Week of March 1, 1999
Week of March 29, 1999
Week of May 10, 1999
June 1, 1999
June 1999
Note: The above schedule assumes aone-week turnaround for staff comments on the Preliminary
Draft Plan, Draft Plan and Ordinance, and Final Draft Plan and Ordinance.
- - EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Phase One: Defining Issues, Threats, and Opportunities
I.I Data Collection and Analysis
,~„ The Consultant will review pertinent prior plans and studies, including the Dublin Community
Plan and the 1993 Southwest Area Plan. Together with digital and other data provided by the
~,,.,,, City, information from these sources will be used to prepare a series of maps chazacterizing
existing conditions, including land use, zoning, and key natural resources. The status of all
planned, proposed and committed (approved) developments will be recorded along with the
status of all planned public improvements, based on information provided by the City. The
Consultant also will review field conditions and photographically record typical conditions.
I.2 Local Perspective Interviews
As a means of gauging the degree of consensus on community values and future aspirations for
the Southwest Area, the Consultant will, over atwo-day and two-night period, conduct a series of
brief one-on-one or small group interviews, as deemed appropriate. These interviews will
include key staff, council members, planning and zoning commissioners, civic leaders,
neighborhood and business associations, key property owners, and members of the farming
community, as determined by the City.
I.3 Development Patterns and Trends
The Consultant will review development permit and population growth data in order to estimate
probable future development patterns and loss of presently rural areas to suburban sprawl.
Additionally, the entire Southwest Area will be evaluated and ranked in one of several categories,
as follows:
• Existing Development -- Stable
• Existing Development -- Obsolescent
• Undeveloped -- Short Term Development Probability
~ Undeveloped -- Long Term Development Probability
• Undeveloped -- Protected
l.4 Natural Resources and Community Character
In conjunction with Task 1.1, the key elements of the character of the Southwest Area will be
mapped and evaluated. These will include primary conservation areas (i.e., azeas with
development constraints), such as wetlands and floodplains, as well as areas in public ownership
or otherwise relatively immune from development pressures. Secondary conservation areas will
also be mapped and evaluated. These areas will include unprotected elements of the natural and
cultural landscape deserving preservation, such as woodlands and other important habitat and
azeas of high scenic, historic or cultural value. These resources may later become the framework
that defines greenways, open space and wildlife corridors and other azeas worthy of special
protection measures.
In addition to the evaluation of natural resources, an overall assessment of elements in the
Southwest Area important toy urban design and community character will be conducted,
addressing such elements as the characteristics of existing development, gateways and corridors,
landmarks, and character zones:
1.5 Workshop One: Issues, Threats and Opportunities
*~ In the first of three community workshops, the Consultant will review input received from local
perspective interviews, conclusions from the evaluation of development patterns and trends,
natural resources, and community chazacter. The Consultant will then facilitate aconsensus-
building process to pinpoint key elements of community chazacter worthy of preservation and/or
community investments. These identified issues, threats and opportunities will become the focus
for the prepazation of development concepts in Phase Two.
Phase Two: Concept Development
2.1 Preliminary Alternative Concepts
In this phase the Consultant will develop preliminary alternative concepts for the future of the
Southwest Area. These concepts will be developed based upon the issues, threats, and
opportunities identified in Phase One, and are expected to address the following:
2.1.1 Land Use Patterns
The Consultant will depict and describe up to three alternative patterns of land use and
density, refining the conceptual land use pattern contained in the Dublin Community Plan
to establish an image of the Southwest Area consistent with the character of the rest of the
city.
2.1.2 Natural, Scenic and Open Space Systems
As part of alternatives development, the primary and secondary conservation areas
defined in Task 1.4 above will become the basis for identifying an open space system
comprising elements such as greenways, parks, bikeways; wildlife corridors, waterways
and other components of a "green" network throughout the Southwest Area.
2.1.3 Elements of Community Character
In contrast to the "green" component above, the elements of community character will
include characteristics of the man-made environment, including the road network and
roadway design features, designated azeas for redevelopment and revitalization, and areas
subject to unique design guidelines or development criteria. Additionally, key
community landmazks will be addressed including gateways, historic sites and structures,
community facilities and infrastructure systems. Likewise, a concept or concepts for the
creation of a "village center" in Amlin will be explored.
2
2.1.4 Preliminary Development Standards
"Conceptual support drawings" will be prepared by the Consultant as necessary to depict
conceptual approaches to certain key design and development criteria. Drawings will be
prepared at suitable scales to depict the following elements:
• Roadway cross-sections (and buffer details)
• Subdivision design criteria, including conservation subdivision design and/or
,~,. various "neotraditional"forms
• Village center
• Prototypical neighborhood retail development
• Prototypical multifamily development
2.1.5 Development/Redevelopment Strategic Opportunities
In addition to exploring the manner in which the City can influence development quality
through design criteria and investments in capital improvements (roads, parks,
infrastructure, greenways, etc.), this task will explore additional strategic opportunities.
These may include areas designated for redevelopment so as to directly control the
process of replacing land uses. Also suggested will be opportunities for City acquisition,
assembly and disposition of undeveloped areas that would more effectively ensure the
creation of the desired community character.
2.2 Workshop Two: Concept Review and Refinement
In the second workshop, the Consultant will present the concepts developed in Task 2.1, which
are expected to include the following elements:
• Land uses and densities
• "Green" networks
+""""' Community character
• Development standards, and
°"' • Development/redevelopment strategies
Once again, the Consultant's role during this community workshop will be to facilitate a
consensus-building process leading to preferred concepts in each of the categories listed above.
Phase 3.0: Plan and Ordinance
3.1 District Plan
The District Plan will consist of a combination of graphics and text, prepared in format
compatible with WordPerfect. As determined by the results of previous phases of the planning
process, specific components of the plan may include the following:
3
3.1.1 Illustrative Land Use Plan
This plan will consist of acolor-rendered diagram schematically depicting land use and
density patterns, along with key elements of "green" networks (open space systems) and
community character (village center, roadway corridors, etc.).
3.1.2 "Green "Networks
This component will comprise diagrams and text describing areas identified and defined
for protection through various incentive tools, ranging from conservation easements to
fee simple acquisition.
3.1.3 Elements of Community Character
These elements, as stated previously, will include village center development, and
development standards pertaining to roadways, single family subdivisions, multifamily
development, neighborhood retail, etc.
3.1.4 Development/Redevelopment Strategies
Strategies established for development and/or redevelopment will encompass areas
designated for land use changes, as well as for direct City involvement in guiding such
changes.
3.1.5 Implementation Element
The implementation element will set out the estimated costs, responsibilities and "next
steps" necessary to attain the goals of the plan.
3.2 Draft Overlay Zone Ordinance
The Consultant will draft one Overlay Zone Ordinance for the Southwest Area consistent with
Ohio law, including purpose statement, permitted and conditional uses, development standards,
procedures, and appeal process. As determined by previous steps of the planning process, the
ordinance will incorporate land use and development standards pertaining (as directed) to
conservation subdivision development, "neotraditional" design, buffers, setbacks, etc.
3.3 Review and Refinement
The Consultant will make adjustments to the graphics and text aihong the above deliverables in
response to Staff review. Text prepared for the final presentation will be consistent in format
with the "Dublin Community Plan" and will be provided to staff in hard and compatible
electronic copies.
3.4 Workshop Three: Final Review and Adoption
Over a two to three-day period, the Consultant will participate in a series of public presentations
to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for final review and adoption of
the District Plan and the Overlay Ordinance.
4
'Ar
i
CITY OF DUBLIN ~ ~ ~ O
To: Dublin City Council Members
mom: Tim Hansley, City Manager ~;
Initiated By: Rick Helwig, Assistant City Manager irector of Development
~~3obbie Clarke, Director of Planning
Date: December 1, 1998
Update: Southwest Area Study
For your information, we have attached two memos that you received explaining the rationale
and outlining the process for the first phase of the Southwest Area Study. This first part of the
Southwest Area Study (determining possible methods of implementation which could be available
in Ohio) is complete. A copy of the Supplemental Recommendations for Implementation has
been distributed to City Council and copies will'be distributed to the Planning Commission this
week.
The second, more involved, part of the six-month study is currently underway. A revised scope
of services and schedule aze attached to familiarize you with the process and expected
e~-* products/deliverables. The schedule outlines tentative meeting dates and the time frame for
deliverables. The study is made up of three phases with a public workshop at the end of each
~"' phase. Representatives from our consulting firm, Wallace, Roberts and Todd are beginning the
data collection and analysis phase. They are conducting local perspective interviews from
December 2-4, 1998.
The first of three public workshops is tentatively scheduled for the week of January 4, 1999.
The remaining two workshops are scheduled for early Mazch and early June 1999. The final
draft plan and overlay district ordinance will also be submitted in June.