Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/06/1990 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Hel Au ust 6 1990 19 Mayor Jan Rozanski called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council to order at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, August 6, 1990. Mr. Sutphen led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Campbell, Ms. Maurer, Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Strip and r1r. Sutphen. Mrs. King was absent .,with an excused absence. Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also present as were the following City Staff: Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Chief Ferrell, Mr. Foegler, Mr. Harding, Mr. Jones, Ms. Jordan, Ms. Kurtz, Mr. Mack, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. McNemar, Mrs. Metz, Ms. Newcomb, Ms. Puscarcik and Mr. Willis. Mr. Amorose moved to approve the minutes of the July 16, 1990 Council meeting. Mr. Campbell seconded the motion with a correction to page 14, fourth paragraph, last line - the word "sly" being corrected to "fly". Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, abstain; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Mayor Rozanski congratulated Chief Ferrell on his recent election as president of the Ohio Association of Police Chiefs, whose headquarters is now on Riverside Drive. Sewer Update - Mr. Terry Foegler, Director of Development Mr. Foegler, Development Director, had the following comments: 1. Referred to the brief written report provided to Council members. 2. The actual detailed monthly report that is submitted to the Ohio EPA will be distributed to Council members prior to the second meeting of the month. 3. The Ohio EPA will need to come up with a determination as to the storm event that will meet the design criteria for Dublin's sewage system. 4. Data subsequent to August 1 that was submitted to the Ohio EPA in mid-July was prior to the recent 16 plus million gallon storm event. 5. The determination by the Ohio EPA should be submitted to Dublin by the end of the week, and that information, once obtained, will be given to Council. 6. Crews in the field are continuing to find I/I. 7. When the status report is submitted to the Ohio EPA in mid-August, Dublin will have removed in excess of 3 million gallons a day from the system for a peak storm event.. 8. The crews, under Danny Johnson, have removed I/I from the system at a much higher rate then was projected by any of the engineering firms. 9. With regard to the telemetry system, authorization has been given to go ahead and proceed. 10. Construction of the new lift station is on schedule, with an August 24, 1990 completion date. 11. The line on the east branch is in place and coming along well. 12. Have been working with representatives from Planned Communities to get an interim system approved for Perimeter Mall, and that request has been approved by the Ohio SPA. The system allows discharge into the sewer during normal flows, and when the pump station reaches approximately 75% capacity, sewage will be held on site. Correspondence There was no objection to a request, through the Ohio Department of Liquor Control, for a C1 liquor permit from Giovanni and Michael Ciotola, dba La Cucina at 6451 Sawmill Road. Comments from Citizens (Items not on the agenda) None. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Hel Au ust 6 1990 19 Page Two Mayor Rozanski announced that Council would deviate slightly from the printe agenda, having a presentation regarding the City's purchase of a computer. Ordinance No. 58-90 - Ordinance Authorizing the Purchase of a Computer. Third Reading. Mrs. Metz introduced Mr. Murry Mercier of Ernst and Young, consultants, and Mr. Bill Eckels of IBM. She noted that the City has been dealing with USTI, United Systems Technolo from Texas. Mr. Mercier had the following comments: 1. Is with Ernst and Young in the Information Systems Consulting Depart- ment. 2. Company was engaged to assist the City with the development of an information systems strategy and to help the City identify, select and negotiate the purchase of a base information system. 3. Started with 29 system vendors. 4. Received and reviewed 12 proposals. 5. With staff, attended demonstrations presented by four of the finalist vendors, and also conducted client reference calls for the same vendors. 6. City Staff and Ernst and Young selected USTI for further investigation and visited the site of an installation. 7. Tried to identify where the City would want to be in five years with an information system, understanding the position of the finance system in the context of the total City needs. 8. USTI provides an integrated single vendor solution for finance, tax, police and fire dispatching, law enforcement, purchasing and court applications. 9. Provides the basis for adding office automation, utility management as well as engineering applications. 10. This will be a single networking solution, providing for growth in hardware. 11. The system would be an IBM AS/400 mini-computer line. 12. With regard to cost, the hardware cost would be approximately $250,000 - the software applications approximately $101,000 with additional fee for setup in-house, etc. for an initial total investment of approxi- mately $356,200.00. 13. Other one-time cost estimates for cabling, training, implementation support, etc. should be approximately $58,000.00. 14. With regard to maintenance cost, a recurring cost, hardware and soft- ware maintenance, IBM has bid $8,468. 15. The difference between integrated and interfaced. For example, an address file. If integrated, several different departments could access the same file, while interfaced would mean that there would be two or three different address files with programs in place to keep them "in sync", the same piece of information ending up multiple times on the disc. 16. The preference would be to have an integrated system. 17. The AS/400 and disc base would probably last two to three years before requiring additional disc space; the mini-computer could perhaps last five years. 18. Mrs. Metz and Chief Ferrell visited a city with a system similar in size and complexity. 19. Have chosen to go with a personal computer approach versus the mainline terminal, noting that the office automation software is better on the personal computer. Chief Ferrell said that this was probably the best software package that they had looked at as far as police-type functions. Mr. Strip asked about timing as far as installation and the proposed move of the Police Department. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Hel Au ust 6 1990 19 Page Three Chief Ferrell said that it should present no problem; the equipment in the Police Department being able to be transferred, regardless of the site. Mr. Mercier said that there would be a possibility of a $4,000 disposable cost in cabling related to the police station and, in fact, the performance of the system could be improved should the station be moved closer to the Municipal Building; perhaps being possible to use fiberoptics for a direct line rather than having to go over the telephone line. Responding to a question from Mr. Strip regarding budget, Mrs. Metz said th the budget would probably have to be amended - the line item projected for the computer itself for this year was $200,000; noted that there are some savings from a prior computer contract of about $60,000 and also noted that in addition $50,000 had been allocated for a records management system which will probably not be implemented during this budget year. Mrs. Metz said that the additional dollar appropriation would be about $40,000. Ms. Maurer moved to add to the Ordinance the amount of $356,200.00 with the lowest/best bidder being USTI/IBM. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Ordinance No. 34-90 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on a 34.818 Acre Tract at the Southwest Corner of Rings Road and I-270. Public Hearing. Mr. Christopher Cline and Mr. Charles Driscoll registered as proponents. There were no registered opponents. Mr. Bowman's comments were as follows: 1. The subject site contains 34.8 acres. 2. It is located on the southwest corner of I-270 and Rings Road, and currently holds the R-1A zoning classification in the township. 3. It is now a part of Dublin. 4. The applicant is proposing to rezone from R-lA to S0, Suburban Office and Institutional District. 5. Showed aerial and ground slides of the site. 6. With the extension of Coffman Road this is a very visible piece along I-270 which the applicant and staff envision doing well as a corporate office or large office building-type site. 7. Noted that the zoning of this property really does not affect the relocation of Wilcox Road. 8. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval with the following conditions: A. That the applicant agree to plat and dedicate the right-of-way for Coffman Road as shown in Dublin's Thoroughfare Plan. The amount and location of the right-of-way will be determined by the City. Will make that determination based upon preliminary engineering studies; how the City would best tie Dublin's planned boulevard section to the Columbus three to five lane section of Britton Parkway. Dublin would supply the typical section in that case. B. That the applicant agree to construct the extension of Coffman Road (three lanes) as proposed in the Dublin Thoroughfare Plan. The issuance of a building permit for any one development or successive developments totaling 250,000 square feet or greater, would necessitate the construction of that road to be the trigger for the developer's building. In the event that the building construction did not trigger the roadway, the property owner would still be obligated to construct the road when the road is constructed north of Rings Road and completes the Coffman Road extension. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Hel Au ust 6 1990 19 Page Four C. That the applicant dedicate right-of-way equal to 40 feet from ceterline along the south side of Rings Road, also in compliance with Dublin's Thoroufare Plan. Mr. Cline said that the applicant agrees to the conditions as reported in the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Mr. Amorose asked where the name change from Coffman Road to Britton Parkwa would take place, and it was noted that that had not been decided, but that perhaps it would change at Rings Road. There will be a third reading of the Ordinance at the Council Meeting on August 20, 1990. Ordinance No. 33-90 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on a 38.36 Acre Tract Located on the East Side of Wilcox Road, North of Tuttle Road. Third Reading. Mr. Bowman mentioned the memorandum prepared by staff, as requested by Council, outlining an understanding of commitments as related to this rezoning. He also noted that staff feels comfortable with the land uses that have been presented, and recommended that Council proceed with the rezoning and take up those issues that remain as separate items and encourage public input on same. Mr. Campbell expressed appreciation at the attempt for understanding of the terms and commitments. He also noted that Mr. Cline was kind enough to write up his understanding and that staff and the applicant's understanding of the terms and commitments were fairly similar. He did note that the roadway issue still needed to be resolved, but that it seemed that staff and the developer had an understanding, and that the rezoning request should, therefore, go forward. Ms. Maurer wondered about the status of the park land dedication or fee in lieu thereof. She said that she felt that the City should accept the fee and then purchase park land further out in the township at a less expensive price per acre. With this rezoning, Mr. Bowman said that the staff understanding was that the developer would donate $100,000, saying also that there would be a companion zoning (Windmiller tract) to follow which has 8 acres that could be dedicated for park land, and that the intention of the developer is to either call it park or zone it into R-3, a single family zoning category. The agreement on the Windmiller rezoning was either the eight acres or $150,000. Mr. Cline said that there were two commitments - $100,000 fee on this rezoning and $150,000 with regard to the rezoning on the west side of Wilcox Road. He also noted that the engineers have not yet determined on the Porter tract how much of the multi-family will be lost be dedicating the piece of Suburban Office which the Wilcox Road residents had asked the applicant ,w, to do. Mr. Cline also said that the multi-family on the Porter tract will have its own recreational facilities and that it is now developing with condominiums, about eight units per acre. Mr. Cline also said that the developer would commit either the $250,000 in lieu of park land dedication or dedicate the eight acres for park to the City; that the choice is Dublins. Ms. Clarke, responding to an issue raised by the residents, requested that Council, if they agree to the rezoning, attach a condition that the applicant's submitted text be part and parcel of the rezoning. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting Dublin City Council Meeting. DA1T N LEGAL BLANK GO. FORM NO. 10148 Hel Au ust 6 1990 19 Page Five Mr. Hansley suggested that the park land dedication or fee be made a part of the motion as well. Mrs. Judy Yoder, resident, on behalf of contiguous property owners, requeste that the road system as represented on the Dublin Area Plan be developed concurrently with the rezoning, and also requested that if the roadway system is not acted on at this meeting that Council pass a resolution that the road system be in place before further development is considered north of this property. Mr. Campbell said that he wanted to clear up an erroneous perception, saying that the City cannot afford to build every road on the day the frist zoning takes place. Ms. Maurer commented that the building of roads and other capital improve- ments is something that Council has to prioritize, along with other future, long range plans. Regarding whether or not there was a roadway plan that Council could commit to, Mr. Cline said that with regard to this particular parcel that the developer's commitment was to provide "this right-of-way around to here" and then 30' or half of the right-of-way through the balance of the northern par of the property; said commitment being in the zoning text. He further said that the applicant will do everything in the land that he controls, but that obviously he cannot make any commitments on land out of his control. Mr. Bowman said that there are three property owners who have not "read into" the plan; that the roadway would go through a house, take 30' and would require that the City build the road; that the property owners do not necessarily believe it to be in their best interest and that that is where negotiations stand at the moment. Mr. Cline said that Mr. Don Kenney will be presenting a plan before the Planning and Zoning Commission on Thursday night for single story condominiu , eight units to an acre, with recreation areas, said plan providing for about 75% of the roadway alignment on that parcel. Mr. Cline also noted that the City will have to make some decisions as to wh they want to see happen regarding the roadway. Mr. Bowman requested that the development text and landscape buffer plan be made a part of the rezoning. Mr. Campbell had a question regarding the development text where the developer has voluntarily agreed to "prior to development applicant shall prepare and forward to the Dublin Planning Department for review a site plan for any portion of site to be developed, and following consultations the site plan will be scheduled for review in accordance with these standards at a public hearing." He asked what the developer thought that "review" means in that context. Ms. Clarke said that she thought that Mr. Campbell's question was that is it review or is it review and approval. She said that her anticipation is that it would be review and approval. Mr. Cline said that there was no question about that with a vote by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Ms. Maurer moved to pass the Ordinance with the development text and the landscape buffer plan be made a part of the rezoning, and that the applicant shall pay the City of Dublin $100,000 in lieu of park land dedication. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, abstain; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Six Mayor Rozanski told Mrs. Yoder and the other residents that he believed that Council is committed to trying to get the road systems built as quickly as possible and in close proximity to what is shown on the plan, but that the public sector does work a little more slowly than the private sector. Ordinance No. 56-90 - Ordinance Authorizing City of Dublin to Enter Into Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Program. Third Reading. Vote - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Ordinance No. 59-90 - Ordinance Accepting the Lowest Best Bid for Tuller Road Improvements. Third Reading. Mayor Rozanski suggested voting down the Ordinance; that the project would be re-bid in the winter, after the first of the year, and that it be bid as a concrete road with an asphalt overlay. He also said that it was his understanding that it will take 60 days or longer for the utility companies to move the telephone lines before construction can begin on the road itself. Mr. Foegler said that since the right-of-way necessary for the project cannot be obtained through negotiations that staff would recommend that the City initiate a take of the property and would also recommend that the project be done on an assessment basis. Mr. Hansley said that he did not think it fair to expect the City to pay for both land acquisition and construction of the project. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Campbell, no; Mr. Strip, no; Mayor Rozanski, no; Mr. Amorose, no; Ms. Maurer, no; Mr. Sutphen, no. Ordinance No. 63-90 - Ordinance Amending Chapter 921 of the Dublin Codified Ordinances Entitled "Sewer Regulations" to Comply with Federal and State EPA Requirements. Second Reading. There will be a third and final reading of the Ordinance at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. Ordinance No. 64-90 - Ordinance Amending Section 1313.04(b) of the Dublin Codified Ordinances to Regulate Areas of Special Flood Hazard. Second Reading. Ms. Clarke reported that FEMA wanted a copy of the passed Ordinance at their office in Chicago by August 15, 1990. Mr. Amorose moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Ordinance No. 65-90 - Ordinance Dealing with Conversion of Private Streets to Public Streets. Second Reading. Mr. Sutphen said that he believes that in order for a private street to become a public street in the City of Dublin that it should be brought up to the standards of a public street with curb and gutter. He noted that the developers of Asherton were required to put in curb and gutter and that the road was required to be built to the standards of the City of Dublin highway specifications. Mr. Strip said that in a situation such as the Mews, a private street that was built before the standards were passed that as a matter of economics that perhaps this street could be grandfathered in. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Seven Mr. Amorose said that the recommendation from engineering is to remove the curbs, relocate the fire hydrant and add an inch of overlay to the street. He also recalled that with regard to the first stage of Muirfield, on that zoning, that the City did not require the curb and gutter because of the lot sizes and all of the open space area, but that in The Mews Subdivision, it is quite dense. Mr. Sutphen wondered where the grandfathering would stop, but did say that he would be willing to grandfather this one in. Ms. Maurer noted that the City would be demanding that this subdivision meet higher standards than the standards required in the areas surrounding The Mews Subdivision. Mr. Thomas Lanane, President of The Mews Association, said that since their subdivision was built out that they would fall under category C. of the Ordinance. Mr. Lanane had the following comments: 1. He first met with the City Engineer about eight months ago in an attempt to follow City procedure, but found that there was no procedure or guidelines, and as a result, the residents have "held off" and delayed the scheduled improvements. 2. Are asking for exclusion of the gutters, which are extremely expensive to put in. 3. The street will be repaved to meet City standards. 4. The street is a long term liability for private owners. 5. The Mews is about a 13 year old development. 6. A number of people of retirement age live there. 7. New roofs need to be installed. 8. The cost of putting in gutters literally doubles the cost of the paving project. 9. Residents are hoping to get the gutters excluded and proceed with getting the street paved before cold weather. 10. The street is not in very good condition. 11. Two condominiums were sold in the past month at about 20% below market value. 12. Have a slight downspout problem and will hire a contractor to help to get that problem handled. With regard to the width of the street and allowing parking on both sides of the street, Mr. Strip wondered if there were any problems regarding acces for emergency vehicles. Mr. Lanane said that they had an emergency run recently and that there did not appear to be a problems. Mayor Rozanski expressed a concern, wondering if the City's large snow plows would damage the curbs, catching the top of the vertical step, and as a result tearing it off. Mr. Lanane said that they do not have any hard right 90 degree angles in the development in terms of the street, but that if the plow were to damage the sidewalks that it was his understanding that it would be the resident's responsibility to repair the damage. Mr. Lanane also said that they also have a plan to take care of all the concrete pads and driveways. With regard to the costs involved, Mr. Lanane said that they had gotten cost estimates between $18,000 and $22,000 for the paving, and that they estimate that it will cost almost that same amount to put in the gutters because of the reconstruction of the curbs which would be required. Mr. Willis said that his logic for suggesting that the curb and gutter be installed deals with the drainage; that sometimes there is an open joint between the concrete and the asphalt, and that with that kind of curb that The Mews has that at times the open joint lies right where the water runs. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 i Page Eight Mr. Willis noted that with the curb and gutter that there is about 18" which slopes down; the water runs into the pan of the gutter and the open joint is removed so that there is less water on the pavement and he noted that water on the paving causes the pavement to fail. Mr. Sutphen siad that he would not be present at the next Council meeting on August 20th, but said that he would be agreeable to grandfathering this particular street, but also that he wanted it to be understood that anything in the future would comply with the Ordinance. It was noted that additional information was being requested regarding the number and location of private streets still in Dublin. With regard to the fire hydrant, Mr. Lanane said that the residents would absorb whatever expense is required to construct whatever offset is required on the fire hydrant. There will be a third reading of the Ordinance at the regularly scheduled Council meeting on August 20, 1990. Ordinance No. 66-90 - Ordinance Amending Annual Appropriations Ordinance - Dublin Village Center Lighting. Second Reading. Mr. Bowman said that staff was requesting emergency passage so that the additional $150,000 can be added to the City's $150,000 budgeted for the project and so that staff, as well, can negotiate with the property owners a voluntary assessment project, being able to proceed with negotiations with the developer, establishing timelines as well as the process necessary to proceed with the project. Mr. Bowman also pointed out that appropriating the money at this point does not obligate any entity, but would simply speed up the process and allow staff to negotiate an assessment. Mr. Bowman also said that the City has budgeted $150,000 for the project, and that the City would be requesting an additional $150,000 which would be paid back to the City by the developer. Mr. Amorose asked if the City would be assessing the area that has been sold by State Savings as well. Mr. Bowman said that staff is trying to negotiate with other large developers, and said that if Drexel Development agrees to pay half, and the City pays half, that that would essentially be the deal for any other property owner. With regard to the number and cost of the fixtures, Mr. Bowman said that the $300,000 would do all of Village Parkway, Dublin Village Center Drive, Banker Drive and the portion of Tuttle Road as it goes around Bob Evans, Hechinger's and the existing hotels. He noted that approximately two-thirds of the area would be the responsibili of Drexel Development, and that approximately one third would be on lands once owned by State Savings. Mr. Bowman said that approximately 70 fixtures would be involved at the approximate cost of $4200 per fixture, which would include purchasing and installation. Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Resolution No. 21-90 - Resolution Designating an Old Dublin Community Improv went Corporation. Second Reading. Mr. Smith requested that Council treat this as a second reading. There will be a third reading of the Resolution on August 20, 1990. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Nine Ordinance No. 69-90 - Ordinance to Accept Annexation of 7.129 Acres from Washington Township to the City of Dublin. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the Ordinance. Mayor Rozanski noted that the acreage is a narrow strip of land that runs from Shier-Rings Road to U.S. 33. The Ordinance will be read for a second time at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on August 20, 1990. Ordinance No. 70-90 - Ordinance Authorizing Certain Items of Compensation Relative to the Appointment of a New Building Inspection Administrator (Certified Building Official). First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Harding noted that the Ordinance dealt with two items of compensation - a temporary housing allowance not to exceed $500 per month until the successful candidate is able to relocate to the Central Ohio area with a maximum period of time being three calendar months; the second item being a moving allowance equal to one month's salary. Mr. Harding pointed out that this would be consistent with the City's past practice over the past two years when hiring persons for department and division head level, the most recent being the Chief of Police and Director of Development. Ms. Maurer moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; ~ Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Mr. Harding said that the City would be offering a salary in the range of $47,000 to $48,000 annually. Mr. Foegler said that the City would be saving money (the service being contracted out at the present time) and that BOCA had strongly recommended that such a position be filled. Mr. Foegler also noted that the candidate is an architect as well as a Class 1, 2, and 3 technician. Vote on the Ordinance - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Ordinance No. 71-90 - Ordinance to Accept Lowest/Best Bid for S.R. 161/U.S. 33 Landscape Improvements. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the Council meeting on August 20, 1990. Resolution No. 22-90 - Resolution of Necessity to Submit to Electors Bonds for Construction of Community Center. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Resolution. Ms. Maurer moved to fill in the dollar amount of $11,500,000.00. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Mayor Rozanski said that the purpose of the Resolution is to send the Resolution to the County Auditor's Office for purposes of determining millage. He also noted that through the work of the focus groups and their perception of the community center that the project came up with a proposed price tag: of $11,088,645.00; said price not including debt service or operating expenses. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Ten Ms. Jordan said that enabling legislation will be introduced at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. Mr. Strip acknowledged that he was strongly in favor of a community center but that he wondered whether the City was not moving too quickly on an 11 million dollar plus project, and that perhaps more homework should be done, especially as regards financing. Mr. Campbell said that he felt that Council owed it to those who were given the task to provide the information - Parks and Recreation Staff, community representatives and consultants - who through their many hours of hard work and time involvement came up with this proposed project to move ahead and at least send the information down to the county auditors to get the millage information. Mr. Strip, mentioning the yearly debt expense to the City of approximately $1,400,000, suggested perhaps phasing the project. Mayor Rozanski pointed out that the project can be stopped at any time. Mr. Amorose wanted a policy commitment as well as numbers - how many people will use the facility; what will be the fee structre, etc., noting that staff would need to make definite recommendations to Council as to suggested operating procedures, etc. Ms. Jordan said that that policy had been discussed at one of the meetings during the summer; what the fee structure would be; whether there would be membership fees, etc. Mr. Amorose noted that that information had not been shared with the rest of Council. Mrs. Margaret Vance requested clarification regarding millage. Mayor Rozanski said that this legislation, if passed, would go to the County Auditor's Office to determine the millage and that following that determination, Council would have to make a decision as to whether the proposed project would be placed on inside millage or outside millage. Mr. Campbell noted that with regard to inside millage, the authority to do the project without imposing any tax, would create a situation in which the City would reach the limits of spending covered by tax monies generated. He also noted that the project would probably have to be phased. Mayor Rozanski noted that the debt service alone would be over a million dollars annual and that the cost of running the facility, over and above revenues generated by programs and perhaps fees, would be another $300,000 per year, requiring that the City pay approximately 1.5 millino dollars annually, over and above paying the loan back. Mr. Campbell said that the project, in his opinion, if done at all, would be done with outside millage, the question being whether the City does it with "no new taxes" or whether there could be new taxes and let the citizens decide how badly they want a community/recreation center. It was noted that Council would have one meeting, on August 20th, to decide whether or not they wanted to do the project, since the legislation would need to be certified to the Board of Elections by August 23, 1990 in order to get on the November ballot. Mrs. Vance said that she was under the impression, from previous conversatio , that the issue would inside millage. Mr. Strip said that in his opinion the residents of the City do want a center, but that he felt that the question is, whether or not the City can afford such a project without adding taxes. Vote on Ms. Maurer's motion to add the amount of $11,500,000 to the Resolution: Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. STrip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAVT N LE AL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Eleven Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Campbell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Resolution No. 23-90 - Resolution of Intent - Appropriate Fee Simple Interes Temporary Construction Easements and Permanent Sewer Easements on 42.439 Acre Tract. Muirfield Drive Extension. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Resolution, moved to waive the three time reading rule and pass as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Resolution No. 24-90 - Resolution of Intent - Appropriate Fee Simple Interes , Temporary Construction Easements, Permanent Sewer Easements and Bikeways. First Reading. Mr. Strip introduced the Resolution, moved to waive the three time reading rule and pass as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, ye ; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Resolution No. 25-90 - Resolution of Intent - Appropriate Fee Simple Interes , Temporary Construction Easements, Permanent Sewer Easements and Bikeway Easements. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the Resolution, moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Resolution No. 26-90 - Resolution of Intent - Appropriate Fee Simple Interest and Temporary Construction Easements - 14.730 Acre Tract - Muirfield Drive Extension. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Resolution, moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Twelve Resolution No. 27-90 - Resolution of Intent - Appropriate Fee Simple Interes and Temporary Construction Easements on a 17.152 Acre Tract - Muirfield Driv Extension. First Reading. Mr. Campbell introduced the Resolution, moved to waive the three time readin rule and pass as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Amorose, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Other Discussion Regarding Proposed Legislation from Jeffrey Johnson - Prohibiting the Sale of Alcoholic Beverages at Gas Stations. Ms. Maurer moved to direct the Clerk of Council to write a letter saying that Council does not support the proposed legislation, that it does not or will not solve the drunk/driving problem, and that there may be a constitutional problem with it. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Discussion Regarding H.B. 865 - Sewer and Water Service. Ms. Maurer moved to send Representative William Schuck a letter requesting City representation on the Advisory Committee dealing with proposed legislation on H.B. 865. Mr. Campbell seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Discussion Regarding Northeast Quadrant Master Plan. Ms. Maurer referred to a memorandum regarding a Land Use Planning Committee Meeting, requesting guidance from Council to the Planning Department/ Development Department as to what direction they should go in terms of development a northeast quadrant master plan. The memorandum included the following: "The committee had a long discussion of the type of planning which should be done. We decided that Council should approve the process because of some difference of philosophy among staff and committee members. Two of us leaned toward a negotiated plan, relying on the developer's attorney for early, major input. Two of us leaned toward establishing a plan consisting of guidelines regarding land uses and location of infrastructure, asking for some input from developers on their intentions regarding timing, leaving final negotiations for later. Following are three possible planning scenarios: 1. Development Department, Planning Division through amendments to Community Plan within four months: A. Establishes location of major infrastructure: roads, sewer/water lines, drainage, parks (location of donated, purchased land), etc. B. Provide detailed guide to land use expectations for area. C. After Council adoption of A & B, work with developers on rezoning - concept plan. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL. BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 I Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Thirteen II. Development Department, Planning Division, work with Harrison Smith (represents most owners of developable land) and Civic Association to bring concept plan for rezoning to P&Z by end of moratorium period (4-6 months). (This may take longer than moratorium period.) III. Development Department/Planning Division, wors with developers, residen to create amendments to Community Plan, including everying in I. A and above, providing basic guidelines and policies for further development of this area. An example of what you might have from that process is: No more commercial in Northeast Quadrant. Location of single family, professional offices, multi-family, etc. Location of major public improvements (roads, etc.) Public funds needed to make plan happen (alternatives: private, public partnerships). Ms. Maurer said that Mr. Foegler promoted the first alternative which says that the Planning Department establish the major planned use and then negotiate later with the developers, having established some standards to use as a criterion in negotiations. Mr. Foegler said that staff would like feedback from Council as to what kind of product they would like to see. Mayor Rozanski commented that he did not think that the City would again get as large a group of landowners and developers together such as took place in the recent rezoning, approximately 400 acres with three land- owners and one person negotiating, that person being Mr. Harrison Smith. He noted that in the area north of SummitView as well as the area south of Bright Road that there will be a greater number of landowners involved. Mr. Amorose said that he thought that Mr. Foegler's suggestion would probably be the quickest in that the Planning Department could simply say no additional commercial development north of SummitView, no additional retail on Sawmill, etc. He said, however, that he felt that the developer should be brought into the discussions. Mr. Foegler said that he did not think that the intent was to bypass the residents, developers or landowners, but that the plan would be to work with developers towards a formal rezoning application or to work with developers for conceptual land use and policy decisions, supplying the framework for future rezonings, tying down basic land use decisions, basic infrastructure decisions, etc. Ms. Maurer, Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Sutphen and Mr. Campbell indicated that they felt that staff be given direction to follow through with I. Staff Report Regarding Proposed Police Facility Location. Mr. Foegler recalled that at the Council Goal Setting Meeting that staff had made Council aware that the City is probably a year away on the design contract for the Coffman Park Plan. He also noted that a more detailed site plan of the Coffman Park Project has indicated that there is quite a bit of flood plain on the site. Mr. Foegler also mentioned that the Police Department has also been ° concerned with access on the Coffman Park location and that since the lease for the present facility is up in 1992 that they would like to move more quickly on their facility and thus did look for an alternate location. That alternate location being suggested is a portion of the Jentgen-Klein tract off of Post Road which the City currently owns, noting that the tract is quite close to Coffman Park, noting that the alternate site would be better in terms of traffic flow. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL eLA NK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6 , 1990 19 ~ Page Fourteen Mr. Sutphen moved that Council adopt the alternate site for the Police Station Facility - the Jentgen-Klein tract which the City owns. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote - Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Discussion Regarding Proposed City of Dublin Goal from Board of Zoning Appeals. Mayor Rozanski referred to the memorandum from Mr. Bill Chambers, Chairperso of the Board of Zoning Appeals, noting that the Board of Zoning Appeals recently voted unanimously in favor of a proposed goal to plan and implement education and training opportunities for members of Dublin's Boards, Commissions and Committees. Mr. Hansley noted that money has been budgeted the last three years for this purpose but that staff has not done an adequate job of informing the members of the boards, commissions and committees about money available and/or meetings or seminars of interest. Mr. Campbell said that while serving on boards, commissions, etc. he did not know that there were funds available for this purpose. He also said that he felt that it was very important for members of the boards, commissions and committees to have some training, education and information prior to their terms, not simply "on-the-job-training". Mayor Rozanski moved to direct staff to come back to the next Council meeting with a plan for educating the members of the City's boards, commissions and committees. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Discussion Regarding Maintenance of Macbeth Drive. Mr. Hansley referred to a letter from a citizen who requested that the City maintain the ditch along Macbeth Drive, and also noted that the City does not have an easement to get down to it. Mr. Smith said that it is a much bigger issue then it appears to be on the surface - first of all, does the City have an obligation, and if so, what legal problems would arise if the City should choose to "get in that business". He also noted that there would be a problem in how the City would pay for that service. Mr. Hansley noted that the City presently maintains the ditches that are in the public right-of-way, but not those that are in the private domain. Mr. Mack pointed out that there are a number of restrictions as to what can and cannot be done, whether it is in the public domain or private domain, and also said that there are limits as to what kind of development can be done within a floodway, including maintenance of a ditch in that floodway. Mr. Smith said that he would research the issue, get additional information, and coordinate his findings with Mr. Mack and then report back to Council. Discussion Regarding Bright Road Area Waterline Improvements Mr. Foegler commented that staff, at the request of City Council, surveyed the residents of the Bright Road area concerning their desire for public water, existing water quality, and preferred method of assessment. He noted that those owners who own property in Part 1 were generally supportive of the project while those owners having property in Part 2 were not supportive. It was also noted that the majority of owners in Part 1 favored the "Front- Foot" method of assessment. Mr. Foegler also said, that since Part 2 of the project will not be built at this time, that a recalculation of the assessment to the owners in RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Fifteen Part 1 was done. Ms. Maurer asked if staff had a recommendation regarding the health and safety aspect of the issue. Mr. Foegler said that the report indicated that where there were severe problems, float problems, etc. as reported by the residents, that they were concentrated in the area where there was a desire for the improvement and that those citizens who did not want the improvement reported very few of those types of problems. Mr. Amorose pointed out that since the survey was done that the large rezoning in the quadrant has been done as well as the decision regarding placement of the bridge across the Scioto River and the extension of the new road which may cut Bright Road in half. He noted that the above recent decisions might affect the response of the residents as to whether or not they want to invest money in the proposed waterline. Mr. Amorose also said that he did not feel that there was equity in the front footage method of assessment. Council agreed with Mr. Foegler's recommendation that the issue be examined as part of the entire Northeast Quadrant planning as to need, location and timing of the overall project. Comments from Staff Mrs. Metz 1. Requested a Finance Committee meeting. Mr. Strip pointed out that there has been a change in the membership of that committee with the resignation of Mr. Campbell who was appointed as Council representative to the Planning and Zoning Commissi Mr. Sutphen moved to appoint Mr. Amorose as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Committee as well as be a member of the Finance Committee. He also moved to appoint Mr. Campbell to the Land Use Committee. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. 2. Asked that members of Council peruse the Financial Report for 1989 prepared by members of her staff, mentioning specifically the hard work expended by Marsha Grigsby, Assistant Finance Director. Chief Ferrell 1. Reported that a police cruiser was involved in an accident last Friday, resulting in severe damage to the cruiser, but involving only minor injuries to the police officer. Also reported that the other driver was cited. Mr. McDaniel 1. An information packet was assembled and sent out to the members of the Solid Waste Advisory Board who will be having their organizational meeting on Monday, August 13, 1990 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Jones 1. Announced that there will be a special meeting on August 16, 1990 at 6:30 P.M. at the Chamber of Commerce Building to discuss the proposed Community Improvement Corporation as well as proposed improvements to the historic district. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYT N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 1014H Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Sixteen Council Roundtable Discussion Mr. Campbell. 1. Wondered if there was a legal reason why there seemed to be an inordinate number of no left turn signs down along Frantz Road, the City polluting the roadway with the signs. Also commented regarding the sandwich board signs in various rights- of-way in the City, which he noted have to violate the City sign code. Mr. Smith concurred that those signs are blatantly illegal by the City's code. Mayor Rozanski asked about the status of the kiosks which were purchased to serve a purpose of providing a means of providing general information to the citizens, advertising meetings, athletic sign-ups and events, concerts, etc. He also commented that one problem with the signs is that many of them remain in place long after the scheduled event. Mr. Campbell suggested that Council needs to arrive at a policy decisio and then would need to announce that decision months in advance so that the various groups will be aware that the sandwick board signs will be eliminated and what alternatives are available for getting out the necessary information. Ms. Maurer noted that the newspapers will print information for free; that people need to get used to sending their notices to the newspapers. Mr. Jones said that two more kiosks will be delivered within a few days. He also noted that there are some slight overruns on cost as a result of some of the modifications made to the prototype. Mr. Jones said that staff has been stating as a matter of policy that the availability of the signs in the median may be short term; that groups need to start making arrangements for some other form of advertising. Mr. Jones said that staff has been proceeding slowly and cautiously making adjustments to the prototype, evaluating how they work. He also noted that Sandra Puscarcik will be overseeing the coordination of information in the kiosks and also said that the City is at least three to six months away from having a sufficient number of kiosks on site to begin to take up the slack that is presently served by the sandwick boards. It was noted that Council had decided to fund four kiosks this first year. Mr. Jones said that the four proposed locations are one at City Hall, one at the Police Station, one being proposed for the Municipal Parking Lot on South High Street and the fourth location has been targeted for the Chamber of Commerce site He said that other locations that have been discussed are the Municipal Swimming Pool and Avery Road Park. As to purchase by private developers, Mr. Jones said that one is to be installed at Muirfield Square Shopping Center, and that the Adirondack Corporation had agreed to purchase one but that due to the number of vacancies in that shopping center that they have no immediate plans for installation of same. Ms. Maurer suggested that the area around the AMC Theatre might be a good location. Mr. Campbell said he would like to see something on the agenda in the next couple of months for discussion about ordering the rest of the kiosks and to discuss also the tightening up the enforcement on the sandwick boards. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS MinUteS of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DA N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Seventeen Mr. Sutphen said that he would prefer not ordering any additional kiosks until the ones in place have been "road tested" through at least one winter. 2. Wondered if anyone knew whether Dublin has gotten bumped further down the budget in Columbus as a result of the activity on Polaris and the new Wexner center. Mr. Hansley said that water and sewer improvements are absolutely separate from the capital improvements budget, mentioning such things as the west branch sewer or a water tower, etc. He also said that it was the City's understanding that the west bank sewer is included in Columbus's five year sewer budget. 3. Requested that the booster pump station at the corner of Brand Road and Dublin Road be repainted; that the present color is totally unsatisfactory. Mr. Hansley said that there seems to be a security problem there in that children are using it as a skateboard park and that the City is considering fencing or some other measure to make it more secure. 4. Need to deal with the issue of the relocation of utility lines; burying versus relocation behind property lines, noting that a developer at Tuttle Crossing is waiting for Council to make a decision. 5. Thanked the Parks and Recreation staff for their organization and hard work in a relatively short period of time with regard to the community center issue. 6. Requested that his name be put up as a member of Council on the sign board at the front of the building and that Mr. Jankowski's name be taken down. Mr. Sutphen 1. Reported that at a recent Public Safety Committee Meeting that there was a request from the Police Department to seriously consider the K-9 program. It was noted that Upper Arlington dropped their K-9 program recently primarily because of an overtime pay issue. Chief Ferrell said that he could think of six to 12 instances in the past year when the K-9 was used. It was noted that Lt. Geis's position is that when the Police Department gets about 200 alarams a year at a warehouse, etc. that an officer would much rather stand outside and send the dog in to sniff. It was also noted that there is a positive public relations aspect to the program with schools, youth groups, etc. Ms. Maurer said that she would like more information, that information being give to the Public Safety Committee being made available to the rest of Council. Ms. Maurer 1. Mentioned a letter that was in the Council packets from David and June Turnberg with information regarding the Education Foundation for Foreign Study Program and their wish to get more families involved in the program. 2. There will be a Goal Setting Meeting on September 7, 1990 at the Chamber of Commerce building. The purpose of the meeting will be to prioritize goals and that members of Council hopefully will have the requested information from staff prior to the meeting. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DA N LEGAL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148 Held August 6, 1990 19 Page Eighteen Also noted that Mr. Foegler will have an inventory of capital improvements as well. 2. Will be planning a dinner with the Councils, City Managers, and Mayor of Upper Arlington, Worthington and Hilliard. It was mentioned that for a future dinner that Plain City and Powell might be considered. 3. Said that the woman who is the teacher of all the step dancing students in Columbus who herself is a native of Dublin, Ireland, is taking a group of 50 students to the Soviet Union and wondered if Council would provide them with Dublin buttons to take along. It was pointed out that Council had refused to appropriate money to representatives of an athletic team who would be traveling, and Mayor Rozanski did not feel that it would be appropriate to do it for one group and not another. 4. Need to appoint another member to the Construction Appeals Board. 5. With regard to the late applicant for the Solid Waste Advisory Board, Mr. Strip said that he thought that Council had a moral obligation to appoint that person to that Board. Mr. Strip 1. The Boy Scout Park entryway is superb and whoever did the developing, installing, planning, etc. did a superb job and is to be commended. Ms. Newcomb said that she had designed the entryway and that it was installed by the Parks Department. 2. Status of Muirfield Drive extension. Mr. Willis said that staff is reviewing the engineering now and that they will be returned to the consultant with a few minor changes. Noted that the project will be ready to bid by the time the formal resolution process has been completed, and Mr. Smith said that he had met with bond counsel in an effort to speed up the process. Mr. Strip said that Council had pledged several times to start the project in 1990, and that he would like to keep that pledge, even if it is only to turn a spade of dirt yet this year. Mayor Rozanski 1. Status of Billingsley Ditch improvements? Culvert? Mr. Foegler said that after Council made the formal selection of the preferred option that staff went back to the consultant and requested a formal engineering proposal; that proposal was just received and is being reviewed by the engineering staff. Mr. Sutphen moved to adjourn to exectuve session at 11:15 P.M. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. ~ i .-c-~~..%. Mayor - esi g Officer f ~i~LQin.~~~I ~7 ~~c~~ ~k of Cou cil