Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/10/1990 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Prior to the regularly scheduled meeting, at approximately 6:45 P.M., Chief Ferrell, Lt. Geis and Officer Moody, along with Corporal Steve Bollinger as well as Franklin County Sheriff, Earl Smith's, Chief Deputy, presented to members of Council a canine demonstration, stressing the value of a police service dog as a public relations tool as well as for other, more conventional police matters. Mayor Rozanski called the meeting of Council to order at 7:38 P.M. Mayor Rozanski introduced Mr. John Bishop and Mr. David Sydnor, Scout leaders of eleven young men from Den 7, Pack 299, who led the Pledge of Allegiance. Mayor Rozanski noted that the young men were working on the requirements for a citizenship badge. Chief Ferrell reported that he and Mr. Hansley, on the previous Wednesday, had represented the City of Dublin at the U.S. Department of Transportation luncheon where various private organizations, military groups, etc. were honored. Dublin was the only City to win the 70% Plus Club award. Based on two surveys conducted over 74% of the citizens of Dublin wore safety belts, hence the award. Chief Ferrell presented a plaque to the Council and to the citizens of Dublin. Ro11 Call Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Campbell, Mrs. King, Ms. Maurer, Mayor Rozanski, Ms. Maurer, Mr. Strip and Mr. Sutphen. Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also present as were members of City Staff. Mr. Sutphen moved to approve the minutes of the November 19, 1990 meeting of Council. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Mr. Sutphen moved to approve the minutes of the November 20, 1990 meeting of Council. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Correspondence There was no objection regarding an application for a D3 liquor permit for Biddie's Inc., 76-78 S. High Street, Dublin. Comments from Citizens Mr. Jack Chaisson. Representing the Emergency Services Committee, requested an update on progress made with regarding the November 20, 1990 meeting(s) before the Franklin County Commissioners and the Delaware County Commissioners, and the resulting mandamus action. Mr. Campbell referred to a recent "Letter to the Editor" in a local news- paper, and responded by saying that he wanted to make it abundantly clear that the City has nothing to gain financially, land-wise, etc. by the votes of Council members on this issue; that the total effort has been an attempt to take the first steps in achieving unified fire and emergency services in the City of Dublin. Since the Law Director had to leave the meeting for a short time, Mayor Rozanski suggested that further discussion on this issue be deferred until the Law Director and City Manager were present. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 1() , 1990 19 Page Two Mr. Chaisson said to Mr. Campbell that the majority of Concord/Dublin residents commend Dublin City Council's stand on the issue. Ordinance No. 53-90 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on a 51.387 Acre Tract Located on the West Side of Wilcox Road at the Inter- section of Tuttle Road and Wilcox Road, South of Rings Road. Public Hearing. Mayor Rozanski announced that the Public Hearing would be rescheduled for the Council meeting on December 17, 1990. He noted that it was advertised as a Public Hearing in the newspapers, but that the notices of the Public Hearing did not get mailed out to the adjoining property owners. Ordinance No. 107-90 - Ordinance Amending Certain Sections of the Compen- sation Plan. (Ordinance No. 17-90). Second Reading. Mrs. King said that in discussions about a year ago regarding the Compen- sation Plan, that several Council members had expressed concern about the fact that the bottom of the pay range is always raised as well as the top of the range. She further said that it was her understanding that an amendment would be provided, responding to that expressed concern. Mrs. King offered to work with the Director of Personnel to provide that amendment, reflecting that change. Mr. Harding said that he felt that what was prepared is consistent with the City's past practice; that most communities usually do index both the minimum and maximum of the pay ranges, adjustments being made due to inflation. Mayor Rozanski said that he agreed with Mrs. King, pointing out that conceivably a clerical/secretarial person, for example, newly hired, could be making a salary very close to a person who had worked for the City for a year. Mr. Harding said that that should not be; provided the Department/Division Head provides the merit increase consistent with the performance of the employee, then there really should not be a compression problem in the bottom aspects of the pay range. During the past year, Mr. Harding said, the average raise for a fully effective performer, which is level three of a five level performance structure, was about 7% to 8%; that very effective, level four, was around 8% to 10%, and exceptional was around 10% to 12%. Mr. CAmpbell wanted to emphasize some points that had been previously made. Mr. Campbell said that he had no trouble or concern with appropriate raises for current personnel, based upon merit and inflation, etc., those factors which need to be considered. Mr. Campbell again said that he had no trouble with current employees achieving raises; however, if all the brackets are bumped, then some of the incentive is taken away for existing employees when new employees are hired and come in at a salary range not much lower then an employee who has been employed by the City for some time. Ms. Maurer said that she felt that the City should meet the inflation increase, both on a humanitarian basis, and due to the fact that the City is trying to get first quality employees and not lose them to the private sector or to other better paying government sectors. Mr. Strip requested that Mr. Harding prepare for Council members, in written form, a breakdown of how many staff members got 10% increases last year, how many got 8% or 6%, or whatever. Mr. Harding said that the 6% increase recommendation "across the board" was because in the past the philosophical objective was to, since the unionized personnel are to receive 6%, that the non-unionized personnel should get a 6% increase, the objective being to be equitable. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MiriUteS of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D N EGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Page Three Mr. Amorose also expressed a concern, saying that he felt that with the total City benefit package offered that the true inflation rate to a City employee is not necessarily 6.6%. He also recommended taking into consideration economic conditions at the present time. Mr. Harding said that he would have an amendment read for the next meeting of Council, basically adjusting the minimum of the salary structure. There will be a third and final reading of the Ordinance at the Council meeting on December 17, 1990. Mrs. King also requested information regarding the percentages in each different category of merit raise in the last year, so that members of Council would have the inflation factor as well as the merit factor. Ordinance No. 109-90 - Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into a Contract to Purchase Park Land in the Northeast Quadrant. Second Reading. Ther will be a third reading of the Ordinance on December 17, 1990. Mr. Smith and Mr. Hansley returned to the meeting. Mr. Chaisson requested an update on the mandamus action which was passed by Council on November 20, 1990. Mr. Smith said that a writ of mandamus has been filed in the Ohio Supreme Court against the Delaware County Commissioners to in fact do what the City believes they are bound by law to do. The Delaware County Commissioners have agreed to sign a motion to expedite before the Ohio Supreme Court. Mr. Smith said that the case is filed, they have waived service, they have agreed to accept service, they have agreed to file the motion to expedite so everything is moving on a "fast track". Ordinance No. 122-90 - Ordinance to Accept the Lowest/Best Bid for Ditch Rehabilitation on the East Side of S.R. 257 (Riverside Drive). First Reading. (E). Mr. Amorose introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Willis announced that there are MBE requirements on this project because the City is utilizing State Issue II funds. After reviewing the bids, Mr. Willis said that staff would be recommending that Council authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with the Righter Company at a cost of $132,335.00 for the ditch cleaning on S.R. 257. Mr. Willis said that the work will be entirely on the east side of S.R. 257 from S.R. 161 north to the north Dublin corporation Line. The work is to include ditch cleaning, as well as some culvert replacement at the street intersections and some of the driveways through the area. He also said that most of the area where the work will be done will remain as an open ditch, and also noted that there is one area where, because of slope constrictions and width restrictions, that the ditch had to be enclosed for about 200 feet in order to provide a safe area. Mr. Amorose said that he had some concerns about the ditch work that was done on Bright Road where loose stone was used and has actually already kicked away from the berm. Mr. Willis said that the nature of the two roads is significantly different. He said that S.R. 257 is a road that was constructed to some standard some number of years ago; that Bright Road appears to have been a road that seems to have grown up from a path to what it is today; that Bright Road may never have had properly installed ditches along it. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DAVT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Page Four It was noted that the ditch cleaning is a maintenance job and that the whole purpose of it is to allow water to get to the outlets, the cross streams and so forth and stay off of the pavement. Mr. Willis said that the work can go ahead in the winter; that it can go ahead in all but the wettest of weather, and that so long as the ground is not frozen that the contractor will proceed as soon after the company and the City enter into a contract. Responding to a question from Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Willis said that for this project there are two sources of funding - State Issue II funds (approximately $79,000.00) being administered through the District 3 Integrating Committee through MORPC with the remainder coming from Dublin funds. Mr. Amorose moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Mrs. King and Mr. Campbell questioned the true emergency nature of this Ordinance, Mr. Campbell saying that he felt that perhaps it is a self- induced emergency to some point. It was noted that this was the second time the project had gone out for bids. Mr. Campbell said that he felt that Council needs to be critical to make certain that Council is not passing self-induced emergencies, and that if it is a true emergency, then there must be careful explanations as to why it is being passed as an emergency measure. Vote on the motion to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, no; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, y ; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sut~_Iher, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Ordinance No. 123-90 - Ordinance to Raise Speed Limit West of Wilcox Road on Rings Road and all of Avery Road South of Valley Stream Drive. (E). First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Hansley summarized, noting that when this land was annexed to Dublin, the reading of the statute said that the speed limit had to be lowered because it was within the corporate Limits of Dublin, and had to be lowered to 35 MPH. Subsequently, Mr. Willis found a statute that says that a City Council can, after giving due regard to the circumstance, raise the speed limit. Mr. Hansley said that staff's recommendation would be to raise the speed limit to 45 MPH with the understanding that it can be lowered in the future to 35 MPH as development occurs or if there are a number of accidents or speeding problems. Mr. Strip expressed a concern regarding the possible changes in speed limits and a possible resulting confusion for a driver. He also suggested that a sign be used or some similar posting, to indicate to the driver that a speed limit has been revised. Mr. Campbell had the following comments: 1. Concern regarding this Ordinance be treated as emergency legislation without allowing residents an opportunity to voice their opinions. 2. Speed Limits in Ohio are prima facie evidence of something that is unreasonable for the conditions, being the presumption of violating the speed limit by going in exceds of conditions. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the Council meeting on Monday, December 17, 1990. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DAYi N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Page Five Mr. Hansley said that he felt that the complaints, if the Ordinance is passed at this meeting, will be from nearby residentis who are glad that the speed limit was lowered and that the City is aggressively enforcing that lowered speed Limit. Resolution No. 53-90 - Resolution Approving the Report of the Assessment Equalization Board - Muirfield Drive Connection. (E). First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Resolution. Ms. Smith requested that Resolution 53-90 and Ordinance No. 124-90 be passed as emergencies, indicating that construction of the Muirfield Drive connection be kept on the "fast track". He indicated also that all of the take Litigation has been filed, and that bids will be awarded shortly on this project. Ms. Maurer moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Ordinance No. 124-90 - Ordinance to Proceed to Open, Construct and Improve a Public Street - Muirfield Drive Connection. (E). First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Mr. Hansley commended and thanked the volunteer citizens who served on the Assessment Equalization Board - Mr. Ron Jezerinac, Mrs. Kristine Hess, and Mr. David Wolfe. Ordinance No. 125-90 - Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into a New Contract with the Law Director. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Hansley reported that the City Charter requires that the Law Director's contract be renewed on an annual basis; that this contract is identical to last year's contract excpet that it is being recommended that the compensation be increased from $60 per hour to $85 per hour to more : reflect the market value. He noted that the hourly rate has not been adjusted for at least four or five years. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the Council meeting on December 17, 1990. Other Recommendation from Public Service Committee Regarindg Clover Court Drainage Situation. Mrs. King moved that the City Council formally accept the recommendations of the Public Service Committee of Council as presented in a report for the Committee, dated October 21, 1990. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting D YT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 December 10, 1990 Held 19 Page Six Mr. Strip reported regarding a request from the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau for funds, noting that the Bureau had requested $44,000.00 in additional funds five to six months ago at which time Council allocated approximately $21,000.00 of the requested funds. The request was reinstated for some $22,000.00, and the Finance Committee took that under advisement. He said that he suggested to the other members of the Committee that Council allocate $5,000.00, provided that the funds be earmarked solely for the printing of the brochure. Mr. Amorose noted that the Convention and Visitors Bureau receives approximately $125,000.00/year from the hotel/motel tax, and that they should try to live within that budget. Mr. Strip said that the Finance Committee had received 10 applications for bed tax funds in 1991 thus far, and that there was not an application from the Convention and Visitors Bureau. It was requested that those applications received be forwarded to the rest of the members of Council by the Clerk of Council. Mr. Strip noted that this year the Convention and Visitors Bureau would be receiving 25% of $550,000 to $600,000 which would put them in the $135,000 range. He also noted that by reading over some of the requests of the people requesting monies from the hotel/motel tax have gotten a little aggressive and ambitious in their requests. Comments from Staff Mr. Smith 1. Reported that he had received word that on the following morning at 8:30 A.M. there would be a hearing before the Honorable Judge Frank Reda with respect to the recent 733 acre annexation, seeking a temporary restraining order. 2. Suggested that Council consider appointing a Charter Revision Committee in 1991, noting that John Gotherman has suggested that normally after a Charter has been in place for three, four or five years that said Charter should be reviewed to see if any changes should be made. Ms. Maurer suggested that if a Charter Revision Committee is appointed, that the City provide them with a budget and hire Mr. Gotherman to advise the committee. Mrs. Metz 1. Reported that the City received an A-1 rating from Moody's. 2. Said that Prudential-Bache was the low bidder on both the Series A and B bonds at an interest rate of 6.787 which is an excellent rate and that it actually translates more to between a AA and a AAA rating. Reported that a recent letter indicating the typical rate would be for an Al rating for a 20 year issue, that the normal rate would be 7.08. Ms. Jordan 1. AL1 the seats have been filled on the Mayor's Task Force on Child Care, and the first meeting will be on January 15, 1991. Chief Ferrell 1. Reported that the Council Public Safety Committee had met recently for an update on the progress of the Dublin Justice Center and that everything is moving on schedule. 2. Noted that it was expected that there would be approximately 300 applicants for police officer taking the written examination. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Page Seven Council Roundtable Discussion Mrs. King 1. Asked when Avery Road will be open to two way traffic on four lanes. Mr. Willis reported that the construction on Avery Road is nearing completion; that the northbound lanes could be opened except for one "holdup", that being the operation of the two signals that are being installed at the present time. Noted that staff has been working with the electric company to bring the power to the signals, but have not been able to provide the City with a definite date. Said he did not feel comfortable in opening Avery Road to four lanes of traffic until the signals are in operation. With regard to the possibility of posting a policeman at the corner during peak hours, Mr. Foegler noted that a concern of the police would be the width of the road and how early in the evening it is getting dark, which results in a dangerous situation to try to control manually. Mr. Foegler said that in his conversations with the electric company, that the electric company has offered to get quick authorization to get above ground electric for the temporary signalization of the intersection. He did indicate that staff's concern was that if above ground service was put in that underground lines would never materialize. 2. Noted that she felt that there needs to be a light at the intersection of Bright Road and S.R. 257 3. Stated that at the scene of a recent traffic accident, at night, she had noticed that a police officer directing traffic could not be seen very easily as he was not wearing an illuminating vest. Chief Ferrell said that he had been made aware of the situation and appropriate steps had been taken. 4. Announced that the second recycling center at the Municipal Service Complex would be open at 9:00 to 12:00 noon on Saturday, December 15, 1990. Mr. Amorose 1. Commented on some possible confusion regarding the Agreement of Intent between the City of Dublin and Ashland Chemical Company regarding improvements along the Blazer Parkway Boulevard. Said that the that the improvements had been completed except for the landscaping. Reported that City Staff feels that there was no intent to do any landscaping as part of the imrpovement of Blazer Parkway. In going back through various written records Mr. Amrose said that in the 1985 agreement landscaping was mentioned (Exhibit A) which says that the improvement includes the building of Blazer Parkway to the width of 36' and the installation of curb and gutters, lighting, walkways, and the extension of the existing water main to be installed past part of the project. "Also mounding and land- scaping of the street to improve the overall safety and appearance." Wondered if it had been the intent of Council and the City, as part of the inducement agreement and the documentation that there is a street tree planting program. Mr. Amorose said that the issue is that Ashaland Chemical feels that that was part of the overall agreement that, as part of the street improvements, that they had intended for the entire street to be landscaped in accordance with the drawings that were submitted early on in the process and referred back to on several occasions (Jim Bassett drawings). RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting. Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK 00. FORM NO. 70148 Held December 17, 1990 19 Page Eight It was noted that there was 1.3 million dollars budgeted for the project, and that approximately $750,000 at present has been spent. Mr. Hansley said that he has not been approached by Ashland Chemical in reference to adding a large amount of additional landscaping; that Mr. Amorose brought it to his attention for the first time at a Public Service Committee meeting a couple of days ago. Mr. Hansley noted that the Inducement Agreement went on to say that the final design plan would be done by the City with put from Ashland, and that they would get to see the final plans and have input into that process. At the time, he said, Mr. Bassett was un- available, and Mr. Olausen did do the design work for the City. Those plans were presented to Ashland and no additional landscaping was requested at that time. The Bassett plan was not part of the Inducement Agreement that was given to Council. Mr. Hansley noted that the City had agreed to restore the right-of-way to the same way that it was before; that Ashland could hire the work to be done and the City would pay the bill for the restoration, not for additional Landscaping. Following additional discussion, Mr. Strip asked that the same information and documentation be made available to all members of Council so that an informed and intelligent decision can be made regarding the issue. 2. Commended the Code Enforcement staff members, noting that the staff was doing a good job in not an easy situation. Ms. Maurer 1. Will not be at the next Council meeting, but will be at a training meeting in Washington. 2. Wished all a Merry Christmas and Happy Hannukkah. 3. Need to meet to make the appointments to the boards, commissions and committees for 1991, as well as meet to evaluate the two employees for whom Council is responsible. 4. Announced a meeting of the Development Procedures Committee on Wednesday, December 12, 1990 at 5:00 P.M. Would like to know when and what the next step in the Capital Improve- ment Projects process will be. Mr. Foegler said that at the request of the Land Use Committee, that the summary of all the projects in the Capital Improvement Program as had been prepared by staff had been distributed to members of Council. Staff, he said, would request that Council members review that List to determine whether or not they believe some other project(s) should be added. Mrs. Metz is preparing the financial report to go along with staff's recommendations. Mr. Foegler said that staff would like members of Council consider the staff's recommendations for the five year Capital Improvement Program, and that then Council would schedule a Public Hearing to review the recommended program and solicit input from the public. Hopefully, he said that Public Hearing would be held in the early part of January. Input will also be solicited from the Planning Commission members. The time frame would indicate that the Five Year Capital Improvement Program would be brought before Council for final adopting in late January. Ms. Maurer said that she felt that there should be some type of rating process that members of Council can apply some time before the Public Hearing. RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held December 10, 1990 19 Page Nine Mr. Foegler said that Council members will have prioritization with the recommended program; that staff will indicate those things, reasons, etc. which were used to prioritize the projects. 5. Noted that the newspaper had reported the fact that all members of Council had attended the National League of Cities Congress of Cities Conference in Houston the preceding week. She said that she felt that each member of Council had learned many interesting and stimulating things from seminars as well as from Council members from municipalities around the United States. Mr. Hansley noted that several major programs that the Dublin City Council has recently undertaken have come from ideas presented at past meetings, such as goal setting, police accreditation, and hotel/motel bed tax. Mr. Strip 1. On behalf of Council offered congratulations to Nathan Urban on his recent selection as a Rhodes Scholar. 2. Noted that there seems to be confusion regarding the bridge situation and that accurate information needs to get accurate information out to the public regarding proposed location, timetable, etc. Mr. Foegler reported that staff did update the Land Use Planning Committee on the status of the Northeast Quadrant Area Plan, specifically the Bright Road area portion of that plan. He also noted that there have been some informal meetings with the residents' association in that area. Mr. Foegler said that staff has prepared a draft of that plan and hopefully will have a draft of the Bright Road area study to Council within a week to ten days. He said that public meetings will be scheduled for input from interested residents with staff being available to respond to questions from those residents. Mr. Strip suggested that appropriate civic associations, neighborhood associations be placed on a mailing list so that they are notified of any meetings. Mayor Rozanski 1. Said that it would be helpful to him if Council members could get an inventory of all vehicles owned by the City such as the age of the vehicle, mileage, what department they are used in, etc. 2. Asked Mr. Willis about the striping of Dublin Road from downtown to Frantz Road; who did it, why was a double yellow line painted down the entire length of the road, etc. Mr. Willis said that he would report back regarding the above. 2. Wondered why at Avery Road and Perimeter Drive a span wire was used for the signalization rather than an arm installation. Suggested that perhaps Council might consider legislation that would require that any signalization in the City be massed arm installations rather than the span wire type across the road. Mrs. King moved to adjourn to Executive Session at 9:35 P.M. for the purpose of discussing personnel matters. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. ~ ~ ayor - Presi~g Officer Clerk of Co ncil