Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout034-90 Ordinance '. RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank Co. Form No, 30043 Ordinance No. n..m~_4-:-_90 Passed nnnnunnn" .......nnnnu.....19..n AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING ON A 34.818 ACRE TRACT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RINGS ROAD AND INTERSTATE-270. RO BE REZONED FROM: R-1A, RESTRICTED SUBURBAN RESI- DENTIAL DISTRICT (current Washington Township zoning) TO: SO, SUBURBAN OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, ~of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the following described real estate (see attached legal description marked Exhibit "A"), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned to SO, SUBURBAN OFFICE AND INSTITU- TIONAL DISTRICT, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21-70 (Chapter Eleven of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2. That application, Exhibit "B", including the list of contiguous property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Exhibit "C", are all incorporated in to and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this 20th day of Aubust , 1990. 7 '-'-, />~ ,/ '- ' . <"_/ .?:: /1"'" /~~~/pre.s- ing~;icer Attest: /J _~A7 ~. ~UL,J C erk of Coun il Sponsor: Planning Department 1 hereby certify that co~:es of this Od'nlll1ce/RIt{llhm,n were posted i the (ity of Dublin in accordance w','b Sect' on 731.25 of the Ohio Revised C de. /1 ~ < k/tNJ2<7 . ? Clerk of counci~blin. Ohio ... - '"" CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT FOR P&Z C Use Only OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ZONING Application No: DISTRICT MAP ZM 2.90 -e>oY (Reclassification of Land) Date Filed: ~.).~/5'O Fee Receipt No. Received by: --;1f ?11;~~ Please type or print information - Use additional sheets as necessary TO THE HONORABLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant F. A. Kohler Co. (, )(Have property in contract) l? contract being the owner s),/~f property located within the area proposed f~r future development in the SO category, , requests that the following described land to be placed in the Suburban Office and Institutional District (Chap 1159) . A. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED 1. General Description of Land (describe by one of the following): a. Lot(s)/Reserve(s) of , a recorded plat, with an area of . b. Beginning at a point along (street or other) and being feet in a N SEW direction from the (specify) of (Street or other), and thence having a dimension of from the (specify) of (street or other), and having an area of . c. The tract of land containing 34.818 Acres and bounded by: Rings Road (specify) on the N ~(Circle) 1-270 (specify) on the ~ E W (Circle) Tuttle Crossings N\tJ quadrant (specify) on the R S RxW (Circle) Melville Swanson tract (specify) on the NxSxR W (Circle) d. Attached legal description: YES x NO Page 1 of 3 .. . ... Map of Proposed Zoning District Boundaries Two (2) copies of map accurately drawn to an appropriate scale (to fill a sheet of not less than 8% x 11 inches and not more than 16 x 20 inches). The map shall be identified and submitted in addition to the General Description of Land. The map shall include all land in the proposed change and all land within five hundred (500) feet beyond the limits of the proposed change. To be shown on the map - all property lines, street right-of-way, easements and other information related to the location of the proposed boundaries and shall be fully dimensioned. The map shall show the existing and proposed Zoning District or Special District boundaries. List all owners of property within and contiguous to and directly across the street from such area proposed to be rezoned. The addresses of the owners shall be those appearing on the County Auditor's current tax list or the Treasurer's mailing list. NAME ADDRESS - see attached list of property owners B. ARGUMENTS FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF THE DESCRIBED LAND 1. Proposed Use or Development of the Land: presently unspecified development of use specified in Suburban Office and Institutional category. . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS and SPECIAL DISTRICTS submission of three (3) copies of a Development Plan and other documents and two (2) copies shall be retained as a permanent public record if approved. For other Zoning Districts, such plans or other exhibits would be helpful to the review of this application. Plans and Exhibits submitted Plot Plan ; Building Plan ; Development Plan ; Sketch ; - - - - Photographs - ; Other (specify) 2. State briefly how the proposed zoning and development relates to the existing and probably future land use character of the vicinity. This tr act is identified as Suburban Office (SO) on the preliminary land use plan for tho arc;:J,. Thc Tuttlc Cro:::;:::;ing:::; intcrchm.ge Ln.!5 h,El.cle lal.d iu the immediate vicinity of the interchange developable, and the proximity to both the ;:J,djoining frccH ;:J,Y, Ring:::; nO<J.d, and the ineel cLar.ge 11Ieal. tl1i5 parcel is presently ripe for development. Development in this c ate gory will be in harmony with both under',; <J.Y and anticipated de vclopmelJ:t 01. surrounding parcels. utili ties are planned and will be availablel:D the parcel, as is effecti V8 and docir;:J,blc rO;:J,dH<J.Y LlCCC:::;3. Page 2 of 3 pages ~ . 3. Has an application for rezoning of the property been denied by the City Council within the last two (2) years? YES NO x If Yes, state the basis of reconsideration C. AFFIDAVIT Before completing this application and executing the following affidavit, it is recommended that this application be discussed with the Building Inspector to insure completeness and accuracy. Present owner of property: Paul R. Smith and Dorothy Smith, 5655 Rings Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 APPLICANTS'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, I (:we ) Christopher T. Cline thp- attoITlP-Y for t:hp- C3pplir.C3nt: C3nd being duly sworn, depose and say t~.~.k~e s e being duly sworn, depose and say that * land included in the application and that the foregoing statement herein contained and attached, and information or attached exhibits thoroughly to the best of my/~ ability present the arguments in behalf of the application herewith submitted and.that the statements and attached exhibits above referred to are in all respects true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. C~ 0- ( ignature ~ Christopher T. Cline Attorney for F .A. Kohler Co., Applicant 37 West Bridge Street Dublin, Ohio 43017 (Mailing address) 614-766-0425 (Phone) 1GiZ -M ~ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~.;{... day of 1-<< eLM. y) , 19 . j' V/I ./ , .~.. . . / /' . THOMAS G. CLINE ('/'7~ ,~,~ IIY CO::~~UBlIC. STATE OF OHIO '-" (notary Public) EXPIRES AUGUST 30, 1992 Person to be contacted for details, if other than above signatory: Christopher T. Cline (Name (Address) (Telephone) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Do not write below thIs-IIne)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - D. RECORD OF ACTION 1. Withdrawn Held to (Date) (Date) 2. P&Z C: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modif ied 3. City Council: Date of Hearing Approved Disapproved Modif ied D~~~ ~ ~~ ~ D____ - ---. fJe & '-' I ~ ( 'Y ~ /f / -s.::... <, "1'2.. f:/...::J) ~ J "n..:..> J'-;if.::J .5..... f 4- ~anuc.::'-Y E. :S9C ~ES:R:F~ION O? 3'.E1E ACRES SC~TH OF RINGS R:hD ~EST OF INTERSTATE R8~~E 27C ~;"SEINGTON TOWNSHIF, OHIO situated in the State of Ohio, county of F::.-anklin, Township of Washington, being a part of Virgin~a Military survey Numbers 3011 and 2419 and being all of that tract of land as desc::.-ibed ir a certificate of Transfer to Paul Ra)~ond smith and Dorothy May Smith, of record in Official Record 02106Bl: (all .references herein bein; tc the records located in the Recorder's Office, Franklin Co~nty, Ohio), and being mo::.-e par"'cic-.:.:~:::-lY describec as ~olloWs: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Rings Roac, 60.00 feet in width, at the northwesterly corner of said smith tract and at the northeasterly co::.-ner of that 7.218 acre tract of land as described in a deed to Mel,-ille E. and Shirley Ann Swanson, of record in Deed Book 1827, Page 17~, said point of beginning b~ing referenced by a railroad spike located North 60 30' 29" west, a distance of 0.36 feet; Thence North 7Co 11' 03" East, along the centerline of Rings Road and the northerly line of said smith tract, passing a state of Ohio highway monument at 1,003.67 feet I (centerline new Rings Road P.c. Station 13 + 56.79) a total ' distance of_l,293.56 feet to an angle point in the old centerline of Rings Road, the northerly line of said Smith tract; Thence North 790 49' 03" East, continuing along said : old centerline and said northerly line, a distance of 205.10 . I feet to a point in the westerly limited access right-of-way : I line of Interstate Route 270, located 150.00 left of Station I I \ 622 + 9 8 . 3 1( FRA - :2 7 0 - 3 . 4 7 N) : I Thence south :L20 46' 38 "East, along said li:!!'.ited access right-of-way line, a distance of 673.51 feet to the southeasterlY corner of said Smith tract, the northeasterlY corner of Reserve "c" of Tuttle crossing Northwest, the plat of which is of record in Plat Book 71, Pages 33 and 34, said corner being located 150.00 feet left of station 616 + 24.80 and referenced by an iron pin found located North 820 461 .. 39" East, a distance of 2.42 feet; ~ Thence along the common line between said Smith tract and said Reserve "c" the following two courses; 1. south 620 46' 39" West, a distance of 244.04 feet to an iron pin found; 2. South 40 59' 01" West, a distance of 588.82 feet to an iron pin found in the northerly line of Lot _ 2 of Tuttle Crossing Northwest; . Thence south 830 24' 31" West, along the northerly line .' ~_" of said Lot 2 and the northerly line of Reserve "A", a distance of 1,175.71 feet to an iron pin set at the . southwesterly corner of said Smith tract and at the southeasterly corner of the aforementioned 7.218 acre tract; O..J lie- -/j, 1 0 1)/6-- /J -. /41 ~\ ~t' 0 -r / ~.":\,.,.-."\ If v ~ )~. '.",L" \, ~.-----:(\:.. >:,,'\, \'~ ;.>\'.:>~",'\ \ \ ~ ~ ,~"~.",.\.~').~ ;,"'1........... \ \ ~ ;.." "Ii"'. ~....., , ,r', \ \ l':,~..\- _.,".)....J ,.!\., "."....,Q :' ."y---~" \;':.\\~t.'v'"' \ ~~\;,.'JJ" ~. - :JI:S C::':?".:" =- ::n: C ~ =... E :. E h :::r-.=E PAGE "- ""'n' ". ........~ cC ." I' t"es- a-' one ....h..c ...este....' v ' ~ ne ..enc€po..,-~",t..' ...~ ...~ ... ....., ... .. wc:ytlf _-'-.....L~ c~ sai~ Sre~~~ trac~ a~~ thE:' easterly line of said 7.218 acre ~ract, a distance of ~40.35 feet to the point of beginning and containln~ 34.818 acres of land. Bearings herein are bas~d on a bearing of North 120 ~6' 38" West for the centerlinf- of lr:terstate Route 270 as designated by State of Ohi~ highway plans for Tuttle Road Ir::,erchange (FRJ..-270-15.C3). f i Iron pins set consist of a 1" O.D. iron pipe, 30" long with a plastic cap stamped "M-E BLDG CONSULTl-.NTS". Thir cescription was prepared by M-E Building Consultants, Inc., civil Engineering D:vislon, based on information obta~ned ~rom an actual field survey of the premises and fro~ records C~ the State of Ohio and Franklin County. M-E BUILDING CONSULTANTS, INC. I CIVI~). ErNr~ QSISION I BY t. .;\~ ~~(' Jtj , obert S. wynd Registered surv RSW/lw/89319034.8l8 """""'''''',,, ,,\' <: 0 P '1"1 ,,' ,I" L- /1 'J , \ ...... V / " .... ..' ". rv' "'_ ,,' '?-.' ...r T '. / " " J.... .' nG~,..n "'/'. = V) .: (' ". 0 -: =: OJ. '.: I = . . : I = : \lr:t~D : ~... : :: .)r . l' c:;, : : ~ ". (' S-BOn <c,:' ; ~ '~ U' "'.c I '\ ~ <<:-..' <<- .-- " /.... S ..' .' "', u ......., \) ...... ". ,7 I, ~ '\ .... "1 ., \-- ,\\ """"111...1,1' I . \ .oJ. '__.. I I I I I I II - . .... The applicant/owner hereby acknowledges that approval of (~ (its) request for rezoning to SO Category by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said applicant. The City of Dublin will make every effort to have these services available as needed. However, the rapid growth of the City of Dublin and Northwest Franklin County has stretched the City's capacity to provide these services to the limit. As such, the City of Dublin may be unable to make all or part of said facilities available to the applicant until some future date. The undersigned hereby acknowledges and understands the foregoing. 2/26/90 Date On behalf of: F.A. Kohler Co. Applicant - \ I I , I \ . CHRISTOPHER T. CLINE I ATTORNEY AT LAW , 37 WEST BRIDGE STREET , DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 AREA CODE 614 August 20, 1990 766-0425 The Hon Jan Rozanski, Mayor The City of Dublin , 6065 Coffman Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 re: Smith Rezoning, Ordinance Z-90-oo4 SW Corner Rings Road and 1-270 Dear Jan: The above ordinance comes on for third reading tonight. There is a minor problem which I feel I can set out best in this letter rather than in discussion before council. You may recall that I alluded to it at the second reading. As you know, Coffm an Road will P.ass through this parcel on its way to Tuttle Road. The Dublin thoroughfare plan provides for an 80' ROW for tJlis road, but there has been discussion (see the Coffm an Road Study) of making the Coffm an Road extention a 112' ROW. Immediately to the south of this parcel, in the City of Colum bus , the road (Britton Parkway) is an 80' ROW. At P&Z, the staff report initially read that the dedication for Coffm an Road would be in accord with the thoroughfare plan and that the City would determine the amount and location of the dedication. However, prior to discussion, Pat Bowman orally modified the staff report to read that the dedication would be in accord with the thoroughfare plan and the amount and location would be negotiated with the applicant. Unfortunately, when the minutes were transcribed, Pat's modification of the staff report was omitted, and it appears in the minutes that the action of P&Z was in accord with the original version of the staff report, not the modified version we agreed to. The vote of P&Z, conditioned on the staff report, was correct; it is just that the explanation in the minutes of what the staff report contained was incorrect. I have listened to the tape of the meeting, and Pat's statements are very clear, so I do not feel that there will ultimately be any problem with P&Z amending the minutes the correct the oversight. I would simply request that in your action tonight, you act on the ordinance as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, rather than specifying the conditions for approval. That way, once P&Z has amended their minutes to include the ommitted modific ation of the staff report, the record will be correct for both the City and the applicant. (J;ulY Yours, topher T. Cline CTC:pq Encl-O cc: Bobbie Clarke - . 'i I I - '?\J~('"'". -- '6:::.. I PUD t: II /"R-2k~ :t- ,--1 \. t::'L.Fi ~ . ~ II . III "iT r. ~ =;::'~. I'?\)\) . b ! 7F ~ . IL . · Fii= 6 : I . I' R-4 " r -r- -1 \ _ puo ~ R-~ =-- ~ ~:: ~" === !y/ I t "A-_ " R "/I )]1 ~ ~l/-r 1 j,,'0 ;- ~ _ J~ '''-~ R ~;UD i= ,.\Il~ \A-\ ~~~., \ tP" \_~;11 PUD 1 - / ~~. ~\ rL--~~ ~ ~ ~/J ~i ~ =1 '___'" . (i'~ -- v ~ :J() . pco' PCD ~:s: ~~ . ..", I . ~~~~ II'-(;~ , . ~~""""l.' U ,.....41 \ "- . T'>'<.r'l< P \1 I , ~ ,\ Ll ~y~~(~ r p. - CB " ;""- . \ S ... R-2 ' . " \ " D - ' 1=.. i ..._~. " \ . ) ......cc ~-.,( B ~I _~T- W r--.. ~t) .. .. .d2 I 1 " I to- rP" \:::: RI r-.. ':L CC If-' II"~ '-- ~I1 ' ,II h I r. _ -- I'- " P U D. ,wCC ...,; "'" \ --l;;\1 ~ R. . p..:~:-' - '- '"l~ '- I ~E-C i _~/ ,...., ~' RJ · RI /; T (( I - -...I.i.. KI2 ~. iE '\ _ I-' RI l.::t .I..;~ ;;;;0-" , .. _ --" SO ,,\ " ~ _ . : LI :I-f--:':~"'- - P U D.,.,. g H= ~(f \ 1 . , 11 1F- R :t, . " -- "'" "':JL' 1- rF=11 1 II 0 T..,...,-rT I _..: j' ,PUD - 7/ .11 .. , ~ ..' ---' ..- "-.' '-' I -. /;' I I .1R /-'. --. U ~ Y1 ~ J },,/1' __"' . ,_ ,,~' , OLR' ~J f/'" b' -, R :::: -=- /;/1 : _ ~.~~ ?-, \ ~ l,.: !:::.!. I I , ~. I . ",~,--- \ - ,-. . ,I ' ' , \ /:: 1 ~ &~ '\ ; \ . ' ,.~\'G" ~ \\ \il'\ !:,N\\"~~t-... cc ,sO~~r- 'N" l~ . \ \",! "-. ~ 1/ ...- I.., ~ ~ \ ' ' , ". - --"--- .,"0< , fL \ \: /" ' \ J. . \ ' \ .~~ ~ l __. A I---.~ ...... I \ 1 \ PCD \ puy t=: l ' ~ \ II' \ ,\11= , \ \ \ ,\ .....-------- \ .. :::, · \= ,....-/' ,. I - · - "l ,\ \ \ ' \ 00 · p' -= ~,---~ ~-J.-r \ ,I' '\' \ ..d >- ,.___...~ II .......'------' ~ ~...... ,"," \ · pub' R.. I H:: >- ~.l...\\'\ . ' ":' .. \ ~\ ~ i \ J~''''' I ~,\ I'. ~ '\ '. \,' ___, .~ I=\h \ II \r- \ ~ \;. \, . -/ ~~. \, ~ 'V"J~ , 1 .... . ---- \ ." ' ." , fL r ~ " .. ' ,,_Cl · :'1-' \ -"" \ . ' "-- , Ff2l}--l \' , r I -rr '.>- ,\ _~ \ . ~ 00" -nr . -'" , .. ~~ ' -, I" \ . \ ~ ---.- V'-~ i : ~ ---.-' , ,\ =.&f'" ,~ '--~.. - ) !, --------- -.- ----.;~ ~;-" ~ ( ~..{lo.~t1 ,. ~~ I ' ,.,._~ ""qO ,,~ '\,. I ~ II '/ ~ · '"^"" ',- \ \ T 1 ~ 4@ ..' ~~. '-'" ~SO r- ~OO-ObL 02 . ~ o r~ 6' -0 ~ - .~ ~ r ,111 :;; ~ _ ~o :rr- ~ .oIN. 0 ~ ~ ~.....OI ~ Q.. o (> ooq!D::::>..... :::I -- c:-J t3 Vl f.i N u: It >-Oo>!:1..,=t ~ _ 8 m!nz~ OI~ ~ =- _ ~"">-ogo N f) ~ Q- I I W ~ ~Y.t~~~ ..J 0 fl ~ t::l :( urN a: -0 D:: ~ ~ Offi~x CJ a.. z '~iD< tIl :?; ..... Z 3........lL. ~C>~o -0 ~5aso t.)~ ~8 , a: _ lA.I ItHERSiA1t. R~1t. ~O_ - ~ - ~ - - 'I I ! ~ I~~ ~ ROB ~i~ !li!1II ::Jw !~ F8 ~ ~~ -- ~z 'S'I'I'A ~d lt~ I S~i\ (/l~ m. ~~ ~~ 5~ oil ...... ~uJ =i. -z:a: z -v 13 Zct i5 0 w 1'1..,9 o A::) LU +1 " Z t:1 0 E(o - < 0 ~ N ~ i= ...... -..; ~ tlC w ~E ~ elelelel ~.~ ~ I .... ~ we 5 55 M a.. ~ m ~>-~el <~<< ex " 0 W 8 0< .D::.::t ..,.~ w I' lL ;:!:200 ....110:: 0:: CJ I . N >-Z< co. o~ o i:!i=~"" ~..,.::t..: ct IJJ ;<~ :> :5 0 ';;:;- ~ I I ..J uJ W ili ~ <~ ..,. a: CJ ~ o a..oa..1") ~ It 0>- J-I:O a ~ I ----~ :r ."oP r'I ~ Z NOIStGOO AVUWd NQIJlI8 CDSCIdOW LL ;>;: fa D::~ ~~~ - - - - -. <( :::I t.: 0 ~ \I') 1/1 2 lS :2 ~ ~~ ~i~ o - ~ ~ 0.. =~ ~ ~ >- 0:: :?E~9 ~t. f: S~10d lOh :3 _or c; :;:l ex.c::I: fib:: 1-11.. ~~-; ~ cr:: c!J ~;~ ! III I II W z >;: ~ f~~~ I ~ _ :zl\lcO i5 ~ .. (L Z -0 c.J 11I:1 ~itl~ O 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ . ~ iJ N ~=..J !loi i:I 11a1 :)cO::v: :i!-< I "d 0:::: OC ~ If) ~ I~ ~ (L ~ ~; ~ ~b Z~-(X)+ tht tf'UI/na,lf~ ,IP'~I/I'd/;"j ..frx- t:J,.. c}teu-.y. ~/ un t':J "n...... 2, '-/.8/8 e?:.. ae tu......r /0 c~ fed a+ -6/~ -:t 1( ilL), Ul-cg-f C!O/rJe.~ - rY' t;?/n~. kd ?rid Jnkr5-kJC.- i/:: ,/ ';;'.'/0 ,~ l r ,~ - I , / ~ ht ;el.4ned .pro"..,: /.~:i'll Cl/"'I .=trrf). 1~'Y.J~) 4t -1;/' .,..--,... ..... i /~./~,~ ..1- _ .~._ ' . '. .'." ." .,' , r,()I .' 1'/,_.' i,~ ~.<..:>~',ll"._i!i'J /'. ,i.I:,., I (~,::c: 2 )>F~/ C~~~ ~~i~ ~ ;": ~_ 0 (//.N,dl " ~L.~, I ~. At;?1 7/; r /1 Ilrl:/. )t '- li'~:rJ. ~ EfoJ ~'-o ~e:D : ~ Afll'L..I LA'r1 0':; K ~M- b~6d2.IPT\t),J 011"6 M.€A; WtP Exhibit "e" The Rezoning Application Z90-004 - Rings Road was passed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their regularly scheduled meeting on April 5, 1990. An excerpt of the minutes is as follows: "Mr. Kranstuber moved for approval of the rezoning application with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agree to plat and dedicate the right-of-way for Coffman Road as shown in Dublin's Thoroughfare Plan. The amount and location of the right-of-way will be determined by the City. To make the determination, the City will conduct a preliminary engineering study that will show how best to tie the planned Dublin boulevard section to the proposed typical selection of the road in the City of Columbus. 2. That the applicant agree to construct the extension of Coffman Road (three lanes) as proposed in the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. The issuance of a building permit for anyone development or successive developments totalling 250,000 square feet or greater will necessitate the construction of the road. In this event that building construction does not trigger the roadway construction, the property owner will be obligated to construct the road when the road is constructed north of Rings Road by others. 3. That the applicant dedicate right-of-way equal to 40 feet from centerline along the south side of Rings Road in compliance with the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Leffler seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mrs. Melvin, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. (Approved 7-0)." . Minutes of Meeting, April 5, 1990 Dublin Planning and zoning commission Page 9 Mrs. Melvin moved for approval of the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions: 1. Applicant is required to provide drainage detention as per MORPC guidelines as approved by the city Engineer. 2. Applicant's drive design shall be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall cooperate with the city Engineer to determine if a roadway ditch is needed and to build the resultant ditch as per the approval of the city Engineer. 4. The applicant shall build the proposed ditch along the north and east property line as per the direction of the city Engineer. Plans for this work must be approved by the city Engineer. Mr. Manus seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Melvin, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes. (Approved 7-0) In July of 1990, city Engineer Paul willis determined that the pavement width for Enterprise Court was appropriate and acceptable to his department at 32 feet. 5. Rezoning Application Z90-004 - Rings Road Mr. Bowman presented slides of the site and surrounding area along wi th information regarding the rezoning proposal as outlined in the Staff Report dated April 5, 1990. The site contains 34.818 acres (Smith tract) located at the southwest corner of 1-270 and Rings Road. It is currently zoned R-1A, Restricted Suburban Residential District and is located within Washington Township. The site is part of a large annexation which is still pending, and this application is contingent upon that approval by Dublin city Council. The applicant is proposing to rezone the site to SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District. This is consistent with the area plan which promotes office and mUlti-family uses along the main thoroughfares. with the extension of Coffman Road to the Tuttle Road Interchange reasonably assured, it is very likely that the property will attract higher density offices or large, single corporate users. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning request with several conditions listed in the Staff Report, with Condition #2 revised to "developments totalling 250,000 (not 150,000) square feet..." Mr. Chris Cline, attorney representing the F. A. Kohler Company, the applicant, generally agreed with the conditions listed in the Staff Report. However, he expressed concern about #3 regarding the dedication of right-of-way equal to 40 feet from centerline along the south side of Rings Road in compliance with the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan, stating that the applicant had agreed to provide the 40 feet at the point of the intersection with Coffman Road, but it may be difficult to widen the road any further because of the bridge. Mr. Bowman stated that if the Thoroughfare Plan is amended with Rings Road no longer being represented as a major road, the City will consider reducing the right-of-way dedication. with this provision, Mr. Cline stated his agreement with Condition #3. Minutes of Meeting, April 5, 1990 Dublin Planning and Zoning commission Page 10 Mr. steve Martin, 5685 Rings Road, demonstrated the location of his home with the proposed relocation of Rings Road abutting his side yard. He suggested moving the road southward, leaving the residential area as it exists today. Mr. Cline stated that the future location of the road is in no way affected by this rezoning. He stated that the relocation of Rings Road was done for the sole purpose of protecting and emphasizing single-family homes in this area and will continue to be the focus of future rezoning applications in this area. Mr. Bowman stated that the plan represents the concept, not the specific uses. What the new road represents (the one that goes diagonally and cuts Rings Road off) is way to carry the thru- traffic. Mr. Martin reiterated his request to have that road relocated southward through the commercial area. Mr. Cline again noted that this rezoning in no way determines the location of that road. The location of that road will basically be dependent upon the agreement of the various area land owners (i.e., Mr. Barney, residents along Rings Road, and Mr. Swanson). Mr. Bowman stated that the installation of the road may well be a municipal obligation, and the roadway configuration will continue to be examined with the intent to keep traffic off the western portion of Rings Road. Mrs. Melvin asked about the applicant's intention for development of the site. Mr. Cline responded that the applicant will most likely attempt to develop the site to the highest and best use possible, similar to what will be done across the freeway. He stated that high-scale "Metro Center-type" uses are likely next to the freeway with smaller-scale offices further west. Mrs. Melvin noted concern about restaurant use in this area. Mr. Tom Dalcolma, representing the applicant, stated that it is unlikely that there will be a stand-alone restaurant in that area. The intention is for this site to be developed with corporate, quality office space, out-parcel type development will be concentrated around the Tuttle Road interchange. Mr. Kranstuber expressed that as many citizens as possible in the area need to be contacted about proposed rezonings. Mr. Bowman agreed to meet with any interested citizens before this rezoning proposal is heard by City Council. Mr. Kranstuber moved for approval of the rezoning application with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant agree to plat and dedicate the right-Of-way for Coffman Road as shown in Dublin's Thoroughfare Plan. The amount and location of the right-of-way will be determined by the City. To make the determination, the city will conduct a preliminary engineering study that will show how best to tie the planned Dublin boulevard section to the proposed typical selection of the road in the City of Columbus. 2. That the applicant agree to construct the extension of Coffman Road (three lanes) as proposed in the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. The issuance of a building permit for anyone development or Minutes of Meeting, April 5, 1990 Dublin Planning and Zoning commission Page 11 successive developments totalling 250,000 square feet or greater will necessitate the construction of the road. In the event that building construction does not trigger the roadway construction, the property owner will be obligated to construct the road when the road is constructed north of Rings Road by others. 3 . That the applicant dedicate right-of-way equal to 40 feet from centerline along the south side of Rings Road in compliance with the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. Mr. Leffler seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Leffler, yes; Mr. Berlin, yes; Mr. Manus, yes; Mr. Geese, yes; Mrs. Melvin, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. (Approved 7-0) . 6. Concept Plan - Proposed Phase 44 Muirfield village Mr. Bowman presented slides of the site and surrounding area along with information contained in the Staff Report dated April 5, 1990. The. subject site, currently zoned R-1, is located to the north and east of the corner of Avery and Brand Roads. The site contains two separate parcels with a combined acreage of 44.3 acres and surrounds the former Gasbarrow/Pi home on three sides. The applicant maintains that the 37.9 acre tract is subject to the provisions of the original General Warranty Deed of Muirfield village. The applicant proposes to develop the site with 75 single-family lots, and if the concept is favorably received, will proceed with rezoning to the PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Staff favors the Concept Plan because single-family land use at the density proposed is very consistent with the area. Several issues requiring resolution prior to rezoning were outlined in the Staff Report for discussion purposes. Mr. Mack expressed the importance of compliance with the flood protection regulations and noted that he is not sure the br idge shown on the plan would be permitted. Steve Lenker, the applicant of Muirloch Development Company, stated presented a plan board of the proposal. He stated that the 37 acre parcel was made subject to the provisions of the General Warranty Deed of Muirfield village in March, 1989. He added that the Muirfield Association Board of Trustees had determined in a meeting earlier that week that the 6.5 acre parcel would not be subject to those provisions at this point in time. Mr. Lenker addressed the issues raised in the Staff Report as follows: -Loop circulation pattern vs. single curb cut - needs additional review prior to determination being made. -Treatment along Brand Road - should be mounded and landscaped with a minimum of 50 percent opacity. Minimum setback of 100 feet is shown on plan and would be in addition to 20 percent of lot depth. -100-year floodway shown on plan was taken from latest maps available with no delineation between floodway and floodway fringe areas shown. Tuttle Crossings Smith Tract; 34.818 acres SW corner Rings and 1-270 Property Owners List Chakeres Land Co. c/o Pete T. Mallis 1266 W. 3rd Ave Colum bus, Ohio 43212 Frank F. Thorn as Marian Thorn as 10070 Warner Road Plain City, Ohio 43064 Wm. Marvin Thorn as Trust BancOhio National Bank, Trustee c/o James Cushman, Attorney 52 East Gay Street Colum bus , Ohio 43215 Dorothy Thorn as 5494 Cara Court Amlin, Ohio 43002 Dublin Invesbnent Co. c/o Tim Kelton, President Ruscilli Realty Company 2041 Arlingate Lane Colum bus , Ohio 43228 Duke Associates No. 70 Ltd. 8888 Keystone Crossing Suite 1201 Indianapolis , Indiana 46240 Ruth E. Thorn as 5679 Post Road Du blin, Ohio 4301 7 Melville E. Swanson Shirley Ann Swanson 5671 Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 Tuttle Road Limited 941 Chatham Lane Colum bus , Ohio 43220 Ashland Oil Company 5200 Blazer Parkway Dublin, Ohio 4301 7 . Fe bruary 26, 1990 We have reviewed the foregoing land use application and agree to its being submitted and processed for approval by the City of Dublin. We are the owners of the land in question, but are in contract to sell to the F. A. Kohler Co. f ~ AI . /~~/nu:d)v (1 11 , ) Paul . Smitn ;" ..0 i~~ ,. . -,", ",' /',- ,,'.- 'n 1,,/ ., L~~~ / , -/{,J-?,y Doro hy Smith - a ~ I it! -t .JI:JI ... -I... Ii"' ... - [)o~z \J 5l~~ :x:".; c 5 /0. E Y5 paLt:.~ ~ d~ o~~ :u . . . . -- '1J ~c 0 i~~ ~~ lI' 0..< rn ~~i Zlfl U\ -Ie:: 0;:11 ---- :E< 2~ D BAmlN PMl<WAY EXlDlSlON cf\lJ\ :I: I ~-o -----1 I DJd z ~ii 103 -<-1 ~ ~"tIO"tl 0 0 CJ~ ~~~ ;u . 1'1 IT1 I I ~~or:< ~~I m:D :"":;;t-~'" ~~ 0 [;J;:O ~.~ >z ~~ ::1 ~ ~o~ g '" ... ~ . >0 q -.II " :D >>> (Ilo-<~ lD 0 ~~~g ""'~~~ ~ -0 l.t.l" 0 "0 (Il (Illil (Il m ~ - r . ::KJ ~ '0"'" :i! 1"1 CJl ro 1+ 0:;0 o m ~ 6"'"rn c 0 1"1 N ~ ;bO i2 ~~ z ::IJ2 .c rT1Cl' C./' ~~ z~ i~ II! ~CIl I ; JOll PI 2tfi-- - ~ ~~ ~c ClIilj ~~~ a 01 I\) .c ~q ~ ~ I It ~ - - -%- - - - 3lno~ 3lV1S~31tU OLt - -, ( ( 0- (J'I ,:/ n . '.;o~ ~ 0- ::P 0 r i~~~ rr1 N - 8- ;: :~~ ~ 'f r\J !~~ 0 - ~ D NDRrIl ~ i~~ , ::tI" .J:. Vl~ 0- 0 f'j . Z.CfO-oo'"