Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/1990 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DA N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 i Mayor Jan Rozanski called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council to order at 7:35 P.M. on Monday, October 15, 1990. Mr. Strip led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of council present were: Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Amorose, Mr. Campbell, Mrs. King, Ms. Maurer, and Mr. Strip. Mr. Sutphen arrived at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Stephen Smith, Law Director, were also present. Mr. Amorose moved to approve the minutes of the October 1, 1990 meeting. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Correspondence Comments from Citizens (Items not on the Agenda) 1. Mr. Jack Chaisson Mr. Chaisson, speaking on behalf of the Emergency Services Committee said that he had recently appeared at a meeting of the Washington Township Trustees, urging them to support the efforts of the Emergency Services Committee by communicating with the Franklin County Board of Commissioners to urge quick action for the approval of the Ordinance recently passed at the last City Council meeting regarding the re-drawing of the township lines in portions of Concord Township. He noted also that a petition is being circulated amoung Washington Township Trustees regarding the same issue. Mr. Chaisson commented that the Emergency Services Committee of Concord/Dublin has written a letter to the Franklin County Commis- sioners urging quick action. 2. Mr. David Wilt, representing the Committee Against the Boundary Change, referred to a letter from the committee asking that the City Council to rescind the request to have the boundary line changes. The reasons for the request are summarized as follows: 1. Could cause a problem in getting the fire levies passed on November 6, 1990, in both townships (Concord and Washington). 2. The safety reasons supporting the change were not valid and there are other alternatives that have not been allowed to be presented in a logical and forthright way with the public. 3. The costs that would be incurred. Suggested after the election that Council appoint a citizens committee to examine all of the issues involved in the boundary change, includin several non-fire issues. Suggested also that if there is to be a boundary change that the people in the area affected have a right to vote on it. 3. Mr. Bill Uttley, a resident of Concord Township said that he agreed with Mr. Wilt. Mr. Uttley also requested clarification regarding funding for the proposed community/recreation center. He indicated that the ballot language does not state that there will be no new taxes. Mr. Hansley replied that the ballot language is required by State statute. He siad that as long as the City has sufficient income tax revenue that the bonds will be retired from source. Mr. Hansley said that legally and technicall the City Council will always have the authority to impose a tax, and that the citizens will need to trust the City Council's "track record" in that regard as they did in the spring of this year. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BL4NK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Hela October 15, 1990 19 Page Two Mr. Hansley also noted that Council has said that should funds not be available, that the project may have to be phased. 3. Mrs. Barbara Snyder on behalf of the Emergency Services Committee, said that the committee supports the Concord fire levy and want the levy to be passed, being desirous of Concord Township having increased fire services. 4. Mr. Wilt said that he did not feel that, given the Council passed the ordinance as an emergency measure, that the voters would had voted against the issue previously were not given adequate opportunity to express their opinions, there not being an adequate forum for discussion provided. He also said that he felt there should be a public vote on the issue. Mr. Strip noted that representatives of the Concord Township Trustees and Concord Fire Department had been at two Council meetings, express- ing their opinions regarding the issue, making presentations at two Council meetings. Ordinance No. 89-90 - Ordinance Accepting an Annexation of 733± Acres from Washington Township to the City of Dublin. Third Reading. mr. Stephen Smith noted that there have been inquiries from a number of people questioning whether or not the Ordinance could be passed as an emergency. Mr. Smith said that he had responded to those inquiries by saying that it has been the policy, unwritten though it may be, of the Dublin City Council not to pass legislation on annexations or zoning mattters as an emergency measure(s). He also noted that a situation had evolved in Washington Township in which an applicant involved in a rezoning had been granted the rezoning on the condition that he would not apply for a liquor permit. Subsequently a liquor permit has been applied for, noting that the application has been heard by the Department of Liquor Control but has not been ruled upon, the problem being whether the application will fall under the township quota system or the City of Dublin's quote system, that being dependent upon the tuning of the passage of this ordinance and subsequent completed annexation of the 733 acres from Washington Township to the City of Dublin. A summary of Mr. L. Eberhart's, a Washington Township Trustee, comments is as follows: 1. In early 1989 an application was made for a party house and a picnic grounds involving approximately 7 acres in the township. 2. The petition for the change of zoning was heard by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) who turned it down because they felt that it was not compatible with the rural/residential neightborhood of the area. 3. The application was heard by the Washington Township Zoning Commission Objections were raised by the residents of the neighborhood. The application was not approved by the township zoning commission. 4. The request was then heard by the Washington Township Trustees. 5. It is very rare that the trustees overrule the zoning commission. 6. At the hearing objections from the residents were again raised. 7. The applicant at that time indicated that he would be willing "to go back to the drawing board" and come back and try to answer all of the objections. 8. The matter was tabled and at a subsequent meeting the applicant came back and agreed to a total of thirteen deed restrictions. 9. Those deed restrictions included no application for a liquor permit; no music after 10:00 P.M.; the park would close no later than 11:00 P.M., etc. 10. The provisions of the deed restrictions appeared to satisfy those persons who had previously objected. 11. The Washington Township Trustees approved the application, with the deed restrictions being spelled out in great detail. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 i Page Three 12. The deed restrictions were prepared by the township attorney and filed with Franklin County. 13. In August of this year, unbeknownst to the township trustees, the applicant filed for a liquor permit. 14. At the present time it appears that the caterers and/or users of the party house provide their own liquor. 15. Operating with a Dl, D2, D3, etc. liquor permit, with the applicant in total control, would mean that they would have the opportunity to operate anything from a beer and wine carryout to a night club. 16. The Ohio Revised Code, the manner in which the Liquor Control Board reaches their decition, township zoning ordinances and deed restrictions are not applicable. 17. They do, however, take into consideration misrepresentation and the trustees do feel that there has been misrepresentation. 18. This same applicant also has an industrial park contiguous to this party house and picnic ground. After the plans and zoning were approved for this industrial park, one of the buildings became un- occupied and the applicant requested that this office building be converted into an indoor golf-type facility, and one of the deed restrictions was that there would be no application for a liquor permit. There is now a liquor permit for this facility. 19. The Washington Township Trustees opposed the application with an extensive hearing before the Liquor Control Board, but the applica- tion was granted. 20. Council, with action tonight, has the opportunity to control the entry into the City a second liquor permit; that the number of liquor permits available within the City of Dublin are somewhat limited at this point in time. Mr. Amorose moved to amend the Ordinance as follows: Section 3. "This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the peace, health, safety, morals and welfare of the citizens of Dublin, Ohio; and for the reason that revenues provided to the City from the territory sought to be annexed will be used to provide essential municipal services, including police protection services and fire/emergency medical dispatching services to the citizens of the City of Dublin and to those in the territory sought to be annexed, then this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption." Ms. Maurer seconded the motion to amend. It was noted under the deed restrictions for the party house and park that the client would buy the liquor and provide it to the caterer; that there would be no sales to the public. Mr. Eberhart noted again that the deed restrictions mentioned previously would not apply, and noted that the residents of the mobile home park across the road, may of those residents being retired and senior citizens, are concerned about their health, safety and welfare. It was noted that deed restrictions are enforceable by adjoining property owners, but that it could cost these persons $10,000 to $12,000 to bring the applicant to court in order to enforce those deed restrictions. Mr. Campbell said that he felt that Council needs to concentrate on what makes passage of the ordinance an emergency measure to the City. Mr. Smith said that he felt that the amendment to the Ordinance sub- stantiated the emergency nature. Mr. Eberhart also noted that in recent months there have been advertise- ments in publications as well as flyers with information which indicates a complete violation of the deed restrictions; that there has been a very high degree of misrepresentation, not only with respect to the clubhouse and picnic grounds but also with respect to the indoor golf facility which now has a liquor permit. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 Page Four Mayor Rozanski noted that Mr. Sutphen was now present. Vote on the amendment: Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Ordinance No. 94-90 - Ordinance Authorizing Establishment of Law Enforce- ment Trust Fund. Third Reading. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Ordinance No. 95-90 - Ordinance Authorizing Establishment of the Mandatory Drug Find Fund. Third Reading. Vote - Mr. CAmpbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Ordinance No. 96-90 - Ordinance Authorizing Establishment of Enforcement and Education Fund. Third Reading. Vote - Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Resolution No. 48-90 - Resolution Adopting City of Dublin Council's 1990 and 1991 Goals. Second Reading. There will be a third reading of the Resolution at the Council meeting on November 5, 1990. Ordinance No. 99-90 - Ordinance Accepting Lowest/Best Bid for Frantz Road Street Trees. (E) First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the Ordinance. Ms. Paula Yetzer said that what is proposed is to have 286 street trees planned on the east and west sides of Frantz Road; that these will be planted from S.R. 161 south to Tuttle Road; that two species of trees were chosen (Green Ash and a Thornless Hawthorn; that they would be placed approximately 50 feet apart (the Green Ash); that the Hawthorns would be placed approximately 25 to 30 feet apart; that they would be planted in the right-of-way. Mr. Amorose said that every property owner along the road should be contacted before the trees are planted, making sure that the planting is in keeping with what they have already done. Mr. Amorose moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Ordinance No. 100-90 - Ordinance Amending Chapter 181 (Income Tax) of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin. (E). First Reading. Mr. Strip introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Steve Hoffman reported that the changes requested would serve to clarify the ordinance, following conversations with tax practitioners and tax payers. It was noted that the Finance Committee had approved the recommended Chang s. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM N0. 10148 Hel October 15, 1990 19 Page Five Mr. Hoffman said that he had requested that the ordinance be passed as an emergency in order to inform the tax payers and tax practitioners of the changes well in advance of the filing season, and he also said that the forms are at the printers waiting to be printed. Mr. Sutphen moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Strip said that he did not feel comfortable with passing the Ordinance as an emergency; that the City should perhaps give the tax payers and tax practitioners a chance to react to the changes, and also to be informed of the proposed changes. Mr. Hoffman said that the information would be printed in the tax commissioners' newsletter, said newsletter having a mailing list of almost 1,000 practitioners. He noted that the next mailing would be toward the end of December or the first of January. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the next regularly scheduled meeting of Council on November 5, 1990. Ordinance No. 101-90 - Ordinance Amending Section 1184 of the Dublin Codified Ordinances - Special Permits. First Reading. Mrs. King introduced the Ordinance. At the request of Ms. Clarke, a Public Hearing will be held at the Council meeting on November 5, 1990. Ordinance No. 102-90 - Ordinance Amending Section 1305.02 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin, Ohio -One, Two and Three-Family Dwelling Code, and Declaring an Emergency. (E). First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Peter Lenz addressed the changes in Section 3. The CABO Code addresses safety issues in bathtubs and showers; however, it does not clearly define the issue of glass in a bath area. The purpose of the modification is to prevent injury for a person who would be in a tub who might slip and be within the reach of the glass that could be in the tub space, that being the purpose of the amendment. Mr. Lenz noted that the code states "glazing in shower and bathtub door enclosures includes all glazing within a vertical distance of 6 feet, measured from the bottom of the tub, and a horizontal distance of 3 feet. Mr. Lenz also said that if windows have been placed in the area that they must be made of some kind of safety glazing; plastic, tempered glass or safety glass. Mr. Strip noted that he thought that a clause had been omitted in the last sentence of Section 12. It was suggested by Mr. Smith that the Ordinance be held over for a second reading and that the changes should be reviewed and compared with the current code. Mr. Lenz noted that with regard to Section 7. that the CABO Code requires one handrail and also requires a guardrail on the open side of the stair. He said that the difficulty with this section, as currently written, is that the only way a single family home could be built with a handrail and guardrail combination would be a guardrail at 36" and a handrail between 30" and 34" which would mean that there would be a double rail system on a house, something that most houses do not have. This is a clarification in an attempt to bring the CABO Code into line with the commercial code of OBBC and also with standards that have been adopted by Montgomery and Hamilton counties. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting. Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 Page Six There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the next regularly scheduled meeting of Council on November 5, 1990. Resolution No. 50-90 - Resolution of Necessity-Muirfield Drive Extension. (E). First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Resolution. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer (out of room); Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on Resolution - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Resolution No. 51-90 - Resolution to Endorse Bond Issue for the Community Recreation Center. First Reading. Mrs. King introduced the Resolution. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and pass as an emergency. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote on motion - Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Vote on Resolution - Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Other Request for Approval of Preliminary Plat for Blazer Parkway Ms. Clarke commented: the City of Dublin is the applicant; this request for approval is for the 750 feet of Blazer Parkway between Rings Road and the Tuttle Crossing development; this is the section for which the City of Dublin is responsible; the City is ready to go ahead with the project; this is to be built as a boulevard which will taper into the three lane section opposite the entrance to Ashland. Mr. Smith reported that although the City is in a dispute with the property owners, the Rameys, regarding the appropriation take, the Rameys have abandoned the property and have moved out. Mr. Willis reported that the pre-construction meeting is scheduled for next week and the contractor. should be starting soon thereafter. He also said that the number of construction days on the project is 75 calendar days, but that construction will probably be delayed by the wintertime weather, and said that he would anticipate the completion of the actual roadway to allow for driving on it would be some time in the early summer of 1991. Mrs. King moved to ap rove the Preliminary Plat for the Paul Blazer Parkway extension. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Comments from Staff Mr. Hansley 1. With regard to the sewage pump station, even with the heavy rains in the past couple of weeks, the City did not exceed 6 million gallons per day. The telemetry equipment is installed and should be "ready to go" in a week or so. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 Page Seven 2. The annexation approved earlier tonight will be effective at midnight on this date. Because of the emergency passage of the Ordinance some of the City services will not be able to be provided immediately to the newly annexed area. 3. Mentioned the copy of a request for proposal from Cellular One distributed to Council members last week. Chief Ferrell 1. With regard to the proposed Justice Center, the architect firm intends to take it to the Planning and Zoning Commission the first meeting in November, and the project is proceeding very well. Ms. Kurtz 1. The proposal from Cellular One will be distributed to members of Council as soon as it is available (probably some time next week). Chief Bostic 1. Expressed his appreciation regarding the attendance at the Open House for the new fire station last week. Council Roundtable Discussion Ms. Maurer 1. Referred to one of the proposals distributed to Council regarding a cable television consultant. Said she felt that Council's goal regarding a cable consultant was for that person(s) to educate Council in order to prepare for negotiation after the first year. Noted that the proposed contract seems to lead immediately into negotiations. Mr. Hansley said that he expected a needs survey to happen from December 1990 to December 1991, using a consultant to help to develop and administer a survey and then to review the existing franchise based on that survey. Ms. Maurer said that she felt that Council had talked about having a presentation to Council of all the things that cable television can do and what the options could be for the City in preparation for negotiations. Then, gathering information via a hot line, Letting citizens know that the City wants to know their assessment of the service, what the problems are, etc. It was noted that Paxton Cable Television, Inc. will be in the City of Dublin, the company at present serving areas in Washington and Jerome townships. Discussion followed regarding the possible ramifications of the fact that there will be two cable companies serving the citizens of Dublin, the possibility of re-negotiating franchises, boundaries which are set up by Federal regulations, etc., and Ms. Maurer stated again that she felt that members of Council needed additional information and education on the whole issue. 2. Suggested that perhaps a small refrigerator could be placed in the Council office. Mr. Amorose 1. Noted that when construction of the new parking area at the Len Immke dealership had been completed that the area has never been graded or seeded. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BL4NK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 jJ Page Eight Ms. Kurtz said that the unsightliness of the area would be brought to the attention of Mr. Germain, recalling that there was a proposal last year, as part of the Germain Lincoln-Mercury dealership to build a Suzuki dealership that was approved by the Planning Commission but that even though they put in the parking lot they are not ready to build the dealership at the present time. 2. Has been brought to his attention that there has been a house under construction for more than two years on Macduff Way; that there was an occupancy permit granted; that there was no driveway installed; that it has never been graded off. Mr. Lenz said that a building permit is good for one year and that he would check into the situation. Mr. Amorose also wondered why the occupancy permit was granted when the driveway was not even installed. Mr. Sutphen 1. Said the City of Harrisonburg will be sending information to him which he will pass on to members of Council with information about a cable franchise recently negotiated by that City. 2. Regarding the painting of the street lights on Muirfield Drive, Mr. Hansley said that he did not know whether Mr. Johnson had had a chance to contact the electric company or not. Mr. Hansley said that the pump station site at the corner of Brand Road and Dublin Road will be painted, per Mr. Johnson, as soon as possible. 3. Noted that here it is the middle of October and the street improve- ments have not been completed, noting that Brand Road is not done, the striping is not done on Post Road, etc. Suggested in subsequent years reviewing the City streets on or about April 15th (Income Tax deadlin) so that bids could be let out in the middle of May, giving the City plenty of time to complete the street improvements before bad weather. Mr. Willis said that he expects the paving to be completed by the middle of the week and the striping to be done by the end of the week. He noted that the contractor is also working on the shoulder area on Post Road, but that he had gotten held up on that project because of the heavy rains last week. Mrs. King 1. Was contacted by a woman who lives on JanMar Court who had indicated that she and her neighbors will be calling Council members with regard to the status of land acquisition to implement the plan for the new bridge and connecting roads. Mr. Foegler is preparing a report and will give it to members of Council in the near future regarding the above topic. Mrs. King requested that a copy of that report be sent to the residents of JenMar Court as well. 2. Suggested that persons calling the municipal building for information regarding recycling be referred to the Waste Not line which is a service being provided by the Franklin County Regional Solid Waste Management Authority; that number being 898-2480. 3. Will be moving into temporary housing quarters beginning November 1st. 4. The Lowell Trace bike path has been finished; they have seeded and carefully sodded the land in front of Wexford Woods but it seems they have not anticipated connecting a bike path up to Lowell Trace. Ms. Clarke said staff would go out a check it this week. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 19 Page Nine Mr. Campbell 1. Wondered if there was any provision in the City's trash pickup contract for someone who is either handicapped, severely disabled or elderly to get assistance in getting their trash out to the curb so that the truck can pick it up. Mr. Harding said that he would ehck on it. 2. Noted that if persons are interested in serving on the Child Care Advisory Task Force that they contact the Parks and Recreation Department. 3. Referred to the results of the community/recreation center survey and noted that of the 40 questions on the survey, 13 related to the community center and 27 addressed other issues. Also noted that there were a couple of political questions included as well, and wondered why that had been done. Mr. Lorz said that they typically put in a poll a question or two that are in everybody else's polls in order to validate and be able to find out if your sample varies very much. Said that he would have liked (Mr. Campbell) to have seen questions about what people thought should be in the community center - whether people thought that the City should spend the money on a center or not; that if the pool were made available for teams, etc. would that change a vote, e.g. Suggested that in the future the City try to do the survey in another way, more directly asking citizens what the City wants to know from the survey results and not have so much "gingerbread". 4. Regarding decisions concerning the southwest area commitments. Noted that the residents of the area were in attendance at the last Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting to have their input on an informal item that was on the agenda, said case coming up about 11:00 or 11:30 P.M. and the residents were upset for two reasons: one, they sat at the meeting for three and one half hours before they got their chance to talk about the item; and second, there was some limitations that were placed on their opportunity to discuss it. Said he had received some letters from people that felt that they had been treated unfairly at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting because they did not have an opportunity to have a long discussion about the lack of the commitments being determined and honored. Noted also that there is at least one landowner in the area who is not necessarily in favor of the plan that the residents want, and that it appears that the City is in the position of trying to walk a narrow line between the statement of intention that the City made versus those desires of at least one of the principal landowners. He said that there was the issue of the roadway plan as well as the park area. Recalled that Council had discussed the possibility of taking the money set aside for the park in the area and using said monies to purchase more land further out. The residents want the park to stay in their area. Asked members of Council to read the copies of the letters he had distributed to them, copies of letters to residents, to staff, to the Chairman of the Planning Commission, etc. The City needs to determine once and for all what commitments exist, those that the City can and cannot honor and address those issues candidly to the people that live there because they need an answer. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held October 15, 1990 _ 19 Page Ten Ms. Maurer said she would withdraw her suggestion to accept the money for the park land, and the further suggestion that the City use that money to buy additional land further out in the township for a park. Mayor Rozanski 1. Referred to a letter received from a resident in the Deer Run Stream area who complained about the concrete debris on his project; said debris being left there following recent construction in the area, said debris blocking the stream and causing erosion. Staff will look into the matter. 2. Announced a Ground Breaking for Tuesday, October 16, 1990 at the new Hidaka plant in the Wilcox Road and Shier-Rings Road area. 3. Wondered about the leaf pickup schedule. It was reported that the leaf pickup has begun; that it will be reported in the papers; that the schedule will be followed through Thanksgiving. 4. Thanked Mrs. Caplinger for filling in for Mrs. Urban. Mayor Rozanski adjourned the meeting at 9:55 P.M. Mayor - Presiding 0 cer lerk of Co nci