HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/05/1992 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting
N
October 5, 1992
Held 19
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council was called to order by Mayor
Jan Rozanski at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, October 5, 1992 and Mr. Kranstuber led the Pledge
of Allegiance.
Members of Council present for roll call were: Mr. Kranstuber, Mrs. King, Mayor
Rozanski, Mr. Strip, Mr. Amorose, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Campbell.
Mr. Hansley, City Manager, and Mr. Smith, Law Director, were also present. In the
absence of the clerk, Myra Caplinger served as Acting Clerk.
Approval of Minutes of September 28 1992 Meeting
Mr. Amorose moved to table the approval of the September 28 minutes which were
distributed this evening to allow additional time for review.
Mr. Strip seconded the motion.
The consensus of Council was to table approval of the September 28 minutes until the next
regularly scheduled Council meeting.
Correspondence
There was no correspondence to Council.
Presentation by Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission
Mr. Bill Habig gave a slide presentation to Council highlighting MORPC's many programs.
He commented regarding several programs directly impacting the City of Dublin:
k 1. I-270 North improvements -the addition of a lane each way in the median area is
currently in the design phase and scheduled for construction within a few years.
2. A study of the entire corridor from Avery Road to Hamilton Road and from Powell
Road south to Morse Road is underway for future freeway improvements, including
rebuilding of interchanges such as Sawmill, further widening of the freeway,
improvement of crossroads and parallel roads.
3. MORPC is working with Washington Township on a township plan. This plan is
being shared with Dublin and Columbus staff.
4. The inland port at Rickenbacker Airport, announced today, will open the entire area
to international trade.
5. Currently working with COTA on a long-range rapid transit plan for the region.
The plan should be completed within a year.
6. Working with Columbus to coordinate the results of its Comprehensive Plan with the
other member governments.
7. Have worked with Dublin's staff to obtain greater federal funding for projects such
as State Route 161 and the 745 bikeway.
In response to a question from Mrs. King, Mr. Habig stated that MORPC has furnished
traffic projections to the developer of the proposed mall at Tuttle Crossing. The developers
- are proposing to widen Frantz Road at their expense; the county and the city are looking
at improving the intersection of Hayden Run and Frantz to accommodate the increased
4 traffic.
Mrs. King asked Mr. Habig to comment on the adequacy of the Barton Ashman traffic plan
for the proposed mall.
Mr. Habig stated that the roadways as scheduled to be improved will be adequate to handle
the traffic from the proposed mall. He added that roadway improvements will be required
south of the Dublin area to accommodate some of the traffic. This may result in a change
in priorities for capital improvements planned by the City of Columbus.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting
AVT N L
October 5, 1992
Held 19
1996, Mr. Habig stated that there are environmental. reviews necessary for the portions
crossing the rivers. The 1996 estimate for beginning construction was provided by
Columbus. They are hopeful that it can be started sooner.
Mayor Rozanski thanked Mr. Habig for attending tonight's meeting and providing updates
on projects within the region.
Comments from Visitors
Scouts from Den 9, Pack 210, Scottish Corners School were present at the Council meeting
and were introduced by the Scout leader. Mayor Rozanski welcomed them to the Council
meeting.
Mayor Rozanski announced that Council would take a short break in order to set up
additional chairs for the many Llewellyn Farms residents who were in attendance at
tonight's meeting to discuss their concerns with the proposed Tuttle Crossing Mall.
James Greyard, 5716 Chatterfield Drive, Dublin, stated that he represents the civic
association tonight. He described the many amenities Dublin offers to its residents -reasons
which compelled him to choose to live in Dublin over other suburbs. He read descriptions
of Dublin from a promotional brochure produced by Edwards Land Company in conjunction
with the Tuttle Crossing development. He does not believe the vision described by Edwards
Land Company is consistent with the currently proposed mall development.
Tom Ouigizy, 4699 Belfield Drive Dublin, commented that his family was drawn to the
Dublin area by the many desirable amenities as described by Mr. Greyard. He based his
decision to live in Dublin based upon established rules regarding development standards.
The group's goal this evening is to discuss the possible impact of the mall on Dublin
residents. He requested that Council and residents work together as a coalition as suggested
by Mrs. King at a recent Council meeting. He stated three goals of the group: (1) to
address the group from a Dublin perspective; (2) to communicate that Llewellyn residents
support responsible commercial development, as outlined in the December 1988 zoning
agreement; (3) to seek Council support for a resolution drafted by residents. He distributed
the draft resolution to Council members.
Mr. Quigley then read the draft resolution to Council titled, "A Resolution to Prevent
Rezoning from Office to a Regional/11-fega Mall at Tuttle Crossing within the City of
Dublin." (Copy attached) He asked Council to consider supporting the resolution, and
asked for their opinion on the resolution.
Mayor Rozanski stated that Council was not expecting to consider a resolution on this issue
this evening.
Mr. Strip suggested that Council. first bear all other speakers.
Mrs. King commented that Council legislative actions are customarily advertised, read three
times to allow for input from all interested parties, and not passed by emergency unless it
is absolutely necessary.
Rich Gomez, 41.57 Hertford Lane Dublin, stated that the Llewellyn residents completed a
survey regarding the proposed mall. He pointed out the highlights:
1. Ninety-four percent of Llewellyn residents oppose the mall.
2. Residents generally support an under-200,000 sq. ft. retail development,
neighborhood and community oriented, as they had been promised.
3. Regarding retail development on the Dublin side of Tuttle Crossing, 153 were
opposed and 44 were in support.
4. Regarding a possible convention center at Tuttle Crossing, 186 said no and 11 said
yes.
RECORD OF PROCEED[NGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 Meetin
---g----
K F RM NO. 10148
October 5, 1992
Held-_ 19
ei n e iyo oum us pan opu am a
and Sawmill. Llewellyn residents are opposed to a mall at Tuttle Crossin with the
g
resulting retail development in the area which will follow.
Mayor Rozanski clarified that the rezoning being discussed by the residents is the City of
Columbus rezoning for Tuttle Crossing as proposed in April of 1992.
~ Larry Lehner. 4136 Hertford Lane Dublin, Vice-President of the civic association, stated
that the residents are also discussing the original zoning for the Dublin portion of the Tuttle
Crossing area set in 1989. The residents want the original Dublin zoning to be maintained.
Charles Postlewaite, 4229 Haymaker Lane Dublin, stated that the residents are here this
evening to oppose the mall locating in Dublin, in the case the rezoning fails in the City of
Columbus. They are seeking Council's support to oppose the mall at Tuttle Crossing,
whether in the City of Columbus or in the City of Dublin.
Mark Gra 4786 Belfield Court Dublin, commented that he has lived in Llewellyn for 3-
1/2 years. He recently spoke to the traffic engineer representing the firm which did the
study at the proposed mall site, and found that the engineer based his study on several
flawed assumptions and has greatly underestimated the possible future traffic flows. He
believes the credibility in the zoning process is lacking in view of the proposed changes
from what was originally approved. He questioned what type of capital expenditures for
infrastructure by the City of Dublin would be necessary to support the mall development.
Mr. Hansley responded that any improvements needed to serve the mall would be paid for
by the City of Columbus since the property is in the City of Columbus. In response to Mr.
Gray's question regarding improvements necessary if the mall were located within the
Dublin portion of Tuttle Crossing, Mr. Hansley responded that the area is zoned for high-
~ level development and thus the basic systems in place or already planned would support
such ahigh-level development. The costs for many required improvements are often passed
along to the developer. He added that the Edwards Company's land in the Dublin portion
of the Tuttle Crossing area is already properly zoned for ahigh-level development such as
the Xerox Building which was recently completed in Dublin.
Tom Heskamp 4776 Belfield Drive Dublin, stated that he has worked in Dublin since 1978
and moved here in 1988 because of the aggressive approach to controlled growth and desire
for quality development in the community. His concern is with the conspicuous silence of
Dublin City Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Dublin School Board relative to
the proposed mall development. He suggested that the mall be located instead at the
previously planned site at 161 and Sawmill. He asked, "What price does Dublin have to
pay for a free interchange at I-270 and Tuttle Crossing?"
Dick Burtsell 5806 Chatterfield Drive Dublin, directed his comment to Mrs. King,
suggesting that he has observed other occasions when Council has waived three readings on
an issue and they should do so for this resolution.
Kelly Godshall 4608 Tuttle Road Dublin, commented that she has worked in Dublin for
years and moved to Dublin nearly three years ago. She stated that she and her husband
were recently robbed in their Llewellyn Farms home, and she does not want to be "robbed"
~ once again. The residents are fighting for protection of their families and their homes. Her
fear is that a mall built in Columbus at Tuttle Crossing will place a tremendous burden on
the Dublin police. She asked for Council's support in their effort.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the resolution must be advertised before it can be introduced to
Council. It can then be introduced and Council can consider waiving the three readings.
He further commented that he would like more information on the mall prior to stating his
opinion to the group.
Mr. Campbell commented that he has no opinion at this time on where the mall should be
located. As a Council member, it is important to maintain an open mind until such time as
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Meetin
NK FORM NO. 10148
October 5, 1992
Held 19 I,''
u v n any propose rezoning w is may e p ace m e u ure. a so
~ a
acknowledged the importance of listening to both sides of an issue.
Mr. Lehner stated that the mall issue is a community issue and not just a Dublin issue. He
is seeking Dublin's support of the resolution to oppose the mall.
Mr. Smith stated he could not recommend that City Council vote on a resolution which
contains language stating that the City of Dublin would not accept a rezoning for which an
application has not yet been filed for a parcel property within the City of Dublin. That
could in effect represent a taking. This resolution is not merely one which requests support,
and it is premature to pass legislation with the language as stated.
Mr. Lehner then offered another version of the resolution which had been prepared by an
attorney. He distributed the resolution titled, "A Resolution Reaffirming the City of
Dublin's Support for the I-270/Tuttle Road Subarea Development Standards as Passed by
Council for the City of Dublin, Ohio on January 16, 1989. " (Copy attached) Mr. Lehner
read the resolution into the record. He further explained that Dublin City Council must "put
the rumors to rest" -the rumors by the Glimcher Corporation and the Edwards Land
Company which say that if Columbus does not take this mall, it will come across the road
to Dublin.
Mrs. King stated that she believes that it is important to sit down with all residents who
have views on this subject, because there is not a consensus at this time. She proposed that
Council's Land Use Committee or Public Service Committee review this issue and the
related infrastructure and road network issues. She believes Council needs to understand
the impacts of the proposed mall development on the City of Dublin by working with the
City of Columbus, the Columbus School District, and Columbus City Council to see that
the needs of all communities are met. This issue is regional and requires a regional
' approach to a solution.
Mr. Sutphen and Mr. Amorose stated that it would not be fair to form an opinion or to vote
on this issue without listening to both sides. It is their duty as elected officials to do so.
Mr. Strip expressed concern with the adversarial position taken by the Llewellyn residents.
Members of Council reside in the same city and share the same concerns regarding
development issues. Secondly, the residents should have used the process in place for
bringing resolutions to Council. This would have ensured that the resolution was voted
upon tonight. He also expressed displeasure that Council members have not been invited
to civic association meetings. Although Council members may have concerns about the
proposed mall development, they cannot legally pass a resolution pledging to vote against
a future rezoning for a mall in Dublin at Tuttle Crossing.
Mr. Kranstuber expressed concurrence with the comments made by other Council members.
He agreed with the position stated by Mr. Smith of the legality of Council action re ardi
a future rezoning. Procedures are in place for rezonings as a matter of public trust. ng
Mayor Rozanski asked that City staff request information from Columbus on the proposed
~~y mall development and also ask that Columbus keep Dublin apprised of future information
as it becomes available. Staff will review the traffic studies for the proposed mall which
~ were given to the City of Dublin on Friday morning. Another study is underway for the
Dublin Road area, and staff will evaluate that study when completed.
He suggested that this matter be referred to the Land Use Committee, as proposed by
Council Member King, to study the effects which a mall on either side of Tuttle Crossing
would have on the City of Dublin. He cautioned that the Land Use Committee is already
committed to a long list of projects, including the Community Center and the Economic
Development Plan.
Mr. Lehner stated that their group is working under a deadline of November 5 when the
Columbus Development Commission will hear the rezoning. He cited Sherri Savage's
comment at a June 15 Council meeting where she stated that if Dublin would take an official
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 _ Meeting
NK F RM N IOI48
October 5, 1992
Held
19
m , i cou ma e a ig i erence. s. avage as een una e o ge any
response from Dublin's Planning Department.
Mrs. King commented that she does not respond to requests from Ms. Savage who does not
..a live in Dublin, but she does respond to requests from Dublin residents. However, she is
only one member of City Council -all seven need to work on the issue. Regarding civic
# association meetings for Llewellyn Farms, she stated that Council members will attend
meetings upon an invitation from the residents.
Mr. Campbell proposed that the Land Use Committee meet this month, and that staff bring
the information they have regarding the mall to the meeting. The Committee will then
report back to Council as a whole when the proposed resolution is under consideration.
Mr. Kranstuber asked for clarification from Council regarding what the Committee should
look at: (1) taking an opinion or (2) redrafting an ordinance concerning potential Columbus
action. The other issue would be addressing rumors that the mall is coming to the Dublin
property at Tuttle Crossing.
Mayor Rozanski stated that he believes the Committee should look at the impact a mall at
either Tuttle Crossing location would have on City of Dublin services and infrastructure as
well as property values.
Mr. Campbell proposed that the Land Use Committee meet on Thursday, October 15 at
7:30 p.m. He requested a report from staff on the potential impact on Dublin of a mall in
either possible location based on what staff knows at this time. The Committee will then
bring a report back for the Council meeting on Monday, October 19, where he assumes
there will be some process initiated on the resolution, if appropriate.
' Mr. Strip suggested that Mayor Rozanski make it clear that this will be an open meeting or
work session where the public can attend, but generally does not participate.
Mrs. King requested that staff address the residents' concerns about increases in crime that
a mall could bring. She also suggested that the residents share the information which they
have about the mall with City staff and Council.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that residents can send information to the City or to him or Mr.
Campbell.
Mr. Campbell requested that the meeting be advertised for the Land Use Committee at 7:30
p. m. on Thursday, October 15. He requested that staff give a presentation to Council on
the various issues presented tonight. Notice should also be given to any other interested
parties.
Mayor Rozanski concluded the discussion, stating that, Council members have long been
committed to maintaining high development standards for the City of Dublin. Council has
no intention of changing those standards at this time. He asked the Llewellyn residents to
invite Council members to their meetings in the future.
Grey Mack 5610 Braeside Court, Dublin stated that residents are seeking Council's help
to resolve the Tuttle Crossing issues. He is hopeful that the Dublin City Council attempts
to sit down with Columbus City Council to resolve the issues about the proposed mall.
Mr. Oui lev commented again, stating that he apologized for submitting the resolutions to
Council at such a late hour. It was not designed to surprise Council - it simply was not
completed until just before tonight's meeting. He believes that Council's actions regarding
the proposed mall will have an important effect on the future of Dublin. He pointed out
again the crime statistics about malls as reported in Columbus Monthly. He promised to
follow-up on inviting Council members to future civic association meetings. The residents
plan to attend the October 15 Land Use Committee meeting at 7:30 p.m. He also asked that
Council take a proactive stance regarding future developments which may affect Dublin.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meetin~_._
N F M N 10148
October 5, 1992-
Held
19 it
u wi s e m orma ion regar mg crime s u ies m e area. e an e ounce
for listening this evening to their group. ~
Legislation
Ordinance No. 104-92 - An Ordinance Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for Road
Salt for the Time Period Covering November 1, 1992 through March 31, 1992 and
Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into a Contract Governing the Procurement of
Said Salt. (Third Reading)
Mr. Hansley reported that there is no new information on this ordinance. Staff is
recommending adoption of this ordinance.
Vote on the ordinance - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes.
Resolution No. 41-92 - A Resolution Adopting a Mission Statement for the City of
Dublin. (Third Reading)
Mr. Hansley stated that staff has been working on this for over two years. This version has
been produced by three staff members with input from Council, and staff is recommending
adoption.
Mr. Sutphen commented that he believes it is too long. He asked Mr. Hansley how staff
envisions this mission statement will be used.
Mr. Hansley responded that this statement will be posted in public meeting areas and work
areas to define who we are and where we believe we are heading over the coming years.
~ It will not be used as a slogan or a motto, but will be part of the total quality management
approach over the next 6 months to a year.
Vote on the resolution -Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr.
Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
Resolution No. 44-92 - A Resolution Accepting the Amounts and Rates as Determined
by the Budget Commission and Authorizing the Necessary Tax Levies and Certifying
Them to the County Auditor, and Declaring an Emergency. (Second Reading)
Ms. Grigsby stated that this she is requesting passage by.emergency in order to file this with
the County Auditor by October 13.
Mr. Amorose moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr.
Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Vote on the resolution - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr.
Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Ordinance No. 115-92 - An Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into a
Cable Franchise Agreement with Warner Cable. (First Reading)
Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance.
Mr. McDaniel stated that Council had previously been given information regarding the
franchise agreement. A report from the cable consultant, Greg Dunn, was provided to
Council last week. Mr. Dunn is present this evening to address Council, along with John
Porter, President of Warner Cable. Marty Saperstein who assisted staff with a telephone
survey is also present this evening.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Meetin
K F RM N 10148
~ October 5, 1992
Held
19
por uni y o wor wi u in. a gave a ne
background to Council on the process undertaken for the franchise renewal -public hearin
survey, and negotiations with Warner Cable. g ~
i
1. He stated that they found that there was some customer dissatisfaction in Dublin
related to outages, bad reception, size of converter boxes, and interfaces between
VCR's and cable. These problems could be solved by a rebuilding by Warner as
was done in Worthington. Warner has agreed to rebuild within a year. It will be
a fiber optic, 77 channel system, with 57 channels initially programmed. It will
place Dublin in the top 1 or 2 percent of municipalities in the country for cable
service. ,
2. Warner has also agreed to provide payment centers at a local area such as a bank for
customer convenience.
3. Dublin will have its own emergency override system to warn cable customers of bad
weather. This will be broadcast from the municipal building.
4. Warner has also agreed to design their system so that all Dublin residents can be
served, even when annexations occur outside of their service area; if this is found
to be technically or economically unfeasible, it will not be done.
5. Another feature provided will be a character generator at City Hall for bulletin board
information, i.e., trash pick-up, etc.
6. The City can also insert videotape to override the Columbus Channel 3 if desirable.
7. Additional compliance and enforcement language was added, together with customer
service standards.
8. The remaining issue which was not resolved to the consultant's satisfaction is the
term of the agreement - 12 years plus the remaining time period left on the current
franchise. The tradeoff is that the City's residents will have a rebuilt system at an
earlier date.
9. There is language included regarding rate regulation which will revert back to the
„a City if Congress passes pending legislation.
10. The City will also have a communications line between City Hall and the Justice
Center -Warner will provide the fiber optic and the City will provide the
electronics.
11. The franchise fees will increase to 5 percent of gross; Council has the option of
keeping them lower if desired.
He recommends passage of the ordinance.
Mr. Dunn confirmed that Warner Cable will provide the hook-up and free service to the
new Dublin Justice Center. They will not provide additional televisions to the city.
Mr. Strip thanked Mr. Dunn for a job well done in negotiating this new agreement.
Mayor Rozanski interjected that the news media is present to cover the next ordinance on
the agenda, and stated that the ordinance presently under discussion would be held over until
after Ordinance No. 116-92.
Ordinance No. 116-92 - An Ordinance to Authorize the City Manager to Enter Into an
. Inducement Agreement with Columbus Hockey, Incorporated to Assist in the
Construction of an Indoor Ice Facility, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Sutphen introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley stated that this is non-binding legislation of support to indicate what the City
of Dublin and the Columbus Chill are willing to do in regard to building a facility in
Dublin. If the legislation is passed, the attorneys will be asked to work out the legally
binding agreements that will follow. This ordinance represents a handshake agreement by
the staff of the City of Dublin and the Chill, subject to formal approval tonight in concept
and legal approval within two or three Council meetings. Staff strongly recommends
passage. Staff recommends waiving of the required three readings as this is non-binding;
there will be further legal discussion at future meetings.
A formal press conference to announce details is scheduled for tomorrow at 12 noon at City
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8 - Meeting
N FORM N 10148
October 5, 1992
Hel
~ 19
veryone presen is evening is we come o a en a con erence. e i
y is c ose
to announcing a land decision; staff hopes to do this at the press conference, and the
decision will be subject to formal Council approval at a later date.
_
Mayor Rozanski commented that initial discussions with the Chill began last November.
He added that this is a great opportunity for both the Chill and for the entire Central Ohio
area.
a
Mr. Hansley emphasized that this is anon-binding agreement and a first step in the public
review of the proposal. Negotiations have been underway for some time; the public and the
press will now have the opportunity to review the proposal.
Mrs. King thanked staff and the partners for making this facility possible.
Mr. Hansley added that there are three sites under consideration, and none are close to
residential areas of Dublin.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that he believes the facility will be a great success and is much
needed in Central Ohio. It will hopefully spur the formation of new high school hockey
teams. He added that the facility will be an important draw for businesses as part of the
local economic development program.
Mr. Campbell commented that the facility will have long-term benefits for Central Ohio for
professional teams as well as for local amateurs and recreational users. There is the
additional possibility of other uses for the facility over the next 20 to 25 years. It is a very
positive step for Dublin and for the rest of Central Ohio.
Mr. Strip moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber,
yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes.
Mr. Strip commented that all of Central Ohio should thank the City Manager, Tim Hansley
and his staff for their efforts in this endeavor.
Vote on the ordinance - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr.
Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the presentation on the cable franchise would now resume.
Ordinance No. 115-92 (continued)
John Porter, President of Columbus division of Warner Cable, stated that an agreement was
worked out on the reconstruction of the cable system in Dublin. Warner's goal during
negotiations was to maintain the positive relationship they have enjoyed with the City of
Dublin. Phase 1 of the rebuilding is currently underway. Conversion of customers to the
new system will take place within 30 to 45 days, with completion by March or April. He
..~,a invited Council members to visit the new Warner facility at 1266 Dublin Road.
,w Mr. Strip asked if there will be special access for the school system.
Mr. Porter responded that there is no dedicated channel for the schools. Because of the
win-win agreement regarding school boundaries, it would be difficult to work this out
legislatively.
Mayor Rozanski thanked Warner Cable on behalf of Council and the Dublin residents for
their cooperation during the franchise negotiations.
In response to Mrs. King's comment about Warner's corporate headquarter move from
Dublin to Connecticut, Mr. Porter stated that over two-thirds of the cable division of Time-
Warner has now been headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut while Time-Warner is
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9 Meetin
F RM N 10148
October 5, 1992
Held
19
qu er in an a n. was a corpora a ecision o ring various en i ies o e
~ merged corporations in closer proximity, and was not in any way a reflection on the Dublin
community.
Mayor Rozanski acknowledged the presence of Connie Beck of Warner Cable who has
assisted with the negotiation process.
There will be a second reading of the ordinance at the October 19 Council meeting.
Other
Final Plat -Dublinshire 4 Phase 1
Ms. Clarke stated that this is a final plat for a piece of property that is predominantly zoned
PLR. There is a small 6-acre portion which is zoned PUD as well. Dublinshire 4 is
located between Avery and Muirfield Drive. On the Avery side, it is directly opposite
Wynford Drive which is part of a subdivision currently under construction.
This final plat was approved by Planning Commission by a vote of 8-0 with 8 conditions
appended. The conditions are listed in the Record of Action attached to Council's copy of
the plat. Two conditions have not been resolved:
1. That the street tree plan,. Avery Road/Muirfield Drive mounding and landscaping
treatment and entry feature plans be submitted for review and conformance.
(Condition #3)
Ms. Clarke has spoken to the landscaper but has not yet received the plans.
~n..~,
2. That sidewalks be constructed along all public streets, including Avery Road and
Muirfield Drive, except where bikepath has been substituted.
(Condition #8)
Ms. Clarke reported that the applicant's response is that sidewalks have been included along
Avery Road and all internal streets, and a sidewalk has not been shown along Muirfield
Drive since this area adjoins public parkland. The staff's position is that unless a specific
waiver is issued by Council, a sidewalk would be required along Muirfield Drive as well.
She reported that she has not spoken directly to the applicant regarding this; the response
was received just today.
Other than these, all conditions have been complied with. Approval of the final plat will
permit the applicant to proceed with the recording of the document and transfer of lots once
the subdivision is complete and accepted.
Jim Gabriel Civil En ineering Associates stated that the street trees plans and entry feature
plans were submitted with the rest of the material.
Ms. Clarke responded that her comment specifically relates to the perimeter landscaping
along Avery Road and Muirfield Drive. This is the plan which has not been received to
date. She spoke to Mr. Ciminello who said he has looked at the Indian Run Meadow
subdivision and is preparing a landscape plan that will repeat those same plantings as City
Council had previously requested.
Mr. Gabriel stated that the applicant has every intention of complying with the previous
commitments and thought the plans submitted were adequate. He will take care of this
concern. Regarding the sidewalk issue, there was an additional strip of parkland dedicated
along Muirfield Drive and thus some concern about putting a sidewalk along the street when
it should perhaps be through the park. If it needs to be along the street, they are willing
to do so.
Ms. Clarke stated that there are no sidewalks to the south except in front of the church.
There is no sidewalk along the backs of the homes in Indian Run Meadow, as this
subdivision was zoned prior to the change in the ordinance. As part of the Indian Run
Meadow PUD, the developer upfront submitted a plan showing where he would put
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 Meeting
D YT N L
October 5, 1992
Held- .
19
si ew s an were e wou no pu si ewa i i -
it was inappropriate to go back and add a condition several years after zoning. The area
to the north has not yet been developed.
Mr. Sutphen commented that there was discussion at the Public Service Committee meeting
regarding the importance of completion of some of the gaps in sidewalk on the west side
of Muirfield Drive.
Mr. Strip stated he believes it is important to the community to have a sidewalk on
Muirfield Drive.
Mr. Campbell moved to approve the final plat subject to the conditions of the Planning &
Zoning Commission as stated in their record of action of September 10 meeting.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr.
Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Ms. Clarke stated that the City will be withholding signatures on the plat until the conditions
are complied with.
Reports from Council Committees
Mr. StriA, Finance Committee, reported that he recently met with accounting professionals
from the community regarding the tax ordinance changes. He has submitted a report to
Council on the meeting. He added that Bryan Thurman did an excellent job of representing
the City to the community.
Mrs. King Public Safety Committee stated that there is a meeting set for Tuesday, October
13 at 8:00 a.m, at City Hall.
Mr. Sutphen Public Service Committee commented that a meeting for the Committee is
set for Friday, October 30, at City Hall.
Mrs. King asked that staff comment on meeting dates for the 1993 proposed budget.
Mr. McDaniel responded that the Operating Budget preparation is proceeding on schedule,
while the CIP is not completely ready for presentation. •Staff anticipates introduction of the
budget at a late October meeting, prior to the first reading date on November 2.
He proposed meeting on Monday, October 26 at 7:30 p. m. for an initial review of the
budget.
Mr. Strip stated that, as an alternate procedure this year, Council members could perhaps
each concentrate on their various areas of interest within the budget -economic
development, land use, safety, or finance.
Mayor Rozanski asked that a memo be sent to Council regarding the meeting date.
Comments from Staff
Mr. Hansley reported that Sandra Puskarcik has planned an excellent program for the press
conference regarding the Chill. Many area officials have been invited, and he is hopeful
that Council members can attend.
Ms. Grigsby stated that there were 10 bids on the Muirfield Drive notes; the low bid was
Fifth Third Bank at 2.59.
Mr. Harding commented that staff will soon enter into negotiations with the F.O.P. Capital
City Lodge #9. A meeting is set for October 16 to discuss issues. He will keep Council
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11 Meetin
NK F RM NO. 10148
October 5, 1992
Held- 19
ri e e s us o ese nego is ions.
i^
Mr. Hansley added that staff does not anticipate any major issues for these negotiations and
expects them to go well.
Mr. Kindra stated that the mound on Browning Court is scheduled for removal tomorrow.
In connection with construction of the Woods at Indian Run subdivision, Coffman Road will
be partially closed on Wednesday from 9 a. m. until 4 p. m.
Ms. Clarke reminded Council members that a public meeting regarding the Southwest Plan
Update is scheduled for Tuesday, October 6 at the 1919 Building beginning at 7 p. m.
Mr. Smith reported that he has provided information to Council which they had requested
regarding the legality of a hold on rezonings.
Council Roundtable
Mrs. King stated that the Safety Committee has recommended that the speed limit on Avery
Road north of Post and south of Valley Stream be changed from 45 to 35 mph, in response
to residents' concerns. Mr. Kindra has concurred and will implement this change.
She announced that the Franklin County Regional Solid Waste Authority will meet
tomorrow in Reynoldsburg City Hall to review the proposed agreement with the City of
Columbus to transfer the solid waste reduction facility to the Solid Waste Authority.
Mr. Campbell commented that the City of Columbus has done an excellent job in the Bethel
. Road widening project - a project which benefits all area residents.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the approval of Dublinshire 4, Phase 1 brought to mind that the
section of Dublinshire east of Muirfield Drive will include the school area. He asked staff
to explore the possibility of signage to alert motorists to the school area prior to the opening
of the road. This will avoid a similar situation to Scottish Corners.
He thanked staff for their participation in the "Out of Bounds" dedication at Avery Park
yesterday. Ms. Jordan and Ms. Puskarcik did an excellent job in coordinating the event.
Mayor Rozanski stated that there is no need for an executive session to discuss legal issues.
He requested that Council members return their evaluation forms regarding the Clerk of
Council prior to the next Council meeting.
He thanked Myra for serving as Acting Clerk this evening while the Clerk is attending out
of town training.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p. m.
. ~
L .
a~or, Presid' g O er
C~~
yv~.E- G~-~~
Clerk of Council Q
fiv
A RESOLUTION TO PREVENT
REZONING FROM OFFICE TO A
REGIONAL/MEGA MALL AT
TUTTLE CROSSING WITHIN THE ,
CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the area effected by rezoning to allow a Regional/Mega
Mall at Tuttle Crossing is bounded by Frantz Road/South Dublin
Boundry/Scioto River/Rings Road is primarily residential zoning;
and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of Llewellyn Farms homeowners
to restrict a Regional/Mega Mall from being developed on the
Dublin protion of the Tuttle Crossing Interchange; and
WHEREAS, with the residential Llewellyn Farms properties currently
in place the Council of the City of Dublin will protect and resist
rezoning which would allow encroachment on Llewellyn Farms
properties with a Regional/Mega Mall at Tuttle Crossing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Dublin, State of Ohio, concur that a future rezoning to allow
Regional/Mega Mall is not acceptable at Tuttle Crossing within the
City of Dublin.
Passed this day of , 1992.
Mayor - Presi ing O icer
Attest:
C er o Counci
A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING
- THE CITY O~ DUELIN'S SUPPORT FOR
THE I-270/TUTTLE ROAD SUBAREA
DEVEI,C)PI~NT STANbARDS AS PASSED SY
COUNCIL FOR Z'FiE CzTY OF DUBLIN, OHIO
ON JANUARY 1~, 1989
WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Dublin, Ohio, have through
their elected representatives caused the area located at the
northeast corner of Interstate 270 and Tuttle Road in the City of
Dublin, Ohio to be zoned for a unified, high quality office park .
development as part of the I~270/Tattle Road subarea development
standards passed by council for the City of Dublin, Ohio, on
~a~~a~ 16, 1989. .
WHEREAS, the axea to the sauth of the above described area in the
City of Columbus, Ohio is the subject of a planned commercial
development for and approximately one million square foot mega
mall which will greatly increase traffic and congestion on the
Dublin City streets.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLED that the City of Dublin by and
through its council reaffirm its support for the I-270/Tattle
Road subarea development standards as passed by council on
Januaxy 16, 1989,
Passed this ~ day of 1992
Mayor - Presiding Officer
Attest:
Clerk of Council