HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/02/1987
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting
~~ICS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
The Dublin Village Council met at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, February 2, 1987.
Mr. Thornton led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Close welcomed Mr. Thornton back after Mr. Thornton's recent illness.
Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mayor Close, Mr. Jankowski,
Ms. Maurer, Mr. Rozanski, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Thornton.
Mr. Smith, Law Director, was present as were Mr. Bowman, Ms. Clarke, Mr.
Harding, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Jordan, Mr. Olausen, Mr. Price, and Mr. Zombek.
Mr. Sheldon was absent.
Mr. Amorose moved to approve the minutes of the January 19, 1987 meeting
of Council.
Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion.
The vote was 6-0 in favor, with Mr. Thornton abstaining.
Mr. Amorose moved to approve payment of the bills.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
The vote was unanimous in favor.
Mayor Close announced that Council would convene to Executive Session for
the purpose of discussing a personnel and legal problem.
Mayor Close reconvened the regular meeting of Council at 8:02 P.M.
Mayor Close had the following comments:
1. Two weeks ago there was extensive discussion in the Council Chambers
regarding the water tower on Summitview Road near the intersection
of Sawmill Road.
2. At the conclusion of that meeting, an investigation was begun that
has lasted approximately two weeks with Mayor Close, Mr. Amorose,
Mr. Smith, and Mr. Sheldon spending a considerable amount of time.
3. The investigation as conducted indicated that the application had
been made by Columbus for a permit to build a water tower in an area
that, in a legal opinion issued by the Law Director, was in fact
an appropriately zoned area.
4. City services can go into an R-1 zoning area.
5. The problem in this particular case was that administratively the
Village of Dublin was not sensitive to the delicacy of the location
and did fail to give adequate notice to both the Village Council and
the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the status of the
application for a building permit.
6. Notwithstanding the concern of Council regarding the way in which
the matter was handled, Council has been legally advised that at
this point, given the original appropriateness of the zoning in
particular, subsequently the contracts being let by the City of
Columbus pursuant to that application, that at this time a stop
work order could not legally be put on that project by the Village.
7. At this time Council is reviewing the procedures that were in place
that allowed this situation to occur.
8. The biggest part of the problem was an insensitivity to what was
occurring, not necessarily illegalities or misconduct as relating to
procedure.
Mayor Close breifly explained the Rules of Council as they pertain to
Public Hearings.
Ordinance No. 76-86 - Rezone 103.5 Acares, North of Post Road Between
Coffman Road and Avery Road.
Registered proponents were: Mr. Timothy Kelley, and Mr. Christopher Cline.
Registered opponents were: Dr. James Stoycheff, Mrs. Diane Nicholls, and
Mr. Ralph Halloran.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
At inutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~J5!rbs
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Two
Mr. Bowman gave some background information as well as showing some slides
of the site:
1. The subject site is a 95.5 acre site.
2. It is located on the north side of the South Fork of Indian Run Stream
3. It is north of Post Road, approximately midway between Coffman and
Avery Roads.
4. It is immediately east of the Indian Run Meadow PUD and immediately
west of the Hemingway West Subdivision.
Mr. Amorose referred to page five of the minutes of the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting of January 6, 1987, and the text of the ordinance;
regarding whether Tara Hill Drive or Old Sells Mill Drive would be
completed first.
Mr. Bowman said that they had discussed with the applicant that Sells
Mill Drive, in that it goes by the school as well as being able to collect
the traffic that will be developing to the north, should be completed first
Mr. Kelley said that Sells Mill Drive will be the first to be built.
Mr. Bowman had additional information as follows:
5. The applicant is proposing 238 single family lots; the gross density
of the site will be 2.3 dwelling units per acre.
6. The lots, at least in the southern portion of the tract, are a little
bit smaller (more in line with the Indian Run Meadow type development)
while the lots on the north side will be larger and consistent with
those in the Hearlington and Hemingway West subdivisions.
7. The applicant has added the prohibition, similar to that of Indian
Run Meadow, with no fences and no build zones in the smaller lots.
8. The total park land dedication is over 16 acres. It meets the
existing requirement, as well as the new one that Council has passed.
That has been added to the 12~ acres located in the wooded portion;
tried to preserve as much of the woods as they can and add that on
the existing school site and park site that is being devloped in
Indian Run Meadow.
9. Streets have been set up to protect the wooded areas; all the hedge-
rows and existing vegetation should remain on site.
10. The new ordinance calls for 103.5 acres (not 95.5 acres). Some park
land tradeoffs have been made. Originally there was to be a four
acre park in Hemingway West. That has been moved. In working with
the Parks and Recreation Committee as well as the applicant, the
woods have been identified as being a high preservation priority.
Some tradeoffs were made to move the park land to the wooded sites,
thus increasing the amount of acreage in for rezoning.
11. With regard to engineering review, the Planning and Zoning Commission
has been assured that the position of the Planning Staff will be
that all storm water retention will be in compliance with the storm
water regulations. Those regulations are also being reviewed with
specific regard to past performances in the already approved sub-
divisions of Indian Run Meadows, as well as Hemingway and Hemingway
West.
Mr. Bowman said that Mr. Olausen said that it would take him approxi-
mately two weeks to evaluate the storm water situation and well as
to complete the engineering reviews.
12. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning with the
following conditions:
A. Incorporation of the timetable for the completion of Sells Mill
Drive into the text, as well as Tara Hill Drive development
to the south.
B. Commitment to work with staff on defining a no build zone,
establishing a standard for the lots on the north side of Sells
Mill Drive, and providing adequate park access at the Final
Development stage.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
national
graQO..ICS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Three
C. Adequate handling of storm water and provlslon of other services
to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer, and also that the
storm drainage conform to the Village's storm water ordinance.
D. That all park land that is disturbed, due to any construction,
any activity of the developer or any builder, be fine graded
and seeded with a blend of improved Kentucky Blue Grass (to
include the two lots that are the windows to the park - the
lot to the south park; the lot to the north park).
E. The developer construct a 8' wide bikeway for the entire length
of the south park, similar to the bikeway that will be constructe
in Indian Run Meadow.
Mr. Kelley said that they had spent considerable time working with staff,
specifically with the Parks and Recreation Department. Originally, the
plan had lots through the woods, but over time those same trees were
identified as a valuable resource for the Village so the trees were made
a part of the park, said park to be connected onto the school site to
the west.
He said also that the connector streets will be bringing the traffic from
the east to the west to Muirfield and down to route 33.
Mr. Kelley said that there will be a bike path north of Sells Mill Drive
that will be separate from the road right-of-way and will provide access
for children on bicycles to the school He said that there will also be
a bike path to the park to the south which will connect up to either side
to the planned and existing parks in the south, just north of Post Road.
Because there is common ownership Mr. Kelley said that they were able to
the actual ravine, rather than an artificial property line, which will
provid~ the northern boundary for the project. He also said that they
were able to make some logical connections into Earlington IV that
otherwise could not have been made.
Mr. Amorose mentioned a concern that had been expressed at the Planning
and Zoning Commission about the number of windows that would be available
to the park; expressing a concern that as one would drive through the
neighborhood, one would see any green space. He said that there have
been no improvements on the drawing since the Planning and Zoning Commissio
meeting; no lots have been eliminated; no streets have been realigned to
afford an opportunity to view the green space. He noted that a 70' and
an 80' lot comprise the exposurp to the parks.
Mr. Kelley mentioned that fact that the park to the north, where the
trees are, is attached to the school and that there will be a parking lot
from Sells Mill Drive attached to the school, inviting the public to
use that park, and that it will also provide a view from some of Sells
Mill Drive through the school area into the woods. He noted that a view
to the park at the south will have a view from Post Road.
Mr. Amorose expressed a concern that here again we have parks in the back
yards of homes, with very little, if any, off street parking.
He said that to him that is not green space and it is not a usable park;
that there is no parking, no way to get to the park.
Dr. James Stoycheff, a resident, had the following comments:
1. Expressed a concern regarding the fact that the park land is hidden
behind houses.
2. Dublin is turning out to be not as beautiful as it used to be, with
cluster homes and no"park land visible.
3. A park ~uch as Monterey Park in Waterford Village is much more the
type of park that Dublin needs.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~~ICS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
1I eld
February 2, 1987
19
Page Four
4. The sewer situation and the fact that sewage is running into the
Scioto River. He noted that the Village was informed at the
sewer meeting regarding the West Branch Sewer that financing will
be required from the Village of Dublin some time between January 1,
1987 and January 1, 1988.
Mayor Close asked Dr. Stoycheff to speak to the rezoning.
5. The sewer is to be completed in 1990. If this rezoning is to add
more sewage and is to heighten the problem with the sewer, that that
fact should be considered before approving this rezoning (this up-
zoning) .
6. There is already a traffic problem on Coffman Road, and the 500 cars
that will be added to the area with the rezoning will further
perpetuate the problem. People will not necessarily go out Tara Hill
to Muirfield Drive (Boulevard). They will still be using Coffman
Road.
Proposed solution - Dublin build a road, extend Tara HIll, and extend
the road to the school.
7. Citizens are "fed up" with growth.
8. "A vote for this project is a vote against the schools."
Mrs. Diane Nicholls had the following comments:
1. Citizens for Better Planning are opposed to this project for several
reasons:
A. The water situation in this quadrant of Dublin. Until such time
as the water tower is built and put on line, apply a contingency
to this rezoning that no hookups to waterlins be permitted until
after the water tower is completed, on line, and working.
B. Nothing has happened as regards the bike paths that were supposed
to go down Coffman Road.
C. The traffic problem - not confinced that the east/west connectors
are going to take traffic away from Coffman Road. They will
probably send traffic toward Coffman Road.
Mr. Christopher Cline said that the Post Road Residents Association has
not adopted a specific position as regards this proposed development,
since it only affects three residents (Cline, Halloran, and Kinman).
Mr. Cline said that the developer has been very open and communicative
with the residents; the bike path being developed is fine. The only
serious reservation the three residents have is the drainage situation,
but said that he is confident that it can be resolved.
Mr. Ralph Halloran, a resident of Post Road with property abutting this
development, said that he would like members of Council to remember one
thing - that Council should look at the various properties as a whole
and not zone each one as being an entity unto itself. Mr. Halloran went
on to discuss the drainage situation in the area. The 150 acres right
now is on temporary drainage into the pond through a 42" tile which is
flooding the retention/detention lake. It is now passing through the
lake through a 36" tile going into the South Fork of Indian Run and is
now filling up the stream. Mr. Halloran further said that he would like
to go on record right now, saying that the storm sewer has to go through
the Orr property to connect from Indian Run to Hemingway Village. Mr.
Halloran further reminded Council that the Village has 8,000 acres to
the west, and that Council must consider those 8,000 acres to provide
sufficient retention ponds. He said that it takes approximately a 31
acre lake, 10 feet deep, to collect f~om that 8,000 acres.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village COJncil Meeting
~ICS
AIeetillg
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Five
He said that the EPA and the Village ordinance says that storm water
cannot drain into a stream any faster than it originally drained (the
rate). He wanted to remind Council that the lake "right here" is
draining into a 36" tile, which is "something like" 500 times bigger
than the 4" tile that was originally there.
Mayor Close said that the ordinance will be held over for a third reading
at the first meeting in March (March 2, 1987).
Ordinance No. 11-87 - Accept Proposal for Engineering Services for an
Elevated Water Tank in Avery Park. Public Hearing.
There were no registered proponents or opponents.
Mr. Dan Boothe, Jr. was present to give background information and answer
questions.
Ms. Janet Jordan said that in working with Xr. Boothe they discussed what
could be done with the water tower. She said that they were proposing
a type of park maintenance facility to be placed in the bottom of the
water tower for storage of trucks, tractors, etc. as well as providing
some office space, shop space for indoor work space during the winter,
etc.
It was noted that the site is in the northeast corner of the park.
Ms. Jordan and Mr. Boothe agreed that site #2 would be preferable; that
it comes off of the parking lot and disrupts the site the least. They
also said that with mounding and landscaping they would attempt to
"hide the water tower as much as one possibly can".
Mr. Sutphen said that Mrs. Catherin Headlee had asked that some small,
or medium sized oak trees, be planted in front of the tower.
Mr. Boothe said that he had agreed with the Parks and Recreation Department
to bring to Council their suggestions regarding the tank - that whatever
Council would direct him to do, he would do. He noted that many of the
items that the Parks and Recreation Department were asking for presented
no problem - removing the fencing, mounding of the excess soils from
foundations, such things being easily done within the budget proposed.
He did say that the Parks and Recreation Department had asked him about
putting in a second floor; he noted that the request should be considered
at this time since it would extend the design period.
Mr. Boothe said that it would cost about $50/square foot for the second
floor.
It was noted that there would be about 4500 square feet of usable space
on the bottom level.
Mr. Boothe said that for $40,000 to $60,000 the Village could raise the
condensation ceiling on the inside so~that a second floor could be put
in later. He noted that if offices were put on the second level, rest
rooms would have to be provided and as a result a septic system would
have to be installed.
Ms. Jordan said that they need office space for those who work in the
Parks Maintenance Department.
Mr. Boothe said that adding office space and a rest room on the first floor
would be covered~by the contingency allocation in his budget.
He did say that he would need to know how much of the area should be
heated.
Ms. Jordan said that she did think that the office area would need to be
heated, and that in addition that work space area should be heated enough
so that someone could work in the area (something similar to what is in
the maintenance garage area).
Mr. Boothe said that he would be talking further with Ms. Jordan.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
At inutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~~ICS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Six
Mayor Close said to Mr. Rakestraw that he understood that there had been
some discussions with Muirfield regarding the possibility of their using
this tower as a substitute for their ultimate responsibility.
Mr. Rakestraw said that they had been having meetings; discussing the
possibility of taking the liability that Muirfield has to the tower behind
Deer Run School, and putting that liability in this tower as a portion
of the cost of the tower. He said that they have not really assessed
their portion of the cost, have not seen the study, and would like to
see some more specific information before making a commitment.
Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as
an emergency.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion.
The vote on the ordinance was 7-0 in favor.
Ordinance No. 04-87 - Amend Section 1105.07 of the Codified Ordinances.
Third Reading.
Mr. Amorose moved to table the ordinance.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
The vote was 7-0 in favor of tabling.
Ordinance No. 07-87
Second Reading.
There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the February 16, 1987
meeting of Dublin Village Council.
Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions.
Ordinance No. 09-87 - Amend Chapter 1189 of Zoning Code for Theatre Sign.
Second Reading.
Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor.
The vote on the ordinance was 7-0 in favor.
Ordinance No. 10-87 - Amend Ordinance No. 66-80 - Authority of Inspectors
Regarding Inspections. Second Reading.
Mr. Dave Price said that the purpose of the ordinance was to amend a
previous ordinance to apply to commercial inspections what had previously
applied only to residential inspections.
Mr. Rozanski moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
The vote was 7-0 in favor.
The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor.
Ordinance No. 12-87 - Proposal for Design Services - Municipal Building
Remodeling. Second Reading.
Mr. Amorose moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion.
The vote was 7-0 in favor.
The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
national
9rag{LlCS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
H clel
February 2, 1987
19
Page Seven
Ordinance No. 14-87 - Request for Variance of Section 1185.06 of Zoning
Code. Second Reading.
Mr. Smith said that he had the same request that he had made at the last
Council meeting; that because of the litigation and the Court of Appeals
decision that Council pass the ordinance and pass it as an emergency.
Mr. Jankowski moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Ms. Maurer seconded the motion.
The vote was 7-0 in favor of the motion.
The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor.
Ordinance No. 15-87 - Adopt, in Principle, Proposed 1987 Capital Improve-
ments. First Reading.
Mr. Jankowski introduced the ordinance.
Mayor Close scheduled a public hearing on the ordinance for the February
16, 1987 meeting of Council.
Ms. Maurer requested that all department heads be present at the meeting.
Ordinance No. 16-87 - Amend Ordinance No. 52-81 - Compensation Plan.
First Reading.
Mr. Rozanski introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Harding said that Mr. Sheldon had intended to make the salary incredse
retroactive to January 1, 1987 to be consistent with other employees.
Mayor Close said that he would prefer to discuss the matter with Ms.
Jordan before passing the ordinance and that the ordinance would be held
over for a second reading on February 16, 1987.
Ordinance No. 17-87 - Proposal to put Income Tax Increase on Ballot.
First Reading.
Mr. Jankowski introduced the ordinance.
Mrs. Nicholls asked about the possibility of dividing the issues; making
the West Branch Sewer a separate issue.
Mr. Jankowski commented that the Village cannot undertake debt, long-
term financing, without voter approval.
Dr. Stoycheff said that he had contacted some members of Council regarding
the possibility of levying a ~% increase for the Dublin schools; in other
words, have the people vote for a ~% increase to have a school building
built from tax monies; the money to remain with the Village; the ownership
of the schools to remain with the Village and possibly be leased to the
schools.
Mr. Jankowski said that he felt that the concept was illegal, and he also
said that he had not been approached by anyone from the School Board
requesting that the Village consider such a proposal.
Mr. Jankowski also said that when contacted, Council would be glad to
study the issue and respond.
Mr. Amorose said that he felt that the Village needs to look into some
surcharges on water and sewer (the possibility of same) to fund some
of the improvements on the water and sewerlines.
Mr. Jankowski said that the reason the ordinance was on the agenda was
that in order for the Village to get the issue on the May ballot that
they would have to act this evening or, at the very latest, at the
February 16th meeting. He said that the feeling that he was receiving
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~~b
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
11 eld
February 2, . 1987
19
Page Eight
was that Council was not yet ready to proceed for the May ballot and
that perhaps Council should be considering a special election. In that
case, he said, Council should be examining the possibility of alternate
financing methods.
Ms. Maurer commented that the ordinance tha~ Dr. Stoycheff referred to
as the school/land ordinance specifically says that the land does not
have to be used for schools, that it permits the Village to allow the
land to be used for schools.
Ms. Maurer also said that the EPA is requiring cities, such as Columbus,
to bring their plants into small towns that do not have same, and to
bring them "up to line", as Columbus plans to do by July 1, 1988. She
noted that Columbus has made the commitment to rehabilitate and to add
on to the plant downtown to cover the whole sewage area. Dublin's
responsibility is to provide a distribution system to that plant.
She pointed out that Dublin does not have a surcharge on sewer, but
that there is a surcharge on water.
A resident, Mr. Knorr, asked what percentage of the monies was being
allocated for the West Branch Sewer project.
Mr. Jankowski said that all of the projects were "lumped together" and
the amount of money required to fund all the projects was listed.
The cost of the West Branch SeV.1er was "gestimated" to be approximately
13 million dollars.
Ms. Maurer commented on a position held by Fritz Stocker, an economist,
who strongly advises against attaching a portion of the income tax to
capital improvementsl
Ordinance No. 17-87 will be held over for a second reading and public
hearing on February 16, 1987.
Ordinance No. 18-87 - Accept a Quotation from Engineering Firm Regarding
Sources of Inflow and Infiltration in Sewage System. First Reading.
Mr. Rozanski introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Jim Olausen, acting Village Engineer, was present at the meeting to
introduce Mr. Rex Katterheinrich of Floyd Browne and Associates.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that they had completed the initial inflow and
infiltration text; that smoke testing was basically the process that was
used.
He said that initially there were some feelings by some members of Council
and possibly the Village Engineer (B. Warner) that there were possibly
some storm inlets in parking lots, possibly some large commercial buildings
that had downspouts, etc. tied into the sanitary. He said that they
did choose certain areas that were suspicious, choosing specific sewerlines
to smoke test. The report indicates which lines were tested; they did
not find large sources. They were looking only for sources of inflow.
He also mentioned that this time of year is not particularly good for
smoke testing in the hope of finding sources of infiltration. He
said that they did not find those great sources of inflow. They have
proposed to perform a certain amount of flow monitoring in isolated areas,
and that it will help them to pinpoint the areas of conceru.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that he was confident that they would have much
better results in being able to locate those sources of inflow/infiltration.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that this time of year is not the opportune time
to perform smoke testing when one is looking for infiltration. The
infiltration would be in areas where the sanitary sewer mains possibly
are fracture, joints are faulty. He noted that the drier the ground, the
better the results.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that in order to get good results for infiltration
that the smoke testing should probably not be done before late spring or
early summer.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~
Ateeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Nine
Ms. Maurer referred to the report done by Floyd Browne and Associates and
the six recommendations, referring specifically to the first two -
the first one being requiring all identified residents to remove their
downspout connections, and requiring all residents with identified yard
leaks or faulty or boken cleanouts to repair them. She asked if the
Village needs legislation beyond what is "on the books" to require this.
Her second question was to Council - are we going to need more inspectors
to provide rigorous inspection during construction for all storm drains
and sanitary sewers.
The above questions were not answered directly.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that findings on this particular study pointed out
that certain problems probably came after the initial construction phase,
possibly when the contractors came back in to do final grade work, etc.
causing damage to lid castings on manholes. He said that in areas where
blasting is required, that possibly these are sites of infiltration due
to fractures in the sewer main itself.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that they did not locate sources of infiltration.
He said that their intent in the new effort would be to do the flow
monitoring during the spring rains (March, April).
Mr. Rozanski said that it was interesting to note that about 12~ of the
manholes were discovered to have leaks.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that most manholes, unless they are a sealed-type
manhole, have at least vent holes in the top. If those sanitary manholes
are actually submerged they act as a storm inlet. During a rainfall
event they can allow a large volume of water to enter.
Responding to a question, Mr. Katterheinrich said that visually inspecting
all manholes is not included in this proposal; that is probably getting
more in line with a full sanitary sewer evaluation survey. He said that
he would not suggest against that idea.
Mr. Rozanski said that some items that have been found in the system, he
believes, could only get there through open manholes.
Mr. Rozanski moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that the report will point out that the average
daily flow during the monitoring period at the lift station ranged from
approximately 1~ million to 3 million.
Mr. Olausen said that the vast majority of the material coming through
the sanitary system is storm water. He also said that he wanted to point
out that the problem is not solved at this point and that this will take
a long time to reduce the infiltration inflow by a significant level.
The next step should guarantee that the Village has identified which
areas are bringing the chief inflow into the system, but that
the Village may not be able to identify enough inflow with the next
contract in order to significantly solve the problem on a short term basis.
Mr. Katterheinrich, responding to a question from a resident, said that
the existing system, the three pumps that are currently in operation,
pump in the neighborhood of 3.7 million gallons per day. The excess
of the inflow/infiltration flows up to 5 million gallons, gives one an
idea of the volume of water that is bypassing or overflowing into the
river. At the lift station the average daily flow was considerably less
than the capacity of the lift station. However, a rainfall event
drastically increases the flow coming into the lift station; thus causing
the overflow event.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~
Ateetillg
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
II eld
FebruarYu2~ 1987
19
Page Ten
Mrs. Nicholls mentioned a terrible odor in
wondered if this odor could be caused by a
station.
Members of
Company on
the air, at times, and
malfunction at the lift
!
Council said that that odor emanates from the Inland Products
Frank Road.
The vote on doing away with the three time reading rule and treating as
an emergency was unanimous in favor.
The vote on the underlying ordinance wa~ unanimous in favor.
Ordinance No. 19-87 - Accept a Quotation from Engineering Firm to Design
Pumping Capacity Changes, etc. for Main Dublin Pump Station. First
Reading.
Mr. Sutphen introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Olausen said that basically the capacity of the existing pump station
is not adequate to carry the effluent across the river. The sewers on
both sides of the river have a large enough capacity but the pump station
does not. There are two ways that it might be addressed - one is to
remove the inflow that comes into the system so that the pump stction can
handle the effluent. The problem is that that is a very slow process.
It is incremental, so one is looking at a long term solution in that
manner. In the meantime, during any rains, this pump station will over-
flow unless the pump station capacity is increased so this ordinance
would provide the engineering co design a pump station that would handle
the capacity that is currently flowing and has a margin for growth in
capacity to handle the effluent and overflow during the near term (3 to 5
years).
Mr. Sutphen asked if any of the existing facilities can be used or
incorporated, etc.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that it appears that the existing facilities can,
not that they must be used, but there is probably an alternative available
that those existing facilities can be used and incorporated into the
pumping scheme with the new proposed pumps.
He referred to a graph in the report and noted that the graph showed
anticipated flows of approximately 10 million gallons per day at the lift
station in 1990. He said that they would plan to design a facility that
would pump that volume. Any effort that the Village takes towards
removing inflow and infiltration would aid the lift station and reduce the
load on the station itself.
The existing facility would stay intact and be used on a daily basis.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that plans would be completed early this spring
such that construction would take place this summer.
The lines across the river are force mains or pressure lines; their plan
at this point in time is to utilize those existing force mains. They
would also utilize the existing wet well. Their concept would be to
use a pump that could be set on the existing wet well and would not
really disturb the area down there too much at all. By using this type
of design the pumps set above the wet well or above the ground will have
to be protected from freezing (perhaps a small shelter). Currently the
pumps are operating at approximately 1000 gallons per minute at 48' of head
the additional flow would get them up to approximately 7000 gallons a
minute against a head of 80'. The pumps would be sizably larger than
what is there.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~ICS
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Eleven
Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat
as an emergency.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
Mr. Katterheinrich said that their design effort is not only to take care
of the sanitary waste problem but in fact to also take care of an inflow
infiltration problem to eliminate those overflows.
Mayor Close said that the Village needs it for the increase in sewage even
if the Village cleans up the ilfiltration problem. He said that they are
saying that the Village has 3~ million gallon pumping capacity at the
present time, but without infiltration the Village is already "hitting"
3 million gallons on certain days as far as the sewage going through.
The Village needs the additional capacity even if the Village corrects
the infiltration problem.
Mr. Olausen said that there are different amounts of effluent that go
through the lines at different times; there are peaks, and there is a
peak at about 3 million. He said that there will always be a certain
amount of inflow/infiltration; that it cannot be eliminated completely.
The vote was 7-0 on the motion to do away with the three time reading
rule and treat as an emergency.
The vote was unanimous in favor of the ordinance.
Resolution No. 04-87 - Award of Depository for Village Accounts. First
Reading.
Ms. Maurer introduced the resolution.
Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as
an emergency.
mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion.
The vote on the ordinance was 7-0 in favor.
Other
Discussion of Three Way Stop at Coffman and Post Roads.
Mr. Bowman said that in November and December a traffic engineer was hired
to take counts and suggest some improvements to the intersection of
Post and Coffman Roads. The counts that were taken met the warrant for
a three way stop sign. It has to maintain at least 500 cars per hour
every hour for an eight hour period. In looking at the situation, the
consultant did suggest that possibly over the next two years that Dublin
should keep on top of the situation because in some instances it almost
met the signal warrant.
The three way stop is being suggested as a temporary measure; the Village
will continue to monitor it, and when a signal is warranted staff will
suggest a signal at that time.
Mayor Close suggested (particularly at peak traffic hours) making Coffman
Road a continuous street and making Post Road a stop as one is heading
west, eastbound, and a stop, except when making a right turn when heading
westbound. Most of the traffic in that intersection is turning traffic.
Mr. Bowman suggested perhaps having a policeman at the intersection at the
peak hours.
He also said that the change will be advertised in the paper and that since
the corner is so dark that there will possibly be some type of flasing
or at least warning sign that will warn of any changes.
Mr. Johnson said that the warning signs are already made up and "ready
to go".
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
D"blin Village COYIlcilMf.l8ting
~ICS
AJeeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Twelve
Request for Approval of Amended Plat - Tuller Road.
Mr. Bowman said that at the last meeting of the Planning and Zoning
Commission, the Commission with very little discussion recommended
approval of the plat.
Mr. Amorose moved for approval.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
The vote was unanimous in favor of approval.
Discussion Regarding Proposed Earlington School/Park Site Lease.
Mr. Steve Smith said that he has not heard from members of Council, and
therefore assumed that Council was in agreement with the proposed lease.
Ms. Maurer said "no". She said that she had talked with two School
Board members and said that they had some suggestions for modifying two
clauses in the agreement - one being that in terms of closing a school
that a radius in which, if htere is a school to be closed, that it be
Earlington. The other one was a notice provision wherein the school
can give the Village notice after they turn the empty school over to
the Village, of three years, that they need to have the school back for
the next "crop of baby boom children".
Mr. Smith said that he will discuss the above with Mr. Rich.
Mayor Close, responding to a question/comment from Mr. Geese, said that
Council had agreed in principle many months ago that Council would
look to at least cooperate with the schools as far as locating a site
within the Earlington land.
Mr. Geese asked Council why the site has not been turned over to the
Village.
Mr. Bowman said that staff has been talking to the developers; they are
proceeding with the school's architect on the site as well as the park
development. He said that he did not perceive any problems.
Presentation by Dr. John Peterson Regarding 1992 Ameriflor Exhibition.
Dr. Peterson had a audio/slide presentation regarding same.
After the presentation Dr. Peterson had the following comments:
1. Looking at using approximately 250 acres of park land.
2. The outdoor exposition will run for about five or six months.
3. It will be the first event of its kind in the United States to get
the Class A. ranking; it will be the first Class A exhibition ever
in the Western Hemisphere.
Comments from Staff
Mr. Bowman mentioned that the invitations had been sent regarding the
Master Plan Workshop to be held on February 21, 1987 beginning at 8:30 A.M.
at the Dublin Middle School (1919 building). He said that notices and
response cards would be published in the newspapers, and encouraged those
who plan to attend to call the municipal building and indicate same.
Mr. Bowman encouraged all interested citizens to attend.
Comments from Citizens
Mrs. Diane Nicholls referred to a three page document which had been
submitted to members of Council this evening by the Citizens for Better
Planning. She said that these are issues that they are going to put
on as initiative measures on either the November ballot or that they
would like to request that Council require a special election to coincide
with the May primary so that that could go on the May primary ballot.
Mayor Close said that he felt that there was a conflict with the issues
and the ordinances and resolutions in the Dublin Village Charter.
I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~b
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February.. 2, 1987
19
Page Thirteen
Mayor Close also said that from a quick perusal of the document that they
are asking for some of the things to happen that are directly in violation
of the Village Charter.
He also said that the West Branch Sewer project would have to be put on
the ballot anyway, so that that would not be an issue.
Mrs. Nicholls said that she would like for Council members to consider
the issues, and that at the next Council meeting they would like some
answer from Council as to whether they would be willing to call a special
election - by law they cannot go on a primary ballot - they have to go
on a general election or a special election ballot.
Mrs. Nicholls said that they would be filing them with the Clerk and will
be circulating petitions at which time they will expect to get the 10%
of the voters who voted in the last gubenatorial election as signees.
It was noted that if there is a special election, the Village must pay
for it.
Mrs. Susan McCabe, a resident of Dublin for 18 years, representing resident
who feel that zoning has been overlooked, specifically with regard to the
waterline had some comments. She said that she felt that Council was
being insensitive to the concerns of taxpayers, and expressed a concern
that if the water tower were to be constructed on Summitview Road that
the construction of apartments would be encouraged rather than the
construction of single family homes.
Mayor Close said that the Village would not request an injunction because
the legal opinion has is that the Village cannot win if the Village asks
for the injunction.
Ms. McCabe requested that Mr. Stephen Smith recite a portion of Code
1137, dealing with the height requirement. She expressed a concern
regarding a situation in which it seems that the Village is "bowing"
to the requirements of the City of Columbus and are not being sensitive
to the needs and concerns of the residents of Dublin.
Mayor Close said that the Dublin Village Council sets agenda and policy
and then hires administrators to be involved in the day to day activities.
Occasionally, he said, there is a breakdown - in this case there was a
breakdown in which Council had no knowledge of the situation until it
was over.
Mayor Close said that he felt that members of Council cared about the
problem and were sensitive to the needs and concerns of the citizens.
He noted that there comes a point at which one has gathered all the
information that one can, that information is shared, one asks for the
best legal advice that one can based on that information you have gathered.
At that point one can do one of two things -one can be as honest as one
can with the people one is dealing with and say that administratively
there was a breakdown. Legally there is nothing the Village can do about
it at this point.
Ms. McCabe asked why the issue was not put before the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Mayor Close said that any public utility is properly placed in R-1 zoning.
It does not have to go to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Smith said that it was his professional opinion that at the present
time Dublin would be unsuccessful in attempting to seek injunctive relief
in a court to stop the tower, for a number of reasons. The controlling
factor is not just the height of the tower or the fact that it did not
go through Planning and Zoning nor the manner in which the permit was
issued, signed, or handed to somebody. The controlling law centers
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
M illules of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~ICS
Meet illg
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
II ele!
February 2, 1987
19
Page Fourteen
around the fact that it is a public utility, the Village has a contract
with that public to provide utility services for the Village residents.
He also said that there is what is called an estoppel doctrine, that
the Village would be estopped from attempting to enjoin the action of an
agent when the action of the Village's agent was not improper. Mr. Smith
said that he had discussed the situation with private counsel, and that
private counsel did not disagree with Mr. Smith as to Dublin's position.
The fact that the height requirement was not approved by the Planning
and Zoning Commission, Mr. Smith said, does not invalidate the project.
He said that in his professional opinion it will not permit the Village
to seek an injunction.
Responding to a question from Ms. McCabe, Mayor Close said that the water
tower, when complete, will serve the east side of the river in Dublin,
and it will serve the west side of the river in Dublin when it hooks into
the Summitview waterline that goes underneath the road. He noted that
it will probably provide some pressure relief for the Sawmill Road area.
Ms. McCabe said that she felt that there was a more appropriate site
than the one that was chosen; perhaps the commercial area to the south
would be better than the residential area in which it is being placed.
Mayor Close said that he felt that Columbus's position was that it would
sit in the middle of a farm area, not residential, next to a high tension
wire.
A resident of 3838 Summitview since 1972 asked at what point the Village
of Dublin was estopped.
Mr. Smith said, "I suppose when the contract was bid with the City of
Columbus or when Bruce first approved it".
Mrs. Boring had a question regarding the building permit.
Mr. Amorose said that he had a copy of the building permit; he had called
Bruce Warner the previous evening; Mr. Warner said that he had not issued
a building permit; however, the building permit has his signature on it.
It was noted that the building permit was undated, even though the
procedure is that permits are to be dated.
Mayor Close said that he had no explanation as to why this permit was not
dated.
II
II
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
,
The question regarding estoppel was asked again.
Mayor Close said that the point that Columbus financially acted upon that
permit and relied upon it as to its validity.
Mr. Smith said, "when Columbus relied upon it".
Mr. Amorose said that he felt that there were some unanswered questions and
that he would like to see a more thorough examination of "tracing this
piece of paper from the time of whoever filled it out originally; walk
it right through all its steps and see exactly what happened".
Mayor Close said that Mr. Warner signed the permit; the permit was issued;
contracts were let in reliance on that; and the law that applies to that
is relatively clear.
Mr. Amorose said that he had talked with Bruce - "I asked Bruce if he had
issued a building permit for the water tower. He said he did not issue
that building permit. And I said, Bruce, I have a copy of the building
permit here with your signature on it, and he said, well, I don't remember
signing it, but I could have signed it".
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of
Dublin Village Council Meeting
~b
Meeting
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
February 2, 1987
19
Page Fifteen
Mr. Willard Chambers, a resident, commented on the fact that the resulting
insensitivity was not a singular happening; that there have been any
number of cases in which Columbus has acted arbitrarily. He commented
that he felt the residents were entitled, that every effort be made to
secure an injunction, a good faith effort properly done.
Mr. Chambers also said that he felt that the residents were entitled to
be told what has been done or what is going to be done to prevent a
repetition of this type of situation. He indicated that it should be a
matter of procedures established by the highest officials. He noted that
in any government organization with which he has been acquainted that
the very first rule is that when you get a request from any jurisdiction
other than your own it has to go to the top level of the city to be
acted upon.
Mayor Close said that measures would be taken in order that a similar
situation would not occur again.
Mr. Haydocy of Glencree asked if there would be any possibility that the
tower could be moved.
Mayor Close said that he would talk to Mayor Rinehart of the City of
Columbus the following morning.
Mr. Smith, in response to a question, said that in his oplnlon the worst
case scenario would be if the Village of Dublin won an injunction, and
the City of Columbus terminated the water contract, and as a result the
Village of Dublin would be required to build their own water system.
Mayor Close adjourned the meeting to executive session at 11:41 P.M.
Mayor - Presiding Officer
/7
AhvGWLt7J' li-~~
Clerk of Council
.
Bill Listing
February 2, 1987
ADS Systems
Attorney General Office
Basic Distribution
Matthew Bender
RSN Corp.
'ntury Equipment
,lumbus City Auditor
...dvis Guns
Delaware Co. Materials
Jan Rozanski
Domtar Industries
,.,ary Fr ies
Geotechnical Consultants
Goodale Auto Parts
Goodyear
Headlee Office Supplies
Hocking Technical College
Horne, King, Rauh
JD Equipment
Johnnies Union 76
Key Blue Prints
Kroger
Metro Sports
Martina Metal Contracting
Linworth Lumber Co.
C.O. Lowe
Lyons Body Shop
E.W. Mays
Mayors Association of Ohio
Nat'l Recreation of Parks
io City mgmt Assoc.
.vil Engineering Assoc.
ganizational Resources
Paul Peterson Co.
Dan Rachlis
Radio Shcak
Brigid Rembert
Marianne Rennie
Roush Hardware
Rota Rooter
Service Supply
Shoes & Gloves
Suther lands
Trask Aerial Photography
Tuller Printing & Graphics
\iJashington Twp
149.3l
60.00
18.24
37.50
54.89
791.40
1647.00
8.40
238.39
166.80
9301.32
20.00
220.00
604.91
65.57
275.44
375.00
2167.00
63.56
220.50
142.23
9.67
38.00
1470.00
888.00
99.00
322.00
86.60
10.00
13.50
50.00
1912.50
2066.25
1526.00
60.00
75.87
66.00
25.00
256.73
185.00
944.50
77.75
288.82
160.00
765.68
6352.50
Calculator for Finance dept.
Tuition for Police to courses
Bulbs for Municipal Bldg
police Civil Liability Book
First Aid Kit for P & R
Engine for case roller
Cost to operate Municipal Cts. for 1986
Mag lite switch covers for cruisers
Fiber Mix
Reimbursement for Ball State students dinners
Salt for streets
Refund for P&R program
Pavement cores on Avery Rd.
Repair axles on TK #15
Tire & tube
Office supplies, file frames, envelopes
Seminar-Int'l Homicide Seminar
design sketches for dept. revisions
cap for vehicle maint.
Repair on S-lO pickup
Mylar prints
Paper plates for senior citizen luncheon
Long sleeve shirts for volleyball
Labor & material to finish caps for ice rink
Laminated foam
Grass seed
Repair TK #11
Chisel & File set
Membership dues
Park Maint. stds book
Membership dues
Temp. Engineer services
Services rendered for Goals & Objectives
Signs for new development
Consulting fees
Tape recorder for maint.
Instructor for Kaleidoscope
Donation for performance at X-mas party
Misc. supplies
Clean out jet line
Crosses for street name signs
Brown coveralls
Lumber, plywood, etc...
Aerial slides
Court dockets & log books
Fire hydrant maint.
BILL LISTING-Page 2
Con,t February 2, 1987
Worthington Towing
SMi th & HIll
AT & T
Athletic Club at Metro
Jess Howard Electric
T"'r ry Brown
ltral Ohio Welding
lumbia Gas
~vlumbus & So. Ohio Elec.
COMSCI
Health One
Lamberts
McGraw hill
Ohio Bell
Southeastern Equip.
Dan Tobin Chevrolet
Payroll
175.00
4925.00
21.l2
190.00
350.90
367.50
9.00
272.69
5288.39
4.65
496.44
194.40
158.l0
1126.71
70.84
45.00
51137.74
TOTAL
99,210.31
Tow tk #15 & #10
Legal services-Jan
Leased phone equip.
Membership dues
Electric services to repair tennis ct. lights
Wash & Wax cruisers
Oxygen rental
Gas service at 129 S. High
Electric service
Film processing
Insurance Premium-Feb
Coffee & Supplies
Engineering News Report
Phone service
Bushings, knobs, Cable
Renewal of Tags
Payroll for 1-15-87