Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/1992 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council was called to order by Mayor Tan Rozanski at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, October 5, 1992 and Mr. Smith led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present for roll call were: Mr. Kranstuber, Mrs. King, Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Amorose, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Campbell. Mr. Strip arrived at 7:50 p. m. (excused). Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also present. Approval of Minutes of September 28 and October 5, 1992 Meetings Mr. Amorose moved to approve the minutes of the September 28 Council meeting. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Mayor Rozanski proposed that approval of the minutes of October 5, 1992 meeting be tabled until the next meeting of Council, as they were distributed to Council this evening. Council members concurred. Correspondence The Clerk reported that there was no correspondence to Council. Proclamations The Mayor read a proclamation declaring the month of October to be "Ohio Recycle Month" in the City of Dublin. He presented it to Council Member King, a board member of the Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio. The week of October 24 through November 1 was proclaimed "Red Ribbon Week" in the City of Dublin. This program makes a visible statement that the City is strongly committed to staying drug free. He presented the proclamation to Chief Ferrell, who accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Dublin D.A.R.E. program. Comments from Visitors State Senator Eugene Watts, representing the 16th district which includes the City of Dublin, addressed Council. He commented that he is proud to now represent the City of Dublin as a result of the redistricting, and invited citizens to call him if they have concerns or issues to be addressed at the Statehouse. Mayor Rozanski welcomed Senator Watts to Dublin and wished him luck in the November 3 election. Mayor Rozanski acknowledged the presence of Representative Bill Schu~k, Dublin's representative in the Ohio House. Sally R~mond, Dublin Arts Council., announced that the Dublin Arts Council and the City Council were recently recognized by the Columbus Landmarks Foundation for the art in public places program, specifically for "Leatherlips". This is the first time that the Foundation has honored an organization outside of Columbus. She thanked Council for their support of the arts program through the hotel/motel tax funds. She added that the Arts Council is very willing to assist the City with the incorporation of art in the new Community Center. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting D N L AL October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mayor Rozanski announced that Mr. Greyard of the Llewellyn Farms Civic Association had requested that the Llewellyn residents issue be moved to the front of the agenda and he has agreed to do so. Other Llewellyn Farms Residents Following the last Council meeting, the Land Use Committee of Council met to present information the City of Dublin currently has regarding the proposed Tuttle Crossing Mall to interests residents. He asked Mr. Kranstuber to report on the meeting. Mr. Kranstuber stated: The Land Use Committee met on Thursday, October 15 pursuant to a request by Council to solicit testimony concerning the proposal for a mall at Tuttle Crossing. Present at the meeting were Committee members Joel Campbell and Chuck Kranstuber and concerned citizens from nearby residential neighborhoods. City staff members attending were Tim Hansley, City Manager; Terry Foegler, Director of Development; Mitch Banchefsky, Assistant Law Director; Balbir Kindra, City Engineer; Bobbie Clarke, Acting Planning Director; and Chief Ron Ferrell, Police Department. Residents expressed their concerns regarding possible traffic congestion and increased crime resulting from the proposed mall development. Mr. Kindra testified that traffic would not be significantly worse with the development of a mall rather than a strip shopping center. Chief Ferrell responded that, based upon his research, crime in surrounding residential neighborhoods would not significantly increase with a mall versus a strip center. Mr. Banchefsky noted that any action by Council, such as the proposed resolution submitted by Llewellyn residents, precluding a future rezoning in Dublin without proper due process would be considered an unconstitutional taking, thereby subjecting the City to liability. Based upon the testimony, it is the recommendation of this Committee that the following letter be sent to Columbus City Council, Columbus Development Commission, and Mayor Greg Lashutka: [Mr. Kranstuber then read into the record the letter which is attached to the minutes.] James Gre and 5716 Chatterfield Drive Dublin thanked Mayor Rozanski for accommodating the Llewellyn residents present tonight by moving this item up on the agenda. He asked that anyone present in favor of the mall be allowed to address Council prior to those opposed to the mall. Mayor Rozanski stated that since the Llewellyn residents had requested placement on the agenda this evening, they should make their presentation at this time. Mr. Greyard stated that a number of residents will be making comments to Council this evening, and introduced Tom Quigley. Tom Ouigley 4699 Belfield Drive, Dublin, stated that as a follow-up to the Council comments at the October 5 meeting, the Association invited Council members to a civic association meeting over the weekend, and Mrs. King attended the meeting. He believes this is an important first step in the communication process. The Llewellyn residents are basically asking Dublin Council to take a "proactive" stance regarding the mall instead of a "reactive" stance. He believes the City of Columbus' "good neighbor" policy should be revisited, as Columbus is pursuing development without thought of the impacts on neighboring areas. Also remarked that Columbus is fiscally irresponsible, seeking to expand in order to increase the tax base without thought to the costs of providing service for such RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 Meetin NK FORM N 10148 October 19, 1992 Held 19 a development. Area residents are developing a coalition in their effort to oppose the mall development. He reiterated that Dublin should take a proactive stance in dealing with any proposed mall development at Tuttle Crossing. Kelly Godshall, 4608 Tuttle Road,, Dublin, stated that zoning for the Tuttle area was established in December of 1988 and should be maintained. She asked that the Dublin City Council support the residents in maintaining the current zoning. Also added that this is not just a Dublin issue, but a northwest quadrant issue. She believes the quadrant already has adequate shopping centers serving the residents. She is concerned with the increased crime a mall will bring to the area. Asked that Dublin Council relay these concerns to the Columbus City Council. Tom Heskamp, 4776 Belfield, Dublin, stated that the proposed mall rezoning will affect the entire area for years to come. He believes that the answers to questions posed by residents have not been credible. Cited the Columbus budget deficit next year of $25 million and asked how Columbus can provide adequate fire and police protection in light of the deficit. Another cost issue for Columbus is the necessary widening of Frantz Road to accommodate the mall development. The City of Dublin will have to foot the bill for increased services needed in Dublin as a result of the mall development. David Zelle, 4709 Belfield. Dublin, stated that he has concerns about the safety of the children of the area if the proposed mall development is approved. Believes Dublin must be proactive in protecting their children. Three safety issues come to mind: (1) safety of children crossing Tuttle Road to the playground; (2) speeding cars on Tuttle Road; and (3) the danger of child abductions from a mall adjoining a freeway system. Planning in place for the area for the past few years should not be compromised at this time. Larry Lehner, 4136 Hertford Lane Dublin, commented that there is a long history with the City of Columbus in this area of Dublin. Donations were made by developers to the campaign against the 1990 proposed .merger of Washington Township and the City of Dublin. Certain commitments were made by the City of Columbus to forestall the merger, such as paying for the costs of water towers needed for the area. The proposed mega-mall also will benefit from the water tower Dublin has recently decided to proceed with at Rings and Blazer: Why shouldn't Columbus pay part of the cost when it will reap the tax benefits of the mall serviced by the tower? The West Branch interceptor was to have been installed by Columbus in 1978; they have not carried through on that commitment. I Mr. Greyard stated that there are 10 major shopping centers in the City of Columbus now; there are only 8 in Cincinnati and there are 30 in Cleveland. How many more stores do we need? He stated that the Edwards Company and subsidiaries developed the Llewellyn area but never finished the job -once he sold the lots, he walked away with hundreds of thousands of dollars and left it for others to finish. He commented that it was not the "American dream" of Llewellyn residents to live 1/2 mile from a major shopping center. The City of Dublin would not irresponsibly place a 1,000,000 square foot mall 250 feet from the nearest home. He praised Council for their past record regarding rezonings. The people of Dublin do not need Pete Edwards or his company for development of the area. Rich Gomez. 4157 Hertford Lane Dublin Lrestated the theme of all the speakers this evening. The residents are seeking a proactive stance from the City of Dublin. Mr. Edwards made promises to both communities -Columbus and Llewellyn Farms. The residents of Dublin rely on City Council to take a proactive stance toward zoning that is not credible. Residents believe that Mr. Edwards is looking for a bailout for the southeast quadrant of Tuttle Crossing in the form of a rezoning. If he had intended that a mall be located there, he would not have built apartments near the freeway nor a road through the middle of the development. This mall was not planned, as Mr. Edwards has stated. Mr. Gomez added that no one in the room would like to live 250 feet from a 1,000,000 square foot mall. He stated that the Columbus School Board was brought into this rezoning issue for political reasons, and the Board does not understand the implications of zoning. i RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Meeting DAYT N L AL B October 19, 1992 ' Held 19 Tom Quigley spoke again, stating that he has some good news for all. "Columbus no longer has the excuse in citing a lack of retail on the northwest. Next week a public announcement will be made where JMB, the developer of Sawmill and 161, will announce that they have reached an agreement, have forged an agreement with the Army Corps of ~ Engineers and the U.S. Government that solves the wetlands issue. That piece of property can move on as was originally planned. This is good news for Dublin City Schools and it's also part of the win-win agreement -everybody wins." He added that the residents would like to know Council's point of view on the resolution submitted two weeks ago. Mr. Smith stated that he would instruct Council not to pass the first resolution submitted to them at the last meeting, as it would constitute a taking. The second resolution submitted was one in support of the residents concerns and actions. Mr. Smith has been told by Council that following the Land Use Committee meeting, Council would either direct him to prepare a proper resolution for consideration and/or Council would make some other motion if they choose to support the efforts of the residents. Pursuant to this, he drafted a resolution, circulated to the Land Use Committee, which declares Council's support of the activities and concerns of the residents with respect to traffic, infrastructure, fire, police and emergency services. He read the draft resolution into the record [copy attached]. He commented that Council may choose to adopt Mr. Kranstuber's letter or this draft resolution. In response to Mr. Quigley's question about timeframes for adoption of such a resolution, Mr. Smith stated that the Columbus Development Commission has now postponed the hearing on the Tuttle Crossing Mall until late November. The resolution he read was prepared as a draft for Council and is not on tonight's agenda. He added that the letter drafted by the Land Use Committee, in his opinion, will be more effective as it is directed to the individual members of the Columbus City Council, Development Commission, and Mayor Lashutka. Mr. Strip commented that Council could pass a resolution, send a letter or do both. Mr. Campbell stated that if it is feasible and is the consensus of Council, they could do both. He asked if any Council members objected to pursuing the draft resolution Mr. Smith presented and sending the letter as drafted. If Council members would like to modify the letter in any way, the Land Use Committee does not object. Mr. Smith stated that following the October 5 Council meeting, he had spoken to several Llewellyn residents outside of Council Chambers and asked that they contact him if they have suggestions or want legal input on the proposed resolution. He heard from no one until today when John Chester called and wanted to meet. Mr. Smith is still willing to meet with residents if they desire. He added that Mr. Chester stated that he was retained by the residents of Llewellyn to provide legal advice in regard to the mall. Mr. Quigley thanked Mr. Smith for the invitation and accepted his offer. Mrs. King urged that Council bring some resolution to this issue and that Council send the letter, with a few small changes, as drafted. She stated that Council should hear from other residents present before a decision is made. She believes Council should send a positive message that they would like to work with the City of Columbus on the mall issue. Mr. Oui lg_eX commented that this is a broad-based coalition working on the mall issue. He hopes that this letter or resolution reflects the City of Dublin's position, and not just that of the Llewellyn or Waterford residents. Mr. Kranstuber commented that in addition to the unconstitutional taking issue, Mr. Banchefsky had noted that if the City adopts the resolution which refers to the rezoning in Dublin, it could not in any case bind a future Council. Also added that Mr. Zelle had provided persuasive testimony about the dangers near Thomas Griffith Elementary, and the Land Use Committee recommends that this specific issue be referred to Safety Committee. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 Chris Cline. attorney 37 W Bride Street, Dublin, stated that he represents the Rings/Tuttle Residents Association, a group formed to express support of the Tuttle Crossing Mall either in Columbus as presently proposed or north of Tuttle in Dublin if Columbus should reject the rezoning. He has sent a letter to each Council member expressing the residents' position. They believe the mall will enhance the value of their properties and will encourage development of valuable tax base properties in the City of Dublin and Dublin City School District. He urged Council to support the mall development in Columbus south of Tuttle, as he believes there will be valuable spin-off development in the City of Dublin. The potential real estate taxes contributed by this mall, if located in Dublin, would be 10 percent of the present Dublin School District budget. If Columbus turns down the rezoning, he urged Council to aggressively seek to obtain it for Dublin and Dublin City Schools. Joan Daly, 347 Pebble Creek Drive Dublin, lives in the Waterford subdivision, and stated that there are many residents of other subdivisions who are equally and vehemently opposed to the proposed mall. Chuck Postlewaite. Llewellyn resident, commented in response to statements made by Mr. Edwards' representative. Mr. Postlewaite has warned 'Council of the tactics employed by Edwards Land Company to persuade the City of Columbus to grant the rezoning, wherein Edwards is effectively saying to Columbus that "if you don't put the mall in there, Dublin is going to take it. " He assured Council that if the Edwards Company has any thought of moving the mall to the north side of Tuttle in Dublin, they will have even more vehement opposition. He asked Mr. Edwards' representative to stop trying to "fool the people." He again asked Council to make it clear to Columbus via a resolution or letter that the mall will not be put in Dublin if Columbus turns it down. Mr. Kranstuber corrected Mr. Postlewaite, stating that there was no representative of the Edwards Company addressing Council tonight. Chris Cline clarified for the record that he does not represent Pete Edwards, but rather the Rings/Tuttle residents of the City of Dublin. Mayor Rozanski asked for a recommendation from the Land Use Committee. Mr. Kranstuber stated that he has no problem with adopting both a resolution and sending the proposed letter. Mayor Rozanski commented that there are two courses of action: (1) to send the proposed letter on to the City of Columbus; and (2) to vote to put a resolution on the agenda for next Council meeting so that it can be advertised. Mr. Campbell moved to ask Council to accept the Land Use Committee's recommendation to send a letter, subject to any amendments Council members submit to Mr. Foegler within the next couple of days, to Columbus City Council, Development Commission and Administration. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Mr. Strip moved to place the Law Director's draft resolution on the next Council agenda, which would be subject to amendment by Council and the attorney representing the Llewellyn residents. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. Mrs. King commented that it may have to be passed as an emergency in order to adopt it prior to the November 19 meeting of the Columbus Development Commission. RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meeting DAYTON L AL October 19, 1992 Held 19 Vote on the motion -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Legislation Ordinance No. 110-92 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 31.59 Acres ~ of Land, Located on the Northeast Corner of Rings Road and Wilcox Road to be Rezoned from: R-1B, Restricted Suburban Residential District (Washington Township Classification) to: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. (Tabled Ordinance) Mr. Kranstuber moved to remove Ordinance No. 110-92 from the table. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Mayor Rozanski reminded Council that this is the second reading of this Ordinance as it was not referred to Planning & Zoning at the first reading. Mr. Kranstuber believes it appropriate to refer it to Planning & Zoning Commission where they can ensure it is consistent with the Southwest Plan currently in the revision process. He moved to refer it to Planning & Zoning. Mrs. King explained that residents at the recent public meeting regarding the Southwest Area Plan Update were supportive of deferring rezonings until the plan was updated to r ensure that rezonings are in accord with the revised plan. She recently spoke to the Southwest Area Residents Association who stated they are in support of moving this particular rezoning along as it is a request to rezone for single-family homes and not multi- family. She is still concerned about referring rezonings to P&Z prior to the completion of the Southwest Plan update. City services must keep pace with development and right-of- ways must be preserved. Mr. Campbell stated that he believes it is important to allow an applicant the opportunity to pursue a rezoning on his land. P&Z has a split among the members about whether or not there should be a moratorium on future residential rezonings in the southwest area specifically. Current market conditions have driven up the volume of residential rezonings in general. He commented that, in general, residential rezonings recently submitted to the City have been in accordance with the established Community Plan. A number of multi- family rezonings submitted for the southwest area have, however, been rejected in accordance with the area residents' wishes. He believes rezonings in the southwest area should be handled on a case by case basis. However, anyone who applies for rezoning in the southwest area should be notified that their application could be subject to reworking as a result of the Southwest Plan update. He supports the removal of this case from the table and referral to P&Z. Mayor Rozanski believes that this application should be referred to P&Z so that the case can be heard. Council has a tradition of giving all applicants the chance for their case to be heard. Mr. Strip also supports referral to P&Z for this case. He pointed out that the Safety Committee of Council has raised a concern regarding water pressures in the southwest area prior to building of the new water tower. This may be a consideration for future rezonings, especially for multi-family housing. Mrs. King clarified that she favors addressing the rezoning issue tonight, but believes that it is the City's responsibility to establish written standards for developers regarding rezoning applications. She added that the development and planning/zoning staff work very hard and it is important to allow them time to do their jobs. Market conditions favoring increasing residential rezonings still require a lot of time for staff and P&Z to perform adequate review. She commended Mr. Campbell and Mr. Kranstuber's efforts to smooth out RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 relationships with developers over the past few months. If a large number of rezonings are submitted for review, staff cannot possibly finish the update of the Southwest Area Plan. Vote on the motion to refer to P&Z -Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes. Ordinance No. 24-92 (Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of a 46.439 Acre Tract Located on the East Side of Avery Road, Approximately 1,000 Feet to the North of Tara Hill Drive, to be Rezoned from: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District to: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. (Public Hearing) Mayor Rozanski asked proponents and opponents to sign in. Tim Kelley registered as a proponent; Tom Merritt registered as an opponent. Ms. Clarke showed aerial slides of the site, and some ground slides as well. This is a request to rezone the property from R-1 with a minimum lot area of 40,000 square feet to PLR. There will be 105 single-family lots on 43.7 acres. The area to become parkland is situated along Bear Run, and there are buffer strips or lineal park portions along Muirfield Drive. P&Z heard this case on September 10 and recommended approval by a vote of 5 to 1. The conditions are as follows: 1. Revision of the plan with respect to lot lines along the floodway and no build zones along floodways and abutting parks; 2. Submission of the Avery Road and Muirfield Drive landscaping, entry feature, and street tree plans; 3. Examination of all lots in the platting phases to assure adequate depth and buildable areas given limitations caused by floodway, setback, entry features, no build zones, landscaping, and mounding; 4. Identification of existing trees and provision of preservation plan that is subject to staff approval; 5. Submission of appropriate single-family development standards and updated legal description; 6. Providing adequate access to the park; 7. Description of detention ponds, especially along Muirfield Drive, to demonstrate that appropriate appearance and maintenance can be assured; 8. That a perimeter fence along Mr. Robert Harrison's property will be shown on the plat and his drainage the easement will be kept in place (through the park to the Bear Run); and 9. Review of Mr. Kelley's reconfiguration of Lots #17-22 and #49-54 to preserve as many trees as possible. The preliminary plat was reviewed by Planning Commission at the October meeting and several lots were eliminated in order to place larger lots within the treed area. Most provisions have been complied with; the balance will be taken care of during the platting procedure. Mr. Campbell noted that, additionally, there is a no build zone along the backs of the southernmost lots in the woods to maximize the amount of woods preserved. This will have to be incorporated in addition to tree preservation during construction. Tim Kelle 250 E. Broad Street Columbus, stated he represents the applicant for the rezoning, Ohio Holding Company. This application also includes four acres from the rear of the Butterfield parcel off of Avery Road. The property has four fixed boundaries: Bear Run on the north, Muirfield on the east, Avery Road on the west, and the property line which incorporates the rear portion of the Butterfield property on the south. Council will have the opportunity to review both the preliminary plat and the final plat as part of the PLR zoning process. He noted that the density of 2.34 per acre conforms to the Community Plan in this area which calls for 2 to 4 units per acre. The density compares well with surrounding areas. The developer has tried to eliminate cut-throughs between Muirfield and Avery through the design of the road network. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8 Meeting A N AL October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mr. Sutphen asked if the developer plans to install the bikepaths up front. Mr. Kelley stated that they are agreeable to installing bikepaths at the beginning of construction of the development. Mr. Sutphen also expressed concern about the turning radius on the cul-de-sacs and whether or not it is adequate for the fire department. Mr. Kelley stated that the developer will comply with the City's requirements for cul-de- sacs. Regarding sidewalks, he asked if the developer will install sidewalks along Avery Road or a bikepath in lieu of sidewalk. Mr. Kelley responded that they are willing to do so. Mrs. King asked if the applicant believes there is a need for a median cut on Muirfield Drive and, if so, would he be willing to install a turn lane. Mr. Kelley responded that they are willing to work this out to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. He further agreed that they would pay the cost if the turn lane is determined to be necessary by the City Engineer. Tom Memtt. 7300 Pueblo Court Indian Run Meadows stated that he is not opposed to the rezoning, but simply has some concerns. Mr. Memtt stated that his concerns are with the preservation of the stand of trees in the southern end of the proposed development, north of Pueblo Court. He questioned the effectiveness of tree protection plans which were followed when Indian Run was built, resulting in many damaged and dying trees. He proposed that Council reduce the number of lots in the tree area, possibly designating this area instead for parkland. If this option is not viable, perhaps a deed restriction could be imposed or a tree replacement commitment could be made by the developer. He asked if the no-build zone precludes the owner from removing trees. Mr. Smith responded that it does not. Mr. Campbell stated that the same concerns regarding tree preservation were stated at P&Z. This is why the developer is running utilities in front instead of in the woods. There are legal limits to what the City can require as far as preservation of the trees. Mr. Merritt asked Council to consider that the proposed development abuts existing lots in Indian Run Meadows which makes it more unique. Mr. Kelley stated that the lots on Pueblo Court south of Dublinshire 5 are 65 feet in width, while the lots in Dublinshire wooded area will be 85 feet which offsets the difference in the depth of lots compared to Indian Run Meadows. Mr. Kelley confirmed that the landscape plan, which will be submitted with the preliminary plat, will be based on a continuance of what is already in place. Discussion followed about the issue of deed restrictions to preserve trees. Mrs. King requested that staff provide better ground slides for Council's use in evaluating rezonings and preliminary plats. Mr. Amorose added that the Landmark Tree Program will be brought to Council soon from the Parks & Recreation Committee. This will be an identification program for trees larger than 24 inches in diameter, and greater than 4.5 feet in height. Aerial photography will be utilized in this program. He requested that slides provided by staff should be formatted consistently with north at the top and to scale for easier orientation during presentations. Mr. Strip expressed concern that the conditions discussed this evening be a part of the record when Council takes action on this rezoning. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mr. Kelley stated that the bikepath issue will be taken care of by P&Z on the preliminary plat. Mr. Strip stated that his concern was with the installation of the bikepath up front, as proposed by Mr. Sutphen. Mr. Campbell proposed that this be added as a condition of rezoning. The turn lane should be added as a condition, if recommended by the City Engineer. Another issue is a deed restriction in an attempt to preserve trees. This can all be done with the motion to approve the rezoning at the third reading. Mayor Rozanski asked the Clerk to give a list to Bobbie Clarke and pass along the concerns regarding the possible need for a turn lane to the City Engineer. There will be a third reading of the Ordinance at the November 2, 1992 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 102-92 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of Lot 246 of Hemingway Village Section 3, Located on the South' Side of Taia Hill Drive, 50 Feet West of Literary Lane, to be Rezoned from: R-2, Limited Suburban Residential District to: R-3, Suburban Residential District. (Public Hearing) There were no proponents or opponents present. Ms. Clarke showed slides of the subject site and surrounding area. The site was originally platted as a 1/2 acre lot on the edge of Hemingway West. She noted that several neighbors ° have expressed concern that the sidewalk on this lot has never been properly installed. With the construction of two homes following approval of this rezoning application, the sidewalk will be completed. She explained that there has been informal consideration of a cluster- type housing project on property south of this site, with access provided through this property from Tara Hill. Access from Post Road would require building a bridge across the Indian Run which is cost prohibitive to the project. If the rezoning is approved, the issue of access to the southern site will disappear. The proposal for rezoning calls for a split of the property into two lots -one 80 feet wide, typical along Tara Hill, and the other 114-118 feet wide. Along the western perimeter there is a 50-foot wide overhead utility easement which would be included on the larger lot. A standard house for the subdivision would fit on the larger lot without violating the utility easement. Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 10, and the motion to approve included the following conditions: 1. Provision of utility easements as approved by the City Engineer. 2. Provision of appropriate water and sewer taps in conjunction with building permits. 3. Payment of appropriate park fee for the new lot by payment of half the park fee with each building permit. 4. Continuation of existing deed restrictions and construction of houses which are consistent with the established residential character. The civic association in Hemingway was notified in case there were any concerns. Staff feels the need for this property as a buffer disappeared as soon as the western property was zoned with 80 foot lots rather than 1/2 acre lots. Staff supports this application for rezoning. Mr. Amorose expressed concern that the surrounding neighbors on larger lots had expectations that this lot would remain a 1/2 acre lot - to split the lot now seems unfair to them. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 Meeting A N L AL October 19, 1992 Held 19 Ms. Clarke responded that the neighbors were all notified of the proposed rezoning and there have been no objections. She clarified that all lots to the east and west of this property on the south side of Tara Hill are 80 foot lots. There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the November 2 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 115-92 - An Ordinance Granting a Franchise to Time-Warner Entertainment Company LP to Construct, Operate, Own and Maintain a Cable Television System in the City of Dublin and Repealing Chapter 705 of the Dublin Codified Ordinances. (Second Reading) Mr. Hansley reported that staff has no further information on the ordinance at this time. Mayor Rozanski acknowledged Connie Beck, Warner's representative in attendance tonight. Ms. Beck responded to Mr. Sutphen's question, stating that there is a 77 channel capacity on Warner Cable. Subscribers to the new system presently have 59 channels available to them. There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the November 2 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 117-92 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 79.385 Acres, Located 200 Feet North of Summitview Road, on the East Side of Club Road (not built) Abutting the East Edge of the O'Shaughnessy Hills Subdivision, to be Rezoned from: R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District to: R-2, Limited Suburban Residential District. (First Reading) Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance and moved that it be referred to Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Mr. Sutphen expressed concern about the number of large trees, possibly "landmark" trees in this area. He asked about a timetable for adoption of the Landmark Tree Program. Mr. Amorose responded that a presentation on the program will take place at the Park & Recreation Committee meeting on Wednesday evening this week, but it will probably be quite some time before this comes to Council. Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Ordinance No. 118-92 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of Economic Development Bonds for Dublin Geriatric Care Company, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading) Mr. Sutphen introduced the ordinance. Ms. Grigsby explained that this ordinance relates to economic development bonds which were originally issued in 1987. Mary Duffy from the firm of Peck, Shaffer and Williams is here representing Dublin Geriatric Care to answer any questions from Council. Ms. Duffy stated that she is accompanied this evening by Dick Mitchell from Dublin Geriatric Care and Sam Butler from Bank One Capital Corp. She explained that this ordinance represents a remarketing agreement. They expect a tender of the bond and wish to remarket those. In connection with the remarketing, they desire to make certain changes to the original financing documents, including the substitution of a letter of credit from Bank One Akron for the original letter of credit from Barclays. That involves having the consent to certain documents from the issuer, which was the City of Dublin. It does not involve the issuance of any new debt, nor any liability. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mr. Strip clarified that the City is not taking on any new debt, but rather restructuring some of the financing. He asked why there is an emergency requested and when the bond counsel was aware of the situation. ' Ms. Duffy responded that the market is driving much of this. Ms. Grigsby was contacted several weeks ago in regard to timing for inclusion on Council agenda. There were several other issues, including notification from the letter of credit bank, when the Moody's rating would be obtained, and when the letter of credit bank would be able to come forward with their security which all affected the timing of submission of information to Council. Mr. Hansley clarified that the City is merely the vehicle for this funding technique which formerly was called "industrial revenue bonds". This was one of the last ones that Council issued. It does not involve any debt capacity against the City, but rather the City became the funding mechanism to help provide for a facility that paid tax benefits back to the city. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Mrs. King expressed concern with the timing issues for Council action. Ms. Duffy responded that the urgency involves the tender of the bonds and the requirements for notice to have the bonds tendered back. She confirmed that they will lose their "window" if this is not passed tonight. Mr. Campbell stated that this should not have been an emergency piece of legislation; it is ~ an emergency because of something someone else did, not because of what Council has done. Ms. Duffy responded that she did provide information to Council prior to the meeting so that they could review it ahead of time. She worked with t11e City's bond counsel, Squires, Sanders & Dempsey to have the information reviewed and a few minor changes were made at their request. They also worked cooperatively with the City's Director of Finance. She emphasized that the City looked very carefully at this project and approved it in 1987; this is simply a mechanism for changing the letter of credit. She introduced the representative from Bank One Capital Corp. to explain the timing requirements. Sam Butler, Bank One Capital Corp., explained that on December 1, the existing bondholders will tender their bonds, and without the ability to remarket the bonds to new investors on atax-exempt basis, the project's financing changes from a favorable tax-exempt basis to one currently on a taxable conventional basis. This would have adverse impacts on the financial viability of the project. He further explained that one of the fallouts of the commercial banking system today is that many people are pulling back letters of credit on various projects. In this case, an English-based bank, Barclays, provided the original letter of credit. They are withdrawing from the middle market in the United States altogether because of difficulties in England. As soon as Barclays notified them that they would not be renewing the letter of credit on December 1, he attempted to find an alternate letter of credit provider. Mr. Campbell asked when they found out that Barclays was pulling out, and Dick Mitchell of Dublin Geriatric Care responded that they learned of this two to three months ago. They immediately began searching for another bank to provide a substitute letter of credit. They contacted Bank One, and were put in touch with Bank One Akron. They entered into an agreement which had to be provided to the trustee by October 1. The rest of the process is fairly routine. Mr. Campbell clarified then that Dublin Geriatric Care was aware of the deadline for some time; the difficulty arose when Barclays did not renew their letter of credit and an alternate source of a letter of credit had to be found. Mr. Mitchell agreed. . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12 Meetin NK F RM N 70148 October 19, 1992 Held-_ 19 ' Ms. Grigsby added that the firm of Peck Shaffer & Williams has worked cooperatively with the City in providing information for review, and has also cooperated with the City's bond counsel in allowing lead time for them to review the documents. Mayor Rozanski still expressed concern that Council was not given the information prior to request for emergency adoption. ~ Vote on the motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; •Mr. Sutphen, yes. Vote on the ordinance - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Resolution No. 45-92 - A Resolution Amending Resolutions 26-89 and 19-90 Establishing a Community Reinvestment Area Within the City of Dublin and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading) Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Mr. Smith commented that Mr. Banchefsky is in attendance tonight to address this issue which involves an error in the district established when this was originally passed by Council. Mr. Banchefsky stated that the purpose of a community reinvestment area is to abate real estate taxes for some portion of time to induce or entice certain types of development to come to the community. These community reinvestment areas, pursuant to statute, are controlled exclusively by the municipal corporations. Schools do not favor them as the property tax, the bulk of which goes to the schools, is what is abated for a period of time. Since this legislation was enacted in the legislature, a change has been made whereby the school districts must be notified when the abatement districts are being established. It does not give them a right to veto, but merely notice of the abatement. The purpose, again, of community reinvestment districts is to provide a mechanism to rehabilitate blighted areas to promote commercial development. An example where this has been done in Dublin is the W.C.I. district off of Post Road. After having reviewed all of the previous legislation in which he was involved, and all of the minutes of the Council meetings, he believes it was never the intention of Council to abate new residential development. Although the statute does require that these districts include some form of residential housing, typically blighted housing or that in need of revitalization, staff believes the district was inadvertently drawn too large, encompassing the Tuttle Crossing area and a significant section of the Llewellyn Farms subdivision. This legislation before Council tonight amends the Resolutions from 1989 and 1990 to redraw the boundaries to delete the Llewellyn Farms subdivision, replacing it with property on the Rings Road area, and to rescind the two abatements granted. Since the resolution was advertised, several requests for abatement have come in from Llewellyn Farms subdivision. Staff believes that it is appropriate for Council to approve this resolution to deny the pending applications, declare an emergency to protect the school and community tax base, and to maintain fair and equitable treatment of the citizens in terms of the tax rate to which they are subject. This is basically a housekeeping resolution to correct an error made in 1989 when the district was originally created. Mr. Foegler provided additional clarification on the use of tax abatements to induce commercial development. Robert Stacha. 5855 Chatterfield Drive Llewellyn Farms, asked if it is Council's intention to vote on this resolution as an emergency, waiving second and third readings. Mayor Rozanski responded that it is. He requested, on behalf of himself and the Llewellyn Farms Civic Association, that notification be given to the 10 or so residents who have submitted applications for abatement of this pending action. The residents would like to prepare a response to the resolution. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 Ms. Clarke confirmed that the affected residents have not been personally notified of this legislation, though she did speak to a couple of the residents by phone today regarding this issue. Staff and legal counsel confirmed that they have no problem with removing the emergency language from the ordinance at this time. Council concurred. Eric Stone. 4263 Hertford Lane, Llewellyn Farms, addressed Council, stating that he is one of the two residents who currently have an abatement. He learned about this pending Council action at 4:00 today. He is requesting time to prepare his case, and added that he made the decision to build his home based on the fact that this was an abatement area. There will be a second reading of the resolution at the November 2 Council meeting. Other Final Plat - Donegal Cliffs Section 7 Frances Kovacs, 4817 Galwav Drive Donegal Cliffs, President of the homeowners' association, addressed Council, stating that the group has three concerns related to the acceptance of the final plat: 1. The street signage issue has not yet been satisfactorily resolved with Homewood Corporation, the developer. The developer has told the association that the street signage issue in the southern half of the development is to be resolved within the next couple of weeks, however this message has been given to the association repeatedly. Some of the existing signs which comport with the street sign requirements of the City of Dublin are not posted at certain intersections. There is confusion regarding the distinctive street signage issue and whether it would apply to Donegal Cliffs. Homewood was delaying installation until it was resolved; it has now been resolved. Mrs. King attended a civic association recently to confirm this, and Homewood was also notified by the association. Homewood has still not installed the signage -they claim to have the signs ready but not the posts. 2. The lighting at the southern entrance to Donegal Cliffs is an aesthetic issue as well as a safety issue. After S months of repeated calls to Homewood, this has been taken care of, but only just before this final plat came to Council. 3. There are concerns regarding the neatness of construction in the southern half of Donegal Cliffs. The sites have not been maintained in a satisfactory manner consistent with the regulations of the City of Dublin, and repeated calls have been made to the developer. He asked for Council's assistance to take care of these matters before approval of the final phase of this development. Ms. Clarke stated that she was not familiar with the signage issue. Mr. Hansley commented that staff has resolved the issue of what type of signage should be installed; the developer now must proceed with installation. He agreed that there is a safety issue with the missing signage. Mayor Rozanski proposed that Council not accept the final plat for Section 7 until the street signage is installed for the rest of the subdivision. Mr. Sutphen expressed frustration with the delays by the developer on installing the signage. He believes Council should approve the final plat for Section 7 only after the rest of the signage is completed in the subdivision. Mr. Strip proposed tabling the approval until the street signage is installed. Mr. Smith stated that Council could legally table approval of this final plat for the reasons discussed. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14 Meeting DAYT N L AL October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mr. Campbell moved to table the approval. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Don Kelly, 7814 Wicklow Court Donegal Cliffs, commented that he is a member of the Board of Trustees of the homeowners' association. He stated that he has correspondence regarding the signage issues dating back three years. Council passed an ordinance allowing the signage over a year ago. This is an example of how Homewood operates, acting only under pressure. Tree installation and lot clean-up have been handled in the same manner by Homewood. He supports tabling the approval. Mrs. King suggested that Council be sure the list of open items is complete. She summarized that there are three open issues: completion of all street signage which is also a safety issue; compliance with street tree requirements; and meeting requirements for proper waste disposal on construction sites. Mayor Rozanski suggested that representatives of the civic association contact staff regarding incomplete items for the subdivision. He suggested that staff then make a list of incomplete items for the next Council meeting; Council can then remove this from the table if appropriate. Mr. Smith suggested that Homewood be notified of the tabling. There was no representative of Homewood in attendance tonight. Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King, yes;.Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes. Reports from Council Committees Mr. Sutphen, Public Service Committee, stated that the Committee will meet on Friday, October 30 at 9:00 a.m. Mrs. King, Public Safety Committee, stated that the Committee met on Tuesday, and discussed fireflows in the southwest portion of the city, the B1ockWatch program, police staffing requests for 1993, the City's alarm ordinance, and rollerblading on City streets. Since the meeting, the rollerblading issue has been brought up by a police office and by a resident. She urged the resident to discuss the issue with other residents, and if there is a general concern about the issue, the Committee will then address it. She asked the clerk to check with other municipalities about ways in which they provide areas for this activity. Mr. Hansley commented that the Ohio Municipal League has been contacted for research on this issue. Arlington has recently set up a task force to study the issue for their area. There is a play street designation mentioned in Dublin's ordinances, but it has never been used. Staff is checking with other cities regarding their implementation of such a designation. He added that Homestead Park in the township area has an area designated for rollerblading and skateboarding which can be used by area residents. Staff is also exploring use of a City of Dublin parking lot in an area such as Avery Park in off-hours for rollerblading. Mr. Sutphen believes this is an overreaction on the City's part, and that residents should be permitted to rollerblade on City streets. Mr. Hansley responded that per the codified ordinances, rollerblading on the city streets is prohibited and thus must be enforced. At .the direction of the Safety Committee three months ago, joggers and rollerbladers in the roadway have been warned that these are improper activities on city streets. Staff does not have discretion on enforcement. At this time, they are merely issuing warnings for these violations. Jim Worby 4179 Haymaker Lane Dublin stated that he rollerblades in the Dublin area and has found it very dangerous because there are no set aside lanes on City streets for this RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 15 Meeting October 19, 1992 Held 19 ~ activity, or for bikers or skateboarders. In his hometown of Clive, Michigan adjacent to Grand Rapids, an ordinance was passed requiring all new or improved roads to have a 3 to 4 foot wide space or bike lane on the edges of either side of roads for bikers, rollerbladers and walkers. He suggested that Council review this legislation for use in Dublin. Mayor Rozanski stated that Council has tried to address this need with the extensive bikeway system throughout the City and the installation of sidewalks to make the City more pedestrian friendly. These areas can be safely used by bikers, rollerbladers and walkers. Maintenance of the bikepaths to the standards necessary for rollerblading is an issue which needs to be resolved. He is personally opposed to installing a lane on the side of streets since the City has the bikeway system under development. Mr. Strip, Finance Committee, stated that there is a budget hearing set for Monday, October 26 beginning at 7:30 p. m. Comments from Staff Mr. Foeg_ler stated that staff would like the Public Service Committee to review at the Friday meeting staff's recommendations for policy considerations regarding the grandfathering of tap fees for existing development. Mr. Foegler also clarified that the lane widening of 270 has been expedited, but the ramp improvements are still on the same schedule as previously set. There was special funding available which will expedite the lane widening of 270. Ms. Grigsby reported that final interviews are underway for the tax administrator position; ~r m staff hopes to have a decision made by the end of the week. Regarding the hotel/motel tax application, proposed revisions have been drafted by Ms. Puskarcik in conjunction with the Finance division. Ms. Grigsby distributed the proposed revisions to Council and requested the Finance Committee to review the recommendations with staff at 7:00 on October 26, prior to the budget hearing. Ms. Clarke stated that she provided a memo to Council regarding the status of the Tuttle Crossing mall rezoning in the City of Columbus. She commented that the Southwest Area Plan community forum was attended by 142 citizens. She will provide data to Council regarding the meeting in the next packet. Mr. Kindra responded to Mr. Sutphen's question on the status of street resurfacing, stating that much progress has been made. He expects to have a report on the status in the next week to ten days. Mr. Johnson stated that: 1. The signs in Old Dublin are being installed. 2. The speed limit sign on Avery between Post and Indian Run has been changed to 35 mph per the recommendation of the Safety Committee to the City Engineer. 3. The Muirfield Drive signage removal has been completed. 4. The mound on Dublin Road has been taken care of. Chief Ferreil reported that new D.A.R.E. cards are being issued featuring Ohio State athletes who oppose drugs. Council Roundtable Mr. Kranstuber recently noted two shops with neon signs at the Kroger shopping center and asked if they comply with Code. Ms. Clarke responded that a dry cleaner at that location has a permit for such a sign. He also asked if the COTA Park 'n Ride sign near Cardinal Foods is larger than permitted. Ms. Clarke promised to check and report back. Mr. Amorose commented regarding the announcement that JMB may proceed with the development of a mall at Sawmill and 161. He stated that if Council plans to take action RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council. Meeting Page 16 Meeting AVTON L AL October 19, 1992 Held ' 19 expressing concern about a proposed mall at Tuttle Crossing, it should take the same action regarding proposed development on the eastern border of Dublin. Mr. Hansley noted that the Sawmill and 161 location is already zoned for the development A and may proceed once the wetlands issue is resolved, as apparently is imminent. There may be no time for Council to take any action. Mayor Rozanski agreed with Mr. Amorose that Council should express concerns regarding the Sawmill and 161 proposed development just as they may do about the Tuttle Crossing mall development. They will have similar impacts on City services. Mr. Campbell concurred. Mr. Sutphen noted that he recalls that the developer of Sawmill and 161 had at one time committed to help pay to widen 161 from 33 to Sawmill. Council, at that time, had voted that 161 would be widened to include a boulevard. Mr. Hansley commented a certain anchor 3 to 4 years ago made a commitment to pay part of the cost to widen 161 from the river all the way to Linworth in the hopes of moving ahead faster with the project. The commitment was not made by JMB, but by the anchor who wanted to accelerate the project. Mr. Amorose stated that for all of these reasons, it is important to make contact with the developer as soon as possible. Mr. Hansley commented that even if the wetlands issue is resolved for the mall at Sawmill and 161, they will still need to seek anchors for the project, many of whom are now committed to Tuttle Crossing. Mr. Sutphen stated: 1. He observed 14 cars at the car pool lot at Eiterman Road this morning. 2. He noted the welcome announcement from Duke Associates that Xerox is now open and employs 300 people in Dublin. 3. The northwest corner of the water tower on 161 at Adria Labs is rusting and needs painting. He asked Mr. Johnson to budget this for next year. 4. Thanked the clerk for attending the continuing education program at Kent State. 5. Asked for a motion from Council to buy a VCR for the Council meeting room to be left in place for use by Council members. Discussion followed by all about the use of equipment and facilities by staff and Council and options for assuring that it is available and properly maintained for all who wish to use it. Mr. Amorose moved that staff purchase a VCR and monitor from the Council budget for the Council meeting room, designated to remain in the meeting room. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Discussion followed about the use of the Council meeting room by groups other than Council, and the lack of space available for Council members to meet or work in the Municipal Building. Mr. Campbell stated that he agrees there is a need for space set aside for Council exclusive use due to the ongoing need to meet to conduct City business. He does not agree with purchasing an additional VCR and monitor for exclusive Council use. Mayor Rozanski commented that the Council meeting room has been in better condition following a letter to all of staff sent out by Administration at his request. The issue is that if something is borrowed, it should be returned in the cbndition in which it was found. He agrees that Council needs an exclusive space, but considering the crowded condition at City Hall he thinks it is not possible at this time. He does not believe purchasing an additional VCR and monitor is necessary if people return what they borrow. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 17 Meetin NK FORM NO. 10148 October 19, 1992 Held 19 Mrs. King suggested that the issue of equipment be resolved in the budget process, and that the room be shared under the conditions outlined by the Mayor. Mr. Amorose again expressed concern that there is no space set aside where Council members can meet with citizens or do legislative research. Mayor Rozanski responded that there is no other conference area in the Municipal Building available. Vote on the motion to purchase a VCR and monitor -Mrs. King, no; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, no; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, no; Mr. Sutphen, yes. Motion carried. Mrs. King stated the following: 1. She thanked Mr. Campbell and Mr. Kranstuber for their efforts in meeting with developers to address issues and the excellent report prepared with the assistance of staff. 2. She directed attention to the fine document prepared by the Finance Department in conjunction with the bond upgrade and cited it as an excellent source for information about the City. 3. Believes there is a need to obtain additional information on both the Tuttle Crossing Mall proposed developrrient and the JMB development regarding cost impacts on the City of Dublin. She recommended that Council members make a list of exactly what they want to ask Columbus to do and the developer to do regarding Tuttle Mall so that Council is prepared if a positive response is made to the letter being sent by Council. 4. Reminded Council members to complete the clerk evaluations and turn them in to Mayor Rozanski. 5. Corrected today's Dublin Villager where it was reported that Mrs. King said that, "There are enough building rmits to last for 10 to 20 years. " She actually said, "There are enough rezoning areas to build upon for 10 to 20 years. " 6. Reminded Council that a date needs to be set for goal setting. Mayor Rozanski responded that Council needs to discuss the status of goal setting with staff. Mr. Campbell noted that: 1. The Dublin community has many famous athletes who reside here or attended school in Dublin, including Bobby Rahal, Kent Mercker of the Atlanta Braves, and Vince Workman of the Green Bay Packers - a unique feature for such a small midwestern city. He suggested that the City consider sending them congratulatory letters upon occasions of their accomplishments and ask them to serve as grand marshals for parades in the City. 2. Asked about the status of the 161 project and whether it will be finished by November. Mr. Kindra confirmed that the City expects completion by the end of November. 3. He asked about the Tuller Road project, and Mr. Kindra stated that the project is not moving along as quickly as expected, but regardless of the construction schedule, two lanes will be maintained throughout the winter season. _ 4. Also requested that updates be provided regarding the work on 270. Mr. Hansley stated that this will be provided to Mr. Campbell as they are received from Columbus. 5. Several residents of Earlington have called him regarding problems with construction sites on Bardston Drive, where construction debris is blocking the stone walkways provided for students walking to school. There are lots on the north side which remain undeveloped and thus have no sidewalks or walkways. Staff has attempted to work with the contractor to keep the walkway open. It will cost $800 to $1,000 to put gravel on the north side lots to provide a walkway for students. He is seeking Council's input to resolve this situation. Mr. Hansley stated that he has talked to some of the residents. Staff has informed the contractor that the temporary sidewalk on the south lot must remain open. If the contractor RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 18 Meeting A L L October 19, 1992 Held 19 does not cooperate, the City will proceed with installation of a temporary gravel sidewalk on the north side, as this is a public safety issue. Mr. Johnson added that he will closely monitor the situation during school traffic hours. Y Mayor Rozanski noted that the bikepath continuation on Coffman Road is finally under construction, after a long wait. Mr. Hansley announced that Mayor Rozanski captained the team, including Mr. Smith and Mr. Kranstuber who played yesterday at Soccer First, the new soccer facility in Dublin. Mr. Hansley captained the other team, including Mrs. King and Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Hansley's team prevailed by a score of 9 to 8. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p. m. _r- qr;` Presiding Off i'~ Clerk of Council RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS Dayton Legal Blo nk Co., Form No. 30045 --i _ lic•sulirlini~ ,1'r~. 46-92 Pn•s••serl _ IJ _ _ A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL'S DESIRE TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBUS TO MITIGATE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A REGIONAL SCALE MALL AT THE TUTTLE CROSSING INTERCHANGE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, Dublin City Council and Staff are aware of the proposed regional scale mall to be located in the City of Columbus at the Tuttle Crossing Interchange, currently under consideration by the City of Columbus; WHEREAS, Dublin City Council and Staff have sincere concerns over the impact such a regional scale mall could have on infrastructure, transportation needs, police, fire and emergency services, as well as the quality of life, both in the City of Columbus and the City of Dublin; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by 'Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, members concurring that: Section 1. Dublin City Council and Staff express their desire to work with Columbus City Council and Staff for the mutual benefit of both cities, to resolve. and/or otherwise mitigate the impact such a regional scale mall would have on both communities. Section 2. The Clerk of Council is hereby directed to forward this Resolution to the Columbus City Council Clerk. Section 3. This Resolution be, and the same hereby is, declared to be an emergency measure for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and therefore this Resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. Passed this day of , 1992. Mayor - Presiding Officer ATTEST: Clerk of Council October 19, 1992 DRAFT TO: Members of Columbus Development Commission and Columbus City Council Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is written to express our concern regarding the pending rezoning in Tuttle Crossing for a regional mall. On behalf of the Dublin residents and the surrounding residential communities, the City of Dublin would like to express its sincere desire to work with the City of Columbus in mitigating any negative impacts on the surrounding communities which may result from this proposed development. Specifically we are concerned with the potential traffic impact of the regional mall on neighborhoods and road systems in the southern part of Dublin. Our residents have also expressed concern with the possible increase in crime both within the mall and in the surrounding residential areas. We would also hope that the architecture, material and scale reflected in the development standards for the mall are consistent with the attractive surrounding residential and commercial development in both Columbus and Dublin. Similar attention needs to be paid to the numerous "spin-off' developments likely to be initiated as a result of the mall development. We are confident that Columbus is conducting a thorough and comprehensive evaluation of this proposed rezoning. Dublin would request that we share information so that both communities can obtain a complete understanding of the effects of the proposed rezoning on the entire Tuttle Crossing area. If the City of Dublin can provide any information to assist you in your evaluation of the potential impacts of this proposed development, please feel free to request that information. In addition, if you care to meet with any of our staff members to discuss our concerns in more detail, we would be happy to meet with you at your convenience. It is hoped that the improving, positive working relationship between the City of Columbus and the City of Dublin can continue and that our mutual concerns for our residents on the impacts of this large commercial development will be addressed. Yours truly,