Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Minutes 11-14-2011RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes f Dublin City Co uncil Meeting November 14, 2011 Mayor Lecklider called the Monday, November 14, 2011 Regular Meeting of Dublin City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. at the Dublin Municipal Building. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present were Mayor Lecklider, Vice Mayor Salay, Mrs. Boring, Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, Mr. Gerber, Mr. Keenan and Mr. Reiner. Staff present were Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. McDaniel, Ms. Mumma, Chief von Eckartsberg, Mr. Harding, Mr. Hammersmith, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Burns, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Earman, Ms. Puskarcik, Ms. LeRoy, Ms. Ott, Ms. Colley, Ms. Martin, Ms. Gilger, Mr. Clarey, and Mr. Gracia. Mayor Lecklider offered congratulations to his colleagues for their successful re- election to Council last week. PROCLAMATIONS /SPECIAL RECOGNITION Mayor Lecklider noted that both the Girls and Boys Golf Teams of Dublin Jerome High School won the Division I State Championships in late October. He presented a proclamation to the members of the Dublin Jerome High School Girls Golf Team and their coach. The team members include senior captain loon Hee Shim; juniors Jenna DiPaolo and Sierra Filson; sophomore Lexi Toth; and freshmen Maite Erana and Sybil Robinson. The team is coached by Head Coach C. D. Butcher and Assistant Coach Graham Rouse. Mayor Lecklider presented a proclamation to the members of the Dublin Jerome High School Boys Golf Team and their coach. The team members include Chad Merzbacher, Mert Salamet, Michael Harris, Brady Bohl, Chad Howard, and J.D. Fletcher. The team is coached by Head Coach Craig Zesiger and Assistant Coaches Kevin Grabeman and Ben Wenger Council congratulated both teams on again winning the Division I State Championship! CITIZEN COMMENTS Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road stated that he read recently of shamrock commendations given for academic performance to Karrer Middle School students. If there had not been an Irish immigrant in the early 1800s who became homesick and named this area "Dublin," the commendations would likely have a different name. He asked how streets in the City are named. Is there any kind of legislative or other procedure for naming of streets? Ms. Grigsby responded that street names are based upon information filed by developers at the time of rezoning and for the preliminary and final development plan. Once the streets are platted and the plat is accepted and recorded, the street name is official. When the proposed names are submitted to the City, they are reviewed by Engineering for appropriateness as well as to ensure there are no conflicting names for previously assigned street names. Mr. Maurer stated that developers then have a significant role in naming streets, based on this information. He brings this up due to his concern with the Irish overlay in the City. He has much admiration for the Irish history and literature. However, Dublin seems to be creating a kind of "fake Irish" in the City. At the time Dublin, Ohio officially became a City, the Mayor of Dublin, Ohio visited the Lord Mayor of Dublin, Ireland. The following year, the Lord Mayor of Dublin, Ireland visited Dublin, Ohio. After that, the visits never occurred again. He believes that the reason is that no deep relationships ever developed between the two cities. In his role with the Dublin Irish Celebration Committee, founders of the Dublin Irish Festival, he arranged for Irish literary figures or politicians to participate in the Celebration. He recalls that years ago, he went to the airport to pick up a guest on a hot day in heavy traffic, and she was furious with him for persuading her to speak at the Festival. (As the time had elapsed for speaking, he offered to continue his comments at the next meeting.) -u RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting November 14, 2011 Page 2 Tom Hedge, H.R. Butler, 63 Corbins Mill Drive stated that the Economic Development staff suggested he address Council regarding the status and future plans for the recently condemned hotel property, which is adjacent to their property. He has heard that the buyer of the hotel will determine what the future of this property will be, and he has also heard that there may be some interest by the City of Dublin in acquiring the hotel property. If there is no interest, he would like to know that. Their company is outgrowing their present location and will be preparing the property for sale. If there are plans for the hotel property and if there is any interest by the City in purchasing their property as well, he would not want to spend monies on preparing their property for sale. He would instead offer it to the City for purchase. Mr. Smith responded that the hotel property has a lien placed on it by the Huntington National Bank. It is in receivership and the receiver is currently investigating the costs of remodeling the building, tearing it down, or selling it. They have engaged with Cushman & Associates of New York, and he expects this process will require some period of time, given the number of parties involved. The property has been secured and cleaned up to the extent possible, and the City is waiting to hear back from the attorney for the receiver regarding their next steps. Mr. Hedge asked if there is any interest on Dublin's part for acquiring that property. Mr. Smith responded he cannot speak to that. Ms. Grigsby added that in terms of potential acquisition, there have not been any discussions to date. Any land acquisition discussions would be held in executive session, in any case. Mr. Hedge thanked the City for cleaning up the property, which has improved the appearance. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Lecklider noted that nine items are proposed for action on the consent agenda and asked whether any Council Member requests removal for further consideration under the Regular agenda. Hearing none, Mayor Lecklider moved approval of the action for the nine items as proposed on the consent agenda. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. 1. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes of October 24, 2011 Council Meeting 2. Ordinance 60 -11 (Introduction/ First Reading) Adopting the Annual Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2012. (Finance Committee of the Whole operating budget workshops on November 16 and November 21; second reading /public hearing December 12 Council meeting) 3. Ordinance 61 -11 (Introduction/ First Reading) Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Necessary Conveyance Documentation for the Acquisition of a 0.183 Acres (with 0.143 Acres as Present Road Occupied), More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, and a 0.027 Acres, More or Less, Temporary Construction Easement from David H. Throndsen and Lori M. Throndsen. (Second reading /public hearing November 28 Council meeting) 4. Ordinance 62-11 (Introduction/ First Reading) Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Necessary Conveyance Documentation for the Acquisition of a 0.023 Acres, More or Less, Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement, and a 0.055 Acres, More or Less, Temporary Construction Easement from Lester R. Eyre and Shirley A. Eyre. (Second reading /public hearing November 28 Council meeting) RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minute Dublin City Council Meeting November 14, 2011 Page 3 Ordinance 63-11 (Introduction/ First Reading) Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Necessary Conveyance Documentation for the Acquisition of a 0.291 Acres (with 0.162 Acres as Present Road Occupied), More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, a 0.249 Acres (with 0.138 Acres as Present Road Occupied), More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, a 0.162 Acres, More or Less, Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement, a 0.224 Acres, More or Less, Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement, and a 0.162 Acres, More or Less, Temporary Construction Easement from Suzanne B. Feasel, Trustee. (Second reading /public hearing November 28 Council meeting) 6. Ordinance 64-11 (Introduction/ First Reading) Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Necessary Conveyance Documentation for the Acquisition of a 0.155 Acres (with 0.086 Acres as Present Road Occupied), More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, a 0.086 Acres, More or Less, Permanent Utility and Drainage Easement, and a 0.022 Acres, More or Less, Temporary Construction Easement from Suzanne B. Feasel. (Second reading /public hearing November 28 Council meeting) 7. Resolution 55-11 (Introduction /Vote) Accepting the Lowest /Best Bid for the Dublin Community Pool North Spray Park Project. 8. Resolution 56-11 (Introduction/Vote) Accepting the Lowest /Best Bid for the COIC Sanitary Sewer Extension Phase 2 Project. 9. Resolution 57-11 (Introduction/Vote) Accepting the Lowest /Best Bid for Enhanced Road Salt. Mayor Lecklider suggested that the agenda regarding the EcoSummit 2012 at this point. There was no objection from Council. be modified to hear Mr. Jourdan's presentation SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS EcoSummit 2012 Ecological Sustainability — Columbus, Ohio - Chester Jourdan, Executive Director of Mid Ohio Regional Planning Commission Mr. Jourdan addressed Council regarding the summit, which takes place in Columbus in 2012. This summit is held every four years around the world. It brings together the best and brightest minds from the public and private sector and academia to address the ecological sustainability challenges facing the world. There will be 2,500 participants from 75 countries in Columbus for a week, and the region will be the epicenter for this conversation. He noted that a corporate CEO roundtable and a Mayors' forum are planned. There will be a large contingent from China and from India as well as participants from many other nations. This will be a great event, and MORK has been discussing the opportunity and legacy this presents for this region. Cardinal Health has resources in the Dominican Republic, and there will be an opportunity to meet with the president of that nation, as well as those from other nations with whom our community has interests. This is the first time this event has been held in the U.S.A., and it is important not to overlook this unique opportunity for future business for the region. MOMRPC would like to see Dublin be a sponsoring host for one of the roundtables. There are great challenges facing the world, and there is no reason the Columbus region cannot be at the forefront addressing those challenges. They began planning discussions for this event two years ago. He thanked Council Member Chinnici - Zuercher and City staff for the support and assistance they have provided. Dublin's continuing support, including financial, is important to make this event what it should be. Mayor Lecklider invited Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, as Council's liaison to MORK, to comment. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council MeetinL November 14, 2011 Page 4 Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher stated that both she and the City Manager serve on the MORPC Board. It is partially due to the efforts of Mr. Jourdan and MORPC that Columbus was selected as the host city for the event in 2012. It is a terrific opportunity to move this region forward rapidly in various areas, both with local policies and global policies. It would be great if Dublin could be involved in the CEO roundtable because of the companies that exist within the City. Perhaps a discussion could occur with some of the local companies concerning financial assistance for a potential City sponsorship of this. Mr. Reiner inquired about the location of the summit events. Mr. Jourdan responded that it would occur in various locations, beginning with an opening reception at the Ohio Union. During the week, the participants will visit many sites throughout the central Ohio region. Mr. Keenan inquired about Grove City's level of sponsorship. Mr. Jourdan responded that Grove City is sponsoring at a $50,000 level. Mrs. Boring requested that staff look into the potential opportunities for Dublin to participate in sponsorship. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff has been working with MORPC on the EcoSummit, and funding allocation has been included for the 2012 operating budget discussion. Mr. Jourdan was asked to present the high points on the EcoSummit to Council, preceding that budget workshop. Dublin has a good opportunity to become a sponsor and to partner with others to sponsor the CEO Forum. Additional discussion can occur at the budget workshop on Wednesday. Mayor Lecklider thanked Mr. Jourdan for his presentation. LEGISLATION SECOND READING /PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 58 -11 Authorizing the Provision of Certain Incentives to Sociusl, LLC to Induce It to Retain an Office and Associated Operations and Workforce within the City, and Authorizing the Execution of an Economic Development Agreement. Mr. Clarey recapped the first reading information. The agreement is a four -year, ten percent performance incentive to Sociusl, LLC in consideration for their retaining 23 jobs and creating an additional 13 jobs in Dublin by the end of 2016. The company's success has necessitated a move to a larger facility in Dublin, and therefore the agreement is also tied to a five -year lease, with a two -year bonus for a potential three -year lease extension. The company's Human Resource Manager is present tonight to provide additional details. Rachel Bellis Sociusl LLC, Human Resources Manager stated that the company is a consulting firm focused largely on ERP and CRM software applications. Socius is headquartered on Post Road in Dublin, where they have 23 employees. They have offices of similar size in Cincinnati and Cleveland, and smaller offices in Kansas City and California, totaling 85 employees. They have experienced growth over the past three years, and project the addition of 13 employees during the next 5 -6 years in Dublin. In addition to the staff growth, they also have an aggressive acquisition strategy and anticipate significant growth for Socius. Mayor Lecklider stated that the growth is impressive. He understands that they have been located at the Dublin Entrepreneurial Center. Ms. Bellis responded that is correct. They have outgrown that space and plan to move to a location on Perimeter. Mayor Lecklider inquired about their experience at the DEC. Ms. Bellis responded that it was a good experience. They were welcomed and their growth was accommodated with flexibility in space, but they are now ready for a space that will better meet the needs of their organization. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council November 14, 2011 Page 5 Vote on the Ordinance Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes. INTRODUCTION/ FIRST READING — ORDINANCES Ordinance 59 -11 Rezoning Approximately Four Acres Located on the South Side of West Dublin - Granville Road at the Intersection with Shamrock Boulevard from PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Shamrock Crossing — Subarea B), to PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Shamrock Crossing — Subarea B [Revised]). (Case 11- 057Z/PDP/FDP) (Heartland of Dublin) Mr. Gerber introduced the ordinance. Ms. Martin stated that a request for approval of a rezoning /preliminary development plan for four acres located on the southeast corner of Shamrock Boulevard and West Dublin - Granville Road. It is a modification to Subarea B of the Shamrock Crossing planned unit development. The proposed site plan consists of a 65,000 square foot rehabilitation and skilled nursing facility. The building will be located on Dublin- Granville Road. In order to accommodate street - oriented architecture and pedestrian - friendly design, there are two retaining walls. There are two pre - defined access points, one directly across from Sharp Lane and another off of Stoneridge Lane, which does align with the proposed access point for Subarea B of the Sunrise Senior Living planned unit development. The site has 131 parking spaces located to the side and back of the building. A rezoning was needed to address an increase in density, as well as a change in architecture, reduction in parking, and modification to landscaping and tree preservation. In consideration of the proposed Bridge Street Code, staff worked closely with the applicant to ensure that their proposal closely met that Code in regard to street orientation, rear parking, public plaza space, building materials, architectural fenestrations, and urban landscape treatment. [She shared a PowerPoint presentation of the proposed elevations.] The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning on October 20, 2011 with five conditions. The applicant has incorporated those into the development text. Mrs. Boring inquired if there is the possibility of their name, Heartland, being confused with Heartland Bank. Chris Cline Blaugrund Herbert and Martin 300 W. Wilson Bridge Road. Worthington representative for the applicant stated that ManorCare Health Services has 450 facilities nationwide. Heartland is their trade name. They have another Heartland facility in central Ohio. Mr. Keenan stated that there were three iterations of the exterior elevation as this project moved throughout the process. How was this elevation selected? Ms. Martin responded that the first iteration, which was informally reviewed by the Planning Commission in January of this year, was more consistent with the existing development text in regard to the architectural style. Following that review, modifications were made in the plan allowing it to appear as a larger building, versus attempting to make it appear as individual buildings. In April, the plan was informally reviewed again by the Commission, after which the applicant met with staff to attempt to make the plan consistent with the proposed Bridge Street Corridor development text in regard to architectural fenestrations, finishes, transparency, and to incorporate some additional guidance provided by the Commission. This third iteration resulted. Mr. Gerber requested clarification of the seventh condition: "The approved stormwater facility and associated landscaping be completed on the adjacent Sunrise Senior Living site." Ms. Martin stated that as this site was developed, the stormwater management plan for this site was incorporated into the overall stormwater management plan to include the pond located at Sunrise Senior Living. Therefore, the stormwater has already been accounted for within that detention pond. The detention pond at Sunrise is only partially constructed, and the condition for approval ensures that it will be completed. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeti November 14, 2011 Page 6 Mayor Lecklider asked who would be completing the pond. Mr. Cline responded that the developer of this site is obligated to pay for a percentage of the cost to complete it, approximately 45 -50 %. Sunrise is expected to pay the remainder of the cost, but regardless, it will be completed. Mr. Gerber asked if Sunrise has been contacted regarding this. Mr. Cline responded that they are in communication with Sunrise. This is a joint venture between Metropolitan Life and Sunrise. Regardless of the schedule of the Sunrise project, this detention facility will be completed and landscaped in accordance with the approved plans. Mr. Gerber asked if this condition was Planning & Zoning Commission driven or staff driven. Ms. Martin responded that it was staff driven. There needs to be a level of assurance that the pond has been constructed according to what was approved as part of the overall stormwater management plan approval. This is necessary to obtain building permits. Mayor Lecklider invited the applicant to make a presentation. Mr. Cline stated that in terms of the architecture, they encountered some difficulties in view of the changes taking place in the Bridge Street Corridor area. Once they were able to review the draft Code, it helped them to understand the expectations of the City. The architect has done a good job with the new architecture. Heartland has 450 facilities nationwide. This facility will be medically heavy, and will support the hospitals in Dublin and the area. This facility will house a lot of rehabilitation patients and will therefore generate a payroll of 140 full -time equivalent employees, estimated at $7 million plus per year, with a $16 million investment overall in the facility. This project takes the City a step forward in implementing the expectations of the Bridge Street Corridor. If this was brought in under the Bridge Street Code, it would be fully approvable administratively, except for a conditional use required. Mayor Lecklider asked him to share his experience in adapting to the Bridge Street Code. Mr. Cline responded that at the outset, it was intimidating and quite different. They had to amend the plat to bring the buildings up close to the road. The Bridge Street Code does not provide development standards based upon the use, but rather, upon the building type. The information is all available, and they became comfortable with it fairly quickly. Mrs. Boring commented that these elevations are much improved, and the project has a greater presence on the road than what was previously proposed. She is very pleased with the changes made. Mr. Cline responded that the building is at a high elevation, and there is 11 feet of grade change from the east side to the west side. He believes it will set the right tone for what the City is trying to achieve along SR 161. Mayor Lecklider asked about the timing of groundbreaking, if this is approved. Mr. Cline responded that staff has requested a pre - submittal meeting on November 29, assuming the rezoning is approved on November 28. They are ready to move forward after approval of the rezoning. Mr. Keenan stated that, based on personal experience, it is not easy to identify locations for neurological rehabilitation. There is a need for such facilities in the Dublin area. There will be a second reading /public hearing at the November 28 Council meeting. INTRODUCTION /PUBLIC HEARING /VOTE — RESOLUTIONS Resolution 58 -11 Authorizing the Renewal of an Agreement with DubLink Development Company LLC that Served to Authorize DubLink Development Company LLC to Manage and Operate a Conduit System within the City of Dublin. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting November 14, 2011 Page 7 Mr. McDaniel stated that the City began the DubLink project by entering into an agreement with a subsidiary of the Fishel Company called DubUnk Development Company LLC. This agreement was effective December 14, 1998 and allowed the Dublin Development Company to build and operate the conduit system within Dublin right -of -way. The term of the agreement was for 25 years, and Dublin Development Company has an option to renew for an additional 25 years. Dublin Development Company LLC would like to execute its option of a 25 -year extension at this time and have Council acknowledge that renewal. Fishel would like an acknowledgment by Council that the agreement can be interpreted to require that the notice of renewal occur now instead of one year before the expiration. As more companies come forward desiring to lease conduit and set up 15 -year agreements, it is now encroaching into that extension period. Therefore, staff recommends that Council acknowledge and allow that 25 -year option to be extended at this point. Mr. Reiner asked about the status of the capacity of DubLink. Mr. McDaniel responded that the conduit system itself is about 50 percent leased. This is the bank of conduit or pipes — not the fiber itself. Mr. Keenan asked about the useful life of the fibers. Mr. McDaniel responded that the life of fiber optics is likely 15 -20 years, but this agreement relates to the conduit bank of PVC pipe — it has a 50 year plus life. Mr. Keenan asked if they must pull more fiber through as it wears. Mr. McDaniel responded that it can be replaced when performance indicates the need. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes. OTHER • Presentation of Report of Battelle Industry Cluster Study Mr. McDaniel stated that the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice has produced this report, and they will present a brief overview tonight. In the 2011 budget, Council authorized the engagement of Battelle Technology Partnership Practice for the purpose of conducting an industry cluster analysis — an analysis of the existing economic situation in Dublin, and proposing strategies for future competitiveness. The purpose of tonights presentation is to provide a broad overview of the outcome of the study at this point — not the final results. Staff is seeking feedback from Council and any further guidance prior to finalizing the report for submittal to Council. He introduced Simon Tripp, Senior Director of Battelle Technology Partnership Practice, a subsidiary of Battelle and Ron Gaydos, a Senior Economic and Policy Consultant with the Battelle Technology Partnership Practice. Mr. Tripp noted that they have been working on this project in Dublin for a year. When working around the country, they often work with local economies distressed with many challenges. They also work with communities with great strengths that are building upon those strengths. Dublin is a community doing extremely well. This is a study about how to go from "good" to "great." Clearly, global competition is an important factor, the real estate product companies demand is changing, the workforce demand, and living and working environments that young people who have technology skills is changing. Dublin has demonstrated great foresight in engaging in this project — looking toward the future and what the community can be in terms of economic development. They plan to provide a summary of findings, looking at Dublin in the context of the Greater Columbus region. They will review the cluster analysis performed, the SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis in regard to economic development in Dublin, and then outline the strategies and recommendations resulting from the project. He noted that their process was fairly linear, beginning with an orientation with the economic development staff; reviewing existing studies, plans, data, ordinances, zoning, etc.; interviews with key stakeholders in the community; an in -depth cluster analysis; and focus groups with community members and industry representatives. Lastly, they moved into formulating strategies and action plans, based on that information. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meetin, November 14, 2011 Page 8 They have used a series of quantitative data, as specified in the full project report that will be provided when finalized. He acknowledged Colliers Penn for providing real estate data on current real estate in the community. In terms of deliverables, the project report includes details on the strategic site analysis, where they have reviewed available property in the community, the character of that property, and the suitability to modern economic development needs — with a particular emphasis on the Economic Advancement Zone and the Bridge Street Corridor. They view the Bridge Street Corridor as very important for the future of the community in light of modern economic development standards. They have outlined five specific strategies and associated actions with each. He stated the following: • Dublin has 0.8 of the Columbus Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) land area, yet Dublin has 2.4 percent of the Columbus MSA population. Dublin has 6.2 percent of the region's employment, and the Dublin output is 8.7 percent of the MSA. This indicates the importance of Dublin's contributions to the Columbus region. • In terms of unemployment for years 2007 through 2010, Dublin has significantly less unemployment than the Columbus MSA, the state, and the nation. • In terms of wages and salaries, Dublin's are exceeding national averages as well. In some specific clusters, Dublin's are lower — but this can be a recruitment advantage in economic development as well. • The leading clusters in terms of employment in the Columbus MSA are logistics, finance and insurance, medical and healthcare services, internet commerce and computer services, and residential healthcare. • Based on the "Greater Columbus Industry Clusters in the Recession" bubble graph, the region is doing well in the areas of business support services, internet commerce and computer services, and residential healthcare services. Up and coming are medical biosciences and healthcare services. Their work has focused on where Dublin's strengths lie within this economic model. • Dublin lines up well in the areas of business support services, internet commerce and computer services, medical biosciences and healthcare services, residential healthcare services, tourism, recreation and arts, and corporate headquarters. • Another analysis they do looks at location quotients and industry growth, and shift- share analysis to understand where Dublin's current strengths are and identify industries that may have some challenges moving forward and where retention efforts need to be targeted. The clear current strengths for Dublin are internet commerce and computer services, business support services, distribution and logistics, corporate headquarters, and creative design industries. • For emerging strengths, they identified medical biosciences, healthcare services, and residential healthcare services. Up and coming as well is research and development and engineering services. • These strengths drive the strategic actions that need to be taken in influencing the real estate product needed moving forward. • There is significant employment in these key clusters, so Dublin will be building from a base of strength. • In terms of strengths, Dublin's are geographic location with excellent highway access; forward- thinking and planning- oriented community and governance; capacity to invest; strong quality of life and community infrastructure which compliments the business environment; robust and diverse company mix; significant broadband infrastructure critical in IT and healthcare applications; substantial volume of land available for further development; and capacity to adapt to new challenges moving forward. • For weaknesses, Dublin's are an aging commercial building stock, particularly Class A office; almost exclusively auto - centered transportation; zoning that can exclude some emerging industries; image gap between being developer friendly and a "difficult" partner; economic development staff are generalists, but lack industry- specific expertise; in specific clusters; the communities outside of Dublin are now emulating what Dublin has done successfully, resulting in rising competition. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MeetillL Dublin C Counci November 14, 2011 Page 9 For opportunities, adaption of aging commercial building stock for emerging needs and diversity of use; attraction of businesses and talent with the Bridge Street Corridor live /work/play environment, offering higher density urban development attractive to the creative class; building on strengths to tie environment, healthy living, and social vitality to economic development; broadening company networks to find business opportunities; and digital operations with DubLink make a broader range of businesses compatible with Dublin. For threats, potential loss of Dublin companies to other central Ohio municipalities offering tax abatements; Dublin's success is tied to Central Ohio's regional economic growth; fuel price increases will increase demand for higher density, non- commute oriented environment; changing demographics will result in more home sellers than buyers; other communities in Columbus region are building competing live /work environments; aging building stock with a lack of diversity. Mr. Gaydos addressed strategic site analysis, as outlined in the draft report. He commented: • An architect in the new urbanism movement stated that "People don't want to live where they work — they want to work where they live." This is all about the merger of communities and the economy, having recreational and residential spaces together in the community — much like the vision of the Bridge Street Corridor. • Six criteria would be considered in selecting priority development sites: sufficient size of area to serve cluster business needs; sufficient existing or planned infrastructure; undesirable or obsolete uses for land that can feasibly be rezoned and adapted for development; an ability to integrate into adjacent successful development, fulfilling other planning goals, or supported by other community assets; advantageous position among competing communities; and for existing buildings, significant vacancy in otherwise suitable buildings and sites. • He reviewed a map of the study areas for the Central Ohio Innovation Corridor. Their land records are from the City's Planning division, and they are categorized by special planning areas. They are generally congruent. • The future uses map shows no significant conflicts with development priorities and planned uses. • He shared a chart comparing development features of Dublin with other competitor communities in Central Ohio and information regarding non - residential vacancy and square footage available in the various areas of Dublin. • He shared strategic site analysis for the Economic Advancement Zone as well as the Bridge Street Corridor. Mr. Tripp continued, presenting five key economic development strategies: 1. Undertake focused cluster -based marketing and business development specific to areas identified as key strengths and opportunities for growth. 2. Encourage development of start -up and entrepreneurial businesses, as home- grown businesses tend to stay in the community. 3. Ensure that Dublin development facilitates cluster innovation and sustainability practices. 4. Improve housing and transportation options for moderate pay -scale workforce, ensure that companies have access to this type of housing and transportation. 5. Evaluate policies, regulations and the real estate product as they pertain to business retention and expansion. He noted that the full project report will detail who should do this work, the estimated costs, and the timeline. He presented recommendations regarding each of the five strategies. Strategy 1: • Leverage regional and local cluster expertise through ad hoc advisory committees for target clusters similar to the Council Commissions, though not as permanent commissions. Together these ad hoc committees will informally comprise a "Dublin Innovation Council" and guide business practices and activities suited to that cluster. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of M Dublin City Council November 14, 2011 Page 10 • Form agreements and build relationships with Columbus 2020 and other regional bodies for their access to experts in cluster. • Develop direct marketing program relative to that specific industry sector to cultivate strategic relationships. • Perform a detailed gap analysis to determine what resident businesses are missing in their supply chains and service needs so gaps can be filled by local companies or in priority development projects. • Focus one staff member's activity on the coordination of cluster networking, ad hoc advisory boards, and other cluster- oriented activities. Strategy 2: • The City is doing this already with the DEC. Other suggestions are to create a Dublin Technology Investment Tax Credit to leverage the Ohio Technology Investment Tax Credit. • Create a Dublin Cluster Opportunity Revolving Loan Fund to target specific emerging opportunities. • Within the Dublin Innovation Council, create an Entrepreneurship and Risk Capital Commission. Early stage capital is extremely important for new business development and is a particular challenge in Ohio. • Develop the second start-up accelerator to enhance Dublin's live /work/play environments and so stimulate Dublin's Internet Commerce and Computer Services cluster. This would be best housed in the Bridge Street Corridor. Stategy 3: • Ensure full adoption of the Bridge Street Corridor Plan. It is certainly reflective of best practices throughout the country. • Focus initial development efforts on the BSC core area, as per the Site Analysis. This will build upon restaurants and businesses already existing in the core area. • Highlight the Scioto River in BSC development through direct access or view -shed features. • Ensure development of BSC that incorporates the features that appeal to the 25 -35 age demographic and technology companies. Recent data indicates over 70 percent of that age group want to live in an urban core environment — higher density, live /work environment, with a sense of place and nightlife activity. This opportunity exists with the Bridge Street Corridor. • Consider an "Economic Eco- system" approach to Dublin development practices to integrate the natural, architectural, economic and social environments to maximize efficiency, quality of life and economic impact. Strategy 4: • In talking with large employers in Dublin, they expressed concern with access to moderate income workers and being totally centered on auto transportation for workplace access. Linkages to surrounding communities in all directions via transportation systems is important — not just a hub and spoke into Columbus. • Having rental properties — not just owner - occupied properties -- available in the BSC will be important for the housing mix as well. • Ensure the continuity of walking and bicycle paths through high traffic areas. Dublin has done this well, and plays very well in the 21s` century. Strategy 5: • Formalize a method to assess company needs in anticipation of their timely resolution. Having two new economic development staff members is in line with this strategy. • Accelerating and anticipating Phase Two of project development early on, so that they know in advance what is required and in order that the permitting process will not delay them in adapting or expanding their space. • Formalize a method to maintain an inventory of Dublin commercial property for best knowledge of the Dublin product, particularly those that relate to the targeted clusters. • In the future, consider establishing a "Dublin Community Redevelopment Corporation or other entity tasked with facilitating the adaption of the underutilized and more problematic older buildings. Currently, there is approximately 1 million square feet of vacant office space -- largely in the category RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting November 14, 2011 Page 11 of older Class B and older Class A spaces. These may need some incentive in the future for redevelopment. Fully adopt Dublin's package of development process improvements to streamline development, and communicate that those changes are taking place to relevant audiences. He concluded by stating that Dublin is a superb community doing very well, even in tough economic times. Dublin has built a community that business likes, residents like, with a great school district. Moving forward, some of the real estate product will need to shift, but this has been identified with BSC type initiatives. It is important to understand where the industry strengths lie, what the needs of those industries are moving forward, and what the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats are in relation to that type of modern economic development. Mayor Lecklider asked Mr. McDaniel to identify the next steps in this process. Mr. McDaniel stated that the 100 -page report is in draft form, and it validates what Dublin has been doing from those working at a national and global level. He requested input from Council regarding the study, as well as other ideas. Staff will then provide a written final draft report for Council's review. He does not believe there is a need for a formal adoption of this report; he views this as a guide going forward. This has been a great learning process, and he appreciates Council's funding of the study with Battelle. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher commented that she appreciates this great additional information, and having experts validate some of Dublin's practices. She suggested Council consider using this as a foundation for the 2012 goal setting retreat. Although Economic Development staff have a vision for the future, she feels that Council does not have the larger economic development vision. These are great strategies and recommendations — having capital available for start-ups in this region and the appropriate role of government in this. She encourages Council to use this report to develop some of the elements that would help lead the City's work in retention and expansion of business. Mayor Lecklider agreed that these are good ideas. He was particularly intrigued with Strategy 2 and the ideas listed, such as Dublin Technology Investment Tax Credit, Dublin Cluster Opportunity Revolving Loan Fund. He was also interested in the ideas contained within Strategy 5 related to redevelopment. It is important to focus on redevelopment going forward, as well as new business development. Mr. Gerber agreed with both, noting that the presentation includes short, middle and long- term strategies. He agrees this would be an excellent goal setting topic, based on the critical importance of economic development to the City. Mr. Reiner stated that the City has exceptional staff and fine leadership in place. This is an impressive analysis, and Dublin is already doing much of this. The new ideas are very interesting and should be explored. He is impressed that the City is engaged in every aspect of this — especially the urban redevelopment of the Bridge Street Corridor, the bicycle trails, and transportation. This is a great opportunity to evaluate where Dublin stands and he commends staff for their leadership. Vice Mayor Salay stated that she finds the concept of a Dublin Innovation Council very interesting. Last year at goal setting, Council discussed some type of entity such as this, and this is a great foundation for such creation. The appreciates the affirmation of the Bridge Street Corridor efforts and the idea that Council needs to stay true to the vision for this, and move forward with the Plan adoption and development. In terms of an agreement with Columbus 2020, it is important to engage more fully in that effort, given the level of their activity. Perhaps staff is already very engaged in Columbus 2020 and Council is not fully aware. Mr. McDaniel responded that he appreciates the feedback on the Innovation Council and the cluster advisory councils. These do tie into Council goals of engaging businesses. With the additional staff in place, economic development staff are better able to engage RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetine Dublin City Council November 14, 2011 Page 12 with the business community and build relationships. It is a natural step to invite these people to participate in advisory bodies. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that she would like to center Council's discussion at goal setting around which one of these recommendations sets Dublin apart from other communities — so Dublin would be unique and different and, as a result, attractive to a cluster group. She would not want the cluster group to dictate to Dublin, but rather, Dublin would choose a cluster and discuss the elements which would advance the City greatest in that cluster. Or perhaps the City would discuss the elements that the community desires to have available in the "toolbox." As a result, the two or three clusters that would be attracted to those kinds of assets could be identified. It is important to retain the goal Dublin has always had -- to be unique and different in assets in comparison to other communities. Mr. McDaniel responded these would all be a great foundation for goal setting discussion. Mrs. Boring stated that there are many strategies presented in this study, and Council needs to prioritize them. Perhaps that can be discussed at the goal setting retreat — next steps, prioritization, and what clusters to pursue. Mayor Lecklider thanked Mr. Tripp, Mr. Gaydos and Mr. McDaniel for this report. STAFF COMMENTS There were no comments from staff. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS /COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Mr. Reiner reported that the recent lectures from the Healthy Dublin initiative will be placed on the website for viewing. In view of the rates of heart disease and cancer in the American population, this initiative, funded by a grant, has brought some of the brightest minds in the health industry to Dublin. More lectures will be scheduled in the coming months. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher: 1. Requested an update in a future packet regarding the status of Digger and Finch and that area of land, as well as the Sunrise Senior project. 2. Noted that in reviewing the memo from staff regarding the Bridge Street Corridor Code, there is an expectation that the review would be completed by December 1. What is the status of the review by Planning & Zoning Commission? Mr. Langworthy responded that the completion date by the Commission will likely be later, as the Commission requested some modifications, which staff has prepared for further review by the Commission. A second review meeting by P&Z is scheduled for December 8. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that, given this, it will likely come to Council in the first quarter of 2012. Mr. Langworthy responded that staff hopes to have the document to Council by January 2012. 3. Noted that Ms. Gilger provided a report regarding net new jobs in Dublin for 2011. She asked if staff could access information from other communities in the region regarding their new jobs — for comparison purposes. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff will follow up. Columbus 2020 may collect this information, but if not, the information can be obtained from the economic development staff in other communities. Ms. Gilger added that Columbus 2020 does track any project over 20,000 square feet — renovation or new construction -- how many jobs are associated with it, and in what community. This is tracked quarterly. 4. Asked about the results of the Dublin Irish Festival, and whether there will be opportunity for discussion about the changes in the profit levels for various segments and the staff assessment of the reason for the changes. Ms. Grigsby stated that this can be scheduled at a Council meeting or as part of the budget discussion on November 21. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council November 14, 2011 Meeting Page 13 Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher responded that the budget discussion would be an appropriate time for this, including any strategy changes that need to be made. 5. Reported that she and Ms. Grigsby attended a MORPC Board meeting last week, and the information packet is available in the Council conference room for review. MORPC is considering relocating their offices in the next year from the current rented space to a building in downtown Columbus they plan to purchase. Mrs. Boring: 1. Commented regarding the board and commission items of interest memo compiled by staff. This process was established in order that members could propose a list of items to Council. It is not mandatory that they propose items each year, but this process helps Council to know the interests of the various groups. In reviewing the memo, she notes that most items are educational in nature. Last year, the Community Development Committee reviewed the proposed lists and made recommendation to Council. In reviewing the proposed items for 2012, there seems no need for a committee review meeting. She proposed that Council approve the lists as submitted for ARB, BZA and PZC. It was the consensus of Council to have ARB, BZA and PZC move forward with their proposed items of interest for 2012. 2. Reported that she and Vice Mayor Salay represented Council at the 21' century learning center initiative meeting at OSU Library. It was a productive session, and will be an integrated approach to the topic. 3. Noted that she recently attended National League of Cities annual conference in Phoenix. Much of what has been discussed tonight was on their program. The format for NLC has been changed, focusing on topics related to Cities and Families; Infrastructure; Sustainability; and Economic Development. The presentations were excellent, and the importance of civic engagement was emphasized for each area. The topics included global economies, how to involve current businesses in the City, bringing in new businesses, venture capital, and sustainability. In regard to the topic of aging infrastructure, Dublin has made a conscious choice to plan for ongoing maintenance. She will have information for Council's consideration in the future. She is hopeful that economic development will be a goal setting topic, as suggested tonight. Mr. Keenan noted that the Coventry Woods neighborhood scheduled a work session in the neighborhood last weekend, which was the second of two. Approximately 15 -20 residents participated, and the City's Service Department provided support in clearing honeysuckle from along the creek bed in the City parkland area. The results are dramatic, and he invited Council Members to visit the area to view it. Mr. Reiner added that this is an excellent example of a community neighborhood working with the government on a maintenance issue. The citizens worked with the City crew and addressed 100 yards of creek bed area in three hours. Kudos to Ron Geese, who has always encouraged the removal of this invasive species. Mr. Keenan thanked the Service Department for their efforts, as well as the residents of the neighborhood. He is hopeful that such a program can be expanded community wide for neighborhoods that want to participate. Mr. Reiner asked how available the City crew would be to assist, should the neighborhoods want to initiate removal of honeysuckle. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff would be more than willing to support this effort, which would move forward the removal of this invasive plant. There was an article in The Columbus Dispatch recently regarding efforts by citizens to remove honeysuckle from Columbus parks and the grant funding they were seeking. Dublin is also exploring potential grant funding for this initiative and will update Council in the future. Mr. Gerber: 1. Stated that he appreciates staffs report regarding new job statistics. Over eight years, Dublin has retained or added 11,350 jobs and in the last four years, during the recession, 5,029. Despite the poor economy, the positive trends are continuing RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council November 14, 2011 Page 14 for Dublin. Hats off to the economic development group for continuing to retain and attract new jobs! 2. Reported that he attended the Veterans Day ceremonies on Friday, along with other Council Members. This event was very well attended, which is reflective of the community and their ongoing support of our veterans. Mr. Keenan added that Jody Davids, keynote speaker for the ceremonies gave a very eloquent speech from the heart. In regard to the Grounds of Remembrance itself, he is impressed with the large number of people it can accommodate – as it was designed to do. Vice Mayor Salay: 1. Reported that she and Mrs. Boring very much enjoyed the 21 century learning initiative meeting at OSU. The four focus groups brought forth many exciting ideas, and everyone seemed to be "on the same page." She asked about a report regarding this discussion and when the next meeting will take place. It is important that all of Council be engaged and have the opportunity to attend some of those key meetings or be informed about them. Pat Losinski indicated that Columbus Metropolitan Library is in the middle of constructing two new facilities in the district over the next 1 -1/2 years, but after that, will be looking to identify their next areas of focus. It is important to continue to move forward with this initiative. She spoke with Mr. Foegler, who attended the meeting, about how a new library could be one of the catalysts for moving the Bridge Street Corridor project forward. 2. Noted in regard to the retreat that if it is Council's desire to have the Battelle report a focus of the session, there is a need to determine how best to use the time wisely, what kind of facilitator is needed for such a discussion, and how best to move this item forward. She appreciates any suggestions. Mayor Lecklider: 1. Noted that he, too, had the honor of participating in the Veterans Day ceremonies on Friday and was similarly impressed by those in attendance. It is especially gratifying to see so many students in attendance and their interaction with the veterans. The site does accommodate a large group very nicely. 2. Commented that long -time Dublin postmaster Bill Doty died on November 10. He was a long -time member of the local VFW and certainly civic minded and involved in many community organizations. He will be missed, and our thoughts and prayers go out to his widow and family. ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Lecklider moved to adjourn to executive session at 9:12 p.m. for personnel, land acquisition, legal and collective bargaining matters. Mr. Gerber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. The meeting was reconvened and formally adjourned at 10:20 p.m. May O fficer i1171�0— Clerk of Council