Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 22-13RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank. Inc. Ordinance No. fldinq �J 22 -13 Form No.30043 Passed 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 28.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HYLAND -CROY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,030 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH BRAND ROAD AND MITCHELL - DEWITT ROAD, R. RURAL DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (CELTIC CROSSING PUD) TO ESTABLISH A " -LOT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 8.75 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE (CASE 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, _ h of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description marked Exhibit °A'�, situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2 . The application (Exhibit "B'�, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission (Exhibit "C'�, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3 . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this S�A— day of l 2013. L -h' May e e)ding O fficer ATTEST: C Mff RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank. Inc. Ordinance No. fldinq �J 22 -13 Form No.30043 Passed 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 28.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HYLAND -CROY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,030 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH BRAND ROAD AND MITCHELL - DEWITT ROAD, R. RURAL DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (CELTIC CROSSING PUD) TO ESTABLISH A " -LOT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND 8.75 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE (CASE 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, _ h of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description marked Exhibit °A'�, situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto. Section 2 . The application (Exhibit "B'�, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission (Exhibit "C'�, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3 . This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this S�A— day of l 2013. L -h' May e e)ding O fficer ATTEST: C Mff Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 City of Dublin Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 - 410 -4490 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager \X — Date: April 4, 2013 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 22 -13 — Rezoning Approximately 28.1 Acres on the West Side of Hyland -Croy Road, Approximately 1,030 Feet North of the Intersection with Brand Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing PUD) to Establish a 44 -Lot, Single - Family Detached Residential Development and 8.75 Acres of Open Space. (Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP) Summary Ordinance 22 -13 was introduced at the March 11, 2013 City Council meeting. This is a request for review and approval of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan from R, Rural District to Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing PUD), and a Preliminary Plat for 28.1 acres to establish a 44 -lot, single - family detached residential development with 8.75 acres of open space. Tree Replacement Waiver Council expressed concerns about the inclusion of modified tree replacement requirements within the proposed development text as opposed to a separate tree waiver request as is typically processed. Council requested the tree waiver language be removed from the text and the proposed waiver be considered as a separate agenda item at the second reading. The applicant has provided a revised development text with the Preliminary Development Plan. The text now states that, "Tree replacement shall be per Code unless otherwise approved by City Council." (Refer to page DS -2 in the attached Preliminary Development Plan packet.) Upon further discussion with staff, the applicant has elected not to pursue a tree replacement waiver with the rezoning and will instead continue to analyze the feasibility of accommodating replacement trees on site with the final development plan approval. Any subsequent proposal to modify tree replacement requirements will be brought back to Council as a formal tree waiver request and will be reviewed according to the standard criteria typically used for these requests. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 22 -13 at the second reading /public hearing on April 8, 2013. Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 City of Dublin Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 - 410 -4490 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager \X — Date: April 4, 2013 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 22 -13 — Rezoning Approximately 28.1 Acres on the West Side of Hyland -Croy Road, Approximately 1,030 Feet North of the Intersection with Brand Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing PUD) to Establish a 44 -Lot, Single - Family Detached Residential Development and 8.75 Acres of Open Space. (Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP) Summary Ordinance 22 -13 was introduced at the March 11, 2013 City Council meeting. This is a request for review and approval of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan from R, Rural District to Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing PUD), and a Preliminary Plat for 28.1 acres to establish a 44 -lot, single - family detached residential development with 8.75 acres of open space. Tree Replacement Waiver Council expressed concerns about the inclusion of modified tree replacement requirements within the proposed development text as opposed to a separate tree waiver request as is typically processed. Council requested the tree waiver language be removed from the text and the proposed waiver be considered as a separate agenda item at the second reading. The applicant has provided a revised development text with the Preliminary Development Plan. The text now states that, "Tree replacement shall be per Code unless otherwise approved by City Council." (Refer to page DS -2 in the attached Preliminary Development Plan packet.) Upon further discussion with staff, the applicant has elected not to pursue a tree replacement waiver with the rezoning and will instead continue to analyze the feasibility of accommodating replacement trees on site with the final development plan approval. Any subsequent proposal to modify tree replacement requirements will be brought back to Council as a formal tree waiver request and will be reviewed according to the standard criteria typically used for these requests. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 22 -13 at the second reading /public hearing on April 8, 2013. Preliminary Development Plan CELTIC CROSSING D u b I i n. O h i o Land Owner/ Land G /arming/ Developer Legal Landscape Architecture Engineering Stavroff Interests, Ltd. Smith and Hale The EDGE Group EMH & 565 Metro Place South, Suite 480 37 W Broad St, Ste 725 330 West spring Street, Suite 350 5500 New Albany Road Dublin, OH 43017 Columbus, OH 43215 Columbus, OH 43215. Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: (6l 4) 764 -9981 Phone _(614)221 -4255 Phone :(614)486 -3343 Phone :(614)775 -4500 Contaa'. Kevin McCauley Contact _ Ben Hale,Jr. Contact : Greg Chlllo9 Contact Brad Holland Approved Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2073 Submittal City Council 2S d Reading April 8, 2073 Preliminary Development Plan CELTIC CROSSING D u b I i n. O h i o Land Owner/ Land G /arming/ Developer Legal Landscape Architecture Engineering Stavroff Interests, Ltd. Smith and Hale The EDGE Group EMH & 565 Metro Place South, Suite 480 37 W Broad St, Ste 725 330 West spring Street, Suite 350 5500 New Albany Road Dublin, OH 43017 Columbus, OH 43215 Columbus, OH 43215. Columbus, OH 43054 Phone: (6l 4) 764 -9981 Phone _(614)221 -4255 Phone :(614)486 -3343 Phone :(614)775 -4500 Contaa'. Kevin McCauley Contact _ Ben Hale,Jr. Contact : Greg Chlllo9 Contact Brad Holland Approved Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2073 Submittal City Council 2S d Reading April 8, 2073 CELTIC CROSSING SECTION I — Development Overview I. LOCATION AND SIZE II. EXISTING COMMONS AND CHARACTER III. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES IV. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE V. PROVISION OF UNUTIES VI. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Table of Contents SECTION II — Development Standards SECTION III — Exhibits 130-1 I. DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS DS -1 PDP-1 REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP Do-1 II. PERMITTED USES Ds -1 PDP -2 VIONITY MAP DO-1 III. DENSITY Ds -1 PDP -3 BOUNDARY MAP /SURVEY DO-1 IV. LOT STANDARDS DS -1 PDP -4 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Do-1 V. SMEETACCESSAND /OR DS -1 PDP -S TREE SURVEY UST& ANALYSIS DO-2 IMPROVEMENTS PDP -6 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE RAN VI. STREET STANDARDS DS -1 VII. UMMES DS -1 1/3 TITLE SHEET& INDEX MAP VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT DS -1 2/3 PRELIMINARY PAT IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL DS -2 3/3 UTILITY /GRADING RAN AND REPLACEMENT X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE DS -2 XI. ARCHITECTURE DS -2 XII. LANDSCAPING DS -4 XIII. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DS-5 CELTIC CROSSING SECTION I — Development Overview I. LOCATION AND SIZE II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CHARACTER III. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USES IV. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE V. PROVISION OF UNUTIES VI. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Table of Contents SECTION II — Development Standards SECTION III — Exhibits DO-1 I. DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS DS -1 PDP-1 REGIONAL CONTEXT MAP Do-1 II. PERMITTED USES Ds -1 PDP -2 VICINITY MAP Do-1 III. DENSITY D6 -1 PDP -3 BOUNDARY MAP /SURVEY DO-1 IV. LOT STANDARDS DS -1 PDP -4 EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP Do-1 V. SMEETACCESSAND /OR DS -1 PDP -S TREE SURVEY UST& ANALYSIS DO-2 IMPROVEMENTS PDP -6 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE RAN VI. STREET STANDARDS DS -1 VII. UMMES DS -1 1/3 TITLE SHEET& INDEX MAP VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT DS -1 2/3 PRELIMINARY PAT IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL DS -2 3/3 UTILITY /GRADING RAN AND REPLACEMENT X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE DS -2 XI. ARCHITECTURE DS -2 XII. LANDSCAPING DS -4 XIII. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DS-5 SECTION I- Development Overview SECTION I- Development Overview CELTIC CROSSING Location and Size • The site is located completely within the City of Dublin and Union County. • The site is located approximately 1,030' north of the intersection of Brand and Hyland -Croy Roads, immediately west of Hyland -Croy Road and Dublin Jerome High School Stadium malpractice field. • The site is ±28.110 acres in area, measuring ±758' in the north/south direction and ±L682 in the east west direction. Existing Conditions and Character • The site is rectangular in shape. • The site is located in the North Fork Indian Run Watershed. Thesite generally drains from north to south. Highpoints are located at the northwest comer (elevation 942) and northeast comer (elevation 936) A low point (elevation 930) is located where an existing stream flows off the property along the southern boundary. • Astream bisects the property north to south, with 1/3 of the site east of the stream and 2/3 of the site west of the stream. A stream condor protection zone with a buffer of63' on both sides has been designated for this stream. The site is located entirely out of the 100 year floodplain. Tree rows and brush line the perimeter of the property and the stream • 380 trees exist on the site, 13 of those are landmark trees. Of the 380 trees,121 (32 9 /6) are dead or in poor condition,2 are landmark trees in poor condition. The site is generally flat; there are no steep slopes on the site. No buildings exist on the site. III. Existing and Proposed Land Uses • The Dublin Community Plan- Existing Land Use Map designates the site as "Rural Residential /Agricultural" and "Vacant/Undeveloped" • Surrounding land uses include: Residential Low Density (unincorporated properti es south of the site), Parks /Open Space (Glacier Ridge Metro Park) and public Institutional /Civic (Dublin Jerome High School). The Dublin Community Plan - Future Land Use Map classifies the site as "Mixed- Residential/Rural Density (1.5 d.u/ac.). Proposed uses are residential, open space and parks. The proposal is to develop the tract with 44 single - family lots for a gross density of 1.56 dwelling units per acre. IV. Parks and Open Space A total of 8.75± acres ( +31.1 %) will remain free of development and will include the required Hyland-Croy and Mitchell -Dewitt Roads setbacks and the storm water management facilities. The open space areas will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a private home owners association. V. Provision of Utilities General All utilities, including sanitary sewer, water, telephone, eleckic, and gas, are avaaable at this site. All utilities will be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer. A comprehensive storm water management system will meet City of Dublin design criteria. • All utilities shall be placed in appropri ate locations on the lots that will best preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition. Sanitary Sewer • Sanitary sewer to the Celtic Crossing development will be serviced from an existing 12 -inch sanitary sewer (CC- 12770) located on the east side of HGand-Croy Road. • An 8-inch sanitary sewerwill be extended across Hyland-Croy Road from existing manhole 17 to service the entire proposed development. Development Overview Water • Water service to the Celtic Crossing development will be serviced from an existing 16 -inch water main located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road. • An 8-inch water mainwill be extended across Hyland-Croy Road to service the entire proposed development. • Public water mains will be constructed along the proposed roadways within the development. Storm Water— Existing The site drains from north to south and is tributary to an existing un named ditch that runs though the eastern dmd of the property. 29 acres of offsite area drains from the north across the site to the ditch mentioned above. • The predominant soil type is Brookston, a Type B/D soil which will function as a Type C soil. The secondary soil types are Blount and Crosby, Type C soils. All will have a pre - developed runoff curve number of70. Storm Water —Post Developed • hthe post - development condition the site drainage will be handled by two separate storm water management systems. One system will be located on the east side ofthe existing ditch and the other will be located on the west side ofthe existing ditch. Both systems will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs, and sidewalks and some back yard drainage. The west system will be two wet basins connected by a shallow swale. Bui s system will have a tributary area of approximately 13.6 acres. Bui s system will outlet into the un-named ditch that runs though the proposed site. The east basin will be a wet basin that will have a tributary area of approximately 4.3 acres and outlet into the un-named ditch that runs though the proposed site. • Approximately 27.8 acres of offsite area from the north may be directed to the existing ditch via an off -site Swale or rear yard swales on the north side of the property . DO -1 CELTIC CROSSING Location and Size • The site is located completely within the City of Dublin and Union County. • The site is located approximately 1,030' north of the intersecti on of Brand and Hyland -Croy Roads, immediately west of Hyland -Croy Road and Dublin Jerome High School Stadium malpractice field. • The site is ±28.110 acres in area, measuring ±758' in the north/south direction and ±L682 in the east west direction. Existing Conditions and Character • The site is rectangular in shape. • The site is located in the North Fork Indian Run Watershed. Thesite generally drains from north to south. Firebrands are located at the northwest comer (elevation 942) and northeast comer (elevation 936) A low point (elevation 930) is located where an existing stream flows off the property along the southern boundary. • Astream bisects the property north to south, with 1/3 of the site east of the stream and 2/3 of the site west of the stream. A stream condor protection zone with a buffer of63' on both sides has been designated for this stream. The site is located entirely out of the 100 year floodplain. Tree rows and brush line the perimeter of the property and the stream • 380 trees exist on the site, 13 of those are landmark trees. Of the 380 trees,121 (32 9 /6) are dead or in poor condition,2 are landmark trees in poor condition. The site is generally flat; there are no steep slopes on the site. No buildings exist on the site. III. Existing and Proposed Land Uses • The Dublin Community Plan- Existing Land Use Map designates the site as "Rural Residential /Agricultural" and "Vacant/Undeveloped" • Surrounding land uses include: Residential Low Density (unincorporated properti es south of the site), Parks /Open Space (Glacier Ridge Metro Park) and public Institutional /Civic (Dublin Jerome High School). The Dublin Community Plan - Future Land Use Map classifies the site as "Nlixed- Residential/Rural Density (1.5 d.u/ac.). Proposed uses are rest dential, open space and parks. The proposal is to develop the tract with 44 single - family lots for a gross density of 1.56 dwelling units per acre. IV. Parks and Open Space A total of 8.75± acres ( +31.1 %) will remain free of development and will include the required Hyland-Croy and Mitchell -Dewitt Roads setbacks and the storm water management facilities. The open space areas will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a private home owners association. V. Provision of Utilities General All utilities, including sanitary sewer, water, telephone, eleckic, and gas, are avail able at this site. All utilities will be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer. A comprehensive storm water management system will meet City of Dublin design criteria. • All utilities shall be placed in appropri ate locations on the lots that will best preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition. Sanitary Sewer • Sanitary sewer to the Celtic Crossing development will be serviced from an existing 12 -inch sanitary sewer (CC- 12770) located on the east side of HGand-Croy Road. • An 8-inch sanitary sewerwill be extended across Hyland-Croy Road from existing manhole 17 to service the entire proposed development. Development Overview Water • Water service to the Celtic Crossing development will be serviced from an existing 16 -inch water main located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road. • An 8-inch water mainwill be extended across Hyland-Croy Road to service the entire proposed development. • Public water mains will be constructed along the proposed roadways within the development. Storm Water— Existing The site drains from north to south and is tributary to an existing un named ditch that runs though the eastern dmd of the property. 29 acres of offsite area drains from the north across the site to the ditch mentioned above. • The predominant soil type is Brookston, a Type B/D soil which will function as a Type C soil. The secondary soil types are Blount and Crosby, Type C soils. All will have apre- developed runoff curve number of70. Storm Water —Post Developed • hthe post - development condition the site drainage will be handled by two separate storm water management systems. One system will be located on the east side ofthe existing ditch and the other will be located on the west side ofthe existing ditch. Both systems will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs, and sidewalks and some back yard drainage. The west system will be two wet basins connected by a shallow swale. T1ils system will have a tributary area of approximately 13.6 acres. Ths system will outlet into the un-named ditch that runs though the proposed site. The east basin will be a wet basin that will have a tributary area of approximately 4.3 acres and outlet into the un-named ditch that runs though the proposed site. • Approximately 27.8 acres of offsite area from the north may be directed to the existing ditch via an off -site swale or rear yard swales on the north side of the property . DO -1 CELTIC CROSSING VI. Access and Circulation • Vehicular access to the site will be from a single access point on Hyland -Croy Road and from a single access point on Nlitchell-Dewitt Road. • Celtic Crossing Drive will connect the access points along Hyland - Croy and Nlitchell -Dewitt Roads and extend through the site along the northern and westsm borders. • Macho Court will be a cul -de -sac street extending south from Celtic Crossing Drive on the eastern third of the development. • Nemain Court will be aloop street extending from Celtic Crossing Drive on the western two thirds of the development. Development Overview DO -2 CELTIC CROSSING VI. Access and Circulation • Vehicular access to the site will be from a single access point on Hyland -Croy Road and from a single access point on Nlitchell-Dewitt Road. • Celtic Crossing Drive will connect the access points along Hyland - Croy and Nlitchell -Dewitt Roads and extend through the site along the northern and westsm borders. • Macho Court will be a cul -de -sac street extending south from Celtic Crossing Drive on the eastern third of the development. • Nemain Court will be aloop street extending from Celtic Crossing Drive on the western two thirds of the development. Development Overview DO -2 SECTION II- Development Standards SECTION II- Development Standards CELTIC— CROSSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Basic development standards are addressed in this text regarding proposed density, general site issues, traffic, circulation, landscaping, and architecture. These component standards ensure consistency and quality throughout the development. Unless otherwise specified in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 152 and 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply. II. PERMITTED USES Permitted uses shall include the following: A. Single- familydetachedhomes. B. Open spaces and related park features. III. DENSITY A maximum of forty -four (ED residential homes shall be permitted in this PET). IV. LOTSTANDARDS Single - family homes in this development will be constructed on traditional lots with fee simple ownership. Specific lot standards shall apply to each of these development types: A. Fee simple lots 1. Lot Size a. Lot Area Twelve thousand six hundred (12,600) square feet rommoram b. Lot width at the right ofway line: Fifty (50) fi;et mimumum c. Lot Width at the building line: Ninety (90) feet minimum d. Lot Depth: One hundred forty (140) feet mirummn. bregul arly shaped lots shall have a mmmumum lot depth of 140 feet along at least one side lot line, provided that mirummn buildable depth requirements are met. 2. Lot Setbacks a. From yard: There shall be a mirummn front yard setback of twenty (20) feet from the right -of -way line or as shown on the approved preliminary plat. The requirements of the Subdivision Regulations Chapter 152.019(C)(6) shall not be applicable to this development. b. Rearyard: There shall be a mimumwmrearyard setback of twenty-five (25) feet as indicated on the preliminary plat. c. Side yard: There shall be a minimn side yard of six (6) feet for buildings, provided, however, that there shall be a mmmumum of fourteen (14) feet total side yard per lot. d. Hyland -Croy Road: There shall be a rrimm our building and pavement setback of two hundred (200) feet from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right -of -way. Storm water management facilities, landscaping, multiuse paths, open space, park structures and entry features may be located within this setback to enhance the rural character ofthe Hyland -Croy Road condor. e. Mitchell -Dewitt Road: There shall be a varying building and pavement setback of two hundred (200) feet from the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt Road right ofway east of the entry drive to fifty (50) feet from the proposed Nhtchell -Dewift Road right ofway west ofthe entry drive, as indicated on the preliminary plat. Storm water management facilities, landscaping, multi-use paths, open space, park amenities and entry features may be located within this setback to enhance the rural character of the road condor. 3. Lot Coverage The maximum lot coverage shall be forty-five (45) percent. 4. On Lot Stream Corridor Protection Zone a. Portions ofthe Stream Condor Protection Zone may be platted on individual lots. b. No building, structure, fence, patio, recreational or addetic facility, or any other improvement of any kind may be placed temporarily or permanently upon, in or under the area designated hereon as a "On Lot Stream Condor Protection Zone" nor shall any work be performed thereon which would alter the natural state of the zone or damage any of the trees or vegetation therein. c. No tree may be removed from the zone except for the removal of dead, diseased, decayed, or noxious trees and other moderate, vegetation or as may be required for conservation or in keeping with good forest management practices. Areas without trees or understory vegetation on the lot may be maintained as lawn. Development Standards V. STREETACCESSAND/OR IMPROVEMENTS A. Access 1. Hyland -Croy Road: a. One full access intersection shall be provided. 2. NHtcheIEDewitt Road: a. One fiul accessintersection shall be provided. VI. STREET STANDARDS A. Public Streets 1. Right- of-Way Width: Fifty (50) feetmimumwm 2. Pavement Width: Twenty-eight (28) feet minimum as measured back -of -curb to back -of -curb 3. Drive Lanes: Two (2) 4. Parking Lanes: Parking shall be permitted on one side of public streets internal to the RED opposite the waterline and fire hydrants. 5. Tree Lawn: Not less than seven (7) feet in width. 6. Sidewalk: Tom (4) feet wide mimumum; sidewalks shall be concrete. 7. Multiuse path: Eight (8) feet wide minimum; multi -use paths shall be constructed of concrete when located directly in front of single - family lots and may be constructed of asphalt when located elsewhere. VII. UTILITIES A. Design and Construction 1. All utilities shall be designed and constmctedto meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer. DS-1 CELTIC— CROSSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Basic development standards are addressed in this text regarding proposed density, general site issues, traffic, circulation, landscaping, and architecture. These component standards ensure consistency and quafity throughout the development. Unless otherwise specified in the submitted drawings or in this written text, the development standards of Chapter 152 and 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply. II. PERMITTED USES Permitted uses shall include the following: A. Single- familydetachedhomes. B. Open spaces and related park features. III. DENSITY A maximum offorty -four (44) residential homes shall be pemmttedin this PUD. IV. LOTSTANDARDS Single - family homes in this development will be constructed on traditional lots with fee simple ownership. Specific lot standards shall apply to each of these development types: A. Fee simple lots 1. Lot Size a. Lot Area Twelve thousand six hundred (12,600) square feet rommoram b. Lot width at the right ofway line: Fifty (50) feet minmum c. Lot Width at the building line: Ninety (90) feet minimum d. Lot Depth: One hundred forty (140) feet mirimmn. bregul arly shaped lots shall have a mmmimum lot depth of 140 feet along at least one side lot line, provided that mirimmn buildable depth requirements are met. 2. Lot Setbacks a. From yard: There shall be a mirimmn front yard setback of twenty (20) feet from the ri ght -of -way line or as shown on the approved preliminary plat. The requirements of the Subdivision Regulations Chapter 152.019(C)(6) shall not be applicable to thi s development. b. Rearyard: There shall be a mimimumrearyard setback of twenty-five (25) feet as indicated on the preliminary plat. c. Side yard: There shall be a mirarum side yard of six (6) feet for buildings, provided, however, that there shall be a minimum of fourteen (14) feet total side yard per lot. d. Hyland -Croy Road: There shall be a rrimm oun building and pavement setback of two hundred (200) feet from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right -of -way. Strom water management facilities, landscaping, multi -use paths, open space, park structures and entry features may be located within this setback to enhance the rural character ofthe Hyland -Croy Road corridor. e. Mitchell -Dewitt Road: There shall be a varying building and pavement setback of two hundred (200) feet from the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt Road right ofway east of the entry drive to fifty (50) feet from the proposed Mb4aell -Dewitt Road right ofway west ofthe entry drive, as indicated on the preliminary plat. Storm water management facilities, landscaping, multi -use paths, open space, park amenities and entry features may be located within thus setback to enhance the rural character of the road corridor. 3. Lot Coverage The maximum lot coverage shall be forty -five (45) percent. 4. On Lot Stream Corridor Protection Zone a. Portions ofthe Stream Corridor Protection Zone may be platted on individual lots. b. No building, structure, fence, patio, recreational or athletic facility, or any other improvement of any kind may be placed temporarily or permanently upon, in or under the area designated hereon as a "On Lot Stream Corridor Protection Zone" nor shall any work be performed thereon which world alter the natural state of the zone or damage any of the trees or vegetation therein. c. No tree may be removed from the zone except for the removal of dead, diseased, decayed, or noxious trees and other understory vegetation or as may be required for conservation or in keeping with good forest management practices. Areas without trees or understory vegetation on the lot may be maintained as lawn. Development Standards V. STREETACCESSAND/OR IMPROVEMENTS A. Access 1. Hyland -Croy Road: a. One full access intersection shall be provided. 2. NHtchel4Dewitt Road: a. One fiul accessintersection shall be provided. VI. STREET STANDARDS A. Public Streets 1. Right- of-Way Width: Fifty (50) feetrommum 2. Pavement Width: Twenty-eight (28) feetmirimum as measured back -of -curb to back -of -curb 3. Drive Lanes: Two (2) 4. Parking Lanes: Parking shall be permitted on one side of public streets internal to the RED opposite the waterline and fire hydrants. 5, Tree Lawn: Not less than seven (7) feet inwidth 6. Sidewalk: Tom (4) feet wide minmum; sidewalks shall be concrete. 7. Mudd use Path: Eight (8) feet wide minimum; rmilti -use paths shall be constructed of concrete when located directly in front of single - family lots and may be constructed of asphalt when located elsewhere. VII. UTILITIES A. Design and Construction 1. All utilities shall be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer. DS-1 CELTIC— CROSSING B. Location 1. All utilities shall be placed in appropri ate locations on the individual home lots that will best preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition. VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT A. Design and Construction 1. A comprehensive storm water management system shall be developed, following the City of Dublin storm water management policies. 2. Storm water management in the post development condition is anticipated to be handled by two separate systems: an "east system" and a "west system ". Both will accept impervious areas such as roadways, sidewalks, driveways, ro ofs and some backyard drainage. a. The "west system" shall be generally located along the souther property line and will include two wet basins connected by a shallow swale. This system will outlet into the existing unnamed ditch. b. The "cast system" will be a wet basin generally located east of the proposed cul -de -sac. This system will outlet into the existing unnamed ditch. IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT A. Tree Preservation 1. It is the intent of the developer to preserve as many good and fair condition trees as possible on site. A good faith effort will be made to preserve existing trees in good and fair condition where appropri ate. B. Tree Preservation Zone 1. A fifteen (15) feet wide tree preservation zone shall be established at the rear of all lots along the norther and wester property lines. This zone shall be indicated on the preliminary and final plats. 2. No tree or vegetation may be removed from the zone except for the installation and/or maintenance of utilities as approved in the final development plan, removal of dead, diseased, decayed, or noxious trees and other vegetation or as may be required for conservation or aesthetic purposes or in keeping with good forest management practices. Areas without trees or understery vegetation on the lot may be maintained as lawn. 3. No building, structure, fence, patio, recreational or athletic facility, or any other improvement of any kind may be placed temporarily or permanently upon, in or trader the area designated hereon as a "Tree Preservation Zone' nor shall any work be performed thereon which would alter the natural state of the zone or damage any of the trees or vegetation therein. 4. Disturbance ofaaypsm ofthe zone by maintenance shall be restored as nearly as practicable to the original condition. 5. A tree protection force, minimum four (4) feet in height, shall be installed around the perimeter ofthe tree preservation zone prior to any construction activities. The fence location shall be indicated on the final development plan and shall remain in place until occupancy has been granted or as otherwise approved by the City Forester for all lots, as indicated on the preliminary plat. C. Tree Replacement Plan 1. Tree replacement shall be per code unless otherwise approved by City Council. 2. The master developer shall be responsible for the replacement of all subject trees affected due to the development of the site. 3. All site required tree replacement must be completed prior to the issuance of the first building permit or within six (6) months, due to .favorable weather conditions. 4. All individual lot tree replacement must be completed priorto issuance of m occupancy permit or within six (6) months, due to .favorable weather conditions. X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 1. The open space will meet that required trader Code. All open space shall be dedicated to the City. All open space areas shall be maintained by a forced and funded homeowners association. 2. Access to the Metro Park will be provided, subject to Metro Parks District approval, by the extension ofmulti -use paths through open space areas of the project to the Metro Park. Access may occur within the stream condor protection zone. Final design for connections and associated screening shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. Development Standards XI. ARCHITECTURE A. General Character 1. The character of the development shall be one (1), one and one -half (15;) and two (2) story single - family homes with a variety of two (2) or three (3) car garages that will mirtric the quality of the surrounding homes in adjacent neighborhoods and will adhere to the City of Dublin Residential Appearance Standards Code. B. Permitted Building Height 1. Maximum of thirty- five(35) feet as measured per the Dublin Code. C. Permitted Exterior Materials 1. Cladding Materials. a. The exterior cladding of all structures on all lots shall be finished sing all natural materials, including bri ck, thin bri ck, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered wood, fiber - cement siding products, stucco or any combination thereof. b. Stucco shall be prohibited as a cladding material on all structures east of the stream and two lots nearest Muchell -Dewitt Road (Lots 1J, 23 and 24 as indicated on the Preliminary Plat). 2. Trim Materials. a. Wood, engineered wood, vinyl, aluminum, ElFS, copper rfiber - cementproducts. b. Shutters shall be considered as" him" for the purpose ofineeting the Residential Appearance Code requirements 3. Roofing Materials. a. Dimensional asphalt shingles, wood, slate, concrete, file or metal. D. Permitted Exterior Colors 1. Cladding Colors. a. Natural earth tones and/or warm neutral colors, including white. b. High- chroma colors are not permitted. 2. Trim Colors. a. Natural earth tones and/or warm neutral colors, including white. DS-2 CELTIC— CROSSING B. location 1. All utilities shall be placed in appropri ate locations on the individual home lots that will best preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition. VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT A. Design and Construction 1. A comprehensive storm water management system shall be developed, following the City of Dublin storm water management policies. 2. Storm water management in the post development condition is anticipated to be handled by two separate systems: an "east system" and a "west system ". Both will accept impervious areas such as roadways, sidewalks, driveways, ro ofs and some backyard drainage. a. The "west system" shall be generally located along the souther property line and will include two wet basins connected by a shallow swale. This system will outlet into the existing unnamed ditch. b. The "cast system" will be a wet basin generally located east of the proposed cul -de -sac. This system will outlet into the existing unnamed ditch. IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT A. Tree Preservation 1. It is the intent of the developer to preserve as many good and fair condition trees as possible on site. A good faith effort will be made to preserve existing trees in good and fair condition where appropri ate. B. Tree Preservation Zone 1. A fifteen (15) feet wide tree preservation zone shall be established at the rear of all lots along the norther and wester property lines. This zone shall be indicated on the preliminary and final plats. 2. No tree or vegetation may be removed from the zone except for the installation and/or maintenance of utilities as approved in the final development plan, removal of dead, diseased, decayed, or noxious trees and other vegetation or as may be required for conservation or aesthetic purposes or in keeping with good forest management practices. Areas without trees or understory vegetation on the lot may be maintained as lawn. 3. No building, structure, fence, patio, recreational or athletic facility, or any other improvement of any kind may be placed temporarily or permanently upon, in or trader the area designated hereon as a "Tree Preservation Zone' nor shall any work be performed thereon which would alter the natural state of the zone or damage any of the trees or vegetation therein. 4. Disturbance ofaaypsm ofthe zone by maintenance shall be restored as nearly as practicable to the original condition. 5. A tree protection force, minimum four (4) feet in height, shall be installed around the perimeter ofthe tree preservation zone prior to any construction activities. The fence location shall be indicated on the final development plan and shall remain in place until occupancy has been granted or as otherwise approved by the City Forester for all lots, as indicated on the preliminary plat. C. Tree Replacement Plan 1. Tree replacement shall be per code unless otherwise approved by City Council. 2. The master developer shall be responsible for the replacement of all subject trees affected due to the development of the site. 3. All site required tree replacement must be completed prior to the issuance of the first building permit or within six (6) months, due to .favorable weather conditions. 4. All individual lot tree replacement must be completed pri or to issuance of an accuparmy permit or within six (6) months, due to .favorable weather conditions. X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 1. The open space will meet that required trader Code. All open space shall be dedicated to the City. All open space areas shall be maintained by a forced and funded homeowners association. 2. Access to the Metro Park will be provided, subject to Metro Parks District approval, by the extension ofmulti -use paths through open space areas of the project to the Metro Park. Access may occur within the stream condor protection zone. Final design for connections and associated screening shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. Development Standards XI. ARCHITECTURE A. General Character 1. The character of the development shall be one (1), one and one -half (15;) and two (2) story single - family homes with a variety of two (2) or three (3) car garages that will mirtric the quality of th e surrounding homes in adjacent neighborhoods and will adhere to the City of Dublin Residential Appearance Standards Code. B. Permitted Building Height 1. Maximum of thirty- five(35) feet as measured per the Dublin Code. C. Permitted Exterior Materials 1. Cladding Materials. a. The exterior cladding of all structures on all lots shall be finished sing all natural materials, including bri ck, thin bri ck, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered wood, fiber - cement siding products, stucco or any combination thereof. b. Stucco shall be prohibited as a cladding material on all structures east of the stream and two lots nearest Mitchell -Dewitt Road (Lots 1J, 23 and 24 as indicated on the Preliminary Plat). 2. Trim Materials. a. Wood, engineered wood, vinyl, aluminum, ElFS, copper rfiber - cementproducts. b. Shutters shall be considered as" him" for the purpose ofineeting the Residential Appearance Code requirements 3. Roofing Materials. a. Dimensional asphalt shingles, wood, slate, concrete, file or metal. D. Permitted Exterior Colors 1. Cladding Colors. a. Natural earth tones and/or warm neutral colors, including white. b. High- chroma colors are not permitted. 2. Trim Colors. a. Natural earth tones and/or warm neutral colors, including white. DS-2 CELTIC- CROSSING b. Complementary or contrasting to siding color. 5. Roofing Colors. a. Roofing colors shall be from the color range ofnatural materials: such as, but not limited to wood shakes and black. b. High- cbroma colors are not permitted. E Architectural Elements 1. Four -sided Architecture a. Similar architectural design elements and details shall be consistent throughout all elevations of the structure. b. Dublin Residential Appearance Code will be adhered to throughout the entire community udess otherwise stated herein. 2. Chimneys a. °Cantilevered °or °through- the - wall° chimneys are not permitted. b. All chinmeys shall be built on an integral foundation. c. All exterior portions of chimney shall be finished masonry, consisting ofbrick, stone, and/or manufactured stone. 3. Garages a. All single - family dwellings shall have an attached or detached garage ofsufficient size to accommodate a rridmum two (2) standard sized automobiles, side by side. b. Lots Fast of Stream (Lots 1 -7) i. Side and court load garages are permitted. Single -bay front load garages are permitted as part of a court load configuration. n. Front loaded g ounces, not part of a court load configuration, are prohibited. iii. Auto court areas associated with court load garages require an upgraded pavement material, see Section XH Landscaping. m. Lots 1 and 2 as indicated on the preliminary plat are lirmted to west facing garages udess a single -bay front load garage is utilized as part of a court configuration. c. Lots West of Shc.(Lots 8 -44) i. Side, court and front loaded garages are permitted. n. Lots 23 and 24 as indicated on the preliminary plat are limited to north facing garages only and single -bay front load garages as part of a court configuration. d. Front loaded garages shall not extend beyond the foremost facade or Bred front porch of the home by more than six (6) feet. Not more than forty (40) percent of all lots shall be penned to include front loaded garages that extend beyond the foremost facade or covered front porch of the home. e. All garage doors shall be decorative and upgraded garage doors, similar to "earn doors. f In those instances where a garage is utilized and an auto courtyard is created in the front of the house; a minimum thirty (30) inch high wall or hedge shall be installed along the courtyard pavement parallel to the street. g. In those instances where a side loaded garage is utilized, a rommomm thirty-six (36) inch height, seventy-five (75) percent opacity hedge shall be installed along the entire length of driveway pavement, parallel to the rear yard, so as to prevent headlight pollution into the rear ofneighboring properties. 4. Prominent Facades a. Comer lots, end lots, pie - shaped lots and lots adjacent to large open spaces present highly - visible, side facades (Lots 1, 3, 8, 19, 20, 23, 24, 35, 36, 38 and 39 as indicated on the preliminary plats). Each street - facing elevation on these lots must contain at least three design elements, in any combination, as defined in the Dublin Zoning Code 153.190. F. Architectural Diversity 1. The same or similar front elevations shall not be repeated wi thin: a. Two (2) lots on either side of the subject lot. b. Three (3) lots directly across the street from the subject lot. c. Any lot on a cul -de -sac bdb. 2. Comer lot influence shall be determined separately by the front elevation orientation. 3. Open space areas may provide similar separation as lots within the influenced area. In this case, the open space area may be considered an influenced lot or lots. 4. Lots located on curves or comers may not share a direct line of site with the fronts of three lots across the street, depending on the front elevation orientation of nearby comer lots. In this case, an additional Development Standards lot or lots on the same side of the street as the subject lot may instead be considered an influenced lot, in addition to the two lots on either side fthe subject lot. 5. ALot Diversity Matrix shall represent the intended interpretation of the architectural diversity standards relative to the preliminary development plan and preliminary plat included herein. Changes to lot layout, count, numbering, size, shape and/or orientation oflots going forward shall require a modified Lot Diversity Matrix at the time of Final Development Plan or Final Plat. Any future modified matrix shall provide an interpretation of the architectural diversity standards that is consistent with the matrix included herein. G. Lot Diversity Matrix The Lot Diversity Matrix represents the intended interpretation of the architectural diversity standards. Subject Influenced Lot Lot 1 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 2 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 44 3 1,2,4,5,6,7 4 1,2, 3, 5, 6, 7 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 8west 9, 10, 38 east, 39, 42, 43, 44 8 north 39, 40, 42, 43, 44 9 8,11,12, 38 cast, 39 east 43 10 8, 9,11,12,13, 38, 39 east 11 9,10,12,13, 37, 38, 39 east 12 10, 11, 13, 14, 36 south, 37, 38 13 11,12,14,15,36,37,38 14 12,13,15,16,36,37,38 15 13, 14, 16, 17, 36, 37, 38 south 16 14, 15, 17, 18, 35 west 36,37 17 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 35 west, 36 18 16, 17,19, 32, 35 west 36 19 cast 17, 18, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36 west 19 north 20, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 40 20 19 north, 21, 22, 27,28, 29, 30 21 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 22 20,21,23,24,25,26 23 21,22,24,25,26 24 21,22,23,25,26 25 21,22,23,24,26,27 26 20,21,22,24,25,27,28 27 20,21,22,25,26,28,29,30 28 19 north, 20, 21, 26,27, 29, 30 29 19 north, 20, 21, 27,28, 30, 31 30 19 north, 20, 27, 28,29, 31, 32 DS-3 CELTIC- CROSSING b. Complementary or contrasting to siding color. 5. Roofing Colors. a. Roofing colors shall be from the color range ofnatural materials: such as, but not limited to wood shakes and black. b. High- cbroma colors are not permitted. E Architectural Elements 1. Four -sided Architecture a. Similar architectural design elements and details shall be consistent throughout all elevations of the structure. b. Dublin Residential Appearance Code will be adhered to throughout the entire community udess otherwise stated herein. 2. Chimneys a. °Cantilevered °or °through- the - wall° chimneys are not permitted. b. All chinmeys shall be built on an integral foundation. c. All exterior portions of chimney shall be finished masonry, consisting ofbrick, stone, and/or manufactured stone. 3. Garages a. All single - family dwellings shall have an attached or detached garage ofsufficient size to accommodate amidmum two (2) standard sized automobiles, side by side. b. Lots Fast of Stream (Lots 1 -7) i. Side and court load garages are permitted. Single -bay front load garages are permitted as part of a court load configuration. n. Front loaded g ounces, not part of a court load configuration, are prohibited. iii. Auto court areas associated with court load garages require an upgraded pavement material, see Section XH Landscaping. m. Lots 1 and 2 as indicated on the preliminary plat are lirmted to west facing garages udess a single -bay front load garage is utilized as part of a court configuration. c. Lots West of Shc.(Lots 8 -44) i. Side, court and front loaded garages are permitted. n. Lots 23 and 24 as indicated on the preliminary plat are limited to north facing garages only and single -bay front load garages as part of a court configuration. d. Front loaded garages shall not extend beyond the foremost facade or Bred front porch of the home by more than six (6) feet. Not more than forty (40) percent of all lots shall be penned to include front loaded garages that extend beyond the foremost facade or covered front porch of the home. e. All garage doors shall be decorative and upgraded garage doors, similar to "earn doors. f In those instances where a garage is utilized and an auto courtyard is created in the front of the house; a minimum thirty (30) inch high wall or hedge shall be installed along the courtyard pavement parallel to the street. g. In those instances where a side loaded garage is utilized, a rommarram thirty-six (36) inch height, seventy-five (75) percent opacity hedge shall be installed along the entire length of driveway pavement, parallel to the rear yard, so as to prevent headlight pollution into the rear ofneighboring properties. 4. Prominent Facades a. Comer lots, end lots, pie - shaped lots and lots adjacent to large open spaces present highly - visible, side facades (Lots 1, 3, 8, 19, 20, 23, 24, 35, 36, 38 and 39 as indicated on the preliminary plats). Each street - facing elevation on these lots must contain at least three design elements, in any combination, as defined in the Dublin Zoning Code 153.190. F. Architectural Diversity 1. The same or similar front elevations shall not be repeated wi thin: a. Two (2) lots on either side of the subject lot. b. Three (3) lots directly across the street from the subject lot. c. Any lot on a cul -de -sac bdb. 2. Comer lot influence shall be determined separately by the front elevation orientation. 3. Open space areas may provide similar separation as lots within the influenced area. In this case, the open space area may be considered an influenced lot or lots. 4. Lots located on curves or comers may not share a direct line of site with the fronts of three lots across the street, depending on the front elevation orientation of nearby comer lots. In this case, an additional Development Standards lot or lots on the same side of the street as the subject lot may instead be considered an influenced lot, in addition to the two lots on either side fthe subject lot. 5. A Lot Diversity Matrix shall represent the intended interpretation of the architectural diversity standards relative to the preliminary development plan and preliminary plat included herein. Changes to lot layout, count, numbering, size, shape and/or orientation oflots going forward shall require a modified Lot Diversity Matrix at the time of Final Development Plan or Final Plat. Any future modified matrix shall provide an interpretation of the architectural diversity standards that is consistent with the matrix included herein. G. Lot Diversity Matrix The Lot Diversity Matrix represents the intended interpretation of the architectural diversity standards. Subject Influenced Lot Lot 1 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 2 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 44 3 1,2,4,5,6,7 4 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 8west 9, 10, 38 east, 39, 42, 43, 44 8 north 39, 40, 42, 43, 44 9 8, 11, 12, 38 east, 39 east, 43 10 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 38, 39 east 11 9,10,12,13, 37, 38, 39 east 12 10, 11, 13, 14, 36 south, 37, 38 13 11,12,14,15,36,37,38 14 12,13,15,16,36,37,38 15 13, 14, 16, 17, 36, 37, 38 south 16 14, 15, 17, 18, 35 west 36,37 17 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 35 west, 36 18 16, 17,19, 32, 35 west 36 19 cast 17, 18, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36 west 19 north 20, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 40 20 19 north, 21, 22, 27,28, 29, 30 21 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 22 20,21,23,24,25,26 23 21,22,24,25,26 24 21,22,23,25,26 25 21,22,23,24,26,27 26 20,21,22,24,25,27,28 27 20,21,22,25,26,28,29,30 28 19 north, 20, 21, 26,27, 29, 30 29 19 north, 20, 21, 27,28, 30, 31 30 19 north, 20, 27, 28,29, 31, 32 DS-3 CELTIC — CROSSING 31 19 north, 20, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35 32 19,20, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35 33 19, 31, 32, 34, 35, 40, 41 34 32,33, 35, 39 north, 40, 41, 42 35west 18,19,32,33,34,36 35 north 19, 20, 32, 33, 34, 39 north, 40 36 west 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 east, 35 west, 37 36 south 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 35 west, 37, 38 south 37 12,13,14,15, 36, 38, 38 cast 8 west 9, 10, 11, 12, 37, 39 east 38 south 10,11,12,13, 36 south, 37, 39 east 39 cast 8,9,38,42,43,44 39 north 8, 35 north, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 40 8,19,34,35,39,41,42 41 33,34,35 west 39 east, 40, 42, 43 42 8,34,39,40,41,43,44 43 8,39,40,41,42,44 44 2, 8, 39, 42, 43 H. Plan Approval 1. The Master Developer shall retain the right ofindividual plan approval for all single farmly homes within the subdivision. XII. LANDSCAPING A. General Overall Landscape Charac ter 1. Open space areas shall balance naturalized and formally maintained elements to provide a low maintenance design that contributes to the rural character of the corridor. 2. Naturalized treatments thatinclude mass plantings ofperermial grasses in no -mow and low -mow areas shall transition to formally maintained areas near streets and intersections. Well defined edges shall be used to create transitional areas between formally maintained and naturalized landscape zones. 3. Entry features, retention/detention areas and other plantings shall blend to create a natural effect that is characteristic of the surrounding B. Hyland —Croy Road Landscape Treatment 1. Alandscape treatment shall be installed in the setback and open space area along Hyland -Croy Road. 2. Entry features may be located within this treatment and shall have formal character. Entry features may include fencing, masonry columns, signage, planting, lighting and irrigation. 3. Large open areas shall transition from preserved tree rows, to naturalized areas featuring no -mow or low -mow grasses, to formally maintained areas along streets and around entry features. 4. Storm water management facilities may be located in this treatment and may be in the form ofwet ponds, wetlands or dry basins. 5. Multi -use paths or sidewalks maybe located within this treatment. A multi -use path along the entire Hyland Croy Road frontage is not required to be constructed as part of this development. 6. Final design for this treatment shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. C. Mitchell —Dewitt Road landscape Treatment 1. Alandscape treatment shall be installed in the setback and open space area along Mitchell -Dewitt Road. 2. Entry features may be located within this treatment and shall have formal character. Entry features may include fencing, masonry columns, signage, planting, lighting and irrigation. 3. A landscape screen shall be provided to create a buffer between the lots and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. This treatment may include evergreen and deciduous trees, ornamental trees and evergreen and deciduous shrubs. 4. Final design for this treatment shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 5. Multi -use paths or sidewalks maybe located within this treatment. A multi -use path along the Mitchell -Dewitt Road frontage is not required to be constructed as part of this development. D. Entry Features 1. Entry features shall include fencing, masonry columns, integrated project signage, landscaping, lighting and irrigation. 2. The design shall contribute to and maintain the rural character of the 3. Final location, design, and standards for entry features and related landscaping and signage details shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 4. All entry features will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Necessary easements or reserves for entry features shall beprovi ded on the final plat. Development Standards E. Storm Water Facilities 1. Storm water facilities shall be located in the open space areas. These facilities may be in the form of wet ponds, wetlands, and/or dry basins. 2. Final location, design, and standards for these facilities shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 3. A maintenance outline for all facilities shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. E. Street Trees 1. Street trees will be installed in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. Final location shall be determined by the City Fores ter. F. Fencing 1. Fencing shall be per code. G. Open Space /Lot Line Demarcation 1. A line of demarcation, as identified on the Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit PDP-6, shall be provided where lots abut open space areas to prevent encroachment ofho ncowner maintenance onto public open space areas. 2. The line of demarcation may be a low, split rail fence, wood posts at property comers, landscaping or any other means to define the private property from public property. Final design and details of this element shall be approved as part of the final development plan. H. Private Sidewalks 1. A minimum three (3) foot wide sidewalk shall be required for every esidence. This private sidewalk shall extend from the front door to the driveway, where applicable, as the driveway may abut the front door in auto -court situations. I. Auto Court Pavement (Lots 1 -7) 1. Auto court areas created by court loaded garages shall utilize an upgraded pavement material. 2. Upgraded pavement material types (not standard concrete or asphalt) shall include, but not be limited to bri ck, interlocking concrete pavers, stamped concrete and/or architectural concrete. DS -4 CELTIC — CROSSING 31 19 north, 20, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35 32 19,20, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35 33 19,31,32,34,35,40,41 34 32,33, 35, 39 north, 40, 41, 42 35west 18,19,32,33,34,36 35 north 19, 20, 32, 33, 34, 39 north, 40 36 west 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 east, 35 west, 37 36 south 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 35 west, 37, 38 south 37 12,13,14,15,36,38, 38 cast 8 west 9, 10, 11, 12, 37, 39 east 38 south 10,11,12,13, 36 south, 37, 39 east 39 cast 8,9,38,42,43,44 39 north 8, 35 north, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 40 8,19,34,35,39,41,42 41 33,34,35 west, 39 east, 40, 42, 43 42 8,34,39,40,41,43,44 43 8,39,40,41,42,44 44 2, 8, 39, 42, 43 H. Plan Approval 1. The Master Developer shall retain the right ofindividual plan approval for all single farmly homes within the subdivision. XII. LANDSCAPING A. General Overall Landscape Character 1. Open space areas shall balance naturalized and formally maintained elements to provide a low maintenance design that contributes to the rural character of the corridor. 2. Naturalized treatments thatinclude mass plantings ofperermial grasses in no -mow and low -mow areas shall transition to formally maintained areas near streets and intersections. Well defined edges shall be used to create transitional areas between formally maintained and naturalized landscape zones. 3. Entry features, retention/detention areas and other plantings shall blend to create a natural effect that is characteristic of the surrounding B. Hyland —Croy Road Landscape Treatment 1. Alandscape treatment shall be installed in the setback and open space area along Hyland -Croy Road. 2. Entry features may be located within this treatment and shall have formal character. Entry features may include fencing, masonry columns, signage, planting, lighting and irrigation. 3. Large open areas shall transition from preserved tree rows, to naturalized areas featuring no -mow or low -mow grasses, to formally maintained areas along streets and around entry features. 4. Storm water management facilities may be located in this treatment and may be in the form ofwet ponds, wetlands or dry basins. 5. Multi -use paths or sidewalks maybe located within this treatment. A multi -use path along the entire Hyland Croy Road frontage is not required to be constructed as part of this development. 6. Final design for this treatment shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. C. Mitchell —Dewitt Road landscape Treatment 1. Alandscape treatment shall be installed in the setback and open space area along Mitchell -Dewitt Road. 2. Entry features may be located within this treatment and shall have formal character. Entry features may include fencing, masonry columns, signage, planting, lighting and irrigation. 3. A landscape screen shall be provided to create a buffer between the lots and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. This treatment may include evergreen and deciduous trees, ornamental trees and evergreen and deciduous shrubs. 4. Final design for this treatment shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 5. Multi -use paths or sidewalks maybe located within this treatment. A multi -use path along the Mitchell -Dewitt Road frontage is not required to be constructed as part of this development. D. Entry Features 1. Entry features shall include fencing, masonry columns, integrated project signage, landscaping, lighting and irrigation. 2. The design shall contribute to and maintain the rural character of the 3. Final location, design, and standards for entry features and related landscaping and signage details shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 4. All entry features will be owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Necessary easements or reserves for entry features shall beprovi ded on the final plat. Development Standards E. Storm Water Facilities 1. Storm water facilities shall be located in the open space areas. These facilities may be in the form of wet ponds, wetlands, and/or dry basins. 2. Final location, design, and standards for these facilities shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 3. A maintenance outline for all facilities shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. E. Street Trees 1. Street trees will be installed in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. Final location shall be determined by the City Fores ter. F. Fencing 1. Fencing shall be per code. G. Open Space /Lot Line Demarcation 1. A line of demarcation, as identified on the Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit PDP-6, shall be provided where lots abut open space areas to prevent encroachment ofhomeowner maintenance onto public open space areas. 2. The line of demarcation may be a low, split rail fence, wood posts at property comers, landscaping or any other means to define the private property from public property. Final design and details of this element shall be approved as part of the final development plan. H. Private Sidewalks 1. A minimum three (3) foot wide sidewalk shall be required for every residence. This private sidewalk shall extend from the front door to the driveway, where applicable, as the driveway may abut the front door in auto -court situations. I. Auto Court Pavement (Lots 1 -7) 1. Auto court areas created by court loaded garages shall utilize an upgraded pavement material. 2. Upgraded pavement material types (not standard concrete or asphalt) shall include, but not be limited to bri ck, interlocking concrete pavers, stamped concrete and/or architectural concrete. DS -4 CELTIC — CROSSING J. Cul-drSac Islands 1. Cul -de -sac islands shall be landscapedwith lawn and /orplant material. Any lawn and/or plant material located within an island shall be maintained by the HOA. Xlll. HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION All residential property owners locatedwithin the Celtic Crossing PUD shall be required to join and maintain membership in a forced and funded homeowners association, which will be formed pri or to any lots being sold. Homeowners association responsibilities shall be detailed within Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions as approved by the City of Dublin before being duly recorded in the office of the Union County Recorder. These Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions shall run with the land and shall include, without limitation, the requirements imposed upon the homeowners association in this text. Development Standards DS -5 CELTIC— CROSSING J. Cul -dr5ac Islands 1. Cul -de -sac islands shall be landscapedwith lawn and /orplant material. Any lawn and/or plant material located within an island shall be maintained by the HOA. XIII. HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION All residential property owners locatedwithin the Celtic Crossing PUD shall be required to join and maintain membership in a forced and funded homeowners association, which will be formed pri or to any lots being sold. Homeowners association responsibilities shall be detailed within Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions as approved by the City of Dublin before being duly recorded in the office of the Union County Recorder. These Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions shall run with the land and shall include, without limitation, the requirements imposed upon the homeowners association in this text. Development Standards DS -5 SECTION III- Exhibits SECTION III- Exhibits R MF PMK f Q O I � 1 TMIMW6f�'�, weomsiW 1� ' 1• x r ,� `. y vV,,J* o �tt U ol X „r �0 fi AMWE MElXOP1EC RMEM � WIFNIB ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ' ❑ O ❑�❑ E ❑O❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ...'+ Q Oc ❑ ❑ ❑❑ 1 t l7 f c= 7 l V GLIRIIPoWF XWX XXpOL 6 NFMMMF r {U 17§” Alf.. ���EEEEIIII�pF ipb99+ °i fiFFF .. Lul p G J, �O CMIP r 3 PE � � V IEEEEEE� — PDP X Im m .X 1 R fi M KMMK a E1110PMI[ Q ' O TYRA.m weomsiax u P �1 fiFAOEA . MEIROPItlL RMEM fi01FUYB ❑❑ 0 13 ❑ O 13 n ❑ ❑ +� .. ❑ ❑O❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ` O�C ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 1 {,. l7 f j C = O V ouE 1F i GLIRI XWX XXpOL 6 m NFMMMI! 0 i V csWcse'�pp fiFFF LU aa � gg ilJl sd: c s �O MFP °e eomsi f i i V PDP u .a .v .v 1 i •� C . • t l f ( BFNDENDAL ' OPEN SPACE �' Low DBUSm k t � � - " d ; -• . PMI6l n. •' .. aormrmsnr m ®oiow 2 z to N WNI SPACE UB Of U AeNCU L.rvNAL o � $ y AY.ftKdILrvEAl p wslmmor Oi lAv CL 1 r onE IDF yy f DEN M. 1 S � 4 A F" y IrnvDUSm . - r x ri z' I ww DExsnv -, E o f LU 1 y ,, PI BESIDENML � BENDENIML - t Low DENST' r • �'ry Y' Lu! f PMNL LOW SITY DEN r t r - OPEN SPACF r I - f� BENDENDAL .. LOW D f�.'. n . a r MIXFO NisIDFNFIAL NICKED •POD• NBDC NES�ENML NSTM OWU B �' _ j• _ Y LOW DENS" CMC {� � f .a. PAP � ame mnrtoy /mmbn zszs.'W.w,f�d'mmf✓P ve mw aargMd x voe t ye rw,uv eceel by IXn1d3aPVSe e<2 o_N eaxevaee�n� .552 tmi � ewm eaNm'x n a veormovw w50 gi mme oe of HPom w�apme(wn t) one mmmd�xmrcl �e ( W A' eoa VYwe aoM�fo W ,rr eeeefmva�e ans mro �t ° we e n ne, �re Wr .—Y m, of d urP,n ua a- c mz5� n 15 um< � root ma �d�,. � nxas�zueoo„ mW aaN cr �W. � J2Z P . - b, I m, 05A"im Pv = ✓¢eo m an omrermo i ciez arz not r9 ea c -- —1 1, em w mt+.e m en¢,m r� 3PS a ae, trt o n° xib e �MO d wemem r z wo ° eo. zzzs a � o / <" 292 t w mrre ym%rc e «cam e sew br 2� 11 �a m ¢fmfd e.>da a wst v orxam xer. 7 i i,,I m u111, r, 2 iw 112szs pw aoIXU>,.m a: n % fa one beme m m. aaes;M. �t�eMlmrc o � s.b fen. o- Mao mm n men°e oIl11 en ;wr �;� f � �e e�e�P,;MSfn,dR b vvt M m m nw Pm'xt mmvmbv vI mm mymd23f wv m NMS�Po' dJ' 66" Ewt b NaWm of 92. ai /xt ng v %e /e 1 bPn Lo<t rM 0.525 a we 4en � an¢ Rcerve Aaq Pm/e 19Q v MA,_n M i1e u,b/YnMf- 1 uvy IMe of evn frymb cny wvW - �enf Q al�en to dvevmnr,m�a w � mrm ax'.ieirolld a..'e roam azm o.. m 21�1�Ia'.1 �\ R 111. Wit; n11 -1-1 -9 1 N--d ', ,I ,_ s ne=a, a,bm, „I aa�ye�P ~em 1 „at -ea. � w�ivpo p vn Wd�„ oa.mm.p iu -••• o- rvt�au4 '�'f� /p.ec pIP� xn�� v 1 • �il �y U 2 �pp o� N urcm�duc b u� U xrou�, 1 F azm o.. 17 24 m 2Ym- avCydbn —, r fwt �e yMI CI WX b1� dd of resod m ofscd assb siS rtge a C:.—by dd of —n -- 0. � --, vge mm s5 nv1 , ve eO1 fzeel mct 4 w w f m�(r /z by e°e of— M ory fai race 102 d.e A yY llw l(14 ere,el by wd of rwse m oeec ease vai pye .53z, b �y ofmd mwe ud rop xs enKf by base of M wdnq�v s/e �� rma b � ¢m � Nmn ve oaov v �'w Poe � vM1� 1h. 1-1 swe �e t [ns*mrG am al✓fWm fib'R t N dab m �Mw` wvnpvr crydwu nzs� R.m 6 Y u oryac oxa 0 N 2 7 m Fal I PDP I m 21�1�Ia'.1 �\ R 111. Wit; n11 -1-1 -9 1 N--d ', ,I ,_ s ne=a, a,bm, „I aa�ye�P ~em 1 „at -ea. 17 24 m 2Ym- avCydbn —, r fwt �e yMI CI WX b1� dd of resod m ofscd assb siS rtge a C:.—by dd of —n -- 0. � --, vge mm s5 nv1 , ve eO1 fzeel mct 4 w w f m�(r /z by e°e of— M ory fai race 102 d.e A yY llw l(14 ere,el by wd of rwse m oeec ease vai pye .53z, b �y ofmd mwe ud rop xs enKf by base of M wdnq�v s/e �� rma b � ¢m � Nmn ve oaov v �'w Poe � vM1� 1h. 1-1 swe �e t [ns*mrG am al✓fWm fib'R t N dab m �Mw` wvnpvr crydwu nzs� R.m 6 Y u oryac oxa 0 N 2 7 m Fal I PDP I 1 /ary=- Desk l moem PonL:nnn�YCrei. / Y OR. RPS. Po.rra 5 B cw�ene Poem CwnM1'. Alsl�cpalRmPh Damn I lB.1NAC O R. Kq Pp.959 t J, dry MOUMa IR. xo. Po.19B Im , arcor a� c.marngbL Un s,.yA�. / 0 .R.145Po114 f.CXk E.mrytl.L Tv CL 4 1 ' .' � � A '•� — \� _� � Po i — �(�j� \ r � 0 � � �/ � .RM1. 2 P=W1 c nosk /2 0. 1 196 �aplmp O.R 194. Po.]9 p� Anm ROWa O.R.95. PoNd W "'+. / ' i.wRalme� NaY�R�NR10 @ \\ I .wnerRwnaR. RnRIM.uax / - -� Xw JOM EM-aW LMnp ThUr // / 6NN/e. / // Iah�R. Iy1eb � I LU� C O. 1L�k OA %4Pp.185 / � Y AYryAL51e I I/ / OA.I%.PY.165 / 2IU ♦c.lanprvp I3 I / sunk IOL31aa9 I a / //� �� "'� i PDP ✓ 4 ��Qj'�yj 000E 000 0000 ©mom 000E 000p 0000 0000 0000 0000 ®000 0000 0000 0000 0000 000® pppp ©000 ©00© 000© 0000 oomo 0000 0000 0000 ppp0 pomm 0000 ©omm 0000 D ©�� �m ©m mm ©o �mmm mmmm mm ©m 0000 0 ©�0 ®000 mom© 000 0000 000 0000 ®0�0 0000 a0o® oo ©0 000® ®omo 0000 0000 000 000 ®omo ©000 0000 oomo 0o ®v ®omo© ©o ®© 0000 000 000 ®omo oomo 0000 v ®moo 000 ®0 ®0 000 0000 000 0000 ® ©mo 00 ®0 0000 000 0000 ®o ®o oo ®© 0000 000 0000 000 0000 000 0000 ®omo mono moo© 00�© oomo Dom® 0000 000 _ - - 0000 000 0000 0000 oomo 0000 000 0 ®�0 o0m© 000® 0000 00 ©0 000 000 oomo ®000 oomo 0000 000 0000 0 ©00 000 0000 000 00 ®0 0000 oomo 00 ©0 00�© 00 ®© 0000 000 oomo oom© 00�© 0000 0000 000 000 0000 0000 00�® ®omo 0000 00 ®© 0000 oomo 000 oomo oomo 000 oomo 00�© 00 ©0 000® oomo vv ©o 000 oomo 000© 0000 000 ®000 oomo 0000 0000 oomo 0000 0000 000© 000® oom® 000 00�© 000© vv ©o oo�� 000 oomo 0000 0000 vv ©o 0000 00 ®© 000© 0000 oomo 000 oomo �amo 0000 000 ®000 ®omo ®000 oo�0 000 ®000 ©0�© ®00® 0000 0�mo ®omo ©omo© �0 ®v v ©o0 000 ®000 oom© ®000 ©000 000 ®000 ©omo ®oo© 0000 00�® X00® 000© �0 ®© 0000 000 ®0�0 ©omo X000 000 000 ®0�0 000 ®000 000 000 00�® 000 �0 ®0 oomo 0000 ®o�0 0000 000 0000 0000 000 0000 00�© 0000 ®0�0 000 00�© 0000 0000 ®0�0 0000 000 0000 oomo ®o�0 oom© 0000 0000 oomo 0000 000 0000 0000 oomo ®0�0 0000 0000 000 oomo 0000 000 oom© 000 oomo 000 00�o mom© 0000 0000 000 000 oom© 0000 000 000 000 oomo 000 oom© ®omo ®omo 0000 0000 " � 0000 000 oomo 000 0000 000 oomo ®omo 0000 000 oom© 00�© 0000 000® 000© oomo 000 oomo 0000 ®0�0 000 0000 0000 ®omo oom© 000 0ao® 00�® oo�� 000 oomo oom© 000 000© ®000 000© ®oom 000 oomo 000 oomo 000® oomo oomo 000© 000 ®omo 0000 �0mo 0000 000 0 ©�0 0000 000 0000 ao�o 00 0 00 0 0000 0000 000 000 000 00�© 000 oomo oomo 0000 00�© ©00=3�0 oo�0 0000 00�® o0m© 0000 00 ©0 0000 0000 oomo 0000 � g �3IIv�v�vGoiieG i�SiFe�vGYv �'� � u �► N ® p T ��,�, 0 '�� � Rio► imp � ��i +vi _ � s; �+i Col N o� o�$ u 0 0 Z ag =F 6 3 6 vs Z N Z �g no LANDSCAPE KEY QA STREETTREES v av m �m xoinx QB UUNGTREEROW © POMNTIALMETROPARKTRAILCONNECTION Qo POND WITH AERATOR Q NATURALUED AREA I LOWWOW GRASS QF LAWN AREA © BUFFER PLANTING 0 ENTRY FEATURE Q PROPERTY DEUNEARON ELEMENT Q OFFSRESWALE a �i Lul PDP 6 CITY OF DUBLIN, UNION COUNTY, OHIO PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CELTIC CROSSING 2013 ) Ii 0.0.1 / M - IJY bn IOPn Spse) R@.CdONAI. COMB %i MAP f m /meni Um xeh .... W. U. NM lury Rsge PlennP, peb 18 m m O I �V 1/3 f4 DEVALO� DATA Y0.YLY/N Or61 -1 wmr^upm{ IDxlxc ....... . .... -. x-m:nl Mn ape eer. ;...._ Rg0.' SFD: .... _ ......... _ .......... _ ......... _P -RUnI OIp T . uea_ .awes ales mcxr a... ......... _ ......... _ ......... _ ......... _ .... t ue rues T xa£x e, �. .« . m. p.p e:exuwea. oDDnr: a ...... .._........._........._.......r in oWam m Nm xm...... .._........._........._.......: is oWwAm aPw avc3Owvnmmx rPOwa: mamv: ) Ii 0.0.1 / M - IJY bn IOPn Spse) R@.CdONAI. COMB %i MAP f m /meni Um xeh .... W. U. NM lury Rsge PlennP, peb 18 m m O I �V 1/3 rNM p1W / \ 1 11 11 �I oN w - roux . Pe. 1 r .effi mar , �ar — ^ "n�r "~ 's 2 k - 1 11' 1111 41 s mar a zr* — 9..� s 42 1 44 q 43 $ 5 s 31 I 29 g 30 19 I I �xar rar war eom �. Cµ096P iGOAl VE I I 23 5Y 1I 11 / rm. I ss rom I� s 35 40 39 I y a m . v+ 19 $ I a I a l a l a 2 7 . _ I ,1,11 � I I ...'� ag., a 1w a la 1s a — r —'�,•_ ..� — ��� a s, III & s I 21 I a II a war I V k 3e a al wm , '� I I I q I 36 k 37 •' m.+ 10 N I 1 p wffi mxgix rpnn +. g I g [ $ w .nwmn °- I I r eM+, a It 22 la S I 16 23 I e $ // / 12 �' \ 15 s 14 $ 13 $ I w.rtt•at�u.\ \ e ®n . a . r....• xx.r wax \: •� r' iy 9 „•, i xuat•taw te�_ `..� arn,�v w Po . re � � 1 �$ 11 \\ \� 11f x✓m / "A" 1 1 FM•.e / I I— 44 • �/ I / rr,env! rlat I w l RESA AC o il / / rn •e.10 I v®veaxgsu 5.60 21 w Standard Ladder Truck uw / x re. ..a t.a A[IT0.TURN6 U X2 /3 I .VPo:a - - T III M . w Q nWE Q 33 34 � p� I x u MUD rt mz 1 �I ( + '. --- 42 4 \ ~ O !, �.,,. ` S III a 2 I .w pi I A 30 32 4 ME _ na. $ ME g acs � � rzce ece SI A y" I I II I c x 4cb wea ans I 'I ate.0 1 xuWill �Po,^ � Asq". �° /: � 1 � ��" I i 28 a 27_,, - 1 / / /1811 II'\ 8\ m` j x ua -• e Y �� n � K // // »: �• i 1 ara ° lY/ 19 y 35 \ 40 39 B 3 i ME ME o eCa�o roe. ME ? Ms was Buw s ora ' 11 I"'S 1 — 1 p 16 ,r , L — . i3'am '� — •'""'� r e a ece d� i Vrcr mow.® rt /I• �', �,. �I �1 1 acr — ;>i. wxe I"w": / � 21 �• T tm� 1 a� ff by iy / \:. 3 $ j '^ II'I I '� // �� I I °• ° IA I b 3 M U M. 8 ...� 36 338 / ac g v � a 1 1 I. • 4�_... o.._..�,..,.. $ m / 17 wvs wav "as 1� a,! 0 i / /,. 1111• wts wx a22G6 raxcep.t El l / �`\ 0 �_ an� « -- Q � ;e i � _ �•�� s � • �' �,. ; ; , / / / mil 6 4„ ; I g I �r III 11 eGE i � �" - '- -�. It ays� S �. ' e e a ✓ �, �.� • 6 all ecr 23 v 4 is 7 11 �� 6 , , ��. a a f ;yc acr acr -,. rce/ w4 gyyyplR1R un or 8 ap 1 1 I I ea xa�sxi iw ..•� xa \ � � ` � � g _ !„ �_ \ - w / i a^� /'� � '•,� / � / / / / ,.' /�f °s.x _ I 1 � lY Its xszst•v+x tenet \,� o aerti•, wa'a0•t010 sat.tz' at Wiz• �pl�[ ^ y I �5 ©fill rll tams Elal I ll 'xv9 Mll Ul UUU i \°eft I / i / .w� Il 31; I I I IIII s CBAPHIC BCALE on o Pon a a , li f. a III miun Bix Po. ztO F— ��� I I I X3/3 Office of the City Manager Zityof Dublin Pho 614-410 • Fax:b614 -0410 -4490 1090 Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager �- Date: March 7, 2013 Initiated By: Steve Langworthy, Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning approximately 28.1 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,030 feet north of the intersection with Brand Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to establish a 44 lot single - family detached residential development and 8.75 acres of open space. (Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP) (Celtic Crossing PUD) Summary Ordinance 22 -13 is a request for review and approval of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan from R, Rural District to Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing PUD), and a Preliminary Plat for 28.1 acres to establish a 44 lot single- family detached residential development with 8.75 acres of open space. Background The site was annexed into the City of Dublin by City Council on June 15, 2009. Following the annexation, a petition for boundary adjustment was made to the Union County Commissioners and the petition was approved by the Commissioners on February 16, 2010. As a result, the site is now in Washington Township and is under the jurisdiction of Washington Township for the purpose of consistent provision of fire and public safety services in the City of Dublin. Description Preliminary Plat The proposed Preliminary Plat subdivides 28.11 acres of land into 44 single - family lots and 8.75 acres of open space. The plat also provides rights -of -way for Celtic Crossing Drive, Macha Court and Nemain Loop. The Preliminary Plat correctly shows all setback requirements and all information required by the Subdivision Regulations. The Zoning Code requires the dedication of 1.88 acres of open space and the proposal contains 8.75 acres within six platted reserves. The plat indicates that the open space areas will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a forced /funded homeowners association. Memo re. Ordinance 22-13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 2 of 7 Preliminary Development Plan The proposed plan includes 44 lots along three new public streets. The plan shows a new intersection and turn lane with Hyland -Croy Road at the east edge of the site. A new public street, Celtic Crossing Drive, will serve 27 lots, extending west through the site, crossing a stream and curving to a new intersection with Mitchell -Dewitt Road at the southwest corner of the site. A single- loaded cul -de -sac street, Macha Court, will extend south of Celtic Crossing Drive in the east portion of the site, providing frontage for five lots facing Hyland -Croy Road. A loop street, Nemain Loop, will run through the center of the site, extending south from two intersections with Celtic Crossing Drive and serves 17 lots. The proposal includes 8.75 acres of open space, including scenic setbacks along Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road as provided in the Community Plan, a Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ), and a stormwater management area along the south edge of the site. Seven lots will be east of the stream, facing Hyland -Croy Road. Seventeen lots are proposed along the north and west property lines, backing up to the Glacier Ridge Metro Park. A multi -use path connection will provide access to the Metro Park immediately north of the site and to Dublin Jerome High School with a marked pedestrian crossing at the new Hyland -Croy intersection. Development Text Use /Density /Lot sizes The development text permits single - family detached homes, open spaces and related park features. The development is limited to a maximum of 44 lots, for a gross density of 1.57 units per acre. The text requires a minimum lot area of 12,600 square feet. Required lot width at the building line is 90 feet and required minimum lot depth is 140 feet. Setbacks The Community Plan recommends 100 to 200 -foot scenic setbacks along rural roadways, including Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. The development text requires a minimum 200 -foot building and pavement setback from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right - of -way, consistent with setbacks for other residential developments along Hyland -Croy Road. Individual lot setbacks stipulate a minimum 20 -foot front yard and 25 -foot rear yard. Required side yard setbacks are a minimum of six feet on one side, with a total of 14 feet. The text allows a variable building and pavement setback along Mitchell -Dewitt Road, ranging from approximately 200 feet at its widest point to a minimum of 50 feet near the westernmost edge of the site. A portion of this 50 -foot minimum setback area extends across the rear corner of one single - family lot. The Planning and Zoning Commission required additional landscape buffer plantings in this location. Tralfc and Access This site and a portion of the Hyland -Croy Road right -of -way was annexed into the City of Dublin in 2009. The Union County Engineer maintains jurisdiction over Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Additional right -of -way dedications along both roadways are consistent with the City of Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. A roundabout is planned at the Hyland -Croy Road intersection with Brand Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road in 2013. Right -of -way has been acquired for this improvement to the south of the site; construction will not physically affect the site. This roundabout will provide improved traffic flow to the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt site access. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Memo re. Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 3 of 7 has been reviewed by both City of Dublin Engineering Staff and the Union County Engineer's Office. The TIS recommends that a left turn lane be installed on Hyland -Croy Road; no additional turn lanes are warranted on Mitchell- Dewitt Road. The Washington Township Fire Department has confirmed that both the Mitchell -Dewitt Road and Hyland -Croy Road access points are necessary for fire service. At the Planning and Zoning Commission's request, the applicant verified adequate sight distance to the existing Metro Park multi -use path crossing at Mitchell -Dewitt Road, located approximately 270 feet to the west of the proposed intersection. The applicant will be required to remove some existing trees and underbrush within the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt right -of -way and along the west site boundary to ensure adequate sight distance is provided. Planning also received some questions regarding the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt access point from existing residents on Mitchell -Dewitt Road; related correspondence is attached to this memo. Sidewalks and Multi -Use Paths A four -foot public sidewalk is required along all new street frontages, except that an eight -foot multi -use path may be substituted as indicated on the proposed plans. The development text also requires a three -foot private sidewalk from the front door to the driveway for every residence, except where courtyard -style garages are used. A multi -use path will be installed along a portion of Celtic Crossing Drive. The applicant will also construct a continuous multi -use path connection within the Metro Park along the north site boundary connecting to the existing Metro Park path system west of the site. The applicant will be required to design and construct a pedestrian crossing facility with a marked crosswalk and pedestrian- activated warning signal at the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and Celtic Crossing Drive, similar to that at the Hyland -Croy Road/Tullymore Drive intersection. This crossing will provide access to the existing multi -use path along the east side of Hyland -Croy Road and will connect the site to Dublin Jerome High School. At the Concept Plan review, the Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the possibility of providing additional path connections along Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road as part of this development. Commission members generally agreed that a path along Hyland -Croy Road is less critical at this time because (1) the timeline for future roadway improvements that would extend this path to the south is unknown; and (2) the applicant has included a pedestrian connection to the existing multi -use path on the east side of the road as an alternative. The proposed development text allows for paths to be located within the Hyland - Croy Road open space setback, but does not require them to be constructed along the roadway. Commission members generally agreed that a path should be installed along Mitchell -Dewitt Road as a connection to the Metro Park path west of the site. However, during the Preliminary Development Plan process, the applicant was informed by the Metropolitan Park District that it would permit only a single path connection from the development to the Metro Park path system. For this reason, the development text does not require a path connection along Mitchell -Dewitt Road. This connection is illustrated on the proposed landscape plan, but is currently omitted from the Preliminary Plat. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the applicant continue to work with the Metro Parks District to obtain approval of Memo re. Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 4 of 7 the second path connection. The applicant has recently obtained this approval; related correspondence from the Parks District is attached to this memo. Architecture The development text describes the general character of the development as one, one and a half, and two -story homes with a variety of two and three -car garages. The text requires adherence to the Residential Appearance Standards of the Dublin Zoning Code unless otherwise stated. The text includes additional design requirements for lots with high visibility from Hyland - Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Materials: Permitted exterior cladding materials include brick, thin brick, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered wood, fiber- cement siding, stucco or any combination of these materials. Stucco is not permitted on lots visible from Hyland -Croy Road or Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Permitted trim materials include wood, engineered wood, vinyl, aluminum, EIFS, copper or fiber- cement products. Roofing materials include asphalt, wood, slate, concrete, tile or metal. Cladding materials are required to be of a natural earth tone and /or warm neutral color. Diversity: The development text includes a lot diversity matrix prohibiting the same or similar front elevations on nearby lots. As a condition of approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant has revised the lot diversity matrix to address technical errors and inconsistencies as part of this submittal. The revised text includes language to clarify how the diversity matrix is to be applied. In the event that the matrix is affected by site plan adjustments during the Final Development Plan /Final Plat stage, the applicant will be required to provide an updated matrix. Garages: All homes are required to have either an attached or detached garage, sized to accommodate at least two standard automobiles side by side. Front -load, side -load and auto - court style garage configurations are permitted, with some location - specific limitations. Standard front - loaded garages are prohibited for lots with high visibility from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road; garage doors must face away from these roadways. Courtyard driveways with visibility from Hyland -Croy Road must be constructed with a decorative pavement material or upgraded finish. Throughout the development, all garage doors must have a decorative and upgraded design, such as "carriage- style" doors. For auto -court configurations, a low wall or hedge is required along the front edge of the courtyard pavement facing the street. For side - loaded garages, a hedge is required along the rear edge of the driveway pavement to prevent headlight passage into adjacent properties. The development text also allows front - loaded garages to extend no more than six feet forward of the front fagade of the house or porch; no more than 40% of all lots are permitted to have a front - loaded garage extending any distance from the front faSade of the house. Tree Preservation and Replacement A 15 -foot tree preservation zone is proposed at the rear of the 17 lots bordering the Metro Park. The development text prohibits trees from being removed from this zone, except where necessary for the installation or maintenance of utilities as approved in the final development plan. Removal of dead, diseased or noxious trees and other vegetation is also permitted. As a Memo re. Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 5 of 7 condition of approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the text has been revised to allow unvegetated portions of the tree preservation zone to be maintained as lawn. The proposed development text outlines a goal to preserve as many trees in good or fair condition as possible. The text includes tree replacement plan requirements, which vary from the standard Code requirements for tree replacement. A detailed tree replacement plan will be required with the final development plan. Tree Waivers: The Zoning Code requires that all protected trees (trees six inches in diameter or greater and in good or fair condition) be replaced on an inch for inch' basis with deciduous trees. The applicant is proposing a waiver to this requirement in the development text: Trees between six and 24 caliper inches may be replaced tree for tree,' rather than `inch for inch.' Trees of 24 caliper inches or greater must be replaced 'inch for inch: The applicant has provided a tree survey that preliminarily identifies 304 inches for removal, with 222 inches in good or fair condition. Twenty -two protected trees have been identified for removal in the location of the proposed Celtic Crossing Drive stream crossing. Four additional protected trees must be removed at the southwest corner of the site to meet intersection sight distance requirements. The proposed landscape plan indicates that replacement trees will be located throughout the open space reserves. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the proposed tree replacement waiver, and suggested that the number of street trees that will be planted with this development should be taken into consideration in addition to the replacement trees within open space areas. Open Space and Landscaping The subdivision regulations require the dedication of 1.88 acres of land, based on the total site area and proposed number of lots. The plan includes 8.75 acres of proposed open space (31 of the total site area), consisting of scenic roadway setbacks, the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, and stormwater management areas. The development text states that these open spaces will be owned by the City. The applicant will be responsible for the initial landscaping of the open space areas and the homeowners association will be responsible for maintenance. The proposed text describes the general intent for landscape character within the development, consistent with the recommendations of the Community Plan, to balance naturalized and formally maintained landscape elements, using low- maintenance design that contributes to the rural character of the area. Specific landscape requirements and design guidelines are provided for both the Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road open space setbacks. The applicant has prepared an illustrative, conceptual landscape plan that shows the general design intent of the proposal and conformance with the development text. Details regarding the open space landscaping will be required with the final development plan. The development text requires a 'line of demarcation' along residential lot lines that abut open space areas, including the Stream Corridor Protection Zone and a stormwater management area along the south site boundary to prevent encroachment of homeowner maintenance onto the Memo re. Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 6 of 7 public open space areas. Planning will work with the applicant to determine an appropriate method to provide this line as part of the final development plan. Utilities and Stormwater Management The site will connect to the public water and sanitary sewer systems with new water and sewer mains extending to the existing utility lines along the east side of Hyland -Croy Road. Adequate capacity exists in these systems to serve this development. There are two separate stormwater management systems, consisting of a wet retention pond within the Hyland -Croy open space setback and two wet retention basins connected by a shallow swale along the south site boundary. Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ) The property includes a Stream Corridor Protection Zone bisecting the site, along a tributary to the North Fork of the Indian Run. This zone is intended to preserve the flood water capacity of the existing drainage way and limit stream erosion through the preservation of existing vegetation. The floodplain analysis conducted by the applicant indicates that the necessary width of the zone is 50 feet on each side of the high water mark for the existing channel. Celtic Crossing Drive crosses the protection zone in the north portion of the site with a stream culvert and a co- located utility easement. The proposal shows small portions of the protection zone overlapping the rear yards of seven lots and the side yard of one lot. The proposed Preliminary Plat identifies these overlapping areas as a defined "On -lot Stream Corridor Protection Zone" with specific requirements and limitations outlined in the development text. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission first reviewed this application as a Concept Plan at the January 3, 2013 meeting and recommended approval of the Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat to City Council on February 7, 2013 with the conditions listed below. Conditions 2, 6 and 7 of the Preliminary Development Plan and the single condition of the Preliminary Plat have been addressed. The applicant has also provided a revised conceptual landscape plan to reflect the requirements of Conditions 1 and 4 of the Preliminary Development Plan. These and all other conditions will be monitored and /or addressed at the Final Development Plan /Final Plat stage. Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Conditions 1) That additional landscape buffering be provided on the portion of Lot 24 within the Mitchell - Dewitt scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location; 2) That the development text be revised so as not to prohibit homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within the tree preservation zone; 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan; Memo re. Ordinance 22 -13 - Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Celtic Crossing PUD March 7, 2012 Page 7 of 7 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sight Distance exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell -Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and 8) That the applicant provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater swale improvements prior to approval of the final development plan. Preliminary Plat Condition 1) That the preliminary plat be revised to identify the Macha Court cul -de -sac island and the Celtic Crossing Drive eyebrow' loop island as platted reserves prior to submission for City Council review. Recommendation Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 22 -13 at the second reading /public hearing on April 8, 2013. RECORD OF ORDINANCES 22-13 r. „e AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 28.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HYLAND -CROY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,030 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH BRAND ROAD AND MITCHELL - DEWITT ROAD, R, RURAL DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (CELTIC CROSSING PUD) TO ESTABLISH A 44 -LOT SINGLE- FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND8.75 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE (CASE 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, of its elected members concurring, that: Se ction 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description marked Exhibit "A'J, situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Cade and amendments thereto. Section . The application (Exhibit "B "), including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission (Exhibit "C'J, are all Incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance therewith. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. Passed this day of 2013. Mayor - Presiding Officer Ey ill Clerk of Councl Metro Parks Metro Parks 1069 West Main St Westerville OH 43081 Tel: 614.891.0700 TTY: 614.895.6240 Fax: 614.895.6208 www.metroparks.net Park Commissioners: Greg S. Lashutka Jim McGregor J. Jeffrey McNealey Director: John R. O'Meara Your Metro Parks: Battelle Darby Creek Blacklick Woods and Golf Courses Blendon Woods Chestnut Ridge Clear Creek Glacier Ridge Heritage Park and Trail Highbanks Inniswood Metro Gardens Pickerington Ponds Prairie Oaks Rocky Fork Scioto Audubon Sharon Woods Slate Run Farm and Park Three Creeks Walnut Woods February 28, 2013 Kevin McCauley Stavroff Interests 565 Metro Place South, #480 Dublin, Ohio 43017 RE: Celtic Crossing Development Trail Connections to Glacier Ridge Metro Park Dear Mr. McCauley: This letter is to serve as a permit to allow Stavroff Interests LTD /Celtic Crossing Development, it agents, to construct a public access multi -use trail on Metro Park property in Union County, Ohio. This improvement shall be constructed and operaterated as per Metro Parks Trail Connection policy. This permit is to allow for two trail connetions to the Ironweed Trail in Glacier Ridge Metro Park as described more particularly on Exhibit A, attached hereto. The trail improvement shall be kept to a minimun and include grading, drainage, paving, restoration and seeding of all disturbed areas on park property. Please contact Steve Studenmund, Metro Parks Planning Manager (614- 895 -6231) to coordinate design and construction of improvements. A fee of $6.30 per linear foot of trail, shall be paid to Metro Parks prior to opening any trail segment to the public. This fee is to be used by Metro Parks for related signage, operations and maintence based on a three year period. Sincerely, John O'Meara Executive Director cc: Mike Heisey, Glacier Ridge Metro Park XV3d ONIGVMD (INV A.UltLrt - � ot .txrrvra is �� ; � , � �� ••�: , \ . \ ,,_.,'ten- \ {,• I ---------- --- --------- A w ---- -- ------------- C04 A RM - uw - NN IWO 1 EU 4 Ism rf 1 44 ---- --- U-4 Rom I At 44 .11 40t ............ 1i Low O 4t 1, 1-0 ayissaaaai.i. \n wJVJlriu tllrfiYhl'fria : F 1 7 j i� M f •M. rl.lrf ql flr) Y P F }.�, r ,� : •` /', fat r, L ++1 n 9 N 4 O N RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 1 of Justin Goodwin - Re: Fw: Celtic Crossing Development From: Jeremy Nutting <JNutting @oh.hra.com> To: "Justin Goodwin" <JGoodwin @dublin.oh.us> Date: 2/8/2013 10:50 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Celtic Crossing Development CC: "Aaron Stanford" <AStanford @dublin.oh.us >, <kevin @stavroff.com> Hello Justin, Thank you for the update. I am happy to hear that some of these change are already included in the latest proposal. Jeremy Nutting Principal Engineer, VP3 Suspension and Steering Research Honda R &D Americas, Inc. Phone: 937 - 309 -9809 From "Justin Goodwin" <JGoodwin @dublin oh us> To: "Jeremy Nutting" <JNutting @oh.hra.com> Cc "Aaron Stanford" <AStanford @dublin.oh.us>, <kevin@stavroff.com> Date: 02107/2013 01:05 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Celtic Crossing Development Mr. Nutting, Thank you for providing an update on your communications with Mr. McCauley. I spoke with him this morning regarding your mailbox, and he indicated that he will take care of its relocation to a spot acceptable to the US Postal Service and the Union County Engineer. Our Engineering staff will assist in this process. Our staff agrees that the Mitchell- Dewitt multi -use path connection to the metro park system is very desirable. The applicant has shown this path connection on their conceptual site plan, but not on the preliminary plat, as they are still working with the metro park district to gain approval of a second path connection in addition to the proposed connection to the north of the site. We hope to see this connection included on the final development plan and final plat, which will be the next steps after the rezoning is approved by City Council. The applicant has committed to constructing this path, pending metro parks approval. With regard to the location of lot 24 (nearest Mitchell- Dewitt Road), this lot has been shifted away from the Mitchell -Dewitt right -of -way as compared to its location in the previous concept plan. However, you are correct that the proposed location remains closer to the roadway than recommended by the Dublin Community Plan's roadway character guidelines - this will be a discussion point at the Planning Commission meeting this evening. The applicant did eliminate one lot to the west of the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt access street, opening up the setback at this location from approximately 120 to 200 file://C: \Documents and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise \5114D87CDubli... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 2of4 feet. As currently proposed, the front portion of lot 24 is now located approximately 115 feet from the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt right -of -way line; the setback becomes more narrow toward the rear of the lot. In addition to the dense landscape buffer proposed along the edge of this lot, staff has recommended that additional landscaping be added to the portion of the lot nearest Mitchell -Dewitt to provide additional screening from the roadway. Note that the home itself is likely to be located approximately 70 to 80 feet from the new Mitchell -Dewitt right -of -way line. I hope you find this information helpful. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions or concerns. I will also provide a copy of this correspondence to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration at tonight's hearing. Sincerely, Justin Goodwin, AICP Planner II City of Dublin Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614 410.4600 direct 614 410.4677 jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us www.dublinohiousa. ov w_ww.twitter.com,{dublinohio www.facebook.com,(dublinohio >>> Jeremy Nutting <JNutting @oh.hra.com> 2/6/2013 7:54 PM >>> Hello Justin, We met several weeks ago at the Celtic Crossing hearing. I have lived at 7787 Mitchell Dewitt Road for almost 8 years and am located directly across from that proposed entrance. At the last Planning and Zoning meeting a few weeks ago, I made some comments regarding the Mitchell Dewitt side of the subdivision plan. Since then, Kevin from Stavroff Associates has been nice enough to meet with me to answer some additional questions I had, and to show me the next proposal that I believe is up for comments at Thursday's hearing. Kevin explained their next proposal, and while it is an improvement, there still remains some of the same concerns that were voiced by myself and the board members at the original hearing. I had planned to attend Thursday's meeting but unfortunately have an out of town business trip scheduled at the same time. My opinion is that maintaining the rural character of the Mitchell Dewitt side of the development is still critical, especially with the heavily used Glacier Ridge trail location adjacent to the subdivision. Kevin and I discussed the entrance road from Mitchell Dewitt, and I understand that it must be there for safety service access. While the access road is OK, the final house location still does not meet the minimum 100' zoning requirement to maintain the intended rural character of Mitchell Dewitt Road and of the bike path. I was also disappointed to see that there was still no bike path connector along Mitchell Dewitt Road. The current proposed connector, while nice, is a long away from the houses at that end of the subdivision. With the relatively short frontage along Mitchell Dewitt road, it is guaranteed that the lack of a path is going to force residents onto the roadway to access that portion of the path that connects to the Honda Wetlands area. With the flat, open area that already exists along the road, it seems that it would be very easy to provide this connection. file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise \5114D87CDubli... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 3of4 My final concern is minor, but I am still curious. My mailbox is located exactly where the access road intersects Mitchell Dewitt. My hope is that the developer would take responsibility replacing in a safe location upon the start of the road construction. When we bought our house in 2005, we knew that the land across the street would someday be developed, and are happy to see that a high quality proposal has been submitted. Kevin has been quick to respond to any questions have had and I appreciate being able to give input to the process. Best Regards, Jeremy Nutting Principal Engineer, VP3 Suspension and Steering Research Honda R &D Americas, Inc. Phone: 937 - 309 -9809 -- Forwarded by Jeremy Nutfing/HRA/ASC /HONDA on 02/06/2013 07:19 PM -- From: "Jeremy and Amy Nutting" <jnutOng o@columbus.rr.com> To. ynutting@oh.hra.com> Date: 02/06/2013 04:19 PM Subject: FW: Celtic Crossing Development - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Justin Goodwin [ mailto:JGoodwinc @ idublin.oh.usl Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 9:19 AM To: jnutting @columbus.rr.com Subject: Celtic Crossing Development Mr. Nutting, You requested additional information regarding the proposed Celtic Crossing development following last week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The full Planning Report and proposed plans can be found online at http: / /dublinohiousa. - ov /pzc /12 -082/ Please feel free to contact me via email or by phone if you have any questions about the proposal. My contact information is provided below. Sincerely, Tustin Goodwin, AICP Planner II City of Dublin Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614 410.4600 direct 614 410.4677 jgoodwin@dublin.oh.us www.dublinohiousa.gov file: / /C:\Documents and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise \5114D87CDubli... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 4of4 www.twitter.com /dublinohio www.facebook.com/dublinohio This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by Proofpoint PPS and F- Secure for the presence of computer viruses. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned by Proofpoint PPS and F- Secure for the presence of computer viruses. file: / /C: \Documents and Settings \goodjm\Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise \5114D87CDubli... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 1 of Justin Goodwin - RE: Celtic Crossing Development From: Justin Goodwin To: Mount, Jeff Date: 2/7/2013 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Celtic Crossing Development CC: Stanford, Aaron; kevin @stavroff.com Mr. and Mrs. Mount, I have attempted to address each of your questions below. Some of these responses were also prepared by Aaron Stanford on our Engineering staff, whom I've copied to this message. I have also copied the applicant, Kevin McCauley of Stavroff Interests, as he will be better able to provide some of the information you have requested. I will also provide a copy of this correspondence to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration at tonight's hearing. You of course are welcome to attend this evening and to provide comments or pose inquiries during the public comment period. 1. Price Points, Deed Restrictions, and Rear Yard Visibili The city does not require rezoning applicants to provide price point information for proposed homes. I have copied the applicant, Kevin McCauley, to this response so that you may inquire with him directly. Similarly, the city is not involved in the administration of deed restrictions. However, the proposed development plan includes a 15 -foot tree preservation zone along the rear of all lots bordering the metro park. All healthy trees must be preserved within this zone, although dead or noxious vegetation may be removed. 2. Lot 24 and Path Visibili As part of this proposal, lot 24 has been shifted to the north as compared to its location in the previous concept plan. The applicant's engineering consultant, EMH &T, has evaluated the sight distance at the proposed site entrance at Mitchell -Dewitt Road, focusing on the bike path crossing of Mitchell- Dewitt. This analysis found that with the removal of a limited amount of trees and undergrowth at the southwest corner of the site, visibility to this crossing will be improved. Staff has recommended removal of this vegetation as a condition of approval. The sight distance analysis does not indicate that lot 24 will interfere with visibility to the metro park path crossing. 3. Mitchell -Dewitt Site Entrance The traffic impact study, also performed by EMH &T, evaluated the operation of the proposed intersection with Mitchell -Dewitt Road. As this portion of Mitchell -Dewitt Road is under the jurisdiction of Union County, this study was reviewed and accepted by the Union County Engineer's office. This entrance is essential to providing appropriate access for fire response; however, the access point is also necessary to provide appropriate vehicular connectivity and circulation for the residents of this subdivision. The traffic study indicates that a majority of the traffic generated within the proposed site will leave the site at the Mitchell -Dewitt entrance and travel east to Hyland -Croy Road. And conversely, the majority of the traffic entering the site will come from Hyland -Croy, rather than from the west. Because of these traffic patterns, the amount of traffic generated by the site that crosses the existing bike path crossing is projected to be minimal. Note also that the intersection of Hyland -Croy and Brand Road (Mitchell- Dewitt) is programmed to be improved this year. The City of Dublin will be upgrading the intersection from a 4 -way stop control, to a modern roundabout. This will greatly reduce the stacking of traffic at the intersection, especially during peak hours. Staff does not expect this development to become a feasible cut - through, especially with this improvement in place. file: //C:\Documents and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp \XPgrpwise \5113855CDublin... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 2of4 4. Stormwater Management This applicant will be required to meet all applicable City of Dublin and Ohio EPA standards regarding sediment and erosion control. Stormwater requirements will have this site retain and release stormwater runoff at a controlled rate. Additional water volume or velocity will not be produced by this site as the stormwater controls are designed to release the water over a longer period of time. Additionally, the applicant is required to plat a Stream Corridor Protection Zone over the site. This zone is very restrictive and seeks to preserve the flood carrying capacity and the existing riparian habit of the existing channel. I hope you find this information helpful. Please feel free to contact me either by email or phone prior to tonight's meeting if you have additional questions or concerns. Sincerely, Justin Goodwin, AICP Planner II City of Dublin Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614 410.4600 direct 614 410.4677 jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us www.dublinohiousa.gov www.twitter.com /dublinohio www.facebook.com/dublinohio >>> Jeff Mount <gwmount @hotmail.com> 2/5/2013 10:44 PM >>> Mr. Goodwin, We have some questions and some comments on the revised site plan for the Celtic Crossing development. Our house is at 7841 Mitchell -Dewitt Road, on the south side of the road, immediately west of the bike path. First, what is the projected price point and expected deed restrictions for the planned homes? The backs of the homes on the west boundary (lots 24 - 28) will sit directly in our front yard view and we are concerned about what deed conditions will be included for the new homes. Will homeowners be required to maintain a mix of mature trees at the boundary with the park? Second, we are surprised that the eastern lot was the one eliminated on the Mitchell -Dewitt entrance. The western one (24) will provide significant obstruction to users of the bike path attempting to cross the street. We suggest that lot 24 at the M -D entrance also be removed; this suggestion was made by some board members at the last meeting. Third, we have lived here for more than 20 years and the Mitchell -Dewitt curve was dangerous even before the bike path was added. We have seen many close calls since the path opened. We truly believe that it is only a matter of time until there is a fatality. Is there any way to replace the M -D street entrance with an emergency vehicle only access drive with suitable landscaping? Also, given the backup of traffic on Hyland -Croy at congested times at Dublin Jerome, the development's through street will become a shortcut to Mitchell - Dewitt, just as the Oak Park development already is from the south (and the traffic is much worse from the north at the conclusion of school events). Finally, we ask that storm water controls during and after construction be strictly enforced to avoid further file:/ ADocuments and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp \XPgrpwise \5113855CDublin... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 3of4 damage to North Fork Indian Run. This stream was seriously damaged during the construction of the Oak Park development and it has not recovered (Ohio EPA recently cited the siltation at Hyland -Croy Road as a reason, among others, for the stream not attaining water quality standards). With the increased volume and velocity of flow associated with development, and the angle at which the development tributary enters the North Fork, significant erosion may result. Although this confluence is not on the parcel being considered, this potential problem should be investigated and mitigated as part of this development's approval. Please feel free to call if you have questions (Trinka daytime phone 614 -644- 2146). Thank you for your consideration. Jeff and Trinka Mount Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:32:20 -0500 From: ]Goodwin @dublin.oh.us To: gwmount @hotmail.com Subject: RE: Celtic Crossing Development Trinka, You are welcome to provide comment at any time. I recommend sending via email directly to me. All public comment will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission along with the rezoning application. Of course, you are also welcome to attend the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing and speak directly to the Commission as well. You will receive a notice when the case is scheduled for a Commission agenda. At this time, it appears the applicant intends to provide materials for staff review in the near future, with the intent of proceeding for zoning review at the February 7 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. If staff finds the materials sufficient and adds this case to the agenda, the notice will be sent out on January 25. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Justin Goodwin, AICP Planner II City of Dublin Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614 410.4600 direct 614 410.4677 jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us www.dublinahiousa.gov www.twitter.com /dublinohio www.facebook.com/dublinohlo >>> Jeff Mount <gwmount @hotmail.com> 1/9/2013 9:31 PM >>> Mr. Goodwin, Thank you for providing the info about Celtic Crossing. When is the best time to provide comments, or maybe it would be better to know the path and timeline for the project? Trinka Mount file://CADocuments and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp \XPgrpwise \5113855CDublin... 3/1/2013 RESIDENT CORRESPONDENCE Page 4of4 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:18:33 -0500 From: ]Goodwin @dublin.oh.us To: gwmount @hotmail.com Subject: Celtic Crossing Development Ms. Mount, You requested additional information regarding the proposed Celtic Crossing development following last week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The full Planning Report and proposed plans can be found online at htW:lldublinohiousa.aov1pzc /12 -082/ Please feel free to contact me via email or by phone if you have any questions about the proposal. My contact information is provided below. Sincerely, 3ustin Goodwin, AICP Planner II City of Dublin Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614 410.4600 direct 614 410.4677 jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us www.dublinohiousa.gov www.twitter.com /dublinohio www.facebook.com /dublinohio file-//C ADocuments and Settings \goodjm \Local Settings\ Temp \XPgrpwise \5113855CDublin... 3/1/2013 O FINO PL MEDIT4� 0 s O Jerome Township a PUD e ..TUSCANY DR �'�.:CABERNET Q. e �Ci R R F SITE �1F R D • �' i • e e Jerome Township or PUD PUD A a ��I A Hdlrll�ilV Z ~ � Z OAK PARK BLVD Z = CARAWAYq P I 3 319 A D o I 'MYRTLESTONE PLR 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP NN Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan/ ,\ Preliminary Plat ry City of Dublin Celtic Crossing Feet Hyland Croy Road 0 250 500 1,000 ci n of nl Bi Iv Land use and Long Range Planning Sff0051re.rRurg•. Roaa Dub(,, Oho 43016 -1 36 Phorw /IDD 614 41D 4600 Fa, 614 410 web Sae wow. An An Oh us February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153 232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat Parcel Size(s) (Acres): (Section 152.085) [J' Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) ❑ Final Development Plan ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.053(E)) (Section 153.115) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan ❑ Minor Subdivision (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment (Section 153.018) ® Preliminary Plat ❑ Other (Please Specify): (Section 152.015) Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. II. PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 0 HYLAND -CROY ROAD Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): Parcel Size(s) (Acres): i Parcel # / Map # 390024021000 / 1360000105000 +/ -2.149 AC. 390024022000 / 1360000104000 +/- 25.961 AC Existing Land Use /Development: Agricultural Vacant Land IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land use /Development: Residential - Single Family Parks /Open Space Total acres affected by application: +1 - 28.110 AC. 11. L UKKMN I rKUrtK I T VWIVtKII): Please attach additional sheets If needed Name (Individual or Organization): Celtic Capital, LLC 565 Metro Place South Mailing Address: Suite 480 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Dublin, OH 43017 Daytime Telephone: 614 - 764 - 9981 I Fax: 614 - 764 - 2207 Email or Alternate Contact Information: / ^ ell A /�F 0 1... I NOV 012012 Page 1 of 3 CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING r IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed In part 111 Please complete if applicable. Name: Kevin McCauley Applicant Is also property owner: yes ❑' no ❑ Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Celtic Capital, LLC Mailing Address: 565 Metro Place South, Suite 480 Dublin, OH 43017 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614 764 - 9981 Fax: 614 - 764 - 2207 Email or Alternate Contact information: kevin@stavroff.com V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT I PROPERTY OWNER: This is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed In part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Ben Hale, Jr. Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Smith and Hale, LLC Mailing Address: 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725 Columbus, OH 43215 (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: 614 - 221 - 4255 Fax: 614 - 221 - 4409 Email or Alternate Contact Information: bhale @smithandhale.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. 1 Kevin McCauley, member, Celtic Capital LLC the owner, hereby authorize Ben Hale, Jr. to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, Including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: Date: ❑ Check this box If the Authorization for OVfner's Applicant or Rep ative(s) is attactliiill�l a ~ ' �Aument y► ! i Subscribed and sworn before me this day of ?_ 20 � `' `��op 9� CRISTINA E YATES = ti _ �. ;- ` Notary Public State of Ohi. State o iLJ `t ` c> -� Delaware County y Notary Public MY Commission Expires Count of ; ; VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visits to the p Cit ` f ' � November process th is 2016 Ci 5� entiai to s application. The OwnerlAppiicant, as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to vita f c0fra, >:l,d post a notice on the property described in this application. i r r 8 + 1 r . 1 Kevin McCauley, member Celtic Capital LLC , the owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: / Date: 4?, Page 2 of 3 ( �,) 1 Vlll. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission andlor Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. 1 Kevin McCauley, member, Celtic Capital LLC 0 the owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant Signature of applicant or authorized representative: IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT: This section must be completed and notarized. Date: ( 6 h / //L 1 Kevin McCauley, member, Celtic Capital LLC , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The Information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct. to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized representative: t' I Date: �rtttrrr� Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1 2 State of •.•� ' ; CRISTINA E YATES County of IS 'l�� �� Notary Publi �— : Notary Public State of Ohio Delaware County My Commission Expires 0 : November 26, 2016 TF � `• FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Receiv e• 3980 Application No: 2 z W Date(s): l 3 3 2 7 1 P8Z Action: App code Receipt No: 202 Map Zone: Date Received: IZ Received By: City Council (First Reading): ' City Council (Second Reading): 4 / 8 City Council Action: Ordinance Number: Type of Request: ��� ��A� ` ^ •� \, ` N, S, E,oCircle) Side of: 1 ©S, E, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: Distance from Nearest Intersection: 0 Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: V Q Page 3 of 3 I— e r f` f A�eyew o r aae = It e<sm+mu /w,m Ne,,e- Gey vnt, 2�G) tz, re wa mumeroa.,rr bb °e (every ewe s-ak as' N 29' wvp °dance It mere a s w�. f�f wyee I �y IWam "e `w` �ve.°.rS mpe sa ee"o m o ewnnN ,ma vrvme /md Reef °Iw, v 4'¢w,eew I we¢,n— w " ° f a a 1 11,1, vr --w,.vrer I 1,-G IPm reef 1 . a me e qwe� a ver it-, w�ers .. / - I E n� m�ym�f°e wa s n me v � � ew f ret ee+a er vw wwrm .r r ia¢ esaemy ly 1 m me awvme ar..em mrfam-- oew,rcr reeve. —1 et mwym m�mvw, I Poe,- av ® I. ` —, eA a�1e -i >, "� f° m ¢A,ref P.w.e r.x Po,. ,is "n"e".e � ;.'m,`Pmr u` & "ie mM ° nw "e'i� ew"e ` �t v=r s� " " ,row Wt /e e�Mmd tr e"ne n °tee 25.1 xm "c:f mn ass ocre 1-1 I me ¢,¢s awe °I mN HYw fylkod ° m. v°.faey reps[ -or-wY nne N�Nve4 -f�E =4 t nvJ are rr4 cmewpnauc K %JAe. oa:mW ur oa.vxro« ns rr 2a' xeer. ° ree< w,e ¢tlwe -ter aw `1° 211 - 11, 1111 11 eem ar,a„ -e m era.., `e=u rare �a cvmnb .m orfaeem omnw ,arwe ape PoOe +na ° ° ' (pv o /mm PPe twee ¢e5 reee or ¢� Ipf) I. Mg 111 rv m tl b/ 111 m wyef m It rrvsra (I% FNea 1-1 ee9 °/ reme N ex�f) b`y e s I recaN m `Creel ° 9vaf 28x Pepe :5y beF 10- m,c text lr ecPY e -o°r RsM me xep a rat a�f wn ewK)m ro ¢ewe °{� cw„er.ewer. cea,enm as [vrt, a v 1 11121 h (vw.+ms v s N 1ov 0, Ja13 /ov�aC of 01,, fne m m aI m lne re.falY ry»tofwr�� o°'Ymbe. -w �a�ban y- gM1 - 1 4 t IT sa'e l Greyeee6` G mafv g vna .1 lve4 6XCCgXLLYG 2 JN.vC " tlO wax aa, nRtlm rsrw M: a o �ro>a r Z 4g y �9 � 0�8 U g U u� U G Y oxmr C N 2 O m 6� 91 Lul Aul PDP I M,"wb.1 are <<°� "1 e w� 2r �me1, 911 A° H d 7, �ex � , weaf:�p�.°ePw«,���.e �P1- �Nv°e- P.e.t,t •• �.mmce- vr.ve ,elfee I aov (every ev°e / we mmme, -newrc, eom (avery,v.�a s- A' �ymw 19 1. P . , wve we a. ,.evme. -vrwn wm* n.rs .ne riva ns rr 2a' xeer. ° ree< w,e ¢tlwe -ter aw `1° 211 - 11, 1111 11 eem ar,a„ -e m era.., `e=u rare �a cvmnb .m orfaeem omnw ,arwe ape PoOe +na ° ° ' (pv o /mm PPe twee ¢e5 reee or ¢� Ipf) I. Mg 111 rv m tl b/ 111 m wyef m It rrvsra (I% FNea 1-1 ee9 °/ reme N ex�f) b`y e s I recaN m `Creel ° 9vaf 28x Pepe :5y beF 10- m,c text lr ecPY e -o°r RsM me xep a rat a�f wn ewK)m ro ¢ewe °{� cw„er.ewer. cea,enm as [vrt, a v 1 11121 h (vw.+ms v s N 1ov 0, Ja13 /ov�aC of 01,, fne m m aI m lne re.falY ry»tofwr�� o°'Ymbe. -w �a�ban y- gM1 - 1 4 t IT sa'e l Greyeee6` G mafv g vna .1 lve4 6XCCgXLLYG 2 JN.vC " tlO wax aa, nRtlm rsrw M: a o �ro>a r Z 4g y �9 � 0�8 U g U u� U G Y oxmr C N 2 O m 6� 91 Lul Aul PDP I • Celtic Capital, LLC 12- 082CP /PDP /Z 565 Metro Place South, Ste. 480 Dublin, OH 43017 Board of Park Commissioners 1069 West Main Street Westerville, OH 43081 Jeremy A & Amy L Nutting 7787 Mitchell Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 Karen & James Kadar 7766 Mitchell Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 Janet Murray Trustee 7706 Mitchell Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 • Smith and Hale c/o Ben Hale 37 W. Broad Street, Ste. 725 Columbus, OH 43215 Geoffrey W. & Trinka J. Mount 7841 Mitchell Dewitt Road Plain City, OH 43064 Scott A. & Shellie A Wheeler 8383 Hyland Croy Road Plain City, OH 43064 Union County Board Dublin City School District Of Commissioners Board of Education Blyth Family LLC 233 West 6 Street 7030 Coffman Road 7765 Mitchell Dewitt Road Marysville, OH 43040 Dublin, OH 43017 Plain City, OH 43064 City of Dublin Land Use and Long PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Range Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 RECORD OF ACTION phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410 sa.g www.dublinohiau sa . gov FEBRUARY 7 2013 � The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Celtic Crossing Hyland -Croy Road 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat Proposal: A new residential subdivision with 44 single family lots on 28 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy road, north of the intersection with Brand Road. Request: Review and recommendation to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan for a new planned unit development district under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and recommendation to City Council of a preliminary plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations Applicant: Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests Ltd., represented by Ben Hale, Smith and Hale, LLC. Planning Contact: Justin Goodwin, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4677, jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: To recommend approval to City Council for this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application because the proposal is consistent with the Community Plan recommendations for this site and the applicable review criteria for a Planned Development, with eight conditions: 1) That additional landscape buffering be provided on the portion of Lot 24 within the Mitchell - Dewitt scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location; 2) That the development text be revised so as not to prohibit homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within the tree preservation zone; 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan; 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell - Dewitt intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sight Distance exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell - Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and 8) That the applicant provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater Swale improvements prior to approval of the final development plan. *Ben Hale Jr. agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Chris Amorose Groomes Yes Richard Taylor Warren Fishman Amy Kramb John Hardt Joseph Budde Victoria Newell Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Page 1 of 2 City of Dublin PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road RECORD OF ACTION Dublin, Ohio 43016.1236 phone 614.410.4600 FEBRUARY 7, 2013 fax 614.410.4747 www.dublinohlousa.gov The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. Celtic Crossing Hyland -Croy Road 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat Proposal: A new residential subdivision with 44 single family lots on 28 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy road, north of the intersection with Brand Road. Request: Review and recommendation to City Council of a rezoning with preliminary development plan for a new planned unit development district under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and recommendation to City Council of a preliminary plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations Applicant: Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests Ltd., represented by Ben Hale, Smith and Hale, LLC. Planning Contact: Justin Goodwin, AICP, Planner II. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4677, jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us MOTION #2: To recommend approval to City Council for this Preliminary Plat application because it complies with the applicable review criteria and the existing and anticipated development standards, with one condition: 1) That the preliminary plat be revised to identify the Macha Court cul-de -sac island and the Celtic Crossing Drive `eyebrow' loop island as platted reserves prior to submission for City Council review. *Ben Hale Jr. agreed to the above condition. VOTE: 7-0. RESULT: This Preliminary Plat application was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Chris Amorose Groomes Yes Richard Taylor Yes Warren Fishman Yes Amy Kramb Yes John Hardt Yes Joseph Budde Yes Victoria Newell Yes STAF CERTIFICATION I stin Goodwin, AICP Planner II Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 20 3. Celtic Crossing Hyland -Croy Road 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat Chair Chris Amorose Groomes introduced the following Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat application requesting a new residential subdivision with 44 single family lots on 28 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, north of the intersection with Brand Road. She explained that this application will require two motions and both application components will be forwarded to City Council for the final decision based on the Commission recommendations. She confirmed that Amy Kramb, who had pulled the consented case for questions, did not need to hear the staff presentation prepared by Justin Goodwin. Amy Kramb noted that on the Preliminary Plat, Lot 20 there was a 20 -foot utility easement shown, but no 25 -foot rear yard setback was marked. Justin Goodwin said for the corner lot, two side yards are proposed, rather than a rear yard due to the way it relates to adjacent properties. He explained that there was still a rear yard requirement measured per the development text, but it was not platted. Mr. Goodwin said the rear yard would be angled. Ms. Kramb referred to the proposed scenic setback by Lot 24. She noted that it cuts across the back corner of the lot. Mr. Goodwin demonstrated where the previously proposed 35 -foot building setback line on the lots near Mitchell -DeWitt was located on the previous Concept Plan. He said one lot has been eliminated and shifted to the west, northward approximately 18 feet from the Mitchell -Dewitt Road right -of -way. He explained that the applicant is now proposing a variable width setback, of 200 feet on the easternmost portion and where it intersects the rear of Lot 24, about 50 feet from the right -of -way, extending across the rear corner of that lot. Mr. Goodwin said that Planning has asked that the applicant provide additional landscape buffering on that portion of that lot within that 50 -foot zone. He said that piece of the setback also overlaps the tree preservation zone on the lot. He said the conceptual landscape plan showed a landscape buffer south of the lot in the open space reserve, but Planning has asked that they provide additional landscaping on the lot. Ms. Kramb noted that the Preliminary Plat did not have the path shown on the Mitchell -Dewitt Road side, but said she knew that they were still working with the Metro Parks to develop it. She asked if a revised Plat would be necessary to show the path. Mr. Goodwin said if they received approval from Metro Parks to make the path connection, they would continue to show it on the final development plan as shown on the preliminary development plan and it would be included on the final plat. He said explained that the path connection is not being required, but Planning is asking that the applicant make their best effort to seek Metro Parks' approval. Ms. Kramb asked where the offsite swale mentioned in the Planning Report was shown on the plat. Mr. Goodwin said the swale was identified on the plat as a proposed ditch'. Ms. Kramb suggested that the sentence structure or Condition 2 was awkward due to the double negative used. She suggested instead the wording, That the development text be revised to allow the homeowners to maintain the lawn areas within the tree preservation zone'. Mr. Goodwin agreed to reword Condition 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 20 Ms. Kramb pointed out a typographical error in the preliminary plat condition written in the Planning Report. Mr. Goodwin said that Planning would also like to modify the preliminary plat condition to include the proposed out loop as a platted reserve as well. Ms. Kramb asked if there had been any discussion with the school about the students parking within the development during school hours. She pointed out that Scioto High School had posted No- Parking signs throughout the development during specific hours. Mr. Goodwin said he would ask the applicant to address that situation with the schools. Ms. Kramb said she thought the proposed 24 -inch caliper trees were too large and the inch - per -inch should be a lower number. She said in the text it stated that trees measured 6 to 24 inches can be replaced tree -by -tree versus inch - per -inch, but that anything over 24 inches is per caliper. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that she had requested that Claudia Husak to see how many caliper inches that represented. Mr. Goodwin said that Planning has reviewed what the applicant has preliminarily identified for removal and primarily for the stream crossing at Celtic Crossing Drive and along Mitchell -Dewitt Road to improve the site distance to the Metro Parks' path crossing. He said if measured by Code or replacement required per Code that would be approximately 80 trees at 2.5- inches per tree minimum. Mr. Goodwin said with the amount of inches they have currently identified and the requirement as they are proposing, there is one tree they have identified that is greater than 24 inches. He said that tree is actually 25 inches and would require 10 replacement trees. He said the remainder of trees identified thus far would be tree -per- tree or 35 trees would be required as proposed. He said there is a difference of about 54 trees. Mr. Goodwin noted that the conceptual landscape plan seemed to indicate somewhere in the realm of 50 deciduous trees that are simply illustrated, but that would have to be resolved at the time of the final development plan. John Hardt asked where the 24 -inch tree was located Mr. Goodwin said unfortunately, it was located at the Celtic Crossing Drive stream crossing. Ms. Kramb reiterated that she personally would go lower on the number. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that he said there were approximately 54 trees that are not being replaced. She said that he was said that they were 54 trees short of being able to put those on here. She translated that they equaled about 125 — 130 caliper inches per tree, and that the net loss today is 130. Mr. Goodwin said that it was 222 inches. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she was looking for the net gain or loss. She asked if it was correct that the net loss on this property, counting per inch, is about 130. Mr. Goodwin said that was correct, but that does not include the street trees that will be added as required by the Landscape Code. He said he did not know how many street trees would be required. Ms. Amorose Groomes said on this site, she thought there would be at least 30 or 40 street trees would be required. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 14 of 20 Ms. Kramb referred to page DS -1 in the development text, 4A -2 — Lot Setbacks, C — Side yard. She said the word setback' was missing after side yard'. Ms. Kramb said if decisions were made about the tree replacement, obviously the inches would need adjusted. Ms. Kramb referred to the development text, DS -3 — Architectural Elements, E, and said she felt it was too specific to say similar to carriage -style doors'. Ms. Kramb recalled that at the previous meeting, a fence was proposed between what is now to be wet ponds. She asked if there would still be a fence. Mr. Goodwin said there was an option in the development text to continue to have a split rail fence in that area, however where lots border the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, it would not be permitted for those portions of the lot that are still within a small portion of the Zone. He said in those areas, the applicant has discussed having a small wooden post that would indicate where the edge of property line is located, but it was not clear if it would be a fence in those other areas. Victoria Newell and Joe Budde said they had no comments or questions. Warren Fishman said he counted about 161 street trees on the picture. He asked if the picture was accurate. He said there would be at least two trees on each of the 90 -foot lots, and in some cases there would be three trees. Ms. Amorose Groomes said it appeared that the trees were 30 or 35 -foot on center. She said the drawing was not to scale. She asked the applicant if that was truly representative of what the final landscape drawing might look like. Greg Chillog, The Edge Group, 1400 Goodale Boulevard, Columbus, said that the illustrative plan was close, and that was where they would start. He explained that the numbers always vary based on the individual lot layout, where the driveways are, and where the utilities fall. He said it pretty much follows a 35 to 40 -foot run of trees around the perimeter of the site. Mr. Fishman asked what was the distance on Lot 23 between the side yard and the landscaping. Mr. Goodwin said the landscape buffer is drawn on the illustrative landscape plan bordering up to the lot line of Lot 23, but the plants would not be right on the lot line. He said he believed they were intended to vary within the zone. Mr. Fishman asked what the distance there was from the lot line to the water. Mr. Chillog said it was 25 to 30 feet from the lot line to the water. Mr. Fishman asked if the side yards were normal. Mr. Chillog said the side yards were a six -foot minimum totaling fourteen feet. Mr. Fishman asked if that was on both sides of the lot. Mr. Goodwin clarified that the side yards were six feet on one side and eight feet on the other. John Hardt said he was most concerned at the last meeting about the southwest corner, and he appreciated the last lot being moved farther away from Mitchell -DeWitt Road which was an improvement. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 15 of 20 He said he was also concerned that the landscape plan shows a landscape buffer treatment there which potentially will block the sightlines again. He said he would like to defer to Ms. Amorose Groomes for advice on what kind of plant material could be used in a landscape buffer treatment that is relatively low and appropriate for a place where there is a sightline problem. Ms. Amorose Groomes suggested the landscape material not be low, but instead, high with deciduous trees so that you could look underneath them. She said that today, with urban tree growing so prevalent, a clear trunk height of seven feet can be requested. She said that the Commission could specify when there is a final landscape drawing that the trunk height on the trees to be located in that area have a clear trunk height of seven feet which would still give protection and not block the view sheds as much. Mr. Hardt asked if the Commission would see the detailed landscape planting drawing. Mr. Goodwin said that the Commission would see the detailed landscape plan with the final development plan, and it could be handled at that time. He pointed out that the intersection sight distance analysis performed by EMH &T suggests that the landscape buffer area would not be within that sight triangle along the new street or the intersection of the Metro Parks trail. Mr. Goodwin said the sight distance triangle was included in the Planning Report. Mr. Hardt reiterated that he was cautious about the plantings in the landscape buffer. Mr. Hardt noted that the school had public paths and a highly used site, and there was the Park a highly used site, and there was a connection. He said between the two sites, were two residents' front yards. He asked why the path and crosswalk could not go through the Reserve space to get into the Park without going through the front yards. Mr. Goodwin said he believed the primary design reason was to couple it with the Celtic Crossing Drive stream crossing and minimize other crossings. Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests, 565 Metro Place South, Dublin, Ohio said if they took it to the other side with the second stream crossing, there would be more trees removed for two culverts. He said it was the best way to save the most trees and did not require two culvert crossings. He said the location chosen was more economical and it saved trees. Mr. Goodwin said he was not sure that if there was separate pedestrian -only crossing that it would require a culvert, but it would have possibly affected the trees. Mr. Hardt suspected that it really was due for economic reasons. He said he did not buy the tree argument because this configuration is bringing the path through the stream corridor which would have some tree affect. Mr. Chillog said that the trees belong to the Metro Parks. He said they could handle access to the park from their end by working around trees and removing trees on their property, but in order to get one access point through the Park, they would have to go very wide with the footprint and work around where the Parks want it to be routed. He said it was not just economics. He said the path is sited as such by working closely with Metro Parks who do not want to remove trees. He pointed out that on the west, the path curves north to avoid trees and to go through an existing break in the woods. Mr. Hardt referred to the Regional Context Map and said it still showed the previously submitted layout of the development with Lots 24 and 25. Richard Taylor referred to the development text, DS -2 — Permitted Exterior Materials, 2) Trim Materials B) Shutters shall be considered as trim for purpose of meeting the Residential Appearance Code Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission February 7, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 16 of 20 requirements, but the Code actually states, Trim shall be used when shutters are not used'. He said it seemed redundant and therefore should be stricken from the development text. Mr. Goodwin agreed it should be stricken from the text. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she wanted to keep a close eye on the net loss of trees. She said she was not so concerned about counting caliper, as she was the net. She said in her mind, street trees count for the net, so she was hopeful that they get as many of those back as possible. She said it looked like it would be close, so she was okay with that. Ms. Amorose Groomes invited public comments with respect to this application. [There was none.] Ms. Amorose Groomes confirmed that all the Commissioners' questions had been addressed. Motion #1 and Vote — Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Mr. Taylor moved to recommend approval to City Council for this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan application because the proposal meets the Community Plan designation for this site and the applicable review criteria for a Planned Development, with eight conditions: 1) That additional landscape buffering be provided on the portion of Lot 24 within the Mitchell - Dewitt scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location; 2) That the development text be revised to allow homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within the tree preservation zone; 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan; 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sign Distance exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell -Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and 8) That the applicant provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater swale improvements prior to approval of the final development plan. Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, representing the applicant agreed to the above conditions. Ms. Newell seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Budde, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Hardt, yes; Ms. Newell, yes; and Mr. Taylor, yes. (Approved 7 — 0.) Motion #2 and Vote — Preliminary Plat Mr. Taylor moved to approve this Preliminary Plat application because it complies with the applicable review criteria and the existing and anticipated development standards, with one condition: City of Dublin City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, one 43016 1236 Planning Report share 614 410 400 Thurschy, February ], 2013 F. 6 4 410 4747 ion,. s ea Celtic Crossing Case Summary Agenda Item 3 Cm¢Number 12- 082Z/PDP/PP Proposal A new Planned Unit Development for a 28.11 acre site wit 44 single family residen if lots. Request Remew and recommandatlon to City Coundl of a rezoning Sent preliminary development plan for a ew planned unit development district ict under o proN9ons of Zoning Code Se_tlm 153 050. This is also a request for renew and recommendation to Clry Council of a pralmnary plat under to promslons of to sfm�HSaoa�deaaos. aste Loved on Hyland Croy Posed Located on Lowest ads of HNandCroy Road, approxi 1,030 feet noun of to intersstlon wit Brand Road and Mtnell Beat Road. Applicant Kevin Nr^auler, S2vroff Integr Lt., represented by Zen Hale, Smit and Hale LLC. CasMari33er Input Goodwin, AICP, Planner ll 1( 614) 4104671 I] g oodwln CaVUblln.dl.us Planning Recommeandatlon rlpproral of Me rezoning w/M prel /mbrary derebpmenf plan w/M B rontl /fb ; anEApproralofMapradingst plat Rai 1 ranEttMn. Based on Planning's analysis, to proposal meet the Community Plan designation or His site and to applicable review vtterla or a Planned Development Condign Rezoning Bond Preliminary Development lan 1) That additional landscape buRermg be provided on to Coupon of Lot 24 wMm He Mtt bellfavor scenic semad:, provided Had It does not interfere with sNnnwater damage in His location, z) That the development Last be revised s not be preblbrc homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within He tee preservation zonal City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 2 of 22 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan; 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sight Distance Exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell -Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and 8) That the applicant provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater swale improvements prior to approval of the final development plan. Preliminary Plat 1) That the preliminary plat be revised to should identify the Macha Court cul -de- sac island as a platted reserve prior to submission for City Council review. City of Eablln I Planning and Zoning Commissim Case 12- 082Z/PW/pP I Cerro Crossing February ], 2013 Page 3 of 22 120822gDP /PP o 250 500 N oezcoing/Pnell mGm y Ceneloplh2nCPlan/ Preliminary Plat GiryofDublin Celbc Crossing Feet Hyland Croy Rd City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 4 of 22 Facts P ite Area Zoning Surrounding Zoning and Uses 2 parcels totaling 28.11 acres R, Rural District The site is located in Union County and is surrounded on three sides by land within Jerome Township. Surrounding uses and zoning include: East: Dublin Jerome High School, zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District within the City of Dublin. North/ West: Glacier Ridge Metro Park within Jerome Township; a multi -use path runs through the Metro Park immediately to the west of the site. South: Single- family residences (five rural lots) within Jerome Township with frontage on Mitchell -Dewitt Road and Hyland -Croy Road. The Oak Park development is located nearby to the south of Mitchell- Dewitt Road and L is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Developme District. Rectangular shaped site Generally flat, draining from north to south 740 feet of frontage along Hyland -Croy Road and 225 feet of frontage along Mitchell -Dewitt Road A Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ) bisects the site north to south with one -third of the site east of the stream and two- thirds of the site west of the stream Tree rows are located along the site perimeter and stream corridor A high tension power line runs southwest to northeast through the southeast portion of the site within a 150 -foot electric easement January 3, 2013 The Commission reviewed a concept plan for this proposal on January 3, 2013. Commissioners were generally supportive of the proposed land use and layout but agreed that a greater setback along Mitchell -Dewitt Road was needed. Some Commissioners suggested eliminating lots to achieve a greater setback; others recommended the applicant explore changes to the layout of the proposal. The Commission urged the applicant to review the proposed stormwater management facilities for feasibility and maintenance requirements and to further study the Stream Corridor to determine the appropriate width of the protection zone to avoid having home sites encroach into the zone. Commissioners also urged the applicant to address visibility issues along Mitchell - Dewitt Road near the Metro Park multi -use path crossing. Commissioners agreed that a second multi -use path connection to the Metro Park along Mitchell -Dewitt Road was desirable, but most did not feel that a path was necessary on Hyland - Croy Road until future roadway improvements are programmed by the City. June 15, 2009 The site was annexed into the City of Dublin by City Council on June 15, 2009. The site was also transferred from Jerome Township to the jurisdiction of Washington Township for the purpose of consistent fire and public safety service provision. Case Background City of DWin I Planning and Pound Commission Case 12®2 z/poF/pF I coat Crossing Feduary 7, 2013 Page 5of20 Facts Community Plan Future Land Use Recommendations The Future Land Use Map designates this site as Real Mixed Reskouni dequassam indent of 5 owellbrg units do de d) Areas wit bus clagiFlreden am located primarily along the western Carlpbery of the city and are intended m provide a mix of housing types on smatter lot with significant prevision of open space Development goals include the preservation of natural features and the creation of comprehensive greenway systems and open vistas. Density_ The recommended maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre yields 42 lot on His 28 acre site The proposed 44 single famuv lots Is a density of 157 dwelling unit per acre. Land Use Principle 1 recommends that density inn ®ms be weighed agate He overall quality of development passed, Character Hyland Croy Road and Mitchell ewitt Road are both designated as Rural Character Roadways on the Community Plans Roadway Character Map. Applicable design guidelines include'. • Application of generous setbacks ranging from loo m ZOO feet • Integration of open views and vistas into adjacent development perhaps greater than 200 feet in some areas m increase the sense of openness • Prevision of mfonnal landscaping Hot Houses on native plant species and naturalized farms (meadows, wtaeoveers, graces, wetland areas, etc) • Use of trees, fencerema and woodland plantings m provide additional screening and sense of enclosure • Creation of meandering bike paths and sidewalks that are mformaty designed as m not be entirely visible from the roadway • Design of naturalized ponds with aquatic plant and mfarmaledges • Use of stand walls and split rat fences that are taaieonairy used in the muntrvsdd Northwest/Glaccer Ridge Area Plan The Northwest Area Plan depicts this site with street connectivity hom Hyland Croy Road N Mitchell ewitt Road, and pedestrian path connections N the Glacier Ridge Metro Par. The area plan includes additional roadway character guidelines developed as part of the Hyland Croy Road Corridor Character 4uay. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 6 of 22 Revisions Plan Revisions The applicant has revised the proposal to attempt to address the comments made by the Commission at the concept plan review. These changes include: • Elimination of one lot to increase the width of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road scenic setback to the east of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road site entry. • Adjustment of lot lines along the north and west site perimeter to increase the width of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road setback to the west of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road site entry. • Replacement of previously proposed wetland stormwater basins (artificial) with permanent wet pond retention basins. • Preliminary planning for a potential multi -use path connection to the metro park path system along Mitchell -Dewitt Road, pending approval by the Metropolitan Park District. Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Process Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation; the Zoning Code covers all requirements not addressed in the development text. This preliminary development plan establishes a new Planned Unit Development District (Celtic Crossing) with a development text that applies to these 28.11 acres. Plan The rezoning with preliminary development plan includes: Overview • Rezoning the 28.11 -acre site from R, Rural District to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD). Establishing a new development text with requirements for a 44 lot single - family detached homes and 8.75 acres of open space. Development The proposed preliminary development plan includes specific requirements that address the Text zoning and development details for the Celtic Crossing PUD. Details of the text requirements and the proposed development plan are provided in the next sections of this report. Permitted The development text permits single - family detached homes, open spaces and related park ,Uses I I features. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 7 of 22 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Pla M LAPUt ': i Celtic Crossino Drive This street will extend west through the site from a new intersection on Hyland -Croy Road. It will cross a stream running north /south through the site and continue west to a curve at the northwest corner of the site, where an eyebrow' loop will provide access to three lots. It will then extend south to a new intersection with Mitchell -Dewitt Road. A total of 27 lots will have frontage on this street; corner lots may be accessed from the other streets. Macha Court This single - loaded cul -de -sac street will extend south of Celtic Crossing Drive in the east portion of the site, providing frontage for five lots. The plans include an AutoTURN exhibit demonstrating the ability for a fire truck to navigate the cul -de -sac loop. Nemain Court This loop street will run through the center of the site, extending south from two intersections with Celtic Crossing Drive and providing frontage for 17 lots. Open Space The proposal includes 8.75 acres of open space, including scenic setbacks along Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, a Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ), and a stormwater management area along the south edge of the site. Ten lots are along the edges of the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, to the east and west. Seven lots are east of the stream with visibility from the Hyland -Croy Road open space. Seventeen lots are along the north and west property lines, backin up to the Glacier Ridge Metro Park. Density and Densi Lot Sizes The Future Land Use Map designates this site as Mixed Residential Rural Density (Z.5dweiiing units peracre). Development of this site at 1.5 units per acre would yield 42 lots. The current zoning (Rural District) would permit a maximum density of one unit per acre, or 28 units. The proposal includes 44 lots on 28.11 acres for a density of 1.57 units per acre. Concept Plan Update: The previously proposed concept plan included 45 lots. The Planning and Zoning Commission indicated potential support for the number of lots proposed, provided that design issues related to site setbacks along Mitchell -Dewitt Road were addressed. This included either moving or eliminating the two lots nearest Mitchell- Dewitt Road (Lots 24 and 25 on the concept plan). The revised plans have eliminated the lot to the west of Celtic Crossing Drive (previously Lot 24). Lot Sizes The development text requires a minimum lot area of 12,600 square feet. Lot widths are required to be a minimum of 90 feet at the building line, but may narrow to 50 feet at the right -of -way line to accommodate irregularly shaped lots along the loop street, the cul -de -sac, and the eyebrow' loop in the northwest corner of the site. Lots must be a minimum of 140 feet deep. The proposed development plan includes lots that vary in size from slightly greater than one - quarter of an acre to roughly one -third of an acre. The plan includes standard, rectangular lots approximately 90 feet wide, and variable -width lots meeting the dimensional requirements of the development text. Lot depths generally range from 140 feet to 160 feet and will allow for adequate buildable area. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 8 of 22 Details V Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Setbacks Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road are both designated as Rural Character Roadways on the Community Plan's Roadway Character Map. The roadway character guidelines recommend the application of generous setbacks ranging from 100 to 200 feet with informal and naturalized landscape treatments. The text requires a minimum 200 -foot building and pavement setback from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right -of -way, consistent with site setbacks for other residential developments along Hyland -Croy Road. The preliminary development plans shows this setback ranging from approximately 200 feet at its narrowest point (near Lot 1), and widening along the cul -de -sac street (Macha Court) that parallels Hyland -Croy Road. The text also proposes a variable -width building and pavement setback along Mitchell -Dewitt Road, to be measured from the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt right -of -way. The setback ranges from approximately 200 feet at its widest point (east of Celtic Crossing Drive) to 50 feet near the western -most edge of the site. This portion of the setback intersects with Lot 24 and extends across the southwest corner of the lot. The proposed landscape plan includes buffer plantings within the open space reserves to the south of Lots 23 and 24. Additional landscape plantings should be considered for the portion of the 50 -foot setback proposed to extend across Lot 24; however, a proposed stormwater line in this location may be a constraint. Options should be explored during the final development plan process. Concept Plan Update The previously proposed concept plan included a minimum 35 -foot building and pavement setback from the Mitchell -Dewitt Road right -of -way, running through the open space reserves and across the rear of Lot 24 (previously labeled as Lot 25 in the concept plan). The southwest (rear) corner of Lot 24 also intersected the proposed Mitchell- Dewitt Road right -of- way line. This lot has been shifted to the north in the revised plan. The southwest corner of the lot is now located approximately 18 feet from the proposed Mitchell -Dewitt Road right -of- way. The southeast (front) corner of Lot 24 (along the Celtic Crossing Drive frontage) is now located approximately 115 feet from the proposed Mitchell- Dewitt Road right -of -way. As noted above, one lot (previously labeled as Lot 24 on the concept plan) has been eliminated from the revised plan, providing an expanded setback to the east of Celtic Crossing Drive. This portion of the setback ranges in width from 200 to approximately 120 feet between the rp opos Mitchell -Dewitt right -o -way and lot 2 3. Lot Setbacks FTMFFTFFF F1 TU M FF MFUMM FT i UFF FM(11FT MFI UMTTI Fn FFlfflFM fiifli FFM Ffiif FMF IF1 FIfml F1 FFT MTfF1 rTUFTIFIF FFF1 FTITTI FMFi FflFTilfil fRFM Fiiflflll I Fi F MFIFM F1 fiillll FlF FiFi MF Tf1M FF1Ti FMPFIFMFFTM filMFFM FFU Fi MFMMFFi FFIIMMFFn ITIFFTM F MFFFFM F1 FFm MT[n FFTi FFFMIF FIFFF — PM TMMTTM FMFT I FTiF1F FWMFFi FTIFMFi FI MFI FFFFIFFiIFFi Ff FF1FMFF1 M MM FIF1 FMF1 FFiFfi fll FMFM FFFTM FIFFTi FFFM FI fiillll FTI FI FIiFTTI FFM FI MTMFFMF FWMFiFF FI FFfI l FFTMI F1FFTiF(IF1 FI FFM FiFM F M FTIFMTi F1FTm M FT i F17MM fT - M F r FFI City of Dublin I panning and zoning comml :am Case 12®2 z/PDi I coat Crossing February J, AH Fag 9 of 22 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Traffic and Right ofhVav Access This side and a porclon of the Hylanil Road right of ay was annexed into the city of Dublin in 2009. The Union County Engineer maintains jurisdiction over Mitchell ewtt Road. An additional 10 feet of right of ay Is proposed for dedication along Hyland Croy Road and 15 feet of dghtvfway Is proposed for dedication along Mitchell ewitt Road These right of way dedications are consistent with He City of Dublin Thoroughfare Plan The three new public streets are proposed be have 50 Hot lgffiTway and pavement widths of 28 feet "r.F== Proper intersection spacing Is an Important consideration in access planning. The location of He Celtic Crossing Drive intersection with Mitchell Dewitt Road was selected to optimize the safety and funRlonaltty of He proposed Improvement based on the curvature of Mitchell Dewitt Road along the site hontage. This proposed intersection Is approximately Roo feet to He west of He Oakmeadow Drive access be the Oak Park subdivision The location of He Celtic Crossing Drive intersection with Hyland Cony Road was selected be maximize its distance hom the Dublin coming High School access point located approximately 60 beet be He south CMmlzAi uvpashe Discussion at the Concept Plan review deat with the location and function of He Mitchell Dewitt Road access pomp mtluamg He degree be which He access point Is needed. The Washington Township Fire Department has reviewed He proposed plan and confirmed that both He Mitchell Dewitt Road and Hyland Croy Road access point are necessary for fire service The Dublin Fire Code requires single -family development with more Her 30 dwelling units be provide separate fire apparatus access roads The Commissioners requested the applicant verify adequate sight distance to the existing Metro Park multiuse path crossing at Mitchell ewitt Road approximately Do to the West of He pmposed intersection The applicant has prepared a sight distance exhibit illustrating that adequate site distance can be achieved with the removal of some edsfing trees and underbrush within He pmposed Mitchell Dewitt Road right oway and along the west site boundary. C E sh sevAnsta2eEsal Trams The applicant has prepared a Traffic Impact Study Qfs) as part of the preliminary development plan that has been review by both Dublin Engineering and the union County Engineer. This study determined any necessary roaintersintersection y and /or intersection improvements based on He pre9cted trip generation and studied she site's Impact be seven off site intersections in He sWav area The ITS recommends that a left Wm lane be instated on Hyla Road and no additional turn tines are anted on MlNheibewltt R oatl. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 10 of 22 Ow Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plats The study also analyzed the impacts of a potential future conversion of the Hyland -Croy Road access point to a right -in /right -out design based on the Thoroughfare Plan's designation of Hyland -Croy Road for future improvement to a four -lane divided roadway. Widening of Hyland -Croy Road is not included in the City's current Capital Improvements Program and is considered a long -term need based on traffic projections for Hyland -Croy Road in the year 2030. Analysis indicates that both access points will operate at an adequate level of service in the event that the Hyland -Croy access is restricted to right -in /right -out. A roundabout is planned for construction at the Hyland -Croy Road intersection with Brand Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road in 2013. Right -of -way has been acquired for this improvement to the south of the site; construction will not affect the site. This roundabout will provide improved traffic flow to the Mitchell- Dewitt site access. Engineering anticipates the traffic generated by this proposal to be heavily distributed to the Hyland -Croy Road corridor which will greatly reduce the effects of this site on the existing Metro Park path crossing. As an example, this site is anticipated to generate 4 vehicle trips in the AM peak hour that would travel west on Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Sidewalks The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks or multi -use paths be installed on both sides of and Multi- public streets. The development text allows for a combination of four -foot concrete sidewalks Use Paths and eight -foot concrete or asphalt multi -use paths along public streets. The proposed text also requires a three -foot private sidewalk from the front door to the driveway of each residence, except in auto -court driveway configurations. The proposed plan includes four -foot concrete sidewalks on both sides of all internal streets, with the exception of an eight -foot multi -use path along a portion of Celtic Crossing Drive extending from Hyland -Croy Road to the stream crossing. This path will be asphalt where it fronts the entry reserve and concrete where it fronts Lots 1 and 2 and continues across the stream. The path will transition to a standard sidewalk section west of the stream and connect to another asphalt path within the Stream Corridor Protection Zone (near Lot 44) to provide access to the Metro Park north of the site. From this location, a continuous 10 -foot wide multi -use path within the Metro Park will meander to the west and connect to the existing Metro Park path system. Planning and Engineering requested the applicant design and construct a pedestrian crossing at the Hyland -Croy Road intersection with a marked crosswalk and pedestrian- activated warning signal, similar to the system in place at the Hyland -Croy Road/Tullymore Drive intersection. This crossing will provide access to the existing multi -use path along the east side of Hyland -Croy Road (on Dublin Jerome High School property) and to Jerome High School. The applicant has provided letters from the Dublin City School District and the Metropolitan Park District supporting these path connections. Concept Plan Update Planning's recommendation was to provide additional multi -use path connections through the open space setbacks along Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. The Commission generally agreed that a path connection should be installed along Mitchell- Dewitt Road from the proposed Celtic Crossing Drive intersection as a connection to the Metro Park path west of the site. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 11 of 22 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan The Metropolitan Park District recently communicated to the applicant that its standard policy Parking Architecture is to permit only one multi -use path connection from individual developments to the metro parks path system. The District has given the applicant the choice of installing either path connection shown but not both. The applicant has chosen the north path connection. For this reason, the development text was changed to not require a path connection along Mitchell - Dewitt Road. Planning recommends that the applicant continue to work with the Metro Parks District to pursue a possible exemption to this policy. The revised plans currently provide sufficient space along the Mitchell -Dewitt frontage to allow for a path connection if it is permitted by in the future. This potential path connection is on the proposed landscape plan, but not the preliminary plat. The Commission generally supported waiving the standard path requirement along Hyland - Croy Road because the timeline for future roadway improvements that would extend this path to the south is unknown, and the applicant included a pedestrian connection to the existing multi -use path on the east side of the road. The City Engineer has agreed to waive this path requirement. On- street parking will be allowed on one side of the new public streets, opposite the waterline and fire hydrants. The 20 -foot minimum front yard setback will all space to park vehicles without overhanging the public sidewalk. The proposed development text describes the general character of the development as one -, one and a half -, and two -story homes with a variety of two- and three -car garages. The text requires adherence to the Residential Appearance Standards of the Dublin Zoning Code unless otherwise stated. The text includes additional design requirements for lots with high visibility from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Materials Permitted exterior cladding materials include brick, thin brick, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered wood, fiber - cement siding, stucco or any combination of these materials. Stucco is not permitted on lots with visibility from Hyland -Croy Road (Lots 1 -7) or with visibility from Mitchell -Dewitt Road (Lots 23 and 24). Permitted trim materials include wood, engineered wood, vinyl, aluminum, EIFS, copper or fiber- cement products. Roofing materials include asphalt, wood, slate, concrete, tile or metal. Color Cladding materials are required to be of a natural earth tone and /or warm neutral color (including white). High - chroma colors are not permitted. Architectural Details The text requires similar architectural design elements and details to be consistent on all elevations of a structure (i.e. "four- sided" architecture). Chimneys must be finished with masonry and constructed with a foundation integral to the overall structure. Prominent side facades with high visibility (e.g, homes on corner lots, end lots, pie- shaped lots and lots adjacent to a large open space) are required to contain a combination of architectural design elements as defined in the Residential Appearance Standards. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 12 of 22 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Architectural Diversity The development text includes a lot diversity matrix prohibiting the same or similar front elevations on adjacent lots, lots directly across the street from one another, and lots on a cul- de -sac bulb. Planning identified some technical inconsistencies and omissions in the diversity matrix and recommends that the applicant work with Planning to revise the matrix prior to Council review. Garages and Driveways All homes are required to have either an attached or detached garage, sized to accommodate two vehicles. Front -load, side -load and auto court style garage configurations are permitted, with some location specific limitations. • Standard front - loaded garages are prohibited for lots with high visibility from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road (Lots 1 -7, 23 and 24). Garages on these lots must either be side - loaded or court- loaded. • For Lots 1, 2, 23 and 24, garage doors must face away from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road. • For auto -court layouts with visibility from Hyland -Croy Road (Lots 1 -7) courtyard driveways must be brick, interlocking concrete pavers, stamped concrete or architectural concrete finishes. Other garage and driveway design requirements apply to all lots. • All garage doors must have a decorative and upgraded design, described as being similar to "carriage- style" doors. • For auto -court configurations a minimum 30 -inch high wall or hedge is required along the front edge of the courtyard pavement facing the street. • For side - loaded garages, a minimum 36 -inch high, 75% opacity hedge is required along the rear edge of the driveway pavement to prevent headlight pollution into adjacent properties. In addition, Planning has requested that the applicant incorporate requirements to avoid the snout house' effect that can occur when attached garages protrude in front of the house and dominate the street frontage. The proposed development text prohibits front - loaded garages that extend more than six feet forward of the front fagade of the house or porch. No more than 40% of all lots are permitted to have a front - loaded garage that extends beyond the front fagade of the house. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 13 of 22 Details MM9 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Tree Tree Preservation Preservation A 15 -foot tree preservation zone is proposed at the rear of the 17 lots bordering the Metro and Tree Park. The development text prohibits trees from being removed from this zone, except where Replacement necessary for the installation or maintenance of utilities as approved in the final development plan. Removal of dead, diseased or noxious trees and other vegetation is permitted. The preliminary plat includes stormwater utility easements in the rear yards of 13 lots. Some of these easements are adjacent to, but do not overlap, the tree preservation zone. The text includes. A requirement that disturbance by maintenance must be restored as nearly as practicable to the original condition of the tree preservation zone should be clarified to refer specifically to utility maintenance, and not prohibit homeowner maintenance of unvegetated portions of the tree preservation zone that may be converted to lawn. Concept Plan Update At the concept plan stage, the applicant indicated a potential need to install a stormwater swale along the north site boundary to collect and divert overland drainage from 28 acres of adjacent Metro Park land. If necessary, this improvement would likely effect existing trees within the tree preservation zone. The applicant has since coordinated with the Park District to agree on the installation of a swale on the Metro Park property in conjunction with multi- use path planned to the north of the site. This off -site improvement is indicated on the preliminary plat and serves to minimize the potential impact on existing trees. Tree Replacement The proposed development text outlines a goal to preserve as many trees in good or fair condition as possible. A detailed tree replacement plan will be required with the final development plan. The Zoning Code requires that protected trees (trees six inches in diameter or greater and in good or fair condition) be replaced on an inch for inch' basis with deciduous trees. The applicant is proposing a waiver to this requirement in the development text, as follows: • Trees that measure between six and 24 caliper inches may be replaced tree for tree', rather than inch for inch.' • Trees that measure 24 caliper inches or greater must be replaced inch for inch' as required by Code. The waiver will require approval by City Council. The applicant has provided a tree survey that preliminarily identifies 304 inches for removal, with 222 inches in good or fair condition. Twenty -two protected trees have been identified for removal in the location of the proposed Celtic Crossing Drive stream crossing. Four additional protected trees must be removed at the southwest corner of the site to meet intersection sight distance requirements. Among those currently identified for removal, one tree (a 24- caliper -inch Red Oak) would meet the proposed inch for inch replacement requirement. The development text requires replacement trees to be deciduous trees with a minimum caliper size of 2 1 /2 inches, consistent with Code requirements. The proposed landscape plan indicates that replacement deciduous trees will be located throughout the open space reserves. The landscape plan also indicates a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees as a buffer planting along lots 23 and 24 in the Mitchell -Dewitt open space setback. Evergreen trees will not be permitted to count towa tree replacement requi rements. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 14 of 22 [Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Open Space The subdivision regulations require the dedication of at least 1.88 acres. The plan includes and 8.75 acres of proposed open space (31% of the total site area), consisting of scenic roadway Landscaping setbacks, the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, and stormwater management areas. The development text states that these open spaces will be owned by the City. The applicant will be responsible for the initial landscaping of the open space areas and the homeowners association will be responsible for maintenance. Landscape Character The proposed text describes the general intent for landscape character within the development, consistent with the recommendations of the Community Plan. The text describes a design intent to balance naturalized and formally maintained landscape elements, using low- maintenance design that contributes to the rural character of the area. Specific landscape requirements and design guidelines are provided for both the Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell- Dewitt Road open space setbacks. The Hyland -Croy setback will include open, naturalized areas featuring no -mow or low -mow grasses, transitioning to formally maintained areas along streets and around entry features. The Mitchell- Dewitt setback will include a landscape screen between the residential lots and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, composed of evergreen and deciduous trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs. Each of the open space areas may include additional amenities, such as pedestrian paths and entry features. Entry features will include fencing, masonry columns, integrated neighborhood identification signs, landscaping and lighting. Stormwater features are also proposed within these areas. Landscape Plan The applicant has also prepared an illustrative, conceptual landscape plan that shows the general design intent of the proposal and conformance with the development text. The proposed landscape plan is consistent with the roadway character landscape recommendations in the Community Plan. Details regarding the open space landscaping will be required at the final development plan stage. In addition to the scenic roadway setbacks, an open space area is proposed along the south property boundary between the Stream Corridor Protection Zone and the Mitchell -Dewitt entry. This area will be used primarily for stormwater management. A naturalized, low -mow grass treatment is proposed for this area. The development text requires a line of demarcation' along residential lot lines that abut open space areas, including the Stream Corridor Protection Zone and the stormwater management area. This requirement is intended to prevent encroachment onto the public open space areas, where low- maintenance landscape treatments are proposed. Permitted demarcation elements include the use of a low, split rail fence, wood posts at property corners, and landscaping. The landscape plan indicates the general location of this treatment, but specific design details will be provided with the final development plan. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 15 of 22 Details Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Stormwater Utilities and Utilities The site will connect to the public water and sanitary sewer systems by constructing new water and sewer mains extending to the existing utility lines along the east side of Hyland - Croy Road. Adequate capacity exists in these systems to serve this development. Stormwater Management To accommodate anticipated stormwater drainage, and to meet the requirements of the Stormwater Code, the applicant will install a public storm sewer system that will connect to the proposed retention basins. Catch basins will be installed in some rear yards and open space areas. The plan includes two separate stormwater management systems: • A wet retention pond is proposed to the east of the cul -de -sac within the Hyland -Croy open space setback. • Two wet retention basins connected by a shallow swale are proposed to the west of the stream, in the open space reserve along the south site boundary. Both systems will outlet into the existing stream, once the stormwater has been adequately treated. An off -site swale will be installed on along the multi -use path planned to the north of the site within the metro park. This swale will collect and divert overland drainage from the Metro Park and will outlet into the existing stream immediately north. The applicant should provide verification of construction and maintenance agreements for the off -site stormwater swale to be constructed on Metro Park property with the final development plan. The applicant has provided a stormwater management report and floodplain analysis which demonstrate that the proposed stormwater facilities will adequately manage runoff quantity and quality. Engineering has identified a potential encroachment of the 100 -year stormwater surface profile for basin 1 on the rear of lot 23. A refined stormwater analysis and design will be required as part of the final development plan and adjustments should be made as necessary. Final location, design and maintenance requirements for all stormwater facilities will be approved with the final development plan. Stream A Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ) bisects the site along a tributary to the North Fork Corridor of the Indian Run. This SCPZ is intended to preserve the flood water capacity of the existing Protection drainage way and limit stream erosion through the preservation of existing vegetation. The Zone width is determined by the contributing drainage area upstream. The floodplain analysis conducted by the applicant indicates that the necessary width is 50 feet on each side of the high water mark for the existing channel. Stream Crossing Celtic Crossing Drive crosses the SCPZ in the north portion of the site with a stream culvert and a co- located utility easement, which will require tree removal. Stormwater facilities will be outside of the protection zone but will require easements through the zone allowing for drainage outfalls on either side of the stream. Pedestrian Path Connection The proposed plans include a multi -use path connection to the metro park running through the SCPZ east of lot 44 with plantings between the path and the lot. The applicant should work with Planning and Engineering during the final development plan process to ensure the i _ path is locat with minimal impact on existing trees. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 16 of 22 Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Relationship to Proposed Lots The proposal shows small portions of the SCPZ overlapping the rear yards of seven lots and the side yard of one lot. The applicant proposes to plat these overlapping areas as a defined "On -lot Stream Corridor Protection Zone" with specific requirements and limitations outlined in the development text. All of the overlapping areas are within platted setback or easements. The preliminary plat shows the overlap areas varying in width from less than 1 foot to approximately 14 feet at the widest point (on Lot 8). Lots 2 and 3 are also located adjacent to but not overlapping the SCPZ. The development text allows on -lot portions of the SCPZ to maintained as lawn; these areas are currently used for crop production and do not include the naturally- vegetated portions of the stream corridor. Portions of the SCPZ between private lot lines and the existing tree line are proposed to be planted with a naturalized, low -mow grass treatment. The development text requires an "open space /lot line demarcation" as described earlier. Concept Plan Update The previously proposed concept plan was developed prior to the detailed floodplain analysis that has been performed as part of the preliminary development plan. The concept plan assumed a wider Stream Corridor Protection Zone (63 feet on each side of the stream). At that width, the ten lots along the SCPZ encroached the zone to a greater extent than currently proposed. L Analysis � _::-IV Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for CProcess a rezoning /preliminary development plan (full text of criteria attached). Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. i 1. Consistency with Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the Zoning Code, except as Dublin Zoning Code appropriately altered in the proposed development text. 2. Conformance with Criterion met with Condition: The uses and density proposed for this site are adopted Plans consistent with the Future Land Use designation and meet the intent of the roadway character guidelines. The applicant should provide additional landscape buffering on Condition 1 the portion of Lot 24 that is included in the Mitchell- Dewitt Road scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location. 3. Advancement of Criterion met: This proposal conforms to the Community Plan and is compatible general welfare and with the surrounding residential development and adjacent parkland. orderly development 4. Effects on adjacent Criterion met: The proposal is appropriately located in the city and will safeguard uses the value of property within and adjacent to the area. Proposed stormwater basins are sited and designed to preserve existing trees along the existing residential properties to the south. Tree preservation zones are proposed along the metro park boundary. City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 17 of 22 Analysis Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan 5. Adequacy of open Criterion met: The open space is adequate for residential development and the space for residential maintenance responsibility of the open space is appropriately that of the development homeowners association. The development text contains requirements for the landscape design of naturalized areas within the open space. 6. Protection of Criterion met with Condition: The applicant has performed a floodplain analysis natural features and that identifies the appropriate size and location of the Stream Corridor Protection resources Zone. Impacts to this zone will be minimized, with the exception of the steam layout and intensity crossing and necessary stormwater outfalls. Existing tree rows along the site 11. Stormwater perimeter will also be preserved. The proposed development text should be clarified Condition2 to allow homeowner maintenance of unvegetated portions of the tree preservation 12. Community zone that may be converted to lawn. 7. Adequate Criterion met: With the proposed improvements installed, the site will have access infrastructure to adequate utilities. 8. Traffic and Criterion met with Conditions: The applicant has provided a traffic analysis pedestrian safety which accounts for the proposed future development impacts. The applicant will be 13. Design and required to install a left turn lane and pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road as Conditions 3 & 4 recommended by the traffic study. Existing trees and other vegetation should be Condition7 removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt intersection as indicate on the Intersection Sight Distan Exhibit. 9. Coordination & Criterion met with Condition: The proposal is consistent with the existing integration of building development patterns of surrounding Dublin subdivisions. Small portions of the &site relationships Stream Corridor Protection Zone will overlap some adjacent lots, but adequate buildable area is provided on all lots to prevent impacts on the stream corridor. Condition S Lots with high visibility from Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road have been oriented to minimize visibility of rear and side facades. Proposed landscape plantings will provide additional visual buffering where side facades would otherwise be exposed. Gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 should be augmented with additional trees and /or other landscape materials to minimize the view of rear yards from Hyland -Croy Road, to be approved as part of the final development plan. 10. Development Criterion met: The proposed plans contribute to the orderly development of this layout and intensity site, including proposed uses, setbacks, and density. 11. Stormwater Criterion met: Adequate provision is made for stormwater management. management 12. Community Criterion met: The proposed text outlines all applicable development requirements benefit for this project. Proposed pedestrian connections to the Glacier Ridge Metro Park and Dublin Jerome High School provide benefits to the wider community. The Condition 6 applicant should continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of this path connection as part of the final development plan. 13. Design and Criterion met with Condition: The proposal outlines high - quality building appearance materials and architectural design standards within the proposed development text. Condition7 Staff has identified some technical inconsistencies and omissions in the diversity Conditions 1) That additional landscape buffering be provided on the portion of lot 24 within the Mitchell -Dewitt scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location; 2) That the development text be revised so as not to prohibit homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within the tree preservation zone; 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan, subject to approval by Planning; 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt Road intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sight Distance Exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell- Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 18 of 22 r matrix and recommends that the applicant work with Planning to revise the matrix prior to Council review. 14. Development Criterion met: The plans indicate a single phase for this project. phasing 15. Adequacy of Criterion met: There are adequate services for the proposed development. public services 16. Infrastructure Criterion met with Condition: The applicant will be responsible for constructing contributions off -site improvements, including utility connections, pedestrian facilities, and roadway improvements. Engineering has not identified a need for financial Condition 8 contributions to other off -site infrastructure improvements. The applicant should provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater swale improvements prior to approval of the f inal develop plan. Recommendation ANW_ Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval with 8 conditions is recommended. Conditions 1) That additional landscape buffering be provided on the portion of lot 24 within the Mitchell -Dewitt scenic setback, provided that it does not interfere with stormwater drainage in this location; 2) That the development text be revised so as not to prohibit homeowner maintenance of lawn areas within the tree preservation zone; 3) That the applicant construct a left -turn lane with a pedestrian crossing on Hyland -Croy Road, prior to Conditional Acceptance of the subdivision improvement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 4) That gaps in the existing tree row along the rear of Lots 1 and 2 be augmented with additional trees /and or other landscape materials as part of the final development plan, subject to approval by Planning; 5) That existing trees and other vegetation be removed with the construction of the Celtic Crossing Drive /Mitchell -Dewitt Road intersection as indicated on the Intersection Sight Distance Exhibit; 6) That the applicant continue to work with the Metropolitan Park District to seek approval of an additional path connection along Mitchell- Dewitt Road for inclusion in the final development plan; 7) That technical inconsistencies and omissions in the lot diversity matrix be revised prior to Council review; and City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 19 of 22 Recommendation Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan 8) That the applicant provide verification of formal agreements with the Metropolitan Park District and the Dublin City School District regarding the timing, construction and maintenance responsibilities for all off -site multi -use path and stormwater swale improvements prior to approval of the final development plan. V_ Details Preliminary Plat of land into 44 single - family lots and 8.75 acres of open space. The plat also provides new rights -of -way for Celtic Crossing Drive, Neiman Court and Macha Drive, and additional rights -of -way for Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -Dewitt Road, consistent with the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed preliminary plat subdivides 28.11 The preliminary plat correctly shows all setback requirements. All other information required by the Subdivision Regulations, or as otherwise required by the proposed development text, is provided in the proposed preliminary plat. The Zoning Code requires the dedication of 1.88 acres of open space; 8.75 acres are provided. • Reserve "A" - 1.06 acres located to the north of the Celtic Crossing Drive entry at Hyland -Croy Road. This reserve includes a multi -use path connection along Celtic Crossing Drive and extending to the west. • Reserve "B" - 4.2 acres to the south of Celtic Crossing Drive and incorporates the largest portion of the Hyland -Croy Road setback. The plans show a wet retention basin within this open space. This reserve also includes a portion of the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, which should be more clearly delineated on the Final Plat. • Reserve "C" - 2.82 acres in the south portion of the site, extending from the Stream Corridor Protection Zone to the entry of Celtic Crossing Drive at Mitchell - Dewitt Road. The plans show two wet retention basins in this reserve, connected by a shallow swale. This reserve also includes a portion of the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, which must be more clearly delineated on the Final Plat. Reserve "D" - 0.21 acres located to the west of the Celtic Crossing Drive entry at Mitchell -Dewitt Road. This reserve provides adequate space for a multi -use path connection to the Metro Park path system immediately to the west of the site, subject to approval by the Park District. The path connection is illustrated on the conceptual landscape plan submitted as part of the preliminary development plan. Reserve "E" - 0.46 acres including the northernmost portion of the Stream Corridor Protection Zone to the north of Celtic Crossing Drive. This reserve includes a multi -use path connection from Celtic Crossing Drive to the Glacier Ridge Metro Park; this path will extend through the park and connect to the existing path system. Plat Overview City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 20 of 22 minary Plat The development text indicates that the open space areas will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by a forced /funded homeowners association. This requirement will be reflected on the Final Plat. The landscape island on the Macha Court cul -de -sac bulb has not been indicated as a reserve. Planning recommends this landscape island also be a reserve maintained by the homeowners association. Rnalysis Preliminary Plat Process The Subdivision Regulations identify criteria for the review and plat. Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1) Plat Information Criterion met with Condition: This proposal is consistent with the and Construction requirements of the Subdivision Code and proposed development text and all Requirements required information is included on the plat. The preliminary plat should identify the Macha Court cul -de -sac island as a platted reserve prior to submission for City Council review. Homeowners association maintenance Condition 1 responsibilities will need to be outlined on the Final Plat. 2) Street, Criterion met: Street widths, grades, curvatures, and intersections designs Sidewalk, and comply with the appropriate Code sections and engineering requirements. Bike path Sidewalks or multi -use paths are required on both sides of all public streets in Standards compliance with City construction standards, except as specifically waived in the development text. I 3) Utilities Criterion met: Utility lines are adequately sized and located to serve the development and provided within appropriately sized and accessible easements. 4) Open Space Criterion met. The plat meets and exceeds the open space requirement. Requirements J V t tecommenclation Approval This proposal complies with the preliminary plat criteria and a recommendation to City Council for approval of this request is recommended with 1 condition. Conditions 1) That the preliminary plat be revised to should identify the Macha Court cul de -sac island as a platted reserve prior to submission for City Council review. approval for a City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 21 of 22 REZONING/ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. In the case of a combined rezoning /preliminary development plan and final development plan, the final development plan is not valid unless the rezoning /preliminary development plan is approved by Council. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; City of Dublin I Planning and Zoning Commission Case 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP I Celtic Crossing February 7, 2013 Page 22 of 22 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. If approved, the preliminary plat will be reviewed at a later date by City Council. If the Commission disapproves the preliminary plat, it must state its reasons for doing so. Approval of the preliminary plat is effective for 24 months and authorizes the developer to proceed with construction after meeting all Engineering requirements. The Commission and City Council will later review the final plat for each phase, generally after infrastructure is complete, to ensure that it conforms to the preliminary plat. Review Criteria: In accordance with Chapter 152, the Code sets out the following requirements as part of the platting requirements for the subdivision of land: 1) The proposed plat provides the minimum plat contents required by Sections 152.018(6) and 152.018(C); 2) The proposed plat will comply with all applicable subdivision improvement procedures as defined by Sections 152.035 through 152.053; 3) The proposed plat will provide required improvements as specified by Sections 152.065 through 152.072. fo CL W �1 ^ E ^ O ' P fo E W ^ 0 � \ CL 0 r� HYIAN� -COY ROAD .a ��... Z pa� z � LLJ 0 d� p O 0 uai De LU W u�i a Z 0 a a F N a a a W a W w O j Z LL a H V X F Z< 3 m o LL 0 N W a O Z J m d o _ r 8 0000000000 Eli ,0 awr 4 C, �A h N I 1 , It ' c . 1 �iY I �• 4 3� a n <im Z ' LL ' .. - .- �K • \ \ \' - -'" — "'"` --," - � l` 1 (Y /L \ ea fu fo it VF LC \ \ m`` S•' 5W _ •� H�' r.{ B e i � Y \ e. y tT s R � � / r / °� � • : � �� ,r 1 1 I 1 � � 'fir, 1 1 1 :.<::. 1 �� c ici of Dublin DRAFT Land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 www.dublinohlousa.gov PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF DISCUSSION JANUARY 3, 2013 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Celtic Crossing 12 -082CP Proposal: Request: Applicant: Planning Contact: Contact Information: Hyland -Croy Road Concept Plan A new residential subdivision with 45 single family lots on 28 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy road, north of the intersection with Brand Road. Review and non - binding feedback on a concept plan for a potential new Planned Unit Development District under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests, Ltd., represented by Ben Hale, Smith and Hale LLC. Justin Goodwin, AICP, Planner II (614) 410 -4677, jgoodwin @dublin.oh.us RESULT: The Commission reviewed and commented on this proposal for a new Planned Unit Development. Commissioners were generally supportive of the proposed land use and layout but agreed that a greater setback along Mitchell -Dewitt Road was needed. Some Commissioners suggested eliminating lots to achieve a greater setback while others recommended the applicant explore changes to the layout of the proposal. The Commission urged the applicant to review the proposed stormwater management facilities for feasibility and maintenance requirements and to further study the Stream Corridor to determine the appropriate width of the protection zone so that home sites would not have to encroach. Commissioners also urged the applicant to address visibility issues along Mitchell -Dewitt Road near the Metro Park multi -use path crossing. Commissioners agreed that a second multi -use path connection to the Metro Park along Mitchell -Dewitt Road was desirable, but most did not feel that a path was necessary on Hyland -Croy Road until future roadway improvements are programmed by the City. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chris Amorose Groomes Richard Taylor Warren Fishman Amy Kramb John Hardt Joseph Budde Victoria Newell STAFF CERTIFICATION Justin Goodwin, AICP Planner II 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Devk lopment Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 12 Amy Kramb sai nowing that t text does not 'nit the amount f verbiage or t ngs they can p on these signs w s a concern. S e said there re five eight -f t tall signs o Hospital Drive on approximate) one - quarter of mile. She said he hoped ther would not be I of text placed n the signs. She s id in general, s was fine with t application an the three condi ons. Warren F' hman said that a appreciated t e number of si s that hoped at the signs wood be kept simpl and streamline with a font were nee ed at a hospital a said he as ple as possibl He said the /estr building is im ressive, and h hated for it to/be cluttered wi a lot of signs- He said the se' signs seem necessary for a Hospital and had no proble with them. de referre o the propose hysicians Offic sign at the rourtf portico entran e, and asked w addre was not in th blue panel wh a there is a litt arrow with no ote to it. He id people will have difficult time fi ding it if they d not know which ttreet number it Jim Lytle sae that the same reet number w used for enter building. He sai that if they ad ed the number on a sign, it /d. be redundant cause it is inched on the main dentity sign in ont and on the pre ary can a main entrant for the buildin He explained t entrance dow farther is for sport medicine and physicians o y, and that therwas an additio al access throu the main buildin hat could be us Victo is Newell said erall, she was wa ending signs w e good. She ag �gns hora of signs, ut when She 1 everywhere Ms. Newell co Iii along Avery-Mu' field Drive and r mo Motion and ote Mr. Fishma moved to app r ve this review cri ria and existing evelopmi 1) 3) 6 support of thi application. Sh said she thougl t the additional ed that when Inking at the ov ralI sign plan, tot it was a larg rough the sit , it did /noee ike she was btnbarded with t ented the a licant f the proposalfor address sign ge ng the sign here. mend Final Develo because it meets the plicable it sta dards with thre : f (Fhat the height f Sign 05 rema sign to the no side of the ent That the ap cant include inf r sign permit pplication; and / `at six feet and at the applicai)t� be permitted t relocate the drive off Hospi I Drive; ation regard' g necessary ea /ement encroac ents with the That the pplicant provid a landscape demonstr to that each siqkf base is to be I< Mr. Taylor secgfnded the The vote WY(s as follows: M/! Amorose G Mr. Taylor,(yes; and Mr. Fistman, yes. (Al 2. Celtic Crossing 12 -082CP n for each grVund sign with a sign permit o taped in accoedance with the Zing Code. yes; Ms. Kr b, yes; Mr. Bud8e, yes; Ms. Ne�ell, yes; 6 -0.) Hyland -Croy Road Concept Plan Chair Chris Amorose Groomes introduced this Concept Plan application for review of a new residential subdivision with 45 single family lots on 28 acres on the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, north of the intersection with Brand Road. She explained that Concept Plan applications offer the Commission the opportunity to provide non - binding feedback to the applicant and staff on proposals for a new Planned Unit Development. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 12 Justin Goodwin presented this Concept Plan for a potential rezoning to a Planned Unit Development located on the western periphery of the City, west of Hyland -Croy Road, north of Mitchell - Dewitt Road, directly to the west of the Dublin Jerome High School practice fields. He said the site is surrounded by Jerome Township, and to the north and west is the Glacier Ridge Metro Park which includes a multi -use pathway system near the site. He said in the 2007 Community Plan, Future Land Use Map the site is cited as Rural Mixed Residential which recommends a maximum density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre, therefore this 28 -acre site could yield 42 residential lots. He said the site is located within the Community Plan's Northwest Glacier Ridge Area Plan, updated in 2011 as part of the Hyland -Croy Corridor Character Study He said the Hyland- Croy /Brand Road roundabout that is scheduled for construction this year will not impact this site. Mr. Goodwin said this proposal is consistent with the recommendations of the Area Plan. He pointed out on the Area Plan graphic that there were intended Rural Character treatments shown along Hyland -Croy Road and that a portion of this site was visible in the image showing potential realignment of Hyland - Croy Road in the future. He said there were no immediate plans to do that, but the open space setback shown there is a more naturalized low -mow grass type of treatment, consistent with the Glacier Ridge Metro Park and some of the other treatments on open space frontages along Hyland -Croy Road. Mr. Goodwin said this area is also included on the Community Plan Roadway Character Map where Hyland - Croy Road and Mitchell - Dewitt Road are designated as Rural Character Roadways and there are a variety of design recommendations included in the Plan, including generous setbacks ranging from 100 to 200 feet, maintaining open views and vistas within and through development, informal and naturalized landscaping treatments, fencerow preservation, meandering bike paths, and naturalized ponds. Mr. Goodwin described this site as generally flat, draining from north to south, surrounded on most of its perimeter by existing tree rows, particularly to the north and west along and adjacent to the Metro Park. He said there is also a stream running through the site with a designated Stream Corridor Protection Zone (SCPZ). He said the boundaries of this corridor are determined by Engineering through preliminary analysis. Mr. Goodwin said the applicant is working with Engineering to complete a more refined analysis and the result of it could yield adjustments to the stream corridor boundaries. He said a 150 -foot high - tension power line easement runs through the corner of the site. Mr. Goodwin explained that 7 of the 45 single - family lots will be located in the eastern portion of the site, east of the stream. He presented the concept plan showing the Stream Corridor Protection Zone where portions of some of the rear yards of the lots may encroach into portions of the SCPZ. He said the refined analysis being performed by the applicant will provide more information so that it can be understood how much encroachment will occur and whether or not adjustments will be necessary. Mr. Goodwin said the two access points will be at Hyland -Croy Road and Mitchell -DeWitt Road, connected by a street running through and across the stream. He said a cul -de -sac will provide access to the south in the eastern portion of the site, and a central loop street will be located to the west of the stream. Mr. Goodwin said the applicant has proposed a minimum 200 -foot wide open space setback along Hyland -Croy Road consistent with the Rural Roadway Character Guidelines, the recommendations of the Corridor Character Study, and the Northwest Area Plan. He said within that open space setback, a naturalized low -mow grass treatment is shown on the plan, consistent with recommendations of the Community Plan. He said portions of that area would abut the proposed stormwater retention wet pond in the open space setback. Mr. Goodwin said that the naturalized treatment would transition into more formal mown areas along the entry drive and the front cul -de -sac. Mr. Goodwin said to the west, the proposed building setback is shown from the future right -of -way of Mitchell -Dewitt Road. He said the applicant has proposed a 35 -foot setback that would include entry reserves on both sides of the access point and for a portion of the southwestern -most lot, the setback would be platted onto the rear corner of the lot. He said that Planning recommends the Commission discuss whether this approach is consistent with the recommendations of the Communitv Plan. HP Sam 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 12 Mitchell -Dewitt Road also has a Rural Roadway Character designation. He said the applicant is proposing vegetative buffering in these open space reserves, along Lots 24 and 25, to screen those homes from the right -of -way. Mr. Goodwin said the applicant has noted that there are shorter setbacks from existing rural homes within Jerome Township along Mitchell -Dewitt Road as well. He said the rear corner of Lot 25 is proposed to intersect the future right -of -way of Mitchell -Dewitt Road as well. He demonstrated on the Concept Plan approximately where the 100 -foot setback from the Mitchell -Dewitt Road right -of -way would be located and suggested that the Commission discuss this issue. Mr. Goodwin said to the west of the stream corridor is another open space reserve area between the existing rural lots to the south and the proposed lots along the central loop street. He said this would also include a naturalized no -mow grass treatment, and would include stormwater treatment for the western portion of the site. He said that stormwater treatment would be provided through two wetland basins with a naturalized vegetative treatment connected together by a shallow swale. Mr. Goodwin said that at the narrowest portion of this reserve, it is about 60 feet from the existing site boundary to the nearest proposed lot line. He said that Planning and Engineering both support approaches such as this to implement sustainable stormwater treatment and more naturalized or low- maintenance landscape treatments; however, staff has concerns about the functionality and long -term maintenance issues that could arise with this treatment in this location. He said more information is needed to understand how this area would be accessed and maintained over the long run. He said it was very close to the residential lots, and there are concerns about potential conflicts between the homeowners and the more naturalized treatment in close proximity to their lots. Mr. Goodwin said the applicant has proposed to install a two -rail, split rail fence within the open space reserve along the rear of all adjacent lots, to delineate where the lots end and where the reserve begins. He said that the applicant also proposes to extend the split rail fence treatment through the SCPZ to the rear of the lots that encroach partially within that zone. He said that will require additional analyses by Planning and Engineering. Mr. Goodwin said existing multi -use paths are located to the east of Hyland -Croy Road along the Dublin Jerome High School practice fields, and to the west of the site within the Glacier Ridge Metro Park. He said is the path within the Glacier Ridge Metro Park crosses Mitchell -Dewitt Road to the west of the site and connects to the southern portion of park. Mr. Goodwin said the applicant proposes a multi -use path connection extending from the Hyland -Croy Road access point along the entry drive and across the stream, then connecting to another multi -use path running through the stream corridor protection zone and into the Glacier Ridge Metro Park. He said that the applicant is working with the Metro Parks to arrive at an agreement to construct a path extension along the north boundary of the site, feeding into the existing path system within the park. He said that the applicant also is proposing a formal pedestrian crossing at Hyland -Croy Road, providing connection to the existing path system to the east. He said they are proposing a pedestrian activated signal similar to the one at Tullymore Drive and Hyland -Croy Road. He said the applicant is working with the Engineering regarding that potential improvement. Mr. Goodwin said that Planning and Engineering support these efforts to provide this continuous path connection, but there are additional path connections that should also be considered with this development. He pointed out that there was no path connection proposed along Hyland -Croy Road to the south property line. He said if there were a path connection, it would stub at the property line of an existing residential lot in Jerome Township. Mr. Goodwin said as mentioned earlier, the Brand Road roundabout will be constructed this year which will include a path connection around the roundabout itself, but not a path connection along Hyland -Croy Road. He said the expectation is that with future roadway improvements yet to be programmed, that path connection would be provided, so they would like to see a stubbed path that could be connected in the future to provide additional access for residents of this development to the south of Mitchell -Dewitt Road. Mr. Goodwin said this proposal also does not include a path to the west of the Mitchell -Dewitt Road access point. He said this location is very close to the existing Glacier Ridge Metro Park path crossing at Mitchell -Dewitt Roarl. HP said staff recommends 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 12 considering another path connection which would provide a continuous loop system for residents of this development and another alternative access point to the Mitchell - Dewitt Crossing. Mr. Goodwin said as described in the Planning Report, Planning recommends the Commission provide feedback on the following design issues warranting additional consideration: 1) Is the proposed number of lots (45) appropriate for this site based on the proposed site design? 2) Does the proposed building setback and landscape buffer along Mitchell - Dewitt Road adequately meet the intent of the Rural Roadway character guidelines? 3) Is the wetland stormwater system appropriate in the proposed location as it relates to nearby residential lots? 4) Should additional multi -use path connections be included in this development? Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, representing the applicant, Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests, Ltd., said that they had worked closely with the Metro Parks and they are very excited about the proposed path because it provides an access to the park across from the school. He said they had further studied the stream, and based on the more defined studies, the width of the area needing to be protected is actually smaller than shown on their map, and the lots will no longer be in the Stream Corridor Protection Zone, subject to Engineering's approval. He said they will be required, as part of this development, to construct a left turn lane at the Hyland -Croy Road intersection, so that there will be improvement to Hyland -Croy Road to help people get in and out. Mr. Hale said all the lots in this proposed subdivision are 90 feet and can take side - loaded garages. He said they have committed that lots that front Hyland -Croy Road will have no stucco and all will have side - loaded garages. He said they had no problem with staff's suggestion that along Mitchell - Dewitt Road, they make another path there so that people can access the Metro Parks path system. He said Lot 25, because the SCPZ is smaller, can be moved back. He said the setbacks are consistent with the setbacks of the residences across the street and to the west. Greg Chillog, The Edge Group, spoke regarding Lots 24 and 25 and the appropriate setback and /or treatment to maintain a rural character along that section of Mitchell -Dewitt Road. He defended the setback form the road for these lots by citing examples of the setbacks for surrounding rural homes. Mr. Chillog said as drawn on the current plan, the structure on Lot 24 is approximately 95 feet away from the edge of pavement and Lot 25 has a distance of about 70 feet from the edge of pavement. He pointed out that they were not the 35 or 40 feet that exists along portions of Mitchell -Dewitt Road, but were closer to the 75 to 90 -foot range that is consistent along the north side of Mitchell -Dewitt Road. He also expected that the further study of the SCPZ would allow them to rework some lots and allow an even greater setback from Mitchell -Dewitt Road for Lots 24 and 25. He said they are planning on a planting buffer so that while driving along Mitchell -Dewitt Road, views will be focused into the wide -open area of the Metro Park. He said they believed the request for an additional stub of the path along that edge would fit into that area. He said within the buffer, they are proposing a strong evergreen screen from the front setback line to the rear of the lots, and in front of that, more deciduous ornamental -type trees to create a more rural and natural approach. He said they would also incorporate the same type of natural treatment that they anticipate on the east side, which is similar to what exists on Mitchell -Dewitt Road, including low - mow grass, wide open areas, and a few trees, but it would be a little more manicured around the areas that people are going to be in contact with such as around the sidewalk edges, lots, ponds, and entry features. Mr. Chillog said the two ponds referred to in the Planning Report were wetland areas where they thought the best solution, given the proximity of the wetland research area and the other Metro Park wetland features, was to implement those types of stormwater management facilities. He said the stormwater areas would not be any larger or smaller than if they were wet ponds. He said however, changing to a dry facility would drastically increase the size that they would need to be, so they thought this was a good alternative. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 12 Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if their preference was for wet or dry facilities. Mr. Chillog said that they were proposing a wetland treatment which would be dry during portions of the year, and wet during the other portions of the year with very specific wetland -type plantings which would be monitored through an establishment period and maintained. He said there will be different areas within the facility. He said some of the areas will be wet most of the time and others will be inundated under a stormwater event. He said it was a solution not seen much in this area. He said they designed wetland shelves at Tartan West, behind the condominiums on the southwest side of the site. He said the wetland facilities will be located within a more naturalized environment that will not require much mowing or vehicular access to maintain them. Mr. Chillog said the short; two -rail split rail fence is proposed to help delineate the public open space area from the rear yards of the residential lots. Ms. Amorose Groomes invited public comments with respect to this Concept Plan application. Jeremy Nutting, 7787 Mitchell -Dewitt Road, Plain City, Ohio, who lives across from the proposed entrance, said he had concerns with the Mitchell -Dewitt Road setback. He said that part of Mitchell - Dewitt Road should have as much of the rural character as Hyland -Croy Road with the Metro Park nearby. He said the path crosses Mitchell -Dewitt Road and opens into the field. He said the current layout shows Lots 24 and 25 very near the path in addition to being very near the road. He said it was not in keeping with many of the other great designs of other Dublin subdivisions. He said he also had concerns with the access on Mitchell -Dewitt Road, especially in the summer and spring when there is the most use of the bike path. He asked if a turn lane was proposed. Mr. Goodwin confirmed that the preliminary analysis conducted by the applicant did not suggest that a turn lane on Mitchell -Dewitt Road was warranted. Mr. Nutting was concerned it was not a safe area with the bike path, the 45 mph speed limit, the curve in Mitchell -Dewitt Road and traffic coming in and out of this proposed subdivision. He said even as it exists, he has seen some very close calls with bicyclists and pedestrians trying to cross Mitchell -Dewitt Road. He suggested it would be ideal not to have the access there or to have turn lanes with a safe access and sight lines. He said if the only access was at Hyland -Croy Road, that would provide additional setbacks and there could be a bike path access on that end for residents to use. He said preserving the character of the park was important because once it is gone, you cannot get it back. Ms. Amorose Groomes, after checking for additional public comments, invited the Commissioners to ask questions or comment on issues that needed to be addressed, guided by the discussion points suggested in the Planning Report. Warren Fishman said he appreciated that this was a difficult site to layout. He noted that the proposed density was under two units per acre which could not be said was too dense. He said the obstacles were the high- tension wires, the stream that has to be preserved, and the Mitchell -Dewitt Road access. He said he felt this had to have a 200 -foot setback, not 100 -foot. He said to maintain a natural setting, pine trees and a landscape buffer will not prevent the subdivision from being seen. He said although the existing houses, some of which were built 50 years ago, are closer to the road, this is a clean slate to work with now. He said the existing houses are on an acre to five acre or larger lots. Mr. Fishman said regarding Lots 24 and 25, he thought they should be located somewhere else in the subdivision. He said a much better treatment was needed at that corner of the site. He said they needed to make this a grand entrance like on Hyland -Croy Road to keep the natural appearance. Mr. Fishman said he also wanted to keep the houses as far as possible away from the stream. Mr. Fishman asked if there would be a homeowners association to maintain the proposed split rail fence. He pointed out that throughout Dublin, even in established developments where they have associations; those kinds of fences are always in poor condition. He said he was concerned that there will be a aood, 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 12 forced and funded association to maintain the fence. He said the wet /dry ponds will need an expert to maintain them rather than a typical lawn service hired by the association to mow the grass. Mr. Fishman reiterated that he thought the Mitchell -Dewitt setback needed to be 200 feet instead, and that it could easily be done by changing the location of Lots 24 and 25. Joe Budde said he agreed that the number of lots was appropriate, but that the setback needs to be greater. He said he was concerned about Mr. Nutting's comments. He said he wondered if there was a way to eliminate the Mitchell -Dewitt Road access, have a 200 -foot setback, and still maintain the proposed number of lots, Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if two separate accesses would be required by the Fire Department. Mr. Goodwin said the Fire Department expressed a preference to have two separate access points. He said the Fire Department would have to analyze if an access into a cul -de -sac would be adequate for emergencies from Hyland Croy Road. He said that staff supports having two separate access points. Mr. Budde said he thought the proposed multi -use path connections made sense. Victoria Newell said she was not overly concerned with the density in terms of housing, but she was concerned about Lots 24 and 25. She said she thought the setbacks for Lot 25 need to be preserved along the street frontage in particular, taking into account the No -Build Zones, the 35 -foot setback, and Reserve 'E.' She explained that it was very common for the Board of Zoning Appeals to review setback variance applications when homeowners are pinned in so many directions and want amenities such as decks, play structures, or swimming pools. Ms. Newell said she had a minor concern on Lot 7 in terms of the utility easement since it almost paralleled the property line of the site, and was overlapping the lot. She suggested that the property line and easement should line up with each other because they are so close as a courtesy for the homeowner since they really cannot do much in that area. Ms. Newell said she liked the bikepath connection and extending it into the Metro Park. She said she saw merit in providing the connection along Mitchell -DeWitt Road and she was less concerned about the connection on Hyland -Croy Road because of how far into the future the City is planning. She said it has always bothered her when a path was created when there was a no bike or multi -use path that it would connect to in the near future. Ms. Newell said she liked the idea of having the wetland area between a wet retention and dry detention area, but she was equally concerned how it was really going to maintained and how the water is going to be truly filtered. She said EPA regulations had to be complied with, but the issue of how it will be landscaped and maintained in the future is different. Amy Kramb said she was okay with the density. She agreed that Lots 24 and 25 should be eliminated to provide a larger setback and larger entrance. She said that also would provide room for the bike connection from the development to the Metro Park so that it would not feel squeezed in to give an open feel to the park. She said that the two proposed entrances would provide a better traffic flow than one entrance. Ms. Kramb said giving more room and open space at the Mitchell -Dewitt Road entrance would help visibility. Ms. Kramb said she assumed that the northern path through the Metro Park, once built, would be owned by the Metro Parks who will maintain it. She said the new path added by the developer would probably be their responsibility coming out of the neighborhood on the south side. She said the paths should be constructed and maintained the same. Ms. Kramb said she was not in favor of locating the suggested 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 12 path along Hyland -Croy Road, because it is not known what the City will do with the road in the future and how it would fit. Ms. Kramb said she liked the idea of the split -rail fence, but there definitely needed to be a buffer between the rear yards and the wetlands. She said that an access for maintenance would need to be considered if the there was a split rail fence there. John Hardt pointed out that the Community Plan recommends a density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre. He said if this density was lowered by removing a couple of lots, it would solve many of the problems mentioned. He encouraged the applicant to consider that change. He said the wetlands approach to stormwater management is okay with him. He said this idea of a grassy meadow with a split rail fence exists already in some areas of the Metro Park. He said that east of Hyland -Croy Road on Tullymore Drive there is an orphaned piece of land owned by Metro Parks that has exactly that situation, and he was not aware of any complaints from those neighbors. Mr. Hardt said he agreed with the Planning recommendations about the connectivity on the paths with a couple of edits. He referred to the discussion about a signalized crosswalk similar to that at Hyland -Croy Road and Tullymore Drive. He said that as Mr. Nutting previously mentioned, there were many people using Mitchell -Dewitt Road as a path to get to the Metro Park. He said he has seen rollerbladers, bicyclists, and dog walkers in the road. He suggested that the path being proposed to the north of the site be brought directly out to Hyland -Croy Road rather than through the development, with a pedestrian crossing to the north to connect to the high school. He said he wondered if that might do a better job of providing a path to the Metro Park other than the roadway, and asked if Engineering thinks that the crossing needs to be at the intersection. He said he thought that option would give people a route to the Metro Park without them feeling like they have to go through the neighborhood. Mr. Hardt said he did not know if that was 'the' answer, but he was interested in having something like that explored. He said he also wondered why, realizing it would not connect very far today, there are not pathways along the steam corridor, as has been done in many other areas of the City. He said ultimately, paths end up being connected and the best bike paths follow the streams throughout the City. Mr. Hardt said the southwest corner of the development was his biggest concern. He said the applicant did not create this problem, but the Metro Park path crossing is a nightmare. He said he had instances, particularly in the summer, when the trees are leafed out, where he has had to wait there when trying to cross the road and rely on his ears to tell him if a car was coming. He said he was concerned about the houses crowding the intersection, and particularly concerned about heavy landscaping in that location. He said he did not have a strong preference as far as what the setback ought to be dimensionally or precisely what the landscaping ought to be there. He said what he is more concerned about is that when it is done, there is an improved sightline on Mitchell -Dewitt Road either immediately at this development's entrance or at the Metro Park. He said as it exists, it was a disaster waiting to happen. Richard Taylor said he had a concern about the density, but not because of the numbers. He said because of the way the applicant had to deal with the obstacles that exist on the site, that it is nice, open, and relaxed on the east side and then everything is crammed into the bottom at the west side. He said something needs to be rearranged so that the two lots are not as close to the road as shown, and eliminating the two lots would be the easiest solution. He suggested there might be a way to shuffle the lots around. He said the 200 -foot setback on the eastern side of this property is wonderful, but it is across the street from the marshland near the Dublin Jerome High School stadium, and a large part of the high- tension line easement. He said if there were an arrangement of houses that encroached on that a little and eliminated the difficultly of the southwestern corner of the development, he would be willing to give up a little space in the 200 -foot setback on Hyland -Croy Road because there will never be any additional development facing it across the road. He suggested rather than having the three north /south roads, there might be a way to have the bottom portion of the loop street extend further to the west, making one big loop, rearranging those lots, and having a stub road comino from that connection down 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Crov Rd Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 12 to Mitchell- Dewitt, without any lots on it. He said it seemed that way they could have almost, if not the same number of lots. Mr. Taylor said there would be a similar circulation on the site and the Mitchell - DeWitt intersection could be moved away from the corner the two lots would no longer be in that location. He said that it was not really the location of the property line that was the issue on these lots, but the location of the house. He said if lots along Mitchell -Dewitt were facing north, rather than east and west, they would be as if they had a large rear yard that would be counted in the setback area, which might solve some of that problem. He suggested that be considered. Mr. Taylor said because there were so many obstacles on the site, he did not know if there was a way to deal with it, but it always seemed like a lost opportunity to him that these landscaped retention ponds with the fountains and other amenities are in front. He suggested instead locating this somewhere in the middle of the site where it can be an amenity for the residents of this development. Mr. Taylor asked if the applicant's intention was to sell the lots to builders or was one developer going to build the homes. He also asked if it had been decided if there would be design guidelines for the houses. Kevin McCauley, Stavroff Interests, 565 Metro Place South, Dublin, Ohio, said design guidelines have not been decided. He said they have been working with Planning to create a text that will have satisfactory standards. He said they are only developing the site and will not be building individual homes. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she thought all the comments made have been very valuable and she agreed with almost all of them. She said she thought it was important to keep the Mitchell -Dewitt Road intersection clear. She said if they could get to a density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre that would be preferable to her rather than pushing the limit which will become a standard practice. She said the Commission would like to be consistent and try to hold to that. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she had a great deal of concern about the wet and dry ponds. She said she was involved with the development at Dublin Jerome High School, where two of the worst wet /dry basins in the City are located. She said she thought when the Army Corps of Engineers selects a wetland mitigation site, and it is next door, that should tell a lot about the character of the soils in that area. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that they really need to get it right. She said she was not at all willing to even flex to something that may or may not be a great solution. She said the front area of the high school is a mess because they can never get into it to clean it out. Ms. Amorose Groomes said it was not really wet or dry. She said it had cattails, was unsightly, and probably unsafe, given the mosquito populations because it does not function as a living system. She said it is going to be very important to make whatever is done on this site function as living systems that cleanse and filter themselves rather than just stagnate and become problematic. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would be interested in seeing what details the applicant brings forward. She said she did not think they could get them dry to make truly dry basins with the water table in the area. She said she doubted, given the site's proximity to the wetland mitigations in the Metro Park, that it would be feasible. Ms. Amorose Groomes said that they will have to figure out good ways to manage the wetland basins, which probably will involve working with someone on the State level to get that kind of information. She reiterated that she did not think they can be dry and they will have to be wet. She said that designing them to be made alive' is going to be very important. Ms. Amorose Groomes said she would not be averse to having a fee -in -lieu paid for some of the path construction that might serve the City's and community's long term needs. She said it would be nice to get some connectivity to the Metro Park from the high school and she would like to take advantage of those ideas, but in terms of north and south along Hyland -Croy Road, she thought a fee -in -lieu would be appropriate and the money can be put in the coffers so when that roadway gets addressed there are funds to put the pathways on this site. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd DRAFT Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission January 3, 2013 — Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 12 Mr. Fishman asked if Ms. Amorose Groomes felt a homeowners association would be capable of maintaining the area if it was not a straight wet pond. He said he preferred a wet pond because they seemed to be easier to maintain. Ms. Amorose Groomes said it was hard to say without seeing the design details. Mr. Fishman said he would be opposed if the density was not below 1.5 dwelling units per acre. He said that the Commission did not want to set a dangerous precedent for future developments. He said he thought the entrance problem could be easily resolved if the proposed density was reduced. Ms. Amorose Groomes said it was a nice development. She said she really appreciated the design and the difficulties that the site gives and the 90 -foot lots. She said there are a few hurdles left to make it right, but she was supportive of a project like this on this piece of property. Ms. Amorose Groomes invited additional questions or comments. Mr. McCauley asked if Ms. Amorose Groomes preferred a wet pond rather than wetlands. He said that there is room and engineering said it will work just as every other wet pond in Dublin works. He said that their engineers said that this is a better environmental solution, but he wanted to do whatever is easiest and what the Commission wants. Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that the wetland mitigation and the habitat were adjacent. She asked why a micro - habitat would develop there when there is a macro - habitat nearby. She said they are hard to design and manage. She said that the smaller they get, the harder they are, and these were really small. She said that is why when the Army Corps of Engineers picked out the Metro Park for wetland mitigation, it was designed to be large. She said she would not hesitate to see them just be a wet basin because there is a lot of habitat already in the vicinity, but that was just her thought. Ms. Amorose Groomes thanked everyone and said after they worked with staff she looked forward to their return. She explained to the residents attending the meeting briefly about the next processes. She said if the applicant decides to pursue this development, they will continue to work with staff on many of the details they discussed tonight and will submit a formal application. She said those who received a notification of this hearing will be notified when the application is placed on the Commission Agenda. She said that the application will be reviewed by the Commission possibly two times, and then it would likely go to City Council another two times for a final action. She summarized that there would likely be four more public meetings held with regards to this proposed development before it would come to fruition. Claudia Husak explained that notifications of this informal review were sent to property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the site. She invited those who did not receive a notification to provide addresses to ensure that they will receive notice regarding any future hearings. Ms. Husak said case information is posted on the City's website. Ms. Amorose Groomes said the Commission looked forward to seeing something soon from the applicant. Commission Roundtable Steve Langworthy announced that the State of the City will be held on March 14th, the same date as a scheduled Commission meeting. He said that alternate meeting dates will be sent to the Commission to consider and vote on a new date at the February meeting. Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if there were any other comments. [There were none.] She adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dubl n City Council Meeting September 8, 2009 Page 8 Held _ - - — - - -- Y, WaLace Maurer. 74 Dubin Road asked for arifical on in theme^ ^ page one. tender *Ad�ustme - l'ne one - wh;ch mdi as *from 2012 to 201 On page rsvo under Parks - n' - it indicates 'from 12 to 2010 Mayor Chinnia- archer responded that is reflects Council's ction to accelerate the protects f 2012 to the 2010 CIP Vice Maya 'ng emphasized philoso at parkland acquit he bud going forward. No t Ms. G by added that Council hi ' no later than the first on t Drdinan a Mr ng, yes Mr. Leckrder ere was engthy d ou'd remain an im lost sight of that. sted a review of C of 2010. A rber, yes; Mr Mayor Chinn in about the priority for the paridand acquisition Ms. Salay. yes; Vjb Mayor yes-. Mr Keen . Ordinance 46-09 Petitioning the Board of County Commissioners of Union County, Ohio to Adjust the Boundary Lines of Jerome Township so as to Exclude That Territory Which, as a Result of Annexation, Now Ues within the Corporate Boundaries of the City of Dublin, and Declaring an Emergency. (Celtic Capital LLC Annexation of 39 8 +/- Aces - Ordinance 08-09) Mr. Smith stated that this relates to the Stavroff annexation, and the ordinance a lows the City to 6 e a petition for the boundary adjustment from Jerome to Wash ngton Township. Staff is requesting emergency act'on so that the reparations schedule 'or Jerome Township wi be effective as soon as possible. Mr Reiner moved for emergency passage Mr. Gerber seconded the motion. Vote on ft motion: Mayor Ch nnia- Zuercher, yes, Vice Maya Borrig, yes Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecidlder, yes; Mr. Keenan. yes; Ms. Sa'ay yes; Mr Gerber yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Leddider, yes; Ms. Salay. yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes- Maya Chinnic- Zuercher, yes; Vice Mayor Bonng- yes; Mr. Reiner yes Ordinance 47 -09 Rezoning Approxim 4.18 Acres, Lo n the /tion Co r of the Intersection of Shier ngs Road and Eite n Roadu istrict to HDP, High Density D District within lure Ce Center. vation (Case 0 7Z) Mayor Ctunn a- tr stated that the ,cant s reprr. Underhii has requested thar and postpone the a m for 30 d Mr Gerber to postpone the ante to the Octnal meeting. Mr. Reiner iced the motion. ote n otI n. Mr Gerber. Mr. Leddider yes, yes, Mayor Chmn a Cher, yes, V ce Me ring. yes• Mr Re . Salley, yes ce48-09 :jo izing the Provision ern Incerntives f utposes of rn I ctin n of the Ohio Fuel Coalition (OFCCWi the City of ' preneurial Center, d Authorizing the Ex ution of an Ec FAr McDaniel noted thjfte Executive D ectorjfte Ohio Fuel Cell Cojpkn could mot be present ton a to trave He a ti's appreaation ouncd s consderation of gtslation. Maurer 51 'n R ask here the headquart f this company are loca id it center of product I& Md)arae sponded that hey are adquartered n Ceve This will serve as a Central O office for the compan . his is a t•ade organs on representing a number of at cel companies and re is ro production i ved. 12 -082 2 /PDP /PP Celtic Croy � ii .g Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minute% of Dublin City Council Meettnf Held - August 17 2009 Page 3 -- - - --- - - - ��` accordan with the Cormun.ty P, and try to maximize titntlty with the 7Rein areas. o further discus moved to treat ord inance as em legis ation. econded the am. V010 90 t V Boring. Yes: Mr. an, Yes; Mr Re ner, , '4rr Gerber, yes; Mr er, yes, Mayor Chinntci ercher, yes, Ms Salay V Mr Renter, yes, Mr. ;der, Yes: Mayor Ch - Zuerdter yes Vice Mayan B es, Mr. Keenan. yes; slay, Yes. Mr. Gerber, Ordinance Authorizing 2 City Manager / ve G h the City of Col eel North of State usive Dublin Expat r noMd this is the con 43-09 pr ovides for t to the current exdusrve Dublin n ed area and xd f this leg to nto a Modification of rand Sewer um Ohio in Order to t Approximately 277 7=10sharing 161/Post Road and W t of Hyland-Croy Ro rea, and Declaring mergency. Mon piece of egislafio Ordinance 43 -09. arrange. s: th s p ece author and sewer agreemen that the 277 sixes ce area The 'and Is' nbfied ,n the current emer is ve Dublin expans area. Staff recorn Ms. Salay moved for rgency passage. V ee Mayor Boring nded the motion. V go the mdMF Mr. Ledt:;der, yes' Vi ycr Boring, yes; Ms. lay, yes; Mr Reiner, yes; Mr yes; Mayor Chi Zuerdter, yes; Mr. K n, yes. Mr Gerber. yes' .r Ledtlider. yes Mr. man. Yes; Vice Mayor Boring yes- Salay, yes, Mr. Reinter es, Mayor Chinntci - .Yes vratn 45.08 Ame the City of Dublin ntial Building Code (rddifnance omply with J Mr. T reported that there are updates regarding no further quesW r comments. V Mr yes Mr Reiner, ; Ms. Salay, yes: V ng. yes; Mr. Ledttider, , Mayor Chnn °ci -Zue yes. Mr Keenan, IMMOUCTIONTIRST Apt CE Ordinance 46-09 Petitionhtg the Board of County Commissioners of Union County, Ohio to Adjust the Boundary Lines of Jerome Township so as to Exclude That Territory Which, as a Result of Annexation, Now Lies within the Corporate Boundaries of the City of Dublin, and Declaring an Emergency. (Celtic Capital LLC Annexation of 39.8 +, - Acres Ordinance 08-09) Ms Salay introduced the ordnance Mr Smith stated that this legisla relates to the boundary adjustment for the Sawalf p ece, and was part of the pre - annexabon agreement approved by Council The applicant wi I pay ad of the reparat?ons due the townstvp. He recommended that Counc approve Ihs on September 8' There 's no necessity for emergency passage tonight There w -I be a second -eadirgrpub.'c Kean ^g at the " uesday. September 8 Counco meeting Ordinance 47 -09 Rezoning Approxi aly 4.18 Acres, Locat on the Northea/RuDlstrict f the Intersection of Rings Road and Elt an Road, from k to HOP, High Den POD District within future Central Ohin Center. (Case ^ 07Z) Mr Ledthde oduced the ordinance. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland L roy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Cmu cn a+uo.a�«c_r�+po w.a June 15, 2109 Held _ _ . 'tt Mecling Page 2 POSTPONED ITEM Ordinance 08-09 Accepting an Annexation of 39.8 Acres, More or Less, in Jerome Township, Union County, to the City of Dublin. 'Petitioner: Celtic Capital LLC) Mr Foeg`er stated that the proposed annexation has been reviewed at a previous meet ng. The - lem was postponed peed r g resol bon of the pre - annexation agreement. which Counc, has now approved. Staff recommends acceptance of the annexation. Mayor Ch'nmd Zuercher asked who has been handl'ng the negotiations with Jerome Township. Mr. Foeg er responded that previous d scussions have occurred with Jerome Township, but the township gas no! been party to the most recent discussions. Mayor Ctunnid- Zuercher noted that the staff report states that, °The negotiations between the Township and the petitioner on the reparations issue were ultimately unsuccessful.' Mr. Foeg er responded that is correct The initial approach was to attempt to have the petitioner provide a cash payment upfront to prepay the reparations. That effort was not successful. What was successful were the terms of the pre - annexation agreement Council has now approved, winch passes those reparat ons costs on to the developer. Those costs will be reimbursed as lots are recorded and will be based upon the City s assessment of what the tax ob'igatons wou d be at that time. Vice Mayor Boring stated that she is confused. Jerome Township has stated that they do not have the ability to service people in the incorporated area, so If the developer proceeds, what happens to those residential units? Mr. Foegler responded that the agreement will provide for Washington Township to provide the rre and life safety services. In regard to what reparations will be due to Jerome Towns p, the reimbursement agreement has been set up to cover the worst case scenario, should full -level reimbursement be required for not only the Townsh pis base tax obligation, but also for the Are and life that is built into it. The City should be covered under both scenarios The developer WI bear the cost of reparations, whatever they are ultimately determined to be W M noted that on page 2 of the mono. paragraph 2, sentence 1, it Indicates that the obligation of Dublin to pay reparatons to the Township Is ncurred if Dublin changes the Township boundary after the annexation is comp ete. How would that occur? Does the boundary change in some way? Is it the right -of- way that is causing the inab: ity to measure the impact on the boundaries? Ms. Grigsby responded that In the past, when the C ty annexed property into the City that was not In Washington Township, the City petitioned to extend the Washington Townsh p boundaries to be coterm nous with the new'and that is annexed That process ;s what ss referred to in the memo. Mr. Smith stated that to change the township boundaries, the City would file a petition with the Union County Commissioners, which they would have to approve under the Supreme Court ru rig on this topic. Mr Maurer stated that the implication is that If the boundaries do not change hen no reparations are paid. Is that correct? Mr Smith confirmed that is correct. Mr. Maurer noted that on page 2, paragraph 3, sentence 1 of the staff memo t states that "the goal n negotiatng a pre- annexation agreement is to ensure that the petitioner is responsib for any reparations That are due to the Township over a 12- year reparations period." Is the 1 2-year reparations period defined by Slate Code? Mr. Smith confirmed that is cored. Mr. Maurer nqu f there are reparations to be paid, would they be paid over a 12 year penod? Mr. Smith responded aff Volt on the -Ord trance Ms. Sa ay, yes. Mr. Reiner. yes. Mayor Chi, nio- Zuercher, yes, Vice Mayor Boring; Mr. Leckl der, yes. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minute% of Dublin City Council Meeting June 15. 2009 Held Mayor Ctunnici-Zuer r called the Monday, ne 15, 2009 Reguar ling of Dubl,n City Courtc to orde 17 p.m, at the D Municipal Binding. Present were Ma Ctunnici- Zuercher, Mayor Boring, Ms y, Mr. Reiner and Mr Leek idler. Mr an and Mr G absent (excused Staff members sent were: Mr. F , Mr. Smith, Ms. Gri , Mr. McDaniel, Chief Ep Ms. Crandall, Mr. H , Mr. Hammersmith, Harding, Ms. Puskarcik, Hoyle, Mr. Thurman, . Gundemtan, Ms. s, Ms Ott, Ms. Worstal!, Ms. Vroom. PLEDG F ALLEGIANCE Mr. R ' r led the P edge of lance. OVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting une 1, 2009 Leddider moved ap at of the minutes of June 1, 2009 Regid ouno eating. s. Salay seconded motion VgW on the rning ' a. Salay, yes; Mr. L , ider, yes; Mr. Reim s; Vice May Boring, yes; Mayor Innid- Zuercher, yes CITIZEN COMMATS Wa aca Maureff745" Dubin RQW stWd that he was reaenti ade aware of something, u r.;n has cursed him to nk that the Kinds fi was a case of mast misunders He teamed fr r Kindra that in the nctl meeting of May 2002, n the Bishop's C ng final plat schedul on that agenda, Mr. Kinds not aware th s item been scheduled. Mr indra asked Mr. Cis f the it uld be removed fr e agenda, because a were some remain t •esolved related to ntenanoe and vehi eeds Mr. Kendra n 'sled to Mr iarodu that he could t'n good oonsoence n off on the plat for e s. Mr. Ciarochl refu to request that Co reschedule the item ring the di ssion with Council ut this item, Mr. Kin nfortunately appear bordinate. He was uatiy very trortoerned t the Issues were not ly dressed. Mr. Mau oted that these fads re not known. Mr. K' Vs ouvatt for hiss ments in 2002 were ound. He suggested t Council cons der Mr. Kinds' osltion in th s and o some gesture of m mitt' to Mr K ndra. AGENDA M CATION Mayor Chinn' ' uercher reque/13 n to modify t/aa to consider Or d nance 9 prior to Ordin oe Mayor oring moved to mnda accordiMs. Salay nded the motioV e on Ms. Salayckt der yes; Boring. yes; ayor Chinn uercher. yes Mr. Re LEGISLATION SECOND &EADIN (PUBLIC NEARING — ORDINANCES Ordinance 27.09 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Pre - Annexation Agreement Describing the Intentions of the Parties to Annex Certain Real Property Owned by Celtic Capital LLC, Located in Jerome Township, Union County. Mr Foegler stated that a report was provided at the previous Council meeting Staff is avai able to answer Council's questions. V ce Mayor Boring nquired if this area s deve oped as residential is the ultimate goal to ^ave hose res dents enjoy the same leve of services as other City residents? Mr Foegler stated that is aired. VQk Qr the Q; d# ante Vice Mayor Boring. yes. Mayor Ctunnia Zuercher, yes, Ms. So ey yes, Mr Lecklider, yes: Mr Reiner yes. 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning / Preliminary Developmt�nt Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland r roy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minute of Dublin City Council Meet rr June 1. 2009 Page 4 Held _ _ _ _ _ _ ,ca Mr. Foegler noted trigo staff concurs on those&0sues, but it is not pos4e to address the issues by 'm g cord dons on lh s r Wing. 't would be .e howev er. to state that the ' need to be studied art of the conditional process moving forward. Mr. Ledo +:der fait that it is possible t language m/nbe added to the conditional - porton of the str ' ring districts ts tie desire to high quali rchltedure coord na with existing builmpatible with t area. ould support pr with stairs recomkeeping that particu statement in mind. oo, would prefer to endment dr d and sidered by P8Z as qrr y as possible. Mr einer referred to the 's belief that approxtrr r s the site, In view of . Adkins respond solutions to stuff th a #r parlung spaces the ely 400 square feet o ,odpiain slues Invoiv it is possible. It woy ing spaces. /♦ scant s willing to relooRe. Is it ridng could be mov isewher T be necessary to er creative Vice Mayor Borin veil app/ol-er, ice 24-09. Mr. Gerber s the moti V O Ms. Sr. Ref ^er, yes; Mayor innlci- Zuercher, yes; Vice Ma Going, Y es; es, Mr. Gerber. y r. LecW'der, yes. Mr. Gerber d to direct stode amendmen stablishing a condit use revl rocess for instituti Le er econded the m Vote Mr. Keen Leck'tder, y r. Gerber, yes; Ms. lay, yes; W. Reiner, yes; Vice MatLr Boring, yes; Mayor CrnMa- Zuercher, yes. INTRODUCTI WIRSTREAVINg— OBDINANCC§ Ordinance 27.09 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Pre - Annexation Agreement Describing the Intentions of the Parties to Annex Certain Real Property Owned by Celtic Capital LLC, Located in Jerome Township, Union County. Mr. Keenan introduced the ordinance. Mr. Foegler stated that the annexation petition has been before Council for some period of time. There is a four -year history associated with the petition It has been subject to many special circumstances and Issues throughout the process, including some concerns related to un'form coverage on the right- of-way associated with Hyland - Croy Road. A second issues a recent interpretation in regard to fire and life safety levies in Jerome Township 'or the property, which sign ficandy complicate the reparations disc u on. Staff has considered a variety of mechanisms to ensure that reparations are provided and collected , n a reasonably straightforward manner, and to minimize the risk for doub a taxation on future residents of this area At the same time there is a need to ma some level of flexibrity, given the uncertainty of some of the pending interpretations by Union County related to the recently discovered levy language ssues. Based on siafrs , eVew, the Administration and - he applicant believe the ordnance provides mechanisms for either of the scenarios which could resu't. JM Revnoads, Srmtti R Hg1e, Le esentative for the acDlican stated that what .s before Council tonight is the resu't of a long process of working with the landowners The applicant has been work ng with Jerome Township as well as with the Ciy. A reasonable compromise has been reached that will provide flexibility as the process moves forward Th s was, unfortunately, uncharted area in terns of the new annexation law, how regular versus expedited annexations are handled and how the reparations are hand ?ed There were no questions 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes-of Dublin City CwndI 13 Held J une 1. 2009 Page 5 There vaL be a second read nglpubltc hearing of Ord nance 27 -09 at the June 15 Council meet, , g Ordinance 28 Amending n 153.078 - 153.083 a Dublin Codified Inances (Zoning Code) regard Nonconforming Fe es (Case No. 09.031 ). Mr Gerber. uced the ordinance. Mr Gu n stated that this Code dment Is present response to direction � given by not at their May 18" 'ng Thus legislation mend Sections 153.0 - 083 roposed text changes rued in the redlined on of the ordinance provi Counci, packets. C Iniertt the a ent Is defined on 'tam is to permit fen at were erected prior effective date of nos 75- 4/19100) m be repl the same location a the same or lesser It as d on the effective date Ordinance 75-98. In ition, the replacement shall f the same materials a existing fence or o materials permitted 53.079, t as provided In §1 80(C) A Certificate of ing Plan Approval be ulred This is a first of the ° °agislation, the Code requires ral of the proposed amendment he Planning and Zon for atfon and recrimmAndation to ndl. Mr. Gerber n that the proposed a amendment be used for a Commissbn h g as soon as possibl nd that a recamme on be forwarded for Council's June `" Council meeting Mr. Foegler ed that Mr. La ngw as indicated that, d on Council's discussion r ard*ng the urgency of matter, thus item be scheduled for t June 11 P ring Commission a In reg o the last /thendnued h' ference to fence m als, Vice Boring find that believes C edfied that the revi anguago should not ft a prev° s materials, ead, 'as specified by ode.' This would a the Pity of permittntinued use of drain fencing material. underman staaintenance of an rig chain link fence always n permitted, and nce of an ex(stin ce would continue permitted th this Code ameowever, if a owner changes o e fencing material for an extst it must be with cun�tt Code r irements_ The City's Code does no han 'Ink fen in a residential area. Mr. Keenan ask wrought Iron is a fitted fence material Mr. Gunderrnan sponded that the p tied materials are if in Section 153.079 which begins page one. Section 1 .080 covers the use uiabons, which prow add'tional coons to Section 1 9. Mayor id- Zuercher request d arification of the *ce used In the pro ed amend is, wh ch state: 'In 'lion, the replacement ce "I be of the ma as flits wasting fence rnatenats perm in §153.079." This r tes that a 's an option of a chain I nit fence h a chain link fence. owever, the nt's that If the end nos Is being repl cannot be replaced h the p us materis f is ger permitt ed by cu t Code. Only for a it can the e materials be used Read er agreed a language does?' ' to that an existing link fence uld be replaced wi nother fence of the a materia' or with dill nt materials To ensure that a fu placement fence is tructed only of mat s permitted by cement Code, the uaoe wi I need to be vised. Ms. Saiay licence slat at, typically, when a rtain percentage of a cture is being remodeled . with current Fe :s required. Should thus + anguage COn a percents quirement� Otherwi , it would be possible replace an entire f in a p' fashion and conti use the existing m rals. Mr. Foeg' esponded that Is the ,hod that has typical een used to replace n - conf fences with the sam on- conforming mat — by replacing a at 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutos of Dubin City Council Meetirw W MUW- March Z 2009 Page q Held - _ _ _ _ _ . ? 'The the Umit' ThJoses above the shamrn the cloud have been d to create the development br There T m %._ C furth/oping . ,yes, Mr. Ledklider, s; Mr. Gerber, yes, 4mIn ng, yes: d- Zuerdter, yes; Mr. einer, yes: Mr. K , yes. nnia- ZueMr. Slane the f luck with the proj C ls forwa with tum. tated thtes the oanfl that City Council s placed in years of eal estate. he s never worked wi finer group of people. par ticularly l, Ms. Grig and Mr Smith He ressed his thanks to al.. KM9QW g UMRST READINQ - 28Q1NAN ES Ordinance 08 -09 Accepting the Annexation of 39.8 Acres, More or Less, In the Township of Jerome, Union County to the City of Dublin. (Petitioner. Celtic Capital, LLC) Mr. Lecldider'ntroduced the ordinance. Mr. Smith stated the app'icant requests the second readmg/public hearing of this ;eggs ation be postponed to the Apri 20 Council meeting. The property owner requires additional time to resolve an issue regarding reparations to Jerome Township. Mr. Gunderman stated that a substantial portion of this land consists of the right -af- way along Hyland -Croy Road. This characteristic makes it different than previous annexations. The vacant land of 30 acres is on the west side of the road. The remainder is the fu'l right -of -way of Hyland -Croy Road from just north of the Glacier Ridge roundabout to an area just south of Brand Road. This Regular annexation has required a substantial number of signatures to be obtained on the petition. Upon acceptance, the City will request an adjustment of the township boundaries to place this ,and in Wastungton Township. The annexation petition has been approved by Union County Commissioners and by the City of Columbus, pursuant to Dublin's utility agreements with Columbus. The area west of Hyland -Croy Road Iles within the negotiated expansion area in the water and sewer agreements with Columbus. Mr. Keenan inquired f the pre - annexation agreement contemplates that the area wi 1 receive fire and emergency sery ca?s from Washington Township. Mr. Smith confirmed that 't does. At the Union County annexation hearing, Jerome Township testified that they would not ob;ect to Washington Township saving this property. Mr. Keenan ' nquired how the reparations would "mpact the single- family homeowners along this roadway. Mr. Gunderman stated that the single- family homeowners signed the pebtion, but they wi , not be impacted by the reparations. The reparations wil' involve only the 30 -acre undeveloped site Mr. Keenan nqulred it the standard reparation payment would be based out the use of the land Mr Gunderman responded that il would be determined by the valuation of the property at is al time Mr. Keenan Inquired what the benefits are to Dubin of annex ng the right -of -way along Hyland -Croy. Mr. Hammersmith responded , the discussions were in tated with the previous Union County engineer, Steve Stolle. The City of Dublin has been responsible for all the improvements along the roadway, such as the construction of the Hyland -Croy roundabou at G acaer Ridge Metro Park and Glacier Ridge Boulevard. Dub *n is best suited to maintain that piece of roadway, which predominantly serves Dublin residents over and above residents of Union County. The City innll also then have jurisdiction over access 'o the roadway and will be better able , , o regulate t through future development 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development P an /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutea of Dublin City Cana Meeting H;: March 2. 2009 Page 5 ?0 Mr. Reiner inquired If Dub n has been maintowng it. Mr. Hammersmith responded that the City has been maintaining the roundabout under s verbal agreement with Union County. Dublin does the mowing and snow p owing, it °s an overlap area between Union County and the City of Dublin. Mr. Reiner summarized that the Dublin residents will then have a better quality of service with Dublin's maintenance of this area. Mr. Gerber moved to postpone the second read ngfpubfc hearing until the ApW 2CP Cound meeting. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Me on Mg motign Mr. Reuter, yes. Mr. Keenan, yeg�JIce Mayor Boring. yes, Mayor Chinnid- Zuercher, yes Mr. Ladd der, yes: Mr. G yes; Ms. Salay, yes O nance 09.09 the City ager to Enter Into r a vexation A ent g the to s of the Parties to rtain Real rty Located g=n n erome Toxrnshi nod by Kevin Mullins. Mr. Smith stated pursuant to City poi'cy to annex 'rig islands of townshlp, this is ast of three such fstagp within Jerome T ip to be annexed The and 's o y a single-family er Consistent the previous two township nslan as annexed to the an annexation fee ver is requested. There were uestions. There will second reading/pub. tiering of the ordina at the March 16 , Council rig Ordin 10.09 Ado and Enacting a S ement (S-25) to the a of Ordinances City biin. Ms, lay introduced the ance. Mr mith stated that s ekeeping legislation, occurs twice a I rporate recenty ed legislation into the s codified ordln Gerber moved to di rise with the second ding/public hearing. r. Keenan seconded a motion. Vote on ft —mot n ; Mayor Boring, yes; r. Keenan, yes; Mr. er, yes; Ms Salay, yes; Mr. Ge r, yes; Mr. Lecklider, ; Mayor Chinn -Zue r, yes. V the Mr. Ledctider, Yes r. Keenan. yes; Vice yor Boring yes. Ms. Salay, yes. . Reiner, yes; Mayor nid-Zuercher, yes; Gerber, yes. INTRO /PUBLIC HEARING C0^111VM^1k1 Resolution 9 Authorizin he City Manager to ter Into Memorandu of Understanding the Fra County Board of E tions for Use of Mu al Property In the Admin on of Public Elec s. Ms. ntroduced the ;egisl n. Ms. stated that this egWa n wi l forma ze an a rig arrangemen, with I- n County Board of Et ions to provide space" City fall ties to sery poi, rig v on tit Reso I,G yor Chinnid Zuerchm es; Mr. Keenan. yes; Reiner S; Vce Mayor Boring, s; Mr LeckW -Z , yes, Gerber. yes. Ms yes Resolution 06-09 Appointing a City resentative to the rd of Trustees of th entral Ohio Transit Authority Mr. Keenan Intr ad the resolution. M Mc Daniel that beginn -ng In the City of Dubl n W ave a seat on the COTA Board rustees. At Cmndl'a briery 2 0 meet'ng ndl requested that staff work w he Dubs n Chamber someone in the munity to represent the City In capacity The Dubtfn amber and staff mend that City Counr appoi ^t t W'� °ter, President an EO of Interstate Gas ppiy (IGS). Founded 1989. as now grown to a y with sales of o 1 billion, serving over 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd CORRESPONDENCE Holland, Brad From: Harris, Steven Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 2:19 PM To: Holland, Brad Subject: FW: EMH &T Celtic Crossing - - - -- Original Message---- - From: irheppner @aets.com fmailto:irhePPnerC @ aeo.comi Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:56 AM To: Harris, Steven Cc: tlhairston@aep.com Subject: EMH &T Celtic Crossing We have reviewed EMH &T's preliminary development plan for the Celtic Crossing project (utility and grading plan) that we recently submitted to us. We have no concerns with the proposed retention basin, Macha Court roadway or the 8" sanitary sewer line that encroach in AEP's 150' wide easement. For safety reasons, we ask that no tall growing tree species be panted within this easement area. This easement is for the existing Hayden - Hyatt 345 kV transmission line. If your plans change, please let us know. John Heppner American Electric Power Transmission Line Projects Engineering 700 Morrison Road Gahanna, Ohio 43230 614 -552 -1128 audinet 910 -1128 fax 614 - 552 -1818 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Cro Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd CORRESPONDENCE Metro Parks December 12, 2012 Metro Gregory Chillog Parks The Edge Group 1400 Goodale Blvd, Suite 100 Columbus, Ohio 43212 !! 1069 West Main St Re: Celtic Crossing Conceptual Plan i Westerville OH 43081 Tel: 614.891.0700 Mr. Chillog: TTY: 614.895.6240 Thank you for the Conceptual Landscape Plan dated October 31, 2012 for the Fax: 614.895.6208 j Celtic Crossing Development in the City of Dublin. As I mentioned to you, we are www.metmparks.net willing to consider the proposed trail connection as outlined in the plan. The proposed alignment would be built on park property and connect to the Ironweed Trail in Glacier Ridge Metro Park. Park Commissioners: ! Frances Beasley Greg S. Lashutka Si J. Jeffrey McNealey Since Director. John R. O'Meara St1 and Strategic Planning & Your Metro Parks: Land Acquisition Manager Battelle Darby Creek Blacklick Woods and d Golf Courses Blendon Woods I Chestnut Ridge Clear Creek Glacier Ridge Heritage Park ! and Trail Highbanks Inniswood Metro Gardens Pickerington Ponds i Prairie Oaks i Scioto Audubon Sharon Woods Slate Run Farm and Park i Three Creeks Walnut Woods 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd CORRESPONDENCE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS 7030 Coffman Road Dublin, Ohio 43017 -1068 (614) 764 -5913 (614) 761-5856 (Fax) December 12, 2012 Celtic Capital, LLC Attn: Kevin McCauley 565 Metro Place South, Suite 480 Dublin, OH 43107 Dear Kevin, Thank you for sending me the plans for your Hyland Croy Road Site. The school district is in agreement with a connection to our path along Hyland Croy Road. We understand that you will connect to our site at the northern comer of our property; Stavroff Interests will pay for the installation cost of the path; and will coordinate the time of installation with the school district. This path will be maintained in the same manner as other multi -use paths in Dublin. Thank you for working with us on this path. Sincerely, OVA 40-Z Annette Morud Director of Business Affairs AM/slp 12 -082 Z /PDP /PP Celtic Crossing Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan /Preliminary Plat Hyland Croy Rd