Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/29/1990 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~'Iinuios of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting Ct 4,-~~vN LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 Held January 29, 1990 19 Mayor Rozanski called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. Mr. Amorose moved to adjourn to Executive Session. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; rrr Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; and Mr. Strip, yes. Council began the regular meeting at 7:45 P.M. Mr. Amorose led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Campbell, Mrs. King, Ms. Maurer, Mayor Rozanski, and Mr. Strip. Mr. Sutphen was absent (excused). Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also present as were: Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Jones, Ms. Jordan, Mr. Mack, Mr. McDaniel and Mr. Willis. Mayor Rozanski announced that the Request for Approval of the Concept Plan for the Starkey/Coffman Tract would be moved up on the agenda. Request for Approval of Concept Plan - Starkey/Coffman Tract. Mr. Bowman, Planning Director, had the following comments: 1. The tract is a 48.7 acre tract currently zoned R, rural. 2. The applicant is seeking a Concept Approval to reclassify the site to a P.U.D., a Planned Unit Development District. 3. The proposal is for a residential development consisting of both multi family and single family dwelling units. 4. The overall density of the site is 3.16 units per acre divided into three phases. 5. The first phase is proposed to be the multi-family project of 112 unit . 6. The multi-family project includes a small community building and swimming pool. 7. Phase II is for 11 single family homes ranging in lot size from 80' to 100', all subdivided off of one public street that will go into the project. 8. Phase III includes 31 single family lots all with 100' of frontage and no build zones to save trees on this very heavily wooded site. 9. The Concept Plan proposes that 9.9 acres of parkland be dedicated (in total). 10. In conjunction with Phase I, the multi-family portion will be 6.5 acres of park land, mostly wooded land along the creek which also includes a 25 foot corridor from the main body of the park land along the stream out to Coffman Road behind the single family lots. 11. 1.1 acres would be dedicated as park space in Phase II and 2.3 acres as part of Phase III. 12. The applicant has agreed to insure that all phases of the parkland as well as those that were dedicated, or would be dedicated as part of Conventry Woods, would all be linked up, either through direct connection with bridges or some other type of pedestrian/bike connecti 13. Most of the land to be dedicated is within the 100 year flood plan. It is very unbuildable, but staff believes it to be a very desirable area due to the woods and the stream. 14. This plan is much improved over a plan that was heard about a year ago at the Planning Commission. lira. 15. The proposed land use, overall density of the plan is consistent with established Land patterns in the area. 16. The multi-family provides a good transitional use between the single family lots and the school administration building and athletic facility located immediately to the south. 17. Staff recommends non-binding approval of the Concept Plan. 18. The Planning Commission, at its meeting in January, voted 5 to 2 to recommend approval. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _~7iriuttS Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting C14'(1 ~!v LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 101A8 Held January 29, 1990 19 Page Two 19. There were several concerns addressed by the Planning Commission. ~ A. A concern about storm water on-site retention stemming from the development of the land and retention of storm water from off- site property. It was made very clear that the applicant had to provide a storm water master plan to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The issue of park land was discussed. There were questions about the timing as to when some of the park land would come in. The applicant identified that there would be an appropriate amount of park land dedicated in each phase based on the require- ments; there will be no compensation for the private amenities. C. There was some discussion about the 25' strip along the northern boundary of the site. Staff felt that that acquisition or additi n would be very valuable; that it would be an open space strip, primarily for pedestrians/bikeways. D. The Commission strongly advised the applicant to meet with surrou d- ing residents' associations' to advised them of the plan and to allow them to have an opportunity for input. Mr. Jim Houk of Bohm-NBBJ, land planning consultants on the project had the following comments: 1. Mr. Phil Fankhauser of Property Group One approached Bohm-NBBJ with regard to the development of a multi-family project, a condominium-typ project designed primarily for "empty nesters" (similar to Greystone Manor on Frantz Road). ~y„r 2. Staff recommended that the entire Starkey parcel be studied, not just the portion that Property Group One was interested in developing. 3. Sawm this parcel as a transitional piece of property from a land use standpoint, fitting in this land use with the surrounding high school, school administration building, the Shannon Park subdivision across the street (overall density of 3.29), on the other side of the high school Willow Grove (overall density of 7.2) and Earlington with an overall density of 3.28. 4. When the Starkey/Blackford piece, Coventry Woods, was originally zoned, there was a large portion of park dedicated or planned along the river. With this piece the thought was that it was important ~ to continue the development of the park on this side of the stream; that the stream corridor would be preserved to hopefully move up north and tiw into something which was done in Earlington Village. 5. Considered how the parcel to the north would be developed, establishin a transitional land use moving to the north. 6. The Starkeys are accessing their property through a long drive of which they have control between the high school and the school administration building. 7. The multi-family product will be a single story, empty nester, design four-plex of 112 units in four unit buildings, being wrapped around th school. 8. Creation of an entry feature which will be heavily landscaped with a ~ guardhouse. 9. To the north would be single family lots, and with movement into the woodland the lots would be 100'. 10. Have worked with staff and agreed to provide easements from this development across to the park as well as get around the Starkey s residence. 11. The first park donation will be 6.5 acres, giving no credit to private amenities. 12. There will be a 25' strip of land to provide an access point to Coffma Road, a pedestrian lane, along a nice woodland, matching what has already been donated as part of Coventry Woods. 13. The Starkeys desire to live in the residence; however, they have no desire to develop the single family until they are ready to leave. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~•liriuteS Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D4'!T:iw LEGAL BLAMK CO., FORM NO. 1014 Held January 29, 1990 19 ~ - Page Three 14. The balance of the park would be donated when the single family is developed. 15. There are 42 single family units proposed with 100' lots in the back and moving into the open field area would be 80' lots. 16. The overall density is 3.16 units/acre. Mr. Phil Fankhauser of Property Group One presented the following informati n relative to the project: 1. The units would be of a ranch style that would combine building materials that are very common to homes and quality architecture in the Dublin market today -.brick with limestone accents, wood siding, with important consideration being given to color details. 2. There would be special emphasis on landscaping. 3. A high percentage of the residents will be moving from a single family home into this particular lifestyle, with a number of quality features that people are accustomed to in single family living - a lot of privacy, the convenience and security of an attached garage and a lot of quality finished details on the interior. 4. The type of people typicall served would be - about 70% of the residents would be 55 years of age or older, please who have raised their families, etc. The other two markets served would be the young professional and the single-again population. 5. Have met with residents of the Hemingway Residents' Association and presented to them in detail the land plan, site planning details and the concepts of the type of lifestyle product to be offered. 6. A concern expressed by the residents was the impact of traffic. Staff had required early in the process that the applicant employ Irrr. outside consultants to do an in depth traffic study and it was the conclusion of the study that the traffic generated by this type of proposed population is comparable to traffic in volume as generated by single family residential at a density of two homes per acre. The study also confirmed that one of the benefits of this type of population would be that very few of the residents would be on the road at prime time drive periods of the day, especiall in the morning. 7. The residents also had a concern regarding dirt and mud on the roads during the construction phase. Mr. Fankhauser said that the residents were told that every effort would be made to control the mud and dirt on the roadways but that he did also tell them that his company maintains an open phone line, 'i 24 hours a day, if a problem should arise. 8. The residents were pleased that there would be a bikepath along the single family lots that would lead to the park or future park area. As part of the development plan with staff, Mr. Frankhauser, said that they had agreed that they would install a solid row of pine trees along the back of the single family homes that will back up to the bike path. One of the residents raised the question as to safety, not being able to see children on the bike path, and suggested that the developer consider more of a random planting of trees that might have ~ some open areas as well as areas where pine trees would help to interrupt the view and provide some of the privacy to the back of ~ the homes. ~ 9. Mr. Fankhauser said that the residents were comfrotable of the Development Plan and would be supportive. 10. Met with the people at the Dublin Schools and they indicated that they believed that this product would provide a reasonable transition use between the school property and potential future single family development to the north. They also commented regard the positive nature of this type of develop ment; attracting taxpayers without much additional burden on the school system (grown children). RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1~71nut~s Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DA'/TON LEGAL BL.A NK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 Held January 29, 1990 19 Page Four Mr. Amorose mentioned a concern he had expressed at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regarding access to emergency vehicles with the ~r. creation of such a long cul-de-sac. Mr. Houk said that the plan had been reviewed by Mr. John Sedlock and that he could support the project. Staff and Mr. Houk said that they would work closely with the Fire Department. Mrs. King complimented the applicant on the sensitivity as regards access to the park area. She also noted that she agreed that there should not be a solid wall of pine trees. Mrs. King also said that she was not comfortable with the concept of private streets, questioning what would be done in 10 to 15 years when the residents might be facing a substantial assessment to rebuild the ~ streets. Mr. Frankhauser said that the way to prepare for a long term major repair or replacement would be to have a reserve accrual every year and instead of having to do an assessment in 15 years that you assess a small dollar amount every month setting up that reserve. It should be understood, Mr. Frankhauser said, though, that condominium fees will be set by the residents themselves, but that they would recommend such a fee to be placed in that reserve. Mr. Amorose recommended approval of the Concept Plan with all recommenda- ~.r tions from staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote - Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Ordinance No. 06-90 - Annual Appropriations Ordinance for 1990. First Reading. Mrs. King introduced the Ordinance. Mrs. Metz reported that the Ordinance was based on the budget that was passed by Council at the last meeting, excluding the amount of voted bonds. She also noted that the Ordinance provided also the authority for expendi- tures as well. Mr. Strip had a concern regarding the $300,000 allocation for recycling, making recycling a line item. Mayor Rozanski recalled that he had discussed that issue at the previous Council meeting, noting that he agreed that the City needs to study recycling but whether $300,000 would be required is another question. He also recalled that Council had agreed that any expenditures in the recyc ing area would be approved by Council first. Mr. Strip questioned the likelihood of the City getting into any great expense involving recycling in 1990. Mrs. King said that $300,000 is more than will be needed in 1990 for a curbside recycling program. She noted that, in addition, the City faces the issue of what to do about the mandatory State Law for handling leaves and yard wastes. She said that the Tree and Landscape Advisory Commission is studying the issue and will have some recommendations in the spring. Mrs. King said that it could be possible to institute the recycling program as early as June of this year because the people of Dublin very much want this service. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~ZiriUte5 Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting L A~IOU LEGAL BI1\NK GO.. FORM NO. 10148 Held January 29, 1990 19 Page Five Mayor Rozanski said that he had heard little or no comments from citizens regarding recycling. Mayor Rozanski said that he did not object to leaving the $300,000 allocation in the appropriations as long as it is understood that there will not be an expenditure of these monies without a vote by Council. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the Council meeting on February 5, 1990. Ordinance No. 07-90 - Ordinance Authorizing a Contract for the Continued Employment of the City Manager. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Ordinance. Ms. Maurer moved to amend the Employment Contract as follows: Section 4. $67,500 not $67,400 Section 14., C. January 1, 1990. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Ms. Maurer moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes i.r Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on Ordinance - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Ordinance No. 08-90 - Ordinance Appointing Members to the Boards, Commissions and Committees of the city of Dublin. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Ordinance. The Clerk noted that the members of Council, this evening, had received a corrected copy of the Ordinance, noting the following changes: Mr. Grier Schaffer has declined the appointment to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Donald Barr, not Mr. Larry Bowen, was appointed to the Tree and Landscape Advisory Commission. Mayor Rozanski pointed out that in Section 1. as to appointments to the Planning and Zoning Commission that it should read that Mr. Ronald Geese and Mr. James Manus are appointed to four year terms and Mr. Charles Kranstuber is appointed to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Joel Campbell. a three year term. Mr. Campbell moved to amend the Ordinance to read that Ronald Geese and James Manus be appointed for terms of four years and that Charles Kranstuber be appointed to complete the unexpired term of Joel Campbell ~ which is a three year term. Yr. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Mr. sTrip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~,'I1riUtes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D~?"lON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 Held January 29, 1990 19 ~ - Page Six Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Mayor Rozanski read the following appointments: Ronald Geese and James Manus - Four year terms to Planning and Zoning Commission Judith Stillwell - Appointed to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a three year term. Tom Kellett and Lowell Mast - Re-appointed to the Architectural Review Board for three year terms. Gary Williams - Re-appointed to Personnel Board of Review for three years. Marge Rosher and Don Barr - Appointed to the Tree and Landscape Advisory Commission for three year terms. Resolution No. 03-90 - Resolution to Submit to Electors Question of Issuin Bonds for Purpose of Paying Costs of Improving the Vehicular Transporta- tion System. First Reading. I Mrs. King introduced the Resolution. Ms. Maurer noted that another dollar amount had been given for the Scioto Bridge crossing. She also noted that a high priority with regard to Council goals was the construction of sidewalks to link business areas with neighborhoods as ~ well as neighborhoods with each other. She suggested amending the amount allocated for sidewalks from $513,000 to $700,000 which would provide for approximately 10 miles of sidewalks. Ms. Maurer noted that the plan for 1990 was to, with sidewalks, connect the Old Dublin area to the two hotel districts on the west side of town (approximately two miles). She also suggested that the next two sidewalk projects would be to have a sidewalk to Sawmill Road to connect the businesses there and then from the western edge of town to the Perimeter Mall, costing in four years approximately two million dollars. It was also noted that a 1990 goal also would be to put a bikeway along Dublin Road. With regard to the increase in cost of the Scioto Bridge crossing, it was determined that the total dollars for this issue would be $34 million. Mrs. King, mentioning the wishes and priorities of Mr. Sutphen regarding bikeways, said that she was surprised to note that only one million dollars had been allocated. Mr. Hansley said that it was the intention of staff that bikeway linkages, the normal bikeway system requirements, be funded with inside millage as much and as quickly as the City can. Mr. Amorose asked if the City would be actively assessing property owners, as much as possible, for sidewalsk, mentioning Metro Center as an example. Mr. Hansley said that staff would probably recommend that Council establish a standard sidewalk replacement or construction policy, though not a policy that would require that every single sidewalk in every location be assessed, but that where there would be a special benefit to a commercial development that there might be a full or partial assessment. Mayor Rozanski said that he had real concerns with regard to 45 million, that being the high end for the City's allowable on debt issue. Ms. Maurer said that the 45 million allowable would be on the debt issue which would not actually be issuing the debt. She noted that the issuance would be over five years and if the City's valuation increases over that five years (as it has done over the past five) that that would give the City an extra margin. RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS i~7inutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting L4'+'.ON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 1014 Held January 29, 1990 19 Page Seven Mr. Strip said that he wanted to state again, and re-emphasize, that the approval of the bond issue package would require no new, additional taxes. Mr. Strip commented that although all were in favor of another bridge that that has not been discussed, studied, reviewed or planned, suggesting that perhaps the bridge crossing falls into the same category as the expansion of the municipal building and the community center complex. Mr. Campbell said that his concern was that the City would be taking on a "super laundry list" of projects, rather than three, four or five "big ticket items" that were first discussed. He further said that the debt would continue for twenty years and that he did not feel that this Council could foresee or ascertain the needs of Dublin for the next twenty years. Mr. Amorose commented that there was nothing new on the lists that had not been looked at for the last eight years. He also said that Council was only asking permission from the voters to spend the money when and if the price would be right, and that Council would vote on each project and expenditure as need would be determined. I Mr. Campbell said that he agreed that there were a few projects that should have been completed yesterday, but that there are a few projects that he thought should be thought through more thoroughly before committing the City to the maximum allowable. Ms. Maurer agreed with Mr. Amorose; that the City would not be authorizing spending, would not be tied to any specific projects; that the projects mentioned, completion of Muirfield Drive, Coffman Road extension, Yr.r widening of West Dublin-Granville Road, another bridge across the river, etc. are all projects which have been discussed and considered for a long time, noting that the goal is to get as many people out of town in as many directions as possible. Ms. Maurer said that she would prefer not to have the bridge as a separate issue; that it be a part of the entire package. Mr. Hansley recommended that Council not guarantee doing any specific project if the bond issue passes; that some flexibility must be maintained should substitution of a stated project be necessary; that the list of projects should be prioritized. Mrs. King pointed out that the City Council was trying to adress a backlog of projects that have been needed in the City for a long time, and that the City cannot continue to pay cash for such projects, and that the bonds give the City an opportunity to spread out costs over a period of years and that people who move into the City in three to five years will be benefiting from the improvements and park land acquisition, etc. voted by the bonds and will have a part in paying for them. Mrs. King said that she felt that the total amount could be reduced by reducing the roadway, bikeway elements somewhat; by reducing the five million for street lighting, by omitting the municipal building expansion and by omitting the community center. ~ Mrs. King said that in her conversations with voters that as long as there were no taxes involved that there was uniform approval of the concept. She also said that the voters wondered if the amount of money allocated for parkland acquisition was sufficient. Mrs. King further stated that she would like to see the entire package at 40 million. Mr. Strip said that before going to the voters that he would want more definitive, concrete information regarding the Scioto River crossing and the Bridge Street widening (land to be purchased, fate of buildings, e.g.). Mayor Rozanski said that he would prefer that the City pay for more projects and not carry over as much money from year to year. Mr. Strip pointed out that the City would be carrying over 10 million dollars from 1989. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS hi/11lllit~"S of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D4~l ~~N LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 1014 Held January 29 1990 19 Page Eight Mr. Amorose noted that a reason for the large carryover of money was the fact that there were several projects that did not get completed in 1989. ~.r There was a brief discussion regarding the amount of debt service, borrowi money, interest, etc., and then Mayor Rozanski asked if the City of Dublin was in the business of making money on investments or on providing services to the community. With regard to the swimming pool, Mayor Rozanski said that the City could have paid for the pool directly without borrowing the money on short term notes and paying interest. Mrs. King suggested perhaps a mid-year budget correction process could be initiated. Mr. Hansley noted that, for example, the Blazer Parkway project has not been completed but that the funds are encumbered. Mr. Strip pointed out that the 10 million dollar carryover does not include encumbered funds. ~ Mr. Amorose suggested the projects were an investment in the future; that 200 million dollar office buildings will not be constructed in Dublin if workers cannot get to and from the buildings; that in order to maintain the quality of life in Dublin that the traffic problems must be addressed. With regard to the bridge, Mr. Hansley said that he felt that staff had had a consensus of Council at the last meeting that the project was to ~ be added to the list. Mr. Stype, bond counsel, said that following passage of the three resolu- Y~.r tions by Council, that the resolutions would be delivered to the County Auditor for certification regarding millage. Following that certification, Council would need to pass three additional Resolutions to Proceed which will need to be filed with the Franklin County Board of Electsion by February 22, 1990. Mr. Bowman reported that staff had had a review last week on the proposed bridge crossing, and that the Land Use Committee of Council was also present. The study, he said, examined four alternative bridge crossing areas - a site immediately north of I-270, one in the vicinity of Brand Road, one in the vicinity north of Donegal Cliffs and a two lane addition to the O'Shaughnessy Bridge. He said that the study concluded that the alternative providing the most in moving traffic as well as having the greatest opportunity in engineer- ing feasibility, is the one located immediately north of I-270. The study identified 800 vehicles at peak hour, peak hour being defined as 7:00-8:00 a.m. and 5:00-6:00 p.m. Ms. Maurer also noted the assumption that there would be some change in behavior patters; e.g., car pooling, changing work hours, etc. Mr. Bowman noted that a bridge at the I-270 location would not appreciably change Dublin's desire to keep Dublin Road as a scenic collector. It was noted that the change from $5,500,000 to $6,500,000 was due to engineering costs and inspection fees. Mrs. King suggested that the study be released to everyone, it being important that the public have access to the study, and suggested also that in addition to simply making it available that staff is very pro- active and reaching out and making sure that anyone who could conceivably be touched by any one of the four alternatives is provided a copy by the City. She also wanted it made clear that a decision had not been made as to the placement/location of the proposed bridge. Mayor Rozanski noted that the costs for an eastern extension to the bridge or extension of the road eastward were not in the bridge package or in the list of five year capital improvements. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS iVIinutcs Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D4fl ~i~ LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 1014 Held Tan ,ary 29 1990 19 Page Nine I~ Mr. Amorose commented that the City will have some participatory shared costs with developers as that ground is developed. .w He noted that with the bridge in place that the City can ask the developer to put the road in; if there is no bridge the developer can hardly be asked to put in a road. Mr. Bowman said that the likelihood of getting monies from either the Federal, State or any other government agency would be at a minimum. Mr. Bowman said that, at a reasonable estimate, the project would take five years. Mr. Campbell said that he could be convinced, and was, to vote the authority to borrow the ceiling that he could "live with that" because although there were three or four specific projects that he felt should be started as soon as possible, he said that he would need to be convinced about doing several others. Ms. Maurer pointed out that any one of the other alternative bridges would cost more than the 6.5 million. I Mr. Hansley recommended another change regarding street lighting to allow for flexibility on the proposed street lighting improvements that will be done in connection with road improvements. ~ Ms. Maurer moved to increase the amount of money to 34 million and to strik the words "in connection with those improvements" from the title of the Resolution or anywhere else those same words might appear in the Resolution Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Yn.~ Mrs. King questioned whether the 5 million for street lighting was really needed, noting that she was trying to reduce the overall cost, although realizing that all amounts will be subject to later negotiations. She did note, however, that by making these purchases through bonds that the City will have freed up enough other funds to handle the additional ~ sidewalks, bikeways. Mr. Hansley said that the City would be proposing that whenever the City does a major road improvement (Tuller Road, e.g.) that the City would work in conjunction with the electric company to bury the overhead lines. Vote on the amendment - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Mr. Strip moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Mr. Strip recommended that a precedent not be set; that staff present their reports and recommendations, not on the evening of a vote, but give members of Council sufficient time to study reports and review same before being expected to spend large sums of money on projects. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Resolution No. 04-90 - Resolution to Submit to Electors Question of Issuing Bonds for Purpose of Paying Costs of Acquiring Real Estate for Parks and Recreational Purposes. First Reading. Mrs. King introduced the Resolution. Mrs. King moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS iVIlnuteS Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting OA"fON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 1014 Held-_ST~nuary 29. 1990 19 Page Ten Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. u.. Resolution No. 05-90 - Resolution to Submit to Electors Question of Issuing Bonds for Purpose of Paying Costs of Providing Additional Facilitie at Coffman Park Municipal Complex.. First Reading. Mrs. King introduced the Resolution. Ms. Maurer moved to amend the Resolution by omitting the words "improving, enlarging, renovating, remodeling, furnishing and equipping the existing municipal building" following the words "police facility" and inserting the word "therefore" after "acquiring real estate and interests in real estate", limiting the purpose of the bonds to land acquisition and construction of a police facility. It was noted that an additional one million dollars was allocated in the first Resolution for land acquisition under the Coffman/Brand roadway extension. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on motion to amend - Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Mr. Amorose moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; llr.r Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Resolution No. 06-90 - Resolution Establishing a Time Period for the Post Road Community REinvestment Area. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the Resolution. Mr. Hansley said that staff was still awaiting further information and suggested that Council treat the Resolution as a First Reading. There will be a second reading of the Resolution at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. Comments from Staff Ms. Jordan 1. Mentioned the memorandum in Council packets regarding the proposed regional ice rink and requested direction from Council. Mayor Rozanski expressed reluctance to spend additional money on the project until Council had additional information on how the facility would be shared by the four communities involved. y,r,,, Ms. Jordan said that Mayor Rozanski had expressed a concern previously expressed by each of the communities involved. She also said that committees have been organized, each community being responsible for studying one of the four issues identified - how it will be operated, site development, financing, program development. Ms. Jordan reported that the additional $6,250 for engineering had been approved by two communities and that Upper Arlington does not anticipate any problem. Ms. Jordan said that she would prepare a packet of materials with all of the information on the project to date for each Council member prior to the next meeting. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1~/linuto5 of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting 04-r ~:J ^1 LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 1 148 Held January 29, 1990 19 Page Eleven Mr. Strip moved to grant the request of the Dublin Historical Society for permission to close off South High Street from 7:00 P.M. to 1:00 A.M. on r... Friday, June 29, 1990 for the showing of the movie "1776". Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Mr. Bowman referred Council members to the draft plan of the southwest area and asked them to study same prior to the next meeting. Council Roundtable Discussion ~ Mr. Campbell 1. Said that he was pleased with the draft schedule for Council prepared y Ms. Maurer and Mrs. King for the year 1990. Mayor Rozanski requested that discussion of same be placed on the next Council meeting agenda. 2. Suggested that "Comments from Citizens" be placed on the agenda at the beginning of the meeting for those citizens wishing to express concerns or ask questions regarding items not listed on the agenda, limiting the agenda item to perhaps 10 to 15 minutes. It was noted that citizens could still have the opportunity to comment later on in the meeting also. Mrs. King r... 1. Said that there continues to be a problem with street lighting outages lasting for inordinate periods of time, along Muirfield Drive. She suggested that Council might want to replace the electric company as the company that services the street lights in Dublin. Mr. Hansley said that that would only be possible if the City would buy the system, purchasing the street lighting circuit. Mrs. King suggested calling the electric company each morning to complain about outages until the lights are repaired. Mayor Rozanski suggested having the electric company again appear before Council to explain why they have not lived up to their commitment. 2. Mrs. King reported that she continues to receive complaints regarding cable service and suggested that the City tell Warner Cable that they are not providing an adequate level of service. Mr. Hansley said that letters of complaint kept on file carried more weight than telephone calls and suggested that perhaps letters to councils of surrounding communities be sent to try to arrange a joint meeting to discuss the problem. He noted that he had learned that it is difficult to "throw out" a r'~ cable franchise from a community. j~ Mr. Amorose 1. Congratulated all who participated in the very successful D.A.R.E. program and for the positive press coverage that had been received. Mr. Hansley said that Dublin had been very fortunate in finding the perfect person to head the program, Officer Mike Epperson. Ms. Maurer 1. Congratulated the Police Department, mentioning Chief Ferrell and Sergeant Scharf, as well as the entire Police Department officers and staff who were so committed to the entire process. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS >?JIinut~s of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting C~4 :'1;)t-.; LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. iC148 Held .Tanuary 2A, 199n 19 Page Twelve 2. Mentioned the copy of the report she had received, "Suburban Mobility Initiatives" and said that she would have copes for all members of Counc i 1. 3. Reported arrangements are being made to have dinner with the members of the Columbus City Council and Mayor Rinehart on Wednesday, February 21, 1990 at Stouffer's Dublin Hotel and with the School Board on March 7, 1990. There will be a regular Council meeting on February 5, 1990. There will be a special Council meeting on February 12, 1990 to consider the Resolutions to Proceed with the voted bond issues. February 19, 1990 will be a regularly scheduled Council meeting. Mayor Rozanski adjourned the meeting at 10:29 P.M. or - Presiding icer ~rn Clerk of Counc~~- `r.r