85-99 OrdinanceRECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No. 30043
Ordinance No.
Passed - ----------- --------- -- --19-------
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2000-2004 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Section 8.03 (a) of the Dublin City Charter requires the City Manager to
prepare and submit to City Council afive-year capital program in accordance with the
annual budget calendar as authorized by City Council; and
WHEREAS, City Council has received and reviewed the Five-Year Capital Improvements
Program (CIP) for the years 2000-2004; and
WHEREAS, the CIP represents along-term financial plan which establishes priorities,
identifies project costs and phasing, identifies funding sources and serves as a planning
document for capital improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Administration has incorporated in the attached CIP all modifications as
requested by City Council as a result of the CIP budget workshops.
NOW~REFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of
Ohio, elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the 2000-2004 Five-Year Capital Improvements Program attached as an
Exhibit be, and hereby is, approved.
Section 2. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the earliest date permitted
by law.
Passed this v~'r ~ day of ( ~", 1999
G
Mayor -Presiding Officer
TTEST:
Clerk of Council
G:\PER\DKP\9904-CIP\Copy of CIP-ORD-85-99.doc
i hetehY r_ert~fy that copies of this Ordinance/Resolution were
City of Dublin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the Ohio I
~5~ Cl,r of Council, Dublin, Ohio
i in tl
'Cods
Department of Finance
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, Ohio 43017-1006
CITY OF DUBLIN Phone: 614-761-6500 • Fax: 614-889-0740
Memo
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Timothy C. Hansley, City Manager
Date: July 15, 1999
Re: Ordinance No. 85-99, An Ordinance Adopting The 2000-2004 Five-Year Capital
Improvements Program
Initiated by: Marsha I. Grigsby, Director of Finance ~
Ordinance No. 85-99 provides for the adoption of the updated Five-Year Capital Improvements
Program (CIl'). The attached worksheets reflect the projects to be programmed in the five-year period
and incorporates modifications City Council requested during the July 7 and July 13 review meetings.
The CIP document will be finalized for the August 9, 1999 public hearing. The document will be in
a format consistent with past years.
The following modifications have been incorporated in the worksheets as directed by City Council:
Parks and Recreation
Non-mai or Projects
^ The development of Hawks Nest Park has been adjusted to provide funding for construction in 2001
instead of 2000.
^ The development of Shannon Glen Park has been deferred by one year. Design and construction
are programmed to occur in 2002 instead of 2001. The design and construction of the bikepath
bridge along Brand Road is still programmed for 2000.
^ The development of Wedgewood Park, both design and construction, is programmed for 2000.
Construction was previously programmed to occur in 2001.
^ The development of Martin Commons Park is programmed to occur in 2000 instead of 2002.
^ The Trabue Nature Reserve previously identified as number 03-01 has been consolidated with the
Trabue Nature Reserve project identified as number 94-01.
Memorandum
Page Two
July 15, 199
Transportation
Non-major Projects
^ The project to add landscaping along both sides of Post Road has been deleted. Plans will be
submitted to City Council at a later date for review and evaluation.
^ The project to signalize the intersection of Riverside Drive and Bright Road was deferred by one
year and is now programmed for the year 2004.
Administration
Non-major Projects
The funding for the utility burial project was increased by $160,000 in 2000. This increase was
programmed as a result of deleting the $160,000 that had been identified for additional landscaping
along Post Road.
Other issues discussed at the July 13 meeting that City Council requested the Administration to provide
follow-up information included:
- Evaluation of the need to add alert-hand turn lane on Riverside Drive as a result of
installing the traffic signal at the intersection of Riverside Drive and Summitview Road.
- Evaluate the need to update the traffic signalization study.
- Follow-up with ODOT on the status of their project at the intersection of Dublin Road
and Glick Road and the issue of adding turn lanes.
- Review the need to complete the wall replacement project at South Riverview Street and
East Bridge Street prior to next year.
"~ Two major Transportation projects, Southwest Traffic Improvements and Tuttle Crossing Extension,
will be further evaluated by City Council at the July 19 Council meeting. The report and
recommendations from the Southwest Transportation Task Force will be presented and reviewed at the
meeting.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
T:\99\170-mg-memo to go with ord 85-99.doc
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
zooo - zooa
CITY OF DLBLII
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
,~
,`
:~
~~~
,,~
~.
~.
~.
~.
Capital Budget Process
~~
Financial Guidelines
3
Revenue Projections
4
Major Projects
5
Voted Debt Authority
6
Municipal Debt
~.
~.
,~
®AVERY '" Table 'n Tabs'" Dividers
7
Non-Major Project Funding
_~
a ~,1~,
;~
~~.
,,.
a
M,~.
- ~-
Wr
~,
~~,
2000 - 2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
CAPITAL BUDGET PROCESS
The City of Dublin has implemented an annual schedule for the preparation and adoption of the Five-Year
""' Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and the Operating Budget, which includes the annual capital budget.
The following time frames are key elements in the annual budget calendar:
First quarter City Council goal setting session(s)
~. End of March Adoption of goals by City Council
~"" End of June Completion of the Administration's recommended
Five-Year CIP
July/August City Council review of recommended CIP
End of October Completion of the Administration's recommended
~* Operating Budget
~" November City Council review of recommended Operating Budget
By December 31 Adoption of Operating Budget and Appropriations
°'~' Ordinances by City Council
~°" The Five-Year CIP and the Operating Budget are two critical documents prepared annually. The relationship
between these two documents is summarized by the following points:
Five-Year CIP
~r
~,,,, Represents along-term financial plan, including funding sources.
• Establishes priorities and serves as a planning document or blueprint for the City's investment in
capital infrastructure.
• Provides a breakdown of major project costs and phasing.
• Does not appropriate money.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-CIP~2004
1-1
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
The Five-Year CIP establishes the City's blueprint for investments in its capital infrastructure. This
document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City's long and short-term capital investments are
made in the context of careful consideration of the City's needs as well as the resources available to
fund all projects.
The financial guidelines used in the preparation of the CIP will provide assurance that the City can
meet, in a full and timely manner, both our debt service obligations and all the other obligations
competing for the available resources. It is our objective to complete as many needed capital
improvement projects as fmancially possible while maintaining flexibility and the ability to adapt
to changes as they occur.
There are several key guidelines which the administration utilized in determining the City's fiscal
capacity to complete capital projects over the next five years. These are summarized as follows:
The five-year plan will be updated annually.
25 percent of the City's 2 percent income tax revenue shall be made available to fund
capital improvements. This allocation is in accordance with Ordinance No. 17-87
and the ballot language approved by the voters in November 1987.
Of the 25 percent of the total incom unt will be aallocated to fund to g term debt
improvements, 60 percent of that amo
and 40 percent to fund projects and capital expenses on a cash basis. The reasons for
this guideline are:
a) It is important to stress that funding projects with long-term debt obligates the
use of public funds for the next 20 years in most cases. The more long-term
debt which is incurred now significantly reduces the options available to
future City Councils to fund needed projects.
b) The City has determined that paying cash for projects where fmancially
possible (pay-as-you-go financing) will increase our flexibility in the future.
In utilizing pay-as-you-go financing, revenue projections and estimated fund
balances will be reviewed and evaluated to assure that sufficient reserves are
maintained.
c) It is not economical to issue debt for some projects.
d) The estimated life of some projects does not meet the criteria to issue long-
term debt.
07/15/99
t\per~dkp~2004 2 1
Income tax revenue projections will be conservative. We are projecting a rate of
growth in income tax revenue as follows:
1999 - 12% 2002 - 4%
2000 - 8% 2003 - 3%
2001 - 6% 2004 - 3%
Our prof ections may appear to be conservative in light of previous trends; however,
these projections are being used to determine the amount of long-term debt that can
be retired using income tax revenues. To incur substantial long-term debt based upon
a high rate of growth could result in a serious financial strain on the City if those
growth projections are not achieved. Issuing long-term debt, in most cases, will
result in debt service payments over a 20 year period. Issuing long-term debt based
on less than conservative growth estimates would not be a financially sound
approach.
To the degree that the income tax revenue rate of growth exceeds our projections in
any given year, the excess revenue should be utilized to fund projects on a cash basis
the following year. Again; it would not be fiscally prudent to incur long-term debt
based upon sporadic peaks and valleys which might occur in income tax growth in
future years.
A minimum of 10% of the estimated revenue in the General Fund will be maintained
as a reserve. The availability of adequate financial reserves or balances that can be
used to address unforeseen contingencies is a critical element in evaluating financial
strength.
A significant portion of the projects included in the CIP will be paid for using cash
reserves. Because of the extensive transportation needs, the City will commit at least
50 percent of identified available reserves for transportation improvements.
Since a significant amount of the needed capital improvements now, and in the
future, are utility (water and sewer) related, the systems' user fees and capacity
charges (tap permits) will continue to be evaluated. Water related improvements will
be programmed based on the Water Fund's available cash reserves and estimated
annual revenues. The needed sewer system improvement, the construction of the
Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor, has been funded with a OEPA/OWDA low-
interest loan retired and the loan will be retired utilizing the Sewer Fund's available
cash reserves and estimated annual revenues. Every effort will be made to structure
the debt service obligations for utility infrastructure improvements in such a manner
as to utilize the Sewer Fund and Water Fund available cash reserves and estimated
annual revenues to the fullest and thereby reducing or eliminating the dependency on
income tax revenues.
The maximum amount of debt to be issued is 10 percent less than the maximum
amount of debt that can be supported by the income tax revenue allocated as
available for annual debt service obligations, see page 3-2. This guideline provides
an additional buffer in the event that income tax revenues fall short of projections or
that an unexpected increase in interest rates occurs.
07/15/99
t:\per\dkp\2004 2-2
will do the following in order to be able to
As a matter of general policy, the City
• fund additional projects needed to serve the citizens of Dublin:
federal, state and local assistance in the form of grants, low interest
a) Pursue
loans, cost-sharing, etc.
sment rocedures for projects which ha easel es tobthis type
b) .Utilize asses p
defined group of beneficiaries and which legally lend t
of financing.
at wa s to obtain revenue through user fees as a way to
c~ Look increasingly y to free-up other income tax dollars so that
fund capital projects or as a way
they can be used to fund capital projects.
where appr°priate, economic development incentives such as tax
d) Utilize,
increment financing.
osed for funding, the statutory debt limitations will be reviewed to ensure
As projects are prop on the "in-side millage will be evaluated so we do not
compliance. The affects, if any,
~nancial health of the City or any overlapping taxing jurisdictions.
adversely affect the f Z'llese projects
ear ro am is an aggressive program• am each year,
It should be noted that the recommen ea fi eriod so hagrt as we updat ne c riorit es~gr
need to bea uat t he dCapital needserevenue growth, and respond to p
we can ev
0
07/15/99
2-3
a.
~w
2000 -2004
~ FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
The primary funding source for the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the City's ..
income tax revenue. Section 2 outlines the fmancial guidelines used in determining our fiscal
capacity to complete capital projects.
~ In addition to the income tax revenues, the projects that are associated with the water and sewer
_ systems will be funded in whole or in part by revenues from those systems (i.e. user charges and tap
permit fees).
The following. pages provide projections for income tax revenues and proj ections for the water and
'~ sewer system operations. The assumptions used for the projected water and sewer system operations
are included.
One assumption that is a significant change from earlier years relates to the debt service obligation
~. for the Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor (USWBI). The current five-year CIP assumes 100%
of the OPEA/OWDA low-interest loan will be repaid from Sewer Fund revenues. We will continue
to monitor closely the revenues and the available resources in the Sewer Fund.
W
07/15/99
~' T:\per\dkp\2004 3-1
a
v
0
O
N
M
C
C
n
Q C
~7 c~
~ ~
d Z
0
~ W
W ~
~~
Oa
oaf
N ~ W
C
~ Q W G
N a xx~ c
Ua
Q W
W
}' ~ C
~ Z C
0
C
C
~ o ~ v ~ i
co v rn v_ rn ~
~
~ I~
r oo aD
0
N r r
~
G
0 M 0
0
O
`ct N
r ~t I~ r!'
-~ t0
(~
69
GOD ~ M ~ M ~
M 0 st r GO O
~ O r ti M N
r I~ 1~ O r (~
~ r ~ c`tO
ti ~ M ~ M ~
M O O O I~ O
O ~ GOO ~ M M
00 '~t ~ a0 O O
ui
~t ~ ~ cD o ~
Efl
N O ONO N r ~
00 t` 00 O O h
O O M O
~ ~ C
D.
~t
~ r
r ~ co ~
.Cfl O
CD
~ o
o n m rn
~ OOD ~ M M ~
'
0 M r N In r
I
r
~ O
r ~ CD M
CD ti
to
~ 'ct ~ 000 M ~
0 r DO N r 0
r
i
~
O
N
~
~ ~ CO O
0 O
O
00
M Oi M Cn ao
0 N
Cn
ffj
r 0 ~t r
O
O O
~ to
C
D
1 _
~
~
N
~ M ~ ~
M a0 M 0 tC j ~F
EA
.-.
c
7
'.
~ n
m ~
w O
E
CCf
O
~ ~ U 'O ~
~ c E
m n a~ a~ a~ •
O
> . ~.
~
.fl .fl N
~ to ~ U ~
~,..,
O 'O 7
C ~ N
~ ,,..,
X .O
~ ~
QO' Q
V~ +-. N
~~ N~ O N~ N C
N
~ U
7 ~ 7 ~ L
~ G)
~
~ ~
~ ~~ ~- c~ .,
_,
~N E'~
~ ~ ~ d ~ C6 ~ 'O O
. O O
U ~ In ~ U ~ ~' '
N O C
U N O
O
c ~ N ~ ~ _
~ ~
3-2
~
-r-
U
O
~O
Q ~
ca -~
...
'Q O
U ~ Q-
N ` ~ ~
~ to
U
0
N "a
~
O C
O O
d ~ ..0..
~ N ~ U
.--~
O_ ~ N ~
ca O ~ ~-•
U U ~ C N
.
O a
~ ~ c6 O
0 0 0 ~ ~
~ N N y
.
(0 ~ ~ ~
~
O O
~
U
O T N
~ ~
O Q. ~
• ~
L
L
Q~
Q y
y
L i~ '~
N 4~-. ~ C
~ L' (n C/~
C
O
~
O
~ ~ ~
U m ~ E ++
> L C
RJ w+ ~
>
U
~ 3
~ i
~
~ sc
~ C ~
a
.
U
(0 ~
~ N O
~ !l7
~
... c6 a. Q 'C
N
U ~ (0 CO O U O
N L"' L (O L N
Q ,~
~
U (~
R
~
~
~ S
O
-C
O O
~ C C N ....
O O ~ ~
.
.
to ~ O
O N r-~ 'd
O
~ ~ O
c \ to ~ .~
> ~ N N
~ O O
~' O
C O
N~OEE
~ o
(Lf N o 0 0 0 0 .C .C _
4- 4- CO V~
. r 00 l.0 v"~' M M O O~ N~
0 0 O
~~ 0 N '
\~
0 CO
O
o
°
~ mrnooooo oU= ~
~tc
C ~~-NNNNN .-..~.-.~Rf
~ ~-NM~t
* ~~~~
O
~_
ti
O
r-~
51f1 __ _.-...._. _ _
e
O
P-~
a~
a~
0
.'..,
U
d-
O
O
N
,--~
. O
~F--~
U
.~
0
^~
F~
O
U
--~
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~'
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
M N ~
0
0
N
M
O
O
N
O
0
N
.--{
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
01
01
00
01
01
r--i
01
01
e--1
v,
a,
~-
~,
0
a~
a~
a~i
cd
a~
0
U
3-3
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED REVENUE, EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN SEWER FUND CASH BALANCE
,.
~~
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Revenues:
User charges
$1,140,511
$1,164,000
$1,181,952
$1,217,052
$1,252,152
$1,287,252
$1,319,652
Tap fees 1,622,508 621,000 560,625 520,000 520,000 480,000 480,000 ~
Interest 560,944 450,000 428,600 423,291 415,807 393,181 380,897
Other
Income tax subsidy 45,674
180,691 0
175 033 0
169,291 0
163,463 0
157,551 0
151,595 0
145,598
3,550,328 2,410,033 2,340,468 2,323,806 2,345,510 2,312,028 2,326,147
Expenses:
Salaries/wages
295,694
345,000
365,700
387,642
410,901
435,555
461,688 ~"
Benefits/uniforms 101,193 131,800 139,708 148,090 156,976 166,394 176,378 ~
Utilities 38,029 23,000 24,380 25,843 27,393 29,037 30,779
Contract services 96,244 99,500 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 .~
Repairs and maintenance 50,300 160,000 169,600 179,776 190,563 201,996 214,116
West Branch maintenance
Other 0
62,085 0~
25 000 0
26 500 0
28,090 0
29 775 0
31 562 0
33,456
~
643,545 784,300 775,888 819,441 865,608 914,544 966,417
Capital expenditures 13,828 292,000 50,000 50,000 410,000 75,000 75,000
Debt service:
Existing
180,691
175,033
169,291
163,463
157,551
151,595
145,598
New 884 158 1,478,000 1,478,000 1 478,000 1 478 000 1,478 000 1,478,000
1,064,849 1,653,033 1,647,291 1,641,463 1,635,551 1,629,595 1,623,598
Net cash (required)
provided
1,828,106
(319,300)
(132,711)
(187,098)
(565,648)
(307,111)
(338,868)
Beginning balance 9 206 188 11,034,294 10 714,994 10,582 283 10 395,185 9 829 536 9,522,426
Ending balance $11 034 294 $10 714 994 $10 582,283 $10,395,185 $9,829,536 $9,522,426 $9,183,558
07/15/99
3-4
~.
,~
~.
_a
~.
•.
,~
2000 -2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
SEWER FUND ASSUMPTIONS
Projected User Charges and Tap Fees
Assumptions:
• Revenues based on estimated ERUs and fees as authorized by Ordinance 14-92.
• Average number of ERUs for 1998 reflects a growth of 286. This is based on the number
of residential building permits issued in 1997 for new units.
• Average number of ERUs for 1999 and forward are the total of the previous year's average
number of ERUs and the previous year's estimated ERU growth.
• Estimated ERU growth for 1999 through 2004:
1999 - 325
2000 - 325
2001 - 325
2002 - 325
2004 - 300
• Beyond 2009 estimated ERU growth:
2003 - 2007 - 300
2008 - 2012 - 275
Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Chafes in Sewer Fund Cash Balance
Assumptions:
• Revenues for user charges and tap fees are based on the schedule of Projected User Charges
and Tap Fees.
• Interest income is based on previous year's ending fund balance and an interest rate of 4
percent for 1999 and forward.
• Inflow and infiltration removal program will be on-going.
• Subsidy for debt service is the debt service obligation that matures each year for the lift
station improvements.
07/15/99
T:\per\dkp\2004
3-5
Sewer Fund Assumptions (Continued)
• Debt service obligations identified as "New" reflects the annual debt service obligations for
the USWBI. This statement assumes the debt will be retired 100% from Sewer Fund ..
resources
The Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Sewer Fund Cash Balance. was
prepared through the year 2018. Using the above assumptions, sufficient revenue will be available
through the year 2016. The rate of growth, the user fees and capacity charges will continue to be
evaluated.
07/15/99
T:\per\dkp\2004
3-6
.~
~.
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED REVENUE, EXPENSES AND
CHANGES IN WATER FUND CASH BALANCE
~ 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
air
~ Revenues:
User charges
$721,095
$664,000
$684,840
$704,340
$723,840
$743,340
000
$761,340
000
450
Tap fees 1,216,267 487,500
264
000 487,500
463
323 487,500
822
305 487,500
328,699 450,
359,906 ,
390,185
Interest
Fire hydrant permits/Other 370,858
6,345 ,
1,000 ,
1,000 ,
1,000 1,000 1,000
37 1,000
818
301
~r Subsidy for debt service 522,397
2,836,962 476,992
1,893,492 470,783
1,967,586 419,960
1,918,622 402,441
1,943,480 389,8
1,944,083 ,
1,904,343
~. Expenses:
Salarieslwages
53,245
77,700
81,585
85,664
89,947
57
94,445
890
25
99,167
185
27
Benefits/uniforms 15,264
694
64 21,300
800
80 22,365
648
85 23,483
787
90 24,6
96,234 ,
102,008 ,
108,129
Utilities
Equipment maintenance ,
37,795 ,
47,000 ,
49,820 ,
52,809 '55,978
72 59,336
080
46 62,897
48
845
"°" Hydrant maintenance 17,737
500 36,500
000
25 38,690
000
10 41,011
000
10 43,4
10,000 ,
10,000 ,
10,000
'"" Other 7,
196,235 ,
288,300 ,
288,108 ,
303,755 320,289 337,760 356,222
.~ Capital expenditures 175,343 380,000 1,255,000 230,000 50,000 75,000 75,000
Debt service:
Existing
558,372
512,375
503,208
450,610
431,316
416,937
423
327,143
710
357
1994 issue 371,255 366,945
320
9 362,303
511
865 362,328
938
812 361,688
793,004 357,
774,360 ,
684,853
929,627 ,
87 , ,
Net cash (required)
'~ provided
1,535,757
345,872
(441,033)
571,929
780,187
756,963
788,268
Beginning balance 6,204,948 7,740,705 8,086,577 7,645,544 8,217,473 8,997,660 9,754,623
F Ending balance $7,740 705 $8 086 577 $7 645 544 $8,217,473 $8,997,660 $9,754,623 $10,542,891
07/15/99
s
rr
a+~r
3-7
1999- 2003
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
WATER FUND ASSUMPTIONS
The following information provides the assumptions used in the analysis.
Projected User Changes and Tap Fees
Assumptions:
• Revenues based on ERUs and authorized fees established by Ordinance 14-92.
• Average number of ERUs for 1998 reflects a growth of 286. This is based on the
number of residential building permits issued in 1997 for new units.
• Average number of ERUs for 1999 and forward are the total of the previous year's
average number of ERUs and the previous year's estimated ERU growth.
• Estimated ERU growth for.1999 through 2003
1999 - 325
2000 - 325
2001 - 325
2002 - 325
2003 - 300
• Beyond 2003 estimated ERU growth:
2004 - 2007 - 300
2008 - 2012 - 275
Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Water Fund Cash Balance
Assumptions:
• Revenues for user charges and tap fees based on schedule of Projected User Fees and
Projected Tap Fees.
• Salaries/wages and Benefits/uniforms included for water hydrant program.
• Other expenses assume a 6.00 percent inflation rate.
• Subsidy for debt service is the debt service obligation that matures each year for the
debt issued in 1990 and before, except for the Avery Road waterline.
• The 1994 issue debt service obligation provides funding for the debt service
obligations on the $4,100,000 in long-term bonds issued for the Rings/Blazer water ""'
tower. *°~
- w
07/15/99 '~"`
T:\per\dkp\2004
3-8 „~
..
.~
Water Fund Assumptions (Continued)
The Statement of Projected Revenue, Expenses and Changes in Water Fund Cash Balance was
prepared through the year 2014. Using the above assumptions, sufficient revenue will be available,
as well as maintaining a considerable reserve, throughout the life of existing and proposed debt
obligations. The rate of growth and the user fees and capacity charges will continue to be evaluated
to ensure that a deficit fund balance does not occur.
The assumptions do not have funding for additional water towers programmed. However, based on
estimated fund balances, sufficient funds are estimated to be available to begin programming these
capital projects.
07/15/99
T:\20-04-CIP~2004
3-9
r.
. ~`
2000 - 2004
FIVE-~~ CAPITAL ~pg~~ MENTS PROGRAM
NIAJO
~~ Proiect Prioritization
the Five-Year CIP several elements are taken into consideration: City Council goals,
In developing
both past and present; findings included in the Economi CDevealo eements~th ~esiden s'~opinio s ~
by the City in agreements such as tax increment finan g gr
~. voiced b their vote in 1990 which authorized the City to issue voted debt for transportation
im rovements, parkland acquisition, municipal facilities constructie coma let d during thehrece t
p recreation center; and the community sun' Y p
~„ of a community ro ects to be funded that are
Community Plan update process.. Utilizlovements su h as roads and ut lity needs. Higher priority
~"' biased towards needed infrastructure unp ursued or has been
.~. is also given to projects where federal, state and local assistance is being p
approved.
The ma'or projects included in the Five-Year CIP total $139.9 million. Of the total, $90.7 million
or 64.8% is for transportation related projects. This is a ro tl im ortancev to providee an adequate
°"' of our reliance on income tax revenues, rt is of utm p
transportation system to help retain our current business customers as well as encourage new
business to locate in Dublin.
ro ect descriptions, and a recap of the funding
~"' The following pages reflect the projects to be funded, p j
sources.
,~, 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc 4-1
~...
O
O
N
o
O
(~ N
a
Cq
W rn
C
U
G r
W
W
~
O ~ ~
oaa
N ~
~p
° ~ ~
~~
o
~ Q Z _
~ Q
Nam ~'~
Q
U
r
} ~
LL
n.
0 O
O 0
0
o
°
O
0
0
vi
m
E
:..
~ ..
a~
o °
O
°
°
°
Z+
c~
c
.
~
m
L
Q
C,
° ° O O °
~ °
~
~ ° U
~ ~..
~ i
U
O
o
o
~
Oj
O
°
N
to
~
O
O
O
o
o
N
O
0
O
O
N
O O
0 0
~° ~
~
O
°
p
~ Y
O r
3
~
~
•~ A
'D
c
`~' N
~ o O ° M °
00 N ~
0 O O
O O C
O M O
° O O ~
~ u,
CO CO r -
~ 0 o
0 ~ O O
n p U
~ I n 0
0 N O M N O N
~-- ~ p
j n ~ `r
~ ~ ~ M
• "
~
-- C' 7 ~
0
U
00 M M O O • ~
'7 CO O CC V
) ~. .. CA O
O O ~ O O O 0 p ~-- M n r M O In ~
M ~- N
M o
~ ~ ~
( rn ~ o ao
nOCA M w o n
M
O
M
0
^ a o
~ 00
CO 0
O ~ ..~
V N p
C
O V
~ n OM
C
O 0
0_
O
M
r O
O M 0~0 ~ ~
t
~ CO ~ n O .
-• '~ Y CA ~ Cn0 O ~ n
et h
N
~
~„
~
V' M O
~
sr N C7
N N ~ N C` ')
N
~ ~
w+
`- N r } CO ~ M ~ N O ~ O
C A ~ ire
M r .
N
~
CA M st 0 0
~ ~ ^ O (O
~ O O O O
~ ~ O O
(T ) O O Op p ~On
N N tnO
O
M ~ M
O O ~ -
~
O
~ O
~ n0~ M
~ p
j
MOMCO '
Y C
O V
ChMn
~ C
O ~
O ~ IIM
M
~ O Mln tO M M ~- `:
~ M In n M ~ ~o 'ct CNOM N~~ N M ~
~ ~ ~ N ~ O C
O O
~ O M N N V
N ~ r j N
C
. ~.
N
N ~
O U ~
N ~
O
~ c U
aQi ~ ~ ~'
U O
C ~ ~ ~
- }, N
.C C N y C U
U ~ - y C O N C y p to (0
j .~ ~ O N ry N w Q. w .fl
m~ 3 c j~ 't7 c a 0 O to ~
V7 c (n a~i j 0 ~ m O~ ~ ~ (Q
j~ O ~ C c Q c >~ N~ ~
~ ~ ~ w c ~ v~ w ~~ ~ ~rn N•v~ O
a, a>
O ~•.. rn ~ W ~ O W ~ ~ W d ~ N ~ y U
C7I C C .O-~ f6 C N y (O N In W O Y W V] .f+
~ '~ o •j X v ~ ~ o ~ x ~° ~ o•~ °' ~~ o°~ N> c o aci ~~ c o y N
y ... mom. x ~x ~ o~ ~o •~
Q C~ O w U~~ Y.. U O~~ .0 U C L_ f0 C L ZT C y- ~ L •Op~ C N- E L 7 V) y-
~ W Q U O Q O Q Q U O p V Q Q U O O (Lp ~ U 0« ~ ~- ~ S•O~+p+`~ ~ CgO.L. ~ ~ ~
F-Cq ~.M F.,,~000O~OQQUO~UQQUO O F- ~
`- N ~•
~ ~ ~
4-2 ~ o
o
o
0
v
0
0
N
OI Ip
O
a
M
O
~ O
N
O O
O p O
O
~s
N
111 O
N
O O
O O 0 ~ O
O
` O ~ ~
O
~ ~ ~
;arr r
O N N
O
N
O
O
p
p
~ 0 O O
~ O
arr O O O 0 ~ p
OO O ° O
O O ~
O l0
wt ~ O
O th M
Li. O
O ~
ors Vr N
+~a
~
O
~ O O o O
p O O p
a O O O O °
°
O O
O
O O~
p N O O H
~ M
~r ~ O O p 0
~ M E
~-
N
^ M
O •d
~ 00
~
Z (n O) c
`i M r
w ~ ~
~i r
w
"~ ~~
O O O
O O ° tieN-
~ O
'~ LL.
O p to
lf)
Q O M
N O
O
° O
O
~ O O
O O O
~
~ p
ti
O M G M
~
aeR O ~ Q.. ~ ~ ~ O ~ f0 N .~ c
+) O O N N r
~ ~
N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ `- ~
~
0 ~ c7 c7 M ~ O
rr ~
~ O ~ ~"~ rn i
6
~ ° M
0 -J
~ W ~
M ti
O Q Z
o
p O
~
LL
Q
O p 0 0 0 0 ~ p O °O O o0 0 0 0 op
O o
~
Q O ti
;~
U p
~ 0 O ~~ N N O
0 ~ O
0 0 0 0 0 0
000 ~
0 p~
np N ~~ r
~
JAS ~ ~(OO .~
~
°
d 0
° o ° ° 0
N ~
°~ r ~r
'~ °'. r
~ ~ rn r ~ ~. , o o
ch
M r ~ ~ ~ ~
Q J r O ~
ch M ~ ~ ~ ~
r l17 ~
~ M ~ M
~ ~ M CV
(O
} 0 ~ M
y*,,.: .~
f" 0
ll..
~1 O
.N
C
a
m ~
'
ar ~ o ~ ~
'~
N U ~
N .y+
~ ~ aNi
'~ ~ ~°-
'3 N c m
O a~ to N
~ m a
i
rn °? a~ y a
i
E "" U °i
c o
31f
U
C 0I C rn
~ C c
'C
O ~ C ~ ~ ~' C c 'C ~. > ~ ~ d
c
er ~ c '~ > d
° v_ d m O. c
~ ~
U
asp p
., ~
C ~_ ~
~ ~ c
O • 3 a, 3
I E
~'
~ m
N a
i ~ m
~ !~
O
O p1
N O]
~- ~ N
d C
N W ~ ~
w N
c y
' c W
C
o y C C
~ c~~
~ N w N ~ !~ c c 'O ~d o N ~
V1- ~ C~ O N 7 p 'V ~
U~
C O ~
- ~
c O N
' (0
. O O
~
X
N
U
~ ~ _
~~' ~
~
~ ~ O m F
0 O ~ U x
~ '- v
i
a
V i
a 'tn ~
?~ CO U ~
O w .N V ~
~ .
..
~ ~ .N
` ' ~ d
` ~ ..0+
N 'y ~ d
.= ~, 7 N N
~ U c ,c ~ t
f
C 'd ~ ~ C ~
cg O~ cc
(0 G V U O w ~
0 O Q 0 0 0 O O
O)
. ~.. j N
y -
t C y f0
UO }
Q QVO F-U ~ tn
~ O VO -iQ
' QUO ~~QQ ~~' -
OQ
0 00 QQ
O a
~ N
~ ~ O Or r r °
~ 00
4-3
0 O O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O O
O
O
O
M
O
O
N
O
O O
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
~' ~
O O O O O O
O
O
N
r
O
C o O
~ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0
°
° 0
i
O O 0 0 0 ~ o o ~
p ~ O o°OO°o o o°o ~
N .- t o .tn O M
CO O co M O
O
~
Q r ~ N N
~ ~
O
O O p O
O
Z Cn
O O
M
O O O
O 0 M
MOO C '7 O
) O
~ O O O
O
W F""
U Q)
O Ch O
~t .-- O
O ~ O n r CL
N M O O
NCO C O ~r
~ ~ ~ N
~ 0
O~'
a
N
0 ao
O
°
0
p
O
..e
~_ ~fA
~~ ^
O ~
~ ~ ~ o
0
rn 0 0°
~ o
O J Q
Q V o
O
~ O
~ ~
~ M 'ct
M to
N~
.,~ d} N c~ .~
~ ~
Q
U ~
O O C10 O
~ pp
~ O O O O
O O
O M 0 0 0
O O M C^ON00 N 0000 O OOOO O
Q -! ~-- P ~ O ~ to p O
lf) oM0 M 0000 ~ 0000 O
}
F- ~
~
~
~
O
~ ~
O
NOS
`-
N
OM
NCO000
O .may
W O Q ~ O O ~M M
O C
O
O In
Ch NCVNM ~
~ ~ U ~ O) ~ n O
_
LL ~-'.
y
C
N Q to ~
~ ~
O N ~
Q
~ ~
~~ L
a~
_
• L ~
L
r ~ ~ ~
~'~' ^
''
VJ
W ~
a?
tU
N~
~ N
_O
d 1
O
y
~
~
{.L ~ ~ ~ ~ C C Y 'C~ ~ ~ ~ rIk
1,,
>= N 3 c ~ M Qrn ~ w m co 0'rn
D m c C `
l' C ~ c ~
~W N '~~% h L mW w Y OW ~
o~O-cox
~' C
p
a'?o~o
'
' ~~oom
~ ~~coaoi a ~m~°~
~ d ~~~°~
3a''•=N~ x
t7 v
~~~"-'~~ x
[L~•y~m O ° ~
~y'y2°x'
-° o
~2m
tm~v _
~ >~ o
c°~'"~axi
'
Y 'C Q~ C N
~~ U O'C... -
~ Z pp7'~ O N
O~ U O w -
~ 7 (n
N v •U O w
~ Cn = '~ to ~
O U C L _
(9 ~
N _
-.
F U .pr C L
tp (II
N _N
t~ ,b
~= Q c O
aQQUO ~ WQQUO ~O Q~¢UO +
.
~ _
~QQUO o E °~So..,.
QQUO ..
W
...,
° 0 ~
1- W ~ Q¢U0
~ rn
~ in c fl ~ n
0
4-4 •
°
0 0
o
°
o 0
0
o O
0
ch M
~
O O
~ ~
O p ~
O O O
O O
M ~ ~ ~ 0
O ch M ~
N
O O
0
O
"~ O p ~ o
~ O ~
~ ° O
~
O O
~ M ~
~
O
~N N
O O O p ~ O O O
p O
O 0 O o O
~
~ to N N ~
-~ r
p M M N N
N
N
w
O O
O
O O O O
N O
N p
ch ~ o O
O ~ M M M
T
~ r
~
N ~
O
~
0-
O O O
o O O
O O
~ O
(n O O O M ~ p O
an Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ N
g U ~' cfl
W
W
~, O o 0
~t ~ ~
0
0 o
o ~ a o
o 0
N
~Q p[(A ~ p
,a. O ~ ~ M M
J L~ Q
oQZ ~w
N >-
~ ~ ~
Q
0
°o°p 0 0 0 0 0
O ° o 0 0 O
0
0
~r
U 00000
o o cn co 0
0°0
p O o
o o O o
~ 0
0
o 0 o O
11~A N O o CV (~J ~ ~_ p In ~
N 0
p O d0' 0 0 p
Q
W J ~
Q ~.-- N O M ~
~ ~n ca o N ~'
~i N r
M
cV N ~ N
~ ~~
~:,~ww w ~ Q ~ tf~ N
U
~
~. li
~
wr a>
Q
s
~ o
X
U
r~Y f0 ~
...
N
N
~
a~
~ c
oa ~
~°' 3 ~ v ~
~d tea? a°'i
°.~
1
fi~ W 'y N
w C w 7~
01 ~ O N ~
~
0 ~ C
X ~ ~ ,^
v~/ ~
a p ~ ~
Y
N
e!® ~
0 y
N > N
~ i
-Y
~~ ti c
N •rn C
C
.. X ~
Q U
a> U
I
'O
i O
y
%~
c
~ ~ ~ y
Q UJ N C ~
E W N ~ W
p~ c C LL
v
i
~ ~ ~ ~
O ~
c
~ ~ O O N
~ C C ~- N O N ~~ C O N ~ ~ :~ ~~~ U X
V ~ C O d ~ ~ 00 ~ O~ ~ U X ~ U 7 y U y 'N ~ N
~ 3 a; N .. ~n ~~ ;~ ~ °~
Q Q Q U O a Q V 0 F- 1-
~ Q Q U O~ U O
~p Q ~
~~ N M
~ O O N N N
N
~„ ~ 4-
OI
CO
M
M
_ ~
O
r
r
J
Q
O °'
~- ~'
0
i
~ __
H
z
w
w
> ~,
~ ~"
a~~
¢~Q
U
~ w
w
w
w
H
0
U
H
0
H
4-6
_,
..~
~~ 1, I.T er Scioto West Branch Interceptor
'~ was planned to provide the main sewer
~. The Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor (USWBI)
' erce for to transfer the sewage from the Dublin collector o C embus requiredthe
int p
~" treatment facility. The current service agreement with the ty
- ~ o a for construction costs associated with the portion o nthenU oWBf ah~ah~ch ddeep
City t p Y ect involved the co
the Dublin corporate boundaries. This proj el method minimizes
tunnel gravity sewer line parallel to Dublin Road. The deep tuna however,
surface disruption and adverse impacts on properties witp the constructi she °O d b the City
Ems. the capital cost involved was significant. Design of the ro ect was admire Y
'~ of Columbus.
i was awarded aloes-interest loan through the Ohio EPA to fund the project. During
The C ty
the construction period, drawdowns were received and interest' accrued on the draws. e
amount will be the total project costs plus accrued interThe first loan paymentpwas
final loan ents being required.
over a 20 year period with level debt paym ut in o eration in September
1, 1999 as a result of the interceptor being p p
made on January
~' 1998.
„~, ant from the Ohio Public Works
The City was ahe amount of $850,050. This grant was used to pay for the interest costs
`°~ Commission m t
,~„ accrued during the construction period.
until assed legislation in April 1992 increasing the sewer capacity charges and
~` City Co p
establishing a sewer surcharge. The intent of the legislation is to provide a revenue s eam
si 'ficantly reduce or eliminate the subsidy needed fromassume t ons then epaymenwof
to gni
~,.,,,, Fund for operating del 00%tfrom Se wr Fund resources.
the loan will be ma
al ro' ect reconciliation has not been completed. Negotiations with the City of
The fin p ~
Columbus need to be completed with regard to change orders to finalize and close-out t e
construction contract.
0
07/l5/99 4_7
,~, T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
2. S.R. 161 - Dale to Sawmill
This public improvement consists of widening a 4,800 foot section of S.R. 161 beginning
at Dale Drive and ending at Sawmill Road. The completion of this project will result in two
continuous eastbound and westbound lanes from Sawmill Road to Avery Road.
Major improvements associated with this street widening include: a reconstruction of the
intersections at Dale Drive, Dublin Center Drive and Sawmill Road with modifications to
existing turn lanes and existing signalization; providing one or two new signalized
intersections; providing a four lane boulevard street with curb and gutter; landscaped median
and shoulders; public utilities which include water mains, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers;
street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways.
In addition, this improvement includes planning, traffic studies, design, surveying,
geotechnical investigations, noise analysis, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and
sediment control, right-of--way and easement acquisition, right-of--way plat, private utility
coordination, service road between Dale Drive and Shamrock Boulevard, reconfiguration of
parking lots between LaScala, Franks Nursery, and Tommy's Shopping Center and other
activities necessary and appurtenant to the completion of this project.
Project costs reflected are total estimated project costs. The project has been approved by
Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission and is included in the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program for construction in 2000. The FederaUState funds will be utilized to
significantly offset the total project costs. City Council passed legislation in April 1992 to
establish a cooperative agreement with the State of Ohio, Department of Transportation for
this project.
The Environmental Assessment has been approved by the Federal Highway Administration '"'"~'
and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). Preliminary construction plans have
been reviewed by ODOT and the right-of--way acquisitions are substantially complete. "`~"`
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip\2004.doc
4-8
3, Scioto Brid a Construction
' ro'ect involves the construction of an additional bridge overanthc Sad on of this pr Je9t
This p J
the city purchased land on the west side of the Scioto River in
i entered into tax increment financing/economic developRo d onn thee we t and Dubllm
The C ty Coffman
for the construction of Emerald Parkway connecting
the east. The additional Scioto Bridge will be aligned with the new connector road.
Road on
t-of--entry on the east side
Design of the bridge was completed the first quarter of 1998. C ~ of Engineers, the Ohio
of the Scioto River and necessary permits from the Army ~
nt of Transportation and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources were acquired
Departure tember 1998. Construction of the
in 1998 and the construction contract was awarded in Sep
' d e is scheduled for completion in late 1999 early 200 construction of the bndg S
Scioto Bn g
in the amount of $7,518,000 wve be nefunded with cash resources.
The remaining project costs ha
~~
w. 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
~.
4-9
4• Frantz Road/SR 161 U rade
Major improvements associated with this intersection improvement include: reconstruction
of the intersection at Frantz Road/S.R. 161/Post Road and Frantz RoadlMetro Place North
with modifications to the existing turn lanes and existing signalization; providing curb and
gutter with the street widening; providing access to the McKitrick property with Frantz Road
median breaks and Metro Place North access; landscaped medians and shoulders; public
utilities which include water mains, sanitary sewers, and storm sewers; burial of utility lines;
mastarm traffic signals; street lighting; sidewalks and bikeways and interconnection of
various signals.
Construction is complete. The landscaping contract for the project was awarded in April
1999 and will be completed in the fall.
The City was awarded a grant from the Ohio Public Works Commission in the amount of
$2.7 million for this project. The remainder of the project has been funded with City cash
resources.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-10
5, Darree Fields Development
~ 's ro' ect includes the development of the park in accordance with the completed Master
Tlu p 1 com leted include the necessary gro~d
plan. Improvements currently completed or being p edestrian wallcways,
fencing, building structures, landscapin ed for 1999 will provide
~• improvements, including
parking areas and athletic field development. Funding pr°gr~ lot and ball
for landscaping, playground equipment and electrical design for the p~~n g lot and ball
ro arnmed for 2000 provides for the p g
diamond lights. Funding p gr
diamond lights and funding in 2001 will add basketball and tennis courts.
rovided $375,000 in funding for development of the park. The
~° Washington Township has p
~., remaining funding for the project is City cash resources.
«e,~
err
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-11
6. Coffman Park Redevelopment
The initial phase of Coffinan Park redevelopment was scheduled to coincide with the
construction of the Community Recreation Center (CRC). Master planning for the park has
been completed. The Master Plan identified the park components of the redevelopment with
the associated costs, which has enabled a phasing of the redevelopment based on funding
levels.
Funding programmed through 2000 will complete the implementation of the Coffrnan Park
Master Plan. 1999 funding will allow for the development of the pond area near the
Community Recreation Center, continued lawn development, and a walkway from the
shelterhouse to the CRC. The redevelopment will be completed in the year 2000 with the
construction of two additional tennis courts, the addition of a water play area, rehabilitation
of the existing shelter house and restrooms and the addition of a "shell" for the community
stage.
The project is funded by City cash resources.
~~,,_...w.~
07/15/999
T:U'ER~DKP~ZO-04
4-12
.,~
0
...
7, Post Road/I 270 Overuass Widenin
'" art of their I-270 widening project, was
The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), as p
larining to raise the height of the Post Road/I-270 overpass. This project, in conjunction
p y roaches.
with ODOT's project, widens the overp f the m oj~thand the City has paid the additional
ODOT is completing the vcndemng as part p
design and construction costs associated with the widening.
The contract between the City and ODOT for this project cheduled to be completed in Ot
awarded the construction contract in July 1998 and it is s
~' 1999.
The project has been funded by existing City cash resources. Any additional funding
requested, based on the completed project, will utilize existing'resources.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc 4-13
~.
8. Woerner-Temnle/Rings Road Connector
This project includes the construction of the Woerner-Temple/Rings Road extension from
Emerald Parkway, east to I-270 and from the western property line of the "ThomaslKohler
site" through to Avery Road. The project also includes the construction of the remaining
1,100 feet of Packwood Drive and the intersection modifications at Avery and Rings Roads.
The construction includes curbing, landscaping, sidewalks, bike paths, street lighting, traffic
signals, and traffic control measurers. The portion of the roadway from Emerald Parkway
east to I-270 will only be placed in service when the portion of Rings Road located between
Emerald Parkway and I-270 is discontinued as a public through street and the remainder of
the roadway is completed through to Avery Road.
The construction contract was awarded in July 1998 and the roadway is scheduled to be
opened in August 1999. Only one right-of--way case remains unsettled. It is anticipated that
agreement will be reached in the near future. Sufficient funds are available in the project
fund.
The project will be funded utilizing City cash resources, contributions from developers that
were required by the zoning text for the Balgriffen and Sandy Corners developments and the
issuance of voted general obligation bonds. Once private improvements have been
constructed, a portion of the annual debt service obligations will be retired by service
payments in lieu of taxes that will be received from the Woerner Temple TIF authorized by
City Council in May 1998.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-14
w
9. T2~n¢s Road/I 270 Overpass Widenin
This roject includes widening of the Rings Road/I-270 ovlrpas~n~ to rep ace the d k
p ortahon ODOT) p
approaches. The Ohio Department of Transp ~
on the existing overpass and has agreed to widen the he additional c onstructon costs
replacement project as long as the City agrees to pay t
associated with the widening. The widening will provide additional capacity that will be
needed in the future and for connection with the Woerner-Temple/Rings Road realignment
and the widening of Rings Road east to Frantz Road.
r the ro' ect is scheduled to be completed in 1999. Th t fi~o Og The
The design fo p J
construction was previously programmed f d ana ~b be coobd nated with the completion
construction schedule has not been estabhshe
of the Post Road bridge widening.
The roject will be funded with City cash resources, unless other sources can be obtained.
P
0
~r 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-15
10, Tuttle Crossin Widenin
This public infrastructure project includes the widening of Tuttle Crossing to a four-lane
boulevard from the City's corporation limits to Wilcox Road. The widening and extension
of Tuttle Crossing was identified as a high priority project in the Southwest Area Plan and
the Southwest Area Traffic Task Force.
..The Franklin County Engineer has agreed to participate in this project. The City will fund
the right-of--way acquisition and non-roadway improvements such as, landscaping and street
lighting and Franklin County will fund the design and roadway construction. The Franklin
County Engineer is expected to finalize the design in 1999 and construct the project in 2001.
The City will acquire the right-of--way during 2000.
The City's share of the project will be funded with available cash resources.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-16
11. Radio Svstem Improvements
This capital project provides for-the next step in the advancement of the City's radio
oals for this project. The first is the
communications abilities. There are three primary g
'~ expansion of the radio system from a single transmitter site to a two antenna site system to
improve reception the azea along the Scioto River in the eastern parts of the City. The
second goal is to increase our channel capacity to accoemm~odo e o fmcrig o ~x sting
system users and overall growth of the city through the t gY
y four channels. The third is the renovation and upgrade to the 911 Communications Center
to accommodate increased activity levels.
The project is being funded with $1,011,000 in voted general obligation bonds and existing
City cash resources. The debt issued relates to equipment physically located at the Justice
Center.
07115/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc 4-17
12. Community Recreation Center Expansion
One of City Council's 1998 goals that was established during the goal setting workshop in
March 1997 was to begin the process for expansion. of the Community Recreation Center
(CRC). The Administration was directed to begin the process of evaluating and
programming the elements to be included in the expansion, establishing a financing plan and
a time schedule for the expansion, and complete design work. Based on this direction,
planning and design was completed in 1998. City Council reviewed and approved the
schematics for the expansion in June 1998 and the construction contract was awarded in
September.
The expansion, scheduled for completion in late 1999 early 2000, will consist of a blackbox
theatre, community hall, arts and crafts classroom, teen area, senior area, expanded fitness
area and additional administrative offices.
The project is being funded by $3,998,000 in voted general obligation bonds issued in
November 1998, with the remaining balance being funded with existing City resources.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-18
13. Parkwood Drive
This roject is included as part of the description for the Woerner-Temple/Rings Road
P
Connector project. It will be completed in conjunctio~nt Wiroject duet the fact the poject
Road Connector projectthe ~ mas/Kohlerr T'IF Fund. p
will be funded through
The construction contract was awarded in July 1998 an o land that will be developed with
opened in August 1999. The project will provide access
Class-A office buildings.
,~
1
~,»
~.
07!15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-19
14. Emerald Parkway-Sawmill to Hard
As part of the 1995 Schottenstein rezoning, the City is committed to reimburse the developer
the difference between constructing afour-lane boulevard and athree-lane roadway. The
project is contingent upon the development of the site included in the rezoning. The City's
contribution is required when the project is completed. The project has been designed, but
no time frame has been established for construction.
The funds have been programmed for the construction to occur in 2000 to ensure funds are
available in the event the project is completed by the developer.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-20
15. Averv Muirfield Drive/LJ S 33 Interchange Improvements
This project involves the modification of the Avery-Muirfield Drive interchange, including
deck widening and ramp widening; the widening ofAvery-Muirfield from the interchange
to Perimeter Drive, adding one lane in each direction; adding a lane from Perimeter Drive
to Post Road; and installing a closed loop signauly 1999 The design was completed in 1998
and the construction contract was awarded m J y
The design has been funded with City cash resources. The construction will be funded with
an $8 million loan through the Ohio Department of Transportation's State Infrastructure
"~ Bank (SIB) program, $1 million of City cash resources and $500,000 from the City's
Permissive Tax Fund. The additional engineering services required throughout the
construction of the project will be funded with cash resources.
a~ The City is the first community in Central Ohio to participate in the SIB program. Utilizing
this funding source will result in savings of at least $500,000 over the term of the loan and
'~' allow the City's voted debt authority to be utilized for other roadway projects.
~.
~,.
ar 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-21
16. Rims Road Improvements
This project provides for improvements to Rings Road, including the construction of a four-
lane boulevard with curb and gutter, bikeway, sidewalk, and street lights to align with the
Woerner Temple/Rings Road connector project. It also includes signalization at the
intersection of Rings Road and Blazer Parkway, the modification of the median on Blazer
Parkway and signalization at the intersection of Blazer Parkway and Park Center Circle.
This designed construction will be funded by service payments in lieu of taxes to be received
as the result of a Tax Increment Financing Agreement entered into with Duke. The TIF will
be anon-school district T]F resulting in reimbursement period of approximately 20-25 years.
The City has also received $300,000 from the Franklin County Engineer for this project. The
right-of--way acquisition is being funded by City cash resources. The majority of the R-O-W
purchased will be used as open space or potentially sold. Five properties were purchased "in
total" because the damage to the residual would have been significant. It was determined to
be more cost effective to acquire 100% of the properties.
The project was designed in 1998 and the construction contract was awarded in April 1999.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-22
17. Emerald Parkwa ~xtensiuu ~ I Gl llllaava Y _ _ . . __
ublic im rovement consists of constructing an additional 2,30 Dave andtending
This p P at perimeter
Coffinan Road as new four lane boulevard street beginning
at Shier Rings Road.
Major improvements associated with this new street mane boulevard street with curb and
Rings Road with turn lanes and signalization; a four 1
tter; a 330 foot span, five lane bridge over U.S. 33/S ikewals.landscaped median and
shoulders; public utilities which include; sidewalks and Y
traffic studies, design, surveying,
In addition, this improvement includes planning,
eotechnical investigations, noise analysis, traffic control, cost estimates, erosion and
g t of-wa lat, rivate utility
sediment control, right-of--way and esseme~ntdaagp~enant o the completion of this project.
coordination, and other activities nece ary p
Design for the project is being completed during 1999 anamm d for 2000.pT ~dgn and
2000, but may occur in 1999. The construction is progrcash resources and voted general
right-of--way acquisition costs will be funded by City
obligation bonds will be issued to fund the construction for this project.
The completion of this project and the Emerald Parkway Extension -Shier Rings to
Innovation are critical to the City's roadway network ano ofthe C ty's effort to p ovide a
the area more attractive. The project also is a continuati
roadway that runs parallel to I-270, providing relief to that roadway.
~, -
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc 4-23
~+
18. Emerald Parkwav Extension -Shier Rings to Innovation
This public improvement consists of constructing "the gap" that will remain between
Riverside Drive and Tuttle Crossing. Major improvements include the construction of a four
lane boulevard with curb and gutter, landscaped median and shoulders, public utilities and
sidewalks and bikeways.
The design for the project is currently being completed with the design for the Emerald
Parkway Extension -Perimeter Drive to Shier Rings project. The right-of--way and easement
acquisition for this project has involved extensive discussion with American Electric Power
(AEP) because of the need to relocate their existing substation. The acquisition of the
necessary right-of--way and the relocation of AEP's substation is programmed to occur in
1999, with construction programmed for 2000.
The design, right-of--way acquisition, and relocation of the substation will be funded by City
cash resources and voted general obligation bonds will be issued to fund the construction.
.~
..
_ ~
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
~_7A ~
n 19. Service Comalex Exaansion
This ro' ect begins addressing long-term municipal facility needs identified in the Municipal
P J p Plan.
Facilities Study that was completed in conjunction a of the Directorhof Serviceand the
~' It will provide for the consolidation of the Offic
Divisions of Streets & Utilities and Grounds & Facilities at the Service Complex.
The funding for design was authorized and encumbered in 1998. The City is currently
working with the Dublin School District (the District) to come up with long-t ~e Distri is
for both the City and the District. The prri to the existing Servic Compl xgand acquiring
°~ Transportation Complex, which is adJace
an additional site and constructing a new facility for the District.
The design costs and renovation of existing facilities to meet the City's needs will be funded
~" b City cash resources. It is currently anticipated the acquisition of the new site and
y
construction of a new facility will be funded with d eb~ the debt ssued by the District. e
~. City would then make payments to the Distract to r
~,
~.
,~, 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc 4-25
20. Storm Water Imurovements
Funding over the next five years has been programmed for various improvement needs
identified in the Storm Water Management Study completed by Camp Dresser & McKee.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-26
[~°'a
k
21. Storage Tower -Southwest Area
This project projects for an additional water storage tank. in the southwest area. The tank will
be located based on the system model. The project is scheduled for design in 2000 and
construction in 2001. The design and a portion of the construction will be funded by Water
Fund cash resources with the remaining construction funded by general obligation bonds.
The annual debt service obligations will be retired by Water Fund resources.
~.
07/15/99
!~• T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-27
22. Sawmill Road/I-270 Interchange
This project is a City of Columbus project. The City of Dublin agreed to participate in the
project because of the positive impact it will have for the community. The project involves
replacing the existing interchange with a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUD. The
project is cost effective because of bringing together the left turns in the interchange at one
location, resulting in the use of less right-of--way.
This project involves a partnership including the State of Ohio, Franklin County, the City of
Columbus, and the City of Dublin. Dublin has executed an agreement with Columbus which
provides for Dublin's contribution to be paid to Columbus over a period of 10 years.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
4-28
Z3, Tuttle Crossing Extension -Wilcox Road to Ave~y Road
This project involves the extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard from its existing
r terminus at Wilcox Road to Avery Road. It would involve the construction of a four
"' lane boulevard street with curb and gutter, public utilities, street lighting, sidewalk
and bikeway and landscaping. The alignment of this roadway is currently being
reviewed.
The design is currently programmed for 2001, right-of--way acquisition in 2002 and
construction in 2003. The design will be funded with City cash resource and funding
'~ for acquisition and construction is being reviewed and evaluated. The goal will be
to utilize voted general obligation bond; however, based on the current voted debt
funding that will be utilized for other roadway projects, sufficient authority will not
be available. The Administration anticipates requesting the voters to approve
'~ additional authorization.
"~" 07/15/99
T:~20-04-cip~2004.doc
war
4-29
~..
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FUNDED PROJECTS
Total Debt Debt
Project Already to be Project Funding
Project c~~t ~.,,.,, e~ ,.. ..,, ~_
1 Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor 23,570,976 19,716,713 Ohio EPA loan (1) 19,716,713
Sewer Fund 4,183
Credit Enhancement 850,080
2
S
R
161-Dale to Sawmill Ci of Columbus 3,000,000
.
. 13,908,099 Cash 6,008,069
3
Scioto Bridge Federal\State funds 7,900,000
9,794,738 7,518,000 Cash 2,276,738
4
Frantz/SR 161 upgrade Voted G.O. bonds 7,518,000
4,625,323 Cash 1,914,699
5
Darree Fields development
3
508
948 Issue II fundin 2,710,624
,
, Cash 3,133,948
6
Coffman Park redevelopment
2
908
564 Washin ton Tw 375,000
,
, Cash 2,908,564
7 Post Road/I-270 overpass widening 3,951,045 Cash 3,951,045
8 Woerner-Temple/Rings connector 7,354,426 Cash 1,689,926
5,300,000 Voted G.O. bonds 5,300,000
9
Rings Road/I-270 overpass widening
4
354
000 Develo er contribution 364,500
,
, cash 3,854,000
10
Tuttle Crossing widening
6
100
000 State fundin 500,000
,
, Cash 4,000,000
Water Fund 300,000
11
Radio system improvements
1
870
000 Franklin Count 1,800,000
,
, Cash 1,870,000
12 Community Recreation Center 7,111,712 Cash 3,113,712x°
ex ansion 3,998,000 Voted G.O. bonds 3,998,000
13 Parkwood Drive 517,578 Cash 258,789
TIF service a ments 258,789
14 Emerald Parkway-Sawmill Road to 1,500,000 cash 1,500,000
Hard Road
15 Avery Road/US 33 interchange 9,905,503 Cash 1,905,503
im rovements 8,000,000 Voted G.O. bonds 8,000,000
16 Rings Road improvements 5,036,392 Cash 1,099,325
TIF service payments 3,637,067
Franklin Coun 300,000
17 Emerald Parkway extension- Perimeter 7,351,000 Cash 1,036,000
Drive to Shier Rin s Road 315,000 6,000,000 Voted G.O. bonds 6,315,000
18 Emerald Parkway extension- Shier 5,691,000 Cash 3,691,000
Rin s to Innovation Drive 2,000,000 Voted G.O. bonds 2,000,000
(1) OWDA loan to be repaid from Sewer Fund revenues.
07/15/99
4-30
r
G~i
-~
~-
ws
~.~.. q .. _ .,r.~d _._. _._
~,
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FUNDED PROJECTS
Total Debt Debt
Project .Already to be
PfOleCt Cnst Inrnrrari Inrnirrarl
Project Funding
4rotrea Gmnnnt
19 Service Complex expansion 5,648,260 Cash 2,249,260
Debt obli ation 3 399 000
20 Stormwater improvements 2,241,000 Cash 2,241,000
21 Water storage tank-Avery/Rings Roads 2,375,000 Cash(2) 875,000
G.O. bonds 2 1,500,000
22 Sawmill Road/I-270 interchange 1,200,000 Debtobtigation 1,200,000
23 Tuttle Crossing extension-Wilcox Road
to Ave Road 9,400,000 Cash aoo,ooo
Voted G.O. bonds 9 000,000
TOTAL $139,923,564 $31,547,713 $21,300,000
(2) Water Fund revenues.
,«.
07/15/99
4-31
H
W
W
O
a
E-+
P-+
U
W
w
A~
E~
U
W
ti
O
a
Q
W
Q
w
U
~ M
~p O
~ N
~ ~
w ~
O '-'
c~
N
N
N
Chi
F
0
v
C
d
d
N
Q
y
IU
C
N
O
C
O
.~
.n
.y
0
U
O
Q
e
0
w o o ^
~ ~
~
.~ ~
~ N ~
~ ~
O '~'' C
a ~ 4.
d
T O
a `
k
1 cC ~
- a'
o i
~
O ~ O
w
F
4-32
0
v,
M
M
N
'O
N
U
O
L'.
d
Q
...1
2000 - 2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
VOTED DEBT AUTHORITY
As outlined in previous CIP documents, the City received voter approval in the spring and fall of
1990 to issue voted debt for transportation improvements, P e ~ anon center~nIn effectpthese bond
construction expansion and construction of a community r es.of ublic
issues all dealt with giving the City the capacity to incur additional debt, for certain typ P
improvements, which would exceed statutorily established unvoted debt limits.
In May 1990, voted debt authority was approved for $on nrolects including a J ticepCenteeand
$7 million in mumcipal facilities construcrion/expansi p ~
$4.5 million in parkland acquisition. In November 1990, n centerbt authority was approved for
$11.5 million for the construction of a commumty recreatio
The previous CIPs outlined several factors which were emphasized during the bond issue campaigns
that were critical to the bond issues. It is important to include those factors in this year's CIP to
provide continued clarity in regard to those bond issues.
As stated repeatedly at the public meetings and within the literature, the es of 1 ublic
simply enabled the City to incur increased debt to perform spee~~e ~ ery apital
improvements. It clhadybeen menti d as parteof the transportation, parks,
improvement which
municipal facilities or community recreation center issues. When asked at the public
n meetings how the City could insure it would be able to afford a fiv t ear ca ital
identified, we indicated to th~hp~ bIWOUId only performthose projects that it had the
improvements program, and
financial capability to perform. The voted bond issues simply removed one of the
statutory limitations; that being the ten-mill limit. Obviously, the other main variable
~° which affects our ability to perform these projects, is the revenue which is available
k to pay for them.
It is clearly City Council's obligation to evaluate all of the Ci fivecaears based upon
choose those projects which need to be funded wrthm the next y
identified priorities and adopted goals and objectives.
The bond packages which were approved did not represent a referendum of which
• projects should and should not be performed by the City over the next five years.
~' The City did not list every conceivable public improvement which could be
performed, describe the merits of each project, and ask the voters to prio caleneeds
accordingly. The projects were largely illustrative based upon typ'
identified at the time.
-~
07/15/99
~"' T."~ nA_r~r~~nnadoc
5-1
Although the voted issues did not constitute a referendum on all of our capital needs,
there was a significant variation in the expressed voter support for the various
functional areas of public improvements. Of those issues subject to this public
review, transportation improvements received, by far, the highest level of voter
approval when compared to the other categories of public improvements. This is
consistent with the results of the community-wide surveys which were completed as
part of the City's Community Plan in 1987 and the Community plan update project
in March 1996. Transportation improvements were also reaffirmed as a priority
during a survey conducted as part of the preparation in developing an economic
development strategy. The categories of public improvement needs as reflected in
voting pattern, for the bond issue, received the following voter approval:
Transportation Improvement .......................................... 72%
Park Acquisition .............................................................. 66%
Municipal Facilities/Justice Center ................................. 60%
Community Recreation Center ....................................... 58%
• It was clearly represented to the public that the voted debt would be retired from
income tax revenues and not via increased property taxes. Projects would only be
implemented when it was determined that sufficient funding is available without
increasing property taxes.
As stressed when the issues were presented to the voters, we have completed or initiated those
projects for which adequate funding has been determined to be available. As pledged, property taxes
have not been increased.
The following represents a breakdown of the voted debt authority approved by the voters and debt
issued against that authority:
Transportation improvements - $34 million in authority was approved and we have
issued $25,941,470, against that authority. Several completed projects and projects
on the CIP funded project list have been transportation related; however, other
sources of revenues have been used, such as cash reserves, tax increment financing,
grants, and cost-sharing with other governmental entities.
• Parkland acquisition - $4.5 million in authority was approved and we have issued
$1,318,943 against that authority. The City also has a Parkland Acquisition Fund
which can only be utilized for the acquisition of recreational facility sites, open space
and/or parkland. In the last few years, the City has purchased a two sites totalling
3.61 acres near Shawan Falls in an effort to preserve the area, a 12 acre site along the
Scioto River for development of a community-scale park, and two sites totalling 9
acres along Post Road which will assist in providing a continuous connection of City
owned property along Post Road. These purchases have been made from the
Parkland Acquisition Fund. In addition to the purchases made from the Parkland
Acquisition Fund, several other significant purchases were made from the Capital
Improvements Tax Fund. These include: 9 acres along the Woerner-Temple
extension roadway project for the purpose of providing a greenbelt along the newly
constructed roadway; the purchase of 157 acres near Darree Fields; 21ots along the
Scioto River in an effort to preserve the river corridor; and the acquisition of f ve
properties along Rings Road which will provide the right-of--way necessary for the
Rings Road improvement project and open space.
07/15/99
T:~ZO-04-cip~2004.doc
S_7
.~.
.•
.,~.
Munici al facilities - $7 million in debt authority was approved by the voters, and we
P The voted debt issued was for
have issued $6,671,587 in debt against that authority.
land ac uisition for the Dublin Justice Center site and ea ~ e~ ss of $1 mil on for
q ose bond issue also lnclud
part of the 1998 various pure :
radio system improvements at the Justice Center.
Recreation Center - $11.5 million in authority was approved and we have
Community
utilized 100% of this authority.
1996.
received when the voters approved these issues expired January 1
The voted authority followin the
.18 2 of the Ohio Revised Code states in part ~~NO s the sixth January at an eleghon
Section 133 (n( )
under this section may be initially issued after the first day of 1996. Bonds would
election." 'This means our authority to issue "new" debt expired on January 1,
ve to be issued by that date, but bond anticipation notes would need to be issued.
not ha
133.18 (5) of the Ohio Revised Code states "The l~ction under this s ction if
However, Section m securities authorized at an ele
and (2) of this section do not apply to any g p securities,
at least ten percent of the principal amount of the securities, includin antici atory ose of
horized has theretofore been issued, or if the securities ode section flows our unu d voted
aut Tlu
. participating in any federally or state-assisted program. as at least ten percent of the amount
debt authority as of January 1,1996 to remain available as long
authorized, by category, has been issued.
5 of the Ohio Revised Code into
of voted
Our past Five-Year CIPs have 6 at least ten percent of the principal, for each categoryo remain
consideration. At January 1, 199 ,
thorit had been issued. This has allowed the unused portion of the voted authonty
au Y
available for future years.
ted the voted debt authority was obtained to reduce ed tax rate n mills to retire
As previously sta g est re uir
limit." At December 31,1998, the taxin distnct with the high q
tandin was 2.97 • We feel this millage does not adversely affect the financial health
current debt outs g urisdictions.
of the City or any of the overlapping j
' 's fan to continue aggressive roadway construction, additof fu~etro dway projects
Due to the City p ilm a 1
will be needed in the future. The administration will be comp g ears,
and re are an estimate on the amount of debt the Cit r the 2000 primary election~e y
needed p P
It is anticipated the bond issue request will be on the ballot fo
~.
~.
.r n~/IS/Q9 G_~
~,
a
rr
.rr
,~.
r
~~
~,
2000 - 2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
MUNICIPAL DEBT
This section provides information on the long-term debt obligations outstanding at December 31,
*~+ 1998, the projected long-term income tax supported debt, a calculation of the long-term debt
,~, capacity and a recap of the annual debt service obligations.
The Projected Long-Term Debt Schedule reflects that the estimated principal outstanding at the end
_ ~ of each year is within the recommended maximum amount. As discussed in Section 3, the
repayment of the low-interest loan for the construction of the Upper Scioto West Branch Interceptor
'° '~' will be made 100% from the Sewer Fund.
The Debt Service Payments Due schedule reflects that the total actual and estimated debt service
`~' obligations each year are within the actual and projected income tax revenue available for debt
retirement. The difference between the two, or the "surplus", will be used to "buy down" other
capital project costs and issue less, debt or be used to fund other capital projects.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-CIP~2004
~+' ~-1
2000-2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
LONG-TERM DEBT OBLIGATIONS
As of December 31, 1998
Paid From Income Taxes v~
Date
of Date
of Original O/S General Capital
Im .Fund S
Fund Other ~
ources 1
Issue Maturi Amount Princi al ~
Jnvoted G.O. Bonds
$0 $p $40,000
11-01-75 11-01-06 $200,000 $40,000
249
55 0 0 55,249 ""
#1 Sewer
Old Dublin Waterline 12-01-79 12-01-00
12-01-03 487,249
859,000 ,
220,000
220,000 0
0 0
0
Water Tower Construction 05-01-83
05-01-83
12-01-03 575,000 150,000 150,000
000
135
0 0
~
Post Road Waterline
ntrJPosU331mprovements
F 05-01-83 12-01-03 545,000
000
200 135,000
80,000 ,
80,000 0 0
0
ra
Glick Road Improvements 11-01-85
11-01-85 12-01-06
12-01-06 ,
590,000
240,000
240,0000 0
0
160,000
"'~
Frantr Rd. Blvd.
Road Waterline
Ave 11-01-85 12-01-06
06 383,000
000
800 160,000
320,000
320,000 0
4 0
0
ry
Municipal Bldg. Expansion 11-01-85
12-01-90 12-01-
12-01-10 ,
2,200,000
1,707,904 0
0 1,707,90
913,291 0 ,,,,,
Water Tower Constuction 12-01-90 12-01-10 1,200,000 913,291 0 197,081
1 0
Swimming Pool Construction 12.01.90 12-01-10 1,550,000 1,197,081 0 ,
392,148 0
Water System Improvements 12.01-90 12-01-10 455,000 392,148 0 862,700
1 0
Frantr Road Improvements 12.01-90 12-01-10 2,400,000 1,862,700 0 ,
351,876
1 0 `
Service Complex
Sewer Lift Station
nita
S 12.01-90 12-01-10
14 1,800,000
000
100
4 1,351,876
3,580,000 0 ,
0
0 3,580,000
25
000
ry
a
RingsBlazer Water Tower 10-15-94
10.15-94 12.01.
12-01-01 ,
,
40,000
25,000 0
0
0 ,
19 254 714 ~
Rings/Blazer Water Tower 01 01.99 07101!18 19,716,717 19,254 714 ~ r
Upper Scioto West Branch
31,684,963
1,145,000
7,425,000
23,114,963
Total ~
Unvoted S ecial Assessment Bonds
12 01-79
12.01-00
312,751 24,751 0
0 0
0 24,751
60,000 ~
Old Dublin Waterline 07.01-81 12-01-01 400,000 60,000
000
45
0 0 45,000
Phase II Sewer 09-01-87 12-01-07 95,623 ,
000
105 0 0 105,000 I
Shier-Rings Waterline
hti 10-01-92 12-01-01 165,000 ,
751
234 0 p 234,751
ng
Dublin Village Center Lig ,
Total
Voted G.O. Bonds
12-01-74
12-01-05
100,000 21,000 0
0 0
0 21,000
90,000
#1 Sewer 07.01.79 12-01-10 225,000
000
315 90,000
258,603 0 258,603 0
0
#2 Sewer
Coffman Road Extension 12-01-90
12 01-90 12-01-10
12_01_10 ,
890,000 689,609 0
0 689,609
917,788 0
Justice Center(Land)
d A 12.01-90 12-01-10 1,225,000 917,788
000
330
3 0 3,330,000 0
0
cq.
N.E. Quadrant Parklan 10-02-92 12.01.11 4,100,000 ,
,
000
420 0 0 420,00
Dublin Justice Center
10-15-94
12-01-01 780,000 ,
000
620
5
0
5,620,000 0
0
Duke Realty TIF
Community Recreation Center 02-01-96 12-01-10
12-01-06 6,615,000
690,000 ,
,
525,000 0 0
3 888
000 525,00
0
MetatecTlF
Recreation CV. Expansion
i 02.01-96
1 3,998,000
000
011
1 3,998,000
1,011,000 0
0 ,
1,011,000 0
000
403
1
ty
Commun
Radio System Improvements 10-15-98
'
10.15-98 12-01 18
12-01-07 ,
,
1,403,000 1,403,000 0
0 0
0 ,
,
7,874,000
Emerald Parkway, Phase 1 10.15-98 12-01-16 7,874,000 7,874,000
7 518 000 0 7,518 000 0
0
Emerald Parkway, Phase 2 10-15-98 12.01.17 7,518,000 000
676
33 0 23,343,000 10,333,00
Scioto Bridge ,
,
Total
0
1,070,000
Voted S ecial Assessment Bonds 10-15-94 12-01-14 1,185,000 1,070,000 0
Tuller Road
Other Lon -term Obli ations 10-01-98 10-01-OS 1,200,000 1 200 000
0
1,200,000
0
Sawmill Road/1-270 interchange
$67,865,714 $1145,000 $31968,000 $34,752,714
Totai Long-term Debt a ments in lieu of taxes.
(1) "Other Sources" include special assessment collections, real estate property taxes, water system revenues, and service p y
07/15/99
6-2
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
N
O
~ N
Q
~ W
C7 J
~ ~
a' ~
d W
_ ~ r-
Z U O N
~ m ~
W W 'o
~ ~
.O
~ ~ N
W
p ~ ~ Q
O
N . ~ Q
y
O O
N
O
Q Z
X
NaO coo
m
U W o
1--
QU c
W ~" ~
rn
}~ rn
W ~
~ ~
~ I
M
O
O
.--
v ~n o
co ~t o
~ M O
'~t' ~t O
`tt CD O
~ ~- O
M M ~
ER
'tt' O O
~ r
'~t' O
~ O
M O
I~ N
C~ M
69
M O O
~~o
~M~
~ M O
In ~'- M
00 M r-
M ~
69
I~ 'a' O
~ ~
O lM
~ N
'~t
~ i
O ~
00 M In
O N M
~ ~
O r- O
O O
~ O°
rn
~- N
M
69
O O O
O O 0p
M `ct O
0p r l(7
r r
6F}
rn ~
N O
O l1~
N ~
~ r
CO
ti
O
r
III N
O II r
~ O
~ ~
~ r
O r
•- II ~h
M
0
r
lf~
O
r
r- II I~
C
O ^
~ N
O O O M
~ ~ ~ N
O m
~ ~ ~ (0
_Q
N •X ''''
~ N r N 'O N ~
fLf ~ 'O ~ f0 f0 'O O
.~ p ~ ~ ,~ j, ,~ c
o ~ ~ N os ~ ~
(0
O-.C Q. Q. Q O ~ ~
'U ~ ~
C ~ ~C ~~ ~~ C U O
Vi
N
U ~
(~ ~
~ °
._ .C
,~, U
~ N
'a C~
c
a `~
~
U
O ~-. ~
O O_-
• O p O
~
V
C ~O O
f0
O O p O
~ C O '1 CO ~ ~
O O~ C
M O
~ O .-. ~+
p
O O O~ O ~ N
~ _C O O Lf) C E O >
N M
O
O N N ~~ ~ M O
Q~ O
~ ` fp .-. O H O O O (II i- C C
C O U O e., y0, ~
O
U
~ O'+
-+~~
~ C OM ~O~ ~ ~ O N
N
~ Q
O
00O
O C Or-'~rj >r-'_
-C
O
Ov}O~~ Q
~ ~ N
„
O
O
O
N~ N ti C
• ~ N ~
Rf
O
.
~ Y ~
~ O O C
O .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •y
C
L .fl ~ '0 t6
.~~ fA C l~. '"' ° RS O O ~
~~~ L 00'aU O
~
c'~ ~m ~ Nv- a~~~
-° a~U
_ O O
~
°' O C~~ ~~ U
a
3
3 v
o ~ oUU c
o m X
0 0>~ E a i
~~cn~QWwcn~.
C O 00 O N ~
N 0 0 0
y O O O ~
m
~ ~ N N N ~
.-. ~-.
•- N
v ~ ~
ti
O
t
a
t
.C
c
c
c
_~
c
l
r.
~ C ~O ` ~ O COO ti ~ ~ ~ M ' ~ dM ' ~
00~a?CflMON~aOO~ON
~f Cp~MONO)I~NCOOtiNCV
OI~ONd'OMNf~OMC~OM~
O r r r r
N ER
O~ O O O O O O N c~
r~t0000000 ~'
Ln(p0p~0001~ ~
CO CO 00 f~ In L(7 O 1~ ~
r'[f Opr~N~~ N
(Or~'CONM~ti
d ti
M~ O) 0 0 Cp Cp O r 00 O O N M~ 0 0 0 0 0
O N ,~ M ti N~ CO ~ CO ~ CO O r o 00 O O O O
CO CO CO ~ O O O M O O) f~ dw O? O CO C~ 00 ~t O O
MOCOCOrI~M00'a'~d-l`~O~~Ir pMp~~N
O 00 07 N ~ O '~Y' N f~ O) O '~t
Or r rr MCDMCON~r~CONM
N Ef3
O ~ ~
Cp r ~
O
M
p0') O O
~d' ti~ N
n
D
O
n
M
ti
M
OI
M O N I~ r r' ~ N~ pp O M N 00 In 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO N CO p Op 00 MOM ~, M~ {,() ti 0 0 0 0 0 0
to N O O M C10 00 00 M M 'ct f ' 00 to CO CO 00 d~ O O
N to ~ O N N Cfl 00 C4 N N CO 00 ~ ~ O CO 00 ~ ~ In
O 00 CA M d' O ~' N ti ~ M~ M COO N o r ~t CO N M
O r r N ~-
N Efl
U
a
~ W
W ~
W to
Oz
d' ~-
O ~ Q
N J ~
I-
N Q
U~
~ W
Q ~
W ~
} W
~_
~~ ~~~ ti ti COO ~ N COO N d~ O O O O O O
'ct M N 07 00 ~ In 00 ~ r O ~ r OD M ~ 00 Ln lA O
r r N~ M 00 r CA CO `7 ~~ 00 ~' ti lp r 00 O ti O
OOOM'~f O~NI`OCO'~tOONOCO00NOti
Orrr Nr rMCOC7CONNr~N r
N Efl
~t COOttO~C00)LnNOOMf~IS)
~ rOCONI~I~~tCO00CO00C000
~• r O ~ ~t O N 1~ 'dam N ~ ~ CO ~
O 00 CO O In CO ti O O ~ ~ to M '~t ~'
OOOM~rLnM000f~~rON
Orrr Nr rMCOMCON
N Efl
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 00
~ ~
r '~
ti M~~ to N O CO r 1~ O M f~ LO O O O O O O C
O N N r CA N CO N CO CO f~ 0 0 C0 N
r1~00r1~'~tCOthM~~00M1n tf)
OlnO)MI~MNr'~ ~1``7~ON 1~
000~1'~NOMMrMCOMCON r"
O N r r N
r EA
O N pp M pp O 0p M r- d' O 0 0 'd' 0 0 0 0 0 0(
O In I~ r l(') OO I.n O Lf) (O M r 00 ~f'
CONtir00I~MN00Mh~~
00 M~ O rn c~i ~ N 1~ O d' O) N N ~t
Orrd' V MCDMOO~M~N`a'
CA (y r r N r
r
OI
O
CO
O
rn
O
M
O
CO
M
d'
O) ~'
M M
N M
CO NFR
pOp N
N ~
O O
t` M
M
AIM
M
O
N
IO
N
^ ^
.-.
r' N v
C
C ~
O O) O
C
'N
~ ~ >
~. X ~ N C
r ~ .~ ^ N .C ~ ~-.
~ 0 C~ C~ O N N O N~ U ~ O~ 'N O
~ j O C O C ^ '+' U U ~~ ~' ~ N~ L C O
O E N +~ O ~ V U O O r C •L N fC3 N
c U ~~ X .J ~ f04 J O~ d O~~ N O~~ X~
° E a° LW ~ LU v oV--OC` Q-3 3 °~ rn
U o E ~ a3 c~°a.4?d °~~~ rnai~ ~ a~i `m c`a ~ vi
3 rn~ o~j~ OU caU c c~ >,o~ Ldn"U o
E~~ c°i m ~ ~U°' ~ ~ E o o Z'~ m a~ a~ U °~ ~
°~ ~ °~ °~~ c~ v LLI ~ ~ ~ °=a a~ 3 o E E a~i ~ o
tq ?~ fd CL O (0 O O O O O U N> O
~cn~u..cncnU-~z-~UUcn~Qcn~wwcn~-~-
O 1~
r OMO
~~ N
O .-.
"" N
O M
.fl ~
N O
,> O.
ca ~
N
~ O
v_
> ~
m °
L
L
cXa °~
++ y:
a~ ~
U N
C 'O
O
.~
°
ai
a~
N
C
ai a
7 C
'd (G
'OO O Q.
O
G ~ •C
O ~ '~-
~~ a
p~ O ~
~ U ~
O •~ N
V N O
+, U
C
vOi O
~ (-
° °' E
f° E ~
Q W O
.-. ^
O
r N z
rn
~_
N
O
2000 -2004
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL 1 RP ~~ME~TUING OGRAM
NON-MAJOR P
es have been established for several key functional categories which the A~nuustratron has
~„ Guidehn
utilized in projecting the non-major capital needs. These are summarized as follows:
Park Development
e nei borhood park development priority is based upon the timing of subdivision build-
. Th gh
~„ out.
Evaluate the adequacy of active/athletic facilities in the community and the neighborhood
~.
~„ parks.
oint nei borhood and community Parks with other
"" Identify opportunities to develop j ~ ton Township).
.~. governmental jurisdiction (i.e. Dublin City Schools and Washing
~. Bikewa System Improvements
Identify connections and/or additions to the bikeway system which provide an alternate
y nei hborhoods, community facilities. and commercial
transportation s stem linking g
~- destinations.
~~ Bikeways are included as part of the City's major public roadway projects.
• 'ate locals stem design with other governmental jurisdictions such as the Mid-Ohio
Coordm Y ORPC)~ the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Regional Planning Commission (M
`~' and other appropriate regional efforts.
Identify the connections and/or additions that can be constructed by developers as part o
private development.
Fleet and Eauipment Mana¢ement
~,,, Replacement Strate~Y
~" Fleet replacement is based upon its economic life.
«. maximize the City's return on its investment.
Stnve to
~. Focus maintenance efforts on heavy equipment with a long life expectancy.
•
Minimize investment in parts inventory.
Minimize fleet down time.
w.
ns 07/15/99
T:~20-04-CIP~2004 7_1
Additions of Fleet and Equipment
• Maintain existing service levels in areas of new growth (public and private).
• Add to or expand existing service levels.
• Shift a contracted service to an in-house service (i.e. sign shop).
Annual Street Maintenance Pro ram
• Investment for street resurfacing should be based on anticipated life of the asset.
• The establishment of a comprehensive pavement management system will help to ensure
acceptable levels of service in the most cost-effective manner.
• The City will evaluate the. need to increase pavement maintenance in future years.
Computer Hardware and Software
• Upgrade outdated hardware and software systems to remain functional.
• Coordinate functional and informational requirements across departments and divisions.
As identified, specific budget requests will be included in the annual capital budget and a final
review and evaluation made by City Council as part of the Operating Budget review process.
07/15/99
T:~20-04-CIP12004
~-2
.~,
f
.~
arr
~,
I-
U
W
O
a.
~'"'
Z
w
G
W
Z Q
J ~
m a
~ ~ O
O
Q ~ N
}'n..p
UUN
~_~
Q
~U
f~
O
i
^.
~U
d'
O
O
O
a~
a
W ~ N~~ O O~ O~ N O O C
W~ ON(Oln CVO NOS
m W N CO 'cF N 'ct N
U
~ Q
m
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q 00 ~ ~ O
O
W N N N
m
J OOIf)00000 t171~000
QO ~NNCfl COOO0N0 O
F- ~ ONOr Nch N O
Q 00 CV CD .-- (~j '~7
F-
OOO~pO00~tn00000
o u'~rnc~~ 00~ N
N
ppOp~000~1n00000
o ~n ao c~ ~ Cfl ~ N
N
NI II~IOIMI~IOIOI~I~IOIOINIOI~
NI IIpI~IMI~IOIOIOI~IOINIOIOI~
NI IIOI~IMI~IOIOINIOIOIOIOIOI~
~I II~INIOI~I~INIr"I~IOIOIOIOI~
OIO~O~O~O~O~O~O-~O~O
Quo°I-
~ W ~ W
} ~
Q
~ ~
~ O
Q ~ y
~L
Q C ~ ~ m ~ (~
U Z Z o `~ ~ N~ c
~ U O Z o ~~~ o> 'rn ~~
~ ~aZ o N ~ ~ ~ c~ o
rl p ~ O ~.. ~ E c~ ca ~..S ~ =v
~mo-Ew
Z aw~ ~ v ~ cn N c~`~s•c ~ 3 ~ ~ ~
W ~~ •~ o` •~ s o s cu o ~~~ o
~ ~ ~ m ~ co m E cu c ~~ c
Z m ccod~_s ~ c a~ o~ ~
Z o rn L ~. o a~ c
~~ Q-~d~~NHUm~WfnmU
~ ~ ~
W Jp .--NCh~
NN ~NMr-e-e-~
LL. 0000
QQ O ~Z ~~QQo0rn000ON'V'Q
UUc°~I °~°~ooooo0
7-4
01010
~~
F""
H
U
W
O
a
F--
z
w
w
zo
~~
ma
~g
o-
wQ
o ~..
~Q
c~ U
7-5
U
W
a
Z
W
W
Z~
m a
~g
o-ter
~ J O
O ~ N
UU°
~ o co o o
v
r
~
n
rn
O~
n
N
o o o o
n-- o ~n
N o
M ~n
~ ~n
~ o
n v
M o
~ ~n
p o ~n o o
O ~n
p ~n
N o ao
tO ~
0 n~
o0 o
0 o o
O
~ . .
- 1 ~ N ~ .
- ~ ~ )
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O g 0 0 0 0 0 O
O
r t~ ~ ~
O
~t
r O
~
n (O
O
O 0
n
N 0
O
N 0 0 0
n 0 to
N O
M O
< to
p O
~ ~}
M O
'~ lf
O ) O
M to O O
~ lA
CO ~A
OO O N
CO to
0 to
ap O
0 O
0 O
N
r N N ~ ~
r
r
~
CD
O
M O
ln O
O tl')
N O
ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
r
N
r
r O
O
O
M O
tf) O
O In
~ 0
ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 op tf~ U") 0 0 0 M
r N CO O N O r
r
0
M 0
In 0
O 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
r
N
r
N O
,fi to
r 00
~
r
O
M O
A O
O O O
O O O O O N O O N O O O O O O O
~ O p
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
N
CO M
M
l CJ
N O
r. C O
O O O
r O O O
n- O O
N O
N O
~ O O
N ~
M O
~ ~
O O
M l f)
n 0 0 0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
e a
-
N r
O
r
~
N O
tf) ~t
a0 O
0 O
tn N
n 0
a~ 0
N 0
tn 0 0 0 0 0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r
r
~"•
M
r
N
r O
~ M
H
U ~'-
~ O O O c O N
O ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M
Q' M O
~ CO
r
i
Z
~
c
~
v
Z c ~ Rf U
Z f° _
'O
gy N CC y 4.
d t
' fw~4
~ N
C (
p
y 0
~ 0
~ C
W
Y
~ C
A
E
U C
~
~
Y
E
~
Y
•Y
~
~
C
~
~
(p
f0 t
~ ~C6
~ J
~ C Y ~ f0 ~ d N ~ Q. 'Y ~ m N f0 ~ .~ d ~
C O ~ F -
L
Y 3
a~ c
p ~
f0 ~
~• ~
~ ~
d d L
a d
" c
~• n.
O v
~ m'
~ ~ ~
~
~• -
~ Y
~ Y
m S
a~• L
- Y
m O
E Z
c ~
L ~
O ~
y
F O
-
~ ; p U C Z O ~ Y
f9 ~ ~ C O d U O ~ ~ C ~
a C O Y
~ C O C7
~
N
~
~
~
v
L
m
L
~ m m ~ _ ~ s a ~. c ~ ~ ~ ~ m ? L ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ U ~ d. m ~ ~ c
L C : Y f0 ~ = C '
3 C E C N t O U O ~ C p0 ' O ~
w ` C N
' E ~ m ~ C ~ C N
L
¢ m at - o F - ¢ ~ xc n 3c n oi i ~ ~ o m in ¢
c ~ ~ = Y ~ ~ YC i~
r
O N
O M
O r
O
O
O N
O N
O M
O
O N
O M
O ~t t
O C1C
O O
O n0
O 0
O 0 0 N M r N N M ~L f) r N
~
~
g
e
g'
~C
m
~~
a>
00
rn
0
rn
0
rn
0
rn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 O
0 r
0 0
0 0
r 0 0
N 0
N 0
M 0
M 0
M 0
M 0
~F' 0
Cf
~ ~
j
l l o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r
0
c
O
U
0
m
c
co
Q
p ~AOONO~Otn O~
~r.~NMMM~ M
W
~ m W
O
O
O
pp
m
p o000000o O
~
0
O
~ ~°
W N
m
t1)OtnNOt1')O~
tititnNMMM~ N
ti
Q~ M
~ O p
O
~„
t n N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti
N
r r
O
O
N
w n t n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r ~'
N
=,mas M
O
O
N
~ O O O O O f ~. O
r M
~ N
O
~ O
N
z w l n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M
~
r N
ar O
O
N
tr1 O In N O t!') to In
r N~ N M M r 0
ti
N
O
O
O
N
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
N
.mr O `_ r
O
O
r
ail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
VJ
OQo
Q
LL }
'^
VJ
°"` U t'
w ~ a~
O ~' ~ ~
~r ~ Z
F- F- ~ ~ N U ~
N, 6
~" C O N
.
J
W W D.. ,,,,
N N ~ ~ ~ O
O ~ F-
„" p p~
U Qm~~m-~vuci
`'
co ~
~ ~ ~E~~~
~m
Z p Z ~ a~ .N o .N ~ a~
V ~ N ~ _ ~ ~ U
;rr ~ J ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ -C- :~
U N
~
y
~ c~UaUJ~ i
ma
~
,ur 'a'
p rNrrNM~'O ~
O Q N W O
Z p p p p~ 0 0 0 0 0
o
*"" }'ao ~ rnrnrnoooo ~
7~7
1--QOO O
~. UUN
c
.~
C
C
.C
d
C
c
C
C
.£
z
c
F
c
c
L
~. _ _
U
W
O
a
H
z
w
W
O
CL'
a
~_
J
H
a
Q
U
i
i
i
i ;i
i
I~
.~
i
;
i
c
.~
C
u
r r ~ " N r O
~ 0 0 O O O
Q O O O r ~
Q O O O O ~
ti
0
c
c
c
0
.~
U
O
m
(0
C
C
7-8
F-
U
W
O
W
~"'
Z
W
W
Zp
J ~
?a
~ ~ ~
~ J O
O ~ N
Sao
0
UUc°v
r
~ v
~
0 N
0 M
0 r-
0
ti
O M
0
ti
O ~
0
pp
O V
0
Op
O N
0
0
O M
0
0
O ~f
0
0
O r
0
~
0
O r
0
~
0
O N
0
~
0
O M
0
~
0
O d'
0
~
0
O ~
0
~
0
O h
0
~
0
O OO
0
0
O r
0
~
O N
0
r'
O M
0
~
O ~
0
~
O ~
0
~
O (O
0
~
O ~
0
M
O r'
0
d'
O N
0
~
O
c
0
:r
f0
U
O
(0
n ~
A ~
n
r CO
~ Q
a
N
f0
a
v
0
0
0
m
t
a~
a
a~
E
c
a~
LL
7-9
U
w
O
d
I-
Z
w
w
Z~
J ~
m d
~ ~
~ - '~t
W_!O
Q O
O~,N
~o
_ o
UUc°~
w
~ m W
00~
m
D
Z
Oo
~. O
W N
m
J ~
~ O
O°
~, O
'~t
O
O
N
M
O
O
N
N
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
CA
r
~ ~
0 Q O
d W ~
z
O
U F-
W d
~U
d~
w
0
Ll.. O
wz
o ~ o 0 0
~ o
N M M O
0 0 0 °
0 o
M M
o ~ o 0 0
i
N M O
0 0 0 O
` ~
~ O O O
`
O O O
` ~
O 0 O
l
f') 0
0 M
~- N
X 0 0 M
0
0
~ N
1 0 0
0
0 M
~ N
O O O O
~ a
~ ~
.~ ~ Q
~
Q J
~ C
O f-
o o O
~ ~
~
u~ ~,
c
a
c ~ ~
~
`~ ~ a
~
U ~
+-~
U C O
~ ~
m
F-
U
W
~'
d
Q.'
O
Q
Z
Z
W
H
z
O
m
H
0
w
r ~ ~ O
~ O O O
~ rn o
ti
0
7-10
~.
rt~
wr
rr
+r
ws
r
s~
ur
,.
..
H
U
W
O
H
Z
W
W
Zp
J ~
CO ~
~ ~ O
O
~ ~ N
d. O
O
UUN
~-11
c
.~
E
v
'c
.~
c
c
c
z
.~
c
t
r
1`r