Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/05/1989 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK GO.. FORM NO. 1014 Hel 19 _ The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council was called to ~ order by Vice-Mayor David P. Amorose at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, June 5, 1989. Mr. Jankowski led the Pledge of Allegiance I - ~ Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Jankowski, Mrs. King, Ms. ~ Maurer, Mr. Strip, Mr. Sutphen. Mayor Rozanski was absent. i Mr. Strip moved to approve the minutes of the May 15, 1989 meeting of Dublin city council. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. ~ Vote - Mr. Sut hen es• Mr. Stri es• Mr. Amorose es• Mr. ankowski es•i p y p, y y > ' y Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Mr. Sutphen moved to approve Mr. Ronald Ferrell, in the absence of Manager, j Timothy Hansley and Finance Director, Ms. Prushing, the appointment of Mr. Ronald Ferrell as Acting City Manager. Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. ~~I Vote on the motion - Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; ~ j Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. ~ I Mr. Mitchell Banchefsky, Assistant Law Director was present as were the i following senior members of the City staff: Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Ferrell, Mr. Harding, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Jordan, Mr. McDaniel, and Mr. Willis. Correspondence i, ~ 1. Acknowledgment of a thank you note from Mrs. Frances Shawan for Council's remembrance at the death of former Council member, Mr. Jacob Shawan. j 'i II 2. There was no objection to a request from C. L. Finkes, 7592 Riverside Drive, for a new C-2 liquor permit. 3. There was no objection to a request from Patrick Grabill, 7030 to 7066 Muirfield Boulevard for a new C-1 liquor permit (beer for carryout). i I~~ 4. There was no objection to a request from Ronald Leslie, 3929 W. Dublin- !~I Granville Road for a new F-5 permit (Shamrock Square). ~ i ~ Ordinance No. 35-89 - Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning on a 10.85 ~ Acre Tract Located on the West Side of Avery Road and East of Tullymore Drive. Public Hearing. There were no registering proponents or opponents. Mr. Bowman had the following comments with regard to the site: i. Subject site is 10.85 acres located west of Avery Road, east of Tully- more and over 2000 feet north of Post Road. 2. To the north is the Wexford Woods subdivision that is zoned P.U.D.; to the south is the Lowell Trace subdivision which is also zoned P.U.D. 3. The applicant is requested combined concept and preliminary plan to the I P.U.D. classification. 4. Showed one slide of the site. With regard to the bikeway Mr. Bowman said that the plan is to get the bike path built through the subject site. Mrs. King asked about roadway width, wondering if it were wide enough for a school bus, fire engine, etc. Mr. Bowman said that it will be a 26' street which will be similar to the ones in Indian Run Meadow, Hemingway, etc. I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK GO., FORM NO. 10148 June 5, 1989 1J Hel '~iPage Two i ~i ~I The narrowness of some of the cul-de-sacs in Muirfield was mentioned; someone I~suggested placing No Parking signs, perhaps, on one side of the street in those particularly narrow cul-de-sacs. . Mr. Bowman suggested that it perhaps may be necessary to have two lanes that go all the way around the cul-de-sac so that if someone is parked on the ~ outside of the radius that one can still get a car around. Mr. Dan Terlecki, representing the property owner to the north, said that he ~ supported the rezoning application. He went on to say that he was hopeful that the developers of this site would implement an extensive program to save i the trees, in particular along the south property line, noting that he had had an extensive program of tree protection when building his Wexford Woods subdivision. Mrs. Fillman requested that perhaps the tall white pine trees at the end of the driveway could be saved. I ~ Mr. Bowman pointed out that the bike path could go around vegetation suc as the trees. Mr. Bowman reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the ' ~,Irequest with the following conditions: ~ 1. Dedication of right-of-way along Avery Road (30 feet from centerline) consistent with the Community Plan. 2. Reconciliation of acreage on plan and in text with regard to park. j 3. Dedication of easement between two lots at the end of the cul-de-sac to connect with Avery Road bike path and construction of a bike path within that easement. ~ 4. Work out storm water retention with the City Engineer to be provided either on site or with the resizing of the existing Lowell Trace basin. i 5. Regard the drainage ditch along the Avery Road frontage, including the installation of the the to eliminate the steepness of the ditch and provide proper drainage. 6. Removal of the fence requirement on both the south and north boundaries of the site, and the evergreens to remain. ' Mr. Bowman noted that the developer had agreed to build the bike path. There are still some storm water questions that can be worked out easily enough with the Engineer. The fence that was agreed to was to protect the Fillman's horses and pro- perties; there will be a six foot fence on the south side and a combination of a shorter fence and landscaping on the north side in Wexford Woods. It ~ was also felt that with regard to maintenance of the areas around the fencing that the two property owners should arrive at some sort of compromise; that if ~I ~ the condition continues to exist that it be shared equally on both sides of the property line rather than for one person to maintain the burden of land- scaping on his larger lot (Mr. Terlecki). j Mr. Bowman said that staff would handle the situation. ~ There will be a third reading of the Ordinance on Monday, June 19, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. Ordinance No. 45-89 - Ordinance Amending Penalty Provisions Within the Dublin Codified Ordinances. Public Hearing. There were no registering proponents or opponents. There will be a third reading of the Ordinance on Monday, June 19, 1989. Ordinance No. 39-89 - Ordinance Adopting Rules and Regulations for the Protect- ion and Preservation of Parks, Reservations of, Land, Green Space and Other Lands Open to the Public in the City of Dublin. Third Reading. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BL4NK GO.. FORM NO. 10148 III Hel Junes, 1989 19 I! Page Three I Mr. Sutphen moved to pass the Ordinance as an emergency measure. Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. 4 Vote on the motion - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. i Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. I i~ Vote on the Ordinance - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. I Ili Ordinance No. 46-89 - Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of $1,200,000.00 ' Notes for the Earlington Swimming Pool (renewal). First Reading. li Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. S. Hoffman, Income Tax Administrator, said that it was staff's intention to issue the notes for six months and then at that time staff would hope to I go to the bonding procedure. i ',i It was also noted that the notes would be issued at the existing rate, not the 'i~ rate that the City had before. I~ I Mrs. King moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. ill Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. ~'I »N II~~ Ordinance No. 47-89 - Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of $2,200,000.00 ~i ii Notes for the Avery Road Water Tower (renewal). First Reading. i 'III Mrs. King introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. iii Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; i ~I Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. III Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. i Ordinance No. 48-89 - Ordinance to Accept the Lowest/Best Bid for Monterey I i Drive Improvements. First Reading. it Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. I, Mr. Amorose explained that he had been asked that the Ordinance be given a first reading only, that it not be acted upon as an emergency until staff can come back to Council with a recommendation on funding. Ms. Maurer moved to amend the Ordinance to delete the emergency clause. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Mr. Willis suggested leaving the emergency clause in and treating the a Ordinance as a first reading. Ms. Maurer withdrew her amendment. There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the Dublin City Council Meeting on Monday, June 19, 1989. Ordinance No. 49-89 - Ordinance to Authorize Establishment of Drug Enforcement Fund for Use by the Dublin Police Department. First Reading. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. EORM NO. 10148 I Held June 5, 1989 19 IIPage Four Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Strip moved to amend the Ordinance by adding, in Section 3. the following ~ sentence "An accounting of funds will be rendered not less than quarterly". I~ u I Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. ;Vote on motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. 'Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. ms. Maurer moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency~l Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. ~,IVote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. li Vote on Ordinance - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. Ordinance No. 50-89 - Ordinance Authorizing a New Position - Director of Development. First Reading. j Mrs. King introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Harding said that he felt that it would 22 to 3 months before such an individual were "on board". Ms. Maurer said, after she read the job description, she was confused as to what direction the City would be moving in - would this be a technical-type ~ person, overseeing the development of plans, zoning, as well as managing the engineering and building departments or would this person would be more i of a "public relations-type", recruiting businesses, getting out in the community, etc. ~~Mr. Harding, speaking for Mr. Hansley, said that he felt that it really was a mixed position, a combination of the two persons as described in the previous paragraph. He also said that Mr. Hansley would like to have this person hired by I~September 1 of this year. ~~It was decided that with regard to the job description that if any member of ~~Council had questions or concerns that they make those, along with their suggestions, known to Mr. Harding who will work on re-drafting the job ~ description. ~ I Mr. Maurer moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency Mrs. King seconded the motion. ,Note on the motion - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. ~~Sutphen, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes. jVote on the Ordinance - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Resolution No. 14-89 - Resolution Regarding Posting of Approved Ordinances and Resolutions in the City of Dublin. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Resolution. Ms. Maurer reported that current ordinances and resolutions passed by the Dublin City Council are posted at Dublin TV, Dublin Public Library and the Dublin Barber Shop. The Dublin TV Location was used because that was where citizens went to purchase automobile registrations, driver's licenses, plates, etc. i She noted that the proposed legislation would arrange for the posting of ordinances and resolutions at Dublin City Hall, Dublin Public Library and the Dublin Chamber of Commerce building. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting - DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 June 5 1989 Held 19 i li Page Five III I I~ ~Mr. Sutphen moved to amend the Resolution to include the Dublin Barber Shop ~to Section 1. Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. Vote on the amendment - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. I Ms. Maurer commented that with regard to the Chamber of Commerce building that she felt it important that the display area be in a location that is open to lthe public. i!~Mrs. King moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency.) !~Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. '~IVote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mrs. ~ King, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Vote on Resolution - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes. )Resolution No. 15-89 - Resolution in Opposition to Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. j Proposed Rate Increase. First Reading. Mr. Strip introduced the Resolution. Several Council members expressed a concern, noting that as much as they are opposed some rate increases that they could not in good conscience vote on a ;I Resolution such as this without some additional corroborating information. ~ Council requested that they be given additional information before voting on ~ I~ the Resolution. i Mhere will be a second reading of the Resolution at the Council Meeting on ~ i onday, June 19, 1989. i Vice-Mayor Amorose announced that the topic of Denial of Corridor Development District Pursuant to Section 1185(e)(6) would be moved to the end of the ' agenda. I Accept Easement-Olde Poste Properties i Mr. Strip moved to accept the easement. IMr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on acceptance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. (Jankowski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes. ~I Request for Approval of Final Plat - Coventry Woods, Section II Mr. Bowman's comments were as follows: 1. This will be the Second Phase of Conventry Woods - 50 acres, 91 lots. 2. Will extend Coventry Woods out to Brand Road and S.R. 745. ~3. The plan shows it will be Low Density Residential. 4. 9.5 acres of the creek has been allotted for park purposes. A second park area is shown at the Brand Road intersection. That would be used as an entry feature location as well as a location for the booster station. I5. The applicant is responsible for the construction of two stacking lanes on Brand Road and S.R. 745. 6. It was agreed that approximately three-tenths of an acre of park land will be brough in as a part of this phase; the developer agreeing to pay for that three-tenths of an acre. It is also still expected that the land will be dedicated as a future phase of the subdivision. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting l~7eeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 it ii Held T,,,,o s, , aRa - - 19 I I ~ Page Six Ij l II i~ 7. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval with the following~~ conditions: I~ A. Deferment of the three-tenths of an acre of parkland in addition to II payment of the park fee for same. B. Coordinating street trees with the Landscape Planner. ii C. Provide staff with revised plat indicating storm water easement of ~ Lot 74 and correction of no-build zones. D. Installation of the bike path along the park and along S.R. 745 at li the time of street construction. E. The entryways will be at Chaddington and Coventry Woods. ~I 'i F. Reserve D is an additional reserve, reserved for some possible use in the future and, if not, will probably be dedicated to surround- ing property owners. Regarding the adjacent property owner, Mrs. Kay Wagner, Mr. Driscoll that they are planning to hook up her sewer. i ~j Ms. Maurer suggested that perhaps the developer might wish to substitute I a different street name for Chatelaine Drive, mentioning the derivation of ~ the word Chatelaine. Mr. Strip moved to approve the Final Plat - Coventry Woods, Section II. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote - Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen,yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes. I Request for Approval of Preliminary Plat - Tuttle Crossing ~I Mr. Bowman had the following comments: I~ 1. The subject site is approximately 115 acres. it 2. It is multi-use development. 3. The site involves an interchange being constructed by the developer at I-270 and Tuttle Road. , 4. The applicant is requesting approval of the Preliminary Plat which includes most of the roadways in connection with the project in Dublin. ! 5. The two main roadways are Parkcenter Boulevard which will be the main east/west road which will run from Frantz Road back to Blazer Parkway, ~ extending near the Borror Corporation building and the cancer building. That road will taper down to a 36' road within a 60' right-of-way. 6. The main north/south road will be Blazer Parkway which will be built as a boulevard street with a landscaped median at a 100' right-of-way. ~ 7. A major entry feature is proposed at the intersection of Blazer Parkway and Tuttle Road. ~ 8. The site contains 10 Lots and three reserves in addition to the streets. 9. Major entry features are also proposed at the intersection of Blazer Parkway and Tuttle Road. Another entrypoint was discussed with the developer. It was agreed that the decision could be deferred until such time as more development is known and the exact location of some of the users; then the location of the drive will be discussed. ~ 10. Code requires that the sidewalks be built on both sides of the street; however, staff would support an alternative bike/pedestrian plan with the development. 11. Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with the following conditions: A. Correction of the pavement setback lines on all streets to conform with zoning development standards. B. Curb cut restrictions to be added to text to assure safe traffic movement on Tuttle Road. I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dub 1 in C ity Counc i 1 Meeting 1~Zeeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 1014 ~i Held- June 5, 1989 it - I ~ Page Seven I~ ~ I a I I C. Commitment to resolve second access oint issues P consistent with traffic/development volumes. r It was noted that at the Planning Commission meeting that Mr. Jeffrey Brown requested that items ,~2 and #3 be addressed when Reserve C is developed/re- platted. Ms. Clarke noted that this was acceptable to staff. I~ It was noted that this all would set the alignment for the extension of Blazer Parkway which Councilhas discussed. i Mrs. King asked if any thought had been given to the boulevarding of Tuttle ~ II Road, perhaps just that portion of the road that is in Dublin. I ~ ~ Mr. Bowman noted that only a very small portion of Tuttle Road is in Dublin and that it is actually being constructed by Mr. Edwards through the City of Columbus as well; that from Blazer Parkway east will not be divided. Mr. Bowman said that he understood that it had been considered but was not ~ followed up on because of the need for additional right-of-way on the south it side of the road. ~ Mr. Strip suggested that this would be an ideal time to pursue the idea of implementing another gateway to the City, one at Tuttle Road, Frantz Road I~ before the bulldozers are used, before mounding and Landscaping are put into place, etc. Mr. Driscoll said that the applicant would be spending $600,000.00 for the landscaping of the interchange as well as the intersection at Blazer Parkway and Tuttle Road (large trellises, pillars, etc.). I i Responding to a question, Mr. Bowman noted that the new section of Frantz Road would have a median that would be four feet narrower than that which is in ~ place now. ~I He also noted that there would be sidewalks on both sides of Frantz Road as I well. I I~ Mr. Jankowski moved to approve the Preliminary Plat, Tuttle Crossing. ii Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; I Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes. Comments from Staff Chief Ferrell 1. Reported that the Dublin Police Department, as of June 1, 1989, has i direct dispatching services available. Mr. Willis 1. Reported that the County Commissioners will be hearing a request by the City of Columbus to annex the right-of-way of Sawmill Road except for that portion which is in Dublin. He said that it did not make sense to him for the road to be in two jurisdictions, specifically resulting in difficulties for the Police I~ Department. Council, generally, was in agreement to adjusting the boundary line in the area after the remainder of the street has been annexed to Columbus. Mrs. King suggested that Columbus adopt a "Dublin-style plan" for keeping the weeds down. I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dub 1 in City Counc i 1 Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 HelcL June 5, 1989 l g I I I Page Eight 'I I 2. The contractor doing the 1989 Street Improvement Program has asked the li City to consider allowing them to pave three or four nights on Frantz Roa so that the paving can be done during the time when traffic is less likely to be disturbed. It was su ested that the ~ gg residents in the area be given appropriate ~ notice if this is to be done. i Mr. Harding ~I 1. Mentioned the successful new employee reception which was held on I~ ~I Wednesday, May 24, 1989 and thanked Council members who were in attendance for coming. Ms. Jordan 1. The Municipal Swimming Pool opened on the Saturday prior to Memorial Day. 2. Reminded those present of the Olde Dublin Paint-Out to be held on Saturday. Mr. Bowman 1. Announced there would only be one Plannin and Zonin Commi g g ssion meeting in June. i Mr. Willis. A ~ 1. Mentioned the memorandum regarding the five project bid openings which will be occurring on Friday. i ~I Comments from Citizens it I ~ Mrs. Linda Pomante had the following comments: 1. Own a piece of property on the corner of Avery Road and Post Road. 2. Are concerned with the development going on in the area. ii 3• Would like to see an access onto the new Avery Road from the old Avery Road;since it is already in existence it could be easily done. I 4. There are also owners of two lots further north on Avery Road that jl also need access onto Avery Road. Mr. Bowman said that a decision as to how far Avery Road is being moved in that area has not been made; that they will be trying to minimize the ~ number of curb cuts. i I ' S. Have not had an opportunity to voice their opinions before the Post Road Civic Association regarding the proposed cul-de-sac. There are other alternatives, such as shutting off all of the roads going onto Post Road from the Industrial Park ~ Mr. Bowman said that there would be a public discussion on this matter before a final decision is made on what to do with Post Road. It was agreed that property owners would be notified individually. Council Roundtable Discussion Mrs. King 1. Wondered about the status of the abandoned cement block garage at the corner of Bright and Bright and Sawmill Roads. Mr. Bowman said that his department would review the matter and report back to Council. He did say that the Sawmill Baptist Church no longer owned the property but that it was owned by Mr. Bob Miller of Millco. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 I~ II Held June 5, 1989 19 ~ i Page Nine I I~ 2. Mentioned Mr. Terlecki and about the City's cooperative efforts with him to preserve the trees in the Wexford Woods Subdivision. Wondered if it .,,._a would be possible to apply these same standards to other subdivisions containing these types of wooded areas. I Mr. Bowman said that he agreed with Mrs. King but that there is a policy issue involved as well as to placement of utility lines. He noted that traditionally utilities are placed on the outside of the street so one does not have to dig up the street for maintenance purposes, but that if the utilities are placed in the street that much more vegetation is saved. Suggested discussions on the topic at either Public Service or Land Use ~ ~ Committee meetings. f Mrs. King said that she felt that it was a consumer protection issue as I well as an aesthetic issue; a consumer pays top dollar for a treed lot ~ but then does not have a treed lot after the home is put in. I Mr. Sutphen 1. Mentioned the accumulation of storm water at several areas within the City, specifically mentioning the area at Kinross and Leven Links. The Engineer's estimate presently is $10,000.00 to $16,000.00 to "get the water correctly off the road". Said he would like Council to authorize this expenditure. ~ Mr. Willis said that this year, because the budget for the street repair -.F, program was considerably less, that these types of projects were not considered as part of this year's program. Several Council members said that they would like to know where the monies would be coming from in the budget before making a decision. Mr. Amorose suggested that the Engineering Department conduct a survey ~ of the intersections in the community that do not have curbs and gutters and make a recommendation to Council. ~i Ms. Maurer ~ 1. The Land Use Committee has been pursuing the idea of development of a method and means for purposes of advertising community meetings and other types of information. Noted that several of the shopping center owners have expreessed an interest in cooperating. 2. Would in the near future like to present draft legislation for the hiring of a Special Events Director for the City of Dublin. Requested that members of Council share their ideas, etc. for a job description. 3. Mentioned the selection by the Dublin Arts Council of the winner in a local contest, and noted that a replica of the winning entry was on display in the Conference Room. I 4. Discussion regarding way(s) to expedite the relationship between Council and the Convention and Visitors Bureau. Mr. Jankowski said that he thought that that was Mrs. Erickson's position and that she could report to or talk to members of Council about concerns,) etc. at any time. A committee of Mr. Vern Metz, and Council's two representatives, Cathy Erickson and William Denihan, has been appointed to deal with the issue of policy. 5. Additional suggested topics for Executive Session (Clerk of Council's position and responsibilities), an update on current litigation, and a discussion of Ms. Clarke's memorandum, and discussion of Mr. Dick Porter's suggested appointments to the Construction Appeals Board. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin city council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 it Held June 5, 1989 19 - Page Ten Mr. Strip d 1. Members of Dublin City Council are still talking with the City of Columbus toward a resolution of issues which are creating division between the parties involved. At 9:31 P.M. Mr. Jankowski moved to adjourn to Executive Session for discussion of the Denial of Corridor Development District. j Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. i Vice-Mayor Amorose called the meeting back to order at 10:01 P.M. ~I Review of Denial of Corridor Development District Pursuant to Section 1185(e)(6 I I~~Ms. Maurer pointed out the plot plan requirements as written in the Planning I and Zoning Code, Section 1185.06(e)(3) which several members of Council felt shad not been followed as per this application. ~ i Plot Plan required. The application shall be accompanied by copies of a I plot plan drawn to an appropriate scale showing the following: i A. The boundaries and dimensions of the lot. B. The size and location of existing and proposed structures. ~ I! C. The proposed use of all parts of the lot and structures, including accessways, walks, off-street parking and loading spaces, lighting ~ ~ and signage locations, screenin landsca III g, ping treatment and other 'I such information required to demonstrate the development standards. D. A11 reserve parcels and anticipated development phases. ~ I I i, E. The use of land and location of structures on adjacent property. She also noted that the scale had been drawn very small (1" to 30') and that it was very difficulty to read. Ms. Maurer also noted that the Planning and (Zoning Commission which also had difficulty had an even smaller scale to read. i ~~Ms. Maurer also noted that the plan before Council was not the plan reviewed ~by the Planning and Zoning Commission and suggested that the applicant present (the new plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission, saying that Council does not disagree with the proposed uses but that the other requirements as ,outlined above have not been complied with, mentioning specifically adjacent property uses. ~Mr. R. Lavinsky, representing the applicant Mr. Bob Miller, told Mrs. King that Millco Properties will be glad to tear down the garage-type building at th corner of Bright and Sawmill Roads that she had mentioned earlier. Mr. Lavinsky agreed that Council should have been reviewing the plan submitted Ito the Planning and Zoning Commission. He noted that what was before Council flat this meeting was a preliminary attempt to take into account some of the (concerns of members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Amorose said that the scale should be 1" equals 20' or larger and he summarized the conditions in Section 1185.06(e)(3) of the Planning and Zoning Code as had Ms. Maurer. He also said that the presentation at the Planning ,and Zoning Commission meeting was not sufficient enough to allow the members a real opportunity to evaluate what was being planned, especially on a scale of 1" to 40' scale. It was noted that the stadium buildings have already been approved. Mr. Lavinsky said that he believes that the project has been upgraded - creation of additional parking spaces, addition of landscaping and widening of green space by 5 feet. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes Of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 ii Held June 5, 1989 19 I Page Eleven ~i Mrs. King said that she would prefer the application go through the process the way that it is suppoed to, with the information that the Planning and ~ Zoning Commission is suppoed to, so that the decisions that are made are made by the people who are suppoed to make them. It was decided that, with the agreement of the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, that there would be a special meeting of the Commission scheduled for Thursday, June 15, 1989 to hear this application again. ~ ~I Ms. Maurer moved to adjourn the meeting to Executive Session at 10:33 P.M. ~ Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; j Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. ~I i~ I I~ M r - Presid' Officer li I~ I! i I I I i ~ I C~Ierk of Cou cil ~ I I I