Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Minutes 07-06-2011RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City 9unCll Meeting July 6, 2011 Mayor Lecklider called the Wednesday, July 6, 2011 Regular Meeting of Dublin City Council to order at 6:30 p.m. at the Dublin Municipal Building. ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Lecklider moved to adjourn to executive session for discussion of land acquisition matters. Mr. Gerber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes. The meeting was reconvened at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Mayor Salay led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present were Mayor Lecklider, Vice Mayor Salay, Mrs. Boring, Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, Mr. Gerber. Mr. Keenan and Mr. Reiner. Staff members present were Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. McDaniel, Ms. Crandall, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Tyler, Mr. Langworthy, Mr. Thurman, Mr. Earman, Mr. Burns, and Mr. Hammersmith, Lt. Farmer and Mr. Richardson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • Regular Meeting of June 27, 2011 Approval of the minutes was delayed until the August 1, 2011 meeting. CORRESPONDENCE The Clerk reported that no correspondence requiring Council action had been received. CITIZEN COMMENTS Scott Drinci Executive Director Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau noted that the Board has elected Pete Fingerhut of the Columbus Zoo as Board President and Eric Belfrage of CB Richard Ellis as President - Elect. Kelli Lynn and Sue Burness continue to serve as Council- appointed representatives to the DCVB Board. • He noted that business in the travel industry is improving and hotel /motel tax revenues are up 10 percent year to date over last year. They are projecting an increase of 3 to 5 percent next year. Overall, looking at the past five years, more visitors are coming to Dublin, but they are paying less for their hotel rooms. The DCVB recently launched a print advertising campaign. They conducted several focus groups in Canton, Springfield and Dayton to gauge perceptions of Dublin, how to better market Dublin as a destination, and how people view Dublin outside of the city. Results indicated people view Dublin very positively, as charming, active, with lots of activity, great restaurants, hospitable, neat and clean, well groomed. People cited Historic Dublin and its restaurants as a tremendous asset to the city. People acquaint the Columbus Zoo with Dublin and mention the Memorial Tournament and Dublin Irish Festival as reasons they visit Dublin. They are working closely with these two groups to increase awareness of Dublin and its hotels /restaurants. This year, there were over 1,300 room nights for the 2011 Ohio High School Athletic Championships — an increase of 49 percent over 2010. For the Arnold Fitness Classic, 1,000 room nights were generated this year, an 86 percent increase over 2010. The DCVB secured the International Conference of Police Chaplains, which attracts 150 attendees from the Midwest for Wednesday through Sunday, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting July 6, 2011 Page 2 approximately 375 room nights. Dublin is a finalist to host the St. Bernard Show in 2013, which is a weeklong event generating 750 room nights. He thanked Council for their support of the Ride Across America Cycling Challenge. He introduced Chet Ridenour, Worthington, Ohio, a Board member with the United States /Australian Rules Football League who announced that the 2013 National Championships would be hosted by Dublin, Ohio. The event will bring visitors from across the United States, Canada, Australia, and worldwide fans. The local economic impact is estimated at $1.1 million. In addition, they have secured the 2012 49 Parallel Cup for Dublin, which is a competition pitting men's and women's teams from the United States and Canada along the 49� parallel. This is expected to generate 600 room nights. Dublin was selected for these two events over numerous cities in the U.S. competing for them. He briefly described the sport and noted that the men's team will participate in the Dublin Irish Festival again this year in an exhibition game. He thanked Council and staff, the DCVB, and all who worked to have this event come to Dublin. He presented an Australian Rules football signed by the President to the Mayor. Mayor Lecklider asked if these games are televised. Mr. Ridenour responded that ESPN 2 has televised some games late in the evening /early morning. Live matches are televised on ESPN 3 and replays can be viewed all weekend. The grand finale is held at the end of September and is televised on ESPN. They are working to lobby for additional airtime. Mr. Reiner asked if there is other support the City can provide. Mr. Ridenour responded that securing the alcohol waiver for the dinner event was very important and is much appreciated. The City's fields are tremendous, and the grant monies are much appreciated. They plan to return to Dublin beyond 2013, as Dublin is centrally located. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher suggested that he provide Mr. Dring with a video of the game. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked for more details about the focus group participants for the DCVB research. Mr. Dring responded these were random residents in Springfield, Dayton and Canton, Ohio and included the women of the household who tend to be the decision makers about family vacations. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher noted that a majority of the weak rating areas for Dublin centered on signage and the ability to locate things. Perhaps staff could contact Mr. Dring for more details about this in order to address the concerns. Mrs. Boring asked about the focus groups, and how weak the lowest ratings were. Mr. Dring responded that the format was more conversational than just simple ratings by the participants. The survey firm assembled the results and assigned the ratings in follow -up to the discussions. Mayor Lecklider asked to what the DCVB attributes the significant increases in room nights for the Arnold Fitness Classic and Nike soccer tournament. Mr. Dring responded that for the Arnold event, a new hockey tournament was secured last year at the Chiller in Dublin. The DCVB works with the tournament director to ensure the participants are aware of the hotels in Dublin and restaurants available. For the Nike tournament, the biggest factor was the division of the Tournament into a boys and girls tournament over two weekends, so Dublin could accommodate all of the participants in Dublin hotels over the two weekends. Mayor Lecklider thanked Mr. Dring for the update and Mr. Ridenour for the good news about the Tournament. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 July 6, 2011 LEGISLATION INTRODUCTION /FIRST READING — ORDINANCES Ordinance 38 -11 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute all Necessary Conveyance Documentation to Accept the Dedication of a 0.125 Acre, More or Less, Fee Simple Interest; a 0.054 Acre, More or Less, Bikepath Easement; and a 0.188 Acre, More or Less, Temporary Construction Easement from Dublin Plaza LP. Mr. Gerber introduced the ordinance. Ms. Grigsby stated that, as outlined in the memo, when the roadway was previously widened, the easement and right -of -way dedications were not made. This legislation provides for the dedication of that right -of -way and the easement for the construction of a sidewalk in this area. There will be a second reading /public hearing at the August 1 Council meeting. Ordinance 39 -11 Creating Section 76.14 of the City of Dublin Codified Ordinances to Prohibit the Use of Certain City-Owned Parking Lots and Right -of -Way for Valet Parking, and Declaring an Emergency. Vice Mayor Salay introduced the ordinance. Mr. Tyler stated that he is available to respond to questions, as well as Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith noted that the legislation is drafted as an emergency because of tomorrow's grand opening of the BriHi Square. The signage has been made and will be installed tomorrow morning, should Council approve this legislation. Staff will begin enforcement of the ordinance tomorrow. As is customary, there will be a period of time when warnings will be issued. Mayor Lecklider stated that the second page of the memo indicates that the proposed regulations will be enforced against the valet parking attendant, which is the way it is described in the ordinance. However, the last sentence of the summary indicates that, "Thus the ordinance regulates the valet parking operator and does not place undue harm on the vehicle owner." Mr. Smith responded that the ordinance regulates the entire operation. The intent was not to cite the operator who is in contract with the restaurants, but rather the valet parking attendant who works for the operator. Staff believes this provides control over the operator as well, because if the valet parking attendants receive tickets because they are told to park in the wrong location by the operator, it will cause disruption to the business. Staff believes that citing the operator versus the valet parking attendance would be cumbersome and enforcement would be problematic. Mayor Lecklider asked how the educational efforts will be handled — will information be provided to both the operators and the attendants? Mr. Smith responded that copies of the ordinance will be provided to the operators and they will share the information with the attendants. Mayor Lecklider asked for clarification. Within the ordinance, the language seems less than specific with respect to what areas are being designated for parking. In order to make this ordinance legally effective, how will this be done? Mr. Smith responded that, under Dublin's Code, the City Manager has the authority to designate any area as non - parking. The signage will indicate that the area has been designated as a "no valet parking" area and will reference the ordinance. It was done this way so that additional legislation will not be necessary to add another designated lot for valet parking. Mr. Keenan pointed out that the legislation does specifically mention City -owned parking lots. Mr. Smith responded that only one lot will be designated as such at the present time. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked for clarification. A meeting is scheduled tomorrow evening in Historic Dublin regarding parking, and she assumes that a copy of this RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meetin July 6, 2011 Page 4 ordinance can be provided to everyone who attends. It can also be included on the meeting agenda for review so that questions can be addressed. Is the owner of every business being given a copy of the ordinance via certified mail? Mr. Tyler responded that this can certainly be done, if Council desires. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that the business owners employ the valet operators, so it would be important to notify the owners. The restaurant owners have not previously taken a position consistent with this legislation. She requested that they be provided with a copy of this ordinance by certified mail. Ms. Grigsby stated that staff can do so, and can also work through the HDBA to distribute the information. Mr. Tyler meets regularly with this group. She agrees that it would be important to have a receipt that the business owner received such notice. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher stated that Mr. Smith indicated that the valet operator or company that employs the valet driver is being sent a letter as well. Mr. Smith responded that is correct. He added that staff will send a certified mail copy and will also hand deliver a copy and have the four companies sign for receipt of it. Mr. Reiner moved to dispense with the public hearing and treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Gerber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes. INTRODUCTION /PUBLIC HEARING — RESOLUTIONS Resolution 30 -11 Adopting the Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio ( SWACO) Solid Waste Management Plan. Vice Mayor Salay introduced the resolution. Mr. Burns stated that this legislation affirms Dublin's support for SWACO's 15 -year Solid Waste Management Plan. This plan is not related to the operations of the landfills and transfer stations, but focuses on SWACO's service to the communities in the District — recycling, support for programs, education, grants, etc. Mr. losue of SWACO is present to respond to any questions about the Plan. Staff has reviewed the Plan and recommends approval. Albert losue Director of Planning and Programs. SWACO noted that this is a 15 -year planning document and is required to be updated each five years under state law. Some of the additional programs provided include yard waste composting, landfill tours for students, illegal dumping and anti - litter programs. There are two important aspects of the Plan required by state law: SWACO must demonstrate there are 15 years of access for solid waste disposal in the District, and this is met by the Franklin County landfill, which has over 25 years of site life remaining today. Secondly, SWACO must meet the recycling goals outlined in the state solid waste management plan. They are 25 percent for residential and commercial recycling and SWACO currently has a 27.1 percent recycling rate now. For the industrial sector, the percentage required is 50 percent and SWACO is currently at 77.4 percent. Therefore, they are meeting all of the recycling goals and the state - mandated access for landfill disposal in the District. This Plan has been reviewed by the SWACO Board and was adopted by the Board. A 30- day public comment period and public hearing took place. SWACO is now in the community ratification phase of the Plan update, where all 41 communities and Franklin County are requested to adopt this 15 -year Plan. He offered to respond to any questions. Mr. Reiner asked if a resident should have yard waste and cannot wait for the City of Dublin to pick it up, is the nearest drop -off site at Kurtz Brothers. Mr. losue responded that SWACO has contracts with Kurtz Brothers and with Ohio Mulch for this service, and they each have multiple locations. There is no cost to RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting July 6, 2011 Page 5 residents for this drop -off service, which is subsidized by SWACO's community outreach program. Mr. Reiner asked if commercial haulers can use these sites as well. Mr. losue responded there is a small fee of $5 per ton for the commercial entities. Mr. Burns added that the closest drop -off site to Dublin is on Houchard Road, and it accepts yard waste. Mr. Keenan asked about the average recycling rate in the county. Mr. losue responded it is 27.1 percent. Mr. Keenan asked about Dublin's recycling rate. Mr. losue responded he believes it is approximately 34 percent. Dublin has always been a leader in recycling and a leader in the consortium implemented nine years ago for solid waste collection. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes. Resolution 31 -11 Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the 2011 Street Maintenance Program - Phase 2. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Mr. Hammersmith stated that Phase 2 of this annual program focuses on bikepaths. Bids were opened on June 23. The Engineer's estimate was $850,000 and of the four bids, Strawser Paving Company was the lowest/best bidder. The staff report lists the bikepath projects scheduled for this year. There are three street components that will be performed as part of this work: Corbins Mill Drive sidewalk improvement; repairs on Eiterman Road; and a pedestrian crossing improvement on Tullymore Drive near Newgrange. The remainder of the work is bikepath related. Affected residents will be contacted as well as civic associations, and information will be available on the City's website and in a brochure distributed to the property owners. Staff recommends approval of the bid from Strawser Paving in the amount of $855,749.51. This is less than the amount budgeted of $965,000, and the difference will be used for contingency purposes. Vice Mayor Salay asked if the entire portion of Eiterman between Shier -Rings and SR 161 is the responsibility of the City of Dublin to maintain. Mr. Hammersmith responded that he believes so, based on an annexation that took place several years ago. There will be additional improvements needed to Eiterman Road in the future. Mr. Keenan added that this roadway carries heavy traffic with the emergency equipment that uses the pavement near the Township Administration building. Mr. Hammersmith stated that a consideration is that there may be potential changes in the roadway network in conjunction with the Central Ohio Innovation Center and so some needed improvements may be delayed. Mayor Lecklider asked if a new crosswalk is being created along Tullymore. Mr. Hammersmith responded that pavement narrowing will be done, upon the request of residents who cross in this location that does not have a marked crosswalk. The street will be narrowed to provide 22 feet of pavement for vehicles, creating a bump out which will increase awareness of pedestrians in this location. This is at the intersection of Newgrange and Tullymore. Mrs. Boring noted a major change is being made on Tullymore at the request of the residents. How are such concerns typically handled? For example, in Waterford Village, there are signs about the resident votes to retain or remove the speed humps. She is concerned with how requests are handled and reviewed with all of the citizens in the area. Mr. Hammersmith responded that when such a request is received, staff evaluates the situation in the field through observations and determines whether an improvement is RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Page 6 warranted. In this case, there is significant pedestrian movement and a long, straight stretch of wide roadway, resulting in higher speeds than desired. This is considered a safety improvement for pedestrians. This is not the case for all requests that come to staff. Based on evaluation, sometimes the response is that the improvement is not warranted. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes. Resolution 32 -11 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the Franklin County Board of Commissioners and the Franklin County Sheriff's Office to Comply with Ohio Revised Code Section 2901.07. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Lt. Farmer indicated that in 2010, Senate Bill 77 was passed, mandating that as of July 1, 2011, the City is required to obtain a DNA sample from any adult arrested for a felony. The Sheriff's office offered a contract to perform these services. The City of Dublin intends to handle the collection of DNA, which is a simple procedure consisting of swabbing the inside of the cheek. If there is an unforeseen event when the City is unable to collect the DNA from an adult arrested for a felony, Franklin County has offered to do this at the jail site in a controlled setting for a cost of $35 for each service. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Resolution 32 -11, authorizing execution of this contract to ensure compliance with state law in such an unforeseen circumstance. He offered to respond to questions. Mr. Keenan stated there would be a considerable amount of responsibility with respect to the integrity of the evidence. Mr. Farmer noted that this DNA collection cannot be used to prosecute someone — it is only used to identify a suspect in the future by means of searching a database of DNA collections. Mr. Gerber asked Mr. Smith if he has reviewed this contract. Mr. Smith responded affirmatively. Mr. Gerber noted that there is a provision in the contract for automatic renewal every 12 months. With respect to the cost, which is not to exceed $3,000 over 24 months, the contract does not appear to include a mechanism for a price increase after 24 months. Mr. Smith responded that if a price change is desired, a new contract must be proposed. He expects the usage of this service will be very minimal. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes. Resolution 33 -11 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Columbia Gas of Ohio to Extend a High Pressure Natural Gas Line to the City's Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Mr. Burns stated that Resolutions 33 -11 through 36 -11 all relate to the CNG fueling facility project. The project consists of replacing 44 light duty vehicles with CNG burning vehicles; modifying the existing fueling facility to compress and dispense natural gas; and making modifications to the existing fleet maintenance facility to allow the City's mechanics to safely and legally work on CNG - fueled vehicles. Several legislative items are needed to implement the CNG fueling facility project, including an agreement with Columbus Gas, an agreement with IGS, a CNG equipment bid, and later, acceptance of the bid for the construction phase. Currently, the 44 CNG fueled vehicles have been purchased and some have arrived; the conversion kits for the RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetins Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Page 7 vehicles are ready to be ordered, and they will be installed in house by trained City mechanics. The CNG equipment bid acceptance is on tonight's agenda. Resolution 33 -11 relates to an agreement with Columbus Gas. The existing infrastructure supplying natural gas cannot accommodate the compressors and related equipment for this project. Staff has negotiated an agreement with Columbia Gas to construct an additional, higher pressure gas line to the facility. The line will run on the north side of Shier -Rings Road from Eiterman Road east to the fleet maintenance facility. He noted a correction to the staff report, that an additional easement may be needed, based on the size of the gas line. This may require additional legislation in the future. The provisions of the Columbia Gas agreement are that the City would pay them $165,179 to install the line and the City would have to consume, purchase or use at least $3,146 of natural gas per year. This amount should be easily achieved by the City's 44 vehicles. Once other vehicles are converted to natural gas, he expects that Columbus Gas will be paying the City each year. Rod Davidson of Schottenstein, Zox and Dunn has worked on this project and is available to respond to questions. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution. Vice Mayor Salay asked for the cost differential between natural gas and gasoline, assuming natural gas is cheaper and cleaner than gasoline? Mr. Burns responded that compressed natural gas is cleaner, emissions are reduced 30 -35 percent over gasoline- burning vehicles, and there is a 60 -75 percent reduction over emissions of diesel vehicles. The cost of natural gas versus gasoline is calculated in gasoline gallon equivalents. One gasoline gallon equivalent of natural gas equals a gallon of gasoline fuel. The cost of a GGE of natural gas today is approximately $1.13, based on the current price of gasoline of @$3.60 per gallon. It is a significant difference. There is a typo in the memo — it should indicate $1.13, and not $1.60. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes. Resolution 34 -11 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Easement with American Electric Power (AEP) for the Installation of Electric Service for the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Mr. Burns stated that the electrical service must also be upgraded to accommodate the amount of power needed to operate the compressors. AEP already owns easements on the property. This request for an additional easement involves approximately 100 feet on the City property, adjacent to the fleet maintenance building, and allows installation of another line and meter. Staff recommends approval. Vote on the Resolution: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes. Resolution 35 -11 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with IGS Energy to be the Sole Supplier of Natural Gas to the Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Mr. Burns stated that IGS is a partner with the City in the CNG project, and IGS is contributing $275,000 to the project. The agreement provides that IGS will be the sole provider of natural gas to the facility for the five -year term of the agreement in recognition of their contribution. In addition, IGS will be given marketing rights and allowed to sell natural gas to private fleets and individual customers. These customers would be allowed to fuel their vehicles at the City facility. The City's needs would be a priority, but IGS will have the opportunity to market to other customers. In addition, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of _ M Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 IGS requested that a small decal be placed on the City vehicles indicating that the natural gas is supplied by IGS Energy. IGS has provided a competitive price for natural gas and staff recommends approval of the resolution. Representatives of IGS are present and can respond to questions. Mayor Lecklider noted that the memo indicates the City will sell compressed natural gas at cost plus additional administrative fees, including the cost of natural gas compression, distribution fees and dispensing. He assumes that a City employee would need to be on site to assist with dispensing. Mr. Burns responded that a City employee would not be on site for this service. IGS would issue a fuel card to identify the customer and when /how much fuel they can dispense. There will no need for staffing on site for this purpose. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher thanked IGS for their significant contribution to this project. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Vice Mayor Salay, yes. Resolution 36 -11 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Compressed Natural Gas Station Equipment Project. Mr. Gerber introduced the resolution. Mr. Burns indicated that this project was out to bid five to six weeks ago for the equipment to compress and dispense natural gas as a vehicle fuel. Staff followed the Department of Energy regulations for bidding and received two bids. One was from ANGI Energy Systems for $789,399.25 and the other from IMW for $931,900. Staff and the consultants, together with the Legal department has closely reviewed the bids and determined that ANGI Energy Systems is the lowest and best bid and recommends approval of this resolution. Representatives of ANGI Energy Systems are present to respond to questions. He added that one of the representatives is a resident of Dublin. Vote on the Resolution: Vice Mayor Salay, yes; Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Ms. Grigsby stated that this project has been underway for over a year, and Mr. Burns, Ms. Crandall, the Fleet staff and the Legal department have engaged in this effort. This is a significant project for the City to undertake, and the City is able to do so as a result of the partnership with IGS and the grant received from the Department of Energy. This project is significant in terms of progress toward Council's sustainability goal, and she is pleased that it is now moving forward. Mr. Keenan asked if the Dublin Schools buses can be converted to CNG at some point to reduce pollution. Mr. Burns responded affirmatively. Mr. Keenan noted that having the school transportation system converted to this system will be a big step forward from a sustainability perspective. Mr. Burns added that as part of the construction phase for this project, infrastructure is being run to the school bus facility property line to allow them at some future point to install slow fill dispensers and still use the City's compressors. He believes the Schools will convert within the next five years. Vice Mayor Salay commented that it is a cost issue for the Schools, as it is expensive to convert the buses from diesel fuel to CNG. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher suggested that staff should include a story in Dublin Life magazine about this project — citing the sustainability goal progress as a result of the project and the partnership aspect. Thanks to staff for their efforts in this initiative. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Meeting Page 9 Mayor Lecklider commented that he is appreciative that Ms. Grigsby has pointed out the staff efforts that have brought this project forward. Ms. Grigsby commented that this also reduces the City's dependence upon petroleum products. Staff anticipates it will continue to be less costly to use natural gas. By having reduced fuel costs and having secured grant funds and the contribution from IGS, this project will bring significant savings for the City. OTHER Discussion re. Bridge Street Corridor Mayor Lecklider stated that tonight's agenda includes a free exchange of comments among Council Members regarding the initiative to give some guidance to staff. Each Council Member will have an opportunity to make comments. Mr. Reiner commented that at the last Council meeting, there was discussion about the "missing vision" and he is hopeful that tonight's comments can be shared with the Planning group. One of the ideas that came up previously was the riverfront park that now is missing, and there was concern over that. He views the Corridor as three pods that are very important to develop: the OCLC pod, the Historic Dublin pod, and the Dublin Village Center pod. The 161 Corridor is already well handled, as established businesses exist along this corridor, including an international corporate headquarters, a jeweler who has built a beautiful new building, La Scala Restaurant and others. Currently, these active businesses pay taxes and therefore this portion is not in need of redevelopment at this time. There are potential sites for the new type of urban development, and he would like Council to develop a limited statement about what they believe is missing in the vision in the master plan, so that this can be addressed and incorporated. As Chair of the Community Development Committee, he urged Council to keep tonight's discussion brief and to the point. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher stated that in reading the vision statements again, she was struck by the words contained, which supported her concept of what the City was planning to do with the Corridor. However, at this point, she feels she has not heard, or she has missed, or the communication is different from what she reads in the vision statements. There are words such as "exceptional greenspace preserved" and "outstanding natural features." However, she does not see exceptional greenspace, but rather pockets of greenspace, not dramatic enough to draw attention to them. The vision statement speaks to "inviting walking and gathering" — which suggests an area that people are drawn to, with lots of activity within, and not so much passive pedestrian use as a combination of passive and active use. On page 6, it talks of ., reinforcing economic development strategies through an enduring commitment to exemplary planning and design" and "will help create places that make Dublin stand out and stay competitive: That is what she does not see in the recent documents — something unique and different. It is simply "cookie cutter pieces," without interconnection to make a dynamic area and statement, drawing people to live and work there, and to enjoy while walking around. On page 8, it speaks of "great cultural connections with expanded civic uses such as libraries." Council talked at length at the goal setting retreat about placing the library in a learning center and discussed exciting ideas of partnership and opportunities between OCLC, the Columbus Metropolitan Library, the Dublin Schools and the City. Recently, there has been extensive coverage in the Columbus Dispatch about the opening of the Scioto Mile park. Alan McKnight, Columbus Parks and Recreation Director spoke of the Scioto River, which has long existed, yet only now is being opened to the external area with the Scioto Mile project. She had anticipated Dublin would do the same with the Scioto River in Historic Dublin — that the river would be the centerpiece and all of the interaction of the public would be inclusive of the river. In more recent discussions, she has heard nothing of this for the Corridor Plan. Tonight, she envisioned this learning center and, depending upon placement, how the river could be incorporated. She is concerned that the exciting ideas previously discussed are being lost. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Page 10 Mr. Reiner mentioned the three pods — with OCLC at the western end and which has a great desire to open their complex to the world, and with the Indian Run close by; the — middle portion, which could be the 21 century learning center; and then the river and what could be a central park that extends up into Dublin Village Center. It could be a combination of an entertainment district — retail, business, residential components — with a more urban feel. She is aware that there are many districts included in the Corridor Plan, but perhaps the overall vision is lost in this division. Perhaps the pods need to have more interaction within and be more integrated to the adjacent pod. She had expected this project to be a dramatic centerpiece for Dublin that would complete it in a way that would be comprehensive, with a place in town accommodating all of the lifestyles people desire in different phases of their lives. She does not feel there is "drama" in the presentations to date. Even the transportation system can be dramatic, and she wants Council to consider bold ways of moving people through town — not depending upon COTA or federal and state government. What could Dublin do in a small geographic area that would be unique and different? These are her comments to share. Mrs. Boring noted that she was not present at the last Council meeting, but sent Council Members a memo with her comments on the Bridge Street Corridor. She is looking for more interaction between Council and the Planning department. Council has not had the opportunity to provide ideas to staff for them to explore. The vision plan was approved by Council, but since that time, there has not been opportunity for this discussion. In terms of the pods, there are too many and they are not integrated as they should be. Someone at the last meeting indicated that Dublin has always been proactive, but is now being reactive. This is reflected in the Bridge Street Corridor plan, as well. When questions arise, the response from staff is that, "The Code will address that issue." The way this is developing is that Council is not setting the standards — the developers will address these issues when development comes forward. There has been no opportunity for "give and take" in the process. She believes the library placement must be determined before street locations are finalized; the grid streets make sense, but they do not work in scale. The City should not be so tied to an idea as to lose flexibility. The shocking aspect of the plan is that the greenspace near the river has disappeared. She would like definitions of walkability and connectivity. The last plan included green strips of connectivity, but what about walkability? Is there a difference? Currently, it seems the tool is being developed, which will create the vision. She wants to have a more active discussion between Council and Planning Commission and an opportunity to share and discuss ideas. The interaction needed has not occurred to date. She is not certain about her support of a form -based Code, but perhaps more education is needed. At the present time, she is totally uncomfortable with the form -based Code concept, as it does not result in the vision that Council adopted. Mr. Gerber stated that there is clearly a need to vet the vision for this Code. He has spoken with several architects, and they all seem to have a different concept of form - based Code. The best definition he has received to date is that a form -based Code is not straight line Code, but instead is based upon a concept or vision. On page 16 of the vision report, it indicates, "This conceptual plan should be interpreted as one possible development outcome that reflects market opportunity and the intent of the vision principles. Actual outcomes that differ from this illustrative concept are inevitable, but all development should make every effort to embody the vision principles." He is not certain that everyone is in agreement with what those vision principles are. In keeping with the tradition of thoroughly vetting this, he would prefer to have a workshop where Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and staff — not consultants -- have in depth discussion in a roundtable fashion. This would help everyone to understand each visionary principle. Otherwise, this is just another version of urbanism, which is not what he expected and is not exciting or different. There is clearly a need to "Dublinize" this — as has been done in the past with other plans. There has been discussion of a new 21 century learning center, and now is the time to discuss this. There has been discussion about green space and Riverside Drive, and these items can be discussed in the workshop as well. There has not been MeetinLl RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council ALBLANK INC. FORM NO. LOWS July 6, 2011 Held Meetine Page 11 an opportunity for these three groups to review the vision report and make sure the principles are fully understood. He wants to have staff's assistance in helping to understand what form -based Code is. In addition, discussion is needed about who will serve as the gatekeeper. There is an architectural review team established in the Code, but who comprises that team? Those are the people who will carry out the vision. What discretion do they have, and what are the expectations of Council? It is important to have this discussion among Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and staff so that everyone is on the same page. At this point, his sense is that everyone is not on the same page. He is aware that business owners have concerns about property rights, and he is confident that these concerns will be addressed to their satisfaction. For him, the Code is simply a "menu" after the concept is in place. Absent a good concept, he is not certain what the Code will mean. Mr. Keenan commented that he has the least amount of experience among Council Members in this area, but he wants this Plan to encourage the opening of a critical land mass needed to make the entire corridor work. That could range from the relocation of Riverside Drive, opening up the east side of the river and having a learning center as discussed. In terms of connectivity and walkability, a pedestrian bridge across the river, as Council viewed in Greenville, South Carolina should be considered. Continuing to work with the Schools with respect to gaining a critical land mass in the District is important as well as continuing to encourage walkability. In the long run, the City will need to improve its walkability and connectivity, and at some point, if there were a viable option to close roads and redirect traffic to have a walkable area, that should be considered. Perhaps consideration should be given to diverting roads through some of the OCLC grounds, behind the School land, or other possibilities. His belief is that creating a critical land mass is very important for the District. Vice Mayor Salav stated that she is concerned that in the meetings held up to this point, there were many presentations about important elements of the Plan, yet much of this information could have been provided in a memo — indicating that the utility systems are adequate and can support the Plan. That meeting time could have been used in a different way. In terms of the park along Riverside Drive, someone noted at the recent meeting that the land mass was somewhat smaller, and that became a stopping point for any further progress at the meeting. She wants to understand the decisions that are being made with respect to Riverside Drive — including a roundabout or not, the location of the future road and the existing shopping center viability going forward. She does not want the vision abandoned for the Riverside Drive park for the sake of a shopping center that may not be viable long -term. This park is an important part of the vision, although it may not come about in the short term. This is clearly a policy decision for all of Council. She had understood that a roundabout was planned for Riverside Drive /161 intersection, which would be easy for bicycles and pedestrians to navigate. She would like to hear about the ideas the engineers now have for this intersection. She wants to ensure that all of Council understands the form -based Code, and it is important to have architects who understand it on board as well. In previous field trips, Council has learned about pattern books, which helped everyone to understand the vision of a plan in other communities. This may be a good tool for this Plan as well. In terms of the library, a great opportunity exists for this initiative. She is not certain how such a facility can be sited, as the land mass is not under the City's control at this time. In terms of the business owners with concerns, attorney Ben Hale who represents some of these businesses complimented staff for addressing their concerns and their willingness to meet. On the other hand, she does not want a car dealership that has changed ownership to dictate what will occur in this corridor in the future — it is too important and will transcend these businesses over the 20 -year timeframe for implementation. Perhaps the excitement about the vision has diminished because of the format of the meetings, with many presentations and attendees. She was pleased that Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher recently brought up MORPC's Complete Streets video, which has reinvigorated her thinking about the concepts being implemented in the corridor. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Page 12 Perhaps another speaker or another vision discussion, revisiting the concepts and reinvigorating the process would be worthwhile. In the meetings to date, the focus has been on individual parts of the Plan, and not on the vision as a whole. It is important to recapture this excitement, use what has been learned, and go forward with this vision. She is very excited about the vision plan that Council has adopted. Mayor Lecklider stated that it appears there is the most consensus regarding the east side of the river. Council has also heard from staff about some of the changes that have taken place after the initial vision document, to the extent that the vision identifies the east side of the river as someplace for this pedestrian bridge that many have had in mind since the field trips. He does not believe that there is any particular project such as that which Council necessarily wants to duplicate identically, but the Greenville field trip presented a concept of something that was embraced by many. What he hears everyone articulating, and what he agrees with is that everyone wants a place to go on the east side of the river — something relatively substantial, perhaps including the redirection of Riverside Drive. That is as specific as he wants to be with respect to any portion of this Plan. There are reasons why this is otherwise conceptual, not unlike the Community Plan in some respects. There was some discussion in an earlier meeting about green spaces and he felt the direction at the time was headed to specifically identifying green spaces throughout this entire Corridor area, and very nearly specifying exact dimensions. His understanding of what was underway was trying to formulate a vision, allowing that to be carried out over a period of time, and having it be market driven. That could change over a period of time. In page 16 of the vision report, it indicates that development will occur incrementally, in different stages and in different places over a timeframe of 20 years or longer. To the extent the City might identify a specific area for a green corridor or specific green space, he is not certain how that might change if the development does not occur for ten years. Although Council has indicated they would like to see a certain amount of greenspace, connectivity, etc., he does not necessarily want to be more specific than that — with the exception of the east side of the river and if there would be strong consensus for a town green in the central Historic District. He envisions that this Plan is purely conceptual, with opportunity for input, but allowing for the Plan to be market driven, with control existing by way of the form -based Code. Personally, he does not have experience with form -based Code. He does not want Council to lose sight of the vision for this Plan. He is hearing tonight that there is much positive feedback about the vision document. In terms of the Plan being "dramatic" — as Ms. Chin nici-Zuercher has mentioned — a concern he has is that the City has been moving toward a more "Dublinized" urbanization — instead of something that will surprise people 20 years out as something dramatically different for Dublin. Mr. Reiner's comments about the three primary areas are on point. The City cannot necessarily site the library of the future, but some believe the OCLC property would be a good location for it. He noted that on NPR radio, he recently heard a story about the early stages of the development of Manhattan. The government leaders engaged in the effort of extensive use of eminent domain, creating a grid system of streets, and made many existing property owners unhappy. Manhattan is now some of the most expensive property in the world. He is not advocating this for Dublin, but is hopeful that Dublin can maintain the vision, while protecting the interests and property rights of those businesses that currently exist, particularly along 161. The City should be sensitive to their concerns. He is hopeful, going forward, that a connection can be drawn between the vision and the Code, recapturing some of the excitement felt at the outset. The meetings held have been useful, but it is now important to let the vision be the guiding force in terms of what is done with the Code. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher noted she is pleased that Vice Mayor Salay referenced the pattern book viewed in Feld trips. The developers in those communities indicated that the pattern book helped them understand the vision. The problem with the form -based Code is that it is just that — a Code — and not a vision as articulated in a pattern book. In terms of parks, she personally does desire having a central park and is willing to purchase the land for it. Things will then come together around a publicly -owned RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meetin July 6, 2011 Page 13 central park. The proposed pocket parks are more similar to the parkland donation set aside by developers at the current time. In terms of vision statements, she supports the ones included in the document. What is troubling is how they are being implemented, and this seems to be where the disconnect has occurred. She does not disagree with the bigger concepts of the vision statements. She added that, following the Greenville, SC field trip, Commissioners Freimann and Taylor proposed a vision for a bridge for Historic Dublin, connecting the river and the east side. They did not receive positive feedback to their proposal. For her, she is seeking something that dramatic — a long term vision — one where people someday would be amazed that Dublin could carry out such a progressive vision at the beginning of the 21 century. Mr. Freimann and Mr. Taylor had imagined that type of dramatic vision for Dublin — putting Dublin on the map with more than pedestrian walkways. Ms. Grigsby stated that staff appreciates the feedback. When the memo was prepared in mid -June for the joint session on June 20, staff recognized that the Bridge Street Corridor timetable needed to be adjusted to allow more discussion time. Currently, staff is proposing the date of August 11 for the next workshop, which will allow the discussion that Council has requested. Other key points that have come up relate to the library and the 21S century learning environment. Staff has continued to have discussions with the library and various universities regarding that vision. From their perspective, it will require time to determine the location, the components, and the university presence at the location. Staff will provide updates to Council when that information is available. In regard to the parks and open space, the discussion held over a year ago was that the concept plan is based on the vision and will not likely be what is implemented. The principles and vision statements with the vision report will guide that development. She acknowledged that there have been many presentations by consultants, but the form -based Code is a major change for the City and the grid street transportation system is also quite different for Dublin. Staff recognized that there is now a need for further discussion in follow up to these workshops. Staff will work to assemble some information, and on August 1 will have a draft agenda for the August 11 workshop for Council to review, if that is desired. Vice Mayor Salay commented that a draft agenda would be helpful. She is interested in staff's recommendations about how to move forward, in view of the feedback provided tonight. She knows that the consultants from Goody Clancy have worked through this process with other clients. Ms. Grigsby responded that in reviewing potential dates, David Dixon's availability was an important consideration. He does a good job in marrying the vision, the Code and transportation systems, as evidenced in other cities where they have worked. Mrs. Boring stated that she agrees with staff providing a draft agenda for the August 11 workshop. She noted that the consultants presented information at the workshop sessions, but there was no follow -up discussion among Council. She is hopeful that Council can discuss the critical aspects at the next workshop. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that she recalls a workshop at the Rec Center with working groups, generating wonderful ideas. However, no one took notes at the session. She would like an agenda that allows small group engagement in a dialogue with someone taking good notes and reporting out the concepts to the larger group. The concepts can then be fleshed out in the bigger group. She was very disappointed that the ideas were lost. Other board and commission members have had wonderful suggestions, such as Mr. Souders and Mr. Taylor. People are very interested in this initiative and want to articulate their desires for the Plan. The environment needs to support this dialogue, and the dialogue needs to be captured successfully. Mr. Keenan agreed with having staff provide a draft agenda on August 1 for the August 11 workshop. He encourages Ms. Amorose Groomes to have P &Z members view this segment of the Council meeting on the cable broadcast so they can weigh in on August 11. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting July 6, 2011 Page 14 Mayor Lecklider stated that it would also be useful for Mr. Dixon to hear this dialogue. To clarify, his understanding is that everyone has positive feedback about the vision plan, and no one is suggesting going back to the beginning of the process. What is being suggested is engaging in a discussion to refine what has been done to date. Ms. Chin nici-Zuercher clarified she is not suggesting starting over with the process. She is suggesting more open dialogue about the land and the vision statements. Mrs. Boring stated that everyone has been positive about the concepts in the vision plan. Her issue is with how they are being carried out. Vice Mayor Salay commented about the structure of the meetings. She acknowledged that it is important that everyone be in the same room, but with such a large group and everyone wanting to comment or ask questions, and with the different roles and the individual perspectives of the various bodies of ARB, BZA, P &Z and Council, there are challenges with this structure. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher suggested that all of the groups should be intermixed so they can share their ideas as well as hear ideas of other groups. The tables need to be mixed with citizens and board - commission members. The City should also encourage citizens to attend the August workshop, which will be an interactive meeting. Mr. Gerber stated that he supports the principles of this, but this is not his expectation for the workshop. The Planning Commission has been asked to vet the Code, and his expectation is that they will vet the visionary principles as well. This may be the appropriate time to define what form -based Code means to staff so that everyone can be on the same page. The vision report must be taken to a place where everyone is working from the same idea and concept in terms of interpreting the Code. He is supportive of this, but wants to ensure that P &Z and Council and staff are on the same page for implementation. His vision of the August 11 workshop is for Council, P &Z, and staff as participants. This is now time to carry out some of the policies for the implementation phase, and that is the role of P &Z. Mr. Reiner agreed with Mr. Gerber about the meeting structure, noting that P &Z needs to refine this because they are charged with the planning and development review for Council. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher asked what they are being asked to refine. Mr. Gerber stated that he believes it is time to flesh out the visionary principles. He is not sure what they will look like within a form -based Code. Mayor Lecklider stated that Vice Mayor Salay, Mr. Gerber and Mr. Reiner have agreed with respect to those who should be at the table in order to have a productive workshop on August 11 — based on the decisions that have to be made and by whom. Mr. Gerber clarified that he is not advocating anything other than fleshing out the visionary principles to ensure everyone is on the same page for implementation phase — the type of buildings that will come forward, etc. Ms. Grigsby stated that some good points have been made in terms of Council adopting policy that P &Z then implements. BZA and ARB have a more narrow focus, and staff will need to identify how the new Code will impact what they do. As far as the policy discussion and issue of taking the form -based Code and transportation concepts and implementing the vision, it makes sense to have Council, P &Z and staff at the table. This will ensure the focus is on the policy and the citywide implementation. Certainly, the BZA and ARB members can be present in the audience and provide feedback, but this will make meeting management easier. Mrs. Boring stated that she supports what Mr. Gerber and Vice Mayor Salay have indicated. However, she is not convinced that everyone is aligned regarding the vision. She is not certain that it is defined adequately in order to be applied. She thinks the process is somewhat in reverse — the Codes are being drafted and the vision is following. Her frustration is that in the past, Council has set the expectations in the RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetin Dublin City Coun July 6, 2011 Page 15 vision. Now, there have been questions about the vision, but the response has been to wait until the issue is addressed in the Code. Mr. Gerber stated that he is hopeful that the workshop will address this very issue so that the process can move forward. Mrs. Boring agreed that there is not the need for a huge group in this discussion, given the outcome expected. Mr. Reiner stated that in the final analysis, there will be either a well written, form - based Code that everyone supports and that will be implemented appropriately or there will be the need to move away from this and have P &Z return to a modified PUD process to review the vision of this new urban site. These are the two choices. He is hopeful that P &Z will be able to tighten this up so that all the loopholes are closed. Mr. Gerber agreed. Mayor Lecklider commented that he is not suggesting that Council not strive for a 100 percent comfort level, but, personally, he can accept not achieving this. It seems inevitable with something as new and different as this Code. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Grigsby reoorted: 1. The Irish Festival packets will be sent out to Council on Friday, July 22, together with an informational Council packet. Mayor Lecklider asked if Council needs to respond to the letter from Mr. Driscoll, which was included in the packet. Ms. Grigsby responded that there have been discussions in the past with The Edwards Company regarding this matter, and staff will continue to engage in these discussions. Staff will review the impacts of this situation on The Edwards Company and ensure that what they are requesting does not place any unreasonable risk or liability on the City. If The Edwards Company can demonstrate how the City can achieve its security, the City will consider this change in policy. Mr. Smith commented that he had discussions with The Edwards Company today, and staff is seeking additional information from them. Mr. Smith introduced Jim Smolik, an intern now working at Schottenstein, Zox and Dunn who is a junior at University of Dayton and has also worked this summer for Senator Portman in Washington. He is exploring public sector careers and will work at SZD the remainder of the summer, prior to returning to UD. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS /COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Mrs. Borina: 1. Stated that the City has excellent master plan documents and, typically, they include policies, issues and strategies. Recently, there has been much discussion and interest in the topic of public art. She believes that it is an appropriate time to refer the Arts Chapter of the Parks & Recreation Master Plan to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission to work with staff to develop some draft policies and strategies. This Committee has expressed interest in becoming a vital part of City policy development for recommendation to Council. It is an ideal time to establish a framework with the public art strategies included in the adopted master plan. She moved to refer this chapter to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission to work with staff to begin developing some draft policies for Council's consideration. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Salay stated that she is very supportive of this, but wants to ensure that staff is able to devote resources to this assignment at this time. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff can do so, because there are some issues related to the pending agreement in process with the Dublin Arts Council. This work could RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 Page 16 Held 20 provide guidance in addressing some of those issues. She asked Mr. Hahn to comment regarding staff time for this assignment. Mr. Hahn stated that he would enlist the Office of the City Manager staff in this project and believes that progress could be made on some of the policies and issues identified in the Arts Chapter. He will work with PRAC to provide some draft recommendations for policies for Council's review. Mr. Gerber asked if Mrs. Boring envisions PRAC reviewing art in parks, in neighborhoods, or other? Mrs. Boring responded that all of the information for review is included in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan Arts Chapter. PRAC would recommend policies regarding public art. Mayor Lecklider asked if this contemplates coordination with the Dublin Arts Council. Mr. Gerber asked if PRAC would coordinate with the DAC, or would PRAC research the issues and bring recommendations to Council. Mr. Keenan added that public art can be many things — small and large — throughout the community, such as the bicycle racks in Historic Dublin and benches on bikepaths. He envisions the City using bed tax funds for small public art projects such as these. Within the framework of the policy being discussed, there should be some mechanism that allows for this. Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher stated that the policies need to be developed — it is not about the DAC or PRAC but about developing policies and procedures for how public art is handled in the City. She would hope that this process is inclusive of the DAC. It was the consensus of Council to proceed with referral of the Arts Chapter to PRAC as suggested, with recommendations to be brought to Council. 2. Commented that one policy in the Parks & Recreation Master Plan relates to maintenance, and she assumes this would also be part of the Arts Chapter review by PRAC. In this regard, she is hopeful that consideration can be given to establishing an ongoing fund for cemetery maintenance. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff has coordinated the necessary maintenance work for the public art pieces, and ensures there is up -to -date information about each piece and its condition. Staff has engaged some arts professionals and consultants in this endeavor. The update to the Five -Year Capital Improvements Plan will identify funds to be allocated for maintenance of public art. Part of what will be considered going forward is whether this funding remains in the capital fund, or whether it is handled as a capital item in the hotel /motel tax fund or handled as a City- sponsored hotel /motel tax grant application. 3. Stated that the July 4th celebration was by far the best! The table arrangements were excellent, the concert was the finest, and it was great fun. Everyone who worked on this event did a great job! Ms. Chinn ici-Zuercher echoed Mrs. Boring's comments. Hats off to the staff for a great celebration on July 4 9 . Vice Mayor Salav reported that she will forward the documents for the Clerk's evaluation to Council this month so that it can be completed during the Council recess. Mayor Lecklider: 1. Noted that compliments to staff are in order for the evening events of July 4` as well as the fishing derby, the parade, and other activities. He appreciates everyone's efforts, and the community greatly enjoyed the holiday. 2. Reported that he has information regarding arrangements for the Arthritis Foundation Classic Auto Show this weekend, which he will share with Council Members who are interested in attending. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meetine Dublin City Council July 6, 2011 May or fi. • O fficer Page 17 07z � Clerk of Council