122-99 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dayton Legal Blank Co Form No 30043
Ordinance No..122.-99 Passed
An ordinance providing for a change in zoning for 2.039 acres located on
the northeast corner of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Paul G. Blazer
Parkway, From: PCD, Planned Commerce District, To: PCD, Planned
Commerce District. (Tuttle Crossing PCD, Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy
Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Parkway/Case File No. 99-1082)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, ~ of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A")
situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PCD, Planned Commerce
District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-
70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and
amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said
real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
• Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest
period allowed by law.
P d this day of
ayor -Presiding Officer
Attest:
Cler f Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
1 hereby certify that copies of this OrdinancelResolution were pasted in YfiE
City of Dublin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the 4f~io Revised Code.
Q~p~;, rk of Council, Dublin, Ohio
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Dorton [.etal BW~k Co. Fmm Na 9003
Ordinance No..122-99 Passed
An ordinance providing for a change in zoning for 2.039 acres located on
the northeast comer of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Paul G. Blazer
Parkway, From: PCD, Planned Commerce District, To: PCD, Planned
Commerce District. (Tuttle Crossing PCD, Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy
Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Parkway/Case File No. 99-1082)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, _ of the elected members concurring:
Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached map marked Exhibit "A")
situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PCD, Planned Commerce
District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-
70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances) the City of Dublin Zoning Code and
amendments thereto.
Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous and affected
property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission,
Exhibit "C", are all incorporated into and made an otlicial part of this Ordinance and said
real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith.
Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest
period allowed by law.
Passed this day of , 1999.
s.y
Mayor -Presiding Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council
Sponsor: Planning Division
Q~~oa M~a o~~ g D~
i i a~~ fv~ ~ v4~ SP c
3 a I I ~ M` E°arei~~
a ~ ~ v. ` ~ xn ~'~t P2
INNOVATION jj ~ ~'LA ~ ~ ~I ` I F, ~A1'ERFO
~ ; ~ wA GLEN ~ ~ r
' ~ ~ J:: : a LN ~ ~ 1f~IRION ~
~ d BECKLEY boa A
~ ~i OI,DEN$URGH RAY ~
4~~C ~ ui LONGI'IEtP DR
ewu xy ~ ~~~LIIEMOA,,_ ~ ~ ~ GRANDVIEp DR
T ~ 1 ~ '"`''~qGG (~9 ~ t7
A ~ c
a 't1 '~.f- a~ ~
~ q`c
SCOTIA CT ~
w TWP
GAELIC CT W v°o
A U t%~
a °
Ir
. ~
~ E„ ~ 1 •bv~ ~bx y.,~x
rn a ~ r" x
~A
~C ~
® R. ~ ~ CREEK ~ «a~ 00
U
° HAYMAI~R x
~ DRGLESEA~GS RD ~~ELD DR
w ~ ~ ~ a
1 ~I.D ~ s. W a so
R m ~ ~ GLENDON ~ - ~ a a CT ~OR~ S1,
RICHGROVE a Z ~ ~
d LN ~ ~ fiERT B
ao o ~ a' ~ s.~ ~ a~ ~w ~ B CT
~~~f V N ~ p ~
URY LN ` _ (~titi`\ ~ ' pG 4~ ~ $ ~ CENTER AVE BED CT ~ 9 d
r w
~o ° CT ,:l SITE RD ,
T~ d
~
~ ~ J ~ ;t1iSl~-d x
L ~ ~ TUTTLE CRO IxG r[ E q- ~
d
TUTTLE RD
,__,-1
CRO NG
~ M Al + ,
~ ( rw~.
~ ~ ro~ ~ ~ ~ UN C~
t-'C7 1 ,
o ~
v ~ a
OLDE DUBLIN CAS ~
PL DR ~
NfOODS DR C?LUMBUS ~
~7 ~ ti~ v
HILLIARD
a iooo zooo ~ d d
~ _o
SCALE IN FEET C
1 IN EdUAIS 1200 FT 99-1082 ~
Rezoning Application ~
5220 Paul G. Blazer Pkwy.
Kinko's Copy Store ~w
~ f.; ~ ' v w ~
I i i ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ -
~ r~
~ ~
~ ~
S ~ ~ LI ~
~ w:
~ i
RI PAD PUD
PCD ~ A~ o
~ ~
OLR g~ ~
OLR TWF
C:D
SO
R C
S o
° ~ r=. P OLR
LR -
~ ~ a D PU ~
~O
a P
' -°r~ _ PCD 4~0 0
-3 11~' - a ~ ~
a
D
f , v
- ~~f
~rJ
J
P ~ ~ R-7
CD c ~ SITE
R- ~ _ ~
-d
~
U: '
0
o
C~LUMB S
HIL I~,aRD
d
~ X99-1082
~ Rezoning A,pplicatio
5220 Paul G. Blazer Pkwy.
Kinko's Copy Store
EXHIBIT "13"
REZONING APPLICATION
(Code Section 153234)
EXPIRE
CI'I't' OE DliIjLI\
Ordinance No. /a) ~ 9~
5800 Shier Rings Road
Dublin; Ohio 43016 (ilt Council 1st Readin 1 d
PhonelT'DD:614/761-6550 y g ~
Fax: s,4ns,-s5ss City Council Public Hearing
City Council Action
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
? Amount R=:ceived:~~~Ci Application No:~~ P&Z Date(s): 1~~~~ P&Z Action:
Rc~eipt i'to: MIS Fee No: Date Received: ~o`,~ ~ ~ ~ Received By C'~
Type. et RequesC
? PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATIONS - PLG:ISE PRINT -
ANDTHIRTEEN (13) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION and
CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION
? Composite Plan(Code Section 153.G58j
? Preliminary Development Plan (Code Section 153 C56j
? Other (Dscribe) _
1. PROPERTY INr'ORP~IATION _
TAX ID NO/ 273-005334..' Parcel Size: 2 ~ 039+
I~ DISTRIGT PARCEL NO: (Acres) _
Pr~pertyAddr,~s: Tuttle Crossing Blvd.
i !
I~ Prop,_~rry Locaeon Northeast corner of Tuttle Crossing Blvd. and Blazer Parkway
1 Side n1 SUCx~t: (N. v. E, w) North side of Tuttle Crossin Blvd.
1~~arest Intersection: Blazer Parkway and Tuttle Crossing Blvd.
Gi:;tance Irom Noarest Intersection: 0' N, S, E, W from N,.arest Intersection i
Existing land Use/Development: Vacant ~ r, ~ ~V]
Pr<q,u~,41 Land U::r1D,+w~lol~m~.~nt: Restaurant and Commercial/retail uses. ~ ~
R,~zc•~nin,l Al;l~li,::~ti<;n ~1Y ~ 'r'~~%"In G~3~~~ 1 ~
EXHIBIT "B"
Current or Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: No. of Acres to be Rezoned:
PCD PCD 2.039±
STATEMENT:
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and potential future land use character of the vicinity.
The proposed revision will allow needed support activities for the surrounding office
activities. The existing PCD allows the proposed restaurant on the parcel, and the
request is to permit commercial retail activities that would provide missing services/
uses that the workers and staff within the surrounding office buildings need on a daily
basis. The area has already been developed with restaurants/hotels, offices, and the
mall, and the proposed amendments will provide needed services and uses not found in
the area.
STATEMENT:
State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the Dublin Community Plan. The Community Plan indicates tha
the subject area is a mixed employment area which the PCD District has been successful
in achieving at this time. However, there is still an unmet need for ancillary office
retail and services in the area. The proposed revision will allow for a small area of
these uses on the 2.039 acre tract. The uses/services proposed within the text amend-
ment are in keeping with the mixed employment use plan, as the size of the lot is small
and the potential uses as outlined in the text are of a nature that will serve the
employees within the surrounding offices and will prevent unnecessary vehicular trips
in and out of the area.
PREVIOUS APPLICATION?
Has an application for rezoning the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES ? NO ?
IF YES, WHEN?
State the basis of reconsideration: ~
I'
r+w 1
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS COMPOSITE OR PRELIMINARY PLAN ATTACHED? N
/ i
IF A PLANNED DISTRICT IS REQUESTED, IS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEXT ATTACHED? YES ® NO ? 1p ~,O
II. PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
® 14 COPIES OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Legal description of the property to be rezoned consists of page(s).
PLAN REQUIREMENTS: O
~I 14 SETS OF PLANS TO SCALE (NOT GREATER THAN 24' X 36') SHOWING:
a. The silo and all land 500 foot boyond tho boundaries _
b. North arrow and bar scalo G i - %
c. Existing conditions (Rcsads, buildings, veyetalion,topography, jurisdictional boundariati, ulil ties, e
d. Proposed Uses (R~~cdionc+I transportation syslcam, densities, p of dwellings, building/unit tyl s, sq aro footage;s, parkland'op~:ai . ~acr~, t;: )
e. Existing and prohoscd zoning district boundarios
t
Rr~zonin~~ Application PLA-108 Dato 09%28/93
EXHIBIT "B"
f. Size of the site in acres square feet; and
g. All property lines, street rights-of-way, easements, and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries.
~ 14 SETS OF REDUCED DRAWING(S) (NOT GREATER THAN 11' X 17")
~ 14 COPIES OF COUNTY OWNERSHIP MAP: (NOT LESS THAN 8'/x" X 11"AND NOT MORE THAN 16" X 20")
Showing contiguous property owners within 500 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned.
Iil. CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS
List all neighboring property owners within 300 feet from the perimeter of the area to be rezoned. Such list to be in accordance with the County Auditor's
current tax list. (Use additional sheets as necessary.) Labels formatted for Avery 5160 may be submitted as labels or on a computer disk. J~
PROPERTY OWNER
(not Mortgage Company or Tax Service) MAILING ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE r~rr
See attached list
L~~
a..ii
Rczz~nirtg Application PLA-108 Date 09/8/99
I'a s c ? . +1 S
EXHIBIT "B"
~,„IV. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name of Current Property Owner(s): Venator Group Specialty Inc .
Mailing Address: 233 Broadway, New York, NY 10279
(Street, City, State, Zip Code)
Daytime Telephone: Fax
Name of Contact Persona, (ex. Attorney, Architect, etc): Ben W. Hale, Jr. / Jackson B. Reynolds III
'Please complete the Agent Authorization, Section VII, below.
Mailing Address: Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, OH 43215
(Street, City, State, Zip Code)
Daytime Telephone: (614) 221-4255 Fa"' (614) 221-4409
Which of the above is the primary contact person? Ben W. Hale, Jr. / Jackson B. Reynolds III
V. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY
Site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application. The Owner/Applicant hereby authorizes City
representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application.
VI. UTILITY DISCLAIMER
The City of Dublin will make every effort to provide essential services to the property as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and northwest
Franklin County has stretched the Citys capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said
facilities available to the applicant until some future date. The ApplicanVOwner hereby acknowledges that approval of this request for rezoning by the Dublin
Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to
provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Applicant.
VII. OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATIVE~f eS~ee attached form.
I C~ ~ ~z / ~ ~ ,the owner and applicant, hereby authorize
to act as my representative and agent in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application including modifying the project, and I agree
to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated agent.
Signature of Current Property Owner. D ~atei"' jJ i'~j i ~ ? I'
11.1 it
Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: J I
VIII. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT C 1 T~r Q~ D U B L 1 N
Rezoning Application PlA-108 Data 09/28!99
EXHIBIT "B"
STATE OF OHIO
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
I, Jackson B. Reynolds III ,the applicant or the applicant representative, have read
and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached e>fiibits and other information submitted is complete
and in all respects true and correct, to best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature of Applicant or ~ Date: ~Q~ /
Authorized Representative: _/lam(/ (/t
~ ~
Subscribed and sworn to before met / day of l~ , 19 _'__<<~
Notary Public
,.aoauun,e,,
,~Pa~at. sF
9` = BETSY B. GAITERS
* NOTARY PUBUC, STATE OF OHIO
s~ `o ~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OEC.15, 2002
"'3
wry
r~ ~ ' 1~~9
t,~ v 1 ,
CITY QF DUBLI~J
R,,,rv,in„ Annlir.,~inn P:uY1 $ of 5 PLA-iC8 C9/~8;99
Surcoanding Property Owners
Duke Constcucfion L!P Duke Realty L/P JT Properties
8888 Keystone Crossing 8888 Keystone Crossing % ITM Services Inc.
Indianapolis, IN 46240 Indianapolis, IN 46240 P.O. Box 672346
Houston, TX 77267
1 ' Reit Inc. Modernage Ina Pacific Industrial Properties
g6! ob Evans Farms Inc. 6820 Lyndon B Johnson Freeway Holding Inc.
3 South High Street Dallas, TX 75240 ~ Brinker Liternational
P.O. Box 07863 6820 Lyndon B Johnson Freeway
Columbus, OH 43207 Dallas, TX 75240
Star Bank Central Ohio BP Oil Company Jupiter Ohio Inc.
175 South Third Street, 4th Floor 101 West Prospect P.O. Box 256
Columbus, OH 43215 Cleveland, OH 44114 Bloomington, IN 43017
Wendy's International Inc. United Dairy Farmers Inc.
P.O. Box 256 3955 Montgomery Road
Dublin, OH 43017 Cincinnati, OH 45212
. - ,~-,u
- . ~~~9
CITY DUBLIN
venalor_lbl
. 2.039 ACRES July 2: J7 L.1 ` ~ ~
NORTH OF TlJTTLE CROSSING BOULEVARD Revised July 14,1998
EAST OF PAUL BLA2TsR PARKWAY
CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, being a part of Lot 10
of "Took Crossing", a wbdivisioo of rocacd in Pht Baok 71, Piet 100,101 and 102 (aU
refaeaoes being to the retards of the Recorder's OEI'ioe, Fcutklat County. Ohio) nail being mom
particttlady described a: tolbws:
Begiming at as iroa pia fowl at a southwesterly wrnu of Lot 10, the tour
corner of Rescrve "B` nerd in the nortltady right-o~way line of'IY~ttk Ccotsiag Boulevard, 100
feet in widd , .
11a?ce along the ooounoa firm betwaxt Lot 10 and Resertro B" the following coupes:
1. North i0'•3S 16" West, a distaaoe of 27.50 feet b as iron pia found at a point of .
awatum;
2. With the aro of a curve to the kft, having a radirrt of 67.50 feet. a oeatral angle
of 90' 00'00".the chord of which bears North 55' 3S l5" Wert, a chord ~
dis~toe of 95.46 foot to sot iron pia found tR the point of tangency; .
3. SouW 79.24' 44" Wort, a dirtanoe of 17.50 feet b as iron pia found in the j
easterly rigs-o~aray line of Paul Blanc Parkaray. 50 feet from centerline;
Thence along said right-of-way lise~ the eretterly line of I.ot 10, We folkwving Dowser: ,
1. North 10' 3S l6" West, a distaaoe of 3527 fee4 to an iron pia fowl at a point of
2. Witt the arc of a verve to the kR. having a radius of 59935 feet. a central angle
of 20' 43'48', the chord of which bears NoRh 20' ST 10" West, a chord
distaaa of 216.67 fed to as iron pLt found ore a point of reverse aavatta+r - . .
3. With the am of a curve to the right, having a radiw of 500.00 fed„ a eaitral
aagk of 2' 4T 25", the chord of which beam NorW 29' S5' 22" West, a chord k ~
d'ataaoe of 2436 'feet to a PX. oul td is the Renter of a private service road -
Tbatoe akmg said caUerliae and into Lot 10 rho folkwing causal: ~ Dtr L?3
~ of 1. North 61' 21C 20" East, a distance of 7S0 fad to a P.K. nail ad at a point of
cwvaturr
~~3_ 2 Witlc the arc of a curve to the rigbd, hiving a radius of 150.00 feed. a oa~tral
Cz ,3 angle of 17' S6' 23", We almrd of whidr bears Nash 70.2t? 32" East, a
distaaoe of 46.78 feet to a P.K. sail let a the point of tangency;
3. NaTh 79.24'44" Fast, a dittarta? of 23529 feet to a P.K. nail set at the ~ ,
northwesterly corner of that 1.Sn acre trail as described is a deed to BEF REIT,
inc.. of moord is Official Reoorda Vdume 36053, Page H14;
Thence along tl~e westerly line of said 1.572 acre.trad the following courses:
L South 10' 35' 16" East. a distance of 303.00 fed to an iron pin ter;
Jan p 2. Natb 79' 24'44" East. a distance Of 18.00 feet m an iron pia set; .
3. South 10' 35' 16" East, a distance of 72.00 fed to as irna pia ad at the
soutlnves6erly corner of said 1.572 acre tract' in the southerly line of Lot 10 sad
is the aottlurty right-olway line of Tuttle C3rOSSiug Boulevard;
rs+rl
Thane SouW 79' 24'44" West, along said right-o~way line„ a distance of 174.79 feet to
the place of beginning and cootainittg 2.039 acres of load.
Bearings herein am based on South 79' 24' 44" West for Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. Plat
Book 71, Pages 100,101 sad 102.
lroa pies let consist of a 1" (O.D.) iron pipe, 30" fang with a plastic cap inscribed "M-E
ENC,~s-6gn•.
This descripdca was prepared by M-E Gvil Eat Inc. based oa iafanaatioa
obtained from as adnal field aurvry of the promises.
~ ~ • . ` . ~ . ~ OF ~'E I Engineering, lac.
s ~..P:~.
. ~ ~ t YVYNO . ~ BY N
~~6 ti872 ~p ~ Robert S. Wyaa, P ` - it ~ ~ i
I STEQ` Registered Swv .6872
it 97300802.039~q~lagd C 1 ! f t.r ~--1J ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ N
i
- ~ - -
_ ~Y. _
~ ' : • 6a~y g : drv~i'a • - ~i ~f• • S~C~Ygy~_ Dt ~Oql~" ~ . i
4 .
' `-I~ie;Js ~/~I~a8.1~~1~]Wa~f~ofSp~~tl~k,at8~deslQao~~ :
. _ m•snbmit~dpn~~e• a~~ep~aC~oQp~oatTTye • • • .
. _
• _ aad s~ma~ P1~fotti~e~.039~aaes~cn~~s~ofTi~tlo . . , ' •
. • ~ .pCi7p0~Od Of
~ ?~~iaclL7i:L ~!C ~ ~ ~ - ~ : • .
. _ Y• Y
- . ' . m~e~e,~mvm~gpi~aooss sad~atbac s~_~cnimodaad m ~ .
• •
' • ~ a]1o~tbeaft~~peopatYasa~ithidnv~cu~odss~~1 - .
.
_ .
' j~c ' ~ ~ Gary .s . Brovt~ " .
• / •i• _ • • ~ ~ 1 ,
_ • ' ~ - ~ Q~~' - 7 199 . _ ~
. ~ = • ~ ~ ~ ~ - CITY 4F DUBLIN ' ' - •
E/E 39Vd ~ 660ZS9E6[SsQI d'iZ~35di13a6?13QNtlsa?lIAOS=NOD Ez=Sii 66-6Z-d75
- _ YP~ I
12-21-99; 4:58PM;Smith & Hale ;614 221 4409 tt 2/. 8
PROPOSED TEXT
Subarea A4 -Service Zones
Permitted Uses:
The following uses shall be permitted within Subarea A4.
1. Those uses listed in Section 153.026 and 153.034 of the Zoning Code.
w
2. Eating & Drinking establishment.
,
3. Day care.
4. Ancillary commercial uses located within an office building or a stand-alone building.
The following list of uses shall be permitted within Subarea A4, specifically limited to
the 6,000 square foot building which abuts the Gentry Lane right-of--way.
a, General Merchandise/Retail Stores
i. Candy store
ii. Book store (no food or beverage sales allowed to the public)
iii. Florist
iv. Card shop
v. Shoe sales and repair
vi. Tailor
vii. Retail bakery
viii. Convenience mart (no fresh sandwiches may be made/sold
within the store)
b. Personal Service Uses
i. Beauty salon and barber shop - up to 25% of the 6,000 square foot
building (1,500 square feet) may be so used
ii. Dry cleaning, pressing, and garment repair
iii_ Photographic studios and sales
iv. Advertising
v. Miscellaneous repair (i.e. watch, clock, and jewelry)
c. Administrative, Business, and Professional Offices
u Stock broker
iii Trust company
iv Title company D ~ Q
v Insurance carver and agents
1 DLC ? 1 1999
CITY OF DUBLIN
/2-21-99; 4:58PM;Smi th & Hale ;674 221 4409 tt 4/, 8
and landscaping effectively shielding the street from the impact of activity on the site. The
following additional standards aze deemed appropriate to produce such a function.
Yard and Setback Requirements:
1. Along Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, pavement setbacks shall be equal to 30 feet and
building setbacks equal to 80 feet. Signage setbacks shall meet the Dublin Zoning Code.
2. Along Blazer Parkway, pavement setbacks shall be equal to 30 feet and building setbacks
equal to 50 feet.
3. Along the private access drive, pavement setbacks from the curb of the access drive shall
be equal to 25 feet and building setbacks equal to 40 feet.
4. All other local street pavement setbacks shall be 25 feet and building setbacks equal to 50
feet.
5. Total ground covered by all buildings, excluding parking garages, shall not exceed 30%
of the total lot azea.
Utilities:
1. All utility lines, including water supply, sanitary sewer service, electricity, telephone, and
gas, and their connections or feeder lines shall be placed under ground.
2. All utility connections shall be out of view or screened.
3. All mechanical equipment and related structures shall be effectively screened form grade
level view by a fence, vegetation, or wall of harmonious architectural material and ~
character.
4. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof, ground or buildings shall be
screened from public view with materials harmonious with the building.
Circulation:
1. Blazer Parkway shall have a 100-foot right-of--way and a 56-foot pavement width.
2. The A4 Subazea shall share aright-in/right-out curb cut with the Al Subarea along the
Tuttle Crossing Boulevard frontage. One right-in/right-out curb cut shall be allowed on
Blazer Pazkway, and one full service curb cut shall be allowed on Gentry Lane.
3
12-2i-99; 4:58PM; Smith & Hale ;6i4 22~ 4409 # 5/ 8
PSVI~g:
1. Asphalt paving for roads and parking areas_
2. Concrete curb and gutter.
3. Concrete road paving as needed in the service areas.
4. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 5 feet wide. Paving material shall be concrete and
sidewalks shall be located as shown on the approved pedestrian circulation plan for the
Tuttle Crossing area (see Exhibit B).
Parking:
The following guidelines shall be followed in the design of parking facilities for Subarea A4:
1. The parking space allotment shall be shared between the two buildings located in Subarea
A4. The site shall supply 83 parking spaces which will service both the restaurant and
the 6,000 square foot rear building.
2. Drive-thru stacking areas for fast food restaurants shall accommodate a minimum of 8
spaces per exchange window.
3. Bank drive-thru stacking requirements according to the Columbus Zoning Code.
Waste and Refuse:
All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall or fence.
Service:
1. All refuse, trash and garbage containers shall be enclosed or not visible from the street or
adjoining property.
2. No noises smoke, odors, vibrations or other nuisances shall be permitted.
3. No area of the site will be used or outdoor storage.
4. Service courts and loading docks shall be screened from all streets or adjacent buildings
by landscaping, mounding or walls.
5. All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid wall
or fence.
4
t2-2t-99; 4:58PM;Smith & Hale ;674 227 4409 # 6r 8
6. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on
any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure.
Landscaping:
1. Within the setback area along Blazer Parkway, Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, Bradenton
Road, and the private access road, a 3-foot average height continuous earth mound shall
be installed as well as 1 tree per 40 feet of frontage or fraction thereof.
2. A common landscape theme and plan (Exhibit B) shall be adhered to by all property
owners within Subarea A4.
All landscaping shall be according to the Dublin Landscape Code Chapter 1187 and shall follow
the Subarea Development standards established under Subarea A4 -Service Zones under
landscaping.
Signs and Graphics:
Building Identification Signage (refer to the General Section of this zoning text):
1. All building identification signage shall have only the company name and logo. No
brand names or products shall be listed on the sign.
2. Each building (two total buildings on the subject site) shall be entitled to one wall sign
and one free standing sign the total of which shall be 90 square feet (with 50 square feet
allotted to the free standing sign and 40 square feet for the wall signage) should the 6000
square foot building change tenants and two or more tenants locate in the building, the
tenants may utilize the allowable wall and free standing signage divided among the
tenants located within the building on proportionally sized tenant panels. The maximum ~
signage square footage for each building may not be exceeded but may be divided among
the tenants within the parameters of the square footage allowed under this text.
3. All building identification signs shall be freestanding, ground-mounted, and double-faced
and set perpendicular to the street frontage, or shall be wall-mounted single block letters.
4. No temporary product advertising signage shall be attached to the building.
5. All traffic and directional signs shall conform to the Dublin sign code, Chapter 1189.
6. All window signage shall conform to the Dublin sign code, Chapter 1189.
5
t2-2i-99; 4:58PM;Smith & Hale ;6~4 22i 4409 # 7/ 8
Architectural
Height:
No out-parcel structure shall be more than 28 feet in height. For structures with pitched roofs,
this height limit will be measured to the roof peak.
Color Palette:
Earth tones and muted and natural tones are preferred. Accent colors in brighter hues are
permitted for building accent features only, such as awnings, doors, limited trim, etc. A mixed
palette on a single building should be carefully selected so all colors harmonize with each other.
Materials:
1. Warm-tone brick and stone (predominant material).
2. On pitched roofs, standing seams cedar shakes, or asphalt shingles with no less than 325
lb. per square weight shall be used.
3. Wood, stucco, tile, decorative concrete block, and other similar materials may be used as
an accent with brick and stone.
Roof:
1. Pitched roofs with gabled or hipped ends are required with a slope equal to 6/12 or
greater.
~,z,..:
2. Minimum 8-inch overhangs aze required.
3. Glass roofs are acceptable in portions of a structure.
4. Mansard roofs are not permitted.
5. Flat roofs aze permitted, provided they are proportionately integrated with a sloped roof
system that adequately screens mechanical rooftop equipment and/or other penetrations.
Scale:
1. Structures shall be designed to harmonize with the landscape.
2. The scale of each building should be aided through the use of articulated building
6
12-21-99; 4:58PM;Smith & Hale ;614 221 4409 Y. 8/ 8
elements, such as porticos, dormers, recesses, awnings, and other such elements which
help break up the building mass.
Wall Articulation/Fenestration:
1. In addition to using building elements to articulate the building mass, individual walls
must be articulated with fenestration, pattern, or structural expression equally on ail sides
of each structure. ~
2. Blank facades on the "rear" of the building will not be permitted; however, articulating
such facade with recesses, fenestration, fences, pilasters, etc. is encouraged.
3. The amount of fenestration should be balanced with the amount of solid facade.
4. With the exception of enclosed service corridors, the buildings shall have the same degree
of exterior finish on all sides.
smiley.txt
12/21/99
7
~O1/13/00 THU 17:48 FAX 614 418 3355 McDONALDS f~j002
_ Project Management
Civil Engineering
Right-of--Way Acquisition
Construction Management
C O M P A N I E S
January 7, 2000
Mr. Joseph M. Smiley, Assistant Real Estate Manager
McDonald's Corporation
2 Easton Oval
Columbus, OH 43219
RE: Parking Utilization Study
Avery Road Store
Dear Mr. Smiley:
Attached are the results of our observations, taken at the Avery Road Store between December
12, 1999 and January 3, 2000.
The attached charts illustrate the average number of vehicles parked on the lot is considerably
below the capacity of the lot for all periods of the day, approaching 50% of the lot capacity
during the noontime lunch period A similaz trend was observed for the drive-thru lane. The
results of the three observation periods for the parking lot occupancy maybe summarized as
follows:
Parlang Lot Utilization
AM Noon PM
7:00 to 9:00 11:00 to 1:30 4:00 to 6:00
Average Number 12.56 ;?5.08 10.41
of Vehicles on Lot
Percent of Lot 24.15% 48.23% 20..02%
Ca ci
Similarly, the three observation periods of the drive-thrti lane activity maybe summarized as
follows:
Providing Management and Engineering Services In Columbus, Cincinnati, Canton, Toledo and Huntington, VW
635 Brooksedge Boulevard • Westerville, OH 43081 • (614) 818-4900 • Fcnr (614) 818-4901 • mailbox@mecompanies.com
01/13/00 THiJ 17:48 FA% 614 418 3355 McDONALDS 0 003
Parkin Utilization Stud Pale: 2
Drive-thru Lane
AM Noon pM
7:00 to 9:00 11:00 to 1:30 4:00 to 6:00
Average Number
of Vehicles in Lane 4.35 ti.87 3.45
Percent of Lane 36.25% 5 i .25% 28.75%
Ca ci
This study resulted in enough data to calculate the probability of lot and the drive-thru line
filling up during any particular ten minute observation period. Basically it can be said that the
pazking lot will never fill up, but the drive-thru lane will reach capacity occasionally during the
noontime peak. Drive-thru capacity or overflow was observed on four occasions, These results
are summarized as follows:
AM Noon PM Entire
7:00 to 9:00 11:00 to 1:30 4:00 to 6:00 Stud Period
Probability of Less than Less than Less than Less than
Lot Filling Up .0401 % .0001 % .0001 % .0001
Probability of 12% 240% .019% .37%
Drive-thru Fillip
Copies of the field observation sheets and calculations are attached. if you have any other
questions, please feel free to call.
S~ rely
chazd A. McGuinness, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Senior'Craffic Engineer
a: r. ~tt
File: McDonelds\Dublin\Week Resiilts
a r za o D ~
~ 0 00000 00 Opp o O p ti X000++~+~~~+~ ~f! 0000 p 000 0000
OINNNN NN `A1. `YA ~ +++NN NN NN ~+++J~ - m O PO,Si O V V V V V V -tn ~ n
~ °ooaeooo~I'oavoo 3e ooo°o~°ooooo°ooooo°o Iii 00000°000000°0~~ ~
n ~ ~~b9V~v~~O~9~ m vya99~~9~vDDD»D ~a DD>D>D»>DDD ` 0
. ~3ss~tst~s:c3 ~ssssa~s3ss~~~zs ass3a~ss~;;s _ ~a
v ~ 9 ~ c
mW3 mN~ .f .Ns O.ai
V A ?C ~ A O VN~ ~~NN Nff NOm + O n
m~ n A i~ fl + p Y V N CI V m m V m CI P NOW ~f A n P GR N W N VI O N 4D m m A N a a to N W O m 0 A t0 0 10 v Cl m ~n m a u, tC W
~ o ~ ~ 7~
r i ~ ~ iY a ~ o CN
~ N T i N w m~ Ol ~
o~u ~ v7u~ ~ N~ ma,, ~ ~~~N zr a C
~ 2
W N 2 MN~ O AN W N-+W N+NN -+N•~ ~C r N OCI V OC11Cm W N NOI V mAtlIQ» ~ yI Nm W W V A N ~O+-BONN C H
-+i Y . O
N =
~ i OA 7C4 C
j V N J -J V7 W W W W W W W W N N N N N 7~ ~ O
W V O C/ N V N tC O+ N O+ W W O~ V W N N O VI W V W A N W V
? O Q N
• 4 7n S C
W Q) _ _ _ T m O
j rr O
N mNCI W N-+~~NW A WN O(IIm V V ~mC1 CO V mOW AWC1 2
Y
~ N
.o CAI A S C
b
tNit ~ C1 V N• O d1 m tb V+ N A 01. tNC V -W+m (N71 N A B (W71 O N Q N~ L~ V O O~ a C1 A N W~ N W N N M
O ~
t G
O M
W V W Q.
_ _ _ S m
W N VCIW L~~N-~N W NN mm V EDm C1 V+O W ~mN~ V A W O 00
W-. pomaowmaW~moWVIOI°
_ m ~
oo aa N A .a ~
m d Y U 1 O N N O-~ m N V O CNI N O~ m N a OW1 + N O L~ N N O V N N fVil O W A N (J 1 A J~ ~
fTV W ND~ eD
O
•
~a
• ~
A O ~ A S Q
O N fl1O OA 2 Y
m W W u•mN W A W NN V NAA C)N Ol CO VAN V V W f0 C1 CI OI V ~D W A OmO1 dCf C1 a ON07N OI CIN
_ d
41 fNJ W W m
~1 V j ~ r N V N N N N N N W N N N N N N N~ 1. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
V iO m m V N O O W U1 W~~ N N N VOA Q) N V Go m N f>> A N O O W N OI vI + m V W~ N A~ W N
? G
m
m {~I N-~ ~ ~ W V m
UO V V OI W L-+NONO7 A WN tJ101 (71 N V mtOm 0701N t0 W OmO1NN ~ W O1m V mm V V V W V-~01 L2
~ N
rY1M111 V N a ~ ~ V
v s _
V O ~ W N W W N N W W W N N N j N ~ N~ OG V r r ~ ~ m
V V mPIOm V CImONCi VOi tCN CIO OIC CI O SON V W aD W t0 W m W mCl Clm m(/1 W aNm A W W m
v
~ T
n
fr ~r U ~ Y
IpCPP+0141 W Nmmo1 W AN+ imG~ CI V fC tO miDb V V W O+A CIN tV71m V N ANNA V mCI AvI W
9 N
O W _ _ ~
pI CI W jNN NNN N N ANN N+
10 O V 41 CI f0 m V m V b V m t0 O tC V CIO N W 41 41 N N A O W N m J O /C V N Vt 1C + O N O V V b
vw
a~
~e
A (4~1 V ~ W SG
CI A W m a N 411V m m W a L N W1 m m W CI ~ ~ V 10 m V m m (C V Cf Ct N O N W C1 W CI m W W N O N N N 2{
9 ~
x ~
N ,
as-+ ~~o
NaD VtAOm•+W OCnW ~O~ O
O=
A j
a
w j m
PA ~C
N~WNLC141W N41 Cr A-+
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
December 9, 1999
CITY OF DlBLl11
Division of ~""i"9
5800Shirr-Rings Road
! ibGn, Oha 416-1236
Y~rr
Phone/f DD: 614761 X550
fax: 614161.6566
Web Site: www.dubGn.oh.us
The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting:
1. Rezoning Application 99-1082 -Revised Composite Plan -Tuttle Crossing PCD,
Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway
Location: 2.039 acres located on the northeast corner of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard
and Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway.
Existing Zoning: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Tuttle Crossing Plan).
Request: A rezoning by way of creation of Subarea A4 within the Tuttle Crossing
PCD to permit additional retail uses and a reduction in parking from 121 to 83 spaces
under the provisions of Section 153.058.
Proposed Use: A 4,050 square foot restaurant with drive-thru and a 6,000 square foot
retail building.
Applicant: Venator Group Specialty Inc., c/o Gary H. Brown, 233 Broadway, New
York, NY 10279; represented by Ben W. Hale, Jr. and Jackson B. Reynolds III, Smith
and Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215.
MOTION: To approve this application because it meets the PCD requirements, promotes land
uses that support the employment centers and the Community Plan goals, providing the
appropriate level of parking, with nine conditions:
1) That the parking and drive-thru stacking study be repeated with the results re-
verified prior to Council consideration;
2) That written agreements for off-site parking spaces for all employees be
secured, subject to staff approval;
3) That the architecture of the two buildings be well coordinated with each other
and the surrounding development;
4) That the text be revised to further restrict the set of permissible uses;
5) That the second building cannot be used for restaurant purposes;
8UktMtT1'ED r0 C4UNgL
Page 1 of 3
~ i3 ~ ~ ar~rnvo oN ~ ~ ~
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
December 9, 1999
1. Rezoning Application 99-1082 -Revised Composite Plan -Tuttle Crossing PCD,
Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway
(Continued)
6) That the text concerning utilities and building materials remain the same;
7) That Item 2, in the Signage and Graphics section of the text be clarified;
8) That Item 1 in the Parking section of the proposed text be revised to require a
minimum of 83 parking spaces on the site; and
9) That the following changes be made to the proposed text:
Subarea 4 Service Zones:
Item 4:
"That ancillary commercial uses located within an office building
in a stand alone building..." the word "in" should be changed to
"or". After Gentry Lane right-of-way", the remainder of the
paragraph should be deleted.
Item 4.a.vii:
"Apparel and Accessory Store" should be deleted.
Item 4.a.ix:
"General :Merchandise" should be deleted. "Convenience mart"
remains with "no fresh-made sandwiches may be made or sold"
added.
Item 4.b.i:
Beauty Salon and Barber Shop:
"up to 25 percent of the 6,.000 square foot building (1,500
square feet maximum)" should be added.
Item 4.d.xiii:
Businesses and Support Services, Cellular phones and Sales and
Services:
Should be revised to say "Celluar phone, sales and service" .
Conditional Use:
In addition to the drive-thru facility, conditional use should
include "General merchandise, personal service, or support
services which are not otherwise listed and which are
demonstrated to be consistent with appropriate commercial
activity on the site, and will not create a burden on parking or
other site utilization in the area.
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RECORD OF ACTION
December 9, 1999
1. Rezoning Application 99-1082 -Revised Composite Plan -Tuttle Crossing PCD,
Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway
(Continued)
General -Architecture:
"Within this mold, all faces may identify the separate users and
their products with appropriate expressions of individuality"
should be deleted.
* Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions.
VOTE: 5-2.
RESULT: This rezoning application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a
positive recommendation.,
STAFF CERTIFICATION
D. Talentino
Planner
• Y
Page 3 of 3
STAFF REPORT
DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 1999
(;1'fl' (IF DUBLIN
Oiviswn of Plarodng
5800 Shier-R'a~gs Road
DubGa, Ohio 43016-1236
Phone/1D0: 614-761.6550
Fax: 614-161.6566
Web Site: www.dubl'm.oh.us
CASE 1: Rezoning Application 99-1082 -Revised Composite Plan -Tuttle Crossing
PCD, Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Memorial
Parkway
APPLICANT: Venator Group Specialty Inc., c/o Gary H. Brown, 233 Broadway, New
York, New York 102,79; represented by Ben W. Hale and Jackson B.
Reynolds III, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
REQUEST: Review and approval of a rezoning application to revise the composite plan and
development text of the Tuttle Crossing PCD, Planned Commerce District by
creating Subarea A4 under the provisions of Section 153.058. The rezoning
will permit additional retail uses and reduce the parking requirement from 121
to 83 spaces fora 4,050-square-foot restaurant and a 6,000-square-foot ret<zil
building. The site is 2.039 acres located on the northeast corner of Tuttle
Crossing Boulevard and Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway.
STAFF COl\TTACT: John Talentino, Planner.
UPDATE Due to the late hour, this case was postponed at the last meeting without discussion
or vote. The Staff Report remains unchanged.
BACKGROUND:
The site is zoned PCD, Planned Commerce District, and is located within Subarea Al of the
Tuttle Crossing plan. This was a major rezoning affecting 110 acres in the northeast quadrant
of the Tuttle Crossing interchange. There have been a few changes since it was initially
adopted, such as creating a hotel site for the Marriott. On this specific site, there have been no
formal requests filed for Commission review.
Following a recommendation by the Planning Commission on this rezoning application, a
public hearing will be held at City Council, and a vote will be taken to approve or deny the
rezoning petition. Atwo-thirds vote is required to overturn a negative recommendation from
the Planning Commission (a majority vote is required otherwise). If approved, a development
plan must be reviewed and approved by this Commission before construction can begin.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -December 9, 1999
Page 2
[Note: The Code does permit for the composite plan and development plan to be considered
together. A restaurant development plan for adrive-thru restaurant and a copy store
(Application 99-109DP/CU) will be scheduled on a future agenda.]
CONSIDERATIONS:
Site Characteristics:
• The site is 2.039 acres located at the northeast corner of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and
Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway. The site is generally rectangular with 175 feet of
frontage on Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and 280 feet of frontage on Blazer Parkway.
The north property line is the centerline of Gentry Lane (private). One of the original
landscape features for Tuttle Crossing was located on this corner, and the "reserve"
established for that purpose is still in place, but is not part of the site. The site is flat
and open. There are five existing deciduous trees within the reserve.
• The site is located within Subarea Al of the Tuttle Crossing PCD. It was established
largely as a "services" zone. The overall subarea contains about five acres, and the
permitted uses currently include restaurants, daycare facilities, and ancillary
commercial uses within an office structure plus all SO and OLR uses. Drive-thrus are
conditional uses. The rest of this subarea has been developed with a Bob Evans
restaurant and a Boston Market (including drive-thru) restaurant. The Tuttle Crossing
zoning documents depict this as two restaurant sites.
• Immediately to the east of the site is the Bob Evans restaurant. To the south and west,
across Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Blazer Parkway, are developed bank and
restaurant outparcels in the City of Columbus. To the north, across Gentry Lane, are
two three-story office buildings under construction within Subarea B.
• The proposal here is to create a new Subarea A4 for the last two acres along Tuttle
Crossing Boulevard. This requires an amendment to the development text, and this is a
rezoning action. The architecture, etc. reflect the design intentions of the applicant,
however, these will not be forwarded to City Council and will not "run with the land."
The development plan includes these details, and is scheduled separately (Application
99-109DP/CU). Development plans are subject to revision as approved by the
Planning Commission under the provisions of Section 153.058. The new text is the
real issue here, and it will permit general retail, personal service, and business support
uses, plus a reduction in required parking on the entire site from 121 spaces to 83
spaces.
Community Plan Issues:
• The Future Land Use map in the Community Plan identifies this as a retail site. The
proposed text includes general retail, personal service, and business support uses that
are intended to serve the surrounding office development. Staff has some concerns
about some of the proposed uses, and recommends that the text be revised to further
restrict them. Office uses are already permitted, so those specifically listed in the
proposed text should be removed.
• The Community Plan recommends modifying zoning regulations to achieve a land use
mix that facilitates convenience, such as siting employment centers and retail uses near
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ,
Staff Report -December 9, 1999
Page 3
each other. It also recommends integrating locally serving retail with surrounding uses.
The goal is to reduce peak hour trips and promote pedestrian mobility.
Parking:
• The parking requirement is one space per 50 square feet fora 4,050-square-foot
restaurant, yielding 81 spaces. The retail use is based on one space per 150 square feet
for the 6,000-square-foot building, or 40 spaces.
• The proposal amounts to a 30 percent parking reduction. The applicant has submitted ~
one-day studies of parking and drive-thru stacking for two McDonald's restaurants
(Perimeter Center and Polaris), as well as for two Kinko's stores (Frantz Road and
Schrock Road). The study indicates that at the Perimeter Center McDonald's, the
highest parking lot utilization rate was 37 of the existing 53 spaces, and the longest
drive-thru stack was 11 vehicles. For the Kinko's use, based on the customers per hour
observed, the store would require between six and nine spaces. Since the results of this
study are somewhat surprising, staff recommends that the study be repeated to cover a
longer period of time. Due to the significant reduction in required parking as
proposed, staff recommends that written agreements for off-site employee parking be
secured.
• The following parking statistics have been gathered on Dublin fast food restaurants for
comparison purposes.
Parking Spaces
Restaurant Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Required Provided
Tim Hortons (Riverside Dr.) 3,736 75 51
Boston Market (Sawmill Rd.) 2,807 57 42
KFC (Sawmill Rd.) 2,828 57 41
Wendy's (Riverside Dr.) 3,198 64 68
McDonald's (Bridge St.) 3,593 72 20
McDonald's (Perimeter Ctr.) 3,200 64 53
Boston Market (Tuttle) 3,230 65 60
Wendy's/Tim Hortons (Avery Square) 5,210 105 62
Burger King (Avery Square) 4,450 89 51
McDonald's/Kinko's (Tuttle) 10,050 121 83
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
These development text revisions are officially a modification of the composite plan in the
Planned Commerce District, or a rezoning. This is a change in the "rules" by which future
development plans will be judged. A large number of parking variances have been granted, and
the parking appears to be more than adequate. The staff believes these overall modifications are
generally reasonable. Staff recommends approval with the following five conditions:
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Staff Report -December 9, 1999
Page 4
Conditions:
1) That the parking and drive-thru stacking study be repeated with the results re-
verified prior to Council consideration;
2) That written agreements for off-site parking spaces for all employees be
secured, subject to staff approval;
3) That the architecture of the two buildings be well coordinated with each other
and the surrounding development;
4) That the text be revised to further restrict the set of permissible uses; and
r~
5) That the second building cannot be used for restaurant purposes.
Bases:
1) The proposal meets the requirements for revising the development text under the
Planned Commerce District provisions of Section 153.058.
2) The proposal promotes land uses that facilitate convenience between
employment centers and retail uses, consistent with the Community Plan.
3) The proposal, as amended above, provides adequate, but not overly generous,
parking.
a
i i to . i t/ `1/" - <s1,'~ -~yt•+- Sp
:yam f ~ r
W E~ ~ i ~ ~ f~ ~ _ : e • pin,,,: ~ot~
a r _ -~°vRC 'eP
.n ~ rm ~P2
P H ~ ~A
INNOVAliON O~ i 'i ~ SO ~~'0
GIEN ~ L
~ K
~ C] cunt cr ~cT E..
Q ~RION
~v.D-ENBJJURG[i 1iAY ~ BEY ~°a A
~x ~ ~ ~ ~NGVIE(Y bR
acto xy ~ E4L MEld ~ ~ ~ ~ G
~ ~ I ~ g~~ ~ A ~ G ~ d RANDVIEW DR
-
mJuK/ a ~ q~, a~ 1
SC017d CT ~ ~ 4
w ~ TWP
GAEIIC CT w
,n
~
a °
4
O V a 1 CRAHER ~W '
® DR. ~ <P~ CREEK ~ ~ o0
CT U
ty D GtESEA~GS ttD , ItYIIAI~R x
~p FF[CE r.:., ~~In DR
a ~ a
~CHGROVE ~ x ~ GLEND~N l i ~ ~ a tI
~~g9 B
y
V ~ N ~ p 'off
URY 121 _ i ® , tC 4~ ~ ~ ~ CENTER AVE EEII~,D CT v d
W
c
c _
v SATE
L ~
~ CT ~6Q, TUTTIE RD~'
~ ~ ~
4~ - L ~ ~ IIIG :t~^'° ~ x
L _ E4
b
rcrrrcE RD rn
CROS ~ ~
~ NG
MAt 1
~ _ it
d ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UN ' ~C~
I ~ rd °
~ 6~
o /
~ o
OLDE DUB12N PC~R i
1
7POODS DR CpLUMBUS
• ~ ~ ~ y
'A
HILLIARD ~ ~ N
iooo 2000 ~ d d
SCALE IN FEET C
11N EQUg1..s 1200 FT 99-1082 d
Rezoning ~
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4 ~
McDonald's/Kinko's
~ ; .
G
i i PC 1~ r ~
~ - -
i o
R~ pCD PUD
PCD A o
~
~
OLR 4~ OLR TwF
CD
SO C
R
S O
P OLR
r1
LR -
PU ~
tr ~ 6 D
~ ~O '
. ; ~ P
PCD ~ o $
1.1~~ - ~ 'd
i r D G
. _ ~
ld
~ ~17~--d
F R
~ R-1
Pco SITE
- R- ~ ~
a,~~
d
~
x ~
-
a a
a ~
C~LUMB S
HIL I~RD
_ _
~ ~ 99-1082
- ' Rezoning
_ Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
~ - - -
` «
• ` _
• • • w• ••Z
•
• qtr. •r- r
- ~ 7
• • • ~ M . • w s i` ~ t • • •
~ •
• = • • • 1.. • • • I • • ..1 • • •
• . t .l • •.t . «i~ • I ~ • • • ZS
• • • 1 ~ ~ • • •
•f - 1
• . • • ~ •
~
• ~ • •
C •
' o
ao ~ ~ ~
ca .
~ .
- ~ -T ~ r
~ ¦r rn
• ~ f • • i.
~
j
.Q?
• i - - ~ •
f ~ ! 7_
. ~ i -
it _ C z
• ~ ~
D
m
r •
g
~ ~ah ~ • • - Q', .ter
o ~
~
' ' 'a 'f0.
~ f s
1t ~ f ~ • •
~ . . ~
a...
~ t
t~ • ' • •
~ ~ r •
Q, ~ 99-1082 '
~ _ ~ y { Rezoning
• Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -December 9, 1999
Page 3 ~~~~j
1. Rezoning Application 99-1082 -Revised Composite Plan -Tuttle Crossing PCD,
Subarea A4 - Kinko's Copy Store - 5520 Paul G. Blazer Memorial Parkway
John Talentino said this is a rezoning application is to revise the composite plan and the
development text for Tuttle Crossing PCD, to include additional retail uses and reduce the
parking for an outparcel area along Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. The parking is to be reduced
from 121 to 83 spaces fora 4,000 square foot restaurant and a 6,000 square foot retail building
(Kinko's). He showed several slides.
r~
Mr. Talentino said the north property line is the centerline of Gentry Drive, a private access
drive. Surrounding uses include fast-food restaurants, a hotel, and several office buildings.
The PCD text permits a right in/right out curbcut along Tuttle Crossing and along Blazer
Parkway. Gentry Drive will have a full service access and a sidewalk.
Mr. Talentino said staff observed 26 cars during the lunch hour stacked around in the drive-
thru at the nearby Wendy's restaurant. The cars waited without signage. No jamming
problems were seen because of an extra drive aisle.
Mr. Eastep said he had observed parked cars being trapped by the drive-thru stacking at a
different fast-food restaurant. Mr. Talentino said angling some of the parking spaces should
resolve this problem.
Mr. Talentino said if this rezoning is approved by City Council, the development plan and
conditional use applications must also be reviewed later by the Commission. He said this site
is in Subarea A1, and restaurants, daycare, and office uses are currently permitted by the text.
He said the proposal is to create Subarea A4 with expanded uses to service area businesses and
reduced restaurant parking. He said the Community Plan identified this as a retail site.
Mr. Talentino said there were some minor revisions to the text. The proposed text states in
error that utilities may be placed above ground; the text will remain as is regarding this. The
intention is to use all brick and siding. Staff believes that stone should also be permitted.
The signs and graphics text section 2 states, "When more than one tenant occupies the
building, there shall be one sign, which may contain wall and freestanding individual tenant
panels for those uses located on the lot." Mr. Talentino said the text needs clarification for
these two freestanding uses.
Mr. Lecklider asked if four signs are requested. Mr. Talentino said yes, a ground sign on
each public road and two building signs. Mr. Lecklider asked if there could be a ground sign
for both buildings on Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. Mr. Talentino said no. Only wall signage
can face Gentry Lane. On Blazer Memorial Parkway and Tuttle Crossing Boulevard ground
and wall signs are permitted. The two signs need to face different streets, and the maximum
combined sign area for each use is 90 square feet. The Kinko's building might have several
tenants. The Code permits a project sign if there are three tenants or more, plus a wall sign
for each tenant.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -December 9, 1999 A F T
Page 4
Mr. Talentino said staff wants to tighten up the permitted uses, eliminating convenience stores
and several others. By deed restrictions, a second restaurant could not be put on this site. He
suggested that under General Merchandise, "no food or beverage sales are allowed to the
public" be added to the bookstore use for clarification.
Mr. Talentino said the applicant submitted parking/stacking studies for two Kinko's and two
McDonald's stores. He said staff expects heavy stacking here, similar to the experience at the
Tuttle Crossing Wendy's and Taco Bell restaurants. Because of the significant reduction in
parking, staff recommends written agreements for off-site employee parking.
Mr. Talentino said staff believes the overall modifications to the text are reasonable and
recommends approval, with seven conditions:
1) That the parking and drive-thru stacking study be repeated with the results re-verified prior
to Council consideration;
2) That written agreements for off-site parking spaces for all employees be secured, subject to
staff approval;
3) That the architecture of the two buildings be well coordinated with each other and the
surrounding development;
4) That the text be revised to further restrict the set of permissible uses;
5) That the second building cannot be used for restaurant purposes;
6) That the text concerning utilities and building materials remain the same as the existing
text; and
7) That Item 2 in the Signage section be clarified.
Mr. Eastep said this seems to be over-development and was surprised that staff supports it.
Mr. Talentino said the parking appears to be adequate, and the drive-thru maximizes the on-
site stacking. He gave several other examples.
Ms. Clarke said the fast food business fluctuates greatly. It appeared to her that evening surges
seemed to be tied to youth activities, such as basketball games, rehearsals, etc. At times, the area
fast food restaurants are in use only minimally from dinnertime on into the evening. Staff has
observed huge differences in evening usage at a single restaurant. Staff agrees with the applicant
that the true peak is for lunch business.
Ms. Clarke said the Tuttle Crossing PCD included four outparcels in Dublin. The first two sites
(Bob Evans and Boston Market) were slightly enlarged to add parking. The remaining land is
probably too large for a single restaurant and too small for two. This area along Tuttle Crossing
Boulevard was really zoned for four businesses. Three restaurants fit, and a fourth alternate
business is needed. Staff believes that McDonald's and Kinko's would be a good land use
match, having different peaks, one drive-thru, and both servicing the nearby offices.
Mr. Fishman said no successor to Kinko's should be a big traffic generator. He said only at
income tax time is Kinko's jammed. Its peak is in the evening.
Mr. Sprague said there is a lot of post-dinner commerce in that area, such as the mall. Mr.
Fishman said many uses would produce a jammed lot.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -December 9, 1999 ~ T
Page 5
Ms. Clarke said staff has tried to encourage uses to specifically support the offices. There are
plenty of general retail activities in the area already.
Mr. McCash noted that the Commission would not have to approve a future change in use.
Under the text, a new form of commercial activity being proposed would be subject to approval
by the staff, not the Commission. "General merchandise and convenience mart" are too broad.
Mr. Fishman agreed. There was some discussion about a toy store use.
Mr. McCash said the site was being rezoned for any retail use, in addition to McDonald's. Mr.
Talentino disagreed, and there was further discussion. Mr. Talentino said the goal is to create
alternate uses in case Kinko's leaves, without necessitating a full rezoning process.
Mr. McCash said the parking was tied to specifically McDonald's and Kinko's, but the uses are
broader. He said a Blockbuster/McDonald's site would have a parking overflow. Mr. Talentino
said a Blockbuster is much larger than 6,000 square feet, and a video store is not a listed use.
Before it can be approved, parking must be reviewed.
Ben W. Hale, Jr., attorney, said the last thing McDonald's wants is a parking problem; they agree
totally with the Commission. He agreed to omit "General Retail" and would return to the
Commission, instead of staff, if there were any later changes considered to the list.
Mr. Fishman said any change in use, should return to the Commission for approval.
Joe Smiley, McDonald's Corporation, said he will give aten-year lease to Kinko's with several
five-year options. Tomorrow's technology may be different, and he needs to structure a financial
package that works for McDonald's. He will work with staff on a good set of uses.
Mr. Fishman said this is a safety issue. The Perimeter McDonald's is too big for its site and was
a mistake. This is a perfect combination. If, however, the uses change, they should come back
for a rezoning. Ms. Clarke suggested utilizing the conditional use, to give the Commission
oversight, cutting the review time.
Mr. Hale said this is better than the Avery Road McDonald's because it has three entry points.
Mr. Smiley did not expect any apparel uses; they would be happy to return to the Commission
for conditional use approvals.
Mr. Sprague said McDonald's was diversifying into other restaurants. He asked if one of them
such as Donato's could be substituted on this site. Mr. Smiley said yes.
Mr. Hale agreed to remove "General Merchandise -Apparel/Accessory Store". A bookstore
could not serve food or drinks here.
Mr. Smiley said they would not remove the "Beauty Salon/Barber Shop".
Mr. Eastep still had concerns that this was too intense for the site.
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commissio ~ ,
Minutes -December 9, 1999
Page 6
Mr. Lecklider said this site was very high profile, and McDonald's would generate more traffic
even at dinnertime than elsewhere.
Mr. Hale distributed letters of support from the local business community. He said the site can
hold ten more parking spaces, but greenspace is more attractive. Mr. Smiley said they have a
joint parking agreement. Mr. Hale said they have adequate parking for these two uses.
Mr. Eastep thinks the parking code should be revisited and updated. He could not support this
application because of the parking and the potential safety issue. •w~
Mr. Smiley said most of McDonald's staff would work 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Employees
would meet at the Marriott and drive together in one car to the store. He did not envision
employees walking from Marriott. Sometimes they buy a van to transport employees.
Mr. Lecklider appreciated the efforts of the staff and applicant to make this work. However, the
site was planned for four businesses. He wondered if this was the appropriate use. He suggested
a bigger restaurant might work better. Mr. Smiley noted the site is "dry."
Mr. Lecklider had concerns about support uses such as cellular phone sales and service and
parking. Mr. Smiley said they were not busy during lunchtime. Mr. Lecklider disagreed.
Mr. Eastep made the motion to approve this application because it meets the PCD
requirements, promotes land uses that support the employment centers and the Community
Plan goals, and provides the appropriate level of parking, with nine conditions:
1) That the parking and drive-thru stacking study be repeated with the results re-verified prior
to Council consideration;
2) That written agreements for off-site parking spaces for all employees be secured, subject to
staff approval;
3) That the architecture of the two buildings be well coordinated with each other and the
surrounding development;
4) That the text be revised to further restrict the set of permissible uses;
5) That the second building cannot be used for restaurant purposes;
6) That the text concerning utilities and building materials remain the same;
7) That Item 2, in the Signage and Graphics section of the text be clarified;
8) That Item 1 in the Parking section of the proposed text be revised to require a minimum of 83
parking spaces on the site; and
9) That the following changes be made to the proposed text:
Subarea 4 Service Zones:
Item 4:
"That ancillary commercial uses located within an office building in a
stand alone building..." the word "in" should be changed to "or".
After Gentry Lane right-of-way", the remainder of the paragraph
should be deleted.
, Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes -December 9, 1999
Page 7
Item 4.a.vii:
"Apparel and Accessory Store" should be deleted.
Item 4.a.ix:
"General Merchandise" should be deleted. "Convenience mart"
remains with "no fresh-made sandwiches may be made or sold" added.
Item 4.b.i:
Beauty Salon and Barber Shop:
"up to 25 percent of the 6,.000 square foot building (1,500 square feet
maximum)" should be added.
Item 4.d.xiii:
Businesses and Support Services, Cellular phones and Sales and
Services:
Should be revised to say "Cellular phone, sales and service" .
Conditional Use:
In addition to the drive-thru facility, conditional use should include
"General merchandise, personal service, or support services which are
not otherwise listed and which are demonstrated to be consistent with
appropriate commercial activity on the site, and will not create a burden
on parking or other site utilization in the area.
General -Architecture:
"Within this mold, all faces may identify the separate users and their
products with appropriate expressions of individuality" should be
deleted.
Mr. Sprague appreciated the efforts of Mr. Hale and Mr. Smiley. If this were larger, it would
have his support. Mr. Lecklider agreed. The uses go together, but the site is too small.
Mr. Eastep was convinced that this is a good land use combination with offset peak times.
Mr. McCash said any restaurants would be fast food. He could support this with the changes to
use conditional uses and bring them back to the Commission for approval.
Mr. Harian was comfortable relying on the McDonald's vast experience.
Mr. Hale agreed to the nine above conditions. Mr. McCash seconded the motion, and the vote
was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Lecklider, no; Mr. Eastep, yes; Mr. Sprague, no; Mr.
Peplow, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Approved 5-2.)
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission '
Page 7
Mr. Duros stated that he met w' Woody and Barbar Holt, represe tatives
of the East Dublin Community uncil, and present them with th
schematic sketches of the de lopment. Mr. Jeze inac asked if y
residents present at the me ing wished to comet t, but there as no
response.
The Commission members w e in agreement wi the densities f the office
buildings and were plea d with the develop ent in general Mr. Amorose
made a motion to appro the Concept Plan, seconded by Mr Reiner. The
vote was as follows: Rausch, yes; Mr Berlin, yes; Amorose, yes;
Mr. Jezerinac, yes; Geese, yes; Mr. einer, yes. T motion was
passed 6-0. rrr
Ms. Clarke inform the Commission t traffic coon were done on Martin
Road in November f 1986 before the eijer's store s opened and while
the St. Rt. 161 ridge was closed. Counts are sch uled to be taken next
weekend, and e ivalent compariso will be made.
~~3_ Rezoning Application Z88-014 - Tuttle Road/I-270 - Tuttle Crossing
Ms. Leitzell presented slides of the site and surrounding area.
-This application was heard informally last month, and a small tract of
land which was previously annexed is now included bringing the total to
115.7 acres.
-The site is located to the northeast of I-270 and Tuttle Road. The
property abuts the western office portion of the Llewellyn Farms PUD and
the Borror Corporation office property. To the north are residences in
Washington Township on lots of about 700 feet in depth which face onto
Rings Road. On the west side of the site. are I-270 and a 20-acre parcel
which was annexed to Columbus, and to the south across Tuttle Road is
additional land in Columbus which is expected to be used for commercial
and apartment uses_
Ms. Clarke presented the Commission with the following information:
-The property was reclassified recently into the R, Rural District, and
the applicant is requesting the PCD, Planned Commerce District.
-The site is the Dublin portion of .a major multi-use .development which is
expected to include the approval and construction of a new diamond
interchange at I-270 and Tuttle Road at the developer's expense. This
interchange will replace the long-expected I-270 interchange at Hayden Run
Road. Dublin staff favors this interchange because it is closer to
Dublin, and the land necessary for the interchange, as well as the cost of
construction, is being provided at the developer's expense. The City of
Columbus will be doing the construction and improvement of Tuttle Road
with this development. Dublin has agreed to work with property owners to
provide a northward connection to Rings Road.
-Ms. Clarke had distributed a corrected text with the packets and noted
that all the changes in the text were underlined. Most of the changes
were minor; for instance, the main drive has been given the name "Tuttle
Parkway," and the right-of-way has been corrected from 80 feet to 100
feet. Staff had requested some articulation of the developer's desire to
create a first-class office park, and this has been provided on the second
page of the text. This section states that the development will include a
coordinated landscape project and will include deed restrictions to
control signage, building materials, elevations, etc.
99-1082
Rezoning
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 8
-The site layout will include less intensive uses near Frantz Road.
Moving toward I-270, the uses will become more intense to include
signature, corporate-headquarter type offices and may include parking
garages.
-Sub-area A contains 34.4 acres, and the maximum density is 18,000 sq. ft.
per acre. The minimum building height is two stories, with a maximum
height of 100 plus feet.
-Sub-area B is 37.7 acres to be developed at a maxunun density of 14,000
square feet per acre. The maximum height of structures is 65 feet.
-Sub-area C is the easternmost 26.3 acres, and the maximum density is
11.,000 square feet per acre. The maximum height of structures is also 65
feet.
-Sub-area A-1 is 3.4 acres and is expected to be a services area with
restaurants and banks. The applicant has added to the text that a
drive-thru facility will be a Conditional Use instead of a Permitted Use
as requested by the Commission. The revised text contains conditions
pertaining to how these sub-areas will be developed to create a unified
architectural expression. The buildings are to be internally oriented,
and signage will not be toward Tuttle Road.
-The traffic network has been redesigned in line with the recommendations
of Barton-Aschman, the traffic consultant hired by Dublin for input on
this development.
-At the time the Staff Report was written, approval of the rezoning was
recommended subject to:
1) Articulation of an architectural standard for the project as a whole.
(Staff feels that this has been included in the revised text).
2) Revision of Development Standards text for correction and/or clarity.
(Staff feels that these concerns have also been addressed in the
revised text).
3) Submission of information regarding phasing, pedestrian/bike links,
utilities, and applicable deed restrictions as required in the
Composite Plan. (The applicant has specifically stated that deed
restrictions will be established before a final Development Plan is
submitted; pedestrian/bike links will also be presented for approval
by Commission at a later point. In regards to phasing, staff is
specifically concerned with the high-intensity uses near the freeway,
and what will happen if the interchange is not approved, or if the
interchange is substantially delayed. (The text states that Sub-area
A will not be developed until such time as the interchange itself is
under construction).
Ms. Clarke explained the approval process of the relatively new PCD,
Planned Commerce District.
Mr. Geese asked Mr. Willis where the sewer will be coming from to service
this project. Mr_ Willis stated that he did not have that information
with him. Mr. Bowman stated that the sewer is on Park Center Boulevard in
the right-of-way between the Borror Corporation building and the American
Cancer Society building. Mr. Geese asked where it will drain to. Mr.
Bowman replied that it will drain between Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Llewellyn
Farms. Mr. Geese questioned the capacity of the pump station with the
development of a project this size.
99-1082
Rezoning
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission
Page 9
Mr. Willis presented the engineering comments as follows:
-Storm water management plans and engineering details are needed at the
time of the final Development Plan.
Mr. Ben Hale, attorney for the applicant, explained that when the
subdivisions south of Hayden Run Road were put in, Columbus paid to have
oversized trunk lines put in and brought a trunk line up (south of Tuttle
Road) to service the tributary area. Most of this site will be serviced
by going south to that trunk line down through Shire Cove and under the
river. Only the Dublin portion of the development will be serviced through
Dublin. Mr. Hale added that the sewer. which is currently being installed
further east, at the expense of Mr. Edwards, will also serve this project. w~+
Mr. Geese expressed concern about the need for developers to contribute
toward the gravity flow sewer because he does not feel that force mains
and pump stations are a long-term solution. Mr. Bowman stated that the
sewer system was studied as part of Dublin's Master Plan, and the pipes
are actually operating at a lower capacity than they were designed for.
The ultimate solution to eliminating the pump stations is the installation
of the West Bank Interceptor Sewer. Mr. Jezerinac asked if the pipes in
Llewellyn Farms are adequately sized to handle development of this site.
Mr. Bowman stated that potentially there could be a problem where the
pipes come together at Frantz Road just south of Cramer Creek. This is
based on the development of Washington Township, but this development
itself should not cause a problem. Mr. Willis explained that the
tributary area that this pipe serves extends westward into Washington
Township. A problem could potentially occur if the entire tributary area
were to be developed at a high density.
Mr. Hale explained that the Tuttle Road/I-270 interchange better serves
Dublin than the Hayden Run Road location would have. Mr. Edwards is
paying for the $7.5 million interchange without any contribution from
governmental entities. The City of Columbus is going to upgrade Tuttle
Road. Mr. Hale stated that the developer hopes to have the interchange
under construction in the spring of 1989_ This full-service interchange
should alleviate congestion on several of Dublin's roads.
Mr. Jim Houk, a landscape architect with Bohm NBBJ, outlined changes in
the plans as follows:
-Mr. Houk demonstrated the site layout plan and stated that the major
through road has been rerouted to a north/south direction. The developer
is working with Dublin on a connection through to Rings Road to create a
finished boulevard with a landscaped median from.Tuttle Road up to-Rings
Road. Tuttle Road will also be upgraded to a landscaped-median boulevard
from Hirth Road to Frantz Road.
-Mr. Houk demonstrated a preliminary plan for a pedestrian pathway system
through this development. The developer is working with the City of
Columbus engineers trying to get an underpass under Tuttle Road to tie the
quadrants together.
Mr. Jezerinac questioned the development standards for the 20 acres of
Columbus property located in the Dublin quadrant. Mr. Hale stated that it
is the developer's intent to treat all areas of the project in a similar
manner. Mr. Jezerinac expressed concern about the large buildings in
in the Columbus portion having parking overlap into Dublin_ Ms. Clarke
stated that Dublin and Columbus staff should be able to coordinate the
development of areas which cross the property line_ Mr_ Houk added that
99-1082
Rezoning
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
DublinVPlanning and Zoning Commission
Page 10
the deed restrictions referenced in the text are for the entire
development, not just the Dublin portion. Mr. Reiner asked if this will
include Dublin's Landscape Code. Mr. Houk replied that the standards will
be the same. Ms. Clarke added that the Dublin Landscape Code was
simplified for application in Columbus, but the requirements iuaply the
same standard.
Ms. Rausch asked if the the entrances on both the Dublin and Columbus
sides of Tuttle Road will be mirrored. Mr. Houk replied that the entry
treatment will be the same.
Mr. Jezerinac expressed concern about allowing drive-thru facilities as a
Conditional Use in Sub-area B. Mr. Hale and Mr. Houk agreed that a
drive-thru facility will be limited to office uses such as a bank or
insurance office because they are the only Permitted Uses in this
district. A fast-food restaurant is not a Permitted Use in this district.
Mr. Jezerinac asked. what the justification was for a density of 14,000
square feet per acre in Area B. Mr. Houk stated that they are creating
a transition zone. Mr. Jezerinac stated that Sub-area B is too big for
such a high density. He also suggested that Sub-area C have a maximum
density of 10,000 square feet per acre to be consistent with Llewellyn
Farms office development. Ms. Clarke stated that she compared these
intensities with the development in Metro Center. The Trammel Crow and
Linclay buildings, which are even closer to Frantz Road, are at about
16,000 square feet per acre. Sub-area B will also be across from more
intense uses (a shopping center/fast-food restaurants) on the south side
of Tuttle Road in Columbus.
Ms. Rausch noted that with the office trend going to flex time, shifts may
overlap creating a need for additional parking.
Mr. Jezerinac asked why it was the intent to develop Sub-area C first.
Mr. Hale stated that the developer feels that this area is the most
marketable now. A road is scheduled to be built through Sub-area C from
Tuttle Road to Frantz Road to connect with Park Center Drive in 1989. Mr.
Jezerinac stated that he feels it is imperative for the City of Dublin to
add the two additional lanes to.Frantz Road in the very near future. Mr.
Hale added that if things go as planned, Frantz Road improvements, Tuttle
Road improvements and the interchange should be on line at the same time.
Mr. Berlin made a motion to approve the rezoning application subject to
Item 3 in the Staff Report of November 10, 1988, which states: Submission
of information regarding phasing, pedestrian/bike links, utilities, and
applicable deed restrictions as required in Composite Plan will be
subitted prior to the Development Plan. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion
and the vote was as follows: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Rausch, yes; Mr.
Jezerinac, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Geese, yes. The
motion was passed 6-0.
At this time, the meeting was recessed for approximately 15 minutes.
99-1082
Rezoning
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
• RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
- ___,lliuulcsa~ Dv61in City Council H_cet_ing ,llt•<'liu;;
naAi 'M Nau..,.,a c~~a,+.,: c..,,.. G.Is. A. rorna No. toll i__: _
~
' ,
~ 11<•1~l December 19, 1988 151 1
:i ~
~ '
~l The regutacly scheduled eeting oC the Oub in City Council was called toy
order by Mayor Hichael Close at 7:30 P. on Honday., D comber 19, 1988. '
i '
Mr. Jankowski Led the ledge oC Allegian c.
Membecs oC Council p went were: Hr. cose, Hayor CL se, Hr. Jankowski, ~
Hs: Haucer, Mc. Roz. ski, Mr. Strip, a d Mr. Sutphen. .
. ~
' ~I Nr. Nansley, City anager, avd Mr. S ith, Law Direct r, wece also present ,.,,rr
as were Mr. Bowma , Lt. Ccis, Hr. 11, ding, Nr. John on, Mr. Jones, Hr.
' McDaniel, Hs. Ne omb, Hs. 1'rush(n and Hr. Hillis E the City Staff. ~
' i Mr. Amoroso mov d to appcovc tl~e inures of the N vember 28, 1988 meeting
of Council.
1 Mr. Sutphen s onded the motion.
Tl~e vote - Mr Strip, yes-; Hc. ankowski~, yes; r. Sutphen, yes; Mr. ,
- Rozanski, ye ; Ms. Maurer, ycs• Mayor Close, yes; Nr. Amoroso, yes.
Mayor Close repeated the Council Rules oC Order as they pertain to Public
~I llearings.
~ 1
Ordinance No. 102-88 - Ordinance Providing foe a Change of Zoning on
115.755 Acres Located on the Nortli Side oC Tuttle Road, East o[ Interstate
270. Public (tearing. '
~s
Mr. Harrison Smith and Nr. Jim llauk registered as proponents.
~ There were no r@gistered opponents. -
Mr. Bowman had the following comments:
1
1. The subject site is 115.7 acres.
2.~ The site is Located on the northeast corner of I-270 `and Tuttle Roads.
3. the property abuts tl~e western office portion of the~Llewellyn Farms '
development and the Borror Corporation office property.
4. To the north are residents Lu Hashington Township; on the west side
of the site is I-270 and a 20 acre parcel whicli5+as annexed to
" Columbus.
~1 5. Qn the south side oC Tuttle Road is additional Land in Columbus and ~ 11M
it is expected to be used Cor commercial and apartment uses.
-
6. Tlie property was recently reclassified to the R-Rural District; the
' applicant is requesting zoning into the Planned Cpmmerce District. •
jl 7. Showed slides of the site. -
i ~
i, 8. The site in the Dublin portion is major mall use development; it is
1'.' expected to include approval and construction of an intecchange at
Tuttle Road which will be developed at the developer's expense.
9. In conjunction, tl,e City of Columbus will be doing improvements to
Tuttle Road. ,
LO. Uublin intends to work with property owners to provide a northward
connection from the subject Fite onto Rings Road.
11. Lt is now a very good zoning package that should result in a ficst- i
class office park, complete with coordinated Landscaping. '
12. The deed restrictions will cover the building Facade; signage,
materials and elevation. i -
13. The plan starts with less Intensive offices against the properties on i
Frantz Road and becomes progressively mocc lntensc, resulting in
large, corporate signature-type office buildings along I-270.
:i 14. StaEE recommended approval. '
L5. Tl~c Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval, subject to 3
one condition - that inEocmation regarding phasing, pedestrian bike
L£nks, utilities and applicable deed restrictions•be required as part
- of the composite and will be provided to the staff prior to sub-
~ mi65iOR of the actual development plan. ~
• ~ ~ 99-1082 _
. ~ Rezoning
• Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
_ RECORD OC PROCEEDINGS
~lt•t•rlh.
~liuulc'x t~~ Dublin City Council' Hcctiag _
fV7lIJl4~ Nwlim vl (:~alAJas C•ul~., talc, O. roan No. Itl7•':;
y ~ 1
f/t•/t/ December 19, 1988 151
I !
Page Two
l
i•
Mr. Harrison Smith, using a visual aid, described ttlelconnection of the
l~6 ~ roads, and how in the futuce they could possibly connect to Avery Road,
j Coffman Road, etc.
1 Hr. Smith pointed out that Clle construction of the interchange will be
1 entirely private with the. approaches to the interchange ali in the City
IIII of Columbus. .
Mr. Strip wondered about- safeguards; iE~CrafEic studies or Feasibility
studies had been done, especially as regards peak times.
~ Mr. Harrison Smith commented that they had mixed uses, the multi-family
being reverse Elow to oEEice tr:lC(ic.
Hr. Smith also indicated that there have been discussions with the City of
j Columbus regarding the improvement of Frantz Road with fouc lanes south
of Tuttle Road but that nothing definite had been determined. .
There will be a Third Reading oC the Ordinance at the first Council meeting'
in January. ~ j
!
1
Ordinance No. 111-88- Ordin nee Providing for a C ange oE~Zoning on 2. 94'
Acres Located on the Nocth est Corner of Dacby S reel and High Stree
i~ Public licaring. ,
!
' There were no cegistece proponents oc oppose ts. l
~ Mr. Bowman's comments were as E'ollows:
1. The site is 2. acres located immedi tely west and to the north of the;
existing Oubl n Library in Old llub n. !
2. The property was owned by the Boa of Education fora umber of
years and d eded to the City in 87.
i~ J. The proper y is cucrenCly zoned -2, Limited Suburba' Residential
District.
4. The requ sled classification ouid be SO, Suburban Efice and
Instftu Tonal District on wh ch a library is a pe matted use. i
I{ 5. Showe slides of the site. '
6. The oject was reviewed the Architectural R view Board in Novembe r
The xpansion was appcov as submitted.
.1 7. Th a was some discussi n about a canopy which was to be one of the
a ernate bid items. a ARB requested than iE the canopy were dropped
~ s an alternate that the plans be rc-reviec~ed. !
8. taff recommends approval. '
ij 9. The Planning Commir~ion unanimously recojlimended approval with a ,
number of Conditiohs: ~
1 ~
A. Llith the final approval oC the City Engineer that all storm water]
control me.~hanisms be improved f'or the entire site.
B. That sag age comply with the Cdde and the Formal review of the
Architc tural Review Board. '
! C. 11ith r gard to street trees there was discussion changing the
' crab pple to another species.
0. Thcr will be a f.iCtll condition when reviewed by the Kashington ~
!ai To ship Firc Ocpartmcut.~
- E. I was agreed tllaC tllc reed maple trees on tllc site would be ~
placed to another ty of tree. ~
' F. here was discussion egarding investigation as to how this
piece could~llnk up o other bike and pedestrian trails.
a
There ill be a third and fi L reading of the Ordinance on Januacy 3, 1989.'
99-1082
Rezoning
• Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's
' ~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
tllieudes t~( Dublltt City Council Meeting al<~cTut~
N.tt....t c~ta.t~ c«v_ cots_ o. r.... K.. ta~r+
tlcld January 16, 1989 ~c~
Page TWo
Joann ZipE Parks and ecreation Committ 1986,1987 1~
Deborah Baker Parks and Recreation Committ a 1988
Randall Hood gs Archlte ural Review Board 1985-1987
Mayor Rozanski, peaking on behal of Council, thank d the above named
citizens Eor th it tireless and o ten thankless res nsibilities and work
as members of a various boards commissions and mmittees.
Correspondea
There were objections to a equest for a one ay liquor permit for a ' .
function to beheld at OCLC o February 4, 1989 by the Columbus Literacy
Council.
Ordinance No. 102-88 - Ordinance Probiding fora Change of Zoning on
115.755 Acres Located on the North Side of Tuttle Road, East of Inter-
state 270. Public !tearing and Third Reading.
There were no registered proponents or opponents.
Vote on the Ordinance - Hr. Sutphen, yes; Hr. Amorose, yes; Nr. Strip, yes
Mayor Rozanski, yes;.Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Ordinance No. 18-88 - Ordinance utlining Requireme is for Private Fire
hydrants. Th rd Reading.
Mc. John Sed ock, Hashingtott T reship Fire Inspect r, had the Following
comments re arding the Ordina e:
1. The or ginal intent of t e Ordinance was to ccomplish two things -
color ode the hydrants o distinguish betty en private and
muni pal hydrants for aintenance purpose as well as establishing
a un form color code; he Ordinance also as designed to provide the
gui elittes for mainte attce of those priv to fire hydcants.
2. Th ugh researching her communities i Central Ohio it was determine)
t t in most commun ies the private E're hydrants are ignored..by
t e Fire Department
3. n Dublin the Fire Department works th building owners and building
ngineers to make ertain that the drants are of proper size, have
proper flow, as 11 as proper plat ettt.
4. With regard to r cord keeping, the Fire Department has not had a
problem with in ccucate record or log keeping, and there has not been
a problem with private fire hydr nt maintenance.
r. Sutphen reque led that Council ote on the Ordinance this evening.
• Mr. Jankowski as ed if the enforc nt provisions were sufficient to
_ achieve the obj ctive to make ter ain that the private hydrants are
identified and aintained.
Mr. Sutphen s id that he felt at the Safety Committee believed them to
be so.
. It was pain d out that fail a to comply with the Ordinance would
"trigger" the Same penaltie that are provided generally in the Fire
Code.
Vote on the Ordinance was as follows: Hr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes;
Hr. Sutphen, yes; Hrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes;
Mr. Amorose, yes.
99-1082
' Rezoning
Tuttle Crossing PCD Subarea A4
McDonald's/Kinko's