The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About065-87 Ordinance Amended RECORD OF ORDINANCES National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. ~ Form No. 2806-A Ordinance No. _________(t5-_87 (Amended) Passed_ --- ------------- ___19 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH WANDEL & SCHNELL, ARCHITECTS TO PREPARE DESIGN SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR A COMMUNITY SWIM- MING POOL WHEREAS, the Village of Dublin has previously entered into an agreement with Wandel and Schnell for a swimming pool study; WHEREAS, the final report for this study has been received by the Village; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Village of Dublin to have a pool constructEd by the summer of 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Village of Dublin, State of Ohio, 6 of the elected members concurring: Section 1. That the Acting Village Manager and Finance Director be, and hereby is, authorized to enter into a contraCT With Wandel and Schnell, Architects to prepare design specifications and engineering for a community swimming pool at the Earlington Park site; and Section 2. That the quotation from Wandel and Schnell in an amount not to exceed $86,300.00 be, and hereby is, accepted. Section 3. That said design specifications should be completed to allow for sufficient time to receive bids and complete construction by the summer of 1988. Section 4. That this Ordinance be, and the same hereby is, declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the public health, safety and welfare, and therefore, shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. Passed this 6th day of July , 1987. ~ Mayor - Presiding Officer Attest: --1 Y!t ~ ~, Clerk of Co ncil Sponsor: Mr. Joseph Jankowski, Jr. , Council Member . . of tttis Ordinance/Resohrttnn , hereby ce~lfy htha~"~::SOf Dublin in aCCOfGJ"CC ..ith were posted IA tel . Section 131.~ of lhe Obio R"'sed;~ J~YJ;' Cttr\ of Coline" . to 0 P 0 "<:>000 0 0() '" C) c 0 \ -........... - <:Ie Y)~""" ~" - I ~~ g.~ ~ I 1 0-1 ~: 0 0 0 ~<'b 0.0 0 c:t \, - ':> <:) ..., )- ~ ~ ~- -j; ~ ; \~ 00 00 00 0 0 l:)Q 0 E:) 0 , -...~ "" () ""'I I j ~ \~ \.-1.... -.... _' L >- ~~ 0 ~ -.9 ' t.:) rI\ ~ - "- o ~ roo 0 0 0 1 00 t:) 0 0 ~ . <:) ~ ~_ C) "":7_ ' ~ .01 '-.......0 ~ ",- ~ I ,.... '" "'-.. I.b (tl cs c") 1:- { ~ ~~ - ~ .~ - "- oJ (~ -~ oJ) 0., 0 0 D ~\ 0 .0 0 C - 0 ~ . 0_ "l. ''''') Q...... 'V) I 1 ~ ~ \.? V) 0- 0 i:J - , :::2. ':): dO ~ ::::: (") "'0 ~~ ~'u <:) 0 0 "2 ~ g<g 0 ~ CJ I . ~ Q ..sl ~ -..D_ ~ E ~ y,.....sl. v) 00 k- I \ . "0 (,'\ _ n c:>o o ""- -. ~ "'2 :i I O.c 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 (;) 0 <t:.. Q J::- J:- _ <:I k'- _ i -4J ...; y,- ~- 0 -D ';z- , ":' &lO rf\ n a) 0- ) )..... - o 0'0 0 0 cb "^ 0<:1 0 0 ../ .0 '"0 ClO 0 _- QO (. ",,'" - , - - 0 . J ..,,~,::o "" ~ -....... &: oo~ ? r'll - ~ -- log r/J D8 g ~ 0 0- t"'\ -- 0 -) cr- u- "- , _...... _ - ,.. c;lo <:"l> . v.J """ 0 ~ · .0 ;;.. J\?:r- ~ 0 --- ~ J \,J) ~ . " ~t -:-) ~ 0 0 0 .g ,.!. ~ ~ a 0.... ~ : 0 ~ t:"': ~ ~ ~ r '" ~ - -.. - C'lS "'- Q ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~i"" "- .' - . JO" 0 ~.. . . :s. '9..J '::I a . n ~ _ -J ~"% ....)- a ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ l' \~ ~- g Q.. - \- .;.& q;' '" ~ Ii '; ~ ?::- -:. ......:! ~ oo.::r u 0 ~ -') ~~ ~ ~~ v ., * *=' *' '* "-~ .v_ '-- ~ i: . . F I HAL REPORT j SWIMMING POOL FACILITY i Dublin, Ohio May 13, 1987 r ; To: Dublin Recreation and Parks Committee i Willia. Andrews, Chairman ( From: Wandel & Schnell, Architects, inc. ( i 43 West Long Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 I This report will be divided into three parts. The purpose I I of this report is to give the Recreation and Parks Committee ! a tool to use in determining the ~pe, size and location of swimming pool to be owned and ope'ated by the municipality. This report is a summary of work done over the last six months with the Committee and the Architect. The Architect has presented several site plans to the committee that were useful in understanding the scope of the , project. These plans were not to be conclusive. They.were to be used as tools to assist the decision process. . . PROGRAM ASSUMPTIONS Community Size r Three sizes of communities were considered. The municipal boundaries, the school district and the geographic limitations. As this will be a municipal i pool the boundaries of Dublin were considered as the population that this pool would serve. The present population of Dublin is 8000. The future or projected population is 20000. The population of Dublin was a1so- considered without the 2700 residents of Muirfield Village as they have there own pool and may be less.- likely to use the municipal pool. i Possibly a more realistic boundary would coincide with the that of the School Board. These boundaries extend I into the city of Columbus east of the Scioto River~ ,- ; Using the school bou~daries a population of 35000 is - i I realistic. Of further support to using this population. is that the City of Columbus has not provided recreation facilities for swimming in the northwest quadrant of the coun ty. A negative for using this population is that the facility will be used by non tax payers. It may be realistic to assume that Columbus may someday build a swimming pool in this area. A third way to gauge the quantity of people who will use the pool is to evaluate the geography. This method would take into consideration the difficulty of getting from Sawmill Road to Coffman Park for example. As the site is not finalized this method of determining pool usage was not considered. FINAL REPORT May 13, 1987 Page 2 l To size the swimming pool a population of 12000 was con- r s1dered. This will allow some growth in the community. I It also suggests tha t the popul a t1 on served 1 s wi thi n the,. \ city boundaries. However while the city and school district grow the pool will be of adequate size to handle i the present population and some growth. I ( Type of Swimming Pool j The pool can either be designed for competition or rec- reational swimming. A competitive pool has specially designed gutters to prevent wave action and most import- . . . antly has specific minimum depths. The recreational pool. . considers different capabilities, ages and activities. Competitive Pool The summer swimming season is generally swum in metric ! lengths. Therefore the design of the pool needs to be in i lengths of either 50 or 25 meters. If seri ous competi t- . . I ion is desired only a 50 meter pool should be considered. I However a 25 meter pool could also be considered for i younger ages and as a warm up pool. The 50 and the 25 I meter pools should have eight lanes for racing. The min- imum depth of a racing course is 42 inches. This allows enough water for turns. Recreational Pool These pools are designed without competition .in mind~ these pools are designed for the water experience. Of major consideration in a recreational pool is water. depth and access to the pool. Very shallow water (12 inches) can be enjoyable to young mothers and there young children. As the average height of an adult is fi ve feet ten inches to design a pool with only 60 inch deep water would mean most of the people would not be able to, touch bottom without bobbing. As many children unti 1 they become teenagers do not reach 5 feet the depth of water needs to considered for there enjoyment. The pool needs to be designed to various depths so people do not have to swim or tread water to enjoy the pool. Diving Pool In either a recreational or competitive pool diving may be considered. For municipal pools in this area that are not committed to competition platform diving should not be considered. The two most popular diving heights are one and three meters. These heights allow for some competition, but are mostly recreational. For reasons of safety diving boards require a lot of room and therefore are not as efficient in swimmers per square foot as other - areas of the pool. However diving bays are usually considered as an attraction. This is the most costly part l of a swimming pool because of its depth. I ( FINAL REPORT I May 13. 1987 Page 3 f I Wading Pool f This is a pool usually separate from the others for the use of very young children. The depth will vary from o inches to 12 inches. Parents also use this pool as f they supervise there children. Spray Pool I These pools are used purely for recreation and provide- different water experience. The can be used by young and old. They can designed to simulate standing under a- ! waterfall or walking in a heavy mist. They can be used as a visual and functional attraction. Support Facilities Parking Parking should be designed for at least 10 percent of I amount of people during peak attendance. Peak attendance is a aboQ~ 3Q percent of the potential users or members. [ This means at some times the lot will be fu 11 . It is best to try to share a parking facility with another user such as a school. l Concessions This facility provides a designed service for the swim- mer but it also provides a maintenance issue for the pool. The location. rules and types of food can min- imize the trash. The types of food should be considered as easy to prepare. store and save. Usually a vendor is consulted for the best items to include on the menu. Active and Passive Areas Active games such as basketball and volleyball can be considered and seem to be natural extensions of swimming as recreational act i vi ty . Passive areas for sun bathing and chairs for lounging should be considered. The lawn areas should be kept away from the water for maintenance reasons. Different lawn areas should be considered for different age groups and interests. I 1 . r l FINAL REPORT May 13, 1987 [ Page 4 4..": r Bathhouse Historically bathhouses are places to change clothes. I Today bathhouses are usually not designed to have attend- andts who check in and out your street clothes. There I are several reasons for this, one is economic in the sense of staff, space and liability and the other is i social. As a culture it is much more acceptable for us to drive from home to the pool in our bathing suit. Without changing facilities the bathhouse becomes the - entry control poi nt, the place for a first aid area, the pool office, a place for life guards to relax, pool storage and toilets for the bathers and staff. i PROGRAM I I The program decided upon by the Committee is to provide a recreational pool that could be used for some compet- . itive events. The emphasis would be on recreational with I consideration of those interested in lap swimming. The population to be served by this pool would be between.- 8000 and 11000. i SWIMMING POOL i Wading 1200 - 1600 Square Feet Swimming 6500 - 7500 Square Feet Diving 1200 - 1600 Square Feet I' DECK AREA 10000 - 15000 Square Feet I SUNNING AREA 50000+ Square Feet I BATHHOUSE l Entry (control) 535 Net Square Feet Office/Records 150 I Guard Room 270 i First Aid 150 I Pool Storage 300 Toilets 420 Pump Room 450 Concession 600 Total Net Area 2875 Total Gross Area 3740 : PARKING 100 - 150 Cars , FINAL REPORT Hay 13, 1987 ! Page 5 i r COST ESTIMATE I Swimming Pool $284,800. - $342,400. .. Deck Area $ 75,000. - $112,500. , , Bathhouse $224,400. - $243,100. i i Parking $ 50,000. - $ 75,000. Landscape $ 50,000. - $ 75,000. Utili ti es $ 15,000. - $ 15,000. Contingency @ 5% $ 34,960. - $ 43,150. Owners Costs @ 10% $ 69,920. $ 86,300. - I I TOTAL $804,080. - $992.450. , I I I r i i i I . FINAL REPORT May 13, 1987 I Page 6 I SITE SELECTION I In considering the location of a municipal pool there were two major issues. One was that the land be presently owned I by the City and the other that the site be as central to the selected population as possible. Added to these two main I issues was the availability of utilities, topography, access \ and existing natural features. With the Committee's help I the site selection was narrowed to two, Coffman Park and I Earlington. I Coffman Park This is and has been the major developed municipal space in the city. It has the City Hall, Maintenance Dept., Salt Shed, Police Station, Historic structures, tennis courts, picnic grounds, shelter houses and other park amenities. The land is el shaped with the knuckle congested with the maintenance facilities. Also in this area is a severe change in contours and a stream. To develope a pool at i Coffman Park would require a master plan for the park I developement and probably some long term commitments to how , services are to be provided. The construction cost of the facility may be slightly higher should the master plan I dictate than the pool be built in an area of topographic j change. I Earlington This is a piece of land bounded on the south by a new \ street, Earlington and on the north by Brand Road. It is west of Coffman. The land is flat without distinguishing characteristics. On this site an elementary school will be built and parking can be shared. This site is easily developed for a pool and a master plan has been designed by Smith Associates. t.. HEMORANDUM TO: Dublin Village Council Members FROM: Jame, F. Olau'en~ DATE: May 12, 1987 Franklin County is proposing to reconstruct the bridge on Dublin Road, just north of Marion Street. We would like to initiate a cooperative effort with the County for the replacement of this structure. Dublin's share of the design costs (roadway and right-of-way only) amount to $12,648.00 of a total consultant contract amount of approximately $30,000.00. Construction is tentatively scheduled for spring-summer, 1988. Construction and right-of-way costs would be appropriated at a later date. There are no good construction cost estimates currently ava ilab Ie. Franklin County is requesting this appropriation be passed as an emergency so that design may begin as soon as possible. Copies of our correspondence with the County are attached for your information. JFO: fmu