HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 29-11RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Inc.
Ordinance No.
29 -11 Passed 20
AN ORDINANCE ADJUSTING THE EXISTING WARD
BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, AS REQUIRED
BY ARTICLE 9.04 OF THE REVISED CHARTER,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, the Revised Charter requires that no later than July 1, 2001, and no less
frequently than every ten years thereafter, Council shall divide or re- divide the City
into four wards of substantially equal population for the purpose of electing four ward
Council members at the next regular municipal election; and
WHEREAS, the 2010 federal census data has now been provided to the City of
Dublin; and
WHEREAS, City Council has convened to discuss the proposed ward adjustments,
based upon population changes to the existing wards, as substantiated by the 2010
U.S. census data.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
� � of its elected members concurring, that:
Section 1 . The corporate limits of the City of Dublin be and the same hereby is
divided into the wards as bounded and described as Scenario 1 in Exhibit "A" with the
respective population indicated, pursuant to Article 9.04 of the Revised Charter.
Section 2 . The Boards of Elections of Franklin, Delaware and Union counties, upon
receipt of a certified copy of this Ordinance, are hereby authorized and directed to
accept the wards enumerated herein for all purposes of election, as authorized by the
Revised Charter of the City of Dublin, Ohio.
Section 3. This Ordinance is declared to be an emergency necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare, and for the
further reason that the Revised Charter requires that Council redivide the four wards of
the City no later than July 1, 2011. This ordinance shall therefore be effective upon
passage.
Passed this l tt day of 2011.
Mayor - Pres& g Officer
ATTEST:
�" L
Clerk of Council
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090
CITY OF DUBLIN- Phone: 614 - 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 -410 -4490 Memo
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Marsha I. Grigsby, City Manager _
Date: June 9, 2011
Initiated By: Sara Ott, Senior Project Manager
Re: Ordinance 29 -11 -Ward District Boundary Review
Summary
At the May 23, 2011 meeting, Council Members approved a motion to designate the map referenced
as Scenario 1 as the preferred ward boundary map. This scenario maintains the existing ward
boundaries, which were established in May of 2001.
Staff has updated the proposed ordinance to include this map and text attachments. The ordinance
is drafted with emergency language so that it can be effective prior to the July 1 deadline, as
required by the Revised Charter.
Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of Ordinance 29 -11 by emergency at the June 13, 2011 City Council
meeting.
EXHIBIT A
RROCK RD
P
L�
a
lD
a
O
A
9
9
f f 4
SELL
D
z +
KW
HILL D0. LL "O
p P
a C
2010 Population Distribution
TO TTIE
C0.O-
BLVD
9
0 f O
- Z
n
o >°
% F RD
Dublin City Council Wards
A�
F�
O
m
0
9
D
SUM MIT VIEW RD
6
25] N
Hfl RD RD
tl RIGHi qL
�_ TllLLEft P.p
O
33
Scenario 1 12,000
Sg000
x,3]9 x1,91,900 2A17
Ward 4
Ward 1
°o a,000
23.W.
23.13%
"000
2 4,000
1334 .ze4Y$ _ ],s0
2,111
,.
gWard3
Ward2
0'
24.E
2),4%
.arll
War12 .arll .,14
p /� 6/8/2011
DdiQ,
Lenms2010
2,3]9
3,620 1,900 2,32]
Len -2000
7,554
7,816 8,461 ],64]
EXHIBIT A
WARD BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS
May 25, 2011
All ward boundary lines shall be contiguous with the centerline of public roads, rights -of -way,
streams, and rivers, unless otherwise noted by specific description, and elsewhere shall follow
existing county, township or corporate boundaries.
WARD 1
All population located in the incorporated area of the City of Dublin, Counties of Franklin and
Union, Township of Washington, State of Ohio, further described as being all of that property
situated south of Interstate 270 which lies east of Riverside Drive; all of that property situated
north of Interstate 270 which lies east of the Scioto River; and all of that property situated on the
west side of the Scioto River bounded as follows: North of Interstate 270 from the Scioto River
west to Post Road, then west with Post Road to Emerald Parkway, then north with Emerald
Parkway to Coffman Road, then north with Coffman Road to Brand Road, the northwest with
Brand Road to the easterly property line of 5584 Brand Road, then north with the easterly line of
5584 Brand Road to the northwest property corner of 7749 Haverhill Court, then east with the
north line of 7749 Haverhill Court and continuing east with the north property line of 7750
Haverhill Court and the north property line of 7741 Crawley Drive to the centerline of Crawley
Drive, then north with Crawley Drive to Heatherwood Lane, then east with Heatherwood Lane to
the extension of the north property line of 7598 Heatherwood Lane, then east with said extension
line and continuing with the north property line of 7598 Heatherwood Lane to the northeast
corner of said property, then north with the west property line of the Treetops at Brandon
condominium to the southeast property corner of 5805 Rushwood Drive, then west with the
south line of said property to the southwest corner of said property, then north with the west line
of said property to Rushwood Drive, then crossing Rushwood Drive to the east property line of
5808 Rushwood Drive, then with said east property line to the southeast property corner of 5814
Rushwood Drive, then with the east line of said property to the southwest property corner of
5525 Ashford Road, then with the northwesterly line of said property to the centerline of Ashford
Road, then north with Ashford Road to the extension of the west property line of 5610 Indian
Hill Road, then north with said property line extension and continuing with the west line of 5610
Indian Hill Road to the northwest corner of said property, then east with the north property line
of said property to the southeast property corner of 5629 Glenbervie Court, then north with the
east line of said property to the centerline of Memorial Drive, then northwest with Memorial
Drive to the Dunniker Park Drive, then north and east with Dunniker Drive to the Delaware
County line, then with the said County line east to the Scioto River. (Population 9,933)
WARD
All population located in the incorporated area of the City of Dublin, Counties of Franklin and
Union, Township of Washington, State of Ohio, further described as being all of that property
situated southeast of Interstate 270 which lies west of Riverside Drive; all of that property
situated west of Interstate 270 which lies south of Post Road/US 161; and all of that property
situated on the north side of Post Road bounded as follows: West of Emerald Parkway from Post
Road north to Coffman Park Drive, then west with Coffman Park Drive to the extension of the
north property line of 5800 Post Road, then northwest along said property line and continuing
northwest with the north property lines of 5868 Post Road, 5886 Post Road, and 5904 Post Road
to the northwest property corner of said 5904 Post Road, then in a northwesterly direction
traversing 5614 Post Road to the southernmost property corner of 5729 Tara Hill Drive, then
northwest with the south line of said property and continuing northwest with the south line of
6874 Ketchum Court to the southwest corner of said property, then north with the west line of
6874 Ketchum Court and continuing with an extension of the west line of said property to the
centerline of Ketchum Court, then north with Ketchum Court to Tara Hill Drive, then west with
Tara Hill Drive to the Muirfield Drive, then southwest with Muirfield Drive to Post Road.
(Population 11,436)
WARD
All population located in the incorporated area of the City of Dublin, Counties of Franklin,
Union and Delaware, Township of Washington, State of Ohio, further described as being all of
that property situated in Delaware County; all of that property situated north of Brand Road
which lies West of Muirfield Drive; all of that property situated north of Mitchell -Dewitt Road
which lies west of Hyland -Croy Road; and all of that property situated south of Brand Road and
east of Muirfield Drive bounded as follows: East of Avery Road from Brand Road south to the
extension of the south property line of 7400 Avery Road, then east with the south property line
of 7400 Avery Road and continuing east with the south line of 7631 Kestrel Way West, 7623
Kestrel Way West, 7606 Kestrel Way West and an extension of the south line of 7607 Kestrel
Way West to the centerline of Puffin Drive, then north with Puffin Drive to Kestrel Way East,
then east and north with Kestrel Way East to Cormorant Drive, then east with Cormorant Drive
to Muirfield Drive, then south with Muirfield Drive to Dublinshire Drive, then east with
Dublinshire Drive to Earlington Parkway, then south and east with Earlington Parkway to
Coffman Road, then north with Coffman Road to Brand Road, then northwest with Brand Road
to the easterly property line of 5584 Brand Road, then north with the easterly line of 5584 Brand
Road to the northwest property corner of 7749 Haverhill Court, then east with the north line of
7749 Haverhill Court and continuing east with the north property line of 7750 Haverhill Court
and the north property line of 7741 Crawley Drive to the centerline of Crawley Drive, then north
with Crawley Drive to Heatherwood Lane, then east with Heatherwood Lane to the extension of
the south property line of 7608 Heatherwood Lane, then east with said extension line and
continuing with the south property line of 7608 Heatherwood Lane to the southeast corner of
said property, then north with the west property line of the Treetops at Brandon condominium to
the southeast property corner of 5805 Rushwood Drive, then west with the south line of 5805
Rushwood Drive to the southeast corner of 5803 Rushwood Drive, then north with the east line
of 5803 Rushwood Drive to Rushwood Drive, then crossing Rushwood Drive to the east
property line of 5808 Rushwood Drive, then with said east property line to the southeast property
corner of 5814 Rushwood Drive, then with the east line of said property to the southernmost
property corner of 5533 Ashford Road, then with the southeasterly line of 5533 Ashford Road to
Ashford Road, then north with Ashford Road to the extension of the east property line of 5636
Indian Hill Road, then north with said extension and continuing with the east line of 5636 Indian
Hill Road to the northeast corner of said property, then east with the north property line of 5610
Indian Hill Road to the southeast property corner of 5629 Glenbervie Court, then north with the
east line of 5629 Glenbervie Court to Memorial Drive, then northwest with Memorial Drive to
the Dunniker Park Drive, then north and east with Dunniker Drive to the Delaware County line.
(Population 10,361)
2
WARD 4
All population located in the incorporated area of the City of Dublin, Counties of Franklin and
Union, Township of Washington, State of Ohio, further described as being that property
generally situated north of Post Road which lies west of Coffman Road and south of Brand Road
bounded as follows: West along Post Road from the corporate limits to Muirfield Drive, then
northeast with Muirfield Drive to Tara Hill Drive, then east with Tara Hill Drive to Ketchum
Court, then south with Ketchum Court to an extension of the east property line of 6862 Ketchum
Court, then south with the said property line extension and continuing with the east line of 6862
Ketchum Court to the southwest property corner of 6874 Ketchum Court, then southeast with the
south property line of 6874 Ketchum Court and continuing with the south line of 5729 Tara Hill
Drive to the southernmost property corner of said 5729 Tara Hill Drive, then in a southeasterly
direction traversing 5614 Post Road to the northwest property corner of 5904 Post Road, then
southeast with the north property line of 5904 Post Road and continuing with the north property
lines of 5886 Post Road, 5868 Post Road, 5800 Post Road, and an extension of the north line of
5800 Post Road to Coffman Park Drive, then west with Coffman Park Drive to Coffman Road,
then north with Coffman Road to Earlington Parkway, then west and north with Earlington
Parkway to Dublinshire Drive, then west with Dublinshire Drive to Muirfield Drive, then with
Muirfield Drive north to Cormorant Drive, then west with Cormorant Drive to Kestrel Way
West, then south and west with kestrel Way West to Puffin Drive, then south with Puffin Drive
to an extension of the north property line of 6092 Wynford Drive, then west with the extension
of the north line of 6092 Wynford Drive and continuing with the north property lines of 6100
Wynford Drive, 6108 Wynford Drive, 6116 Wynford Drive, 6118 St. Mel Circle, 6126 St. Mel
Circle, 6134 St. Mel Circle, 6142 St. Mel Circle, 6150 St. Mel Circle, and an extension of the
said north line of 6150 St. Mel Circle to Avery Road, the north with Avery Road to Brand Road,
then west with Brand Road to the City of Dublin corporate limits. (Population 9,974)
3
CITY OF DUBLIN-
Office of the City Manager
5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, OH 43017 -1090
Phone: 614- 410 -4400 • Fax: 614 -410 -4490
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Marsha 1. Grigsby, City Manager
Date: May 19, 2011
Initiated By: Sara G. Ott, Sr. Project Manager
Summary
Re: Ordinance 29-11 — Adjusting the Existing Ward Boundaries
Memo
In accordance with Section 9.04 of the Revised Charter for the City of Dublin, Ohio, City Council is
charged with reviewing ward boundaries no less than every 10 years. The last review of the ward
boundaries occurred in May, 2001. The language of the Revised Charter is attached for your
reference.
City staff has prepared four scenarios for ward boundaries for City Council's review and selection.
The scenarios attempt to ensure a relatively equal population division among the wards, based upon
2010 U.S. Census Bureau data, and minimize the splitting of neighborhoods between wards by using
major streets and subdivision boundaries as proposed ward boundaries. In addition to the scenario
maps, the first map attached shows the City's population change by ward from 2000 to 2010.
Further, staff developed population projections for potential residential development that could
occur within Dublin in the next ten years, focusing on approved preliminary development plans
within each Council ward. This information is listed on each map. Projected average household sizes
and residential vacancy rates by housing type (i.e. single- family detached, single- family attached and
multi - family) for the year 2020 were provided by McBride Dale Clarion for the 2007 Community
Plan demographic analysis. These assumptions were applied to the numbers of permitted housing
units remaining to be built in each development. Developments considered in this analysis
include Greystone Mews, Wyandotte Woods, Scioto Crossing /Sawmill Condos, and Deer Run
Estates (Franklin County portions) in Ward 1; Ballantrae, the Village at Coffman Park, and National
Church Residences (Avondale Woods) in Ward 2; Tartan West, Tartan Ridge, and Deer Run Estates
Delaware County portions) in Ward 3; and Oak Park in Ward 4. Staff also created separate
population projections for potential residential development within the Bridge Street Corridor (Wards
1 and 2), based on short-term residential market demand analysis and assumptions for development
capacity and phasing provided by Goody Clancy.
In summary, the scenarios are:
Scenario 1 — maintains existing ward boundaries
Scenario 2 — moves approximately 1.8% of the City's population from ward 2 to ward 4. The area to
be moved is labeled Area B.
Scenario 3 - moves approximately 3.7% of the City's population from ward 2 to ward 4. The areas to
be moved are labeled Area B and Area C.
Memo re. Ordinance 29 -11 — Adjusting Existing Ward Boundaries
May 19, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Scenario 4 — moves approximately 5.4% of the City's population from ward 3 to ward 4. The area to
be moved is labeled Area A. The scenario also moves 1.8% of the City's population
from ward 2 to ward 4 in the area labeled Area C.
Once a preferred scenario is identified, staff will prepare the necessary written description to be
added to the ordinance for the public hearing.
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council select a preferred scenario for inclusion in Ordinance 29-11 at the
May 23 City Council meeting and adopt the ordinance by emergency at the second reading /public
hearing on June 13, 2011.
RECORD OF ORDINANCES
Blank. Inc.
Ordinance No.
29 -11
AN ORDINANCE ADJUSTING THE EXISTING WARD
BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, AS REQUIRED
BY ARTICLE 9.04 OF THE REVISED CHARTER.
20
WHEREAS, the Revised Charter requires that no later than July 1, 2001, and no less
frequently than every ten years thereafter, Council shall divide or re- divide the City
into four wards of substantially equal population for the purpose of electing four ward
Council members at the next regular municipal election; and
WHEREAS, the 2010 federal census data has now been provided to the City of
Dublin; and
WHEREAS, City Council has convened to discuss the proposed ward adjustments,
based upon population changes to the existing wards, as substantiated by the 2010
U.S. census data.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin,
of its elected members concurring, that:
Section 1 . The corporate limits of the City of Dublin be and the same hereby is
divided into the wards as bounded and described as Scenario _ in Exhibit " A "
with the respective population indicated, pursuant to Article 9.04 of the Revised
Charter.
Section 2 . The Boards of Elections of Franklin, Delaware and Union counties, upon
receipt of a certified copy of this Ordinance, are hereby authorized and directed to
accept the wards enumerated herein for all purposes of election, as authorized by the
Revised Charter of the City of Dublin, Ohio.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the earliest date permitted by law.
Passed this day of 2011.
Mayor - Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
Clerk of Council
Excerpt from the Revised Charter of the City of Dublin, Ohio
9.04. WARDS AND BOUNDARIES.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF WARDS.
No later than July 1, 2001 and no less frequently than every ten years thereafter, Council
shall, by legislation, divide or redivide the City into four wards for the purpose of electing four
ward Council members at the next regular municipal election. The division or re- division of the
City into four wards shall provide for substantially equal population in each ward.
(b) WARD BOUNDARIES.
All wards shall be bounded, to the extent possible, by county lines, streets, alleys, avenues,
public grounds, canals, water - courses, municipal boundary lines, center lines of platted streets or
railroads, or lot lines of platted subdivisions.
(c) EFFECT OF RE- DIVISION.
Re- division of the City into wards shall not terminate or otherwise affect the unexpired
terms of ward Council members; however, at succeeding elections, ward Council members shall
be elected from the wards as reapportioned or re- established under this Section.
(d) CENSUS.
Council shall have the power to cause a census of the City to be taken if it determines a
census is necessary for the proper apportionment of the City's wards. Council may authorize
officials and employees of the City, independent contractors or state or federal government
agencies to conduct the census under the control and direction of Council.
RRDCK RD
P
L�
a
O
L
P
Y
's
City Council Wards
Population Change
Census 2000 - Census 2010
Date: 5/9/2011
Ward 3
a
Year Population 1% of Total
2000 8,461 26.9%
2010 10,361 24.8%
<1
TD«r MpRE DR 9
O
Ward 4
Year
Population
% of Total
2000
7,647
1 24.3%
2010
1 9,974
1 23.9%
6
MEro° m °
' C 9
Z
SUMMIT VIEW RD
a O
O R Z
O �
; O t 746
267
B
JR W Sjy�rR�_� R9 ND OH M '9YD R
� yD e
sr o
TVLLER RD
_
Existing Wards -2000 Population Existing Wards -2010 Population
12,000 '
10,000 2,379 —3,620 1,900 2,327
8,000
Ward4 WRrdl Ward4 Wardl
20.3% ,24:m — 6,000 . — 23.9% 23.8Y
a 4,000 7,647
vv 2,000 — "'-
0 - - --- Ward3 Ward2
Wardl Ward2 Ward3 Ward4 24.8% 27.4%
Census2010 2,379 3,620 1,900 2,327
j Census20001 7,554 1 7,816 1 8,461 1 7,647
Ward 1
Year
Population
% of Total
2000
7,554
1 24.0%
2010
9,933
1 23.8%
RRpCK RO
P
Year
O
1% of Total
G
9,974
9
2020
9�
22.5%
BSC 2020*
n
A
1 21.6%
O
P
a
EJ
A
2010 10,361 24.8%
020
2 11,623 25.5%
R
BSC 2020* 11,623 24.5% oece mo
~ m m
9
Z
O O
J p p0.
O
O
*rea _ ` ]45i T U< 25]i
Ward 4
Year
O
1% of Total
G
9,974
9
2020
9�
22.5%
BSC 2020*
1 10,245
1 21.6%
4
A
2010 10,361 24.8%
020
2 11,623 25.5%
R
BSC 2020* 11,623 24.5% oece mo
~ m m
9
Z
O O
J p p0.
O
O
*rea _ ` ]45i T U< 25]i
Ward 4
Year
IPopulation
1% of Total
2010
9,974
23.9%
2020
10,245
22.5%
BSC 2020*
1 10,245
1 21.6%
D
sEt�
Scenario 1
Existing Ward Boundaries
Date: 5/13/2011
SUMMIT VIEW RD
6
Ward 1
Year
Population
%of Total
2010
9,933
23.8%
2020
10,458
22.9%
BSC 2020*
11,428
24.1%
TULLE0. RD
D
3
:!
Scenario -2010 Population
Ward4 Ward
23.9% 23.8%
Ward Ward
24.8% 27.4%
H Pi
Scenario 1 - 2020 Projected Population Scenario 1 - BSC 2020* Projected Population
Ward Ward Ward Ward
22.5. 22.9. 21.6% 24.1%
Ward Ward Ward Ward2
25.5. 29.2% 24.5.
29.9.
RaOCK RO
P
L�
a
d``
1•
E1
O
G
9
9�
f 4
i 1 a
n
A
O
P
a
tl •
i
�M O0.E DR 9
O
Ward 4
Year
JPopulation
1% of Total
2010
10,721
25.7%
20 20
10,992
24 .1%
BSC 2020*
10,992
23.1%
Scenario 2 - 2010 Population
Ward 4 Ward 1
25.N 23.8%
Ward 3 Ward 2
24.8% 25.6%
S O P
sR�ts `"o
1
Scenario 2
Area B - 747 (1.8%)
From Ward 2 to Ward 4
Date: 5/13/2011
Scenario2 -2020 Projected Population
Ward4
Ward
A�
22.9%
O0.
Ward
25.5%
F
N B
22.9%
BSC 2020*
11,428
O
Pr \ ^ CpC
m
O
9
Z
G
O0.
O
C
O
PS
_.
N
Scenario2 -2020 Projected Population
Ward4
Ward
24.1%
22.9%
Ward
Ward
25.5%
27.5%
SUMMIT VIEW RD �
6
Ward 1
Year
Population
%of Total
2010
9,933
23.8%
2020
10,458
22.9%
BSC 2020*
11,428
24.1%
Scenario 2 - BSC 2020* Projected Population
Ward4
Ward
23.1%
24.1%
Ward
Ward
24.5%
28.3%
D
P
O CKY,Y
TV LLER Rfi
W BRID GE ST
N
n
x
MEigO PI J
WY
RIN G5R0 O
Z
C
C J J�J
RROCK RO
P
L�
a
d
O
S�
9
9 ,.
f 4
rte. y E f
1
Area C �
w eRID CE ST
Ward 2
Year Population %of Total
2010 9,995 24.0%
2020 11,747 25.7%
W
BSC 2020* 12,637 26:6% W :
O
sRLt'��
SUMMIT VIEW RD �
Ward 1
Year
Population
%of Total
2010
9,933
23.8%
2020
10,458
22.9%
BSC 2020*
11,428
24.1%
z
fl4 HILL DR LL Or-
Area B
p ULLE0.0.D
Rlrvm 0
TUTT�E. �
C0.0
swD
6
f
0
X
i 1 a
A
O
P
a
Ward 3 1 —
Scenario 3
Area B - 747 (1.8%)
Area C - 811 (1.9%)
From Ward 2 to Ward 4
Date: 5/13/2011
2010
1
10,361
24.80
2010
2020
27.4%
11,623
25.5%
25.9%
BSC2020*
11,803
11,623
24.5%
oR
e ta
opc D
_ e
C e 9
Z
J 0 00.
0
i
0
0 45i
Ut(YMIJ0.E
Y
ea A
Ofl
t ( Al
O gp \NSy
Ward 4
Year
Population
% of Total
2010
11,415
27.4%
2020
11,803
25.9%
BSC 2020*
11,803
Scenario -2010 Population
Ward 4 Ward 1
27.4% 23.8%
Ward
Ward
24.0%
24.8%
Scenario - 2020 Projected Population Scena ri o 3 - BSC 2020* Projected Population
Ward4 Ward
25.9. 22.9.
Ward Ward
25.5% 25.7%
Ward4 Ward
24.9. 24.1.
Ward Ward
24.5% 26.6.
RRDCK RD
P
L�
a
d
3}:.
0
L
9
9�
4
i
i
n
Year
A
2010
2020
OSIC 2020*
RRgND RD
71J <,, 00.E Ofl
Ward 3
Scenario 4
Area A - 2232 (5.4%)
From Ward 3 to Ward 4
Area B - 747 (1.8%)
From Ward 2 to Ward 4
Date: 5/13/2011
Ward 4
8,129
19.5%
9,391
20.6% a,
9,391
19.8%
2020
m
29.0%
- m
' 9
13,224
Z
c a�
= Area A
O
Ward 4
Year
lPopulation
%of Total
2010
12
31.1%
2020
13,224
29.0%
BSC 2020*
13,224
27.8%
D
sELls �"
SUMMIT VIEW RD �
z
Ward 1
Year
Population
%of Total
2010
9
23.8%
2020
10,458
22.9%
BSC 2020*
11,428
24.1%
z
4 HILL DR £
D £
` PF. RIMETB Dq ��
W 80.10 GE ST
c.
MEIAD PL
�µW �
s
Rw csnu
1 -
i
Scenario 4 - 2010 Population
Ward 1
Ward 4
23.13%
31.1%
Ward 2
Ward 25.6%
19.5%
Ward 2
Year Population % of Total
2010 10,689 21.6%
2020 12,558
BSC 2020* 13.448 28.3%
TJLLE0. RD
0 D
x
Scenario 4 - 2020 Projected Population Scenario 4 -BSC 2020* Projected Population
Ward4 Ward Wara4 Ward
29.OY 22.9% 27.8% 24.1%
Ward Ward Ward Ward
20.6% 21'5% 19.8% 28.3%