Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/04/1987 " RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ICS IHeeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4, 1987 19 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin Village Council was called to order by Mayor Michael L. Close at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, May 4, 1987. Mr. Rozanski led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mayor Close, Mr. Jankowski, Ms. Maurer, and Mr. Rozanski. Mr. Sutphen was absent. Mr. Thornton was also absent (excused). Mr. Smith, Law Director, was present as was Ms. Prushing, Acting Village Manager. Members of the Village Staff present were: Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Darragh, Mr. Harding, Ms. Jordan, Chief Mayer, and Mr. Olausen. Mr. Amorose moved to approve the minutes of the April 20, 1987 meeting of the Dublin Village Council. Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Rozanski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Jankowski, abstain; Mayor Close, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes. Mr. Amorose moved to approve payment of the bills. Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. The vote was 5-0 in favor of paying the bills. There was no correspondence read at the meeting. Mayor Close moved up from under the heading "Other" the appeal from the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals, Dublin Phillips 66 to the first item on the agenda. Mr. Mark Sherer, the attorney representing Mr. Bettis, the owner of the station, explained that the case involves the attempted replacement of several identification signs located at his client's gasoline station at the corner of Bridge and High Streets. Mr. Sherer indicated that they are taking the position that these are legal, non-conforming signs, and under numerous decisions by the local courts and the State Sumpreme Court feel that they have the right to make the minimal changes to the sign (being simply a change in the business identification (the logo) from Phillips 66 to Marathon). He said that he felt that the changes would make the signs more conforming than they were previously. Ms. Maurer asked Mr. Sherer how he would respond to the Village's attorney' argument that a sign in the historic district should be treated differently than a "regular" sign. Mr. Sherer said that he thought that the question of whether a historic district supersedes a non-conforming right is one that will be brought before the court in this particular case. He indicated that the cases that had been noted by the Village Law Director's Office that had been provided in the TRO hearing in this matter do not specifically address the historic district concept in the context of a non-conforming use; that the courts have accepted and validated the concept of a historic use but have not seen a case in which they have said that a historic designation can abrogatE ones that are non-conforming. He noted that the area was designated as a historic district several years ago, but that these signs have been in existence since the early 1960s. Mayor Close said that a"yes"vote would be an affirmance of the action of the Board of Zoning Appeals (that the sign should not be allowed in its present format). A "no" vote would mean that the voter does not agree with the action of the Board of Zoning Appeals, and that the sign as proposed by Mr. Bettis should be allowed to be put up. The vote was as follows: Mr. Jankowski, no; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Close, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ICS Meetillg National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ 1I cld May 4, 1987 19 Page Two Mayor Close mentioned that Resolution No. 09-87 - Community Reinvestment Area/Tax Abatement - has been prematurely placed on the agenda, as the area in question has not been determined and will not be introduced at this meeting, but will be introduced at the Council meeting on May 18th. Mayor Close repeated the fules for public hearings. Ordinance No. 03-87 - Rezoning of a 46.7~ Acre Tract on the West Side of S.R. 745 at the Delaware County line. Public Hearing. Registered proponents were: Mr. Jim Houk, Mr. Ben Hale, Jr., and Mr. Bob Webb. Registered opponents were: Mr. Steven Hillman and Mrs. Diane Nicholls. Mr. Bowman had the following comments: 1. The site contains 46.7 acres right at the Delaware County line, a little north of Memorial Drive's intersection with Dublin Road. 2. The applicant is requesting rezoning from R, Rural to PLR, Planned Low Density Residential. Mr. Bowman showed slides of the site. 3. The application was discussed twice at the Planning Commission - once at the March meeting and again in April. 4. The applicant met with the adjoining property owners and made a number of changes - reduced the number of lots and created a new street alignment. They have made a much better plan, one that became more compatible with the property owners on either side. 5. Two additional lots were dropped - one along the north side of the property line on a cul-de-sac to better preserve a cliff. Another lot was dropped along the south of the proposed road, ending up with a total of 67 units with a gross density of 1.45 units per acre. By the Code formula required in the PLR district, the density required is 1.88 dwelling units per acre. 6. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval with the following conditions: A. Dedication of right-of-way for 40 feet from centerline along Dublin Road. B. Commitment on contribution to left turn lane on Dublin Road. C. Commitment to work with the Parks Horticulturist on the western portion before placing utilities in order to preserve the major trees. D. Establishment of a no build zone along the park on the final plat. E. The elimination of one lot or as many lots as necessary, in order to accommodate the unique features and unique topography of the property, insuring that the slopes on either side of the subject site be protected. F. That the applicant vary the setback along the street, the main east/west street through the site; that the setback could be varied; the houses be placed closer to the road so that a larger no build zone would be preserved along the south property line (that the no build zone would be a 35' minimum along the rear of the lots that back up to Muirfield Phase 13). G. That all slopes be maintained at greater than 3 to 1 so that the trees can be maintained and so that a better angle would be in place in order that there be less erosion and sedimentation. H. The elimination of one of the lots along the south to better match up with those lots in the existing phases of Muirfield. Mr. Jim Houk discussed the character of the site, mentioning the drainage patterns, the woodland area, the cliff, etc. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4, 1987 19 Page Three Mr. Houk also made the following additional comments regarding the site: 1. In laying out the roadway the applicant tried as much as possible to follow the natural topography in the location, mentioning specifically the crossing over the stream at a place which would cause the least amount of damage. 2. As many trees as possible will be saved. 3. Have tried to expand and work off of the existing open space program that was established in Muirfield in Phase 1 and 13. 4. Have allocated a large portion, including the stream area, to have a 120' opening for the park where it crosses the roadway. S. Have tried to match the lot lines, and at the request of the residents and the Planning and Zoning Commission have pulled out two lots, one at the cul-de-sac, (have pulled that cul-de-sac down to give 200' from the edge of the property line to give a substantial building zone on top of the cliff( and one lot on the southern portion to match lot for lot "in through here". Mr. Hale said that Mr. Webb will be the builder and intends to build the entire subdivision at one time, hopefully this summer. Mr. Steven Hillman, a resident on the north side of this development, ex- pressed the following concerns: 1. There is no provision for water retention. There is a 30' dropoff into a creek which floods every time there is a hard rain. 2. The residents have continually objected to the density. 3. There has been no statement regarding the 30' cliff; what will happen when it is built upon. 4. With regard to the density. The density on this project is 67 lots. To the north there are 32 lots, to the south are 38 lots, to the west are 35 lots. 5. The donated land is useless in a portion. It has no access to it from anywhere; it would be useless to any citizen of Dublin. 6. There has been no work done to establish whether or not the building density along the north side will damage the creek bed. "I am going to tell you that it will; that is a clay embankment." 7. The amount of traffic onto Dublin Road will be excessive. 8. There should be 32 to 38 lots on this project and no more. Mrs. Diane Nicholls of Citizens for Better Planning said that they object to the plan for several of the reasons expressed by Mr. Hillman. She also asked if there had been a traffic study completed on S.R. 745. Mr. Bowman said that there had not. Mrs. Nicholls went on to say that no person has established the safety of S . R. 745. Mr. Amorose said that he felt that the Village needs to know what will be done as regards storm water retention/detention. Mr. Bowman said that they will comply with the storm water guidelines. Mr. Hale confirmed that they would not disturb any areas that had more than a three to one slope. There will be a third reading of Ordinance No. 03-87 at the Council meeting on May 18, 1987. Ordinance No. 22-87 - Rezoning of 95.657 Acres on the Northwest Corner of Post Road and Avery Road. Public Hearing. Mr. Ben Hale, Jr. and Mrs. Robyn Fillman of 7001 Avery Road registered as proponents. There were no registered opponents. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held Ma y 4, 1987 19 Page Four Mr. Bowman had the following comments: 1. The subject site is a 95.7 acre site located at the northwest corner of Post Road and Avery Road. 2. The applicant is requesting that the land be zoned from the R-1 classification to Planned Unit Development. 3. The applicant is proposing 99 single family lots and 13.6 acres of office and institutional use at the intersection of Post Road. Mr. Bowman showed slides of the site. 4. Staff had a number of concerns when they first looked at the site. The traffic circulation; how to maintain adequate traffic flow north and south through the whole quadrant. With regard to open space staff wanted that to be treated as sensitive ly as possible, as well as the Fillman piece which is not part of the application and which is currently a single family home, a horse farm. Mr. Bowman briefly discussed and described the tracts of land to the north of this site. He noted that they were concerned, given the amount of acreage, how to adequately get to the intersection or off to the west. He noted that one main criteria that staff felt that they had to impose was that this would be a strong collector, be unloaded, without lots and driveways, so that traffic can adequately move up and down. 5. It was agreed that any access to the proposed park land would be from Post Road. 6. A traffic engineer looked at what volumes of traffic might be generate and felt that those volumes in combination with what would be on Muirfield Boulevard, that the boulevard could adequately handle that number; the traffic that would be generated from the northwest quadrant. It was noted that if there were a strong connector the boulevard would be adequate to handle the traffic flow and take it on out to the AVery Road interchange. 7. The plan preserves most of the open space. The roadway goes around the Fillman property. What it does is provide for a street that does not have any driveway/curb cuts from the eastern edge of the park, looping down into the Rausch residence, intersecting Muirfield Drive across from Valley Stream Drive. That road could be controlled. It might also take some of the traffic off of Tara Hill. The road would go along the west side of the park; provisions have also been made so that it would also (should Dublin expand( that road could be continued on down and intersect Post Road closer to the Post Road interchange. Mr. Bowman said that with the connection that was made, the preservation of the open space, the density of the single family proposal, staff recommended approval of the plan as did the Planning Commission with the following conditions: 1. That there be a better definition of housing style and proposed deed restrictions. 2. That acceptable access to the park be provided. 3. That the final road network be examined with a traffic engineer. 4. There was concern about the office/institutional at the corner; what type of development controls should be imposed "up front" at the rezoning. The text that was submitted with the application was changed to read _ "The office/institutional portion of this property shall be developed in a cohesive fashion and campus-like with a maximum density of 10,000 square feet per acre, similar to Red Roof and O. M. Scott-" 5. In the second sentence of that same paragraph it was moved to delete the words, "the developer at the time", and insert "the developer prior to the submission of the final development plan approval shall provide a comprehensive plan for the office/institutional ground". RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of - Dublin Village Council Meeting ~tb M eetillg National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ II eld May 4, 1987 19 Page Five Mr. Ben Hale, Jr. had the following comments: 1. Discussed the road as it applied to Mrs Fillman's property. 2. The development is divided into two phases. The first phase will be built as one phase with 96 single family lots. The second phase will be designated as open space and will be dedicated to the Village as a park preserve. 3. The street then can go through the park; Scioto Valley Morgage property can tie into this and subsequently go on up further north to service those properties. 4. The office/institutional shown on the plan, was shown as commercial on the original Trott and Bean paIn. 5. The storm drainage on the site goes into the South Fork of Indian Run. The detention pond will be a wet pond in the park area, as per request of the Parks and Recreation Department. 6. The bikeway system will be built in the first phase so that when the park area is "turned over" to the Village all of the bike system will be in place. 7. The lots will be 80' (Hemingway and Warlington size lots). Mrs. Fillman of 7001 Avery Road requested that it be noted that a 6' wood privacy fence will be built all around her property by the applicant. Mrs. Fillman also expressed concern regarding the office portion and the resulting traffic on Avery Road. She said that she did not like the office/institutional but did like the single-family section. Mr. Cline, speaking for some contiguous property owners, said that they felt that the office/institutional is one of the more positive aspects of the development; that this is a corner with commercial potential; the Trott and Bean study indicated that. He indicated that they have been very concerned about the community commercial designation that was recommended by Trott and Bean. Mr. Jankowski asked Ms. Jordan if the specifications of this particular bike path coincide with what the Village has been trying to develop as regards the bikeway transportation system. Ms. Jordan said "yes", but that it will be worked into when finalizing the mapping of the entire Village. She indicated that the bikeway study should be completed this year. There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the Council meeting of May 18, 1987. Ordinance No. 33-87 - Rezoning of 1.713 Acres on the West Side of Avery Road, South of U.S. 33/S.R. 161. Public Hearing. Mr. Weil registered as a proponent. There were no registered opponents. Mr. Bowman had the following comments: 1. This is a 1.7 acre site located on the west side of Old Avery Road. 2. The application is for Planned Unit Developed zoned from the General Industrial District. 3. One use would be for office/warehouse and the other would be for a bymnastics facility. 4. The subject site is approximately 275 square feet; the gymnastics facility would be used for sports' classes for children of all ages. S. The parking lot will accommodate 69 cars. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS At inutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ICS Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ II eld Ma y 4, 1987 19 Page Six 6. Staff recommended approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended approval with the following conditions: A. That a revised landscape plan be corrected to comply with code; that evergreen material be used a little more as part of the screening. B. The bymnastics facility will not be used for competitions. C. The elevation that was shown at the Planning Commission would become part of the PUD submission. Mr. Bowman commented (regarding the number of parking spaces) that Code Enforcement really is done when the Village gets a complaint. Mr. Weil said that they have submitted a revised landscape plan which has been approved by the Planning Department; they have added evergreens. Mr. Amorose said that he felt that there should be additional evergreens. Mr. Weil said that they will be glad to comply with the request. Mr. Amorose said that the concern was with regard to looking down into the complex from Avery Road; if they could integrate some evergreen material into the front yard area, that would be an improvement. Mr. Weil said th~t they would be very glad to comply with that request. Mr. Rozanski commented on the damage done to Old Avery Road by the Anderson Concrete trucks; said damage not having been repaird. He indicatec that he felt that something should be done prior to granting approval to this rezoning. Mr. Weil said that he believes that the people from Anderson Concrete are currently meeting with the Dublin Engineering Department and are working on a plan to upgrade that road, but said that he had no connection whatsoever with that operation. Mr. Rozanski said that he would like to see something in writing. There will be third reading of the ordinance on May 18, 1987. Ordinance No. 17-87 - Proposal to Put Income Tax Increase on Ballot (Pre- viously Tabled). Third Reading. Mr. Jankowski said that he did not feel that Council had all the informatior needed to vote on the ordinance at the present time. He indicated that he felt that a study on the feasibility of using sur- charges or use fees needed to be done as well as perhaps building into the revenue projections the proposed hotel/motel bed tax. Ms. Prushing reported that she will be meeting shortly with representatives of the City of Columbus to go over progress on the west branch sewer. It was the recommendation of bond counsel that the Village should utilize the same engineering firm to do the study in terms of user fees or mortgage revenue bonds or some other alternate form of financing. Mr. Jankowski moved to table the ordinance until the second meeting in June (June 15, 1987). Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. Ordinance No. 32-87 - Authorize Agreement to Provide Fire Hydrant Main- tenance Services (Previously Tabled). Third Reading. The vote was unanimous in favor. Ordinance No. 34-87 - Annexation of 7.105! Acres in Washington Township to Dublin. Third Reading. The vote was 5-0 in favor. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4, 1987 19 Page Seven Ordinance No. 38-87 - Requiring Council Review and Approval of any Public Utilities Built by Any Political Subdivision. Third Reading. Mayor Close commented that he was in favor of what this ordinance intended to do. He did say, though, that he has reservations regarding whether or not the Village can do it as it is done here, and said that for that reason he cannot support the ordinance. Mayor Close said that he thought that probably an executive order out of the Manager's office, reaffirmed periodically, advising all the people in the building department or anyone issuing permits that they continue to keep Council apprised of this type of situation. Mayor Close went on to say that he liked the idea but did not agree with the process. He noted that staff is apprised that Council wants to be aware of sensitive areas. Mr. Amorose said that he felt that, at least temporarily, the Village did need this ordinance - during a time of rapid growth such as the Village is experiencing at the present time. Responding to a question from Ms. Maurer, Mr. Smith said that the purpose of the ordinance was for the Village to have something to certify to all of the adjoining municipalities to tell them that they could not come into Dublin to build a water tower or a high tension line, a waterline, a sewerline, etc. without coming before Council for review; that he tried to create a notice ordinance (that the Village cannot regulate but can give the utility companies notice that they must apprise the Village of their projects). Mr. Olausen said that the Village probably gets requests for a half dozen permits a week for utility work. He said that he thought that the purpose of the ordinance was that it referred to specific significant utilities. Ms. Maurer said that she felt that the distinction is is that it is some- thing that is put in by another governmental body. Mr. Olausen, responding to a question from Mr. Amorose, said that the utility decides where the equipment will be placed (such as the fiber optic vaults) and that the Village has the opportunity to review the plan and can ask them to change what they have shown on their plans as part of the permit. Ms. Maurer moved to table the ordinance. Mayor Close seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mr. Rozanski, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Close, no. Ordinance No. 39-87 - Implementing Interi Development Controls in the Northeast Quadrant. Third Reading. Mr. Jankowski said that he agreed with the ordinance but that he felt that it did not go "far enough" and that it should be extended to the entire community. The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor. Ordinance No. 43-87 - Creating a New Building Inspection Administrator/ Commercial Plans Examiner Position. First Reading. Mr. Rozanski introduced the ordinance, moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was 5-0 in favor. The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AI inutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ AJeeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4~ 1987 19 Page Eight Ordinance No. 44-87 - Approve a Change in the Name of a Street in Muirfield Subdivision. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance. Mr. Tim Horn, the owner of lot #973 in Muirfield, owner of one of the three lots that comprise a street known as Muirfield Run, was present at the meeting. Mr. Horn, representing the landowners on the street, said that there is no desire to change the name of the street from Muirfield Run by the owners of the lots on the street. Mayor Close explained that there was a request, originally, to change the name of the street from Muirfield Run to Balmohoy Court. He also said that from a safety standpoint that it was thought that perhaps the name Muirfield Run would be confusing, confusion resulting from the fact that there are street names already in place such as Muirfidl Drive and Muirfiel Place. In addition, Mayor Close said, Mr. Howard Adams made a representation at th last meeting that there was some agreement from the landowners to the chang in the name. Mr. Horn said that the landowners want to point out that they are not petitioning for a change; they think that the name Muirfield Run is appropriate. He also said that they had not been contacted by the post office or any other safety body that there would be a problem with the name being Muirfield Run. Mayor Close commented that the reason Muirfield Ltd. considered the issue was that as the landowner and developer in Muirfield they have named all of the streets, and they had not been informed when the name change was made the previous time. It was decided to hold the ordinance over for a second reading at the meeting of May 18, 1987, and to invite a representative of Muirfield to be present at the meeting. Mr. Horn said that, in his opinion, after reviewing the Ohio Revised Code that the people owning property on the street are in charge of the name for same. He noted that they are the people who own the property, will live there, and that they would like to have it stay just the way Council passed it before (Muirfield Run being the name of the street). Ms. Prushing noted that Mr. Howard Adams had sent letters to all three property owners and that he had gotten responses from two of those land- owners that indicated that they did not object to the street being named St. Boswels Court. She went on to say that Mr. Horn was sent a letter so that he would be awar that this issue would be on the agenda. Ordinance No. 45-87 - Accept Agreement with City of Columbus for Two Traffic Lights on Sawmill Road. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance. There will be a second reading of the ordinance on May 18, 1987. Ordinance No. 46-87 - Accept Contract with Dan Boothe, Inc. for Water Study for Community Plan. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the ordinance, moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor. The vote on the ordinance was 5-0 in favor. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ICS AJeetill" ,.., National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ H elcl Ma y 4, 1 98 7 19 Page Nine Resolution No. 07-87 - Authorizing Regulation of Traffic During Muirfield Tournament. First Reading. Mr. Rozanski introduced the Resolution. Mr. Rozanski moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. The vote was 5-0 in favor of the motion. Mayor Close commented that he felt that the Village had an obligation to continue to allow service vehicles access to the residences in Muirfield. The vote on the Resolution was unanimous in favor. Resolution No. 08-87 - Accept 0.297 Acre of Land for Right-of-way Purposes. First Reading. Ms. Maurer introduced the Resolution. Other Information Regarding Bright Road/Summitview Road Powerline - C&SOE Representative Mr. Fred Truban, supervisor, distribution engineering, Columbus and Souther Ohio Electric Company was present at the meeting. Mr. Truban said that C&SOE currently has a substation located west of Sawmill Road right about the Delaware, Franklin County line. He noted that they presently have a transmission line constructed on steel towers which extends south from the substation along the west side of Sawmill Road, south across Summit- view, Bright Road, and on south across the freeway. At the present time one set of conductors on that transmission line is not being utilized. They presently have a need to construct distribution lines from the Sawmill substation south to service the area developing along Sawmill Road. They would like to use the existing transmission right-of-way to construct the distribution line. The present plan is to remove the transmission conductors that are no longer being utilized, drop them down unto distri- bution poles so that they can provide distribution circuits to the south and also serve the area along the right-of-way as it develops. Telephone poles would be placed under the transmission lines. He noted that they have looked into the possibility of using the conductors in the present position, but it would not be feasible to do that. They presently have three conductors there to make a distribution line; they would have to add a fourth grounded conductor. The towers are not constructed in such a manner that that could be easily accomplished. It would be difficult to tap that conductor to serve customers, etc. Each time they would wish to tape that conductor they would be tapping it at a transmission structure which would make it extremely difficult when they would get down to Summitview and need to tie into the existing conductors there; there would be a major problem making the transition from the transmission conductors to the distribution lines along Summitview and, similarly, when getting to Bright Road they would have a similar problem. Also, as the area develops, any time a customer would come along and request service, they would have great difficulty in tapping the conductors. With regard to putting the lines underground, Mr. Truban said that they run into a serious problem when constructing major feeder exits running out of substations. When basically feeding from an overhead line, they can design and install a system which is fairly reliable and relatively economical. To maintain the reliability of service required, to do it underground would probably cost at least 20 times what it would cost to do it overhead. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AI il!utes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~~J:s Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4, 1987 19 Page Ten Mr. Truban said that it is true that at many of their substations they have underground feeder exits going out for a relatively short distance (a couple of hundred feet). He noted that with an overhead line it is relatively easy to see a problem and it takes a relatively short time to repair it. When one gets into a major feeder exit extending a great distance from a substation it can take a considerable length of time to locate the fault; up to as much as eight hours to determine where the fault is and much longer to repair the fault. For that reason, it is necessary to install duplicate facilities to increase the reliability. The underground facilities are more expensive, and when one gets into the duplication of facilities the cost becomes almost prohibitive. Mr. Truban said that it is C&SOE's wish to try to build overhead facilities at least into the perimeter of major developments and then to supply underground facilities through the subdivision, industrial parks, commercial parks, etc. The utility poles would be in the range of 55 feet in height. The present plan is that between the substation and Summitview there would be two sets of conductors with a neutral, which would be a total of seven conductors. Between Summitview and Bright Road the present plan is for four conductors. There would be approximately 240 feet between poles; the spacing on the towers would be approximately 1000 feet to 1200 feet, with approximately three to four poles between towers. Mr. Rozanski expressed a concern because he had not been aware that C&SOE was considering a substation around Sawmill Road and 1-270. It was noted that the distribution line will be basically serving the area - there will be two circuits coming south out of the station; one will come south to Summitview, the other will be coming south to Bright Road. Basically, they will be servicing the area between Bright Road, the county line, Sawmill Road, and Riverside Drive. Mr. Truban said that there is a good possibility with these two lines coming down from the north with additional lines coming in from the Lin- worth Road substation, that the need for this substation may be eliminated. He noted that they are looking at a unique type of substation which would be extremely small and compact, possibly one that could be built in the existing transmission right-of-way which is only 50 feet wide. Mr. Rozanski commented that it is much easier to repair overhead lines rather than underground lines, making certain that customers are not without electricity for a shorter period of time. Comments from Staff There were no additional comments from STaff. Comments from Citizens 1. Dr. Stoycheff asked Mr. Truban if it were possible for the Dublin Village Council to require C&SOE to put the lines underground. Mr. Truban said that he thought that when one would get into a situtation where C&SOE is forced into construction budgets that are extremely more costly in the Dublin area than what they are in other parts of the service territory that then they get into situations where it is possible that the utility commission gets involved; then they could get in the position of establishing different rates for different areas of their service territory. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ICS Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held May 4, 1987 19 Page Eleven Council Roundtable Discussion Mr. Jankowski 1. Mr. Jankowski tahnked Mrs. Gubanc of the Dublin Villager for what was perceived as a complimentary article in the paper. 2. Reported on the Manager Search Committee process. The Screening Committee has had several meetings and has worked very hard. The first task was to develop a profile of those characteristics which the Village wanted the new manager to have and that has been compiled. The second step was to screen the applicants against that particular profile. There were 71 applicants for the position. After the screening process was completed, there were seven candidates selected, which it was felt best met that particular profile. From that group of seven four individuals were selected for interviews That process will commence next week. The Search Committee will conduct a structured interview process with a particular candidate, to be followed by dinner; the next day will be spent at breakfast, meetings with staff, lunch, tours of the Village and industry, meetings with citizens, to be followed by a general reception in the evening. The idea is to involve as many members of the Search Committee, Counci and members of the Commissions of the Village in the screening process Mr. Rozanski 1. Expressed a concern that the residents along Brand Road were not informed regarding the construction of the waterline along Brand Road. A policy should be adopted to inform the residents when a major utility is going to come near their residences. 2. Reminded everyone that the intersection of Post Road and Coffman Road will be going to a three way stop on May 8, 1987, at 8:00 A.M. Mayor Close 1. Because of the Memorial Tournament during the latter part of May, there will be only one Mayor's Court in May and three during the month of June. The meeting was adjounred by the mayor at 9:45 P.M. ~ Mayor - Presiding Officer /) J~-Lo ~. '*~ Clerk of Cou cil Ace Truck Body, Inc. 402.10 Action Power Equipment 45.44 Athletic Club - Metro V 80.00 Attorney General's Office 15.00 Avery Road Gardens 550.00 Bob's Marathon 95.00 Britton, Carol 21.00 Browne, Floyd Assocs, Ltd. 2,600.00 ;entral Communications, Inc. 40.98 ;entral Ohio Police Supply 437.83 Century Equipment, Inc. 369.68 The Dickson Company 679.02 Dublin Express Printing 1,725.60 Dublin Villager 509.19 Early, Art 45.00 Erie Insurance Group 16,816.00 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 1,821.30 Gordon Flesch Company 64.97 Gall's, Inc. 171.20 Gingway Products, Inc. 38.00 Goodyear Tire 1,183.11 Hanley Business Forms 598.16 Headlee Office Supplies 119.25 Inside Outfitters 511.68 John David Jones 546.00 Key Blueprints 177.25 Kroger 8.76 Lakefront Trailways 100.00 Lambert's Coffee Service 248.79 Bobby Layman Chevrolet 166.48 Lotus 18.00 C.O. Lowe Sales, Inc. 28.00 T~on's Body Shop 129.00 . W. Mays, Jr. 46.00 cGowen, Nancy 20.00 Meijer 221.26 The Olen Corporation 376.08 Olsten Services 294.40 Paul Peterson Company 111.00 Rairer, Don 40.00 Rasche, Peggy 20.00 Ravneberg, Janet 20.00 Risk Management Publishing 80.00 Sandy, Inc. 78.00 Savko, Nicholas & Sons 1,500.00 Sears Roebuck 161.49 Software Solutions 311.37 TSI, Inc. 2,030.00 Tiley & Son 175.00 Tuller Printing & Graphics 31.52 Waste Management 194.00 Williams, Clyde & Assocs 1,035.64 Aire-Flo Corp 257.93 Days of Creation 250.00 Haslett Heating & Cooling 140.25 Henderson Aerial Surveys 75.00 BILL LISTING APRIL 30, 1987 Five (5) snowblades Tanaka Bar & tires for mower Membership fees for May Issues and Techniques in Police Evaluation 1 day Five (5) Crabapples & 20 Junipers Tailpipes for Truck #12 parts & labor Children's Breadbaking Engineering Svcs for Main sanitary sewer pump Police Department On-Off Switch Police Department Blazers, Trousers, Shirts Sharpening, grinding, bed knives, parts & labor Three (3) Pressure Recorders Parks & Rec Spring/Summer Brochure Parks & Rec Spring/Summer Ads Police Department (meals for training) Insurance Premium Repair Manholes & Fire Hydrants Copier Paper Seat Organizer for marked cruisers Steel Mesh for Trailer Repair Tires for Cruisers, Tractor, Mowers Printing of Checks Office Supplies Flexlum blinds for Police Department Engineer & Inspector Services Reel & Ranging Measure Cookies for Risk Management Seminar Senior Citizens Deposit for Bus Charter Coffee and associated supplies for office Repairs to cruiser #14 Lotus subscription Herbicide for flower beds Windshield Parks #2 Hammers (Three) for Maintenance Refund for antique class Fence Post and Rails Sand & Gravel for ball diamonds Temporary Help Signs and Posts (No Refund for Antiques Refund for Antiques Refund for Antiques Annual Renewal gravel for maintenance Installation of water taps Dump Cart for Parks & Rec Hardware Maintenance Telephone Lines for Office Cleaned sewer and ran line to manhole Case Cards Trash Pick-up Engineering Agreement for Signal Installations Checked & Repaired Heating System Kids Arts Festival May 16, 1987 Repairs to Alc in Police Department Aerial mylar enlargement Parking, class class class Fire Lane) Bill Listing for April 30, 1987 Johnson, Seth McClellan, Sarah Prushing, Nanette Radio Shack Security Plus ~radesman Tools Service T&T Information ank One Brown, Jerry Close, Michael C&SOE Columbus Prosecutor's Off. Diaster Services Agency Geotechnical Consultants Health One Maurer, Barbara Ohio Bell Page Net Scott, Ken Smi th & Hill Zee Medical 50.00 22.05 66.30 179.25 10,466.00 30.45 21.12 875.00 337.50 32.10 2,417.06 160.00 216.06 262.50 496.44 416.40 1,216.51 118.65 2,851.44 5,172.50 78.15 63,316.21 Page 2 Refund for ballroom dancing Mileage Reimbursement Dinner for panel members Risk Mgmt. Seminar Gold 90 Premium - Vehicle Fleet Insurance 4/26/87 to 4/26/88 Bearings & Brush Set for Maintenance April Billing Paying Agent Fees Wash & Wax Cruisers for April Reimburse expenses Electric svc at municipal bldg, pump stations, parks Prosecute Dublin cases 1st qtr. warning system maintenance Weybridge W - Phase I, M.V. - Phase 31 Hospitalization Insurance for May Hotel reservations & Per Diem Allowance May Billing Pagers for Maintenance Employees Electrical Inspections Legal Services for April Replenish First Aid Kit